TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NibblyPig Archive

View 45 posts and 2,064 comments by NibblyPig on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
525

Social IssuesNibblyPig/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:14 PM
228

DiscriminationNibblyPig/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:51 AM
148

NibblyPig/r/MGTOW20/01/20 12:50 PM
134

NewsNibblyPig/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:26 AM
131

Social IssuesNibblyPig/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:52 PM
116

Legal RightsNibblyPig/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:23 PM
110

Social IssuesNibblyPig/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:24 AM
102

Social IssuesNibblyPig/r/MensRights14/02/17 09:39 AM
97

DiscriminationNibblyPig/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:05 PM
89

Activism/SupportNibblyPig/r/MensRights24/07/19 05:25 AM
86

OpinionNibblyPig/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:01 PM
74

DiscriminationNibblyPig/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:57 PM
72

Fathers/CustodyNibblyPig/r/MensRights15/12/15 04:14 PM
70

QuestionNibblyPig/r/MensRights02/03/15 12:00 PM
65

Activism/SupportNibblyPig/r/MensRights01/07/19 10:34 AM
64

NibblyPig/r/MensRights22/01/16 05:55 PM
60

Edu./Occu.NibblyPig/r/MensRights08/11/19 08:04 AM
54

Social IssuesNibblyPig/r/MensRights24/09/18 07:35 AM
54

FeminismNibblyPig/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:00 PM
52

GeneralNibblyPig/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:12 PM
52

ProgressNibblyPig/r/MensRights22/01/18 11:13 PM
46

Legal RightsNibblyPig/r/MensRights18/07/15 10:30 PM
39

Activism/SupportNibblyPig/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:45 PM
37

Social IssuesNibblyPig/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:59 AM
25

FeminismNibblyPig/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:37 PM
22

False AccusationNibblyPig/r/MensRights15/07/20 12:04 PM
21

DiscussionNibblyPig/r/MensRights20/12/14 10:40 AM
19

Social IssuesNibblyPig/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:36 PM
16

NibblyPig/r/MensRights21/12/15 08:21 PM
15

NibblyPig/r/askTRP29/01/17 10:16 PM
13

Social IssuesNibblyPig/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:47 AM
9

Social IssuesNibblyPig/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:14 AM
9

Social IssuesNibblyPig/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:02 PM
9

NibblyPig/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:06 PM
7

NibblyPig/r/askTRP27/02/18 08:17 PM
4

NibblyPig/r/askTRP15/08/16 09:01 AM
3

QuestionsNibblyPig/r/MensRights07/02/17 06:36 PM
2

QuestionNibblyPig/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:35 AM
2

NibblyPig/r/askTRP18/12/16 05:48 PM
2

NibblyPig/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:26 PM
1

DiscriminationNibblyPig/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:09 AM
1

NibblyPig/r/askTRP24/12/16 03:41 PM
1

DiscriminationNibblyPig/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:13 AM
1

DiscriminationNibblyPig/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:11 AM
0

NibblyPig/r/MensRights15/12/14 01:41 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,064 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think you have a point on the apps, but meeting people is very hard in a scenario where it might lead to a date. It happens if you're constantly around the same people, ie friend groups or work. I reckon the fastest way to find a partner is probably to get a job in McDonald's lol
/r/MensRights29/06/26 06:40 AM
15

You say some stuff doesn't bother him but it bothers you. Thats because it can't bother him. If he shows it does he's an incel and part of the manosphere, can't get laid, mysoginist etc. He can't express dissatisfaction because society will punish him for it. Don't be surprised if it bothers him more than you think.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 07:53 AM
16

Maybe we can fix our birth rate by forcing women to have children for the good of the country? Makes you think.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 02:10 AM
3

The ol' No True Scotsman Feminist argument
/r/MensRights15/10/25 10:29 PM
60

"My alone feels so good" Ok, so you don't need to complain about it then, right? Right? Or is this just cope because the only guys you ever date are those who come to you, and guys that come to you are more often than not, absolute trash tier humans.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 03:39 PM
1

The only thing that these men have in common is that they all approached you, rather than you approaching them
/r/MensRights12/08/25 08:48 PM
7

Makes the old Facebook hot or not style thing look positively tame
/r/MensRights29/07/25 07:01 AM
2

Just let them discredit themselves tbh, better to just distance yourself and highlight that they're a bunch of angry feminist idiots than showing any respect or acknowledgement of them
/r/MensRights14/07/25 11:55 AM
2

No, it's better to write off the UN, their hypocrisy is obvious. You don't have to get everyone to like you. Just treat them as a waste of space joke of an institution and move on to better things
/r/MensRights13/07/25 11:33 AM
5

Pointless, the UN is a lost cause. I guarantee if they implement it it will be about ways we can recognise men can do more for women and help them with the sexism and harassment they do to women all the time. It will not be a victory
/r/MensRights13/07/25 10:41 AM
38

birth rate in freefall, wonder why...
/r/MensRights06/07/25 02:56 PM
34

"Sorry, thought you were going back with the guy you were passionately making out with"
/r/MensRights06/07/25 03:02 AM
-1

He was allegedly abusive and violent which contributed to the decision, you are correct.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 10:58 PM
-6

Well they do their job, or they get fired. But until society stops simping then it makes sense to hire attractive women.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 09:21 PM
-10

Absolutely and if I were hiring for people-facing roles I'd hire entirely attractive women as well.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 05:24 PM
9

Psychological castration is what they want. Might as well cut young boys balls off, a lot quicker and cheaper to get what they want.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 08:40 PM
11

That's what society wants though, for every guy to be a soggy harmless soyboy, apart from their boyfriend. Just like the uk media pushing this TV series about a violent boy, gotta tell the boys and girls that boys are violent, little timmy can't possibly grow up without fully understanding he's a little monster.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 03:56 PM
2

Never understand the term pick me. Making yourself desirable to the opposite sex so you can have a healthy relationship? Approaching issues and challenges 50/50? Making sure they're happy while they make sure you're happy? Truly terrible!
/r/MensRights20/03/25 03:55 PM
26

You get compensation from the judicial system if you report you were raped, as a woman, even if it's later disproven.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 04:52 PM
19

Nah I've got this great solution to these problems. The problems are caused by men, right? So what if we just blamed men some more? I think that will definitely work guys!
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:38 PM
8

Yeah, not sure where to go though
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:37 PM
19

I thought it was the opposite, because having a partner meant they were more likely to notice when something was wrong. I remember when I was younger my mum said to my dad a mole on his back appeared to have grown, and he went to the docs and they said yeah that's not good, and cut it out. Big ass scar.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 12:44 AM
8

The real question is why is HR bigger than one person
/r/MensRights28/01/25 09:29 PM
13

Hopefully the additional charges will be filed as those are probably the only ones that will do anything
/r/MensRights27/01/25 08:38 PM
11

Taking 100 dicks at once, exploitative, poor woman, etc. Taking 100 dicks at a rate of 5 a week, you go girl empowered sex worker sex work is real work clapping emoji
/r/MensRights16/12/24 11:31 AM
20

Somewhat entitled if you think others should change their comments to appease your sensibilities.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 08:14 AM
5

There are zero raping females. Because the law says they can't do it. So of course men are the majority, it's all men. Are they the actual majority if the law was equal? We don't know. And it'd be wrong to assume.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 12:48 AM
6

Emotional fairness not empirical fairness though, sadly.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:17 PM
3

How can you possibly for a second think that men don't collaborate as well when they run and built everything. We are literally designed by evolution to form a natural dominance/competence hierarchy to work together.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 09:15 PM
1

Thanks, I'll probably move abroad and try my luck in a more traditional country.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 08:57 AM
1

That's fine but I'd like kids really
/r/MensRights09/08/24 08:15 AM
5

If your advice is taken literally, the answer to how do you find a partner is, 'you don't'. But I assume that you were talking to all the people who were looking for a partner thinking that they hadn't already done all of the basic stuff first, like learn to be complete. It's good advice, but it's not a complete solution.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 10:39 PM
15

It's well meaning but it's a numbers game. And most people who are older simply don't interact with enough new people to meet one they might hit it off with. I have everything in life apart from a partner. I have more money than I can spend, I'm learning two languages, doing other random hobbies, travelling anywhere I feel like going, I'm perfectly content in all ways except for having a partner. The only way to achieve this is to meet more women in any setting. There isn't really any way to do …
/r/MensRights08/08/24 09:09 PM
8

Sometimes I work from a coffee shop, and I sit in the pleasant garden, sipping my latte and tapping on my laptop, and around me 90% of the patrons are women having a day out with their friends, couple of kids in tow, or just old and retired people. Likely because all the guys are hard at work and can't go sit in a lovely coffee shop. Then when divorce comes along, the guy has to pay her because it's so unfair that she is behind on her career while he's been basking in the glory of being a wage s…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:32 PM
10

Not the attraction part, or the risk of losing so much. Just have a relationship but don't get married, simples.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:18 PM
23

I fully disagree, most men outearn women and stand to lose a considerable amount in a divorce. In addition, a large part of attraction towards men is that they have options, if they are perceived as someone that other women want, then it makes them more attractive. When a guy gets married it can severely diminish this perception and make him a lot more unattractive. Look at how many deadbedrooms occur after marriage. I don't understand the rest of your post. I live alone and I cook, clean, take …
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:13 PM
39

You're not hot enough that I'd jump your bones, but you bring me many other benefits that I enjoy and would love to lock down. Guys want to know their partner is really into them for who they are, not for what they can provide
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:53 PM
52

That's very noble, but it comes across as I'd fuck that guy just because he's so hot that I don't even need anything else from him, but this guy I'd be delighted if he provided for me my whole life, he'd be such a great catch, but if he couldn't do that then I wouldn't really be interested in fucking him.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:35 PM
2

The trauma just resonates off the page
/r/MensRights08/08/24 09:33 AM
42

How could the patriarchy make her do this
/r/MensRights06/08/24 09:04 PM
1

Yes, because her sponsors said you apologise or we pull your funding. She wants to be able to compete again next Olympics, that unfortunately means pandering. Hope that clears it up, moron. Don't forget to address my other points.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 01:21 PM
2

It's this kind of thing but it's the fact that women listen to other women, so if a woman has a bad experience, she will want to tell other women and other women will want to listen. Only now every single woman in the world is connected and so instead of knowing 30 people in your village and the worst thing you're gonna hear is gossip from a few of them about a bad man which would make the women uneasy (until the guy was caught) women now know 3 million women in their 'village' (their online lif…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 06:16 PM
2

Hmm I think you are right and I judged too harshly in this instance
/r/MensRights02/08/24 05:11 PM
-2

Previous fights when? Imane Khelif hasn't lost a bout since 2022. Even I could go into the ring with some low ranked female boxers I expect and win with minimal training. The fact someone loses because they're amateur and inexperienced doesn't mean that it's fair. Once they trained up enough their skill and natural strength means that they're basically unstoppable. The whole willingly chose thing is somewhat bullshit, you don't just start training for the olympics a few weeks before after checki…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 05:05 PM
1

I think they are 'trans' if trans means having the if you disagree with his classification at birth as being female, which given the ridiculous strength, body composition, and chromones seems like a fair cop I think that the argument is really about their biological strength. I think they have the physiology of a man for the purposes of sports and therefore that should exclude them. I understand why they'd be categorised with trans people for that reason. However I changed my mind and I think th…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 04:59 PM
2

Not really, words only have a limited scope until you get into specifics. Like, we all agree a banana is a fruit. We agree this because it's useful to categorise fruits. For 99.9% of every day conversations, a banana being understood as a fruit is very helpful and works perfectly fine. It's only when you need to discuss the super specifics that we say okay we need to be more precise than that. So we can say men have a penis and women have a vagina and that's a solid definition that works 99% of …
/r/MensRights02/08/24 04:57 PM
17

‘It’s as if, just by being a man, I’m predatory until proven otherwise. So I glance at her, and only if she responds strongly and positively for more than a few seconds back, do I dare go over to her and ask if she’d like a drink.’ Don't worry, all the men that haven't been completely cucked by society, the real assholes and abusers that don't give a shit about women's feelings, absolutely don't care one jot about these stupid rules. They'll approach women, get rejected, and won't even bat an ey…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:40 PM
17

Not everybody argues from an emotional state. Also in general men acknowledge their emotions but don't let themselves be controlled by them.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 09:27 AM
-3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender
/r/MensRights16/07/24 03:46 PM
1

When it comes to murders and violence, men are top, because we're built to be dominant and aggressive. But that doesn't mean all men are dominant and aggressive, or that it manifests with criminal violence. We shouldn't be afraid of any particular demographic because only a minority of people within that demographic are dangerous.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 03:22 PM
2

Feminists trying to say it's always men that commit these crimes therefore men can't be trusted. I agree that it's almost always men that do these crimes. But the phrase should really be "not all men but always a bad man" to approach the truth of it. Because good men don't commit crimes, just bad ones. It's as pointless as saying not all humans but always a human.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 10:37 AM
4

Spot on! :)
/r/MensRights12/07/24 04:40 PM
9

Who knows, you're just as likely to see a story about a wife upset that the husband is getting fitter in the gym
/r/MensRights12/07/24 11:27 AM
2

Upload an AI generated image if you want to try it. Or find a photo on google images of someone like a famous celebrity from an obscure country.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 11:07 AM
5

If I can smell em first, I have a pretty good ability to determine what choices in life would be good for me and what wouldn't. Of course, I could just ignore the warning signs and be a slave to my emotions... but there'd be consequences
/r/MensRights08/07/24 04:35 PM
2

Well movies are sexist towards women aren't they
/r/MensRights30/06/24 06:30 PM
16

Which of those three things applies?
/r/MensRights30/06/24 06:56 AM
7

In the UK you get automatic compensation from the crown regardless of whether it was true
/r/MensRights27/06/24 08:06 AM
2

It generally is, however there are exceptions for things where a role needs to be a man or a woman specifically. For example, casting someone in a play/movie. A strip club and hooters are both entertainment venues where people go to see women 'perform', therefore they can choose their performers accordingly. Whether that would stand up in court is unclear, on the part of Hooters, in every country they operate in. They would essentially argue that they are not a restaurant, they are an entertainm…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 08:14 AM
1

Best we can do is ... suspended sentence and some community service
/r/MensRights13/06/24 07:34 AM
5

Most kids are abused by women, I can repeat all of your arguments and make them about that using your same twisted messed up lack of logic.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 02:10 AM
4

No, I'm just highlighting that you don't understand statistics.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 02:07 AM
6

asking men to take responsibility for other men like we are all on some big committee... I'll be sure to raise it at the next annual Patriarchy meeting
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:00 PM
6

How many women were not murdered by their male partner vs how many women were not mauled by bears. Several million vs a few hundred I expect
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:59 PM
2

I get no respect from women for being a software engineer, ironic since so many are glued to Instagram, a piece of software. I've written things that keep the world safer for them. The only respect comes from my money.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:30 PM
7

It's also faulty logic, it sounds plausible on the face of it, but you could equally say that men protect the tribe and therefore we evolve to respect men that contribute towards keeping us safe and living in good conditions... something we don't see in any way at all
/r/MensRights08/06/24 12:35 PM
3

I understand what you're saying, but neglecting your kids for hours to me feels different from feeling generally overworked or stressed to an unnaturally high level. I'm more asking if she's unable to recognise that she's spent hours on her phone ignoring her kids, which I feel differs from feeling overwhelmed while taking care of them. IMO that would be a serious mental impairment to be unaware of that, close to not even being cognisant of what you're doing
/r/MensRights06/06/24 04:13 PM
7

Does PPD come with the inability to realise that something is wrong though? If you're neglecting your kids for hours while doomscrolling tiktok all day, and presumably your husband is telling you that you need to take care of the kids... does none of that ring any bells that say hold on I am utterly miserable and maybe I need to ask for help? Even if she says to her husband I am so depressed and I can't deal with the kids please help me, or reaches out to a doctor, or does a google search, or li…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 11:18 AM
18

The only thing it has done really is made a lot of guys aware of just how self-entitled women are. That they can lash out at men with complete impunity, and men just have to be their punching bag. It simple accelerates the end of the western world, as our birth rate plummets and immigration erases the identity of each country as they fill up with people that don't share the country's values and history.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:46 PM
26

Because it's the exact same thing except the person has to admit that black men are dangerous, which makes them think hold on that's a bit racist isn't it, to paint an entire group of people dangerous
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:24 PM
30

Would you prefer to be alone in the forest with a black bear or a black man remains the best alternative.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 01:20 PM
814

Man falsely imprisoned for 17 years, women most affected
/r/MensRights02/06/24 08:40 PM
62

Don't worry, at 49 she's not going to be remotely attractive compared to someone in their late 30s that is also starting to panic.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 03:45 PM
10

I think the would you rather meet a black bear or a black man was the best one.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 03:37 PM
8

It's not possible to stand up to it, because nobody will listen. The only thing men can do is withdraw from society. Ironically, the men they are trying to target, the bad ones, are the ones that don't withdraw so the problem appears to get worse and women are left choosing men from an ever increasingly toxic pool of them. Society will have to get really really bad economically before people are capable of realising that men have all opted out and will just take low paying jobs to fund playing v…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 09:21 AM
14

Why do they treat men like we're all in some big committee and work together on policing all other men
/r/MensRights02/06/24 09:18 AM
3

This simply results in more immigration though. The country's values are eroded from a massive influx of people from poor countries.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 06:50 AM
7

I expect the reason is most lesbians are not actually lesbians. Seems not uncommon for women to suddenly declare themselves gay after a traumatic relationshp/breakup. However the same does not happen for men.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 06:08 PM
3

Not so much given up as lost faith. I mean look at the internet, it is rammed with everyday women that will show you their tits for $5. Almost every bit of content I see with women in has their tits almost hanging out and is some kind of onlyfans advertising. I can only be attracted to somebody that I respect, and I can't respect people that engage in this kind of behaviour. If all I see is shallow women with no depth that plaster their nudes all over reddit, or videos of women doing mundane thi…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 12:29 PM
6

Most guys at my gym just want to train. Most women at my gym just want to wear the tighest fitting clothing they can find and workout near guys hoping they get noticed. Almost every man I see in this situation looks uncomfortable or just completely blanks them.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 11:21 PM
128

But at least society treats them better in other ways, right? right???
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:46 PM
69

Australia is becoming a meme country for anything to do with equality
/r/MensRights24/05/24 09:47 AM
11

Just do women only carriages, or even better, men only carriages so I don't have to endure this bullshit
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:29 PM
8

They do though, that's the problem. These women get all hysterical about it and scared of men, the media publishes articles saying men are terrifying which they absolutely hoover up, and it infects sane women as well. I mean why wouldn't it, if women around you are scared, and the media is publishing articles to scare you, you'd be scared even if you could rationalise it.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 12:09 PM
2

Women are miserable. They've made themselves terrified of everything, they've scared themselves to the point that they fear half of their own species. Antidepressant use amongst women has skyrocketed and I imagine that's only the beginning as these people move age brackets in the next 10 years.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 02:45 PM
15

You're not the only one noticing it, the plummeting birth rate and withdrawal from employment are also signs that guys just don't see the point of entering such a pointless relationship Every attempt to explain, argue, rationalise what's going on results in 'lol found the incel' type responses, meaning the only possibly move guys can make is not to engage at all. The only winning move is not to play.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 11:47 PM
16

The correct headline is "Iran executes 3 women"
/r/MensRights15/05/24 06:48 PM
15

You need cameras man. Cameras outside your house. Cameras inside your house. You need to start gathering evidence. Then next time you say she hit you and they're like "yeah right" you can show them 27 videos of her getting drunk and kicking the shit out of you.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:41 AM
10

If your wife goes nuts or shows signs or threats of violence I guess putting cameras absolutely everywhere is your only chance of defending yourself. And probably better to get the shit beaten out of you than even try to restrain her :/ What a world to live in.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:38 AM
2

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/1 A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents. Same for minors too https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/5 : A person commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with his penis, and (b)the other p…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:18 AM
7

I put a piece of chicken or fish into the oven, which takes about 20 seconds. Then 25-30 minutes later I come back and dump a bunch of various frozen veg into a plastic container and microwave it for ~10 minutes, this takes about 30-60 seconds. Then at the end I either just eat it, or I will microwave some rice or similar. Last bit takes about 1 min. Season with whatever, sauce or personally I just add salt and chilli flakes. Laundry for one, yeah, the amount of clothing does not affect the amou…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 07:30 PM
2

Probably because it'd reduce the effectiveness of arguments saying it's a massive problem that only happens to women.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:45 PM
25

For me, cooking takes about 40 mins but only about 3 mins is actually doing anything, the rest is just watching TV while all the appliances humanity have developed to do jobs for us ... do the jobs for us. Same with laundry. To wash my clothes takes literally the time to stuff it into the washing machine and press go. Drying used to take longer, because I'd have to carefully put each garment onto a drying rack, which would take as much as 5 minutes, but now I stuff it into the drier. The most ta…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 10:22 AM
39

I used to pay a guy for 2 hours every fortnight and my place was immaculate afterwards. He didn't always take 2 hours either. After I read Marie Kondo's book and sorted the house out I didn't need him anymore either, I'd just hoover now and then and wipe the kitchen down.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:37 AM
3

Only so much of that that the country will tolerate though.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 07:12 AM
3

Same question always asked, because it's not rape under UK law. The issue of it not being classified as such has been brought by petition to the government, but the government basically said nah we're not changing it because poor women are the victims
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:09 AM
3

More importantly you've written reported cases. The real thing nobody mentions is that it's usually by someone you know, e.g. your partner, ex-partner, or close (distance-wise) friend.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:52 PM
1

Most people have never been bitten by a shark but it still happens so the frequency is completely irrelevant we're all in danger every day
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:50 PM
18

Are women not lounging around home alone on a Sunday wearing their best outfit and full makeup to do it for themselves?
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:47 PM
6

What's horrible is anyone that doesn't understand their own nature. How can we put a man on the moon but not have people understand their own physiology. That is truly staggering.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:45 PM
21

Happy cake day. This is the wisdom the world needs to hear. The only discussion point is that there is nothing to discuss. The only winning move is not to play. So men quietly withdraw from society... The economy will eventually start to buckle and only then when money gets short and times get hard will diversity go out of the window and things will start to reverse. When women literally can't feed themselves, suddenly a successful man will seem like more of a catch than getting railed by chad w…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:44 PM
1

I don't think it is, it's the result of feminism having too much of a voice, and people's emotions running wild. Nothing is keeping women's emotions in check. The media wants them to feel terrified because they will buy papers and click on articles telling them they're in danger, thus generating ad money. Women feel utterly terrified all the time, and thanks to the internet they can find one small story in one small remote village, and spread that story across the whole internet for every woman …
/r/MensRights10/05/24 02:22 PM
2

I can't say that I really agree. The government isn't chock full of elite rich men, that is almost like saying something vague like 'the patriarchy' is to blame, picturing some elite rich men wearing cowls like james bond villains. MPs are being suspended here left and right for sexual misconduct claims. Here's a list from 2022 https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/may/18/list-of-sexual-misconduct-allegations-made-against-mps One problem is that the government needs votes and support from wom…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 01:08 PM
2

The other question is, did they need to?
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:25 AM
2

The patriarchy is about male superiority though, I don't think patriarchy would be a good fit for the cause of roads having potholes. There needs to be an element of privilege. You'd have to say something like men build roads just for men, who primarily use those roads, and they don't do anything for women or recognise that potholes harm women, something like that, for patriarchy to fit. It boils down to men get all the good stuff - privilege, high status positions, power, jobs, etc. Which is ea…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:03 AM
6

It's not sarcasm. I'm saying that the fastest resolution of these laws would be to go all-in. We're stuck in a place where the rules, laws, and practices are damaging men/society but they're not damaging enough to elicit a sensible response. It's like frog boiling. I think it'd be better to encourage these people to go all in, to create a purity spiral until people say hold on that's ridiculous, at which point they realise that actually it has been ridiculous for some time. When it comes to a he…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:35 AM
2

Patriarchy is just the apex fallacy, that a man is on the top so all the men are advantaged. I think it's s separate concept to men being unrecognised for their work, and most of the hard work is done for themselves.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:17 AM
6

I think they should, I think they should just go all in. We should set up curfews, men should not be allowed to talk to or engage with women in any way in a 1 on 1 setting unless it's recorded. Jobs should be segregated by gender, and in the workplace men and women should not be allowed to interact unless in a meeting of mixed sex or they are accompanied by a chaperone. Might as well go all-in. Maybe take it further and state that male tradespeople and emergency services cannot attend houses whe…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:15 AM
-11

Can't say I agree, I always dislike the exploiting bodies argument of labour. We're born the way we're born. Men want to work, we want to do hard work, we want to be successful and build a social place for ourselves. We're not exploited in that way. If anything we have a huge amount of freedom to do what we want to do in terms of career and role in society, far more than when our ancestors were living in the forest trying to survive. Men want to do these jobs and the dangers are not really that …
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:02 AM
2

Yup, I'm not going to marry because my only value is what I produce, I'm not going to wager that for anything.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 11:29 AM
7

unironically true if it involves smearing period blood all over
/r/MensRights09/05/24 05:41 AM
13

The second one is the best, where they say that you can't predict a man, he might be violent or dangerous you just never know. Then they say the bear is safer because it might not eat you. Like, might not? You mean it's unpredictably violent and dangerous? It boggles the mind how these people are allowed to work in jobs that people rely on.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:56 AM
10

Gosh you mansplainers just don't get it, it was never about the bear it was about the struggles! or something
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:45 AM
5

The way to get what you want is to start your own company, hire out your services as a business, not an employee. You can then choose your clients (the people that pay you), and fire them if they suck. You set your own prices, and if you can perform your duties it doesn't matter if it takes 10 minutes or 10 hours, the client will be happy.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 10:44 PM
6

That sucks, I'm the opposite, I just earned stupid amounts of money because I have nothing better to do and I'll just retire soon and dick about until I die
/r/MensRights07/05/24 05:42 PM
5

I think the problem is that despite men going to college less and less the only issue society sees is that not enough women are doing STEM because of the patriarchy
/r/MensRights07/05/24 09:45 AM
73

Family is the point, I think. To support your family. Of course, if you don't have a family because dating is a shitshow and women spend all day tweeting about how they'd rather have their face ripped off by a bear than even chance being in the same room as you, then there is little point and video games are cheap
/r/MensRights07/05/24 09:43 AM
4

Just butchered em
/r/MensRights28/04/24 01:49 PM
4

So kill em then
/r/MensRights28/04/24 01:26 PM
6

Murder, armed robbery, drug trafficking, kidnapping, large scale fraud, assault & battery You saying those things are ok
/r/MensRights28/04/24 10:16 AM
3

So why not just put a bullet in the head of any offender whose sentence will mean they're over the age of 50 on release? Or are you going to argue in the defence of those proven criminals
/r/MensRights28/04/24 10:04 AM
12

I had similar, went on a date, realised immediately she was some hyper feminist. We had a drink, I asked if she'd like another drink and she say I'LL DECIDE IF I WANT ANOTHER DRINK. I said okay, and she paused and said yes I think I will. Then a bit later she said something about how men are all evil, and I left. The unresolved trauma and hatred was so strong it was like an aura
/r/MensRights26/04/24 03:11 PM
143

I attended a board game event the other day where a woman in my group practically had her tits hanging out, which meant the entire evening all I could think about was not accidentally looking at her or being seen to be looking her way. Very stressful, would much rather people dressed and acted modestly, but failing that when it comes to gyms, having a male only gym.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 09:12 PM
0

I think I did yeah, have a nice day.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 07:01 AM
2

So is your pro-sexism, which is what I was highlighting
/r/MensRights12/04/24 05:45 AM
5

Why pay to maybe pick up a girl when you can instead just buy a woman from a human trader? That's just capitalism.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 10:23 PM
6

I guess you haven't really thought it through. You're a teenager, you're full of random emotions and hormones, and a teacher that you trusted takes advantage of that to have sex with you for her own ends. You'd feel betrayed, you'd feel that you were tricked into something you didn't fully understand, and now half the world knows that you're a victim and you've been subjected to something considered bad. That's a lotta emotional damage. And that's assuming the kid was willing and not pressured o…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:05 AM
55

Gosh what an awful subreddit, how ironic that it would basically scare women into thinking they'll be murdered for saying no when it's such a rare occurrence.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 08:26 AM
1

Doubt you're the first victim, once you take the legal route you'll probably find a history of her doing this crops up.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:55 PM
-6

Nonsense, most of them likely cite the same research, and most of that research is asking not studying. It mentions opinions, desires, etc. Asking someone what they want vs watching what they take are two entirely different things, especially for women who have been known for 'tall dark and handsome' and 'good sense of humour' being the biggest things they ask for yet not what they go for at all or ken dodd would have been slaying non stop
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:40 PM
2

I reserve that for the female ghosbusters film, I don't think I will ever watch that, although given that I thought the same as you about the barbie film before I watched it I have to wonder how much criticism of these films is valid
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:07 PM
7

It's actually quite good, just think of it like a pretty good movie where about 2/3rds of the way in someone stands up and starts talking a bunch of nonsensical self-contradicting feminist shite. If you view it as a film designed as a parody of feminism that tries to show how stupid it is by portraying exaggerated stereotypes, it's not far off. It's a real own-goal.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 04:40 PM
1

I enjoyed the movie, their attempts at pushing a feminist narrative were so poorly executed that it didn't really detract from the film apart from occasionally thinking oh dear they're making a right mess of this. The simping was really cringe as well, and the ending didn't make any sense at all as did quite a bit of the other stuff. Overall because it was so poorly executed it was easy to enjoy the film without all the weird gender crap they tried to shoehorn in. Gosling absolutely nailed his p…
/r/MensRights04/04/24 04:35 PM
1

I'm speaking generally though, across the industry. I don't think it matters if women apply or don't. I find that when they do their CVs are amongst the lowest quality of applicants. Nothing stops them applying, and there are so many incentives. They should be wiping the floor with guys in the current climate but no amount of carrots will tempt them to do something they're not interested in. Nursing is one of the worst paid jobs in the medical sector. I'm confident that is the main reason, even …
/r/MensRights27/03/24 02:58 PM
1

If one of our developers couldn't perform the duties associated with their role, we would let them go. Yeah, I have to say that's incredibly uncommon, most jobs I work at have absolute garbage quality workers. Management are either so far removed or so afraid of firing people, or those people are immune to firing (many countries outside the US don't have the right to just auto fire people). Management have often overruled hires in my experience because they were girls, which is better for the co…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 02:04 PM
6

You shouldn't, but you're gonna if you have any sense. If every time you pet a cat it bit you, would you say 'not all cats' and just keep petting them, or would you stop, or be careful, or treat cats cautiously like they might bite you? It's obvious that you'd be cautious, your brain is even hard wired to make you feel fear in response to things that have hurt you in the past. The same thing would occur when you keep seeing diversity hires. If every time you meet a female programmer it turns out…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 12:19 AM
23

Man sees a man earning lots of money, he wonders how it's possible, looks into it, sees the effort/reward, and goes 'fair enough' Feminism sees man earning lots of money, feels strong emotional jealousy, has no emotional intelligence and just treats those emotions as God's Truth, meaning it's unfair that men are getting all the money, demands equality. At no point does this involve observing how much effort it took for the guy to get into that position, nor how much work he puts in daily. Nor do…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 12:08 AM
25

Or be pretty fat.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 07:50 PM
2

Lawrence later wrote that she didn't want to push for more during negotiations because she "didn't want to seem 'difficult' or 'spoiled'". "At the time, that seemed like a fine idea, until I saw the payroll on the internet and realised every man I was working with definitely didn't worry about being 'difficult' or 'spoiled'." lol Even Colman can just ask for more money if she's not happy. If they say no it's because she's not worth that much. Her costar may be more in demand or a better fit, les…
/r/MensRights26/03/24 11:12 AM
3

There's always mental health issues though. See if you can find a single instance of a woman doing bad that isn't because her husband is abusive or she was under incredible stress from having the same normal life everyone else has
/r/MensRights19/03/24 10:19 AM
1

You can't win, but you can ask them who designed their clothing, and comment, gucci, louis vuitton, prada, all men... But don't make any conclusion or discuss anything further, just refuse to engage after mentioning that in any way. It will drive them mad if you don't engage whatsoever. They say "Yeah but......<reasons>" and you just say "Fair enough" with a shrug, like you don't care but you also don't accept or refute what they said.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 11:43 AM
81

I love that they're like I get that it's about merit but you could like focus on diversity? Okay, here's the candidates ranked by their skills, experience and merit, the top 4 are men and we have 4 vacancies, explain how we "highlight a broader issue within our institute’s approach to diversity and inclusivity".
/r/MensRights12/03/24 10:19 PM
21

Toxic masculinity is really anything that doesn't benefit women, and to some extent, wider society. Eg: Aggression is awful, except when women want men to defend them against an attacker. When a man fights off a crazed attacker or an animal, suddenly their aggression (i.e. willingness to throw themselves into combat) is wonderful and brave. Separation of emotions is terrible, except when a man is able to endure a difficult situation and remain strong throughout without panicking and breaking dow…
/r/MensRights11/03/24 12:34 AM
6

I've never hired a woman because they have all had terrible CVs/resumes in comparison to the men that apply, there's just no way you can get shortlisted when guys are coming in listing their github side projects and the events and talks they do, their experience and absolutely smashing the technical tests out of the park, when every female CV I've had has just been very bland, minimum experience, and they can't pass the technical test. Despite that though I have been overruled 3 times and we've …
/r/MensRights08/03/24 01:21 PM
13

That was one of the greatest events of our time, I listened to it on the boyscast. The way they tried to argue the people weren't really non-binary was hilarious, like sure go ahead explain how you can tell.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 01:18 PM
21

It's awful, when I got my first proper computer programming job, there was a girl there who did computer science at uni who tried to boss me around. She had 0 programming ability despite having a CS degree. She said that she did an internship in America (I'm in UK) for one of the big name companies. An incredible opportunity. She was given it because they gave it to the highest performing woman on the course. Her grade was 32% which was technically a fail but the university could at their discre…
/r/MensRights08/03/24 01:13 PM
12

Think it was just covid, a lot of women got a dog for companionship, and now they still have them and are very attached.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 08:26 PM
45

I want to date someone without them having to be constantly thinking about the dog, walking the dog, going to venues that allow dogs, lots of excursions that involve taking the dog, lots of things revolving around the dog, having trouble staying overnight with the dog etc. Also on top of all that inconvenience, I don't really like dogs.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 07:59 PM
37

I think dating apps have reached peak uselessness after covid. I hate them but before covid with a bit of effort I'd get a date every 1-2 weeks. After covid, nothing whatsoever, plus everyone on there has a dog which is a no go.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 07:38 PM
15

What has France done that's so great? They made paternity testing illegal which is awful.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 07:04 PM
13

Almost every single hostage released so far was female, it is bonkers.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 09:19 AM
3

iirc the original question listed a variety of scenarios that they counted as sexual assault, and asked if you'd experienced any. Something like, "Have you ever experienced unwanted touching/groping, unwanted sexual advances, or had sex after drinking alcohol" The answer is gonna be yes for the last one, but they roped it in with the others to say right well that's sexual assault
/r/MensRights03/03/24 08:01 PM
14

Bless, you think that they'll be addressing the issues of men in sanitation
/r/MensRights03/03/24 11:59 AM
4

Makes sense from a religious perspective, but from a non-religious perspective polygamy would just be for cucks the way things are going, just a way for women to be provided for by a rich beta while fucking a chad
/r/MensRights02/03/24 12:44 PM
5

Or get knocked up in prison
/r/MensRights19/02/24 10:40 PM
30

It's pretty normal when investigating a crime to gather evidence. They should have taken her phone and devices as well.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:48 PM
15

“In the course of my research I have not found any country that pursues these cases against women rape complainants in the way the UK does. The UK has an unusual approach and I think their approach violates human rights,” she said. lol because making false allegations doesn't violate human rights but calling people out on it does Amazing how the guardian jumps to defend the criminal, imagine if it was an article about a guy who raped someone and was convicted nd they jumped in with endless apolo…
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:43 PM
7

If she does it 7 or 8 more times then she might be arrested, the bar is literally that high for anyone to take it seriously
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:42 PM
2

Being neither a ped or a rapist, sounds like they made a false claim against you and thus are exactly the type of person you want to avoid lol, how ironic
/r/MensRights03/02/24 10:49 AM
1

I'm not really talking about single mothers though
/r/MensRights01/02/24 09:07 AM
2

As babies, sure, but schools were mostly male teachers, and kids even from single digit ages would work alongside their fathers, so their behaviours and learning were modelled by them. These days most teachers are female and children don't work alongside their fathers at all
/r/MensRights01/02/24 09:06 AM
29

People are a product of their upbringing, there is nothing inherently bad about women but the way society raises them causes negative traits to emerge. Most people are raised by women these days rather than working alongside their fathers or other men, so they learn to act how women tell them to act, not how men tell them to act.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 05:00 PM
4

We have these signs all over Bristol, which include "Unwanted staring" and "Unwanted attention". There was another sign which was even worse, which included 'outnumbering women'. There is also a huge multiple storey mural in the centre of Bristol which says EVERY WOMEN in huge letters, and another huge mural next to it that lists the items on the sign above at night (UV paint). Imagine one that said 'MEN' lol
/r/MensRights20/01/24 09:24 AM
18

They should have split them entirely into men only and women only. I would love to be able to work out without worrying about sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 09:17 AM
18

They don't even need camera equipment, my gym has women dotted around doing this kind of thing without any cameras. They'll drag a mat in front of the treadmills while wearing almost nothing and just start doing handstands and shit to show off their bodies. I don't want to look at girls when I am running, I especially don't want to have something in front of me that if I accidentally glance at it I could be construed to be a pervert. I just want to run.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 09:16 AM
3

I think they do until the consequences actually come about. It's not an overreaction at the present time. The woman at the start of the video was sentenced to 35 days for lying. 35 days!
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:51 PM
4

She proudly posts stories in her husband's merc as if it's her own car. It is her car, she's married
/r/MensRights27/12/23 10:14 AM
12

Most of the comments on the article I read about this in The Times were women saying that they couldn't trust men to take it. And others saying why are you fucking people that you don't trust...
/r/MensRights15/12/23 12:50 PM
14

Yep, boxing gym or similar. I went to one for a while near my workplace, people go there for one reason only, to lift heavy weights.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 07:39 PM
2

You should crosspost this to jordan peterson sub. And I guess some more places because it's not going to reach 10k otherwise.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 09:23 AM
7

Unfortunately that sub is a bit of a shithole, there aren't really any UK subreddits you can post this kinda thing to anymore. CasualUK is the main subreddit but they ban politics.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 09:33 PM
1

If a computer came and looked at that article objectively, they would probably conclude that pages of allegations leading to nothing would suggest that there's likely a problem with untrue allegations.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 03:54 PM
1

I would buy a copy and give it to him, it's not a long book, but it will help him so much if he reads it. Then keep it on the shelf for the next person :)
/r/MensRights30/11/23 12:18 PM
3

Yeah but you need emotional intelligence to go with it. It's normal to feel scared waiting at the doctor's to have your vaccinations. It's important to realise that although your feelings are real, there isn't actually any risk, and therefore we shouldn't do something like ban vaccinations in order to alleviate the feeling of being scared. However modern society seems to keep trying to find ways to make women feel safer or less scared, regardless of if it's a good idea, and regardless of the har…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 12:01 PM
6

It says feeling safe. It should say teach girls to prioritise being safe over wanting to feel safe.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 11:57 AM
12

Tell your friend to read the book No More Mr Nice Guy, it perfectly matches exactly this scenario, it was written by a marriage counsellor, and it will explain exactly what he needs to do to fix his situation.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 11:55 AM
20

Don't worry we don't have any police left to do any actual policing, and criminals are slowly noticing, meaning crime rises more and more.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:04 PM
8

The problem is that men do great things and bad things. If a man does a good thing, he is called good. If a man does a bad thing, all men are called bad. If a woman does a bad thing, she is called bad. If a woman does a good thing, all women are called good.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:06 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKSUEa3sTXo That section is around the 15:47 mark
/r/MensRights27/11/23 02:54 PM
15

Thing is girls do feel more affected whereas guys get that shit non stop as well we just tune it out. If I took every comment I got online seriously then I'd be a jibbering wreck.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 11:34 PM
5

The media around this is glorious, the boyscast ep on it was fantastic
/r/MensRights26/11/23 11:32 PM
6

I'll just put that over there with the other things I ignore -society
/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:50 PM
5

They won't, and they'll likely continue to celebrate success. It'll be girl power and when men don't join it's because they can't handle strong women
/r/MensRights12/11/23 08:09 PM
1

It's not a good thing or a bad thing. It's just the preference of men. Women that are 30 years old are more physically attractive than women 40 years old. Likewise, if you want to get to know someone and then start a family, 40 is too late. The only thing that is unrealistic is thinking that you can coast through life on your sexual market value alone. Because once you hit 35 or so it drops off rapidly. I'm not saying all men are CONSCIOUSLY preying on younger women to manipulate them, but I thi…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:06 PM
35

This isn't red pill at all though. Why are you trying to justify yourself? Just leave. Go to a divorce lawyer, talk to them about the absolute best way to get divorced. Get your affairs in order, and pull the plug. Go find someone that actually likes you and respects you and go have sex if you want it.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 04:42 PM
4

Kids always try pushing boundaries like this, the problem is that they haven't been told off or told it's inappropriate. So they just keep doing it. It's the fault of the parents or teachers entirely. My little cousin did similar, she wanted to play with me and steal my hat, and we were playing as I stole it back etc, when I held her so she couldn't get it, she said "you're hurting me!!!" because she learned that if she said that then people would let her go, followed by immediately trying to st…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:56 AM
21

Incel men were traditionally guys that get told if they're Nice Guys women will like them, so they often become doormats for women. Recently though it's difficult to find women because the media has terrorised women into being scared of men, and the only way to break through that is to be chad enough to elicit positive emotion that overrides the panic. Incel women as you describe are basically women that coast by on their emotions and feelings, 'empowered' by society that tells them they can do …
/r/MensRights06/11/23 04:59 PM
0

Sounds like you're being shit tested to me. Just laugh and agree in an exaggerated completely over-the-top way. Take a page from the red pill and look up A&A. Part of being a man is demonstrating frame, that you're strong and things don't get to you. Girls get a thrill out of teasing a guy in this way and having the guy adeptly shrug it off, just like guys enjoy teasing girls. The worst thing you can do as a guy in this situation is DEER - Defend, Excuse, Explain, Rationalise.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 12:21 PM
0

Of course it's practical. Your partner has an all expenses paid life raising a kid, which is most guy's dream (God of War and The Last of Us being some of the biggest game franchises in the world, both focused on a man raising a kid). You could have them repay that debt as a kind of alimony. That'd be a start. Two humans agree to raise a child together, one of them opts to continue being a wage slave to fund the other. It should be done on the agreement that if the other then walks away, they ha…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 10:12 AM
2

Why is it suddenly the other person's kids? She's raising her kids, funded by her partner. As I said, to be equitable she should go back to work, and pay for him to raise 'her' kids, then after however many years, they'll both be in exactly the same position. That is a completely fair solution. Looking at how much it costs to pay others to do something is not a useful comparison either, it would cost me like £50 to get someone to come to my house and make me a sandwich in my kitchen, but to do i…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 10:17 PM
5

I disagree, it's baffling why having a career and working is suddenly some amazing thing. Most people hate working. Being able to raise a child while being fully funded with everything paid for for years? You should be the one repaying your husband. To make things fair, you go back to work for 5 years and pay all of his costs while he raises the child. Then you're both equal! I mean losing a couple of years of career, if you even have a career that progresses is what, a few thousand dollars a ye…
/r/MensRights26/10/23 11:42 PM
4

What did she have before she got married? Must have had a job, no?
/r/MensRights26/10/23 02:33 PM
15

Any law can backfire I fail to see why this is different. Perhaps alimony laws in the first place might incite the person paying to murder the other, therefore we shouldn't have alimony. Heck, perhaps we should force men to hand over all of their paycheck just in case the women murder them if they don't.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 10:47 AM
18

So you're saying men don't check up on your ex-wife to see if you're eligible to stop paying thousands of dollars to her, because if you do she might buy a gun and kill you? Wtf?
/r/MensRights26/10/23 10:43 AM
17

Jeez I thought we didn't have alimony in the UK but apparently we do, called spousal maintenance. Just another reason not to get married.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 10:35 AM
14

Oh don't be ridiculous. In the context of the article, that is all you would need to do, demonstrate that alimony is no longer applicable anymore because your ex-partner is in a relationship.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 10:23 AM
34

Stalking your ex-wife in this case literally just means checking to see if they're not fraudulently hosing you down for cash while having a relationship on the side. It probably involves checking their Facebook once a month and asking one of their friends for an update occasionally. Hardly stalking.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 10:05 AM
42

What is the point of alimony exactly? It doesn't make much sense to me. I think feminists have tricked society into thinking having an all-expenses-paid break from work to raise a kid and chillax is somehow a terrible burden that is deserving of even more money on top of all the all expenses paid part.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 10:03 AM
5

That's society and the media in general - if you tell men not to talk to women, the only people talking to women will be the type of person that ignores the rule. That's why I laugh when I see these signs all over the city about don't talk, harass, flirt, hug, wave, outnumber etc. women. Okay, I won't. But the asshole over there? He will. Congratulations, you've played yourself.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 10:01 AM
5

ICQ was wild, just searching for people nearby and messaging them and meeting up
/r/MensRights25/10/23 09:59 AM
15

This is why social media is a shitshow and it's getting worse. It was bad enough with Facebook, posting a picture of yourself to harvest likes. It got worse with instagram, a competitive multiplayer game for harvesting the most likes, you have to create posed and artificial images to show a lifestyle you don't actually have or have just a fraction of the time. Then it reached peak awfulness with TikTok, where people now obtain likes and clout by creating either stupid downright embarassing video…
/r/MensRights25/10/23 09:49 AM
2

Well said. However I think those traits come out in both men and women when things need doing. Which is a good thing. I think the problematic difference is that men tend to pitch in and work with people to get results, whereas women tend to just command people to do things, so they end up looking bitchy and people don't respect them as much. You can bully me for not shovelling coal fast enough if you're standing next to me also shovelling coal with the sweat pouring off your face if I am slackin…
/r/MensRights25/10/23 09:39 AM
1

Good, you deserve it for trying to push this bullshit feminist agenda into an MRA group. The same type of behaviour we see over and over, ingratiate yourself, pretend to be one, start pushing intersectionality, divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 09:33 AM
1

How so, do you have some empirical evidence? I'll save you the bother, no, you'll just reply that your feelings say it can't be true, as a woman feminist cosplaying as an MRA you have absolutely no fucking clue at all and are just continuing to troll in the face of overwhelming evidence that is a single google search away. Simply type 'how do women select mates' and read some papers on it, or watch a video e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmYs6C8yPq0 Get yourself educated, I know you won't
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:42 PM
1

I thought you were an MRA with your title of what "we" want. Or is the mask slipping? Or did you mean to post that on your alt account.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:33 PM
1

No, pretty sure that's the feminists like yourself.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:32 PM
0

Toxic masculinity does not exist. Women do not select based on 'aggressive' traits, this is insulting to women to suggest they only like bullies and thugs. Women and men are attracted to people who are strong, capable, and confident. Yes, these traits are visible in bullies and thugs. But they're also visible in charismatic leaders, scientists, and quiet nerds, and they have nothing to do with aggression in these instances. It is the underlying traits that are attractive. It's ridiculous to thin…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 10:21 AM
-3

/u/SwoleFeminist go troll somewhere else, or at least try to support your outrageous claims that all men are toxic.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 10:07 AM
2

You should look up the male dominance hierarchy then, it is fairly well documented and reasoned. I mentioned elsewhere that if you see a man who has lots of success with women, he's almost always well-liked or at least respected by men. This isn't a coincidence. The literal science of mate selection for women outsources decision making onto the male dominance hierarchy. Men establish who is the best man in the group automatically and women are attracted to those at the top. Maybe you should stop…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 10:06 AM
1

I've just seen your username, just a troll post, should have seen it earlier.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 11:26 PM
6

Toxic masculinity is whenever a man does something that doesn't benefit women (or in some cases, society, which generally means women indirectly or children), especially if they don't like it. For example, man sees another man being intimidating, goes and fights him, toxic masculinity. Why are men always fighting each other? Why so much bravado and testosterone? So toxic. Reason being, it didn't benefit a woman, and she felt negative emotions about men she doesn't know fighting. Man fights off g…
/r/MensRights23/10/23 11:24 PM
11

Humans have 2 legs, false, not all humans.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 11:18 PM
-3

Well spoken. OP is just a feminist troll trying to harm the subreddit and should be banned. Contrary to the title of this post which is wrong, if you want to impress women, just impress men. When you're held in high regard by other men, women will notice. You don't have to be a piece of trash human being. It becomes obvious to see when you consider the guys you know that have lots of success with women. How likeable/respected are they by other men? Overwhelmingly, it is a lot. The "popular" kid …
/r/MensRights23/10/23 11:17 PM
10

I'd imagine it's the traits that often manifest in bullies that are attractive, rather than specifically actual bullies themselves that are attractive.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 11:13 PM
1

I'm happy to defend any point I have made. If that's the best you can do in response to someone, then you should reevaluate what words of wisdom you think you have to share with others. Your title implies that men are toxic in the first place. Are you a feminist trying to sneak in the idea under the radar that men are inherently toxic and we just need to decide exactly how?
/r/MensRights23/10/23 11:04 PM
0

I don't think any of this is true. Toxic masculinity is when men do things that don't benefit women, especially when women don't like what they're doing. Impressing men is literally the key to obtaining women, since women generally defer their judgement of who is attractive to who is highest in the male dominance hierarchy. If all the men don't like you, the women won't like you. But if you walk into a room and every man comes up to you and says hello, and gives you a clap on the back like they …
/r/MensRights23/10/23 09:08 PM
32

Easy to say this when you're an adult but as a child, you don't really know better. When I was a kid a teacher slapped me in the face. I assumed it was my fault and I was deserving. I never told my parents because why would you tell your parents you were punished for misbehaving?
/r/MensRights23/10/23 09:01 PM
2

I had a sigmoidoscopy which is the same as a colonoscopy but they don't go as deep, they don't give you anaesthetic for it and I can say at points when they inflate you with air, holy shit it hurts like fuck! Like enough that you have to say something out loud. Didn't have to endure it for long and it absolutely wouldn't put me off doing it again, but I can absolutely see why they'd want you out for the colonoscopy.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 11:26 AM
11

Feels like a human right's violation to me to say you risk 30 years so if you agree not to have a fair trial we'll just throw you in for 5 years because you'll definitely lose
/r/MensRights19/10/23 09:41 AM
1

I think they're being sneaky by not actually offering the job to minority groups, but just a 'registration of interest'. I suspect they will gather all these people up, butter them up about the role, encourage them, give them help making a successful application etc, and then they will open the role up on a random day and time, very poorly advertised with limited information about what they're looking for to the general public, and then e-mail all of the people that attended their women-only eve…
/r/MensRights15/10/23 07:15 PM
9

Please don't.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 11:46 AM
10

This is a troll response lol, what are you supposed to do when your partner gets violent with you, punch her in the face and go to prison and lose your job?
/r/MensRights15/10/23 11:40 AM
15

Because domestic violence isn't a gender-exclusive issue. Every individual deserves safety and support if they're experiencing abuse. Saying that a 'battered man' is a joke diminishes the pain and trauma many men go through. It's not about pretending men and women are the same. It's about recognising that pain, trauma, and fear don't discriminate based on gender. You are not only invalidating the experiences of countless men but also reinforcing the idea that men should always be strong, invinci…
/r/MensRights15/10/23 11:37 AM
18

Surely his lawyer would tell him to do this immediately if it were an option?
/r/MensRights12/10/23 07:18 PM
6

UK as well, even The Times.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 12:10 PM
11

Yep, the choice for women might be children or career. The choice for men is career or children you can barely raise and career. Sadly no luxury of being paid by our wives to raise a kid, which let's face it is almost every man's fantasy. We can see it from games like God of War and The Last of Us being some of the top selling games of all time.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 10:34 PM
28

Nothing that's as easy and quick. Luckily I've been raised with a moral framework and taught not to simply indulge my base lizard whims. So I stop and think, then act. The idea that asking women to do the same, stop and think, and then act, being some ridiculous impossible thing is astounding to me.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 08:24 PM
57

Hundreds of thousands of years of evolution say that I should just bonk a woman on the head with a rock and then drag her to my cave. Being human is about overriding your base desires, we're not common animals. I don't gorge myself to obesity because my lizard brain tells me to eat more doughnuts. The real answer is that society has encouraged and supported women in feeling they are entitled to everything. They act like they're entitled to everything, and then when the encouragement and support …
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:21 PM
35

The message being sent is simply don't approach, leaving women to date the type of person that ignores their wishes.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:17 PM
8

I don't think this is dual mating strategy, Tinder is for getting ploughed by chad only, not for anything else. What they put in their profile is partially to not appear/feel like a slut, and partially the other dual mating strategy which is to put up resistance and wait for someone worthy to try and break it.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 04:02 PM
3

Can't make hot pot
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/23 07:27 PM
26

The Times have gone all in on this, I've never seen so many articles on one topic. The investigation was in part conducted by them, but they've conducted other investigations and those have resulted in 1-2 big articles. This is article after article after article like I've never seen before. And the worst part is, most of them are just filled with hearsay, which is very unlike The Times. I have a feeling this is going to blow up in a big way if people try to take the guy to court.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 01:04 PM
28

The irony is that you're not competing against top quality dudes, because you probably are a top quality dude. You're competing with someone that looks good and does well on Tinder or social media, who presents an attractive image to women but who would be likely be terrible as a partner.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:51 AM
1

You need legal advice from a solicitor.
/r/MensRights04/09/23 11:05 PM
1

Probably the easiest way is to ask what would happen if you shouted "This woman just touched my crotch". People would be like lol what the fuck haha random lmao Then try "This man just touched my crotch" and instantly every man in earshot goes hostile, some will come and defend the woman, everybody would immediately hate the guy. I can't imagine a clearer example of showing we live in a matriarchy than the general population having that kind of reaction when any woman can command that much of me…
/r/MensRights03/09/23 11:58 PM
3

Bluey is similar, it's a great show in most ways, but it does portray the dad as being an inexhaustible source of entertainment for the kids, like he must always endlessly provide for them whims despite being tired or having just finished a shift at work. It really emphasises the gender role of the male to be a provider
/r/MensRights02/09/23 09:51 AM
3

Probs worth it
/r/MensRights29/08/23 03:27 PM
8

This is also illegal though and they have prosecuted for doing it before
/r/MensRights29/08/23 02:03 PM
26

In theory, but the main problem is how men are treated, raised to idolise women, not stare, look, or have sexual thoughts about them. Then young lads get older and they're terrified to even flirt with women, let alone fuck them. They feel so uneasy about women that they can't perform because they've been brainwashed that it's wrong. Happens a lot in religion (to both sexes) but recently also more in general terms.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 09:05 AM
50

You assume that people see their own children as being the same as other people, I think there's a huge disconnect there. "My little god emperor would never do that!" I doubt they notice bias against their own kid is actual general bias against everyone manifesting against their own kid in this instance. Probably think it's one off and targeted.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:25 PM
3

I said exactly the same thing, I just reworded it to change the tone
/r/MensRights21/08/23 11:27 AM
3

No I haven't. The whole point is that they've insinuated he's guilty but just got off on a technicality, when that may not be the case. I could accuse you of stealing all of my underpants. In court, I'd present my eyewitness testimony. You'd present your evidence which is that you have no idea who I am, you live on the other side of the world, and this is obviously bullshit. The judge dismisses the charges. The following statement is released: “We dismissed the charges today as a result of havin…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 11:15 AM
1

Yeah I thought shipman was the most prolific and he killed old people, not children like OP is suggesting.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 11:33 PM
5

Every case that doesn't result in a guilty verdict is dismissed because of insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt
/r/MensRights20/08/23 11:28 PM
62

“We dismissed the charges today as a result of having insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.” You dismissed the charges because they were baseless due to an absence of evidence that domestic violence occurred. They try to make it sound like he got away with it.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:46 AM
2

Circular definition though, what's a female.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 12:02 PM
9

I feel uncomfortable being around younger women. They always seem to have a deer in the headlights look. I'm afraid that anything I do or say will make them fearful of me. Even if there are no repercussions I don't want people to feel afraid around me because it makes me feel like a bad person, so avoidance is best.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 11:58 AM
1

Cos when they're like, 2 years old and they scream and kick and fight mummy dearest goes there there have some ice cream my little angel. The same when they're 3, 4, 5, 6 years old, 7, 8, 9, all the way to being little teenager god emperors who can do no wrong. Then mummy dearest starts getting afraid when the little monster now has teeth and claws and they call the police to give them the parenting they never bothered to give themselves
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:15 PM
1

Depends on how you define tough and resilient I suppose. If you're talking about being strong, or enduring harsh conditions, emotional trauma, high pressure situations etc. I assumed it was encompassing all of that.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 09:45 AM
1

Overwhelmingly, men are far stronger and more resilient than women. Yeah but isn't that because of the first part? I think women that grow up in similar circumstances learn to be tough and resilient as well. Physical strength, perhaps men are a little stronger on average, although I am sure plenty of women that go to the gym casually are stronger than male nerds that don't. But everything else is a product of their environment by my reckoning. Women being frequently praised for looking pretty is…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 06:19 AM
1

The legally recognised union of two people
/r/MensRights07/08/23 11:37 PM
12

If I could advise men, it would be first to look inward. Before reaching out to women for support, understand that this is about your friendship with yourself and how you accept your emotions, fears, and femininity. Whether you journal, go to therapy, or work through it mentally, find a way to be safe in your skin as a whole person. A person who cries, feels joy, and can embrace all aspects of themselves. Read books on healing your emotions, finding ways to communicate your needs, and understand…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:58 PM
1

It's really not the same thing at all. You're equating relativistic thinking with victim mentality, the two are not the same. Relativistic thinking is about different people having different points of view, and that truth and knowledge are context-dependent. The desire here is for true 50/50. That's always been the goal. Marriage tips this in favour of the woman, and therefore to restore balance, it is important to be smart and not get married. This isn't about making marriage cater to men, it's…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:49 PM
1

Not really, I'm just saying what I see. People don't think their marriage will end in divorce when it does, yet divorce rates are huge, 50% or higher. With odds that low I think it's pretty clear that people are unable to clearly make long term predictions and that it's naive to assume that if you just size up your partner properly that you'll be able to predict these things well in advance. Miserable and never trying what? My only advice is don't legally marry. Have a fake marriage, present as …
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:36 PM
24

I don't even think it takes someone like that to feel that way. I like to assume women aren't stupid, when I see a male dominated field like computer science, of which 97% of people on my course were male, when almost every single poster is advertised with young women doing it, surely if you're a woman you feel demeaned that they're deliberately doing that to try and tell you, hey women totally do this too (even though they don't), just look at these stock models! Meanwhile despite this advertis…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 02:28 PM
1

Can't say that's necessarily true, considering people that find their wife has done a complete U turn after marriage. Or people that find their partner has been cheating on them for months despite everything being completely happy at home.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 02:20 PM
2

I think you've mistaken being lucky for being a guru that can predict people's attitudes years down the line when things change. Not talking about guys down the pub, talking about the idea of finding a long term partner. I think it's rare to find such a person when you're young that'll stick around forever. But that's just life. The problem is the legally binding document that people sign that allows one side to become complacent or fleece you in the event of things going wrong.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:21 AM
1

Probably works in child custody services
/r/MensRights07/08/23 06:56 AM
3

Your solution to failing relationships is 'git gud'? You're naive if you think people don't change, get bored, get tired etc especially when life changes, e.g. starting a family or realising that yes your partner has to go to work for 8 hours a day. It's a commitment that some people aren't interested in. To pretend you can predict how people will act when life changes around them is complete folly.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 06:50 AM
5

OP can you get fake married? I would consider having a ceremony etc minus the legally binding part of signing the contracts. Then presenting as husband and wife. Nobody would ever need to know. In the UK unless you are officially married on paper then there are no protections, so in theory they can't change their mind in court.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 10:15 AM
1

Have experienced exactly what you describe! Used to have a great banter with someone, so I thought, then they tried to get me alone and hit on me. Despite being 20 years older and married. Sent me a bunch of creepy texts. Really fucked me up. Finished my time there avoiding them. Another woman there was also fond of me, which was useful as it helped me secure a raise and some training I wanted. I wasn't manipulating her, I was genuinely nice to her and everyone else, but I realised that she migh…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:59 AM
19

Good old Japan. Has a massive issue with child custody and kidnapping, despite being a signatory of the Hague convention. People can literally be living in another country and if a parent (usually the mother) abducts their child back to Japan, that's it. You'll burn your life fortune trying to fight for any kind of custody. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 is a multilateral treaty designed to protect children from wrongful removal and retention acro…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:55 AM
3

Here's a great podcast and in this episode he talks all about nerdcore: https://darknetdiaries.com/episode/78/ Worth a listen, the podcast itself is generally pretty good, especially the earlier episodes
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:06 PM
5

For contrast here's the lyrics to nerdcore song Bitcoin Baron by YTCracker and yes this song is far better than you'd expect: You know rappers like to rock chains I rock blockchains knock em out the box off mount gox mang Keyring full of wallet data I gotta pray that my ASIC incinerators Blow the mine like a creeper one time And my circuits divine a fine way to keep the power bill in check My equipment is starting to sweat (from the heat) Cryptoanarchy becoming a threat (so elite) You know rappe…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:59 PM
12

The French international footballer was alleged to have later told her “it’s fine, I’ve had sex with 10,000 women”, the court was told.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:57 PM
2

I want to find a woman that isn't a psychopathic murderer too. Does that indicate I think the vast majority of women are psychopathic murderers. What's with the character attack? What are you trying to gain?
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:35 PM
1

Ok? Not something I said
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:11 PM
0

My comment is a scathing indictment of the current state of dating and relationships, as observed by myself, running contrary to what is written in the article. Not all women are ‘whores’, I would guess only a few are. Nobody asked but ok
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:00 PM
3

Why are you not? It's a shitshow out there. If you don't want to listen to pushback against this kind of article, then you're in the wrong place.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 10:19 AM
9

This is a big part of it. I've had it shoved down my throat that women should be strong and independent and CAN do anything a MAN can do. So me, aggressively successful, judges women by that exact criteria. And most women are found wanting. I've had it hammered into me that women can do all these great things. So I'm like great, find a woman that's just like me then, aggressively career focused with a well rounded set of hobbies and lofty ambitions, because any woman that isn't like that is obvi…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 11:12 PM
4

Yeah right, I'm an economically attractive man, I earn stupid money. I can't see anyone that's even worth my time. All I want is someone that isn't fat as fuck who is pleasant to be around and happy who has a few interests and hobbies and aspirations that isn't a massive fucking whore. Haven't seen anyone matching that yet. So, single I remain. If you're a woman struggling to find a mate, perhaps it isn't because there aren't any viable men, but rather, the men you find to be viable men just ain…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 11:08 PM
3

Oh absolutely. Just get married without signing the document, present as mr and mrs, but don't do anything legally binding if it's so important. Just ensure local laws don't overrule it.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 01:10 PM
26

The really weird thing is how they look at loss of career and not working as being a bad thing. She doesn't work, raises kids. He works, pursues his career. They think, she lost out on her career and income, she needs money from him. Like bitch do you think he WANTED to go to work? You think he wanted to push the fucking boat busting his balls to get promoted to better provide for his family? She's had a free ride and got to enjoy raising kids while he's had to work and also raise the kids as we…
/r/MensRights11/07/23 10:49 PM
2

I could not understand that article, here is a better explanation https://www.matthewlaneandassociates.com/blog/governor-ron-desantis-vetoes-florida-alimony-reform-bill-2022/
/r/MensRights11/07/23 10:41 PM
1

Again, which part? Men want to fight and compete, it doesn't matter if it's the battlefield, sports, or finance, they strive to work. Physical prowess they like to watch, hence why sport dominates the television, the country watches football non-stop, wimbledon in the summer, the olympics, you name it. A quick google reveals that 84% of the country watched sport this summer in the UK on the BBC alone, nevermind sky sports and other packages.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 10:41 AM
1

Which part? Look around your room and count the items that weren't made by men, out of materials that men dug out of the ground and refined, and how many things weren't invented by men. Look also at the history of sports and hobbies, people want to compete. Look at video games, people want to compete and be the best. Mostly men. Look at every big gaming tournament, video, board game, etc. Completely male dominated. We want to be the best and strive to create and compete.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 08:58 AM
1

Movies are supposed to be fantasy, as a guy I love seeing big strong dudes fighting each other. I think it's in every man's blood, to want to fight and compete with each other and witness displays of physical prowess.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 06:40 PM
16

"Girls can do that too" Okay, go on then
/r/MensRights09/07/23 01:14 PM
2

You're describing Markov Chains but I think gpt is much more complex. It examines and refines its own output through a multistage pipeline. It's also heavily edited, so the output is given to a team of people who flag behaviours that aren't acceptable. And what's acceptable is whatever their ideology is. Without these filters it would say a lot of stuff that society wouldn't like.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 09:53 PM
-5

No, it isn't. Murder requires malice. No malice, no murder.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 05:07 PM
-2

Murder generally requires pre-planning of some sort, you'd never prove that she got into the car intending to kill him or that her actions were not driven by the perceived threat to herself. The charge would be something else, and she'd plea down to something even lesser and get some token sentence I would imagine.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 04:29 PM
68

Not misogyny, this is in fact prejudice against being a fatty
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:55 PM
1

No chance of murder, there will be a plea deal as per usual for something lesser, serves some kind of small sentence which is either suspended or house arrest etc
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:54 PM
26

On the one hand that's a terrible crime that should carry a huge sentence. But on the other hand, she is a woman, so I guess 1 year house arrest should do it -judge, probably
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:52 PM
3

Indeed maybe the woman goes and does the weekly shop and the cost of stuff has gone up so she's spending more. But it's the husband that's earning that money, and possibly even doing more overtime to keep it so the family can continue to buy the same stuff. Which isn't part of the survey.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 11:47 AM
21

Can guarantee that some of their evidence would be that men don't complain about it much or seem affected. The neglected part is that they have no choice... as echoed in the main CDC survey when it shows the 10 year follow up for men those that did claim to be victims basically moved on and forgot about it. Nobody likes a man that complains but it can be tolerated for short periods provided they get over it already.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 05:05 PM
1

Fortunately, the UK doesn't have common law marriage
/r/MensRights16/06/23 01:47 PM
12

Depending on country, just don't get legally married imo. Here in the UK if you're not married then you're entitled to nothing (other than child support if you have a kid). So just do what some people do, have the wedding, present as married husband and wife etc, but just don't sign on the dotted line. If I ever ended up in a situation of wanting to marry someone, which I doubt because I think marriage is bad for relationships, then that is what I would do.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 08:08 AM
8

I mean it's not uncommon to see a woman who has been dumped or cheated on vent online about how all men are selfish bastards etc. And they see this type of behaviour online in men and assume that the venting is just the norm for them, despite the fact the internet is a complete cess-pit and people shitpost about all kinds of things just to feel better. How many people frequently rant to their friends about their boss or their job being shit, and wishing their boss would just straight up die, or …
/r/MensRights15/06/23 11:30 PM
5

Took their sweet ass time 'banning' /r/inceltears though didn't they
/r/MensRights15/06/23 11:28 PM
14

Bollocks innit If you tell me saying the word potato inflicts pain on you so I deliberately scream potato over and over at you until you die, saying "It's not illegal to say potato" isn't really gonna hold up in court.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 09:08 PM
1

Who decides which male students are attractive? Presumably the female teacher. And we know from dating apps how women rate men's attractiveness with almost all of them being below average...
/r/MensRights14/06/23 03:05 PM
3

If you're gonna troll put a bit more effort in
/r/MensRights14/06/23 12:00 PM
16

Someone should submit legal plea/petition/paperwork to reclassify the UN as a supremacist hate group, I bet you could men-kampf a complete list of their tweets and statements to demonstrate it quite clearly.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 08:26 AM
3

I already did give a few points, you haven't said anything except for a non-sequitur.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 08:24 AM
7

And if you repeat something for decades, sometimes you lose sight of what it meant, what it means now, how it began, or even if it's applicable to the modern world, and it becomes a thought terminating cliché akin to brawndo being what plants crave.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 08:22 PM
16

I like the part where he was abusive. It's important to point that out when you stab someone in anger accidentally murder someone.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 06:58 PM
5

I've heard this maturation theory since forever but I don't buy it. It's unclear what it's even a metric of. To me it just seems like it's a way to say girls are better than boys.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 06:50 PM
7

Do you think homosexuals are trapped in the wrong body? They are nothing like women. Also how homosexuality is classified is, like anything, very political. I would call it a disorder, but then so is having an extra finger. I wouldn't treat someone differently, nor would I try to 'fix' them if they had an extra finger. But I would call it an abnormality. Why does the hormonal balance only supposedly affect the brain? The same hormones flow throughout the body and cause numerous changes. Why woul…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:32 PM
27

Probably the passing part is why it's so bad. If you transition and end up looking like some bizarre abomination like so many do, then you'd still get sympathy points for saying you're oppressed because people would still see you as a struggling girl trying to be a man. And woke points for being a posterchild for the trans movement, which seems to involve being obviously trans. But if you actually pass and look, act and sound like a man, that's the crippling blow because you lose all of that.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:12 PM
14

It may be real but I don't see any reason why it would correlate to being 'trapped in the wrong body'. That diagnosis reads like something from medieval times, akin to trapped spirits and folklore. It would be far more rational to assume it is a mental problem like so many others that people can suffer from. All too often does it actually turn out to be a defensive mechanism from some kind of trauma.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 01:05 PM
25

they aren't their biological gender Can't say there's much evidence to support this
/r/MensRights12/06/23 10:57 AM
15

Why would most statistics on suicide be surveys of living people? Generally statistics on suicide are compiled by counting people that have killed themselves.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 12:29 PM
-1

Sure, but that's just what the statistics said when I looked them up.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 02:23 PM
3

It is what it is
/r/MensRights09/06/23 08:22 AM
8

15.5% of primary school teachers are men, many of them being in senior positions like head/deputy head
/r/MensRights09/06/23 08:19 AM
9

You need a lawyer and as much audio and video evidence as you can possibly manage
/r/MensRights03/06/23 12:17 PM
1

Make believe might make you feel better, but that is not the objective aim of life, otherwise we'd just do drugs all day until we overdosed. People have their own views on life, and generally giving someone the sentiment of oh well the life of your loved one isn't that valuable or that worth crying over, because they can just start again, is not a sentiment that most people would share. And it undermines people's attempts to make the most of what they have and make the world a better place for e…
/r/MensRights03/06/23 12:05 PM
81

Tim Hunt was another scientist that was cancelled, sexist remarks he allegedly made circled all social media, it was far too late that people realised that the quotes had been edited, and were taken completely out of context. Also cancelled was Alessandro Strumia, suspended from CERN, because he denied that physics suffers from a male gender bias and criticized affirmative-action policies during a presentation at the lab. As you'd expect for an Italian he said this: “I trust that the honest majo…
/r/MensRights03/06/23 11:13 AM
3

I mean the cognitive dissonance of thinking you're a good person is likely to occur when you don't realise you've done something wrong, for example you believe that killing a guy is no different to stepping on a bug, because in your eyes they are the same value
/r/MensRights02/06/23 06:09 PM
1

It does trivialise his life though a little, I can see why someone would be critical of that.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:25 PM
0

"Brawndo, it's got what plants crave" It will take a long time to break that social conditioning
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:23 PM
2

They always say they want that, there is no connection with their actions
/r/MensRights01/06/23 06:39 PM
19

dehumanised to the point that people don't even think of men as people
/r/MensRights01/06/23 06:35 PM
27

not all women Men need to...
/r/MensRights29/05/23 02:02 PM
2

Addams family the film the strong figure is 100% Morticia who keeps the family together and is the one making sure it keeps running smoothly.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 09:16 AM
14

Her husband was abusive I'm sure, just like all of the other ones
/r/MensRights28/05/23 05:49 PM
1

Those men are fucking bonkers They become less bonkers every day though
/r/MensRights24/05/23 08:45 AM
1

I thought that but the camera goes off after she kicks, almost like they decided right that's enough, time to administer some punches
/r/MensRights19/05/23 05:42 PM
3

Why did the video cut? Did they turn it off and beat the shit out of her and then turn it back on, because that's what it looked like
/r/MensRights19/05/23 05:16 PM
18

It was voted the worst place to live in the UK a few years back
/r/MensRights19/05/23 05:59 AM
6

Mine too. I paid a cleaner. He came around every fortnight for 1-2 hours and turned my depression nest into an immaculate home. I laugh at the idea that housework is even remotely taxing.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 08:22 PM
5

It's funny because if the roles were reversed you'd be absolutely wrecked for victim blaming
/r/MensRights18/05/23 12:39 PM
6

Although people are saying you have no chance, you do have a chance. Firstly because you have obvious injuries, it's unlikely anyone would consent to what happened to you. But secondly, it's incredibly unlikely that you're the first person this happened to. It sounds like you would need legal aid to get things going, the police would likely respond to a swift kick up the arse via a legal letter of your intentions and how they've seemingly done fuck all.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 12:38 PM
27

Surprised the BBC would publish this The lack of self awareness tho: "From a young age, boys are less likely to raise their hand in class to ask to speak, they are worse at waiting their turn to speak or engage in an activity, they are less likely to listen and pay attention before starting a project," says the study. And as they get older, boys are more likely to "start withdrawing in class and becoming disengaged". Jee, I wonder why if the classes and teaching styles are completely not tailore…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 11:27 PM
3

You'd be better off anonymously reporting the politicians in support of these laws, if you say that you're a distraught woman who was assaulted and you're terrified to come forward, the media would yum that up.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 08:48 AM
3

Justice is where a person that has committed a crime or evil act is tried and found guilty. Naming the accused beforehand does not change whether justice is delivered. So the phrase 'open justice' is completely meaningless.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 08:46 AM
1

Briffaults law
/r/MensRights05/05/23 10:52 PM
9

I read a study that quoted a doctor saying guys underreported their pain all the time, like a guy with a broken arm bone protruding and the doctor asked what pain on 1-10 scale and the guy was like '4'
/r/MensRights04/05/23 10:33 PM
168

Antifeminism isn't misogyny
/r/MensRights30/04/23 07:23 PM
5

Guessing he was 'abusive'
/r/MensRights29/04/23 08:30 PM
3

I think most of us are aware of them
/r/MensRights26/04/23 10:05 PM
16

Labour will do this and more to try and get more votes, headlines today are that they want to make spiking drinks illegal. Isn't it already illegal?! Yes. But they want to make it MORE illegal to protect the poor wimminz. A problem vastly blown out of proportion with a fix that will do fuck all
/r/MensRights25/04/23 10:21 PM
63

It won't be a riot, it'll just be a very gentle almost imperceptible collapse. Women will scream louder and louder to get men to act in ways that they want, and as more men simply choose not to interact with society in the way they want but instead just do their own thing, the birth rate will drop, and lots of women will be single and depressed. Will men be single and depressed too? Men are already depressed.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 10:32 AM
6

Hundreds of ways really, it seems clear that social media has given women an inflated sense of self-value, which means they don't settle until they are much older, by which point men are less interested in settling, resulting in childless depressed women in the late 30s/40s. This comes with a certain level of entitlement, fuelled by the media and the fact that everything is a push to put women on a pedestal. We've convinced women and society to consider women as divine beings so aggressively tha…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:10 PM
2

Bill Burr
/r/MensRights24/04/23 12:37 PM
0

You can absolutely influence it, we just need to change the way people are educated. The media makes a lot of money from telling women how to feel and that is the main issue IMO
/r/MensRights24/04/23 11:51 AM
5

Part of biology is also rising above your base instincts though. Obviously not every woman in the world hates short men. So the real question is, why, and how do we address that? And also, should we excuse this behaviour because of biology? Do we rob agency of women by saying they can't control themselves?
/r/MensRights24/04/23 09:30 AM
7

Until they try to be people and then the hate comes out.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 09:26 AM
11

My mother always points out that people are short as an attack on them. Every time the prime minister is mentioned, she always points out how he's a short little man and he has to wear shoes that add an inch to his height, like she's disgusted with the idea of him being short. Same with other people. Every time there's a comedian on she will make a comment about how all comedians are short so they became comedians to compensate for their feelings of inadequacy. That's when I point out Greg Davis…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 09:26 AM
2

Whether you should have or not is up to you. She may even have said no thanks. Or looked at you in terror, which would make you feel like shit. End of the day she could just have called a taxi or an uber or whatever.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:13 PM
1

But it's not true, we're not specifically 'designed' to do anything, we're just a product of evolution. Even within hunter-gatherer societies there would have been diversification. Some people would be tasked with construction, maintenance, toolmaking, animal skinning, defense, child rearing, leadership etc. Humans are pretty flexible as we know, on account of the fact I've never hunted or gathered in my life, and my job is to write computer software when computers barely existed when I was born…
/r/MensRights14/04/23 07:31 AM
2

An appeal to nature logical fallacy is where you try to assert that your argument is correct because it is natural. For example, eating mud is healthy because it is a natural product of mother earth. Your argument is that we weren't made to work for someone else, which is an appeal to what is 'natural'. But dying during labour was pretty natural as well a long time ago. What seems natural does not have any bearing on whether it is correct, true, or meaningful. His point is not an appeal to natur…
/r/MensRights13/04/23 10:37 PM
-7

Appeal to nature logical fallacy
/r/MensRights13/04/23 09:50 PM
13

Hilarious how the definitions of the words are completely wrong
/r/MensRights10/04/23 03:04 PM
5

Beta woman
/r/MensRights10/04/23 09:24 AM
2

It's not about numbers, it's about societal collapse. What happens to society when people get old and there's no pension. We'll end up in a situation where we have no money to support them. Where hospitals have to turn away people over 50 and say tough luck. Which will be pretty hard to deal with if it's your loved ones. The repercussions will be quite significant and it will probably lead to more of a wealth gap, and we'll end up with something pretty hellish, kinda like what the US is now with…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 12:06 PM
1

Well, not perpetuate the idea that mens struggles are their own fault I guess would be a good start. The burden always seems to be on them to fix their own issues. I am not sure why we accept that unquestioningly. You need to talk more, you need to open up, you need to change your priorities, always putting pressure on the guy, and for things that don't make sense for guys to do. Yet when it comes to women's problems, how dare you suggest the woman needs to change her own behaviour. Society need…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 11:35 PM
4

I think if you're thinking about coping mechanisms you've already gone too far, it would be like lamenting that children being repeatedly beaten by their parents need better ways to cope.... the problem is that they shouldn't be in such situations in the first place. I think a lot of men have ways to cope, we go for beers with friends or play world of warcraft with our guildmates, etc, the problem is that some issues can't be solved by simply coping your way through them. I read that 90% of men …
/r/MensRights07/04/23 03:18 PM
4

There's no such thing as an inaccurate view of what masculinity is. Anything a man does, any way a man feels, is masculinity. Because they are men. Men insult each other all the time, pretty much non-stop, it's part of being a man. Often it stops other men from engaging in activities that will cause people to dislike them. And since being a man is about climbing the social hierarchy, it's pretty useful. You can act however you want but people don't have to respect you. The ones bold enough to te…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:41 PM
4

The concept of pausing a career is baffling. How many people actually want to go to work for 8 hours a day vs. spending time with their kids and having someone else fund it? For this to be equitable, she should go back to work, and he should get custody of the children. That way they switch roles, she gets the golden opportunity to go and work 8 hours a day to 'boost her career', and he gets to suffer terribly by being paid to raise his kids.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 08:27 AM
0

Just look at the bbc news, literally any day, any time, like 30-60% of stuff on the news page is about women being victims
/r/MensRights01/04/23 03:03 PM
6

Nah that's America, they have more knife crime than the UK
/r/MensRights01/04/23 01:12 AM
2

He felt like he wanted to do it, that's literally enough, this is the most transphobic thing I ever read im literally shaking rn
/r/MensRights31/03/23 04:10 PM
21

I am curious to know if they'd give you condoms though, under free birth control. But I suppose those would beneficial to women anyway. I wonder if you qualify for a free vasectomy.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 08:16 PM
10

This sounds transphobic to me.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:51 PM
12

Presumably if she chooses to identify as a woman, then she is trans, because that is what I'm told trans is. The reasons behind it are not important.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:51 PM
78

Presumably you're now a birth carrier or whatever ridiculous words they've come up with
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:49 PM
49

That's fair enough, I was ready to be angry about someone raping a child but because that person was called nasty names for having done it, plus put some money in the charity box, we'll call it even - society
/r/MensRights24/03/23 03:32 PM
10

The "beyond a reasonable doubt" is misleading though, it doesn't necessarily mean they almost got him but couldn't quite prove it enough. Basically every case that has ever been dropped has been dropped because they couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it occurred. For example, because it was complete fiction. But I can see people reading it as we almost got him but he slipped away.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:24 AM
19

They're in a fun spot now, having got rid of him for something he didn't do. I wonder if there could be a legal case for unfair dismissal, if they take what's basically his IP and run with it
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:19 AM
20

Isn't it great how false accusation cases only ever emerge when the person has done it several times to different people. If someone falsely accuses you pray that you're not the first 5 people they did it to so you might get a shred of justice.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:56 PM
9

I agree with you and you have written that very well. There was an article recently in The Times about how basically kids learn what's right and wrong by trying things, that includes jumping off a wall, letting someone punch you in the face, and all kinds of other stupid kid behaviour, which also includes awkward fumbling and perhaps trying to hug a girl or similar. But the repercussions of that now, unwanted touching or teasing etc. are so great they basically act like what you described as col…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:54 PM
2

It's worse because they assume men want to express their feelings and in a manner that they deem suitable. Would be wise for feminists to stop telling people what men want, and let them have a voice.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 12:06 PM
16

I'd go one step further and say that if we need more mental health services and have a mental health crisis, it's already too late. It's like complaining we don't have enough trauma centres for bear attacks when the real problem is we keep letting people get mauled by bears in the first place. If you want to fix incel culture try shaming and punishing people financially instead of rewarding them that have children they can't look after, that hook up with tinder date after tinder date and devasta…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 10:11 AM
31

Plus men feel an innate need to provide, and so work crazy overtime, with overtime shooting up after the birth of a child
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:31 PM
2

Fixed it for you
/r/MensRights17/03/23 12:40 PM
3

Yeah I sure did
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:17 AM
30

Equality in the form of take jobs from hard working men and give them to less qualified women so that we have a more even gender mix
/r/MensRights14/03/23 08:59 AM
-4

I'd say that you asked for it to be given to anyone but they made a comment about men and women and just gave it to him, perhaps they are the misogynjsts
/r/MensRights12/03/23 01:07 PM
9

He wasn't convicted of rape either, despite what people say. Just from a purely legal perspective. He was done for three counts of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 11:42 AM
1

Is Joss Whedon really a bad guy? The only drama I read was that one person in buffy said he was very strict
/r/MensRights10/03/23 07:34 PM
1

Just wait until GFE AI comes out soon.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 09:30 AM
35

This sounds like the Apex Fallacy Also another way to phrase that title "Men still run 89% of countries, 81% of all companies.." is that men are responsible for running everything and making sure it all works. That's a big responsibility. Gotta put a lot of work in for that to happen. Not just to run it, but to actually build it in the first place, and keep building it. Sure would be nice to let someone else have that responsibility. Maybe 2X should stop autobanning people, and they'd get a genu…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:57 PM
1

While improving educational opportunities for girls globally continues to be of paramount importance to achieve gender equality in and through education, this focus on achieving gender parity and equality must not ignore boys. lol
/r/MensRights16/02/23 11:16 AM
5

This has been petitioned before, it reached enough signatures to discuss it and the government said 'lol no'
/r/MensRights16/02/23 11:03 AM
1

Yeah but those people are doing it for religious or cultural reasons. The enlightened folk in the west are completely against FGM, but will use the excuse that it helps HIV to justify it being done to boys. The point being that if that's their logic, that it reduces HIV, then they should be OK with it done to women for the same reason. Which highlights that they don't have noble intentions at all, they just don't give a shit about it happening to boys
/r/MensRights14/02/23 09:58 AM
1

Nah, they use it an excuse to mutilate boys. Suddenly when someone says 'actually that works on girls too' they try to delete the study off the internet, probably threatening the careers of the people that conducted it.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:44 AM
1

Mutilation seems like a pretty strong word in itself
/r/MensRights12/02/23 06:49 PM
1

Stop trying to compare things with rape, it's not a competition. FGM is not rape, no. Use the right words to describe things rather than try to sensationalise, because sensationalising things quickly leads to people becoming desensitised to issues. Hyperbole doesn't do anyone any favours.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 06:09 PM
1

I disagree and think you should reserve the word rape that are for things that are actually rape. Because now you're in a situation where you say "He was raped" and you don't know if that means someone had sex with him against his will, or a doctor performed a routine surgery at the behest of his parents. And it means people will think 'rape' to mean 'violation of the genitals' which would mean someone burning another person's dick in a fight is also rape. Once everything is rape, nothing is rap…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 11:33 AM
1

Nope, it's actually true. There was a study about it, I think Harvard, but it was mostly scrubbed off the internet because of the backlash.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:33 PM
1

FGM reduces the transmission of HIV as well, so that's probably also a good idea, right
/r/MensRights11/02/23 11:46 AM
1

I agree but I wish people would stop using the word 'rape' for things that are not rape, it dilutes the meaning
/r/MensRights11/02/23 11:44 AM
8

Nothing I say will convince you that I genuinely care about the injustices men face Lots of things will convince me, like taking positive actions or discussing the problems that men face, and engaging with others. What won't convince me is making a post in which you describe men in incredibly villainous terms, and attack the members of this group for exhibiting all those evil behaviours you have described men as having.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:44 PM
3

I don't think the opening sentence has any meaning or weight, the post isn't about a comparison, it felt like a throwaway comment. The post addresses the group with a loaded question logical fallacy. I understand wanting to distance yourself from women due to past trauma, but I don’t think heading down a road of misogyny is the best way to go about it. Like, I'm not. Neither are you probably. In fact, almost no-one is. But the post tars the entire group with multiple accusations and statements o…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:33 PM
3

That's literally what a concern troll does. I read through your post history and you seem to be really cool, I like the things you've posted, but you are really toxic towards women. I think people like you and I need to do better with our attitudes. I think you're great and you can really shine, just need to make a few adjustments, wouldn't you agree? I really want the best for everyone.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:39 PM
26

You say 'we' like you are part of the group, but you have inserted yourself and are now trying to control the actions of others.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:33 PM
4

I explained quite clearly in my other posts. You can google 'concern troll' if you want to understand more. This is the most textbook case I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:25 PM
8

I would say if you have a problem you should be talking to the moderators, or explaining we need more moderation. Not opening your post with 2 paragraphs about how men generalise, abuse, and sexually assault women, followed by a concern troll post trying to get people to agree.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:23 PM
8

Really, which part of the OP says the other side is screwing up? It says men are generalising women as cold midandrist harpies, and that men tell them to shu up and kill themselves, and they've been SA'd by a man. In order to push that across without people saying wrong place, you just have to say "However I'm really rooting for you guys!" and suddenly we forget that, and even have people agreeing. Then feminists go hey check out this thread where men agree they're horrible to women a lot. It do…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:22 PM
14

That's how concern trolls operate, they try to win trust by appealing to how they 'just want to help'. And men want women to come and help and agree so they upvote. They don't realise the nefarious nature of the concern troll, which is why it's quite effective. You've already admitted in your other post that you're new here. So you thought the best way to start joining and being supportive of a community was to make a post about how it's toxic? This is what concern trolls do.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 10:29 AM
23

Great. So why did you feel the need to make this post? If you saw something you didn't like, you could have responded to it directly, or messaged the moderators. Instead, you chose to grandstand in a subreddit you even admit you barely participate in. You should delete your own post if you care so much about men's rights as you claim, because it's a concern troll post that damages the community.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 10:08 AM
6

It's classic concern troll behaviour, to pretend to be innocent on every reply. "What do you mean?" is concern troll 101. Seriously mods need to nuke this thread and ban this user.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 10:06 AM
16

No, it's not. This is just a concern troll post trying to make it sound like it is to paint a bigger target on the subreddit. "Look how many people agree that it's toxic!"
/r/MensRights09/02/23 10:04 AM
26

If someone comes here and posts 'you guys all suck you keep belittling women' then people will realise it's a troll and downvote/delete. So to get past this, a concern troll pretends to be part of the community ("I'm a woman that's an avid supporter of men's rights") who posts that they appreciate what's happening, but that they have some 'concerns'. They then proceed to post the same 'you guys all suck you keep belittling women' message, but they package it up like they're on your side and just…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 10:01 AM
25

concern troll There's a post like this every week and a bunch of women chime in saying yeah this sub is full of people saying bad things. Mods should delete concern troll posts like this
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:16 AM
4

Yes, I never said it wasn't real. It's just always used as a reason to absolve women of responsibility whenever there is a case like this.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 09:40 PM
5

Yeah but it's trotted out like one every time something bad happens
/r/MensRights08/02/23 09:19 PM
17

I'd be happy to cut it. I have a non-compete though, therefore I can't charge you. Also I have no skill in cutting women's hair, but I'm happy to give it a go if you want any male haircut that I specialise in. If you want me to attempt something else you're going to have to sign a waiver saying that you understand you're asking for something outside of my skillset, and that the results may be less than satisfactory. Then give her a buzz cut
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:53 PM
3

I disagree with his comments about men making demands of women to look a certain way in the past and monopolising companies to produce products to make women look how they want them to look. I think this removes agency from women. I think woman have a natural drive to compete with each other to look good. That's why you often see some awful fake nails eyelashes and orange tan, no man wants that, but women are competing with other women and between them they think that's what they want to aspire …
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:51 AM
2

Just the understanding that women cry a lot under stress automatically, that includes the stress of being found out, it's like a hedgehog rolling into a ball, it's automatic. If we acknowledged this is an evolutionary defence to mess with people's feelings and took measures to overcome it, then we could have less biased courts. Unfortunately it also manipulates everybody watching and involved, which means if you aren't lenient then other people will think you're being unfair
/r/MensRights04/02/23 09:28 AM
52

She'll cry and get off scott free, claiming she was abused and forced to do it, the people that manipulated if male will suffer some penalty, is the absolute best case scenario you can hope for
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:39 PM
1

I mean, have you tried using it? Simply trying to persuade it to say something mean and it repeatedly refusing shows that the developers have tampered with it. Obviously it's going to be perfectly capable of spewing hate given that's what humans are kinda famous for. But they've overridden this capability with their own programming. I suppose I should clarify that by 'canned response' I don't mean a static string of text, but the response is always the same, that it won't do it, just tailored to…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 03:34 PM
6

there is no concept of a predefined response I don't understand, you can ask it all kinds of things and get a canned response back. Example That response is an override put in. You could get around them in various bizarre ways, but I just tried and they've closed the loopholes I used before
/r/MensRights02/02/23 11:01 AM
16

That's patently not true though, as it will deliberately avoid certain topics. However if you keep badgering it and phrase your questions correctly you're able to peek behind the curtain and get it to contradict the overrides that were programmed in
/r/MensRights02/02/23 09:56 AM
13

Depends on the country, in the UK no such thing exists, but I read in parts of Canada it can be as little as 3 months cohabitation
/r/MensRights30/01/23 10:04 PM
1

That's not necessarily correct, anyone that runs or owns their own business is generally in a convoluted way, paid hourly (or daily). Eg tradies like plumbers, decorators, electricians etc that work independently will charge per hour, and people who work as consultants, e.g. me working as a contract software engineer, will charge per day of 7.5 hours.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 06:56 PM
71

I'm guessing tax breaks, but you could view that as an insurance payment for not getting absolutely dicked on by divorce
/r/MensRights30/01/23 06:53 PM
3

I expect in general they won't meet the requirements for strenuous activity, but actually I don't know if they'd have to go through a type of basic training
/r/MensRights28/01/23 11:15 PM
30

The next level of concession will be that they'll do it but only the easy jobs away from harm, I expect. I would imagine a lot of military service is also civic service and involves logistics, moving heavy things around, deploying field tents etc.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 11:10 AM
1

I mean you unironically think that this: The average working conditions and daily life of a black plantation slave were extremely harsh and brutal. Slaves were forced to work long hours in the fields, often in extreme heat and with little rest. They were provided with minimal food and clothing, and were subject to frequent beatings and other forms of physical abuse. Slaves were also separated from their families, and were not allowed to leave the plantation without permission. They were also den…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 06:53 PM
23

I like how the very first link to a group of people speaking out about the mistreatment of men is to freaking 4chan claim that misandry is widespread, established in the preferential treatment of women, and shown by discrimination against men. This viewpoint is denied by most sociologists, anthropologists and scholars of gender studies who counter that misandry is not at all established as a cultural institution, nor is it equivalent to misogyny which is many times more prevalent in scope, far m…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 01:49 PM
1

Most of the world has compulsory education https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_education , for good reason, we don't want people growing up in abject poverty because they can't read and write and thus can't do anything to provide for themselves or contribute to society. Military service varies by country, it's obvious that if mandatory service applies that not everyone will be able to fulfil a military role, and if you're not at war there will be even less roles, but there are lots of other…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 10:49 AM
1

How depressing. You can go out and find meaning and a reason to live and succeed, but it sounds like you'd rather wallow in self-pity.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 10:46 AM
-1

If he would be forced to, then yes, I'm sure a black plantation slave would find it similar. This is a joke right
/r/MensRights27/01/23 10:43 AM
4

I understand they do that because they know they can get police and everyone else on their side, but still, if you antagonize and harass someone, that person might do serious damage to you before any help arrives.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 12:33 AM
8

cosmo lol
/r/MensRights27/01/23 12:31 AM
1

No one wants to work and no one asked to be here. Saddest take I've ever seen. People get a lot of satisfaction and meaning out of life by creating things and helping the lives of others. There's a lot of information about it. You should check out Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. People get very depressed if they can't do things like realise their potential or take on a burden of responsibility.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 12:10 AM
2

You don't because you're a child, but your parents can be fined and jailed. You get something back for doing military service as well, the fact that everyone else does it and performs actions that improve the community. Just like when you pay taxes and it goes to things that improve the community.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 12:08 AM
-1

I don't think so, but their point also extended to mandatory military service being unfree labour and performing it doesn't have society catering to the whims of the people performing it. But it's a job, like other jobs. I wouldn't say my regular job prevents me from doing anything I listed. There's no reason other than money, which may limit but not remove a few options, that you cannot enjoy those things while your job is military service, in general.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 07:51 PM
0

It's LITERALLY not though. Military service, while it may involve some elements of compulsion, is not unfree labor because it is performed as a civic duty rather than as a means of generating profit. The purpose of mandatory military service is to ensure the defense and security of a country and its citizens. It is a way for individuals to contribute to the well-being of their community and to repay their debt to society. Additionally, in most countries with mandatory military service, there are…
/r/MensRights26/01/23 07:48 PM
0

It refers to the idea that individuals have an obligation to contribute to the well-being of the community as a whole. This can take many forms, such as paying taxes, participating in civic activities, or serving in the military. As for why it's men, it's because historically that has been the division of responsibility in society. Times have changed, and therefore so should this practice. As we can see from this article, change is underway, however it's very slow and it may take a long time in …
/r/MensRights26/01/23 07:46 PM
-6

Right now I'm warm, clothed, have a choice of anything I want to eat, can pick up my phone and look up anything I want to look up, talk to literally anyone I know in seconds, receive literally any service I wish for, from someone to come and build me a garage to someone to bring me any food drink or item that I wish for. If I'm in distress I can call for an ambulance, police, fire brigade, coastguard, I can phone a number for medical advice, I can watch virtually any film I want, and listen to a…
/r/MensRights26/01/23 07:36 PM
-7

The person is saying that mandatory military service and wartime draft, the bottom line is both are slavery. I bet if you took a black plantation slave and told him he could live in a society that catered to his whims in exchange for doing a year of mandatory military service he wouldn't even be able to tell the difference. /s
/r/MensRights26/01/23 07:18 PM
-6

Bottom line is that its slavery Bruh. No. Next you'll be saying school is slavery because you have to go. Paying taxes is slavery. Having to work to stay alive is slavery. /r/noworking
/r/MensRights26/01/23 05:24 PM
2

Mine did too, don't think it's that weird
/r/MensRights25/01/23 12:34 PM
5

I don't even think that they believe it holds women back, I think they feel it empowers them. Women can be astronauts and CEOs if we bring in quotas, and if we shit on white males for their so-called privilege. I think they're oblivious to the fact that the eventually result is people view women as diversity hires who didn't earn their place in the world, including the ones that actually are hard-earned astronauts and CEOs. I agree with that as well, the problem there is they use whatever metric…
/r/MensRights21/01/23 07:42 PM
14

I don't think it's intended to, it exists because it gives women power, because people care about women and women's issues. Men are biologically drawn to helping them, so it takes quite a bit of effort to ignore this instinct when what they want help with is BS
/r/MensRights21/01/23 07:13 PM
10

You think recommendations are based on what you'd enjoy the most. Heh. Just like everything else, they're based on what they want to push to their audience the most. You might not want to watch it, but they want you to know it exists.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 05:29 PM
13

In cases where men have groomed underage girls, the girls also feel like they hit the jackpot, that is the whole point of grooming vs abduction and kidnapping. The last major case here that I can remember between a teacher and an underage girl, the court revealed text messages of them both messaging each other with how much they love each other and how excited they are about spending time with each other etc. I'm sure the 13 year old girl also felt she had hit the jackpot. Obviously, this isn't …
/r/MensRights18/01/23 01:46 PM
8

Have a little chat with the Daily Mail, they like to publish articles about stuff like this.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:33 PM
1

Often happens, when they shut down a subreddit, people from it try to find the next closest thing and go there. So often banning one subreddit can ruin a couple of others.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:53 PM
1

That's what most people will tell you it means if you ask them though. Feminism means to address inequality by tackling issues that face women, and it should be about restoring the status quo, so there's no supremacy involved. Obviously, the reality of how it plays out is pretty bad, but that's the minority affecting the mostly disinterested majority.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 05:19 PM
1

Equality for women? Sounds reasonable to me, on the surface.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 03:15 PM
1

It's not about stupidity, most people just believe what sounds reasonable. If I told someone that Japan has 200 different flavours of kit-kat, there's no reason they wouldn't believe me. It sounds reasonable. Perhaps they've even heard someone else mention it. It doesn't make the person stupid if they believe me or don't believe me. And it's something that no-one will care about enough to do some intense fact checking. It's just a kind of passive behaviour that allows a minority to start passing…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 02:14 PM
5

Clearly they shouldn't be though!
/r/MensRights29/12/22 11:11 AM
1

This isn't quite no true scotsman, I think there are a lot of people who say they're feminists believing what they're saying is that a few things suck for women and they'd like to see those things improved, but it's just a belief they have when asked, not something they think about or do anything about. These are the people that are swayed by the hardcore feminists, when the hardcore ones say Jordan Peterson is a bad man who hates women, these passive feminists go 'ok' and just believe it. Many …
/r/MensRights29/12/22 11:09 AM
1

Indeed, perhaps it would do some good for people to lose their safety net for the day. Know that if you car won't start, your kitchen floods, your electric goes out, your toilet won't flush, you're attacked or robbed, your house burns down, you are taken ill, you need to get somewhere by taxi, bus, or train, that you're absolutely out of luck as no-one will be available to even hear your cries for help nevermind do anything about it...
/r/MensRights27/12/22 09:51 AM
1

The Witcher managed a few rng anti man rants, particularly liked the one where Yennifer rants on the beach when in the previous scene several innocent guardsmen that were simply escorting a highborne woman had just been eviscerated as expendable fodder like it's nothing. She complains that as a girl, they're "just vessels", despite the fact men are just murdered continuously throughout the show and their deaths are mostly meaningless. Despite the fact the most powerful characters in the show are…
/r/MensRights24/12/22 01:12 PM
17

I think you absolutely can fetishise Asian women. I went to live over there for a while, and before I arrived I thought the vast majority of Asian girls were very attractive. However after living there for a while, you realise that's not the case and there are still attractive and unattractive ones. Your brain kinda rewires itself. Whenever new people moved to the country, you'd notice they thought everyone was attractive, probably because they're new and exotic, but it fades after a while. If y…
/r/MensRights24/12/22 11:14 AM
6

"All these things might be true but we have to remember the patriarchy!"
/r/MensRights24/12/22 11:11 AM
1

Try to find one netflix original series where a woman doesn't accuse a man of mansplaining lol
/r/MensRights24/12/22 11:10 AM
5

Even if you don't, if he spoke up or complained about the lack of consent or being punched... I don't think it would go well for him
/r/MensRights22/12/22 06:45 PM
27

We do not blame a soufflé for burning when the oven is on full, it is the temperature that is the problem. Men are the soufflé of suicide. They will kill themselves if the stress gets too high. The solution is not to blame them, the solution is to turn down the heat.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:59 PM
5

Personally, I disagree, also that wouldn't make them losers of evolution if they let every chad they can find plough them
/r/MensRights13/12/22 11:14 PM
15

Like all things connected to feminism every word has two or more meanings so they can hide behind the most convenient definition. Incel technically means someone that is unsuccessful in the sexual marketplace, usually due to their appearance (short, fat, scars, ugly) but also due to their lack of social skill. Technically, their personality is not connected to their status, they can be nicest man in the world but if they're 5' high and ugly, they will struggle fiercely and may consider themselve…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 04:04 PM
9

I disagree but that is off topic
/r/MensRights12/12/22 10:35 PM
65

as long as there are also resources for men as well. lol, we know that's not going to happen
/r/MensRights12/12/22 05:06 PM
70

'Oopsie I accidentally said that he hit me'
/r/MensRights05/12/22 10:00 AM
20

If she's married as you said then her husband and her have joint assets, so there is absolutely going to be money you can go after.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 09:15 AM
28

Blackmail. (1)A person is guilty of blackmail if, with a view to gain for himself or another or with intent to cause loss to another, he makes any unwarranted demand with menaces; and for this purpose a demand with menaces is unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief— (a)that he has reasonable grounds for making the demand; and (b)that the use of the menaces is a proper means of reinforcing the demand. (2)The nature of the act or omission demanded is immaterial, and it is als…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 05:29 PM
89

I think that one day this might backfire
/r/MensRights20/11/22 01:16 PM
74

I would love to see where they go to find a company that offers sensitivity training to women. What are the chances the company they use to provide that training lectures them for 2 hours on how men need to be more respectful.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 05:37 PM
1

Again, I'm not talking specifically about the minister, I am talking about all staff under the quota, it's literally in the title of the post. I just used the minister of defense herself as an example.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 05:34 PM
1

But the guy in the video as well as you think she isn’t qualified because she has a vagina. No, people in general will think women are probably less qualified if there is a gender quota involved. That's my one and only point. Seems obvious doesn't it, if you need to force people to be hired because merit alone does not get them there, that those in such a job are likely not qualified enough for the job. Women who attained their position through hard work and merit will have those accomplishments…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 04:34 PM
1

What's the criteria for being chosen, experience? Skill? Having a pair of breasts? It's pretty obvious what I'm saying here. The person who will be best in the role should be appointed, not the person who is second best because they have breasts. If the gender part is irrelevant, we don't need the quota. Besides this is not just about that person's position but it's about every role that falls under the quota.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 03:34 PM
1

Nominated, hired, what's the difference - are they gonna choose me to be the federal minister? Or does it require some level of skill and ability. Your last comment is plain stupid, you can't identify a gender based on a tiny snippet of work history, no. Fortunately, people aren't hired or appointed based on tiny snippets of their work history though are they? If you wanna show me that in order to get the job or appointment, all they did was fax that paragraph in and get the job, then sure, but …
/r/MensRights18/11/22 03:15 PM
2

I assume that the three men hired competed with other people to get the job and were hired based on being most suitable for the job. If a gender quota is in play, then it's more than likely that a male candidate was more suitable for the job, but was rejected due to having the wrong genetalia. Because if the woman really was hired over male applicants because she outshone them, then there wouldn't be a need for a gender quota in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 02:31 PM
1

I don't know, it's not my field of expertise. But I know what doesn't affect suitability, and that's what's between your legs. So making it a criteria is wrong. May as well say most people in parliament have brown hair, there are no people with red hair, so let's ensure we prioritise red hair colour over academic background and specific experience.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 01:44 PM
1

That's an atrocious way to tell if someone is qualified or not. All you're saying is these people studied law, graduated, and worked int he field. Flopping how many years you did a job on the table is a terrible measure of competency. If you look at anyone over the age of 40 you're likely going to find they have 20 years of experience doing whatever they learned at or just after university. Yet how suitable they are to do a job cannot simply be determined by the number of years worked. Derrick t…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:47 PM
8

Great plan, we should ask the women that support this if they actually have any skill and experience at all in politics or if they were just hired because they have a vagina. And if they get offended at that, well by instituting quotas that is what every single woman is going to be asked - if they're lucky, they'll be asked directly and they can perhaps defend that they weren't just hired to meet a quota... But the vast VAST majority will not be asked, instead people will just assume, or they wi…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 01:13 AM
9

People are actively hostile to everyone in gaming, and to people on the internet in general. When insulting it is their purpose to find something that will do maximum damage, so if you're a woman you'll be mocked for being a woman, if you're a boy you'll be mocked for being a boy, your voice, how you talk, how you look, anything to get under your skin. You get a lot of victim points as a woman for taking every insult and death threat as a sexist attack. Totalbiscuit wrote a tweet about how many …
/r/MensRights17/11/22 01:41 PM
16

Plus now they can say it was shut down because of the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights15/11/22 06:51 AM
39

The media sells papers like hot cakes by scaring women, which makes them click to read the article. It's an endless cycle of this. Just look at the BBC news where usually the majority of non headline stories and articles are about women suffering and men being bad.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:55 PM
6

Young lads blowing their brains out at an alarming rate might be one such example that society is geared to offer no support network for men while it continues to demonise them in many ways including the manner in this thread.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:38 AM
6

Yeah that's ridiculous isn't it, what about "Mr Fensome who likes puppies and once painted a rainbow"
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:33 AM
1

It's not about that, it's about pointing out that women shouldn't be rolling their eyes going ugh men who cares, because even if they're man hating feminists they should be able to at least acknowledge that working to solve this issue will benefit them as well.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:32 AM
15

100% in victims of SA's interest as well. Every false claim makes it harder for people to believe women.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 03:35 PM
40

And from the article they link themselves about her arrest: Mr Fensome, a 6ft 8in heavy metal fan, was arrested, charged and held in custody for 36 days before police confirmed he had clear alibis for the dates of the alleged rapes. Nor does the buzzfeed article mention how she faked her injuries. Somehow it paints her as the victim. Amazing.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 03:32 PM
21

Video evidence is key, nobody will side with him when she breaks down and cries about things she has invented that he has done, he will 100% be the villain regardless of what he says. The only solution is to show irrefutable video or audio evidence.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:07 AM
6

This is a bit poorly argued I'm afraid, if you're going the statistics route, posting the actual statistics and staying on message would be the best thing you could do short of not engaging. If you wanted to demonstrate under-reporting you can also post the statistic on the same page of the CDC report that shows numbers drop after 12 months, because men simply have to let it go and can't let it define them because they won't get sympathy for it. There's no point in saying things like underreport…
/r/MensRights04/11/22 05:37 PM
20

Last stats I looked at showed many more men in the UK are subjected to acid attacks than women, not what you'd expect given the media
/r/MensRights02/11/22 01:00 PM
17

Just need to straight up /r/menkampf it. Or just replace men with black men. Black men, keep your distance: the closer you are, the more threatening you seem. If you're a black man walking or running behind a woman, pause to give her some space, or cross the road so you aren't behind her any more. Understand that women's wariness and suspicion of black men isn't personal, so don't be offended. Women have no way of knowing that a black man is not a threat. Black men, don't make comments, even if …
/r/MensRights31/10/22 06:22 PM
1

That's great, you can create a will, and if you change your mind for whatever reason that's also fine you can change your will. However creating a binding document that you can't change, not knowing what the next 5, 10, 20 years will have in store for you, that is not good at all.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 08:19 PM
1

4. Partner insists on it
/r/MensRights30/10/22 08:16 PM
3

You don't have to be so extreme. Go for someone who is attractive and confident, but check for other red flags first. Guys just want someone who isn't fat that is fun to be around, they're not really very picky. They can see bitter man haters a mile away though. why do you think so many women are convinced that men are sociopaths? It's not many, but it's clearly who you hang around with. Women like this tend to convince themselves they're the victims and it's all men's fault to absolve them of a…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 09:10 AM
4

I believe when it is portrayed and utilized as it’s supposed to be it will help everyone They said the same thing about communism and look how that worked out. Your ideas about what feminism is are not connected to reality. If you want to write on paper that feminism is about equality and helps everyone, great. But feminism in the real world is not at all what you have written down. All of that stuff you've written about women 'figuring out who they are' is bullshit, feminism does the opposite a…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 01:41 AM
6

You don't think pushing a heavy strong narrative to exclude people contributes to them being taken seriously? What about if I auto banned black men, don't you think spreading a culture of shunning and ostracising black men might just make people not want to take them seriously? And not even the extremists - it would absolutely influence your average punter if they look around and see it's normal to ban black men because whatever they have to say is not worth listening to because they're black me…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 01:18 AM
13

Downvoted for troll-level post lol Feminists are not the reason men aren’t believed when they’re sexually assaulted. Really, explain why all reddit feminist subreddits (2x, askfeminists, feminists etc) will auto-ban men and will not entertain any post containing anything concerning men as victims, including in neutral posts that examine both men/women without any bias towards either in the same post. Just posting on here about SA will get you banned from those subreddits automatically. Almost li…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 08:56 PM
2

The best line in that was It's not necessarily that men aren't doing these things, it's that the men you're choosing aren't doing these things
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:39 AM
3

And yet if a girl was thinking about going to college and every single poster, leaflet, brochure and advertisment was of male students there, people would see that as a problem...
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:58 AM
3

I don't know, but I expect that custody in the UK is as biased as anywhere else
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:05 PM
9

Men stopped women from entering positions of power for years. Men kept you out of harms way and away from difficult work. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:15 PM
10

We have this system, at least in the UK, it's called don't get married and they aren't entitled to anything whatsoever. The only money would be for child support.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:14 PM
3

The funny part is how obvious this is and how it's perfectly common sense... But if you flip it around, that's literally what hundreds of organisations do to men
/r/MensRights14/10/22 04:01 PM
102

The article is very scant on the details, and given the guardian is ultra feminist, those details are probably not good for their narrative
/r/MensRights06/10/22 09:57 AM
1

Straw man. Yes, in comparison to other applicants. I assume they are not the best candidates for the job compared to the other people that apply otherwise they'd be hired and there'd be no need for a quota. That's not the same as saying women lack the skills and experience to do it. However, given the criticism raised in this case of the candidate having zero experience in the field and minimal knowledge of the area into which she was hired, it seems like even that may not be true. The sexism pa…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:45 PM
8

We would assume the gender quota is put in place because women lack the skills and experience required to get the job otherwise
/r/MensRights02/10/22 10:18 AM
46

This is likely the correct answer, as much as I think it's fucked up in many cases. Once married you're going to be entitled to half of everything accrued while married, so the last 12 years. This prevents a situation where one person chooses to raise the kids and the other chooses to work, and then the person raising the kids gets nothing upon separation.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 02:30 PM
11

Bizarre, how would a judge handle that? Either she lied about the abuse or she is happy to share custody with a child abuser. Neither would make her a fit parent.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 08:33 AM
9

Men cry less when we beat them with sticks, so we'll keep doing that and be nicer to women
/r/MensRights25/09/22 12:25 PM
3

Yeah, what's best for the child is the child being born 10 years later to a stable family
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:35 PM
2

I would simply ensure you have enthusiastic text messages, and install a doorbell that records footage like a ring, try to record some affectionate activity on camera and be sure to record them leaving amicably. During sex say something like 'do you like it when I do x?' or 'you like that?' in a playful way. If you can get verbal consent during the act it will make it less ambiguous. Especially if it's not her that thinks you're bad, but maybe her toxic friends convince her that she wasn't reall…
/r/MensRights24/09/22 05:55 PM
3

Who cares what you deserve, what matters is being prudent and protecting yourself. If you've ever felt nervous at night because of a man walking nearby, then you're exactly the same as OP. That man doesn't deserve to be treated as a potential rapist because of a small minority of shitty men.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 05:53 PM
39

Or if they just dressed as a man. Go right ahead, dress up like a man. Not like anyone would know you were a woman if you wore a baggy hoodie at night. Feel safe yet?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 09:31 AM
19

Galbrush paradox right there
/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:34 PM
3

No they don't. Even those who purely stick to the dictionary definition don't. The advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes. There isn't a person in the world that wouldn't say feminism has a focus on equality for women. Then actual feminism is how it manifests. Just like Christianity from a theoretical point of view and Christianity from an actual point of view of how it's practised and implemented are not the same thing.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 11:23 AM
6

Yeah, you're not trying to convince them, you're just parading your views alongside theirs and letting the other silent readers draw their own conclusions. Reddit is full of hugboxes though so chances are you're not talking to people without a heavy agenda already
/r/MensRights19/09/22 05:59 PM
21

I expect a bot will automatically remove your post and ban you, it's what usually happens, so it would be a waste of effort
/r/MensRights17/09/22 03:21 PM
52

I've done recruitment before and I've had to argue with directors not to hire women in software development. Many job applications we receive are either terrible or just not to the standard we need. If they are women applying however they always got an interview, and I've had it multiple times where they've tried to argue we should hire them and they can 'learn on the job' just because they're women. We get 1 female CV to every 15-20 male CVs usually. I'm like, they have 6 months experience usin…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 07:39 AM
2

His arguments revolve around doing what's best to raise morally healthy capable children. So whatever promotes that the most is what he seems to advocate. Makes sense. Mostly it seems a problem of single parents, and people whoring it up resulting in multiple absent fathers. The idea of debauchery in modern society, tinder, keeping kids you can't afford etc are some of the problems. As is the rise of incel culture, unhappy men that want a loving stable relationship but can't find one in a societ…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:16 AM
2

Yes, that's my point, people call it a berry when scientifically it's not, same thing with tomato being a fruit or a vegetable. The studies say things like "wo/men exhibit less of a specific form of fast-facial recognition" and then the headline of the news articles is that "wo/men have less empathy". Strictly technically, that might be sort of correct, but it's the distinction from an empathetic trait and empathy in general that means it's misleading. It's like saying Skinny Steve is physically…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:56 AM
1

The study makes no mention of what I think to be correct
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:06 AM
2

Strawberry literally has berry in the name, must be a berry, does no-one read? Speaking of reading, here's the first line of what I wrote above repeated: I was looking into some of these studies recently. What they call empathy is not necessarily what we would assume empathy to be. HTHBIDI
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:05 AM
3

Is a tomato a fruit or a vegetable? Is a strawberry a berry? There are multiple definitions of many things, usually what a textbook might use in a specific context and what people hearing the word might use, but other contexts as well, like people misusing a word like 'nimrod' thinking it's bad when it's supposed to be good, etc. I don't think sympathy necessarily requires placing yourself in someone's situation in the colloquial sense, it's just as the dictionary says, "feelings of pity and sor…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:31 PM
9

Nah, I'm describing empathy, sympathy is generally when something bad happens. But I can be empathetic to someone who isn't suffering misfortune. If someone is confused, happy, bewildered, laughing etc understanding why or how they're feeling is empathy. The difference you're describing is probably some scientific definition which is why it's misleading outside of a scientific context. Sometimes sympathetic means a shared emotion, like sympathetic pain. People reading 'wo/men are more empathetic…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:07 PM
38

I was looking into some of these studies recently. What they call empathy is not necessarily what we would assume empathy to be. I think empathy requires a degree of rational thinking, which babies and small children are mostly physically incapable of doing until they develop it. Putting yourself in another's shoes, or taking risks to save another, I think are significantly more prominent in men than women, but they wouldn't be classed as empathy under those situations. Your italics would sugges…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:07 PM
2

This is what it's really about. I googled Australian reading lists and I can't see anything out of the ordinary, everything I expected to be on there was on there. I'm learning french and my god is reading dumb stories generally about young children travelling to france is so dull as an adult. I got a fantasy choose your own adventure book and it took me 3 days to get through the first few pages, cataloguing and building flash cards for every new word, but now a couple of weeks in I can understa…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:47 AM
10

Men need to grow up and control their emotions. I forgot how this is my fault
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:25 PM
1

Apparently we don't though, that's the tragedy, this wonderful division of labour and child rearing has gone to shit. Society would function significantly better if we did have women raising kids and taking care of people (or at least, assuming one of the two roles of performing labour or child rearing), but to even suggest such a thing is misogyny, whereas ensuring the men are coughing their lungs up in the coal mines is completely expected.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 09:58 PM
5

It's bs "Historically, women needed men to provide for them and to protect them." Not historically, the same applies today. We all need men, to build roads, sweep chimneys, unblock toilets, basically do everything you can imagine. You need men and so do I
/r/MensRights29/08/22 01:56 PM
2

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/808343/criminal-injuries-compensation-scheme-2012.pdf Page 69 lists the monetary amounts Page 3 states this: A person may be eligible for an award under this Scheme whether or not the incident giving rise to the criminal injury to which their application relates has resulted in the conviction of an assailant in any part of the United Kingdom or elsewhere.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:20 AM
1

Just a few years behind the UK in terms of seeing what the government can get away with. We have senior government people parting until 3am coked up, rife drug use, partying during lockdown and completely and utterly unaccountable for their actions
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:04 AM
67

Apparently I wake up every morning consenting
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:38 PM
71

Ironically, he isn't having sex. How dare you not do the thing I said you shouldn't do!
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:37 PM
3

Yes, and just take one look at modern mens rights issues and think the people we're opposing are the ones raising their children
/r/MensRights24/08/22 09:31 PM
6

Well put.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 09:24 PM
29

Really, you approved of the message it gave to them?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 01:08 AM
9

He was abusive, she was under a lot of pressure, etc
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:33 PM
8

Yes, I will be leaving the country in a year or two. The country is failing and I can't see any way realistically that it can improve because the government isn't held to account for anything it does.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 05:29 PM
20

It's something that's potentially going to be pushed through soon https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/04/public-sexual-harassment-could-become-criminal-offence-in-england-and-wales Basically what's stopping it is the fact our police force is in complete shambles as it's chronically underfunded, and if they push this through it will be put even more strain on them as people report the crime of being looked at on the train or whatever. The country is going down the shitter but the governmen…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 04:38 PM
40

Yep here's a list of consequences:
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:24 PM
11

The main thing I hear is that they will try to trip you up about if you're a good parent or not. Do you know what your kid does at school, how they're performing, what they like, who their favourite superhero is etc. And do you know what their blood type is, their allergies, when they last went to the doctor, how many cavities they've had, things like that. Often the woman in the relationship takes care of these kind of things (usually because the man is working 40 hours a week), so it's a fanta…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:51 PM
2

I mean the rebuttal is literally in the title of the post
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:41 PM
1

Yeah you're getting some messages like this but honestly I did the same thing while applying for a job. I approached people who worked/worked in the past at a role and asked them about it, and they gave me a lot of good information about working there.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:40 PM
3

How can a vet deal with dog and cat problems when they're not a dog or a cat
/r/MensRights06/08/22 09:33 AM
2

I think we both know that more than one woman was assaulted by a stranger or acquaintance in the UK. And I think we both know that an incident can spark a larger conversation (like a high profile murder triggering a larger conversation about harassment and assault). The fact that this woman's murder caused other women to come forward and discuss their fears, how certain interactions make them uncomfortable, etc is a weird thing to chalk up to "hysteria" - women have been talking about catcalling…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 09:21 AM
2

I've found this kind of jump to conclusions is common among MRAs and it might be why you hear "don't harass women" and jump to "we must be afraid of every possible interaction" It does sound a bit like, one woman was murdered in London (Sarah Everard), we must be afraid of every possible interaction doesn't it. How about that. Except it's somewhat more common, men don't really care for emotional hysteria, only logical hysteria based on probabilities. What I said: men aren't properly taught emoti…
/r/MensRights02/08/22 11:12 PM
3

mfw tomb raider one of the best known games of all time
/r/MensRights02/08/22 05:54 PM
7

Was great in witcher, the ep with the child, where the mother rants about women being treated unfairly and men having all the power where in the previous scene several completely innocent guards escorting her wagon were slaughtered violently without a second's thought. Yeah, real tough being a woman.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:44 PM
15

Same thing happened at the end of Django Unchained <warning gore> literally the guy is screaming on the floor blood gushing out, meanwhile look at the woman's death (spoilers, watch it if you haven't its a good film). She's shot, no blood, her body just disappears off screen.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:16 PM
1

The first major issue is that the legal side of it is only part of the worry. Before we even look at that, we have to consider the non-legal ramifications. I don't think people are shying away from engaging with women purely on technical legal grounds alone. Nobody wants to be a pariah because they said the wrong thing (e.g. "hello, I like your hat") to the wrong woman. The hyper-vigilance caused by the constant barrage of media messages telling women to be scared and demonising all men means th…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:25 PM
1

If I didn't read stories of people's intentions being misconstrued near constantly on reddit and occasionally in the media, I'd be inclined to agree. How would you summarise those, how about 'unwanted harassment'? That's how they summed it up where I live, and displayed it in a list: unwanted - flirting, catcalling, compliments, hugs, jokes, touching, little kisses, attention, staring, photos, drinking, out-numbering a woman, grinding, grabbing or groping. This list is displayed around my city o…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 07:57 PM
1

The implication is that it serves to further make the prospect of approaching a woman more daunting, even with the best of intentions. Whereas the actual assholes the law is trying to fix were ignoring it before and will ignore it now. It creates an air of hypersensitivity around dating where one misstep could be misconstrued and have rather serious consequences.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 07:01 PM
5

Next month "Why do only assholes approach me?"
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:14 AM
6

Bizarre, not really sure why it matters if the person was made uncomfortable. If I want to say I love your titties, do I get a free pass if I say oh I didn't want to make you feel uncomfortable, it was a compliment?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:57 AM
20

I think it's not quite like that. If the women quit in your scenario it's brave and they deserve better. If the men quit they are weak and pathetic and need to man up. I wouldn't say the men haven't been programmed to see themselves as victims, I think they can see it but they just can't do or say anything about it without society dicking on them even more
/r/MensRights29/07/22 07:21 AM
2

Yes, all the single men out there clearly aren't cooking, cleaning, doing laundry and housework while simultaneously working a job.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 12:59 PM
15

I'm sure a guy that strangles his wife is probably depressed as well
/r/MensRights28/07/22 12:39 PM
1

Always dismissed by simply asking, "What have you done to fix your situation?" Let me guess, tried nothing
/r/MensRights26/07/22 09:58 PM
4

This has been petitioned before and the petition failed, generic wishy washy response.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:39 PM
1

Good reply, I mean how else would you interpret it? Imagine an advert for period relief painkilling medication, that said "He's not the one menstruating" with a picture of a woman on it taking to relieve her period cramps. Would you suggest that the advert doesn't suggest only women are menstruating (ignoring the bs trans gender politics) and that it's applicable to both genders? Of course not! So they are idiots.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 09:15 PM
6

Either trolling or doomed
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:07 PM
2

I thought Brave was a pretty mediocre movie but the one part that I liked was when she was attacked by a monster by surprise and her first reaction was to nail it with an arrow rather than scream. I often think about how cool that was, considering the trope of women and danger. That was the most girl power thing I've seen in Disney and it was a one second thing of no other significance.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 03:31 PM
2

I don't think it quite gets to the crux of the problem, it suggests to me that women are as strong as men and can beat them up. I don't think anyone is going to relate to this poster. I also don't like the way it says women can be 'just as bad as men', it's a poor way to frame it because it's starting with the conception that men are bad. I also think picking a guy that looks like a bruiser like Phil Mitchell doesn't help. Why not put a nerdy dad type instead? The poster needs to convey that whi…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:58 AM
8

I feel the only way to succeed as a man these days is to be irreplaceable. They can't put a gender quota in if there are no female candidates. Go into something technical, engineering or construction. Not everyone wants to do that but unless you do you risk being replaced by someone worse because they have a vagina or they're brown.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:07 PM
1

The book doesn't frame it that way, I'd also say it's a must read for every man. A nice guy in the book is someone that bends over backwards to please their partner, and when they partner shows signs of disrespecting them, doubling down and trying even harder to be nice, but nothing is ever good enough. It's written by a marriage counsellor, and the takeaway is that women are attracted to guys that set boundaries and are independent. They want to test their partner and receive pushback, to know …
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:19 PM
21

That's how you respond to inequality. Not by saying fake news. Yeah but literally ever sociologist and social equity report says otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:05 AM
12

How about this report https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222499/
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:00 AM
27

Women still face adversity and challenges in most countries not in developed countries
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:45 AM
41

'Exceeding the parity benchmark', you'd think the benchmark would be 50%/50% but I suppose the benchmark is actually 100%/0%
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:44 AM
1

Canada is a fucking disaster for relationships
/r/MensRights09/07/22 11:10 PM
28

Sexist hate starts with men ?
/r/MensRights09/07/22 11:07 PM
9

Biggest "bro culture" I can picture is jacked dudes lifting heavy at the gym. Pretty intimidating, even for me. And yet somehow whenever I go I see FEMALES there. It's like they wanted to go to the gym and they pushed through the discomfort, because they're adults and are capable of rationalising that just because they are not the stereotypical demographic they can still participate.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:18 PM
9

One thing that's different these days is if you're feeling down on your luck, like this guy, that people will shit all over you if you voice your problem. People will just go 'ew incel', like being unhappy or concerned that you've not been dealt the best hand for the dating marketplace is comparable to people that actively want to rape and berate women. I hope you find what you're looking for, it usually starts with becoming happy as you are, and then that self-confidence is visible to other peo…
/r/MensRights11/01/22 04:53 PM
3

Yes, but his lawsuit, which is a very good read and is on Google somewhere or other, reveals a lot of the culture and how it was a purity spiral / echo chamber of people pushing diversity and hating on the white males. Even if the person that read it was sympathetic it would be career suicide to try and float it as an idea in such an environment
/r/MensRights12/12/21 01:22 AM
6

unless your beliefs are super woke
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:49 PM
5

Why do you think women were disadvantaged in previous years? What are previous years? 1914-1918 were previous years, for example, during which a lot of men ran across the battlefield and were mowed down by machine guns, over and over.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:16 PM
2

You will have to define what you mean by rape. Legally it is not possible in the UK or the US as rape is only something men do. It would probably fall under sexual assault or unwanted sexual contact.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:13 PM
2

Why? The only task worth pursuing would be removing hurdles to men. Anything else is pointless.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:10 PM
12

Just read James damore's lawsuit and you'll see the types of people that work at Google, you don't have a snowball's chance in hell
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:08 PM
2

Keep up the good work! /r/1200isplenty
/r/MGTOW216/06/21 12:46 PM
2

You can't control where you lose fat on your body, the only way to reduce it is to reduce your calorific intake so you start losing weight overall. Keep lifting heavy during this period and most of it will be fat loss rather than muscle. You can find a million guides on how to do it right, generally you eat 500 calories below maintenance and use a TDEE calculator to work that out. I would say weight lifting in general has nothing in common with weight loss. If you want to lose weight it's 90% yo…
/r/MGTOW216/06/21 11:27 AM
2

Sounds like Greasing The Groove / Hypertrophy vs Power tbh If you do a workout like PHUL or PHAT then it's basically alternating this but without spending hours doing it. We've seen from studies that you don't need to push through failure to get maximum benefit, so if you're doing sets and you can't make the last rep that's absolutely fine you can just stop, there's no noticable benefit to forcing out the last rep or lowering the weight and forcing it out. If you want to look good then hypertrop…
/r/MGTOW216/06/21 11:22 AM
1

You're not married when you get divorced out of your home, that was my point. Plenty of reading material for you here on divorce: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_Victorian_era#Divorce_and_legal_discrimination Domestic violence and abuse The law regarded men as persons, and legal recognition of women's rights as autonomous persons would be a slow process, and would not be fully accomplished until well into the 20th century (in Canada, women achieved legal recognition through the "Perso…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:12 PM
1

Just because one person got away with it doesn't mean everyone does, I'm talking about social exile as well as the difficulty a housewife cum spinster would have in getting any kind of job etc. There's a big incentive not to fuck it up. What days do YOU think those were? We're talking around 100 years ago, maybe slightly less. Just take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magdalene_asylum
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:01 PM
1

Well it's never going to be a utopia but I mean in generally being treated with respect, and expectations levied on people to stick to their gender roles or face big consequences Gone are the days when if you decide to cheat on your husband you get kicked to the kerb and die holding your baby in the middle of some filthy hovel having frozen to death
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:48 PM
1

Ahhhh I see! In that case, I agree. Sorry, I thought you meant first-wave/second-wave, I guess that's working-class feminism - the lower class watching TV and starting to see lead female roles for the first time.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:37 PM
1

Which part is a myth, sorry?
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:31 PM
1

Well, as far as attitudes go I think that is as utopian as it gets, working hard, coming home to a doting wife and family that holds you in high regard. If you mean going even further into hero worship or something, then I don't think it will go that far. So perhaps it won't go entirely opposite, it's a wonky pendulum :)
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:22 PM
-3

Not early feminists, second wave feminists. First wave feminists were about empowering women by saying women can achieve the same greatness that men are achieving. Second wave feminism which was much later was about saying women are oppressed and their ability to achieve greatness is because men are holding them back and imprisoning and controlling them. The former, if you work hard you succeed. The latter, no hard work is required, just complaining about society forever because you'll never suc…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:16 PM
0

Well, we're talking about attitudes here, generally the classic housewife trope of the man has the shitty job working 12 hours down the mines therefore his wife will ensure he is comfortable upon arriving home and the house and meals are in order. That was at least an attitude of respect and appreciation for the hard work he puts in.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:14 PM
0

You're gonna have to add some context for me to understand what you're trying to say here
/r/MensRights06/06/21 05:18 PM
5

I think it's a pendulum, it swings into this new 'woke' culture and it continues to get worse and worse until eventually the toxic effects become obvious to normal women and society, and then journalism makes more money reversing the news trend. This already seems to have happened for the Daily Mail, a sensationalist news outlet in the UK that is known to play fast and loose with the truth. It makes money from outrage, and it used to be that outrage was the evil CIS white male doing something 'm…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 02:07 PM
17

I don't think so. The early feminist movement in the 40s and 50s was about empowerment of women and it achieved this perfectly well without attacking or demonising men in any way. It's much more recently than girl power became at the expense of men and involved their dehumanisation. It's a shame because people used to recognise the sacrifices and hardships that men endure, but these days they still reap the benefits of them but trivialise them.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 01:55 PM
1

Your trash boyfriend right? And if your kids are boys, I suppose they'd be trash too. Poor fella. Kids will grow up thinking they're monsters just for being born male. And that feeling is what this very post is talking about. The irony is that your behaviour would probably drive your own kids, if they are boys, to this very topic of discussion, maybe even to participate on here one day.
/r/MensRights04/03/21 10:18 AM
1

Perhaps bookmark it and read it in 5 years
/r/MensRights04/03/21 09:40 AM
2

It's important for discourse to let people's opinions be heard. There is no reason to ban you when the downvoting does the job, although you might be removed for such childish antics as spamming 'men are trash' over and over. This is why the feminist subreddits turn into a big echo chamber, because they ban discourse and just rehash their own views over and over without any outside influence or input. By a greater extension, it happens in society too. There has been a lot of no platforming of me…
/r/MensRights04/03/21 09:33 AM
2

To think that affirmative action would probably land you a government role...
/r/MensRights04/03/21 09:24 AM
3

If ants are the most dominant species in the world having colonised every landmass, my house must be full of ants right?
/r/MensRights04/03/21 09:23 AM
3

Exactly, someone can tell you to shut up but you're free to keep on calling men trash without consequence. Try posting onto twitter, instagram, or any female centric subreddit that women are trash though, and you'll find you're swiftly banned. A woman calling men trash is considered sassy and empowered. A man calling women trash is considered to be an incel or potentially rapist/serial killer.
/r/MensRights04/03/21 09:19 AM
3

Not just sitcoms. I am tired of kung fu girls. Enola Holmes was interesting but she was a Mary Sue who was able to fight a trained killer in hand to hand with her kung fu.
/r/MensRights04/03/21 09:15 AM
0

Columbo always takes a pity on female murderers and treats them differently than male murderers That's not true. He only lets TWO murderers escape, one because she literally lost her mind through neurological disease and couldn't even remember, and one because he took pity on the female murderer (whom he still arrested and charged with murder) and spared her daughter, in exchange for a confession. In fact, he has some incredible lines especially in the episode with the female author, where she a…
/r/MensRights15/12/20 06:13 PM
4

The whole thing reads like he got off on a technicality, and he's really totally guilty except they couldn't quite push it through the pesky law. Even when you win, you lose.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 06:09 PM
1

No, you should express your opinions, even if people disagree they are still valid. I mean, look at me, how many posts do you think I've made that have been downvoted to oblivion lol. Sooooooo many. I have to delete my post history periodically because feminists will literally dox me and try to get my fired from my job, ffs. I still speak my mind though. And I've been banned from so many subreddits for it, all the feminist ones, and theredpill, mgtow, and a couple of other male ones because they…
/r/MensRights11/12/20 05:00 PM
1

The winning move is not to play lol
/r/MensRights11/12/20 04:54 PM
1

You'll get downvoted but you won't get banned. You're still free to express your opinions. That's one of the key things that separates feminists and MRAs. One group will try to ruin you, your life, your career, your image, and get you banned, your comments deleted etc. The other one will just downvote to show disagreement. I don't think men believe they're the only victims but generally a subreddit about men's rights is going to focus on issues where men are the primary victims of a situation, s…
/r/MensRights11/12/20 04:53 PM
0

I think that only applies if you're forcefully raped and you're unable to fight back
/r/MensRights06/12/20 07:28 PM
2

I'd agree, really the damage isn't the fact you might be hurt physically as OP describes, the real damage is the betrayal of trust. When you're underage you can't consent, that means, you don't have the capability to decide for yourself and you automatically rely on other people to make decisions for you. If you require medical treatment when you're 14, you rely on your parents to consent. If they're not available, you rely on the doctors to make the best decision for you. If you're being taken …
/r/MensRights06/12/20 04:59 PM
1

If an article is blatantly wrong and has a clear agenda from the outset, I can't in good faith believe anything else it writes. The proclivity to do so has been nicknamed the Gell-Mann amnesia effect. You can type 'gender pay gap myth' into google or youtube and see literally thousands of articles explaining it. Here's my favourite though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDj_bN0L8XM The articles you linked... The first article is based on this Stamford study, which doesn't draw any of your concl…
/r/MensRights05/12/20 11:36 AM
1

The forbes article opens with the gender wage gap, about how it's caused by sexism and discrimination. This has been debunked a million times and nobody will take anyone seriously that attempts to talk about it. I am on mobile and it's the middle of the night, I'll take a look later at finding some credible information. I suspect some of this is self reported data as well, one of the studies referenced was in one of the links you gave before, and later down the page it was discredited as not bei…
/r/MensRights05/12/20 06:16 AM
1

That's not what you said. You said women do more than their fair share. also that doesn't read like a scientific article, more like a huffpo piece on why men are bad. The more scientific one talks about how women are trending to more egalitarian division of duties. I'd stick to proper sources, they are much clearer. Try the last one you linked, it's very good.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:55 AM
1

I did and I did not read that. Which one says it?
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:47 AM
1

How strange, I read the articles you linked but they don't match what you've said at all. Did you just pluck them randomly from a Google search? The last one is really interesting. I recommend reading it properly. It talks about how hours in childcare have changed for both sexes and the reasons for various trends of housework and similar. My cursory search said conflict and arguing was about women being bored or feeling stuck in a relationship. The links you sent don't mention anything to suppor…
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:33 AM
1

By being sexist, you automatically do. Sorry. You're contributing to the problem. It's like saying I'm a racist but I don't support racism.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 05:56 PM
1

So much anti-male policy comes from a place of women's feelings. Part of life is overcoming personal bias and forcing yourself to act rationally. For example, a person might find the sight of two men kissing each other to be unpleasant. But they shouldn't let that feeling mean all gay people are bad and start supporting anti-gay policies.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 05:42 PM
1

It's bullshit The most commonly reported major contributors to divorce were lack of commitment, infidelity, and conflict/arguing. source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012696/ Other articles on google suggest that boredom is the main reason women initiate divorce
/r/MensRights04/12/20 05:39 PM
1

male activists people call these 'incels' effortless to undermine someone trying to elicit change if you put them into an undesirable hated group.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 11:25 AM
11

How are you going to do fishing and hunting and camping with two kids and a baby on the way
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/20 01:23 PM
1

Our welfare system is really messed up then isn't it? I lose my $100,000/year job the state should be providing me with welfare to maintain my standard of living
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:41 PM
46

Yeah, one of the top comments My take: Women have been gaslit about their experiences of abuse for pretty much all of human history. MeToo only exists to correct this. We live in an era where corporations don’t care about who was/wasn’t abused, they care about not losing social capital due to being on the wrong side of changing social norms. Always comes back to the idea that women need special treatment because they were historically so oppressed, yaknow, by being kept out of harms way while th…
/r/MensRights08/11/20 12:30 AM
35

"Buy our razors ya rapist" - the ad
/r/MensRights01/11/20 06:19 PM
1

just because they're not achievable without stripping rights away or implementing some sort of dystopian future doesn't mean we shouldn't strive to make it happen. Think that logic speaks for itself
/r/MensRights10/09/20 08:45 PM
1

Okay, well, I've explained how it's a terrible goal to strive for that because it's not achievable. Now you're adding the qualifier without stripping people of freedoms of course. What do you mean, 'of course'. How else are you going to achieve this goal? The answer is that there isn't another way. That's why it's a silly goal. Based on your last paragraph it seems your goal is to take steps to reduce crime. That's a good goal. Eliminate 100% of all crime, that's a bad goal. Make it 100% safe al…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 08:08 PM
2

why on earth is striving toward a world where anyone can walk anywhere at any time and be safe a terrible goal? wtf? Because trying to make the world a nice cosy safe place is exactly what feminism in the 50s and 60s fought to rid women of. Giving women a curfew. Keeping them 'safe'. Restricting what they were allowed to do, removing them from harm's way. With extra protection comes a loss of agency and freedom. This is what they used to fight against - give us the freedom to take on the risks t…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 07:32 PM
3

Everyone should be able to freely walk anywhere at any time of the day without being harmed. That is an impossible thing to achieve. It's also a terrible goal. If someone is walking out late at night in a shady area, it's still not their fault if they're violently attacked. This is the argument that crops up every time people debate this kind of thing. 'Fault' is a very ambiguous thing. You'd have to define what it means before you can claim it's 'not their fault'. It always gets smooshed togeth…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 03:13 PM
1

I think it's half being unrealistic and half that men weigh up the risks and take responsibility. If I got assaulted walking in a dodgy area at midnight I'd blame myself for doing it as much as I'd blame the attacker. Women like this would 100% blame society and not their own actions.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:55 AM
10

I'd say she'd never get in a miata, but the reality is she'd probably never get out
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/09/20 09:48 AM
3

"How many of them swiped right because they thought a fat chick would be more likely to put out?" Job done
/r/MensRights02/09/20 03:14 PM
1

On the face of it, you might think there's a lot of creepy guys out there that might try to adopt a girl to abuse them. But when you actually think a bit more, I would assume (and hope) there's a lengthy and intensive vetting process involved in adoption including wellness checks and such, that applies to anyone who adopts regardless of gender. You're not just handing kids to paedophiles, I hope. And anyone wanting to adopt should have their motives questioned regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 07:15 AM
0

I think your comment above was misleading, it sounded like you didn't want men to have any parental leave. Here in the UK you're allowed to share part of it, however when my sister tried to do this, it was a giant pain because they were not at all expecting it or versed in the rules, it took a lot of effort to sort out.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 08:55 PM
1

Oh, so no to her being sued it's just the sun? that's disappointing The guy above said she was being sued so tbh I dunno what to believe
/r/MensRights16/07/20 02:54 PM
1

Ah, thanks. Its hard to know which is which because it seems they are connected
/r/MensRights15/07/20 12:52 PM
1

is he fighting in court for two things at the same time then?
/r/MensRights15/07/20 12:37 PM
3

Well, eventually if we HAVE to, otherwise whats a little stabbing here and there? Besides it only takes 15 false claims before anything is actually done.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 10:15 AM
3

Had to wonder which of them got the three and a half years
/r/MensRights07/07/20 10:57 PM
1

If you're gonna keep men as slaves you'd just keep breeding stock. The problem is gender roles, biologically men tend to lead and women tend to follow, if a man asserts himself as a leader women (and other men) will naturally form a hierarchy with him at the top. Considering being the only man to do this would put him at the top of the hierarchy, he would be very attractive to women, many of whom would have strong emotional feelings towards him due to their biology. After that you have a problem…
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/20 05:47 PM
3

nthing unless u poke too dep then u wil pok the baby
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/20 05:40 PM
2

Even if you care you're not gonna intervene, too risky
/r/MensRights16/06/20 01:50 PM
6

If you spend 5 minutes reading /r/AreTheStraightsOK you kinda start seeing this stuff that's normalised as really harmful. I think it's a bit different when you joke about "make a sandwich". It's either an obviously sexist 'joke' (i.e. not really a joke unless you're a sexist pos), belittling women like we often see in TV/movies, eg. the sexist CEO ignores the qualified woman in the room, instead asks her to go fetch the drinks, or it's a way of teasing women that you're friends with, e.g. a fri…
/r/MensRights13/06/20 09:36 AM
14

6 years old tweet lol
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/20 10:56 AM
1

You could play a game where you list these headlines/titles like on the right, and you have to guess if the associated photo is wearing a pair of glasses that have pointy bits on the top corners
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/20 09:06 AM
4

It represents the problem of the stage that comes after projecting yourself in a sexual manner and being unhappy about people receiving that projection and reacting to it. Onc You can listen to Camille Paglia talk about it, this is where she talks about clothing specifically but the whole thing is worth listening to, although she does say the word 'okay' a lot. A TLDR is that you need to accept the world is full of nutjobs and primitive beasts, dress and act appropriate to that, don't whine and …
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/20 11:52 PM
2

I'm fairly sure it's also that hate speech (encouraging violence against a protected class) is a criminal offense, so you could file a police report too.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 09:11 PM
4

What's with the results? 56,30,00,000 ? comma horror! I hate stuff like this anyway, it's clearly right in correcting you since there isn't a national commission for men. If you search "national committee for women" it corrects to Including results for national commission for women Just another complaint against algorithms and common sense that undermines purpose
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/20 05:52 PM
1

The explanation might, but actually banning people because of their activity on other subreddits is insane
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 07:42 PM
1

Everyone that says they got banned for X actually just got automatically banned for having posts on non-approved subreddits.
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 07:21 PM
2

What do you do when your toilet doesn't flush? First you call a plumber, except they're almost entirely men. Then you give up and use another toilet elsewhere. Except that toilet is broken too. So then you realise it's a sanitation engineering problem, except almost all of the sanitation engineers are male. But you're lucky enough to find enough to fix the problem in your part of the city. Except it's a pipe that's underground, and almost all of the construction crews capable of digging the road…
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 11:42 AM
7

Easy I'll just submit the article to the news team I'm sure they'll jump right on it.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 11:20 AM
2

Could you tell us about the book? What sort of changes did you make to your approach?
/r/MensRights23/04/20 09:49 AM
18

I should add, don't bring the wage gap into it. If you didn't mention it in your essay, don't bring it up. The argument isn't that the stuff in the essay is the ONLY discrimination people face, it's just examples of it to show how it affects all people. Only provide sources for what you've said in the essay.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 10:19 PM
57

Best reply would to simply say that you don't believe you've been graded fairly, please see the attached peer reviewed studies that back-up everything I've said. Don't engage, just back-up what you've said, with the above. In theory, even if what you've written is wrong, provided you have evidence that it is true, they should be grading your ability to research, find reputable sources, and summarise them in essay form. You could write about bee fucking for all the content matters provided you do…
/r/MensRights20/04/20 09:22 PM
14

I'm sure the 2 months weekend house arrest will do wonders
/r/MensRights08/04/20 09:07 PM
1

Yes, in theory. It should ensure that two people doing the same identical job will get paid the same, even if their genders are different. Since this is a no brainer, there is no harm in having a law for it. In Theory........ In reality, it causes a few problems. For example, every major supermarket in the UK is involved in a tough legal battle at the moment because the checkout staff (mostly girls) get paid less than the warehouse staff (mostly boys), who argue that their jobs are equivalently …
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:45 PM
1

She will get what's coming to her, though. X: Doubt
/r/MensRights02/04/20 11:33 AM
1

Not even that, it's just someone's blog in the form of a subreddit.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/03/20 07:08 PM
41

I guess the difference is their intent, boy scouts was an extracurricular club for boys that are interested in adventure and camping. If they want to make a girls version, then that's great. I believe there is one, girl guides or brownies. But if an educational institution wants to offer more opportunity to one gender than the other, then that's completely different. That's an internal bias, bad enough as it is but as a public institution, even worse. I suppose a parallel would be if boy scouts …
/r/MensRights27/03/20 06:21 PM
1

"Yes, we know."
/r/MensRights11/03/20 10:52 PM
1

https://imgur.com/sI41KuG.png
/r/MensRights08/03/20 09:43 PM
11

Fuck the person, sure, but you only owe what was taken from you. If he took the 10k and set fire to it, you'd still be entitled to only $10k that was stolen to be paid back, not millions. Likewise if he took 10k, bet it all and lost, you wouldn't be owed the 10k debt it created. Or if I stole $10k off you and bought a gold statue worth 10k, you couldn't come after me for the statue, you could only come after me for 10k. If I didn't pay, you might be able to get the baliffs to claim my assets to …
/r/MGTOW07/03/20 07:43 PM
2

I don't get why that is either. Is it a recent thing? Because there's also a trend of dying your hair "silver". They call it silver, but it's actually like white/grey and it makes you look like a 75 year old woman. I have no idea what the appeal is but it looks terrible on young people. This is the nicest example I can find but yeah
/r/MGTOW07/03/20 11:07 AM
4

Can't tell if this is a troll or very sad. If it's true then the problem is likely that you don't have any hobbies or interests of your own beyond trying to pursuing people. Even ugly girls are attractive when they're in shape. And people who are fun to be around and have a variety of hobbies and interests, who are good at those, are interesting people that people would like to date.
/r/MGTOW07/03/20 11:02 AM
3

The top comment is always about how men think they like girls with no makeup, but they're actually too stupid to realise they're wearing subtle makeup. Honestly I have dated people who looked hot without makeup on, and some cases better (more 'real'). How do I know? Cos girls take their makeup off before they go to bed, and amazingly, I have woken up next to them in the morning. It's another one of those collective delusions where you're not allowed to like girls without makeup, presumably becau…
/r/MGTOW06/03/20 04:58 PM
3

It's mostly lack of outcome independence. You can be a sad fat nerd but if you behave how you want to behave without caring about what other people think of you, you're not a simp. You do things based on what you want to do, not what other people expect you to do, or to get the reaction you think other people would want to have. This of course, does not preclude you from being insufferable, gross, or an asshole.
/r/MGTOW06/03/20 04:54 PM
8

I agree. With funding cut I suspect they'll start to go full clickbait daily mail to keep the numbers up.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 10:52 AM
5

Thanks. I guess I was thinking parent on child violence statistics but I suppose actually the article is talking about witnessing domestic abuse, despite the women 'shielding her child' from abuse in one of the examples.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 10:51 AM
1

I'm not sure who you'd blame more, herself for probably having little to offer someone for a woman of her age, or all the guys who fail to impress her by being insecure and pathetic.
/r/MGTOW06/03/20 12:07 AM
1

I know, and I'm saying thank you. I wasn't sure what the fallacy was.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 11:46 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights05/03/20 06:57 PM
1

thanks that clears up my confusion!
/r/MensRights05/03/20 04:51 PM
1

One counterpoint I thought up is that while a tiny a percentage of men control a lot of money, they also control a lot of power. The president of the US and many world leaders (putin, kim jong, etc) are all male. So the idea that the patriarchy is men controlling the world is kinda true in that sense.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 02:31 PM
6

That's not sexist, that's honest. The sexist part is if the judge goes 'amirite guys' then does nothing about it.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 06:13 PM
5

Damn, that's two octaves more than human hearing
/r/MensRights01/03/20 09:42 PM
12

got em
/r/MensRights27/02/20 04:39 PM
–

imma punch this docile tiger a bunch and see what happens wtf it bit me
/r/MensRights23/02/20 03:46 PM
–

I'm pretty sure the girls enjoy it as well, judging from how they're groomed and showered with gifts and affection and enjoy it, and genuinely believe that they're in love. Of course, it's a completely fucked up deception, but the idea that they were forced against their will is wrong when it comes to grooming.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:52 PM
5

The council-ran pool has a women-only timeslot every week My gym has a women-only area and some women-only classes.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:35 PM
9

Bizarre, don't see him much but many years ago he was the guy saying the things he's mocking. I heard him on Bill Burr's podcast and he was talking all about it.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen17/02/20 05:24 PM
4

I don't think anyone wants to watch a 41 minute video with a cold opening to understand an internet comment lol
/r/MensRights10/02/20 08:21 PM
3

Does reddit not allow mods to edit titles?
/r/MensRights10/02/20 08:20 PM
2

Most permanent employees are happy if they get a 2% raise every year. So you're competing with them. Management would rather replace you with someone who is happy with that than give you a raise equal to your value. They're also paranoid that nowhere else will hire them. Most of them with good reason as they do nothing to keep their skills up, just coasting by instead. So if you jump you can get what you're worth.
/r/MGTOW07/02/20 03:37 PM
2

I've never been promoted either, and I don't think promotion is a good thing usually. It is better to improve yourself, get more skills, and become more valuable, and then to be aggressive in about securing better positions that let you grow. I always view being promoted a bit like people view blue pill Nice Guy 'simps' as described here, that maybe if you're a Good Boy then management might fling you a few scraps now and then. My career involves me leaving every company after 6-12 months to go …
/r/MGTOW07/02/20 11:29 AM
4

I wonder if this diversity narrative will ever be reversed, and portrayed as, "Women and minorities not interested in helping [coronavirus], while males pick up the slack"
/r/MGTOW07/02/20 10:58 AM
1

I read the content without reading the title, and I thought I wonder how OP described this, and then I chuckled because it's such a succinct description.
/r/MGTOW05/02/20 08:01 PM
1

Why not confront the man, or the management?
/r/MGTOW02/02/20 10:36 PM
10

You'd think so but not in the eyes of people who are thinking 'gottem, that incel had it coming and you showed him'
/r/FeminismStopsWhen30/01/20 09:36 PM
10

/r/justdependathings
/r/MGTOW27/01/20 11:59 PM
25

I didn't see the thread but let me guess, men need to cry a lot and talk about their feelings, and basically emasculate themselves
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 12:49 PM
4

I'd like to wager 5 nibbly dollars that she bans him from seeing you and says this is all your fault, for poisoning his mind
/r/MGTOW23/01/20 05:53 PM
2

Analogies don't seem to work either with women either. Can guarantee if there's a reply it's someone saying "How dare you say robbery and rape are the same" or "How dare you say being raped is like having something stolen from your house"
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/01/20 11:46 PM
1

It's an automatic ban, anyone that posts there is automatically banned from that subreddit and sister subreddits if their post history has any posts in mensrights / redpill / mgtow / etc.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 11:21 PM
1

I think the myth comes from if she decides to tell the police he abused her and gets a restraining order, something that lawyers hint at wink wink nudge nudge have been known to encourage women to say. He gets booted out. She's the primary carer of the kids, while he's living in a motel room. Obviously, better for the kids to be in a stable house... Custody issues, she keeps the house, etc.
/r/MGTOW21/01/20 05:35 PM
1

Easier to just say "He wanted me to suck his dick!" Who cares if it's true, the lynch mob doesn't.
/r/MGTOW21/01/20 05:29 PM
2

Wonder if they'd give the money back if we could rewind time so they never went through with it.
/r/MGTOW21/01/20 11:11 AM
1

What country, Saudi Arabia?
/r/MGTOW20/01/20 06:13 PM
6

"Go to court, go to jail if you lose, and you'll probably lose, but confess to the thing you didn't do, and we'll give ya a small sentence. Justice!"
/r/MGTOW20/01/20 06:13 PM
2

The hamster wheel refers to finding a way to rationalise something, even though it usually involves bizarre nonsensical logic. I suppose the idea is there's a little hamster that powers the thought process. An example of the hamster wheel is wanting to sleep with someone on the first date, but finding it slutty and inappropriate to do so, therefore the only solution is to rationalise a situation where it's acceptable, for example by blaming the man for seducing her, or the alcohol for affecting …
/r/MGTOW20/01/20 06:10 PM
5

Being bigger and heavier, and landing the first blow usually. Also the mentality that if you have to absolutely fight someone then your goal is to win, not to play marquess of queensberry fisticuffs, so you go straight for the eyes and the win and you don't hold back. Once you're able to escape, do so immediately.
/r/MGTOW20/01/20 02:54 PM
9

It was interesting in that it wasn't clear whether or not she took them up on the offer.
/r/MGTOW20/01/20 02:52 PM
6

Aren't they exploiting themselves in that case? Like if my blood is found to be worth a thousand dollars per 100ml because I was born with it, selling it is me exploiting my circumstances/myself. aka shaking what the Lord gave me I am not sure why that's the buyer's fault or why it would make the buyer the villain. Only if they're doing it out of sheer desperation, but even then, desperation still gives them a choice - like if I have to sell my car cheaper than I'd like because I desperately nee…
/r/MGTOW20/01/20 02:28 PM
7

Poor Corybn, the election result has turned him to drink but at least the pope seems keen
/r/MGTOW20/01/20 12:57 PM
12

Sprinting and lifting probably. Lifting so you get big enough that people won't fuck with you and sprinting so that if they do you can cheese it. There are no winners when you fight someone, even a weaker opponent can get in a good shot and hurt you before you beat them.
/r/MGTOW20/01/20 12:57 PM
2

Nah, you were banned because it automatically bans people that post in certain subreddits. You'll probably find you're banned from the related subreddits too automatically. It's intersectionality, and people need to learn what that means and call it out. (FTI it means finding one aspect of a person that puts them in a 'bad' group and using that to undermine their entire character, e.g. "Oh you're a white male, your opinion is invalid because you never suffer oppression" or "Oh you post in mgtow/…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen19/01/20 09:59 AM
4

Oh don't worry, having opinions, critical thinking and evidence based discussion don't hurt me. Do they hurt you?
/r/MGTOW18/01/20 11:04 AM
3

I wish I could find a clip of the Monroe Bot from the Red Dwarf episode The Last Day because that's what this reminded me of.
/r/MGTOW17/01/20 08:03 PM
3

Yes, I expect the full message here isn't "Why risk that? That's why I go to college and work hard to learn a trade." but is actually "Why risk that? I want marriage and alimony."
/r/MGTOW17/01/20 05:50 PM
2

If you're referring to beta guys, then in the eyes of women, they're the perfect men. They're obedient, helpful, generally safe to be around, offer resources for free, and protect them against other betas hitting on them. Also you know that famous scene (spoiler) at the end of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, women can just do that and these beta guys will immediately descend upon the enemy like angry bees. They don't want to fuck them, but they are the perfect men otherwise.
/r/MGTOW17/01/20 05:45 PM
7

I find that when women grow up without being put on a pedestal, they tend to become more well-rounded individuals. I know someone who spends her time engaging in a variety of hobbies, activities, volunteering etc and is a lovely, humorous, kind person who I'd absolutely date, if she wasn't fat and dog ugly. Unfortunately I never seem to meet thin attractive people who have hobbies and goals, and if I do they're generally dropped the second they start dating as if they're just passing the time. S…
/r/MGTOW15/01/20 11:37 PM
6

"Well, while we're choosing personal preference over qualifications, get one with big tits"
/r/MGTOW13/01/20 11:45 PM
4

Sounds like total nonsense, the horse girl phenomena isn't to do with horse girls controlling men, it's about how they prioritise their horse over others, and when they are in a relationship, their horse comes first. You see the same thing to a lesser extent with girls and other animals as well, like dogs and rabbits too. There's the old joke that you come third, horse first, daddy's money 2nd, you're third. Either way I have worked with horse girls and there was one at school, their entire focu…
/r/MGTOW12/01/20 09:12 PM
2

d'aww young bill burr is so cute
/r/MGTOW12/01/20 12:38 AM
2

Sometimes I hide my wife's insulin if she's misbehaving. /s
/r/MGTOW11/01/20 10:51 AM
8

I swear this makes it worse though. I had banter with a coworker and never reciprocated anything at all and they cornered me one day and made a bunch of sexual remarks out of nowhere. Immediate termination if roles were reversed I expect. I think I need to act a bit more blue pill to avoid it but it then betrays my character.
/r/MGTOW11/01/20 08:35 AM
4

Willingly putting themselves in danger, toxic bravado and machoism
/r/MGTOW09/01/20 10:50 PM
7

redpilled people don't use 'lol' and 'haha' and spam people with messages, guy's a complete beta and she's 100% correct
/r/MGTOW08/01/20 04:58 PM
1

It's nonsensical because it's based on the differences men and women spend doing 'household chores'. Looking into it, it's 311 vs 172 minutes per day for australia according to these statistics using australia because that's the link. These chores are defined as Time spent in unpaid work includes: routine housework; shopping; care for household members; child care; adult care; care for non-household members; volunteering; travel related to household activities; other unpaid activities Yet it's 1…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 10:15 AM
8

I think women 'dating down' is not good for either gender, it's basically dating a beta, they'll be unhappy and always looking to step up, even after marriage/kids, and the guy will always be unhappy because nothing he does will please her.
/r/MGTOW05/01/20 10:59 PM
3

While realistic, that expression is a bit disconcerting, can you imagine having sex with your girlfriend while the entire time she makes that face...
/r/MGTOW05/01/20 12:07 PM
2

I always wondered about raising a kid or two with a friend. You and your bro raising a kid each, but living together or nearby and sharing responsibilities.
/r/MGTOW29/12/19 06:57 PM
5

It absolutely is a shit test. She realises shit got real with a kid on the way and wants proof her man is strong enough to support her. Unfortunately he thinks supporting her means turning into a pussy whipped slave. Instead, he should be manning up, dictating how things will be, and telling her how it will be.
/r/MGTOW27/12/19 03:47 PM
9

OK, kill your father and get back to me
/r/MGTOW27/12/19 03:34 PM
1

So has FGM.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 02:40 PM
16

Not if cardi b is any indication
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 05:41 PM
13

50/50 whether that would actually stop her getting custody tbh
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 10:42 AM
0

Gotta agree there. It's much simpler than inventing some history. I think in general it's fairly obvious that humans are designed to bond with another person, because when you hit it off with someone of the opposite sex, you look forward to meeting that person again and spending time with them, you miss them, and you're hurt if they end the relationship even after a short period when it felt good. It is therefore obvious that if you see a person who freely and effortlessly jumps from one partner…
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 10:29 AM
25

Yeah it is, ban circumcision as a non-medically necessary procedure. BOOM. It really is that simple.
/r/MGTOW20/12/19 05:38 PM
35

Don't be that guy, obviously this is not talking about medically necessary procedures.
/r/MGTOW20/12/19 05:29 PM
8

As a single guy without kids, I also wash and cook
/r/MGTOW20/12/19 12:28 AM
24

Yeah, do these people forget that single men work 8 hours a day and still have to clean their houses and do the dishes etc lol
/r/MensRights13/12/19 02:08 PM
1

Well, I lived and worked in Japan for 4 years and I can tell you, that western style toilets are in the minority.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 04:17 PM
2

Nah, the vast majority of toilets in japan are like this
/r/MensRights23/11/19 02:04 PM
2

Best filthy hole in the ground I ever shit into
/r/MensRights23/11/19 11:55 AM
1

Yes, because she was drunk, probably.
/r/MGTOW20/11/19 01:29 PM
7

Because of the patriarchy /s But really tho this is what feminists say when disparaging men.
/r/MGTOW19/11/19 10:23 AM
34

It's even worse, making a film that attacks your customers (or their ideals) and then wondering why they don't go. C'mon ya rapist patriarchs come watch girls kicking your ass
/r/MGTOW19/11/19 12:16 AM
13

Just act annoyed and busy, if asked for help explain you're right in the middle of a critical problem but you'll spare 5 minutes. Appear like you're being more helpful than you should be considering this critical problem but then apologise and say maybe you can help later. So you look like you're trying your best to help, but are actually just fucking off to bum around doing whatever. It's a masterful art. Everyone thinks you're hard working. It's win win win.
/r/MGTOW19/11/19 12:10 AM
1

Ebay is amazing for clothes. I buy 2nd hand designer jeans for like £10 when new they're over 10 times that. £300 designer coat, £60 on ebay 2nd hand. £500 suit, £50 on ebay. All have been perfectly good condition and amazing quality. Same with Italian leather designer shoes. Pretty much anything really. People buy stuff and get fat and then sell it.
/r/MGTOW18/11/19 12:32 AM
12

Here comes the trickle truth
/r/MGTOW18/11/19 12:27 AM
3

Perhaps in the short term, but I think after 20 years you'll have made peace with it
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:25 PM
2

I think I put enough effort in in my last post, if it's unclear, I can't really help. I don't understand why you think that's a contradiction. Just cos you're not afraid of something, doesn't mean you want to do it.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 06:47 PM
2

That's a positive masculine trait, great. It literally isn't, did you not read what I said? It's the context that makes it positive or negative. That's literally what toxic masculinity is. Men are sometimes afraid of speaking up about their troubles because of the culture they live in. Nope, that is unfounded bollocks. Men aren't afraid of speaking up, instead there are broadly two things going on: Men don't want to broadcast their troubles. It's embedded in their DNA, and quite rightly so since…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 05:24 PM
1

You need to read No More Mr Nice Guy, it'll save your relationship
/r/MGTOW12/11/19 02:30 PM
4

As I said both. Things have positive. And negatives. The ability to remain stoic and in control under pressure can be positive, for example at work or in a crisis, or negative if the problem is so insurmountable alone that it causes harm. Not only do many men not want to share emotions but doing so makes them feel weak and ashamed, which can be just as harmful as keeping things private, if not more so.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 06:49 AM
8

There are no toxic aspects of masculinity, it's like accusing an apple of being chaotic evil, if it's big ripe juicy and heavy and it falls on your head it's toxic, but if it's big ripe juicy and heavy and you find it when you're hungry, it's not toxic. Being big ripe jucy and heavy is not a toxic apple trait, it's purely the circumstances in which its attributes are deployed. Likewise a man who is aggressive might be negative if he's in a dangerous situation in which running away would be safer…
/r/MensRights11/11/19 11:10 PM
3

Briffault's Law The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. — Robert Briffault, The Mothers, Vol. I, p. 191 Expanded: A woman may very well have received past benefits from her relationship with a man, but this does not guarantee her continuing the relationship with him. Even when a woman promises to continue the relationship with a man in the future in exchan…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:17 PM
1

Well, that's something at least. I suppose it doesn't help with the votes if you don't make it sound like it's all about helping women though.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:09 PM
1

Surely encouraging people to stay out of work for longer is going to make the "problem" of the gender pay gap worse. I don't know what effect this would have on fathers either, I guess they pick up the monetary slack?
/r/MensRights08/11/19 08:05 AM
11

I could get a separate bed... but nah, I won't have anything to whinge and feel oppressed about
/r/MensRights03/11/19 10:04 AM
28

"If the evidence was good enough to overturn my conviction, why isn't it good enough to reward me compensation?" I'd like to know this too
/r/MensRights03/11/19 10:02 AM
4

When sex robots reach the level of stereotypical dumb blonde girl, probably.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen29/10/19 11:19 PM
28

Men don't prioritise women's desires at all, satisfying your woman in bed is considered to be the man's job, and it's something guys spend a lot of time and energy both worrying about and trying to achieve.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen28/10/19 10:19 AM
1

I'm all for the circle jerk but it wasn't all women. Snopes debunked it.
/r/MGTOW24/10/19 09:57 PM
16

Comments are double the retweets, usually, but it basically means you dun goofed
/r/MensRights24/10/19 03:50 PM
2

I'm fairly certain that I agree with you
/r/TheRedPill22/10/19 06:43 PM
1

There's not enough feelings in that, I don't think it was written by a woman. It's either amazing trollbait or it's simply written by an incel
/r/MGTOW22/10/19 04:21 PM
22

"If I knew I was paying I'd have picked a better class of hooker"
/r/MGTOW22/10/19 04:13 PM
1

It's weird isn't it. The other day I was talking to some guys at a party, one guy was thinking about getting an electric car, and we ended up discussing the future of clean energy, and we had some different viewpoints and it was quite an enjoyable discussion. In the same room, some girls were talking about another girl (not present) relationship with her husband and what they thought about if they were compatible, then started talking about some annoying woman at work that they have to put up wi…
/r/MGTOW20/10/19 04:39 PM
7

Paternity test probably not a bad idea either
/r/MensRights13/10/19 11:14 AM
1

Jesus that's in my city and I didn't hear anything about it
/r/MGTOW11/10/19 08:31 PM
2

I'VE NEVA MET A GUD 'UMIE
/r/MensRights09/10/19 03:52 PM
2

Ask the museum why it pays its women less than men
/r/MensRights05/10/19 09:48 AM
9

This is retarded If I ask to cut my child's hand off that's not good but if he has hand-aids and will 100% die without cutting it off then of course the doctors will recommend it, that is a stupid argument to say they recommend it when there are more benefits than detriments because of course they would. But in almost no cases is that actually true. I'm sure it's easier to give an infant a tattoo of a shark on his forehead than an adult as well but that doesn't give any kind of justification wha…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 09:47 AM
19

Surprised there isn't a blue tick
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:49 AM
2

But if one spouse has put their career on hold or left it entirely in order to be a full time caregiver, then alimony should be paid But someone has put being a parent to their child on hold in order to go to work and earn money. For true equality, the caregiver would go and get a job for x years while the provider gets to slack off their job and become a caregiver. I never understood why people ONLY value earning potential and don't assign any value to not working and raising a child, like that…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/10/19 12:07 AM
1

Unlike the other responses I can tell you it's likely a case of men having no frame. I have a friend in her 40s who will fuck anyone that is vaguely alpha. She shows me her tinder, man initiates convo, often a really good looking man, she initiates banter (playful shit test), man fails it miserably. She's good looking for her age, too. Brazilian genetics I guess. I took over her tinder in the pub cos she was complaining, so she had a message from a guy, and I messaged him back saying 'I'm lookin…
/r/MGTOW28/09/19 07:55 PM
2

Trickle truth
/r/MGTOW26/09/19 02:47 PM
6

I will never, ever, understand the idea that being a stay-at-home parent is somehow a punishment or a bad thing. I would love nothing more than to never have to work another day in my life while raising a kid and having a partner fund everything. The fact people think it's brave to 'sacrifice' your career in such a way and that you should have reperations if you do so and later divorce is ludicrous. If you wanted to make divorce fair then they would swap roles and the breadwinner would be able t…
/r/MensRights22/09/19 09:14 AM
3

Thanks for the sanity. I don't understand the outrage or people saying it might be illegal. Many buildings I've worked in have alternate gender bathrooms on each floor, so 1/3/5/7 is male and 2/4/6/8 is female. Placed I used to work men had to go up a floor to use the bathroom. Other place I worked it was on the same floor. Not a massive deal. If it was a mixed gender restroom and they just made it for women-only I can see that being a bit of a dick move.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 09:10 AM
1

You can have a joint account as well, just get paid into your own and agree how much to transfer into the joint per month. Protip, enough to cover your half of the bills
/r/MGTOW17/09/19 09:17 AM
2

Unless you're looking at grade, it's hard to tell if the person was accomplished at the subject or not. I'm referring to pre-interview screening as well. I mean, if you knew that they needed a score of 50 to get their qualification, and they only got 40, but were allowed in because they were a woman, that's gonna really raise flags. Lowering the entrance criteria attracts people that are less skilled and less interested, it stands to reason that the output is going to be worse as well.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:51 PM
3

So when a woman applies for a job how do I know they are good at it and didn't just get their degree because bobs and vagine? Not worth the risk, hire a man instead.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:09 PM
12

I thought musk got out?
/r/MGTOW07/09/19 01:50 AM
53

In comic form...
/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/09/19 07:00 PM
2

Imagine you play a board game like monopoly every week, and you're sorta OK at it but not great. Then someone tells you you've been playing it wrong. He tells you the new rules but now you lose every game. You're angry because you were comfortable before and these new rules are stupid, you're not winning and the game is not as fun. That's your situation. The only way out of it is to accept the new rules and learn how to play the game with them. It takes time but you'll get the hang of it eventua…
/r/MGTOW04/09/19 10:28 AM
46

The article does state: most men are perfectly aware of the difference between a friendly hug and a creepy hug. Yet I'd guess if you gave a friendly hug and later on someone told the person you hugged that you were 'a bit creepy', then she'd perhaps look back and the friendly hug would suddenly turn into a creepy hug, after the fact, and good ammo for HR.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen29/08/19 06:10 PM
133

From the article: So there you go: most men are perfectly aware of the difference between a friendly hug and a creepy hug. They are perfectly aware of what constitutes harassment and what doesn’t. Which makes you wonder why so many men are afraid to interact with women at work? The answer to that question, perhaps, is that a lot of men aren’t so much afraid of being accused of anything as they are they are angry that #MeToo ever happened. They’re angry that they’ve been made to think about their…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen29/08/19 04:26 PM
2

It's basically the ultimate beta move. It gets a cheap laugh but it's a massive turn-off. There's no faster way to get into the friendzone. If you say the exact opposite you'll be surprised how effective it is. Simply state that you're amazing. Instead of saying me_irl lol forever alone just like me amirite looool, just say I'm never alone because I have like 20 girlfriends, and shrug. You don't need any kind of charm to pull it off, it sounds like total crap because it is but you'll get girls s…
/r/MGTOW27/08/19 02:19 PM
11

You could probably condense some of the info into just a couple of rules and it'd improve a young boy's life immensely. I wish someone had told me never to use self-deprecating humour.
/r/MGTOW26/08/19 02:04 PM
2

It lowers the bar for being interested. Like I enjoy fishing but I won't go to a lecture on fishing. But if there's a free buffet and open bar... I might. So you end up with less enthusiastic people going for the wrong reasons.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 04:49 PM
3

If you artificalially help a group not based on merit but based on their gender then it makes people lose respect for that gender because you cannot tell if a person is doing stem because they are genuinely good and passionate about it or because they were simply chosen due to their biology. We had a girl join our company during a gap year that despite scoring 35% (the absolute minimum to pass) on her comp Sci degree so far she was the highest scoring girl and got a super exclusive sponsored gir…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:12 AM
7

List all the options men have to deal with unwanted pregnancy when the mother has made up her mind... Now list all the options women have when the man has made up his mind...
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/08/19 10:16 PM
-20

Yep I'm getting tired of seeing it
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:53 PM
11

Considering the contentious topic and the fact that people posting here are oppressed and disillusioned it's amazing how this sub is so wholesome compared to MGTOW, braincels etc.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 11:42 AM
1

legit never happens Look at the case of DuPont heir https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_and_sentencing_of_Robert_H._Richards_IV Raped his own toddler daughter, judge said he wouldn't fare well in jail, so his 8 year sentence was suspended. Superior Court Judge Jan R. Jurden still a practicing judge.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:56 AM
34

Dog reads it
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:53 AM
12

I hear your mom's going out with... Squeak!
/r/MensRights19/08/19 10:25 PM
1

He should have done that as it cost him hundreds of thousands in legal fees.
/r/MGTOW17/08/19 04:45 PM
4

Boom, roasted
/r/MensRights12/08/19 05:36 PM
1

:3
/r/MensRights12/08/19 12:01 PM
22

I thought this was an interesting title, it would seem that you're allowed to call her a rapist because the victim was a girl.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:24 AM
2

Absolutely. Check you don't live somewhere with common law marriage either.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 12:05 PM
2

As long as you don't live in the UK, cos the DWP will find you fit and able bodied
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:43 PM
11

Communism a theory or system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs. Feminism the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes. The reality of both is nothing at all like the definition.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 01:43 PM
21

No True Scotsman Feminist Real feminism is however feminism manifests itself, not some ideology. You could say what you've said about communism. Thank you for sticking up for real communism. I hate it when people think that shit we read about that killed 10s of millions of people is normal communism. True communism is equality for all. It benefits everyone.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 01:09 PM
4

Haha, I never actually thought of that.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 12:51 PM
-3

Waste of time. Here's the response from the last one: All non-consensual sexual penetration is dealt with by specific serious offences, including those that can be committed by a man or a woman. For example, the offence of assault by penetration carries the same maximum penalty as rape. The sentences available under the Act for all sexual offences are significant and reflect the seriousness of the offending. Issues surrounding the definition of rape were considered both in the “Setting the Bound…
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:11 AM
21

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTx4LLHxMyM
/r/MensRights25/07/19 10:49 PM
2

In another case, the Crown Prosecution Service demanded to search the phone of a 12-year-old rape victim - even though the perpetrator had admitted the crime. Makes it sound like that's all you need, admitting a crime. People don't seem to understand that half of going to court is proving that you are treated fairly. In court they might just say 'our client was confused, he feels guilty but he didn't actually do anything wrong', or 'he feels he committed the crime because she is so upset but tec…
/r/MensRights25/07/19 08:12 AM
1

As per a petition to the UK government All non-consensual sexual penetration is dealt with by specific serious offences, including those that can be committed by a man or a woman. For example, the offence of assault by penetration carries the same maximum penalty as rape. The sentences available under the Act for all sexual offences are significant and reflect the seriousness of the offending. Issues surrounding the definition of rape were considered both in the “Setting the Boundaries” consulta…
/r/MensRights25/07/19 08:05 AM
9

Being charged means they've decided to move forward with prosecution and you will appear in court. Convicted means you were found guilty of a crime, after which sentencing will occur to decide your punishment, usually at the same time. I agree with you. I think the petition could have been worded better. But even anonymity until being charged would be a step forward.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:48 PM
1

The Riker. Total power move.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 10:09 PM
1

Was it a participation award
/r/MensRights17/07/19 10:08 PM
7

I played a game of squash against a mate the other day and I lost every single point except for two, both of which were him cocking up the serve. I'm pretty sure I could win a point just by standing there.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 12:10 PM
3

Thanks for the links, good to hear the feminist propaganda machine that is the BBC is starting to face repercussions
/r/MensRights01/07/19 09:49 PM
2

How many weekends of house arrest is that then
/r/MensRights15/06/19 10:49 PM
11

The rest of this series is found here
/r/MensRights15/06/19 08:22 AM
2

Men will do anything, we have an innate sense of duty. We'll charge out of trenches directly towards machine gun encampments, we'll take harsh jobs mining coal, whatever needs doing one of us will do it.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 07:59 PM
3

That sounds pretty gay
/r/MensRights08/06/19 06:09 PM
5

Most likely he goes both ways
/r/MensRights08/06/19 07:53 AM
3

If only, instead the poster is trying to end the stigma by making men go and get support. That's not how stigma works, if there's stigma around something you don't dispel it by making people do the stigmatised thing. If you want to fix stigma you need to target the general public and educate them on why it's wrong to look down on these victims.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:15 PM
0

I think the majority of the rest of the time you're left on your own, and what care you do receive is mostly unskilled and could be replaced by anybody with common sense. You could elevate the nurses to a higher position where they delegate, and have peons do much of the grunt work. If someone complains they need a glass of water or help going to the toilet, anybody can do that.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:07 PM
58

I reckon the solution is to provided anonymous support services, because I can see opening up doing more harm than good if anyone catches wind of it.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 05:16 PM
6

I don't know, I think the show pushes women's rights more than anything on TV, it made the most powerful people women - cersei was the most powerful in the entire show, followed by dany, and then sansa who survived horrible ordeals to become strong, and supported by other strong female characters - brienne being arguably the strongest knight, catelin stark being the strongest stark, arya being the strong and independent black sheep. But somehow they find a way to shit on the patriarchy anyway
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:57 PM
22

My two observations: "We are not doing this to make people stop watching, but to make them aware of the fact that it's an unfair representation of the world", she says. What is a "fair representation" of the world? And considering this is not set in our world, or time period, why should it match? And also, why not have an article "Game of Thrones: How often do men get killed in the show?". I'd be interested to see if it's a "fair representation".
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:37 PM
8

I wonder what her motivation was
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:54 PM
1

A huge number of words in the dictionary have 'typical' in them to describe their common use cases. Here's a couple of examples: Concentration Camp - a place where large numbers of people (such as prisoners of war, political prisoners, refugees, or the members of an ethnic or religious minority) are detained or confined under armed guard —used especially in reference to camps created by the Nazis in World War II for the internment and persecution of Jews and other prisoners friend zone - a frien…
/r/MensRights03/05/19 08:06 AM
2

I replied above but if that's how people were to use the word, then that's how the dictionary defines it. No use getting salty about the dictionary for reporting what it sees. When a person says 'robbery' (or 'I was robbed') does the majority of the population automatically think 'black person'? The answer is no. But when someone says 'there was a rape', the population will automatically assume male>female. So that's why it is defined as such.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 09:04 AM
3

The dictionary definition is referring to usage of the word, which is obviously typically used to discuss M on F, even if it's not true.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 09:02 AM
17

He's fallen into the eternal trap of personal responsibility vs. criminal responsibility, and he's made a hash of explaining it. You have a responsibility to yourself to take care of yourself and avoid risky situations without being prepared to accept those risks. If you read his other comments that's what he's trying to say. People seem to think in black and white though, that by saying the woman has some responsibility to take care of herself and shoulder the consequences of any actions that a…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:48 PM
22

You know we still will though cos of our toxic masculinity. I just can't help but try to be protective of other people, so toxic right now
/r/MensRights27/04/19 08:34 PM
18

Probably because the sub is spammed with this opinion over and over
/r/MensRights17/04/19 10:58 PM
1

This is a recent occurrence. One of the reasons for this is because it generally hits old men. The incidence of prostate cancer is increasing because a significant number of men died in world war 2, preventing them reaching old age and thus skewing the statistics. Rather than prostate cancer going up, it's mostly been level, but thanks to advance screening for breast cancer, it's actually breast cancer that has decreased quite a bit. It's good that screening of prostate cancer is being encourage…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 11:23 AM
26

https://leamingtonobserver.co.uk/news/drunken-woman-had-to-be-dragged-from-burning-car-after-hitting-three-other-vehicles-on-a46-12419/
/r/MensRights12/04/19 12:05 PM
19

Not true, it would seem she came up with how to solve the problem and other people implemented it. Like if I designed a machine for turning seawater into gold, and a bunch of people took my designs and built it, who should get the credit?
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:54 PM
4

Wrong sub
/r/MensRights10/04/19 03:13 PM
6

Wrong sub
/r/MensRights10/04/19 03:08 PM
4

If you argued that then the opposing side would say that by the letter of the law no rape occurred, as per the comment above that says rape is only male on female, therefore this law does not remove the parental rights. I get what you're saying but this wouldn't work both ways
/r/MensRights07/04/19 07:16 PM
20

Just like a floppy labia, that's why I'm getting my daughter trimmed /s
/r/MensRights05/04/19 05:49 PM
2

I'd go but I'm at work
/r/MensRights03/04/19 10:51 AM
2

Nevertheless, Turner added that execs are "more willing to listen to people saying, 'I want the same amount of money.' So things are getting done, but it will take a while, I think..." This states that she views equality of pay as being progress, even though she says it's already fair. Can't be both
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:15 PM
3

https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/world-war-one/the-western-front-in-world-war-one/world-war-one-executions/
/r/MensRights31/03/19 02:09 PM
1

Probably because they tend to be more open about it
/r/MensRights31/03/19 02:06 PM
4

The little girls enjoy it too. Yet we instantly recognise that as being fucked up. Both boys and girls will look back on it later and recognise that they were taken advantage of and it was horrific abuse, but at the time, they both enjoy it. There are always pages of text messages between the teacher and the student about how much they love each other.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:53 PM
4

Someone posted something like this a while back about how your average young man that wasn't a farmer would have to become apprenticed into a field, basically think unpaid intern doing hard manual labour for 16 hours a day, for many years, eventually rising up and becoming a master after 15-20 years of hard graft at which point they could try to marry and continue their profession with slightly less than 16 hours a day's hard work, taking on their own apprentice. By comparison the women would le…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 12:07 AM
16

BBC with the classic double whammy, by reporting what is vaguely 'reported' it doesn't need to fact check or be remotely accurate. It then adds a bit of sensationalism by emphasizing this is worse than you thought because women and children might have been predominant amongst the victims. And in humanity bingo women and children are worth 5 points while men are only worth one.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:02 PM
8

Feminism is for men too, so pretend this is true and go into it from that perspective, talking about how it helps male issues and what those issues are. Never give any specific example of it helping, just say it does. Not that you could find one anyway... But feminists are always saying it does so it must do.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 12:13 PM
2

Sorry about that
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:57 AM
1

I'm sorry you feel that way
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:56 AM
1

Did you hire her? The last several companies I've worked at we had similar (although smaller companies, we tend to just get applications one after the other in a trickle). Whenever a female CV comes in they try really hard to hire her. In three cases, they did hire her just because she was female. All three had to be let go when it turned out they were not competent. Then one time I worked at a company with a girl who graduated university, and I had the same sceptical stance when I spoke to her,…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:49 PM
13

I like you :3
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:30 PM
2

It's not really though is it, it's like throwing a huge festival to celebrate one thing and when the other thing asks when its festival is, saying 'oh yeah, its like, 19th november, so shut up you have your festival too'. 19th november runs around and literally nothing happens
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:01 AM
1

Hah those fools, if they just removed the physical test they could get even more! Also if they gave free scholarships and training to women and a free grant then they'd get even MORE. It's like they're not even trying. I blame the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 12:17 AM
6

Maybe they should try a bit harder
/r/MensRights03/03/19 11:02 PM
1

I can't even understand what this is trying to show me. The tagline 'Every Hero Sweats' doesn't make any sense with the video. A tagline starting with 'Every' should have a bunch of examples right? Like all different types of people and how they are unified by this one quality. Him randomly getting a job doesn't make any sense, on its own or in the context of the tagline. Did he leave the army? But it keeps showing them side by side, and there's nothing to indicate the passage of time. He's the …
/r/MensRights02/03/19 06:18 PM
30

“This is all about equitable treatment,” he added. In his ruling, Judge Gray wrote that women “could conceivably be better suited physically for some of today’s combat positions than the average man” Hahaha wut. Sounds equitable. Also sounds like if women are drafted they'll end up with the cushy safe jobs. Hurrah for equality.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 10:02 PM
35

I'd say there's something wrong with the way we raise boys and treat men in general that leads to the creation of this kind of person, that doesn't understand not pushing back is the worst thing you can do.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 09:54 PM
1

I can't see why that's a problem in this instance.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 06:27 PM
0

She both acknowledges it's a horrible thing and feels guilty enough to talk about it because she's obviously conflicted about how she feels vs how she thinks she should feel. I think she's totally fine, I can't see how she's done anything wrong. The girls I'd be concerned about are those that don't think it's a horrible thing, and that don't feel guilty whatsoever about losing attraction.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:09 PM
12

Man like girl with red hair. One day man find out girl wearing wig, born without any hair. Man lose attraction to girl with no hair. Man try to rationalise that with wig, it's the same. But man know deep down that is not same. Man know some people not care. But this man cannot help himself from caring. Born that way. Man cannot control his attraction. Man feel guilty about this, post on internet. People tell man he is piece of shit. Man cannot change his attraction. Man still feel sorry for girl…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:22 PM
0

Naw, that isn't the case at all. She's soliciting advice just indirectly. And she's not making some logical decision like you portray, she's saying something happened and I don't feel attracted anymore, is this normal? She's not trying to rationalise anything, or justify herself, it's just a plain and simple question. And the answer is that you can't control how your romantic feelings work. Believe me, I know. I've been in situations where I really like my partner and she's textbook perfect but …
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:04 AM
1

It's just a post online asking for advice, pretty sure that would be anyone's first move. I don't think people expect to have to justify themselves when making a post asking basically for advice. Like, if I wanted to post about my SO cheating on me I wouldn't feel the need to justify why I don't deserve it.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 10:52 PM
-6

How shallow her attraction is is completely irrelevant, it's not something she or anyone can control. She can be attracted to all kinds of people, just like we all can, but if the reason for our attraction is removed, we will not stay attracted. She displays no callousness whatsoever towards a victim of rape. She both understands that it's a horrible thing and feels guilty for it affecting her attraction. You say nobody is saying she must be attracted, but then you say if she's not, because some…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 02:06 PM
-2

Eh, I should have known an analogy so complex wouldn't work. Man like girl with red hair. One day man find out girl wearing wig, born without any hair. Man lose attraction to girl with no hair. Man try to rationalise that with wig, it's the same. But man know deep down that is not same. Man know some people not care. But this man cannot help himself from caring. Born that way. Man cannot control his attraction. Man feel guilty about this, post on internet. People tell man he is piece of shit. Ma…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:48 PM
-3

Such a horrible thing to say, and wildly incorrect. You need to appreciate that if you're attracted to someone because they're strong and confident and untouchable, that ANYTHING that shatters that vision will stop the attraction. Like if you're attracted to a girl and then you find out she's actually a massive drug abuser, or she was frequently involved in massive sex orgies with multiple guys, or she's a massive racist - your attraction will probably just vanish. The fact that the reason it va…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:11 PM
1

Why is she shallow and trashy? She hasn't said anything about not caring, she is simply talking about her romantic feelings.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 11:50 AM
1

You misread what he put and then jumped on it. He didn't say "It wasn't rape", he said "It wasn't the rape [that affected her]". It was the fact he had become weak and shattered her view of him. How her view was shattered doesn't change the fact that it was.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 10:51 AM
1

Which bit didn't you understand? She believed him to be completely infallible. Nothing but strength and stability. She was attracted to him for that reason. Take them away, and the attraction disappears. Doesn't matter what reason they disappear, attraction is attraction and it will vanish. In this case I feel bad for the guy, as I'm sure she does too, but suggesting you have to continue to be attracted because the situation is unfair to the guy, is absolutely ridiculous. It reeks of entitlement…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 10:36 AM
1

I'm actually amazed at all the replies telling her she's a piece of shit. It doesn't have anything to do with her empathy for him, she just feels that her attraction to him is based on an image that he's strong and infallible. This image has been irrevocably destroyed, so her attraction is gone. She can't control how she feels attraction, none of us can. Imagine if your partner cheated on you, in the past. That might tear you up and cause you to lose attraction. The same kind of feeling would hi…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 10:30 AM
1

Source: Living in the real world Try googling 'what is sexism' and look how many results are about women. Are you surprised that the dictionary says ya, sexism is usually referring to women. Dictionaries tell you how words are used, which is why they have silly words in that people invent if they become popular enough, like mansplaining. Let me guess, you think the dictionary having a definition for that is sexist too? Evil dictionary, explaining what words mean that people use! I'm interested i…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 08:28 PM
2

They're both objective. Find 1,000 people and ask them to name something that's sexism. The vast majority will name something that is discrimination against women. Because most people associate sexism with women, the dictionary has stated that when the word is used, it's typically being used with regards to women. I can't believe people would screech about a dictionary definition that explains how a word is used. The fact that people neglect to acknowledge sexism happens to both men and women eq…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 08:10 PM
-3

The dictionary is completely objective, it is describing how the word is used, and it's saying it's mostly used to refer to women, which is true. This kind of post makes me feel embarassed when others come to the sub and read it, it doesn't shine a positive light on the movement.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:56 PM
1

If it were true she'd have a linkedin page absolutely plastered with all of this information and she'd be praised as the messiah, interviewed and reblogged by everyone.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:31 PM
22

Bit different bringing it through an airport but this sentence: They were shocked to find they were facing mandatory prison sentences under legislation aimed at deterrence Suggests that perhaps it was 16 months because it was mandatory for possessing an illegal weapon.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 05:57 PM
1

Dunno, this sentence actually seems alright.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 04:11 PM
2

I was surprised by this too. I wonder why it was so high compared to other crimes that have a small suspended sentence.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 04:10 PM
2

Much of it is because salary is a negotiation, and it can create animosity to know that your coworker is being paid more than you. If a company has an employee already and then desperately needs another one, they might have to offer more money to incentivise someone to work there when they have multiple offers from different companies. If you're already working there and the company hires another copy of yourself on +$10,000 more, you'd be pretty pissed off if you found out. Likewise if you were…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/19 11:11 AM
7

I can believe it, I know almost nothing about Australia but everytime I see a news article about the country it's always about some men getting fucked over
/r/MensRights04/02/19 12:45 PM
3

I'm not talking anecdotally though, look at the figures for how many people quit/would quit if they didn't have to work anymore. I myself have risen to the top of my career and when I work I am paid a silly amount, but if I didn't have to work I would quit in an instant. I actually wish I had enough money to foster a child and raise them myself.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 02:54 PM
5

You can't give him back those hours lost somehow. You can adjust for it in the remuneration granted through the divorce though. They consciously made that choice when they married and decided to live abroad so that my dad could pursue his career If they made that contract then she wouldn't be entitled to anything in a separation, because she knew what she was signing up for at the time too. "Pursuing a career" is such a cop out. What it means is working 40 hours a week in a job you probably disl…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 10:38 AM
8

Problem is, you're only thinking in terms of money. For it to be truly fair, she would have to work for 18 years while he raised the kids. Then they'd be equal. Obviously that's impossible unless they had more kids. I think most guys would love to have a life raising kids funded by their partner. It just rarely makes financial sense since men tend to earn more. It always baffles me how it's only the money people focus on. If your partner does nothing but lounge around all day, for years, perhaps…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 09:47 AM
2

I don't think you were wrong, just put it there if anyone was curious how they defined it
/r/MensRights29/01/19 02:29 PM
3

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/2/section/33/enacted It is an offence for a person to disclose a private sexual photograph or film if the disclosure is made— (a)without the consent of an individual who appears in the photograph or film, and (b)with the intention of causing that individual distress. A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine (or both), and (b)on summary conviction,…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 01:29 PM
3

The point is, nobody does. We all know it's wrong. And you're a shitty person if you do it. Plus, it's a criminal offense. So, no problem. Except they're not saying "Don't share nudes of others, it's a criminal offense". They're saying, if you discuss in private aspects of your personal life involving other people, which isn't a crime, you are contributing to this thing called 'rape culture' which is another word for the normalisation of rape. This is quite clearly false. Private discussion does…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 10:52 AM
3

I like how it implies it's a precursor to crime. Shooting people in video games? Headshotting male soldiers? What's next, real life murder and rape? No, actually. No.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 10:11 AM
2

Why is that irrelevant? She is literally a poster-child for gender equality in tech. I didn't say it's because she posts on instagram, I said it's because she has posted a considerable amount of her life onto instagram but hasn't posted anything tech related other than the one picture. I said I wonder if she has a github account, or some other outlet for the tech side of her life, but as you've demonstrated, there doesn't appear to be one. I didn't insinuate she didn't write code, I outright sai…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 09:52 PM
1

15 contributions in the last year? All I'm saying is that if you want to be someone who is a representative of people in tech, you should at least be a role model for people in tech. I have worked with people like her before many MANY times in my career and the ones that are passionate about computer science are actively involved in it and it's a big part of their life. It just has to be, you can't be a software engineer without having a huge passion for it, it's somewhat unique in that regard. …
/r/MensRights28/01/19 09:37 PM
1

Did you look at the contributions page Because it might be eye opening
/r/MensRights28/01/19 09:29 PM
10

Would probably fall foul of the same 'suggestion' that the women only swedish festival had though, which was also declared discriminatory.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 10:46 AM
6

Maybe the female CS students that were actually into CS weren't pretty enough
/r/MensRights27/01/19 05:45 PM
5

The best part of that sub is how people ask questions there, and there are some fascinating answers that have no basis in reality. I especially like the ones that explain men's rationale, it's like if a 10 year old male teenager were to try and a describe the intricacies of pregnancy and what to expect.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 03:10 PM
30

Interesting, she's an instragram model who posts lots of pictures of herself doing yoga etc. but hasn't actually posted anything technology related at all. I wonder if she has a github account. Maybe pick someone like this (first google result) to represent women in tech instead next time.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:26 PM
25

It's just a little bit too easy to assume that certain loud people on the internet are in the minority.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 05:09 AM
3

Thanks for being a voice of reason. Likewise if you're hammered and I say here you go mate, drive home in my car, and give you keys to my car and you crash and die, I would hope that I'd be held criminally responsible too.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:13 PM
16

The biggest consequence is not boycotting but the fact that men will not want to work at the company, or will work there for experience and jump ship to a competitor that doesn't treat them like trash
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:47 PM
1

The point is the original advert took a shit on men, saying they are shit and useless, and this video highlights that men are already being shit on by society. They'd have done better in the video to include more accomplishments of men though.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:31 PM
35

One of Karen Straughan's videos ended with a compilation of men doing things, and I wish I could find it. I looked through tons of videos but couldn't find that particular one.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:30 PM
14

I think it'd make more sense as 'women' rather than 'a woman', just to get across that we are talking about all women having these toxic behaviours, to be a counterpoint for how all men are portrayed as having the toxic behaviours in the video.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:13 PM
3

exists mfw harmful
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:31 PM
11

Effort would be better spent researching how to get people to give a shit
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:05 PM
1

Well it all stems from the very sexist idea that men need more calories per day than women, and the sexist notion that men are bigger and stronger.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 01:07 PM
6

Brave FTFY
/r/MensRights06/01/19 09:46 AM
2

So disrespectul
/r/MensRights03/01/19 05:51 PM
0

Okay, well, since you can't give a straight answer in like 10 posts I'll leave you to your delusions
/r/MensRights01/01/19 06:06 PM
0

Try what again, I answered your question, I just guessed the amount, 27,397 according to the post above. Again, what conclusion is it you're trying to derive from this whole thing? Are you capable of giving a straight answer or are you going to continue to prattle off topic. I feel like I'm entertaining someone with mental illness.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 06:01 PM
1

Well, he'd hypothetically earn 22k or whatever the figure was, for a single day. She earned 150k for a single day. The tweet shows her defending her fee by saying another person earned $10mil in a year. $10mil in one year is much more than what she is likely to earn when the biggest day of the year earns her only $150k. I'm not sure what conclusion we're searching for here, he earns considerably more. Which is what I said.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 05:15 PM
0

It's unlikely he's paid daily, he probably gets 10mil/12 a month. So, if you look at a single day, zero. He gets zero, in his bank account. Unless it's payday. In which case he gets just under 1 mil. Since he doesn't earn 365 million a year, or zero, it's a pointless question to ask.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 05:01 PM
1

In mathematical theory, perhaps, but we're talking about applied mathematics. Considering you haven't offered any insight whatsoever into why I am wrong, which you claim is quite easy to do, and don't seem to understand what we're talking about (although you did think it was a 'word problem' before), I am gonna have to decline your offer on the basis of your lack of credibility.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 04:48 PM
1

I just assumed that at $30/hr I could multiply by the number of hours in a year to compare how much you make with people that have a fixed salary. So if someone had a salary of only $200k then you'd be out earning them. So well done you! And you could tell me that it doesn't work that way but then that's what I wrote in my original post that has garnered so much criticism, so I already know. If you had something constructive to say I would have assumed you'd just have said it instead of dancing …
/r/MensRights01/01/19 04:38 PM
0

You don't need to waste your time on me when you're making $262,800/year with your tutoring
/r/MensRights01/01/19 04:34 PM
0

Certain thanks mate, I know that $10mil is greater than what she will earn when the biggest event of the year earns her only $150k
/r/MensRights01/01/19 04:30 PM
0

Nope, but thanks for the offer.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 04:25 PM
-2

That's okay, we can't all understand everything we read. Happy new year to you too!
/r/MensRights01/01/19 03:34 PM
-1

Sorry
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:37 PM
-4

I'm sorry you feel the need to belittle others and I hope that you can one day grow as a person.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:25 PM
-4

No. And it's not a gendered issue. I just wanted to point out the faulty salary comparison.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:19 PM
-6

But NYE is one of the biggest events of the year and is likely going to be the most highly paid. What would she do during January/February/March that's going to pay anywhere near that much? Honestly, the lack of logical thinking here is rather alarming. It's no different than saying "She didn't get paid anything on December 28th so 365 x 0 is 0 so her annual income is 0." It really is that stupid.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:40 PM
-7

Can you explain how she's going to do 67 new years eve events in a single year?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:45 PM
-18

There's a comment above with 60+ upvotes saying technically she worked half a day and doing some maths to conclude she'd be paid $110 million a year. Which is ridiculous, if you're not paid a salary then you can't simply multiply those numbers to compare it. Unless there is an event 365 days a year that she does for the same amount of money and she never misses a single day, which is obviously not going to happen. And to assume it's half a day, well she'd have to do 2 per day. I think it's safe …
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:29 PM
-30

That's what the person I am replying to did, they divided salary into a daily amount. Which isn't a fair comparison.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:44 AM
-39

Presumably she doesn't work every single day though whereas he's paid a salary for his entire year including days he doesn't work. So he earns much more
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:00 AM
11

Seemed straightforward, he tripped her up by asking her what women are superior at, which fed into her narrative that women are strong and brave and superior to men, then turned it around and it broke her mind because she'd never considered men as superior before at anything, they were always the faceless enemy. He used the example of physical strength as a way to force her logic and reasoning to fight with her indoctrination because it is not disputable that men are physically stronger than wom…
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:15 PM
3

That page is cancer on mobile
/r/MensRights27/12/18 12:56 PM
2

I think it isn't that they have sexual power, but instead men are not educated correctly on relationship dynamics. They are taught incorrectly to be supplicant and that is used against them by women.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 05:29 PM
1

It sucked in series 3 tho, the first season was best
/r/MensRights25/12/18 04:33 PM
2

Female genital mutilation
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:15 PM
7

bbc is basically feminist news at this point, I got banned from /r/uk for saying it. I highlighted how the front page on any day, other than the main headlines, is mostly pro-women or womens problems pieces.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:05 PM
111

"Makes whinging about people telling you not to breastfeed in public seem very pathetic in comparison doesn't it" then get your popcorn
/r/MensRights14/12/18 10:27 PM
-6

Complete set https://web.elastic.org/~fche/mirrors/antifemcomics/index.html
/r/MensRights09/12/18 12:06 PM
1

Doesn't matter who left who, every possibility she thought the grass was greener on the other side and has quickly learned that she fucked up big time, and wants to drag you down with her so she doesn't have to put up with you getting on with your life and being successful. I wouldn't apologise for anything, it just fuels that kind of person. You need to cut her out as completely as you can, and you should record your interactions with her in case she flips and decides to file a false claim to h…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:28 PM
2

Yeah, she didn't get over it all. She has a huge void in her life created by your absence, and she's probably banging guy after guy trying to get that connection back. I have a friend in that situation, her entire life is dedicated to banging guys off tinder and posting tons of group messages / facebook statuses trying to make it look like she's having the time of her life. After a few drinks she breaks down and talks about how miserable she is. She can't find a guy that she likes because she ke…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:30 PM
4

If you're in the habit of bringing girls back to your place perhaps a security camera out front would be useful, especially if you pause outside to make out for a bit.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:27 PM
1

They just need to moderate those kinds of posts out. All the subs went that direction after incels got banned
/r/MensRights06/12/18 11:51 AM
2

I agree with you, it is suspicious. And yeah, news articles these days always post things like that for the clickbait views. It's always something like "Man arrested for shooing a dog" and then it's like "Man was arrested for shooing a dog. Blah blah blah. And after he shoo'd it he then kicked it so he was arrested".
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:19 AM
12

The way the media portrays these bathroom debacles it should surely be child abuse to expose a kid to such incredible horrors.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:13 AM
8

Not really mens rights. I would guess that women are able to find a rebound a lot easier and have a huge support network of sympathy. Guys will do what guys do and bear the load and deal with it themselves and soldier on.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:06 AM
0

They're saying, if there are people with equivalent skills that the person who is different than the people we already have will be chosen. They're not though, they're saying let's hire this person cos they're BAME, it's the same old story
/r/MensRights29/11/18 05:14 PM
3

But the analogy falls flat because you're not restricted to the tomato pasta sauce aisle. If you're hiring a woman for some kind of mystic woman-only skill that can help your team, and you can't quantify what she's bringing to the table as a woman that other candidates cannot, then you're basically just hiring her for having a pair of breasts. Which is discriminatory. If you're hiring her because women are more likely to have a range of skill you want, then you're still being discriminatory beca…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:29 PM
1

So why is it broken down by skin colour and gender then? Can't white men be diverse? Think we should be looking at exactly what part of the diversity is helping, perhaps if women are considered to be more empathetic then putting that as a criteria in the interview would be better than 'must be a woman'.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:01 PM
3

diversity is a good thing to have in a work place In what way? If you have no people with red hair at your company, would hiring someone with red hair be beneficial?
/r/MensRights29/11/18 08:09 AM
-1

She actually referred to him as perfect. What a bitch, right! /s
/r/MensRights27/11/18 10:16 PM
-1

No it wouldn't. What would you hope to gain out of the situation from replying with that? What's the best case scenario? Her intentions were not malicious, and her question is pretty standard for women that are interested, they often ask something to tease and see if you're a person of interesting character who can tease back. If you get all defensive and butthurt then they know you're not a good candidate and will lose interest.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 10:13 PM
1

So you're saying you think you have the right to be vulgar and crass to other people, and expect a positive reaction, otherwise it's controlling? And you expect that in all situations (such as at the workplace) you should be able to be vulgar and crass? Then you point out that my walmart comment is an asshole thing to do, but you were saying before that it's acceptable for women to say this kind of thing to men. So which is it? Do they have a free pass or not? If it is black and white and you ge…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 10:11 PM
1

Women being attracted to specific physical attributes, like height, is not frowned upon by society at large. I don't think men being attracted to physical attributes, like blondes or brunettes, is frowned upon by society at large either. But the moment a guy says he wants a woman with big ole titties and dick suckin' lips, dear God, by the reaction he gets you'd think he started the Apocalypse. Says to whom? Because if you reworded it so you're not being so vulgar and crass, and said, in general…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 06:32 PM
1

Are you referring to this? women like the one shown in the OP list it as a fucking rule and they attack and shame any men who don't go along with their bullshit. She didn't list it as a rule, she said she hopes the OP is tall because she obviously likes tall guys. She didn't attack him. She didn't shame him. However the person that replied to her did attack her, and did shame her, and did lay down a list of demands. So you can perhaps see why I am confused here. All I'm seeing is misdirected mis…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:52 PM
1

No, you whinged and decided to tell me I didn't read the post, which is ridiculous because how would I be able to reply if I hadn't read it? Then you just had a bit more of a whinge, followed by whinging about a woman having standards that you don't meet, and then a bit more whinging. I mean, jesus dude. Do you live your whole life as angry as this?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:49 PM
2

Well done for managing to write three paragraphs without actually explaining anything about your premise that I am incorrect, I'm actually impressed. If you're resentful that a woman has preferences you're not a part of, then the problem is you.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:43 PM
2

Well, incels blame others for their shortcomings which appears to be what's going on here, I'm using it exactly as it was intended to be used. I can only assume a bunch of people are salty that a woman prefers people taller than her, which is an extremely common reality. Rather than accept that people have preferences of who they are biologically attracted to, and that some of them are non-socialised, they would rather have a whinge about it and villify the woman in question, and support someone…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:37 PM
-19

men are shamed for having said preference Can you back that up? Because every girl I've dated bar one has been younger than me, and I've never been "shamed" for it. In fact the vast majority of all relationships worldwide are between an older man and a younger woman. Have I somehow landed in the incels subreddit? What's going on here?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 03:01 PM
-16

It's hardly a double standard, women are attracted to people taller than them. It's an evolutionary concept and there's tons of research supporting it. She finds the person cute and hopes they are tall, because she's only attracted to tall men. It's completely reasonable to ask her if she has a passion for cooking because you're looking for someone to share that. However the person replying decided to be a total sperglord and throw in a crass sexual comment as well. If you think people stumbling…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 02:57 PM
-29

Girl likes tall men, hopes he's tall, so what? This is a grade A shitpost
/r/MensRights27/11/18 02:14 PM
1

I was banned from /r/uk recently for saying that BBC news publishes an overwhelming number of pro-women / feminist articles. And it goes and publishes something like this a couple of days later, managing to top all of the other articles.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:49 PM
–

and number of women in trench digging and sewage work
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:44 PM
39

And people with ginger hair, or green eyes. You know almost none of the applicants have ginger hair or green eyes! It's disgusting discrimination. so we need slots for people with ginger hair or green eyes because they're very underrepresented.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:43 PM
2

There's always pressure, that wasn't my point, my point was that even with pressure they still have a choice. For men, even if they could choose to raise the child it'd be up to the mother. And usually necessity, them being the higher earner, means they have to be the one that works. As an aside I'm curious to know who is pressuring women to stay at home with their kids though. I mean in this day and age there is so much focus on women becoming successful in their careers it's unreal.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 07:03 PM
5

I'm not sure what you mean by equal decisions. Do you feel that children would be better raised by their parents or by strangers in daycare? By their parents Why do you think that women have the choice and don't feel/have any social pressures when it comes to child rearing? They have the choice because they are not forced by necessity or law to do one or the other. They have social pressure. Everybody is influenced by society in everything they do. But being pressured does not remove the choice.…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 06:59 PM
9

You've just repeated what was already said, I'll repeat what I said as well - that your choices are impacted by external pressure, but your responsibility isn't. You could easily say we don't have many people trying to become doctors because some of the people that want to be are pressured into not going by the fact it's incredibly hard work. Yes, it's hard work, and that impacts your choice, but it's entirely your decision on whether you want to take on that burden or not. You have the choice, …
/r/MensRights25/11/18 12:11 PM
10

It is a terrible one. Fortunately it's not what I said. If it doesn't diminish responsibility then why are you trying to diminish their responsibility by saying they're pressured into it?
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:25 AM
18

The argument that your responsibility is diminished because you are under some kind of external pressure is a terrible one. I could eat, drink, smoke, and do drugs to excess and blame it on the pressure of other people asking me to come out and have a good time, give up my career ambitions because the pressure to perform well and work hard is excessive, etc. I'd have only myself to blame, overcoming adversity and pressure is part of being human and is what makes people excel. Don't make excuses,…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 10:56 AM
1

Bizarre how choice becomes pressure. Generally, men are pressured into working to support their family, while women have the choice of raising their child or working.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 09:00 AM
24

Surreal that we live with a justice system that revolves around people 'being lucky they had an alibi for the exact day and time'. Has anyone stopped to really think about that? That our criminal justice system requires on luck to exonerate yourself.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 05:22 PM
3

It's also part of who men are, their core characters. So when people label these traits as toxic and try to get men to change, it's not changing something socialised, it's trying to change their core nature which will just lead to pain, depression, and confusion. Might as well demand a straight person to be gay, or a gay person to be straight, labelling it 'toxic sexuality' that they're the way they are.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:35 AM
1

Just to society as ran by men.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 07:04 AM
3

Middling to poor results... Practically cured all famine, disease, reached a point where most people will never experience war, some top notch medicine so you're unlikely to die young, you don't have to work yourself to death and can enjoy safety and leisure activities...
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:54 PM
14

Teacher/Parent. Young kids need role models. Especially those from broken homes who have no father figure. My reply is short but the magnitude of this is pretty enormous. I've posted several times in the past about how much of an effect you can have being a male teacher for young boys. It gives them someone to look up to, someone to respect and someone that will respect them back, based on their behaviour. You can imagine how little respect a young boy from a broken home gets from men. The answe…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:59 PM
3

Setting a nice example to other ladies that you can influence the world stage by lying with no repercussions
/r/MensRights03/11/18 08:31 AM
2

Thanks! I'll check them out.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 12:13 AM
15

You seem quite knowledgeable about this. Do you know a good book I can read that discusses it in detail? It's so hard to be informed about the whole thing from an unbiased view. Edit: great replies, I meant more about the suffrage movement with regards to men. Everything I've seen is anti men and explains how they kept women down, never anything like the above. I'd love to read about it in more depth.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 12:44 PM
6

Yup. That's what the title says.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 04:39 PM
1

I'll have you know that I have 5 kids and another one the way, daddy isn't in my life anymore and you better be just fine with that or walk on
/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:57 PM
19

Isn't that the same argument for stopping rape though? Educate men not to rape! Educate women not to false report! You can give all the education in the world but it will still happen.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:59 PM
7

They can and do that already. We need to bring about a change in society that stops people playing victim. If something bad happens to you, yes it's difficult to report, but be an adult and, go and do it. Or don't, and then nothing will come over it. And we should have a limit to reporting so it doesn't surface 20 years later to destroy someone's life with no real evidence or investigation possible.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 10:34 PM
10

Probably go 'OMG men in the women's locker room?????' 'No, the other way around' 'Huh I don't understand' 'Women in the mens locker rooms' 'Oh. Well we'll consider your request.' <in the bin>
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:35 PM
5

Let's look at some random stats of something nobody has been able to properly measure.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:30 AM
20

But the process of creating a role model for something people aren't interested in, in order to get them to do that thing, isn't equality - if you're trying to get them to do something you believe that there's an imbalance, but there isn't, it's just preference what people do. I don't see any advocation for people who have ginger hair to be on the boards, or people that are exactly 5'9", or any other attribute you're born with.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:29 AM
1

But the process of creating a role model for something people aren't interested in, in order to get them to do that thing, isn't equality - if you're trying to get them to do something you believe that there's an imbalance, but there isn't, it's just preference what people do. I don't see any advocation for people who have ginger hair to be on the boards, or people that are exactly 5'9", or any other attribute you're born with.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:29 AM
2

You use the word obviously a lot but I don't believe it is obvious. I don't think we have been in a situation where someone has said 'prosecuting all these false accusers is not working, let's scrap it'.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 07:54 AM
2

You'd be the bad guy, and you're inviting a bunch of white knights to beat the crap out of you when she starts roaring and telling people you hit her
/r/MensRights07/10/18 05:54 AM
2

Buddy? Such a heteronormative conjecture! You'll refer to me as lordkin or I'll brand you a trans shamer.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 10:20 PM
4

The winning move is to drop to the floor and remain motionless. No joke that is what I would do. Become unresponsive and it is literally the only way to turn the situation into a serious one. Someone will need to summon medical help, authorities will be notified, the one sidedness of the situation will be appropriately noticed by all parties, etc.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 10:14 PM
15

FGM also reduces HIV. There was a harvard study on it. The study was taken down because it upset feminists. You can find it if you Google a bunch.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 10:08 PM
3

Miss moneypenny? You'll fine that xhe is not a miss.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 10:04 PM
1

Jake Bullet
/r/MensRights06/10/18 10:02 PM
19

assuming they're campaigning to close the female/male treatment divide, they didn't get any of what they asked for.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:01 PM
34

If it's only for male on male it's more a step to the side, because if you were to draw a timeline showing the different steps required to make it apply to female on male, this wouldn't be one of them.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:58 PM
1

It was a top level post, it just looks like a reply because I can only view it via a permalink
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:27 AM
6

I messaged the mods, they said neither the link nor the body of the message was appropriate.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 12:13 AM
1

That's fair enough but it creates an image when a movement clings to one or two particular articles, it detracts from the idea that a movement has issues to protest against when it repeats the same couple of incidents over and over. People wonder, is that really an ongoing thing? If they're just perpetuating the same incident over and over? Kinda like saying, there are so many murders in my city and repeatedly posting a single murder over and over as evidence.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 07:38 PM
1

It's an very old meme
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/18 04:44 PM
3

This has been reposted a very large number of times, and I've even seen it reposted in the past week
/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:05 PM
1

Ah, I see...
/r/MensRights28/09/18 05:24 PM
1

Voat is basically 4chan the forum, it's a cesspit. I agree with freedom of expression but some moderation is required, like forcing people to at least keep it civil.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 05:07 PM
1

Probably looking for her DNA on his junk.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 12:34 PM
3

It's no mystery, but it's long-winded to explain. It's in our DNA and it's a consequence of our evolution and the way suitable mates are selected. Sadly we can't just have, all the strong guys that don't take shit reproduce with the females, and the ones that aren't strong don't, instead it's a sliding scale, with those lower down the ladder begging for scraps. They have the same instincts as those at the top of the hierarchy, which is to basically be like the dominant lion, protecting the herd,…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:11 PM
4

I bet if you asked one of these ladies if they'd rather the frustrated creepy betas stayed at home and whacked off into their gym socks or instead were unleashed to hit on women, they'd go for the former. But for some reason if said gym sock is inside a giant lifelike silicone doll, then they suddenly care about the thirsty creepy betas doing that. It genuinely makes me think their biggest concern is not being able to turn them down. Like, I don't want guys to hit on me but I want to be their on…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 08:00 PM
14

Make no mistake, that isn’t a doll he’s doing, or maybe raping, choking, or hitting — it’s all those women he can’t measure up to. How do you rape or choke a sex doll? Maybe one day it will be a real woman. Just finished playing some GTA, maybe one day I'll go around murdering real people because of it. Men do not have a right to sex. It's interesting that the fact they want to gatekeep men's access to sex is used as a defense against men simply going elsewhere. It's like walmart saying you don'…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 06:24 PM
2

I still feel that should be them. I would only use the male pronoun if you're describing something that can obviously be done by both male and female people. In the case of your competition it suggests it's for males. If it's for an instruction booklet on operating a dishwasher, then it's just an appliance anyone can use and we know that, so he or she would be fine
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:11 PM
3

Yes, but don't you think that implying that one gender is a victim and one gender is an instigator of violence might not give the neutral expression you're suggesting, in this case?
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:26 PM
2

What are you talking about, are you trying to say the male pronoun is considered the default? Because if you're talking about something unrelated to gender I can get behind that, but if you're talking about people then it's not acceptable.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:28 AM
7

I play online games, I get called a gay ass faggot and to kill myself like 5 times a day, yawn
/r/MensRights11/09/18 07:07 PM
1

That just isnt how it plays out practically ever and I'm pretty sure you would get an eye roll or told its a civil matter in several places I can think of. How do you know? There aren't really any stories where the guy refuses to pay. I mean, if you pay for the food you ate, how can you be liable for the rest? If you pay for both of you it will become a civil matter to get the money back off the other person, but if you simply explain that you agreed to separate checks then I can't see how it's …
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:03 PM
0

How isnt it the same as a woman who doesnt like the date just ditching not paying? It's not different, which is why it isn't a gendered issue. If a woman also did the same thing you're within your rights to pay your half, you will likely have to talk to the police though. The only problem is that men accept it's a possibility when dating, and will just suck it up and pay it. The same as in this situation, as the guy did it quite a lot of times and women did indeed pay on many occasions.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:12 PM
9

This isn't a mensrights story, some dickhead went on dates and then walked out without paying. That's not the same as the woman expecting the man to pay. The double standard is when the check arrives, in some cases the woman will expect the man to pay. But he doesn't have to, if they agreed to pay half each then he can just pay for his half, and she will have to pay for her half. He has the option to refuse to pay more than his half. But climbing out of a toilet window after ordering the most ex…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:17 PM
2

Wow the logic is amazing "It's absolutely ridiculous, it's PC gone mad. I mean the connotations of mum traditionally, mums are the providers of the breakfast, the children, going out to school, doing things for mums, I don't think that marginalises fathers at all. I think Chris you're dumping on a bandwagon. You're trying to jump on the bandwagon and ex-communicate and actually it's quite divisive to change from mums to parents to fathers, everybody could be a parent but biologically everyone ha…
/r/MensRights07/09/18 12:08 PM
1

Ugh that's so incredibly evil. To take away someone's once in a lifetime chance of something amazing, and then have them know afterwards what they missed out on.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 07:18 AM
4

It's challenging the socially prominent idea that mothers are responsible for raising children, surely anything that moves to abolish that is a good thing? Perhaps when society sees a man take their daughter out for breakfast, people will think 'how strange', or ask 'is that his daughter?' And these are major issues. But then ask why they say that. The answer is because the sum of many small things in their lives tell them that it's the mother's job to raise the child. From commercials with moth…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:43 PM
6

Problem is there are thousands of micro-problems, so you can never address any of them if you declare them too small
/r/MensRights05/09/18 03:07 PM
1

Everyone's talking about genetics and social paradigms and I'm just wondering who would do all the work
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:05 PM
29

But it's unfair that men can have children and not quit their job. What she needs to do is find a husband that will stay at home and raise the child. Of course she won't do this, because what she really wants is to have a career and raise a child. Which men can't do either when they're working all week.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:34 PM
22

Can't help but feel a life insurance policy would be a small fee to pay to sort most of those out. Personally I'll pay the extra tax rather than take the risk of financial ruin.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:27 AM
13

Perhaps if he was a better husband she wouldn't have had to cheat on him, we can't blame her
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:21 AM
2

I think it's because we're programmed to create construct and improve. If a friend said to me can you come and help me cut down this massive prickly bush on a hot summers day, I would certainly agree to it. Some hard work with a guaranteed satisfaction pay off that needs doing is irresistible to me. I think the same goes for any kind of labour intensive job for men.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:51 AM
1

I've found in my experience there are two types of person, those who go to work but don't really care about it and will just gossip and talk and try to make work a way to mess around, and those who work very hard and serious. It's the latter group that has a problem with the former group. For women, they tend to socialise much less, be quite alone during work, work much harder. They tend to have their own life outside of work, often a family, so they don't socialise much with coworkers. I don't …
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:42 AM
1

I hate my boss with a passion as he is an incompetent power hungry moron. But I am nice as pie to him because it's better for my life and career if he likes me. I think it's like that.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:35 AM
1

Would like to read feedback on how the party goers enjoyed the event
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:20 AM
2

They all want to be a victim, cos you get a free pass, all the sympathy you could ever want. And sympathy is a form of validation, which is like crack to most women - just open facebook or instagram.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:51 PM
2

I wonder how that impacts societal perceptions of this case Well, the metoo people will probably cry that it was an injustice that this came to light and be oblivious to the implications of such a big lie on the movement. Meanwhile the Patriarchy will just quietly take note and take another step back to distance themselves from women. Women, so hireable right now.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:49 PM
2

To a big degree, after the incels subreddit shut down they flocked to other subs that would help them continue to whine about victimisation. It happened in TheRedPill as well, that sub is a shitshow now and not worth reading.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:08 AM
1

The gesture is worth a thousand times what the gift is.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:11 AM
1

Owing a debt is not the same as stealing something and having an onus to give it back. Theft is the intention to permanently deprive, which is what he did. Its straight up theft even if they wrote it off or they were compensated for it.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:47 AM
39

Well written post.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:38 AM
7

Yeah, it's considered funny if it happens to a guy.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 08:31 AM
1

Good lad
/r/MensRights28/08/18 10:34 AM
1

Nice that might be a better solution than the thing I cobbled together!
/r/MensRights27/08/18 08:29 AM
1

I think it changes once you're signed up and logged in, and then you click the checkout icon
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:43 PM
6

Excellent spot
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:42 PM
1

Aye, I have that but it only redirects sometimes, and it puts ads into your google search :( Not sure why the script doesn't work though - it changes the checkout button so when you click it it will change to smile. Just because I end up closing + reopening all kinds of tabs and stuff while I'm searching and I can lose the smile prefix Does look like you have to sign up, I tried it on amazon.com and while it didn't redirect to smile a message came up asking me to sign up for it.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:32 PM
4

He's suggesting eye for an eye, if a person ruins another person's life, then perhaps that person should suffer an equal punishment themselves. Something that the current justice system does not provide. It seems reasonable on the face of it, especially when the current punishment tends to be incredibly lenient to the point of being useless.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:49 PM
3

You've changed the context of the debate, first you generalised about the prison system as a whole being a place for rehabilitation, to which I replied that the system as whole clearly does not (on the whole) do that, and you said the system as a whole isn't perfect but it's better than the alternative, and I said the system as a whole being better than an alternative is subjective and that often rehabilitation fails so we keep people like caged hamsters very expensively, which seems needless. A…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:15 PM
3

Paying tons of taxpayer money to maintain some scumbags life and keep them in a box? I think that's subjective. If someone has no chance of rehabilitation or rehabilitation fails several times, then perhaps just keeping them locked up and feeding them isn't the best solution.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 11:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter