TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Karlo20 Archive

View 0 posts and 110 comments by Karlo20 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

You people are hyping up Trump to the point that even if he does become president he will only disappoint.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 02:10 PM
2

No you didn't, you handled this in the worst possible way.
/r/askTRP05/03/16 11:02 AM
3

Consider everything you just said about doing drugs can be applied to fucking.
/r/askTRP26/02/16 01:28 AM
1

I'd say to some amount both attributes are needed. No use being attractive if you don't have the personality to take advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 01:33 AM
1

my looks didn't change. I was working out just as much as before. So you were attractive enough to these girls to start with, just too limp-wristed to do anything about it at first, am I following you correctly? This is not the case with nice guys, most nice guys are not attractive enough for the girls they are going after.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 08:12 PM
1

Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 08:06 PM
1

So why do so many men on Reddit want to make it easier for him to contribute absolutely nothing at all, and fuck the kid over completely? There's no such thing as "contributing", this is a living breathing person, not some business project you can just throw money at and watch grow. The best environment to raise a child is in a stable secure household with one mother and one father, both attentive to the needs of the child and both there for the child when necessary. Anything short of this and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 03:13 AM
2

Nice guys are rejected because they are ugly, that's really all there is to it. The "they are not really nice" bollocks is completely made up by women so they can feel better about rejecting a perfectly good man because he is ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 03:07 AM
10

What I plan to bring to any relationship would be friendship, a willingness to talk things out when there is a disagreement, a willingness to change my mind, respect, loyalty, financial and emotional support, occasional grand romantic gestures, and encouragement to chase their dreams. If you ever want to know sadness of the greatest depth, read this back to yourself in 10-20 years
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 03:02 AM
3

What are you even trying to say here dude? How is that relevant to anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 02:50 AM
3

Of course, but the ordinary person's threshold of "too much" is a lot lower than most gym-goers would think.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 01:53 AM
1

I was under the impression that men could only get so big without drugs. You'd be right, we don't have an infinite amount of test coursing through our veins, the amount of muscle we can build and maintain is dependent upon how much test we produce. You will experience diminishing returns as a natural, to the point where once you have a certain amount of muscle you will simply not be able to build any more without handing in your natty card. As for natural bodybuilding, it's all a farce, they are…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 01:43 AM
-1

The reason young women are voting Sanders is the same reason anyone would vote Sanders. Greedy dumb liberals who just want free stuff without understanding the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 01:28 AM
1

Depends on your genetics, different people build muscle at different rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 01:23 AM
3

There is a sweet spot I believe, too much muscle looks gross to most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 01:19 AM
2

I would say they have the same SMV then.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 01:15 AM
2

If you make your life goal to have sex with all the women you can you will live an extremely fulfilling and wholesome life. /s Seriously now, all these PUA dudes are fucked up, just look at mystery now, look at Strauss, look at that dumbass Roosh. They should be all the proof you need that TRP and pickup should be kept at arms length, lest you be consumed by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 01:10 AM
5

What do they look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 12:52 AM
2

I mean assuming they're not doing it for juvenile reasons like that, out of interest, how old would you say these men are?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 10:18 PM
1

Again, what differentiates the two? if a guy were to shout "Hi, my name is ____. I like your hair/eyes/dress/whatever. Can I number." would that be a catcall and why?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 10:11 PM
2

I feel kind of like catcallers are somewhat good-intentioned in a way. Like they believe that women do in fact enjoy being catcalled.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 10:08 PM
2

Of course, I mean I agree with you. I just think you need to relax a little, maybe take a break from TRP or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 09:28 PM
2

Well the only real difference between the example you gave of being approached and the hypothetical i just posed was distance, this implies that the difference between an approach and a catcall is merely distance, which seems kind of arbitrary to me. You also bring up the intentions of the catcaller, which is an interesting point to touch upon. If you watch this vid you'll notice not only that the guy believes 100% that girls like being catcalled, but you "sometimes gotta call a girl". He also t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 09:23 PM
3

I think you might need to see a shrink dude, no joke. I'm worried about you here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 07:39 PM
1

TRPers are in different stages I find, they often tend to hold slightly different personal beliefs. The ones I would say all (should) hold in common can be easily found in the sidebar of TRP, but I will provide what I think are the basics here: Conventional dating advice (jus b urself, jus b confident, girls like nice guys) is trash Men and women are inherently different especially with regards to the SMP Women are not the supreme beings society makes them out to be, and are by nature hypergamou…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 07:31 PM
2

...Yes, but how would you differentiate the two? What would make you say "That dude just approached me", as opposed to "That dude just catcalled me"?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 07:16 PM
2

Sure, so what if a man were to shout "you have nice tits, can i get your number and ill take you for a drink sometime" from a large distance, that would be a catcall I assume?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 06:40 PM
2

At what point does approaching a girl become catcalling then?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 03:40 PM
-1

"le history says ur wrong XD" that's the best justification you have for this degeneracy? pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 12:53 AM
2

Because if you notice in the definition above it states:"between two people". How you can think this somehow applies to more than two is beyond me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:28 AM
2

Ok then, say we have three people who all fuck each other, at what point do they go from being fuckbuddies to being in a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:07 AM
2

So now you wanna play a game of definitions to try and justify your depravity? Ok, this is the dictionary definition of a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 10:41 PM
2

Sure you can, but that's not a relationship, neither is it marriage (just a degraded bastardization of it) hence why anyone involved is delusional. I also guarantee whatever children are put through this dynamic will suffer because of it. Do you really want me to start listing out every monogamous person who has murdered someone? Well done completely missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:11 PM
1

18 20ish 30ish 40ish 50ish
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 05:47 PM
1

Major decline between 40 and 50, what happened there.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 05:37 PM
3

Except the whole point of a relationship is to commit and compromise to one person, marriage was intended to be a joint agreement from one man to one woman to stay together in order to have children. Polygamous people want to have their cake and eat it too, they want to fuck around and still have a warm bed to come back to when they come home. The whole thing is a farce and they are deluding themselves. Since you seem to think three people you know somehow legitimizes polygamy, there were three …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 05:28 PM
1

Sure, but I imagine being stuck in your 50s spinning plates wouldn't be a very fulfilling life, so ultimately having a family at some point would be the right thing to do. As for your kids, they seem from what you've said to be doing alright dude, I wouldn't worry too much about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 05:14 PM
3

What exactly are you trying to argue here? you're actually going with the conclusion that polyamory is a legitimate marriage/relationship and not just degenerates being degenerates? And you're basing this all off some made up friends of yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 05:03 PM
1

I quote from the second link you posted: You can't "steal" a girl, as ballsy as it sounds. She makes her mind up to go with the higher value man. All you can do is present a better option. Isn't this the complete opposite of what OP was arguing against?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 04:53 PM
2

Both my boys have no concept of the "pedestal", so at least they'll be less likely to be taken "to the cleaners" down the road. Of course, that doesn't mean they'll have much to choose from in terms of wife/mother material My point exactly, whilst our kids may have some benefits we didn't, it's clear the SMP they will have to participate in will be much worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 04:47 PM
9

Well done, you repeated what I said in my post with added dramatization. Go you!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 03:03 AM
0

Overreacting by normal people standards or overreacting by BP standards? Normally yes, discovering your brother browses a subreddit with what would in your opinion be questionable content and then blowing your top because of this would be an overreaction, but this is TBP we are talking about. The entirety of there sub is devoted to hating TRP, so this is to be expected form them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 02:59 AM
7

Anything with more than two people is not a long term relationship, you are all fuckbuddies who are simply delusional. The thought that this type of thing could function as a family unit is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 02:39 AM
1

Isn't it true that in the US women have always overwhelmingly voted democrat? This seems to much of a coincidence to just be swept under the rug, so I am inclined to agree that hormones do affect political views. Is this really that groundbreaking however? everything from your mood to the growth of body hair to the amount of muscle on your body is based upon the hormones in your body right now, this is relatively small in comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 02:35 AM
1

Point taken, there does seem some variance in the red pill regarding this topic, but rather than your thoughts on this being dictated by what phase you are in, I believe it depends upon what your goals are really. If you want to live the life of a perpetual plate-spinner and just fuck everything you can till the day you die then you probably would love the sexual revolution and everything that is has wrought, and more power to you for it. On the other hand if your life has greater meaning beyond…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 02:26 AM
12

If this were true, then TRP shouldn't exist because comparatively, men in "the West" have it so easy compared to men worldwide. We have the ability to choose who we are with, and are free to have preferences in terms of how the relationship goes. Western white women are without a doubt the most privileged class of people in the entire world, it's not just that they "have it easy" compared to other people around the world, they are literally the most privileged beings on this entire earth and sti…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 01:52 AM
6

I'm not sure what definition of "truth" and "reason" you are using. If someone was to apply TRP concepts to his/her own life and garners great success from this (whereas what was done before led to disappointment) then there is nothing that can be unreasonable about the adoption of RP concepts, as that has proven itself to be the truthful, although uncomfortable, path. It seems you are specifically attacking the idea of AWALT, which I feel has been completely misrepresented by both BP and RP mem…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 01:05 AM
1

You're not taking any Ws for this either bro Saying dumb shit like this is certainly allowing me to "take Ws", it's like a huge neon sign advertising the fact you haven't turned 20 yet. OP was trying to say his studies disprove the idea in TRP of women wanting to "get a better deal" in relationships. I'm not exactly sure how this is a RP idea as I don't see it mentioned in the sidebar but even if it was, the OP specifically refers to cheating, it does not look at women leaving their boyfriends f…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 12:35 AM
1

Im not taking any Ws? Do you realize how stupid you look when you say this? And the point of the OP was that his studies somehow disprove some RP concepts, whilst they in fact give credence to them, saying "oh everyone knows that ablooabloo" is not an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 10:27 PM
2

Your not "jealous" because you don't want your girlfriend to fuck other men, the word is "normal".
/r/seduction31/01/16 02:59 AM
1

I wasn't saying that was a groundbreaking RP truth, just that it supports some ideas that TRP mentions, try and keep up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 11:22 PM
4

I think without realizing it you are giving credence to TRP ideas here. Especially about the likelihood of women cheating being based on relationship dissatisfaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 08:41 PM
1

Ok that's fair, the hip/waist ratio in the new barbie doesn't exactly seem realistic however, so in my opinion they've done this more to appease the SJW crowd rather than an attempt at realism.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 02:56 AM
1

1.John - complete dickhead 2.Abigale - creepy dumb whore, literally all of this is her fault, although showed tom what an ass john was so at least caused something positive 3.Sinbad - bit of a dick but he was in no way obligated to help anyone 4.Tom/Abigales mom(tie) - both did nothing wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 05:52 PM
0

Well the makers can change it for whatever reason they want, they own the rights after all. I was just questioning why realism should be important. Also keep in mind barbie is a literal cartoon character.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 05:43 PM
1

Why anyone cares about these dumb cunts is beyond me. Revenge porn and revenge gossip are both dick moves(neither of which should really be illegal). It should be obvious at this point feminists will praise literally anything a woman does against a man, so on that front this shouldn't be surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 05:39 PM
0

That's a good reason to change it Is it? Why should children's toys be 100% realistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 05:29 PM
11

Basically stating that apologizing does nothing but leave you in deeper shit than you started in, which is true really. An apology is nothing more than an admission of guilt, it does not make your mistakes disappear but rather removes all doubt that you should be hanged for them. You see this occur in SJW issues a lot; SJWs accuse someone of being sexist/racist/homophobic/etcetc, said person apologizes, and then instead of the issue being resolved the SJW army continues full force with rejuvenat…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 01:41 PM
-3

What the fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 01:26 PM
-1

Well the reason why they're so eager to change the original barbie is because they think she is too thin and encourages eating disorders. Now if we take this to be true then the current farm animal barbie will encourage obesity and overeating no? I also like how toys for boys can have six pack abs and be ripped beyond any human capacity and have a mean look on his face and guns coming out of every orifice, but as soon as there is a barbie that isn't a fatass: "omg think of the children".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 12:32 PM
2

Why do you guys have to make things so complicated? go for the tried and true: 'k'
/r/askTRP29/01/16 12:56 AM
1

Most FRs are without fail completely fake. Just TRPers trying to win alpha points from each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 06:24 PM
2

This is the thing though. Sluts wanna fuck around and then start a relationship and marry a good dude, so are constantly complaining when all they meet are "players", players/plate-spinners wanna fuck around and then start a relationship with a good woman, so constantly complain about sluts. Neither side realizes how they are contributing to their own misery. People want to have their cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 06:08 PM
5

The only way of having a real debate on this sub is to present scientific evidence and counter-evidence Why? Science is in fact fallible and there is nothing stopping you from cherry picking data to support whatever you want. Also if you are expecting anything resembling a real debate to happen here(or on reddit tbh) you are expecting too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 05:42 PM
1

Shouldn't they just accept that the opposite sex has the same right as they do to follow their biological imperative? Sure, but they will have to make a member of the opposite sex a wife/husband one day, which I can't imagine is too thrilling when discussing sluts/players.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 05:32 PM
5

Certain women might dress revealingly because they are insecure, some might not. It would be an oversimplification saying all women dressed revealingly are insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 05:29 PM
2

Agnostic I think would fit closest to what I believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 10:41 AM
1

It doesn't need to be a well reasoned argument since your beginning assertion was also not well reasoned, nor supported. "I know you are but what am I". If my OP was so badly-reasoned you shouldn't be having so much trouble forming an argument beyond "hurr durr we r boononobos dddddduuuuuuuuurrrrr"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 10:40 AM
2

I love this silly idea that concepts of good and evil are completely subjective. But to answer the question the two viewpoints you gave are not exclusive. Your children will have to grow up in the society that exists after your time has passed, so it is in your child's best interests that the society they will grow up and live in is kept in good steed. Hence it is in your genes' interest what is in society's interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 10:27 PM
2

Well, this is a red-pill dominated sub. So they're not wrong there. I don't see how that makes it not worth debating in though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 07:16 PM
18

I've read those books, they're not so much repugnant as they are really, really dumb. Just him being an autist ranting about his experiences as a sex tourist. They are also fake.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 06:56 PM
1

Turn the volume down dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 02:06 PM
1

You can't see how being closeted or watching too much porn is bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 08:47 AM
1

So? We are not bonobos believe it or not. It's hilarious you think this is a well-reasoned argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 08:45 AM
2

There is no need to be upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:32 PM
2

So at one point does something go from being arousing to an obsession? Probably at whatever arbitrary point suits your argument best right? So you're going to try to pretend you don't know what an obsession is now? Come on bro. I think you should look at your own sex life to see what I'd class as unhealthy, as your hostility towards me seems to indicate you're one of the such men my OP was addressing. PIV intercourse is probably a lot rarer in the LGBT community than the straight community for o…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 06:56 PM
2

So you are literally basing a "retort" around saying bonobos and humans are the same thing? You got me, can't find a flaw in this logic /s.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 06:41 PM
1

But it is still in cultures where islamic cultural norms are commonplace, all of the examples yo gave are of muslims.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 04:39 PM
1

The best course of action of the red pill with regards to the manosphere would be to steer clear of it. The manosphere does not attract losers, it is completely made up of losers. Just look at these dudes, Paul Elam? Roosh V? All the MGTOW bullshit? All of this is infectious and corrupts the red pill, and if you have any doubts of this, just check TRP at any given time, it's already occurring. What was a study of sexual strategy has turned into non-stop bitching about feminism and women, with a …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 04:35 PM
1

I honestly have no clue how people miss it. It's not just personal experience women liking handsome men is all over the media. I mean fucking come on dude this is common sense stuff. You're berating large groups of people off of the assumption something is self-evident, It's not. If it was basic common sense like you say there would be much less people feeling like they've been lied to. I said to improve yourself if you want to get laid. I don't know how you're getting that looks don't matter fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 04:25 PM
3

Looks really don't matter as much as personality, your bitterness, insecurity, self pity, entitlement and misogyny is really unattractive. Work on yourself" Finally you invest in personality. What do they say? "You thought looks didn't matter to women? You're such an oblivious entitled whiney socially retarded neckbeard! You just don't have a clue about women do you? LOL idiot, enjoy being a virgin" About sums up OP's rhetoric completely, good job.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 04:10 PM
6

"it's not of your business, don't judge, don't judge, it has nothing to do with you, people like what they like, it doesn't affect you." This is a silly SJW tactic used to shut down discussion, you should know better.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 04:07 PM
4

It seems you don't have much of an argument that goes beyond misrepresenting what I said, but whatever, I'll humor you. You made an appeal to nature. Anal and oral are not sexual acts people should find arousing because there is a designated natural way to have sex. I at no point stated people are wrong for finding said acts arousing, just that an obsession with said acts is wrong and highlights depravity. I'm not even going to go into what your saying about lgbt people which you may have some c…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 04:03 PM
2

Rape is also a frequent occurrence in the animal kingdom, should we do that too? Behavior of animals should never be used as a guideline for human behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 03:44 PM
8

I don't have a vagina dude, and go read my first post again, I am not against oral/anal, just the obsession over it some guys seem to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 02:53 AM
16

Because the use of world-changing technological advancements like the airplane and modern medicine is equivalent to being obsessed with fucking your girlfriend up the arse. I've heard silly false equivalencies before but come on dude, you can do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 02:50 AM
3

Apologies, I thought you made a nice post and meant to add a paragraph actually addressing it on the end but ended up going full autist and getting sidetracked. Essentially I believe similar to you, it is rather unfair to expect to receive oral but refuse to give it, I believe this goes both ways, for men and women. Honestly you shouldn't be surprised by bloops taking the stance you are arguing against, they come from a mindset that a woman is constantly perfectly reasonable and cannot be wrong,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 02:45 AM
1

I don't know, talk to people? Watch TV? Listen to music? Women liking handsome men is pretty hard to miss. Again, TO YOU. All men on earth are not created equal and did not have the same experiences as you believe it or not. What was self-evident to you is not self-evident to the next man and he should not be reprimanded because of it. I'm still in the dark as to how these guys were misguided and by whom. They were told sometimes useless other times counter-productive advice by people like you w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 02:32 AM
17

I don't understand any of this obsession with oral/anal sex honestly, there is a hole nature designed explicitly for your cock yet you want to shove it in two other holes used for completely different reasons. I can't help but think guys fixated on these things either are somewhat closeted or watch way too much porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 02:06 AM
2

Examples given seem to be less examples of rampant misogyny and more examples of rampant Islam, which is unquestionably worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 01:56 AM
3

I've heard of it, but not only has it not been given to me firsthand, I haven't ever seen it be given. Great so you agree this useless advice that steers men in the wrong direction of mediocrity is in fact given to people. Even if it somehow wasn't there's always tonnes more BS dating advice fed to men to take it's place, inter-change with it what you like. No one was misled, they missed the boat. It's not anyone else's fault that they didn't get what was obvious to everyone else. Shitposting on…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 01:41 AM
3

I honestly can't say I've heard that firsthand in real life. I have heard and seen women being very into physically attractive guys all the time though. You're saying you hadn't? Stop trying to obfuscate things, it's clear you've heard of said advice. Whether it has been given to you first hand is of no consequence. You're not a victim because you somehow missed the boat on the fact that women have physical preferences, and it doesn't give you an excuse to take it out on other people. So now you…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 01:08 AM
4

Dude, if you google "mens dating advice" LITERALLY the first thing that pops up is mensfitness.com. Get outta here Whatever's on the first page of google is mainstream dating advice now? You should probably read examples before giving them btw, as that one you mentioned is completely unrelated to what you're trying to prove. Are you really going to pretend you haven't heard the infamous "jus b urself" and the other assorted BS? No one is intentionally misguiding socially awkward kids, they just …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:21 AM
4

Mainstream dating advice also says to go and hit the gym and wear fashionable clothes. It's not hard to put two and two together. This is a straight up lie. Literally no one has ever said this, and honestly, improving your bench press and wearing well-fitting on trend clothes will not fix a fucked face. The problem isn't that socially awkward kids aren't picking up on this, it's that they're blaming other people. If you have to have an "anger phase" over women having the same sexual preferences …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 11:35 PM
8

Who is telling guys that appearances don't matter? Most mainstream dating advice is full of shit like "to get a girl to like you make her laugh", "just be confident", "jus b urself". It's pretty easy to see how someone could think looks don't matter. Unattractive men also like to try to believe this as a coping strategy when deep down they know it's not true You have no one to blame but yourself and your own social ineptitude for not picking this up by like 13. Cuz fuck socially awkward kids am …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 11:03 PM
1

One of the many faults of TRP is it's claim of being a study of sexual strategy, whilst it constantly oversimplifies things to a black and white alpha/beta dichotomy. There's this prevailing notion that any problem with relationships is down to "ur jus not alpha enuff bro". Such reductionist thinking is absurd. How can you claim someones past experiences have no bearing on their present decisions?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 10:54 PM
2

You can't have it both ways, either past experiences influence things or they don't, regardless of whether they were positive or negative.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 10:00 PM
1

SO SICK OF THE HOBOOOOOOOOOOOOS
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:29 PM
3

My argument is that if she won't do kinky stuff with you, then she views you as beta regardless of what she did in the past. What she did with her past boyfriend has nothing to do with it. Oh no, new guy also wants anal. She says no, but it's not because her past boyfriend was so alpha, on the contrary, it was his beta-ness that ruined the experience for her. Aren't you contradicting yourself here?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:25 PM
3

People in general will let you down more often then not. Not being able to accept this and make allowances for it shows insecurity and immaturity. I would generally stay away from someone like this, man or woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:20 PM
5

I think the use of "evil" in that thread was more bad wording/OP being dramatic than anyone actually thinking a captain and first mate relationship is immoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 07:14 PM
11

This model validates man's insecurities by giving him decision power and demands the woman doesn't question decisions and abide by them (congratulating the man when it goes well, shutting up when it goes wrong). I have no idea where this is coming from, as a man if anything goes wrong in your relationship you are to blame by default, whether you make the decisions or not. It only seems fair to me that men make the decisions when they will be the one catching shit if it goes wrong. It gives men w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 02:37 PM
0

Why is it disapproved of? I think this sub would be a lot better if there were more BP members (assuming circle-jerking was kept down of course)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 04:24 PM
2

Would you suggest progress is being made?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 03:54 PM
7

Absolutely no progress has been made whatsoever. TRP flings shit at TBP, TBP flings shit at TRP. So it goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 03:06 PM
1

Doesn't blue pill tell there members explicitly not to come here though? This place is becoming a red pill echo chamber.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 02:49 PM
3

Well most people who hold a certain perspective on an issue do so because they believe it is the right perspective on that issue, otherwise they wouldn't hold those views. Hence it's rather difficult to see the purpose of this distinction you're making.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 08:26 PM
4

people often make a claim, but that claim is about something that can never be proven in a statistically significant way, in any direction. You say that as if it matters. You can show people all the statistics you want, on basically any topic, and most will still brush it all under the rug if it doesn't fit their preconceived notions of what should be right. At any rate what would you suggest we do? Would you have people stop talking on topics where pointless stats can't be thrown around?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 07:47 PM
1

Well, there are many answers depending upon what philosophy you follow. Stoicism which ties in closely to trp believes living a rational life in agreement with nature without passions and undue suffering is the purpose of life. If you look at things this way then the only thing to do in your position would be to go for your pre med course.
/r/askTRP21/01/16 10:31 AM
3

You see this a lot, and it's always the same story. Guys trying to sell you their version of the same old bullshit always have to include how other pickup techniques don't work. Cue story how "I was 23 and had only kissed 2 girls!!!!" and how they found the pickup community, which 9/10 times involves reading either The Game or Mystery Method. Then comes the standard "What I learned worked for a while buuuuuuuuut..." and then they state how they only found true success with their method which the…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 06:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter