TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MattLyte Archive

View 0 posts and 165 comments by MattLyte on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The fact that you think I care to appeal to you is actually hilarious. "Junior." That's fucking cute. Why don't you tell me about yours? You're the autist trumpeting it. "BPD Chicks" is a retarded and absurd categorization and indicative of a will too weak to stay with a difficult subject until you'd achieved a categorization that allowed you to actively make sense of what you were dealing with, instead of just discarding it out of fear. Edit: Wow, you sure post on reddit an awful lot considerin…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/17 05:10 AM
1

Oh yeah hot stuff? You head up to canada to visit her yet?
/r/TheRedPill30/08/17 04:24 AM
1

Basically, kill yourself fampai You could not possibly have a more armchair, weak-willed evaluation of your topic.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/17 03:29 AM
1

No it wasn't an argument I thought you were making, it was one of two possible arguments in support of the point you were arguing. I described the other possible argument as well (all as one) and you never even touched it, so we know you weren't making that one. So, either you were making the economic argument, or you had no argument at all to support your proposition. You might think you did, but if it's not one of the two I mentioned, it doesn't hold water. Am I capable of being wrong? Absolut…
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:47 AM
1

No you fucking retard, how can you actually lose track of this? "The economy argument" are three words that serve as a label for a more complex concept that I already explained, and will copy for you. It's called referencing, and it saves a lot of time when you're having big boy talks. How is this difficult? You're actually mentally retarded. When you asked about "the economic argument" that you should have already known because you proposed before me that it even existed (when you said "one can…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 11:06 PM
1

LOL not even a bit, every word I used was used accurately and effectively and you could ask anyone at any time to explain it, if you knew anyone to ask. That's why I made the point that you could start there, and that's why you're still asking questions instead of starting on it. Edit: humanities LOL weak shot bud, drink some fucking milk, christ. Your pseudo-intellectualism is embarrassing. You don't seem to realize, but you've gone so long now without making a single argument, or even a point,…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 10:14 PM
1

Yeah whatever bud, I can see from how short your response is that you're still just asking questions like an 8 year old and contributing nothing interesting enough to even stimulate a yawn. Not gonna waste my time. Remember when you asserted "One can be argued to be the primary benefactor of any virtuous action one takes."? Substantiate that if you have two neurons to rub together, or your comment about jargon. I'll be eager to read it but we both know that you're too mentally deficient to produ…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 09:53 PM
1

Did you actually read my reply? Your post is still right here in the thread, directly above mine, there's no confusion over what you said. It's not a quote, it's a greater than symbol, which creates an indented paragraph. When you use the site's quote functionality, it automatically inserts the greater than symbol to separate the quote, for readability. However, a quote is an exact copy of your words, intended to be attributed to you. What I posted was a greater than symbol, followed by a mocker…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 08:17 PM
1

I can't help it if you abandon all your arguments and dip over the edge with a quick chirp while I'm taking 2 minutes to edit something complex, you wasted fucking space case. Your comment was a complete shitpost so there was nothing related to alter anyway. Are you really this desperate? what is economics If you're not trying to argue that moral actions benefit you because we're all one, which is a solid argument but will not be understood in such an ossified example of unfettered capitalism, y…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 07:27 PM
1

Sloppy retreat, sea lion. Sloppy
/r/MensRights22/07/17 07:10 PM
1

You could argue that, yeah, but you'd need to get into the nature of self and consciousness in order for it to actually hold, which would be just a really stupid and irrelevant expenditure of mental energy for you. The economic argument seems interesting if you've never considered it, but you'll quickly realize scale and lifespan prevent a return from ever being realized unless you only exercise virtue selectively, in which case it's not really virtuous at all. So, no, unless you're a sea lion, …
/r/MensRights22/07/17 07:01 PM
1

Virtues are about morality and I don't see any particularly moral component to living in balance. When doing something benefits you primarily, it's not really a moral decision you're making.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 02:34 PM
1

Then it's not really a virtue, though it's a distinction I don't think is meaningful.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 08:06 AM
1

If you have a serious addiction problem then your case might be unique, but in general alcohol is no problem.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 06:58 AM
1

Population control - wealthy people don't have to consider this.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 10:21 PM
2

It's fucking hilarious watching the proponents of this russia bullshit bury themselves in their own graves. They wouldn't want to go out without showing the entire world every last, dark corner of their fucked up mind though.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 10:20 PM
4

Lmaooooo human beings who think they're intelligent always fail to realize they're mortal. Humility is the most intelligent of all virtues.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:53 PM
2

The wording in this article is a work of art
/r/MensRights18/07/17 05:25 AM
2

LOL
/r/MensRights08/07/17 09:28 PM
6

I'd be afraid if there was a black person in my house too
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:14 PM
3

It looks like her twitter is just a followbot and a linkbot, can you corroborate the quote about planning to potentially accuse anyone of rape? That's pretty straightforward conspiracy.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:01 PM
0

Do you realize that you are actually a crazy person grandstanding for no audience?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 07:45 PM
0

wow
/r/MensRights18/06/17 11:53 PM
0

Why do I have to cite any data, you fedora? I'm not making any assertions that would require any. I'm just saying yours is meaningless, because everyone knows reddit is mostly left.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 08:08 PM
0

No, it cites a poll of Reddit. All MRA's do not visit Reddit.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:15 PM
0

You are absolutely, pathetically stupid. I looked at your link. A survey of reddit is never going to return conservative participants unless you do it on r/the_donald. Retard.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:59 PM
0

Ur a joke bruh
/r/MensRights17/06/17 10:20 PM
1

Wow you actually don't understand how to follow comments
/r/MensRights17/06/17 08:14 PM
2

Jesus christ that thumbnail is a hellish abomination
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:56 PM
0

You don't speak for anyone, no-one would let your juvenile ass do that you fucking shut-in. Your low-quality ms paint graphs from an even lower quality internet study don't mean shit, and no-one will ever care about them.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:53 PM
2

"You're wrong and I'm right" Sums up all you have to say. You're a fucking mong, don't share your opinions.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:51 PM
0

How about you shut the fuck up
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:47 PM
1

You fuck off faggot try reading again
/r/MensRights17/06/17 10:19 AM
3

sorry I was kinda rude initially, didn't really consider it
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:21 PM
1

Her mother is not "the problem," it's the mother this poor girl has, and telling her that her mother is a "problem" in general will severely warp her view of people. She did a terrible thing and can be pretty well labeled a terrible person, but telling her daughter she's a problem is foolish and ignorant. Won't help anyone. He has no obligation to stay around unless he wants to, it would be a shitty situation but he didn't choose it. He has to take his own agency now. He's only obligated to be k…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:15 PM
2

No u loser
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:13 PM
2

That's a bad assessment, and bad advice. Plz stop before you advise again.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:12 PM
2

It's a shit situation, all around. Truer words were never spoken.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:11 PM
1

What is this? Link the actual video plz
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:28 PM
2

Unbelievable. Britain is trash.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:25 PM
1

This guy should probably just kill himself before he passes his genes on.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:59 PM
4

Take a look And you'll see Into your imagination We'll begin With a spin Traveling in The world of my creation
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:01 PM
1

Oh, you're retarded
/r/MensRights09/06/17 06:31 PM
3

How do you even... nigga whaaat? Your comparison is utterly inept, and you were arrogant about it too. Embarrassing!
/r/MensRights09/06/17 05:56 PM
1

Good thing it won't matter, in this case at least
/r/MensRights09/06/17 05:54 PM
1

It's not offered because it's not seen as necessary, the veracity of which is debatable, but also because it's not very masculine and probably no-one would want to wear it.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 11:42 AM
1

Might get made fun of
/r/MensRights09/06/17 11:40 AM
7

Women can't be removed from the social fabric, human beings require sexual dynamics to function socially. Even if the relationship is damaged and abusive, women still play a major role in Islamic society. No society could function without one half of its' members.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:18 PM
3

No, it's a pretty good answer.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:12 PM
3

The fact that women reliably receive shorter sentences doesn't affect what sentence should be given out in the first place. You're taking this to a really weird place.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 08:09 AM
-3

Weak
/r/MensRights06/06/17 08:05 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:38 AM
2

Do you actually think, at any point of the day?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:01 AM
16

He should go to jail for a few years imo
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:04 PM
1

"opportunity" You're a fag alright
/r/MensRights03/06/17 09:53 AM
1

Lol you actually are retarded tho? I kinda feel bad now
/r/MensRights03/06/17 09:21 AM
2

So what you're saying is that you're mentally retarded?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:45 AM
2

No, your english is bad, knowing 4 other languages won't make you any better at the intricacies of it, absolutely zero people were impressed you stupid faggot. Calling me a troll doesn't make you seem clever for "figuring" it out, and your veneer of class is about as thin as soviet wallpaper, so just stop trying.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:33 AM
1

It would help if you could learn English before trying to speak it you absolute fucking retard
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:03 AM
2

Wtf are you even saying, socialise yourself pls
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:55 AM
5

Witty, but no less stupid for it.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:43 AM
9

You can't really generalize like that
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:24 AM
2

No
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:25 PM
6

Is it supposed to be a joke? Bad taste...
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:26 AM
13

It's his stepdaughter you mong
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:38 AM
18

That's a socially liberal oversimplification.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 12:31 AM
2

Mattress "girl," look at that boyish grin. What a champ.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 12:25 AM
11

How is it oversimplified, or conservative?
/r/MensRights26/05/17 12:22 AM
1

You won't be considered a feminist unless you adhere utterly to their views, there is no room for your opinion.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:45 AM
2

Totally unfair, basically just a completely garbage opinion famalam
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:38 AM
1

caption
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:13 AM
1

No, you find it hard because they respond violently to differing views. It's not because of some sob story about stereotypes, it's because of their decision to behave poorly. No-one can force a person to be rude. They're not some poor, traumatized victims hiding in some corner. Feminists are aggressively vocal and cause trouble for all sorts of people over nonsense. They're not helpless waifs who can't make their own decisions, and one wrong doesn't excuse another.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:10 AM
1

You're laughable.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 07:18 AM
2

"Plenty of obnoxious things you can do with facts." Like state them? Good grief, your victimization is gonna break my scouter. You are such a perfect example of everything that is wrong with the self-important, me-first narcissism of postmodernist feminism and marxism in general.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:50 PM
1

First off, calling people "those sort of folk" is a)prejudiced, and b)naive. So right there, you're a bad person, no matter how much virtue you wanna signal. There are 4 separate parts of the april 17 guidelines that conflict with this practice. "Engage in Good Faith. Healthy communities are those where participants engage in good faith, and with an assumption of good faith for their co-collaborators. It’s not appropriate to attack your own users." Banning people just for daring to expose themse…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:45 PM
1

Bin that knife m8
/r/MensRights22/05/17 08:32 AM
9

Yes, auto-banning is banned, god damn every single thing you've said is retarded, this thread should be protected by the national parks service or something.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 08:13 AM
2

Why were you going on about suicide and shit, that's really awkward
/r/MensRights22/05/17 04:47 AM
1

Can you substantiate that assertion?
/r/MensRights20/05/17 02:59 AM
1

It is beyond clear that you have absolutely no understanding of the social constructs surrounding the stigma that this article is talking about. You may have grown up isolated from the social structures that perpetuate this, but that makes you ignorant, not correct.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 07:23 PM
6

What the fuck sort of a moronic question is that?
/r/MensRights19/05/17 07:20 PM
3

Blah blah blah concern trolling
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:57 PM
3

You blather on about "problematic" posts, but you can't substantiate it with any examples, much less explain what's wrong with them or why people shouldn't post them. You complain that there isn't enough focus on the few activists there are for mens' rights, but you do nothing to shine a light on that yourself. You complain that mensrights is hateful, but feminist subs are ten times more common and a hundred times more overt in their hate and prejudice. Basically, you've got nothing, get fucked …
/r/MensRights18/05/17 10:29 PM
0

The nose knows
/r/MensRights09/05/17 05:20 AM
1

Anyone who would promote or defend a statement like that is a disgusting human being.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 10:13 AM
1

yeah a 22 000 lb bomb made just to kill babies you get 'em clementine
/r/MensRights21/04/17 11:59 AM
4

He's beyond stupid. You may be able to finally explain the problem with this to him, but it will waste so much time and he'll still be retarded. It would be like wrestling with a porcupine, no matter the outcome you're not going to win.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 05:05 PM
8

You cannot be this stupid. I cannot believe I'm actually reading this shit. Go beat up street signs in california, it's the most you'll ever accomplish with a mental apparatus like that.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 05:01 PM
8

Are you retarded? Impaired mental functioning??? This wasn't a fucking hard choice, there's no challenge, it's not like she had to solve a fucking Rubik's cube to not leave the kid. If her mental functioning can be so impaired by depression that she tries to murder an infant, her own infant, then her mental functioning is unstable and it could easily happen again. Taking custody away is to protect the child, her sadness is tertiary after her attempt to fucking murder the kid.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:59 PM
7

Great example, thank you. There is no excuse.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:56 PM
30

Is this satire? A silly and poor choice? Throwing an infant human being away like trash? No, knowingly leaving them to die a brutal and horrific death? If the post isn't satire, then the poster is. You can punch an adult in the fucking stomach and get more punishment than this cunt.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:54 AM
7

He was the kind of person who would go to starbucks, though, so all is well here.
/r/MGTOW24/03/17 07:51 AM
2

You should probably help your mom today. Maybe do some dishes for her, or take out the trash for once. She works hard to keep a floor over your head.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 04:47 PM
2

It's probably best if you avoid posting on here, because you're just gonna get us associated with whatever mental deficiency causes you to say stupid shit like that. How the fuck are pedophiles even remotely related to this? You clearly have something wrong with you.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 04:13 PM
1

I don't see how your mental associations justify juvenile and vapid dismissal of people who are different.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 03:33 PM
2

Many would say a 35-year old manchild is the poster boy for MRAs.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:31 AM
3

It's just "explaining things in an arrogant or condescending way." Calling it mansplaining is sexist, and more importantly retarded because it implies that there's an inherent flaw in being a man that causes you to do this specific thing in an even more specific way. If you use the word mansplaining seriously, you might as well just save everyone the hassle and stop trying to think about ideas.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:59 AM
7

Ohhhh. Yeah ok, I honestly wasn't really talking to you as the OP. I know that's the standard conclusion to be drawn from what I said, but I wasn't really thinking about it. It was just a general statement to whoever.
/r/MGTOW23/03/17 06:14 AM
4

I'm not sure what you're getting at
/r/MGTOW23/03/17 05:42 AM
1

Can't stress enough how smart this advice is. From the sounds of her, she WILL believe you took advantage of her, and try to get you back. Protect yourself first, then tell her to leave.
/r/MGTOW23/03/17 04:54 AM
2

Can't stress enough how smart this advice is. From the sounds of her, she WILL believe you took advantage of her, and try to get you back. Protect yourself first, then tell her to leave.
/r/MGTOW23/03/17 04:54 AM
23

If this is a real anecdote, and you did not immediately leave her, you are whipped.
/r/MGTOW23/03/17 04:47 AM
1

LOL of course, a "redpiller", right on chief
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:00 AM
-1

It's a distinct feel about her, no way to know for sure but I have a strong suspicion.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 10:13 PM
-1

I opened the comments to say that too, fucking classic angry leftists
/r/MensRights21/03/17 08:59 AM
7

kids actually generally tend to veer away from their parents' errors, which is unsurprising when you consider natural selection
/r/MensRights21/03/17 08:59 AM
10

"If he’s at the point where he thinks women shouldn’t have jobs and that they should be “seen, not heard,” he’s a Red Piller and a douche." So it's only the connection to the red pill, and not the initial attitude, that is bad. Garbage pop-up site, I keep seeing it posted. Should probably have a chat with the people posting it to make sure they're not advertising.
/r/MGTOW18/03/17 01:37 PM
3

That was the point ya dingus
/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:52 PM
1

"So, regular readers, how about all those points we already all agree on but won't and can't substantiate for the opposition we're supposedly trying to convince?" "Haha yeah we all love those same dozen generic, unsubstantiated talking points." "Alright! I'm a journalist!"
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:56 PM
9

This will happen, because IT security, arguably more than any other professional field ever to exist, demands extreme devotion at the highest levels of pay. Being even 1/2 a day behind the curve can mean a total failure. The slightest weakness in a network or node's defenses can be turned into complete control of the entire system in as little as a minute, and the best recovery scenario would be completely replacing all hardware, with critical information irreversibly compromised. The stakes are…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:45 PM
2

I always knew she had some comedy in her somewhere!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 01:04 PM
10

Professional women's hockey is not a real thing. It is not interesting or exciting in any way. The explosive plays and the heavy hits that make hockey what it is are nonexistent.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 04:33 AM
1

I dont think you can cite internet comments
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:35 PM
2

It would leave a far worse impression on a baby's psyche than an adult's. As for your experiences, you can't blame your lack of confidence on anything but yourself. If you just hid the problem you were having, that was your decision.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:34 AM
4

How many times has it been independently verified?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:28 AM
1

Oh thanks for telling me how to think, obtuse propaganda poster, I couldn't do it without you.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:41 PM
1

I do love pointing out flaws, and since you have no argument but seem intent on derailing discussion of mens rights issues on a mens rights board with inane and meaningless technicalities, I have no other way to engage with you, princess.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:56 PM
1

"why do you persist" LMFAO
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:46 PM
1

LMAO you're pathetic. Little too much focus on others' perceptions and not quite enough on having an actual argument there, bud. If you feel traumatized by my overwhelming aggression, try cuddling with a pillow maybe, it helps.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:42 PM
3

Paying people less based on their gender is discrimination and has been illegal in many first-world countries for some time. It was already illegal in Iceland and elsewhere. This is just a PR stunt for people who don't understand how the law works, and an excuse to spend more public money on more government employees. Women make less than men on average because they do less on average. Compensation is proportioned to individuals, and can only be judged in comparison to that individual's contribu…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:02 AM
1

Boys will be affected because of sexism. The lack of concern for their relative predisposition to fight, the educational system's view of female tendencies as the default, is sexist. This would not be considered a reasonable solution to schoolyard fights if how boys act were considered as any priority. This is considered viable only because of the sexist attitude the modern educational system takes towards the behaviour of children. It's really easy to figure out if you're not stupid.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:48 AM
1

You sit around on a men's rights board trolling for people to argue inane points of contention with and you want to insult my maturity? Sure thing fam
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:17 AM
1

TROLLAN
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:12 AM
1

There's no argument, you're just new
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:39 PM
1

Im blown away by how dumb you are
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:38 PM
1

It's literally self-explanatory, holy cow you are stupid
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:11 AM
1

Because boys will be disproportionately affected by this for exercising their right to self defense you autist, christ, shit's not hard.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:07 AM
1

They're both parts of the human body
/r/MensRights12/03/17 10:44 AM
1

What's weird about that?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 10:26 AM
1

One could say the same for you
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:52 PM
1

As much as this seems frustrating, stop and think for a moment about how utterly worthless and impotent the UN is.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:45 PM
4

Of COURSE it is, snapchat magazine. Of course it is.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 01:04 PM
3

I don't see any criticisms of feminism on the wiki page, they must have cleaned that messy business up when you mentioned it.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 01:01 PM
1

I'm pretty sure that's not what happened, but I can't say for sure until I see it myself I guess. Like 99% sure it's not though.
/r/MGTOW08/03/17 06:09 AM
8

Well, fireballs are generally more valuable, but a lightning bolt could be what you need to close out a combo finisher against an overwhelming board state.
/r/MGTOW08/03/17 06:07 AM
11

Honestly, what the fuck. -Woman lies that a man is the father and he doesn't want it, he's stuck with it even if DNA says no. -Woman lies that a man is the father and he does want it, they take it away even though it only gets fostered. -Man is actually the father and he does want it, woman kills it to avoid burdening the foster system. At all times, men and their feelings, their stake, are considered 100% disposable. I feel a negative responsibility to a society that actively despises men so mu…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:56 AM
1

I'm a little concerned for you now but oh well
/r/MensRights07/03/17 11:54 AM
1

Anyone could tell it's not to make sense because you're clearly not even trying. I'm the only person whose jokes you've been pointlessly dissing so you're apparently at least half-blind yourself. Why are you even here? In the comments, or on the sub for that matter. Please do tell. If you don't think it's that funny then that's fucking dandy, son, but why post a stodgy, half-illiterate reply just to point that out? You're exactly the kind of antisocial troglodyte that gets MRA's misrepresented b…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:03 AM
2

No-one had to link anything to make it funny, why are you so upset? Did you overcook your tendies? What you said doesn't even make sense, try the preview function next time.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:41 AM
1

Lmao cracked still exists, that's funny
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:33 AM
8

If you were to say you felt threatened by a non-white person, they would invalidate your feeling by calling you racist for it. There is no getting through to these people, sadly. There can be no reconciliation with those poisoned by neoliberalism, because they are bigots and will not reconcile.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:01 AM
3

Im sorry if she was your waifu, she used to seem cute, truly a tragic loss to waifudom
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:58 AM
101

I always wondered what happened to Sarah Silverman
/r/MensRights06/03/17 03:08 PM
3

I could make an argument for all four, but I was specifically talking about number 3. A relationship can absolutely be a hobby. Relationships don't have to conform to your particular definition, or opinion, of what they should be in order to get the official seal of quality.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:58 AM
1

She literally has to stop and take heavy breaths. It would be sad, but the fact that she's trying to argue the point she is makes it comically hilarious.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 04:38 AM
2

You're objectively wrong there kiddo
/r/MensRights06/03/17 04:10 AM
3

They don't really portray that as an issue, but they go to lengths to not portray the cheating negatively either. It's a pretty one-sided situation so taking a neutral approach to it is still pretty sad.
/r/MGTOW02/03/17 11:00 PM
3

"her"
/r/MGTOW27/02/17 06:25 AM
6

I'm trying to understand what you're trying to say here but it's not happening.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 05:18 AM
3

What do you even know about Milo?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:41 AM
11

Kids raised by shitty juvenile parents are the worst. Where do you think human beings come from if not kids?
/r/MGTOW21/02/17 10:35 PM
-3

Comparing "modern women" to children is doing children a disservice
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:11 PM
1

Are you shareblue or something?
/r/MensRights06/02/17 08:32 PM
1

Why do u keep telling me to calm down? Are u trying to distract from something? Like how badly u got assraped?
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:42 PM
1

Deflect all u want, u got buttraped and then ran off crying, can't undo it now
/r/MensRights06/02/17 06:35 PM
2

You're just salty because you're stupid, your arguments are shit, and you can't defend them. Try harder next time loser.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 06:18 PM
2

One hundred percent it is, if the baby doesn't want to be in it. That logic is called language. Words mean the things they mean. Are you slow? You seem to imply some inherent moral component to subjugation, which doesn't exist. Morals are in the eye of the viewer. Putting a baby in a crib has a very good reason. Cutting up a baby's dick has no valid reason to be done.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 06:13 PM
7

The point is to get people's attention, hence the white clothes. It's not antisocial, or gross, it's not real blood, it's done for a specific reason at a specific time.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 06:10 PM
0

If you need to fuck up your dick to last longer then you're kind of a pussy faggot, bro
/r/MensRights06/02/17 06:07 PM
2

Thanks for explaining to this goon in detail why his ideas are incorrect. Good thing someone's doing it. No idea why he's downvoting you, I can't imagine anyone else doing it though.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 06:03 PM
5

God you're dumb. In what world do babies submit to the mutilation of their penises willingly? sub·ju·ga·tion ˌsəbjəˈɡāSH(ə)n/ noun the action of bringing someone or something under domination or control. Putting a baby on a table, and deciding to cut off a piece of its' body, is controlling it. The baby is not making that decision.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 06:00 PM
7

It is mutilation of a baby's body before it is old enough to consent or even understand. That is how it's in the same ballpark, asswipe. It's fucking disgusting how you type of morons all try to justify mutilating babies based on how hard they're gonna fucking cum in 20 years. A person's primary value is not sexual, and certainly not a goddamn baby's. If I just cut your left hand off, you can still clean my toilet just fine, so I see no reason not to do it. You certainly don't type out a decent …
/r/MensRights06/02/17 05:48 PM
2

1) you're wrong 2) even taking your incorrect facts as true, the difference lies in your (shabby) opinion
/r/MensRights06/02/17 05:38 PM
25

Is female genital mutilation an important issue for feminists?
/r/MensRights06/02/17 10:26 AM
4

I know you're a fucking dumbass ALOT
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter