TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LooseIndication Archive

View 1 posts and 841 comments by LooseIndication on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

Purge week!LooseIndication/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:36 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Makeup is to look prettier. Tattos are to look uglier. ​ Men are ugly, women are pretty. A tattoed woman is as if she maked up looking like a scare or a disease.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 01:50 PM
1

Looksmaxing is always the number 1 or 2 reason people assume a man is perpetually single No. That's taken out of context, and wildly exaggerated by the incels and black pills. Looks matter, but less in men than in women, because each sex has different needs and is attracted to a different mix of traits. Personality is the most important thing on men. Looks in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:58 PM
1

Marriage involves the state, and the state always exploits and abuse men. The state makes and change the rules without consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:51 PM
1

No. Women pick alphas. The rest are betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:47 PM
2

Generally speaking, men want submissive women, but there is way more sexual variability among men in what they prefer Beta males prefer to be submissive, and are the ones attracted to dominant women. To be attracted to a dominant woman is to need her to act as a mother, and women have an instinctual repulsion towards those men. Those men are fundamentally broken, and that's why they are beta males.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:44 PM
1

Women are more needed when young, and men when older.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:36 PM
1

So how does this benefit "beta males"? Men who presumably wield no authority. Law gave unearned authority to beta males, like exclusive right to one woman, power to decide on the family members, power to manage the family's wealth, power to give permissions to travel, power to control who the daughters had sex with or married, and a lot of powers given by the law and religion. Disagree. I think it's a biological dictate reinforced by implicit social contracts. That's what I said. There are two p…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:32 PM
1

everything I already knew about men. Welcome to the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 03:12 PM
2

How so? There was two parts of it: One is nature: women are attracted to men with authority. Either the man has the authority, or the relationship doesn't works, because the woman breaks it apart. In consequence, non patriarchal relationships always end in failure. That's not a social contract. Laws and contracts are only necessary when they go against human nature. The socially imposed part, is the one where men are given privileges that they cannot win for themselves. For example, the natural …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 10:02 PM
1

So it's the teenagers fault that adult men prey on them? As much as they prey on those men. They would be equally impregnated by a boy of their own age, but they choose who to have sex with. To get pregnant has nothing to do with the age of the man. It is the consequence of not using anticonceptives.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 09:28 PM
1

"some" doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 09:25 PM
1

What used to be "patriarchy" ceased to exist decades ago. ​ It was mostly a social contract made for the benefit of undesirable men: the beta males. ​ Today's feminazi discourse about "patriarchy" is nothing but socialist hate speech.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 09:10 PM
2

No. A higher percentage of men would be attractive, but there still be choice and selection. And male attractiveness goes far beyond physical beauty.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 09:07 PM
1

Let's be honest, women do hit the wall around 40 or 50. As far as alphas are concerned, women hit the wall around 24. A woman older than 30 is worthless for LTR. A woman over 40 is on average, infertile. His natural role is to be a grand grandmother. What a woman has to offer for a relationship, is not his present state, but his 5/10 future years.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 08:23 PM
1

Also many women want an ltr Meanwhile they "want a LTR", the are having a lot of casual sex. The LTR is for undesirable betas, and the casual sex is for alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 12:31 AM
-2

Clock starts when you turn 18 (or whatever the age of majority is where you live). At 18, most women had be ridding the cock carousel for years. That clock is rust.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 12:28 AM
3

The only thing that should change, is that people should be told the truth, and not fantasies, wishful thinking, religion, wokeness, and indoctrination. That would not solve the problems for a lot of people, but would give to them the opportunity to make informed choices. OP title is wrong. People do not have to be told "how to live their lives". That's each one choice to make. What people needs to know are the truth. What they do with it, is up to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 12:23 AM
1

That's an AWALT answer
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 02:58 PM
1

Another piece of communist propaganda. The soviet union suffered hunger for his entire existence. Hundred of millions died of hunger. Different families were forced to share an small apartment, and apartments didn't had individual bathrooms, but communal bathrooms. If they had the "highest standard of living", why people escaped the socialist countries to the capitalist ones, but nobody from the capitalist nations escaped to the socialists? Socialists brag about how good is the life in Cuba, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 02:55 PM
1

Women are hardwired to share an alpha. Unconsciously, they don't think of "her boyfriend", but "our boyfriend". That's why preselection is so important. It means that the group approves "our boyfriend". Women are attracted to the man their friends are attracted. Women share the information about their own boyfriends. If it is good, they promote him. If bad, they badmouth him. If the friends criticize him, his value drops. If the alpha ask something, before answering, women look to each other, to…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 02:20 PM
1

In the primitive state, the 9 men without a wife, will kill the man with 10 of them. In the modern democratic state, the 9 men without a wife, will politically overwhelm the man with 10 On primitive societies, a man has 10 women, because he already killed other 9 men. Nobody is left to challenge him. On modern societies, millions of men remain incels, and do not recourse to violence, because low status induces depression and a fall in testosterone levels. That's an evolutionary adaptation to avo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 11:17 PM
1

Monogamy needs to be enforced, because it is unnatural. Nobody enforces eating food. That's unnecessary, because people doesn't need to be forced to eat food. Laws exist to oblige people to act against their instincts. Monogamy was created to distribute women "equally" between men. It gives beta males one wife, that they would not have if that woman were free to choose. When women are free to choose, you get 80% of women, pursuing 20% of men, and the rest of males loose. That's why governments a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 11:01 PM
1

You are only dumped if you deserve to be dumped. You complain because you want to do no effort, and been given a relationship by a top man.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 09:21 PM
1

Is up to you to demonstrate that you are not AWALT, if you pretend that you are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 09:18 PM
1

Only teenage girls can benefit from TRP, so they know the real choices and costs they pay. And most probably ignore and waste it anyways. Older women, specially post wall, cannot get any benefit from TRP. They will be much happier never hearing any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:51 PM
1

Over 40% of the fathers of babies born to 15-17 year olds are over the age of 21. So adult men are impregnating young girls Girls that choose to have sex with them. That's how humans function. Natural. Nothing strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 07:38 PM
2

Is not "a problem". Is a fact. Neither is a problem if "women make less money than men", or "women have to share the alphas". You call it "a problem", because that's the way YOU see the world: you think that other people are responsible for your problems, and it means that you lack agency. Your problems are exclusively yours. Nobody owes you anything, specially the other sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 07:33 PM
3

The only reason a man should prefer a virgin is that he is a virgin himself. You do not choose what a man wants. You have no voice, and no vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 10:30 AM
1

Preference for youth is an unfortunate slippery slope for men. No. It is an unfortunate slippery slope for you, who wasted your youth.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 10:29 AM
-2

We are things whose value, morality and worth is judged by how many dicks have been inside us. That’s what it means That judgment is absolutely humane. Quite the contrary of dehumanizing. Hurting your feelings is not dehumanizing. That's your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 10:24 AM
0

It’s not creepy It’s dehumanizing Pretending to force men into not wanting what men want, is creepy and dehumanizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 10:22 AM
0

Why would a man need a "low n" woman? Especially a man who isn't a "virgin" or "low n" himself? Why would a man need a "vagina" woman? Especially a man who isn't a "vagina" or "tits" himself?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 10:19 AM
4

This is textbook shaming tactics, and it will never work. All it does is to confirm another chapter of the RP manual, which says that women do exactly that. Men's instincts will never change. There is no shame into desiring virgins (and young ones). You can't shame LGBT today, so how do you expect to shame men for natural desires that make evolutionary sense. Pretending to coerce men into being ashamed for wanting virgins, is like pretending to coerce women into desiring incels. It is totally ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 10:15 AM
3

Women have far less time than men, because they lose fertility, and hit the wall, (even worse, society forces women to waste their best years). So, women have a biological need to move faster. They have no time to lose. Every year, they lose value. On the other side, men who can't forget a woman, are the men indoctrinated by the blue pill in thinking that there is only one soulmate they can love, and that their happiness is given by the woman's mythical love. They become powerless leeches. The t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 09:01 AM
1

Despite all your words, you still have no clue what is submissiveness, and it means that you life is miserable. You keep insisting that submission is made in exchange for money, and that's prostitution. All your argument does is saying that you are a gold digger who failed to gold digging.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 08:42 AM
1

This is the most toxic feminazi indoctrination
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 09:17 PM
-1

There is no necessity or reason for a wonan to be submissive if she is an equal earner, or earns more than her partner, or is the sole bread winner Submissiveness has nothing to do with money. You confuse submissiveness with servitude. A woman is submissive to an alpha, because she is aroused by him, not because he has money. Your concept of submissiveness reveal that you have a toxic gold digger mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 09:14 PM
1

Wow. Solipsism at his peak.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 09:10 PM
3

For marriage, women select men either richer, or with higher earning potential, so that makes obvious that married men have to be richer, but that doesn't means that "marriage made them richer", it means the richer men are more desired for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 08:58 PM
1

Women want men that are about an equal mix of alpha and beta qualities What you claim women "want" is not what women actually choice in the real world. Are the only men who you know that have sex with women pure alphas? Irrelevant. What counts is the quantity of women they get. The beauty of those women. The quality of treatment they get. The duration of desire. The men that marry post wall women? Irrelevant. The men cuckolded? Irrelevant. The men that get sex a pair of times, and are left by th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 04:42 AM
2

What matters is what works, and not at all what "should" work, or what you "want". women still give men much more sexual pleasure than they get. That's absolutely irrelevant. Women are on it for what women get. Not at all for what men get. An equally absurd argument is "men get 0% of the babies that women get", so women should XXX. Sex is a trade, where different persons give and get different things. Your argument is as ridiculous as claiming that supermarkets should approach clients, because s…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 04:20 AM
3

the very rich, and there are always exceptions to rules for them As the red pill knows, "women make rules for betas, and break rules for alphas". Always, on any culture. Excess of men doesn't make a difference, because humanity is designed to always have an excess of betas. Nature intends that only 10/20% of men are supposed to get most of the women. where women outnumber men (like technical universities, for instance), men end up having to play by women's dating rules. I think you meant the opp…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 12:56 PM
0

"presence" is a bullshit word, that doesn't means anything concrete, so it is pointless to argue about it. Every person talks about something different. No, men and women are definitely not attracted to the same things with the same priority and intensity. Men and women are different. Not equal. Also, it doesn't makes the distinction between a needy beta male, and an alpha male. They are both attracted to different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 12:46 PM
0

Exclusivity turns off women. But even worse, monogamy forces women to choose more unattractive men when the most attractive are taken. Across many generations, it multiplies unattractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 05:19 PM
4

But there isn’t always an excess of young women compared to young men now "now" doesn't matter. Evolution takes far more time than the age of civilization. Humans aren't very different than from neolithic times, apart from some loss of brain mass. And even in China, the richest men have harems, even when it is forbidden. This week the news was that Lai Xiaomin was sentenced to death, for having mistresses. But that's not even the reason. He fell out of favor of the local politicians (all of whic…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 04:35 PM
5

Archaeologist here: Archaeology is not anthropology, and your post is a pile of bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 12:41 PM
1

So it's not like women chose to be in harems, but rather that they had no real choice in the matter It doesn't matters. Excess of women is the natural state for humans, regardless of the causes, so humans evolved to naturally live in that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 12:39 PM
6

Neolithic societies still exist today, and the most common behaviors are: The main cause of death for males is fighting for women, (not in war), so there is always an excess of females over males. That's the natural state for humans. It is common to wage war against other tribe, kill the males, even the children, and take the women for sex. So the excess of women gets even larger. The alphas get most women, and not all women get a husband. Many practice prostitution. The youngest women get with …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 12:32 PM
1

All women are attracted to dark triad traits. And that's not pathological. It is just what women are attracted to. It doesn't means that all attractive men are psychopaths. Psychopaths are an evolutionary side effect of what women are attracted to. Women are also attracted to autistic traits in men, but that doesn't mean that autistic men are attractive. Women select men with dark triad and autistic traits, and that created a higher probability in men to become pathologically dark triad and auti…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 11:45 AM
5

Given that only a small percentage of men are meant to reproduce, what the rest does, has no effect on society. Sex dolls are just one form of masturbation. What I find evil and hypocritical, are feminazi groups who hate speech men who choose to use sex doll with the argument that "women are damaged". That is the same as if men complain that they are damaged by women's sexual choices. Feminazis pretend to be so inclusive, and share the interests of the LGBT people, but when men consider sex doll…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 06:18 AM
2

It matters because it is a fact. It is true. It affects life, and informs about the correct life choices. When you say that it "shouldn't matter", is because you come from a social justice warrior place, where you think that other people is responsible for your happiness, and everybody has to be guaranteed the same result. It just reveals that your mindset is the one of a victim. You think that if it "matters" you will be compensated.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 05:19 AM
-1

That's entirely your problem. Men are not responsible for your problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 05:04 AM
1

Also, lol at calling me socialist You are a socialist, because your arguments are socialist. Whatever you "believe" you are is irrelevant. You are repeating the socialist doctrine word for word. Like feminism, and the blue pill, you had been indoctrinated in socialism, so deeply that you don't even think of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 04:48 AM
9

There is no contradiction, because financial independence is a necessity of modern life, not a female trait that arouse men. A woman that cannot sustain herself is a legal risk for a man. It is an artificial problem created by society. It has nothing to do with what pleases men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 04:32 AM
1

Your fundamental error is your concept of fairness. If you enjoy another person company, enjoy it. You don't "deserve" anything else. He doesn't owe you anything else. "Fairness" is a covert contract. You deserve that person's company as long as you provide value. As long as you make he feel satisfaction, as he defines and experiences it, and not as you pretend or wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 06:45 AM
1

How come this isn’t talked about much? It is talked a lot. It's called "oneitis". But is not the same as an alpha widow, because men an women are not equal. Men and women are different. Are biologically different, psychologically different, and functionally different.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 06:28 AM
3

Women are attracted to married men, for evolutionary reasons, because those had demonstrated to be competent, and have social proof. It is exactly the same thing than feeling repulsion to incels. There are no "faults" either on the man or the woman. They are doing what nature designed them to do. The fault is on the blue pill lie about monogamy, which is inhumane, and is nothing but a social construct. Is not possible to have the majority of the women attracted to a small percentage of men, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 06:14 AM
1

Lol, Bill Gates got tons of help from his dad financially Not even a small percentage of the money everybody can get from a bank loan and investors. You had the same opportunities than Bill Gates, a middle class man, but you are vastly inferior than him at doing stuff useful to society. The difference between you and Bill Gates, is that you can't come with a good idea for an investment opportunity, and even if you had it, you are totally incompetent at providing the evidence that attracts invest…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 05:59 AM
2

It would be better for the losers. Bad for humanity. This is social engineering to make society pay the cost, so lazy losers don't have to work for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 12:03 AM
1

1.) Beyond increased STD risk, does sexual history/ n count really matter that much to you? If so, why? Women with high n-count are verifiable bad partners. 2.) Do you view your sexual history/n count the same way you view a woman’s or a potential partner’s? No. Not at all. 3.) Have you considered how easy it can be for a potential partner to lie about sexual history? Absolutely. I take for granted that a woman will lie. I don't even ask, and I don't need to ask, because the effects are so evide…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 11:46 PM
1

Ok, how does that make me wrong? Absolutely. First, it is false that most wealth is inherited. The richest man in the world were born mid class: Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, they started from nothing and created more wealth than entire countries. Also, "stumbling around a good idea" is great for society when it makes you rich. You get rich by giving stuff to people, that people value so much to give you his hard won money. Inherited wealth is still wealth won by parents who did great good …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 11:40 PM
0

LOL. Yes, but also women compare themselves only to alphas, and men with higher market value, so they always feel inadequate and unfairly treated. That's why feminists rant all day about getting CEO positions, free university, loan bailouts, and all kind of privileges. They feel that they are not good enough as the top of society, and pretend it to be unfair, and also the fault of "patriarchy". Also women complain just because they can get away with it. They know that it generally works, and why…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 08:15 AM
0

It's okay for men to make children and abandon them The Red Pill doesn't says that. That's a moral judgment. The red pill is amoral. It is descriptive. Men have the instinct to make as many babies as possible, and alpha males cannot support all the babies they can make. That's a fact. It has nothing to do with "being ok", or being "reprehensible". That's a moral layer added by other people over the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 07:17 AM
1

Because women are attracted to different things than men. Men and women are different. Not equal. Two persons may be equally hungry, but one wants a burger, and the other chocolate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 07:05 AM
0

That's a pointless question, because women are ruled by instinct. It cannot be socially engineered.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 07:00 AM
2

Every manly feature to which women are attracted to, is a feature which adults have respect to children. Adults are taller than children, older, have more resources, authority, wisdom, strength, status, intelligence. But women aren't attracted to just "older" guys. Women are attracted to alpha males, which make a small percentage of the population. So, it is wrong to say tat women are attracted to "older guys" when the vast majority of older guys are beta males. Also, to say that women "like" ce…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 06:52 AM
1

Lazy people get rich all the time. Wealth is largely about stumbling upon a good idea first and/or inheriting wealth these days. That's socialist hate speech
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 06:39 AM
1

In other words, you are a clueless incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 06:39 AM
0

Because you are superstitious.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 06:38 AM
1

Only a loser thinks that the road to richness is winning the lottery
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 06:36 AM
12

No. Men and women are fundamentally different, and there is not a "female bad boy", or a "male whore". To state that "they are similar genetically", or "they come from similar bloodlines" is absolutely ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 06:32 AM
1

And how is capitalism doing in the US exactly? The US is the richest it ever had been, and one of the richest nations in the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 07:49 PM
1

200 years ago women didn't choose. They were sold (dowry system still used in certain cultures) or taken by force. Ever seen the caveman dragging the woman back to the cave? Mmm, you think that 200 years ago we were living in caverns
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 07:36 PM
2

The lazy and dumb generally don't get rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 07:34 PM
0

be large and attractive If women only had chosen men for being large and attractive, today men would be as tall as a giraffe and pretty as a hentai cartoon. In reality, men are a bit taller than women, and uglier. And you should stop going to the black pill forums.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 07:31 PM
0

If women had control of breeding, they would breed for physical fitness and low inhibition, not for intelligence or empathy It takes an extreme unempathic dumb beta male to believe that it doesn't take intelligence and empathy to pick up a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 07:27 PM
5

Making the baby is the definition of superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 07:22 PM
1

Humans evaded evolution for a long time with marriages and social constructs And women evolved to feint marriage, social constructs and social norms, by cheating with alphas, and hiding their ovulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 07:21 PM
0

Alpha doesn't equate to money, but yes, an entire, very large, segment of beta males are being euthanized. ​ The feminist movement is an ethnic cleansing movement, because that's the female nature: to get rid of betas. ​ Same as the attraction to slim, and young girls. It cleans incompetent people from the gene pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 10:16 AM
1

Society is really evil creating late bloomers, so I understand when one man struggle, finds it unfair, and has a hard time coming out the well. ​ They had been deprived of the experience needed to learn essential aspects of life. ​ But I frequently think "you deserve it", when those same dudes refuse to learn when they get all the experience and lessons they miss, served to them in a plate, and they still think that they know better. ​ The sentence is "not guilty" until they make the choice of k…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 09:30 AM
1

A typical example is the church boy, who had been brainwashed into shame for any sexual desire towards a woman, and is scared to death from ever initiate a conversation with a woman on the street. ​ He's so traumatized, that he's scared to death for even saying "hello". He feels like some angry mob will materialize, or the police will arrest him. ​ He had been induced a type of post traumatic disorder, by the people who indoctrinated him into being a "nice boy". ​ That's a common case. What he b…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 08:30 PM
1

No I didn't built it. My grandgrandson sent me one from 2050
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 08:19 PM
1

Most divorces are initiated by women. Due to monkey branching dynamics, when a woman calls a divorce, the relationship had been broken for a long time. Whatever justification the woman makes at that point are just excuses and rationalizations, so if you ask a woman the causes for her divorce, her answer will be completely misleading. It is completely pointless to ask a woman the causes for her divorce. You will get zero information from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 08:18 PM
1

We are talking of different types of abuses here. I'm talking at abuse by indoctrination, whose objective is to annihilate the self esteem of the male child, and lower his perception of his own status.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 11:40 AM
1

Definitely yes, but is emotional intelligence, and that's not measured by IQ. The academia is so incompetent at emotional intelligence, that it cannot even measure it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/21 01:44 AM
5

A large part I've noticed is that both ''nice'' and being an ''asshole'' isn't particularly stringent ways of describing behaviour, or at least how it's translated into real-life actions. Yes. Most losers are autistic, and can't understand basic subtleties like tone, irony, emotion, so when they see another man "not being respectful" with a woman, they take it literally, and call him an "asshole", when he is just sharing the fun with the girl. What really happens is that those "nice" dudes had b…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/21 01:24 AM
1

If the man is living his best life and has a good relationship, how is he damaged? Oh, you are one of those people who didn't had it explained it to death on this forum, a million of times. Now I'm going to waste my time explaining it a million one times.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/21 01:14 AM
17

China understands this which is why they started the whole "left over women" thing No. It isn't a "chinese" thing. It is the same all around the world, but western culture tried to erase it for ideological reasons. In western culture, the "leftover women" are called "spinsters", or "cat crazy ladies". The leftover women on the Simpsons are Marge's sisters, Ms Krabappel, and so. Those characters are taken from real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/21 01:06 AM
60

Between 20 and 33, that is, until very recently, I ended up in this kind of no-man's land where I did not really understand Translation: she rode the cock carousel, until she hit the wall, and now blame men for her past choices. We did not manage to rewrite the rulebook of patriarchal sexuality, men still dominate the playing field and we have to play along Translation: She confuses the alpha minority with "all men", and refuses to take responsibility for her choices, using the hate speech of "t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/21 12:27 AM
2

People is feed the lie that love is a permanent status. That if a person switches to love you, that change is permanent, and when is not, it is the fault of the person that stops loving. That creates a fake entitlement of ownership over the people that is supposed to love you. Marriage used to be "until death us depart", unconditional. A total fabrication, completely out of reality. So when people marry, they think "Ok, I already own this person, now I can focus on something else", and stops mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/21 12:03 AM
1

Why is the slut low value independently of what the man thinks? Because the man that marries a slut is damaged, independently of what he thinks.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 11:51 PM
1

No but if we stop slut shaming women as a society they will likely become more promiscuous meaning there is a greater supply of sex for men without having to trade commitment. The OP pretension is that is the "shame" what lowers the value of the slut. The point is that the slut is objectively lower value, independently of any "shaming". Your point favors malicious social control, because you believe that you would benefit from it, by shaming women, so more of them become available for marriage. …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 11:47 PM
4

Women attempt more. That's a lie. What really happens is that men are more successful killing themselves, and those suicide attempts are counted only once. Instead women pretend to attempt suicide to get attention, and the same women make a lot of suicide "attempts", which are counted as different suicide attempts. But less women attempt suicide than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 11:33 PM
1

"girls mature faster" only means that women don't need to mature, because they are sexually desirable, just for being fertile, young and pretty. ​ Women demand different things from men, and that requires a lot more time. ​ The reality is that men are the ones required mature, and women don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 03:33 PM
1

"society" should be entirely removed from relationships. ​ Relationships are private.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 03:27 PM
1

So if you have sex and get dumped afterward it's 10,000 times more heartbreaking than if you'd never had sex or gotten involved with the person at all. That denies everything you said before
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 03:12 PM
1

Women of he upper classes are as promiscuous as any other. They just tend to make more use of contraceptives.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 02:52 PM
13

Again, the fallacy that men "shame" sluts, which is an attempt to shame men. ​ The value of a slut will not go up just because men stop "shaming" sluts. Sluts are inherently low value, independently of what a man thinks of her. ​ Of course men benefit from sluts. There is no contradiction between men benefiting from sluts, and sluts being worthless tor relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 02:42 PM
1

On the RP, it usually means that you have to go and physically met other people. ​ If you want a woman, you need a lot of experience interacting with women. Santa Claus will not gift you a woman for christmas.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 07:38 AM
0

Discrimination is subjective, so anybody can claim discrimination for any reason he wants. ​ For example, LGBT in Canadá managed to enforce in laws that criminalize not talking to gays the way they choose for you to talk. You go to jail at the mere caprice of a LGBT. ​ That's the same as a law making a crime for women that do not treat their rapist the way the rapist wants. ​ In the past, only royalty had the right to force you to talk to them the way they wanted. Now the LGBT got royal privileg…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 07:31 AM
2

Is possible that some lions are kept as pets. But still it is the worst idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 07:26 AM
1

No, I don't think I will. Then don't talk from ignorance
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 07:24 AM
2

It is NOT the academic definition. Academia has nothing to do here
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 07:23 AM
1

You are losing the context. OP point is "First comes sex, then maybe commitment" That's a fact of life. Without sex, women cannot love you. You cannot get commitment first. It doesn't works. Also, commitment is an illusion. A woman may be perfectly convinced that she loves a man, and in one second, she loses attraction, and is over, forever. It is an instinct. Is animal. Commitment doesn't exists for women. It is a male fantasy. Teaching to a boy to look for commitment first is toxic. It will ru…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 03:03 AM
1

The man seduces the woman. That's a skill. That doesn't means that he "should keep trying" after he fails to seduce a girl. That's a completely different thing. Women are not attracted to men on the same way men are attracted to women. A man doesn't "look for a woman interested", because that's passive, and passivity is degrading and beta. He approaches the woman, and starts the interaction, to make her feel desire. He may fail or succeed, but the man has the active role.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 02:44 AM
1

It is a definition. You can disagree, but you cannot change the definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 02:35 AM
1

Go ask a PUA trainer. He will tell you how many dudes are on that mindset. Real data, not your unfounded opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 02:34 AM
5

Simply tell her youve noticed a change and if she doesnt change she wont get your money NO. You do not start the fight without checking with a lawyer first, and protecting all your net worth from divorce rape. That only gives her the advantage of initiating her own measures. And women have all the advantages on this situation.
/r/askTRP13/01/21 02:24 AM
0

NO. After the sexual revolution, only the people competent at relationships reproduce. It means that in the future, more humans will be competent at relationships, and that will be a better world.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 10:24 PM
1

Being a stepdad means killing your own children, to benefit the lineage of a dude that is making other women pregnant, and making you pay the cost.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 10:19 PM
2

It is the man's work to make a woman desire him. Is not matter of finding a woman who "desires him physically", because that's a passive, feminine role.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 10:13 PM
0

Yes, is the most common cause for which a man needs to be redpilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 10:08 PM
3

That belief leads to 95% rejection rate
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 10:04 PM
7

High Value Men are the men that women actually have sex with. That's a definition. The FDS use a different definition, meanwhile pretending that it is the same. For FDS, HVM means an extreme beta male which without any logical reason, is also a man women can love. An unicorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 09:52 PM
1

Patrice O’Neal was worse than him, and slayed beauties everywhere. ​ That doesn't mean that is OK to stay fat, and it doesn't mean that anybody can achieve Patrice O’Neal levels of alphaness, but it proves that personality is the most important male trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 02:07 AM
1

I had seen fuck ugly men conquering the hottest women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:56 AM
1

No. game is not a myth, but there is a lot of misunderstanding on what it is and what works. ​ Most criticism against game come from losers who want a simple and fast solution that doesn't exists, with deep psychological wounds that game will not solve.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:54 AM
1

Basically, yes. Only men capable of seducing women get sex. ​ Seduction can be learnt, and not all men an learn it. ​ The 30 year old virgin that doesn't want to learn, will remain virgin, or at best, will be used as a beta buck by a post wall woman, but 20 year old women will not throw themselves at him, just because he's older.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:48 AM
1

A lot of female anger against "the patriarcy" is women reveling against beta male's rules. ​ Another huge lot of it is communist ideology disguised as "feminism", with the objective of serve communists, and doesn't care at all about female well being. ​ The third main cause of "the patriarchy" discourse, is that women love to complain, create drama, and play as victims, to take advantage of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:43 AM
1

The fuck are you talking about? Most men dont care if their wives outearn them Most men are socially retarded
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:33 AM
1

Men evolved to have sex with as many women as they can. That's why men aren't as picky as women. There is no cost of opportunity in making an extra baby. ​ But women can only make around one baby per year, so women pay a higher cost of opportunity, and have to select the best male as father. That's why women are pickier than men, and will always be. ​ Contrary to most animals, human females evolved to hide their fertility. The purpose of it is to collect resources from beta males, and get pregna…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:27 AM
1

Only a small percentage of men get most sex. That's a fact. ​ There is an exaggeration on some traits that make some men attractive to women, but that's only a misunderstanding of what makes alpha an alpha. ​ Women are only attracted to alphas, and those are a minority of the population. ​ Dating "average or above" means discarding 50% of the male population, and adding a small number of extra requirements, easily reduce that number well below 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:11 AM
1

An unattractive, but thin teenage woman can beat an older woman, even if she used to be prettier. ​ So she should seduce a rich male on his 30's.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:55 AM
0

, if you literally do simple basic research they literally say looks, money status all in that order. if you literally do simple basic research the RP says that alphaness overcomes looks, money and status.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:48 AM
1

The man's voice is his main seduction tool.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:44 AM
1

Men will always be disadvantaged, because biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:40 AM
1

“redpill believes X and X is dumb” when the post isn’t even about that subject All posts here are about the red pill. Otherwise, they are off topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:38 AM
6

U.S. population: 350 million/ 2 = 175 million males But you are counting babies, and almost 100% of babies have balding issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:28 AM
1

No relationship ends for minor issues. ​ Minor issues are excuses to end a relationship that has major issues. ​ The reason to argue "minor issues", is because people is to resentful and immature to be told the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:14 AM
7

Some prefer virgins cause they view the hymen through the lens of Christianity or symbolic purity. Bullshit. The chinese prefer virgins, and they are not christian. Preference for virginity is an universal value.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:03 AM
3

Sex is not basketball
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:01 AM
1

She's a woman, in most cultures, and for most of human history. You also confuse pedophilia with ephebophilia
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 11:59 PM
1

The problem is when they expect a hot, mentally stable, non-religious and normal libido woman to somehow still be a non-virgin past her early 20s. And that's why even beautiful woman past 23 are worthless for relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 11:49 PM
1

Also, losers, would prefer easy women, because they can't get anything else. ​ When a man says that he wants an easy woman, for relationship, is because he's incompetent at seducing a woman, so he wants the woman to make it easy. ​ That's a childish state. Not a man capable of leading a couple.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 11:44 PM
1

For pump and dump, whores are much better, because they know how to behave in bed. ​ For relationships, is the opposite. A woman can be taught, and her value is her trustworthiness. "Sexual experience" devalues a woman for relationship. ​ Now, a woman who "save herself", but meanwhile gets old, also loses value. She's also saving herself for a beta. Youthness cannot be saved for later.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 11:38 PM
1

How much sex those women had with each male? How much genuine desire? What happened to the control group? Who reproduced the results independently? ​ No answer? Then all of it is trash without any scientific support.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 11:39 PM
1

"Toxic masculinity" is hate speech. It does not exists. ​ The concept was created by a person without any degree in psychology or psychiatry, and was politically forced into the psychological association manual without any scientific evidence, and without any professional support. ​ It was created out of nothing. It's purely political, propagandistic, and comes from the extreme left. It is part of the hate speech of gender ideology, cancel culture, and critical race theory. ​ Completely ignore e…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 11:27 PM
1

Why the best women are with the worst men. LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:23 PM
6

Bullshit. ​ The first credit card, as known today was Diners Club, and everybody could own one. ​ The source of the lie is that credit is given to people with verifiable income, and most married women didn't worked, because they exploited their husbands, which were legally responsible for the credit card debt. ​ On the 70's, banks realized that wifes would spend their husband money if they allowed credit card extensions to family members. So they invented cards for the wife. ​ But that was not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 11:18 PM
2

FDS: 100 steps plan to get a clingy man newyearspurgeaccount: Why I only get clingy men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 11:08 PM
2

One of the best dogs, if they were not so drooling.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 07:04 PM
-1

No ​ On average, women turn sterile at 40, and what do they have to offer on the next 10 years? ​ The bottom women are the 35 year old. They have 10 years to offer, where they have a shitty body, and scarce chances of making a bay. ​ A 25 year old, has to offer 10 years until she reaches 35. ​ A 15 year old has to offer the best 10 years of any woman. ​ 40 years is the age at which women retire from the sexual market, and work on their grandgrandsons.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:32 PM
2

Tax is real slavery, but leftists favor taxes and oppose work freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:20 PM
2

Is not matter of fairness. Life is not fair. ​ Watch this: The zebra doesn't argue about fairness with the commensal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:33 PM
3

Everything you wrote is the irrelevant stuff, and that explains your problem. ​ You have no idea at all, about what is important. ​ You started by asking the number. Aside that it is a bad move, why would a woman want to give you her number. ​ At that point, she has to be interested in you. If you start by asking the number, then you did absolutely nothing to wake her interest. ​ You believe that women just look at you, and decide if they like you, and that's not how it works at all, unless you …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:20 PM
2

This is not a place to do pickup. This is not a place to make you feel good. ​ Stop complaining. Nobody cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:05 PM
1

On long term, yes. Nothing beats it. ​ On short term, there will be a lot of volatility. I'm not sure it is a good investment just today, because BTC is sky high. ​ But the BTC I saved this year multiplied by 5. Best profit ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 10:09 PM
1

That's a high opinion of men LMAO As tall as female aspirations
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 10:07 PM
1

None of them care for you at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 12:10 AM
0

You hate other people because you expect other people to fix your problems. ​ If your cousin's girlfriend is a whore, that's none of your problems. It makes you angry because you subscribe to fake, artificial moral norms, that humans don't follow, because they are fake. ​ You live in the matrix, and you are angry that the matrix is not real. You want it to be real. That's why you are here, and not on the RP. ​ What you want is not achievable. People on the purple pill are all self serving. They …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 12:07 AM
1

I think you're confusing "have sex with" with "have a mature loving relationship with" Men bring the maturity to the relationship. If you need "maturity", then either you are a woman, or immature yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 11:59 PM
1

The blue pill brainwash people into believing that anything that is not being Ned Flanders is bad and evil, so they call asshhole to any person standing for his perfectly legitimate interest. ​ That's part of it. ​ The other part is that, to gain power and extract emotional support, women tend to exaggerate and wildly misrepresent any harm done to them. ​ So, the more beta loser a nice boy is, the more atrocious he finds healthy dominant male behavior. ​ That makes 90% of the "asshole" stuff. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 12:03 AM
2

Also loser men which thing that their problems are the fault of society, and only society can fix them. They are trapped on a childish state where they lack agency, initiative, responsibility and expect the adults to solve their problems. Marx was the perfect example. He lived on his mom basement, from his mom's pension, never worked, and dreamed, all day, excuses and justifications to rob other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 11:52 PM
1

18 used to be the average age of marriage. Children do not marry. Your opinion is totally worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 08:33 PM
1

It is good that women are hypergamous. Otherwise, the species would degenerate into a bunch of crybaby losers complaining about hypergamy, and demanding socialism. ​ At the same time, women do not have the value that the blue pill fantasy assigns to idealized "non hypergamous pink unicorns that fart rainbows".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 08:28 PM
0

Per your definition, the word "children" is meaningless
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 08:20 PM
1

If you're going to bring government into it, why not use government to sponsor singles' clubs or something like that? Investing in healthy relationships instead of unhealthy ones? Or is that way too old-fashioned and conservative for today's people? If "single clubs" are that useful, valuable and needed, then you can start one and get rich, by doing something society demands. ​ If it is not a business, then: 1- It will not work. 2- Neither the state will make it work. 3- Society will get poorer,…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 05:36 PM
2

The main problem with "nice" boys, is that they lack initiative. They put the woman on the leading role, so they expect the woman to bring the fun. ​ The root cause is that the "nice" boy assumes himself in a lower status position.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 05:24 PM
-1

The blue pill is magical thinking
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 05:18 PM
3

So you’re saying I’m insecure cause I won’t date someone almost a decade younger than me that is barely an adult? yes
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 04:58 PM
0

bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 04:56 PM
1

18 are the prettiest, hotter women that exists. A man dating 18's is taking the best. Anything else is an excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 04:55 PM
0

Idk, eighteen year olds look like children to me. I’d rather date a 28 year old. I take it as an insecurity you have with 18F, and lack of maturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 04:04 AM
1

Alpha is a definition. Alphas are the men sexually successful with women. Nothing else. ​ For every other definition of alpha, you can find counter examples. ​ There are traits correlated with alphas, but no man turns alpha just by imitating those traits. This is not to discourage you, and I'm not saying that the list you wrote is wrong. ​ This forum is the wrong place to learn that. You better go to the RP. Here you will get bad advice, unfounded opinions, frequently malicious. ​ There is a dee…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 03:45 AM
1

I do not want to pay for other people's condoms or anything for other people. ​ So don't tell me that the alternative is paying for his welfare. Neither I want to pay for their welfare. ​ Liberty comes with responsibility. If you ruin your life you should be the only one paying the price.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 03:12 AM
2

28F cannot compete with 18F
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 03:04 AM
1

We're getting off topic and I don't really know anything about this issue, but that just doesn't sound right to me. The highest HDI countries are Norway, Ireland, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Iceland, Germany... all countries which have capitalist economies, but with government social programs as well. Yes, it's a common myth that Western Europe and Scandinavia are some sort of leftist socialist utopias, I realize they have significant free-market capitalist economies... but it's silly to claim that …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 02:52 AM
1

You are taking it out of context, and making a dumb argument. I will not waste my time with you. You are blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 02:08 AM
1

Who mentioned sexual slavery or coercion? Do you understand the meaning of the word "enforced"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 02:07 AM
2

My experiences are completely opposite of TRP "Your experiences" have zero value to me. I don't even know if you are male/female/gay/autistic/child/ancient. I don't care who you are. You don't matter. I state and believe that women are attracted to men. You can argue that you are a lesbian. That makes your opinion irrelevant, because I don't care about lesbians. If you aren't smart enough to realize that, then talking to you is a waste of time. Your experiences are your own personal life, and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 02:05 AM
1

You don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 01:59 AM
1

I think borderline is too kind of a word for what they discuss over there. Most women adore that. There is no abuse implied. ​ You judge it like you judge gay people. What you think is bad, gays enjoy. ​ That is advised there, because women enjoy it. Of course, not all women, but most do. That's why kinky Fifty Shades of Grey was one of the most successful movies, and women left their seats totally wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 01:58 AM
2

nothing short of forced genetic engineering is going to change that. Why change it? Millions of years of evolution made it, that way, for a reason. ​ It is dangerously hubristic to mess with something that is not understood, and is chaotically complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 04:21 PM
1

"the reason why women make different choices about different individuals. At first glance it seems like it's really obvious to me, as a woman: that there is no uniform reason among women." That's bullshit N°1. Alphas ave success with the majority of women, and betas get failure with the majority of women. That proves that the majority of women are attracted to the same. You can point to rare exceptions, but that's irrelevant statistical noise. There have been global studies asking thousands of w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 04:03 PM
4

My post seeks to better understand your position and ask: 1) why do you believe what you believe? and 2) what kind of evidence could theoretically dethrone the answer to (1 )? I believe what I believe, because it works. If you want me to change my beliefs, tell me what works better, and if it really works, then I will change my beliefs. ​ What I want is lots of sex, so tell me how to get more sex, and if you cannot do it, then you are a liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 03:58 PM
4

A lot of evidence made me question my beliefs. This evidence: ​ If I practice it, and I get success, it reinforces my beliefs. ​ If I practice it, and my results get worse, I question that belief. ​ So, if you want a RP to change his beliefs, tell to that man how to get a lot of sex, and if it works, then you are right. ​ No sex? Then you are full of bullshit. ​ See? TRP is experimentally based. That's why you can't beat it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 03:44 PM
1

No, hypocrisy is to preach what you don't practice No. That's not the meaning of hypocrisy. Read the dictionary. To tell that I want myself to have an high n-count, and also I want women with low n-count, is honesty. Quite the opposite of hypocrisy. I'm an hypocrite when a woman asks me if I think low on women with high n-count, and I tell them that "It doesn't matters". I do that because otherwise I would not get sex. I'm not an hypocrite when I say that I want a woman with low n-count. That's …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 03:39 PM
1

The Russian make laws abolishing the family as soon as they made the communist revolution. And by the way, Romania was part of the Soviet Union. It caused a catastrophe, and forced the URSS to undo their reforms, because the state is utterly incompetent at anything, and totally failed to take care of children. For the URSS to undo their ideology, the situation has to be really awful. The soviets didn't cared when millions died after the agricultural reforms. The soviet Union suffered hunger for …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 03:25 PM
0

If I don't monkey branch, I'm not responsible for other women monkey branching. That's a strawman: first pretending that TRP blames you for "other women", and then "debunking" it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 03:19 PM
1

So you want to live in ancapistan? The "charity only, no government services" model hasn't really proven to be successful anywhere. To the contrary. The enormous entire evidence shows that as countries get closer to ANCAP, they get better. For example, the index of economic freedom is perfectly correlated with wealth, and Human Development Index. The more liberal a country, the better, and the more socialist, the worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 03:18 PM
2

Well let me tell you as a 0N asexual woman if I ever will have sex it will be with a 0N man. The Red Pill is about heterosexual people. You, rainbow people, stop annoying us with your problems. Your problems are none of our business. We totally DGAF about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 03:14 PM
1

do you know how disability works? You are mentally disabled.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 03:12 PM
2

Exactly. You don't care if that man has 1000 n-count. If you cared about "equality", you would choose to be attracted to male virgins, or incels. But you know that a male with a low n-count is a loser. You want a male capable of rising his n-count to the sky, because that's a competent man. Hypocrisy is to demand that men get attracted to what hurts men: women with high n-count, when women would never choose the contrary: to be attracted to incels. Men and women want different things. Are attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 03:11 PM
4

Your problem is that on any case, you believe that the solution to your problems is "to rely" on other people, no matter if men or women. ​ Expecting other people to solve your problems is childish an immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 03:01 PM
2

There is zero hypocrisy. Men and women value different things. Men don't have tits, and want tits. That's not hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 06:28 PM
10

men and women are supposed to feel genuine love for each other No. That's ideology, and ideology is the cause of "heated and vitriolic" spite. ​ Humans are not idealized angelic beings which "are supposed" to follow your ideology. ​ The Red Pill is not to hate women. It is to understand women, and not hate them for what they are not. ​ The cause of hating women is the conflict between your ideology and reality. Women are not what you had been told they are. ​ The Ned Flanders get irate when they…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 05:27 PM
1

To recognize a high n-count woman, spin a lot of plates. You will learn
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 05:17 PM
0

You are maliciously muddling things. Women breathe. Is is not "your fault". It is not "your sex" fault. But It does not justify going in life not taking in account that women breathe. Women monkey branch. That's not an ethical judgment. It is a fact of life. You don't "take blame" for monkey branching, because is not "a game of blame taking". It is not that "women are evil" for monkey branching. Women simply monkey branch, and a man has to be aware of it. The reason for which you are purposely m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 05:12 PM
1

Then why does welfare exist, why do homeless shelters exist, why do some countries provide free mental healthcare, why do we have mental institutions, why do PSA ads and anti-suicide campaigns exist, etc? Ok. If you support it, pay it by yourself. Don't force me to pay for it with my taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 05:04 PM
1

Countries in europe already provide money for a sex worker for disabled people That's wrong. Why the state decide to spend people's money on prostitutes? If the citizen wants to spend it on prostitutes, he's free to decide on what to spend his money. If he does not wants, the state is committing a crime by taking his money with taxes, and spending his money out of his will. It is the same as if I put my hands on your pocket, take your money, buy cardboard, and I give all the cardboard to you. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 05:01 PM
1

Women make rules for betas, and break rules for alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 06:31 PM
1

Is false that "women have intrinsic value". ​ YOUNG, FERTILE women have intrinsic value, for a short time. ​ Women lose their intrinsic value with age, and most women totally waste it. ​ Men do not have any intrinsic value, or have little. Men get to value what men make themselves achieve.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 06:28 PM
1

Basic economy teaches that if a large portion of women sell nudes, the price of nudes goes bottom underground
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 06:21 PM
4

This is kind of a silly take IMO. It is society's obligation to solve problems if a significant amount of people start experiencing them That's your opinion. You do not dictate what are "society obligations".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 06:16 PM
3

Men do not represent "their sex". Men represent themselves. ​ Men do not need to answer to any accusation against "their sex". ​ Case closed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 06:14 PM
8

How many you had sex with? 0 How many you married? 0 How many you crave and love? 0
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 06:12 PM
1

NEVER ​ There is nothing good obtained by "bringing it up" ​ I simply don't get into relationships with high n-count women. ​ A high n-count woman is for pump and dump, or a FWB ​ A low n-count is for LTR. ​ There is a place for both. Both have something to offer. ​ There is no point in asking a woman for his n-count, because she will lie and/or it would lead to hurt feelings. No outcome is positive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 07:22 PM
1

What it means is that women do not like needy men. "Emotional men" means "needy". ​ But it is necessary to use emotions to arouse a woman. A man without emotions can't arouse a woman. ​ The confusion comes from a problem with English language, which is incompetent, by using the same words for different concepts. ​ There are different emotions. Some are good, and some are bad. ​ The correct way to talk is: women do not like men with low value emotions, and are aroused by men with high value emoti…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 07:00 PM
1

TRP explains how women are, not what women "have" to accept ​ TRP explains to men which women are high value, and what women are low value ​ What is "beneficial" for women is your problem, not a RP concern ​ To a man, useful knowledge is "high n count are for pump and dump", "low n-count are potentially for LTR" ​ It would be awful if women started following "the male imperative", and stopped being whores. It would make much harder to get casual sex. A smart, educated man, knows that only a low …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 06:50 PM
5

Socialism in a phrase.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 06:09 PM
9

If you cannot seduce a woman, it is your fault. ​ It is not other people's obligation to solve your problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 06:07 PM
11

No. You do not care about "inequality". You only care about yourself, and you want to change the entire society only to fit your own personal needs. ​ That's dictatorial. most women are on there to receive free validation That's your problem, not their problem. the ones that are on there to meet, are mostly interested in sex with handsome men Again, your problem, not their problem. women that are in it to date are often left disappointed because of their poor choice in men That's their problem, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 06:04 PM
1

No. It was a communist policy. The communist tried to abolish the family, and make children to be supported by the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 05:57 PM
2

Beta males can't discern, and beta males make most of the population. ​ But it does not takes many women to start to tell them apart. Sluts are way more skillful dealing with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 02:37 PM
1

No. Women don't settle until they confirm that their attractiveness is lost. ​ For as long as a woman believes that she is attractive, she thinks that is a better man somewhere waiting for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 02:31 PM
3

That was tried by the Soviet Union immediately after the communist revolution, and was catastrophic. Millions of children were abandoned on the streets. ​ Alpha men hold dozens of women, and their children were called the "bezprizorni", abandoned children on the streets, which were supposed to be taken care by the state. ​ The children which didn't' died of hunger, turned into criminals.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 02:23 PM
3

Women are open to casual sex. The difference is that women are more selective. ​ A less selective woman is a whore, and a whore is the worst choice to have a family, because she will cuckold his mate. ​ Sexual preferences evolved, because they are better than the alternatives. ​ If you try to social engineer sexual preferences, you may succeed in short term, but on long term, all people influenced by you would be deleted from the gene pool. ​ That's exactly what is happening with the legion of i…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 02:11 PM
-1

The 30 year old man is much better with a 20 year old woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 01:59 PM
2

Women create the double standard by being attracted to attractive men, which have high n-count because they are attractive. ​ If women were so worried about "double standards", it would be super easy for women to adopt the male standard, and reject all the alphas. ​ A woman complaining about double standard, has a double moral, where she is pretending that men have to adopt female standards. That's inherently evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 07:31 PM
2

Marriage doesn't exists anymore. LTR is the highest level of relationship achievable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 07:16 PM
6

Women that do X always claim to not do X, specially when nobody asked. I only remember how the person made me feel That's how most women compare men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 07:10 PM
1

Most men are so brainwashed by the blue pill and the cancel culture, that they think that perfectly sane masculine behavior is being an asshole. ​ That makes 90% of the myth. ​ The rest 10% is because women are attracted to assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/20 05:30 PM
1

Women seen to have lost the entire concept of "beauty standard" ​ There is nothing uglier on a woman than tattoos, and they are so common today.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/20 05:26 PM
-3

Charisma. No bitching. No boring personality. Loyalty. If I feel something "rare" you do not have the benefit of the doubt, and not a chance of explaining it. Obedience. I have a project, you jump in. This is not a democracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/20 04:34 PM
1

If you want to be millionaire, write a book on how to manipulate women into sex. One that really works.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 07:39 PM
1

No. women are admired for their beauty only. Nobody cares for the ugly woman who nailed an alpha or Jeff Bezos. ​ If a high status man marries an ugly woman, he's seen as a loser. Nobody says that the woman is desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 07:36 PM
0

The answer is lust
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 07:28 PM
1

The concept of chad is an incel concept. ​ Men are alpha or beta, not "chads" and "uglies". ​ Incels believe that alphas are only defined by their looks, so they confuse "alpha" with "chad" ​ It depends on what definition of chad you use. ​ The answer is that good looking men can be betas, and aphas are not necessarily good looking. ​ That's why it does not makes sense to use the incel slang.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 07:25 PM
1

Only your mommy "likes you" just because you exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 01:49 PM
1

Women are attracted to men with high n-count, so women are responsible for the "double standard". But when women complain about double standard, they pretend that it is created only by men, and women do not have any responsibility. ​ If women wanted "equality", women could simply choose to be attracted to virgin men, and choose incels. But women are the ones who despise incels, so women are responsible for the "double standard". Women complaining about double standards, what are really asking is…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 01:47 PM
-1

Men are attracted to youth and beauty. Not "lifestyle". ​ Lifestyles has absolutely nothing to do with the wall. ​ The wall is at 24, not 30. At 24, the young looks are gone. Many women are still fuckable between 24/28, but cannot compete with 18/24, even if they take perfect care of themselves. ​ After 24, the alphas are gone, forever, except for some occasional pump and dump. ​ Between 24/28, women start suspecting that something is not like the blue pill promised, but they still hold hopes th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 04:11 AM
12

You don't want a woman. You want a mommy that breastfeeds you and also gives you sex. ​ First, women don't "give" sex. Women want to be the receivers, not the givers. ​ No woman fucks out of generosity. ​ But most of all, women are disgusted at the idea of caring you like a son. Women want you to be their daddy, not another children to care. ​ You are emotionally broken, trapped in an infantile state, and your post is just a cry for compassion. Your self esteem is underground. ​ You need therapy…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 03:59 AM
2

China adopted liberal market reforms, and is growing rapidly. ​ China has less welfare burden, because socialism accustomed people to live in extreme poverty, without any right to complain. ​ Because China has a population 5 times larger than USA, and USA is getting crushed by public spending, it is falling behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 03:39 AM
1

You presented no evidence. No investigator can get fund to go and pick up a statistically significant sample of women. He can only rely on self reported questionnaires, which are unverifiable, and totally worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 03:33 AM
2

Your friend is irrelevant. Your league, is what the men who want you decide. You cannot decide your own league, because you cannot control men's choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 03:29 AM
1

That’s statistically untrue. Your data includes 18 year old "children", so it is 2 decades obsolete, and from a single country. Most newborn TODAY have single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 03:27 AM
1

No amount of "work" makes a woman prettier or younger. ​ No amount of "work" makes a man less attracted to other women. ​ Most pumped and dumped women are ugly. ​ Some are pretty, but not trustwrothy. ​ Most women are not charismatic
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 01:08 PM
3

The blue pill "worked" for the older generations. ​ Worked in appearance, because the women still despised their husbands, and still cheated. ​ Women married young, married more, and divorce was scarcer. They didn't had contraceptives, and society punished people following their instincts too much. ​ Those rules no more apply, but the blue pill men still believe to live in that world, and that's why they fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:56 PM
2

So unattractive men are not being eliminated from the gene pool Yes, they are, and that's a good thing. ​ It does not matters if unattractive men make babies, what matters is the ratio to attractive men. ​ If attractive men make 2 babies for each unattractive one, after some generations, the unattractive DNA is deleted form the gene pool. ​ Most mothers today are single mother, and that means that most babies are alpha sons.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:45 PM
8

I would say this is not true, because the league in question is judged from the male point of view. The male point of view is often times under-estimating what woman's league really is. Men decide what league a woman belongs, and women decide what league a man belongs, because the consumer sets the price by consuming. ​ Nobody can decide his own league.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:37 PM
1

There is no "science" because it is unethical, and politically incorrect to investigate it, and also any politically incorrect conclusion is censored, because it may ruin the investigator career. PUAs make the only valid experiments, and the evidence is overwhelming. You don't need to be a cuttlefish to study and understand cuttlefish, so don't bark at me with the word "science". I know more science that you will ever do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:31 PM
1

Is your duty, not mine, to base your arguments. Also, Cuba also privatized some things, and it is still a communist government, so your entire argument is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:27 PM
1

Incel is exactly a virginity status. By the way, you are blocked
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:25 PM
5

There is plenty of evidence. ​ Any remaining doubt? Hear this woman which works as a dating agent, telling it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6ONHDmDD8s ​ Be a regular at a night club, and you will see always a small number of alphas taking the women. ​ It is the experience of most men in school: the alphas take most of the women. ​ Join a PUA group, and read the experiences of most men there. ​ Go to any dating application/website: you will see that a small number of men get all the dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:11 PM
0

And instead of becoming an incel (although, if they existed at the time, I may have identified as one) Only virgins can be "incels". No single mom can ever "become an incel".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 01:17 PM
-2

You are wasting your time blaming men for deadbeat dads. ​ Men are competitors. The beatdead dad is hated by other men, because the deadbeat dad won. He took the prize. ​ The single mom is a woman any other man lost. ​ The son's of the deadbeat dad are curse words: bastard, and son of a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 01:14 PM
2

A woman may be an angel, fucked an alpha, and was rejected. ​ Now she is an alpha widow. The worst thing for a man, no matter if she didn't had any fault. ​ She will never be able to love a man that's less than the fantasy she holds on her head about the alpha. ​ There are plenty of good hearted women that turn the life of a good man into hell, just because he's more beta than the alpha she had in the past. ​ An alpha widow feels resent and spite for the beta man. Is not her fault. She may be to…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 01:10 PM
2

I'm a liberal atheist, who fucked lots of women. ​ The reason I know that high n-count is bad on women, is because I have tons of first hand experience with all types of women. All the whores are whores with zero respect for men. ​ I used to think the opposite, and it is experience what taught me the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 12:59 PM
1

She can, but is malicious
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 12:56 PM
1

Hypocrisy is to pretend that there is an hypocrisy. ​ Women don't give to a man the same thing that a man gives to a woman, so you are the hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 12:55 PM
3

High n-count raise the value of a man, and reduces the woman's value. ​ Any increment does that. There is not a specific number. ​ The "cause" is not an excuse. The damage is done. If you want to buy a car, and you are offered a crashed car, it is ruined. The causes don't matter. It is ruined. ​ You don't buy the car because it was used to transport angels
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 12:53 PM
1

I assure you, it can. Your word is totally worthless. Show me the paper
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 12:41 PM
3

For women, there is no love without sexual desire. ​ But that doesn't means that women can't have sex without love. For example prostitutes have sex all the time, and they don't love their clients. ​ Sex is necessary, but not enough to create a bond. Can this play a more important role in judging prospective partners than using N-counts, and does it inter-relate? Men care for their own interest. Any woman with high n-count is bad for that man. Is objectively bad. ​ You cannot change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 12:39 PM
0

That's astrology. Superstition
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 12:33 PM
1

Many women can orgasm from having their breast massaged, so they are sexual. ​ What are attractive are perky breasts. They signal that the woman is young and fertile. ​ Female breasts are supposed to be reduced to flat hanging triangles around 20, where they lose their natural attractiveness. In modern societies, breasts are artificially kept looking young by the use of bras.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 04:41 PM
1

Men being “forced” to ask women out is pretty dated. We’ve progress as a society but I do believe women want to keep the old benefits as there is less pressure and no fear of rejection. Nobody "forces" men do do any approach. When a man does not approach a woman, everybody else gains. ​ He leaves more women for the other men, and women don't need to waste their time with that loser. ​ Men compete with each other. Nobody cares if a competitor doesn't compete.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 04:36 PM
1

No, because wombs are a limited resource. ​ What is scarce has higher value. ​ Men are easy to get, so men have low value. ​ The "type" of all women are the same alphas. If you are not alpha, you are not the "type" of any woman. ​ It does not exist a soul mate. You are not "the type" that some woman is looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 04:29 PM
0

Men gain value by having sex, and women lose value for having sex. ​ That's because: -Women get pregnant. (and anticonceptives don't matter) -Women can only bond with sex. So having sex with multiple males destroys their bonding ability.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 04:10 PM
2

I have definitely been shamed for being a virgin until I was 25. I was shamed by the guy who was my first kiss, in fact. He told me I was "probably asexual" for not having had sex yet, despite me telling him I was religious. He also seemed to think it implied I was "weird" or crazy. That's a manipulatory tactic. He didn't cared at all about your virginity. All he did was to reframe it to get in your pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 04:06 PM
0

And no, it's not innate. If it were, it would be cross-cultural, and it isn't. It is cross-cultural. Pick up forums have men from all the world, and is the same on North America, Europe, Latin America and Asia
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 04:04 PM
3

Being a virgin woman should be a stronger predictor of immaturity than being a virgin man. (A virgin girl has failed to achieve a milestone which most girls of her age have already achieved) Quite the contrary. That's why fucked is a curse word. ​ A fucked woman is totally fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 04:02 PM
3

A male virgin is an incompetent man, and incompetent men are bad company.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 04:00 PM
1

Actually, long term, the prettiest women are the ones who more waste their potential. ​ Look at Tomi Lahren. She's already on the wall, bitter and desperate. ​ She was a 10 when younger, but the caliber of men she enjoyed, no more care about anything that isn't a 10. And she can't accept that she will never have those men again. ​ Those women still think that they are 10, so they can't settle with less, and all it does is to make them to waste whatever they have left. Lahren could still nail a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 03:57 PM
1

That's a scam. No such paper can be downloaded
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 03:42 PM
1

Every year, your shortage in "quality" marriage material men gets shorter and shorter.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 12:04 PM
1

Feminazi hate speech reduces MRA to "if women have any problem, then men don't have any" and "Any male problem is invalidated by the slightest female problem". ​ So this entire post is hate speech.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:58 AM
1

they couldn't hold a conversation Most women can't hold a conversation, or turn it into a shit test gallery, or is all about themselves. ​ The ones fun to be around are gold.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:53 AM
0

*intelligence doesn't means having a degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:49 AM
1

Charisma. ​ Charisma towards me, not towards other men. ​ Seducing a woman takes a lot of work, and after sex, you really get tired, and only remember all the work that the woman meant. You do not really want to spend your life doing "work". ​ If is not fun and seamless to be around you, you are not worth more time. ​ Teenage girls tend to be the most charismatic, because they are unworried about manipulating the man. Older women learn very fast to be trouble. ​ In part is because most men are b…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:48 AM
2

Just look at ads like the infamous gillete ad, and all the movies where all male characters are replaced by women, and they do not just make the women look good, but purposely make men look bad. ​ It is near to impossible to find an ad or movie that doesn't practice misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:38 AM
1

Red Pill knowledge is the only empirical source, so it is the closest thing (available) to scientific knowledge about women in relationships. ​ It is unethical for any academic source to do relevant investigation. And it is also politically incorrect to even dare to go against the mainstream blue pill and feminazi propaganda. Any investigator risks his funding and employment by being objective. That invalidates any academic source.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:33 AM
8

Common law marriage is an atrocity. It imposes a contract between people who didn't agreed to sign a contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:31 AM
1

Why are you wasting my time like this? You are not even citing a wikipedia page (which chan be edited by anyone). You are kinking a personal blog in wikipedia
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:26 AM
1

Apart from tiny tax-havens like Monaco, where in the world do you get freedom from taxes? That's a retarded question. The highest the taxing, the poorest a country becomes. The lower, the richest.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:25 AM
2

You really think bras help to keep breasts in shape? The only purpose of bras is to protect breast form gravity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:23 AM
0

Unless a woman is super ugly, she has more men throwing at herself than she can deal with. So she doesn't needs to approach any man at all. ​ A woman picking up a man is totally low value. ​ But lets not confusing "approaching" with "picking up". Most women way to "try" a man is to get close, or to start some casual conversation, but still expecting men to seduce the woman. They still expect the man to do the pick up. ​ So your wording "approach" is too vague. If by approach you mean "pick up", …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:18 AM
32

Sugar Apps Will learned about sugar apps, and he decided to give it a try. He copies/pasted his detailed profile from Tinder to Sugar Dating. Only adding how much he was making and his family's wealth. He expected to get a bit more matches. Instead, he got 100+matches. With girls messaging him to meet up, he thought it was insane! All his "dating gurus" had taught him some BS that would take him years to "get good." He noticed that one of the girls was the EXACT GIRL from Bumble he liked. He wen…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:09 AM
0

So you trust Hitler to tell you what he does and why? You lack arguments, and recourse to fallacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 10:41 PM
0

Hitler didn't "prosecuted socialists". That's an empty claim you cannot prove. And the societ Union, and China did worse mass murderers than Hitler.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 10:40 PM
1

Freedom means liberty, freedom from taxes (respect for property), and respect for life. That's what it means on the "french" model, and on the "British" model
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 10:39 PM
1

The Nazis extensively privatized industries. But even so, setting aside the fact they weren't socialist, and took great pains to purge any socialist elements from their party and society, you contradict your premise here because they had a market economy. Lies. The nazis didn't made a single privatization. ​ The nazis were the "national socialist party of the workers"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 10:36 PM
1

The USSR under the NEP, Yugoslavia, and the PRC following Deng Xiaoping's reform all feature market economies After socialism failed, they made liberal reforms, and became better. It proves that socialism doesn't works, and liberalism works. The Nordic model, rooted in social democracy is a form as socialism, that features market economy Bullshit. The "nordic model" is an extreme form of liberal capitalism. The nordic countries rank on top places on the Index of Economic liberty, Facility for do…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 10:35 PM
0

/s? Hitler discourse in April, 1922, blaming jews for being capitalists: "The Jews have shown real genius in profiting by politics. This capitalistic people, which was brought into existence by the unscrupulous exploitation of men, has understood how to get the leadership of the Fourth Estate into its own hands; [...]. On the Right the Jew does his best to encourage all the evils there are to such an extent that the man of the people, poor devil, will be exasperated as much as possible— greed of…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 04:36 PM
1

Hitler stated that jews owned most of the capital. That's why Hitler hated jews. It was part of hating capitalism. Because Hitler was a socialist, he believed that there is a limited amount of wealth to split and share. That's a central foundation of the socialist ideology: the scarcity of limited resources. So the natural conclusion was for the national Socialists, that the jews had to be killed, so the wealth was only shared by the germans. Socialists always killed gays, because socialists bel…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 04:30 PM
1

Liberalism is not property-related Read John Locke.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 04:25 PM
1

There is no laissez-faire without property. Liberalism purpose is to free people from government. "Laissez-faire" means "allow people to govern themselves". The opposite of laissez-faire is to control people. To reduce them to servitude, which is socialism. If you freely decide to work to make furniture, it is not enough to "laissez-faire" you to choose your work. If at the end of your work, somebody robs the furniture, there is no "laissez-faire". To be able to work, you need the guarantee that…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 04:23 PM
1

Personal taste is also a tool of evolution. There is no line between personal taste and evolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 04:16 PM
1

A non hypergamous woman is autistic, or has something broken. ​ Hypergamy is necessary. It assures that the next generation has the best DNA.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 04:14 PM
2

The Flying Spaghetti Monster?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 04:11 PM
1

There is no such thing as male/female nature That's unscientific, neomarxist propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 04:09 PM
1

A single mother is 100% guaranteed to cuckold a man. ​ The purpose of a man is to raise his own children, not to be the beta cuckold of the alpha who fucked that woman, and is still fucking the best women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 04:07 PM
1

The "nice boys" are not natural. They had been brainwashed to believe that they have to act that way. It's like a religion, you cannot convince them out of it, because that's what they were taught since children. ​ The nicest, the most beta, because they conform to social norms, which means that they are followers. They will never be able to lead a woman to the future. They don't even have a plan. They rest on you to decide, and that's what makes you feel incomplete and disappointed about thinki…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 04:05 PM
1

Even today, to make muscles, it is not enough to lift weights, but also is necessary to have a very good diet. Most men cannot get muscular bodies even by lifting weights, because they don't have a clue on what diet to consume.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:52 PM
1

Those paints represented the richest classes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:35 PM
2

Women always worked a lot, until the past century, where the middle class emerged, and women were no more required to work. ​ Women non working was a luxury of the XX century, never seen before. ​ The Venus of Mylo in no way represented the average woman. Statues were made for the richest of the richest, and those statues represented teenagers only. At 20 any woman had their breasts reduced to a flat hanging triangle, because bras had not been invented yet. So the breasts on the statues were of …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:30 PM
1

Is impossible to tell, because there are no recordings with statistical value. ​ All that remain from those times are some pictures and statues, but those, in no way represent the common people. ​ Until the 19 century, most human beings, almost all, including the nobility, suffered extreme poverty, and everybody had a high chance of dying from hunger.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:25 PM
1

No. Under socialism, the people own the property, not the state. People owning the property is liberalism. Exactly the opposite of socialism
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:22 PM
1

Read more
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:21 PM
1

There is no socialist state with a market economy, unless is a black market. Central planing is unavoidable in socialism, because socialism is based on banning private property. So only the state can manage the property. The nazis tried to manage important industries from the state, but leaving the former owner of the factories as a manager, subordinated to the state. It also failed, like any other form of socialism.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:21 PM
0

The nazi camps mostly kiiled jews, for being capitalists and gays, because all socialists always killed gays
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:17 PM
0

They did though. They literally killed anyone who was a socialist. As their first order of business. “First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out…” That's an unfounded lie
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 10:17 AM
0

They literally killed anyone who was socialist. That’s a great indicator that they weren’t socialist. That's a lie
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 10:17 AM
2

A beta buck is not necessarily married or in a relationship, and is not necessarily spending money on women. ​ Beta buck is the negotiation strategy of beta males: since they cannot arouse attraction on women, they resource to "compensate" with other things, like attention, comfort, money, obedience, virtue signalling... ​ The phrase originated to describe men who dated women, spend money on them, gave attention, and comforted those women when they complained about how badly the alphas treated t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 10:09 AM
1

Well some of them give up on sex. Can't imagine how but that seems to be a fairly common part of it. "Some" is not justification for a generalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:56 AM
1

Fantasy genre, but themes like Destiny and Fate and Bloodlines and Prophesy are often central to the story Irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:55 AM
1

Just because you claim something, it doesn't make it true. ​ Left and right doesn't mean anything concrete. What is left on one country is right in another. ​ The only clear distinction is between liberalism and socialism. ​ Under liberalism, people owns his property. Under socialism, the state owns the property. Nazism only left the property of factories nominally under their owners, but the owners had no control on their property. The state decided anything. That's perfect socialism. Ownership…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:52 AM
1

It really isn't. Socialism is largely an extension of liberal beliefs in the equality of men. Both are rooted in Enlightenment thought. No. Liberalism is the respect for individual life, liberty and property. ​ Socialism does not respects life, liberty or property. For socialism, the individual is below the state, so his life is expendable. Socialists do not respect liberty, because they need to micromanage the life of every individual. And, of course, property does not exists under socialism. ​…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:46 AM
1

That's why nationalism is usually referred to as "third position" (read Alexander Duguin tesis about Juan Domingo Perón and the new russian geopolitical scheme) which pretends to set them apart of western and eastern capitalist models. The third position is nothing but socialism, and socialism always advance more socialism.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:41 AM
1

Yes but they didn’t execute anyone just for being a socialist. Neither did the nazis
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:40 AM
1

No. The nazis were socialists, like a socialist is a socialist. ​ You pretend to reduce nazism to violence, when the nazis were less violent than the communists. ​ The communist killed more of their own people, for longer time. ​ Nazis executed communists, not socialists, because communists were internationalists (imperial socialists), meanwhile the nazis were nationalist socialists. ​ The socialist doctrine is based on the flawed myth of scarcity. Socialists believe that there is a limited cake…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:34 AM
4

being single is not always a reflection of their mating value Yes, it is. ​ Being single is the consequence of not being able to seduce a woman. ​ Not being able to seduce a woman is being romantically worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:18 AM
0

Just another case of feminazis turning against women when actual women don't follow the feminazi script.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:16 AM
1

Men reach peak value between 30/40. Women between 16/24. ​ Any 30+ man having trouble at that age doesn't has a problem due to his age, but the garbage on his mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 06:41 AM
8

Which is really weird because I've seen VERY liberal people call anyone who isn't as liberal as them a Alt Right Nazi...as if to suggest they are a hate group. Liberalism is the opposite of socialism. ​ That "liberal" people are actually socialists, and the nazis were also socialists, so they are accusing real liberals of being socialists like themselves. ​ It can't get more absurd that that, and it proves that they have no clue about what they are or what they are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 06:38 AM
12

MGTOW men do not "give up on dating". MGTOW still want sex. ​ MGTTOW give up on LTR, marriage, transferring resources to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 06:34 AM
5

What enrages incels is that women are not the lie that beta males invented. ​ That's the fault of beta males.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 06:31 AM
1

Sex is a prerequisite for a woman to love a man, so is is impossible for a woman to love first. ​ A woman cannot "look for a relationship" first. ​ The man has to prove his value as a stallion, which is to be a seducer, and also an alpha male, before the woman has a clue on how much she wants him for LTR. ​ The only way to prove to be a seducer, is to actually seduce the woman into sex. ​ If the man compromises itself into a relationship, or just wants a relationship, it means that the man is lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 06:12 AM
-1

Harry Potter is really badly written as a male character. ​ He's born as a kind of secretly "royal" person. That's a feminine view of the world: To "be" instead of "becoming". ​ Potter was who he was for things out of his control, like a woman is born pretty or ugly. ​ Potter never plans his life. Things just happen to him. That's a feminine view of the world. Other people decide, other people tell him what is going to happen. The broad plan has already been planned by adults long time ago, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 05:59 AM
1

They are not "considered 10/10 by the RP". ​ It is clear that they are beta males. ​ You confuse TRP with the black pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 05:43 AM
1

Women are hardwired to reject men that look for relationship first. ​ It is biological. You can't change it. You cannot educate a woman out of it. ​ Is not that "women are evil". ​ Looking for relationship first is a beta male fantasy. It is totally artificial. Reality doesn't works at all like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 08:17 AM
2

You first demean men as playing "victims", and then proceed to play victim by ignoring that men suicide is still an order of magnitude higher than women's. ​ 1 growing 70% is 1.7, meanwhile 10 growing 25% is 12.5%. Much larger than the "70%". All you are doing is muddling the argument. ​ You also ignore than the suicide rate for women is made of "attempts", repeatedly counting multiple attempts by the same woman as if those were problems of different women. Men suicide in larger rates, and also …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 07:08 AM
1

Could you be more pedantic? I’ve been AND continue to be attracted to him... as in, it’s ongoing You are offended by your own words. ​ You are the one who talked in past tense. ​ Women who brag about their romantic life to anonymous strangers on internet, are always lying. ​ You are here because you can't stand your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 12:39 AM
1

Why do people waste so much time trying to breath? ​ Answer: because that's your purpose as a living being.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 12:29 AM
1

A broad, vague and undefined question like this one doesn't deserve arguing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 12:28 AM
3

All self respecting men want only the company of enjoyable women, including sex. The rest of women are only for pump and dump. ​ But is not the duty of men to "enjoy" you. It is 100%% YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to be enjoyable.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 12:23 AM
1

Every time you see a woman giving advice, that woman is a total failure at LTR. ​ Women lack the empathy to care about men's needs, and as consequence they can't be bothered to learn. ​ Men actually need to approach a woman, and seduce her, so men need to care and understand women. That's why the Red Pill exists at all. ​ Women take a passive role, and that's why there is not an equivalent red pill for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 02:21 PM
6

Too coward to talk to a woman, but thinking they can beat the alphas with violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 02:15 PM
3

Today, ISIS is a pile of dead bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 02:13 PM
2

Antifa rioters are another example. Antifa rioters are tools. Puppets. It takes a loser to be a follower. ​ Puppets never get women, no matter what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 02:12 PM
1

Maybe in the future we will use genetic engineering or enhace the capabilities of cosmetic surgery so that a higher % of men can fall within the ideal range of what women are actually attracted to. No. Cosmetic surgery cannot fix personality. ​ And is not the problem, because men and women descend from the same parents, so they are equal on the looks bar, . The pool of men and women come from the same DNA, and yet more men remain virgin and sex deprived than women. ​ Women are not attracted towa…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 02:05 PM
11

Nobody cares. Women don't care about betas. As far as women care, betas do not even deserve to be acknowledged of their existence. ​ Neither men care about betas, because betas are competitors. The worse they get, the better for the alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 02:01 PM
1

And there are assertive, charismatic men who are actually very gentle and let their wives be in charge of everything at home. My husband is a pretty even mixture of what RPers would consider alpha AND beta traits, interests and tendencies, and amazingly, I’ve been sexually attracted to him for many years!! been... in the past
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 01:58 PM
0

Women start their dating life, as teenagers, with their highest value they will ever have. They are on high demand, so most women don't need to care about learning to be valuable. ​ Women just believe that if they have sex, they are owed a relationship and attention, and don't know how to gain a man's appreciation. ​ So after sex, when they catch interest on that man, they feel entitled to the male's attention, and feel upset when they don't get it. ​ There is nothing worse than believing to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 01:55 PM
0

Any man with experience dating, has seen first hand the AF/BB female behavior, and has found himself on both sides. It is not restricted to single mothers or ugly women. To the contrary, the prettier the woman, the more beta bucks she exploits. ​ That experience is universal, superior to any "study", and totally out of reach of any "study".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 02:36 AM
0

That’s why I suspect a lot trpers have very negative opinions about older women, because a lot of the low quality ones tend to congregate on dating apps Totally wrong. TRP is older than dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 02:32 AM
1

It is the man who makes the woman horny. You do not understand that and that's why you fail at women. You have to seduce a woman, or you will be waiting forever, and get lucky if you get the leftovers of a 35 year old no more wanted by any other man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 09:57 PM
1

No. You don't play cards against a million other men. It is a totally different game when your worst chances are 1 in 50 than 1 in a million.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 09:54 PM
2

idk the actual rarity matters a lot here. Is it a lottery or, like, a dice you can roll over and over? It is thermonuclear naivety to expect that a rare pink unicorn woman stays single waiting for you. Those women get snatched at 18 by one of the ton of alphas they cross.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 09:52 PM
4

The only possible equality, is equality of opportunity. Never equality of results. ​ Equality of results is unequal because it unfairly punishes the meritorious. ​ Equality can only be the equality of the equals. On the exact same conditions, two people deserve to be treated equally. ​ Men and women are not equal at all. men and women have different tastes, different preferences, different needs, and value different things. Men and women are judged by different rules, so it is impossible, unethi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 05:02 AM
-1

Man if I suggested something I really enjoyed and the guy said no I would take that as a mismatch in interests. Do never look for "matching interests". When women like a man, they change all their interests. And if you have the same "interests", you will bore the woman, because she can't discover anything new in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 04:43 AM
12

Yea I hear you , do you think there are exceptions? You can't plan your life for exceptions. It's like planning to win the lottery "I will not save for retirement. I will win the lottery at 70"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 04:41 AM
1

what if she actually likes you but needed a bit more time ? It doesn't happens. If she likes you, she wants sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 04:40 AM
1

So wait status doesn't make you an alpha? No. Alphas tend to raise in status, but status by itself does not guarantees alphaness. ​ Some alphas don't have any status. There are broken drug addicts that get lots of women, and men with ultra high status that are total betas. ​ What makes a man alpha are the results: he gets lot of sex. Women want him. ​ Leonardo Di Caprio has the same status than Brad Pitt, but Di Caprio is alpha and Brad Pitt is beta. ​ There is a correlation between status and a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 04:34 AM
4

There is no push for men to act like women. You live outside of the world. There is a total push for men to act like women. Even to use female clothes and carry small girl purses. Look this: https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/fashion-in-motion-men-in-skirts Schools all around the world had been taken by cultural marxism, who teaches that sex is "a social construct", and pushes men to act like women. Whoever dares to criticize it is censored, cancelled and deleted from facebook, twitter, youtube and …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 04:15 AM
1

You are trying to convince women to be logical. That's a waste of time. ​ By stating that "shit tests are bad", you are trying to logically convince, and thus negotiating attraction. ​ Your argument is irrelevant. Women cannot stop doing shit tests, because they are not conscious of them. ​ Also, shit tests are not bad. They evolved for a reason. ​ A woman shit testing you is testing your quality as male. If you do not pass, you need to mature, and you are a bad choice. ​ When you do not pass a …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 04:06 AM
1

The Red Pill is exclusively heterosexual business.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 04:00 AM
3

When a woman likes a man, it does not stop her from throwing shit tests. ​ The man has to be aware, and know how to deal with it. That's how women are complicated. ​ When a woman is uncertain about her attraction to a man, the man has to raise her attraction, and that's complicated. ​ So, women are complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:59 AM
0

Redpill is totally based on experience. ​ TRP philosophy is an attempt to explain the universal experience of men. ​ TRP is based on results, which is the result of the experiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:52 AM
4

Our entire society is built off viewing femininity as inferior. We all suffer from it. I update you to 2020: ​ Our entire society is built off viewing femininity as superior. We all suffer from it. Our entire society is built off viewing masculinity as inferior. We all suffer from it. ​ Your discourse belongs to a different reality, 75 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:48 AM
1

Being "emotionally expressive", for the blue pill, means being weak, feminine, a victim. Men that are "emotionally expressive" that way, are doomed to fail. ​ But you cannot seduce a woman by being emotionally inexpressive, because it takes emotions to arouse emotions. Seduction is about the right emotions. ​ A man has positive emotions, and is in control of those emotions. Women are controlled by emotions. That's why women are attracted to men that can control their emotions. Controlling emotio…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:44 AM
1

No. there are many things that create attraction in women, and the most powerful is the skill of driving female emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:39 AM
1

we need to stop following the lizard brain No. A woman's reward are feelings. If you take away the feelings, there is no reward, and it gets totally worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:27 AM
1

You misunderstand shit tests. ​ Shit tests are not conscious and logical. ​ You are trying to negotiate, and desire cannot be negotiated. ​ You do not pass shit tests by being mean. You pass shit tests when you show that you are not negatively affected, and you do not lose control of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:24 AM
1

A man is an individual with XY chromosomes. ​ “boys are born, while men are made” It means that men don't mature and do not have market value until they work for it and achieve success. ​ The phrase is directed at men who believe in the soul mate myth. ​ The blue pill teaches that men do not have to work to be sexually desirable, and it is only matter of luck to find "the right" woman, which is the woman that will love him. ​ That is in contra position to the female reality of reaching their max…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:17 AM
1

Not sure what you mean. Both are linked. The sexual market place is similar to how capitalism functions. Both emphasize freedom and motivation. Genders are more likely to date people that are successful. You want to enslave women because you are worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:05 AM
0

Given the nature of capitalism and the modern sexual market place, most men won't measure up to be matable for women Capitalism has absolutely nothing do with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 02:47 AM
0

K dude Lemme know when you grow a vagina. I’ll be interested to hear your perspective on how women experience sex and love. Your n-count is astronomical, and your capacity of pair bonding is gone forever. ​ I didn't mean you. You don't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 07:49 AM
1

There is a natural ratio of incels, like it does on any animal species, but in humans it is also artificially boosted by the blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 05:23 AM
1

I don't know anyone in real life who prefers younger women. Then you are a liar and /or you had been lied.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 05:18 AM
-3

Is not the role of a man to "do chores".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 05:18 AM
1

You are confusing alphas with betas. ​ Married beta males are absolutely miserable. They are isolated and despised by the woman. ​ Bachelor alphas are the happiest.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 02:45 AM
1

The same woman, they day she can get pregnant, is 10X more attractive than the rest of the month. ​ It should be pheromones.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 02:42 AM
1

Women have to be independent for legal reasons, but that doesn't make them more attractive at all. ​ A mom caring for the house, and taking care of the children is more pleasant to a man, but a legal risk that most men cannot afford. ​ The only advantage of an independent woman, is that because she is occupied sustaining herself, the man has it easier having sex with other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 02:38 AM
1

The blue pill is a path to failure. ​ It only worked (badly) in the past, because beta males reduced women to sexual slavitude, but you can't turn back the clock, unless you enslave women again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 02:32 AM
1

Women are biologically attracted to alphas, so polygyny is the only way a free society can be. ​ Women also can have a cohort of beta bucks kissing their ass, and working as resource drones, but that's it. ​ You can't change biology, because you can't change what women want.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 02:30 AM
1

Young men are not supposed to marry, because they have no resources, career, status or experience handling women or leading. ​ That's why women are attracted to older men, and men to younger women. ​ The best path for a young woman is to mate with an older alpha. If she waits, she loses her value, and when she wants to marry, the alphas are interested on younger women only, or not interested at all in LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 02:27 AM
1

Not at all. ​ Men and women are different, want different things. Value different things. ​ Men and women cannot be valued by the same scale, so it is absurd to pretend to match their "attractiveness". ​ Human beings are not monogamous. Humans are polygynous. ​ Women are not attracted to a man "on the same level". Women are attracted to the best men available. Men best than the average, and as high as possible. ​ Men are attracted to a large pool of women. So women do not need to be "the best". …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 02:16 AM
8

It means that soulmates do not exist. ​ It means that you can't own a person. ​ It means that women are hypergamous. ​ It means that there is no point in investing long term in a woman. ​ It means that women live in the moment. ​ It means that there is no collateral. No insurance. No stock. ​ Women give a service, not a good.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 02:03 AM
-2

No. You can't. You can pretend. You can control some of your behaviors, but you can't control your feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:58 AM
2

Nothing fixes a high n-count. ​ There are many other factors that count, but they do not compensate the n-count.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:56 AM
-1

Older men can be pompous, boring and unfit Younger men can be pompous, boring and unfit ​ And also have lower status.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:55 AM
0

All men prefer younger women. It has nothing to do with past experiences. It is biological.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:54 AM
1

An essential aspect of seduction, is to avoid qualifying yourself. Learn about qualification.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:52 AM
1

And after every mating, or generation, your genome gets diluted by half Not at all. It is far more complex than what can be discussed here. Learn about it, and discuss it on a genetic forum. You are babbling nonsense, and you are beyond any hope of understanding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:50 AM
1

DNA doesn't compete. It only competes in the sense of natural selection That's what it means. DNA competes by having gens that favors successful reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:48 AM
1

It's called socialism. A couple gets welfare payment when they go unemployed, and when they get a new job, the state employee, tells them "we can ignore that you got a job, and you still get paid", for a commission, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:45 AM
-1

Women can't separate sexual satisfaction from feelings. It is the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:40 AM
6

Yes. Is "oneitis". A beta male pandemic
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 01:36 AM
1

The more children you have, the more of your genes get passed in a single generation. But they still get watered down the same after 10 generations. By your math, even if you had 5 children and 97% of your genes passed on in a single generation, that would half after each generation the same. With your absurd logic, humans would disappear after some generations, and would be replaced by flying crabs. You do not understand the simplest things about evolution. Successful gens multiply across gener…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 10:00 AM
3

That...doesn't work like this Go read an introductory book on probability, and stop demonstrating your ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 09:46 AM
6

Attraction is not negotiated, because attraction is induced. ​ Negotiation is asking the other person to feel attraction, in other words, it is asking the other person to do your part. ​ Negotiation induces disappointment on the other person, because it proves that you can't do what is expected from you. ​ As an average-looking male who earns in the top 1% for my age group ​ That statement is your attempt to negotiate desire, and is broadcasting yourself as a beta buck.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 09:44 AM
2

Part of it is because welfare pays women to pretend to be single mothers. ​ The rest of it is because the blue pill brainwashes women into waiting until they are no more marriage worthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 02:09 AM
2

Yes. Do always just look for sex. If the woman wants a relationship, is her duty to get it, and to maintain it. ​ The second she stops working for it, she is no more horny towards you, and it is over.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 02:06 AM
1

Hypergamy means that women are temporarily attracted to men for biological reasons. ​ No woman can "fall in love" with you, and keep loving you because she loved you in the past. All the effort you spent on a relationship is not stored somewhere like savings in a vault, for which the woman will keep loving you. It is spent, gone. Irrelevant. Worthless. ​ A woman will want you as long as you are her best choice. Even if she is married, and pledged to love you, she can't. She will cheat if given t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 01:56 AM
1

No RP man becomes a "sugar daddy"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 01:51 AM
2

That's irrelevant. ​ Nothing changes the fact that a younger women are more attractive. Those women marry betas out of desperation. Their statistics are irrelevant. They do not matter anymore. You could cite statistics about 80 year old grannies. They would be equally irrelevant. "Less likely to divorce" is hiding the fact that divorce is still sky high on those women. You are hoping that you can cheat the reader into understanding "women do not divorce" with the phrase "less likely". Your "stat…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 01:48 AM
6

On the one hand you have a bunch of women who are quite outspoken about how marriage only benefits men That's a lie. Marriage is voluntary. Nobody points a gun to a woman's head and forces her to get married. ​ Women do not marry for generosity towards the man. Women marry exclusively for their own benefit, so it is a lie that marriage "only benefits men". ​ If a woman marries, is only because she thinks that she is better married than not married. ​ The argument that marriage "benefits men" on …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 01:40 AM
2

Men go into tremendous detail to prove the wage gap is not real, yet overuse vague statistics for divorce stats against women. Why do you think the details for initiating divorce doesn't matter? What is the point? Wage gap is a different matter than causes for divorce. You fail to make a connection, so all you are doing is trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 01:36 AM
0

No. It does not matters why women initiate divorce, but the fact that most divorces are initiated by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 01:33 AM
14

This is a cheap attempt to brainwash men into accepting cuckoldry. ​ First, your numbers are wrong, for many reasons. You are purposely, or ignorantly misunderstanding how gens propagate. ​ Men are not supposed to have one children but many. ​ One child, propagates 50% of gens 1 child, 50% of gens 2 child, 75% of gens 3 child, 88% of gens 4 child, 94% of gens 5 child, 97% of gens 6 child, 98% of gens 7 child, 99% of gens 8 child, 100% of gens ​ But also, the woman shares some gens with the man, …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 01:12 AM
1

But then people object that high quality, fun women are out there, but the reason I've never met any is supposedly that *I* just suck too much. Fair enough, MAYBE it's true. It's worth examining. Pretty quality fun women are taken out the market by alphas at 18/20. They are scarce and coveted. I mean seriously, when people are bringing up Oprah and Hillary Clinton, you know they're grasping at straws. Oprah is an elephant and Hillary is an Egyptian mummy. Both are also insufferable. I can barely…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 10:06 PM
0

google "woman name 2019"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 10:02 PM
1

Women break with their partner, for being nice and supportive
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 10:00 PM
-1

Same as with any other age. ​ Your question comes from the pretension of making no effort and being appreciated only for your beauty. ​ To stay in a relationship depends entirely from you, and most women fail at it, married to any age of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 09:20 AM
2

puke
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 09:17 AM
0

Gillian Jacobs, Emilia Clarke, Erin Moriarty, Karen Fukuhara, Emma Watson. They had all hit the wall
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 09:15 AM
0

None. ​ There is nothing special on any of them. I can find prettier women without much effort. ​ Even worse, all celebrity women are, at best, pump and dump material. They expect entitlement from their fame, and are rained all day with dick offers. That's the worst kind of woman. ​ Also, they are all prostitutes. No one got his role in a movie without paying it for sex. ​ All actresses today are sink on the hate speech of genre ideology, or they get kicked out of the industry. God luck expectin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 09:07 AM
1

This cringe fest, fake smile, rest of a man https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba5uqQdsL6Q
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 09:53 PM
0

Men hit the wall at 12. It's called being a beta. ​ At 25 is too late for you to get an alpha, so one of those men is your future. ​ Pick the less worse of them, and be warned that you are only 5 years from being 30. ​ The men you want are occupied with 18 girls. You could get one of them when you were 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 08:39 PM
0

"Getting to know each other" is a social cliche. ​ Women do not know what they want, so they recourse to cliches. The woman has an emotional need, which she can't verbalize, so she recourse to some common place phrase, and after the fact, she rationalizes whatever the outcome was. ​ So, asking that to a woman is a total waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 11:45 AM
0

Without game, it doesn't matter at all how good you look. ​ Looking good helps a bit, but looking bad hurts a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 04:25 AM
29

The concept of slut doesn't apply to men. It is a badge of honor. ​ What shames men is inceldom.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 07:02 AM
2

When women think of men, they think only of alphas. Betas do not exist on their minds. ​ So the woman takes for granted that the man is already alpha, and already is wanted by the woman. ​ The advice women give to men assumes that the man has all the power in the relationship, so women focus on the alpha men they had in the past, and project their insecurities. ​ The woman remembers "I was insecure about XXX", so they say "don't make women insecure about XXX". ​ The male reality is completely di…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 01:19 AM
1

One benefit of polygyny is that a woman does not just joins a man. She joins a community, to which she has girly things to talk about. The society she joins is far more solid and supportive than monogamist marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 01:06 AM
5

Married men have preselection, and all women are attracted to preselection. ​ She's not a "predator", but just a woman. ​ One way to pick up women is to pretend to be married.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 12:56 AM
3

The Red Pill does not hate women. ​ Describing women objectively is not misogyny. ​ Women being offended at the RP are entitled narcissists who are intolerant to criticism, and take everything personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 01:41 AM
1

Most people here understand LTR as including long-term dating That's ad populum fallacy. You either realize that dating is not written with R, and are a manipulative person, or you are not smart enough to be able to discuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 01:37 AM
0

Those women are the same as incel: working drones whose only purpose is to work for the benefit of the people that reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 01:33 AM
1

"Extremely attractive girls" are never in relationships with men to which "the girl is not attracted".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 01:26 AM
1

That's why western society is becoming dysfunctional everyday. Such an insecure childhood is the reason why eastern developing world is overtaking west. The commoner workforce is less motivated than ever before. The eastern world is overtaking because it adopted liberal free markets, and has larger markets. Just China has the population of all the nations spanned by Europe. China has more population than Europe, North America, and South America added. Meanwhile western societies are going the ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 01:20 AM
1

There is no pedestalization at all. Pedestalization has nothing to do with having a preference of low n-count wom Not for all, but due to religious purity culture, there absolutely is for many. It can affect men as well, and shames them for having sex before marriage. You are not talking about the red pill, but about religion. I'm not here to argue about magic. Your benefit is to not be rejected by your high n-count. My N is 1. And my dick is so large, it is used as bridge, and I collect million…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 01:09 AM
1

And we are very close to the singularity in which almost all human skills can be traded by machines, and yes, it includes creativity and imagination (read about the machine algorithms writing the news in the NYT and the sun, or the ones composing the songs for EA and Activision) Soon, work will become scarce, very scarce. Your argument is pointless. All the work today is very scarce compared to the work centuries ago, when people worked from dawn to dusk just to still suffer hunger, privations, …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 12:51 AM
2

I don't care if some men prefer low-N women like myself. I prefer to be with a man who doesn't pedestalize my lack of partners. There is no pedestalization at all. Pedestalization has nothing to do with having a preference of low n-count women. ​ You use the word "pedestalization" as a shame manipulation tactic, to delude men into stop prefaring low n-count women to avoid "pedestalizing " women. What "benefit"? What "entitlement"? No clue what you're referring to here. Your benefit is to not be …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 04:37 AM
1

All men want to be wanted. Betas need to be needed
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 04:27 AM
1

Let's stop fantasizing polygamy, it has not worked for masses - ever Polygyny is the reality of modern western societies. Half of children are born out of single mothers, and only the top 20% of men are siring those babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 04:24 AM
1

History has shown that monogamy has always worked best. Early humans preferred monogamy as it gave males confidences in there offspring being there own and gave females confidence in having a provider. That's a lie. There is ZERO proof of monogamy on "early humans". DNA demonstrates that most men died without having children. That's PROOF of polygyny. All societies living in the stone age recorded, were polygynous, and still are.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 04:19 AM
1

For much of human history women weren't choosing their partners Women choose their partners anyways by the way of cheating. That's why women evolved to hide their ovulation: to be able to get pregnant from alphas regardless of their "husband".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 04:15 AM
1

The truth is, polygyny intensifies economic inequality among men That’s a lie. The men that have to support larger families get poorer, and single men get richer, because they don’t have to support large families. For economic inequality to rise due to polygyny, it is necessary that the state taxes single men, to give the money to married men, as it does with welfare. That’s socialism, and socialism increases polygyny by removing the need to economically support large families. Under socialism, …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 04:13 AM
2

No. You have zero right to decide other people's preferences. ​ Preferences are arbitrary. Nobody has to explain his preferences to you. ​ If you don't like a man preferring low n-count women, that's 100% your problem. ​ The root of your problem is that you pretend to force men to not make the choices that benefit men, because it HURTS YOU. ​ You pretend that your benefit is over men's benefit. That's entitlement. ​ You want to restrict other people's liberty, for your own, exclusive benefit, ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 01:17 AM
12

Attractive people generally want to pair with other attractive people No. ​ EVERYBODY wants to "pair" with attractive people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 12:40 AM
1

The fallacy comes from the assumption that trade is an interchange of identical things. ​ If you have an orange, you value it higher than if you have a container full of a million oranges. Every individual orange has less and less value, the more you have. ​ If you have a million oranges, and no apple, then you may be willing to exchange one or more oranges for one apple. ​ The same happens when the other person has a lot of apples, and no orange. ​ The trade happens because every one gets diffe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 12:35 AM
2

The automation is rising and shortly we will have little to no use to humans, in a few years That's the Luddite fallacy. It is a falsehood, proven wrong again and again.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 12:16 AM
1

We do have to realize that while maybe the world does need less people than it has now That's the fallacy of overpopulation. It has been always argued, and proven false with time. Humans produce more wealth than they consume, and joining markets produces more wealth than the individuals markets separately, so increasing the population increases wealth per capita, and overall well being.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 12:14 AM
3

Enforced monogamy is sexual slavery and coercion, for the benefit of beta males. ​ The long term effect is the multiplication of beta males, with the degradation of society. When society gets degraded, people looks back, to when the situation was "better", and believes that monogamy was the reason for which it was "better", instead of the reason for which it was destroyed. ​ The present pandemic of beta males and even worse, incels, living on their mom's basement, and complaining than women don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 11:52 PM
1

Everybody pays taxes. You pay taxes on every thing you buy, you pay taxes when the government prints money, you pay taxes when the government takes debt. You always pay. Everybody pays.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 11:33 PM
2

Men are evolutionary competitors. ​ Any man having sex with another woman is an enemy, and if the woman is attractive is even worse. Lions and monkeys kill other males to get the females, and they even kill the other male's cubs, so the female only invests on his own cubs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 10:20 PM
1

Talking about "objectifying women" is hate speech against men. ​ There is nothing wrong in men being attracted to what men are attracted to. ​ The same people that demonizes men for "objectifying women", also pretends that people has to accept that gays and women should not be criticized for being attracted to what they are attracted. ​ The hate speech about "objectifying women" is abusing men for what they are naturally inclined to like. Nobody has right to complain about other people's taste.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 01:33 PM
1

"Emotional labour" is manipulative bullshit. An artificial, lie invented by communists to turn people into victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 01:27 PM
1

So, the idea is that being nice and kind to women DOES NOT get you sex or close to sex or even factor into that calculus. ​ That's wrong. Acting nice is a HUGE FACTOR, and is negative. It totally destroys the attraction a woman feels for a male. ​ If it didn't "even factor" the RP would not even care. ​ "Being nice" is a cheat that does not works, and is counterproductive. ​ But not "being nice" is not "being a jerk".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 01:21 PM
1

atheism/rationalism are dysgenic. you may see a way more religious future Religion breeds betas, so it is also dysgenic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 01:10 PM
1

The market always self correct. It is painful. ​ Markets turn bad when they are artificially interfered, and the longer the correction is delayed, the more catastrophic the correction becomes. ​ But life is short, and the correction may take much longer than your sexually active life will last. So do not plan your life for a corrected market. ​ That's why you have to enjoy the decline. Collect what you can on the time you are given to live. You can't wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 01:08 PM
1

No. ​ Some men are unfixable. ​ All you can do is to give the best advice, but that does not meant that the average guy will heard, understand, and implement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 12:54 PM
1

Marriage is an artificial invention. It is not biologically necessary. ​ A woman can have the best male when young. If she loses his opportunity, it is lost forever. If she chooses to not have it, because she would lose it, she would not have it anyways. ​ The benefits of the LTR are collected when young or never collected at all. ​ Her only chance is to have it young, or never having it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 12:44 PM
1

Women are sexually attracted to a small number of men. By definition, those are alphas. ​ Women are not sexually attracted to most men. By definition, those are beta males. ​ Wether you believe on it or not, is totally insignificant and inconsequential. ​ ------------------------ No. There are not alpha women. It does not makes sense. ​ Alpha males father most childs, and beta males cannot father those childs. No woman can block another woman from getting pregnant by the same alpha. For that rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 12:34 PM
1

You are trying to make an artificial rule about what "should be", raising your finger and preaching. ​ The market value is decided by the consumer. If women consume promiscuous men, then their market value is high. ​ You cannot choice by other people. You cannot set the price. ​ Your viewpoints are communist. You do not respect individual liberty. Communist's FATAL CONCEIT is to pretend to set the market value instead of understanding and accepting that the market (individual choice of free peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 12:07 PM
0

You are an example of it. You are malicious and manipulative. ​ Your intentions are inherently malevolent, so all you do is bad, because you have no intention do do good. ​ If you had good intentions, you would try to understand the male argumentation, but all you do is to try to misinterpret, deviate, blame, shame. ​ For that reason is not possible to have a civilized argument with you. It is a total waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 11:49 AM
1

Is not mater of shame. Is matter of convenience. ​ It is good for a man to have lots of sex. ​ It is also good for a man to have an LTR with non promiscuous women, and extremely bad to have one with promiscuous women. ​ What you are trying to do is to shame men for caring for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 11:39 AM
0

Families that get welfare money, are supporting they children with money taken for people that cannot afford their own children, becasue they are taxed to pay welfare. ​ Is not just money that is taken for working people: it's children. Children are taken from people who cannot afford them and given to people who doesn't care about affording child.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 11:31 AM
1

Absolutely no woman, or men, should have the freedom of making any decision that should be paid by third parties. ​ Liberty comes with responsibility. Your choice, you pay. ​ Men who are not responsible for her choice should not be taxed to pay for her choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 11:27 AM
0

You are not talking about "gender roles", but sexual preferences, which have an evolutionary origin, are tied to biology, and in no way are "gender roles". ​ "gender roles" is communist hate speech. His purpose his to disorient people, gaslighting them into believing that his personal problems are not their responsibility, but had been artificially created by other people, same as Hitler blamed Jews to control Germans. ​ First, they disorient you, blame unidentified people, for implied but never…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 06:39 PM
1

When will the pandemic realistically be over though? 2023 :( A single case may restart all of it, so It has to infect something like 80/90% of the population before enough people is immunized to stop it spreading. The longer the quarantine, the longer the pandemic will last. The coronavirus killed less people than the common flu normally kills in one year.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 06:15 PM
1

Irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 12:55 AM
1

Submissive women are usually quite passive. They don't approach, rather expect the man to escalate things and seem to hold themselves back in dating aswell as in relationships ALL WOMEN are like that What do they offer that would make up for being a passive character? Fallacy. Submissive does not means passive. ​ The non submissiveness is destructive to the relationship. A relationship cannot last if the woman does not submit to the man. That does not means that, all a woman has to be, is submis…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 12:08 AM
14

All "predictions" about the pandemic assume that the pandemic will be the new normal, and not a temporary problem. ​ The pandemic of the spanish flu was orders of magnitude worse that this one, and it was totally forgotten. ​ The only permanent change the pandemic will leave is that some socialist countries will be more broken, closer to the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 11:56 PM
1

All the women I know have multiple degrees, as do their husbands That's fallacy of "I know a counter example" (Which also is a non verifiable claim)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 11:52 PM
1

If having a career were attractive, TRP would be all about career women. How to find them, how to talk "educated", which ones make more money. Field reports would always mention the woman's career, how much money she makes, what her work was about. ​ That's not even argued. Not a single word. I even struggled to write what men would care about a woman's career. ​ I have a degree, had always been around professional women, and I guarantee to you: education doesn't makes a woman "smarter", more in…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 06:22 PM
1

I personally know a high status man who didn't want to marry his wife because she was not educated enough. They eventually got married, but this still causes strife in their marriage. It just means that he was a beta
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 05:59 PM
1

Because if you have to spend a lot of time with someone and cohabit with them, you want that person to be good company. Being able to hold a conversation that is stimulating is part of that You are revealing that you never had an LTR. Maybe never talked to a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 05:57 PM
2

Being entertaining has nothing to do with having a college degree The uneducated has fantasies about what the educated life is. They believe that a career makes people frolic blindly on rainbows.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 05:56 PM
3

An intelligent, career minded man is going to be bored to tears with an uneducated woman who works at wall mart. Bullshit. Nobody talks about quantum physics with his lover.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 05:53 PM
4

"Women don't care about men's dating struggles" is directed at men, so they understand that there is no "fairness" at all in dating, there is no expectancy of it, and there should not be. ​ Relationships are not a commercial exchange between equals. People get what they enjoy. ​ Men expecting compassion for not getting love, or "fairness" are just immature. The ones complaining that "women don't care", just don't get it, same as women complaining about "double standards". They are both retarded …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 05:45 PM
2

Or so QAnon wants people to think. I don't know or care who is qanon Fascism is all about socialism. If you disagree, it just makes you an ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 08:18 PM
1

If high n women can prove that they can stay faithful to one man No woman can prove anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 08:12 PM
3

AWALT literally applies to all women, or it would not be AWALT. ​ You misunderstand what it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 08:10 PM
1

Virgin women are awalt as any other woman. ​ All women are born virgin, and all women AWALT. ​ Appreciation for low notch count women is not pedestalization. Pedestalization is something different.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 08:07 PM
2

Is not matter of respect. Is matter of value and risk. ​ Promiscuous women offer lower value and higher risks. Value is paternity and loyalty. The risk is extinction, to cease to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 08:03 PM
2

The nazi Germany was driven by socialism. Eugenics was only a small part of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 07:59 PM
4

If it is voluntary, it is always consensual. ​ If the man stays on a sexless relationship, that's also consensual. ​ That's why marriage is a crime. It establishes obligations after consensus is lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 07:51 PM
1

Your demonstrably false position is this one: on the 70's, excess spending caused the oil crisis, the loss of the gold peg of the dollar, and after it, the government of USA started printing money and taking debt, causing real wages to progressively stagnate. Your argumentation is pathetic, because you are not accounting all the variables involved, and not accounting for long term effects.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 07:48 PM
3

There is a common misconception about the RP. People thinks that the RP uses science/evolution/statistics/papers to base RP conclusions. ​ But actually, TRP uses those things after the fact, to attempt to understand the conclusions, so arguing about it does not changes the conclusions. At best would put doubt on why it happens, and not on what happens. ​ TRP is collected common experience. When TRP concludes that women do XXX, or men are YYY, is not after some rational "justification". It is an …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 03:31 AM
1

Game is closing the deal with women who like you, not winning over women who think you’re disgusting. That's false. Lots of women find a man unattractive, but are won by his game.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 11:16 PM
1

Culture is slowly changing the rules of the game. It is making everyone, man or woman, focus more and more on physical appearance. What is attractive is written on DNA, and does not changes with culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 11:14 PM
3

Everybody has some game. The average guy game is a bad one. It is generally based on demonstrating to be a "nice guy", to negotiate attraction, to be "chosen" for being pretty or some magical reason. ​ But is game anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 11:13 PM
0

NO ​ Men have been brainwashed into submitting to female caprice to get sex. But the female brain perceives that as servitude and low status, because that's exactly what it is: male servitude and low status. ​ Women are right into rejecting those men, because those men are mentally broken. They had been abused, emotionally broken, and are incapable of working correctly. They are stuck in childhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 07:32 PM
-1

Your experiment is absurd, because men and women are biologically wired differently. ​ The only way a man could act as a woman is if his brain and entire body were wired differently, and then that man would discover that instinct overrides reason on women, so it does not natter what a man thinks he would do as a woman. ​ That's one reason for which transexuals cannot be women. They still have a male brain, (and not at all a female body, no matter how much surgery they have)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 07:26 PM
1

18 was chosen as age of adulthood, because that was the average age at which women married in churchs. ​ But the person that choose that age didn't understood mathematics. ​ Choosing the average means that 18 is too old for half of the population. So 18 is a totally arbitrary number. ​ On many countries, including developed ones, the legal age of consent is 12, and they work perfectly fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 07:20 PM
1

It's like asking what you think about air and the blue sky
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 07:16 PM
1

Because arguably, a more collectivist system of raising children that installs good virtues No collectivist system has good virtues. Any collectivism is against life, liberty and property, and that's fundamentally evil. ​ Any person that is willing to hurt people's liberty, life and property, is inherently evil, and has the opposite of "good virtues". ​ All collectivist systems had always failed, killing millions of people, and not even were able to self diagnose and correct themselves. The wors…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 01:13 AM
0

Monogamy in humans is the cultural sanction of one official wife at a time That's artificial, and sexual behavior is independent of "cultural sanction".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 01:02 AM
0

Monogamy has never existed
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:59 PM
1

I cannot judge all British women, but the ones I knew had disgustingly short hair. I was told that they live on an humid climate, that makes too expensive to care for long hair. Bu I do not really know.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:51 PM
1

Why should those children need to grow up without both necessary parent roles? Why should those children suffer the consequences of unresponsable parents? Why should I pay for it, and why my own children should be denied of existence for the fault of other people? If north Koreans choose a miserable life, I have to not pay for it. It is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:46 PM
2

Modern "feminism" (third wave feminism), is not even feminism. It is hate speech used by communists as a trojan horse to enforce communism under the carpet, everywhere. ​ It doesn't even care for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:44 PM
2

State-owned services are just like private services. If they aren´t thought through and half-assed, they won´t work State owned services are always corrupt, no matter how "thought" they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:39 PM
1

NO. Why I have to pay for other people's mistakes? ​ If you take my money, for the state to spend on anything, I have less resources to spend on my own children, and I'm blocked from having my own children. The state is robbing my own sons, and giving children to other people. ​ That's eugenics against me. Other people is free to make any mistakes, as long as they do not pass the bill to me. If I have to pay the bill, responsibility comes with authority, so I should have the authority to control…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:35 PM
1

50 people paying 200,000$ in tax each is a lot less than 5 million people paying 10,000$ in tax each. Those 200.000$ come from the 5 million people who buys whatever those 50 people sell. Money is not wealth. Money are management rights. When the government takes money, by taxing, money printing or issuing debt, the government is not taking money. It is taking real wealth, and that wealth is taken from the entirety of society, which is forced to consume less cars, burgers and furniture and is bl…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:20 PM
1

Conflicts are the fault of the people who lies about human nature. Men and women are not equal. Are different. It is abusive and immoral to force both men and women to abide by the same rules, specially rules made by third parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:16 PM
1

I can think of Brazilians, a Chilean, a couple Russians, a couple Scandinavians, plenty of Canadians and Brits You live out of reality. Brazilians and Chileans can be of any race and any culture. Russians can be white europeans, asiatic chinese, chirstian, muslim. Canadians can be black muslims, or korean atheists. Brits can be anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:09 PM
1

I didn't participated on any survey I do not give personal information
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:05 PM
2

taking women out to dinner Taking women out to dinner is wrong for any age. It means that you are clueless about what makes a woman attracted to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:04 PM
1

NO. You are free to create a new reddit forum, but not at all to rule this one to your whims. ​ TRP is concerned with human nature, not local specificities. ​ Biology doesn't care about your culture. RP knowledge has been taken from men all around the world. A much larger sample than will ever be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 08:01 PM
2

If you brainwash people to believe that "masculinity is toxic", and women are attracted to masculinity, it means that women are attracted to toxicity. ​ If you brainwash people to believe that "alpha behavior is wrong", and women are attracted to alphas, it means that women are attracted to wrongness. ​ If you brainwash people to believe that "feminism is the contract", and women are not attracted to feminist men, it means that women are delinquent. ​ If you brainwash people to believe that "som…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 07:50 PM
5

Both sides do not understand that it is you who makes yourself likable or not. ​ It is not the other person's duty to love you. ​ You can't decide what the other person has to enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:59 AM
20

Government handouts never "come from the rich". ​ When you tax "the rich", they pass the bill to their income source, which is always the common people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:54 AM
1

Definition of women: XX chromosomes, age between 16-24, no tatoos, natural hair color, slim, fun and charismatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:50 AM
2

It has a well established definition in sociology. And that definition isn't "when a woman wants me to do ANYTHING AT ALL before fucking me." Irrelevant. TRP has his own definition of hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:38 AM
1

That's bullshit. The redpill originated as a response to feminism. No. The red pill originated as PUA techniques
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:37 AM
1

Apathetic most probably means depression, and has a biological reason behind. ​ "Dropping out of society" is too vague and undefined to argue about
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 09:47 PM
2

black is comprised of all the colors No black is the absence of color. ​ White is the superposition of all colors. ​ You may be confused by pigmentation, which is used in pencils. Pencils subtract color, so when you mix many different pencils, all colors are subtracted, and the result is black.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 09:35 PM
1

No. Bluepill is anything non redpill. It can be religious, moralistic, polytical or anything non feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 09:33 PM
1

Proposal Denied ​ You can't change the meaning of existing words. All you do is to break with reality, and creating meaningless FALLACIOUS argumentation. ​ The purpose of redefining words, is to argue in one logic, with one meaning, pretending a different logic and a different meaning. It is malicious in nature, and destroys all your argumentation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 09:31 PM
3

One advice is not good enough. ​ Most incels have complex misunderstandings of reality, which need to be analyzed and fixed. ​ They also are emotionally broken, and that's the hardest thing to fix.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 09:17 PM
1

Can you start and sustain conversations with strangers?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 09:13 PM
1

No. At best, women will stand around for no reason, expecting to be opened. ​ Some rare cases, will ask you something casually. Once. ​ All women do, is to give you a chance to seduce them, but none will throw herself at your arms, or will start gaming you. Women still need to be seduced.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:57 PM
1

Stop caring about religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:53 PM
1

It's called hitting the wall
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:45 PM
2

You can only learn something by practicing it. ​ That's what it means. ​ Instead, work on actually being confident before you start dating Bullshit. Confidence in dating is a different skill, that can only be achieved by practice. ​ Take some time off (I'm thinking a year) to work on yourself and then come back to the dating scene with fresh new eyes Bullshit. No practice, no experience, no advancement. You are advising to waste an entire year of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:34 PM
7

It is foolish to threat women as equals, or expect to have a rational argumentation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:21 PM
0

I'm applying for kindergarten
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:18 PM
4

That's because women find self esteem, to the point of arrogance, extremely attractive on men, and believe that women are equal to men. They believe that men are also attracted to male traits, and advice women to be masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:10 PM
3

The FDS has absolutely no clue on how men and women relate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 07:53 PM
1

I recommend you to start by "On the Origin of Species", by a funny dude called Charles Darwin.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 07:48 PM
9

And you are the result
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 07:45 PM
6

There is no equality. ​ Men want what is best to men, and women want what is best to women. ​ It is ridiculous to talk about "double standards"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 07:36 PM
1

Hypergamy has a purpose, and it is to explain to men that women feel attraction for evolutionary reasons, and not for magical reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 07:29 PM
2

You are moralizing, and the red pill is amoral. ​ You are pretending to change the definition of hypergamy, and you are not entitled to do it. ​ You have no clue what is hypergamy, so you are beating a strawman which you named "hypergamy".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 07:26 PM
0

Young women also beta buck men. ​ All men, alphas an betas want young women. ​ Beta bucking does not means being in a relationship in exchange for money. Beta bucking is extracting resources from betas with or without relationships. ​ "Alpha fucks, beta bucks" is not "the way betas get relationships". It describes how women are sexually attracted to alphas, and betas are used as drones, like worker ants. A beta on the friendzone, is beta bucking, but he gets no sex or relationships. ​ Alphas OFF…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 07:18 PM
1

There is general beauty, a criteria shared by everybody, and also an element of randomness. It is not black and white. It is a superposition. ​ Beauty is not subjective, or it would not be beauty. It would be preference. Beauty displays youth, fertility, and lineage. Pretty women are preferred by the majority of men. Ugly women are disliked by the majority of men. But on top of it, there are extra points taken or given. That's the subjective part: just the topping. ​ Part of the attractiveness t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/20 05:31 PM
0

Your issue is that you are on the mindset that you need to pay for love, and negotiate love. ​ You can't pay for it. Love cannot be negotiated. Love is not voluntary. ​ Love is made feel by you in her, and it is mostly arousal. ​ Beta simping kills love, and you beta simp, because you believe that you have to buy love. ​ Your root problem is that you do not value yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/20 05:06 PM
1

most young women don't live or focus on having Childern That's irrelevant, because women act on instinct regardless of what they believe
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/20 03:43 PM
1

Many alpha males are broken, don't make a cent, and will never do, are irrecoverable drug addicts, or prisoners in jail. ​ To ask about money is the mindset of negotiating attraction, and to expect women to be rational.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/20 03:36 PM
1

The cuttlefish sneaks between other cuttlefish mating, and rapidly fertilizes female eggs. ​ Cuckolds do not provide any security or resources, and use other birds to feed his own. ​ What counts is the result: success reproducing. As long as an organism is successful, anything counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 11:33 PM
3

In other words, humans follow they own interest, and don't care for each other. ​ That's why it is ridiculous to complain about double standards and "they bad". It is not their problem, but your problem, for assuming blue pill fantasies. ​ Sex is a market. You do not go to a market complaining that the dude demanding money for oranges does not gives oranges, and that's a double standard. ​ You pay something you have, in exchange for something you do not have. You do not give the same thing that …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 03:37 PM
1

Precisely why if you're gonna pay as a guy, you're best served paying directly for guaranteed sex with a hotter girl AKA prostitution
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 03:30 PM
1

You only might need someone else if you associate your sexuality with a partner We are not talking lgbt issues here. Go to the rainbowpill for that
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 03:29 PM
1

Medicine and DNA testing are irrelevant. ​ Humans didn't evolved to take medicine or DNA tests. A high n-count woman instinctually inspires disgust on men, and there is no way to rationalize it away. ​ Trying to convince a man to not care about n-count, is like trying to convince a woman to not care about the betaness and low status of a man. If a man inspires disgust in a woman, no way she will be convinced with logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 02:01 AM
1

None at all. ​ If it is to be passed, is not a red flag. ​ All red flags are non starters for LTR, and some are even red flags for sex. So, a red flag may be overlooked for sex, but not for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 01:50 AM
0

No. Those are completely different mechanisms. ​ Female sex drive is aroused by the male. It requires face to face interaction, unless special cases where the woman takes preselection for granted, because the man is popular/famous. ​ Male sex drive is always on, and there is no need of personal interaction. ​ Men are everyday on, but women may get aroused only the days they are fertile, and even then, need personal interaction with a prospective male.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 01:45 AM
3

Again, you make the grave error of confusing all men into one, when there are two main types of men: alphas and betas. ​ Alphas don't need to spend money to get any woman, so any goldigging is only negative. There is no positive side to it. ​ Betas need to compensate for their lack of alphaness, so they may pay prostitutes, or enter a deal of sex for money. But they delude themselves. The woman is never going to love him, and is going to cheat/monkey branch if the opportunity presents.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 01:38 AM
1

To go further, EVERYTHING that we are and do is the result of these instincts and they often go against our self interest. No. You can act on reason, or on instinct. Those said, it is common in women to act out of instinct, but after the fact rationalize it, making up a bullshit explanation, that doesn't really makes sense. The RP calls it "hamstering".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 01:34 AM
1

That it sounds the same doesn't mean that it is the same. We are talking here about the RP. So we use the RP concept. If you want to talk about something else, I do not care to talk about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 01:29 AM
1

Where I live, you can't be married to more than one person. If I'm the wife then no other woman can have the same level of commitment, whether it's cheating or a poly situation. The intention is to unite two and only two people. Nuclear family units consisting of more than two adults are not recognized legally or socially. A poly relationship is not a family, it's just for fun like FWBs. There's a reason why poly and childfree communities overlap heavily. That polygamist marriages are banned whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 03:19 PM
1

This is the dumbest shit I've ever read. ^ This is you being overridden by your feelings How can feelings "override" your brain if that's how your brain works in the first place? Feelings take control of the brain, which has other, different processes. For example, you see a shadow, and you jump away, no matter what you were doing. Maybe you jumped at something irrelevant, or maybe you jumped away form a spider, or a snake, but your DNA programmed that behavior in you, to save your life. Otherwi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 03:16 PM
1

If men were not hypocritical they wouldn’t choose to create a term with negative connotations that is intended to shame a behavior Same as "burglar": a "term with negative connotations that is intended to shame a behavior"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 02:53 PM
2

They term exists because men are hypocritical Quite the contrary: men tell to you, in your face, what men want. That's the opposite of hypocritical. and they do have an double standard And that's a good thing: men and women are different, so cannot be evalued by the same rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 02:51 PM
2

Gold digger shaming is a form of discrimination in the same way that rapist shaming is a form of discrimination. Men are extremely shallow and literally will select a mate primarily based on their looks Women are extremely shallow and literally will select a mate primarily based on their preferences It's a complete double standard. Your entire argumentation is a complete double standard. Men, start taking responsibility Responsability=doing what you want, for your exclusive benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 02:43 PM
1

Totally correct. ​ Human beings only act on incentives, to get what they don't have. ​ That's why socialism fails: the incentive to work is removed, because there is no profit in working. The person receives the same pay. The incentive is to do the minimal work, or not work at all. ​ The same thing happens in marriage: there is no incentive in working for the other person's pleasure, because the person is already owned, and cannot walk away easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 09:35 PM
-1

Women of course don't want to admit they do this, so they 'reinterpreted' the friend zone No. Women cannot "reinterpret" a definition. Women do not have a say on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 09:30 PM
2

No. You are trying to redefine the "friendzone", and you are not entitled to do it. ​ This is what most women consider the friendzone That's a lie. The friendzone is a RP concept. It is totally independent of what "women consider". No woman has a say on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 09:26 PM
1

No. Women of all ages beta buck men. ​ A man is beta bucked, because he IS BETA, not for the woman he's dating. ​ Women want to fuck one alpha, the best one, but beta buck all the man possible, simultaneously.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 09:22 PM
1

No. Marriage can be polygamous. Marriage and monogamy are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 09:08 PM
1

Marriage is a territorial contract between beta males. It establishes that a woman is property of a given male, and out of reach for the other men. ​ On modern societies, marriage is absolutely pointless, because it is no more acceptable for a woman to be a property of a man, and marriage is no barrier that protects the man from cheating. ​ Marriage has been turned into a contract between the man and the woman, which is highly biased in favor of the woman, and all benefits for the male had been …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 09:05 PM
0

irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 09:01 PM
9

Why does it matter if a woman did some sex act with someone else that she now refuses to do with you? Women make rules for betas, and break rules for alphas. ​ The more conditions a woman makes, the less she is attracted to a man. ​ Alphas never get a no.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 03:23 PM
3

Either you accept it or not, you are a machine and an animal. ​ That doesn't makes you less human. It is part of being human. ​ You are not an ethereal being, made of clouds, existing outside of the physical world. ​ You bleed like any other animal, you are made of the same atoms than your car. You consume carbon for energy, like machines do. ​ You are not over the laws of physics. ​ You exist to propagate your DNA, and for that purpose, your DNA has implemented shortcuts in your brain, that tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 03:18 PM
1

Women have it much easier than men on getting sex. ​ What is far harder, is to secure an alpha for LTR, for the simple reason that alphas are super, ultra scarce.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/20 01:20 AM
1

The RP totally embraces about "How To Have Casual Sex". It never changed. ​ That does not excludes LTR. There is no contradiction. ​ Men improve with casual sex. It is the woman's LTR value to a man the thing that falls. But there are always new young girls added to the pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/20 01:15 AM
2

What are you doing on the incel forum. It will rotten your brain. ​ It is bad if you are blue pill, bad if you are red pill, bad if you are incel. ​ The ince forum is equivalent to the FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/20 01:10 AM
2

Boyfriend has to The "HAS" is where he fails. ​ If he HAS to do anything, she doesn't value him. Alphas do not have to do anything, because alphas are desired. ​ The second a woman puts conditions on the man, and he accepts the conditions, he's a beta, and no more desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/20 01:05 AM
3

For casual sex, it doesn't matters. ​ For LTR, anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/20 12:54 AM
2

You think that believing the women you fuck can't possibly be sexually attracted to you and are only attempting to use you... benefits men? Because it seems like an extremely harmful thought process, to me. One that would deeply get in the way of building love and trust in another human being. Which would get in the way of building and maintaining connections with women. You don't see how despising and resenting the gender you are attracted to can fuck up your ability to have meaningful connecti…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/20 12:01 AM
2

It allows men to see their partners as fully human and actually capable of being attracted to them. TRP presents every relationship as both parties using each other... if you believe that a woman can't be into you unless you are in the top 20% and is only using you for your beta bucks... then you can't actually accept a woman who IS in fact attracted to you. That any woman who seems excited to be fucking you is only trying to trap and use you... you don't see how that can be damaging to a dude..…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:58 PM
1

​ ​ Pinochet still did it in the name of Austrian Economics, even non-Communists like Keynesians got killed. Franco in Spain had an early version. Pinochet was given the same advice that was given to anybody. The same liberal advice that was given to Norway, to Ireland, and to China. The same advice made Norway rich. Ireland was one of the poorest European nations, and after it applied the economic reforms, it is today one of the richest. Chile was the poorest South American nation under communi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:41 PM
1

​ Its known life was worse off for everyone under the Guilded Age which neoliberal or Austrian economists want to imitate. As it is today on socialist nations. Austrian economists are the exact opposite of that. Let's see what Austrian economists actually say: Friedrich August von Hayek, The Road to Serfdom “Our freedom of choice in a competitive society rests on the fact that, if one person refuses to satisfy our wishes, we can turn to another. But if we face a monopolist we are at his absolute…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:40 PM
1

​ Only democracy having more power than private interests, and the democratic government protecting the vulnerable from being dominated by the more powerful to ensure democracy. We can’t let people form ‘packs with alphas/lords’ at the top or parallel power structures. Alphas always rise to the top of any hierarchy. All socialists nations are ruled by alphas. Just look at Fidel Castro, Kim Jong-il, Putin, Stalin, Maduro, Mao Zedong. All billionaires. Alphas do not only rise to power in socialism…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:40 PM
1

​ “The Great Depression in the 1930s, which severely decreased economic output throughout the world and produced high unemployment and widespread poverty, was widely regarded as a failure of economic liberalism. (Commentary: Essentially people saw economic liberalism as dead, Keynesianism and Truman’s economics gained ground) As I explained to you, keynesianism is just an mathematically unfounded excuse to print money. Keynesianism is taxation without representation. It is robbery. ​ Liberals ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:39 PM
1

False information, it existed since 1938. Austrian economists may have even called themselves it briefly. The term is used to identify them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism That's a lie. Wikipedia is edited by anybody, and if can be made to claim anything anybody wants it to claim. ​ But your entire argumentation is destroyed by your link, where it says: " The term is rarely used by proponents of free-market policies.[22] Some scholars have described the term as meaning different thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:39 PM
1

See what I mean? An ideology revolving around the theories of Hayek, Friedman and Mises that claimed to be about a ‘return to Liberalism’. Hence ‘Neo Liberalism’. No. Classic does not mean new. There never was "another" liberalism, so there is no "return". ​ There is no need to create a new word for a concept that already is well defined, unless you want to exploit the new word by itself. ​ Keynesianims is not liberalism. Keynesianism is socialism. ​ The same way you would use ‘Neo’ on anybody t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:37 PM
2

I’m saying trying to shove the complexity of an entire gender into AWALT is harmful to the people who believe it. Especially people who are attracted to women. AWALT gives you all a very bleak and very incorrect theory of mind that causes resentment and anger towards the gender you are attracted to. How does your theory benefits men?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 04:48 PM
2

What about poly women? Asexual women? Women who don’t want commitment? Women who don’t want marriage? Women who don’t want kids? Women who are deeply interested in their careers? What about ALL the women TRP ignores in order to attempt to make AWALT a thing? Those are too wide and vague questions. Answering them would take a book. ​ But short answer: TRP does not cares, because TRP is advice for men. TRP says "this is a problem, this is a good solution, for the RP man" If some women don't like i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:39 AM
1

So why hate gold diggers.....you made the comment, not me. You asked "What is so wrong about gold diggers" I explained to you what harm a gold digger does to a man. That's what is "so wrong". ​ The "hate" is on you. Pointing to a real, well founded, fault is not hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:32 AM
0

It’s mainly Austrian school of economics and market classicalism that governments adopted in the 90s and 80s. No. That's a strawman. Neoliberalism is a bogeyman, without any definition. It is purposely left without any concrete definition, so it can be adapted to any need of the hate speech against liberalism, as you are doing now. By being left undefined, you can argue anything about "neoliberalism", to make one point, and at the next moment you can contradict yourself, but then cover your lies…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:16 AM
1

On the red pill, hypergamy is the instinct of the woman to have sex/relationships with the most alpha male she can get. It is inspired on sociology, but is not the same concept. ​ The point of talking about hypergamy, is to debunk the "soul mate" myth. ​ The blue pill teach men that women fall in love for mysterious, quasi religious reasons, and that leads men to self destructive behavior, and unrealistic expectations. Hypergamy explains to men that women pursue their biological instinct to mate…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 04:36 AM
-1

Men chasing women is a biological reality. It will never change. It has nothing to do with "gender roles". ​ By the way, your use of the word "gender" is not "gender". ​ Socialists use the dirty trick of redefining words, creating a new word which sounds the same, but is a different concept, and then purposely use both meanings of the word as if it were the same. ​ Gender has two meanings, the one it always had, and the new one invented by socialists. When you use the word "gender", you are maki…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 03:54 AM
1

It is always misinterpreted. ​ Men are not attracted to women with a career. A career only makes a woman older, and worse company, because she doesn't have time to please the man. ​ Still women have to work, but that does not makes a woman attractive. The fact that a woman has to work, only makes it worse. ​ Women have to work for practical reasons: -She has to sustain herself so the relationship may end/divorce without financial cost to the man. That's a legal problem, which makes women less at…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 12:56 AM
2

Those are risks in all marriages no matter who you marry.... and???
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 12:39 AM
3

Men are incapable of seeing gay women as a part of ‘women’? My complaint was TRP doesn’t consider many many many different types of women, gay women being a part of that. TRP does not benefit on any way from considering lesbian women. That's all that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 12:38 AM
1

It already happens, and is the most common way men and women relate. Not "acceptance" is needed. ​ The majority of men get little sex, or nothing at all, and a small number of men get all the women. ​ It is not formalized as polygynous marriage, because marriage itself is mostly dead. But the fact that it is informal, allows people to rationalize it as "not cheating". ​ Most women engage in polygynous relationships with alphas, until they get too old, and get discarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 12:30 AM
1

That is false, because all modern countries already live in polygamy, and millions of men are left alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 12:20 AM
1

The blue pill has taught you a wrong model that goes this way: ​ 1.Male asks for a date to a woman, and romances her 2.If woman finds the romance good, she falls in love 3.If the woman falls in love, she has sex 4.The princess marry the prince, and they live happily forever. ​ What you call romance, is a negotiation. You had been taught that the negotiation is rational. ​ But that's not at all how it works. How it works is encoded on DNA, and controlled by feelings. It is animal. ​ The real way …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 11:54 PM
3

I agree. But words mean things. And when you hear ‘all women’ you start to think ‘all women’ and start to say ‘all women’ and that genuinely hurts a guy’s chance of finding mutual respectful partnerships. That's because all women are solipsistic, and each woman imagines that the man talks about her, and wonders "how does this is about me". A woman that complains that RP men are not considering lesbian women, is non capable of putting herself on the man's shoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 11:18 PM
1

TRP should ... No. TRP should not do anything you want. That's your problem, not TRP problem. ​ The TRP advises men on the common situations. It does not makes sense to waste effort on "neurodiversity", because that does not benefits most men on most cases. ​ TRP is advice from men, to men, on the best interest of men. ​ Does TRP take neurodiversity into account? No Should it? No Why, or why not? Because the TRP does not has psychiatric knowledge on how to deal with non neurotypial women, and sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 10:53 PM
2

I have friends and co workers with autistic kids. I see how they act. I watched that show dating on the spectrum. I see few parallels to the nonsense that goes on around here. Aspergers are on the autistic spectrum and you would not even notice them, because not even they know it. ​ Aspergers look normal. Just a bit eccentric. ​ But there is also an epidemic of false self diagnosed aspergers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 10:22 PM
1

There is a higher proportion of autistic, than on the general population, but definitely not "most men on RP"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 10:17 PM
2

Yes, it gets easier, but avoid women over 25. ​ Also, do not use it as excuse for not doint pick up. Women will never throw themselves at you just because you are over 30. ​ No woman is going to find you pretty, and fall in love with you, just for your looks, age, money. ​ You need experience with women at any age. That's the only thing on which you can count. If you do not have experience at 30, it will be harder to start at that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 10:16 PM
3

Being a gold digger means that the woman does not loves the man, but his money. ​ In other words, he's a beta buck, and risks being disrespected, cuckolded, cheated and divorce-raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 10:12 PM
1

Women don't care about the male n-count. The ones claiming to care here are only trying to punish men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 10:05 PM
2

Every single man I’ve known irl who is actually popular with women might be a little turned off if a woman has a number in the triple digits but otherwise they have a “don’t ask don’t tell” policy. Because any man with experience rapidly learns that acting like it matters, is a turn off. To seduce a woman, is necessary to act like it doesn't matters or even is cool. ​ Also, women with high n-count tend to be better on bed. ​ But that does not means that it is acceptable for a LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 10:01 PM
1

Left leaning girls definitely think this is "BAD ASS AF" Irrelevant. Women think and say a lot of things, but the only thing that counts is behavior, not thinking or opinions, and it is the rule that women behave in ways incompatible with their opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 09:56 PM
1

I give your coins back, because my account is temporary, and your gold will be wasted.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 09:51 PM
1

It is unusual, and it is odd, but some people is unusual and odd. ​ It is the same as being blind is unusual, being albino is unusual, being gay is unusual. ​ Men care, because it has real world consequences. Women don't care so much. ​ It is unusual for men to not care. Genuinely non caring generally means that the man doesn't wants an LTR, but only casual sex. ​ Women don't care so much, because women have nothing to lose.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 09:45 PM
1

What causes this difference? Why should be any similarity? ​ You are randomly picking completely different things. ​ What causes the difference between a mat and a cloud?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 09:36 PM
1

You keep repeating the same points over and over again, maybe because you have no refutations You keep repeating the same points over and over again, maybe because you have no refutations ​ There is no neoliberalism. It is a made up word made by socialists. ​ You cannot provide a definition of neoliberalism. ​ You cannot provide the "neoliberal doctrine". ​ You cannot cite any neoliberal economic teory. ​ A bunch of retards on /r/anything doesn't means anything, and that's the only thing you got…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 09:09 PM
0

Most men would fuck anything, if there is not a better choice available. ​ Men have the biological urge to spread their seed. ​ But is false that "validation from another men" has priority over getting sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 02:55 PM
1

No. Neoliberalism does not exists. ​ "Neoliberalism" is a slur made up by socialists. ​ There is no neoliberal movement. Nobody self identifies as neoliberal. Nobody teachs neoliberal doctrine. No university teachs neoliberalism. There are no neoliberal books. ​ Neoliberalism is a strawman made by socialists, to be able to appropriate some liberal flags. ​ Neoliberalism is a socialist cope mechanism to pretend that the amazing success of liberalism is not "liberalism", because they criticize "ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 02:14 PM
2

Crazy as it sounds, men can actually say no. "crazy" as mentally incapacitated. ​ Men don't "say no", because men do the approach. It is the woman the one who says yes/no
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 02:10 PM
1

Why do some guys complain about women having it easy for being hot but then are the same people who give them attention online Being hot and receiving that attention is exactly the same thing. There is no contradiction there. ​ The question deserves the stupid award of the century.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 02:41 PM
3

I've found the exact opposite to be true. The nicest women I know have had lots of casual sex An no man want a woman that is always that nice to other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 02:35 PM
5

Does he have a high n-count because relationships failed or a high n-could because he treats women like meat? He has a high n-cont because he has been rewarded by women for being what women want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 02:31 PM
1

There is no double standard, because men are women are different. ​ A double standard only exist for the exactly same conditions. ​ There is no double standard in giving less food to a bunny than to a horse. ​ Women get pregnant, and men do not. ​ Men and women collect different benefits, and pay different costs. ​ It s absolutely impossible to force men and women to get the same benefit, and pay the same cost. ​ The claim that there is a "double standard" is the pretension that only men, have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 02:29 PM
1

That is a Neoliberal notion Neoliberalism does not exists. It is a strawman
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 01:56 PM
0

There is nothing immoral there. ​ A dumped woman is 100% responsible, and a man used for money is also. ​ Not being lovable is not other people's fault. Love is not owed. ​ You are responsible for your choices. Your freedom comes with responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 01:53 PM
1

As an example, most women are attracted to men who ignore them/are aloof/assholes. Why don't you try walking on the street, completely ignoring all women, and count how many of them throw themselves at you? ​ It will be zero. ​ Even if a woman somewhat likes you, and open a conversation with you, if you ignore her, or pretend to be non interested, it still will be zero. ​ Reality is far more complicated than your depiction. ​ A man has to approach women, not ignoring them. A man has to seduce wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 11:24 AM
1

This is a bunch of ideological lies and non verifiable claims
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 11:16 AM
1

Nobody said that the legal contract is null. Quite the contrary
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 11:08 AM
1

The blue pill message is "Do nothing, except being a doormat, love will fall in your arms, because there is a soulmate for everybody. All your problems are other people's fault"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/20 03:07 PM
1

Dating advice for men typically sounds something like: "Work on yourself and your personality. Love yourself. Yap yap yap," while dating advice for women is "Lose some weight. Dress for your body type. Use makeup to highlight the good and hide the bad. Be more attentive and interested." That's a lie. You are trapped 60 years on the past, and have no contact with the real world. ​ Modern dating advice for women is "you are a queen, you do not need a man for anything, you are super special and per…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/20 03:00 PM
1

You are doing brainwashing, using different meanings for the same word, to make up a fallacious reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/20 02:53 PM
3

A woman that cheats is no more married. She's only on a legal contract. ​ Marriage doesn't makes sense. If a woman loves a man, she works to keep him. When she stops working, there is no point in keeping the LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/20 01:56 PM
1

yes of course, that is the main reason, my post was another good reason. No. You are pretending to portray a secure man as insecure. Yes men are insecure. Insecurity is a fear. A man acting logically on his own benefit is not acting out of fear, he's acting out of certainty. He's confident. ​ A promiscuous woman is objectively a bad choice for LTR. ​ A man that rejects a bad woman is totally secure on himself, acting rationally.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/20 08:59 AM
0

Men judge women on their N-count because women judge men on their sexual prowess No. A man judge what benefits himself, and a woman judge what benefits herself, on evolutive terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 04:30 PM
3

Alphas are idiots who think looks are everything, and deem anyone that isn't inhuman to women a weak pussy. That's the war cry of the incel: "you don't like me, so it is your fault"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 01:00 PM
0

Women lose the desire, only with beta males. ​ Many women resigned to a beta male only stand him, for the purpose of having a child, and then say "mission accomplished", "I don't need to stand him anymore". ​ That's a different phenomenon than post partum depression, which is normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 10:21 AM
2

On the other hand, when observing women's reaction to rich and hot celebrities, this seems to be on the contrary. instead, but those men that are extremely attractive (like the top 0.01% will be the most desirable thing in existence? Those men are attractive because women discount that they have preselection, not for being pretty. ​ There was an experiment done where ugly men were made to be followed by a fake cohort of actors playing as photographers and journalists, on shoppings and public pla…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 10:06 AM
1

There is no "men". There are alphas, and betas. Different species.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 09:58 AM
1

women can say no, we aren’t ruled by our dicks No you don't have a dick. That's why you need to be ruled by other's dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 09:54 AM
1

When I was 20, I dated 20 year olds, now that I'm in my 30s, I date girls in their 30s. Because you aren't worthy of the best women. You deserve leftovers, if anything. I don't know how old you are, but I doubt any self respecting 20 year old would come near you Another proof that you are a beta. Women don't "come near". It is up to men to do it. Worthless men behave like women, passively, expecting to be approached. All you are doing is virtue signalling, to show that you "are approachable" Bei…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 09:53 AM
1

You don't have a point. Demonizing natural behavior is de-humanizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 09:47 AM
1

Neanderthals interbred with homosapiens. And went extinct
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 09:45 AM
0

Why does my opinion not counts? Because beta males don't count. If you can't handle a 20 year old, you are beta
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 04:38 PM
5

A man has to seduce a woman. Not getting sex is a failure. ​ A seduced woman can't say no. So if she can say no, she isn't really attracted to him, and he's worthless. ​ So the relationship is already a failure. He's bad for her, and she's bad for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 04:16 PM
-1

Hard disagree as a man in his 30s. I want nothing to do with a 20 year old girl But your opinion doesn't counts
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 04:12 PM
1

Men don't view women as equals or human beings. they see women as objects, a resource of potential free sex and ego boost You de-humanize men and women by demonizing men's interest in sex, and demoting the sexual value of a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 04:12 PM
1

Why isn't there a REAL equivalent for female dating statergy for men? Because most women are totally oblivious the the need to have a strategy. When a woman realizes that she needs to worry, is always too late. ​ Even worse, women believe that they have abundant advice, but is always malicious advice, from feminists who really don't have women's interest on mind, or from older women who totally failed at relationships. ​ The main feminist intellectuals are lesbian women for which destroying hete…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 04:06 PM
1

The birth rate is already declining so idk about this one. The people who fails at reproduction cease to exist, and the ones who are successful become the only ones that keep existing. That's why neardentals do not count anymore. They failed, ceased to exist, and you can only find anything about them on museums.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 03:45 PM
2

Alphas tend to be more extroverted, and better at "de-introvert" introverted women. ​ Women are on the middle. ​ Betas tend to be the most introverted.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 03:43 PM
1

Ok, so both the ones willing and unwilling count? So is his value an average of all 20 year old women's opinions? An alpha bangs a lot of the prettiest. So he has high value. A beta may bang a lot of ugly ones, but not the prettiest, so he has lower value than the alpha. An incel may think of himself as ultra duper high value, but he can't bang anything, so he's worthless or even has negative value. Maybe some low value girls would want to bang the incel, but he doesn't want to go that low. Sinc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 03:36 PM
1

So all the 20 year olds that find him gross don't count because they won't bang him? Or do they count because he's trying to bang them? If he bangs the girl, he has great value. If he doesn't bang them, he's worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 03:26 PM
-1

What would be the point of women dating men? Reproduction. Survival of the species.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 03:21 PM
1

Because men and women are not equal. ​ The burden of initiating a relationship falls on men. It comes with the risk of being rejected.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 03:03 PM
1

What’s your definition of “a good person”? On this context, you are good if you are in a good, stable relationship. Otherwise, you failed, and are bad at relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 02:57 PM
2

So your value (and the value of all males) is whatever women decide. Exactly. But only the women that consume the product decides my value. A person that eats lettuce doesn't decide the value of chocolate. Only the people that eats chocolate does. So an old guy hitting on 20 year olds is a disgusting creep. Wrong. The value is set by the consumer. If that old guy bangs the 20 year old, he is valued by a 20 year old. Your opinion doesn't counts at all, because you are not the consumer.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 02:55 PM
2

No I don’t think my value is what a man decides regardless of whether I’m in a relationship or not Then you don't know the meaning of value, and you are talking of an entirely different concept, that you capriciously want to call "value" The value of anything is what the consumer is willing to pay. You cannot decide that "the value of this potato is a million dollar", when nobody wants to pay a million dollar for it. Your value is how much other people values you, and nothing else, because that'…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 02:52 PM
6

So wait - a woman needs to be with a man to be a good person? Lmfaooo... so you’re a hardcore misogynist huh? That's a strawman. She doesn't "needs a man" to be a good person. Shoe WOULD HAD a man if she were a good person. What is women don’t exist just for men? What if we are our own people? Then get out of here. We are here discussing relationships. In relationships, you do not decide your value. The other person decides. So your value is whathever men decide.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 11:33 AM
2

“Any single woman at 30 obviously is not a good person” That’s a pretty big generalization. And that's an irrelevant argument. The only relevant thing is that a man has to care for his own well being, and avoiding old women is a really effective rule for life. ​ Your argument is "needle in a haystack". No men should plan his life depending on finding needles in haystacks. That's a recipe for failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 11:29 AM
1

Right so 30+ year old men should be snooping around highschools trying to get with barely legal girls.. sounds..interesting :p Exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 11:23 AM
17

No self respecting man is supposed to be dating a 30 year old woman. ​ A 20 year old is always better. ​ Any woman single at 30, obviously is not a good person, or she would not be dating at that age. Neither she is attractive as a 20 year old. ​ Even worse, that woman trying to "convince" men to disregard their best interest, only for her benefit, is a manipulative woman, which is a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 10:22 AM
1

to have a baby with a woman or to live with her You don't need joint accounts for that
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 10:18 AM
-1

The correct split is: ​ Father commands, everybody else obeys. ​ Whoever disagrees is free to leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 10:17 AM
0

The socialists were successful turning everybody into a victim, to collect their support for a socialist revolution. Women are just more prone to act as victims. ​ "women are victims of the patriarchy" "black are victim of white" "poor are victim of the rich" "LGBT are victim of cisgenders" "indigenous are victim of immigrants" "socialists are victims of capitalists" "unemployed are victims of free trade" "failed cultures are victims of eurocentrism" "germans are victims of jews"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 10:15 AM
1

The mistake was when you allowed the joint accounts
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 08:39 AM
0

You are extremely bad at explaining what you want to ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 10:32 PM
1

Marriage itself is wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 10:15 PM
2

The FDS is as cringy as an incel forum
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:49 PM
1

There are two types of women: pretty and pleasant, and the ones that men don't care at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:30 PM
2

The anti-abortion bunch does not comes from the Red Pill, but from religion. ​ It is very common to find religious men on the RP, because religion deeply brainwashes people into the BP, so the more "righteous" dudes, tend to be the most failed. They arrive to the RP after searching for answers, and then try to hammer the BP into the RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 07:57 AM
1

Women enter transactional LTR post wall, out of fear of being left alone, after they realize, or fear that they have lost their beauty (alpha's interest). ​ Transactional LTR (not necessarily includes sex) exploits the blue pill belief that attraction can be negotiated, so women start demanding from the man to "do his part", but the woman never feels paid, so she keeps demanding more, and more and more, and the more they get, the more frustrated they feel, so they start resenting and mistreating…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 07:55 AM
1

Plenty of things go outside of evolution. Cities, ships in space. Humans make all kinds of unnatural things - something no other animal does. That's off topic
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 07:44 AM
1

Again: if you don’t want women to dress up for you, that’s fine, but don’t pretend that you don’t value it when you do. You should focus on your reading comprehension rather than on your looks. Being insufferable is much worse than looking scruffy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 05:58 PM
1

Any single woman "over 26" is a leftover. If she had value, she would had been taken already. ​ There is no upside. She is past her prime, and she gave the best of her life to another man. ​ You are second class, beta, just for wasting your time thinking about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 05:55 PM
1

Something essential you never understood about the red pill, -you really, really, really don't get it-, is that you cannot negotiate desire. ​ You never got it. You still believe that when you talk to a woman you are negotiating desire. ​ Attraction is a feeling. Attracting a woman is like making a person laugh. You do not make an agreement to get the laugh. You make them laugh. ​ It is YOU who make them laugh. ​ It is YOU who make a woman feel things. ​ The woman does not gives sex to you, you …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 05:30 PM
0

We weren’t talking romantic relationships specifically, but sure: if you’re ok with women coming to dates with no makeup, wearing cargo shorts and a wrinkly T-shirt, and you want a partner who will be dedicated to her career first rather than the family, kudos to you. You are widely misinterpreting what I said. What I mean is that all investment you put on your appearance is for your own interest, and I owe you nothing at all for it. You do not do it for me. I will give you nothing in return. Ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 04:58 PM
1

The very concept of dating is wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 09:17 AM
4

Because is the natural way humans work. ​ Marriage is an artificial construct. It is anti natural. ​ You are wrongly taught that marriage is a contract between man and woman, but that's a lie. ​ Marriage is a contract between men. It is a property contract: "this woman is mine, and that woman is yours". ​ Marriage exists because it reduces violence. Men are mortal enemies to each other, because men are competitors. ​ Women ally against men, because becoming pregnant does not impedes another woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 08:55 AM
1

What you are doing here is to dishonestly present you as a "nice boy", and that's your "game". ​ You are doing "virtue signalling", and you are as dishonest as you are claiming to not be.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 08:22 AM
3

The only thing that matters is evolution. ​ A slut is to be liked only to have sex with her, because that's an evolutionary opportunity to make a baby. ​ A slut causes disgust on men as a LTR, because she costs money, and causes the man to risk being cuckolded. ​ Being cuckolded causes the man to be impeded of having his own children, wasting his resources favoring a competitor. ​ Feeling disgust to being cuckolded is good for men, and has absolutely nothing to do with religion. It benefits men,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 08:03 AM
1

the gender that is so selfcentered they frequently argue that women owe men sex or relationships,because of men being 'nice That's not the Red Pill. Those are the "nice boys", and feminists are the ones brainwashing them into believing that they will get sex in exchange for being "nice"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 07:58 AM
1

Worse is, men end up paying most of it afterward. Only simps pay. And those same women punish them for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 07:56 AM
1

Well we learn from the best showcasers of selfishness :) the gender that is so selfcentered they frequently argue that women owe men sex or relationships,because of men being 'nice' - as if a nice person would expect sex for being a basic human being!!! I'm an individual not a "gender". Reducing people to a group, is the definition of hate speech and discrimination, taken from the criminal handbook of socialism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 07:55 AM
2

Imagine men being so self-centered that they are unaware that many workplaces have dress codes that require makeup and heels for women. We are talking about romantic relationships here. If you go to a date, and blame the man for your dress code at your awful work, you are an awful person, and deserve the worst. If you don’t want women to put on makeup and dress up, stop choosing and elevating women who use makeup and dress up. Stop telling me what to do. I do not owe you anything for your make u…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 07:52 AM
1

Transhumanism goes outside of the boundaries of evolution Nothing goes outside of evolution
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 07:48 AM
1

Victim BP attitude: I have no arguments, so you bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 02:38 PM
15

Women are so self centered that they frequently argue that men owe women something for women using make up, and spending a lot of money on their looks. ​ The purpose of make up is to cheat a man into believing that the woman is prettier than she really is. It is deceitful, and still those women demand things in exchange. ​ Imagine if men were demanding to be paid and recognized for lying to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 02:36 PM
6

Most of the hate, buthurtism and resentment comes from the cover contract caused by the assumption of what the rules are. ​ Long time ago, socialist beta males decided "those will be the rules", with total ignorance about human nature. And that's why those rules don't work. They are ideological. ​ People has been taught those fake rules of the game, and they feel rage and indignation at discovering that they wasted their life effort on a contract that nobody else abides for. ​ When you see someb…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 07:29 AM
1

The problem is that I notice that at the absolute top levels of attractiveness, even the young women opt for the money dude. Jeff Bezo's wife didn't cared when she ran to the hills with half of Jeff money.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 07:20 AM
1

Absolutely not. The most important factor is to be alpha. ​ Money helps, but it may be a curse if used wrongly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 07:03 AM
2

Women function on two levels: the disguise, and the raw animal mode. ​ The disguise is the character they are acting in front of people. It conforms to the social norms. ​ The animal mode emerges when the woman is controlled by feelings, and his purpose is to override the character and social norms. ​ Women have different levels of awareness of the difference between their disguise, and the real animal inside. ​ Many women are totally oblivious to it, to the point of believing that they are the …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 06:59 AM
1

if you are just looking for sex with hot women, money beats everything else easy. Yea, it is called prostitution. You do not need any theory or argumentation about prostitution. It is the simplest thing on earth. The OP is not talking about prostitution, but about a male mindset. The male mindset of "I have to demonstrate", becomes from low self esteem, and conveys low value. That's why feminists are always telling women lies like "you are the best", "believe that you are the queen". Women perce…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 06:46 AM
1

Which is why it needs to be circumvented. You can't circumvent evolution Evolution is the result, whatever you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 06:23 AM
1

Although I find rap disgusting, if a rapper is famous, he doesn't needs to spend any money to get women. ​ If he's spending money, then he's worse than a poor man doing the same. ​ You pay for things you do not deserve. If you pay for any woman, you are revealing that you do not deserve her. ​ That's why many rich dudes crash and burn after showing all their wealth to a woman. She perceives him to be trying too hard, which is incongruent with being alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 05:47 PM
1

Rock stars wear tight pants and guy liner -and they're swimming in pussy. Only because they are rock stars
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 01:00 PM
0

Men should always go for younger women. It is not an "if"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 12:44 PM
1

why do you want to date someone better looking than you (stacies/chads)? People does not chooses what they are attracted to. ​ You are asking why people is attracted to attractive things, and that's an absurd question.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 12:42 PM
1

Evolution is pathetic and the solution Evolution doesn't require solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 12:40 PM
2

The actual move is monkey branching. Hypergamy is what motivates monkey branching.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 09:30 AM
3

This doesn't really make sense to me because women who marry at 30+ are the least likely to cheat and divorce of all women.. Unfounded claim
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 09:27 AM
3

Can’t women turn around and say that men settle because they can’t get the types of women they see in porn? Yes, and that does not erases the existence of hypergamy. ​ Is not a matter of tit for tat
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 09:21 AM
3

That's a stupid question. “Would you prefer your woman as she is today or $1m dollars richer?” Every man would want that extra million. Why turn down 100% upside? A stupid question for a woman, but men are different. Many men would prefer a woman as poor as possible, because a woman is attracted to men better than herself. The more equal, the less valuable is the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 09:11 AM
0

Evolution is pathetic and nature deserves to be circumvented This is not the church. Don't introduce creatinism here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 09:07 AM
2

Since the beginning of sexual reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 09:05 AM
0

Hypergamy was not invented by men at all. It was created by evolution, and is necessary for the betterment of humanity. Hypergamy just means that women try to make the best humans they can, by choosing the best fathers. not even TRP can agree on what “better” means And that’s a positive aspect of TRP. studies on metrics that we can quantify, like education and income, show that women increasingly marry down Lies. -Since you can’t define what “better” is, and you are not entitled to decide it, yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 08:51 AM
1

I know 25 year olds with better jobs than people twice their age. It isn’t unheard of. 25 is no more a young woman
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 04:59 AM
2

There is no one "men" group. ​ Alphas are on a completely different situation than betas. ​ Polygamy and hypergamy benefit alphas, and damage betas. ​ It is absurd to talk of "men" as a group. That's groupthink, and it reveals your broken formation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/20 09:56 AM
0

No young woman is "well established on her career"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/20 09:50 AM
1

I have cheated before but I promise you it was completely unrelated to my past promiscuity. I know virgins who’ve cheated in their marriages and promiscuous girls remaining loyal through and through. Any woman making excuses for cheating is a woman that makes excuses to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/20 09:32 AM
2

A woman who does not "understands" why promiscuity matters, is a woman who will cheat, cuckold a man, and still pretend to not "understand" why promiscuity matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 07:48 AM
3

Because men are taught a fantastic unreal concept of what love is. ​ That concept is rooted on catholic religion, (even if the man is an atheist and is not conscious of it), which is based on guilt and duty. ​ Men are educated on "rules for life". They have to follow the rules, and everything will fall naturally on his place, because magic. ​ As consequence, men expect the woman to love them for no reason, unconditionally, and forever, like a mom loves his son. ​ Men are taught that they have to…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 07:43 AM
1

When women hear "looks is not everything", they take it as "looks are not necessary and can be replaced with other things" ​ When a man says "looks is not everything", the man means "I take looks for granted, and want also other things"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 07:31 AM
0

When a woman says "average", she means the average guy of the group she is interested on. ​ If women are only attracted to the top 20% of men, then "average", is the top 10% ​ When feminist complain about "men", they only talk about alphas; the average alpha. Beta men do not even exist on her mind. ​ Just days ago, we argued about a woman simply declaring that the average man is only the one tallest than the average height. In other words, she considered the 75% as average, and had not enough br…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 07:15 AM
1

This is a total misunderstanding of female nature. ​ Women do not have personalities. Only dresses. ​ The same woman can act like the prude at one second, and the whore at the next. ​ Women do not think "I have this personality", but "this is the character I build to this people", and "this is the character I build to those other". ​ When a woman faces a man, the question on her mind is "what character should I play on this case?". She expects the man to set the rules. That's what annoys a woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 09:05 AM
4

Is not necessary to guess, because it is already happening. ​ The majority of Gen Z males crash and burn at relationships, and the young girls are desperate for every drop of manhood. ​ Also, those girls are more socially inept due to their lack of social interaction, since they relate to other humans by phone. ​ As consequence, the youngest generation is the easiest to pick, and the most useless to keep. ​ All that brainwashing about genre ideology made them totally confused about their own ide…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 08:18 AM
6

How do you feel about this concept? I feel a deep feeling of cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 08:10 AM
1

Breathing is even worse. If you dare to not do it, you are totally killed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 08:03 AM
1

Your relationship has absolutely nothing to do with her dad. Any argument in contrary is an excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 08:01 AM
6

Because everything revolving around anything starts and ends with sex ​ Reproduction is the reason for which any living being exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 04:52 AM
13

Consoles are garbage. An RTX 3080Ti would be a much better gift. ​ But seriously, if you try to buy affection with gifts, you are broken.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 04:49 AM
1

If monogamy were natural, it would not had to be forced by laws and social pressure. ​ The only reason for which monogamy is hated, is because the majority of men become losers without monogamy, and women had been taught that they can loot a scarce alpha male only for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 06:06 AM
1

No. Any 30+ man that has problems dating younger women, has problem dating any woman in general. It is not because of his age.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 06:03 AM
0

All birth control with hormones make women more masculine, and more insufferable. ​ Even DIU with hormones.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 05:58 AM
1

No, that's your projection on to me No. That's what YOU SAID ​ YOU SAID "Is there any way to structure a society so that men and women pair up up and down the WMV hierarchy and both partners are truly attracted to each other sexually? Not necessarily the MOST attracted to one another, but still attracted." ​ YOU ARE SAYING that each people should be paired with people of his own market value. ​ You do not want people paired up or down. ​ That goes against people's will, so you want to take away …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 05:56 AM
1

PS: it's weird to see you accusing me of hate speech then say I'm a nazi two sentences below. You need to moderate yourself. ​ Let's see if you agree with Hitler: ​ Hitler quotes: “The hammer will once more become the symbol of the German worker and the sickle the sign of the German peasant.” – May 1, 1934, May Day speech in Berlin “National Socialism derives from each of the two camps the pure idea that characterizes it, national resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 05:31 AM
1

I didn't write any "argument" about inherited wealth, I just corrected your definition of wealth. How many times do I have to repeat this? I never said I want to abolish inheritance. Yes, you did You keep saying that wealth is the product of being useful to society, but in a capitalist society, what determines your wealth gains is the market, not the people. The market is the people. When you buy an orange, you are the market. When you accept a wage for your labor, you are the market. ​ Hating t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 05:31 AM
1

So, it's speculation based on factors that are "not entirely known." Fair enough. I can't say I never do the same thing myself. So, don't come here pretending to tell other people what makes a man an alpha
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 04:38 AM
1

You make the garbage argument of "unfalsifiability fallacy" ​ Your argument can be used to claim exactly the contrary of what you claim, or anything, and THAT MAKES YOUR ARGUMENT WORTHLESS. ​ Well perhaps I’m not, but I’ve been sexually successful, I have a gd reputation, confindent & am able to find steady and living partners. I don’t need a script to be able to interact with my peers & potential lovers. And I once raised an airbus A380 with my dick
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 10:10 AM
1

Where did I say that? Your argument about inherited wealth is not yours. Is the socialist argument to impede children to inherit wealth. You said 200k is nothing, I said it isn't because other people don't have that. I.e. Bezos inherited a lot of money. I.e. wealth doesn't come to those whose parents didn't already have it. Is a false argument, because he could had got a loan, a mortgage, or investors. That his own parents were investors is anecdotal and irrelevant. You keep assuming that wealth…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 09:57 AM
3

Because some lesbians convinced socialists to use LGBT for the advancement of socialism, with the argument that socialists agree that all people should be the same. Socialists bought the argument, only for the advancement of socialism, and don't really care at all about women or LGBT. ​ Actually, socialists believe that by pushing the feminist and LGBT agenda, they will destroy liberal societies. ​ www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoRn4trj7MI ​ That's why you see the LGBT people carrying Che Guevara t-sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 07:15 AM
0

Alpha behavior is not caring what others think & not needing validation. No. ​ Alpha males are the males who are sexually successful with women. ​ Tbh most guys on trp are low tier betas or they wouldn’t need strategies & scripts to get anywhere. And that's why they look at alphas, trying to learn from them. ​ You are not an alpha, so your opinion is worthless. ​ You belong to the large number of people who attempts to redefine alpha to cheat those men into becoming betas. We had seen your kind …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 07:07 AM
0

Well to me alpha is a man who doesn’t give a flying fuck what others think & pursuits what he wants. I find nothing more attractive than a man compfortable in his sexuality & desires. Irrelevant. You do not define who is alpha
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 06:44 AM
2

Expecting to be chosen for your beauty is a feminine trait. ​ Women wait for men to approach and take the initiative. So women strategy is to make themselves as pretty as possible, being passive, waiting and hoping to be chosen by an alpha male. ​ What you are doing is feminine, and extremely unattractive. ​ If your plan is to be passive and be approached or chosen by a woman, even an ugly one, you life plan is totally broken.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 06:38 AM
1

No. Norway and Qatar are richer than the USA. Norway scores between the highest on the Index of Economic Freedom ​ Qatar is not far.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 06:20 AM
0

the best males aren't (edit : no male is) trustworthy enough to put my entire existence and my future kids' in their hands Life is hard, and ungrateful. No free ponies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 06:16 AM
1

How about we give that nothing to everyone in the world? You want to ban parents from caring about their children. ​ Well I have news for you: we are all competitors on the genetic race. Caring for their own children is one of the strongest forces of human beings. You want to go against the fundamental human nature, and that's why ALWAYS socialism fails, crashes and burn. It is inhumane. ​ You do not deserve to be cared by other people's parents. If you are poorer, it is entirely your parent's f…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 06:12 AM
0

Would the evidence of my own experiences count for anything with you, or no? No. Your individual experience is absolutely meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 06:02 AM
1

Nobody chooses to be a fool. And nobody deserves to be exploited. Socialists do. They choose to be a fool, and to be exploited.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 05:59 AM
1

I hate to break it to you, that has basically already happened and has been the norm for most of recorded human history. But there is a difference between natural classes, and enforced classes. ​ It is fair that a doctor rises on the social scale, because he's saving lives. ​ It is unfair that a politician raises on the social scale by robbing people of his money, and putting it on his bank account, or gives it to people that does nothing. ​ It is fair that a man gets all the women, if all the w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 05:57 AM
1

Facts are never cynical. Stop crybabyng.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 05:49 AM
1

If a woman is free to choose a male, she chooses alphas, and the only point of choosing alphas is to make alpha babies. ​ It raises the percentage of alpha males on the population. ​ If a woman is forced to mate with a beta male, it creates more beta males, and raises the percentage of beta males on the population. ​ Legal and religious enforced monogamy distributed women between beta males, against female will. The purpose of those laws was to get the support of beta males, for the state and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 05:47 AM
1

LGBT are never alphas. ​ The concept of alpha is only about a man to woman heterosexual relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 05:33 AM
1

This is however impossible in any system that is even slightly democratic. The number of women voting in their interest and simps will always win over men voting in their interests. Democracy is not the dictatorship of the majority. ​ But that's beyond the point. States are always slow, inefficient, and incompetent. Private enterprise is always one step forward. ​ All rules have holes. ​ You are thinking like a socialist, when you assume that a system has to be made from the state. Liberals mini…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 05:32 AM
2

Sex is the only ting that can bond a woman, and that's not even guaranteed. ​ That's why there is no return from promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:55 AM
4

This is the problem in a nutshell. Men are expected to comply. Some users in this subreddit have theorized that the future will see greater taxation for single men and financial communion rules to loosen up even without marriage. That's why is up to men to create untaxable systems. Tax=socialism
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:49 AM
3

Unfortunately there are too many desperate betabux who have no self respect. Like drones, they serve a purpose. Who else the alphas would cuckold otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:45 AM
1

Many certainly are -- and they agree to this voluntarily. A fool is born every second. Those who choose to be fools, deserve to be exploited.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:43 AM
1

Is there any way to structure a society so that men and women pair up up and down the WMV hierarchy and both partners are truly attracted to each other sexually? Not necessarily the MOST attracted to one another, but still attracted. That would be to divide society in classes, and segregate them based on genetics. ​ A non top woman would have no chance to even share an alpha. ​ Liberty is the only reasonable choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:41 AM
-1

So ladies better get that education and career. You're going to need it. There is no choice, but that does not makes those women more attractive, and does not refutes that younger women are more attractive. ​ After a woman wasted hey youth getting a career, she lost her best chance with the best males. ​ Life is hard, and ungrateful. No free ponies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:25 AM
6

Nothing is "unreasonable". ​ Every person chooses the best for himself. Every person is free to choose his path. ​ The best for a man is to avoid LTR with promiscuous women. A man has to care for his own interest. Nobody else will do. ​ The best for a woman may be to marry an alpha male, and have his kids, and yet that makes her the worst choice for any other male. ​ What is "reasonable" for a woman does not justify ruining another man's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:18 AM
1

Your argument about inheritance is based on envy. No, it's based on facts. Except it's arguably wrong, because iirc the consensus is that around 40% of wealth is inherited so not most. (But the number is debatable). The consensus is not the facts. Also, it is not the consensus. You want to justify robbing other people's money I didn't justify anything, I merely dejustified what you said. Also, all money is made by the state. It's only worth something because it has the signature of the treasure …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:10 AM
1

And not in a fair world neither. We live in the real world, where, the more liberal is a society, the more rich and successful it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:02 AM
0

Look at old national geographic pictures of hunter gatherer tribes and there's still plenty of weird looking motherfuckers. How the hell do pygmies even exist if hypergamy is so powerful? Learn about theory of evolution
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 06:01 AM
1

Are submissive males in bdsm really beta tho? They're probably getting laid more than most men. Just being involved in bdsm itself seems alpha to me. LGBT are highly involved in BDSM, and it doesn't makes them alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 05:59 AM
1

Whats more alpha than being so comfortable in your sexuality you can freely express your desires? You cannot define what is alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 05:57 AM
2

The alpha male/ beta male dichotomy is bad science from a study on (exclusively) male wolves in captivity The alpha male is a red pill concept. Is only an analogy compared to wolves. ​ Alpha male are the men that women prefer to have sex. Actual sex. ​ Since women have preferences for certain men over others, it is a mathematical certainty that alpha males exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 05:57 AM
1

If it is a myth, why are there so many leaders who visit a dominatrix? First, alpha is not equal to a leader. Some leaders may be gay Some leaders are women. Picking some leaders doesn't mean anything even about "leaders in general".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 05:54 AM
0

A man being sexually submissive doesn't make him a "beta male" outside the bedroom. Far from. An unfounded claim
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 05:52 AM
1

It shows that most men are not natural “alphas.” As the red pill says
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/20 05:51 AM
1

​That's a nice theory, but not how it works in practice. First, inheritance is the main source of wealth. And your idea that things are fair if and only if money is given voluntarily is impossible to define properly. Imagine a world in which the only source of food is a magical apple tree (which produces vast quantities of apples all year round). Someone happens to own it, which basically means that some soldiers obeying to him are protecting it. That guy can propose exchanges of whatever he wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 01:22 PM
1

God, I'd love to see what would happen if women walked away from their emotional leeches en masse. The fallout would be hilarious. Especially here. Sure. Now, stop wasting my time. You are not bringing anything useful to the argumentation
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 01:09 PM
1

Just walk away, and stop wasting other people's time
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 12:44 PM
1

Automod
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 12:42 PM
2

Ah yes, and a YouTube video of some schmoe is your "evidence", why am I not surprised? Nobody said that it is evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 12:41 PM
13

If that were true, it would imply that there are many more beta males than alpha males.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 12:40 PM
1

We do not live in a magical world of magical trees.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 12:33 PM
2

Suppose you have a roommate who leaves messes all over and never cleans. If they start doing their share of the housework, why should they expect anything return? If you do not like it, you can leave. If you do not want to leave, he's doing enough, and you should be tankful. It is hard enough to find someone you don't want to leave. If he isn't enough for you, he will never be enough, no matter how much "emotional labor" you want him to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 12:30 PM
2

Why would you expect anything in exchange? Why you expect something in exchange for nothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 06:41 AM
1

If women are denied, instead of just walking away they often go into a narcissistic rage and then get away with it. It's called female privilege. The woman does not walks away before she "gets away with it". She walks away AFTER she "gets away with it". It's called being with a beta male.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 06:40 AM
1

When somebody claims that "society is declining", ask them "define decline". ​ Most of the time, he will list reasons for demanding that the entirety society has to change to fix his own personal problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 05:26 AM
1

the problem they're trying to point out is that often men don't feel comfortable opening up If somebody doesn't feel comfortable with you, it is entirely your fault, not "men's fault". ​ You aren't a trustworthy person.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 05:21 AM
0

It's reasonable to expect reciprocity from a partner when you help them when they're down If you stay on that relationship, is because you value what your partner is giving to you, more than what you are spending for it. ​ That's the reciprocity you get, and all you deserve. You don't deserve an inch more. ​ If you do not find that "reciprocity" valuable, you are free to walk away. If you value the relationship so much that you do not want to end it, you are getting more than enough payment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 05:18 AM
6

They want men to be able to talk about their problems Men also want things. For example all men want an harem. ​ Wanting things is not an excuse to demand it to be given. ​ If you ask anything and it is denied, you are free to walk away. It is called negotiation. You do not set the price. The price is agreed, and if you do not agree, go looking for another deal. If you agree, that's the fair price. If the other person does not agrees, what you are offering is not as valuable as you pretend. ​ An…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 05:02 AM
0

In exchange for what?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 04:58 AM
-2

Those of us who make money are all forced to give away money and it’s not robbery it’s taxes.... Taxes IS robbery. Nobody pays taxes voluntarily. Taxes are charged at point of gun. I also don’t agree that “your work is always paid fairly on the free market” although that’s pretty ambiguous so maybe you could explain. Would you voluntarily pay for anything if you do not find the expense justified? You would only pay a wage to somebody, if you get a benefit. ​ If you do not get a benefit, then it …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 04:41 AM
5

Yes, but no. ​ The percentage of undesirable males is higher than it should be, due to centuries of breeding beta males, by enforced monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 02:51 AM
4

The 80/20 is a natural product of evolution. ​ Women select alpha males, because the women that don't do it, get extinct. ​ Any other argument is beating around the bush.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 02:49 AM
-2

Wealth is something every person gains out of what they do for the rest of society. ​ The only fair and ethical way of wealth accumulation is when you are VOLUNTARILY given money in exchange for what you give to others. ​ If you do not get paid VOLUNTARILY, in exchange for what you do, you do NOT DESERVE the money. ​ The woke discourse is just the typical, elaborated, socialist justification to PRACTICE ROBBERY, taking the money other people made by giving goods and services to the rest of the p…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 02:44 AM
3

Even the American Psychological Association is today an unscientific, politically motivated woke and socialist activist organization. ​ www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d_5gzsflcc ​ That's why all your links are worthless. ​ One common, unscientific thing they do, is to take lesbian women behavior, and just say "women do".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 02:30 AM
3

A 30 year old woman is an universe of difference compared to the 18 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 05:04 PM
2

Not a smart choice for a profile
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 04:58 PM
3

If you want to attract a horde of beta males, all you have to do is to not be morbidly obese, have more than one leg, and less than 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 04:47 PM
1

not something that is a weak opener to hitting on someone Quite the contrary. That's the only practical use of a compliment. ​ A compliment delivered with a tone of "hey, how are you doing", is a good opener. ​ It has to be delivered with the attitude of "I don't really care", and "I don't mean it". ​ The problem with compliments arise when the complimenter is expecting to get something in exchange. A typical mistake is to tell a compliment and stop, expecting the person to feel attracted, or to…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 04:30 AM
1

There is a pernicious myth that believes that complimenting people is conducive to initiation of romantic relationships. ​ It isn't. ​ One of the first things that PUA teach is to stop complimenting women. Complimenting women is an instant turn down for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 09:01 PM
0

None of your arguments refute what I said. ​ Also, the argument of violence caused by polygyny is false. It is a typical case of "correlation does not meant causation". ​ You are also arguing that "polygyny families aren't stable because people outside of it are violent"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 08:49 PM
1

It is an argument. Define “young”. Young is younger than 23
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 02:55 PM
8

You're engaging in one of the main TRP defenses, glorifying martyrdom, being prosecuted but woke victim. That's an ad hominem fallacy, which is rooted on the hate speech concept of "toxic masculinity". ​ You are pushing the woke hate speech discourse, and using the woke manipulation of accusing others of the misdeed you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 02:51 PM
-1

The Mormon have like 10 wives, and are stable. ​ Muslims have stable families.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 02:28 PM
3

No. ​ Nobody needs to change for your own benefit. ​ You are the one with problems. ​ You are authoritarian, and you believe that other people has to bend below you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 10:32 AM
69

The people who needs to be protected from the truth, is either too immature, or too damaged to be allowed to get out of a mental hospital. ​ For the rest, life is hard. ​ The fault of the "stressing and demoralization" is on the people who lied to them, not the ones who tell the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 10:23 AM
1

You are either a liar, or the worst student in the class.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 10:15 AM
11

Imagine an alpha male with 6 women thinking "I need to get rid of my sperm. I'm going to drive one hour to fap on a cold laboratory". The rich man on his mansion: "I need 10 dollars. I'm going to sell my load".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 05:30 AM
1

Organisms compete to propagate what makes themselves different form other organisms. That's the same if it is their entire DNA, or a single molecule. ​ If an organism has a single molecule to propagate, non present on any mate, then it needs to make more children, because each child has only a 50% chance of inheriting his DNA. ​ You have not the slightest idea on how DNA works. ​ No organism ever thinks "I have to propagate my DNA". Men do not feel aversion to being cuckolded because men think "…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 05:23 AM
2

While hybristophilia presents overwhelmingly in women relative to men, I am not sure you could use that to paint a broad picture of the nature of women. "hybristophilia presents overwhelmingly in women relative to men" scientifically demonstrates that female attraction to violent males is statistically significant. I am not sure you could use that to paint a broad picture of the nature of women. That's a vague statement, not really saying anything concrete. You are trying to imply something, bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 05:11 AM
1

No argument. ​ Pretty and young is good enough. The girl is not weird. ​ Also, no pretty and young girl makes 85,000 a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 04:30 AM
-1

Families with an alpha male and many women are super stable families.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 04:24 AM
7

On this victim culture, any minor annoyance is declared "abusive"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 04:21 AM
1

No. The problem is a complete misunderstanding of the sexual ritual. ​ Society has been brainwashed into believing that women "select" males who play a passive role. ​ The reality is that men seduce women. Because men fail to do it, and women are expected to have an active role they can't play, it is that relationships fail. ​ Women cannot pick a man remotely. It does not works that way. Women cannot take the initiative. It doesn't works. Women cannot be "equal". Women demand leadership.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 04:18 AM
-1

That's because female low n-count was considered a value that the rapist ruined, aggravating the damage to the woman. So a promiscuous woman didn't had that much damage. Now that the low n-count is not an politically correct value, rape has to be a less grave crime than at those times.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 04:11 AM
3

The funny thing is that so many women reject a lot of "not good enough" men, and when reaching the end of their fertile life, recourse to sperm donors, which are the worst beta losers than ever existed, even incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 04:07 AM
1

Sperm donors do it for money because they aren't the best DNA around.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:47 AM
1

That's false, because You are not the only carrier of your DNA. 98% of your DNA is carried by chimpanzees, so every human alive carries more than 98% of your own DNA. ​ Your argument is totally bogus, not because of chimpanzees, but because you have not the slightest idea of what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:45 AM
1

Calling something "just another number" is meaningless, and only used as a fallacious argument to avoid considering the facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:33 AM
1

Faith means unjustified. ​ It is absurd to have unjustified beliefs or expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:27 AM
1

the chick working at the call center making 350 dollars a week demanding a middle class dude is weird She is not weird at all. The weird one is the one making 85,000 a year. "chick working at the call center" only needs to be pretty and younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:23 AM
0

I only see this not happening if ALL women got into the workplace Facts: Most women are already on the workplace Facts: Most women remain single forever
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:20 AM
1

"friendship" destroys romantic relationships. ​ Women don't want "friends". ​ Friends and love are polar opposites. ​ If you want to be "friend", you are asking to live on the friendzone.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:16 AM
5

This is the attempt N° 2 billion of "society needs to be fixed for my own benefit". ​ "Is not me, is them"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:14 AM
1

That's because the beta males judge beauty as superior to them, and unreachable. ​ When you look worse, beta males hope, to be accepted, is higher. ​ "She isn't that pretty, I have a chance"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:08 AM
2

Barbarism is to distribute women between beta males regardless of what those women prefer.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:03 AM
6

A rose ? Killing the weaker male seals must be romantic in the primal brain And that's why women, and non men, have hybristophilia and Stockolm syndrome Hybristophilia is a paraphilia in which sexual arousal, facilitation, and attainment of orgasm are responsive to and contingent upon being with a partner known to have committed an outrage, cheating, lying, known infidelities, or crime—such as rape or murder. Stockholm syndrome has been defined as a condition in which hostages develop a psycholo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 03:59 AM
1

Decline for Rome lasted 1000 years, until Rome broke apart. ​ Let's wait some centuries before declaring the decline of an empire.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 05:55 AM
1

Why should a man or woman commit ? For no reason. Commitment is only necessary when people does not feels desire, and were is no desire, there is no point in commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 05:41 AM
4

Men pay for porn, not for books about the great career of a female CEO. ​ Most men choose a beautiful woman over a rich one. ​ When a man describes a woman to another man, he says "beautiful face, nice ass, boobs, eyes". No man says "she had a luis vuiton blouse, and an armani pret a porter". If he said that, the other man would have no clue about what it means, how it looks, or why he's told that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 05:36 AM
0

Breathing is important, but people doesn't go all day thinking "I now have to breathe. Now I have to breathe again". I want to travel to the Sahara desert, but I wonder if I will have enough oxygen there” Passing their genes is the main purpose of any male, it drives any man’s life, but it does not means that men are all day thinking “Now I have to do this to pass my DNA to the next generation”, “Now I have to procreate a baby”. It just means that men are programmed by nature to feel repulsion a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 05:21 AM
1

An opinion is NOT science, even if that opinion is written in a book.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 05:12 AM
1

like me basically don't exist in the RP framework They exist in the RP framework. The RP says "Women believe what they had been taught to believe, and/or talk they way thinks that will be socially acceptable, but they are ruled by their instinct, which overrides anything women believe or say, and after the fact, women make bullshit explanations and rationalizations, or plain lies" ​ That's why RP says "do never believe what a woman says. Believe what she does".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 05:09 AM
-1

Men here are mostly cynical Cynical = adult Non cynical = believes in pink unicorns
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 05:05 AM
1

Women believe that they have to belong to the same population than top alphas, to be eligible as an alpha partner, and for that, all women have to be the top social class. ​ That's why women demand privileges as just "asking for equality". ​ Note that the feminist discourse is "Messi (the world's top player) has a higher wage than women". They don't care that the majority of players get paid 0. They look at the top, and demand equality, to the top. ​ Feminists want to ignore that women work less…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 04:57 AM
1

I thought you said liberalism was much much better, and more suited to advanced societies, and produced the best outcomes, and was stronger... Liberalism is not just "better". Is the only thing that works. That does not prevent organized socialists from taking control of the public discourse, because the socialists, which were the underdog, realized that they had to fight the cultural battle, and liberals rested on the economic success. The socialist tactic is to pretend that they represent the …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 04:46 AM
2

Where has that happened? Everywhere. On most of the world, they are making laws were if a woman denounces a man for feeling any discomfort when a man talks to her, the man is automatically guilty of sexual offenses until proven innocent. The woman is the sole judge of what is wrongdoing, and what not. Even if she is proven to be malicious, and there is no penalty for lying. She may consider a gaze to be aggressive, any phrase to be a catcall. She is the only judge. That's why women are making fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/20 04:31 AM
2

Then why so many countries are making laws to jail men for the sole act of approaching women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/20 07:13 AM
1

Women face 2 problems. ​ One is that women are as clueless as beta males on how to approach another person and seduce them without creeping them out. ​ Most men want sex so much, that it may mislead women. Most men want sex, so it causes the wrong perception that the woman is a good seducer doing the easiest thing in the world, which is offering sex to a man Most men are betas, even the ones looking like alphas, so beta behavior may easily confuse women about the men women want. Approaching a be…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/20 07:09 AM
1

I'm NOT a comunism. Why would I like comunism? Because every one, each one of your arguments are taken from Marx. ​ The end of liberalism, how liberalism will destroy itself, the discourse against free trade. ​ You had been brainwashed by marxists. Marx starts by building a theory on how liberalism will destroy itself, leading to the socialist revolution, which you are repeating word by word. ​ Your entire discourse is textbook socialism. ​ You had been brainwashed. ​ All the universities in USA…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/20 06:40 AM
0

No, because if I cannot seduce a woman into having sex, that relationship will be a disaster. ​ If I an seduce her, I will have sex. I do not have any other motive to approach a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 06:41 AM
2

MGTOW is a vague, too broad thing. ​ It may mean a lot of different beliefs, concepts and attitude. ​ The ones that defend it, pick the things they find positive, and the ones who hate it, cherry pick the groups, people and things they find convenient. ​ Media is generally controlled by socialist dogma, it is tendentious, and talks about different things than many people that defends MGTOW. ​ So it is pointless to talk about MGTOW is such a vague terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 06:01 AM
1

Soros finances BLM, as he does with feminist agendas and all that, and he's not a "socialist". There is enough proof of this all over the fucking internet, and he doesn't even bother hidding this come on. He's the guy behind "The Economist", I mean... How "red" do you think Soros is? Soros is a socialist. The Economist used to be a liberal publication, until it was sold years ago. The point of BLM is to disintegrate society, and trigger the famous class struggle that Marx predicted, as the way o…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 05:25 AM
1

"Exactly as a machine does the work you don’t want to do, so you can get a better job, and be richer, because society is more productive." Damn, you could have a really good point there if it wasn't for the fact that automatation does produce more wealth but, actually, reduces wages by replacing workers. That’s a lie. The entire body of facts, since the industrial revolution, demonstrates that the more automated a society, the higher the wages of the entire population. ​ Now, if "wealth" is all …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 05:13 AM
1

market A market exchange is any voluntary exchange of valued things. The alternative of a market is an involuntary exchange, or slavitude. ​ Socialists demonize a virtuous thing that is the market, because socialists are dictatorial and criminal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 09:15 AM
1

That's an issue for the man, because he can't replace the woman. ​ He's low value, and can't keep the woman focused on himself. ​ Women are like working dogs. If you do not keep them entertained, they start chewing the sofa out of boredom.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 06:10 AM
4

There is no point in trying to fix society. ​ People who fail to reproduce will delete themselves from the genetic pool. The working ones will remain. ​ That's the way humanity fixes itself. ​ Trying to keep a broken machine working has no purpose. It only prolongs suffering. ​ The problem was caused by the fatal arrogance of people messing with the machinery. It failed, and that's the best outcome. Let it crash and burn.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 05:50 AM
3

This isn't a supermarket Yes, it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 05:33 AM
-2

Losers want people to not have standards, but still to be considered better than competitors. ​ Women that tell to men what men should prefer, are psychopathic abusers, pretending that other people doesn't have right to make his own choices. ​ If a person chooses you as partner because he doesn't has standards, then you aren't better than any other person, and can't pretend to enjoy his loyalty. He will cheat freely, even with worse people than you, since he doesn't has standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 05:32 AM
1

If you ask a FDS what a woman can do to keep an alpha. They have absolutely no clue.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 05:23 AM
1

Men and women are different, and value different things. That does not means that women do not value male beauty. It means that women value it less than men. Women have different interests and different priorities. That's why men spend money on porn, just to watch beauty women, and most women don't spend a cent on porn. Women spend fortunes on romantic novels, and men don't. A retarded woman would answer that a small percentage of women consume porn imaginery as much as men, and a small percenta…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 05:20 AM
1

No way FDS has "decoded men". They spend 99,99999% percent of his time complaining on how much failure they get. The FDS says nothing that a run of the mill feminazi magazine doesn't say.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 05:12 AM
0

Never said "is acceptable" I said the way it is. A shark is not acceptable or unacceptable. A shark is just a shark. I never said that "I come on top", but from your unfounded argument, I conclude that I are way smarter that you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 05:11 AM
2

Is controversial because people with small IQ confuses "don't matter equally" with "don't matter".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 05:09 AM
1

Beauty communicates babymaking capacity
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 05:04 AM
1

>"They do the jobs we don't want to do" is what a liberal (both free market and progressive narrative fan) would say. Exactly as a machine does the work you don’t want to do, so you can get a better job, and be richer, because society is more productive. The retardation of your argument is illustrated when a famous liberal visited China, and was shown a route being made with millions of workers with shovels. So the visitor asked “Why why are not using machines?” The answer was “Because that way …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 04:53 AM
1

>Sounds great until powerfull men start to mess with society's rules, laws, moral and common sense in order to "have their cake and eat it too". The ONLY thing that can stop a powerful man from abusing society is EQUALITY BEFORE LAW, also called liberalism. ​ The LAW IS THE ONLY POWER OF THE POWERLESS. That's why socialism is always about how to destroy the law, how to annihilate the Constitution, and how to deprive people of his life, liberty and property. ​ And socialism, is GUARANTEED to subd…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 04:52 AM
3

Some men, Red pillers, MGTOW and incels will use this data to point at a "problem with society". They will call the women "entitled". Those men are still on the rage phase, and still not red pilled. ​ Many men never escape the rage phase. ​ The red pill does not sees it as a "problem with society". Is not a problem. It is just human nature. ​ To depict it as a "problem with society" is a declaration of weakness, and expecting society to change to fix their personal problems. That's a feminine at…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 02:42 PM
2

Men were never shamed as sluts. But they were shamed as irresponsible and antisocial. ​ Of course alphas were resented by beta men, and still are resented today. Betas will always envy and resent alphas, because betas are the losers of a zero sum game. Example: Incels use the word "chad" as a derogatory term. ​ But shaming seducers has nothing to do with being a slut. ​ The sin of being a slut, is that for a man, a slut is a bad choice for commitment, because that man would be exploited, and he …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 02:24 PM
-1

I never wrote that Mr nevergotabrain
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 01:46 PM
1

You aren't worth explaining it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 01:46 PM
1

To make things short, liberalism doesn't work. Be it economically or culturally, it never ends in an "egualitarian utopia", becouse things tend to acumulate by the very nature if there is no intelligent congruence making possible order and fair distribution. ​ Liberalism doesn't pretend to pursue an "egualitarian utopia". Socialism does. ​ Socialism pretends that if one person works double than a lazy one, both should get the same wage. ​ Liberalism pretends that the person working double, is al…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 12:19 PM
1

If a person is racist, and the other person hides that his ancestors are mixed race, it should be a crime to lie? ​ The point is that criminalizing sexual lies is discrimination, and legalizing discrimination has no better ethics than lying for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 12:07 PM
0

It is up to every woman to be liked. ​ Is her responsibility to be likable.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 12:01 PM
1

Marry an incel. He would make tons of oxytocin. You can export oxytocin, and get rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 11:59 AM
1

Matematically, you mean median, not average. ​ On average. Men and women have the same ratio, because one alpha is averaged with 10 incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 11:58 AM
4

Women don't feel disgust at alpha males. They feel disgust at feeling not being enough for that male, and being discarded. ​ Men don't feel disgust at having sex with at slut. Men feel disgust at having a relationship with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 11:46 AM
2

Would both groups be considered sluts "Slut" is derogatory to women, but condecorative to men. ​ The reason for which being a "slut" is derogatory for women, is because it reduces their value to men. ​ If a man invest his resources on a slut, she will have a baby of another man, and becasue she can't have babies of many men simultaneously, that's a zero sum game for men. A baby of one man, is the failure of another man. ​ A slut is an existential risk for a man that is loyal to the slut. For tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 11:20 AM
4

Humans are product of millions of years of evolution. No human is designed "for western society". Western society doesn't control instinct. Women are attracted to alphas, no matter what "society" there is. Less than 10% of men are alphas, so the natural ratio, for which humans are designed, is that each alpha shares more than 10 women. The pretension of loyalty form an alpha, is the pretension that 9 out of 10 women have to fail and be left behind, sames as 9 out of 10 men are left behind. Human…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 10:58 AM
1

The Red Pill position, is that women are controlled by their feelings, and not by reason. ​ So there is no point in "convincing" a woman against her feelings. ​ A woman will love a man as long as she feels love. ​ A woman may logically understand why she has to behave in certain ways, but it will not change the way she feels. ​ That's the reason for which a man has to learn to inspire genuine desire, and men value low n-counts so much. ​ Genuine desire is inspired. It cannot be negotiated. It ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 10:42 AM
2

She and you are wrong in assuming that a man has to be "loyal"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 10:33 AM
7

extremely disappointed It means you are extremely bitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 10:28 AM
-1

Men are designed to spread their seed. It is a biological imperative. Men can't make babies. That's something women cannot understand. There is nothing wrong in men having multiple women. That's what humans are designed for.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 10:27 AM
8

Yes, she is wrong in her entitled implicit assumptions, which are rooted in that she deserves things instead of having to work for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 10:17 AM
8

If you want an alpha man to stay around, you have to make him want to stay around. ​ The pretension that a man has to love you for magical reasons is just a lie you were told. ​ It is up to you to make yourself loved. Is not a birthright. ​ You do not deserve anything. You only get what you work for, if you do a good work. ​ If you have no clue on how to inspire in a man that desire, it is not men's fault. The red pill exist, because men realized that men have to understand what women want, to m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 10:04 AM
1

The losers who don't know what I'm talking about never touched women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 09:43 AM
2

The book you need to read is "The black book of the new left", which sources, and cites the socialists intellectuals who designed the new communist strategy of using gender ideology as the new "class struggle". There is an awful English translation of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 08:12 AM
1

This account is temporary, so your gold would be lost anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 08:09 AM
0

Modern society doesn't change human nature. It does not changes DNA. ​ Your belief that "we would be worse" is unfounded. There is archeological evidence that before civilization humans had larger brains, and it was the alpha selection what converted animals into humans. ​ What caused the largest scientific and technological progress in humanity was capitalism, which is dependent of respecting human nature, and liberating humans from the authoritarian control of governments and religion. ​ Capit…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 07:57 AM
1

Yes. ​ But there is more. ​ A woman in a relationship always loose feelings for the man, and when she is bored, and no more feel love, she makes up some bullshit excuse to create conflict, like "I saw a spider yesterday, and it is your fault!" ​ All she wants at that point is attention, and the conflict is only to engage the man into the interaction. The WRONG reaction is: -To engage into a rational argument: "Spiders are chelicerae arachnid, and will not bite unless provoked" -To take it person…
/r/askTRP05/09/20 05:31 AM
0

The majority of men were supposed to die virgin, as most male mammals do. Only the alphas reproduce. ​ Governments and religion made monogamist rules, to distribute women between beta males, allowing beta male to reproduce (and reducing the general quality of men). ​ It ended with the invention of contraceptives, the sexual revolution, and women's rebellion against the horde of beta males. ​ Now society is returning to the natural equilibrium, where only alpha males reproduce. And that's good fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 02:54 AM
5

"Toxic masculinity" is hate speech against men. ​ After the fall of the Soviet Union, socialism realized that their discourse of "workers exploited by employers" failed. So they switched to "minority class exploited by majorities", and started a new hate speech tactic: ​ Creating conflicts between Men and women Whites and blacks Heterosexuals and LGBT Indigenous vs immigrants Muslim vs cristians Religious vs atheists TERF women vs communist feminists Any "oppressed" vs "oppressors", "victim" vs …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 02:47 AM
1

I don't have an issue with going straight up to a boy and saying something to the effect of, "you're really cute, I like you a lot" That's both masculine behavior and a common masculine mistake. Seduction is about making the other person feel pleasure, not about communicating information.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 02:11 AM
1

Looks matter is the truth. You want to ban the truth. ​ If the truth annoys you, move away to a place that makes you happier. ​ Liberty matters. Respect other people's liberty of telling the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 02:07 AM
1

Because people here doesn't like the truth, so they shadowban opinions they don't like. ​ Also other sites shadwoban people just for posting here.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 02:02 AM
1

taller then 5,7 Sorry, I didn't imagined you knowledge of mathematics and logic is at kindergarten level I explain to you: "Taller" means "above"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 01:56 AM
1

There is no point in that argument. ​ Men and women are not equal. ​ The man's age doesn't change the woman's age.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 01:42 AM
1

It doesn't change much, your still are roughly defining "average" as, "above average", and discarding half of the male population.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 10:06 PM
1

All reasons are looks related for what looks communicate. ​ To understand it, you have to understand that humans are designed to live semi naked on the African Savannah, not on modern civilization. What humans are will only change, by adaptation to civilization, in dozens of thousands of years. Modern inventions like contraceptives and paternity tests do not change at all how humans feel. ​ Men are involuntarily attracted to young women. Men have no choice in that. ​ Youth and beauty communicate…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 01:02 PM
1

The reason for human existence, and for any life's existence, is to propagate and evolve DNA. ​ Everything you do in life serves the purpose of propagating your DNA, whether you know it, or not, whether you like it or not, whether you accept it or not. ​ The only exception is when your DNA is broken, which happens because DNA is purposely an imperfect machine. Some people's DNA makes them to be gay, or to get cancer, or to get an extra head, but even that "malfunction" serves the purpose of prop…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 12:23 PM
1

First: telling people to not objectify anything, or anybody, is objectifying that person, because that deprives that person of this human liberty to do whatever he wants. ​ If YOU do no like another person objectifying anything, that's YOUR problem. You are the authoritarian pretending to impose YOUR DUBIOUS MORALS on other people, and that's inherently violent. ​ men cannot avoid objectifying women, because seeing attractive women activates the tool manipulation area of the male brain. That's n…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 09:54 AM
0

Dating is the single largest error of beta males. ​ Dating communicates "I'm so low value relative to you, that I have to put a huge lot of effort" That alone disqualifies the suitor: the mere fact that he's a suitor. ​ The alpha way to get sex is to seduce immediately, and take the woman to bed. If it doesn't work, next the woman, and start again with a new one. ​ If a man cannot inspire genuine desire in a woman, any relationship is doomed from the start.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 09:42 AM
1

In order to be an average man, literally the only thing you have to do is be taller then 5,7 You are defining "average" as "above average". In other words, you said "only top men are average"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 09:31 AM
1

Alpha males are the big winners. Alphas never had so many women available, and open to sex. Beta males the big losers. Some like 30% would die virgin, and the rest have scarce sex, and only get the spoilers. ​ Women won because they got the liberty of having more sex with alphas, as their insctinct (sorry, I mean "feelings") mandate, and also lost because most women will never be romantically fulfilled. ​ With time women will resign to be single mothers, and to share alphas, as nature dictates..…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 08:50 AM
1

How can we make sure he is alpha bucks rather than beta bucks? If he makes her feel sexual desire, and takes her to bed, he's alpha up to that point. To be a real alpha she has to keep feeling desire for him long term. ​ Anything else is beta. ​ Q2: Is it advisable to find an alpha bucks? You don't find an alpha. The alpha finds you, if you are lucky enough. That's why women take so much care of their appearance, all the time. ​ Q3: What are the definitions of an alpha bucks? There is no definit…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 03:03 AM
5

>Ok, you can come at me with your hypergamy whatever. End of the day if a good woman loves a good man then there likely will be no cheating. There is not such a thing as a “good woman” or a “good man”. There are humans. You are no authority to dictate who is a “good person”. >Also, a young virgin should not be the ideal partner. Cakes and puppies should grow on trees and be free, but they don’t. >An ideal partner is […] That’s YOUR taste on “ideal partners”. You have zero authority telling other…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 02:27 AM
1

Who is the most selfless man? A slave. Who is the most egotistical man? An emperor. ​ All women would choose an emperor over a slave. ​ Same as Hollywood, and most universities, the "British Journal of Psychology" had been taken by socialists, and the no more have any scientific validity. ​ They promote those ideas, because they need slaves. Women are disgusted by slaves, because "selfless" societies all failed. ​ Every socialist state failed catastrophically. The soviet union, the nazi Germany,…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 12:24 PM
1

Why would my friends disrespect my choice? They probably might express concerns only if I choose some abjectively bad man, like drug addictict or criminal. or a manwhore. Which hasn't happened Don't change my words. I never said that your friends disrespect YOUR choice. I said they despise the man. I never said that the man is "abjectively bad man, like drug addictict or criminal" I said the SAME man you described. "who is tall , has a decent job, nice looking, has great personality, spoils me" …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 12:13 PM
1

Let me see I am attracted to man who is tall , has a decent job, nice looking, has great personality, spoils me Ok. Imagine the same man is despised by all your friends. "I wouldn't touch him with a pole". You still FEEL he has the same value? Aren't you devalued by choosing a man no one of your friends wants? Now imagine a "manwhore". He had sex with 10 of your friends, and let all of them drooling after him. They want him back, because he was the best sex they had. Wouldn't you like to have hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 11:20 AM
1

That's avoiding the question. Are you attracted to a man that no other woman wants?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 10:46 AM
1

Women will not jump automatically to another male, unless he is a safe bet, where "safe" is whatever the woman feels. ​ That's what "Monkey branching" explains. The monkey has a hand firm in one branch, and only leaves it after he feel safe grabbing the new one. ​ The woman may not leave you, but may cheat, and she will test the waters all the time. All women test the waters, all the time. That's why they spend a lot of time with make up, and looking good, even to go to work. ​ She is always thr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 10:39 AM
2

As a woman I definitely don't respect man whores and never would want to have relationships with one The opposite to a man whore is an incel. Are you attracted to incels?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 09:58 AM
1

Birth control has no effect on human nature. ​ Maybe 1000 years in the future it changes human DNA, but not yet. Evolution takes a loong time, and many generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 09:55 AM
1

All those desperate rich, powerful, influential men married to porn stars and other kinds of sluts? Yes. The "manosphere" is full of desperate rich, powerful, influential men. ​ That's because women feel their beta status, no matter how rich, powerful and influential those men are. After a woman feels that he is a beta male, the woman leaves him, or cheats, no matter how rich, powerful and influential. ​ That's why so many rock stars committed suicide after they found that wealth and fame failed…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 09:36 AM
1

many a man is entirely open to dating and marrying prostitutes and porn stars "Many man" are beta males.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 09:30 AM
0

Nobody tells a daughter "get away from that disabled beggar with one eye and barf smell". ​ Daughters are warned about men daughters are attracted to. ​ And daughters never hear it, because it is against their desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 09:22 AM
1

Being a slut is degrading for evolutionary reasons: ​ A slut is more probably pregnant, from another man, so she is a risk, and an extremely bad bet for a man. That's why men fell instinctual, hardwired disgust at the prospect of being tied to a slut. ​ Sluts are easily seduced by many men, so a slut is more probable to cheat, depriving a man of his own sons. ​ Men don't get pregnant, so that's not an evolutionary risk for a woman. ​ Any sexually successful man is more attractive to a woman, bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 09:13 AM
-2

Sorry to tell you that playboy no more "celebrates curves", because it was sold to the woke corporation, and now has LGBT photography and some landwhales.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 08:52 AM
1

There are a lot of experiments where a man made a fake tinder profile for a woman that was old, ugly, with children, and shitty personality, and she was flooded with male attention. ​ Instead all it takes for a man to get zero interest on tinder, is to make an average profile of a nice guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:15 AM
–

Men here say they don't give a crap about how much a woman makes. But I also see men here say that they are wary of being used for their money/being seen as a wallet and wan't the woman to do her share. There is no contradiction there. A pretty woman is attractive. A woman with money is not attractive. A woman trying to use a man for his money is unattractive. ​ Attractive is positive. Not attractive is neutral. Unattractive is negative.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:25 AM
1

attracted to everything -> false I feel like I can never be truly special to a guy because he can have the exact same attraction for a billion other girls That's because you want to do nothing, and "be loved" without making any effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter