TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Leprecon Archive

View 4 posts and 465 comments by Leprecon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm not sure if he realises, but it isn't exactly a point working in his favor that he has multiple exes he can't let go of and is still writing trying to get back with years after. (assuming this is indeed a different person) I think that's just a recurring theme in his life, things happening for no reason at all. Like how he quickly deleted every post and comment you linked to. As he explained, that was all unrelated, so they must've gotten deleted for no reason at all! Oh my god yes. His ex d…
/r/MensRights20/02/21 08:46 AM
0

Of course. Wouldn’t want to ruin your pitty jerk with some nuance. Please carry on with your story about how a random girl for no reason at all decided to report you for harassment to the university.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 02:36 PM
-1

Just out of curiosity, was this the same girl that you had a complete mental breakdown over because she went out for drinks with friends? You know, the one that you became suicidal over and blamed her for it because she did a completely normal thing that women do? You know, the one that dumped you and then you put your relationship 'on hold' (after she dumped you), and then you tried to get her back for a long time, and even wrote her a long letter trying to win her back 8 months later because y…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 01:58 PM
1

It isn’t like any are official holidays or something. They are just days that people choose to observe. If you don’t like it just don’t celebrate it.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/20 11:52 AM
7

I think you might be on the wrong subreddit if you don’t want to see sexist stuff...
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/20 11:49 AM
3

Well part of the problem was that he stole the flag and then burnt it close to a building. a judge sentenced him to the maximum of 15 years in prison on the arson charge, one year in jail on the reckless use of explosives charge, and 30 days for harassment. Basically he got 30 days for the harassment, 15 years for arson.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen30/12/19 11:57 PM
0

Just FYI, what you are describing is called "toxic masculinity" and it is a really basic concept of feminist ideology. The idea is basically that men constantly compete in unhealthy ways, and constantly put each other down as a way of socialising. So if you say "I love cheesecake", which is a totally normal statement, other men can sort of show off how 'manly' they are by criticising you. Positive masculinity would be that they respect what you say and perhaps not care about it because why the f…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 12:28 PM
22

you have anything other than Gillette shaving products in there, the mental association made is that you support rape You are so detached from reality.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 12:12 PM
-1

You didn't read the article.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 12:04 PM
3

The article literally says that...
/r/MensRights26/09/18 12:03 PM
-1

Also, she has a fucking baby. Say and think what you want about men and women, but I think we can all agree that babies need more help than anyone, man or woman.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 05:05 PM
7

Did any of the men press charges?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 02:06 PM
-4

please correct me if I am wrong The part where you go wrong is where you pretend that femen is taken seriously by anyone.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 11:04 PM
3

Here is how you control a government without needing to result to Democracy (voting). You don't like a government, take arms storm the buildings of leadership, surround them. Capture all of the leaders either kill them or take them hostage. Cut off food to the population, blame the government. The population starves, and rises against the government. You have a bolstered army. Overthrow it and install a new leader in power....he will be controlled by fear of military action. It will be mandatory…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 12:04 PM
-10

Female genital mutilation encompasses any alteration of the female genitals. This can be a minor snip of the labia to the complete removal of the clitoris and lips and sewing shut of the vagina save a pee hole. Male circumcision basically is at its worst removal of the foreskin perhaps leading to erectile dysfunction later and weirdly placed skin/hair. If it would be comparable to the female counterpart then male circumcision would range from cutting off the penis and balls to snipping of a smal…
/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:35 AM
-1

I say it should be a violation of the rules to "redditbomb" any subreddit You should be careful what you wish for. Some people say this subreddit "invades" others by sometimes crossposting to other subreddits.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:39 AM
-6

You obviously can tell the people who want equality from the people who want dominance. You are the mod of this subreddit with the power to silence those who are hurting the cause. Why haven't you?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 10:12 AM
1

That subreddits banlist must be bigger than its list of subscribers :D
/r/MensRights26/02/12 04:27 PM
1

He is also a regular poster there. He is the creator of that subreddit, and basically its only poster. What I like is how he complains that women get default custody and instead argues; Political Objectives: Fathers get default custody of children In the sidebar of his subreddit. If that isn't a double standard then I don't know what is. Edit: forgot to mention you might find yourself banned from that subreddit for criticising it in a different subreddit. I know I was.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 01:33 PM
1

Easy for you to say when it isn't your piece of paper.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 05:19 PM
1

I am saying that he can have enough time furthering a cause once he no longer faces threat of expulsion.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 12:01 PM
2

Don't. It isn't worth the risk and it could lead to some serious consequences with regards to your education.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 08:17 PM
0

Lets pretend that what you say is true (which I highly doubt) and there are many PUAs who call it a social skill and use it to get the one girl they are in love with. How does this relate to mens rights? You have every right to be as socially 'skilled' as you want. There is no legal framework impeding you from doing so. There is a social bias against PUAs, but what do you expect? The core demographic consists of guys who want to bang chicks. Similarly, men in relationships can benefit from Game …
/r/MensRights17/01/12 09:06 PM
-3

We need to stop seeing Game and Men's Rights as two separate things. They're two specific elements of the larger overall Men's Movement. They really aren't. One is a hobby revolving around using women sexually, the other is a reactionary movement in response to feminisms lack of attention towards issues revolving around male health, protection, legislation, and rights in general. All I can think of is a married father who is asking the question "should I get my son circumcised" versus a guy at a…
/r/MensRights17/01/12 08:41 PM
4

4Chan is not a source for anything. If you take anything from 4chan serious you are stupid. There are many people who like to troll and many who like to tell sob stories just to get attention. This is not a problem that is foreign to reddit either. Beta, Alpha. These are meaningless terms. People should live how they want and not feel confined to certain roles. If we truly want equality then we should accept that people want to live their own life their own way, whether or not you consider them …
/r/MensRights17/01/12 08:21 PM
13

Isn't a life threatening situation a test of societal rules and moral rules? If you conduct yourself similarly in a threatening situation it not only shows your integrity, but proves the rigidity of your belief system. If you change your ways in such a situation it show hypocrisy and opportunism. Lets say a female feminist is on a sinking ship. The captain says "women and children first", and she does as she is told and boards the lifeboat before the men. This person would no longer have any foo…
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:12 PM
4

Can you really blame her? She thinks there were two guys that attacked her that sort of looked like the two guys she sees in court. She is traumatised and wants her attackers to go to jail. She didn't go to court thinking "I'm gonna send two innocent men to jail!". There really was no malice involved. Neither parties knew each other, and according to her, those were the assailants. The thing that went wrong here is over reliance on a traumatised persons eye witness testimony. Something I find in…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 03:22 PM
5

And at the same time an accusation from a poor immigrant worker destroyed a political carreer of one of the most politically influental people in France despite not having been proven in court. When a random person has so much power I don't think you can look at that case and say that it was a failure for the people who say rape shouldn't be taken lightly. It was taken very seriously. Also, when you start giving out interviews and become a public figure, I think you lose the right to say "but th…
/r/MensRights14/01/12 09:42 AM
11

I wonder how srs would explain this. My best guess would be "This just shows how sexist everybody is by helping the woman, because they think women need help in general because they are weaker." Also, here is a similar video but instead of someone ripping of a blind man and a blind woman it is a woman abusing a man and a man abusing a woman in public. Feminists can reason all they want, but you can't explain away reality.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 08:11 PM
3

Is it really that surprising though? People come here all the time and say "Never realized such hatred existed on reddit". It is only inevitable that there will be views you consider hateful. I for one might consider mormons hateful and they might consider atheists hateful. Then there are politics subreddits which I won't even bother to discuss. Hate is everywhere, just try not to let it get to you!
/r/MensRights04/01/12 03:04 PM
2

Because "go get me a sandwich" jokes are rarely between two people in a mutually respectful and loving relationship. When my gf tells me to fix her phone or fix her computer I will. If I ask her if she can cook while I am doing that she will too. It's called division of labor and it doesn't have to be the guy that does the technical stuff and the woman who does the household stuff. Anything to do with cars is automatically her domain for instance.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 11:14 AM
1

Unfortunately we have a lot of trolls here that will go out of their way to blame women regardless. This is mainly due to our very relaxed stance on banning trolls because many would, and do, consider us trolls and ban us. If it makes you feel any better, I downvoted this topic. Sorry for the bother, and good luck.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 10:55 AM
4

I understand that, but he failed to reflect that in the topic title and it seems as if he has a problem with this woman deciding for herself what she wants to do with her body.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 10:50 AM
1

Yes, that means refusing service to blacks is OK. Legally ok, not morally ok.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 10:38 AM
2

I think it is sexist, I just don't care. If a business wants to treat its customers that way then why not? I won't be going to any ladies nights and I will think less of businesses that host them. The only people you are likely to meet there are the kind that don't mind scavenging for free drinks. Those aren't the people I am interested in meeting and if I would want to meet those people then I would go to one of those businesses. I am somewhat libertarian so I don't care. Neither would I deny a…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 10:37 AM
3

It's okay to want equality for men, even if women do have it tougher (debatable I suppose, I'm new to this whole men's rights thing). It's all right to fight for what effects you and those you know personally. And that is this subreddit summarized in 3 sentences. Welcome!
/r/MensRights30/12/11 10:19 AM
1

I like how you reduced your previous "many" to "some". Yes, some men are shallow and marry accordingly. But to imply those are anything but a minority is unfair and a generalisation.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 07:27 PM
2

Obviously it's satire the truth is that there are many women who want to be trophy wives. I have seen faster contradictions but this one is especially noteworthy for this little addition here; This sub just enjoys demonizing women. many men demand them. In the previous sentence you say that we demonize women and then you follow that up by making a huge generalisation about men alleging that we appreciate women only for how the look, in effect demonising men.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 05:23 PM
4

Be a Trophy Wife was or will be a featured article on 2011-12-28. If you see a way this article can be made even better, please feel free to edit it. . Featured Articles (FAs) showcase wikiHow's very best work. Though I want to believe that this is a poor attempt at humor, I have yet to see any evidence pointing to the fact that it is.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 05:14 PM
1

What else do you suggest in the place then? Should men force women to become pregnant and have a child? Yes, there is a disparity in amount of options each gender has after conception. Said disparity is caused by biological differences and any alteration to it would be inhumane and psychotic. All we can change are the human constructs surrounding having children, but we cannot demand that any one gender make up for their biological characteristics. Women have uteri. Not only is it something they…
/r/MensRights29/12/11 04:44 PM
1

Some of them are reiterations of previously made points, but it is a good list overall. Hopefull it will make women out there think "oh yeah, I have that, and men don't."
/r/MensRights27/12/11 10:11 AM
7

You run /r/shitredditsays... How many topics would be in that subreddit if you said "but that was just a joke" would be a valid excuse for discrimination?
/r/MensRights27/12/11 01:00 AM
10

Haven't you heard? Them being bigots doesn't count because their world view is the right one. It's not like every bigot ever has used this explanation to justify their bigotry.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:38 PM
15

The situation itself? The fact that he tried opening up to someone and at his most vulnerable he was physically abused?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 07:22 PM
2

All I want for Christmas is sexist because it permeates the myth that women want men... The lyrics never mention a man. The "you" could refer to anybody as I am sure it does for many people. If anything this song says that nobody wants to be alone. It is simply untrue that this is about women needing men because not a single gender is specified. The song applies to any gender combination possible. I saw mommy kissing santa clause? She doesn't even say what is wrong about it. She just says "bleh"…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:34 PM
25

Fortunately this is fake.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 10:12 AM
1

Reddit, what are his legal options? I hate to be so boring as to not offer any advice, but why are you asking reddit for legal advice?! Legal options -> Lawyer Laws change from country to country from state to state. Laws change from year to year. There is a reason why there is a profession made out of knowing the law and helping people with understanding their legal options.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 12:24 PM
3

What annoys me is that certain people read what we stand for and still think we are a group of men trying to hang on to our privilege. I'm glad you aren't one of those people.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 12:11 PM
4

Guard on inmate. Unless you are saying that the majority of guards are gay then male guards in male prisons and female guards in female prisons would prevent sexual exploitation by guards/prisoners.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 12:08 PM
-1

It is actually not recognized as a sport to avoid safety regulations. Cheerleading is dangerous and for any dangerous sport you have to wear protection.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 09:12 AM
3

Those definitions aren't decided by google. Google is a search engine. They search the web and get you back a definition of what they found. So yes, maybe a combination of wikipedia, dictionary.com and other sources have different definitions of rape, of which one was chosen as the best by an algorithm which decided to show a definition that is sexist. You can't expect an algorithm to understand gender politics.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 10:30 AM
9

And you explained it in a way that you believe makes sense. ignatiusloyola only does the very same. The difference is that when ignatiusloyola does, you disagree and then all of a sudden ignatiusloyola is a threat to the movement. But when you do it it is ok I guess...
/r/MensRights08/12/11 11:39 AM
12

There is no excuse for such attacks in a rational discussion. Then why do you call ignatiusloyola a manipulative jerk? That IS an attack. If he had just explained why "correlation is not causation" and how it is relevant, if it is, it would have NOT been an attack: it would have been a rational argument. You do know that you can have a rational argument and use it to come to an insulting conclusion, right? You do it yourself. You gather evidence, weigh options and conclude ignatiusloyola is a ma…
/r/MensRights08/12/11 11:34 AM
33

No. You are highly selective in what you choose as a quote. Many of these things aren't attacks at all, they are disagreements. Many of those phrases are taken from very big long concise posts. Take for instance this one; So go ahead - keep making your claims, and keep challenging us "leftist MRAs", because you merely out yourself as amoral, and unethical. That was in response to someone saying Anyone with a brain can recognize that equal rights don't and can't exist. Anyone with a brain? zomg p…
/r/MensRights08/12/11 11:17 AM
9

“The victims have not recanted, no one has confessed, and there is no direct evidence that Haynesworth did not commit these crimes,” Judges Larry G. Elder and William G. Petty wrote in a dissenting opinion. Fuck everything about this. There is no evidence that he did either. The only witnesses whose claims were verifiable were the ones who turned out to be wrong.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 10:48 AM
6

Case tossed against Rayon McIntosh despite brutal cellphone video that shows Greenwich Village behind-the-counter brawl Despite? The footage clearly showed they were being aggressive and started to attack him. The footage wasn't in any way incriminating. The only reason they arrested him is because he could defend himself properly.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 10:30 AM
2

Just because they have penises doesn't mean they don't support equal rights for women. Feminism has widespread support in government. We live in a democracy. If you don't like it then vote. 50% of the electorate is female. A lot of women vote based on who they think is right, not on who has the least body parts in their pants. Also, my country has 38% women in its parliament. Still a bit low but far from a boys club.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 09:06 AM
5

I don't think you could find anyone here that doesn't support equal rights for women. I do think you will find a lot of people here that think the phrase "equal rights for women" is superfluous and should be something like "equal rights, regardless of gender" I feel that feminism seems to ignore, or purposefully tolerate instances of injustice towards men, either as being irrelevant to general gender equality or as a rightful retribution for past grievances. I'm not going to deny that there are …
/r/MensRights28/11/11 06:12 PM
5

Why is this my responsibility? It isn't a womans responsibility to cook for me and to clean my house, it isn't my responsibility to bring out my club and try and defend "my" women. If you want equality then you need to accept that it will not always work out in your favour. Maybe society expects men to throw themselves in dangerous situations just because a victim is a woman, but no thanks. I will decide based on individual merit who I help and who I don't endanger my life for. I will call the p…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 12:56 PM
-1

Just FYI, I had downvoted the original story before even reading it. The title was sensationalist and the content obviously anecdotal. There are assholes in both genders. We all know that. What we ought to be showing is that assholes of the female gender get too much support from the state for being a woman. This can be achieved by linking relevant news articles or stories about female assholes who get help due to crappy legislation or poor sexist judgement on behalf of law enforcement/legal sys…
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:51 AM
2

Sexism isn't a zero sum game where there is one winner and one loser. You need to evaluate prejudice with regards to each individual facet of society. Yes, I wont get harassed for my looks when I walk down the street. Yes, I wont get touched inappropriately whilst wading through a large crowd of people at a party. People wont question my skill when I say I am in IT. I will however get judged more harshly if I get arrested. I will get funny looks if my girlfriend has a black eye. Nobody would loo…
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:50 AM
3

What I hate is that this isn't a criticism against men, but a criticism against boys. Baby boys. Yes, baby boys are the ones responsible for rape and suggesting they should be implanted with technology we wouldn't even consider for criminals is a hilarious joke. It is no longer men as a gender who are responsible for all rape, nope, it is baby boys too. As soon as the child is born it is already guilty of being a threat to women.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:36 AM
1

So you are saying that because I am offended your original accusation was correct. What world do you live in? When you call people assholes, do they smile at you and say "have a nice day"? Newsflash; people get offended when you are mean to them, regardless of whether or not your accusations are correct. This has to be the most immature behavior I have ever seen that tries to pass off as an intellectual retort. On the same level as shouting out "hey dickface" to someone and then when they respon…
/r/MensRights24/11/11 10:02 PM
1

Thanks asshole. It's not like men in IT or something could be well adjusted people. Nope, all of them are creeps. Who needs to evaluate real people with feelings based on their individual character when you can just stereotype a lot of people in offensive ways? Apparently you don't.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 09:08 PM
5

"The courts have been very careful not to in any way be seen to be complementing, congratulating or condoning the actions and attitudes of each of the parents, and this isn't a case where one should see that the mother has been vindicated in her actions. A yes, the parent totally cares about the cliffnotes of the trial which say that the judge doesn't approve. I'm sure mom will think in 10 years "Damn judge, not complementing, congratulating or condoning my actions" Not vindicated? I guess getti…
/r/MensRights24/11/11 08:34 PM
2

how's it necessary as long as I'm clear about it not being possible for me to change my mind about it? I assume you know the common prejudice against people who want vasectomies young; "He will probably change his mind later" This is what some people will think if you say you don't want kids. When you say "100% sure I don't want kids", others hear "50/50 chance I will change my mind in a year or two"
/r/MensRights21/11/11 11:20 PM
1

Even though I completely disagree, I get how radicals might consider small boobs "objectification". But tough? Tough is a character aspect. Am I no longer allowed to like other women based on their characteristics?
/r/MensRights13/11/11 09:36 AM
21

Curiously enough, almost everybody there has a similar story. What I like is how they all know the phenomenon yet only very few are able to say that it is sexism.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 05:32 PM
7

I always find the genderbread person helps me a bit with terminology (though it isn't applicable to what you are asking)
/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:50 PM
5

What I hate is that they drag skin color into this. That we are men is relevant. This is /r/mensrights after al. That we are (primarily) straight means we will face different challenges than gay men. That we are white ....? Skin color has nothing to do with this subreddit. They want us to be the enemy they see in us. Unfortunately for them I have never been and never will be a racist.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 03:46 PM
2

I'm not quite familiar with the term. What does neckbeard mean? (besides the obvious) Is it supposed to be a reference to poor hygiene of men?
/r/MensRights06/11/11 03:33 PM
8

Political Objectives: Fathers get default custody of children No thanks, that isn't a subreddit I think is rational. I wouldn't go there for the same reason I wouldn't listen to a woman who says that because men rape children custody should always go to women. Don't judge a gender by what people with the same gender have done, judge individuals. Women aren't the enemy, sexists are. Edit: from ss_camaro sent 8 hours ago you have been banned from posting to smashing feminist dogma and their co-con…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 05:20 PM
61

Original article, written by the perpetrator. Please read the original one since at least that one is honest. Liz recognizes it was wrong to do and she writes it as a cautionary tale for other men. She even uses statistics to back up that this is common, unlike what the writer of the above article is willing to admit. A 2001 survey revealed that 42 per cent of women would lie about using contraception in order to get pregnant in spite of their partners’ wishes. Among my circle, many girlfriends …
/r/MensRights05/11/11 03:34 PM
4

I just think that as a subreddit we don't do enough to keep the obvious misogynists out. /r/againstmensrights always has a list of bad comments, but this list is always filled with comments that are heavily downvoted.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 06:53 PM
1

What struck me as odd was how she said that men felt afraid to go against the trend of this crappy media which sexualises, objectifies, etc. I am not afraid to speak out against it, I feel I don't have to. I am not to blame for what misogynists do to women just because I am a man.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 04:12 PM
2

It actually also covers how the media approaches men and boys and what kind of effect the media has on men.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 04:08 PM
1

Ironically, when women claim abuse and kill their husband, they get not guilty verdicts.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:38 PM
7

I always found it in poor taste that manboobz, someone who disagrees with us, is banned for something he said said on his own website. Whereas trolls who are here solely to troll and not contribute in any way are allowed to stay. Why would trolls be allowed to stay? Normally the question about whether or not you should ban someone is the question of whether or not that person is trolling or is actually being serious. manboobz_ is most definitely not serious and demonstrably only here to troll. m…
/r/MensRights30/10/11 04:06 PM
4

Unnecessary non consensual surgery on babies. Done to adhere to a beauty standard perpetuated by the practice itself. (if everybody coloured their hair green, then the occasional blonde would look like a freak) Can cause complications, mostly not direct complications that have an effect on the baby, but complications that only show up once puberty kicks in. Foreskins are sold for medical purposes giving hospitals financial gain for each foreskin they take. (they get used in skin grafts or someth…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:10 PM
5

feminism is very generational. This has always interested me. Obviously a movement like feminism can only exist if there is inequality and some times have more inequality than others. I am 22 years old. I by no means wish to diminish the impact of sexism on women, but in my world I grew up always seeing women as peers and I have mostly been sheltered from any real sexism. What I like to see myself as (and you are free to disagree) is someone who sees social inequality in both ways (both against …
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:05 AM
1

Ignoring the obvious stereotyping that the website does by making both sites dreamgirlfriend and dreamboyfriend wind up with the man being the abuser; I did look at their website and despite all the videos being man on woman abuse. The advice and resources they have there cater to both genders. Their comments section does have male moderators telling boys the resources for those that are being abused and their faq lists those resources at every turn. Their faq also has many mentions of how men c…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 09:40 AM
8

What the fuck. I was clicking around and then saw "hey, there is a counterpart to this website for women as well. If anything this makes it less sexist. Now off to /r/mr to tell them they are overreacting" Then I tried to see what the "dream boyfriend" would do after 3 commands. Fucking hell...
/r/MensRights23/10/11 09:24 AM
1

But in that scenario you don't assume consent, you establish it through both of your actions. This is something which is necessary. Lets say I go into a dark room where a couple is sleeping. I push away/tie up/drug the guy an then I lie next to her and start grinding her. She gets the hint and then there is sex. Then, after sex, I stand up, turn on the light, and show her who I am and she is shocked that I am not her partner. In the above scenario, what I did would have been consensual because s…
/r/MensRights22/10/11 07:06 AM
1

But lack of no does not mean yes. I am sure there are many things you haven't said no to, but don't want to happen to you at the same time. With anything else in life you have to consent before something happens. You don't get an automatic pizza delivery to your house every night that you have to call off for them not to deliver. You get a pizza if you call them to deliver it. If a question hasn't been asked, the default answer is always no. Assuming yes as default is dangerous and also happens …
/r/MensRights21/10/11 03:48 PM
1

1) She is not exercising her right to declare non-consent (i.e. she is consenting). You are saying consent is implied and non consent needs to be declared. I would go in a different direction and say that non consent is the default and that consent is necessary. A lack of non consent does not equal consent.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 02:39 PM
1

My attempt: The purposeful continuation or instigation of any sex act without consent of one person or after non consent has been established in a clear manner. "Without consent of one person" mean that to instigate sex you specifically need consent and non consent is the default state (obviously) "The purposeful continuation" Because it can be rape even if you started out willing. "after non consent has been established" because when someone you are having sex with objects and you continue purp…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 02:37 PM
3

"Even though they (the women) ... obviously must take full responsibility for their actions, nothing else can be said than that he has abused their weak psychological state and longing for human contact. This has been systematical," the court said. These things are always condescending towards women. Poor women are preyed on and can't help themselves. Men are responsible and women aren't. Women are always treated as weaker. How can feminists not see this as blatant sexism that is harmful to men,…
/r/MensRights18/10/11 08:06 PM
2

The irony of this is that it is supposed to protect women from being harassed. Good job, in that area women are no longer harassed. Men however? Beaten on sight.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 08:01 PM
2

My point exactly. To me it would make sense that if you got raped you don't have to pay child support. Apparently the legal system disagrees.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:19 AM
2

Man has sex with woman Man says "get off of me" Woman continues against his will ??? Man is rapist I don't get your logic.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:15 AM
23

Lawyer. Lawyer lawyer lawyer! I would like to say press rape charges, but I don't know whether a successful conviction of rape (if it possibly even reaches that point) would actually get you off the hook. There have been people who got raped who have had to pay child support in the past. I would like to tell you to get a recording of her saying she wouldn't get off you when you said you wanted her to. But I don't know whether your state requires her consent to tape her. (something which could in…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:00 PM
15

And every girl I've asked has been of the opinion that cut looks better and they prefer cut. Let me guess, you grew up in a country that was mainly circumcised? If so, you are suffering from confirmation bias. If everybody painted their penis purple then the 10% without a purple penis would be the 10% that looks weird and unnatural. If you were to live in any other country you would meet girls who think that uncircumcised penises look better and you would still be here proudly saying that you ar…
/r/MensRights11/10/11 05:44 PM
22

“The moms, in the end, just have the baby circumcised and inform their partner later,” says Rebecca Plank. She has no moral qualms whatsoever about advising surgery against the will of both parents and just saying that the mothers voice is automatically more important than the fathers voice. “If the decision was left only to men, fewer babies would be circumcised,” she says. “I think it’s better if I decide.” Imagine a muslim cleric saying "If the decision was left to the women, fewer baby girls…
/r/MensRights11/10/11 05:37 PM
7

Obviously it was a sarcastic comment.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 04:41 PM
7

True, I forgot that. Which again only illustrates that physical power shouldn't be a factor.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 05:55 PM
11

Things like these make me hopeful. At least some women get it. We may be at the mercy of women who will call us misogynists which successfully makes people ignore us, but at least our side makes so much sense some women can't ignore it either. Recently with the whole lgbt support thing on this subreddit, there was a discussion thread on /r/lgbt about /r/mr. I frequent /r/lgbt loads because I support equal rights for everybody, not just straight white men but everybody. This includes all skin col…
/r/MensRights08/10/11 04:23 PM
4

But every man is always stronger than any woman ever! Right? It couldn't possibly be true that a woman might overpower a man. Feminists agree: “The law treats men and women as being equal when it is obvious that in these matters, the men are the stronger ones.” Either the above holds true or feminists don't want to make a law that applies to everybody.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 03:59 PM
6

“The law treats men and women as being equal when it is obvious that in these matters, the men are the stronger ones.” JUDGE EACH FUCKING CASE INDIVIDUALLY!! A sportsman is charged with rape against a normal woman. Plausible! A female body builder rapes a computer programmer. Plausible! A short woman rapes a tall muscular man? Probably not, though that is for a fucking judge to decide during the trial, not a politician during a meeting that happens 4 years prior to the fact. “What will happen no…
/r/MensRights08/10/11 03:46 PM
7

Interesting article which did make me feel somewhat depressed. Though the dissection of said article is pretty bad. I just felt sorry for her boyfriend. The Mr. Perfect she is looking for? She doesn't deserve him. Just as I wouldn't peruse dating sites to search for better partners while in a relationship, she oughtn't peruse sperm banks whilst in a relationship. Since she knew what she was going to do she shouldn't have kept a person with nothing but best intentions waiting. Maybe if she had be…
/r/MensRights08/10/11 12:08 PM
4

The woman told the Federal Magistrates Court she now remembered having had a one-night encounter with another man. Yeah right. After 10 years she remembers it but after a month she couldn't remember it?
/r/MensRights08/10/11 11:48 AM
2

As for her arguments, they speak for themselves. I agree, which is why I lamented your choice of words. If the article were written by a man and I had said "some dude", would you be on my case about using gendered terms? Probably not, though in my opinion saying "broad" shows more disrespect than "dude". I just think that by calling her "some broad" you are trying to attack the person and not the argument. You could just as easily have mentioned her lacking authority due to her being a president…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 05:31 AM
1

I always say that every couple has its own definition for cheating. Some say porn is cheating. Some say kissing isn't cheating. Some say it is only cheating if you don't use a condom. Some think it is only cheating if they aren't present while it is happening. Cheating is different for everybody, which is why you need to know what your partner thinks is cheating. You need to be very careful when trying to reach a compromise because what is or isn't cheating is all about you and your partners com…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:49 AM
2

some broad I don't see how the gender of the author is relevant when you just as easily could look at her arguments and say what is wrong with them.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:38 AM
10

I wonder how many rapists read that and thought; "You mean I could just choose to stop raping people?! How come I never knew this? I thought I had to rape people and I didn't know that not raping people was an option."
/r/MensRights04/10/11 08:18 PM
2

Relevant article (about Swedish firefighters) source from actual news, not just another blog.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 02:37 PM
3

Though I normally don't like anecdotal evidence on this subreddit, I think this does raise some valid points about the different way in which we judge people for their sexuality. There is this interview with Dan Savage in which he approaches the subject. The core of the article: I realized after getting [straight men] their letters and hanging out with them, it sucks to be a straight guy. They run the world, but that includes, like, running the 7-Eleven. It’s not all glamor. Heterosexual males a…
/r/MensRights01/10/11 05:12 PM
6

Against mensrights logic: Hey look, an /r/MR mod, together with support from many people there is doing something I agree with. This means nothing, and they are doing it to annoy us. . Some guy at the bottom of a thread has made a heavily downvoted comment in /r/MR. This is what the entire subreddit is like. If these people were reasonable I wouldn't have been banned for making reasonable posts there. Though I don't like appealing to authority, I didn't get to have a 4 year old account and a com…
/r/MensRights01/10/11 03:23 PM
10

Tomorrows news: Feminists have asked rapists to respect their choices as women to dress however they want without being negatively affected by it. Though there has been no responses yet from rapists, they are expected to comply and give equal attention to potential victims that aren't as attractive since rapists are always tend to be politically correct people concerned with equality and respecting women's choices.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 03:11 PM
2

Due to rebuilding issues, my university once had a unisex bathroom. No complaints. Its not like being in the same room means you automatically look in each stall or peek over every urinal divider. Bathrooms already cater to your privacy by having stalls and dividers...
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:14 PM
3

Have you got any article or something about this that I could read? I want to find out more.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:32 AM
8

Same thing happened to me. Banned by Squibbling for politely disagreeing. And of course I got completely ignored when I tried talking to her about it. Apparently I am a troll and must be fought.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 09:34 PM
1

Country Belief in a God Belief in a spirit or life force Belief in neither France 34% 27% 33% Hey, you can look up things on wikipedia! If you look at the first 34% that is Christians, Muslims, and Jews. If you look at the 27% that is those who are deists but don't subscribe to any particular religion. (else they would know which religion they subscribe to) The 33% are those who are decidedly non-religious. Christians are still a minority in many countries.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 09:23 AM
5

the idea of banning circumcision is itself politically based. It is surgery. Is it that silly to think of it as a medical idea instead of a political one? This was the first thing that made me doubt the author. To be sure, the KNMG, or Royal Dutch Medical Association, has not called for an outright ban on the procedure; they are far too politically clever for that. Claiming that such a ban would only put the practice into the hands of the unskilled Author: It is political manoeuvring. KNMG: The …
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:24 PM
1

Can I get unbanned from againstmensrights while we are at it?
/r/MensRights19/09/11 10:16 PM
3

Also, moderators from antagonistic subreddits will be receiving their own flair in the coming week, indicating their status. This will include the subreddits: r/feminism, r/feminisms, r/againstmensrights, r/shitredditsays, and r/anarchism. This is not a troll label, just an identifier. Many of the things they say have been valid criticisms for discussion. I don't like this. If they aren't being tagged for trolling then the tag showing which subreddit they are from will only help to detract atten…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 10:01 PM
6

Everybody has freedom of speech. I have the freedom to call every person I meet a dick if I would want to. Problem is, they would think I am a dick and they would be completely right. He has the freedom to tell crude mouse jokes. She has the freedom to tell him to shut up. He has the freedom to continue after she told him to shut up. The university has the freedom to fire him if he doesn't shut up. Freedom of speech applies to everybody, not just yourself. Freedom of speech doesn't mean that oth…
/r/MensRights16/09/11 12:14 PM
8

She came to you instead of going behind your back, like any nice person should. Be thankful and kind to her for that, as she probably just as easily could have done something worse than just talk to you. Tell her that. Tell her that you appreciate her coming to you and that you will try your best to tone it down. She needs to know for future reference that if she is uncomfortable with anything, you are open to discuss it. Tone it down. Yes, maybe you making those kind of jokes is something that …
/r/MensRights16/09/11 12:10 PM
1

Sounds familiar, I have wasted a lot of time writing really long well reasoned and thought out posts only to have them not be approved.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 11:13 AM
10

So lets take this step by step and see where I go wrong. Disagree with how a woman reacts to something I am now emotionally manipulating her by stating that I disagree, even if I truly disagree and am not doing this with any malicious intent. And the act of gaslighting does not simply affect women who are not quite sure of themselves. Even vocal, confident, assertive women are vulnerable to gaslighting. Why? Because women bare the brunt of our neurosis. It is much easier for us to place our emot…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 10:59 PM
1

The post was deleted at some point, probably after being cross-posted. That means the only access to it was through this link, or for people who had already replied. So it's going to be overwhelmingly skewed toward MRAs. I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 06:31 PM
6

That is a legitimate concern that I looked in to. I considered that, and one of those really high voted comments is from someone from this subreddit. That doesn't change the fact that their subreddit is more numerous than ours and they could easily outvote us if they wanted to, which they didn't.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 04:48 PM
47

The top rated comment is. you were VIOLENT towards him, he was right to divorce you. And many others like it. There are just one to three posts that are like what the headline says. Lets not judge them by their worst as we wouldn't want to be judged by our worst. Scroll down this page now and look at the down voted posts in this very thread...
/r/MensRights10/09/11 07:15 AM
3

now you're cherrypicking posts that put MR in a favorable, egalitarian light by referencing a post you yourself made... from way back in march. I would understand if you were to call it cherrypicking if I reference a single post. I however referenced 28 posts. Granted, it is from some time earlier this year, but what do you want? It is /r/mensrights discussing the hardships of women. Not a common sight for obvious reasons. there's a MASSIVE difference between those. yeah, men have problems. they…
/r/MensRights06/09/11 07:29 PM
2

do tell me how hard it is being a straight white male. i'm listening. I did not say that. I said that I chose to adopt an unpopular viewpoint and I accept what that brings with it. I am not going to pretend that I am not privileged because I simply am. This however does not negate any wrongdoing done against men, however minimal they may be if compared to what feminism had/has to take on. perhaps your post isn't the disruptive one, but you are a member of a community that engages in disruptive, …
/r/MensRights06/09/11 05:41 PM
13

pardon us if we don't want your members coming and disrupting our subreddit as you do every other subreddit. You read my post. I was hardly being disruptive. the difference between MRA and feminists is that we, the latter, don't invade your spaces Again, you are here talking to me aren't you? I wouldn't call it invade. If a group of people chooses to purposefully troll then that would be invading. I don't wish to troll. really, are you so intent on having a persecution complex that you'll whine …
/r/MensRights06/09/11 12:20 PM
9

You are here talking to me aren't you? Edit: and I think it is BS too that that guy bans people that haven't even posted there.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 11:50 AM
2

I know I should, I just feel that I should engage and listen to those who I don't agree with as I wouldn't want those who disagree with me to ignore me. If not just out of respect, just out of practicality. You might learn something or show someone else something new.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 07:54 AM
2

The last 5 paragraphs are gold. I hope the boy turned out ok after that, though knowing he was close to the writer I think he most likely will.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 07:09 PM
3

I asked her why she didn't tell me she was on the period, she just said guys ate her out on her period all the time, what is the big deal and "Blood tastes good so why are you complaining" I wonder how she would respond if you accidentally came in her mouth. I doubt "But all the other girls didn't mind would be a plausible defense in court"
/r/MensRights03/09/11 06:44 PM
2

I will be honest, I am one of those men who doesn't like period sex. I don't like the sight of blood on my penis it and I wouldn't feel comfortable with it. Though I realize this is a automated reflex that is not considerate, I also realize it is a reality. Both me and my girlfriend know, having sex with me if I am not in the mood and uncomfortable, simply isn't an enjoyable experience. I wish it wouldn't be that way but it is. I have encountered the kind of thinking from the article in /r/sex m…
/r/MensRights03/09/11 06:41 PM
3

if any one, especially a guy said he could 'forgive' a woman for not wanting to suck cock/have anal or any of the numerous things she might find "icky", I bet her self righteous little face would explode. That is a nice way of putting it that I hadn't considered yet.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 06:23 PM
1

On a personal level, I'm against abortion. However, I'm also against forcing my opinions on others, and especially against legislating morality. Hence, as far as the world is concerned, I'm "pro-choice". It's kind of the whole "I disagree with what you do, but I'll fight for your right to do it" kind of thing. That is very noble of you.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 10:16 AM
3

Ah yes, because children usually never get raped by close family and often get raped by strangers. Oh wait, it is the other way around. OOPS. Someone should tell the judge. Whatever, the judge is just toying with a childs well-being. I think prejudice is more important than children their well-being, right? These sentences sum it all up nicely The primary mandate of family courts is to protect the best interest of the child. So why erect barriers to the functioning of William and Jim’s family in…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 06:24 PM
3

This is a pretty diverse subreddit. We have everything from male trolls who hate women and are mad at their ex, to feminist trolls who make up stuff and act crazy in order to "expose" us. We also have well researched married men and unknowing teenagers. Once you say that the trolls of a subreddit accurately represent a subreddit you show that you ought not to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 09:00 PM
1

If you take into account that in most places rape examinations, and morning after pill for rape victims is free (and should rightly be free) then it only follows that if men have negative consequences from rape they shouldn't have to bear a financial burden either.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 07:33 AM
1

Therefore, the concept that consent to sex automatically equates to consent to parenthood is a fallacy. I didn't say that, because I agree that it doesn't I just think that before sex you should discuss "what if" and if you disagree with what she has in mind then don't have sex. Consent to sex equals acknowledging the risk of pregnancy. If you want to have sex with someone who says she is staunchly against abortion or the morning after pill, that is the risk you are accepting. Don't like it? Don…
/r/MensRights17/08/11 07:29 AM
31

The thing about child support is that this money is paid since two parents who would normally provide for the child together are not sharing the load. When you have a partner and decided to have sex you explicitly accept the risk of pregnancy. When you have a child you accept the responsibility of taking care of it. The reason why you have to pay child support is because you have taken up responsibility of being the parent. Lets say you marry a woman who is pregnant. You both know you didn't imp…
/r/MensRights16/08/11 01:12 PM
1

He who perceived it conceived it!
/r/MensRights15/08/11 03:35 PM
7

After having read the article, I crossed my fingers and scrolled up to see who wrote it, or to be more specific, the gender of who wrote it. If this had been written by a man it either wouldn't have been taken seriously, or that man would have to look for a job. Only women are allowed to criticise feminism...
/r/MensRights12/08/11 01:46 PM
1

The post I linked to clearly says his partner is female and through his other posts he says he is male.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 08:53 PM
2

Haven't you heard? Empowering women and separating them from the rest and treating them differently is now the same thing. I could have sworn they were direct opposites since one is treating a woman as an equal and the other is treating women as inferiors who must be shielded and helped... Ah well, but what do I know.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 10:23 AM
3

The money she got for the interviews wasn't enough probably. (because we all know rape victims love attention, describing their rape in detail, and having the whole world know they got raped)
/r/MensRights09/08/11 04:43 PM
2

Women could always have an abortion, morning after pill, or just the regular birth control pill. There are many ways of stopping a pregnancy, and unfortunately for men most of the possibilities are for women. You can always say that women take a more active role in preventing pregnancies, but this isn't due to women being more responsible and men less responsible. This is due to the fact that men have less options and men have no options after sex. This is part of the problem. If you know childr…
/r/MensRights08/08/11 12:33 AM
0

But you disagreed with a woman. Doesn't that mean you are a woman hater?! How dare you respectfully disagree?!
/r/MensRights07/08/11 11:58 PM
1

I am circumcised, and I am proud to be. Good for you I don't need to clean out my foreskin in the shower, Because you don't have one.. and I have more nerve endings (which means better sex for me) Less actually, how can removing something give you more? because the foreskin protects the penis from thorns and branches when we run around naked, like in the old days. So you argue that your penis is more sensitive because it is protected by your foreskin, the lack of which gives you more nerve endin…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 03:27 PM
7

I'm going to sound like a total pessimist when I say this, but here it goes; I don't believe in true love, I believe in compatibility. (when I say true love I mean the thought that there is just one person out there who is perfect for you and your life should be spent looking for that person. Maybe I am not using the term true love correctly. Maybe I am thinking of soulmates) Certain people are compatible to such an extent that they can live a happy life together. You are compatible with many pe…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 01:33 PM
3

To be honest, this may be a prevalent belief amongst non monogamous couples, but how would you feel if your wife only cheated on you twice?
/r/MensRights22/07/11 01:05 PM
2

Well your response to my post said; There's nothing wrong with the way those guys were talking. Which I completely agree with in my post. I just think there is a difference between doing it in private (bathroom conversation between two people) and in public (behind someones back with an audience of peers and friends of that person) are different. Yes, she can take care of herself. This is why I didn't do anything but make her aware of it. It's not my job to police what other say but why shouldn'…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 12:19 PM
2

I take it that you haven't read my post.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:19 AM
5

Though I disagree with everything in the article, I don't think we should stand idly by when people make sexual comments (when inappropriate) In the articles case it was obviously ok since they were in private at a social gathering where people look for someone to fuck. I have however encountered a person making sexual comments (nothing as mild as the article) about a female friend of mine while at college with around 10 people in the vicinity. (during a ten minute break in between classes) In m…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 11:36 PM
20

The bridesmaids in question, the ones being discussed as though they weren’t real people Yes, just because someone has boobs they are no longer a real person. Let me guess, the writer of the article never referred to anyone as "the guy with the glasses" or "the one with the bald head". Nope, nobody ever makes observations about others referring only to one specific trait of that person. Why should the man be ashamed of being attracted to boobs? If a man is openly sexual he should be ashamed but …
/r/MensRights19/07/11 11:20 PM
2

So much anger and needless hostility. Perhaps angry and unhappy feminists are simply angry and unhappy people using feminism as their catalyst to avoid facing that they are simply an angry, unhappy person. Though I must be honest and say that I lose my cool easily when talking to a sex negative feminist about BDSM. I love my girlfriend, and I like exploring BDSM with her. I can't stand when someone claims that because of the type of sex I occasionally have with her, she is no longer someone whom…
/r/MensRights16/07/11 06:43 PM
7

The fact that feminism is in the list of things that make people embarrassed to accept themselves doesn't bother you?
/r/MensRights16/07/11 02:18 PM
1

This video always struck me as an interesting example of this. She announces without shame that she has sex only with younger men (which is fine) yet after having watched the video in full (which I recommend) I realized that if a man would have said I only have sex with college girls he would be immediately branded a sexist and attacked by any feminist he meets.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 09:21 AM
10

Done painfully straight in the "comedy" Norbit, where Norbit is constantly physically, emotionally, and sexually assaulted by the over-sized "female" lead, due to him being trapped in a relationship with this woman merely because he is too weak willed to stand up for himself. If the genders were reversed, this wouldn't be the least bit funny. *Although the movie wasn't funny even with the genders as they are now. * Made me lol.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 03:05 PM
7

I actually disagree completely. I don't think her concerns were serious at all. If somewhere else something worse is happening it doesn't invalidate the lesser concerns about your current situation, I just think that her concerns are irrelevant. She was asked something which she declined... That is it. I get asked things constantly and I also decline things every once in a while. Why is it offensive to merely ask something?
/r/MensRights08/07/11 07:38 PM
7

A man asked her "Do you want to have sex?" That is what all the fuss is about. A man asked her something to which she said "No" If this is the oppression being fought then I think it is safe to say the fight isn't worth fighting. Yes, it probably is inappropriate and annoying to be propositioned. It is also free speech. There are real problems in the world and guys not being polite enough around 4 am is not one of them. I find this surprising since I distinctly remember Dawkins praising feminism…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 07:26 PM
23

It isn't a point, it is a logical fallacy Just because you have one set of genitals doesn't make your arguments less or more valid. This kind of "reasoning" shouldn't be accepted. Unfortunately I have heard this many times. "You are a guy, you wouldn't get this." Fuck that, explain it to me and see if I do! Claiming gender is detrimental to understanding is what men used to do before and I am pretty sure women didn't like that. Interestingly enough, the two people whom I know that use this argum…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 10:19 AM
2

I completely agree, and it would be perfect if we could apply the concept of a blind audition to job interviews. Unfortunately this is hardly possible. A job interview is handy because you can see how quick the person you are interviewing is on his/her feet.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 09:41 AM
4

There will always be some companies which attract more of one gender over the other. Companies don't have less women just because they hate women. They just want to make profit and that is it. They hire the people who they think are going to be the best for the job. Women take up less jobs. If I have an IT company getting 30% women would be hell and I would literally have to fire competent employees to get more women. Why? The amount of women studying computer science right now is around 10% (in…
/r/MensRights01/07/11 09:31 AM
1

You murderer. How dare you disagree with me.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 08:37 AM
2

Then please do?
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:22 AM
2

Calling people you disagree with rapists is exactly what I wanted to stop when I joined here. When you call someone a rapist you cross a line. Feminists always say there is a male rape culture, because all guys accept rape. Feminists try to throw around the word rape every time they can. You disagree with a feminist? You are now a rapist. Well you know what? I don't want to call people who disagree rapists. There is only one kind of person that you should call rapists, the ones who force sex on …
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:09 AM
2

The right to pray for the extermination of one half of the human species? Calling your opponent genocidal is a heavy accusation. Can you back this up?
/r/MensRights29/06/11 09:33 AM
1

You sound just like a feminist. Don't throw around rape so lightly... She has raped nobody.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 09:30 AM
1

no legal challenges will be made to the new anti-abortion laws because if there was, Roe v. Wade would probably be overturned. Crap. Didn't know it was that bad... Thanks for the informative post.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 07:25 AM
12

Would be nice if feminists had sense enough to stop using those funds and the clout to ruin individual men and start using them to defend women's rights against religious extremism. They also do that, the problem is that everybody expects them to, so when it happens it comes as no surprise to anybody and nobody cares :( There are protests against abortion every day too that are ignored. But yes, a government shouldn't have any say in it, and it sickens me when states pass symbolic anti abortion …
/r/MensRights28/06/11 11:19 AM
2

Reads Dumbass Reads Really? Lol. Reads Robinette, a teacher employed at a charter school WTF?! Really hope she loses her job over this.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 11:00 AM
1

Rape sucks. Rape shouldn't exist. Women should be able to walk around on the streets without having to feel afraid. Men shouldn't harass women for the way they dress. Theft sucks. Theft shouldn't exist. I should be able to leave my house without having to fear getting robbed in the process. NOBODY is arguing rape is amazing fantastic and everybody should do it. EVERYBODY knows rape is bad, EVEN RAPISTS. Yes, it would be fucking amazing if crime didn't happen, but holding marches with poorly defi…
/r/MensRights28/06/11 10:52 AM
11

I am in a long term relationship right now (5 years and counting, WOOT!) What I want is my girlfriend. I think she is a great person and I want to be with her. Concerning pretty much anything else we are equal. I try and do as many chores as her, we pretty much always go dutch on "dates" unless one of us is treating the other. She is on her way to be higher educated than I am and I think it is great that she can unlock her potential this way. (I'm also in a form of higher education, but hers is …
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:43 AM
2

Found this post. Women showing interest in men?! ZOMG, how terrible. It is almost as if instead of golden statues, these women are actual people with emotions that might actually like men. According to this person, women should be put on a pedestal. This person is highly sexist.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 12:59 PM
3

Yes. Though I think the consent is a difference of alcohol level. The girl is completely waisted and you are sober? That's morally questionable. (vica versa this is also true) If both of you are drunk and you two have sex then why isn't it the man who couldn't consent to sex? Its not like the police ever had a blood alcohol test after the sex to determine who was least cognitive hence who got taken advantage of? The bigger question is, do you want to stick your dick in a woman who you've just me…
/r/MensRights19/06/11 10:50 AM
13

I just think it is hilarious that prostitution is illegal unless you film it and distribute it...
/r/MensRights19/06/11 10:35 AM
12

The same rules apply for when we criticize the wage gap. True, but if the agency itself critisises wage gaps that are around the same wage gap they have themselves then they are hypocrites. Nevermind, they have 107 employees, of which around 30 men. It could very easily be a difference in positions. In the company. You can't really blame them for their skewed gap since it is a way too small sample size. Maybe if this place employed a couple of thousands of people the gap would dissipate.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 06:49 PM
10

So what if she doesn't know the answer, she identified the problem and thinks it should be addressed by more people. It is a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 04:04 PM
2

Then why do women put on make-up and nice clothes on days that they don't see their partner? "I just want to look nice" you say? Why do you need to look nice for people who aren't allowed to look at you and appreciate the fact that you look nice? I'm not saying women like being gawked at and that women are attention whores or something. This isn't to be explained by logical thinking, it is how we humans work. I am a man, genetically I am programmed to like good looking women. Provided I do not d…
/r/MensRights14/06/11 02:20 PM
5

I disagree. My first instinct was "It doesn't affect his ability to govern, let it go" as I would only find sex scandals relevant if the person is a hypocrite. (ie an anti-gay republican caught having gay sex. A family values type with 3 mistresses. An abstinence only parent with a child who is an unwed mother. etc..) After reading reddit someone pointed out that this does affect his ability to govern. He was willing to lie for it, which means he could have been blackmailed. All you would need i…
/r/MensRights13/06/11 03:46 PM
3

There is a difference between being angry and advocating violence.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 03:40 PM
4

Don't let human beings see that comment, because it is fucking offensive.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 02:26 PM
52

her actual words were "Hell, bring a camera if you want," which calmed me down a bit Awesome. The fact that she, a woman in labor, comforts a nurse, tells me she will probably be an awesome mother.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 11:19 AM
3

I think they assumed they were just sneakily drinking my drink when I was in the bathroom but if they had asked me it could have been easily cleared up. Ah, I thought they knew you shared the drinks but kicked out the guys nonetheless because it was a sausage fest. Since I was wrong, I retract my previous post. (though I wont delete it since that makes it confusing for others when they are reading the thread and I hate it when people delete their posts)
/r/MensRights11/06/11 07:15 PM
3

Women used to face legal and governmental discrimination and still face social discrimination. That's the problem right there. Because women still face discrimination feminists can't believe that they aren't the eternal victims. Yes women face discrimination. A woman however has the full weight of the legal system backing her up in case of emergency. A man? Well, as I said, a woman has the full weight of the legal system backing her up. Yes, we could decide to only start working at improving con…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 07:11 PM
3

Not only the guys were "at fault", but so were you. This only makes it more obvious that the bar was unfriendly towards men as both parties were guilty of breaking the same stupid rule yet only one party was punished based on gender. At first I was only looking at this as a rant against unfair pricing policy but I completely missed the unfair treatment issue.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 06:13 PM
1

Shaming them is the only way that works. :( Unfortunately this wouldn't be shame. Men have come to accept the double standard against them. That is just the way it works.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 06:00 PM
9

"There's actually a scientific reason for, u should google it," A scientific explanation? For some reason the rest of the modern world doesn't circumcise its babies, and they do just fine. The majority of circumcisions are done out of fear that the child wont fit in. Scientific explanation? Yeah right... Also, the comments are retarded I wonder if Crowe objects to cutting his fingernails and toenails. Or his hair. Or trimming his beard. He objects to “correcting nature” — oblivious to the fact t…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 07:56 AM
2

What I find interesting about that is that everybody knows what he says is true. Men won't come forward about rape as easily as a woman and a man is expected to just walk it off. They know this is true hence the laughter. This isn't something people don't know, this is something people don't care about.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 09:14 AM
3

That was probably the reason why she raped him.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 09:04 AM
1

Now this makes a lot more sense.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 10:01 AM
14

This is an obvious indicator of female privilege. Unfortunately feminists would label this as a display of dominance where the men want to help the weak woman because she can't do it herself.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 07:12 PM
4

No it isn't, it is a misguided equality movement which was built on a sane idea "equality for women" but allowed its motto to turn into "equality, just for women"
/r/MensRights22/05/11 06:25 PM
22

(Chick here- Sorry!) Don't apologize for who you are. You have nothing to do with stupid people somewhere else doing stupid things.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 06:37 PM
6

Well duh. People think that believing equal rights apply to men too is basically the same as telling a woman she can't drive a car and that she should go back to the kitchen. I consider myself a modern man. I like to cook for my girlfriend and we share the workload. She is actually studying at a higher level than me (I can't really be specific as I would have to explain the higher education system in my country) I might out earn her due to my choice of study, or maybe she will out earn me. I don…
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:23 AM
5

Regardless, if you venture on this subreddit people will assume you are a twenty something white man who has never had a relationship :(
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:18 AM
5

I'm curious if she tried actually dating any women. That would be a bit of a dick move. Dating people whom you have no intention of doing anything with for the sole reason of performing a social experiment?
/r/MensRights18/05/11 01:34 PM
4

Obviously there are. It's a spectrum ranging from "I don't remember much because I drank to much" to "I don't feel like it anymore, stop." to "Do it or I will shoot." going as far as kidnapping someone and repeatedly raping that person. I wouldn't want those varying degrees of rape to be judged equally.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 09:52 AM
5

That joke was half a minute of fear at best. If you pull this shit and then wait a week until saying it is a lie then that is a bitch move. A verbal joke scaring someone for less than a minute played out over the course of 9 months however? Lighten up.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 09:46 AM
3

The thing is, if I am not her biological father, I cannot have custody of her. Yet I will not be relieved of my support requirement either. Holy fuck... That's damn brutal.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 06:52 PM
-1

I’m a raging feminist yet [...] This is what I don't like. People labelling themselves feminists without knowing what it means. There are many sane feminists out there but most women think that because they have a vagina they are feminists by default. I know some very sexist women and some very sexist men. I feel that this advice column shows the difference perfectly. There is a woman writing in who thinks she can't love a man if he doesn't earn enough. She even goes as far as saying "he can’t c…
/r/MensRights16/05/11 11:31 AM
1

It would be really easy for that to backfire. She wants more money so she wants you to be the father in a legal sense? Say that you will sue for custody if she were to try and sue you for child support. That way, if she wins her case, she loses.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 11:18 AM
1

I scroll down and see the twitter search box thing. Top stories tagged child abuse. myfoxphoenix Mom Convicted of Child Abuse http://bit.ly/lPsQPV 1 day ago from twitterfeed myfoxphoenix Top Story: Mom Convicted of Child Abuse: A woman accused of dumping her newborn baby in a trash can last year ha... http://bit.ly/lPsQPV 1 day ago from twitterfeed Irony!
/r/MensRights14/05/11 07:39 AM
1

I fail :(
/r/MensRights13/05/11 05:00 PM
2

Abortion? No. Why bother if nothing good can come from it. You are going to abort it anyway. You can't make a woman bare a baby just because you want a child. Telling someone who wants to be a father that you are going to take away that chance could lead to some very weird harassment. (I once read a story about a guy who informed this girls mother that she had strayed from jesus' path by having an abortion and taking away his chance to become a father.) Fatherhood? TELL HIM! This has all differe…
/r/MensRights12/05/11 08:42 PM
1

So, then, you're saying that if we eliminated women being attractive no rape would ever occur? No, because like you I think a rapists urges are inevitable. We have different starting assumptions. You are assuming rapists are men who are turned on by rape, but also want a minimum attractiveness of their victims, and thus might not rape if they cannot find an appropriately hot victim. I believe rapists will commit rape whether women wear bee-keeper suits or stripper outfits Yup, that accurately su…
/r/MensRights11/05/11 05:25 PM
1

I think rapists are sick in their head and turned on by sick stuff. If rape is a matter of a sick man, who would eventually rape no matter what, then the clothes don't really matter Yes and no. Rapists will feel the need to rape no matter what and the ones who do rape will rape no matter what. But if a rapist were to stalk a local bar wanting to pick a victim, then that rapist will pick the victim most sexually appealing. If the rapist isn't particularly turned on by any of the women/girls then …
/r/MensRights10/05/11 01:41 PM
2

Well whether you like it or not it is the truth. A man who walks around with a rolex, or who parks his Bugatti in a crappy neighborhood is more likely to get robbed. A woman who is more sexually appealing is more likely to get raped. Fancy outfits, make-up, etc, are tools to make yourself more sexually appealing. This however doesn't mean that the victim deserve any blame whatsoever, but it can explain why the victim was targeted. This doesn't mean that the rapist is alleviated of any responsibi…
/r/MensRights10/05/11 08:12 AM
1

I think it is sad that the article pretends like she shouldn't have been arrested or something and that she got arrested despite the fact that he didn't want it, for looking crazy.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 07:45 AM
1

If I'm pissed off, or had a bad day, she is there for me. We try to make each other happy if we aren't. How is this not what a relationship should be? Have you got a partner? Nice downvoting skills. Do you always downvote those you disagree with?
/r/MensRights07/05/11 07:18 AM
9

So what? Women make mistakes just like men. Navy covers up whatever makes them look bad. I don't see anything here showing any sort of discrimination.
/r/MensRights06/05/11 07:31 AM
0

What kind of a relationship is that if your her punching bag? The kind where if she is in physical and emotional distress I support her.
/r/MensRights06/05/11 07:18 AM
2

Together with my gf 5 years within a week. Nope, no crazy here.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 10:46 PM
-1

If anything it is a reminder of female privilege, which is something feminists deny or downplay. If a woman can say "It's my hormones" as a valid excuse, and a man saying "It's my testosterone" isn't a valid excuse then this is relevant. This however is up for discussion, which is why this thread is here.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 10:45 PM
8

Maintaining composure during ones monthly cycle is something women perfect the world over. Again, you aren't all women in the world. Multiple women have confessed to bursting out in tears for no apparent reason here in this very thread. only American women I think you mistake me for an American. I don't even know any American women. If everyone else worldwide has the ability ... You are seriously over-reaching here. You don't claim to be every woman? Then how do you know how every women responds…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 09:06 PM
7

This may be shocking, but you aren't every woman ever.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:37 PM
2

This shows more about how the business of strip clubs works than it does about female oppression. Doesn't the same also stand for bars that charge men more for ladies night? Ladies night attracts many people to a bar and it is very profitable since women go for drinks and men go for women. If not enough women go to said bar/club/whatev then it will be less popular and lose customers and income. Having women pay less at bars is also more profitable, just like having women pay more at strip clubs.…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 05:24 PM
2

Unfair? yes. 10 bucks more entrance, 200,000 in damages? Yeah right... There is fighting the good fight and there is suing everybody in the hopes that you are that one person who gets filthy rich for tripping on an unregulated floor tile. This is the latter.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 05:19 PM
75

I would like to believe that is true, as I did previously, but my girlfriend has led me to believe otherwise. If someone is being a bit of a bitch and blaming it on hormones, that person is actually just a bitch. If someone is happy and giddy and crying and wanting hugs for no reason within a minute, hormones are at fault. PMS is a real thing, and mood swings do happen. The problem is, I would be a bit pissed off too if I had some recurring stomach cramps and had to shove a bit of cotton in myse…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 05:02 PM
9

Please do. If you were in a long term relationship and your partner is cheating on you, you would want to know.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 12:11 AM
1

Cabs don't go near campusses for the simple reason that students don't have money. Unlike in america cabs are rarely used for short trips. Thats what public transport is for. They are primarily for business men and people who need a ride to the airport. Hence cabs are very expensive. So putting a drunk girl in a strangers car is a better alternative? What makes a taxi so much safer than the company of fellow students? Lighten up man... We are students. We get waisted and sleep over at random peo…
/r/MensRights29/04/11 11:25 AM
2

see us as humans and not as sex objects. You really have no idea what this subreddit is about. I am in a very happy long term relationship and I don't like that you insinuate that I don't appreciate my girlfriend for who she is just because I think that in some ways men do have it worse than women. If you are looking for some sexism you have come to the wrong place. Granted, there might be the occasional troll here but rarely with positive karma.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 08:32 PM
3

What the hell's the problem with women being tough, strong, assertive and in positions of power? Nothing whatsoever. I would just like it that when a man is strong assertive and in a position of power it isn't regarded as something negative. Because I am not a passive little willow. And that's why you are great :D
/r/MensRights26/04/11 08:15 PM
3

Thank you bastards for making me inclined to be afraid of men in general when I was only really afraid of the crappy ones before. Though I understand that you are pissed off at a community that completely disagrees with you on something that you perceive to be a given, you can't deny that (thusfar) we have yet to resort to name-calling.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 08:11 PM
2

Your FAQ attacks a rather narrow version of feminism . You should not denigrate women just because they've got a vagina So which is it, either we attack all women or only the small group of crazy misandrists?
/r/MensRights26/04/11 07:59 PM
3

No true Scotsman? Your FAQ attacks a rather narrow version of feminism which might be described as radical and possibly separatist. You mean something like this?
/r/MensRights26/04/11 07:56 PM
3

I believe you mistake me for an American... Call a cab, lol.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 05:26 AM
2

Why? We asked if she was interested in a threesome long before we left and she said yes. We offered her a place to sleep since she needed one. We assumed she was a competent adult, turns out she wasn't. Do we tell her while she is walking home with us that she needs to sleep somewhere else because she is too drunk?
/r/MensRights25/04/11 03:49 PM
1

I think she'd be too embarrassed to even open her mouth. So did I...
/r/MensRights25/04/11 03:45 PM
2

Since it is probably inevitable that some feminist will ask these questions I will pre-emptively answer them here; Yes I want a threesome with two women. My girlfriend wants this too. Really, she wants this too. She is a adult who can say what she does and doesn't want. No I don't think threesomes are degrading in any way. Yes we have had a threesome with another guy.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 01:59 PM
5

if you approach her directly and talk about the situation, she will be calmer. Or if you somehow overtake her in a non-threatening way and then jokingly ask her why SHE is following you. I shouldn't have to play theatre to walk in a hallway.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 07:20 PM
6

It doesn't matter. What matters is that he/she made some life choices and he/she shouldn't have to be beaten up for wanting to go to the toilet.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 06:57 PM
1

Half of those are actually crimes. But I guess it is all right because domestic violence is funny if he is a man and deserved it, right?
/r/MensRights09/04/11 04:01 AM
1

What is the point of prison then? If it is all fun and games then what is the point of prison. Wouldn't we send nobel prize winners to prison to reward them and murderers get the hellish punishment of living the way they want to?
/r/MensRights02/04/11 05:25 PM
2

doesn't seem that far from some time in jail or in the county prison. You've obviously never been to prison. The luxury of being able to wake up in your own home, walk outside of the house to do some shopping, deciding what you eat and when you eat it, meeting who you want and deciding when or where, the privacy to do what you want in your own home.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 05:24 PM
4

So you want to ruin the life of a very sorry and miserable woman who made a very bad decision while drunk when in all likelihood she probably wants to do her best to atone for her mistake? Wait, being drunk is an excuse for killing someone? Every single person who kills someone is remorseful. Every single killer wants to atone for their mistakes. That is what they all say...
/r/MensRights02/04/11 12:32 PM
3

I watched some of that, and I simply could not continue. Yes, there will always be people who believe in batshit insane stuff. The difference is that these batshit insane people are organized and enjoy wide support. I fear for the world.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 10:51 PM
0

Hi there cliffor, or whatever you choose to call yourself. Nice to see you trolling here too.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 12:00 AM
1

Isn't that just arguing semantics? The point is both genders should be at the same level.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 08:09 PM
8

It is great to hear you have a nice father who was able to teach you about how the world works. Sorry about the trolls here.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 08:04 PM
4

If I hear the word "patriarchy" from a feminist that's a good signal that it's time to stop arguing with them because they're delusional. There isn't some male-dominated illuminati specifically making sure that women don't become CEOs or any stupid shit like that. This a million times. Asking feminists to campaign for the rights of men is the stupidest thing I've ever heard Unfortunately there are those who believe that feminism=equality.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 07:25 PM
7

In my case the answers would be: Yes they do. Very true. Some women can't walk down the street or go to work without being harassed. I do support equal rights. There are feminists who are true to their cause, but there are also many feminists who think that women are more valuable. The gross majority of feminists fail to take into account that just because the scales are tipped in favour of men (in general) doesn't mean that men aren't occasionally the victims of inequality. Due to the "you are …
/r/MensRights27/03/11 06:49 PM
3

Let me try to ignore the insults and go straight for the arguments here. Sure there are legitimate examples of men being treated unfairly. But what seems to be enraging so many of you is the fact that you misconstrue the dismantling of unjust privilege with an assault on men. I was completely with you up until this part. Just because there is inequality for women doesn't mean that male inequality isn't an acceptable cause to rally against. You say that we misconstrue feminisms attempt at making …
/r/MensRights27/03/11 06:03 PM
1

Great, pointless slut shaming. That's what this subreddit needs in order to not look like an actual movement instead of just a bunch of sexists...
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:08 PM
1

The question of whether or not a man can achieve greatness is never asked by mens rights activists since we already know men can, and so can women. The reason why feminism needed to show this is because a long time ago female role models, female heroines and female power players were rare if not non-existent. We men have never had to look around us and ask the question "can I achieve greatness?" We already know we can. The problem is that for some reason people think that since men can do this n…
/r/MensRights21/02/11 02:06 PM
74

Next up, 15 ways to trick your woman into doing the dishes.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 08:14 AM
15

I really hope it is a troll, but would a troll go through a 6 month wait just to build up a backstory?
/r/MensRights07/02/11 02:06 PM
6

Someone in my school who was in a relationship was accused of rape. This accusation came from another girl who spends loads of time with said guy. A bunch of guys (think 8 people) beats up the alleged rapist. The police gets called once the school finds out what is going on. When pressed the girl refuses to press charges. The girl then proceeds to spend time with the guy she accused after this whole affair. Women don't spend time with their rapists. This doesn't happen. Either she wanted to brea…
/r/MensRights06/02/11 09:53 AM
9

In January 1996 an industrial tribunal found the Labour Party had broken the law, unanimously ruling that all-women shortlists were illegal under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 in preventing men from entering a profession. . Following the reduction in women MPs after the 2001 general election and increased lobbying by gender equality advocates, Labour introduced the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002, which allows parties to use positive discrimination in the selection of candida…
/r/MensRights03/02/11 02:29 PM
0

Is everyone so jaded here that they can't buy their girlfriends flowers once a year? I don't think anyone is saying that. I just think some are surprised because some (me included) think that valentines isn't a day for her, but a day for both of us. Somewhat similar to an anniversary.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 02:23 PM
2

Steak and a blowjob day is funny, but it is also not really something you want to celebrate with your girlfriend because if she doesn't like giving blowjobs then you are basically guilt tripping her into blowing you, or making her feel guilty if she doesn't. On valentines me and my girlfriend spend a day together, we both buy each other something small like chocolates and a card. We both have fun, and that is it. Then both of us try to have an awesome day. I don't see it as her day, because if a…
/r/MensRights03/02/11 02:20 PM
1

I'm curious, how do you get an @reddit.com email adress?
/r/MensRights03/02/11 02:04 PM
2

A CHICK. The fact that calling someone a woman counts as an insult to you says more than enough about you and your website. On this subreddit we don't like sexism.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 02:04 PM
6

Honestly, I think it is trolling. Maybe you think it is something they should see, but if feminists were to come here and massively upvote feminist articles and websites we would be pissed off as well. I hate it when there are "mensrights" websites that are just about how men should no longer oppress women. Let them have their community because we want ours. If you want to change an opinion you have to be upfront about it. By being sneaky like that you only annoy.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 01:59 PM
6

You are completely right. I don't feel comfortable around black people, transgendered people, and the gays. They should all be separated from me because else I might have my poor little feelings hurt, and we wouldn't want that now would we? My feelings matter so much that other people should be restricted because of them. Stuff I also think should never happen; Gay marriage. Gay adoption. Breastfeeding in public. Interracial marriage. Promiscuity in media. Teens being taught what a condom is. Ab…
/r/MensRights03/02/11 01:53 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-women_shortlists
/r/MensRights03/02/11 01:37 PM
20

it's full of questionable evidence, outright generalisations, stereotypes (of women AND men), hypocrisy and general ignorance. I wouldn't dare downvote as you are completely right. The writer had me up until the point where he started criticising women for allegedly being meaner, more brutal, and downright evil. I was dumbfounded by that because it was so sudden. First he makes a statement about how women who claim the crisis is the fault of penis owners are sexists, then the very next thing he …
/r/MensRights27/01/11 07:50 PM
9

Your wife may be the biggest cunt on earth for doing this, but your son is your son no matter what. Top comment. People think the wife is a bitch, but the son is his son regardless. You can't love a child for so many years and then back out because your DNA doesn't match. His wife cheated, but that is not the sons fault. Some of the highly rated comments; I see a lot of comments telling you to forgive your wife, but fuck that. [...] Staying with your wife for the sake of the child is the absolut…
/r/MensRights24/01/11 06:10 PM
2

This could easily be made not sexist if you say that second earners get a tax break. Why they didn't word it that way I wouldn't know...
/r/MensRights23/01/11 03:34 PM
18

A curfew on men would be considered a monstrous idea, even though most women live with internalised curfews anyway. . Your mother, your sister, your daughter are being told to stay inside and not complain too much. Take up knitting or vajazzling maybe? This woman lives on a different planet. You know what?! You can't have a mothering society, in which there are many women only venues and laws to protect women because they are oh so vulnerable, and at the same time get mad whenever someone is con…
/r/MensRights16/01/11 12:38 AM
14

Who could help this helpless weak crying woman? Who should help her? Men of course! Because for some reason men are responsible. Of course it is men their duty to serve women in the most stereotypical way possible, by being handymen. I am sure that when she comes home to her partner he is up in arms about her not having made dinner yet, after which her partner rants about how there are no suitable house-wives any more. Do you know what he said? ‘To do that I would have to stand in the road and I…
/r/MensRights07/01/11 05:35 PM
1

I know it has made me a complete womanizer, and has taken much willpower to actually want a relationship over simple random fucking. Because men being overly interested in sex is a new phenomenon?
/r/MensRights02/01/11 11:05 PM
1

Both me and my girlfriend thoroughly enjoy our hazardous opiates. I don't mean to boast, but I consider myself a fairly selfless person. I know, you must be asking yourself this question; "How does a guy who watches action movies not start to consider human life as expendable?" Well, let me tell you. Most of the time, action movies play in cinemas and television. Rest assured, if an armed assailant were to wander through my neighbourhood I would not try to disarm him, murder him, or in any way e…
/r/MensRights01/01/11 06:19 PM
2

I was literally going to post "This is old copy pasta" Group think in /r/mensrights!!!!
/r/MensRights01/01/11 06:01 PM
2

It's not that, it is just that some accuse us of being an annoying bunch of angry men who are mad at their exes. I thought that this is nice because it shows how we aren't as bad as some want us to seem.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 09:34 PM
6

Quite the opposite. I am excited because all men here weren't anti-woman. It shows that we aren't that bad as a community.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 04:22 PM
1

Terrorism ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights29/12/10 12:34 PM
7

even if you don’t intend to be creepy but can reasonably suspect you will make the person uncomfortable – is immoral in my book. Ugly people are immoral!
/r/MensRights29/12/10 02:31 AM
4

It's understandable that they use an attractive man because it is an advert for body building.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 09:19 AM
3

Past; Feminism: There is sexism against women. We must bridge the gender gap. Present; Feminism: The gender gap is now favouring us. We must learn to accept it.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 03:45 PM
7

Even for boys not as talented or as physical as their female teammates, some coaches and parents argue that they should not play because they would be displacing girls from teams, thereby reducing the opportunities afforded girls and women under Title IX, the 1972 legislation that prohibits discrimination in educational programs that receive federal funds. So what if they displace girls in favour of boys? The sport is vastly dominated by girls. That's like a man saying "but women in a corporate …
/r/MensRights03/12/10 09:31 PM
2

Even if he was a full on rapist, Interpol's most wanted? Come on. We all know he is on there for political reasons.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 09:09 PM
-1

Because interpols most wanted list usually has people on it who are wanted for a broken condom? Fuck, turns out I am an international criminal then. (it was with me and my gf and she is on the pill, so we are fine)
/r/MensRights03/12/10 07:48 PM
1

I hate to resort to ad hominems, but this woman clearly doesn't understand what sex is. Sex can be a mutually enjoyable thing. This woman wrote this gem: we form emotional bonds with men we have fucked, that are inappropriate, and not reciprocal. Because men don't form any kind of emotions. Men with feelings? Fuck that shit, all men are just walking rape machines looking to destroy women and secure the patriarchy. Also, sex is not dangerous for men? Men can still get diseases and if the woman be…
/r/MensRights26/11/10 10:22 PM
4

everyone would make the choice at 18 anyway. Interested to hear what you think. Everybody except the population of europe and asia.
/r/MensRights25/11/10 12:09 AM
0

At my university they have only one bathroom in a certain building on the ground floor. The building had a male sign but after a while it had a male and a female sign, and it worked. Guys pee at the urinals and women go to the booths. It's not like a guy is going to peek over the booth wall or a woman is going to stand at a urinal and casually look to the left and right as if a woman has a reason to stand infront of a urinal. Eventually they got rid of the women's sign and turned it back into a …
/r/MensRights24/11/10 11:38 PM
1

My school had twice as many female as male bathrooms in the common area. Though I think this has a logistical aspect to it. One woman needs one booth, whereas in a men's toilet you can just have a big line of urinals and a couple of booths. Plus peeing goes faster for men and doesn't require toilet paper.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 11:30 PM
1

I think posts like this show that you are obviously trolling. Here you complain in /r/atheism about /r/christianity. Here you post in /r/christianity with a picture mocking jesus. This shows that you were purposefully trolling. You are a troll and stop pretending that /r/mensrights doesn't have a very tolerant attitude towards those who disagree. We may downvote, but we do not censor.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 11:20 PM
4

When I saw the title I thought "Oh great, an excited MRA who thinks that personally attacking an important feminist is a good idea" Turns out I shouldn't be so quick to judge. This woman's story is amazing and her quotations are great. Pizzey says it was after death threats against her, her children, her grandchildren, and the killing of her dog, all of which she states were perpetrated by feminist activists, that she left England for North America. Damn ... Pizzey is still actively working to h…
/r/MensRights24/11/10 10:54 PM
12

Winnie the Pooh trolling the Hundred Acre Wood for bear poon with his wingman Piglet I love this post.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 03:28 PM
37

Do those characters even have genders?
/r/MensRights24/11/10 03:08 PM
3

Those darn kids with their macarena's and their dirty dancing.
/r/MensRights21/11/10 12:29 AM
5

Wow... Dancing is cheating now? Do you keep your woman locked up in the basement or something?
/r/MensRights20/11/10 11:32 PM
2

According to Joanna Birenbaum, legal director of the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund, the concept of advance consent is both “dangerous and regressive.” She says that consent is something that must be continuous and consciously made. So, for example, if a man and woman were having consensual sex, and the woman changed her mind and told him she wanted to stop, if he did not do so at that moment it would be rape. Consent, according to feminists, is only valid if it is revocable at any time…
/r/MensRights17/11/10 10:35 PM
23

It an easy way to dismiss an argument without examining it. "Oh, you are a white male? That means you are privileged and not authorised to talk about certain stuff"
/r/MensRights17/11/10 08:18 PM
25

I left r/mensrights for pretty much the same reason. As a man, I'm fully aware of the the issues men face today, but instead of discussing how men can work on these issues, all I saw were extreme examples being used to show misandry. I don't want to be a victim, I want to fix things. I completely agree, but many don't even acknowledge that men face issues. To say that men are at times not the ones with all the advantages is blasphemy and to suggest that sometimes men are the ones getting the sho…
/r/MensRights10/11/10 09:14 PM
3

I really dislike the "check your privilege" phrase. It sounds sort of like this logical fallacy. Since "If you get raped it was your own fault" is already a crappy argument, you should be able to counter it without resorting to "you can't understand me because you have a penis". If that doesn't work, move on. The person you are arguing with is a fucktard. Yes you can whine all you want about his privilege and your lack thereof, or you can move on. I am an atheist white man. I was pretty much bor…
/r/MensRights06/11/10 01:50 PM
2

If I were to go around and call a girl a slut, bitch, tramp, etc, just because she tried to come on to me then that would be called sexual harassment. He wasn't enjoying the accusations after an appropriate ass grab (I never thought I would be able to say "Appropriate ass grab")
/r/MensRights06/11/10 01:22 PM
5

I love Dan Savage. I posted some of his stuff here earlier because he is awesome.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 09:28 PM
23

Correction: you were the victim of sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 08:56 PM
20

I don't know. The article headline is highly volatile, as tomek77 said, "How to raise girls into marriageable women" would cause a shitstorm. But I understand the content of the article and agree with it to an extent. Guys shouldn't be afraid to show their emotions and feelings (as too many are) but to say that these qualities are feminine and that masculine qualities are bad is just plain wrong. We know what we get when a boy is raised with the code, says Pollack: a mask of masculinity, false b…
/r/MensRights03/11/10 04:10 PM
5

Also known as "equal rights, except if inequality is advantageous to me"
/r/MensRights31/10/10 08:57 AM
8

when you compare the sexual behaviors of cut vs. uncut men, you find that circumcised men seek more intense stimulation to get off. I read somewhere that with some circumcised men the knob is actually not the most sensitive part of the penis. This was absolutely mind boggling.
/r/MensRights29/10/10 04:55 PM
1

Luckily, she just outed herself as "that crazy ex" to a lot of people by sending that email.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 02:09 PM
3

Solution; demand shared custody. All you need to do is demand and all of a sudden the woman wont need any money any more for her children.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 03:19 PM
2

When I am on my best behaviour for someone else and I can tell it is not appreciated then I will no longer treat that person as I would before. I remember once going out with my girlfriend's female friends. Most of them were nice and we were all buying drinks for each other which I appreciate. I return the favour and buy some drinks for all of them. A while later we are out of drinks and we ask one of the girls if she will get some. She says "I don't pay for my own drinks". All night I get to lo…
/r/MensRights16/10/10 09:35 PM
6

the Men's Rights community should think about that harder before they label boys as "less good at reading" ?
/r/MensRights16/10/10 08:57 AM
4

Sometimes people don't care about a certain subject, and your gender does have an effect on what you care about. Some departments barely have any guys in it as well. I go to a college and on the campus I am at there are two departments. Theatre and computer science/engineering. It comes as no surprise that whenever you see a group of girls walk around everybody already knows what they study. The same goes for the group of guys that walks around. In my class we have around 10 women and 130 people…
/r/MensRights16/10/10 08:54 AM
1

I know many here don't like chivalry but I do. What went wrong here is that a woman used her looks to get what she wants and the guy just let her. The chivalrous thing to do would be to be nice to the girl who was already standing in line. Or if you are standing in front of the hot guy, you just ask the op what she wants and combine your two orders so the hot guy and hot girl have to wait a bit. You don't have to be an asshole to be chivalrous.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 08:43 AM
-2

Why does this have dutch subtitles if the people are german?
/r/MensRights11/10/10 02:17 PM
-2

This post is so sexist it hurts. Young white men are all retarded and mature women are fucking angels.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 01:35 PM
3

False rape accusations are terrible. I'm not denying that. They ruin lives. But I'm sorry, I don't see how this proves anything one way or another. All this is is speculation. This. And the fact that there are pictures of the girl being raped where you can clearly see the details. It is almost standard that when someone is raped there are many of that persons peers who act surprised and can simply not admit that a rape could have occurred. The pictures speak for themselves and the pictures have …
/r/MensRights19/09/10 05:53 AM
7

Wow.... I dont think you know what feminism means (like most people) It doesn't mean role reversal. It is really not this: My wife believes in total gender role reversal. The woman is the new man, and the man is the new submissive. Does she complain that I don't have a job? Ha. She knows I've been looking, but as she always says, "Honey, it's just not a man's world anymore. Your time is up." There is not supposed to be a submissive and a dominant. There is supposed to be equality. This is what f…
/r/MensRights16/09/10 11:07 AM
1

Because of the horrible nature of the site, I decided to go there and click perfect match or pick the obviously uglier one every time.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 02:59 PM
3

Not really, but the Flemish separatist party is currently the biggest party in Belgium and the day before yesterday a major Walloon politicians announced that everybody should brace themselves for a split up Belgium. The Flemish party has since denied that but Walloons still fear this because they tried to form a coalition government and apparently the Walloons made a lot of concessions and still the big Flemish party wouldn't take the deal. Also, the Walloons rely heavily on Flemish money. If B…
/r/MensRights06/09/10 06:23 PM
6

Yup
/r/MensRights06/09/10 02:39 PM
3

Because guys don't get robbed or car-jacked. Nope. Only women need protection from crime. Women are trophies that we as a society have to guard. They are also vulnerable and insecure creatures. Treating women like this is in no way sexist or condescending at all. So yeah, lets give these weak women who need as much protection as they can get benefits.
/r/MensRights05/09/10 07:41 PM
1

Disregard my first post, I am retarded.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 11:14 PM
-1

1 in 1000? The disease wouldn't be able to survive that way. The average human has an amount of sexual partners under 20.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 10:25 PM
3

Wait, was he sorry? Because she got off with a warning because she was sorry. Because saying sorry is good enough when you infect someone with a deadly disease.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 10:23 PM
6

To be honest, that is the character. He is unnecessarily rude, sexist, and occasionally racist. He insults whenever he can and is an all together unpleasant person. Maybe you are offended, but so what? He is mean to everybody. Hugh Laurie was hired to play someone who is very offensive. The whole show is centred around that.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 03:27 PM
2

To be honest. People who get a circumcision write the same type of stuff. "My sex is better" "My wife loves it" etc etc. They are all invalid arguments to begin with. If you get a circumcision later in life, odds are that you are not satisfied with your foreskin. Maybe you think it looks weird or feel inadequate. You get it, the feelings are gone. The wife is happy because you are happy and lets be honest, the penis looks different. You have to try it your new penis. The same applies to getting …
/r/MensRights27/08/10 12:31 PM
4

Just FYI, I resent that you pretend anyone disagreeing with you is a feminist troll using multiple accounts by default. I am a different person from all the other people posting here.
/r/MensRights27/08/10 12:10 PM
10

Time magazine recently published a list called Best 100 Novels of All Time. There were only 16 women on it. I always assumed that things would improve [..] But they haven’t. Men are still the gold standard and successful women are the deviants Lets see, how many of these novels have been published in the last 50 years? (since feminism started for real) There are 35,000 works of art in the Louvre’s collection and only 13 are by women. As we all know, most of the art in the Louvre has been made af…
/r/MensRights26/08/10 11:44 PM
8

Wow. Is it that easy to ban someone from a subreddit where he/she hasn't even posted based on a comment that isn't even bad?
/r/MensRights26/08/10 11:27 PM
8

Wow, she must have hit the jackpot by having sex with 3 men and infecting one.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 06:12 PM
2

This might also work for an abusive relationship, and the added bonus is that in the heat of the discussion she did confess to abusing him. When he asked "Does he yell back at you", we all know her response "I don't know" actually means "No, he doesn't" I feel like a heartless bastard, but listening to the dumpings is comedy gold. It is very lame not to break up with someone in person, but the couple of dumpings I listened to thusfar had abuse in them and a guy who repeatedly tried to dump her, …
/r/MensRights26/08/10 11:07 AM
3

What an intelligent and creative attorney, I'm dumbfounded as to why he didn't win his case. Well ... he has to defend his client. Playing the victim card is the only thing there is left to do, even if it is really stupid.
/r/MensRights25/08/10 09:58 AM
5

sweet
/r/MensRights24/08/10 07:06 PM
15

Exactly. She says she never wanted to murder anyone and that it was an accident. She did want to murder someone and when she got in that car it was fully well her intent to murder the person she saw.
/r/MensRights21/08/10 08:23 PM
9

If these were google searches and someone was logged in (google/gmail account) then it actually saves those searches and it timestamps them. (careful, it only saves those for a couple of months)
/r/MensRights19/08/10 08:15 PM
1

Because there is no argument in favour of it? There is peer pressure, but that argument is invalid since if everybody would cut off their pinky finger you would be the odd one out with an intact pinky finger. If everybody would just not cut off their pinky finger there would be no problem. There is the reduced risk of STD's but that is retarded because if you are going to use your circumcision as a way of protecting yourself you will get infected nonetheless. If you take that into account and th…
/r/MensRights17/08/10 07:25 PM
3

What the fuck. And pink just abuses a man in her clip and gets away with it.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 12:19 PM
2

I would prefer it if people don't rush over there to call her a bitch or anything because there is already a consensus that she wasn't raped.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 12:08 PM
5

Can we just ban this submission? If NaqeebJamal really wants this to happen he should pm jayhammers. I don't think it is appropriate to taunt people and involve their loved ones.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 06:33 PM
5

How about you prove that your girlfriend exists and post pictures online or something. I'm serious and I'm not trying to be a dick.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 06:24 PM
3

Can't we just say that we do not want this person to have anything to do with our subreddit?
/r/MensRights03/08/10 08:55 PM
3

Learn English dumbass. I have no idea what you just wrote.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 07:36 PM
2

Click your username and then click on submitted. Now go away. Edit: You haven't even submitted anything yet before this, no wonder you couldn't find anything.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 06:51 PM
3

Men and women should be treated equally. Has gotten many downvotes :(
/r/MensRights03/08/10 06:46 PM
9

Though many will find the idea laughable, I consider myself both a MRA and a feminist. I don't consider the two to be mutually exclusive. It is undeniable that in many parts of the world women are treated as lesser beings (I'm looking at you, Middle East) This has led to the belief that women are always the ones being discriminated against, which is again far from the truth. (Yes Europe and America, this one is for you) Sometimes I downvote things I find inappropriate here and sometimes I upvote…
/r/MensRights01/08/10 10:01 AM
4

I disagree with the pendulum analogy. It is why many people think it only women are discriminated against and that men are always the the people who reap the rewards. Neither this nor the opposite is true. Continueing with the same analogy, in reality there are thousands of litle pendulums. In some ways its easier to be a guy, and in some ways its easier to be a girl. We should stop saying one side is always the winner/loser and look at each aspect of society individually.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 04:44 PM
11

And you can also get raped in the ass. Edit: and coercion under threat of violence. And drugs (or hypnosis) Or the guy can be too young to consent.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 06:35 PM
1

I didn't see this was already posted in the mensrights subreddit (though it was posted on other subreddits) and I thought this would be appreciated here. If you don't like it, just downvote.
/r/MensRights21/07/10 05:25 PM
28

This is amazingly retarded since the woman did what she did of her own free will and the man did not force her in any way. It happens that women regret sex and accuse the man of rape, but at the trial the women usually pretend to have been actually raped. This is the first time I have seen a woman openly admit she was not coerced and did it of her own free will, yet it still counts as rape. Guess what retard, if you fuck someone within the first couple of hours of meeting that person, they proba…
/r/MensRights21/07/10 12:23 PM
13

Completely agree with you. Problem is, a lot of the times, the voice calling women who have sex sluts comes from their own head. I have a friend (20) who had only ever had two boyfriends, and as a result she had only had sex with two people. She just broke up with her long term boyfriend and after a month or so, she had a one night stand because she didn't want a new relationship but she did want sex. She talked to me about it and was flat out saying "Yeah, I know, I am a bit of a slut."
/r/MensRights16/07/10 07:46 PM
2

What do you think of the alternative of only sleeping with people one thinks are trustworthy? Just because you think someone is trustworthy doesn't mean that person is. Many people get cheated on by people they trust. Many people divorce after having been together for a decade. (yes, my world is a dark and bitter place) Plus, two people don't have to trust each other well to have a simple one night stand because the chance of something like this happening is tiny.
/r/MensRights07/07/10 09:06 PM
2

why do you say he had a good reason to videotape sex? Do I have to spell it out? Because it guarded him from a rape allegation. It isn't because she is a woman, it is because they weren't familiar enough to trust each other. I'm not saying marital rape doesn't happen (because it does and it is a real problem) but if you are together with someone for a long time then it is a lot less likely that person will falsely claim you raped her/him. Yeah, the chance that this guy would hook up with a false…
/r/MensRights07/07/10 08:15 PM
7

I think it is disgusting that the only way a man who is falsely accused of rape can clear his name is by committing a crime. (the videotaping of the sex) This means that in those situations, when you are charged with raping someone you have by default committed a crime. If you are innocent you need to prove it (unlike other crimes where you are innocent until proven guilty) and to prove it you need to commit a crime. Also, it is fucking fantastic that the women (who is proven to be a liar) still…
/r/MensRights07/07/10 08:04 AM
4

So if it is true, as Kimmel claims, that many young male denizens of Guyland do not respect young females, perhaps to some degree it is because "the guys," like any normal person, find it very hard to feel respect for someone who relates to them in ways that are hypocritical. Maybe, despite all the "minuses" that Kimmel describes about Guyland, young men tend to bond with their male peers instead of their female peers because their relationships among themselves tend to be inherently more honest…
/r/MensRights04/07/10 07:40 PM
2

I know exactly what this guy is talking about. One of my gf's friends wants to get laid. She needs to get laid. She is actively looking to get laid. She is really hot and smart and whatever. The problem? She never gets laid. Why? Because she is scared to death of the one-night-stand because she wouldn't be able to reconcile that with her own pride. I can't stand it. Both women and men like sex, but only one gender is courageous enough to admit it :(
/r/MensRights04/07/10 03:44 PM
2

However I'm not opposed to anyone who does do that. Come on, there is barely a line between encouraging harassment and giving others the means to do so on a silver platter. I know it is technically different, but you can't tell me you don't see how the two overlap.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 09:55 PM
8

I think in the context of this reddit it takes on a different tone. I also think that most people view feminists in a slightly sour light anyway - the notion of bra-burning bull dykes isn't what i'd call "positive" I would like to say we are better than that, but sometimes we aren't. It is inevitable that with the issues which MRA's find important you will also attract people who just really hate their ex-wife and are mad. This however doesn't negate some of the points that we try to make. (Ther…
/r/MensRights30/06/10 09:48 PM
9

Wait, you mean there is more to reddit than just this one subreddit? I don't spend most of my time hating, though I am having a rather vigorous discussion about car safety somewhere else. Anyways, I made a post on why I think that posting about the fringe cases of feminists that are somewhat crazy can be useful here. Maybe it might interest you.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 09:30 PM
14

So, again, for the last time - Why the fuck do you want to spend your time getting angry about what isolated crazy fuckers on the internet say? Why not spend your energies and time more wisely because sitting on the internet finding outrageous things to be angry about is a rather full time job. I know, what kind of weird person would spend a lot of his or her time arguing against what some isolated crazy community thinks. Who would spend all of their time arguing with such a community that espou…
/r/MensRights30/06/10 09:15 PM
1

No. You know what this reminds me of? OMG THIS GUY IS A TOTAL PEDO, EVERYBODY HARRAS HIM ON FACEBOOK We are not vigilantes. The police should handle her and we should handle the police if they refuse to exact justice.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 09:04 PM
4

If you're aiming to project this person's craziness on all other feminists like I often see around here, then you're terribly misguided. The problem is, some people see gender equality as one set of scales. If one side is held higher and the other lower then there is inequality. One side is always either higher or lower, there is no middle ground. Naturally this is not how it works. I won't deny that women in general have a tough time in our society. I didn't think blatant sexual harassment on t…
/r/MensRights30/06/10 01:26 PM
5

Most of the data fail to distinguish between a father and the income a father provides, or between the presence of a father and the presence of a second parent, regardless of gender. I don't see how this proves fathers are not necessary. If the gender isn't relevant isn't this equally valid proof for the argument that mothers aren't necessary [Single mom's] children do better on standardized tests and have higher grades, and teenagers of single moms are actually less likely to engage in delinque…
/r/MensRights14/06/10 10:38 AM
5

You might need this.
/r/MensRights10/06/10 11:36 AM
17

In movies male rape (by women) is almost accepted. I remember watching 40 days and 40 nights. The guy was half asleep and horny, then a girl he hates comes in, he is handcuffed to the bed, she rides him and then leaves. This was sex without consent, and both him and the girl knew he wasn't willing. What happens? The guy has to apologize for being raped. The girl then has to forgive him. Edit: found something interesting.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 09:39 PM
9

Rubber band around the base of the penis makes it hard enough to fuck. Also, just because someone is aroused doesn't mean it is consensual. You could be aroused from something else. (imagine a woman who walks home from a party and she is horny because she was dancing with a hot guy. Someone then grabs the woman, drags her to an alley, and rapes her.)
/r/MensRights05/06/10 09:39 PM
7

wife calls 911 but refuses to stop the bleeding with a towel I heard the 911 call and it was horrible. The "wife" refused to stop the bleeding or even go into the same room as Gary because she doesn't like seeing blood. She was whining about possibly being traumatized if she would go help him, so she preferred not to. Edit: Top two comments here say all.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 03:04 PM
3

"if you like it put a ring on it" I know! the first time I heard that song I was like "did she just refer to people as it" I was the only one who thought this was weird :(
/r/MensRights02/06/10 09:42 AM
2

There is a difference. When someone does all of the above they aren't harassing someone. Also, If I were to meet someone who professes to me that she thinks that the twilight series have the best books/movies ever, then yes, I will consider that her expectations for what a relationship entails are a bit different than mine. If I were to meet a girl that is an avid cosmo reader, then I would (unwillingly, and perhaps unjustly) think less of her. If I were to meet a girl who has many vibrators, I …
/r/MensRights27/05/10 10:04 AM
3

She was snooping for no reason, which shouldn't really be done. I will give you that. But it could be possible that the way he entertains himself sexually is indicative of how he thinks of women in general or what he expects of women with whom he is in a sexual relationship. If this guy is gonna wind up wanting some masochism or humiliation in the bedroom, then that is something that concerns her. No reason to freak out though, she should just talk to him.
/r/MensRights27/05/10 12:04 AM
2

Meh, he says dirty things to pornstars. The guy is a bit weird, and the girl is a bit disrespectful. Don't really care either way. I just don't like that the girl assumes he is a misogynist who is going to hurt her but I can't really blame her for that since what he is doing is pretty weird. The fact that he has never acted that way towards her counts for nothing to her, and that is again, weird. So to summarize; I don't care and they are both ... weird.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 11:57 PM
1

In school, the girls of our class would always do much better. Why? because they get sympathy for being girls. Whenever there is a male teacher that did something they didn't like they would throw hissy fits and the teacher would always cave. I have never been able to convince a teacher I deserved a better grade than the one I got. For the girls it was standard procedure to start begging (successfully) for extra points if their grade wasn't good enough. Don't get me wrong though. I don't blame t…
/r/MensRights26/05/10 11:36 PM
4

Whoah... Please try to see a counselor alone, or press charges against her. Whether the police likes it or not, if you make a complaint they normally have to start an investigation.
/r/MensRights25/05/10 02:31 PM
10

The best rated comment on that website: My wife has been physically and verbally abusive, we have two children and I am worried about the affect on them. I eventually got both of us into a counselling session, I explained that there was abuse in our relationship that I wanted to discuss before I could go further I was told that I had to leave the session as my wife could'nt be expected to be open while under the threat of violence. These were house rules. I was so shocked I just left. And so thi…
/r/MensRights25/05/10 01:23 PM
3

Two years ago in Texas, a four-year-old was punished for sexual harassment after a teacher's aide accused the pre-schooler of pressing his face into her breasts during a hug. Oh ffs. They are pillows for him, nothing more. If a kid doesn't know what sex is and doesn't feel any sexual feelings, how can it commit a sex offense? I get that kids might touch people in the wrong places, or say wrong things, but that is what kids do.
/r/MensRights25/05/10 01:01 PM
2

Though I completely agree with you and I would consider the same option, I am sure many others wouldn't. People can form a very strong emotional bond with the child once it has been born.
/r/MensRights20/05/10 02:15 PM
1

Suzanne Fortier, head of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) was one of the people asked by Clement to look into the selection process and she argues that the problem mainly boils down to too few women in the pool of applicants. Women aren’t heavily represented at senior levels in the fields of research where the federal government was looking for research chairs, Fortier said. The four main areas include: environmental sciences and technologies; natural resources and e…
/r/MensRights20/05/10 02:06 PM
5

At a National Abortion Federation conference in the early 1990s, Claire Keyes, the former director of a Pittsburgh abortion clinic, says she tried to incorporate a male-inclusive agenda—one-on-one counseling for men, a public journal where they could express their thoughts and feelings, pamphlets tailored to their experiences—but was shot down. “There were people who were shouting at me, saying, ‘This is not about men; this is about women, and we have fought long and hard to get men’s hands off …
/r/MensRights20/05/10 01:24 PM
2

They gave me an compliment, then I told them to shut up. For some strange reason they didn't like it. Makes perfect sense to me. Found this gem on Holla back New York: you have the right to feel safe, confident, and sexy, without being the object of some turd's fantasy. Thats right, they want to right to be sexy. Sexy meaning sexually appealing. They want to be sexually appealing without others thinking about them in a sexual manner. Let that sink in.
/r/MensRights19/05/10 10:33 PM
1

This completely reminds me of this earlier submission. TL;DR She basically says how her mother hated her as a child because a child restricts your own freedom. The daughter later becomes happily married and a successful writer. The daughter then starts her own family and because she was so stupid as to want children she was shunned by her mother who now no longer regards her as her child. Notable highlights; the mother encouraged sex when the daughter was 13, helped her get her first abortion at…
/r/MensRights19/05/10 06:12 PM
2

Very good and informative video. (he went out and interviewed people for this, which is an A for effort) Though I didn't like the Hitler reference. It is easy to throw Hitler into an argument but all it does is it makes you look bad. Maybe charities are lying, but Hitler mass murdered, charities possible take more money than they should. Not comparable in the least.
/r/MensRights14/05/10 02:08 PM
2

Now imagine this person were a single parent with an average/low paying job. I would like to see someone like that raise 500k for their defense.
/r/MensRights13/05/10 09:42 PM
6

This is a somewhat old article and the results are in: 3 Years with first possibility of parole in 1 year What I think is interesting is how there is DNA evidence that suggests he is not a rapist. This evidence was only beginning to get uncovered after a couple of years. The evidence was not used in the original trial I guess. Usually when people are cleared of wrong doing through DNA evidence it is because DNA tests didn't exist back when the crime was committed. Apparently DNA evidence wasn't …
/r/MensRights08/05/10 10:42 PM
2

Downvote this one, and upvote the above to prevent duplicates. (just posting here so people know which to downvote/hide and which to upvote)
/r/MensRights30/04/10 02:53 PM
1

I can't tell if you're arguing for abortion or against it here. I was doing neither. I just was trying to explain why I thought you were wrong when you said that everything should be legal if what Chris said is true. (sorry for the confusion) I could argue with you why I think abortion is right (and not murder) but it would land us nowhere. I do however want to say that I agree with the following paragraph completely. We need better education, better counseling, and better, more affordable healt…
/r/MensRights25/04/10 11:07 PM
2

Well ... Yeah. But I think our difference stems from what you call a moral standard. You said earlier that if laws should indicate an objective moral standard to which members of society should be held based on basic human rights that should not be violated by another I sort of cover that by saying how effective something is. If there were to be some action which would be against basic human rights, or against our moral compass, then not making it illegal would have an overall bad effect on soci…
/r/MensRights25/04/10 10:00 PM
1

However the legality of something does usually affect how prevalent it is hence legalizing everything is a wrong conclusion. If you were to get rid of speed limits people would drive a lot faster than they already do now. If driving under influence would be legal people would do it a lot more then they do now. This in turn would be detrimental to the society as a whole. In these cases, even if people already consistently disregard certain laws we are still better off with that law. If Chris' dat…
/r/MensRights25/04/10 09:35 PM
2

If there is something which is illegal now and if legalized would not change anything and only help people, then yes, whatever that something is it should be legalized. However the legality of something does usually affect how prevalent it is hence legalizing everything is a wrong conclusion.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 09:15 PM
7

He might resent you for it It is surgery for only aesthetic reasons, why don't you just give him some botox instead. Foreskin is not some useless appendix. (I am sure there are other posts explaining its function, but it basically comes down to this; it acts as a sleeve making movement easier and heightens pleasure) Though pleasure is subjective, no single person on this planet has had sex with both a circumcised and uncircumcised penis within a couple of weeks. Since people who get circumcised …
/r/MensRights21/04/10 03:42 PM
3

He's not saying that all women who identify themselves as feminists believe owning a penis makes you are a rapist. He is saying that the people who believe owning a penis makes you a rapist identify themselves as feminists. Two different statements.
/r/MensRights18/04/10 07:46 PM
2

Oh, I thought they meant that the guy was the boyfriend of the daughter. Excuse me.
/r/MensRights16/04/10 10:53 PM
-2

Boyfriend ?? It was a random trucker who was 26 years old. No boyfriend, he was a guy that paid for sex with a 13 year old. The actual article mentions no boyfriend.
/r/MensRights16/04/10 10:20 PM
30

Why is it that gay men and women seem so intent on dragging straight men into the whole gender roles victim mentality. Because unfortunately gender roles exist for men. A male kindergarten teacher? Weird. A male nurse? Failure. A man who has nerve-endings somewhere other than his dick? Gay. A man who likes intimacy? Gay. It's not really what this sub reddit is about, nor is it really a great concern for most straight men. A yes, mister normal is the only man that exists. Men should only drink be…
/r/MensRights11/04/10 04:59 PM
1

I'm pretty sure if men would have done this, the sex offender registry would have grown.
/r/MensRights10/04/10 01:28 PM
-1

Ah, missed that. Though it doesn't really matter. The issue at hand is that it is really easy to harass someone with fake complaints.
/r/MensRights05/04/10 02:19 PM
19

[Mensrights is] supposed to be a (say it with me kids) MENS FORUM. No, it isn't. Its supposed to be a subreddit about mensrights. Both women and men can care about mensrights. As a matter of fact, I think the point of this subreddit is to get both women and men to care about the rights of men. Since this subreddit is filled with complaints about how women don't respect the rights of men, I don't see what the problem is with encouraging women to involve themselves in mensrights.
/r/MensRights03/04/10 10:03 PM
6

I probably won't make myself popular, and I could pretend it was unintended, but I will be honest anyways; I do not mean that all Americans suck. Here in Europe, all we get to hear are the bad parts about Americans. It is pretty popular here to bash Americans. Whenever there is some crazy story about someone bombing an abortion clinic, religious fundamentalists, crazy gun nuts who design guns for kids, some woman wanting to be the fattest woman on the planet, citizens actively protesting against…
/r/MensRights29/03/10 01:22 PM
17

Wow. Normally when I read stories here I go "Ah well, this crap wouldn't happen in Belgium. We must be better than those fucked up Americans" (sorry guys, but some of your laws are fucked up) Unfortunately, I have been proven wrong.
/r/MensRights28/03/10 09:27 PM
9

Did you just reply to your own post ? There is an edit button...
/r/MensRights27/03/10 04:32 PM
5

What that woman wrote is basically "Men are pigs, and women are caring sensitive people" I saw this in an article before, and I thought it didn't make any sense. Firstly, what the fuck is a sexual persuit area, and why does its size imply that men are more obsessed with sex. You could argue that men are more into sex than women based on intuition and stereotyping, but to argue that a vague area somewhere being big corresponds with a higher sex drive will need some scientific backing. Correlation…
/r/MensRights25/03/10 06:40 PM
11

Its really easy to concoct a story of abuse if the only person who could possibly disprove it is dead.
/r/MensRights25/03/10 06:29 PM
9

One in six college women will suffer a sexual assault, Tarrant said, but three out of five women won't report it. I love this little thing here. Dragon attacks are a serious problem. 5 million people get attacked by dragons each year. Of those 5 million attacks, on average only 4 get reported. See ? HUGE PROBLEM ! 5 million people get attacked and none of them will report it. Two problems !!
/r/MensRights25/03/10 06:23 PM
2

No. We are not here to put men in charge of everything or keep men in charge. It's MensRights, not MensDominance. This is all about what rights men have in our society, not about who needs to be in charge of a relationship. To be honest, I don't give a shit how you organize your relationship. Do you want to be an equal couple ? Have fun. Do you want him to wear a gimp suit 24/7 ? Good luck with finding a partner. Do you think it is ok a woman can put a man in jail by just accusing him ? Now we c…
/r/MensRights20/03/10 10:58 PM
2

Interesting way of looking at it, and I completely agree. Women have the right to marry men, but us men don't ! I don't know why, but it sounds a bit funny.
/r/MensRights20/03/10 10:47 AM
4

Sorry, it is a language issue for me. In Dutch if you say "Homo" or "Homosexueel" they refer only to men, and lesbian only refers to the women. (and isn't gay informally known to refer to only gay men in english too ?)
/r/MensRights18/03/10 07:43 PM
3

Ofcourse it doesn't happen on purpose, it happens out of habit, or religious conviction. Babies do not consent to circumcision. The reason it happens is because society thinks it is ok. The fact that society thinks it is ok doesn't mean it is ok. Society once thought slavery, or oppressing women was ok. (and when I say society, I mean society. A hindrance for womens rights was also that some women were disrespectful towards other women who choose to have sex before they are married, or women who…
/r/MensRights18/03/10 06:28 PM
3

save the tatas Googled it, and now I am losing respect for humanity.
/r/MensRights18/03/10 06:03 PM
1

Besides the off chance that my sperm donation would make me responsible for child support, my main concern is yours as well. I don't want to enforce the view that men are not necessary, and that it is normal for some 35 year old woman who is to busy with her career to just get a child because that is the only way she can do it. I am not sure if you can choose what kind of people your sperm goes though. If I could tick a box saying my sperm shouldn't go to single people, but only to lesbian coupl…
/r/MensRights18/03/10 06:02 PM
-1

I don't think this is demeaning. I also don't like the title of the submission because it implies that the slogan is demeaning. How about next time, we leave out demeaning, or you specifically ask whether it is demeaning to spark a debate. (as has happened now)
/r/MensRights18/03/10 05:56 PM
1

What next ? Will it be discrimination if I say I have a penis and my gf has a vagina ?
/r/MensRights14/03/10 11:22 PM
1

Around once a day is good for me.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 07:10 PM
3

Is this a real advert though ? It seems sort of amateurish, so I don't feel comfortable using this as an example of all the media. If you need examples, all you need to do is watch some ads on tv though. Edit: nope, this thing was actually aired. Apparently I am to naive.
/r/MensRights09/03/10 10:22 PM
8

The scary thing is that the only reason why she was "caught" is because she was stupid and started talking about her crime. "caught" because this is far from over, appeals take time, she will probably get off with a slap on the wrist in 8 months at best. It makes you wonder how many people do this and then never confess. Its scary to think about it. Imagine some 40 year old woman thinking "I wonder how that boy is doing I falsely accused of rape. Ah well, that was 20 years ago, he probably forgo…
/r/MensRights09/03/10 08:08 PM
1

But this whole fiasco has nothing to do with her feminist views. She (probably) gains karma/modship in order to market companies/websites. We may not agree with her feminism, but the fact that she propagates her ideas in "circles of trust and different media" is not something that should be held against her. If that is something wrong, then I am guilty for posting in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/03/10 03:50 PM
5

It is irrelevant why she posted. If she makes a good point, it is not invalidated by her motivation. (and if she makes a bad point, it most likely has nothing to do with her motivation, since everybody wants to be popular)
/r/MensRights01/03/10 08:20 AM
10

The reason why this is here is because she is a feminist, and its wrong to pick on someone because of their beliefs. We are supposed to discuss the ideologies, not the people. If this were an MRA, there would be threads here right now discussing how the motivation of her posting doesn't invalidate her arguments.
/r/MensRights01/03/10 08:17 AM
2

Why does this matter ?
/r/MensRights28/02/10 11:46 PM
7

Though I don't agree with you, I do not wish to discuss this here, since this is the mensrights subreddit, not the "Lets rage at a feminist because she did something bad completely unrelated to gender politics." subreddit. This has nothing whatsoever to do with mensrights, and everything to do with laughing at someone elses misery because we don't agree with her. Edit: and the harassing I am talking about is people posting her name, pictures and other stuff. It is blatantly disrespectful. (and y…
/r/MensRights28/02/10 11:41 PM
6

Downvoted. All this is is harassing a woman, and I don't think we should play a part in it. Please don't try to defend your position when your topic title is "cry saydrah cry". I have personally argued with her, and when I showed my gf the "girls of reddit calender" it showed Saydrahs picture. I said, hey, I know her, she is annoying. But I don't think she deserves to be harassed like this, especially after all the work and effort she put into reddit.
/r/MensRights28/02/10 10:24 PM
3

My post on the issue was pretty well received. I basically think that she is a bitch, but the fact that he was depressed for a year might have strained the relationship.
/r/MensRights28/02/10 04:53 PM
3

That blog is amazing. I read one entry, then ten more, and now I find myself looking at my clock, thinking "wait, that can't be right" This person has alot of interesting viewpoints. On feminism and porn
/r/MensRights27/02/10 11:58 AM
2

I'm just not convinced enough that she thinks women being controlling is a bad thing. I am afraid that she genuinely supports women controlling their partners by using these sleazy tactics.
/r/MensRights18/02/10 06:39 PM
-3

A black man has raped a baby This accurately portrays a black man who is a pedophile and rapes babies. However, from this does not follow All black men rape babies. Because the earlier example referred to only one person and it wasn't an example of black people, but of black people who rape babies.
/r/MensRights18/02/10 06:32 PM
1

The article does a good job of revealing a woman's viewpoint towards men's contraception So, all females have superiority issues? He said "a woman", which means only one woman, not all women.
/r/MensRights18/02/10 06:29 PM
4

When the Fox guy and the woman said It's funny because it is unexpected. I was hoping the guy would say something like this Ah yes. it is unexpected because the norm would be the guy abusing the woman, since all guys are either abusers, or they are dumb and deserve to be abused. Edit: I was surprised Fox news gave airtime to this guy, but apparently it follows from their tradition of inviting two people each representing one side of the argument, and then have the their employee side with one an…
/r/MensRights14/02/10 08:33 PM
1

Just for the record, this doesn't show guilt or innocence in any way, all this shows is that saying you were abused is an easy way out of serious consequences. This is a bad thing because abuse is hard to prove now that the guy is dead, and abuse is such an emotional issue that it supersedes reasonable arguments. The fact that a lawyer can say "Oh, but she was abused" as an excuse is sad. How many times does someone have to beat you before you have a right to kill that person ? I hope there is n…
/r/MensRights14/02/10 08:01 PM
21

I would like to say something more about this, but I am busy punching my woman with one hand. (because thats all that Mens rights activists do)
/r/MensRights08/02/10 08:57 PM
2

I hate to be the devils advocate here, but the military isn't exactly a friendly environment for a woman. And what are you trying to say with this? Is it "women are psychologically unstable" ? Is it "women shouldn't serve in the military" ? Statistics themselves don't insinuate any prejudice, but the fact that you post this to the MensRights subreddit is puzzling. I don't think this belongs here or that it is helpful in any way.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 07:01 PM
7

I don't really like what this person wrote because there is nothing to back up his claims. Maybe he is right, but some of the points he makes have no backing at all Example: 99% of the U.S soldier deaths in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have been men. TRUE Its great that you say it is true, but why should I take your word for it ? It might be true, but I honestly wouldn't know. Men comprise 80 percent of completed suicides. True, yet there are many programs aimed to prevent women from committing…
/r/MensRights02/02/10 04:20 PM
14

It being the only option just forces men to start looting, and then the people handing out food packages say: "don't give to men, they are a bunch of robbers that will steal and illegally distribute food" But their circular reasoning works, because their circular reasoning works.
/r/MensRights01/02/10 04:57 PM
16

Hey guys, don't you get it ? This is the Haitian patriarchy oppressing the women, forcing them to be involved with food whereas men will survive on pillaging. Seriously though, if you think this is an example of the patriarchal society forcing women to fulfill gender roles you are stupid. Misogyny is when you regard the women as inferior, and in this case, men are automatically regarded as bad, and women as responsible/good/kind. Yes there is gender injustice, but it sure as hell isn't the poor …
/r/MensRights01/02/10 04:54 PM
10

I notice a very distinct lack of mentioning the name of the guy. It could be the family wishes not to have his name publicized and his myspace page gutted for some touching quotes.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 01:50 PM
3

You come in here and try to insult us, and you accuse me of calling women cunts. Then instead of talking to me while I try to politely engage in a discussion, you just downvote because you don't like me, and you found out that you completely misread (or neglected to read) my post. Classy...
/r/MensRights25/01/10 04:38 PM
1

Did you even read the op ? I never called women cunts, neither did I advocate it. I said clearly that calling a woman a cunt is a wrong thing to do. I posted this in order to start a discussion about swear words and their perceived implications, I did not start this thread to nag about women. I wrote: If someone would use them it would be considered rude. [..] (and rightly so) [Nobody] but bigots would find these words acceptable This shows quite obviously that I think using those swear words is…
/r/MensRights25/01/10 11:23 AM
3

In the Dutch language "Kut", which literally translates to "cunt" is one of the most widely used swear words. It is equatable to the barely offensive word shit. Its the kind of swear word my mom actually uses.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 10:13 AM
3

Really ? Hypothetical situation here; A random woman walks up to you in the street, kicks you in the balls and calls you an asshole. Wouldnt you at the very least call her a bitch ? Im not saying that swearing is a good thing, but depending on what situation you find yourself in, you might swear.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 09:49 AM
4

What are you trying to say ? Do you mean I talk a lot and have a bad taste in music ? Well I must respectfully disagree. Have you got anything to say that is on topic ?
/r/MensRights25/01/10 09:45 AM
5

I just read this gem: As a man: If you make someone angry, or if you are selfish, mean, or a jerk, you will be called names that have to do with your being selfish, mean, or a jerk, and not a name that degrades the very sex that you happened to be born into. I suppose she never heard someone call someone else a dick ? Which happens to be one of the most accepted curse words, as opposed to cunt, which even sailors avoid. If you have sex with more than one person in your entire lifetime, you will …
/r/MensRights24/01/10 01:50 PM
3

Yeah, it sucks ass that it is socially acceptable for someone to say that what you are doing isn't manly enough.
/r/MensRights20/01/10 02:28 PM
21

This is how deception prevents anyone from making responsible decisions for themselves and why those who are intentionally deceived cannot be held responsbile for those decisions – only the person who is being deceptive is responsible. I hate the whole PUA thing, but her definition of rape is way too wide. What if I had sex with someone and then a week later I find out that someone deals drugs. If I would have known this before I would not have had sex with that person. Is this rape then too ? R…
/r/MensRights16/01/10 11:31 PM
41

Whatever you do, keep track of it. Got 50 emails today ? Don't delete them. Got called multiple times at 2 in the morning? Save your phone bill. If it ever gets to the point where law enforcement has to protect you from her, you will need proof. Also, I will PM you some suggestions because she might read what I write here. I suggest everybody think twice about what they post since it will be read by her (and she could use said knowledge to her advantage)
/r/MensRights15/01/10 05:23 PM
2

a grown man NO MATTER HOW OLD, should be able to control his erections. That's like saying that a woman is not allowed to have PMS. If your husband is not doing anything wrong, he would not mind you staying with him while he is with the baby and getting some kind of help. Actually, the op is not doing anything wrong either, would that person only want to see her child under supervision? Would she not be offended by the distrust from her husband ?
/r/MensRights15/01/10 11:30 AM
5

Who designed the Eiffel tower? This one you should know though, its in the name :D But yeah, nobody remembers names of architects.
/r/MensRights10/01/10 04:35 PM
3

Really ? Are we really going to celebrate somebodies death ? I disapprove
/r/MensRights07/01/10 09:26 AM
6

A healthy relationship should have a healthy sex life too, and a lack of a sex life is a clear indicator something might be wrong. When you pass a law that requires you to have a sex life you are effectively forcing people to have sex. (actually, not people, men, since there is no legislation requiring women to have sex with men) One of the things feminism has taught us is that in a relationship it is not a requisite for the woman/wife to "give" sex to the man. I would like it if our gender got …
/r/MensRights07/01/10 09:07 AM
8

So now there is a knife and red marks on her neck. (aka holding or strangling) This reminds me of when I said in the other thread that we did not know enough to already judge Charlie Sheen or his wife. I said his jailing was justified as we didn't know whether he threatened her and she recanted her story as a result of that. If she would have genuinely been abused (which I highly doubt) then wouldn't she fear possible repercussions and recant her story because she is being abused ? It could be t…
/r/MensRights29/12/09 09:22 AM
0

I'm not trying to be an ass, I am saying that asking for advice from a random group of people is not a wise thing to do when it is legal advice you need. Lawyers their job description is basically help other people out who don't know the law. The person who replies saying they had a good or bad experience could very well live with laws that don't apply to you.
/r/MensRights28/12/09 06:51 PM
-11

I'm not sure if reddit has rules yet, but the following should be a reddit rule Reddit is not your personal lawyer.
/r/MensRights27/12/09 11:43 PM
2

Naturally they shouldnt be left together, and preferably they should be forcefully seperated. Jailtime sucks, and yes, the media/society will always assume guilt, which also sucks, but what do you suggest happens to a couple once one has accused the other of being abusive ?
/r/MensRights27/12/09 07:52 PM
2

I can't believe you got an upvote for this post.
/r/MensRights27/12/09 02:42 PM
1

If you had to prove guilt during DV cases, and assume innocence, then DV would not be stoppable. Imagine a woman who gets beaten by her husband. She files a claim. The police don't arrest the husband, because despite her bruises, there is no proof it was him doing it. Then the husband gets a court date. In the meanwhile, husband beats wife silly, and then coerces her into dropping the charges. I know it is sad that unwarranted arrests are the only way to succesfully prevent DV, and if you have a…
/r/MensRights27/12/09 02:40 PM
1

Wow, congrats for enforcing the stereotype that men must be the strong gender in the mensrights subreddit. I didn't think anybody would be this stupid. Also, bonuspoints for insulting both genders. (you may think she is stupid, but despite a strong case against the validity of her claim, it has yet to be disproven, if you wanna argue about this do it here.)
/r/MensRights26/12/09 01:26 PM
1

If she would have genuinely been abused (which I highly doubt) then wouldn't she fear possible repercussions and recant her story because she is being abused ? It could be that the liquid courage she drank made her "fess up" The fact that the case is still being pursued is perfectly justifiable from the police's point of view. I don't think that Charlie Sheen should be jailed in the meantime, or be found guilty in any way, but that doesn't change the fact that women who are being abused that do …
/r/MensRights26/12/09 01:23 PM
2

Just because she was drunk doesn't mean that she wasn't right. I'm not saying she is right, or he is, I am just saying we don't know. Thusfar all I know is that they both got a blood alcohol test, and its good that they both got it, not just Charlie Sheen. I've unfortunatly seen this happen before where a drunk bicyclist who wasn't wearing any reflective gear, or had any lights on the bike, crashed into a car that was getting out of its parking space. Only the driver got tested and not the bicyc…
/r/MensRights26/12/09 11:27 AM
16

‘What are you gonna do, Chris Brown me?’ Ah, I get it now, it is perfectly acceptable for her to hit a man, but a man can not hit back because hitting a woman is wrong. The fact that they kicked out the victim is wrong on so many levels. Edit: wow. Now she is denying it ever happened, despite there being a video of it. (according to youtube comments its around 1:08 )
/r/MensRights26/12/09 11:06 AM
-1

So if using female soldiers is too complicated because of the sex that the men and women might have, why not just have an all female military ?
/r/MensRights24/12/09 08:19 PM
0

I read that text too, and when I read that, I said "What the Fuck !" out loud. You had sex, and then after you had sex you found out it had negative consequences which is why its now rape. You can't revoke consent after you had sex. I know its not always black or white in real life, but when you convey your feelings to another person, and say yes, but mean no, how the fuck is that person supposed to get it ?
/r/MensRights24/12/09 08:16 PM
3

I want to watch, but I am not installing veoh (last time I tried, it assumed that when you uninstall it, it is ok to delete "my documents/my videos", goodbye every southpark and family guy episode ever.)
/r/MensRights20/12/09 07:45 PM
3

I have mixed feelings about this. At first I thought, good ! Why should the mother always cook and the father always work ? Why can't a girl be a pirate, or an astronaut. Etc etc. Mix up the 'gender roles' a bit. Though I was weary, afraid that feminists would only reverse one genders role and not the other. The I read the examples and I did not approve ... Example: Two ballerinas dancing: "No one wants to fight the patriarchy alone. Make friends." What does this teach us ? 1: there is a patriar…
/r/MensRights18/12/09 06:45 PM
1

There are some other FML's that show inequality too. Like here, and here
/r/MensRights10/12/09 06:22 PM
5

I can already hear the whiny voice of some MRA saying, “Then why can’t I hate women? They choose to act as they do!” Women have to deal with enforced femininity, and while a lot of the behaviors femininity entails do indeed suck, they aren’t chosen as freely as men’s behaviors are. And now I hear the whiny voice of some dude who doesn’t adhere to the NFL Masculinity Guidelines claiming that he has to suffer the opprobrium and violence of those who do. Well, duh. But again, it’s men who are the p…
/r/MensRights26/11/09 09:34 PM
4

I know, I expected to go to the comments and then people would write something along the lines of "You profess to hate 50% of the world, congratulations, you are a bitch", and I was hoping some of the feminists who supposedly fight for gender equality would denounce this hateful person.
/r/MensRights26/11/09 09:22 PM
1

x
/r/MensRights22/11/09 07:14 PM
2

This is just thesame as saying "X make better parents than Y" It also implies that "Y are worse parents" How about we just say "X, Y, and Z can all make good parents" and not judge people on the basis of which category they belong to.
/r/MensRights18/11/09 01:20 PM
9

That's 13% of all the calls they get. No longer can the existence of female sex offenders be scoffed away by saying "That's just one in a million of the cases". Now its more than one in ten cases, and its on the rise.
/r/MensRights09/11/09 09:34 AM
1

Boris Johnson does not need relevance.
/r/MensRights08/11/09 04:11 PM
6

Yes, some men hit women, and some men need to be restrained. We recognize that. But... some women lie, and we don't recognize that. Damn man, you made a pretty big post and I completely agree with everything you wrote.
/r/MensRights08/11/09 03:58 PM
-1

Damn that story is terrible. And to those that call BS on that story, I can personally attest to the powers of hypnosis. I can make my gf fall asleep in ten seconds (and make her come with one word :D )
/r/MensRights08/11/09 03:33 PM
1

If Oprah let him on and he turned out to be guilty, it would be very bad for Oprah. I'm gonna be devils advocate here; Why should it be bad for her ? Does a domestic violence charge reduce the mans singing power ? Is he guilty because he is accused ? If he turns out not to be guilty, will Oprah be in trouble for taking away an honest mans job?
/r/MensRights06/11/09 06:25 PM
1

For some reason I have a hard time imagining a guy pressing charges against his ex if she pushed him to the ground.
/r/MensRights06/11/09 06:21 PM
1

I would say that now they are the most equal. (seriously, the past suffering of women outweighs any injustice facing men now, though unfortunately for some this also means that current injustice is permissible) Doesn't change the fact that were not yet equal enough. Also, to say equality can be measure on one scale is a lie. Some parts of society are equal, others are in favour of men, and others are in favour of women.
/r/MensRights06/11/09 05:58 PM
4

This post is so wrong ... but I laughed.
/r/MensRights01/11/09 11:14 AM
16

I dont get it ... The woman confessed, she acknowledged that she did something wrong. She willfully sought harm onto an innocent man and in the process was waisting taxpayers their money and police work hours (which could have been used to for other cases) How is jailing someone who wants to harm an innocent person bad ?
/r/MensRights31/10/09 05:52 PM
10

Besides, I know it really, really pisses them off when somebody refuses to engage them, and I just like making them mad. Once you refuse to talk you have already lost. I do, however, despise MRAs, and with the way they treat women, they're barely even human, let alone men. Also, congrats, you now have managed to call certain people sub-humans on basis of their political opinion. I hate to invoke godwin, but this is basically as close as it gets. Their control freak belief that they are entitled …
/r/MensRights24/10/09 08:24 PM
8

People who make false sexual accusations and cry rape, or, as in your case, a serious sexual assault, leading to individuals being questioned by police and/or arrested and sometimes remanded in custody, may expect to receive immediate custodial sentences because these sort of allegations are all too easy to make and very difficult to refute. If only more judges were like this person.
/r/MensRights24/10/09 08:01 AM
2

Women represent about 60 percent of university students in Sweden, a pioneer in gender equality. I dont get it, how is this equal ? If it were 60% guys then there would be debates on what to do with the problem, but 60% girls is apparently a positive thing.
/r/MensRights16/10/09 08:17 AM
1

I do like that it shows women can and are sexist too.
/r/MensRights28/09/09 09:40 AM
46

If you see the word "feminazi" being used, and you take offense, you just may be one. Thats like calling a bunch of people assholes because they get offended if you call them an asshole. Circular reasoning at its best. I am a man, and I believe that calling people nazis wont help. The fact that I felt I needed to write that I am a man in order to fend of flaming says alot.
/r/MensRights19/09/09 10:38 PM
-1

I know and share your opinion, I just think that by claiming feminazis will auto downvote hence we should all unite against the feminazis is a pretty wrong thing to claim. I'm pretty sure that this is the kind of sentiment we should avoid. Isnt that the exact aspect of feminism that we dont like ? ("that" being that some feminists claim that you should support them no matter what because the alternative is an evil patriarchy) The whole support us or the other side wins is what we should avoid be…
/r/MensRights11/09/09 01:27 PM
0

"Feminazi crew" ? I'm ashamed of the op.
/r/MensRights11/09/09 12:28 PM
-8

It is a generalized statement dressed up to look like a fact which mocks that subreddit. You fail.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 12:05 AM
9

Thats nice, her idea of people concerned with mensrights is that they are all trolls and evil men who hate women. I like how she keeps going on about downmod brigades. You know what ? Please don't pretend we are stalking you to downmod you, we just see you make terrible posts and we vote accordingly. Found this gem from a mod there: Dragging the comments off topic would be a good example. If someone posts an article on how Current Event X is affecting women, taking over the entire comments page …
/r/MensRights09/09/09 11:28 PM
3

I dislike the whole idea of thinking a man has to be manly. I like being manly, but if a man wants to be more effeminate then I think we shouldnt judge that person because of it. I think that that is the equivalent of housewives in the 50's who were mean to other women who didnt wanna become housewife.
/r/MensRights11/07/09 07:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter