TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NewOrder777 Archive

View 4 posts and 86 comments by NewOrder777 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Women want to keep prostitution illegal because dry spells are what throw the dating market out of whack in their favor. When you're a slightly above average looking man going through a dry spell, you start looking at women you never would if there was a safe and legal hooker option. Women enjoy punching out of their league, but overall it hurts everyone to keep prostitution illegal. Thots exaggerrate their own value, men dive into the dumpster. Bad for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 07:37 PM
2

LOL. So sex isn't a human right (for men), but having sex without any consequences (which is what abortion and birth control are all about) is. Typical feminist thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 07:35 PM
0

So in other words, being altruistic is a good way to scare off gold diggers. Good tip.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 07:41 PM
2

We'll give women the benefit of the doubt when they stop talking about how they want altruistic and gentle men while their browser is full of extreme BDSM rape porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 07:39 PM
2

Generally it's something sociopaths and people who lack empathy engage in. These traits are a lot more attractive to women than people are comfortable admitting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 07:38 PM
–

Actually they are. Because the testament to reciprocal value is whether these men commit to them for a LTR, which they usually do not. Women feel used/like they can't get long term relationships and it frustrates them. The majority of men not having sex or dating in this dynamic are also frustrated. It's not about "fair" or some stupid nietzchean power struggle. Nobody wins. The women end up cat ladies . Expect female suicide to go through the roof once Millennial women start getting into their …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 07:11 PM
1

All of this is addressed in the article. You must be one of those leftists who believes penis' are a social construct.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/17 01:08 AM
2

A man who is a 6 is lucky if he gets laid even once a year outside of a relationship. Even finding a woman to have a relationship with is an uphill task for most men under 8.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 08:20 PM
4

You're probably a woman and so you are projecting. Or your definition of attractive is like, literally talking about a famous movie star that is hot to women right now. The number of men who can will getting laid any night of the week without paying for it is in the single digits no matter how hard he tries.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 09:24 AM
1

Most blue pillers are women, or men who were born into men and are in the top tier of looks. It's the same demographic that votes for leftist policies like more refugees. They're naive people who have a bubble of privilege shielding them from the negative consequences of their wrong beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 07:56 AM
9

This is a blatant lie. NYC isn't the pussy paradise some people think it is. There's a lot more good looking women than average, but the competition is way more fierce. I'm sure LA is the same. If we're talking just getting laid with anything with a pulse, a semi-good looking guy probably has a better chance at a small town bar than in NYC.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 07:07 AM
1

Without paying for it? 5-10% if they live in an urban area.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 07:05 AM
3

I agree with this too actually. Especially since there are so many "PUAs" out there that they often here the same pick up line and trick over and over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 07:04 AM
4

Nobody is blaming the women. More power to them. It's the men who are the problem. They're probably in some debt and afraid of losing half their money.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 07:03 AM
3

Any study that depends on either men or women self-reporting their sex partners is faulty. Men inflate their numbers, women deflate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 02:54 AM
9

I feel sorry for men who are truly alone. There are many men who, thanks to modern women, grow up in single mom/divorcee households, without male role models, without direction or inspiration for life. Then they use what they know to connect with women and get chewed out and ruthlessly shut down, with nobody telling them the truth as to why that is. But that is where my sympathy and empathy ends. Men who enable women (white knights) really disgust me. Inner Betas like Pierce Brosnan and Hugh Jac…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 12:22 AM
8

It's such a false equivalence. Women adding n's is like taking candy from a baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 12:09 AM
1

I am probably a 5 to 7 (on a good day) for a man and as I approach 30, I don't plan on dating or marrying women in my age group. I will probably end up leaving the country to find a wife once I get enough cash. There are a lot of "Mr. Good Enough" men like myself who feel the same. Women are counting on us to be around when they finally decide to stop doing blow and having sex with night club bouncers in bathrooms. But I'd rather die alone than marry a woman who has had more sexual partners than…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 11:16 PM
2

I've been kind for all my life in a number of contexts, and not in the "nice guy" way (towards the elderly, towards people in need, not expecting anything in return). It has never helped me with women that weren't physically attracted to me from the start. On the other hand, I have a nasty and mean side to me, which women have a habit of bringing out in me. Most women that are physically attracted to me stay physically attracted, and actually, some women who initially were not into me start look…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 10:57 PM
1

Women don't usually find men more attractive as they get to know them, unless the men were already on the cusp and they find out something about them (like the man has a large penis, is wealthy, is extra cool or masculine, etc). But this applies to men that are in the 25th percentile, not quite top 20% but women will make an "exception" if you're close enough and have an extraordinary hidden quality. If what you are saying is true for the most part, the friend zone wouldnt exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 10:52 PM
1

I agree that men would look at women very differently if they knew how few men even make the cut of romantic prospect in their eyes. Most of it is based on physical features that can't be changed, or money issues that are hard to change (at least in your 20s). Even if you do "make it" financially, nobody wants a woman that only wants him for his money. There is already something to this effect going on right now. A lot of men are really angry about women, far more than 10 years ago when I was th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 10:37 PM
5

I bet if you went off something other than self-reported surveys, the average 25 year old woman would have more sex partners than the average 25 year old man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 11:35 PM
1

They don't want it less. They want it just as bad and are willing to go through all types of humiliation and risk-taking to get it. There are just way way way fewer men that meet their physical criteria for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 10:17 PM
4

Any woman under 35 telling you she's never had casual sex is lying to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 08:55 PM
1

The women here posting that females aren't viscerally and lustfully attracted to a man at first sight are lying. The question is whether it's to themselves or to look good. The main difference between men and women is that women's standard for this kind of attraction is muich higher than mens. A man will often start getting sloppy over a nice pair of tits or a shapely ass, regardless of the women's other features. To elicit this kind of reaction from women you must be over 6'0, be very well buil…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 08:47 PM
1

Yeah, maybe in species where the females are bigger or stronger. Women throughout history have been property of men. They would still be if it weren't for a government propped up by billionaires with big armies. If we're going to take a genetic or natural deterministic point of view, women's taste in men are irrelevant in humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 04:58 AM
1

For the same reason ordinary men in America date heinous women an average man from Ukraine or even South Korea would immediately vomit when seeing. Society changed. The dating market in Anglo-Saxon countries is 100% in favor of women. It's not about genetics. If I live in a nation full of attractive women like say, Belarus, I'm not going to notice the few less attractive women. In America, those less attractive Belarussian girls would be like the last gatorade in the desert.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 03:58 AM
1

yeah unless you're a female with bad genes. If this was really about natural eugenics, just as many women would be overlooked as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 03:49 AM
1

I agree with you to half way, but why the "I know a short ugly guy who gets girls" cliche? I know one too. But if I were to leave out the important caveat that he was a cocaine dealer, it would be dishonest. I think there is some nuance. Say, a 5'8 man isn't attractive to women but can improve his prospects with attitude, confidence humor and a good body. 5'7 needs more of it, 5'6 even more, once you're getting into 5'4 territory its understandable why some think it is impossible. Especially if …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 03:25 AM
3

Occasionally a skinny short guy with those traits can get a chick in her 30's whose all used up for a relationship, maybe. What Red Pill is selling is getting the best pussy before it expires. The guys I see having casual sex with a lot of women (including the ones who later date men for their personality after "sowing their oats") can be total irreedemable dirtbags, imbeciles, or great people. But the only thing they have in common is that they are physically attractive, have superficial status…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 03:12 AM
4

I think women had a more nuanced sense of attraction because they had to. If I took the average "won't date a man under 6'0" modern woman and put her on an island alone with a guy that is 5'8, she could very well end up falling in love with him. If we lived on a society where women were expected to be monogamous and marry young, the same is true. But if she has her own money and a (real or imagined) abundance mentality, she feels that is "settling" and usually winds up the loser herself. If wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 06:22 PM
4

Not long ago (I'm talking even 10 years ago) an average man could get at least one woman to look at him like that. Nowadays because of a lot of social factors, women fixate all their lust and desire to maybe 1 out of 10 men. The fact that 20 something women make more money than 20-something men basically makes 80+ % of men invisible unless they can really visually stimulate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 05:59 PM
2

Proof of what?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 01:29 AM
1

Most rapists are high testosterone Incels. I'm talking about actual rape, not the new fake rape of banging a drunk chick.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 12:14 AM
4

That is a bunch of bullshit and probably written by a woman. Most of the men who are social and fun to be around end up in the friend zone if they're not sexually (read: physically) attractive or rich. If you really put in the effort to look your absolute best, you might get something, but its still going to be pulling teeth to get laid and you'll get lucky to bed 1 or 2 chicks a year at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 12:02 AM
1

Women aren't afraid of strangers if they have a six pack and are 6'3. The truth is you are probably not exceptionally attractive, so women don't want to interact with you in their day to day lives. Stranger danger is just the alibi.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 09:35 PM
1

Men have one night stands with women they're not attracted to all the time. A woman having a one night stand isn't the same as a man finding it, since it requires 0 effort, women don't even need to be attractive to have casual sex. For men, ONS generally requires aiming down in your SMV, just like prostitution for women. Men do it to scratch an itch, women do it to get paid. Women can find whoremongers unattractive, but men find women who have one night stands and high-n counts as unacceptable f…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 07:08 PM
3

There is no moral, emotional or hygenic difference between a man who uses prostitutes and a woman who has one night stands. The only distinction is that the woman having ONS is more likely to have STDs and abortions because they don't always use condoms. A decent hooker always does. The only real difference is socially constructed. In our feminist society women are allowed to behave however they want and expect to be above consequences and judgement. They naturally don't extend that to men. But …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 08:46 PM
5

Don't listen to the women here. You have a better chance wearing the 4 (or 6) inch lifts (inside your shoes) as a 5'8-5'10 man who woes a woman and has a chance to have her look past your 5'4 after you bang her than you do at 5'4 "being yourself" where you will be pretty much invisible. These same women tack on everything from fake eyelashes to push ups to increase in their SMV and nobody says anything to them. Now women date men primarily for their looks but claim they don't like men who try an…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/17 06:52 PM
1

Is the DS a red pill site? Yes. Now I'm sure you'll pull the typical Leftist trick and use that for guilt by association. But before you do, did you know that feminism was made up in the Soviet Union, where its supporters murdered millions?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 05:55 PM
4

I've been in a number of relationships and seen others play out. It always goes the same way. I can always tell you which relationship is in the greatest danger just by looking at the people in question for a minute. When the woman is better looking than the man, he better not ever lose his job or have a man who is better looking eagerly pursue his woman, because then it's curtains.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 06:02 PM
2

That's the mentality of most women nowadays. Which is why men should never close off all their options and feast when there's food.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 05:50 PM
4

This is such bullshit. Women would much rather be the pump and dump of a man who is of higher SMV than them than be in a committed relationship with a man of equal value who is great to them. If it wasn't true, there wouldn't be single people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 05:47 PM
4

This is an interesting Point of view. I live in an elite coastal city and what women call average is exactly who you describe here. I am reluctant to go deep into the US. From what I hear, it's even worse there because the women are less attractive but just as entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 05:44 PM
3

Very few men approach models exclusively, and when it happens, its done with low expectations and for laughs. In fact, it's much more likely a good looking man will approach ugly women during a night out.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 05:42 PM
5

Things in the last couple of years have gotten way worse for men. Men are getting more and more competitive for lower and lower quality women in America. Investing in yourself has dwindling ROI (in regards to women) as time goes on in this time in history. Nobody will study this because it is politically incorrect to try and figure out the reality of a problem disproportionately impacting men. I've noticed a huge explosion in incel types that talk about "chad" all day and night. It's not just is…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 05:39 PM
2

I always laughed at this dichotomy myself. Women don't offer any incentive to be in a long-term relationship with them, and get surprised when men don't like it that they give certain types of guys easy sex while making others have to pass Saw style masochistic exercises just for a poke at their used up pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 10:14 AM
1

If women were actually honest about how they categorize men, and how fragile and fickle their love for a man (or even a female friend) is, there would be a massive backlash. Most men know how women are, even blue pills know in the back of their minds. They're just holding out for that rare woman that "isn't like that". They're going to be sorely disappointed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 09:33 AM
5

It's a question based on a non-existent scenario. Women only have casual sex with men they see as significantly superior to them, and LTR's with men that they perceive as inferior beta males. No female 10 is going to just randomly fuck me at a bar unless I pay her to.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 09:26 AM
3

That's more common among boomers. I don't see it so much in the under 35 crowd. Dating women is such a headache that a woman that can cook and isn't a borderline personality instagram whore shit-testing you 24/7 is an incredible catch no matter what she looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 09:25 AM
3

Any woman can be a "hot bitch" with some dieting and exercise and some make up. You're just lazy, and you know what, you still get men you don't deserve asking you out. Very few men can be hot to women no matter what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 09:23 AM
5

How men and women classify a ONS vs a LTR is drastically different. The women I'd invest in for the long-haul are much fewer than the ones I'd bang for a night. The women I'd pump and dump are always far inferior in quality (often due to their personalities, most very good looking women are attention whores with BPD), and like most men, we don't generally respect or care about them. This is in contrast to women, who are disgusting sluts but for a very small group of men. The men they have LTR wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 09:19 AM
3

Women really love to engage in this type of childish cruelty. That's only because they know it's politically incorrect for men to treat them in kind. When that changes, and men start anticipating women's bullshit by mocking their looks, they'll quickly learn their lesson.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 09:14 AM
1

A man has authority and clout over his daughter from birth and arguably (to some degree) til he dies. Meanwhile, no matter how strong or dominant I am, I don't have as much power over how a woman that isn't related to me acts. You have to take on certain ugly personality traits in order to compete with the modern sociopathic woman (who are the majority), it doesn't mean you want your kids to contribute to the ugliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 09:00 AM
16

That isn't true. Give me a 6 who is loyal and submissive and is madly in love with me over a 10 who isn't. Hell, I'll take the 6 with the great personality over a 10 with a good personality. The dirty secret is no woman would accept the reverse nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 08:55 AM
5

I don't know who could ever believe such tripe. Personality for men today matters less than probably ever before in history. It's not even just that women have gotten more shallow about looks. Their brains are so worn out from social media, smart phones and 24/7 stimulation that they don't even have the attention span to get to know and fall in love with a man anymore. Or watch a good movie, or read a deep book. Which is why men aren't cultivating themselves culturally as much as before. We are …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 08:52 AM
3

I think political violence in the US is coming soon for the same reasons it is so rife in the Middle East. Islam is the ostensible excuse, but the big problem is massive unemployment among young men which leads to lack of access to women for marriage. When you have neither a job nor a family, you have nothing to lose and any alternative sounds better. You can already see some tastes of this conflicts in the US. You got red pill Alt-Right types ,who are a combination of nerdy incels (a group that…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 08:49 AM
2

Women aren't marrying for money as much in the under 40 crowd. Now, they've gotten used to dating men based primarily on looks or novelties, and end up perpetually branch swinging due to artificially engineered abundance mentality. A lot of men are also marrying less attractive women who have money so they can mooch off of them. The economy right now is squeezing men out of the middle class, and if you're better looking than a woman, they won't mind you not having money and will treat you like a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 08:36 AM
3

Most men are not going out on dates, having sex or getting married, and for the most part, this is involuntary. The difference between most men and incels is most just channel their energy into other pursuits or just lie so people won't judge them as losers. Every study into the matter focuses entirely on the female point of view, and blames the lack of romantic relationships on men being unwilling to commit, which is bullshit. Looking at it from the male POV would be groundbreaking social scien…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 10:01 PM
1

It's just never happened, and it's not going to. Women aren't open to this anymore. Next best thing is becoming extremely muscular and dating a woman with inferior sexual value. They'll treat you like a god and subsidize your peter pan lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 05:24 PM
2

Women do exactly what men would do with their advantage: constantly trade up. They just lie about it and put the blame on the man they betray. Which is why the solution is to create a system of sexual checks and balances to encourage long term pairing and protect men who invest in women from hypergamy. Society can't survive the rapidly increasing number of single-mothers and divorced, alienated men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 03:26 AM
0

Alpha males know on some level that women aren't equal to men and never will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 07:29 PM
1

Date is the wrong word. A woman might actually get married to a "nice guy" if she's in her late 20's or 30's and he has money. The update to the Red Pill maxim is "don't listen to what they say, watch who they fuck." IF you want to get a lot of pussy, becoming a crazy meth smoking biker will get you more, better looking etc sexual opportunities than white collar profession.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 07:27 PM
2

The new value is that getting laid is the ultimate achievement. Women reward men with psychopathic tendencies with sex. So many men who otherwise aren't psychopaths, will pretend to be because it gives them an edge in the market.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 04:34 AM
8

Not easier. That men have any chance at online dating at all. With more women staying in and OLD becoming increasingly normalized, this is turning into a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 03:27 AM
–

I dont know who that is. I'm not the best looking in the world but im not ugly either.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 03:21 AM
3

Unless you have pics of them in front of a Ferrari or a Yacht, not with any pictures.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 03:17 AM
0

You probably have something unusually good that is obvious in your photos/profile (money, status, or a shirtless 6 pack picture) , or you're one of those guys who goes to an 80% female college and are picking up women way below your league. Male success largely depends on where you are and who you are next to more than anything about your personality or even confidence. At least when it comes to getting your foot in the door (confidence only opens it wider, it doesn't get you in).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 03:16 AM
–

Actually, take away the photoshop, crappy facial hair and professional photo style and that guy looks somewhat like me. And I still don't get much on either OKC or Tinder. Been using OKC off and on and a year and haven't even gotten a date on there yet, LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 03:14 AM
1

Women care a lot more about money as an object than men do. Men only care about the status and women that comes with having money, but aren't nearly as materialistic (there are exceptions of course).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 03:09 AM
1

I have pretty vicious rape fantasies, but would obviously never act on them. I can't stand the disgusting culture around BDSM either and am not into like beating people with canes or burning them, so I don't partake in it in my life or when I date women (though I do do lighter dominant stuff with them). I keep it to myself. A girlfriend years ago once told me, unsolicited, that she fantasized about me raping her, and wanted me to be rough with her. I asked her to be sure, and she told me "not to…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 03:07 AM
2

Modern courtship is new and artificial. Women are wired to submit to whoever is tough or sneaky enough to take down the opposition and run off with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 03:02 AM
3

You have no idea what you're talking about. I am on Tinder and swipe everyone and get few if any matches, and not one date yet (two women got close, loved talking to me, then flaked). I am a totally normal looking guy, at least I think I am, and even women below my league won't even burp in my direction. Online dating is a totally one-sided affair in favor of women. Like I said, go see for yourself! Even the most obese, ugliest women on OkCupid won't respond to those average looking men you put …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 02:49 AM
2

Same here. I could send people on here some of my pics in private if they don't believe me. I look way better than both of those guys, machine swipe all the profiles I can, and while I do occasionally get a decent match, the women don't respond, much less meet. I have not been able to meet anyone on tinder at all using it for months. And I live in NYC, supposedly a mecca for "single women."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 02:46 AM
3

Neither of those men would get any matches that turn into lays on Tinder unless they go for the trannies and crossdressers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 02:43 AM
2

Typical woman who doesn't know what she's talking about. Any man who gets laid on Tinder is above average looking and going after women that are either on the lower side of average or even below average. I would go farther than most guys and actually dare you to make a tinder with a GOOD looking guy. Not Adonis with a 6 pack who is 6'5 and is posing shirtless with his Porsche, but just an every day guy who is handsome enough. You might get a match or two if you swipe absolutely everyone. If you …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 02:42 AM
2

Average man can do it if: 1) He is at least 5'8, though much more likely at 5'11 and up. 2) He has a high paying job women like (firefighter, pilot, etc). 3) He approaches every woman he sees indiscriminately. 4) He aims for women below his league .
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 02:39 AM
1

Lack of sexual opportunities combined with lower levels of restraint/intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 08:33 PM
2

Women think the average man sleeps with 2 new women every month because they only see like 5% of men. 95% of men are invisible to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 09:11 PM
2

You can keep relying on Evo Psy all you want. Any society where 90% of the men have little to no access to women will collapse. Most women don't care about these "MGTOWs", but they will care when all the men drop out of society and there's no tax money left for the hospitals and elementary schools that employ most independent middle class women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 08:21 PM
2

Maybe you're right. But the amount of men who have any kind of success on tinder and dating in general keeps going down. It's not even 20%, it's like 5-10%.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 06:02 PM
2

I agree with you 100%. Surprised how many men are in our situation. I'm willing to bet you're not some freak, basement dweller or weirdo either.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 06:01 PM
1

People who talk about "misogyny" and "white privilege" are doing it for doggy treats. In the real world these opinions are held by very few people, but many will pay lip service to it because it gets you kudos from the new aristocracy (celebrities, rich people, politicians, academics, etc). The people who talk about that stuff tend to be women and low testosterone men, because of the instinct to be hyper-conformist.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 01:17 AM
1

That's just sad. Yet more incentives to women to put off meaningful commitment for another decade on the cock carousel. I bet despite women having kids later, the rates of single mom-dom are way higher. Where's the CDC statement on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 01:07 AM
2

I want to add that Tinder and the way dating is working right now is going to lead to some serious backlash from men. I get women that would be great matches sending me unsolicited likes on, say, OkCupid, then I message them and theres no response. I used to think it was that my messages were garbage, and I don't take rejection personally (it's part of the game), but I don't think it's me. It's that a woman might see a guy she likes, but 5 minutes later, an even better guy messages her. In perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 11:33 PM
2

I've been using Tinder off and on for 2 months. Have about 30 matches, some of them good looking, but I used an app that matches everyone (no chance of getting a match as a man without one, unless you are in the top 1%). Two women who were way below average messaged me first. Most don't respond. There are supposedly a lot of women in my area. Tinder is a waste of time for men. Trying to meet women in general is becoming more and more of a waste of time requiring more and more ridiculous investme…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 11:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter