TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mental_Rooster4455 Archive

View 3 posts and 115 comments by Mental_Rooster4455 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

literally 0 evidence to support this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:56 PM
2

Fact check: completely false https://i.imgur.com/HGlnCTJ.png.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:42 AM
2

The percent of women not having sex is higher than that of men https://i.imgur.com/HGlnCTJ.png. Have you ever thought about the idea that you’re making yourself mentally unwell for no reason, or just being played?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:42 AM
0

The 80/20 rule isn’t dead, it never existed. The percent of women not having sex is literally higher than that of men https://i.imgur.com/HGlnCTJ.png. You’re just making yourself mentally unwell ranting about “Pookie” and “Ray Ray”, whatever that cringe is.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:41 AM
1

All of these random percentages with no evidence or sources for them lol and all the while over 60% of US adults aged 25-54 are married or living with a partner. Have you ever considered you’re getting played?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:39 AM
0

It’s not based on a misunderstanding. It’s based on outright falsehood. A higher percentage of women are sexually inactive compared to men https://i.imgur.com/HGlnCTJ.png.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:38 AM
1

Most guys are not sexually active, most girls are. That is categorically, objectively, factually, completely untrue and delusional https://i.imgur.com/HGlnCTJ.png.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:37 AM
0

Then why are 62% of US adults aged 25-54 married or living with a long term partner? https://ct.counseling.org/2021/12/growing-percentage-of-american-adults-are-living-single/
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:35 AM
-4

62% of US adults aged 25-54 are either married or living with a long term partner https://ct.counseling.org/2021/12/growing-percentage-of-american-adults-are-living-single/. There is no “top 20%”.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:34 AM
1

Online dating gender ratios are literally 80% men and 20% women, explaining the like disparity. And if 62% of US adults aged 25-54 (and much more older) are either married or living with a long term partner https://ct.counseling.org/2021/12/growing-percentage-of-american-adults-are-living-single/ then how are most men not getting any action?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:33 AM
0

Second stat is. First encompasses millennials too, and the trailing embers or Gen X.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 12:33 AM
-5

Sure, but who would want to be associated with Neo-Nazis? Being a Marxist or Communist isn’t good, but it’s nowhere on the league of being a Nazi. Aside from being an inhuman, genocidal ideology, it always loses, it’s supporters live in never ending misery, and are shunned in all but the most seedy spaces. Why get sucked in to views even adjacent to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 09:19 PM
1

What’s an example of an average woman in your eyes?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 09:17 PM
1

Sure, but none of them are sleeping with ugly ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 07:29 PM
1

I love how it's increasingly clear that The Red Pill intersects with the alt-right and neo-nationalist/neo-Nazi groups in the US and abroad. Really explains a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 06:32 PM
1

That's a different story, but it's also another question entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 06:24 PM
1

Ding ding ding
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 06:24 PM
12

It doesn’t. She’s trying to put a positive spin on TRP’s world view but I feel like even tacitly attempting to entertain their fallacies isn’t a good idea. There is literally 0 evidence to suggest a few men are hoarding all the women. Over half of US adults aged 25-54 are married ffs
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 04:48 PM
4

There’s no deal to be made anyways as the idea that only a few men are having regular sex is not born out of any facts or reality. 62% of US adults between the ages of 25-54 are either married or living with a long term partner. Over 70% of men aged 18-24 are having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 04:46 PM
2

And...? What about the other 38%? I assume at least a portion of them are having casual sex or seeing someone but not living with them yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 03:18 PM
2

If only I got a penny every time men got called insecure for this...... Because you are, and delusional. Average woman can have sex with super attractive guys? Take literally any "stud" celebrity/actor/model, and show me the 'average' women he hooked up with. Unless we're defining, like, Anne Hathaway as average or something lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 01:55 PM
1

So why are 62% of 25-54 years olds in the US married or living with a partner? Over 70% of men aged 18-24 are having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 01:53 PM
1

Without quibbling over the details, yes. Can you provide a source to support any of those figures? OP suspiciously didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 01:50 PM
1

It was never a thing anywhere. 62% of young to middle aged US adults are married or living with a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 01:40 PM
0

Due to inflation Ahahahaha new data suggesting through dating apps that 5 percent men are getting all the like supposedly The gender ratio in users on dating apps is 80-20 men to women in the first place. What influence do you think that has on it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 01:39 PM
2

I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say this is why you keep losing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 06:54 AM
3

Sexually active means having sex not having had sex. I'm referring to the definition as per the study, not your own personal definition. You keep on making up whatever bullshit you want to. I literally cited as reliable a source as you can get! Are you unwell? If I missed math class I would have never graduated high school on time. Shows how much you know. Lmaooooooo cringe meter overload
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 05:14 AM
4

First a woman is hardly sexually active if her number of opposite sex partners is barely 4. Second that's not the average that's the exception. What the hell does that even mean? Sexually active is defined as "having had sex" and as you can see, for women that have had sex in the US, their average number of sexual partners has been 4. An average is by definition not an exception. Did you miss math class in high school? Studies like that are not done on vast majority of Americans. That's...not ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 01:39 AM
8

It's disingenuous to ignore and deny the facts. Irony or trolling. The average number of opposite sex partners for sexually active women in the US is barely over 4, as I said https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n-keystat.htm. So the exceptions are not, in fact, the majority. They are exceptions, and rare ones at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 01:26 AM
9

“If they are not fucking you, they are fucking someone else” The impotent male insecurity that creates and sustains The Red Pill right there, folks. “Chads”, “Hypergamy”, “The Cock Carousel”, it’s all built around insecurity and that very premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 12:59 AM
8

What embittered pseudo-factual drivel. The average number of lifetime sexual partners for a woman in Europe is 7-8. In the US it’s barely over 4. Sure there are exceptions but this rhetoric about “cock carousels” and chads is just willful delusion not backed up by any facts. You’re right about stds though, those have been on the rise amongst young people and in college again in recent years. Something to watch and be careful of.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 12:57 AM
0

Thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 08:31 PM
1

What? I’m confused, it fits the sub rules and I want to share the perspective. What was wrong with the post?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 07:44 PM
1

Maybe that was true based off 2015 statistics but we’re in a whole different world now with the rise of Trump and the Trumpification of white working class chuds, the rise of incels and subsequent increase in doxing, harassment and threats to women, and the resulting collapse of the female ratio on the apps. It’s simply impossible for more people to meet on apps with an 80-20 or 70-30 gender ratio, there literally aren’t enough girls to go around! If dating apps are still the primary form of mod…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 05:37 PM
3

There’s a theory that OLD apps are actually closer to 50/50 More imaginary incel nonsense not backed up by any stats or sources? If women quickly dipped into apps and found a relationships, a similar number of men would be leaving the apps too, thus keeping the ratio more equal. The fact that they aren't shows that isn't happening. It's just a bunch of dudes on there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:47 PM
1

I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it was a bad joke then.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 03:29 PM
5

BRO, this is it right here. Summed it up perfectly. It genuinely drives me up a wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 04:56 AM
1

I'm not a man, and I'm talking statistical data here, not my own opinion or views https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/dating-apps-women-of-colour.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 04:36 AM
0

How are they proof of it? If women were satisfied and could get sex with whoever they wanted on tap, why are the gender ratios so lopsided (per the top post of this very sub as we speak)?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 09:33 PM
2

Statistically speaking women of color have a MUCH harder time on dating apps, let alone getting with gorgeous studs who for some reason happen to need to go on a dating app to get laid, so I doubt that. And no an ‘average’ woman absolutely can not, unless you’re defining attractive but not model-attractive women as ‘average’. Imagine a man that looks like Cristiano Ronaldo or Brad Pitt. Now imagine an ‘average woman’. Your kinda chubby-but-not-fat thick thighed 5’3 biology research assistant. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 08:45 PM
7

For women, if that means casually dating and getting railed by hot and sexy men when younger while focusing on job/education, and then settling with a more stable/financially successful guy to raise a family when older, all power to them! This "path" is only available to extremely conventionally attractive, usually white women though you say it like just any old woman can get with a Cristiano Ronaldo or Brad Pitt looking guy, which is just incel insanity lol attractive, well off men date similar…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 07:29 PM
-2

POWERFUL nations are still governed by women in high places, Queens, Women who inherited corporations, corporations Where? What nations? And how? The number of queens compared to kings is minuscule, and the percent of female-run Corps vs male run corps is virtually non-existent. Men run almost all businesses and corporations worldwide.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 09:09 PM
-4

https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:20 PM
-2

What’s the MRA counter to this point? Men commit 90% of all homicides and 86% of all violent crimes. MRAs then wonder why men are most prisoners and why people don’t take them seriously as a movement.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:48 PM
0

There hasn’t been a military draft in generations though, and men are things like the majority of people in prison because they commit 90% of homicides and 85% of violent crimes. They’re the majority of victims of crime…at the hands of other men. Not denying the issues men have, but there’s a lot of nuance MRAs ignore to spout “but what about us!!1!” and then complain about getting ignored. Things like falling behind in school, some media depictions, laws not having protections for male victims …
/r/MensRights14/02/22 06:29 PM
1

Speak for yourself haha just trying to engage in convo
/r/MensRights14/02/22 03:43 PM
2

BUT that same tech has IMHO enslaved men more and more. How?
/r/MensRights14/02/22 05:55 AM
1

80% of women are attractive…according to whom? And versus how many men? Furthermore, considering you say above that women are better off than men and it’s very hard to argue otherwise, despite the fact that everyone does and knows it isn’t true https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/, could you perhaps be using your own biases or your own frustration at your own life to project a nebulous system holding you down as a psychologic…
/r/MensRights14/02/22 05:50 AM
-1

Women are in general better off compared to men. It's very hard to argue otherwise. Come again? https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights14/02/22 05:47 AM
0

OK but even in your article, it talks about female managerial positions and business ownership being the second highest in Europe (to your point that it could be seen as more feminist than the west) but it’s still far behind men with women running just 1 in 10 businesses and holding 40% of managerial roles. So even there it’s a long way from equal, and that’s by far the best in Europe this side of Latvia as the piece discusses.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:54 PM
0

My country, even if we talk about presented aspects (that aren't especially meaning), is significantly more matriarchal. What country is that? Because only the employment statistics were from the US, all the rest are worldwide. And worldwide, female employment is nosediving as well https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalDiscussion/comments/q4ubmn/the_percent_of_workingage_women_employed_across/.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 07:53 AM
-1

wider view to social structure. Like what? Those are just words.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 06:56 AM
1

Well, 84% of the world is currently religious and here’s the gender balance in political, economic and social terms https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/. When you say a revolution back in favor of men and religion, how much more slanted do you mean?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:14 AM
1

You think the “woke” trend began 70 years ago?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:13 AM
0

Keep your hopes up with what? This is the state of the world https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/, where’s the “feminist dominance”?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:12 AM
1

Where do you want it to swing to from here? https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:11 AM
1

Where is it supposed to swing to from here? https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:11 AM
1

but confirmation bias is a thing. Like the MRA movement, no? I mean, imagine calling this world “feminist” https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:11 AM
0

What a feminist world indeed https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:08 AM
1

So why have women not broken through to hold any kind of sustained level of power in political or economic domains https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/? If these programs help so much, why do men dominate all of the high paying job fields?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:01 AM
-3

Lmaooooo so what sources aren’t “biased towards feminism”? Breibart? 4Chan? How do you people live where every mainstream source is dismissed as ‘uncredible’ and the movement doesn’t organize or protest or fight for causes? So is the plan for the rest of your life to come on this forum, rant about the state of ‘misandry’ and ignore all evidence to the contrary? Seems a bit hallow.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:35 PM
-2

In what world isn’t it a credible source? Is like, anything you don’t like conveniently “not credible” for reasons you can’t clearly define? But sure, have some more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/04/us/domestic-violence-international.html https://www.npr.org/2020/03/09/813699719/mexican-women-stay-home-to-protest-femicides-in-a-day-without-us
/r/MensRights30/12/21 08:28 PM
1

Do you think the world is more unfair to men instead of men in spite of say, this? https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights30/12/21 06:17 PM
-4

we live in a ridiculously gynocentric society We do? https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights30/12/21 06:14 PM
-2

However, rates of DV committed by men, like the rates of other forms of violence committed by men, are continuing a decades-long trend of gradual decline Literally living in an alternate reality https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-games/201909/the-number-women-murdered-partner-is-rising Meanwhile is there any evidence that female violence against men is going up?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 06:11 PM
0

Women have not only achieved equal opportunity but are advantaged in business ownership. I’d say that constitutes strides for them So why are they just 19% of business owners? https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/how-many-companies-are-run-women-and-why-does-it-matter-0
/r/MensRights08/12/21 01:39 AM
-2

1) with the court, we pretty much do lol 2) OK but if women still have made next to no strides against men even with these programs, are they really making much of a difference? 3) what does that even mean? It’s no longer in effect!
/r/MensRights08/12/21 01:11 AM
-2

No clue what this is even referring to. But only 6 countries in the world are legally gender equal, and the US isn’t one of them https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/03/02/europe/world-bank-gender-equality-report-intl/index.html.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 10:34 PM
0

Like what? What are you referring to?
/r/MensRights07/12/21 10:32 PM
-2

Affirmative action - dying at the Supreme Court next year. Women owned business advantages - which ones? Can you name them? Because men run 81% of all companies in the world so how have these helped? VAWA - allowed to expire in 2018 and never renewed.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 10:31 PM
-2

women have more rights today than they ever had in all of human history Doesn’t mean it’s even remotely close to being equal.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 10:29 PM
-10

Men are 93% of the prison pop because they commit 90% of all homicides and 86% of violent crimes lol what do you expect it to be? So again, when talking homicides, it’s men killing men. What do you suggest be done about it? College admissions don’t mean anything when men still make more than women and dominate all high paying job fields.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 10:20 PM
1

CEOs of large companies represent a tiny fraction of 1% of all men Not talking about CEOs of large companies, I’m talking about running 81% of every large, medium and small firm in the entire world! https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/how-many-companies-are-run-women-and-why-does-it-matter-0
/r/MensRights07/12/21 04:16 PM
1

But it’s not the 1% of men though. If you just look at world leaders and billionaires, then sure. But men run 81% of ALL companies in the world. That’s not 1% of men. Men are 90% of the almost 100 million millionaires in the world. That’s not 1% of men. Men are 70%+ of all high paying and prestigious job fields like STEM, doctors and lawyers. That’s not 1% of men right there. Men earn 20% more than women on average. That’s not 1% of men benefitting there. 70% of working age men worldwide are emp…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 08:19 PM
1

Disproportionately well off relative to their share of the population, not disproportionately influential in government decision making and generally etc And they kept being persecuted because of their overall small numbers relative to the rest of the population. If there are 500 wealthy people in a country of 10M and there are just 1,000 Jews yet 150 are in that 500, it’s easy for a nazi to point fingers at the proportion and blame conspiracies to rile up hundreds of thousands of angry poor peo…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 07:55 PM
-9

until like 20 years ago It still is. Men run all the countries, the companies, have 80% average representation in political bodies, are the vast majority of people with significant wealth and the majority in all high paying professions.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 12:20 AM
-8

job opportunities So why do men dominate all high paying and high prestige job fields? Why do men run all the companies, are 80% of congress and the vast majority of people with significant wealth? I don’t see the patriarchy smashed in the US or modern western nations either.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 12:18 AM
10

Jews have historically never been in power for thousands of years Uhh what? Jewish persecution has always been based around the fact that they often work their way up to having a disproportionate influence in the upper echelons of society relative to their share of the population, which extremists then used to imply that it’s a conspiracy by these select few to keep everyone else down. That’s how we got the Nazis.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 12:17 AM
-17

almost all subs are feminist circlejerks So this is like Q but instead of a liberal deep state it’s a feminist one? Lol what subs are feminist circlejerks? Can you name a couple beyond the few actually FOR women (TwoX, TrollX, WitchesvP)?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:17 PM
1

As you can see from TRUMP’S CENSUS REPORTS, women are in fact barely a quarter of all stem students. Or is Trump working for the feminists as well??
/r/MensRights17/11/21 10:05 PM
1

every single part of the private non-government sector has been taken over by feminist ideologues who are actively preventing men from getting jobs, the government is helping the feminist movement on their goal of a mass male unemployement Any actual evidence of this? Because yet again the facts don’t bare it out https://www.salon.com/2021/02/19/womens-participation-in-the-workforce-hasnt-been-this-low-since-1988/. And while women are gaining in some fields, they are still miles behind in the hi…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:55 PM
0

Literally not what I said. And not what the evidence shows. But do you seriously not see how dumb you sound?
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:53 PM
0

I’m saying what’s the baseline of growth that it should be concerning or worthy of discussion in MRA spaces. Like if an industry is 5% female and then becomes 10% female over a period of a few years, it’s DOUBLED IN FEMALE REPRESENTATION while men have lost half a dozen percentage points of theirs, yet the field is still dominated by men 90/10. When does it matter?
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:56 PM
1

So you’re saying something that no evidence supports, and rejecting all available evidence as a hoax while choosing to believe in the baseless statements you made? Because that sounds healthy.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:55 PM
0

What does that mean? What professions are you referring to? And on what scale is this female rep growing? If an industry grows from 18% female to 23% female, are we talking an INVASION to make men OBSOLETE here, for example?
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:24 PM
-1

ALL companies (big, medium and small firms across the entire world)?? A ton.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 10:46 PM
-1

First of al you use world wide stats, not first world ones. Those literally are worldwide stats! It says so right on the sheets. Where do you get the sense or idea that these are solely from the first world countries?
/r/MensRights16/11/21 08:07 PM
1

There has been talk about men's declining participation in the labor workforce Sure, but men’s employment rate has gone down from 81% to 75% globally. A drop no doubt, but women’s has gone down from 51% to 43% which is a much steeper fall and from a much lower position to fall from. Like, it’s not good that men’s is dropping, but within the decade we could be looking at just 35% of women being employed globally compared to 65ish% of men. What does a world like that even look like? One pretty clo…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:04 PM
0

Female employment rate around the world is 43.2%, while it’s 70% for men https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalDiscussion/comments/q4ubmn/the_percent_of_workingage_women_employed_across/. Where’s the concern trolling and men suffering from employment issues more than women?
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:02 PM
-4

OK but what impact is it actually having if this is still the state of the world today? https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=usertext&utm_content=t1_hktpmxe&ampcid=1*bg98pn*cid*cThkX1RkcWp6M0ZqTE5zMGFXUF9WTEZXd3lnd3hyaF9ORFlQOXVFTlRMMnI3bUJrMTllZlEtUDNWRGt1LUtoeg&utm_name=MensRights
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:01 PM
-2

I’m providing sources to critically engage with what’s being said. Just because I provide evidence to show a claim being made isn’t true doesn’t mean I’m not being here in good faith. If anything it makes the entire MRA movement look to not be in good faith when a wild claim is made, sources are provided to show it isn’t true and when asked for counter evidence you are hit with “I DONT GOTTA PROVE ANYTHING TO YOU” or “get lost feminazi!!!” lol like do you think that could be why the movement isn…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 02:15 PM
-4

OK but where is a shred of evidence that men are falling behind in employment? I’m not shilling my posts, I’m demonstrating evidence via sources that shows the opposite. Do you have anything to counter with or provide a different perspective?
/r/MensRights16/11/21 01:54 PM
-13

Men are falling behind in employment? Uhhhh lol what? https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalDiscussion/comments/q4ubmn/the_percent_of_workingage_women_employed_across/ Also falling behind in college is only an American thing primarily and who cares when this is the state of the world https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=post_num_comments&ampcid=1*bg98pn*cid*cThkX1RkcWp6M0ZqTE5zMGFXUF9WTEZXd3…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:41 AM
-4

Because there’s no actual verifiable evidence of this. Like, none.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:23 AM
1

And they get it How do they “get it”? Go ahead and explain it.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 04:30 PM
0

yet now 60%+ of people in college are women and the feminist quotas for men to correct this over-quoting are nowhere to be seen) Women don’t outnumber men in college because of quotas, it’s because a lot of men are deciding not to take up all that debt and go to trade schools etc instead where they come out of and go into lucrative professions that ultimately still pay more than female dominated fields. Hence the general pay gap remains the same and is actually expected to widen.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 04:29 PM
-19

No they aren’t. Average globally is men make $1 for every 78 cents a woman makes.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 05:28 AM
-2

They want men to have 100% responsibility with 0% authority Not going well then is it? https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/?ampcid=1*15n0q73*cid*TmZTcFZTcDgzRnlSVGJ5XzJUa2tRc0p1VHVldm1HSnp3QlNHWE9weTNIaF81bTlOX3g3a2UtV0JRYWhacFY5bw..
/r/MensRights22/10/21 12:14 AM
-2

Yes because men commit 90% of all murders, 86% of all violent crimes and 95%+ of all sexual violence crimes. Why would you expect them to get more lenient sentences?? There’s no great mystery here.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 03:40 AM
1

Considering men run everything and monopolize all wealth, political and economic power https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/?ampcid=1*14mq14y*cid*VVZ4T3l4RFFXa3hNUVd5ZEMxN3pGVnNtT1ViMERJTW5TcW5XM1V6S3R3N1lXTVBya2V2UlgwMHZjOXpjR3VzWQ.. im gonna have to press X to doubt
/r/MensRights18/10/21 03:29 AM
-3

Like, FAR right. I suspect in terms of how they identify themselves it’ll be mostly centrist and right wing but most of the centrists will actually be right wingers that don’t wanna say so.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 11:20 PM
0

If you mean socialist/communist, there are just 19 such countries in the world today https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states. So what are you talking about when you say ‘left’?
/r/MensRights15/10/21 11:19 PM
-37

How do you think media and the government are biased towards women if men make more money, dominate all high paying job fields and monopolize virtually all political and economic power?
/r/MensRights15/10/21 11:14 PM
6

Why are you ignoring that he himself hooked up with several women that were with other guys before this? He literally did this to several other men and now he finally gets a taste of his own medicine and he’s giving up on “all modern women”? And people are sympathetic to his plight??! And GILDING this shit?? I’m sorry but you can’t complain about this sub and the MRA movement being dismissed as one of angry incels and crazies and then literally upvote that type of content. Dude was fine when he …
/r/MensRights13/10/21 06:55 PM
0

Perhaps this was him being held accountable for it since he freely admits he hooked up with several women that were with someone else in the past. This sub can’t complain about its perception or perceptions of the general movement being what they are when you get gilded and highly upvoted posts giving up on and generalizing “all modern women” and the dating scene because he finally got cheated on himself after doing it to several guys in the past. It’s hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 06:51 PM
2

So why are men 70% of lawyers and 75% of partners at law firms?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:37 PM
0

OK but how are you going to address said issues? By squealing about feminism online? What tangible goals are there in the MRA movement? Where is the proposed policies to improve lives for men? Where’s the political lobbying and protesting? Like what is it that you actually DO in this movement? Genuinely curious, is it just complaining about feminism online?
/r/MensRights07/10/21 08:39 PM
-1

OK but how are you going to address said issues? By squealing about feminism online? What tangible goals are there in the MRA movement? Where is the proposed policies to improve lives for men? Where’s the political lobbying and protesting?
/r/MensRights07/10/21 08:37 PM
-36

MRAs love to say “oh when people talk about successful men, they talk about the 1%” or whatever. But how does that square up with men running a full 81% of ALL companies and businesses (big, medium AND small) around the world? https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/how-many-companies-are-run-women-and-why-does-it-matter-0 is that just a tiny subset of men right there? How about men being a vast majority of high paying job fields like STEM, where they are 73% of the field? https://www.census.gov/li…
/r/MensRights07/10/21 08:12 AM
-3

despite most of them being factually 90% women dominated, because of said rules. (Psychology, doctor ect..) Are you saying 90% of doctors in Sweden are women?? Because it’s 39%….even in recent years more men are becoming doctors than women https://www.statista.com/statistics/968052/number-of-licenses-to-physicians-in-sweden-by-gender/. Stuff like this is literally why this sub gets mocked and derided.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 04:26 AM
1

Lol you’re just calling everything you don’t like garbage and then hitting me with sources just saying that the raw numbers outnumber men. But it says nothing about actual prestige and high paying work within those numbers, which still skew overwhelmingly male. Like, what is even the point of this? What are you trying to get out of this projected worldview? What’s the endgame?
/r/MensRights23/09/21 12:01 AM
1

Dude, you are once again conflating graduates and degrees with actual work, and prestige, high paying work, in the field. They are not the same at all. Also, “I’ve reported facts while you’ve reported propaganda”? Good lord 😂 you haven’t even linked to a single source while I’ve brought in half a dozen.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:36 PM
-4

there are more female law graduates and lawyers in the UK, Australia and New Zealand Women are 49% of lawyers in the U.K. but only 33% of partners https://www.sra.org.uk/sra/equality-diversity/key-findings/diverse-legal-profession/, so more than the US but also not a majority overall and certainly not a majority of the high paid and high prestige law work. In New Zealand, they do have a total majority of 52.5%, but are just 34% of partners and 23% of Queen’s Counsel https://www.lawsociety.org.nz…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 06:15 AM
19

Not a single male in the business studies courses? I find that hard to believe considering the gender balance of the actual associated industries. Where are you studying?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 09:00 PM
50

Men are disappearing from campus because they realize most degrees and most colleges are useless and just pile you into debt, so they go into trade schools and trades where they can and successfully make more than most women with college degrees. Men also may not be the majority of students in college anymore, but that’s been the case for decades, and men are still dominant in all of the high paying and high prestige fields such as STEM (73% - https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/01/women…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 03:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter