TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NaDius147 Archive

View 11 posts and 125 comments by NaDius147 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm not to big on them. I followed Sarah Dawn Moore for a while but it turned out she was plagiarising from other content creators such as "mynonleatherlife". She also seemed to be lying about her coaching experience, claiming she had 10 years when she had basically none. You can read her facebook reviews and see how negative they are. Now she has shifted into investing under Sarah Dawn Investing, and she teaches quite questionable approaches to investing, which essentially just boil down to "go…
/r/seduction21/12/25 03:09 PM
4

Women hate men even if their personalities make them easier partners than other women.
/r/BlackPillScience31/07/25 08:53 AM
3

You put less effort into that response than women do into their personalities.
/r/BlackPillScience31/07/25 08:04 AM
1

And women don't put effort into their character or personality.
/r/BlackPillScience31/07/25 05:55 AM
1

Repulsed by their personalities, yet the vast majority of lower class men are paired up with women. Lesbians do have the problem of highest divorce rates, high DV rates and high rates of sexless relationships/marriages. The point is women are attracted to women, sexually speaking. They just get pulled much more towards men for non-sexual reasons.
/r/BlackPillScience31/07/25 05:51 AM
3

I don't think its too overly complicated. Men are ugly, but more reasonable and make better partners. Women, beautiful but ugly on the inside and less pleasant to be around. This is why lesbian relationships are the most unstable. Nature is all about trade-offs. Women got beauty at the expense of character. Women use "you're acting sassy and feminine" to put down men. "OMG, you're acting like me". This is why when women divorce "awful men", they run to social media to make reels bashing men, and…
/r/BlackPillScience31/07/25 05:32 AM
1

Many women say this is proof that sexuality isn't a choice, yet they overlook what the findings actually suggest: that women are not naturally sexually attracted to men. If anything, their innate orientation appears to lean toward other women. So if women continue to form relationships with men despite a lack of sexual attraction, it's not biology pulling them toward men; it's social, emotional, or practical factors pushing them in that direction. These could include things like cultural norms, …
/r/BlackPillScience31/07/25 05:07 AM
3

There is some truth and lies in this. Something like Men between ages 25-50 are 90% employed compared with 75% of women. Men also work longer hours. More dangerous jobs. And generally more vital jobs for the economy and society at large. More women go to education but women are propped up at the expense of Men. Women also dominate humanities while men dominate traditional stem subjects. Women don't pay off their debts and Men end up being burdened by this as Men are net providers to the welfare …
/r/MensRights21/12/23 04:04 PM
1

Being a man hating a hole isn't a position. Like I said, that hypothetical deserves nothing but mockery. It's only thr level of "but black people's IQ makes them to stupid to handle the responsibilities that come with being a first class citizen.".
/r/MensRights19/12/23 12:26 AM
1

OP was asking for arguments for their case. And you presented a hypothetical of someone being a completely obtuse a hole. The only way to converse with someone who says that is to mock them or ignore them. No sane person talks about not fighting for men's rights because the only way to do so is via castration of men. That's pure misandry.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 12:22 AM
1

This isn't isn't slippery slope. You just using argumentum absurdum. Black on black crime is caused by social, economic and educational factors. Same with all social issues. What are men prepared to do? Well first theyre prepared to acknowledge it instead of denying it like women. You can't find a solution without doing the theory. And you lying about a problem because you think the solution might be bad, just showd you don't care about the problem. You're brain going towards castration when thi…
/r/MensRights18/12/23 08:57 AM
4

I don't think reddit allows me to do so. Sarahdawnmoore and it will be on her Instagram or Facebook.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 10:57 PM
1

Women literally laugh at news stories of men getting their dicks cutoff(Sharon Osbourne) on national TV. Then they give back handed apologies where they can't contain their laughter and get away with it. Personally something like that has no effect to me in large part becoz there is so much misandrist crap everywhere that u just become used to it.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 08:09 AM
6

Don't even bother. A lot of women have a high level of disdain or disregard for many and plenty others straight up hate men. The standard for labelling men misogynist is much lower than the standard for labelling women misandrists. A lot of women are basically hypocrites and if they applied their standards consistently, you'd find that a majority of women hold some belief that would can be classified as misandrist. Threads and discussion pages centered around women's issues show how stubborn and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/23 08:08 AM
1

Thats just conjecture. But even then, the reporting rate doesnt effect the data that was posted. The data is of those who were raped, what percentage suffered PTSD. Thats not going to change becoz u more ppl reported. Do you not trust women when they tell u what they find worse? Does your personal opinion have to be the general rule for everyone? You need to be more open minded.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 10:44 AM
2

Never said that. A lot of women behaving like children is rampant and i showed an example of tradcons twisting conservatism to defend acting like children. Thats the point.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 09:56 PM
3

No it all hinges on that bible verse. its shows that they dont want self reflection and want to act like children but be taken seriously everytime by a man who tirelessly puts up with it.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 09:44 PM
1

No im generalizing the behaviour of tradcons using several tradcons. Now goawayyyyydog.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 09:08 PM
3

Nice obfuscation. Pretend the point isnt about women claiming they r different to modern women whilst exuding the exact behaviour as they r try claim they r different.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 08:54 PM
2

4 pics but theyre in reverse order by mistake.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 08:19 PM
1

Is that last study u linked abt the relationship example u mentioned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/20 10:58 AM
1

What does that mean "toxic masculinity literally means gender roles can hurt men too, okay."? I thought it meant certain forms of masculinity are toxic and harmful. What u said was vague and unclear. If men are harmed by certain expectations it doesnt necessarily mean its due to masculinity or toxic forms of it. Masculinity isnt bad at all. And often what ppl denote as toxic masculinity is really sociopathy or psychopathy. Men kill themselves becoz of real things like economic struggle, drug abu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 05:13 PM
1

What a load of incoherent jargon. Majority of criminals are raised from single mothers in a society where we glorify single mother hood. Saying we need both parents, as opposed to saying father's are important, won't address the problem.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 01:00 AM
1

Again, that wont address the fact the fathers are demonized and mothers are glorified and excused of everything. Promoting the value of men will show people that we should promote mothers without father's. What does it.mean to promote both parents when one parent is overwhelmingly privileged and helped in this instance?
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:50 AM
1

Women are heavily promotes at the expense of men. So we should promote the value of men.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:48 AM
5

Bad father >= to a bad mother who poisons the mind of the child for self serving reasons.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:46 AM
0

Women don't attempt more. Most attempts by women are actually just self harms aka false positives.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 04:48 PM
3

'Men are defective women' - they're taller, stronger, smarter and bigger brained.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 08:55 AM
1

Women do get too much credit for their cleanliness but historically they have been the generally more hygienic gender. However, I think this is largely social. On construction, warehouse sites etc, where the job is dirty and physical, the toilets are also worse than most places. But that is explained by that lifestyle around the place. I couldn't imagine how dirty the toilets on a female construction site would be. But women predominantly do office, retail, cleaning, care, service providing etc …
/r/MGTOW24/11/19 11:13 PM
12

point still stands. men need to spend more to meet caloric requirements on average.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 12:07 AM
1

Rip her vagina out. She is a monster.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 12:03 AM
1

You're missing the point. I also don't think you know what you're talking about. Your argument is essentially - if they were wrong, someone important would have told me and it would be established science. I'm telling you that the data on temp and CO2 levels doesn't show the causal relationship that you would expect. What is there to peer review? Just look at the charts, the ones agreed upon by the science community, and you will see that CO2 rise lags temp rise. There is nothing to peer review.…
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:20 PM
1

I'm saying the agreed upon data regarding temps, the data which mainstream science uses and which no one disputes, shows what I said. There is noise, but any dissent is drowned out and ignored.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 09:00 AM
1

The historic temp and CO2 data, is just data. Data. It doesn't need peer reviewing. And same with the plateau of temp rise. It's the data that everyone agrees on.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 07:14 PM
2

It really isn't. Climate predictions have been wrong and temp rise has hit a plateau since 2000s. CO2 levels throughout history don't even correlate with temps in a way that is in accordance with climate change theory.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 01:10 PM
5

Nice kumbaya speech. In the real world, prejudice and injustice exists and no amount of idealistic wishy washy inclusiveness will fix it.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 08:59 AM
1

It's ppl who hv thought patterns like those in ur reply, that destroy mens rights and propagate feminism. . Trump is "so bad", yet u can't criticise him without strawmanning.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 10:14 PM
2

You're a mensrights member but u sound like a guy who gets his perspective from CNN.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 10:05 PM
5

What do prior republican admins have to do with Trump? All prior admins both dem and rep are opposed to trump fundamentally hence why Romney and Bush and others didnt like Trump. So there was no grave digging. Point is the apparatus that existed and benefit both Bush and Obama is being used to stop trump even if what he does benefits the country, like for example - infrastructure spending. The Fed is against Trump. Their rate hikes in 2018 undid a lot of the work Trump did in his trade war with …
/r/MensRights20/11/19 07:44 PM
3

You believe the climate change myth? You know it's the same people lying to u about womens oppression, that are lying about climate change?
/r/MensRights20/11/19 07:21 PM
4

Now ur not even making an argument to any of my points, just repeating the same statements but doubling down with insane blood thirsty language.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:40 PM
2

great insight. Now back to sleep.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:14 PM
-4

That's not what I mean. I mean that the apparatus of government is being used against him for partisan reasons. He has traitors that want to see the country fail just to get rid of Trump. When trump replaces these traitors, he will be able to really implement his policies. For example infrastructure spending - this is necessary and is good for the economy but Dems don't want to see Trump succeed. Same with the wall.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:13 PM
-2

In what way? He can't come into power and do everything he wants given that the whole system is filled with anti trump people on both sides. 40+ years of liberalism can't go away just like that. Trump is building the foundation. And his hands are slowly getting untied, and he will only get more power to change things.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:00 PM
2

That's kinda sad that they focused on the sex bit. To improve mens lives, you need to focus on self improvement. However, ironically, self improvement is also the only thing that increases your chance of sex with women. Women don't want a man who's "thing" is that he is into women or focused on getting women. They want a man who is interested in things and is competent.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 05:58 PM
10

It's common for women to say looking after a baby is the hardest job in the world, and that they'd rather sit in an office from 9 to 5. That's becoz women tend to do those kinds of jobs. You never hear a woman say, "I'd rather be at work making houses or loading lorries, than at home looking after a baby". They're so ignorant that they think our whole society is maintained from the kind of office jobs women do. They ignore all the hard and dangerous manual labour that is done by men.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 04:38 PM
-4

So r u leftist or anti trump? Why the Trump hate? He is the anathema to modern liberalism. He will become stronger in his second term.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 04:21 PM
8

I don't know the stance of MRs towards Trump, but this wouldn't have been possible without his administration. Trump's main enemy is the liberals both in term of the economic and financial model of neo liberalism and the liberal values that go with it. Trump is the roll back of modern liberalism.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 04:19 PM
-2

except women blow fuses over nothing. Women r more likely to hit men than vice versa. think of shows where the woman slaps a guy becoz she is mad, but men can't even hit a woman in self defence.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 08:59 AM
1

My depression was a result of bad experiences in life. Often depression does have a cause and a cure. Your case is not the majority of cases.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 08:48 PM
2

Why? No virtue in having it easier.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 08:44 PM
3

Men aren't praised for the value they bring and create. Instead it's just ignored and down played. Like blue collar jobs, manufacturing and construction industries which hold society together and are the only real source of economic growth, but are either often ignored or downplayed as job sectors for those who couldn't get on with school. Yet being a stay at home mom is equated with manual labour jobs. Teachers are never paid enough. Typing up spreadsheets apparently adds more value to the econ…
/r/MensRights09/09/19 06:40 PM
1

Ive heard someone describe this as men being in the glass cellar. You often hear feminists complain about the glass ceiling that prevents them from progressing but they ignore the glass cellar where a lot of men have it much harder than most women.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 08:57 PM
1

no shit.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:52 PM
1

yet u still haven't explained anything regarding the point. now ur whining like a little girl. its like ur trying to compensate for the fact that ur wrong and now look silly. keep going buddy. 'completely irrelavant'? plz point me to that.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:45 PM
1

here's a quote of ur response after I made my point. "Now you’re just completely shifting the goal posts in a really bizarre way. Also imagine using the word “ur” on reddit." u dodged the point by attacking my use of 'ur'. and u claimed I was shifting the goals posts so as to not have to address my point.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:33 PM
0

U mean when i accused u of derailing so u copied me and accused me of derailing and now ur copying me again by saying "remember when"? thats all u seem to be able to do. U still haven't given a response to my point on the actual subject of the topic.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:59 PM
1

'imagine using the word "ur" on reddit[a highly informal internet discussion forum where txt speech makes total sense]." uve got no response + ur attacking txt speech. remember when I said about how ur trying to derail the debate. ur really reaching now buddy.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 08:00 AM
1

women often get more custody for being women, and this is does happen in terms of sole custody too. ur derailing from the actual point of the original post.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 05:06 PM
1

no u said dads often just walk out and I said that is only in epidemic high crime black areas. That fact were talking about men and not parents in general shows that u understand differences matter. so stop playing that lame shit.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 02:18 PM
1

odd response from u. don't really know what that means. but I'm telling u, the fatherlessness in blacks is much greater(from statistics) and is overwhelmingly a result of them being absent for whatever reason. This is not the case with white father's.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 01:59 PM
5

not true. among whites, dad rarely walks out.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:06 PM
5

That's makes no sense. Majority of rape victims r men.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:04 PM
1

This is a great graphic and could be used better by encompassing more stats and more general measures of well being. That would really illustrate the point.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:04 PM
1

He's going out of his way to do this. He was speaking at the UN way before these new levels of climate hysteria begun. He's fighting to be at the front of the liberal insanity.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 01:32 PM
0

Leo is a loser who speaks self righteously about climate change and believes in all the liberal feminist multicultural dogma.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 12:03 PM
1

or you could secretly video record ur class(there's apps that allow u to do this) like the ones on youtube that have gone viral and upload it, and wait for it to hopefully go viral.
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/19 11:19 PM
3

compare hollywood actors like Pitt, Cooper, Dicaprio, Clooney, Gosling from when they were young to when they were in their 30s or 40s. They have a more mature look rather than a boyish fresh faced look. Men also have more collagen in their skin than women and they don't abuse their skin with make up. Also, men go through a lot more character building experiences in life. They can really on the sexual value. A man who survives to 30 is a much better person than a woman who makes it to 30 in a si…
/r/MGTOW05/08/19 09:35 PM
92

what's also funny is women who look like her and pretend their bodies are a result of hard work, when all she did was eat less to lose some weight. compare that to a guy who is lean and muscular with abs who had to spend years working out, multiple days a week, maintaining a surplus of calories, followed by weight cutting to get his body.
/r/MGTOW05/08/19 09:05 PM
8

tell her to stop being a diva and to stop cuntsplaining whenever she argues. But there's not a lot of context here. r u a uni student in sociology or something? and is she just telling u to shut up becoz she knows your like the only anti feminist who speaks up? But if the debate starts off with the accepted premise that women are oppressed and harassed by men, I don't see the point in being there if u don't have to. It like me going to science class to question evolution or global warming when t…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/19 08:42 PM
2

Do you have links or know how I could find such data?
/r/MensRights04/08/19 01:42 PM
1

Enjoying girlfriends strapon = being humiliated. He needs feminism so he feels better about being humiliated.
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 11:29 AM
8

I think you're just pretending to be stupid.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 10:42 PM
6

Again, point to me where I did any of that? US suicide rate has doubled over the post war period. The suicide rate is already very high. It was an epidemic in pre war era becoz times were tough back then. It may have decreased at times but it's remained at a high level. By your logic, TB wasn't an epidemic in 1890 becoz in 1800 it was higher. Suicide rates weren't ok in more violent times and they still aren't now.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 10:23 PM
6

Biggest killer amongst young to middle aged men. Keep lying to yourself.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 10:13 PM
9

I'm gonna repost my response to you. And I have one question. How on earth does your lame repackaged comment address anything I said? Try reading carefully this time. 'Your lame straw man aside, the only one here bitching is you. In response to someone correctly identifying that female suicide, as an issue, is often brought up to downplay the importance of male suicide epidemic, I explained the differences between the two issues. Also, saying men commit more suicide becoz they bear the burdens o…
/r/MensRights03/08/19 10:12 PM
7

Your lame straw man aside, the only one here bitching is you. In response to someone correctly identifying that female suicide, as an issue, is often brought up to downplay the importance of male suicide epidemic, I explained the differences between the two issues. Also, saying men commit more suicide becoz they bear the burdens of society and are demonised at the same time, isn't blaming anyone. It's called identifying the problem. And it's what an honest person does. I'm sorry if the idea of w…
/r/MensRights03/08/19 10:05 PM
9

Men kill themselves becoz they can no longer take the constant grinding down they receive in society combined with being demonized and made to feel worthless. Women attempt suicide as a cry for help and attention. Women are insulated from the troubles of life and receive social and emotional safety nets. Problem is, in the real world, you can only block out so much and be coddled so much, and so when a woman is faced with a minor hardship or isn't getting as much attention as she'd like or is us…
/r/MensRights03/08/19 05:59 PM
1

'the situation was more complicated'. sounds like ur justifying the founders of America raping young girls(which mohammed did) and owning slaves. the founding fathers lived hundreds of years after mohammed. I could just as Well say the situation in mohammeds time was more complicated.
/r/MGTOW30/07/19 07:09 PM
1

"nothing is so necessary for a man as the company of intelligent women" - Leo Tolstoy.
/r/MGTOW27/07/19 10:42 PM
2

'with a knife against your throat'. in other words, don't do anything till it's too late.
/r/MGTOW27/07/19 10:38 PM
3

the founding fathers owned slaves and had sex with 10 year olds.
/r/MGTOW27/07/19 10:31 PM
6

above 2.5 is still way higher than 1.9.
/r/MGTOW27/07/19 10:29 PM
3

I think u mean well but ur wrong in saying that men get called incel for hating women. Incel is just 'u cat get laid' 2.0. I don't think a lot of MGTOW hate women. They r just understandably angry and vent the anger in unproductive ways. The stuff I see on MGTOW threads isn't any near the level of the radfem and even liberal fem stuff of 'kill all men', and is often provides with some insight rather than the lazy 'a guy said X on a dating site, all men suck'.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 10:14 PM
2

Saying 'soy boy' =/ incel. All u just said was full of generalisations, strawmans and hyperbole. A lot of ppl agreed with the OP, and a lot of others just said that whilst crying is okay, men don't need to be coddled and feminised. No one directly said crying is bad. There is a balance. Feminists r demonising men. this has emotional effects on men but feminists claim the solution is men need to cry. Actually, it doesn't matter how much men cry, so long as they r demonized and victims of a system…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 10:08 PM
-1

Im sure this is a joke. But there r relationships like that. And that kind of woman is toxic. but that is a weak man. Make that bitch shut up and put her in her place.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 10:44 PM
5

tell that to the 20 million russian soldiers who died to protect their motherland.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:06 PM
1

remember that media is controlled by liberals. a lot of what u see is insane shit that a lot of commonfolk don't agree with. also, take a stoic approach. geting pissed off and upset is perfectly understandable but Y shud it piss u off or upset u? ppl can believe insanity, and say and spread insane ideas. a cooky religious person can stand on a street corner, insult gays, scientists, and black ppl. he will probly get attacked but he is still exercising his bodily autonomy. that shouldn't anger u.…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 07:21 PM
1

or masturbate. then think again.
/r/MGTOW22/07/19 07:07 PM
3

I see a lot of toxic stuff reposted here from Feminist subbredits.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 09:32 PM
-3

It's human nature to protect women and even hold them to a lesser standard and go a bit easy on them simply because they r the fairer beautiful sex. That would seem would seem like a pretty effective evolutionary model for ensuring species survival. And I don't see anything wrong with this, just as long as we keep ourselves checked and not coddle women and hold them to too little a standard, or no standard at all.
/r/MGTOW21/07/19 09:14 PM
2

i mean the old show, sorry. i haven't watched any seasons of this show.
/r/MGTOW21/07/19 07:12 PM
6

is it really? I was thinking about watching the show. I know the old series was good. might just rewatch that.
/r/MGTOW21/07/19 05:27 PM
9

post the picture of the victim but not the perpetrators?
/r/MGTOW21/07/19 05:26 PM
1

No they didn't that's one exception. I'm saying that rather than putting the burden of the bail out money on the ppl. They could have put a tax plan that would make the rich pay the debt off. instead it's part of government debt which ppls taxes go towards. Ur ignoring my point. The thing that lead to the crisis happened under Labour's watch. I don't think u get what it means to bail out the banks. They didn't have to bail them out. They could have nationalised all the ones that failed and any b…
/r/MensRights21/07/19 05:19 PM
0

Ur logic is, bail out the ppl who screwed u over so they don't screw u even more. Labour oversaw the practises that lead to the crisis. They could have nationalised the banks and taxed the rich and use from from that. But they instead covered the banks asses.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:55 PM
1

So workers lost jobs and mortgages after Labour bailed out the banks, but somehow it was for their own benefit. I didn't know being a labour voter made u insane.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:35 PM
2

Labour bailed out the banks leaving many workers broke and jobless. The root of the problem is entirely a Labour problem.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:29 PM
0

Corbyn is one man. Labour is a party. Corbyn doesn't even bring ppl who support him and his policies to power. He appoints Blairites to his cabinet. Corbyn being in power for a few years but not actually PM doesn't change the real history of Labour.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:24 PM
2

British politics is just as two sided and bureaucratic. Labour waged the wars of the 21st CE. They supported colonization of India. They supported Corporatism of the late 20th CE.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:21 PM
2

and labour don't?
/r/MensRights21/07/19 02:53 PM
2

i meant it sarcastically. pro free market ppl will justify a lot of insane outcomes of capitalism so long as it's a result of the free market and government isn't involved. I agree with you. Things like feminism and IDpol were and are funded by super rich capitalist elites. First capitalism supported wars that killed millions of men. Now it supports social castration and demonisation of men globally as a way of waging psychological warfare. A more cunning tool than world wars.
/r/MGTOW21/07/19 01:32 PM
1

that was one example. I'm talking about health in general. stop being so pedantic.
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 08:19 PM
1

i mention OA once as an example in my first post.
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 08:18 PM
1

health in general. not just OA. athletes are twice as likely to get it.
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 08:15 PM
1

running miles puts a lot of pressure on ur knees but the benefits r very little. Also, I said 5 miles a day not a week.
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 07:56 PM
1

they aren't surviving. these r privileged women who have more honourable options available to them.
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 06:42 PM
-1

feminism with a minus sign.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 04:47 PM
2

but that's just the otherside of the extreme end of the spectrum. doesn't refute my point. overworking is bad. one can build muscle, but don't need to live the obsessive life of a typical body builder.
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 03:47 PM
9

nothing wrong with pointing out who really has it tougher in response to someone crying about oppressed women.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:41 PM
2

it still takes a pathetic woman to engage in that. and I pity any woman who does. woman aren't very good companions if they can't be expected to recognise sad desperate behaviour in men and not facilitate it. I would expect that from anybody man or woman.
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 01:40 PM
5

overworking the body is a thing. and being a body builder is unnecessary for longevity and is actually a detriment. work out and build muscle but don't over do it and don't become a marathon runner who does daily 5 mile runs for exercise. that will destroy your body. i think sports athletes r twice as likely to develop osteoarthritis. and also, maintain good posture.
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 12:48 PM
3

only sad loser women wud take pride in making money like that.
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 11:30 AM
8

its just the free market working it's magic. nothing to complain about.
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 11:27 AM
2

Unfortunately we are still in the penultimate phase. Hard times are only just being created now but the worst is yet to come.
/r/MGTOW17/07/19 01:33 PM
1

assuming a mens rights group = white supremacy is kind of dumb. but I'd go as far as to say ur sister is a insecure man hating dyke.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 09:32 AM
0

it's txt speech. im on reddit, an informal forum for unprofessional ppl. y do I need correct grammar?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:18 AM
3

ur inclined to believe her? in that case I don't hv much constructive to say to u. what u posted by ur sister is clearly an insane bigoted feminist opinion. what if I said to u 'i think ur a psychotic Nazi who hates jews. now defend urself?' clearly her take is ridiculous and no one shud engage with that.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:39 PM
1

could u explain? I only joined this thread a few weeks ago so don't really know the history.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:11 PM
3

I know. but the wider point is that bagspreading is a thing women do even in crowded situations. when manspreading is brought up, examples of men sitting alone in uncrowded places is always used. and even then, a women could still just ask a man to give her a little more space if it were actually causing an issue.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:12 PM
2

still rude to have a bag up when it's crowded.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:15 AM
2

But if trying to prove a negative was the crux of a rape case, then that would seem problematic. I don't think it is proving a negative when you honestly consider what rape is. And I feel many people in society don't do this. Also, I understand giving the man who was accused, the burden of proving consent was given as the only way to prove innocence is absurd. But I ask because people have been talking about this and holding the perspective I just mention. This article talks about how men accuse…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 11:08 PM
1

But in trying to convince the jury the interaction was non-consensual, you are trying to convince them of a negative - that something didn't happen.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:29 PM
1

I mean the UN is a long established organisation that has promoted the feminist agenda for quite some time. They already have global networks in place along with a lot of resources. This kind of report is kind of what they do. I think a place like reddit is good for just building low level networks first. I don't think writing reports like this will help. You need to aim at getting out knowledge in a clear effective way. Fact is, feminism isn't that popular. It's just that the liberals who have …
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:16 PM
1

I had a question about rape and the burden of proof. In the case of a woman reporting a rape, is it not that a woman being required to prove she was raped, is required to prove a negative - that consent wasn't given? Kind of like asking someone reporting a theft, to prove they didn't lend the car out.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 11:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter