TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MaleLongevity Archive

View 8 posts and 69 comments by MaleLongevity on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
279

Edu./Occu.MaleLongevity/r/MensRights15/12/25 03:45 AM
142

GeneralMaleLongevity/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:10 PM
93

HealthMaleLongevity/r/MensRights13/12/25 06:47 AM
61

Edu./Occu.MaleLongevity/r/MensRights14/12/25 05:15 AM
59

news/opinion articleMaleLongevity/r/EverydayMisandry11/12/25 06:04 PM
52

school/workMaleLongevity/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/25 04:32 AM
33

HealthMaleLongevity/r/MensRights16/12/25 09:56 AM
28

Edu./Occu.MaleLongevity/r/MensRights12/12/25 02:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

^ This. I wish more people also believed this when it comes to when we mention male risk-taking. A lot of it is often necessary for males in the hyper-competitive environment we live in. Not to mention, men are still expected to acquire more status and resources to be accepted, being still expected to earn more than their partners and be a provider for the family. To survive in such a world, risks are often necessary to acquire these resources. There will be always be a small percentage of indiv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 08:58 AM
8

I don't think there is still a clear cut reason why males live shorter than females on average. There is a lot of hypothesis but there are still a lot of caveats, which makes me think there is more to this topic and nobody is interested in researching it. People often say it is due to "XY" heterozygous chromosome, but even in birds females are heterozygous and live longer. Some people blame testosterone, but too low testosterone is often associated with poor cardiovascular health as well as immu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 08:51 AM
8

Thank you. I think this is probably the best because of the same shared environment and diet. Would be great to have a lot of these studies with the controlled environments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 08:48 AM
11

Interestingly it seems that the first documented people to reach ages 100 to 105, 108-110 were males. Which is odd since now about ~80% of the people who reach 100 are females and ~90% who reach 110 are females. This varies from countries as well, I believe in Japan 10% of people above 100 are males and in the Nordic countries it is about 20-25%. If I read cardiovascular diseases and cancer have been largely responsible for the reduced male lifespan. There seems to be much more research in women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 08:23 AM
3

Here is the study,
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 08:09 AM
1

In the fields where women are now much ahead they point to the older men from the past who are still at top as an excuse to not give a damn about boys and men falling behind. Like in this how the top Professors in Law are 60% men or what not. I wonder what excuse they will make in 20-30 years of time when it is 70-80% women at the top as well?
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 07:48 AM
60

As I stated in my other comment it does seem that women are biologically advantaged on average to live longer, but that said the gap is only 2-3 years, not 5-10 years as it is in most countries. So unfortunatelybiological factors do exist, but they are often used as an excuse to hide the 50-75% of the gap that is due to other factors. What is even worse if I remember U.N. gender erport stated that if any country female advantage in longevity was less than 6 years, it was to be a disadvantage for…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 05:29 AM
9

Not to mention, men in lower income are probably in more stress due to wanting to accomodate more resources, leading to greater stress. Men are more susceptible to cardiovascular diseases due to biology even after controlling for all factors, so stress takes more toll on the male body.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 05:24 AM
34

I did a post regarding the excessive young male deaths (15-65) in the U.S. here. The life expectancy gap in the U.S. at birth in 2023 was 5.3 years and after the age of 65 it was 2.5 years. So so much of it is probably not even biological since so many excessive males die much younger than they should. To get a better idea, I myself decided to look at "controlled samples", with male and female living in ideal conditions: A study was done 7th Day Adventists in California, who are known for their …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 05:22 AM
50

LMAO, no way this is real..... This has to be a troll....
/r/MensRights16/12/25 04:41 AM
1

On a side note, it is well replicated across global studies that males have a substantial advantage over females when it comes to visuo-spatial intelligence. In-fact, it is probably one of the only few cognitive abilties with a clear cut massive sex difference that is widely accpeted. There is also greater standard deviation for males in addition to the large mean differences leading to massive male domination as you go to the highest level. Would you be fine if this leads to a lesser representa…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 04:37 AM
2

Well men aren't really doing better at anything than women, so I'm not sure what you are talking about...
/r/MensRights16/12/25 04:13 AM
1

On a side note now that all of this is done, this is a bit unrelated but my own musings. I personally do believe that if everything was fair there would likely be much lesser men who would become doctors (~30% or so). I would attribute this to plain aptitude and interest. I've always seen much more men are drawn towards Computer Science and much more women towards Biology. This itself has a lot of biological roots as well. I would say a lot more men going into medicine in the past could also be …
/r/MensRights16/12/25 04:12 AM
1

As someone who posts in this subreddit, I'm definitely aware about all the types of users here. I don't really associate myself with anything and stay away from any form of personal discussions. Whatever I highlighted in my post, is not really some "new fodder" to be honest. This entire information is pretty much well known to everyone. So it's not that I'm pointing out something new. Even in media, nowadays the fact that boys and men are struggling with academics is something highlighted every …
/r/MensRights16/12/25 03:55 AM
1

Where did my commentary assume that the lower rates of male physicians and lawyers are necessarily a bad thing? Please directly quote from my post and I'll respond to it. I think there is a difference in how you interpreted it. I was just talking about the overall academic underachievement of boys and men, which is in general is a massive issue, especially for a lot of them it will prevent them from pursuing careers and not having a good standard of life. I do personally understand myself that h…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 03:40 AM
1

Also I don't understand what you're even accomplishing by posting this here? Especially when it seems you yourself have neither read the study? What is the context here, to say that men are inherently slightly awful on average at surgery so boys should not be given the chance to become doctors? What if there was a study with the other way around for women? You do realize the effect size is still relatively small? I know it can be crucial since we are dealing with deaths of patients, but still, t…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 02:38 AM
2

The study itself concludes that there is an "association" and it did not prove that surgeon gender causes a better outcome. There was a robust finding of a lower mortality for patients of female surgeons, but the effect size is still quite modest, and the certainty was medium not high. There were also no differences found for readmission and complications and the certainity was quite low. This was a meta-analysis of various studies, each of which adjusted for different confounders. It looks like…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 02:25 AM
2

Wonderful! I see new research pretty much everyday about how women are better at everything. I'm quite sure if it was the other way around more papers and articles would be posted... Since women are so great at this surgery thing, can they stop wasting educational resources and start working full time? Or will men continue to subsidize them as they go into an early grave?
/r/MensRights16/12/25 01:47 AM
2

I think you're really understimating the sex differences in upper body physical strength nor taking into account the normal distributions.... I do not deny that there are some women that are physically capable, nor am I questioning the courage or achievements of female snipers. It is not just about individuals, but the question is also about whether the military can reliabily staff front-life infantry units based on both population level capability and long term sustainability. Videos of excepti…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:45 PM
1

100%. I forgot to mention about extra-curriculars and other factors as well since just test scores and grades don't always tell everything. So yes, it is definitely not so objective. Anyways, the qualifications of both male and female candidates seem to be quite similar. So, I would personally say a lot of this could just be due to males being less interested in medicine on average. Interestingly in 2019, 25.8k candidates were males as compared to 26.8k females. For 2026, 23k were males compreae…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:22 PM
-2

Yes, but that is for niche roles. You want female infantry to carry 60-100lbs of loads? Carry around wounded 6'2 250lbs fellow men? Sprinting, jumping etc. Not to mention the greater stress, sleep deprivation, as well as risks of injuries (which women are more susceptible to due to biology) involved. I highly doubt that women would want to piss and crap out in a MRE bag in front of fellow soldiers. Not to mention males due to biology have an urge to protect and keep females safe. Not to mention …
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:01 PM
-11

Unfortunately, physical strength itself is not the only advantage which males have when it comes to warfare. Tests done by the U.S. military have also looked at the inefficiency of mixed sex squads. Males obviously have greater physical strength, more muscle mass, and lesser fat. Even when males and females that are equally muscular, males are generally still stronger. However, even if both are equally strong or fit, men can mantain their fitness much more easily than women, males can gain muscl…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 09:53 PM
-20

Yes based on nature, women should not serve in front line combat at all. Males have literally evolved for this for millions of years and you can't override biology. That said to be fair, women definitely should be conscripted and serve in non-frontline roles where they can contribute.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 07:51 PM
-16

You can't override biology.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 07:49 PM
4

Edit: I forgot to take into account other factors like extra-curriculars as I realied later. I found more interesting data regarding this: A-21: MCAT Scores and GPAs for Applicants to U.S. Medical Schools by Gender, 2018-2019 through 2025-2026 A-22: MCAT Scores and GPAs for Matriculants to U.S. Medical Schools by Gender, 2018-2019 through 2025-2026. For 2025-26: For applicants: Mean MCAT Score: 508.4 (9.3 SD) for males vs 504.8 (10.2) SD for females. GPA Science: 3.61 (0.4 SD) for males vs 3.54 …
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:27 PM
41

Even worse than having less and less educated or even just illiterate men is the high amount of highly educated women with a victim complex. That's really the biggest worry for me as well, especially those "highly educated" women with Gender Studies PhDs. Those will be our future leaders. Men will stay pay overwhelming amount of the taxes and still do most of the toughest jobs to keep technology and infrastructure up and running. These will further use men's tax money to waste more resources on …
/r/MensRights15/12/25 08:12 AM
23

The percentage of women is further increasing and even in fields which we consider "male" dominated, is much higher than we think. Business: In the U.S. in 2022, women earned 46.5% of the Bachelor's[1][2], women earned 49.6% of the Master's[3][4], and 49.94% of the Doctorates[5][6]. In 2023 many top universities in the U.S. had a significant proprtion of female MBAs: George Washington (65%), Johns Hopkins Carey (51%), UPenn Wharton (50%), Penn State Smeal (50%), Northwestern University Kellogg (…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:40 AM
25

Same usual recipe: Men and boys falling behind by a lot? Point to the few outliers that are doing well. This is analogous to saying that black people are not oppressed in the U.S. because there are a lot of black millionaires and super stars who are overrepresented in the NBA and NFL. Even if you don't care about the rights of men and boys, having so many uneducated and broken men is a recipe for disaster. Boys have been doing worse in education 100+ years but no effort has ever been put with on…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/25 05:40 AM
5

Before getting emotionally unhinged, I would advise you to think clearly. Based on CDC Wonder in the U.S from 2018-2023: 60,564 women committed suicide, with a crude rate of 6.0 per 100,000. 26,882 women died due to homicide, with a crude rate of 2.7 per 100,000. A woman in the U.S. is 2.2 times more likely to kill herself (a woman) rather than be killed by someone else.... 9,036,205 died during this period, 0.30% percent of the deaths due to homicide. Reality is not like your TV shows, homicide…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 04:08 AM
-3

If I recall cats and dogs are often more friendly towards women than men. This is in general true for other animals as well who are often more hostile towards men than women. Dogs can usually tell apart the sexes by smell and there is evidence that cats can also do this. So it won't really be surprising if cats as such find men more intimidating than women.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 02:26 AM
10

I'll try to find sources regarding this, but ever since the beginning, men: have gotten worse grades in college been more likely to not complete on time more likely to drop out It is possible that more women might have dropped out in the past, but that was to get married I believe. Men's struggle in college and academics in general has always gone unnoticed and I believe there isn't enough awareness or intiatives to help men perform better and stay in college.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 05:39 AM
9

It's not just gay men, but a lot of straight men also sexually abuse and rape boys as well, especially in third world countries. A lot of the sexual abusers are opportunists and don't care about the gender often. This should be a less taboo topic and more awareness must be raised about this to ensure boys feel comfortable in coming out about this.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 06:02 AM
11

Another thing I would like to point is that men are much more likely to get heart disease unlike contrary belief. Based on the Framingham Heart Study, conducted for decades, men are 3-10 times as likely to develop heart disease even after controlling for all factors. If you calculate your heart attack risk, you'll see sex is the number one variable for all variation. Not to mention heart attacks also much more deadly for men. You'll often see equal amount of men and women dying, however, men on …
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/25 05:52 AM
5

A lot of people often point out that women are more likely to get dementia, heart diseases, strokes etc. but if you actually look into the statistics one of the main reasons is that there are much less men than women that even make it past 65+ onwards due to the life expectancy gap. Once you get 80+ its 60%+ females. So women are living longer in worse health because they are actually living! Men don't even long enough to get in that health. Another good example is heart disease, it is often sai…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/25 05:41 AM
18

I remember during the COVID-19 pandemic, they were saying that "toxic masculinity" is killing off men. No one pointed out that the disease was much more deadly to men even after controlling all factors due to biology. Men were twice as likely to die, more likely to be hospitalized, as well as have more long term damage even after controlling all other factors including lifestyle. Here is a good article on this as well. There was absolutely no compassion. Just blaming men for being "stupid" and t…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/25 05:26 AM
21

Look up bacha bazi in Afghanistan. Despite contrary belief, boys are sexually exploited at similar if not higher rates even in homophobic third world countries. For a lot of these abusers it is easy to get away with abusing boys since no one expects it and add to this boys also have additional stigma from speaking up. Edit: Here are some sources that I was able to find. Based on the Government of India Ministry of Women and Child Development in 2007, boys made up 53% of the underage victims of s…
/r/MensRights13/12/25 12:35 AM
45

It's appalling that men die on average younger in pretty much every country yet there are almost no health policies targetting men. Edit: Added a figures showing additional men dying younger in the United States. As many extra men die aged 15-65 (~1.26 million in 2023) as the approx total war fatalities of the U.S. in its 249 year history (1.30 million) : <image> At birth a male is expected to live to 75.8 compared to 81.1 for a female. After age 65, a male is expected to live to 83.2 as compare…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/12/25 11:46 PM
1

You can't override biology.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:34 PM
32

That girls and women used to lag behind in education, at least in the western countries, such as the United States. There are also reports that they were discriminated against and treated badly in schools This has never really been the case, girls have always gotten better grades for the last 100+ years. Where boys did well was on standardized testing, rather than making the classroom environment more friendly to the boys and remove the biases, it was determined that these "tests are biased agai…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 06:53 PM
8

WEEA, they claimed girls were in crisis in education when in reality girls were doing just as well as boys I would suggest reading this if you have time: The Myth That Schools Shortchange Girls by Judith Kleinfeld since she wrote it completely debunking the narrative of girls in crisis when WEEA ammendment (1994) was passed. It is a very common misinformation that boys did well academically or just as well and that Title IX (1972), WEEA (1974), and the WEEA ammendment (1994) helped "close the ga…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 04:25 PM
4

That's a good thing I could've added to the charts. I was able to find this (page 84): 1870 - 1.3% of 18-24 year old 1900 - 2.3% of 18-24 year old 1940 - 9.1% 1950 - 14.3% 1959 - 23.8% 1970 - 35.8% 1979 (women surpass men for the first time) - 38.8% 1980 - 40.2% That would be a great analysis to do. My point was to show that there never has been that "college gap" which feminists love talking about. Even when there were much more males, it was still a very small percentage of the population. Wom…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 04:11 PM
2

I will try do more research and make some more elaborate post on this topic since this is something really important. I will at least do it from the US point of view because the general view amongst people has been that the Title IX Act (1972) helped "close the college gap", apparently women were only ~43% of the students at that time. The truth is, the percentage of men was inflated due to veterans enrolling as well as men dodging the Vietnam draft. In 1990's feminists also declared that U.S. s…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/12/25 03:54 PM
12

From what I recall, women are more likely to get into minor accidents. They were also more likely to fail their driving test, even though they on average scored higher on the written test. Women are definitely on average worse at maneuvering motor vehicles due to their lower visuo-spatial and navigational ability. However, risk taking behaviors are still much more common in men, so the worst and deadliest crashes are still done by men, though a very small minority.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 06:18 AM
10

While that is true, men are still resonsible for the most deadliest accidents. That said its still a small percentage of high risk taking morons, not men as a whole like people like to generalize demonize men as a whole. It's still discrimination.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 06:14 AM
3

They claim healthcare (medicine and nursing) is not STEM to try to reduce the percentage. But the problem is, even without those ,women are still 40%+ of STEM, and will very likely soon be the majority in a decade or so. I wonder how they'll justify the "STEM gap"?
/r/MensRights12/12/25 04:26 AM
4

If it wasn't for veterans, women would have surpassed men in college back in the 1940s-50s itself in the United States...
/r/MensRights12/12/25 02:49 AM
4

Colleges like MIT are quite open with the fact they deliberately enroll more female students for equity to maintain 50-50 in all Engineering programs. Not to mention they've always had the female acceptance rate at 2-2.2x all the time. Not to mention the percentage of females in these programs in selective colleges for Engineering, Physics, and CS are higher than those for less-selective colleges (based on SAT Math scores). A lot of them have higher acceptance rate for femael candidates. This is…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 10:09 PM
7

The funny thing is that this not just applies to education but just in general. The UN Gender Gap manipulates the data to look like women are doing worse in developed countries. The funniest thing that they do is they assume that women on natural have a "6 year advantage" when it comes to life expectancy, therefore any country where the gap is less, it shoulds a lesser female advantage. Developed countries like Iceland and Norway lose points because men only live 3 years less as compared to coun…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 09:48 PM
9

<image> Here are some more data: Lesser boys than girls have gotten high school diplomas in the United States since 1860 for all years except for one or two. This is despite the fact there are more boys than girls in the United States. Boys have gotten worse grades even in Science and Math for 110+ years. Women earned ~20% of Bachelors degreein 1900, 30% in 1920, 40% in 1930. In 1944, the G.I. Bill was introduced which allowed veterans to get into college, this inflated the percentage of males e…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/12/25 09:37 PM
26

100%. In the U.S., they don't include Healthcare (Medicine + Nursing) under "STEM", otherwise women would be 60%+. But you know the funny thing? Even if you exclude healthcare, women are still not underrepresented in STEM (40%+)!! Science (S): The only sciencs with disparities are Physics (~70% male) and Biology (~66% female), others are quite 50-50 Math (M): Women have made up 40-45% of Math and Statistics majors, so they are not even trailing behind in that. So-much for the "Math gap" The only…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:47 PM
13

The funniest thing that I've personally seen is that girls are more likely to take advanced Math and Science coursework in the United States as well as are overrepresented amongst those with the highest GPAs: If you look at the Math and Science standardized tests across all states in the United States, boys do just as well and are overrepresented amongst the top scorers. This is despite them on average being much worse prepared due to reasons I just stated as well as the fact studies show they o…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:41 PM
2

Note: My comment is not meant to be a "male" vs "female" or recognizing one as superior as inferior. I believe both sexes are quite different and have evolved over millions of years to be completely complementary to each other. Both on average have singificant advantages and disadvantages and we must realize there is more diversity amongst males and females then there is differences between them. However, a lot of these differences are exemplified amongst the outliers. There are lot of bad thing…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:14 PM
15

I wish eveyone please read this: The Myth That Schools Shortchange Girls: Social Science in the Service of Deception by Judith Kleinfeld. It'll open your eyes about the reality. Boys and men have doing worse academically than girls and women for about 150+ years now and the college enrollment has been lower for about 60+years. A lot of people point out to "gender gaps" that don't even exist to make it seem like girls and women are falling behind. I know a lot of us think that while women are doi…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/12/25 06:08 PM
8

I agree. The way this is put off comes as quite immature and involves ad hominem which seems to minimize its credibility. However, I can understand why there are a lot of emotions involved with it when you know the truth. Think about it, men and boys in the United States: Have been falling behind in education for decades. They have been doing worse in education for 150+ years and enrolling in college at lower rates for 60+ years. Despite this, multiple intiatives, scholarships, events etc. have …
/r/MensRights11/12/25 05:24 PM
5

People think that "women's empowerment" with more and more women outnumbering men in work and education will resolve this. They don't realize the following: Women are much more likely to pick college majors with the worst economic return of investment and therefore end up in heavy college debts. Not to mention, women have many more extra scholarships despite already out-numbering men. Despite the Title IX violation, there are way more female only scholarships. All of these are subsidized by male…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 05:10 PM
20

The funniest thing about this issue is, if you look at the majority of those who support transgenders and having in biological women's sports and spaces, it is predominantly women, especially leftist/progressive women. A lot of those TERFs literally blame and demonize men as a whole for all of this, not realizing women themselves are the biggests supporter of this happening, so the irony is lost there. Considering how awfully they have treated boys and mens for decades and literally demonized an…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 02:47 PM
24

What I'm really apalled by in the United States is the least concern that mothers seem to have for their boys falling behind even further in education. Boys have been doing worse academically for the last 150+ years and enrolling in colleges at lower rates for 60+ years. All you see is Girls in STEM workshop, despite the fact girls have been getting better grades in Science and Math and are more likely to take advanced coursework in those subjects for the last 40+ years.
/r/MensRights10/12/25 05:11 PM
11

Feminists are literally influencing American Heart Association (AHA) and using false statistics to hide the fact that men are 3-10 times more likely to have heart diseases even after controlling for all parameters. They are using misleading statistics to hide the fact that the men dying from heart attack are in their 60s and 70s, meanwhile the women are in their 80's and 90's. Not to mention a lot of their claim about all past experiments being done on men has so much caveats as well. This is re…
/r/MensRights14/11/25 04:00 AM
44

Well great! If you don't care about men then feel free to stop living on the taxes, infrastructure, services, and technology that is disproportionately provided to by men. I would suggest moving to an island with all the misandrists and start from scratch.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/11/25 04:45 AM
59

A lot of them don't even have so for the boys, from what I've seen how many teachers innately treated boys.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/11/25 04:43 AM
6

The thing I've seen about Reeves is that at time he seems to genuinely know about a lot of the issues, but still panders to the feminists. I think in the current climate saying anything that might suggest even any remotely bad done by anyone who happens to be a women or pointing out the idea there might be discrimination against men is a literal career suicide. While he's a quite clear bootlicker and trojan horse, he's made a lot of reasonable points: Pointed out that companies might be discrimi…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:21 AM
24

The only people I've mainly heard talking about the "Male Loneliness Epidemic" are women and/or feminists. Regarding feminists whether liberal or radical, I've can never take any nonsense which they say seriously, especially after once you know the truth.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:08 AM
1

Regarding your pain tolerance it is not entirely true. This has nothing do with sexism, knowing this is very important, especially when you are treating your patients. Not knowing about sex differences can literally be deadly for your patients. Females tend to have much more cutaneous nerve endings than males. From what I recall, there are no studies that measured the entire body, but a study found that women had twice as many nerve fibers in their faces as men do (Mowlavi et al., 2005) Another …
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:26 PM
1

The fact women are excluded or underrepresented from medical research is not even true at all and debunked so many times before. You can continue to believe in feminist grandieurs of delusions. The reality is much more different than you actually think it is. By the way, you just mentioned women suffer from heart attacks equally and that isn't something that is false, but it is so misrepresented that it is dangerous. Please put aside all your ideologies and read this carefully. This is really im…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:22 PM
2

God knows how many are there actually by merit....
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:00 PM
27

The funny thing is if you ask them why 60+% of college students are women or why girls and women get better grades academically, they'll just something like how women are more disciplined/conscientious/smarter etc. Women being 80% of a field or being ahead in something is because they're just simply better. Men being the majority or being ahead in something because they're somehow conspiring to push women down or discriminating against them. It's really awful how much accepted that is. So many p…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 02:56 PM
3

Well to be fair males do have much more genetic diversity, so they are overrepresented amongst both the bottom and the top. But yes, in terms of the most advanced physical and intellectual achievements, it's always going to be predominantly males.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/25 09:09 PM
1

Any who thinks Feminism "benfits men", please read this: Hello. I am a woman, mother of 3 and cardiologist who works with the American Heart Association. I need to share a little information about feminism and medical politics in the United States. (xpost /r/self). Also read up the posts on the Framingham study. Feminists point out that as much or more women die from heart disease, and how past studies did not include women or its not a "man's disease". But the truth is, if you look at the avera…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 09:07 PM
1

I just read the Framingham Heart Study. This is so depressing. What's even worse is how feminists are literally trying to hide it. There are literal awareness campaigns about heart attacks in women and they talk about how "equal amount of women die", obviously conveniently forgetting those women are dying of old age in their 80's/90's unlike the men in their 60's/70's. They tried to do the same thing during the COVID as well, blaming men and trying to victimize women instead of pointing out to t…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 10:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter