TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Miliean Archive

View 1 post and 64 comments by Miliean on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
37

Miliean/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:24 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

I'd love to see the experiment repeated and really documented this time. Reality TV format, with diary room style interview clips with her lady self. The main reason is that lots of people have seen this clip, but it's fundamentally unsatisfying. I'm left with the feeling that there's significantly more to tell but that they're just not going to bother telling it. They need to spend a long time on the set up, the places she visits are not necessarily representative of the whole experience. I wan…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:37 PM
6

I think it was much less about the women than it was about her being a shitty manager. I've read several articles about her and it seems like she expected to hire women and then not have to act like a manager. At every point, every indication something was wrong, she failed to do ANYTHING about the issues. Her failing was not hiring all women. Her failing is that she expected to hire a bunch of humans and not have to manage them.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 04:42 AM
7

It'll be a disaster if she win's the nomination. Republicans HATE her, so few people will jump ship to vote democrat for her. Women tend to love her, because they want a women in the white house and were so close last time around. Democrat men don't give her as much of a "women in the white house" bonus. So they tend to evaluate her more on her record and policy.. and it's not that good. Over the next year and a half she shine will ware off her. She's not that good a speaker, so some of the wome…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:10 PM
2

That's my secrete motivation. I would LOVE to be a stay at home dad. Cooking and cleaning are things I enjoy doing. Raising children is difficult but rewarding. Sounds like a nice job. Pay is shit tho so it's a non-option for reality.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 04:21 AM
4

I've seen that among my friends as well. But I can tell you that they tended to have conversations about "what she wanted" from the very beginning. That gives the illusion that it's some kind of choice. The guys kind of say that they want her to work, and she reassures them that's what she wants anyway. So that's where the discussion stops. In the inverse. I've broken up with people because when we had that conversation I've said "I refuse to be involved in a single income relationship. It's OK …
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:19 AM
-2

Except, that's not going to be a viable solution. Divide assets 50/50. If men do not want to be with stay at home partners, then don't date women who want that. If someone in an already established relationship insists on it, then end the relationship. Alimony, is fucked up in many ways. One of them is that someone in the above situation would likely receive it. But in terms of actual assets, divide them 50/50 because the choice to be in a relationship with a stay at home partner was made by bot…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:47 AM
0

Except, 70% of liquid and 50% ownership is likely damn close to 50% of the total. Yet it's a deal that allows him to maintain control. Considering this was no flash in the pan marriage, after all it lasted 32 years. As long as there's no almond, it's a solid deal considering. And given the decline of his career, that's going to be worth less and less over time.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:36 AM
4

If campus rape is such a problem If campus rape is such a problem, why, when you control for age, are women who are students LESS likely to be raped than those who are not. Not saying rape is not a problem, I actually believe that it is. However we cannot drive forward when faced with evidence to the contrary. Women who attend post secondary studies are LESS likely to be raped during their time as a student than women who did not choose to attend school. There is no campus rape culture because t…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 10:08 PM
1

The crazy thing is that when you control for age, women attending collage are LESS likely to be raped than their peers.... LESS LIKELY!! While collage women are more likely to be raped than the average women, the fact is that women who are of collage age tend to be more attractive than average and therefore a more likely target. A 22 year old women who does not attend collage is more likely to be raped than one who does. There is no collage rape epidemic.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:02 AM
2

I agree that both feminists and MRAs are after equality. I think a problem with the modern feminist movement is that they feel that everyone is against them, and that any criticism is by default an attack. It's 2015 not 1950, can we please have an actual conversation about equality without one side accusing the other side of hate. This is something that causes a good deal of resentment on the MRA side. We bring up what we see as a valid argument. Such as the problems with child custody. And we p…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:41 PM
69

That's Oppression Olympics talk and yields nothing useful. If you want to engage in a conversation you can't begin on the attack. Rather you need to acknowledge their struggles, they acknowledge ours and then everyone works together to fix shit. If we all stand around discussing who has it worse, nothing ever gets fixed.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 04:11 PM
16

Maybe because taking care of your kids is gasp FUN most times and household chores in the 21st century aren't heavy labor at all. Yes, but that's obviously wrong because that's the work that stay at home moms do and as we all know, that's the hardest job in the world.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:24 PM
1

That's actually kind of a cool way to go about it. I'm as pro man as the next guy, but since most movies are by men about women, it's cool to flip it up.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 02:44 AM
1

Interesting how she blames the company going under on her staff and not her ridiculous hiring attitude. Also, and it might be a quirk of law in the UK. But how is what she did legal? I could not create an "all man" production company, that would not be allowed. I could never write an article about it without being called out for my illegal hiring practices.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 06:37 PM
2

The problem here, and in SO MUCH when talking about this topic. Is that the term "feminism" does not have a definition that is set in stone and easy for everyone to understand. Inevitably any of these discussions devolve into a "no true Scotsman" fallacy, where the person arguing the pro feminist side comes up with the line "those people aren't real feminists" So because there is no such thing as the official feminism society who issues the official feminism doctrine the rules of the /r/feminist…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:52 PM
5

I felt the same in my 20s as you do. Now that I'm 33 I see things through another lense. At around 28 it started happening. I started to notice babies. Now, I'm a dude so I never really thought I would go baby crazy, and in deed I would not say that I went crazy, but there was definably a shift. One day I went from not noticing babies at all, they were just things that some people carried, like purses. But then that changed to noticing them all the time, on the bus, in the store, babies everywhe…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:39 PM
2

I really found myself in disbelief after having been banned. I don't mean to criticize you, but I'm unsure why you were in disbelief. It's right in the rules of /r/feminism that non feminist thoughts are not welcome. Quoted directly from their side bar (the bold is mine) Please observe our rules - all top level comments, in any thread, must: be informative: i.e. aim for facticity, and avoid merely expressing non-feminist preferences; come from an educated perspective: all ideological considerati…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:23 PM
3

You know, this is the third time in 2015 my little Provence has shown up in this sub and it's only been 41 days :(.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:58 PM
2

The police were at his house with a warrant. Get a lawyer no matter what the cost no matter what he can afford.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 11:02 PM
4

What is the goal of this club? The fact is that the MRM has a "bad name" in the harts and minds of most people who identify as feminist. Now, I think it's not deserved. I think that most of those people have never spent any kind of significant time trying to understand what the views of the MRM is. But the fact is that using the MRM name will, in the minds of those people, paint you with the same brush. The people tho do not care to read the truth about what the MRM is are unlikely to even consi…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 10:59 PM
3

Just make sure to never agree to have her stay home with the kids. You assume that's a choice. I personally know of a couple who were both earners and then they had a child. Pre child the assumption was that she would return to work after her maternity benefits ran out (1 year in Canada). After the child was 1 she decided that she did not want to return to work. He disagreed but it's not like he can force her to work if she does not want to. So she stayed home with the kid while he went to work.…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 10:52 PM
10

And that my friends, is what patriarchy is. My former roommate, unsurprisingly, is no longer a feminist." Unsurprisingly!!! That's the only part of the whole post I was actually surprised by.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 10:21 PM
12

This entire subrreddit is Comedy Gold. You're stuck in the 1940s. You know, I don't come into your safe space and troll you. Some people do, I won't deny that. But those people are assholes. What's your excuse? If you'd like a real reply. What part of that comment do you find so funny? That a man dares talk about feminist theory?
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:08 PM
3

Yeah. But I think it's important to note that it's pervasive in the academic culture if the city. Halifax is a wonderful place and I love it, but it's far to "hippy liberal" for its own good some times.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:51 AM
13

suggests Dal Halifax has 2 universities within 2 blocks of each other. This person is a professor at the other school, Saint Mary's University (SMU) and not Dal. I went to SMU.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 05:07 PM
2

Even the fact checking I don't have a HUGE issue with (all though, obviously it was shitty). What I take my main issue with is exactly what we see everywhere we look when it comes to rape. Once the word rape is used it becomes unfathomable to question the accuser. The idea that checking up on what she said would somehow revictimize her is insane. The idea that her story should be published in rolling stone but that she should still retain the right to ask that they not talk to the accused... ins…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:51 AM
3

The only thing that matters is whether anything Jackie claimed to be true is, in fact, true I actually consider that to be the part I don't care about at all. We can never stop people from lying, that's just never going to happen. But we can ensure that the media follow proper journalistic ethics and do all the things that the RS reporter failed to do. The truth of the matter is that there are thousands of lies like this every year. This one became important because a journalist failed to do her…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 11:48 PM
1

So you've come to our safe space to ridicule us? Keep it classy /u/nadrummer98. Just because our moderation rules do not remove this kind of post does not mean we don't remember who comes to this place to troll us.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:04 PM
3

You really need to keep reading. It's a bitching long article and I'll admit I did not finish it. But 2 paragraphs after your last quote begins. Unfortunately, under the worthy mandate of protecting victims of sexual assault, procedures are being put in place at colleges that presume the guilt of the accused. It goes on to speak in support of the Harvard law professors and goes in depth to issues of presumed guilt. The parts you have quoted from are all "the set up" where the author is describin…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:41 AM
1

Additionally, how do you view parodies of the MRM? Watch this (haratige minute from Canada). See how they mock the women, that's how parodies of the MRM feel. https://www.historicacanada.ca/content/heritage-minutes/jennie-trout Like, I understand that some people do not take the issue seriously but to openly mock it shows a shocking level of disrespect and not just disagreement.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:46 PM
1

As much as we rail against false accusations. The statistics tell us that women who are raped are more likely to be raped again than a women who has never been raped. This is likely because of environmental factors or behavior queues that rapists pick up on. However this fact has lead the courts to conclude that a prior history of accusing someone of rape is not relevant when concluding on this rape. In general I would agree with this statement IF we also required actual evidence to convict some…
/r/MensRights17/10/14 04:43 PM
2

Strapped for cash is one thing, but this is your entire life and future we are talking about. Informal hearings are often much more formal than most people think they are. If what you say in an informal hearing can be used in a formal one, than why call it informal? I have no idea if the information can be used, but a lawyer would know. This is the kind of thing where you beg borrow or steal to get the money that you need to fight this properly.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 04:12 PM
1

fathers being protective. I think the reason people call it anti male is that it's expected that the father's roll is to be protective. I personally don't feel it's anti male to show men being traditional type men any more than it's anti women to show a bunch of loving mothers. However, I also don't feel its pro male.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 04:01 PM
13

Also, is it normal for Canadian judges to express concern about the law after having reached their decisions? Sometimes. Judges are bound by what the law actually states. They sometimes might note inconsistencies within the law but they are bound to apply it as it is written. So we sometimes see comments such as these. So men/child support-payers are literally property in Canadian law? Income from property is an official classification of income in the Canadian income tax act. In Canada there ar…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 05:55 PM
2

There's nothing special there about Canada in this respect. The same law exists in most countries. The "problem" is that it's always at the discretion of the crown to prostitute any crime. So while the law states the police CAN investigate and the crown can prosecute, it does not say that they MUST do so.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 03:24 AM
2

First time was fine, a one night stand where nether of us had been drinking. We met online, went to a movie and fucked like rabbits. Second time, I was blackout drunk and she was not (I had to ask her what happened). Third partner, we were making out (naked) and she grabbed it and put it in, without a condom. I had time to get out the words "don't" before it was in. Had sex anyway (because I'm dumb) Fourth partner, was super drunk again. She was also super drunk so I guess I'm also guilty. Fifth…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 06:02 PM
2

It's sickening Yes it is, that's why there's a movement. No, there is not really anything you can do other than help him pay legal costs.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:03 PM
1

You might think, but the western military powers are quite keen to keep the number of dead civilians down, so they have a vested interest in keeping the current system.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:30 AM
1

I don't know if that's the best estimate, but that's the estimation method that is used in most cases. The assumption is that everyone is a combatant, but since women and children "can't" fight they can't be fighters so they get excluded. Among the remaining men, there's no concrete way to say who's a fighter and who's not, and since the presumption is everyone is a fighter unless proven otherwise all of the men are therefore fighters.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:27 PM
2

It does not matter. If she failed to abort there is no recourse available to you. It's not as if you have some way of getting her to do it if she doesn't want to. She said she did it and you are going to have to believe her until the baby arrives (or doesn't). If a baby does arrive, her lying about the abortion will have no effect on the outcome of any proceedings.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:06 PM
1

Right, but that's a totally internal restriction and has nothing to do with government. It's just company (or union) policy that's causing that headache. Most places are fine hiring someone on a 1 year contract.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:08 PM
3

In Canada (where the article is from) employers are not obliged to pay anything extra for mat leave (it's covered under the national Employment Insurance program). However, they may have additional expenses relating to hiring and training a temporary employee to replace those on leave.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 09:53 PM
1

I get it ALL THE TIME. In reality, I simply over explain things to everyone regardless of gender. It's a social issue that I'm trying to correct. It's not that I think women can't figure things out, it's that I don't think anyone can figure things out. I do find it funny at the different ways men and women react. Men tend to stop me mid way, act a little annoyed and be like "dude, I got it". Women tend to let me get all the way through whatever I'm saying, and then get angry with me.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 10:45 PM
3

I don't get the Godwin reference :). I'm not academically educated in gender issues, so that might be why.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:35 PM
8

Worth pointing out that regardless of weather sex econ is right or wrong. Citing that red pillars believe it as evidence of its wrongness is incorrect. Red pillars are wrong about lots of things. But just because they believe in something is not, in and of itself, evidence that the thing in question is incorrect. That's like saying "Hitler believed in X. Hitler is an ass and therefore x must be false."
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:18 PM
4

The thing about the guilt, and the idea of being "nice". At least for me, it was all just a convenient way of dealing with something that I did not want to face. See, I was scared shitless to just make the move, honestly, very little scares me more than just stepping off that ledge. And so, I decide that I don't want to do that because nice guys don't do that and I'm a nice guy. We use the truth that only ass holes would force themselves onto someone else to expand on the definition of what forc…
/r/seduction28/01/14 04:14 PM
5

I think that part of the key is what we do with children. Gender specific behavior expectations for children adopts them into the rules that they are going to be expected to conform to as an adult. When you change those expectations it tips our worldview in a certain way. So I don't think it's fair to say one has it worse or one has it better. I think it's important to see the challenges that both genders face and eliminate the ones we can.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:11 PM
1

You only need to post around 10% of your bail in most cases via a bondsman. But it's then money pissed away that you never get back even if you show up for trial. And even at 10% there's no way I could be able to afford that.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 09:04 PM
3

I've always thought that MR organizations are dwarfed by Feminist organizations when it comes to awareness and fund raising relating to issues that touch our gender. Movember is a charity that supports prostate & testicular cancer as well as mental health programs for men. It's recently come to my attention that many people in the US participate in "No-Shave" November but don't actually participate in Movember. You all do the facial hair side without the fundraising side, so lets stop that.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:34 PM
1

I like your post and agree with the majority of what you said. Except for 2 points. Rehtaeh Parsons and the Frosh week cheers. Both of these are local stories (local to Halifax) that made national news. Rehtaeh lived only a few miles from Dalhousie (the school that published the OP). And one of the schools involved in the frosh cheers is only a few blocks from Dalhousie. Because of their local nature they become relevant to the article. But I agree with everything else. Telling people not to rap…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 10:21 PM
6

I honestly think that the problem lies within the word "drunk". As with laws banning the operation of a vehicle while intoxicated there should be a line that defines at what point a person (not women) is able to consent and at what point they are not. Clearly black out is over the line, clearly passed out is over that line, clearly can't walk or talk in sentences is over that line. Clearly a women who has has only 1 glass of wine is able to consent. 2 glasses, ok. 3? .. 12? well that's likely to…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:57 AM
1

I believe that the real story here is that women are doing a far better job than men at achieving work/life balance. That is the gap we should be focusing on. I'm 100% with you. However I think there's something to be said for the fact that the women's work life balance is often only financially viable because there exists a man who is out of balance. Both men and women have what I call a controlling share of the responsibilities of various aspects of household life. Even in homes who split chil…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:40 AM
1

At my workplace men are required to ware long pants, a button shirt and tie every day. Women are "business smart". The women's description is so vague that as long as they look professional they pass. Let me tell you ties suck in the dead of summer.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 01:49 AM
38

The best argument that the wage gap is false is the fact that there are no companies taking advantage of it. Think of the savings is a company were to hire only women. They would save 20%-20% on salaries and get the same output! Given as this does not happen, you are faced with the question of why. Is it because managers prefer to hire men more than they like money? Even if that were true for some, you would still find at least one firm only willing to hire women. Hell,if even 10% of companies p…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:18 PM
3

Words and language matter. A word does not just mean what we intend it to mean but they also mean what an uninformed listener infers that they mean. So here's my problem. Most reasonable and educated people are able to define patriarchy in some reasonable way. And most of those people do not truly believe that it's a man vs women concept. Many people also believe that feminism fights for equality. This is my problem, language matters. 10 - 15 years ago we, as a society, started to phase out gend…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 08:39 PM
1

I know where you are coming from. But you should also that's a very American idea (I do not mean this in a bad way). In the majority of the rest of the western world, anti-discrimination laws apply to both public and private enterprises. Most of these places believe that my right not to be discriminated against trumps your right to do whatever you want. Whenever rights collide like that a society must make a judgement as to what right is more important. One will win and one will lose. Someone is…
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:24 AM
6

I think what he is saying, is that the system that exists operates the way it does because it has had such one sided lobbying for such a prolonged period of time. The feminism political movement has not taken steps to correct this unfairness that their lobby groups have created. I think this all happens because the system makes the assumption that all child support requested (most are requests from women) are valid, and that if the man complains its because he's a deadbeat. These assumptions exi…
/r/MensRights16/02/13 10:32 PM
1

Thanks! That was just a few examples however. The general theme is that the right thinks the left is week because the left seeks to help the week. The left thinks the right are assholes because the right thinks the week should help themselves. All of the slurs from the left come down to the fact that the left does not understand how a person can be caring and be republican, so labels like recast, misogynist, and homophobe are applied. They just don't understand how someone can think the way you …
/r/MensRights07/02/13 10:46 PM
5

ok... You don't think we should go to war? Your Unamerican or hate the troops. You think everyone should have access to healthcare? your a socialist. Not trying to be a dick. I'm just pointing out that this kind of talk comes from both sides of US politics.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 04:30 PM
1

If you are ever unsure if something is sexsist. Just reverse the genders. "I am a man. I don't want to hire a women because I will be alone with her and am afraid she will accuse me of rape." is that sexual discrimination?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:02 PM
3

OK, I'll give it a crack. One area where I've noticed where MRAs have complete opposite opinions is on the male gender expectations. Some MRAs want to preserve masculinity, and object to the idea that males should have more feminine traits or follow feminine lifestyle choices. Others find the male roles and gender expectations to be oppressive, want liberation from them and stand up for the right to have more feminine traits and follow feminine lifestyle choices. These are two very different opi…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 11:13 PM
9

but your swinging to far to the other side of the argument here. The choice is not between "ware and act however you want" and "asking to be raped". There is a point in the middle where you realise that there are rapists out there, so you take steps to protect yourself. If a women chooses not to take those steps and is raped then it is a situation that might have been avoided if she had changed her actions. The rapist still has 100% of the blame. Just like the mugger is 100% to blame for his act…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 11:47 PM
3

I think you see a lot of that here because some people are so angry. Even the name feminist imply that it is for women. While many feminism say they are for equality they don't seem to actually take action on issues that affect men more than women. Then there is a whole slew of feminists who actively fight the advancement of men. Look at the Men's centre in BC as an example. While most people see the inherent equality of it, many feminists are fighting angst it. It also needs to be pointed out t…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 11:33 PM
1

Parental alienation us one parent turning the children angst the other. DV is domestic violence. By engaging in parental alienation she is abusing you, doing so in front of the children is especially bad. Many laws enacted to prevent abuse say that if it happens in front of the children, then they are also being abused. even if they were not the target of the initial abuse.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 01:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter