TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MikeFromBC Archive

View 9 posts and 212 comments by MikeFromBC on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Whoever wrote that is a modern day cuck. Fucking retard
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:48 AM
1

BLM is misguided. There is no wide spread issue of whites being racist against blacks.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:25 PM
-1

Yea, but when women say it, it's "ingrained misogyny." So it's not really their fault; they're just victims.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 06:11 PM
-1

Because people on Tinder are whores.
/r/seduction08/07/16 07:13 AM
2

All light beer tastes like sewage.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 03:55 AM
13

Men don't deserve praise for this. Individuals do.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:07 AM
2

In that case, choose whatever word you want and experiment. It's kind of fun. Inventor: A person, typically male, who creates new ideas or technologies. Scientist: A person, typically male, who is studying or has expert knowledge of one or more of the natural or physical sciences.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 08:46 AM
71

Let's hurt the patriarchy by screwing over a small business owner. Small businesses have so much institutional power./s The only reason they stole from this shop was because if they tried this shit in a retail chain they would get nabbed. Cowards.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:01 AM
7

She pushed him off a cliff sounds like she considered how to do it and how to get away with it. Sounds premeditated to me. Yes, it sounds premeditated to you. But it is next to impossible to prove that in court.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 11:00 PM
3

You're talking about feminism like it actually did good things for equality. It never did. It did good things for women. Big difference. If they cared about equality, they should have shouldered responsibility that men had. Men had the right to vote because they had responsibility. All feminism did was acquire the benefits without taking any responsibility.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:08 AM
2

I hate feminism as much as the next guy, but I've never seen a feminist say that.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:57 AM
0

Yea but let's be honest here. If there was a law restricting certain types of male genitalia that can be published, the government would just get overloaded with dick pics every day.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:19 PM
266

"Someone should probably say something." Yeah, she should. If she doesn't want his arm around her, then she should tell him. It's no one else's business.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:40 PM
9

Do you want to expound on this? Think of all the most prominent types of oppression. Was it body image in media? Or social expectations? No, it was legal discrimination. When feminism started, what were their first major goals? Giving women legal rights. Right to vote, right to serve in the military, etc. Legal discrimination is vastly more important a subject than, 'rape culture' and 'patriarchy'. It's easy to make everyone equal under law. It is not easy to change the opinion of an entire nati…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:00 AM
15

Same. It's weird isn't it? Most other questions or statements will garner a response. But when you bring up legal discrimination, your post becomes invisible.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 02:57 AM
3

What the fuck?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:13 PM
2

Oh okay.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:12 PM
8

You're going to be waiting a long time if you're expecting a legitimate example from a feminist.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:04 PM
4

I disagree, I think I'm perfectly on topic. If they identified as WRA's, then I would agree with you. However, the vast majority identify as feminists, while simultaneously claiming to be for equal rights.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:58 PM
9

Personally, I think female oppression is way worse. Are you talking about western society here? Because if you are you're wrong.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:03 PM
14

But at the same time, men synonymously have zero reproductive rights. So what fucking rights do these feminists think they have when they spout their nonsense? If feminists care about legal rights. How about providing legal protection from circumcision for men, removal of draft for men, and reproductive rights for men.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:02 PM
27

Women are slut shamed. Men are virgin shamed.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 03:50 AM
3

I think both genders excel at finding ways to humiliate others. For me personally though, it wasn't the kids throwing skittles at my face or calling me names that hurt the most. It was the girls who made fun of my tattered shoes, or just giggled along with the boys who kicked bottles at me.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 12:19 AM
1

Let's see them ban male pilots and then see how many people will fly on their jets.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 07:30 AM
12

The coworker timeline plummeted because of ridiculous sexual harassment laws. Can't fucking talk to a coworker about anything unrelated to work without worrying losing your job.
/r/seduction01/07/13 04:23 AM
6

(1) No matter how accomplished he is, a man is not truly complete as a person unless he has the love of a woman. Irrelevant question. To determine the validity of the answer, one must ask the equal, but opposite question; in regards to the opposite gender. Some people value relationships over others. It is not sexist unless one places value on gender over the other. (2) Many women are actually seeking special favors, such as hiring policies that favor them over men, under the guise of asking for…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:06 AM
2

I hope some angry family member takes her out. After the pregnancy of course. Cunt.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 05:31 PM
8

Nope, not even close. 10 years is not enough. Either life in prison, or suffer the same 3 month torture he was subjected to. Nothing else is fair.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:08 AM
4

This translates so well to (some forms of) feminism. Except replace the term hater with rapist or pedophile.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:48 AM
1

I'm not 100% sure, but isn't it actually considered fraud, or some sort of identity theft? I don't think it qualifies as rape, since the person consents to the act of sex.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:05 AM
6

In the case you provided I think the term you're looking for is blackmail, not manipulation. Manipulation doesn't really fit in your example. Yes, decisions adults make while drunk should be legal. If someone decides to gamble away their savings, or get married, it should be considered legal. If you take away the responibility for their actions, then they shouldn't be considered adults.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 10:13 PM
4

Can you give me one example of how someone would 'manipulate' another into sex to the point where it should be considered rape? Honestly, anyone who is of legal drinking age should be expected to act like adults and make their own decisions regardless of their sobriety.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 09:10 PM
11

It's NEVER that simple. What qualifies as coercion? By feminist standards, Jon Snow was raped in the TV series A Game of Thrones. He said no to repeated advances, then Ygritte uses the fact the he will be outed as a crow if he doesn't fuck her to coerce him. Yet how many people TRULY believe that Jon Snow was unwillingly raped? Probably close to 0. Because people actually expect men to act like adults. Jon Snow would be told, "Well if you didn't want to sleep with her, than you shouldn't have sl…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 07:19 AM
4

If it were three young lesbian girls from India that were tortured and killed for being gay, you would hear about it from feminist blogs and news sites. To think that feminism addresses men's issues is wildly idiotic.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:32 AM
2

Of course feminism is rape culture. Just look at everything they bring up; rape, sexual objectification, workplace harassment, marketing, and social pressures. Their points of contention are all about sex or physical appearance the majority of the time. To most of them, that's all that matters. I've even seen the opinion being thrown around that rape is worse than murder. Most don't care about other forms of objectification, anything that isn't sexual objectification doesn't matter to them. Most…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 07:29 AM
1

I have to agree with you here. Loved Joe Rogan until he made that tweet. He is usually very logical about his arguments. But stereotyping and acting kind of douchey on twitter is a huge turn off.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:32 AM
7

Until I see an updated source showing the history and federal funding up until now, then yes. Here's a post I made showing why.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:22 PM
14

The thing that cracks me up though, is that feminists and TwoXers were all up in arms about the war on women, and the fight to keep their rights. Meanwhile, men are legally being seen and registered and disposable fighting machines, but no one gives a shit. Talk about squeaky wheel getting the grease.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:20 PM
3

I like, "Welcome to the age of equality."
/r/MensRights03/11/12 05:31 AM
6

I agree with a lot of your points here. But I'd just like to jump into this debate you two are having and say that your attitude isn't helping. You can easily state your point of view without insults.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:14 AM
-1

I wouldn't call feminism a hate movement. I am anti-feminist because I believe that ideology actively discriminates against men, but I wouldn't call it a hate group. Feminism is sexist not misandrist.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:14 PM
1

Women dominate the lower paid positions. And men dominate the homeless positions. I win.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:51 AM
5

This is as open as a discussion gets. At least here, you won't be banned for offering a differing point of view. So you can either argue your points, and have their merit decided through common discourse; or you can fuck off.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:05 PM
0

That's also due to the fact that forced envelopment is not considered rape. Also, I would think that men are less likely to classify drunk or regretful sex as rape, because Feminism has gone out of its way to conflate rape statistics.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:32 AM
1

Yeah, this attitude makes me sick. "We`re your allies, and we do want to help you with issues faced by men. But first we want you to accept our dogma and admit that our problems are much more important."
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:26 AM
-1

There is a vast difference between the second class and the protected class. Were children allowed to vote our fight wars? No they weren't. Women were no more oppressed than children were. They were granted less agency because of their protected status. Fighting wars and working countless hours to provide for ones family is hardly a privilege.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:19 AM
1

I've clearly spent too much time on other subreddits. I'm used to obvious assholes getting banned. It's meh. I can understand it. I'll deal with it.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:16 AM
-2

Did you get here late? There was an argument: 1 And if you noticed, I did not use his misogyny to discount his actual argument. I said to downvote him even if you agree with him, because he's a misogynist who should be banned. I am perfectly willing to hold regular discourse with people who aren't misogynists: 2
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:14 AM
1

No thank you. I will call them out where I see them. I dislike misogyny, I dislike racism and I dislike misandry.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:42 AM
5

First, I've yet to see actual data that shows this disparity. You seem to think that it's akin to comparing playing on the sidewalk, where the chances of a vehicle passing across that area are next to none; to playing in the middle of the road, where the chances of a vehicle passing is guaranteed 24/7. Is cunnilingus more likely to pass an STD by 5%? 10%? Even if you were twice as likely to get infected, it is irrelevant. It is good advice for both genders to have protected sex, period. If you s…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 12:21 AM
1

He's a misogynist piece of shit. Look at his post history, he's a bigot. I didn't know r/MR accepted shit like this. It is generally true that women do not respond well to reasoned arguments. You are a white knight. Feel free to stay, but try to be a little more mature. Women are crazy especially when drunk. :) Truth be told, women were much happier with traditional sex roles. Well except for a few ugly, nasty women like the suffragettes (early feminists). Feminism has always been a movement tha…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 12:16 AM
-5

I urge everyone reading this person to downvote him, even if you agree with him. He's a douche bag, look no further than his post history for proof. Truthman2000: You made two mistakes. 1) You tried to talk to a woman about men's issues. 2) You tried to convince a woman with logic. Neither of these behaviors is likely to be productive.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:24 PM
0

I think that making a distinction between the two is rather pointless. Because you are dealing with a risk of STD's; it's equally important that both genders avoid unprotected sex with untested partners. Hypothetically, if having anal sex with an infected person was 20% safer than having vaginal sex; I would fail to find a reason to make that distinction. Saying that it's good advice to not have anal sex with an infected person, but it's especially good advice not to have vaginal sex with them j…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:02 PM
7

It's either good advice or it isn't. It's good advice to not commit to any form of unprotected sex with a partner who hasn't been tested to STD's. It seems wrong to put more importance on one form of oral sex. In my opinion, it would be like saying FGM should be especially banned over MGM, even though both are wrong.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:49 PM
3

It is especially good advice for both genders...
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:25 PM
2

I just don't fucking care what you guys think anymore. You should aim to make your general statements more inclusive. There are women that use this subreddit as well you know.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:28 PM
2

It's okay!
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:01 PM
3

I thought you said you were going to start documenting those kind of posts. LOL
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:54 PM
3

I disagree with you on that one. I think men put their lives of their SO before their own more than women do. I'm not saying the latter doesn't happen, and I'm not saying it's the fault of men or women; it's just the result of societal expectations. Men are raised with movies about heroes and knights protecting their loved ones; and women are raised with stories about princesses and heroines who are saved and protected by them. It's an over-simplification, but I think it has some accuracy.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:46 PM
6

Female =/= Feminist.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 12:46 AM
7

Bravo. Great post.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 11:01 PM
3

The equal but opposite sexual expectation placed on men is the fact that they are seen as less for not having sex. Women are valued for their virginity while men are not. The opposite being, obviously, the status of women who sleep around a lot vs. that of men.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:41 AM
4

Personally I feel the opposite. Not sure how popular of an opinion it is. But I would rather see one thousand criminals walk free, than see just one innocent person suffer.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 10:12 PM
6

You can tell she gets all flustered and angry as soon as he suggests otherwise, something tells me she would have gone into rage mode if she wasn't on camera.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:06 AM
1

If the father never consented to parenthood, then there's no fucking way he should have to pay for someone elses choice. But in the scenario where a father consents to parenthood, I think child support is necessary. However, the system itself needs to be fixed. Too often the courts base the amount the man has to pay on what fits the woman's lifestyle. The man (or woman) should be able to choose where the money goes themself. (ie: Instead of giving the other parent money to buy clothes and food, …
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:57 PM
5

I think your suggestion is very valid. But there are two problems I'd like to point out, if I may. A) Male violence is already being exposed every where you look. There is no short of society telling us that men commit crimes and do bad things. B) What Mens Rights wants to accomplish is the removal of gender from crimes. There is no reason to speak out on violence against women or violence against men; but just violence in general. We don't want people to say, "Stop mothers from killing their ch…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 12:34 AM
50

Besides, I don't care about money -- that stuff comes and goes -- but I would like someone who automatically walks on the outside of the sidewalk, in case a New York taxicab should fly over the curb and graze one of us (yes, someone who's willing to take a grazing for me). Or a man who puts his hand on the small of my back as he opens the door to a restaurant, and guides me in, like Cary Grant would do. I know where the door is, but shouldn't it be him catching swine flu, not me? Is that so horr…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 07:48 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, I think voluntary taxes, or something similar, would be a step in the right direction. But trying to get the government to consider it is a waste of time. It would be like a CEO of a company giving himself minimum wage, there is no way the U.S. is going to limit it's income; especially in it's current economic state.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 09:59 PM
1

It seems a fair point, especially for religious people, but I don't see his argument holding up at all. For example, this article expresses that religious people don't want their money going to fund abortion services. (Or other services that go against their religion) I can understand that. However, what about people who don't support the war, but are still forced to pay for it? What about people who don't want to have their taxes going into public education? Will we be allowed to dictate exactl…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 09:27 PM
3

I don't think banning them will help. They will most likely create other accounts and continue their behaviour. I think the r/MensRights community is good at identifying and down-voting trolls. It's not that I'm opposed to banning them, it's just that I don't have much faith that it is an effective solution. Whatever the mods think is best is fine by me, as long as r/MR doesn't turn into SRS.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:30 AM
1

It must be a code as to the whereabouts of her location. We must figure it out, we must save her!
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:00 AM
3

I agree with you. Car insurance rates should be based off driver history. Health and Life insurance should be an equal rate.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 03:05 AM
3

This is like the male version of Cosmopolitan. *vomits Oh, and this doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:57 AM
14

Great video, it's clear, concise, short and to the point. But I'm going to assume that some feminists will ignore this kind of reasoning as always.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:51 PM
2

I don't really believe in 'right' vs 'left'. I believe in right vs wrong. Makes things much easier.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:19 AM
18

I'll just do a quick summary, I don't feel like going in-depth. Selective service: Men (at least in the U.S.) have to sign up for the draft once they reach 18 years of age. If they do not sign up for the draft, they lose certain rights and privileges. Such as: not being able to work for the government, not being able to drive in certain states, refused to take out college loans, and even be refused a passport. Circumcision: Young boys are not protected from genital mutilation, while young girls …
/r/MensRights25/03/12 10:12 PM
3

I agree. These memes and rage comics are entertaining at times, but they would fit best somewhere else.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 09:42 PM
1

I disagree with this sentiment. I think this will give men and women the wrong idea when the come to r/MensRights. This meme addresses no injustice or social issue that men face.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 09:39 PM
2

For the small chance that this is a genuine post, here are some tips. Keep them trimmed. Wash daily (obvious) Try putting baby powder underneath your scrotum after you wash. (If you have issues with smell) Try not to wear stuff that is too tight
/r/MensRights25/03/12 01:30 AM
3

Also, don't be afraid to save this post. You can just link to it when people start defending or arguing in favour of VAWA. Or you could just favourite the official link and save it for when needed: VAWA: History and Federal Funding Thanks again r/MR
/r/MensRights24/03/12 11:20 PM
2

Thanks for the compliment. :)
/r/MensRights24/03/12 11:16 PM
4

They banned you because they're psychos. In r/MensRights, we try not to link to anything about SRS, because they are a troll group. There is no point trying to reason with them, or engage in any kind of discussion.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 11:02 PM
8

I know the title is a tad bit over the top; but it is fair none the less. I got into a tiny discussion with someone about how VAWA is discriminatory of men. Their general stance was that VAWA, even though sexist by name, still helps both male and female victims of domestic abuse equally (with a few ad hominem attacks thrown in, naturally). I spent about half an hour writing up my response, and felt that the response itself would be good to post in r/MensRights to shine a light on just how VAWA d…
/r/MensRights24/03/12 06:25 PM
3

Huffington Post will actually approve all posts as long as they don't contain offensive words or personal attacks. So, they're good in that sense.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 08:17 PM
2

I'm with you, but I don't even think objective data would make this relevant. Even if both genders were observed, and women with more sexual partners were more likely to get divorced, it would be irrelevant. MensRights should be a place to observe, discuss and analyze societal and legal injustices that men face. If it were about how men lost more assets in a divorce (which does happen) or if they lose custody more (which is a problem) then it would be relevant.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 01:28 AM
2

Yea, r/MensRights is similar to other feminist subreddits in that way. You get posts that are about issues and problems that men or women face in society. Problems that can or should be changed. Then there are subjects like these that are brought up, which only seem to create a divide and pointless bickering between groups. Even if it were true that women cheated more, why point it out? It is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 12:36 AM
5

I don't want to come accross as an asshole here, but how is the relevant; like, at all?
/r/MensRights22/03/12 11:29 PM
6

That's when you say, "Don't flatter yourself." Then walk away without saying anything else.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 11:22 PM
3

You forgot this, I'll just leave it here. TL;DR: I have no idea what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 03:06 AM
7

Here are some more (sexist) definitions. Domestic Violence Sexist Sexism Sexual Harassment Molestation Circumcision
/r/MensRights22/03/12 02:06 AM
5

This is essentially what I'm thinking as well. I'd still like to know Planned Parenthood's official stance on the matter though, even though it's a pretty obvious guess.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 01:43 AM
4

You should see self proclaimed skeptical atheist site: Skepchick.org; it's even worse. shivers
/r/MensRights22/03/12 12:41 AM
6

Can someone give me a few examples of what a 'feminist apologist' is; because I'm not sure what the OP is trying to get at. Probably because he seems batshit insane. Can we not have a space for male discussion without female influence? . I don't personally agree with homosexuality as I believe it weakens us as males . Yes I do hate feminists edit: This isn't SRS (thank god), I disagree with banning posters as long they are not hostile.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 05:47 AM
1

People need to stop downvoting themountaingoat, because he's right. It takes a bigger brain to run a man's body, because of his build, (ie. larger muscle mass, longer/bigger limbs) It takes more brain power to run it, it has nothing to do with intelligence. Male and female brains also function slightly differently. Where men generally have more spacial awareness, women have more social skills. This also has nothing to do with MensRights. Things that are relative to MRAs are things that have the …
/r/MensRights21/03/12 03:10 AM
63

I'd kind of like to see their reaction to your post. lol
/r/MensRights20/03/12 01:28 AM
1

A good man is just a good person who happens to be a man. That's all there is to it.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 08:30 PM
2

This proves nothing. If it were the other way around, I know most people here would dismiss it, and rightfully so. Women (and men) should not be judged as a group.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:40 PM
3

I think you are being a little cynical, which isn't a bad thing. But there is something I want to point out. Doesn't it suck when women (and other men) use male stereotypes to judge men, and the motivations behind their actions? You should put aside what you think they want from you, and just be friendly. Talk with all them like you would any other person. If you begin to fancy one of them, maybe go on a date or two. Most people are not the same as they were in high-school. Hell, Looking back ju…
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:35 PM
6

LOL, one of the people in the comments said it best. Seventeen pairs, two tests each, only one dose of a trivial amount of oral (least effective form)? You can't draw conclusions from that small a group and real researchers would know that.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:18 PM
1

As long as you were there you could testify in his defense. If what you said is the truth, I doubt she will be sucessful.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 07:22 AM
2

And how do they control women? By using men who are already controlled.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:13 AM
2

Now she says she knows she was wrong but admits she was drunk and lost control. She says her life has been tough these days, “My house got condemned I became recently homeless, I haven’t been working.” Doesn't matter if your whole family died in a plane crash. An emotional or depressed state does not excuse violence against another person. “Hopefully I can eventually meet this guy and give him a hug and a big, fat, wet kiss on the cheek and say sorry.” Like he wants a fucking hug and a kiss. I c…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:23 AM
8

Funny how the SPLC releases the names of websites which they think are misogynistic, without providing a list of sites that they think are misandric. Calling that website a sexist piece of biased horse-shit would be a compliment.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:22 PM
2

If there's anything we shouldn't be forced to pay for, birth control is pretty low on the list. I would rather not have to fund a false war in the middle east, or the war on drugs.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:10 PM
1

Title is incredibly dishonest. Both men and women have privilege. And 'women' have not legally augmented their privilege, feminists have.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:58 AM
12

I am female, and that puts me in a vulnerable position This one made me lol. I think 2X is great. But the replies in that one post just made me fucking *headesk
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:53 AM
1

I don't identify as a feminist or an MRA. I like to consider myself an anarchist. Which is the ideology that no person should have power over another. This includes all forms of sexism, racism, other isms and power hierarchies.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:32 AM
2

The compound can be injected using a no-scalpel procedure into the vasa deferentia NOPE
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:48 AM
13

I think it's a privilege how these women are able to take photos of men's crotches without being labeled perverts. When men would be ostracized for snapping a photo of a woman's crotch in public without her consent. And women can sit with their legs apart if they want. How fucking ironic.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:23 AM
1

I wouldn't call them cowards. Scared is probably a better word. Cowards are people who are too afraid to do something, but still expect others to do it for them. edit: For example, if someone is too scared to fight in a war, they are not a coward. However, if they expect others to fight in their place, then they are.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:18 AM
3

Bunch of harpies.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:16 AM
5

Title is an exaggeration; or at least a little misleading. There are a select few sexists who are posting a lot of comments. Most of 2X is very positive IMO.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 01:47 AM
2

If you're objective is to point out that most men are more physically capable than most women, then it's a stupid point. Men and women have evolved the way we have which was best fit for survival. A person's physical capabilities does not determine their worth as an individual.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:00 AM
10

Yes I would definitely call that rape. You did not give consent. Plus he knew you were asleep when he initiated sexual contact.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:49 AM
3

Obvious troll. It's quite clear that the vast majority of people on r/MR think you're an asshole.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:42 AM
0

It's an easy way to discredit your oppositions views without making an actual counter-argument. It's a cop-out. You will see straw-man, gas lighting, ad hominem and mansplainer used alongside troll.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:07 PM
9

Skepchick.org (home of the infamous Rebecca Watson) December 12th, 2011. Sacrificing Privilege by Natalie. Actual quote from long time contributor Natalie. My experiences, as I’ve interpreted them, have made it clear to me that male privilege is a very real thing, and “female privilege” is not. February 6th, 2012. Seeing the Patriarchy by Rebecca Watson. Actual quote from long time commenter Marilove. Furthermore, you cannot be sexist toward men. Sexism can hurt men, but you cannot be sexist tow…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 12:18 AM
2

Same could be said about a man's underwear. Not sure this belongs here.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 05:18 AM
0

I read that entire thread, and lots of her recent posts. She is only the victim of her own choices. Any man in her situation would never define it as rape, because it does not merit that title. If a woman kept initiating sexual contact, and he finally gave in, he would not label it rape. If a man regretted the sex afterwards he would chalk it up to his bad decisions and excessive drinking. He would no doubt take full responsibility for his actions. This is just another example of how society fee…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:47 PM
24

Why is this shit being upvoted? Look at this shit quote: The sad truth is that a lot of them are simply vermin. How the fuck are a lot of women vermin? Does it piss you off when people say most men are evil, are most men are pigs? Yet you feel justified by spouting this garbage.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:20 AM
17

Pussy pass.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 01:04 AM
1

A lot of people are saying elderly, disable, and children first. I disagree. Firstly, most ships have enough life boats to save everyone. So waiting to get the elderly, disabled and children on first will only slow things down and threaten the lives of everyone. In a case where there aren't enough life boats, I think priority should go by age, and age alone. Start with children, then teens, then young adults, etc.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 05:10 AM
2

I agree with the severity of this punishment, since no sexual contact was made. Whether a man would have gotten the same punishment is up for debate, but as a single case; the punishment fits the crime.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 05:08 AM
-2

No.
/r/seduction31/12/11 09:03 PM
2

"People who say that feminism is about equality have some major misconceptions about what feminism actually is. Feminism is not a state of being. It's not something you just are like you might be an jew or a homosexual. It is an ideological movement. Ideological movements are movements that are concerned with ideas. Feminism is comprised of ideas and theories and hypotheses. These ideas can be evaluated on their individual veracity and then accepted or dismissed. And over time common threads are…
/r/MensRights29/12/11 12:41 AM
5

This article is a flop of shit. They’re part of the an after-school program called Men of Strength (MOST) that teaches boys they should be allies for girls and that violence is inexcusable. No, you're teaching them that only men are rapists. Not only does this create a cognitive dissonance in the minds of young boys; where they feel they have to look out and protect women. It creates a cognitive dissonance in young girls as well; where they're basically told all men are potential rapists and wom…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 10:13 PM
2

tl;dr Feminism isn't about equality. I agree
/r/MensRights16/12/11 11:36 PM
1

Yes, that is what I meant. There was no victim (except for the family of course) but no one was punished.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 11:23 PM
1

You're starting to sound like a feminist.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 07:51 PM
3

I'm just stating my opinion on the matter. In fact, I will actually go far as to say that prison should only be for those who commit acts of violence, in my opinion. It doesn't seem like a just punishment. She needs rehabilitation and psychological help, not a prison cell.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 07:37 PM
8

I think if she accused an actual person of rape then she should face the same sentence. But since she did not accuse someone and just made up a mysterious attacker, it isn't quite the same.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 06:53 PM
1

No gender is "exploited more". How do you even measure exploitation? The fact is both genders are "exploited" (whatever the fuck that means.) equally in porn.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 07:36 AM
4

I actaully think that most posters of twoX are very competent. It's mostly r/feminism and r/feminisms that make me roll my eyes.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 07:19 PM
3

a) It's a joke, real violence is never funny. b) If violence against men is comedic in media, then why can't violence against women be so as well?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 11:20 PM
1

I agree and disagree. I realize what you're getting at though. with the under-representation of men in certain jobs, it creates a social dissonance. Think of it this way. There is almost no scenario where only one gender is affected. I'm bad at explaining things but I will try. Say a feminist is claiming that society is sexist against women because it portrays them as the weaker sex. They will most likely (from personal experience) argue for only one side of the equation. They usually aren't wro…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 11:19 PM
1

I agree with everything you said, except this Also,the fact that women are underrepresented in STEM's doesn't demonstrably harm women in any way. Great reply though!
/r/MensRights25/11/11 07:16 AM
2

I found the comments to be quite funny as well.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 10:10 PM
1

I'll never take the desire for more women in tech seriously until they want to equalize all jobs. Where are the campaigns to get more women into truck driving, mining, or trash removal? Also, stop using the fact that you're a girl to gain more views. Whether it's "girl plays guitar" or "girl playing halo". No one cares that you're a girl.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 09:05 PM
7

Then shouldn't this ray of logic be applied to women as well. "If all women don't want kids, just keep your legs shut." Okay buddy...
/r/MensRights22/11/11 08:12 PM
15

The cost of raising a child in a loveless relationship is worse.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 08:00 PM
8

Divorce. And don't feel bad about it to. Sexuality is a huge part of most peoples identity. I wouldn't spend another minute trying to convince her either. Make an appointment with the lawyer today.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 07:59 PM
1

While I disagree with circumcision as a practice. That picture looks fake.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 07:22 AM
7

"This document acknowledges many thousands of years of dominance of masculine power, and offers an apology for the suppression of women, in the spirit of a fresh start." An apology for what? Gender roles that were best fitted for the survival of early developing societies and technology? But for the sake of argument, if men have to apologize to women, then shouldn't women do the same?
/r/MensRights21/11/11 06:47 AM
2

Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children. Teenagers are not prepubescent. There is a huge difference in being attracted to an 8 year old girl, or being attracted to a developing teenager. Think of it this way. Puberty is nature's age of consent.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 08:07 PM
9

People will let the government pass anything when, "ItZ 4 teH ChildrENZ."
/r/MensRights11/11/11 06:17 PM
1

iRobot reference ftw. I need to watch that movie again.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 07:48 AM
15

Refuse offer. Record and save all conversations with her. Spend time with your awesome kid. Profit.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:49 PM
12

It seems like that gentlemen version is all about pleasing your woman. And the ladies version is all about validating ones self. What a joke.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:38 PM
0

fyi I'm not a pedophile.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:39 AM
-2

Actually for girls it is usually around 12, for boys it's around 13. EDIT: Never mind, I didn't notice that you said complete puberty. I think I should make myself clearer, since the range of puberty is pretty big. It is my opinion that girls and boys should be considered legal when she starts menstruating, and he can have an erection and is able to ejaculate. Wow, this convo is awkward lol.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 10:21 PM
3

I agree with you. Age of consent should be after puberty in my opinion.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 06:36 PM
3

Calm down feminists. This is a chance for women to empower themselves. Get a job, and pay for your own shit, there is nothing more independent than that.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 05:53 AM
2

I agree, genetic and robotic engineering FTW. However, I don't think it belongs in this sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 03:11 AM
0

I just don't vote. Period.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:59 PM
2

Of course. I understand that you, among others, don't want to be in a relationship with a liar. I just wanted to throw in my opinion on the matter.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 02:14 AM
-6

But why? If you're attracted to a trans, there is nothing you can do about it. Your instincts, or physical attraction, are not in your control. If your subconscious finds another human being sexually appealing, than why would you be so closed off to the idea of sex? I've had this discussion with friends. And the most common theme I get is, "Dude, I'm not gay." It seems like they are so scared of how they are viewed by other men, that they think other might call them gay if they have sex with som…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 09:04 PM
-2

I can understand that it's probably the correct thing to do for a trans to tell the men that they are, indeed, a trans. But I don't think they should be obliged whatsoever. If you, a man, find a trans (that you don't know is a trans) attractive enough to sleep with; then what's the problem? If you, a man, can tell the difference when they take off their pants; then you can refuse to have sex. If you, a man, can't tell the difference when they take of their pants; what's the problem? I hook up wi…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 07:44 PM
1

The fact is that the definition of emotional abuse is so vague. For fucks sales forgetting to take out the garbage could be argued as emotional abuse. And no amount of emotional abuse gives someone the right to physically abuse another.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 05:39 AM
2

You also said the mother was beaten.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 08:26 PM
4

The daughter never said the mother was beaten. the judge's wife was emotionally abused herself and was severely manipulated into assisting the beating So the mother was emotionally abused whatever that means. So stop trying to make the mother a victim. You can't excuse her actions based on a past of emotional abuse. Could the father excuse his actions if he was emotionally abused as a child? No, they're both adults.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 07:14 PM
3

Yeah my bad. I assumed it was a mental disability by the way it sounded.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 07:11 PM
24

The judge's wife was emotionally abused herself and was severely manipulated into assisting the beating and should not be blamed for any content in this video. First off, she wasn't manipulated in this video to assist in the beating in any way. She went out of her way to partake in it. Secondly, the daughter may have forgiven her mom. But if it is so easy to suggest that the mom was manipulated, then, couldn't one suggest that the daughter was manipulated by the mother? I'm sure that the mother …
/r/MensRights02/11/11 06:37 AM
2

Unless she actually grabs your penis, there isn't much harassment going on. (In the legal sense) If you tell her to stop and she still does it, then it will become harassment.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 07:39 AM
12

Sorry but I can't feel bad for him. If a girl was grabbing a man's cock and he stabbed her with a pencil I honestly wouldn't give a shit.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 10:55 PM
8

Holy shit man, and I thought I had a bad day. Only thing I'd like to add, is that you record every encounter you have with her. Buy a tape recorder or something similar, and record all conversations. Good luck man.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 04:05 AM
2

"I find it bizarre that many people in here are homophobic or otherwise unhappy with the association of LGBT rights. " I was unaware of this, as I have yet to see any homophobic slander. But, let me be the first to say, if someone has any problem with homosexuals, they can right fuck off out of here.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 10:43 PM
2

^ Pro-tip Just be yourself. Being a "Zeta Male" means nothing. Being a kind and loving person on the other hand.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 07:02 PM
1

I have to agree a tiny bit with BadWolf. Nothing irritates me more than feminists taking media so seriously. You have to remember that every negative way media portrays men, it portrays women in a negative way somewhere else. The best thing to do when she said, "If you ever hit mommy and me" Would be to just tell her that you'd never even think about it, and that you would do nothing to hurt your child that means everything to you.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:54 PM
3

I thought I had a good time in Mexico until I found out that I had been raped. My memories are now filled with terror.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:48 PM
32

I like how she speaks as if she has a penis.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 06:29 AM
8

Fuck, I wanted to leave planet Earth when I read that stupid self-masturbatory blog. Sometimes people can surprise you with how much they suck.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 06:01 AM
7

You were right up until the point where you call the flesh-light pathetic. Every criticism you gave for it could be applied to vibrators as well. I do agree that there are more than enough sex toys for men out there. And that men should consider anal play more. You need to work on your arguments.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:52 AM
10

My opinion? Hell yes. Scenario 1: "As a man who doesn't want a child, I wish to not be held financially (and in all sense of the word, become a slave) responsible for this child." "Well then you should have kept it in your pants." <----Accepted thing to say in today's society. Scenario 2: "As a woman who doesn't want a child, I wish to have the right to abort this child." "Well then, you should have thought about that before you spread your legs." <----Unacceptable comment. Misogynist.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 06:32 AM
2

Thumbs'd up almost everyone here. Great points.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:02 PM
7

What a piece of shit human being.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:53 AM
29

"I was in a class of nine- and 10-year-olds, girls and boys, and this young woman was telling these kids that the reason for wars was the innately violent nature of men." If we're going to shift all the blame on men for war. Then should we not say that men are also responsible for all the good things, for all the technological advancements, infrastructure, etc. No, because that would be sexist wouldn't it? Fucking feminists man.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:51 AM
12

If you didn't read the article, here's a tl'dr All men are rapists, blah blah blah, I have a vagina look at me, blah blah blah, women are angels, blah blah blah, I was dropped as a child.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 03:10 AM
0

Basically, when a women gets pregnant, she has two choices. Either she keeps the baby (no abortion) or she doesn't keep the baby (abortion). Now if a man gets a woman pregnant, he should have two options as well. He should be able to keep the baby (offer child support) or he doesn't keep the baby (doesn't offer child support) Seems only fair.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 10:02 PM
2

I agree that those who say we live in a patriarchy are morons, with a few exceptions of course. (some middle eastern countries.) EDIT: By the way, if you type "define rape" or "rape definition" into Google. It comes up with this, "The crime, committed by a man, of forcing another person to have sexual intercourse with him, esp. by the threat or use of violence."
/r/MensRights19/10/11 09:22 PM
-1

If the father has no real say in the woman's choice when she gets pregnant, then why should he be responsible? If the woman gets pregnant, she has options. The man can do nothing. So the couple agrees to use a condom, both parties try to prevent pregnancy, but it breaks and the mother gets pregnant. If the father already stated his desires of not wanting a baby, is it fair that he has zero say in a choice that could affect the next 18 years of his life?
/r/MensRights19/10/11 08:08 PM
-1

Fair point. I just think men have too little power when it comes to random sexual encounters. Even if all forms of birth control are taken, and she ends up pregnant, there is nothing he can do. And the women can take similar steps, but if she does get pregnant, she has all the control and the man is subject to the decision she makes. Which could result in him becoming a slave for 18 years. EDIT: Sexual encounters pretty much become a gamble for men. It's a gamble for women too, however they have…
/r/MensRights19/10/11 06:48 AM
1

Articles like this are so god damn pointless.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 05:53 AM
-1

If neither of them wanted it, then abort it. I'm sorry, but didn't I already answer this question? I don't think the man should be held liable. If birth control is used, it is basically a man's way of saying he wants nothing to do with pregnancy. He just wants to enjoy the pleasures of the act, and that's it. By putting on a condom, or asking a woman to use the pill, he is basically making an agreement with his partner that he doesn't want to pay for a child. Therefore, if the woman does get pre…
/r/MensRights19/10/11 05:45 AM
1

When finding out you're pregnant you should. A) Tell the father. B) If he wants to be part, and help raise the child, great. C) If he doesn't want to help raise the child, you have a few options. Raise it yourself, or with help from your family. Or abort. D) If you decide to force the father to help, which is a current legal option, then go ahead. I however, think it's morally wrong to force a man to pay for a child he doesn't want to, under certain circumstances. Let me explain. If the man, dur…
/r/MensRights19/10/11 05:10 AM
0

I have no problem with how they portray women on TV. Be it bitchy, stupid, slutty. Who fucking cares, it's TV.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 03:12 AM
2

Same her Darkling. As soon as I saw the victim card, I fucking X'd that shit.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 02:37 AM
4

I don't quite understand the point of this post. Why do some women marry domestic abusers? Why do some men marry gold diggers? It's because there are an equal amount of shitty people in both genders. I'm confused as to what the point of this post was.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 02:10 AM
2

If I can recall correctly, common law couples, (Non-married but living together) have similar separation laws. (i.e after a certain amount of time, if you separate, you may still have to give up a % of your wealth.) I'm not 100% sure though, you should look it up.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 10:37 PM
4

wavevector made a great point. thingsarebad made a good point as well. However, I wouldn't use that. Even though it's true, as soon as you say it you will become a misogynist in their eyes. Personally, I would tell, whomever, that suffering is subjective. I would tell them that denying the suffering of an entire gender is inherently sexist. And that suffering is unique to each individual, regardless of gender. For every man that benefits from sexism, there is one who suffers from it. It is the s…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 11:21 PM
9

66% of the world's work? How is that measured? If you think women do most of the work ask yourself these questions. Who built the computer your reading this on? Who built the factory your computer was made in? Who built the house you're living in? Who transported materials for building your house? Who built the roads those materials are transported on? Who drilled the oil those vehicles use? Who built the equipment used to drill oil? I can agree with this issue. As women with actual problems in …
/r/MensRights10/10/11 08:13 AM
2

I realize that it's a comfort woman. But I don't know what your point is. This post is an example to feminists of female privilege, which they seem to forget exists. Try thinking about it this way. If an equal amount of men and women are drafted, there would most likely be a huge drop in comfort women. As female sex slaves would have better protection from female soldiers. Do you think a female soldier would support a male soldier who keeps a comfort woman? I don't think so. PS: I'm against the …
/r/MensRights10/10/11 06:22 AM
3

Nice link train. You have a point to make? Your links can't argue for you.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 06:00 AM
3

Can I ask you when forcing a teenager to do anything has ever worked? You need to use your brain.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 05:39 AM
5

Yes barbadosslim, great point. Because we all know males are immune to bullets. WTFIDIOT
/r/MensRights10/10/11 05:35 AM
1

tyrghast you're an idiot. Your feeble, infantile brain makes me laugh. If there was a war, I'd rather have a 100lb woman with one leg beside me, than a fucking idiot sexist like you.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 05:33 AM
7

Dude, I have a size 0 sister, and I wouldn't want her to be forced into war either. But I also have an older brother. Just because he is big, it doesn't affect my opinion at all. I think the point is, no one should be forced into war.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 05:29 AM
5

Is there a point to this? If there is, it seems kind of vague.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 05:27 AM
1

As a brother to four sisters, I couldn't care less. One of my biggest annoyances with the majority of feminists I come across, is their ability to be offended by everything. They seem to chalk everything up to a personal attack against their gender. If I came across women talking about their baby daddies, I'd just feel bad for the kids. I'd chalk them up to being shitty people, and then laugh at how incapable and feeble their minds truly are.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 07:57 AM
2

I agree. It's like reverse racism. I'm part native. And I hear a lot of, "The white man did this, blah blah blah..." They're being racist/sexist without even knowing it. It can really get on your nerves sometimes.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 07:41 AM
2

I would say the label anarchist is well suited, as that's what I am. But the label anarchist also goes as far as to oppose all forms of hierarchies. Which include governments that you may personally think are necessary. If you can't find a label, don't worry, you don't really need one. Labels refer to ideological movements. The belief in equality is a state of mind. Therefore, one can believe in equality and not be a feminist.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 07:39 AM
3

Cunt. Need I say more?
/r/MensRights08/10/11 06:43 AM
1

yea. My regular screen name is MikeFromCanada but that was taken
/r/MensRights07/10/11 01:48 AM
1

Yes, lol, I'm from BC
/r/MensRights07/10/11 01:15 AM
3

Agreed. I'm part native. And nothing pisses me off more than natives blaming their loser, reservation lives on the "white man". Like they can claim moral superiority just because they're native. Yeah, our people got fucked over, but that shit is the past. Demanding benefits from the government for natives just perpetuates this counter-racism moral bullshit. Not sure if what I said makes sense, but it did in my head.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 12:08 AM
4

This doesn't offend me. What pisses me off the most is when feminists over react to shit like this. For example, if a feminist hears someone say, "Men are better drivers." they would probably flip. But who gives a shit? How does it affect your life in any way? So what if some people think women are worse drivers. Is it somehow going to affect the way you drive? No. That's what I think about some of these reactions. Who cares. It's a stupid study with a pointless conclusion. So what if more men a…
/r/MensRights06/10/11 11:57 PM
1

Charge her for one count of aggravated assault. Charge him for multiple counts of aggravated assault. Everyone learns a lesson.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 12:09 AM
2

A little warning to men and women. You kick me in the nuts, I break your leg.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 09:05 PM
3

I fucking hate it. When you argue with them, they don't argue with the facts or opinions you present. They argue with the fact that you even dare present them at all. Fucking hate (most) feminists.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 03:27 AM
0

Because the feminist movement would lobby against that. They'd scream and bitch that all women are pure and innocent.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:27 PM
7

Equal opportunity =/= Equal outcome
/r/MensRights27/09/11 02:05 AM
3

All feminism has done is shown men that feminists can't be taken seriously. If a man is beaten with a bat by his wife they don't lift an eyebrow, they probably think he deserved it. If a woman is beaten they fucking jump out of the wood-works. They all talk like they want to be treated equally, but when the ship starts to sink it's, "Women and children first."
/r/MensRights25/09/11 04:00 AM
2

Feminism is not a state of mind, it is a movement. Therefore not believing in feminism does not mean you don't believe in equality. Ignorant feminist.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 03:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter