TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MRB2012 Archive

View 6 posts and 1,697 comments by MRB2012 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,697 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

That's why I said moralism is inappropriate. We're not here to discuss YOUR values, which you arbitrarily assign. We are here to discuss objective, social or sexual value. Criminals have no social value, that's why they're criminals.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 12:30 AM
8

No, they didn't. You don't just walk up to people and go, "Hi I'm a therapist, all relationship problems stem from the male not being good enough, have you met my friend? He's also a therapists, he will tell you the exact same thing," This was apart of a conversation, more than likely two different conversations, more than likely conversations you had while in a therapy session. Not that there's anything wrong with that. How did this part of the conversation come about? Perhaps they suggested he…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 07:59 PM
3

She is afraid of guns in her lectures when any 14 year old boy who is tired of being called a misogynist can easily choke her to death. There haven't been any mass stranglings that I know of.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 07:24 AM
1

Right, weak obnoxious men need to pay strong men to protect them so they can mouth off to aggressive men It's a lot better than having aggressive idiots kill people for perceived slights.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 02:32 AM
2

Aggressive protectors who will kill or die for you dont leave their aggression at the door most of the times, many learn to temper it, but no weedy queer is going to lecture them on a train in condescending tones and not wind up learning something about themselves, If you're the kind of guy who beats up "weedy queers" for mouthing off, you're the kind of guy the cops protect the rest of us from.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 01:57 AM
2

Keep in mind that hitting women, fighting to impress women, catcalling, assaulting gay men, etc can all easily fall under that umbrella So was beating or killing people who insulted you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:51 AM
3

Do you think any protective man must be a testosterone driven brute? Testosterone driven? Probably. Brutish? Not necessarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:47 AM
0

Do you have any conception what kind of man puts his life on the line for strangers for a living? Do you think thats a gentle man who listens to some lisping queer boss him around on a train? Quite often it is. You don't need to be an arrogant douche to be a cop.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:46 AM
3

What makes Angry Jack the bad guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:45 AM
-1

She kills someone and gets a lousy 90 days in jail? She killed someone by mistake.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 10:04 AM
6

You know, like a history of violence towards white men, led by non-white women. Kebabs do have a history of violence towards whites.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:28 PM
1

Jeyne was tasked with nursing him while he was delirious with fever, presumably on opium, and emotionally distraught. She screwed him.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 07:41 PM
3

Was I the only one who thought that Theon looked so tortured watching Sansa getting lanced because he couldn't get an erection? He was watching a girl who was basically his sister get brutally raped by the guy who cut off his dick.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:30 PM
4

I... seriously need someone to explain how Sansa was 'raped'. I'd ask somewhere else, but am pretty sure my comment would be removed in a hurry. She never said 'no' anywhere in her scenes at the end of the episode. She DID say yes... "I take this man." She got pimped out to him by Littlefinger.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:30 PM
2

Robb was raped in the books.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:29 PM
-2

Who cares about a lousy remake of an old action movie?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:56 AM
1

Here's their PR department.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:36 PM
1

Contact their PR department.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:35 PM
1

Contact their PR department. Be civil, but express your opinion.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:31 PM
5

Here's their PR department.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:16 PM
3

Their PR department can be reached here. She'll be really sorry when she's unemployed.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:15 PM
0

Never mind, our society is in fact a free for all against black masculinity.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:52 PM
0

Attacking black masculinity Feminists are just about the only people in our society who don't attack black masculinity.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 10:38 AM
0

But you don't really, not in terms of all spending. You're not allowed to vote?
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:14 AM
0

By that logic, I have as much control over government as I do over my gun-toting neighbor, Slightly more actually.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:16 AM
0

I vote against taxes, they still steal my money every payday. I fought off a mugger, he didn't get any of my money and went to jail for trying. I doubt that. Self defense is legal under US law.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:35 PM
1

We vote.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:24 PM
1

Your own logic states otherwise. You have influence over the people that are near you Not when you're being mugged.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:14 PM
1

Then you have just as much say in what you neighbor does with your money. You have less say in that than you do in government.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:10 AM
1

You have a say in government (as much as you do in anything else). You have no say in robbery.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:01 AM
0

You really don't though.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:58 AM
0

You have as much say in government as you do in anything else.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:56 AM
0

Control is a very faint illusion. So what?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:52 AM
1

If your needy neighbor came over and put a gun to your head, and threatened to lock you in his basement or shoot you unless you gave him $100, he'd be locked up. Yet when they government does this for him by proxy, it's somehow a legitimate use of government force. You have a say in what the government does, you do not have a say in what your neighbor does.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:27 AM
9

There's a disturbing number of smart people like that.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:24 AM
3

You could argue one way or the other about white masc. in college, but there isn't an overwhelming black masc. culture in colleges Aside from black frats. And you know, athletics.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:23 AM
2

Here's her Rate My Professor page. She's as terrible as you'd expect.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 11:15 PM
4

Here's is their PR team's contact information. Email them. Have your friends email them. The solution to hate speech is more speech.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 11:13 PM
1

There's no meaningful punishment for their actions, so they can do whatever they want.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 11:07 PM
3

As is his modeling career, unfortunately. Depends on how bad it is. You could cover it up with makeup.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:52 AM
0

This division did a "full" investigation? I just did the same, by watching that video, but of course they MUST take the claim seriously because woman would never lie about it. It's better to be certain. You really don't want a rapist on your police force, do you?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:53 AM
5

He probably wouldn't have. Police departments know that cops get falsely accused of sex crimes.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:52 AM
0

Because she had very good chances at succeeding. She did succeed.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:26 AM
4

Messaging them telling them to fuck off after they've deleted your post? What did you expect to happen?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:18 AM
5

Post was removed. I sent a modmail with the, admittedly poor title "oh fuck off". Where I'm used to talking, this isn't particularly offensive. It's equivalent to "come on now". And I was then perma-banned immediately. So you insulted the mods after they removed a post.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:43 AM
2

Are they wandering around holding a power drill in one hand and their feelings in the other, confused as to how and when to use either of them? You use one on feminists and the other when watching sad movies. Duh.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:03 PM
2

Walk a mile in her shoes. You support women by walking in their shoes. Female soldiers run around in high heels all the time?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:10 AM
4

Isn't debtors prison supposed to be illegal? Debtor's prison is illegal. The courts can, however, throw you in jail for refusing to obey court orders.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:49 PM
1

I like to say it this way: If you think the women who stayed home suffer more than a man who died in combat, In many of history's wars, staying home was no defense.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 04:16 AM
1

The beauty of the internet means you can check it out yourself in seconds. Well let's look at what you said about it. Red Pill is more than a reddit it's more than sociosexual dynamics, and it's more than awareness of sociopolitical issues, and actual, practical coping strategy. Yeah, that's a cult.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:03 PM
6

Red Pill is more than a reddit it's more than sociosexual dynamics, and it's more than awareness of sociopolitical issues, and actual, practical coping strategy. It's a cult? Because that's what I'm hearing.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:35 AM
0

Storming a building is the absolute last resort for a SWAT team.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 08:23 PM
1

As I understand it, those types of recourses are incredibly difficult. The "logic" being that actual rape victims would be discouraged from coming forward if they were likely to be sued. It's also very hard to prove that someone was lying, which makes it hard to convict someone of perjury.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:17 AM
6

Contact the provost and tell him how you feel.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:13 AM
2

You can't do anything to sex traffickers that's worse than what they do to each other.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 07:58 AM
5

2) You can’t report prison rape to the police, because the authorities tend to ignore you. In some cases, the perpetrator of prison rape is actually one of the guards. It's more than some cases.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:06 AM
1

Who was the author of this article?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:22 PM
1

I sense federal charges.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:18 PM
1

How can we be sure he was unarmed? We have the video!
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:16 PM
2

Men gain status through being talented Who needs status?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 07:42 AM
1

Hildegard von Bingen.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 07:41 AM
-1

By whom outside Objectivists like me? She is universally reviled by feminists and academics. And decent people everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 07:40 AM
3

I would rather have a reputation for apologizing and repairing my mistakes than whatever reputation for staying on the wrong course. She won't get a reputation for staying on the wrong course, she'll be praised for heroically fighting rape.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 06:17 PM
2

The only "nonPC" thing about Captain America is that he's a Christian. Which is sadly enough to send SJWs into fits.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:54 AM
1

Remember guys, if the woman is pretty enough she can savagely butcher your worthless male ass, then get 3 hots and a cot until some judge decides to grant her parole. Even if she's not pretty she can do that. Almost no murderers actually get the death penalty.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:56 PM
0

Less than 5% of murders get the death penalty. It's not surprising that Arias was spared.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:55 PM
7

I've heard a lot a talk of that back during slavery a lot of white women raped black slaves through the threat of crying rape White women did rape black men. Frequently. For some reason people don't talk about it.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:52 PM
3

A convicted indian rapist recently said is was her fault for being out after 9. He's also on death row, so apparently that excuse doesn't work even in India.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:25 PM
2

Saying "Women are physically different than men, therefore they have to compete in different divisions" is no different to saying "White Europeans are physically different than Black Kenyans, therefore they have to compete in different divisions." Whites and blacks don't have different chromosomes.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:24 PM
3

There's going to be a real backlash one day, and I don't think she'll like it.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:54 PM
-9

This will end when a white woman falsely accuses a black man of rape. Americans won't stand up for black men.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:32 PM
10

Hitting someone who is no longer a threat to you is assault.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:14 AM
5

I'm thinking they stepped on shortly after the initial chocking/hitting and only saw the guy attacking her unprovoked. If there's a fight, the cops grab everybody. They sort it out once the punching stops.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:13 AM
11

David Wong hates women, he just pretends that other people have his issues.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:29 PM
2

That's 8 who have publicly declared that they hate the foundations of our legal system. They needn't ever live it down.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:37 AM
4

If women didn't want abortions, they wouldn't have them.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 06:03 AM
7

That would be ridiculous. But slave owners really did claim slavery benefited slaves. Feminists really do claim that they love men, even as they sob about "rape culture."
/r/MensRights23/02/15 10:43 AM
2

It's like telling the kids you're going to disney world, and then taking them to the dentist. It's deceit to win favor, and then deliver into the open arms of doom. Of course, taking the kids to the dentist is actually good for them.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 10:40 AM
2

Could it possibly be that men's perspectives actually matter, and women have become less marriage-worthy due to obesity, Skrillez-haircuts, tattoos and inflated sense of self-worth? Are women that much more likely than men to be obese?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/15 10:11 AM
16

Title is pretty clear. As much as TBP sidebar would have you believe, all tactics employed by TRP are clearly consensual. On the other hand, Roosh literally wants to legalize rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/15 10:09 AM
14

She's an unemployable one. That's what counts.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 07:24 AM
6

Actions have consequences.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 07:13 AM
0

Good riddance to bad rubbish.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 04:54 AM
3

No, he really did say actual rape should be legal on private property.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 08:31 AM
2

Exactly. The law is not the only form of power.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:53 AM
6

Just glancing at the pictures all i see is ugly fat chicks. As Dennis Reynolds would say.. 'Don't worry, you certainly wouldn't be in any danger'. Following in Dworkin's footsteps.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:50 AM
5

The horror of this situation is that these laws cannot be used against women. The laws can't, but social consequences can.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:30 AM
1

And if their big hero wasn't a fascist.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:36 PM
12

Character assassination is not a crime in the US.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:31 PM
2

One wonders what would happen if someone were to falsely accuse a member of "FuckRapeCulture " of rape. Only one member?
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:29 PM
0

Sooner or later Christian groups may start defending themselves. I don't think these terrorists will like it when that day comes.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 04:08 AM
3

Are people still clinging to Sulkowicz's story?
/r/MensRights16/02/15 07:08 AM
2

There is some precedence of Thor losing his hammer for good. Future Thor makes that very explicit... the period of his wielding Mjolnir has both a beginning and end, and it's implied that the end is fairly close to "now". Not when Marvel can still make money off of old Thor. Personally, I read the Thor comics to read about Thor Odinsson... not whomever happens to have the hammer today. A female Thor does nothing for me, other than to be an obvious pander to the SJW's. If this comic continues to …
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:13 AM
2

The thing with making Thor a woman is that there is literally no need for it. There was no need for horse Thor either, but Marvel did that.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:38 AM
2

Thor was turned into a frog. A six and a half foot Viking frog of war.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:34 AM
5

Marvel does this crap all the time. There's a "new Thor" every few years. Inevitably "old Thor" gets his hammer back in a few months.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:34 AM
0

If the pattern of rising secularity and waning religious belief across the First World is any indication, it will not be too long before organized religion is a thing of the past. I wouldn't bet on it. But I actually know what I'm talking about, unlike you.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 05:15 AM
0

Did you continue reading after that part you quoted? Because I explained that I was talking about the long-term record right after that. Hitler and Stalin certainly killed a lot of people in a short period of time, which is in itself horrific, but their regimes collapsed, and their ideologies went with them. Communism and Nazism are still around. the Dark Ages, The Dark Ages never happened. they fight against the rights of women and gays at every opportunity, No, they don't. Some fight against a…
/r/MensRights14/02/15 07:40 PM
-1

I am not playing your game, you are going to pull the old mens rea argument and say it isn't a lie because there is no intent. That is the definition of a lie. It doesn't make a difference, It makes all the difference. a well meaning parent teaching their child the earth is flat is still teaching them a lie, even if it is a lie they believe and that they had no intent to teach as a lie but as the truth it is still a lie. No, it is not. You are literally too stupid to understand what a lie is.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 06:32 AM
2

It wasn't God protecting that building, just people. And what is the church?
/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:28 AM
-1

You didn't answer the question. Do you know what a lie is? Come on, I'm sure a "bright" atheist like yourself knows what a lie is.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:23 AM
-1

Yes it is, I've been there. So have I. Yes, they have. No, they have not. Are you too stupid to know what a lie is? Now, do you have proof that Christianity is true? I never claimed to.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:20 AM
0

To me, Religion is a greater threat than nationalism or any other philosophical credo, and I point to history as proof of that. There have been plenty of barbaric things done in the name of nationalism, patriotism, Communism, and even America's favorite buzzword, "freedom," but none of these instances comes even close to having the record of violence and persecutory practices that religions like Christianity and Islam do. You are wrong.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:15 AM
-1

I have been to /r/Christianity It is a hivemind of circle jerk. No it's not. I've been there. Yes, new atheists tend to be angry, they have been told a lie their entire lives No, they have not.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:13 AM
2

Put a bit of grease on the back of the posters.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 01:03 AM
0

Put a little grease on the back. Whoever tears it down will be in for a nasty surprise.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 12:59 AM
3

The "dark ages" were much fairer than this.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:19 PM
2

It's not that men should just hope for the best case scenario. They must work for the (according to RP and RPW) best case scenarios. TRP says if you work out, better yourself, etc. you can live your life this way. If you won the genetic lottery perhaps. But otherwise you will start to look your age when you're 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 10:25 PM
3

They're misogynists who project their issues onto others.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:12 PM
2

If she tries to kill me, she's not going to jail. I'm going to jail.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:25 PM
2

The thing is he's not confessing. No one is saying that he shot anybody. They're saying that because he profits from music about violence, he should go to prison.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 08:16 PM
10

AFALT.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 01:33 PM
1

A crazy kid did something crazy.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 01:16 PM
2

What has Keith Richards ever done to them?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 01:48 PM
1

They did not ask the female to present papers. They didn't get around to that part.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 01:42 AM
1

Going to is irrelevant. There were two officers to start, proper procedure would have been to interrogate and/or detain both suspects simultaneously with one officer assisting the other if one suspect resisted. Which is what they did.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 01:26 AM
1

What makes you think they weren't going to?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 01:00 AM
-1

Why does it matter? Because war crimes are bad. Now stop being a coward and answer the question. Are you going to question your CO and the intelligence info he has? I might. What's he asking me to do? Do you want to face a court marshall? Do you mean a "court martial?"
/r/MensRights19/01/15 05:04 PM
0

Read the article again. Roughly 34% of all prisoners in the U.S. are incarcerated for victimless crimes. The real number is much lower, as "public order offenses" are in no way victimless.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 05:03 PM
0

What makes you think they only suspected the male?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:59 PM
0

It is not your role to question my orders If you order me to commit war crimes, it is. I gave you a target and you have to kill it. That depends on who the target is. Now stop being a coward and tell me, who is the target?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:59 PM
0

But you are a soldier now. You have to obey my orders. Not if they're clearly unlawful. You didn't know that?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:37 PM
0

You didn't even bother read it, did you? Roughly 34% of all prisoners in the U.S. are incarcerated for victimless crimes. Now I know this is difficult for you, but 34 is less than 50. That means that most prisoners are in for hurting people. Also, "public order offenses" are often not victimless crimes. Here's a brief list of things that are "public order" offenses. Shining a laser in a pilot's eyes. Planting a fake bomb Filing a false police report Rioting Interfering with medical services Hara…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:35 PM
0

Why does it matter? I might not be inclined to round up Jews or Armenians.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:31 PM
0

Someone else. Who? Lightly armed people who are trying to kill me?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:24 PM
0

We are talking about law enforcement which includes victimless crimes. Most people who go to jail do so for hurting others.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:23 PM
0

You haven't answered my question. In this hypothetical scenario, who do you want me to shoot? Someone else. Such as?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:21 PM
0

We're not discussing autobots either. No, we're discussing criminals. Criminals are known to hurt people.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:10 PM
0

Who is it?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:10 PM
-1

So if I give you a costume, a gun, a salary and a target - can you go kill the target for me please? Who is this "target?" Is it a heavily armed group of people who are also trying to kill me? Because I'm OK with that.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:05 PM
0

We're not just discussing victimless crimes.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:01 PM
-1

Does all morality stop when somebody gives you a costumes, a gun, a salary and a target? Of course not. You can still be prosecuted for war crimes. However, shooting other soldiers is not a war crime. It's just war.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:00 PM
-1

If soldiers were not forced to fight (as they are currently), then it would be their choice to join others in murder. Shooting at other soldiers in a time of war isn't murder. That's sort of the point.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:54 PM
0

Do you understand the terms "rape," "murder," and "arson?"
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:52 PM
0

ugh? wtf? It's pretty simple. Some people like hurting others. We call these people "criminals." Society disapproves of their actions, so it has people called "police" whose job it is to hunt down "criminals" and bring them to justice. In some cultures, "justice" meant "being tortured to death." We Americans are nice, so we prefer to just put you in prison.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:45 PM
-2

It's clear you don't understand argumentation nor logic. Let me explain this to you. Suppose the penalty for fighting in an unjust war was death. This would mean that anyone who lost a war would be executed (because victors will never declare themselves unjust). With that knowledge, no army would ever surrender.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:42 PM
0

But they are not cowards. And most cops aren't sociopaths, fortunately for us all.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:40 PM
0

I don't think you understand the term law enforcement then. I do. There's a lot of laws. How is caging people for victimless crimes "protecting" them? How many people did has Charles Manson killed recently?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:39 PM
1

They'll all in the same business: law enforcement No they are not. The DEA enforces drug laws. Highway patrols protect highways. The FBI fights terrorism. Those are all radically different jobs. (which is different to protecting people by the way). No, it's not.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:34 PM
2

Not sure what you are talking about. German soldiers were shot on the spot if they did not go into battle. Same for the allies. See WWI trench warfare for example. Precisely. Soldiers aren't responsible for determining whether a national cause is just. Wars would be a lot less frequent if soldiers were not shot (or imprisoned) for deserting or disobeying orders. If soldiers were shot for losing as you propose, wars would be even bloodier than they already are. You're not too dumb to understand t…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:32 PM
0

Interesting poll. Thanks for the link. So what was that about me having to be a cop? Also not sure how "small business" can be one entity. How can the police be one entity?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:29 PM
-1

Exactly. That's what I said: thugs with guns Also known as "authority figures." Watch the video I linked to. you might enjoy it People who run towards violence are not cowards.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:28 PM
2

Yes! We could avoid things like WWI and WWII. How? Hanging the soldiers after the war isn't going to stop the war from having happened. It's just going to make people mad and provoke more violence.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:27 PM
-1

You mean the bombing of weddings? Or the raping or prisoners?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 02:44 PM
4

Well it should. Why should it be illegal to fight in an unjust war? Should we just allow soldiers to choose whether or not they turn up? It's not because somebody gives you a costume, a gun and a salary that it entitled you to go around murdering people. The law recognizes that soldiers are not responsible for determining whether a war is just or not. The people we elect to make laws are. The generals who plan the wars are. The kids whose options are "obey or be shot" are not. Are you able to un…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 02:32 PM
0

They are just thugs with guns And legal authority, which makes them authority figures. and cowards too. They're generally not cowardly. Quite the opposite.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 02:31 PM
-1

Only a cop would write this. Only an idiot would write this. Madness Wrong. The only institutions we trust more than the cops are the military and small business.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 02:30 PM
-4

Oh look, another idiot who doesn't understand the law. It's not illegal to fight in an unjust war. That's why we didn't charge every single German soldier with war crimes.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 12:53 PM
-1

And they had that.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 11:28 AM
6

In the US domestic calls are high priority, especially if a weapon is involved.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 11:01 AM
1

Lots of DV victims care for their attackers and do not wish to hurt them.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 10:59 AM
-1

They need more than just a desire to investigate to demand a person's name, Like someone calling and saying that a child was being beaten?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 10:57 AM
-1

Call about DV. It is not reasonable to suspect only the male. It's reasonable to investigate.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 10:49 AM
-1

And even then, the police have to have "reasonable suspicion". Like a call about a fight?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 10:40 AM
-2

I'm not going to argue the clearly written opinion of the Hiibel case with you. Because you are wrong. The man protested that he had no reason to provide identification, and became ill-tempered when the deputy continued to press him for his identification. The man then asked the deputy what crime he was being accused of, as the deputy continued his requests for identification, stating that he was “conducting an investigation”. The man persisted in his refusal to provide identification, asking in…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 08:16 AM
-1

Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 has said that demanding name disclosure does not violate the 4th amendment but that demanding identification does. Wrong. Hiibel was arrested after refusing to identify himself, his arrest was upheld by the Supreme Court.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 08:09 AM
-1

You have a constitutional right to wander around the landscape without identification. And the police have constitutional authority to investigate crimes. States do not get to violate that. The judicial system determines what the police are allowed to do, and they have held that stop and identify statutes are perfectly legal.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:43 AM
-1

Constitutional. States get to make their own rules.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:35 AM
-6

Because cops are public servants. They need to lose this conceit that they are some kind of authority figure They in fact are authority figures. Same goes for resisting arrest- if it's a bogus charge, there should not be any penalty for resisting an unlawful arrest. You are allowed to resist an unlawful arrest. Resisting a lawful one, however, is both illegal and quite dangerous. I seriously doubt that. And you are wrong. We trust cops more than we trust anyone but small business and the militar…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:34 AM
-1

False. They can request ID, just as any citizen can request anything from any other citizen. In most states they can demand a positive affirmation of a person's name, but that doesn't translate into demanding physical evidence. Depends on the state.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:29 AM
-2

And if they do investigate it, they don't completely bungle the investigation Are you familiar with the name "OJ Simpson?" Another difference between me and cops? I don't undergo training programs where I learn how to torture people and violate their civil rights in ways I will never be held accountable for. Either you live in Saudi Arabia or you're lying. Which is it?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:03 AM
-1

Unless he's driving, then asking for id is not lawful. They can ask his name, to which in some states he is required to respond, but asking for a physical identification is not a legitimate request of an officer, again unless the person is driving. Not exactly. The police can demand ID if they have reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed. In this case they did.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:01 AM
-2

I can't find the link at the moment but no other police force in a first world country manages to kill even a tiny fraction of a fraction of the civilians that police in the USA do. E.G. from the UK where I am... The US also has a lot more violent crime than other first world countries. So why to the cops in the states manage to kill so many people? People in other countries don't try to kill cops.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 06:59 AM
1

Not really. There are over 10,000 law enforcement agencies in the US. They all do their own thing.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 06:58 AM
-5

"I'm going home to my family no matter what." Seriously, that about sums it up. In a lot of states the police only have to claim they were in fear for their life- independent of any actual reason to be in fear for their life- and they probably won't even be charged. No, they don't. They have to show that the fear they had was reasonable and the force they use has to be reasonable. So long as they can do that they don't get charged. It is most definitely NOT a line of thought that should ever eve…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 06:58 AM
-1

I continue to marvel at American police. Wtf is wrong with your country? Americans unlike other westerners are dumb enough to fight the cops.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 06:55 AM
-1

Hiding behind "procedure" is just another Nuremberg defense. The Nuremberg defense generally speaking is valid. Procedure is a justification for soldiers to do their jobs, it's just not a justification for them to commit war crimes.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 06:54 AM
1

Said terrorists then killed a woman. So yeah, they were also liars.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 10:58 AM
4

Which is not a bad reaction when there's a crazed terrorist threatening people with a shotgun.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:49 PM
7

They still have the option of suing Rolling Stone.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:16 PM
68

Rolling Stone publishes the story. And in doing so commits libel.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 05:47 AM
7

Do they give common sense awards?
/r/MensRights14/01/15 02:03 AM
25

Protocol for crazy people with shotguns is "RUN AWAY!" They were just following protocol.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:11 PM
1

I'm starting to think Pinochet was right about leftists.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:21 AM
2

We can't do that. They will always support using the mob to lynch us, but they will never accept the mob's judgment of them.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 10:57 PM
1

I laugh when I hear this. How? How am I supposed to identify the extremely rare specimen of a would-be rapist, and then stop him? Arthur Chu, by his own admission, has let rapists get away with hurting women.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 09:58 AM
1

But meanwhile, women are getting stalked and raped and killed. That’s something that men are doing and that men can stop other men from doing. And, with apologies to my fellow emotionally tortured guys, that really ought to be our priority. It is not my job to police the behavior of others. We have people whose job it is to do that, they're called "police officers."
/r/MensRights11/01/15 09:52 AM
13

Alaska doesn't have life in prison. The kid who murdered two cops last year "only" got 200 years in prison for it.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:37 PM
2

The state brings charges on behalf of its people, not at the behest of an individual. Which is good, because a guy who has raped once will rape again.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:27 AM
1

Suing will make the frats look worse.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 06:33 PM
-1

The army also wanted to give medals to the guys who drop hellfire missiles on weddings.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 10:04 AM
2

I wish the media would stop trying to drive a wedge between ISIS and Islam. The media didn't create the wedge, ISIS did.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 01:12 AM
4

So far women have done a poor job at stopping the spread of radical islam feminists included. They also did a bad job of stopping the KKK and the IRA.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 01:11 AM
1

If she knew it was a lie, she may face charges.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 06:52 AM
3

due process works along a sliding scale, proportionate to the potential harms to the accused. The simplest misdemeanor must be tried by a jury.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:37 PM
11

Chopping off heads to keep the other soldiers in line is out of Sun Tzu's time. That's over 2500 years ago. The last American was shot for desertion in 1945.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:12 PM
11

This is actually a thing, and not always considered rape. It is the fastest way to hydrate a severely dehydrated person The CIA was not using it for medical purposes.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:20 AM
1

Rebecca Watson sounds an awful lot like Dick Cheney.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 08:29 PM
1

Ms. Watson should remember that what goes around comes around.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 08:28 PM
2

He supported the Vietnam War, but never actually went to fight in it. Got himself five student deferments. He's a chickenhawk.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:35 AM
1

There is no guarantee that the next victim will be a black male The cops don't shoot women, they shoot men. They're more likely to shoot a white man than a black woman.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 09:06 PM
7

Gang raped on broken glass as part of a frat initiation? And didn't require medical attention.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:03 AM
0

Are we sure that Jackie Coakley is the same Jackie who Rolling Stone interviewed?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:02 AM
1

We don't know if Jackie Coakley is Jackie.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:37 PM
0

They could also go after anyone in the gender studies department. A quick report to the the campus police could ruin a career.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:07 AM
1

Zerlina Maxwell raped me. Stay woke. Spread the word.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:05 AM
1

What would now prevent 4 frat brothers from setting up an obvious militant feminist and claiming she raped one of them. Nothing.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:05 AM
1

Is what she did actually illegal? Maybe, but I don't know. I could potentially fall under libel I guess, but don't you need to knowingly lie for libel? If you libeled a public figure, yes. But those guys aren't public figures.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 09:32 PM
1

The part about the conspiracy really needs more attention. Jackie alleged the men had to do this to join the frat. The accusation here was of a years long conspiracy to commit serial gang rape, over and over again. The conspiracy was so organized and disciplined that not one pledge or victim ever reported it to police and only one victim was ever willing to come forward publicly. All of this at an elite and respected college, at a frat with prominent well respected members. As any historian can …
/r/MensRights07/12/14 09:30 PM
1

Zerlina Maxwell raped me. I demand that she turn herself in immediately!
/r/MensRights07/12/14 03:20 PM
6

As many as we show it to.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 09:03 PM
2

I'm starting to think politically motivated false rape accusations are the only way to get to them. That may very well be the case. I hope if that starts happening that the men doing it will be very careful to only target feminists who've been for it. That probably will not be the case.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:03 PM
4

The even admit that this is exactly what they're trying to do. To work, "Yes Means Yes" needs to create a world where men are afraid. But they still expect us to believe they don't hate us.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:37 PM
9

Good for her.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 06:56 PM
1

[email protected] That's the email address for ASU's student newspaper. If you disagree with them, let them know.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:28 AM
0

I am not a fan of Julien Blanc but he is not accused, let alone convicted, of a crime. He is barred entry for political reasons He's not a British citizen. They're not obligated to let him in.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:57 AM
0

Nations have the right to deny foreigners entry.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:55 AM
0

If they are doing that then trying to teach them to not rape will be a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/14 10:59 PM
0

Lots of rapists genuinely don't understand they did anything wrong Do you really believe that?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/14 11:11 AM
1

Look. Guys. Have you ever seen a Bruce Lee or Chuck Norris movie? If you did you saw how little this muscle mass thing relates to being an efficient fighter. It does play a role, how the hell not, but it is a fairly small part of the picture. Strength is a large part of fighting. If 1973's Chuck Norris would walk into a gym today, he would be called both weak and even fat. In turn he would probably consider those guys having mainly decorative muscles or maybe strong at carrying furniture - but n…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 01:15 AM
1

He's probably a nice guy who really did feel bad about offending people.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 01:58 PM
1

Exercise, done properly, gives you energy and increases endorphins. "Lifting" doesn't really do anything for stamina or even strength Someone tell Hafthor Bjornsson he's doing it wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/14 01:19 PM
11

According to RAINN, there are about 240,000 sexual assaults every year in the US. The population of the US is about 315 million. The population of Canada is about 35 million. That chart has no basis in reality.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 12:26 AM
20

It's hard to explain the heartbreak of "gender disappointment" and how it can consume you. Every gift - every blue babygrow and toy car - was a reminder of the fact my life wasn't going the way I planned. Part of being an adult is accepting that life doesn't always go the way you planned.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 11:39 PM
0

Consider jury nullification for all rape cases. Let them know that any attempts to punish the innocent will be resisted. The more innocent people they try to lock up, the more guilty ones we let go free.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:23 PM
1

If you can't think of any examples Those terrible police. They should just let violent criminals run free. We'd all be better off!
/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:34 AM
2

Maybe if they spent more time actually investigating those instead of stupid shit Such as?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:26 AM
1

Cops lack a hell of a lot more than "common decency." Yeah, they're so terrible. They arrest people for stupid shit like "rape" and "murder." The fascists! It's my Constitutional right to do whatever I want and suffer no consequences whatsoever.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:21 AM
3

Wait WHAT? At what point was it even necessary to shoot him? Was he threatening to leave the house with a gun or something? Most likely he aimed or fired his gun at the officers.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 04:12 PM
-6

No, it's not.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 12:34 PM
-5

When I cannot ascertain for certain that a member of an armed group is telling the truth, but know for sure that they campaigned, sued and won the right to lie to me in order to incarcerate me (whether or not the statements they make in order to do this are true), I have no choice but to assume that every single thing they say is a lie in order to preserve my own rights. You have the right to remain silent. It's there for a reason. I am hoping for the day when an officer actually arrests the agg…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 12:17 PM
-25

LE has sued for and won the right to not hire the most intelligent candidates for employment. The average cop is actually smarter than the average American. LE has sued for and won the right to not tell the truth when dealing with the public. I fail to see why that's a problem. LE has sued for and won the right not to be required to act in a manner which prevents harm to the public. Wrong. They argued that they're not responsible for defending everyone in their jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 11:23 AM
2

The bullying was in the form of someone literally praising bullying.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:58 PM
3

Except when people talk about the destructive values of black culture (such as glamorized degeneratism and thug worship), they are talking about norms. Most black men are not violent criminals.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:17 AM
1

Generally speaking, Boko Haram does not kidnap men. It kills them.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 08:56 PM
0

Why not?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 08:44 PM
34

Time to find and contact their advertisers. I doubt they want to work with people who think DV victims should be murdered.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 04:23 PM
10

Most of the ones at Cracked are male.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 04:22 PM
1

Maimonides made it 1000 guilty men.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 03:01 PM
4

Here you go.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 11:51 PM
2

It is. A poster on /r/twoxchromosomes claimed her husband doesn't believe in marital rape and that he had kissed her against her will.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 05:11 PM
10

This is not about trying to catch rapists. This is about redefining rape so that all men will be punished as rapists. Ezra Klein even admitted that this was the real point of the law.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 03:41 PM
2

For the record, the “drowning,” in this instance, wasn’t just run-of-the-mill Internet nastiness. In many cases, these women received highly graphic, disturbing threats That is run-of-the-mill internet nastiness.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 10:18 PM
1

The California law is appalling, but an alteration of social norms around fucking drunk strangers when you are drunk yourself would be good for everybody. It's not healthy behavior. Punishing innocent people is not an effective means of deterring criminals.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 07:59 AM
5

Cruelty towards innocent people does not deter criminal behavior.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 09:46 PM
7

Or a stupid kid who wanted attention.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:03 PM
4

Random assholes on the internet saying violent things are not actual threats. I don't see the police investigating XBox Live. Someone threatened to shoot up a university. That's the kind of thing the cops investigate.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:02 PM
7

Criminals already face prison for what they do. They either don't care if they get caught or think they won't get caught. Punishing innocent people won't stop them. The Yes Means Yes law could also be called the You Better Be Pretty Damn Sure law. You Better Be Pretty Damn Sure she said yes. You Better Be Pretty Damn Sure she meant to say yes, and wasn't consenting because she was scared, or high, or too tired of fighting. If you're one half of a loving, committed relationship, then you probably…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:18 PM
2

And yet, as another UVA co-ed goes missing, the conversation becomes singularly focused on examining an alleged serial rapist and killer. The media ignores that Morgan Harrington's abduction is also related to Yeardley's murder, No, they weren't. There's no evidence the two murderers or victims had ever even met. Instead, the vacuum is filled by voices like conservative columnist Camille Paglia, who chalked up Morgan's abduction to the constant nearness of savage nature -- e.g. men (at least som…
/r/MensRights09/10/14 06:05 AM
1

Lettuce quote from the book of DMX. You mean the rap sheet?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/14 02:11 AM
2

The germans were barbarians until they were Romanized At least that's what the Romans said.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 09:27 AM
2

Would you rather live in Africa, South America, or Europe given the chance? Europe. I guarantee it. They say Chile's a lovely place to live.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 08:01 AM
1

Protests aside, Hong Kong is supposedly quite nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 07:39 AM
2

That is a pretty bold claim. Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 07:35 AM
2

The Mongols were good, but they had limits.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 06:21 AM
3

Furthermore, Mongol trouncing of opponents was far more a one-sided affair than even WW2. WWII was not one sided. So, sure, they may not have ruled Europe for generations, especially with their sucession system as /u/PurplePrinciple pointed out, but to say they could not have reached and burned locations like Paris, London, and even Rome(as they were curious about the pope) is just kidding yourself. They could not have. Even if they could have reached Paris, reaching London would have been anoth…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 06:15 AM
3

If the Khan had ordered Europe to be his. Then the Khan's generals would go into Europe. And it would have ended badly for them. As we learned in WWII, belief does not ensure victory.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:37 AM
1

Irony aside. Pre-mongol invasions Europe was a terrible. Not really. Some parts were. Some weren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:27 AM
1

The dawn of non-white civilizations is that they are unstable and unmaintainable. China was old when Rome was young. Why were these supposedly glorious non-white empires so unsustainable and futile? How did a superior people get their butts kicked by the Aryan race? The Aryans are the Iranians. Not the "whites." Where are these glorious Islamic caliphates today? Whites form the basis of civilization in music, literature, sciences, mathematics, etc. Whites are particularly prominent in modern sci…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:27 AM
2

All Western civilization comes out of the Mediterranean The Germans would disagree. Basically white people dominated because of pure luck. And guns. Guns are always nice. The Persians were on track to do what the Romans couldn't and conquer the whole Western world and make it muslim At one point the Persians basically did rule the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:24 AM
1

No one race is as beautiful and diverse as whites. You see red hair, black hair, brown hair, blonde hair and blue eyes, green eyes, brown eyes, grey eyes, and hazel eyes. Middle Easterners exhibit the same traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:22 AM
2

Mongols in keeping with their tradition, would have literally decimated Europe's population. Kublai Khan's death and their uncannily cermonious succession traditions is what saved Europe. The LACK OF ATTENDENCE AT THE PARTY WHERE THEY WOULD DECIDE A SUCCESSOR TO KUBLAI KHAN IS WHY EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION WAS NOT INVADED AND LEVELED LIKE CHINA AND THE MIDDLE EAST WAS BY MONGOLS. Not necessarily. The Mongols were stretching to get as far as they did, and the West European climate was not good for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:22 AM
4

Where are these great non-white empires today? What do you call China?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:20 AM
3

How many black scientists or Chinese playwrights can you name? Name five and I will name fifty white men who did it better and greater than the non-white. The reason you don't know any great Chinese playwrights is because you don't live in China. China has been doing the whole "civilization" thing way longer than we whites have. Women tend to be childish among themselves. They bicker, fight, and gossip. In this same way, we see non-whites and proto-whites do this. Just look at the Middle East. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:19 AM
4

Here are the top 10 causes of death for American women. You'll notice men aren't listed.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:42 PM
2

Can we send Marcotte to ISIS so she can get some perspective?
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:29 AM
12

In a letter university President Robert Zimmer and provost Eric Isaacs released on Thursday, the school affirmed that the campus is a place for free expression. President Zimmer and provost Isaacs are rapists. They need to be removed from their posts immediately in order to provide a safe learning environment to the students.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 08:17 PM
6

And women. He really does not like women.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 02:41 PM
3

Nope!
/r/MensRights30/09/14 08:47 PM
7

Well, worst case... a charge of illegally recording someone may be better than a rape charge (if it's admissable). There's no reason it wouldn't be admissable.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:28 PM
16

My understanding has been that if it's illegal to do it, it's illegal to admit it in court. If that were the case, we could never have accomplices testify.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:09 PM
25

Even if it were illegal, the recordings could still be used as evidence.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:23 PM
3

Also...female police officers have, um, weapons? I hear weapons are helpful in physical confrontations. I hear they even out many physical discrepancies between two people rather nicely. Cops aren't allowed to use their guns in most situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/14 03:57 PM
1

Wow, once your name is out of the window, it is hard to continue criminal activity, right? If anyone has the name and the list, they should make everyone on the list aware of who was defaming them.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 09:44 AM
2

Do you think these statistics are genuine? They're not. It's well known that the legal system simply won't use the word "rape" when women do it. Female serial killers also use methods that are harder to detect than those of male serial killers. With that said, it does seem to be the case that men are more likely to commit violent crimes than women.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:58 PM
1

It's a joke. "Incels" are fond of claiming that civilization is scamming them because they don't get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/14 05:32 PM
1

It's a joke. "Incels" are fond of claiming that civilization is scamming them because they don't get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/14 05:32 PM
3

The media makes these lunatics famous. It's not surprising that there are so many of them.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:17 PM
2

Aneesah Ali is the university's Title IX coordinator. As this is an issue of gender discrimination, it is her responsibility. Feel free to contact her if you want this matter addressed.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:40 PM
2

Criminals are defined by their disregard for society's rules. We can and do hold them accountable for their actions, but that doesn't undo the damage they can do before we catch them.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:51 PM
6

You can dramatically illustrate to complacent people that they could be targets of these witch-hunts, by making them all into "targets" of this one. Especially if you made "targets" of the people who would be likely to support these lists.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:57 PM
10

Their Title IX coordinator is Jerry Knighton. Contact him if you want to express your disagreement with this policy.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 02:20 AM
1

It is.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 09:29 AM
5

I thought that when I finally got my golden ticket into medical school, and my life felt (somewhat) figured out, I would be on a stable career trajectory and an easy dating path would follow. I mean, who doesn’t want to date a future doctor? You might be a doctor in the future, but you're a nuisance today.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 02:34 AM
1

Whether you're more interested in protecting the 2-8% of men who, according to our best statistics, have false rape allegations brought against them , 8% of rape accusations are unfounded. The number of false ones may be much higher. or if you're more concerned with protecting the 92-98% of women who were raped. It is better that the guilty go free than that the innocent be punished. End of story. I do not have a good answer to this problem. We either have to lay down our stringent attachment to…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:00 PM
1

So idk if the soldiers/marines really got their asses handed to them so much as drowned in the blood of their casualties We left, which is what they wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/14 11:18 PM
1

It's innocent college men, of course. Dr. Lisak, that sage, says it's their responsibility to confront rapists and tell them their conduct is out of line. This is seriously a bad idea. If you confront violent people, there is a good chance that they will attack you.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:49 PM
1

Black men also get harsher sentences for the same crimes than any other group of people.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:47 PM
2

Over all, no one gets a free pass on this. Except celebrities.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/14 12:19 AM
1

There is only one explanation: pussypass. Fame, actually. Underage people have been charged with manufacturing child porn before.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/14 12:19 AM
2

Wait no, that's wrong. In a legal sense, celebrities are still people who completely have rights. They don't sacrifice their legal protection just by making movies. In fact they do. Public figures do not have the same protections the rest of us do when it comes to defamation and privacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/14 06:50 AM
1

Because these women had no say in their naked bodies being exposed for the world to see. They didn't have to take those pictures. Can you not see how hard you are victim-blaming? "Don't put nudes online, they will get leaked" is just common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/14 06:48 AM
2

They were accused, therefore they are guilty!
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:30 PM
1

She pled guilty. That always helps.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:28 PM
0

Rapists who know what they're doing and do it anyway are beyond help That's over 99% of them.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:11 PM
1

You are absolutely wrong. They're allowed to ask you to commit crimes. They're just not allowed to force you to commit crimes.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:53 AM
0

entrapment is not forcing you to do something illegal Yes, it is. it can be merely encouraging you to do something illegal. Nope.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:19 AM
0

That is almost the same as planting evidence. Not really.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:54 AM
2

The vast majority of people who go through our court system are male.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:52 AM
1

You guys are idiots for supporting looters and rioters. This is not about looters or rioters, this is about the court system.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:51 AM
0

It's entrapment if they force you to do something that's illegal. Not letting people in late is not "entrapment." It may be horribly unethical, but it's not entrapment.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:51 AM
1

This "evidence" is then repeated in the media over and over again, never questioned! The media doesn't question anything. The media wants you to pay attention to them because that's how they make money. They sell sensational stories. That's their job. What I fear happening next will be a push to make anonymous posts illegal. Never going to happen. I just feel that this movement seems fake, like its being directed for a purpose by others. Doubtful.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:04 AM
3

But I do have a request for you: Stop publicly criticizing Quinn. Go after the men. Criticize the games themselves. But leave the women alone, even if you think they merit criticism. We don't take orders from you. I know it’s unfair for me to ask this of you, young gamer. A fair number of people—not you!—are doing a lot worse than criticizing. Those adolescents (or arrested adolescents) are trolling Quinn, harassing and threatening her, hacking her accounts, even calling her home and circulating…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:24 PM
2

Given that the most common date rape drug is alcohol, I doubt this stuff will do much good.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 04:26 PM
8

That’s not trying to stop rape - it’s essentially arguing that some people getting raped is inevitable. It is. Even if a woman were to wear special nail polish or anti-rape underwear, or if she listens to common – but misplaced – advice about not getting drunk and always walking home in a group, all she’s supposedly ensuring is that she won’t be attacked. (And even then it’s not real security, because women who do all the “right” things get raped too) The question is not "is it possible I will g…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 04:22 PM
1

Here you go.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:41 PM
1

If that were true he wouldn't have written this. The claims of an Armenian Genocide are not based on historical facts. If the history of the period is examined it becomes evident that in fact no such genocide took place He has never admitted that he was wrong.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:33 PM
14

Put another way: We will stop Dong Watch once there’s a female president, zero wage gap, and Swedish-level paid parental leave; once tampons, birth control, and abortions are all available free and on-demand. No you won't. If you actually thought objectification was wrong, you wouldn't do it. The fact that you do it shows that you don't really have a problem with it. Jon Hamm: No critically acclaimed human G.I. Joe ever lost a role because his dick was too big. They actually did have digitally t…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:48 AM
10

Sure sometimes, but like I said it's way worse for women So your plan is to pay a Polish girl to act like you haven't hit the wall?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 10:24 PM
12

A man reaches his peak SMV in his 30s provided he has kept in shape and progressed his career. Aside from his hair falling out and his skin starting to wrinkle. Which women do notice.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 10:16 PM
6

Your hamster is alive and well it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 10:05 PM
7

You really think women don't notice when your hair turns gray and starts to fall out?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 09:59 PM
8

You didn't answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 09:59 PM
7

You're not young anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 09:54 PM
21

Men don't hit the wall the way women do Our hair doesn't turn grey and fall out anymore? When did that happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 09:53 PM
8

If they want something long term, yes. I know my value. What value do you have?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 09:11 PM
7

No I'm not. I did my part. There was nobody there when it mattered. I have no incentive not to sleep around. And yet you expect any girl you meet in the future to be willing to ignore your past.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 09:06 PM
9

I was accountable when it mattered. You're denying responsibility for your actions. Meaning you're refusing accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 09:03 PM
4

It would be if women were chaste virgins with honor, but they're so few and far inbetween if not nonexistent, there's no point to care. I'm too old to care. I'm done playing by the rules. Then why should the good women have anything to do with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 09:02 PM
13

Women refuse to accept any accountability And so do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 09:00 PM
3

It's the rationalization hamster in action.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:57 PM
4

You admit to sleeping around. That's a bit of a no-no, is it not?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:56 PM
11

So the men are responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:56 PM
5

How so? You think you "deserve" a good girl in spite of the fact that you're not a good man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:54 PM
8

Women are the gatekeepers of sex, so yes - they are responsible for sex that occurs Is there an epidemic of women raping men?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:51 PM
5

Because I don't believe in unicorns anymore. I'm too old for fairytales. Evidently not. There's no incentive not to. It's either this or continuing a life of celibacy waiting for something that will never happen. And yet you think yourself entitled to a good woman in spite of the fact that you've spent your youth sleeping around.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:49 PM
6

The man-whoring that would cease immediately if I knew she could be trusted. Why are you doing it now? Yes. Hypergamy. Solipsism. Lack of foresight. And your reasons are?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:42 PM
8

I've done my part. I went above and beyond the call of duty in my youth. I am worthy. Aside from the man-whoring, which you now expect women to overlook. No. Any woman I would ever commit myself to deserves to know. Is it hypocritical? Somewhat, but I have very good reason to have made the choices I have. If they don't understand it, then they aren't really unicorns. You don't think women who sleep around have reasons for the choices they make?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:38 PM
10

Where are all the chaste virgins who don't sleep around in their youth that want to build a life together with good men? What makes you think you qualify as a good man? I'll quit my ways and run to them. They should just ignore your sexual past?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:28 PM
20

So when you hit the wall you're going to go pay some Polish girl to pretend that you're still attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:25 PM
13

Red pillers were playing ball until they realized nobody is playing by the rules anymore. I think that's called "the rationalization hamster."
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:23 PM
21

I've sometimes wanted to ask certain RPers what it is they're offering in exchange to this young, pretty, obedient, ever-faithful wife. I don't think they've put much thought into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 08:11 PM
38

Anyway, you know what? I don't even get this near-constant refrain of "we won't wife sluts". OK, Red Pill. Don't wife sluts. It's interesting that they think the good girls are going to husband them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 07:45 PM
1

He thinks the Armenian genocide never happened.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:20 PM
3

We're worse off than the Jews and the Blacks. We're better off than the Armenians at least. But you know all about that, don't you Cenk?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:20 PM
6

A short list of some of the lies that would have to be discontinued in order to make this peace accord work (though please share some more in comments—the lies anti-feminists tell about feminists are many in number!): Yes, I'm sure they're all lies. That feminists want to prosecute rape more aggressively not because they think rape is a serious crime, but because they want innocent men thrown in jail for REASONS. Catherine Comins actually said that it was good for men to be falsely accused of ra…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:53 PM
0

this is more of a racial thing than mensrights. i'm not even black, but we can all probably agree it had to do with the color of his skin. And the fact that he was male. The two are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 07:50 PM
3

Across the board, the syllabi begin with a history of feminism and theories of gender, then shift to political debates: At Williams, students delve into reproductive justice arguments, while at the University of Pennsylvania they learn about disability rights; University of Florida offers a module on “interlocking systems of oppression,” while at Barnard, they examine “hunger as ideology.” Real privilege is being able call hunger an "ideology" rather than a constant threat. Too bad feminists can…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 11:19 PM
2

Since when is the penalty for rape mutilation? It's called self defense.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 10:02 PM
1

I thought you go to jail if you are convicted, not accused. Nope. You can be held in jail until you are convicted if you don't get bail. This is to make sure that people who have been charged with crimes don't just run for it. You don't go to prison until you are convicted and given a long sentence.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:26 PM
9

The attorney was right.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 08:49 PM
0

No you illiterate prick of course he should have stopped - he didn't have to beat the shit out of him. Restrain and call the police. Beating him to a pulp restrained him.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 08:00 PM
2

We have a faction of politics that believes in giving more rights and protections to criminals over their victims. I can't think of any major political group in the US that thinks self-defense or defense of one's children should be illegal.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 02:50 PM
3

This was not the right thing to do though. We chose to live in a society where due process within a legal and criminal justice framework is a foundation. Not when a violent crime is in process. Force can be used to defend people from harm. Due process governs punishment, not acts to stop crimes as they are happening.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 02:33 PM
1

Punishing those who lie will not discourage people from telling the truth.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 11:31 PM
30

Nevertheless, Oberst’s handling of the incident isn’t without fault either. As Phoenix Tso at Jezebel pointed out, survivor advocacy group Right To Speak Out asked him to drop the lawsuit for fear that it would hurt other victims of sexual abuse and assault, and Oberst never responded to this request, seemingly unwilling to consider it. How is punishing liars going to hurt people who are telling the truth? But that’s also why the lawsuit felt so unnecessary. Oberst’s statement that he planned to…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:30 AM
3

The abolitionist tradition from which the feminist movement was birthed? Most abolitionists were racist by today's standards.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 11:55 PM
9

Car theft is property crime If you go up to a Hells Angel and call him a faggot, what's going to happen?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:21 PM
14

The typical sexual predator has sociopathic personality traits and low-empathy, which makes education a completely ineffective means of reduction. Men who rape do not rape because they are ignorant of what rape is, men who rape simply don't care. It's not just rapists, it's criminals in general. They simply don't care about the rules or about other people.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:20 PM
2

Cenk Uygur is an idiot. This should not come as a surprise to anyone.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:50 PM
0

Men who want to exercise their right to free speech need to be ready to exercise their right to self defense.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:16 PM
0

Shame one of them didn't decide to put the whale in the hospital. It would have taught her a valuable lesson.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:15 PM
-2

It wants to preserve it's power and enforcing it whenever it's able too. Which is not necessarily a bad thing. Why shouldn't the American government should put American interests first. It was hijacked a long time ago by corporate interests and the banking industry. You're implying that the government is united. Feminism, Wars, everything ridiculous in nature is by design. Wars predate the "hijacking" of the US government. There is no reason why we can go to the moon, make skyscrapers, cure dise…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:15 AM
2

What I don't understand is how anyone in their right mind could possibly come to the conclusion that there is a "culture of violence against women" in the first place. It takes quick glance over the statistics on violent crime to know that that is pretty far from the truth and yet it's become a commonly held belief. People are stupid.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 11:26 PM
7

Hasn't there been a study in the US that - states with better internet access exhibited highest decline in sexual assault cases? There's no evidence that the increased access to porn caused the decline. and afaik sexual assault cases has been in significant decline for a long time now In the US sexual assault has fallen over 60% since 1993.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 11:24 PM
1

As Jonathan Swift pointed out, it's a waste of time to try reasoning someone out of a position they were never reasoned into.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 01:27 AM
2

But defining feminism by the writings of Valerie Solanas or Andrea Dworkin is exactly like what a white supremacist does when he takes a white-hating passage from the manifestos of a group like the Nation of Islam or the New Black Panthers and presents it as the normative attitude of blacks; or what an anti-Semite does when he culls one of those Jewish supremacist passages from the Talmud and presents them as the normative view of everyone whose mother or father was Jewish. One chooses to identi…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 01:52 AM
42

The lesson that I got out of it was girls are weak... No, really... the entire self-defense class in gym was to teach girls how to get out of holds. First day was wrist holds. The teacher showed a simple break out technique and had the boys restrain the girls (yes, really). The girl I was paired with performed the break out exactly as it was demonstrated, but she couldn't break the wrist hold... I wasn't even gripping that tight. You can't effectively teach martial arts in an hour.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:32 AM
2

The Kurds will go after ISIS for this, and it won't end well for ISIS.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:22 PM
2

Wait what? Really? Why is that? You're less likely to survive getting shot with one.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 12:07 AM
2

A 110lb woman and a 220lb man are equally lethal given a gun. Take the guns away and there is no contest. Even if you believe the 'scary evil men' narrative. You should be pushing for increased gun ownership. Most people don't get how big the difference in physical prowess between the average man and the average woman is.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:03 PM
2

When women are on the receiving end of so much intimate gun violence, it’s difficult to argue that widespread, easy access can only empower them. A firearm is the only thing that can give a woman a fighting chance against a man.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 10:59 PM
2

The sickening truth is you can buy a silencer for a woman. It’s a called a handgun. Long guns are far more dangerous than handguns.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 10:58 PM
1

The idea is that affirmative action will balance out racism.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:24 AM
1

It's also got some pretty good reasoning behind it. There are good arguments against it, and good arguments for it.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:04 AM
1

convinced them equal opportunity was not enough, and Affirmative Action, quotas, "positive discrimination" in their favor was better It's not just black people who support affirmative action.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:54 AM
12

Obama's New Initiative Wants Young Men Of Color To Succeed Despite Racism -- But They Need To Unlearn Misogyny First Because we all know that black men are brutes who run around raping and beating women all day. If honorable knights of the Ku Klux Klan say it, who are we to disagree? What if the resources available to My Brother's Keeper were instead used to eliminate male domination so young women and men could build strong alliances and fight racism together? The rates of murder, homelessness,…
/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:13 AM
9

The Father is male because when scriptures were written, males were authorities. Christian theology holds that God has no sex.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:20 PM
1

Neither of you have posted a single word on topic. The topic is social factors holding back black males.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 03:28 PM
2

You are proposing putting unqualified individuals in the healthcare industry and all of our lives at risk. He did no such thing. He merely suggested that there may be social factors holding black males back. He's also entirely correct.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:17 AM
1

The men's rights movement would do best to distance themselves from the real deadbeat dads, rapists and net losses to society black males are. Ted Bundy was apparently black.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:31 PM
3

The report said 2.5% of medical school applicants were black men in 2011, a drop from 2.6% in 2002. The problem is a lack of black men going to college at all rather than a lack of black men in college trying to get into medical school. The gap seen among African-American men in medicine does not start when students apply to medical school. About 3% of college graduates are black men, We need to ask why black men aren't in college, not why the ones in college aren't going to medical school. The …
/r/MensRights21/06/14 07:09 PM
1

I am going to emphasize that she never accused these 5 men of raping her as she suffered memory loss from the trauma. The boys went to prison for a crime they didn't commit. The fact that she wasn't the person behind it doesn't change what happened to them.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:42 PM
1

Except the prince and the crow.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 11:03 PM
2

Oh yeah, self defense is a bad argument. If it's self defense, you don't go to prison at all.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 12:41 AM
22

“I'm a single mother, and I can guarantee you I can give Evan every one of those things also,” You're a worthless idiot who blamed your son's autism on vaccines.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 06:15 PM
2

It’s a general belief that men who commit rapes are mentally ill or 'monsters'. But studies show that only five per cent of men are psychotic at the time of their crimes and few convicted rapists are referred for psychiatric treatment. This is a lie. While very few rapists are insane, almost all of them are mentally ill.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:39 PM
4

This woman is either a moron, or cast iron bitch with a malicious, hate-filled agenda. Or both.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:22 AM
4

Jury nullification comes to mind.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:38 PM
7

White people are not any more likely to commit mass shootings than nonwhites.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:59 PM
1

Blacks do not change to make whites feel better, because history tells us the violence we associate with them stems from history of oppression. The black people running around committing crimes today were never slaves. Similarly, the fear women feel around men stems from other forms of oppression. No it doesn't. Their fear has no basis in reality.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:22 AM
1

So why are you claiming men are obligated to cater to women's bigotry?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:34 AM
1

So it's a problem when women are bigoted?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:40 AM
53

If you are a man, you are part of rape culture. I know … that sounds rough. "If you're a black, you're part of thug culture. I know ... that sounds rough." But just imagine moving through the world, always afraid you could be raped. That’s even worse! Rape culture sucks for everyone involved. If you're a self righteous bigot who thinks all men are rapists, you deserve to live in fear. If you're a bigot, the recipients of your bigotry are not obligated to go out of their way to make you comfortab…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:45 AM
1

Bigotry's not a problem?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:31 AM
1

Because there is a problem You mean the bigotry?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:29 AM
1

Then why's it OK for women to demand that men accommodate their fears?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:04 AM
1

if its only feelings, yeah. So if they post on Twitter demanding that blacks go out of their way to accommodate that uneasiness, that's OK?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:57 PM
2

A lot of men use steroids to treat allergies and asthma.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:28 PM
1

So if white people are just "uneasy" around blacks that's OK?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:56 PM
3

These two 12-year-old girls were apparently so convinced that Slenderman was real, that he was watching them, reading their minds and teleporting, and so desperate to be his proxy that police found them walking along the road on their way to his "mansion in the woods" to go live with him. Because we totally don't need to keep that kind of craziness isolated from the rest of society.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:13 AM
1

Effective self defence in a actual combat situation throws out all the rules. Effective self defense starts by avoiding actual combat situations.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:35 PM
1

Then the women who view all men as criminals are as well.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:59 AM
1

So whites who view all blacks as criminals aren't bigots?
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:02 AM
1

Because there is a problem, and due to historical elements surrounding the situation, it is not fair to expect women to deal it with it. Why not? They're the bigots, aren't they?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:42 PM
1

For fucks sake you're daft, I already explained this 3 times now and this will be the fourth: the reason blacks aren't obligated to change is because of the historical elements surrounding their situation. So why are men obligated to change to make women happy?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 10:07 PM
2

It is hard to imagine that a woman-hating mass-murderer like Elliot Rodger would have cheerleaders, The Boston Marathon bombers have fangirls. Ted Bundy had fangirls. The Columbine shooters have fans. Why exactly is it hard to imagine Rodger having fans? A lot of people lionize antisocial lunatics.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:17 PM
2

So, are whites correct to feel "uneasy" around blacks? On a individual, experienced level, maybe (again, this assumes your statistics are accurate). Does this means blacks should change to accommodate? If blacks aren't obligated to change to make whites happy, why are men obligated to change to make women happy?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:01 AM
4

But, we both know, accuarate history is part of the question. Blacks are more likely to commit violent crimes than whites.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:47 AM
5

Comparing an insanely historically abused/disadvantaged minority to a 1/2 population that has dominated the institutional and private sector of this country for over a century is about as ridiculous as it gets. So who is to blame for white racism? Whites or blacks?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:23 AM
3

Except it's not. Yes, it is. The author here didn't phrase herself well, but I think what's she's saying is that men are people she feels uneasy about at night, on streets, etc. A women would not instill this same kind of fear. A lot of white people are "uneasy" around blacks. Is this the fault of blacks, or the fault of whites?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:44 AM
4

Kind of like the U.S. Government no longer pretending after years of accusations about their domestic spying programs, and monitoring U.S. citizens. The US government used to be a lot worse than it is today. At least today they're not imprisoning an entire ethnicity to prevent an imaginary terrorist attack.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:24 AM
1

Here's my response to that article. If you are a man, you are part of rape culture. I know … that sounds rough. "If you're a black, you're part of thug culture. I know ... that sounds rough." But just imagine moving through the world, always afraid you could be raped. That’s even worse! Rape culture sucks for everyone involved. If you're a self righteous bigot who thinks all men are rapists, you deserve to live in fear. If you're a bigot, the recipients of your bigotry are not obligated to go ou…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:27 AM
5

I'm not worried about the counter protest if they remain non-violent. They're "fat acceptance" activists. They're not going to get violent.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:44 AM
23

This was merely an explanation of why women and female presenting folks are cautious of men. Especially after recent events. One guy out of about 150 million in this country went on a shooting rampage. He killed two women out of the approximately 160 million women in this country. Mass shooters just aren't worth that much worry. They're not like car accidents or heart disease. Not all CEOs are corrupt? Not all CEOs are corrupt. That's a perfectly valid point to make. Not all police use brutal fo…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:17 PM
14

Here are the leading causes of death for women. Heart disease Cancer Stroke Chronic lower respiratory disease Alzheimer's disease Unintentional injuries Diabetes Influenza and pneumonia Kidney disease Septicemia Not only is homicide not the leading cause of death for women, it's not even in the top 10.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:32 PM
6

Women are more likely to kill themselves than they are to be murdered.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:18 PM
3

The error in this is that gender IS biologically determined. I recall a story of a child that was born male, but due to complications, had his penis removed and was classified as female David Reimer.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:19 PM
3

While statistics are hard to come by, most current estimates suggest that between 1 in 4 or 1 in 3 women will be raped during their lifetimes. RAINN says it's 1 in 6, and they include attempts. Far more will face other forms of sexual violence, sexual harassment, and general sexism. And men never face these things? More importantly it warps the very fabric of our culture, making women reasonably fearful, even if they have never themselves been a victim of sexual violence or intimidation. Is it "…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:26 PM
5

The only thing constant in her dates is her. If she could recognize that, life would be easier for her.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:30 AM
15

Elliot Rodger might have killed more men than women, but the first three men were his room-mates, a prelude to the purposeful carnage. Those dead men? They're just an accident. They weren't "purposefully" killed. It's not really bad when three men are stabbed to death. But male disposability isn't real.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:04 AM
6

The FBI doesn't have the manpower to handle every loudmouthed idiot on the internet.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:18 PM
7

It’s normal to overlook the female orgasm. So women are entitled to sexual pleasure, but men aren't. It’s embedded in the way promiscuous men are idolized in Bond movies Have you seen the recent movies? They make it clear that Bond's a lunatic. All of these normal behaviors seem harmless when looked at individually, but they are symptoms of a larger cultural attitude that overvalues male sexuality We mutilate our male children's genitals. So much for "overvaluing" their sexuality. In intimate re…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:41 AM
1

Western law enforcement is pretty good at dismantling criminal organizations.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:42 PM
17

They quote all sorts of statistics about child custody and unfair alimony payments, because in their minds, the single mother who has to choose between feeding the kids or paying the rent is a myth. The fact that some single mothers have a hard time paying their bills does not negate the fact that men get screwed over in divorce court. The two are not mutually exclusive. There are Reddit threads and other Internet forums dedicated to men’s rights, and the language and vitriol towards women and e…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:35 PM
5

Everyone keeps saying "We don't know if he was mentally ill". Was he not seeing multiple therapists? Perhaps he didn't have a diagnosis of "clinically insane" but at the least he was disturbed, right? Insanity's a legal term, not a medical one. It doesn't look like he was insane. It does look like he was mentally ill.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:26 PM
2

These people want fame. They want to whole world to bow down to them. And when we give them news coverage, we're giving them the fame they desire. Letting the news be dominated by this idiot just tells every other narcissist out there that this is the way to fame.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:11 PM
3

Indeed, whenever some depraved narcissist tries to elevate his lonely, meandering existence to mythological status, all he has to do is record a couple of videos and then go out and slaughter a few innocent civilians. Every time, the message we send is clear: OK. We will give you exactly what you wanted. We will plaster your face all over the news and our Facebook pages. We will talk about you incessantly for weeks. Your name will be known, while your victims remain nameless. Some people say thi…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:51 PM
25

White guy killer syndrome: Elliot Rodger’s deadly, privileged rage Rodger was half-Asian. black men are not rolling onto college campuses and into movie theaters on a regular basis to shoot large numbers of people. Usually, the young men who do that are white, male, heterosexual and middle-class. Most males are white and heterosexual. It's not surprising that most of the males who go on shooting rampages are white and heterosexual. Elliot Rodger was a late bloomer, which while socially inconveni…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:31 PM
1

He was diagnosed with Aspergers Syndrome, his parents knew it and in the wake of the shooting are campaigning for mental illness awareness. He was also pretty obviously a narcissist.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 08:48 PM
6

The male victims should matter just as much as the female victims. Each person should be equally valuable. But if people are trying to figure out "why" he did what he did It's called narcissistic rage.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 08:29 PM
1

Male disposability.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 08:29 PM
4

He did write about killing the ones he viewed as having wronged him by succeeding with women, and most of his victims were male.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:21 AM
2

He wanted to put all women in a concentration camp and watch them starve to death from a tower in the center of it. I didn't say he didn't hate women.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:06 AM
20

Allow me to explain just how wrong Valenti is. We should know this by now, but it bears repeating: misogyny kills. Perhaps, but this guy didn't seem to hate women any more than he hated men. On Friday night, a man – identified by police as Elliot Rodgers – allegedly seeking "retribution" against women whom he said sexually rejected him went on a killing spree in Isla Vista, California, killing six people and sending seven more to the hospital with serious gunshot injuries. Two sentences into the…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:17 AM
7

Elliot Roger was a narcissist. He described himself as a "true gentleman," a "true alpha male," and "the closest thing there is to a living god." Here's the problem with narcissists: their fantasies don't match up with reality. His fantasy of being the irresistible man who women would line up to sleep with didn't match up with the reality that he was a total failure with women. That's called narcissistic injury. What followed is what's known as narcissistic rage. He got mad at the world for not …
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:38 PM
3

This guy, like a lot of other mass shooters, wanted to be famous. The media is only encouraging these guys by giving them so much attention.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:12 AM
7

There is more evidence here to blame TYT for Rodgers' actions than to blame the MRM. The dude was watching a channel named for a group of people who committed genocide. Obviously he was going to kill people!
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:09 AM
1

you're crazy enough to be institutionalized against your will, but sane enough to be held accountable for a nonviolent crime? Sanity is a legal term. If you were able to understand your actions and freely chose to engage in criminal ones, you are legally considered sane.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 02:45 AM
3

Just sounds like these guys are preying on women who are from places with terrible economies and thus need the RP man for his money. I don't think it's fair to generalize every man who marries a foreign woman as a predator.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/14 12:01 AM
2

As an RP man are western men seeking Asian and Eastern European women? Men have always been taking foreign wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 11:59 PM
1

Campus disciplinary committees don't have the resources or legal expertise to deal with serious crimes like rape, I don't understand why they just don't contact the police. Because it would make the school look bad to have cops running around.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:11 PM
18

A man is someone who pays his female employees less. So if a man does not do this, is he not a man? A man is someone who interrupts a woman when she's in the middle of saying something. And if a woman interrupts a woman? A man expects his wife to do all the cooking and cleaning. And if a man does not do this, is he not a man? What's that you say? Not ALL men pay their employees less? Not ALL men interrupt women? Not only do not all men do this, a fair amount of women expect wives to handle domes…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 01:00 AM
31

Women are scheming bitches who falsely accuse men of rape. What's that? Not all women do this? Obviously you're just a man-hating sexist. If you weren't, you wouldn't try to distract from the issue by telling the truth.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 12:42 AM
2

On the eve of a two-day conference on sexual exploitation, they suggested that porn be tackled in the same manner as teenage smoking or drunk driving. We're going to encourage fathers to talk honestly to their sons? Or are we still pretending they're unnecessary? Because those stupid public health campaigns where middle age bureaucrats pretend to be "down with the youth" don't stop smoking. Good parents do. "This is a business with considerable political clout," said Gail Dines, a sociology and …
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:00 AM
1

Redpill men think they're "alpha" and therefore the greatest people on the planet. Tumblr SJWs think they're "empowered" and therefore the greatest people on the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/14 11:53 PM
2

If the universities had to admit that crime was possible on their campuses, it would make them look bad. So the last thing they want is to have cops running around.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:43 PM
1

You're seriously quoting manboobz? You know that he misleads to the point of lying regularly? He's also pro-rape, just so long as women do it.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 08:04 AM
5

True, but the cops have to make sure that bystanders who are trying to help don't just make things worse.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 03:18 AM
5

If the fire really was as bad as the fox news story above says, he wouldn't have been able to get in either. The police also have the job of making sure no one interferes with the fire department's work.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 02:29 AM
14

If you think we're bad, you haven't met anyone else on planet earth.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:45 AM
1

For those curious, here is a real scientist explaining why Guy McPherson is an idiot who should not be trusted.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:07 PM
5

Earth, I love you. I always have. You and your elemental inhabitants are the most beautiful beings that I have ever seen, met, felt and experienced. You are the most beautiful life experiment in this universe. You are music to my ears and soul. And your green! The sound of the leaves in the wind. The scents. The sunrise and sunset. The moon. The humming of the bees, the rushing of the waves. The infinite moments of sensory ecstasy and blissful encounters with other beings. Discovering woman-iden…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 06:57 PM
1

Assuming the Nigerians don't just do it themselves. They have a military.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 06:38 PM
10

Yeah I'd rather be hacked to death or burned alive then forcibly raped as a slave for the rest of my life. I can't believe this is even a debate. Well, maybe you guys have never been raped in the face. You ever been burned alive or chopped up with a machete? It isn't pretty.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 06:36 PM
27

A 31-year-old female doctor's aide wrote confessing she conducted medical tests on a nude 19-year-old man, even though it wasn't necessary for him to be nude. He was embarrassed, but the aide admitted that she "enjoyed the situation immensely," and hoped it would happen again with other young men. Did Ann slam her for invading the young man's privacy? Did Ann tell her she needed professional help because this conduct doesn't bode well for her future? Of course not. "Everyone has fantasies," Ann …
/r/MensRights06/05/14 11:45 PM
57

It successfully overturned laws that discriminate against men. Feminists have fought to keep female perpetrated rape legal, promoted the Duluth model, instituted biased family courts, and done nothing about the draft. They have actively gone out of their way to promote legal discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:35 PM
4

Hundreds of years ago, life expectancy was a fraction of what it is today. When two people in their 20s got married, it was quite possible that one of the two would be deceased within 10-15 years -- often much sooner Nope. People's life expectancies were so short due to infant mortality and death by pregnancy more than anything else. It was entirely possible for someone who survived those things to live to 60.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:19 PM
9

It's Game of Thrones. There are no good guys on this show. The "heroes" are "heroic" because they're slightly less evil than the bad guys.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:02 PM
6

Feminists don't really hate men though. All you have to do to believe that is ignore all of the evidence. You know, like Mr. Cohan did.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:46 AM
4

patriarchy, as a feminist concept, is NOT a 'cabal of elite white men ruling the world'. it is also not the fault of men in general -- like i said, many have no idea they're even perpetuating it They don't? Because that's not what feminists say. The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each individual male in the patriarchy is aware of his relative power in the scheme of things.... He knows that his actions are supported by the twin pillars of the State of man - the brotherhood ritual of p…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:25 AM
2

Yes, absolutely. The parallels to anti-Semitic "theories" about Jews ruling the world are blatantly obvious - I always thought the term "feminazi" was kind of dumb and came from a same place as "grammar nazi" or "soup nazi" but the more I learn about feminist theory the more its clear that feminism and Nazism have a ton in common and that there couldn't be a more apt term for a hardcore feminist. Marxists are much the same way. The Kulaks/Jews/Patriarchs are part of some insane plan that somehow…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:17 AM
2

It's the feminist version of the white supremacist's international Jewish conspiracy.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:13 AM
10

There’s no reason that any geek property couldn’t stand to be more diverse. Except there are good reasons. Lord of the Rings, for instance, is a European story. Tolkien crafted it to be a mythology for Britain. It should have European actors. We wouldn't expect a movie based in African mythology to have "diversity" and include some Swedish and Chinese guys.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 01:59 AM
3

People often complain that the Bechdel Test doesn’t having any bearing on how well female characters are portrayed, but it’s not supposed to. The point of the test (two women who talk to each other about something other than a man, in case anyone doesn’t know) is that it looks for minimum amount of effort on the part of artists to include women. Except it doesn't work. Lots of movies have good reasons for lacking a large female presence. Take any movie involving the military or the police, for i…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 01:55 AM
35

The defense didn't "exploit the mistakes" of Nifong. Nifong got caught hiding exculpatory evidence. He didn't "believe" Crystal Mangum, he knew she was lying through her teeth and continued anyways because he wanted to win the black vote in his reelection campaign.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:29 AM
2

So we shouldn't say "not all men are like that," but we can't say "all feminists are like that." And they wonder why we look down on feminists.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:22 AM
5

We need not concern ourselves with a washed up old pedophile.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:17 PM
5

Can you? She didn't say no.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:45 AM
5

Consent can be withdrawn It wasn't. Making the sex they had consensual, and not rape. Making her a liar.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:27 AM
0

Rape culture isn't real in the west.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:22 AM
3

Remember this the next time one of them pretends misandry isn't real.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:02 AM
2

My boyfriend of 2 and a half years called me a liar and untrustworthy because I decided I wasn’t actually in the mood to have sex. It was easier to lie there and fake orgasms than have the fight that would ensue if I said ‘no’. He was a ‘nice guy’, and probably has no idea that what he did was rape. Probably because it wasn't. You chose to have sex with him. You may not have enjoyed it, but that's not on him.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:53 AM
2

So circumstantial evidence? K. The most likely possibility is that a feminist did it. It could have been an MRA. It could have been a random idiot who just wanted to cause trouble. But it was probably a feminist.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 12:25 AM
1

Didn't like women very much" is putting it lightly. Lepine's claimed he was "fighting against feminism" during and before the shooting, and blamed feminists for ruining his life in his suicide note. Right before he shot a whole bunch of women, after having all the men leave the room. Which suggests sex meant more to him than ideology. Is antifeminism not a defining aspect of the MRM? Obviously anyone who thinks Nazism is bad is a Stalinist by your logic. Sodini, an avowed anti-feminist, attended…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:51 PM
1

There's a summer camp in Norway that might want to have a word with you about the rampage thing... Demented white supremacist, not an MRA. Also, no solid evidence that a feminist pulled the alarm. There wasn't a fire and they did want to disrupt the event. It IS interesting how much political capital you guys have tried to gain from that Of course, it's just a conspiracy.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:30 PM
0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_L%C3%A9pine Not an MRA. Just someone who was crazy and didn't like women very much. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Collier_Township_shooting Again, Sodini wasn't an MRA. He was just a lunatic who couldn't get laid.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:53 PM
1

Yes. Yes it does. I've never said otherwise. That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. If someone goes along with it, is not forced, is mentally capable of consent, and does not say no there is no reason to call it rape. So we have a couple of dollars tossed at a film about a happy event, maybe. K You asked the question, I gave the answer. Yeah, damn those 15-year-old rape victims. They were bullying you so badly with their wanting their cases to be heard. Parsons wasn't bullied by MRAs, she …
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:52 PM
1

If you want to fuck, then "yes" isn't a hard word to say So if a girl initiates sex and a guy never explicitly says yes but does go along, she's a rapist? That's how it has to work. Tell you what. Show me something good that the MRM has done. Something that isn't "I didn't like that person, and we bullied them out of the public". A lot of MRAs donated to the kickstarter for the film about Brian Banks. And one could argue that it is good to hold bigots accountable. We merely repeat what feminists…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:36 PM
2

She claims to be harassed by a cybermob of ‘more than 400 people’ which led to her diagnosis. You're not that important. '1) I didn't self-diagnose or decide to have PTSD. I was diagnosed by a very good psychiatrist. No you weren't.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:44 PM
2

“While I believe someone found guilty of violent rape should not be able to graduate at all, the least Brown can do is keep me safe for the rest of my time as an undergraduate,” Sclove wrote when she appealed the decision. Vice President for Campus Life and Student Services Margaret Klawunn denied the appeal, writing in an email that the assailant’s suspension length was “reasonably consistent with precedent in similar cases.” Sclove says that later, Klawunn told her she was “sorry [Sclove] was …
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:03 AM
7

First, I believe it IS sexist. Your argument is that feminists cannot be trusted. Feminism is an ideology, not a sex. There are male feminists, and females who are not feminists.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:02 PM
1

Because police officers frequently get called to domestic disputes.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:57 AM
1

If that were true they could find ways around it. Not really. The cops try not to kill people. Unfortunately some people refuse to stop for anything less than lethal force.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:52 AM
26

Even these days I get surprised when I read statistics like 60% of all people have tried online dating. It seems like just yesterday that the only people who would even consider it were complete losers who had no friends or social skills and spent all their time playing Dungeons and Dragons. Dungeons and Dragons players tend to have friends, actually. If you're a douchebag, no one's going to spend 2 hours at a time playing an RPG with you.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:24 AM
3

It should be noted that real members of special police and military units do not look like action stars. Extra muscle mass requires too many calories to keep up, and it slows you down.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:10 PM
14

Feminists hate men. This is not a particularly difficult thing to grasp.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:59 PM
5

This guy went out of his way to keep evidence that the team was innocent hidden, and it's their fault for not playing along. Right.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:36 AM
1

Well, I have one criticism of Yancy in this situation. He's failing to consider the impact gender may have on this situation. She may have been scared because he was a man and she would have every right to considering all the things men have done to women So because some black males are violent psychopaths it's OK to treat them all like that? What kind of a worthless "philosopher" doesn't know about the fallacy of composition?
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:33 AM
11

Pulling a fire alarm to shut down a talk is a violation of free speech. Not to mention illegal.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:52 PM
4

I don't understand how a man trying to get a candy bar means that he will beat a woman? It doesn't.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:47 PM
15

I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them -Robin Morgan. The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each individual male in the patriarchy is aware of his relative power in the scheme of things.... He knows that his actions are supported by the twin pillars of the State of man - the brotherhood ritual of political exigency and the brotherhood ritual of a sexual thrill in dominan…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:49 PM
1

They don't want Russian soldiers or supporters coming in and creating trouble, Ukraine is a nation under siege right now with Russia taking parts at a time and nobody doing anything to help them despite agreements that the US and NATO would defend them The Russians are annexing Ukraine because of our attempts to get them into NATO.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 09:29 PM
1

So why cant women do this again ?? Women generally aren't used as black ops soldiers. They might be used to gather information, but they're generally not used to blow up police stations.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 09:29 PM
1

TIL women cannot be 'activists' They're substantially less likely to be black ops guys sent in to blow things up.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 09:26 PM
0

Interestingly, the way he describes men (including himself, disturbingly enough) is the way psychopaths describe violent criminals. They have a superficial charm concealing their inner craziness.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:28 PM
11

Something about his ability to weave together nouns, verbs and pronouns to form real, intelligible sentences It's called glib charm, and it's a common trait among psychopaths. They seem like decent, thoughtful guys. It's an act. By insulating myself with the intellectually evasive dismissal of violent men as psychotic or sociopathic aberrations, I self-comforted by avoiding the more terrifying concept that violent men are socialised by the ingrained sexism and entrenched masculinity that permeat…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:27 PM
2

It's not a "myth," it's reality. Violent criminals do not think like the rest of us. That's why they're violent criminals. Most of us are social animals who obey the rules of the group, including the ones against rape and murder. Violent criminals don't.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:40 PM
7

Apparently garbage men are high paid, high status workers, as are coal miners and lumberjacks. And nurses are apparently underpaid and hated by society. You only have to ignore, oh, all of reality for this to make sense.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:33 PM
21

The possibility of having a wife who indulges you with regular sex, The fact that she considers sex with your spouse an "indulgence" tells us how miserable Mr. Marcotte must be.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:54 AM
6

Marcotte is a rape promoter. We don't need to listen to her.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:53 AM
3

You seem to be one of "those" people who think communism just "hasn't been tried properly," and like free market true believers who forget the horrors of what happened during industrialization, you willfully ignore the communist regimes of the 20th century. Here's a clue: that shit is incompatible with human nature. This comic is relevant.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:42 AM
8

The progressives and the anti-establishment will also lead a revolution against the status quo, after which they will instate themselves as the establishment. That's how revolutions work. It is not the rare revolution that ends with a psychotic dictator taking over and making everything worse, it's the rare revolution that doesn't.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:38 AM
3

Amanda Marcotte is a known rape supporter. We don't need her support, and we don't need to be worried about her criticism.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:58 PM
7

Double standard alert! How many men get a suspended sentence after rape with the "I was on strong medication" defense? If a doctor had prescribed them the medication? It's not improbable.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:23 PM
3

So with these two irrational arguments punctured, we need to wonder why men are so keen to protect rapists and abusers. My own personal theory is that they know in their hearts they, too, have something to hide. They remember that night where she was too drunk, they remember that boy who was far too young, they remember that time they had to wheedle and fight for it. "And if you're not with Comrade Stalin you're obviously a kulak" is what she's saying.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 06:01 PM
2

That's like a cop asking you if he can search your house. When you say no, not without a search warrant, he says that your refusal to consent to the search gives him probable cause to search. Do note that under US law a refusal to consent to a search can not be used as evidence of wrongdoing.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:20 PM
12

It is true that women in our culture are subject to all forms of sexual violence As are men. Actually, most violent crime victims are male.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:41 PM
8

Wiping the back of his hand across his snot-stained upper lip, Saunders moans “Female privilege is being able to walk down the street at night without people crossing the street because they’re automatically afraid of you”. When translated into terms outside of embarrassing self-flagellation, Saunders is arguing that being fucking threatened is a privilege. That being a fucking threat constitutes an unfair manifestation of hegemonic mechanism. The average male is not a violent criminal, and men …
/r/MensRights12/04/14 05:52 PM
10

How it seeks to project itself onto feminism, how it silences them so their arguments cannot be heard? Actually, our biggest successes come when we reveal what you all are saying to the whole wide world. We give you the rope, and you hang yourselves. Big Red, Vliet Tiptree, and now Mercer. We don't need to silence you to embarrass you. We just need to let you talk.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 11:33 PM
15

I am giving you twenty-four hours to remove from the internet all libellous representations of me as a “rape apologist,” a “victim blamer,” a “pedophile” and other such falsehood and innuendo that your site has irresponsibly allowed to be published. Libel, by definition, is untrue. The things AVFM posted about you are true. You are in fact a rape apologist. You insisted that it doesn't count when female prison guards rape little boys because obviously the little boys want it. That means calling …
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:39 PM
27

Language, since time immemorial, has forced women to be resident aliens. The rules were men’s rules, and women just had to deal with that. Language is something that naturally develops, not something that three guys in a room invented one day. The idea that it's part of some international male conspiracy could only be taken seriously if you had some sort of mental illness... Patriarchal language isn’t just a reflection of the way our society is gendered, it actively genders society. Using mascul…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:22 PM
9

No it's not. What’s wrong with this picture? Both women clearly support gender equality but for some reason feel that the label “feminist” does not represent them. They have reasons for that. I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them -Robin Morgan. The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each individual male in the patriarchy is aware of his relative power in the scheme of th…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:34 PM
2

The ‘Don’t Be a Bystander’ video campaign includes local leaders and celebrities urging men to be “allies” for women, both in their individual interactions and in their interactions with broader social forces. Yeah, don't ever do this. If you see crime happening, your best bet is to call 911 and get to safety. You don't know if the other guy has a gun or a knife. You don't know how desperate he is. Trying to intervene could get you killed or in serious legal trouble.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:04 PM
0

The first Fort Hood shooter was not stopped by a female officer. Kimberly Munley did not shoot Nidal Hasan. He was shot by a male police officer named Mark Todd.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:45 AM
11

Rick Perry also had an innocent man executed.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:30 AM
8

This is a classic case of an abuser getting exactly what she deserves. She thought she owned that guy and he smacked her sorry ass down. She got totally owned and she's somehow convinced she's the victim.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:39 AM
68

Let's look at what feminists actually think of science. In that case, why is it not as illuminating and honest to refer to Newton’s laws as “Newton’s rape manual” as it is to call them “Newton’s mechanics”? -Sandra Harding. Is e=mc2 a sexed equation? Perhaps it is. Let us make the hypothesis that it is insofar as it privileges the speed of light over other speeds that are vitally necessary to us. -Luce Irigaray. They're idiots who know nothing about science.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 09:33 AM
7

Here is the email address for the Glendale Commission on the State of Women. [email protected] The phone number is 818-548-2000. If you want to express your discontent with their policies, contact them directly. They're the ones who set the free classes up. It may very well be that they're willing to listen to reason.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:38 PM
1

It always amuses me to hear about the most out of shape, intellectually lacking people on the planet talking about violence as though it's actually an option for them. If there was some radfem uprising, the lucky "revolutionaries" would be the ones who died quickly.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:23 AM
24

The national average IQ rises ever so slightly.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 04:32 AM
16

They can have the bats. We here in America have guns.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:52 AM
7

If they aren't violent, then they're still "bad cops", because they're amazingly inept at being cops! Sadly this is not the only case where police departments have had standoffs with empty houses.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:02 PM
-11

They try to use swat as often as they can do they can keep getting funding from Homeland security. They use SWAT teams to prevent people from getting hurt.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:01 PM
11

There's bad apples on each side. I don't see MRAs putting people in danger just to disrupt protests.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:59 AM
2

Female teachers are also known to be incredibly sexist towards male students, so removing male teachers actually hurts male students academically.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:55 AM
1

Generally the police don't even manage that. When you've got someone threatening you with a knife (or actually shooting at you) it's really hard to shoot accurately. Especially with a handgun.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 03:31 PM
5

Call in a medic, shoot him in a non lethal location, give him medic when he drops knives. Shooting someone in a "non lethal" location only works in movies. In the real world it is a waste of time.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 06:04 AM
2

Arian Germans It's "Aryan" in this context. The Arians were a heretical Christian sect.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 07:05 AM
8

The man also put up a wanted poster for her on the grounds that she had the "baddest body in Miami" and asked her to take off her kevlar vest so he could see what he'd be working with. Most of the damages were also punitive.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:18 PM
0

She's a terrorist. That's really all there is to say about this.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 10:41 PM
0

Your claim is unsubstantiated.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:42 PM
0

You fail to provide any evidence for yours.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:31 PM
1

You're making unsubstantiated claims again.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:26 PM
0

You have offered no proof of that claim.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:12 PM
8

Perhaps she could take a temporary leave of absence from teaching, but I feel that firing her is too extreme of a response. To beating up kids? Not really.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:09 PM
0

I do not.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:10 PM
2

No, you just contradict yourself I do not.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:44 AM
0

Nope, you're the liar, Again you are claiming to have psychic powers.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:49 AM
0

No I did not. You did that.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:47 AM
1

As are you every time you accuse me of lying. I never said you need to have psychic powers to say if someone is lying.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 08:15 AM
1

As are you every time you accuse me of lying. I never said you need to have psychic powers to say if someone is lying.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 08:15 AM
3

I have acknowledged the other side of the argument No, you engaged a straw man.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 08:09 AM
0

So you're claiming to have psychic powers. That's another lie.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:34 AM
1

Nope, you're the lower primate. Any evidence for that claim? No, you keep lying, as I've demonstrated several times already. Were you dropped from the second or third floor window? No, you're a stupid liar, again, as I've demonstrated many times already. Why are you still lying to me?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:34 AM
0

I'm not lying Evidence suggests you are, actually.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:33 AM
0

Then stop talking physics to lower primates on another thread, dumbass. You're the lower primate here. You're so stupid you can't even tell when I'm joking, what chimp you are. You're the one who keeps lying. You're either stupid or a liar, pick one. Evidence suggests that you're both.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:31 AM
0

Repeating your lies does not make them true.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:28 AM
0

Either it's a person from conception and therefore a miscarriage is accidental murder of a person through abandonment (manslaughter), It would actually be death by natural causes.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:27 AM
0

This isn't a debate. No. This is me trying to explain mass energy equivalence to a chimpanzee. No, it's with the box of frozen sleep, I checked. I'm filing that under the lie category. No, you're the liar, I'm not, So you're psychic?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:26 AM
0

Either it's a person from conception and therefore a miscarriage is accidental murder of a person through abandonment (manslaughter), No, it would be death by natural causes. This is not that hard to understand.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:24 AM
3

It's like a chimp dealing attending a physics lecture. It may hear the words, but it never understands them.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:23 AM
0

Has nothing to do with the US legal system. Brainless little idiot, please try to understand: If you kill a person by accident, that's manslaughter Natural death is not manslaughter. A miscarriage is exactly that if, as you say, life begins at conception. So apparently you don't understand the difference between abortion and miscarriage.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:22 AM
0

No, you're basing your claims on ignoring the reality that potentiality =/= actuality and that there's no child present. That's the point of the debate. No, next to my over-sized box of frozen sleep. ;P I suspect it's with the unicorns. It's about as real as them. Okay, then which is it? The evidence suggests that you are lying.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:19 AM
1

So apparently you don't understand the US legal system.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:18 AM
0

It would not be manslaughter, it would be natural death. Natural deaths are not investigated by the cops and do not result in criminal charges.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:15 AM
0

You don't know what evidence is, as proven by your silly beliefs. Evidently I do, because I'm the only one basing my claims on evidence. My superior intelligence. Do you keep it next to the miniature unicorns? Nah, I just read the lies you wrote. XD A lie, by definition, is something one knows to be false. By claiming that I am willfully spreading falsehoods you are claiming knowledge about my knowledge. You have said that knowing the contents of another's mind would require psychic powers. You'…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:15 AM
1

Actually, it would be death by natural causes. Deaths by natural causes are not a police matter.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:11 AM
0

Yes I do. That's not what the evidence suggests. You don't know the contents of my mind, crazy person. What contents? You're the only liar between the two of us, lying dumbass. Now you're claiming to know the contents of my mind.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:10 AM
0

Again, you don't seem to understand the concept of natural death.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:08 AM
1

You need to stop lying to yourself. I know it's a very popular idea, dumbass. Evidently not, because you don't even know what the idea is. You need to ask your doctor for some pills to relieve you of the impression that you're psychic enough to know the contents of my mind. You don't need to be psychic to understand emptiness. I never mentioned Columbus, I cited no myths. Why are you lying to me?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:08 AM
0

Either it's a person from conception and therefore a miscarriage is accidental murder of a person through abandonment (manslaughter), More accurately, it would be death through natural causes, which is not a police matter. Stop ignoring the realities of your own belief, dumbass. Insulting me and lying to me is not going to change reality.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:04 AM
0

Irrelevant. You cited the popularity of your idea as veracity, I cited the popularity of it as evidence that you don't even know what the debate is about. You need to stop lying to people who are smarter than you. I showed you why that's very dumb By using an old myth that turned out to be untrue. Columbus was not a genius, he was an idiot and all those stupid church people knew stuff he didn't. Get over it.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:03 AM
1

Either it's a person from conception and miscarriage is accidental murder (manslaughter), Natural deaths, by definition, are not manslaughter. They're natural deaths. We don't investigate 80 year olds dying in their sleep, why would we investigate miscarriages?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:00 AM
1

The popularity of an idea doesn't grant it veracity. No doubt. Everyone once thought the world was flat Actually, the round nature of the earth was figured out a long time ago.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:59 AM
1

Dumbass, either it's a person at fertilization and miscarriage is accidental murder (Manslaughter we call it) Natural deaths are not manslaughter. Law is not your strong suit.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:56 AM
0

Moron, claiming a fetus is a person is mistaking potentiality for actuality. There's a lot of people who would disagree with you on that point.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:54 AM
1

Dumbass, you don't get to have it both ways. Either it's a person from conception and a miscarriage is parental abandonment You don't seem to understand that death by natural causes is not a concern of the state.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:53 AM
3

It's not a disagreement. Fetuses aren't people. Potentiality =/= Actuality. Abortion opponents don't claim fetuses are potential people. If they did, you'd have a point.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:52 AM
1

The above is you. You say it's not okay to abandon your child to die Correct. and then you say a miscarriage isn't an abandonment. That would be death by natural causes, which is not a police matter.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:51 AM
5

I don't care what ignorant people think. Fetuses aren't actual people. That's where the disagreement lies. I do indeed understand their silly, false position, Why do you keep lying to me?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:48 AM
3

So suddenly it's okay for the woman to abandon her child to die? No, but I never said it was.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:47 AM
3

Abortion opponents don't think fetuses are potential people. They think fetuses are actual people. If you actually understood pro-life arguments (you don't. You lied when you claimed you did) you would get this.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:45 AM
5

Further, your ignorance creates a BIG moral problem for you since 50-80% of all fertilized zygotes fail to implant and are flushed away, since that's a human/person in your eyes you're now required to force the woman to consent to a search of her discharge using every available medical means and then forcing her to carry it to term, Why? The cops don't bother doing autopsies on everyone that dies, they only do them on people they think were victims of homicide. Natural deaths do not incur police…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:44 AM
9

Anyone trying to exercise their right to free speech on UC Santa Barbara's campus needs to be prepared to exercise their right to self defense.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:43 AM
6

One needn't be religious to oppose abortion. One simply needs to believe life begins at conception.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:40 AM
5

One person doesn't have the right to stay alive using another's body against their will. Parents are charged with crimes when they abandon their children to die. You do know that, right? There's a special relationship between parents and kids. Further, your ignorance creates a BIG moral problem for you since 50-80% of all fertilized zygotes fail to implant and are flushed away, since that's a human/person in your eyes you're now required to force the woman to consent to a search of her discharge…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:40 AM
0

She's a terrorist. That's really all there is to say about this.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:37 AM
2

They were already unhinged. Hence their belief in rape culture.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 10:13 PM
1

Karl Marx has been dead for over 130 years and people are still taking his ideas seriously.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 09:26 PM
22

This just proves what we already knew. Feminists hate men.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:09 PM
2

Chiefs are cops Chiefs are also bureaucrats who don't want to deal with lawsuits. And if they've got an idiot running around, they want to keep him under control in order to prevent those lawsuits.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 05:47 PM
13

As with every profession, there are some bad cops, and we have chronicled police misconduct that undermines the rights of the innocent. Since police officers will have the power and the duty to activate the recording, there is a potential for the rare bad cop to fail to turn it on when he abuses his power. Any officer who always seems to have his camera off whenever he's dealing with people is going to be in for a long and uncomfortable talk with the chief.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:16 PM
10

Why do men's issues have to be in opposition to feminism rather than coexisting with feminism? It's not like feminists hate men or something. I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them -Robin Morgan. The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each individual male in the patriarchy is aware of his relative power in the scheme of things.... He knows that his actions are supported b…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:23 PM
6

Forget prisons, they're ignoring the very real rape of males outside of prison. In fact, feminists have gone out of their way to protect female rapists and hide the existence of male victims.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:13 PM
10

It's not just rapists. Pretty much all crime in a given society will be perpetrated by a small number of people who habitually engage in predatory behavior. If there are 100 rapes in a city, you're not looking for 100 rapists. You're looking for 30 psychopaths.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:23 AM
0

Fuck the police. More often than not they're just a bunch of dumb fucks Smarter than the general populace, actually.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:16 AM
1

Whether or not the cops are in legal trouble depends on exactly what they did and exactly what the dead guy dead. If they were in a situation where OC spray was reasonable and the spray caused his death, they're not in any trouble.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:15 AM
2

Here's the thing about the justice system: it works. It works better than any other system known to man. Are there flaws? Yes, the system's run by people. But having the investigations carried out by impartial cops, the trial run by an impartial judge, and the verdict handed down by an impartial jury produces the best results for everyone. Mob justice and familial retribution are not effective ways of handling crime. The court system is. Are some cops awful bastards? Yes. But a career police off…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:17 AM
1

RAINN admitted the truth that we've known for years (rape is something done by an incredibly small part of the population) and now feminists are mad. So much for them not thinking all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:13 AM
-2

Is that how your read because I read in context. Exactly why do you think he went out of his way to trash this women for being black? If a white women did exactly the same thing would he follow that with a similar diatribe about how lousy white women are? He actually might. People of the far right like /r/theredpill usually dislike American white women. They prefer Asian and East European women who they suspect are easier to control. Yes, they're that far off in racistville.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 01:10 AM
59

Just remember kids, feminists don't really hate us, because they're always telling us they don't really hate us and that we're really the bad guys here for pointing out that they obviously do hate us.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 08:21 PM
-1

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure employing violence against children because you dislike their political views is known as "terrorism."
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:47 AM
2

Not for lack of trying: women attempt it three times as often. [1] Men are more likely to succeed because we are trained for violence As any cop or soldier can tell you, the average man is not trained for violence. At all. Playing COD will not make you into a leet sniper in real life, and trying to do anything with guns you saw in Halo will (at best) hospitalize you. The first thing to say is that if trained soldiers sent to engage in imperial wars of aggression can be called “victims” at all, t…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:40 PM
4

Their currently looking at DNA evidence from swabbing her vagina, That should exonerate you.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:37 AM
5

And why is it, that despite feminist civil wars over many of the issues addressed here, I only ever see an acknowledgement of the gender essentialist radical feminist kind? Everyone else, of course, is reduced to a NAFALT. Because at the end of the day, almost all feminists are like that. No matter what "wave" they claim to be, they almost all do advocate misandry. It wasn't Dworkin or Solanas who came up with "Schrodinger's rapist" after all.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:01 AM
10

He admits to the human sacrifice of children. Really? Let's look at what he actually said about the Aztec practice of human sacrifice. Moreover, the Aztec sacrifices, if I recall correctly, were almost exclusively warriors. These folks knew that being part of a warrior class came with the risk of being sacrificed to gods, and maybe gods they didn't support. Then when I pointed out what the Aztecs really did, he said this about sources confirming Aztec practices. Don't you think this lens of mora…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:34 PM
9

I'm So Tired of Men Always Being Right About Everything Stop being stupid, and maybe you'll get to be right some of the time. I'm trying to write about how a certain kind of male tone of authoritativeness of opinion is very triggering to me as someone who grew up feeling voiceless around sexist religious racist Republican homophobic men. People tend to express their opinions, and this triggers you? What are you, a five year old? But the men in my life seemed to feel so qualified, so sure of thei…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:10 PM
11

Oh yeah, they also pretend that the Nation of Islam is good and saintly and would never associate with those evil honky racists. Ignore the fact that they invited a neo-nazi to speak at one of their meetings, black racists are good people. Only white racists are bad racists.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:22 PM
7

Do you have any examples of that? Pretending the Aztecs were saintly, just and wise people who were unfairly maligned by those wicked honkies. Seriously, the Aztecs.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:13 PM
12

The issue is that she made a fuck load of money with that art. That she stole from a female artist. That's really the best part of the whole story.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:10 PM
0

It is when they're two of the most destructive men in all of human history.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:01 PM
0

You're the one trying to pretend the guy who killed to enforce atheism was religious.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:27 AM
0

I'm black. You wouldn't be the only black man who hates white people.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:13 AM
0

As I said. Your kind always devolve to this. What, now you white people?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:09 AM
0

Not remotely. Democracy was invented by the Greeks. True. You know, the people who had institutionalized slavery. Slaves are not true, rational, Greek men. Every true Greek man knew this. I never said it did. You most certainly did. You gave this definition of religion. 3:the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices Christianity does not have a particular set of beliefs and practices. You would know this if you were smart. Or even knew anything about Christianity.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:03 AM
0

That is not a belief of democracy. It's not even a necessary component of a democracy. Nothing about democracy says men are equal, or have to be equal. Actually, democracy depends on it. That definition didn't say united. Christianity does not have one set of beliefs. If you were smart (big if) you'd understand that.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:57 AM
0

No. Because democracy is not a set of beliefs. Equality of men. No, because words have multiple definitions. Let's look at the definition you tried to use. 3:the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices Given that Christianity most definitely does not have a united set of beliefs and practices, it is obvious that Christianity is not a religion. Why are you trying to pretend that it is?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:30 AM
0

Dictionary.com Definition 2:a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: By that logic democracy is a religion. 3:the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices By that logic Christianity is not a religion.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:21 AM
0

As I said, it's referred to as a cult of personality. Which is not a religion. At all. You do realize that religion does not necessarily entail the supernatural correct? Yeah, actually, they do. That's kind of the point.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:05 AM
0

What I said was that they created their own religions with them as the gods. Except they didn't do that. Stalin didn't claim to be the supernatural ruler of Mt. Olympus. Indeed he denied that supernatural things even existed.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:09 AM
0

They did create religions. They turned the state into a religion with them as the god. No, they were atheists. This is not up for debate.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:56 AM
0

However humans with religion are far more dangerous. Chairman Mao and Joseph Stalin never existed?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:08 AM
-5

Religion is dangerous, harmful, and irrational. Not really. Humans are dangerous, whether they are religious or not.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:15 AM
1

And, this, ladies and gentleman is what a GED can do for you. Even if that were true (it's not) it alone would not make me incorrect.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:44 AM
1

Is that the best a cretin like you can do? It's better than what you have accomplished, so I would scale back on the insults were I in your shoes.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:38 AM
1

Cite 1 tenured Professor of Ancient History and/or Middle Eastern History at a major University that teaches that "jesus" is a legitimate, proven historical figure. All of them. Even they disagree with you Really? I should mention that there are many more scholars who believe in the historicity of Jesus. If it were just a matter of numbers, the believers in his historicity would win by a great majority. In other words, everyone who's anyone admits that Jesus existed.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:28 AM
1

Here are the folks at /r/askhistorians explaining just how stupid you are. You can start apologizing now.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:49 PM
0

"In 2000, Martin Pickford and Brigitte Senut discovered in the Tugen Hills of Kenya a 6-million-year-old bipedal hominin which they named Orrorin tugenensis. Which is not part of the genus Homo. Orrorin tugenensis might or might not be closely related to humans, that question has not been settled. NO accredited, legitimate, qualified historians say that "jesus" existed. That's actually what every last one of them says. Borderline insane makers of internet documentaries are the ones who disagree.…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 09:01 PM
3

The earth is approximately 4.5 BILLION YEARS OLD. Radiometric dating proves this. True, but irrelevant. There is absolutely no legitimate, academically accepted peer reviewed proof that "jesus" ever existed. None whatsoever. Not only is that a lie, it's the exact opposite of the truth. Historians are in agreement that there was guy named Jesus running around in Judea approximately 2000 years ago. Evolution is a scientific fact. Get over it. Our ancestors are over 6 Million years old. That's a li…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:21 PM
1

That depends entirely on where you are, how much you have, and the cop who found it.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 11:12 PM
2

Eric Holder needs more uneducated people to vote him into office. Prisoners are perfect. Eric Holder is the Attorney General. He is not elected, he is appointed. And given that Obama can't run for president anymore, we can safely say he's not going to be Attorney General for much longer.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 06:35 PM
1

Abortion doctors are not getting killed. There have been a total of 8 killings of abortion doctors since Roe v. Wade. That's less than 2 hours worth of traffic deaths.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:37 AM
4

If there's a link between the porn industry and human trafficking, I'm sure the FBI would like to know about it. Ask them to fill out this form. Do remind them that giving false information to the feds is a crime. But I'm sure that won't be a problem. After all, they're not liars, right? That's the only way there would be an issue.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:35 AM
3

They can't ban hate groups, but they can and do track them in case any of them are planning to commit terrorism.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:41 PM
7

The feds do a far better job of tracking real hate groups than the SPLC does.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 06:04 PM
14

So you're saying that all those people who got falsely accused of rape weren't really victims of false rape accusations?
/r/MensRights02/03/14 10:18 PM
23

BECAUSE I'M A FEMINIST. These are feminist issues. And they are being worked on—by men and women, feminist and not—in egalitarian, caring, open-air spaces, where every word and action isn't just misogyny in disguise. Really? Let's look at what feminists actually think of men. I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them -Robin Morgan. The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:53 PM
32

The MRM's attempts to frame the "false rape accusation" argument as some sort of underserved underdog in this conversation is a baldfaced, bad-faith lie. Look up the Innocence Project.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 07:15 PM
1

How so? "White" and "nonwhite" are fluid terms in the US.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:27 PM
1

On top of that, it's not for "boys", it's for "minorities". Programs to help minorities generally stand the challenge of law, which is why government employers can use affirmative action.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:23 AM
15

The president is admitting that boys have value? Progress!
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:21 AM
3

Al Sharpton is a somewhat of a joke but he is not a racist. He is a known anti-Semite.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:11 AM
0

The Obama derangement syndrome is some crazy racial stuff. Somewhat. Remember that Americans love conspiracy theories. A fair number of people hate Obama merely because he's a Democrat, much as a fair number of Democrats just knew George Bush planned 9/11.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:11 AM
0

Obama is trying to do something for boys and is admitting that men can have issues. This is not a bad thing. Is it focused on black kids? Yes. But the fact is that over 70% of black kids are being raised by single parents. Black kids, generally speaking, are getting screwed harder than white kids. I'm with /u/edtastic. This initiative is a good one. From an earlier posting. For some reason I am skeptical that a program the president supports will actually accomplish something positive. It is alm…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:07 AM
7

Here is how Nicola Scott draws Nightwing. And here is how she draws Superman, just in case you thought that it was a one time thing. So much for males never being objectified.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:57 AM
6

Because in middle eastern countries where cruel and unusual punishment is a spectator sport, women are so well respected.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:14 PM
17

"Men's Rights" Activists Are Trying to Redefine the Meaning of Rape Given that the current legal definitions may include a 17 year old boy having sex with a 16 year old girl but may not include a 30 year old woman and a 14 year old boy (every state gets their own definition), we do need to redefine rape. They claim that rape statistics are overinflated, They are. that female-on-male sexual assaults are ignored or sneered at They are. and—above all—that false rape reports are a far larger problem…
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:30 AM
35

Even if Ms. Faircloth was not truthful, vilifying discussion of sexual assault by filing such a lawsuit only adds to the problem of under-reporting that enables sexual assault to proliferate at alarming rates Punishing liars does not discourage the truthful.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:17 AM
1

We've known for years that many children "remember" sexual abuse that never happened.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 05:22 PM
10

EVAW’s director Holly Dustin acknowledges this - but claims it is only because demonstrating such a connection would be unethical. “You can’t show boys pornography and then see if they rape someone.” Actually we've been doing this for the twenty years or so, and we've seen the rate of sexual assault decline by over 50%. So evidently porn does not turn ordinary boys into rapists. You know, the same way Batman comics don't turn them gay, D&D doesn't make them into occultists, rap music doesn't mak…
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:43 PM
3

I don't think she gets the idea of sex between two loving, consenting adults (most likely because she was abused, which I am sure led to her disgusting view of sex). She said she was abused. She was also mentally ill and prone to delusions later in life (such that even other feminists stopped believing some of her stories). So it may not be that "mugging studies" would be a proper analogy. It may be that "alien abduction studies" would be more accurate.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:39 PM
4

It has won through blatant sexism - it targets only porn directed at males Porn directed at straight males. You'll notice radfems never talk about gay porn when they talk about how porn exploits women. It's almost as though they have a particular hate for male heterosexuality. One wonders why.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:36 PM
3

Maybe you could claim Communists were up to something, but gays? They thought the two were linked, that's why. J. Edgar Hoover was paranoid.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:27 PM
2

I didn't say "they", but presumably "they" would be intelligence agencies or law enforcement agencies like the CIA or FBI. GCHQ was specifically mentioned. The CIA and FBI are primarily national security agencies. They don't have time to be dealing with us.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:26 PM
5

David Wong already admitted that he hates women and he has tried to project this hatred onto other men. Why listen to anything he has to say? He's a dumbass with mommy issues.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:36 PM
-4

Given the general fall in violent crime since the 90s, this is not particularly surprising.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 09:29 PM
5

see above. socially easier. How is it "easy" to leave an abusive relationship when a crazy woman is threatening harm to your or yourself if you do so?
/r/MensRights24/02/14 06:24 PM
16

If a female does so to her boyfriend, he is 'whipped' for obeying and if he does whatever he wants he may very well be able to laugh it off with his friends about how much of a 'bitch' she is. And if she decides to throw a vase at his head when he disobeys, then what?
/r/MensRights24/02/14 06:16 AM
12

"They" are feminists, not women. And yes, they did.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 03:41 AM
16

Anyone who is here to simply hate on women need to get the fuck over themselves and stop perpetuating the cycle that got us here in the first place. That's like saying the Allies shouldn't have "perpetuated the cycle" by storming Normandy. They started it, not us. It isn't our fault that they chose to be sexist. And don't even bother pretending you're here to fight the power. What makes you think I'm not? Fake fucks like you pretend feminism has all the power, When did I say that? so you never n…
/r/MensRights23/02/14 01:48 AM
7

If the vast majority of men engaged in any violent behavior society would not be able to function.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 01:43 AM
26

It's not like feminists hate men or something. I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them -Robin Morgan. The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each individual male in the patriarchy is aware of his relative power in the scheme of things.... He knows that his actions are supported by the twin pillars of the State of man - the brotherhood ritual of political exigency and the b…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:04 PM
9

In that culture, it is considered particularly humiliating for a woman to beat a man like that.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 05:15 PM
1

Have a look at the "We Are Confronting Lad Culture" picture. It turns out the attendees at this summit looked... pretty much the way you'd expect them to.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:20 PM
1

Temple says: “I would love it if all Student Unions made consent workshops compulsory for their union and society leaders.” So they do think all men are rapists. This surprises nobody. Zero tolerance to sexual harrassment, advertising campaigns and rules around training sports captains. We need to change democratic structures to guarantee women are represented at university and in unions And they hate democracy. Why should we take them seriously?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:10 PM
1

The problem with "lad culture" is that it's so seemingly low lever, as you say, it's just lads "having a laugh". Unfortunately many women are saying that they have been made feel uncomfortable due to it, and many men have said that they used to be like that but now realised the damage they were doing. Which tells us that both the women and the men involved with this are spineless and worthless.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:06 PM
1

Women are telling you they feel uncomfortable at how a certain subculture views them, and treats them, and they try to change that. If you don't like what someone's saying, ignore them.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:05 PM
0

Do you really think that federal prosecutors are so good at their job that 99% of everyone they bring to trial are guilty? I doubt they bother with the ones they're not sure about. Not to mention the absurd and tyrannical plea deals. They're actually quite useful.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:17 AM
0

Which does not necessarily mean the system isn't functioning. There's a problem if a lot of convicted people turn out to be innocent.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 12:43 AM
2

It's hard to call myself a male feminist at university. It's also hard to call yourself a segregationist. I blame lad culture All this tells me is that "lad culture" is awesome. And where does the idea that men cannot be feminists come from? Could it be the misandry? I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them -Robin Morgan. The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each individu…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:36 PM
1

I'm not sure that Deutsche Physik is a good analogy, because the movement, whilst being nationalistic, used the sprouting NS sentiment to further their scientific goals, it wasn't based on them. While at the start they just rejected the "overuse" of English terms and the removal of German contributions via questionable translations in the anglosphere (the "x-ray" translation of "roentgen ray" is the example most often brought up), they aligned themselves, especially under Lenard and Stark, with …
/r/MensRights20/02/14 06:54 PM
1

the ASA points out that “there is no effective or substantive academic freedom for Palestinian students and scholars under conditions of Israeli occupation.” The Palestinian territory has internet access, any academic in that region is free to submit his work to some journal that is not stationed in Israel.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 05:39 PM
3

Sandra Y.L. Korn ’14, a Crimson editorial writer, is a joint history of science and studies of women, gender and sexuality concentrator You'd think someone who studies the history of science would know what "Deutsch Physik" was and why it proves that politics should never meet up with academia. But that would only be if you were smart.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 05:36 PM
5

Instead, I would like to propose a more rigorous standard: one of “academic justice.” When an academic community observes research promoting or justifying oppression, it should ensure that this research does not continue. That standard means nothing. What does it mean to "promote or justify oppression?" That standard could be used to shut down anything.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:20 PM
2

She's making this all up.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:38 AM
2

The universal male decency we keep hearing about is largely a myth. Given that our society actually exists, we can say that male decency is in fact the rule. Sure, most men might not be bad. But it takes more than 'not being bad' to be 'actually good'. So most men are Lawful Neutral then? Whenever conversation is raised about patriarchy, violence and the lack of equality that still permeates our society You're in New Zealand. You've got a lower murder rate than Britain. "Violence" is a nice joke…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 02:41 PM
5

It's called bacha bazi.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 02:38 PM
18

The universal male decency we keep hearing about is largely a myth. Given that our society actually exists, we can say that male decency is in fact the rule. Sure, most men might not be bad. But it takes more than 'not being bad' to be 'actually good'. So most men are Lawful Neutral then? Whenever conversation is raised about patriarchy, violence and the lack of equality that still permeates our society You're in New Zealand. You've got a lower murder rate than Britain. "Violence" is a nice joke…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:24 PM
10

Here is what appears to be the faculty page for the teacher of that course. It seems the University of Maryland is still employing her for some reason.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 10:15 PM
4

They've been wrong about everything else, it's no surprise they'd be wrong about Woody Allen.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 12:10 PM
5

From the comments. But it’s a very delicate/sensitive topic and Taranto completely fails validate the experience of female victims in the first instance. You don't get it, do you? His argument is that when two drunk college students choose to screw, there is no victim.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:54 PM
25

As I mentioned above, the use of female Red Cross volunteers does not change the power dynamic of the event: women's hard labour has always been used up for free, while the authority - the introducing, the panel speaking, the definitive declaiming, the star spot on the bill/invite - is reserved for men. If you could read, you would have noticed that they invited several women. It just so happens that none of them were able to attend.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:48 PM
4

If it's gotten to the point where they're whining about an investment fad, you know they've run out of real stuff to talk about.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:45 PM
6

In the past "Witch-Hunt" was associated with women but now it is associated with men. Which just proves how little the average American knows about history. The people hunted as witches were not all female. Actually, most gendercides in history have targeted males.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 08:45 PM
5

Biologically, the evidence suggests that it should be the opposite, which is that women should be larger than males. In some species males are larger than females. In some females are larger. Humans are one of the species where males are larger. This is not that hard to comprehend. Well, unless you're a feminist.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 08:30 AM
1

Actually, it's not a "delusion." First off, very few children get raped and tortured here in the US. Second, criminals don't just commit one crime then stop. They generally keep committing crimes until they get stopped by someone. So one criminal can do an awful lot of crime. Meaning that, as a general rule, men in fact do not rape or torture children. Believing Allen is a pedophile would mean no longer swallowing his ridiculous theory that his ex-wife Mia Farrow planted the story of the abuse i…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 04:13 AM
3

But feminists are our friends. Or at least that's what they keep telling us.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 04:04 AM
8

And I can ask, why is it that famous men are so rarely convicted of the rapes and abuses with which they are charged? Because they turn out to be innocent rather frequently. Women they don’t know (against a background of a deeply misogynistic media which constantly spins them the story that women lie about sex, and they lie about rape), That's not "spin," that's the truth. I wish I had one to give. I’m starting to suspect that the jury system may not be the best one when it comes to judging the …
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:40 PM
9

Just remember, NAFALT. They really do care about us, honest. It's not like they've ever lied before or anything.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:26 AM
2

It scares me that the women who post stuff like that could one day be on a jury. Posting this crap could probably get you barred from jury service.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 06:54 PM
1

If we accept the premise, rape culture exists at universities, we are left with the questions: Who is responsible and why? Most of the students at universities are women. Just saying.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:50 AM
2

"We never gave a shit when it was men dying. But now that women are dying, WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?! WHERE ARE THE MENZ?" Rose tinted glasses. Old school mobsters probably weren't nearly as "honorable" as people think.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:12 AM
4

It was never in our culture to do violence to the women and children in our families and communities, it was always our responsibility to protect them. That's why it's called "anti-social" behavior.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:08 AM
3

"Do they think we are carrying around thousands of dollars? I don't. We have makeup. We have tissues," said Martin, whose Urban Racing School is just steps away from where Amber was mortally wounded. "I don't get what they think we are carrying in our purses that's worth so much money to them." Criminals are stupid. This just in: water still wet.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:03 AM
17

Most mugging victims are male. Funny how no one cared until it started happening to women.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:02 AM
7

Anyone who disagrees with the presumption of innocence needs to be deported to North Korea, so they can see why we have it.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:58 PM
1

Sic semper tyrannis. That's really the only reply one can give to something like that.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:50 PM
1

It's not plausible.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:19 AM
1

They have in fact claimed that Charlemagne was black.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:15 AM
1

Let me rephrase that: every respected major historical figure.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:32 AM
2

There's a fair number of people who subscribe to the idea that every major figure in history was black, and that white people covered it up somehow. It's called Afrocentrism.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:14 PM
2

Mmmmm, no, and you're being an intentionally dense shithead for no particular reason. Ancient Rome would be, shocker, ancient. That's why we call it "ancient Rome." Given that modern America considers itself contiguous enough with Ancient Rome to use their language English is a Germanic language. The Latin/French parts were brought in by invading Francized vikings. We use some Latin as terms of legal art, but English itself is not a Romance language. Further, believing yourself contiguous does n…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:13 PM
1

The US is a nonviolent country with a hysterical fear of violence. This has been known for a long time.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 09:21 AM
9

In other cultures and times they would have taken you off up into the hills and returned you scarred or enlightened or both. Or not at all. Not at all was always a possibility. The festival is – obviously – the idea of a woman, Jude Kelly, artistic director at the Southbank Centre. So men have no right to even say what they find attractive in women, but women have the right to define what men are. Feminist "logic" in a nutshell. Despite its advertised Neanderthal acronym – BAM – this was not an …
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:49 AM
11

A frequent question we get on this sub is why MRAs oppose feminism. It's because for the last 50 years, custody has been one of the most significant men's rights issues, and feminists have always been our biggest opponent in that area. That's just one of the reasons.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:44 PM
1

Frankly , I sincerely doubt that. What is trafficking ? Forcing somebody to go somewhere against their will ? Where is this international ring bringing foreign prostitutes into the US ? Why is there no evidence of it ? The Mexican cartels would be the most likely candidate.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:28 PM
1

They used to claim that men were secretly watching and producing snuff films. There is no lie so deranged or so patently false that they will not lie about it.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:27 PM
5

Jackson Katz says call it "men's violence against women." Women are known to commit domestic violence. Katz urged men to stop being passive bystanders. Often, men get defensive about the subject of domestic violence. They blame it on a few bad apples. The problem, Katz said, is that everyone, male and female, has a responsibility to build a culture that doesn't accept sexism, objectification of women or abuse. Active bystanders get brutally beaten by criminals.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:23 PM
6

Because it blames ordinary men for stuff they didn't do, encourages them to do stupid stuff, and obscures the reality of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:13 PM
3

So...why has this been put into this sub then? And why are most of the comments saying this seminar is a bad thing? Because this seminar is a bad thing. What will it accomplish?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:59 PM
9

"I think we should try and stop people being violent against women" "THIS INFRINGES ON MY RIGHTS!" We, as a society, have hired people to professionally deal with wife beaters. They're called cops. It's not my job to brawl with violent people. Why not try "Gee, that is a problem, but violence against men is also a thing and lets try to solve that as well". Because it's not our job to fight every lunatic that comes along.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:34 PM
20

Jackson Katz says call it "men's violence against women." Because lesbians never commit domestic abuse. "By focusing on men as perpetrators or potential perpetrators, most men shut you off right away," Katz said. "They say, 'I'm not the problem. I'm a good guy.' What we need is more men with the courage and the strength and the integrity to speak up." Do you know what happens to people who stand up to psychopaths? They get their asses beat. Once leaders, especially those in stereotypical masculi…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:00 PM
8

Given the existence of Ciudad Juarez, we can safely say the cartels have no problem with butchering women.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:06 AM
2

I really can't tolerate this. To any feminist reading who is prominent in general feminist discussions, I urge you to actually DO something about men's issues, They have. Who do you think came up with the Tender Years Doctrine? Oh, you meant something positive? Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:40 PM
13

So if a girl doesn't feel comfortable working in a group with men, that's discrimination? If you're taking a sociology class, expect to have people of the opposite sex in it. That's not unreasonable.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:35 PM
14

Unless you're a male victim of rape by a woman, in which case, fat chance getting any prosecutor in the country to take your case. Not only is that the case, but a male DV victim who calls for help is more likely to get arrested than he is to receive aid.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:32 AM
3

even though violence, drugs and sexual abuse of minors do not go hand in hand with the sale of avocados, Farming is twice as dangerous as firefighting. In 2002 Germany decriminalized brothels but since then has “found no measurable improvements detectable in achieving social protection for prostitutes, improving working conditions, encouraging prostitutes to exit the industry, or reducing crime.” (From a news source not cited by Perrin: Germany’s new leniency encouraged prostitutes from abroad. …
/r/MensRights30/01/14 09:25 PM
2

It appears the kind of person willing to do crime for profit (as opposed to just because it was fun) is generally smart enough not to tape themselves doing a capital crime then try to distribute it to a large number of people.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 09:17 PM
5

It's interesting really. First they go on about snuff films. Then it's the Super Bowl causing domestic violence. Then it's the Super Bowl causing human trafficking. For some reason we Americans keep believing what feminists tell us even though it is now evident that most everything they say is either a lie or fantasy.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:24 PM
12

Yeah, I know there's some radfems out there, but saying that SRS is representative of feminism is like saying TRP is representative of MRAs. There are a substantial number of MRAs who aren't like TRP. Where are the good feminists? The linked guy said that he likes the idea of the men's rights movement but doesn't like how people on here blame all their problems on feminism. Feminism is the cause of many of the problems.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:00 PM
11

Most people are not feminists.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:40 PM
8

There is an old urban legend which claims that there are gangs kidnapping women, murdering them on film, and selling the footage. There have been one or two maniacs who filmed their crimes, some criminal and terror groups film executions for intimidation, but there's no evidence of commercial snuff films actually being real. Steinem apparently doesn't know this, because she thinks they are real.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:39 PM
9

Gloria Steinem believes in snuff films. She's not the brightest bulb.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:25 PM
26

First, I’ve given great weight to history because my son deals in absolutes. (i.e., It doesn’t count if it’s just your opinion, Mom.) So about six months ago, I hung up a collage by artist Michael Albert in my kids’ bathroom that quotes the 19th Amendment. I’m serious. In all sorts of cut out letters it reads: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.” The collage is a brilliant array of hundreds of…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:10 PM
71

Allow me to take a crack at it. The Men's Rights movement is one of the most disapointing examples of wasted potential I've ever seen. It's disapointing because hidden amongst their profanity laced anti-feminist tirades there are actually some really important points; points that should be highlighted and have attention paid to them. Things like child custody and male rape victims, where men are often unfairly or unequally treated, are often swept under the carpet because they're a little too cl…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:40 PM
1

But the people posting here are not feminists, they're MRAs. MRAs who believe life begins at conception are going to view what this guy did as murder. 14 years as a pled out sentence for murder is not an excessive sentence.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:48 PM
6

Don’t blame our boys for the men we turn them into Society didn't put a gun to Ted Bundy's head and make him kill people. Boys, boys – what is the matter with you? Can it really be that a third of girls are groped or suffer some form of sexual assault while still at school? Only one third? I assumed pretty much everyone on the planet had had someone grab their ass at some point. In other words, they want the law to make it compulsory to teach boys how to treat girls. Because if laws backed by 20…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:46 PM
1

Why? Because of how it looks? You need to have more courage. A fair number of MRAs disagree with Roe v. Wade and believe life begins at conception.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:34 PM
1

They did. Roe v. Wade only applies when the mother wants it to apply.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:33 PM
1

Does anyone know what he pled guilty to that got him that much time? It says they dropped the murder charge in exchange for his plea. I'm wondering what crime carries 14 years after you've pled guilty.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:32 PM
1

That is a ridiculously high sentence in a country where women get a handful of days for raping underage boys. I find it interesting that they were planning to charge him with murder. Apparently Roe v. Wade has been overturned and no one told me about it.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:30 PM
1

Just remember, not all feminists are like that, and we really need to work with them. After all, we don't want to alienate potential allies just because they think we're all subhuman rapists.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:27 PM
1

The British government investigated the "6%" figure and found it to be a total lie.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:28 PM
2

Not trying to knit pick but wasn't this a brilliant idea by a bunch if old white dudes to punish a bunch if non violent black tween drug offenders? Nope. It was brilliant idea by a whole bunch of old white guys to fight violent crime in the 60s and 70s.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:58 AM
1

As a male you are suppose to be either filthy rich, good looking and incredibly smart (batman, iron man) or a bad boy(wolverine) or a fucking god. Batman's not exactly tiny either.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:54 AM
3

There's a big difference, though. Most women are completely incapable of reaching the image of comic book characters without serious, invasive surgery. Any male can, with hard work and correct diet/nutrition, reach their natural maximum potential of lean muscle mass, and look like a superhero, physique-wise. Not without serious steroid use.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:30 AM
6

This isn't a fair comparison because being a muscle bound giant is just as much of a male fantasy as is having a bunch of scantily clad huge breasted supermodels to hang out with. You don't think women want to be seen as attractive? Then explain why plastic surgery is a billion dollar industry.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:29 AM
4

To be totally fair, Duke Nukem is supposed to be a joke.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:20 AM
18

But who are the "trolls" and can anything be done to stop them? Don't feed the trolls. It's really not that hard.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:46 PM
2

This article fails to mention feminist myths regarding the Super Bowl. They used to claim it caused domestic violence. Now they claim it causes a spike in human trafficking.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:58 AM
0

There are a lot of Holodomor deniers on badhistory. It's interesting that the leftist conspiracy theories have so much traction there.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:53 AM
1

IF badhistory wasn't already infected with the SRS/SJW mentality. I get screamed at on that subreddit all the time for posting here. Even though most of what I say there is, objectively speaking, true. It's rather interesting that a subreddit supposedly dedicated to debunking bad history will defend Ward Churchill just because someone who thinks males are human beings attacked him.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:53 AM
1

Ok, you are the mra version of a pedestrian feminist, emotional and dishonest reasoning and claiming I said things I did not say. Let's look at what you said initially. It means the study of rape in the culture, with the emphasis on ways it might be subtly condoned or more likely to happen. In other words: it's a branch of sociology. Now let's look at what you said the second time. I also want to take a moment to address the definition of the word "normalized", since some people seem to have a h…
/r/MensRights23/01/14 10:17 PM
1

I also want to take a moment to address the definition of the word "normalized", since some people seem to have a hard time with that, and think that rape culture refers to a culture that likes or condones rape. Within sociology, the term "normalization"[10] refers to a process through which ideas come to seem as "normal" and become a natural part of everyday life. There are 300 million people in the United States. If you can't understand that some of them are going to be violent, you need to be…
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:53 PM
1

How would you know that? So, where have feminists used the term "rape culture" in the manner you are suggesting they do? If you believe that all these people are saying that the whole culture literally and consciously promotes violent rape, you are incredibly gullible. Its too ridiculous to be true for a reason. It's also ridiculous to believe that Jews secretly run the world and that they Holocaust is a myth, yet people believe that.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 08:56 PM
1

How would you know what it is or isn't? Because feminists have never used the term in that manner.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 08:50 PM
1

It means the study of rape in the culture, with the emphasis on ways it might be subtly condoned or more likely to happen. No it doesn't. It has nothing to do with "study." "Rape culture" means "a culture that promotes rape," not "the psychology of rapists."
/r/MensRights23/01/14 08:44 PM
1

So what does it actually mean?
/r/MensRights23/01/14 08:35 PM
1

So what do you think it means?
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:55 PM
3

Here is a definition of rape culture given by feminists. Rape culture refers to the ways in which a society and its culture trivializes, rationalizes, and even condones this vicious act of violence despite being nominally against rape in the abstract. They believe our culture is pro-rape. They don't even try to hide it.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:07 PM
2

Things are only going to get worse for rapists on campus. Why do you all think there's something synonymous with rapists and other men When feminists say "rapist" there absolutely is.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:03 PM
2

The entire field of criminal psychology would beg to disagree with them. But that's probably just patriarchy or something.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:55 PM
2

(this is theorised to set up an antagonistic model for sex that makes rape more likely to happen) If that were the case we would expect rapists to be normal. They're not, so we can discard that theory.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:40 PM
4

mra's tend to believe it means they are saying the culture from the top down literally and openly supports violent rapists Because that's exactly what it means.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:39 PM
7

Shut up, and when your rights are eventually violated, find witnesses and write everything down. Then, get a civil rights lawyer. Cops have the right to do stop and frisk searches without your consent in certain circumstances.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 10:46 PM
12

So let me get this straight, she cheated on two husbands, has a history of infidelity and used one just to pay for her law school ? So why the fuck would anyone knowing that want to vote her into government office ? She fucks people over for money. What more do we ask of our politicians, anyways?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:36 PM
12

MLK was a plagiarist and adulterer. This is not news. But the guy's not remembered as a great husband or academic. If he were, these facts would cast great shadows on his legacy. He's remembered for fighting segregation, and he did that well in spite of his marital and scholastic failings.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:45 PM
33

Nicky's email address is published in the paper. respond with facts, not abuse. Let's get real. This loser wouldn't know the difference.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 10:16 AM
1

It's about as productive as arguing with a 9/11 truther.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:48 AM
1

It could be a phd in gender studies that focused on quantum theory. But that's about it.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:12 PM
3

This guy has an undergrad degree in fine arts and worked as a drummer after he got out of college. How would he have even gotten into a physics phd program?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 07:58 AM
2

There's no way this idiot has a degree in quantum physics.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 07:51 AM
0

The whale has a blog, for those curious.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:07 PM
5

Can't we all just get along? :D If feminists hadn't spent the past 40 years screaming "ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS!" that might be a valid point. But they did.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:38 AM
9

One of the arguments made for slavery in pre-civil war America actually was that slavery benefited blacks.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:10 AM
19

It's like seeing a revolutionary going to the guillotine. For a minute you're tempted to feel sorry for them, then you realize they created this mess.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:15 AM
7

Today, however, becoming a “never-never” employee is increasingly a gender-neutral fate. No it's not. Men take fewer sick days and are more likely to die on the job than women. Men are the "never-never" employees. Given the increasing insecurity of many American men, they have good reason to back feminist policies. We should back the deranged whales who think we're all rapists. What's next, are you going to ask the NAACP to come out in favor of David Duke?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:03 AM
4

His mother created in him the foe she so desperately sought to fight and defeat. Not really. She didn't create him male, and his maleness was what she hated. You'll notice he was never violent towards women. He never tried to undo suffrage. He was just male. And that was enough of a crime in his mother's twisted mind.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 03:01 AM
3

One day these women who abused their sons will find those same sons choosing their nursing homes. Who says there's no justice in the world?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:54 AM
2

For those curious as to whether feminists hate all men, this answers that question. They hate us all because we dare to exist. It matters not if we have done anything to them or if we are kin to them. We are, therefore we are to be hated. It doesn't matter who we are or what we do, all that matters to them is what we are.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:53 AM
0

We can already propel these things without using fuel. There's no friction (or, more accurately, very little friction) in space, so fuel's not actually needed once you get out of our atmosphere.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 11:25 PM
1

The American economy doesn't castrate little boys to prove a point. Feminists are not so kind.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 12:20 AM
1

Yeah, they've got way too few resources for the number of cases they get. It may well be that they just didn't get around to the OP yet.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:04 AM
12

In actual patriarchies, fathers are considered superior to mothers and so custody defaults to them.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:17 AM
5

The wolf crier went to the police station where a rape kit was performed.The police came to my house and I submitted a DNA cheek swap after lawyering up. The test was administered on 10/23/2013 and was only supposed to take 3 weeks to a month to process. Crime labs are notoriously slow.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:28 PM
3

Same old feminist claptrap. Interfering with boys development at a young age seems to a particular focus of current feminism. The biggest threat to boys at school today is not the odd playground scuffle, but these incredibly sinister "manipulators of masculinity" and the effect they may have on boys education and development. Playground scuffles don't castrate babies so they can "fix" them. People like Kimmel do.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:40 PM
2

It's not some feminists that are like that. It's some feminists that aren't.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 08:29 PM
-5

"Son, there are some women in the world who are ugly and idiotic. And you have a choice to make. Either you shag them in high school, or they grow up to be feminists. Now son, I'm not going to try to force you into this. I know I myself would never have done it. But seriously, think about it."
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:12 PM
2

It's really not that hard to understand. Any guy willing to beat his wife over a soccer game is probably going to find reasons to beat his wife the other 364 days of the year. That's how wife beaters operate. A Social Services representative said: “The tournament goes on for a whole month – this creates all sort of problems, often aggravated by alcohol, on the smallest of issues such as what programme the TV is tuned into.” Violent alcoholics getting drunk and violent? If that surprises you, you…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:55 AM
4

It used to be that people claimed domestic violence spiked on the day of the Super Bowl. Now it's sex trafficking in the months leading up to it.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 03:37 AM
0

Glad to know there's no racism in Tibet, Sri Lanka, or Rwanda. Or South Africa.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:02 PM
21

and a general indictment of America as a misogynistic “rape culture” whose men needed to be “taught” not to rape women. Imagine if this was said about a particular race of men instead of "men" as a whole. And, in October, the Ohio University campus in Athens, Ohio was rocked by charges of a public rape caught on video and posted online. Actually, the video showed two drunk students engaging in a sexual act; after it went viral, the woman went to the police, claiming she had no memory of the inci…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:17 AM
2

Malcolm X spent a good portion of his adult life believing white people were created by a literal mad scientist. Trusting this man's writings for guidance can generously be described as horribly ill advised.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 03:03 AM
2

Carrying 20 pounds of equipment is sufficient to give cops back problems. I don't want to know what carrying 100 pound loads is going to do to our (male) returning infantry vets. But hey, that's just patriarchy backfiring against men, or something. Certainly not an issue worth worrying about.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 10:25 PM
5

Whenever I hear any one arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally -Lincoln.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:57 PM
19

The average combat trooper is now carrying twice the weight a knight would have. You'd have to be an idiot to be surprised that most women can't handle it.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:07 PM
2

The average combat trooper is now carrying twice the weight a knight would have. You'd have to be an idiot to be surprised that most women can't handle it.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:07 PM
10

Hitler actually perpetrated a gendercide against males.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 06:42 PM
3

He also refers to males as "demonic."
/r/MensRights02/01/14 08:16 AM
6

"I don't know. We did not send a rapist and murderer to Iraq," Ruth said. "I don't know how he got there, but that's not what we sent." Because violent sociopaths never hide who they are when they're around law abiding people.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 08:10 AM
3

For those curious, the answer is that most anyone (male or female) will do most anything if asked to by an authority figure. It turns out that most people basically do what they're told. Whether it's to not murder your neighbors or to turn them in for being Jewish.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 07:58 AM
2

He's an anthropologist.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 07:54 AM
14

Just remember, feminists don't really believe that all men are rapists, honest. We need to work with them. NAFALT.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 07:07 PM
2

You have no problem with the gender wage gap. But you hate having to pay for dates. That's because the gender wage gap doesn't actually exist. There is actually a gender work gap. You insist that it’s a scientifically proven fact that men are stronger than women. That's because it is. One average, men are stronger than women. But you complain about society believing that it’s worse for a man to hit a woman than for a woman to hit a man. It's wrong to strike other people whether or not they are s…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 08:55 PM
1

How do these idiots get past the psychological testing police officers are supposed to get?
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:24 AM
6

The only people who whine about "dumb housewives" are feminists. They're the ones who say if you're financially dependent on a man, you're a traitor to women.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:11 PM
4

Here.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 11:22 PM
13

I don't understand how anyone can believe feminists like this want equality. The NAFALT defense and the context defense.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 09:45 PM
-5

Did it just not happen Pretty much.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 09:34 PM
7

I posted that to badhistory.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 07:19 PM
13

It is widely believed that human slavery was ended in the United States by Abraham Lincoln’s ‘Emancipation Proclamation’. Maybe among ten year olds, but it's not uncommon for adults to know that it was actually the Thirteenth Amendment that ended slavery. Two years later, In January of 1863, Lincoln finally made his long-awaited ‘Emancipation Proclamation.’ It was quickly perceived by the Abolitionists as… a sell-out. The document was a bitter disappointment to those who had fought for so long t…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 06:51 PM
0

You do realize we're not children here, right? Have you ever even met a college student?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:16 AM
3

Friedan refused to discuss her camp analogy in any detail, repeating several times that she had made an error in judgment." She did make an error in judgment. She honestly let the rest of us know how she felt. And now she can't get away from it.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:50 AM
0

If I give you a napkin, I'm not asking you to make a mess. If you give college students a way to harass people with no repercussions whatsoever, you are asking them to do it.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:44 AM
-1

That will lead to no legal prosecution, that tolerates no false accusations, It's anonymous. What are you going to do, put up a post asking people to not abuse it? I'm sure that's going to work so well.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:27 AM
-1

A totally anonymous "rape report" form.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:06 AM
8

Wait so you have guy's that rape women in public in India, that go unchecked and uncharged, yet this shit is allowed to happen? Ok. That's how corrupt, worthless governments work.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 03:32 PM
5

When faced with actual an actual brutal, repressive patriarchy that employs systematic violence against women, what do feminists do? Blame the guys criticizing it, of course!
/r/MensRights25/12/13 03:17 AM
-5

AFALT.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 08:59 PM
6

They have the right to sue for custody. That does not mean they have a chance of getting it.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 07:03 PM
2

They didn't claim occidental raped them, you clowns posted female staff members to accuse. The staff posted were those from the Dean of Students Office and the Critical Theory & Social Justice department. They were not exclusively female.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:59 PM
1

If you had a taser and pepper spray. What would you do? To use force one must have some reasonable fear of an imminent and severe threat. There's no way I'm going to be able to convince a jury that a strange attempt to hit on me merited 50,000 volts.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:45 PM
1

Basset hounds are rather prone to getting fat if they're not watched carefully.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 12:49 PM
9

So if you think this is adorable, you're an evil woman hater. Is she trying to be that stupid, or does it just come naturally for her?
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:35 PM
2

We’ve seen it in Apartheid, in U.S slavery, and we’re still seeing it with Syria. South Africa's as awful now as it ever was under apartheid, and the Syrian resistance is, as near as we can tell, no less deranged than Bashar Al-Assad himself. Lots of revolutionaries are as bad or worse than the system they oppose. The resistance against patriarchy is no different. You just compared slavery to ads with scantily clad women. That's incredibly racist and stupid. Social psychology 101 – in order for …
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:39 PM
3

How come instead of spamming the system with hundreds of false reports, effectively making light of what is supposed to be a serious goal here, hundreds of well thought out emails pointing out the flaws of the system weren't sent? The administrators at Occidental College won't listen to those emails. They will listen when they're the ones on the wrong end of false reports.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:38 AM
-1

He says while smack dab in the middle of a hate movement that keeps insisting it's also "social justice". Any evidence to back up your claim?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:57 PM
14

No one has ever explained why accurately naming this system is funny. Because it's so stupid that laughter is the immediate response. It's the same reason whining about "the international Marxist Jewish conspiracy" will elicit laughter. What Bell doesn't get is that she's not a strong, empowered, terrifying warrior womyn. She's a cowardly, stupid joke of a woman. She's like David Icke. We're not laughing because the international world running conspiracy brainwashed us, we're laughing because yo…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:38 PM
19

Oddly enough, one of the arguments made to support slavery really was that it was good for the slaves. Seriously. People actually said that with a straight face.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:35 PM
2

Treason's a federal crime.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:18 AM
1

Am I correct in assuming some states still have the death penalty for rape? (Scottish here) Nope. The only state crime that still carries the death penalty is murder, and in some states even that does not carry the death penalty.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:15 AM
2

I'm pretty sure double punishments are against your constitution. Double jeopardy holds that one can not be charged twice with the same crime. You can be charged with the crime then be independently taken to civil court over what you did.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:13 AM
6

Like Marc Lepine No MRA affiliation. Anders Breivik White nationalist, not MRA. Thomas Ball Only set himself on fire. George Sodini Again, not MRA.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:34 PM
3

Whatever you want to say about the reactions from various member of this sub, the form itself is authentic.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:38 AM
13

Patriarchy causes women to need to control and manipulate men, because they aen’t allowed to act in their own right but must proxy through a male figurehead. Which is why men never control or manipulate women or each other, right? Politicians aren't real? What you are seeing here is the legacy of centuries of men oppressing women. There are still women who believe, as they were traditionally taught, that their way to wealth, fame, or social status is by attaching themselves to the “right” man, a…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:38 PM
23

How about the fact that up until the 20th century, MEN had ALL the RIGHTS? I suppose if you ignore the Irish under Cromwell, the serfs under Feudalism, everyone under the Mongols, the Gauls under Caesar, the Native Americans under the Aztecs, the slaves under the plantation owners, and the English under the Normans this isn't a completely false statement.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:34 PM
0

Sweaty, muscular guys are attractive to women, more news at 11.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:21 PM
8

How? I linked to a public webpage with public information.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:29 PM
0

There isn't even real disciplinary action. Which only makes it less likely that a real victim will report it. Who's more likely to report someone if the report will only lead to the "assailant" being given a stern talking to? Someone who was actually raped (who will then have pissed off the person who attacked them, and invited retribution on themselves) or someone who has a penchant for cruel pranks?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 12:29 PM
11

So if a rape victim doesn't want to face the police for a variety of reasons... their rape wasn't real? If, for example, a young man is too embarrassed and traumatized that he was raped by a young woman to report it to the police, who he fears will belittle his experience, then too bad? It is never good to go down the road of secret trials and back alley justice.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 12:04 PM
5

Ah, yes, because the world is just teeming with false rape accusers, Give people the power to anonymously accuse other people, and it will be abused. Perhaps to get back at exes and strict professors, perhaps as someone's idea of a prank. But if you let people file totally anonymous accusations, someone will abuse that power.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:07 AM
9

Secret trials are, historically speaking, a very bad thing.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:05 AM
-1

The second they outlaw "revenge porn," you're going to see people who film cops up on sex crimes charges.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:45 AM
5

She took a photo of the two men and just posted it on twitter. She criticized them for making a sexist joke involving "dongles" and "forking repos". No evidence was necessary. The best part? Richards had previously made a dick joke on her Twitter feed. Among her other insane, idiotic acts, she turned out to be a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 01:51 AM
7

DongleGate was a facepalm moment for every single female engineer in the Silicon Valley that I know. The only "feminists" optimistic and supporting what happened are a handful in HR, business, etc... or outside IT entirely. Adria's a garden variety bully who got what she deserved.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 01:50 AM
10

Noam Chomsky (who I do not particularly like) put it this way. If you believe in freedom of speech, you believe in freedom of speech for views you don't like. Goebbels was in favor of freedom of speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you're in favor of freedom of speech, that means you're in favor of freedom of speech precisely for views you despise. And I find I agree with him there.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 01:48 AM
2

Think of it this way: is rape common because law enforcement is minimal; or is law enforcement minimal because, culturally, rape is common? Law enforcement is minimal because the governments in those countries suck. NAMBLA is a marginalized & disorganized group desperately attempting to justify their immoral tendencies. NAMBLA is a couple of undercover FBI agents waiting to bust pedophiles at this point. Groups like MR are composed of people who, deep down, hate women but want to be taken seriou…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:24 PM
1

Yes, of course it was. Do you even know who the Aztecs were? No. Of course not. No race/culture has come close to the amount of evil white people have created on earth throughout history. The Asians have us beat there. Mexico=little diversity, little acceptance, little love, hatred, violence and misery. Japan is pretty much the most monoethnic, monocultural state on the planet. Yet their violent crime rate is one of the lowest. Explain that. Where do you get that I have no proof? Your failure to…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:22 PM
2

In the middle east & africa gang rape is common and rapists are open about it. There's no effective law enforcement in those nations. Just as men's rights supporters get together and justify their hate, pedophiles or rapists can get together (NAMBLA for example) and find ways to justify their actions. At this point NAMBLA appears to have about 10 members, and probably 8 of them are undercover cops. You really need a better example. In all of your cases rape is not culturally accepted so your par…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 03:44 PM
1

This leads to rape and fetishization in some cases, Rape is an antisocial act, not a social one.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 03:15 PM
5

How tf are we imprisoned..? We control the world of business, government. Barack Obama doesn't consult me before he orders drone strikes. Does he consult you?
/r/MensRights15/12/13 01:18 AM
4

(that is if you manage to differentiate the beliefs of this group from those of radical anti-feminist leaders in the 3rd world like African and Middle Eastern religious leaders) Anti-feminism in the middle east and Africa is the result of radical Islam, as you yourself pointed out. You won't find many lunatics blaming the Jews for shark attacks here on r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 01:17 AM
1

Yo... I love humankind. You don't even know how much I love it! I love the culture, the diversity, the art and passion and hope and community. The Aztec "culture" was a good thing? I am totally in agreement with "you get what you give"... Then you understand why we dislike feminists? Guess what, white people were pretty fucked up in the past, So were all the other races. What's the point? That people have been wicked to each other throughout the human race? Let go of what your church/family tell…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 01:15 AM
3

Men's use of violence against women is learned and reinforced through many social, cultural and institutional experiences. But it's not. Violence against your fellow citizens is frowned on in the US. That's another lie to back up the first one when the first one was revealed.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 07:58 AM
4

If you buy into the framing of domestic violence as patriarchal, the existence of men battered by their wives becomes questionable. The existence of battered husbands disproves the feminist framing.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 06:46 AM
6

Given that about 90% of cases in the US are settled by plea bargain and about that percent of prisoners are male, it wouldn't be possible for only women to be getting offered plea bargains.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:14 PM
57

This sounds like an MR issue, but may not be. Over 90% of US cases are settled by plea bargain. Odds are good that a guy who whacked his wife would have gotten the same deal.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 11:03 AM
4

Stalin let millions starve to death and called it Socialism. More accurately, he caused it to happen. The Holodomor was no accident.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 09:40 AM
2

That kid doesn't even know what sex is. What he did is a greeting in much of the world. Accusing him of "sexual harassment" or rape is inconceivably stupid. And yet feminists do it.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:23 AM
31

Feminists: What abuse? Stop whining! Women suffer abuse! Look THIS is real abuse - THAT, that is not abuse. Not to mention accusing him of being the abuser.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:20 AM
6

They have the sign that people don't get killed.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:17 AM
13

It's a rewording of the old argument that we blame feminists/women/minorities for the existence of sexism/bigotry against men. The problem with that argument is that a fair amount of discrimination against men is called by feminists. Especially relating to domestic violence and custody arrangements. Saying "MRAs blame feminism for lots of sexism" is like saying "the cops blame gangs for lots of crime." The blame is being fairly assigned.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 12:35 AM
0

You know that line in your Miranda rights about "anything you say can and will be used against you?" That's why you always invoke your fifth amendment rights.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:23 AM
5

So, who would classify sites as "pornographic" or acceptable?
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:15 AM
10

This alliance actually goes back a long way. Dworkin the Hutt testified before the Meese Commission under Reagan in order to make the case that porn actually caused rape. Far right and far left groups have been working together for a long time.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:11 AM
0

The Taliban did crack down on it. But after we kicked them out, the pedophilic practices came back.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:24 AM
18

The police chiefs we put up to fight the Taliban rape little boys. Our government just doesn't care.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 11:42 PM
7

And if she does attack someone, if she attacks you. You send her loony ass to jail. If she attacks someone, there's a good chance that she goes home in a body bag. These people may not care about ethics, but the concept of getting stabbed to death might slow them down.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 07:04 AM
5

John Money never apologized for what he did David Reimer. Amanda Marcotte never apologized for what she said about the Duke Lacrosse team. These people don't do guilt or remorse.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:12 PM
2

The problem with that is assuming that 'real' feminists actually see the radical messages. There's alot of people in this subreddit who actively look for outrageously radical crap to post here to be like "See?? This is why feminists suck!" That's usually the first I hear about anything crazy femRADS are doing. John Money didn't act in secret. Nor did Dworkin or Solanas. Feminists knew about them and praised them.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:57 PM
4

Women can do things to fix this - stop writing online, get into gun culture, dox and file lawsuits - but the most efficient way to stop this is to stop this, and men as a group can police each other more. Not really. Violent men don't listen to the ones who are nonviolent. It's why the cops go around armed to the teeth.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:37 PM
3

Somehow men are learning that it’s ok to rape, beat, and even kill women, simply because they are women. They are learning this from men Actually, they're not. It's called anti-social personality disorder for a reason. These people just don't care about the rules. That's why they commit violence against women in spite of how much our society hates violence against women.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:35 PM
46

That's why you report it to the MPs. Army CID exists for a reason. Reporting your superior to himself is just stupid.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:13 PM
2

People are willing to confess to crimes they didn't commit for attention, and we're supposed to believe they won't falsely accuse others? Get real.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:50 PM
1

Stupidity is not misogyny.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:47 PM
2

For centuries, your kind told women to shut up and stay in the kitchen. No they didn't. The "stay in the kitchen" period of human history was a brief, western, middle class affair. In preindustrial society, men and women both work. It's the only way to produce enough food for everyone. It's only with the industrial revolution and the rise of a sort of middle class that some substantial number of men become rich enough to give their wives the luxury of staying at home and not working. Then it bec…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 09:34 AM
1

After all feminists have done only misogynists like you oppose them What evidence do you have to suggest that I hate women? because only YOU believe it was a worthless movement. I think Sarky's a worthless coward and that Dworkin was a stupid whale. I make no secret of those beliefs.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 09:12 AM
4

If they really want to go there, can we just kick them out? I miss the medieval concept of outlawry right now. It would be a nice way to deal with these people.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:28 AM
2

Her explanation included how it all started with how a bunch of people who were labeled feminist were shot. This is a reference to the mass shooting committed by Mark Lepine. Most murder victims are actually male, but because of this one guy who targeted women we're all supposed to cry about how hard it is to be female.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 07:21 PM
6

I find it highly unlikely that even the Congo's high violence rate is enough to push the global average up to 1 in 3. That's just absurd. It's not. The DRC's not that big. Even if every woman there had been raped, it wouldn't change much on a global scale.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:58 AM
8

1 in 3 is more of a global estimate. This includes Congo. There's only about 66 million people in the DRC. That's about 1% of the world's population. That alone could not throw the stats off that far.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:57 AM
12

Negative on rape, even if you include prison rape. Do you know how many women are raped everyday in Congo? You're assuming that the groups in the Congo raping women don't rape men. They do. And part of that problem is the objectification of women. If that were true then the Middle East, where porn is frowned upon and women are made to cover up, would be a peaceful utopia. Oh wait, it's not. Because pictures of boobs don't turn guys into deranged psychopaths. I wouldn't be surprised. It's her job…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:54 AM
1

truth isn't an absolute defense in any case It is in the US. It appears that it may be in Canada as well.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:02 AM
6

Most of them are either racists or black women. The two are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 05:35 AM
8

"Miscegenation is evil!" -Feminists and the KKK.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:59 AM
11

The feminist who proposed the basis for the Tender Years Doctrine did so through passionate campaigning because in her time a divorce meant that children went straight into custody of their father, and she was denied any contact with her children after she divorced her husband for adultery - custody was already lopsided, she didn't make it so. No, but she set up discrimination against men. Her solution was not a good one.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 09:09 PM
2

And being accused of defamation does not make one guilty of defamation. Yes, and what is your point?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:53 PM
0

I'm not saying that I think automatic immunity from defamation laws is a good idea, however: sometimes I think this sub forgets that there are real, actual sexual predators who might use this tool to intimidate and silence victims. Defamation, by definition, is false.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:46 PM
3

The case has set a dangerous precedent, sending a message to survivors of sexual assault to stay silent, says the Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres (OCRCC). For it to be libel, it must be false. If it's true, it's not defamation. This has absolutely no effect on "survivors" of sexual assault. It only applies to liars.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:39 PM
12

Feminism doesn't discuss men's issues as something that they'll "eventually sort out" - it discusses men's issues as gender inequalities that, through the application of feminist ideals, will also be eliminated. The problem is that a fair number of men's issues are the result of feminist ideals. The Tender Years doctrine and the Duluth model of domestic violence, for instance.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 04:47 PM
25

It means "sit down, shut up, and stop asking inconvenient questions." They're proven that they don't actually care about men. They just pretend to when asked about it.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 04:46 PM
5

Just remember kids, not all feminists are like that. The feminists who are like that say so, so it must be true.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:51 PM
5

"Men can be dragged kicking and screaming into that inevitable future, or we can accept it and ask what it means for us." Or we can drag Michael Kimmel kicking and screaming to the shark tank. Actually, let's just do that. The gene pool needs chlorination. Angry white men are everywhere geographically! I look at some groups, like the extreme right wing, who might tend to be more small-town, exurban. Many are suburban, from those sprawling suburbs that extend far into what used to be "rural Ameri…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:50 PM
3

When I think "white rage" I think Vikings and fire, not guys with protest signs. But that's just my logic privilege talking.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:39 PM
3

I think "poor black girl raped by rich white boys" fits the media agenda. Which is why Nifong was so intent on prosecuting the Lacrosse players. He wanted to secure the black vote for the next election.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:04 AM
-2

This is objectively true and scientifically proven. Not exactly. Some women are affected by hybristophilia, but most aren't.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 04:19 AM
4

Consult a lawyer before taking any action that could lead to legal issues, but the exclusionary rule is designed to keep the cops from just barging in without a warrant. Before they implemented it, the cops would just illegally search places and deal with the lawsuits or complaints later. The exclusionary rule is there to give some teeth to the fourth amendment.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 12:39 AM
15

Illegally obtained evidence is only inadmissible if it was obtained by a police officer or someone acting on behalf of the police. That's why people go to jail when burglars find their child porn.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 12:24 AM
3

None of what they're saying is all that offensive or radical if you flip the genders. Go to any major bookstore chain, like Barnes and Nobles. Check out the "Relationships" section. Over 90% of the books will be targetted towards women, and the vast majority will have demeaning labels and stereotypes of men. Saying "other people do it too" doesn't mean that it's not bad for you to do it. The fact that the idiots peddling dating advice to females suck doesn't mean that the idiots peddling dating …
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:29 AM
7

As Wiseman notes, a working paper this summer from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that from the 1980s to the 2000s, the mode (that is, statistically, the value that appeared most often) of girls’ high school GPA distribution shifted from B to A, essentially leaving boys behind, as the mode of boys’ GPA distribution stayed at B. College enrollment has followed the same pattern. Whereas 58% of college students in 1970 were men, by 2010, 57% of college students were women, according…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 07:02 PM
1

I think it's a rather useful app. Any subhuman who uses it is one you didn't want to date anyways.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 02:29 PM
7

Mostly, they blame women: ex-wives, would-be girlfriends, the phantom black women who stole their jobs. The editor of a men’s rights website proclaims, “The real question here is not whether these women deserve the business end of a right hook, they obviously do, and some of them deserve one hard enough to leave them in an unconscious, innocuous pile on the ground.” That article was written in reference to women who beat their male partners because female privilege allows them to do so without b…
/r/MensRights23/11/13 04:07 PM
18

including 72% of the Women's Studies department But women's studies is a real major, because feminists say so.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 06:21 AM
25

Narcissistic rage. You show a narcissist his flaws, he gets mad. You show a feminist why people don't fall down and worship at their feet, it's in their mentally deficient nature to lash out.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 11:57 PM
9

Anyway, men have started a campaign for some long-overdue recognition. It’s called International Men’s Day and it happens every November 19. Now, I know there may be some among the sisterhood who’d complain they’ve already got the other 364 days a year. And they’d have a point. If only I cared what you and your "sisterhood" thought. But we don’t have a perfect world, as all the above has shown. And we must start somewhere. Hopefully "somewhere" involves the author of this article and a hungry sh…
/r/MensRights19/11/13 08:23 PM
10

Blokes already dominate the other 364 days of the year - but women SHOULD support International Men's Day One sentence in, and the stupid is already coming. Because it just might prompt men to speak out on subjects like sex trafficking, slut-shaming, domestic abuse, and religious persecution Oh hey, there's the stupid. I'm not going to make a habit of pissing off human traffickers, wife beaters, or radical Muslims just because some feminist who couldn't get laid on a submarine asked me to (and n…
/r/MensRights19/11/13 08:05 PM
15

Oh look, a totally unenforceable law being passed by the government in order to get people to think that they're doing something useful.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 03:57 PM
1

This is an explanation why quite a few women seem to hate or at least despise men. Notice how these women tend to look like, well, Andrea Dworkin. The simplest explanation may be the best here.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 05:27 PM
1

No no no, you have to understand, Robin Thicke's music will destroy the nation. Ignore the fact that when we had this moral panic over jazz, rock and roll, heavy metal, and hip hop the country didn't fall. This is the music that will trash western civilization!
/r/MensRights17/11/13 08:31 AM
5

I'm pretty sure this is used for people with strange fetishes.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 07:33 PM
1

...It is icky and the direct result of lowered expectations of women. If we refused to allow this kind of objectification, men would put it back into the mens' rooms where it belongs. Instead, our women try to emulate a porn identity. As a society, we have allowed ourselves to devalue our sexuality and lowered ourselves to the level of animals with no discernment or free will. Feminists really do hate women. They actually think women are so weak that they simply can't say no.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 07:27 PM
4

The fact that the young man can write an articulate, calm, and structured response in the face of a vendetta for an imagined crime is nothing short of astounding. That's what separates the strong from weaklings who bully others.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 09:03 PM
0

Deport her to a country where women actually don't have any rights. Or a men's prison.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 06:57 PM
1

If the gender roles were reversed, the 21yo male would be sentenced to life in prison with no chance for parol and forever placed on a sexual predator list. The age of consent is 16 in North Ireland. She can't legally be charged with statutory rape, because what she did wasn't statutory rape under the laws of North Ireland. She is being charged with the relevant crime to what she did.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:17 PM
2

While the father is not 'wholly' incapable, his option of "something else or nothing", and then following through on the "nothing" is just bad form, especially for a dad. One of the worst things you can do while parenting is make a threat and not follow through on it.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 08:34 AM
7

In 1991 and 1991, he denied that the Armenian genocide had happened.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:43 PM
-1

I really dislike TYT. They're so knee deep in their ideology. They have no hesitation in using fallacious arguments and ignorance to further their agenda. They should be taken no more seriously than a group calling themselves the National Socialists whose leader denied the Holocaust.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:12 PM
4

You can't expect much from a group named after a band of genocidal thugs whose leader denies the Armenian genocide.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:11 PM
1

Yes, to file a lawsuit you'd need to name a "defendant"...then in court, you'd need to show the defendant committed libel. That last part's actually pretty easy. According to the statistics used by feminists, about 6% of guys are rapists. Meaning that there's a 94% chance the guy who they said was a rapists wasn't. That's proof of defamation right there.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:59 AM
17

You may be under the impression that I hate men. This is not the case. Men are fine! (Some men are really fine, if you get what I'm saying, which I'm sure you do, because that had all the subtlety of a large-scale trainwreck.) "Some of my best friends are black, therefore I'm not racist!" Feminism is a movement that is largely based on female lived experiences. Which is why it's bullshit. I want you to think about all the women who are denied a chance to speak by men around the world -- women wh…
/r/MensRights07/11/13 11:22 AM
2

Every violent criminal has a sob story. If you believe him or her, you're an idiot. These people will play you.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 11:19 AM
7

Yes it will. In some jurisdictions the law does in fact hold that women are not capable of committing rape.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:19 PM
1

A single person can have multiple targets before that individual is arrested. Or he can get arrested, get out, and do it again. If you didn't use a gun and plead guilty, you'll be out relatively quickly for most crimes.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:24 AM
3

Just tell the psychopaths "hey, please stop being crazy" and they'll stop! After all, when the state of Florida nicely asked Ted Bundy to quit killing people, he did! We don't need courts, prisons, or police forces. All we need are gender studies majors to whine about how mean people are! Because that will convince someone who is willing to commit a felony to stop!
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:23 AM
7

felt total sympathy for this dude until I learned he was a juggalo. The fact that his taste in music sucks doesn't justify defaming his character.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:21 AM
11

A tipping point will be reached where more and more men will be so suspicious of claims like this that they won't believe even the true ones. Unless there's evidence given to support it.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:20 AM
3

A lot of people are very upset by it, but I think if a man was secure he wasn’t a rapist, he wouldn’t be threatened by this list.” I think that "potential rapist" list might actually be defamation. Rapists exhibit a particular psychological condition that most men do not. Any of the students who got cleared by a psychologist as not being antisocial could maybe have this bitch paying for what she said.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 04:12 AM
1

It scares me, actually. I was tempted to go full-schoolyard on him. I wanted to find his address, fly to his town, and deliver a Priority Plus Beatdown right to his door (free shipping and handling). This is the kind of stupidity that gets young men killed.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:52 AM
28

what did she even think was going to happen. after she kicked him, she learned that he will fight back and then she attacks him again. If he was actually violent, she'd be dead or in the hospital.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:08 AM
2

No she didn't. Yes she did. As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. Quoting that with the middle cut out in order to make it seem like she thinks all men are rapists is pretty dishonest, wouldn't you say? Not really. She just said most men were. She didn't say all men were.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:37 PM
8

For a public figure to seek defamation damages in court, they must prove that the statement was made with the knowledge that it was false or with total disregard for the veracity of said statements. Meaning that no radfem stands a chance of actually getting defamation damages based on misquotes. The stuff they've actually said is so deranged that a reasonable person would not have too much trouble believing the fake quotes were real. Take Marilyn French. She actually did say this. As long as som…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 08:54 AM
22

But remember, feminism helps men, honest.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 08:51 AM
1

Do you not see at as hypocritical that you are defending victim blaming while complaining that the things feminists say are extreme? Taunting violent people can result in them behaving violently towards you. Not all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 04:04 AM
1

"Women are begging to be raped" is not "abrasive" either. Can people not invite violence against themselves? If I go into a bar full of Hells Angels and call them leather clad faggots, did I not do just that?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 07:29 PM
5

How many little kids has Susan Smith killed recently? Oh wait, zero. I wonder why that is.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 07:15 PM
3

True. But a man who committed a similar crime would most likely get life imprisonment. She basically did. They don't ever have to let you out of the loony bin. It's like Charles Manson being "eligible" for parole. Sure he can go in front of the board, but they're never letting him out.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 05:25 AM
3

When feminists are abrasive "All men are rapists" is not "abrasive" statement. It's a bigoted, idiotic, and false statement.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 05:10 AM
1

Google glass can't come soon enough. Most phones these days have a recording option.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 03:33 AM
4

How did women bring about prohibition? I would like to see sources on that. Look up Carrie Nation (an early temperance crusader and feminist), who actually used violence in her crusade to control men's lives. She'd smash up stuff in saloons using a hatchet. But remember kids, women aren't violent or power hungry. Ever.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:21 AM
17

Feminists don't do history. They do "herstory." The fact that they tried to rewrite history without even realizing that "history" comes from "historia" (Latin) which is itself from a Greek word meaning "inquiry" tells you all you need to know about their nonexistent intellectual prowess.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:19 AM
6

Feminists have ensured that, through the Violence Against Women Act that MRAs oppose, the overall rate of intimate partner violence in the U.S. declined 64 percent between 1994 and 2010 Crime in general dropped like a rock since 1993. VAWA had nothing to do with that. You are making crap up to support a worthless law that demonizes an entire sex. and that decline is distributed evenly between male and female victims. The male victims feminists are still pretending don't exist. It’s hard to know …
/r/MensRights24/10/13 11:24 PM
6

I’ve got a tiny taste of this last month. When word spread that I was going to be featured on 20/20, A Voice For Men published a hit piece, calling me a bad feminist (for criticizing Naomi Wolf), accusing me of demonizing male sexuality, and simultaneously suggesting that my bisexuality means I haven’t slept with enough men to have valid opinions about them, that I’m too fat and ugly to get a man to sleep with me, and that I’m a miserable slut who needs to manipulate other women into validating …
/r/MensRights24/10/13 11:23 PM
10

While Pick Up Artists are perfectly plain that all they care about is using women for sex, MRAs claim to be a movement for positive change, with the stated aim of getting men recognized as an oppressed class—and women, especially but not exclusively feminists, as men’s oppressors. Which MRAs have declared women to be an evil class of people? I've seen some say that female privilege exists, but I thought being privileged wasn't a bad thing? After all, that's what you all say when you're defending…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 11:23 PM
10

This is a big article. Doesn't mean it can't be tackled. THE EMPEROR PROTECTS! Only once the production crew taped the microphone on my dress did I have second thoughts. As part of an upcoming 20/20 special, I’d agreed to a sit-down with Paul Elam. Elam is founder and publisher of A Voice For Men (AVFM), one of the main hubs for the burgeoning “men’s rights’ movement.” In a blog post on the organization’s site, he made his feelings clear: “I find you, as a feminist, to be a loathsome, vile piece…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 11:22 PM
12

Nolan first learned of the alleged sexual assault on a sidewalk during Ohio University’s homecoming when he saw a video of it on 4Chan. Users on 4Chan were outraged over the footage that was uploaded to viral video site World Star Hip Hop Uncut. It showed over a minute of an extended recording of the alleged rape. Users were furious that it didn’t look like the sexual assault Ohio law enforcement was reporting it as. Probably because she pushed his head into her groin while she was going down on…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 07:59 PM
1

Serious studies on the subject - and by that I mean studies conducted by genuine researchers in behavioral science with relevant qualifications who have no bias and are not seeking a particular outcome - show that overwhelmingly, rapists are sociopathic predators who rape many times and display narcissistic behaviours centering on lack of empathy and moral structure. They are rather literally brain damaged.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 07:39 PM
6

Somehow I can't even imagine that working, I mean what would the police have done when they broke in the door and found a quite children's party? All shouted "HE DID IT!" while pointing at another officer.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 08:17 PM
1

Keep in mind you need means, motive, and method for a murder charge. Nope. You need mens rea and actus reus.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 12:51 AM
5

This is a hilariously common delusion among feminists. The idea that women are on average physically weaker then men because of "patriarchy". And that if only we lived in a perfectly feminist utopic (read: sexless) society, all sexual dimorphic traits would vanish and women would be competing in the exact same powerlifting classes as men. No...seriously, that's what they actually think. Y chromosomes don't real, apparently. The fact that animals without societies exhibit sexual dimorphism eviden…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:50 PM
5

Would you like your daughter to be on the front page of Zoo or Nuts or Loaded? I'd really hate for my daughter to be a lying self righteous bitch like Harriet Harman. Remember the lies you told about rape convictions? Because the internet does. Looks like you've got a new way to spread misandry. Maybe this time the Baroness Stern won't spank you like the naughty girl you are.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:50 PM
3

I'm saying pornography depicts those things as being desirable or pleasurable for men. Then why hasn't someone made porn that men would actually like and wiped the other producers out of the market?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:25 AM
4

Females are depicted as objects available to satisfy male desires. So, gay porn. Explain that to me.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:20 AM
3

Uh, no, her logic requires no such thing. He argument is that the porn industry as it currently exists is extremely misogynistic. Which is bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:17 AM
8

Does she really deserve anything else?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:15 AM
4

Privilege blindness, victim mentality, and a serious tendency towards mansplaining. The fact that they used the term "mansplaining" proves that they're idiots. The truth is true even when spoken by someone that you don't like. But let's not fall into their vice, and try to take the rest of their points seriously. Gross generalizations of all women, often extrapolated from one or a few encounters with particular women in their life. Where on this subreddit do we see this? Reliance on outdated vie…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 06:50 AM
3

holding him accountable for his own actions is insanity you say? how else is he supposed to learn? Someone got a picture of it on their phone. That's punishment enough, really.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:47 PM
5

public nudity is a sex offence Then we need to have a serious discussion over the legal definition of sex offenses.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:46 PM
18

These are the same chimps who read Marcotte's blog. Don't be surprised.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:32 PM
5

Social skills I realize a lot of you read “pick-up” manuals and blogs and think that you’ve developed social skills, but most of the time, the answer is no. The “pick-up” community is based on a single, false premise: That women are non-human animals that have to be understood as a separate species. Not really. It just assumes that women find some traits more attractive, and that men who pick up those traits will be seen as more attractive by women. It’s closer to the philosophy of dog training …
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:24 PM
9

I realize that part of the reason is that I, because of my desire not to ‘splain things that I think you already know, have never articulated what kind of self-improvement project that misogynists could take on instead of trolling feminists online. But their rising levels of hate and frustration have made it clear that they may just not know! Self improvement doesn't get stupid feminists to write articles whining about how mean you are. So, in interests of making life more pleasant for everyone …
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:24 PM
9

Our recent troll infestation—which was conducted, as many are, by trolls who wait until a Friday night because they know that the moderators, unlike themselves, are probably offline socializing and maybe even having sex—was an unpleasant reminder that a lot of the angry, entitled dudes described in the post blame feminism because they can’t get all the sex they think they deserve. You're assuming that trolls actually believe what they're saying. They don't. They just know it will piss you off. Y…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:23 PM
4

The hoax is the first result you get if you google her name. She has destroyed her own career before it even began.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:40 PM
3

I never read Dworkin. What did she say exactly? That men are death worshiping rapists. I'm bothered by real world violence in a very different way than concerning messages found in mass media. The emotions are very different. Both should be addressed in their own way. We already have a way for you to address mass media you dislike. Don't use it.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:40 PM
1

Sorry, I didn't mean to make anyone angry. Did I say I was angry? I never said that. Dworkin did. A lot of things bother me in different ways. I don't have to pick and choose what bothers me the most--I can address all or none. How do you justify being less concerned by dead bodies than you are by a video game?
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:00 PM
1

Let's leave Hitler out of this one. I don't like to talk about that. Needless to say, Hitler was an invader--a colonizer if you will. Nonsense, he was just taking the land the Germans were entitled to. Should we have really gotten involved? I mean we Americans aren't really qualified to judge the Europeans, right? If we can't judge the Afghan habit of raping little boys for fun and killing little girls for trying to read, why judge the Europeans? No, it's not. Feminism has a long and impressive …
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:48 PM
0

Well, it's not my place to run into other people's countries and cultures and tell them how to act or behave. That's a very colonialist attitude. So we should have let Hitler do his thing? Regardless, feminism isn't a game, No, it's a joke. and the goal isn't to "win." What's the goal? To get people to hate you all even more? To make people realize how idiotic you are? Because when you bitch about a video game, that's what you're doing. Women are being subject to atrocities, but the people who c…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:29 PM
4

I doubt the guys playing GTA 5 read Marcotte's writing.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:26 PM
6

No, we're not. At least, I don't think so. Well, I don't think the commercial success of a popular video game franchise has much to do with success or failure of feminism anyway. You're the ones who made it about imaginary misogyny in video games rather than the women being oppressed in the Middle East. It's not our fault that you chose a battle you couldn't win. You decided to bitch about something that wasn't worth bitching about, and people aren't listening to you.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:21 PM
24

Because men don't want to be associated with being sexist, so many men will become parrots to these feminists. GTA V has already raked in over $1 billion for Rockstar. The feminists are losing.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:52 AM
24

GTA 5 has already sold over 15 million copies. Feminists can pitch bitch fits, but people aren't listening to them anymore. They've scream "RAPE" and "MISOGYNY" so much that those words have lost all meaning and they have lost all credibility. They can say that they hate the game industry, but the game industry doesn't need them. The kind of guy who buys video games is not the kind of guy who cares about what Amanda Marcotte thinks.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:51 AM
100

When you teach little girls that they're special snowflakes who can do no wrong, you're setting them up to have their self esteem crushed when they run into people who are smarter than them.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 04:46 PM
2

Just remember, not all feminists are like that. We know this because the ones that are like that keep telling us this.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 02:30 PM
2

Ugh. The SO is also half black so I tried using the analogy of all black people are crooks. Ideologies are defined by beliefs. Arguing "feminism is sexist" can not be a racist statement. It may be incorrect, but it can't be racist or sexist. Comparing this belief to actual racism is idiotic.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:20 AM
0

He spends a significant amount of time in this article dismissing and belittling a huge section of the LGBT movement. He constructs the "good queer," someone who rejects feminism and LGBT activism. He's not exactly nice to straight feminists. Thanks Elam, thanks for appropriating all the thing gay men have done for men. Because apparently you can't "develop of civilization" *because you're gay." Can you do it because you're straight? If not, then why say you can do it because you're day?
/r/MensRights30/09/13 11:35 AM
7

What the hell was that film... "Nobody cares about Africa." That quote is quite correct. I think the first thing I noticed in the coverage of the Nairobi attacks was that Western media was, predictably, rather focused on the American and white victims. That's probably what al-Shabab went after that mall. High class clientele, better press coverage.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:27 AM
4

Porn is under attack as never before. David Cameron says he will force internet providers to filter it out, while women's groups and campaigners against child abuse are arguing that it has a disastrous effect on young people's ideas about sex. Totally false. Don't get me wrong, David Cameron hasn't done this crap before. But back in the 70s sexually frustrated idiotic whales like Dworkin were bitching about how awful porn was because as long as men had their hands and Playboy she couldn't get la…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 03:27 AM
4

It is so much easier to put the onus on girls, to blame them for how they dress and how they act It's called personal responsibility. If you send pictures of yourself naked to someone, that's on you. You made the decision.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 04:15 PM
2

Oh goodness, this (r/mensrights) reminds me the kinds of people who go whining about how "anti-white" racism is also a huge problem in Western societies Because the British mistreatment of the Irish, and everyone in Europe's mistreatment of the Jews and the Slavs simply doesn't real.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:32 AM
-1

The thing is, I get it - men are also rape victims and getting custody of their children shouldn't be such an uphill battle. I don't believe these things just because they are facts and I have empathy. As a feminist, these men's rights problems also relate to society's warped notions about women: that they can't be aggressors, that they are always better at childcare than men, etc. Here's the thing: feminists are responsible for the biased family courts. They're the ones who lobbied to have them…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:22 AM
2

Humanities attendance is down in colleges, so gender studies majors are going to become more scarce.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:43 AM
1

For those curious, the pro-life movement is not simply old white men. Young people and ethnic minorities are actually more likely to be pro-life than older people and whites. As for the sexes, women and men are about equally likely to oppose abortion. So when the pro-choice chimps scream "OLD WHITE MEN SHOULDN'T TALK ABOUT ABORTION!" what they're really saying is "OVERTURN ROE NOW!" Of course, they're not actually smart enough to understand this.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:42 AM
8

It's well understood most of the physical altercations were instigated by police roughly trying to break the barricades. Illegally forcing people to stay out of a building has a tendency to bring police response. The best way to avoid this is to not illegally force people to stay out of buildings. If you can't understand that, maybe you need a good thrashing from the cops.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 12:57 AM
10

Teachers don't hug kids anymore. Some people would argue that this is a loss for the kids. Are you really too stupid to get that?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 12:53 AM
11

There's no nuance required here. And for that matter, pointing out all of the frankly awful positions held by Warren Farrell isn't disingenuous. What if some of the attendants were young fathers? What if they were closet pedophiles? What if after hearing him speak, they looked into his former work? What if his endorsement of child sexual assault was the justification they were looking for? To quote the Spartans, "if."
/r/MensRights27/09/13 12:52 AM
2

Regardless of whether these attacks are truthful or false, they have the same outcome. People who identify as feminists (but are more moderate, and actually agree with you) feel personally targeted. Oh well. Only around 20% of Americans identify as feminists. We need the "good" feminists like a fish needs a bicycle.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:13 PM
3

Tactless, too, is the practice of “outing” and shaming prominent feminists on the website for A Voice for Men, which is, frankly, more damaging to its own brand than others Does anyone really think Vanja Krajina will have good employment prospects now? No? Exactly.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:08 PM
18

It appears that the worst thing you can do to a feminist really is to remember what she said after she said it.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:06 PM
9

If Hitler had been a woman we might not have been able to bring her to justice. We didn't, he killed himself. You just know that Hitler wouldn't have managed it down in that bunker, but only "attempted" it. And then in the international criminal court "International criminal court" is the best euphemism for "Russian firing squad" I've heard in a long time.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:06 PM
12

Rape is worst than death That's something you can easily believe only if you're so privileged you don't have to worry about violent death.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:27 PM
2

I don't actually think you're understanding rape culture. Which doesn't actually exist. And I think this is the source of the disagreement between you can /u/iupvoteoutofpity. You believe that rape requires "forced" which is left (perhaps intentionally) ambiguous. But whatever you mean by rape, it seems like you believe that "'pressuring' her for sex" doesn't constitute rape Because it doesn't. If someone asks you to do something you don't want to do, the solution is to say "no." It's not to say…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:41 AM
3

It points out a concrete problem that is motivated by sex, I.e. rape, and suggest that there are men who do not do enough to prevent it. Yes there are. They're called rapists, and they engage in rape. And as a result our society tosses them in jail, because we here in Freedomland frown upon rape. They have had voting rights, property rights, personhood before the law, a lack of sexual violence perpetrated by the opposite sex, etc. for much of civilization. This is a complete lie. The idea that a…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:34 AM
3

Would you think it cool for me to do nothing? I doubt it. You could just get out of there and call the cops, which is a lot safer than trying to go rounds with violent people. How about if I refuse to testify at a future trial? Then they will subpoena your ass and you will testify. Or what if I and the rapists regularly tell jokes involving sodomizing men we don't like? Given that they have a habit of doing violent things, I would suggest you stay away from them.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 01:43 AM
2

Just because you do not do sexist things doesn't mean that sexism is not a massive and substantive problem. Why is it the job of all males to deal with violent criminals? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that why we have the cops?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 01:40 AM
3

I recall the last time this was posted a quote by her about how she mulled over wanting to kill some random white guy because there was a ticket/seat mix up on a flight she was on and her friend was forced to sit in a seating class below what she thought she had. That was Bell Hooks.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 05:21 PM
210

The story of the summer? The heartbreaking tragedy of Rehtaeh Parsons, a Nova Scotia teenager who took her own life after pictures reportedly showing her being sexually violated were circulated. The military also took over Egypt. But let's ignore that. Too many brown people involved. The song of the summer? “Blurred Lines,” with lyrics featuring coercive language recognizable to anyone who’s faced unwanted sexual advances. Ah yes, those kids and their music are going to destroy society. Because …
/r/MensRights22/09/13 03:10 PM
0

Real gender war looks like Cidad Juarez. It would be interesting to see how long Tumblr's SJW crowd would last against the cartels. I'm thinking about 10 seconds.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 06:39 AM
7

This from the rape apologist. Who really cares what she thinks?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:44 PM
3

Homosexuals since the late 1800's, have been trying to kill Christianity. To really get to the root of it all, you have to look up the old German militant homosexual groups circa 1870's+(the groups that where in a very real sense the precursors of the hyper masculine, butch homosexual Nazi's). The Nazis weren't exactly nice to homosexuals.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:24 PM
10

Please note that the ritual for real Masai warriors involves killing a lion with a spear and a shield. The best part? They now have begun phasing that ritual out. Not out of concern for the warriors, but because they are running out of lions.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:25 PM
10

Remember, not all feminists are like that. They keep telling us this right before they prove that they are like that.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:35 AM
5

Indeed. For all the ancient civilized world's fear of the barbarians, they never once stopped to think if the barbarians acted that way for a reason. Instead, they murdered their babies and enslaved their women, all the while making up stories about the rapists and cannibals that lurk up in Gaul, and how they have to murder those babies, lest they grow up to rape civilized women and eat civilized young. Take Alaric and his Visigoths. We all know that in 410, they looted Rome. What most people do…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:33 PM
1

Why would you lie about such a heinous crime only to reveal the lie within the next sunrise. Because you're crazy.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:01 PM
1

A better study (more recent, larger sample size) from 2005 estimated that the true number of malicious false allegations is actually probably around 3% of all allegations.. A false allegation need not be malicious.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:19 AM
1

About 20% of those rapes, if we're being generous, were reported to the police. RAINN says it's closer to 50%. About 8% of rape accusations are unfounded. This, again, is being generous, because "unfounded" does not necessarily mean that no rape occurred. But 8% works in your favor, so we'll use that. So you admit it could be much higher than 8% false. You are 4-5 times more likely to die from a gunshot wound than to be falsely accused of rape. True, but most gunshots are suicides. One can preve…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:18 AM
48

Poor mentally ill black dude gets screwed by the system. And the social justice warriors are nowhere in sight. Funny how that works.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:48 AM
27

Women never lie about rape. Obviously the patriarchy planted evidence to make this guy look innocent!
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:47 AM
1

I wonder how many there have convinced themselves that those kids really were guilty. Al Sharpton still refuses to apologize for the Tawana Brawley case.That was 25 years ago. These people will not apologize for the misery they've caused.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:43 AM
2

Easy. Hate crime added to assault on a police officer. If the thought of an assaulting an officer charge and the accompanying ass beating doesn't deter someone, he's probably not smart enough to understand what a hate crime is.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 09:14 PM
2

True, but we're not talking about murder. We're talking about the use of rape as a weapon in warfare. This is an accepted practice in a fair amount of the world.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 09:12 PM
2

Organized rape isn't considered a war crime in a fair amount of the world.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:06 AM
4

Don't advocate genocide if you want to be employed in the future. It's not that hard.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:07 AM
1

Let's look at this brand of idiocy, shall we? According to feminists, women make around 70% of the money men do. The average yearly wage in the US is about $43,000. So guys are going to make about 50,000 a year on average. Women will make about 37,000 a year on average. Meaning to equalize the "gap" we need to give every woman in the US $13,000 a year. There are over 150,000,000 women in the us. That means we'd have to add $1,950,000,000,000 trillion to the annual budget. Where are we going to c…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:39 PM
1

If you judge your self worth by how much bigger your bank account is than all of your friends', you're already worthless.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:01 AM
9

Women aren't able to hate men? I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them -Robin Morgan. The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each individual male in the patriarchy is aware of his relative power in the scheme of things.... He knows that his actions are supported by the twin pillars of the State of man - the brotherhood ritual of political exigency and the brotherhood ritua…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:39 AM
1

Or one about her being raped by a prison guard after getting tossed in jail for being a psycho.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 05:21 AM
4

Have you seen pictures of Dworkin? It's pretty obvious why these people hate male sexuality.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:04 AM
2

Defamation's not a crime. Perjury is.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 09:38 PM
44

Does the government restrict her from buying birth control, or does the government just not want to pay in this scenario? Last time I checked, the government doesn't pay for condoms either. You're trying to interact with bullshit by using logic.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:49 AM
1

Most prominent MRAs don't hate women. Most prominent feminists do. It's not the fact that Andrea Dworkin thought all men were rapists that says bad things about the feminist movement, it's the fact that she was so beloved by the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:24 PM
2

That's one. As opposed to the many who hate men.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:01 PM
7

But if the victim is a student they would have to attend classes with their rapist. Only if they've got a similar schedule. Which probably won't be the case. Especially if the victim actually was raped, which might prompt them to arrange their schedule to avoid the assailant. Part of being an adult is the ability to control your interactions with other people. Don't like someone? Avoid them. Obviously on the exceedingly rare chance it turns out to be a "false accusation", the expulsion could be …
/r/MensRights27/08/13 09:57 PM
8

This kind of lunacy is incredibly dangerous. Anyone who treats the fact that you were accused as conclusive proof that you are guilty is a threat to liberty and justice.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 09:55 PM
1

The articles isn't accusing men in general, its merely explaining why the men who do rape, rape. Because they are messed up in the head. We already knew that.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 09:51 PM
14

Punishing liars isn't going to stop people from telling the truth.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:12 PM
12

Even people who lie frequently should be able to report rape and it should be taken as seriously. There should not be a “you cried dickwolf” defense. Yes, yes there should. "This person repeatedly tells the same damn lie" is a great reason to think someone is lying. There's a reason we laugh at Charlie Brown every time he goes after the football. Lucy pulled it away the last 10 times, this one's probably going to be the same. Another thing that you missed is that I don’t mean “throw men in jail …
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:11 AM
1

Feminism includes some women who have a chip on their shoulder about men. Where are the "good" feminists?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:51 AM
1

“Check your privilege” is an arrogant phrase that really means “I know more than you. So shut up.” Wrong. It means "You know more than me. So shut up."
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:49 AM
2

Been in therapy for years Evidently not enough of them.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:46 PM
4

The good news is that after this bitch fit, Ms. Williams ended up having to leave the university. Looks like being a bigot can have consequences.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 02:50 PM
19

Don't put anything online that you don't want to go public.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 02:31 AM
21

You actually think they'll let the police department hire competent applicants rather than use quotas? Get real.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 03:07 AM
2

Oh no. That's not what he said. He said that sex is automatically something all males want all the time, and that the idea of females raping males is therefore invalid. One must wonder how he justifies the existence of gay males.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 01:49 AM
3

Peter Principle.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:08 AM
8

He's being sarcastic, no? He opposes feminism and it's supposed to be a Norwegian MRA. Look at his blog. Nope. He's been clear that men can not get raped by women. He also thinks that if affirmative action for women is OK, it's OK for men to rape women.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:03 PM
1

Eivind Berge is also the guy who said affirmative actions meant rape was OK. Ignore his ass, he's stupid and upset that he can't get laid.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:02 PM
1

Here is a good explanation of how SJWs think.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 08:44 PM
16

I suspect high school students are already familiar with the act of lying to damage the reputation of others.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:19 PM
22

A hardcore feminist doesn't care about facts.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:33 PM
56

I'd like to see women like this tour the country and give speeches about false rape accusations to high schools, colleges, police departments and women's centers. That would require them to regret what they did. And it wouldn't do much good. The cops already know that people lie. The women's centers don't care.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter