TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MacaqueOfTheNorth Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by MacaqueOfTheNorth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They did that in this study you mean?
/r/BlackPillScience05/03/23 04:14 PM
2

This could be controlled for by only comparing siblings.
/r/BlackPillScience04/03/23 08:57 PM
1

Yes
/r/BlackPillScience04/03/23 08:55 PM
3

Having a large brain is metabolically expensive and humans have all kinds of problems associated with babies having large heads, something we haven't adapted well to yet. We wouldn't have such large brains if they didn't provide an advantage.
/r/BlackPillScience26/09/22 11:16 PM
1

They don't have to. Most women I know that are my age got into a serious relationship with one of the first men they dated for a few years. They slept around more after that didn't work out.
/r/AllPillDebate18/08/22 06:15 PM
0

Women will more often fall for men they don't consider good looking because they like other things about them.
/r/AllPillDebate12/08/22 03:44 PM
1

Almost none.
/r/AllPillDebate09/08/22 02:51 AM
2

A significant minority of women who wait until their 30s discover they can't have kids any more.
/r/AllPillDebate09/08/22 02:27 AM
4

I don't know about the risk of divorce, but it's definitely a healthier age to have children. It also means you have young kids when you have more energy. Also, most women's looks begin to rapidly decline in their late 20s. Women's attractiveness peaks in their early 20s. Every year you wait, the worse will be the best man who will want to marry you. I think the main reason not to get married young is because it's harder predict what you'll both be like in the future.
/r/AllPillDebate09/08/22 02:25 AM
1

I'm Canadian and I've never heard anyone give their height in metric.
/r/AllPillDebate05/08/22 05:04 AM
1

How can the peak be at 6'6"? Wouldn't that mean some women have their minimum height that high? As a 6'3" man, I've never had a woman say I was too short, but have had some complaints about being too tall. I find these data hard to believe. Are they just noisy?
/r/AllPillDebate05/08/22 04:57 AM
1

Living with a romantic partner is, for all pratical purposes, marriage. This is probably true for the same reason that having been divorced once is predictive of divorcing again.
/r/AllPillDebate05/08/22 04:12 AM
1

Yes, but we're talking about a situation where the trait is supposedly being selected for.
/r/BlackPillScience15/04/22 02:04 PM
1

No, I'm saying that that would happen if it were selected for.
/r/BlackPillScience14/04/22 10:54 PM
1

I don't think you know what heritability is. It's not the ability to pass on genetic variants that cause a trait. It's the amount of variance in a trait that is due to genetic variation. If everyone has the same genetic variant, the heritability of the trait is zero.
/r/BlackPillScience13/04/22 03:55 PM
1

This makes no sense. First of all, the argument is that it's premenstrual syndrome which causes her to seek a new partner. If she were pregnant, she wouldn't experience premenstrual syndrome. Secondly, even if the genetic variant gets passed on to her offspring, that doesn't neccessarily make the trait more heritable. If it is being selected for, that variant will replace all others and the heritibility of the trait will go to zero.
/r/BlackPillScience13/04/22 02:41 AM
1

If everyone has the alleles for eyesight then heritability for eyesight is not zero, it's approaching 100% (not actually 100% thanks to mutation). You need to look up the definition of heritability.
/r/BlackPillScience06/04/22 01:47 AM
1

There is no opposite trait for the ability to detect light, for example. The inability to detect light. That trait was advantageous and was hence selected for by becoming more frequent in populations leading eventually to eyesight. And then once everyone has it, the heritability will be zero because there will be no variability in the genes that influence the ability to detect light.
/r/BlackPillScience05/04/22 11:24 PM
1

No, I'm not. There is effectively no difference. A trait cannot be selected for without the opposite trait being selected against. Natural selection removes disadvantageous alleles from the gene pool, reducing genetic variability and therefore heritability.
/r/BlackPillScience05/04/22 09:16 PM
2

I don't follow you. My point is that traits that are selected for become less heritable over time because the deleterious genetic variants are selected out of the gene pool.
/r/BlackPillScience15/02/22 04:41 PM
6

We confirm predictions arising from the hypothesis: PMS has high heritability; gene variants associated with PMS can be identified; animosity exhibited during PMS is preferentially directed at current partners; and behaviours exhibited during PMS may increase the chance of finding a new partner. If it was selected for, you would expect low heritability.
/r/BlackPillScience03/02/22 10:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter