TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Khorib Archive

View 0 posts and 268 comments by Khorib on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Like all sports, they should be paid their market worth. Whether thats higher or lower.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:12 AM
1

That's shit, I see no issue at all with women's leagues. If we followed your standard there wouldn't be weight classes in boxing, wrestling, aand every other 1v1 contact sports.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 09:15 PM
26

Hell, I voted for Hilary (not that it matters in my State)... but looking back on this entire election season, I can see why Trump won. The DNC and diehard democrats alienated the centrists and grieving Bernie supporters... and they absolutely needed those votes. Instead, they were called sexist for being disappointed that'd they had to vote Hilary if they opposed Trump. So what happened? They voted for Trump out of spite or didn't vote at all. The DNC really dropped the ball this election.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 07:31 PM
1

As a circumcised American, even I was confused about the lube thing in the movies, but then again my circumcision isn't especially tight which is, from my understanding, where the lube comes into play.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:13 PM
1

When are they going to ban To Kill a Mocking Bird? False rape accusation is the entire premise of that book, and nearly every High School in the USA reads it.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 06:49 PM
1

Both 3rd and 4th deal with social issues, basically things that the law doesnt cover. I think the perceived diffetence between 3rd and 4th wave is the internet becoming commonplace and the rise of internet feminists.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 05:15 PM
1

For the sake of arguement, what do you do when your bully is stronger than you and laughs at tour attempts to fight back?
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:46 PM
3

Normalization? It has been normal for thousands of years, I'm pretty sure money/power was the primary reason people married before the renaissance... and people still did it after that. Gold digging is actually becoming more detestible now than it ever was. Its divorce that is relatively new.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 03:03 PM
1

Likely, yes.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 04:37 PM
1

When it comes to pregnacy, the nature of the situation is already asymmetrical. I dont personally believe it is fair to stick to the philosophy of "every man for himself" in this specific situation. But I also dont believe we should live that way as a society either, as I'm fairly pro-socialism. So, again, I think we will simply have to be content that we disagree with each other on a level.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 04:01 PM
0

Im a dude, dude. And mostly against modern feminism, and largely for more men's activism. We dont have to agree on everything, and this happens to be one of those things I guess we just wont agree on. You should be a little nicer though.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 03:41 PM
0

Its not an attack on your character, I said your tone makes you "sound" like an ass, not that you are one. It was a suggestion to adjust your tone, no need to get all autistic over it.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:41 PM
3

Im not calling you names or attacking your character, merely making an observation in hopes you will take it into consideration in future posts. Certainly it is her body and her rights, but I would hope that if I were to get unexpectedly pregant after taking reasonable precautions that my partner in getting me pregant would pitch in since we were equally responsible. If not, then abortion and all birthcontrol, including condoms, should be covered under insurance. Either way is OK with me.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:11 PM
2

Having a child should be the choice of both, hence the reason a guy should have the choice to opt out. If you both say yes, then you both have responsibility to the child (obviously). If you both say no, then it hardly seems fair that she has to both go through with the abortion and pay it in full. No offense, but you sound like a bit of an ass just going by the tone of your posts.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 01:53 PM
1

Takes two to tango, but suppose we'll just have to say we disagree.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 01:19 PM
2

Also wouldnt mind if the guy had to pay a portion of the fee for an abortion if both parties answer "no". As much room as there is for a guy to get shafter over a pregnancy, abortion isn't exactly a cakewalk for her. If the goal is to be as fair as possible, anyway.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:09 PM
11

I may need to get glasses, jesus. I dont know how I misread that. Sorry buddy.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 07:51 PM
10

Yup, I totally agree with George Carlin... But then he wasnt telling these type of jokes at rape survivor meetings either because he also understands tact.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 07:36 PM
-3

Thirsty? Im only vaguely familiar with modern slang, you mean amorous/lustful/horny? Or do you mean she was actually looking for a drink?
/r/MensRights02/06/16 07:34 PM
3

I think you are missing the point of our conversation. We were saying that since we've become recent fathers, even fictional child death and suffering has become very hard to watch. It wouldnt have bothered me much prior, but now it nearly brings me to tears.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 07:09 PM
2

We're talking about a newborn being eaten alive by dogs. Nothing else in this show has shaken me so much as this.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 06:42 PM
2

New father of a 6 month old here. Could barely watch that scene, almost cried. God damn...
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:54 PM
2

Its higher than 8% though. That figure is for reported incidents that were very likely false (like the perpetrator wasnt even in contact with the victim during the "rape"). This doesnt take into account the allegations that cant be proven one way or another, so there is no telling how many of those are true or false. It also foesn't take into account situation like with James Dean (whether true or false) where it not actually be reported, but made public none the less.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 08:32 PM
2

It reads like it was written by someone that wants to fondle and suck their child's penis.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 06:46 PM
-2

On the flipside of this, watching an infant all day is anything but easy. Anyone who says infants just sleep all day either dont have kids, or have very limited exposure. My wife couldnt wait to get back to work and put our kid in daycare, even though we hate the thoguht of someone else raising our kid for 40 hours a week, but going to work was just so much less work. And I can vouch for this, because the days I've stayed home with him have been brutal. Zero breaks and nonstop attention. I love …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:20 PM
5

You say that like uts a bad thing. Deciding voters are the ones that tend to flip flop. You will never be a "deciding vote" if you are consistent.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:46 PM
3

The baby was asleep during the incident, so no real harm was done... /s
/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:34 PM
1

Or better yet, add some new higher tax brackets rather than letting it cap at $200,000. Like for $600,000 and $1,000,000+ earners. Honestly, I think having a top tax bracket be as low as $200,000 was deliberate to prevent higher taxes on the very very wealthy.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 07:26 AM
3

She is currently a bit of a Mary Sue, though I'm betting that will change in later movies when she has a good opportunity to be conflicted.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:45 PM
2

Exactly. This is more an issue of supply and demand than anything else. Its incredibly easy and fairly common to donate sperm, so instead of letting everyone do it they just select the healthiest genes. There isnt any major demand for soerm on the market. There is, however, an enormous demand for eggs.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:06 PM
2

Ideally, it would be better if and average single person could support a family with a single job while also have decent job security. Sending your kid off to daycare is expensive as hell, and is also 8 hours a day your family doesnt get to spend with their child. Daycare isnt the best option even by a stretch. It's an option taken out of desperation.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 06:17 PM
14

Privilege isnt even the right word to use. A privilege implies having access to something you wouldn't normally have access to, you might say gifted. The elites and very wealthy live a privileged life, for example, because the vast majority of people arent capable of living a life anywhere close to that, nor should it be expected. If general white men's lives are the standard, then its impossible to call it privilege. You can say others are disadvantaged, but privilege has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:47 PM
1

Oh I hear you. She wasnt wrong for being there (hey, its her beliefs), but I wouldnt have agreed to an interview if I knew I wasn't particularly knowledgeable on the subject, just to avoid embarressing myself.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 08:49 PM
1

To be honest, even though its on the front page right now (I see examples almost daily in this sub alone), if I was asked on the street to give an example of when a woman got away with rape with only a slap on the wrist, I wouldnt be able to give any names or cases. Maybe I just have a particular shit memory when it comes to absorbing that kind of information, but I doubt I'm alone. I'm not saying she's right, but I wouldnt take it as a straight "gotcha!" if detailed information doesnt come to m…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:47 PM
1

Yea, for a lot of kids, if you tell them to strike preemptively, you are just teaching them to start a physical fight. While some physical altercations cant be avoided, many can be avoided if you know how to use your words and pick your battles.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:40 PM
1

And to elaborate on this, retaliation is not self defense. Legal self defense means to stop someone from hurting you using the minimum force nessesary. Retaliation, meaning you harm someone because they harmed you, is revenge and is not supported by the law and is not considered self defense. Basically, you can start throwing punches if you can prove it was the only way to make them stop throwing punches at you and they wouldn't let you escape otherwise. The law protects your body, not your prid…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:31 PM
1

You hope they either fucked up somewhere, or are feeling so guilty they admit it.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 06:32 AM
0

Im not saying we should destroy mens lives by going along with public accusations. I'm just saying I understand the plight of personal testimony not being enough evidense when that is the only evidense there is to give. In retrospect, her best option would have been to simply file a report so that its noted on record. Going for a conviction would just lead to the most common defense of "slut or nut", and no one wants to have to deal with that in High School of all places. Also, as I had said, be…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:48 PM
-1

Thats only a single case out of multiple accusations.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:18 PM
-1

I know what your point was, I was just pointing out the error in saying that it's not evidence to hopefully prevent further misuse. Otherwise I'm not disagreeing.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 07:18 PM
3

While, for many issues, awareness is a good thing, dont confuse it with benevolence. There is a lot of money to be made on any divisive issues that draws in both supporters and opponents.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:35 PM
2

So if you are trying to prevent accusations "months and years" later, why would you set the window for 24 hours? Why not 1 month? Or 3 weeks?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:28 PM
4

My wife was assaulted in high school and didnt go to the police. I can completely understand why because it wasn't violent, it was coersive and she was too busy blaming herself for putting herself in the situation in the first place. Not to mention she knew that all he had to say was "Nah, we just had sex" and then not only would nothing be accomplished, but it was be public information now, and people start taking sides with public information. So, in the end, she just kept her mouth shut about…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:15 PM
1

24 hours is a rediculously small window to report. What is this 24 hour window suppose to be preventing anyway?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:09 PM
3

Personal testimony does count as evidence in the court of law. However, it (usually) isn't enough to move "beyond reasonable doubt" by itself.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:05 PM
3

Even if charges are pressed, we still may never know.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:00 PM
1

Not in a place where a surgically modified genitalia is commonplace. "Normal" doesnt mean good/bad/natural. Normal just means commonplace. Dont attach ethics to the word. Preferring a natural penis could be considered a fetish depending on what is normal in your society.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:30 AM
3

Im not sure what your point is. You seem to think my conversation is about teachers or that they "should" get paid as much as engineers. Then you missed my point.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 10:45 PM
1

Slavery can be a societal norm, but normal doesnt mean "morally right" or "ethical". Not at all.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:36 PM
2

Sure, but that doesnt hurt my point. One society can find another completely odd, but within that society its normal. Fetishes have to do with sexual gratification being linked to something to an abnormal degree. Which society you are in can certainly change what is considered abnormal.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 06:42 PM
1

It's not nessesarily a fetish if its the norm in society for an extended period of time and mostly what you are used to. A fetish implies an abnormal desire or obsession (often sexual). Not defending him, I just dont think fetish is the right word for anyone with a preference for cut dicks.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:05 PM
13

It's shit, but I mostly agree. Rape is really hard to prove when its not violent and I respect people's decisions to not fight a court battle they know will go nowhere. But taking accusations to a public space to wage a public war (and skipping due process entirely) is too ripe for abuse. I say this with full sympathy for those that have been attacked and have no recourse, and I totally understand why someone might want to take to facebook or twitter just to feel like you were able to do somethi…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:54 PM
3

I dont like saying "work harder" as it implies that working women are slacking off by going for lower paying fields. As an anecdote, my wife works as a High School English teacher and works extremely hard at her job. Is it a job that requires a high intelligence, no it's not... But she works as hard, or even harder, and is more dedicated to her work than most engineers that I know. Most people couldnt deal with the work load she is given every day. Do I think she should earn more, sure, but I do…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:40 PM
4

I think anyone who is doing something positive should be given sincere thanks. Does it matter if it's behaviour we should expect? Positive reinforcment is a strong tool and does tend to work better than negative reinforcement. I think it's more telling that, when we get a compliment, we go right to assuming it must mean they think we've done something above and beyond our call of duty. I think adults in general need more praise in their life.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:36 PM
2

Side note, while it may well be State to State, my wife is a public school teacher and we just had our first kid (a son), and she doesnt get paid maternity leave either. She gets unpaid leave with the option to use her paid vaction time instead, just like I do. I suppose the upside would be in the case of having a lot of banked vacation, but in a job where you arent typically allowed to use those vacation hours in giant blocks.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 03:36 PM
1

This one person is saying it. Thats it.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 10:36 PM
2

I dont think Feminism is actually involved in this. The article talks about how the spooning article was rightly attacked by the masses, and the entire point was to be clickbait.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:54 PM
1

Same goes with older men trying to have children in their later years.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 05:47 PM
0

Some people think that if the they arent actually hurt by the physical violence, then they can shrug it off. They often forget that even if it doesnt "hurt" physically, the damage can add up mentally.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 05:03 PM
3

To be honest, I'm not exactly sure what happened in Rotherham England either.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:34 AM
5

Besides bruising, that only proves you had sex. And even bruising, depending on where and the severity, can be explained as rough sex. And then injuries can be avoided entirely through coercion (threatening that you'll beat them or kill them if they dont comply with sex), then there is no sign of struggle at all. Rape is actually really hard to prove legally aside from the most obvious cases.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 05:37 PM
3

I dont follow what you are implying. Explain?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:24 PM
2

Women geniuses are more rare than men geniuses, but they are both still rare. And men make up for their "lead" by having more idiots. At the end of the day, men and women's average intelligence are equal. Anyone that says women are smarter or men are smarter doesnt know what they are talking about.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:40 PM
2

Then you should say above 140, not 100. I also have a hard time beliving less than 11 women have had IQs above 140. Im not sure where you got that information.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:23 PM
2

I sense your sarcasm, but they dont grossly outnumber them. Apparently, the average intelligence of men and women are the same. Men make up the majority of the extremes (both genius and idiot), and women are more prevelent towards the upper and lower middle. Men's numbers are more diverse and women's numbers tend to be more reliable.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 05:06 PM
3

Besides the bit about "corruption", that was actually a very non-inflammatory explanation of the differences between the groups. I wish there were more of you in here, seriously. Edit - Inflammatory was the wrong word to use and doesn't describe what I was trying to say.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 05:42 PM
0

Colleges are money machines. A single rape publicly reported on campus will see a big dip in the number of applicants the following year. Thry would rather keep it private information so the money doesnt stop flowing.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:19 PM
6

Every dot on there is above the national average in IQ. Secondly, being incredibly smart doesnt actually make you a better educator, knowing how to teach and manage a class does. You could have someone on Steven Hawkings level of intelligence teach your High School English class and end up imparting next to none of that vast knowledge because the kids wouldnt listen. You dont need to be really smart to teach grade school, you need the skill to be able to convince the kids that its worth their ti…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:14 PM
2

I honestly dont think she has any conviction in anything she says. I'm convinced her entire goal is nothing more than to make money off feminists and their sympathizers by fanning the flames of the gender debate.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:04 PM
3

People at the "top" are older, which means they are simply the product of 30+ years ago. You give it 20 more years and I'm betting there will be far more women at the top (possibly more than men), not because of whats being done today, but of what was done 15 years ago. Those women from 15 years ago have been moving up the ladder ever since, and it simply just takes that kind of time to get to the "top". Point is, you can't use "who is at the top today" as a measure of today's progress. "Who is …
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:44 PM
0

It doesnt matter what the age of consent in Spain is. What matters is what the age of consent in the State this happened. Statutory exists to protect those that are under the legal age of consent. Their feelings on the matter have nothing to do with it, the law is pretty clear. Now if you have an issue with the law, we can talk about that... But that is a separate issue.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:30 PM
0

You dont have to feel violated for statutory rape to apply. The point is that you're too young to consent to sex with an adult. Couple that with these veing teachers whose sole purpose to to protect these students, and you have a massive violation on your hands with a massive difference of power. Losing their jobs and license to teach anywhere ever again should be a minimum. I am not against jail time though. This is awfully similar to prison guards having sex with inmates.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:25 PM
4

Men have had to "check in with their wives" for hundreds upon hundreds of years.... This isnt a new development. Yes, people would make fun of it, but it was absolutely ordinary. Women ruled the home, this is nothing new.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:55 PM
2

Not at all, man. Our hearts are shittier and we always take the more dangerous work. Men take the dangerous work because we're expendable. You dont need to convince me of that, Im well aware. Though it made more sense up until about 70 years ago. But biological imperatives dont change on a whim. Culture evolves faster than we do.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:27 AM
2

Thats fine. So we have similar jobs. So why does she deserve less play money again if our jobs are so similar?
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:20 AM
2

No, its better, but its not bad either. My company matches for my 401k (hers doesnt), she does get a pension instead assuming she continues teaching until she retires. Over spring and winter break she is grading roughly 120 essays plus any other projects she's catching up on. Over the summer she attends mandatory seminars and is creating lesson plans for the following year.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:09 AM
2

I make about 90% more than her. My job security is great, stock options, etc... Her healthcare is better, but thats about it.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:52 PM
3

I do IT network support for a living. My wife is a highschool teacher. I get payed more, work less hard, had less schooling, and work fewer hours than she does. By the logic in this thread, she deserves less play money from our family account for no other reason than her job chooses to pay her less. Rediculous.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:18 PM
3

There are lots of low paying jobs that are extremely hard (but easy to be accepted for), and very high paying jobs that are easy as hell (but hard to get in to). Trying to pretend its a perfectly fair system and that hard working jobs are rewarded with well compensated pay is a pipe dream.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:09 PM
2

Not nessesarily. High demand comes from how many people there are to do a job, and how badly the people paying need it done.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 10:36 PM
-1

Why does he earn more money? Because he undergoes more stress, and paid his dues in education/career development. Yea, not true at all. Higher pay comes with high demand, not how hard the work is.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 10:11 PM
2

Just setup up personal allowances (like a couple hundred a month) and make them equal, everything else goes to bills and savings. Personal allowances can be spent on whatever you want without need of consulting your partner (things like eating out, buying clothes, gadgets, etc). If you need to dip into your overflow account, then you sit down and talk about it first. This is way easier than trying to break down hourly work and far less likely to create discontent. As long as they are holding up …
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:40 PM
4

Best way to do it is to set up allowances for both yourself and your partner in your respective personal accounts. The rest of the money goes towards bills and savings. Make the allowances equal if you dont want to rock the boat. If anyone wants to make a larger purchase than their accumulated allowance can afford, then you sit down and talk about like adults before you dip into your overflow account. In my opinion, just because a partner earns less money doesnt mean they deserve less play money…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:27 PM
1

Fashion makes more sense near a city since you dont have to worry about expensive, but frail, clothing getting ruined by the environment. We tend to wear more practical clothing out in rural areas that doesnt look as pretty, but is sturdier. And Im not talking about farmers, I mean just getting your clothes snagged on a twig or dirty from the dust and mud on the roads.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:59 PM
1

Curious, where do you live? Farm, city, town, east/west coast, metropolitan, suburban? Just a general idea, not looking for an address.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:15 PM
1

Fashion becomes far less important in your life when you're married with children, doubly so if you live in a rural area rather than a metropolitan area. You know, where you spend a lot of time outdoors with plants and dirt. Practicality takes precedence in places where you can easily tarnish your clothing. Now I agree with you on the extreme ends, ie. Looking unkempt, wearing clothes too big or too small, unwashed, etc... But dont try to throw general cargo shorts into that pile, you're being r…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:13 PM
4

Fashion changes too often and quickly for me to invest in it. Cargo shorts were "in" at a time, blue jeans constantly come and go... I just cant bring myself to care. Comfort is more important to me. As long as you wear something that fits you and is clean/not ratty, I wont judge you.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:57 PM
1

Im not saying men should do anything. Im saying that this is something men do and many have been successful in forming long term legal relationships. What about men who want to be a father? Everything you do in life is a gamble, I dont think anyone would deny that. But it seems like discounting the success no small number of men have had is a bit shortsighted in the overall picture being painted.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 08:22 PM
1

Yes... This goes right along with what I said though, pretty much exactly. 25% (1 in 4) is a huge portion of the population. For comparison, Black Americans only make up 13% of the USA population. My question still stands, where do they fit in this picture you've painted?
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:04 PM
1

What about the 20-30% of happily married couples? Its obviously not "most" people, but there is still a sizable group that is unaccounted for in your two options.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:45 PM
7

That whole speech seems like it was almost entirely cut and pasted from the TheRedPill. I have seen this exact phrasing used at least a half dozen times. It really wouldn't surprise me at all if Fair Wind was actually a guy just trying to propagate the mantra, and trying to lend it more credit by posing as a woman.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 06:11 PM
4

The funniest part of this is that I am 99% sure that the "white" hand is actually the hand of a japanese lady... So not even white.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 07:20 PM
7

Sounds like she had no idea how to find thr book you're looking for. There is no Men's Rights section, just as there is no section for many other subjects. It so happens that they did have a couple books on the subject that were appropriately placed in the Social Sciences section. You cant expect the workers to personally know every book, which is why she asked if there was a specific book title you were looking for so she could find it... And she did in another store and even told you her findi…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 02:57 PM
5

I both agree and disagree. I dont care if someone who happens to be a teacher and someone who happens to be a student sleep together (as long as the age of consent is respected)... But if its a case of the teacher and student of the same school, you run into the same issue with guards sleeping with inmates. The slope is far to slippery and the person in power weilds far too much of it to take the risk on whether its actually consentual or not. Far too many problems arrise from it.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:25 PM
3

I'm not a frequent visitor here but I wanted to offer a different perspective. There is apparently quite a bit of evidense that woman have handled the homes finaces since finances were a thing. Queens were in charge of the treasury, and wives decided how the money brought in was to be spent. I'm not sure how this aligns with Redpill philosphy, but it's a way that men and women have been doing it for thousands of years throughout many cultures. I'm personally for handling furnaces jointly as that…
/r/RedPillWomen11/06/15 02:40 PM
15

Not the best advice to take before a bike ride though.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:06 PM
2

Are you saying the elderly are generally productive?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:16 PM
2

The idea with public healthcare is that it's paid for via taxes... So no, it's not really free.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 06:28 PM
2

Yes and no. Techically, someone who smokes will cost less, on average, than someone who doesn't (since they don't live as long on average). Lung cancer and serious heart disease do their work pretty quick once (and if) it settles in... But living into your elder years with constant check ups, medicine, and normal degenerative illnesses actually ends up costing more by the time they die.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 06:25 PM
1

Yup, using Median means you could get this number like this. Women ($=millions): $1, $2, $15.9, $16.2, $16.4 Men ($=millions): $9.1, $9.2, $9.3, $9.4, $10.4, $50, $140, $210, $500 If we compare median stats, then women are making $15.9 million to men's $10.4 million! Even though the average (in my fictitious example) is Women: $10.3, Men: $105.3.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 06:09 PM
1

every single person on TRP agrees Agrees with what?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 08:55 PM
1

The title will make people want to read it though. Depending on it's content, that could be a good thing.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:08 PM
3

So a single person, and maybe her friends, tweeted a joke/sarcasm/actual feelings and it went viral and other feminists jumped on the band wagon because they just followed what they thought other feminists were doing. To be honest, I can't help but be reminded of the whole "MRAs furious over Mad Max!" propaganda that kinda made the same thing happen. Even though the thought wasn't actually started by any MRAs, it did make many of it's members jump right on that wagon intending to follow the lead…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:55 PM
6

I don't think it was rape, but people are frustrated because of the genders were reversed people would, wrongly, be trying to say it is. Like, a lot of people.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 03:46 PM
1

masculinity is in trouble and something or someone is at fault. We are all at fault in this case.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:59 AM
2

No, I get it. One is a self serving endeavour for an individual and one is trying to help men as a gender with the goal of protecting men from malicious laws. The MRM is obviously a good thing for TRP, but TRP does nothing for the MRM. You can follow both for yourself, but TRP has absolutely no place here, nor do it's philosophies. It's bothers me that it's tolerated even a little bit within this sub, but then again I'm not surprised either.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:15 PM
2

You could make the same arguement for the appendix, yet we (wisely) do not mandatorily or volunatarily remove it just to avoid possible future complications. We only remove it when there is an active problem with it.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 07:39 PM
1

I'll dispute one anecdotally, which isn't hard because she was making vast sweeping generalizations. My wife can't get off with small thrusting movements, and gets off on larger thrusting movements. Also, it seems most woman have a lot of trouble or even cannot climax from intercourse alone anyway (many many studies on that). Also my younger brother, who is uncircumcized, has difficulty reaching orgasm. I think different men are just different. A survey I had read said that woman say the prefer …
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:03 PM
2

They basically want TRP to absorb MRM. They say it themselves, they see the MRM as nothing be a recruitment center for those that are the most embittered to join their ranks. The strategy, it seems, is to teach men to simply stop caring about what women think of us and to just be "men", and the rest should sort itself out because women will naturally follow the strongest and most confident men, as is their nature... In my opinion, it's all a deceiving blend of narrow-sighted fact and fiction.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 05:13 PM
2

I thought the prime causes of the drop in testosterone, we think, is due to hormones in our milk/meat and our city water filtration being inefficient in removing the estrogen flushed into the water from the hormone-based birth control women have been using for a few decades now?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:41 PM
3

You forgot that she would put her fingers in her sister's vagina. There's a bit about her "finding" little rocks in her sister.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 12:05 AM
2

Unless he actually wants to have sex with her, and knowing the show, he probably will.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 11:58 PM
7

I can tell you like the sound of your own voice, but it's pretty clear you don't actually listen to yourself.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:48 PM
2

It more that they should remain separate. The Red Pill is a personal philosophy about bettering youself and personal gain, Men's Rights is movement about gender equality in the context of preventing men (all men) from being left behind. The Red Pill may benefit from Men's Rights, but Men's Rights gains nothing from The Red Pill. In fact, it can only serve to muddy the water and further confuse people about what Men's Rights is actually about... which is hard enough already,
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:58 PM
3

Guilty laughs. Its meant to create guilty laughs, which can be construed as a criticism depending on the context.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 06:30 PM
1

For myself, I adore stories involving a bunch of guys that has no major romantic subplot. This actually is a big selling point for this game for me. I want to see what kind of conversations they have without the romantic subtext or awkward flirting. I think this is a good thing.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 01:31 PM
3

It really does provoke antagonization, doesn't it? It actually really bothers me that it's so effective at insulating their echo-chamber.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:56 PM
9

Just an idiot who completely misunderstands concepts like freewill and consciousness.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:40 PM
2

The line is arbitrary apparently.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:34 PM
1

You realize the 5th definition is small scale, like within a house hold or between two people. When people say "The war on men", they mean the 7th definition... which is hyperbole and is misusing the word. But I'll humor you, what is the goal of this war?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:38 AM
1

I assume you are using the last definition? As in there is a war to eliminate men (cancer/poverty/terrorism)?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 10:54 PM
1

Good thing I said "woman" and not "female". :-P
/r/MensRights08/04/15 07:55 PM
1

Prejudice and war are not the same thing. You can stop with the hyperbole.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 07:54 PM
1

There are some studies here and there, but they don't get much attention obviously because, to many people, it furthers the divide between men and women. Likewise most men are better than most women at vectoring objects, meaning determining where an object in motion will be if it maintains it's course. Thing is, knowing this is only occasionally useful because people are different and have a lot of variances. It does no one any good to shoehorn certain sexes into certain tasks just because they …
/r/MensRights08/04/15 04:28 PM
4

I'm saying that a women only competition should be entirely separate to a coed competition. So if it's women only, only women would be paying for entry, thus the prize money would be proportionate. In coed, there would only be one set of winners with no gender divide. No special prize for the top women competitors. I'm not saying that's how It works, but that's how it should work.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 04:19 PM
0

You're going off the deep end. Try to get back on your feet, buddy.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:23 PM
7

I believe it's because there are so few women competing. If you give women their own league, it gives them a chance to play against their peers and also a chance to win, thus encouraging more to join... Which is a good thing. It would be great if more women played chess! I have no problem with this as long as the prize money is less than the coed competition. The prize should be greater for being the best of the best rather than the best of one gender. Men could start a men only league, but the …
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:13 PM
1

Most women can hear and understand more conversations going on at once than most men. That's an example of what they mean about women being able to multitask and, before anyone tries to get snarky, it's an incredibly useful skill to have. Not helpful in Chess though.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:07 PM
3

I'm a guy, and I'm fearful walking down the street alone at night. I'm not so concerned about being raped, sure... But I'm terrified of being shot or stabbed. How is feminism going to help me?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 07:35 PM
11

War sucks... a lot, for everyone. Mostly men, yes... But Justgirlythings is the equivalent of firstworldproblems, and men are just as involved with those too. Its just a silly comparison. It'd be like having a picture of a man changing a diaper and saying being a parent can be challenging, and then showing a picture of a screaming women gruesomly giving birth with a fourth degree perineum tear. They aren't compatible and would only serve to try to discount the fact that fatherhood can indeed be …
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:45 PM
3

There's so much wrong with your post I'm not even sure where to begin. I'm certainly not going to tackle it on my phone, so perhaps later when I have more time if no one else points it out before then.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:31 PM
5

To be clear I'm not arguing with anyone, but I don't think this is a new thing. Women have ruled the household for thousands of years. Most home decisions were made by the women. Not saying its right or wrong, but it's certainly not new.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:29 PM
1

Hey man, guys need to get on their handwriting game. Maybe special government assisted programs designed to help boys write legibly.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:16 AM
1

I understand your sentiment, but don't exaggerate. It makes you sound paranoid and crazy.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 11:51 PM
12

Her comments are out of line, but as the husband of a high school teacher, who occasionally will help with grading vocab quizzes and straightforward tests, boys do generally seem to have shittier handwriting. And not just less "flowery", I mean less legible. It still doesn't make it OK for a teacher to make a comment like this to a student.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:54 PM
3

Never comment on the way any of the children look... This includes compliments. Never touch any of the children. No shoulder or head pats... Nothing. There are seminars you'll have to attend that tell you what to do if a fight happens. Be the best damn teacher you can be! Treat everyone fairly! That's it.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:18 PM
29

"So you're saying women still make 0.77 on the dollar compared to men?" Is exactly what will be said in response to this.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:09 PM
2

Don't get pictures. Talk to the girl and ask for her cooperation if possible so they can review the actual test.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:59 PM
2

Wow, youre reaching. Why can't both genders simply be more inclined to grade children of their own gender higher because they are easier to empathize with? There's no need to try and justify the male side of this two-way sexism.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:15 PM
1

Starting at $37k for the amount of work required is not high. You talk about 9-5 jobs, but their expected work days are 6-5 minimum, plus weekends. Days off are just unpaid days of grading shitty essays. Source: I work with electrical/mechanical engineers and ComSci folks. My wife, who is a High School English teacher, works harder than most of them for about 1/4 of their pay. I barely get to see her at home because of how much grading and planning is required that isn't given time to be done du…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:08 PM
13

I mean, if there is no actual evidense then how can she? If he didn't get a drug test, then it's just her word against his at this point. Its sucks really bad, but if we could put people in prison at simply someone's word then how many more innocent people would end up in prison?
/r/MensRights19/02/15 01:03 AM
1

The point is that it's still eugenics. Eliminating people with "defects", whether real or perceived, from the gene pool to "improve the species" is what eugenics is all about.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:42 AM
2

The conspiracy side of it is the idea that it was creating specifically destroy that demographic.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:58 PM
1

Having an abortion because you found out the fetus has downs syndrome is also eugenics. The morals are debatable, but I still believe abortion should be legal and shouldn't be required to give a reason (up until a certain stage of development anyway).
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:18 PM
3

Conspiracies abound...
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:14 PM
8

The divisive comments regarding liberals vs conservatives, Dems vs Repubs in this sub is beginning to drive me away. Can we try to cut that shit out? Its not helping and it's going to start driving away your allies.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:12 PM
3

This was a bit disappointing because I actually like Gillian Anderson :-/
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:02 PM
1

If you could make a coherent argument then I might be able to actually respond to something, but you've given me nothing. If you want to argue or debate then do so. Stop babbling.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:20 PM
2

I agree. It not something I'd imagine a sane person doing, but I know people can do really stupid shit.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:49 AM
2

I guess I have a different (lower) expectation of people. I have personally known two people that have seriously injured someone with a pistol that they were fucking around with while thinking it was unloaded. It isn't farfetched for me to believe that a 17 year old was being stupid with a weapon they thought was unloaded and accidentally killing someone with it.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:30 AM
1

Ok, so we've successfully established that guns are even easier to accidentally hurt or kill people with than knives. So what is your point? Mine was saying if the killing was an accident, then Manslaughter is an appropriate charge. Considering the circumstances, and how apparently easy it is to mishandle a gun, it likely was an accident.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:31 AM
1

Besides requiring a license... how is that any different to holding a knife to someone and accidentally stabbing them? Pull your head out your ass. Whats with you people? You act like I'm saying she shouldn't get charged at all when I'm actually saying Manslaughter and 25 years in prison sounds right.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:11 AM
0

I'm really not sure where you are even going with this post. It's clear you are trying to disagree, but where your disagreements lie is... confusing and very unclear. Instead I'll leave you with this. If you are still in school, please pay attention in your English class. Proper grammar will go a long way in helping you convey your thoughts into intelligible sentences and arguments.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:05 AM
0

Seriously? MRA doesn't need or want people who ignore facts and call people they simply disagree with "feminists". The irony is why you would mimic the worst behavior of the group you are trying NOT to be a part of? Grow up.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 12:03 AM
0

Why do you want to act like pointing guns at people is a normal fine thing to do... So much hyperbole. I'd say you constructed a strawman, but I didn't even make an argument. Wipe the spittle and foam from your mouth and stop trying to spread unnecessary hate through this thread. The girl is looking at 25 years in prison when people who have deliberately committed murder have gotten less time. Is that not enough time for you? What else do you want, a public execution?
/r/MensRights28/01/15 11:43 PM
1

That's why you aren't a judge or a lawyer. Manslaughter means negligent or reckless behaviour leading to someone's accidental death. Its the same as brandishing a knife at someone in jest and then tripping into them. Its a stupid thing to do obviously, and even if it was an accident it was due to reckless behaviour. Hence the manslaughter charge.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:31 PM
2

If it was actually an accident, then manslaughter isn't leniency... it's accurate. And in Florida manslaughter with a gun gets you 25 years apparently. Why is it wrong to feel bad for her and everyone else in that situation?
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:23 PM
-1

The other factor is the low pay.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:31 AM
1

Depends on the State. And I see no reason to record the conversation if the teacher only has a magnet on her desk. Just talk to guidance, they'll check out the magnet and take it down. Recording the teacher without informing may just stir up more trouble for the student in the long run. It's not wise to do it unless she's trying to indoctrinate the class or something.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 04:46 AM
2

Don't try to disrupt the class. Either ask her about it privately and tell her that it upsets you, or take it to guidance office. If nothing is done after that then you escalate the issue to a higher power.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:17 PM
3

The worst teacher I ever had was a math teacher. The best and most nurturing were several of my English teachers. I don't think class subject choice has any real correlation to how much a teacher likes or dislikes men.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:13 PM
1

Being a Math teacher is easier than being a History or English teacher. I don't think you know what you're talking about. Edit - For those downvoting, I'll explain. To be a high school or middle school math teacher, the answers to every lesson are finite and for the most part either correct or incorrect. This means that they can very quickly grade all of their assignments. Lessons plans for tackling fairly simple mathematical formulas isn't very time consuming either and much of the time is laid…
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:09 PM
2

It's not English teachers... it's administrators and people on the Board of Ed trying to make a name for themselves. The English teachers hate Common Core as much as everyone else. Source: Married to an English teacher.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:07 PM
2

Complain that you feel like she is intentionally lowering your grades and raising the females grades above the males for less quality work. What the fuck is wrong with you?! Can you really not see how slimy lying about that shit is? A simple complaint about the magnet is more than enough to get it removed.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:02 PM
2

Semi-related. Teachers get payed the same regardless of gender. Their pay is completely determined by a step system that accounts for length of employment and education.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:43 PM
0

How about a 50 year old and an 18 year old?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:43 PM
1

It's 16 in my State. One State the age of consent is as low as 13. It's not all 18. Look it up.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:43 PM
1

It's still 14 in some States. 16 in more. 18 isn't the standard everywhere in the USA.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:42 PM
2

The punishment isn't always about the victim either. It's fine if the boy was ok with this. He did nothing wrong. However, the teacher absolutely did something wrong. They are State employees paid for by the tax payers to both teach and protect the well being of their students. Entering a romantic relationship with one is considered gross negligence and also damages the good faith of those who have placed their trust in the school system. It has nothing to do with the willingness of the child/te…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:33 PM
0

Sure, if you are ok with paying twice as much.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:29 PM
1

True, but we shouldn't let them determine who is short/average/tall. Correct people when they wrongfully call an average height man "short". We can change the world!
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:52 AM
2

Women don't own the world, man. They don't get to be the only ones that decide who is short/average/tall.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:49 PM
3

You don't need to apologize to me, I'm well aware of how the system works. However, my question is "Why?". We even do it to each other by saying 5'7, or even 5'9-5'10 is short (which is crazy because that is average height). Don't perpetuate it and maybe we can slowly change it.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:06 PM
1

Why is "short" roughly 2 inches under average height? Surely there should be an average bracket rather than either being "short" or "tall".
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:28 PM
1

Read what though? They were from Africa where there were no formal schools teaching how to read English. And learning to read doesn't suddenly encode itself into your genes. In fact, almost everyone can learn to read if given the opportunity. I don't feel your point really applies to the slaves.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:19 PM
1

We're talking about black slaves though. I don't think their wealth enters into it.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:21 AM
2

Well no shit. It means our culture evolved faster than our biology. Catching up is going to take some time. Of course we no longer need to "view" men this way, but there is way more too it than simply how men are viewed in society for the last 50 years. I mean, there are quite a few people still alive that lived during a time men were still considered very disposable.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:05 PM
5

I missed the sarcasm I hope was implied.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:32 PM
1

Being able to read is more about education than intelligence, I would think. I suppose the smartest and most curious could start teaching themselves through context clues though. I honestly don't know enough about it comment further.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:55 PM
1

I don't know if they specifically targeted intelligence, but I'm sure the more rebellious or mutinous slaves didn't survive very long.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:21 PM
93

It's almost as if men were genetically equipped to be disposable dice machines with hopes of having the best genetic roll whose good genes and better adaptability could be spread through the gene pool. But something like that would never affect men and women's psychology, of course. Psychologically, men and women are exactly the same, right?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:05 PM
0

Or egalitarian.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:44 AM
2

Ironically, calling a white person "racist" evokes a similar reaction to calling a black person a "nigger". Same can be said at calling men "sexist". It evokes a very visceral emotional reaction. It may not have the full history behind it that "nigger" does, but at the rate feminism is going, just give it time.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:42 PM
3

We are more a Republic than a Democracy. Most of the important votes arent cast by citizens, their cast by the representatives we voted in to vote for us. Now, if all women voted and did so unanimously they could elect pretty much anyone they wanted since they are the majority.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:14 AM
0

The reality is that they only need to contribute roughly 50% to be considered sharing economic power. I'd rather assume that than to take a chamce of wrongly over estimating.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:11 AM
1

There have apparently been similar apps for men, but some have been removed from the stores due to complaints. The company that makes this app boasts that they have a male version that has been released or will be released. We'll see how long it lasts, but regardless I think booths apps are disgusting slander machines. I can already imagine both being used to deliberately sabotage existing relationships. Like say you've been in a long term relationship, and then your SO or spouse takes a casual …
/r/MensRights06/02/14 05:39 PM
18

You don't get it. Sally uses the app and finds a bunch of nasty stuff about you. Then Sally tells all of the women that both you and her know... like at the office you both work at. So now the women who don't use the app are still hearing the slander.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 05:03 AM
1

I don't live anywhere near California.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:42 PM
3

What recent evidence? You mean the questions I've posted on the feminist subreddits that get downvoted into oblivion? Because no one that has Men's Rights in mind would ever talk to a feminist? You're an unwarranted asshole.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:51 AM
1

Looking it up, the plaintiff has to prove it was published to a third party for the "defamation per se" to apply... which it never was.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:48 AM
3

So what does that have to do with talking to a friend about it?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:18 AM
2

To take the bait against my better judgement, Im far more MRA than feminist. Dont be an asshole.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:51 AM
2

A quick read pointed out that to classify under libel law, it would have to be written. Spoken is slander. Interesting. Considering I've never written anything about it with mention of his name, it doesn't look like it really matters. Slander at best if he really wants to open that can of worms. It's not as if I've been screaming about it from the bell tower anyway.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:08 AM
2

Good to know, thank you.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:00 AM
3

No alcohol involved, and I never threatened him once. I simply confronted him. I suspect he thought she would just remain quiet about the whole thing and was shocked when I asked him about it in specific detail. I asked him if she wanted it and he said no. Then I asked him about his threats to her and he started crying. He was obviously very upset. A false confession doesn't make sense. Regardless, I don't think a confession from me is admissible evidence in court, or at least not valuable. I co…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 11:58 PM
4

So if I see someone steal shit, and I didn't record it for proof... I'm obligated to keep my mouth shut?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 11:52 PM
3

Of course there is a difference, but I was curious how it would pertain to the linked article. I could be making it all up for all the law knows.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 11:51 PM
4

How is that relevant to speaking my mind to my friends or family?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 11:09 PM
8

How? He raped someone and admitted it. That makes him 100% a rapist in my mind. When I speak my mind about him, I say he is a rapist. I'm not sure where you are distinguishing a difference.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 10:28 PM
3

I mean, I got the guy to admit it to my face after some words with him. He admitted, through his tears, that he knew she didn't want it and that he threatened her with violence to not tell anyone about it. I 100% know what happened but I'm just the jealous boyfriend of a slutty girlfriend to his defense attorney and jury if we ever pursued it. While I understand the issues with slander, I'd think talking to my friends or family about it would be a bit different than the mass slander libel laws a…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:37 PM
3

My fiance was raped through intimidation by a school friend in highschool and, due to both passed time and a lack of hard evidence it was decided to not press charges as it would just hurt everyone involved and likely no justice would be served. It would just be her word against his. Is it ok for me to tell someone in confidence "fuck that guy, he's a piece of shit and a rapist."? Obviously slandering him all over social nerworking sites is wrong, but should there be a law to stop me from speaki…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:15 PM
1

Celebrities aren't even real people to me, that why I don't really find any of them to be attractive. If you were to ask me if a single celebrity was pretty, I could give you an answer of "She is a very pretty girl, she probably looks great without makeup too." And then that will be the last I think about them. I don't understand people that drool over celebrities, most people are just attracted to the characters they play anyway.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 04:13 AM
2

I would say if it can be proven you've had no involvement or knowledge, then that shouldnt be allowed.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:49 PM
2

But mom may not want you in the kid's life at that point (after their born). I'd say your decision must be made while both parties can still make the decision. If put you kid up for adoption, you can't just come back and take your kid from their new parents, or demand any type of partial custody, etc... You've given that up. I say you're either in or out in the beginning. Toom uch power is put into a man's hands if he can just opt back in whenever.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:18 PM
1

Wow, I see worse problems arising from that. If she doesn't tell you, then you're just out of the picture entirely with no say. What if you wanted to have or see your kid?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 12:54 PM
3

This is how I see this playing out if we ever were able to pass laws. Men would have a legal document they could sign within the time the woman could still legally abort. So within 20 weeks of pregnancy in many places, but this could obviously vary from place to place. This way, the woman can still decide to abort of the father "opts out". If this happens, I see feminist articles and lawyers advising woman to simply not tell the fathers that they are pregnant until it is too late to abort, thus …
/r/MensRights22/11/13 12:06 AM
2

No, that was what you assumed before you even checked the comments on this page. You were just looking to validate yourself. Be honest.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 11:57 PM
1

Um.. ok. Where did it say that she was going to receive a less harsh punishment? I hope she is charged with something, perhaps 2nd murder. This isn't r/Rage. This is Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 05:08 PM
0

Where is the Men's Rights issue? Seems like a senility issue. It's not justification, but old people can do ridiculous things for really bizarre reasons, usually due to them not fully comprehending the situation.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 04:40 PM
2

Fair enough, then 17 years, 11 months, and 29 days. Makes the age difference a possible 3 year and a couple days. Most people wouldn't object to a relationship between those ages. I think my point still stands.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 09:21 PM
1

Troll or not, you probably don't belong here.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 09:06 PM
1

I think men obsess about penises more than woman do, to be honest.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 09:02 PM
1

Age doesn't matter in this case because he was past the line for consent laws. This is strictly a teacher to student issue. The kid could be 19 while she is 21 and consequences will be the same.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 08:56 PM
15

Turn out he may have been blindfolded.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 08:45 PM
2

I proposed to my fiance naked on the living room floor right after we got out of the shower after a long day at work. Told her that I love her just the way she is now: No make up, no clothes, no baubles, no glamour. Very simple and she was thrilled. Still bought an expensive damn ring that is, crazily, cheap by current standards. I have a feeling, however, that many woman would be insulted by this gesture because they feel wouldn't be able to "impress" their friends/family/strangers thanks to me…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:48 PM
1

It tells me that you haven't thought about it enough then. Until you can come up with a fair answer, men shouldn't have the ability to determine whether an abortion occurs or not. I know you said that "men should have a say", whatever that means, but men are obviously free to voice their opinions to their lover about her choices, he just cannot impose them.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:41 PM
2

Just curious, what should happen if she wants an abortion but the man does not?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 07:53 AM
3

They certainly used to when they couldn't get divorced, or there was social stigma for leaving. Now they can leave whenever they want, and they are starting to. In their 30s seems to be the age that this happens now.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 06:42 PM
-1

When it was written, people couldn't just get divorced whenever they wanted to. So I wouldn't say it's a blatant lie... more just a blatant misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 02:05 PM
4

Isn't the female strategy according to evolutionary biology to continually seek the better options? Settle with the alpha male while you raise your kids. But when he inevitably falls from alpha status, move to the male that has become an alpha? Isn't this also pointing to why 80% of divorces are initiated by woman? I use "alpha" loosely in terms of eligibility/power/wealth/fitness. Sorry, I didn't read the article... was that what it was referring to?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 02:03 PM
-3

"They" isnt proper for singular.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 08:21 PM
1

It's not about my reading comprehension. I read the aeticle. I was responding to another comment, not the article. You were asking me why men shouldnt be afraid, and I responded that I already addressed that I would be afraid as a man...
/r/MensRights29/10/13 08:20 PM
1

How?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 07:13 PM
1

To be honest, I'd be put on edge too. I'm a man and, like I said, I find people scary.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:54 PM
-3

English needs a singular 3rd person gender neutral pronoun. Right now, we only have "it", which many find objectifying.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:09 PM
1

Maybe whistle or start humming a song to yourself.... though that could be even creepier depending on the song... Like anything by Tiny Tim.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:58 PM
1

I know my fiance fears it. To be honest, I'd be put on edge too. People are scary, man.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:55 PM
4

Military loves it to. "Shut up and get in line Private!"
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:44 AM
2

Well then I put the embarrassment on them. If they expect me to pay when it was a mutual arrangement (or they they indicated they wanted to treat me), then I'll ask them where their money is? If they didn't have money, why did they go out? etc.. If they don't have money, then I will pay (I'm not going to leave them stranded with a bill) but I'll be warier the next time... assuming they want to go out again after that.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:07 PM
3

My rule of thumb is as follows. It's in the language. If I ask someone if I can "Take them out", then I feel responsible to pay. If I ask if they'd like to meet up for ___ somewhere", then I'm expecting them to pay their share. Likewise if someone were to ask if they could "take me somewhere" or "Treat me" for coffee, food, drinks, etc... I assume they mean to pay. Otherwise I assume it's going to be dutch.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 04:25 PM
2

Could sub it out with the derogatory "femmies". Not that the rest of the song isn't already a bit derogatory, but there ya go.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 02:05 PM
9

I think the idea isn't about proven false allegations, but more about past instances where rape could have occurred but there wasn't enough evidence to put the alleged rapist in jail. They don't want past failed cases to be used against the person. We know that just because the law deems someone to be "innocent" doesn't mean the crime wasn't committed. Obviously this may also end up protecting someone who "cries wolf", which is unfortunate. I think something that may help is for men who are fals…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 11:46 AM
2

I would argue that the fight between Men's Rights and Feminism is entirely about "an insidious set of ideas", and not specifically men and women themselves. Which ideas are considered "insidious" obviously depends on what side you are on. Personally, I'd say anything that hampers equality among the sexes is... well I wouldn't say insidious, but definitely counter-productive.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 09:34 PM
9

I don't think many of those involved with the MRA would be opposed to that either. So, more importantly, why do you think it hasn't happened?
/r/MensRights21/10/13 06:47 PM
12

One of the issues I have is the choice of names and titles for ideas feminism puts forth. Feminism (Specifically feminine/women) are the heroes that are fighting to save the world from the terrible Patriarchy (Specifically masculine/men). Similarly, with your request for MRM to join forces with Feminism because we're fighting the "same battles", why not join under a whole new flag that encompasses both sexes and dissolve both Feminism and MRM? Why does MRM have to be absorbed under Feminism? How…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 06:19 PM
2

Just because I disagree with your stance on abortion doesn't mean I'm a feminist. I feel that because it is the woman's body that the fetus must use to develop, it's solely her choice on whether or not she is to continue carrying it. Just because you blew you load inside her doesn't mean should be able to dictate whether or not she should carry the child to birth. At the same time, I don't believe that just because you blew your load inside her that you should automatically be bound to 18 years …
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:05 PM
1

Then he can carry the kid to delivery for the remaining 7 months while the pregnancy wreaks havoc on his body. Since this is currently an impossibility, he can/should only voice his opinion. Pregnancy isn't exactly easy and no one should be forced.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:10 PM
4

Guilting someone into having a child usually never turns out well. She may love the child regardless, but she'll likely (understandably) hate you.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:05 PM
4

I don't see why we should have control over a woman's bodily rights, it's hardly terrifying. If she doesn't want to have the child, no one should be able to stop her. What I do find terrifying is the ability to financially enslave me by getting pregnant, and there is no way for me to opt out or really have any say in the matter. Obviously I should never be able to make anyone have an abortion, but an accidental pregnancy could easily screw a guy over without any options left to him at all.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:03 PM
1

They are both in high school together and could have even shared a class. They are peers as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:09 AM
1

The law would also allow her minimum sentence to be zero days if the judges wants. However the judge could also through the book at her.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:07 AM
2

Many states allow a 4 year age gap.. counting days. I think it's quite reasonable and Florida should adopt it.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:01 AM
1

I hope we can just change the law and stop punishing anyone for this situation.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:58 AM
4

Oh please. This is in reference to "a woman is saying it, so it must be true."
/r/MensRights23/05/13 09:12 PM
2

Yup, men go to jail for this and apparently she will too. My opinion is that no one should be in jail for this situation. So now what is it you're yelling about?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 07:58 PM
10

Right? I was under the impression that the purpose of the MRM was to step up and fill the position that neo feminism decidely abandoned... Which is equality for all genders... Not to hate on women.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:15 PM
1

That's what premature ejaculation means, which is linked to circumcision. Would you like to see the studies? Uncircumcised folks suffer from the same issues. There are also studies that say circumcised are more likely to have trouble climaxing without rough stimulation... so which is it? Sounds like all bases for basic sexual dysfunction are covered and can just easily be blamed on the proceedure. But wait, if your not circumcised, then your problems are normal and just require practice to get t…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:38 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, circumcision in my analogy isn't about whether you were born with it or it was taken away before you were aware. I am also all about enhancing sexual enjoyment to the point where I am considering restoration now if it is actually effective and working for you. However, this are all aside from the point I was making. My brain was wired no differently at birth. It is the cones in my eyes that were lacking, and my brain adapted to the difference. My brain would then have to re-a…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 04:39 PM
1

There is one thing I want to point out with an analogy. This is not really an argument for or against circumcision, and definitely not an argument to have it removed and then reconstructed. Here it goes. Being red/green color blind as I am, the world seems perfectly normal to me through my eyes. You would expect this as it is all I've known. My brain has adapted to use what I see to the best of it's ability to function with the lessened sensitivity in detecting those colors. I haven't seen any i…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 03:55 PM
0

I do not have the energy to respond in full to your post, which I will apologize for. I feel my point was made and also understood, which I care more about than convincing you. For your peace of mind if you feel similarly, I do also understand your point. There is one thing, however, I would like you to elaborate on. You say you are in the process of foreskin restoration. Can you tell me more about this? How does this work? How long is the process? How extensive is the process? What does it look…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 03:01 PM
0

Is this the majority? No, but that doesn't matter either. I agree and disagree. The problem I have with it is that even though it's not the majority, it is portrayed that way. You then have a bunch of circumcised men that have zero sexual problems thinking that they might because they heard you lose all feeling. They respond with "Well, it feels pretty good to me", and they get "You don't know any better" in response. I don't feel it's very ethical to spread that kind of information, which I per…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:45 PM
0

Living in the United States, about 99% of the people I know are circumcised and I haven't heard of any of them having circumcision related sexual issues. In fact, the most common sexual issue I hear from them is climaxing too quickly because it feels too good. You aren't missing what you never had, and your body has adapted my making the other nerves in your dick more sensitive to compensate. All of which are arguable or outright wrong. I'm sorry, which ones are wrong? Among the few of them that…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:32 PM
0

My disagreement is regarding sexual fulfillment, not sensitivity.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:16 PM
0

I believe you, it was just written very dramtically with her citing herself being so ignorant its almost trollish. Cant blame me for being skeptical.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 07:28 PM
0

Much agreed
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:38 PM
16

Yea, Im not about to condemn her just to appease those that feel this is an example of unequal rights. If it were a boy in her situation, I'd be just as adamant about getting him his freedom.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:17 PM
0

Circumcised men spend their lives chasing a feeling they will never be able to experience fully, and in chasing this feeling, they are forced to have rougher sex. I... disagree with this. Assuming this account is real, the self-doubt that her son was experiencing was solely from the remorse of his non-cut friend. The same really goes for my self as someone who is circumcised. Reading the posts of the anti-circumcision movement encouraging people to be angry with their parents and to be mournful …
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:25 PM
-2

Besides a youtube page with no uploads, do we have pictures of this person? There is a Facebook group, but it's not hard to fake that either. I'm really curious if this is real or not, too.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:00 PM
2

13-14
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:32 PM
2

Unless your in certain parts of Africa, and then violent female rape skyrockets to something like 70% of women. This obviously isn't anywhere close to that in weather societies. Although the people in Africa are also dealing with a lot of other shot on top of that.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:25 PM
2

Definitely liberal on social issues. I like strong, but responsible government, and mega corporations scare the shit out of me. Definitely not a Libertarian, as I prefer if States had more uniformity to their laws. To clarify, my knowledge of Libertarians are limited to the only ones Ive met which seems to want nearly all laws to be determines by each individual State.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:24 PM
1

He did say LESS likely. The otherside though is that someone might act out more hostilely if he feels its for the best of his family. Its a double edge sword. Having something like family to lose can make you more agressive in differemt situations. Family is starving? Gonna go rob that bank to make sure they wont be hungry again. Its an extreme example, but not outlandish.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:34 PM
3

I think it has more to do with the idea that they are missing "something". There are plenty of men that live quite happily without wives, but then there are those that want them but cant find one. This leads to frustration and anger.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:26 PM
4

Im new to this subreddit. Im pretty damn liberal, but I find Mens Rights to be highly intriguing. Is this common here? Not that it matters where your political views lie if we all stay on the topic of Mens Rights. I just get the impression the majority are conservative, so Im curious.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:23 PM
2

It is until a lawyer calls for the exact definition in the law books and decides its best for his client if the definition is followed strictly to the letter.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:36 AM
1

"Unwanted" is the only definition that I think is important for sexual assault/rape, and even that can be blurry sometimes.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:48 PM
5

Just because a girl lets me finger her doesn't mean she is now obligated to blow me, especially if she didn't ask me to. I'm not sure how you think your point is relevant at all to the video clip. If I begin to give a girl a shoulder massage and she doesn't object, when I'm finished she isn't suddenly obligated to give me one and it would be fucked up to think so.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 08:51 PM
2

As a male, I actually prefer to be massaged by men. Larger/stronger hands and more surface area. I typically find them to give me generally better massages, all else being equal.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 05:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter