MrPancholi Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
17	Men, but not women, living in socio-economically deprived areas are at higher risk for major depressive disorder. But of course that's nothing compared to being crushed and oppressed by the evil patriarchy /s	/r/BlackPillScience	05/12/19 01:26 AM
103	Reproductive success of individuals with schizophrenia, autism, bipolar disorder, depression, anorexia nervosa, and substance abuse. A fertility ratio of 1 represents that of the general population. Why do all these depressed chicks then complain about not being able to get any?	/r/BlackPillScience	28/11/19 01:21 AM
11	"Height does have a strong positive effect on life satisfaction." Height and life satisfaction: Evidence from 27 nations Colour me surprised!	/r/BlackPillScience	10/11/19 05:06 AM
79	Women who perceived themselves as more attractive than their mates more strongly resisted mate guarding and reported less commitment, more flirting with other men, more appealing dating alternatives, and more frequent thoughts about breaking up, reports a survey study (N=692) (Fugère et al, 2015) If they were that forthcoming in a survey, one can only imagine how they really feel.	/r/BlackPillScience	28/05/19 03:22 AM
4	sell me on the blackpill, without using logical fallacies If you have found logical fallacies in any "blackpill" study (all of which are legit, scientifically obtained findings), kindly point them out, and/or email the authors of those studies.	/r/BlackPillScience	27/04/19 07:36 AM
1	[request] screenshots and articles of foids craving bad men Not on this sub, please.	/r/BlackPillScience	21/04/19 01:12 AM
1	Women choose men the same way they choose cars Can you at least link the study?	/r/BlackPillScience	04/04/19 02:25 AM
2	Have you seen Queer Eye? You're just reiterating your flawed argument. So I reiterate - just because you are bad at judging your own attractiveness doesn't mean you can be subjectively perceived as attractive by the opposite sex (or anyone for that matter). And if you're still questioning the importance of facial aesthetics, https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/b8rvjd/facial_dominance_in_homo_sapiens_as_honest/?utm_source=reddit-android	/r/BlackPillScience	03/04/19 01:49 AM
3	Have you seen Queer Eye? Well if that is so then literally none of us are right in judging any relationship, considering literally every relationship is unique, which means every relationship counselor and "dating coach" is wrong (they are pretty much cons, but on their own merits). If no; do you think I could explain it in a way that would allow you to actually feel it? You don't actually need to feel something to understand it. The therapist doesn't need to be depressed or have gone through depression to make their pa…	/r/BlackPillScience	02/04/19 01:58 AM
3	Have you seen Queer Eye? So, men are bad at judging their own attractiveness (which is why you'll occasionally see a fool trying to flirt above his league). Does that undermine how facial aesthetics are weighed into attractiveness? No. You're probably thinking "Attractiveness is subjective" as you mentioned in your comment, but it's not. Allow me to prove that using the study you cited. This study examined sex differences in men's and women's accuracy at assessing their own attractiveness, using subjects' self-ratings a…	/r/BlackPillScience	01/04/19 06:56 PM
4	Have you seen Queer Eye? Any research paper from a somewhat reputable university/institution that shows that personal grooming is a bigger factor in mate selection or overall sexual attractiveness than genetically determined traits such as facial aesthetics, height, etc.	/r/BlackPillScience	01/04/19 12:18 PM
6	Have you seen Queer Eye? One doesn't have to have been in a relationship to understand them. Jane Goodall studied apes and developed a solid understanding of them by simply observing them. She didn't have to throw her poop at anyone. Also, it is fallacious to assume you have a good understanding of relationships because you've been in a few (call to authority). You may as well not understand relationships as well as some of us do. Edit: by asking people if they've ever had sex/been in a relationship, you're accomplishin…	/r/BlackPillScience	01/04/19 03:15 AM
3	Have you seen Queer Eye? Dodging the question, are we? Anyway, about your "solution" bit, it was answered fairly well by another user so I'll just quote: Not all of us who've taken the"blackpill" see these things as a "problem." Some of us just recognize human nature. ... For males who are not top 20% in charm, size, financial success and/or facial aesthetics, all highly related to genetics, it is important to recognize that the game just isn't worth playing. (Disclaimer: I don't agree with some of the political opinion…	/r/BlackPillScience	01/04/19 03:07 AM
7	Have you seen Queer Eye? C'mon dude... On this sub, that's just mean.	/r/BlackPillScience	01/04/19 02:37 AM
7	Have you seen Queer Eye? If you could present some non-anecdotal evidence, please do. For me it's about the pursuit of verifiable truth regardless of how "black-pilled" it is.	/r/BlackPillScience	31/03/19 04:04 PM
11	Men have Lower Standards Umm..... Where's the science?	/r/BlackPillScience	31/03/19 02:01 AM
7	Sex Frequency for 18 - 29 year olds Median figures would have been more revealing.	/r/BlackPillScience	31/03/19 01:59 AM
1	Physical Attractiveness Truth Why was self-reporting ever considered as a reliable assessment, especially in a matter such as this, in which people are known to be duplicitous?	/r/BlackPillScience	28/03/19 02:00 AM
6	The reason why many of the studies posted on here are largely BS . != means "not equal to" (sorry, programmer's habit) As for the woman with 83 partners: Romantically successful? Maybe, maybe not. Sexually successful? You betcha	/r/BlackPillScience	18/03/19 06:05 PM
10	The reason why many of the studies posted on here are largely BS . Romantic success != Sexual success. Number of sexual partners is generally a good indicator of sexual success, much like number of goals scored is generally, but not always, a good indicator of a striker's skill.	/r/BlackPillScience	18/03/19 05:25 PM
12	Something I’ve noticed Valid observation but NOT SCIENCE.	/r/BlackPillScience	03/03/19 08:55 AM
3	People who believe in a just world are more likely to commit dishonest behaviour, study finds. Belief in just world, aa mentioned in the study (just read it before asking, will ya?) I know what you dirty minds are thinking though :)	/r/BlackPillScience	11/02/19 02:40 AM
5	People who believe in a just world are more likely to commit dishonest behaviour, study finds. Can someone explain the difference between personal bjw and general bjw mentioned in the study?	/r/BlackPillScience	11/02/19 01:25 AM
4	What a nice woman. NOT SCIENCE	/r/BlackPillScience	11/02/19 01:05 AM
7	Study shows divorces rates rise when people have more potential mates to choose from I wonder why people have so much trouble understanding such obvious things that a studies must be conducted to prove them.	/r/BlackPillScience	09/01/19 01:40 PM
8	Tinder Experiments II: Guys, unless you are really hot you are probably better off not wasting your… You hear that, bottom 70 percentile guys? You're using it wrong. It's totally your fault.	/r/BlackPillScience	28/12/18 04:29 AM
36	Study Finds Women Are More Attracted To Men Who Are Taken "One day, a woman will love you for who you are... Provided that her friends and your current girlfriend like your face (did I mention you need to have a gf?)"	/r/BlackPillScience	27/12/18 03:12 AM