TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mhrby Archive

View 8 posts and 534 comments by Mhrby on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That does include penetration, but there are sub-paragraphs already in the relevant lawtexts below what they amending that dictates other forms of sexual activity are punished under the same laws. So under the Danish system you could be convincted for both "Rape" and "Rape with other sexual contact than intercourse", same as how they deal with sex with someone below the age of consent or someone of family relations. EDIT: Just to be clear, its a real catch-all the additional sub-paragraphs, not …
/r/MensRights02/09/20 10:51 PM
2

Indeed, seems Denmark was behind on this one, as searching a bit, the very first link was to a case of two girls getting convicted of rape of a younger boy (think girls was 16, boy 12) in Norway, with the conviction actually being for rape
/r/MensRights02/09/20 02:10 PM
1

There is no mention of penetration required for it to be considered rape. They talk about engaging in intercourse without partners consent, making it truly neutral as nothing about the gender or properties of the gender of neither the perpetrator nor the victim is mentioned
/r/MensRights02/09/20 02:08 PM
6

I wasn't totally sure when I posted this, the article said so, but I couldn't find the actual document from the political decision, but I did find it now https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=da&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.justitsministeriet.dk%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fmedia%2FPressemeddelelser%2Fpdf%2F2020%2Fenighedspapir_rent_pdf.pdf If I had more time, I would liked to make a better translation, as it does have some oddities in it like "rape sacrifice", when its supposed to say "rape vic…
/r/MensRights01/09/20 10:14 PM
2

Remember this, a friend had this on his wall well over 20 years ago when we was teen/preteens. It had a female version right above or below it (honestly can't remember which was first after all this time) which has been left out either of this handout or the photo of the handout. Remember the sections was identical while the labelling was different. Remember the big sections of the female one was shoes and some other clothing article, just as stereotypical. Whoever made it originally was just po…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:34 PM
16

Just to be clear: I absolutely think the sentence he got is a joke and should have been harsher. But one pattern I think we all recognize with the genders swapped is the wife killing/attempting to kill/attempting to poison their husband getting super lenient sentences due to seeming "remorseful" - this is just an example of how outraged people should be when a woman get off lightly, but they don't care at all when its a woman getting off with this kind of slap on the wrist
/r/MensRights06/08/19 04:54 AM
4

Got to say I highly question the conclusions drawn from the described experiment here; I just cannot follow their conclusion and must remain critical, even if it falls fairly neatly within a framework that supports my general views. So they examined a situation in 4 ways, with 2 different factors. Test subject could be male or female Test subject could face a female opponent who was either sexually-accessible or sexually-restricted And when a sexually-accessible female opponent gave an offer to …
/r/MensRights27/12/18 01:37 PM
1

Might be relevant to put it into context of danish law and the length of possible punishments for other crimes. Thievery, including breaking and entering - up to 1½ years Breaking and entering if someones home - +33% Simple violence - up to 3 years Severe violence - up to 6 years Especially severe violence - up to 10 years (this includes circumcision if the resulting damage is beyond the usual, so a bothced circumcision would fall into this, if MGM is outlawed) Negligent murder - 4 months - if e…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 01:43 PM
2

Had to do a bit of research, as that puzzled me, as I knew FGM was illegal since I was a little boy, so why a law on it in 2003. Found the law changes passed in 2003 including a summary of purpose, I'll translate below: The primary purpose of the proposed changes of law is to make it possible to lawfully punish Danish Citizens and people with residense in Denmark, who performs or contributes to the circumcision of girls and young womens external genitals, even if the specific act is not punishab…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 07:46 AM
2

Deleted my old comment - I made a mistake. I commented that as a Dane, I could report that they dismissed this suggestion from the population. I misremembered and it was another suggestion from the population that I had signed and supported that was dismissed immediately, they are actually still deliberating on this one. I was pleasantly surprised to find that out while trying to find a source for my earlier false claim of it having been dismissed.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 12:33 AM
3

Reporting a twitter post to facebook is most likely not going to help much. Not just you, but in general, why are so many twitter posts being mislabeled as being facebook posts on this subreddit currently?
/r/MensRights22/07/18 12:22 AM
13

No, the comic is making the point that SOME men are predators, and those who are, are going to go out of their way to get near their targets and appear not to be a predator, such as the male feminist
/r/MensRights09/06/18 11:06 AM
0

https://imgur.com/Cpo40aG Update from the dealership confirming gender of the original poster
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/18 10:55 PM
1

Alright, first obligatory "Im not a lawyer", but this is what I would do if I was in your shoes. Open a document to take notes (make sure it automatically saves online, backups are important) Open google Search your name Take each individual results that are defamatory and open in a new fan or window (on your own preference) Copy the web adress of each defamatory site into the document from step 1. On sites like reddit, make sure to use the report functions to report the content as defamatory an…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 12:31 AM
3

Im not making the "2.768 billion men are circumsized" claim (nor accepting it as true), just disputing your claim, which has been made before on this subreddit and always ends up not being backed up with sources (as its a myth that it has any help against aids).
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:35 AM
11

*Citations needed for those claims, as neither has been proven
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:51 PM
2

I know it does, so for posterity, here is a selection from the current top posts from the hot page on 9gag featuring potatoes (some images are small or gifs, so that won't include anything): 1: http://9gag.com/gag/aVqwPRO 8: http://9gag.com/gag/aOz724R 15: http://9gag.com/gag/aNAg980 33: http://9gag.com/gag/aqbgogY Those was the only 4 out of the top 50, but then majority of posts was short images, only actually opened one image that was large without finding a potato (large images are shortened…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:23 AM
1

9gag (the website its hosted on) community has an unofficial rule of adding a picture of a potato at the end of longer image posts. Bonus points from the community if the potato is creative and somehow tied in theme to the images of the post Will just quote my reply to someone else regarding the potato picture
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:25 AM
2

9gag (the website its hosted on) community has an unofficial rule of adding a picture of a potato at the end of longer image posts. Bonus points from the community if the potato is creative and somehow tied in theme to the images of the post
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:25 AM
20

way to little context given in the petition for me to even consider it
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:27 PM
14

yes, definitely is. A lot of impartial studies into domestic violence and IPV shows that it is pretty much equal in regards to which gender gets victimized the most, yet almost all shelters are female only. A long with a major overhaul in training/response police have to being called to domestic disputes, so men are not catagorically classified as the perpetrator by police, we could drastically move towards male victims being able to come out, if they also had a place to go to be safe after bein…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 04:27 PM
1

not ready at hand, and tbh, I can't remember what type of source it was, so can't really attest to how reliable it was without finding it again, so perhaps your understanding is the correct one :)
/r/MensRights05/09/16 04:43 PM
3

You are close to the truth here, I disagree with you about them not being wrong; They should have suspended first, then reinstated, rather than fire and rehire, but alas, can't change whats been done and end result is pretty much the same. She complained to Lyft, he got fired, she sent them the video as evidence of her allegations and on seeing it, they reinstated him; The video has since then surfaced, but apparently she did not upload it to the public herself, but rather someone else who had t…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:43 PM
60

Think you are confusing pedophilia and hebephilia. Hebephilia is the strong and persistent adult sexual interest in pubescent (early adolescent) individuals, typically ages 11–14
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:05 PM
7

It seems to follow the same fallacy that most opposition to MRAs follow, which is that because feminism tends to blame all the evils women face on men and patriarchy, then MRAs must be blaming women and feminism for all the issues we raise, which is not true. We blame feminism for working against any progress in the issues we are trying to adress
/r/MensRights21/08/16 02:04 AM
1

Only works for people from the UK, so maybe add some explanation for why this might be in any way relevant for /r/MensRights ??
/r/MensRights19/07/16 08:48 PM
1

Important to remember that the misogynistic attacks against it is largely contrived by Sony, who went through the comment section on their trailers and deleted all negative comments EXCEPT those containing sexism, in order to spin things in a certain way. Coupled with a huge quantity of feminist propaganda tied to the movie from early on in production and a seriously negative portrayal of men in this "re-imagining" (all men in the remake are either stupid or evil, no such standard was done to wo…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 04:54 PM
1

It a shoot and a miss here to me. Rather than shoot back at the sender, whom I highly suspect to be a feminist, and attacking feminist hypocricy, it is attacking women as a whole, coming across as misogynistic Also OP did not originally include any mentions of the original, easily done by making a picture of both of them side by side and a headline with "Both of these are sexist, if you only think one of them is, you are part of the problem" or something like that, instead it might be buried her…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 12:03 PM
2

I actually had seen that previously, but this has been purposefully changed to include a lot of negative stereotypes about women beyond the scope of the original (also offensive) post and is more attacking women than toxic feminist ideals. While the posted meme picture contains the same starting phrase in reverse "he has turned you down 4 days straight" vs "she has turned you down 4 days straight", the OP here changed the language of his submission to "your woman won't have sex after 4 days", a …
/r/MensRights18/07/16 11:24 AM
2

Whats with the woman bashing in this? Doesn't belong here
/r/MensRights18/07/16 10:09 AM
1

any archived version? Because the article itself doesn't say anywhere, from what I can see, that it is only for women it is a problem if done by opposite gender, it is not even implied that it is okay for a woman to do it to a man, but perhaps they changed it?
/r/MensRights12/07/16 12:08 PM
3

Not 100% sure, but from Denmark and, in general, we share a lot of our ways of doing things with Sweden. In Denmark, both parties are, in general, not named in news papers while investigations/trials are still on going, with few exceptions (generally not related to sexual crimes, but when the boss of a large company is charged with fraud, their identity usually gets out pretty quickly)
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:57 PM
6

I think it is pretty obvious that he did not mean "20 minutes of getting sex", but rather, as you said, meant the 20 minutes of him doing a wrong action. The logic is still absolutely insane tho; It takes less than a 1 minute to pull out a gun and shoot someone dead, would 1 year then be too significant a punishment? No, no it would not.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:21 AM
7

I think you are bordering close to the dangerous assumption that MRM = men and feminism = women. Whatever the dangerous double-standard opinions are held or reinforced by men or women, its a problem that needs to be adressed. Now for your question about why this kind of thing is happening - Well, not straight forward and easy, but its about social expectations of men and male sexuality, of our assumed role as the one to seduce/conquer our romantic partners, being the one in charge. And I, for on…
/r/MensRights03/06/16 05:47 AM
8

Basically it boils down to her pointing out 1 group of feminist celebrating an advance for men's issues and then pointing out a single guy who goes against it, and claim those isolated instances proves the blame lies elsewhere than with feminists. And I am sure that most who self-identify as feminists will think a men's shelter is a great idea, but at the same time, many feminists are also part of creating the atmosphere that leads to them being seen as unneccessary. Jakobias Wafford is a douche…
/r/MensRights25/05/16 08:51 AM
1

*37, if you are working full-time and not part-time
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:22 PM
1

And there is a big difference between social interactions with a pre-elected and/or short-term peer group overlooked by a or more biased adults (1 or both childrens parents) and social interactions with a non-selected repeated peergroup
/r/MensRights21/05/16 07:34 AM
0

They indeed can, as can all adults teach things to children, but that requires awareness of fields of knowledge to teach by the father, some of those details can be easily missed, while they come up naturally in social interactions with other childrens as suddenly their shortcomings emerge
/r/MensRights21/05/16 07:32 AM
1

I am actually a professionally educated (Bachelors degree, as required here in Denmark) "daycare" worker. Putting it in quotes as people with my education can also work in other functions than daycare, as "pædagog", so I have spent a lot of time in daycares here, but could only guess on the American version. But then our daycares work like preschools, from your description of things, just not with "classes", but with a structured day and learning plans
/r/MensRights21/05/16 07:30 AM
-4

Got to take the critical approach to this. Daycares where children train and build up natural social relations and learn through them are important and something his daughter would not get by spending the same time with her father. Now I don't know about the quality of the personel at American daycare institutions and which training requirements are in place there, but hopefully the development of social skills would be guided by professionals, while the child is in daycare. All that being said,…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 07:09 AM
3

Men and Woman suffer at close to an equal level from partner violence according to most studies in the area, yet we see a lot of posters about "stop violence against women". With violence happening to both men and women, the addition of the condition to the "stop violence" statement of "against women" is an insult to all men. It insinuates the violence is done almost exclusively by men, which is it not, and that women almost exclusively are the ones suffering from it, which they are not. If you …
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:58 PM
0

Sure, I'll play along and answer 1. Do you support or reject traditional gender norms and roles? For example Neither support nor reject. I think there are some key biological differences between the genders, which leads to some of the traditional gender difference, which we will be much better of by exploring with an open mind rather than vehemothly and categorically deny the possibility of in the name of a political idealogue. I'll answer your specific examples as well: that men should be earne…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 10:35 PM
4

According to comments in the other discussions, the men's only parking would be in the other end of the lot
/r/MensRights27/03/16 11:59 PM
2

"Divorce rape"? Please don't use such phrases/terms without explaining what you mean by that, what is a "divorce rape"?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:00 AM
1

I support their cause and also think there is a major cause for concern regarding the varying attitudes to someone dying, as it seems very different depending on ethnicity, gender and religious convictions of the victim, but disagree with a lot of their methods, such a stiffling free speech of those they deem the enemy, including journalists or bystanders from other causes. Their "safe space" convictions are damaging, and their close alligiance with some feminists organisations has lead them dow…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 07:53 AM
1

Your own source even refers to it as "Islamophobia" due to it being against Islam, the ideology, while being against muslims is being against the people who practice the Islamic faith. http://www.enkivillage.com/islam-vs-muslim.html
/r/MensRights15/11/15 10:25 PM
1

The religion is Islam, muslim refers to a person who follows Islam, so it makes perfect sense
/r/MensRights15/11/15 10:03 PM
1

I think there are a few factors playing into your perception here, which might form a sort of bias. Firstly, generally in media today, the campaign of diversity means that despite demographic data, the diversity of faces shown in almost all media is more equal than reality would have it, which means that when you go to a representation that is based on reality, such as politics or interest groups campaigning for something, the faces you will see will be much more white than the reality the media…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 03:27 PM
-1

This kind of generaization is part of what we are fighting against. My question would be: So what if all feminists are unattractive white American women? Obviously, not ALL of them are unattractive white American women, but even if they all was, that would not subtract from the validity of their opinion, just like their generalizations regarding MRAs being "white neckbeard virgin losers" would not take away from the validity of what MRAs are saying, even if it was true, which again, it obviously…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 02:14 PM
1

Ah, might be a cultural thing. I never really seen it applied to girls hitting boys here in Denmark. Or maybe I just have happened to have missed that.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 03:36 PM
0

I agree with her. The old trope of "boys hit girls that they like" seems to be enforcing a stereotype of boys hitting girls and only that direction, not the other way around, while as someone working with children, I see equally much hitting and kicking and other physical altercations going both ways between the kids. But you do never (at least I don't) hear someone explain away a girl hitting a boy with the gir just fancying the boy. But you do hear it when boys hit girls, which on impressionab…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 07:56 AM
0

It seems like the health community is saying that there is less of a health benefit return per dollar of investment when immunizing boys. Basically, if all the women are immune, then it can't pass from women to men, and them are also effective "immune". Now of course, this does nothing to protect homosexual men, or the poor unlucky boys who have sex with unvaccinated girls. I'll say the same here as I did on the discussion hitting the front page then: If boys not getting this for free is justifi…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:56 PM
2

Thats not at all what those from the barbershop claimed initially. Paraphrasing, they claimed their barbershop was a "safe-space" for guys to hang out and be men without having women around and that was part of their setup, so without even hearing what kind of haircut she wanted, they immediately refused her service, but defended that by having offered to pay for her to get service at another saloon. If she had come in and upon asking for a type of haircut they did not do, had been told they cou…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:43 AM
-2

Nope. Sorry, but I think you are entirely misunderstanding. I am saying the laws differentiate, not saying I think membership clubs makes it okay. Also, I am saying that people should be consistent; If someone believes its ok to sue for discrimination when the men was turned away at Chic CEO's event, then they should also think this barber deserved to be sued/fined for his discrimination. Also, if you oppose the membership woman-only gyms, why are you, seemingly, supporting this barbers right to…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 08:47 PM
1

The original news item about this said the woman who was refused service had reserved a time at the barber shop for her and her boyfriend there
/r/MensRights13/09/15 06:44 PM
-4

gyms are membership clubs and as such private clubs for members only
/r/MensRights13/09/15 05:14 PM
0

Member clubs are not the same as an open business; She had made a reservation, just like the men had. I mean, if you think it was okay for the Chic CEO to turn away the guys from her event, then alright, we can disagree and you are consistent in your views.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 05:13 PM
1

Thats also a modeling job; Generally modeling jobs are exempt from those laws due to their nature.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 05:10 PM
12

I actually think him getting the fine that he did was absolutely what should happen. he was refusing someone services based on their gender. If he had refused her due to her requesting a type of haircut that they did not provide, that is one thing, but solely based on her being a woman and wanting it to be a "guy-space" is not acceptable. Just last week, most here seemed to agree with me, that the CEO of Chic Women, who turned down 3 men from entering her "Women-in-Tech" event and was subsequent…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:14 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/UpliftingNews/comments/3jsoqx/a_california_moving_company_will_move_domestic/cus3gjx
/r/MensRights06/09/15 08:36 PM
2

yeah the "real men" comment is still shit, even if they help men, but just figured to give credit where credit is due :)
/r/MensRights06/09/15 07:44 PM
6

They have come out here on reddit to directly state that they also help male victims move out tho
/r/MensRights06/09/15 07:07 PM
3

you replace the "www" part of the link with "np", then it leads to a no participation version of the website, so that people don't end up posting there by mistake and get (shadow)bans for briganding
/r/MensRights06/09/15 07:06 PM
1

Interesting read. Had to report due to lack of NP in the link (see sidebar) but I think you should resubmit it
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:22 PM
0

Sorry, this is just more of your delusional bullshit from before. Stairs into a bus represent an obstacle in order to access the service of the bus ride, so we build an access point for someone in a wheelchair to assure equal access to the service, regardless of their handicap, just like we don't charge the males or females, blacks or whites, abled or disable, different rates for the transportation service. There might be a discount for senior citizens or for children, but again, such things app…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 09:48 AM
1

so is it discrimination if someone puts on a showing of some kind of authentic kabuki theater, and when they are hiring a producer they favor the kabuki expert from japan over some guy that studied foreign theater from america? No, as that is a matter of hiring based upon relevant skill, and not at all the same situation in any way, that you think they are in any way the same is just outright delusional and insane. you seem to have a really too rigid definition of discrimination. just like the f…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 09:45 AM
14

Well, their point is good. No matter how much "its too many" views we share, because I think that 1 man commiting suicide is too many, they was commenting not on the rate or quantity itself of men commiting suicide, but that given that the UK did not have out-of-control rates of suicide (which, as the 105th rank in the world, they fortunately don't), that suicide is the leading cause of death means that other causes of death are lower. They not saying it is good that men commit suicide nor that …
/r/MensRights06/09/15 09:14 AM
1

Congratulations, you was able to, like a parrot, restate the argument previously said, which I already said does not matter in whatever or not this is discrimination.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 09:10 AM
1

You got to explain how they are identical; You keep saying that her and your argument are objectively identifical without breaking them down and demonstrating it, does not an argument make, that makes it an unproved claim of yours. Also, his actions had a victim, abortion doesn't
/r/MensRights06/09/15 08:48 AM
1

No saying that companies doesn't have incentives to enact these discriminatory policies, obviously there are incentives to make them, otherwise they wouldn't make them. I also know nightclubs who holds ladies nights (the type with free entrance for women, and perhaps even increased prices over normal ones for men) see a spike in male visitors on those nights, but it is still discrimination and I am against it
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:18 AM
1

Why it matters that the redditor was pro-death is because that is the basis of the hypocrisy of her argument. Feminism is for the most part, synonymous with pro-fetal-murder. And in the case of this particular one, is an objective fact. The hypocrisy begins to emerge because, with feminists, any attempt to debate this is rejected out of hand, with non-objective, emotional pleas. Starting out your paragraph by phrasing pro-abortion as "pro-death" and then attacking others for making non-objective…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:14 AM
5

Im just tired of seeing the "its to attract more women" excuse being given to nightclubs and dating services, as if that somehow making gendered discriminations okay or something to be tolerated; That it somehow benefits men. All cases of [gendered] discrimination can be phrased into a narrative to make it an advantage for the one discriminated if you twist it enough. Yes, men are paid more pr. hour, but its because we know families need a certain income to keep their lifestyles, so its an incen…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:59 AM
2

https://np.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/2yojfb/til_circumcision_can_reduce_the_chances_of/ Was considering taking some of this stuff in here, but the comment thread from last this was posted so throughly debunk everything in it, I think just linking it is best
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:31 AM
5

Not really facts, as almost everything in it is heavily disputed by all non-american health organisations in the western world EDIT: Also, been on reddit for about an hour and spammed nothing, but circumcision links in new threads and comments. Spam-bot?
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:26 AM
9

Senior Citizen discounts apply equally across all races, genders, sexualities, religions and so forth, so thats up to each establishment to decide. Gendered discrimination is equally wrong when it happens to men as when it happens to women, preventing equal access to services provided by a company, be it a nightclub holding a ladies night or a dating app charging only male customers for their service.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:14 AM
2

I don't see the problem with this. They are not claiming only women are able to help save the environment nor making it into a gendered issue. What I see them doing, is using targetted marketing to reach a certain demographic in the battle for saving the environment to make a better more focused effort to actually reach people. Not at all a men's rights issue
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:09 AM
8

Discrimination is discrimination
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:05 AM
2

Can't see what this has to do with men's rights nor where this redditor states she is a feminist nor pro-abortion, nor how that matters. Also the two situations, sex with a minor and pregnancy are not equal to each other; I support abortion, but do not support sexual intercourse with a minor. I personally believe there should be age-proximity clauses added to the existing consent laws, but that has nothing to do with that this redditor said in the comment you linked. EDIT: also reported due to l…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 12:56 AM
5

Can you please explain what you going on about? I cannot find anything about what you talking about from your link and your title is confusing as all hell
/r/MensRights05/09/15 11:39 PM
1

you replace the "www" part of the link with "np", its short for "no participation", so when people forget how they came to the thread and want to reply to a comment, they get a warning that they got there through a no participation link. This is to prevent briganding and people from being flagged as briganding on threads in other subforums. If you found to be briganding, you can get shadowbanned across the entirety of reddit
/r/MensRights05/09/15 11:20 PM
1

Ah, wasn't sure if report went to moderators or admins, thus the previous message. Will use report in the future
/r/MensRights05/09/15 09:22 PM
1

paging /u/sillymod for not using np link (hope I don't get sanctioned for posting before I remembered I came from here :( )
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:40 PM
21

From the released description of events, she is much more suspecious than the man; Trying to get emotionally involved with a 12yo stranger? A man who did the same would be the subject of an investigation, judging by their reaction to one simply asking directions
/r/MensRights05/09/15 04:12 PM
1

Already been posted with imgur caption of the police status update.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 09:34 AM
135

Found it and yes, yes they are ridiculing it, some of the best comments, in my opinion why? what did he do? Very first comment so someone asked for directions and went on their way? He asked for directions then left. Where in this article does it say he followed her??? I'm confused .... crime rate on the rise!!! I really feel sorry for innocent people who ask for help these days. Am I missing something. The man asked for directions. Is that a criminal offence? That's the last time He'll ask for …
/r/MensRights05/09/15 09:32 AM
1

I think we lost that a year or 2 back, if you're thinking about the happiness index EDIT: And will also need to add, to be clear, that the words in danish don't include style, but when directly translated is just "men-cut" and "women-cut", so I heard some still complain about the gendered prices, and wouldn't be surprised if some salons try and charge the higher woman price for short haired women getting their hair done, but the law is clear they can demand the lower price if they got the short …
/r/MensRights04/09/15 03:05 PM
11

I know that saloons for haircuts here in Denmark don't list one price for women and one for men, but instead one price for a male-style-haircut and one for a woman-style-haircut, so the length of your hair ends up determining the costs, as a long hair man or woman will require much more work than a short haired man or woman. They used to list male and female prices, but that changed due to a discriminatory lawsuit some years back EDIT: And I agree, different prices based on gender is bad, differ…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 06:40 AM
1

Absolutely agree with that. I generally only see people who think it is a one way-street and that it is not possible, call it "reverse sexism/racism"
/r/MensRights03/09/15 01:54 PM
5

This hits home a lot for me, professionally. I am a pedagogue (yes, I know how dangerous a job it is for man, working with children and everything), and here in Denmark, pedagogues are also associated with the care of the mentally disabled, which at times includes dementia. During our education, we had 3 periods of interning (2 x 6 months, 1 x 3 months), and had a few days back at school during those periods to catch up and work through experiences learned with each other. During one of those 6 …
/r/MensRights03/09/15 12:38 PM
10

The next part is even more mind buggling, total #HeForShe bullshit, basically shes going "We don't discriminate against men! We totally want them aid and support us and be on our side!" And the article seems to conclude that the law is outdated.... this is some "there is no such thing as reverse sexism/racism"-bullshit
/r/MensRights03/09/15 05:15 AM
2

If you and your BF are willing to help your brother with (intense, as you called it) therapy and a place to live, give him that offer as you are bringing this stuff up in person, as others have said. Insist that he sees a therapist about this; He will either have issues which lead to his inappropriate behavior OR he will need both your emotional support and some professional help to make sure he does not blame himself for being unfairly accused of this inappropriate behavior; Give him the help a…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:56 AM
18

Alternative #100: I can make this list, without being personally attacked, called a misogynist or a cry-baby and have my social status vehemently devalued
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:59 AM
3

Aye, I did not check the research to a degree where I could comment on it being the cause of the popularity of feminism or the bias is the result of feminism; Cause and effect can often be switched if the testing parameters doesn't somehow control for them But the research, as I recall, said a significantly larger share of women had preferences for their own group than males, not all females, so it could still be biological without it conflicting with female MRAs/anti-feminists, they just belong…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 05:30 PM
8

This causes closed-feminism to be a de-facto hate movement when you consider that women seem more inclined to view the situation as misogyny, and men more inclined to view the situation as misandry. Because of this, and because of feminists hostility to anyone who doesn't accept their perspective, men are driven out of the discussion on gender equality, and because of feminisms perspective, many issues that effect men go ignored or undiscovered. For this part, it could actually be argued that wo…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 05:00 PM
10

Well she did dichotomy the world into black and white people only, as she did not only reject black men, but also said she was exclusively for white men. Also there is the whole "I am the catch" attitude, like she is super desireable. So its not really apt to compare it to a white man who doesn't like black girls, its more to be compared to an overweight out of shape white man publically posting "Sorry black girls, only white women can satisfy this stud!" and yeah, that guy would get slaughtered…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/15 07:42 AM
6

There is a lot of assumptions people make in regard to these kind of relationships, primarily that the woman is abusing the older male for his fortune, just "sticking it out" for a few years until the older male dies so she can gain his wealth. Related to so belief would be the case of "Janni Brodersen" from Denmark. In 1983 she married Simon Spies of "Spies Rejser", she was then 20 years old and Simon Spies was 61 years old. Within 1 year of their marriage, Simon Spies died and with her inherit…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:20 AM
3

If his joke accused half the population, then her accusation was also accusing half the population. The half that is already disproportionately jailed for a longer time than the other and disproportionately falsely accused of rape. Get your head out of your ass
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:38 AM
1

Should be said that in this case, she did not name anyone, just claimed an incident did happen [with a or some strangers] While false rape claims are bad, those targetting someone specific is a lot worse than just falsely claiming to been raped by someone you didn't know.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 10:19 PM
5

[Translation] Yesterday several danish media wrote about a 17 year old girl, who had told police in Sønderborg that she had been felts up by unknown perpetrators and subject to sexual abuse. It turns out, however, that the accusation was false and today, Thursday the 13th of August, the young girl admits she was lying. On hearing this, Brian Mørk went to his keyboard "Is this becoming a rite of passage in young girls road to becoming adult women?" He wrote on his facebook page, where he also sha…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 09:02 PM
1

You do realize, when you keep saying "you" in your replies, that I am not OP?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:13 PM
1

Not according to me; I am speaking about stereotypes. I will assume that neither you nor I am going to claim that being a Redneck means someone is a racist. Is the stereotype of Rednecks being gay-hating racist unfair? Absolutely. Do you deny that it is a stereotype tho?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:10 PM
3

Neither are all feminists man-hating "#KillAllMen" supporters; This is about stereotyping and it's affect on people. A black person feeling discriminated against and wanting change is not likely to seek out people fitting the racist redneck stereotype in looks and presentation for allies and help, even if said rednecks, despite apperance, is extremely progressive minded and inclusive with no shred of racism in them. Likewise, a man feeling discriminated against is not likely to go to groups labe…
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:02 AM
1

No "getting out the jumper cables", the simulator disappoints
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/15 05:49 AM
1

+/u/User_Simulator /u/rogersimon10
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/15 08:29 PM
7

It might also be due to algorithms rather than a conscious decision by anyone, i.e. if out of 100 men browsing the men's section to then search for "rings", 90 select the women's engagement ring results, those will be displayed first to anyone else searching it, as the computers calculations on previous shoppers says thats the most likely item they are looking for. EDIT: Striked out "men", as who is browsing the men's section wouldn't matter to an algorithm
/r/MensRights09/08/15 03:25 AM
1

Omg, you walked to the kitchen this morning!?!? Good on you!!! :)
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:55 PM
1

Absolutely. http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2012/05/15/intelligence-report-article-provokes-outrage-among-mens-rights-activists/ This is the article SPLC posted as a follow up, which lead to the daily dot correcting themselves (notice how my source was posted after your original opinion source, and how they also mention that in my source) They are still obviously biased, basically their defense for labelling some MRM members as extremists, while not doing the same for feminists, boils down to how …
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:07 AM
3

Now now, lets not continue the misinformation from feminist/the media, lets quote: "It's false. We wrote about the subreddit Mens Rights, but we did not list it as a hate group . . . "In almost all cases, we list hate groups at the end of each calendar year when we publish lists. I very much doubt we would ever list the Reddit [r/MensRights] in question—it's a diverse group, which certainly does include some misogynists—but I don't think that's [its basic] purpose. Source: https://archive.is/201…
/r/MensRights22/07/15 06:26 PM
1

It still shows up in your history; Deleting it simply unlists it, but it still actually exist at the same url and in your posting history
/r/MensRights19/07/15 05:37 PM
-5

Why did you repost this? You either deleted your last absolutely identical post yourself, in which case you want to repost it due to the negative feedback and score you got; Or one of the mods deleted it, in which case reposting it is even worse
/r/MensRights19/07/15 04:48 PM
1

Alright, I stand corrected then; Figured it was any account identifiable outside of reddit
/r/MensRights19/07/15 04:46 PM
1

You need to censor out the usernames, as to avoid claims of us (/r/mensrights) encouraging harassment, should some misguided soul decide to contact her about it. EDIT: Paging /u/sillymod to remove this, so it can be resubmitted with censor-bars
/r/MensRights19/07/15 04:10 PM
3

I can follow dress codes being different in some aspects between the genders. I had an experience like this myself which angered me tho: I had a shoulder-bag (yeah, I used to think those was the shit), basically a man-purse. Was told by bouncer that I had put it in the paid-to-store wardrope at the club due to how it was possible to sneak in drugs in such a bag otherwise. So I did without much objections, figuring it was due to it's size.. Then I entered the club and all ladies had their purses …
/r/MensRights19/07/15 09:13 AM
8

I don't know if this is an international thing, but last I checked Tinder, which I infrequently do, more than half of the girls there list their height, often accompanied with instructions not to bother if you are not as tall or higher. And men are supposedly the shallow ones
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:39 PM
3

You don't really explain why you want to use "knight" instead of "white knight", instead just go into how you want to use your new shorter term "knight" I object to your notion, because I see no reason why we should not used the established terminology here
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/15 10:14 PM
2

Your reply has since been deleted, and you did not use the NP link format, so I guess your post will be removed from here too
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:18 PM
5

I think those comments are disgusting and reflect to a gender double standard towards men; If a male teacher had sex with a 16 year old female student and two 17 year old female students of his, nobody would be talking about how lucky they was,how "perfectly natural" it was or how he was not a "sexual predator" due to age of consent being 16 (which doens't matter when you are in a position of trust and authority as a teacher, at least as long as the students are below 18). I think her sentencing…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 01:43 PM
1

Won't that vary from district to district a lot? My father works at a large company as a department boss (don't know correct translation of his title), and has over the years been the boss of several different departments. When he was in charge of the service department, which has a lot of mechanical engineers on staff, he noticed that 4 out of 5 of them had nurses as girlfriends/wives and almost all he interviewed for new positions fit that pattern as well. Turns out, the nearest place for them…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 08:17 AM
10

next comeback to her should be (in my mind) Woman and Man about to engage in Sex Woman says she is on pill, man still puts on a condom Condom breaks, woman gets pregnant Man doesn't want baby Woman decides she wants baby Man is on the hook financially until his unwanted child is 18. Reproductive rights?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:09 PM
3

He also claims many are jumping ship, more so than he has ever witnessed before... Did any subreddits related to men's rights actually experience a decrease in memberships as a result of this ruling?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 02:59 PM
5

Without adressing the multitude of other problems with the comic (many having been adressed by others here already) one interesting fault/double standard is revealed in "the math" section, if you accept the logic until that point. They "conclude" that this all means society has a view that "Woman-things are bad". I'll disagree. If the above is true, then the conclusion based on what is presented is that cross-gender-emotions are bad. They have 4 emotions, claiming confidence and anger as being m…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 11:31 PM
15

I think the most interesting part is how the change in definition only allowed to count male victims of other men, but still excludes females as offenders, unless they penetrate an opening (with a digit or foreign object); Males having sex without consent is still not rape under the new defintion that feminists want us to celebrate NOW for campaigning
/r/MensRights02/07/15 03:42 PM
6

Should also be taken into account that outside the USA, with its cultural heritage of circumcision, all research points towards circumcision having absolutely no benefit regarding STDs. But somehow the American doctors who are circumcised themselves in large proportions seems to find this, when nobody else can. Wonder if there is a bias or agenda there. EDIT: Also worth noticing that while the opposite claim could be made about European doctors, our health sector is structured in such a way, in …
/r/MensRights28/06/15 12:16 AM
1

Bahar Mustafa. UK diversity officer and feminist, banned white cis males from participating in an event, reference males as allies, specially non-PoC males, and allies only.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 07:27 AM
1

I'll add to that list, in respect to being part of the work force, that it is still socially acceptable many place (its pretty common) that some jobs are to be performed by male employees, while the same standard is not acceptable towards women. For instance: Men are often still asked to lift/move heavy objects, specially when it is not a standard part of the work. The "Some of the men need to come down and help carry the new tables and chairs up the stairs" should provoke, but doesn't, the same…
/r/MensRights27/06/15 07:24 AM
3

I see the split being in that Mens Rights is regarding legal issues, discrimination and double standards based upon gender, while sexual strategies would fall under the umbrella of "self-improvement" to me, which also happens to be an area where men are subjected to double standards; A woman reading an article about how to "get the perfect man" is totally normal and accepted. I think we all seen women's magazines featuring lists such as "10 ways to attract Mr. Perfect". Much of the same style of…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:49 PM
5

I just object to the notion of something not generally needing sources due to being "common knowledge", no matter what the claim is or who makes it; I want the MRM to be better than just making claims without sources: What is claimed without evidence, can be rejected without evidence Ironically forgotten source
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:38 PM
2

I am not sure why you coming here with such hostility? You first claim you want the MRM to work more with Red Pillers, which I see as a fine point; There are certainly overlaps in interests in some areas, even if there are parts of your philosophies and theories we can not all agree with, that doesn't negate the areas where we share common goals and interests. Do you claim that all "Red Pill Articles" are relevant for Men's Rights? That was my objection to the OP, that she equated Red Pill Artic…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:34 PM
2

I seen about equal quantities of "giving the others shit" from both Mens Rights and Red Pillers. And regarding Elliot Rodgers, as far as my understanding is, he was part of some Red Pill groups, and that lead to accusations against MRAs that he was an MRA, to which they responded he was not MRA, he was Red Pill, and that counts as MRAs throwing Red Pills under the bus... how?
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:27 PM
2

Any sources? Just for future references
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:24 PM
0

I'm doing this mainly because I'm really, really bored. Also, because I'm super curious as to what MRA's think. I could read Red Pill articles all I want, but that's not the same as talking to an actual MRA and seeing what a person actually thinks. Same with feminism, same with religion, same with anything, really. Nothing beats hearing a first-person perspective. So, let's get talking about different perspectives on gender! AMA, and I will ask you something back. I will not be judgmental toward…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:52 PM
1

I am going to hope/assume you are not limiting each of us to 1 question each (i don't know what is standard rules for AMA's to be honest, I like reading them, not usually ask questions) Do you, as a feminist, see a need/justification for the existance of the Mens Rights Movement?
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:21 PM
1

And it is not like whatever he said is outdated, even if it was (and I am not saying it was) correct at the time he said it, his death was over 20 years ago now.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:18 PM
8

You reference "Red Pill articles" in your post, so I will start by asking if you equate the red pill movement and the men's rights movement with each other? Just asking as the majority opinion on both subreddits (red pill and mens rights) seems to be negative towards each other, I always find it amusing when feminists falsely equate them
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:13 PM
3

Depends entirely upon what the purpose of the "Interview" (why the quotation marks around that word in the thread title?) is. You mention his support for GamerGate, which is not by its core nature connected to the Mens Rights Movement, but there has been some overlap between the communities, mainly due to how many feminist organisations and speakers has shown same patterns of dishonest representation of both MRM and GamerGate to paint both as misogynistic hate-groups. I'd strongly suggest only b…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 07:29 AM
3

Please don't make clickbait titles; This has nothing to do with official youtube stance on feminism
/r/MensRights22/06/15 10:17 PM
1

Was just about to submit this one, was going to title it "Reply in AskReddit thread about 'Fathers Who Abandoned Their Families' demonstrates why the MRM is needed"
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:18 PM
-2

Absolutely agree that this is not mens rights related.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:33 AM
5

/r/awww
/r/MensRights22/06/15 08:04 AM
5

Thank you! I had often read those questions, thinking to myself "no way thats real" But now I know for certain that they was indeed real and not fake! Much appreciated, kind stranger!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/15 07:56 AM
1

If that is indeed true, it is an important statistic to put forth; I just think the image being discussed here fails by only bringing forth the weaker part of the related statistics
/r/MensRights14/06/15 02:30 PM
0

Without throughoutly fact-checking, some concerns I have regarding some of the final statistics: 85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders comes from fatherless homes. Now, without knowing the % of children from fatherless homes and motherless homes respectively who exhibit behavioral disorders, this statistic is pretty meaningless. Lets make a fictional example with some made up numbers to demonstrate why the above percentages would be needed for it to be truly interesting Lets say …
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:34 AM
1

Today/Recent I Actually Learned - TRIAL - [Insert fact] Seems legit
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:50 AM
11

Oh, I understand you being happy and absolutely congratulate you on being free of that nightmare. It just really shows how prevailant and horrible the pussy pass is, if your case is not considered pussy pass being granted, is all I am saying
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/15 07:59 AM
43

I think it is a poor state of things that having a bunch of fake charges dropped after 2 years of probation is a "win" against the pussy pass. her pussy pass was very much granted, as she wasn't arrested and sentences for her domestic violence
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/15 08:45 PM
4

Bit old, but a great article, thanks for reposting. It is a class example of how the non-physical types of domestic violence is often accepted if the aggressor is female and a woman finally realizing it is not okay, which is great. Love the author
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:31 AM
7

The Mens Rights movement is not against Mad Max. For true ELI5: See kid, there is this group of people, who like to call themselves journalists, who do not understand a single thing about research, so when a site for men, who has previously detested The Mens Rights Movement as losers, went out and said Mad Max was a horrible film, due to the websites degrading view on women, these so-called journalists decided to describe the website in question as representative of the Mens Rights Movement, des…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:24 PM
5

I actually think you got this backwards. Yes, there is a large overlap between MensRights and KiA subreddit, but I am strongly under the impression that it is the non-overlapping members of KiA, who are posting the MensRights topics. We basically have 3 groups of people Group A) Members of both MensRights and Kia Group B) Members of only KiA Group C) Members of only MensRights. Right away, we can eliminate Group C is the ones posting the topics. Group B, if finding a MensRights topic unrelated t…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 11:40 AM
3

Firstly it needs to be said that SJWs and Feminists are not synonyms; There exist entirely reasonable sections and groups of feminists out there and judging your schools feminist club as being of the bad kind prior to engaging with them and seeing what positions they take on various issues would be an unwise idea and will only aid in existing polarization between the MRM and feminists (the reasonable kind). Also disproving and countering their arguments and falsehoods is best not done by going t…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:16 PM
1

Seen a video like that (but can't find it either), I remember it being by a public pool or beach through and not in a park. EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cGL31qBbY0 Here it is, starting at 0:26
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:41 PM
2

Depends entirely upon which country it happens in. And will add that I don't know about the UK, where this instance did happen, but in Denmark newspapers don't make public the photo and names of those accused of a crime (except when it is a famous/public person, then some times) But personally I was unaware of how the American press has no problems posting pictures and names of people accused of rapes and other horrible crimes until about a year ago, where the Danish press reported about how a D…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:45 PM
14

It always seemed to me that the more eager people are to call others close minded the more the chance of them themselves being close minded approaches 100%
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:52 AM
2

The article is about rape in Norway, but it would be stupid to think US statistics doesn't apply Absolutely disagree. The cultural differences when it comes to crime and investigations by police are vastly different in the scandinavian countries and in America, and the feminist cultures are also vastly different, which will all influence the statistics you get. You can still use it, but be cautious about assuming that if it is 10% in the United States, then it will also be 10% in Norway. And eit…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:28 PM
6

Foreskin : 20,000 nerve endings Clitoris: 8,000 nerve endings The penis itself: 4,000 nerve endings This obviously oversimplifies things, as not all nerve endings are equally sensitive, but just saying...
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:13 PM
2

how are we supposed to support this claim with a source, given how your article for a Norwegian newspaper is supposedly based around statistics from Norway, rather than using American or UK based statistics, given all the cultural difference between the Norway and those countries, which would mean that statistics of cultural trends taken from America, for instance, cannot be directly applied to how things are in Norway. You could, possibly, be writing an article regarding rape culture in the Uni…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:09 PM
4

I think this is a end to a line of thought in the creators head that he failed to convey to others, so it is utter nonsense to the rest of us
/r/MensRights02/05/15 05:49 PM
16

It is also a fundamental misunderstanding of the Mens Rights Movement to think that we work under the assumption that no discrimination happens to women. I'll wager that the strong majority, above 90%, of those connected to the Mens Rights Movement will acknowledge that discrimination happens to women, which is more than you can say about most feminists movements/organisations, of which some of the top members will happily claim sexism cannot happen to men by changing the definition of sexism to…
/r/MensRights02/05/15 02:37 PM
4

And it has been deleted....
/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:08 AM
15

Absolutely agree with the girls that those posters seem highly inappropriate and sexist in the same way as #HeForShe
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:55 PM
2

Should get more upvotes! We got to avoid the pitfalls we have seen other movements (many feminist organisations comes to mind) dvelve into, such as having a bias and an assumed conclusion prior to reviewing the evidence. 1in3 could indeed be a wrong statistic, and if evidence shows that reality is perhaps 1in5 instead, then we should change and adapt, instead of assuming the new evidence is wrong! That this article happens to be a pile of shit, doesn't mean we should assume that prior to reviewi…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 03:07 PM
2

The mens' rights organization believes the male accuser is innocent until proven guilty, well that means the victim regardless if male or female is guilty until proven innocent No, NO, NOO! Read up on false dichotomy, cause that seems to be the logical fallacy you are employing in this above example. Presumption of innocence for the person accused of a crime does not mean presumption of guilt for the person making the accusation. Until the charges are proven, someone who is accused of rape (or a…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 05:32 AM
2

Just imagine a dad slapping his rioting daughter in the same way... yeah, he wouldn't get called "a hero" in a news article
/r/MensRights28/04/15 12:19 PM
-22

Nice concept and a lot of work, but you have done too much editorializing and commenting on your own points throughout for it to be in any way clear or concise regarding what lies she has told. Much better formatting would have been On [date of interview] with [who interviewed her] Sulkowicz claimed [claim she made as a direct quote from her, which also links to the article the claim comes from] The now revealed data shows that [fact that contradicts the claim as a quote] And let that be it. Cur…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:11 PM
1

Nice find, but you forgot to use np.reddit.com to link to the thread. Do not comment in the thread linked, it can get you banned
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:14 AM
1

No apology needed (really, I find it kinda weird that you saying sorry, actually :) ), people miss things all the time, and asking a question is always okay :)
/r/MensRights26/04/15 09:30 PM
3

Rules of this subreddit; Leaving user-ID can lead to mods removing your posts
/r/MensRights26/04/15 09:15 PM
7

It sounds like you have only heard, until now, from the femnists spin and hate machine, which will vastly distort the reality of the MRA, because we represent a threat to their authority on gender issues and their continued denial of being "the establishment" now. I myself found the MRA by going here to see "the insane nutcases" that feminists kept talking about, so I'll recommend doing what I did: Read through the posts here and the comments, and I'll bet you will find that 99% of everything ba…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 04:27 PM
11

This, so much this! A few days before the wedding, in a land in which she doesn't have a visa or a place to live besides with her husband to be, he drops this on her. That is very different from how it should be done: Months prior (so all guests can be informed in good time without too much embarassment, how embarassing would it have been if her parents was already on a plane to come attend the wedding?) and if she is from another country, then, if at all possible, mention the prenup prior to he…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:01 AM
4

A suggestion for your new sub (which I think is a good idea and subscribing already): Make a, perhaps monthly, summarization of the rape hoaxes exposed on the sub, which lists the past (not just past month, as in ALL the hoaxes from the subreddits history), but only list each individual false accusation once with a news article link. Otherwise, people might disregard the validity of the sub exposing the myth of "almost no false rape accusations" because, if it goes anything like on /r/mensrights…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/15 09:27 AM
1

You might want to peek over to /r/femradebates, just beware that it is NOT a forum anyone can post in, you need to message moderators, get flair and permission before joining the posts and/or comments
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:56 AM
8

I don't know if you are new here, but from my experience, this issue is brought up quite frequently here on this subreddit; There are rarely any posts solely dedicated to it, but the nature of Reddit is that things that is related to news, gets posted, and there has not been any news related to the draft in a long time, so you only see the draft thing mentioned in meta-posts and comments.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:09 PM
5

Radical Feminism: Where males having sex against their will or their consent is not rape, as it is only rape when there is penetration, otherwise we are demeaning the value of the word rape. But if you are female, your father slapping your mother infront of you, it is rape! If you are female, your mother calling another girl a slut, it is rape! If you are female and your brother teases another girl, it is rape! If you are female, thoughts, words and looks can rape you! But if you are a man, reme…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:06 PM
3

Alright, will take a go at this: Firstly, her definition of what the MRA is, a cult mainly and solely focused on opposion feminism is grossly misrepresentative of what the Mens Rights Movement is all about, but we will let that fly for now, but I got a feeling her faulty definition will probarly have a role to play later on. 1) Chivalry [is] Not Dead The whole idea of MRAs being suck-ups, calling their girlfriends (or casual hook-ups, its not clearly stated which she means in this video) for M'l…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 12:03 PM
9

I wish there was/will come audio from the encounter with the cop to back up the claim that it was the Expo itself that called the police.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:15 PM
1

I'd suggest basing each comic on a current point they are trying to make and include at the bottom of each comic a link to the article or post in question which actually says "these things", so when they try and claim "no feminist would say these things", its very simple to go "Well, not only will they, they already have, right here!"
/r/MensRights20/04/15 08:49 AM
1

Would you please be so kind, next time, to specify in your reply that you are talking about the OP and not the person you are replying to (which would be me here). I know its not intentional, just worried your reply could be read as talking about me. Im well over 15 and never been abusive on any website (and I am actually a member on SCP, altho, never made it past the sandbox)
/r/MensRights19/04/15 02:34 AM
2

You might want to chose a game engine on which to develop your game, such as Unity3D and go to their specific subreddit and look up some guides, do's and don't regarding game design. Also look at the competition that exist and what they are doing, both to monetize and to draw players into playing repeatedly in the game and don't just look up shooters, look at the most successful games regardless of their type and try and find common themes or interesting mechanics that will draw players to retur…
/r/MensRights18/04/15 07:27 PM
2

It needs to have something original both in terms of gameplay and content in order for it to really stick out and take a share of the market for itself and thus be profitable.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 07:23 PM
5

Sure, if you know how to make addictive gameplay without going way too offensive with your themes, i.e. go anti-feminist sure, but make sure its productive and not just hating on feminism senselessly. You'd need to make a more concrete idea both for the theme and for what the game would include than what you posted here so far
/r/MensRights18/04/15 06:20 PM
2

Sorry, but that is just bullshit what you saying now. I'd love to see you substantialize the claim that men are able to choose which to prioritize more so than women in our modern society. How does society makes it unaffordable for women, but affordable for men? Are you going to go full wage gap myth on us now? Fact is, women are not paid less pr. hours work in the same professions with same experience as their male coworkers, they are only overall earning less due to less working hours and diff…
/r/MensRights18/04/15 02:47 AM
2

And which would you objectively say is more important for a human being of either gender: Having money or spending time with their loved ones? Men get to spend a lot less time with their families (which is also why they earn more money). Obviously if you choose money as the measuring stick you get the results you do; Im telling you that the selection of money as the measuring stick is done due to an inherent sexism in feminism
/r/MensRights18/04/15 01:40 AM
3

How is that more of a problem than men being told, explicitly and implicitly, that nursing jobs are not for boys? EDIT: You must not take this as saying we should not encourage women to work in STEM, I am simply saying feminism has a tendency to only define something as a problem if it affects girls, i.e. the above about boys not going into nurturing fields is not seen as nearly as important a problem as girls not going into STEM, and that shows a heavy bias and sexism inherent in much of femini…
/r/MensRights18/04/15 12:53 AM
3

Why is more men studying a certain subject than women a problem? That is the feminist narrative, that more men in STEM than women is a problem, yet, the moment it is more women than men, it is not a problem? That seems inheriently sexist to me to have such a double standard
/r/MensRights17/04/15 10:37 PM
4

It is a shitstorm, go on twitter and look up #ExpoEquality and the shit @CalgeryExpo is pulling atm. Basically Honey badgers joked a month ago about how they infiiltrated nerd culture by being nerds for the last decade, and the expo took that as evidence they was actually just posing to infiltrate the expo.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 10:29 PM
4

Absolutely should some of those be adressed. I come from Denmark and we have some of their parental leave earmarked for the fathers, which has greatly helped overcome some of the taboo regarding men taking time of work to take care of their newborn babies. A larger portion is earmarked mothers and the vast majority of it is in a shared pool that the mother and father can decide to share between them as they see fit. Mothers still, on average, take a lot more of the parental leave, but it has eve…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 10:09 PM
7

I'll jump in and clearly state that I firmly believe feminist movements are so investing in their "revolutionary underdog" narrative and idea, that they will actively oppose to acknowledge the reality, which is, feminism is now the establishment. They are setting the public opinion on things now and are in absolute power when it comes to gender issues politically, and yet, men's shelters can't get government funding, while women's shelters are instantly approved. I don't think there needs to be …
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:42 PM
1

Almost forgot: NOW opposing shared parenting and other feminist organisations track record: http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/opposing-shared-parenting-the-feminist-track-record/
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:40 PM
2

In my opinion, they can stop the double-talk and thoughtcrime policing they have been doing, i.e. holding certain opinions as invalid and their active campaigns to misrepresent MRAs. They should start identifying and acknowledge the double standards within their own group and start being open to actual critical voices of their views and ideas; Even if they disagree with the critical voices, actually responding to them with facts instead of belittlement, as seems to be the standard at the moment,…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:37 PM
2

Now, I love feminism, let me say that right of the bat. What I loath and hate is the modern feminist organisations and third-wave feminists and also the blind-spots of ignorance of men's issues they have and how they are actively hurting men due to their ignorance (and in some cases arrogance) Have you seen posters with following lines from feminist organisations? "End domestic violence against women" "End rape against women" "Real men don't hit girls!" I have, and I got to ask, why do any of th…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:19 PM
56

I also like how the girl in red is like "She took my spot, oh well, I'll just go somewhere else then" without a care in the world
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/15 10:37 AM
9

Sorry, the moment the "HIStory" comment was made, I couldn't take that person intellectually serious anymore and ended up zoning out, as thats as pathetic as it comes
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:51 PM
3

Just got to say how happy I am to see that the wife who made the plan actually got a more severe punishment (9 years) than the man she talked into doing the attack (7 years). I usually see a tendency that its usually the male, no matter if he is the "planning mastermind" or the "executer", of a crime duo that gets the hardest punishment, so glad to see this case broke that pattern, and rightfully so
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:01 AM
1

Interesting. Your 3rd screenshot cuts out the top question tho, remember what it was?
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:42 AM
1

Thats a very misleading way to present this case. The problem and reason the school district was sued was due to their inactions when the girls brought the problem (their nudes being shared on the school) to the attention of the adults, who was supposed to be responsible, but instead told them to "suck it up". And thats simply not an okay response to do to such a problem where they have responsibility.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 05:58 AM
1

Watch the video linked in this submission from this subreddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/32i6ro/rapegate_the_truth_about_rape/ In it he actually cites a lot of statistics and mention where they are from, which will greatly help building an argument for your case. Also telling us all where you are from and if your essay is supposed to focus on local culture only or international culture would be helpful, i.e. if you are American and its American culture only, then mentioning how…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 04:09 AM
2

I don't understand how people can be nasty in other ways on the streets. I have seen my friends point to larger people, and call them fat. I've even had someone tell me that 'that won't fit you, and if you buy it, you can't return it' (for the record... It was baggy on me when I tried it on). I have had a friend call me a bitch on the bus just because essentially they were a bully and wanted to hurt my feelings (they did). In these instances people have told me to 'grow a thicker skin'. And in m…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 03:49 AM
3

I'll do something very atypical of me here and defend your feminist friends, at least to some degree. Now, I don't belive we live in a rape culture nor that street harassment should be a high priority issue, but I do believe it to be an issue and not equal to those other examples of rude actions you listed. They are not equal as the other rude actions fall into a different dynamic than cat-calling. Cutting in line, interrupting you at the register (assuming another customer interrupting to ask t…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:37 AM
3

There is a lot of information in the sidebar and must also state that while everybody who is active on this subreddit supports the Mens Right Movement, views of various issues and their importance compared to each other varies greatly from between each individual here, but I'll try and give you an answer from my own perspective. Mens Right Movements could correctly be identified as a counter movement to feminism, this does not mean we are opposed to suffrage and other woman's right issues from t…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:11 AM
3

While the quotes might come from here, the infographic does not give any information regarding their status with up/down votes, which would reflect how well or ill received those opinions was in general on this subreddit. Also, the bit.ly link given as a source in the inforgraphic does not seem to work for me, making one unable to verify the claims of the infographic or check something such as up/down votes in case it was supposed to be a screenshot of the comments. Add to that, with the title o…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 10:31 PM
3

Also, from the care of the childrens point of view, this actually also makes a lot of sense. It just have to be done right/gradually, cause as long as the cultural mentality goes against it, it can cause issues with men chosing to take their paternity leave (in a sense, im both for and against it being forced, don't think you should decide what others have to or don't have to do unless it is vital, but also realize that as long as it is voluntary, a lot of men won't take it, even if they really …
/r/MensRights12/04/15 07:53 AM
30

Alright, I'll give my counter points to some of those: 1) Firstly, with the 1,500 people killed in murder-suicides each year, even if they are spread out to 1 pr. instance and 100% of all murder-suicides are men, that only brings the statistics down to 25,210 males vs 5,700 females killing themselves in suicides each year, and saying that men are socialized in a different way and as such succed more often in suicides doesn't really change the point that this is a gender issue, it actually reenfo…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 04:10 PM
7

I can! :) Anyway, thats besides the point: Imagine the public outcry if this was a man breaking the same laws? EDIT: Just realize, I better explain first line: National age of consent is 15 where I live.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:13 AM
0

It depends on how you define parameters for measuring the statistics. If you only view the very small percentage of custody issues that end being decided by a judge, then, as far as I am informed, the custody decisions are close to equal, but according to some sources, that only accounts for a mere 1.5% of all custody cases (altho, the source is the huffingtonpost, so take that statistic with a grain of salt). If we look at the broader spectrum of all cases in which a both parents want at least …
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:28 PM
16

Im split. I hate the "teach not to assault" idea, cause I don't think it will change the mind of those prone to commit assaults. But then I like how they changed the wording, so it doesn't just label men as perpetrators, by being neutral about who the assaulter is, and even using "man" and "men" when talking about victims/the one getting assaulted, which is nice progress, at least in their way of thinking
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:59 AM
12

I think the point is that in the regard of Cosby and Jackson, it was 1 person accusing and other copying the accusations, once they was made public, jumping on the bandwagon, whereas with this kid, these girls conspired even before the first allegation was made and knew each other. Very different crimes, even if the outcomes may seem the same, people conspiring together are able to build something seemingly much more convincing than an unorganised group of strangers just copying each other
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:53 PM
0

"At least with a Dane we knew our baby would be attractive" As a Dane, I fully support this part!!!!
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:09 PM
1

Doxxing is not alright SCP foundation got nothing to do, in its core, with neither feminism or men's right, so taking the battle to them seems kinda wasted resources. We are not an attack squad, we do not support or belive in doxxing.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 12:48 PM
3

This place is starting to do more harm than good for men's rights advocacy. I've been starting to see otherwise cool and level-headed places of discussion start to really hate on MRA and citing this subreddit every time as an example of why it's a horrible movement and they're damn hard to argue with because they're quite literally backing up their claims with unassailable evidence. Could you provide these examples, seeing how I have never seen this; I found the total opposite, in fact. I found …
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:53 AM
1

just in case you are unware: This is not viewable for people outside the UK
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:42 PM
3

I agree wholeheartedly with that, asking what a person did to provoke doxxing or any other attack, is not acceptable
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:13 PM
-1

I would say the only difference is, that doxxing someone has 1 circumstance, to me, where it is acceptable. If A is threatening to or has doxxed B, doxxing A and providing A's information to B (but not spreading it publically) is justified, i.e. assuring they know whom to report to police in case legal action becomes necessary Not really any situation where raping someone back is justified/helpful
/r/MensRights26/03/15 12:58 PM
2

Snit-picking - I am pretty sure that checking any facts they use will be considered "a highly questionable fact-check", such as when pointing out how the wage gap or the 1in5 statistics are false
/r/MensRights25/03/15 10:49 AM
1

I will also add that criminal liability is another issue entirely; The consequence should always at least be that the teacher is fired. Here in Denmark, the laws on the matter is that if you are 15, you can consent to sex in general, while a teacher or other person in a position of trust or power, or who abuses their age authority (its rather vague in that one, but never heard of an actual case based on age authority alone) cannot have sexual relations with someone under 18. Once 18, most instit…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:58 PM
3

While I disagree with you, as the teacher is in a position of power over the student and should never start a relationship up under such circumstances, I'll also say that your position is in no way sexist, as I assume you would have the same opinion if the genders had been reversed? Labelling you a sexist here, it just a sign they won't bother to make an argument for their position. I don't want to be a lazy as them, so here is why it should not be up to the student in this situation: The teache…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:50 PM
4

Depending on your teachers viewpoint, it might be dangerous for your grade (if its important to you) to come with actual statistics and facts, if she is feministic in nature, beware, they tend to hate facts that contradicts their prefered narrative
/r/MensRights23/03/15 09:23 PM
0

Oh.... my bad, might want to leave that as a reply to the guy who actually wanted to go there through :)
/r/MensRights23/03/15 06:57 PM
2

Think the objection is that your OP said gender being vilified or blamed, and there is a huge difference to blaming feminism and blaming women.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:22 AM
16

If its not about 2 movements meeting and debating, but about the 2 genders both being a part of it without focusing on either gender more than the other, then /r/egalitarian
/r/MensRights23/03/15 10:38 AM
2

Fucking Bubbles!
/r/MensRights23/03/15 02:29 AM
1

Damn, we been had then :)
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:56 AM
6

DAMN! Fuck me, thats insane, so its increase from $100 pr. kid to $800 pr. kid? Thats just.... omfg
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:52 AM
2

Not saying those percentages are good or anything, I am just saying those are the official guidelines I was able to find, and according to even those, the charge against this man is obscene
/r/MensRights22/03/15 10:48 PM
8

How much income do they assume he has annually? $800 pr. child pr. month equals $9.600 pr. child annually. According to https://www.childsupport.ny.gov/child_support_standards.html the child support should be equal to 17% of annual income with 1 child, 25% with 2 children, 29% with 3 children, 31% with 4 children and no less than 35% with 5 or more children. That means that for those numbers to correlate, then they assume his annual income is: With 1 child (which we know is not the case), means …
/r/MensRights22/03/15 09:39 PM
9

And he was so cool about it going up from $700 total to $800 total too, no problem, but yeah, depending on the # of kids, thats an insane increase. If it was total then $700 to $800 = 14.29% increase 2 kids = from $700 to $1600 = 128.57% increase 3 kids = from $700 to $2400 = 242.86% increase Thats.... ludicris
/r/MensRights22/03/15 09:31 PM
1

Re-read the discussed article and had indeed overlooked that part about it going online and onto social media, so it was indeed distributed. In no way excuses the 17 year olds actions through; She had resource to contakt police rather than deform him for life. On scales of wrong, she was infinitely more wrong in what she did than he was. And that still doesn't adress the fact that it would been more misleading to call her underage than teenager, it would been even more accurate to mention (17) a…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:18 PM
1

And what did I write that makes you think I am unaware of this? Seems like a very knee-jerk reaction there. Imho, a 25 year old secretly filming himself and his 17 year old girlfriend and not distributing the filmed material (nothing indicates it was distributed as far as I am aware) is not infinitely worse than if a 25 year old secretly filmed himself and his 18 year old girlfriend and not distributing the filmed material. Its still wrong to film without the consent of your partner, but knee je…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 08:56 AM
3

I am talking about the laws in South Africa, did further research on them after my last post and seems my first source was slightly faulty. My first source said it was 16 and 18, and that raised issues when someone 16 or 17 had sex and did not have parental approval, giving the impression 16 and 17 year olds was allowed sexual relations if their parents approved. The law is actually 16 and 17year old are allowed sexual relations within a 2 year age gap, so it did violate local laws for them to h…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:14 AM
8

She was 17, and depending on circumstances of parental approval of relationship, that might mean she was NOT underage according to the local laws there (or by most sensible laws, but thats not really a men's right issue) And the post in question does mention she was a teenager specifically, which seems to cover it much more clearly than calling her underage, which would give a picture of someone much younger than 17. It seems to me that in this case, you are the one who wants to put a certain sp…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 12:31 AM
0

Added to subscriptions and will try and remember to take a peek by once in a while, I am interested to see what issues specifically affects those with trans-identities.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 12:24 AM
0

And turns out you was right, just that I must admit, as someone who is not transgender myself, my knowledge in the subject is limited, hence being open to the possibility
/r/MensRights22/03/15 12:04 AM
0

Thats cool, was just curious. And if you do make a subreddit for discussions, be sure to leave a reply with the link, and I'll stop by.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 12:03 AM
4

Can you provide an actual example of such a case being posted here? Even if your example is meant to be an simplification, oversimplifying issues doesn't help anything, please provide some actual examples, as I heavily doubt anyone has posted that (without it getting immediately called upon and downvoted heavily)
/r/MensRights21/03/15 11:59 PM
0

That is very possible, but OP did call him/herself "a person who identifies as transgender", where I thought a transgender was someone who identified themselves as the opposite gender than the one they was born as? Its possibly just a lingual/grammatical thing and the meaning is excatly what you said, but in case its not, Im open to learning something new
/r/MensRights21/03/15 11:57 PM
1

Well, at least they are portraying the man as disliking it and being freaked out by it and not as enjoying it, "cause all men like all women and want physical contact with them". Not saying this is right, just saying... there are worse things than men being displayed as dislking, but having to accept unwanted unconsentual physical contact from a woman who identifies herself as attractive
/r/MensRights21/03/15 11:50 PM
0

I am not a trans nor do I use skype, but I see no reason for not giving feedback and do discussions with you, if you feel like it. I'll ask a question right away then, cause Im a little puzzled by your post: I was under the impression that trans identities would be either trans-man (born with female genitalia, but actually a man on the inside) and trans-woman (born with male genitalia, but actually a woman on the inside), but is trans in itself a gender identity as well, or just that you forgot,…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 11:45 PM
11

Great to have you here in the subreddit dedicated to the mens right movement then :)
/r/MensRights21/03/15 11:43 PM
5

Hahaha, I love how the used the gif with "independent thought alert", I wonder if she realize that undermines her entire point?
/r/MensRights21/03/15 06:43 PM
0

No.....
/r/MensRights21/03/15 06:42 PM
7

I tend to respect a rejection (but then Im not one that gets laid that often), but got to throw my 2 cents in that you are definitely on to someting here. I had a friend who kinda tutored me in how to pick up girls once (he was reading PUA litterature and showed me a little bit of it), and do remember how blown my mind was, when he insisted that if a girl at a club said she had a boyfriend, you should just say "I didn't ask that, I asked you to dance!" and be insistant, and how the first girl wh…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 11:55 PM
1

Hey and welcome to the forum, I am not sure if I, or anyone else here, is suitable to accurately answer your post, but I'll give my view, even on stuff you didn't excatly ask I'm a lesbian. I don't consider myself a feminist, because I think they're wackjobs. However, sadly, lesbian and feminist seem to go hand in hand for many. The problem is that I am not a man hater, but I'm viewed like I am and SO many lesbians actually are manhaters. I am not a lesbian because I dislike men as people, becau…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 11:41 PM
2

I don't see that anywhere? I notice they don't mention neither men nor whites/caucasians in their text, sure, but nothing saying white men are not allowed, am I missing someting?
/r/MensRights20/03/15 09:17 PM
0

In my experience, you cannot argue with someone who will blindly believe and support something as simple and inane as "they should just teach men not to rape", but if you really do want to bring it up, you already mentioned the first problem: Men are sexually assaulted by women too (Althrough, depending on the definition used, rape can be almost impossible by some of the standards feminists like to support; Some definitions of rape only includes penetration, rather than sexual conduct without co…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:27 PM
13

The change in the bottom of the article does sort of put True's, the student's, version of events into question
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:20 AM
-1

I'll add I did neither downvote or upvote your post, but did also notice how both your post and my post was in the negative earlier EDIT: And I now see mine has climbed into a slight positive, whlie yours remain in the negative, hope you won't take it as a pity vote that Im giving you an upvote now, but you are right it seems stupid that you are downvoted for stating your opinion in a forum for discussion. And sorry for my convoluted wording, English is not my primary language
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:57 PM
-1

Actually seems like a smart move to disable comments; What if some idiot was to publically identify the kid in the comments, which seems likely to have happened, had she not disabled comments
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:50 PM
0

Thats fine for you to think so, but it comes from the one I responded to, and it seems you don't have same problem with his usage of the bolding
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:49 PM
0

why you say you disagree with me, and then make an instance of repeatedly asking again, which I already said was not a gender issue, I was quite specific that it might be a gender issue, if you was shame for asking someone out, as long as it was not for doing so repeatedly and not accepting the "no"
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:47 PM
0

If people at her daughters schools is able to figure out who she's referring to, then that means they are aware of his repeated attempts at asking her out and him getting repeatedly told the no responses and to go away, as presented in the video. If they already know this, then her calling him out on doing excatly that, should not damage his reputation and shame him any more than his own actions has already shamed him. If he is more ashamed of her basically repeating the daughters rejection in a…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:09 PM
5

Regarding sexual assaults and domestic violence you can also mention how feminists have taken a concept and an attitude to their extremes and this prevents looking into many possible solutions. The concept would be "don't blame the victim", which is indeed an honourable and good idea at it's core, as it is always the perpetrator of an offense that is the guilty party. The problem lies in the fact that this is coupled with an attitude of seperating individuals by gender and enforcing the view of …
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:11 PM
5

Singular cases of male students either not feeeling unfairly treated or actually not being unfairly treated, says very little about the general trends in schools today, which research has objectively studied on a larger scale and concluded unfair treatment of male students
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:59 PM
0

Think you forgot to use np links to their subreddit (and I see your post was removed here now, which might by why) I find it oddly amusing that someone who belive in a system of society with no governing body is moderating who can participate in the discussion there
/r/MensRights14/03/15 12:41 PM
458

Oh no, a text that has an actual fact in it! /OUTRAGED! /s
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:58 PM
5

^ strongly agree with what /u/Mitthrawnuruodo1337 said above in his reply. Also some posts here are made sarcastically to point out that by the rape definitions, where the least bit of intoxication makes something rape, then certain cases, often involving feminists, the feminists are themselves rapists, if those standards they are campaigning for was to be applied, trying to point of the hypocricy regarding the issue, cause it strongly seems that while feminists will claim otherwise, they view i…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:05 PM
3

I extent to you the finest greetings on this day, good sir. But I must most certainly assure you dear Sir, Jest I do not. I must say it is indeed so. I tip my bowler hat to you, good sir and bid you the day keep being as fine as it has been until now
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:57 PM
8

Alright, I'll try and summarize it, but it won't be short, cause it is a bit complicated. Zoe Quinn is often seen as the catalyst for the GamerGate explosion. This is because she is a indie game developer and her boyfriend or ex-boyfriend at the time (im not entirely sure) made a blog post online regarding her and their relationship, where he talked about how she had been unfaithful to him and been with men from the gaming press, naming 1 man specifically as her having been sexually involved wit…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:28 PM
11

Wow, would love if all feminists put this much work into analysing why the statistics are what they are. Apparently only happens when the statistics doesn't fit their prefered narrative, for some odd unexplainable reason! Anyway, by itself, the article is a great read, she does give of the vibe of being heavily invested in defending women at times, for instance she does not question whatever the fact that custodial fathers are twice as likely as custodial mothers to say the non-custodial parent …
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:56 AM
0

Greetings and welcome, I will keep this short, as I am not a woman, so your question is not directed on me, just want to add that you explain the type of personal experience you had yourself and your conclusion based on that experience, which is that excellent fathers are denied full or partial custody on the basis of their gender alone. You reveal you got both personal and professional experience in this regard. Care to share a story, I would, for one, love to hear the stories you have witnesse…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:03 AM
1

Oh, should have made this clear: Mutual friend, who is also quite politically active and who has views I generally don't agree on, but who is the type open to listen to other points of view, shared a post. The shared post was basically 2 posts: First a commentary about how well off women in Denmark are and how the issues they complain and fight for are basically meaningless, pointing out how much worse women have it in other parts of the world (Which I'll agree is a bullshit argument) and a rebu…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:56 PM
0

Maybe would also been worth pointing out that neither you nor her was part of those centuries of oppression of women, and while all the power was historically held by men, men was not historically empowered nor free in any higher a degree than women for most of human history. And if what she wants to do is play a game of catching up, where men need to be slighted and oppressed in the same way, then she is not fighting for equality and a better world, but for revenge for a slight that never happe…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:22 AM
2

So the feminist movements trying to break and eliminate gender roles, is why feminists movements like to say that "Real men don't hit women" in their campaigns against domestic violence, supporting an old gender stereo type... 1) Regarding what is a real man, as opposed to what, excatly? 2) Indirectly claiming men are the only perpetrators of DV 3) Ignoring male victims of DV, especially if by a female aggressor, which, according to most studies, is just as common as vice versa 4) Painting viole…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:53 PM
2

I used to, and still partially do, identify myself strongly as a feminist, without being active in any feminists groups. To me, feminism meant the fight for gender equality and I felt strongly regarding how men and women should be treated equally, that is men should be treated no worse or better than women and vice versa, but as I grew older and got aware of more and more issues regarding unequal treatment, a clear pattern emerged; Feminists only want women to be treated no worse than men. They …
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:42 PM
2

Because sexual attraction is not a choise. Just like how being attracted to either men or women the most, blondes or brunettes the most, big or small tits, tall or short, so is slutty or chastise a matter of an attraction an individual can have, rather than a choise they make. Saying their lifestyle (own number of sexual partners) dictates which sexual attractions they are allowed to have, is ignoring how the world actually works. If sexual attraction was a conscious choise, I would wholehearted…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 01:24 PM
2

Then learn formatting. To indicate it is the word of the day, put it in quotes, so the meaning of what you post is clear rather than vague. I read your current title as what he said was misandrist, and not watching the hack, I would have no other frame of reference to what it would be. Anybody catch Bill O' Reilly's word of the day yesterday?......."MISANDRIST" That, that would have been absolutely spot on and without any vagueness. But rather put it on me being off, rather than you being unclea…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 12:37 AM
5

Repeat it here then, when you don't link it at all and don't bring the quote, this post is meaningless
/r/MensRights06/03/15 02:13 PM
1

Seeing how the linked article is a wall of text, could you provide a quote to support that without us having to read through that entire piece? Such emotional manipulation is something I'd rather not read through entirely to find a small segment
/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:36 PM
4

Pro gender equality for both genders EDIT: Let me spend a few minutes elaborating: Mens Right Activitsts are, in general, working for gender equality between both genders and have a focus on issues facing men and well admit to this focus. Feminists generally claim to be for gender equality, claim they work for all issues, at best, ignoring issues facing men, or, at worst, activitely constributing to the discrimination of men with their politics. It is socially acceptable, for instance, to say "R…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 06:20 PM
11

Its an example of some of the logic that feminists employes to justify their own bigotry. They redefine sexism to mean not just discrimination based on gender, but couples it with priviledge, and defines that as belonging to a generally priviledged class in society, which means either "male" or "white" according to feminist theories. Thusly, suddenly you cannot be sexist towards men nor racist towards white people. It makes no logical sense and that is why you do not need someone smarter than yo…
/r/MensRights20/02/15 11:10 AM
1

To add to /u/pornography_saves_li reply, it is a logical fallacy you invoke when you claim "Real feminists understand....", known as the no true scotsman fallacy; You do not get to decide who is and is not a real feminist
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:46 PM
1

Did you accidentially reply to the wrong person here or something? I have been the one argueing in this thread that feminism has done positive things; I never brought up the term misandry/misandrist. So why are you attacking me now, and throwing such terms out as white supremecist towards me? Please, read the thread you are replying in before attacking anyone
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:43 PM
11

Absolutely this, MRM does not claim to be the solution to problems facing women, but often feminists claims MRAs/The MRM is pointless, cause any issues (that they deem legitimate) that men face, is adressed by feminism, according to them. They then continue to ignore certain issues (or outright denying that it is an issue), give it very low priority or claim a solution would take away resources from a more important issue (which is always a women's only issue, big surprise), so it can't be helpe…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:17 AM
0

I never claimed otherwise. The question was not about what the majority of feminism does or what major movements does or anything like that, it was if feminism had done ANYTHING positive at all. So unless you are denying that ANY feminist has worked to make shelters for women while not opposing any efforts to raise money for shelters for men, you are completley misconstrueing everything I have said so far. I honestly feel like I am talking to a brick wall; No point you have made was not made by …
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:10 AM
0

Talk about missing the point. Did I say they are NEVER the same people? No, I actually specificly said that I am certain that some times, they are the same people. But alright, seeing how you willing to make the claim, positively prove to me that every single feminist who has raised money for shelters has also actively done things to hinder funding for male shelters
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:00 AM
1

While I think your little story is nice, and quite a visualisation, I don't find it entirely accurate, due to how rescueing people at sea is necessarily a seeking effort, i.e. you are going to them, you are coming to the victims, which would mean those only saving white people, in your example, would likely be going right past the non-white victims and leaving them to their deaths (a consequence that is more certain and final than the consequences are for DV victims (Im not saying DV victims don…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 11:04 PM
1

Getting funding for shelters for women is not automatically tied into denying funding for shelters for male victims, thats assuming those are always the same people. I am not claiming there are no feminists, who while raising funding for shelters or other offers to female victims, are also campaigning/working against funding for male shelters, I am sure such vile people do exist. What I am saying is that there are also feminists who has worked to raise funds for shelters and other offers for fem…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 11:00 PM
-1

Really? We going to be strawmanned for answering this question? Are you THAT desperate to attack femism? Get a life, demonspawn, stop strawmanning people
/r/MensRights17/02/15 11:34 AM
2

audio or even video recording is the way to go, just dont share any of it with anyone and only use it in case of a false accusation. Video is better for defending yourself than just audio, but the legality of secretly recording might be less in your favour, but there are ways to get around that and also, chances are you'll walk free from those laws if you bring it forth to counter a false rape accusation or similar
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:51 AM
3

Well, to try and be unbiased, yes, they do actual good, some feminist groups have provided shelter for victims of abuse, as long as the victims are female. There are other examples of things they have done that are objectively good.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 02:57 AM
1

Then please repost her actual wordings here, if you want help to factual rebuttal against her. Vaguely paraphrasing what she said gives us absolutely nothing to work upon
/r/MensRights16/02/15 10:44 PM
1

Ignore the trolls, i.e. ignore your supposed "friend", she sounds like a lost cause that cannot add anything good to your life by associating with her. If anything, simply reply with a "That is simply so plainly untrue, I cannot be bothered to debunk such obvious lies such as men have all the rights, only delusional people would sincerely belive that"
/r/MensRights16/02/15 07:39 PM
6

NOW you're getting it! Good boy! :P
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:21 AM
1

I do no condone violence as a solution to such a situation, specially cause you left your friend there and she might been pissed and irrational enough to take it out on him once she regained consciousness. Rather you had taken him out of there and insisted on calling the police regarding the domestic violence you had witnessed in the past, got evidence (in form of bruising on him) off and how you just had enough when she was basically bragging about it now. Was totally with you in your story at …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:58 PM
1

Once they say that, put your hands up and go "wow wow wow, I do not accept victim blaming, thats just disgusting!" and show you are disgusted by what they just said, claiming male victims must be initiating it themselves by being aggressive
/r/MensRights07/02/15 10:50 AM
2

But lets add this then: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5LRdW8xw70 male children, from birth, showing more interest in mechanical objects while girls show more interest in humanoid objects (faces), I am not sure how your bias of all experiments being invalid due to "already socialized with the behaviors in question" applies to newborn babies
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:45 AM
2

And now you are absolutely strawmanning what I said. I never said that all those stereotypes you listed are correct, I am simply saying that while we should abolish the idea of Traditional Gender Roles amongst adults in relationships and so forth, we should not go into the other camp of denying any biological differences, but you are now demonstrating excatly why I have to say that, because the moment someone mentions it is possible to also go to far in the denial of biological differences, peop…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:42 AM
11

Well my number on statements about men that I am tired of hearing from women is "Men cannot suffer from sexism, cause they are the dominant/most powerful/"patriarchy bullshit" sex", its just shows absolute arrogance and intellectual dishonesty or bankruptcy when a woman says that, seriously, they are either being willfully dishonest, delusional or they are absolutely failing in the intellect department
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:00 AM
2

And Im saying that sometimes people are starting with the conclusion that there are no biological basis as all for traditional gender roles and will grasp at any weakness in a study to invalidate it more than the weakness should, i.e. letting a single piece of anecdotal evidence outweight a mountain of empirical quantative data just because the anecdotal evidence supports their premise of "no biological basis". Im not saying research which starts with a premise/bias are not bad science, I am say…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:49 PM
5

Depends in which way they are being used. Some gender roles are based on physical and psychological differences between men and women and sometimes studies or anything else that acknowledge that there are differences besides the genitalia are attacked for enforcing gender roles. In that sense, fighting/abandoning gender roles can be bad because it becomes dogmatic. In the sense of stereotyping both men and women and trying to dictate who should be doing what and not by default, I think gender ro…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:36 PM
1

Alright, for the last bit, I got no idea if you follow the girl, if she follows you, if she is the one telling you to go to the room, or thats your idea. I don't know if the girl following you is the friend of the flirting girl or the flirting girl herself, I don't know if its her friend or the flirting girl who is accusing you of rape and if its the friend, is she accusing you of trying to rape her or her flirting friend?
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:59 AM
2

Alright, still not 100%, but tried to rewrite it myself, please respond with anything thats incorrect in my interpretation: Throwitawayyoo went to a party at his friend's, A's, house and there was a lot of people, both men and women, that Throwitawayyoo didn't know, so he decided to go play videogames with his buddies. Throwitawayyoo make a joint for some girls who wanted to smoke what he had brought along and they was impressed by him rolling a joint for them. The girls was also very drunk and …
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:58 AM
2

I have no idea, cause I simply don't understand the situation, who did what and who said what in response to what, cause it's kinda a mess in the way you described it, I am afraid. I'm a very shy college student and my freind said girl stop twerking on his "privates" he cant control his feelings if you continue Alright, so you are shy, so your friend tells the girl to stop twerking on YOUR or HIS OWN privates cause HE or YOU can't contorl YOURS or HIS feelings? You jumping to much between writti…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:33 AM
1

Get a lawyer - Take it to court, child support is not a one way street and if you become primary caregiver, you should have a good case in court
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:59 AM
2

Perhaps, but ignorance of ones own malpractice does not excuse one for legal responsibility of the consequences
/r/MensRights01/02/15 05:50 PM
2

I am sorry to hear that. It is really a shame that such a, I assume, charlatan and manipulator can go on unpunished and potentially repeat this devastating practice to someone else
/r/MensRights01/02/15 04:31 PM
1

I mean his fight for custody, sure, their brutal killing seems more of a case of them being batshit crazy tho to me
/r/MensRights01/02/15 02:35 PM
5

This is a known problem with certain methods used by some therapeuts, which also explains alien abduction memories and is widely disused and discreditted today. Lawyer up and target her therapist directly in a lawsuit for ruining your name, family and everything, that what I would do.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 11:40 AM
1

You summarized the article, which I had read. Doesn't explain why it belongs here
/r/MensRights01/02/15 07:49 AM
3

So, after taking a look over your post history, what is your point in posting this here? Trying to get a reaction out of us, to try and prove some point, due to your bias against the MRM? Or you actually offended by this (poorly constructed) attempt at a humorous song and wanted to share it here due to being offended on our behalf? All the image/song shows is someone with a poor humor and a low opinion of the MRM (like thats something new?) who tries to be funny at our expense. Who cares?
/r/MensRights31/01/15 10:47 PM
2

They was not supported; I already said those was comments from the "Bad comment" section, so that should be obvious to anyone who actually read what I wrote. Just in case this is an attempt at primrose pathing, I'll just say that even if they was severely downvoted, unpopular and unsupported, they still support the fairness of the OP in the linked image calling for it being shocking how many attack the manhood of the victim, which the OP in the linked image was then attacked as if he was making …
/r/MensRights31/01/15 08:32 AM
5

Thank you, and for the rest, so people don't have to find them themselves: Firstly, he replied and pointed out he was not an MRA himself, and then asked her if she had read the bad comments section, which I then did and: Fight back? Lets not make this a trend of dudes getting their ass kicked by girls. Man the fuck up. Get this shit off Imgur, nobody cares... Did she beat him up because he looks like a dork? you pussy ass how you gonna stand there and let her hit you And the circle jerk continue…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 01:01 AM
2

Not sure how this is a men's right issue, but never the less a horrible horrible story, made me feel so sad inside
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:30 AM
0

Very fucked up. Also glad to have someone post here, who can see good in both sides, and quite surprised at the flak you are getting in other comments here so far.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:26 AM
2

Came to say excatly the same. Without a source, we cannot know which of those two are right. If someone ignored questioning of manhood, perhaps cause the word "manhood" wasn't used directly, that shows a lot. If someone was indeed just making it up without any comments questioning manhood, then yeah, someone was just as bad as what we blame feminists for doing at times
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:23 AM
0

The aftermatch makes it clear you was serious about wanting her off in any case, so at that point, she should have gotten off. If it was a demanding clear and serious tone, then it was rape already when she stayed on to reason you could just come in her
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:43 PM
2

Seeing how much of communication is in tone of voice and such, it is really hard to say, cause to me, it depends largely on how "get up" was said. But seeing how it sounds like you followed it up by trying to get her off, then it is clear that you wanted the intercourse to end and she continued it after your withdrew your consent, and that alone makes it rape/sexual assault
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:23 PM
1

How is this a men's right issue or even an issue? Sending someone a nude photo of yourself is one thing Taking a picture someone took of themselves and send to you, and then sending it to someone else without the person in the pictures consent is MUCH worse objectively. So the punishments fits and no mentioning of genders in relation to the punishments
/r/MensRights30/01/15 11:40 AM
2

Not really, that something might change its characteristic in the future doesn't change its value in the now. Likewise, a mutation that is not neutral, such as an extra vulnerability or resistance to polio which would been either a benifitial or harmful mutation in the past, is a neutral mutation now, due to the eradication of polio. Likewise we could label all current negative mutations as neutral, if we are willing to "post hoc ergo propter hoc" judge mutations for any event that has yet to ha…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:33 AM
1

And if T5 is bad and you mutate a resistance to it, you avoid a risk. Thats a positive. And seeing how we know which, if either, of those are true, then neutral seems like the right catagory, for now, even if it might change in the future adjective not supporting or helping either side in a conflict, disagreement, etc.; impartial.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:30 AM
2

And how does that make it bad, as per your statement?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:24 AM
2

If you mean that as we can never truly know for certain which mutations, however insignificant seeming at the moment, might some day turn out to be more suitable for survival given a new unexpected selection criteria being introduced, I'll agree, or vice versa, obviously, but that still doesn't support the "most mutations are bad" claim
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:18 AM
3

Also just wanted to point out that you made a positive claim first and rather than support that, you attacked my objecting/counter positive claim as if lack of evidence for my claim somehow would make yours true, not that I don't want to provide evidence, and I think that point has been made, so here we go: Stanford: http://genetics.thetech.org/about-genetics/mutations-and-disease Few mutations are bad for you. In fact, some mutations can be beneficial. Over time, genetic mutations create geneti…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:54 AM
3

personal incredulity is not really an argument tho
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:36 AM
0

Which is not what the rest of us was talking about, so....
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:14 AM
3

I mean it is hypocritical that you attack me for not sourcing a positive claim made in response to you making an equally positive claim almost the opposite regarding the same subject.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:14 AM
7

I am, for this reply, going to reply to you directly and assume you are yourself a transsexual man, if this is not the case, please don't be offended :) There is no questions that you belong here in my mind, as from my perspective, you are a man, you just happened to have been born with a very unfortunate birth defect. And I'd say the same to a transsexual woman, so don't take it as being a woman is a birth defect; Being born the wrong gender is a birth defect in my mind, and I am very happy we …
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:47 PM
3

Depends on how you judge it, but yes, one could argue that it wasn't neutral in the end. Also, now you turning this around on me that I am the one making the positive claim? I agree that saying most mutations are neutral is a positive claim, but don't forget that it was said by me in response to you saying Most evolutionary changes are actually bad.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:33 PM
2

Cancer is (at least mostly) not a evolutionary mutation tho, it happens during your lifetime due to genes reproduction inside of your body and thus differentiates vastly from the discussed topic. And obviously the types of mutations that causes illness and such are bad. But there are also mutations that makes your skin ever so little lighter or darker than your parents, makes your hair be a little closer or further together, makes your eyes color an almost undetectable shade darker or lighter th…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:31 PM
3

at least the advice she is getting is: No, don't quit working, you should be finding a way to support yourself at your age
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:18 PM
2

That assumes the standard model of rape in which a rape is due to a physically forceful attack, in which it is a standard assumption that the average man is physically superior to the average woman, but 1) not all men and women fall under the standard physical spread and 2) not all rapes occur like that. For 1, imagine a generally bulky, overweight (so she can put her weight behind her movements as power) woman and a scrawny thing borderline anorexic man, she would easily be able to physically o…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:14 PM
2

Do you have an example of a mutation that doesn't impact our ability to survive at all? Mutations occuring during reproduction in dormant dna is the most obvious example. Most mutations does not impact the organism in any measureable way. Take the example from your own sources article in your other reply, which goes into a mutation for a cat that curls it ear back slightly. This is neutral change unless there are selectionary pressures that either promote or prevent reproduction based upon the m…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:01 PM
1

I'd venture a guess that 2 women might be close enough friends that 1 will cover for the others "sins", and that by including a 3rd woman, there will always be some mistrust, as they cannot all 3 be equally good friends, and hence cannot have 100% trust, at least that would be a possible theory they could have that would explain why they require 3 women present to talk to a male stranger
/r/MensRights29/01/15 12:31 PM
3

Mutations in evolutionary terms can be judged in 2 ways; either based upon how the influence an organisms survival up until the point of reproduction, i.e. a change the hinders reproduction is bad, change the furthers it is good and a change that doesn't influence it either way is neutral. Or by a population groups ability to survive. In the later, all mutations to humans are neutral pretty much, seeing how these changes doesn't anymore influence our abilities to survive or not, and no major cha…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 12:23 PM
3

You do realize that there are over a hundred mutations in every human off-spring, just to mention one very familiar group of animals, right? Every single reproduction leads to mutations and the more complex a lifeform (as in mammals as opposed to bacteria) the more mutations occur during a single reproduction.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 12:15 PM
2

Love the '"But Foot amputation is worse than toe amputation" is not an argument in favor of toe amputation' line, such brilliant wording! If I could, I'd gild that
/r/MensRights29/01/15 11:53 AM
3

Total side point, but always cringe when I see this, so correction coming: The mast majority of evolutionary changes are neutral!
/r/MensRights29/01/15 11:51 AM
1

Agree, the ad depicts a single situation based on a real story from this year, and does not depict domestic violence as a one-way street. If it had included statistics about how many women are victims of domestic abuse while leaving out the how many men, I'd say it was bordering on promoting the false one-way street belief, but it doesn't even do that. One thing we blame feminists for, in general, is going out of their way to make themselves into victims, and taking issue with this ad seems to b…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:54 AM
0

You are welcome, and glad to have found, after suspecting something else when first seeing this posted, that it was actually done in spirit of having an actual conversation and not just to point fingers at MRAs in the usual biased way as happens a few times daily here.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:15 PM
1

PLEASE NOTICE! Link by OP has formatted poorly and does not lead to a NP version of the MGTOW thread! Still, do NOT upvote or comment if following the link! EDIT: I cannot see what OP did wrong, so not trying to say he did it poorly
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:11 PM
6

Please, he said there is a lot of assholes out there and then 'some of those [tweets] a just funny', so clearly, he said that not all of them are supposedly funny and defendable, so why you putting that position on him in your reply? That is actual straw-manning someone, please avoid doing that as it is intellectually dishonest. Also saying this is expectable, as in comparing it to if Westboro Baptist Church was on twitter, is not saying it is acceptable, but pointing out this is not about misog…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:06 PM
1

Dont see this as that horrible, it seems like the boy was making trouble of following along and it a smooth floor with jeans on, it doesn't cause harm and her pull on his arm doesn't seem violent by rushing too much. Just saying, as someone who has worked with children, instances like that can happen
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:44 PM
1

I don't think anyone is saying she is lying when she says she is getting threats, and I'll start by saying that some (that is as in "not all of them") of those tweets are indeed horrible and beyond defense and those who made them should be ashamed, even if done in anger. The problem is that she portrayes things that are not threats as such. Now, this is labelled harassment, and honestly many of those I do not qualify as absolutely horrible might fall into harassment, but then she has, by mislabe…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:24 PM
1

I hope you can be, that would be great. Also by talking to her, you can go the noble route, if possible. I know its not your job to save her current relationship, but might help your case if you can talk to her and say you want to know if it is yours, cause then you want to be involved, and maybe say you'd prefer if you two could do some testing discretely without getting lawyers and things involved. That will be in her interest as well, as I assume that in case it is not yours, she'd prefer cur…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:56 PM
3

Yes, get a lawyer, don't ask legal advice on the internet in general, find a real lawyer and get professional help. Also, best of luck from here, hope you get to be in your kids life as the great father Im sure you'll be if it is your kid she is pregnant with.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 10:22 AM
2

If you can commit domestic violence in public and have everyone laugh and smile while they watch you, and feel safe knowing that everybody will come to your aid, should your male partner defend himself from your attack, you have female privilege. FTFY
/r/MensRights27/01/15 10:40 AM
1

Any chance to make a "FRIENDS" reference, I take it
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:28 PM
1

Such a strong argument, some explains how what you said is completely intellectually flawed nonsense, but saying they used a lot of words and it's bullshit, totally counters logical arguments!!!!! Got to love the brainwashed SJWs
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:28 PM
2

But then why do you keep posting that incredible stupid shit all over, if you object to it so much?
/r/MensRights26/01/15 06:14 AM
2

The example you made up to demonstrate your point shows that you the one actually missing the context of this practice. The problem with your made up substitution is the context of the other things stated and not with the actual substitution and has been designed to allow your narrative to fit. If we take your previous stated wish for substitution white men with christians and christianity instead, it is also easy, by the same context manipulation of the rest of the sentence, to make statements …
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:46 AM
1

Seems from your post history that you might actually have perceived the answers differently in the linked thread (and imho, wrongly). Sorry for flying off the handle, just getting sick and tired of the daily bait posts by people who just want to get a quote to put on srs and srd to further their biased narrative about MRAs, so I rushed to a judgement, my bad.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:07 AM
22

Actually, you are missing the point entirely. If something you say about a class of people, be it men or women, Christians, Muslims or atheists, white, hispanic or black people, and it does not seem okay if you substitute you choise with another of the same catagory, as in substituting white with black, or men with women, or as in this example, white men with jews (which is both a belief and a ethnicity), then it is actually not okay to say it. History of priviledge does not affect whatever some…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:05 AM
1

Feel free to add me to any lists you have, I know people like you who are always going to assume the worst about anyone MRA no matter what we write, do or say, and who will bait by misrepresentation, borderline lying like you are with this post, will keep your lists and make judgements no matter what we do and say here. Unless you really just misunderstood the replies in the post you cited, but seen to many bait posts here lately by the subreddit that shall not be named
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:51 PM
2

The comments in the linked dicussions (the top ones) all say it was not rape. So you misrepresenting us in an attempt to try and make us look back. You are clearly a troll with an agenda and a bias towards the MRM, trying desperately to make us fit your narrative of us being twisted people, while we actually are not. So downvoted this, and can wholeheartedly say: Fuck off, you fanatic creep
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:25 PM
5

Always amazes me how THAT subreddit has a "do not feed the trolls" banner, a bigger bunch of trolls are hard to find
/r/MensRights24/01/15 06:39 PM
2

Its great you want a positive type of feminism, but that does kinda put you outside of the mainstream feminism. I applaud your efforts tho, but don't try too much to deny the others as being feminists, as that is also quite insulting (intellectually) due to being the "no true scotsman" fallacy
/r/MensRights22/01/15 08:37 AM
7

This just dumbfounded me. You claim to be a feminist, and you're surprised that these laws come from feminist activism???? Like..seriously? I smell a poe
/r/MensRights22/01/15 12:19 AM
1

very relevant question!
/r/MensRights16/01/15 05:21 PM
2

That is still not evidence of censorship as previously demonstrated the screen shot appears just like that when you delete your own posts. For all we know you delete your own posts in order to spread your propaganda again and again
/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:11 PM
3

This is very misleading! He did not spend over a year in jail - that was another case and people keep linking this case with that statement attached
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:54 AM
1

Very true, but the one with the highest percentage growth will eventually get into the lead. Take your example and let's say that they each grow their respective 1% and 10% each year. Even with the 1000% lead, the feminists will get overtaken by the superior growth percentage after just 27 years (where mrm will reach 131,0999 and feminism will be at 130,8209)
/r/MensRights25/12/14 04:58 PM
3

Think you are confusing the growth of single channels related to the movements with the growth of the movements themselves. At the moment, feminism is undoubtedly a larger movement than the men's rights movement and can thus lend more support/subscribers to a new feminism channel than the men's right movement can; that does not mean their movement is growing faster nor more healthily than ours
/r/MensRights25/12/14 02:13 PM
1

Totally off-topic, but all I could think about when viewing this was that that layout for mobile looked freaking sweet. What app you use to access reddit on your phone?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:28 AM
5

I always found this puzzling. Well, I agree that those who put a bag on the seat beside them in a bus or train are quite selfish, if they don't move it as seats starts filling up. But in general, and this might just be my personal experience, when travelling in public areas, those who generally do not show consideration for those around them appears to be mainly female, as in those who fill the entire sidewalk or aisle in the supermarket with their carts and stuff while either looking for someth…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 11:08 PM
1

I'd be interested in a good write-up if the hypothesis is indeed valid and all the points to support it can indeed be confirmed, such as the earnings gap remaining the same since 1969 and so forth, something I was personally unaware of. And I agree that most followers here in this subreddit, but we also have to remember that newbies comes by every now and again, and if the posts they see just assumes our narrative to be true and people start feeling they never have to document their claims, then…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 11:04 PM
1

Your hypothesis seems solid, if I understand it correctly as being: "If the 'earnings gap' has not narrowed or broadened significantly since 1963, then the Equal Pay Act, which made it illegal to pay women less than men for the same work, has not had any influence on actual wages, hence there never was a wage gap" I do have a major problem with your premise, as you wrote it: Do no postulate that something is thoroughly debunked as a premise: Link and demonstrate it is thoroughly debunked. I beli…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 09:04 PM
2

Shit advice if the friend being comforted did have a kid with him/her! ;)
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:57 AM
5

Also how comparing being expulsed and incarceration as a justification of lack of due process, as if the potential punishment decides the level of rights you have to a fair trial, so if you are accused of offenses, which are fined, we can just skip due process, because being fined pales in comparison to being incarcerated
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:50 AM
1

So.. would you feel it was appropriate to go ask the /r/feminism if that subreddit was basically one huge taco party?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 02:06 AM
11

Sick how Therese Edwards, the CEO of the Adelaide-based National Council on Single Mothers and Their Children, will twist the situation and inquiry into something it is not “It’s really clear that [Domestic Violence] is under-reported. (and) it does a disservice when men’s groups say the opposite.” The Lone Fathers Association (Australia) claimed false accusations was made and that the law assumes guilt without due process: They are not saying DV is over-reported, just that women during custody …
/r/MensRights16/12/14 09:09 AM
33

This post and thread is part of why I love /r/mensrights "Oh, someone got a real life story, it fits our narrative, support our cause..... but it is not objective, there are faults in the research method used, so we cannot accept this as evidence of anything"
/r/MensRights15/12/14 01:55 PM
0

Got to agree with BlackNOrangeZ, this is not really an issue, as far as you have presented things here. So someone gave a speech, thanked various groups and the one giving the speech (or the groups/people she thanked, you don't make that clear) was feminists..... So...fucking..what?
/r/MensRights14/12/14 10:35 PM
2

very much indeed
/r/MensRights14/12/14 06:45 PM
6

Second this and by the sounds of it, it was definitely sexual assault you was the victim of, if it classifies as rape depends heavily upon local laws where you live, but I doubt it goes that high in legal standards.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 11:30 AM
2

The dick is the entire focus, it is the CENTER of the picture and 100% in FOCUS. No, the focus is always off to either side and a bit up and down from the center of a photograph, I thought that was common knowledge? You don't focus on the center of pictures, but off to either side and a little up or down, the golden cut? Ring a bell? Umm retard? I just stated they are not equal. Way to read properly retard. I refered to your original post, in which you stated nothing about them not being equal, …
/r/MensRights14/12/14 10:32 AM
1

Your argument is based on the fact male and female genitalia are 100% equal... Acually, I'd say you opposition was based on male and female genitalia being 100% equal and I just pointed out they are not, so right of the bat in your response, you are misrepresenting my position, not a good sign. which they are not, proven through thousands of years of science. Sure, it takes different methods to expose male genitalia than female genitalia, but that is only because females and males are inherently…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 05:16 AM
5

I don't think you are actually looking very closely here, as I seen similar statements made before, but usually those are made on other forums/subreddits and whole misrepresents what is actually going on here. Personal story time: I discovered this subreddit and the Mens Right Movement, when I was repeatedly seeing references to these insane people known as Men's Right Activists (MRAs), who was supposedly saying stupid things like men being more opressed than women, men being raped more often th…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 04:48 AM
1

Good article, but it does get one thing factually wrong, and while I do not like Lena Dunham, the article says When it turned out that Barry, a readily identifiable person from Dunham’s days at Oberlin, did not rape her, the media largely went silent; Dunham still has not spoken on the issue. This article is dated 10th of December. On the 9th of December, she did comment and apologize for anything he went through. Source: http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/10/lena-dunhams-self-pity-responds-to-barry…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 04:41 AM
1

Well honestly the reverse-gender situation you put up is not equivilant to this situation. A vagina is not in a natural state being "wide open" and the male genitalia here is not "facing the camera". I doubt there would been any uproar if it had been a female baby swimming naked in the same position as the boy baby here. And that the penis is visible to the degree it is, is just due to how male anatomy is different from female anatomy. To be comparable to your hypothesied situation with a wide o…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 04:24 AM
4

Who is Weev? What actions by him are you refering to? Please provide sources, we are not automatically aware of anything going on inside of your mind, /u/Ekabolio Quick google comes up with brief description of Weev as possibly being a pseudonym of Andrew Alan Escher Auernheimer, a grey hat hacker, white supremacist and internet troll, so I assume this is a primrose path attempt at going "look, MRAs are crazy, they like Weev!!!"??
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:54 AM
12

Simple, ask "Would you hit another man back, if he was significantly physically weaker than you?" If they reply yes, simply go "But if a woman of the same strength as that man hit you, you wouldn't? Then you are just being sexist" Its really that simple
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/14 06:36 PM
1

The personal subreddit wouldn't be to spread it out to more, it would be a tool to help yourself identify what videos are good and hence improve your other videos, by analysing what works and doesn't work, by having access to information regarding which videos ends up being shared and upvoted
/r/MensRights13/12/14 04:15 PM
1

Thats excatly what I was thinking :) Is a good way to also measure what you made is good quality. Additional tip: Make your own subreddit and post every single thing you produce to that subreddit (I am 90% sure thats allowed, but check up on it yourself first), then you can use the "other discussions" feature to see which videos are shared and how much and where they get shared, something gets shared positively a lot = good quality, something gets mocked or not shared at all = need more elements…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 12:19 PM
3

Maybe trust that if you got several subscribers from this subreddit to your channel, then they can share anything relevant and good that you post on youtube? Self-promotion is frowned upon on reddit in general
/r/MensRights13/12/14 11:28 AM
1

And you are allowed to link to articles demonstrating/claiming and supporting the claim that her allegation was a hoax, just not if they, at the same time, choose to post her alleged real first + last name rather than just call her "Jackie", so whats the problem?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 09:56 PM
6

There is a few that I think you choose a side on, when you didn't have to: You'll never hear from an MRA that women are necessarily physically inferior to men. You'll only hear that we need them in selective service because they can help defend our nation too. Might be better not to take the stance of pro-selective service, as thats an issue many MRAs are split on, more than MRAs are split regarding many of the other issues. perhaps instead "You'll only hear that men and women need to be equally…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:15 PM
2

Cera Byer, take a deep breath, and try and stay with me, I know this will be hard to swallow, but you are not facing discrimination and your ideas are not being dismissed, on the basis of your gender, by white males, not in general. Sure, there are still white males out there that are sexist, or racist, but the vast majority are not. When you experience them dismissing your ideas and assume the reason for this is due to sexism, you are misunderstanding the situation. Many white men have now reac…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:31 AM
1

Then if thats the issue you wanted to raise, you should really have flaired this as double standards. And if I supported her details coming out, I'd be having just as much double standards as they do
/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:07 AM
1

My mistake, but that also falls under my "In any case" clause, in which I detailed that EVEN if they was named, that does not justify a witch hunt upon her; It opens her for legal consequences and they should pursue their legal actions against her fully, but doxxing her is NOT okay
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:35 AM
1

Where I am from, medias generally do not release names of those accused until a verdict is reached to avoid coloring public opinion of the person (this place being Denmark), some exceptions does happen, such as high profile people being involved in things (and not saying its okay then, just acknowledging thats how it goes here). This summer there was the case of a Danish exchange student being accused of pedophilia in New York (and later cleared of all charges) and it shocked many Danish people …
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:33 PM
2

That sounds about right, I will agree with them on this. She tried to have the story pulled, but the Rolling Stones went on and published it anyway. The original story did not feature any named individuals or fraternities, the journalist screwed up and leaked that in a seperate interview, so she, "Jackie" did not instigate a witch-hunt on any specific fraternities on the campus. In any case, even if she had publically named them and had control over the publication of the article publically nami…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:32 PM
1

Admittedly an editorilization and not a fact that I got statistics to back. Feel the need to ask my initial question again as I not gotten a real answer yet: initially you said you (feminists) don't like MRAs due to separating from feminism when it's the same thing we want and later admitted the focus is different between MRAs and feminists, so why do you really dislike us? No need for political correct and transparent bullshit this time
/r/MensRights08/12/14 07:43 AM
2

Well, then to return to my original objection to your original answer to me, we want different things when it comes to the battle for equality. I want rape to stop too, but I also want focus on those making false rape accusations as they are getting away with it at a much higher rate than those commiting rape, and they are aided in getting away with making their false rape accusations by feminist organizations under the mantra "it will discourage real victims from coming forward, if the false ac…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:19 AM
2

So if I understand you right, you are saying that of those feminists you know, personally, they all want those making false rape accusations to be punished? If thats the case, and I am glad to hear it, if it is, do you disagree with me, if I make the claim that the most common opinion amongst mainstream feminists organizations is that those making false rape accusations should not be punished, because they claim doing so will discourage real victims?
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:57 PM
3

That is simply not true. We want different things, as in a lot of the equality issues that we are focusing on, feminists often actively opposes and works against, such as justice for those who are falsely accused of rape. No matter how rare false accusations may be (they are not, but feminists keep claiming they are), those who are falsely accused are VICTIMS, those making false accusations are NOT victims, and need to be held responsible. Thats just 1 issue; So follow up: Why do feminist want t…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:48 PM
1

as did I myself
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:43 PM
0

If she is to take responsibility for anything, it should be through the legal system and not by an online witch-hunt, the rules here are pretty clear regarding this
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:43 PM
3

I'd like to ask, what it is you (and I don't mean you personally, but feminists in general, the group you identify with) see/think MRAs and the MRM do, that makes you guys hate us to much? I see feminist ideas getting attacked frequently here and with sources, facts and arguments to back up the critical voices against it. But all I see feminist do towards MRAs/MRM is disregard us, belittle us, name-calling and so on and so forth, and I really wonder why that is?
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:40 PM
3

Regardless of what we think of her story, and as a consequence think of her, we should not participate or promote any doxxing of her!
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:28 PM
6

Hilarious, thanks for sharing
/r/MensRights06/12/14 10:45 PM
1

It was also meant as a small jab laden with humour, and not as something I seriously think exist. But I also doubt you got any evidence for your claim about it not being genetic, but a social construct?
/r/MensRights06/12/14 11:20 AM
12

Don't have a source, but I seem to remember hearing that Israel found out, due to using both men and women in their military, that men and women fighting alongside each other on the front line was a horrible thing. Not that women can't fight the front line, but they should be in women only units fighting their own station/position on the front line, and men in their own respective units. What I heard was that their experience had shown that despite the heavy training to do suppressing fire and e…
/r/MensRights06/12/14 12:48 AM
2

I stand absolutely corrected, you are right, it was not counted in rape, but in sexual coercion. I still hold to my general claim that the CDC report is inaccurate, but you are right that this particular issue is not actually applicable and I will stop saying that. Thanks for correcting me
/r/MensRights05/12/14 03:36 PM
1

Go to the source you just posted here, go to page 106 of the pdf, find the section where the left hand side reads: How many people have you had vaginal, oral, or anal sex with after they pressured you by… Then on the right hand side, notice this is an option for finishing the question: wearing you down by repeatedly asking for sex, or showing they were unhappy? I.e., husband or wife having sex with their partner after said partner has been wearing them down by asking for it a few times / repeate…
/r/MensRights05/12/14 09:42 AM
11

Got to love those who follow logic and base their decisions on what is logically fair, rather than due to emotional attachments to labels. Applaud to your mother
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:33 PM
5

Which is part of why I found those statistics inaccurate, but at least the broad definitions applied to both men and women, so comparing the two ratios should still apply
/r/MensRights04/12/14 01:58 PM
2

I don't think a husband or wife asking their partner for sex, being turned down and then asking again a few times, and the partner than end up agreeing to have intercourse, is equal to rape. I think it is very sad, but not rape CDC counts that as rape
/r/MensRights04/12/14 01:57 PM
20

Firstly, notice they say "violence" and not "domestic violence", meaning all assaults on men are compared to domestic violence by females. Seeing how men are more likely to be victims of general assaults than women, this is a dishonest tactic to make men seem even less like victims of domestic violence by comparing their rate of being victims to a skewed measuring-stick. According to the CDC report (which I find highly inaccurate in general, but organizations like white ribbon love) more than 1-…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 11:14 PM
22

When you slightly into the conversation, instead of engaging them and countering their points factually and with sources, decided to mock them by doing a mock feminist post towards your friend, who was actually being a little over the top, you alianated them and lost all credibility in the conversation. You're such a white cisgender male privileged asshole. Can't even look up a simple definition [censored] its almost spelled like cock so check your phallic privilege. That. Never ever do that and…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 03:47 PM
5

What? He starts by making 3 claims, then pronounce they are facts! Didn't you hear him? He used the word "fact", now you cannot disagree, they are facts!!!!!!! Ain't that how it works? You make a claim, claim it is a fact, show you are a SJW, and then it is taken as fact? I am confused!!!!
/r/MensRights03/12/14 12:34 PM
19

From the article "They said he's too old to stay on the women's side, because of the women running around in their pajamas and they said he's too young to stay on the men's side in case some pervert wants to do whatever," Lejeune said. This mirrors the case of airlines asking only male passengers to move away from unaccompanied children in the view of only men being potential offenders, while women are assumed to be trustworthy and safe to leave children around. EDIT: Already posted by /u/Psionx…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 12:23 PM
1

I am a libertarian socialist, and only my libertarian views as seen as unusual when discussing things in real life where I live. And I'll agree with your observation regarding the left, just not something that is inherent connected to it tho. Just feel the tendency to attack the left rather than the issues might risk to alienate potential allies who are leaning strongly left
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:22 AM
1

I was also mostly opposing the constant misogynistic labeling of us than the reactionary labeling
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:17 AM
6

Just as the OP here, I'd like to add that I am a socialist, living in a mostly socialist country, the American left (politically, not regarding political correctness overkill) is generally extremely right-wing in my perception. Don't get why political views needs to be pulled into this, as the same comment has been made countless times, this was just the one triggering me to compile the list
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:58 PM
1

Lets play "spot the factual inconsistancies!", we start from the beginning of the post title. Woman FULL STOP! It was several of them, and this is singular, it should be Women! kills 25 helpless Oh, they was taliban members who had killed her son in an ambush, them killing someone means they are most likely not helpness! boys. Again, taliban warriors, no other mentioning of age or even "boys" in article, lets assume they was men, that seems fair, even tho, their gender is not even mentioned in t…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:50 PM
1

Thats not at all what I am saying. I am saying your post here in /r/mensrights does not reflect in any way that your article is regarding someone being falsely accused nor tortured by the court system (which I hope is editorializing what happened) And nothing against the warning, but when combined with your title+posts containing absolutely no information about what your linked article is about, then it becomes a hinderance; If I clicked your link, knowing that it was regarding false accusations…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:19 PM
1

I know you have written in other posts you made, as a reply to people, that you are not a writter, but please, your titles are unbearable; There is no information about what those blogs you are linking (and wrote yourself) is about, its just small quotes of text that has absolutely nothing to do with men's rights issues that you use as titles to your posts here and your leave no explanation of how any of your posts are men's right issues. Add to that, that your blog warns of adult context before…
/r/MensRights27/11/14 10:34 PM
1

Oh, I looked at the survey after seeing the video by CHS too and raised some of the points you made in other threads, but just never took the time/energi to make a list and post it like you did :)
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:04 PM
3

Thank you for taking the time to create this list with refutations that I find quite sound
/r/MensRights27/11/14 04:38 PM
1

I never experienced compassion nor empathy being viewed as weakness or negatively by society in general, so I think the whole claim that feminine qualities are viewed negatively is not.only wrong, I'll venture the claim that the opposite is in fact true: the traits that in general mainstream culture gets a negative spin are the masculine traits. In literature and movies protagonists often undergo learning curves to show they are better off when absorbing and accepting traits and behaviors relate…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 10:26 AM
18

depressing how most comments there show people thinking her being punished for a VIOLENT PHYSICAL ATTACK is silly.... And as someone has pointed out to them in the comments repeatedly; If the genders had been reversed, nobody would be claiming it was silly to call the cops
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:37 AM
2

I'd argue that patriarchy is a system which attempts to tell "men" they have to be masculine, and "women" they should be feminine. Furthermore, that things which society says are masculine are good, and feminine things are bad, or at least to be looked down upon. While I wouldn't say that masculinity is necessary bad, I would say that people should have the opportunity to choose how they act, and toxic forms of masculinity should be opposed. Compassion and empathy are generally viewed as feminin…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:32 AM
1

Soon got a Educator Bachelor, I am a roleplayer, a video-gamer, a doctor-examinated and approved massage therapist, former sociology student, borderline insomniac, European, socialist, democrat, libertarian, addicted to a ton of TV-shows,
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:37 AM
3

Given I live in a socialist country and love it here, I am obviously going to disagree strongly with your friend on some of his views. He comes across as quite unable to support his views and ground them on anything logical coherent, a bad representation of MRAs if there ever was one, but then, not to be harsh, but you did not fair much better; The entire conversation read as just a series of opposed statements and claims about what you each believe without any of you providing any supporting ar…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:33 AM
7

At first I cringed by how she only dealt with women, femme and masculine-identified and the paying for dinner. But credit is due, she didn't switch it up and include men once it came to placing blame, which was a breath of fresh air, as too often men will suddenly be included once placing the blame comes into all of it.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 10:56 AM
2

besides the problem of him acting completely sober, as pointed out by /u/ARedthorn, I really was glad when this line was spoken at 4:33, emphasis mine Sexual assaults is happening to young women and men, and 1 more is too many
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:19 PM
1

I initially said non-police report, I have seen them and have equally good arguments for why those can't be taken alone. The OP wants evidence for against, so far you're just tackling evidence for and presenting none for a number of your own. Never claimed police reports paint the full picture either Fallacy fallacy. Flaws in your opponents argument help your case but the don't win if for you. That would indeed be a fallacy, if my claim was another specific number. My only claim here is that the…
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:44 AM
1

Did you see any that actually fit the first? Because I'm not disputing the second. Granted, I misread your last post as claiming 9 out of 10 didn't fall into either catagory (it is now 2am here, I am borderline insomniac, but about to get to bed now, so my mental faculties aren't at their prime right now :) ) I see a few that I think might discuss 1, but honestly too tired to read through long walls of text to confirm, so I'll grant that it is possible none of the first page results when searchi…
/r/MensRights12/11/14 01:26 AM
1

You exclude police reports, and I'll say any data survey based on interviews is faulty by its very nature in regards to a problem as complicated as this, while also acknowledging that police data would not paint a complete picture either. I saw none that didn't fit my 2 catagories when I clicked the link you previously provided...
/r/MensRights12/11/14 12:48 AM
1

And seems mostly when cited here by members of the MRM, it is to either 1) Discuss how faulty it is in general 2) Highly that even this source (faulty or not) paint a more even picture between men and women than it is being portrayed to do by the media in general Saying how someones source paint men as almost equally as much victim does not mean you accept the general validity of the source, and some aspect of a paper can be more reliable than others.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 12:16 AM
2

The source is one of the many surveys done by the American CDC (Center for Disease Control), called NISVS (The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey). The 2010 report established nearly 1 in 5 women and 1 in 71 men gets raped during their lifetime. However, the methodology of the NISVS survey is faulty; For 1 thing, it had a very low response rate and sampling group, so the generalizations drawn from it are hardly accurate, and also the ways they establish rape is not simply askin…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 11:29 PM
6

Yeah, as said by others, it was not his goal/cause that made him the villian in the movie, but rather his method of attaining his goal that made him a villian
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:17 PM
18

So now all he should do is apply for the job and then sue for discrimination when he doesn't get it, citing that facebook post, because that is clearly illegal discrimination based upon gender
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:29 PM
3

Agree, and also notice how the judgementally the boys in the article faced was all from older people. Their friends was curious too, and perhaps judgemental, but they sounded easily convinced it is fine, so far as even converting 1 of them to wanting nail polish as well. If not due to adults judgeing, nobody would ever get traumatized the slightest for doing something like that
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:27 PM
1

Look up http://www.theduluthmodel.org/ for evaluating domestic violence cases, in which one factor is "male priviledge", which puts the initial blame towards the male party in any domestic violence dispute and is inheriently sexist. Also check out http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/domestic-violence-industry/1-in-4-women-admit-to-violence-in-relationships/ It basically shows how 1 in 5 men admitting to violence in relationships was widely reported, while the same data showing 1 in 4 women d…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 12:42 PM
1

Awesome article that hits the nail right on the head, thanks for sharing; Just wish it was a bigger publication that Fox Baltimore
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:33 AM
1

Or maybe you should learn english? Saying "another woman" is not a generalization about the entire female gender; That you are equating "all women" (your thread title) and "another woman" as being pretty much the same just indicates you don't know how to read english
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:30 AM
3

Also worth noticing that this had lead to a significant decrease in the safety of the women selling sex, as it now has to take place in secret and they cannot distinguish between a man just worried about getting punished and thus wanting to meet/go somewhere secluded, or the violent criminal who wants to isolate and harm them and thus wants to take them somewhere secluded.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 02:23 PM
0

Thats a very twisted way to look behind the origin of the term cis imho. Do you think labelling yourself (if you are so) "straight" is a way to make heterosexuality sound like a pathology? Cis has nothing to do with sexuality(heterosexuality), by the way, but with gender identity, i.e. trans and not trans. If you only label the deviation from the normal, i.e. only labelling trans-people while applying no term to those who are not trans, it seems as if trans if just another pathology, at least th…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 07:54 PM
3

Reddit perhaps, but this subreddit has generally not censored and supressed free speech to nearly the degree that other subreddits have. I have no plans to include "cis" into my vocabulary, but I see absolutely no problem with others using the word on this subreddit, it is in no way offensive to me, I am a cis-male, sure, it just means I am not trans, how is that supposed to be insulting unless it is said in a specific way, in which case, almost any descriptor can become insulting.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 07:39 PM
12

Its from a chapter called "Limits of a criminal justice response: Trends in police and court processing of sexual assault" in the Book "Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Woman's Activism". (That is clear from the source in the picture This specific chapter is written by Holly Johnson Selected Publications Profile Notice in her profile that while she got a B.A and M.A. in Criminology, her Ph.D. is in "Social Policy" and her fields of interests includes "Feminist Theory and gender …
/r/MensRights09/11/14 07:35 PM
1

That is batshit crazy, but I don't think we doing ourselves much of a favor by labelling this as domestic violence; They will be able to see how it is not domestic violence here, due to lack of their own bias that prevent them from seeing it in instance with roles reversed. But sure, its a nice source to demonstrate it to them, in a debate regarding it
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:54 PM
5

Depending on the nature of the harassment tho; Previous post was made under the assumption it was just her hitting/flirting with him, if she escalated to quickly, i.e. unwanted physical contact, then thats harassment, regardless of his age
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:44 AM
12

on this one, I am split too, but thats because Age of Consent where I live and have always lived, is 15, so this would actually been legal, seeing as she is not a teacher
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:18 AM
8

How circulated? At the bottom, I don't see a single like, comment or share listed, not sure if thats cause there is none or cause it's cropped out of the print screen
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:02 AM
3

And men visit these parks alone more often than women? I wholeheartedly agree with your statement, I just don't have any data that supports it being applicable in this instance
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:00 AM
1

That is a valid point, I just don't know if /r/mensrights is the right place to highlight it prior to gathering evidence that it is actually a gender discrimination issue
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:00 AM
3

I agree that in general, pedophilia hysteria affect men much more than women in general, and I also grant that this restriction is unneccessary, I just don't think that this specific instance of pedophilia hysteria is proven to be a gender discrimination issue without anything suggesting that would actually ignore the police and let in a single female visitor unlike how they enforce it towards men.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:58 AM
1

So we are to assume gender discrimination when there is not positive proof of something gender neutral being actually gender neutral? That seems like feminist logic to me.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:56 AM
1

Now that would be interesting to investigate, and if that is the case, then it is a men's right issue. But without knowing if that is the case, I don't think we need to highlight this, seeing how there are so many valid instances of gender discrimination targetting men, so why take up an issue that (possibly) doesn't discriminate on gender?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:03 AM
-5

Yep, I know that, but that, to me, is even more reason this doesn't belong here, it is misleading
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:27 AM
-6

Single in the context here does not seem to be as opposed to married, but as opposed to coming as part of a group of 2 or more people or on your own to the park. I think you are on thin ice defending this as being a men's right issue, and claiming the pedophilia hysteria is a feminist-inspired thing is very thing also
/r/MensRights08/11/14 11:22 PM
3

My guess is she realized afterwards how much they was clearly flirting, constructed the explanation of how they was sent to avoid a sexual encounter, and that explanation ruined her own case, as it made her seem very mentally aware of her actions. Seriously, we are to belive she in the span of a few texts sent over a short period of time went from constructing texts on highly complicated motives to not being able to remember anything happening up there her own room? Glad this case ended as it di…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 11:17 PM
2

Domestic violence? I saw her destroy a car, nothing physical towards the body of any other person, so how is this domestic violence?
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:45 PM
1

Doesn't belong in men's right, as it was not discrimination based upon gender.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:43 PM
3

As far as I understand the concept, it is a "balancing" descriptor. For sexuality (and talking broad terms here) We had "normal" and gay, and it became heterosexuals/homosexuals and straight/gays, ignoring for now bisexuals, adding a descriptor word to the dominant sexuality for balance. If we look around many areas, it is often the case that the "normal" gets a descriptor after knowledge/understanding of a subject becomes more common place. Likewise, those who are trans, felt it was "normal" an…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:20 PM
-1

So much like how some boys (and god, I hope they are still boys, and not men) who in online games will call you a fag/faggot/homo, which should not be an insult, but is used by some stupid/immature people as an insult, you have encountered immature girls/women who use "cis" as part of their insults? Never encountered anything like that myself, nor seen it happen to anyone else, but it sounds more as an issue of some immature people (women) you have encountered, rather than the word in general be…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:10 PM
0

I never really seen any say that directly towards someone like you just did, so cannot comment on its usage in situations that I have never seen happen outside of parody
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:20 PM
1

I don't like how this piece assumes Jian Ghomeshi to be guilty of what he is accused of having done prior to any form of trials having taken place, so it doesn't really help my hope for humanity that she calls Jian Ghomeshi out for not yet having apologized, when for all we know, he has nothing to apologize for
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:54 PM
9

I'd venture that they know what it means, but your lack of knowledge has probarly made you unable to see the correct meaning in the contexts it was being used in
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:40 PM
2

Never understood the logic behind that somehow making it okay
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:15 AM
2

It depends if it reaches front page or not, I fear at this point EDIT: More curious about what reasoning they will give, if any, this time around if it makes front page and gets remove, than whatever or not it will be removed upon hitting front page. Obviously, if it doesn't get traction, they might ignore it
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:26 AM
7

This is one of the cases that really shows how manipulative investigators at the police can be and how things can be turned into confessions, even when they are clearly not. He(Malthe) was told they had videos of inappropriate touching (not description of what excatly it was, just "inappropriate touching") and he said that if they had video of it, then it must have happened... There, he confessed to inappropriate touching, even tho they didn't actually have any film of it and he didn't admit to …
/r/MensRights07/11/14 01:04 PM
2

1-4% of all children are not growing up with the father being the actual biological father, excluding cases where it is known it is not (like adoption and such) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misattributed_paternity
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:33 AM
3

Thats not much evidence, your primary comment was not confirming your claim, but linking to a comment making the same claim. Making a claim twice does not evidence make. I see no sexism against men in the thread
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:27 AM
11

specially love this reply: I agree. I hope some friend of hers sits her down over a nice cup of chamomile, slices her a banana, and explains the concept of "projection" to her, while she can still pull her head out of the nether regions. Clearly, of gay rights and women rights, the one who has accomplished most equality is women
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:41 AM
6

That seems to be pretty much the case, yes
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:40 AM
2

Was thinking the same as Dr.Friendless, as while one can be satisfied with the pay you get for doing your work and feel you are fairly paid, it is a primal instinct that if you know someone else is doing basically the same work, but gets paid more than you, then your feeling of satisfaction with your compensation (wage) will drop significantly, so avoiding discussing wages and hence wage differences is in an employers interest, even if no gender discrimination is taking place.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:36 AM
1

Aye, thats my view excatly, which is why I am asking for specific areas that needs to be fixed, such as custody papers with 50/50 custody and signed by both him and her and a method of payment of child support that he can document, should she claim to not have gotten any money from him at a later time (I know he is the type who would be inclined to just get the money at the atm and hand it over in cash) Just want to be sure if there is any other important things to make sure he does the right wa…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:53 PM
1

Denmark, is in my main post, did you miss that or you need it more specific (not sure why, but suppose thats possible?) And yes, I want as much done with evidence, through the right channels and on paper as possible, just need to convince him about that, as he is not the most organized person, or to fond of doing things by the official system, I am very certain I couldn't convince him of this possibly going bad if it wasn't for that crazy mother-in-law that he knows is out to get him, if she can
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:39 PM
3

You said it much more elegantly than I managed, thank you :)
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:23 PM
4

As far as my understanding comes (and this is all speculation, so take it with a huge grain of salt) its due to how accepting any natural difference in brain structure and mental development would undermine several aspects of feminist doctrine including the evil that is socially upheld patriarchy, the root of all the worlds trouble according to the feminist doctrine. Besides how accepting even the slightest natural difference would provide a valid explanation for the original establishment of th…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:17 PM
1

Generally doctors are due to their knowledge regarding health issues and how central health issues is to the patients well being, regarded with high authority for their words and actions; People, in general, place a higher trust in what their doctor says to them than what other people say to them and regard following instruktions from their own doctor as being in their own best interest rather than him expressing his interest, which is generally the case when interacting with other people. That …
/r/MensRights05/11/14 07:30 AM
3

This is not an injustice to men or a gender discrimination issue. Its a breach of professional ethics by the doctor, which leads to a restriction of his professional allowances under the ethics codes associated with being in such an authority over people. The patients are not professionals in positions of power over other people.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:59 PM
7

Theoretically, yes in both instance. Practically, I highly doubt situation 1 would be taken seriously by police and investigators. I don't belive affirmative consent is a good thing, so I would say it shouldn't lead to a charge either in situation 1, but the law should be equal regardless of gender, so as long as affirmative consent is the law, it should lead to a charge and conviction. Situation 2 is very different. Even without affirmative consent laws, such a situation would be considered sex…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:56 PM
1

Sure, I will stop replying to you, when you stop replying to me. Your last few times you asked to stop the debate, you followed it up with attacking me and my views and making new assertions that was filled with errors, so I corrected those and counter-argued those. If you do no such thing, I won't reply, its that simple, but so far, you keep putting the burden on me to stop replying and imply that I am obsessed, while you fail to see your own, at least equal, obsession, its kinda funny :)
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:12 PM
1

I so despise words like never and always when someone tries to apply them to my words. I never(<---Notice I said never here?) said that a teenaged boy and a teacher was "Never Rape". I said I don't buy it because it does not add up. I recognize the laws are in place to try and prevent actual rape and probably to discourage teacher/student sexcapades, but rape of a male, by a hot female? Whatever you use never or always, making statements like this without qualifying it with "usually" or "often" …
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:58 PM
5

Yes, should call the police before someone gets hurt as pointed out by /u/browna3 already, and unfortunately, from what I hear, there is a high chance that he will be the one arrested, even if he is the victim; It would be helpful if you can try and find out between calling the police and their arrival, who appears to be the victim of the abuse (but do not try and find that out before calling the police) and then come forward as a the caller and as a witness to who is the victim, whatever it is …
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:56 PM
2

Further explanation coming? I can seriously not try and sit through that horrible sound to try and interpret through that auto-tune to get an idea of the lyrics, just to try and get what you mean is the problem in this video
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:53 PM
1

Sorry, but you don't get to do projections here; I already granted that it wont always be rape; The one with the blind conviction in their expressions so far has been you in it never being rape, which is what I have opposed. Projecting the opposite onto me, to make me out to be unreasonable is intellectually dishonest, don't do that and pretend you taking some intellectual high ground by claming you learned it is pointless to argue with those of blind faith, the only one demonstrated that so far…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:51 PM
1

I admit that there are all kinds of laws, ethics, and points of view that classify this as rape on her part, but from my point of view, teenage boys are giant hormones.... with feet. Giving that you and I agree that the above is generally true, how does that justify sleeping with them before they are mentally developed enough to be responsible for it? Girls also go through developments that makes it easier to get laid with them at certain ages, but generally it is agreed upon that you are then p…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:03 PM
1

I'll grant it is entirely possible, specially in the late teens (15 to 18 or there about) for an individual to engage in sexual conduct with someone else willingly and never regret it, and it is, to me, fine that if you have never felt like you was abused or a victim, that you live on with your experience. And while I will not start trying to say that your experience must be viewed through some biased glasses or that you was manipulated, as I feel that nobody else can make such calls about someo…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:44 PM
1

I'd say yes to all 3, depending upon what definition of rape is being used here. Ethically it is sexual abuse and rape for an authority figure, such as a teacher, to abuse the trust placed upon them by parents and their students to engage in sexual conduct with a student, specially if that student is under the age of 18. Not sure about American federal and state laws regarding the issue, so can't be too sure regarding the "according to the law" part, but in Denmark, where I am from, it is agains…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:18 PM
3

That he should pay child support while she is missing just makes no sense, and her defense of it just scream of "this is the best I could make up so it doesn't just sound like I am a greedy bitch" And yes, I'll call a grieving mother a bitch, when the one she is being a bitch towards is the grieving father
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:52 AM
2

at least the changes indicates that it was the newspaper, and not the legislators, who had the wrong idea of only women being victims....
/r/MensRights02/11/14 09:07 PM
1

Part of the application process requires demonstrating a knowledge about kids, listing teachers, nurses, nannies, babysitters, counsellors and parents as the obvious ways to demonstrate prior knowledge about kids, all professions heavily dominated by women in general, except obviously the parent one. Combined with how male drivers would obviously feel less worried (point made by the founder) working for uber or lyft, driving people around at night (whatever any fears by women are justified or no…
/r/MensRights02/11/14 06:07 PM
9

Did they change the wording in this article after this was posted here? It is all gender neutral terms now when I click on it. The idea of people being allowed to publically name and shame someone without a court approval is just horrible, whatever or not the law is gender neutral or not, those are 2 seperate issues, and that still remains and issue.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:27 PM
5

“Having to prove yourself, for me, was like being raped all over again,” she said. “No one should have to go through that. You should take people at their word because nobody would lie about this kind of painful experience.” This just made me cringe so hard... basically claiming false accusations never happen
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:54 PM
0

Can't really see this as a men's right issue. Its 1 towns 1 statue of 1 couple/family, that happens to be a lesbian couple. The spending on it is high, sure, but then governments/official institutions tend to spend a lot of money on various art work and the price tags have always in all cases perplexed me, so this is no more outrageous in that regard than so many other instances. Now, if the town had several statues of couples and all the couples/families was without men/fathers commissioned, th…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:42 PM
2

yep
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:28 PM
1

attack the credibility of sexual assault survivors By you... Only someone as arrogant and guilty as Ghomeshi would by yyyyyyz How is that not directly and indirectly statements to Ghomeshi being guilty without due process?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 03:59 PM
0

So instead of providing an argument, you just skip right to the logical fallacy of argument from authority, by asserting your own authority and using it to dismiss a point made by someone else? I sincerly hope you're not actually a lawyer.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 03:50 PM
1

Regarding the subject of the deleted TIL, I think the fact that later that day, the #1 TIL was this: http://np.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/2kdi5z/til_during_the_first_opium_war_of_1839_19000/ Title: "TIL During The First Opium War of 1839, 19,000 British troops fought against 200,000 Chinese. The Chinese had 20,000 casualties, the British just 69. The war marked the start of the "Century of Humiliation" in China." Source says 18,000 to 20,000, so the poster cherry picked the highest numb…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:29 PM
5

I really don't agree, Batty-Koda Cherry picking a statistic would be to select the highest statistic making a specific claim, i.e. if there was several statistics for when local agencies accuse the victim/caller of being the batterer, then selecting the highest statistic would be cherry picking. When there are several, admittedly related, statistic, focusing on 1 of them and specifying which one in the TIL title, is not cherry picking. If we applied this same principle of what is cherry picking,…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 10:12 PM
0

Found 1 error. You got this chain: Did you consent to the encounter? ---Yes--> Did you Revoke Consent during the encounter ---Yes--> Did the person/s involved know this ---Yes--> It was Rape I think between "did the person/s involved know this" and "it was rape", you need a "did they stop the encounter upon knowing this?", where a no leads to it was rape, a yes, leads to not rape
/r/MensRights26/10/14 08:42 PM
1

Him aiding investigators wouldn't really increase her opportunities of making false accusations tho
/r/MensRights22/10/14 07:57 AM
5

Came here to point out that piece of false information, but you beat me to it. Its just so untrue that it is depressing how they will continue to spread such a lie
/r/MensRights21/10/14 09:49 PM
0

Alright, I will agree that in order to prevent harm to a child, you should teach them restrictions. Touching a warm stove burns you, no reason to touch it, just cause you are curious, even if you feel your choices are oppressed. Likewise, if we lived in a society, as you suggested, where homosexuals was killed on the street, and my son was gay, obviously in the name of saving the life of my son, I'd teach him to keep it hidden. My son would still, however, remain a homosexual, thats a quality no…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 06:57 PM
4

To be fair, the boyfriend didn't coorperate with the investigators, which makes it hard to do a longer sentence. Still doesn't make it okay tho
/r/MensRights20/10/14 06:41 PM
0

Even if this is true, it's like I said before; children not understanding what the meaning of clothing is. They don't understand what cultural connotations come with clothes. Parents must explain this so the child can then make an informed decision. I understand your sentiment, but I disagree, I don't see a reason why we must enforce and pass down our prejudice to the next generation, just to shield them, because we expect others to also pass them down. No child is going to be fully formed enoug…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:03 PM
1

Was the rapist (statuary?) father allowed to see his child then?
/r/MensRights20/10/14 04:54 PM
-1

So you admit having not even read what I wrote. At least you admit it. I am absolutely not without fault, and will gladly admit it, when I am wrong, and I was wrong in that previous case. First of all, it's status quo Thanks for the correction :) , and second of all, it doesn't assume that at all. In fact, my statement is completely saying the opposite of what you think I'm saying, and I'm seriously starting to doubt your intellectual abilities and why I'm even responding here, when you openly a…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 04:13 PM
0

Sexes or sexuality participation in the reproductive process you are interested in? Don't know about the other sexes (beyond male/female), but know abit about other sexualities (or well, homosexuals influence on reproductive processes, so guess thats also quite limited)
/r/MensRights20/10/14 03:09 PM
-1

Actually, there was, but not as many as I figured, but he started his reply with them, so I initially didn't bother reading rest, as I usually don't when people just attack/project opinions on to me rather than adress what I actually said.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 03:04 PM
-1

People like you seem to think there's no such thing as manhood or being a man. So you give me this opinion, while I never expressed it, I take that as attacking me rather than adressing what I said. Seem to think there's no definition anymore and it's all a social construct Just read the rest, fine, there is actually points being made, but those bits of projecting opinions on to me that I do not hold antagonized me enough to not bother reading it, and assumed you would continue in the same direc…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 03:03 PM
0

Nope, I just actually know something about child development, so I don't agree with the uninformed ;)
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:22 AM
0

Wow, could we discuss this without resorting to a barrage of personal attacks, just because I do not agree with something being wrong? I suppose you cannot, repeatedly speaking about "people like me" and adding values to me I do not hold, just cause I don't agree with you here.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:15 AM
2

Adding to the perspective regarding religious ideals left in the cultural norm, where puritanical values are more common and widespread in the US than in Europe, which ironically means that feminists are more noticeable and outspoken when they got sex-positive views in the US, easily giving the impression, until doing deep level research, that US feminists are generally sex-positive. Meanwhile, the european society is generally more sex-positive and less puritanical, most of Europe got free abor…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 11:54 PM
4

So the little boy wearing a pink dress when he wants to wear a pink dress is going to remove his biological gender and make him unable to realize there being 2 sexes? I don't see any problem with what these parents are doing and I think the only way this could cause trouble for their child other children and their parents judging him upon it. The act of wearing a dress in and off it self does not hurt his "manhood"
/r/MensRights19/10/14 11:49 PM
2

It sounds like it paints MRAs in a very negative light, and would have expected this more likely to have been written by an opponent of MRAs from reading that introduction
/r/MensRights19/10/14 11:44 PM
15

Great, and they don't make it into a big deal that it is a dad doing the household chores instead of a mom; It just played of and comes across natural. bravo to Tide
/r/MensRights19/10/14 11:41 PM
5

That album is great. In the 2nd last, I got one small objection, however, because I like to apply the same scrutiny to numbers generated in advancement of MRA as that we apply to numbers generated in advancement of feminists, and in that picture, it is claimed that "30% of those named as fathers who test for paternity find they are not the biological father", while technically true, I find the wording hints/suggests 30% of those named as fathers are not the biological father, while obviously onl…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 07:47 PM
2

What does this has to do with mens rights?
/r/MensRights19/10/14 06:28 PM
2

Thanks for sharing; very good article and a good cause,
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:57 PM
1

Well, mid sentence or not, body language, tone, everything in conversation/communication leading up to the moment; From his perspective, it might have been a tense build up to that moment, where passion just got so high that finishing the sentence about what he was teaching you would delay things too much, and if you had felt the same, it would have been regarded as passionate and romantic. Not saying that is the case, but I don't see anything that proves that was not the case from his perspecti…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:33 AM
1

I should stated in my post, but I probably would have been open to having sex, probably not then but at a later point. What surprised me was that he never gave any indication of wanting sex or any sort of physical contact. It was literally mid sentence. Its hard to comment to surely upon the situation, because we here are unable to tell if it was you who was missing/misreading his signals, or him missing/misreading yours and other factors.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:10 AM
0

If I am reading this right, and your account is accurate, I see several problems in this entire situation and I will start from the top, rather than try and prioritize the importance of each thing. Firstly there is the situation with the university, which is absolutely unrelated to gender issues in and of itself, but helped create an atmosphere of desperation amongst students, including you, to avoid failing the course, so it becomes a relevant factor: I am glad to hear they got programs for thi…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 09:48 AM
1

Well, then I think he was stupid for trying to use "knowing" you to get into the company, and it is fair you don't want to help him. How inappropriate it is, I am not certain of, given it is likely breed from desperation for getting a job, rather than anything sexual EDIT: To clearify: I think it is inappropriate, but I think you can scale how inappropriate something is. And I find it exceeding unlikely that he wanted to call you if it hadn't been for the job opening at your current work place
/r/MensRights18/10/14 09:10 AM
18

Busy being there for his son, rather than commiting a criminal activity that would deprive his son of his father in this time of need, hopefully?
/r/MensRights17/10/14 11:38 PM
2

Agreed
/r/MensRights17/10/14 11:22 PM
1

I think the most interesting side of this to debate would be children of female raping men. Lets say Man, A, and Woman, B, have sex, Man A is only 14, while Woman is 28 (his teacher or likewise), she gets pregnant, it is found out, she gets convicted, has the baby, and when A is 18, he decides he wants his kid; How often would he get full and sole custody as a father when the mother has a rape conviction? I have no doubt with roles and ages reversed that the father would never be allowed near th…
/r/MensRights17/10/14 11:21 PM
1

It really depends on the circumstances around you two having sex on that single occation. If you meet at a party there, having never really spoken, and ended up hooking up one night and then never really spoke again, I'd say it was a strange thing to call you up. If you had, even just curtesy "hello, how are you?", conversations once in a while over a longer period of time, he most likely phoned you based on you being an acquintance from University, rather than on the basis of you being a former…
/r/MensRights17/10/14 10:52 PM
2

Definitely standard, but not mandatory, like /u/FasKap said. And it should only be a test between child(ren) and the suspected father(s) in each case, no DNA should be kept in database after such a test.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 07:43 PM
2

Simply just reverse it. If a woman said to you "You look like you need a girlfriend", would you not be offended? I would be damn offended if a woman said that to me, so yeah, it is offensive, and because you included gender in it (boyfriend/girlfriend makes it a gendered instead of gender-neutral), then yes, it is sexist. It got different connoctation depending on the gender, close to the same, but still varying a bit (and there is probarly something sexist in those differences also) But TL;DR: …
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:21 AM
1

I have need of neither a heavenly father nor a heavenly mother, in case that was not clearly what I meant in my first post. I don't see how this could possibly be regarded as an issue for men's rights
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:13 PM
1

Thats a religious discussion and not a men's right discussion, I have need of neither of those 2
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:25 PM
1

http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup/4906.0Chapter7002012 Women were more likely than men to experience violence by a partner. In 2012, an estimated 17% of all women aged 18 years and over (1,479,900 women) and 5.3% of all men aged 18 years and over (448,000 men) had experienced violence by a partner since the age of 15. 5,3% is roughtly 1 in 19
/r/MensRights02/10/14 12:56 AM
1

Tell me about it, I forgot to put "At Harvard" in my thread title...
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:51 AM
1

Guess I was lazy reading your reply before then, my bad
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:37 AM
1

Barack Obama using that very statistic in his recent launch of "It's On Us" Is that good enough?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:20 AM
1

I agree, but don't forget that your 2.314% is annually, while their 1 in 4 or 5 is during entire stay at college
/r/MensRights21/09/14 09:03 PM
1

According to the feminist source I have seen, it is 1 in 5 get raped while attending university
/r/MensRights21/09/14 09:01 PM
12

I was also very disappointed by how the article skewed it that way
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:10 PM
1

English is not my primary language, so rather a personal failure at realizing how it should be spelled, but thanks, will try and use it correctly from now on :)
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:57 AM
2

I am a feminist, as well as an MRA, so please, do not lump me into any catagories, just because some MRAs have a skewed view of feminism. To quickly explain myself, I might seem to go off-topic here, but please, read on: I am also an agnostic atheist, and have for years been frustrated by religious people trying to framework atheism into meaning something that it does simply not mean, repeatedly claiming atheism as being the positive assertion that there is no God. In their efforts to justify tr…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:56 AM
3

Ah, right, well, context matters, as you so rightfully pointed out, and clearly in the article, he is trying to establish it as something said in general and not in specific contexts like the one you just described :) But thanks, brought a little smile to my face, was something funny about the way you corrected me there :)
/r/MensRights21/09/14 01:50 AM
2

No. Well, some of them might be; I do not know where the statistics on the source comes from, but general critical approach to statistics that I learned at university (before I dropped out, realizing that wasn't the path for me) makes me able to quickly see that those statistics are either manipulated or from a survey containing considerable errors. This is very clear at the "Which of the following issues do you support" question, which makes it seem like very few MRAs care about high profile is…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 01:42 AM
15

It is exceptionally filled with strawmen representation of the Men's Right Movement, making the entire attack against MRM into an attack on a fictional object created by the author himself. “Won’t someone please think of the white man?” Nobody has said that in any MRM groups that I have ever seen. There exists a well-organized group of men (and I hesitate to call them that when “boys” would be closer to the truth) so deluded that they have actually convinced themselves that men in our society ha…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 11:47 PM
2

So you creating a divide between genderism and sexism, I like that idea. But I do not generally agree with your post, nor do I really directly disagree, I just find a lot of the things listed and mentioned unfounded; You make a big list of things you view as being the effects of feminism, but does not provide any reasoning or sources to support these things being the effect of feminism or even being true, and as such, I have a hard time taking it seriously or trusting it as being true. Also ther…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 11:18 PM
2

While highly inaccurate way of calculating this, lets just do this as an exercise to correct this a little bit: Female life expectancy at 82.2 years: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy^ 237,868 pr year for 82.2 years = 19,537,789.2 Which is way close to the 26,333,532 from your calculation, it being off has various factors (specially seeing how this is a grossly misleading way to calculate it), because rate at which sexual assaults (including rape) happens has, hop…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 09:32 PM
2

Yeah, seeing how much work and research this person put into this thread, it is quite embarassing to miss that vital part of the statistic
/r/MensRights20/09/14 09:27 PM
12

What is up with that salon article? The author keeps going on and on about how TechCrunch are sexist, but offers no rebuttal to the actions of TechCrunch or explain how TechCrunch reversing the roles in an article is sexist in any way, shape or form, it just postulates it, and claims they have better reasons for ManServant being sexist than TechCrunch does. It is like half the article is missing EDIT: Now the rest of the article appears, and it boils down to "So you point out sexism towards men,…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:07 PM
39

I'd like to add that one should always engage in a debate with a feminist as if expecting her to be one of the reasonable feminists, who will accept logical arguments supported by evidence, as with this assumption, one is more likely to present arguments without resorting to emotional arguments and points, or worse, namecalling and personal attacks, which will make MRA's looks bad, if we resort to those things. I know many have experiences of rarely, or even never, encountering a rational femini…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 12:29 PM
1

I do not know what TRP means, but I will give this a go: Many of the difference in how society threat men and women compared to each other comes from the views of each gender according to the power holders (which, yes, was mainly white men) both currently and historically. For instance the problem of women being sentenced less for the same crime than me. At least partially due to men in general (and even more so in the past) viewing females as more pure and less sinister/able to do evil than oth…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 08:23 AM
1

One little theory I have, that I think influence how this is perceived, is qualities generally viewed as belonging to the gender of the "offender". Men are usually seen as brutish, direct, simple in their social interactions, while women are viewed as more manipuliative, indirect and complex in their social interactions. I strongly disagree with these stereotypes, but I have spotted them repeatedly throughout my life. Someone using the method of constructing the illusion of a fake party in order…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:14 PM
2

Followers of Dawkins’s antics may remember the 2011 scandal wherein Rebecca Watson, founder of female-focused atheist site Skepchick, asked men to refrain from hitting on her while in an elevator because it made her uncomfortable. That is one of the most skewed representation of "ElevatorGate" (as it was known as at the time) that I have ever seen. it was part of a campaign to demonstrate how exceptionally sexist atheists conventions had become and how unsafe it was becoming for women to go ther…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:57 PM
5

FEMinism uses Female as their root. Men's Right Activist uses men. Why you blaming him, for in the context of this discussion that is based upon the names of those two, to use the corresponding gender terms, which would be FEMALE and MEN.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter