~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsI will try. Here's a few unanswered questions, maybe you answered them and I am just confused by your answer, I am not sure: What are you constantly referencing? The Psychology Today mistake that I openly admitted making several times? Tell me, do you really care about such a thing? What do you gain from consistently telling someone that they were wrong, even when said person openly admits it? "You had an out by being able to claim the moral victory over "a 12 year old response"." What does "mor… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/18 10:19 PM |
| 1 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsI am very frustrated with this conversation but am trying to stay respectful and not offend you in any way. My apologies if I have, as sometimes my anger slips out. Either way, would you mind answering my questions please? You have been ignoring quite a few in the last replies. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/18 09:08 PM |
| 1 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsMy apologies if you are offended- I was honestly not intending to do such a thing but simply point out what I had seen when doing some research on the matter. I have thought of Psychology Today as a trusted source, but still to assume something such as that it follows the DSM-5 strictly is a stretch. As I have stated to r/mwobuddy, yes, I will clearly admit that I was wrong in assuming that Psychology Today goes strictly by the DSM-5. "...you are right and it is the definitive answer." This seem… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/18 09:02 PM |
| 1 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standards"Retain logical clarity?" Once again, please define said phrase. To put it simply, yes, I am attacking your character. However, I find it absurd that you, if I understand your use of the word "ad homs" correctly, believe that I have failed to answer/ respond to your questions/ points. I have tried to answer every question, address each points made, etc. If you do believe that I am "using ad homs" I believe it your responsibility to inform me, prove to me how so, and to converse with me about wha… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/18 08:42 PM |
| 1 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsWould you mind removing the "rekt" and "buttfucked"- that is precisely why people have told you you were immature. It only ruins your credibility. To be honest, I am shocked that with your shown immaturity you have started a subreddit for those of sexual assaults. I explained that yes, I made a mistake. The mistake was in thinking that the articles are on the basis of the DSM-5. The qoute I just happened to have see on a trusted source of mine that, once more, I incorrectly considered to go off … | /r/MensRights | 31/05/18 08:08 PM |
| 1 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsWhat is "face?" Once more- this is not a debate, that is not my intent nor wish. Rather, I intend and wish to converse with you. I never intended on leaving as I wished to have a conversation with you. I am open to new ideas and want to hear them- such as the ones you have. Besides this, and most important to me, it seemed you had wished to talk with me as well and wanted clarification. Now I see that you wished rather to disprove/ debunk my source. I also gave you the option to leave as you imp… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/18 07:46 PM |
| 1 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsIn no way have I, at the very least intended, implied the crucial significance equalling to "the Bible." If you wish to debate the DSM-5 I would be happy to do so, to which it seems you do. There is criticism about every similar manuel- that doesn't change the fact it is a trusted manuel to the majority of the field. Most of those criticisms are about ratification or disgust with the current version- that is why they work to rewrite the manuel for future versions. Just as we have Amendments, we … | /r/MensRights | 31/05/18 07:38 PM |
| 1 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsYou are refusing to tell me this "way out"- thus I can not give you a reaction that complies with what you are hoping for. So, for gosh sakes just tell me what in the forty acres you are talking about! Is this about that Psychology Today source that I admit may have some inconsistencies (mistakes)? Had I not told you that "yes, you are technically correct..." to which implies I may be wrong? Tell me, do you really care about such a thing? What do you gain from consistently telling someone that t… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/18 07:24 PM |
| 1 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsWhat does a "moral" victory mean? You act like this is an accomplishment- this is a conversation not a debate, this, there are no wins/ losses. If you pride yourself in this victory- whatever "victory" it is- I'm happy that you feel that way, even though I feel that it is ridiculous. So, am I supposed to say that you defeated me? Quite honestly, I don't care nor do I really feel that way. Because you have failed to mention my points I trust that you have nothing else to say on the matter at hand… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/18 03:52 AM |
| 4 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsJabbering? I am having a conversation just as you are (though it seems you seek to debate this matter.) I am not forcing you to converse with me- stop if you so desire. I will not be offended if you do so, but simply believe you have nothing more to say. "I hoped I'd give you a moral superiority?" Define said phrase. I don't quite understand this syntax. However, I do understand the simple point- you are wanting to "shut me up" with your "superiority" in intelligence. If so, this is a very immat… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/18 01:11 AM |
| 7 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsBe mature- this is a serious post and discussion so please consider rethinking your professionalism. Prepubescent: "of, relating to, being in, or occurring in the period of development immediately preceding puberty." So, by definition, you are correct. However, there is what's called hebephilia which deals with pubescent children- which, is the period of puberty itself. It isn't recognized in the DSM-5 and is a walking a sketchy line in the world of Psychiatry, but nonetheless it is an acknowled… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/18 11:35 PM |
| 11 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standardsPsychology Today uses definitions of disorders from the DSM-5. The DSM-5 is the source used for any and all psychiatric disorders. The articles are also written by professionals in the field with doctorates in Psychology and Psychiatry, I believe. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/18 10:37 PM |
| 1 | Had to take the mandatory "Campus SaVE Act for Students - Sexual Violence Awareness" course for college. Not one question, nor statistic, was about male victims- just female victims.I have yet to find a valid fact in relation to this question. Oh, and I failed, trust me. Luckily I could take it multiple times. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/18 08:06 PM |
| 3 | Had to take the mandatory "Campus SaVE Act for Students - Sexual Violence Awareness" course for college. Not one question, nor statistic, was about male victims- just female victims.The skrewed up thing about it all is that there are so many different numbers for the same fact- so which one is the TRUE fact? Here's an image of a RAINN graphic ( with citation) that claims that it is 1/6 women. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/18 08:01 PM |
| 50 | The naked truth about most media's dishonest double standards"Pedophilia is defined as the fantasy or act of sexual activity with children who are generally age 13 years or younger." - PsychologyToday | /r/MensRights | 30/05/18 07:55 PM |
| 3 | Had to take the mandatory "Campus SaVE Act for Students - Sexual Violence Awareness" course for college. Not one question, nor statistic, was about male victims- just female victims.I should clarify- there wasn't any false information- just practically no information on men at all in the course. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/18 07:44 PM |
| 3 | Had to take the mandatory "Campus SaVE Act for Students - Sexual Violence Awareness" course for college. Not one question, nor statistic, was about male victims- just female victims.Appreciate the comments. Wouldn't mind throwing a Title IX complaint at them, however, they most likely would fire back by saying that they did mention men, directly. Not really, though. Here's what they actually said about men: "Although studies show that females are the most likely group to experience intimate partner violence (more woman victimizing), men are also at risk of being harmed by their partners." No studies mentioned about men- but more victimizing of woman. They also mention (more… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/18 07:39 PM |
| 0 | Wonka brings the facts...It' Sarcastic Wonka. It's a classic meme. I wanted to create a meme for the fun of it so, boom. In essence- no point, really. Just a dull attempt at humor whilst proving my indirect point about false facts being provided by feminists. Appreciate the read and question! | /r/MensRights | 20/04/18 04:49 AM |
| 1 | Wonka brings the facts...No worries! This was a study on "male privilege" by an Ohio college/University (if I'm not mistaken) that claims that women are more disadvantaged through the stats shown in the first pic. These are FALSE facts/stats claimed by feminists. So, I set out to prove these were false by providing the facts on the bottom. The middle is just a Sarcastic Willy Wonka ( a old meme) who is basically saying the same thing- these are NOT true facts. So it's kinda in the POV of Wonka who is responding to the f… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/18 04:45 AM |
| 2 | Wonka brings the facts...It may not be a best meme, but I had good attentions- I promise. If anyone wants a source, I'll be sure to get it to you so just let me know. On a separate and late note: R.I.P. Gene Wilder | /r/MensRights | 20/04/18 03:20 AM |
| 1 | Mark your calendars, guys! "Get Your Boys: Male Accountability to #metoo"No, I actually just stumbled upon this event ( also I live in the midwest- not anywhere near Phillie.) I mainly wanted to see what you guys thought about this event- to me it seems to be patronizing and a offensive stereotype of men, but maybe I misunderstood what they were trying to accomplish. I feel like they have some positives to their goals, but it's hidden beneath the negatives. That's my two cents. Agreed- sausage and bacon are crucial to my diet. Any recommendations/ suggestions for pre… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/18 03:21 AM |
| 1 | Mark your calendars, guys! "Get Your Boys: Male Accountability to #metoo"Sorry to post another comment, but I want to hear from you guys- what do you think about the Pyramid of Rape Culture? I have personally never heard of this, nor seen anything like implemented. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/18 02:51 AM |
| 1 | Mark your calendars, guys! "Get Your Boys: Male Accountability to #metoo"Opps- it looks like we all missed it. Sorry to those looking forward to it... | /r/MensRights | 29/03/18 02:43 AM |
| 1 | Men are 'f-ing misogynistic sexist pigs?' "Susan Sarandon: Paul Newman gave me part of his salary"Nobodies for certain it's satire- it's written by a psychologist so you would expect professional behavior. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/18 04:48 PM |
| 3 | Men are 'f-ing misogynistic sexist pigs?' "Susan Sarandon: Paul Newman gave me part of his salary"I looked up this shitty book on Amazon- 1.4 stars out of 5. It was literally rated by customers interested in Science Fiction. The reviews are even worse- Disgusting book aimed at educating women on how to misuse our laws to unjustifyibly ruin a mans reputation and career by falsely accusing him of something. This is the kind of feminist drivel that is tearing men and women apart. If you want to see why men are no longer interested in women this book gives you a clear and obvious clue. Misandry … | /r/MensRights | 09/03/18 04:05 PM |
| 1 | Men are 'f-ing misogynistic sexist pigs?' "Susan Sarandon: Paul Newman gave me part of his salary"Great catch! I guess I've been trying to hard to find something positive that Sarandon said I completely ignored context and went for the words- not their meaning. On another note, I completely agree. To me, it's straight-up prostitution. Prostitute > deserving actress? That scale is not only daunting but also repulsive. Speaking of repulsive- you know how Megan Fox got her role in Transformers? She washed Michael Bay's sports car. Utter bullshit how a amateur and all around horrible actress lik… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/18 03:50 PM |
| 2 | Men are 'f-ing misogynistic sexist pigs?' "Susan Sarandon: Paul Newman gave me part of his salary"Can agree with you there. That's why I say I don't fully agree with her except for the last couple lines of quote. To me, I'm confused why she talks about sleeping for power, but goes on to talk about how she would have to see more Weinsteins. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/18 07:18 AM |
| 1 | Men are 'f-ing misogynistic sexist pigs?' "Susan Sarandon: Paul Newman gave me part of his salary"While I may not fully agree with Sarandon's perspective on the issue at hand, I enjoy and agree with her last couple quotes BBC noted. "What we don't want to have is being exploited and have the Harvey Weinsteins of the world holding it over your head and holding it over your project... That is the most despicable." | /r/MensRights | 09/03/18 05:32 AM |
| 2 | A boy who underwent a botched circumcision in 1965 is forced and told he is a girl- almost resulting in a sex change.That's because it is. If you watch the video they tell you that within the first few minutes. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/18 04:19 PM |
| 3 | A boy who underwent a botched circumcision in 1965 is forced and told he is a girl- almost resulting in a sex change.Sorry to hear- I can try finding the documentary somewhere else if you'd like. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/18 08:23 PM |
| 7 | A boy who underwent a botched circumcision in 1965 is forced and told he is a girl- almost resulting in a sex change.I'm not sure if this directly related to this sub but I thought that it was a horrifying example of botched circumcision and the resulting life men have afterward. As always, let me know if you have questions, suggestions, etc. Thanks everyone! | /r/MensRights | 01/03/18 05:41 PM |
| 16 | Dangerous double standards?No doubt! She's a straight shooter who's never has missed a shot. "It's wasn't learning about Men's issues that made me part feminism. It was actually learning about feminism that made me leave feminism." - Cassie Jaye | /r/MensRights | 24/02/18 05:56 AM |
| 1 | "Men, It's Time To Take A Risk - On Behalf Of Your Career"So is it safe to assume you failed the test- like me and likely hundreds of others? | /r/MensRights | 20/02/18 10:10 PM |
| 2 | "To Get Men on Our Side, Feminists Must Fight for Men Too: It may be the only way to get them to listen."Be sure to read the comment section- even if it's just a couple comments. A lot of the users make great points about the article/ topic in their comments. In fact, I only found one that really bites men- Abraxas writes: some men here would do better if we drag them kicking and screaming into 21st century or better yet, leave them in their dark ages, because you can't fix stupid | /r/MensRights | 19/02/18 02:19 PM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."How so? Either way, my point will stay the same. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 05:26 PM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."I think your missing the point- emotions and thoughts aren't universal- maybe I'm so angry one day that I throw a chair when I see my sandwich was eaten- meanwhile you may be happy somebody ate your not-so-great sandwich so you can have your friends extra one. We all feel and think in different ways- leading to our very different reactions to events. We are complex creatures without a clear answer to why we do what we do. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 06:45 AM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."I can't disagree there. But to say that we know that he was angry/full of resentment and that that was the motive is what I was meaning by my last reply. We can't say a box is red until we know that it's red or not. Unlike boxes, however, humans have complex reasons for things. Odd, stupid, I know- but it's a quick example of how easy it is to misjudge human responses and actions. That's when the psychologist and/or psychiatrist steps in to diagnosis it as a possible psychological issue- or a me… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 06:14 AM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."I've been giving it a read and I'm impressed by the amount of intelligence and effort put into your guys replies. Can you point me to a certain comment that you are referring to and/or believe could be informative to me? I'm confused on what you wanted me to learn. Thanks for the link. I can definitely agree with the post on a side note. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 02:39 AM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."...out of resentment and anger. The issue is that we must stand back as trusted psychologists and psychiatrists form that conclusion. They are trained to diagnosis and treat- we as the witness and/or victims are to simply report perpetrators. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 02:30 AM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."My question is- was that their intention? Personally, asking about what "was going through their head" at the time of the shootings is very significant to determining their goals and motives- which could answer this question. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 02:00 AM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."Very good point- I need to clear some things up- My apologies- as I am notorious for wording sentences very poorly and combining separate thoughts. Truthfully, I am not well-informed about mass-shootings and it's correlation with mental illness. I am informed, however, on violence and its correlation with mental illness. To put it simply, I think I mixed up/combined two separate ideas- violence and mass-shootings. What I have been taught through my studies is that while some violence is done by … | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 01:50 AM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."Yes. As far as I can tell these do not classify as mass school shootings. The federal government has defined mass shootings as "having four or more killed." Though, it's taken a looser definition over the years. Not many of those listed can be considered mass by this definition. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 12:57 AM |
| 0 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."No problem! The statistic is on page 1, first checked box under Evidence-Based Facts. References start on page 19. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/18 11:45 PM |
| 0 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."The claim that I would make is that while some mass shooters are mentally ill it has been proven time and time again that it makes up less than 2% of all mass shootings. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/18 11:28 PM |
| 2 | “Men who, through their sense of arrogance and entitlement, have hurt women and have not yet been made accountable." Thoughts?That is a very good point- thanks for bringing this to my attention! I had a very different perspective on this- had I seen it in a different light I would've been quick to notice it. Unfortunately, I can't change the title but I appreciate the suggestion. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/18 11:09 PM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."I guess I'm confused on the relevancy of these two sources? Not to say they aren't informative. If you care to elaborate I'm happy to listen. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/18 10:56 PM |
| 0 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."I'm very cautious to say this- but I can agree with you. Reason I am cautious is because of your evidence to back your claim. If anything I would make sure you can back your claim with reliable facts or statistics. The AMHCA did a phenomenal job with providing such if you want to take a peak. They actually made the same points as you- but further clarified on some common misunderstandings of the subject. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/18 10:30 PM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."Any chance you can give us some statistics and other evidence to back this? I can believe anything if I see statistics with reliable sources. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/18 09:55 PM |
| 1 | "Men Are Responsible for Mass Shootings: How toxic masculinity is killing us."Awesome post! Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/18 08:27 PM |
| 4 | “Men who, through their sense of arrogance and entitlement, have hurt women and have not yet been made accountable." Thoughts?This article is written by Lucy Rock of the Guardian. Here's another recent article of hers: "'Bikini baristas' in Washington are told to cover up – is it an issue of free speech?" As always- let me know what you think or if you have any suggestions! | /r/MensRights | 16/02/18 07:36 PM |
| 11 | My local newspaper decided to shine some light on our issueThe fact that the reporter wrote this article really goes to show how far men are willing to go to spread awareness of their struggles in this rather ignorant society. If we put our voices out there, I have hope that we can make a real difference for men everywhere, together. Thanks for sharing the article! | /r/MensRights | 14/02/18 05:48 AM |
| 3 | Male Circumcision statisticsThe decision rests with the parents to decide because of childrens' incompetency. I say if they choose to purposely harm the child for "medical reasons" there's a legal problem. It started as religious practice then has become this awful "medical" practice in order to prevent "problems." It's ridiculous to me, but I agree- if YOU CHOOSE to be circumcised- power to you. No one but you can make such a decision. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 08:34 PM |
| 6 | ‘Alabama teacher declares her constitutional right to have sex with students’Relax mate! I was joking with you- using sarcasm to explain how I feel about the use of '/s'- is this actually important to you or are you just messing with me? | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 08:10 PM |
| 2 | Male Circumcision statisticsBloody autocorrect- meant to say digging around. Thanks mate. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 06:51 PM |
| 1 | Male Circumcision statisticsI'm not sure what you mean to say- can you elaborate? | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 05:25 PM |
| 3 | Male Circumcision statisticsThanks for your opinion! I'll have to give it a read. The article's aim was to inform parents about circumcision but I admit that as I reread it I am confused about their direction- it is seemingly bias when it comes to performing circumcision- giving off rather negative information rather than positive. Either way, proving whether or not to perform circumcision was not the goal- rather, it was to help parents make an informed decision- hence why the website is called 'decision maker.' | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 05:24 PM |
| 8 | Male Circumcision statisticsThe article has taken a bias direction, but has not lied based upon their research. Here's the complete source as well as one experiment that the source refers to. This is their source for this quote. This is one experiment that the source referred to. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 05:13 PM |
| 95 | ‘Alabama teacher declares her constitutional right to have sex with students’What do you mean? I personally think that adding "/s" is very necessary and greatly benefits when reading the line! /s Edit: that was complete sarcasm. This is the complete opposite of what I believe about sarcasm. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 05:01 PM |
| 743 | ‘Alabama teacher declares her constitutional right to have sex with students’I was reading the comment section under the article when I found this brilliant quote by an annoymous user- As long as the change in the law is applied equally between the sexes… for true equality, after all. So let’s just wait until male teachers can have sex with 16yo girls; all hell will break loose!! We can’t have those evil patriarchal monsters preying on our young nubile schoolgirls and turning them into their personal sex slaves! Only sweet innocent MILFs are allowed to come in sexual con… | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 04:27 PM |
| 10 | These days, better have a Love Contract on hand...Season 2, episode 4. Aired on 2/11/2004. Happy watching. Edit: The skit is called Love Contract. The complete skit is actually on CC if you don't have the episode. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/18 02:20 PM |
| 3 | (women> men) + workplace = an bad idea according to USA TodayCompletely agree. If woman, for example, were more expensive than men, why would a company hire more woman? Businesses will always go for the cheaper option not because they're sexist or racist, but because they only have so much budget. Governments need to let businesses run their own course- laissez-faire. It's disgusting to see how businesses are being steered by the government- if this continues communism may become a less threatening and more beneficial system. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/18 01:55 PM |
| 3 | (women> men) + workplace = an bad idea according to USA TodayI appreciate you sharing your opinion, but I have to disagree with your reasoning. I do agree with going back to a more of a traditional marriage, but it's not because of societal standards. I was taught through the Bible that men were the "warriors" and woman were the "house keepers." Both, however, are equally important and deserve equal respect. This may not be a popular opinion, but it's one that I believe is both logical and compromising to both sides. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/18 01:46 PM |
| 2 | "Equal Opportunities: ... women make up 70%" of employees. Wow that's so equal! *clap*Lol. Same here mate. Guess tea is just tea in this case- | /r/MensRights | 11/02/18 05:36 AM |
| 3 | "Equal Opportunities: ... women make up 70%" of employees. Wow that's so equal! *clap*Essentially, Republic of Tea is a American based company that sells organic and exotic tea. Had to look it up. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/18 05:30 AM |
| 3 | "Have some f***ing manners, you’re speaking to a woman"I can't disagree with you there. I believe that todays society is in such fear of the female gender. By simply saying "[name] sexually abused me," a woman can ruin a man's life by threatening his job, financially with legal fees, etc. We have created this world of entitlement for woman out of our fear of their rising power. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/18 03:38 AM |
| 1 | It's 2018, You Should Know The Difference Between Sex And Gender: "Gender is a made-up term used throughout our society in order to group and categorize people." Feminist language and thought policing.What bothers me about this is that dictionaries haven't even changed their definitions. If the contributors of dictionaries- the one's who officially recognize meanings of words worldwide- have yet to change their definitions of the words "sex" and "gender," how can I accept the definitions that these feminists/SJWs come up with? They aren't officially recognized contributors of word etymology are they? Want proof they haven't changed? Here's Merriam-Webster's definition (which was even updated … | /r/MensRights | 07/02/18 05:20 AM |
| 1 | Let’s get rid of toxic assholeinity firstYou would be referring to the common feminists' of today definition of the word feminism. Merriam Webster actually defines it as the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes Britannica defines the word feminism similarly. the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes Ah, who am I kidding? We all know this, it's the bloody feminists that don't understand the real definitions. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/18 05:05 AM |
| 1 | Sex dolls banned in BotswanaSome questioned the ability of sex dolls to bear children, support the man and the home emotionally and do the house chores. Do the house chores? You have to be joking- Women have seriously complained about "belonging in a kitchen." Supporting the man? A lot of progress has been made so far regarding that for sure- Woman are calling us men "fucking misogynistic, sexist, assholes" now! | /r/MensRights | 07/02/18 04:55 AM |
| 3 | Sexual Preferences is Discrimination? Riley J Dennis on Politically ImpairedIt's pretty rare that you see someone stand up for themselves with such pride like you have with this reply- with an epic burn at the end, nonetheless. I applaud you. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/18 04:37 AM |
| 5 | "Have some f***ing manners, you’re speaking to a woman"I'm beginning to think that rules, policies, and more, are becoming trivial when it comes to woman's "rights." The players clearly told her that "we can't have you on the field for safety reasons." Yet she lashed out as if it infringed rights and discriminated against her. If the players clearly told her a rule and gave reasoning, I don't understand what would cause her to lash out. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/18 04:20 AM |
| 8 | Huffington Post: Male Circumcision is Not Mutilation, Period.For anyone who has an interest here's a article that has the stats on circumcision and mortality- Bollinger estimated that approximately 119 infant boys die from circumcision-related each year in the U.S. (1.3% of all male neonatal deaths from all causes). It also has a list of the recorded and published cases of circumcision-caused deaths around the world since 1910. Happy reading! | /r/MensRights | 07/02/18 03:54 AM |
| 1 | US Bureau of Labor Statistics evidence shows woman work more part-time jobs than menUPDATE: Be sure to check out the link. I'm having some conversations with r/feminism users and it's becoming a wee bit heated. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/18 04:50 PM |
| 2 | US Bureau of Labor Statistics evidence shows woman work more part-time jobs than menThanks for the read guys! I tried to make this unbiased as I wanted everyone to read it and make up their own minds. If you want to see something interesting, I actually posted this on r/feminism under the same title. The whole point with that was to see how the users took the article. I want to be clear that this post was not to offend anyone but to simply see what they thought of the data and analysis. This post started out with 3 votes and currently has 1 with 56% upvoted on the r/feminism. B… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/18 02:11 AM |
| 2 | Remember #bringbackourgirls? What about #bringbackour100000boys?Good clarification. Thanks! There's so many attacks reported that I'm confusing myself. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/18 08:33 PM |
| 2 | Remember #bringbackourgirls? What about #bringbackour100000boys?Both. If you look at pictures of the group you'll notice many of the members are male. However, CNN says that in February 2016, In another attack, two female suicide bombers kill 58 people at a Nigerian refugee camp for villagers fleeing terrorism. I agree, I'm confused on the relevance of this question as well. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/18 03:35 PM |
| 2 | Remember #bringbackourgirls? What about #bringbackour100000boys?I saw it first in the Red Pill, which is a phenomenal documentary about men's rights, and was shocked. I then decided to research it out and see if the woman who talks about this in the documentary was right and what her sources were. When I found all of this research, I decided to share it with you guys. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/18 03:27 PM |
| 1 | Remember #bringbackourgirls? What about #bringbackour100000boys?Thanks for the source! I love that last sentence. According to the BBC, the militants told the girls to flee, get married, and shun the western education which they were privy. That was the whole reason for the #bringbackourgirls. They were trying to address how they were forced to marry in the group and we're raped. Yet, they were released later on by the group? Head scratcher. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/18 03:21 PM |
| 3 | Remember #bringbackourgirls? What about #bringbackour100000boys?Here's the link to the Stanford article if you guys want to see what I'm talking about. Let me know if you want any of my other sources. http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/553?highlight=boko+haram | /r/MensRights | 22/01/18 04:39 AM |
| 5 | Remember #bringbackourgirls? What about #bringbackour100000boys?That's the problem. We too often see women going after men calling them "sexist, misogynistic, etc." I recently saw a video of a man walking into see a speaker, having to walk through an angry ranting crowd. As he goes inside, a woman is relentless in trying to destroy him emotionally, chanting those words, while he uttered not a single word back to her. How is this man any of those things when he said nothing, not even provoking her. Sad. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/18 01:14 AM |
| 1 | Debate Points. Research backed.I confused myself a lot in my latest reply, my apologies. My brains been working overtime in this conversation. (Trust me, that's a compliment, you're very intelligent over this topic.) I also apologize for my lack of knowledge of where you hail from. Had I done some research on your country I may be able to spit out a better conversation on my end. I think what's causing my confusion is I was raised in a different sociopolitical environment different country than yours. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/18 01:03 AM |
| 1 | Debate Points. Research backed.I'm not quite sure on a couple of things you wrote. On a side note: I misunderstood the context you were using when you said "get." No reason to be smart-aleck. 1) The government is never going to force you to reproduce. Expect a dystopia before the US government ever even asks us to reproduce. 2) I was trying to respectfully explain what I meant by responsibilities as you didn't seem to understand ( which could very well be my fault as I can be pretty vague.) 3) What has you thinking I want men… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/18 11:55 PM |
| 4 | Remember #bringbackourgirls? What about #bringbackour100000boys?When even scanning these articles talking about the boys you will find most are either tortured or trained. I haven't seen a article about the killing or burning of some of them. Do you have a link to your source for me to read? | /r/MensRights | 21/01/18 11:10 PM |
| 14 | Remember #bringbackourgirls? What about #bringbackour100000boys?Just a couple fun facts about my research in this topic: 1) Believe it or not, I took me twenty five minutes alone to even FIND a article mentioning "boys." 2) "Boys" are either not written about or , OR written off as "people." Even in a article written by Stanford a simple Find and Search for "boys" OR "boy" will not pop up ANY results. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/18 11:07 PM |
| 1 | Debate Points. Research backed.I feel that 3 is very underrated. It's basically saying we, as men, cannot be raped from a legal viewpoint. Thoughts? | /r/MensRights | 21/01/18 10:21 PM |
| 1 | Debate Points. Research backed.You're taking it very literally. The responsibilities I'm speaking about isn't a requirement but rather something you do out of appreciation and respect. Similar to how you can say "I did, [blank] gave [blank] for you, the least you can do is [blank]," you could say "I, the government, gave you [freedom], the least you can do is [serve/register for the military, for ex.]." "Get" children? Can you elaborate? | /r/MensRights | 21/01/18 10:05 PM |
| 0 | Debate Points. Research backed.While I agree with your reasoning, it would go against my beliefs for felons to vote. As a citizen, you are expected to take on the responsibilities of a citizen according to that country. One of the responsibilities of US citizens is to register for the Military Selective Service Act. If we do not follow and rather neglect our responsibilities, we do not deserve to be citizens and live freely. Responsibilities for freedom is a small price to pay for a beautiful purchase. The challenge lies with… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/18 09:15 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter