TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MraBob Archive

View 78 posts and 711 comments by MraBob on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3084

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:39 PM
1917

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:12 AM
735

Fathers/CustodyMraBob/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:56 PM
479

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights21/05/17 09:17 PM
344

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:44 PM
340

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights09/04/17 08:33 AM
321

DiscriminationMraBob/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:39 PM
269

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:21 AM
241

False AccusationMraBob/r/MensRights02/06/17 10:30 AM
169

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:19 AM
164

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights10/03/17 07:10 PM
153

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:16 AM
138

DiscriminationMraBob/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:39 AM
107

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights28/02/17 08:10 PM
104

FeminismMraBob/r/MensRights20/04/17 10:23 AM
103

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights20/05/17 11:03 AM
99

Activism/SupportMraBob/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:52 AM
96

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:28 AM
91

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights06/07/17 02:43 AM
83

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:04 AM
80

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights06/04/17 08:45 PM
73

DiscriminationMraBob/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:22 AM
68

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights17/07/17 09:53 PM
68

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:05 PM
66

Anti-MRMMraBob/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:20 AM
66

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights01/08/17 11:19 PM
65

False AccusationMraBob/r/MensRights14/06/17 10:50 AM
64

Fathers/CustodyMraBob/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:18 PM
63

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:46 AM
62

Fathers/CustodyMraBob/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:55 PM
62

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights19/09/17 10:26 PM
59

Fathers/CustodyMraBob/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:53 AM
59

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights29/04/17 05:29 AM
59

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:22 PM
55

DiscriminationMraBob/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:57 PM
55

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:49 PM
54

DiscriminationMraBob/r/MensRights18/05/17 08:33 PM
52

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:40 AM
51

Fathers/CustodyMraBob/r/MensRights30/04/17 10:53 AM
50

GeneralMraBob/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:10 AM
46

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:56 AM
46

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights13/05/17 11:13 PM
45

False AccusationMraBob/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:48 PM
45

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights15/08/17 09:06 AM
44

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:48 PM
42

False AccusationMraBob/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:17 PM
36

DiscriminationMraBob/r/MensRights28/03/17 05:18 PM
36

FeminismMraBob/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:32 AM
34

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:09 PM
30

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:09 AM
27

DiscriminationMraBob/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:01 AM
26

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:53 PM
26

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:50 PM
26

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights24/03/17 07:07 PM
23

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights13/05/17 08:50 PM
22

GeneralMraBob/r/MensRights03/05/17 07:17 AM
22

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights25/09/17 08:32 PM
22

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:04 AM
20

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights23/04/17 09:12 AM
18

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:31 PM
18

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:24 PM
15

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:08 AM
13

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights25/02/17 10:45 PM
13

False AccusationMraBob/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:12 AM
12

HumourMraBob/r/MensRights13/07/17 08:31 PM
12

DiscriminationMraBob/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:01 AM
10

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights20/04/17 11:51 PM
10

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:20 AM
7

Marriage/DivorceMraBob/r/MensRights12/04/17 10:23 PM
5

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights11/04/17 09:06 AM
5

Fathers/CustodyMraBob/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:07 PM
4

Legal RightsMraBob/r/MensRights15/07/17 11:18 PM
1

Edu./Occu.MraBob/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:58 PM
1

UnconfirmedMraBob/r/MensRights08/03/17 02:20 AM
0

GeneralMraBob/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:03 AM
0

Social IssuesMraBob/r/MensRights30/04/17 08:04 AM
0

Marriage/DivorceMraBob/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:21 PM
0

GeneralMraBob/r/MensRights24/04/17 08:29 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well that's your theory. My theory is there are upvote brigades that try and damage this sub by getting shitposts on the front page. I have seen this time and time again. The very best genuine stories might max out at around 1400, while some fucking deadbeat meme gets 20,000. And then the mods say "oh this is against the rules but now it's there we have to leave it". Shit brains.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 12:22 PM
1

Sounds like we need to make some costumes and send them to CBC...
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:04 AM
1

But that is not how this legal system works. It's not how blood sucking women work either.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:00 AM
1

Because conventional weapons and wars don't pose much danger? WW1 - 41million dead WW2 - 80 million dead (only stopped cuz nukes) Nuke deaths - 250,000 World wars since nukes: 0 In reality if nukes killed anyone, it was because they stopped invasions of China and Russia that could have prevented Mao and Stalin caused famines. Sometimes an invasions can save lives.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:56 AM
1

Waspi women (Women Against State Pension Inequality) Can't make this shit up.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:02 AM
1

What a stupid whore. Al-Hijrah school in Birmingham was told that its segregation policy on religious grounds was illegal sex discrimination. What was the discrimination? Where they offering cunts less education than boys?
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:30 PM
1

America isn't Australia cunt.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 11:06 PM
1

Listen to this cunt.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 07:45 PM
1

In "normal" cases where the jury evaluated evidence to determine guilty beyond reasonable doubt, yet. In rape cases however, the jury acts as truth seers who don't evaluate evidence but instead make a determination about who is telling the truth. Thus an acquittal is the same as a finding of guilt of a false accusation.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 07:32 PM
20

The family court isn't just "biased" towards women. The whole system was set up on the basis that marriage was like a Nazi concentration camp for women and that the family courts are there to free them from their husbands, and give women justice for "1000s of oppression". When a ex husband and wife walk into a family court room that is how the judge sees them - a victim and a monster of patriarchy. And some men still feel surprised when they are basically raped by the court and tossed out onto t…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:38 PM
3

You mean feminists?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:31 PM
13

movement criticizing the push for gender equality in the technology industry. Actually they do want gender equality. Like women dealing with workplace issues like men and not running off to HR every time a man breathes too loudly.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:30 PM
5

Just your Daily Failed Rape Persecution from the UK.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 07:40 PM
3

If women suffered a tiny fraction of what men suffer in the family courts the whole operation would be shut down.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:24 PM
3

Do we need a different name for concern trolls? Probably, because some don't get the message.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:22 PM
4

Get your degree and get the fuck out. It's like running the gauntlet.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:19 PM
1

It would not surprise me if she puts a lot of pressure on the police officers under her authority to pursue any and all accusations against men of any form of sexual impropriety regardless of the strength of the case. I would be surprised if it wasn't the case. I think this explains a lot, thanks.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:17 AM
1

Yep all true. would the young woman who made the accusation be held accountable Well this one wasn't, so I guess no. What's up with the women there?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:00 AM
6

Of course they are. And the letter has been recalled hasn't it?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 06:19 AM
2

Exactly.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:50 AM
1

What you can do today is go MGTOW.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:32 AM
3

If you ever read "Law Reform Commission" in Australia understand it is an organization of feminists trying to make laws for women. At a federal and state level. I can’t see anything That's the problem, nothing about fathers rights, access rights, child support reform.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:30 AM
3

As if the system wasn't biased against fathers enough already.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:43 PM
5

And every single Facebook photo by the looks.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:28 AM
7

No, waking up the next morning with a hangover isn't rape dear. That's why you thought it was funny.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:02 AM
1

So definitely not (B) I hear?
/r/MensRights26/09/17 10:09 PM
1

You would affect all cases the law applies to, not specific standards. Many legal systems already have crime specific evidence standards.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 10:05 PM
1

I wasn't talking about a specific case, but the law regarding crimes and the standards of evidence applied to them.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:55 PM
1

Are you saying there is no such thing as standards of evidence?
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:42 PM
3

Actually, the UK actually does prosecute women for perverting the course of justice, and jails them. Australia only ever charges them with making a false report, and almost never jails them, if ever.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 07:43 PM
7

Only there has been a long string of similar cases that end the same way.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:30 PM
6

Also since 2015: http://www.bordermail.com.au/story/3915607/teens-lies-tie-up-cops-resource/?cs=53 http://www.bordermail.com.au/story/3050687/breaking-albury-assault-allegation-revealed-as-false/?cs=53 "The myth of false accusations"
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:20 PM
1

Name any successful female coders. Anyone. And no Cobol isn't a good example.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:41 AM
1

Sad thing of it wasn't for the internet, he would be what people know as a "mens rights activist". Thanks to the internet he is a nobody.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:04 AM
5

Watch the lawsuits roll...
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:57 AM
21

Until the inevitable acquittal.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:54 AM
3

Well said!
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:50 AM
14

Surprising absolutely nobody at all.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:00 AM
2

So just to be clear, does this hypothetical good male driver pay the same or more than a woman for car insurance?
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:33 AM
1

The reason there is a gap is because all other things are not equal. You're saying there are no men in Britain driving cheap cars and who have clean driving records? Not even one?
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:12 AM
8

So your saying a man with a cheap car who has been in no accidents will pay exactly the same as a woman? Doesn't sound that way to me.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:53 PM
1

Any basic competence test will do.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:38 PM
29

It’s not the fault of UMSL’s Title IX office for his shadowy investigation, but rather the Obama administration, which has threatened free speech, fair legal proceedings and “just plain common sense” in academia, according to Rochester. Yet the Gestapo and SS didn't get away with murdering Jews just because Hitler ordered them to. What gives?
/r/MensRights25/09/17 08:21 PM
16

men are still paying more - because insurers' data continues to rate the majority of male drivers as a riskier proposition. So they can still take gender into account during modeling? What bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:38 PM
13

you suffer from an emotionally-unstable personality disorder Funny how only women can suffer from this disorder. Men are just criminals.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:35 PM
1

Yeah I guess when I look at it that way...
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:10 PM
1

infrastructure corporate give away. Yeah well go complain in r/socialism, it's not exactly a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:58 PM
5

I still don't recall Sanders condemning kangaroo campus courts, whatever label you want to stick on him. Trump and De Vos got the job done.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:37 PM
6

So the left is opposed to feminism now? Shit gets crazier every day.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:27 PM
8

Yeah, kangaroo campus rape courts were just the best! Let's bring them back right away!
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:49 AM
1

Only when it comes to sentencing cunts for raping or abusing children. You should see them when the cunt stole money from her workplace or defrauded the welfare office!
/r/PussyPass25/09/17 10:18 AM
1

Yes yes and yes. Except they are not doormats, they are all ideological feminists.
/r/PussyPass25/09/17 10:02 AM
14

Up cunt?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/17 09:58 AM
1

Every judge in Australia is the same.
/r/PussyPass25/09/17 09:50 AM
9

"I think society recognizes that men and women deal with sex and sexuality much differently, both as adults and as children. I think the court will be able to discern that difference in passing sentence." You mean how girls mature earlier than boys?
/r/PussyPass25/09/17 09:49 AM
1

She's a famous child beating cunt now.
/r/PussyPass25/09/17 09:47 AM
2

Let's be liberal and vote Labour/Dems everybody!
/r/MensRights25/09/17 09:14 AM
2

Well I guess there are lots of successful software projects written by a bunch of disgusting whores, so I guess the Node folk should just give up. Oh wait, I was thinking about Cobol, my bad. Keep it up Node folk!
/r/MensRights25/09/17 09:08 AM
1

Just listen to this cunt.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:48 AM
1

Nah if they want the right to kill children, it's fitting they kill their daughters. Fairs fair.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:31 PM
5

"Why did you have to be born? Why do you have to make my life so miserable?" Wait was it depression or did she just want to get rid of a burden she didn't want?
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:29 PM
9

Yes, and I can imagine him being laughed out of court. Why these women aren't just charged with murder and then forced to justify a plea of insanity amazes me... Wait no it doesn't. Because the government keeps a law that basically allows them to kill their "babies" - is a 2 year old still a baby?
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:26 PM
1

infanticide Well if Australia ia going to have laws that allow women to kill children, I'm glad it was a little girl. Let other cunts suffer misandry not men and boys.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:15 PM
9

If they go out of business I'll buy the cake.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:41 AM
5

Thanks to De Vos this cunt's kangaroo court license has been revoked.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:51 AM
5

has an opportunity to have a felony conviction dismissed for sexually assaulting a 13-year-old boy More than avoiding jail. Defense attorney Scott Lewis said his client took the plea deal even though “she has always maintained her innocence. ... It’s essentially an acquittal without the risk of a trial.” And she gets that deal even without admitting anything. Talk about female privilege!
/r/MensRights23/09/17 08:59 PM
1

DeVos said, “Acts of sexual misconduct are reprehensible, disgusting, and unacceptable. They are acts of cowardice and personal weakness, often thinly disguised as strength and power.” Did she also condemn false accusations? Pity if not.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 08:11 PM
12

They need to stop pretending that this was an error. This is just what police do - when an allegation is made, they will work with an accuser to frame the accused man, and then put them in front of a evidence free show trial in which it is basic illegal to conduct a defence. There needs to be a national royal commission not a police inquiry.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 08:07 PM
2

In Australia we don't have the equivalent of title IX We have a "human rights" commission instead.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 11:33 AM
1

Feminist Logic 101.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 03:22 AM
42

Why the hell do colleges have this at all? It's where feminists try social engineering experiments before trying to roll it out nationwide. It goes way back to the 60s.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 02:23 AM
-7

Man better get rid of Trump and vote the Dems back in!
/r/MensRights23/09/17 01:33 AM
4

There's a chrome extension that screenshots a page, they can't do shit about that.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 08:12 PM
2

Wtf didn't this happen already in the UK? And these cunts only get 20 years for torturing and killing a kid?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:56 AM
3

What's the basis to hold a presumed innocent person in custody before their "speedy trial"? Sounds more like a presumption of guilt to me.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:44 AM
1

Feminists vs BlackLivesMatter the Battle Royal!
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:25 AM
-2

Why would liberals be this sub? Great question!
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:25 AM
-10

I bet you say that all the time.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 12:13 AM
-13

Believe it or not there is already a mens rights sub for libtards, its called mens lib appropriately enough. Maybe you should go there. Or go read about mens rights in your favorite liberal publication...NYT, WaPo, rolling stone, salon, huffpo, buzzfeed...oh wait they all hate mens rights and will go bezerk when DeVos rolls back campus kangaroo courts. If being partisan means not being blind to the side of politics attacking mens rights...then partisan I am.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 11:40 PM
32

But if women lie about rape how can we put men on trial without evidence?
/r/MensRights19/09/17 08:56 PM
3

Funny they can't find a man in the same situation to make the point.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 08:31 PM
5

Maybe they should take their money to the nearest strip club and celebrate patriarchy instead.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 11:28 AM
3

“Your malicious complaint has done a huge disservice to those seeking justice through the police and courts.” But I thought juries made decisions based on the evidence not on the belief women never lie about rape?
/r/MensRights19/09/17 12:40 AM
0

Good news story :D
/r/MensRights18/09/17 07:21 PM
3

the strategy is an effort to maintain the confidence and trust of the public. Translation: we are succumbing to feminazis in the media. Nothing like a witchhunt and evidence free investigations and show trials to gain the confidence of the public.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:44 AM
0

Probably a mod on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:12 PM
1

Feminism must be great for women.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:11 PM
1

This retrial talk is retarded. Sentences can be appealed, it is not a retrial, no double jeapordy.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 05:03 AM
6

Fucking disgusting. Basically no mention of the man at all. And basically not reported at a national level. She was “highly intoxicated” on the night the offence was said to have taken place, and has been suffering depression and anxiety. Yet she made the fake claim the next day, so she wasn't drunk when she committed the actual crime. All you do is provide ammunition for people who say these things don’t happen, Actually we say they do happen, false allegations that is. The only people claiming…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 04:56 AM
1

Hopefully the cunt hooks up with a nice crack head that gives it back to her with a baseball bat.
/r/PussyPass14/09/17 12:15 PM
0

Fuck off concern troll.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 01:28 PM
-1

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 01:23 PM
-8

Liberal fucktard can't even explain his own comment and throws strawmans like a little bitch - classic.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 01:17 PM
-5

Does this cuck mod post this everywhere now? Just when you thought this sub couldn't get any more pathetic.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 12:58 PM
1

Well if she dodges jail hopefully 1000 men accused of rape dodge jail too, because you know now juries know cunts lie about rape at the drop of a hat and all.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 12:55 PM
-6

What the fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights11/09/17 12:46 PM
43

This sub is heavily affected by "upvote brigades" and fuckwits like DougDante.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 12:42 PM
-8

Men's Rights isn't a conservative/liberal issue! /s Fucktards walk yourself out. Edit: can't believe I had to add /s to the above. What happened to this sub?
/r/MensRights11/09/17 08:54 AM
5

r/DailyFemaleTeacherRapeStories
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:11 PM
3

Most ABC presenters are women and for a while their entire political reporting team was women (may still be case). Its well known in Australia.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:08 PM
1

Easier to just not have kids. Ever.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:54 PM
1

Very few do.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:53 AM
36

Sick. I'm sure she'll get a tough slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 11:03 AM
19

I bet it can be used as evidence if it supports her accusations.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:06 PM
10

because it does appear very difficult to get a conviction. Isn't that how it should be in a case based on no evidence? Should it be easy to convict anyone of a crime without evidence? I have an idea for an even easier way to "get" convictions....just do away with trials altogether.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:06 PM
7

Fuck Google. Pit of misandry.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:59 PM
5

This is why feminists want campus kangaroo courts: real trials will look at the actual evidence and expose false accusers for what they are.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 08:15 PM
1

It's amazing she went to jail at all.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 08:13 PM
0

So in your magical world an average school trip would be a big orgy of teachers fucking the brains out of their 16 year old students? Ped. O. Phile.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 10:37 AM
0

--> r/pedophiles
/r/MensRights04/08/17 08:12 PM
1

In the UK it's 16. Not when the child is under care, then it is 18. So take your pedophile shit elsewhere.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 08:11 PM
3

MGTOW protects men today.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:34 AM
1

No, she was sentenced to only half that as the sentence was suspended.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 11:17 PM
1

You don't have a trial when someone pleads guilty fuckwit.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 11:16 PM
3

Why isn't the cunt being named? The is no law in the US giving these whores anonymity.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 12:54 PM
5

Nothing like having to prove your own innocence in a court of law. Soon they will be gassing Jews or something.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 09:48 AM
3

That's being used as propaganda by the MSM to drive the creation of kangaroo show trials for male students. We can't ignore it, despite how rotten to the core it is.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 07:40 AM
1

Around 9.50 as measured using the podcast app I listen with.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 04:07 AM
1

I am 100% sure this has nothing to do with actual problems on campus, it is a fraud intended to justify the trialling of feminist courts that they will then attempt to roll out more widely. Feminists have always treated university campuses as zones for social experimentation and this just part of that.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:00 AM
6

AND on top of that 80% of so called victims didn't even think what happened to them was serious enough to report. 80%. So that leave about 0.3% who claims to experience something more serious. Which probably accounts for every gender studies student making false statements to the survey in order to fuel the propaganda.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:08 AM
4

It found that the male student accused the female student of sexual assault as “a tactical maneuver and in bad faith.” Belieeeeeve the female victim!
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:37 PM
2

“Why would highly educated, confident and privileged young women be less inclined to report sexual assault than women elsewhere? It doesn’t make sense.” Maybe because in real courts having regrets months later isn't evidence of a crime. They want to make up their own courts with invented crimes. The resulting system of kangaroo courts is outrageously tilted in the accuser’s favour with a far lower standard of proof than in the criminal system This is a myth on both fronts. In reality, neither sy…
/r/MensRights30/07/17 06:16 PM
20

It didn't cut rapes by 50%, it cut regretful sex and the false accusations that follow by 50%.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 05:58 PM
3

Mangina gets burnt by the system he helped create....stays a mangina. Suppose you need to give him creds for sticking with it. Personally MGTOW is working out really well for me.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 07:45 PM
-5

Fuck off concern troll.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:33 PM
8

They don't have that right already. No proof of anything is needed to convict a man of rape.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:31 PM
42

Who would have thought BuzzFeed would be making false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:25 PM
5

The rape propaganda in Australia never stops.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:22 PM
2

Because friend zoning is about women exerting power over men (just wanting to be friends, but demanding he not see other girls), which is what feminists want.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:09 PM
14

145 reports / 5 years / 43 unis = 0.67 reports/uni/year. There are 1.3 million university students in Australia.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:28 AM
9

It seems that there is a thing going through the liberal media at the moment where they realize a generation of womens will never be able to breed or get "married" (i.e.divorce rape a man). Maybe MGTOW is having a bigger impact than we had hoped?
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:31 AM
6

There is only one way to be safe and that is to MGTOW.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 08:45 PM
2

It's a disgrace. But what I find funny is feminists are celebrating that a feminist organization like the BBC did what you would expect a feminist organization to do and destroy a great male icon. If that is where they set the bar on victory it seems very low.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:01 AM
7

Well surely all these lefty liberals working for the BBC will be glad to donate half their salary to their female colleagues won't they?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 08:58 AM
14

Blonde former air hostess Lowe, When is the media most likely to describe a woman as a blonder or brunette, reducing her to her hair color? When she has been accused of raping a boy. She was refused bail Well that's some progress right there.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 08:53 AM
1

If you really want to know, a lot of reasons: general awareness of men's issues and and the manosphere wanting to avoid ever coming into contact with the family court/child support systems (I earn quite a lot and I calculated how much I would have to pay for a single child once and my jaw dropped) I actually enjoy being single, and don't particular yearn for family/community life (I hate nothing more than a bunch of people I barely know or like coming to my house for a BBQ) I love travel, and li…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:32 AM
1

Late 20s and it's not a movement to join LOL, it's a personal pathway to choose, although lots of migtows share their life experiences with each other.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:57 AM
1

No, I live in Australia where there are multiple cheap, legal (or otherwise) ways to find girls who want to do the deal. You should come and check it out!
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:50 AM
1

wink
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:43 AM
2

I've been MGTOW and I have lots of sex. The things desperate overseas students will do for a few bucks....I'm not complaining.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:48 AM
1

MGTOWs dont get married or have relationships with women of any kind -- incels can't get laid.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:41 AM
6

Better than sucking on the teets of the government.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:32 PM
8

Imagine how many more homeless people there would be if corporations didn't employ so many people.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:20 PM
11

And how do freeloaders fit into that model?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 09:07 PM
1

Conservative are not great on men's rights, but they tend to be a lot better than 100% pro-feminist liberals. And donate to yourself. Mens rights is about personal action, going MGTOW, and the greatest gift you can give other men is advice and information on how to do the same. The misandry in the media, government and law is not going to be overturned anytime soon.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:54 PM
3

Maybe womens should stop marrying men and marry the government instead - he's cashed up baby!
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:13 PM
9

And women overall already cost the government more in welfare than it get's back in tax dollars. They are a terrible drain on society.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:11 PM
2

This is where the false claim from the family court system - that men would not be able to achieve career success without a woman tending to home comes from. If she didn't do a good job caring for the home he would not be a house husband, but rather a bachelor enjoying even more career success. It's for reasons like this you should avoid marriage and go MGTOW.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 07:16 PM
1

The right to not be discriminated against due to your gender.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:48 AM
1

Well then fuck off and we will both be happy.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 10:57 PM
2

So why don't you fuck of to Mens Lib and get a handjob from some of your mangina pals then? Seriously, the number of people who come here and complain when they so clearly belong on Mens Lib or 2X is staggering. Don't complain, just go, go somewhere else where you will be happy.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:21 PM
1

That question is, frankly, silly. Why? Surely you must have one. Is it BuzzFeed or Salon? Did you shed some tears when Gawker was hulked to death? All great publications loved by MRAs the world over. Really? Your 5 month old account doesn't indicate to me that you've been an MRA longer than, frex, TyphonBlue. I go by many aliases and have been here in one form or another since before this sub was even known outside of the manosphere or any of the current mods were active from what I can gather. …
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:19 PM
17

It prompted a wave of complaints for showing a bikini-clad model in an advertisement for a slimming product, which critics said was socially irresponsible. When did obesity become the new standard of health?
/r/MensRights18/07/17 11:09 AM
2

You do realize what the ad hominem fallacy is right? You realize that clutching at straws doesn't make you any less wrong, right? The same argument is made for the top 100 conservative sites. Hell some of them STILL make the claim Obama is planning a secret coup to retake the US government and name himself dictator What argument is that? That all conservative news outlets are feminist? You seem to be getting muddled. the ever increasing belief being instilled that Group A and Group B are differe…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 11:07 AM
2

I'm definitely a liberal So what are your favorite liberal websites? Just asking. Really? Who the fuck made YOU the gatekeeper for this sub? You're not a mod. Fuck the mods. The are all admin stooges anyway and I have been here way longer than all of them combined.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 10:21 AM
1

Once again, ad hominem, cognitive dissonance is strong with you it appears. Feminists complaining about cognitive dissonance sounds like the start of a priceless MasterCard joke... using facts and statistics to make actual positive change happen? Why don't you go and look at the top 100 liberal websites and see how many of them are feminist? That will keep your little beaver brain busy for a while, but is 100 too big a number for you to handle? Because you will encounter it twice. I am either mi…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:57 AM
0

So if all liberals are feminists, then all men are rapists? Twisted logic, right from a feminists cunt. If you are really trying to deny the overwhelming connection between liberals and feminists...then I don't really know what to tell you. Apart from the fact you are a disingenuous liar...but we already knew you were a feminist liberal so that would be redundant. I'm very curious how liberal means feminist. I missed that particular lesson when learning about progressive ideology and conservativ…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:36 AM
-1

Read the news fucktard.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:32 AM
-3

Fuck off. We aren't going to change out position to pander to a bunch of liberal cucks. Liberal feminist mangina men are fucking worse that average female feminists and if they don't come here that is a GOOD THING. No where in my post do I remotely come close to suggesting feminism is good for men But liberal=feminist so it's basically the same thing and you know it, no strawman there. It's almost as if extreme MRAs and extreme feminists are the same, as strawmen are the feminazis first step in …
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:22 AM
6

However I do care about healthcare reform, public infrastructure, alternative energy, and climate change. The problem, idiot, is none of that has anything to do with men's rights. Depriving men of due process rights on campus does, and guess what? It is a liberal clusterfuck being undone by Trump. None everything conservatives do is good for men, but if you think feminism better for men you should really pay a visit to Mens Lib and stay there.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:07 AM
9

If it is a woman, that is correct about 90% of the time. They also almost always avoid jail as well and the judgements are usually covered up to prevent the public from understanding why.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:31 AM
7

You guess well.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:21 AM
8

Just the Australian legal system.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 01:23 AM
18

Then in January last year the teacher invited the student to her home for lunch, where he drank three beers before she began kissing him on the sofa Romantic romp. Then in January last year the teacher invited the student to his home for lunch, where she drank three beers before he began kissing her on the sofa Plying a child with alcohol.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 11:18 PM
14

It's nice that the Daily Telegraph has the back of a child rapist. Note how they barely mention the victim at all.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:57 PM
33

Rape culture made them done it!
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:00 AM
0

I already don't watch it since Tennant left. It is crap and about to get a whole lot crapper.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 07:48 AM
5

Aren't the Turks the biggest pack of rapists and women abusers on the planet?
/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:32 AM
0

It's relevant to my choice to watch it or not.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:30 AM
29

This has got to be one of the most despicable, disgusting things to come out of the UK family court. Mr Kerslake, who walks with crutches after hurting his back in a fall, was raising their four children. Their 19-year marriage ended six years ago and Mr Kerslake has become estranged from his children So he was the stay at home dad yet still loses everything. Seriously, marriage is insanity.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:04 AM
0

As part of the current bullshit PC series. None of it's canon to me, that ended with Tennant.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 02:46 AM
1

I said everything after Tennant was shit, not before. I also liked Eccleston.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 09:51 PM
2

Of course they do.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 08:55 PM
2

Why shouldn't there be a woman Doctor? Because the doctor is a man. He changes bodies not minds.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 08:51 PM
5

Show went to shit after David Tennent and bringing in a token woman won't save it.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 08:48 PM
8

Women who cry rape and survivors of false accusations.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 08:43 PM
3

Here in Australia they almost always avoid jail altogether.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 12:56 PM
2

The question is whether that possibility should strip actual rape victims of their rights to be protected by their colleges and to have their abusers removed from school so that they can’t hurt anyone else, and so survivors don’t have to see their attackers walking the halls every day. Well if we didn't give a shit about innocent people being convicted of any crime, why have trials at all? Oh wait, we don't.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 09:47 AM
1

Women may be loving their curves more now than they have over the last 50 years, but apparently men don't quite feel the same. Front page of every womans mag: anorexic modes. Front page of every lads mag: girls with curves and booty in all the right spots. Yeeessss.....blame the Jews, its the evil Jews fault.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 08:17 AM
11

Yet in another case when a teacher raped a 16 year old boy it was an "affair" and the word "abuse" mentioned exactly 0 times http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3599297/Married-geography-teacher-27-sex-16-year-old-pupil-car-six-month-affair-started-propositioned-giving-lift-home.html.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:45 AM
2

Here was the original link/title http://pasteupload.com/image/DTGI
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:34 AM
1

I think it's more like 10% go to court.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 11:56 PM
8

In conclusion he wrote that the 'competing user-oath allegations and denials' do not constitute documented evidence. This is so heartening to read.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:43 PM
0

Get this feminist bullshit out of here.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:18 PM
3

“I don’t find that you're the kind of person that needs to be warehoused for years,” Here, have a pussy-pass instead.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:27 AM
1

A self explanatory shitpost is still a shitpost.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:15 AM
3

It often takes days, week, months or even years for a survivor to realize what happened to them was non-consensual and a criminal act Srsly.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:18 AM
2

The DOE also invited feminist groups to the meeting, but swiftly disinvited the anti-rape group Know Your IX Well that's awesome!
/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:43 AM
4

What a convenient get-out-of-jail-free card.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:38 AM
1

Support Trump and De Vos?
/r/MensRights14/07/17 10:46 PM
1

Lack of consent may be inferred based on all of the surrounding circumstances Like if she regrets it the next morning. Basically unless you get a signed, witnessed statement saying a woman consented, you basically don't know if you could be charged with rape under this law. In order to account for lack of consent, Senate Bill 29 proposes a definition of consent as 'words or overt actions Is "opening her legs" considered a overt action? The new law accounts for the fact...that coercing someone wh…
/r/MensRights14/07/17 10:40 PM
3

And again the shittiest posts get upvoted the most, and the mods do nothing. Have you ever wondered why the best quality posts here often get just a few hundred upvotes, yet shitposts get 5000+? This sub is obviously being brigaded, and the fucking mods let it happen. They are probably part of a conspiracy with the admins to turn this sub into shit, and when you look at the stuff they do ban, it easy to see why.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 10:24 PM
2

They should make a movie called Escape from London with Kurt Russell in it.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 01:22 PM
1

Nice!
/r/MensRights14/07/17 01:13 PM
8

He'll either be the worlds biggest mangina or MRA. No in between.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 09:53 PM
1

No you wont. And long titles break no rules on reddit or this sub.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:58 PM
0

the fucking delete these shitposts!
/r/MensRights12/07/17 08:22 PM
0

And the shittiest posts get upvoted the most...fuck the mods here are stupid.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 08:21 PM
15

Yet shitposts with images of twitter/facebook/chat app messages are allowed. Go figure.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 09:13 PM
2

The politically correct policy How is it politically correct? Just call misandry by it's name.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:16 PM
2

Doesn't sound painful enough.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 10:04 AM
2

The cunt feeds on attention - stop giving it to her.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:28 PM
2

Did the Guardian even publish it at all? They would usually be all over a black man being jailed on no evidence.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:27 PM
2

The cuck judge is already referring to her "attention seeking behavior". Pussy pass in the works. It's never safe to just belieeeve the victim. And how many other innocent men are in jail now? And will anything change in the law that allows men to be convicted without evidence?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 05:44 AM
64

We can point out double standards in the media without lowering ourselves to those standards.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:15 AM
19

This is a scandalous reversal of the traditional understanding that the burden of proof of guilt lies upon the Crown This woman has a poor understanding of the law. If the burden of proof was with the prosecution, the accused should not have to reach for any evidence at all, and in the absence of independent evidence, there would be no trial at all and an automatic acquittal. The point is the burden of proof has already been reversed. This is just limiting the ability of men to defend themselves…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:47 PM
9

Add in divorce and the family court and that's a bad stew I would rather avoid. Most men would.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 04:56 AM
3

Guessing you wouldn't even hear about this if he was French or Italian.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:37 PM
2

"...we ask comedians..." OK sure.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:33 PM
2

Fuck I thought it was the other way round so I was holding back. I have a lot of catching up to do!
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:32 PM
1

Fake/Fraud News Network.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:51 PM
12

You mean FNN.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:21 AM
2

There are some good Chrome extensions for screenshotting webpages. Nice thing about screenshots is you don't depend on archive.is staying alive...
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:19 AM
1

I wish this was a thing.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 09:46 PM
7

Imagine a legal system that required evidence. Maybe in China or North Korea? Definitely not America.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 12:22 PM
1

Equality is sexist duh. Chivalry is the new equality.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:09 AM
29

Just make it a subreddit already.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:53 PM
26

What's bizarre is that their blind recruitment test technically worked. It's just that it removed discrimination against the wrong group, men who were actually being discriminated against. Now they want to bring back that gender (and race apparently) discrimination that was already there. Wrap your head around that.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:49 PM
1

Sorry I was busy writing my comment on this submission in another comment and you beat me to it :)
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:22 AM
1

Reading the appeal (of the first case) is extremely interesting: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/vic/VSCA/2007/77.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=Michael%20Cardamone This was his version of events: put to the complainant that she was going across the yard for a shower at about 8am on the morning of the offending, wrapped in a doona, holding a towel when she saw the applicant. It was put that the complainant asked the applicant for a cigarette and followed him into the toilet. Ne…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:18 AM
3

You can protect a dog, you can protect a girl, but not a boy.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:18 PM
6

Of course when it's a girl the accused men are still guilty even after charges are dropped due to lack of evidence: http://archive.is/SwE1z
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:06 AM
1

Sounds like killing those feminists would be valid and lawful self defense.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:28 AM
19

Or maybe she is delivering another MRA to the world...
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:57 PM
2

Stop giving the cunt publicity
/r/MensRights28/06/17 03:43 AM
7

But liberals are good for men! Fuckwits go back to mens lib.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 03:32 AM

Girls are stupid. Rape and kill them.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:50 AM
1

Yep. There is another absurd reason too. If the marriage is conditional on the prenup, it is therefore coercion and invalid. Even though the whole point of a prenup is a condition for the marriage agreement to take place. Prenups could basically be called marriage conditions, yet that is a good enough reason to invalidate them. Dont. Get. Married.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:22 PM
2

If true this is a truly Good Thing. And the number of fucktards on here who still don't get that liberal politics is bad for men ffs.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 08:03 PM
3

It's heresy to point out the Emperor is not wearing any clothes.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:01 PM
2

As a man going MGTOW, I don't really give a damn.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:20 AM
11

Then they hit the workforce in the real world and it all comes crumbling down.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 09:50 AM
1

Too busy going MGTOW?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:40 AM
6

Whiny male feminists.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:38 AM
15

Imagine if this was a boy who encouraged a girl to kill herself. They would be after his blood.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:35 PM
5

And if an underage boy has sex with an under age girl OLDER than him, he is the one charged with underage sex, not her. Fucked up place.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:03 PM
3

The prosecutor described that 'an intrusive investigation into aspects of her private life and sexual history' ensued as suspicions over the honesty of her account arose. Funny these investigations only happen after the man has gone to jail, not before. Because beforehand the gestapo pigs only care about railroading men into prison and dont give a fuck about evidence or investigation.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 10:56 AM
1

Society is undeserving of fathers and the sacrifice they make.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 11:38 AM
-1

The liberal media would be celebrating him otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 10:55 AM
3

Even if she's leaning back?
/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:11 PM
2

The end result was the Court of Appeal said the prosecution CANT change their case - they have to continue with their original argument. The problem is they already presented evidence to the jury of the conversation which shows she did consent and then wanted to stop. Like I said - they fucked up. Although impossible to know the actual result, although lack of reporting in the media may suggest the likely outcome of not guilty.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:20 PM
1

So the 90% that don't end up in court count as a hell of a lot of false accusations.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:18 PM
11

Dont forget - this was the original rape propaganda media conspiracy that then became Brock Turner after this one blew up like a hand grenade. They were trying to manufacture worldwide rape hysteria over a single college event, and they got it in the end. Don't underestimate the extent the worldwide liberal media conspires against men. Good news story tho.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:40 PM
3

Im hoping he was found not guilty, but it is impossible to know as the courts dont publish not guilty verdicts. The media usually does publish guilty verdicts so there is some reason to be hopeful. That being said, if he was found guilty and appeals (a certainty), the result of the appeal will be published but ir would be months away.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:30 PM
3

Who better to ask if accused people are guilty than the prosecution!
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:26 PM
1

Good news.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:47 PM
1

You did?
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:45 PM
1

Will they?
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:35 PM
28

"received bonuses way beyond the level of her previous earnings purely as a result of her employment and ... without any contribution, either domestic or business, from her husband." Yet all those lazy housewives are of course responsible for their husbands work success. The courts are beyond a joke.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:22 PM
2

Which part?
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:14 PM
17

If anyone hasn't noticed, it has been standard practice for a few years now for police to set up stings with rape accusers against men where they try and entrap them. So if you ever get a call from a girl who wants to "talk about what happened that night" ... just hang the fuck up and get a lawyer.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:43 AM
9

Well except there was no suggestion or evidence of that...so I guess not.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:41 AM
7

Feminism is good for men too! And don't forget this similar case: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284677/Compulsive-liar-Elizabeth-Jones-cried-rape-11-times-jailed.html "Because women don't lie about rape!"
/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:07 AM
-10

the title is fine.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 10:58 AM

but that's not to say all "he said she said" are lies This sub draws strawmen like moths to a flame. Fuck off cunt.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 10:20 AM
4

I love this: But prosecutor John Price QC said: “That was a wrongful conviction. Mahad Cassim was innocent. “The person responsible for the grave injustice was the defendant, through her false allegation and perjured evidence. She maintains that falsity still.” But how can he be innocent if the jury believed the cunt? Oh you mean their magic lie detection skills might be wrong sometimes? So question -- how can we ever have confidence in a rape conviction based on the cunts word alone? How are th…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:37 AM
1

The judge, jury and prosecution responsible should be jailed as well.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:29 AM
1

That would be good.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 08:49 PM
2

It's like asking "when did the Jews win recently" during the Holocaust.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:16 PM
3

What happens when these pampered cunts hit the workforce? Are companies going to give them "take home" jobs so they find it easier? Or are they just going to employ men who can and will do the actual job with competence and wont expect the company to pay for their choice to get pregnant?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 08:50 PM
3

Good news! British men need this.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 08:38 AM
3

Maybe men should....go their own way instead? I will term it MGTOW.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 07:40 PM
1

All better than "getting the help and support she needs".
/r/MensRights07/06/17 12:31 PM
-1

Death sentence for false accusers regardless of age.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 08:46 PM
3

She raped him, she was convicted of rape, and is a rapist.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:35 PM
0

And I still get downvoted here when I say men should avoid cunts like the plague in every way to avoid getting gang-raped by a pack of family court judges. At least I'll follow my own advice.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:24 AM
1

Has anyone studied modern day women and the cluster fuck personality disorder psychopathy most of them present?
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:22 AM
7

A fat cunt of a "diversity officer", that's what.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:21 AM
-4

Get the fuck out mangina cunt.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:31 AM
2

Wow he triggers good. Impressive.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:28 AM
0

Polly want a cracker?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:23 AM
-1

but if 51 steps up and she says no, then that means he does not have her consent Strawman. You really are pathetic.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:10 AM
2

LOL
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:20 AM
2

Pretty sad for a country that came up with the Magna Carta.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 01:54 AM
1

Or - how do you turn a mangina or feminist into an MRA?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 01:00 AM
3

r/triggered
/r/MensRights03/06/17 11:50 PM
0

You sure got butthurt Stop projecting you sad fuck.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 11:38 PM
-4

[34M4F] My wife is dying, so I guess I need a new sub! by comey2012 in BDSMpersonals [–]PIG_CUNT [-1] -7 points 3 days ago Suave you are not. You do know how to dry a pussy up though.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:17 PM
26

It's more than that. Rape show trials usually involve either implicit or explicit suggestions that a woman would not engage in this kind of sex, because what young woman would fuck a guy she just met in the park right? Her sexual history therefore becomes a relevant piece of evidence directly refuting a prosecution claim, or jury bias. The Ched Evans case was a classic - what's the bet the jury originally convicted him because "what young girl would gang-bang with a group of footballers"? Well a…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:02 PM
38

What does it say about a society that condemns human rights activists for standing up for basic rights hundreds of years old?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:47 PM
8

Body image transforms into hairline anxiety.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:52 AM
2

she denied the claims and said she had been raped by the children. Soon this will be the default defence of females who rape children.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 08:52 PM
7

Hopefully it affects the minds of juries.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 01:11 PM
25

we can see what his defence is going to be "Police" don't investigate rape claims. They just conspire with accusers to obtain a conviction without any evidence. And yet juries "believing the cunt" on word alone is still seen as a safe verdict and proved beyond reasonable doubt. Incredible.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 10:34 AM
2

That's awesome!
/r/MensRights02/06/17 09:22 AM
1

Heterosexual sex. They are personally offended by the idea.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 08:35 AM
1

Let's hope it is successful as Ghost Busters.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 03:48 AM
27

Rape crisis experts say women don't make up accusations. Translation: Lying ideological feminists know the house of cards comes crumbling down if there is public awareness of the huge amount of false accusations that constantly occur.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 09:36 PM
1

He really was convicted of rape and jailed for it too. It was while he was in jail that the retrial happened and the original verdict was overturned. When a verdict is overturned, it is overturned in retrospect. It's like it never happened. At best you can say he was wrongly convicted of rape. she said was "one-time convicted rapist" - which is true. No, what would be true is to say he was one-time wrongly convicted of rape. The conviction was nullified, which affects the past. Therefore he wasn…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:52 PM
1

Never heard of him...but yes it will be fun to watch him go down.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:58 AM
2

That's true. So is this Its not really. She still called him a rapist. but gets round it That's not how defamation law works. But I doubt there's a case there Is that your professional opinion or are you just winging it?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:00 PM
5

Unlike Brock Turner, she was actually convicted of rape.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:42 PM
3

Are only the innocent allowed a fair trial?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:04 AM
9

They claim mental illess, yet in almost every case admit struggling to cope with life change, crying babies etc. This is just legal murder, and this particular case was farce - she murders all three kids by driving into a lake, but due to the age of one and her gender she gets handed just 12 months for that death, yet 10 years each for the two older kids. The law is an ass.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:02 AM
1

Then the best thing you can do is encourage others to go MGTOW too. Telling people it is OK to associate with women is plain irresponsible.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:12 PM
1

Actually avoiding them solves all problems on an individual level, and is much easier than waiting for society to change. You should try it!
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:07 PM
1

Nothing extreme about protecting yourself in a misandrist society. And talking to a woman is the first step to all sorts of problems.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 08:35 PM
1

There is a conspiracy. The media, government, universities work in concert to promote feminism in order to engage in social engineering, because broken families mean $$$ and working women (the cause of the former) mean depressed wages and more slave labor. You think we live in a free society...
/r/MensRights30/05/17 08:01 PM
1

No, manginas can get the fuck out. The day we can't talk about divorce rape on this sub is the day it dies.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:54 PM
-12

Or why don't you fuck off to r menslib?
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:38 AM
14

Until they found out he didn't want a relationship the next day.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:27 AM
15

I know! 3 incidents over 40 fucking years equates to "40 years of sexism and abuse".
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:36 AM
1

What are you quoting?
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:00 AM

Sounds like someone just got his man-period...try rubbing it out, that's a good girl.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:37 AM
-16

Said by no man who got divorced raped ever.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:29 AM
-12

Being scared is the first step to awareness and self protection. Stay the fuck away from women outside of a brothel.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:41 AM
1

In terms of what law they're charged with, yes. So if the law doesn't capture assaulting a child because it is defined in sentencing guidelines, why are they passing a new law now if not to define a new offence? No it doesn't. And you've yet to show me where the law doesn't recognise female perpetrators. Unless the law is merely updating guidelines, then yes it does. That's what criminal law means. And if you have heard of men being arrested after reporting abuse themselves you can understand ho…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:59 AM
80

Never heard of a man being given anonymity due to an adult accuser though.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 12:37 AM
1

It's currently treated as any other domestic violence charge. So assaulting a child is treated the same as assaulting as adult? Doubtful. Laws in the UK can have circumstances of aggravation, If defined in statute the essentially defines a new offence, "aggravated X". The point is they are changing the law to protect children using language that does not recognize female perpetrators, when they could be talking about Child Abuse that much more easily invokes notions of female abusers. Yet the te…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 12:21 AM
96

I thought that only applied with underage children.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 12:08 AM
1

everything that can be considered child abuse is already illegal under their own laws Except "domestic violence directed at children" apparently. No it doesn't, all crimes in the UK work in that way So you're saying they aren't passing a new law, just updating sentencing guidelines? Are the sentencing guidelines even defined in statute? Citation of language is needed. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model
/r/MensRights29/05/17 11:35 PM
1

Domestic violence is defined by the UK government, child abuse isn't. Maybe it's about time? Or is the a plan to send kids back into the coal mines if the economy takes a dive. It's illegal, but its not an actual crime you can be charged with Right, that's some kind of law! No, its a new aggravated factor that can be applied to an existing crime That essentially defines a new offence. The point is they could have defined it however they chose. Because luckily the UK government isn't made up of p…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:07 PM
5

Lying in the Family Court is pretty much standard operating procedure to this day.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:04 PM
1

Child abuse is an umbrella term used to cover lots of crimes LOL but DV isn't? Of course child abuse is illegal, but people are charged with what ever crime they commited, there is no crime called "Child abuse" LOL. It's illegal but it isn't! And are you saying that people charged with DV are never ever charged with assault and such crimes? The new crime would simply create an extra category under the domestic violence charge that has a longer sentence. Like I said, it's a new crime, they can ca…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:44 PM
1

Well it's a new law so I suppose it could be called whatever you want. And what kind of country doesn't outlaw child abuse?
/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:10 PM
10

Answer: because Domestic Violence is Duluth Model term in which only men can be perpetrators.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:58 AM
8

someone has been coerced by an abusive partner to misrepresent their income to Centrelink Women don't need to be forced to lie to the Welfare Agency. There is probably more women in jail for this than just about anything else.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 07:05 AM
15

Camellia revealed she is still struggling to come to terms with the fact that she could still have have her family had Jay not been falsely accused. She says that the woman had contacted her brother before his death to explain someone had put pressure on her to make the claim. Rape persecution is killing innocents. Much like the Family Court system.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:28 PM
2

Yet juries don't have to.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:47 PM
8

It's been damaged since the early 90s. Really think you cant be jailed with no evidence? Look up Jonathan Montgomery, Virginia.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 10:56 AM
16

And it was a mother, so it counts even less.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:32 PM
1

it also gives a boost to the dangerous, deadly, angry male idea that sneaky things like that are just what women do. When it actually happens it's more than an idea.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:53 PM
1

If it takes you six weeks to figure out you were raped, yes.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:48 PM
1

How about don't marry a woman, because all women will so those things. You want to see a woman change? Get divorced from her. How about: don't marry.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:02 AM
2

Beverley Tillyer allowed three different boys, all aged 14, to have sex with her. Sex occurred at her home, where they were allowed to drink and take drugs. Talk about victim blaming. She plied young children with drugs and alcohol and raped them. And will be out of jail in little over a year. initially denied carrying out any abuse and claimed she had been raped by the boys. Beliiiieve the victimcunt!
/r/MensRights25/05/17 12:33 AM
1

young women Look at women in their 30s who steal large sums from their employers, I think you'll find a lot of them go straight to jail.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:09 PM
1

Which is strange as it's usually theft and fraud when women are most reliably jailed. The government loves to protect itself and companies from women, but when men and children are the victims, they can fuck off.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 11:11 AM
16

Coming next: retrospective rape.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:38 AM
8

You're both doing hard time. :/
/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:38 AM
7

I am less concerned about how it affects the presumption of evidence - I would argue that has already been thrown away - than the fact it probably turns 99% of consensual sex into rape.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:27 AM
4

Of course it did, now take your pills dear.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:55 AM
-12

Why did Hitler kill millions of Jews?
/r/MensRights23/05/17 11:55 PM
42

The law ought to be held in absolute contempt.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:04 PM
1

OK Doc.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 06:45 AM
1

Yep
/r/MensRights22/05/17 08:16 PM
1

So...do you have any local insights?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:46 PM
1

Nothing about the way they report this is normal, or at least normal for a 36yo male teacher who fucked a 13yo female student.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:46 PM
5

We have a real life pedophile here. Please go somewhere else.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:45 PM
6

If you legalize child sex you will have all these adults lining up to exploit children and then saying they wanted it. Maybe some of them did, but is that what we want? A big orgy of adults fucking 13 year olds? It is not. This sub is anti pedophilia/child sex abuse. Go to Mens Lib if you feel otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:29 PM
3

Sounds like a great place to have an arranged marriage.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 11:40 AM
92

This is maliciously false reporting. Fathers Groups are not saying that children should be forced to see father who are proven to be violent abusers. They are saying that unproven allegations by the mother without any evidence or history of violence should not determine custody outcomes. And it's this sort of malice that the Family Holocaust Court is based on, and basically defines feminism.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 10:53 AM
12

feminist cunt reporter Are there any other kind?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 10:47 AM
1

More like blames the victim.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 10:47 AM
9

Sounds like an incentive to commit crime.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:49 AM
1

Not at all. You might want to reread what you wrote. If attraction to adolescents is 'normal' for other adolescents and for adults, then both are 'pedophile' or not. Not if your definition of 'pedophile' is an adult who wants to rape little kids. the assumption is implicit 'appeal to nature'. If it is "their nature" to be attracted, it is normal. If it is normal, it is okay. Not at all. It might be in the nature of a pedophile to rape children, but it is not normal nor OK. Regardless of whether …
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:42 AM
0

I'm pretty sure I was closely paraphrasing what you said...and yes "pointing out a fallacy" that never occurred is pretty much textbook strawman behavior. I notice you never answered the question...or is admitting being a middle aged man who wants to rape adolescents too shameful to admit?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:03 AM
4

Oh you don't think women getting slaps on the wrist for raping her students is a mens rights issue...I see.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:31 AM
6

We should support this EVERYWHERE. It just makes women even more disastrous employees and makes men so much more attractive compared to an animal that bleeds every month but doesn't die.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:15 AM
3

I'm a bit disappointing he hasn't withdrawn the Dear Colleague letter yet and shut down campus kangaroo rape courts. Although there has been talk about it and it could still happen.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:12 AM
0

Polly want another cracker?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:06 AM
1

http://archive.is/5iesb Can't wait for the classic 1984 speech from NSW Police: "we have concluded the investigation and will not be making any further comment".
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:05 AM
1

Pointing out you're using a fallacy is not a strawman. A strawman is drawing someone's argument into an extreme irrational position to more easily defeat, like don quixote Which is exactly what you tried rather badly to do, so I guess you just argued yourself into a corner. Both are true. Psychiatry has resisted classifying adolescent attraction as a mental disorder. Look it up. So according to u/mwobuddy kids who are attracted to each other have a mental disorder, but his desire to rape adolesc…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 05:56 AM
13

Not only do we have /r/PussyPass, but the more uplifting /r/pussypassdenied!
/r/MensRights22/05/17 05:52 AM
0

"appeal to nature" fallacy. Ah, the old strawman, the last resort of the mentally challenged SJW trapped in a corner (which usually occurs early in a debate). Interestingly, the entire field of psychiatry is based on the concept of what society considers "normal", and a mental disorder is defined as behavior that veers from that norm. And you obviously don't even understand your own argument: to appeal to nature, I would have had to argue that it was good for children to be attracted to children…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 05:43 AM
1

Children being attracted to children is called normal. 5yo boys and girls are attracted to each other and are not paedos. Sex abuse is not always paedophilia. But paedophilia is always sexual abuse (when acted on).
/r/MensRights22/05/17 05:05 AM
5

But they were quoting the judge during sentencing, so it would have been obvious it was referring to the day of sentence not the day the article was being read. Nice try though.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:36 AM
1

The pedophiles are out strong today...and it's always the same...mwobuddy, thepigman, sillymod...and no only older adults can be pedophiles.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:00 AM
23

Wow read this The packed courtroom also heard that the two-year federal penitentiary sentence was a significant one, especially given that McLaren had no criminal record before she faced these charges. Hunter acknowledged that McLaren’s crimes rocked a small close-knit community and “clearly the court needs to respond. The court is mindful that this is of the higher range of sentences (that can be handed to a sex offender).” https://www.insidebelleville.com/news-story/7325595-former-teacher-jacl…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:28 AM
-12

If you want buddy up with a community of child rapists fuck off to Mens Lib.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 11:37 PM
2

It has hit the mainstream, but it is being heavily suppressed by the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:38 PM
-7

If you have trouble understanding that....just stay away from kids.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:37 PM
4

I have met so many people from my generation who have grown up to realize what am evil cunt their mother was and how she used the "family" court to destroy their father. And many happy endings where they manage to rebuild relationships with their father while cutting their mothers out of the picture. It can and does happen! Family law was never about the bests interests of children - it was and always has bee about "freeing women from the tyranny of marriage and their evil patriarchal husbands".
/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:19 PM
-6

Fuck off paedo. Little kids aren't "ready to go", OK?
/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:07 PM
47

We really need a pussy-pass flair.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 09:18 PM
26

not a single new business on the stock market had a woman boss. You know there is a simple solution to that - start a successful company! Or is there a entrepreneurial capability gap as well?
/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:41 AM
1

MGTOWs don't even have to worry about this bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:18 AM
18

Too busy going MGTOW.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 08:46 AM
10

Why don't you try it on yourself and let us know the result?
/r/MensRights21/05/17 06:18 AM
2

Brock Turner was the backup plan to Rolling Stone, an orchestrated piece of rape propaganda organized by a worldwide liberal media conspiracy.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:49 AM
2

Is it? If someone says "Yes, but no not here" are they really withdrawing consent to sex or just expressing concern about where they are doing it? And if she otherwise doesn't resist or move away or do anything else? I agree consent can be withdrawn but the way it is withdrawn needs to be clear...and things often aren't clear. When she said "stop" did she mean "I am not consenting" or "we should stop we might get caught"? I am not sure what he "admitted" in court but the article doesn't really s…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:50 AM
3

Ok bro, fights over, back to your moms basement.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:37 AM
2

Well if thats the best you've got on me, Ill chalk that up as a win.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:32 AM
1

had agreed to sex with Young, who was 18 at the time of the 2011 assault, but did not want to do it at school So she agreed to have sex...just not at school.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:30 AM
5

She was a drunk fifthy whore who assaulted him repeatedly, forcing him to take action to defend himself. The cunt then jumps off a balcony like the stupid whore she obviously was, and he gets blamed because he's a man. Imagine if the genders were reversed...girl has a date who starts beating the shit out of her, she somehow manages to lock him out on the balcony and he takes a dive. She would be congratulated not prosecuted. This is a classic mens rights case involving lots of elements including…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:26 AM
2

So he admits he's a cuck...nothing we didn't already know.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 03:51 AM
2

Fuck off cuck.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 02:45 AM
7

The press only does glamour shots of women, especially child rapists.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:30 AM
3

OK Chief, not sure how I will get along without being able to prove you wrong over and over, but I'll try my best.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:24 AM
4

The typical Guardian narrative is that she got a deferred sentence because she's white. What planet are you on? The Guardian on Planet Earth definitely isn't saying that. Next time stay out of topics you can't understand, ok? Aww someones got all frustrated now haven't they? Maybe you should go watch some soccer to take your mind of these complex and difficult subjects.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:14 AM
1

Whats also interesting is how they dont publish her profile. Remember when Tostee got a girlfriend after he was found innocent? They were publishing her photos and identifying her in every which way, now someone threatens to kill him and they cover up the profile name. The hostility towards men in the media is vile and vicious. I'm just so glad we live in an age with the internet and we can bypass their bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:11 AM
16

Brock Tuner: young, white, promising swimmer with bright future ahead, no criminal convictions or history of violence, drunkenly fingered a drunk girl who then passed out after a party. Castrate and kill him! Lavinia Woodward: young, white, bright student with promising future ahead, drug addict with a history of domestic violence who violently stabbed and then assaulted her boyfriend with a laptop and jars. Don't spoil her career!
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:07 AM
4

When they are quoting ACTUAL BARRISTERS, it does not matter what publication is quoting them When they are selectively finding people to quote to support their narrative it doesn't matter if the person is an OH MY GOD AN ACTUAL BARRISTER or some homeless guy on the street. The judge followed the guidelines - the same guidelines that apply equally to men and women, blacks, whites, asians, gays, straights, rich people, poor people. Right - point me to that part of the guidelines that refer to not …
/r/MensRights20/05/17 11:45 PM
2

Oh yeah lets hear from the Guardian on the pussy pass....let me guess they dont think women should go to jail eva? Fuckwit.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 11:15 PM
8

and personal mitigation including a promising career. Ms Woodward’s offence is more serious in the statutory hierarchy of violent offences; however she has what appears to be powerful mitigation relating to her reported issues with substance misuse and history as a victim of domestic violence None of those factors are considered mitigating factors in the sentence guidelines, look at the second page of the first image. This is not a legal opinion, just a really bad opinion.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 10:44 PM
3

Judge is a sad joke. Like the justice system.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:29 PM
8

'complete one off' Is that what they are calling a first offence these days?
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:49 AM
3

Concern trollolylo
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:37 AM

One of the earliest lesson the white cunt learns is that she can get any boy in big trouble by saying he did something bad.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 02:32 PM
2

Because children can't consent to sex with adults?
/r/MensRights19/05/17 08:03 AM
1

The reason the law created was to pursue cases where Australia has no legal jurisdiction but where the local law was ineffective or weak.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 12:11 AM
10

It's interesting that America considers Australia to be one of those countries with insufficient protections for child rape victims to justify it's own "travelling overseas for child sex" laws.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:16 PM
9

R was the victim of a violent, abusive and controlling husband. She believed that he would cause her and their daughter serious bodily harm or death and that she had no safe avenue of escape other than having him killed. And this was their opening line. Wow. No discussion about the veracity of those claims. What is extraordinary is the family court, which is heavily biased against men, did not find as such, and even gave him full custody. For the family court to do that usually means the mother …
/r/MensRights18/05/17 06:59 PM
9

http://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/w5/justice-system-scrutinized-woman-hires-hitman-but-goes-free-1.2079731 Wow what a fucked up justice system. Do any Canadian mras have the text to the Supreme Court judgement? Must be an amazing read. And the wiki page reads line an Orwellian whitewashing, it doesn't even mention the word divorce: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Ryan
/r/MensRights18/05/17 05:58 PM
1

Did they have "rape accuser shield laws" in 1930s Alabama?
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:53 AM
204

What might shock you is he would have had less chance of a fair trial today. Hope to be able to interrogate a rape accuser in front of a jury to prove she's lying? Forget about it. Feminism would have hung that man.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 11:09 AM
3

Every conviction without evidence is unsafe, simple as that.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:55 AM
5

“at this point in time, marriage has assumed a generally accepted social definition of an act of freedom and of accepting responsibility for oneself, as well as a place for sharing life with someone, but, a situation that could end, nevertheless”. Therefore, it is necessary to consider that “protecting a certain lifestyle that an ex-partner had maintained during marriage should not be viewed as a relevant judicial aim.“ Such rational thought. Imagine a family court that isn't trying to inflict a…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:00 PM
8

This is terrible. It supports the idea that accusations can be pursued without evidence. Independent evidence should be required at all stages, from establishing probable cause to pursuing charges to running a trial. A word enough from a group known to have a pathological tendency towards making false accusations should never be sufficient.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 06:45 AM
8

Who are they having kids with? A turkey baster?
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:36 PM
5

Bringing pointless cases to court is Allison Saunders, DPP's specialty.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 08:40 PM
4

It is the men's right movement. The practical side of it. I thought everyone knew this now. mrm: theory and activism. mgtow: practice for ones own life. redpill: alternative practice for those who want to game the system.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:36 PM
4

No, just stupid. MGTOW all the way.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:32 PM
10

This is why we go MGTOW. Also why I would never be a volunteer firefighter...imagine you might be called to save the house of one of these evil women. MGTOW is literally the only safe path for men. Pity they don't teach it in schools.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 12:10 PM
32

And 10% experienced some morning after regrets.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:49 AM
0

No, really you are stupid. Dogshit stupid. The fact you can't see the disparate consequences for lying/perjury as the common issue here proves that. The only thing wrong for this sub is YOU.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:49 PM
1

Can you reference similar cases (individual vs. company) where the liar is female and the punishment is less severe? He wasn't making that argument, so strawman. trying to connect this story to family courts The connection is lies, lies, lies, and how little consequence females face for making them in the family court system. I thought the title was pretty clear - you must be stupid.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:22 PM
3

Of course being a good father gets you a reduced sentence too?
/r/MensRights10/05/17 08:33 PM
10

More like "shit post".
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:48 PM
25

who think opinions are the same as facts Coming from her....that's the Duke of Westminster. What I like about this is 15yo boys are fighting back against the feminazi brainwashing regime...if you're reading this keep up the fight!
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:47 PM
9

He'll be a hardcore MRA in 20 years time. For good reason.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:48 PM
1

Not even pretend transwomens? Do they still get a opinion if they become a transman?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:09 AM
12

"I accept that she did not, in her own mind, intend to convey consent to sexual intercourse." She got down on her hands and knees with her arse up in the air...that's more than consent, it's an invitation!
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:00 AM
0

"I've been helping women make rape claims for 10 years..." Yeah sure not a troll.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 03:28 AM
-6

redditor for 1 hour Fuck off troll.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 11:27 PM
1

What's important is she lost. That's all that matters.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 11:25 PM
1

Hehehe http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/whats-being-said-about-the-fairfax-cuts/news-story/f0c2c5a394a5f00eff48183f8f3b09ba
/r/MensRights03/05/17 10:27 AM
4

And the Guardian is literally begging for donations...hope they die next.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:26 AM
12

He was clearly guilty of being accused of anything by a female.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 07:19 AM
4

Sounds like the kind of cognitive dissonance that would be accepted at a kangaroo campus rape court.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 07:18 AM
3

He believes in the victims tears.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 12:44 AM
5

I'm ok with it ;)
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:44 PM
28

Oh, but if it's children being killed that's Child Abuse not Domestic Violence and the term "child abuse" has become virtually a taboo term in western society. Ever wondered why? Because women commit the vast majority of it. But "protecting children from their mothers" is a antithetical concept in the West.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:27 PM
276

This case should be standard reading for every rape jury in the world ever. YES WOMEN WILL LIE ABOUT RAPE IN FRONT OF A JURY TEARS AND ALL. IT IS NEVER SAFE TO CONVICT WITHOUT EVIDENCE.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:13 PM
0

No, they are all about a real man wants a traditional family and kids, and TRP is the way to get it. The risks are worth it, taking risks is manly. The are traditionalists at heart. They even have a flair for marriage and LTR.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:24 AM
-1

The mum counts as collateral damage.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:05 AM
-2

TRP advocates redpill marriage, where you use redpill techniques on your wife. I have tried to explain that the courts don't change, and they are the problem. What if you want a divorce instead? You're still getting divorce raped. They don't listen.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:03 AM
1

Concern trolling.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:36 AM
-4

They advise men to get married. No MRAs there.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:35 AM
11

MGTOW. MGTOW. MGTOW.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:33 AM
2

Do an AMA!
/r/MensRights01/05/17 11:09 PM
5

peoplemen
/r/MensRights01/05/17 11:09 PM
3

Thank you Allison Saunders!
/r/MensRights01/05/17 09:00 PM
1

[–]Cooperfly 2363 points 3 days ago Tentacle porn. In the beginning it started as just a curiosity... just like the rest of porn I'm now addicted to. permalinksavereportgive goldreply [–]Sqrlchez 1372 points 3 days ago The reason there are tentacles is so that they don't have to blur the ducks in hentai. permalinksaveparentreportgive goldreply [–]Ndvorsky 1 point 2 days ago Then they blur it anyway!
/r/MensRights01/05/17 01:22 AM
2

Lol imagine this cunt behind the keyboard IRL. Comes to a mens rights sub and then tells MRAs to go somewhere else. Gotta love it.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 10:30 PM
3

Concern troll.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 10:28 PM
2

Go contemplate it somewhere else?
/r/MensRights30/04/17 10:09 PM
0

No really.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 10:05 PM
5

Oh yes mam, right away mam. Looks like this cunt got lost on the way to 2x and ended up at a mens rights sub...what are the odds?
/r/MensRights30/04/17 08:59 PM
17

saying they "lacked curiosity." More like "proceeded without evidence or probable cause". The fact these women are effectively licensed by the law to commit these crimes shows the legal system itself no longer has any credibility and should be treated as such.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 08:56 PM
-2

Fuck off concern troll.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 08:50 PM
1

Nice. Although I searched Steam Curators for this group and it came up with nothing.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 08:39 PM
0

I'm OK with this. Funnel girls into what will become a dead-end career where they will be run in circles by even half-competent male programmers. Add in the risk of sexual harassment allegations and the cost of pregnancy (to employers) and you have created one of the most undesirable groups of employees in the country.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 08:36 PM
11

If you dismiss the research on social issues as some sort of conspiracy, then you cannot expect your opinions to be taken seriously. By who? Some random cunt on the internet? Ok... nor do they generally neglect their children's needs while putting all their money into video poker machines How can they, they are spending it all on their ice addiction!
/r/MensRights30/04/17 08:33 PM
10

paying far less than half the cost of raising a child Only if they earn les than that amount. Fathers on good incomes pay through the nose, before tax. sociologists do research Lol you mean feminists write fiction and claim it is research. everybody dismisses father's-rights issues as No, that's called political correctness. People are afraid to point out the emperor has no clothes, nothing has changed.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 08:09 PM
0

Probably after remarriage (didn't learn the first time).
/r/MensRights30/04/17 02:30 PM
-2

At least these cunts will have about as much luck finding a job as your average arts student. That's if they ever graduate from being a perpetual student and campus agitator.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 02:22 PM
9

Yeah your right, single mothers are too stupid and busy draining their "child support" money into poker machines to save it for a new car...or child braces.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 02:15 PM
12

Fathers already pay far, far in excess of the ordinary weekly costs of raising a child, so why cant that excess pay for all these extras? So the parasite single mother can drive her new BMW x5 of course!
/r/MensRights30/04/17 10:59 AM
7

I think you mean "alleged victims of rape". I don't think victims of false accusations will be believed as a starting point, or any other crime for that matter.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:47 AM
3

401k
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:11 PM
13

Womens are never to blame cuz that would be sexist.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 11:08 AM
4

without sufficient investigation. You mean accusations need to be investigated? What happened to believing the victim?
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:59 AM
2

Sounds like the best interest of the kid is being well looked after /s
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:55 AM
23

A made up epidemic to justify a horrific violation of human rights. Sounds like every pogrom in history.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 11:37 AM
4

Protein loss via seminal fluid means that, since hair is primarily composed of protein, your locks may fall out if you have some kind of protein deficiency. Err...no. Masturbation increases testosterone...there is a reason all "hair loss" treatments are basically just testosterone-inhibitors.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:51 PM
4

Conley has not been arrested nor have any charges been filed against him Yet he is named in the media while the woman is anonymous. Even though there are no laws protecting identity of accusers in the US.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:41 PM
1

Or come to /r/mensrightsnews - only quality content allowed.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:02 PM
2

Link doesn't work.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:08 AM
7

Much easier to fight when you are not being raped by the family courts or in jail.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:25 AM
1

I created it. So yes.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:21 AM
1

But most people have given supportive replies to my thread? I mean the MODS are hidden feminists. Most folk don't know but I have been here a long time. How is it higher quality content? Did you read the sidebar? No memes, shitposts, "i was banned from r feminism posts", concern trolling, "look at what this person said" posts etc.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:11 AM
1

/r/mensrights is also run by male feminists who don't think men falsey accused of rape have the right to mount a defense in court or assert their accusers are lying. I suspect the Reddit admins have either infiltrated or put pressure on the admins to take a feminist line. r menslib = openly feminist. r mensrights = hidden feminists and shitty submission quality. r mensrightsnews = anti-feminist and much higher quality content.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:44 AM
4

Every MRA should also be going MGTOW.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:32 AM
0

Sick of shitposts like this? Come over to /r/mensrightsnews.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 01:32 AM
1

LOL imagine this cunt IRL.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:15 PM
1

Sick of reading about the feminism sub on a men's right sub? Come to /r/mensrightsnews.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 09:54 PM

If you want real MR news, come to /r/mensrightsnews.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:46 PM
3

Concern trolling.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:34 AM
12

Couldn't help notice this article title on the side: Can Having Genital Preferences for Dating Mean You’re Anti-Trans? These are deeply deranged people we are dealing with. Evil.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:28 AM
28

Nor is it a movement designed to advance the rights of one group at the expense of another. LOL. The audacity!
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:16 AM
10

This is reallly going to help all those poor, underpaid women. This is feminism - money and power for elite white women.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:14 AM
1

Hollywood is racist, I know that. But this particular film does not seem the best example of that.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 07:08 AM
1

Feminism hurts women, no doubt about that.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 07:04 AM
1

I know what you are saying, I am saying there were not enough of them to make a clear judgement. If there were 10 Asian guys who were butt-ugly, then I might agree. But there was 1 fat mexican guy who was his friend...I just don't know if that is enough to say it was racism.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:46 AM
1

wat? I said NON-WHITE friend.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:32 AM
1

I only really saw one non-white guy, his friend, who was fat. Not enough to go on really...
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:24 AM
0

This isn't about remorse. And in Australia remorse can only be considered a mitigating factor, not an aggravating factor in the absence of. So that is a moot point. This is about the right of someone to not only plead guilty, but mount a defense. The judge explicitly said that he was considering the fact he mounted a defense an aggravating factor. That is extraordinary and I have never heard of such a thing in a western legal system or in fact in Russia, China or North Korea. And you are a waste…
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:16 AM
1

That's your assertion - the judge said differently.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:13 AM
1

BULLSEYE.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:13 AM
1

Do you have a trailer link or something that shows it? I know nothing about this movie.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 05:41 AM
0

OK chief, why don't you enlighten us?
/r/MensRights25/04/17 05:30 AM
1

Yes, and he got punished for it.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 05:29 AM
0

The judge was clear and you're obviously wrong.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 05:10 AM
1

It's called forensic disadvantage.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 02:29 AM
2

MGTOW is the only way to stay safe.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 02:11 AM
1

Yet in the 21st century, child beating, especially by mothers, remains protected by law.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 01:11 AM
3

That's almost a WHOLE year, wow!
/r/MensRights25/04/17 01:01 AM
3

because the prosecution simply won't run the case if there's no evidence LOL
/r/MensRights25/04/17 12:33 AM
5

So you're saying people accused of sex crimes can't mount a defence? You must love college kangaroo courts - they don't even allow a defence lawyer!
/r/MensRights25/04/17 12:04 AM
1

You're imagining things. Try reading the article.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 12:02 AM
1

This isn't about remorse, read the title. He is actually being punished for mounting a defense, a natural and inseparable part of pleading not guilty. Can you really be punished more for pleading not guilty on top of the punishment for the crime itself?
/r/MensRights24/04/17 11:18 PM
4

Does that mean men accused of rape aren't allowed to mount a defence?
/r/MensRights24/04/17 11:07 PM
1

Want a better mens rights sub? Come over here: /r/mensrightsnews!
/r/MensRights24/04/17 10:52 PM
2

Nope. He said he was not being punished for taking the case to trial. He pretty much did say he was being punished for mounting a defence.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 10:21 PM
1

Not really, no.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 10:04 PM
0

Please come and contribute to /r/mensrightsnews. The MODS on this sub have been revealed to be feminists.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:02 PM
2

THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF CONCERN TROLLING.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:01 PM
8

The man is being sent to prison because he was found guilty. Sounds like he got extra time for defending himself in court. That's the point of all this.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 08:23 PM
52

Looks like it has actually happened.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 11:30 AM
56

You're missing the point. He wasn't just convicted on no evidence. That has been happening for a long time. He was actually punished for defending himself against the allegations.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 11:29 AM
34

Interestingly, here are some Victorian Appeal Court judges doing the same thing by suggesting that accusers might be fabricating claims, of course in this case the accused were female. To be clear, these are the words of actual Judges not defence lawyers: The judges gave nine reasons for their decision, including "a real likelihood" the two complainants had collaborated and "a real possibility of concoction" Accusing the complainants of lying? The horrors.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:38 AM
18

MGTOW is like the whole-of-life equivalent of not walking down a dark alley at night.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:21 AM
130

Of course if he had been found innocent, the Judge could have only have commended him on a well fought case. He stressed he was not punishing him for going to trial, or criticising his lawyers, who were acting on Fieldew's own instructions. Leaving well and truly open the fact that he is punishing him for claiming the accusations were false. The judge said Fieldew had shown no remorse or even regret for his crimes at trial. Bit hard to show remorse judge, I'm pleading not guilty! Imagine that - …
/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:19 AM
4

Alliance Goals. To achieve this, we need to ensure the application of the three pillars of justice: Presumption of innocence. Impartial investigation. Burden of proof. Its like British law has been set back 500 years.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 07:04 AM
4

Do they get men friendly family courts too?
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:56 AM
2

Hehe I like this guy...
/r/MensRights23/04/17 07:18 PM
3

Yes, you have my permission.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 09:43 AM
1

That's what you call a direct hit + maximum damage. We need more of these operations until Battleship Huffington is blown out of the water.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 09:08 AM
1

Lucky police need probable cause to arrest people in America. Oh wait, not they don't. Just like Hitler didn't need probably cause to murder 6 million Jews.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 09:05 AM
1

whatever their background Translation: they were black.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:15 AM
3

So women do lie about such terrible things. And they must be pretty good at it as the pigs never seem to catch them until they admit it. Scary thing though - if she was able to trick the police for six months, how hard would it be to trick a jury for a couple of days? Yet amazingly appeal courts find rape convictions "safe" on the basis a cunt sticks to her word for a couple of hours of questioning. Has the UK stopped jailed false rape accusers? There was a string of them for a while. This is th…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:11 AM
4

Seeing her jailed would have been a start.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:05 AM
9

Australia has an extremely toxic, media led, environment of political correctness. There is virtually no public debate as a result, as it's impossible to take a contrarian view without being demonized. There is no free speech protections, and you can be jailed or killed by the government for saying just about anything that offends the left wing establishment. The left wing media is heavily saturated with feminist and other political agitation. They don't even pretend to conduct journalism. Both …
/r/MensRights22/04/17 04:53 PM
1

my wife That was where you went wrong.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 10:02 AM
1

Academia just produces feminist propaganda, finding quality academic work on men's rights is an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 10:00 AM
10

All of them. But that would ruin a good feminist propaganda piece. Funny fox comes out with this after the Bill O'Reilly thing.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 09:58 AM
3

if they have a past with sexual or domestic violence Of course if they had an actual criminal conviction of brutally assaulting another man they are OK.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 08:46 PM
1

But very unsurprising.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 08:44 PM
1

This is just incorrect unfortunately. Sexual activity =/= sex. He was convicted for sexual activity which is the grooming and kissing. Well then my memory is much better than your research skills. He was convicted of fingering her...and he plead not guilty to that. Seriously, how hard did you look for the original trial stories?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 07:42 PM
1

It does have to be independent though.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 07:39 PM
1

Saying an accusation doesn't count as evidence Of course it doesn't. The law has always recognized accusation and evidence as being two completely separate things - one needed to prove the other. As I said, why aren't women charged for make false rape allegations on the mans "evidence" she is lying? Why do the police say they need "evidence" to charge false accusers, if the man's accusation she is lying is already evidence?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 11:45 AM
3

Doesn't mean we should believe them. So you're saying people shouldn't be able to plead not guilty? Do you even think we should have trials at all? The only thing he's claiming not to have done was have sex with her, which I don't think he was convicted He was convicted for underage sex which he denied and for which there was no evidence of. He pleaded guilty to other charges, he was acquitted of others. I'm not exactly sure what your point is here. My point is there is nothing sensational about…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 11:43 AM
3

The point us he pleaded not guilty, there was no evidence, and he maintains his innocence. People are allowed to do that you know.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 08:27 AM
1

You seem to be conflating an accusation with evidence that supports an accusation. An independent witness account might be considered evidence if they are of good character and have no obvious reason to lie. A complaintant is obviously not independent and could have many reasons to lie. Otherwise we wouldn't need trials in the first place would we? If mere accusation was enough, women who accuse rape would be charged with making a false allegation as soon as the man denies it, but they aren't, b…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 06:48 AM
2

Nope. The whole point of a legal system that is little more than a lynching or crucifixion is that accusations need to be supported, or proven, by evidence.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:21 AM
2

Most crimes only have eye witnesses and circumstantial evidence I'm pretty sure most murders have a dead body or at least aa missing person. Assaults have broken bones. Robberies have smashed windows and forces doors. Imagine trying to acaccuse someone of murder without a dead body!
/r/MensRights21/04/17 02:31 AM
6

Yup. You can plead not guilty so long as you are found innocent, if not, the plea of not guilty and maintaining your innocence is taken as an additional crime. He may have been talking crude prison talk, but he is essentially standing up to his original plea by maintaining his innocence. He said nothing that contradicts any earlier position.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 12:15 AM
3

Or the worst form of advertising for feminism.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 10:02 PM
1

There's a word for this: divorce.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:25 PM
11

In fact, before it was revealed to be a hoax, Pillay had published a piece (archive) defending the publication of Garland’s work Make sure we frame that one and stick it on the wall.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:19 PM
11

Err...they were cool with it.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:16 PM
3

Oh you've got to be shitting me. SIR YOU HAVE EARNED YOURSELF A BEER. MUCH BEER.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:15 PM
1

you are claiming that this law states they can convict somebody without evidence Err...that's pretty much exactly what it says, and what it does in effect. As I said, they could have just as easily changed the wording to say "evidence of non-consent" rather than "evidence of resistance", but they chose to abolish the need for evidence at all.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:28 PM
6

Only from impartial witnesses. Accusations are not evidence.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:26 PM
1

This is about presumption of innocence. All it does is confirm rape trials are unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:04 PM
1

Yes I mean sure as in you can actually quote the constitution not sure as in you have a warm fuzzy feeling in your panties.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 11:24 AM
1

It's in the Constitution dumbass Are you sure about that? And no, fucking a bucktoothed maryland whore isn't on my todo list
/r/MensRights20/04/17 11:17 AM
29

Feminism and the sexual revolution have simply made marriage “obsolete” for women LOL I'm sure that's what expiring socially infertile women tell themselves.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 11:15 AM
4

It's good not to delve too deep into her madness - I have a special bottle of beer ageing nicely for the day she kills herself.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 11:00 AM
12

I think the word "other" in the title was redundant. There was simply no evidence at all.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 10:30 AM
4

"Parents don’t need sex selection to get the gender they want...if you play dolls with your son or football with your daughter".
/r/MensRights20/04/17 09:16 AM
19

Call child rape what it is.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:27 AM
1

You're arguing that all they did is change the definition of rape, which is not correct. They are changing evidenciary standards from physical evidence of nonconsent to no evidence at all. They could have just as easily changed the wording of the existing law to "physical evidence of non consent"' And it's well known that women will say "no" while physically consenting to maintain an aura of innocence and denial of sexual responsibility - that's not rape either.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:00 AM
1

They removed the only requirement for evidence, amounts to the same thing.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 03:41 AM
1

Still need evidence it was non-consensual Where does it say that? The only change in evidence is that they no longer require evidence of physical resistance Which means you have gone from requiring some evidence to none. Just a small change, I think not.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 03:39 AM
0

Well in the absence of any other evidence, it's natural to define physical evidence in terms of resistance, i.e. physical evidence of non consent.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 02:29 AM
1

But for example, what if the perpetrator confesses to authorities Well that sounds a lot like a guilty plea in which case a criminal trial does not occur. or to other credible people who are witnesses? Wouldn't that be sufficient evidence too? Last time I checked independent witnesses accounts are evidence, yes.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:35 AM
1

I agree, it's hard for me to fathom how a suspect could be safely convicted, when there is no evidence...Can you think of a way? No, and it should not be possible, unless you want a legal system comparable to North Korea.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:31 AM
2

You're really trying to separate the family court from feminists?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 11:52 PM
0

Yet the effect is to remove the need for any evidence in any case, to account for a rare fringe scenario.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 11:50 PM
0

Where did the law say a video tape is required?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:06 PM
1

the false accusations Can anyone find an equivalent article from this paper where they say a man was falsely accused just because he was acquitted?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:58 PM
3

Yeah but the media doesn't. Thats the point of this submission.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:56 PM
2

By allowing people (I.e. Men) to be convicted without evidence? That a big step back to the dark ages. They aren't just changing the definition of rape - they are fundamentally altering the level of evidence required to convict. Evidence of physical resistance was really just a shorthand way of requiring any physical evidence to start with. People who deny this are disingenuous trolls who try and undermine this sub, and have a history of doing so.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:50 PM
2

I think you mean "evidence requirement".
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:43 PM
1

This.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:42 PM
0

Or we could just do the sensible thing and require evidence for criminal convictions. As crazy as that sounds.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:42 PM
1

Sexual assault survivors in Maryland don't have to prove they physically fought their attackers to establish that a crime occurred These are weasel words. It's not about them having to prove evidence of physical resistance - it's about proving anything at all. It's not about replacing one kind of evidence with another, it's about removing the need for evidence. Leading to cases like this https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/jonathan-montgomery-wrongly-imprisoned-in-va/2012/11/13/845e49ac-2dca…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:39 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:45 PM
1

Errr no. Complainant=accuser.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:13 PM
3

ADHD is a classic case of society creating a "mental illness" to mask the affect of social policies, such as the treatment of boys at school. Look at the rates of ADHD in france compared to america (two genetically similar groups of people) too see how laughable it is.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 09:15 PM
4

It's very sad. Korea is also very family focused culture...maybe show them the destruction to families in the west as the result of feminism...children will be harmed.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 09:13 PM
1

Correct, that is why they are almost referred to as the "complainant" not a "witness", at least where I am from.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 09:01 PM
1

said by a witness As accuser isn't a witness, they are an accuser, so you are literally saying I was correct.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:40 PM
12

The NYPD dropped the charges after video surveillance from Pace showed no evidence of stalking I take it that's a cute way of saying it was a false accusation.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:11 PM
1

That doesn't change the fact that testimony is literally evidence Nope, that's called an accusation. Evidence is facts that can prove that an accusation is true, the most important of which is that a crime did in fact occur.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:07 PM
1

Feminists doesn't care about women, they are just exploiting them in a big power grab.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:20 PM
3

Virtually every rape case falls into this category. Try and find a case involving actual evidence...I would say less than 10% based on my own observations.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:58 AM
24

And this: “One man I spoke to recently had spent $40,000 in the Family Court getting a DNA test ordered,” Owen says. “It was found he was not the father of the child in question. The court ordered that all government departments were to be informed and remove the man as the father. Several months later the mother went back to the CSA, re-registered the case and the CSA started forcibly collecting from him again. Having spent all of his money fighting the initial case, he lacks the funds to fight…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:57 PM
1

Yawn.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 07:39 PM
-5

Get this shitpost outta there. No one gives a shit.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:12 AM
6

"I will never work with children again. I will never put myself in that position of vulnerability." Close, but you really need to extend that to ALL women. MGTOW is safety, and pretty fun to boot.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:11 AM
1

And how about divorce?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 08:03 PM
6

It is important in a free society Except we aren't talking about a free society, we are talking about Britain.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:54 AM
5

Legends.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 09:11 PM
17

Ultra conservative Christian politicians dark secret: gay sex and cross dressing. Male feminist white knights dark secret: rapists. Script writes itself.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 08:52 PM
3

Men aren't people silly.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 12:16 PM
4

MGTOW
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:33 AM
1

Sad this is spreading to Asia. Although they say Singapore is the most Westernized city in Asia.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:05 PM
2

Yet ends with a shoutout to the misandristic 1800RESPECT line that will not help male victims of domestic violence. Way to go Miranda!
/r/MensRights12/04/17 08:42 PM
1

Average time to draft a divorce application: 2 months.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 11:45 AM
5

Translation: we disagree with the ideas in the movie therefore we want to suppress awareness and discussion of it on campus.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 11:35 AM

In a written reply, the wife said that she and her husband decided to live separately, while agreeing to continue fertility treatment. She claimed that she submitted a document with his signature on his behalf as the transplantation surgery was decided suddenly. Was it Kissinger who once said that no-one lies like the Japanese?
/r/MensRights12/04/17 11:01 AM
1

One of many, many fathers who face this kind of treatment.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 10:59 AM
13

What amazes me is that they want to get married at all.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 02:55 AM
7

He's obviously no genius....he got married! ba dum tshh
/r/MensRights11/04/17 09:51 PM
8

They could not immediately return to their father Translation: we're still going to fight through hell and high water to ensure a father never gets custody over a mother, or even basic visitation rights. We're the family court, that's what we do!
/r/MensRights11/04/17 05:30 PM
1

Nope, you're the strawman. I said they can walk free, which is exactly what non-mandatory means.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 05:21 PM
1

Op, I couldn't find anything that said "and pedophiles/child molesters walk free". Thanks for playing "fearmonger with pedo hysteria". Check the list of mandatory sentences - I don't think you will find child molestation there. Did you even read the article?
/r/MensRights11/04/17 11:28 AM
11

Don't have kids -- the courts will rape you.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:29 AM
2

Student equality campaigners say all-male teams should not be allowed Otherwise known as the handicap rule.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:55 PM
6

IT ALREADY IS DECRIMINALIZED (FOR WOMEN). Yes - by official policy every western government does not subject mothers to criminal sanctions for child abuse. It's the most widespread un-prosecuted crime in the world.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:35 AM
3

Durham Crown Court heard it was only when discrepancies arose in a police interview with the then alleged rape victim that the truth emerged. You mean they actually questioned her before the trial? That's got to be a first. PC Elizabeth Graham, of Durham Police’s domestic abuse investigation team, said the force was very victim focused By putting the victim in a concrete cell and sexually assaulting him? That doesn't sound very victim focused at all!
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:07 AM
2

No, the boy. Although possibly also the daughter. But yes, giving these people anonymity is a joke, especially where the crime would have been common knowledge in the community (hard to hide a baby).
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:10 AM
2

Protect identity of child. It's quite normal in Australia. What isn't normal is withholding the judgement from publication, so we can't learn of the exact circumstance if each crime and the judge's reasoning.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:16 AM
4

And if you were wondering how a system already so stacked and biased against men could get any worse...
/r/MensRights09/04/17 08:34 PM
1

The entire rape system is to blame. When you allow convictions without any evidence whatsoever you are in a bad place.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 09:18 AM
28

It get's worse. Much worse. I have been investigating the treatment of female child rapists in Australia for some time. It appears there is deliberate censorship occurring - not only in hiding their names - but in even covering up the judgement. There is something in these judgement the vile legal system is trying to hide. Note that lots of male child sex offenders get name suppression - but less often, and the judgement are always published (with names redacted). Try and find a single female ch…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 09:05 AM
51

And she gets a bit over 3 years in jail - a bit over 2 months for each rape. Of a 12 year old child. Well, boy, which I guess is different.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 08:35 AM
0

This is grotesque.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:27 AM
6

Anything deemed profitable in a capitalist system will be vigorously pursued. Wait until feminism gets back on the wrong side of the profit equation and see what happens. They thought 50s patriarchy was bad? Imagine that but without a population of men who have been conditioned over hundreds of years to protect and venerate women. It won't be pretty. Just hope I live long enough to see it.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 08:27 AM
3

Paying women to make rape claims - what could possibly go wrong.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 07:19 PM
17

“They’re not understanding how important it is for the culture, for society, for the strength of the nation to have strong families.” They just don't get it. Of course we understand. It's just that we want to see the society that betrayed us burned to the ground.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 08:00 AM
2

Parameter: Number of women in life. Value: 0. Check.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 07:59 AM
32

the German student faced discrimination because he’s a male Could you see the Uni standing by and letting a male student target a female student for this kind of public harassment? Of course it was because of his gender, and hers.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 07:29 AM
1

Nice work!
/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:42 PM
5

Wow and maybe 0.0001% of women might benefit. Like the 0.0001% of men already there.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 11:06 AM
5

Scarily though her and News Corp's feminist agitation machine in Australia "news.com.au" are trying to bring kangaroo rape courts to Australian universities.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:58 AM
11

Well if I ever go to that dump of an English town I know where I'm not staying!
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:53 AM
7

Gender based persecution or apartheid. MGTOW is like basic self defence classes for men and boys.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 06:26 PM
9

What a cunt.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 06:49 AM
1

so at least listen to what we have to say I read that far and nope.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 10:34 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 01:47 AM
12

The whole concept of feminism was changing the rules, while expecting men to continue playing the game. It all goes belly up when men just start walking away, or going MGTOW. So you have this bizarre situation where women are celebrated for aspiring to career, marriage be damned, but men are expected to fulfill 19th century notions of chivalry.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 09:35 AM
4

Avoiding marriage is really the best way to avoid divorce rape Avoiding the de-facto marriage trap is not as straightforward as one might think (in certain countries).
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:51 AM
8

who had group sex with underage schoolboys Yeah I think raping children is more serious than doing a striptease.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:23 AM
14

My thoughts exactly. Mentor = white knight mangina "ally".
/r/MensRights01/04/17 01:53 AM
0

You should be banned from this sub for visiting r feminism.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 01:11 AM
4

We all would. And if anyone is wondering, it was true falsification - the video was slowed down to make it appear there was enough time to commit the crime, when there wasn't.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:25 AM
3

So why doesn’t Liz Truss sack her? Because she is also a nasty feminist who wants to prevent video evidence from being cross examined in rape show trials? Does she really think Saunders is the only one?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:24 AM
38

Wow. And the defence is generally prevented from strongly interrogating child accusers. She stressed only about 2 per cent of cases that made it to court were based on fabricated claims and said it was important to consider why it happened. I'm not really sure the "why" is that important to the innocent man in jail. Just wow.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:09 AM
5

That's actually pretty equal compared to your average pussy pass
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:03 AM
21

This is horrendous. Hopefully they are really just training the next generation of MRAs when they grow up and realize the abuse they suffered. Meanwhile, Victoria's justice minster thinks "there is a long way to go before people can feel safe in their homes". Brainwashing children is obviously more important than not having South African style crime levels.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 11:07 AM
25

This isn't suicide, it is murder, by any fair definition of the term. At least thanks to the internet his children will grow up and learn the truth.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:18 AM
1

You are using this case as evidence, therefore this case needs to prove what you are saying. Evidence of what? AFTER they got divorced They are not divorced. If you are trying to show some sort of injustice... I don't know what you are even on about.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:03 PM
0

The only person saying that they are married is the axe wielding maniac The law says they are married. Marriage is a legal contract. And I am not speaking about this case as much as the judges comments which seem to indicate a broader principal.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:50 PM
1

Nope, they are still married. Otherwise she wouldn't be his wife, would she?
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:42 PM
-6

Does that change the point the judge was making? Do married people have the "right" to pursue happiness with others while they are still married? If so, what does being married even mean?
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:30 PM
2

Let them eat each other.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 06:35 PM
2

I'm actually more surprised google didn't direct you to a men's domestic violence brainwashing program under a banner celebrating feminism.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 06:31 PM
1

What a shit post.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 04:54 PM
1

No. MRM is theory, TRP/MGTOW is practice. That's all.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 05:56 AM
1

Nothing backfires quite like feminism.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 05:54 AM
0

I did a little dance when Trump won.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:57 AM
1

a bill the same day preventing colleges from “including questions about criminal history” on admissions applications or withdrawing admissions offers if students admit to a conviction. Except being found "guilty" in a campus kangaroo court is not a criminal conviction. Tricky, eh?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:20 AM
-3

This is why I pay for YT Red.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:56 AM
9

There is only one thought any rational man should have: don't get married. You are stepping into the gas chamber.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:04 PM
2

Fault-based divorce has caused significant misery and costs in this case. Unlike modern divorce in adversarial courts with greedy lawyers that has led to widespread joy and happiness.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:35 PM
10

'It is our job, as prosecutors, to make objective charging decisions based on the evidence, rather than the discredited rape myths that skewed the system against victims.' Translation: we will prosecute with no evidence whatsoever on the myth that women don't lie about rape.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:23 AM
4

Not a single mention of anonymity as a reason why men don't want to donate. Weird.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:19 AM
12

I'm guessing if he changed in the girls locker room he would be a sex offender already.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 07:22 AM
36

But I thought women didn't lie about terrible things like this?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:20 PM
3

will now have to prove why they should be granted bail Translation: they will have to prove their innocence.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 12:29 PM
4

Stop with the misleading titles. THEY ALREADY CAN TESTIFY VIA VIDEO. This is about not being able to test their accusations in court before jury. It's much worse.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:15 PM
1

Why should we GRANT A FREE PASS to children who exploit other children? Because is normal for children to be attracted to other children. I mean, who else can be they attracted to? Adults? Younger children? People who actually exploit should be charged with something, but treating children like adult child pornographers is absurd.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:57 AM
1

Bet she would like to shoot Asian women too.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:44 AM
3

Bad title. They already can give evidence via video. This is about not being able to test that evidence in front of a jury which is much worse.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:14 PM
3

And if you are acquitted, that's not a finding of innocence.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:59 AM
1

The Justice Secretary said there had been no significant change to the conviction rate at these courts, but accused men had been more likely to plead guilty. Well if they just want convictions, why not abolish trials altogether and make people guilty on conviction? Probably so they can pretend this is different from the Holocaust.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 08:45 AM
1

While they rarely report on women who rape boys at all. Or about false accusations and the suicides that result. BBiaCed.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:10 PM
2

It doesn't fit. This is sub is heavily brigaded by concern trolls and disrupters, and the mod's are fucking shit. This story should have been deleted but here it is...
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:17 AM
1

"Equal before the law"
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:35 PM
14

I doubt calling it a bonus scares the taxman away.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:27 PM
2

But mah daddy was a dictator...
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:10 AM
1

more than 1,000 staffers at childcare centers in every state and territory in Australia stopped working at 3:20 p.m. on Wednesday So what did they do, kick all these toddlers out on the curb?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:15 AM
17

If a woman is comatose from drink or rigid with apprehension, or at best looks as if she’s lying back and thinking of England, do not pass go. She’s not that into you. So son, after you graduate with a PhD in female psychology, you will be ready to have sex.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:10 AM
2

I have half a mind to research that.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:39 AM
2

She ended up killing herself so she brought herself to justice. Which is good as a misandristic legal system never would.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:38 AM
11

police’s insistence that the ‘victim’ must be believed, however flawed their story Rape pigs are about as legitimate police officers as the Gestapo. The role of the CPS is to assess if there is a realistic prospect of conviction and if it is in the public interest to prosecute. Not whether the allegations are actually true. And the fact a "reasonable prospect" can mean as little as the chance a jury might simply "believe the victim". Yet they still claim to be acting in good faith. In this case,…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:24 AM
10

Other case http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/she-could-kill-again-says-husband-of-woman-who-drowned-their-children-20130407-2heww.html
/r/MensRights10/03/17 07:10 PM
-22

Bullshit, it's almost always boys. It's extremely rare for daughters to be killed by mothers.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 07:03 PM
-21

Link?
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:54 PM
-8

Google mother drowning sons over mother drowning daughters.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:52 PM
9

International women’s day is about celebrating the social, economic, cultural, and political achievements of women all around the world If by celebrate you mean whine bitterly about a non existent pay gap. I'm not sure I saw anything remotely celebraterly, unless you count celebrating how much their whining has stripped away rights from men.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 11:24 AM
3

2014
/r/MensRights10/03/17 11:18 AM
3

Spragg was ordered to hand herself in at Newport police station by 5pm today. A man would have been led away in handcuffs.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:48 PM
0

Read the article again fool.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:28 PM
0

Read the whole article fool.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 09:59 PM
1

Here comes the "Not all womens" brigade...
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:31 PM
1

Interesting choice of date to found the World Toilet Organization on, just 2 years after International Men's Day was founded on the same date.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:31 PM
4

International Men's Day (IMD) is an annual international event celebrated on 19 November. Inaugurated in 1992 on 7 February by Thomas Oaster,[1] the project was re-initialised in 1999 in Trinidad and Tobago So two years before toilet day started in 2001. Seems credible that malice was involved.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:19 PM
1

That's not how rape crucifixions work.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:14 PM
1

Bring back voluntary student unionism. Drain the swamp!
/r/MensRights08/03/17 11:21 AM
1

Been like it for years. Used to be fun to troll but whatever.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 11:18 AM
29

Wikipedia = Buzzfeed = Guardian = all the same. Look at the pages on conservative vs liberal newspapers: ALL the conservative papers are described as right wing/conservative in the initial description, none of the liberal ones are described as left wing. The whole thing is written from the perspective that left=correct and conservative=biased.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 11:16 AM
5

They certainly did! http://archive.is/mjjuL
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:47 PM
1

http://archive.is/F78ml
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:24 PM
5

It happened well before modern SJW protests - it has been developing for at least 3 decades and is based on girls being taught all men are oppressors in a patriarchy (and they are the victim of it), and that they need to complete with men at being men, yet at home and due to nature they get the idea women should be nurturers/mothers. Role/identity conflict leads to psychotic personality disorders, on top of the typical neurotic psychopathy women usually profess. Make sure you don't marry one!
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:15 PM
1

The first hipster MRA.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:05 PM
0

Google is only a few keystrokes away, a lot of stuff on this sub is based on context that regulars understand... https://www.buzzfeed.com/aliceworkman/white-ribbon-oath-shaming
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:56 PM
7

In a white country no less.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 12:22 PM
23

It just proves "child best interest" is just a pretext for steamrolling men's rights in favor of womens. Take men out of the equation and they steamroll children's rights as well.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 12:15 PM
1

Let's just meet in the middle and say white women raised in a Western society.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:17 AM
6

Holy crap, if you needed any harder, firmer proof that women are deeply neurotic, walking personality disorders than this, you won't find it. Who the fuck takes deep offence at a walk signal??
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:50 PM
5

Could you point your finger anonymously to get people lynched? Because that's where campus rape trials are heading....you won't even be able to know who your accuser is let alone question them (which is already blocked).
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:49 PM
3

And federal politicians trying to help put direct pressure on the government to change laws...this has been boiling on for a while...just a matter of time.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:47 PM
2

You know there's a sub for that right?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:04 AM
3

It's interesting woman can adopt out babies and avoid paying child support, yet men can't terminate their own obligations, even if they never really knew the mother or baby. One night stands do happen.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:55 PM
1

Other comments have it
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:11 PM
2

The point is he is being demonized for merely wanting it, women are celebrated for exercising their "choice".
/r/MensRights05/03/17 11:17 AM
1

Yet according to feminists abortion is just a safe medical procedure and it's childbirth that risks death.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 11:01 AM
12

God the comments on that page are insane. I mean I knew Australian feminists were a bunch of evil harpies but this is crazy. They are really showing their true colors.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 10:58 AM

How is a man denied the right by law to ask a woman to get an abortion? Put that bloody strawman back up your cunt.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 10:50 AM
3

Depends if you plead "no contest" or not.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 06:54 AM

Wow look at the comments on the gofundme page. The amount of hatred from all these feminists towards a separated father is incredible. But then this: Michelle Owen I am the mother of Alf and I'm disgusted with the nasty comment no matter if he hasn't seen the boys for so long he is still Ryan's father and possibly Eli's as well and as far as I'm concerned I am their grandmother as well you all should be ashamed with yourselves
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:06 AM
15

THE father of two young boys who were allegedly dumped in the Murray River What a strange word to use to describe holding a child's head under water until they drown. http://archive.is/URCFh I wonder why they don't put the journos name on these articles...I wonder which news.com.au feminist was behind it.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:01 AM
6

Google part of the url you can bypass...also http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4281280/Girlfriend-Bryce-Cartwright-paid-50-000-abortion.html
/r/MensRights05/03/17 12:11 AM
38

Arguably legal rape trials are already at that point. The accused basically has to prove the accuser is lying or raise serious credibility issues. Clearly evidence is not required to confirm an accusation or prove the charges - juries and judges are simply free to "believe the victim".
/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:46 PM
3

The real backfire is not being able to find a husband at all.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:39 PM
2

That is VERY VERY drunk, damn near alchohol poisoning Well if that's true they should say that, not about a limit for driving a vehicle.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:36 PM
18

Came here to say that. I love the way they use the term "legal limit" without saying for what, and why it is even relevant. It's like they think it's a general limit for any kind of conscious behavior.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 07:50 PM
2

Ice addict daughters - can't take out an AVO against them, can't kill them. And now a little boy is dead.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 01:55 PM
2

You're response to this is weird. The grandmother had an AVO out on the daughter. She was raising the grandkids. She told the government she didn't want the adult daughter at the house, they told her too bad. What angle are you trying to play at?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 01:13 PM
10

*** UNBELIEVABLE *** The woman had an AVO taken out against her in May 2016 (which was still in force) - BUT THE GOVERNMENT BROKE THE LAW AND THE AVO BY SENDING HER TO THE HOME THE AVO BANNED HER FROM BEING NEAR AND TOLD THE PARENT TO "put up with her daughter living there". http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/grandparents-warned-authorities-about-mother-before-moama-drowning-tragedy-lawyers/ar-AAnKiDZ?li=AA4RE4&ocid=spartandhp Imagine if the government send a violent father back to a home i…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 11:29 AM
3

The best revenge is to run as an independent and split the vote.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:24 PM
2

Post this on thredpill or something, doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:59 PM
1

If I was a man in Spain, short of escaping the country, I would stay as far away from women as humanly possible at all times.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 12:41 PM
12

Meanwhile physics questions are being replaced by general knowledge questions in....physics class. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/education/feminised-physics-a-formula-for-failure-says-michelle-simmons/news-story/b26b46725b1d0a97e57585aabea20f37
/r/MensRights01/03/17 12:37 PM
3

It already had that affect years ago when anonymity was dropped for new donors. This is about kicking donors from decades ago in the teeth.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 12:30 PM
6

then she'd be fined a large sum. Maybe after a bajillion warnings and slaps on the wrist. If you had 20 kids you never expected to see turning up on your doorstep when you were promised it could never happen...he'll be spending half his life in court trying to prosecute his own children. Maybe he has a family who he wants to protect from the knowledge of all these "half siblings" etc. Privacy is an important right in itself, regardless of who contacts you.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:34 AM
26

And think of the lengths the government goes to prevent fathers from seeing their children after divorce...now all of a sudden knowing your father is important.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 08:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter