TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MRA_TitleIX Archive

View 33 posts and 527 comments by MRA_TitleIX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1280

False AccusationMRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights22/05/22 03:42 PM
457

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights22/02/23 05:46 PM
257

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/23 11:46 PM
224

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:37 PM
163

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights13/12/22 10:35 PM
143

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:09 AM
136

Activism/SupportMRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:58 PM
133

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/22 08:19 PM
130

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/22 05:43 PM
126

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 01:25 PM
117

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/21 09:24 PM
107

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/22 06:50 PM
103

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 02:01 PM
80

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights13/09/22 02:52 PM
77

legal rightsMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/22 09:41 PM
71

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/21 07:12 PM
65

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/22 12:47 PM
63

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights20/07/22 05:45 PM
53

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/21 06:30 PM
43

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights20/11/22 12:23 AM
42

ActivismMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/22 06:53 PM
41

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:53 PM
26

legal rightsMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/22 03:14 PM
25

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/21 04:07 PM
24

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights14/05/22 04:42 PM
22

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:48 AM
20

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights18/03/22 02:36 PM
16

educationMRA_TitleIX/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/22 02:43 AM
14

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:54 PM
11

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:14 PM
7

ProgressMRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights19/11/21 04:04 PM
7

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights23/11/21 07:11 PM
5

Edu./Occu.MRA_TitleIX/r/MensRights23/04/22 08:02 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I am not a lawyer, I don't even have formal training in law. This isn't legal advice. If you want legal advice, talk to a lawyer, many give free consultations and given your situation you may even get free (contingency based) representation in court. Everything I say is based on opinion and experiences with Title IX as an activist, sometimes I am wrong. Listen to your lawyer over anything I say. Title IX is a funding regulation at it's heart. If your school has a Title IX office, I presume it is…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 12:14 AM
5

On it! Thanks for the ping
/r/MensRights20/06/23 11:38 PM
36

EDIT: Filed a complaint with NASA this morning. Read a copy of what I filed here. Lmfao. Cedar Crest College, was named as a recipient. They have this thing where men can only take classes at night when the polite folk aren't around. It was right around covid when they had a large uptick in men applying to them. Their acceptance rate for men cratered to being lower than the most prestigious unis in the country. Women still had an ~80% acceptance rate though. The office of civil rights said it wa…
/r/MensRights11/06/23 02:50 PM
16

I'm very interested in that person filing 80% of the complaints. 20 a day? There is no fucking way that is a single person. I can't fathom it being anything less than a team of people filing under a single name. Wouldn't even be surprised if it was a pseudonym. The note about it being primarily athletics-based complaints is interesting. It explains why the public resolutions by OCR are so heavily dominated by athletics issues. I was thinking it was a focus for OCR, but it looks like it's just be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/23 03:36 AM
2

OP, is this in the United States? If yes, is this a public high school?
/r/MensRights31/05/23 01:54 PM
1

I wonder if guys could use this to go after docs the circumcised them.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 01:40 PM
1

It also does not only protect women, but certain folks get very angry when it's used to benefit men. I think schools will do whatever protects them. Title IX offices are basically like a federally mandated HR-like office. They pretend to care but will fuck you over in a heartbeat if it is the best for the school. Title IX is used a way for the school to say "but we did it by the book!" The same reason a coach can abuse students for years and get away with it has the same set of underlying issues…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/23 12:09 PM
8

But what can we do to change the parents' awareness? Normalize fathers being seen as a full fledged parents. Can't expect things to change if people don't see fathers as valid caregivers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/23 05:03 PM
53

People will interrupt your meetings with protest, blow whistles into your ear and send death threats and bomb threats. All these things have happened. This is exactly why I don't reveal my identity in my activism. People are nuts and I'm not in a position in life where I can afford to deal with losing my job and all the bullshit that would throw at me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 03:42 AM
1

Was reading the wiki page on this and found this bit interesting. However, the National Woman's Party found the amendment to be unacceptable and asked it to be withdrawn whenever the Hayden rider was added to the ERA.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:24 AM
2

You are absolutely welcome here. There are also a number of active women in the discord.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:11 AM
5

Texas A&M did something similar to a guy. The Title IX coordinator assigned his complaint to someone they knew was going on maternity leave. This kept it from being "officially" filed while they railroaded him. The denied consideration of his complaint in the hearings because it wasn't ever officially filed. It's good for people to talk about this, because the reality for guys is that even reporting can be dangerous. Its more common than people realize.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/23 06:39 PM
1

I was agreeing with you and elaborating a bit. Should have been clearer on that haha.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:12 PM
1

Title IX coordinator protecting her gender ofcourse. In my experience of what I have seen, it is typically about protecting the school. There is a lot more support for women who were wronged. There would be major news about it. There would be organizations helping fund the case. Guys don't have the same kind of support so it's a lot easier for schools to protect themselves by pushing cases a particular way that minimizes their risk. Sure there might be bias involved unrelated to the risk balanci…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:11 PM
3

One could argue that the risk of litigation should reduce such behavior but it seems the opposite is true. Litigation works in the schools favor. Most people can't afford it. Most issues won't go to court for financial reasons. I was once told, for a federal case against a school, expect 200k to walk in the door and go through all the basic shit expected. It goes up from there as things progress. Unless you have huge damages and/or a damn good case, you are fucked. What I have normally seen is a…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:46 PM
1

Mandatory penalties to Title IX violations by schools. Penalty is a % of endowments / funds etc with some scaling based on total student count. (I.e. it gets lower as a % with more students so it stays somewhat reasonable) Enforced by OCR. Collected by OCR with a finders fee awarded to the reporting party. The SEC did something similar with bounties. If a whistleblower provides information to the SEC needed to make / originate the case, they can get something like 15% of the recovered funds. It …
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:30 PM
3

I did a Title ix rundown on this school. When I have the time I need to go back to it with a fresh set of eyes (I stepped away for a bit on this for this reason). I found hundreds of violations spanning decades, including the school using them in advertising materials. They were promoting a professor that had sex quotas in their labs and groups for example. Perhaps with this hitting the news and this weekend free, its time to update and edit this banger of a complaint. It's something like 50 pag…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:26 PM
2

It confirms that it is important to check how people actually behave compared to how you think think they will behave. The overall take home message is that agencies should proceed with caution before introducing blind recruitment. So they find there is bias, but since it is the kind they like, it's fine. Therefore, the agencies should do studies so they can be sure they don't eliminate the "correct" type of discrimination. Yikes.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:17 PM
11

Take a look at my sub. Same name as my user name. If you know of anything at your university and want to work on providing me info so I can file a federal complaint, let's talk.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 04:45 PM
9

Sounds like a good 14th Amendment equal protection clause violation case.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 01:18 PM
1

Interesting. Doesn't surprise me at all. They continue to be resistant to inclusion, but the hammer might fall on them soon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/23 03:03 PM
1

5 of the "7 sisters" remain single sex. Private undergrads can be single sex if a few conditions are met. What you might not realize here is that TWU was forced to be coed by Title IX in 1972. Its a public coed school and they work hard to keep that gender gap. They are about 13% men.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 07:22 AM
2

Oh, TWU? The school that is declared "woman focused" as a matter of state law in violation of federal civil rights laws? The same school that is under a massive federal investigation for anti male discrimination spanning entire institutes and departments under the university system Going back decades? (My handiwork btw) The same school that blocked me on Twitter for announcing the investigation, in violation of my first amendment rights per court precedent? It's been added to the investigation t…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 07:05 AM
2

We are already seeing the loan debt framed as a gendered issue. I think you nailed where this is going.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 03:08 AM
9

Regarding the federal investigation into Texas Woman's University, I filed additional material regarding 10 more scholarships that are based on sex. Interestingly, this included a single scholarship limited to men in dance. This makes it the first scholarship discriminating against women that I have found and filed a complaint about. I don't limit myself to anti-male discrimination. It just happens to be what I find flagrantly advertised.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/23 02:15 AM
22

I feel this hard. People try and brand me as alt right for supporting men's rights. I'm left wing, I just don't identify with the American left, and that doesn't make me American right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/23 07:07 PM
4

Indeed. The school was even saying that it was adversely impacting enrollment.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 05:09 PM
6

This is exactly the issue with the name. This is a public coed school.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 05:07 PM
10

Hopefully it sticks this time. If the federal investigation into Texas Woman's University blows up in media, it might light a fire under their ass. I do think the president of MUW is trying their best. As far as public facing violations I normally look for, I can't find any for them. In fact, I don't really even see much dog whistling either. Compared to other Universities, MUW's public facing side is surprisingly compliant with Title IX.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 04:20 PM
10

This isn't the first time they tried, but it might be the try that gets it done. The current president of the school has said the name needs to be more inclusive as they are a coed school. Proposed names University of Northern Mississippi West Appalachia University University of Central Mississippi University of Eastern Mississippi Northern Mississippi University Callaway State University Weathersby State University Williams State University
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:58 PM
2

We have always been at war with Eurasia.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 04:15 AM
3

What people like me need is for yall to get out there and get talking with your politicians. I can't fix policy, but I can help identify the stuff that is broken so you can more effectively talk with your representatives. Until they see it as a way to get votes, they don't care.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 01:49 AM
8

Preach. No war but the class war. I would much rather see my tax dollars spent on full rides for first gen students from poor parents. Also on back to work programs for people who have been out of work for more than 6 months. Regardless of what demographic it ends up predominantly helping. Just don't discriminate
/r/MensRights23/02/23 01:38 AM
9

I mean this is good on one hand to correct the imbalance. But I don't particularly care for the outcome that we can't sex specific organizations. I think we need them, there are some things men can't enjoy in the presence of women, and vice versa. Sex segregated colleges are allowed. Ones funded by federal money are not (a very narrow legacy exception exists). Providing scholarships and funding based on sex has absolutely nothing to do with what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 12:20 AM
10

And if men are hurting isn't the answer to demand the same resources for men instead of taking them away? I'm not taking it away. I don't even have a say in it. This is now between the feds and TWU. All they had to do was not discriminate..... something they agreed to when they began taking federal money. If they discriminate that money can be pulled for violating the funding regulations.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 11:45 PM
7

Thanks! That is how we get real change. An activist like me can't get much done in the way of policy change without people getting vocal with their elected reps.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 11:42 PM
12

I wanted to ask about something. Do you think there is a sociatal gaslighting about the acceptance of gender exclusive opportunities by even private institutions ? Like for decades we got told that discrimination is bad, that men only thing is bad, that opportunities should be open to everyone, etc. But now we have plenty of women only things and when we point at them, we get told "nothing stop men from doing male only thing". I think we are being mislead on what discrimination is and what it lo…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:51 PM
40

It will probably rustle some feathers and get some changes at this school. I doubt we see any real important changes like changing the name of the school or the state law without media attention. My activism is mainly about understanding civil rights enforcement by OCR and identifying where the system is broken. That is a multi-year dialogue with OCR in the form of complaints and their response via dismissals/investigations/resolutions. The more we can get visibility on cases like this, the easi…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:05 PM
7

The letter is from 2018. There were news articles about it. This has been reported on and isn't new. If you read the link OP posted, it is incredibly vague with a lot of buzzwords. Shoddy reporting.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:29 PM
3

Thanks! In total this case probably took about 50 hours to put together initially, with another 25 to 50 in additional research and work to answer questions OCR had. My interactions with the investigator on this case have been nothing but positive. They seem to actually give a shit about it. The issues with this case are directly aligned with broader issues that come from regulation and top-down marching orders. I think this investigator is doing what they can on this within the agency imposed l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/23 05:50 PM

I have criticism regarding the case and OCR. I have no qualms with the investigator and believe they are doing a good job so far in an institution that can be difficult to work in. While I have encountered OCR attorneys handling cases that I didn't like, this investigator is not one of them. I have had other interactions with them and they seem genuine and ask good questions of me. They also opened a major investigation into a case I care about that isn't politically convenient and that takes co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/23 05:34 PM
2

The premise for this is that sexual harassment is considered sexual discrimination. And when that sexual harassment creates a hostile environment that limits someone's access to the things listed under Title IX, then that becomes a Title IX violation. The dear colleague letter was when it was first part of policy I think, but the decision actually came from a court case. A girl was being harassed to such an extreme degree it objectively limited her access to education based on sex. Title IX was …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/23 03:31 PM
1

I was thinking the same thing regarding evidence on cases for a bit, but I don't anymore after reading more into the "meta politics" of what an investigation is for OCR and what it means for Catherine Lhamon (head of OCR). When Lhamon was head a long time would do this thing where they would post a lost of schools under investigation as a wall of shame. This is insidious and ripe for abuse. They could simply put a school on investigation and hold it there forever if they didn't like them, even i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/23 03:21 PM
8

I would assume that they don't expect you to come with full proof in hand when you make an allegation. For men's cases, they do. That is based on my experience. I would actually generalize a bit further and say it might be any politically inconvenient case, or even all cases. I very much doubt it is limited to men's cases, I just know that they definitely do it with men's cases. This is part of the problem I want to fix with OCR. I think that if someone can show that discrimination is very likel…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/23 03:28 PM
52

It's not a women's university.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/23 02:54 AM
20

admit your initial position was wrong or misguided. Be specific please.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/23 12:57 AM
15

Just thought you could use a bit of introspection on the subject. Part of me making these posts is to put those criticisms out there and open my arguments to critics. Since it made you think that, then be a critic. It isn't helpful to me to say this and not elaborate. Where do you think I ered here? Is it in the primary arguments: Calling a school "woman focused" is discriminatory. There is a plausible issue of discrimination in the student regent position that, at face-value, warrants an invest…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/23 12:48 AM
21

Though I think it is worrying that you dismiss things that don't go your way. Can you elaborate on that in regards to this post? It is illegal for a coed university covered by Title IX to "focus" on a gender. It is declared to have such a focus as a matter of state law and we see that put in practice. The issue with them pursuing this is that it isn't something the school can change. This puts them in an unprecedented bind where a violation can't be fixed, and the only outcome OCR would have is …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/23 12:26 AM
8

Well this is heating up. OCR informed me of a massive investigation into Texas Woman's University. I announced it on twitter. I quoted some stuff their sports department's twitter account put out pointing out the hypocrisy of them celebrating Title IX. They blocked me, which now limits my ability to collect evidence for federal investigators. What I did was protected by the first amendment since I was criticizing policy and actions of public school funded by taxpayer dollars. Their actions were …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/23 04:24 PM
7

I was asked by a coworker to help trouble shoot a data handling issue in a project she was working on. I did a trouble shoot on the data issues like it was my own project so I could systematically narrow it down. I had never looked at this project before so couldn't make a guess, I had to use the same methods I use on my projects when I end up stumped where the issue is. Start from the beginning and rule out the issue at each step. I was accused of mansplaining. Told her I couldn't find the issu…
/r/MensRights11/02/23 04:27 PM
49

AFAIK rules for government employees regarding this stuff is either the same or stricter than private sector.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 06:42 PM
25

Wow that’s even worse than in the US! US aggregate data sure. In terms of individual universities, there are far worse examples in the US. For example Texas Women's University, a public coed school. They only allow men because Title IX requires it. They have not been compelled to take affirmative action in overcoming their history of single sex discrimination in admissions like men's colleges were when they went coed. Instead it is heralded as a core part of their identity and heritage. They ser…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/23 09:17 PM
10

A&M in college station..... Same Uni where I caught their Title IX coordinator issuing rulings she knew were false. Several reporters are working on breaking the story. Same Uni that has an engineering team "robotic engineering aggie females" that is inclusive and open to men according to them. Same Uni that ran a job fair and told men not to apply to go to it. They found the student org guilty of discrimination, then gave them an award for diversity and inclusion. This doesn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:42 PM
1

If this is the USA you can file a federal complaint. If you are under 18 you might need a parent to sign off, but worth looking into. Lmk and we can talk. DMs are open.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 12:41 AM
1

Not like the law makes much difference here in the USA. Lol. My heart goes out to you.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 04:06 AM
2

In the USA a college can not advertise or run a scholarship based on gender. What they do is make it seem that way so the "undesirables" don't apply. While this is also likely illegal, the office of civil rights doesn't do shit about it despite the SCOTUS ruling in Teamsters v USA. If you are in the USA, apply anyway. If denied file a complaint with the office of civil rights and post it to my sub.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 02:51 AM
-2

I love seeing stuff like this pinned as a comment. Thank you.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 12:14 AM
1

I told the probation officer I do not want Brock to rot away in prison. I did not say he does not deserve to be behind bars. The probation report says otherwise and they provided transcripts to the court. I care very little about some statement made after the fact when people aren't subject to oaths. It happened. Her saying he should get jail time after sentencing doesn't change that, or that it was a component of the recommendation. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2858997/Probation-offic…
/r/MensRights17/01/23 01:36 AM
1

They did not find someone else’s DNA in her panties. Another verifiably false statement. The appellants opening brief, page 51. Look up the transcripts they reference if you want. [Craig Lee] found a mixture of DNA from two individuals, with Ms. Doe as the major contributor, and “Brock Turner is excluded as a possible contributor to the minor DNA component.” do better.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 11:32 AM
1

Don't think I think what he did was okay. That's not the case, and it isn't the case for the author of the book. I'm just saying there are a lot of lies and falsehoods circulated as fact about this case. and she did not ask that he serve no time. May 3 2016. Between conviction and sentencing. The parole board interviewed Chanel to get her input. The official report quotes her saying: "I don't want him to feel like his life is over and I don't want him to rot away in jail; he doesn't deserve to b…
/r/MensRights16/01/23 09:44 AM
2

Short answer is because OCR doesn't enforce the rights of men so illegal programs are allowed.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 04:05 AM
3

i'm looking at the first example and i'm already lost. did brock turner invoke his "needs" as a defense? didn't he just plead not guilty? You should read "Collateral Damage." Most of what you heard about the case is a complete fiction. The book is titled as such because both Brock and the woman were collateral damage and an afterthought to people around them using this case to launch their careers. Justice didn't matter. Facts. There were no witnesses to the alleged crime. The woman was not unco…
/r/MensRights16/01/23 03:49 AM
2

My college doesn't offer much training or working opportunities for boys since the emails are literally labelled [FOR WOMEN] Apply anyway. Not allowing men is likely Title IX violation. OCR allows stuff like "women in stem astronomy class for women" or, in one case, calling an event "all female" as long as they technically allow men. This isn't aligned with rulings by SCOTUS but OCR doesn't care. They call it "encouraging women" not discrimination. So apply. If you are rejected then you have a s…
/r/MensRights15/01/23 03:52 PM
2

In my opinion, yes. The problem is, both the right wing and the left wing don't give a shit. And the left is literally the party of the man haters known as feminists. VAWA (violence against women act) which replaced violence against families act was written by Joe Biden. I am a mod of LWMA. You seem to be confusing "left wing" of our name with the American left. These are not the same. It is a space to discuss men's issues in context of left wing ideals. Most egalitarian civil rights activists a…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 09:15 PM
1

any unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, regardless of whether it is direct or indirect, or verbal or nonverbal In case anyone misses the gravity of this change let this sink in. If this passes the following are possible violations that can get you expelled. Asking someone in your class of they want to Netflix and chill after a few dates Doodling a penis in the margin of your notes. Those are the easy ones that everyone will jump to thinking of. There are some others I think people are missing.…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 07:05 PM
1

Title IX? Jury? Lol. I don't think you know how Title IX plays out in practice.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 06:33 PM
1

It is. But good luck getting OCR to enforce it. Absent an express statement of exclusion, you need to show that someone was denied because of their sex or race. The Dept. Of Ed. Office of Civil Rights (OCR) allows any and all dog whistles in obstinace to SCOTUS rulings. OCR literally ruled a university event calling itself "all female" was not discriminatory because men could technically apply to attend.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 06:28 PM
28

How a relationship is defined and carried out between two consenting adults is not anyone elses business to dictate or control. I don't know why anyone gives a fuck.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 06:27 PM
7

You could become an activist and engage in legal civic action like talking to politicians and people in your life. You might get some blowback, but nothing changes if people don't speak up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/22 04:09 PM
1

This is why the Supereme Court called discrimination invidious. It's an amazing word and I think it is perfect. The act of discrimination alone, no matter how well-intentioned, will always cause an intrinsic harm to society.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 01:41 AM
3

Ooo. Good call.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 02:05 PM
1

call you an incel, misogynist, alt right fascist, etc. I've been called worse by better. Activism gave me thick skin though. This stuff follows you around and people are more than happy to jump on old comments without context. Unless you are prepared to calmly and effectively respond, use a dedicated account here.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 11:22 AM
2

Excellent activist work. Keep at it!
/r/MensRights15/12/22 11:08 AM
7

That was a great article. There was one part though..... rant incoming. Lhamon inaugurated a policy of publicizing the names of all schools under investigation, some of which remained so for years. I wish I could scream at the top of my fucking lungs so people could hear me. I have not seen a single article that hits the mark when talking about this or why it happened. A lot of these people don't have the ground level insight into how the system works and completely fail at connecting the parts.…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 07:21 AM
21

That user is top notch for resources. Especially their website. They don't tend to get into much discussion on reddit outside their posts due to all the stuff they work on. I think they mainly monitor their email and are rather attentive if you drop them one via their website. That user is a lawyer who focuses on Title IX. Advice can be tricky since there are a lot of legal implications to a lawyer giving advice without knowing all the details and representing you. I talk to them from time to ti…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:15 AM
15

The situation was about another man who abused me and a few other guys and they laughed in our faces and mocked us. This is a hostile Title IX dept. Proceed with extreme caution, if at all, when dealing with them. I feel like they may take it the wrong way or escalate things My man. Let me tell you about Title IX and tribunals. There have been school cases were guys have been found guilty of assault because a third party witnessed something and reported it, all while the "victim" claimed there w…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:10 AM
22

The followig is absolutely not all the things you should do, and tbh I don't have a great answer or suggestion. What you can do, which would be useful if shit hits the fan is this If you have a keycard, use it to access a room it is required for before leaving to go home to log where you were. Use it again at the destination to establish a timeframe. Heck, reach out to IT and ask them about it to see how you can best do this and how long logs are kept. They might not give you an answer, but that…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 05:51 AM
3

Indeed. Part of my work is showing how bad things are. Shit like this isn't at all isolated and we need people speaking up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/22 02:16 AM
4

Was it A&M in college station or a different school?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/22 11:04 PM
12

This is a great comment, and it is good to try and maintain this kind of empathy and optimism in activism. Some critical questions to ask yourself. Did she issue a ruling that was materially false? Was she aware that this ruling was false? Jennifer Smith has a attorney bar-card for Texas, and when acting in an official capacity with authority mandated by federal law, has knowingly lied in her determinations on matters of program legality under Title IX and 34 CFR 106. This is not befitting of a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/22 10:43 PM
4

Help make it happen. Write a letter or email to the president of A&M. Copy some reporters. I'm willing to dox myself for such a story and provide an interview and statements. Also, will do.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 02:49 PM
2

Saved. I think this will be useful in some of the things I file with OCR.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/22 05:51 AM
1

I want to add to this that I think the biggest thing for me this year was a shift in my perspective on Title IX and the direction of my activism. While I still file to end discriminatory programs, a lot more effort is now dedicated to uncovering corruption due to just how much of it I am running into. I see it as the larger problem causing the one that my activism originally focused on. The big tamale is my recent post regarding Jennifer Smith, a Title IX coordinator at A&M that I caught issuing…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/22 05:31 AM
1

Omg I never got the tag as a ping. Nooooo. Ive had my head down hard-core working some stuff, the likes of which was posted recently. If I ever don't respond to you, absolutely drop a DM. Those for sure ping me. Idk why reddit didn't give me a notice. People can help simply be reaching out as a student and letting me know what school they go to. Sometimes a drafted complaint is scrapped because I lack an insider needed to cinch it together. Having contacts is huge. A student insider has been cri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/22 05:19 AM
3

Be bitter then. But please don't direct your bitterness at the community or those making progress. I encourage you to find a form of activism that is legal and motivates you so you have a productive outlet. Oh, I should also mention that Verizon was running a sexist program that included building infrastructure and funding specifically for women. Five schools were partnered. When OCR opened investigations the schools quickly terminated the partnerships and backed out. That was pretty significant…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 05:10 AM
5

Well for this case a number of the programs have been changed, albeit poorly. That wasn't really the point and major parts are still unfolding. I have something likes 70 other cases. By the time most conclude, the offending programs are either terminated or fixed to a reasonable degree. I have also nailed a publicly visible win against Strayer University's sexist operation of Hackbright which is still working on massive overhauls to branding and will be entering the monitoring (by OCR) phase soo…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 05:01 AM
3

if we don’t hire a lawyer Most of my work I do without legal representation. For this case I have serious skin in the game and tangible damages. Damn right I have lawyer. start suing people we’re worthless and unable to discuss issues? I have not filed a lawsuit. OCR complaints are civil rights complaints to an executive, not judicial entity. They control the federal money faucet to schools and have a lot of enforcement power. They are meant as a power lever for people who don't want court, want…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 04:52 AM
7

greater empowerment of Title IX kangaroo courts It is a point of my activism to provide a bit of redirection on the community pushing on Title IX reform. This is not a personal slight, since very few people have the perspective I am sharing, even other activists. The changes they are making are absolutely, not about empowering these kangaroos courts. As long as we keep harping on that, we provide an ineffectual response they planned for. The people out on the front lines know that schools do wha…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 02:27 AM
5

Thanks. Much appreciated.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 01:10 AM
8

Not for Title IX. The whole thing is a shitshow and even people who think they know how bad it is, really have no fucking clue. I am trying to provide a window into the fucking abyssal void that is the Title IX "system".
/r/MensRights14/12/22 12:41 AM
7

Denial by lack of response is my understanding. Basically I will need to take them to court to get it. They know they fucked up.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 12:36 AM
5

This went down for a sec because I used a method of linking pictures (direct uploads) that can cause issues for mod enforcement so the bot clapped it. I fixed it and I think the bot will allow it back in short order. Don't reee at the mods. ​ u/AnnArchist are you around to check that I fixed the links?
/r/MensRights14/12/22 12:30 AM
7

Editors kept killing it. The allegations are immense, the case is rather complex, and I am male so I am not worth their time to do the due diligence. I do have someone who is letting me write an opinion piece telling it though. Feel free to ping news agencies and tell them about it though. If one comes knocking, I'll consider it. Just another reason I need community help here.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 12:13 AM
7

I have have some theories on this, but I am staying silent on it for now. Let's just say that when I reported to SECO, the oversight board for all A&M schools (not just this one), that they never bothered getting back to me.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 12:07 AM
9

Isn't it a big felony/charge to lie to Federal investigators? Yes. Take your evidence and turn her in. I do not have information that she or anyone specific made this statement to them. Names were redacted in the FOIA. I presume that the office of general council did it, but I really don't know. I do know it was an official school memo. She won't be working for long, if she's in jail. Welcome to Title IX. Hold your surprise. Good fucking luck finding a prosecutor who will pursue this.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 12:05 AM
20

Thanks for that. It is, at times, very draining doing all of this, but moves like this one make it all worth it. This case is special to me, because it is what made me an activist. The tipping point on making this post was two-fold. First, it was clear I wasn't going to get further with my current methods since the school began stonewalling my attorney's FOIA requests. Second, the school attorney told me I don't have the right to harass university personnel..... when I was simply trying to ask m…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 11:13 PM
7

This raises a lot of questions regarding other cases. One that I am watching involved a woman suing them for pay disparity to her male counter parts. The argument in the case is extremely compelling. What piqued my interest is that it mentions she filed a complaint with the Title IX department at A&M and they didn't investigate. This seems to be a running theme. I am interested to know how official reports to the state look, since they have mandated reports regarding their Title IX affairs. Did …
/r/MensRights13/12/22 10:41 PM
1

The goddamned defeatist attitude here is becoming unbearable. What kind of activism are you engaged in? The defeatist attitude stems from keyboard warriors doing nothing. When people talk instead of getting active, nothing gets done. If you feel strongly about changing it, be an activist.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:58 AM
19

If the person you want to be with doesn't match on core principles, the relationship is fundamentally doomed. It's for the best.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:27 AM
1

using the general "you" here referring to anyone reading this comment Some of us are out here trying to make a serious difference and I went into it expecting some speed bumps in my work. I was shocked at how flagrant non enforcement is. I don't think people realize how corrupt it all is. Even if you think you know some of the bullshit, if you aren't on the front lines doing this stuff, I can promise you that it is far worse than you think. Example. MRAs: We know that Title IX tribunals are bias…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:05 PM
4

However, I feel that electing the only cis, white male president of this district sends the wrong message to our community — a message that is contrary to what we as a board have been trying to accomplish. This is a Title IX violation. Also likely a violation of various other Titles which are far stricter but more limited in scope. In case anyone wants to see why lack of enforcement by the office of civil rights (OCR) is such a big deal, this is an example. We don't get to this point where viola…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 05:41 PM
21

Retaliation is illegal, but common. It should be expected when dealing with Title IX and schools. Tread carefully if dealing with a school directly who has a position of power over you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 07:49 AM
11

There are other ways. You can report to OCR and when given the consent form sign that you don't give consent to reveal who you are. That said, OCR doesn't give a shit about men's cases and unless you file with the strength that Kursat does (the guy who filed the complaint in the post) you might not have much luck in a public resolution. Even absent a public resolution, getting an investigation often ends the discrimination. An investigation is much easier to get than a resolution, and it achieve…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 07:47 AM
21

There is really nothing stopping men from doing the same What is stopping them is the university itself. There is immense pressure from within the administration to keep discrimination going.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 07:43 AM
2

I share a good number of of my filings on my subreddit. There are some I don't share for legal reasons, and the fact that my attorney representing me for them would get annoyed. As for other avenues. Consistently denied by AG's. I even had an intake meeting with the FBI but they have not got back to me yet and it's been a while. I assume the are ghosting. I might one day publish a book. I keep very detailed records and running narratives for corruption so I can read through my records quickly an…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 06:21 AM
2

You don't understand. You can commit any crime you want if they won't prosecute. I have tried reporting it. Fucking ghosted or denied. I even talked with the FBI. Everyone is real interested until they find its a men's case. OCR is openly hostile to me now that I called them on it. They know nothing will happen to them. Example from just a few minutes ago because that is just how absurd this is now. https://www.reddit.com/r/MRA_TitleIX/comments/za8x3r/ocr_went_off_the_rails_and_was_openly_hostil…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 02:52 AM
2

I handed hard evidence of Texas A&M Title Iax coordinator Jennifer Smith issuing rulings she knew were false to the Deot of Ed. Office of Civil Rights (OCR) and they didn't even mention it in the case dismissal. It was the core of the case and the elephant in the room while reading the dismissal. My attorney has given me permission to state facts of my case on social media. Jennifer Smith denied me explicitly state rights when I filed Title IX complaints internally. She dismissed several cases a…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 01:02 AM
3

If they do fire you make sure you have a log of all your hours and their hours before you went on "normal hour strike." Then sue them. The world is getting tired of this. Just ask Johnny Depp's ex. Or OP could just go all in by submitting to EEOC. At least then you would have stronger protections. It's free and doesn't require an attorney. Many types of empmoyment discrimination lawsuits have to go through EEOC before a court can touch them. From the EEOC website: If you plan to file a lawsuit u…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:39 AM
2

OCR = Dept. Of Ed. Office of Civil Rights Mr. Pekgoz solicited signatures for a petition here, I think it was for this complaint. If you signed, you help make this happen. Some things to note. The process of hurdles in getting anything meaningful out of this is: Get a review by OCR (easy enough if you know how to file) Get an investigation, which is where we are at (hard, but Pekgoz knows his shit so he got one) Get a resolution (very hard since OCR helps cover this stuff up) Get a resolution th…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:11 AM
5

Want to get involved by helping to write Title IX complaints, or writing your own to stop the bullshit. It's easier to get started than you think. I tackle harder stuff most of the time, but you can file complaints against a single program. You don't need to even go to the school. It's free and doesn't require an attorney. It doesn't stop if people don't flex their rights.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 11:45 PM
28

Men get a clear message that we are privileged and shouldn't be there. OCR is fine with this. They call it "encouraging women" when they label an event "all female". They said that was okay for a program a I wrote a complaint about because technically men could have applied to attend the event. Dog whistles are ignored by OCR, even if they are as loud as a fog horn.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 11:41 PM
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights20/11/22 05:29 AM
2

Done
/r/MensRights20/11/22 05:29 AM
1

Darkeisha has nothing to prove. Anyone questioning her is only doing so because she is a woman and they don't know the first thing about who she is or what she has done. She's actually out there doing shit, and some keyboard warrior calling her a possible infiltrator is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 01:17 AM
11

Hey! I do similar stuff but don't file as many since I don't have a team, mainly solo operation with some tips from students. I wonder of there's an individual right of action If you arent the impacted party, and outside the school? Maybe, in a sense what you are complaining about is a funding violation since title IX says federal financial assistance can't be used for schools that discriminate based on sex. Idk if there has been a ruling on it. or if you're entirely dependent on the administrat…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 06:03 AM
9

She was a real egalitarian. This quote is lacking a lot of context. National Coalition For Men has even said she was a men's right activist, because she was. She advocated for people's rights as an attorney and as a judge, even for men. Famous example is when RBG beat the IRS while representing Mortiz before the Supreme Court in a sex discrimination case. Was a highly influential ruling she got for it. And even if it is a little off color, it is barely so. Given all the other amazing things she …
/r/MensRights02/11/22 04:11 AM
1

RBG made some big arguments and rulings for men during her time as an attorney and later, a judge. Like the famous Mortiz vs. IRS case where she represented a guy. One her friends said it was her favorite case. While she was a known feminist, if you read her rulings she made while sitting on SCOTUS, she was really good at being an egalitarian. You really need to contextualize her "feminist" label with the times of the industry she went though and that it is a very different kind of feminist than…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 04:03 AM
3

Not a lawyer, not an attorney, this isn't legal advice. You need to realize this isn't as simple as getting in trouble with the principal for cheating on an exam, or cussing at a teacher. You have been accused of a possible crime. You should talk to your parents and consider getting an attorney. When accused a possible crime: Rule 1. Shut the fuck up. Seriously. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. watch that video. Fucking do it. If you are in the US and a legal adult, I would be careful even talking to your p…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 04:57 PM
3

Your website makes it easy if you know the title of the case and date, but finding anywhere else is a nightmare without the case number for that exact reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/22 03:31 PM
4

If you could put the sedar case reference or something easily searchable on it, that would make it a lot more usable for people looking to read into it. Something small and faint so it isn't distracting since most won't use it, but I would like to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/22 03:24 PM
4

AFAIK there is a MVP for reproduction with no oversight body organizing it and an MVP for organized reproduction where genetic mates are chosen to prevent inbreeding with a genetic (but not biological) relative. Might be the source of two different numbers in your head. I remember reading something about it regarding establishing a space colony. The first reproductive colony in space would likely be organized reproduction with consent of people who choose to go since getting a colony of thousand…
/r/MensRights24/10/22 12:35 PM
19

For more info Feibleman’s written statement to the three-member hearing panel was heavily redacted, according to court records. The panel took no testimony. Members refused to ask questions of Feibleman or his accuser that Feibleman had repeatedly begged them to ask about evidence he’d submitted in his favor — hundreds of photos, videos, and a damning audio recording. And then the panel found Feibleman guilty. He was expelled and denied his diploma. This a good picture of what is at stake for th…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 04:36 PM
11

r/MRA_TitleIX for anything Title IX related. I do a lot of activism and post a good chunk of it there. There are a few ongoing sagas as I uncover corruption in civil rights enforcement.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 03:33 AM
5

Hard to forsee an end to it without one of the following: Courts bleeding the schools dry with massive awards to plaintiffs. Rooting out corruption at the Office of Civil Rights and getting them to enforce the civil rights of men in schools.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:54 AM
6

u/Title_IX_For_All is constantly tweeting updates to interesting court cases related to Title IX. Highly recommended following them @TitleIXforAll
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:50 AM
10

Talking about the US here. The "why" isn't some nebulous thing everyone pretends it is. Men have civil rights in education. But they aren't enforced. There are so many illegal programs that constantly tell men education doesn't prioritize them. I've caught a school pouring money into women's programs while culling men in admission. Two very different approaches to the problem they were trying to solve, raising on-time graduation rates. When it comes to enforcement, I've caught OCR going as far a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/22 03:23 AM
7

Want to run a piece on civil rights enforcement by the office of civil rights? I have a heap of pithy examples to demonstrate they don't enforce the civil rights of men in education.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/22 03:12 AM
2

Affirmative action programs (AAPs) are absolutely still running. University of Louisville runs one for women even though they are the majority of students and staff. AAPs are not at all uncommon. I would guess that AAPs aren't the major factor on this stat though.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:54 AM
1

Title IX is specific to the US. As far as MRAs doing work on education, there are a lot, but I don't really have much information on specific people in other countries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 12:27 AM
22

The telos of a knife is to cut, the telos of medicine is to heal, and the telos of a university is truth. Love this quote. Part of the issue in requiring DEI statements is that it doesn't send the message "this research is important." Instead it sends the message "this is required in your work." Not all research will advance DEI. On top of that, what if there is important research findings that work against whatever DEI narrative is vogue at the time? As the professor said the telos should be tr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/22 11:12 AM
3

If the post took less than 5 minutes, it is likely low effort. Reading a great article and sharing counts as time spent on the post imo. Make it useful. Does it have a lot of great facts? Paths to activism? Make it spark high quality discussion. Explain in the post why it is important and seed the conversation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/22 10:12 PM
8

You can always help in the following ways. Elevate my voice on Twitter. @MRA_TitleIX Connect me with students who are in American Uni and want to help. If you are in an American Uni and want to help, having an insider is huge for getting docs and evidence. Tag me on posts related to Title IX so I can chime in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/22 04:44 PM
27

So it's okay to force all male institutions into co-ed, but not all female? It has always depended on the type of institution. The regs state that if you meet xyz criteria you can't discriminate. Private undergraduate colleges are basically the only ones who can discriminate in admissions. They have to be strictly undergrad. No grad courses. No research with people holding top degrees for the field. Even then, there are some tricky tacky rules. Technically you can meet the definition of both a p…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 04:55 AM
28

They claim to care about men's health to delegitimize any movement about men's rights by saying "we're already doing this, you're just lying about us not doing anything!", while also knee-capping any possible attempts to put these words to the test. I've experienced this first hand. I'm told we have organizations like OCR and EEOC in America to enforce civil rights and if there is a problem, men need to speak up. Well I have done that and what I found is they work hard to keep you silenced. They…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/22 04:21 AM
1

Find the number of universities with a women's center. Now find the number with a men's center. This isn't even a contest. For a good case example, check my sub for the post I made regarding UT Austin. They wanted to improve on-time graduation rates. They poured money into targeted support for women. They hit the target for women, but left men in the dust. One faculty member cited backlash for trying to get support for men. Another blamed men as "late bloomers." Their solution was to cull men in…
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:12 AM
1

American school? This would be the basis of a Title IX complaint. If interested, let me know. If you are under 18 you will need a parent to file for you.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 01:24 PM
1

I hope he wins as well. I gave him my dossier of internal emails (hundreds of pages) showing they have been running Title ix cases off the books and issuing fake rulings to protect the faculty involved. Clear cut and obtained by FOIA. I even show that their office of general council lied to federal investigators to get a case dismissed. Again, backed up by FOIA and extensive documenting on my part. Imo it shows that the court can't rely on the statements A&M makes as they have been shown to swee…
/r/MensRights23/09/22 01:35 AM
6

I see the same thing with being victims of discrimination. The reality is that the executive agencies responsible for enforcing civil rights like EEOC and OCR simply wont do it (okay, technically it's the courts the are responsible for enforcing but these agencies are supposed to make enforcement accessible). My work highlights the failures of the system that result in men not being able to get justice. Men see this stuff happen, and when they do decide to risk it and make a fuss, it gets silenc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 12:44 AM
26

In short, reduced liability. The new regs make it so they can secure the expulsion with bias and the counter suit will be very hard. When you have no real process you have to follow, you can't be sued for not following it. When the process that does exist is super opaque to the accused, it can be nearly impossible to show they fucked up, since how it worked was legally hidden and obscured. If they don't respond, the media narrative turns into "college has flagrant disregard for rapes on campus" …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 08:58 PM
16

Consider asking titleixforall.com Great people, I know the main guy behind it. He is sharp and probably knows how to find the answer you seek. He's very busy so it might take him a bit to get back to you. I wouldn't at all be surprised if he knows of a court case or two that actually address this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 05:44 PM
29

Not just a loss of ability to cross examine, but a loss of ability to even see it. That is no exaggeration.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 05:42 PM
51

People consistently miss the most problematic part of doing this. This stuff is admissible in federal court even if the school violated rights the court couldn't. Stuff from the tribunals is frequently used when they go to real court. This is a way of backdooring evidence, statements, witnesses etc into the court proceedings without ever being required to show the defense all the evidence, gather it according to legal standards etc. Did the school and accuser coach statements and did the investi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 02:44 PM
1

A&M has been running Title IX cases off the books and issues fake rulings. They do this to avoid disciplining faculty involved. It protects them. It's what got me involved with Title IX activism. I am not surprised. I talked with Richard Lowerey and he has my full unredacted evidence folder? Including hundreds of pages of internal emails.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 12:47 AM
1

OP, what college? Please DM me. I'll do a Title IX compliance rundown of their violations so you can point to specifics at your school. Also, I need student allies to help gather evidence of violations to assist me in filing complaints.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 12:44 AM
3

These new rules aren't for criminal trials they are trials made by the college Except that they somewhat are rules for criminal trials. The tribunal is admissible in court. This is a pre-filter for court evidence that the accused can't challenge the bias of.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 12:28 AM
3

Because it later shows up in court. Despite the issues and lack of protections in Title ix tribunals, the evidence used is admissible in court, and the defense may never have a chance to view the whole story. It's a racket to stage biased evidence in court and deprive rights to all evidence there.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 12:04 AM
9

If you don't, file with eeoc. It's free and doesn't require an attorney.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 11:03 PM
1

That is a Title IX violation. There is a resolution to a case similar to this posted on OCR's website. In that case it was girls being lectured on dress codes. Consider asking your parent to file with OCR for you. It is free and doesn't require an attorney.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 10:48 PM
8

Document. Apply for an internal promotion. Get the denial. File with eeoc.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 10:45 PM
1

Another friend of mine was a dual citizen with USA and Mexico. Lived in a cartel town where his parents owned a humble chicken farm. He had a similar story where he got a lot of help, breaks, and scholarships along the road to graduation. He nearly failed out after coming back from summer at home. That summer was wracked with violence due to our governments "operation fast and furious" and it fucked him up bad. Those breaks and leniency made it so he could still escape the bullshit. That is real…
/r/MensRights19/09/22 05:22 PM
1

Do you really think they would stump for 'the coloreds' if there was no gains for them? Stump for black MEN in particular I don't think these groups give a fuck about black people. It's par for the course that people in power only pander to their issues instead of helping. They have long lacked any serious consideration in power. My personal take is this is a class issue. Poverty disproportionately impacts POC, and power represents high economic class interests first and foremost. Always has. Ti…
/r/MensRights19/09/22 05:03 PM
5

Thanks! Dr. Lowery is really sticking his neck out for what is right by filing a lawsuit. I wish him the best.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:24 PM
15

One way to step up your game if you are a university student is to reach out to me in a DM and tell me where you attend and ask how you can help. Getting active is what we need. Not keyboard warriors on Twitter and reddit. Real civil action is what gets change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/22 03:21 PM
19

From the court filing, as quoted in the linked article: The Texas A&M University System, along with nearly every university in the United States, discriminates on account of race and sex when hiring its faculty, by giving discriminatory preferences to female or non-Asian minorities at the expense of white and Asian men. This practice, popularly known as “affirmative action,” has led universities to hire and promote inferior faculty candidates over individuals with better scholarship, better cred…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 03:04 PM
2

Now consider this. Stuff from school Title IX tribunals is admissible in court. The school doesn't have to be fair under the proposed new regs. They removed the part where treating the accused and accuser differently and less favorably than the other is a violation. They also allow for an oral account of the evidence the school deems relevant. The accused is not entitled to see all evidence. It's a way of filtering evidence to produce bias in a way courts can't.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 01:21 PM

Be careful when talking about this that we don't go down into biological essentialism. Talking about stats or results in a peer reviewed paper is okay, but those papers (if good) leave room for the individual to be different. OP, you might also want to check out the discord. There is an academic text channel and the people there have huge repositories of papers. They will be able to help as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/22 01:50 PM
1

I already filed some complaints. https://www.reddit.com/r/MRA_TitleIX/comments/wwlr5w/title_ix_and_vi_complaint_filed_against_nine
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:27 PM
1

If in the USA: One option could be to file with eeoc if you want to go that route. I would file for unemployment. They will probably deny it, but if you do sue, you will want to be able to show you tried to limit damages. Similarly, document your job search and apply to jobs every week as if you were trying to meet the unemployment criteria.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:59 PM
9

from the linked page Title IX is the 1972 Congressional ban on sex discrimination in federally funded education which is now used to impose left wing political goals in schools. Initially a seemingly benign ban on sex discrimination, Title IX has become a feminist weapon of choice, first to spuriously claim an epidemic of campus sexual assault and then to punish men for this alleged conduct, without due process in campus kangaroo courts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/22 03:15 PM
9

It is an infuriating read. There is an investigative journalist working it for a while now. They have been stonewalled on FOIA requests and related document viewings. The cops even assaulted her at one point. Over 3 million views for some of her videos on YouTube. She has published a huge number of emails and docs from the case to prove her arguments, like Michelle Dauber talking to the DA about drafting (fabricating) student letters to give to the judge. Those emails indicate Dauber wrote the v…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 09:00 PM
7

Isn't it that various parties are lying and the media latches on to what they are told by their "reliable sources" that fits a narrative that sells the most ads. It's parties lying when they are supposed to be reliable. For example, the prosecutor lied multiple times and claimed they were all "typos" but never bothered to make a big statement or correct the media outlets. The words of the prosecutor are supposed to be reliable. This is one reason why they are not supposed to make extra judicial …
/r/MensRights27/08/22 08:37 PM
36

I'm reading "Collateral Damage" right now. It's a book on the Brock Turner case and holy shit does the media lie about these cases. I'm only half way through the book and I can no longer trust media to even state the facts of such cases. So much of what was reported was a flagrant lie. She wasn't unconscious, it wasn't behind a dumpster out of view. He didn't take photos of her. He didn't pull down her top. The list goes on, but it's still reported as fact even today. Even his attorney absolutel…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 06:26 PM
4

Yup. When I started filing complaints and really probing how this system worked, I was shocked at how much corruption there is. For example, Texas A&M running Title ix cases off the books and knowingly issuing fake rulings. Nailed them via FOIA. OCR wouldn't even acknowledge the issue after Lhamon allegedly interviened on it.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:44 AM
6

Has anyone challenged unequal custody assumption on 14th amendment grounds? Someone must have tried right?
/r/MensRights23/08/22 06:07 PM

I approved this post because OP made a decent comment that is likely to produce good discussion beyond "I hate this thing and you should too." The fact that OP is using it to engage in productive activism is even better! I'll keep am eye on discussion and if it devolves into outrage bullshit I'll kill the post or lock comments, but I think with OP's starter comment and the good community the sub has cultivated I suspect it will be fine. Please keep the discussion useful and productive like yall …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/22 03:19 PM
1

OP, I am not sure what you mean by "a list." Can you clarify what you want a list of in the post?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/22 03:09 PM
1

OP, here is what you need to do. Get a fucking lawyer. You have been accused of a crime. What you say during these events can be admitted into court. Use web.archive.org to archive school pages and policies. Archive, download, and document times for every policy possible. Read the school policy and 34 CFR 106 to get your bearings on your rights. Keep a log of where you have been and witnesses of you being at those places. Dates, times, names, places. I am not a lawyer. Go get one though. At the …
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:27 PM
2

I get out there and talk to congressional reps and candidates whenever I can to influence politics on the hill. Face time with them dispells myths and makes for greater impact. Someone sending an email might not vote based on the issue. Someone going out and talking in person likely will. Go do it.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:21 PM
1

You can follow me on Twitter or my sub dedicated to Title IX. r/MRA_TitleIX @MRA_TitleIX
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:19 PM
5

This is a Title IX and Title VI violation. If anyone goes here and can take the course / provide me documents I can file against it. Hijacked top comment to promote activism. Please forgive me.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:16 PM
3

Assuming your school is covered by Title IX, you can not run a club that is explicitly men-only through your school. Some exceptions exist but I don't think any apply here. Federal financial assistance is interpretated in the broadest sense possible. Even if you fund it 100% by members, the club can not be an official school club nor be listed / advertised using school funds (website, fliers on campus etc.) You can make the title and descriptions dog whistle that it is supposed to be men as long…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:05 PM
68

In America the ADA is nothing to fuck with. States agencies and their workers can even lose sovereign immunity for violating it. Penalties can be very nasty. Not a lawyer. Just passionate about civil rights and always trying to learn more while sharing my journey.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 02:30 PM
1

Rip. I was thinking of the watermark scholarship. I filed against that as part of my University of Delaware complaint (which included the Adobe one) I'll edit my comment.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 05:49 PM
1

Hey OP. I'd like to let you know that this post made a fucking difference. Thank you. Edit: was thinking of another scholarship that got wrapped up in the complaint against UDel running the Adobe scholarship. Still, the other scholarship was changed soon after my complaints were posted and filed. Very nice.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 01:37 PM
3

the university is presumably not permitted to do this as it would not be compliant. Correct. Even if it is entirely advertised and operated by an outside entity, if it uses the university facilities, it is a violatiom Maybe I'm missing something but I'm not seeing any paper trail regarding people deliberately covering anything up, here. No sweat. I like questions and transparency. Keep it coming. I have the dismissal from my internal complaint in the story. That was in sept 2020 (I got the docs …
/r/MensRights06/08/22 09:14 PM
2

The emails from inside the school aren't nessessary beyond one or two, which I have quoted in the story document. The others are somewhat arbitrary to the point. Stuff like setting up meetings and whatnot. The most important ones are quoted directly in the doc. The original of the schools internal emails is several hundred pages..... I didn't publish originals but I quoted the important ones. OCR has copies of originals. In the end they weren't required to end this course, they were simply requi…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:30 PM
6

Internal school emails (not shown since they dox a lot of people) show they didn't plan on ending it. They moved its department. This was in 2020. The ads for it in fall 2019 were what I complained about in 2020 The school formally found no violation per the dismissal of my internal complaint (this was in 2020) The school secretly found violations but lied in dismissal of my internal complaint. The school could not have found it to be a violation in 2019 since I was the one who complained in 202…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 04:27 PM
9

When I went after those FOIA emails I didn't expect this. I was looking into exactly what the school said and who said it. OCR redacted all the names, emails and office info from school emails (this is standard for their FOIAs afaik). I was a little pissed at first glance, but it wasn't unexpected. When I saw OCR coached them, I still had trouble believing it. Even now, if someone posted that claim without also dumping the emails I wouldn't believe them. I had to include the emails this time. No…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:16 PM
8

It's getting to the point where I'm actually worried how high this really goes. My attorney seemed to agree that there was political interference to get the original bulk of my complaint dismissed. He's been asking questions about it on calls with OCR and helping with some of the more obstinate FOIA respondents. Jose Ortiz once told me on the phone he was going back and forth with DC because they expected "high public visability" of the case but it shouldn't be much longer. Then the admin change…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:00 PM
15

Sorta right. As far as the "sundae" of this story goes, this is the cherry. You missed the ice cream. The part they didn't investigate is like 95% of the problem. This little thing they did look into is a bit of a nothing burger compared to what they didn't look into. The only reason this was investigated was I could cite precedent for doing so. You can see by the emails they never intended "go after" the school. OCR contacted the school and engineered a cover-up. This wasn't a real investigatio…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 01:52 PM
52

This has cost thousands to figure out, in both dollars and hours of my time. I have been intimidated, retaliated against, stonewalled, lied to, dismissed and otherwise messed with every step of the way. I have finally put together the important parts of this saga where I can now share the juicy part with everyone. Several representatives, including federal senate and congress have shown interest in what is going on. I have one on one meetings with congressional candidates to talk Title IX. I was…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:49 AM
2

I wish I was making this up. The Dept of Ed. Office of Civil Rights coached Texas A&M on how to get OCR's investigation and allegations dismissed. They literally told them that to make the case moot, A&M had to do xyz. They then worked with A&M until that was complete.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/22 10:49 PM
7

Absolutely. As far as the US goes, these things are only ever brought up to misdirect from addressing the blatent sexism. Boys had been doing just fine under the educational paradigm until sexism against them was introduced. When I was in undergrad the president addressed the incoming class. He said our year had the largest percentage of women in the schools history and "that must be why the grades are so high." The staff clapped. I will vigorously argue that a system that can produce such an ev…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/22 07:09 PM
1

No problem. If you have any other issues / questions let me know. I'm more than happy to assist.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:42 PM
18

While there are ways to improve the design of classes to better support boys, it is a bit of a misdirection from the issue. Any field that predominantly attacts boys also discriminates against them now. A boy who fits the stereotype of being "things" oriented and wants to go into stem must slog through programming that treats him as second class. If men go into fields dominated by women, there is no support, and certainly no one willing to address rampant sexism against them. The whole education…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/22 06:39 PM
1

To what? I gave links to the audio posted by a reputable attorney who covers these kinds of cases regularly. You can also get info on the case off Pacer using the case id, or the circuit and date of the case (8/3/2022).
/r/MensRights05/08/22 03:33 PM
5

In the US there are paths of action for individuals. Check out the sub with the same name as my user name to see the work I do. Student help is critical for success of my work. Others can help by tipping me off and writing representatives.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:26 PM
9

Anyone who is in a US university and wants to help end sex-based discrimination, please DM me. I need student activists working with me. I've already had several students anonymously help me by providing critical insider info. Doesn't matter if you are male, female, something in between or off the binary. Please reach out.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:22 PM
13

If anyone is in the US and currently attends university, and wants to help change things, drop me a DM. I need students involved. For example, one student reached out and dumped a huge file on me that ended up being the critically damning evidence I needed against systemic discrimination at a university. The details were not available to me, they were privileged and confidential. As a student he got his hands on them, and is clearly showed the administration were making decisions based on the de…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:20 PM
4

That link is old but can be used to trace more info on the case. If you look it up on Pacer the appeal in CA5 was heard 8/3/2022 by Judge Elrod. Idk of a more up-to-date link for case info that isn't hidden behind pay walls on Pacer.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 08:08 PM
8

driven by the fact Rice was stupid enough to admit the bias? This. It isn't so much that there is a lack of due process or fairness to accused. This is an entirely different issue in that Rice admitted to treating men and women differently when handling accusations against them. Other schools have unwritten bias processes but don't go around saying it. So when someone sues them, it's impossible to establish a pattern given all the layers of protections that shield details of past tribunals at th…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 07:59 PM
19

Men are 41% of students in higher ed, and the gender gap is worse than when Title IX was passed. Since 2012 over 99.8% of net student growth in college was female. What is your plan to address the under enrollment and under performance of men in higher education? Do you think "Women in STEM summer camp for girls" is reasonably interpreted to not include men? The office of civil rights thinks programs can be titled or described with words implying discrimination such as "all-female" or "orientati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/22 07:09 PM
10

Worse. The new changes don't even guarantee that the accused see all the evidence, or evidence at all. An oral account of the evidence the school deems relevant is enough. Schools can literally hide evidence or misrepresent it via an oral dictation and the accused has no recourse or way of knowing.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 05:08 PM
4

I suspect the courts are about to. I imagine lawyers are salivating at the thought of a class action after hearing this.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 04:56 PM
18

What is interesting is that the current regulations have dropped lawsuits substantially compared to the Obama-era regulations. The "new" regulations being proposed actually roll back to using some of the most controversial and highly litigated parts of the Obama-era regulations. They objectively don't give a fuck about fairness or due process. They want to force men into courts to get justice, since most can't afford it. It's also worth noting that they don't close the most used loophole for dis…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 04:42 PM
19

One instance doesn't substantiate systemic discrimination nor a pattern of bias. To establish bias, people often need to show a pattern. A single one-off event usually isn't enough. A fuckup that falls along gender lines isn't evidence of bias if it only happened once. With this statement the Judge is saying they don't think it was a one-time thing, and that based on the Dean's position and deposition statement, this can be considered a policy of the school. Granted, this is just in conversation…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 03:06 PM
22

Across the US, 76% of teaching faculty are women. That includes both grade school and higher ed.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:49 PM
2

Your post was determined to be low effort, and lacked any personal perspective or context for discussion. At LWMA, we want to encourage topical discussion on male advocacy, not simply outrage and emotional reaction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/22 04:11 PM
1

Your post was determined to be low effort, and lacked any personal perspective or context for discussion. At LWMA, we want to encourage topical discussion on male advocacy, not simply outrage and emotional reaction. Feel free to make these kinds of thoughts/observations in a comment to a post. The pinned "lounge" thread is a great place for that!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/22 03:19 PM
2

This could be an interesting discussion but please don't frame it as anti-feminism being the end goal. Equality and egalitarianism is the end goal. Maybe make a discussion on how to handle claims that we are misogynistic for critiquing feminism? If you include a couple news articles making those claims it could make for a good discussion post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/22 03:15 PM
2

Can't approve this. We aren't anti feminism. We can criticize feminism. We can be opposed to major components of the current approaches of feminism. But we are not anti feminism. Careful with broad generalizations about what "we" are. If you need one, we are anti-misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/22 03:11 PM
4

This is in response to this post, which the mods admins didn't think was advocating for violence or gender based discrimination. Ftfy. It was reddit admins, which are paid by the site. Mods only run subs and are unpaid internet janitors who are passionate about their communities. The fact that admins allowed this is way more significant than a mod allowing it since admins outrank mods.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/22 01:10 AM

For context, a version of this with a mermaid was posted to another sub and advocated for killing men. Reddit admins said it wasn't a violation of reddit's content policy. LWMA absolutely does not condone violence of any kind. This post is a statement regarding content policy on the site. Don't be that person who is daft enough to get confused on what this post is actually saying. I removed the post. I thought another mod approved it. It was automod, so I am taking it down. Sorry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/22 01:03 AM
1

I am a woman dealing with a false accusation against me but I am completely for having transparency and fairness across all genders. Absolutely. My activism is focused on helping men because of the issues men are having in school hits close to home for me. Activism is tiring and having that motivation is critical to not burning out. That said, everyone should be aware of their Title IX rights and I am completely willing to help people that aren't men. When men typically see Title ix, they don't …
/r/MensRights27/07/22 04:03 PM
3

Are you in the USA? Want to file a Title ix complaint? I can point you to some tools for doing it. It is free and doesn't require an attorney. If you are under 18 you will need a parent signature. Not a lawyer.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 07:55 PM
1

Maybe. I'm not skilled enough to tackle that. I am looped in with NCFM legal's emails and I let them know. They seemed interested and mentioned some similar issues, mainly the APA. I think that shipped sailed a long time ago though. The law prohibiting discrimination based on sex won't put down a definition of sex. OCR also thinks labeling an event "all-female" is not discriminatory if anyone can attend, but having bathrooms labeled "men" and "women" is discrimination. A coed school can't go and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/22 02:49 PM
2

If any of them go to college and want to get involved with enforcing mens rights, let me know. I need people in college helping my activism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/22 03:17 PM
2

There are ways of handling this. DM me if interested. Filing a complaint with OCR is free and doesn't require an attorney. It is easier than you think. We can work together to make a filing if you want.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/22 04:38 PM
1

Oh hell yea. This is my jam.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/22 04:37 PM
5

Against OCR? Probably the DOJ or OAG. Good luck with that though. They don't have time to take everything so they triage what comes in. Mens complaints will not get touched in my experience. You can also write to your congressional or senate reps about the problem with OCR changing the CPM. You can also tell them how you want them to vote on the new title ix regulations and what parts matter the most to you. People need to file complaints to OCR against their schools. Similar to what I do. But w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/22 05:51 PM
5

I'm honestly surprised people aren't up in arms. This is what metoo was partly about. People sharing and establishing patterns of abuse. Not only does ocr not care, they made it a reason to dismiss. Now if someone files and gets a biased attorney at ocr who dismisses, they can't appeal, and they fuck over everyone who writes complainants after. It don't understand why no one is talking about this.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 02:34 AM
9

I agree, but I don't think this account name would be well received. I'll let someone else spread the word to those types of communities. Consider this, ocr could dismiss a pattern of sexual assault claims against a coach under this if they failed to investigate the first one well enough. Because you can't appeal the decision, no matter how fucked up it is, it sticks. This then fucks over everyone who comes after you because it makes it harder to not be viewed as a pattern complaint. You would t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/22 02:21 AM
6

Done!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/22 11:43 PM
6

I am not sure how to interpret this comment since I am not super familiar with the APA. Feel free to educate me. There are a number of other major changes, and no public commentary was allowed. I don't see any indication that the changes were given the 30 day delay as required by law. I am not very familiar with this area of law though. I would consider the changes to be a major alteration of function for the agency's primary purpose. Why would someone spend 10's of thousands going to a court of…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 08:25 PM
24

I guess they got tired of Mark Perry and I filing appeals to bullshit rulings. For example, a few minutes ago OCR dismissed a case against TSU running a women-only scholarship and internship program. Apparently running advertising for it during an event in their stadium doesn't count because the video was hosted on a third-party website..... the website of the company organizing the scholarship. Or when they called an "all-female" event non-discriminatory because technically anyone could have ap…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 05:45 PM
3

Ask him if you can. Give it a go.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/22 10:25 PM
14

I'm on Twitter. Same handle as here. My stuff is a bit more esoteric. As someone else mentioned, thetinmen has a lot of good stuff for sharing on social media, especially imaged based ones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/22 08:00 PM
3

If you go to UCF and want to help with a discrimination complaint let me know. Need a student ally to get this one to work. Been working on a draft and I think it needs some help from a student to be a strong complaint. It could survive if the person at OCR isn't a shitter, but that's a gamble. A student would help take this over the finish line. Drop me a DM.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/22 01:48 PM
6

scholarships for girls only is discrimination. The fucked up thing is that's not even nessessarily true from the legal side of Title ix. Any scholarship held in trusts and stuff like that can be single sex. That's why most are memorial funds. There is also nothing against single sex scholarships that are not advertised (or administered etc) by the recipeint. I had a case dismissed recently because the scholarship changed the sexist language to be inclusive after spending thousands on advertising…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:16 PM
7

As a result, the Department of Education is investigating and shuttering not just women’s scholarships and awards at universities but leadership programs and even gym hours reserved for women as well. These programs discriminate against men according to Title IX. Like so many laws aimed at helping a particular group, there are unintended side effects of Title IX. This is how people actually think about Title ix. They see protecting men as an unintended outcome of title ix. They see it as a probl…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:11 PM
2

Being told not to attend a job fair, or that i can't attend a class / team etc at the school because of my sex feels a lot like oppression when men are a minority at schools across the nation. I'd go harder and explain some more extreme bullshit I've seen but since there is litigation pending my attorney would likely not approve.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:49 PM
1

Interesting article that does well breaking down some of the major issues in sports due to Title IX. It is also worth noting that there are many schools that are flagrantly non compliant. Texas Woman's University has no mens sports. It is a public coed school. Schools with a similar number of men support 5 or more teams for men.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:57 PM
2

They aren't scratching their heads. OCR nor the dept of education has commented on the problem. They are aware and don't care. Either it is complete apathy or an intended outcome.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:57 PM
20

Ask A&M. There was a court case in 2020 regarding A&M finding a guy guilty in a Title IX tribunal. The guy had nearly twice the BAC of his accuser. His complaint of assault wasn't considered in the hearings because the school never officially filed it.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:41 PM
2

I'm still working on it. Been a bit busier than normal and I had a couple time sensitive items related to my activism roll in that took priority to this. I do have a couple complaints drafted. They will all be going out at once. Still have a few more to do. Some of the complaints include other things as well, so it isn't a complete copy paste on this as I expected.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:37 PM
4

OCR dismisses a case of mine on 108(s) grounds which means it is moot and can't be appealed. It was based on a lie the school told the federal investigator. I can't appeal and the complaint about the lie is related to a dismissed case so it can't be filed as a new complaint. OCR is willingly allowing schools to lie to them to get investigations dismissed. Can't write a complaint. Can't write an appeal. OCR knows a crime may have been committed and chooses to sit on their hands. I have the ear of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/22 04:59 PM
2

Awesome work. We need more people like you. Do you have a copy or link to what you originally submitted? Seeing what has been successful helps others follow your lead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/22 04:33 PM
36

Maybe I am remembering wrong, but didn't boko harem go after the girls school specifically because the media would report on it? I've been thinking on where some of this comes from. I suspect it is rooted in archaic thinking that men have full agency over what happens to them and women don't. Men deserve it, but women are just caught in the system they can't control. It's like people can't fathom that men can be in powerless positions where they need help. I think most people would agree that an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/22 04:31 PM
9

I had to register for the draft. I'm on call for this job against my will.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:40 PM
3

is there a sweet payout? Unlikely. I don't get any money for what I do. Not from schools or agencies anyway, someone is donating $5 a month to my work which is super kind and helps with my legal fund. In terms of suing, you would have to find an attorney to take the case. You would probably need a bit more skin in the game to be taken seriously. But wtf do I know? Not a lawyer or attorney and have never been involved in a court case. This opinion is only based on me dealing with potentially taki…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 04:25 PM
3

On monday, check the subreddit with the same name as my username. I should have a couple posts up by then regarding this. I found a couple schools and someone who wants to remain anon helped get some evidence archived yesterday. Should have some complaints out by Monday. I'll tag you and OP in the comments so you are aware when I post it.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:32 PM
5

The scholarship is objectively discriminatory. Legal? Perhaps. Ethical? No. The gender gap in education is worse than when Title IX passed. But with the genders flipped. 2% of gender based scholarships are for men. Civil rights laws require discrimination to be evenhanded when allowed in an exception. Only caring about diversity when it is women while women are 60% of college students is not evenhanded. So while exceptions might exist, they often now fail the evenhanded requirement. So a school …
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:34 PM
84

Not a lawyer. But I stayed at holiday in express once and I file these kinds of complaints for fun. This not legal advice, it is simply my understanding of how things work as a point of discussion. Sexist scholarships are generally legal. They become illegal if federal funds were used in them. They become illegal if a school mentions them, advertises them, provisions them, handles applications etc. There are some exceptions but I don't think any apply here. If you find a school that does anythin…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:27 PM
12

Other people aren't responsible for making your bigotry comfortable to you. Go inconvenience yourself, not the people you stereotype.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:20 PM
34

Like others have said, there is an element of bias for sure. For some, that is all there is to it. I think it is generally a little more complicated than that. We need to look at it from the pro-choice and from the pro-life perspectives. I'm going to make some generalizations about those perspectives. I'm going to use gendered pronouns as a proxy for biological sex, not gender identity, to keep things simple. Pro-choice perspective is that women have the right to choose what to do with their bod…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/22 04:17 PM
12

In the past 50 years, every president has been male, almost every Supreme Court justice has been male, and the overwhelming majority of congress has been male. And you think feminists have been dominating our government. .... do you think all feminists are women and all women are feminists? If feminists actually dominated the government, the world would be a very different place. Like having parity in educational outcomes, life expectancy, refuge shelters proportional to need, parity in dirty jo…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:18 PM
3

then they can handle the civil suit going forward. Lol. Good luck with that. This whole thing is designed to introduce bias and make it impossible to hold schools accountable. I've literally had a school refuse to tell me my case manager's name on FERPA grounds. This was over me complaining about discrimination, it wasn't even a sexual harassment issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/22 09:03 PM
7

Worth noting that material and statements from the Title IX case at the school can be used in criminal court. The process at schools is basically an informal criminal investigation without any real legal protections or rails needed to produce a fair investigation. This then carries over into criminal court and severely taints all the witnesses and others involved with bias.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/22 08:48 PM
7

EVIDENCE: Accused students don't even have a right to all the evidence under these rules. The investigator can give an oral description of the relevant evidence. FREE SPEECH. There is a massive issue with the way sexual harassment will be redefined. It goes against a SCOTUS ruling and limits free speech. Verbal sexual harassment used to be either quid pro quo or severe and persistent. If it was quid pro quo, it need only happen once. For severe and persistent, a single instance would not make a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/22 06:14 PM
1

If this is in the US, the person who got sidelined likely has a valid eeoc complaint. It is easier to file than you think. It is free and doesn't require and attorney.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 04:24 PM
5

I am not responsible for quelling the fears that arise out of others sexist perceptions of me. They are responsible for their sexism. Not me.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 04:58 PM
-8

Nice. Lots of pithy lines in here. Well done.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 04:52 PM
1

Make it like employment law. Let them kick people out with little to no basis and let them handle the entire show. BUT add significant legal penalties and damage multipliers when the school fucks up so the harmed party can get attorneys to cover the case on contingency. Make it work in context of capitalism. Make good decisions aligned with the courts a financially incentivised outcome.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:54 PM
3

In the US the big one right now is recruiting from specific schools or clubs that have the demographic the company wants. The company acts like there is no bias and that they are just working with the applications they are given. Now companies are doing this thing where they fund the schooling for the top 50% in some coding bootcamps and hire the person when they graduate. Those bootcamps discriminate based on sex. It's companies training and hiring new employees based entirely on their apparent…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:43 PM
30

Fair hearings isn't what is special here. Courts already ruled elements of due process must exist so the idea that there is some element of fairness was established for a while. What is special is that the promises for fair hearings count as contract under state law. This gives a lot of financial remedy that otherwise didn't exist. This opens all sorts of tort liability under contract law for schools that fuck around. I think Maine is the only other state to have ruled on this. This might be the…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 02:32 AM
1

I appreciate it, but I don't think I'm on his level. I'm just really passionate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/22 11:47 PM
5

Thanks! Kind words from the community are critical to keeping me sane. I do it so other behind me don't have to deal with this shit, and if they do, they know they have ways of fixing it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/22 04:09 AM
3

Painting us nutjobs is a way to enforce the status quo. When they first get started in making changes, no civil rights movement is ever met with open arms by the government and oligarchs that control media. The government doesn't give hugs to high impact activists of a new civil rights movement. They actually have a track record of killing them, jailing them, smearing them, etc. It's a theme that has spanned the rise and fall of nations. When it comes to individuals, I haven't received much hate…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/22 04:16 PM
15

Newly appointed internet janitor mod here. I want to introduce myself in case anyone isn't already familiar with me. I have been around the MRM most of my life, and I currently focus a heavy amount of activism into Title IX, an American civil rights law banning discrimination in educational programs that take federal financial assistance. I try to connect people with resources for it and let them know there are avenues for flexing their Title IX rights that cost nothing but time. I have filed ov…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/22 12:44 PM
33

That assignment might be a first amendment, 14th amendment, and title ix violation if was a US public grade school.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/22 01:39 PM
1

From 2012 to 2020 men were 0.12% of the gain in total students attending 4 year colleges. I don't have the recent data but it is likely worse. Source: nces ipeds database. Basically the number of men attending college has stagnated and is now dropping. The number of women continues to grow.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 11:27 PM
2

Imo most interesting part of the opinion is that they allowed violation of process to be considered breach of contract. This allows suits for promissary estoppel (which is claimed in this case) and other related contract issues. It's based on state law, but other states may follow. I have a meeting with my attorney to discuss. I'm not party to this case. I'm wondering if this applies only to sexual assault or would apply to any SAP in the Title IX department. The opinion was specific to sexual a…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 04:58 PM
2

I think things might be changing. I really do. I have a reporter interested in my story. For a major TV news network. DOJ released modified guidelines on responding sexual assault and domestic violence. It specifically addresses considering bias in interpreting who is the victim and who is the perp based on gender. This is a big deal. The fact sheet linked on the page I link below, has some interesting facts. I don't know if this is actually doing what I think it is, but the timing and everythin…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 04:12 PM
2

This applies if going to almost any US school: If you are going to college you should get familiar with how Title ix works so you don't get fucked over. Know that you are not required to file complaints at the school (which can have conflicts of interest imo) and you can instead file federally. Filing federally with OCR is free and doesn't require an attorney, although you should always consider if you need representation. Feel free to hang around my sub and get familiar with Title IX. I only re…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 02:11 AM
7

My attorney and a journalist have them. I think I'm fine. I'm covered. Nothing is going to stop this freight train.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:11 AM
9

It doesn't change because victims don't have many avenues as a result of Title ix being a funding reg. We need it to be a real right. That would allow more substantial action for victims.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 04:58 PM
18

A&M was a lightning rod during MeToo and even had Title IX policy reform as a result. I think much of what I saw is a result of that. They want to paint an image of caring about MeToo stuff to the point that they don't care about truth. As was seen in the case I shared. I'm so fucking fed up with them. I will pursue this as long as I still have a method of doing so.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 04:44 PM
32

Thanks. Only took several hundred hours, several grand in attorney fees, and 2 years. Totally reasonable things to get an internal Title IX complaint to be taken seriously. /s The school even had (has? Idk) a women in engineering program that autoenrolled all female engineers. How can the system be so fucked that I can't get an official "yes that is a violation" at any step? They still advertise some stuff as being focused on helping female students. I can't even believe it, go poke around yours…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 04:31 PM
35

This case took a voluntary dismissal without prejudice. Aka they gave up and withdrew but might be able to file again. I reached out and dropped my evidence folder to his legal team. There are several other court cases of men v texas A&M that show a similar pattern.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 04:12 PM
168

My identity will be revealed in the article. I don't know exactly what that will mean going forward but I can't stay silent knowing this is happening to others at this school. I couldn't walk away just to protect my identity knowing I could make a difference here. I have to move to the next level of my activism and I won't be able to remain anonymous doing that. Whatever I face as a result is lesser to what this single victim endured. On I go. Across the threshold and into the breach. For him an…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 04:01 PM
2

Personally, I would file a federal Title IX complaint if i was in your shoes. It sounds like the dean threatened you and made you feel unsafe to take full advantage of academic benefits based on your sex without evidence of any wrongdoing. It sounds like he issued an informal title ix judgement without proper process. I'm not you though, I don't have all the facts, I'm not a lawyer, and this isn't legal advice. I'm just saying is you have rights and you can assert them federally if you think the…
/r/MensRights20/05/22 10:55 AM
2

You have Title IX rights. Many of those rights can be seen in 34 CFR 106 (Google the e-version). You can file federal Title IX complaints for free if you feel your rights were violated by the school. Doesn't even require an attorney I run a sub where you can check out some complaints I have filed. Feel free to post about it there if you do file a complaint. If you ever want to tip me off to bullshit at your school, I would love a DM.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 10:47 AM
1

There is clear bias and discrimination at every level of the education system. Boys get marked by teachers significantly less for the same work as girls, and with the move to coursework over exams this is having the obvious results. The graduation rates in University is nearly 2:1 ratio Female to Male. The politicians response? #girlswhocode #womeninstem. Nobody is even talking about it. It worse than you think. Around 2012 the acceptance rate for men began tanking, despite number of application…
/r/MensRights20/05/22 10:25 AM
1

You have Title IX rights. You can file complaints for free with federal OCR. It does not require an attorney. Given your case you might want one though, but I get that costs are a real issue sometimes. You can often get a free consult with an attorney if you reach out. It is pretty common. The Title IX regs that OCR enforces are 34 CFR 106. There is a good e-version if you search on Google and scroll down a link or two. If the school violated that while handling your case, oh boy. Download a cop…
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:52 AM
1

u/MRA_TitleIX to tag me. The full link doesn't work because.... reasons unknown. Type exactly as seen and it auto links + pings me
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:43 AM
6

Let me introduce myself. I am an Title IX activist after the shit I went through. My work has produced several federal investigations which are ongoing. I recently scored a win against Hackbright. My university had women only job fairs, women only classes, women only teams etc. The job fairs I could attend were flagrantly bias. Men got shuffled along like swine handing in resumes. Women got the red carpet and were pulled aside to chat. If you are in the US and want to know more about Title IX an…
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:32 AM
2

It's still a point worth noting. There is an element that goes beyond the funding rules (think Title ix + some hoops) that schools often miss. If a state runs the school, then the 14th Amendment applies. The moment they classify people by sex they need a justification that survives intermediate scrutiny (it might be strict, I forget which). Thats for the decision making process. A far stricter standard called "exceedingly persuasive justification" is applied to the outcome. The choice to look is…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 08:15 PM
16

They are also more likely to graduate on time, or at all. Assuming all other factors equal, their cost barrier is lower.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 01:04 PM
27

Man, women 10x more likely to get scholarships Not true. This is only data on gendered scholarships. It doesn't include overall scholarships. In general, women have a 7 point lead on getting federal aid, and a 2 point lead on other aid. Schools get away with this if the "overall effect" of their scholarships is balanced. This was good data, bad journalism.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 01:01 PM
13

Report assault to the police. You have witnesses and if you act fast, store cameras.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:28 PM
34

In US law FGM is banned. Even for beliefs that it is tradition or religious etc. MGM has no ban. Routine MGM is.... routinely done without a medical need.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 04:01 PM
24

Jacking top comment. All top comments as of writing me writing this have missed the mark. The gap doesn't actually exist the way they claim it does. It is a reporting method problem. Data is collected from hospitals based on the hospitals classification. It should read "women are more likely to go to a hospital after a failed suicide and more likely to have it labeled as such" No one counts the passive suicide attempts. No one counts the guy who put the gun to his head but chose not to pull the …
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:57 PM
7

~13% of the total work days in a year can be take off with this. Yikes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/22 12:23 AM
5

It wasn't an attack on you, it was regarding how we still have to phrase things in a way where in discussing our own issues we still have to give service to women. We often find it nessessary to say "women have issues but men do too" even though we should only have to say "men are having some big fucking problems" I do the exact same thing when talking to people outside the MRM. It's a good example, that when reflected on, demonstrates the need. We can't even get people to listen to mens issues …
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:16 PM
5

I filed _six_ months ago against five schools partnering with Verizon to offer a women-only scholarship and internship program. OCR's goal on this was to drag it out so they didn't have to stop it from going forward. They first tried to kick it to federal aid, which made no sense because it isn't a federal scholarship nor federal student loan. The issue at hand is explicitly covered in the Dept. of Ed. funding rules, and they know that it is within the jurisdiction of OCR. Eventually, they caved…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/22 01:55 PM
0

Basic Premises of Men's Rights First two points are about women and not men. The fact that you did this is why we need men's rights. Even when talking about it here, you still put women's issues first. Like every talking head these days.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:41 PM
2

https://www.iwf.org/2022/01/14/ninth-circuit-allows-accused-male-student-to-sue-ucla-for-sex-discrimination/ Courts are turning the tide and allowing civil penalties, maybe, kind of. If schools are not accountable, the abuse will continue. This case is a good thing.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:35 PM
5

Was it a school in the US?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:19 AM
6

I'm not sure what it would take. I suspect that the best way to get things to change is going to be men taking schools to court. We need to stop with settlements behind closed doors. We need cases that scare the shit out of the bias staff. We need men pushing fraud charges for staff lying to the feds (like I do in a couple of my current cases). Let's just say I am doing what I preach, but for the time being can't talk about it, at all. I have legal representation that wouldn't be very happy if I…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:54 PM
2

It will either take the school courts being abolished or them being placed under the judicial with real lawyers before this begins to resolve. Until then everyone is just turning the fan while the executive branch sprays shit into it. It's going to be shit-fan blowing the political wind of the times until it is under the judicial branch. Everyone needs to realize that even if this bullshit they want to pass is later repealed, the problem that allows it to happen will continue to exist.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 10:57 PM
8

1-2 days of personal time per month is reasonable if given to everyone. When a legitimate need exists and the solution can be reasonably accomplished without discrimination, a discriminatory solution is not allowed in US law. Like when Oklahoma tried to raise the drinking age of men from 18 to 21 to improve road safety. Courts struck it down because they could accomplish to goal by raising the drinking age to 21 for everyone. The discrimination was only arbitrarily related to accomplishing the g…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:59 PM
5

I need help keeping a case from being dismissed. If you or anyone you know went to Texas Southern University in 2021, let me know. Preferably fall. I need 10 mins of their time to check if an email was sent out about a program. If they are a woman that is better, since this may have been sent out based on gender. The school is partnering with Verizon to run a women only scholarship with a guaranteed internship at the end. Two schools that advertised it using university resources are already unde…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/22 02:25 PM
1

Interesting. Do you have proof that men can take these classes? If so feel free to let OCR know and reference case 02-22-2155 when emailing [email protected] If you would like to remain anon, you can always send me the proof and I can update OCR. If they share the same sports teams, the same classes, same departments, same instructors, same rooms, same board of trustees, and Columbia has 50% control over faculty appointment at Barnard, they are not administratively separate (in my opinion).
/r/MensRights08/05/22 08:48 PM
6

You're not a "person" until you're 18. Would probably be the argument. The Supreme Court already killed this argument specifically. The 14th ammendment applies to children in Plyler v. Doe in 1982, even if they are not citizens or are illegals. Specifically, Justice Powell noted the uniqueness of this particular case. He highlighted that as long as this law stands a group of children is being denied access to education, not due to actions of their own, but because of a violation of the law by th…
/r/MensRights05/05/22 05:14 PM
5

Within the US I wonder if anyone has tried to use 14th amendment to challenge instances where states are sponsoring the hospitals performing the mutilation. Edit: Looks like some people have talked about it. The 14th absolutely applies to children, ruled a couple times by SCOTUS. Very well supported. States banning FGM and not MGM might be in violation of the 14th's EPC. This paper discusses the legal history a bit. I will be using this as a platform for launching some complaints to test the wat…
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:54 PM
5

I file federal complaints. My gloves are off. I'm not asking for change anymore. I'm demanding it.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:59 PM
2

The richer you are the more the laws are harsher on you. I'm dying of laughter. I can't believe you are serious. First, let's talk about disposable income. The income you don't need to live. Rich people pay a small fraction of their disposable income for these things compared to normal people. Impact is way less. Normal people cut into nessessary income to make it happen, which turns into oppression. Rich people using disposable income is an inconvenience and it is impossible to think of them as…
/r/MensRights05/05/22 01:19 PM
3

But they are still public servants and representatives. Their decisions affect those who do not take part in them, listening to their reasoning and how they arrived to those decisions is something that would make things clearer to everyone outside that room. We already get that when they are ready to publish them. We are not entitled to drafts and the idea of publishing drafts is very dangerous. There are likely to be mistakes, missteps etc. These documents are not ready for public digestion. Th…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:32 PM
1

UT Austin is one of the worst offenders. In 2012 they started their initiative to increase on-time graduation rates to 70%. To do this they culled men in admission, and pushed more support for programs that help women. Women hit 70% on-time graduation, men stagnated at 56%. The school terminated the initiative. One professor faced backlash for suggesting men needed targeted support. One professor even blamed men as "late bloomers." The school ultimately said the reason they didn't do anything fo…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 02:29 PM
2

Men are disappearing from education. In 40 to 120 years the current trend has men disappear entirely from 4-year college. This will be very destabilizing to the social fabric and long term success if nations. Any changes are going to take at least 10 to 20 years to take effect. We will see men become less than 1/3 of college students before this turns around, if it does at all. It might not be a pressing issue for most individuals, but as a country, this is a calamity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/22 12:58 PM
101

This is fucked. States are going to have a patchwork of legality. Only the poor won't be able to get abortions. This is another form of class warfare and will disproportionately impact poor people. Crime will go back up again as well; roe v wade is directly responsible for massive drops in crime. The prison industry will get more bodies in 18 years. It will be used as an excuse to give police more tanks as crime goes up. The war on drugs will ratchet up again. A lot of communities are going to b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/22 12:40 PM
13

The 14th is higher than the state constitution. You can and should write to the feds about it. As it might be a violation of federal law, the feds can possibly force change even if the state doesn't want to. Classifying people based on sex as a state action is not a simple thing to be done lightly, even in recommendations. The simple act of even wanting to look at it from that perspective must be justified. Take a look at the legal history of the 14th ammendments equal protection clause.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:41 PM
17

Title IX only applies to education, so probably not that. It might be a violation of the 14th Ammendment's equal protection clause. I'd consider demanding the state's "exceedingly persuasive justification" for discrimination on the basis of sex in writing and take it from there. The need for a justification is created the moment the state attempts to classify people based on sex. It can not be created in response to litigation. I assume u/pvtshoebox is talking about this. Consider writing to you…
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:16 PM
4

No one is willing to recognize the violation of your civil rights. People have this oppression Olympics where they think as long as you aren't the most oppressed, your civil rights are optional.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 03:30 PM
15

even being a fucking mercenary committing war crimes for paycheck is still way more honorable then getting fucked by some dude and getting paid shit for it Couldn't disagree more strongly. War criminals are more honorable than a prostitute? Really? You have to be trolling. you're not risking your life by being a prostitute, soldier does risk his life. Prostitution is pretty dangerous in most places because it is illegal and doesn't have needed safeguards. Risking your life for the government doe…
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:05 PM
1

Men are indeed a minority as students in higher education across the US. Men represent about 42% of all students in undergrad. Men were also 0.12% of net students added between 2012 and 2020 at 4 year degree granting schools. The acceptance rate for a man's application is 93% that of a woman (continues to worsen). The school admissions process has disparate impact on men as a minority class across the US. At this school, men are the minority as well. In general I do not advocate for gender-based…
/r/MensRights01/05/22 01:50 AM
4

The trend in admissions at some schools paints a dire picture showing the time to act was yesterday. At UT Austin, if the rate from the last 20 years continues, they will admit 0 men in less than 100 years. That is conservative and a linear estimate. In reality, the trend is getting worse and it will likely be way less time unless we take action. The drop in men at UT Austin and many other schools is a parabolic decline. It gets worse, faster, every fucking year. Most of the graduation data is 5…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:26 PM
25

Mark Perry missed a good opportunity on grad school enrollment numbers. He used "overall" data, but specifics are more interesting. For degree seeking students at public grad schools the metrics are worse. Let that sink in. When the government is involved, the discrimination is worse. For public grad schools in 2020, 247 women were enrolled for a grad degree for every 100 men. Mens enrollment overall has only tanked since then sooooo probably worse this year.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 03:09 AM
7

Title IX is a US federal civil rights law that says: No person in the United States shall, based on sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 02:44 AM
26

unless that is indeed the goal Men don't get helped. They get blamed. That is the point of the phrase.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/22 01:43 PM
3

The challenge around men is something that the entire higher education community is trying to figure out Complete bullshit, through and through. I havent come across a single university taking this seriously, and the department of education had gone out of its way to smokescreen the numbers in reports so they can ignore the issue. I wouldn't even hazard to say a minority of the educational community is trying to figure it out. The Washington Roundtable, a business group, is launching a study to …
/r/MensRights27/04/22 06:09 PM
4

This is the problem with affirmative action and their insistence on closing the pay gap. Affirmative action isn't as widespread as people think. The problem is far more insidious. OCR, the agency that enforces civil rights in schools, doesn't care and is okay with discrimination against men. If a complaint is strong enough that they can't dismiss it, they won't apply penalties and remedies that dissuade others from doing the same thing. At best OCR requires a change to the program and that's it.…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:16 PM
2

If you are in a domestic US college/university and want to do something about this bullshit let me know in a comment or DM. My complaints have prompted action already, and they are stronger if students are there to help me get evidence or tip me off to violations. Step 1 in ending this accelerating trend is ending the discrimination at schools. This is something we can do.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:12 PM
92

She said "Why would you ever group kids by sex". Looking at all the bullshit programs I file against, grouping kids by sex is something they like to do. A lot.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:40 PM
3

Working on holding schools accountable for violations on Twitter (@MRA_TitleIX). Despite the recent ruling against Stayer U / hackbright, hackbright continues to advertise specifically for women. OCR's investigation report said: None of the 538 students enrolled in the software engineering program indicated a preference for male pronouns [...] OCR has concerns about the University's compliance The University asserted that it doesn't discriminate based on sex, and cited that 3 of 1,207 students u…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/22 04:00 PM
5

Holy shit. Well done Norway
/r/MensRights26/04/22 12:40 PM
32

Any religion that advocates mutilation of children is shit. Freedom of religion doesn't mean freedom to mutilate kids.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 12:34 PM
3

Happens in the US. There was a clothing shop in my town that had a chalk board out front telling boyfriends to wait outside, along with some related drivel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/22 07:19 PM
16

Twitter @MRA_TitleIX With Elon taking over Twitter, the risk going forward should be less. On the other hand, Twitter isn't ideal for creating a community compared to reddit. I'm also active on discord.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/22 06:17 PM
11

The future is female for a good while. Women are the majority of students and are getting >60% of masters degrees. That train isn't slowing, it is accelerating and schools continue to shovel more coal by only having diversity programs when they don't help men. Men still expected to work all the other less desirable jobs though.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 04:08 PM
1

If you are in the US and your employer only has support groups focusing on one gender, you might have a valid EEOC complaint. Unlike OCR, EEOC will file charges in real court against your employer. It is free to file and talk with their expert attorneys. They don't notify your company until charges are signed and filed. It only takes a few minutes to file a complaint.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/22 02:28 PM
13

Activism. Activism. Activism. People are becoming aware. We have, in my opinion passed the initial grass-roots hurdle of developing a solid community across multiple nations. To move to the next level people need to take action and demand change. It isn't enough to be aware. You need to act. Write politicians, organizations, talking heads, news orgs etc. File complaints. Sue employers.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 07:37 PM
4

I know your account is [deleted] now but I do want to respond for others reading. I do believe you were being genuine but it sounds like you lack contextual understanding of the lived experience as a man in the corpo world. I couldn't report this without a very real risk of being fired. I was replaceable, her skills weren't. It would be easy for HR to just say I was being sexist without the facts and fire me without society giving it a second thought. Law firms don't like to take male victims of…
/r/MensRights23/04/22 04:58 PM
70

Happened to me once. Really hurt because I looked up to this person as a mentor and she absolutely knew that was the nature of our professional relationship. It felt like a betrayal. I never had a mentor in that field so it was an important relationship to me. I very much valued and respected her professional competency. She was damn good at her job and I was learning a lot from her. She asked for help diagnosing an unexpected behavior on a project. I was helping over the company chat system. Ra…
/r/MensRights23/04/22 05:51 AM
25

In 2019 the University deployed a “strategic plan” that used gender to discriminate what groups they would focus on in employment gaps. Surprisingly, they chose “female” despite the official government data showing staff at the University was 45.7% men in 2020. In an email on 4/18/2022 they said: [T]he University seeks to promote campus diversity by enrolling and employing a larger number of minorities and women Women are 54.3% of students, 60.5% of staff and the university is intent on enrollin…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 09:58 PM
26

Is this a US school? Allow me to introduce myself. I can help point you to government websites for reporting this. I can also answer questions about my experience filing federal title ix complaints. I am not a lawyer, I am not your lawyer, and it certainly isn't legal advice. It would only be my lived experience that I share. You probably have grounds for a federal title ix complaint. It is free and you are not required to have an attorney, OCR attorneys do the legal work. If you think you might…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 06:14 PM
15

When did you graduate? What is the university? Do you still have access to any of those emails? Feel free to DM me your response. It might be an interesting case to file. I can't file on behalf of anyone, but you can certainly help provide evidence and I can file on my own. Someone helped gather evidence for the complaint in this post, it made the argument monumentally stronger imo. Even if the emails are old they are useful in painting a pattern that changes how current actions are viewed. Just…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 05:57 PM
5

When it comes to public state university systems, there have been instances where school actions are considered state actions. I actually have a current case where the Texas AG is a respondent. The case is expected to succeed against them. I see no difference in Title IX tribunals being legally considered executive actions by nature of the executive funding them and providing their rules. Are all actions by the university executive actions? No, obviously not. Are the policies required and funded…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 04:28 PM
5

However Universities are not under direct control of the Federal Executive branch nor in State Executive branches. I partially agree, but not where it matters. Civil rights, especially Title IX and associated tribunals, at universities are primarily enforced by the Dept of Ed. OCR ("OCR" hereafter). The only penalty they can place on schools without the schools consent is to revoke federal funding. This would be a death sentence to most schools. In 2018 the federal government spent 149 billion o…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 04:13 PM
16

I expect OCR to rule in favor of this case in a general sense. Without community support, I find it unlikely that OCR will include my key demand in the resolution. Please help by signing. We need to send the message that it isn't enough that schools simply end programs like this. We can't allow schools to continue their practice of only helping people based on the gender being "woman" and ignoring similarly (or worse) situated men. Your school might be in violation if it is more than 50% women a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 03:28 PM
29

They are also a violation of the separation of powers. These are run entirely under the power of the executive. The fucking executive is running courts they set the laws for. How is this not a SCOTUS case already?
/r/MensRights22/04/22 02:45 PM
3

It is posted publicly. https://system.suny.edu/sci/postedtraining/
/r/MensRights21/04/22 05:09 PM
12

I remember an anti-rape training I had to do in uni as a student (required orientation stuff). It was a live session in a classroom. They used "the tea video" which is pretty good. They did it in a very gender neutral way and overall, I thought it was excellent. I am a trouble maker and at the end I asked if both parties are equally drunk, can they both be found to have raped the other? They responded very candidly. Something along the lines of "it shouldn't be this way, but the courts and schoo…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 03:15 PM
8

BTW if anyone wants to see that training, the school is legally required to provide all Title IX staff training materials to the public. They either have to have it all posted on their website or they have to provide it upon request. I've done it before, it's as simple as emailing the Title IX coordinator. They usually have a canned response email ready to go. If you find bias in those training materials, that is a Title IX violation and you can file federal complaints about it for free. To avoi…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 03:04 PM
42

For example women will never get ahead in the workplace if courts consistently give them custody over children. That places an extra burden on women and also incentives men to work harder and earn more money to make child support payments. Thus creating a wage gap and also an impression that men are better workers than women. If we pass laws so that men are given equal custody of their children, then women will be free to pursue higher goals in the workplace. This is the kind of stuff I have bee…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/22 02:42 PM
22

Nice! Even if the response is lackluster or nonexistent, this kind of work helps get our voices heard. The more people that do it, the more effective it becomes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/22 04:55 AM
16

I have him on in the background today. His expressions of vulnerability are amazing. It takes a lot of courage to speak about these things. I hope he gets the justice he seeks.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:07 PM
11

It's the NY post. They write shit headlines like this so people post ragebait and they get clicks. Par for the course.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/22 07:18 PM
7

No it is not. There are always going to be extremists that detract by spouting bigotry or violence. Happens with every activist movement. We need to continue to condemn such things as the harmful vitriol that they are. There was a period of time where it was pretty bad, but the moderators of various communities have done an amazing job of getting most of the bullshit cleaned up. We are not extreme enough in that we need more activists. The rage bait gets people reading and engaged, but it isn't …
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:47 PM
8

Don't worry, the Dept. Of Ed. Office of civil rights is just learning this too. Easy mistake to make.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 11:56 PM
9

Doesn't sound like there's any haste to tackle those 410 and 21 other Title IX complaints the two men mentioned in the article lodged. OCR is the agency that handles these complaints. OCR is allowed to be proactive and can select schools for compliance reviews. OCR chooses to not do this for programs that discriminate against men. They will take no action unless a complaint is lodged. When they do rule on a complaint they will do the minimum possible and will almost always refrain from saying th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 11:48 PM
2

I'm only familiar with the products of his Title IX work via news articles and discussions I've had with him. I checked the YouTube channel it does look like he was in that one. I haven't watched it though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 05:30 PM
17

There are very few of us out here doing this, and Kursat is making some real progress. Well done dude, scholarships are a hard one to tackle. Takes a lot of research and time to argue this type of case successfully. I even find the prospect of this kind of case daunting. Kursat and Mark Perry were the two people who inspired my activism when I came face-to-face with the biased leviathan that is school Title IX offices and OCR. Keep up the good fight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 01:37 PM
40

What's more is that sex based scholarships aren't defacto illegal under Title IX. They just have to be implemented and administered in an evenhanded way so the overall effect is balanced. A school that has scholarships for men in nursing, education, social work etc to promote diversity is probably okay to also run a couple women only scholarships in stem. No one is talking about the uncomfortable truth here. They would rather not help women than help men too. The schools could have taken steps t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 01:31 PM
3

"u/MRA_TitleIX" will tag me, typed exactly as is. I guess doing the full link doesn't ping me. 🤷
/r/MensRights19/04/22 01:45 AM
2

Not a lawyer, not your lawyer, and I don't give legal advice. You need to talk to an attorney. You can often get a free consultation regarding your case so you can at least get your bearings and ask some basic questions from someone who can give legal advice. Ask your state bar for recommendations, also poke around for attorneys in your state. Reach out and contact a couple several. Document everything. Go to the school Title IX page and download every document possible, be sure to get the title…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 01:16 AM
14

Thanks! It means a lot to hear this. It can be tiring at times, so hearing this means more than people might think. I tweeted hackbright and strayer (my handle is the same as user name) asking what they are going to do to overcome their legacy of anti male discrimination. I doubt they respond Hackbright also tweeted #ChangeTheRatio and I replied stating their own "ratio" data provided by OCR. The irony of tweeting about changing the ratio when their enrolled students are 0% men and historically …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 12:46 AM
50

I had filed a complaint against Hackbright and Strayer for running this program that is clearly discriminatory. They often went out of their way to avoid saying that men are allowed to attend, a fact that OCR noticed as well. I filed in October 2021, and the resolution was formally issued today. Specifically, the University provided data from the learning management system which indicates only three of the 1,207 students enrolled in the June 2019 through July 2022 cohorts preferred male pronouns…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/22 08:23 PM
4

Go figure right? It's not even like making it gender neutral and need based would make it 1:1 in representation. It would still predominantly help women, and these funds would rather help no one than risk helping a man. It's wild how obvious the sexism is.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 02:56 AM
9

getting a scholarship is a good thing, and the same should apply to a single father, instead of to no one of them. I agree. Ask the scholarship fund why it is being dropped. Most of the time the school doesn't set the rules. The school has no choice but to drop it unless the funders make it gender neutral. Why would the fund rather help no one instead of helping both men and women?
/r/MensRights16/04/22 09:24 PM
8

This is a dicey one. First off, Title IX is super clear as written. A school can not legally discriminate based on sex if they take federal funding. The funding regs for OCR have an exception for scholarships that are held in trusts and other similar instruments. Basically the school can offer them as long as the overall effect is balanced. However, that is not remotely the case in practice. ~2% of gender based scholarships are for men, with the rest being for women. This very clearly fails the …
/r/MensRights16/04/22 09:18 PM
15

It's a shame that the school would rather end scholarship programs instead of award them to men also, but I guess this is technically progress. A lot of these scholarships can't be used if they aren't awarded to women. It's not usualy the choice of the college. It's either award it to women or not at all most of the time.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 09:10 PM
3

I like your analogy a lot. Well done. I think some bumps are expected to happen on this road. Society is still figuring out what it means to break down these heavily entrenched gender roles. We are collectively still figuring out "what next" as we continue progress.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 03:17 PM
26

tldr of background, the state of Texas put into law that this is a "women-focused" university system (effective 9/2021). I stumbled across this reading some legislation, and that prompted a complaint. After a meeting with OCR attorneys on the issue I decided it would be useful to them for me to put together a supplemental. I told them in the meeting that a law like that doesn't get passed unless it is precipitated by that already being a characteristic of the university system. If that is a char…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 01:34 PM
1

tldr of background, the state of Texas put into law that this is a "women-focused" university system (effective 9/2021). I stumbled across this reading some legislation, and that prompted a complaint. After a meeting with OCR attorneys on the issue I decided it would be useful to them for me to put together a supplemental. I told them in the meeting that a law like that doesn't get passed unless it is precipitated by that already being a characteristic of the university system. If that is a char…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:33 PM
15

I recently had the experience of one of their mods trolling on my sub for Title IX activism. Mens lib and their mods don't support activism to have US civil rights laws enforced equally for men. I also remember seeing some info regarding sub crossovers with users of that sub. It's mainly people in women's subs participating there. It is as far away from being a men's rights advocacy/discussion group as you can get while still pretending to be one. Not run by men. Users aren't mainly men. Barely …
/r/MensRights13/04/22 12:55 PM
4

I don't see why it's desirable for colleges to run a secondary court system., when a real court already exists. I know why it is desirable (for the schools and OCR). Courts are run by the judiciary and are held to the law and court interpretations. People in the court system serving critical roles are licensed by the state bar. Practicing law is a privilege. If they fuck up hard enough they lose the privilege to practice. School courts are effectively run by the executive branch. The executive h…
/r/MensRights11/04/22 03:25 PM
3

Education: Boys are more likely to be disciplined with exclusion (suspension, expulsion). Boys are more likely to be held back. Men are less likely to go to college after graduating high-school. Less likely to go at all as well. Men are less likely to graduate on time, and less likely to graduate at all. Men are underrepresented in college for decades. When women were underrepresented to a lesser extent the US passed civil rights laws. Now we have to fight to even get those laws enforced for men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/22 04:29 PM
2

Hahahaha what???? This won't stand in a Title IX hearing. They might let it be used as evidence but courts will undoubtedly strike it down as complete heresy. I can't even imagine how this system can possibly be used without violating due process rights. All this can possibly result in is an amplification of a libel rumor mill with no accountability for the person writing statements. The school might end up being responsible for the libel. Sometimes I think schools like this just want to be sued…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 04:11 PM
9

100%. The school would have massively limited damage to the accused if they did their job right. The university should be responsible for most of that.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 03:49 AM
17

You hear that guys. Don't get mad, SUE. ✊️ Love seeing your comments in these threads. For others reading, we can change these things if we take action instead of being mad. We have paths to activism. If you currently attend a university in the US states and want to help but don't know how, drop me a DM. I file a lot of federal Title IX complaints and sometimes having a student confirm an email or send me a pic of a flyer can turn a dismissal into an investigation.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 03:47 AM
12

Sucks it isn't the university that had to pay this. I looked into it a bit and some core details aren't in this article. The boyfriend texted the accused saying he lied in his testimony and that the accuser had texted him about lying and fabricating the story. The accuser was talking about the encounter with friends afterward but then in the allegations claimed she was too drunk to remember it therefor it was rape. Five witness testified in the (real) court hearing that the parties were not that…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 03:26 AM
3

The "dear colleague" letter was NOT an executive order. You are absolutely right. Still, OCR can't legally change policy without direction from the executive. It is supposed to be an executive order but the fact that it isn't is also a sign of a problem. Title IX has been heavily interpreted by OCR. Each little step they say "this isn't anything new" until we have gone miles from the original intent. he didn't. He let it roll. That's what I'm pointing to. I agree on that. He didn't really commit…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 02:32 AM
2

In this case I think he had to make those changes. Maybe not all of them, but if I recall this was basically court ordered. To make the changes required the executive order.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:01 PM
2

How is Obama responsible for this? The courts themselves have made rulings that produced these kangaroo courts. Dept of Ed. OCR is under the executive and thus the implementation was via the executive, but the requirement came from the judicial branch. Real courts ruled that due process was required. There are massive issues with Title IX implementation but blaming the sitting president isn't correct here. The issue stems from executive overreach and that predates Obama. The core problem is allo…
/r/MensRights06/04/22 02:38 PM
2

Men's high suicide rate is often compared to women's high attempt rate. This is fundamentally flawed by how the data is collected. It is typically gathered based on reports in hospital visits. Men are less likely to report injury as a suicide attempt (not calling reckless behavior passive suicidality). Men are more likely to use binary outcomes like using a gun. Women's choice of method is often less likely to be a binary outcome of dead vs totally fine. This results in more hospital visits and …
/r/MensRights06/04/22 01:32 PM
2

Men underperform in education across the board. Less likely to go to college after high-school. Less likely to get aid. Less likely to graduate on time. The trends were getting worse before covid. The already accelerating trends sped up with covid. For example, men were 78% of total lost enrollment during covid, but they are only 42% of students. When there was an 10 point gap in enrollment (45 women to 55 men) the US had civil rights laws passed (title ix) and made a national effort to get more…
/r/MensRights06/04/22 01:22 PM
3

You don't need to be the immediate victim to file a complaint about federal money being used to conduct discrimination in education and employment. It is a violation of federal funding rules and if you are a US citizen you have standing for writing a complaint to the relevant agency. This one is a bit technical to put together but I will work on it after work today. I think I'll have a complaint fired off tonight.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 05:46 PM
6

One of the goals of this initiative is to prioritize recruitment of applicants who are underrepresented in our law enforcement workforce, including women and diverse candidates. This is a Title IX violation, probably Title VII as well. It is a government agency training program. They are not legally allowed to have priority nor preference in gender. I will work on filing. If you find discrimination that might be a Title IX violation feel free to ping me in the future. EDIT: complaint filed last …
/r/MensRights05/04/22 03:02 PM
23

When you have equal or more freedom to your "oppressor" in life choices, education choices, partner choices, child-related choices, occupation choices, leadership choices and a longer, healthier life to make those choices, you aren't the oppressed. When you turn around and expect your "oppressor" to ensure there are no negatives of those life choices, no doors that close, no lost opportunity to your decisions and paths taken, while denying the ability to make the same choices to your "oppressor"…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 02:36 PM
26

Nationally, women under 30 who work full time, year-round earn about 93 cents on the dollar compared with men in the same age range, measured at the median. Later they say it's 44 hours per week for men and 42 for women at the median. I wonder why they didn't use the mean for better comparison. Anyway, using medians this translate the wage gap to a $0.025 difference when normalized to hours worked. Women make 2.5% less than men when time worked and age of career are controlled an no other factor…
/r/MensRights03/04/22 02:18 AM
21

The two big education-related highlights for pithy usage in a broad topic on being a "men's world" are: Since 1988 the percentage of female high school graduates that enroll in a college has exceeded males, except for 1995. Currently it is 59% of males, and 66% of females. Source Since 1979 the number of women in college has exceeded men, with a 2020 disparity of over 3.2 million students. The percentage of students that are women has been above 55% since 1990. Source Can education be called a "…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 10:53 PM
2

You may be able to get a free consult with an attorney. It is pretty easy to do. You should consider retaining legal council. If you don't, at least get a free consult to get your bearings. You may be able to file a Title IX complaint with federal OCR. It is free, you don't need to be a legal expert, and you are not required to have an attorney to file. OCR's attorneys handle it from there. In my experience, OCR is often biased against mens cases, but not always, so it's worth a considering. At …
/r/MensRights01/04/22 05:29 PM
2

🍻
/r/MensRights01/04/22 03:09 AM
1

Thanks. I am unlikely to change this person opinion, but engaging in good faith when I have the energy to do so is important. Never know if someone else reading may learn something or realize a bias view they had wasn't aligned with reality. No one is perfect. We all have unconscious bias. People who have willful ignorance won't change, but people who are unknowingly ignorant may. There was a good philosophytube video on ignorance. The person who does these is a transwoman which I think adds a r…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:30 AM
1

No. Within ONE SINGLE peer group, for about five years of their lives, women out earn men. There were 2000 peer groups in that study. Maybe you don't understand what a peer group is. When normalized to hours works and total time spend in career it almost vanishes anyway. Again, I am talking about men and women IN TOTAL, overall. Yea and aggregate stats overwhelmingly show higher success for women in education so it is certainly time to stop discriminating against men in education If you think Gi…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:23 AM
1

Choosing to do poorly and leave university is a choice as well. Yet you think it should be accommodated. Obviously. And illegal discriminatory programs are illegal. I have no idea how well known I am nor do I care. It's unlikely they don't contribute to the issue of mens dropping enrollment. There are still schools that explicitly do not allow men in violation of federal law. When gender gap was flipped and less severe we had civil rights laws passed to fix it. It's a pretty minimal response to …
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:48 AM
1

False fucking statements. Oh my god. We were talking about Denmark. Ultimately, what I said was true: men make the most money and occupy the most leadership and power roles compared to women in education. The dominant desvriptive emographic of people in the top 0.01% is power. Not their gender. Not really sure how your argument holds for education considering total educators and total staff all show a massive over represention of women. The outcomes show a massive bias toward women. Pointing to …
/r/MensRights31/03/22 10:52 PM
1

I am pointing to very explicit and pervasive instances of illegal anti-male discrimination stated explicitly in institutional policy. Surely it contributes to the issue of male enrollment. Even if it didn't it's still illegal discrimination. You have made false statements about representation in educators. When proven wrong you attempted to use a small subset (5%) to justify the claim. When shown to be a bad argument, you then argued they don't have any power anyway. You ask how schools discrimi…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 09:56 PM
2

I added a summary to the comment and the links support it with specific examples. Most of the linked posts have a summary as well.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:08 PM
1

Links below to some cases, most of these I have filed myself. I don't post all the cases I file though, and of the ones I have posted these are only a couple. I think I have ~20 active cases. Schools still have lots of (illegal) women-only scholarships, awards, grants, classes, programs, camps, mentoring groups etc. Not enrolling / dropping out is a side effect of the invidious environment that discrimination creates. Discrimination contributes to it. https://www.reddit.com/r/MRA_TitleIX/comment…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:55 PM
1

Title IX is a federal civil rights law, the entire text is: No person in the United States shall, based on sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. It is links sex-discrimination in education to a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th ammendment of the US Constitution.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:48 PM
1

Going into this, I want to make sure it's clear that I don't blame any gender for any of these issues. In my opinion it is mainly an institutional issue. What I state below is what I think the dominant issue is, but it certainly isn't the only issue. I also don't support any gendered programs in education (excluding stuff like sports and choir). My response is long, but well informed since this is my area of activism. I hope you read this in good faith and don't assume I am anti-women simply bec…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 05:24 PM
1

I’m sure there’s even more parity when you include the admin and janitorial staff! Are you kidding me?? Just administration. You know. The people who do the hiring and admissions. Case still stands that only 24% of educators in the US are men. Do educators hold the power or not? If they don't why do you talk about the gap in professorship which accounts for 5% of educators? If they do, why do you ignore that only 24% of educators are men? Do you think professors dictate gradeschool classes? Powe…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:59 AM
1

Women do not control the education system That isn't true either. The gender gap in total staff in college has women at 55% representation. That includes all the people making the hiring and promotion decisions. Literally the only place in faculty you will find a gender gap favoring men is in end stage professorship. Men have the vast majority of the money and power in every sector and education is no different. Who gets the most decision making power and money in education? Men. Idk what else t…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:22 AM
1

The overall gender gap in education in the US is 24% men. Idk why you are only using a small subset of the late-stage career in education to disprove a point regarding the gender gap in education? That's like 5% of educators in your subset. It isn't remotely descriptive of the topic.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:10 AM
1

Again, what is the gender parity in full time Professor roles? Not part time instructor. It's 55% male for full time tenure track positions (all levels of "professor"). Data is in the link I provided previously. I find it a tad irrelevant to what the comment chain above is, but I have no problem providing what you want. The other user was talking about gender gaps in instructional staff, tenure track is a very very small subset of that. Professor being the highest level of tenure track positions…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:59 AM
1

Sure thing. This is for the USA data I used. post-secondary ed: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d20/tables/dt20_315.20.asp grade-school and all-levels: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/clr#1 The comment you were replying to didn't mention Denmark, nor did your reply. It looks like what you replied to was edited, so maybe it mentioned Denmark before I got here? Either way, these are USA stats which I thought was partially relevant to the discussion that didn't specify a region. For …
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:39 AM
1

This is patently untrue. At the university level, most professors are men. As it pertains to what is being talked about, the percentage of men in instructional roles in post-secondary education in the US is 52% men. For grade school, it is about 11% male teachers. Overall levels of education, men represent 24% of instructional staff. Source NCES (USA govt) data. I assume you mean instructional faculty since that is what the other person is talking about. Correct me if I am wrong and you weren't …
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:13 AM
4

Indeed. OCR allows these things to happen. They only (sometimes) take action when people complain. It's up to us to fix this bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/22 10:44 PM
13

Btw isn't this also a violation of the US Constitution, and not just title ix? Yes. The fourteenth ammendment's equal protection clause. Title IX basically links sex discrimination in education to an equal protection clause violation. It makes it so we don't need to argue that discriminating by sex is a violation of the equal protection clause. We only need to show it is a Title IX violation. It is already established as an accepted relationship. As a result, we can use court interpretation of t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/22 03:37 PM
34

Woke up early this morning and threw together a complaint before work. This complaint stems from the government of Texas passing a bill (SB1126, 2021) which stated that this university system is "women-focused" which is a violation of Title IX. I am requesting that the university change its name, and that the bill be amended to remove gendered language. Usually it is the school itself that says a program is "women-focused." I have not seen such a brazen violation codified in state law until toda…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/22 12:48 PM
1

Houston Texas is the trafficking capital of the US. 25% of victims trafficked to the US are brought in through Texas. It's actually a really good choice of location based on where the need is located.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:56 PM
1

CALL TO ACTION There are a couple of us out here working on changing things, but we need your help badly. If you go to a college in the US, help by reaching out to me with info on programs. If you are in the US (student or not) consider filing complaints with OCR. This is snowballing fast, we can change these things if more people help with a couple hours on a weekend. We have to keep momentum, and with the new title IX changes coming the timing to get involved is perfect. If you want to get fam…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:30 PM
1

Glad to see Mr. Perry talking about this in his blog. We have exchanged emails on this topic and I expected something like this would be published soon. a. You can file an internal complaint by email with your university’s Title IX Office I personally find filing with the school to be a tremendously bad idea. The school has already determined compliance or is willing to turn a blind eye. I have had schools handle complaints unofficially in "the spreadsheet" instead of filing in their system. The…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:09 PM
2

there should be no real problem correct? You would think so, but in practice I doubt it plays out this way with admissions and administration. They basically showed the trans men the door when they came out if I inferred the event correctly. It does bring up a good question, can the school clearly define the admission criteria of "living like a woman" and demonstrate that this admission criteria does not disproportionately impact trans women in admissions? It's basically the same thing that plac…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:24 PM
3

So, essentially as long as you claim to be a woman, you can attend an all girl's school? It isn't that simple. From what I read they don't take it at face value for trans people. They look at many factors and encourage trans people to talk about it in their personal story and possibly with school admin as well. They look for "markers" in the documents provided to admissions. That on its own is a violation. Basically if you are a trans woman they will have extra hoops for you to jump through. The…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 01:55 PM
4

I filed this complaint against primarily against Barnard University, which no longer meets the requirements to maintain a "one sex" admissions policy. To see the details, take a look at the document. It is too long to post directly. For those that don't want to read 13 pages, or don't want to follow a link to a google drive pdf, check out the summary. Supporting evidence for my allegations is in the document though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/22 02:45 AM
15

Goes to show you how they intentionally abuse stats. Women are more likely to recieve federal aid (7%-point gap) and more likely to recieve non-federal aid (2%-point gap). Women are more likely to graduate on time (10%-point gap) and more likely to graduate within 6 years (6%-point gap), a proxy for graduating at all. Men are more likely to graduate late (3%-point gap). The difference between graduating on time (10%) and graduating late (3%) values is a result of many men not graduating at all. …
/r/MensRights24/03/22 10:16 PM
7

Discrimination against men in education needs to end. Want it to end? Do something about it. This is why I file Title IX complaints. If you are in the US and want to help, drop me a DM. It could be as simple as helping to gather evidence at your university or by writing your own complaints. Even a little bit of help from a current uni student confirming if they got an email can make a case in some instances. It's easier than you think and each complaint helps push us forward toward equality in e…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:32 PM
2

If you are in the US and want to fight against institutional sexism in universities, drop me a DM. I am an activist who files heaps of Title IX complaints. We could always use more people getting involved.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/22 07:03 PM
1

Absolutely. My partner has been extremely supportive of my activist work. It's a civil rights is a common topic of conversation, and it isn't just limited to men.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 08:44 PM
2

Wow. Didn't know. Thanks for sharing that. I'll have to try and find a way to watch it. I'm sure it will show up on YouTube
/r/MensRights18/03/22 06:24 PM
2

I saw that case. The default approach of agencies will be to exclude trans people until there is more clarity on the issue. It will undoubtedly feel shitty for the excluded people. I suspect that this is based on bio-sex based discrimination being legally allowed when it is a useful proxy for the real conditional that we cant really define or measure. Until society can produce that conditional, it's likely to stay that way in schools.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 04:51 PM
7

Was going to comment about filing with eeoc, but this is not a US company. The voucher counts as a benefit under US law and this would be illegal here. Maybe something exists where you are that you can use for legal action?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 04:35 PM
6

In the US, ads for rooms being based on gender is only allowed if the person placing the ad lives in the same domicile. I think this is actually reasonable. If it is a landlord renting out a full unit and they dont live in that unit, it is not allowed.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 04:25 PM
2

A lot of professional sports teams (i.e. NBA) don't have gender requirements, only skill/fitness/size etc. Women deserve to be able to compete on sports teams (obviously). The whole idea behind their own league was that there was a fundamental developmental difference between men and women during puberty that makes men better at almost every physical sport. Even taking hormones after puberty doesn't change some of this. Maybe it reduces how much muscle can be made, but height and bone structure …
/r/MensRights18/03/22 04:19 PM
5

Did you know that allegations of bias don't just apply to the programs but how the school decides to make programs? A good many court cases (some in SCOTUS) have said that anti-discrimination law applies to the decision-making process. It is a violation if schools only develop gendered courses for women in physics (for example) and refuse to provide similar programs to help men when they are similarly underrepresented in other programs. The argument that not enough resources are available is als…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 02:50 PM
1

Activism >>> ragebait. A lot of what you describe is learning how to deal with this shit, and I am not so sure we should. Let it make you upset. Channel that into activism. Activism is tiring work that saps a lot of mental energy. It's not just work, it's work that is hard, everyone tries to stop you from doing it, there is failure more than not, and it drains your mental energy. What we need is more activists. Sure posting ragebait online can, in its own way, be activism. What is the point if p…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 02:00 PM
1

I can probably help if you give some details of what you are looking for if it is for the US. You can seen aggregate enrollment data here. Poke around on the website and you can probably find what you need. Edit: I am using some of this in a document I am writing. Feel free to steal wording if you want. Where I could, I used the most recent documents. There were some instances where the 2021 reports were not yet available, so I had to go to the 2020 reports. Since 1988 the percentage of female h…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 06:43 PM
5

When it comes to educational issues it will get a lot worse before it gets better. We all know the stats about men dropping out or not going to college at alarming rates. Those rates are accelerating. It's getting worse faster. Right now, the gender gap in college is 50% worse than it was when Title IX was passed. When women were underrepresented, legislation was passed to help them. Now that genders are flipped and the gap is worse, the government says nothing. In a recent OCR document on the d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/22 02:26 PM
4

My nephew is at a top worldwide company. They have excellent paternal leave. Most (US) companies have policies that are facially gender neutral regarding parental leave. There is typically a base amount of leave for it, and extra leave for the "primary" caregiver. It is certainly needed for policies to be gender neutral, but if men don't take that "primary cargiver" to the same frequency as women, it doesn't really solve the issue. Men need to be taking extended leave to be with their kids more …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:20 PM
3

If people choose to stay home and be provided for by a spouse that is also good. I want freedom of choice without expectation. That includes men staying home to take care of their kids while their wife works. Women do get discriminated against for being of child bearing age because the company sees them as a liability for taking extended leave. It's an issue companies assess by asking questions disguised as "small talk" in interviews. This isn't solved by selectively supporting women. Both paren…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 05:13 PM
5

Nice! When discussing this with non-MRA's I find it is important to always mention that just because discrimination isn't a factor for aggregate stats on pay doesn't mean it doesn't exist or that it isn't a major issue for people who do experience it. We can't be so reckless as to claim that discrimination doesn't exist because it isn't a primary driver of the pay gap. It is the same flaw in interpreting the wage gap that leads others to claim it is evidence of discrimination. By acknowledging t…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:55 PM
6

Education/Prevention - teach male students the dangers of sexual contact with women. I am sorry for being blunt, but this is a terrible idea. We should teach everyone the legal risks of sexual contact with others. No need to gender it. MRAs can't fall into the trap of perpetuating stereotypes even if those stereotypes seem relevant. We need to move past viewing a gender neutral issue as gendered simply because it primarily impacts one gender. Feminists did this and it produced a lot of the issue…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:50 PM
4

Of course, and that is totally fine if everyone is consenting to joint use of income. It's just that the argument seems oddly focused on earnings rather than who has the money. It only makes sense if the assumption that the earnings gap is a result of discrimination is true, and it isn't. On average and as a class women earn less money per year than men. The primary driver is life choices. There is no observable impact as women spend the majority of discretionary income. So without discriminatio…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:39 PM
31

Warren Farrell, a famous feminist, wrote a book on how flawed the "wage gap" concept is. It largely boils down to life choices, not discrimination. It should be considered that sex based discrimination in pay does exist (for all genders) and stating that it is not proven to be a significant factor in the wage gap does not invalidate the lived experience of people who have been discriminated against. It is interesting that people focus on the earnings gap and ignore the spending gap. Even if the …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:59 PM
10

Instead of putting the onus on men to just deal with it, we should encourage men to file Title IX complaints whenever they encounter these issues. Force OCR to hear our voice.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:54 PM
16

have often stacked the deck against the accused, failing to offer protections such as a presumption of innocence or adequate ability to rebut allegations. Universities absolutely do this and regardless of political grand-standing of the executive branch, (real) courts have shown this is the case MANY times. In Doe v. Purdue University (No. 17-3565 (7th Cir. 2019)), the court even allowed the financial pressure of the schools to find men guilty as supportive of what was otherwise only circumstant…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:22 PM
2

Considering OCR is literally the watchdog for Title IX violations, they are primarily the responsible party for its violation. They are the arbiters of who does and does not get continued funding from the dept of education. The only penalty for violating Title IX is revocation of federal funding. OCR uses this like a gun to the head of universities, and universities will comply with demands and penalties that are at the whim of OCR. The problem is OCR is under the executive branch and caters to …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:22 AM
8

Certainly. I was making a point of correction on language you used, not implying you weren't aware. I only said this because you asked if it accurately articulated the issue, and I think that statement could be tightened up.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 10:58 PM
5

Dept of Education OCR is complicit in this. They published a paper pdf warning on the impact of covid across segments of the student population. Men as a whole were mentioned twice. Once in a data dump that provided no discussion on the absurd disparity in stats. Another time when saying enrollment in college was dropping before covid for both "women and men." For the last statement they reference an article about how men are no longer enrolling in college and "feel lost" in the university syste…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:11 PM
22

Men aren't "staying behind and fighting." They are forced to stay. There isn't a choice here.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 08:51 PM
20

It is worth adding that personal preference producing disparity of represention is not the same thing as discrimination. Furthermore, a disparity of preference is not an "exceedingly persuasive justification" needed for enacting discriminatory policies to balance represention. In fact, broad generalizations about preference are specifically not a justification per statements by Justice Ginsberg herself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/22 11:56 PM
6

I will be publishing it for community signatures when I'm done editing and before I file. If my expectations come to fruition, this will be a landmark case. There are still many things that can roadblock that though, one of which is tipping my hand early and giving the university time to cover their tracks. Once I get some key signatories on board I'll give the community a couple days to sign before filing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/22 11:41 PM
4

Women shoot AK's just fine. People act like physical strength is the only thing that matters, which is absurd. It matters for some things in war, not everything. I understand that Ukraine does not have American laws, but I'd like to break down how this argument is fatally flawed, at least in context of the American legal system because it is useful for explaining the issue and because it is easy for you to look into detailed arguments of the court for a more precision breakdown if you want it. D…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 05:42 PM
1

Voluntary conscription. Sign up if you want to. Don't if you don't want to. Add or remove yourself from the list whenever. Only restriction is based on age.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 05:16 PM
25

Women are not underrepresented in stem. u/thetinmenblog had a good post / slide pack on this. https://www.reddit.com/gallery/p9xbbe
/r/MensRights09/03/22 03:25 PM
4

If this was the US I would just say that as someone with power of attorney for the patient I will be attending all counseling with the doctor unless the patient doesn't want me there. If a similar thing exists in Mexico (probably does) you can say the same thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/22 06:15 PM
9

I am not familiar with the laws in Mexico but I assume they have some laws common to most countries that if something happens to your wife and she can't give consent to medical procedures that you are defaulted to as the decision maker. It would be important that you remain informed of all aspects of your wife's pregnancy so you can provide informed consent to things in an emergency. You might not have time to read history docs in an emergency. You need to be in that room asking questions so you…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/22 05:57 PM
1

Check out this post. It has a heap of sources and some discussion of the victimization of men. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/ocq8r9/some_sources_on_sexual_abuse_of_men_and_boys_part/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/22 05:53 PM
2

It's a good discord with a developed community. It is probably exactly what you are looking for.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:19 PM
27

Thanks for sharing. I never really considered the fertility / surrogate aspect. I learned something today. It doesn't surprise me you are treated this way. It is definitely an issue of discrimination worthy of attention.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/22 02:55 PM
5

If anyone knows people that were/are first-year freshman at the University of Illinois school of engineering, please drop me a DM. The more recent the better, but anything in the last 5 years works. I am working on a Title IX complaint and statements would be incredibly valuable. I also need to check a couple of things that I would need to be a first-year engineering student to confirm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 02:14 AM
4

This is the correct time to do it. But it should be pitched that the law is unconstitutional and SCOTUS has signaled they would rule that way. It's not that we need to change the draft. We don't currently have one until the law is changed, since unconstitutional laws have no legal weight. SCOTUS has been very clear that people are not required to follow unconstitutional laws, even if they haven't been ruled unconstitutional yet. Combine that with SCOTUS saying that there is unlikely to be a exce…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/22 03:59 PM
6

Prohibits classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in certain grade levels They can't discuss sexual orientation or gender identity at all. Let me repeat that, "at all." If the school decides to talk about how reproduction works and mentions a traditional nuclear family you can almost certainly file Title IX complaints. If they mention gender of the participants, that's a Title IX complaint. If they say "when a man and a woman love eachother" -> Title IX complaint. If the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/22 03:37 PM
3

Go with what u/SamaelET said. I don't mind my sub being cross-posted or linked on pro-mra subs as long as it is okay with the mods. Sounds like making a post about the program itself and making a comment with a link to my post is what they want. I think that's totally fine awesome. People can also ping me in other subs if they think I should see something or want my opinion on Title IX related stuff. I am also willing to write complaints against programs if someone knows of one. Sometimes the re…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/22 01:55 PM
11

Absolutely. I am not a lawyer nor do I have a degree in law. I don't give legal advice either. I would be happy to share my personal understanding of things (which has the possibility of being wrong), my experiences in filing, and what I might consider doing. Some of my resources my be helpful as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/22 10:37 PM
39

I am shocked, but not totally surprised how OCR handled my A&M case. When the Biden administration took over, the interactions with the team handling the case evaporated. Previously there were follow-up questions and phone calls, they were even interested in getting my attorney fees covered by the school due to the school's failure to do an intake on my rights and options as a complainant. A couple weeks after Lhamon came back into the picture the case was shut down despite all previous indicati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/22 07:12 PM
1

Note, this is an academy that Strayer started. The investigation is for the academy. There is a separate investigation being opened against Strayer University as well under OCR 11-22-2018
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/22 04:16 PM
6

They have also now banned them from leaving.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:42 PM
5

Anytime. Kangaroo courts are terrifying and have a track record of carry out horrendous objectives of institutions/governments. This isn't new territory, and the lessons to be learned are there for viewing. Take a look at legaldictionary's definition of a kangaroo court. Below is a list of rights that kangaroo courts commonly violate, I put the one's that these Title IX "courts" currently violate in bold. The right to be assumed innocent until proven guilty The right to be involved in, and to co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 12:35 AM
5

Yea. I'll add some links here. I already provided links to two posts I had regarding OCR cases, you can look at those and see official OCR case details and resolutions there as first hand evidence. You can look at the Title IX legal manual issued by the DOJ for general Title IX rules. You can look at 34 CFR 106 for the regulations on dept of education providing funding. 34 CFR 106 is like Title IX + some other strings and requirements the dept of education requires. Those two documents back up a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/22 05:52 PM
8

I am not a lawyer but I file a lot of Title IX and civil rights complaints regarding discrimination; the "you can't attend because you are xyz gender" kind. Title IX was originally only about that kind of discrimination. When it was determined that sexual harassment was a form of discrimination schools were required by law to take action and get involved with issues of interpersonal violence and rape. Failure to do so can result in all federal funding being pulled. This created "sexual harassmen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/22 03:56 PM
1

Not a reason not to try. Let other people tell you no, rather than yourself. And OCR dismissing a case isn't the end of the story. There is an appeal and then you can escalate to congress / senators. I have a senators case staff looking into a case where OCR did me dirty.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 04:27 PM
10

It is what it is. I file paperwork for Title IX complaints regardless. I even go after companies who are in violation of funding agreements under state and federal law. It can result in getting millions pulled from a company.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 02:12 PM
6

Circumcision is wrong and should not be performed. Two exceptions exist. It is okay if it is medically necessary akin to removing an appendix that is about to burst. "Cleanliness" is not a medical necessity. It is okay if the person who it is being done to is a legal adult and requested it be done. Adults can choose to modify their bodies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/22 04:23 PM
253

If this is in the USA you can file a Title IX complaint with federal OCR for free. If you are under 18 you will need a parent to sign the paperwork. Can be done with an online form and takes about an hour. If you want links let me know and I'll provide them.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 03:05 PM
10

My sisters and mom are all extremely needy and pushy, always getting their way and they have their husbands whipped, I’m embarrassed for them. I hate the way my mom treats my dad especially, she is borderline abusive. It's interesting and par for the course that men who are victims of abusive behavior by their spouse are called "whipped." It's victim blaming and belittling. It implies the victim is less-than or should have done something about it. It doesn't put the blame on the partner who comm…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 08:39 PM
3

It’s crazy and scary how much is redirected and censored in search. Try searching for ‘male rape victim forced to pay child support’ on Google or here. Not disagreeing with you at all when I say this. It is important to use incognito when testing search results. Google will alter results based on past searches and selections. My results will not be the same as yours. Just an FYI for anyone doing this.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 08:33 PM
1

If that's what the dad wants, that's what they get. Men have a right to choose gifts that align with traditional gender roles. They also have the right not to choose gifts like that. I have a friend who loves tools for his birthday because these are supporting his hobbies. No different than getting a painter some paints, just be sure to talk with the person to make sure you are getting the right tool/paints for their hobby.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 05:29 PM
1

If the programs are useful for women, there is no reason they won't be useful for men. The only reason to oppose them is if people don't want to help men. Having programs for men doesn't diminish the fact that the parallel programs are stull useful for women. Inclusion has no tolerance for exclusion. What country do you go to school in? I am assuming Germany. I am not familiar with German law, but in the US these programs are illegal for universities. We still have them, but they are illegal. Co…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 05:25 PM
4

Great work. Signed. I wonder if you would be interested in another critical Title IX topic as well. Thoughts / comments on it would be great. Courts have ruled that gendered language in program titles and descriptions doesn't violate Title IX. A women's literature course studies written work by women and does not reference the gender of those attending, so its legal. A men's basketball course references the gender of those attending but the discrimination is legal so the name of the program is l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/22 05:57 PM
2

It would potentially be an interesting avenue to use in family court. I am not sure how or where it would apply but I am far from an expert on family court. Conceptually I want to distinguish that who gives the funding is critically important. The dept of education's Title IX regs are 34 cfr 106, anyone taking their money must comply. For all other federal agencies it is the Title IX legal manual. What you want to read is the Title IX legal manual issued by the department of Justice. The manual …
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:58 PM
2

It was a cascade of things. The abbreviated version is that on the first day of my undergrad the school president addressed my class and said something along the lines of "this year we had the largest enrollment of women in our schools history, which explains why it was also the highest grades in school history." It was incredibly sexist and hit hard since I had noticed for a long time the grading and treatment disparity between genders in grade school. This is probably the defining moment that …
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:45 PM
2

I am not a lawyer and this isn't legal advice. Title IX is unlikely to be applicable to things in family court. No person in the United States shall, based on sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. While commonly thought of as applying to education, it actually applies to any activity. Running a marathon through a federal park that only allows women would …
/r/MensRights19/01/22 06:17 PM
9

In regard to the gender part of this comment chain, most universities in the US are like this. Women have outnumbered men for over 30 years. The gender disparity in universities is worse than when Title IX was passed, but with the genders flipped. Universities continue to flagrantly violate the law all the time with women only classes, teams, mentoring etc. I've even seen universities hold women only job fairs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 11:06 PM
1

In this case my argument is that they started breaking down gender roles for women which is a big step toward the goal of breaking down gender roles for men as well. Can't stop seeing men as providers if women are expected not to work real jobs. Sure, it's a bit thin and not exactly big direct action helping men, but it's a critical step that would have needed to take place either way to get to where we want to go. I'm not giving out a pass here, just saying some good things that did happen that…
/r/MensRights18/01/22 10:58 PM
4

A law like Title IX is a great thing. Anti discrimination policies in education are critical. This is a law that needs to exist. Sure, there are currently major problems with application, kangaroo courts, and use as a political ideology tool. As it was written though, the law is good. Don't confuse issues with how it is being applied with the law itself being a bad thing. Title IX allows for people to file complaints against discriminatory programs and force legal action that they don't have to …
/r/MensRights18/01/22 10:52 PM
32

Feminism has harmed men in many ways, yes. I'm not disputing that. But let's look at some ways it has helped men. This is focused on the US and might not apply elsewhere. I think it is important to consider that some big hurdles were crossed by feminist movements that will make our work easier. While they were designed to benefit women, many aspects of their work laid down the road we now travel. Many of these points have caveats and aren't perfect in execution by feminists, but they are still a…
/r/MensRights18/01/22 07:13 PM
2

If you are interested and willing to do any writing, we would be willing to review and distribute it. I would like to take you up on this. Going to work on brainstorming some key topics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 08:17 PM
18

I absolutely love the work you do and it was part of what inspired the things I do now. I have a major concern with the talk regarding rights under Title IX. This includes your group as well as the nation at large. When people talk about rights under Title IX they are typically only talking about rights under a subset of Title IX, sexual harassment. While this is certainly a critical area of discussion for rights, everyone seems to ignore the importance of rights under the rest of Title IX. I un…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 06:52 PM
2

It's absolutely wild to me that this even exists. It's an obvious violation of civil rights law and Verizon isn't stupid. Having worked at large corporations like this, their legal team certainly looked it over. There is no way they didn't knowingly violate the law. The thing is, they know OCR never shows their teeth for these things and at worst they simply have to spend an hour on some training video as punishment. So not only do they violate civil rights law in a flagrant way, they spent mone…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 03:52 PM
1

Stop participating and supporting sexist educational programs simply because they benefit your gender. Speak out about not supporting the practice of gatekeeping educational opportunity by gender. Everyone wants to be an advocate until they get an opportunity that benefits them because of their gender. So many social media posts about D&I from people who actively violate civil rights law by excluding people from educational programs on the basis of gender. Being an activist is good, but it needs…
/r/MensRights11/01/22 03:45 PM
3

I filed a Title IX against several schools partnering with Verizon to administer a single sex scholarships and internship. OCR kicked it to FSA, FSA kicked it back. I asked OCR to assign a case number or explain why they think it belongs with FSA. OCR didn't explain why. I followed up and OCR tried kicking it to FSA again without saying anything. This is a stalling tactic being used so that the scholarships and internships kick off and OCR doesn't have to block them. Resolution will probably onl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/22 05:18 PM
5

About that ‘women’s biggest concern is not being raped, mine is wi-fi’. Can't be concerned with being raped if you can't be raped by the way the law is defined. (That's a joke) It's comedy though. I don't like what he said but I think comedians get a special pass on content they use. I think comedians serve a special role in society and tone policing them is objectively bad. They are good at getting conversations started and at allowing people to laugh off frustrations and experiences that may b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/22 03:52 PM
1

Rip. I missed that.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 10:05 PM
2

If you find examples of female professors making the same remarks with genders flipped and not getting fired you have a Title IX case. Free and easy to file if you have the evidence.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 10:04 PM
4

If there is anything you want to file a Title ix complaint against, let me know. It's easier than you think and you can file for free and without an attorney at a federal level. How ironic if, after a half-century of historic, overdue progress integrating women fully into the nation’s economic, social and political life, we gave back the immense societal gains of that climb because men stopped holding up their end. This alone is probably a violation. Use of sex based stereotypes and generalizati…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 10:01 PM
0

File a federal title ix complaints if you are in the USA. You are not required to file with the school. You can file for free without an attorney with OCR. From there, OCR's attorneys handle it. Hmu if you have questions. Feel free to DM.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 09:55 PM
16

Yea I'd find it obnoxious. I wouldn't want to change my name just to have the same last name as my partner. Why would I expect them to do the same? If they want to they can, no problem. If they don't, that is fine too. Doesn't change anything for me and equality means putting the same expectations on me as I would my partner.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 05:51 PM
1

Great work. Thanks for all you do!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/22 05:21 PM
2

Do I hear someone looking to get involved in Title IX activism!? Feel free to ping me and check out my sub dedicated to it. I'll take a look at this sometime today. Feel free to DM. I'll update this comment as I find stuff (for those reading comments). They partner with public schools, so any program used by those schools must the Title IX complaint. Of the state branches I searched, all were covered by Title IX. I also sent an email to OCR asking if they are covered. I don't see funding from ot…
/r/MensRights04/01/22 05:41 PM
1

the feminist movement came out of nowhere to district that movement against the rich I strongly disagree. The success of civil rights movements is directly related to how aligned they are with economic interests of the ruling class. Women were integrated into the workforce / voting etc not because it is intrinsically a good thing (it is) but because it doubled the labor pool and decreased the cost of labor. Why is there so much support for more women in stem but not sanitation workers? Because s…
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:28 PM
1

Of course the whole reason we see colleges adjudicating such cases is precisely because they don’t have to offer due process. Not exactly. The reason we see schools doing this is because Title IX and 34 CFR 106 compels them to. If they don't take proactive steps to eliminate sexual harassment they can have their funding pulled. When doing so, it was decided by real courts that due process rights must be afforded to the accused due to how impactful the outcomes are. The problem is that the people…
/r/MensRights03/01/22 05:52 PM
1

The underlying problem is a balancing of risk done by the university creates a massive conflict of interest. A university that does not comply with Title IX can have their funding pulled. For most universities, this is a death sentence. If the school does nothing, they are done for. If they side with accusers and they find a respondant guilty despite violating their rights, at worst they get a counter lawsuit for damages. It doesn't sink them. If they design the system to favor people accused, a…
/r/MensRights03/01/22 05:29 PM
2

A major argument for the quote you have in the title wasn't addressed. Men do occupy a majority of leadership positions. It is then assumed that these people represent "men" as a class, which is untrue. They represented wealthy "owners" of land / business etc. They represent the ruling class and oligarchs, not the "common man." I do understand how someone might see the gender of leaders and say something like that, but it isn't a valid conclusion. It is completely different than politicians maki…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 03:12 PM
5

Exactly. This is why I am involved in filing Title IX complaints. Title IX develops in small steps based on cases and I seek to get more male voices in that space. Did you know the rights offered by schools aren't actually rights unless they are mirrored by 34 CFR 106 or some other law? I had my "rights" violated by a school but OCR dismissed it because the school isn't required to offer those rights. They were meaningless and at the whim of the school. OCR under the current director has intent …
/r/MensRights30/12/21 05:22 PM
3

Nice. Was looking for that. Thanks! The accused in Ms. Garrett’s case was given the choice to accept responsibility or face a formal hearing. In accepting responsibility, the accused was merely given a deferred suspension. In sum, a white male student, accused of the same violations as Plaintiff, based on more egregious facts received a deferred suspension and no expulsion. In contrast, Plaintiff, an African American student athlete, was permanently expelled and arrested for the same alleged con…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 04:03 PM
2

It has its pros and cons. For me, the big things are personal time and my own physical space. In previous relationships I often felt like I was losing that, but couldn't really put it into words correctly at the time. It's okay to have relationship standards and needs regarding time and personal space, but it needs to be communicated effectively and respected by both people. Finding the right partner who shares similar needs for space and personal time is important. While the "man cave" gets a l…
/r/MensRights29/12/21 05:21 PM
1

What do you feel are the most important topics? That will depend on the nation and person impacted. I think it is critical to look at "importance" at a national level. The ranking of needs for men in India will have a different order than men in the US. For me, equality in educational opportunity is a top priority that I am pushing for in the US because it has impacted me directly and I am very familiar with the issues. To me, this means educational programs do not gender their content explicitl…
/r/MensRights27/12/21 04:25 PM
1

Education (Men make up around 40% of college students, yet there are still countless women only scholarships and programs) 2% of gender based scholarships are for men in the US despite men being a smaller minority than women were when Title IX was passed. This is not something that can change without a change to the law itself (or the funds running out of money). I support a total ban on gendered scholarships.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 04:12 PM
3

Thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/21 03:07 PM
7

Not at all. Basically anyone who pays taxes in the US has standing for a complaint. It sounds strange, but technically what you are complaining about is misuse of government funds. I have never had OCR ask if I pay taxes. I have had them ask if I was personally discriminated against or not, but that is not a case blocker, it would just change the flavor a bit. I have a US address and that seems to be enough for OCR. Even if I didn't, OCR can open investigations on their own as a result of someon…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/21 03:24 PM
1

Great work. One of the major challenges for Title IX is a loophole created by a court case that permitted gender based language in titles and program descriptions. OCR has used this to allow all gender based language in titles an descriptions, even if it describes illegal content. Case law only seems to support that gender based language is okay when it describes legal content like "mens basketball team." It doesn't support "women's coding" which refers to the gender of the participants when the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/21 02:21 AM
16

I contribute to equality by filing complaints against sexist programs with the office of civil rights in the USA. I write politicians and various positions within the government of the state where the issue is located. Title IX should ban sex based discrimination in education and remove the conditional of the entity needing to take federal funding. We also need either explicit language added to the law or a court ruling establishing precedent that bans the use of gendered language (referring to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/21 10:29 PM
2

Maybe they will, maybe not. But it can be done without revealing your name to the company. More cases related to men hitting their desk helps change perception of what people care about, even if they don't take it. Them not taking it feels like a loss to you, but you submitting is a win for everyone who comes after you. At the state level it is hit and miss. Depends on who is in the office and your state politics. I've had some who really care about this kind of stuff. Others won't even reply to…
/r/MensRights16/12/21 05:14 PM
2

Report it to the state labor board and AG for using training materials that perpetuate and rely on sex stereotypes. Idk why people report it to HR. They are there to protect the company from you, not you from the company.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 02:00 PM
3

I've ranted about this before, but seeing it again recently, I'm really at a breaking point with this. I've found that being an activist helps with these feelings. I know we had some DM's before and you were looking to do some activist work. I suggest giving it a shot and see if it helps you feel like things are more in control. Feeling like you are helping, no matter how small, can have a big impact on mental health. If you ever need someone to vent to, hit me up. I can't solve your problems bu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/21 04:58 PM
1

Is honest discussion of inactavist concepts bannable? Is criticizing the mutilation of children's genitals hate speech because it portrays a tradition of a "protected" religion in a bad light?
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:24 PM
1

Regarding case dismissals? Good fucking luck. 90% of important info will be redacted and the dismissals won't contain anything useful for making these arguments. Remember that the dismissals are bullshit and don't contain substance, which is the crux of the problem. A bullshit case being dismissed and a valid one will look the same. You will see "dismissed per section 108 (a,b,c etc) of the CPM" and won't get to see any of the supporting docs someone gave. You could request those things as well,…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:49 PM
4

Nice to see law firms advocating for men under Title IX. Usually all I hear is "we dont take these kinds of cases." This is a big deal because OCR is so political. It is prudent to get specific rulings in court that can be referenced to force action by OCR. This is good news. I am interested in what angle they will take on Title IX. The do correctly call out that OCR stating a defense is not the same as OCR stating a requirement of compliance. It looks like the school attempting to produce parit…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 06:16 PM
1

Idk much about your politics and government structure, but writing politicians is always helpful. Even if they are dismissive, it matters. Getting voices heard is the first step. The more people that get loud the harder it is to ignore. Activism is easy when the world cheers you on. It is harder, but no less important, when they do the opposite.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 05:06 PM
2

Lets take a look at 34 CFR 106, which informs recipients of the department of education funding (and only dept of education funding) on what strings are attached. This section of law obviously implicates Title IX which applies to all federal funding, but it goes a bit further in some places that is worth noting when it comes to dept of education funding. Particularly 34 CFR 106.4(a)) General. Every application for Federal financial assistance shall as condition of its approval contain or be acco…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:19 PM
4

Hijacking top comment to make a plug. Filing Title IX complaints at a federal level is free and does not require an attorney. Anyone can file against a discriminatory program, even if you don't even go to the school. Feel free to hit me up or pop into my sub for in depth discussion of Title IX through an MRA lens. It is possible to take action against this stuff in the USA. We need more people getting active on Title IX to see real change.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 03:56 PM
2

If you are in the USA and the school administration is doing sexist shit, consider filing a Title IX complaint at the federal level. It is free and no attorney is required. It isn't hard. You will need a parent signature if you are under 18.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 03:29 PM
3

My filing against 5 schools running a new single sex (women only) scholarship/internship is proceeding in an interesting way. I am 90% sure this is an illegal dismissal attempt on jurisdictional grounds. OCR tried to kick it to FSA despite it clearly being an OCR case and unrelated to FSA. After a bit of OCR and FSA making me play middleman I copied both and told them to have a call and sort it out, then I referenced that OCR has internal filing codes for single sex scholarship cases and they do…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/21 03:23 PM
2

All of this documentation can lead to legal action against the OCR for their anti-male bias, especially if you can find similar circumstances that they shut down, now and in the past. Indeed. If only there were people filing a lot of cases and collecting all the anti-male bias and poor application of law and standards in order to set up a national image of bias across all of OCR's offices. 🤔 Dismissals are not public other than through FOIA and even then..... so it's hard to make this issue see …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 05:07 PM
6

Same mentality is used by women who say men cannot be oppressed because something about power and some other BS. There is a lot of power in the justice department and society thinking you are basically incapable of committing certain crimes. Being above the law (because it won't be applied to you) is a massive privilege. It blows my mind that society can see this along racial lines but not gender lines. I've lived in places where I got to see it fall along racial lines first hand. Lack of enforc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/21 07:35 PM
12

I was excited to see how they handled this appeal and my arguments regarding sex-based descriptions needing to describe legal content. If it describes illegal content either the event is illegal or the actions which align in bias with the description are illegal (since they are attempts to produce an illegal program). OCR simply ignored my argument and didn't comment when they dismissed my appeal. I guess it is time for me to write politicians again. OCR should not be allowed to ignore component…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/21 04:25 PM
262

Are you in the USA? File a federal Title IX for the school's failure to provide bathroom facilities to all genders. If you are under 18 you will need a parent signature. It is free and can be filed online in a couple of minutes without an attorney.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 02:25 PM
2

The rooms honestly fulfill different purposes for different groups. Not according to Title IX and civil rights law in the USA!
/r/MensRights08/12/21 04:27 PM
3

Are you in the USA? File a Title IX for the school's failure to provide comparable bathroom facilities. If you are under 18 you will need a parent signature. It is free and can be filed without online in a couple of minutes without an attorney.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 04:25 PM
1

Currently, OCR is trying as hard as possible not to take the case. They keep trying to give it to FSA. FSA kicked it back and they tried to kick it to FSA again. Lmfao. It's clearly an OCR case. They literally have issue codes for single sex scholarship cases. Idk what the fuck FSA has to do with this and OCR has so far been unable to articulate it. This isn't a federal scholarship so why is OCR kicking it to FSA? This is an issue of the schools partnership with a sexist program and accepting / …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 12:32 AM
3

I donate to them! Great group making moves and engaging in real legal action.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 08:27 PM
4

Come over to r/MRA_TITLEIX and start getting active filing Title IX complaints. It's not an end-all but it is a place to get active if you want to. While the question of when men will get active is a good one, the first questions is if you are active. If not, why not? What can be done to change that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/21 07:17 PM
6

On paper they have similar rights,mostly. To add to this key point, in the USA OCR is incredibly bias in handling of mens cases. They issue dirty dismissals to strawman they set up on the case. I just had OCR spend 1.5 years reviewing a big case of mine and they dismissed it without a single legal reference as informing their decision to dismiss. They failed to address many critical aspects of the case because it is impossible to address them and dismiss the case. Rather than take the case, they…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:37 PM
4

You don't seem informed on what AA is. AA must be to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in a program by persons of a particular sex at a particular institution. On top of this, Title IX actually has its own AA-like provision that goes a bit further and requires AA-like actions to take place by the school. Thus a school that is promoting women in programs when 40% of the people are attending are men, might be in violation of CFR 106.4(a) whereby they are req…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 12:03 AM
21

Except it is at play. Educational institutions engage in overt sex-based discrimination that is pro-women and OCR does nothing. For example this Or the other million examples like techtonica, hackbright, or MIT womens cohort. I just had OCR dismiss a case I had where a school had women only educational classes, mentoring programs, engineering teams etc. I had express statements of discrimination and evidence going back 5 years on demographics being all female. OCR didn't provide a single legal c…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:39 PM
2

I've been watching for decades and typically any man's Title IX complaint would simply be dismissed as 'without merit'. Jokes on them. I love filing paperwork. Filing appeals on appeals to complaints against process on a case is what I live for.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 02:52 AM
25

Kenneth Marcus was really good for men. Ignore the ties to trump admin for a moment and consider what the person did. OCR did some good in ruling a few single sex programs, like school summer camps, as violations. This paved the way for others to file. Now that Catherine Lhamon is back it's all gone downhill and they are issuing dirty dismissals again. Under the current OCR they dismissed a big case of mine which took over a year and a senior attorney. Didn't even reference a single shred of the…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 04:31 PM
9

We could start by actually enforcing civil rights law for men in the US. There are a lot of educational programs that illegally discriminate based on sex. We could start by holding OCR's feet to the fire and getting them to actually enforce the law. I'm like 90% sure the current director (since oct) told them to dismiss mens cases and find a reason. I've had a couple dirty dismissals since then that are real head scratchers. I sent a complaint to the DOJ IG and I'm filing meta complaints with OC…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 02:27 PM
1

Document everything. Talk to a lawyer. Consider filing an eeoc charge if you feel up to it. It's free and doesn't require an attorney, although you may want one. There are time limits on filing and if you don't file it can severely limit (or outright destroy) your options in civil court.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 07:27 PM
4

My goal is to file at least three title ix complaints per weekend. If anyone has suggestions for a program to file against drop a link to it (DMs are fine) and I'll check it out. Sometimes people close to a program might not want to file out of fear of retaliation. I can't file on your behalf, but I can file on my own behalf. If anyone wants to get involved, talk in more detail, or learn more about filing title ix complaints r/MRA_TITLEIX
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 05:34 PM
2

People have been filing Title ix complaints against schools that use this material in counseling training materials. It's illegal and if it is happening you can do something about it. It's free to file with the federal office of civil rights and doesn't require an attorney.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 04:09 PM
2

You can check out the sub I run. It is new and small but it has a lot of Title ix related info. Title ix is a US law that prohibits discrimination based on sex in educational programs that take federal financial assistance. While the law itself is not bias in description, it is bias in application. Consider Verizon taking $400million in relief from the federal government then making a women-only scholarship and internship program then partnering it with five universities that take federal fundin…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 09:26 PM
3

So get active. If you are in the USA and want to do something about it, check out my sub. Ping me with questions if you got 'em. I'm trying to get more men in the USA to flex their Title IX rights by sharing my resources and stories (and hoping others share theirs), also having discussions about cases.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:42 AM
12

Then make your voice heard. File title ix complaints if you are in the USA. It's easy to take an hour or two to file each weekend. After you do it the first time it is really easy. It's free and an attorney is not required. r/MRA_TITLEIX for discussion and resources. Feel free to ping me on stuff.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 11:40 PM
1

The 3k mark is likely a reversal. ~$500 is typical for a quick 15min snip trip including followup lab service.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 12:42 AM
6

If anyone in US wants to get active instead of just doomscrolling I run a Title IX activism sub. It's free to file complaints and you don't need an attorney.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 05:37 PM
15

THEY have the burden of proof and it's for a prior claim! Why are we letting that slide? This is the problem. OCR is supposed to investigate cases with a reasonable basis. It is not supposed to require a rock-solid full-press legal argument to pick up a case. They are supposed to say "yea that might be discrimination going on" and open an investigation. OCR will not do this for men. This is something that changed with the administration and as the cases are rolling in we are seeing it. I've had …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 02:04 AM
13

Yup. Let me explain what OCR is doing to fuck around and not enforce civil rights for men. There are two types of discrimination besides retaliation. Disparate treatment (DT) and disparate impact (DI). DT is when you treat people differently based on sex. This is intent based. For a DT argument you either need to show intent (hard) or you need to show a prima facie example of someone being denied on the basis of sex. DI is when you have neutral policies that disproportionately impact people of o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 01:31 AM
26

Not just colleges. If the treasury dept provides subsidized funding to Verizon, then Verizon's educational programs and pipelines are all covered by Title IX. Filing a TIX complaint with the treasury forces the treasury to either make Verizon correct action or pull funding. Title IX applies to more than just schools. The reason I say this is that these kinds of companies fund a lot of sexist educational programs. If you attack their funding sources as being illegally given (due to TIX violations…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:31 PM
34

So file federal Title IX complaints against the programs. In the US the taxpayer is a grieved party if the government provides assistance to a company or school that discriminates education based on sex. It's free and no attorney is required.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:19 PM
2

Can't think if anyone in the national limelight within the USA. In terms of organizations, the federal office of civil rights will take action on mens issues, but it takes people filing complaints. Those complaints need to be crafted right since they don't exactly go out of their way for them..... but they do take them.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:53 PM
4

I started a sub for discussing Title IX through an MRA lens. We talk about public cases in the news, resolutions, our own cases, how to file complaints etc. It's an activism sub to get more people in the USA involved with flexing their rights.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:42 PM
2

Thanks mate!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/21 12:47 AM
3

Will do. I have a post about it made to my sub, you can read what I filed there. I wanted to post about it here too but there are some account age / karma issues I am working out since this account is new.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/21 07:35 PM
3

If you are in the USA do not place fliers in mail boxes. They are for official postal use only. If you didn't pay postage and send through usps you can get in some legal trouble.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 07:29 PM
1

Filing complaints with the feds is easier than you think. It is free and you are not required to have an attorney. Once you do it once or twice its easy to know what needs to be done to file. The more activists that start filing against programs like this, the faster we will see change.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 07:10 PM
21

Filing complaints with the feds is easier than you think. It is free and you are not required to have an attorney. Once you do it once or twice its easy to know what needs to be done to file. The more activists that start filing against programs like this, the faster we will see change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/21 06:37 PM
9

Ask yourself. Does Verizon take federal financial assistance? Does the agency receiving the funds from the students take ffa? If either is true, this is illegal and you can file a Title ix against them with OCR for free with no attorney. In short this scholarship is almost certainly illegal. edit: I filed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/21 03:23 AM
2

Consider filing an eeoc complaint. It's free and doesn't require an attorney.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 12:04 AM
5

I want to raise awareness about the denial of educational opportunities on the basis of sex (using the USA civil rights definition which means sex, sexual orientation and gender identity). There is something you can do about it if you are in the USA and I ask that you give it a go this weekend. Men are 40% of the people in college. Yet get 2% of the single-sex scholarships, no massive educational pipelines etc. There is an ongoing racket where companies hire from discriminating education program…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/21 03:10 AM
3

With all of this evidence, is it time we rethink how we treat people, specially boys, in our educational system? Indeed it is. If anyone in the USA wants to file a Title IX complaint let me know. The post in profile has many resources. It isn't a perfect solution, but it is a step in the right direction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/21 03:10 PM
5

Title IX based activism is easier than most think. If you are in the USA and want to get involved check out the post in my profile. Feel free to DM or ping me anytime someone might be wanting to file a Title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 02:21 PM
3

The national coalition for men has a lot of resources you might find useful.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 01:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter