TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KrisK_lvin Archive

View 42 posts and 2,224 comments by KrisK_lvin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
164

StoryKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights08/02/15 08:42 AM
155

False AccusationKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:04 PM
134

Anti-MRMKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:19 AM
114

GeneralKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:09 AM
70

Anti-MRMKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:57 AM
53

Social IssuesKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:14 PM
52

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:50 PM
42

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights10/05/16 11:57 AM
38

Social IssuesKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights17/05/16 07:21 AM
32

Social IssuesKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:25 AM
28

Anti-MRMKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights20/02/16 09:51 PM
25

KrisK_lvin/r/MGTOW21/05/16 10:19 AM
25

KrisK_lvin/r/MGTOW27/04/16 06:13 AM
23

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights04/01/16 11:25 PM
22

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:49 PM
22

False AccusationsKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:55 AM
21

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights23/10/15 07:40 AM
21

GeneralKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights06/11/15 10:00 AM
21

Social IssuesKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:29 AM
21

Edu./Occu.KrisK_lvin/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:34 PM
20

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:37 AM
17

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights06/06/15 10:06 AM
17

Social IssuesKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights03/03/16 09:02 PM
17

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights06/01/16 08:49 AM
16

QuestionsKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights05/05/16 06:21 AM
15

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights13/01/16 01:08 AM
13

Social IssuesKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:25 PM
13

Social IssuesKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:22 PM
12

KrisK_lvin/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:42 PM
12

KrisK_lvin/r/MensRights22/01/16 07:57 AM
11

Social IssuesKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights18/04/16 09:46 PM
11

KrisK_lvin/r/MensRights11/02/16 09:15 PM
9

GeneralKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights28/05/15 04:38 PM
8

GeneralKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:34 PM
7

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:28 AM
6

False AccusationKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:58 PM
6

Social IssuesKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights15/10/15 11:44 AM
6

FeminismKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:27 PM
3

GeneralKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights09/03/16 11:12 AM
3

DiscussionKrisK_lvin/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 12:38 PM
3

DiscussionKrisK_lvin/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 11:07 AM
0

GeneralKrisK_lvin/r/MensRights18/11/15 08:16 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,224 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
40

If you’re in a privileged position and you start moaning about how hard you have it, you look like a crybaby. And yet on social media, I see this all the time, largely from groups and individuals who term themselves “Men’s Rights Activists”. What’s the betting that after identifying MRAs, all the examples he gives are from Return of Kings, PUAs and TERPers? Witness the misogynistic howls over the latest Ghostbusters film … As one men’s blogger wrote, … Oh, look a link RoK … who saw that coming? …
/r/MensRights23/05/16 10:48 AM
7

When I was younger, there was a story doing the rounds about a shoe factory. It was about a young guy of about 16 in his first job after leaving high school (for a long time, it was normal in the UK to leave at 16 not 18) - he was good-looking, but painfully shy and not very bright. He started out in the section where mostly women worked and day after day they would make crude sexual remarks about and to him (of the ‘I wouldn’t mind his balls banging against my ass’ variety) - mostly this was ju…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 07:52 AM
2

You can call out your attacker on Facebook. You can make fliers and post them around town. You can spread the word amongst your friends. There are limitless options. “limitless options”. Like Jackie Coakley’s? In Coakley’s telling, Monahan was a local boy she was in a relationship with, who then sprung a trap on her at a UVA frat party that resulted in gang rape. But a police investigation was unable to establish that Monahan even existed, and instead “he” appears to have been an invention of Co…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 10:29 PM
2

Troll much?
/r/MensRights22/05/16 04:01 PM
2

Perhaps - but it’s not in that line I quoted, I’m pretty sure.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:22 PM
3

The first casualty of any conflict is not innocence, but irony.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:51 PM
1

We're allowing the weakest and dumbest among us have all the power and lord over us. Eh? I think your point and mine are somewhat different.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:45 PM
1

Well, as we all know, Twitter mobs make the most dedicated activists … tapping away on their smartphones with their thumbs while sipping at their Starbucks double choca mocha frappucino ...
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:23 PM
24

Oh, what fresh hell is this? In order to measure this “gender gap,” researchers will videotape an unspecified number of “laboratory-based engineering teams” and “develop a reliable microaggressions assessment procedure,” which a series of focus groups will then use to rate the amount of microaggressions in each sample. Just fucking kill me now. What was the point of the Cold War if after winning it, the West just adopts every psychological trick in the book the Stasi ever came up with?
/r/MensRights22/05/16 01:49 PM
1

Does the university come from the whole population? Yes. No! I don’t know why this is so hard to grasp - the average IQ for the whole population in the UK is 100 with deviation between 85 and 115. If you accept - and fair enough if you don’t, but I do - that university students are at least of above average intelligence as according to the sources I quoted early on, then the university student population are only those with an average of 120+. So we’re only talking about that top tier - the crea…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:46 PM
1

Fair enough (I’m in Europe so it’s day-time and I’ve only worked a half day today as it’s Saturday). Anyway, the general consensus is that women as a whole are on average better at learning languages than men see e.g. here and here. That doesn’t mean no men can learn foreign languages or that all women have a natural flair for it, but it does run a bit counter to your experience. That said, just because something is the consensus view doesn’t necessarily mean it’s absolutely correct.
/r/MGTOW21/05/16 12:26 PM
1

TBH that link was just kind of meant as a joke … I mean a joke that has point to it, but still a joke. On average men learn the language much faster than the women. I’m interested in languages - you don’t have a source for that by any chance? No worries if you don’t.
/r/MGTOW21/05/16 11:51 AM
3

well, that figures. Marina Abramovic was another Sulkowicz mentor as well.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 11:49 AM
7

I’ve also noticed that this “discussion oriented” approach is way of claiming credit for work others have done …
/r/MGTOW21/05/16 11:14 AM
5

I suggested that his ex was a "crocodile girl" because they are viscous like a crocodile snapping its jaw on some prey. Viscous Best Freudian slip ever
/r/MGTOW21/05/16 10:22 AM
10

Is it just me or does that sound more like a weird defence of rape? No, I don’t think so - although any sane human being would be forgiven for thinking it could be. I think it might be even worse than that - she is implying that being repulsed by the crime of rape actually perpetuates rape because it makes rape victims ashamed to speak out about what’s happened to them. No retard could come up with anything as convoluted and ridiculous as that - only special training in Feminist logic could crea…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:11 AM
13

From the gallery website: Central to this work is also the idea that rape is more than an unwanted sexual act, that it is the foundation for the entire institution of the patriarchy, and hence it is the crucial battleground for dismantling male power. Edit Added: from the same website: Our horrified reaction to the subject of rape isn’t just about our desire to eradicate the epidemic, if it was it would go hand in hand with legal reforms, political prioritisation, and a genuine support for victi…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 08:48 AM
4

That’s just broken my fucking brain.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 08:36 AM
0

I appreciate the time you’re taking for this back and forth, by the way, frustrating as you might be finding it. 1: Of those qualified for STEM, there's more men than women It’s tiresome to repeat this (for me as well as you), but if the sources I cited much earlier are correct, and that the average IQ of all university students is ranges from 120-145, then this statement only applies to the whole population not the population at university. I take you to be rejecting the claims made in this sou…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 08:22 AM
1

My argument is that … I’m well aware of what your argument is and as far as it goes I agree with it - as I have pointed out more than once already. The main points of contention are that: I am arguing that most women don’t go into STEM fields because they choose not to do so You are arguing that the reason why most women’s participation rates is consistently low in those subjects because they simply don’t have the IQ they would need to participate I am also arguing that it is an unfair mischarac…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:46 PM
1

This is a slam job against homeopathic medicine Yup – off topic here Nope
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:23 PM
1

I don't think you quite understand what STEM subjects are. Oh, you’re taking the fucking piss now, mate. No, they are not "only open to university graduates”. Puh ha ha ha ha ha - yeah sure, fuck wit
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:22 PM
1

IQ tests measure reasoning and problem solving skills. No, that's not the "full range" of applications, … OK then. So the initial statement I made that set this exchange off was: [I]n short, I agree that there likely are some cognitive/mental differences, but how that can be distinguished from the influence of other variables I just don’t know […] in effect, in terms of intelligence for sure I think men and woman are the same on balance. If you accept that IQ only tests a restricted range of ski…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 04:25 PM
1

If It takes greater than average IQ, there simply are more men than women in that group. As I’ve pointed out, the university admissions numbers tell a different story - if we narrow it down to only include elite schools such as Harvard, Yale, Oxford, Cambridge etc. then we’re talking an average IQ of 145 in a population of approximately 55% women and 45% men. For your point to be true, you would need to show evidence that (a) the average IQ of students taking, say, English Literature is actually…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 02:26 PM
1

Don't you understand that this is primarily politics? PC politics and social engineering gone mad. Don’t you understand that these are at least two entirely separate issues and you’re not separating them out? This was your statement: Women's weakness in STEM is just one example [of the fact that men and women have different cognitive abilities] And you also agreed with u/Demonspawn that: in the group of people with IQs of 120+, there are two men for every one woman These are two separate issues.…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 09:35 AM
2

Let's cut the guy some slack That Thales-to-Aristotle guy, the one who made that post discussed in that video, does deserve a certain amount of sympathy it’s true. Then again … these are some other comments from the same guy (I can’t link to them because links to the sub where he made a lot of these comments are automatically deleted from this sub - but unless he’s deleted them, you can find them in a search if you don’t believe me): I've met MRAs who assault feminists and rape women. And this: …
/r/MensRights20/05/16 09:20 AM
1

I have a strong suspicion that you’re not half as clever as you believe you are; or possibly you’re just not very well read? Either way, if you believe that I’m wrong, have a look at the response I made to the other guy in this sub-thread and explain to me again how a relatively low IQ is the reason there are fewer women in STEM subjects overall. This isn’t damselling - this is evidence based. I’ve provided sources - where are yours?
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:36 AM
1

From the evolutionary perspective, women's brains were designed for the work that women did. Jesus I wish I knew what happened when your brain evolved ...
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:28 AM
1

It looks like someone is unaware of the irony of having him talk about IQ. Dunning-Kruger effect in da house!
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:27 AM
1

Actually it is, but that's not an insult to women. Thanks for your response - I don’t claim to be an expert, but I still have a few issues with this idea that are based on far more than just a misguided and stubborn insistence that things must be equal because that’s the ideal (if you look up thread, I’ve already acknowledged that there are cognitive differences between men and women, I just disagree with the extent of the impact and some of the conclusions people draw based on that). So if you …
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:17 AM
1

Poppycock.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 11:10 PM
1

You should worry mate, it’s my political party that she’s dragging through the dirt with her Billy fucking Smart’s Circus antics
/r/MensRights19/05/16 10:43 PM
1

This is wrong. No, it isn’t. Or at least this right here: Women's weakness in STEM is just one example. That’s not proof that women are ‘weak’. There are multiple factors as to why fewer women go into STEM subjects. Systemic gender discrimination against women is emphatically not one of those factors. Neither is a lack of intellect.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 10:42 PM
1

what a cunt Well, that would describe 99% of all politicians - but what’s special about this particular loud-mouthed cunt is that she’s so utterly incompetent that she’s a walking clusterfuck - that is just the most famous incident of her first 12 months in Parliament - she makes another fuck-up almost every other week. She’s a complete clown. And you know what else? She’s one of the least experienced MPs to ever set foot in the place - naturally, she was parachuted into the seat on an all-women…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 10:39 PM
2

That Bradford Wilcox guy is such an asshole.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 10:34 PM
1

British MP Jess Phillips - read ‘em and weep
/r/MensRights19/05/16 10:28 PM
1

They’re not the same, but some feminists, maybe even quite a lot of them, are also on the Far Left (but not necessarily Communists). Laurie Penny would be a good example, but she’s not alone.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 10:27 PM
1

Hmm: As for the Presidency I would propose a ban on white cis-male candidates until members of other groups have been able to serve office for at least 232 more years. Even as a slightly tongue-in-cheek thought … that takes some saying.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 10:17 PM
0

I think there are cognitive/mental differences, for sure, but I don’t think they should be overstated e.g. ... women notoriously have poor spatial awareness and co-ordination What is this based on? What about dancing? I don’t mean all women are natural born ballet dancers and nor do I mean that men can’t dance either as they certainly can - but there are enough ‘average’ women with enough dancing ability to suggest that they can’t be that poor at either spatial awareness or co-ordination. So in …
/r/MensRights19/05/16 07:26 PM
1

To be honest, I just don’t know so I’m sure you and /u/nerdkingpa are right - but if they are doing that then the test is definitely not valid because it isn’t a measure of what it claims to be measuring. Then again, it’s not reliable either if it can spring 10% in the space of a year so … there’s that.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 07:11 PM
148

Here come the band of trolls right on cue Jesus wept … That’s more than hypocrisy - that's raising delusion to the level of an art form. The only other time I’ve heard of that degree of denial in the face of the facts was when Bill Hicks talked about the trial of the cops who gave Rodney King a beating: Did you guys see these cops testifyin', man? Did these guys have balls, or what, man? These guys carry their balls in a wheelbarrow, man. – 'Scuse me, 'scuse me. Man with big balls here to testif…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:26 PM
23

"When it's a one-to-one race, men still tend to fare better because of their prior experience and personal connections … Well, who knew? The candidate with more experience and contacts tends to do better over the candidate with less experience and fewer contacts. Obviously, the solution to that is to have more politicians with less experience … I mean, what could possibly go wrong there?
/r/MensRights19/05/16 03:02 PM
6

You seem confident about that statement.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 02:58 PM
3

I had the reaction of "in a test of engineering skills, they were testing communicating and collaborating” Where’s an Oxford comma when you need one ; - )? Even without it, I’m pretty sure that each of the test points was separate (i.e. (1) understanding technological principles, (2) designing solutions and (3) communicating and collaborating). But maybe you know more about it than me. I also noticed that it said: It was a computer-based test that asked students not only to answer discrete quest…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 11:09 AM
3

Movies aren’t real life, and neither were Rockwell’s Saturday Morning Post covers. The period you are talking about included the Russo-Japanese war, the Great Depression of 1912, World War I, the 1916 Easter rising, the Russian Revolution, the Russian Civil War, the rise of Stalin, the Irish War of Independence, the 1929 Wall Street Crash, the Dust Bowl era Depression, Prohibition and the rise of Mafia gangsterism, the rise of Hitler and Mussolini, the Japanese invasion of Manchuria, the Spanish…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 07:47 AM
0

No - I still stand by that. It’s just there’s just not much more to say on the matter, I don’t think. Edit The fact that it may not apply to you in particular does not make it wrong in general.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 07:06 AM
1

OK then.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 06:58 AM
0

What's your point, though? That people who have a masochistic fetish are morons? No, it’s that as a humiliation it’s hardly likely to become something someone is going to rehabilitate and adopt in the way for example gay and queer were taken on. The idea of cuckold pride would literally be an oxymoron - if you were proud of it, the humiliation aspect wouldn’t affect you in which case you wouldn’t properly speaking be a cuckold. In any case, human sexuality is extremely diverse and I’m not judgin…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 06:41 AM
10

Among eighth-grade students in public and private schools, 45 percent of girls and 42 percent of boys scored proficient on the exam, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, or NAEP. So we’re talking about 13 year-olds, is that right? No doubt someone is going to use this to demonstrate that sexism against girls deters them from pursuing a career in STEM subjects even though they are shown here to be slightly better overall. But that report tells you nothing about what the kids’ personal…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 06:10 AM
1

This being Internetland, I really can’t tell whether or not you meant to put '/s’ at the end of that. It's just a fetish. But it’s a masochistic one, right? About being humiliated?
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:32 AM
1

Check this out as well.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:29 AM
1

This rock thrower
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:26 AM
1

I have no issue with her asking for equal money now because I do think her role demands it I think everyone here pretty much agrees with that (with a few irascible exceptions) the problem I have is that she went public anyway and tried to make it a sexism issue when it wasn't. She asked for money and Netflix obliged. I don't think it's Netflix responsibility to pay her more money if she doesn't ask it. Absolutely.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:21 AM
3

It's one thing to walk into a negotiation and ask for a larger piece of the pie based on the importance of the role, and what you bring to the table. It's entirely different to say "pay me or I tell everyone you hate women”. Yep - that.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:15 PM
1

Really? Blimey - I recognised the name, but had no idea.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 03:55 PM
6

Because I can't remember anything else she's been in since Forrest Gump. Oh, my God is that who she is? Holy crap, I had no idea.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 12:57 PM
12

I think the men's rights movement has better things to talk about than this. It’s a fair point to make, but I think you have to take a few things into consideration if you haven’t already: Firstly, he’s practically a household name whereas she … I had to Google her (and I’m sure I’m not the only one) - but she nevertheless feels that as a co-star she should be receiving equal renumeration to him; Secondly, the article heavily implies that the reason for her not getting paid as highly as Spacey i…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 12:56 PM
2

I'm not sure if one word that is not likely to be widely used would have much impact. I think it all depends on whether you looking at this view from the point of view of the system or the people who use the system, how they use it and why. I think one of the major flaws in a lot of Feminism is that it makes an odd marriage of very intense personal emotion with a depersonalised systemic view on things. One result of that is that they can become enraged over the use of fairly innocuous words and …
/r/MensRights18/05/16 12:06 PM
13

Going public only works if the studio is doing something illegal. which it wasn't… Take your point, but when so-called ‘progressive’ activists are so keen to use accusations of sexism, misogyny, racism and so on to shame individuals and organisations it can make a difference even the people being shamed aren’t doing anything illegal.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 11:49 AM
2

Actually, another quick and slightly more serious point about the use of words and language: Advocates of Feminism and Social Justice (i.e. people who do degrees in X, Y, Z Studies) are generally quite obsessive about language and the words people use; Broadly speaking, one idea of theirs can be summarised as: "If language shapes lived experience, lived experience can therefore be re-shaped using language” - that is, change the words and you change the world; Language is a complex and interrelat…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 11:47 AM
6

So what should we do with this word? Use it, censor it, ignore it, try to rehabilitate it, or something else? Definitely not censor it. Words and phrases come and go in waves, as you’ve already noticed with mangina which is still around, but probably less popular than it was. I wouldn’t bother rehabilitating it and don’t think it’s possible - while some groups can adopt what was originally an insult and make it their own with pride e.g. gay, queer, tranny - it’s never going to work for cuck … it…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 11:29 AM
12

She negotiated like men do in wage negotiations. Sure, yes she did - and the best of luck to her. But then The Guardian reports this kind of negotiation as if it is some kind of extra burden on her as a woman: Robin Wright has described how she had to fight to be paid the same amount as co-star Kevin Spacey … Aren’t all negotiations over wage and conditions with your employers a fight of sorts, regardless of gender? It's almost as if they are implying men like Spacey just get thrown millions of …
/r/MensRights18/05/16 11:20 AM
1

Yes, that too for sure.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 07:23 PM
1

Well, there is that, yes.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 04:11 PM
3

September can't get here fast enough. Puh ha ha ha ha ha. Good one. OK, my mistake then - you’re not depressed just a cunt. Have it your way.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 03:47 PM
5

Women naturally lie, deceive, and manipulate. When a woman attempts suicide she's just trying to manipulate someone. Neither of these points are true. That’s not denial - I think you likely know that yourself. You seem to be in a dark place right now; people who says such things often are - it’s why they say them. I hope you manage to see a way of that place - because there is a way back.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 03:03 PM
6

You’re going to have to explain the pronoun thing to me, as I just don’t get it. A woman has avoided jail despite luring her ex-boyfriend to her home where he was beaten, bound and humiliated by two other men. The three attackers all avoided prison on suspended sentences this week after admitting causing actual bodily harm (ABH). I really fucking hate the UK’s pathetic justice system.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 02:32 PM
5

I think the boring answer is that they just mean when a 10-17 year old is trying alcohol, possibly for the first time, it’s not their intention to drink themselves into hospital. I’m guessing they’ve included it under more intentional attempts to poison themselves on the grounds that kids that age aren’t supposed to be using alcohol in the first place.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 02:29 PM
1

True enough.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:51 AM
4

You make a very reasonable point, but I think my complaint is still valid. Obviously, if the key finding is that rates of intentional poisoning for girls and young women aged 10-17 have doubled over the last 20 years then that is noteworthy and I have no problem with them leading off with that issue. However, my issue is more that there is not even a one-line acknowledgment or concession to the effect that “Although boys in the same age group commit suicide at a rate three times that of girls, t…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:04 AM
11

I know this is the kind of thing that gets this place a bad name, and no one is suggesting that we shouldn’t care about a rise in the number of teenage girls in the UK who are intentionally poisoning themselves, especially through a harmful overdose of drugs rather than alcohol. But … latest figures for Suicides in the United Kingdom, 2013 Registrations from the UK’s Office of National Statistics again report that: There were 4,722 suicides among people aged 15 and over registered in England in …
/r/MensRights17/05/16 07:31 AM
2

From the report: The show's sixth winner, of the "Ray Bradbury Award for Outstanding Dramatic Presentation" — which recognizes excellence in screenwriting — was the writing team behind Mad Max: Fury Road. Screenwriters George Miller, Brendan McCarthy and Nick Lathouris are all men, but they crafted one of the most progressive, female-empowering sci-fi films to date in Fury Road. Because I know that whenever I’m browsing the Sci-Fi shelves in a book store, my first priority is to find "progressiv…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 06:44 AM
1

The below-the-line comments are worth reading as well - two points stick out here for me: A Mother wrote on April 9: One point I would like to raise is a reward of victimhood that has not been mentioned – compensation … If sympathy and attention is enough to encourage people to lie the prospect of a large financial payment (starting point is £11,000, for rape) is a huge added incentive. […] The trauma and anguish never ends for those falsely accused even after clearing their name. The stigma rem…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 06:41 AM
1

We should sticky this.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 06:26 AM
1

Yeah, that's a reasonable response. /s Because of course one irascible comment written one time in a fit of pique in one thread on one day on Reddit absolutely demonstrates a principled philosophy for life. / s Twat.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 06:08 AM
6

You're part of the problem. Fuck off mate
/r/MensRights16/05/16 07:06 PM
1

Wow, that sounds like an amazing opportunity - and don’t worry, I realise it’s not a competition but I was trying to say there’s a similar theme running through all these kinds of episodes, big or small. Good luck with your training and everything else, too.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:05 PM
17

Heh, good point. Another time, I was at the train station watching a very flustered looking woman with three small children, one in a push chair, trying to board the train. With one kid still in the push chair, she was having a hell of a time of it - without thinking, I just bent down to lift up the front bar to help her onto the train. The fucking crazy bitch went absolutely mental: “YES! I’VE GOT IT THANK YOU VERY MUCH! I DON’T NEED YOUR HELP!!” This was followed with the typical sound of smir…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 04:11 PM
6

That sounds awful - I’m really sorry to hear that you’ve had these experiences and are still having them even now. Especially if it’s so bad that you need to move. The experience I described is clearly trivial compared to yours (though I stress it’s just one example of dozens of similar ones I could also have mentioned - all also trivial). But even so, I think it’s still symptomatic of a much wider issue and one that, as in your case, can lead to much more serious consequences. I think it was th…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 04:06 PM
1

Or ... it means you’re a total cunt. There is always that possibility.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:58 PM
-1

You’re such a faggot, lol
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:27 PM
35

Fantastic article. Do I protect myself from possible hysterical accusations or do I do the right thing and help a kid in need? Even just the other day I had a ridiculous example of this - I was on my bike waiting at the lights to cross when just over to my right was a little boy of something like 2 or 3 on a tricycle. His mum was further ahead of him pushing a pram with a baby in it and so the little boy was stuck behind - there was a big kerbstone and no matter how hard he tried, every time he …
/r/MensRights16/05/16 10:41 AM
-1

Many words but not a real answer. I think the word “no” is pretty fucking clear. I also gave two specific reasons - first, that this was one only out of 117,753 subscribers; second, that you assumed that the user in question must be sympathetic to MR because he was writing in this sub - there’s no reason to think that’s true. That is an answer - you just don’t like it.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 10:27 AM
-1

It is clear feminism has won a full, complete, and likely irreversible victory when a Men's Right's board is so whimpified, emasculated, pussywhipped, and castrated as to censor its own side on spurious grounds of misogyny. Actually, no. Firstly, only one user has made this comment - it’s a bit of a leap to come to declare a "likely irreversible victory” for Feminism on the basis of one comment from one guy out 117,753 subscribers. Not every user this sub is sympathetic to its causes and interes…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 08:39 AM
10

This is textbook Stockholm syndrome Are you sure? The greater power has truly triumphed when it compels the weaker to self-censorship. That’s hegemony. Stockholm syndrome is when you form an emotional bond with someone who has power over you - you wouldn’t self-censor in that case, but actively take the side of the group that has power over you.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:58 PM
3

That’s sort of how the Internet works ...
/r/MensRights15/05/16 03:18 PM
-3

Yeah, but it’s fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:54 PM
4

Jesus man, how fucking retarded are you? This is r/TwoXChromosomes moderation policy for submissions: Please submit content that is relevant to our experiences as women, for women, or about women. So the reason why that "post was deleted in the span of 20 minutes” is because it was about a man’s experience and was irrelevant. Also this: I told her that I felt very betrayed, and she said that if I really loved her I would accept the child as my own and wouldn't try to restrict her reproductive au…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:12 PM
1

What? Why? This is dumb.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:03 PM
1

So pretty much it has nothing to do with biology. Correct it is. Fast you learn young master.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:37 PM
0

Meh.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:37 PM
1

Good questions - type those into the encyclopaedia and see what comes up.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:28 PM
6

Am I crazy? Am I just seeing this through a "men's rights lens"? Or is this a bit fucked? I think it’s worth remembering that you were seeing it though the director’s lens primarily. Watch the clip again and notice how the audio you hear doesn’t match up with the images you see at least half the time. What that strongly suggests is that more detailed explanation of her domestic violence claim was heard by the audience in the hall, but edited out of the broadcast version of the show - partly beca…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:26 PM
1

If the wife's fling doesn't want the baby, why can't he force the wife to abort the baby, just in case? I don’t understand that - the wife isn’t pregnant, only the mistress. Women expects men to be supportive and forgiving of their ‘mistakes’ ... There’s a crucial difference: in OP's linked story, the starting point of the issue is the confession of an affair; whereas in paternity fraud, there is almost certainly never going to be a confession, only a discovery. The woman in that linked story wi…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:09 PM
1

You really need to get into the habit of using an encyclopaedia more often. This is a good one. Here’s the explanation of ego.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:47 AM
1

Reverse the genders and you'll see it. No, I get the point about the gender reversal it just still doesn’t make any sense. Paternity fraud is when he has absolutely no idea that the child isn’t his own exactly as you say and either never finds out or only finds out at a much later time - by which point he has already likely formed a bond with that child as if it really were his own. That doesn’t apply here because it’s very obviously and literally not her child. Therefore this post has nothing t…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:43 AM
1

OP’s probably talking about this story: Woman's high-heel petition receives 100,000-plus signatures Nicola Thorp, who was sent home for not wearing heels at PwC, says response shows importance of reforming dress codes
/r/MensRights15/05/16 09:01 AM
1

This post doesn’t make any sense. The OP from r/TwoXChromosomes has just received the devastating news that her husband of two years: has been having an affair with another woman he met at the gym and that she is now pregnant. She doesn't really want the baby but she said she would give birth to it and sign all rights to him. My husband wants to bring the baby into our family and wants me to be the mother to this other woman's child. To be honest, the story sounds so outlandish that I think it’s…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:53 AM
0

he's not an MRA and this doesn't belong here! I appreciate your point of view, but I still defend my reasons for posting this here - see above for details.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:50 AM
2

Not at all - it was a suggestion made by one user for borderline on/off topic personal posts such as this one - FWIW I think it’s a good idea, especially if it remains voluntary to do so (no one made me do that, I just did)
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:47 AM
9

I am so deeply sorry that this has happened.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:57 AM
1

Like I say, I’d need to read the book to say for sure what I think he’s doing.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 07:33 PM
1

I haven’t read it so can’t say for sure, but I would assume that he’s very, very unlikely to be serious if he’s suggesting men should take hormones in order to breast feed children.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 07:17 PM
2

So is he essentially parodying female chauvinists then? No. It’s not a parody. You’re still in high school, I think right? I’m pretty sure it was you that said you were 17 the other day. Anyway, I can promise you that when somebody writes "It's tempting to (do) X” as in: It's tempting to restate this fact in emotionally loaded terms. What they mean is It’s tempting for you / for someone else to do X, Y, Z but they would be completely wrong to do it. It’s a more polite way of saying “If you think…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:53 PM
1

I found the reference to this study to be really interesting: Pornography Actresses: An Assessment of the Damaged Goods Hypothesis I have never once read an article or seen a documentary in MSM that has suggested anything other than the strong Feminist interpretation - that all porn actresses were sexually abused as children and go into porn as a kind of acting out of that early trauma. They are also always portrayed as being mentally scarred for life after the model of Linda Boreman (i.e. Linda…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:48 PM
1

No, no - in that part that you quoted at least he’s not saying that at all. What he’s saying there is that you shouldn’t conclude that being a man is superior because you rise above the ‘default’ state of being female, but you also shouldn’t believe that women are superior for the same reason. He’s actually criticising any sexist conclusion from the facts about how the sex chromosome works - whether you’re a male chauvinist or a female chauvinist (i.e. a Feminist). Like I said, I haven’t read th…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:38 PM
0

No, I’ve just said that I don’t - but as I also said, I’ve only read the pages around your quote and not the whole chapter, but even so if a writer says "It's tempting to restate this fact in emotionally loaded terms.” at the beginning of the paragraph, it’s a pretty strong signal that he doesn’t agree with the views that come next - just because they’re in his book it doesn’t mean that they’re his own personal views.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:31 PM
1

Are a lot of anthropologists and biologists misandrists? I think it’s unlikely to be frank - certainly in the case of biologists (if they’re any good at what they do that is). Anthropologists, especially social anthropologists, are generally more likely to be Feminists or sympathetic to Feminism as I think there’s quite a lot of overlap between theory that anthropologists use and theory that Feminists use. It doesn’t make them misandrists as such (unless you believe all feminists are misandrists…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:19 PM
5

I think you might possibly want to look at the chapter again as you seem to be possibly reading too much into it. I’ve only looked quickly on Google so haven’t read the entire chapter, but in the section you are talking about I’m almost certain Diamond is not doing what you think he’s doing. After explaining that only one of the 23 pairs of chromosomes determines biological sex, he points out that when a Y chromosome is present, testes will develop from week 7 of the pregnancy, but if there’s no…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:11 PM
55

Some kind of criminal conviction ought to follow … worse still in Banks’s case was that the accuser, Wanetta Gibson: … had admitted to Banks the alleged kidnap and rape did not happen, but did not want to tell prosecutors in case she lost the payout her family had won in a suit against Long Beach Schools. So not only did he go to jail an innocent man, but her family received tax payer’s money from fraudulently suing the school system. … Banks said something to upset Gibson and they parted on bad…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 03:41 PM
49

Harvard’s resident feminists claim that all-female organizations, while just as gender-biased, are beneficial to the school’s community, whereas all-male organizations are merely breeding grounds for the present and future perpetrators of sexual crime. Fuck’s sake
/r/MensRights13/05/16 12:16 PM
5

… it is clear that equality has become a somewhat one-sided affair in universities. That sentence though … just … wow
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:17 AM
1

Absolute lunacy. Indeed.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 05:06 AM
5

Among white boys from disadvantaged families only about 10% will go to university - the lowest of any social or ethnic group. I’ve literally been saying this for well over 15 years now because it was so obvious to me, but in general the response was ‘Yeah, but white men own everything’ or some other sentiment along those lines. I can only recall one woman agreeing with my assessment, but the she was brought up in the same region as me and had a similar background to mine so she knew if from expe…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 03:28 PM
1

It's irrelevant how many of the speakers/"experts"/journalists that write/speak/host hold liberal/left values, because the subjects and framing of the debate is controlled by those on the right. You know what? I’m not going to debate you on this point - if you want to take that as vindication that your point of view is the correct one, the fine you go ahead and do that. But I will say this - and for me, even if not for you, it’s a really important point - the failure of Communism, of Socialism, …
/r/MensRights11/05/16 08:05 PM
1

It looks a lot like the image could have been made by a troll. It may well have been written by a troll, but if it was it was written by one who understands at least one fairly well-known strand in Feminist thinking. Clearly, not all Feminists believe this, but even the ones who don’t will advocate for policies or fight causes that axiomatically have that notion as a basis. It’s only a really quite short step from believing in systemic oppression that teaches women to see themselves as objects t…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:53 AM
1

No! I missed that detail!
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:03 AM
4

You are well out of touch. I see. Do tell. Your claim that you understand actual feminists better than they know themselves … And, I suppose you are one such “actual feminist” are you? As opposed to all the “fake” ones? Your claim … is circular thinking, a common component of delusions. Oh, dear. If you are going to play the logical fallacy Easter egg hunt with a throwaway comment by a random stranger on Reddit, then at least choose the right fallacy you fucking dolt. This here ... "if any Femin…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:12 AM
1

Christ almighty … that level of cringe could be marketed as a laxative ...
/r/MensRights10/05/16 10:34 PM
6

Hysterical? Hyperbole? Deranged? Maybe just bullshit with an outrageous comparison of a rocky marriage to the Nazi extermination of the millions of people, primarily Jews, but also the gypsies, Slavs, Communists, the disabled and homosexuals. Betty Friedan’s not really a key figure any more, I don’t think, is she? Being a 'just a housewife' is simply not an option for the majority of women nowadays regardless of whether they 'grow up wanting to be’ one or not. Edit She wasn’t the only one - Andr…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 10:28 PM
5

Hmm... it's either biology or narcissism. If it helps any, the context for that statement is that she was describing how groups of radical Feminist women would first steal porno mags from sex shops after which they would sit around in a circle discussing the ‘meaning’ of the images of women and what that meant for them. The woman, Linda Bellos, explains that they had to discuss the magazines in a group because it would be too disturbing otherwise. The interviewer asks her whether or not she mean…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 09:20 PM
4

And the dark-haired one said it was a "a stupid, horrible mistake” that she plotted an fake armed robbery with an accomplice who in turn pretended to feint with shock to give her more time to get away. That’s some fucking idea of a mistake she’s got there. On Aug. 15, Perez arrived at the Security National Bank branch at Hy-Vee, 2827 Hamilton Blvd., in disguise and passed Zevenbergen, who was a bank employee, a note demanding cash and saying she was armed. Zevenbergen then gave Perez $10,000. As…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 06:31 PM
4

The blonde one cried though, so obviously she must be like, rilly, rilly, rilly sorry and stuff … and what better reason is there to let her go than that! / s
/r/MensRights10/05/16 06:26 PM
3

Why do you want to know and how come you just didn’t Google it? I mean it’s a serious question - there is no obvious connection I can see between this question and anything to do with civil or legal rights.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 06:23 PM
1

He’s a tit.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:49 PM
1

Then let me simplify it too - media is a valuable commodity so understandably it is ultimately owned by people with a lot of money - however, you seem to be assuming that wealthy people are by definition going to be Conservative or at least right of centre. Not at all - some of the most privileged people in the land both then and now are much further to the Left than the general population by quite a large margin if for no other reason than they’ve been spared the practical complications of havi…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:24 PM
5

Alright, I’ll give you that one!
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:16 PM
4

This video is the gift that keeps on giving c. 46’15”: Identity politics were used by some people as a way to shut others up … By the way, this radical Feminist Al Garthwaite saying this, she continues: … or for them to gain power. This will always happen. And it was not, in the end, positive. I can’t think of anything good to say. And this bit: interviewer There is something sort of Lord of the Flies about it. Radical Feminist Yes, it was! It became quite sinister. It was a bit Lord-of-the-Flie…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:15 PM
1

And if you think I’m, watching that tinfoil bullshit, you’ve another think coming. You’re just wrong, but it’s flattering to see yourself marginalised because that way you can excuse the complete failure of your ideas to external powers and not bother looking at the fact that they’re basically just a bit shit.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:03 PM
5

Paul Mason, Laurie Penny, Zoe Williams, Jon Snow, Polly Toynbee, and Ian Katz are “comedians” are they?
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:02 PM
2

Yes, sure, but I think calling it that suggests that it hasn’t become practically mainstream in Feminist thinking, which it has absolutely. Every time we hear about Rape Culture, Campus Rape, and Consent classes, we are seeing the consequence of those ideas filtered down into so-called ‘Third Wave’ or ‘Fourth Wave’ Feminism.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 03:51 PM
6

Oh they exist in reality, just not in the media, where it matters. ie they have no platform/influence. Puh-ha ha ha ha ha oh my aching ass! Paul Mason? Laurie Penny? Zoe Williams? Jon Snow? Polly Toynbee? Ian Katz? The entire panel of the BBC’s News Quiz - Jeremy Hardy, Mark Steel, Sandie Toksvig as was? Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of Conservative voices in the media, but to say that the Hard Left has no presence or influence in the media is ludicrous. You implied it was more evident on…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 03:30 PM
4

The "hard left" barely exists. Didn’t you read what I wrote? I know the people I’m talking about It fucking exists, I know quite a lot of them and they are a pain in my fucking ass. You mean like all those cunts on the right … You didn’t read what I wrote, did you? There are cunts like this on the right as well, …
/r/MensRights10/05/16 03:00 PM
6

One other thing that I cannot stress enough - these ideas are not outliers, these people are not on the margins. They are at the hard core of their political ideology and pretty much everything you hear coming from out of the mouths of the younger generation is either simply a repetition of these early 70s activists or is clearly heavily indebted to it. I mean, they will argue that someone like Judith Butler is completely different from these early Feminists ideas, but that says more about the n…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 02:58 PM
2

That’s Linda Bellos, who I’ve quoted above. What’s significant to me is that they were clearly half-mad but they wouldn’t tolerate dissent or even admit that what they were doing was absolutely morally unjustifiable - look at this bit: I'd been to some events – oh God when was this? Maybe early 80's? – where women who had sons weren't allowed to leave their sons in the crèche – you could only leave your daughters in the crèche. Um, that just really wound me up, stuff like that. That for me was a…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 02:42 PM
4

No, it isn’t - who else is calling for this woman to be hung drawn and quartered? Believe me, I know the people I’m talking about and they completely lose the plot whenever something like this comes up. They’ve spent most of the last year trying to purge their own party of anyone they think has impure politics let alone randoms from the BBC. There are cunts like this on the right as well, but it’s not them that will be getting hot and bothered over Corbyn’s profile in the media on this occasion.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 02:01 PM
6

What’s funny about this to me is it’s the Margaret Thatcher / Ann Coulter syndrome: If the woman receiving the abuse has the ‘right’ politics, then it is a scandal of epic proportions and an attempt by the Patriarchy to silence women’s voices with the threat of sexual violence … If the woman receiving the abuse has the ‘wrong’ politics - or not even the wrong politics, but is just accused of being bias against Jeremy Corbyn, then it’s absolutely fair game to call her "a whore and a bitch on Twit…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 01:54 PM
14

Other priceless quotes from this documentary are below. And by the way, the women being interviewed are described as 'radical' Feminists as if to suggest that they are on the fringes. They are not. Look at the jobs they have and the platforms in education and the media they hold. These are still leading lights in the movement and their ideas inspire others, even if now some of them are being criticized as TERFs' (i.e. Feminists who refuse to acknowledge trans-women as women). Sheila Jeffrys, ret…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 11:58 AM
12

Yes, absolutely. And this is not a new thing and neither is it something that can only be pinned on some Feminists. This is a core tenet of Feminism and has been since the early 1970s - if any Feminist you meet scoffs as this and says ‘Oh no, that’s not real Feminism’ they’re either lying or ignorant. A founding principle driving second wave Feminism from the 70s which is still at the core of all the variations is fundamentally that women’s liberation means being liberated from men. All of the 1…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 11:22 AM
1

Oh, yes, I suppose that would make sense, wouldn’t it?
/r/MensRights10/05/16 11:11 AM
1

Why? As in why do you think that field is more susceptible than others? (I’m not disagreeing, it just seems odd).
/r/MensRights10/05/16 07:37 AM
1

I’ve not only addressed your points, but I’ve also explained in detail why I’m being insulting. You are supercilious little shit and I have no interest in wasting any further time with someone as pompous and arrogant as you are.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 09:24 PM
1

I fail to see why that view is bad. I know. my reasoning is relatively sound Relatively being the operative word - you have so narrowed the scope that any conclusion drawn from your argument is essentially worthless as soon as that scope is broadened even just a little bit. You are like a man desperately trying to convince others that the real nature of an elephant is a cylindrical piece of saggy, leathery skin - you’ve arrived at the conclusion by fixating on a single kneecap. No one is convinc…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 09:17 PM
3

I wish I could believe you on that.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 09:04 PM
2

Heh. Good answer.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:49 PM
1

Actually that’s incorrect … No, it isn’t. Your idea is very straightforward, but as I’ve already pointed out it’s irrelevant. The voter and the voter alone has the right to determine what constitutes a ‘good’ reason for casting his or her vote for person X, person Y or indeed for no one at all by opting not to vote. You have absolutely no justification for declaring that the only qualification for suffrage is some kind of technical knowledge of politics as you said in your earlier message, or he…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:44 PM
4

(a) A wee bit lacking on sources for all their "factual" statements. No shit! “It might surprise you” says the famously unbiased unofficial Queen of Scottish Mediaratti, Kirsty Wark … I suspect it fucking will, love "It might surprise you, but the first computer programmer, the origins of the Internet, the pioneers of the film industry, the founder of the environmental movement, and the world’s foremost economists. All women.” OK, so they can have "the world’s foremost economists”, but only beca…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:34 PM
1

i ask you to explain to me, how the average person has the required level of knowledge on politics to make informed decisions about who should run state? It’s not necessary to explain this to you because the question is entirely irrelevant. It is a very narrow and parochial understanding of knowledge which becomes apparent if you reverse the question: How can any one individual, or small group of select individuals, have the required knowledge of the populace to make informed decisions about how…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 02:33 PM
1

Thanks for your perspective. … law is entirely based on evidence … Well, no doubt, but even you must surely be aware of the complexities surrounding consent, especially in a case such as Adam Leheup’s, for example. Yes, the jury acquitted him but given the seriousness of the charge and the bizarre way in which he was discovered - climbing out of the alleged victim’s balcony, using scaffolding to swing down to street level - he was stopped by the police. i hold the view that democracies are no mo…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 01:27 PM
1

Well, like I say I’m sure you’re right.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 01:16 PM
1

Oh, I’m sure you’re right - but it’s just with all the high profile changes in the way sex crimes are dealt with in particular, I was just a bit surprised was all.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 01:01 PM
18

Why is anyone and everyone related to Sociology such an unspeakable douche? They’re supposed to be experts in society but they always consistently turn out to be fucking clueless dogmatists. The only special thing about this guy is that he must be that magical 1 in 44 who isn’t a full-time social justice warrior.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 12:53 PM
1

That makes sense, I guess.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 12:44 PM
1

Criminal Justice is also an area that is pretty safe from feminism. Is that true? What about Critical Legal Theory and law surrounding rape and other sexual offences?
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:14 AM
-3

I am not a troll post or a joker. And I’m not the Wizard of fucking Oz! I guess that makes us even.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:30 PM
2

So the machines have led to in my experience stay at home moms to have much more free time Sure, that’s true … but haven’t the numbers of stay-at-home moms dropped drastically since the 70s (and because of labour-saving devices)?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:28 PM
1

Oh, I see. Does that count as chivalry? I’m not sure it does myself, but ...
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:24 PM
1

Eh? What?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:22 PM
1

Two points: 1 Sorry to burst your bubble there matey, but those aren't my tinfoil ravings - they’re the tinfoil ravings at the heart of Feminism. Don’t believe me? Then tell me which part of that bat-shitness I’ve outlined there is not an idea that has been expressed either explicitly or implicitly by Feminists? I don’t believe those things - they do. 2 You can call me a fag or a cuck or whatever for saying this - but rape does actually happen - not at the rate or under the same circumstances th…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:29 PM
13

I’m not a Marxist, but technological innovation is the biggest driver of societal change. Think of the hours of labour it would have taken for that woman’s mum to have done all those things (yes, her daughter makes it sound like the mum was on holiday, pottering about in the garden and reading books etc. but there was clearly a lot more going on).
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:27 AM
2

It’s a troll … a particularly inept one at that.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:24 AM
2

What do you mean bait?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:23 AM
1

It’s a completely pointless step.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:44 AM
1

How do you know they’re not? And it you’re idea of activism is fiddling with Google searches can you really be all that surprised?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:31 AM
1

My last message about ragebait was not being heard, and it's really annoying. Oh, the irony. We need more action to be reported. We also need large events to gain support. I tell you what then mate, you go first then, eh?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:16 AM
1

You’re kidding me right? You are OP you did just ‘scream’ at everyone on here in BLOCK FUCKING CAPITALS with a message that floats to the surface of this subreddit as regularly as the leavings from a bowel movement bobs up in the toilet bowl. So what if there is some rage bait on here? How do you know it has no effect? How do you know that people aren’t engaged in other forms of activity that they don’t want or need to report here? If you don’t like the rage-bait, stop reading it - it’s not the …
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:08 AM
2

Go fuck yourself you cunt. Is that clearer for you?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:52 AM
3

That poem is what political indoctrination looks like. Every word she said in there was one you can read in any Feminist textbook or blog. There are 14 year-old girls in North Korea at this very moment reciting paean’s to the Dear Leader in very much the same spirit ...
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:52 AM
1

Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:41 AM
2

Christ, here we go … u/sobriennui and u/CWBECK I am not denying the experience and in fact only recently I wrote the following below. Core Feminists consciously hate men because of what they discovered about the female orgasm. Percentages vary according to reports (and political agendas), but Core Feminists discovered that as many as 1 in 5 women (note that ratio) reported experiencing arousal/natural lubrication and orgasm during rape. Again percentages vary, but at the same time they discovere…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:35 AM
2

Oh you misunderstood me - I am well aware that it’s true, and so are a number of Feminists believe it or or not. One more radical aspect of Patriarchy theory is that all women are by default lesbians and uninterested in men and that all PIV is IPV (by which they mean all sex involving Penis In Vagina is a form of Intimate Partner Violence). The ‘proof’ of this is that if c. 30% of women experience lubrication and even orgasm during a (stranger) rape sexual assault, then the suggestion is that ev…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:26 AM
1

That may well be true, but you’ll need to explain to me where the element of chivalry is in what I’ve just related above because I can’t see it anywhere.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:18 AM
1

There are also cases of women getting wet when being raped … Jesus … Are you writing this from the inside a prison or what?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 11:03 PM
2

Sex offence cases now take up half of all crown court time: Long trials involving mobile phone evidence are straining the criminal justice system This is out of control. And it’s gone out of control in the space of one year: There was a 41% rise in the reportage of sexual offences in the 12 months to last December, and judges say that they form the biggest group of crimes nationally. That statistic about it being "the biggest group of crimes nationally” is going to get a lot of column inches goi…
/r/MensRights07/05/16 10:14 PM
3

What do I think? This is what I think.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 09:22 PM
1

I think you make a good point, though I agree that they’d probably refuse. In the UK at least, a lot of warehouses and factories of the type he’s describing have found ways (technically legal ways that is) of preventing unions from forming.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 09:09 AM
10

Every summer when I was a student, I used to work in a large warehouse where all the jobs were strictly divided down gender lines. Men’s jobs consisted of shifting cartons of up to 15 kilos (a bit over 30 pounds), sometimes as many as 25 kilos over and over all day long. A lot of the guys there had recently come out of the army and so there was a lot of pressure to compete with other teams to do the work faster and better than anyone else (there was no extra pay or bonus for doing that work fast…
/r/MensRights07/05/16 09:06 AM
1

If he’s an agency worker, I’m guessing not.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 08:30 AM
7

Problem is, you really don’t want the government having influence in the universities any more than you want them having undue influence over the legal system. If you let politics dictate laws and the constitution etc. you subvert the foundation of the rule of the law that everyone is subject to that law. If you let politics dictate the content of academic study, you subvert important features of the freedom of expression and ideas and the possibility of dissent (professors in places like Egypt …
/r/MensRights07/05/16 06:40 AM
1

Hmm … I neve realised I could trigger people with diacritics. What are the going to do when they see SÖME HÖT ÜMLAÜT ÄCTIÖN IN BÖLD?
/r/MensRights06/05/16 09:10 PM
20

Governments turn to experts, the experts come from the universities, the universities look to the relevant faculty and if the faculty is in more or less any social science they end up with a Feminist and/or a Marxist of some kind or other nine times out of ten. That’s why you have this weird set-up where tax money goes from a Conservative (or even a Labour) government to fund some absolutely bat-shit insane anarcho-anti-Capitalist revolutionary etc. etc. I exaggerate for effect, but probably not…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 08:35 PM
1

I like reading books on historical events Oh, I just bet you do.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 06:47 PM
37

From that link: Edit 4: So, apparently the project behind this talk, Documenting digital feminist activism: mapping feminist responses to new media misogyny and rape culture, was in receipt of £109,461 of funding from the British government? Your tax money, Brits. https://archive.is/WinKT
/r/MensRights06/05/16 06:08 PM
1

I’m also a white guy, but I grew up in a very ethnically diverse part of a UK city (about half the kids at my high school were from ethnic backgrounds for example). But regardless, I just had to Google Moose Lodge and shocking as that story is, a Moose Lodge is not part of a university campus community which are the places I was saying were "pretty progressive” and that was kind of my point in a way - there was racism in the 1970s, sure, but was it widespread on university campuses? The home of …
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:41 PM
1

She says she received some hostility from students and profs who thought she was intruding in an exclusive club. I don’t mean this to sound disrespectful to your family, but I wonder how accurate your sister-in-law’s understanding of what went on really was? Please note, I am not trying to invalidate her feelings or anything like that - if she says that, then I believe she believes that. But it’s just … even in the 70s, universities were pretty progressive places already. In fact, in some ways m…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 06:28 AM
2

Probably only British people of a certain age will get this, but if you know the UK and are about that age or older then this bit is absolutely priceless: … the WEP is really just a slightly sassier, slightly younger version (though only slightly) of Mary Whitehouse. Men are rapacious, the media will warp your mind, ‘taking it down’ is the best approach to dodgy commentary — you couldn’t fit a sheet of Rizla between the outlook of the WEP and the censorious fear once promoted by the blue-rinse l…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 09:48 PM
1

Good point and probably correct, but hey, if people are going to get upset by italics then it’s seriously not me that has the problem.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 09:01 PM
1

Sorry, I knew what you meant but it was just as I read it … it really put me in mind of all the psychobabble that is thrown at us - the kind that tries to make men think and act like women and when they don’t they are seen as deficient, faulty or mad.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 03:34 PM
1

With respect that’s very silly advice. There are always going to be people in the world at one time or another who know more than you, who have better ideas than you etc. If you were to never open your mouth for fear or not having studied enough first, you would get nowhere. Better to have some humility about your limits, than be hubristic about your talents.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 03:32 PM
1

That does strike me as being far more likely. If anything, you would imagine that women would be more welcomed than others precisely because they are women. That might lead to mild embarrassment, but other than that … it would hardly be enough to drive women away.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:59 PM
1

TBH I can be retarded at times as well, obviously, and am not that bright. I think it’s more when you put a private joke in a public space and you forget other people will read it at face value.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:10 PM
1

Fair point. Actually, everyone needs to let off steam now and again - better they do it on the Internet than elsewhere. The whole reddit points system is Gamification of self-esteem for some people anyway ...
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:09 PM
19

How in the name of all that is holy and miraculous can they write this without any sense of self-awareness? Every mother lives for those small, joyful moments when her child masters something new - a book once too challenging, the telling of a joke previously stumbled over, a food devoured that had formerly been rejected. For it's in the gentle minutiae of a little one's life that you really see their budding personality grow. Imagine, then, the agonising pain of being privy to your child's life…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:45 PM
0

You muh, muh, make me happy
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:38 PM
2

I basically agree - I was born in the 70s and even by the time I started school in the 80s there was no discouragement to women to do science and for that matter there was no distinction between genders that I ever recall when it came to academic ability. Whatever Tyson experienced I really don’t think it’s applicable now or even over the last 20 years or more.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:05 PM
-1

Ah, so it’s Francophobia combined with an inability to spot sarcasm? Good-oh!
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:02 PM
1

Being sensitive is great for a man's health I’m not so sure about that one ; - )
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:02 PM
3

I pretty much agree with all of that.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:01 PM
1

Even though it's got a .org domain name, just some of the stuff on their actual site ... I mean this: Maybe you, too, know a handsome upwardly mobile upper-middle class cis dude who is well intentioned and super progressive. We’re happy go buy him a locally brewed craft beer and tell him to take a step back instead. And this: Why do you hate America ? Shut up, comrade. You are not the hero that Gotham needs. And the transcript of the interview with co-founder Jack Teter has this: Teter: Yeah. Th…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 06:03 AM
3

You said a mouthful brother
/r/MensRights05/05/16 03:11 AM
-4

Thanks butt_sex_man!
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:12 AM
1

The first paragraph alone is inflammatory enough ... Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:06 AM
4

Stop trying to tell men to be women. We aren't women, nor will we ever be. That
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:01 AM
2

But it isn't what they want. It sometimes feels to me like we're undergoing a society-wide communal shit test on a national scale and the way to pass it is to endure and ignore.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:00 AM
7

I literally cannot tell if this is satire. The Can You Not PAC plans to discourage straight white men from running for office in Colorado's diverse districts. The hope is that will clear the lane from female, minority and LGBTQ candidates. In the land of the morons, Poe's Law is King. Who are these fucking assholes and just how far up their own fundaments have they disappeared to be this retarded?
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:09 AM
-24

Just ... satisfy my curiosity for a moment - just what is it that is so offensive about that comment that begins Mais oui, bien sûr!? I mean ... that one's minus 56 whereas the top one, which is also my comment, is plus 218.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:04 AM
-1

Funnily enough, yes. I really had no idea I had to put an '/s' after that for it be clear. I'm kind of curious now to know just how observant the gentleman are that have downvoted that message to - 56 but who have also upvoted the original message to + 218.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:02 AM
3

That idea was a resounding success for the British Labour party at the last election [/s] - see this 'Woman to Woman' pink bus. It was widely derided and rightly hated. 6oodfella's take on it is here.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 09:18 PM
4

My claim? Oh, no, no - click on the link and read the first line: Amy Schumer is inciting 4 million people to go after a guy who snagged photos and video of her without her approval -- and he says those fans are threatening his life.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 09:10 PM
-58

Au contraire, monsieur! Au contraire
/r/MensRights04/05/16 08:36 PM
0

Figures!
/r/MensRights04/05/16 07:29 PM
2

Oh, I see - that explains that then, ta.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 07:03 PM
0

It was never on it. I don’t know a lot about the subject generally, but unless this is fake, this SPLC March 01 2012 page suggests otherwise. Under the heading MISOGYNY: THE SITES It says: Reddit: Mens Rights A “subreddit” of the user-generated news site Reddit, this forum describes itself as a “place for people who feel that men are currently being disadvantaged by society.” While it presents itself as a home for men seeking equality, it is notable for the anger it shows toward any program desi…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 06:49 PM
-87

Only patriarchy is able to do this! Mais oui, bien sûr! Imagine the fiendishness of sock-puppeting four million Amy Schumer fans 1 just so that they can discredit Amy Schumer and her four million fans as death-threat sending haters! 1 Of course, anywhere between 50% and 80% of those 4 million might be fake or inactive …
/r/MensRights04/05/16 06:45 PM
0

Unless my eyes are deceiving me, it seems that Men’s Rights have have actually been removed from the Southern Poverty Law Center’s up-to-date list of extremist hate groups - can that be right?
/r/MensRights04/05/16 05:58 PM
329

Brewer, who is black, claims he's been called the n-word -- and had a fan say, "Shoot him in the face." Another told Amy, "If we see him we will jump him for you" ... and he claims another threatened to burn him and his wife and daughter. Why I’m simply shocked, I tell you, simply shocked that an army of Amy Schumer fans would send edit death threats.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:56 PM
1

From Katherine Cross’ page … Jesus … if only we could find a way to produce energy from that level of cognitive dissonance, we could say goodbye to oil and gas forever! I’m serious - how can that woman demand the eradication of "fear, hatred, and exploitation of sex workers” while at exactly the same fucking time complain that too many men treat women as objects or as she has it treat them as: "A subservient female assistant who never says no to your sexual advances, even if it’s not an actual p…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:50 PM
7

As Laurie Penny explained in a recent article, … You know things are going to head South with incredible rapidity the moment you see Laurie Penny’s name being quoted approvingly. … the popularity of feminine-gendered AI makes sense in a world where women still aren’t seen as fully human. I see I was not to be disappointed. … the rise of the service economy, which relies on emotional labor that’s performed by women. OK, I’m done. Edit 1 OK, I lied - I had to read it to the end. Just who are these…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 06:16 AM
1

You read Seventeen?
/r/MensRights04/05/16 05:32 AM
3

In the UK, "Women are much less likely to be involved in a drink drive accident, as drivers, than men.”. Men are about 75% of all drink driving casualties. DUI arrests in the US are 77.6% male, apparently.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:19 PM
1

Well, yes … hence my comment "Slightly let down by the existence of taxis of course …"
/r/MensRights03/05/16 12:12 PM
1

… it'd be nice if, at least once in a while, they showed a woman in the PSAs … Well, good point. Even if men are the majority, that still leaves a potentially complacent 1 in 5 reckless women drivers. It’s not like there’s no women who have never been given a speeding ticket for instance.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 09:28 AM
1

Interesting indeed. Slightly let down by the existence of taxis of course … It acknowledges that women can be assholes … I think the premise is interesting - that he isn’t drink-driving because he’s irresponsible so much as he’s being pushed into it by someone else (in this case his SO, but the same could apply to e.g. teenage daughter stranded somewhere late at night and he doesn’t want her walking home on her own).
/r/MensRights03/05/16 09:25 AM
2

I don’t think it can be labelled as sexist if men make 75-80% of all DUI arrests. Regarding prevention ads though, this one from the UK is interesting
/r/MensRights03/05/16 07:45 AM
1

I was being slightly sarcastic there, but in any case why would men feel “threatened” if that were the case?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 06:10 AM
3

You can't question feminist orthodoxy; if you do, you are a misogynist, patriarch, rape-apologist, etc. I see the pay gap is alive and well: Latham was asked by Sunrise co-host Angela Cox if he thought men felt threatened now that women today are educated and better off financially. I mean, which is it? They earn 23c less for every dollar a man earns or they are "better off financially”?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:00 AM
2

It's because those people would absolutely massacre her. My feeling is the same - the kind of obfuscation she contrives through heavy reference to her credentials (see the way she has The Skeptic Feminist introduce her as opposed to how they introduce Sargon - that was deliberately designed to belittle him - a bit like one boxer saying to another ‘By the way, you’re wife’s been fucking your manager behind your back’ literally a minute before the bell goes). Kristi was super slimy during the whol…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 06:23 AM
1

Pink is for girls in a "boys who use it or wear it will get teased" way that blue just isn't. Yeah, I guess a tom-boy girl is perhaps a bit more widely accepted than a … a … ? whatever the reverse of a tom-boy is … in fact, come to think of it I’m not even sure there is one, is there? I guess ‘delicate’ maybe? Either way, try finding a particular toy for many girls and coming home with the blue rather than the pink version some time and see what happens … It's about wanting 'the best' for your k…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 09:05 PM
2

… they don't have to make the toy kitchen all pink. No, that’s true, they don’t have to make them pink. If they make it a more neutral color like blue or yellow or green, … How is blue neutral? I’d say for probably getting on for a 100 years or so now, blue has been for boys, pink for girls. Yellow depends on the shade, but with children I think it leans more towards girls than boys, just as green probably leans more towards boys than girls. White … grey … brown … orange … - I’d go for those for…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 08:08 PM
2

When I was a kid… Which was when if I may be so bold? Here’s a 1977 advert for Matey’s bubble bath - This being the 70s, the sell was it would clean the bath at the same time as the kids - I mean fuck knows what chemicals were thrown in there along with the soap, but hey, this was for boys! Definitely for boys - there’s the implication that a real boy isn’t a real boy unless he’s wearing a layer of grime and dirt several inches thick before he gets in the bath; there’s the more overt design of t…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 07:52 PM
2

Video seems to have been removed.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 04:20 PM
6

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks.” Working that hard to convince someone is always terribly unconvincing.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 04:19 PM
2

The first time I heard of him was he got a mention in a comment thread under a Guardian article about Gamer Gate - the first video of his I saw was this one (the first 5 seconds of which still makes me laugh!). Something has been plaguing me for ages - why has Kristi in particular, a post-doc researcher in sociology, got such a hard-on for Sargon? I mean, why him in particular if it’s anti-Feminism that upsets her? Why not Karen Straughan or TL;DR? Then it struck me - I think they’ve been lookin…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 08:38 AM
1

But government will censor your thoughts too. Do you know this? Sen vord is thrall and thocht is fre : Keip veill thy tonge I coinsell the (Since word is enthrallment and thought is freedom : keep well thy tongue I counsel thee)
/r/MensRights01/05/16 07:53 AM
2

You’re right, but oh, come on this is absolutely hilarious!
/r/MensRights01/05/16 07:02 AM
5

Maybe I’m being thick, but I’m not quite sure what the relevance is of this to the subreddit. Also, a second point is that the findings miss out some key details: Is this first marriages (for both partners) only, or second, third, n marriages as well? At what age were these marriages taking place? Two divorcees marrying one another who are both aged 42, say, are going to make a difference to the likely longevity of that second marriage compared to a 23 year-old guy marrying an 18 year-old girl s…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 06:39 AM
9

“We’re serious about making sure we’re alive to changing attitudes and behaviours,” [Chief Executive of the ASA, Guy Parker] said, according to the release. You have to love the grammar of that changing attitudes and behaviours there - sure it can be read to mean ‘responding to changes in the people’, but in the context of this you can also read it as ‘we’re happy to force changes on other people' (whether they like it or not). And oh look here: “That’s why we’ve already been taking action to ba…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 06:18 AM
1

Yeah, it’s a shame because her arguments weren’t particularly strong I didn’t think, but she came across as the more focussed, prepared, coherent and confident -like lots of people have said (me included), I think he’s much better in discussions and interviews (also, he looked a bit hungover to me)
/r/MensRights01/05/16 05:52 AM
1

Understand now.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 09:18 PM
8

Primarily, it’s an insult intended to mock and demean men for the entertainment of people who like that kind of thing (example here) But the insult itself is often politically motivated and used to endorse arguments such as having 50% of women in executive boardrooms and so on e.g. here: If we want to help women, we need to help men find all those inner joys of housework that anti-feminists have been celebrating for decades -- or at least get us to do our share. Basically, he’s saying that men h…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 08:52 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights30/04/16 08:32 PM
3

Even Sargon agrees it didn’t go so well …
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:44 PM
2

Equivalent to false accusations of other similarly violent crimes.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:29 PM
2

Lane faked a pregnancy for months before luring Ms Wilkins, 28, to her apartment by creating a Craigslist ad for maternity clothes. Lane hit Ms Wilkins over the head with a lava lamp and stabbed her in the neck with the broken glass. She then cut Ms Wilkin’s abdomen, removed the unborn baby and left the victim for dead. This is absolutely horrific - note that it was planned and premeditated. In 2002, Lane’s 19-month-old son drowned in what investigators decided was an accident. Relatives who spo…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:27 PM
1

I’ll let the man himself explain it in his own words.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:11 PM
3

"The victim, an 11-year-old male was with his father in the vicinity of Bow Bridge and West 74th Street, when the child's father approached a 50-year-old male and offered his son for a sex act in exchange for an undetermined amount of money. This is heinous and does highlight a seemingly often overlooked form of prostitution … however, the one issue here is that many Feminists will use just such a story of evidence that men are the problem in society and that it is uniquely men that commit acts …
/r/MensRights30/04/16 03:36 PM
10

The short version is that he got his ass kicked.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 03:07 PM
2

But today, wage gap took center stage. It would be helpful to say what the content of these points actually are. I don't want to be a dick! Then don’t - pick your battles.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 09:12 AM
1

… you can prevent the pregnancy. Making something like that part of the healthcare system is possible today. (not practical) We have the technology, for sure, but (as you acknowledge with not practical) that level of control over an individual’s behaviour is neither possible nor desirable ...
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:29 PM
2

Hannah, Karen, Alison and Brian make a really excellent point in yesterday’s HBR livestream. Go to about 2:14:18 on the time code and listen to the points, starting with Hannah (picking up from something Karen and Brian had been saying), and listen through to about 2:22:20 1 They’re talking about second wave Feminist Susan Brownmiller’s ‘2%’ claim on the rate of false rape allegations. As Hannah puts it (at c. 2:18:35), this constant regurgitation of Brownmiller’s poorly conducted ‘research’: Es…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:04 AM
1

Good point! With defence like that, perhaps that explains why Sanders and only Sanders got fined after all ...
/r/MensRights29/04/16 10:41 AM
2

Ah, sorry! I’ve just watched that video trailer and even so I never realised that was Montreal! Doh! There probably is a PC vibe there then, but not at all the one I’d understood from showing him dictating Balzac and stuff to the kids. EDIT: Man! What an ass, I am! Just watched the trailer again - sure enough, there’s the crown symbol on the wall in the court and the girl at the end even calls Montreal out by name … tsk tsk
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:38 AM
2

That looks to be a fantastic recommendation with Monsieur Lazhar. There’s a clear post-colonialist studies influence by the look of it (i.e. man escapes Algeria as a consequence of terroristic civil war - the violent legacy of French Imperialism; arrives in France to discover he knows more about France and French culture as a consequence of the mission civilisatrice than the French themselves do etc.). But it still looks very cool. If you like that, you should read E. R. Braithwaite's To Sir, Wi…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:35 AM
3

Not so keen on the explanations given under the section Why Don't Men Teach? - basically, it seemed to be arguing that women’s work in elementary schools is undervalued and men don’t value women therefore edit [they] don’t become elementary school teachers because they edit [don’t] value the job and/or edit [they consider that] their ‘masculinity is too fragile’ and so they avoid joining a ‘girly’ profession. It also makes the sexist, Feminist argument that: Increasing the number of male teacher…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:13 AM
1

… we take a note from the Chinese government … I'm not saying that you have no say… but … OK, I admit I did not expect you to say that! I can imagine a number of technical and practical issues with that proposal, but it’s a very interesting idea. For instance, I’m not sure how well it would work without some incentives or disincentives to persuade people to accept the thing you’ve been told "that you have an aptitude for”; there’s also a potential problem with pushy parents, but still it’s an in…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 09:31 PM
2

Also look up the definition of gender: "the state of being male or female”. Hey! It’s in the dictionary, so it must be true …
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:29 PM
1

But the fact that we have people on welfare and low incomes is part of the problem. Just so: there are a multitude of reasons to oppose so-called social justice movements (including Feminism), but one of them is that all their actions consistently achieve the opposite of whatever they claim to set out to do. 'Social justice’ as they envision it is nothing if not expensive which in turn means higher taxation and that in turn means bigger government and therefore more multimillion dollar contracts…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:10 PM
5

Yes, all of that and yes it is.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:23 PM
1

Check this out from Ceara McCord if you like that.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:03 PM
1

Yup... perfectly okay with Detroit. OK, fair enough. It was just because you’d specifically said "Cities need to be run like a successful business.” rather than just “like a business" Having a government that is actually accountable to the people that make society work. We don’t have that system in place, now? However imperfect it might seem, that is pretty much the model in operation in most western countries (certainly English-speaking ones) and has been for some time. We don't have to worry a…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:59 PM
1

I’ve thought a great deal about the kind of arguments you’re presenting here as for a while I flirted with (and am still in many ways attracted to) some of the stronger interpretations of Libertarianism. However, ultimately, I came to the conclusion that it couldn’t work and ultimately we benefit from governments and the nation state (so long as they are legitimately democratic!). I could say so much about this whole area, but anyway I’ve tried to narrow it down to just a few quick points. The e…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:54 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:43 PM
15

Yes, me! The woman had initially faced the same charge and had denied the offence. Defence agent Les Green initially expressed his surprise at the Crown’s decision. He said: “To coin an old phrase it takes two to tango.” As [Sanders] was leaving court [after being fined £250/$365 USD] he branded the crown’s decision not to call his co-accused’s case as “unfair”. What the fuck?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:42 PM
1

Except … Ah, well, these are all good points, but this is a different conversation from the one we began with when you said: Society is built and run by the men doing those shitty jobs. And I responded: that particular point is true of anyone in that labour class Which I still stand by - because my argument was about the necessity and usefulness of those jobs to a well-ordered and functioning society. What I never intended to do was get into an argument about who should pay for those functions o…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:53 PM
1

... If all the nannies stopped working, people would have to look after their own children.. society wouldn't stop functioning.... same with domestic cleaners, etc…. I get your point, but childcare is not a luxury by any stretch of the imagination - very young children who are left unattended regularly injure themselves or even die, older children who are uncared for become disruptive, lack emotional as well as academic intelligence and can eventually drift into delinquency and worse. A house ha…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 12:58 PM
1

Her big policy Really? Do you have a link to that as I’d genuinely not heard that?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 12:28 PM
1

It’s never justifiable to send rape or death threats - but I get the wider point. There is something profoundly wrong with someone such as Jessica Valenti if she were to believe that a good proportion of her own headlines and articles aren’t provocative vehicles for producing exactly the kind of rage-bait she regularly receives. I mean look at these, all taken from real articles published in The Guardian: Gender inequality is a problem men created (28 September 2015) or Trump thinks immigrants a…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:32 AM
3

it's going to be illegal to disagree with a woman Feminist Apart from that one minor correction, absolutely spot on: Cooper called for online threats, harassment and stalking to be included in the Crime Survey for England and Wales ... Stalking is already a crime and, I think, one that's fairly easy to prove. Threats you would think would be easy to recognise but Jezebel once ran a headline that ran 'Woman Gets Death Threats for Tweeting About Disliking A Dude's Shirt' (13 November 2014) then - …
/r/MensRights28/04/16 10:19 AM
1

Thanks - I think it’s important when reading OP's message above to know how that sorry episode concluded.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:12 AM
2

Yes, also the context for this particular comment (from ‘End sexism now’ to ‘Rebecca’), I think, comes from this 2015 discussion on the Slymepit (you might have to scroll down a bit, but it’s quick to find).
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:36 AM
3

Exactly how long is the battle-axe at the end supposed to have been in that stall for? How did the young bird not manage to smell her before she heard the flush go? Jeez, that must have been some serious log-rolling right there.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:48 AM
0

Tit
/r/MensRights27/04/16 09:27 PM
0

Oh, well, there you go then - can’t dispute overwhelming counter evidence like that.
/r/MGTOW27/04/16 08:49 PM
1

I'm willing to assume in both cases the woman didn't earn all the money herself. Even if she did, I still think that if you were to line up all the men who gained wealth through marriage - starting with the Prophet Mohammed (no really) - and all the women and carried both those lines up on up to the present day, you’d still find that the line of women was way, way longer than the line of men.
/r/MGTOW27/04/16 08:48 PM
1

Interesting (and true) point - although of course that particular point is true of anyone in that labour class (nannies, child carers, domestic cleaners etc.)
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:44 PM
1

Amy Schumer No, shit, really? I thought she was just some regular Jane who got lucky on the comedy circuit ...
/r/MGTOW27/04/16 08:42 PM
1

because Trump was given 1 million dollars as an inheritance means he isn't self made is ridiculous. He turned it into billions! I’m not disputing that, I’m simply pointing out that his initial wealth at least was inherited. That point is beyond question - it was not intended to be a slur on his achievements as an adult, whatever people know or believe those to be.
/r/MGTOW27/04/16 08:42 PM
3

Thanks for sharing! Do come again, won’t you?
/r/MGTOW27/04/16 08:40 PM
2

Is the exception or the rule, though?
/r/MGTOW27/04/16 01:44 PM
1

if feminists were actually concerned with equal representation in work places... why don't we see them beating down the doors to force garbage collection/ mining/ sewer work companies to hire more women? It’s an old question, but a good one and one that I’ve personally never heard any Feminist or their sympathisers have ever attempted to answer. I imagine that because they see their mission as a cultural revolution, the main reason why "we [don’t] see them beating down the doors” to the kinds of…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 01:30 PM
1

Oh, cheers, that makes sense.
/r/MGTOW27/04/16 10:46 AM
1

I mean't in the grand scheme of things … Oh, OK. … how you suggest that there is no need to have expect a 50/50 gender ratio in all areas of social and professional life … There may be some instances where it might be deemed desirable or even necessary to balance out the genders - for instance, nursery.kindergarten and primary/elementary school teachers are overwhelmingly (and often exclusively) women. Now, I have no issue with that in and of itself except for the fact that in certain (usually p…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 10:46 AM
2

Well, I suppose to be fair the article doesn’t say how many men on the list got a leg up from an inheritance or a privileged background i.e. George W. Bush or Donald Trump. But I think we can be pretty sure that marrying into wealth doesn’t figure high on the male version of that list.
/r/MGTOW27/04/16 10:11 AM
1

so you think it is absurd that every position having the same proportions of men and women … Essentially, yes - people who ask question such as 'Why are there only 21 female CEOs in the Fortune 500?’ are making the assumption that there should be more. How many more should that be? Consensus among many Feminists and their supporters seems to be that it ought to be as close to 50% (or 51%) on the grounds that the general population is 50% (or 51%) women. But as I explained (at some length!), ther…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:53 AM
3

[Devil's Advocate] Why are there only 21 female CEOs in the Fortune 500? The unstated premise to that question is the assumption that this is evidence of a problem - but what problem? Many Feminists and their supporters would argue that the problem is discrimination against women as women and this is the proof of that discrimination. But this claim is based on another (usually) unstated premise - that the only proof that such people will accept that the alleged discrimination no longer exists wi…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:03 AM
9

TL;DR The majority of Britain’s female billionaires either inherited their fortunes or acquired them through marriages—though there is one standout who made her own way. Also, bizarrely, Lebanese-heritage Mexican-born Hollywood actress Salma Hayek is listed as British. Who knew?
/r/MGTOW27/04/16 06:14 AM
4

They're just outright lying now, not even trying to base things on reality. It’s far more insidious than that though, isn’t it? Lying implies they are presenting information they know to be false as true - but I’m not sure that’s true, they really believe what they’re saying, which is even more disturbing than if they were simply dissembling charlatans. You can see it in the comment thread (which for some reason is not yet disabled as all the others are) e.g. Kay Wesley 1 month ago The level of …
/r/MensRights27/04/16 05:38 AM
1

If it helps any, I hate that video, fake or not, but not sure what you mean by “this sort of thing”.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 05:04 AM
1

Let’s see … brand new account … quirky syntax … obvious bait … Now, what does that remind me of?
/r/MensRights27/04/16 03:11 AM
3

Heh : - ) You, you, you're good you! [not s]
/r/MensRights27/04/16 03:06 AM
13

From the keyboard of Jess Phillips MP: A child should always be put first. A child should never be used as a weapon. Sorry, that just made my irony meter go into fucking meltdown.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 07:58 PM
4

I disagree. She is lying. I was not being entirely serious (hence "lazy, sloppy, incompetent, blinded by prejudiced … or just plain dumb as a bucket of rocks”). You may be completely right and it’s not at all impossible that she is in fact lying, as you say, but on the other hand, the astonishing success of a lot of these ideas to spread and persist in spreading is due to the fact that so many people like her fervently believe what they are saying is true. I think there is a very good chance she…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 11:53 AM
5

This doesn’t necessarily prove she was a liar. She could of course just be lazy, sloppy, incompetent, blinded by prejudiced … or just plain dumb as a bucket of rocks. I’m thinking the last of those, but the point is she may not be aware that she is lying. Her 2-8% could very easily have come from an article first published 30 July 2015 by Jezebel by Donna Zuckerberg called 'He Said, She Said: The Mythical History of the False Rape Allegation’ (and, no, I’m not linking to that shithole, but there…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 05:41 AM
1

She’s back. Is that not the very definition of ad hominem? No, it isn’t. I’m not swearing at you as a diversionary strategy in order to persuade a disinterested third party that you are the kind of person whose arguments cannot be trusted because you are a morally corrupt deviant, a weakling, and so on - that’s how ad hominems are actually used. Flipping off a driver who has just dangerously undertaken you by coming up fast on the inside lane is not an ad hominem - it’s an insult intended to let…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 01:37 PM
1

Always amusing to watch the desperate with nothing valid behind their argument result to attacking the person. Ooh, put the handbag down dearie! … ad hominem logical phalacy which makes your third It’s not that you can’t spell fallacy - that might have been a pun - but it’s that like a shocking number of assholes on the Internet you have absolutely no idea what their proper function is how to apply them properly. I am sick to fucking death of pricks who think there is any serious intellectual me…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 12:53 PM
0

Name calling is unproductive. It’s kind of funny though.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 05:55 AM
2

people are upset now because they're being indoctrinated into being upset. That. Yes.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 05:54 AM
1

Men and women are different, biologically and culturally. Biologically, certainly, but culturally? From a certain point of view, yes OK, a case can be made for a degree of difference - but let's not exaggerate. The cultural difference between men and women is nuanced, not vastly different, And besides, the specific subject in this case is ‘gender equality’ - on that specific subject, there is absolutely no reason why a discussion is invalidated by having a panel of all men. Read some testimonial…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 10:20 PM
1

It comes off to me as being very satirical and not actually get her kicked off youtube. That's impossible to do with a goal of just 200 signatures. Meh. Sorry, better ways of doing it IMO.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:41 PM
1

Depends on how strong your stomach is ; - ) More seriously, no, but if you are of a volatile disposition be in a place where you are unlikely to put your boot through the monitor in a fit of anger.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:34 PM
2

I see where you’re coming from, but I think there are better ways to make the same point.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:33 PM
1

On what grounds?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:32 PM
2

Nor can I - well said.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:32 PM
1

Yes - and it’s a big fat fucking ‘No’ to this suggestion from me at least.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:31 PM
1

Just be thankful you don’t know.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:30 PM
1

Agree.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:30 PM
0

Agree.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:30 PM
12

Jesus, she said that? Oh, man I missed that one.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:19 PM
1

There's a difference between capable and ideal. Yes men could theorize about what goes on inside a womens head … Sorry to interrupt you there - but what makes you think that any single individual woman would be any better at “theoriz[ing] about what goes on inside a womens head …” than any other human being? Does a human being with a penis make you understand the problem of other human beings with penises better than anyone else? I think not. So why would having a vagina make one particular woma…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:18 PM
-2

There’s a difference?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:10 PM
18

Well, if she’s not talking about a nanny it’s a frigging weird way to talk about your mum … I mean, who the fuck says "The woman who raised me for 17 years was technically an illegal immigrant” rather than “My mum/mom’s Latin American?!?"
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:10 PM
1

Certainly looks that way ...
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:08 PM
1

I do indeed know Withnail and I
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:08 PM
3

I’m thinking pretty much … I mean I can’t be sure … but it does seem highly probable.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:06 PM
50

This seems apt: Every age has its peculiar folly: Some scheme, project, or fantasy into which it plunges, spurred on by the love of gain, the necessity of excitement, or the force of imitation. Charles Mackay Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
/r/MensRights24/04/16 12:40 PM
129

Man: “If you really want to fight a patriarchy, and you really want to fight oppression, you need to go to the Middle East because they need you there." Same white chick on the left: “ OK, but at that same time, [becomes shrill and emotional] my two best friends have been raped, and every day when I walk to the school [inaudible] I’m told [inaudible] because these men want to tell me what my body is … No it’s not OK! [ … ]” And a bit later: "I’m 17 years old and on the walk to school - every day…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 12:39 PM
225

"The woman who raised me for 17 years was technically an illegal immigrant” Is the white chick on the left fighting for the right for upper middle class families to pay exploitation wages to illegal migrant workers or … what exactly?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 12:27 PM
3

legitimate items of discussion for such a panel. Why shouldn’t men be capable of discussing issues of equality without women being present? Ideas and knowledge aren’t biologically inherited or determined. There are many male obstetricians with vast and valuable knowledge of pregnancy and childbirth despite not having the necessary equipment to ever be mothers or give birth themselves. A male MP is just as capable (or not) of representing women constituents as he is male ones. The idea that we mu…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:59 AM
0

Basically the courts are saying that it's biologically impossible for a woman who gave birth to a child to in fact do it harm unless mentally incapacitated? But men are violent so they really do hate their kids when bad things happen? As far as I’m aware at least, mitigating circumstances are generally taken into account regarding any crime regardless of gender. For instance, many courts will avoid trying to give juveniles and young men prison sentences for first offences1 because rates of recid…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:50 AM
1

Yes, that’s true (and is explained in 6oodfella’s video that I linked to). But the comparison I was trying to make (perhaps not completely clearly which is my fault) was that back when Evans was released from jail, he was blocked from going back to Sheffield United by people who felt at that time that not only should her serve a custodial sentence but prevented from ever working again. Ramkissoon was suspended for a number of months - rightly so - and was hauled in front of TV cameras to make lo…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:28 AM
1

Heh ; - ) No, apparently it was a drip with, I think, some kind of sugar solution in, but I might be misremembering that detail.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:24 AM
2

Fair point.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:23 AM
2

I’d not remembered her kneeing him in the groin, so that does change things a bit. You make a good point about break-ups and sick parents being far from unusual situations too. It just seems such a waste of all those years of training and for someone not that old - I mean, if she’d been in her 30s and 40s then I would be much harsher than I’m being now. I guess you’re right overall though.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:22 AM
2

These are all valid points you’re making and I do understand - I’m just trying to say that I think it’s a real shame that, for example, she could “stai[n] the resumes of the other residents” from this one episode. I’ve never been to Australia, but they have a thing over there called giving someone "a fair go”. In short, it doesn’t let people off the hook for misdemeanours, but it doesn’t cast them into the wilderness for a fuck up either. She’d already been suspended for a number of months as we…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:03 AM
1

I think you make a compelling point, but are you so certain that a man in the same position would have been charged? I’m writing from the UK where our justice is system is notoriously lenient (and literally lenient to a fault). Drunken brawling in city centres, involving women as well as men and often much worse than what Ramkissoon got up to, is a routine weekend night out for a lot of people over here. Very often, police will simply move into break up a fight and maybe give someone a caution, …
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:52 AM
3

It's not about her. She's a political football. That’s what concerns me about it though - Ched Evans was being made an example of - the Feminists and their supporters who went out of their way to demand that he never work again were using him as "a political football” and making it about the issue of “rape” and the law for all women, not just about Evans only. That level of vindictiveness is the road Steph Guthrie took and it’s not one I’m content to go down.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:25 AM
17

she will lie, she will try to get out of it From the report: When investigators found Lacey at the scene, covered in blood, she told them a man had come out of the woods and held a knife to her, then stabbed her boyfriend, according to the criminal complaint filed in court.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:20 AM
12

This part. Notice the reference to his size - he’s a man-mountain at 6’6”. Being that height alone is usually enough to get claims of IPV from a female partner derided, dismissed or both. “She gets drunk and mad and starts hitting me. And I’m a big guy,” he said. At 6 foot 6 inches, he has a full foot on Lacey. He thought he could take it. So even when Lacey attacked him over dinner on Valentine’s Day, lunging across the table to bite his nose and taking off a chunk in the process, Peterson said…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:18 AM
3

Ah, so it’s not about punishing her then really, but CYA on the part of the hospital? That makes far more sense now. And yes, I acknowledge that she was very aggressive.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:13 AM
1

… part of being an adult is knowing your limit with alcohol I agree but then young people are notorious for trying to determine where that limit is and testing it quite vigorously. Also, I have a good friend from school who became a doctor … I used to hang out with him and his mates sometimes and while no, they never assaulted any taxi drivers they got up to plenty of other drunken hi-jinx. They even concocted some kind of super-powered hangover cure so they could function in the hospital after …
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:10 AM
1

On top of assault, she should get littering. Jesus, it’s Judge Dredd!
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:01 AM
1

… the business of a hospital is patient care....her presence impedes their mission If they had to do that to every medical student who ever got drunk, there would be no doctors left in the hospital. She behaved absolutely shittily, yes - when drunk on a night out. How is this related to patient care? I’m just not seeing it.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 04:54 AM
1

He was held accountable regardless. You're arguing she not be. Not quite, but that’s my fault for not being clear enough - the comparison I’m drawing is that after Evans was released from prison on parole, he was due to return to professional football - but it never happened. Why? Because there was outrage from Feminists, who got together a petition which stated: “To even consider reinstating him as a player is a deep insult to the woman who was raped and to all women like her who have suffered …
/r/MensRights24/04/16 04:50 AM
2

She's a liability with a history of public violence … She's a headache … They don't have time for this bullshit, there's work to be done. OK, so basically and unequivocally, you are quite happy to see her never work again anywhere ever?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 04:32 AM
-2

In televised media interviews after the incident, Ramkissoon apologized and acknowledged there was no excuse for her actions. This is the kind of comment that usually ends up with me getting accused of being a feminist, but … … I’m not sure this is such good news - Who, of any of the people reading the comment I’m now writing, has not at some point made a complete asshole of themselves when drunk? I mean, sure, I might not have ever made as big of an asshole as she made herself on that video (at…
/r/MensRights23/04/16 09:05 PM
3

what a good parallel to feminism Need one say more?
/r/MensRights23/04/16 07:38 PM
1

If you can managed to look at Jackson’s mug every time you pay for something, I’m sure you’ll live.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:02 PM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:00 PM
10

Puh ha ha ha - fantastic! Actually, probably Vulvazela ...
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:26 PM
13

That is the worst case outcome, yes, but it’s not so unusual for suspected pedophiles to be assaulted.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:23 PM
52

Just cause your "venting" doesn't give you the right to say whatever you want. You got that right: "An accusation of pedophilic behaviour must be the single most effective means of destroying a teacher's reputation and career, not to mention the devastating effect on their life and individual dignity. He now faces the challenge of repairing the damage Ms. Van Nes has caused, if that is even possible at this point.” Also job and reputation may be the least of your worries if someone gets into the…
/r/MensRights23/04/16 11:56 AM
2

My question was directed more towards her policies … Yes, I realised that, but I think her policies such as they are strategic and aimed at applying pressure on candidates more likely to win, especially Khan. As policies in and of themselves … they’re not actually hugely different to what’s on offered by other parties: childcare support, more flexible working, a clampdown on sexual violence and more support for (female) victims of IPV. If anything, what Walker’s policies demonstrate is just how …
/r/MensRights23/04/16 11:50 AM
5

Mainly that she’s handing Zac Goldsmith the keys to London. The only thing the WEP can possibly achieve, if anything at all, is to split the Labour vote even more than it has been already by the Greens (Siân Berry), Respect (George Galloway) and UKIP (Peter Whittle). Probably it’ll take a few votes away from the Lib Dems (haven’t a clue and don’t care) as well, but as they’re dead as a party they barely count any more than the BNP (ugly, fat racists) or Britain First (fat, ugly racists) do. That…
/r/MensRights23/04/16 11:12 AM
1

Why do you even give a fuck whose mug gets on your banknotes? It’s not as if anyone sits around admiring the artwork.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 10:31 AM
2

There are no doubt any number of reasons, but one among them has to be that Feminism - in spite of being a partisan political movement - has acquired the kind of status and reputation normally associated with charitable NGOs. The notion that a Feminist or Feminist group could ever be an aggressor in a situation is such anathema to so many people that whenever a Feminist complains of victimisation it is almost always accepted as being true - and anyone who challenges that narrative is loudly decl…
/r/MensRights23/04/16 10:28 AM
4

Pretty much ...
/r/MensRights23/04/16 10:17 AM
10

Also from the FAQ: Who are KAZOO's readers? Bright (and silly, inquisitive, uninhibited) girls, ages 5 to 10. In a way, this is a genius strategy - when a significant number of these girls choose to become more overtly feminine as they start to hit puberty, they’ll no doubt become interested in a whole range of seemingly more ‘adult’ pursuits - clothes and appearance for instance. And of course, when that happens, Feminist groups will be able to point to the pervasive influence of Patriarchy as …
/r/MensRights23/04/16 08:43 AM
23

Go to the FAQ: Why is it called KAZOO? The beauty of the kazoo is that everybody already has what it takes to play one. Just breathe, and its loud, happy sound comes automatically. I want girls to feel the same way about their own voice—that they already have everything it takes to use it. There is a tremendous amount of power—and joy—in making noise. So … the magazine is named after a toy that makes a stupid and meaningless noise? I see ...
/r/MensRights23/04/16 08:37 AM
1

Oh, man, now I’ve gotta get me a long black duster coat, fedora and finger tipless leather gloves...
/r/MensRights23/04/16 06:22 AM
1

Agreed. Also anything ever written or said about the MRM by Laurie Penny, Jessica Valenti, Caroline Criado-Perez, ‘Glosswitch', Jess Phillips MP … etc. etc. etc. ad infinitum
/r/MensRights23/04/16 06:18 AM
4

Oh, my God this is comedy gold: Although the series centers on a female murder-solving scientific genius, the feminists the victim feuded with are presented in the episode as more frightening and violent than the men’s rights activists themselves … And Instead of focusing on the hateful rhetoric of the male activists, Bones introduces a series of contemptible women starting with a vapid narcissist and ending with an iron-wielding murderess. [It] seems to argue that men’s rights activists ... mak…
/r/MensRights23/04/16 06:13 AM
2

Do you know a Youtuber who goes by the name of Mykeru? If not, I strongly recommend either this, this or this - they’re long, but worth every minute.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 10:51 PM
1

… take the survey again until you get the desired results And that right there is as good a reason to oppose ‘applied’ Feminism as any. That, and the actual policies they write off the back of dubious research findings.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 10:47 PM
2

Everything rests on this problem growing and persisting and never being solved. Oh, I assure you that point is crystal clear with me (the “Right?” was meant to indicate a sarcastic rhetorical question). … several thousand … well-salaried, good-benefits jobs are at stake Absolutely, and in amongst that several thousand there’ll be quite a few hustlers in there who know exactly which side of the bread their butter is on. And it’s not just the salary and perks, it’s the kind of work - imagine getti…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 10:45 PM
2

I know what you mean, but the bathrooms thing is more or less a side issue for me. What concerns me more is the terrifying extent to which even a handful of students (i.e. the ones in the video) seem to have bought lock, stock, and barrel into the notion that personal narratives trump all other considerations. “Listen and believe” culture must thrive in an environment where all someone needs to do to declare that an argument has been won is point to their gender/ethnicity/sexuality e.g. Seriousl…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 10:36 PM
7

"Employment Minister"
/r/MensRights22/04/16 04:44 PM
3

Why is that? It kind of depends on where you’re looking: I've been researching on prison reform ... Everything I've found … Are you talking about books, or online news articles, or government statistics or …?
/r/MensRights22/04/16 04:38 PM
1

Well, you know the situation better than me obviously - but I’m just saying that if I think it was me, I’d try to resolve things informally, first. Most people do things with good intentions in my experience so it would be a shame to come down hard on someone if they were genuinely oblivious to the stress they were causing on others. It’s one reason why I strenuously object to the way a lot of social justice types immediately go for the nuclear option over the slightest infraction or often one t…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 04:33 PM
1

I wonder if MR could obtain publicity with a counter-publication to "Everyday Sexism", detailing "Everyday Misandry". You’re reading it right now. Edit By which I mean, a significant chunk of this subreddit does exactly that already.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:47 PM
3

I literally kept giving you hints and was trying all night??? Heh.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:46 PM
1

I've just talked to him and he is going to see if the other people in his class would also be willing to file title IX complaints It’s up to you, but that seems like the nuclear option to me … I think he should at least give the teacher a chance to realise that what she did was inappropriate in a more informal way rather than throw the book at her. I think talking to the dean informally would be the first step. That’s just my opinion obviously - up to you (and him).
/r/MensRights22/04/16 12:54 PM
1

Well it was a social studies class … Then if what you say is true, it has absolutely no bearing I can possibly conceive of on the course and for her to abuse her authority in that way to include it as part of final assessment (i.e. by awarding credit) is frankly unprofessional. The most generous interpretation I can come up with to excuse this behaviour would be that she was trying to make the class “engaging” and "hands on” - but even then that would be an instructional technique and therefore …
/r/MensRights22/04/16 12:07 PM
6

Heh. She was lucky she wasn’t shot.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 11:40 AM
1

Not sure what I could do to prove it's true but it did happen. You can’t (even with video or photo). I’m still dubious now but ... it was so he could … pass the class What class was this and what was the reason for them having to do this? If, for example, it was English Literature and/or Theatre Studies then to be honest, she may have had a completely legitimate reason for asking the students to do this and for awarding a passing credit as part of the assessment regardless of whether or not your…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 10:37 AM
11

If 1.9% of students are sexually assaulted its going to be challenging to get people to accept them regulating their sex life but if 50% of students are sexually assaulted it become much easier … Trying to find an explanation as to why so many people are apparently willing to believe their leafy, suburban campus has a sexual crime rate higher than that of Mogadishu after sundown has vexed me for a long time. How can they buy this shit? Then I saw this video. It seems like it might explain a lot.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 10:03 AM
11

Why are feminist groups so desperately unhappy whenever it's revealed that women aren't actually sexually assaulted on campus as if they lived in a war zone? Good question. It also begs a further question: Why don’t they consider this a sign of success for all the millions of dollars poured into consent training, rape awareness, free rape alarms issued to first year students etc. etc. etc.? If they don’t consider their own campaigning to have had any effect, then surely we should cut their fundi…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 09:59 AM
4

… his teacher made students dress up like women and dance in front of the class for extra credit I sincerely want for this to be untrue, but given the regular absurdities that Feminism and Social Justice Warriors indulge in it’s literally impossible to tell (see Poe’s Law) Anyway, if it’s true and she did this and it wasn’t done with the students' mutual consent, she should be reported to the college principle. It is an abuse of a teacher’s authority to offer academic course credits as an entice…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:49 AM
87

Huff Po on Kesha: Kesha ... discovered the door was open and unlocked, “which was basically an invitation, so I walked in and everything was purple velvet,” she said. “I was very pleased that my fantasy had come true and that there was, in fact, purple velvet everywhere.” Huff Po on Lily Allen’s stalker experience: Lily also reports that an intruder broke into her house in October 2015, carrying something she believes was a knife. Although a friend managed to get rid of the man, the singer says …
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:29 AM
18

“It was so easy,” she told “Tonight Show” host Jimmy Fallon when she stopped by in July 2014. “I cruised up in my dead grandpa’s car, and I get out and there’s a gardener in the front yard so I was like, ‘Here’s five dollars and don’t make a thing about it, I’m just going to slide right under this gate,’ and he just laughed and thought it was funny and that I was charming.” Assuming that part of the story is true, what’s the betting the gardener might have lost his job for just waving her throug…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:26 AM
32

When she came face to face with Prince himself, she said, “He just kind of looked at me funny. He gave me a look like, ‘Who the hell are you?’ and I waved around my CD. I put it on the table, and then I ran away.” How surprising. A total stranger walks directly into your living room and she seems surprised that he gave her a ‘Who the hell are you?’ look. Silly cow.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:23 AM
8

How do I reply to this email from my school? I honestly wouldn’t reply to them at all unless the reason for them citing the 1 in 5 statistic is to introduce a new policy or measure that would have an impact on your life or studies. For example, if they are simply explaining this in an email but not asking anyone to take any action as a result of it then this is simply their way of appeasing the Angry Fire Goddess that is Campus-Feminism in the hope it won’t erupt a shit-ton of bad publicity all …
/r/MensRights22/04/16 05:44 AM
1

About Capitalism, I agree with her, although I don't consider myself a Marxist or communist. I find it difficult to understand how you can agree with her while at the same time reject edit [the idea of being] a Marxist or Communist - I mean, I’m sure you can justify how and why but it’s hard to imagine. About men's weakness, I would say I agree with you, … I’m sorry, but I don’t understand what this is referring to - I said nothing about men’s weakness at all. Just to be clear, all I did was sum…
/r/MensRights21/04/16 10:17 PM
1

Ok, any suggestions? Decide on a single message first so you are clear what it is you want the person who sees it to take away with them, remember and think about. If the message you settle on has nothing whatever to do with Men’s Rights, that’s your choice of course, but probably not much point in asking us for our opinion here as we are fairly international (Canadians, Australians, Irish, English, Scots, Welsh, Kiwis, South Africans, Indians, Germans, Swedes, Spaniards as well as Americans).
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:17 PM
2

Any thoughts? I’m not from the US so don’t have a dog in this fight, but regardless I’m with u/Wagnersh on this. There’s too much text (again) and so what exactly is the main message that you’d want someone to take away with them? At the moment it could any one from: Don’t vote Clinton; Do vote Sanders; Feminism is toxic; Reason is an important principle; Progress is important; America needs to be united … probably some others. They’re all fighting for attention from one another and it’s also no…
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:14 PM
1

To be honest, I’m not particularly interested in TRP, but thanks for letting me know anyway.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:05 PM
4

Has Twitter’s core gone into meltdown yet? Edit Oof! I see that it has. Much horror and great alarums from people carrying the #RapeCulture #ChedEvans tags. They seem to have only just discovered that some people on Twitter make free with rather unparliamentary language and are just altogether not very genteel. They appear to think such people are hard proof that the whole of society likes nothing better than to high five rapists on a job well done.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 11:01 AM
1

I’m guessing it’s Monkey Branching as well.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 06:46 AM
3

… you were clearly either white knighting or feminist in your reaction … You were the first … to take up the feminist viewpoint … You've been caught out. Give it up, you lost, … You’re too clever for me. I see I shall have to try a better disguise next time, evidently. EDIT Ah, nearly forgot - here’s the cunning disguise you managed to see through. Well done there, champ. KrisK_lvin 677 link karma 10,406 comment karma subreddit link comment MensRights 645 7204 TumblrInAction 2 2030
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:03 PM
2

Knowing that the only thing I have to look forward to in life is meeting a woman who doesn't actually like me but will "settle" for me (women don't like me so that's obviously what it's going to be) after she's done having fun with the guys she really likes … Are you sure aren’t confusing this subreddit with r/TheRedPill or possibly /r/MGTOW? I mean it sounds like what you’re describing is what those guys call the cock carousel or maybe monkey branching. How do you deal with this type of frustra…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 10:47 PM
3

… is she a feminist? Yes, but then so is Christina Hoff-Sommers, author of The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men. You might want to read this interview with Paglia before making your mind up.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 10:00 PM
3

"One of feminism’s irritating reflexes is its fashionable disdain for “patriarchal society,” to which nothing good is ever attributed. But it is patriarchal society that has freed me as a woman. It is capitalism that has given me the leisure to sit at this desk writing this book. Let us stop being small-minded about men and freely acknowledge what treasures their obsessiveness has poured into culture [ … ] If civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts.” Ca…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:35 PM
2

Look I don’t really care I was just trying to point out the nature of the offence, i.e. 16 is the age of consent out of school, but in school it evidently is an offence: five charges of sexual activity with a boy aged between 13 and 17 while in a position of trust.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 07:46 PM
2

But the subhead says: She today admitted five charges of sexual activity with a boy aged between 13 and 17 while in a position of trust
/r/MensRights20/04/16 07:28 PM
5

There are a few subs that have recently decided to try and have /r/mensrights classified as a hate sub, and removed under reddits new hatesub policy. Godwin’s Law and all that aside, but seriously what does it say about these people that not only do they have to completely fabricate the kind of offensive language that would get this place [banned] in the first place, but also that they find it so easy to spew up the most hateful racist and sexist bigotry? I mean just what kind of putrid lake of …
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:40 PM
1

Of course, no - and ditto on the people at the top.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:27 PM
2

Oh, look a brand new account! Why I am just never expected that!
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:27 PM
1

Some of them are for sure, and definitely these two … but there’s a few that know exactly what they’re doing. I’m sure you know who I mean.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:24 PM
2

I’m sure you’re right … as there were two of them, I’m thinking teenagers but they could well be much older. It’s kind of interesting to me that when 4Chan anons do things like Piss for Equality, it’s this subreddit that seems to draw the heat from it. I genuinely don’t think they make any kind of a distinction.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:25 PM
14

That example you linked to is absolutely priceless. Not only is u/Maryleehart, the one who created the post asking Did anyone see the accused with Jodie foster? and Was she the victim or instigator?, a brand new account, but so too is the account of u/Fillyfally who was the first person to answer with such gems as: Definitely instigator. She was definitely to blame for the incident as she should never have gotten herself into that situation. And: Teach women to keep safe and fewer will get raped…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 04:40 PM
1

Ta!
/r/MensRights20/04/16 04:20 PM
-6

You’re always welcome, fuck you very much.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 03:29 PM
-6

Fuck off pal.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 03:24 PM
1

I disagree. How is that even possible? If anyone says to you in a fleering tone ‘Oh, but that’s just cherry-picking! Anyone can cherry-pick” You amaze me - just who do you suppose is intended by “anyone” using a “fleering tone” (fleering means ‘impudent and jeering’) in response to showing them that meme? Who do you think would be more likely to jeer at that meme and be dismissive of it as an example of cherry-picking? A Feminist, an MRA or an undecided by-stander? If your answer is anything but…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 03:03 PM
1

What does *; mean? Sorry … (!)
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:48 PM
6

There's no need to shift arguments. I’m not. This is not cherry picking. Yes, I’m well aware of that, but are you seriously trying to tell me that this wouldn’t presented to you as rebuttal from a defender of feminism and social justice? If even Janice Fiamengo can be “called out” by Adele Mercier for ‘cherry picking’ I think it’s even more likely to happen to everyone else. If someone attempts to claim that these people are outliers, they are demonstrably wrong. Yes … that’s why I said "they fu…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:47 PM
5

Strange that there’s absolutely not mention there of Feminisms as an anti-Democratic pro-censorship political ideology; its poisonous influence on legal rights (e.g. innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt); its overwhelming influence in universities and in many broadsheet newspapers; its similarly strong influence on political discourse and government policy (all while being unelected); its naked abuse of the nation’s financial resources to fund the spread of its ideological messag…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:54 AM
46

Note: If anyone says to you in a fleering tone ‘Oh, but that’s just cherry-picking! Anyone can cherry-pick*” ask them to whether or not they think we live in a rape culture. If they say yes, then they fundamentally agree with the principle of everyone of those quotes in that meme.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:08 AM
2

They tend to do hatred very well, but I usually think of their hate as a means rather than an end. The end is Women’s Liberation - not liberation from unequal or discriminatory laws, but liberation from the other 49% of the species. Feminisms are nothing to do with equality between men and women, they’re dreams of full Independence of women from men. Edit Anyone who tells you contrariwise is either a barefaced liar or a useful idiot.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:05 AM
2

How does that comment relate to the article in the link?
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:53 AM
1

Heh. That amused me too … it’s as if someone has just copy-pasted the course description of a Women’s Studies module then forgotten to change women and girls to men and boys. Lol indeed ...
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:48 AM
3

It’s late and I’m tired, but … that’s steaming pile of horseshit, isn’t it? … our analysis estimates the impact of including female jurors on what had been all-male juries, providing a sharper and more meaningful comparison for assessing the broad impact of female representation. How can it be "a sharper and more meaningful comparison” edit [for today] if it’s based on records from between 1921 and 1926? And just how “broad” are they talking? There is also evidence of some ‘selection’ of females…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 11:12 PM
3

I have to admit I had absolutely no idea who Caroline Glick was - for anyone else in the same boat here is her website’s About page. And here’s the original article (from 2010) where the quote comes from: Our World: The feminist deception
/r/MensRights19/04/16 10:45 PM
3

I didn’t read the article, but I saw the ad. It actually makes me despair that there is a single narrative on what is such a complex issue; it makes me despair even more that the narrative that’s out there is one so out of kilter with reality. This is the triumph of Feminism in academia - the graduates become activists, the activists pressure the government, the government turns to academia for expertise, and the ‘expertise’ is rubber stamped by the same academic Feminists - the point where the …
/r/MensRights19/04/16 10:40 PM
2

I can only speak from my own experience and would prefer not to go into details, but I have contacted The Samaritans on two occasions in the past and do not recognise the description given in that blog post. That is not my saying that people such as "Isaac T. Quill"’s experience did not happen, but only that I don’t personally don’t recognise it. The people I called allowed me to be silent when I couldn’t or wouldn’t speak even when these periods of silence went on for whole minutes at a time ti…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:52 PM
2

do the police judge suspicious women who are pick pockets? As far as I know, they do yes, but it would be interesting to find out what kind of resources go into combatting pickpockets and physical assaults (on men) compared to sexual offences such as getting groped. I mean don’t get me wrong, it’s clearly unpleasant to be touched sexually in an enclosed space where you can’t get away … but it’s not as if getting manhandled by a ‘drunk’ who turns out to be a distraction while someone else rips yo…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 05:23 PM
2

Having police look into such allegations is infinitely better than having schools take responsibility for doing it - something that should never have been allowed in the first place for such a serious criminal charge as sexual assault and rape. It’s mind boggling that this was ever allowed to be dealt with as an internal procedure rather than as a police matter. But ... It would prevent false accusations and I personally believe of you were actually raped, you should press charges, but that's ju…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 05:00 PM
2

Well, precisely. And you would hope that the police would be able to distinguish between that and someone with a criminal intent - not just sexual offences, but the squadrons of professional pickpockets who work the underground as well. But then the police are under pressure to find resolutions to the number of reports to make it looks as if they are being proactive. How likely is that to affect their judgment in the way it affected their judgment (and professionalism for that matter) in Pearson…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:07 PM
1

Very droll. EDIT Now with added A/V ; - )
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:11 PM
14

Men Can Stop Rape Hmm - I wonder what the reaction would if the shoe were on the other foot? You know, if such things existed as: Women Can Stop Infanticide Women Can Stop Divorce and the Break Up of the Family Women Can Stop Prostitution I mean, can you imagine the fucking uproar if any of those were real? But Men Can Stop Rape? Fuck it, that’s absolutely fine, let’s just put posters up all over public transport for that one.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 10:31 AM
5

I’m not sure I can even quite believe that ad is aimed at men. I’m pretty sure it’s real target is women and the idea is to make them fear and loathe any man, whatever his ethnicity and no matter how charming he looks or how pleasant he seems. Here’s a link to the organisation that produced it - they’re called Men Can Stop Rape: Creating Cultures Free From Violence If it’s possible, they sound even less fun than you would imagine from that advert. Pour example: Men Can Stop Rape seeks to mobiliz…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 10:17 AM
1

I’m sorry to hear that. Needless to say, people say hurtful things to each during break-ups. Her saying that to you was clearly designed to would you.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:14 AM
1

Oh, I’m so sorry - I read your message too quickly and took ‘anecdotal’ to mean ‘I don’t have a source for it’ not in the sense of ‘It actually happened to me’. Sincere apologies for that. Still, in a wider sense that news story together with yours just confirms my concern that when the police are under active political and financial pressure to deliver results on gropers, and when it is ever so easy to mistake being pressed up against someone in a crush to being groped against your will … I jus…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:12 AM
1

This is the story here, I think - it’s a little different from how you recall it but not completely off: A FOOTBALL fan arrested during a Bristol Rovers match for being drunk has been found not guilty – after a doctor said police had mistaken his stroke symptoms for intoxication.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 05:37 AM
1

Thanks for sharing! / s
/r/MensRights19/04/16 05:00 AM
2

Let me make this very clear – groping and other forms of sexual assault do happen on public transport such as the London Underground. No one is denying that, least of all me. But do you remember the case of artist Mark Pearson? Here's how The Telegraph summed it up: Prosecutors slowed down CCTV in case of commuter cleared of 'bizarre' sex assault on actress: Video led to Mark Pearson being charged with sex assault after walking past woman in busy railway station - but footage had been altered No…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 09:46 PM
6

Well, exactly - the pretence is so utterly transparent it beggars belief that they can get away with it. They are the epitome of ignorant people for whom a little bit of knowledge is dangerous.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:56 PM
2

Probably not very much - or at least it will only affect those who are in the same situation i.e. where the parents are separated. The article doesn’t say, but it seems likely that if they weren’t circumcised shortly after their birth then I would hazard a guess that the father is either a recent convert or a lapsed Muslim (is that the right phrase?) who has rediscovered his faith later in life. For married Muslim and Jewish couples who have children, I imagine the decision to have their childre…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:55 PM
2

[EDIT Forgot to mention, that redditor’s comment on the article is pure gold.] Jesus what an asshole that Guardian mod. is - look at this bit: Ultimately, the biggest problems in comment threads come down to “agenda trolls”: the people so convinced they are right that they ride into a conversation not to join it, but to rip it apart. They are comment-thread poison – men’s rights activists who act as if articles about women’s issues are their gender’s single biggest problem, climate change denier…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:28 PM
1

Just like every other thing that has ever issued forth from the Green Party ...
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:14 PM
3

She really should be.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:08 PM
1

Some of them likely do flagellate themselves, morally at least, on a regular basis, sure. But I don’t think it’s specific to being Feminist so much as all part of middle class guilt about being (relatively) privileged and having a burning desire to do the right thing. So it’s never perceived as hatred of themselves, only as lover for other people. Well, I say love for other people - not MRAs obviously as we are something belched up from Satan's lake of fire to test the resolve of the righteous.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:06 PM
1

Why do male feminists hate themselves so much? Do they all themselves though? Do all of them hate themselves at all even? There must be at least a few of them that do it out of narcissism. The most famous example of which has seriously got to be Justin “Tommy Carcetti from HBO’s The Wire” Trudeau. Just look at that guy’s eyes - he is positively drowning in his own reflection. He is Narcissus incarnate. edit Link fixed.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:03 PM
3

That’s a quality response. We should set up some kind of award for good responses to bad posts.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:55 PM
3

OK, found it now cheers - there’s a video of it here for anyone interested. I also came across this story from the Daily Mail which shows that it was hugely unpopular with the target audience - or at least the part where the celebrity doctor checked the guy’s parts live on air. they cut to a survivor talking about their story - 'oh, but it was her actions that saved the day and we men are useless’ I’ve got to be honest here and say that this really doesn’t bother me - the audience for that dayti…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:53 PM
1

Cool bananas
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:05 PM
1

Oh no, I agree it’s great I just meant to make sure the post got to the right fella - which I just see it has so all good. Thanks, again.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:05 PM
1

Thanks - you should probably make sure OP (edit: u/Florient ) sees this message as well as/rather than me. (I think some people in the thread might have confused me and him)
/r/MensRights18/04/16 12:45 PM
5

I tried to Google the campaigns you’re talking about, but it just came up with ads for women’s lingerie so I don’t really know what you’re referring to … however, and you may not like what I’m about to say, but it’s worth considering the following: the majority of men are absolutely appalling at going to the doctors - they just don’t go unless it’s to the emergency room. However, they may be more likely to go if pressed to do so by a female partner - so the logic is presumably to target the men …
/r/MensRights18/04/16 10:28 AM
1

So, I am a Troll because … Actually, other people called you a troll. My comment was specifically that: You may or may not be a troll … The point I am making is a serious one and it relates to your comment here: I see the kind of man's suffering the subreddit is about as the other face of the same problem many women have. I understand this and there is some truth here - there must be as we all live in society together so of course there are connections (fathers-daughters; husbands-wives etc.). B…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:57 AM
1

Very true.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:06 AM
1

Ah, yes of course - that would explain an awful lot now I think about it. Thanks.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:05 AM
1

Heh, cheers!
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:50 PM
1

Seriously PUT THE FUCKING BOTTLE DOWN and GO TO BED you fucking bell end. We know it’s you, GooseyLooseyPlooseyFlooseyFuckhead whatever your last username was.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:49 PM
1

Got to love that Post Modern Jukebox. I think they did a version of 'Oops I Did it Again' in that kind of Raider’s of the Lost Ark: Temple of Doom Shanghai era nightclub style.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:44 PM
3

I don't know about Feminism 101. You may or may not be a troll, but everything I can see in that interview is pretty standard Feminist thinking. It shouldn’t be surprising. She even actually says: "soy feminista de segunda generación. No soy una nueva converse.” [I’m a second wave Feminist. I’m not (some) new convert.] And also this part from the introduction makes it very clear where Segato’s politics are: La antropóloga argentina Rita Segato es una de las voces más lúcidas e inquietas a la hor…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:42 PM
2

More than postmodernism, I see Marxism. Postmodernism is Marxist … well, Marxoid might be better. So is Feminism. Essentially, they are all looking for a way to overthrow society as it exists now. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:04 PM
1

in 12 months raised the awareness of male suicide by 40% in london OK that’s fantastic and I feel bad about being dubious about it - probably a good thing I’m not in advertising obviously(!) I must confess the Samaritans have got me out of not one, but two tight squeezes before now so … I know you weren’t meaning to knock their work, but just wanted to point that out. If you can think of a campaign that would reach you and others you know, tell calmzone. For sure I would, though as noted it’s pr…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:02 PM
1

Tsk … What did you think of that campaign? I saw them all up around Nottingham bus stops when I was working there for a spell last year and … it’s better than nothing, sure, but I thought the whole campaign was too jokey in a blokey kind of way - or is that just me being jaded (for a change / s)?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:45 PM
1

Can you send us the link to the original Spanish language source, please? Edit I’d still like to see the original, but from the above it just looks like typical Feminism 101 with a strong flavour of French postmodernism and postcolonial theories thrown in there as well.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:40 PM
3

Look mate, why don't you put the bottle away and shut the computer down for the night? It’s good to let off some steam now and again but this is like the fourth hysterical post you’ve put up in the last hour and they’re really not improving any the more you do them. Nothing ever good comes out of being drunk in charge of a keyboard and at least you’ve done nothing worse than be mildly embarrassing.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:37 PM
4

The same woman (Dr Marsha Scott) is also on the board of Engender. This is her: "Dr Marsha Scott is a feminist activist, researcher and practitioner and has advocated, volunteered, researched, and worked in the violence against women sector in the United Kingdom, the United States and Europe for 20 years […] Dr. Scott is convener of the UK Joint Committee on Women, and sits on the board of Engender, Scotland’s national feminist organisation, and is the UK Expert delegate to the EWL’s European Ob…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:32 PM
1

You really are a fucking prick, aren’t you?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:17 PM
1

It’s not that long ago it was just managing to keep hold of a job that was driving men nuts.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 08:34 PM
22

I posted some men's rights fliers in bathrooms in bars and clubs It’s great that you’re trying to do something positive, but is it possible there’s a little bit too much text there for a bathroom wall poster? I’m not in advertising or marketing or anything like that, but possibly the actual content might need a second look if you want it to have impact - what do you think? I wonder if it might be an idea to drop the negative part about radical feminism? edit [It’s a distraction and part of a dee…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 08:01 PM
1

Autism also a possibility.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:39 PM
5

That’s really well-written and genuinely moving. Well worth the read and especially for the devotion and dedication each of her three fathers (her biological dad and two step-dads) showed to her. Thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:09 PM
1

Are you trying to troll me?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 06:59 PM
4

The question was a rhetorical one to be honest, but as I hadn’t known that was the background to it that’s really interesting. That said I find it hard to believe it was money alone that motivated them; probably there was some misguided notion of ‘bringing the movement up-to-date’ or some such reason.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 06:57 PM
1

Of course it does! It really doesn’t. You used it earlier as evidence that men had a higher sex drive than women and that, as I have repeatedly pointed out, is not what it demonstrates. All it demonstrates is that men use pornography at many times a higher rate than women do; however - as you have singularly ignored again - you have not addressed the point that just because women don’t use pornography it does not mean they do not find erotic stimulation through other means - erotic fictions, vib…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:17 PM
1

Oh, sorry I did read that probably a bit too quick before responding before.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:54 PM
1

Oh, I see - that would make sense. Thanks.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:54 PM
1

it would depend how transparent the guy was If that was the case then it just means they’d throw the book at him when they found out - and they always do.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:48 PM
1

Oh, OK I see. I was thinking of it in UK terms - all legal taxi / private hire car services have to be registered and licensed with the local councils. Similarly, anyone can open a restaurant but they can be and sometimes are closed down for hygiene breaches (amongst other things) - such as this - don’t read while preparing food.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:47 PM
2

So a private individual has to actively make a claim then? How come if it’s against the law, wouldn’t the local authorities in Boston put a stop to it before it’s begun by refusing it a license to operate?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:26 PM
1

It's not a survey. OK. I wasn’t aware - your earlier message simply said: According to pornhub only 20% of the vitiators [sic] are women! I didn’t click on that link. But even if it did it makes absolutely no difference to the point I was making which still stands - you are claiming that men have a higher sex drive than women and using the fact that PornHub’s visitors are 80% male as evidence. What I’m saying is that all that gives you evidence about is who visits porn sites more often (men) - w…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:56 PM
1

There you go then - the guy’s screwed ; - )
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:36 PM
1

Well, I don’t know how accurate that is, but it certainly proves the point I was trying to make. The real question about the "Whiny feminist” who asks querulously "why society shames me if I sleep with hundreds of guys, but when a guy sleeps with many girls they call him a playboy?” is whether or not it’s even true that guys walk around bragging about how many girls they’ve slept with. Aside from rappers, rock stars and the odd lounge lizard night club owner, in my experience at least it’s actua…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:11 PM
1

Only a complete idiot would choose a girlfriend who had many previous partners. Only a complete idiot would believe the ‘number’ his girlfriend gives him is the real one. You know that thing women do where they only include long(ish) term relationships in their ‘number’ but not one-night stands which they tend to erase from their conversation, if not their memory? Or are you going to tell me that’s wrong?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 11:06 AM
2

It's 110% illegal here in Boston Really? Wow (on a side note, I’ve been to Boston - lovely place). Are you sure there aren’t any loopholes or special dispensations? For example, domestic violence shelters in the UK are legally allowed to only recruit women members of staff - or at least that was the case until very recently and I’m certain it’s still true now. Therefore if it’s presented as a safety measure it might pass on those grounds. I mean it’s still shitty, sexist and stupid, but they mig…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 11:04 AM
1

"social experiment” If you think that proves anything at all, you are the reason cuckoldry is a thing.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:58 AM
7

"We felt that player customization had got a bit out of control in other games," added Newman. Because God forbid your customers would have the temerity to want to personalise their role-playing game world characters! What an asshole! That game’s company deserves to sink without trace.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:08 AM
3

Yes, it’s real. There already are women only taxi and bus services in the UK, or at least there used to be and as far as I know they still have them.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:33 AM
4

My troop had hazing. Yep. And it’s really hard to explain to people who haven’t experienced it (and obviously I’m not talking of it getting completely out of hand), but hazing done right is not bullying - it’s a proper initiation into the group and at some subconscious level that’s completely understood. Can you imagine the uproar if a bunch of guys get the larger tent pegs and some rope to stake out both arms and both legs of some guys and then pour eggs, flour, and whatever other crap is left …
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:29 AM
1

Well, I beg to differ. It does have that, yes, but it was quite a bit more nuanced. There’s stuff in there that would warm the heart of a feminist, true, but there was a lot more in the way of critiques of those ideas.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:18 AM
16

I have never understood the decision to allow girls into the boy scouts while retaining the girl guides as a separate institution (to which boys are not allowed). I know a lot of people wax lyrical about the benefits of being a Scout, but I was one and I think it really did make a difference. We learned camping skills, orienteering, and all that jazz, yes, but we also learnt discipline, confidence building, self-awareness and group cohesion and a whole number of other things as well. Maybe those…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:50 AM
1

No idea but Y: The Last Man takes a really good look at this and comes up with a cracking story to boot.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:39 AM
1

Fairly certain you’ve copy pasted this to the wrong person - at one point you say: you seemed to allude to this but it was mixed up with your agrument that men would look more appealing to women if they cared aboot their image more.Makeup isn't going to fix this massive difference in libido! I’ve never said any such thing ever to my knowledge and I certainly haven’t talked about make up and libido in this thread. But anyway, I decided to write a response regardless because of something that caug…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:36 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 08:32 PM
2

Well, they all say they don’t. It’s hard to say this without being crude, but if you (i.e. ‘one’ / 'anyone') are seeing a woman and she’s a little insecure about her breasts or her ass or her weight or her hair or etc., etc. it doesn’t make you a liar to be reassuring and/or skilfully avoid bringing it up and/or focussing strongly on the parts of her body you know she is happier with and so on. What would be the point of going to bed with a woman and you (‘one’) saying to her - “You’re tits aren…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:27 PM
1

Oh, look this is just a fucking waste of time if you’re going to ignore the point I’ve made more than once and fixate obsessively on the one point I have never argued against.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:15 PM
7

Is that news? Surely every adult knows that already, don’t they?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:35 PM
1

Y The Last Man by Brian K. Vaughan and Pia Guerra is a great work of fiction based on more or less the same premise. That trailer, however, makes that movie look like a 9-week old desiccated piece of dog shit. Sometimes it really isn’t the plot, just the delivery.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:32 PM
1

That’s absolutely true, but as far as I understand they weren’t caught in the act in the school but she was dobbed in by his parents. That doesn’t make her doing it in the school correct, but all manner of shenanigans go on after hours or in stolen moments in store cupboards, sick rooms, on top of photocopiers etc. etc. in enough ‘public’ places of work to make that aspect of it unexceptional.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:26 PM
1

Feminists win on the back of one vote then, I see ...
/r/MensRights16/04/16 05:26 PM
1

Even when it was not a student of hers? What if, on school grounds but out of hours, a 31F teacher had sex with her 35M husband? It’s unsavoury, but is it legally actionable? I know it’s different because he was not only young, but in that state at leastillegally young and she should have known better, but so long as she wasn’t doing it in class in front of a bunch of 6 year-olds (she wasn’t!) is that such a big crime?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 05:25 PM
1

Sorry: There are any number of uncouth, ignorant, low IQ, morons out there who happen to be women and who happen to get laid and squeeze out kids so, following the late great Bill Hicks, a woman doesn’t have to have any particularly special ability to get pregnant.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 05:23 PM
1

That double standard is the real point here. Oh, please don’t get me wrong I understand that - but what I’m trying to say is that in at least half or more of the countries in the EU (including England), even in reverse 31M and 16F, it would still be legal (here).
/r/MensRights16/04/16 05:22 PM
20

Crazy is remarkably self-aware and good at concealing itself, but … of course, yes.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 05:21 PM
1

The scapegoat for the downfall of society. Heh. Good point.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 08:24 AM
559

Matched a girl on Tinder and had a debate for over an hour. I think you’re doing Tinder wrong.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:35 AM
6

Some of these cartoons I find a bit tedious, but I actually like this one because it shows where the real problem is - the chick in the middle, not the crackpot on the left. What Karen Straughan calls “coffee shop Feminists” are the real issue because they are so often the ones who are actually most willing to get behind and defend vigorously concepts and politics they clearly know little about. How else do you explain Conservative women who describe themselves as Feminists? I mean, how can they…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:33 AM
1

There's a natural series of cause and effect steps involved in the process of pregnancy to birth, so long as you stay healthy and alive … Yes, sure but that doesn’t address the point I made to the other guy’s point that “the ability to bear children … is largely a passive ability” which was: I think that’s highly arguable - it’s not that it’s untrue, but it’s only true within a very restricted focus. There are any number of uncouth, ignorant, low IQ, morons out there who happen to be women and w…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:26 AM
1

If that were true, so what? The query is whether this is a legal or a moral distinction and where do the lines get drawn? If she were 21 not 31 and he were still 16 as now, do you think the parents would still have reported her? Maybe, I’m not so sure. 16 year olds are idiots. That's why we put adults in jail for fucking them. I’ve made it clear the age gape is yay wide and highly questionable for all that, but at what point does a child become an adult to the point where you’re willing to have …
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:17 AM
1

If what was in a school what wouldn’t she be/do?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:11 AM
2

I think you’re confusing having a baby with taking a shit.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:10 AM
1

Ah, well that settles that then.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:09 AM
1

All it seems to say is they once had sex on the school premises. In any case, she could get a maximum of 13 years for something that over here (England) would legal (even if it would be frowned on socially).
/r/MensRights15/04/16 11:01 PM
1

… it is largely a passive ability. I think that’s highly arguable - it’s not that it’s untrue, but it’s only true within a very restricted focus. On the other hand men, who dont bear children, are expected to constantly prove their worth to everyone. Expected by who? And to what extent do they bend to that pressure? This is a subjective view, but I see a lot of men who seem to have successfully come to an accommodation with both a childless existence and the need to compete aggressively. I don’t…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 09:12 PM
5

She reportedly met the 16-year-old victim through sports. The age of consent in the UK is 16 and although she’s a teacher, she wasn’t his teacher and they didn’t meet at work. In other words, while that is still quite some age gap, if that had happened in England, it would be perfectly legal.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 08:21 PM
3

As a side note, I think you are supposed to have blocked out her name and photo from that screen grab. That aside, without more context for the conversation I can’t really see anything particularly controversial there. She’s absolutely right that evolution is indifferent to human morality and as for the stuff about lifting, carrying and making sandwiches that’s clearly just a tongue-in-cheek joke. I don’t get how you’ve arrived at the idea that she’s insisting men aren’t necessary from these two…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 08:15 PM
0

No. I mean I can see what you’re driving at, but it’s far too polarised a view to agree with. I mean even on the most fundamental level, do you rate giving birth as part of a woman’s existence or something that she does for others? Even putting that to one side, it rather seems to devalue all the valuable contributions women make to society so the point is overstated where they’re concerned. Similarly, where does that leave so-called ‘herbivore’ men or MGTOW or basically any other category of si…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 08:08 PM
2

From the article (my emphasis): Specifically, in their analysis of sexual-assault cases at a large university, the authors found that 5.9 percent of cases were provably false. However, 44.9 percent cases “did not proceed” – meaning there was insufficient evidence, the accuser was uncooperative, or the incident did not meet the legal standard of assault. An additional 13.9 percent of cases could not be categorized due to lack of information. The "accuser was uncooperative” and "could not be categ…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:46 PM
2

TL;DR
/r/MensRights14/04/16 09:59 PM
3

Point taken ; - )
/r/MensRights14/04/16 05:16 PM
4

Oh yeah - thank God for that!
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:13 PM
1

That message got 43 points.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:08 PM
1

Good work.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 06:38 AM
2

women can be predators just as much as men Yes, I would say that’s probably true - but it’s rarely accepted or even acknowledged largely, I think, because women’s sexuality is most often portrayed as harmless, benign, healthy, good etc. (in contrast to men’s which is very often seen as suspect, threatening, sinister and so on). It’s an oddly Victorian era notion.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 04:44 AM
1

Puh ha ha ha … That was perfect! I saw Dunham’s ‘bunny fingers’ before scrolling down and when i did scroll down I nearly pissed myself laughing (quite literally thank you very much!)
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:33 PM
2

Oh, it still happens for sure - the estimated degree to which paternity fraud is a real thing should be telling in that regard. The other point, one which Feminists support in theory but apparently not in practice, is that women enjoy sex (all other things being equal) as much as men do. Saying that shouldn’t, to my mind at least, be even remotely controversial, but amazingly all manner of people challenge the idea for all sorts of reasons.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:30 PM
1

Heh … good point. Although not sure the reaction to his particular solution was entirely unexpected ...
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:58 PM
2

A few times a month you would get some sort of offer. It’s remarkable the extent to which an experience that was not so long ago commonly acknowledged has, since around the 70s or 80s, apparently disappeared from view altogether.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:57 PM
1

It's odd to me how feminists don't realize if they were more vocal against false rape charges, they would have so much respect and credibility in general. Like God, they move in the most mysterious of ways. Which is perhaps why they draw the ire of so many prominent atheists ...
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:55 PM
3

I have a work commitment I can’t shift those days when it’s on - there’ll be video of some sessions too, I assume?
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:26 AM
2

Well, thanks for your input there. / s This is not an opportunity to brag about backseat sexual encounters you fucking retard. Even though it appeared in The Sun, there is still a serious point about how there is pressure on legal systems in many western countries to remove due process, effectively shifting the burden of proof from the accuser onto the accused.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:16 AM
1

TL;DR - if I’ve got this right, did the guy take the photo of the girl from behind? So why didn’t he just approach her and try to talk when they were both in the supermarket at the same time?
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:10 AM
6

Its not her fault. She’s only 25 and yet as the report explained: "she already has 36 convictions for 64 offences” and evidently has an issue with substance abuse, is or has been homeless, and by her own admission has worked as a prostitute. While strictly speaking some of this is literally her own doing, she is certainly deserving of sympathy and she clearly needs some kind of intervention for her own sake. All of that said, this part: "she slapped [the taxi driver] across the face and […] thre…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 09:12 PM
8

Guardian: "All men suck!” Commenters: "No we don't!" [Comment Removed] Guardian: "Look at the abuse we get!" That.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 06:40 PM
16

Not even hiding it. They are literally giving examples of disagreeing with a Feminist opinion - no matter how ill-informed or obnoxious that opinion is - to be de facto sexist.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 06:39 PM
12

Heh. One of the many contradictions for a lot of self-proclaimed Feminists in general is that while on the one hand they want to insist that women can be as bad ass as men and should be in frontline combat units no matter what, on the other they fundamentally hold tight to the idea that women’s sexuality is always benign, safe and ‘just a a bit of a laugh’, that of men’s is malign, dangerous and instills fear in womankind. It would be so much easier if they just conceded that there are some real…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 06:21 PM
2

Yep.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:21 PM
17

Story in a nutshell: A DRUNK and drugged up female passenger […] Gemma Pinkerton, 25, told the shocked driver she was a prostitute before molesting him 20 to 30 times over his clothing. When he rejected her offer for sex instead of £26.50 for the trip she then tried to blackmail him and claimed she would report him for sexual assault [ …] she assaulted him and damaged his car before he threw her from the vehicle. Jailing her for a total of 30 months, Judge Ian Lawrie said she had blackmailed the…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:07 PM
2

Why do you want to know? Conceptually, hegemonic masculinity proposes to explain how and why men maintain dominant social roles over women, and other gender identities, which are perceived as “feminine" in a given society. Note that a key point here is that the underlying premise - that men are in fact dominant over women and 'other gender identities ...perceived as “feminine”’ - goes unquestioned. Therefore the theory is in effect a solution to a problem that has yet to be proven even exists. Y…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:39 AM
5

However, as history has shown time and time again, censorship doesn't really tend to work that well […] combined with the fact that feminists are remarkably stupid creatures results in pretty much everything they ever do blowing up in their face … While I appreciate that you must feel vindicated right now with the increases in subscriptions and ad revenue and while I also don’t want to kill your buzz any, I would like to sound a note of caution here. As an activist movement with revolutionary pr…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:14 AM
1

OK I’ll have a look … though coincidentally I’ve literally just sent you a message mentioning that I was a bit underwhelmed by it, but anyway cheers and I will have a look-see.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:53 PM
1

Right, well, I’ve watched the video now and it tells me quite a few things: The first is that interesting though the video is it bears no relation to the central theme I’ve been trying argue right from the outset - that doesn’t mean I necessarily I disagree with the video, simply that it is irrelevant to my point (even if it was relevant to yours) - it’s therefore “informative” on a subject and perhaps your subject, but not mine; Secondly, from a single viewing only, I was a bit underwhelmed. Wh…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:50 PM
1

Haven’t watched it yet, but thanks for the video - I actually started watching that ages ago after someone (TL;DR I think?) recommended it on his (or her?) YouTube channel but for whatever reason never finished watching it. I’ll give it a go.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:54 PM
1

What do you mean “now”? This shit has been going on for ages already.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:19 PM
3

there were some comments made by some female fans that had me wondering if they would've been acceptable had they been made by a male fan to a female celebrity. You know r/LadyBoners on Reddit is a thing, don’t you? If not, and should you choose to peruse the ‘fine art’ on display there, do have a look at the tone of some random comments I’ve cut and pasted from there just the now: First thought: nom nom nom nom nom nom nom [This to a photo of a rippped male model's torso] I'm in a lucky generat…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:18 PM
1

Somehow I think I’ll survive that terrible slur ...
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:03 PM
1

This is you
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:54 PM
1

This situation isn't about the woman's perspective Then you haven’t been paying attention. At all. vicious insults Eh? … my disagreement that women should not be treated like children. You’ve been shadow boxing this whole time.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:33 PM
1

This is what I mean by "feelings don't matter a jot”. A perception isn’t a feeling; a point of view is not feels. Why are you so upset at the idea of trying to see something from the point of view of someone else? Do those ludicrous Alpha male bastardised Evo-Psych theories have so much meaning to you personally that you cannot and will not even acknowledge that someone else could perceive a situation differently from the way you do? Are you honestly arguing that it's the responsibility of men ……
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:04 PM
0

Yep
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:33 PM
0

Lol what. I believe that’s Lol3 actually - I think I should start charging you if you’re enjoying yourself this much. Statistical truths about a group … I must say I do admire the gay abandon with which you throw the word “truth” around; it’s almost touching. Sex drive twice as high as women's =/= Uncontrollable … That was easy. It’s only easy because you’re not particularly bright. On the one hand you want to insist that the male sex drive is much higher; on the other you want to deny that ther…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:32 PM
0

Feminists believe we live under patriarchy. I believe we live under matriarchy. The difference is between a ‘P’ and an ‘M’; changing a surface detail like that makes no difference to fundamental underlying concept. Catholics and Protestants murdered each other over centuries yet both still share the same fundamental core concept and both are Christian.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:09 PM
1

You haven't accomplished, or risked, anything if you haven't made the other party aware of your intentions. But the point you are stubbornly refusing to acknowledge has even been made is that from her perspective and in her own mind she has absolutely "made the other party aware of your intentions.” If a man is either too timid or just too dumb to understand the cues that are being sent his way that is not necessarily her fault - or, actually, to be more precise it is at least as much his fault …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:05 PM
0

I wondered in a desultory way how you’d managed to deal with this ... Feminists say the opposite. Which ones? Which ones precisely? Quite apart from the fact that you’ve ignored polyamory, amongst a whole host of other things anyway, you’ve completely missed the wider point on which you are in absolute agreement with Feminism: that Patriarchy controls female sexuality and sexual expression. Whether that expression includes polygamy or not is wholly irrelevant to the underlying premise of your st…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:12 AM
0

You said women wanted polygamy - True or False? True You said "Patriarchy outlaws polygamy and enforces monogamy.” - True or False? True Therefore you agree with Feminists and Feminism that Patriarchy oppresses women by controlling their sexual desires.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:48 AM
0

Monogamy gives every single male a chance for a fulfilling family life, which is actually a males ultimate ambition. This is an interesting point. I can strongly recommend this video for you. Are you talking about the red pill or those lesbian seperatists who hate male to female transsexuals? TERP with a ‘P’ refers to subscribers to r/TheRedPill; TERF with an ‘F’ is a Feminist who refuses to accept transwomen as women. I am a little into TRP and a bit more into MGTOW I have some sympathy with so…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:44 AM
1

No, that's not at all what I'm saying. Ah, my bad then - apologies. Although I should point out that if someone is to say "Feelings matter not a jot in the face of facts.” in the particular context of this thread, then it does strongly suggest that to oppose feelings against facts (and find the latter wanting) that you might well have been referring to something along Evo.-Psych. lines. I'm saying that it doesn't matter if women feel like they're getting rejected if they're not doing anything. W…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:36 AM
1

So its the OPPOSITE of what feminists believe. No, it isn’t - by your own admission and in your own words you have literally just said that women "wanted polygamy” but: Patriarchy actually outlawed polygamy or at least greatly discouraged it So in other words, you wholly in agreement with Feminists on three key points: 1 There is such a thing as Patriarchy and that we live under a system controlled by it; 2 A key feature of Patriarchy is that it oppresses women, preventing them from having the a…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:17 AM
1

Then along came patriarchy within the past 10,000 years mostly spearheaded by religion. This was an attempt to regulate the sexual marketplace and ensure ever man found a wife. So you agree with Feminism that for the duration of civilisation that civilisation has been male and Patriarchal? And you also have a similarly prelapsarian faith in the notion that before the rise of settled civilisations, societies were more egalitarian? What to do with a volatile tribal population you've jut conquered?…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:28 AM
1

It's the differences, not the similarities, we're talking about. No actually - that may be what you’re talking about, but it isn’t what I have been saying. Because you're reading wrongly into what I wrote. Only because you did not qualify the statement more clearly - you have now, which is fine of course. But before it was left open to suggest that all or at least the greater part of the choice in selection was in the hands of women, not men. This after all was how the whole thread began when I …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:20 AM
1

Then what are you doing? You need to read up thread with the other guy who I was corresponding with to see the answer to that question.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:13 AM
1

Feelings matter not a jot in the face of facts. Well, as I’ve just explained, actually in this case they do because if the subject under discussion is psychology then it is precisely the case that feelings are the facts that we are trying to discuss. What I presume you are trying to say is that observable behaviours have deep biological roots driving them - that may well be the case, but regardless the behaviours that are observable include the fact that if a woman desires a man who turns her do…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:01 AM
1

pretending that our biggest issue is old social roles Oh, well there I think I would agree with you (and hence why I originally made reference to rolling my eyes at certain of the lines in that piece).
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:55 AM
1

LOL. … LOL2 Well, I’m ever so glad to have been the source of so much amusement for you ; - ) … silly people like KrisK still try to justify it with … This lady's a real KrisK in the making, real potential. Thank you for just assuming to know what I think about this or that or anything else as it’s always so much less of a burden to make an argument than to watch someone else make it for you. You know a lot of people claim that calling ‘straw man’ is often over used, but in this case as you have…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:53 AM
1

There is only a single line of evidence we need to show women have the power in mating. The fact that in our deep past for every ten women who reproduced, only one man did. Explain to me why this isn’t the very definition of a Patriarchal system as Feminists describe, in which a small elite of ‘superior’ men (taller, stronger, smarter etc.) dominate whatever social group they are in, having a harem of women and exploiting or abusing the other men who are shorter, weaker, less intelligent for the…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:34 AM
0

if the worst thing she can envision for men is that they have to struggle with antiquated social roles that no longer apply, she's missing the forest for the trees. So you can see nothing positive in the tone of that piece at all? Nothing to be optimistic about? Because to me there is a glimmer of optimism there that suggests here is a woman who, yes she trots out the patriarchy hurts men too rubbish (i.e. the “[p]opular uses of feminist frameworks[‘] … goes ... for masculinity” bit), but what I…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:20 AM
2

I couldn't believe she thought that sending him a "man up" message would somehow lift his spirits. Jesus H. Christ, What part of I cringe at myself and I wrote without thought do you not understand? I recently texted my middle-of-the-night companion about some plans. And I cringe at myself – not him – when I recall the exchange. I was waiting for him to make a decision, I frustratedly texted him to pick a time and stick to it. “Man up,” I wrote without thought.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:15 AM
0

Oh, don’t be so ridiculous it was so obviously chosen as a deliberately simple set of numbers to get the point across. To say "The mistake you're making …” is to seriously misread what was being done.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:06 AM
0

you don't seem to be aware of the difference in how the sexes evaluate partners Well … perhaps … but by the same token you don’t seem to be willing to acknowledge the similarities or even, apparently, the possibility that there might be any at all. This "powerful attraction" tends to be far more selective than it is for men. Why do you appear to think sex selectivity is only a one-way street? Why, for instance, is this woman deemed more desirable than this one? You're projecting women's experien…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:03 AM
1

Jesus you haven’t taken on board a single thing I’ve said have you? I don’t mind being disagreed with - that would be fine - but you’re not even showing any sign of having understood the point I’ve made repeatedly so we might as well call it a night. And by the way, you really don’t have a grasp of what scientific objectivity means as the definition you’ve cited makes absolutely crystal clear.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:33 PM
1

Do you know what it's called when you judge women and men's behavior standards the same way? EQUALITY. You’re not putting words in my mouth but what you are doing is being incredibly disingenuous by having shifted the whole ground from how men and women deal with romantic rejection - the topic we were actually discussing - to equality overall. If you want to discuss equality in work and elsewhere, fine, but that’s a different conversation from the one we’ve just been having which you can see her…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:30 PM
1

You really don’t understand what ‘objective' means.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:16 PM
1

It is a scientific fact. I don’t know which is the more abused - the notion of ‘science’ or the word ‘fact’.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:15 PM
1

But this is about facts, not feelings. Well actually it’s about the facts of how people feel, in particular how women, not men, experience it from their perspective. It’s exasperating to keep having to say that I know what it feels like as a man to be rejected, but I’m trying to open up the possibility of seeing it from the other side for a change.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:13 PM
5

It would be very easy to dismiss this and I admit I did roll my eyes and tut at the bit that went “[p]opular uses of feminist frameworks[‘] … gender questioning goes as much for masculinity as it does femininity.” But actually if you read to the end the author is making a real effort to actually think outside those same “[p]opular feminist frameworks”: He was living hand-to-mouth, month-to-month, and felt stuck. And suddenly, as he was embarking into his very early thirties, this, he realized, w…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:11 PM
1

Then her perspective is wrong. Blimey, you’re confident. Giving someone a "please talk to me" look and then looking away isn't the same as … But the whole point is she thinks it is from her perspective. I know you don’t think it’s the same thing and for that matter neither did I for a long time, but if she does then she will react to someone not picking up that cue as if she has been rebuffed just as you do if you get BTFO by a woman in a bar you just tried to strike up a conversation with. The …
/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:52 PM
1

This does happen. Sometimes. But it is incredibly rare. It’s only incredibly rare because you are taking an incredibly narrow perspective that, crucially, doesn’t appear to include women from a woman’s perspective. Just look at the OKCupid stats ... if you don't believe me. OK Cupid? Really? Does Harvard need to be worried? ; - ) … sorry, I’m being flip there, but OK let’s just say for sake of argument that the stats from OK Cupid are absolutely correct - if that’s the case then that not only do…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:42 PM
3

Whether they realise they have the power or not, they do because they are the one's who decide. OK I’m going to try and change tack because otherwise we’ll just end up repeating the same points we’ve both already made; with that in mind then: How do you account for what you say is the case that some women don’t realise they have this power you claim is an “objective” reality? How has it apparently escaped their notice that they have this power of veto over men that you have attributed to them? A…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:43 PM
7

That said, I am getting sick and disgusted with the pro Marxist posts on here. Umm, like when? I’ve been between jobs the last couple of weeks and so have been on this subreddit a lot lately and I can honestly say I’ve never once seen any pro-Marxist posts. Have you any links because I’m genuinely lost as to what you mean?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:21 PM
1

And why do you think she doesn't just go and strike up the conversation herself? With respect, you’re kind of missing the point I’m trying to make which is that from her perspective this is equivalent to making a move whether or not you (or most men) recognise it or not. Because she doesn't have to. She can give signals while maintaining plausible deniability. He cannot. Really you think so? I think you need to see how women behave around a man that makes them lose their mind. If the attraction …
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:16 PM
1

Well at least you have some. I remain personally doubtful about that, but I’ll concede the point for now at least.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:07 PM
3

Unless you think that what I said about the male being the pursuer is incorrect, No, what I said was: Do you not see that what you’ve done there is to describe the experience solely from the male perspective without taking into account how the same situation might look from the female side? i.e. that you’re description is incomplete because it’s one-sided. As it is one-sided it cannot therefore be, as you claimed it was: an external objective view of what happens in practice. That is literally i…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:58 PM
0

men have higher sex drive Proof?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:35 PM
-3

I've provided an external objective view of what happens in practice. No, you haven’t. I know you think you have … but you really haven’t. And before this sounds like one of those agree-to-disagree things it’s not because in you’re own words you’ve just said: Also, yes [is a very one-sided view], but not without justification. So having admitted that you’re taking this from only the male perspective you can’t at the same time also claim to be viewing it through an objective lens as if you’ve unc…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:43 PM
2

Because they don’t understand the distinction between TRP (The Red Pill) as a loose movement and anyone else who uses the red pill as a short-hand for give me the low-down on X, Y, Z. I mean if you look around (especially on somewhere like 4Chan) you’ll see posters say things like “Red Pill me on the Yugoslavian Civil War” or “Red Pill me on Milton Friedman” or whatever - in other words, politics, economics and etc. etc. The adjective ‘red-pilled’ in Internet slang also just means anyone who’s k…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:39 PM
-5

Only at the micro level. At the macro level … Do you mean a specific individual (micro) versus individuals on aggregate (the class of all women - macro)? … they are in the power position because they are the one who chooses whether the advance is accepted or rejected. This is a very one-sided view of a dynamic that involves (at least) two participants, though isn’t it? Do you not see that what you’ve done there is to describe the experience solely from the male perspective without taking into ac…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:28 PM
-6

Women are in the power position in courtship … I think that rather depends on who it is they are courting, don’t you?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:51 PM
5

Well, that’s great congratulations to you and your wife. But are you aware that in the UK the average age to get divorced is in the early to mid-40s (see below) and that figures for other western countries, e.g. US, Canada and Australia, are more or less the same? The average ages for men and women getting divorced are 44.7 and 42.2 respectively. The ages have been consistently getting older for the past 30 years. So in other words, I wouldn’t say they fit either your category [1] or your catego…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:44 PM
1

And you’re how old may I ask? You can give a ballpark if you’d prefer not to give your precise age.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 03:59 PM
54

The pair had an argument and Jones was upset, so decided to make her eleventh fabricated allegation of rape, he added. This really highlights a big problem for me with the 'listen and believe’ crowd - they are, ironically, generally quite privileged and are often educated to university level and are in professional occupations. What they fail to understand (apparently anyway) is just how chaotic the lives of some people from less privileged backgrounds are and the extent to which they contribute…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 03:46 PM
1

So in other words, she's mid-40's, single, and still trying to attract men. Why’s that a problem? It’s not like it seals itself up as soon as the candles go out on the 40th birthday cake, is it?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:45 PM
9

Literally the first Q & A is this: Q: In your memoir, ‘‘Love, Loss and What We Ate,’’ you write that foods are like men: ‘‘Some are good, some are bad and some are O.K. only in small doses. But most should be tried at least once.’’ Which of the two prompts more regret when you’ve made a bad choice? A: I don’t have any regrets, thankfully. I don’t even regret trying tripe. But I think human beings do way more damage to each other than anything you can cook in a pot. I don’t think anyone need lose…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:43 PM
4

How many cats does she have and which one does she think she’s married to?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:35 AM
3

Why does this subreddit feel so much like /r/TheRedPill? Because sometimes they come here on what I can only imagine they think of as ‘recruitment drives’ and stink the place up with their ‘All you MRAs are Beta cucks that just need take steroids and get laid more often’. This site is open and has a wide tolerance for assholes to wander in and give their own ignorant-ass opinions on whatever happened to pass through their mind that morning while they were on the shitter. Hence why you’re here … …
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:30 AM
55

Presumably most of the women doing all the whooping and hollering and giving Lorena a standing ovation are straight, and most of those women are also presumably in a relationship with a man now? Interesting.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:03 AM
1

it's like those stupid occupy wall street protestors who go "We are the 99%" and I go "No you're fucking not” Heh. OK, I think I’m starting to see where you’re coming from now - I’m still not sure the report in the story’s a bitch though. I think journalists who write these articles know that if they push it too much people will get outraged which is why they lighten up on their rhetoric so more patient people like you think it's an improvement. Possibly … it really depends on the MSM outlet tho…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 09:07 PM
1

what is saving these 10% from abuse? How can we use that knowledge to protect the rest of the population? I mean without further information I can’t simply rule out that it wasn’t pure luck that meant that 1 in 10 was left unmolested … but seriously, think about it: Hypothetically, you are sharing a space with 10 other people, 9 of whom are being abused and yet you are not - how is that possible? And what impact would that have on a child’s psychology, especially one that was intellectually disa…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 09:00 PM
0

… to me it seems they're still trying to control the narrative. Well, I suppose in one sense at least that is actually literally true as that is what journalists do for a living, but I know what you’re trying to say there. Pulling that line out of her arse for example right after her own camera crew had been attacked, is pretty ridiculous. Well, I guess - but you do realise she doesn’t mean an actual statistical 99% but instead she’s just using it as a figurative way of saying ‘almost all’? She …
/r/MensRights20/03/16 03:17 PM
1

I hate to say this when I know for a fact that intellectually disabled people are extremely vulnerable to a wide range of abuses, especially within residential and institutional care, but also in the wider community if they live independently … but that said … 90 per cent of intellectually disabled women in Australia have been sexually abused. Read that again. Ninety per cent. I did read it again and it raises a whole host of questions that I’m disappointed to see the journalist didn’t bother to…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 03:08 PM
3

She and the other people commenting on her are acting as if she's somehow brave for knowing that because she's a woman those refugees wouldn't do anything to her while the men around her are all getting attacked. I appreciate the time you took to respond, but … I’ve just read the article a second time more carefully and I really don’t get what line or paragraph you’ve read to come to this conclusion (or the original one, that she’s a bitch) it's like if I went and tried talking to a bunch of act…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:56 PM
1

Wait, what? Why is she a bitch?!? how long it's going to take for these sorts of reporters to finally admit their governments made a big fucking mistake letting this many refugees in at once Isn’t she an Australian doing a report from Sweden?
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:24 PM
3

Looked reasonable enough to me as far as I could tell.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 10:03 AM
8

It would … but then what kind of a schmuck smugly says “Happy to oblige” when banning someone?
/r/MensRights20/03/16 08:16 AM
2

Now Jones hopes to leverage her earthquake credentials to tackle even more ambitious projects. She's retiring from the USGS this month to help officials develop science-based policies related to climate change, tsunamis and other kinds of natural disasters. If she was going off to join NOW or something then I could see the point, but as she’s not … what point are you trying to make with this? Is it about all the stuff like this?: But science, apparently, was for boys. Instead of celebrating Jone…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 08:15 AM
18

“invalidation” What a load of shite. Also, you realise what they were actually prohibiting was the acronym FTFY? I mean FFS.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 08:04 AM
1

No, because I wasn’t answering the original question - now fuck off.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 06:23 AM
1

My message could've should have gone to the person before FTFY
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:15 AM
1

Thanks for this response! Much appreciated.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:14 AM
7

To be fair, before downvoting this user you should check out someone like Leeds Rhino’s (rugby league) Rob Burrow. He is only 5’5” (c. 1.65m) and weighs about 150 lbs (c. 70kg) playing an extremely demanding physically aggressive sport with men of vastly greater body mass, stature etc. and yet he is an absolutely fearless player and tenacious to boot. To be frank, he’s absolutely fucking mental and so size alone isn’t necessarily the only factor involved in physical courage and nerve, important …
/r/MensRights19/03/16 08:38 PM
2

I'm concerned that you don't care that the true facts are not reflected in the headline, at all. What on Earth are you talking about? Which headline? The Daily Mail’s? The thread’s? What? Also what on Earth is a ‘true fact’ as opposed to a ‘fact’? Are there ‘false facts’ anywhere? Some how I think not. If you want this sub Reddit to only be an echo chamber of made up crap, or Tumblr style anecdotes, … Just what is this supposed to mean? I listed a series of quotes all from articles linked to by …
/r/MensRights19/03/16 08:06 PM
1

Got it - wasn’t aware it had its own name. Thanks.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 08:00 PM
5

Tone of first paragraph treats whole thing as a bit of a joke. Classy.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 10:03 AM
3

Metro Saturday 15 Nov 2014: ‘Revenge porn’, or ‘involuntary porn’, can have a hugely detrimental impact on victims – 90 per cent of whom are female. Daily Mail 18 March 2016 Laura Higgins, operations manager for the South West Grid for Learning's Revenge Porn Helpline, said … 75 per cent of the calls they receive are made by women. BBC News 19 August 2015: edit [Man]: A man has been jailed for 16 weeks for posting sexually explicit photographs of a woman on social media [ …] In April, it became …
/r/MensRights19/03/16 08:39 AM
1

Have you got any good links that summarise the "predominant aggressor doctrine”? (I mean I’ve Googled it, but lots have come up so if you’ve got something that gives a good, critical overview etc. that would be much appreciated - no worries if not, obviously, cheers in advance).
/r/MensRights19/03/16 08:26 AM
1

NP it and also I don’t buy it - this is someone trying out women’s erotic fan fic. - I mean it’s so long and this? This is bodice-ripping at it’s best/worst/cheesiest: “Do you want more,” I asked as seductively as I could, leaning in close to his neck and ear. He turned his head, exposing his neck further, and let out a breath. I kissed his neck, then lightly bit him where his neck meets his shoulders, earning myself another moan.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 08:20 AM
4

I haven’t been following this case - that link describes it perfectly. Thanks.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 08:13 AM
2

I don’t mean to sound like a pain in the ass, but as u/iainmf has already given a good answer can I just quickly add that it’s generally not a good idea to go around insisting on ‘debunking’ everything all the time - that kind of attitude or mindset is the one that ensures confirmation bias and it’s that kind of attitude that many Feminists bring to the table. In short, there is no argument about the existence of a wage gap, the issue is firstly where the gap exists (can’t speak for Australia, b…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 07:49 AM
1

Oh, I see - I got confused at the reference as I thought Crow was about segregation. That makes sense now though.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 08:12 PM
3

I do get to your question if you have the patience for it, but first: Women have been favored by medieval dowry laws, charities, and welfare systems. They were? Favoured how? … a woman was free to either work for wages or stay at home. Hm, pretty sure that’s not true otherwise you wouldn’t have had women factory hands all through the industrial revolution, for example. … the cornerstone of all current feminist apologetics. I think that’s possibly stretching it a bit to say it’s the cornerstone, …
/r/MensRights18/03/16 08:11 PM
1

It is?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:59 PM
2

Heh : - ))
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:54 PM
1

OK, imagine there are 10 potatoes and … oh, damn wait that’s [not] going to work, is it?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 02:13 PM
1

Are you having a laugh? What’s not to get?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:20 PM
2

The problem with this is that it doesn't stop people digging in their [heels], as to them, their theory is still coherent. I think you’re missing a vital point here - in most cases, and whether or consciously or not (and often it’s not), they are activists who see the ends as so important that any means available to them are thereby justified. Being coherent is less important than ‘winning’ and/or crushing any and all opposition by any means necessary. So you’re first mistake appears to be in as…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:19 PM
1

You don’t get why it’s "irritating, fatuous nonsense” or you just don’t get it at all?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:02 PM
14

That’s just the same as the bowl of M & Ms thing. It’s irritating, fatuous nonsense.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:50 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:57 AM
1

They will go to the scene of a car accident or house fire specifically for that reason. Blimey, they’re a bit avant garde ...
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:56 AM
2

This is such a good series. Essential viewing.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 08:45 PM
2

When it is you in a car with two police officers … Not only are the Officers in a position of power, … Let’s be clear if it isn’t already, I am not only not defending the actions of the two officers, but actively criticising them … but … that said, the thing about power cuts both ways. Uniformed men and women are, for whatever reason, a common fantasy of sorts - this needs to be understood in the context that heterosexual women have, by and large at least, an attraction to men serving in the arm…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:46 PM
1

The revelation of the woman’s name (or not) is an issue, but not the one I was discussing - that’s a discussion worth having, but not here (or at least not specifically related to my comment).
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:22 PM
2

Ha ha ha ha ; - )
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:15 PM
44

I don’t know who down voted u/MalibuStayZ, but they are right and the headline is a bit misleading (compare with Mark Pearson’s experience where the anonymous actress completely fabricated the incident). These were two on-duty police officers, so they should not have been engaged in sex with a drunk woman in the middle of the night. No, it’s not rape and it’s not clear why - shame maybe? - she decided to accuse them, but none of that detracts from the fact that serving police officers should not…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 08:21 AM
1

True.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:20 AM
4

Oh Lord … you know, I’ve just realised these comments could end up as part of the marketing for the show - Can you imagine it? Killjoy - the new comedy for pissed off womyn. So funny, MRAs said … X … Y …. Z Shiiit.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:09 AM
9

I’m confused … the purpose of that slot is to make people actually want to see more of this? Um ...
/r/MensRights16/03/16 10:06 PM
1

Those sex ratio numbers are just ridiculous. I’m sure you’re right, but I’m still fairly certain that even if they were accurate her comments about them would be no less daft.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:59 PM
1

Then I’ve already answered it in other comments in this thread if you want to look.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 03:09 PM
22

I see two options here: Either Watson is giving us a moral version of bait-and-switch in which she presents us with developing world statistics in order to push a completely unrelated first world agenda (such as quotas for judges, politicians etc.) that won’t make one whit of difference to the lives of women in poor countries or ... Watson is unbelievably dumb and can’t manage to joint the dots of what she’s actually saying or how it inevitably conflicts with Feminist and Intersectional Feminist…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 02:46 PM
6

all female flight crews Doesn’t this just mean that specific planes have an all-female crew, not that all-female crew are standard? i.e. if across the entire airline there is a mix of all-male, male-female, and all-female crews then it doesn’t breach any regulation I can think of.* So why is there different treatment in all female crews? Because it’s thought to be good publicity - in case you hadn’t noticed, Feminism is making a lot of people very rich. *If you do find the answer, let me know ho…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 12:08 PM
4

"The majority of our rapes — not to say that we don't have rapes, we do — but the majority of our rapes that are called in are actually consensual sex.” Whether Rowland is able to support this claim with statistical evidence for Bingham County or not, he should really have found a more diplomatic way of saying this because ... Bingham County Sheriff Craig Rowland made the comments Monday If it’s Wednesday now, I reckon that’ll put him out of a job by this Friday.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:39 AM
1

Yes, but only if they don’t get caught in the act.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:15 AM
1

I thought these things had a 1,000 word limit ; - )) Okay, this one is just flatout retarded on so many levels. You reduced to one? Bonza mate! I suppose I shouldn't expect much consistency and validity from Everydayfeminism, ... That you should not. And yes, I suppose it is low-hanging fruit, but on the other hand if these dumb-asses are going to place the fruit so low as to plucked by those passing by in the first place ... … especially since the related articles were all about racism - not se…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:15 AM
1

Is that a serious question?
/r/MensRights16/03/16 07:10 AM
1

Yes, Yes and in a democracy, ideally, Yes.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 06:49 AM
2

How would you define toxic, gendered behaviour? / If you concede the possibility of toxic, gendered behaviour, … It’s a concept I find very hard to take seriously - in fact, it’s not really a concept at all just a handy pejorative that so long as it’s attached to a man of some description it can be applied to pretty much anything one dislikes at any one time without any need to be especially consistent in its application. Also, if you accept the idea that all behaviour is the product of a social…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 12:19 AM
2

Puh-ha-ha-ha-ha ROFLMAO! Yes, but I think she looks like this normally ...
/r/MensRights15/03/16 11:26 PM
2

I'm surprised she isn't talking about the lizard people … There might be a reason why she avoids talking about intergalactic lizards wearing people suits …
/r/MensRights15/03/16 11:16 PM
1

Or something. Well as Proudman should well know - and very likely does, but prefers not to mention it for not fitting her narrative - the reason marital rape took so long to be accepted in Law was over very genuine concerns about edit [whether or not] the Courts could make effective judgments in such cases. If there is no physical evidence and if there are no witnesses and if a husband and wife who are still living together may reasonably be expected to have conjugal relations then serious quest…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 11:14 PM
6

Her sexism and irrational biases disqualify her from consideration. Well, did you notice this line (emphasis added): I chose to practise law as a barrister because I wanted to support feminists in erasing discriminatory laws against women. I soon realised that this is almost impossible within a legal system infused with sexism. The hubris on this woman is just unbearable - I’m not against change in principle - some laws are stupid - but what the hell is this arrogant little shit doing running ar…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:09 PM
4

Notice that in contrast to articles about sexual harassment of women, there are no interviews or comments from legal experts, politicians, trade union officials or literally anyone else … it’s practically a cut and paste job with a couple of Stock Library photos thrown in ...
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:20 PM
1

Oh yeah, [sorry] I always forget to do that. My bad.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:16 PM
3

Yep. As she puts it: Men account for around 87% of Queen’s Counsel, 76% of judges, and 11 out of 12 supreme court justices. […] Prior to 2003, women were invisible and had no adjudicating voice in the most senior court of our country […] It is a travesty because it results in numerous anti-women biases in British law. And do you want to know the best part? Her specialism in the Law is as a family law junior. She also says: Just 25 years ago marital rape was lawful. The law viewed wives as the su…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:16 PM
3

I think it is really worth remembering just what kind of a spectacular clown this overbearingly arrogant 28 year-old woman is bearing in mind that her greatest achievement to date - well apart from all the cringe worthy self-publicity of course - is, as Legal Cheek explains, her: brilliant use of her computer’s screenshot function, followed by her rapid dissemination of the image on Twitter It’s also worth noting these other comments from the same source: [Her LinkedIn message Tweet] was a terri…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:04 PM
1

Careful she could probably find some charge against you for that …
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:55 PM
1

that right there is why I chose to disengage from the discussion with you Actually, no - the reason was that you were upset at the idea that you would be obstructing the investigation and thereby endangering other members of your community by your stubborn refusal to assist the police in the way they want.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:49 PM
1

There is a school of thought here that suggests that a REQUEST from police is more than a request. Well clearly that is the case, yes, as that’s why the men are allowed to refuse but if they do so then "A court would then have to rule on this.” There has to be probable cause for a police officer at ask you to provide evidence. The article in the link at the top of the thread is too lacking in detail to be sure - I have assumed that they do have good grounds for doing this. It’s not so much that …
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:26 PM
1

OK then, from the story it is evident that have the perpetrator’s DNA hence the reason for the request. So riddle me this: You’re a police detective at the head of an investigation. There is a victim of a violent rape who is now paralysed - this is the kind of opportunistic blitz attack that strongly implicates a serial attacker - either he’s attacked before and not been discovered or he’s certain to want to do this again in the future. The only thing you have to go on is the environment and a v…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:15 PM
2

The comment I made to someone else was this: A second issue, not mentioned above, but worth raising now, is having legal representation familiar with the type of testing used that I would agree to so that contamination / misinterpretation would not be an issue. In fact, now I think about it, there should be an option for a suspect of this kind to arrange for their own test to be done through an approved testing centre after which they could submit the results to the police as required.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 04:35 PM
1

Fine then you have this option then don’t you: The men in question are allowed to refuse to give their DNA. A court would then have to rule on this.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 04:34 PM
1

What? No, you receive a court order “requesting” a DNA test which you are allowed to refuse as part of an investigation into a vicious crime. Your response - skip town and leave the country for a couple of months. That means that even when given the opportunity to decline the DNA test by the court order, you decided to escape over the border. You are Julian Assange at this point and unless you’ve got good friends in the Ecuadorean Embassy in Zagreb who are willing to let you stay there indefinit…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:14 AM
1

An international manhunt? Interpol? You’ve overdramatised it by calling it a manhunt - it’s not a movie - but if you’re a suspect and you’ve absconded out of the country then yes, you will be listed as a suspect on Interpol and if found arrested and returned back to your country of origin. What's their reasoning? You ran away after being given a court order to be DNA tested so that you could be dismissed as a suspect from their enquiry. We tested several hundred other people who live in the vici…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:03 AM
4

Well, OK I think ‘victim’ probably was the wrong word there and you’re right that there are definitely quite a few little Hitlers in that profession. However, I’ve had friends in the past who were social workers and so I’ve seen a glimpse of what it’s like from the other side. I think it’s telling that both of them quit their jobs because they just couldn’t stand the bullshit involved any more. In fact, that probably tells you a lot that the good ones quit and so (presumably) the bad ones stay b…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:59 AM
1

Really? You surprise me based on the previous comments. You should give The Fountainhead a go - you’d be sure to find someting in there you like.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:56 AM
1

Who cares? You’re not a fan of Ayn Rand by any chance are you?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:50 AM
3

Heh ; - )
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:49 AM
1

Doubt it would come to that. Why?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:49 AM
6

To be fair, I imagine the woman does - social workers are often as much a victim of the system as the people they supposedly are there to protect so tied up in red tape are they. But I agree it’s a sign of a dysfunctional system - see e.g. Rotherham in the UK for a different but not wholly unrelated tragedy of bureaucracy.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:49 AM
3

Interesting response … in general, how do you feel about your relationship with your wider community? I understand the point about being innocent, but presumably you also understand that (a) the police don’t yet know this and (b) presumably the actual rapist is also claiming to be innocent as well? In which case, there are 372 possible suspects all of whom claim to be innocent. Now let’s say this - say you, and two other guys all "skip town a[nd] leave the country for several months”. All you th…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:56 AM
1

Which ones? The court, you mean?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:39 AM
0

I appreciate how clever you think that must sound - what with the references to Orwell and everything - but which would you rather? Being asked to take part in an identity parade, where the margin of error is considerable, being fitted up by the police because they don’t like your attitude, or being definitely cleared because your DNA does not match the DNA of the actual perpetrator? My earlier comment was unambiguous in that "If it was possible for them to make use of the swab for that particul…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:38 AM
1

Fine, then you would be "allowed to refuse to give [your] DNA. A court would then have to rule on this."
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:28 AM
1

Why bother? Because a young woman was jumped by a piece of shit rapist who’s left her paralysed - I’d want the fuck caught and banged up and this might help catch him.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 11:00 PM
1

Looks like it, yes.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 09:54 PM
5

if you understand what a bad deal men get in society, why not disengage from it? For example, if getting married and having children is insecure and disappointing, how about just not doing it? As u/SporkTornado’s pointed out below, there is a kind of loosely organised subculture called MGTOW (Men Going There Own Way) that are already advocating for doing just that - although there’s a very wide range of opinions as to how they interpret just what that means. But a question for you - do you think…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:58 PM
4

The article in the link says: The men in question are allowed to refuse to give their DNA. A court would then have to rule on this. I suppose it is intrusive, but it was a really vicious attack. What would I do if I were in there shoes? Honestly, I imagine I would agree to it, but my concern would be what they would do with the information after I was cleared. In the UK, my understanding is that once the police have swabbed you, your details go into the National database and they stay there rega…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:01 PM
51

Kreuscher says he showed the video [of evidence that the boy’s mother had been punching their son on the arm] to a case worker, who came to visit his home shortly after. However, the case worker reportedly told the concerned father that there wasn't much she could do. 'And she stood in front of me and pointed at my closet and said, "Unless your kid's being stuck in a closet every day or beaten every day, I'm not going to do anything about it, and if you call back, if I hear back from you about t…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:26 PM
7

What’s the difference? Only one of them is real.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:17 PM
2

And what conclusions do you draw from this discovery?
/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:16 PM
2

“ … we may have felt even more empathy than most people because we had also experienced many threats, including a bomb threat.” Excellent quote. As I say, I hope McCarrick knows what she’s let herself in for. Perhaps we should tell Amanda Hess about this? After all, as she says herself of her own experience of online harassment: None of this makes me exceptional. It just makes me a woman with an Internet connection. Here’s just a sampling of the noxious online commentary directed at other women …
/r/MensRights14/03/16 04:19 PM
5

Indeed, the notion that women could also be perpetrators was so controversial that early researchers discussing this received death threats (Straus, 1999). Someone should probably explain that point to the usual suspects (Ford, Criado-Perez, Penny, Bates, Sarkeesian, Wu and others). The aggressive dynamics playing out between researchers and campaigners appear to be a repetition of the aggressive relationship dynamics of the very subjects they were campaigning for. That. Also this: The criminal …
/r/MensRights14/03/16 02:18 PM
10

"A lot of people branded me guilty without even a presumption of innocence beforehand," he said. […] "Mr El Masri has been totally exonerated," his lawyer Chris Murphy said outside court. "And he hasn't been exonerated because somebody dropped off or something happened. The police have examined the evidence. There is overwhelming forensic evidence that shows his innocence." […] "Instead of waiting for the law to decide, the NRL's actions branded Hazem guilty in the court of public opinion.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 01:51 PM
58

Let me get some MRAs in here, 'cos I know like 12 and I'm not afraid to use ‘em Ha ha ha ha.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 01:44 PM
6

Well, of course yes. Erin Pizzey has been trying to explain this since at least 1971 - see here where she explains: I had been expelled from the newly emerging Women’s Liberation Movement as, from the beginning, I denounced it as fraudulent for deluding desperate women across the country into parting with [a significant amount of money] to join a movement which promised to devote itself to the betterment of women everywhere [but whose] main ambition was to re-educate women into believing that th…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:18 AM
2

Well as I say I’ve not read that particular paper in detail, but regardless there needs to be dozens of other papers at least all coming up with similar figures for it to really hold any water.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 06:25 AM
2

I think it should be treated with caution personally - I understand that this is the 2003 paper that’s been touted elsewhere as the source for that claim: Prevalence and psychological sequelae of self-reported childhood physical and sexual abuse in a general population sample of men and women. The original study involved mailing two types of questionnaire to 1,422 women as well as men from across the US, asking them to complete the surveys at home and then post them back to the researcher - and …
/r/MensRights12/03/16 05:24 AM
0

Pull the other one mate, it plays jingle bells. It would have been so much better if you’d just put your hands up and said “Oh, yeah, sorry, I got that one wrong” rather than cut and paste a bunch of links and throwing them at me in the hope that I’d just go "Shit! This guy’s like totally informed and stuff!” I mean seriously this is the Internet for Christ’s sake - we’re anonymous so why would you feel embarrassed to be wrong to a bunch of letters on a screen? Jesus talk about a fragile ego … O…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:25 AM
2

Got to ‘Hot’ stories on this subreddit and click on the stickied post called Thoughts on a new men's issues site - there’s a list of links there that will supply what you want.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 09:37 PM
1

Child rearing is labor, intensive and hard. I don’t recall contradicting that at any point. Of course it is. However, it is also hugely rewarding and fulfilling and adds real value and meaning to a person’s life in a way that few other things in life - even writing a best-selling novel or whatever - can compare to. At least that’s something like what many parents will tell you. I don't call it that to liken it to loss productivity but to acknowledge that it is very real and measurable work. Yes,…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 09:16 PM
1

Pretty much. In fact, while there are clearly notable exceptions in both directions, has anyone else noticed that there seems to be class divide between MRAs and Feminists? MRAs seem to tend toward middle to working class, while Feminists seem to go from middle to upper middle class - or is that just my imagination? I first noticed when I saw an article somewhere that described Paul Elam as a “truck driver” in such a sneering tone that it made it seem that this fact alone was all you needed to k…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 08:51 PM
5

I quite enjoyed reading that actually, but I’m a bit wary of anyone with the job title "life coach” as it sounds like the most unbearable first-world problem mumbo-jumbo psycho-babble horse shit ever. She’s right here about the FB post she saw: "Where the hell are all the decent men?” A simple post – and a sentiment that we've probably all heard hundreds of times before in various different forms[. But t]he simple fact is that there is no way a man could have posted a question like this about wo…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 01:15 PM
4

One should not be kept in a lower class because they do the bulk of child care. But to me your choice of language - be kept - is really my issue here. It assumes without evidence that women are oppressed / exploited in regard to the “burden” of looking after children. Please note, we are actually talking about their own children here and, by and large, not someone else’s - we’re not talking about children that have been randomly assigned to someone by the state but their own flesh and blood or t…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 01:02 PM
2

You don’t - it’s not worth the time or effort. I mean, how would a Feminist respond to a meme that said: “All Feminists are dirty filthy poo-poo with smelly bums.”? It’s puerile. Forget about it.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 09:15 AM
1

Why am I supposed to care about this exactly?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 09:12 AM
5

From the transcript: It is this pursuit, of what [Harvard professor of Economics]Claudia Goldin calls “temporal flexibility,” that Goldin sees as perhaps the most powerful explanation for the gender pay gap. As she told us, it doesn’t seem as though outright discrimination or differences in competitive drive or bargaining ability can account for much of the difference. But that need, or desire, for flexibility in the workplace leads to a split that’s very clear in the data — a split that has to …
/r/MensRights11/03/16 07:47 AM
1

I know who she is because I love comics, but not the superhero kind for the most part and I’ve never read that particular one. But quite possibly, yes.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 04:46 PM
0

Aggressive hybristophilia comprises those individuals who actively help (typically male) criminals to commit the crime(s). Such people (usually female) will (according to the LAH website): “Help out their lovers with their criminal agenda by luring victims, hiding bodies, covering crimes, or even committing crimes. They are attracted to their lover’s because of their violent actions and want to receive love, yet are unable to understand that their lover’s are psychopaths who are manipulating the…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 01:12 PM
1

I think we can say more definitely that a brain that has not developed I don’t know, can we? This is going too philosophical now, but really when does consciousness begin? We already know that alcohol, narcotics and other stimulants have a direct effect on the later mental development of a child even from the earliest weeks so what else can influence a child’s development in th womb? It may or may not be proven, but if what you says true an awful lot of parents are wasting an awful lot of time p…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:05 PM
4

Yes - sexist discrimination is everywhere. I mean what was J.K. Rowling thinking throwing her interalised misogyny at the youth of the world not calling the books Harry and Hermione and The Philosopher’s Stone?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:02 PM
1

This is a more complex issue than organ donation … Of course, yes, but there is no other phenomenon quite like it. However, the question we’re discussing is whether or not it is morally justified for a man to demand an abortion from a woman (who presumably wants to keep the baby otherwise the question wouldn’t arise). In that sense, the comparison to organ donation or fitting gastric bands is relevant even if they are different experiences. If we're going to say that the embryo exists independen…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:59 PM
1

it's a hard call It is,yes, and I take your point but at the same time they’re clearly much more than ‘just a ball of cells’ and, again, they are legitimate life forms in my opinion regardless of whether or not they can be considered ‘conscious' at those points. Compare this to a person in a vegetative state. I know what you’re trying to get at but that’s not the best example for your argument - as you no doubt know, the decision to maintain or turn off life support for someone in a vegetative s…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:26 PM
1

I’ve just replied to your other response actually, which surprised me as you’ll see. Anyway, as I said I’m not pro-life either but (again) neither do I fully subscribe to the idea that it is ‘just a ball of cells’. At the beginning, yes that’s true, but this is a photo of a foetus at six weeks which give or take is going to be the first time that someone who wasn’t planning on becoming pregnant will realise that they are. This is a foetus at 9 weeks and this is one at 13 weeks - I’ve picked 13 w…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:56 PM
0

Fuck off with your troll bullshit you faggot.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:47 PM
2

Why do you think there is no moral justification for a man to demand a woman get an abortion? You can’t be serious? Are you really so disingenuous to make me think that you have no idea why? The fact that you’ve even asked the question and added "Take me through your logic” as if you’ve just been presented by some completely outlandish theory such as you might here from a Creationist about the origins of the universe suggests already that any explanation I give no matter how elementary is going …
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:46 PM
1

Which part do I need to break the crayons out for? Swords and wooden sticks - you have gone way, way off base.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:19 PM
2

But you don't get off scott free if you pumped and dumped Assuming it’s his child. Assuming the pregnancy was an ‘accident’.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:18 PM
1

Yes, but also as long as you understand that a number of “accidental” pregnancies of the “But I wore a condom! How did that happen?” etc. are not at all accidental. The same applies to when the woman is pregnant by a man quite other than one being asked to accept paternal responsibility.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:12 PM
1

I believe it is the right of every man to tell a woman to have an abortion as much as it is a right for every woman to have an abortion herself. While I agree with you on the "her body” thing, there is still nevertheless no moral justification for a man who is not pregnant to demand a woman who is to abort a child he doesn’t want. The only reason for the "lifeless embryo” argument is to try distract the woman from accepting what it is that she is actually doing when she aborts and and assuage th…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:10 PM
1

I was just about to make a very similar point. You thus need to explain why the taxpayer should be expected to take that burden on. It becomes a case of moral hazard (especially in any case where the father is himself a long-term welfare recipient).
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:59 PM
1

What the fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:49 PM
1

And that’s why you’re acting like a child.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:48 PM
0

That truth’s a bitch, ain’t it?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:27 PM
1

You know you’re so right - fuck those at-risk fatherless kids. Having nothing it all is just so much better than teaching them basic manners and some emotional intelligence. / s
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:26 PM
0

That explains why you down voted the previous comment then.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:25 PM
19

“Whether you are a woman on a tea plantation in Kenya, or a stockbroker on Wall Street, or a Hollywood actress, no one is being paid equally.” Woah! She actually went there. Watson has a net worth of [an] estimated $70,000,000. That’s admittedly about 35% less than Daniel Radcliffe’s $110,000,000, but then again on the other hand it’s about 27% more than Rupert Grint at $51,000,000. I mean … it’s almost as if they’re paid by how important the role is to the story and not their genitalia at all, …
/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:17 PM
0

That’s some mighty straw man you’ve built up there.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 03:56 PM
1

Fucking predictive text in Reddit! Christina Hoff-Sommers …. Christ
/r/MensRights09/03/16 11:13 AM
5

I can see where you’re coming here and why this has made you angry. For example, if this situation were reversed it is all too easy to imagine the resultant Twitter and MSM shitstorm that would ensue. I mean can you imagine the Feminist rage that would ensue if a black woman had set up a “ladies’ club” in which at-risk Elementary school black girls were given rose pink or lemon yellow frilly dresses to wear with white cotton gloves and parasols and taught how to bake cakes and serve men lemonade…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 09:35 AM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:56 AM
1

Well, it’s a devastating argument … / s
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:52 AM
1

I think it’s more worrying that there probably really is a source somewhere out there for that stuff in some Gender Studies primer somewhere ...
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:19 AM
4

It doesn’t.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 07:42 PM
3

I appreciate it’s International Women’s Day so it naturally makes sense to focus on women and girls for that reason but to frame it in such a way as "toughest to be born a girl” just sounds ridiculous bordering on offensive in the context of somewhere like Somalia. It surely should have been completely possible for them to focus on women and girls without a direct reference to how they are supposedly held back from achieving better things by illustrations in school books - these are after all co…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:37 PM
6

Oh, this is just too, too absurd - from the end of the article with my emphasis: The campaign has drawn up a list of countries where it is "toughest to be born a girl”, based on criteria such as access to health and education, economic opportunities, access to a bank account and political representation. The top 10 in this ranking are: Niger, Somalia, Mali, Central African Republic, Yemen, DR Congo, Afghanistan, Cote d'Ivoire, Chad and Comoros How in the name of yellow rubbery fuck are [they] ma…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:35 PM
1

I admit that people do not like some authority figure demanding they follow some set of rules. Oh, I disagree - I’m not trying to be a pain in the arse, but my basic point is that people are not machines and it’s an outdated 1930's cliche to think of a man or woman as an automaton a la Fritz Lang’s Metropolis, Huxley’s audiosleep-programmed Deltas and Epsilons in Brave New World or [Chaplin’s] Modern Times. Some people do feel lost and seek out someone that will help give order and stability to …
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:22 PM
1

Either this is the sloppiest reporting in history or the most ridiculous error of judgement ever Well then according to you it’s sloppy reporting because they fail to give a more precise context than “at hospital” when it says: She later told police at hospital "Mm, I've done it, I killed my husband”.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 03:40 PM
1

You can't expect BLM to be against feminists when feminists are the most liberal and supportive people BLM has. That’s not what OP is suggesting, is it? In fact, OP begins: The black lives matter movement has become so entwined as to nearly be synonymous with feminism, that it's difficult to talk about one without talking about the other. His complain is precisely that BLM is currently not against Feminists, but he feels it possibly should be. Your remaining point (The idea that feminists are ha…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 08:03 AM
3

Notice that the Website is Home Office endorsed. That’s one of my biggest issues with this. I’m not a libertarian, but that doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate libertarian critiques of government and one thing they absolutely get right is that the biggest issue with edit [government-funded] bodies is that their first order of business is to justify their existence in the absence of any ‘natural predators’ in the economy. So how does a campaign like this demonstrate whether or not it’s been effective…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:25 AM
1

My point is that wherever it comes from, I will always challenge the argument that People like to be told what to think. It’s demonstrably untrue and does not apply to a single individual. ‘People’ may be ill-informed, misinformed, ignorant, lacking in awareness of this or that, inconsistent and any number of other things, but they are not and never will be ‘sheeple’ either in their own estimation of themselves or in any of the actions they take observed from the outside. At least in the first i…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:36 AM
15

Either this is the sloppiest reporting in history or the most ridiculous error of judgement ever …. I mean look at this shit - here it says: She later told police at hospital "Mm, I've done it, I killed my husband”. But later we’re told: She had no memory of the killing. On the one hand, one cause of the murder is suggested as: She had previously been prescribed antipsychotic medication but was not taking any at the time of the killing … But on the other that the judge has let her go on conditio…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:28 AM
1

People like to be told what to think. They like to follow the crowd and attack any outside opinion. You’re people too (as am I) so why isn’t that true of you (and me) too? People would rather shut down others than admit that they might be wrong. This’ll be interesting ...
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:13 AM
8

The fucking website … oh, my God … Relationships can be confusing and it can be difficult to understand what is and isn’t normal behaviour. edit [Are they taking the fucking piss?] Isn’t this edit [bit below] Duluth? Take a poll? Are verbal threats and criticism OK as long as your partner doesn’t hit you? (All responses are anonymous.) Yes Maybe No This is an absolute disaster.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:01 PM
1

Only if it works.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:54 PM
3

Extra $500 x (number of employees ) < cost of marketing a brand. But the ad was produced and is being shown in TV right? So … they would have had to have paid for the marketing in any case right? So I think the equation is actually: Extra $500 x (number of employees ) + cost of marketing a brand.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:45 PM
2

Not according to the video, but I believe you ...
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:45 PM
4

Ah, of course! All I need do is master the cognitive equivalent of a thaumatrope and I’m golden!
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:20 PM
10

Fuck! This stuff is so complicated no wonder SJWs are always depressed - they can never get anything right!
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:54 PM
0

Story is fake: Actually, no it isn’t. Or put another way, if it is, that link to her resume is not what proves it. Many wannabe actors and models regularly include media appearances (even apparently negative ones) in their resumes because it adds to their publicity profile. The only thing that resume shows is that she is utterly ruthless in her quest to become famous and - as evidence by her presence as a claimant on Judge Rinder, the UK’s low-rent version of Judge Judy, and as a contestant on t…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:39 PM
3

Now gimme my social science degree /s ROFLMAO ; - )))
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:26 PM
8

Excellent.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:58 PM
4

I've never seen studies for either Me neither - I’m not saying they’re not out there, but the argument seems flawed for this reason: If it’s true that the workforce in e.g. IT is lacking in gender diversity, then what have they based their research on to prove that having more women in say a digital start-up does increase productivity, profits etc.? edit [i.e. if those companies don’t exist then what could they have possibly based their case studies on?] And if, on the other hand, they know of I…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 11:17 AM
8

Shhh! Don’t question that statement - they have evidence and stuff … apparently …
/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:56 AM
6

OK so I laughed at the title of this thread, but this is the Daily Mail doing a edit [hit] piece on Kendall because she had a go at them in the past and those cunts never forget any kind of a slight against them and use their paper to carry out personal vendettas against public figures they dislike. Perfect example is this in the sub-heading: She called on people to 'forget mothers' and focus on aunts But this - this being the truth - tucked away down in paragraphs five and six (my emphasis): [K…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:09 AM
13

What the fuck? An extra $500 for having a vagina?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:03 AM
27

WOW! Don’t you just love Love the racist stereotyping of the Asian girl at 0’55”!?!
/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:00 AM
2

Mrs Blair launched it with much fanfare in 2012, promising to open 100 clinics within five years. In the first three years it managed to open just 11. Christ - isn’t that about the same rate Anita Sarkeesian’s been making videos?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 08:17 AM
14

Anyone know why she wanted to make it female only? To distract people from the fact the wife of the UK’s longest serving Labour Prime Minister and therefore a supposed champion of the National Health Service was setting up a business devoted to privately run health care. By making it ‘women only’ she probably thought she could fend off accusations that she was betraying social justice.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:58 AM
2

Oh, my sides this fucking story
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:55 AM
2

No, I can’t - it’s absolutely incredible that these women seem to have completely missed the very loud conversation that’s been going on over the last few years that says: The problem is that our society holds some ridiculous beliefs around how revealing clothes supposedly increase the risk of sexual assault … that’s a myth! … Clothes are not a risk factor. Apparently "The research is not ambiguous on this topic” and "It is truly exasperating” that it still needs to be pointed out that: there is…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:47 AM
1

I wasn’t trying to suggest whether it was fair or not; I was just trying to explain what (I guess) the reasoning behind it is.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:37 AM
1

umm … nothing?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:35 AM
1

the purpose of affirmative action is to extend female privilege That might be the real outcome, but it is not the intention claimed by those proposing it. it does not apply in fields where men are the minority. Yes, that’s true - but it could do in theory in which case might that mean that equality can be legislated for?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:34 AM
1

Well it was just a thought.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:30 AM
2

Well, maybe I misunderstood then. It happens.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:00 PM
28

what I needed was a sperm donor and there were plenty of these walking the streets and I could take my pick. Classy. Also, I know this guy’s not everyone’s cup of tea, but I still think this video is as good as any on a related topic. Also this shit show from just before Christmas, and now also this unconfirmed court case in which a guy is claiming that "Woman ‘begged married man for sex so she could get pregnant and stay in UK’ and where - allegedly at least - she: threatened to cry rape if he …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:53 PM
1

That, believe it or not, is my answer to "shouldn't she be required to maintain a domestic obligation to her ex-husband?” No, she shouldn’t - at least not according to the rationale outlined above. Also, why would anyone want this? Really?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:41 PM
1

If the man is required to maintain a financial obligation to his ex-wife, shouldn't she be required to maintain a domestic obligation to her ex-husband? Firstly, you’ve just separated from your wife - do you really want her coming round your new place every week? It’s bad enough being Facebook-stalked via mutual friend’s accounts let alone inviting them into your home on a regular basis … But to answer your question, I think the rationale for his obligation to her is dependent on what career she…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:34 PM
1

Why do the press not refer to these young people as boys? For some reason the first of your two links doesn’t work for me so I can’t see what you’re pointing to there, but for the second link (the original report) I imagine they’d be more likely to use a phrase like "male children” instead of “boys” because it sounds more academic and less conversational. I guess that might be more likely than an overt attempt to avoid using the word boys out of some kind of negative bias.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 09:04 PM
1

Fairness can be legislated but equality cant be. Why can’t equality be legislated? Isn’t that the purpose of affirmative action and women only scholarships and the like? Isn’t the Equal Pay act precisely the legislation of Equality? I’m partly being Devil’s Advocate here, but I’m just saying these are things that someone else might ask you for real ...
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:18 PM
14

50 years from now the Womens Lib movement has failed What? How can something that’s already succeeded have failed 50 years hence? In the Anglosphere and other Western countries at least, equal opportunities have been written into law so formally at least there is equality - something even many Feminists acknowledge - and in addition to that there are e.g. scholarships aimed at women and, in Europe though not the US (or at least not to the same extent, maternity leave, increasingly paternity leav…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:07 PM
3

Hmm, well, thank you for giving me a definition of what Patriarchy is, but that wasn’t the question. The question was - more grammatically if that helps - is Why do you think there is a Patriarchy? (not What does it mean?). What also might be helpful are these questions: What do you mean by power, dominion and privilege and what makes you think this can be ascribed exclusively to men as opposed to men and women? What do you mean by societal and cultural norms? Is this in the sense that Bourdieu …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:16 PM
3

So do I - that’s a really, well-made and funny movie. I’ve seen it twice. On the evidence of the trailer, this Ghostbusters reboot looks like being absolute toilet. Luckily though, if it fails - which to be honest is looking very likel right now - they can always blame threads exactly like this one rather than the fact that it was an ill-conceived piece of shit no one wanted to watch.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:07 PM
6

I'm kind of new to MRA but have done a gender studies class at university. OK then, you think there is a Patriarchy? Why?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:01 PM
3

Why? Because showing emotion and openly talking about your feelings is seen as feminine, and men don't want to feel feminine because society, patriarchy whatever you want to call it, views femininity as wrong. That must be it! / s
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:00 PM
1

Oh they hurt so much, ohhh…. Good come back / s
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:55 PM
1

I mean to tell you the truth I didn't really get owned as much as I lost … And yeah, never been hit before college. Then you really ought to be ashamed of yourself for saying something as dumb as “I like to fucking fight, and I’m done being ashamed about it.” All the most successful fighters in the world, pretty much without exception, were people who took repeated poundings - and I’m talking the kind of pounding that feels like drowning, that you feel yourself going down and you can see it happ…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 02:02 PM
1

Yeah, yeah fuck you
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:52 PM
0

Why don't swiveling little nobs like you grow a pair and learn there's more to the world than articles and the internet. You’re on the Internet now so … maybe you tell me you fucking twat?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:51 PM
0

Sorry I posted in the wrong place, jesus, you win “I like to fucking fight, and I'm done being ashamed about it.” You can’t even a fight on the fucking internet you fucking nonce and you really expected people to believe you like fighting?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:49 PM
1

It says in the title… It doesn't have to do with legal rights Then you’re in the wrong fucking place really then, aren’t you? Like this one time this drunk anti-semite came into my room and fucked my guitar up. I told him he was gonna pay for it. He said "Nah, I don't feel like it". I fought him, he owned me. But the feeling of taking a fucking stand … was incredibly empowering … This is how I know you’re lying and you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about. Really, the first time you go…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:47 PM
1

Figured this would be a good place to find guys that could relate. Why not The Red Pill then? That is all about Alpha male dominance and all that kind of thing - they would absolutely love you over there. Better still - why not 4Chan /pol/? Now there you will absolutely find a receptive audience. Is it the lying part that pisses you off, or the concept of enjoying fighting? Or both? No, it’s the posting it on this subreddit that pisses me off. The lying doesn’t piss me off nearly so much - that …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:41 PM
1

Still not answering the question are you? Why did you think that saying “I like to fucking fight, and I’m done being ashamed about it.” would be in anyway appropriate to establishing legal rights for men? Seriously, why?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:36 PM
1

Well of course I have! I’m reading your bullshit! And answer the question - why have you posted this in Men’s Rights.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:34 PM
1

Seriously now - why have you posted this on here? Give me one reason why you think a site devoted to Men’s Rights is appropriate for your adolescent fantasies about fighting?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:33 PM
-1

It’s not an assumption - I know you’re a lying faggot. edit World of Warcraft doesn’t count - I’m sure you’ve many a blister on your thumbs from overexertion on your console
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:30 PM
1

Like just landing a clean punch exactly how you meant to, and seeing the other guy get damaged and you know you were effective in what you did. Fuck. It's amazing. You’re no Chuck Palahniuk are you really? Frankly I think it betters people, as ugly as it is. You really are grade ‘A’ cunt, aren’t you?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:30 PM
0

Why don’t cunts like you fuck off out of here and go to TRP?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:27 PM
1

Well clearly the danger of suffering irreversible brain damage isn’t going to matter in your case so … why not? Knock yourself out (see what I did there?)
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:27 PM
4

It’s probably a waste of time asking this, but just in case not - what on Earth possessed you to post this on this subreddit? Really, you must have had a reason for thinking "Hmmm, you know I want to lie to the Interwebs about just how much I like fighting - where can I put this where I’ll get an appreciate audience? Bazinga! Men’s Rights on Reddit!" Seriously, what can we expect next? A post entitled "My dick is 10” long and every inch is blue steel?” Or maybe “Why I like to do it with girls”?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:25 PM
1

I did the survey and while it looks like a load of shite it is at least legitimate looking shite.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:41 AM
2

I think you’ll find that’s just the platform on which the survey has been hosted - what you’re saying is little different from saying never do a questionnaire hosted on SurveyMonkey because it’s a private company ...
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:34 AM
1

What are you on about?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:18 AM
1

What are you on about?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:18 AM
2

sorry bout' callin ya an asshole, Don’t worry, I won’t melt : - ))
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:11 AM
1

I enjoyed point 2.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:58 AM
2

i guess we are in agreement that this study is obviously meant to make us look even shittier. Yes … the irony of it given that it’s meant to be about research into trolls ...
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:43 AM
1

There is an End study now button meaning you can quit at any time.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:21 AM
3

If you answered YES to these questions, help the cause and please participate in on our study of social attitudes and online behaviours. I’m going to do it, but surely the purpose of research is to try and prove/disprove a hypothesis and not “help a cause”? edit1 I feel like it would have been better to say this: Purpose of Research Project: To gather information that will help us understand how social attitudes and preferences for different activities are related to online behaviors such as deb…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:43 AM
7

My emphasis: … SFC Martland, a Green Beret Bronze Star recipient, faces expulsion from the Army because he intervened to protect a child from an Afghan child-rapist – an Afghan commander allied with U.S. forces. ... The child-predator admitted the crime then laughed. “It’s just a boy,” he mocked. Deciding to send the man – and others – a message, the soldiers forcibly removed the predator from the base. ... the military took action against the protector, not the predator. Now, SFC Martland await…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 08:11 AM
1

UK men die, on average, 4 years before women. Slackers! What is it with men and only ever doing half a job? s.m.h / s
/r/MensRights04/03/16 12:30 AM
3

To be honest, I think that experience is a lot more common than it’s given credit for - the ideologues in this world rarely have a direct hand in the things that they wish to take control over and transform.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 08:12 PM
1

No problem. However, you’ve explained that repeatedly and I have understood what you are saying - but this link is not going to make me change my mind any more than you asserting that it is simply about "raising awareness in general”. You are obviously entitled to your point of view, but if you are trying to engage me you need to say (at the very least): a) Why you think it is not easy to tell the difference between this and a parody of the same (please see the moment where three women in black …
/r/MensRights03/03/16 07:46 PM
1

The point of that is what? edit By which I mean, the point of you sending that link to me is what (not what is the point of the link’s content - which is clear)
/r/MensRights03/03/16 07:22 PM
1

I honestly think you're reading too much into the video. Have you even watched it through? At what point in anything I have said has too much been read into it? You’re welcome to dispute the conclusions I’ve drawn and my opinion of the video but you cannot actually claim that I am reading anything into that video that has not been put their by the people who produced and participated in it. It is not simply "raising awareness in general” to choose that particular song from that particular docume…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 04:05 PM
1

its a real thing Yes, it is however, saying that the gap is irrefutable evidence that we live in a patriarchal sexist society is fucking bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 09:16 AM
4

The persistent gender pay gap is a combination of economic, political and social issues that are generally associated with a worker's family circumstances and their labour market histories. The insistence that the 'gender pay gap’ is irrefutable evidence that we live in a patriarchal sexist society just will not go away and die, will it? Surprisingly, managerial gender pay gaps were found to be more of an issue in female-dominated industries than male-dominated industries. It’s not surprising at…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 08:08 AM
1

A little background on this … Now that I know that it is not a parody it does nothing to dispel the idea that "the people who have produced this” didn’t really think the whole think through very well. So keen are they to demonstrate the seriousness of the issue that the video spills over into an ersatz emotional pitch that trivialises sexual assault. This is their cover of Lady Gaga's song about her experiences … According to Wikipedia at least, it’s "A universal song about any kind of loss in l…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 07:51 AM
10

Christ all mighty
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:55 AM
0

The video is unavailable in my region
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:50 AM
3

Yeah, I don't see u.s. celebrities telling British citizens who to vote for. Please accept my apologies - we’re not all quite so arrogant as this (even our dentistry is improving as well). (Personally, I find Trump a bit contemptible but that’s just my opinion and have no intention of ever trying to persuade someone how they should vote in their own election).
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:56 AM
2

Poe's Law states: “Without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism.” While the use of the label “extremism” is possibly debatable, the idea that this is indistinguishable from parody is not. edit I really have no idea whether or not this is a parody. If it is not a parody, then the people who have produced this should probably do some soul-searching and consider whether an…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:52 AM
1

The video is unavailable in my region, but regardless: 1 John Oliver is an Englishman trying to persuade US citizens how they should vote on a particular issue. In case nobody else noticed this, having an Englishman try to tell an American what he/she can do with the liberty the latter won from the former in 1776 is about as successful as … as successful as … well, Piers Morgan on gun control and Ian Katz, editor of The Guardian at the time of the Bush-Gore election who hit upon the genius idea …
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:37 AM
2

Well, I know what you mean although without any information about how he came to be in the residence in the first place it’s hard to speculate (we just don’t know why he was there at all).
/r/MensRights24/02/16 09:15 PM
3

This is kind of [a] double-edged sword. The article links to findings from this 2003 research paper to support the claim that: One in six boys is sexually abused before his 18th birthday Many readers, including myself, have been skeptical of the '1 in 5’ claim for college campus sexual assaults, how that result was obtained but more importantly how that research has been grossly simplified in order to use as an instrument for a particularly ferocious kind of partisan politics. If readers here do…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 03:56 PM
2

Oh, I see, thanks. That makes more sense than talking about being called “closeted gays” in the MSM and being “anti-American” which just don’t.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 03:37 PM
4

You’re right to be cautious with so few details but, yes, like you this sounds a lot like the reality might turn out to be quite different from the charge as it is now.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:08 PM
3

How is this important for Men’s Rights?
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:07 PM
6

I think you meant to post this is in /r/Politics.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:46 PM
78

Yes, I think you’re right - I think it should be remembered that a 15 year-old is perfectly capable of overpowering and sexually assaulting someone. However, in this case, The Star Tribune reports that: “Coercion was used” by the boy on his victim from September until January … the woman had no mental or physical challenges that would have made her vulnerable to the assaults … All of the assaults occurred in the residence It’s not really possible to speculate on so little information, but even s…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:04 PM
2

Suit yourself.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:50 AM
-4

Oh, for fuck’s sake! This is so fucking retarded even trolls with throwaway accounts would have abandoned this as bait for being literally too fucking unbelievable.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:17 PM
0

Yes - I think I said as much too.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:59 PM
3

On Tuesday, a former star quarterback from the University of Montana received a $US245,000 ($345,000) settlement from the university … According to Inside Higher Ed, a news site dedicated to stories about universities, as of November 2015 there were more than 50 pending lawsuits filed by men who say they were unfairly kicked off campus after being accused of sexual assault. Money isn’t everything, but that doesn’t mean it’s nothing - far from it. Having universities shell out North of $10,000,00…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 04:26 PM
2

What u/azazelcrowley said. Also, some other points: The campaign to legalize all abortion in the UK … What I am concerned about is the current campaign to have it legalised Putting aside your personal stance on this for one moment, you’ve missed the boat quite frankly on this. As Marie Stopes UK explains: Abortion is legal in the UK up to 24 weeks under the Abortion Act 1967. However, if there is a substantial risk to the woman's life or foetal abnormalities, there is no time limit. There is als…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 04:05 PM
0

the most likely victim of an adult sexual abuser is a boy and the most likely perpetrator is a female teacher It’s undeniably true that boys are a target of abuse from both adults (male and female) as well as their peers, but I don’t know that it’s true to say that it’s “most likely”. Girls absolutely do experience sexual exploitation and abuse in and around schools by teachers, peers and other adults - no one is or should be denying that. But to try and simplify the problem by pinning everythin…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:16 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:10 PM
2

Not very nice, no … but I don’t know about you, but I’m a lot less worried about extremely badly drawn angst from a highly-strung Tumblerette than "A comedy channel for women, by women” directed by a professional (Sarah Rotella) with professional actors and I suspect - this is my guess only and could be completely wrong - gets at least part of its funding support from something like The Canada Council for the Arts.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:33 AM
3

Anything [in religious extremism] that infringes upon gender rights That still leaves with you the issue of who gets to define what a gender right is and how to achieve it - for instance, I am for formal and legal gender equality but against the imposition of gender quotas and see the insistence of anything less than 50-50 parity as a woeful misunderstanding of how demography, probability and statistics meet up. One of the concerns Men's Rights groups have is that men make up the majority of hom…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:44 AM
2

Why is 1 for girls only? What makes you think only women suffer the effects of religious extremism in 2? And what of the many women who embrace those forms of religious extremism and even claim that they feel liberated by it? This one is also fraught with cultural and political issues which I hope should be obvious … 3 is fine except for the same religious problems raised in 2, especially where boys are concerned. It’s not the poverty and homelessness aren’t important, but 4 is way out of the sc…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 10:23 PM
1

Where sex education is taught parents have to be informed and some refuse to let their children participate, something which can be a particular issue in faith schools. There’s the elephant in the fucking room.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 08:27 PM
10

From the report (my emphasis): In a poll, 22 per cent reported having some experience of sexual touching, groping, flashing, sexual assault or rape while they were “in or around” school, the children’s charity Plan UK said. Plan UK has just launched a new campaign called “Because I am a girl” which includes the hashtag #LearnWithoutFear and which comes with a series of videos that I swear to God have to be seen to be believed. In this one, all boys and men are revealed to murderous, impulse-driv…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 08:09 PM
2

And then some.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:22 PM
2

Well, the statistic isn’t made up, but it’s more how it was arrived at. Although perhaps the point they are trying to make is that a person who accepts the man/woman, white/latina woman different as being true, must also of necessity accept that lesbian women earn a premium.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:17 PM
8

If you think that’s bad … there’s this.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:59 PM
5

I’m very surprised to see this in the Economist of all places: LABOUR markets are hotbeds of inequality. For every dollar a white American man in full-time work earns, the average white woman earns 78 cents and the average Latina only 56 cents. Might as well give up trying to point out the problems with wage gap statistics now if even they’re touting that as fact without qualifying how that figure is calculated.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:56 PM
1

Because no one's ever been killed by someone they know, right? What are you talking about now you fucking idiot? Are you actually suggesting that husbands and date partners would be more likely to murder women they’ve had sex with on the off-chance that they might later be accused of raping them without consent? The rest of your remarks are no more valid than mine. You fucking wish you imbecile.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:50 PM
13

I know. Feminists activists and their supporters are often criticised for being white and middle class - while intersectionality’s an attempt to address the former charge, they still haven’t got very far with the latter. They simply do not understand what kind of dismally educated, semi-literate, emotionally retarded and above all bored women-children there are out there as mothers. Yes, I know that sounds harsh, but I’m really not making it up. There is a definite and growing underclass of wome…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:45 PM
1

But my point is you are conflating what I consider to be two very different categories of rape - the violent stranger-rape attack and the category of rape loosely called ‘date rape’ but in any case where the alleged rapist is already known to the complainant. You seem to be taking the line that ‘maniac’ rapists are rational - they are not. If we get rid of due process as those in the article are suggesting, it won’t make one iota of difference as to whether the stranger/home invader rapist then …
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:22 AM
3

I'm referring to people who actually have committed the crime. Then, with respect, you’ve missed the point of the article. Stranger-rapes - the ‘maniacs’ - are generally successfully tracked and caught by the police and and then convicted by the courts. The serial rapist who attacked the 'Jane Doe’ mentioned in the article was eventually caught and is now serving 20 years. In other words, what you are saying would be true is already the case now - and tragically, there are already rapists, almos…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:57 AM
7

"If 19 out of 20 [victims of sexual assault] don't even come forward, we are debating a tiny sliver of the problem,” [Blackhouse] said. That’s a very big “If”. If Feminist scholarship supplies the “expertise” to argue a twenty-fold increase in the number of charges brought through a set of special courts. If - as they do now with domestic violence - they can offer “education” classes in lieu of a lengthy, expensive and uncertain trial process for the accused on condition that he admit to a rape …
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:43 AM
17

All this will do is increase the number of rape-murders, since rapists will choose to kill their victims to ensure they don't go to rape court. What the hell are you talking about? Isn’t the point here that Gomeshi was not a rapist, that the acts were entirely consensual, and that this was proved in a court of law in a really quite dramatic way through the reading aloud of his accusers own emails saying things like “you’ve got nice hands” and sending photos of themselves simulating fellatio on b…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:35 AM
17

That’s only one of his two reasons - this one is the other: "That's coupled with the fact that many men are scared of, or worried about being accused of impropriety with young children or false accusations that could end their career.” They’re not wrong either. 'Vast majority' of allegations against teachers are false
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:49 AM
1

If you agree with something someone says, don't lead your response by indicting [sic] you disagree … But I do disagree because the analogy doesn’t work. Either you really actually cannot read, or else, which I think is more likely, you are sticking to your original - incorrect point - regardless without going back to re-read the original comment you think you are commenting on.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:23 AM
6

Have no idea as to the X-post question, but this was really nice to see and hear about.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:07 PM
1

That’s actually a very good idea, but - with respect - I can see a couple of flaws: First, it assumes that some feminists don’t already subscribe, read and drop by here - there’s some that almost certainly do Second, it assumes they would approach the challenge with an eye to being objective - whereas instead they would be more likely to focus on every post with the Feminism, Anti-MRM and False accusations flairs and ignore all the others - you know the ones that aren’t flash points for them. Th…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:03 PM
7

This person gets paid to teach. Quite apart from the more obviously egregious comments, when he says that, like, half the words in English come from French it should be obvious to anyone that he meant ‘half' in the sense of 'a bunch of / a loads of’, but she picks up on this and uses it as a point to demean him by saying actually ‘young man’ it’s 29%. It’s a figure that sounds clever, but it’s basically ignorant bullshit which she would know if she knew the difference between this and this, whic…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 09:35 AM
1

Well someone has to uphold the long-standing tradition of the Yellow Press.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:35 AM
4

She'll be eaten by rabid feminists soon enough. It’s already happened at least once - she wrote an article called Why patriarchy fears the scissors - for women, short hair is a political statement after which she got an absolute shoeing from the sisters who hated her for it: But poor Penny really got it in the neck from the sisters of social media. In sticking up for short hair, she had alienated and offended the longer-haired sorority, as well as black women, somehow. ‘Long hair with ragged end…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:33 AM
1

Well, I’m sure that is possible but the point, surely, is to avoid such superciliousness and cheap emotional blackmailing altogether - for me at least, it’s not just what she was trying to say but how she was saying it that rankled.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:15 AM
1

Yes, it’s a pretty good video that.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:26 PM
3

I have nothing against attention-seeking sluts. In fact, I wish some would seek attention from me. More ammunition for the haters.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:25 PM
1

Sighs Yes, it is. You just can’t read.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 10:57 PM
1

The borders are porous though, if you know what I mean. Some MGTOW get involved in MRM discussions and debates as do TERPers and they do it here as well as in their own forums.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 10:35 PM
1

That's not what he's asking. I know exactly what he’s asking and if you read everything I wrote you would know that.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 10:33 PM
5

From the article (my emphases): After a storm of media coverage about the possibility of a so-called revenge porn ring targeting women students at University College Dublin, it is now all but certain the group never existed at all. […] The report, however, did not draw from a single confirmed witness to such behaviour. Instead, as revealed by an investigation into the allegations by the university, it based its explosive claim on an unidentified student, “Sarah”, who had heard about, but not see…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 10:32 PM
3

For those short on time or simply lacking the stomach to wade through her bullshit, the offending line is in bold below: You are free to reject feminism. You are free to do so without understanding anything about what that word actually means, because somebody told you that feminists were all attention-seeking sluts who wanted special treatment and hated men. I don't know who that somebody was, and it would be too easy just to point out how you seem to be parroting the language of so-called 'men…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 10:02 PM
1

Because using your analogy I could have some drinks at the bar before getting into my car and then get hit by a reckless driver shooting a red light who totals my car - my driving under the influence was illegal, but it would have had nothing to do with the other guy’s bad driving. A rapist is still a rapist if he rapes a woman while she’s drunk. However … there is a real problem here, but it’s not about responsibility but about perception. Some women believe they are the victim of a rape becaus…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 08:56 PM
3

Why thank you kindly - if only I could have put it as succinctly as you did I’d be golden ; - ) Of course, who would respect the authority of a person who asserts their authority on the assumption that you don't respect their authority? I see this a lot because I work in a field where women outnumber men by quite a significant margin - it’s not unusual to find myself to be one of only a handful of guys or even on some rarer occasions literally the only man in the team. I still haven’t worked out…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 04:38 PM
1

Robin Dunbar is a very prestigious evolutionary psychologist who has written, amongst other things, Human Evolution and Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language - he’s done a lot of work that shows how brain power relates to the sociality of species so as this is all about social interaction, the conclusions are likely very reliable.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:31 PM
7

Well, obviously there’s only one thing for it - you’ll have to pressure you’re government into enforcing a law that says all kindy councils be made of 50-50 women and men or be fined $1,000 for having unequal representation of one gender or the other. Only kidding - I’m not a Feminist, ; - ) Speaking of Feminists though, they would love your anecdote about your kindy experience. You’ve described the unequal gender make-up of the council; the fact that the only other person of your gender is of t…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:15 PM
1

My apologies if I've given the impression I am trolling. It was simply because I’m always a bit wary whenever someone uses the 'No true Scotsman’ line as you did previously when you said: But these are specific groups with specific feelings within feminism. There are Black supremacy groups and Black right activists. If we’d been talking about someone with a blog or a YoutTube channel with a tiny number of subscribers, then I think it’s fair to say that person’s views aren’t representative of mai…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 01:41 PM
2

it's a problem It’s one that seems intractable, too. It’s very frustrating.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 08:14 PM
1

That’s an old one and it’s just some anonymous blogger - I think you should actually check out who her antecedents are such as Catharine MacKinnon who, to be fair, even some other leading Feminists think are bat-shit crazy.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 10:20 AM
1

The thing it is true, and presumably you must have noticed this too, that a lot of posters on this subreddit are (or should be) pretty much TRP-ers. They comment here a lot and it is always those comments that are singed out for being examples of “rape apology” and so on and so on even when they aren’t. For instance, that user that OP here had the exchange with makes a link to this comment that appeared on this subreddit a while back: Just look at the difference in dress. Girls wearing basically…
/r/MensRights19/02/16 09:33 AM
1

I'm used to people criticizing the MRM but I've never seen someone say something this outlandish … I’m still unclear as to whether they are trolls or not, but there are some literally incredible comments all across reddit e.g. I think the MRA is a terrorist organisation. I can’t provide the link to that one as it was an r/againstmensrights and the mods would therefore delete this post for linking to that subreddit. Of course, the clue is in the name that they would be hostile in that case and th…
/r/MensRights19/02/16 09:24 AM
1

What does that even mean?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 08:25 AM
8

True. Some time they fondly spent with their new overlords, probably one-on-one. Touche - "Allied Deserters in league with the Paris underworld brought an unprecedented crime-wave to post liberation Paris" Do the men in that story in any represent the majority of soldiers in the same way those women in your link were even remotely representative of French women under German occupation let alone the thousands of British, Canadian, South African and ANZAC women who signed up and served in their co…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 05:50 AM
3

they weren't drafted to die either That is true. Unfortunately, it’s not the caption on the photo or the thread title.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 05:42 AM
10

This is bullshit. There might have been dozens of men for every Violette Szabo, but women still got involved in support roles for front line troops like the ATS. They didn’t spend the entire time partying either.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 05:19 AM
2

But these are specific groups with specific feelings within feminism. The only way in which what you are saying here could be true is if Anita Sarkeesian, Clementine Ford and Germaine Greer were fringe figures - “Black supremacy groups” - who did not represent the majority of “good” Feminists - “Black right[s] activists”. Germaine Greer’s The Female Eunuch was and still is a key Feminist text; Anita Sarkeesian has spoken as a Feminist in the United Nations and and her Feminist Frequency organisa…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:59 AM
6

Feminism has fought no wars. Well, no … of course it fucking hasn’t - neither has the BBC, the MRM, the Women’s Institute, or the The Royal Philatelic Society, London. It has killed no opponents. Yet. It has set up no concentration camps ... Give it time. … starved no enemies What the fuck is this? A wish list? … practiced no cruelties. That’s a matter of opinion, quite frankly. It’s battles have been for education, for the vote, for better working conditions … for safety on the streets … for ch…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:23 PM
2

I have an odd fear of divide and conquer Then you ought to be downright terrified of Feminism if that’s the case. This Feminist panel discussion’s become famous for Anita Sarkeesian saying “Everything is sexist, everything is racist, everything is homophobic and you have to point it all out”, but to me what’s more interesting is what she says immediately after that line from about 33’10” through to about 35’04”. This is where Sarkeesian and Australians Clementine Ford and Germaine Greer all make…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:25 PM
2

… would that be worthwhile? That very much depends on what you think the purpose is, what you are hoping to achieve as well as what age group this is aimed at, now that we’ve moved away from men and boys to just boys. You have also shifted the ground on which you began - originally, you stated that the ‘issue’ was that "men and boys ... have difficulty interacting with women on a basic level” (in your experience) whereas now this has become "questions about girls or women” which seems to be a qu…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 03:41 PM
3

Why is /r/fatepeoplehate banned but /r/justneckbeardthings isn't? Because Social Justice activism and activists essentially have absolutely no issue with the concepts of racism and other forms of prejudice, only at whom that racism and prejudice is being directed. White, cis-heterosexual men in the developed world are considered to be at the ‘centre’ of history and everyone else - to varying degrees - on the margin. They want to de-centre the core of Western civilisation by de-centring it - one …
/r/MensRights17/02/16 02:33 PM
8

I think it would be useful just for groups of boys together, to talk through their thoughts about girls and women. I don’t mean to be rude, but this is literally the worst idea you could possibly have come up with: Firstly, boys are not girls - therefore they don’t behave like girls and expecting them to do so is ridiculous Secondly, having them sit in a groups - presumably in a circle or horseshoe - has got to be the almost polar opposite of “a supportive environment” Thirdly, while individuals…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 02:18 PM
3

I've had experience with men and boys, that have difficulty interacting with women on a basic level. The question is unanswerable in any meaningful way if you don’t explain what you mean by interaction (when? where? with whom? in what contexts?), what you consider a basic level to be. Quite apart from those points, with this being in reference to your own personal experience, why do you presume that it is their interaction that is inappropriate rather than your own? Working class men in the UK v…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 02:03 PM
0

They have a right to protest … it’s how they protest that is at issue and whether the action they take counts as protest at all.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 01:37 PM
3

Not try to involve Feminism. They’re not interested so that’s not the way. Pretty much keep doing what’s happening now. If you think things aren’t changing I think you need to see how much things have changed - however slowly - over the last 2, 5, 10, 20 years. Two years ago, I’d never even heard of MRAs let alone had visited this subreddit - and I know I’m not alone in that.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 01:17 PM
1

It may not be immediately obvious as to why as it isn’t on the theme of gender, but I absolutely urger anyone and everyone to read Karl Popper’s The Open Society and its Enemies.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:58 PM
2

I am just looking for ways to push men's issues forward. They have found some amazing ways to push their agendas (no matter how crazy) Yes, it’s called institutional and government funding. They have enormous financial support - not only from government, but a huge wedge of it comes from there - and significant moral support from the Media. Also, what makes you think the average Feminist is looking for a conciliation? Because I can assure you they are not. Evidence can be supplied on request.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:56 PM
1

Ah, humour? Don’t give up the day job. Really.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:50 PM
2

I’d be careful about what you’re saying because someone else - let’s say, oh I don’t know, an eccentric American billionaire with political ambition sporting a distinctive bouffant - were to publicly announce something like: "I think the most dangerous offenders just happen to be black men. Of course white, Latino and Asian men offend too but perhaps they're not the most dangerous?“ How would you feel about such a comment? However, I sort of take your point - men overall are on average taller, s…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:47 PM
5

I think the problem is more this: Unlike most existing schemes, which involve group work or family therapy, offenders on the Drive programme will be given bespoke one-to-one sessions. In striving to remove any suggestion of blame from women who are victims of IPV, it does nothing to resolve ways in which the dynamic in their relationship might encourage and/or provoke any violence from such men. The example they give in that story says this: In 2011, after Ms Williams filed for divorce, her husb…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:32 AM
3

I thought this subreddit didn’t go in for banning? (Apart from obvious exceptions like spamming etc.) Has that changed or has it always been that way?
/r/MensRights16/02/16 08:31 AM
1

Well it can hardly be denied that he’s left off over-egging the pudding by more than just a soupçon back there, especially with his comments on abortion and having more than one sexual partner, but … … while he is a Christian Republican firebrand if you can wade through the barrage of hyperbole the core points he makes are pretty much on the button as regards Feminism. Yes of course, there are plenty of Feminist women who are married and who have children as well, but it’s those very same women …
/r/MensRights16/02/16 08:22 AM
-5

Yes, it’s a shame I’m so inarticulate and lacking in higher education.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:07 PM
-2

Well, you’re clearly beyond help so let’s just draw a line under this one, eh?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:01 PM
-6

Fallacy Puh ha ha ha ha ha fuck off you imbecile.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:00 PM
-2

… do americans think once you're 18 you're magically all-knowing and wise? I have no fucking clue, but what does happen at 18 - or at least 16 as it is here in the UK - is that it becomes legal and you are considered a consenting adult. I mean what you are actually saying here? That if you had a 12 year-old girl you would think “Ah, they grow up so fast these days, don’t they?” SHE WAS 12 YEARS OLD YOU FUCKING RETARD. What kind of ass-backwards irresponsible fee love hippy bullshit fucking paren…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 12:44 PM
-3

Alright Jed Clampett, calm down for a minute and think about what you’re actually saying here: Because you had sex when you were a 12 year-old with a 13 year-old girl - I assume without getting her knocked up - it’s somehow completely OK for other 12 year-old girl’s to be caught up with 14 year-old boys? And what’s more, show me the paragraph or sentence in that report that says it was consensual at all? All it actually says is that he "believed had a sexual encounter” so we don’t know if it’s t…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 12:38 PM
4

And the granddaughter was twelve
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:51 AM
0

… thought he was entitled to take a child's life for having consensual sex with his granddaughter. Shooting the boy was wrong and I’m not defending him … but the boy didn’t die, thankfully, and … a 14-year-old boy who the man believed had a sexual encounter with his 12-year-old relative. She was 12 - what kind of consensual sex do you think this was?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:51 AM
14

getting this worked up about it You have a strange idea of what getting worked up about something looks like … either that or you haven’t read the comments ITT.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 08:11 PM
10

Have a look here. Edit Added: Also this video.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 07:27 PM
1

Roseanne the TV show is still funny, even now.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 05:39 PM
226

Because of course, being the daughter of a well-known BBC producer and a famous actress of stage and screen and having been educated at the University of Cambridge Emma has absolutely no idea what it’s like to be part of a privileged elite ...
/r/MensRights14/02/16 05:38 PM
-1

What’s this fucking numpty on about?
/r/MensRights14/02/16 04:13 PM
1

Heh ; - ) Yes, OK I’m not a fan of Diane Abbott’s either as I think she’s a bit of a charlatan, but I hardly think a woman with barely five years experience of politics should be throwing her weight about like she’s the new hot stuff on the block to people in the shadow cabinet who’ve been in parliament for over three decades - that’s a sign of extreme and unwarranted arrogance, intense stupidity or, more likely, both. She's not wrong … Well, I don’t know - a lot of politicians are schmucks its’…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 03:09 PM
4

Why do you feel so threatened by feminism? Not for any of the reasons that a number of self-identfiying Feminists frequently flatter themselves with e.g. being afraid of losing patriarchal power; being intimidated by ‘strong’ women; being an arch-Republican and authoritarian Conservative traditionalist; being a ‘hater' etc. etc. Although I acknowledge that there are a number of different versions and schools of thought within Feminism (e.g. some accept transwomen as women, while others don’t), o…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 03:04 PM
1

I’m not defending her actions - she cheated on him (apparently). But what kind of asshole goes to all that effort - the tie as a blindfold, the sweet tones that he uses to make her think a nice surprise is coming? That makes me think he’s as bad as her and they deserved one another.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 02:40 PM
0

You sound like a right charmer.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:45 PM
1

You'd be surprised. Maybe I would.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:34 PM
1

I don’t think there are many trolls that would have written as much as I have in response to your comments - and if there were any that did do that, I think they would have to go back to troll school as they’d be doing it wrong if they were wasting more of their own time than their targets.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:24 PM
1

What are you stupid? I’ve addressed your points asking questions that show where I think there are weak points in the argument you are presenting it. You have apparently bought into Chomsky’s argument wholesale without critically questioning for yourself just what it is you have decided to buy into. You have no business getting upset with me or anyone else who can see the flaws in those arguments. If your only defence of these ideas is to call me an idiot, then I think that says more about your …
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:19 PM
-1

OK, I confess that I watched most of this video - but that guy’s an asshole.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:03 PM
2

I don't see any contradiction .. And neither, apparently, did you see that I wrote "It doesn't have to be an either/or choice … “. But no matter. … I do see many contradictions in the policies. Specifically between killing people and spreading liberty. Just to be clear, I have at no point defended the action in Vietnam - my only purpose in raising it at all was to give an example of where the Far Left believe they achieved a change in government policy - i.e. an end to hostilities and the withdr…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 12:59 PM
2

... claiming that the anti-war movement was a joke and that policy planners paid little attention to them. This is false. This is no doubt my own fault for flippantly describing the protesters as "a horde of sandal-wearing hippy students with their Mao's little red book", but that shouldn't blind to the fact that the point you make with the citation from Chomsky - more on him in a minute - does nothing to address the main point of which that was but one example: my main point was that: Feminists…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 11:08 AM
10

As long as the State has to prove you are guilty before throwing you into prison, you are safe. As soon as you have to prove you are innocent, a nasty government or a raging mob can have you locked away for years and you can do nothing about it. One of the most disturbing aspects of the more robust kinds of activism in the name of Feminism and/or Social Justice is that they are an overt attempt to subvert the actual State and substitute it with their own, quasi-State complete with courts, judges…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:47 AM
4

If you're serious about developing your thesis more fully for whatever reason (a college or blog/vlog essay) then I think the first thing you need to do is explain why similar patterns exist in other countries in which the influence of Feminism and the Far Left (i.e. social justice advocates) is either not as evident to the same degree as it is in the Anglosphere, such as Japan, or whose influence is arguably unrelated to the decline in births such as Italy. I think it would be worth your while …
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:10 AM
15

Historically, particularly in the West, have females gotten the rotten deal? Well they’ve had a "rotten deal", but whether or not they got the (only) “rotten" deal is highly debatable. But it all depends on what you’re willing to consider oppression to mean, and how willing you are to be blind to certain inconvenient facts of history, how people really behaved and how that behaviour denies the narrative you’re describing. Like I’m just reading a book about the English Civil War at the moment, an…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 09:26 AM
7

The driver of the other vehicle, Albert Noel Burns, 47, also died on the scene. Wow … 15 words out of about 320 in the whole article. Also, I noticed this: Shocked friends and family are paying tribute to a young pregnant mum who lost her life in an early morning crash. So Mr Noel Burns had no friends or family or what?
/r/MensRights13/02/16 08:43 AM
6

The report in the Independent makes the following claim (my emphasis): When a 19-year-old student went to the police in 2007 saying she had been drugged and raped by her taxi driver, the police laughed at her and told her that she must have been drunk and fallen over […] It was this case, among others, that led the Met to adopt the stance that rape victims should always be believed in the first instance. Here, on the other hand, is the 2010 report of the investigation by Deborah Glass from the I…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 08:26 AM
1

You are junior in high school, how about … etc. Actually, I think you’ll find that this is bait.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 07:41 AM
3

The villain looks like a cross between a hipster and Michael Palin
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:51 PM
2

Yawn She’s so fucking tedious I really start to wonder whether its people like us who are the only people who read the radgey cunt.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:47 PM
3

Sick fuck.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:39 PM
-2

I think you’re just saying what I said, but fine if you makes you happy.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:16 PM
18

It’s a classic SJW trope. It’s saying that unless you are actively preventing rape you are supporting rape culture. So it may or may not be sexist, but it is fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:50 PM
4

I know. And that in absolutely no way changes the point of my question "why would anyone want to emulate [a bunch of assholes]?” I’m disgusted by the hypocrisy of things like hashtag KillAllMen - I’m hardly going to change my mind over the suicide of a young woman, however narcissistic and conniving she might have been when alive. Only if she had been an actual murderer or something of that sort would I be likely not to give a shit about someone saying “No loss”.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:46 PM
0

You're equating the reaction with gender, No, I’m not. if it was a man behaving this way, I'd feel exactly the same. And I would respond exactly the same.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:18 PM
5

if you look at "against men's rights" on reditt it is the sort of thing they write every day They’re a bunch of assholes - why would anyone want to emulate them?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:16 PM
1

It was also 2002 - I believe things have changed quite a bit in the last decade.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:16 PM
1

the guy could have hanged himself He could have, but he didn’t. She on the other hand actually did commit suicide. Suicide is a serious men’s issue considering the rate at which they are killing themselves - I would be utterly disgusted if I read somewhere about the suicide of a Men’s Rights Activist under which could be found a comment saying “No loss”.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:06 PM
1

She was spoiled and also manipulative, yes, but she also killed herself. When male rates of suicide are at least three times higher than those of women, are we now in the business of deciding which suicides are worthy of sympathy and which are not?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:04 PM
1

I think there’s probably some truth in that - they do after all have to establish the truth - but from what little documentary evidence I’ve seen on TV at least, they do seem to take remarkable care not to come across as insensitive. The courts of course are another matter - the most famous case being that of Lindsay Armstrong whose court case is widely believed to have driven her to suicide as it included her being asked by the defence counsel to hold up the underwear she was wearing on the day…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:03 PM
2

Fucking hell, man! A young girl kills herself and the parents are devastated and all you can say is “No loss”? Fuck you, man.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 12:10 PM
2

The only people who are making the claim that "nobody will believe you" are feminists. Yes. Bizarrely, too, as they of all people should be aware of the help that is available out there such as this, and this, and this. In fact, for Philips and others to argue that "nobody will believe you” looks even more ridiculous in the face of the wide range of government sponsored organisations and other NGOs that are there precisely to investigate claims with great sensitivity and thoroughness.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 11:57 AM
7

Jesus is that real?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 10:48 AM
7

When she first came into the media spotlight with her flippant comments about International Men’s Day I just thought she was a run-of-the-mill rent-a-gobshite politician … but the more often she's appeared in the media the more I’ve come to realise that she’s an utterly hopeless amateur who’s completely out of her depth and who should never have been selected for MP in the first place. She’d barely been a part-time city councillor for three years before she became an MP - that’s a fraction of th…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:51 PM
4

I'm not referring just to this subreddit. Then the salient point remains the same. I have no where in the message above denied that there are not criticisms of Feminism ("That said, there are absolutely ‘flash points’ if you like between Feminism and the MRM and so those members who are more committed do absolutely make frequent and cogently argued points against it”). … on Tumblr, on Twitter, on Youtube, in articles, on blogs. I am now even more wary of your claim that this is about "the majori…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:35 PM
7

Why do the majority of MRA/MRM posts on male issues focus so much on feminism instead of the issues that need to be solved? You seem confident that the majority of posts on this subreddit are in fact about Feminism - certainly, many of them are as it is a relevant issue, but the majority? How have you decided that it’s the majority? Have you been counting? Over what time period? What criteria are you using to decide whether or not such-and-such a post does or does not involve a criticism of Femi…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 09:34 PM
32

Just listening to this on the radio now - don’t think it should be underestimated quite how revolutionary a statement this is or how far Hogan-Howe is stretching his neck over the line in saying this (which in itself might be indicative of something). I hope he has a sturdy umbrella as the usual suspects are about to deluge him in shit any time about now ...
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:05 AM
2

Or it could shrink it further, which would not … sorry, seem to be terribly pessimistic at the moment.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 06:43 PM
6

Pour example “Freedom of speech is a responsibility,” Waggeh said. “You should use your privilege to be responsible for one another. Be conscious of what you speak, because a lot of people could take your message wrong.” Yiannopoulos's offensive rhetoric can be found across his Twitter, which was recently unverified for seemingly political reasons. Just one example of his many controversial tweets includes, "Feminists want to do away with gender pronouns in that they’re all so disgustingly fat n…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:53 PM
1

[At] the rooftop bar of the St. Louis Hilton … many were riveted by an animated discussion at one table. Loudly, and apparently without caring who heard her, a research assistant … charged that her boss … had “sexually assaulted” her in his hotel room after a meeting the previous September in Florence, Italy. (She requested that her name not appear in this story to protect her privacy.) So: a conference, a bar, copious amounts of alcohol - we can only assume - and a woman shouts for all the conf…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 02:13 PM
1

She's referring to a broader group of sexual participants. Well, no not really - I know what you’re trying to get at but she’s really talking about just two roles - victim and rapist partner. Her entire article is based around the questions "What if he doesn't know what he's done? Is it possible that my rapist doesn't know he's a rapist?”, but the point, surely, is that these questions are reversible and we can just as easily ask of her What if she thinks happened didn’t happen? Is it possible t…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 01:55 PM
3

So there is a set way a victim should act after their rape? … "Well no. . . fuck it, he's a guy. Guys always consent." I wonder if the following word I’ve highlighted in the paragraph below constitutes a Freudian slip on the author’s part? That interpretation is unacceptable. If we rely on a resounding "no" to determine something is unwanted rather than a resounding "yes" to determine that something is wanted, we make it the job of the victim to prevent themselves from being raped, rather than t…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 10:18 AM
4

On almost every point
/r/MensRights10/02/16 09:31 AM
4

Wow, what an asshole. Still, will it really make any material difference to the impenetrable ignorance of those who’ve maintained that to the be case all along?
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:39 AM
3

Jesus Christ it’s the 1930s.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:37 AM
7

Quite a few years ago now, I went to see British MP and serial controversialist George Galloway give a lecture. On almost every point that it is possible to have a disagreement, I disagree with Galloway. Not only are his ideas generally repellent and some of his activities questionable but even his person - the outrageous vanity and self-importance of the man - is likely to induce nausea. But I went to that lecture and I listened and I took notes and then I left because I understand completely t…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:32 AM
4

The writing in that article makes me despair almost as much as the event it’s reporting on.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:11 AM
-2

That was my first thought!
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:09 AM
2

Presenter: The CPS1 have said there was sufficient evidence for this case to proceed to court … If the bar is so low, then we’re all fucked. It makes an absolute mockery of the legal system. 1 The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) is the principal public prosecuting agency for conducting criminal prosecutions in England and Wales. It is headed by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).
/r/MensRights09/02/16 07:57 PM
1

Jesus it was just a cheap excuse to tell that joke ...
/r/MensRights09/02/16 06:21 AM
2

I got no advice/support here. This is the first comment that came out on the top of your original thread - that poster included the links, which I haven’t here. This sounds like a horrible situation for you. Do your daughter and sister support you? Friends? Having some people close to you to rely on for support is always good. I'm not a counsellor or anything just an someone who wants to help in a small way. Here is a search link to legal aid in the Ottawa area. The Canadian Centre for Men and F…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:45 PM
31

Q What have Budweiser and having sex in a canoe got in common? A They’re both fucking close to water. I wouldn’t drink that fucking piss anyway, so no problem.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:38 PM
5

Having just seen Paul Elam’s video in which he reveals the identity of the actress who made the accusation, there is another dimension to this that I think offers a plausible explanation for why this case went so far. Look at the photos of Pearson - a tall white, middle-aged man in dark casual clothing with completely shaved head. Now in other countries that perhaps doesn’t have any especially sinister connotations - many men of that age who are balding prefer to shave their heads. Samuel L Jack…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:59 AM
3

Street harassment hysteria is a red herring to abridge free speech in public spaces and give government more power; I don’t necessarily disagree with you but do you have actual evidence for this or is this just your hypothesis? There is no epidemic of street harassment, and feminists construe all sorts of innocuous things men say to women as harassment including "hello beautiful.” The ’10-hours of walking in NYC’ video was utterly ridiculous and the claim that there may be an epidemic is almost …
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:40 AM
2

Not remotely surprised, though I swear I just took their logic (so-called) and saw it through to the next step. Fuck me.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:14 PM
3

Well fuck me for a whip-jacked pole cat. On my honour I had no idea and was just following their logic to what seemed a natural conclusion.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:13 PM
2

You should just be frightened … the predictability is almost neither here nor there.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:12 PM
26

Obviously, with a gap like that it’s going to be hard for a female college graduate to find a male college graduate for a mate. This is not going to be the only problem or even the most significant. It doesn’t take a genius to realise how Feminism will transform this into a new form of victimhood which primarily exploits and oppresses women with headlines such as: Women bear the burden of paying back exorbitant student loans Student loans are a Feminist issue Student fees - the new dowry for the…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:40 AM
5

Yes, I’ve just seen that the thread has expanded massively since last night(!) That paper is rather notorious for it’s terrible research design - I’m not asking you to believe me, but I would ask that you scrutinise that paper in detail, especially regarding the method section and the questionnaire that was used as it has been very thoroughly pulled apart by a lot of people for its not inconsiderable flaws. Thank you again for taking the time to participate and apologies if my language or tone h…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:52 AM
11

Not in the OED it’s not. quota |ˈkwəʊtə| noun a limited or fixed number or amount of people or things, in particular: a fixed share of something that a person or group is entitled to receive or is bound to contribute: they were arrested to help fill the quota of arrests the security police had to make during the crackdown.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:47 AM
9

I never said any quotas needed to be filled? I said that the quotas to get into certain positions should be fitted to forming that group. I’m afraid I really can’t grasp the distinction you are making between creating a quote to get into a certain position and not filling said quota. What is the meaning of a quota if it is not to be met? I think this is ridiculous and maybe had a use a some time when soldiers marched long distances but now that rule is useless. If you’re in Texas you should head…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:38 AM
8

Many men have been charged with rape/sexual assault, even though both were intoxicated but conscious. I do not know of any men who have been convicted of such a crime, could you please provide some sources? I don’t have an example to hand of one who was convicted, but this story is a good example nonetheless.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:34 AM
2

Thanks - to be honest by saying "no significant difference” I was really just trying to find a way around the whole issue of what is intelligence, how fit a test of intelligence is IQ, etc. etc. and just get to the main point which is that in terms of mental capacities - in abilities to solve math problems, compose music, write poetry, create architectural plans, perform complex surgeries etc. etc. - there are no significant differences along sex/gender lines.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:27 AM
8

This is literally rape. If you sleep with someone extremely drunk, that is rape. Yes, it is - and I’m sorry but nowhere will you find in my previous messages a comment to the effect that I do not know that this is rape. However you had earlier suggested that not everyone in the US is aware that this is rape - and that, I’m sorry to say, is absolute nonsense. Every normal adult (i.e. with average education, IQ, without mental health issues etc.) knows this. You can disagree, but you will still be…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:24 AM
11

I’m not so lacking in self-awareness that I don’t recognise "Thanks for participating” as an attempt to draw a line under this exchange and I certainly appreciate the time you’ve taken to read and respond to what was a very long message, however … I’d like to leave a couple of additional notes that might be a takeaway even if you don’t have the time to or just feel like replying: Yes, gender is a social construct, yes men are generally stronger than women While not completely contradictory, ther…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:23 AM
0

Definitely an ego problem here. Problem solved then, eh?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:32 PM
1

Heard it all before and it hasn’t improved any with the latest iteration.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:12 PM
10

1) Well, it does certainly sound like misandry, yes, but you can find the argument at this blog here. Of course we can scoff and say “Oh, well that’s just some nut job on the Internet” but rather alarmingly many of that blogger’s ideas and the one about male genocide in particular are already well-trodden territory by the likes of (the late) Professors Sally Miller Gearhart and Mary Daly. But yes, I think we can both (thankfully!) agree that this one is E 2) "these are two different questions” A…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:44 PM
13

You describe yourself as a "typical feminist" in contradistinction to "the extremists” - something I consider to be quite an important set of questions therefore is which of the following do you consider to be T (typical) or E (extremist) feminist views? (Just to give you a heads up, I am deliberately mixing what I at least consider to be a range of positions. Also note that each example has a real world precedent i.e. they are not paranoid fantasies but real claims made by people who self-ident…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:33 PM
14

but it doesn't matter what label you call yourself. Then why have you introduced yourself as a Feminist?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:08 PM
1

There is no insult there that was worthy of that comment being banned. I, for example, am extremely insulted right now that you have egregiously and patronisingly given a link to the definition of the word insult in the dictionary. I can even argue quite strongly your wilful misinterpretation of the question Where is there even an intention to insult? I would not, however, even if I had been a moderator, used that rule to actually censor that comment. The only person who would have not only done…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:00 PM
1

There is no insult there that was worthy of that comment being banned. I, for example, am extremely insulted right now that you have egregiously and patronisingly given a link to the definition of the word insult in the dictionary. I can even argue quite strongly your wilful misinterpretation of the question Where is there *even** an intention to insult?* I would not, however, even if I had been a moderator, used that rule to actually censor that comment. The only person who would have not only …
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:00 PM
1

The 20% and 25% figures cited are estimates of probability over a 4 year period. They say: The incidence of sexual assault is estimated to be between 20% and 25% over a period of 4 years and to be highest during the first 2 years So when you say this: 1) The study measured incidence of the primary outcome after only 1 year, not 4. Are you saying the design of their research was flawed from the outset? Or are you saying something else? 2) The study measured a specific cohort. Yes, indeed and they…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:14 AM
1

The overall numbers from the paper are a bit high, but this could include very marginal cases - "had sex and didn't really want to" type scenarios. You’re not kidding - even in the resistance group, they’re reporting that 23 women described having experienced a completed rape. With the control group, that number goes up to 65 out of all 893 participants so in just this one study they are saying that 7% of them were raped. This would make those students on that campus at a risk of many, many orde…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:26 AM
0

What exactly is the point in trying to corner someone into asserting incorrect information when you obviously already know why it's incorrect, and could simply tell them? The point is that it should be obvious to anyone that there is a problem with that 20-25% figure before you even look at it or verify the figures. If I told you that average household debt in the US was $565,000 for each family would you think “Bloody hell! That’s incredible!” or would you think “Hang on a fucking minute - how …
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:10 AM
1

Well, yes that goes without saying I agree. But that simply confirms my point that a rate of sexual assault that comes out that high needs to be examined more critically. In fact, if you look at the results for the resistance group in their table 2, you soon discover the following alarming factoid: out of 451 women in the group, 23 reported completed rape, 15 attempted rape, 34 any rape, 48 coercion, 67 attempted coercion, and 121 nonconsensual contact. Added together, that’s almost 70% of all t…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:05 AM
1

Yes, but that is a separate issue to the one I am pointing out. I am saying that even before the research was undertaken, that initial claim is so highly questionable and/or inaccurate that it skews the impact of the study whatever does or does not come next. So for example in their table 2, the combined number for both groups in the category of completed rape is 65. That means from 893 women involved in the study, 7.2% were classified as having been raped. For the control group only, the figure…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:57 AM
1

And really your first claim can probably fairly easily get refuted … Yes, I have no doubt that it can - especially as you appear to have just done a fairly good job in doing so. But should it have been excised on those grounds? The rules on the sidebar there do justify such a comment getting deleted. Absolutely not. I repeat the rule is: No generalisations insulting an identifiable group (feminists, MRAs, men, women, ethnic groups, etc) Where is the insult? Where is there even an intention to in…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:40 AM
1

Here’s to privilege!
/r/MensRights05/02/16 10:48 PM
1

Please read the sticky.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:31 PM
1

I’ve not come across the term 'regime flavour' before, but I think I know what you’re getting at. But the point I think I was trying to make is that the stated purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 12-hour programme in sexual assault prevention (and if I remember rightly, specifically in contrast to handing out printed literature in the form of brochures, or encouraging ‘bystander’ reporting/calling out). If that is the case then there is no possibility of the edit 12-hour program…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:30 PM
1

You don’t have time to ponder for a moment that there might be something wrong with a 20-25% reported sexual assault rate for women on college campuses? That doesn’t ring any alarm bells? Downvoting is quicker it’s true.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:38 PM
6

I get the impression quite a few of you guys are celebrating this as some kind of win for common sense? Is that right? Because if that is right and you are celebrating this then you must be out of your freaking minds. This is how that paper starts: Young women attending university 1, 2 face a substantial risk of being sexually assaulted. The incidence of sexual assault is estimated to be between 20% and 25% over a period of 4 years and to be highest during the first 2 years.3, 4 It’s just boldly…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:27 PM
0

Damn, if these are legit numbers this is very interesting info. Do you mean to say you agree with the paper’s first line and, indeed, premise?: Young women attending university 1, 2 face a substantial risk of being sexually assaulted. The incidence of sexual assault is estimated to be between 20% and 25% over a period of 4 years and to be highest during the first 2 years. 3, 4
/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:08 PM
5

My apologies for the misunderstanding There’s absolutely no need to apologise; it’s quite alright. If one goes online and types Mens Rights all sorts of things come up most of which are not very pleasant … Yes, this is a perennial issue. There are a number of reasons for this, but an important one is that the very existence of an MRM is seen as an affront to a great deal of Feminist activist and theorist thought. Through a deft application of a logical sleight of hand, the thinking goes somethin…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 02:34 PM
1

sounds familiar Puh-ha-ha-ha-ha ha Yes.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 07:47 PM
1

How else is the audience to know when they’re supposed to laugh?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:19 PM
11

I thought Mens Rights movement meant men wanting the respect they used to have in the past before things got to be as they are, … You are wrong here - I don’t know what that is, but isn’t about human rights and so is not relevant. The FAQ in the sidebar (also here) should disabuse you of that notion. Key issues revolve around: divorce settlements and especially child custody; male circumcision; quotas; educational policies that disadvantage boys or which treat boys behaviour as an issue that nee…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:10 PM
4

I’ve seen most of these before. The response suggested to the "Charge of Overgeneralization (Code Gray)" includes: Quotations from feminists, for example, can be easily obtained to prove this point. It should probably be pointed out the moment you do cite a specific source then this is the same moment when you are charged either with cherry-picking or else femsplained that the person you are quoting is not ‘a ‘real' feminist’ (cue bagpipes) or else they are ’second wave’ and they needed to be be…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:00 PM
6

I acknowledge as a white, cisgender person that my beliefs come from a ridiculously privileged place. Now, I know what you’re thinking - her comedy shows must absolutely rock the house right? Shocking as I know it must seem, you would in fact be dead wrong. This is part of her set: “I am pretty good at comedy." She has to remind us in case the audience get confused about what she’s doing on stage. “One time I was at a show and this male comedian - you’ve heard of them - he was like 'How did you …
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:45 PM
1

:-)
/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:19 AM
1

Yes, it’s right - it’s a new thing for children and for women’s safety. Children is obvious - even if not pregnant, having toddlers etc. can be a drag and being closer to the entrance helps. Women without children are also now allowed to park nearer the store so they don’t have to walk into dark recesses of the parking lot where they might be assaulted. Don’t remember where I read that, but it is a ‘thing’ - though I thought it was for supermarkets only, not car dealerships but anyway ...
/r/MensRights03/02/16 11:57 AM
1

I say it doesn't exist, they say it does and they bring up the thousands of untested rape kits as proof. I just find this bizarre - ‘rape culture’ is a culture in which pretty much everything in the environment tacitly encourages men to sexually assault women, and discourage women from voicing their complaints about it by blaming them for ‘asking for it’. The fact these rape kits have been coming to light surely proves the opposite? If we lived in a rape culture, the rape kits wouldn’t have exis…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:38 AM
12

I want then to haul me in or insist I update my desktop so I can bring up the fucking firemen calendar. Two wrongs don’t make a right as the HR staff in most modern offices will be very quick to point this out to you soon enough. In fact, by using your monitor to display that image you may even be in breach of a workspace protocol which your colleague isn’t as she has a print calendar (a print calendar is her property and can be removed; the monitor and whatever corporate screensaver is normally…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:25 AM
6

Has Twitter gone into meltdown yet?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:39 PM
2

What u/agent_of_entropy said, but also this: If any of you have a link to a legitimate news source or blog … “Law Student” / s
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:33 PM
2

I know it’s ridiculous, right? It actually makes it sound like he matters.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:28 PM
9

Great article. Less than one in every five teachers in WA primary schools is male, and some schools in the state have no male teachers in the classroom. While that has always been true, pretty much, there is nowadays almost certainly a more urgent need for a responsible adult male authority figure in children’s lives, especially in areas where many children are living with the mother only and where they may never have known their real father (and if they know any adult male at all, he may be a t…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:24 AM
3

She’s a 13 year-old girl receiving psychiatric treatment. What she did was profoundly wrong, but she’s a child. edit Have some compassion. If you want to be angry at someone, be angry at the system and culture that is trying to quash the possibility that sometimes people make shit up.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 05:25 AM
1

I thought this was a good video that makes a point, very clearly, that is an endless source of frustration when faced by yet another wave of untrue Scotsman. It reminded me of something Robert Stacy McCain said a while back: … my total cost for the 10 feminist books I’ve purchased in the past two months was $136.42, and this library of lunatic literature will keep growing. Why? Because if God will grant me another few months of life, I expect to make some appearances at university campuses next …
/r/MensRights01/02/16 05:13 AM
3

Fuck off twat.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:14 PM
4

This is very good, actually. The ‘glass waterfall’ vs. ‘glass cliff’ was a classic foot in mouth and as for her execrable joke about what atheists should name their children … Christ. Which brings me to a point I’ve raised on here before - how on Earth did she ever managed to get invited onto TV in the first place? Her 'comedy’ does such violence to the meaning of the word it begs the question as to whether it should be applied to her output at all and as far as her Feminist credentials go - wha…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:06 PM
2

“If you stand for equality, you're a feminist pro-life” Because, you know, what could possibly be more proof that you stand for equality for everyone than supporting the rights of an unborn child? [Urgent whispering] What? What do you mean feminists are pro-choice? [Even more urgent whispering] But that’s ridiculous! How can they be for equality for everyone and for abortion at the same time? NB Whole message = /s
/r/MensRights29/01/16 12:37 PM
1

I thought that was what you were going to say - are you also aware of what the average response rate is for surveys and questionnaires? A lot of researchers expect around a 10% response rate and are happy with anything higher than that. You won’t ever get a 100% return rate. The important point is how well the respondents you do get are representative of the group you are trying to get a sounding from - Obviously, if every respondent is a gender studies student with candy-coloured hair then the …
/r/MensRights29/01/16 07:12 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 12:26 AM
1

I think that the manosphere is on the verge of a civil war. Isn’t the ‘manosphere’ a derogatory term used by assholes for any and all men’s related groups they have dislike for (which is all of them)? Talking about a civil war in the manosphere makes about as much sense as talking about a civil war in the blackosphere. Most people here probably recall elevatorgate. It pretty much split the online atheist community in half. I suspect that the manosphere is on the verge of similar scandal since th…
/r/MensRights29/01/16 12:20 AM
1

If you look it up on google you'll actually find that one of the first links there on the first page is in fact to an earlier topic on it that I missed which is on the MensRights subreddit ironically. Sorry, I don’t understand this comment - if you look it up on Google it takes you to exactly the same link "that u/iiiq has put up there at the top of this thread” which I mentioned in the message above. However, on the second page, I discovered this: AVFM asks you to support Clementine Ford. Serio…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:20 AM
2

Maybe it was quite some time ago? Three months back apparently, see link at u/iiiq, above.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 11:59 PM
2

This is just a guess, but I reckon she might be lying. If you click on the link that u/iiiq has put up there at the top of this thread, sure enough there it is - 75 upvotes from 3 months back Report Clementine Ford's "Misandry Hour" podcast on iTunes for promoting hate speech against men and boys. (itunes.apple.com) by [deleted]. Admittedly, the top-voted comment is from u/creamyfrog and says: Shouldn't we be promoting freedom of speech even if what they say is detestable? Sorry but I find hate …
/r/MensRights27/01/16 11:58 PM
4

This case -- and continued feminist attempts to justify it -- should send a chill down the spine of every person who cares about free speech. It does. I wish I could get even a handful of social justice advocates to see this, but it seems to be nigh on impossible to draw them into a discussion of their principles or their activities without them assuming you are trying to attack them - not criticise them you understand, but annihilate them completely.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:44 PM
2

It would be interesting, but I doubt anything will.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:36 PM
1

Well, I would say it is as accurate as it can be. If the examples that lexicographers have identified as common usage betray sexist undercurrents in society, the blame lies with society, not the dictionary’s researchers and writers. It’s perfectly accurate according to English usage to say that a rapist is "typically a man” - people on this subreddit of all people should understand that’s true.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:35 PM
10

As a slight digression to your point - a popular explanation for the seemingly more pronounced characteristics of traditional femininity of Russian women is that following the war, there were so few men left that competition between women for the ‘good’ men (however that was defined) was particularly fierce. How true that is, I can’t say, but it was a popular belief well into the 90s.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:21 PM
6

How this ever got this far will be a mystery to me for years. How Steph Guthrie won’t get prosecuted for slander or defamation or something similar is likewise a mystery.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:17 PM
3

Hence ‘… fuck …' I am actually quite shocked at how many of the arguments are identical to the ones today. Did get a laugh out of the Feminist woman quoting the rule of thumb myth that Christina Hoff-Sommers pulled apart way back when … but which is still apparently being published in the same text books at university.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 09:50 PM
2

people are placing groups ahead of individuals That’s part of it for sure … and they’re certainly deductive and not inductive so they lead off from theory and intellectual frameworks and filter out any ‘messy’ outliers such as black Republicans or what have you.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 09:48 PM
7

Oxford Dictionaries initially responded flippantly to Oman-Reagan, replying to his criticism of its choice of “rabid feminist” with the tweet: “If only there were a word to describe how strongly you felt about feminism …” Puh-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha That’s fucking inspired. A shame they had to backtrack. Quick quiz for the ‘anthropologist’ in the story - fill in the blanks: He found himself in an arid [ ] under a burning, white hot [ ]. He’d had no water that morning so his throat was complet…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:21 PM
3

That’s 20 years ago … fuck ...
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:13 PM
5

Sure but it's a pretty good guess. We all work off of assumptions, it’s why stereotypes are largely harmless so long as people are flexible with them. But I know what this guy means, it’s when people insist that because you’re gay you have to vote for Hillary, or because you’re black you have to agree with BlackLivesMatter and all that crap. That’s when it gets sinister and that’s when - ironically when you think about it - the true colours of the social justice crowd really show themselves. Eve…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:00 PM
6

That's pretty much how it works… Yup. Try being a black conservative voter (in the UK anyway) or Labour voter that thinks Feminists have got it all ass-backwards … Don’t know Andrew Sullivan; Milo’s hugely entertaining, but that kind of extreme cuts both ways. Could do with other voices.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:31 PM
1

I’m sure he does, it was just a joke.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 10:55 AM
25

This quote is a gem: “… as soon as you tell people you’re gay, they’ll tell you what you think,” he said. “Just from the fact that I’m gay, people assumed I endorsed all their positions about whatever.”
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:20 AM
10

I work in an industry where my genitalia call for suspicion distrust Jesus, where do you work? Hooters? Sorry, more seriously: "where are all the MRAs advocating for Gay Rights? Men of Color? Trans Men? Male Rape Victims? Or are they too busy harassing feminists online?” This is a canard, and an old one at that, and it comes round as regularly as Sunday follows Saturday. Gay men, men of colour and trans-men are all men - so at the points at which all these men share a common experience as men, t…
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:33 PM
8

And yet she still has a job … teaching journalism. I wonder if there’s some kind of pipeline of students going directly from her MA programme into Buzzfeed?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 07:55 AM
3

This may help clarify your problem, u/WhiteHarem.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 09:57 PM
1

Woman and feminist are synonymous in their terms, so ...
/r/MensRights22/01/16 02:34 PM
1

… trying to discredit everybody who disagrees with her Disagreeing with a Feminist is taken as de facto prove of misogyny - didn’t you know ; - )?
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:52 PM
1

A well-placed rant with just the right degree of hearty indignation can do wonders for the soul can’t it? (Not being sarcastic, by the way; Verbal pyrotechnics like that can be a real pleasure to read or hear when done right). Like so many things, running a business looks easy from the outside. On the eve of the Bolshevik revolution, V. I. Lenin declared that “accounting and control” were the key factors in running an enterprise and that capitalism had already “reduced” the administration of bus…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:50 PM
3

Yes, the profit-seeking companies of the world aren't maximizing shareholder value the right way. They need the twentysomething literary-studies student who has never held a real job to tell them exactly the right way to do it. Well, of course - they have opened their minds to Progress with a capital ‘P’. One cannot expect to see progress from people who’s attitude can be summed up, more or less, as ‘if ain’t broke, don’t fix it’. Hold on-- is capitalism a good thing or a bad thing now? I though…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 11:30 AM
1

Damn, forgot about that - sorry.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 08:28 AM
2

Yup.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 08:27 AM
6

The author, edit Ruby Stockham, "has a Masters degree in Modern Literature”, and is therefore more than adequately qualified to share her ruminations with the world on government policy and labour law. From the article: the low proportion of women in top jobs shows us that great women are regularly and systematically being passed over for average men That’s the only possible reason considered. The 2014 Davies Review states proudly that ‘women’s representation on FTSE 100 boards now stands at 20.…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 08:13 AM
2

"But daddy! I TRIED working, and I didn't like it!" Heh. But Karen, she’s a "is a fearless advocate for women’s rights”, fearless I tell you - don’t you believe her or something? Charlotte welcomes instructions on legal cases, and invitations for media engagements, public speaking events and the opportunity to support campaigns How ever does she cope with being welcomed onto "male dominated … repressive institutions” like the media?
/r/MensRights22/01/16 07:52 AM
1

when anybody commits sexual assault on a minor it is highly unlikely to involve jumping a stranger on a dark night on an unlit path We should probably draw this to a close now - no disrespect intended in my saying that - but a minor can be anyone up to the age of 18 (in my country anyway). Minors in their teenage years most certainly can be and are victims of violent and/or sexual assaults involving strangers.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:29 AM
1

He forgot to mention the ritualised blow-by-blow recitation of ugly messages they’ve received on social media. Book launches, promotional tours, conferences, talks, lectures - you can guarantee that however long the presentation and however irrelevant it will be, they’ll find a way to waste a good 25% of the time just reading that shit out loud like it was psalm. Nice work if you can get it.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:26 AM
2

These are all fair points - especially the one about changes since c. 2008. Still, caution shouldn’t be confused with pessimism, and we’re speculating (or at least I am) about the precise cause of that fall from 14% to 7%. I only skimmed the report very briefly, but something that stood out to me was this: A significant majority (83%) of the British public support equality of opportunity for women – this included even higher support from men (86%) than women (81%). Although more women (12%) comp…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:16 AM
1

I maintain that you should have assumed it was an innocent situation from the beginning. From where I’m standing, you seem not to be drawing a distinction between the persons and the action. A Polish-speaking man in his 50s on a bicycle is an everyday sight in my neighbourhood and arouses no suspicion whatsoever. What he appeared to be doing (which I won’t repeat as your well aware of it by now) - and stress on appeared by the way - was what made me suspicious. A suspicion is just that; it’s nei…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:04 AM
1

Probably more men than women assault joggers in public unprovoked at night OK, agreed. But you're talking about a tiny fraction of the slow bike riding population How on Earth does his bike prevent him from being a potential threat? The point about him cycling slowly was that he could keep pace with her, but slightly to the back of her, dogging her heels: But to her side there was a much older bloke who was maybe in his 50s, on a bicycle wobbling around at her side and slightly to the back const…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 10:33 AM
1

Yes, I read and reread the anecdote … So no, no titter of suspicion, or certainly not enough to start chasing after them. To be fair, what I actually said was: I started picking up the pace and jogging after them to keep them in sight. Keeping them in sight is quite a long way from "chasing after them” and bear in mind that at no point did I actually say or do anything as by keeping them in sight it became very evident that this was a parent (or close relative) and child. In any case, I am gener…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 10:25 AM
1

Because the overwhelming likelihood is that there is nothing going on … I’m sorry, but did you actually read the anecdote I wrote? I’m incredulous that under the same circumstances - and unlit stretch of road, a young girl in sports gear running with head down not acknowledging or even looking across at an older man, on a bike, who despite the fact that he is constantly talking to her, she makes no sign of acknowledging him? That doesn’t raise even a titter of suspicion in your mind? You would r…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:14 AM
2

Faith in humanity restored somewhat I hate to ruin your buzz, but as I said to someone in another thread the other day, it’s not that important that only a small percentage who identify as Feminists because it’s which people that matters. It is quite self-evident that Feminism has a very strong influence, for example, not just The Guardian and the BBC but other mainstream papers and all of the main UK political parties as well as the law and academia. I went to a conference a couple of months ag…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter