TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LumpyStatistician162 Archive

View 6 posts and 109 comments by LumpyStatistician162 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Its logical to lose libido during menopause
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 06:56 PM
1

People on Reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 06:51 PM
1

People say it
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 05:12 PM
1

Testimonials
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 04:18 PM
1

Amongst lions and elephants for instance the older males monopolize the women
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 04:09 PM
0

If you don’t mind, could you give me an example of an animal in the wild that does that ?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 02:55 PM
1

Yeah but sex drive differences seem to confirm this
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 02:54 PM
1

Yeah I should have said sexless rather than alone
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 02:17 PM
1

So what ? From a biological perspective morals aren’t there so they don’t care about a child being born unwell, from a selfish perspective the male just wants to breed and a woman in menopause has a lower sex drive than him, yes there could be problems etc. But for the male it could be biologically optimal, and for the women, having a dead husband during menopause could be optimal also, I am sure a ton of women find Ronaldo attractive even tho he is above 40 for instance. We are not talking abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 02:09 PM
1

Its because in the past humans used to be more healthy their whole lives, think of animals for instance, you never hear about an animal being old and less active compared to younger peers
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 02:05 PM
0

Yeah but perhaps men would be sad if alone
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 02:02 PM
1

Yeah but sex slavery wasn’t about violence, it was about guys wanting to own people, the Romans were not that bad; otherwise they would have been beaten by a coalition of opponents, the reason they even ruled over everyone is because at least they gave them good treatment when conquered, there is no reason for why disciplined Romans would want to dehumanize people that are not direct fighting opponents to them; I know that empathy isn’t a value here but it’s just too gruesome to randomly do rath…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 12:50 PM
0

Is there a study about this tho ? I am talking about natural menopause and no meds involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 12:44 PM
1

How old are you ?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 12:43 PM
1

My point is that biologically older men would just monopolize the younger females while the younger men do nothing, same as lions
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 12:43 PM
1

Not if the guy is successful, has money and is fit and handsome. But anyways, biologically speaking the risk is high but raising an autistic kid isn’t that crazy, the thing is the difference in desire here plays a big role.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 12:01 PM
1

Sperm quality decline isn’t that bad but what u an saying is that the difference in desire in menopause might indicate what I say
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 11:51 AM
2

Yeah but that’s amazing biologically because if menopause
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 11:44 AM
-1

No, my point is that it is biologically optimal for us humans to have age gaps where the man is way older which could guarantee the total exploitation of the fertility window without the man feeling sad that he can’t mate, in the past men were virgins until 40 and then started banging 20 year olds
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 11:43 AM
1

Not really, 50 year old guys still appear to be horny, if what you said was true guys wouldn’t complain about menopause, they want to reproduce because they can their whole life but now their spouse does not want it because she’s the same age, it would be optimal for them to be dead before
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 11:41 AM
-1

Yes, before menopause.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 03:21 AM
1

Yeah but there are a lot of 40 year old guys that in top shape, it’s possible. But anyways, the main point here is that when women hit menopause the difference of desire with a same age partner is so massive and flagrant that it seems to be biologically optimal to have age gaps
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 02:50 AM
-1

Not if he takes care of himself and trains, for instance LeBron and Tom Brady are in their 40s, or Ronaldo for instance, yes they are examples but they still stand very well
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 02:35 AM
1

Well I thought about it but old guys said that if they had an attractive 20 year old that wanted to sleep with them they wouldn’t have ED and would be horny af, so perhaps it’s all a question of perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 02:05 AM
0

I am not doing well because I am autistic and decided to stay celibate my whole life, nothing has to with however I behave because I don’t talk to much people anyways
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 01:58 AM
1

That’s exactly what I said at the end, women cannot reproduce post menopause, but my point is that it does seem like it’s biologically optimal to have large age gaps
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 01:55 AM
1

All I said is that it made more sense, perhaps I am wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 01:33 AM
1

If we think about it, there is biologically no reason for men to be attracted to women past their menopause since sadly they cannot be fertile anymore and that sexual attraction is subconsciously tied to reproduction, men can be fertile their whole life (sperm quality changes but they are still fertile so my point stands) while women have menopause so therefore by this conclusion the biological optimal is that men were meant to be out once their wife goes through menopause so everyone is happy. …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 01:09 AM
1

Why would the high ranking guys allow other men to take what they consider theirs ? Men are often jealous for atttacive women, especially Romans, the Muslims for instance had a slave market, I bring these guys up because their slavery system is well documented. Romans would have a slave market too, basically like someone that has a car wouldn’t let every random guy drive it, someone that owns a slave wouldn’t let anyone take it. They were organized which made their strenght.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 01:08 AM
-2

I am 19
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 01:03 AM
-15

Yes, it’s still optimal if we consider all the downsides and benefits together
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 12:45 AM
1

Because young attractive women are not infinite when you capture a territory, so they must have went to the higher ranking guys that also did polygamy
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 12:18 AM
-13

The reason I did not want that argument was because it doesn’t really matter for selfish males in a biological level because they still want to mate
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 12:09 AM
1

Where did you get that info from ? Take a look at any tribe today, grape isn’t an issue since they are small groups
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 12:07 AM
1

Not 30, 60
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 11:05 PM
1

No, unfortunately this seems to never happen, older men were always pervs, especially in prehistory for instance. Older males banged the younger women while younger guys waited, chimps do that and gorillas do that
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:57 PM
1

In the past young guys like me didn’t get to mate while older guys that were 38-60 were banging all the younger women, it’s a privilege I have now to be able to mate without being smoked by older guys, a modern privilege. I kinda have the impostor syndrome
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:53 PM
1

Well I hope you are right but 50 year old guys are pretty good at sex apparently so old guys are still very horny, for instance not to get weird but Johnny Sins is 47.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:51 PM
1

Because not all guys could do that, the higher ranking officers did that while the normal soldiers mostly didn’t, so most guys that were recruits did not get laid
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:49 PM
1

Well I am above that when it comes to normal humans, I am autistic, it’s kinda of a superpower, if I don’t thrive to mate I will separate myself from mammals that thrive to mate and therefore become even better than I am by taking away animalistic desires. Biology and psychology does not apply to me anyways since as I said I am autistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:48 PM
1

What makes you say that ?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:41 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:38 PM
0

I am absolutely not, take the time to think about my claim and you’ll notice it makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:38 PM
0

No, exercice is good for health and always stays even if goes a bit worse, sex is an intense desire, it cannot be compared to anything else. You said that if an older guy has sex with money he has no game, I simply informed you that most women don’t actually like 50-70 year old guys as sexually optimal for them, so my point was to know how 64 year old guys bang 20 year old women with ease and no money
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:34 PM
0

Not if he has money, is fit, attractive and charismatic. That’s how it went in the past, virgin Roman soldiers came back home and married women half their age.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:32 PM
-1

You don’t know what it is to be a guy, it’s a simple that women in their 20s are the most attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:28 PM
1

No, if you stay single until 42 and date an 18 year old you would feel good because when you die your partner will still be attractive and young, that sounds amazing
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:27 PM
0

Well I am thinking about what is optimal, if I date now my partner would be 60 when I am 60, maybe I would be sad, I don’t get why suicide rates aren’t higher amongst older men tbf, not all of them bang 20 year olds
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:27 PM
1

Al Pacino had a kid at 83
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:22 PM
0

Perhaps the ideal for men is to stay single until 42 and then date an 18 year old; that way when they die their wife is still attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:22 PM
1

Tell me one single reason why 60 year old guys would be desirable to 20 year old men except money, maybe a 40 year old could be desirable but not a 60-70 year old or perhaps I’m dumb but I don’t often witness women getting wet over guys that are 64 rather than wanting to bang a 24 year old athletic guy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:17 PM
0

Yeah but he is still fertile himself, his sperm would be and but he would be selfish like most animals
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:14 PM
1

Yes, just biologically speaking it makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:10 PM
-1

Yes, I didn’t actually want to make that conclusion but older guys love to say that they like younger women because of biology so I guess they can’t all be lying. Technically it doesn’t make sense for any man to want to date a post menopausal women since desire is subconsciously tired to reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:09 PM
-1

Not when I’m 60 probably
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:05 PM
-1

You didn’t get it, I am not scared of nor getting laid now, my point is that once I get older I would still want sex from the same age range of women
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:00 PM
1

Yeah but do you have a link stating mercenaries were a lot at the end ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:17 PM
1

Yeah but they still have access tho, they are sad because they feel like it’s in their reach, coupling men and women in the same age range in the education system is a mistake if the American empire since now it would make guys believe young guys they are entitled to mate with 19-25 year old women when their value is different, this is literally the most attractive age range for women and guys that don’t have any achievement yet mate with them which creates an unbalanced society. Equality was a …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:16 PM
1

Yeah but that’s the point, older males would provide better and therefore younger women would go to them to have pregnancies that are better provided for, which is why young men mating could be a modern construct
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:09 PM
1

No, it’s just rich guys that battle each other, the French Revolution for instance was led by Robespierre, a prominent lawyer that came from a good family
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:10 PM
1

No ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:10 PM
1

Not at all, the aboriginal males married around 40 and the Zulu at 35 after their military service
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:09 PM
1

Because society has conditioned us perhaps
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:26 PM
0

No, it doesn’t really happen in tribal culture
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:22 PM
1

I was talking about young men not mating until the age of 35-40
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:20 PM
1

No, learn about Australian Aboriginals or Zulu for instance
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:16 PM
–

No, that’s actually good for the woman also, do you think Brad Pitt or Michael B. Jordan or attractive ? Most women would think so and they are both older guys, Daniel Craig for instance or even Will Smith. Or a more extreme example, Denzel Washington, I bet a lot of women are drooling over this guy even tho he’s old af.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:03 PM
–

What about Michael B. Jordan ? But anyways most women find Brad Pitt attractive, so my point here applies to the majority, older guys often are attractive if they take care of themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:01 PM
–

Don’t you view Brad Pitt as attractive ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:00 PM
–

The opposite doesn’t work, that doesn’t make sense here, you have to consider my arguments for both sides
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:59 PM
1

Well it’s very simply it’s because most men simply were not meant to mate, nobility is not an example I am talking about the general population, there is no morality that comes into play here, nobody is bound to do anything, it’s basically as if the Lakers beat the Raptors with a 40 point lead and then blame the lakers because they went too harsh, it’s just the way of life and how nature works, most lions don’t mate, monogamy was socially enforced, at some point one man mated for 17 women
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:59 PM
–

Why wouldn’t my theory work ? I mean I keep noticing old pervs and I tell myself that perhaps it’s because society would be ideal with age gaps in that case old pervs wouldn’t be tortured by being old pervs that get no play while younger guys focus their energy on money
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:38 PM
1

How do you know that ? I thought they just stayed chaste until 40. It’s all assumptions anyways
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:37 PM
–

So what ? The point here is that the woman’s fertility window is extended so more tries.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:35 PM
–

Well everything comes down to the fact that most guys kinda are more attracted the same age range of 20s, so in that case it makes sense to enjoy it the most by doing nothing at first and marrying at 40 and dying happily instead of dying with an older mate
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:34 PM
–

Yeah but perhaps biologically it is optimal, because the amount of old pervs make me thing that most men are most attracted to women in their 20s because of higher fertility; so in that case to avoid becoming an old sad perv it would be optimal to do nothing until 40 and then marry a 20 year old and die happily while your partner is relatively young
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:25 PM
–

Wdym by generally speaking ? Wouldn’t that create a super army of fanatical guys ? Think about empires restraining mate access to the young guy's to ge them to be reckless in battle and have nothing to lose and channel their energy. The Australian Aboriginals and Zulu for instance do that exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:23 PM
–

What does my age have to do with anything here, no offense, I was just V wondering. But anyways, I brought yo the benefits for both genders, did I seem to favor the benefits for older guys ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:21 PM
–

Because it’s fairly logical that they had time to accumulate resources, except if they are bums but that’s not what we’re are talking about here, younger men would be screwed for a moment yes but imagine them getting married at 50 and being happy that they will die before their spouse getting old. Most guys are attracted the most to women in their 20s so it makes sense that age gaps are optimal here, young guys would not get laid until 40 and then marry, if they got laid at 20 they would have to…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:16 PM
–

It is biologically optimal also which translates to psychologically optimal, and dating a guy that makes a million a year is advantageous even for western women
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:13 PM
1

Not at all, who even told you that ? What tribes are you talking about ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:12 PM
–

Yeah but perhaps nature optimized that for age gaps, the amount of old pervs there are serve as an argument for me, so many old pervs hope to hook up with women half their age, so basically it would mean that there is a biological drive to it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:09 PM
–

Yes they are all rich
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:08 PM
–

Wouldn’t that make more sense to have an age gap since older guys could provide and hunt better because of experience, in an ancestral context, with no consideration of money
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:07 PM
–

How ? It seems to make sense biologically; perhaps the reason most guys are attracted to women in their 20s is because in nature older men would mate with younger women while younger men do nothing at all
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:02 PM
–

What would be up the list in your opinion ? Not societally but biologically, except semen quality is there any biological argument because I seem to win the biological debate with my points here, men and women have different fertility windows and sperm quality is a minor factor
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:00 PM
1

Do you have any link that talks about what you said ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:58 PM
1

Well no it matters, if the American empire today wants to take down Iran they need a ground invasion, they aren’t going to control an enormous motivated people with drones and air strikes, the regime isn’t falling without ground war, it’s very simply and generals have said that often, however the American young men are less likely to want to risk their life for economical interests because they can have access to dating now and are more comfortable, if they had no mate they could become fanatica…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:57 PM
–

This argument is redundant, the risks are minimal and even tho there are risk the consequence itself isn’t that bad, your child is autistic, so what ? He is is still a normal human being
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:52 PM
–

Yes, because their partner would always be attractive, basically not hooking up or dating until 40 and then wifing up a 20 year old
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:51 PM
–

Autism and bipolar disorder are not that bad, it’s different but it’s not a bad thing per se, it could bring good points so the argument is bad here, and compared to the providing benefits this relationship gives the downsides would be minimal
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:49 PM
1

Explain why ? Wasn’t that basically what Roman soldiers did ? Fight in the army and then come back and marry younger. What would cause the collapse ? Wouldn’t that create the optimal scenario where birth rates are maximized since women maximize their fertility window while older men provide more for each of the children
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:43 PM
–

Well if he dies it doesn’t really matter anyways was my point, she would be a rich widow
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:42 PM
–

I always hear this rumour but I never came over real life examples of old man sperm being bad
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:32 PM
1

Where did you get that info from ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:38 AM
1

Its a paradox, would that make them less depressed to Nate young with a same age partner and get old with her or if they don’t date young and marry a 20 year old once they hit 40 and have the chance to die before she gets old
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:38 AM
1

So wouldn’t that prove my point that young guys not mating is better for society ? They could channel it into the army or into the economy for instance and create a greater empire, Rome fell because of the stupidity of the last emperors. Young guys feeling like they would get a reward when older could motivate them better, it would make them more fearless and careless when fighting because they have no potential mate to look forward to and be less risky for. It’s ideal for armies
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:41 AM
1

I am a 19 year old guy, just saying that before I get called a creep. A 20 year old woman that marries a 42 year old rich guy would be provided for and not worry about money, at the same time she would also get to be a rich widow if everything goes well once her husband passes away and it is known that widows do way better than the opposite, she also maximizes her fertility window and the most important thing is that she always feels young compared to him which boosts her ego. For the guy he wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:40 AM
3

No, that’s the opposite for the Romans and Greeks, Aristotle said the ideal age of marriage for women was 18 while it was 42 for men, if you have sources that would show your point I’ll be glad to review them. The Romans are actually my main example, soldiers could not marry so when they came back home at 40 they married younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:33 AM
1

Why are most of the leaders in Native American societies older ? It’s because they would have more status that comes with experience, there is a study that says that the hunting peak for men is between 35 to 50. But anyways the main thing that would come with age would be status which would therefore have been very attractive. Idk why you specified monogamy tho I never spoke against it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:38 AM
1

That young men mating is a modern construct and that age gaps could be the natural optimal
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:21 AM
1

I know, but young men mating could be bad for society, lower birth rates since young men are most of the time not ready for children while older men are for instance
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:19 AM
1

Yeah but my point was that younger males mating that much is an advent of modernity you could talk about sneaky matings but I am talking about the rule rather than the exception
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:03 AM
0

Well that’s why in the past young men used to be used as soldiers for empires to grow so they could channel their energy and if they survived they came at 38-42 and married a 20 year old. But what do you think of the point of my post tho ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:59 AM
1

Yeah but that’s sneakier tho, most young males wouldn’t mate as the norm, my point here was to evaluate whether the optimal norm was same age range or age gap
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:57 AM
-1

Yeah but why would excess young males be bad news ? Do you agree with me that age gaps are perhaps the optimal relationship type over same age range (5 year range) ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:54 AM
0

Why do you say that and what do you exactly mean by pair marriage ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:48 AM
0

No, what proofs would you have for that specifically ? An older man in nature can provide better because of more experience and indicates ideal survival tactics because he lived that long, perhaps the sexual drive we have in our young age is because we need to channel it to become the best providers and then mate. But anyways the same thing applies to elephants and lions, they have the drive young but older guys still take all the women
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:25 AM
-1

Down, but they lived for pretty long, all empires rise and fall, nobody really stays forever
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter