TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KoketkaKonfetka Archive

View 3 posts and 78 comments by KoketkaKonfetka on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Okay, I’ll correct myself - rapists and rape apologists are the only ones who perpetuate it. Not women (or men) who are victims of rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 06:41 PM
0

I’m sorry, how are women perpetuating rape culture? Rapists are the perpetuators of the culture, and the lack of reporting is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 05:44 PM
4

Girl, I hope he’s firmly an ex
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 05:02 PM
1

Lol her behaviour is disgusting because she said rapists are to blame for rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 05:01 PM
1

Cry me a river
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 04:59 PM
4

Someone’s salty
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:48 PM
2

Most people marry within their socioeconomic bracket. So it doesn’t really matter who makes 5-10k more a year. People marrying someone wildly different from them economically is the exception, not the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:31 AM
5

What else can a person offer, realistically? That’s what OP asked for, and that’s an answer given. As in - if a person loves another and believes in marriage they’re probably gonna get married, regardless of financial implications.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:06 AM
1

Bruh how many fathers do you want to be under 18? 20% is already high, kids shouldn’t be having kids😭
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 12:09 AM
0

Ikr this thread and the comments in it are honestly vile and ignorant. Thank god most people aren’t representative of this thread, and the consensus usually points toward people acknowledging inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 12:57 PM
1

Height - I’m tall so I don’t really care, as long as he’s taller than me which would be 5’8+. The first guy I was really infatuated by was my height, and it really didn’t seem to matter. Muscles - I really don’t care as long as the person takes care of themselves, is lean. I take care of myself so expect the same. Don’t even really like the gym bro physique. Money - this is important for me, so it’s something I’m not willing to compromise on, no matter what. I make a lot of money, I’m used to li…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 03:25 PM
1

Omg same, it really is amazing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 03:36 PM
1

Ew
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 09:31 PM
1

Hey some people will cheat no matter what, I agree. Cheaters suck. I have female friends that have slept with that many people probably (not that we know each other’s numbers). I wouldn’t class it as a good thing, but I wouldn’t class it as a bad thing. It would elicit a neutral response because usually a number is indicative of a person’s lifestyle, and so I would’ve guessed it anyway. Sometimes people do surprise you but again, it would be just another thing I know about a person, and wouldn’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 11:15 PM
1

Because if you’re 30 and say your number was 60 (as that was the original one you had a problem), and you were 18 when you became sexually active, then that’s only 5 people a year to get to that number. Say for 6 of these 12 years (18 to 30), so half of the time, the woman was single. Let’s say when she’s not single it’s like 3 men over 6 years (three 2 year relationships, and that’s being generous, as usually most relationships don’t last that long). So the other 57 would have to come from 6 ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 10:53 PM
1

I’d have questions as to why the number was 70 - what kind of lifestyle lead to that? If I didn’t end up minding her lifestyle choices and did decide to get into a relationship - then yes, the usual expectation of a relationship is exclusivity, and that is something I would expect from any rational adult. As a personal anecdote: my partner’s n count is around 50. We started off casually too. Ended up falling for each other. It has been absolutely awesome thus far. Not saying it’s the same for ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 10:01 PM
1

Why not? I don’t think an n number is indicative of potential loyalty as a partner, rather a lifestyle that a person leads or may have once lead. This number tells me she’s or probably was a party girl or had her fun in college or at some point in between her relationships etc. Same with a man. My first thought wouldn’t be “this number is so high because she/he is disloyal or cheated”.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 09:56 PM
1

I feel like we disagree about what that number should actually mean or effect though
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 03:17 PM
1

I mean it’s high but depending on how old she is and the context of her past relationships/how many years was she sexually active/etc. it can be totally explainable (same with guys). Personally, I don’t think a high number is a huge deal as long as the person is clean. Anything over 100 does make me pause though, but would not necessarily 100% deter me either.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:21 AM
3

The standard isn’t to be rich, its to out-earn the woman, which most men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:17 AM
1

Wait can you please link? Don’t know who camo even is
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 09:27 AM
2

Of course he doesn’t have to be! And most aren’t and still get dates. It’s just u/ConsequenceThat6209 said he’s in the best shape and is basically at the maximum level of attractiveness he can be - which he isn’t. And that’s okay. As I’ve said, the biggest thing physically that’s against him is his haircut. Then fashion and, most importantly, attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 11:34 PM
4

Yeah I mean if that’s what works for you and your partner then good for you!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 06:33 PM
4

You’re not “horrendous” but you definitely can improve. Firstly, your haircut. It’s really bad. I know it’s covid, but man. It’s the biggest downside. It’s just messy, and looks like no effort has been put into it at all. Secondly, your buccal fat (aka cheeks aka face fat). It’s just there. I understand it’s a physical feature for some people that they just can’t get rid of, but as others have mentioned, you can reduce it by losing just a bit of weight. I know you’ve mentioned being “as lean as …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 06:32 PM
6

I mean women, just like men, are all different. Some complain, some don’t. For some money is important for one reason or another, and others don’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 06:23 PM
3

Yes (assuming the good looking guy is actually a good person). But to be more accurate: Insane amounts of money/fame > looks > money
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 06:22 PM
6

There’s always ways to improve and to say otherwise is silly. Are you really in the top physical shape you can be? It’s okay to admit you’re not and work on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 06:15 PM
4

On OLD? Duh
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 06:12 PM
3

What is the point of generalisations like this
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 12:58 PM
17

It’s not even really a reliable source: “A new, not-so-scientific survey of 1,000 married women conducted by the Daily Mail found that 50 percent have a "fall-back partner" should their current marriage take a turn for the worse.” -HuffPost Which is basically unreliable data because 1) daily mail 2) we don’t actually get to see the raw data/ control variables of the study 3) another reference to this exact study by PressAndJournal.co.uk instead mentions this being 43%, so we don’t even know the …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 08:02 AM
4

Wtf. People don’t earn my respect because they’re attractive. If I respect someone it is because of their actions, their position in society or in relation to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 05:52 AM
2

Lmao wtf are you even talking about. So much ridiculousness and absolute bs. Honestly mate, you’re delusional and it’s sad. But I’ve got no more energy to spare you since clearly you’re resistant to common sense and logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 05:42 AM
3

Bruh
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 05:40 AM
8

Yeah honestly fair enough. It definitely upsets me but it seems some people are beyond help.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 05:15 AM
8

That’s the worst analogy ever simply because just as many people get ‘shocked’ by the ‘blue wire’ as there are by ‘pink’. So basically you’ve chosen the safest, saddest, and loneliest road based off a few poor experiences. Sucks for you mate but you can’t really complain or even call a whole gender ‘sociopaths’ when you clearly don’t even make an effort to understand them. P.S. Please aim to write using more coherent sentences. Punctuation exists for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 05:15 AM
1

))
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 05:12 AM
12

Yeah okay so you have had a poor experience. That’s anecdotal evidence. Then there are people who have had great experiences. I’ve met plenty of amazing women and men. So? How is it that after your poor experiences your logical conclusion wasn’t “huh, some people are shitty” but “all women are shitty ‘sociopaths and narcissists’”. Like yeah you and your friends had a poor experience. But then there are people who don’t. You know why? Because we’re all people. We’re all different. There are good …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 05:03 AM
16

But that’s just false
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 04:55 AM
5

And men are only about looks then
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 04:53 AM
16

That’s so hateful and untrue
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 04:52 AM
1

It’s not about the extent but validity itself and the conclusions drawn from results, as I’ve said. So perhaps a clearer way to phrase what I meant would be been that BP logic is ‘limited’ in its lack of presence in their rationing overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 11:55 PM
1

Well a few hours together is already better than just a picture on tinder. So there’s a grey area there. Also denying that the attraction grows over time, at least for women, is just wrong. Anecdotal evidence: my boyfriend and I started out as friends. When I first met him I wasn’t “oh my god this man is so hot, I wouldn’t mind sleeping with him now”, but overtime as we spent time together and I learned how awesome and funny, and smart he is I also grew to like him. That’s literally how crushes …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 11:53 PM
1

Well exactly. The logic is incredibly limited, and conclusions are rashly drawn.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 11:34 PM
3

Not true, it’s just for most women the physical attractiveness bar for a ONS is significantly higher than for a relationship. But then you find people more attractive the more you learn about them, the more their personality (even status for the cynical) shines etc. Attraction isn’t all just looks. Obviously you won’t just find an objectively unattractive person hit by hanging out with them. But a cute person with whom you wouldn’t just sleep with can turn ‘hot’ to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 11:33 PM
2

What do you even mean? If you’re in a relationship with someone then obviously you’re going to have sex. Casual sex means no strings attached, hence no relationship. In a casual scenario you don’t need to know anything about a person, you don’t care for the person, their ambitions, dreams, struggles, none of it matters. In a casual scenario looks are key because you’re after what a body, what can be offered physically, rather than emotionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 10:07 PM
2

Well that’s basically what I’ve said. Even if there are studies and empirical observations it is the conclusions that the Black Pill draws from them that are the crux of the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 10:04 PM
0

Enlighten me then, please. I would genuinely love to see a few studies that objectively prove that the Black Pill is accurate. But there aren’t any.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 07:13 PM
-1

They most definitely do not have the most robust/accurate (and accurately interpreted) data whatsoever. If anything, it’s always the regurgitation of old or niche studies that have not been repeated, and the results of which are vague/inconclusive that are then misinterpreted by the pill. Correlation = causation to them, they really believe anything if it just has numbers, not questioning sources at all. Even if there is some truth to some data it is still very much an echo chamber that doesn’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 07:09 PM
6

When it comes to sex, specifically casual sex, yes. This is undisputed. Looks aren’t king when it comes to relationships though. That’s not a BP acknowledgment. That’s a general acknowledgment by basically ~99% of the adult population.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 05:07 AM
8

Ofc not but that’s the thing: they do not see the world for what it is. Black Pill is a lot more of an echo chamber than other ‘pills’ or ideologies, and the objective reality it seems to present is still very much subjective, even more so than the reality presented by other pills, and based on anecdotal experiences of the few, not the many. The take on life, on women and men, on relationships, values, and principles is disturbingly generalised and cynical. It is not helpful, but depressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 04:51 AM
1

Maybe there’s a lil purple there but overall I’d say it’s a drop in the ocean of blue, yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 04:37 AM
2

But then by that definition you’d fit into Purple leaning Blue as well so it’s too vague. Equal view of genders is promoted by almost every pill, so you’ll have to be more specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 04:29 AM
3

Because it’s a very pessimistic take on life imho
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 04:26 AM
1

I’ve read some of your comments in this thread and honestly I pity you. I really wish you could see how profoundly wrong you are on basically every subject you mention. I’m exhausted by reading so much bs from an incel who constantly makes excuses for himself and his sexism. I hope you grow up and just do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 03:47 AM
3

How dare you
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 03:32 AM
1

For me it’s genuinely a natural desire but not always. I don’t want to put in effort every day to look incredible - so I don’t do my nails,hair, makeup every day. But you can still feel and look attractive by doing the very minimum in every occasion. I like being attractive, feeling attractive. I think it really helps my confidence and gives a bounce to my step; it makes me more self-satisfied and pushes me to do better, including socially. Looking good just makes me more productive, sociable, h…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 03:19 AM
9

I’m surprised and saddened by the high percentage of Black Pilled people here
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 03:14 AM
1

I think this is a great article that can shine a light on the issue. There’s a difference between what’s sexually attractive/arousing and what you actually want in a relationship, and that’s okay. It’s not a study or anything, but it’s honest, and relatable in parts for most women out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 05:16 PM
1

I think you’re completely wrong. Those are great places to meet women and actually the best place to learn how to accept rejection. It’s low stakes, and these are spaces meant for just that, so it’s socially acceptable to approach girls then, if at times awkward. But of course other places could work too. I’m on tinder and I meet some guys that way, others in clubs or through friends and parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 02:10 PM
1

Yeah absolutely
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 01:05 PM
1

Just because I’m meant to get a lot of money, doesn’t mean every woman in the world is. My situation doesn’t mean a wage gap doesn’t exist generally. I’m no socialist.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 07:12 AM
3

I- The amount of sweeping statements, proof-less claims, and unsubstantiated assumptions in what you just said are absolutely overwhelming. It’s so hard to argue with the points you’re trying to make because they’re so generalised and vague yet nevertheless so obviously false...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 10:23 PM
2

Ironically, you’re seeing Napoleon through your point of view that has been indoctrinated to think in terms of sex and reproduction value, rather than the real world. No one remembers Napoleon for being short (which he wasn’t, he was average, the propaganda campaign against him painted him as short in an attempt to emasculate him). Instead, people remember him for what he did, for who he was. It is a common joke for sure to mention his height (what a successful propaganda campaign it was, eh?), …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 12:45 PM
2

Right like if your sexuality is this fragile/malleable then... perhaps they’re not so straight to begin with. Basically they’re argument points to complete rely the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 02:09 PM
0

Exactly lol oh and don’t forget that the women have the privilege to cater to straight men!/s
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 10:10 AM
3

For real like how many leaps in logic does one have to take to come to such a conclusion
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 09:07 AM
1

Your first point is literally my point using different words - money is the point of Only Fans. Some men are into pegging? And not all gay OF involves you sticking stuff in your ass - same with women, not all of them film themselves riding dildos. That’s the point - you’re free to make whatever content you like, even SFW, regardless of your gender. And if you think content for gay women is the same as is for men, you’re wrong. It’s just not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 01:39 AM
6

“Won’t pretend to be gay just because of money”. Why then? That’s the point of OF. Money. If that’s where money is that’s what they should do. Women “pretend” to like their clients so why would it be so hard for men to do the same? Straight women would pretend to be gay if that’s where most of the profit came from. So it’s not really a matter of privilege it’s rather men being Choosing Beggars
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 12:53 AM
6

I’ve been following this thread and the lack of logic and proper reasoning from a lot of the men is slightly enraging. By definition privilege is a a special right granted or available only to a particular person or group. OnlyFans (OF) is available and open to everyone, whether you come from the side of a creator or a consumer. You HAVE the OPTION to take out your camera and make content, no matter what you have in your pants. Making money on OF is another issue - yes, it is true that most of O…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 12:50 AM
6

But why does that matter. That doesn’t take away men’s ability to post on OF. It doesn’t make one more privileged. You as a man can post, and it doesn’t matter who watches it because someone most definitely will. It’s about making income, right? So if you’re already on OF who cares who the money comes from?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 12:16 AM
11

It’s not like women on onlyfans want to fuck their clients. It’s about money and I’m sure other women might watch too, doesn’t make the content creator a certain sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 11:51 PM
5

They don’t want to be paid more than men. That was never the argument. They want to close the wage gap, which IS closing in the west. That’s it. No one wants to infringe upon “male rights”.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 10:51 PM
1

Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 09:27 PM
1

That’s just a plain lie. What do women and men want then, enlighten me?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 04:55 PM
3

What does that even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 09:07 AM
2

You’re not actually making a point. What do men do to build AND maintain civilisation that women don’t? By virtue of being a part of the civilisation women inherently help maintain and build it. It takes two.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 05:53 PM
3

“By people I mean men... women don’t build or maintain civilisation...but women do contribute to the destruction” - this is misogyny, delusion and denial on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 04:32 AM
4

Seriously, the levels of misogyny...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 05:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter