TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kampane Archive

View 9 posts and 439 comments by Kampane on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think everyone should be able to get behind this, regardless of ideology. What do you mean by "this"? I have no idea what the comic means. Go to college? Sure, that should be an option for both genders.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:10 AM
1

Is that a good thing?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:08 AM
6

The Relationship Surgery is an advice foum Repeat after me. Advice columns are crap. Advice forums are crap. Avoid at all costs.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:06 AM
1

Sad, but I feel the same way. Our enemy is our enemy until they stop attacking us.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:04 AM
1

I don't see that phrase anywhere on their page.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:02 AM
3

I nearly stopped reading this early on, but the last section was the best part.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:57 AM
2

Just expand the definition of rape to keep inflating those numbers!
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:48 AM
5

that is an EXCESSIVE amount of rape Compared to what? 1 murder per year is excessive, and also exceptionally low compared to anything we can hope to achieve. At some point you have to ask what we're going to do about it, and if the cost is higher than the benefit. The Feminists have been pushing ideas with a huge cost for men (falsely accused) without much benefit for women.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:48 AM
2

Crime reduction is great, but Feminism is pushing to make rape accusations even easier. They're pushing to presume guilt. This creates other innocent victims who are falsely accused. Wrongful conviction for rape is even worse than rape itself. Not a feminist, not a men's rights activist, just someone who advocates equality I have no idea what "equality" means here, but you should advocate for balanced justice instead. Minimize victims. Minimize rape victims, minimize false accusations.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:45 AM
7

Because there are still 83,000 forcible rapes reported annually? And a bunch of them really happened too. If the average person lives 70 years, there would be 584,000 reports of forcible rape in their lifetime in the whole country. That's like 1 per 267 women in the country. And a bunch of them really happened too! Of course there are other problems in life. Like, the USA currently has 2.3 million prisoners. Or the 32,000 traffic deaths per year. Those people actually died. Have you seen the une…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:40 AM
2

Women have special ways of knowing! And we know that there is a rapist hiding behind every shrub! Too bad there aren't any female cops. They'd fill the prisons thrice over!
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:31 AM
1

he venue has been bullied by a bunch of men’s rights activists and the venue are considering cancelling our booking. Or maybe the venue actually read your crazy ass website. What a bunch of misa-misas (hater haters? What, it's better than pig Latin).
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:23 AM
-3

Guys, it is not in our interest to appear to be attacking feminism Why?
/r/MensRights21/04/13 03:53 AM
3

If they don't teach laws like this in sex ed, what fucking value are those classes?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 09:54 PM
1

She doesn't. Read the other posts. It's all satire.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:35 AM
1

Just read the other posts. Satire.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:35 AM
3

Onwards!
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:33 AM
1

Well done.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:33 AM
6

Even as an MRA, I'd say some of us are offensive. Just like any other group.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:32 AM
2

The comic at the top... at least they accurately represented the races on both sides.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:29 AM
5

The straw man, presented by the very incarnation of the straw Feminist.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:23 AM
7

Or the ignorant masses.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:19 AM
1

According to most sources, nine out of 10 rape victims are female. Rape culture is to blame for this. So... she'd be happier if more men were raped? To put it simply, men’s liberation can go two ways: when men are seen as being disadvantaged by the patriarchy and when men are seen as being inferior to women. (Guess which one is valid.) I'll go out on a limb and guess... neither. Here's the worst one: Feminism is not just for women. One whole paragraph after: [men] don’t need a designated voice b…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:17 AM
1

Perhaps it is. Perhaps some men would bring a hard science perspective to a field that's supposed to rely on hard science. Seems like Evolutionary Biologists are going to subsume the entire field at this rate.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 01:49 AM
1

Why so cynical? At least it's on the record then. Plenty of women are completely decent people, and understanding. The system exists to help, so you might as well try it.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:26 AM
1

Isn't this exactly what MRAs fight against? So that we can join any field or profession?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:38 AM
0

Talk to HR.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:55 PM
3

So because it's female dominated, keep men from joining the field?
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:54 PM
5

My only recourse was to look down and hope to be defended as one of the 'good ones." Wrong-o. Your only recourse is to stand up, declare that you have somewhere to be, and leave. This isn't a discussion of MR issues, but merely bad manners. It's best to avoid adults with bad manners.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:50 PM
2

Yeah, I don't know what to make of those numbers.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:07 AM
2

Okay. Bodice rippers were a genre of romance novels for women. They were big in the 80s. I don't think they exist anymore.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:55 AM
5

Well, you have +106 so you're just fine now. For the future, look at what people did in the other posts about this story (in news, worldnews). I think it's the only reasonable way to attack these emotional issues. Use simple statements of fact such as, "nobody knows what really happened." Remind people that these are just allegations. It's probably best not to speculate too much, because people will attack you there. One more thing. I think the police did fail her. They should have been able to …
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:43 AM
2

"Not saying no" means consent seems like such a reasonable standard, and practical. I don't think we'll win that fight for another 20 years though. Also, did you reply to the wrong comment?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:37 AM
1

Common criminal behavior. I've seen much worse.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:35 AM
1

You're always welcome to question sources, but I think you should question the facts and their argument instead. As for CharityWatch, the criticisms on the Wikipedia page are pathetic. In my opinion. Most publicly traded companies report non-GAAP financial numbers.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:30 AM
1

“One man’s sexual assault is another man’s sexual fantasy come true” So true. The key difference, of course, is consent. I'll also accept "consensual non-consent" as in BDSM.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:25 AM
1

Does that genre even exist anymore?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:19 AM
5

As an MRA, all I can say is that I hope this is thoroughly investigated (if found plausible), and that they don't release any names before conviction.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:19 AM
15

You literally created a reddit for this comment.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:13 AM
24

What? Where? Link please.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:11 AM
1

He used the word correctly, and he has a point. Even though I agree with you about the school.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:11 AM
0

Yeah... you'll still get harassed and threatened by the mods on /r/feminism but they can take a small amount of criticism.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:23 PM
2

So basically you've had success on topics where Feminists don't have an agenda. Rape? Men don't get raped! Divorce? Women need money and kids need mothers! Suicide? Well okay. I don't think that's success :-(
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:46 AM
2

A lot of us are confused by the big gap between Feminist rhetoric and behavior. I think most of us are fine with women doing whatever victimless thing they want, but you'd think that would be the Feminist position. Go figure.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:41 AM
-10

Database? Just make a web page to list all five of them.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 04:03 AM
1

Well what a shock. They sure do hate dissent.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 12:53 AM
3

I don't think mods can shadowban.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 09:27 PM
0

Well that's how they operate. You probably knew that going into it ;-)
/r/MensRights31/03/13 09:25 PM
-1

The only view you need to accept is that women still need more equality You also have to accept that Feminism is the means to achieve such equality.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 09:25 PM
0

I've been posting to /r/feminism. If I tiptoe around and follow the rules very carefully I only have to tolerate repeated PM harassment from the feminists (mods?). They haven't actually banned me yet.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 09:20 PM
2

I'm not going to watch 40 minutes of video. Sorry! Could you mention any highlights? A summary?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:16 PM
3

But... where's the funny part?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 07:53 PM
6

You've had many answers to your questions, so I'll offer other thoughts. Why does the MRM exist? I think it's a reactionary group. For the most part we fight Feminists where Feminists have pushed laws, rules, or attitudes far past any reasonable middle ground. The most relevant examples to my life are: Workplace sexual harassment complaints. One misinterpreted comment by me, or one lie by a woman and I could be fired. Worse, I could be sued. False rape accusations. Every guy is at risk. I don't …
/r/MensRights30/03/13 07:56 AM
1

Drunk sex can also be rape if one person gets the other drunk without their knowledge. Not that most adults would fall for that.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 07:09 AM
1

That's probably the best option. Alternately use RES.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:11 AM
17

No context, just yelling. Why is she mad? Why do you think she's SRS? Just being crazy seems like proof but isn't.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:03 AM
2

How many dozens of times has this been posted here?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:01 AM
6

Article is unreadable. Post something more clear, because I have to downvote this one.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:59 AM
1

Yes, in private her friends probably don't call her a moron for what she did. Shen she seeks public sympathy, she's going to get the honest truth, which is that she was fucking stupid and nobody should follow her example. Rape victims aren't generally named, so she has the option to keep things between her family, friends, and the police.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:33 AM
3

I appreciate your point but you're taking it too far. Yes, we MRAs push the idea that not all men are rapists. Because fuck that, they aren't. But there are some rapists (say 0.5%) and some guys who'd take advantage when it's easy (say 3%). It adds up to enough that women shouldn't pass out drunk in a house full of young drunk guys. That's not "rape hysteria" as you keep saying, it's common sense and good advice. If you continue calling it "rape hysteria" I'm going to lose respect for you.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:18 AM
1

Claim 4: Feminism is seen in a bad light I think I can find some evidence of that... ;-)
/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:40 AM
4

Uh, they are. Young men full of hormones looking to get laid? Check. Those young men are drunk which reduces inhibitions? Check. She was probably flirting with guys before passing out? Check. Sounds like a bad recipe to me. I strongly suggest she use more caution.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:28 AM
6

It's a teachable moment. Others can learn from such mistakes.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:25 AM
4

You're so right. Likewise if I leave my Lexus in the worst neighborhood in town, it's not alright to steal it. You wouldn't blame the victim there, would you? Would you?
/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:24 AM
3

Actually there is a point. They need to learn so that they're not putting themselves in danger, and others need to learn from their mistakes. Any sort of campaign saying that "It's okay to pass out drunk with people you don't trust, you should be 100% safe." is doing a disservice to anyone who believes it.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:22 AM
1

I'd prefer they don't ban sexist items, but if they must ban some, they must ban all. 'Keep calm and rape a lot' Fucking hilarious and complete nonsense. I'm tempted to make one just to offend the overly sensitive, but that's too much even for me.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:17 AM
0

In my opinion, it's every bit as wrong as rape. It should be prosecuted as a crime.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:13 AM
3

It doesn't say men can't attend.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:12 AM
1

Both are white and it came as a shock that the baby isn't white. I thought a bit about this, and I bet they were both shocked. He was shocked it wasn't his baby. She was shocked too, because she'd convinced herself it was "just one night" and must be her BFs baby. It's amazing what people convince themselves of.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 12:57 AM
16

The r/news post (not from me) links directly to this article which mentions /r/MensRights directly. Beyond that I think it's a double smear. They're saying all of reddit is a bunch of MRA sexist pigs, and they're implying it was MR who insulted/threatened Adria Richards. At least that's my impression. It seems that all of the links go to feminist slanted articles, or in turn link to such articles. It's a bit of a click fest.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 12:49 AM
23

You are correct, but the other half of the equation is that I'm now actively avoiding CNN. I used to respect them.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 09:00 PM
1

I'm tired of this story. Yes, some university has a group of crazy bitches in charge of their student union. That's a local issue. Unseat them next year but don't update us with every idiotic thing they say.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 03:11 AM
1

I didn't realize anyone read that section of the newspaper. I never have.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 02:24 AM
1

That's a good point, but I wonder what percentage of rapists use condoms these days.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 02:20 AM
8

They hired a feminist to take their intern position, writing crap columns nobody reads.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:39 PM
5

Don't Bang Denmark: How To Sleep With Danish Women In Denmark (If You Must) Suddenly I kind of like this Roosh guy.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:38 PM
6

I personally don't have a problem with PUAs, sleeping around, or even lying for sex. That's how it's always been and nobody's going to change it. I mostly see PUAs as immature, and expect them to grow up within a year of joining "the scene". I do think you'll be much happier once you find a worthy partner, so long as you're worthy too. As for "fighting feminism with logic", we aren't really talking to feminists. That's impossible; they're man hating cultists. Our audience is everyone else. We'll…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:37 PM
0

Well people can be shits, especially people with power. You could be right about all this, but I'll believe it when I see a lot more evidence. Regarding verbal abuse slang like faggot or worse, I think those words are intended to shock. Homoerotic words are shocking and easy.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:13 AM
2

Yes I read Lord of the Flies. It's a work of fiction. I'll tell you what, if you think this sort of thing is common, why not talk to a few of your friends from other states. See what they think. I sincerely doubt it was common 25 years ago.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:49 AM
0

So, are you grasping for some logical conundrum involving sexual orientation as two distinct mathematical sets? Wow, you really are that naive! Every voluntary action has some motivation. I'm trying to understand your explanation. tortured for information [...] Put people in a twisted enough environment, and all sorts of stuff comes out. Honestly that sort of thing doesn't "just happen". I could see it in situations with extreme sexual frustration (prison), but your story sounds more like a cult…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:17 AM
0

How much time have you spent in a "Lord of the Flies" context? I mean real stuff, where you felt genuinely concerned about your personal safety -- from a group of guys? Well I did survive high school. there were plenty of other manly outlets. Latent homosexuality is a thing. [...] It's about dominance. I'm not sure I have your story straight. Are these closet gay guys, or do they just need to dominate?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:43 AM
-1

guys climbing on top of other guys and pounding their fists into the other guy's chest. I wouldn't call that sexual dominance. I know for a fact that there was sexual molestation perpetrated by cadets on each other, and that it happened as a means of dominance. With no women around, I guess some guys just can't find any other way to be better than others.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:20 AM
6

Okay, so why don't they address it?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:41 AM
4

Sexual dominance is especially shocking and potent and also fueled by sexual frustration in such environments. Okay, you mean rape? You're saying that alpha hetero guys would rape other guys to keep them down? What are you smoking? Let me say this plainly: alpha guys get the girls by walking up and flirting. Beta guys are already beta; everyone in the room can see it instantly. Especially, the women can see it instantly. There is absolutely no need for alpha men to rape guys in order to get girl…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:29 AM
1

Could we get him to stop talking to us, too?
/r/MensRights17/03/13 08:19 PM
-1

What, you want some kind of activist judge who makes up their own laws??? /s
/r/MensRights17/03/13 08:18 PM
28

You're the top voted comment, so spell it out for us. What's the reason?
/r/MensRights17/03/13 08:11 PM
0

exclusionary politics Are you not suffering the very same malady you accuse others of? Blame the other side for every bad thing; that sounds exclusionary to me.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 05:10 AM
-5

Don't bring your crappy politics into this. This is idiocy, not democrats.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:48 AM
0

Oh, I didn't realize you were a novelty account. "Arrogant and wrong" isn't the most fun novelty account, but still you should make it more obvious. I admire your remarkable persistence in sticking to your novelty theme.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:46 AM
1

Really? I guess you'd call the declaration of independence "(pie-in-the-sky fairy-tale make-believe feel-good) notion of human rights that you dreamed up while gazing at the stars" too.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:47 AM
1

I'm glad you wrote the article, but you could do better. All the genital mentions detract from the writing, I'm sorry to say.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:34 AM
2

I had this exact thought.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 04:22 AM
0

If you consider free speech to be a human right rather than a constitutional right, the title makes complete sense.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 04:22 AM
3

The reddit website is pretty tolerant of different views. Even though they had to cave on that jailbait issue I still respect the admins. That must drive feminists crazy.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 04:01 AM
3

he started speaking and wouldn't stop For like 10 seconds. It was awful. Why are we linking to buzfeed again?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 03:55 AM
3

Good comment, but don't view it as victimhood. Like most adults you control you life, and anyone who can't follow the most basic rules (like don't hit me) has got to go. Let her know that clearly. From a more sympathetic perspective, you should probably talk about whatever made her so mad. Most couples don't communicate well, and double for A.S. folks.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 03:38 AM
5

The takeaway? NY Daily News is a trashy rag, and you shouldn't read it.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 03:14 AM
2

That's worth a top level post. Disturbing in the extreme.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 11:06 PM
8

Does attorney-client privilege work both ways? Could someone hire her, get that on the record, and then get her disbarred?
/r/MensRights09/03/13 08:05 AM
17

In all fairness he was listing things people have heard a hundred times. His closing line was pure gold though. for a panel ... around reddit, you should have had some reddit users. (huge applause)
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:42 AM
2

His wild punches were fair warning. All animals know that attacking something larger than you is fair warning that you're going to feel pain, but somehow human females have forgotten. From the video, she'll feel pain in about 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:21 AM
8

They're releasing this in 15 second episodes. I can't wait for the next episode where he destroys the cheering section.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:18 AM
0

No signin link
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:16 AM
14

This article (as it stands) is terrible. Maybe deletion will pave the path for a real article to replace it.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:07 AM
4

Yeah, but not really. People don't notice $1 a month.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:44 AM
1

Wrong. Police should always be skeptical. In this case, the rape accuser: Is ugly as sin Is a known false accuser Provided no real evidence And they still grilled the guy for 9 hours. That CCTV footage saved his ass. What does this prove? That the police are far too eager to believe rape accusations. Every aspect of the case should be considered before you arrest anybody.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:18 AM
2

Wow OP, you argued very reasonably. I'm impressed. Also, good charity work talking to this less intelligent woman.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:56 PM
3

Look, feminism started with some valid complaints and a lot of anger. They got most everything they've asked for, so what's left? Anger and hate. Your post is great in theory, but wrong in practice.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:51 PM
16

SRS is a hate group. You expected what, exactly?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:42 PM
10

subjected to semantic corrections
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:33 PM
1

They may see the writing on the wall, but we have a long way to go.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:32 PM
1

That I can believe. That's not what I got from your earlier message though.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 10:09 PM
1

I know white males who won scholarships, so I'm very skeptical that none apply to white males. Sorry, I don't believe you.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 09:47 PM
15

Unfortunately, /r/MensRights tends to preach more anti-feminism than equality You're complaining about that comment? That's a completely true statement. Of course we're agitated by our strong and hateful enemy.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 10:25 AM
2

I'm white and male there aren't any scholarships out there that apply to me. Bullshit. Have you really looked through the scholarship catalog?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 10:18 AM
-1

Then you're not trying to select the best people, you're trying to set right wrongs of the past. If you didn't notice, you just switched arguments entirely. You've conceded when you had said we should be ashamed. As for your brand new argument, no. Women are given all sorts of chances in education there days, and men are the have-nots. If women want to make it into the Harvard Law Review, they can make it on their own merits and earn that respect just like everyone else. Finally, you should use …
/r/MensRights24/02/13 10:14 AM
2

You've got skin in the game and your judgement is impaired. The simple truth is that if you want the best people, you choose the best people anonymously based on merit. Any other selection criteria reduces the chance of selecting the best candidates. That's a simple truth, plainly stated. However you seem bright, so I look forward to your counter argument. edit: just please don't say "shame on you".
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:39 PM
2

Yes, as opposed to candidates who make different choices.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:17 PM
1

Shame on you. You need to step back. We're holding a rational discussion where you just so happen to be wrong, and you just so happen to be the guy trying to shame others into agreement. We don't approve of feminist tactics here.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:15 PM
1

Do you really think that the top black candidates for acceptance are any less qualified than the top white candidates Terrible question. Ask instead about the average white versus average white person they accept. If they used a merit based system, I'd expect the same average. If they use systemic race or gender based bias, I'd expect them to differ.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:13 PM
1

I like the idea, but the dividing line didn't make sense to me.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:40 PM
3

Okay, devil's advocate. What about other costs like rent, heating, and transporting the kids to school?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 01:42 AM
7

You're such a whiner. They dated for 10 months. They just arrived home from a date. A kiss, even if she didn't want it, is just not that bad.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:44 AM
0

I have mixed feelings about that...
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:28 AM
6

Relationships are far more complicated than the simple world view you present. A kiss after a date in no way justifies any violence.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:27 AM
15

I'm a big boy and I can take care of a rapist on my own. Depends how drunk you are, friend.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:21 AM
5

Yeah... but when a complaint is made who really gets blamed?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:20 AM
14

98% of successful marriages begin with rape. Aren't statistics fun?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:19 AM
1

You could probably fake your own death for a lot less than 18 years of child support.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:48 AM
1

Am I not?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 04:51 AM
3

A decent argument. Sex isn't a bad decision, it's life. We are alive, and we have sex. The child is important, and what better way to protect actual children than to encourage children where both parents love and want them? Except child support does the opposite, it encourages single mothers. It encourages mothers to "switch fathers" for their children because they won't take the effort to make one relationship work. Child support is a false boon for children. Yes it helps children of single mot…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 05:36 AM
5

I'm happy to help others but feminists hurt my self-interest. Everyone has priorities. I'll probably think of this next time I consider donating.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:46 AM
9

Is Andrea Houston someone notable?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:39 AM
3

Are MRAs so resentful of feminism that you can't give feminists credit for anything? ... uh, yeah? I donate to PP as a guy. For women, donating to PP is their own self interest. For me, it's helping others and doing what's right. Who gets credit? Feminists. Fuck 'em.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:35 AM
-1

$3.6B per year? So, pretty damned cheap. Less than 0.1% of the federal budget, never mind state budgets. $108B owed, nearly half represents welfare payments. Y'know what? The guys probably can't afford it. Remember that whole deal about child support always going up but never coming down when he loses his job? Yeah.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:32 AM
2

I think... I think it has to do with the fact that I'm, like, smart when I when I'm when I see my and I've taken self defense, NO, DON'T HISS. Hilarious.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:26 AM
3

No better character assassin than yourself, right? God damn.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:24 AM
2

Good to hear that. Maybe you should talk to her about discrimination against boys in education. That's one of our main concerns and you should be able to research the topic easily. It'll probably go over better than talk of false-rape, shitty divorce, domestic violence, etc.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:20 AM
2

The so-called achievement gap is so - between boys and girls - is so well reported now, I don't think we really need to plow that ground. Huh? It's like putting scare quotes around something she agrees with... or does she? I'm confused. boys are being discriminated against, if I can use that? I know it's a heavy-handed term, I'm just going to use it for now. Oh no, the interviewer is letting her bias come through.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:59 AM
4

to not identify as a feminist is the same thing as not identifying as a commie during the McCarthy era Isn't that backward?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:55 AM
2

A pre-sex contract or change the laws. A legal solution to a legal problem.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:53 AM
-1

Great, your solution is male surgery.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:52 AM
1

reduce it down to the abortion debate. Please, no. I much prefer having all 4 scenarios.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:51 AM
3

I didn't see it that way. He's just simplified the equation and dispensed with the superfluous language. For example, you could also complain that he portrayed the woman as heartless because she didn't care what the father wanted.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:51 AM
2

Christ man, she isn't even fat.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:48 AM
1

Transcript please?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:47 AM
3

Hilarious. We would like to know what y'er packin' before the blessed event happens. I got to say, this girl speaks only for herself. What a nutcase. That's honestly the only line I heard from her, and it was enough.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:45 AM
3

my mum has ostracized me and has cut off email contact. I am 16 years old ugh, great. Sounds like negligent parenting. Here are 4 things to try, in order: Try talking to your mother. Point out that you don't know these videos. Show her a hateful feminist video your sister probably never watched. Point out that she's being a bad parent. Try talking to your father. Cite examples of ostracism. Ask him to intercede on your behalf. Email (separately but at the same time) your father's parents and you…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:43 AM
3

12 minutes of not-very-interesting.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:29 AM
4

That's just language; always changing. Most likely these words will be forgotten in 20 years, or more likely in 10. Just ignore it unless you have a real concern.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:26 AM
3

I need feminism because some people still think they don't. Who am I to argue with such intellectual giants?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:25 AM
0

Am I the only guy who has no clue what you just said?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:11 AM
2

Here here.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:10 AM
16

Apparently, this is worthy of being unfriended. with a few old friends messaging me, telling me that I'm a terrible person Congrats, you've figured out how to get your hate filled ex-friends to disown you. Even better, they self-identified to keep you from mistaking normal people as haters. Suddenly short on friends? Not to worry, there are normal women even in universities. Alternately, find some new friends who are abnormal-in-a-good-way.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:37 AM
2

So why are the men on top pushing this law? Are they feminized?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:32 AM
1

OKCupid, but that was before it was bought. They did a good job without endless questions like some of the pay sites are. Of course the endless questions were available if you want them.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:43 AM
0

Columnist had pretty fair advice. It's just flirting at worst. Keep it professional and don't think too much about it.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:47 AM
1

Good idea, but have you considered just requiring that rants have a tag? I know some reddits allow you to filter by post tag.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:42 AM
10

How does this differ from what HuffPo has always been?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:40 AM
11

It's sold through Amazon by AWW stores. Maybe OWW stores would be a better name. Want it pulled? Organize a group of people to call Amazon customer service and complain. Also write letters.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:38 AM
9

This thread is MGTOW bait. Most MRAs ignore these threads, so you'll mostly get anti-relationship advice. From a regular and happy guy, take this advice instead: you want a reasonable, equitable woman who's compatible with you, but it'll take a lot of mistakes before you learn to recognize her. Just don't get married to young or before you've had a few long term relationships.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:35 AM
-1

I’d get some little fem-bot harpy in my face shrieking the same old tired slogans, like a mindless Chatty Cathy doll, about how I was threatened by losing my power, wanted to keep women “in their place,” was probably violent, and was a misogynist Proper response: look her straight in the eye and say, "Violent? You have no idea."
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:31 AM
7

In other words, they don't date one man at a time, yet advertise themselves as candidate for a monogamous relationship. That's what dating is. It's not exclusive until you agree it's exclusive. Didn't your friends ever tell you this? Don't use free dating websites Worst advice ever. Some free sites are great, which makes all pay sites a ripoff.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:27 AM
7

Wouldn't you feel more comfortable on a dedicated MGTOW reddit?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:24 AM
15

And everyone learned to ignore the tabloids, as they're full of shit. The problem is, blogs are too numerous to remember their reputation. People just trust whatever they read, without considering the source. Readers should be skeptical by default, rather than trusting.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 01:58 AM
2

I think there's a gap between what you thought you said, and what you originally wrote. I'm glad you meant voluntary circumcision of adults.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:39 AM
3

Circumcision performed on babies for reasons related to culture or aesthetics in a society that is already low in HIV positive individuals is akin to FGM and morally wrong. Circumcision to decrease the communicability of one of the most negatively impactful diseases in the world is akin to amputation to prevent further infection and death. Okay, that exempts Africa I guess. Three separate clinical trials have shown a 55-60% decrease in the transmission of HIV once circumcision has been performed…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 05:35 AM
1

sex can be a yes the whole time and then at the very last second it can be a no and, as a male, I need to stop Yeah, that's happening. Just before you orgasm? Nobody would stop.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:43 AM
3

She regrets her actions. People do grow up.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:41 AM
15

Okay. Realistically nobody ends up in jail when a boy fails to say no. Even so I support a "how to say no" class for boys and girls. We could probably get the traditionalists in on that idea too.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:36 AM
1

I didn't realize the No Punctuation guy wrote a blog. The author of this word spew is anti-feminist but mostly just a traditionalist. Traditional Women's Rights Activist, right? Bloggers like this seem like our stupid, inept enemies whereas feminists seem like our stupid, overly energetic enemies. I'm not sure which I respect less.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:32 AM
1

Stop spamming please.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:23 AM
1

Captured After 700 Miles On The Lamb My hat's off to any criminal who can ride 700 miles on a lamb. I'm sure her ass is quite sore and she should be sentenced to time distance served.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:20 AM
1

Okay, good argument but I really hate the term "financial abortion". It's just gross, especially since the child would probably live. Why not compare it to adoption instead. "financial adoption" isn't the best phrase but maybe someone could word-smith it.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:17 AM
6

If someone did this to my kid, would it be immoral to beat that person? How badly could I beat them without becoming the bad guy?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:08 AM
7

Holy shit, what year am I living in? They stuffed a kid in a duffel bag? Shock therapy? This is legal due to gross negligence but the school board authorized payment for these items. The school administrators ordered staff to torture these kids. These people are deranged. These people must be desperate to maintain order with no funding. Either that or they're deranged.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:05 AM
3

Christ this is sexist. They're implying that straight men can't drink water because they don't "swallow"? What about gay male tops? What about lesbians at all? Just one more poster ignoring the needs of men. ^<sup>/s</sup>
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:58 AM
2

Great game; I bought 4 copies. I look forward to their next game, infant trainer where you can shake the baby just enough to shut it up without going to the hospital. ^<sup>/s</sup>
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:50 AM
2

Neither the police nor CPS ever considered him [the father] a possibility for custody of the boy. CPS trash. They should all be fired immediately. Hire good replacements as you find them. I'm sure 1 good manager and 10 compassionate and balanced case workers could do the good of 100 of the current morons. officials investigated Fresno County and, [decided] everything there was hunky-dory Is any state in the union more feminist than California? Thanks for showing us the light guys.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:43 AM
1

What's a gender-feminist and how does it differ from a feminist or just a woman?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:42 AM
2

Jesus. She's clearly an accessory to murder. Just as guilty as the guy. That makes me so angry.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:41 AM
69

Thanks for speaking up. Honestly though, girls should learn how to say no. There's nothing worse than a girl who doesn't want sex but won't say no. That's just bad news.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:30 AM
3

It's you who are conflating statistics. Again I take no position on the truth of these statements. "Most criminals are black" (A1) is equivalent to "Most rapists are men" (A2). "Most black men are criminals" (B1) is equivalent to "Most men are rapists" (B2). The poster essentially compared B1 and B2. You're arguing against A1, and you made an unsupported leap to get there.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:47 AM
9

Men are as nature made us, as our mothers raised us, as women have loved us, for many thousands of years. All men are not the same person, we are not guilty as a gender, we are not guilty of our father's sins, we are not guilty of your father's sins, we are simply ourselves. Men: Born to be loved. What does it mean? (Written to a feminist) Every man is born from woman and man. A mix of both. Every child is born free of sin. A man cannot be blamed for the actions of a another man, just as a woman…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:33 AM
0

You reversed what the text actually said. It never says that most criminals are black, instead it says that most black men are criminals. I take no position on the truth of this statement.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:54 AM
3

Current feminist tactics hurts men and stunt the progression of change because all it does is blame men If you define The Patriarchy as society then yes men are victims of society. Specifically the parts of society feminism created over the last 50 years.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 05:46 AM
1

Stop whining. +20 is enough for the top 10.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:11 AM
3

Really? Isn't that begging for a dog pile from everyone who doesn't like a guy?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:55 AM
1

She said she asked for it, so what's the problem?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:41 AM
-1

The youtube link is a top voted item in MR right now...
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:33 AM
6

The traffic doesn't bother you?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:32 AM
1

Okay. If everything in your comment was meant literally then I don't know why you wrote it. I mean, 2013 of course some women work in trades and of course some get injured.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:34 AM
6

Especially when it's legal for legitimate hate groups to physically attack you. Um, what? I see the MRM as being more passive in nature How do we get the message out?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:02 AM
-1

Oh, sorry, I didn't realize you were trolling.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:53 AM
12

A bunch of named women "commemorating" the sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of men who fought and died in that battle... is an insult to those men and to all men. Well to be fair, their wives and mothers were the real victims. ^^<sup>/s</sup>
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:52 AM
3

women tend to have orgasms or become sexually stimulated as the child moves through the vagina [citation needed]
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:45 AM
1

You forgot your /s
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:44 AM
1

Retarded. Women have hormones to help them cope with labor (note: unless they're induced. That's nasty shit). They're also experiencing pain for a reward, whereas these men are just tormented for fun.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:42 AM
3

This is one of many laws which together make living illegal. When everyone is a criminal, prosecutors can jail whomever they please.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:41 AM
2

No title necessary, the author speaks for herself Wrong. Why are you linking to casinotop10?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:35 AM
1

It can take a couple of months for a woman's period to stop during pregnancy Never heard that one.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:33 AM
1

Conflating feminism with religion might play well with atheists, but it alienates some men. We don't need to divide our community like this.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:31 AM
3

As a man, no child of mine is playing football. Same with boxing. They can take up soccer or wrestling if they want, those are less-injurious alternatives and fun.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:29 AM
10

Well you're pretty much baiting them to censor you but that's against the policy here. You're really not going to overpower feminism if you try to divide men between left and right. We need to work together because there are a LOT of feminists out there.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:27 AM
-3

Yeah, I can't remember the last time I saw an MR protest.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:15 AM
7

Impotent? Why do you think that?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:09 AM
1

This article explains the situation much better. Actually I posted that to news over here -- just don't spoil the fun.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:54 PM
13

Great news, when do the adoption agency folks go to jail?
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:51 PM
5

100 pound females take out armies QUITE routinely. don’t think we should shape our YA fiction that way – i.e. telling lies to the young. those who buy the culture lock, stock and barrel don’t reproduce. TL;DR summary. 'twas an entertaining read so read it yourself :-) When you raise your own kids, remember the most capable people understand reality. If you're caught up in a fantasy you're bound to make poor choices. Super women and dumb evil men is a fantasy which allows other countries and cult…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:47 PM
17

I couldn't agree more. Men don't need to embrace victimhood. Yes there are many injustices against men (90% of our submissions are about it) but we are strong and can fix the system without making victimhood our identity.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:30 PM
1

far to complicated to be painted black and white. Yeah that's why I posted it. Hoping for a debate.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:16 PM
0

We're talking about Rapists right? If it were less than 1% I'd call it an anomaly. If more than 15% I'd say the government was outlawing being human. I really have a problem with outlawing common behavior, it's like criminalizing everyone (in combination with other broad laws). In the middle I'd call it almost normal but criminal behavior.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:10 PM
24

You're very lucky to get advance warning of a lawsuit. You're doubly lucky to have money. Spend it now or spend more later. Here's what you do. Get a record of every version of everything she said about the incident. Any way you can get your hands on it. Every inconsistency counts. Do this before she gets the kinks worked out of her story. Before she reminds everyone how you used to carry date rape drugs as well as acid. Before anyone remembers you bragging about it. Hire a good, clever lawyer. …
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:23 AM
18

Our legal system imagines that Child support and custody are decided on the best interests of the Child. Parents aren't really considered. Some points to consider: For some reason sperm banks don't require Child Support. Mother lying to the government to protect the father is criminal in some states. Father can't force an abortion, why is he on the hook? People have sex who don't want kids. That's humans for you. Why is sex a request to get fucked over? Child support is a perverse incentive for …
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:35 AM
2

You underestimate the percent of non-rapists. I understand what you've said, but saying "at least 3/4 of men are not rapists" isn't helping our case.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:29 AM
4

Worst post of the day award. We don't denigrate women in here.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:23 AM
2

Nobody knows, but let's play an estimation game for fun. What percent of men: Seek out women with intent to rape? Would rape given the opportunity? (e.g. passed out woman on your bed) Act with integrity but never get consent in writing? The first category are Rapists. The second category have a sex drive stronger than their morality or empathy. The third are, at worst, "accidental rapists" if their partner neglects to tell them NO when she didn't want sex. I'm ignoring gays here. My guesses are:…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:15 AM
2

Way to underestimate.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:07 AM
2

2:30:37? That's pretty damned long. Also repost
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:12 AM
1

You're kind-of-wrong but don't deserve the downvotes.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:09 AM
3

Defriended? Lucky break for you!
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:08 AM
3

It's bad both ways, and shows a complete lack of understanding of male psychology. Homophobic men aren't afraid of getting raped. Only a woman would think that, because it's so clueless. This shows one major problem with feminism. They start with their theories and apply it to everything. Feminists hate men. Why? Because rape. Rape must be why men fear gay. Come on.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:06 AM
1

It sure does belong in WTF.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:55 AM
1

With a title like that, you'll mostly hear from the MGTOW crowd. They sit at the far extreme of opinions on the matter; many of them won't even get involved with women. It's never healthy to follow extremists. Weigh the costs and benefits. It only starts to make sense when you have kids. Consider what happens if one of you ends up in the hospital, or dies. Consider health insurance costs and employer family discounts. And get involved with MRA to change the system.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:51 AM
1

the question of whether they enjoy feminisms larger consequences is too much of a logical leap to be within reach of her rationalization hamster wheel That's where I stopped reading. He's talking about women here, not just feminists. Remember, we're better than the feminists here. We don't need this shit.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:12 AM
6

according to the U.S. Census Bureau you only count as one of those if you have gone 52 weeks of the previous year without making any income. In fact, just looking for job, even part-time or freelance work, means you’re no longer a “stay-at-home dad,” you’re just an unemployed member of the “work force” and acting as temporary “primary caregiver” in the meantime. The US Census cares far more about employment numbers than stay-at-home dad statistics. We're caught in their blind spot.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:10 AM
19

Love it.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:58 AM
5

MRM exists to change that, not to give up.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:47 AM
2

open a recording app on your smartphone and discreetly record everything That's illegal in many states. Otherwise good advice.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:45 AM
0

Hypocrisy in politics is not an MR issue.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:34 AM
7

Alright, terrible argument. Let me rip into it... To the problem you find in assuming that a person in charge would, or would not care about the other gender, that could certainly be quantified by the rights and privileges assigned to one, but not the other gender, and also by the fact that, indeed both sexes have been oppressed under most governments. Yes, that's one sentence. No, it has no meaning. Really, study it. It's an entire paragraph of one sentence with no meaning. You may not have 100…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:16 AM
5

What's with all the bible quotes and what does that have to do with either side of the debate? Honestly feminists aren't exactly bible thumpers and neither is GWW.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:41 AM
3

leading to unfair acquittals by jurors raised to believe that no matter what the law says, "real rape" is defined by the cases deemed worthy of prosecution. Does that make sense to anyone? Anonymous will continue to gain traction on injustice in rape cases Yeah, anonymous incendiary accusations. That's healthy justice. Wendy Murphy is an adjunct law professor at New England Law/Boston where she has taught a seminar on sexual violence for more than a decade. A lawyer and impact litigator whose wo…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:36 AM
1

Screening for sexual conversion? Like, crotch stitches?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:26 AM
3

children are sent into unsupervised visitation The horror. The most tragic cases involve situations where the protective parent is demonized and custody is awarded to the offender. Yeah, we've been saying that. Too bad the victims here are men and children. I wonder if CACAA is full of shit. Let's check their website... “Mommy HELP me! He hurts me and he hurts my brother. Mommy! I want my Mommy..." That's in big letters on their home page. More like batshit crazy.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:20 AM
10

boy gets pissed off by this and decides to try to smash her face in So, boxing? She could always yell, "STOP". Or maybe "ease up". Escalating the conflict is usually interpreted as an invitation to hit harder.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:01 AM
2

That's the different between thrifty and cheap. A cheap person ends up spending far more in the long run, because they're "penny wise and pound foolish".
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:13 AM
2

It's so much cheaper just to pay for it. If 1% of those kids are born unwanted, go on to become criminals, you get to pay for jail time and police. Unless you have a way to avoid those costs?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:27 AM
2

Click "other discussions" above and upvote if you like.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:20 AM
0

Yeah. Well it's still a good story. What's GoT?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:19 AM
-15

Well you've won this thread, I guess every dog has his day. I'll see you in comments another day, when hopefully I haven't responded to the angry guy thread.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:12 AM
-21

Man I don't know what forum you're on but I see feminists in nearly every article submitted here. There's just more men than women on this reddit.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:04 AM
3

I generally like your ideas, but I think I can do better. Let's start with some presuppositions: Global and National populations will decline. We can't stop it but we appreciate extra babies to blunt the effects on the economy. For example, can you imagine how social security would fare? The worst outcome for society is a baby born to parents who don't want it. This poor child is likely subject to abuse and neglect, leading to a life of early crime and violence. Most any other option is preferab…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:40 AM
0

Tell me, who is going to read your comment and feel sympathetic to your point?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:21 AM
1

Didn't I see this the other week? Once again this doesn't help discussion because you can't send anyone a link to the swapped page.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:15 AM
3

'It takes, quite simply, longer time with women,' said Connie Mikkelsen, chairwoman of the Danish organisation for independent hairdressers and cosmeticians. Discrimination with a clear and practical reason is okay. Anyways, aren't you a huge libertarian? Why do you celebrate government getting involved in this?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:11 AM
2

I think you need to paste the text here. If nothing else, use 4 spaces before each line.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:09 AM
13

Nobody likes shit, but shit happens hits the fan. It used to be up to men to shovel it. Now there's just as much shit but twice the population to clean it up. Remember to vote against pro-war candidates next round.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:03 AM
2

Thanks. I thought it would be really obvious without /s too.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:56 AM
0

Well I see little reason to believe our prison system would reform anyone, but there's always the punishment angle. 15 years is a long time to dwell on one's actions.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:55 AM
-30

NAFALTers will get back to you, as soon as they finish consulting with the magical egalitarian feminist unicorns that fart rainbows of equality around the world. I'm not sure what NAFALT is but that's quite the smear. That's about one step away from the hate speech charge UTSU leveled against aVfM.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:49 AM
1

English - Loved it, exclusively taught by women. Computing - Hated it. Exclusively taught by men. Almost sounds like you agree with me. Regardless, some children do respond better to one gender or the other, and variety gives each child the best chance. This has nothing to do with sexism. Some infants prefer one gender or the other, and they haven't been taught. Some children respond better to one teaching style or another, and again I advocate variety. Read your post and mine and ask yourself w…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:13 AM
0

This story just doesn't make sense. I'd like to hear the other side.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:42 AM
2

Yeah, but they'd call you a slut so it comes out even.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:35 AM
1

So you propose a Woman's Party and a Man's Party. You realize there are more women than men, right? This is doubly true for seniors who are the most likely to vote.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:23 AM
2

Good point.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:21 AM
2

The MR plan is to not talk about this movie and hope it bombs.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:18 AM
2

The theory behind Roe v. Wade is that a woman can't be forced to carry a child if she doesn't want to, until a certain point. Most Americans agree with that idea. The MR angle is while the father can't force an abortion, he shouldn't be forced to pay if he doesn't want the kid.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:17 AM
1

There's a woman who doesn't care about herself or others.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:08 AM
6

Either convince her to seek therapy or just leave. If you want the kid, document the violence for use in court.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:05 AM
5

I agree. Why does everyone demand life in prison for everything? People are punished, maybe even reformed, then they've paid their debt and can continue as productive members of society. Or they can try.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:02 AM
-1

Don't give up, you can still be a feminist! You just need to kindle your inner hate and stop thinking for yourself. I see way too much thinking for yourself here.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:00 AM
3

That first quote is rather twisted logic if you think about it. She thinks income proves value, but also thinks women are worth more than they're paid. She can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:53 AM
6

Men and fathers have a lot of influence. Courts should consider this when assigning custody. I think male teachers also have a lot of influence, and I'd like to see more of them.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:47 AM
7

Crazy horny lady doesn't make good MRM reading.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:45 AM
0

I did not intend to start a productive conversation Clearly. Why did you come to MR at all?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:38 AM
97

I doubt they think at all. They just hate.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:36 AM
-3

That's a snarky and condescending response and it makes me feel angry. My personal education experience includes about 45 female teachers. That's anecdotal evidence but enough to start a conversation. Other people are able to add their own experiences to the conversation, just like you did. You didn't make any case for confirmation bias. To cut this conversation short, I'll admit that I didn't write what I meant to write in my comment above. I mangled my point entirely. Even if I had meant what …
/r/MensRights23/01/13 01:06 AM
1

Nobody will read this, but the poster has terrible advice. Don't get physical, that's just asking for more violence. If you see people behaving badly, for example a couple having a fight that's started to get physical, you don't need to run over there. Stand a distance away (like across the street) and say loudly, "I'm over here watching." A little self consciousness is all most people need to stop their bad behavior, and it's not likely to put you at risk. Also the poster is sexist but people a…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:37 PM
0

I guess both genders can lie... but somehow it's still a guy taking the fall.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:29 PM
6

what the fuck does it matter that there are less men teaching than women? I care because if I have children, I want them to have a variety of teachers and teaching styles. Some children respond much better to male or female teachers, and they deserve the chance to blossom.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:55 PM
3

but it seems plausible obvious.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:50 PM
-9

In my education, exactly one female teacher fit your description.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:49 PM
1

I won't argue against that. Wait until they graduate at least.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:43 PM
-3

Where straight and gay male interests coincide, you're quite welcome. Where your issues differ, we'll sympathize but not do very much. This is what's great about men. We'll be honest upfront. I personally hope you live in a gay friendly area with gay rights groups to help with those problems.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 10:02 AM
3

I'd read that if the text wasn't tiny.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:33 AM
2

If he's 17 now, how old was he when they had sex? Many states consider 16 old enough, though a student/teacher relationship is a big problem.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:32 AM
3

virtually any American is at risk of prosecution should a prosecutor decide that they are, in Jackson’s words, a person “he should get.” Of course, nobody wants to "get" those evil women, so it falls on men.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 12:34 AM
1

There's no male pill because it hasn't been invented yet. This isn't because nobody is trying. There are a number of efforts on to find a pill to stop sperm without killing you or damaging your future sperm. Women's bodies have a natural mechanism to stop reproduction, triggered whenever they get pregnant. Nature did the hard work for us. Men have no such mechanism, so researchers have to find a hack that doesn't also kill us. This isn't an MR issue at all, it's a research problem.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:36 AM
1

It's a hypothetical survey. No indication that women are actually chasing rich men on the slops.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:19 AM
1

Part of me hopes she wins, just to force a conversation and explicit laws against this.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:35 AM
1

in hopes that eventually it won't be retarded. ?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:33 AM
2

It's the military, they have practical concerns. Some people just aren't that strong, and shouldn't be hauling gear around all day. There's a lot of jobs that need doing, and assigning the right people without 'fairness' helps get them done.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:06 AM
13

Was it a feminist channel? They're often like that. Otherwise it's a reminder how pervasive feminism is.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:01 AM
5

I've heard that it's hard for men's shelters to raise money. Do you have a plan for that? Facilities, power, staff all cost money.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:59 AM
1

Plenty of men are convicted of the same crime with the same range of punishments. What she actually gets is another matter.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:49 AM
1

Doucet "considered for seven months having her husband killed, paid a 'hit man' $25,000 to do the job, and, when that failed, attempted twice more to arrange for her husband's demise." source Wow.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:32 AM
1

Can I have your complete price list, please?
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:14 AM
5

I wouldn't call HuffPo a respectable publication.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:10 AM
1

Generally A, but it depends on circumstances.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:36 AM
5

They're all too easy to miss :-(
/r/MensRights18/01/13 07:44 AM
1

You already got 10 of the same stock answer plus two trolls. For variety let's try old school. No child support required by law. No obligation ever. This means women need to find reliable men, just like they used to. They have to use their judgement, just like they used to. They need to try in their marriage, just like they used to. Women can still sleep around, but the whole birth control bit is on them. Men don't need to worry about it. Men don't need to get snipped. Men don't have to wonder i…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:23 AM
1

if "the best interests of the child" were an important factor, abortion would be illegal WOAH, stop right there. No child should be born to parents who don't want him. That's begging for neglect, abuse, and poverty.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:00 AM
2

NDAA - National District Attorneys Association. They're prosecutors. They exist to get convictions, just as the police exist to arrest and gather evidence for convictions. If the Aaron Swartz case didn't let you know, they have a wide latitude and can usually do whatever they want for whatever reason they want. But mostly they want a ton of convictions because it makes them look competent.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:57 AM
4

So... the only kind that's around?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:48 AM
2

Save some sperm first, people change their minds later. Vasectomies aren't always reversible.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:41 AM
4

I read 20 top comments. Almost all claimed he was an asshole.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:38 AM
11

I should've made this clear: he had a choice between two papers to sign - both would waive his parental rights. One said that he admitted he was the biological father and the other denied any fatherhood. He chose to sign the latter. Why would he sign up to get fucked by the system if it doesn't effect anyone else? Who's to say he's even the father?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:32 AM
1

Brilliant solution!
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:02 AM
2

Most important story of the week. Why did 18 people downvote this?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:59 AM
0

So they have basic common sense?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:49 AM
2

And right they are to do so.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:48 AM
1

The author's definition of "score" seems to jump from happiness to who does more work to who gets more money. A prenuptual agreement does not "predetermine the score" for anything except money.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:47 AM
0

They're still children. Children make mistakes but there's no reason to ruin their adult lives.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:26 AM
4

Touching article but more importantly, there was a murder victim?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:24 AM
1

If the person is a reasoning Feminist ... look around for a pot of gold and get back over the rainbow quickly.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:15 AM
6

I couldn't follow that video at all. I expect she was punished if the video shows false testimony.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:11 AM
1

The article uses the passive voice when describing the accident. That's a bit sexist, but yawn.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:49 AM
12

I can't imagine how these people get through life. I suspect they're the lonely, single basement dwellers they accuse us of being. Regardless, just ignore them. If it's somehow not obvious from their sidebar text, the SRS subs were all founded as pure hate groups.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:47 AM
1

Physical appearance (clothing, make up, etc) I disagree with this. Women "have to" look good all the time, show skin even when it's freezing, keep thin and fit, and use makeup. That takes a lot of time and I can't imagine it's pleasant. As a man I do none of that unless I damned well want to. As a man it's far easier to control my weight, though I can do just fine with 50 extra pounds. I think I'm ahead on this one. And if I want to wear a goddamned dress, I'll own it. But not in the winter; it'…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:37 AM
1

Man you leave a lot of angry comments. You're very quick to assume and often you're just mean, but you're always angry. When you denounce people, you never leave facts or help correct what they got wrong. I wish you'd try to help the cause rather than just yelling all the time.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:28 AM
0

There's no way to become a Doctor, Engineer, or Lawyer without a University.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:16 AM
6

Who downvoted this? It's not that simple.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:59 AM
3

You should. Maybe tell folks about the Vatican 2 divide.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:04 AM
2

Right up until they hook up with a hottie way beyond their level. Then they stay :-) Oops, one less man to hook up with.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:59 PM
12

The Catholic church values traditional gender roles and thus opposes feminism. Just because feminists have some leftist values does not make all leftist values feminist.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:52 PM
5

How are women being victimized by men? Are you asking me? They aren't.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:50 PM
1

No. Bank account in both names, he's not a victim.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:39 PM
1

Depends on the judge.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:37 PM
1

I called [the cops], and they said that without a location, they can't do anything about it. They can damned well take the report. Get the report number and save it. When the victims come after you, refer them to the police. Be sure they record that she knows the account is closed. If possible, serve the divorce papers to her jail cell.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:34 PM
1

It's an insult. Use it only against people you can't possibly reason with.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:30 PM
0

I somehow didn't get the problem there.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:28 PM
1

In a divorce, you need practical advice, not a political cause to fight for.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:21 PM
1

I agree with his critics. The message is lost because his tone is annoying. It's okay to be angry, if you present it the right way. Look at Rush or Beck for example. This is constructive criticism; he can do better. Record some very short videos and play them back for your sister or friends for feedback.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:10 PM
1

Maybe, depends how young they are I guess. Even I would question 18-22 year olds getting married.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:01 PM
1

The best answer is to place a sign next to the poster: "Why does this poster need to belittle men?" Some unoffensive awareness is a good thing.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:00 PM
1

What if a white man said to a black man, "You're a credit to your race"? What if a coach said to a white athlete, "You can try out, but black kids are always better"? Those are unintentionally offensive.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:59 PM
1

A simple checklist. It's always okay to be offended if: It belittles or insults a group Group has been subject to discrimination Message could be achieved without insult It lacks sufficient redeeming qualities
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:53 PM
2

Rocking Mr E, Please fix your microphone. Holy fuck that distorted echo is annoying.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:41 PM
2

I was recently smeared by MGTOW crowd when I argued that marriage has pros as well as cons, so long as you're having kids. They called me a traditionalist. Do you hate me?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:25 PM
1

I understand that the Church broke the European tribes throughout the middle ages and later periods. They did this by outlawing marriage of anyone you were related to, which forced mingling with more distant folks. At one point you couldn't even marry your 6th cousin.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:21 PM
1

Why? The main problem is the threat of divorce.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:18 PM
-5

your average man was not able to vote until until the late 1800s. Before then it was only landowners. This is bullshit. All white men were permitted to vote since our country was founded. Land had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:16 PM
1

The Gaggle (website) champions “non-dates,” including the “group non-date” and the “networking non-date.” It's like you have to arrange to have a casual place to catch each others eye. Bars used to serve this purpose.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:11 PM
3

Dating changes every generation. If men are looking for a girl who fits in with his friends, he's thinking smart! Probably smarter than my generation where if she didn't put out, I didn't call her back. What really matters more, poontang or a girl who won't push away your friends?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:06 PM
1

Extremists make the moderates look more reasonable. I don't like the guy but maybe he's a useful idiot.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:04 PM
19

Good article but your title isn't very gripping so it probably won't get much attention. Also 3 years old. “A lot of my friends will meet someone and go home for the night and just hope for the best the next morning,” Ms. Lynch said. “They’ll text them and say: ‘I had a great time. Want to hang out next week?’ And they don’t respond.” Sucks when your "rare commodity" is common. Women [...] are being victimized by men precisely because they have outperformed them Such bias. Women are being victim…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:39 AM
1

So people choose traditional or gender neutral service? Where's the problem?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:37 AM
22

No surprise, the Catholic are allergic to feminism.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:33 AM
2

GREAT video. Really deep and introspective. Best thing I've seen all week.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:03 AM
2

Quoth the article: A belief that women's rights are more important than men's rights. (It doesn't. It does advocate more for women's rights, but that's largely because women in fact have fewer rights in most -- but not all -- things.) A belief that women are absolutely equal to men in all ways. (It doesn't. The vast majority of feminists believe, for example, that the average man is stronger than the average woman and that this is a genetic fact.) A belief that men are bad, evil, or out to harm …
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:21 AM
2

Turn that around and see how they like it. "Do you support equal rights for men? Then you're an MRM supporter! WELCOME! COME JOIN US. JOIN US."
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:19 AM
3

I love how you got 2 downvotes for answering his question.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:17 AM
0

The title above is a quote from the article.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:16 AM
13

Looked fine to me. Everyone was disgusted with her behavior, nobody criticized him. At one point I think people were concerned that he was going to crush her face, but that's because nobody wants that sort of escalation.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:07 AM
1

Page 24 table 18? 68.8% of male victims are sexually assaulted by female staff (only). I wonder what that consists of, exactly, but that's asking too much.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:14 AM
1

Good reading. I wish you had a top level comment. "The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim." I wonder if a lawyer would agree.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:05 AM
1

citation?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:48 AM
1

Yeah, without cultural background this wouldn't be so bad. When men are arrested for calling the cops because their wife is throwing things at them, it's a lot less funny. I find it tasteless but then I'm not angry harry.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:36 AM
1

reddit ate my first reply. I don't think I said what you think I said.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:09 AM
1

I don't think I said that. I'm not even sure what you're saying exactly.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:05 AM
2

Well, even the feminists rate the USA as #4 globally.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:54 AM
1

Do they allow men to volunteer?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:45 AM
1

Do us all a favor and file suit if you have a real case. Closing a sexist center leaves more room for an equal one.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:44 AM
2

I appreciate your writeup, but I find it more helpful to classify accusations as malicious, not-rape, and rape. Malicious false accusations are cases where the complainant knew there wasn't rape. Not-rape are cases where the accuser had a complaint but it didn't amount to rape. Sadly it doesn't seem like we can know what percentage of those "false" accusations were considered malicious.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:39 AM
2

Good post; helps the conversation. I find it interesting to compare these numbers: 13% of rape reports result in conviction 12.5% of rape reports are believed false Right down the middle. I guess we just don't know about the other 74.5%. My guess is the remaining 56% of cases that don't lead to prosecution are rife with not-rape of whatever form.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:28 AM
1

Obviously yes, but still not worth reading.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:20 AM
1

Story time. Bonus points if you post police reports.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:18 AM
1

You think? I blame media fear mongering. Same story with Halloween candy..
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:18 AM
1

A lot of bad news out of France recently. I hope nobody here lives in France.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:14 AM
2

it presumes that the choice to enter into the contract was freely made and not the product of coercion, or of deliberation between two unfavorable options. This was your best point, and you're exactly right. If you want kids, it becomes a question of how you can afford care for and how to protect your family from whatever might happen. Taxes, insurance costs, medical decisions in case of severe injury, and inheritance all strongly favor marriage. OTOH divorce is awful. Thus two unfavorable optio…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:02 AM
2

I support this if you don't have kids, but you didn't answer his question.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:57 AM
1

It seems we don't completely disagree, but still have more to discuss. If you can't marry her why would you want to entrust your medical decisions to her? I argue that I can marry her, and that's because I trust her. I think it is you who needs to pay attention. You don't need to buy insurance for a wife you don't have, and if you have adopted children. Wife or not she still needs health insurance. Hospital delivery costs $10,000 if everything goes perfectly, and who knows how much when it doesn…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:56 AM
1

That's a bit harsh and stretches the truth at times. Even if she requested the removal we still don't know what really happened.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:32 AM
2

Why do you need parental rights if you don't plan on having any children. I want kids. Marriage makes sense if you're having kids. My parents and siblings have hospital visitation rights as well as my medical proxy. That's great if you trust them more than your wife. Of course, which person gets to make decisions? What if they disagree? Do they really know you all that well? It's a lot clearer with a trustworthy wife who really knows you. Honestly I'd prefer a medical professional to be controll…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:24 AM
1

Oh, have I ever met feminists in real life. I don't like to antagonize people but I respond when pressed with bad arguments. I have an interest in evo-bio research and that really butts up against assumptions made by young and ignorant feminists. I've also had a decent number of people volunteer that they disliked feminists (mostly the student variety) and found them annoying. The reddit variety fit this mold as well, and I suspect they're mostly students, young, and ignorant. I personally disli…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:40 AM
3

I'm not mad since you were willing to listen.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:33 AM
0

Who said anything about kids? Kids are the best reason for marriage. Some of us want kids, and some of us want to take care of them. Shame on you for denigrating those choices. Did I say some? I meant most.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:32 AM
1

Good research, but I wonder what really happened. Scenario A: Editor tells her to pull the story or get canned. Scenario B: Feminists contact her and threaten smear campaign if she doesn't pull the story. Scenario C: She wrote the story but had a change of heart and requested it be pulled. The editors were shocked but granted the request.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:30 AM
1

quote from a man about his experiences with women and just believed and respected it. Well it was a guest post not written by Jill.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:19 AM
2

I read the article and some comments. I didn't see anything awful; just a lot of bad ideas. I'm sure glad the legal system doesn't work like feminists: I thought that one of the desired behaviors of feminist-behaving-people was that the benefit of the doubt is given to the victim, rather than placing the onus of proof and skepticism on the victim? I liked this comment: you don’t want to be bothered with pleasuring another or because you just aren’t into sex, then you really need to be very clear…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:10 AM
1

Most people have a negative association with "feminists". Let them keep their well deserved reputation.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:48 AM
3

It's not worth posting to this reddit. The other Bill Burr posts were actually relevant, this one wasn't.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:44 AM
1

Unfortunately this seems like a core tenant of their beliefs.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:41 AM
0

There's a lot of shit in a lot of places. Let's stick closer to home. Unless we have a bunch of Russians who live in Russia?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:36 AM
1

No idea, but why would we end up the same?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:34 AM
1

What does that have to do with MR? Athiem+ is some hybrid feminist atheist group. The suggestion is to: create a new subreddit focused on this one's original purpose?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:29 AM
-5

This video wasn't worthwhile.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:18 AM
-3

There are a lot of pros and cons to marriage. You're familiar with the cons so I'll discuss the pros. You'll have parental rights over your children if your wife dies. Inheritance of shared assets if your wife dies. Income tax deductions (depending on circumstances). They add up. Hospital visitation rights in case of accident. Control over medical decisions in case of accident. Your employer pays part of your wife/childrens health insurance. Easiest legal path for your life insurance to pay your…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:00 AM
3

What a bunch of retards. Men lie about their income. Great way to get a gold digger. Women lie about their income, great way to make the guy feel inferior. She lied about her weight online? That's going to come out pretty quickly. Dumb-asses deserve each other, and they're well on their way.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:44 AM
2

You're right to be slightly annoyed.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:39 AM
1

Nice.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:39 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:36 AM
1

Here's an idea. Criticize through faint praise and leave the sarcasm out. Don't link to anything but let them think on it. For example: Domestic Violence: 49% of abusers are now eligible for arrest. RAPE: allegations are up 70%. Keep fighting! Did you know, men only pay Alimony in 93% of cases? Legal reform NOW! Women now make 62% of University Admissions. Keep up the pressure! My numbers are all SOMA so do your own research. Keep it legit.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:30 AM
0

People do stupid shit. He served his time and is repentant. End of story.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:06 AM
1

One must ask why so many of our patients within a span of a few years, suddenly and in such high numbers, have been labeled as traumatized. Psychology has always been prone to fads. Most of the field has been pseudo-science and much of it still is. That doesn't mean they're malicious or worth our attention.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:02 AM
1

Why post an article we can't read? Also, regardless of the conclusions, I have no idea how to interpret such a thing.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:59 AM
3

You're 6 months from graduating. Focus on graduating with high grades and don't rock the boat too much. Instead, gather specific examples and write an article on the University's anti-intellectual approach to education. If it's legal in your state, bring a recorder to class and when you speak to faculty. Otherwise take detailed notes. California is a "two party consent" state so you can't secretly record private conversations. Shaming a university as anti-intellectual is probably the worst thing…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:56 AM
-4

This might be true but it's rude to actually say it.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:38 AM
2

Guys, James pushes our buttons because he's a victim and he denies that men have a basic right to self defense. But you know what? This is part of his recovery process and the guy needs to heal. Let's not dwell on this; go easy on him and do what we can to support him. Remember, we're all in this together.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:35 AM
1

Are you actually James? You made your choice and it was yours to make, and I won't criticize you for it. What I do have a problem with is your repeated statements that self defense using whatever means necessary is wrong. If an attacker pushes a victim such that a "flat-out beat down" is their last option, that's on the attacker.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:24 AM
2

Self defense is always a human right.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:14 AM
3

I don't hear that word often. When I hear it, on one hand I think of Sweden and Norway, and on the other I suspect it's code for university admission quotas.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:08 AM
3

I think RES allows for that. Alternately use adblock with custom settings.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:05 AM
1

Respect.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:02 AM
4

Whether it's a fetish or her real opinion, what matters is whether you're compatible with her. You'll have to figure that one out. If you're not compatible, work towards an equitable divorce but CYA financially because most women are wallet rapers. For the record, most kinky/fetish people are completely fine and well adjusted.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:00 AM
4

The biggest victim is clearly the "father". The children got a chance at life when they otherwise wouldn't have, and got a father figure until their teenage years. They're well ahead of the game.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:51 AM
-1

It's the same as rape if you ask me.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:39 AM
2

So cross post it.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:29 AM
3

TL;DR ? That is one mess of a web page.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:27 AM
3

Why don't you have a user page?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:22 AM
3

I don't know. I've seen my submissions still visible by link, but invisible via any other means.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:18 AM
-1

Wow, MaunaLoona is a bad person.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:02 AM
5

I've seen mods do that before. I doubt it was the admins.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:01 AM
12

Someone with spare time should create a reddit for the moderate folks from both sides (however few that may be) to talk. I say someone with spare time because you'd need a lot of vigilance to keep the extremists out.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 07:10 AM
3

She means it doesn't give enough ammo to throw at fathers. The legal definition of domestic violence is too limiting and doesn't include being cheap, "controlling" the thermostat, or making your kid too tired. All examples from the article.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:03 AM
3

"insisted that chores be done in a certain way. He even controlled the thermostat", she said. - her complaints that hubby was controlling. Hilarious. "It has to do with control . . . When you control the keys to the car and check [your wife's] cell phone to see if she's having an affair, that's control." - Commissioner Ponomarchuk (a family court Judge explaining domestic violence) The divorce should solve that problem. he too is a victim, calling his persecutors a "homegrown hate group of men .…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:31 PM
1

What can be done about this? Serious question. Maybe some locals could protest outside the family courthouse.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:13 PM
2

I'm rolling my eyes so hard right now. This will become law we'll all be ice skating in hell. Why are we even discussing it?
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:53 PM
2

r/askHistorians or r/askSocialScience
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:21 AM
8

A false allegation, malicious or accidental, is devastating to the accused. I care about all falsely accused. The only difference is that malicious accusations deserve punishment, while most accidental accusations don't.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:19 AM
0

It's hard to nail a liar, so if they can figure out 42% of accusations are lies, the real number is clearly higher. Still, I advise you to only use the 42% number to counter someone using the 2% number.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:17 AM
-1

One problem with this chart is that it makes people think the system doesn't punish rapists. That subtly encourages more rape, and it encourages vigilante violence against accused rapists. That's evil.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 12:37 AM
1

Good explanation but I don't believe it myself.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:30 PM
1

Identity theft is illegal in terms of financial fraud and Government ID. Lying for sex is almost always legal.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:10 AM
1

Will diversity training give anyone a better understanding of the chemical reaction? The teachers take the 'diversity training' to help them treat students equally. That doesn't sound too bad. It's not a conspiracy, it's a fact. A conspiracy means that people coordinated to achieve a common goal. Is that what you think happened here? I'd guess that these were all reasonable sounding ideas adopted for different reasons. We should probably reconsider those choices, but calling it a conspiracy with…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:08 AM
1

Yes it does. Is it untrue, though? I don't see a ton of women doing BIG RISKY things, and I think it's because they have other priorities in life. Again, some do, and that's just fine by me.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:04 AM
1

Not only that but parents favor their female offspring as well. I'm not sure I believe that part, but why do you think they'd prefer the girls? Biologically speaking girls are a safe reproductive bet, and boys are a high stakes gamble you'd better pay attention to.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:01 AM
1

Tell ya what, find a few local drug dealers and ask them for GHB. If they have some, it's being used. To avoid trouble, don't bring any money at all.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:59 AM
1

If you willingly take GHB in public you're pretty well asking for trouble. If you take too much alcohol and then actually consent to sex, you're pretty well asking for sex. Either way, you know what you're getting into when you partake. You could argue that she can't consent while drunk, but it's a common and predicable outcome of drinking that much at a bar. It's been that way since EtOH was discovered. To avoid this, go out with a reliable friend, or don't over-indulge, or drink in a safe plac…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:58 AM
6

OMG sexism! ;-)
/r/MensRights07/01/13 08:22 AM
3

Good, informative comment.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:57 AM
2

Low risk actually, but way more risk than he deserved.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:56 AM
6

Remember, we're all in this together. Don't start dividing us.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 12:50 AM
2

Pretty crazy how people act. Why do you think they act this way? What should we do about it?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 07:12 AM
1

Do you think that's really true? I think ads are really negative towards women.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:01 AM
1

What if she knowingly and willingly took GHB while out at a bar? Often women will drink before hooking up, and it was entirely their choice, but some regret it the next morning. I'd say if she did the same with GHB and got laid then she'd stupid but not a victim.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:18 AM
1

That's the job a judge does. Maybe you'd like to get involved with replacing bad local judges in elections.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:14 AM
1

This was specific and sytematically done to achive the effect we see today. A malicious conspiracy? I gotta hear the proof for that one. ..PC propaganda. Humanities, social science What do you have against social science? To teach college level chemistry you need racial diversity training, along with a host of other humanities and social studies Probably the school trying to be fair to all students.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:13 AM
-1

People argued this a hundred+ years ago and decided that pretending to be someone else wasn't rape. Generally, lying isn't outlawed in our society, so why here? If they outlawed lying to get laid, half our nation would be in jail.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:07 AM
10

You forgot to apply critical thinking! The skill that matters the most in regards to how teachers graded their students is what we refer to as 'approaches toward learning'... Teachers, of their own free will, choose to assign grades based on female personality traits. So, while boys might get better grades on the actual work, they lack a female personality and thus get lower grades on their report cards. Those grades prevent them from getting into advanced classes in high school. That is the ver…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 01:48 AM
3

It sounds like Atheism+ is very feminist and against men's rights. Instead of removing their attacks, just make their history and bias more obvious to the casual reader. I suggest making a new account for that.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:29 PM
6

You can send this if you like. Ken Herman, You ended your recent article, "Men and guns and mass murder" with a hate filled rant. You spent the rest of the article explaining why it's okay to post such bile. The truth is, just because you often go out of your way to offend people doesn't justify going out of your way to offend people. There are ways to start a discussion without looking like an ass. To answer the argument you so crassly printed, men are the do-ers of the world. If something big …
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:12 PM
14

Hint: discrimination by female teachers.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:46 PM
1

Why do you say the evidence was flimsy? I still oppose cutting, but the evidence sounded strong to me.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:46 PM
1

Here's the post they're talking about. If you post angry over there, you'll be modded to oblivion. Just sayin'. A few good quotes to get things started: Let me guess. This is all going to come down to some kind of thing where when the girls underperform, we change the school, and when the boys underperform, we change the boys. -- Boys have a tendency to "Like Learning" later in life, once they have a better understanding of their physical world. This does not mean Girls are smarter than Boys, or…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:03 PM
-10

From the article, “The challenge with developing the male pill isn’t rendering the sperm infertile, but turning them back on again.” Permanent infertility for guys. Sounds like a dream for some unhinged feminist. Are guys going to have to watch their drinks at bars?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:38 AM
0

Conversation starts with feminist jstar complaining that young women dislike feminists, ends with jstar claiming that as many women as men are willing to work 80-120 hour per week jobs for 10-20 years straight. Somehow I'm downvoted, jstar is upvoted, which just goes to show how alive and well feminist propoganda is on reddit.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 03:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter