TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lrellok Archive

View 130 posts and 1,594 comments by Lrellok on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3343

IntactivismLrellok/r/MensRights02/04/16 06:19 PM
196

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights22/04/16 08:24 AM
185

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights27/04/16 05:04 AM
159

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:52 AM
142

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:45 AM
113

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:57 AM
83

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:49 AM
68

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:59 PM
68

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:31 AM
66

AnalysisLrellok/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:31 PM
58

ProgressLrellok/r/MensRights10/05/19 05:38 AM
57

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights25/08/16 03:06 PM
55

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights04/05/17 03:48 PM
55

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights19/07/15 09:06 PM
50

IntactivismLrellok/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:15 AM
50

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:31 AM
47

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights31/12/16 09:19 PM
41

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:08 PM
41

Lrellok/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:40 PM
41

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:06 PM
40

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:58 AM
34

Lrellok/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:14 PM
34

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights27/12/15 08:26 PM
34

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights01/04/18 01:29 AM
33

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights22/09/16 07:00 AM
32

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights06/07/15 02:40 PM
27

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights24/05/16 07:54 PM
27

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights16/09/16 07:21 AM
25

AnalysisLrellok/r/MensRights08/03/15 06:12 PM
25

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:03 PM
25

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:39 AM
25

Lrellok/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:02 PM
24

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights06/07/16 10:34 PM
24

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:11 PM
24

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights28/04/17 05:49 PM
24

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:20 AM
23

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights10/07/17 03:25 AM
22

Lrellok/r/MensRights16/02/16 08:06 PM
22

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:53 AM
20

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:31 AM
19

Lrellok/r/MensRights06/08/16 04:53 PM
17

Anti-MRMLrellok/r/MensRights29/10/17 06:09 AM
17

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:56 AM
17

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:36 AM
16

OpinionLrellok/r/MensRights25/03/15 02:56 PM
16

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights15/09/17 10:30 PM
15

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:34 PM
15

Lrellok/r/MGTOW20/10/14 06:10 PM
15

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights08/02/17 10:45 PM
14

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights08/06/15 04:19 PM
14

AnalysisLrellok/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:07 PM
14

Lrellok/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:35 PM
14

AnalysisLrellok/r/MensRights03/03/15 11:59 PM
13

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:40 PM
12

QuestionLrellok/r/MensRights22/10/14 03:14 AM
12

Raising AwarenessLrellok/r/MensRights03/01/15 05:23 PM
12

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights25/12/15 03:37 AM
12

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:30 PM
11

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:31 PM
11

Blogs/VideoLrellok/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:39 PM
10

DiscussionLrellok/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:56 AM
10

AnalysisLrellok/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:21 PM
10

QuestionsLrellok/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:26 AM
9

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:49 AM
9

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:45 PM
9

DiscussionLrellok/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:09 AM
9

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:51 PM
9

Lrellok/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:42 AM
8

Anti-MRMLrellok/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:27 AM
8

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights23/03/16 02:56 PM
8

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights25/05/16 06:23 PM
8

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights14/01/17 04:02 AM
8

Lrellok/r/MensRights20/04/16 10:13 PM
7

Lrellok/r/MensRights11/09/16 03:55 PM
7

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights24/04/15 05:24 PM
6

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights19/02/16 05:24 AM
6

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights28/10/15 10:18 PM
5

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights27/10/18 02:43 PM
5

DiscussionLrellok/r/MensRights20/03/15 04:52 PM
5

QuestionLrellok/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:42 AM
5

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:35 PM
4

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:35 PM
4

QuestionsLrellok/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:41 AM
4

Blogs/VideoLrellok/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:29 AM
4

Lrellok/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:21 AM
4

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:49 PM
4

Lrellok/r/askTRP13/03/16 10:50 PM
4

Marriage/DivorceLrellok/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:20 PM
4

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:42 PM
3

Lrellok/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:46 AM
3

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights05/10/15 09:34 PM
3

Lrellok/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:07 AM
3

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights26/07/15 10:51 PM
3

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights17/05/16 05:50 PM
3

Question for RedPillLrellok/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 08:13 PM
3

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights05/08/15 04:59 AM
3

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:30 AM
3

Lrellok/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:37 PM
3

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights11/06/15 11:59 PM
3

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights23/02/18 09:26 PM
3

Lrellok/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:41 PM
3

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:05 AM
2

QuestionLrellok/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:32 PM
2

DiscussionLrellok/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:51 AM
2

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:36 PM
2

Lrellok/r/MensRights20/10/14 11:57 PM
2

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights17/02/17 05:58 PM
2

Question for Red PillLrellok/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:44 AM
2

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights05/07/16 08:26 AM
1

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:12 AM
1

GeneralLrellok/r/MensRights12/07/16 12:50 PM
1

Lrellok/r/MensRights01/10/14 07:19 PM
1

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights03/11/16 05:45 PM
1

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights29/10/17 06:05 AM
1

False AccusationLrellok/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:49 AM
1

Lrellok/r/MGTOW29/09/14 04:25 AM
1

Anti-MRMLrellok/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:19 AM
1

DiscriminationLrellok/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:19 PM
1

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:18 PM
1

AnalysisLrellok/r/MensRights24/12/14 09:07 PM
1

Social IssuesLrellok/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:56 PM
0

AnalysisLrellok/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:46 PM
0

Lrellok/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:00 AM
0

Lrellok/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:19 AM
0

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights23/10/17 10:14 PM
0

QuestionLrellok/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:31 AM
0

Lrellok/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:05 AM
0

Lrellok/r/MensRights25/09/16 04:48 AM
0

Lrellok/r/MGTOW22/11/14 02:43 PM
0

FeminismLrellok/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:32 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,594 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ill settle for seeing my own profile and then suing them for liable.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 12:57 AM
2

I was doing economic research (im a communist fyi) and realized that under the system of supply and demand wages are negative sum. The more people are working the less everyone is paid. Womens entey into the labor market has cost workers, since 1970 and adjusted to 2020 dollars, 42 TRILLION. For context that is $127,000 for every man, women and child in the united states or $340,000 per household. When i went to discuss this with feminists i knew i was informed that their independance was worth …
/r/MensRights25/12/23 10:53 PM
1

What is mindblowing to me is that the centeral theme of second and third wave feminism was that if men just expressed their feelings more, society would be fine. Not inly did this not fix anything, it turns out women really, really did not want to see that side of men.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 05:38 AM
1

As a childless bachelor, i frankly have not noticed at all. But then i drive truck for a living so i really dont talk to people much.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 05:15 AM
1

What is even more important is that, if you calculate based on a percentage of productivity per hour, the wage gap has closed entirely at the expence of men for no gain by women at all. No, seriously, if we had held at 1970 ratios, median male income would be $127,000 for a full time job. Its currently half that.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 04:48 AM
2

I wish to disagree with your definition of entitlement. To me, and entitlement is anything guarenteed by society. It can be earned or not, deserved or not. This is an important distinction becouse in my construction social duty is not performed in a vacuum. If society says i am requiered, for instance, to remain physically fit, why should i not expect society to provide me a free gum membership so i am able to meet the expectations that have been imposed?
/r/MensRights23/12/23 03:17 AM
1

This will only be solved with an UBI. When women have to feed cloth and house hoards of unemployed and unemployable men, it will stop. Not before.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 03:06 AM
1

High, open and unrependant marxist here. If being force to work against your will at a job you hate for a fraction of your production under threat of stsrvation and hypothermia is a firm of oppression, then the most oppressed group.of people in human history is men and boys. Feminists are literally saying things to have something to say.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 05:04 AM
1

Survey is very short and not intrusive 10/10 would take again.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 04:53 AM
3

"Requier every working female to feed cloth and house a non working partener. I will be interested in your excuses after that."
/r/MensRights10/06/23 12:05 AM
3

Whats hillarious to me is that the major opposition to transgender is feminists themselves.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:35 AM
32

This cannot possibly have ANYTHING to do with 25 to 34 year old men having lost half their earning potential in the last 40 years! No no, clearly the PORN IS TO BLAME!
/r/MensRights24/02/23 07:13 PM
5

Absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 07:10 PM
2

If you have not run someone over and killed them while drunk, i personally assure there is a trucking compsny who will hand you the keys to their truck. I am saying this becouse 1) ALL interactions with drivers are recorded, so no one can give instructions then deny it later and 2) the companies are terrifued of loosing actual good drivers anyone pulling anything in the office gets the boot FAST.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 03:27 AM
1

I have had female freinds for years, and the simple rule is "we never ask eachother for anything". I never have to buy her anything, or go do anything for her. The one and only time ive had to tell someone to sit down he was so over the line the whole room was up at what he did. Ladies, you want men to be your freind, dont expect them to do anything you would not expect another female to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 07:02 PM
15

I am curious what he said actually. There where a few studies YEARS ago that said the majority of convicted rapists where themselves victims of sexual.or domestic violence by female perpetrators. If that is the case we have a gender nuetral violence cycle that women are as responcible to break as men are.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 11:55 PM
32

We will welcome them whenever they are ready to start.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 09:13 PM
2

As a practicing MGTOW, yeah, r mgtow was a cespit. The problem was that it was always this ir that guy bitching about his ex, not men discussing intersting and fun ways to enjoy being themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/21 04:24 PM
2

From march of 2020 https://gueuropeanhorizons.medium.com/the-future-is-female-consumption-b985bb377551 Gee, that changed FAST...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/21 04:05 PM
1

Oh my goodness a whole 47$ a week! The wonder, the amasement!
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:48 PM
2

WOW, just think, i was my girlfriends fault when i cheated on her....oh, wait, that's not what she thought at all!
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:33 AM
1

There is no transphobia....only misandry.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:43 AM
1

My understanding is this applies only in situations where one or both of the people involved WILL die. Does anyone have actual text of the legislation in question?
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:33 AM
6

SOlid article, it is good to see main stream outlets waking up to the problem. I particularly like where he realizes the road forward CANNOT be zero sum. That was my own first break with feminism.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:31 AM
2

AND another 'Socialist" server gets taken over by hipster Muppet's. Sad, every time it happens.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:25 AM
25

A man has killed himself. This is exactly the thing we are fighting to stop. That he believed a group of people who are going, sooner or later, to turn on him is of no consequence. A man has killed himself, that is our only relevant concern.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:57 PM
1

"Meto cannot survive if women do not recognise themselves as capable of violence and abuse as men are!" ... ... Well that was a fun social movement, anyone for pumpkine spiced lattes?
/r/MensRights27/10/18 08:29 PM
1

Can you refute the claim? Point out a falasy? Do anything other then bray platitudes?
/r/MensRights25/10/18 05:21 PM
2

Not in the slightest. You asked about "special needs", implying needs that where beyond the normal expectations for a person of the group in question. That nessesarily referances what the normal expectations are.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 04:40 PM
3

Yes actuallyn i have two metal pins in my spine and cannot bungee jump or plat contact sports! Ty for asking, expectations of masculinity that are unrealistic for 90% of men are one of our core issues!
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:23 PM
3

Wow, this is like watching the guy who stumbled drunkenly into the womens center asking for a free std test. Not who they where, not what they did.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:57 PM
2

Can i get link or archive or article?
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:48 PM
4

Whomever posted here before me, it looks like your shadow banned. Could someone archive so my phone can see this?
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:43 PM
2

Ty for source!
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:09 PM
2

actually get beck to me in a week, i just got a job offer from a company that does yard driving, so i am going to have a ton of time in the future if that works out. SERENDIPITY!
/r/MensRights23/07/18 07:52 PM
10

No i think multi billion dollar corporations with a history of worker abuse defining social norms is a bad thing. Big difference.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 05:26 PM
2

Oh they where still anarchists, but at the time feminism was in one of its more radical exclusionary phases and Crimethink became a haven for people who did not agree that all men necessarily need to be killed.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:35 PM
1

I would say that it directly refutes the Pareto principle, as if they had to pay for all their own babies they would not reproduce at all, one generation out, but i am glad you found it helpful! I would add that women only reward this type of pattern because it is socially and legally acceptable. Mandatory paternity testing of all children and directly linking child support to biological fatherhood would end their interest in this inside of a generation.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 07:33 PM
1

THe term you are looking for is "Negative Externalities". cuckolding encourages people like PUA to adopt a low investment breeding pattern, where they can get 15, 20, 40 women pregnant, confident that other men will pay to raise the child. I actually knew guys in college who had kids with 12 different women, and would joke about how if they had to pay for all their own babies, they would be poor as dirt.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 07:23 PM
1

my current stance is that gender roles are division of labor necessary to prevent workers from freezing and starving to death. http://i.imgur.com/65EIvMW.gif because labor is a commodity, when supply increases prices fall regardless of productivity. Thus, the supply of labor has to be maintained at half or less of the population in order to maintain a decent standard of living for the majority of people. If women want to work, then they are free to support a non working partner, but historically…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 07:19 PM
1

The sad part is that when i was in Crimethink a decade ago, they where incredibly critical of feminist dogma....
/r/MensRights18/07/18 07:13 PM
1

I think there are now 4 of those, not counting honeybadgers
/r/MensRights18/07/18 07:11 PM
22

I attended the campus where these rules where first created. In the three years i was there, i had a dozen women stand screaming in my face that i was a misogynist because i expected them to initiate everything and ask my consent at every stage. The lesbians who actually wrote them did not even pretend to follow them. This is simply a way to use societal norms to criminalize men, feminists have no intention of actually following the rules they have written.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 06:58 PM
2

Just out of curiosity, does spain have a written constitution guaranteeing innocent until proven guilty? Because if it does, this law is going to get overturned fast.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 06:20 PM
1

I would happily hep however i can, i drive truck though, so my time is very limited. And providing more left wing leadership is not divisive, it is the only way we are going to win.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 01:17 AM
3

not to the point. We have leaders who do not seem interested in Locke, Rawls, Russoue, or Hobbes, and are trying to advocate human rights. That is a little worrying.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:41 PM
2

Here is an idea, can anyone make the same emoji with a male head, to symbolize male reproductive choice?
/r/MensRights10/07/18 09:13 PM
3

SO by totally ignoring the primary mechanism of violence (Emotional or mental violence) the manage to wave the problem of female on male violence away. Cute, when you are ready to listen to what we are saying, get back to us.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:21 PM
1

Is it not amazing the instant men assert bodily autonomy, the entire concept gets thrown out the window?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:10 AM
1

https://youtu.be/-TPwjUmS7Vw?t=232
/r/MensRights16/06/18 06:06 AM
-1

Its called Deffuing, Molonue originally proposed it. There is a reason i think that guy si toxic to our movement. never advocate something you would not want your opponents doing to you.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 07:01 PM
1

Neo Fuedalism at its finest. The idea that your perception of a thing is right regardless of its truth of falsity is the basis of the Divine right of kings and centuries of barbarism in europe. These people are not progressives, they are reactionaries to their core.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:41 PM
73

I am a truck driver. If i am over tired because my dispatcher is screaming at me to run 14 hours a day and i hit a car, i am responsible. If i am driving over the speed limit and cannot stop in time for a red light becouse the load "Absolutely has to be there on time", i am responsible. One of your jobs as a professional is to tell your boss "This is not safe" and refuse to proceed until the problem is corrected.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 06:36 AM
1

for those interested, Women do a total of 12 hours of house work vs mens 6 hours, according to the same source. So this would mean a total work week of 46 hours for women and 53 hours for men. Equality my buttox.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:37 PM
1

SO the feminist movement just flatly conceded women are less capable at work then men are...i wonder if this has anything to do with them being paid less. Or we could reduce the work week for both men AND women, now there is a good idea...
/r/MensRights08/06/18 07:17 AM
1

good, once we stop praising infantile dilutions, maybe we can get all the effort men put in on women's behalf recognized as worthy of reciprocation.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 07:55 AM
-5

I am curios, does anyone here believe this women killed the cow, skinned it, cured the leather, shaped it, molded it (Hand crafting the molds) formed it, sewed the pieces together so she could have a pair of shoes? Children think they are independent. Adults understand they are dependent upon a thousand thousand others most of whom they will never meet.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 07:54 AM
1

The problem is that the only current alternative is AVFM, which rarely if ever approves new members. We hav etried discord several times, but it always dies out. If you have ideas for a platform i will happily move, i would love to be able to post my youtube content to other mens advocates.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 03:27 AM
2

If you do not cry at then end of Sword of a Stranger, you have no soul at all. But for the trash cartoon they listed? No. Just no.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 09:57 PM
1

https://i.redditmedia.com/RdyAM_zlC5LFday3OPDhzQExjCi8owoAOW6IoEjUMTM.jpg?s=b23ecebf409237082daa2f30e636d926 this was posted above, i have the feeling it is relevant here. CHange THIS, and you might see more men willing to teach.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:12 PM
2

Get...A...Lawyer! Seriously, we should post that at the top of the page as a permanent sticky or something, we spend enough time repeating it.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:10 PM
11

Tried to archive, apparently they have blocked that.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:59 PM
2

Having had several friends who where either homeless, addicts, or both, no. There is a reason to ban chemically addictive substances. Marijuana laws i can agree are unwarranted, but heroin and cocaine need to be illegal.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 07:08 AM
2

also, THIS! https://quartzy.qz.com/1230002/sandra-bullock-and-cate-blanchett-had-a-penis-facial-its-not-that-strange/ https://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/17/wtf-baby-boys-circumsized-foreskins-used-for-wrinkle-treatments/
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:31 PM
7

I cannot wear condoms. No i mean literally, i cannot feel enough sensation to remain hard with a condom on. This has been a huge problem in EVERY relationship i have had, to the point where if i know a women expect to use a condom during sex i have simply ended the relationship then and there, as we are going to be physically incapable of intamacy.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:14 PM
2

I decided to spend a year in college walking around with no shirt on whenever it was warmer then 60 degrees. Every, person EVERYONE who told me i had to wear a shirt because it was distracting was female, and most of them where feminists. This is not slut shaming, this is simply the normal standard for both men and women.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:09 PM
1

I decided to spend a year in college walking around with no shirt on whenever it was warmer then 60 degrees. Every person EVERYONE who told me i had to wear a shit because it was distracting was female, and most of them where feminists. This is not slut shaming, this is simply the normal standard for both men and women.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:08 PM
10

Look up the origin of Vagrancy and Loitering laws some time. They literally passed laws so they could imprison homeless men and use them as forced labor. Progress is slow, but we are moving forward.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:06 PM
1

Well, at least we have moved past "All drunken sex is rape!"
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:04 PM
5

https://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(17)30315-X/fulltext30315-X/fulltext) Knew i bookmarked this for a reason "Here, we combined images of male and female body shape with information on annual salary to elucidate the influence of economic status on the attractiveness ratings by opposite sex raters in American, Chinese and European populations. We found that ratings of attractiveness were around 1000 times more sensitive to salary for females rating males, compared to males rating females…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:34 PM
1

1) usually screaming hysterics initialy. Once i get past that, it is reletively easy to argue that adressing gender from one side only is counter productive to actual progress. 2) yes, alot, you simply need to couch it in economic terms. IE "Men are not going to accept women compeing with them for labor while they continue to be socially and legally obligated to pay for alimony and child support." 3) ....I have been here so long i actually have forgotten...
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:20 PM
1

backwords, but true. The best idea would to be to tie education to a mandatory provisioning role. That is, if you decide to go to college and get a degree, you are required to feed, cloth and house someone else when you are done. The rest would sort itself after that.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:33 AM
1

or mens education for that matter, the number of idiots i knew in college who graduated with communications majors and are working at walmart. We need to set the standard that college is for a career.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:28 PM
1

The problem is that education costs a ton. A four year degree (assuming it only takes 4 years) cost 100k. Total cost of all tuition in the united states is 400 billion annually. Thats alot of money for degrees that no one is using. For that kind of money we could literally start a WPA guaranteeing every single household with children below the poverty line a $25,000 a year job. Which is a better use of the money, Pottery degrees or erasing poverty?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:40 AM
1

ty! Someone gets it!
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:32 AM
4

The problem is that we have promoted education as a goal in and of itself. I see so many people saying "College is about knowledge!" not realizing that they can get exactly the same knowledge reading independently. A useful project would be to start an independant university where you are told what books you need to read for a degree in subject X, get a test on your knowledge of the subject and "graduate" if you pass the test.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:32 AM
1

GO mandatory 30 hour week!
/r/MensRights14/05/18 04:47 PM
3

Kool, campaign for a 30 hour work week with corresponding pay increase here we come! I am fully on board for men working less hours for more pay, my MMO game needs more time!
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:23 PM
5

THis is what is going to happen anywhy. For those of you who do not remember being 12 years old, girls are icky and have cooties. The prime recruiting age is going to flood out of the program and parents who want their boys in something are going to create a new program for boys who are unwilling or uninterested in sharing space with girls (who i repeat, are icky and have cooties).
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:31 PM
8

The king is above the law.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:18 PM
3

Prediction; the boy scouts will soon contain no boys at all becouse "Its full of yucky girls" and a new program will have to be started exclusively for boys.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:13 PM
1

THis and the boy scouts thing happening the same week....Karma, you are beautiful.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:21 AM
1

Mental check list time, the number of lesbians i knew in college who now have a husband and two kids is.....about 60%.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:20 AM
29

So just curios, how loud do you think feminists will scream when the girl scouts are required to admit boys?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:16 AM
4

The original stage of socialism is "From each according to their ability, too each according to their contribution." Only after (and if) ALL person are able to equally contribute would equal distribution be implemented. If women want to use half again the resources of men, then under socialism they would be required to work 50% longer. Sounds like a mens rights platform to me, friend.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 08:02 PM
2

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/A_country_comparison_of_rape_and_sexual_assault_rate_trends%2C_per_100000_people%2C_2003_-_2011%2C_United_Nations.png Annual rapes reported per 100,000 people.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 06:14 PM
1

because women are obviously totally incapable of advancing if someone does not hold their hand..../s ANd people say we are misogynist.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 06:09 PM
6

i assume you are talking about the sub and not the condition of capitalism where all easily accessible resources have been used and companies now have to cannibalize each other to find profits?
/r/MensRights01/05/18 06:06 PM
123

not all democrats are feminist. No all socialists are either.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 06:05 PM
6

The responce i usually give to this is "Yes, becouse having to do as much for others as you expect them to do for you is a terrible form of oppression you cannot possibly bear to suffer." Because when it comes down to it, that is what they are complaining about. Women did not have jobs because men where expected to. Husbands and Wives where equally each others property, Infidelity and inability to support your spouse where two grounds of fault under Victorian divorce laws. Men where expected to …
/r/MensRights01/05/18 06:04 PM
3

MANKAMPH TIME! Obviously, I am well aware that this behaviour is not a fair representation of all jews, yet it is common enough for non-jews to be wary. I’m not saying that I go into every relationship with every jew I’ve met assuming they're an abusive, raping, sexist asshole; lord knows I’d have zero friends if that’s what I did. Yet, whenever I meet a jew for the first time, I won’t trust them until they prove themselves to be trustworthy. When somebody says they’re afraid of dogs after an at…
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:08 AM
1

yet my point stands then. SJW and marxists are non classical liberals. Yet both classical and non classical liberals are all liberals. SJW's have no more relation to marxists then marxists do to classical liberals, or as much relation if you prefer.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:04 AM
1

I included the links in the post. Living wage is base don the minimum cost of living in a given area with a given household size. The differnace in cost between one 4 person household and two 1 person/3person households times the number of single parent households is what i am using.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:02 AM
1

YEs, exactly. If someone says "no atheist believes in god", and another person says "Well I'm an Atheist and i believe in god!" is telling them they are not an atheist a fallacy? No, because they are not an atheist. You did this yourself two returns back claiming SJW and Marxists are not liberals despite them being left of center.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:16 PM
2

nm, my math is wrong. 29.5 x 14 should equal 413 billion. ty sir, my bad.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 01:07 AM
1

Every form of marxism that has been tried in the form of a government, except Nazism, was communism. USSR? Communist. China? Communist. Vietnam? Communist. Cuba? Communist. The sin que non of communism is that the workers directly and democratically control the means of production. At no juncture in any of those countries did that occur. This is like arguing that china is a democracy because they have a political parties. Marx predicted the lower class would get bigger and poorer. They got small…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:16 PM
3

They need to smear us with something or people might start listening to our arguements
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:08 PM
8

http://livingwage.mit.edu/metros/16740 Annual cost of a 2 parent 2 child household $51,500 Annual cost of one 1parent 2 child and one 1 parent household $81000 Difference $29,500 Total number of single parent households in the united states, 14 million Total annual cost of Divorce, $413 billion. Annual costs divided by full time employees; $3,200 per employee And for comparisons sake US Defence Budget FY 2017; 823 Billion Social Security fy 2017; 945 billion Medicare fy 2017; 708 billion EDIT, m…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:49 PM
1

Is a tongue or nipple a sex organ? If you have some idea what you are doing, very definitely yes. Where do you see that? https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf Multiply the one year numbers for women, you get the lifetime numbers. For men, not even close. The only way you get rains numbers is to ignore made to penetrate. This is common among women, too. Non Sequiter. Both women and men rationalizing violence against them does not support one having more violence then t…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:42 AM
1

Ok, so what did you mean when you said "Thus, marxists demanding that political authority NOT be involved in what they are doing is them asserting that they are not interested in power and control, but rather liberating themselves from economic coercion."? OK, i have already explained this, but we will try again. Because all of the shelter, food and clothing is owned by the few, the majority of people are forced to sell their labor at any price simply to stay alive. This is coercion, as if the g…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 04:49 PM
1

So marxism is capitalism, because they want free markets? Bullshit. I'm relatively ignorant of marxism, but not that ignorant. No, Free Markets are a contradiction in terms. The market requires coercion in so far as property has no meaningful existence without government enforcing it. However, by enforcing property the government allows the few to control all food, all clothing and all shelter, forcing people to sell wages under threat of starvation and hypothermia. ANd let us be clear here, rig…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:38 PM
1

Since you appear not to have understood it, I'll explain it more clearly. The first sentence, about government assistance, shows that your argument is meant to debunk an argument that nobody actually made. Your argument is debunked by your own words. You asserted (repeatedly) that marxism is about power and control. While i recognize that not all forms of power are political, the most direct frm of power is political power. Thus, marxists demanding that political authority NOT be involved in wha…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 11:18 PM
1

I am repeating the earlier argument because obviously you did not understand it the first time. You did not make a counter arguement, you made a bait and switch, stating marxism was about control then denying you had said such becouse you had not used the word "Government". And yes, i am calling you on ignoring my arguments while you are accusing me of ignoring yours. So I don't think that's true, but even if it is, why would marxists object to added prestige? We do not need prestige for the sam…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:54 PM
2

This is a statement i technically agree with....though not for any of the reason i imagine the original author thinks.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:56 PM
1

SJW have always been about top down change. That's not really a difference between them and communists. The very first decision made by the very first group of communists at their very first meeting was, and i quote, “The emancipation of the working class can only be achieved by the working class itself — without the assistance of governments.” Here's where it becomes obvious you didn't read my argument. That is rich considering you have completely ignored mine. You have no problem saying classi…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:49 PM
3

Where did anita sarkisian go to yell about video games? The UN. Where did "Affirmative consent" advocates go? The Education department. SJW have always been about top down change. The reason it is relevant is obvious, if you want to tell if a movement is being co-opted or is true to its original principles, you look at the original principles. I can call anything capitalism or free speech if i randomly define capitalism or free speech to be whatever i want, but anyone with two brain cells is goi…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:29 AM
3

waves hand RIght here. And they are not "Cultural Marsists" that term is incoherent. The very first decision made by the very first group of communists at their very first meeting was, and i quote, “The emancipation of the working class can only be achieved by the working class itself — without the assistance of governments.” Yet these SJW try to do everything, not by organizing the workers voluntarily, but by co-opting positions of authority and demanding cart blanch moral authority based on ac…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:15 AM
2

Google "Brochalist"
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:02 AM
3

ty for link
/r/MensRights19/04/18 01:56 AM
2

Yeah, i am going to have to do a video breakdown of why this is incoherent, but lets do some simple starters In a communist society, wages would functionally not exist, you would work at a task according to your skills and receive a equal or proportional share of the material wealth created based upon your work. The idea that women are not paid is incoherant in socialist theory, as the goal is that everyone is paid in there own work, so technically housework is paid exactly the same as all labor…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 01:54 AM
5

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg Labor is a supply. When prices fall, supply dwindles. This is 101 level economics. https://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/assets/4599519/fredgraph__3_.png That said, the period when male laborforce saw its largest decline is before male wages started falling. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=JJJ But does match the overall increase in labor force.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 01:43 AM
3

"Anyone who asks me for a sandwich is handed a sandwich" "You are not handing enough sandwiches to Group A" "If Group A wants a sandwich, they are welcome to ask, anyone who asks gets a sandwich." "You hate group A because you are not actively seeking them out to hand sandwichs to them!" I am a communist and i see where the problem here is.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 12:18 AM
1

National surveys by the U.S. Census Bureau are also revealing. A 2012 study asked respondents whether they had ever forced someone to have sex against their will: of those who said they had, 43.6 per cent were female Forty-two per cent would lie about contraception in order to get pregnant, no matter the wishes of their partner. And an alarming 31 per cent said they would not tell a future partner if they had a sexual disease: this rises to 65 per cent among single women. THe problem with the ra…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:54 PM
8

you want to see women upset? Demand they follow consent for you. No, seriously, find a women who really, obviously likes you and tell her you are not going to do anything unless she ask's you to first. Watch her loose interest in seconds. The reason men pursue women is because women EXPECT to be pursued. When women want consent culture, they can start asking mens consent.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 06:33 PM
1

From half way down, with a link "Census Bureau reports that only about one in four STEM bachelor’s degree holders has a STEM job"
/r/MensRights13/04/18 10:43 PM
2

If you liked that, you will love this. https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2014/09/15/stem-graduates-cant-find-jobs We are being lied to. A lot.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:36 PM
3

Less then 9% of adult go to college, get a degree, and get a job in the field they studied. Equality of opportunity necessarily implies that there are enough opportunities for everyone to have one. There are not. https://www.statista.com/statistics/184272/educational-attainment-of-college-diploma-or-higher-by-gender/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/05/20/only-27-percent-of-college-grads-have-a-job-related-to-their-major/?utm_term=.5c1a8e04dc36 I am not interested in the equal ab…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 06:30 PM
7

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg this is not the equality i am looking for.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:27 AM
1

Blacks are much more likely to go to prison for drug offenses, does that make drug addiction an African American problem? No, it means they are simply more likely to be prosecuted. There are now multiple studies showing women are as likely to sexually assault men as men are to assault women. So yes, i agree we need better sex education in school, but it nees to start with the concept that women have as much responsibility to communicate what they want as men do. Continuing to put all the onus on…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 04:30 PM
1

I try to remain civil until the other person becomes uncivil, if I get intense, please be assured it is not because i wish to seem rude, it is simply that so much hangs on this question. As i answered above, Alimony, Child support, homelessness, and male suicide are all linked to this in my view. https://imgur.com/qkJay9r When only on line moves, both volume and price changes. Both lines do not have to move. Now, if we want volume or price to remain the same while the other changes then both lin…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 06:36 PM
0

Economics cannot conduct controlled experiments, so it is impossible to prove anything. However, it is a basic principle that when the supply of a commodity increases its price falls, and that labor is a supply. http://i.imgur.com/NXyCio7.gif What i can show is that at the time women joined the labor force is when mens pay starts dropping, which is consistant with the supply up price down principle.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 07:33 AM
8

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg Since 1970 mens wages have fallen by nearly half. Do you think homelessness would be a problem if that had not happened? Do you think alimony or childsupport would be a burden at $90,000 a year? Do you think suicide rates would be nearly as high if mens labor was valued and rewarded by society. The feminist movement is correct about there being an intersection, they simply got the direction wrong. All of the problems you are concerned about eminate from a single po…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 10:42 PM
3

And what happens when you disribute those same surveys to women? Also, from your own article "120 men admitted to raping to attempting to rape. This is actually a relatively slim proportion of the survey population — just over 6% " So, 94% of men do not and would not rape. But you are going to lecture all men on something the overwhelming majority will never do. Lastly, the whole "strangers are not the majority" is a bait and switch, it occurs becouse koss defines "aquatance" as anyone you have …
/r/MensRights10/04/18 10:28 PM
52

While i recognize that the elite are terrified of loosing 45% or their labor force and the necessary wage correction that would follow (labor is a supply), i am reasonably certain this is not all of the story, as the last time i checked youtube usually included some details as to why the videos where demonetized and i am not seeing that here.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:35 PM
5

yeah, i did a breakdown, wish reddit did not have quite so harsh policies on selfposting youtube. Also, love the assumption that rapist care about consent. I have know men who committed rape, charged, convicted, would flat out tell you they did it, and i can assure you not one of them gave a shit about how their partner felt. Most men do not find the sound of bones breaking to be funny, every last one of these guys thought "Jackass" was the most hilarious show in the world, because "Holy SHit, t…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:24 PM
258

It is amazing watching people give vocal expression to bigotry and then try to rationalize it. Lets say this read; "I swear to god blacks raising their voices is the most terrifying thing in the world. They don;t understand, like its an immedeat panic responce, game over." and "My down stairs neighbors fight on a regular basis, and every time i am they start yelling i'm a little afraid they are going to kill eachother. I have no reason to think this except they are black and they are angry." Rac…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:21 PM
12

Pass a universal basic income first and i have no objections. Good luck with the economy when all the garbage collectors, truck drivers and machinists quit.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:06 AM
5

Are women banned from working in india or something? WHy then should men have to support people competing with then and thus debasing their wages.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 06:02 PM
1

Having tried walking around college campus with no shirt on, and being told by multiple FEMINIST professors that this was inappropriate, i call BS.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 02:56 AM
3

I happen to know this women and I need to correct you here becouse you are reading the article backwords. The "wonderful man" she is talking about makes mid 6 figures in a midtown office. She does not have a "fucked up life" she is living every little girls fantasy. Which puts this article in a whole new context. This is not "poor incompitent whoe is me" this is princess "I got mine, why are these filthy brown people walking up and talking to me like my equal or something!?",
/r/MensRights01/04/18 10:29 PM
1

Not doing as much for others as you expect them to do for you is the theft of their effort, energy and time. Charging them money for the replacement that energy, effort and time from the very stock they gave to you is a form of slow murder.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 03:58 PM
9

I am a hardcore socialist, and whenever i hear women talk about emotional labor, one passage from proudhon rings in my head (genders changed): "In this century of bourgeoisie morality, in which I have had the honor to be born, the moral sense is so debased that I should not be at all surprised if I were asked, by many a worthy proprietor, what I see in this that is unjust and illegitimate? Debased creature! galvanized corpse! how can I expect to convince you, if you cannot tell robbery when I sh…
/r/MensRights01/04/18 04:47 AM
7

During college i tried waling around campus wearing only a pair of cutoff pants. I had a half dozen professors, all of them feminists, insist I go home and put a shirt on. SO men being sex objects is not a thing how?
/r/MensRights01/04/18 02:07 AM
3

And after years of skirting the issue, feminism is finally forced to recognise that jobs are zero sum. Now they must either agree to feed, cloth and house the males they have displaced, or admit they are a fratricidal hate movement.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 09:21 PM
1

Prepare a written complaint and request for review of your grade with the assignment. I can think of at least two courses I took where having that ready was the only reason I passed. I literally handed in the assignment, walked across the hall and handed in the complaint and review request.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:53 AM
1

Make a note for video, save does not like phone
/r/MensRights18/03/18 10:12 PM
3

Yes, because demand one group get as many rights as another group is supremacy....oh...wait.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 05:54 AM
2

The problem here is that tucker is not allowed to criticize major industries. We know why mens testasrone is lowering, there have been half a hundred articles, its called Bisphenol A. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6pn1ry/bpa_is_a_chemical_in_the_food_supply_of_western/
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:36 PM
1

Since this is coming up several times, i am ging to have to repeat myself several times, sorry to the mods. The problem here is that tucker is not allowed to criticize major industries. We know why mens testasrone is lowering, there have been half a hundred articles, its called Bisphenol A. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6pn1ry/bpa_is_a_chemical_in_the_food_supply_of_western/
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:20 PM
1

The problem here is that tucker is not allowed to criticize major industries. We know why mens testasrone is lowering, there have been half a hundred articles, its called Bisphenol A. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6pn1ry/bpa_is_a_chemical_in_the_food_supply_of_western/
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:18 PM
1

Interesting, i am curios what issues they are going to do, if it is simply more tradcon "Men have an obligation to work harder" or are they actually going to delve into things like female on male abuse and sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:48 AM
2

Are you familiar with how the eta where treated in fuedal japan? This is a prelude to that. In order to exploit a group, you first need to dehumanize them.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 09:06 AM
0

you assumption that Hillary is left is entertaining. People call the KKK alt right because they support traditional families and oppose Keynesian economics. I personally could not care less who someone votes for outside of a parliamentary list system, two parties render such things meaningless. Hillary has direcly supported corperate free trade economics, she is not a leftists and most leftists i know voted bernie.... once in the primary, again in the general.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:31 AM
1

they are not alt left, they are neo fuedalist reactionaries. This would be like maoists showing up to the RNC and claiming that because one person ruling was traditional in china, maoism was traditionally conservative and therefore they needed to be given majority voting shares.....and people believed them. The SJW movement is not leftists in an form, strain or metric. They are interested in a social status hierarchy, hate the laboring class, and are trying to virtue signal their way into an adv…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:44 PM
1

please do not confuse these people with actual leftwingers/liberals. They are not. The republicans have RINO's (Republican In Name Only) and we have these people. They are not liberal, they are not and have never been interested in equality or liberating any one at all. The are short sighted, greedy and stupid, and would probably be conservatives a century ago.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:32 AM
2

Sorry for the delay, i had a rough work day yesterday. WHO rescinding was of no importance, Who rescinded it was of immense importance, as it entirely possible that the people who passed it intended for it to be permanent and their opposition opposed that. Do you have a hard time talking to people irl, or are you only this condescending online? I drive a truck IRL, so i do not talk to people at all other then to say "Here is my credit card, pump 1 ty." How come they died democrats and held their…
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:32 AM
1

1.The ideological alignment of the parties was set in the early 20th century. So my statement was true. 2.the so-called "progressives" today stems from progressivism which began in the early 20th century Progress and Poverty was printed in 1880, and was based on Proudhons works from the 1840's, so no, progressivism did not being in the 1900's. President Andrew Johnson rescinded the order and the land returned to its previous owners. Andrew Johnson was a democrat, geesus learn history. And if you…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 06:14 PM
0

no, because at the time the republican part was progressive and the democratic party was conservative. They flipped around ww1. Unless you consider land redistribution conservative? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forty_acres_and_a_mule
/r/MensRights02/03/18 06:24 AM
1

I am almost completely certain that the people who got child labor abolished where progressives.... so no, concern for boys makes you progressive.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:48 PM
17

yeah i was about to comment that multiple repeated purges will have that effect. If we compared the ban list of the two subs, i would bet you would see EXACTLY where all the numbers went to.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:30 AM
3

You are missing the necessary connotations. Men are not human.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:26 AM
2

The basic presumptions of feminism as neo liberal in nature, that is that opportunities being infinite, one person taking an opportunity does not mean that they have a social responsibility to compensate those who did not get the opportunity. As this is the exact opposite of Marxism, and i am a Marxist, i oppose feminism on the grounds that squandering opportunities is to squander the effort of the working people who created the opportunity and thus a form of class exploitation. IE if you go out…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:32 AM
2

Nope, i am an open communist, and opponent of feminism as neo liberal horse shat.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:27 AM
3

The concept of social Marxism is incoherent. In order for a class to be oppressed, they must be placed in a system where they are required to provide a benefit while receiving no benefit in return. Women do not qualify, as the received a benefit in return for the benifits they provided. The other groups where not expected to provide any benefits, so they do not qualify either. Only working people where asked to produce a benefit for a fraction of its objective value.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 05:58 AM
1

Becouse it implies having to do as much for others as you expect to have done for you, even if those others are significantly lower status then yourself.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 06:55 PM
1

I will respond only to your first claim as it is the one I have done the most thinking upon. Rights in no way confir obligations, that is titleledge. I have a right to be presumed innocent, regardless of any obligations society imposes. I have the right to an inpartial trial, and freedom of speech, with no obligations either. Let us compair. This to something else, mens participation in the labor force and education. Since the advent of widescale female employment, mens interest in higher educat…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 11:57 PM
2

Phone being twitchy, I ment IPV or inter partenr violence.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 11:41 PM
1

Well, if we had a UBI, both men and women could retire when they wanted to.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 02:54 AM
1

Yet another stunning example of how feminism is about coercive status hierarchies, not equality. A movement about equality would have nothing to fear from this, look how the colonization of America crippled the feudal regimes of the old world. But a movement bent on the return of those regimes, this would be terrifying, all their work, done to nothing simply by people voting with their feet.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:00 PM
7

I am massively confused right now, but ok. Why would opera have to be rewritten over a movement against sexual assault? I do not know much about opera, but i am pretty certain it does not contain very much on stage sex.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 08:20 AM
72

Should every women be forced to spend 18 years supporting a non working partner?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:21 PM
3

Wow, its almost like they do not understand that we live in a society with limited resources, and that one person problems are never limited to that person. But that is 101 level socialism, so by definition they could not be progressives or leftists then...
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:07 PM
12

please archive if possible NYT has a monthly paywall limit.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:28 PM
1

: “The voices of women and children who have experienced domestic abuse are at the heart of this bill and that is why it is so important for these provisions to operate effectively. One of the critical things is that those in contact with women who could benefit from its provisions understand exactly what psychological abuse and coercive control is.” We know the overwhelming majority of mental and emotional violence is female on male, but clearly the suffering of mmen is so unimportant that only…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:42 PM
3

"The damage that has been done to the male workforce through the economic restructuring is now coming back to haunt us,” Birrell said. This is a perfect example of why UBI is a critical male issue. If women fail economically, there are a hundred thousand men ready to support them. If men fail economically, there is no one. A system for those men who are no longer able to work becouse the jobs are all taken needs to be established. And no, there are not magical infinite jobs.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 02:13 AM
0

You are conflating uneducated with ignorant. Simply becouse someone does not have the time or money for a formal education, does not mean they are unqualified to make decisions. Also, your arguement would directly support a centrally planned economy.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 10:08 PM
0

Begging the Question. I supplied examples. Where are yours?
/r/MensRights04/02/18 10:06 PM
0

ahh yes, the workers are to stupid to do what they are already doing if not for the magical powers of the capitalists... I quote Kropotkin, Let us take a group of volunteers, combining for some particular enterprise. Having its success at heart, they all work with a will, save one of the associates, who is frequently absent from his post. Must they on his account dissolve the group, elect a president to impose fines, or maybe distribute markers for work done, as is customary in the Academy? It i…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 06:21 PM
1

How many companies did trump send into bankruptcy and he is still a billionaire? What is Dick Folds net worth right now? How much would the enron people have walked away with if the feds had not stepped in and charged them? Please stop confusing small actors with large actors, the rules are different and you ought to know that.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 06:11 PM
1

ok, i actually have more issue with the fact that there are word based questions in what is supposed to be a math exam... That completely defeats the point of the homework.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 06:07 PM
1

capitalism allows the owners to charge whatever they want to whomever they want in whatever structure they want. Greetings Comrade, The revolution begins soon...
/r/MensRights03/02/18 06:04 PM
2

I can see a space that says "deleted" which means the comment was removed, not shadow banned.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 11:41 PM
1

Becouse phone does not like save.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 08:23 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights01/02/18 08:21 PM
8

FYI removing a comment is not shadow Banning. Shadow Banning is a status on your account where you can continue to post but no one can read your post. The fact that i am responding to our post means you are not shadow banned, as it applies on all forums at all times. Deleting comments with citation is worrying though, ty for the notice.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:13 PM
1

You do realize that being in a field doesn't guarantee you are actually decent in your job. Which is why we need socialist programs like a UBI...do you even remember what started this discussion? NOTHING guarentees you a job, less then 10% of adults in the united states go to college, get a degree, and get a job in the field they studdied. DO you really think telling 90% of people to freeze and starve to death is a long term sustainable solution? No, that is a recipe for riots and mass insurrect…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:07 PM
1

and? A company is not a person. The OWNERS almost certainly have enough saved to get buy for quite some time. I have no more reason to care about the demise of a company then i have to care about my nieces imaginary friend skinning his knee.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:03 PM
1

Considering that the people voting are those who build cars, i would dbe highly suspect of any such thing would happen, but sure, if the people most experienced at auto construction decide this is the best wya to build cars, then i am good with that.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:00 PM
1

From the article Quite often, the men who live in these areas earn a meagre livelihood and by gathering honey and wood, these men who go into the forest are often killed by tigers when there is a confrontation. So if they had an income they would not have had to go into the woods and would still be alive...geezuz i could not ask fora more perfect example of male disposability
/r/MensRights01/02/18 04:56 PM
0

This is why 1) feminism cannot ben understood as socialist and 2) mens rights requiers a UBI as a central part of any platform.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:45 AM
1

wait, wait, i need to just sit here....i WANT to be working 60 hours a week driving truck.....BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
/r/MensRights29/01/18 07:19 PM
1

Every economic system does to some extent. I ought conflation. THe same way we decide who gets to sit in congress, by voting. If workers are so adamantly opposed to the decision made, they are free to move another shop, or start their own shop, provided they share the result with all those who contributed to it.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:02 PM
0

define "Extanded" then. I personally have enough in savings right now to stop working for two years and be perfectly fine. The entire point of retirement is to stop working for 10-30 years, and most people are able to do that.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:59 PM
1

Depends on the company. Construction workers and tradesmen are always in demand. Niche sectors are almost always in a position of being unable to fill all their employment slots. http://www.mcoscillator.com/data/charts/weekly/Construction_Unemployment_May2017.gif pick one, those are mutually exclusive. Particularly in industries with a 10 point seasonal variance.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:57 PM
1

again, even if a single company goes bankrupt, quite a few of the employees will likely also go bankrupt. There are not magical infinite jobs, certainly not in niche sectors.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 06:58 AM
1

from the comments "To you maybe, madam. Let's see: a man goes out and has ten pints of beer with the lads and "scores" with a woman who is not drunk. He has sex with the woman. Is he a rape victim?" No. Because a woman cannot rape (in the UK). Maybe best to learn what words mean before you use them.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 05:59 PM
2

Red pill. They went hard right when trump came in. This is one of the reason i openly combat conservatives when they show up here, yes we need live bodies, but if we go down the road redpill did we will be politically dead in 10 years time.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 05:47 PM
6

WTF did i just read? Are you kidding with me, you actually think men in the modern era are able to do that? Chivalry was a two sided deal ladies, you blew your end, we have no obligation to come through on ours.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 04:49 PM
3

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg This is actually the norm, men get a pay cur, women get nothing, and the investors laugh all they way to the bank.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 04:47 PM
20

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg And once again the wage gap closes entirely at the expense of men for no gain my women at all. Feminism is not communism, it is cronny capitalism on steroids.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 04:45 PM
1

Construction workers do not go bankrupt if something happens to the property value. If they loose thier job due to the collapse of the construction industry, yeah, they do. Also, if they are looking for employment and cannot find any, they will also go bankrupt. What does foreclosure have to do with construction companies? The rate of foreclosures is a reflection of the demand for construction, if people cannot pay for the homes already in the market, then it is a good bet new homes will not be …
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:13 PM
1

The moment they cannot work for any extended period of time, the company goes under, completely and irrevocably. Yes but that is true of any but the elite of the elite regardless of if they sell labor or not. Unless you re arguing that only multi millionaires are well to do, and flatly conceding the need for a UBI in the process, this is a non sequitur. That said, most of the owner ops i know take vacations of a month to two months a year, due to the disposable income they have. I have already s…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:10 PM
1

your ant analogy argues for capitalism and the loss of the power of the individual Well, it is good to see someone who can admit capitalism disempower's the individual, ty for your candor sir. BUt no, my annalogy does not prve anything of the kind, the principles here have been well understood for centuries. No one is ignorant of the difficulties that are met with in the conversion of untilled land into arable and productive land. These difficulties are so great, that usually an isolated man wou…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:05 PM
3

RIght now, in the united states, less then 10% of adults go to college, get a degree, and get a job in the field they studied. Nearly half of all STEM graduates are working in non stem fields because they cannot get a job in the most in demand field in the world. But "The world is a place of opportunity." If I wanted evidence that feminism cannot be marxist, this, right here, would be it.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:23 PM
1

Hasty Generalization, Construction companies CAN go bankrupt, they are not certain to go bankrupt, unless you are looking at very different numbers then i am. in 2012 the total number of homeowners was 86,985,872 of which 2,300,000 filed for foreclosure. That's 2.6% annual foreclosure rate. That is not a significant risk. and yes, i know quite alot about economics ty.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:00 PM
1

they employ no one but themselves, and earn nearly $80,000 a year or there abouts. Simply because you are not benefiting from the hard work of others does not mean you are going to freeze and starve. It is usually the Lease to Own guys who are one sick day from homelessness, and they are full on being exploited, any experienced driver will tell you lease to own is a swindle. Our nation produced 18 trillion dollars in goods with 120 million full time equivalent employees in 2015, that is $150,000…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:51 PM
1

An ant operates on a hivemind, and the hive is actually quite powerful. exactly.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:44 PM
1

The eu is a single market, which is the normal function of a national government. The Netherlands would not be able to function as it does without the rest of the EU, they would have to diversify, its called the "Resource Curse" in economics. Power will always be necessary for survival. What power might i ask does a single ant have? They seem to survive quite fine. A mouse? Also surviving. A shrimp? A sparrow? Survival does not require power, exploitation requires power, how you are getting thes…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 10:33 PM
1

I know quite a few owner ops who work exceedingly hard, but are not employed by anyone....Simply becouse people do not have an employer does not mean they are not going to get paid. As to your space station, if appropriate safety measures are taken, mostly yes. You might have some cost over run's, but assuming the original idea was not a boondoogle, you will run no risk of loosing the whole wad.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 10:28 PM
0

yes, because people are suddenly going to realize they always wanted to live in trees....
/r/MensRights23/01/18 10:25 PM
1

Why does the project need funding....to pay the workers and researchers. Why is there financial risk...because rent-seekers exploiting production. Why does land need to be paid for....because government protecting the interests of the few. But very well, i will listen to your argument. Certainly, we can agree that Bobobu do not have capital? Then we can logically infer that our common ancestors with bonobu also did not have capital? And that the primitive tribes that moved north out of africa al…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:38 PM
1

what country has a decent standard of living and isn't funding it's "income equality" through the exploitation of vast natural resources sold exported to foreign countries? That is the question you asked, and the question i answered. Europe is funding its income inequality primarily by financial instruments, not resource exploitation. And Kropotkin was never attempted. You asked for a model, not an actual economy, you DO understand the difference right?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:32 PM
0

yes, i am well aware of how rentseeking works. The ability of some people to extort money for thing they did not contribute to is the fault of the poor how?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:29 PM
0

yes, actually, they are. https://www.bea.gov/industry/gdpbyind_data.htm If you organize the tables by total production, the 25 largest categories in order are: State and local general government Housing Other real estate Hospitals Merchant wholesalers, durable goods Merchant wholesalers, nondurable goods Insurance carriers Management of companies and enterprises Federal general government (defense) Monetary authorities and depository credit intermediation Offices of physicians Federal general go…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:17 PM
1

really? So david koch waved a magic wand and oil refineries sprang out of the ground? Or did workers have to build them? The technology you are speaking of is simply another form of labor, which created the wealth it is paid in. The origin of all production, form the factory assembled by workers, to the stamp press designed and assembled by workers, to the chemical process researched by workers, is the result of the labor of workers. It is only the intervention of the government that allows the …
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:08 PM
1

your argument was that every economic model is top heavy, to which i supplied you an economic model that is not. Your reply is an "Is/Ought" conflation. Due to globalism, it is impossible to supply such an example as any nation attempting it would be subject to international sanctions that would cripple its economy. However, to answer your question, Europe, which has almost no resources left and exports almost entirely finished goods. https://tradingeconomics.com/european-union/exports-by-catego…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:04 PM
1

Every economic model is top heavy (even socialism). https://libcom.org/library/the-conquest-of-bread-peter-kropotkin
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:12 PM
1

stop buying iPhones. No one forces people to buy things This is incredible, please, direct me to this magical land where i can acquire food, clothing and shelter without having to purchase any raw materials, land or finished products. I aware your reply urgently!
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:07 PM
1

http://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/George/grgPP4.html#Book%20I,%20Chapter%203 It is at first glance evident that the economic meaning of the term wages is lost sight of, and attention is concentrated upon the common and narrow meaning of the word, when it is affirmed that wages are drawn from capital. For, in all those cases in which the laborer is his own employer and takes directly the produce of his labor as its reward, it is plain enough that wages are not drawn from capital, but result…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:05 PM
1

that statement is incredible. That is not even remotely how inflation works, please go study economics and come back, ty.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:56 PM
1

Um, do you not understand how supply and demand function? Does the price of corn change significantly depending on the size of the seller? Paper? How about cars? Then why the hell would labor change depending on he seller? The greed of the one percent is not the "factor" it is he cause. If i get stabbed by a thief, the knife is the factor, the greed is the cause. In the same way, feminism over supplied the market with workers, debasing wages below their market efficient rate. The oversupply is t…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:54 PM
1

Yes, if someone steals my car, i expect it to be returned, that why we have a government instead of running around stabbing each other with pointy sticks. If someone uses a financial instrument to steal my wages, then i still expect it to be returned, even if they system is more complex.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:45 PM
1

google "Rent Seeking" please.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:44 PM
1

shrugs, very well, lets take the average return for the S&P then, which comes to 10 trillion dollars, assuming people in Madagascar have index funds. Your still short several trillion dollars there. ANd if you only count the regions where things like mutual funds are likely to occur, (IE the us and europe) then you are not back down to 1.5 trillion accounted for. Seriously, it is not the "stalwart middle classes" that see this boon. trust me, i am in those stalwart middle classes.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:38 PM
1

name one Other then Bitcoin
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:16 AM
1

https://www.credit-suisse.com/corporate/en/articles/news-and-expertise/global-wealth-report-2017-201711.html The total growth in wealth in the last year was 16 trillion. Assuming a return of 5% after inflation, then the 70 million people comprising the global 1% would have earned a total of 2.4 trillion off og their 770k investments. Your presumptions account for less then 1/6th of the sum we are looking for. Please try again.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:02 AM
2

my sincere thanks sir, i have been arguing for years that feminism was a distraction, if not openly complicit in class antagonisms. http://i.imgur.com/NXyCio7.gif SInce the entry of women into the labor market, the share of economic growth going to workers has done nothing but fall. I interpret this as a massive oversupply of labor. http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg More shockingly, this collapse has occurred entirely at the expense of men for no gain by women at all.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:06 PM
1

I am literally having exactly the same discussion with the guy above you... Please look at that responce.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:30 PM
1

This is one of those times when I wish youtube did not have hard bans for self posted youtube, I actually did a video on this. The problem with this is supply and demand. As the volume of a commodity supplied increases,its price falls. Thus, since labor is a supply, the more hours are worked the less each hour is worth. This is incidently why women cannot find any "good men" any more, as the entered the market in competition, mens wages collapsed. The phenominonalso happened to wheat farmers pri…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:29 PM
1

what made you think i was talking about women? 30% of men simultaneously join an uprising, that's going to get serious REAL FAST.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:55 PM
2

Ask them if they are willing to recognize that half of all Inter Partner Violence if Female on Male. https://www.cdc.gov/violencepr.../pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:50 PM
1

http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Shays'_Rebellion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion https://i.pinimg.com/736x/fe/20/e4/fe20e4613d3a313fc371f0b64843324b.jpg http://www.wtv-zone.com/civilwar/condraft.html "On October 11, the Confederate Congress amended the draft law to exempt anyone who owned 20 or more slaves." Do i seriously need to go digging through redpill to find posts explaining how low status men have always been thrown under the bus to benefit high status men?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:02 PM
-2

actually it would end in a violent revolutionary overthrow of the government, similar to shays rebellion. Those who have no say in the laws have no reason to follow the laws, and continued lawless behavior will either increase the prison system till it is functionally a welfare state or damage the GDP till we are shrinking rather then growing....or both. Also, you DO understand the military exists solely to destroy mens bodies to benifit wealthy oil interests right? Lastly, only when mens contri…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 05:16 PM
4

I like to give them clicks when they manage to get something right. There must be a carrot with the stick or they simply run madly in circles.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:00 AM
1

Eventually, overcome by her emotions at the way the night was going, she told him, “You guys are all the fucking same,” and left crying. And we have now reached the India standard that if a man does not want a committed relationship, all sex is rape....or was that the Victorian standard. Seriously, feminism is now openly reactionary.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 05:13 AM
0

THIS...RIGHT...HERE...is why we need a UBI. Allow men to claim government benefits and stop contributing until the balance is restored. ONLY when mens contribution CANNOT be taken for granted will this get fixed. You can SOB about tax reform all you want to, all it will do is take benefits away from men. You are not an island, we do need public roads and schools, it is time to address UBI seriously.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:44 AM
1

yes, there is a reason i keep saying they are neo fuedalists and no communists. Traditionalist shaming came out of efforts to protect the olde regime of France, where sovereign authority was linked to the divine wisdom of the king. You will also note that feminists go completely apeshit if you imply that women are as capable of violence as men are. The are not interested in socializing anything, they want to claim the mantel of divine wisdom for themselves.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 04:31 PM
0

that's the number that obtained a degree, it says nothing about getting a job in their field...
/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:37 AM
7

Please look up the definition of "Post hoc ergo Propter hoc" Unions are the only reason we had nuclear families in the first place. In fact lemme do my own study right now... https://familyinequality.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/median-income-by-age-and-gender.jpg http://heritageaction.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Union-Participation.jpg See, there we go, only since the decline of unions have median wages for men stagnated. OH, also from the abstract at the top of the page I…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 04:34 PM
2

AND somone does not understand 101 level marxism! "Opportunities" are merely the exploitation of the poor, that is in order to "Take Advantage" of an "Opportunity", you inevitably need a large force of below market labor to do most of the actual work, and where you forced to pay them at a reasonable rate, then the "Opportunity" would no longer be profitable. Oh, and education is completely meaningless, less then 10% of US adults went to college, got a degree, and have ajob in the field they stud…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 04:14 PM
2

ty for the info, but i genuinely consider this good practice. I actually time myself seeing howl ong it takes me to get through such arguments and come up with effective responses so when i encounter someone who is actually trying to undermine our work i am prepared.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:44 PM
1

Ok, i am going to try and getyou to understand this one more time. THERE IS no equilibrium. It has never been proven. It has never been shown in any experiment to exist, because no experiments have ever been conducted. No model has ever attempted to falsify it. Further, even a casual examination of historical prices reveals that the concept of equilibrium is incoherent, prices fluctuate all over the map with little reference to any fixed point. "Equilibrium" is simply a rationalization that what…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:42 PM
3

OK, first of all, thank you for the correct name for the wheat farmers. After that you stop making sence. IF the price is falling, this means that the market is over supplied, and thus cannot result in a famine as it already has to much wheat. Second, it benefits only speculators, it does not benefit the buyer to not have wheat farmers at all in a few years as this will raise prices and then you will have a famine. SO functionally all you have argued is why speculative bubbles benefit speculator…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 01:13 AM
3

I am actually incredibly well studied in economics thank you (if you would like me to explain how micro-foundations institutionalizes negative externalizes i will happily do so). What your sumation fails to take into consideration is the "Curse of the Wheat Farmers" (I might have an official name, i have never heard it). The curse of the Wheat farmers refers to the wheat boom in the United States in the 1920s. Wheat farmers saw increased yields in the face of flat demand, and as a result, even t…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:49 PM
1

yes, in that case it would be an entitlement. That is the obligation to serve int he military would be matched by the entitlement to vote. However, if no one had to sign up, then it would be a right. I am not answering IF voting ought to be one or the other, i am merely explaining a difference.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:52 PM
6

I think you are failing to understand that the impracticability of the situation is the point. By demanding men pay tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars without ensuring their income, you place men in an impossible position. All this proposal does is shift the burden of that possession off of men who are disposable onto companies which are not disposable, it does not alter the burden in any way. And this is the important part! Suddenly, when the burden is placed on someone who society t…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:45 PM
1

yes, to me they are one in the same. As i said, all obligations come with entitlements, that is, the burdens imposed by society must be matched with the resources necessary to meet those burdens. Further, because we live with only finite resources, society cannot guarantee resources beyond the most basic level without requiring contrition in some form. Thus, every obligations requires and entitlement, and every entitlement requires and obligation.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:38 PM
-2

should i be forced to vote regardless of whether i want to or not? If yes, then it is an entitlement. If no then it is a right.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 07:47 PM
1

your cnfusing rights with entitlements, but other then that i agree. All obligations come with entitlements, a duty is matched by a duty. Put more simply, i have a RIGHT to a fair and impartial trial, it does not matter if i have or have not followed the law, i have the same right, it is not contingent on any duty on my part. However, if i am required to seek employment regardless of if i want to or not, then i am entitled to employment. IT would go a very long way to ending alimony and child su…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 06:16 PM
5

ty i was just about to make this point. The reason that men traditionally worked and women did not is that while a man is perfectly happy to feed, cloth and house a non working spouse, a women is not. There are not magical infinite jobs, if there where you would have to pay janitors hundreds of dollars an hour to scrub toilets because who the hell would willing do that if they had any other options.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 07:40 PM
3

As a communist, we absolutely opposed IDPOL as divisive. It has actually become something of an internal meme, with those opposing IDpol being branded "Manachists" or "Brochialists" by those supporting it. But by the same token, i cannot include feminism under liberalism as feminism seeks to increase control by social elites and liberalism seeks to decrease it. and you are welcome, if you ever need help again, please, do not hesitate to fine me. I am glad to help anyone to the extent that i can.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 12:21 AM
2

Totally different concept. This is like someone getting trad con, Neo Con, and Libertarian confused. When communists say "Liberals get the bullet too" they are referring to NEO liberals, IE the rabid supporters of globalized free trade (it is still totally unjustified, but they are not referring to say classical liberals or social democrats). Liberalism, (Either classical or otherwise) refers to removing social/group stigmas and creating a society based upon the assumption that all people are/ou…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 12:09 AM
22

please stop confusing this garbage with liberalism, ty.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 09:04 PM
1

Can I get a source onn this?
/r/MensRights28/12/17 08:34 PM
1

ANd light is finally dawning
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:32 AM
3

ty, i am glad i did not have to point that out. THese people know NOTHING about starwars lore....AT ALL!
/r/MensRights24/12/17 11:54 PM
9

TY! was about to say that.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 11:53 PM
8

well that kid is going to be fucked up for life...
/r/MensRights24/12/17 11:51 PM
2

i was actually going to do a breakdown of this, but your response sums it up so nicely. I can add literally nothing to it.. well done sir/mam.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 05:42 PM
1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2964586/Scientists-say-make-human-egg-skin-two-men.html They have shown that it is possible to make human egg and sperm cells using skin from two adults of the same sex. I am very well aware of the advancement of technology rendering this stratagem moot. I am referring my comment to within the assumptions the author is making. Frankly, i would openly welcome this advancement (IE two men being able to produce a child) as it would render the abortion debate …
/r/MensRights16/12/17 11:49 PM
3

the problem with this idea is that it is nonsensical. IF you reduce the population to 10m/90f, then you will be back at previous levels in no time as every male will be able to impregnate multiple females. You achieve nothing. IF you where actually serious about doing population control this way, the solution would be reduce the FEMALE population, as every female can only be impregnated by one male at one time. This is a perfect example of how feminism could not possibly care less about the issu…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:44 PM
1

ROFL that is awesome, i work in truckdriving, in the last few years they have removed the long tailpipes of the back of the trucks and vented he exhaust out the bottom, straight into the face of anyone unhitching a trailer. I knew it was making my throat worse, but this is even better.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:39 PM
1

reason #1295 why the MrM cannot be conservative.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:37 PM
31

If the article your talking about is here then please allow me to break this down for people. 1. It affects probably everyone you know. Begging the question, I would actually be extremely surprised if this where the case given that estimates of infidelity are at 20% of marriages and that this is born out by a divorce rate of 40% with half of those being due to infidelity. So this would effect less then 1/5th of people, at most. 2. Cheating is way more complicated than most people think. SO is Nu…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:29 PM
11

The hilarious part is that feminism is nothing if not a massive and obvious power grab. Second hilarious part, think for a second, what is training boys in this manner going to require? A full time stay at home parent that's what. And it can;t be dad, he is is part of the problem. Feminism just declared women's "Independence" a failure.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:40 PM
3

at least they are finally listing the number of men it is happening to.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:37 PM
1

reasons conservatives are not our friends #1257
/r/MensRights10/12/17 07:10 PM
3

IF they are willing to do this to another female (one of their special protected ingroup) what would they be willing to do to men?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:15 PM
2

ok, however the difference is that most STD's are merely unpleasant, HIV will kill you. Waving a coat hanger around in a store is not a crime, waving a loaded gun around is. It is not the action that makes a thing illegal, it is the consequences fo that action, this is why we have to show criminal intent in trials.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:13 PM
3

Didn't we just have an article here about how the majority of sexual abuse against boys is female.....oh wait, yes we did
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:21 AM
3

this is one of those times when i REALLY REALLY wish reddit did not have hard bans on self posting youtube. I did a video on this about a year ago, functionally, this women is turning her nose up at $30000 a year in cost of living savings over a $3000 piece of rock. http://livingwage.mit.edu/metros/12060 Cost of living for 2 adults 2 children living together $53,000 Cost of living for 2 adults 2 children living separately $83,500 Nuclear family savings ; $30,000 annually But no, she wants her sh…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:55 PM
8

https://imgur.com/a/H5Q5u This article is a case of post hoc, ergo propter hoc. Males labor force participation was dropping LONG before the opioid crisis hit. However what DID precede the male dropoff was the collapse of mens wages as a share of their output. If i am earning half of what my grandfather earned, why would i not be half as interested in working hard. The closure of the wage gap has occurred entirely at the expense of men for no gain by women at all, it is no wonder men are less in…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:55 PM
13

If this was the same Cracked that used to be a trade paperback opposite MAD magazine, then this is truly a shame. Those where two of the funniest publications of their age.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 05:27 PM
2

I mean traditional values like men being expected to die in wars, provision women even after the marriage is annulled, and work the worse jobs imaginable to support a family they might not have wanted. I do not question if feminism lead to a rise in divorces, i question whether feminism reflects liberal values, specifically reciprocal and mutual obligation. Also, it is not divorces we are objecting to, it is alimony, child support, and the presumption of division instead of the presumption of pr…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 09:04 AM
2

Traditional values come from the republican party, all republicans here are working against mens interests.... see the problem there?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:52 AM
2

please stop getting fuedalism and leftism confused, ty. Feminism is a neo fuedalist movement, it cares more about social status then outcomes. Leftism is an outcomes directed movement. BIG difference.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:51 AM
1

http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/lifestyle/content/633929/teenage-males-experience-sexual-violence-more-than-females-study-shows/story/ https://squawker.org/culture-wars/ucla-shock-study-women-have-raped-3-6-million-american-men/
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:22 PM
2

Well first, there would not be extra money for children. If you want children, you have to work. 15000 is enough for a single adult to live very modestly, someone trying to raise a child on ubi would be a form of neglect, and treated as such.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 03:15 AM
1

Universal Basic Income. The idea is that every adult gets a check for $15000 a year from the government, replacing all current social programs. If you want a house, a car and a family, you still have to work, but if all you want is an appartment and some ramen, please, stay home. The idea is that due to efficency wages, the net productivity would increase thus paying for the program.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 11:20 PM
3

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT83OHUWsoivvMgMgXAkTZOvKGwLZBqqv0hOkulx6_q0CyWZuSz Trendline man, look at the trendlines
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:37 PM
1

that...was a luandry list
/r/MensRights24/11/17 06:43 PM
-4

reason i want a UBI, when she has to foot the bill for the lifestyle of every man she ruins, then her tune will change.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 05:43 PM
1

apparently people do not understand how babies are made...?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:56 PM
9

Men doing better then women is misogyny...men not doing better then women is misogyny! Because different people do not have different skill sets...oh, wait.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:25 PM
67

The men who behave well when Ana is riding her bike in a mini-skirt, do they even see her? Do they perceive that beautiful energy that comes with it? I have my doubts. Feminist complain men are "Objectifying" women by noticing they exist, men stop noticing they exist, women complain men no longer notice they exist. When you make up your mind what you want, we will pay attention again deary.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:47 PM
1

http://livetheorganicdream.com/texas-school-triples-recess-time-solves-attention-deficit-disorder/
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:51 PM
1

pass a universal basic income and i have not one objection to this.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:19 PM
2

we where banned from reddit? /me looks around Nope pretty certain we are still here.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 05:43 PM
3

Conservatives are not our allies, they never where, i do not understand how pual made this mistake, but he did. The American conservative movement is interested in the rich, everyone else is expandable to that goal.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:11 AM
2

I am going to do a video on this later, but the short version is the equality of opportunity is a completely incoherent concept that has no basis in the real world. To have equality of opportunity, you would need four things 1) Equality of Aptitudes (why is the most brilliant and inspired janitor not paid as much as the most brilliant and inspired basketball player?) 2) Equality of Capacity ( If there are 2 million 4.0 students but only 1 million college positions, what are the rest to do?) 3) E…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 06:17 AM
1

ty sir, that wll be very useful in burying the "80/20" garbage that keeps showing up here. My profound thanks!
/r/MensRights05/11/17 12:10 AM
3

It is interesting to me thta nearly all of the things listed cost money, butt he amount of income for both is presented as equal. How is it women are doing all these wonderful things and men are not, if both are getting the same amount of money? The answer is obvious, the government programs benefiting women. Scholarships and grants lowering college debt, housng vouchers, rental assistance, special health and insurance programs, all these ensure women can advance faster then men can. And the res…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:13 PM
5

again, we witness women flatly sating they have no interest in equality. For how many generations have men protected and sheltered women, and the instant women have to return the favor; "WHAAAAA!"
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:53 PM
1

Women continue to believe men exist exclusively to finance the lifestyle they would like to become accustomed to.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 05:25 PM
2

DO we know what she was charged with? Because that sounds like involuntary manslaughter, which in the US is a misdemeanor.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 05:23 PM
13

Hrmm, i wonder how much time i would do if i burned a McMansion down...a actresses no less?
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:40 AM
2

It will be a reversal, but it will not be progress. The overwhelming majority of men still believe that they will weather this. When it is made clear to them that feminism is not interested in equality but in violent subjugation of men, then the reversal will be total and uncompromising. I tis feminists themselves that will bring about the Handmaidens Tale, not conservatives.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:22 AM
0

to anyone who believes this has anthing to do with socialism, enjoy. In the same way, those who man the lifeboat do not ask credentials from the crew of a sinking ship; they launch their boat, risk their lives in the raging waves, and sometimes perish, all to save men whom they do not even know. And what need to know them? “They are human beings, and they need our aid — that is enough, that establishes their right — To the rescue! “ The author, like many conflates "Caste" with "Class" becouse th…
/r/MensRights28/10/17 05:15 PM
5

We grew up in very differant communities then.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 12:57 AM
3

the overwhelming majority of domestic violence is female on male. This has been repeatedly confirmed in multiple surveys. But less then half of the problem is the problem...
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:10 PM
1

Awsome, so we both agree this is a push poll then.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 12:28 AM
3

I googled "Denying Rape but Endorsing Forceful Intercourse: Exploring Differences Among Responders" and found half a dozen sources, NONE of which included the questionnaire used. And no, i am not driving 1500 miles to winnipeg to look at something i can view online. I have no more reason to assume they included the questionnaire in their online publication then in their physical publication. And if you do not want people to call your research a push poll, then yes, you really DO need to publish …
/r/MensRights22/10/17 05:18 PM
3

Yes....because popular recognition that the earth is not flat, drowning people does not prove their innocence and the king is not blessed by god to rule unquestioned had no effect on society at all....oh, wait.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 08:55 PM
6

"Denying Rape but Endorsing Forceful Intercourse: Exploring Differences Among Responders" Can these people post the survey they use with their result for fucks sake? you would think that was a requirement when publishing.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 05:28 PM
2

finally, it is becoming recognized
/r/MensRights21/10/17 05:21 PM
2

women are suddenly going to stop seeing the need for social status? Please, continue comrade, i am all ears, how will you get women to stop seeing the need for social status? Because that is what feminism is about, a social status caste hierarchy.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 05:10 PM
1

You are making the same mistake as the proud boys, nothing is a static state. I work in truck driving, give half the guys i know would bail if they had no alimony or chils support and got $15k a year out of the sky? NEarly all of them. as would most of the other people i work with on a daily basis. There would be a MASSIVE shift in labor demographics, which would result in two things. One, a staggering rise in wages as companies suddenly had to compete even for burger flippers, much less anyone …
/r/MensRights21/10/17 05:08 PM
6

No, because the point of feminism was never to deal with that. The point of feminism was to use discrimination and oppression as shields to cover a power grab. This is like surveying a business admin curse and finding 94% of the students could not care less if markets clear efficiency...that's not what they are there for.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:54 PM
1

yeah, lemme repeat myself. These people are not leftists, not marxists, not socialists, these are reactioanry neo fuedalists hiding within the left.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 04:30 PM
0

THis right here is the reason i consider UBI a mens issue. When everyone is GARENTEED a minimal standard of living, Only then will we be able to abolish alimony and child support without adverse consequences to men. And before anyone asks, yes, i genuinely believe it would be cheaper in the long run.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 05:36 PM
3

https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/07/11/sexual-offending-by-women-is-surprisingly-common-claims-us-study/ allo me to help with your meat content sir.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:52 PM
3

reversing the genders on this list is hilarious. Also, The list is jaw dropping ablest, Auspies cannot "learn to read a room".
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:58 PM
2

i bet a digital nuclear bomb would go off if every male who has ever been harassed, assaulted or rapes posted "Me too".
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:33 AM
2

We do not even talk about how many boys are raped, or harassed, or have child support for children they did not want, or are in prison for not being able to pay that support. When you talk about "violence against men" people laugh. You want the focus on mens and boys....awesome, i would love to focus on men and boys....starting right now.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:32 AM
5

All i ask is for you to simply read. https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/07/11/sexual-offending-by-women-is-surprisingly-common-claims-us-study/ Most recently, a 2014 study of 284 men and boys in college found that 43 reported having been sexually coerced, mostly unwanted sexual intercourse, with 95 per cent of the perpetrators reported as being female.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:13 AM
2

i am just going to leave this here. https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/07/11/sexual-offending-by-women-is-surprisingly-common-claims-us-study/
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:58 AM
1

yeah, in order set fire to a building, the fire has to be next to the building. even ten feet distance will not result in a fire spreading. especally with a metal fence in the way. they are just stupid coeds who are going to magically forget they ever did this the instance they are facing "Housewife of Garment worker".
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:50 PM
32

Isn't there stats somewhere showing the overwhelming majority of divorces are initiated by women? oh, yes , ALL OVER THE PLACE!
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:29 PM
1

Action taken by a group from which all of the group benefits equally or proportionally.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 04:38 PM
1

Collective action is the result of 'the concurrence of so many different kinds of labor and skill'? No matter what caused that concurrence? NO, read the quote again. "No one is ignorant of the difficulties that are met with in the conversion of untilled land into arable and productive land. These difficulties are so great, that usually an isolated man would perish before he could put the soil in a condition to yield him even the most meagre living. To that end are needed the united and combined …
/r/MensRights14/10/17 09:27 PM
1

You seem to be conflating cuase and effect. Collective action is the result of that, not its cuase. It cuase is physics, the impossibility of directing enough energy to achieve the goal in question without the concurance. Only with the assistance of dozens or hundreds of people is any production possible. This is not a consiquence of some prior system, but a law of nature as immutable as gravity of thermodynamics.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:09 PM
1

examples? Trust but verify applies to all.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:18 AM
1

Oh boy. Okn we choose to organize society in such a way that the more of a product is sold, the less it is worth. We choose to treat labor as a commodity. We choose to lie to workers and tell them the more hours they sell, the more they will get. All of those are choices, they are not involuntary. The purpose of equal liability to productive labor is to remove the stigma from manuel labor. The purpose of affermative action is to reinforce that stigma. You cannot abolish something by doubling dow…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 10:52 PM
1

Marxist historiography or historical materialism: No, they are not, under materialism, MEN would be the oppressed group becouse they had to sell their labor while women where allowed to not sell if they did not wish to, and WHITE people would be the historically oppressed because the value of the green bits of paper where less then the shelter food and clothing plantation slaves received. I can go get you the 1976 bicentenial census data proving that if you want. And no, i am not a white suprema…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 04:33 PM
4

if ther eis one point i am trying to beat people over the head with for the last few years, it is that these people are not marxists. OK, you quote the manifesto while totally missunderstanding either what you are quoting or what Affirmative action is about. Affirmative action is NOT about truck drivers, or sewer workers, or factory floor machinists. It is about the elite, non productive jobs, the jobs marx wants to abolish. When marx says "Equal Liability of All to Labor. Establishment of Indus…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 06:31 AM
306

FYI i used to live with a single mother who taught her daughter NOTHING about their hair. all three of them ended up with rats nests on the back of their heads and their mother could have cared less, i had to comb it all out and then explain to them they could not just go to bed with we hair after they showered, they had to wait for their hair to dry before lying down.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 07:58 AM
1

Yes becouse that thoery has worked so well with scientologist schools...mormon schools...catholic...muslim...oh, wait, if you have enough private capital behind you, market forces don't matter.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 05:21 AM
1

The problem being that what constitutes a standard cariculum is left to the whim of who ever has the deepest pockets.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 01:15 AM
1

You do understand that privatizing education will only make this problem worse right? See "medrassas"
/r/MensRights06/10/17 08:41 PM
9

What society was it where the peasants where not allowed to look at the royalty? China i think?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:36 PM
2

Two points 1) http://livingwage.mit.edu/metros/19100 THe value of the fod she eats, the clothing she wears, and the living space he would not need if she where not there cost him $14,000 a year. Calculated against a 21 hour work week, this comes to about $13 per hour. Having worked in housekeeping, Food services and Child care, those are jaw droppingly good wages. 2) " Then I tried to gingerly explain the concept of emotional labor: that I was the manager of the household, and that being manager…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 04:35 PM
0

wow i listened to about 10 seconds of that and turned it off. 1) If you sit down with feminists and a copy of The Communist Manifesto and start asking them do they support policy X, Y, or Zed, they will almost immediately announce the book is white male garbage. 2) Under the definition this women has jut given, Fuedalism was Communism because it involved the transfer of wealth by government force...as are contracts and copyrights. This person has no clue what they are talking about and is trying…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:16 AM
1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2964586/Scientists-say-make-human-egg-skin-two-men.html Free at last, free at last.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:14 PM
7

For as Adam was lord of his children, so his children under him had a command over their own children, but still with subordination to the first parent, who is lord paramount over his children’s children to all generations, as being the grandfather of his people. -Robert Filmer Patriarcha THere is no relevant distinction between the philosophy of modern feminists and the philosophies of those who believed kings had absolute power over their subjects. They have merely swapped the genders in quest…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:10 PM
1

wait, so in societies where women can socially advance by marrying up, and men have no form of advancement at all, women are more interested in advancement then men.....I am Shocked, Shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME
/r/MensRights22/09/17 07:08 PM
22

AM i entitled to sex in return for getting a circumcision? Then what women prefer is none of my concern... https://imgur.com/a/9Zxnp hurray, fresh meme for the cuase
/r/MensRights22/09/17 08:31 AM
7

in settings both professional and personal, I am often afraid that my boundaries will not be respected, that I will be expected, once again, to comply with someone else’s desires rather than my own. I work as a class A truckdriver. The reason we now have PAGES of legislation regarding how lon truckers can drive, how may hours of sleep they have to have, what condition the equipment has to be in, is this right here. Men have had to deal with this situation in work, home, life for generations, but…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:27 PM
2

THis is actually a concept that i have been advocating for some time, Titleledge; The idea that all obligations, both positive and negative, come with entitlements, IE must be reciprocal.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:51 PM
1

Yes, but the alimony problem would remain. DO you not remember the ancient tail of the women who could not tell the father of her baby and was allowed to name him because it was convenient to her? Both Mandatory paternity testing and a Universal Basic Income will be necessary in the future, one ot ensure only the biological fathers of children have to pay for them and the second the ensure the supply or workers stays at less then half the population, ensuring wages are high enough that fathers c…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 04:07 PM
1

1) the problem is that there is no evidence. The closest we come is STD rates, which are closer to 2 to 1 then 10 to 1. https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D128 2) If it is provable then we have a major problem on our hands. First, can we demand a right to womens bodies, without granting a right to mens bodies in return? Historically that has not worked to well for men, despite feminist propaganda. If we go the opposite way, how are we dealing with rent seeking and other behaviors, IE …
/r/MensRights17/09/17 03:53 AM
2

Yet another reason i support UBI (Universal Basic Income), It allows the Abolition of all Alimony and child support. And to anyone who thinks this is simply going to result in more divorces...do you actually think these women would settle for 25 - 28k a year? No, they want the house and the car and the wardrobe. Remove all alimony and child support and replace it with a 14k per person stipend from the gov, and the twerps will throw the children at their ex husbands. Which i would assume we can a…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 08:51 PM
7

"Not all women Divorce rape. All women benefit from the constant fear of divorce rape that keeps men controlled, subdued and compliant." Projection, they name is Feminism
/r/MensRights16/09/17 08:36 PM
2

Lol, after decades of saying these people are not progressive, are not socialist, are not communist, conservatives actually start listening.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 10:57 PM
1

http://ukjewishfilm.org/people/peter-rodger/ I cannot seem to get more info on the victims, their names alone obviosly do not tell me much other then gender.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 12:56 AM
3

Can we get citation on that, becouse that right there would be epic. "MRAs are white supremicist becouse a jewish/asain with no MRM ties went on a shooting rampage, killing mostly (white?) Men. This is like that german king trying to order the tides not to rise, or the prime minister telling the emporor of china that a cow was a horse.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 09:35 PM
3

I thought Elliot Rogers was asian....
/r/MensRights14/09/17 03:15 PM
2

Well, look at it this way....they are no longer mistaking r/redpill for us.. SO however small, it is a step in the correct direction.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 03:16 AM
1

What Mall is this so we can confirm please. And Also not shop there.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:04 PM
1

the concept being expressed here is not privilege, it is what i call titleledge. All obligations come with entitlements, society has no authority to impose anything onto anyone without granting them a benefit in return. This is necessary both to limit the power of social elites and ensure no group becomes exploited. That feminism is attacking it speaks volumes about their interest in ending exploitation.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 11:05 AM
3

yes and no. If ou look at it form an actualy socialist perspective (IE only reciprocal and mutual relationships are legitimate) it is an attack on reciprocal relationships. WHy where men paid more then women? Becouse men are obligated to provision 4 people, and women only 3. Why Did men get the vote an not women? Because men where expected to volunteer to die for their country. WHy where men expected to be providers at all? Because women have repeatedly said they would not provision men. The ent…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:52 PM
3

To those calling this a fake, it is not. I have had multiple feminists flatly state this to me, it is one of the reason is do not consider feminism to be leftwing, socialist, or communist. They have no interest in equality, they are interested in a neo feudalistic caste system, a social status hierarchy where men exist only to benefit women and have no right to exist independent of that benefit.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 07:04 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg Data from United States, but still relevant to the argument in question. Apparently someone was left out of the loop.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 07:01 PM
1

Then why are they not more interested in low status jobs?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:15 AM
2

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg
/r/MensRights20/07/17 04:06 PM
2

Well, at least they cannot say misandry is not a thing.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 04:01 PM
3

NM, found them again. why the hell would you move them like that, you can just rework the original page... https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-income-people.html enjoy!
/r/MensRights17/07/17 05:29 PM
10

http://imgur.com/a/M6eJy Question, if my wages have fallen by nearly half, why would my interest in working not also fall by half. Note, i just checked my sources for this, and the government is apparently deleting all the income data for the last 60 years from its servers, it now only has data from 2010 on.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 05:06 PM
2

Is there any way to find the methodology used and what changes where made? Because you know those stats are going to get hurled around as soon as there are a few more years to graph.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:13 PM
1

If you know a decent artist, I have a third panel planned. It shows the center of the fence gone and three people sitting on beach chairs watching through the hole. Underneath it reads "Communism", though you could substitute "Egalitarianism" or "Anarchism" if you like.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 08:38 AM
2

ANd yet people are confused why men are eschewing marriage for random hookups.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:53 PM
23

So the people drawing attention to male rape are banned from the sub for people trying to get help for being raped. This speaks volumes. Have we considered starting an alternative?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:43 PM
1

FOr example, feminism continually declares that men are disruptive, and mens rights advocates doubly so. Also, men "Holding back anger, resentment and rage" is defined as toxic masculinity, not oppression. caring for children is continually presented as "Beyond the ability of men", while we have recently seen women declare that garbage collection and truck driving where beneath them. Explore, explore!
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:41 PM
1

? Is that a sub?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:13 PM
1

It is an ongoing series, I am up to episode 3 now, and since other things are happening, I doubt it will be finished as a series for several years.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:13 PM
5

i have tried to start a few over the years, they never got traction. /TheRealIssues was the last one i jumped on after someone else pointed it out to me. It had a good first few weeks but petered out. If you find some, please let me know. Interestingly, Brocialism, Brochialist, and Brochialists are all taken and sealed private, as are Manarchy, Manarchism, and Manarchist. SOmeone does not want working class men discussing their issues outside of female dominated spaces.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:13 PM
4

AWSOME! ty so much, i have been saying for years, that if women want to work, they have to support an non working partner, now i have the proof i needed.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:35 AM
2

I have many female friends who asked for my advice on what they can do to sparkle the attentions of their man. They told me they always put efforts and take initiatives, but when I ask for examples, they always tell me things like: I wait him naked (then they just stand still without saying anything, demanding that he does everything else) or I wore new lingerie or some other bullshits where they just look at him, and don't say or do anything, then they complain that he doesn't do enough. When I…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 04:58 PM
9

Adverts which would be verboten under the Left Party's watch include those that show beautiful women who are simultaneously “weak, hysterical, dumb, insane, naive, or completely controlled by their emotions.” The real question here is how many feminist politicians will this ban from advertising their campaign?
/r/MensRights26/06/17 04:11 PM
2

https://medusamagazine.com/youre-a-bigot-if-you-wouldnt-have-sex-with-a-gay-friend Anyone even passingly familiar with the idea of consent would be horrified by this article. Satire, done poorly by people who have little clue who they are saterizing. I love ho nearly everyone who replied spotted that. “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you k…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 04:28 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=boko&restrict_sr=on https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=Disabled&restrict_sr=on https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=LGBT&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all Well, that took me 5 seconds....it so nice watching lazy people be lazy...
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:48 PM
3

SOurce?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:39 PM
8

both assume that being forced to sell your labor under threat of starvation is some form of privilege....so functionally, there are no socialist feminists. I am actually doing a you tube series on this currently. As for the wage gap, it is an issue i really wish we would pay attention to more. http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg It has closed entirely at the expence of men for no gain by women at all.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:56 AM
1

ty, this goes on the stack of "Feminism is neo fuedalism". From First treaty of government, quoting robert filmer. And first, as it was vested in Adam, he says, “Not only Adam, but the succeeding patriarchs, had, by right of fatherhood, royal authority over their children, p. 12. This lordship, which Adam by command had over the whole world, and by right descending from him the patriarchs did enjoy, was as large and ample as the absolute dominion of any monarch, which hath been since the creatio…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:37 AM
3

"The resurrection and the life must not be debated!" screamed the theocratic of the 18th century. "The decision of the religions which have sanctioned it is of no effect, because in all ages the priest has submitted to the prince, and the gods have always spoken as the politicians desired" replied Proudhon
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:10 AM
1

please see response to other guy.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 05:22 PM
2

The idea i would propose is that those who do not attend college are allowed a UBI just large enough for one person to live off or, IE $15,000 a year. No child credits, period. If you are happy in a small apartment eating ramen the rest of your life, awesome, go for it. IF you want a family and kids, you will need to get a job. If you thought getting a degree in micro aggression's was a good idea, likewise.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 05:22 PM
12

Reasons why a universal basic income is critical to mens rights. Either everyone gets to work the crappy jobs, or only those who get to good jobs have to work. and before you start up, I AM A TRUCK DRIVER!
/r/MensRights06/06/17 05:17 AM
1

Now now, this is a positive step forward; the article recognises fathers are nessesary.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:27 AM
2

Less then ten percent of the population goes to college, gets a degree, and finds a job in their fiield of study. If you want men to persue college, women out now!
/r/MensRights05/06/17 02:33 AM
15

Yes, that would be the problem. As a nation we just spent $100,000 to train this person for a career they have no intention of staying in. If they went post grad, tripple that. On top of which, the influx of candidates has forced colleges to be more picky, denying spaces to people who, while not as qualified on paper, might be more likely to actally stay in their career.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 09:31 PM
7

what has always struck me about the fearless girl statues is how it represents the total dilution that is feminism. You can be as fearless as you want, if that was a real girl and a real bull she would be dead 30 seconds after that still frame.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:49 PM
0

It's been shown that women become pickier and more demanding as income rises and societies become more equal. Question...where?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 04:13 AM
3

Lemme claarify. I have planned and organized an 80 person staff running 15 projects in only 3-5 hours a week. I maintain my claim, if you think planning and organizing is a full time job, you suck at planning and organizing.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:29 PM
31

I drive truck....Route planning takes me about 20 minutes without a nav system...5 minutes with one. I have also run a dozen student orgs, several simultaneously, which rarely took more then 2 hours a week each. If planning and organizing is a full time job, you suck at planning and organizing.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:09 AM
1

Because that is what kings have always done? What, you think William the Conquerer actually fought anyone himself at hastings?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:14 PM
3

"Grown africans are upset over a whites only screening of movie"
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:31 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg Keep in mind, this is not because women are getting more, its because men are getting less.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:09 PM
2

yes, and when a women innitiates sex and does not ask for consent, is she a rapist as well?
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:07 PM
2

ty
/r/MensRights23/05/17 03:52 PM
21

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/29-boys-killed-boko-haram-attacks-boarding-school-nigeria-n37991 Boys have been burned alive in africa for years, but suddenly a women is treated the same way and EVERYONE LOSES THEIR MINDS!
/r/MensRights23/05/17 06:14 AM
1

You keep repeating "begging the question" despite my textbook answer. And you are assuming the text books are not begging the question why? They offer no more evidence then you do. You quoted me about automation, but argued against capitalism. Automation has been happening since the dawn of humanity regardless of economic system. Yes that is my point. Under other systems automation benefits all workers becouse it is used for the whole community. Under capitalism it is a used as a threat to debas…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 04:19 AM
1

Of course prices can be manipulated and people wouldn't know. Diamonds are my favorite example. Price manipulation is no excuse to abandon property rights and free trade. Um, No, Open price manipulation is a very good reason to question whether free trade exists. In any other science at least. This is why I hate discussions with libertarians, you are such ideologues that presenting evidence is pointless. If i presented evidence that, say, you could move faster then light to a physicist, they wou…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 05:52 PM
1

I've made no assumptions. You are assuming markets consist of only two parties, when this is obviously not the case. You assume there is no coercion, when this is obviously not the case. You assume the price agreed is the lowest,when this is obviously not the case. You assume alternative parties are interested in competing, when it is obviously not the case. Though i will agree that open and uninhibited price manipulation goes on all around us every day...which is kinda my point. Your potatoes v…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:11 AM
7

The best example of Misandry to date. Think for a second, have you ever heard a terf worried about women imitating men so they can sneak into the mens bathroom? Neither have I. As far as i am concerned, terf do not hate trans persons persay, they hate men, and use this to justify their hated of those who change genders. I would also like to point out that we are the only place you posted that did not censor this. Welcome to mens rights, we are not nearly as hamfisted as some other issues groups.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:17 AM
1

People have made fortunes without the use of land, Name them. Name one single person that has made a fortune without land, and tell me how they did it. I will tell you what use of land they made. i want economy to decide. THe economy does not decide anything. That is millionaires in towers. And i see no reason to leave such decisions in the hands of people who have every interest in swindling, cheating and robbing me. Nor do i see how mens rights benefits by doing so. many companies have ... pro…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:23 AM
1

i never stated that people should starve to death for my success, thats a typical strawman worthy of a feminist. What i said people should be responsible for themselves, my success is unrelated to others failure. I have already answered this point a dozen time, if you continue to ignore facts sir this conversation is fruitless. "The smallest fortune, the most insignificant establishment, the setting in motion of the lowest industry, demand the concurrence of so many different kinds of labor and …
/r/MensRights18/05/17 04:09 PM
1

Not all fields are overcrowded, there is a huge shortage of IT guys from all IT fields for example, there is still not enough skilled enigneers and high tech workers. THere are 11 million stem graduates working in non stem fields, the overcrowding is everywhere. Also please dont compare me to a murderer who kills for a ferrari, If you propose a moral standard that flaty states that other people should starve to death for your success, then yes, i am going to call you on that. Which is WHAT YOU D…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 05:18 PM
1

The argument you seem to ignore is that people are lazy and they dont want to work. No it doesn't. Please sit down, read, and think. About flooding the market thing, this is another thing you ignore, you ignore the reality. No, i don't. If all we have is enough for everyone to work and live, then that is reality. What right have you to say to someone else that they must starve to death so you can own a ferrari? Also, ALL fields are overcrowded, please read argument 1 again.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 08:13 AM
1

That was staggeringly incoherent. Ok, apparently you are not understanding two things. First, how markets set prices, and second, that land is not infinite. http://imgur.com/a/aQhVq When people sell in competition with each other, the price changes as supply moves. The same is true of demand, when people buy, the price changes. Now, labor is a supply. SO, let us say that the entire market consists of one family. Now, since the consumption of the family is going to be generally the same (Do i REA…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 05:07 PM
1

Why cant we just improve how we educate people so those "poor souls" you are talking about could open up their own busines instead of depending on "evil enterprenuer" to hire them? I would love nothing better, that was the concept behind Trade Unionism. However, as we observed last month with youtube, and about a million time before that, large actors like being large actors and will use any means necessary, free market or not, to keep their market share. Socialism fixes nothing, it just redistr…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 04:08 PM
1

And the cult of women wursting arrives. 5000 sample population is low
/r/MensRights15/05/17 12:11 AM
6

Reasons i hate that sub SO MUCH!
/r/MensRights14/05/17 04:00 PM
3

WHen the hell was he even looking at this page? What the bllop page was he looking at? Mat 11th was thursday, we had no hitler meme's on here Thursday. Fake kill all men post? THere was a post about four women BEATING a man to death after cutting off his balls and making him eat them. Where the hell did the numbskulls look?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 03:56 PM
18

Wait, you mean women are so OBSESSED with social status they cannot be marry low status men or have babies with them? Shocked SHOCKED i say!
/r/MensRights14/05/17 03:39 PM
2

In context of a survey in england, yes it does. Half said that if they became pregnant by another man but wanted to stay with their partner, they would lie about the baby’s real father. Forty-two per cent would lie about contraception in order to get pregnant, no matter the wishes of their partner. And an alarming 31 per cent said they would not tell a future partner if they had a sexual disease: this rises to 65 per cent among single women. Women do not and have never respected mens consent, th…
/r/MensRights14/05/17 07:05 AM
2

CHeck twitter for "Men are Trash"
/r/MensRights14/05/17 04:20 AM
6

Hilariously enough the entire "Men are Trash" meme started over a couple of women getting treated exactly the same as men in Africa have been treated for years. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/29-boys-killed-boko-haram-attacks-boarding-school-nigeria-n37991
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:15 AM
2

ty, i was about to ask for citation.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:25 PM
1

I feel like I'm arguing with a 14 year old. Your mistakes are only outdone by your hubris. likewise. Just because you think you have a counter example does not mean that the argument was "being the question". Begging the question You are assuming markets set prices efficiently in all cases when there are clear and obvious cases when they do not. You have absolutely no idea what capitalism is. Capitalism is a system where the state protects the ownership rights of the few, thus allowing them to s…
/r/MensRights13/05/17 04:43 PM
0

There's plenty of evidence. The more socialist a country is the worse of it is. The more capitalist the better Begging the question. Russia is extremely capitalist right now and its a human rights shitshow. Ditto saudi arabia. Most of europe has extensive social protections, and is doing quite well. An efficient price is equal to the price that two parties agree to for a trade. Also a tuatology. How would you tell if the price was not efficient but one of the parties was coerced? If prices aren'…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 06:17 PM
0

Begging the question. You are assuming markets set prices efficiently, what evidence is there to support that? Every time i argue this issue, the tautology "Markets set prices efficiently because markets set prices efficiently" comes up. Let me give a simple example, are you familiar with the addage "An ouce of prevention is worth a pound of cure"? Why then should janitors (who prevent the spread of infectious diseases) not get paid 16 times what doctors do? Without resorting to the above tautol…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:04 PM
1

The thing is a simple laborer has no real skill and can be easily replaced, So...they are disposable...which is exactly the point i made before. If we are going to end MALE WORKER disposability, then we must adopt socialism, a system which ensures shelter, food and clothing to all. a CEO can live without a single laborer How? Will he grow all his own food? Build his own house? Mine the iron, smelt it, cast it, forge it into tools, all by himself, while still hunting and growing his subsistence? …
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:25 PM
0

Um no, not freezing and starving to death force you to interact to combine labor, what are you talking about? Did you make every single thing you own yourself? I very much doubt that.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:14 PM
6

Humans are by definition a social species, combining labor to produce a greater result. How does a system which recognizes that all those who contribute to that combined product deserve a share in it violate that nature?
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:09 AM
0

ah hominems are the sign of an argument lost, sir. The fact that you start with them....
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:07 AM
1

explain, without ad hominems this time. We already have arguments that men are no longer necessary to society. Historically socially undesirable men have been used as cannon fodder in wars, or shipped off on dangerous and likely fatal enterprises. Just this month we saw posts on MGTOW declaring that short men had no right to exist. How is this a non sequiter, that those considered disposable will be the first to be disposed of?
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:05 AM
2

I live in the united states. Do you have any idea the likelyhood of germany winning an invasion? They could not eve beat russia, and russia was using horses and biplanes at the start of the war.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:05 AM
1

https://librivox.org/the-conquest-of-bread-by-peter-kropotkin/ One of the things I respect about athiests is that they read the relevant texts before critequing them.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:03 AM
3

Said a drunk who nearly destroyed his nation if a bunch of former colonists had not dicided to share their production with him.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 02:26 AM
2

You do know dostoyevsky wrote dry satire right? Let's try a slightly more nuanced definition. Now, suppose that this daily social task consists in the ploughing, hoeing, or reaping of two square decameters, and that the average time required to accomplish it is seven hours: one laborer will finish it in six hours, another will require eight; the majority, however, will work seven. But provided each one furnishes the quantity of labor demanded of him, whatever be the time he employs, they are ent…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 11:17 PM
2

You seem to be confusing marxism/socialism with fuedalism. Socialsim states that what is produced by all should be shared by all. The original formulation was, "from each according to their abilities, to each according to their contributions."
/r/MensRights11/05/17 10:55 PM
1

No, I am quite serios. As men are the "disposable" sex, any shortfall will result in men being disposed of. Thus, we must ensure shelter, food and clothing to all in order for men to no longer be disposable.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 10:51 PM
1

i know in the united states you have a right to a lawyer, does this apply in australia as well?
/r/MensRights11/05/17 03:50 PM
1

Re means again. Spect means To Look. This person apparently does not understand word usage, because when you do not agree with someone is exactly the time you need to respect them.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 03:48 PM
4

when sexual paranoia doesn’t have any predictable political valence. Ahhh, but ti does have economic valence. If you understand that economic opportunities are necessarily zero sum, then every male denied an opportunity is a female who gets one. IF you are targeting high status (IE rich) males who are more likely to succeed, then the number of "successful" females must increase.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 03:38 PM
5

Well, we now know what a women considers a mans life to be worth, $50.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 07:29 PM
4

Can i point out that forcing someone to have sex in a manner they would not consent to freely is rape under every definition of consent feminists have proposed?
/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:14 AM
2

Dark ages happened for a reason. Religion really, really fucks people up.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:55 PM
1

Lol, you think limited government can include coercive enforcement of property without social programs to mitigate the effects, but I am still talking to you.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 07:59 PM
2

https://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_houses The republican party control the majority of state legislatures, both houses of congress and the white house, and you think they are loosing? 0.o Oh, and having read Marx, Proudhon, George, and half a hundred other social theorists, let me assure you those people are NOT progressives. The most closely resemble the theories of Robert Filner, the idea that society should be ruled by a royalty blessed with infinite wisdom and goodness by …
/r/MensRights05/05/17 03:54 PM
1

oh boy. You really need to work on remedial logic. Begging the question means you are assuming the answer to be true, so yes, thinking you already know an answer that might be totally false is begging the question. Under traditional marriage, a man supported a woman he chose to support. Under leftism, men support all women regardless of their choice. It is clear which one is better for men. No, its not. First, google "Shotgun Wedding" please. Traditional Marriage was historically arranged marria…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 03:46 PM
1

yes, that was my point. Put the real conference directly opposite this garbage to create a counter point.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 03:13 PM
2

Assuming everything you say to be true, then the appropriate action is for us to move left. nono, hear me out. You are asserting that the right is peaking and the left is bottoming out. Thus, the right is a glut of interests (frequently conflicted) and the left is in tatters. Whomever places themselves at the center of the left RIGHT NOW will dictate left wing politics for decades, where as even getting near the center of right wing politics will be next to impossible due to the jockeying. We co…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 07:25 AM
5

Bureaugamy Non sequiter. Also, begging the question. You are assuming traditional marriage was a reasonably equitable deal for men, i have an ancestry of coal miners who would disagree with that. Second, your assuming small government conservationism would benefit the majority of men...coal miners would like to disagree there too. Third, your assuming that "Marriage of the individual to the state" is the long term goal of left leaning individuals. I assure you it is not. Lastly, even if all of t…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 07:21 AM
5

As if a bunch of women get to decide the reproductive rights of men....If this is not a massive troll, it is hippocracy on an epic scale. That said, my personal opinion that feminism is a gang of reactionary neo fuedalists will go a long way to validation if this is serious. Edit; should we consider announcing the international mens conference for the same city at the same time?
/r/MensRights05/05/17 07:09 AM
2

No Opinion? No Responsibility!
/r/MensRights05/05/17 07:00 AM
5

I love how they think gender flipping feminism's exceptions of men is "Trolling", instead of realizing that this should be sounding massive alarm bells.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 06:37 AM
7

look at the original, i gender swapped it remember?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 04:35 PM
1

ty fixing!
/r/MensRights04/05/17 03:59 PM
2

where was this from?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 06:37 AM
1

Roots and branches man, roots and branches. If we focus on Institutional, they will argue that its an old guard, of we focus on commentators, they will argue not all feminists. We must do both.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 04:43 AM
3

yeah, i am going to do an entire takedown on that link later
/r/MensRights02/05/17 05:26 PM
5

having had the laboring class rise up against them already, the elite need a system to to hurl into prison or kill any member of the working class who dares suggest they stop working quite so hard.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 04:40 PM
3

no, it is necessary. Very frequently you will get feminists arguing they are trying to address male victimization, and you need ready evidence to show that significant number of feminists do not even recognize that men can be victimized.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 04:39 PM
1

"Men voted for trump" = "men are not doing what we want" = "men need to be shamed more" = " invent some new horrible thing to shame men with"
/r/MensRights27/04/17 09:57 PM
1

They need something to shame men for because men are not doing what they want again. This has nothing to do with anything happening before last january.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 05:03 PM
2

Yeah, ROK is pretty much a collection of people who believe they are morally superior to 90% of humanity and behave accordingly. They are the epitomy of stopped watches being right twice a day.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 12:43 AM
1

PUA stands for Pick Up Artist, it is the philosophy the redpill reddit espouses. If you know who Roosh V is or read ReturnoftheKings.com it is pretty much the same ideals, little to none of which have even the slightest relation to mens rights. Roosh and company are interested in benifiting a small handful of very attractive/wealthy men, while mens rights is concerned to the guy who just shattered his themur working in a construction site, or caught a life threatening disease while picking up ga…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:18 PM
2

A gang of foaming narcissists who would happily throw 80% of men under the first bus they saw if it meant getting laid for the weekend. Lemme be clear here, Mens Rghts relationship with PUA is like Internationalists relationship with TERF's. They are allowed to stay solely by dint of the fact that no one seems to be able to get them to understand the direction of the door.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 10:32 AM
2

Virtue Signalling refers to the public expression of an opinion on a given topic primarily for the purpose of displaying one’s moral superiority before a large audience to solicit their approval. Approval for what? Why do i care if others approve of me or not? What use is there approval to me? Can i eat their approval? Can i burn it to heat my house? Can i cut it into sheets to stay warm? it has been criticized by some as a shallow attempt at improving social status within a particular group. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 10:20 AM
2

If you are familiar with lockes "first treaty of government" then you are familiar with virtue signaling. ?irtue signaling is the arguement fielded by robert filner, who locke was replying to. Summarised "person or group has majical secret knowledge which grants others do not posess. This means their pronouncements upon subject are always correct, even if other find them completely incoherant, becouse others do not posess magical secret knowldege. Posession of this knowledge is indicated by repe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 02:29 AM
1

Did we ever find those number PualE was talking about with Prison rapes exceeding those outside of prison?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:51 PM
5

I have no clue what South Africa’s Centre for Development and Enterprise is, but i have just lost every shred of respect for them. NM, it is a conservative think tank. This is why we cannot achieve anything by moving to the right, whatever pual says. They are beholden to the business lobby. If a muli billion dollar magazine (Huffpo is owned by Verision) comes to them and tell them to shut us down, we get shut down, that simple. Liberals, while lousy with feminists, will at least usually stand up…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:02 PM
2

Yeah, except the largest group ISN'T white men, its native americans...so much for oppression counting for something.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:04 AM
11

"Given that survivors increase their chances of being maimed or killed if trying to physically resist the rape, this bill will clarify that a victim of rape does not have to fight the perpetrator or put up physical resistance in order for the court to hand down a guilty verdict," I remember a study showing that if a rape victim fought back, it increased the likely hood of the rapist running like hell. Anyone have source?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:03 AM
2

I will agree that the constitution is a very flawed document. Its due process protections are not one of the flaws.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 09:11 PM
5

Allison thinks that college boy ineptitude boils down to basic laziness “The average man sees that everything is about him. Men never bother to think about women. Unsurprisingly, they never learn about women.” REALLY? How many of those 16 boys did you offer to teach how to go down on you? Oh...none? Evanie recognizes similar narcissistic behaviors in many of the college boys whom see interacts with on a day to day basis. “It’s a general theme that their sense of self-importance outweighs their a…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:37 PM
3

Remember, we are not only speaking to the gender idealog's, but to a wider audience.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:01 PM
23

Actually, this is incredibly helpful to us. If you look at statistics and hold emotional and verbal violence on par with physical violence, the primary victims of domestic abuse are men. This push allows us to trap them into addressing the issue on our terms. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf
/r/MensRights18/04/17 07:02 AM
1

1) that is a very subjective question. In what period? In what place? By what metric? In the united states at the present time under a basic Mazlows needs construction? NO! Men are subject to a host of social, political and economic expectations that continually place them in danger of physical, mental and emotional harm that women are no where near subject to. The Majority of people being denied their teir 1 and 2 mazlows needs are men. I do not even need to citations here, all i need is to poi…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:18 AM
1

Becouse these people are using the language of socaliam to push this garbage, I am going to write a counter here. First, it is impossible in socialist theory to "steal" land. Land is the common property of all, any who shows up and finds lands not being used has the right to make the best use of that land, assuming they leave it in as good a condition as they found it. So the arguement about white men stealing anything is trash. Second, the goal of socialism is control of the means of production…
/r/MensRights14/04/17 06:26 PM
1

Pass a universal basic income FIRST and i have no objections. When i am no longer expected to contribute anything to society, you can do whatever you please with it.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 04:52 PM
3

Congradulations! You have successfully confused Mensrights with The_Donald. Milo is a reactionary troglydite with as much relation to mens rights as donald duck. Most of the members of this board are center left when last we polled, and breitbard equaly disinterests me ( and probobly most others).
/r/MensRights11/04/17 11:52 PM
3

You will not find me expousing sex robots for anyone. Edit: also, the point here is not the efficacy of the robots themselves, but the implicite presumption through out the article that men have no need to exist if women do not benifit from that existance. Which is an entirely seperate question btw.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:36 PM
9

Also, its amazing how fast the whole "Robots cannot consent!"argument went out the window.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 05:10 PM
2

I have three uncles who crawled into a bottle and had to be dragged back out again entirely due to exactly the same situation. I empathize, which is why I am a mens rights activist. And it is to create a world where men cannot be trapped like that that i work, and will continue to work, until is does exist.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:09 AM
3

Do I advocate miscarages. No. I also do not advocate whomever caught broc turner beating the shit out of him, but I understand why it happened. Whether he was drunk is irrelevant. Provided you are awake,alcohol does not negate consent, if it did I have rape charges against 12 differant women to file. LYING negates consent. I am assuming your mother is intelegent enough to know what time of the month it is and either a) did not inform him or b) lied when asked about it. Lying to your partener abo…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:11 AM
2

She forced Dad into a relationship by pretty much threatening him with forced child support payments and such, but offered an alternative: marry her and live with her, as per her Christian beliefs, and he could stay with her for free. I am going to point a few things out here. 1) your mother raped your father. Failing to inform someone of a risk related to sex invalidates consent. Sex without meaningful consent is rape. 2) she then mentally and emotionally abused your father. Forcing someone int…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:14 AM
4

That's amazing, and how many feminist studies have we read saying "men are statisticly more likely to rape" after defining rape as penetrative only, or "30% of men would rape if they could" after defining rape as having sex with someone who was mildly drunk. Show me the source data. What are the median values on that graph? What are the mean values? How are you linking SAT with wealth, both cats and dogs have fur, but cats are not dogs. Simply becouse a university has both credentialed and rich …
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:09 PM
4

The only chart i am seeing provided ries to show a link between higher SAT scores and protest, not income. SAT scores are not shown to correlate with income levels in any study i am aware of. Further, the chart does not even show that, because it does not bother to show trend lines, and lower numbers are lost in the clutter of non protesting colleges. I call out garbage research when feminists do it, i will call out garbage research when others do it as well.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 05:04 PM
1

My profound thanks for saving me the effort of typing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 08:47 PM
3

Apparently no one has told you about the honeybadgers....please, allow me to correct this oversight. https://www.youtube.com/user/HoneyBadgerRadio
/r/MensRights05/04/17 06:11 AM
5

This one is going to need context. I attended on of the first colleges to use affermitive consent. I had a simple rule, I would have sex with absolutly any female who initiated everything and asked my consent at every stage. If they felt this consent was totally and completely fair, surely they where comfortable following it themselves. To this day I remember of the the radical lesbians standing in a common room screaming at me becouse I was not trying to have sex with any of her freinds, less t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 12:28 AM
3

Awww, and here I was hoping they would be stupid enough to ask women if they thought it was ok to have sex with a drunken man, or if a man with no shirt on expected to have sex that night...
/r/MensRights04/04/17 11:58 PM
26

I actually fully support what Sandburg is proposing, just not the way she is thinking. Pass a law requiring that every single working female feed, cloth and house a non working partner, and you would see women disappear from the labor market over night. A universal basic income (thus allowing men to quit their jobs at women's expense) would have a similar effect on a longer term. Women do not want to pay for non working men, the popular phrase "Your money is our money, my money is mine" demonstr…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:55 PM
1

https://librivox.org/the-conquest-of-bread-by-peter-kropotkin/ Second wave feminists broke away from communist groups because they where not interested in abolishing exploitation, only in changing who benefited from it. Also, stating capitalism can only be defeated when we liberate women is like saying slavery could only be defeated when we liberate cotton. Totally incoherent gibberish demonstrating that the person speaking has exactly zero clue what the fork they are talking about.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:27 AM
2

I am actually a fairly hard core Anarchist Communist (No, not antifa, Kropotkin). This article will be mast-heading a series i have been meaning to do on youtube about how feminism cannot be anarchist or socialist because 1) it supports unjustified hierarchies as we just saw, and 2) It by entention supports the system of wage slavery necessary for those hierarchies to exist. My profound thanks sir, this is immensely helpful for showing the feminist movement the door out of the vanguard left.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:07 PM
3

I do not even have words here. First, this is anathema to all democratic thinking. It is precisely the period when a handful of "Hyper competent" elites ruled unchecked that is considered the most brutal and pitiless period in history, IE the dark ages. Second, from a left wing perspective, within a capitalist society those who amass the most money and wealth are not the most intelligent, but the most morally bankrupt, IE those who are most willing to brutalize and exploit others for personal ga…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:53 PM
1

“Weldon remains firmly in favour of the ‘bloodless revolution’ that was feminism, but believes that only one woman in three really benefited. ‘By going out to work they halved the male wage, so a male wage no longer supported a family. So women had to go out to work to help support the family.’ http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg I am curios where she found out about this. I had to do a months research to get those tables together on an spreadsheet. I am curios what else is not so widely available...
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:25 AM
3

Some Graphs i made a few years ago illustrate this perfectly. http://i.imgur.com/NXyCio7.gif http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg As you can see, when you flood the market with more workers wages fall off a cliff. PARTICULARLY male wages. This is not a proposal to help anyone, but a proposal to further starve and freeze workers. It is amazing to me that feminists in Australia now sound like conservatives in Wisconsin...its almost like they where never liberals at all. On the plus side, they have final…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 05:06 PM
3

Also the minor detail then when the supply of a commodity (Workers) increases, its price falls.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 04:22 PM
10

"The overwhelming statistics around females and sexual assault – that one in three women will experience physical or sexual violence in their lifetime" Counting getting punched as Physical assault...so have 1 in 1 men. they still have to cling to the "BUT WOMEN HAVE IT WORSE" narrative even while trying to help.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:50 PM
1

Which one? I can see a dozen different agendas saying a dozen different things. The Feminist agenda, yes, is still aping the "Gender is a social construct" because they are a gang of reactionary neo fuedalists who believe society exists solely to benefit its elite and merely want to change who those elite are.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:29 PM
1

it is 2017 right? And we are still having this arguement right? 16 years after it was conclusively proven false right?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:11 AM
3

and that was 16 years ago....
/r/MensRights14/03/17 04:51 PM
3

Re means "Again", spect means "To Look" If I have looked at your movement twice...and it remains incoherent and stupid both times, then telling you your movement is incoherent and stupid IS respecting it.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 04:12 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82RTzi5Vt7w that should help.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 08:28 AM
1

Sex falls into a catagory of things I call "titleledges". A titleledge reflects a reciprocal obligation between people, either indevigually or as a group. In this case, if men can be shamed for failing or refusing to persue sex, then men are entitled to sex. If men are not entitled to sex, they have no obligation to persue it, or recognise as existing any social status heirarchy based on its persuit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 03:34 AM
17

Um, no, forcing someone who does not want to have sex to have sex is rape. Pure and simple. That this needs to be said, here of all places, is really, really worrying.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:09 AM
14

"Cults insist they are the only ones that know the truth about society. They teach ideology that goes against commonly accepted notions while dehumanizing people outside of their group. For an example of this, look no further than feminism. Er, sorry, feminism is not a cult. I mean their definition of feminism." For a brief moment, light shined, reflection occurred, and then darkness consumed this person.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 05:34 PM
1

"A right to life implies a right to the necessary means of life; and that justice, which forbids the taking away the life of an innocent man, forbids no less the taking from him the necessary means of life. He has the same right to defend the one as the other." Pierre joseph proudhon, what is property. Communism, that is the principles and theories expoused by its originators, is a demand for universal right, not a repudiation of them. Let me pose to you a question. Let us sat that an arcitect i…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 10:51 PM
1

http://www.diemer.ca/Docs/Graphics/MarxLenin.gif
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:48 PM
1

http://www.diemer.ca/Docs/Graphics/MarxLenin.gif
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:48 PM
3

Gee thanks. Actually most of us who have read and understand marx's work are fairly intelligent and happily support mensrights. After all, the majority of worker where historically men, and the majority of those working dangerous jobs at below market pay are also men.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:17 AM
2

I love number 2. Because obviously we are responsible to fix the problem feminism created. Was it mens rights activists who told black men "You don't need no girl, you don't need no girl"? NO, it was feminists who told black women, "You don't need no man!" When i hear a generation of black female singers writing about how wonderful having a man is, about how important community and cooperation are, working together with their man because they are stronger with each other then alone, i will be in…
/r/MensRights26/02/17 06:55 AM
1

NO! A few years back one of their writers published an article (Karen did a video) rationalizing mental and emotional violence against men. I have genuinely come to regard any site telling men how they should improve for society as ANti Male Bigotry. Invariably, they end up saying that society exists only fr women, and men are to be sacrificed to their benefit.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 05:00 PM
4

We are about creating a society in which for everything women expect men to do for them, tey are required to do an equal and proportional thing in return. Which is what they had before feminism. Thus, demanding equality becomes reactionary.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:44 PM
10

Because historically the people most subject to wage slavery where female...oh...wait.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:56 PM
12

To whomever posted this, please google "Sentencing gap", ty. One of the major hurdles we have to overcome is the societal idea that violence is male only, that women are incapable of violence and this all violence is a male problem. By demonstrating both that women are capable of violence, that they are just as capable as men, and that society is biased against men in this regard, we argue the case for the necessity of mens rights. How that is confusing i fail to understand.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:05 AM
1

As someone who was in the room when this garbage was dreamed up, it is radical "Kill all men" lesbians. And to answer the question at the bottom of that thread, no, they never follow it themselves, and MASSIVELY rewrote the rules when one of their members got charged for groping a straight women. https://www.thefire.org/antiochs-infamous-sexual-assault-policy/
/r/MensRights15/02/17 10:51 AM
1

no, that is why it is called a wildcat strike. A wild cat strike refers to striking without a formal union, which is illegal under...taft-hartly i think?
/r/MensRights15/02/17 07:54 AM
2

no, that is why it is called a wildcat strike. A wild cat strike refers to striking without a formal union, which is illegal under...taft-hartly i think?
/r/MensRights15/02/17 07:54 AM
5

The term for this is called a "Wildcat strike" and is illegal under US federal law. Lets see if the government enforces the laws when women are flouting them, and how loud the feminists scream if they do?
/r/MensRights14/02/17 06:00 PM
2

Yes, but only if you understand that feminism is a reactionary neo fuedalist movement. Let us suppose you wanted to drag society back 12 full centuries puasing only to replace the catholic church with something not totally discredited. What would you need to do. 1) Convince the majority of people that they are morally incapable of knowing right from wrong and have to be told by "learned scholars". Check. 2) Set up a system where in group A exists to benifit group B and has no right to exist with…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 11:40 PM
14

"Apart from one exception, all the defendants are men." Yeah....this is not discriminatory at alllllll. "First, the person accused of sexual assault is a woman. And, second, she is in court because police want to force her to expose her body against her will for forensic photography – in a way, turning the whole notion of the court on its head." "They win their bid to have a forensic medical officer photograph Arredondo's pelvic area, but they fail in their application to have her breasts photog…
/r/MensRights11/02/17 11:59 AM
1

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No, that sound really stupid and dangerous. No, I hate swimming. Yes I have no clue what those numbers even mean. No And the reason none of that matters is women do not care about how exciting you are, they see you as a walking atm, nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/17 02:12 AM
6

I drive a CDL truck for a living, and there are certain parking lots you simply avoid, or you will get robbed at knife or gun point, and possibly truckjacked. You learn to look for things, like obvious car sized pot holes and the lights not working. If i get my truck jacked, the company is not going to sympathize, they are going to ask "Why where you in that parking lot?" You asked for equality, you get the same standard men are held to. http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/31105/ The problem is no…
/r/MensRights10/02/17 05:29 PM
2

You mention having a boyfriend. Please have him do something. Start an alt account, go to r/feminism, and copy paste what you just wrote here with identifyers reversed. Instead of "the very religious" put "TERFS", instead of "The Feminists" put "PUA's". Se how long until he gets banned. We are not the bottleneck with debate. no one here i am seeing has screamed insults at you, or reported you to have you banned.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 05:00 PM
4

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg You mean the wage gap has closed entirely at the expence of men for no gain by women at all? Shocked, i am Shocked i say!
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:12 PM
8

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg You mean the wage gap has closed entirely at the expence of men for no gain by women at all? Shocked, i am Shocked i say!
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:12 PM
2

"Jackie Kennedy once said there are two kinds of women: those who want power in the world, and those who want power in bed. " If you are obsessed with power, whatever you are doing, it will not result in equality.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:10 PM
2

Fixed http://i.imgur.com/xinr06x.png
/r/MensRights09/02/17 12:55 AM
3

I am considering "Per day" a typo. Who the hell does 6 hours of housework a day? I used to work in a restaurant and could cook food for 500 in a 6 hour shift. DO not get me started on the number of buildings i had to clean in 6 hours as a janitor. I think i spend all of an hour a month cleaning my apartment, and maybe 4 hours a week cooking food (and i mean actual cooking, not microwave garbage).
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:29 AM
51

http://livingwage.mit.edu/metros/16980 THe value of the food you eat, the clothing you wear, and the additional living space your husband would not need if you where not living with him totals $15500 annually. Calculated against a 21 hour work week, this comes to $14.20 an hour. YOU ARE PAID! You are simply narcissistic ingrates. women should only work 34 hours a week to maintain their health and wellbeing compared to 47 hours for their male counterparts. the data also found that women do an ave…
/r/MensRights07/02/17 04:41 PM
18

Because shaming someone into sex when they do not want to risk pregnancy is not a MASSIVE violation of consent....oh wait.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 06:02 PM
17

Strange thing is, i do not recall ever seeing an obese asian women in my life...
/r/MensRights06/02/17 06:01 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg That is not the only thing collapsing.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:19 AM
4

Yes, becouse china's one child policy was not instituted when the central committee determined it could not feed an infinite number of mouths with a finite land area...oh wait, it was.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 05:52 AM
4

The next time you hear someone say "Men can learn something from a false accusation!" ask them what emmett learned...
/r/MensRights28/01/17 07:05 AM
3

The next time you hear someone say "Men can learn something from a false accusation!" ask them what emmett learned...
/r/MensRights28/01/17 07:05 AM
3

“Why don’t men have time to talk about sexual assault?” Because when I talk about the woman who grabbed my ass, or the woman who felt my crotch up, or the women (multiple) who whistled at me, you accuse me of derailing.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 07:14 AM
2

Assuming you are willing to moderate impartially, this would be wonderful. That has been the demise of every sub that has attempted this, people calling any disagreement "Hate speech" and banning half the participants on the ground they disagreed over interpretations of the events. Lemme put this another way. If i where to argue, with supporting facts and evidence, that women always had equality and that feminism is moving towards matriarchy, would this argument be welcome on your forum?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 09:12 AM
2

Ok, lemme say this really clearly; You had equality dear, you threw it away. All obligations come with entitlements, a duty is matched by a duty. If i am required to do something regardless od whether i want to or not, then i am entitled to all the tools, materials and resources necessary to do it. Men having those positions you are speaking of was their entitlement for the sacrifices society expected of them, Just as your getting to feel safe was your entitlement for staying in the kitchen. You…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:25 PM
1

Disappointed that Senator Bob Casey does not seem to know what a "Law" is.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:30 PM
2

I am slightly confused by the context of your question, it seems over broad. "Better" how? More productive? Doubtful, nuclear families represent significant cost savings. Healthier? Possibly, most mental and emotional violence is female on male, and about 65% of women have or has had an std, vs about 25% of men. As a social and political compact? Definitly not, compacts tend to fall appart when a significant number of participants leave. I am not certain either about why sexual expression would …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:52 AM
1

I am interested more in the definitions they are using...I think i might do a video on this later. Ty sir.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 05:18 PM
6

SO, having alienated most of the people they had hoped wuld support them by calling them racists and driving them out of march organizing, they now need to extend a hand towards men s the entire enterprise does not massively fail. Lemme repeat something you have been told before; Identity Politics is Divisive.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:01 AM
5

https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf Please inform you girlfriend that the paragraph is patiently false. Table 4.7 to 4.10 shows that men are more likely to experience violence by a partner then women are. In addition, if you search "Lesbian" in mens rights reddit, you will find a post showing that lesbian relationships are significantly more violent then gay relationships, so no, the men reporting category is not a reflection of violence in the gay community. This k…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 09:55 AM
1

Please read "The conquest of bread" by peter korpotkin, then stop using "communist" as a buzz word for "anything I don't like". I get enough of that from feminists and "patriarchy", ty.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:09 PM
-1

"In the UK, 679,051 sexual assaults and rapes of males took place between 2010 and 2014, but only 26,483 cases were reported to the police." OK, time for back of envelop math here. 680,000 assualts over the course of 20 years (15-35 being sexualy active age for men) is 13.6 million assualts over lifetime. The total male population of england is 31 million (as of 2011, but like most western nations, populations stagnant.) That's 1 in 2. 1 in 2 men in the UK will be sexually assaulted in their lif…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 06:40 PM
1

I believe the correct term is "Poe's Law"
/r/MensRights05/01/17 04:22 AM
3

wait, people did not know about him being a massive perv bordering on closet pedo?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:22 AM
4

Never really liked marvel, was more into Dark Horse because when they where political, they always did it with the same series, so you knew which ones no to buy.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 06:00 PM
1

please tell me this garbage was from some 1950's dating guide for young ladies?
/r/MensRights02/01/17 09:33 AM
2

A variant on my right to mental, emotional, and physical autonomy as it relates to socially imposed obligations in relation to offspring. Specificly it refers to my determination that I am mentally, emotionally and physically capable of caring for another person, and that I and I alone get to make that determination. Physically capable includes financialy capable, as most male jobs require physical work.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 04:21 AM
1

Team mate who had been away for months came back and explained he had a nervios breakdown.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:58 PM
10

"Gender-based violence—of which violence against women is a significant portion" You mean that half the population is experiencing half the violence? Wow, that sounds almost like EQUALITY! Now could you please explain why the other half of the populations is getting none of the attention, resources or help please?
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:22 PM
1

I am actually curios what feminists would say about this. Aanyone here not banned from r/feminism yet?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 06:41 AM
3

UM, do these people not understand that the number of placements in total are limited, so if you take on and then squander it there are not that fewer people with PHD's in the world?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 12:24 AM
5

https://www.buzzfeed.com/regajha/how-privileged-are-you?utm_term=.cxEQEMddK#.xfrA4255k Answer the questions as literally as possible. I (straight white male) got a 14 out of 100. It is very handy to know you privilege score when having these conversations, you are almost certainly not nearly as privileged as you think (or they claim). As to the article, this is the same "Listen and believe" garbage they have been peddling for years. Denying that nearly everything they are complaining about is a …
/r/MensRights27/12/16 08:36 AM
1

non sequiter. Economic crisis implies a slowdown in productivity or economic output. Since the equations used is wages/output, if output drops, the graph should go up, not down. 2/4 = .5 2/3 = .66
/r/MensRights25/12/16 04:19 PM
8

If you use a progressive/scialist construction, it is even worse. Instead of assuming wages are green bits of paper which fall onto your lap and begin by assuming thy are a reflection of the work you did, then men have list nearly half of their wages for no gain by women at all. http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg
/r/MensRights25/12/16 01:49 AM
2

Actually i am pretty certain that is them at SlutWalk, and i am pretty certain it is them supporting SlutWalk. SO this is Radical Feminists shaming MRA's for supporting other radical feminists.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 01:38 AM
2

I have known in my life a couple of men convicted of rape, and they absolutely knew what they did. They would brag to you about it. They would walk right up and say "Yeah, i raped her, it was fun and i'd do it again.", or "Why should one mistake be hedl against me for the rest of my life." Remorse or pride, they all knew they had forced someone to have sex when they did not want to. As to abusers, there is a reason that there is a certain type of smile (liars grin i think it is?) that signals a …
/r/MensRights24/12/16 07:18 PM
15

Ok, lemme posit this question. 90% of women identify as straight. If 90% of women are certifiably of unsound mind, then why are we allowing them to vote? Drops mic
/r/MensRights21/12/16 11:25 AM
7

Becouse mens hard work exists only for women to spend. I remember going through my parents finances and realizing my mother had taked half their pretax income and spent it on herself. While I and my brother sat in school hungry becouse there was not enough money for lunch, 25k a year went to churches and charities. Apparently, men having bodily autonimy is abuse of women.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 07:38 AM
2

I love how "Hetrosexism" is higher on the scale then "Class bias". Speaks volumes right there. And how the external links are entirely editorialized webpages without actual data sources.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 04:07 AM
6

ANd you would starve and freeze because there would be no one to deliver any food or clothing for you you dumb bint.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:37 PM
2

We already have one why would we need a second?
/r/MensRights11/11/16 05:41 PM
2

Social Hierarchic constructs that devalue men who fail or refuse to produce for the social hierarchy.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 09:26 AM
2

Look at UC Berkeley (white men are less than 20% of the student body) where women and people of color formed a barricade near the entrance of a bridge Saurce?
/r/MensRights08/11/16 08:21 AM
5

They already are. As far as i am concerned, this is what gamer gate was about, Feminists understand that they are loosing men to video games and sought to demonize those games to shame men back into compliance.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 04:39 PM
1

YOu are being obtuse sir, The issues faced by men and boys is part of a larger society wide problem that this is also part of. The idea that some people get to have something without having to compromise with others is directly the cause of 3/4 of the problems men are having. I know strippers, they make incredibly good money, and i know single mothers, daycare in most urban areas is subsidized and 24/7, and when it is not their are mothers groups. This person wanted to live the party life, and r…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 04:35 PM
1

ROFL, its not a hit piece, so shut it down...
/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:41 PM
2

Becouse imposing obligations onto people while providing them no way to fulfill them is entirely healthy and completely productive....oh wait, that has started more revolutions then i can count.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 04:08 AM
2

There is this wonderful thing called a Sofa Sleeper. Have one delivered before she gets home.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 08:01 AM
2

It makes sense to manipulate others into giving you love when you’ve never been able to get it any other way. If someone where to attempt the argument that it makes sense to manipulate people into having sex with you if you cannot get it any other way, what would the feminist response be? This entire article is yet another rationalization that behavior that would have any feminist screaming for prison if a male did it should be entirely acceptable when a female does it. The monarchists (those wh…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:42 AM
5

Feminism is “a movement and a way of thinking that focuses on social, political and economic transformation. It seeks to dismantle systemic racism, sexism, xenophobia, transphobia and any other system of power that makes life unlivable and unsafe for those on the margins,” And thus completely ignores the fact that life might be just as unlivable and unsafe for those not on the margins.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 04:39 PM
8

characteristics including race, nationality and eye colour. Not moral character, not intellectual capabilities, not work ethic...Race. Race and Race. If this program only featured Blonde haired blue eyed men, the news media would be shitting bricks.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 03:36 PM
3

Titleledge is based on my reading of Hobbes, Locke, Marx, and several other social compact and socialist theorists. To answer your question, the english, french and american revolutions where justified becouse the governments at the time did not recognize titleledge, that is imposed obligations upon the people without ensuring the people the materials and resources to meet those obligations. Through out the post war era, there where strong titleledges in society. Men where obliged to pursue care…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:39 PM
4

The problem here is the author is conflating Priviledge with something i call Titleledge. Titleledge is that idea that the obligations imposed by society must be matched with corrosponding entitlements. In this sense, "Manxiety" is entirely reasonable, men are worried that they are being asked to do things society is no longer ensuring them the ability to do.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 07:47 AM
3

I hang out (or watch) alot of socialist, communist and anarchist circles, and you are not mistaken. I am seeing people say things like "I am beginning to wonder if identity politics hampers class struggle." I am beginning to see people question if feminists are really trying to help working class people, and i am beginning to see it alot.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:37 PM
1

http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2005-08/artificial-wombs We will soon have the technology to render ourselves forever free. I would like to thank all the women who made this possible, like i told you in college; feminism will do more for men then it will ever do for women.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 06:45 AM
1

Is this even an MRA group? We have been false Flagged before.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 07:02 AM
1

You misunderstand sir. The entire point of women being able to fuck whoever they want is to get pregnant with one mans child then saddle another man with the bill.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 04:18 PM
1

welcome to the club
/r/MensRights28/08/16 01:07 AM
13

A generation of feminists have inundated every male with the idea that flirting with women is sexual assault, and this twat is confused why men no longer flirt with her. Slow Claps
/r/MensRights25/08/16 03:04 PM
1

WTF relation does that have to marxism at all? How is that in any way related to the idea that flooding the market with to many workers debases wages below optimal equilibrium?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:10 PM
5

1 When sexualised analysis of men’s bodies begins to obscure men’s achievements and negatively affect their careers. Read the Illiad. Or any Ancient Greek poetry relating to sports. 2 When the objectification of men’s bodies begins to make their lives unsafe. "Objectification" is not limited to sexuality. Men historicly have been socially obligated to do most of the dangerous or unhygienic work in society, so "treating men as objects" has "Made their lives unsafe" for pretty much all of recorded…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 07:36 AM
1

I came up with a term for this a few years ago "Cake Festival"
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:58 AM
1

The next time a feminist says that 30% of men in a survey said they would violate a womens consent, ask her why she is addressing only 1/3 of the problem.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 09:21 PM
8

http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/96-of-women-are-liars-honest-1-565123 "Forty-two per cent (of women,sic) would lie about contraception in order to get pregnant, no matter the wishes of their partner. And an alarming 31 per cent said they would not tell a future partner if they had a sexual disease: this rises to 65 per cent among single women."
/r/MensRights17/08/16 06:16 PM
1

ANd someone is about to find out exactly what Warren Farrel went through.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 06:35 AM
22

But feminism is about abolishing toxic and unhealthy concepts about men and masculinity...
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:11 PM
1

Yes becouse consent only applies to females, men cannot revoke consent....
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:53 PM
1

Destitution and poverty, and i am a communist. Neoliberalism has failed. It began on the promise of a rising tide lifts all, and now all but flatly concedes it has left the majority under water. A capitalist economy is functionally incapable of producing enough jobs for significantly more then half its population. The influx of women into the labor market with no provision for an equal outflow of men has reeked havoc on wages in the united states. Continued policies of this sort will begger our …
/r/MensRights09/08/16 06:23 AM
1

Can i say it now? The Mizzou protest had nothing to do with race, it was about clearing the Chancellor out of the way to make way for this shit. That is why all the white girls in the background of those protests where grinning like idiots and the first the the new (female) chancellor did was tell Concerned Whatever to take a hike. They had served their purpose and where promptly disposed of.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 05:47 AM
24

ANd the problem here is that they define "Acquaintance" as anyone you have known for more then ten minutes. Define it as known for more then a week and that number changes very fast.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 10:46 AM
1

Re means again, spect means to look. I am looking twice, and you seem to have a major problem with that.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 11:43 PM
1

Sure, right after you replace the crown princes of all those middle eastern kingdoms with women.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 11:30 PM
2

6% of the population decided that they had no stake in our society and reduced inner cities to hell holes. What do you think is going to happen when 30% of our society comes to the same conclusion? "If we do not give boys a stake in our culture, they will come back and burn down our village" was the African proverb?
/r/MensRights30/07/16 10:50 PM
2

Well, we are sick of entitled females hogging subway seats. SO please, stand up ladies and give your seat to a man. Strike a blow against patriarchy!
/r/MensRights29/07/16 07:24 AM
6

SO low status men talking to women must be a hate crime. And you do not see how your movement is being called out of tone deafness to class.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:20 PM
1

What is the name of the writers? Because this is actually something i told radfems when i was in college; If you ever try to kick my balls, i will punch your tits.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:18 PM
2

Yet another onto the pile of "Feminism is neo fuedalism". Ty sir.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:17 PM
1

I repudiate the Leninist heresy. The emancipation of the laboring class can only be achieved by the laboring class itself, without the interference of the government.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:19 PM
1

The GDP per capita of Saudi Arabia is the same as the GDP per capita of the united states. The only reason that their nation is "Poor" is because a tiny handful of people are allowed to control all production under the inane dilution that it is "Gods will". Religion is the opiate of the masses. As to Champagne Socialism, it has always been a problem. I urge you to listen to this, it will clarify so much. https://archive.org/details/conquest_of_bread_0809_librivox
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:01 PM
1

YES! That is my entire purpose on this subreddit to establish that feminism is nothing more then a gang of petty bourgeoisie princesses sobbing hysterically that it is their turn to oppress the laboring class! In the united states the influx of additional workers crippled wages doing horrifying damage to workers control over their productivity. The "Wage Gap" has closed entirely at the expense of men for no gain by women at all In england the issue is even more nuasiating, where every job a wome…
/r/MensRights23/07/16 06:25 PM
3

I am also a hardcore Marxist and this article is gibbering idiocy, which is a reflection of mainstream feminism.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 05:32 PM
2

Congratulation you are where i was 12 months ago. SO who wants to get themselves banned from twitter for starting the hashtag?
/r/MensRights22/07/16 06:06 AM
4

I am going to throw a completely insane idea out there. The first languages where composed of pictures representing ideas. Now, the feminist movement has propounded the notion that people use words to think, but in my case that has never been true. I frequently use shapes or pictures to think. Is it possible that men are falling behind in language because some portion of men (like me) do not use words to think but have to translate visual imagery into words, causing a lag which slows them down?
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:01 PM
2

ANd another one for the feminism is Neo-Fuedalism pile. Becouse those horribly lower caste people walking up and talking to upper caste people is clearly unacceptable.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 05:38 PM
3

Yes, the feminist movement has been overrun by neo-fuedalists who earnestly believe that people who do not benifit them have no right to exist.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 05:34 PM
1

I note that she could not possibly care less about deporting immigrant men. Because feminism care about one gender only.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 05:13 PM
1

http://www.comichron.com/monthlycomicssales.html I am, as always, a firm believer in numbers. May 2016; 3 comics over 100,000, 24 over 50,000 March 2016; 3 comics over 100k, 27 over 50 k May 2007; 15 comics over 100k, 51 over 50k March 2007 9 comics over 100k, 44 over 50 k UM...i think you have a problem there guys.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 10:37 PM
1

And this goes on the "feminism is neo fuedalism" pile as well. Ty.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 10:48 AM
2

...?
/r/MensRights05/07/16 11:11 PM
14

it followed calls from the Rhodes Must Fall movement to decolonize the university's curriculum. Question...how? Did they stop using the English language? Are they going to ignore the last, oh 1600 years of history? How the fork do you decolonize a curriculum in ENGLAND! Teach it in Pict?
/r/MensRights04/07/16 07:09 AM
1

I know the indian women from a video somewhere, WTFsarkur or something.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 02:53 AM
4

The questionnaire, however, was completely arbitrary and by no means set up to gauge true masculinity So how can something which does not exist be toxic? the men who were told they got the lower, masculinity-threatening score bypassed the "feminine" products as compensation, opting instead to choose masculinity-enforcing products Wait, so when you threaten someone to take action to deny you the ability to threaten them....OMFG its the discovery of the century!!!!!!! when masculinity is threatene…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 06:48 AM
6

How many support college quotas for men? Or prison quotas for women?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:29 AM
7

Violating the bodily autonomy of men is a right....WTF.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 05:48 PM
2

The first thing i told several rad fems when i got to college was that if they ever tried to kick me in the balls, i would punch them in the tits. None of them ever tried to test that.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 05:46 PM
1

SO when i tell feminists that having to sell my labor when i do not want to sell my labor is oppression, they have to listen and believe right?
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:08 AM
2

I am sitting in a truck stop and people are staring at be because i am laughing so hard.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:29 AM
1

http://m.imgur.com/ZVeBuON?r This. I am fine with everyone getting 60% of their work in wages. I am not fine with getting 25 - 30%. There is a right direction and a wrong direction, and this is not the equality I am looking for
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:54 PM
23

ISIS. http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/02/15/isis-beheads-21-christians-promises-to-conquer-rome-by-allahs-permission/ http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/14/world/middleeast/isis-enshrines-a-theology-of-rape.html?_r=0 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Year%27s_Eve_sexual_assaults_in_Germany Feminism is not the only threat to the rights of males. Radical religions of all forms have historically tortured and killed dissenters, many or even mostly men.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 06:44 AM
139

Orlando shooting: 50 killed, shooter pledged ISIS allegiance Can you please get a grip on reality now. RIGHT FUCKING NOW! They are raping women all over europe, they have legalized sex slavery in their territory, they publicly execute anyone who disagrees with them, but the problem is toxic masculinity? I remember joking with feminists about how when the towers where attacked the bush administration reached for its campaign manual and said "America needs to go shopping at malls. America needs ta…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 05:39 AM
-2

https://www.verywell.com/degrees-of-burns-1298906 Burns only go up to third degree you whinging muppet.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:26 PM
-1

https://www.verywell.com/degrees-of-burns-1298906 Burns only go up to third degree you whinging muppet.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:24 PM
-2

https://www.verywell.com/degrees-of-burns-1298906 Burns only go up to third degree you whinging muppet.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:24 PM
7

https://www.verywell.com/degrees-of-burns-1298906 Burns only go up to third degree you whinging muppet.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:24 PM
1

I am bored, so lets have fun. 1) ...Are usually trying to just get some pussy. No i am serios, think, why are you asking all of these questions? Becouse you want to find out if he is going to what? Stick his dick in you at the end of the night? That would require two or three questions at most. You are asking questions because you want a long term relationship (possibly involving him provisioning you) and want to know if he is interested in that. He is not asking questions because he is not inte…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:00 PM
1

Interesting, that is actually a strong argument against gender abolition, people are much more willing to hurt someone who does not have a defined social role. If this is true, then it strengthens the argument that socially defined gender roles are not random or arbitrary, but serve a utilitarian purpose.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 07:23 PM
1

I am sorry, but when the CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR is takin the next logical step in your doctrine, you need to seriously look at what you are promoting and ask, "Is this really Progressive?"
/r/MensRights11/06/16 01:58 AM
1

False dicotomy. I am saying gender is relevant only becouse of the normative assumptions feminists are making. That is while 15 to 20 % of women will consider provisioning a male, most women will not, so in order to ensure shelter, food and clothing to all, we must either give the overwhelming majority of jobs to men or find another means of adjudicating wages. I have already thought of several alternitives, btw. That capitalists keep flooding the labor market with too much labor for short term …
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:49 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/v73r4/men_who_have_been_raped_by_women_can_you_tell_us/ They should start here, with these statements. It will be very informative for them.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:44 AM
1

http://m.imgur.com/ZVeBuON?r Becouse obviosly the people getting clobbered should have no say.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:33 AM
1

Google "Lowell mill girls". Women have been part of the labor pool since the industrial revolution began. What they did not get to do was exploit the labor of others. Which is what feminism is demanding and why I oppose them.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 08:21 PM
19

"Men need to give us more weapons so we can hurt them more, how can we stab them if they do not hand us the knives?"
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:26 AM
1

I always found aiming a kick for the knee joint underneath the knee bone followed by an elbow to the solar plexus tended to slow them down alot. Took a little more time, but tended to impede running after me alot more.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:22 AM
1

One that does not have a double didget trade surplus, mind you.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 12:09 AM
1

Are you saying you can show me a capitalist economy with an employment to population ratio higher then 60% for more then 50 years?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:13 PM
1

Have you tried asking? Here is what you do, go to a meeting and state the following;"everyone who believes it is acceptable for women to work jobs without being obligated to feed, cloth and house a non working partener, please raise your hand". Lemme know if it is less then half the room. http://m.imgur.com/NXyCio7?r A capitalist economy is functionally incapable of producing jobs for more then half the people for any length of time. Every women who takes a job is a man who cannot work, if she r…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 10:52 PM
3

The problem here is that the same word is being used to describe two entirely seperate concepts. The first concept is anything I am able to do by myself (in a state of nature) without objective harm to others. This is what is classicly called a right. I am able to speak without objective harm to others, thus I have a right to speak. Certain reactionary's continue to confuse subjective harm with objective harm. The second concept I called titleledge. It is a direct function of the social compact.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 08:44 PM
2

You like a group of people who are deliberately trying to freeze and starve men to death because they do not feel they should have to reciprocate anything regardless of what they demand?
/r/MensRights06/06/16 10:40 PM
57

Feminism is a gang of petty bourgeois princesses sobbing hysterically that it is their turn to oppress the laboring class.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 05:20 AM
5

SO we have another push poll, delightful.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:48 AM
10

First, i am sorry this happened to you. That people are having their lives destroyed in this fusillade is abhorrent. What we have here is a teachable moment, and i beg your patience if i make use of it. In a CDC study conducted in 2010 The number of female on male rapes was nearly as great as the number of male on female rapes In a Bureau of justice report the same year, the overwhelming majority of sexual assualts against boys in juvenile detention where by female staff In a survey in scottland…
/r/MensRights05/06/16 05:24 PM
1

“We found that 54.3 percent of the intercollegiate and recreational athletes and 37.9 percent of non-athletes had engaged in sexually coercive behaviours - almost all of which met the legal definition of rape.” and i stopped reading right there. You included behaviors which did not meet the definition with behaviors which did meet the definition, so that pretty much invalidates any conclusions you reached. The fact that three of the seven questions do not fall into any definition of rape current…
/r/MensRights05/06/16 08:12 AM
1

http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/unemployment-and-employment-population-ratio.gif For those who think socialism is not relevant to mens rights, observe. All social conditions are the product of economic conditions. Faced with the options of provisioning men or going back into the kitchen, women have choosen the kitchen. This was predictable and predicted, a capitalist economy cannot produce enough jobs for everyone who wants one, it never could, wages would rise to q…
/r/MensRights05/06/16 07:54 AM
4

This is the result of 40 years of dehumanizing men, and failing to recognise that a capitalist economy is functionally incapable of creating jobs for more then half the population. The question is not "Where are these men going" but "What is going to happen when men, as a gender, contribute nothing to society?" Are women going to accept that men who are not and will never be useful to them still have a right to exist? Or is this entire push a connivance of the SCUM wing of feminism, relying on h…
/r/MensRights05/06/16 07:46 AM
1

Mens obligation to serve as breadwinners is contingent entirely on unilateral and exclusive control over labor markets. Flood the workforce with double the number of workers and wages fall off a cliff. This shaming is a symptom of a morally and intellectually bankrupt movement.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 01:01 AM
2

claps bravo sir, well done.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 02:11 AM
2

Technically false, i have this argument with a guy i know who is in robotics alot. First, Employment to population is at the highest level in US history. Second, Capital equipment spending is falling. Third, the innovation of the cotton gin increased the demand for southern slaves, not decreased it. Technological innovation merely move labor from one point to another, it does not displace it. This is a narrow problem of over supply, not a broad problem of displacement.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 01:01 AM
1

I am fully aware that correlation does not show cuasation, which is why i included the "75% of women will not date unemployed men" statistic. Just because you do not like the conclusions does not mean i have not shown causation. Also, what explanation? Becouse so far you have cited a tautology and a straw-man.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:53 AM
3

THis is evidence of two things. One, Feminism is Neo FUedalist. The idea that those who believe they control the biological future of other people have any right or authority to kill others if they do not get what they want is a variant on the divine right of kings. Second, we now need to prioritize biological autonomy for males. artificial wombs and the ability to clone males from three skin cells are critical to the equality of men.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 03:20 PM
1

You have not refuted any of my claims. My argument stands.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:48 AM
1

http://imgur.com/a/H5Q5u SO fantastically backwards it is mind blowing. The wage gap has closed entirely at the expense of men for no gain by women at all. This is because when you increase the supply of a commodity its price falls. The reason working people are now struggling is entirely feminism's total lack of understanding of 101 level class issues.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 03:50 AM
1

Apologies for the delayed response, i work 12-14 hours a day. What ad hominems, exactly? Do you even know what that word means? this Yeah, cut the marxist propaganda and use your fucking brain, asshole. Now, if you are willing to listen to logic and reasoned argumentation, i will explain why the problem is entirely class warfare. First, let us begin with 101 level economics. When the supply of a commodity increases its price falls. This is the reason that the "hard work equals success" narrative…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 03:20 AM
10

essentially saying the progressive ideal of equal marriage is bland. You read it right here, women do not want equality, they never did. But the suffering, according to Giacobbo, is now the “man’s job.” So you flatly accede that you have no interest in no one suffering, you expect men to sacrifice for your happiness. While ignoring men's happiness completely. The takeaway from this article is that men, upon entering marriage, should be fully ready for the chance that if they fail to satisfy thei…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 02:28 AM
1

Pennington is of Mexican descent and openly lesbian. Taking bets how long it takes amber and requel to come out as a couple?
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:30 AM
1

Your ad hominems aside, my bad news is that quite a few people here are socialists, and support mens right, the majority of working people historically being men.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:24 AM
1

I have some very bad news for you... http://imgur.com/piqFLQX
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:14 AM
17

Enjoy the luxury of being able to emotionally deal with your sexual assault without repercussions. Enjoy the luxury of being able to say "I want to kill them" and not be called a sexist or a misogynist. Some of us are not so lucky, some of us can only process logically, we are not permitted to punch every female we see in the face on the assumption she is going to grope us.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 03:38 AM
1

I am a commie.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 03:22 AM
6

I am going to puase here and think over how many women i know swoon over johnny depp, the sheer skill he has at one of the most in demand careers in history, and then i am going to say the following; Women are not oppressed, they are narcissistic ingrates. They HAD an equal or equivalent relationship with men, they threw it away because they wanted to have a cake festival. For everything men did for them, they did something for men in return. Now they seem to think men owe them for nothing.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:29 PM
6

livingwage.mit.edu/metros/19100 Ok, i am going to go through this for you. In the video, I noted, among other things, that married men work harder (about 400 more hours), smarter (they’re less likely to quit without having found another job), and more successfully (they make about $16,000 more per year) Now, the minimum amount necessary for a single male is $21,631. For a couple it is $35, 278, or a difference of $13,647. That all well and good, but sooner or later there are going to be children…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 11:40 PM
1

Wonderful, i propose we start with college graduation rates.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 08:06 PM
1

Real men know that men get paid 25% more then women; Real men spend their lives making good by paying us Median income is $28,851 This comes to about $6,000 per year difference. Let us assume that half of that is actually mine, so i owe you $3000 annually. Now average productivity of US workers is $60 per hour, so what i owe to all women in the whole world is 1 hour a week. Oh, and our obligation to provision you is contingent entirely on you never competing with us for labor...ever.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 10:20 PM
1

Is there on updating us on the latest news on Artificial Wombs and the production of a viable egg from two male skin cells? Cause that would be change.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:44 AM
1

That was one of the most incoherent straw-men i have ever read.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 03:09 AM
3

I can fix this in one law. Universal basic income for all non college graduates paid for by all college graduates. When women have to go into debt so men can sit in the basement playing video games, you will see them screaming for men to go to uni's.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 05:41 AM
5

This student assumed that merely being asked to write about the treatment of males involved accepting that there was unequal treatment—an assumption clearly not made in the assignment question. That sentence speaks volumes. The instant, the second, you have to consider mens conditions, the conclusion that we are being treated unequally is unavoidable. Merely bring the subject up makes it inescapable.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 03:59 PM
175

When you are not included in something that no one wants to do — in this case, going off to war — it’s not discrimination; it’s a privilege. SO women not having to work was a privilege. Nice of you to admit. Combat is not an equal opportunity situation for men and women, Neither is working. The Army's own studies have shown that women have more than double the rate of injury of their male counterparts in combat training. Men have over ten times the number of work related injuries women do. By yo…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 03:40 PM
2

Because men do these things. Voluntarily. Every day. They don’t ask for a “thank you” because it is so built-into them to give, to serve. No, it is not built in for us to serve, any more then it is built into you to serve us. The reason is — women don’t have to, so we don’t! Hurray, someone finally gets it, they way to get wage parity is to...ALLOW MEN NOT TO WORK! Women talk about whether or not to “lean in” or “lean out” while men have never had the option to “lean out.” Se above
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:26 PM
1

No just life over the course of 8 or so years. Apparently when you turn down a couple of women flat, all the women who know them decide you are some kind of prize to be won. There is something meta there, but I will leave that for others.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 05:54 AM
1

83 women have at one time or another stood screaming at me becouse I was not trying to date them. I am certain they would be very interested in your theories.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 11:47 PM
3

But no, violent and abusive behavior in men is driven primarily by other men...it obviously has nothing to do with the people they spend most of their time with.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:44 PM
1

Ad just a reminder to people... http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/human-sperm-and-egg-precursors-created-lab We are one step closer to male biological autonomy. Cheer men, cheer, for our future will never be beholden to vagina ever again.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 05:51 AM
10

SO alimony has to continue until the pay gap ends, and now the draft has to continue until the pay gap ends...i think i am detecting a theme here...I wonder who ending the pay gap will benefit http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg
/r/MensRights05/05/16 05:24 AM
19

I am going to go through this and tear appart as much as i can stomach. how boys are taught, sometimes with the best of intentions, to mutate their emotional suffering into anger. Yes, just because someone deliberately hurting you is not cause for being upset. Males exist to be emotionally abused, they need to stop getting angry about it, its just their place. Its not like emotional violence is real or anything, or that the majority of abuse in relationship is female on male mental and emotional…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:51 AM
0

No, they are neo fuedalists. The reason they are whinging for cool points is that they genuinely believe in a variant of divine right by which whoever is most oppressed is most moral and may arbitrarily dictate whatever they want. This has less then no relation to marxism, they are just throwing around words to cover what they want with a thin veneer of intellectualism.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:26 AM
3

This ideology is rooted in and echoes the communist teachings of classical Marxism and Leninism. Stopped reading here. The theory of marxism is that those who control the ability to produce must share that ability with those who do not control it, and that failure and refusal to share is unjust. Who controls the ability to reproduce, and how is supporting them not sharing qualify as marxism?
/r/MensRights02/05/16 02:32 PM
2

And once again, we observe that this has nothing to do with justice and is entirely about coercion. Feminists have no interest in changing the system, they merely wish to change who is benefits from the existing injustices.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 07:19 AM
1

Because of the concept of a UBI. It is the exact amount necessary for one person to subsist, that is if it is deducted in any way that person is now starving. For the government to confiscate part of a UBI would be for the government to declare men should starve to death. This is not something that could be explained away, like the homeless gap currently is. It would be to state explicitly that "yes, there are enough resources for everyone, but we are deliberately hurting men because we want to.…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:39 AM
1

link is broken
/r/MensRights29/04/16 03:21 AM
1

yet more reason UBI is a critical mens rights issue. Because if men are guaranteed an income the government cannot touch, then this whole issue becomes moot. A pity about warren, she seemed reasonable.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 03:13 AM
2

its more that the only way you could reach those percentages is to count womens food, clothing and shelter as "Family" and no count mens.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:54 PM
1

And Neofuedalism rears its head again. The idea that men exist exclusively to benefit women and have no right to live their own lives without being useful to females.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:25 PM
1

Teal Deer builds a case for biologically determined fratricide and completely failed to realize what he is doing. "If women could reproduce on their own, no need for a external input, how many women would seek a stable partner?" Between robots, artificial sperm, and "Rape culture" this is a recipe for the KILLALLMEN brand to run rampant.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:40 AM
7

on of these years we need to get together a comprehensive study involving all cases of sexual assault and rape, victims and perpetrators, by gender. Because between this, that 2008 prison sexual assault study, and the CDC data, it is rapidly looking like any neutral definition of forced sex would result in the majority of rapes being female on male.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:08 AM
5

and that right there is the end of the dear colleague letter.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 12:59 AM
5

not mine, i just found it. I am even more happy for that though, sense and reason are spreading. God speed to them.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 05:54 AM
1

And all i've got time to say before work is in the opening sentence she pretty much calls the existence of a social compact sexist. Comedy Gold.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 03:54 PM
3

http://m.imgur.com/a/H5Q5u Well at least they are being more honest now. Feminism has no interest in improving the lives of women, it is a band of petty bourguios princesses sobbing that it is their turn to oppress the laboring class.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:01 PM
1

The sentance was originally written refering to the conditions of sex workers as deplorablle, but can also be understood to refer to the conditions of coal miders as deplorable.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 10:48 PM
1

And the entire class just failed at marxism 101. Claiming ownership of ideas is the origin of separating the workers from their means of production. No Marxist would recognize cultural appropriation as a thing.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 06:01 AM
13

SO apparently Listening and Believing only applies when she is saying she was raped, but not when she is saying she was not. OK, sure.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 10:17 PM
1

OMFG they finally figured out why the wage gap exists. Yes you stupid idiot, if I am responcible for $20,000 of your choices, then I am owed $20,000 more in wages for the same work. If you want the same wages, stop imposing costs onto me.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 06:54 AM
1

How the hell do you get avfm to send you a confirmation email? I tried to join a few times but I never get the confirmation.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 03:20 AM
2

Question; how?
/r/MensRights11/04/16 08:38 PM
1

We have seen the enemy and he is us.-pogo
/r/MensRights10/04/16 10:08 PM
1

only 1 in 50 what?
/r/MensRights09/04/16 04:55 AM
8

Gentlemen, please pay very close attention here. This is where these rules are going. The feminist definition of "rape" is any male nor fullfilling the unspoken expectations of any female. It is the institutionalization of female on male domestic violence.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:49 PM
5

And cultural appropriation is the best evidence yet that the people are not marxists, have no interest in class warfare, and a gang of Petty Bourgeoisie idiots. Ideas cannot be owned, not by corporations, not by governments and not by cultures. You have not created a new property in hair, the property of hair was always present. That you happened to notice it first is well and good, can i congratulate you for your observational skills. But you may not claim exclusive control over this property o…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 06:13 AM
8

The idea of no cutting infant children's genitalia gives you cancer? Enjoy your lumps sir.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 06:47 AM
2

You forgot /s
/r/MensRights03/04/16 04:00 AM
2

waves Pro Choice, Anti Hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 03:58 AM
5

I am strongly pro choice, it is double standards i am against.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 03:46 AM
2

"Kevin Drum, a slobbering moron with no understanding of economics, demonstrates for one and all his total illiteracy in class conflict!!!" FTFY http://imgur.com/a/H5Q5u
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:38 PM
2

Speaking as an anarchist communist...that was absolute and total bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 04:03 PM
5

And islam states that the word of a women is worth half of a mans...
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:57 PM
3

Because "Separate but equal" worked out so amazingly well in the united states...oh wait.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 05:47 PM
2

Unfortunately our hero misses the point by a mile. http://imgur.com/a/H5Q5u The goal of screaming about the wage gap is political cover for the continued debasement of mens wages as a share of their output. From 1970 to today mens wages have fallen from 60% o their output to 40% of their output for a gain by women of...nothing.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:48 AM
5

Apparetnly MGTOW now has un-named spokemen.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:39 AM
2

Gender Egalitarianism is hatred of women. How can women succeed if the have to follow the same standards as men? LOWER THE STANDARDS, why, then men would be completely useless!
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:36 PM
3

“So, is it really an ‘attack’?” a spokesman for Men Going Their Own Way—a group that preaches the preservation of male sovereignty at all costs, including by staying away from women entirely—asked rhetorically. The spokesman, who didn’t give his name, continued: MGTOW has official unnamed spokesmen... Excuse me my tinfoil hat is a bit dusty. “People who have ugly wives should not comment on other men’s wives,” one user in a private chat room for MRAs said in response to a question from The Daily…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:29 PM
5

OKEY, so the washington post does an article suggesting a strong class divide in marriage rates supported by data and evidence, and this twat goes "Nonono, Its because men fail at everything, because my narratives." Way to fail at arguing.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 10:34 PM
1

Ok, i have that one fixed now, please broadcast ty http://imgur.com/fYw6Ahr
/r/MensRights25/03/16 04:21 AM
4

" I did not give you the drill to make a triangled shaped hole, I gave you the drill becouse you said you where going to demolish and remove the entire wall. If you are not going to remove the wall, then give me the drill back so I can remove the wall."
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:15 PM
1

Livingwage.mit.edu The value of the food she eats, the clothing she wears, and the additional living space her husband would not require if she was not present cost him $15,000 a year. Calculated against a 25 hour work week, this comes to $12 per hour. Having worked in both food services and housekeeping, those are exceedingly good wages.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:09 PM
3

The really fucked up part is that the admins are to stupid to know that anyone logging from an internet cafe or retail wifi connection (coffeeshop, truckstop, walmart) is going to have the same IP. Or so I've been told.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:28 PM
1

If by downhill you mean that people are going to quickly realize that appologising gets them nothing but an endless series of increasingly unreasonable and incoherant demands, then yes, that is exactly what is about to happen.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:44 PM
1

Wait... You mean that 40 years of telling men that women are their equals has resulted in men treating women with exactly the same level if distain women have historicly treated men. THE HORROR!
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:41 PM
3

OK, am i the only person who remembers that not communicating what you want in a relationship is a sign of an abusive partner? If you are saying one thing when you want another, YOU ARE THE ABUSER NOT THE VICTIM!
/r/MensRights18/03/16 02:41 AM
3

Despite positioning itself against the feminisation of public life, and the demonisation of unreconstructed masculinity, SO we are against both the feminine and the masculine. Its almost like we support the abolition of gender roles entirely. Like Feminists where supposed to. Men, on the whole, are more likely to work high-pressure jobs Why? Women have been part of the workforce for 40 years. Why have men not been allowed to quit these jobs and simply watch sitcoms all day....oh, because women d…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 02:35 AM
2

Askreddit thread here
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:28 AM
1

0.o my sincere thanks sir, i must have tried half a dozen times to get google to see that page. I bow to your google fu, it is stronger then mine.
/r/askTRP13/03/16 11:51 PM
1

"Foolish of heart, thou art not a god. There is no life for those who do not adore, and to a man thou hast not. Thou art excommunicated from the union of the faithful." "It is not heresy, and I will not recant!"
/r/MensRights13/03/16 08:16 PM
3

thats the CDC data the OP was talking about. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nisvs/summary_reports.html
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:01 AM
1

ty that was very helpful, i have been relying on the CDC data on online debates, now i have more data. More data is always good.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:59 AM
2

https://librivox.org/the-conquest-of-bread-by-peter-kropotkin/ Done!
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:56 PM
5

This is why we need to make Universal Basic Income a mens rights issue. Threat's of starvation and homelessness are the strongest weapons society has against men, take those away and the whole picture changes radically.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 07:26 PM
6

SO 88% of women feel it is never OK to criticize me in a relationship. I will have to remember that.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 11:51 PM
7

Yet the hurt and frustration these men face when it comes to sexuality is almost always directly tied to the ways in which patriarchal masculinity distorts male sexuality No, the hurt and frustration men feel when it comes to sexuality comes from a catch 22 feminists have deliberately created. On one hand you have a raft of feminists saying that men should not feel entitled to women's bodies, and on the other hand you have the same feminists shaming men for not pursuing their bodies. There was a…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:37 AM
1

I was speaking in metaphor, if you search all three subs they have multiple posts referencing us.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:08 AM
8

And yet people are confused why men are refusing to attend college.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:57 AM
1

Anarchy, meaning a society without coercive authority. The premise of anarchism is it is possible to have a society without a government, based soley upon free and voluntary association. Communism, meaning the implements of production being controlled by the workers. State control was only one if dozens of ideas how to achieve that. Anarchist communism postulates that a society based upon free and voluntary association can only work when the production of the society is shared by all those who h…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:32 AM
1

I am an anarchist communist. I was asking is there another platform that allows sentence structure discussion in real time. And these people are not liberals, they are reactionary neo fuedalists using buzzwords to cover their agenda. The "WE are right because we are morally superior and thus cannot be wrong" allusions are a dead give away.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 08:56 PM
2

IS there currently i viable alternative to twitter or have they managed to copyright any alternative out of existence?
/r/MensRights24/02/16 08:00 PM
0

"Becouse every woke feminist is an exausted mens rights activist who you need to thank."
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:37 AM
17

but will he have a better understanding of himself? Or is understanding women now more important then self awareness in men?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:39 AM
3

I think we need to introduce the feminist challenge. Subscribe to the mens rights reddit and just listen. Do not talk, to not yell, just listen to what we are saying.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 05:55 PM
4

i think they are counting everything. Groceries, yardwork, cleaning, cooking, anything and everything.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:08 AM
6

"The scope of our process was to determine whether or not there was board member misconduct," says Jennifer Waller, the ASCA's executive director. "Although we completely adhere to as much as possible the principles of fundamental fairness, the process that ensues from that is very different from a campus process." So you are tacitly acced that the campus process is not about "Whether or not their was misconduct"? Why thank you.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:11 PM
2

nono, i hope he gets off. Look at their process, it is exactly what we have been demanding. If their leadership walks with the very process they claim is so flawed, what leg do they then have to stand upon?
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:08 PM
3

this
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:01 PM
2

In an interview, McLaren’s lawyer, Pieter Kort, cautioned against rushing to judgment. “One of the unfortunate realities is that many members of the public operate under the presumption of guilt,” he said. The irony, it BURNS!
/r/MensRights20/02/16 04:51 PM
12

There are legitimately COLOSSAL problems with the recording industry being controlling fucktards. I would say the issue here is not so much "Was she raped" but "Why is someone forced to work with someone they have zero respect for? I am in truckdriving, and i know full well, that if i want to ask for another dispatcher, all i have to do is ask. This is an important safety check, as if a given dispatcher suddenly ends up with no drivers, people are going to be asking alot of questions as to why a…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 04:42 PM
1

Yes, I just said that. " Men are able to express their emotions, we choose not to as you (females) have done nothing to deserve them". There is a world of differnce between the feminist "men are incapable of feeling emotions" and the MRA "men feel emotions we choose not to share them with ingrates", and increasing vocabulary will help increase awareness of that distinction.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 08:25 PM
1

Link to study here. http://www.randalolson.com/2015/06/15/144-years-of-marriage-and-divorce-in-1-chart/ It is interesting to note that the last time marraige fell was the great depression. Marraige rates may be reciprocally tied to wealth distribution.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 08:21 PM
2

Several reasons. First, because it refutes the idea that ideas cannot exist independent of words, which is central to alot of things feminism is doing. And second, because the clearer we are able to express mens emotions, the more trouble feminists are going to have with the argument "Men cannot express their emotions". If we are going to get our movement into the public consciousness, we need to show that those who say we are unneeded there are full of shit.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 07:32 AM
20

Wait, there is a circumcision debate independent of MRA's? Where?
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:38 PM
1

YES!
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:19 PM
1

What have i told you people. Affermitive consent is nothing more then abusive, emotionally violent women, trying to trap men in unhealthy relationships by threatening to destroy their lives with state coercion.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 06:04 PM
1

I drive truck. The industry standard is 2 weeks on, 2 days off. When you feel like getting me a normal 5 day work week, please, lemme know.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 05:56 PM
2

That would be lovely if that was how pay walls worked. It is not. The company hosting the storage keeps everything, the professors get jack. Which probobly has more to do with selling out then this does.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 03:38 AM
2

UPVOTE TO THE MOON!
/r/MensRights14/02/16 03:02 AM
2

Can i get source citation on the articles she mentions? Need ammo for arguements
/r/MensRights14/02/16 02:48 AM
30

Call her out as a TERF. They just dictated someone prefereed gender to them.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:05 PM
1

You would need to look at the survey questions. I have seen feminists define shaking their hand as sexual assault.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 11:35 PM
5

So, while I always thought MRAs and PUAs were awful people, I understood their frustration and loneliness, because we shared the same low ERA. And make no mistake, these people are frustrated and lonely Yes, we are clearly only upset because we do not have the nuclear family society tells us we are supposed to desire. Obviously thousands of men killing themselves, being sexually assaulted and raped, falsely accused, forced into abusive relationships, denied access to social services and shelter …
/r/MensRights10/02/16 09:55 PM
2

and women used to wonder why i insisted that they be on top for the first round of any evening. KInd of hard to argue you did not want what was happening to happen if all you had to do was stand up.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:19 AM
1

Hey, they only confused PUA's with MRA's once. IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING MADE!
/r/MensRights08/02/16 10:32 PM
1

I have recently read a number of feminist spaces saying something about how muslim women are leading global feminism. What specifically are they talking about?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:19 AM
3

“‘More boys need to go to college. That’s the long-term solution,’ Birger says. ‘I am certainly not suggesting we do it at the expense of girls. I just think there’s a boy problem we need to address. So after 40 odd years of screaming "ZERO SUM, ZERO SUM!" they magically forget how zero sums work because they want to have their cake and eat it too. Classy, ladies, classy.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 04:01 AM
2

I'm sorry, was anyone confused that feminists believe women are morally superior to men and thus beyond question and debate? also, the blurb at the top is revealing. "Help make him the kind of man she will love me for" Not she will love HIM for, because why would she do that. No, his future wife loving his mother is more important than his future wife giving a fuck in the world about him.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 02:50 AM
1

Oh boy is she not self aware Manipulation usually centers around a direct or indirect threat that is made in order to influence another person’s behavior. Gaslighting uses threats as well, but has the goal of actually changing who someone is, not just their behavior. The entire idea behind Affirmative Consent would fall under gas lighting by this definition. Every gaslighter/gaslightee relationship is different, but for me, there was a very specific pattern. I would say something to him. Not all…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 06:14 AM
1

Where is the original Roosh article, i have a couple of ideas for a meme.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:44 AM
2

LET'S NOT PRETEND FOR A SECOND THAT THERE WOULD BE THIS MANY ISSUES WITH HILLARY IF SHE WAS A GODDAMN MAN. Nono, there would the TEN TIMES THIS MANY ISSUES IF SHE WAS FUCKING MAN!
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:26 AM
9

You are seriously suggesting a man could get two women to murder his wife so they could have a threesome with him? Dude, where the hell are you meeting women like that?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:57 PM
2

Just out of curiosity, is there a web site that charts the comic sales by comic instead of by month?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:56 PM
26

Man demands reciprocal relationship and gets killed by a women who would rather he be dead then treat him as her equal. This is exactly what men rights is about.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:34 PM
18

Um, how does have a right to mutual and reciprocal relationships not about mens rights? He refused to have a non reciprocal relationship and she had him killed. Forcing men into exploitative relationships is the entire point of affirmative consent laws, have you not been paying attention to the James Deen accusations?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:31 PM
4

https://www.reddit.com/r/MRRef Is a good place to start. There are a couple of major studies by the CDC documenting domestic violence, we tend to go with the 12 month numbers because people tend to miss-remember things as time passes. This is the 2010 study http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf And the 2011 study. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm?s_cid=ss6308a1_e#Table6 And here is a very helpful video segment by a fellow named Teal Deer explaining…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:24 AM
2

How is expecting women to do once what men are required to do all the time sexist?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:31 PM
1

If "sexism equals power plus privilege" how is the power to determine the definition of sexism not qualify...?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:22 PM
1

Kool, however that article is still completely incoherent. Where did Kanye insinuate a property claim over Amber Rose?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:40 PM
1

...? in what way does this refer to amber rose? This might refer to Sebastian, but Sebastian is not Amber. Amber is an adult women, Sebastian is a young child.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:27 PM
1

Kanye seems to be under the impression that because he once dated and loved Amber that he can claim ownership over her, a fully grown woman, as if she were an object. when specifically was that said in the exchange?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:26 PM
2

Sighs 1) Sex is not a reflection of character, please stop confusing these. 2) What are rampams? 3) "The notebook"? And as i like Alternative music, i do not like beyonce, she is too mainstream. 4) I do not recall ever having a conversation about boobs ty. And i do not make women sit around talking about men, they seem to do that all on their own. 5) I love cartoons that star a female lead, i do not like when you replace a male lead with a female lead and repeat the exact same story i have alrea…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:09 AM
1

Is u/typhonblue allison? If not can u/girlwriteswhat get this to allison? I request a karen and mike combo attack on this, please.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:15 AM
3

They are cheering at a fictional victory in a fictional universe entirely of their own fabrication. I have friends who are hard core anarchists and communists who are now coming out against this lunacy.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 04:18 AM
1

Why thankyou, this goes into a rapidly increasing "Feminism is neo-Fuedalism" folder in my bookmarks.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:30 AM
1

You are assuming they want your son to get child support. Have you considered that it would probably be simpler to guarantee each child $10,000 living expenses out of the general revenue of the state, and that the only legitimate purpose served by child support system is to make men jump through hoops to avoid prison?
/r/MensRights13/01/16 01:44 AM
5

Or you could simply lie. Imagine their supprise when the entire male population of the campus has not had sex in the last 3 months.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 08:42 PM
2

Its almost. As if they feel entitled to male bodies or something
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:07 PM
5

Why thankyou. I had wondred how long it would take them to throw the LGBT community under the bus.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:27 PM
1

And the first comment I read after the article is blatent and unmittigated class privilege. The people are not leftists, the are possers.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:25 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/NXyCio7.gif We do not have jobs for everyone. We have never had jobs for everyone. So long as we continue to use supply and demand to price wages, we will never have jobs for everyone.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:25 AM
1

http://m.imgur.com/a/H5Q5u Calculated as a share of productivity (IE the progressive standard) the wage gap has closed entirely at the expence of men for no gain by women at all. Also, its not 77%, it was 40% and the question was not "would you rape" it was "would you force a women to do something she did not want to" which includes everything from cleaning her share of the dishes to paying her share of the rent.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 11:05 PM
2

Our thanks sir. here is some information regarding wages that you might find informative. http://imgur.com/a/H5Q5u
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:37 AM
4

Return of Kings has as much to do with the MRA as TERFs have to do with inter-sectional feminists.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 11:56 PM
1

should i even ask where this was gotten?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 02:55 AM
5

I have been working on a similar concept called Titleledge. In short, All obligations come with entitlements. If society is justified in existing at all, it is solely on the grounds that it benefit all participants more then it harms them. Thus, the impositions society makes must be offset by benefits proportional to their inconvenience. If i am required to have a job regardless of whether i want one or not, then i am entitled to a job. If i am required to provision a family i did not desire to …
/r/MensRights03/01/16 04:06 AM
2

Wait, did we just pull off an action and not get lampooned in the press for it... Guys what's going on...this feels weird...someone, I need a hug here.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 08:27 PM
2

Waves
/r/MensRights01/01/16 09:21 PM
1

Again i repeat, Feminism is a gang of petty Bourgeois princesses sobbing hysterically that it is their turn to oppress the laboring classes.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 06:08 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg If you pay shitty wages you get shitty workers. If you want better workers, start paying better wages. Put even more simply, if I am earning half of what my grandfather did, why would I not be half as interested in my job?
/r/MensRights30/12/15 07:34 PM
13

NO, demanding an infinite supply of purchasing power from you partner is domestic violence. If you want to spend money, go make it yourself. Do not demand your partner cover all the expenses of the household then support your lavish lifestyle. His money is HIS MONEY, if you cannot share your money, do not expect him to.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:08 AM
10

I am a fucking MARXIST and i understand that in a capitalist economy, companies are going to pass on the cost of ingredients by inflating the price. Holy fuck are these people stupid.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 07:01 PM
13

The juxtiposition of "Emotional labor" and "Freind Zone" is staggering. When a man does something nice for a women and demands something in return, he is a sexist pig. When a women does something nice for a man and demands something in return, it is feminism. Why is mens emotional labor not being compensated?
/r/MensRights25/12/15 07:00 AM
6

I generally consider them more dangerously confused then anything. They are currently having a debate over the definition of "feminism" that largely seems to revolve around the question "but men can be feminists to right?". We where all there, we all remember the answer to that question. I have personally had an exchange with the head mod where he said flat out he would rather see men get no help at all then admit feminism might be wrong. He, I will concede, is actively dangerous. They will, soo…
/r/MensRights24/12/15 08:33 PM
1

So a ceo decideds to repress her workers, and when class consous netzines call her out, its mysoginy. Cuase obviosly its there turn to oppress the laboring class, right guys?
/r/MensRights24/12/15 03:03 AM
3

http://i.imgur.com/ZVeBuON.jpg Becouse obviosly the empirical harm done to men generally and white males specificly is entirely and totally justified. Again I repeat; feminism is a gang of reactionary neo-fuedalists sobbing hystericly that it is there turn to oppress the laboring class.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 09:20 PM
7

Well, at least they are admitting it exists now.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:31 PM
0

As I've heard it explained: Of course white men aren't going to college. They're too immature and don't have the mental fortitude to handle it. Now that society has evolved past killing and brute force, men will be given the jobs they're best suited for; mining and construction, unskilled labor. Citation Needed
/r/MensRights18/12/15 05:54 AM
2

I don't think this person understands how a "contanment area" works. Trolls are gonna troll. Why? Cuase that's what they do. Would you prefer to have them on some back corner of the internet or in you office every morning?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:30 PM
1

Go for it. Start the hash tag. Just watching the media have to talk about mens issues will be worth she shit storm.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:14 PM
3

Yet another reason a Universal Basic Income is critical to mens rights. Only those who get to go to college should be expected to work.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:08 PM
1

Hrm, I can see your point, but not your method. Why limit ti to recently. In my case, my entire n count occured between 2004 and 2008 (12) after which I got sick and tired of dealith with women who expected to be treated like the empress of russia. If a person has a decent count over a narrow range, why ping them for getting bored?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 05:35 PM
7

SO they are comparing LGBT to animals and dogs...this is getting better by the minute. /S
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:09 PM
2

No mention of LPS, no mention of Alimony or Child Support, No mention of visitation, no mention of FTP, HOW IS THIS INVOLVED IN MRM AT ALL?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:42 PM
32

I am not certain which is more insulting, their opinion of men or their implied comparison of black women to "Animals and dogs."
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:36 PM
5

This will last until the fist female is suspended.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 08:42 PM
1

And again I repeat: Titleledge! All obligations come with entitlments. It is in the interest of breaking this linkage that feminists act, the exploit labor and perpetuate class warfare. By placing a mountain of demands upon men then denying them the resources to fulfil those demands, by expecting them to work for little to no reward, the feminist movement robs, cheats and swindles working people. Mostly male.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:51 PM
1

First of all, they say MRAs oppose marital rape laws, because the contract of marriage should include indefinite consent. What? No! First, we demand female on male rape (involuntary intercourse) and female on male sexual assualt (any violation of consent) be treated the same as the a man does them to a women. Second we demand the unilateral abolition of alimony and paternity proof for all child support, subject to LPS. If your wife is not having sex, divorce her, you owe her not a penny. Second,…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 07:14 PM
3

You are assuming this is not the point why? This is enabling female abusers, nothing less, nothing more.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 05:20 PM
1

So if I have sex with a fubby and all of a sudden she wants a relationship, I get to accuse her of rape? Why, thankyou! That is so increadibly helpful!
/r/MensRights06/12/15 05:18 PM
6

Your problem is that from the elites perspective, putting women in charge is a godsend You can take the hammer to wages and working conditions as much as you like, and if anyone complains fire them for sexism.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 04:29 PM
0

"The Roman law defined property as the right to use and abuse one’s own within the limits of the law — jus utendi et abutendi re suâ, guatenus juris ratio patitur. A justification of the word abuse has been attempted, on the ground that it signifies, not senseless and immoral abuse, but only absolute domain. Vain distinction! invented as an excuse for property, and powerless against the frenzy of possession, which it neither prevents nor represses. The proprietor may, if he chooses, allow his cr…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:05 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/NXyCio7.gif LF means Labor force ROFL, tell her if she wants you to have a decent job, she should give you hers! No seriously, the reason men do not have decent jobs is because women took them all. There are jobs for 56% of adults, there have always been jobs for 56% of adults, and so long as we continue to use supply and demand to set wages, there will always be jobs for 56% of adults. Every women who has a job, is a man who cannot have a job.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 12:51 AM
3

Ironically, a great way to understand a woman’s point of view is to think of her as a marketing consumer: a savvy customer evaluating your products (traits) and ads (proofs) to see if they’ll add value to her life. And i exist to add value to her life why? Maybe i exist merely to exist, regardless of whether i add value to her life or not. Have you considered that option? But they are judging you—and that’s OK Really? Its ok for women to judge men? Did i give them permission to judge me? When di…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:27 AM
6

FINALLY! Someone gets it right! Feminism is not marxism, or socialism, or progressivism, or neo progressivism. It is Neo Fuedalism. They want to appoint females as the new royalty.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:13 AM
-2

Really? You are seriosly telling me that if you walked into a store, selected groceries, walked to the checkout line and where told to put them back becouse "reasons", you would reply "okey" and put them back becouse that is entirely fine and normal? You are a liar or a tool sir.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 06:14 AM
-1

That's what entitlement is. Do I expect to be handed this if I ask for it.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 02:49 AM
1

Oh god that imbicile. I have spent most of my life thinking with pictures and shapes, he is a generalizing dolt.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 04:42 AM
1

"FeMale-only exclusive spaces, such as political groups or women studies courses, often serve as breeding grounds for the transmission of misandric attitudes that contribute to a sexual culture on campus that devalues men." Projection Alert! Projection Alert!
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:22 PM
6

"We want all the goodies but none of the work. OMG WE ARE NOT PETTY BOURGEOIS PRINCESSES, HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT!" Personally, i would argue for a Caveated Referendum. The nation can only go to war by referendum ballot, but everyone who votes yes must sign their ballot and automatically agrees to combat duty by signing.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 05:39 AM
3

The instant we have true equality (IE workers earning proportionally to their productivity) these idiots are going to be out in the cold.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 09:30 PM
2

And the institutionalization of gas lighting continues. THis is not about rape, it is about giving violent and abusive females tools to force men into abusive relationships and then keep them there.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 09:19 PM
2

There is a reason that the Shibboleth of the modern left must be "What is your answer to the question of daily bread?"
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:26 PM
1

Having had multiple second wave feminists question not merely sexual preferance but my physical health for that exact responce...ROFL!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/15 01:00 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg they are doing it backwards again...
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:07 AM
1

What a pitty, that research was staggeringly useful. A handful of preditors would be utterly undetered by consent rules. With this gone, the gaslighting... I mean consne t agenda rolls forward.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:43 AM
3

They are incompatable only in the eyes of those wedded to the idea that capitalism is freedom. No one I have met in the mra will dispute that the overwhelming majority of workplace injuries and deaths are men. It is only the arguement that threats of starvation and homelessness are coercion that is lacking herein. Once these are brought forward, the conclutions are self evident.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 05:32 PM
4

Nope, not even close. I actually did a poll on this when i first showed up. http://imgur.com/piqFLQX Personally i am hard core anti cap, the last straw for me was ellin Pao declaring her workers not only could not collectively bargain, they could not bargain at all. I signed on for equality, not an oligarchical matriarchy.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 05:06 AM
2

I know that, I want the added effect of screaming allison.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 03:48 AM
1

Holy shit. How many times, how many posts, did i spend arguing when that California thing came out that retroactive consent withdrawal was baked into the cake? ANy redpills reading this, WAKE UP. "Affirmative Consent" would be better termed "Revenge of the Plates".
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:11 AM
1

Rofl.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 08:05 AM
3

ROFL. As an anarchist communist, you have my personal assurance that if only educated people where allowed to speak, the ideology you profess would never have seen the light of day. Every economist at the time except marx unilaterally denounced his work, and it was only by its promition in the workers press that it reached the public at all. This is a petty Bourgeoisie nitwit, advocating the same reactionary drivel that such always propound. That she has the nerve to use the term "Marxist" to de…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 03:02 AM
1

Ad hominem. Dyslexic on a phone.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 03:02 AM
3

I am an anarchist communist, and I understand economics very clearly. I simply disagree with mainstream thinking. If you have any passing familarity with the subject, you would know that econimists refuse to empiricly test even the simplest of their ideas, and thus the entire field is nothing but a mass of speculative suppositions. Also, it would not be the first time I have been cross posted there. If that is the best you can do, I have little reason to worry.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 11:45 PM
7

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg Ok, first things first. Feminism is not interested in "liberating" anyone. It is a gang of petty bourguios princesses sobbing hytericly becouse it is their turn to opress the laboring class. They have not advanced women anywhere (economicly) all they have done is hamstrung men. Which I suppose is the answer to your question. If the workers where "strong, bold, and willing to do what they want" they would quickly realize that their managers are barely compitent imbi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 02:59 AM
3

I remeber reading somewhere around here that 95% of women would not date a man who earned less then they did, and I know a forbes poll showed 84% of women aspired to housewife. I will take this seriosly right after they pass a universal basic income so people only have to work if it is in their narrow self interests. EDit; does anyone remember an article about how male violence is cuased by shaming related to failure to perform social masculinity? I remember it, and commenting on it, but I canno…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 12:27 AM
0

I think that attacking men is so normalized in society that people attack men without even realizing they are doing it because they are men. Like how people say "Men can't be raped" without pausing to think that he might not want sex. They are assuming he wants sex merely because he is male, that he has consented merely because he is male, so they have sex without his consent because he is male, so they rape him because he is male. Its the same with violence. "Men can take it, they are bigger an…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 05:09 AM
1

Given that men are viewed as disposable, i would argue all of them.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 08:52 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Pqv3q58Nx0 will you idiots shut up.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:23 PM
3

Wonderful, i would like to suggest a few topic women can shut the hell up about. Alimony, Child support, The Internet, Safe Spaces, Feelings, Privilege, Rape Culture, Wage gaps, and Speech.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:57 AM
4

And you get one of my very rare upvotes. Please enjoy economic data. http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:24 AM
0

http://wjmc.blogspot.com/2010/09/us-employment-to-population-ratio_04.html?m=1 Do you not understand how to read a graph? First, women prior to the 1960 barely showed 30% participation. The overwhelming majority of women where housewives. Second, the collapse of wages correlates with the increase in labor force. It was not "men and women swapped" anything. It was women wanted to work at a job, but refused to let men stop working. They tried to have their cake and eat it to, and it blew up in the…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 03:20 AM
2

http://i.imgur.com/SY1FWbj.jpg And whose fualt is it that mens wages have cratered? Seriosly, if you hammer mens wages into the ground for five decades then sit crying into your martini's that there are no highly paid men to marry, your either a hypocrit or a dumbfuck. Also, what happened to all those women who wanted house husbands... Where did they disappear off to...
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:05 PM
2

http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/09/12/is-opting-out-the-new-american-dream-for-working-women/
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:26 PM
0

http://i.imgur.com/NXyCio7.gif Ok, we get to do economics again. When the supply of a comodity increases, its price falls. If the supply of workers increases, wages fall. Given the forbes survey showing 85% of women want to be housewives, this means that the reason women cannot find a husband rich enough to support a stay at wives is that women joined the labor pool. I am sick to death of listening to feminists lie to women about what happened and why it happened.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:45 PM
1

If anything the left is madder then the right. Chris hedges is screaming his head off that this thing is a disaster for workers and the environment. Obama on the other hand already said he would sign it. This is one of the few times I as a hard core liberal look favorably on the house being a disfunctional circus act.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:52 PM
0

Nothing, hence my referance to gaslighting. This is an imposssible standard ment to make the male victim emotionally dependant on the expiereance of the female abuser or face ostracisation and public shame. It is an explicite statement that men exist only to validate womens perceptions, and have no need to exist independant of that validation. Its not about sex or consent. Its about violence and control.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:30 PM
2

Holy Fucking Crap! I do not even know where to begin with this shit. Blind, unadulterated hubris? Narcissism? Unrepentant and Unfettered class Privilege? Have you showered in the past day No, i have not showered fro three days, i drive a truck for a living and truck stops charge $12-$15 for a shower, so i cannot afford to shower every day. Have you stretched your legs/moved to music. Again, Truck Driver. I get to sit in a chair for 12 hours a day, then go to sleep. I do take a short walk while s…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:10 AM
2

From the article "Meanwhile of the women who identified as straight, 74% were strongly sexually aroused by videos of both attractive men and attractive women. " "Dr Rieger said: "Even though the majority of women identify as straight, our research clearly demonstrates that when it comes to what turns them on, they are either bisexual or gay, but never straight." " Apparently Dr. Reigar does not understand remedial math.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:36 AM
6

So clearly this author supports the abolition of alimony and child support...right?...right?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:32 PM
1

Thank you SO MUCH< this is exactly what i needed. I love you guys. I have been arguing with some feminists for weeks that women hate men who express their emotions and it is women, not patriarchy, that is responsible for this. And now i cannot find the post showing that violence is directly caused by social shaming.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 06:30 PM
1

Sideways. Feminisms target is not "masculinity" per say, ask about abolishing alimony or child support and you will see them come screaming to the defence of male providor role. What feminism attacks is male autonimy, physical, mental, and emotional. This is why they demand men express emotions while denying emotional violence against men. This is why they talk about bodily autonimy for women but refuse to discuss autonimy for men. This is why they talk about a "zero sum" so much, to them, it is…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 12:27 AM
8

was it deleted or just rolled off?
/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:01 AM
3

the problem with this is it completely ignores social gender norms that function on the expectation of owing people nonsexual things. For example, i have been dog-piled for refusing to buy women drinks at bars, castigate for not going out to dance with someone who knew i hate dancing, and had multiple dozen women screaming at me over the years for not making the first move. If it began with "i don't owe you a drink, i am not helping you study, and i need sleep thankyou" i would be interested, bu…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:27 AM
5

Congratulations OP, you have successfully missed the point by miles. http://i.imgur.com/65EIvMW.gif http://i.imgur.com/NXyCio7.gif When the supply of a commodity increases, its price falls. Labor is a commodity. By increasing the number of people seeking jobs, Feminism drove down wages. Declining wages means lower consumer demand, because idiocy about infinite greed aside, one billionaire is not going to buy the same number of cars as 20,000 middle class families. Lower consumer demand means a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/15 04:08 AM
15

“We should call on both genders to cut the word too from their vocabulary when discussing women . . . Because obviously men are held to no social standards at all...
/r/MensRights28/10/15 05:44 AM
1

You remember that "Zero Sum" all those feminists kept talking about. HEY there we go.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 07:01 PM
1

OK, and the question that leaps immediately into my mind is "If you don't want to fuck, why are you dating?" No seriously, what the hell is the point. Mens wages have fallen s low they will never be able to support you. You have no interest in anything they want to do so reciprocal emotional support is out of the picture. YOu want to abuse them? Is that it? No wonder they are running away from you.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 07:00 PM
1

Posters pointing out that she is an MRA are being down-voted, either because feminists want people to believe that "this is what a feminist looks like" or because the term MRA has been so maligned in the media. ROFL!
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:14 PM
1

Well that was incoherant drivel.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:01 PM
2

“You’re not taking due process away from someone by giving someone else equitable rights,” he said. “It’s not a taking; it’s a leveling.” Leveling implies some point of comparison, some other thing that is not level. What precisely are you leveling with here?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 01:59 AM
0

Define "economic freedom". If you mean any of the following 1) Control over means of production 2) Ability to profit from ones own labor 3) Ability to participate in the market voluntarily Then no, women have gained nothing, they have simply destroyed the economic freedom of men. They do not control their production, median income barely cover cost of living so they are not profiting, and as all workers sell labor under threat of starvation, they are not able to stop selling. Polygamy requires l…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 09:38 PM
1

I am going to try to explain to you the massive levels of fucked up your post is. First, you seem to think that people can transform themsleves into so socialy conformist drone while still "being themselves". They can't. People do not change who they are, they pretend to be fake people they are not. Your personality is the product of your life and expiereances. Unless you eface 20 to 40 years of life from a persons memories, they have not changed, they are simply being a fake person. Second, as …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 06:52 PM
-11

It has been a while since I related this. I did not loose my virginity until after highschool, by which point I had taught myself through masterbation to orgasm half a dozen times in a couple of hours. Imagine my suprise when women after women showed no interest in continuing after the first or second orgasm! A short series of conversations revealed this to be the norm, it was simply that all the "chads" had never bothered to test their limits through masturbation the same way I had. Looked at t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:37 PM
2

File a title IX claim demanding all people for all degrees receive this. The school deserves to go under.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:41 PM
3

I propose we reclaim toxic masculinity defined as any definition of masculinity that is harmful or hostile to men.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:39 AM
5

You get erections and you have no clue what morning wood is?
/r/MensRights17/10/15 03:56 AM
2

and clowns make laws for queens?" How long will it be before this movement is recognised as the reactionary neo-fuedalists they are?
/r/MensRights16/10/15 05:09 PM
16

I prefer to put the onus on them, "I'm sorry, you are arguing that if a women gets wet, it is not rape?"
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:59 PM
5

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/21/three-out-of-four-women-would-not-marry-someone-unemployed_n_881318.html http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21620230-women-still-most-want-marry-men-money-got-have-job http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1345520/What-women-REALLY-want-To-marry-rich-man-stay-home-children.html http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/09/12/is-opting-out-the-new-american-dream-for-working-women/ So, anyone bothered asking Australian women if they want …
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:13 AM
2

Iron womb. Sry.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 10:47 PM
1

Assuming you are ok with both hentai porn being normalised as well as the development of iron whoms so men can be produced from skin cells, done.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 06:16 PM
1

Se this is where we disagree I believe. To me if the existance of a market is justified, then it must be free. Not in a narrow sence, in the broadest sence. People must be able to show up or not, participate or ignore it completely, entirely at their discression. The issue to me is not that the market place is imbalanced, it is that people are social shamed for refusing to participate. There is a rather long example from a video game called RO. There was a king of the hill event called WOE (war …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 06:13 PM
1

The "reward" is a social expectation in itself, Since when has other people telling me what they think I am supposed to be doing been a reward? That's not a reward, that's a nuesance. Titleledge! All obligations come with entitlements. If society thinks I am supposed to go and do something, society is required to compensate me proportional to the headache and inconvienance of doing that. Mens obligation to act as providor was compensated by near exclusive contol of labor markets. Womens obligati…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 01:46 AM
2

Your statement was that men should be praised for not having sex while women should be praised for having sex. Now, let us assume 100% of people follow this, which should ostencibly be the goal of any social reform. If 100% of men do not have any sex, who are the women going to have sex with? So we then consider less then 100% of men having sex. Now, men who are not having sex will be less expiereanced and less desireable then the men having sex, so this would function as a "reward" for men igno…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 12:43 AM
5

How so? Anarchism and socialism are based upon bodily autonimy. They simply recognise that my calories are part of my body, and the work those calories produce are an extension of my body. How can bodily autonimy be extended to one gender and not the other?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 12:12 AM
4

3) Women are praised for being sluts, and men are praised for being virgins. This one has me confused. Women being virgin praised is merely the inverse of male providor expectation. Men are obligated to feed, cloth and house children on the assumption those children are theirs. This is a mutual and reciprocal arranegment. What possible benifit do men gain by feeding, clothing and housing children that are as likely as not someone elses? Why would anyone ever accept that? Second, how are women go…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 12:06 AM
8

I am going to repeat back to you what I just read, and you tell me what is wrong with it, ok? There was a time that when a woman got pregnant, it was considered unladylike to not step up and give birth to your child. Women were grown-up enough to take responsibility for what they did, not try to weasel out of it by saying it's somehow anti-woman to actually give birth to your child, and expect society to accept dwindling populations. Real women would be horrified at the thought of leaving her re…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 06:44 PM
5

I presume given the CDC data showing that women commit nearly as many sexual assualts as men, they will also be asking women for their "Women Card"?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:21 AM
1

interesting, and thankyou.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:18 AM
1

Cultural marxism critequed by an anarchist communist. First, the term is poorly chosen, a Pole has pointed out. The very first decision, reached by the very first group of communists, at their very first meeting was;"The emancipation of the laboring class can only be achieved by the laboring class itself, without the aid of the government.". It was understood in all marxist circles that meaningful change had to be organic, fostered with broad and vibrant support, not imposed onto unwilling commu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 03:33 PM
7

You could start an industrial revolution with that much irony.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 01:39 AM
2

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm One of the best links on there. Compare the male "forced to penetrate" vs female "forced penetration" numbers over 12 months and ask why insertion is worse then envelopment given prevailing gender roles.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 12:28 AM
1

Becouse you are unwilling to accept that economics departments are tacitly the same and womens studies departments. waves goodbye
/r/MensRights06/10/15 07:32 PM
1

You literally read nothing i just said. There are no "Expert Sources" in economics. They have all the authority of Scientologists. Listen, the field of economics exists to validate the preconceived notions of the wealthy, nothing more. If you actually look at basic 101 level assumptions and empirically test them, they are horrifyingly wrong. But if you where to wait for all the economists in the world to test all the assumptions they are making, you would wait for eternity, because they have no …
/r/MensRights06/10/15 04:08 PM
1

How many of your statistics were made by you? All of them. Why in heavens name would i trust anyone else's statistics? And FYI there are no "Credible Sources" in economics. Nothing has ever been proven. Economist's cannot conduct any experiments. If you wish to ask me what my formulas are and double check the figures yourself, please, feel free.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 04:24 AM
1

Of the 899 rapes reported, 340 of them where by someone the victim had know for less then 24 hours. That's 37.8%
/r/MensRights05/10/15 09:41 PM
1

I have already done wage share (ROFL i came up with it on my own in 2007, but ok) here and here. This is a variant on the same concept. Instead of comparing wages as aggregate to GDP, i am comparing Hourly GDP to Hourly median wages, so i can show how wages for different groups have changed. When you look at this table, you'll see that the inflation adjusted income for male workers is the most irrelevant metric under the sky. Inflation is calculated as a basket of good, and has little to no refl…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 09:20 PM
4

For example, a Muslim man could divorce his Muslim wife by saying "divorce" three times as per sharia's requirement and leave her high-and-dry with minimal financial support (this actually happens in India and elsewhere). Obviously, that would hardly be an advance for marriage equality. Begging the question. If women have no obligation to financially support men, why should men have an obligation to financially support women. This makes sense only in the context that men and men alone have acces…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:39 PM
2

One cause might be the increased income going to the top 1% of US citizens. The increased income is going to the top 1%. That is not the cause. The cause is the oversupply of labor debasing wages. Wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that women advancing in the economy from a lower starting position would counter the effects of a universal loss in wages as a percent of gdp? I am not certain what this sentence is supposed to mean. Wages are not derived from capital, there is not a fixed pool of wa…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:59 AM
26

Not so much "Substitute" as "Obfuscate". Anyone with even a passing understanding of class struggle understands that the correct measure of remunerations is as a portion of the production achieved. However, if you actually calculate this way, the results are a screaming indictment of feminism. The feminist movement has decimated working class male wages for no gain by women whatsoever at all, and then buried any attempt at bringing attention to this by screaming "Rape Culture" over and over agai…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 08:05 PM
2

Here is an idea, lets tie wages directly to productivity and see what happens.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:57 PM
9

Consider for a moment how angry feminists would get if the MRA demanded that every panel everywhere in the world include at least one man who must be allowed to speak as much as the women do.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 05:02 AM
2

I have had a ban level increase for posting a graph there and stating what the graph said. They are very, very restrictive.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:58 PM
1

Normal mammalian pregnancy is a well-ordered affair because the mother is a despot. Her offspring live or die at her will; she controls their nutrient supply, and she can expel or reabsorb them any time. Human pregnancy, on the other hand, is run by committee – and not just any committee, but one whose members often have very different, competing interests and share only partial information.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:36 PM
6

oh oh they are going to decry members of their movement who advocate putting men into camps? Or admit women are just as capable and culpable in rape and violence as men? Or ... Oh, nm they are going to double down on male shaming rhetoric.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 02:41 PM
5

~The sound of snakes devouring their own tails~
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:43 PM
1

Did sargons takedown of the debates ever get put back up?
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:22 AM
3

There was an article a few years ago asking why feminism was "Tone Deaf To Class". This is why. Denied the ability to threaten the economic sustenance of working people, they have no leverage, no ability to silence their critics or threaten anyone. This is why i say again and again, these are not progressives, not socialists, not anarchist, and certainly not communists. Their death knell is the words of Kropotkin; "What we do want is so to arrange things that every human being born into the worl…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:12 AM
1

that would be $1k/m.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:59 AM
2

+$1g/m ? what does this even mean?
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:38 AM
1

The very first decision, by the very first group of communists at their very first meeting was "The emancipation of the laboring class can only be achieved by the laboring class itself, without the aid of the government." If you where as oppressed as you think you are, anyone helping you would not even be considered as an option.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:52 AM
1

Assuming their sample population to be accurate, this would mean that 1 in 7 men are victims of female violence.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 04:28 PM
1

what time was this done at, on what day. I ma interested in listening to what they are trying here.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:23 AM
7

The Roman law defined property as the right to use and abuse one’s own within the limits of the law — jus utendi et abutendi re suâ, guatenus juris ratio patitur. A justification of the word abuse has been attempted, on the ground that it signifies, not senseless and immoral abuse, but only absolute domain. Vain distinction! invented as an excuse for property, and powerless against the frenzy of possession, which it neither prevents nor represses. The proprietor may, if he chooses, allow his cro…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:27 PM
2

TY! I knew someone had to have realized that point before me.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 10:29 PM
1

They actually deserve to be in jail, but the other three panelists testifying at the hearing, along with nearly every congressman who asked questions, didn't seem to believe jail was necessary. And this right here is all you need to know. This is not about rape, this is about driving men out of higher education.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:41 AM
7

Personal research based upon Census data and Bureau of Economic Analysis data. I divided the GDP by national Employment, then compared that number to median income.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 04:42 AM
2

Oh, and if Ms. Penny happens by, what we have lost is approximately $40,000 in wages each. http://i.imgur.com/rszvZHe.gif
/r/MensRights10/09/15 04:17 AM
5

They are not in the most powerful position they could be in. They are in the most powerful position they could be in under a constitutional democracy. They could revive feudalism under matriarchal rule. The ability for a single female ruler to pass laws at whim would be significantly more power then they have now...
/r/MensRights06/09/15 04:43 PM
-5

I just threw up a little. This man has no clue what he is talking about. The goal of communism is and always was to place industry in the hands of the workers. Destroying industry is antithetical to that goal. The goal was to educate all workers, destroying education is antithetical to that goal. To grant all workers a decent standard of living Via division of labor, at work and at home. Destroying the family is antithetical to that goal. When people understand that feminism is a reaction agains…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:43 AM
8

Also, if anyone says "We mean black out drunk, not just intoxicated" please feel free to cite the video being critiqued. The SJW are now literally arguing that anyone with a .08 cannot consent and thus all intoxicated sex is rape.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:22 AM
1

Sry, fixed :)
/r/MensRights30/08/15 06:12 AM
-4

slow claps congradulations, you have discovered class warfare ladies. Nice job. Now, what is your answer to the question of daily bread.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:32 PM
2

I didn't pick it, its what men who advocate working class issues in anarchist spaces get called. I am simply re-appropriating the term.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:32 AM
3

I accuse ohio student Rachel Baker of sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:14 AM
2

WEEEE lacy. The problem with this entire debate is that feminists consistently ignore the Negative Externalities of non monogamy. There is a reason sexual fidelity is linked to financial obligations towards offspring. Men are not going to voluntarily accept having to spend 20 years paying for some other guys baby. Now, if feminists wish to grant full and unlimited Legal Paternal Surrender to men, or mandate paternity tests on all newborns, Kool, monogamy gone. But I do not see them doing that.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:35 PM
44

Mind if i make a video out of these?
/r/MensRights27/08/15 09:32 PM
2

In fact, there were more men murdered at work in 2013 (341) than there were women who died at work of any cause at all (321). "Facts are stupid things." R Reagan. Congradulations WaPo, you are not emulating a senile tradcon. slow claps
/r/MensRights27/08/15 09:31 PM
2

Hey, I think it might have been on of karen's videos. Hey, u/girlwriteswhat, did you do a video involving research that women enforce masculinity?
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:57 PM
1

Have you copped much criticism from feminists for writing about male disenfranchisement? No, actually. I've caught a lot of criticism from men, some men. It's funny, the criticism I get every day on Twitter is "Why don't you care about men? Why don't you care about male rape or suicide rates?" And I say, "Well, have you read my book? I really care about that. I think that's a feminist issue and I write about it all the time." And I say, "do you want to talk about it?" And they just disappear. Wo…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:16 PM
6

I..Wut...ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? Well, we have at least now confirmed that feminism is not communism. Communism involves plans. Feminism is incoherent.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:31 PM
20

No, the core of the attack on men is what are called Negative Externialities. Trunkating wiki A negative externality occurs when an individual or firm making a decision does not have to pay the full cost of the decision. When a negative externality exists in an unregulated market, producers don't take responsibility for external costs that exist--these are passed on to society. A common example of a negative externality is pollution. For example, a steel producing firm might pump pollutants into…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:22 PM
1

ITS GETTING OUT THERE HURREY! Ok, the y axes is percentage. Now, for contect allow me to quote henery george Progress and Poverty Take the next step where wages are estimated in kind, but paid in an equivalent value of something else. For instance, the custom on American whaling ships is to pay each crew member a proportion of the catch. At the end of a successful cruise, a ship carries the wages of her crew in her hold, along with the owner's profits and reimbursement for stores used during the…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:07 PM
2

hence why i am asking if we have any support via research.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:25 PM
2

Where was that study saying the primary enforcers of male gender norms are females? Cause combined with this...
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:12 PM
-2

What strawman. Women are working you ignoramus. If you are referring to child support and alimony, then your argument makes no sense, as non-paternal support orders, while they occur, are still rare. Which means all we have to do is institute MANDATORY paternity tests for all children and all of a sudden the guy with a half dozen women is not so attractive an option any more. If you are refering to welfare, GOOD, i have no problem paying someone $2,000 to sit on their ass if my paycheck goes up …
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:49 AM
-2

If they are working they are producing their own resources...holy fuck you don't even know that? For instance, the custom on American whaling ships is to pay each crew member a proportion of the catch. At the end of a successful cruise, a ship carries the wages of her crew in her hold, along with the owner's profits and reimbursement for stores used during the voyage. The oil and bone the crew have caught are their wages. Can anything be clearer than that these have not been drawn from capital? …
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:06 AM
9

Linguistic double standards have long bounced between the sexes, and while self-assured men are praised for being assertive, undaunted women are often damned as being bossy, or controlling. Self assured men do not need women, and thus do not see any reason to tell women what to do. The fact that we are discussing women telling men what to do invalidates the entire above claim.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:46 AM
-3

For the same reasons it's gone hog-wild today: when women don't have to work http://www.vanneman.umd.edu/socy441/trends/lfpsex25.gif At this juncture i usually headbut my opponent, as they deserve to have their head hurt as much as they are making my head hurt. Women have been attracted to whomever had the most resources. Historically, this meant whoever was the most violent or deceptive, that is whoever could coerce or trick others into giving them resources for free. However, in the 1950's thi…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:07 AM
0

http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats13/figures/54.htm SO we have a 40/70 split in afro americans and a 15/20 split on euro americans. I am not seeing the 20/80 you where talking about. Yes, women possibly cheat more, but we know that. what this shows is that women cheat a whole lot less then roosh has been claiming. More interesting would be the breakdown by income. If women at lower incomes cheat more, then socialism just became MRA's best friend. Guarantee everyone a six figure income and watch "Femal…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:20 PM
6

If you look at genital herpes, you'll find that a majority of women have it while a minority of men do. WTF are you smoking?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:18 PM
4

My own personal research sadly enough. Its easy enough to replicate, but as i drive a truck for a living, god help me getting it published. Effectively, i reworked this graph here into a visual people could easily understand. The formula i use makes an average productivity per worker (GDP/national employment) then ratios the median income to that. SO if there are 100 workers (50 male 50 female) producing $100,000 in total. The men are paid $300, and the women are paid $250. $100,000 / 100 worker…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:58 PM
1

WAGES. Dear god what has happened to mens wages is criminal. http://i.imgur.com/rszvZHe.gif
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:51 PM
10

They would rather hand the award to no one at all then recognize decent writing that happened to be done by men. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:38 PM
1

no, the libertarian position is that the welfare state hurts workers. But if all the workers are female, and all the non workers are male, why do i, as a male, care?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:53 PM
6

Men will sleep easier when there is a universal basic income guaranteeing we will not starve if we do not have a job. And to preempt the libertarians, what the hell do i care about tax payers if they all have vaginas?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:44 AM
-1

First-Degree Sexual Assault ; Sexual contact or intercourse (vaginal, oral, or anal sex and the intrusion of any part of a person's body into the genital or anal openings) with a person without his or her consent (words or actions by a competent person indicating freely agreeing to sexual activity) Does not say ongoing, and recognizes actions as consent.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:33 PM
1

Um, no, http://i.imgur.com/rszvZHe.gif The purpose of all that reworking was to hammer mens wages into the floorboards while doing nothing to help women at all. It was a massive corporate con job the whole way.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:56 PM
-17

No, it is not. It is a campus policy. The police cannot jail you for not getting ongoing consent.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:48 PM
2

Watching society not even remotely cope with the impact of 3rd wave feminism is hilarious. Oh, lets see here, you abolish all gender roles and replace them with nothing, tell men they will benefit nothing from society thus ensuring they have no obligation to care what society thinks of them, and attack stable relationships as degrading to women, and you are shocked, SHOCKED when a toxic dating culture develops. Que Suprise.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:38 AM
1

the pronoun "Man" was preceded by the adjective "Real".
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:50 AM
1

Never trust anyone who puts adjectives in front of pronouns. - pual elam
/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:45 AM
12

http://i.imgur.com/65EIvMW.gif http://i.imgur.com/NXyCio7.gif http://i.imgur.com/rszvZHe.gif Why is it people magicly forget how supply and demand function when wages are discussed? When the supply of a comodity increeases, its price falls. Or in plainer terms, the reason men cannot pay for dates is becouse you are competing with them for jobs.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:19 PM
2

There is a link to a link I am interested ig anyone has debunked. http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/vio.2014.0022 It says that 1 on 3 men would "force a women to have sex" if they thought they could get away with it. Its behind a pay wall, but I remeber reading a takedown of it before. Any clues where?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 03:42 PM
2

And this is why socialism can never be feminist.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 03:14 PM
1

you'd need to add both numbers together to get to 100%, both male and female. What? nono, oh good heavens no, how are you constructing things that way? Hrmm, where to begin, where to begin...ok, henry george; on American whaling ships the custom is not to pay fixed wages, but a "lay," or proportion of the catch, which varies from a sixteenth to a twelfth to the captain down to a three-hundredth to the cabin-boy. Thus, when a whaleship comes into New Bedford or San Francisco after a successful cr…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 11:03 PM
1

% = Median income / (GDP / National Employment) and it is my own creation. I have taken to doing alot of economic research myself because the whole "Freshwater / Saltwater" divide has rendered economics so partisan. The graph is entirely separate from "Profit" in a normative measure, it merely represents the portion of production being received by works in the form of wages. It is the extension of this graph here
/r/MensRights11/08/15 09:35 PM
3

http://i.imgur.com/rszvZHe.gif I will continue posting this graph until my fingers are bloody stumps. The correct measure of wages is not whole dollars, but the portion of their output the worker recieves. All progressive and socialist thinking prior to feminism was agreed upon this. The goal of feminsim is two fold. 1) Debase wages below subsistance levels, the force working people to negitiate them back up under the moniker of "living wage". 2) Establish a gender caste system where women can d…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:40 PM
12

Ahhh yes, the old closing the wage gap tactic Petty bourgouis swine.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:29 PM
2

But what if Casey Anthony exemplified the first fully-realized post-modern woman; a woman so determined to break the shackles of civic duty, gender rigidity, and social expectation that she violently rebelled against the system… The author gets half the story, but not all of it. The issue is not that the post modern women want to shatter civic duty ect ect, they only want to shatter THEIR civic duty. Mens civic duty must be kept firmly in place. It is put best by john locke: because it may be to…
/r/MensRights10/08/15 04:33 AM
2

For humans, like all social animals, hierarchy is a hard-wired phenomenon that is very hard to shake off. We evolved both to co-operate, but also to compete. In balance these two forces worked fine: just as in any herd or flock, things settled down when everyone had their place. High status males had greater reproductive advantage – they fathered more offspring who were more likely to survive. Being indifferent to social status led rapidly to one's genes disappearing from the pool. Is it just me…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 03:21 PM
1

i am not seeing a pm from you, but then i just got into two pretty hefty PM arguments, so i might have gotten buried. I do not view the goal of feminism as "Men are Evil" but rather as "Men are Serfs". I genuinely consider the feminist movement to be Neo Fuedalist, that is they feel them a small group of people have been divinely inspired by god to rule the world, and everyone else must blindly submit to the authority of the chosen rulers. It is the gender inversion of Robert Filmer.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:51 AM
3

"The best thing is to seize a country whole and intact, to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So to it is better to seize an army, a battalion, or a platoon intact then to destroy them." - sun tzu You are assuming my goal is to get them to quietly go away...oh my no, why in heavens name would i waist this opportunity when i can try to recruit 2500 new MRA's? By presenting the same questions they are asking in a forum without feminists censoring the answers, we can give them alternative conte…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:45 AM
2

After all the yelling I have had to do, someone finally gets it. Upvote to the MOON!
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:05 PM
0

Hey pot, its kettle. Get stuffed.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 09:27 PM
1

http://i.imgur.com/65EIvMW.gif As the supply of a comodity increases, what happens to its price again? So if the number of people trying to find jobs increases, wages will...?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:34 PM
12

http://imgur.com/a/w0oaq signs of domestic violence (from post top of page) Make you feel guilty about the children Threaten to take children away. Not allow you access to family income Take your money. Be the one who defines mens and womens roles Treat you like a servant Any of these sound familiar in CSA's treatment of you?
/r/MensRights03/08/15 02:11 PM
1

Corrections due to inflation are justified, if for no other reason then historically they have never exceeded GDP. As to your second point, they are earned by staying out of my way. Seriously, do you have any idea how much fast my day would go if i only had to work with people who wanted to be at their jobs, doing their jobs? ALOT. I do not pull numbers out of my butt, i get them from empirical data. if you want me to run through it, please have the decency to ask politely at least.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 08:36 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT3q8tba_lw watch that a few time princess and get back to us, ok?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 06:08 AM
0

Ok, first, no, the number is not arbitrary, though i did opps, it should have been $13500 annually. It is based upon http://livingwage.mit.edu/metros/19100 The difference between a 2 adult and a 1 adult household is $13500. Thus, the basic income granted is enough to support a dependent adult (a housewife or househusband). As the point is to support a nonworking adult, it can be objectively measure and should not suffer undue increases. You seem to be confusing a UBI with a form of wage. UBI is …
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:36 AM
1

non sequiter. That is not what i just proposed, if you would like me to explain, i happily will.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:57 AM
1

and I think the hilarious part here is that the comment they used is an argument about the exact thing they are doing...
/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:22 AM
3

Universal basic income is critical. Allowing men to stop functioning as ATM's by refusing to work if it is not in our narrow self interest to do so would shatter gynocenterism. In addition, it would elivate wages and cripple feminism. I have no issue paying someone $11,000 to sit on their ass if my pay increases by $20,000.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:56 AM
1

my apologizes i had read it as you thought wealth centralization was a good thing.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:02 PM
2

You forgot the /s.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:48 AM
10

oh, you wanted methodology, that i have, it is simply no one was recording data at the time. http://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/George/grgPP4.html#Book%20I,%20Chapter%203 For instance, on American whaling ships the custom is not to pay fixed wages, but a "lay," or proportion of the catch, which varies from a sixteenth to a twelfth to the captain down to a three-hundredth to the cabin-boy. Thus, when a whaleship comes into New Bedford or San Francisco after a successful cruise, she carries i…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 01:03 AM
10

Made it on Open Office. That is why i cite the formula.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:36 AM
0

"Women like to act as if commanding men’s attention is their birthright, their natural due, and they are rarely contradicted," Fixed that for her.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:15 PM
22

the closure of the wage gap has occurred entirely at the expense of men for no gain my women at all. http://i.imgur.com/rszvZHe.gif Share agency = Median income / (GDP/National employment)
/r/MensRights25/07/15 09:59 PM
2

And for some reason they are confused why there is an MRM.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 09:48 AM
-1

the closure of the wage gap has occurred entirely at the expense of men for no gain my women at all. http://i.imgur.com/rszvZHe.gif Share agency = Median income / (GDP/National employment)
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:18 AM
6

No, my goal is to abolish wage slavery, not replace one set of petty bourgeois with another.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:10 AM
2

But...but what about all those articles saying women really want house husbands! All the feminists told me that women wanted a man who stayed at home cooking and cleaning. And I was just learning how to knit blankies! runs away sobbing More seriosly though, I am begining to think the radfem butches I listened talking back in college might not have been as stupid as I thought. This is a sumation of their reasoning Premise 1. Women want parteners who make more money then they do. Premise 2. Struct…
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:33 AM
3

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_Bus_Boycott This is not etiquitte, it is segregation.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:28 PM
1

We do not live in a rape culture. This is a rape culture http://www.rt.com/news/213615-isis-sex-slave-children/ http://en.shiapost.com/2014/12/09/isis-issues-fatwa-to-rape-a-child/ http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/30/world/meast/isis-female-slaves/index.html and GMP is a bunch of idiots.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 03:31 PM
4

This is one of those time when i really, really wish we had things like a budget. It would be so awesome to run exactly the same experiment with women.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 12:47 AM
0

"The point is that it should be women who choose, not men — even the men they’re married to.' Do i need to repeat proudhon at this point? Or simply state that feminism desires men to be property of their wives, but not vice versa?
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:38 AM
1

If coercion is used, then how does this violate one's legal rights? I'd like to see some evidence of this. If coercion is used...that directly violates multiple amendments of the constitution! What evidence do you need other then the founding text of all legal authority? I'd also like to know what you think of a person who is driving a reportedly stolen car being pulled over. Is the driver guilty presumed guilty by default or are the police simply ascertaining knowledge pertaining to what happen…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:14 AM
3

Having had multiple people say those words to me and proceed to do jack and shit... Yes.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:06 PM
1

Having reduced you to ad hominim after ad hominim, you think I am going to cry? Interesting, but no. And the only impediment to communication is you confusing walrus with sealion.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:00 PM
1

"The workers retain, after all wages have been paid, a natural and inalienable right to an equal share of the value their labor has created" -- pierre joseph proudhon http://i.imgur.com/65EIvMW.gif http://i.imgur.com/NXyCio7.gif http://i.imgur.com/rszvZHe.gif I consider it a fairly basic point that when the supply of a comodity increases, its price falls. I also consider it a fairly basic point that labor is currently a comodity. Th influx of women into the labor market, with no accomidation for…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 04:54 PM
1

O.o. Did you read any part of that after the first sentance?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:12 PM
1

Very well, let it never be said I am not willing to allow someone to prove their claim with evidence. http://m.imgur.com/piqFLQX Send your members to politicalcompass.org and have them report to you their scores. Graph themn post it, and let us compair.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:08 PM
1

You are missing the conotations sir. Suicide victims are not the pawns, they are the casualties. This is something I am trying to argue into the MRA vernacular, so I will use it here. Titleledge; all obligations come with entitlements. If I am obligated to follow the laws, then I am entitled to a fair and impartial trial. If the trials are kangeroo courts, then why should I care what the laws say? If I am obligated to act as providor, I am entitled to near exclusive labor markets. Have no obliga…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 04:30 AM
1

Oh boy, I disagree with a number of things here. they and their rapist are both witnesses. Non sequiter. We have a right not to self incriminate, and with good reason. Police coercion in high profile cases is rampant, and even in other cases it occurs far to often. If there is physical evidence that consent did not take place, that would be enough to suggest that said rape did indeed take place, I am sorry, but how would you have evidence that something did not happen? I can understand how you w…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:02 AM
1

My appologies then, I was under the mis-impression I was adressing a neofuedalist. May I offer you a 6 hour youtube video by way of appology? http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0nD5A9PoxlM
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:07 AM
1

Ad hominim. My point is exceedingly simple, and indevigual has no reason to aknowledge a system that does nothing but hurt them. To allow a few person to claim to themselves the riches of nature will unquestionably result in privation for those not among the elect. Thus, the only course under which such a system could be sustained is violence.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:23 AM
1

I do not know what world you are looking at, but is see nothing of the sort. I see small minded petty thugs squandering the bounty of nature. I see a world with enough and more for everyone, wasted in the most stupid manner by imbiciles lacking all vision. If these are what you call leaders, then we would be better in a hobbsian state of nature, they would damage only the area they physicly occupied. Oh, and "Is/ought" fallasy btw.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:27 AM
1

Non sequiter. The origin of rights is my autonomy as an indevigual, not my ability to hurt others. Though I may occationally have to use force to defend my autonomy, it is the autonomy and not the force from which the rights spring. I quote Ruessou Again, should I happen to meet with a man so much stronger than myself, and at the same time so depraved, so indolent, and so barbarous, as to compel me to provide for his sustenance while he himself remains idle; he must take care not to have his eye…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:35 PM
6

In answer to her question, nothing. Men, having no stake in the continuation of civil society, have no obligation to contribute towards its continuance. It is, I feel, long past time for us to draw a larger destinction between natural rights and what are currently called social rights. I do not need a government to speak, and thus speech is a natural right. I need a government to have a trial, and thus fair and impartial trials are a titleledge. Wait, "Titleledge"? What is that? It is the term I…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:44 PM
2

You're presuming that consent is the default, then there is indeed no default. We do not know what had taken place, and we therefor need to investigate. You're claiming that one positive claim is immune from a burden of proof while another is not, the one that is indeed immune being the one of consent being given. I am either missunderstanding you or I would rather not explore the alternitive. First, presumption of innocence means that not breaking the laws is the defualt assumption. If we do no…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:08 AM
1

Wait, I thought the new york thing was for colleges only, they are actually trying to impliment this state wide? ROFL.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:59 AM
1

Gimme a second, the college closed so the full text might be gone. EDIT My phone cannot handle pdf and the wiki they set up got axed. When I get somewhere with internet I will get you that thread. If you wanna feel impatiant, google "Antioch SOPP". FIRE has a good breakdown on the first page.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:58 AM
2

I am not misleading my readers, any more then any more then the author of "The racist tree" is missleading their readers. But if you are absolutely hellbent on an example, here, have one I stumbled across. https://np.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/3cvui3/uh_this_is_kinda_bullshit/cszpcbx?context=3 unconditionally investigated. Define "Unconditionally". Does this mean ignoring due process? a verification of where each party was when the attack took place, a look at DNA evidence, rape kits, None of wh…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:57 AM
2

My story is not an acurate protrayal of anything, it is a story, it is there to illistrait a point. The point being, it is impossible to prove something occured if one person has a vested interest in lying. Please provide a concrete citation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence I presume that you believe that those who make false accusations ought to be punished by law. With that said, you need to prove that accusation is indeed false. You presume correctly. However, your co…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:56 AM
6

You're making baseless assertions pertaining to the dynamics between rapists and their victims, claims that victims are lying harpies (which is baseless), trivializes actions that are non-consensual suzy takes chad home, enthusiastic consent is given all around, and chad leaves the next morning. Reading comprehension is a good skill. If I accuse you of stealing my wallet, and you are indeed in possession of my wallet, it needs to be proven that you and I consented to giving you my wallet. I have…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:12 PM
0

I am going to speak herasy now. This precisely why, at this exact moment, the MHRM needs to move hard left and declair itself the vanguard of the laboring class (who are mostly men BTW). You are all, I would hope familiar with a motte and bailey doctrine. I offer this parrable from sun tzu (cannot find it, hurrey phone). A general, attacking a strongly defended fortress in a river valley, gave to his luetenants dozens of flags and ordered them to take a small force up the hill and awate his sign…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:01 PM
12

You are discussing a women who by her own admission did not expiereance and orgasm until her late 20's, who has made a career out of telling other women how to enjoy sex. Guys, guys stop laughing, I am certain ms greene is very sincere and has some wonderful suggestions we all should listen to.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:38 PM
31

Antioch college alum! I sat in the meeting where this was discussed. Also, feminists are currently campaigning for women not to be jailed, ever, so no, charging her with blackmail would be pointless.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:02 PM
6

Not that I am aware of, but then would anything more really be nessesary? Between gamergate and this consent nonsence, I am suprised we have grown this little. People are waking up to the fact that feminists are treating men as property, there for women to use and abuse. "Men exist to make us happy, they have no reason to be happy themselves" is not a message most men are going to like hearing.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:04 PM
143

Well, Duh! How many times do I have to repeat, consent rules are not about "grey rape", they are about blackmailing young men into abusive relationships. Lemme do this again. chad and suzy hook up at a party, suzy takes chad home, enthusiastic consent is given all around, and chad leaves the next morning. A few days later chad gets a phone call. "I want a relationship" says suzy. "Um, we agreed that was ONS only" replies chad. "Well I don't seem to remember you asking to kiss my left nipple afte…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:58 PM
2

The number of hampsters run to death for this article is astounding. I particularly like this gem. Men don’t operate this way. Men don’t live to satisfy a so-called female gaze. No men live to satisfy female consumption. Our gaze does not slowly kill you, your spending the money produced by our callories slowly kills us. This is a concept called wage slavery.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 08:42 PM
1

So I am curios, does anyone know what precentage of women in the mary koss rape study said they where raped?
/r/MensRights12/07/15 07:08 PM
1

A government is someone who does not ask you first if you want to submit to their rule. Shuffling goalposts. Your original definition of a government was "the legitimate use of force". Now you are defining it as the impossition of force without consent. How is something I have not consented to (particularly the use of force) ever legitimate? Social and/or economic ostracism, public ridicule, and even nonmonopolistic violence. And this is where anarchist capitalism falls appart. If contracts can …
/r/MensRights12/07/15 03:04 PM
1

I would like to take this moment for a breif musical interlude to reflect my sadness at chairman poa's loss. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BBZ7AfZR9xs
/r/MensRights11/07/15 08:19 PM
1

A proper argument to "socialism is not a valid ideology to believe in" should contain "socialism" in it. Semantics. Your arguement against socialism was premised on the labor theory of value, which is contained in marx and very few other socialists (proudhon and kropotkin being anarchist socialists). So you are saying that without a government (DEFINITION: a thing with a monopoly on the use of force in a geographical location) people will not be able to make agreements with each other and theref…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:33 PM
1

Your implication is false. Marx's writtings where intended as a criteque of the economic theories of his day, thus his use of the prevailing theory of value is valid as it was the prevailing theory. As newer theories have emerged, newer writters have critequed them. Anarchist capitalism is internally inconsistant, and thus illogical. Proudhon adresses this indetail in "what is property". Breifly, property in tools grants property in products soley by force of the state. In a stateless society, c…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 06:34 AM
1

I beg to differ. For example your above statement has no relation to my or your previos statements.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:26 AM
1

Are you aware that at the time marx was writting all economics was based on the labor theory of value?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:58 AM
1

http://m.imgur.com/piqFLQX And for anyone confused how liberal anarchism could possibly function http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=c0DIly2oT8g#watch_actions What we want is not a redistribution of overcoats, although it must be said that even in such a case, the shivering folk would see advantage in it. Nor do we want to divide up the wealth of the Rothschilds. What we do want is so to arrange things that every human being born into the world shall be ensured the opportunity in the first instance of …
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:40 AM
2

Reasons I love truck driving, the industry is so desperate that they will hire anyone with a valid CDL.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 11:59 PM
5

None. Google "Antioch College". The school was small and smart. There where no actual hearings, the student was told to leave, placed on achedemic suspension, and never readmitted. "Walk away quietly and no one knows this happened". This was made simple by the "no test, no grade" AKA "if you do not get a D, you pass" system. No one made an issue becouse it was never worth it, you walk out the door and straight into another college as if nothing had happened, becouse everyone in any possition of …
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:40 PM
9

Sir, I am an alumnus of antioch college, and. having dealt with consent rules there, it is most certainly NOT about grey rape. First, to the people writting these rules, there is no grey rape, all P in V sex is rape. It is a question of if a female allows a male to rape her, and what punishment she decides to inflict upon him in return. Lemme be more clear, with an example I have seen so many times it was horrifying. Chad and sarah have sex, ONS, consent all the way. Sarah calls chad the next mo…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:24 PM
1

Whether I do or do not understand slang is of no relevance to the debate, thus the assertion "you do not understand slang. Gotcha" is an attack on my person, an ad hominem. I understand falacies very well thankyou.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:53 AM
1

Ad hominem. And my arguement is above.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:38 AM
46

Do you think any of the cretins passing this garbage realize the the only purpose to consent rules is to ban men from college campuses? Do they seriosly believe an actual rapist is going to give a fuck about consent? These are trap laws designed by radfem's. They are deliberatly impossible to follow.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:19 AM
9

Um, insofar as you must prove you received a "yes", it is guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:16 AM
10

This space is actually the most productive thing we could be doing right now, as distracted as we get sometimes. What we need is a coherant social theory supported by evidence to counter both patriarchy theory and tradcon. It must be coherant, internally conststant, and easily replicated into soundbytes. And no PUA is not it, PUA is a dating techneque, we need a social thoery, and as a social theory PUA is staggeringly anti social.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:45 AM
1

I do not have two hooka stems in my mouth, I am not laying anywhere with anyone, I am not currently having sex with or without peanut butter, and you have yet to adress any arguements. I repeat, Non Sequiter.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter