TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Need_Food Archive

View 0 posts and 163 comments by Need_Food on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Who said it's resentment? Sounds like you're just overly sensitive. If the system was set up to enable men to do that, I have no doubt that plenty of them would. Really sounds like you are incapable of hearing things about women's bad behavior without trying to project imaginary issues onto the person pointing tnem out. The "women are wonderful effect" is strong with you.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:00 AM
2

It's not in my mind, but way to be disingenuous again. Yes, they'd rather take on debt, get married, then offload it onto a man. Women have a larger amount of personal debt, and make up a majority of the consumer spending. It's easy to blow money when you can offload the problem onto a man. Plenty? Girl there are only a couple dozen at most. Bother me, oh fuck off with your emotional shit again.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 09:32 PM
2

Access is not the same thing as utilizing that access. Damn I'd think with a college degree you could put that together yourself.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 09:24 PM
2

Who said I claimed women have more money? Jesus you love arguing in bad faith. It's about access to the sources of money. I'm not going to Google for you because clearly you haven't taken the five seconds to Google "scholarships for women" or "college prep for girls" to find the hundreds of thousands of results. You don't understand how you have it better? I mean, you're a feminist so that explains everything. The quote "to those who have everything, equality feels like oppression" was originall…
/r/MensRights21/08/25 09:21 PM
2

What's really wild is trying to pretend you have never heard of these programs when they are absolutely everywhere. I'd have so much money if I was a girl, it'd be nuts. It's funny how every woman ever tries to find a million reasons she is the exception to the rule no matter what. As soon as a general statement is issued, every bimbo with a phone comes out of the woodwork trying to tell men they're wrong because "I aM nOt lIKe ThAt"
/r/MensRights21/08/25 09:08 PM
3

And that has absolutely nothing to do with the actual issue OP is discussing.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:06 PM
5

See, that kind of emotional garbage... you're not a man, you're a child. I'm pointing out real structural issues and you're just mocking it. Keyboard warrior and real warrior. I just got out of the Marine Corps, and I currently run trainings and exercises for terrorism and other disasters. I've seen first hand the world of true building through the fire with other men and building something real...an experience you so obviously lack
/r/MensRights21/08/25 11:11 AM
4

Based on your behavior... I'd be hard pressed to call you a man. And since you lack the moral strength to argue honestly, I'd say you have no idea what it truly means to have real male friendships beyond drinking alcohol, staring at titties, and watching people on a screen throw a ball. You're self sedated and trying to drag others down with your weakness.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 10:57 AM
6

I guess you just skipped the entire part that you didn't want to hear and choose to be disingenuous about it... sure. I'll say it again since you selectively read... men bond by building and creating things bigger than themselves. Yeah you can have "fiends" you meet in passing or throw a ball with or something trivial like that. But unless you've actually done something intense and great together, those bonds don't satisfy the deepest need that enables true connection. A need and connection most…
/r/MensRights21/08/25 10:48 AM
7

What kind of a disingenuous comment is this? Male only spaces are literally illegal with very few exceptions such as the Freemasons. Men bond by building and creating things bigger than ourselves. And to accomplish that we have historically created institutions... Because institutions are required to move large quantities of resources and money to accomplish a goal. Since the beginning of time we have created professional societies, businesses, governments, militaries, charitable organizations, …
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:30 AM
4

"Men lonely...women most affected"
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:22 AM
2

Yeah feminism is as diverse as the Russian political system. Sure there might be some views that are different, but they all follow the party line. Just because something is complex doesn't mean it is good. Factually, you are full of shit. As many of the other commenters have pointed out in this section, the pay issue is not real. Rights, you already have more rights than most men. Historical restrictions, well we don't live in ancient historical times...So stop trying to use that as a rationale…
/r/MensRights21/08/25 02:53 AM
3

Lmfao how much feminist jargon can one person put in a comment. No it wasn't out of line, look at your initial assumption. You are assuming that these critiques are valid, that there is systematic inequality, and that the feminist position is inherently rational therefore any dismissal of that is out of line. You haven't even taken a second question your own bullshit. The real data doesn't support most feminist positions, if you want to talk about real data we can talk about that all day long. B…
/r/MensRights21/08/25 02:42 AM
2

Constructive criticism is, don't ever do that again. This is a blatant tactic of emotionally immature women to belittle men. Just figure out some sort of emotionally charged personal attack that indirectly shames his manhood or competence... And then walk away pretending that anyone who calls you out on that is inherently being rude themselves. The constructive criticism is...grow up.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 02:09 AM
2

There's literally no positive way I could have come across. Oh yes, don't have to be so rude about calling out your rudeness lmfao. Again, talk about some arrogance.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 02:03 AM
2

I can't tell you what your tone was? What kind of ridiculous arrogance is that. The level of narcissism it must take to completely dismiss other people's observations of you being a shit human being.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:57 AM
3

No it wasn't sarcasm at its finest, it was gynocentrism at its worst.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:38 AM
3

I'm observing your actions, I don't need to know everything about you to observe that you were being a dick and only doing that because of his gender and observations.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:35 AM
3

Jesus it's so blatantly obvious. The man was talking about his actual real experiences and observations and you just come in with all your childish arrogance and sarcastically dismiss him with the most absurd dismissive statement ... Ironically proving his point in the process
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:34 AM
1

Jesus it's so blatantly obvious. The man was talking about his actual real experiences and observations and you just come in with all your childish arrogance and sarcastically dismiss him with the most absurd dismissive statement ever. ... Ironically proving his point in the process.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:34 AM
3

That's literally not what's happening though but okay. Whatever helps you maintain your worldview that never questions yourself
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:31 AM
4

You really lack that much self-awareness?
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:22 AM
8

I was talking about the difference between the amount of men and the amount of women, again, this isn't complicated stuff but if you were even using at least two brain cells you would have seen that. This isn't about the raw numbers who didn't get in. It's the ratio. Funny how when these differences exist in favor of men in anything whatsoever at even a tiny tiny amount, feminists flip the fuck out... like the fabricated gender pay gam. But when it's the opposite you all find a million reasons t…
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:05 AM
7

You genuinely have no idea that programs exist to help girls go to college? Wow you really aren't that aware of how the world works or are insisting on playing dumb Someone disagreeing with you and calling out your bullshit isn't the same thing as having an emotional reaction. You are claiming to be in a people focused therapy profession and you can't realize that? Jesus maybe your school really was that bad.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:03 AM
6

1300 men who didn't get into college is insignificant to you? I mean sure way to show your lack of empathy but okay. No I said that after you mentioned the scholarships. I'm not a man? 😂😂😂 And here we go again, such a typical childish woman. Your insults aren't even original... They just, like, the same as every other woman who takes herself too seriously. Maybe the men in the real world see how fragile you are and how you try to emotionally attack anyone who disagrees with you so they don't dis…
/r/MensRights21/08/25 12:58 AM
6

So why are you over here bragging that you didn't get a scholarship when instead you just have rich parents? So weird. Here's the data from the University of Nevada. Again, you don't know what you are talking about. Men: ~84.5% (3,693 admitted - 4,372 applied) Women: ~85.9% (4,922 admitted - 5,728 applied) When these special programs exist, and even all the way to middle and high school there are programs to help women apply for college... You can say all you want but that doesn't change the yea…
/r/MensRights21/08/25 12:03 AM
6

I know because you can tell she's actually putting work in and thinking it through. You got no scholarships? Which means you weren't smart enough to get scholarships. Which means you absolutely were there because of a quota. Get over yourself, you didn't earn that spot... You took it from someone who was more qualified. You also benefited from 18 years of an education system that was built primarily by and for women. You aren't even smart enough to know that this stuff happens. Georgia tech for …
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:43 PM
5

Oh look, a woman dismissing a man's real lived experience just because she doesn't like it. How original
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:24 PM
12

So basically, it doesn't matter if it was already trending upwards at that point you are going to credit feminism for it. Brilliant. But actually, you mean the point in time when women started to receive special subsidies and quotas to go to school? Quotas they have now surpassed in the opposite direction but still keep mooching off of. Let's cut the subsidies and see how many women actually get into colleges.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:16 PM
19

It's literally not though. Women obtaining graduate degrees predates even the concept of feminism.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:09 PM
1

Soooo you think they should just get married and not actually contribute what a man wants in return? What a dream huh
/r/MensRights20/08/25 09:39 PM
2

No... you said I made a claim about one thing when I made it about another. Just more bad faith arguments, showing us the child you are. Immature women 101: When all else fails, try to pretend the argument is about something else entirely
/r/MensRights20/08/25 06:47 PM
3

Wow you really don't listen do you. I should have known you'd try this strategy... When faced with facts you don't like, just trying to pretend I'm arguing something I'm not.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 06:42 PM
3

Wasting your time? Clearly you haven't done the first bit of research and just want to argue uneducated bullshit. Yes, words have meaning... united has a different definition than majority. It's not complicated. I never backtracked, we were on a side conversation and I was replying to that one comment and you're trying to pretend I was still replying to the parent. Yawn. You're beyond me teaching you stuff because you clearly just want to insult and throw a tantrum. If you're not mature enough t…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 05:54 PM
5

No you asked for united data. Act like a child and twist my words and you get nothing. I also never said women opposed the spouse rape laws...I swear are you literally just incompetent at communicating truthfully or what is going on here? I provided the worldview.... you're too childish to examine the worldview and instead resorted to trying to shame me instead. Look at you asking about kids as some idiotic emotional move. Again, act like an idiotic child... don't be surprised when men don't res…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 05:35 PM
7

I never said they were united, look at you trying to twist my words. How typical 🙄 That's the problem, that they weren't united. A united minority can easily overthrow the views of a disunited majority. Oh grow up, assuming that I have any that wish to speak to me? Women say stupid antagonistic shit like this...then you can't figure out why people didn't think it'd be a good idea to let you vote? It's simple... because you, a modern woman, clearly are incapable of addressing facts without resort…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 05:29 PM
6

*Some women didn't like their position at the time. To pretend it was a majority is ignorant at best and openly dishonest at worst. Most women actually opposed these movements at the time and the data is clear about that. Men are obligated to pay for everything, even after they divorce, even without kids. Even within a marriage if a man tries to set a budget and control the one thing he still has control over... women immediately coined the hilarious term of "financial abuse". It's hilarious, it…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 05:06 PM
8

I'm actually not but ok dude Nah honestly don't care about some fool on the street's perspective on history. You're literally asking for old values to be evaluated through a modern feminist lense ya genius. Of course they will complain.... like they do about everything. Equality doesn't care about your feelings on being equal.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 04:55 PM
6

Oh so I should let peer pressure and women's feelings impact historical facts? Weird take. It was a simple concept, if you don't want to have sex... don't get married.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 04:44 PM
10

That's because at marriage, the husband was consenting to protect and provide and she was consenting to sexual availability. The law actually treated women and men more equal then than they do now because under today's laws only a man can legally be bound to his spousal duties and a woman can stop doing hers and freeload with zero consequences.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 04:34 PM
17

Funny enough, some of the very first workers protection laws were written to prevent women from the dangers of the mining industry. After a while it was law that companies could not risk the lives of their female employees in those types of roles and that women must be employed in administrative or supervisory roles instead.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 04:02 PM
9

Because it's not true... it's feel good bullshit. Five minutes of googling proves all of this wrong and pulls up countless legal examples disproving this nonsense.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 03:31 PM
18

One of the best shut downs is the literal Bank of England saying that women were some of the earliest investors and depositors...in 1694. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/museum/whats-on/2019/325-years-exhibition/a-more-inclusive-history
/r/MensRights20/08/25 03:26 PM
25

Both of those claims are boldfaced lies. The single only place you find this is feminist textbooks. Heck, even Martha Washington was a wealthy business owner.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 03:00 PM
41

That's 100% not true. Like at all. In fact, even as far at the American revolution they had special privileges and benefits when working...by law
/r/MensRights20/08/25 02:56 PM
32

It's funny how much people will lie and rewrite history just to justify their preexisting hatred.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 02:15 PM
81

Fun fact, in China, military spouses can be criminally prosecuted for cheating or leaving him during certain time windows. Definitely something we should implement because it absolutely impacts readiness
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:33 PM
8

I recently went to a historic tavern from the Revolutionary War. I wish I had taken a picture of this, but on the wall they had all of the employment laws for women. It was wild, like no factory work except for in supervisor or administrative positions. No working more than X hours per day. etc I mean think about it, the law literally prohibited employers from putting women in the dangerous jobs.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 02:51 PM
1

What a shame that you're only light bulb moment is your brain justifying your own ridiculousness. It's a tool your brain uses to cope and avoid confronting the reality of your worldview.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 03:32 PM
3

Can you actually examine your own flaws without impulsively trying to deflect to other people being the problem? Because it really doesn't seem like you can.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:23 AM
7

Oh look, trying to deflect the blame onto other people instead of examining your own flaws. Damn it's like you are treating this book like a checklist of how to behave.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:55 AM
4

The fact that you think you aren't doing anything just goes to show how little self-awareness you have. And how poor your ability to examine your own behavior is. And to think, you want to be treated like the rest of society, and respected right? Well you got to start acting like a fucking adult
/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:39 AM
1

Oh man, I got into an argument with someone on one of these subs about the time it takes to do groceries. She was fully insisting it takes like 5 to 8 hours per week to go to the grocery store. It's like what on Earth are you doing that entire time? She got pretty mad when I said she was inefficient at shopping 😂
/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:10 AM
1

Oh man, I got into an argument with someone on one of these subs about the time it takes to do groceries. She was fully insisting it takes like 5 to 8 hours per week to go to the grocery store. It's like what on Earth are you doing that entire time? She got pretty mad when I said she was inefficient at shopping 😂
/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:09 AM
7

Mom absolutely, sister sometimes, granny no because her generation were actually women with dignity. No one said it's 100% so stfu. But look at you doing it 😘
/r/MensRights16/05/25 04:38 AM
10

Oh look, the exact shaming tactics that the book says women use when called out for what's really going on.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 01:38 AM
1

You still aren't even listening to what my real argument is. You aren't crafting anything, you are punching an input into ChatGPT and trying to pass it off as your own. It's not even refining anything, the entire structure is you punching the question into the system and it giving you an output. Again, this is a forum for humans, if we wanted bots we would seek them out. What a weird way to protect your ego from self-examination. Just label me as a bitter and angry troll and then you have now ju…
/r/MensRights29/04/25 01:35 AM
1

He's not polishing for grammar...this is 100% AI generated. It's in the style it answers the question. Big difference
/r/MensRights29/04/25 12:52 AM
3

Sounds like you don't know what the definition of projecting is. Maybe you should ask Chat GPT
/r/MensRights28/04/25 09:08 PM
2

I think you are overestimating your input. There's a reason we're able to look at this and immediately detect that it is chat GPT. Grow up, holding a standard is not being butthurt. I already told my issue, my new secondary issue is your inability to genuinely listen to other people.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 08:23 PM
1

The problem here is that you are passing it off on your own writing until you are called out on it. You say copywritten, no it was just written.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 08:15 PM
2

But ultimately, we are here to have human discussions. If we wanted to go to ChatGPT...we would. ChatGPT already has access to all of the world's blog posts, books, scientific studies, etc. ChatGPT is valuable and useful for lots of cases, like figuring out how to articulate yourself or why a certain issue bothers you. But outsourcing your entire worldview to AI and posting it here as authentic is disingenuous. This ultimately will create a feedback loop of no unique thought, AI being trained an…
/r/MensRights28/04/25 07:50 PM
21

Are you really just reposting ChatGPT answers lol. Your entire post history is EXACTLY how ChatGPT answers questions.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 03:57 PM
2

How about you do your own research before you start arguing something.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 10:46 AM
3

It literally takes 5 seconds for you to Google what documents are required to get a driver's license in California and you will see that one of them is a social security card for which they run the verification on. Jesus dude think for yourself here
/r/MensRights14/04/25 01:52 AM
3

Did you read the page, it explains that. It also explains the license type for non-citizens that is not a part of that program.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 01:04 AM
1

She? Feminist. Stop fabricating things about me simply because your arguments suck. That comment is still there. Maybe the problem is on your end....with literally everything.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 01:04 AM
3

It literally took me five seconds to google and find how the program works and how you're full of shit. I swear do people not actually look into anything on their own anymore and just quote their favorite news source? https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/california-motor-voter/frequently-asked-questions
/r/MensRights14/04/25 12:43 AM
2

Ok child. Knock it off. Maybe you've never actually had any real men in your life? Maybe your definition of men are those who feed into your wishy washy view of the world. No one ever called you out on your bullshit before? I can see that. Cite your original claims or stfu. Your lack of citations while I have provided mine says all we need to know about your level of emotionality and how little facts matter to you. If your foundation is so emotionally reactive, everything else seems emotional in…
/r/MensRights14/04/25 12:09 AM
1

Data that you are unable to produce, that I have provided plenty of sources against where the originator of those claims even admitted were false in court. Yea because there are no left leaning men? Or at least no men who don't buy into your bullshit? How arrogant are you to think that all men share your worldview. Lmfao dude, is your entire schtick just to mentally project onto everyone. So weird man, if you want a dick pic just say so instead of doing this weird dance Yea good explanation as t…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 11:55 PM
2

LMFAO dude, I think I figured it out... you have a worldview and then seek out data points to confirm those facts. Instead of behaving logically and not resorting to stereotypes and quick conclusions. Really explains everything about your conspiracy riddles worldview
/r/MensRights13/04/25 11:23 PM
3

Such a weird take dude. You can look through my entire post history and see who the fuck I am. I feel like this is another weird version of your own mental protection.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 11:03 PM
3

As real as your chat GPT question? I'm not insulted I just think you are ridiculous. The merit of my argument should stand alone regardless of my gender. It's a ridiculous question to ask unless you are so useless at defending your own argument that you have to resort to gendered stereotypes to try and attack it that way. I'm a man, born and raised.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 10:43 PM
2

You expect people to honestly deny every ridiculous accusation you throw at them? Nah, some things are best left ignored because they are childish AF.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 10:16 PM
1

No. I have been quite clear about my point. In fact I emphasized what the point was. If you took away something so dramatic, maybe you should look into the mirror as to why you keep defaulting to insulting other people by calling them ladies.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 10:11 PM
2

"I bet...." Yea, I think that explains your level of analysis pretty well. The point isn't if the system of checks and balances caught it, the point is proving that the intention behind it or the unintended consequences are dramatic. So simply saying everyone should have an ID is not grounded in how the world actually works.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 10:01 PM
3

Set in my bias? Dude you are making claims that flat out have not been proven. You can't do the research because it does not exist. Well documented...on conspiracy websites sure. Not even the professional equipment, it's about the databases. Dude you're upholding debunked conspiracies here, there's nothing logical about your entire premise. Most of your claims were flatly originated by Russian propaganda agencies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm-1516 and Project Veritas got the shit sued out …
/r/MensRights13/04/25 09:41 PM
9

I'm not talking about homeless. Duplicates occur in every election?😂😂 Citation definitely needed. They are often fake after the polls closed? Dude cite your bullshit. Anybody can print off ballots? Anybody? Really? How exactly
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:25 PM
2

You have a weird definition of proving your point. No I don't personally know anyone because I live in a major city that actually gives a shit about ensuring everyone has access to voter ID. That's the point. You probably have never interacted with the type of people that are getting disenfranchised. Is your mindset really that shallow and stupid to say if it's not happening here it's not happening anywhere? I haven't seen it happen with my own eyes therefore it's not true? Tell me you know noth…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:08 PM
4

Notice the mental barriers you have already put in place to protect yourself against any legitimate criticism. Chat GPT? Really dude. This isn't even a complicated topic. There's never been a legitimate election audit that upholds any of the claims you are making. You seem to forget that mail-in ballots have barcodes and security systems built into them. That's what I mean you are ignorant. It's not a trope, it's a reality. The fact that you think it's a trope shows how ignorant you are of this …
/r/MensRights13/04/25 04:53 PM
-13

Propaganda machine? Dude calm down. There are legitimate concerns when a good portion of the population is unable to get an ID and states actively make it difficult to get IDs by shutting down ID centers in minority heavy cities. Unverifiable mail-in ballots? Dude just tell us you have no idea how this system works already.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 04:41 PM
1

Dude, you went out of your way to basically just constantly tell everyone that we just hate women. As if you know what we think better than you do. Talk about some next level narcissism there.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:21 PM
1

Oh my bad I misunderstood. Maybe that's why you perceive hatred everywhere... because you are hateful. There's literally zero hatred going on in this thread, but you felt the need to go out of your way, to a place where people are genuinely talking about their issues, and instead decide to just be a negative force claiming that everyone really just hates women. It's mind-boggling how much energy you put into being a negative force upon society and then you are over here complaining about the ene…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:19 PM
1

Not really, but keep projecting your own issues onto other people. Maybe that's why you think everyone hates you
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:16 PM
1

Yes, that is correct. Sarcasm, irony, a bit of swearing, and making fun of you. Glad you figured that out. At least you have that level of listening skills.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:03 PM
2

It's wild how easily this stuff can be debunked, but no one cares... feminists just keep lying. Hell, Martha Washington was a wealthy land and farm owner even before she married George. She was one of the trend setting women for how they were treated in this country from the first presidency.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 07:04 PM
1

Oh knock it off. That's a childish argument. "Oh no, they disagree with me...that means they hate meeeee. Waaaaa 😭" Goddamn learn that disagreement and critique isn't hate, it's actually a very important thing to learn.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 07:00 PM
22

As Benjamin Franklin said, "When women cease to be handsome, they study to be good"
/r/MensRights27/12/24 03:36 PM
2

Asking Chat GPT the hard questions so you don't have to. Hand soap seems to be the move https://chat.openai.com/share/83773444-992a-48a7-95bd-d54b3a9a86a6
/r/MensRights21/03/24 06:03 AM
18

Stop being a dick
/r/MensRights16/02/24 09:18 AM
1

You certainly seem to care a lot. So here I am :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/23 12:41 AM
1

Telling me to talk to someone who's interested. Yes that's exactly my point. You have a complete lack of a spine and inability to stand for something like a man and have those difficult conversations, so instead you try to worm your way out of it being like "you have that difficult conversation with someone because I'm too scared" under the assumption that other men are as weak as you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/23 12:30 AM
2

Orrr....there are standards that need to be upheld regardless of the situation. But nah, based on how absolutely emotional you get I don't think you know what it's like to actually stand strong for something with integrity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/23 12:08 AM
2

I don't take orders from you. You're the one here with the stupid take, so I'm calling you out on it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/23 04:04 AM
4

Stop being such a drama queen. No it is not a reason to get leniency. Let me get this straight, his grades are suffering. That means he is not retaining the information or learning what needs to be learned. But you want an institution to sign off saying that yes he actually learned this? This is advocating for the epitome of participation trophies. Heaven forbid he actually needs to use that information such as when building a building, conducting a surgery, etc. But oh well it doesn't matter if…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/23 04:43 PM
2

Okay? Then he should drop out or temporarily disenroll. If they can't meet the standard, then they need to adjust their own life instead of demanding the standard be lowered. No one is forcing them to complete a degree at that moment in time. All it does is make the standard worthless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/23 04:32 PM
3

You are the one here saying this is about addressing victims needs. So apparently this is a need, for them to get degrees without meeting the standards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/23 04:24 PM
3

So victims need to be able to fail classes now? Fascinating
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/23 12:56 PM
-2

Do you even English?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 12:10 AM
79

/r/leftwingmaleadvocates is pretty good Stay away from mens_lib it's just garbage, feminists trying to explain why men are at fault for every issue we have.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 08:53 AM
11

I reported this exact group to fb for that about three months ago... obviously fb claimed they didn't violate any rules 🙄
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:04 PM
2

The best stats we have on the subject indicate that when compared to false reports of other crimes, false reports of rape occur at a rate of over 500% higher than false reports of other crimes. The evidence is clear, the two things that people can benefit from by filing false reports of (rape and robbery) occur at higher rates than false reports of crimes that have no such benefit. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315728247_The_Prevalence_of_False_Allegations_of_Rape_in_the_United_States…
/r/MensRights18/06/22 10:08 PM
24

Uh no. It absolutely did not. It was restricted to the land owners...the people who literally invested their fortunes to create the country. Yea stop trying to spin a narrative dude
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:03 PM
28

Most men weren't able to vote either at first. Also voting was also tied to the actual requirements to be able to die for the country. You build it, you have an obligation to risk your life for it...you have a say in it. Women literally did not lead the revolution against the British or form any government...yet want all the benefits by like, just, being there.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 01:48 PM
1

No. That's what feminism ADVERTISES itself as. Very big difference between actions and words.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 06:02 AM
1

Yes, a woman had unprotected sex. Yay congrats to her. So we commend women for not using a condom now and that's it? Like talk about the bare minimum.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 06:01 AM
4

Right... assets and investments that I worked for and I built. That's exactly the problem.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:17 AM
5

Ok you're just arguing in bad faith then. Investments, bank accounts, etc. c'mon now. The other two points, the house not true at all. Alimony, you're in an extremely extremely rare situation then.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:37 AM
4

You're forgetting alimony, the house, and at least 50% of the money the man earned while with her. Idk if you're ignorant of the issues or in bad faith here, but us men aren't just being dramatic about marriage. It literally ruins lives.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:29 AM
8

I want to die not having lost everything to someone I used to love. That's not to say I won't love... it's to say I won't give her an incentive of taking everything I own if she leaves (and statistically speaking, it's the woman who will leave)
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:23 AM
14

Again...I said nothing about love. I said marriage.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:15 AM
12

I'm not married for that reason. Stop thinking you're special. No one enters marriage expecting it to fail...yet 50% do. There's a difference between blind hope and living in reality. Single most common piece of advice I've ever gotten from older men, married men, single men, divorced men, it doesn't matter.... it's always "don't get married"
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:15 AM
22

Q: Did I ever say love changed? A: No. I said the rules of the game changed. Aka the laws and courts.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:13 AM
16

Us men have seen 15, 20, 25 year deep in love marriages fall apart overnight on a whim and then the man is on the hook paying for it. You should really get out more before you start preaching to men about our experiences, on a men's forum.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:12 AM
24

The rules of the game have changed over the years, more knowledge now, or just seeing how the status of marriage doesn't change how he could have all he has now without that contract.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:09 AM
17

Everyone is deeply in love... until they aren't
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:06 AM
1

That is absolutely fascinating. Thanks for digging that up
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/21 03:03 AM
1

Do you have the link to that / citation? I'm definitely curious to dig into that a bit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 09:37 AM
7

As opposed to just marching in and claiming another two countries are actually yours.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:25 AM
0

please tell me you understand how laws can have lingering effects Pretty sure I made that clear. You can google Red Lining and how it still impacts cities today, it's a very simple example. Also you've yet to show ANYTHING like any laws whatsoever that discriminate against you here. I've given so so many examples yet you have...nothin
/r/MensRights16/10/20 10:57 PM
0

Because laws 40 years ago still have effects today, you realize that right? Like please tell me you understand how laws can have lingering effects. Hell there's still a town called ANNA Illinois which stands for Aint No N****s Allowed. Or like up into the 1970s when thousands of towns literally ran all the black people out of town...and those people are still residents of those towns today and they're pretty much entirely white towns for a reason. So stop trying to pretend there aren't real issu…
/r/MensRights16/10/20 03:19 PM
0

There literally are none lmao. You quite seriously have to stick your fingers in your ears and fill your head with propaganda to think that white people are disadvantaged here and that black people are not. I mean even every neutral federal policing and housing statistic indicates that. There are still impacts felt today by the red lining laws that still are on the books in some places. Hell thousands of towns around the country literally would not allow black people after dark until only about …
/r/MensRights15/10/20 11:24 PM
0

Uhh commanded you? okay dude chill. But if you see a fucked up system that goes out of its way to hurt and kill other people...you have a moral responsibility to help fix it. Especially if you're running around claiming things are already perfect as it is. Sounds like you're a selfish individual who really doesn't care as long as it doesn't impact you and that's a really sad state of being.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 05:19 PM
0

get themselves into criminal situations more frequently than whites Except that's not what happens. Study after study after study has proven that cops pull over black people more and stop them randomly more even in low crime black areas. And when they do commit crimes, they get harsher sentences than white people who did the exact same crime. You almost have to go out of your way to ignore the data that proves this stuff at this point. And even then, they don't just "happen" to do it...you have …
/r/MensRights15/10/20 03:10 PM
0

Yet somehow there are disproportionate arrests, killings, home loan denials, birth deaths, food deserts, higher prison sentences, and the list goes on and on. You as a white guy can't claim when equality is reached. It's literally not your decision. You can't tell someone who doesn't have equality "okay you have enough now". It's literally on you to listen honestly to their concerns and work to fix them. And at your own detriment? Haha get over yourself.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 11:23 PM
1

Except white people still won't give basic equality soooooo?
/r/MensRights14/10/20 03:17 PM
2

So you have an IQ that's not high enough to see how I said labeling everyone as marxists is the new way of screaming commie. They aren't marxists, it's a dismissive term. They simply have different views than you - big difference.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 03:17 PM
1

You know people with paranoia have hyper pattern recognition also? Doesn't make them smart, just means they see patterns...often where they don't exist, or where there is no actual connection - and then label themselves as being so smart. It's like the stoner who sees the Illuminati in everything...seeing connections doesn't make you smart. Heck, if anything... truly smart people absolutely NEVER brag about how smart they are. It's only dummies trying to prove something. Also you have perception…
/r/MensRights14/10/20 03:16 PM
1

But not really though. There's another perspective to that... which is that they are the only ones proactively looking out for disenfranchised people. Whereas conservatives don't give a flying fuck like your comment here. So when one side doesn't care at all, and that view is inherently one of being holier than thou... it's easy to dismiss the other side as playing victims as opposed to genuinely helping those who actually need help. Because lord knows conservatives would never do that. It's har…
/r/MensRights13/10/20 08:10 PM
1

Bwhahahahaha /r/iamverysmart If you were so smart you wouldn't be bulk labeling anyone you disagree with as marxists, that's for sure. It's a lazy man's way of sounding educated while just screaming "commieeee" like the red scare dummies did
/r/MensRights13/10/20 07:20 PM
1

Hahah good one
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:53 PM
2

No it seems like you project onto them. There's a massive difference between understanding, and making assumptions.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:52 PM
1

That's about as valid as just out of the blue using white supremacists as a subset of conservatives.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:57 PM
1

Aren't "giving ground" Heck, as most what you hear is "toughen up snowflake" and "waaa liberal tearsss". even your mindset of how it is something that you should have to give ground for, it shows how absolutely unequal the situation is. it's a fight for equality, no one should have to give any ground for equality, unless your ground is standing against equal rights.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:17 PM
1

Hilarious how you blanket label them as marxists only to be upset by them not being understanding and accepting
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:17 PM
1

Yea but this study wasn't about feminists
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:16 PM
1

Uhhh. Literally no one is forgetting it. And your argument is frankly ignorant. White people don't have lingering effects and laws that are legally mandated discrimination. Or cities where white people weren't even allowed to live until very recently. Or whole states that tried to ban white people. Also you don't exactly look dark skinned...it isn't so much a slavery thing, in fact that's a very minor factor overall. It's the very obvious visual difference that makes it easy to discriminate and …
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:03 PM
0

Haha except...white people generally aren't. That's literally the source of all the culture issues in the US right now. You may think you are, but if the other side who is impacted by the situation say you aren't...well maybe it's not your call
/r/MensRights13/10/20 04:44 PM
1

Nope, wasn't at all. I'm saying that the mindsets that these people are against are generally very authoritarian, violent, hostile, and downright inhumane at times. So standing up against that isn't so much as intolerance as it is having some actual values.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 04:41 PM
-4

There's a difference between having a difference in opinion...and a difference of values. Like actually valuing human life, decency, compassion, humanity, human rights, etc. versus thinking it's okay to shit on people for their very existence
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:43 PM
0

I didn't say all of it was. But it does refer to it...which is something you said they didn't. Soooo
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:42 PM
0

Well it depends on what you are trying to say. Feminist groups, I agree for the most part...LGTB, ehh what exactly are you trying to say? Especially if you're worried about what you have to say to BLM supporters...like are you trying to pull the "aLl lIvEs MaTtEr" bs because like, that's not even a legitimate argument anymore. It's clear there are issues against black people so people who want to argue against that have to intentionally ignore the real facts in front of them. Its turning into a …
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:38 PM
3

Haha I kinda expected it, but sometime people gotta step up and be like holllupp yall
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:34 PM
-6

Except it is though, it lists specific examples of speakers who are known for their instigation
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:33 PM
-1

Tolerance of intolerance and hatred isn't quite the same thing. It's like "FU, you should die and be kicked out of the country...oh what, you mad bruh? you don't want to tolerate me?" Cmon now.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:05 PM
-9

FIRE is BY FAR not a legitimate source. It's basically a think tank that already has those views...that happens to publish a study that happens to perfectly align with those pre-existing view. Big shocker. You gotta dig into their methodology a bit before anything...because it just defies common sense that gay people value less free speech than those who literally think gay people should not exist. Like hey, we don't want some guy to talk here who literally hates our very existance... that's not…
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:03 PM
0

You were doing great there up until the whole "cuckland" thing
/r/MensRights01/11/18 02:45 PM
6

This sounds suspiciously similar to the whole "he has so much potential" argument that women (and everyone) hates so much about Brock Turner.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 02:53 PM
1

That's really detailed and helpful thanks so much! Do you have any sources or details about NOW or any other groups actually working to redefine rape? That kind of information is extremely important to get public and kill this narrative that "feminism = equality" and start focusing on working together on issues.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 12:01 PM
6

Do you have the source for that CDC study? I can't seem to find it myself. I'm trying to start anything, I just think it's important to source our number and also get these sources out there in the public and let people see them for themselves.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 03:31 PM
0

No you're twisting my words again, nice try but no. Men banded together to put an end to the British tyranny, I didn't see any women's groups doing that. No one forced the men to risk their lives. They did it on their own, once they won they established norms for the people who put in the work. Eventually they opened the system to everyone. You can view it as two ways 1) OMG THEY OPPRESSED WOMEN! or 2) They put a system in place to protect everyone and the people who had a stake in that protecti…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 05:10 PM
0

And who created the system of voting in order to build a stable society and not be controlled by dictators and kings / queens? Who voted to give it to women? I forget, ya know, cuz I'm fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 05:00 PM
0

You should have taken a logic class in K-12 as well then man, I shouldn't have to teach you what a fallacy is. You realize that not all education is equal right? People learn stuff throughout K-12 in the South that's flatly wrong, and in other parts of the country that is extremely biased. Just because you learned it as a kid doesn't mean it was right. when they had no say in the outcome Again, PROOF? If you want anyone to ever believe a damn thing you say, you gotta back it up. Not be like "wel…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:54 PM
0

Oh so do "Do my research for me and prove me right" nah man, you need a logic class more than anything. If you're going to make absurd claims like saying a full 50% of humanity was enslaved against their will, it's on you to back those claims up.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:49 PM
0

So basically, no you don't have proof of anything. Cool.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:39 PM
0

Goddamn your mental limbo is insane. No I didn't blame women for that, I flatly said I didn't. SOCIETY didn't allow this, not men - you can't examine a society and eliminate the contribution half the people. By your logic you could also say men weren't allowed to stay home and not contribute to the family income, by women. Cooperation means each side has equivalent weight and make decisions mutually. Fact is, historically men were the decision makers. That's not cooperation, that's being told ho…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:29 PM
1

Stop arguing what you think I'm saying and listen to what I'm saying - I never said ANYONE had it great You literally tried to argue that it was okay that women had no say in the government because men were there to protect them. That's as illogical as it gets. I honestly can't even figure out if you're just trolling or actually believe that shit. Show me where I said government, at all. And show me what logical fallacy I used. Just because you say something is illogical doesn't make it so. No I…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:38 PM
2

That's as dumb as asking me if I have any proof slaves everywhere were or weren't happy Stop comparing them to slaves, we already went through this. You've entered the land of circular reasoning and if you want to resort to such blatantly obvious logical fallacies as opposed to arguing facts with proof, I'm out. You're saying women were slaves and the proof is that they were unhappy and the reason you say they were unhappy is because they were slaves. 100% undiluted circular reasoning. You reali…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:14 AM
1

A significant number isn't even a majority, and you act like that was a female exclusive issue - it was not. Even if you want to take that route, you can only do so within the context of very very few societies at the time. I feel like you have this big oppressive history in your head, but it's only accurate if you don't look at all of the details. Do you have any proof of what all women everywhere were or weren't happy about or are you just blowing more hot air? I didn't say anything about the …
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:04 AM
1

Nice job putting words into my mouth. I love how much of a stretch this is. Slaves didn't enter their contracts voluntarily. Free black people didn't fantasize and write endless poems and novels about wanting to someday become a slave to a master. Slaves didn't have their potential master work for years without pay, just to be able to look at them without a veil. Slaves weren't able to commit crimes and have their masters pushed for it and they walk away free. You act like marriage was something…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:39 AM
1

What?? No that's literally the opposite of what I said. Tell me what exactly I said was dictating a woman's life? Don't even try to pull the slavery nonsense. Women weren't slaves, that's such an outrageous parallel it's not even funny. You act like women had 0 rights which is flatly false.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:28 AM
1

For what responsibilities? Needing to eat and have a place to live? It's not like men had much of a choice either. Women shamed weak men who wouldn't fight or provide as well. Even dating back thousands of years, there are clear records of women choosing the warriors or providers of their society. There are very very few points in history when men could just decide "nah, I just want to stay home and play with the kids" and all of society would be fine with it. You realize the reason for the draf…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:05 AM
2

Oh yea, not being forced to die is some disadvantage. Even in times of calm, men were still responsible for protection, provision, taming the wilderness, fighting the wild animals, killing for food, working in deadly situations just to feed women at home who never once had to risk her life for any aspect of her role. Stop looking at this as oppression and look at it as cooperation. It doesn't matter if women feel they are treated equally, this is about the facts of the situation - not the feelin…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 02:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter