Melodic_Eye8341 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
10	Communication often defeats the purpose	Debate	Melodic_Eye8341	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/24 07:40 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	THIS WILL ALWAYS♾️ BE🐝: POSTS📮 WITH AFFIRMATIVE✅ CLAIMS GET MARKED WITH "DEBATE"🗣️ POST FLAIR DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD I just came across the phrase "rosterless" used by some whore on twitter which seemingly means when a girl doesn't have a roster of dudes she can go hook up with when she's lonely/horny. I need to know other people are as disgusted by this term as I am.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/11/24 05:56 AM
2	Communication often defeats the purpose Women don’t shy away from good, mutually gratifying sex. This is just ignoring the fact that many women simply don't desire sex much.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/09/24 02:30 PM
2	Communication often defeats the purpose If a person is initiating sex more, the partner feels sexy, but they might not want to have sex so often and thus they reject the initiation I wasn't suggesting that they'd reject more sex, just that their problem isn't that they want more sex specifically, and if they didn't want more sex, they would just initiate less themselves rather than rejecting their partner's initiations.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/09/24 02:23 PM
4	Men, would you choose love or sex? I would choose the first option but I'm not sure exactly how she could even exist. If she doesn't care for me at all, even on just an attraction level, for what reason would she have regular sex with me and indulge my kinks? I think a better question would be: would I choose a woman who loves me or a woman who lusts for me if they were mutually exclusive. I would choose the woman who lusts for me.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/24 11:22 PM
4	Communication often defeats the purpose Yes.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/24 10:35 PM
1	Communication often defeats the purpose I certainly wish it was that easy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/24 10:27 PM
2	Communication often defeats the purpose I don't think I disagree with anything there. Though I can't say I've ever trusted anyone enough to take that tact with them and I can't imagine I ever will. I suppose I just have to hope to find a flawless relationship that won't need it...	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/24 10:24 PM
2	Communication often defeats the purpose Okay, sometimes I want to cuddle more or I want him just listen to me complaining about stuff The same logic still applies. If what you want is simply those acts themselves and not particularly what him initiating them on his own would represent, then there's no problem in communicating your desire for them. If you do desire what him initiating them on his own would represent, then communicating your desire for them defeats the purpose of him initiating them in the first place, doesn't it? Becau…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/24 09:46 PM
2	Communication often defeats the purpose Maybe the woman didn't realize that her lack of initiating was making the man feel less desired. Except that is actually a good thing, because as long as she doesn't realize that, any initiation of sex by her can be read as indication of just sexual desire. If he made her aware of how it's made him feel less desired, then her initiations of sex are more likely just an indication of her caring about his feelings, which isn't what he felt she lacked in feeling for him. It was sexual desire specifi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/24 09:18 PM
2	Communication often defeats the purpose If I want my husband to go on a date to a new place with me, I can ask him or I can just sit there waiting for him to magically know that I want to try this new places, although, I know perfectly well that he's content with our usual itinerary. Sure, but the difference there is that what you desire is the act of seeing new places with him itself, not what the gesture of him suggesting it on his own would represent. So it isn't quite analogous to the example I gave.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/24 09:07 PM