TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Marvinkmooneyoz Archive

View 6 posts and 369 comments by Marvinkmooneyoz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-6

While the different political camps each relate somewhat differently to the issues, both catered and made unwise compromises, though I’ll grant mostly with good intentions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 04:47 PM
1

I’m not against minimum wage to protect the common person. But pro sports is elite and there’s no reason for artificial pay models. Market value makes sense. No reason for equal pay other then equal viewing numbers
/r/MensRights11/07/26 12:08 PM
-2

Who pays depends on who asked who out. If it was an undeniable two way attraction when they meet before they plan their first date ok both pay but if it’s one person asking the other, then the one asking should pay.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 04:54 PM
2

Because evolution doesn’t have our happiness as its goal. The genes are whose “happy” with those shitty husbands even if the organism isn’t
/r/seduction31/05/26 10:45 PM
1

Evolution selects for things, all life forms are especially well suited to their niche relative to other life forms. Women have their ability, and it includes sussing out those attributes that evolution has selected them to care about.
/r/seduction31/05/26 10:45 PM
22

Everything is unique and everything has similarities to everything else. Comparisons are always valid in themselves though context of course decides if people are acting in good faith or trying to derail
/r/MensRights30/05/26 05:06 AM
6

Mixed bag. More concepts have been fleshed out, but our culture isn’t objective about which we emphasize. Fewer men do physical labor, but more utilize a gym. We have more diversity of foods at our grocery store, but nutrient density is lower. Fewer men are drinking excessively or smoking tobacco. More are doing pills or fentanyl. More men were domestic abusers back when. Now fewer men feel they can speak up to defend themselves. It’s a mixed bag for sure
/r/MensRights27/05/26 08:32 PM
1

Well we are over populated so I think we have a moral obligation to take that into account
/r/MensRights21/05/26 08:13 PM
1

Well for one I think it’s god advice to not hate any being. Even the worst monsters in history, hate some of their attributes but not them. Even if we decide we have to do something drastic, like kill a mass shooter to limit the number of victims, we can make that decision and act accordingly without having hate. We can take measure to limit faxcism without having hate in our hearts. Women instead well off countries have sort of lost perspective, this is a common theme on here. But they are hard…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 08:12 PM
-8

Depends on the society.the Muslim world is bad to women part of it is genuine terribly to them
/r/MensRights17/05/26 03:41 PM
2

They might on average be a small bit smarter. Better behaves and studious in their youth a little. But the tough tough stuff there are more men doing
/r/MensRights16/05/26 12:31 AM
1

“Over” 13 years comes across as desperate. Try “pretty much” 13 years
/r/seduction13/05/26 05:41 PM
14

INSTANTLY attractive? Looks and recognition/preselection, such as a celebrity.
/r/seduction11/05/26 04:25 PM
5

I suspect that anti homosexual sentiment has more to do with STDs although I think it’s not a consciously reasoned thing. Males that want to have sex with males have potential to spread stds at a higher rate due to male sexual willingness versus female coyness
/r/MensRights09/05/26 06:31 PM
-1

Yes and no. I’m concerned about and am willing to support men’s rights causes. But evolution made beings be selfish and petty in so many ways, I try to not let myself suffer as a result
/r/MensRights09/05/26 06:01 PM
-4

It’s an apt comparison in some ways, this is how women feel about men at least in terms of dating g
/r/MensRights08/05/26 06:08 PM
1

It’s not as specifically looks as genetics in general. A less good looking person with clear smarts and social skills might still satisfy the first category despite lack of money
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:33 PM
0

Economics is tricky. Our population is so high and polluting, and pollution past a certain point is very bad for the economy.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 01:15 AM
-3

I don’t know what women in the gunpowder and flying drone era would do if men all went passive for some reason, but it’s safe to say that female human violience is way tame compared to men. There’s never been any nomad warring pillaging group primarily comprised of woman, there have been female political readers of course who have made warring decisions
/r/MensRights25/04/26 04:48 PM
3

I’d clarify that people consciously have good intentions often enough but the subconscious wins out when it comes to action
/r/MensRights05/04/26 05:53 PM
1

Both political parties in America have done their share of giving in to special interests including (I know it’s crazy to call women’s rights a special interest but regarding how politics works) women’s rights. Less right leaning American politics has gone for some arbitrary virtue signaling PC culture which is problematic, but as far as real policy they are hardly singularly to blame for the things complained about on here.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 02:12 PM
1

The very concept, though, of “base” attractiveness is problematic. If someone sees an ugly personal not knowing anything about them, their initial attraction will be low, then they might after the fact find out they are famous and rich and smart and funny, and then be attractive. Here we would link base attraction with looks. But what of someone whose reputation precedes them as rich and famous, but the women haven’t seen yet? Likely enough they will be attracted without seeing them, so the base…
/r/seduction31/01/26 01:10 AM
1

Different situations at different times in different places. One piece of evidence is the overwhelming preference for male kin as royal successors, but also the stewards of property for the extended family. Arranged marriages, While often being decided by parents or others for both single males and single females, is also often forced on the females but not on the males (as in a single male negotiates/convinces parents to arrange their daughter). For basically ever women have been excluded from …
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:38 PM
-6

See I don’t think those are the technical definition. To feel something isn’t a prerequisite, jsut the ability to understand.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 05:45 PM
-2

I’ve read that high charisma ohsycopaths have often been described as “high in empathy”, helping the, be better at mentally and emotionally torturing victims. So at least by the definition they were using, empathy means ability to understand/predict others emotional state.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 05:44 PM
-26

I think that’s close to the definition Of empathy, no?
/r/MensRights04/01/26 12:48 PM
0

american electoral system it’s hard to place too much blame on Biden. Any further left and then he’s not representing a large fraftion of his constituency. Further right and enough democrats will stop supporting him. what should have Biden done thst he could have?
/r/MensRights26/12/25 11:40 PM
5

Yes but there are distinctions between how different politicAl parties handle the issues. Realistically both American parties have been pandering to special interests for a wile, and in a wierd way women have been a special interest, in that both parties have rewarded lop-sided, poorly thought through policies and interpretations.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 11:12 PM
1

Hmm well I was voluntarily celibate from 0-9, then involuntarily celibate for a time thereafter until I reached sexual age of consent. I hope this teacher didnt say it insultingly. As far as stopping people from continuing to be incel, it’s really more about societal conditions then an individuals attitude or worldview.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 03:14 AM
3

The thing is, they aren’t being objective. They take note of men they like, and they take note of men that actively creep them out. But they don’t take not of most men at all, and so don’t include them in their thinking of what men are like or what life is like for men as a category. So all the “patriarchy” stuff (real for most of history and still in some of the world but not the west ) or how likely men are to cheat, stuff that applies to the men they want to be with, but it’s not like the ave…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 11:18 PM
1

Yes, but talking like things are already happening is potentially problematic. I for one dont like to act like I know a woman likes me romantically or sexually until I know they do.
/r/seduction24/04/25 06:30 AM
0

Honestly in this climate I don't know if i can date at all
/r/seduction03/04/25 01:37 PM
1

If they were random 10 men random 10 women, then I think they average the same. The question about the extreme ends of bell curves is really different. It sure seems like for most activities, the best in the world are just very likely to be men. But there is a reverse, men are more represented at the bottom of these curves, there are more truly deformed and mentally disabled males.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 10:27 PM
2

Hmm, weird for this to be the law in a communism. I wonder about the details, if its something like "you have to have your parents stay with you", thats a bit different then "you are solely economically accountable for them", which would go against supposed communist ideals.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 08:46 PM
2

While i can understand the thinking that goes into wanting to make such a decision, let's take a step back, gain perspective, and look at cause and effect. If you engage in consensual heterosexual sexual relations (or are the cause of nonconsensual sex) then you might get someone pregnant. If you get someone pregnant, then thats a person that needs to be taken care of. Being, what, someones boyfriend after theyve had a kid isnt causing that person to exist. Its wrong to coerse someone to pay thi…
/r/MensRights09/09/24 08:45 PM
2

WEll, gee, I hear whore being used all the time interchangably with slut
/r/MensRights02/09/24 01:03 AM
2

Whatever word or term is used in a clinical technical manner for involuntarily celibate people is going to get used later as a general insult.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 12:45 AM
2

Empathy doesn't neccarily lead to exhibitions of concern. Empathy really just means understanding/vicariously experiencing others points of view. What one does with that empathy is really a different thing entirely.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 09:28 PM
1

Ai is very animate, the number of calculations happening is immense.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 07:04 PM
3

Understanding the sexes is difficult enough even IF you are well versed in evolutionary psychology. It's far more difficult without it. Watching people go on about sexual psychology and how men and women are different is like watching pre-schoolers confident in their explanation of something very complicated like how computers work.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 10:09 AM
7

At one point they started taking piano lessons, not yet with professional aspirations, not yet dedicating 8 hours a day to the skills.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 09:58 AM
46

Generally, the very very best at most things are men, even if women on average are better. The evolutionary logic checks out: Men have more to gain by being extremely good at something. The status can bring large reproductive success. Womens reproductive success is inherently limited, they can have 1 MAYBE a few babies per year, and their bodies experience cumulative stress after multiple births. Evolution makes men willing to do risky things that might kill them, or might confer great status up…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 09:55 AM
1

I don't know if feminism is really "one thing", at least not anymore. There is feminism with regards to women in oppressive countries, of which there are many. There is feminism with regards to things like abortion issues, rape kit backlog, eetc. Then there is the feminism that this sub rightly criticizes, feminism that is just a greedy movement, beyond fairness of equality, but just about advancing womens status.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 04:26 PM
-3

Since female biology is more complicated then male biology, I think, in a manner of speaking, we can say its underfunded even while receiving more money. A lot of the asymmetry that this sub talks about, I agree with, but this is one I'm ok with.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 05:04 AM
1

woman-hater is the only one i can think of. Misogynist doesnt directly imply HATE.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 07:16 PM
1

looksmatch is a problematic parameter. Attractiveness is a composite of several attributes. Generally, men find women better looking then vice versa so the real "match" is the totality of ones attractive attrbiutes. So a great looking woman might find the rich guy 20 years older then her the more overall attractive match then the good looking decently off guy.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 07:13 PM
4

Domestic abuse by men towards their sexual partner or partners kids is WAYYYYY higher then violence by incels, orders of magnitude higher. One incel shooting and people actually think this is some epidemic
/r/MensRights05/02/24 07:03 PM
5

The phenomenon is more widespread then you might think
/r/MensRights05/02/24 07:00 PM
2

Of course YOUD say that, you lincoln-log cabin loving, snorkel-blasting, disestablishmentarianist!! EDIT: just found out those terms dont mean what i thought they mean, I apologize.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 06:57 PM
2

Certainly not a given that an incel hates themselves, or even neccesarily the situation they are in. What do you have against red-pill? Agree with you otherwise, good post But be careful about such posts, REDDIT in general is looking for excuses to take down this sub, and also, the mods do take down stuff that is related to the topic of mensrights, but leaning in the direction of what some of the banned subs were about.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 06:56 PM
27

The "funny" thing is, statistically, incels are WAY less dangerous then non-incels. Ones own domestic partner is much much much more likely to cause physical abuse then some involuntarily celibate man.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 10:04 PM
1

Maybe to a degree, but really, regular plain ol' evolution is usually the most relevant factor in these things. Male and female selective pressures have pushed these categories into two different modes of being, two different mind-sets. Women get pregnant and are stuck with one, MAYBE a few more, babies for at least 9 months. Men, potentially, women willing, can just go impregnanting non-stop. So males of almost every sexually reproducing species are more gung-ho about sex with just about any fe…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 04:12 AM
3

I’d say it was that it precisely WASNT woke that was th4 problem. It was quite naive and assumptive
/r/MensRights19/01/24 02:13 PM
8

Give me some context: are people not generally allowed access to public transportation cctv? If you lose something, or think something happened?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 12:19 AM
0

I'm not against some government colleges having some degree of such selection process, but why should the ELITE institutions?
/r/MensRights12/01/24 01:55 PM
6

What sort of stuff did he say?
/r/MensRights08/01/24 12:53 AM
2

I dont rmember the details well enough, but I remember thinking it was perhaps insightful to America up until maybe 1990, moreso 50s and 60s. If it took place then, they could use the same plot and that shpeel. It just doesnt translate to modern day America.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 03:43 PM
-24

its a fine definition, as long as other sexual assaults are given severe consequences. Rape is a phenomenon in the natural world that can lead to pregnancy against the desires of the female, and thus can lead to willing-to-rape genes being propegated. So this phenomenon deserves its own word, and this has been the word for it in the past. Now somebody forcing someone else to, say, take some other object in an orifice, should be givin a sever consequence, at least jail time.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 06:02 AM
2

Most peoples ethics isnt based on anything objective. People just have their instinctive sensibilities, some of which concern social rules, but that doesnt mean they are in a position to talk about the philosophy of social rules. If someone is creeped out by some person, that is what it is, you cant insist that they shouldnt be creeped out. But if They insist EVERYONE should be creeped out by the same person, that is them lacking objectivity, or the same if they arent creeped by someone that ano…
/r/MensRights26/12/23 06:15 PM
15

Ive been working with the belief that for most of the hunter-gatherer period, men did more of the protein obtaining, and women more of the calorie obtaining. Im not a stubborn person about the social sciences, but I'd need both direct evidence and some sort of evolutionary explanation to change my mind. The visual perception differences between the sexes seems to correlate with the sex-division of food jobs. Men like to scan horizons, women are better at pattern discerning, women seem to be bett…
/r/MensRights20/12/23 06:52 PM
1

I’m saying, even if the GOP doesn’t become the party of a specific denomination and doctrine, it can still become a sort of politically convenient compromise of the sorts of Christian that vote for them. I’m not suggesting the leadership of a specific church organization are going to take over the GOP
/r/MensRights13/12/23 06:45 PM
1

Alright, then of becoming an evangelical+baptist party that isn’t totally tied to a specific denomination
/r/MensRights13/12/23 06:38 PM
5

Right WING, I agree, they arent. Right of center I think is accurate.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:54 AM
3

In America at least, there is reason to believe that either the Republican party is moving towards an officially Christian party, or the GOP will split and one faction will be such, so I think it's relevant in the context of USA politics these days
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:53 AM
11

WEll at least on reddit there was MGTOW/MGTOW2/INCEL, to discuss the difficulty or even impossibility of dating for men.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 02:03 AM
9

The right at least in well-to-do countries is on board just as much as the left regarding such issues
/r/MensRights03/12/23 02:02 AM
0

I was commenting on the "stronger then most men" comment.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 05:46 AM
-6

WEll, smaller guys are usually less strong, that was the word in the post i was countering. More fit then most men, absolutely, but at 135 i wouldnt have thought so. 150 is much closer to average weight, so with his fitness he might legit be stronger then most men.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 03:43 AM
1

I mean, past a certain amount of money, you become sexy of course, but I never thought of Bill Gates as a "sex symbol". But yeah maybe there are just a certain category of wierd women out there!
/r/MensRights29/11/23 03:39 AM
-2

Holland is fit, but he's small. I bet hes 135 pounds.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:18 AM
1

Mrilyn Manson had sexuality as a big part of his thing, so maybe by a loose definition of "sex symbol", he counts, but was anyone considering him sexy?
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:18 AM
15

WOmen are as much fooling themselves about themselves as they are signaling or lying
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:31 PM
13

Yes, we are so removed from most of history, that we dont really realize the coming consequences.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:28 PM
4

Was this what women SAID they wanted, or did they do the hard work of figuring out how this attributes actually get weighed?
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:04 PM
3

For the most part, it is between a right-of center party and a political theater party
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:28 PM
2

A) the Republican party, essentially, is rotten at the core. This doesnt mean they are all corrupt politicians, it doesnt mean their stance on every issue is problematic, it doesnt mean too much for LOCAL politics, but it is the nature of the current GOP. I cant vote for this party anymore. B) On the surface, the American left seems more problematic for mens rights, and maybe it is, but its more an optics thing, politicians everywhere and both parties, are largely giving in to the "special inter…
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:27 PM
2

While some of those shows have genuine idiot female characters, for sure the numbers are skewed towards the men. My opinion is, women/girls being thought of as uncapable is, really, still too much of a sore subject, given it wasnt TOO long ago that the prevailing belief was they couldnt excel at science/philosophy/business/leadership/innovation. I'd argue there is also something in us that considers most men "expendable" in both the little and the big ways, and that people generally have MUCH le…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:02 PM
1

That is still media of course. Media is, in some ways, more diverse then ever before, but also sort of merging in terms of message. The things that people upvote and algorithms choose for are NOT diverse
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:51 PM
1

What EVER term becomes normal to describe "Involuntary Celibates" will automatically very shortly thereafter become used as an insult. Its very telling. Thats why i take a stand, and act like Im confused why they are using the term in contexts where it doesnt make sense, assuming the originaly definition
/r/MensRights17/09/23 06:30 AM
0

"Full" of, absolutely not. Lots of people here have real issues, like having no custody of their kids/visitation for no real reason. Incels, we really shouldnt be even acknowledging the use of the term unless they are using it correctly. Access to sex isnt really a mens rights issue per se. Yes, there are vocal anti-feminists on this group, plenty that lack persepctive. But this is a VALID issue, and a valid group, and there is a lot of very real productive conversation on here.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:17 AM
1

Like every being, they dont deserve hate, which they do get a lot of, not just the discomfort, thats one thing, but the receive real hate by a lot of people. For everyday purposes, I accept them as the gender of their desire. I'm no doctor, but if I was, just as I would insist on being refered to "Doctor Marvinkmooneyoz" in context of medical matters, I would refer to them as male or female depending on the nature of the medical issue. If it was an ear ache, their preference. If its related to t…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:07 PM
5

Mature is a biological term, they hit certain marks sooner, they generally start puberty sooner. I wonder, on average are girls technically able to reproduce earlier? Or reach their full height sooner? It seems odd to say they mature faster if we are literally only talking about the START of puberty
/r/MensRights31/08/23 08:04 AM
7

WOmen vote, own property and businesses, drive, don't have legal curfew that is sex-specific, can get education, can start a religion, can hold political office. Yes, a FEW men have outlandish economic power in our society, skewing averages that might be misleading about who makes how much money. But men are not really overall advantaged compared to woman (at least in the US) Some states are doing some strange things right now regarding sexual rights, so it might be fair to say some states in th…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:07 AM
0

Men have a bigger intelligence distribution, that is, more full blown retarded/mentally handicapped people, and also more geniuses. men are evolved to be more naturally competitive. For any activity, more men are going to sink major amount of time in to it, and really do that tedious work on every tiny facet of it, as opposed to "just enjoy it" Men and women have somewhat different intellectual specialties. In our ancestral environment were we evolved, men were for the most part hunters and wome…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:53 PM
2

Yes and no, its going have to be context specific. If they are treated assumptively in the same way biologically born men are, then it fits in mens rights. I dont know how courts handle child custody situations if they find out one parent is trans male, if they treat such a person they would a bio male or a bio female. I imagine that info is always known by the court at least.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 10:47 AM
-6

of course YOUD say that, youre a poindexter /s
/r/MensRights03/06/23 01:18 PM
2

for a good amount of time before evolution starts selecting against enjoying such things
/r/MensRights19/04/23 05:58 PM
1

WOmen are only remembering the men theyd like to like them, men who inspire those feelings in others, and thus dont HAVE to settle down. Most of us men would be plenty happy in the constraints of monogamy, but women arent really objective and scientific when thinking about us.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 05:56 AM
1

Burka laws? I thought for sure I heard there was some typical Muslim clothing not allowed in public or at least at public schools?
/r/MensRights05/12/22 10:00 PM
2

I think France has some sort of no-hijab law, not sure the extent of it. So one might fight for womens rights to wear them.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:58 AM
0

I would appreciate an ellaboration
/r/MensRights25/11/22 12:21 AM
1

not sure if DOWNVOTING is appropriate....if you DONT LIKE the content of a post, you dont down vote it, thats supposed to be for factually in correct.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 12:20 AM
1

How can we see a list of such subs?
/r/MensRights21/11/22 11:48 PM
2

Im not scared, just cautiously prudent
/r/MensRights21/11/22 11:43 PM
-9

Most categories have some sort of privilege. Women get meals bought for them, men get to walk at night in more neighborhoods, milennials get to be good at using phones, boomers get to have savings.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 08:40 PM
-1

Whoever asks for the date pays, thats pretty simple and obvious I thought
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:19 PM
-10

Might be time for another one of those Northern liberation efforts, one a' dem "Yankee doodles", as the Southerners call them
/r/MensRights14/11/22 05:19 AM
2

By definition, all gender is meaning its all good, anyone can go, at least any human
/r/MensRights06/11/22 11:05 PM
2

I dont know how true your first point is, actually. I have heard enough women say, whoever asks for the date, pays. Of course, men are the vast majority the ones asking out the ladies, but thats on us
/r/MensRights03/11/22 02:24 AM
-1

Who knows what the future will bring, but as of now, incels are FAR less violent towards women then sex-getting men, on average. Domestic abuse, that is, abuse by a romantic partner, is overwhelmingly more frequent then rape outside such a relationship, then terorist attacks, then anything, unless we are counting every micro-agression, as real of an issue as those are. Incels have the least chance to be violent even if they wanted to, unless they were going to go do something that would almost c…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 03:16 AM
3

WHile a given news piece from Fox News, Breitbart, and the Federalist might be good, I wont read or watch them to find out. While I agree with some conservative sensibilities, the current GOP and such news sources are rotten at the core.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 12:21 PM
1

Thehill, ugh
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:25 AM
-1

Plenty, I think the majority of their claims and issues have real legitimacy. But, the average take in the west, or at least the more well to do western countries, has skewed to a point where it isn’t really thinking rationally. right to vote. Really every adult citizen, save perhaps for some convicts, should get a vote right to own property. right to work/study right to make ones own decisions about their romantic/sex life. He’s for this to really hip;en if they aren’t economics;;y liberated, o…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:49 PM
1

Thats some fuel, but incels are hated just for existing, for being, before they DO anything.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:01 PM
4

A damn shame......he brought some much needed attitude to that struggling show. I loved how he was totally in my face
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:43 PM
1

Human values aren't necessarily rational. "Excess" males make people uncomfortable for reasons that make sense from an evolutionary psychology point of view, but the "reasons" people convince themselves of, for why they feel that way, are convoluted, to keep cognitive dissonance lower.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:25 AM
0

I doubt if most incels HATE women
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:57 AM
0

I dont know the issue in detail, but ive HEARD that in at least some countries that tried legalization it became "basically a gift for pimps". Not sure why that would be, why it wouldnt end up like any industry, where its pretty hard to straight up enslave people.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:16 PM
-6

How do planes not have a camera per row? Given how problematic it is if someone decides to do something foolish, be it smoke, go on a tirade, etc
/r/MensRights05/09/22 05:32 PM
1

its small, it isnt very small. Plenty of people lie about their sexual status and history
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:58 PM
3

we have drones and smart phone hacks, we dont need self reporting about these things anymore. Bring on the accurate sociological studies revolution!!
/r/MensRights26/08/22 05:32 AM
-15

less worthy to receive sex, yes, if thats what the potential sex partners feel (which they do). And unfortunately, society at large doesnt want to reward perceived lower status men plenty of things, even if it seems based on the direct merit, they should. People dont want to laugh at funny jokes by percieved lower status men. Are such men less worthy of being laughed with? well..... i mean, no, not less worthy...but, every one has to make their own call what they will laugh at, or more specifica…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:54 AM
1

Theres one where it looks like they are about to poor a cauldrin of scalding liquid on christmas carolers
/r/MensRights19/08/22 08:28 AM
4

They throw babies off roofs and drop guilitiones on them. They are spit roasting camp counselers. Gomez purposely golfs towards his neighbors windows. Its a comedy, I love Addams Family Values, but some peoples interpretations about the Addams are a bit off. They do seem like geniunely fucked up folk, not just dark sense of humor people.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 08:22 AM
5

You can feel sorry for suffering caused by ones own foolishness, absolutely
/r/MensRights16/08/22 10:29 AM
3

I agree that such a thing deserves its own word, and rape was that word throughout history, so I think it should be kept. But, we as a society arent doing the important work of clarifying these things, so people are using it in conversation but without making sure we are talking about the same phenomenon. Sexual assault of all sorts is worth talking about, and rape in the stricter sense is also worth talking about on its own terms.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 10:28 AM
1

My main issue with this is, for the most part, we teach what IS. Here are historical facts, heres some equation that describes/governs some physics, etc. We can create conditions that make people care about each other more. And technically, people are happier when they care, so there is technically a way to teach people to be better to each other..... Rapists are often in denial about HOW much suffering being a rape victim causes. So im not fully against teaching boys/men not to rape. But....peo…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 10:25 AM
1

Individuals from any category can be oppressed in some way, and any category can be categorically oppressed in some way, including extreme elites.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:54 PM
23

you cant make that clear, its just outside the realm of what can be clarified. You just cant convince women of that, even if you were gay, as plenty of gay guys are bi, and even if you are in a relationship, as plenty of guys cheat.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 08:10 PM
2

Not even just those who CRITICIZE women....Ive been called it multiple times on reddit in response just to me explaining sexual dynamics in humans, and their relevance to other issues, stated with no value attached.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:54 PM
1

What some people are missing, is the concept....someone unable to get laid....is always going to be an insult. People act like this one term just happened to get usurped to just be a general insult. But any term that means this, is going to end up as such.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:52 PM
-1

I think the equivalent is women thinking they dont need something explained to them, as in, their level of understanding is comprehensive enough as is. Its of course, a problem that plenty of men have as well, and a problem not all women have, but there seems to be something of a pattern, both of men mansplaining to women that dont need to have it, as well as women feeling like they are being "mansplained" to, but its a justified legitly needed explaination.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:33 AM
0

Punch and Judy, the only example I can think of. But, its also the only example of comedy from a few hundred year era that I can think of at all.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 04:07 AM
1

plenty of people dont like big asses. I personally adore them, butt to each their own
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:11 PM
1

Im no historian. It would seem to me that there have been plenty of societies (if not technically "civilizations") where women on average have it worse. I'd think much of the Muslim world, for example. They arent all so constantly at war that their men are dying at such high rates to counter-balance the total lack of economic viability or political influence, or lack of sexual rights.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 09:47 PM
3

i wouldnt mind the ad in isolation, seen in itself, if it wasnt part of a pretty clear pattern (if one isnt invested in beleiving the opposite).
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:58 AM
1

Well, I never thought of the mens category as really a mens category, but of an open category that women were just never able to compete in. A woman NFL kicker, huh? NEver thought theyd have the strength to compete, plus its nice to have an extra tackler on defense.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 09:38 PM
1

If you are referring to NCAA which has laws requiring money for both, thats a good point, and i dont know what the right solution is. Id think its money spent on rec. leagues in addition to true competitive leagues.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 09:16 PM
-2

transwomen at the local rec league is one thing, in pro sports is entirely different. I cant just self-identify as under-12, and compete in track and field or soccer. I cant self-identify as Icelandic and try out for their national team in something. I cant self-identify my legs as arms and pick the ball up in soccer. AS for bathrooms, well, I dont personally have an issue with any kind of person int he bathroom with me, but Im a man, i dont really just feel vulnerable all the time. Many women r…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:35 AM
2

Ive been thinking of gender as "how one thinks of themselves regarding sexual status". So things like asexuals, uniks, sexually frustrated, male but wish they were female, gay, bi, these would be their own gender. This way of thinking sort of includes orientation in it but isnt exactly the same. I know this isnt how many think of gender, but im not getting how they do.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 06:17 PM
-2

depends on context. There are social dynamics that are best understood in terms of adult males and sexually "mature" females.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 04:29 PM
1

I only use it if i am implying the category that includes girls and women, and if i dont think that is clear fromt he context, than I clarify. And yet i still get downvoted to oblivion.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 04:28 PM
-1

it doesnt, it just needs to be included in what gets legally counted as sexual assault, and maybe be given its own sub-legal consequence.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 05:11 PM
-1

I dont think we need to re-define rape, just have tough consequences for clear criminal behavior, of which forced sexual acts is undoubtly so.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:54 PM
4

To clarify for those who might be coming at this with some bias or baggage, I'd specify "50/50 custody by default", which is NOT the case currently, not even close. Of course if theres some legit reason for assymetric custody, then the courts should be in their right to grant such.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:53 PM
4

Id argue theres at least a slim grey area where it isnt a "direct" threat, like for example, if my friend at a crowded movie theater tells me he's going to yell fire, and then stands up and goes "F-!!!" before I punch him in the gut, knocking the wind out of him, and preventing him from finishing his dangerous false warning.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:50 PM
1

plenty of people on here are too angry in their tone, and plenty of people on here have some extreme views. So it is understandable that even people that have checked this sub still have biased views about the issues at hand. i think we should have a side-bar of frequent issues to help clarify.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:44 PM
2

Talking about societal ideals turns out to be a tricky non-trivial pursuit. What I will at least say is, for the most part, societies dont really attack issues from a grounded philosophical standpoint. The founding fathers in large part did a better job than most in history, and America has lots of prudent checks and balances put into place, but we arent really rational when discussing systematic change. With mensrights, we see our society sort of deciding to just be gyno-centric in a lot of way…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:42 PM
1

If "SLUT" means "no regard for consequences of sexual activity", then yeah, that deserves shaming. Spreading STDs, cheating, lying, these are bad things to do, and should get called out. Now merely being promiscuous, that doesnt deserve shaming. Still, for sure, people should be free to reject anyone they want as a romantic or sexual partner, promiscuity included.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 03:19 AM
0

well im not refering to socialization specifically, as per the comment i was responding to
/r/MensRights05/02/22 08:22 AM
12

nah, you dont need to be unhappy with something to enact a change upon it.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 08:22 AM
0

what you say isnt contradicting the person you are responding to. Factors/conditions are what make up the universe, even our choices. If conditions were such that i was born a female, id probably like men, but conditions were such that im male, so most likely im to like women. But, its all just conditions, if they were right id be a gay man, or die in the whomb, or anything, its all the factors.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 07:57 AM
2

so not true. The sign is if they jsut have random tatoos that dont vibe with each other, like a wall with graffiti by different artists with no consideration for how the wall as a whole looks. Thats a bad sign!
/r/MensRights05/02/22 07:55 AM
-1

id say more so is that its not still the nature of things, as opposed to a myth. Its real enough in some places in the world, and was the case in America and Europe for a good amount of time.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 09:43 AM
1

its a thing in war-lord regions of the world, and i suppose with certain gangs, and likely enough some frat houses. Its certainly not somehow ubiquitous though, its not the norm.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 09:42 AM
-77

Its a tricky one....I dont like the idea of society coercing women to form monogamous relationships....if theyd rather share high status males then have a man to themselves, Id rather they have that right, so long as they arent cheating and lying. A lot of women just dont want the lower status men to themselves, so in that respect, yes, many men, more and more as time goes on in this era, dont "deserve" their women. Unfortunately, you are right, even if ideally we wish to preserve this right for…
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:25 AM
1

If this sub wants to keep its content to specific issues, that is its perogative. But is there a sub that reddit hasnt banned that talks more generally about mens issues, including "rights" int he more general sense, then in just the legal sense? I got halway through the original post before it blocked, and was interested in finishing it and posts like it
/r/MensRights04/01/22 12:21 AM
6

Theres an argument that getting what we want isnt always what makes us happy, for example, the sort of hard drugs that tear one apart (meth, heroin). By conventional thinking, I'd say, low status/unattractive men are the biggest losers. Some of them are devastated by the combination of exclusion from the dating pool, and how many people treat them differently as a defacto result. Sure, some women are hit hard by the realities of the bonding issue and all that, but most have a sort of balance of …
/r/MensRights29/12/21 08:18 AM
6

Most men on here are so because of their custody issues, am I right? If so, then this sub is very much NOT inherently an incel group, though incel issues or almost exclusively men’s issues, some of which do have to do with rights. Do incel not deserve rights? Do redpoll issuess and perspectives not deserve to be discussed?
/r/MensRights22/12/21 10:46 AM
1

I don’t remember where exactly i saw it, I believe in the old MGTOW sub….that politicians from both parties, over several decades at this point, have been unable to resist caving to the special interest group that is women and their point of view. If this is true, that legislatures and judges of both parties, in regions across America have given preference to women all other things being equal, then this is a true blight on our system.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 03:06 AM
3

rape certainly isnt not about sex....there hundreds of ways to demonstrate power.....further, overwhelmingly, the victims of (traditionally defined rape as forced penetration) are young women. So anyone who says rape isnt about sex is just naive about evolutionary psychology.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 05:57 PM
2

What I want to know is HOW prominent/common is it? Because if its merely fairly common, sure I’d like the media to cover it more, but i wont hold it TOO much against them. But if its rampantly everywhere, then yes they absolutely need to mention it more. Women’s rights issue is totally ubiquitous there though, every women in the whole country is under the thumb of societies rules limiting them.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:07 AM
0

There’s also the issue of “teaching” people to do/not do what We want them to do/not do. We can teach them that women in fact do NOT like sex “no matter what” the way men do (an exaggeration i know, but men are often flabbergasted at how different women’s sexuality is). In an appeal to their compassion. Enough men, it seems, simply aren’t realistic about what women want, and how much suffering rape causes them. And we can teach them about the consequences of rape to themselves, but that really d…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 05:24 PM
-1

I agree whole heartedly, except I’d caution this group against using the general term “FEMINIST” in place of what should be something more specific, like “MODERN MAINSTREAM FEMINIST”. Feminism was a real called for movement, getting women the right to own property, vote work, divorce abusive husbands. That sort of feminism is still needed in much of the world. What we are arguing against in MENSRIGHTS is the unhinged unequal spoiled brand of feminism that gives women more then even just benefit …
/r/MensRights11/09/21 06:17 PM
1

Is there a technically feasible way to film said act, and have it stream to some third party, without either sexually involved party getting to keep a recording for themselves? Like, a video camera designed by a company with a cloud, and some tamper sensing tech to discourage attempting to route the video stream to other recording locations? Or maybe it could have cameras in all directions, so you couldn’t tamper without it seeing you doing it? This way, the woman can feel secure that the man is…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 07:07 PM
2

Well, you CAN, but you MAY not. And THATS why i was never allowed to go to the bathroom during English class
/r/MensRights10/09/21 07:01 PM
1

The internet plays its part, for sure, but be careful not to give it TOO much credit. Other large contributing factors include the ratio of potential offspring between men and women, that being, men can, theoretically, given enough interest from enough women, have thousands of offspring in their life. Women can most realistically have 10 or fewer, the exceptions being ultra rare. Evolution selects for females in most species to simply care about genetic fitness, and thus, most of the women very …
/r/MensRights04/09/21 10:47 PM
2

one question i have regarding this practice, is, how widespread is it? As in, is this the life of MOST boys in Afghanistan?
/r/MensRights23/08/21 03:28 PM
1

would you elaborate?
/r/MensRights23/08/21 03:25 PM
3

this puts the thing in context, such that it really isnt mensrights worthy post, then, right? I didnt read the article, but that would seem to imply such to me.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:30 AM
2

BUT, it was somewhat true in the ancestral environment. The implication being, women often feel very shitty about life and themselves for a long time after, for reasons that evolution selects for, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:11 AM
-2

Im sure you know the meta of reddit much better then me, being a MOD in a group who is in somes sights. I would guess that, this sub being newer, has much to do with it. Given that MGTOW2 was also banned, which, to be fair, had plenty of problematic people agreeing with each others problematic opinions and misinformation, moreso than this sub....but it was SOO much less problematic of a sub then the original MGTOW....I really wouldnt be surprised if this sub goes, even if the general tone stays …
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:06 AM
2

$20!?!?!? for attractive women?
/r/MGTOW201/08/21 09:38 PM
1

not quite 100%. Money, pre-selection, actual regular behavior, these do all play a role. BUT, looks play WAY more of a role then most people are admitting. Also, people arent admitting how strong of an INDIRECT role it plays in who they like/dislike, as in, young men dont want to be friends with ugly guys, for indirect reasons.
/r/MGTOW01/08/21 09:02 PM
1

creepiness is not defined specifically by what one DOES. What one IS is plenty sufficient to be creepy, by definition. This is unfortuante, and frankly, women are doing themselves a diservice by having no possible sense of shame or self-reflection about their knee-jerk reactions/feelings. But strictly in terms of weather or not some of us are creeps, despite the lack of creepy BEHAVIOR, the answers yes. Some of our very existence serves to creep them out.
/r/MGTOW01/08/21 08:58 PM
2

Ill say this for sure, my attitude seems jaded to people, though its not. Im realistic, i dont like to fool myself, and in some ways to some degree, it is realistic to be pessimistic. And no, im not bringing up MGTOW, just generally.
/r/MGTOW201/08/21 05:02 PM
2

Cant say i know the extent of whats happening on their sub...but i strongly suspect they are including very valid analysis in their ban. EDIT: that is to say, they are banning valid analysis, not that their ban is based on valid analysis.
/r/MGTOW28/07/21 08:17 PM
2

They absolutely do NOT deserve more money. But to be fair with regards to their loss, Sweden really is a great team, they play way better then their small population would seem capable of. They make it deep in competitions regularly. Its not just the womens side either, though moreso there. The men do very well considering.
/r/MGTOW22/07/21 12:59 PM
2

yeah, it really is hard to be truly objective. To NOT miss relevant data points is a non-trivial task. it took humans FOREVER to start getting real physics and chemistry, longer to be truly scientific about sociology. And while we all benefit from this stuff, most of us arent really objective about most stuff. WOmen are pre-disposed to just not take most men into account. Its unfortunate that naive narratives dominate. Unfortunately, our attempts at educating people get met with angry tyrads.
/r/MGTOW21/07/21 05:26 AM
6

Star Wars had problems related to leftism, but its REAL issues were elsewhere
/r/MGTOW20/07/21 04:26 PM
4

at least some truth to it, but why THIS sub?
/r/MGTOW20/07/21 04:25 PM
1

Do we have a list of subs that will ban for inclusion in this sub? seems like every sub should keep track of that info, with respect to their own sub.
/r/MGTOW20/07/21 04:24 PM
1

It did until fairly recently. Cultural lag is a real thing. The conditions where there for women to not value Male Parental Investment, and therefore, men with material well being and the skills to gain said well being. But the lag is real. Stupid PUA stuff definitely worked, astonishingly well, the stories about the ugly old guys that just know what works and are willing to do it are real. Negging, numbers, peacocking, prolonged eye contact, kino escalation, chick-crack (astrology n stuff) that…
/r/seduction20/07/21 04:22 PM
1

Lose? probably nothing. But some of us would rather not risk ruining their day.
/r/seduction20/07/21 04:15 PM
1

well, you have to flaunt the wealth of course....pull up to the beach from the water in a yhaht, or one of those water-shooting hover jet bakpacks. LIkely enough to help with the ladies. or pay three beautiful hot women to accompany to the beach, the show of pre-selection, misleading or not, will help as well. Money, while not THE key to almost anything, is clearly VERy useful in just about every venture.
/r/seduction20/07/21 04:11 PM
1

Wait, so it shows up on feed, i can read the comments.....but not see the original post?
/r/seduction20/07/21 04:04 PM
9

every evolved being has genetic predispositions, EVERY one. No reason that somehow the difference between the sexes in our species is the one exception. A more general principal is that all phenomenon are in a constant inter-relationship, so really, everything is climate to everything else, everything is climate and behavior. But going being conjecture based on theory....the evidence is EVERYwhere. Men across the board are more interested in multiple sex partners, whereas women really rarely hav…
/r/MGTOW220/07/21 06:07 AM
-3

well, i wasnt arguing against all that, thought i made that clear. Anyway, this site seems to say we are both right: that is to say, by LEGAL definition of the term (what the term means) changes state by state, though, according this THIS source, at least, MOST states are not using the term as being toted in this thread. https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/sex-crimes/statutory-rape-charges-punishment-defense Just in case its not clear to those reading, im not making …
/r/MensRights18/07/21 01:01 AM
3

17 in NY, at least was the case 15 years ago, but i get what you are saying
/r/MensRights18/07/21 12:52 AM
-5

well, by the defintion that is used outside of, perhaps, the legal definition (waiting on replies for that ) ....yes, that would be something like a strap-on being used on an orifice, or fingers. Can be done, perhaps often is, i dont know. Im tyring to make the distinction between sexual assualt as a general category vs specifics being conflated. Not excusing this or making allowances for that.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 12:51 AM
-19

am asking a legal sub about their definitions.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 11:49 PM
-21

well, its totally a culture thing, the vast majority of people with Jewish genetics arent like that, of course. Most Jewish people in the area are VOCALLY against this sub-community being referred, you can look it up, they make the news all the time, the town of RAMAPO. Its just an example that really illustrates the issue being discussed.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 11:48 PM
-10

This subreddit shouldnt be downvoting this. Technical distinctions in terminology is important. But saying it isnt rape, its not like im condoning it.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 11:24 PM
2

of all subreddits to ban such a suggestion.
/r/MGTOW17/07/21 11:18 PM
-42

And i agree with that reasoning, but it does raise a tricky question considering extremely poor and disabled people. As of now, our society is pretty ok with all except institutionalized mentally disabled people being legally allowed to reproduce, even in copious numbers, and then even being given welfare. In fact we have whole communities, such as the orthodox Jews across the river from me in NY, where they dont even learn anything of economic value in their private schools, they all have huge …
/r/MensRights17/07/21 10:52 PM
-54

sexual assault of some sort, yes, illegal yes, but not technically rape
/r/MensRights17/07/21 10:47 PM
-14

While i think we should limit the use of the word "rape" to meaning "being nonconsensually penetrated in an orifice" as opposed to "nonconsnsually used TO penetrate....", if its going to be considered assault and be illegal, then how the hell is this rullin acceptable!?!?
/r/MensRights17/07/21 10:46 PM
5

well, i dont think thats whats causing it, i think its just a result of the dynamic that has arisen out of the combination of womens economic liberation, and governments pandering to special interests, in this case, womens issues. Conditions are such that women just dont need most men, but men are still desperate, so we have simping and cucking. Adult males telling younger males to watch out for this, if this is the sort of leadership you are thinking, would probably only really convince a few t…
/r/MGTOW16/07/21 12:14 PM
-1

well...come one, THE biggest pushers? You have huge networks of trafficking, whole countries known for this stuff. Pretty much any large organization is probably run by men. I dont doubt too many post wall women are down with having their duaghters be part of the deal, but i bet that doesnt come close to the total numbers.
/r/MGTOW08/07/21 08:35 PM
-7

boys, yeah, at least the majority. Men? I certainly havnt been assaulted as an adult, outside of a martial arts class
/r/MensRights02/07/21 06:34 PM
1

now i wonder, in the specific context of the time between being out and going back home, are men less safe? As in, the increased numbers of men that get murdered or attached, does it apply in the same situation, or is it about what many men are otherwise doing? Enough men are in or deal with gangs and career criminals, violence stemming from that wouldnt exactly be a parralell, though to be fair, plenty of men and boys are sort of forced to have to deal with those situations. My guess would be p…
/r/MensRights02/07/21 06:33 PM
1

not sure ive observed that. COuld you elaborate?
/r/MGTOW224/06/21 02:48 AM
8

Recruit, what a crazy thought. Im sure SOMEONE on here does, but the vast majority would never think of it. The shit I would get for TELLING people about MGTOW would be crazy.
/r/MGTOW207/06/21 09:11 PM
2

There are many ways to cheat on someone. If two people promise each other they will both stick to a diet, and one cheats the diet, they are cheating the promise, and thus cheating the other person. If two romantic lovers never make a commitment to monoagamy, then sex with others isnt cheating. If they outright ask for, and then get an agreement for open relationships? heck, youd practically be cheating NOT to find someone to have sex with, what with the imbalance it would create, and thus the po…
/r/MGTOW207/06/21 09:08 PM
6

Femsplaining IS a thing. Over at twoxchromosomes, they are insisting that any man that respects women will get a girl friend (if they so desire). They dont want to hear explanations of sex preferences, evolutionary logic, etc. They just want to explain to men that we are creeps.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 10:10 AM
2

What I'd like specifically is the ability for software to understand the staff, and give me some sort of scrolling ability, something that gives me some reading ahead at the page turn, so i dont need two pages on the screen at once, not simply the foot switch. Though i dont per se need musescore style scrolling, something between regular pdf view and that scroll i think would suit me best. Id imagine we are at a place where software can see the page well enough to give me that, with the ability …
/r/seduction11/05/21 11:18 PM
1

getting women and "getting" women are at least somewhat different things <;) no, but its a shit test if theres a right response. Some men and women are sonot meant for each other that theres no right way for the man to respond to the rejection. Usually, this isnt a "chemistry" issue so much as the assymetry of the dating/mating dynamic.
/r/seduction04/05/21 02:31 AM
2

Ive ruined womens whole days by implying she wasnt wayyy out of my league (by sorta kinda hitting on her). Women talk to their girlfriends about their grudges and slights, perceived or otherwise.
/r/seduction04/05/21 01:41 AM
3

Far simpler, theyd just have to be willing to have a lower status boyfriend. For everyone like us that is skeptical of relationships, there are PLENTY that are pining for it, even with these "femcels", which by your description, should really be a different term, as they aren CELibate, they are just relationshipless.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 07:46 PM
3

The reason i dont stop using the term "Incel", even though it has become a slur, is because the idea is perennially an object of disdain, so whatEVER term we use for them, will become a slur. Its not like the N word, where it was originally a word of disdain. Incel was the regular technical term but a few years ago. Use a new technical term, its a slur in 3 years. Glad to see r/MGTOW2 being willing to talk honestly about inceldom. Most comment threads about incels go down the usual naive directi…
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 07:45 PM
4

So much of todays culture is latching on an issue, but every situation, every interaction, has multiple causes, and multiple effects. While it is certainly true that women had fewer freedoms, and were thus subject to oppression, until fairly recently here in America, and still today in much of the world, it would be foolish to think that women wont take advantage of rules/culture that gives them the oppurtunity to. Similar to what haapened in I think it was Liberia, where African American immigr…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:29 AM
2

IM not against such laws, IF....and its a big if.....they then have the other supplementary laws that make it not a gender lopsided dynamic. If they are trying to protect their view of the family, and the governments role therein, thats largely their right as a state i suppose, but if its JUST going to be these sorts of laws that go one direction, then big time no no.
/r/MGTOW06/04/21 03:47 AM
-2

How is it clearly so if no country overall believes this? keeping in mind all countries are NOT in on it, there is just too much global animosity and outright hate between peoples.
/r/MGTOW03/04/21 07:34 AM
30

Theres more then one way to cheat on a romantic relationship, I think this counts for most relationships, unless agreed upon ahead of time.
/r/MGTOW31/03/21 08:09 AM
2

While I could increase my v-ness with a better fitness regime, truth is, even when I was fairly fit (short of having a real weight lifting habit). My skeleton just never game me a V. I have something of a narrow shoulder build, as well as short of an excess of front core muscle, which I sort of like, I can stabilize a little bit easier, but with clothes on, and even shirtless, given I never had the fat level to have real core definition, my core never looked impressive. Combined with the narrow …
/r/seduction16/03/21 08:44 AM
1

I dont know what can be done about it, practically, but my main complaint about the other MGTOW sub is it seems to be getting trolled/brigaded etc. by im guessing Russia, with regards to things like Greta memes. Im all for discussing the poltiical theory related to MGTOW, and that includes of course questions of the liberal/conservative spectrum.
/r/MGTOW225/02/21 06:15 AM
-1

with regards to the claim that kids are whining about the problem as opposed to suggesting solutions, yes we accept that the young generation has a MAJOR issue with the older generation. Regarding specific suggestions, sure, we can dismiss those that arent appriate. but this whole line of reasoning is really what im getting at, how is this a MGTOW issue? Unless we are talking about not reproducing, which of course would aleviate pollution. Im so not a leftist, im fairly laize faire, except for t…
/r/MGTOW25/02/21 06:12 AM
0

guess all you want, im talking theory as it applies to greta. examples would be things like the uigyurs though. WOuld you apply such logic to them protesting?
/r/MGTOW25/02/21 06:07 AM
2

worded that way, of course, there are situations that that describes. But they arent exactly tatamount. Nagging your neighbor to kick their drug habit is one thing, nagging them to stop passing out on your lawn is another.
/r/MGTOW25/02/21 04:21 AM
-4

inconvenienting people HAS proven a certain type of effective. lOts of the bigger problems in life are best solved with a multi-pronged salvo.
/r/MGTOW25/02/21 03:29 AM
-14

also a generational thing. Kids arent supposed to make political policy, thats the solution that adults SHOULD be doing. But kids have every right to demand solutions to an issue that will effect them so greatly, and moreso then older generations. I really wish MGTOW would stop with the Greta memes, it reeks of manipulation
/r/MGTOW25/02/21 03:15 AM
-3

The illusion of high value IS high value. How often this sub, rightly so, states that the best attitude to get laid is to act like you know that she wants you sexually. doesnt matter if its already true, doesnt matter if you beleive it......the act makes it so. Its like bitcoin in a way.
/r/seduction16/02/21 09:33 AM
2

as a whole category, no, they dont like us, they are weary of us. But, the love that the elite man gets, imagine Brad Pitt, millions of dollars, acting skills, looks....they love men like that more then we love women, i think.
/r/MGTOW213/02/21 03:27 PM
1

they get dwarfed, as far as the statistics of average go. Im not making a hating rich white men post, but its relevant to the original topic. Bezos is what $250 billion now? buffet and gates are aroun $100 billion each. as a group, rich white men in america add up to so much more that it skews the whole average, and thus, average cant be used to understand whats happening with most people, its just a whole different scale.
/r/MensRights13/02/21 03:13 PM
1

yes, fortunatey, staticians have LOTS of tools at their disposal. Unfortunately, its not just the masses that jump to conclusions about statistics, even trained scientists are often assumptive about statistics.
/r/MensRights13/02/21 03:10 PM
3

I'd imagine the gap is more due to the fact that there are a few mega billionaire white men and not mega billionaire anything else, at least here in America. a very small number of outrageously rich individuals skews the average, even of a country with 300 plus million people, thats how rich the few are.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 07:04 PM
22

Opposite for me, I have good eyes, but a weak jaw, and an assymetrical nose.
/r/seduction02/02/21 11:22 PM
1

It’s. Not that we care about their opinion of us for opinions sake, but we don’t want to ruin some poor women’s day by approaching her for romantic purposes if we aren’t the right kind of guy.
/r/seduction29/01/21 10:05 PM
2

What we can say for sure, is Japanese women are fairly economically liberated, that is, financially self-sufficient. This will inevitably have some ripple effect throughout a culture. They may not have a vocal movement, but they have SOMETHING of a feminism. WOmen are allowed to not need to marry, therefore they are allowed (and take advantage) of being able to share the high status males and ignoring ones they dont care for.
/r/MGTOW226/01/21 08:27 PM
1

being too busy can explain HOW MUCH sex is being had by sexually active people. But how many people are simply going sexless really isnt.
/r/MGTOW226/01/21 08:23 PM
3

It seems to me tht Trump slowed down mask wearing and mandates inmany places at least. He wasnt seen wearing a mask for what 6 months? I bet theres at least some places that were influenced by that to not mandate mask wearing.
/r/MGTOW09/01/21 05:37 PM
6

I wouldnt put faith in any people or parties without checks and balance, that is ACTIVE checks and balance, not just the words and hopes thereof. I think this applies of course to politicians, but also for society and societal "contracts". If judges can just decide to remove fathers from childrens lives, give women alimony even when they make more then the men etc., this is NOT checks and balance. In such situations, we cant realistically expect women to make these sorts of sacrifices themselves…
/r/MGTOW09/01/21 05:28 PM
1

For some, women are attracted before any game is spot. For others, there is no initial attraction, but the game might create the attraction.
/r/seduction26/12/20 07:57 PM
2

its context. If one is happy doing what those with more status would want them to do, happy to be obediant, then they like that. I cant tell you how often my jokes just plain get interrupted in group social settings. Im not Mad TV level, but im funny, and im not trying to force it, certainly not dominating interactions. People are fighting for status, weather they know it or not. Sub conscious is more relevant then conscious. Just plain happy for no/all reasons does get under peoples skin.
/r/MGTOW223/12/20 06:32 PM
1

There is PLENTY of opportunity to take advantage/be taken advantaged of without said persons permission.
/r/seduction15/12/20 03:27 AM
-1

they "would" want it, IF they were poor enough to value male parental investment, AND if their society didnt just give them a mans child support without her having to give him any continuing sexual access. This was how it was for most of history, as well as our ancestral environment.
/r/MGTOW204/11/20 05:58 PM
1

I DEFINITELY dont think they are JUST AS CORRUPT. For the most part, I tend to think I'm more objective then most people, so if Im blind to the workings of American politics, I'd have to REALLY study it in depth to understand it, cause it seems to me to be obvious that the GOP not simply problematic, as the Dems are. McConnell? Devos? All the Executive pardons? Russia? Failure to close tax loop holes OR raise taxes on the super rich? FLAGRANT lies at such an unprecedented rate? Gerrymandering?
/r/MGTOW213/10/20 02:45 AM
3

I DEFINITELY dont think they are JUST AS CORRUPT. For the most part, I tend to think I'm more objective then most people, so if Im blind to the workings of American politics, I'd have to REALLY study it in depth to understand it, cause it seems to me to be obvious that the GOP not simply problematic, as the Dems are. McConnell? Devos? All the Executive pardons? Russia? Failure to close tax loop holes OR raise taxes on the super rich? FLAGRANT lies at such an unprecedented rate? Gerrymandering?
/r/MGTOW213/10/20 02:45 AM
7

There's plenty to dislike about the modern left, as well as the democractic party. BUT, i don't think they are rotten to the core.....whereas, I DO think the GOP is. That doesnt mean every individual member is, but as a group, effectively, they are. If they have to always vote lock step, and what they are voting for is degrading the integrity of the system of checks and balance, then they are effectively rotten to the core. For a long term I disliked the two party system much more then either pa…
/r/MGTOW213/10/20 02:03 AM
1

Mind games can help tip the balance. She might only be kind of into you, compared to the competition. Every bit counts. Sure there are those that are that initially attractive that other stuff doesn’t matter
/r/seduction24/09/20 04:51 PM
1

Woman also have difficulties with dating/sex, but they are mostly pretty different from ours. For example, many men have trouble getting any sexual access at all. Women just plain dont have this issue, but their reward system is wired differently with regards to their sex life, as in, even though they are getting it, they require more stringent conditions to be rewarded for it. Ill empathize with their situation, but i wont enable their views, they are usually in denial.
/r/MGTOW02/09/20 08:23 PM
14

Are you a prepubescent? If so, then I recommend you stay off the internet for a few years if this sort of thing offends you, cause chances are pretty high youll keep encountering such "fucked up" shit. If you are not prepube, then theres a chance your asexuality might be medically caused, in which case you should get it checked out. And if you just have an emotional knee-jerk reaction, as opposed to the more natural jerk reaction, then I recomend a therapist, the art of which has come a long way…
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 04:54 AM
2

WEll, sure, most billionares are men, so we could SORT of make this a mens rights issue, but really, thats a stretch. There are reasons that we shouldnt be too gung ho about taxing the super rich, but is that what this sub is about? Id MUCh rather talk about the poltics of why both parties have decided to just give in to rewarding women automatically in court regarding divorce and child custody/support, and other things like that.
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 04:05 AM
1

disrespectfully, but with what their subconscious consider plausible deniability
/r/MGTOW14/07/20 11:39 PM
1

theres a season 3!?!?
/r/MGTOW27/06/20 07:54 PM
2

whats this from?
/r/MGTOW26/06/20 04:55 AM
1

There's plenty wrong with how BLM is playing out, but isn't it grounded in an anti-police brutality stance? Whereas, feminism, while theoretically grounded in women having rights, has grown into a "how much can we get away with?" movement, BLM is still a new thing. Maybe I just havent been following closely enough, sure seems like a bad comparison to me.
/r/MGTOW16/06/20 05:12 AM
2

What saddens me is that there are these petite manicins, then these fat ones....wheres just the thick ones, the ones shaped like hip hop music video back up dancers?
/r/MGTOW11/05/20 11:42 PM
1

Thats not even why it has a bad wrap. It has a bad wrap because a) women dont want to beleive that that is how their attraction works and b) they dont like when less good-looking/pre-selected/socially capable men try to seduce them. In fact they hate it.
/r/seduction04/05/20 04:12 AM
8

The 'objectification of women" is a tricky issue. on the one hand, its true that for much of recorded history, most of the economy was dominated by mens work, things like plowing fields, going to war, mining. So womens only value, as far as society was concerned, was their sexuality/fertility. Now, women are largely fiscally self-suficient, so societies views have changed. The "interesting" thing to me, is, in modern society, I think women sexualy objectify themselves much more then society as a…
/r/MGTOW30/04/20 06:03 AM
4

they have pros and cons. ALl things considered, I'd say a lot of people lose a sort of inherent wisdom somewhere in their late teens and dont get it back.
/r/MGTOW23/04/20 11:29 AM
5

Much of what this sub recomends is a society where the government at least sort of acts like it did in America and Western Europe for much of the last several centuries, where the government played a role in marriage roles, as in it was a LEGAL contract, and the gov. stepped in. The alternative is either where society is going now, or some sort of families/corporations/gangs take matters into their own hands to protect the interests of those that have influence in them. The way the government is…
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 03:39 PM
1

as for MATING value, womens value is mostly tied to her looks. Other things can contribute, like being available, not smelling awful, but its mostly looks.
/r/seduction20/04/20 07:35 PM
2

Theres no easy or simple solution to large scale economic issues, unless and until we can maybe socialize a next-level automatic economy. Even though people dont really need much stuff, its hard to get people to produce enough of the essentials for everybody, unless they are being compensated, and it only takes so many people to produce the essentials. One thing that maybe COULD be done, is truly essential jobs, we all can train for, and rotate in and out of duty for, as in, you spend two months…
/r/MGTOW220/04/20 07:23 PM
1

different strategies work for different individuals, this is undeniable. Some species have their males split into different strategies so completely that it took scientists a long time to even identify that they were males of the same species, evolution made them look very different in addition to acting different. SOme males are obviously high status, (looks, pre-selection, money/job, personality) and their best strategy is to act like they know they are sexually appealing. Saying "you are pret…
/r/seduction13/04/20 04:00 PM
3

well, the obvious answer, i wish, (its not obvious to most of America!) is that, yeah, he probably enjoyed it, not knowing the details (there is FORCE rape of men by women, for example) but, that DOESNT make him legally liable!!! Its like yeah, if i watch a robbery happen, I might slightly get off watching it unfold. doesnt make me an accomplice!!
/r/MGTOW01/04/20 03:03 PM
1

She;s refering to children, and she's SUPPOSED to be right. But, unfortunately, we have gotten to a point where the collective impact of our species is detrimental to ourselves,but we are stuck in our patterns. SO, hearing the children so insistently and consistently decry our overall heading is something that our species needs, when normally we hope that adults are enough to handle our bearing.
/r/MGTOW01/04/20 07:02 AM
-15

Greta is a bad example
/r/MGTOW15/02/20 08:58 PM
3

How do I visit a quarantined sub? I was subscribed to it, it isnt showing up in my listed of subscribed subs, nor showing up when I search reppdit for mgtow
/r/MGTOW204/02/20 03:06 AM
1

Well, most of their counts arent publicly known. The thing is, we can basically assume all women in countries that give them the freedom to do so, do. So no individual woman feels any reason not to take advantage of this freedom, if no one will be aware of her count. So it isnt that her value goes down with every new partner, its that we assume the partners (typically rightly so) and so age is pretty much the corresponding factor that their value in this way goes down.
/r/MGTOW30/01/20 10:50 PM
2

Id argue that society prioritizes super rich men above anyone else. They end up influencing the market in any way they want, including influencing politics, even in nefarious ways. They can reproduce with huge numbers of women (or just have sexual relations if they dont want the offspring). Sure, rich woman can do those things, but there arent really many of them at the SUPER rich level....and also, sex with many partners isnt quite the reward to them as it is to men, so someone non-issue. Rich …
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 10:01 PM
8

WEll...its that they arent attracted to men with no TACT.....as in, they arent totally obviously scumy, like they dont kick puppies in public, or berate the waiter. But, in truth, women arent really finding men sexy or not based on how genuinely nice or compassionate they are. Their ability to form social connections, yes, and the extent of their social connections. Not saying they NUMBER of connections they have, but a combination of number and with who, and the strength of the relevant connect…
/r/seduction24/01/20 08:01 PM
1

Most peoples beliefs about pyschology are woefully misguided. While most of it is IN SOME WAY RELEVANT, without an evolutionary logic base, you cant do much with your other pyschological insights, they are just pieces of the puzzle. Evolutionary logic is having the picture on the box. I could probbaly come up with a better analogy. The point being, sure, healthy families TEND to make healthier offspring, things like confidence TEND to attract people, but if it was just that easy, then evolution …
/r/MGTOW223/01/20 02:11 PM
1

Curious what the specifics were. I've most certainly noticed how very vocal they right wing presence there is, but if they are banning you from calling it out, that makes me think the mods are very much happy with that fact, or even fanning the flames perhaps. The worst example to me on there of it is the anti-Greta stuff. Very naive to have a negative attitude of her.
/r/MGTOW219/01/20 06:55 AM
2

I have trouble with alcohol taking away ones legal right to consent. People knwo what alcohol does. If they want, they can drink alone at home. If you drink socially, and especially if you drink excessively....you know what alcohol does!!! I see it as much a purposeful attempt to lower ones inhibitions. Now, that doesnt mean they are doing it SPECIFICALLY for sexual inhibition purposes, but thats the thing about lowering your inhibitions, you dont know exactly how its going to efffect you, you d…
/r/MGTOW17/01/20 06:22 PM
0

its not moronic, its part of the process, a part that kids are allowed to partake in.
/r/MGTOW14/01/20 02:58 AM
13

whining is a genuine part of the stystem. The post is apt that women largely lack perspective, and whine no matter what, and generally cant really reason through problems/solutions (at least complicated problems). As for Greta, well, the issue she is whining about is a problem of supreme importance, that the experts are getting ignored, despite elucidating what needs to be changed. So, in a very real way, what she's doing, showing that the next gen. which will inherit this world, and who cannot …
/r/MGTOW14/01/20 02:57 AM
0

I dont know the details well enough. Ive heard it said that law-makers and judges from liberal and conservative camps have been responsible. The idea being, its hard to "get away with" (from a re-electablilty stand point) being "against" womens rights, and not just the basic "right to vote and get a job" stuff, but all this stuff in the last 50 years of them slowly just plain gaining control with regards to at least child support and such.
/r/MGTOW21/12/19 11:59 AM
3

Species that reproduce asexually also have conflict. Conflict over food, with each other and other species, conflict over habitat, conflict with predators, conflict of course with humans, though they probably arent aware of it. Sexual dynamics end up having a role in just about everything for sexual species. Really, the very existence of us as men cant really even be concieved without the existence of females. So if there is conflict because of women, it means its also because of men, its becuas…
/r/MGTOW19/12/19 07:46 PM
1

If the republican party dies, then either the Dem party will split or a nother party will rise. Something fills the void, same as when we go our own way, plenty of men zoom in to shower the women with attention
/r/MGTOW19/12/19 07:12 PM
4

PLENTY of scenarios for civilization to be undone
/r/MGTOW09/12/19 03:27 AM
14

Yes, overwhelmingly, the rape drug is ALCOHOL. Women so often don't believe that they would be totally unconscious and unrousable from the amount of alcohol they intake. So they think, surely, they were slipped something, when in fact, it was just the alcohol.
/r/MGTOW08/12/19 08:36 AM
1

Well, you are DEFINITELY off to EVERY race. African American women do NOT age the same! Sure, theyll blowup with a bad diet and stagnant lifestyle, but as far as just the AGING process goes, pretty much across the board, women in the Americas with some African genetics age MUCH better then the rest. Fewer African American women lose their plateau quite as early, and many dont really hit a WALL until well past 40, honest.
/r/MGTOW01/12/19 07:47 AM
0

dont make MGTOW look bad. shes doing what needs to be done
/r/MGTOW01/12/19 06:50 AM
1

Europe will likely snap into some new attitude, they sort of have to. They cant rely on America, they are outright scared rightfully of Russia, and they are in a position to lead with regards to climate change. If this doesnt including limiting immigration, then it will have to mean a REAL effort to assimilate them better, and that will largely include forcing them to in some ways. America is going further into denial about just about everything. We are becoming less critical thinkers, more divi…
/r/MGTOW01/12/19 06:48 AM
2

yeah, but fashion modeling isnt as much about sex appeal, its largely about NOT distracting fromt he clothing. Most men like more curves and overall thickness and fleshiness then the vast majority of fashion models.
/r/MGTOW01/12/19 06:35 AM
2

then fuck you, Emily Lindin.
/r/MGTOW21/11/19 02:55 AM
33

Im just confused why she has a hollywood career.....In evertyhing ive seen her in, she is bland and forgettable.
/r/MGTOW16/11/19 11:48 PM
12

Even for STDs that arent transmitted through the ejaculation, even things that are out on the surface, are worse for women. The skin on the outside of the penis, while specialized, isnt as permeable as that of the inside of the orifices. Also, its much easier to wash OFF a penis then wash OUT a vagina. Vaginas are caves, things get stuck in them. Penises are like diving baords, jump on it, and most of the loose debris flies off. Weak analogies of course.
/r/MGTOW08/11/19 03:32 AM
7

Smart phones arent really going obsolete quickly, are they? I mean, theres not much smartphone software that WONT work on a 6, is there?
/r/MGTOW07/11/19 04:08 AM
0

Dont think Greta belongs in that list.
/r/MGTOW06/11/19 06:00 PM
1

right, but they are quite a bit more vulnerable as far as consequences
/r/MGTOW14/10/19 07:26 PM
2

yeah, once its law, im not fighting that judges should rule in opposition to the law
/r/MGTOW14/10/19 07:26 PM
-23

Im iffy on weather the law should be symmetrical here. Girls are vulnerable sexually, they can get pregnant. Boys want that sex, and what harm is there for them? well obviously, heart break and STDs, as there are with any human, but are underaged boys any more vulnerable then men in these ways? What boy ever feels exploited that gets to have consensual sex with an adult woman?
/r/MGTOW13/10/19 06:39 AM
5

oh man, bad example!!! apple picking is great, at least here in NY where we have delicious crispy apples
/r/MGTOW07/10/19 03:18 AM
1

Thier perogative. Womens instinct usually stops them from being bold, even wtih those they like. SHOULD is a tough question.....evolutionary logic has one sert of "priorities"....but those priorities arent for our subjective best wellbeing.
/r/seduction06/10/19 04:56 AM
7

To play devil's advocate...the vast majority of economists work under a very limited spectrum of assumptions. Short term gain is "the bottom line" to most of their work and thinking. Ecological time scales laugh at such strategy though, so, in a way, the experts have gotten really really good at fooling themselves about the nature of value. Solutions like Slats are great, and should be implemented. I dont think there is anything inherent in MGTOW that says that capitalist solutions are inherentl…
/r/MGTOW06/10/19 02:50 AM
1

hmmm, i wonder.....enough churches, hotel lobbies, restaurants, museums etc. are buying flowers every week....and i NEVER see a couple at a restaurant with what looks like flowers that they brought in themselves.....
/r/MGTOW27/09/19 02:03 PM
10

I'd say IF they exercise, 21 should usually be hotter then 18. I'd say 21-25....if they excerise....(which sadly not too many do)
/r/MGTOW19/09/19 07:08 PM
2

Just watched "Gaurdians of the Galaxy". The main character refers to himself as "not 100% a dick". This is how it is usually used, where being a dick is a bad thing. Pretty much used the same way as "cunt", though cunt seems to have more of a taboo as far as usage.
/r/MGTOW11/09/19 11:50 PM
1

Unfortunately, it looks like the conditions that led to most men having somewhat regular sexual access are changing, it is a new era. For the last few hundred years, at least in America and much of Europe, we had a major middle class happen. Regular folk could ply a trade, work a craft, invest, act as middle men, all sorts of things.....so men were thus able to provide male parental investment. Now, for several reasons, male parental investment is less desired by women. So women are only interes…
/r/seduction19/07/19 04:03 AM
8

The word "slut" has it's legitimate useage. Not simply to mean "promiscuous" but specifically for women who are irresponsible with regards to sexual consequences. Slut is a real concept, and there are many real sluts, and they should be shamed. STD's run rampant, girls lie and cheat, slut is a real thing, and we should be allowed to use the term.
/r/MGTOW28/06/19 08:07 PM
3

They are sort of in denial. Their conscious doesnt always get who and what they really are. This phenomenon is true for likely all brain carrying creatures. In humans, this issue is more relevant with regards to sexual matters on the female side.
/r/MGTOW28/06/19 06:26 PM
1

Really, for some of us at least, it goes beyond what we DO, and is merely that we ARE, men that is.
/r/MGTOW26/06/19 04:16 AM
9

I do not know if I am over or under estimating things… Suffice it to say, this is my personal take on things
/r/MGTOW09/06/19 04:54 AM
43

Women are not inherently evil… But, within the context of sexuality and romantic relationships, they have a specific nature, which, to say the least, is problematic.
/r/MGTOW09/06/19 04:51 AM
1

SHE asked for a date, as in....asked you out on a date? Like, she wanted an oppurtunity to get to know you? And you Agreed? I think the idea is, the person who accepted the date request is doing the person who asked a favor. They should pay the full bill within reason, as in, a coffee shop date means she should buy you a latte and i suppose one baked good. If she asked you out to dinner, she should get you dinner. Not sure how to contrive a situation where it works out to negative value, as in y…
/r/MGTOW06/06/19 03:18 AM
3

The 100% woman’s body equals woman’s choice is ridiculous. If it’s already a fetus, there’s already something beyond just their body going on. Plus, legally, men are expected to financially contribute to the offsprings well being. Woman are trying to have their cake and eat it to. Obviously no one wants to hear it, but short term pleasure had to be weighed against th big picture. Sex has consequences, Birth control pills have side effects....it’s not a simple matter, and women should have to be …
/r/MGTOW17/05/19 06:37 PM
0

Im NOT liberal. Mental illness, as in the fact that most things have some complexity to them, and we should have knee jerk reactions to them? Newsflash, the liberals are just as bad at that as the GOP loving side of the conservatives. The knee-jerk reaction to how women are would be to go sharia, take all their rights away. MGTOW is, i think we mostly agree, something a bit more balanced. Maybe i should clarify something. Im not saying parents should make the decision to go ahead for a sex reass…
/r/MGTOW07/04/19 06:00 PM
0

Im conservative overall, no two ways about it. Many of the arguments the left makes about transgender are plain crazy. That doesnt mean its a pure black and white issue. just like with opiates, do we want to outlaw them ALL together? there are only so many types of painkillers, and they dont all work in all situations, shouldnt hospitals have access to them? maybe not, but am i RETARDED for not wanting to make knee-jerk reactions to emotional issues?
/r/MGTOW06/04/19 06:26 AM
-12

How so? It's a nuanced issue, Im agreeing there should at least be some hoops to jump through, no rash decisions. Health is complicated, some people are born with wierd unfortunate situations. Sex differences is one of them, the majority of us are born with our parts fitting each other, and thus the system works, the nutrients flow, life is good. Others have cancer, deformities, missing some number of chromosomes.....among these oddities are people whos anatomy is somewhere inbetween, which is a…
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 09:28 PM
-17

NEVER!? its not always just a psychological preference, some of these peoples bodies are messed up, they were born some odd imbetween sex. Many of them are way unhealthy in a way that would be best fixed sending them one way or the other. I think there should be a legal process to have to go through for kids to transition, but it should be treated as it often is, a wierd but real medical issue that can be at least somewhat fixed/alleviated with modern technology.
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 08:37 PM
5

for the most part thats how we think of them, but some of these supermen versions, he could go find himself a diamond planet somehwere and bring home a 1,000 ton chunk.
/r/MGTOW03/04/19 10:41 PM
6

well, im not gonna go...
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 04:56 AM
6

it will probably still be at least entertaining. modern big budget comic movie....probbaly worth a viewing.
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 04:15 AM
2

Did the weight lifter win at a tournament bigger then just australia/new zealand?
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 04:04 AM
2

All men and All women are not in the same boat, as far as influence and power goes. Sure, the billionares are mostly men, the elected officials are mostly men, but the goverment has catered to women as a special interest for decades, which in many ways seems like a goodt hing, but its been too afraid to have any overarching principle to it. The result is, now, women as a group have legal power over men. So this STOP: really is inaccurate.
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 02:07 AM
9

If we look at the hunter gatherer times, women supplied most of the calories, men most of the protein. Women were valuable to others, their rights were respected. There werent dowries, fathers didnt see their daughters as burdens. WOmen were typically either in groups with each other, with their kids and the other mothers, or with their man. Men couldnt really amass material goods, so we didnt have extreme social stratification....and since mal parental investment was so important, this pretty m…
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 11:29 PM
14

When she might not be realizing is, theres a trade off for her. If she is living in a society where a man will fight a man that has sex with his woman, then that probably also means she is under tabs often....woman in most societies in history had some limits in their ability to get away with cheating, they couldnt just go anywhere alone and have the community not know there whereabouts. A society that allows for woma to live their lives more freely tends to have police that are both protecting …
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 11:00 PM
3

Nothing is realistic in video games. You have ammo all over the floor, people healing from within a percentage of death to fully healed, double jumping, lasers, 400 pound dudes doing double backflips...Not sure why video games should have less attractive female bodies?
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 08:23 PM
6

I think evolutionary logic is too strong, those who are benfiting enough from womens current strategy are going to view it as worth it, at least in the moment.
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 04:57 AM
0

Unfortunately, some people are born with painful medical conditions. Enough of the differentiation process can go awry. Modern medical technology is able to help some such people find an increase in wellness by transitioning to some degree one way or the other. Sure, there are some issues society has to then deal with: bathrooms, prisons, and with children, sleepover decisions. The issue of transgender in sports, however......whats going on is just plain insane, the world is losing its mind
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 03:52 AM
2

1st AND 2nd, this shouldnt be dismissed as coincidence or something. Absolutely insane that they are competing against the girls
/r/MGTOW27/02/19 11:47 AM
0

I dont know this for sure, but my belief is that he won't/wouldnt rule strictly from his own ideals. He knows that American politics requires compromises, and that few in this country are really as left as he is. I do beleive he will try to plead his case often enough to congress and the people, but I dont think he would be too stubborn.
/r/MGTOW25/02/19 03:13 AM
1

they dont all have THEIR OWN boyfriend
/r/MGTOW09/02/19 05:18 AM
64

its almost a law pf physics, is so dependably true.
/r/seduction06/02/19 12:21 AM
-3

When people say AWALT, what that should mean is there is a base human nature in our DNA. Environmental cues can bring certain traits out, and others may remain hidden. To flip the tables, wha such traits are there for men? I've had oppurtunity to get away with rape, yet I didnt take up on it. So its not as easy as saying rape is an automatic yes for men if they can get away with it. Sadly, however, if i was rasied, say, in something like war-torn systematic rape as the status quo Congo, I'd almo…
/r/MGTOW03/02/19 12:46 PM
3

Evolution has put them in a tough spot. It has made them hornier when they can get pregnant. And it has made them fall in love with the baby once they see the baby. But now, between those times, we now have technology to interfere. Theres no complete solution. Birth control messes with momens moods, we are over-populated....so many things causing a clusterfuck. I personally hate that there are legal late term abortions. 1st trimester, well, I still dont consider it nothing, but i suppose its a w…
/r/MGTOW01/02/19 07:51 AM
-1

for me, the rest of the commercial has a sort of overarching cringe, because i know what the social context is. I can at least sort of agree with enough of the sepcific things happening or being said in the rest of the commerical. This scene, though, straight up got it wrong. He's just hitting on a girl. Shes walking fast, if she expresses disinterest and the guy continues, THEN his friend can cut in. Here, though, its just a completely wrong view on flirting, and the sexes roles therein. And i …
/r/MGTOW01/02/19 07:41 AM
10

I think supposedly though, human visual perception, if not just the eye itself, is possibly the most sophisticated or wayyy up there in the animal kingdom ​
/r/MGTOW31/01/19 05:02 PM
2

Can he abandon him because his musics on the lame side?
/r/MGTOW28/01/19 03:26 PM
5

"THATS not an American influenced culture.....THIS is an american influenced culture!" -Crocodile Dundee
/r/MGTOW28/01/19 09:06 AM
3

keep in mind the school floor is MUCH harder then a wrestling mat.
/r/MGTOW20/01/19 11:27 PM
0

theres sort of a low level sleeze to most human sexuality by default, at least for most people
/r/seduction20/01/19 07:15 AM
1

Its not a taught thing, wish people could understand this about so much of our attitudes and behavior. The social conditions are there, good luck countering that with indoctrination. Same with teaching boys to not turn into rapists. The conditions are there to deter them somewhat, but not enough to erradicate the problem. Its pretty hard to teach people to hold others well being as their own interest. Social conditions are what do or dont lead to this.
/r/MGTOW20/01/19 02:12 AM
2

Well, women cant handle as much weight per shoveling motion, but little kids, old people, and women can all help shovel. Have a small and light enough shovel, and shovel small portions at a time, and they contribute.
/r/MGTOW20/01/19 01:58 AM
14

I wouldnt go THAST far. What i WOULD say, is that women are more directly instinctive and less abstract. Mens resoning isnt SEPERATE from their feelings, they still have to be reasoning about their values. The difference is women have less need for abstract reasoning.
/r/MGTOW19/01/19 11:34 PM
1

Love me them big asses!
/r/MGTOW19/01/19 07:35 PM
2

if by lower their standards you mean be gay or have sex with your pet dog, then yes. a lot of us cant even get truly elderly ladies, they still have a sort of standards that excludes many of us.
/r/MGTOW11/01/19 07:16 AM
1

not literally the number one spot. For me personally Amy Poehler is a top tier comedian, though im not judging by stand up. Her work on the Wet Hot American summer prequels, her stuff on PandR, and oh man "They Came Together" was glorious. No one compares to Jim Carrey in my book, but thats of course personal.
/r/MGTOW27/12/18 08:38 PM
1

I'll bite this one. I find Kritin Schall herself pretty damn funny. i'd put Kristin Wiig and Amy Poehler pretty damn high on my list of fav comedians.
/r/MGTOW27/12/18 05:44 PM
3

The thing is, whats funny is based on context, and whats funny about the genders is largely different, of course there being plenty of overlap. An example, comedians talking about their sex lives, or their relationship to their significant others, its most definitely going to take a different form. Same with acting, so much of whats being acted is gender specific things. In music, its not just vocals that are diferent. Maybe in classical music theres not much of a gap in style and interrpretatio…
/r/MGTOW27/12/18 05:43 PM
3

sure, but I'd make a distinction between how interesting they are at first, versus potentially later, say, when naked and interested in sex
/r/seduction26/12/18 11:11 PM
0

relative to ones own attractiveness of course
/r/seduction26/12/18 11:00 PM
1

its powerful, but conditions can exist that make it not worth it.
/r/MGTOW18/12/18 09:22 PM
1

Amelie Manreesmo already did it (joking, she's just a very manly looking woman)
/r/MGTOW07/12/18 07:44 PM
3

I never once got a message on either POF or OKCUPID. I wasnt a regular visitor, and i think they delete messages after like a month, but i had it forwarding to my regular email, so im pretty sure i wasnt missing messages. this was over seomthing like 5 years of having accounts. Not ONE message on either site in 5 years. And me being athletic and musical, for whatever that is worth (apparently basically nothing in dating)
/r/MGTOW06/12/18 11:56 PM
2

I wonder about this. I would imagine parents would either have a garden fo some sort, or go out into the wilderness if not city residence. as far as I know, current one room residence people around the world dont have sex in front of their children.
/r/MGTOW04/12/18 11:42 PM
1

whats the worst that can happen is the key monkey wrench here. not everyone has the luxury of the worst that could happen not being that bad
/r/seduction01/12/18 07:28 PM
1

I think its largely due to how hard the tackles are. Pro men have a lot of momentum, they come in hot. If you have a planted foot, and someone tachles into that planted leg, with no where for it to go, that shit hurts. With the women, they just arent coming in so fast, less energy. Also maybe the women get the calls more consistently, so dont need to make a stint? Mens is an unfortunate situation with how much diving...and also how many non-calls...there are.
/r/MGTOW23/11/18 08:50 PM
6

Also womens tennis is pretty entertaining
/r/MGTOW23/11/18 05:42 AM
32

Im no expert. Ive heard that womens gynmastics, while obviously being usually a full rotation less per trick, does exhibit, at the highest level, a sort of grace in certain types of moves that men dont quite reach. Also, Women are suposedly better at the lightest weight/lowest kick firearms target competitions. Though that is hardly entertaining the way its done in olympics. I will say though, womens soccer is quite entertaining. Womens basketball kind of gets ruined by the way tall women move, …
/r/MGTOW23/11/18 04:01 AM
1

Grossly ignorant of her. In basically every society ever, the most fortunate are the high status males, women for the most part are in the middle, and then at the bottom are the lower status males, of course things like health changing the fortunes up. Now not all societies have systematically, formally oppressed men, or anyone for that matter, but theres always, at least with humans, some oppression going on, it may be subtle, but its always there, someone is oppressing someone.
/r/MGTOW20/11/18 10:34 AM
1

Interesting. The headline made me think for sure this was about sexiness in media, posters, movies, etc. That I would explain mostly in terms of availability of quality porn, people are watching it often enough, that of course the value of, say, titties in an R movie isnt as meaningful, people arent going to go see a movie in theaters because they heard some actress bares. This is a different issue, though.
/r/MGTOW20/11/18 05:47 AM
2

rocks dont have beliefs. We will always have some sort of beliefs. If you can word a question such that it has possible answers, people will believe some of the options as more likely then others.
/r/MGTOW20/11/18 05:39 AM
9

Desertification combined with over-population. No easy fix there.
/r/MGTOW08/11/18 10:38 PM
2

you REALLLLy dont know me, good friend. Kavanaugh is an interesting topic, one worth going further about, one relevant, for sure, to the important subject at hand, that of feminism, the GOP, and men going their own way. It most certainly has NOT only been democrats or liberals who have been spineless and short-sighted, giving in on womens issues without properly considering context and consequences. Plenty, PLENTY of judges, throughout the country, for decades, have one things like give women fu…
/r/MGTOW02/11/18 07:02 AM
8

Regardless how how we feel about the specifics of the supreme court proceedings, Kavanaugh is pretty much a party line judge. I really dont trust him to use JUDGEMENT, so much as to know what the partys sensibilities are. If you are all on board the current GOPs gameplan, then of course you'll be a fan of his. Im no fan of how the democratic party works, all the liberal stereotypes are fairly true to a larger extent then they want to admit, but we are allowed to see the real and relevent faults …
/r/MGTOW02/11/18 04:51 AM
2

Penis envy is a wierd concept.....it almost certainly doesnt happen the way Freud thought, nor does the Edipuss complex. Women and men have different sexual strategies from an evolutionary perpective. Men have the possibility of having LOTS of offspring, women almost gaurentee some. Evolution has selected that our sex ratios are damn close to 50/50, so we cant say one is clearly the better strategy, or evolution would select differently. So if women can be said to have penis envy, it would reall…
/r/MGTOW31/10/18 07:02 AM
1

i dont know starwars in an out like some people, but ive heard theories (from before the movie) that imply that the cumulative effect of thousands or more force users for millenia has shaped the galaxy a bit, at least such that force users are getting stronger. Whereas there are legendary jedi and sith from early history, even taking over the galaxy level abilities, the concetration of super powered beings in the Skywalker era is high. Yoda, Palpatine, Vader, Luke, are all legends-level, right? …
/r/MGTOW26/10/18 12:02 AM
2

poc?
/r/MGTOW25/10/18 11:49 PM
3

I do see downright hate here, but the basic theme of the sub is separate from that. The sub as a whole really shouldnt be banned from what Ive seen on here. I dont see calls for violence against women. Some calls for changes in how society is built, how our legal system works, things like that, as well as what we should be willing to put up with.
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 09:18 AM
1

Alcohol is, FAR AND AWAY, the rape drug. Learning to control how much one drinks is a very good life lesson to learn, but learning to handle drinking higher volume is a more difficult thing to do. Im a man, I dont feel personally unsafe of course, just taking the oppurtunity to educate regarding the whole phenomenon of slipping things in drinks, which DOES HAPPEN, and is worth taking precautions against, but really, when women are convinced they were slipped something, chances are high that they…
/r/seduction13/10/18 08:51 AM
1

favorites? i like some freer jazz, but havnt cheched him out yet
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 06:33 AM
0

Well, guess I shouldn’t have derailed the thread, sorry sub
/r/seduction12/10/18 09:58 PM
-44

Not trying to derail your post. You said you hadn’t drank alcohol at all, so it seems likely you got spiked. Overwhelmingly, the rape drug is....alcohol. Women don’t really realize or want to admit that they go comatose fom so few drinks. Yes, slipping things in drinks is a thing, be careful, but really, at least women, should be careful how much they drink,or at least what sort of situations could arise when they’ve had too much. Women aren’t on here too much, but pass it on to your lady friend…
/r/seduction12/10/18 07:59 PM
0

Certainly not forever though. Eventually evolution will catch up
/r/MGTOW11/10/18 08:36 AM
2

I make the distinction between believing them as a person on society/their community, versus the legal consequences of being FOUND guilty. No crime should be automatic guilt, for prison or governmental fines, regardless of the crime, there should be proof. Unfortunately, this means plenty of people get away with plenty of crimes. But people sort of forget that AMericas initial principles were informed by history. If you can just accuse people, then any business competitor can just move in on you…
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 09:21 PM
-3

With regards to the Kavanaugh situation, its not a criminal proceeding, Proof of the sort that courts and juries need isnt the standard. In general, I tend to believe accusers of sexual assault. Doesnt mean i think courts should automatically rule in their favor, but as a fellow member of their community, yeah, my belief will, usually, fall on the side of the woman. Yes, many false accusation happen, womans sexuality has a dark side, I'd hate to see criminal charges against accused without the s…
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 07:20 PM
2

Do we KNOW this sub is getting banned? Also, anyone have a good summary of Reddit’s more recent stance on banning subs?
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 06:08 PM
4

"grasseaters" is what they call men in japan who have given up on women or something
/r/MGTOW16/09/18 09:06 PM
5

The thing is, there are degrees of interest, and on top of that, different girls have different willingness to overtly advertise their interest then each other. So its yet another thing that is both simple and complicated.
/r/seduction03/05/18 11:21 PM
1

what you described ..."being careful who they let in their vagina" .....is not in itself flaking....but simple enough to combine that with the fact taht women want to gauge the potential of mates....like almost everything in the biological realm, these two opposites combine in a somewhat elegant, somewhat messy way, manifesting in, among other ways, combinations of things like actively flirting, attentively attempting to read and interpret flirtatious efforts, accepting or rejecting dates, decid…
/r/seduction05/03/18 05:22 PM
1

its their perogative to flake, im not mad or feeling negative about the fact, its their prerogative, heck, all things considered it favors me because it means they are flaking on lesser status males more often, and inevitably the overflow comes to the higher status males.
/r/seduction05/03/18 06:28 AM
2

concerning flaking on dates?
/r/seduction05/03/18 04:32 AM
0

yes, i know it sounds crazy
/r/seduction05/03/18 04:06 AM
3

as i spelled out, its not some totally unique situation, what in the realm of life is? trends shouldnt be dismissed, nor only viewed through cultural lenses. In general, this sub is more open to talk about evolution then most, as its relevance to the subject matter is paramount.
/r/seduction05/03/18 04:06 AM
2

crazy like a FOX <;) seriously, though, the context of our nature is pretty down crazy, it cetainly doesnt agree with our own sensibilities
/r/seduction05/03/18 03:35 AM
-6

While I agree that you dont need to forget completely about people that flake, i think theres more to women flaking on dates then "people" being moody or whathave you. WOmen are evolved to flake, its part of how they gauge what kind of men we are. Sure, anyone can flake on anyone at any given time, women will flake on each other occasionally, but women flake on dates ALOT, even with men they are semi-interested in.
/r/seduction04/03/18 11:03 PM
11

blunt, and true. Theres no WHY in the article, nothing about evolutionary psychology.
/r/seduction10/02/18 03:49 AM
0

Some men still act with the mischief around women, but the context has changed, and fewer men can get away with it as easily. Beofre, women wanted a mans male parental investment, and legal structures and rules were in place that pushed the poplation more towards monogamy, or at least towards most men having a wife. Now women have very little patience for a larger sector of the male population, and they now feel affronted just by that first blatant flirtatious step of many men. Their loss I'd sa…
/r/seduction22/11/17 05:32 PM
1

yes, but needs some qualification.
/r/seduction20/07/16 07:41 AM
2

Nobody? I assure you, different people sue different tactics and different levels of creepy influence. Sure, plenty of mothers saying "such and such, a good boy, what about him?" and plenty others are going further with it
/r/MensRights05/12/15 12:20 AM
1

indirectly at least, family, especially parents, try pretty hard to influence their daughters sex lives, consciously or subconsciously
/r/MensRights05/12/15 12:17 AM
1

are we looking at the same guy? EDIT: I may be wrong, but i tend to think most women respond more to the faces he makes and to his lame personality and sexual style then his base looks
/r/MensRights05/12/15 12:15 AM
1

Individuals, sure, cant connect to them all. What i mean is that as a category, I'm not really "getting" women, other than the relatively easy part, which is their romantic and sexual nature. I find them interesting for various reasons, but unless i flirt with them, they arent usually too interested in me as a person. Im not against flirting, but women are so frame dependant, it can be hard to detangle after the fact
/r/seduction21/07/15 10:19 PM
1

sort of success as in, romantic and sexual success, certainly, female friends in groups and circles, and even some genuine one on one friendships9 that exist regardless of the need for a group). But, my intuition, nor my experience/learnings, have helped me significantly connect to them the way i natureally can with guys. With girls, a large number of my jokes fall flat, where as with guys, basically everything i spew is eaten up. When guys start talking about themselves in terms of goals anddre…
/r/seduction21/07/15 10:16 PM
1

The main thing i look for is weather she can, IN GENERAL, be ok with things not going as planned, if the non-prefered outcome doesnt send her into a despair or funk. ROmance is, for women, very very strong, maybe the strongest thing. If they can't deal with life from a (truely) mature standpoint, its highly unlikely they can deal with romance, even one with a solid good-vibes guy like myself. In addition to this general mindset, eventually romance/dating/sex comes up in conversations, i can peic…
/r/seduction04/01/13 05:26 PM
1

Gonna be contraversial here on Seddit. Let me preface this by saying that I am more than satisfied with my sex life, but I don't expect everyone who takes this into account or lives by this to be as successful in their love life as I have been. I consider myself very fortunate in that regard. I personally, don't really think most women are better of for having romance in their lives, and, at least, think most of them substitute romance/sex for a large host of things. If we taught philosophy, med…
/r/seduction03/01/13 01:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter