TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MaxAuri Archive

View 3 posts and 67 comments by MaxAuri on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Why would man try to game it to have sex with a woman that doesn't want him, but somehow was tricked into formal consenting? The argument about ambiguous consent has entirely different side which is omitted in OP - when this about sending a man to jail/destroying his reputation. It is better to treat ambiguous consent as NO in the question of whether it is OK to proceed. But it can't be treated as enough beyond reasonable doubt to send person to jail. Between these two ends of the continuum ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:15 PM
0

No. It is much more about not invading boundaries of man
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 03:58 PM
–

Ah, I've just noticed the nickname of the OP. Seems that is pointless. Especially speaking about contributing peace.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 03:40 PM
-7

It varies. All women are different. Even the same women are changing and evolving. Some can be parasitic in the young age, but eventually grow older and wiser. Others can start good, but get jaded and start treating men bad. I'd say few women are actually contributing peace. There is a lot of talk about emotional labor, but in fact it is often just nagging and low key emotional violence against their man. That's why men preferring to be single often cite peace and mental stability (along with mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 03:34 PM
3

Second part (what I'd want women to bring to the table)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 03:24 PM
6

Fair share of money, chores. Peace and mental stability. Supporting each other in difficult times (when one of us is sick, temporary unemployed etc)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 03:12 PM
1

Of course there is no steep step at below top 20%. Still the skew is there and unattractive men have little chances. Even with unattractive women. Because unattractive women would still prefer attractive men - even if they can't guarantee their monogamy. In OP you propose unattractive men to hookup with women like attractive men do. This is delusional, because why would women pick ugly man for a hookup if there are more attractive men to pump and dump?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 02:54 PM
1

Attractive men sleep with women. With less attractive they hookup. With more attractive they get in monogamous relationships. Unattractive men are out of this picture. Unattractive women prefer to get pump-n-dumped by attractive men, rather that sleep with ugly men
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 02:47 PM
1

It proves nothing. Unattractive women sleep with more men. It doesn't mean they sleep with unattractive men. They sleep with more attractive men - as short flings and hookups. It doesn't contradict that unattractive has very little chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 02:20 PM
6

> I'm not suggesting that every man can do this, but that 80/20 belief is an exaggeration of reality where stats show women do indeed sleep up, but it is not 80% of women sleeping with 20% of men. Do you have better numbers? Based on what data? I'm not a woman, but I think this attitude would be repulsive to women. Even women that are not very attractive don't want to be considered "on sale", "discount". If a man tries to approach obese woman thinking that she'll give him a chance because she is…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 01:00 PM
7

They want male spaces to be policed and controlled, otherwise it is eeevil manosphere!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 12:35 PM
3

Actually this is a very common argument - pointing out at rape/murder statistics to claim that there is not a violence problem, but male violence problem. And you don't know anything about red pill. You are writing a pure strawman here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 09:45 AM
0

I have no problems organizing this stuff. I have just enough of the food, everything planned, I know what I cook, how many days of reserves do I have, when is the expiration date. I don't buy sweets, bread and junk food. Problems start when a woman tries to control and criticize. You can't win in this game even if you are organized. The only winning move is not to play. Don't cohabitate and have your separate household
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 03:53 PM
-1

Clearly we can't agree on this. It is better to not share budget and live separately, buying groceries for yourself, cooking, cleaning your own flat. No cohabitating - no opportunity for someone to whine about inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 12:11 PM
-1

The trick is - she controls and judges, criticizes when he buys something "wrong" or doesn't buy something she thinks is necessary, forgets something. A lot of women can't really delegate decisions
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 11:10 AM
0

It is not a generosity. It is controlling abusive behavior. Women don't let men have a say and criticize their every independent decision, than complain that men are distancing from making any decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 10:09 AM
1

And it is often self inflicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 09:08 AM
–

Making decisions alone means they DGAF about what their husband thinks and enforce their will. This is somehow again menbad
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 06:57 AM
13

Why do you think this sub has emphasis on the trad wives? I'd say the opposite is much more wanted here. It is a blue-pill/feminist strawman implying that men disagreeing with them are staunch traditionalists wanting tradwives and strict gender roles. Men can be stay-at-home dads. Or take fare share of parental duties. My wife didn't have milk, so I feed them via bottle. Lulled them to sleep. Bathed them. Changed diapers. We hired a nanny, then of course they went to kindergarten, when they grew…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 08:07 AM
1

I'm also not convinced that women really want men to do the chores. Because women actually do nothing to pick men based on these qualities of cooking/cleaning/readiness to do it in relationships. Women actively seek for resourceful men, but not for men who cook/clean. When I asked women about why not - they usually went super defensive. Even such questions get downvoted. So it is not even a real thing, but a bargaining chip - something to secure the position of victim and keep blaming men. They …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 11:01 AM
1

There is a lot of stating this fact. But what to do about it? No matter how often you repeat that dating is imbalanced and men are taken advantage of - women won't change. This is silly to expect that. Men need to either embrace happy singlehood to be better than imbalanced relationships or at least go abroad and try to find less misandrist cultures. Without actions complaints are useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:12 AM
1

But they still constantly think about men and hate them. The time freed from being in relationships with men is dedicated to misandry. They don't want to do anything with men, but are so obsessed with men they can't stop thinking about men
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 08:53 AM
7

Debate doesn't allow agreeing with OP. So the only allowed replies are antagonistic. This entire sub is heavily skewed to this kind of behavior and everything else is removed as circlejerk
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 08:51 AM
3

Staying single is OK. It doesn't mean that everyone will stay single. However, if more men stop pursuing women this may actually affect the game.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 08:10 AM
13

Yes - being a pursuing side is inherently worse. So - don't pursue. No amount of complaints about game being rigged would make it fair. As long as you continue playing unfair game, nothing changes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 03:10 PM
–

Do you want to say that 2X is an example worth emulating?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 02:30 PM
–

So it is better to quit dating if you are hetero. If you are bi - chose men. No need to date. Women are optional for men's happiness. I see thousands of posts complaining about women's attitude, but why are not you making the next step? Stop posting and just quit dating. We really need more posts about men living single and happy telling about their lives, rather than repeating this womenbad womenbad. Yes, they are bad. So what are you doing next?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:21 PM
1

Women actively defend this status quo and benefit from discrimination of men. It is true that a lot of men contribute to it too. But saying that it is only men who support it would be totally wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 08:29 AM
9

I think, starting with a generalization like "u all hate men" is a really bad move. I'm a man and I'm also concerned with the rampant misandry, yet being so antagonistic is making things even worse
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 05:45 AM
–

I live most of the time separately in different country for work. I have responsibilities for my family, I love my kids and support them. But if I could chose now, I'd chose to never marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 05:37 AM
21

I'm married and even if divorce, I'd prefer to live single. If I meet a woman and we have shared interests - we probably can be friends, but I don't to pursue women or somehow improve my sexuality. I go to gym to improve my health and because I enjoy it. I believe in decentering women and focusing on your own life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 01:00 PM
–

Yes, I don't believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 09:34 AM
14

Women don't compliment men in general regardless of body type. Yet they certainly pick one type of men. And this preference is usually masculine men conforming to the hegemonic masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 09:34 AM
17

I think liberals vs conservatives are alien vs predator. Both are enemies of the interests of men as a group. Yet once men realize they are a political group, politicians may start to actually propose something to us in exchange for votes. When support of left and right is close to even, a small organized group of men can be a kingmaker by picking the side of whoever proposes some improvements
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 01:24 PM
2

Paraphrasing an old joke: besides being hot and rich he should cook and eat her out.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 11:56 AM
1

That's nice. Still there are lots of women's complains and men's complains about dating. If we assume that women are honest about their complains - then the problem might be fixed if men advertise the qualities I listed and women pick them. Dating is screwed if men are expected to be super hot (genetic factors mostly) and very successful - limiting the dating pool to a small portion of men who can be promiscuous pump and dump, because lots of women chose them. Cooking and oral sex skills are not…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 11:54 AM
1

Men are not monolith. Some men never settle and continue hookups. Some want peace. Some want stability. If you think that all men are like you described, it probably means you pick this kind of men and ignore others.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 11:47 AM
6

I'm a man and find virginity obsession stupid. If woman is still virgin in her 20s this is a yellow flag. It can be caused by weird ideas or extreme religious beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:23 AM
–

It is not the (main) reason. Men complain that they don't get custody. Women bluff "go on take the full custody" - expecting men to chicken as they supposedly don't want children, but want to piss the ex wife. But if men really wanted to get custody, they would be glad to take it. Not because of challenge, but because they wanted it in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 12:23 PM
-1

I don't know. Apparently women are not doing anything to justify relationships either. I'm married and prefer living alone. I like cooking and my flat is pretty clean. And I hate nagging and fighting. So women in mans life is net negative (from my experience). I don't hate women, I have female friends and like to talk on various topics. But why live with them under one roof?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 08:49 PM
-5

This is a common talking point, but if the chore imbalance is such a big deal, why women are not filtering men by the contribution to the chores, but a filtering them by income/looks/masculinity/assertive behavior? There was a question here recently. So far it seems that women prefer to do more home chores to keep guilt-tripping men. If that would be indeed such a big factor, men doing cooking/cleaning would be most successful in the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 08:08 PM
2

Successful women wouldn't intimidate men if they wouldn't shame them for not being man enough/not successful enough. Don't use your success as a stick and there will be no problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 08:48 AM
1

There is no way to know which women do it before they do it to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 08:06 AM
2

True. But nobody calls women reluctant to open up to men as toxic femininity et.c.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 03:18 PM
3

So women are cautious around men and this is understandable. It is not the same as sweeping generalizations and demonization. But if you say that you can't automatically trust men, watch your drink, chose public places for dates, have your own bank account, et.c. - this is understandable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 02:25 PM
9

I think, experience varies. Many men have bad experience about sharing something with a woman. It doesn't mean that every woman is bad, but there is a significant risk. Worst thing is - you don't know in advance who will backstab you. Shitty people have no labels on their forehead. Here we come to the famous feminist metaphor about 10 apples of which one is poisoned.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 12:26 PM
6

Can you back the claim that most (50%+) are so?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 12:22 PM
19

Opening up to women is generally a bad idea. Talk to the therapist. Sometimes you may vent to other men anonymously. If you open to women you get shamed, bullied or if it is your women - she'll use your vulnerable spots next time you have an argument. So yes - opening up to women is a bad idea, but not for the reasons you imply
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 12:02 PM
–

> Do you not do that with people in general? Epstein? Diddy? Weinstein? Some people are bad. You can't always know in advance. There are no predictors and filters that would allow preemptive detection of likes of Epstein and Weinstein. If there would be such filter, crime would not exist. Still men and women are notoriously bad at foreseeing who is a bad spouse. Your post assumes there is some way to detect bad women preemptively. You also somehow assume that men are choosing bad ones instead of…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:47 AM
2

This argument seems like a not real Scotsman. When woman does something bad you reclassify her as a morally bankrupt and not one of the good ones. There are no detectors and predictors of behavior of women. Men are not telepathic. But when relationships end up sour, you can retroactively blame for not choosing good enough. Actually men victimblame women who've chosen an abuser the very same way - "You had to chose better"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 09:20 AM
7

Unless you are in France (and some other European countries). There you go to jail for doing test without court sanction. > Women are better. Women can bounce back after after a tragedy and hurt like men can't, women have uncanny ability to adapt. Also OP is clearly sexist
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:10 PM
1

Women got certain benefits: better education outcomes, growing employment, while employment of men falls, no legal discrimination in the developed countries, while men are conscripts, retire older despite living less, men are majority of workplace fatalities and majority of homeless, men receive harsher punishment for same crimes. Do you regard pointing at female privilege as misogyny?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:07 AM
–

Kind of agree. You need to visit his place, which may be considered as a pretext for sex. Not something you do on first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 08:02 PM
–

So that's the answer to the question, you have other priorities
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:57 PM
–

No need to ask blunt. Small talk and discussion of hobbies. As if he does cook now and have any favorite recipes. Say that you like men who cook. Trust me, if he does - he will gladly share, maybe even have photos. If he doesn't - you'll have your answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:55 PM
–

How about this line: - What do you like to eat? - Do you have any favorite recipes? - It is wonderful when man cooks!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:49 PM
–

Yes, agree - any kind of double standards should be a red flag
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:46 PM
–

Hm. If the idea of man doing cooking makes him run, probably you just dodged a bullet? Apparently he is sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:45 PM
–

Many med do cook and clean, maybe not majority but significant quantity. Why don't aim for this group?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:44 PM
–

I don't think speaking about food is an interview question. It fits the small talk and "I want to know you better"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:29 PM
–

> There is no woman who will ask a man if he can cook or clean in the beginning dating stages. That’s insane and not normal. Why? People ask about work, but eating is a part of everyone's day life. As a man I see such question as less cringe than asking about money
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:22 PM
–

How do you filter for "not sexist" quality? I mean, if you just ask, he'll say he supports gender equality. So probably you need to judge by some less obvious flags
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:20 PM
–

Given you think so bad about men, why do you even date them? If not all men are slobs, why don't you try to set up filters better to pick the good ones?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:09 PM
1

Men are not "punished" men are collectively guilt-tripped. Past is used as a pretext to push discrimination of men. And when men object, there is a boogeyman of a patriarchy. So it becomes difficult to defend men, as this is equated as being against equality for women, because women were discriminated in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 02:34 PM
1

Not all men here have dating problem. Probably not even majority. This is a discussion club, not an incel-den. Even men who use certain talking points about how dating is unfair can be in relationships or married
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 02:32 PM
3

Rejection means making a move and getting rejected. Not approaching someone is not rejecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 04:42 PM
-2

Do you have any numbers to back your statement? If men reject women who are, as you said "over-weight or book-smart" than these women should have first approached these men to get rejected. Does it even happen? If yes, why do you think this happens on a similar scale?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 03:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter