TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Leftmost_CaramelKofi Archive

View 2 posts and 145 comments by Leftmost_CaramelKofi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Yes, obviously they are. You just have to talk to people (just one person) that aren't woke-brainwashed to see how obvious it is. (Answering solely to your title, op)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 05:23 PM
7

We call it "child soldier" so that people care which is crazy in and out of itself. But calling it Boy soldier (which is much more accurate and relevant) will only trigger overt indifference. Sadly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 04:26 AM
7

No we absolutely don't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 07:24 AM
2

They obviously feed of each other. But at the eod, manosphere grifters lest a few lost boys of 50$ while proving their inadequacies (both the guru's and follower's) While Establishment Feminism work double overtime to make sure boys and men lives literally receive less resources, are treated as suspects by default, and hushed away of professional opportunities...all under the guise of fighting the good and moral fight for society...while constantly demonizing, antagonizing and creating negative …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 06:57 AM
2

Obviously and openly so, I might add. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 04:58 AM
2

Feminism don't own left-wing ideologies. And feminism (especially the modern online-based mix) isn't the only to support gender equality. They just claim it so. Feel free to exercise some independent and critical thinking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/26 11:43 AM
1

It is. Very much so. And If you insist and ignore your intuitions/warnings, it will cost you, ultimately burn you and isolate you. They 100% won't support you thru any of it all. Just for the explicit reason of your genitalia. Your behavior, work and ideological affiliation won't matter even a little because ultimately it is very much an essentialist and tribalist community. Feminism as an ideology, feminist activists in "public" and feminist activists behind closed doors...are THREE ENTIRE DIFF…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/26 11:38 AM
2

That's the secret. You kinda don't. Mediocrity is rampant in our society and it's hard to not see it, at some point. Just learn to stay open-minded and give benefit of doubt in case you stumble upon a gem. 🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 05:05 PM
5

Incredibly simple but based advice in this crazy timeline.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 11:08 AM
3

Yes it very much is sexist. You're simply learning, at your expense, that these activist are full of sh1t. Perfect ideals, terrible execution and zero reflexivity. When you boil it downs, all that is left is gender tribalism and latent female chauvinism🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️ Sorry you found out that way, tho
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 11:08 AM
1

This say nothing at all except that feminists really struggle with mathematics, sorry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/26 08:54 PM
14

What the actual F !?!?!?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 01:15 AM
1

Yes. And I said literally all countries will always abolish men's right to bodily autonomy to send them die as cannon fodder in a pinch. Because I meant literally all countries. Every time. If you know the exceptions please let me know so I can move there, 'cause we clearly circling the drain and nearing the end of a cycle in western countries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/26 03:20 PM
1

Yes, literally all countries. Just wait until there is an actual war. And then you'll see who's right to bodily autonomy is recinded with the quickness. Drafting women to send them to logistics and accounting isnt a draft.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/26 07:09 AM
4

Don't make me tap the sign, guys. :P While some activist feminists definitely care about women survivors and dedicate their whole life to alleviate their pain. The hegemonic part of the mvt only care about women's pain/prejudice insofar it justifies them punishing-blaming (some) men.🤷‍♂️ They don't care to actually "solve" the issue. Of all the 4 gendered directions a crime/offense can follow, feminist only care about ONE. People usually think they only care about female victims or about blaming…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/26 06:56 AM
11

Are feminists implying men’s basic rights in the justice system should be tossed out the window at-least in rape cases? Literally their endgame, yeah. It also come from a deep seated (sexist) belief that women are actually morally superior to men so false accusation will never be a serious issue*. Also they never lie, make mistake, or wrongly remember.🤷‍♂️ *(every research show that institutional violence is women's favorite form of violence but it becomes false if you just ignore inconvenient r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/26 06:45 AM
11

Saw this endgame coming a mile away the minute they started to try and shove w0men into a minority demographic...talking about "minored gender identity", or "w0men and OTHER marginalized gender identity". Like how tf you gon make 51% of any population (world, country, city) into a minority ? And how is calling them a minority any progress toward emancipation/equal standing ?? Answer: it doesn't, unless thru protected class status. Ppl don't realize that protecting a class, in law, defacto antago…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/26 05:23 PM
22

If, as many feminists now advocate, mere accusations of wrong-doing (typically only sexual in nature, arbitrarily, for other crimes, a more rigorous standard of evidence is maintained) from women are enough to topple men It's not a bug, it's a feature. Of all the 4 gendered directions a crime/offense can follow, feminist only care about ONE. People usually think they only care about female victims or about blaming men. It's not. It's BOTH simultaneously. But only both TOGETHER. ⬇️Offender's gend…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/26 07:26 AM
2

Pure sexist and pandering initiative. This is disgusting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 11:19 PM
7

Mortality and value of their lives : male death is simply not considered the same tragedy as women's death. Often ignored. Unadressed. 9x homicide rate worldwide, 2x public violent assault in western countries, 3x suicide rate. And yet, the only talk about public safety is about w0men's safety in the public space. Men death is degendered before being erased. Road death is a gender issue. And so are work-related death. People even come up with pseudo-evolutionary tautological argument as to why t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 07:54 PM
1

Big agree to all this. But abiding by all these constraints and performing all this lengthy oratory precautions and disambiguations before you even said anything is a HEAVY TAX, like you aptly put it. And it's diluting, even preventing the deep dive/complexity/nuance some topics require. It's also an endless task as your detractors are simply not engaging in good faith. Constantly showing a clean a pair of hands mean you still conceive yourself as a plausible suspect. Like you have to prove your…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 07:28 PM
1

Nice endearing news. Thanks for sharing !
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 08:42 AM
1

I expressed my thoughts similarly when I was a teenager, Same, honestly. Which is why I allow myself to raise this point here. I been there. Making paragraph long sentences, vomiting thesaurus in dissertation and sh1t. Because precision is indeed paramount. Then your teacher push you to do better. And none of your perfectly educated classmates understand you. 🤷‍♂️ And you finally understand that being able to be concise and understood actually ENRICH your discourse instead of amputating it or "d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 08:40 AM
27

Big agree on disregarding their mediocre analysis. But also, these people offer a proper window on the modal opinion. Litteral NPC normie take, they just work on phrasing, presentation, cherry-picked sources better. Ignoring them won't change the prevalence of their stance in society and general public. Sooo, disregard them but also don't ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 07:52 AM
1

Yes, why ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:01 PM
0

The date analogy was...an analogy? Lenght doesn't equal depth, nuance or complexity. It's been the whole point of my post. Forums are meant for discussions. Wall of texts don't breed discussion. And they favor quid proquo as you cannot, in text, adress the stance (lest you provide an encompassing even longer wall of text).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:00 PM
0

Random non-related loaded question. Lame. This was never the point or topic. Do better or bait smarter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 11:53 AM
1

Yeah, for some reasons, I was under the impression everybody here was serious about this sub topic (why bother committing/contributing on such "niche" topic otherwise). Some answers definitely shown me otherwise 🤣🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 11:51 AM
1

Link me to anything you've ever written that has any depth. You wouldn't get it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 11:42 AM
0

And again I ask: Have you considered not living for likes and optics ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 11:38 AM
-1

Isn't it crazy that you claim to be a good mature reader but prove completely unable to keep track of a topic/conversation ? No call for scrutiny in post or thread. No rejection of complexity (explicitly the opposite happened). Exclusionary =/= To formally exclude people Talking about strawman then making up whole complaints, tantrums and aversion when there is none is ironic and rich af. Maybe try reading some higher quality stuff ? Your current level is not as high as you think, friend. But I …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:26 AM
1

🤣🤣🥱🥱 People seems to be discussing the point I raised to quite constructive fruition. There just you and the other teenager that seem quite pressed I dared to raise a "critic"/observation about this sub. What a disaster indeed 🤡 Have you consider not living for likes and optics ? Do you have some more pedantic arrogance for me, pls, tho ? Don't hesitate to throw in a very complex mature long-worded argument, while you at it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:19 AM
1

Also having a virtual community that only works for those that "actually enjoy reading and can do so quickly" is quite exclusionary. If said community is to be about men's issues, then it becomes flat out hypocritical since literacy, low school achievement and school dropout is among top men's issues in modern society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:48 AM
0

🥱🥱🥱🥱 And here I thought you had an actual point to make. I just got done with the angsty teen on the other subthread. And now I have to deal with your sterile pedantic "advice". Sorry my FOMO is too big to just disconnect mid-convo when anything is slightly inconvenient. I'll try to be more mature like you in the future and log out of anything that don't go directly in my direction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:46 AM
0

Indeed. And it's a very valid feeling and desire. Which get me wondering why the TextWalls, since they tend to drive people away...aren't you achieving the OPPOSITE of what is sought. A bit like talking way too much on a first date. Like we get it and appreciate it, you're excited to connect and meet new ppl...Completely understandable....maybe don't smother them away ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:33 AM
2

Indeed. Oratory precautions (that men HAVE to use when talking abt gender lest they get suspected, accused, derailed or dismissed) do take a lot of space and words in these TextWalls post I'm referring to. I wonder if we could achieve, at least in here amongst ourselves, give each other some grace and presumption of benevolence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:30 AM
1

Big agree. It's sidetrack to OP but the discussion about "online speech" tend to act as if those stance stayed online. Sure there are a lot of bot and trolls but it's not all. Actual people are wading thru. And sure enough, after a few years (it usually take 2yrs in my intuitive observation), the online talking points slowly sip into "real people" mouth. Always uncredited. So yes, the hateful divisive online rhetoric do yield IRL results thru one's entourage, friends, work climate, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:28 AM
0

What if some of the long posts steer toward rambling instead of "well-articulated mature dialogue", tho ?? The issue is that opened topics tend to not be re-open (not before sometime has passed) and the people that have contributed won't come back on the new iterations. So it divides the overall quality of convos.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:19 AM
1

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:12 AM
1

That's very true. I do see and read that, even here between ourselves, oratory precautions take a whole lot of place/word volume whenever men try to speak about genders and gender dynamics. It's sad. Goes to show how internalized the General Suspicion against men is. Even here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:11 AM
1

Fair point. Do we have a wikipedia, wiki or any equivalent dedicated to men's issues from a defiministed perspective ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:06 AM
2

Indeed. A mandatory TLDR for 300+ posts would be very nice and a reasonable effort to ask, I think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 11:47 PM
1

Big agree. I can easily how that could become classist in some fashion tho. But there don't seem to be any rule/consensus to push contributors toward such minimum standards of structure and editorial ethics🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 11:42 PM
1

I understand. But this is a forum. We're not publishing laws and the TextWalls in here as not nearly as practical/operation/groundbreaking as you make it sound. Lastly, since it's a political forum, spreading the good ideas would be preferable over achieving a perfect paint seen by only 3 person, no ? Finally, your comment seem to imply that populist ideology veer toward short content...and that TextWall cannot be populist smh. This is simply false. The movement we spend quite some time criticiz…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 11:39 PM
1

Then don't make a post about them ? You keep sounding like an angsty unsufferable teen. I just want to make it explicitly clear your tone and sermoning is meaningless to me. You're not intimidating or making any point. If you can't understand how it's annoying for the community when a guest at the wedding claim 30min for an average speech that would be just as good, if not better, in 10min...that's on you. I can't help further. Your analogy between a forum (interactive) and a library(extractive)…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 11:33 PM
-4

Ngl, Friend...You're interacting with me like an edgy high-schooler from the get go. It's getting old.🥱😮‍💨 To answer: while I wish I read better and faster than I do, I can read just fine. It's still a time and cognitive investment. A very uncertain one. I can invest my evening in ONE long ass post and it's answers...or read and partake in 10 others for the same resources investment. The 10 often win over the 1, unsurprisingly. 🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 06:54 AM
7

Indeed. Fair point indeed you're making here. This perspective had escaped me yet it's literally me you're describing 🤗🔥🫂🫂 Thanks for cooking. It will help me be more patient.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 06:49 AM
3

Big agree. That's usually my tag line that not every analysis can be a tweet or a reel. But again, I'm talking about simple points being worded ad libidum. Expanded. The informational density is simply not there. I don't wanna post the link and demonstrate as that would be rude but every evening, I scroll past 1 or 2 post that are 6 paragraph/600words long...except no new items, central thoughts is added to the topic/problematic past the 2nd/3rd one... The cost/benefit seems odd to me as it is m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 06:29 AM
-4

To print out whole books and personal essay of 600words ?? Textwall that could be synthesized faithfully in 100words without losing any depth or items ? Nah, I disagree. I mean, just cause you can does it mean you should🤷‍♂️ At some point, it's like: do you want to converse and engage...or do you want to publish a manifesto and go away ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 06:23 AM
-1

I fully understand that. And much appreciate in here actually. I'm usually the wordy-chatty one among my peers. But like I said, 700words to finally ask "why feminist struggle with the notion of statistical normal distribution in people behaviors?" seem quite much... I guess what I wonder, deep down, is: Where do they find the confidence/assurance that someone will pause on THEIR text wall and engage ?? Do y'all read all of it before engaging or you just jump in based on post Title and vibes ??
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 06:16 AM
3

Indeed. There's that. But the contrast with the other leftist-gender-focused feminist forum I used to hang out at is STARK. They were talking PLENTY, some more than others. But there was this collective understanding that, even in text, the mic need to pass around for a conversation to happen and be alive (It was another platform, tho, I understand how Reddit UI might nudge you to textwall)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 06:11 AM
1

It's not shitpost, damn it. It's a genuine question I'm asking to the sub ...y'all seem far more warm and welcoming when I read, usually 😭😢 Wait. Are you seriously pretending you don't see what I'm talking about ???
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 06:07 AM
1

Another non-negligible hypothesis is the standard age gap in heterosexual couple, especially in traditional country/generation. Meaning she quite younger when he dies, so much better health, ability to self-sustain...but also a predicted death for him Conversely he'd be typically older when she dies, which might imply tragedy (untimely accident or sickness) and much less ability for the older dude to self-care, keep on and move on. Like you said, so many hypothesis to test, interesting underlyin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 04:20 AM
2

FINALLY.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 05:45 PM
7

"Slightly" more?? Bro... To a significant amount, the cope become their entire personality and ideology. The other factors are very true too (especially width, depth and warm of non-romantic relationships and social support system). But the copium is real too. And barely ever discussed. Men typically don't devolve to such level of performative speech unless you reach Incel/MGTOW territory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 11:26 AM
2

Obvious and we all know it. But glad it is now firmly documented.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/26 07:46 PM
19

Emotional labor is discussed as a gendered issues meanwhile married men been dealing since forever with mentally unstable partners and giving endless reassurance that "you're not fat, it's the dress" while having their sex/intimate life chronically neglected and simply enduring the dead bedroom. But somehow...none of this account as "emotional labor"🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 10:44 AM
9

It's very true and aptly worded...but reality even worse than that. As issues that are addressed as gendered often affect men significantly (with the exception of uterine issue)...but they simply are ignored. E g. Whole month and 10x budget for breast cancer (indeed gendered issue) when prostate cancer kills the same amount of ppl...but they are men Rape is addressed as gendered issue but incarcerated men are left to deal with torture level of sexual assault (to rate that would equalized victim …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 10:38 AM
1

Wow...!! 😳😳
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/26 05:14 PM
3

Sheer bigotry. Wow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/26 04:33 AM
3

EXACTLY TRUE !! You have no idea how right you are. It truly has the same structure, the same substance (none), the same hidden reality. And it serve the same rhetorical purpose in their rhetorical paradigm: to dismiss entirely an aspect of reality they simply are uncomfortable with and unequipped/unwilling to deal with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/26 07:47 AM
1

The. Actually. Fvck!?!?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/26 08:41 AM
7

Let him cook!!🔥🔥
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/25 06:03 PM
50

Men's libido, sex drive, fantaisies and sexuality is seen as perverted and illegitimate by default. No matter what it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 08:38 PM
9

Look at all this male privilege!!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 08:57 AM
29

This is so real. I would even say it's a male thing more than a white thing. Cause as a millenial male trying to get into ANY affordable IT program in late 2010's I really felt those doors slammed on my nose. The "disadvantaged" part of my identity did nothing. All these bigots saw was my genitalia and gender. On one side, everybody was saying IT industry is in dire need for motivated new talents(this was before Covid and AI tidal wave). And then all accessible programs were rejecting anything m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 03:31 AM
5

Of the many BS the redpill spaces are filled to the brim with, that one concept of "Congenital Discontentment" always struck my curiosity. Regardless of how ill-named, inexact it is. You just can't make some people happy or satisfied, individually. Much less as a group. Much less as such a large group as half of humankind. Add to that an ideology that attract the most disagreeable and neurotic individuals of its target demographic...and you quickly realize that relying on feminist "satisfaction"…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 11:34 PM
2

It's very good and working analogy. That again does nothing to negate or alleviate the antisemitic conspiracy theory that jewish secret almighty people create feminism (because traditional West was perfect and fine, as we all know) to destroy the west (via proxy of gender war) so they can finally take over.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 10:54 PM
10

We are inexorably moving toward a complete gender segregation of the economy and social life. And w0men are leading the charge and asking for more. Then men will start doing it too, with massive backlash and public outcry. For the worst. But it will ultimately happen anyway. Which will ironically only make relationship even worse cause now men and w0men will be completely foreign to each other for most of their lives So many years and decade spent belittling fundamentalist muslim countries only …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 10:49 PM
5

Agree it is biased reporting but the fact that this level of BS was even suggested is noteworthy, when it comes to this ideology and organizations. 🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 10:32 PM
7

Sometime when you look at this type of sh!t, you need to ask yourself: if I wanted to purposefully make the organization/movement FAIL, lose momentum and adhesion...but didn't want to be caught and blamed ever...how would I do anything different than this ?? If you can't come up with an answer, no need to ponder further. Dismiss it entirely and move on with your life. You're dealing with extreme incompetency.🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️ Extreme incompetency is often time indistinguishable from secret conspiration (…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 10:31 PM
2

Yes, but then that would be an honest, precise and accurate depiction of reality. Allowing to call for action, efficiently allocate resources and trigger a proper public debate. Even at the risk of highlighting a often untold female privilege. Late stage populist feminism simply can't have that. The goal is to attract and hoard resources for long term subsidized e-mail job which impact are hard to measure. It's also important that w0men be THE ONLY ones allowed any sort of victim status. Forever…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 07:49 AM
1

Hi, sorry for late reply, mate. I don't connect often: Here is all I remember of it, in the most structured way I can. I'm defo sure IT WASN'T mandela effect as I remember vividly people and feminists being stumped whenever I'd pull it up. The study was done around 2015 (between 2012 and 2017 for good measure). The data collection was DEFINITELY done in Montreal, Quebec in Canada on female students. Can't remember if it was "Université de Montréal (UdeM)", UQAM or McGill Uni. Study might have be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/25 05:32 AM
1

Unfortunately, I can't seem to find it back. Very frustrating (just spent 01h30 trying to). I remember it quite vividly, tho. Because the results were that shocking/surprising to me. Do you want me to tell you all I remember of it? Maybe you'll have better luck/ressources/techniques finding it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 08:33 PM
6

That's crazy. Absolutely disgusting and crazy. Wow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/25 10:36 PM
27

Yes, it's very true and I would argue it goes even further than that. With the abundant use of "framing" in Feminismt rhetoric. You start to talk about an area of life at the exact moment it's convenient for your "victim/discrimination' narrative. Never earlier, never further. Even if zooming in or out would be key to solve said issue. Because they want to be right much more than they want anything solved.🤷‍♂️ My favorite example of this is with the hoax of STEM and the ever-lasting lack of w0me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/25 08:33 AM
1

There is no point arguing with such biggots, I would say. She'll sheepishly change her mind when her tought leaders update their believes and make it cool again to not be a total sociopathic A-hole to men's issues🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/25 07:25 AM
5

I especially hate it when the try to reframe homophobia as some variation of misoginy. Like...LOOK AT THE FUKKEEN DATA, would you ? Everywhere in the world were homosexuality is demonized and criminalized, it's thru male-specific laws, inspection, persecutions, arrest and execution. Two w0men live together and history will call them roomates. Gay men have to fake entire mariage with children...but somehow they still find a way to make their plight about w0men, still. It's crazy. And don't even g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/25 01:01 AM
2

This be the type of "partner" that require you wear some torture belt because they have painful period or childbirth. Utterly deranged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/25 12:39 AM
2

This be the type of "partner" that require you wear some torture belt because they have painful period or childbirth. Utterly deranged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/25 12:29 AM
3

Don't ever forget that 2015 Montreal study on female students sexual behavior that revealed 4 out of 5 of them not only raped a man (using host of strategies from alcohol to emotional blackmail) but were brash enough to brag about it and describe it in the study...to the researchers. The craziest part is that these unchecked predatory literally circle back to bite them in the ass since these male survivors then learn to downplay consent thru downplaying then own...until they do it on someone els…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/25 12:26 AM
1

Exactly
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/25 07:46 PM
2

Very interesting perspective, indeed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/25 07:45 PM
2

It is aboslutely valid. And the way hegemonic feminism tries its darndest to gaslight EVERYONE into thinking male-oriented homophobia is rooted in misoginy (because these gay men would be "passive" and "penetrated" like women) is simply ridiculous and disingenuous. Worldwide, countries with homophobic laws and repression are against men solely/mostly. Men get their anuses forcefully inspected. W0men lesbian still face social rejection and obvious threat of sex crimes...BUT THE POLICE CHASE AFTER…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/25 07:33 PM
1

That's YOUR perspective. Go sell hole if it's such easy money. Even if we admit your stance as true: you still way off-topic, friend. What does any of this have to do with OP and the initial convo ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 04:10 AM
2

Damn. You guys are cooking hot ! 🔥🔥
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 03:53 PM
1

Yes, and ? What does that have to do with OP, gender equality or my comment ? You think prositution (which is mainly feminine) is 100% voluntary ? Then what ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 03:46 PM
1

Maybe just read the comments before obsessing into a contrarian stance, bro, idk. Also, a draft is a draft. Not the same circumstances or criteria at all. And also: I just want a world where they can join (or be equally drafted, ffs!) without needless obstacles Some ppl want to join the army. Some don't. Some people can, some can't. That is the status quo for peace time. And it comes with its specific mechanics. When Shit Hit the Fan or all-out war break out, everything changes. And the rule as …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 05:33 AM
-1

"So be it" also means meritocracy would prevail. To get in, to get promoted, etc. We don't lower the bar to satisfy any unfit group or any under-represented demographic. We question the bar to make sure it's bias-free. Also, a draft is a draft. Not the same circumstances or criteria at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 11:31 PM
1

You're right that I mispoke in talking of a "wave of violence". Feminist have always been violent. And moving in masses and waves to dilute accountability. It's just that society have a "masculine-only" blinder on when we think about violence. What we usually refer as the whole spectrum of "violences" are just the masculine form of it (the forms men tend to use). With the bene-sexist idea that women are just that much less violent. Which is bs and refusing to see them as full human beings. It's …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 10:22 PM
1

I don’t think this is just feminism. I think it’s the female drive to select men made clear and plain and taken to the logical extreme. This. Entirely this. A very unadressed latent dynamic of the feminist movement and modern feminity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 07:04 AM
2

It was Sweden or Finland. And yes, the open secret in "serious" feminist circles is that these "get in STEM" campaign systematically fail. Miserably and expansively. Their sole purpose is to justify the jobs of some subsidized feminist "non-profit" that somehow...all have communication degree and never thought of joining the STEM themselves and beat the stereotypes. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️ US Military tried the "inclusive" recruitement approach, which led to the lowest recruitement rates ever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 06:11 AM
10

Yeah. Cases are still sporadic and the media framing on them still follow the "offended victim overreacted to pig mal abuser" narrative. This type of title just have to much emotional clickbait power, rn. In France, few years ago, it was a girl that killed a dude after he said something slick (or touch her bum) in the street, at the bus stop. She pushed him to the ground and kicked his head until he died. Feminists cheered and argued self-defense. But soon enough (4 to 10yrs) the violence will b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 04:22 AM
13

It does is my prediction that we are about 4 to 10years away from the first wave of feminist violent act against men. So many people fail to realize that genocide (as quick as they can effectively happen) are ALWAYS built up over decades, if not a whole century (for the case of Rwanda).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 07:49 PM
17

That's not the deal he proposes, tho. It's not just "going back to work"...it's being the sole breadwinner of household and let the other partner in decisive charge of everything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 07:42 PM
20

The fact that you NEVER heard (not even a story or testimony of) a SAHM beg her husband to "switch" (she goes to work and he stays home) tell you everything you need to know about the scam of "female domestic exploitation". If it's so bad. Let's switch.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 07:39 PM
14

At some point, in your journey as a male feminist or leftwing dude...being faced with wokism contradictions day-in day-out you realize you really stand at a fork that they forced you in: Lose your sanity trying to content miserable people that don't even know what would satisfy them. And their antagonistic, antinomic injunctions. Disregard these imbeciles and all the foul, vile, baseless dumbsh1t they take pleasure and catharsis in saying🤷‍♂️ Which way, Left Wing Man ?? Deep down these people ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 07:35 PM
4

To me, as of right now (where Im at thinking about all this stuff and engagings for the past 15years)....it boils down to the strenght of stereotypes: Can a man show up to babysit your daughters without you clutching your pearls, freaking out ? Can a woman work in construction without being constantly questionned ? If there is doubt, why ? Are they legit ? How do we adress them in a way that don't deprive half humanity of their agency and freedom. All the rest is just BS "blank slate humanoid" t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 07:18 PM
11

Nice one ! 🤣🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 04:47 AM
1

Of course you would pull out this type of resources/links🤣 Like I said: One that is a sincere stance/protest, not some meta-critic, discourse critic or rhetorical performance. Online feminist has been hegemonic for the past 15years. That's how long they completely ignored, dismissed men's issues and even attacked the people that dared to care. In this context: 3rd link (Afrodizjha) came out a month ago, when the Male Loneliness Epidemic, dating crisis, suicides rates and mental health crisis hav…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 06:22 PM
2

Dude, a dowry is a wealth transfer from the Bride('s family) to the Groom('s family)... Tf are you on ? And please, can you tell me more about the Dowry practices (or wtv you meant) in Dominican Republic, I'm trying to see something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 03:42 PM
1

Every single time a feminist with more than 3 Twitter followers speaks about men Wait, so you're claiming every time a "feminist with more than 3 twitter followers speaks about men"...other feminists come to raise one of the 3 issues I named above ? Is that your claim? Can you show me JUST ONE of these tweets, then ?? Of an acknowledged popular feminists raising any of THESE 3 aspects of gender equality. Just one, pls. One that is a sincere stance/protest, not some meta-critic, discourse critic …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 03:21 PM
2

Beside gRape and sexual assault*, name ONE crime w0men are the main victims of ?? (*and even for those, it's only due to statistical manipulation and legal bias basically artificially excluding w0men from data even when they are the predators and excluding boys and men from victimhood even when they clearly been SA'd)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 03:13 PM
2

Well the whole movement is made of grifters, then, according to your logic. Now what ? Keywords: "according to your logic" Previous comment was making a grotesque No True Scottman Fallacy, I simply fed into it to make a point. You can unerect your righteous nipples, now. The issue with this movement is not the paradigm (altough the paradigm do have its glaring flaws), it's the rampant mediocrity within its ranks, complacency toward said mediocrity and lack of integrity (actual adhesion to preten…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 02:37 PM
2

I did meant "left", tho. As in leftwing, pro-social political agenda, socialist, state services, access to care, etc. I've been socialized in Europe where these words have actual meaning and history and didn't got brainwashed into seeing them as slurs to sneer at. But you do are right in a sense. Liberals posing as leftist and the political left being conflated with de hedonistic-based individualistic libt@rd mindset/agenda is a big issue. To me, specifically. As it turns people around me into a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 02:25 PM
2

Well the whole movement is made of grifters, then, according to your logic. Now what ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 04:34 AM
1

You really gave this some thoughts ! Wow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 04:21 AM
2

Until the Tara Reade allegations. Then every one of those people pronounced that they couldn't vote for a rapist. They could vote for someone direct responsible for killing, impoverishing, and oppressing millions. Indeed these people display the most upside-down sense of priority, sometimes. They took the 2010-wokism era's motto of "No struggle hierarchy" a little bit too serious. Like, some politician embezzling millions is "okay" but even the slighest shadiest gr@pe accusation (not talking Tar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 03:50 AM
2

I see what you mean about the body keeping scores part, yeah.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 03:44 AM
1

but the political left is corrosive and hypercritical without producing or really even proposing means for enlarging happiness and purchasing power for common people, so I think it is healthy to distance oneself from it You damn right: corrosive and sterile af. For no valid reason 😫
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 03:05 AM
1

I think if you consider half the political spectrum as having a political ideology that only breeds ass-kissing and incompetence You should make sure you read and understand the WHOLE sentence you get that interpretation from: Also yall tend to have a very weird fondness for hierarchy, authority and ultimately feodalism which only breed ass-kissing and incompetence. I despise both. 😔 I don't think ALL rightwing idpol ONLY produce that. I said hierarchy, authority and feodalism in ideological gro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 03:04 AM
2

you don't necessarily need to find like minds to hangout with to confirm your own beliefs, and you might find that people who you share many beliefs and principles with, are just unbearable to be around for any number of random reasons, and the Mormon next door hosts the best game nights. Refreshing perspectives to consider indeed ! Thanks I guess I do seek like-minded people for affinity's sake and also deepening my opinions and perspectives thru convo and debate...not being forced by group-thi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 01:58 AM
2

😔😔😔🥺 Damn bro, Im sorry it gets to you so bad. But indeed it gets demoralizing, at times. You should care because you got at least yourself to fight for. Like you'd fight for a friend. Like you'd want a friend to fight for you. Like, if you not sure or unmotivated about how to treat yourself...then treat yourself as a friend. As a friend you need to care for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 01:45 AM
2

🤣🤣🤣 Funny ! But just in case you're serious: "left wing" refer to the left side of political spectrum and political ideologies. Anything socialist, marxist feminist, anarcho-communist, etc. People that want and vote for better social safety nets (welfare), more hospitals, workers rights. This type of sh1t.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 01:41 AM
2

Thanks for sharing !
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 01:13 AM
2

Very insightful ! Thanks, last paragraph especially ! As far as I'm concerned, they're in the same fucking team. We are just fodder for these groups. Indeed, they both see us either as "Something(not someone) to extract Resources from" or some "play-doh to be molded how I see fit"...not considering as full human beings worthy of support or even curiosity/interest. It's crazy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 01:08 AM
2

🤣🤣🤣 That masculine logic just never fails, indeed ! I love it. I guess that would be the last resort. Always been leftwing for I always seen how lucky I am through the sheer randomness of my birth and wish for everybody in society to be that lucky and supported at least. So always been rooting for cooperation and collective support...but in a society of free-for-all, I like my chances too !🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️ But I might be a bit too much on the naive acoustic side of things to navigate rightwing constant …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 01:03 AM
2

Oh yes INDEED !! Thank you very much !
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 12:03 AM
2

why do you only socialize with people who are ideologically committed to hating you? Why do you subscribe to a form of politics that makes you feel like shit? I understand the point you making but it's not that simple. The politics dont make me feel like shit and I actively avoid id0t and hostile people. But what used to be a subset of my political side as become hegemonic already...but still hiding its face (meaning the people doing this toxic sh1t don't announce themselves...making it harder t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 12:01 AM
3

It's a constant popularity contest, not a great battle of ideas. That part ! So exhausting and aggravating...but also a complete waste of space and activist energy that could otherwise be very transformative (even if only for the people involved, their family or local community) Funny, I thought I was okay with having given up, but writing this I find myself a bit sad. Damn, I feel you, broski ❤😌😌 Don't you find some solace online, being able to 'talk honestly' about about politics ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 02:28 PM
2

Indeed. I guess I should look out in my local area for these community too, thanks ! Society doesn't seem to know what to do with men who do that That society is unprepared for it is to be expected. But isn't it weird that the very people asking demanding these changes are at loss/uninterested as to what to do with the results and people that undergo/incarnate these changes ??
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 02:20 PM
3

Damn, very insightful insight, thanks !
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 08:41 AM
10

The redpill is unhinged but one "quote" I kept from them is to learn, as a man, to let miserable women be miserable on their own. Trying to content or make sense of some people is simply vain. It's just annoying that hegemonic feminism and platform algorithms put these profiles upfront meanwhile the ones with actual autonomous thinking and analytical skills are confined to small audiences.🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 08:29 AM
2

It's actually none of what I talk about irl. But it do is a big chunk of my interest...hence the dephasing and feeling of alienation that my relationships are not that genuine/deep. Is it so hard to fathom, really ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 08:24 AM
3

Hi, yes. On three different occasion with 3 different practitionner. Everything they say about pro-feminine bias in therapy and psychotherappy "industry" is true and then some. They were all 'knives-out' feminists (the one with the combative talking points always ready on the back burner, constantly decentering you from your own fukkeen session), no connection or empathy whatsoever. And blatantly ignorant about the male experience. While offering me advices that only work on them and their demog…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 08:16 AM
2

I hope for a world without that kind of segregation, but it would involve more effort from women to engage with men Yet another taboo of modern wokism: admitting women do indeed have privileges under patriarchy. Especially the one of romantic passivity and selectivity. They will never acknowledge that. Even if it's such an obvious component of each of our individual's life. Even tho the current statu quo of active men/passive women is BOUND to generate female sexual casualties (even if just by s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 08:07 AM
1

It doesn't help that women's taste in men doesn't seem to have changed. It's still the traditional The biggest taboo of this community and kinda proof of their average hypocrisy/double-face. In my most involved activist years, the pattern was IMPOSSIBLE to not nothing. Not even redpilling. Just bitter-pilling. The feminist outspoken poetry major that somehow always coincidentally hitch with the mildly belittling engineer 5year older dude...like: bruh. And it's not even an issue as you didn't joi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 08:00 AM
2

I wanted to think it was just some tumblr radfem terf stuff that would hopefully die out, but in a lot of ways it has become standard. Sadly. but the tumblr radfem approach is too enticing Yes, and the community is plagued with mediocrity right now. So they are not able to escape the complacency. Im not even sure they care. I partly blame this downward mediocrity on the platforms/social media UI and features. As activism moved from Facebook and Reddit to tumblr, then Instagram then TikTok...ever…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 07:47 AM
9

Damn, bro. That last bit is was so unhinged. The ability of these people to absolutely DROP every ✨humanist & empathetic❤ value in an HEARTBEAT whenever it's about/toward men should really be studied. It creates double-faced individual you absolutely can't trust and that will betray you at your lowest/most vulnerable point. Insane. Sorry you had to deal with that, especially from a guest of a guest...in your own fukkeen house.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 04:57 PM
3

Damn, you're straight up PREACHING, my man ! 🥳 I also flatly reject any moralizing of people. I make think what a person does is harmful or that someone's ideas are stupid but I do not accept that a person is harmful or stupid. It is sort of a nuance Nice practical advice. Now you do mention, I also realize this subtle trait is something really worth assessing in people you met. Are they able to judge ONE action/situation as itself or do they constantly define every instant of the whole person t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 04:49 PM
6

"Sometimes it seems like the only time males are addressed specifically is for completely negative reasons." It seems like it because it is so. "In all the sweeping condemnations of men and males, are trans women included as well?" Yes. And trans men too. Sadly. Which is double egregious. Personally, it was the testimony of fully transitioned trans men that partly woke me up from my woke-hypnosis. They were flat out saying that social life as a perceived-men IS. NOT. FUN. Uncomparable to the war…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 02:54 PM
6

"It's going back to a sex-essentialist approach." THAT PART. Sh1t ultimately be regressive af but these mediocre imbec1les can't seem to realize it. Or they simply don't care.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 02:36 PM
4

Yeah that too. Altough I wouldn't even mind the misandry and st00peed gender-war if you were allowed to make the same level of generalization about w0men. What I find abject, especially for pseudo-leftist spaces is the obvious double standard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 02:31 PM
11

The problem is two-fold: Leftism isn't all about wokeness and woke isn't the only way to be leftwing. Woke people came to us because we defend safety nets for society and that all humans deserve equal rights. But ultimately, they want to hoard resources and special rights. All these progressivism, because they have and trendy and edgy side, detract resources and attention from traditional fights like homelessness and healthcare. Like focusing federal funds on making sure little girls run 30yards…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 02:29 PM
11

Shit be crazy online indeed. But I do talk about IRL spaces too. Like everybody claim to be an egalitarian or feminist until you somehow hint at having women clean the town gutter too. 🤷‍♂️ Or in the next war conscription. Or equal jail sentence for equal crimes. Or longer paternity leave for men. Or any reproductive rights for men, for that matter. Or that prison rape is not okay either. Then they immediately turn into woke_bot.exe spewing the latest twitter quip and you're the incel suspect. O…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 02:18 PM
23

"but men often have increased barriers to socializing, people just don't want men around the same way they want women around." THAT PART. Having to explain to my lifelong partner that, unlike her (for I litterally seen it happen for her over and over in our different stages of life)...just standing in a room (whatever the activity in that room) and smiling making eye-contact with strangers (men or women) is NOT ENOUGH for them to try to interact with me, ask about me, tell about themselves...and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 01:56 PM
3

Damn, I wish I had a relevant answer to comment here but your comment is already very complete. Thanks for the guidance. I personally identify as an unretraded-leftwing and post-woke person. "unretraded-leftist" meaning, economically and fiscally I'm as left as they come but I also seen firsthand the amount of waste, ineffectiveness, low-productivity and corruption that plague public spendings and tax dollars (not talking about federal USA but other countries that are sane)...so before any socia…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 01:48 PM
7

Been on step one for a bunch of years, now, tho :/ That's my issue. Thing is, relating to both your step 2 and 4. Politics do are a big interest of mine. Not the callout and antagonistic "debate" part of it. Too old for this sterile shit, now. The understanding, researching and building new-through-the-old part. I also find it really interesting and a way to connect deeply to other people deep values and priorities when exchanging PoV about specific topics and good faith. To such an extent that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 01:29 PM
5

Damn, that's crazy. I hope you found some safe crowd and support <3 I'm not even "leftist" by the definitions of many here Just for precision sake, what is "Civic libertarian land" ? Also, I'm not USA-centric (let's say my background is European). So to me, in my reference-system there is no significant effective Left in the US/North America, the Dems are moderate neolibs at best. Did you mean you're left of the Dems or you meant something else ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 01:14 PM
7

"And if you ever talk to a therapist, vet them. I’ve met some of the most misandrist, judgmental people in that profession. Don’t assume they’ll be ethical, compassionate, or even competent. Politics infects everything. Read the APA guidelines for men and boys — it’ll give you a sense of what you might be walking into. Don’t trust too quickly. Ask questions. Scrutinize. Protect yourself first. Make yourself a priority." Damn, we twin, bro. ❤👥 We went Couple Counseling for a rough patch and anoth…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 01:06 PM
5

"That means being sensitive to how people make me feel. If someone consistently makes me feel unseen, diminished, or anxious — I trust my gut and pull back." Yeah, I realized that part big time in the recent years. I fell into the W0ke rabbit hole pretty early, so I realized its limitation and the sterile toxicity of its community pretty early and got "out" pretty early too, compared to my peers/age class and such. Then watching them get into it one by one and staying stuck in the pedantic-virtu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 12:56 PM
6

"What if you want to build genuine relationship with people and question society with them ?" Was obviously referring to plural form, meaning friendshipS, social groups, etc. Meeting people and ultimately making friends out of some of them. Or at least people you can have proper conversations with. What then ? I'm good on the intimate romantic relationship part. But even then, the scope of my post and worries go well beyond first date lvl of discussions and topics. At some point, you do get to t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 12:44 PM
6

What if you want to build genuine relationship with people and question society with them ?? How do you get to know their values ? I completely understand some political topics are more sensitive than other and basically, for these, you'll only ever know your spouse's opinion on them for certain. But I find that the hegemonic progressist side tend to constantly enlarge the area and list of 'Do not challenge this or be labeled!' topics to toxic levels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 07:13 AM
10

Damn, you're narrating my life rn. Fvck. How do you get out of this soul-sucking phase, tho ??
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 06:39 AM
5

This. Completely and entirely this. And it's everywhere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 03:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter