TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NiceAndRespectable Archive

View 0 posts and 61 comments by NiceAndRespectable on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Genuinely can't tell if troll or standard idiot feminist.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 02:14 PM
1

Hopefully one day, with the tireless work of feminists like yourself, rape and employment discrimination against women will one day be outlawed.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 11:52 AM
1

Surprisingly insightful quote from anything in The Guardian. Of course, all other gender-related content of theirs will refuse to accept the implications of that quote.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 10:06 PM
1

A fight for women at the expense of men can be good. Women gained the right to vote at the great direct political expense of men. But the title of your OP is 100% correct, because feminism today is not the feminism of a century ago. Feminism a century ago was about individualism and equal legal rights. Feminism today is about "male privilege," i.e. socially acceptable self-pity and bigotry.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 12:09 AM
1

It's fiction and was designed to get clicks from places like this subreddit.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 03:37 AM
4

Like I said, fucking jaw-dropping how transparent it is now.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:33 PM
9

Exactly. Horrific conditions are tolerated for men. This is yet more blatant feminist bigotry. Most women who end up behind bars would be better off being cared for outside prison, a leading expert has said. Well no fucking shit. Pretty much every prisoner would be better off being cared for outside of prison, wouldn't they? A Scottish government spokesman said it had provided extra funding to local Community Justice Partnerships to deliver support for female offenders and was working to transfo…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 09:19 PM
9

Everyone is for sex inequality. No one is for equal incarceration. No one is for equal sex work. Those things wouldn't make any sense. Equality between the sexes is obviously impossible. Feminists solely seek pro-female change (fine), but call it "equality" for moral authority (not fine). Many/most feminists believe that men and women are equal psychologically, such that the wage gap must be the result of discrimination or oppressive gender biases in society. But if there was actually no group d…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 09:45 PM
27

Quote from video at 1:42 She remembers the man went down at one point before the cell phone video recorded the very end. Want to elaborate about that at all? Ask her questions? Include her answers in the video or article? I mean, we all know how common it is for men to assault women unprovoked on a brightly lit street while numerous unaffiliated men and women laugh and cheer. Right? Common patriarchy shit.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 03:16 PM
5

Feminism is responsible for men losing the right to equal protection and due process. I consider feminism's support of employment discrimination and sexual authoritarianism to be obviously way more important and persuasive issues to the general population than focusing on smaller downstream issues like father's rights. No offense to any dads out there going through a difficult time right now... I just don't understand how you can think it's a good idea to ignore feminism. It's a hate movement.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 09:42 AM
0

Why do people like you exist? You said excuse. Guilty people need excuses. Plus it's just fucking obvious that that was your intent?? God what a stupid cunt you are, eh? Edit for posterity: genius dude /u/Zeldom deleted the following reply to this post that I'm currently editing: I explained the meaning behind distracting because like I said you have trouble understanding words then made a generalized statement about the implications of a boss saying that to an employee. But yes by all means I’l…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:05 PM
1

Source? You're assuming. You've read a rephrasing of the accusers account and have assumed guilt. Maybe you're right. It would be more right to admit you don't know.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 10:06 AM
2

I don't see too many serious people outside of gender studies and hardcore feminist circles genuinely claiming that men and women should have identical outcomes. Again, you can find examples on the margins of every group, but by and large people tend to be more thoughtful and benevolent than you seem to believe. I really liked your post except for this. I have worked with and gone to grad school with LOTS of young feminists over the last five years. Almost universally, they support labor discrim…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:02 AM
1

Well just based on that NPR article, he didn't say she was too distracting to be his producer. Allegedly, he said (it's mentioned that this happened in a car the night after she met him at his apartment, which I don't understand the significance of at all) that she was too distracting to be a producer... whatever that means. We have no idea what the actual sentence he said was or what the context was, and our only source of information is the accuser and a (female) journalist working for a left-…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 05:20 AM
3

I agree. Understanding that equality is nonsensical doesn't justify perpetuating any specific gender bias in society.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:46 PM
7

My experience has been similar, except... I no longer observe a movement for equality, I observe a grasp for supremacy. It will be another 100 years before there is a true cultural equilibrium amongst the sexes. Feminism hasn't been about equality at any point in my life. They dishonestly claim to want equality while actually only wanting pro-female change in society (not that there's anything wrong with that by itself). Equality is an absurd concept anyway. For example, try to find a feminist, …
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:41 PM
1

Umm? This is obviously a joke, used to argue for women's right to vote. It's satirizing the arguments against giving women the right to vote. Sidenote: When a feminist today cries about this past oppression, you might point out that the last time that unwilling young men were forced to kill and die for the country was 1975, which is closer in time to today than the 19th amendment was to 1975. The feminist will say something really fucking stupid in response (usually about how all presidents have…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:28 PM
5

Unbelievably stupid. While stealthing was given an official name only within the last few years, the practice has been going on for several years in the gay community. Nevertheless, stealthing has gained traction in the heterosexual community, in large part through online discussion boards relating to the Men’s Rights Movement. But only three paragraphs later... Simply put, the “manosphere” perpetuates the idea that “sexual entitlement to women [is a] right.” This notion of sexual entitlement is…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 09:37 PM
-1

I don't mean to say that I think the ad is going to be some huge success. I agree about it being a small part of their branding. But I will say that it's already obviously not going to be the PR problem that similar controversial, "socially-conscious" ads have been (like Pepsi's Kylie Jenner one). I guess what bothers me is that people are getting so angry at this amoral entity instead of, if deciding to discuss it at all, breaking down the stupidity of the various scenes/messages that make up t…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 01:05 AM
-5

Downvotes and pointless replies... reminds me of feminist subreddits.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:54 PM
1

I didn't include the stock news to prove that it's been positive for the company. The massive amounts of publicity are what make it positive. If this "movement" had any real chance of counteracting the positive effect of this publicity, then the tone of that article would be completely different. They love this. They love these posts on r/mensrights. It would be funny that I'm being downvoted except that this ignorance and stupid anger is why feminism remains so powerful.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 10:36 PM
1

It's already positive. They banked on all this. They want you to say their name. That's it. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/pgs-gillette-ad-asks-men-to-shave-their-toxic-masculinity-and-a-big-backlash-ensues-2019-01-15 P&G said it has no plans to pull the spot in the face of some negative reaction, The Wall Street Journal reported. “We recognize it’s sparking a lot of passionate dialogue — at the same time, it’s getting people to stop and think about what it means to be our best selves, which …
/r/MensRights16/01/19 10:14 PM
1

The ad was purposefully triggering to y'all, just FYI. They understood that they were poking at a double standard that would provoke that sweet, sweet, polarized outrage.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 08:20 PM
1

Learn to read you fucking moron.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:57 AM
1

Except they lived their life that way and entered the marriage at least in part because of alimony law.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:46 AM
2

The mental health industry fails to help men, and these guidelines are nothing but a weak, politicized gesture at helping men. If women were killing and drinking/drugging themselves to death at the rates men are, there wouldn't be some meaningless (at best) report about it. The entire industry would be overhauled. Actually, it's silly to even think about since our society would never let it get to that point in the first place. Just a couple things from the NBC article you linked (there's too mu…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 11:38 PM
1

A lot of states don't have it anymore. It's a bit of a tough thing to get rid of, politically. Men have a strong social incentive to appear unthreatened by things like alimony. And whether you're single or married, it's just a bad look to be complaining about divorce law. I think most women would honestly say they're against alimony if asked, especially younger women, but it's obviously not something that they have an incentive to vocally oppose either. There are also real cases of asshole guys …
/r/MensRights11/01/19 09:37 PM
7

Written by a man: Encourage men to advocate for policy changes that support women. Men, for example, should be protesting DeVos’ proposed changes to the Title IX rules that apply to college sexual assault cases. To be sure, the process must be fair for both parties. Yet we cannot make it harder for survivors to get the justice they deserve. Men are more likely to know and care about victims than to be falsely accused. Allowing the accused to cross-examine their accuser, even through a lawyer or …
/r/MensRights11/01/19 06:28 PM
9

Don't all of you read that story and kind of hate the guy? More than you would kind of hate a woman acting that way? Men and women are different. Men have an expectation (a desire or need, even) to protect. Personally, I don't mind that expectation as long as it's vaguely acknowledged, or at the very least not leveraged against me in political debates.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 09:59 AM
1

Alimony is a legal consequence of entering into a legal agreement: marriage. Victims of theft, by definition, never entered into any agreement about the fate of their lost property.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 09:54 AM
1

Perhaps that's the reality for a lot of people, but it really isn't "the fundamental reality of life". This is right, but then you say, Suffering exists, but life isn't filled with it. Which is wrong for the same reason what you were replying to is wrong. Perhaps life isn't filled with suffering for a lot of people...
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:41 AM
1

"You're rude so I'll assume you're wrong without reading anything."
/r/MensRights06/01/19 05:26 PM
1

I gave you a logical reason. You've ignored it. Please become a feminist. You would help us.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:11 PM
1

Oh cool that was easy. Fucking read a bit before going off on shit you know nothing about.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:06 PM
1

You're misunderstanding helps feminism. Here you are, an apparent "men's rights activist" complaining about feminism and being totally fucking wrong about it. That helps feminism.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:04 PM
1

You are incorrect, and this story has been posted in this sub like five times now. The guy in this case is a victim of authoritarian feminism (and I encourage anyone who's interested to read this, but you people stupidly eating up this fake news about his height have no understanding of what's going on, and these dumbass videos only help feminism.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:00 PM
3

This case is over. The police department instituted the physical test in 2014. Twelve female officers failed the test on their first try and sued in federal court 2015. The judge ruled in favor of the female officers in July 2017, but apparently the damages portion of the trail wasn't concluded before the parties settled for $2.5M in January 2018. You can read the judge's ruling for the officers here. Reliance on an employment test that disparately impacts members of a protected class is “imperm…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 02:42 PM
1

You're a fucking moron not worth trying to communicate with. I regret my actions.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 01:02 AM
1

I'm insulting you because you deserve it for defending this, and for continuing to defend it. You ask me for the source when it's in the fucking links here, and then accuse me of not having read much on this, then hilariously immediately say that you've presumed something which is WRONG and which you could have corrected yourself on by reading the fucking links here. She told him to go to the class: Jeremy, I really appreciate your feedback about my class and choreography, but these messages are…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 12:42 AM
1

She told him that she wanted him to go to the class. You've read some authoritarian bullshit and bought into it without actually examining their claims. "seems further that he could be in a position that supervised some aspect of her education" What the fuck are you even talking about? This is FUCKING NONSENSE. I can't believe you idiots are buying into the university's line of this. Fucking pathetic to be honest.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 12:25 AM
1

You're just stating things with nothing to back it up. What about his conduct was bad such that "something" should have been "brought down on him". I think anyone who reads the facts here and thinks he deserved any sort of real punishment is an authoritarian piece of shit.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 11:16 PM
0

PLEASE READ THIS
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:13 AM
1

NO NO NO NO NO NO Holy fucking shit am I tired of hearing this. I'm sorry to be rude, but for some reason, this story keeps popping up in my life, and I've REPEATEDLY seen people making this IGNORANT assumption that you've made because Kat Timpf's incompetence opened the door for everyone to throw this guy under the bus. ...ON THE MEN'S RIGHTS SUBREDDIT! (and other places too, but fuck is it ironic and disturbing to see it here multiple times) It's seriously driving me fucking insane. What happe…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:11 AM
6

Snopes The legitimacy of Warren’s claims to Native American heritage has certainly been challenged by many critics, and it is true that while Warren was at U. Penn. Law School she put herself on the “Minority Law Teacher” list as Native American) in the faculty directory of the Association of American Law Schools, and that Harvard Law School at one time promoted Warren as a Native American faculty member. But specific evidence that she gained her position at Harvard (at least in part) through he…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 04:42 PM
8

Well you know they're all victims of misogyny, and therefore entitled to legally enforced discrimination, the moment the sperm with an X wins. I forgot how much I missed these boilerplate, worthless, clickbait articles. Has it already been two years? There's literally one piece of relevant information in this hack shit: Warren’s relatively low numbers appear driven by her unpopularity among men. When the University of Massachusetts asked state residents whom they support in the 2020 Democratic p…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 02:38 PM
1

Thank you for taking the time to answer. I asked about anarchist feminism because it seems contradictory to me. I think of feminism as an authoritative, solely pro-female force now, while what you're describing sounds to me like basic individualistic values plus some egalitarianism or maybe gender critical values. What do you think of this or this, for example? I consider both to be direct consequences of feminism and perfect examples of why I hate feminism now, despite agreeing with the feminis…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 10:46 AM
1

Can you describe your views on your own gender? Why do you call yourself a woman instead of something else or nothing? What does an anarchist feminist advocate for?
/r/MensRights02/01/19 10:59 PM
2

Yes, from the little I can stand reading TRP, most of the complaints are hypocritical or at least simple-minded. Young men in TRP see the truths above, which are glossed over by the media, but espoused on TRP, become so incredibly hateful towards women, and decide to go 'MGTOW' without due consideration of the whole picture. Well I think you just summed it up. Is it so surprising that lower status men who face what you described as disgust from many women might get really angry when they see thi…
/r/ExRedPill02/01/19 04:22 AM
1

I don't think that's damning at all. These facts, just what's been quoted by both of us, definitely don't support a criminal harassment conviction because I don't see how you could think that this guy intended to harass, annoy, or alarm Breaux. Again, just based on these quotes, I don't see how you conclude anything except that he intended to be with her romantically, and that he's an incredibly awkward person. To infer otherwise would have required Breaux putting him on notice that he was haras…
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:12 PM
1

It is not a legitimate harassment case. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/aa80du/student_found_to_have_violated_title_ix_by_asking/ecrbivh/
/r/MensRights28/12/18 09:25 PM
3

The article is retracted now, so I'm guessing you are right about it being misleading, but your framing of the facts is not quite right either: https://kcjohnson.files.wordpress.com/2018/12/Mizzou-Rowles-summary-judgment-motion.pdf Breaux thought Rowles was friendly, and she did not interpret his behavior or comments as flirtatious because she thought he was gay. Then, on April 12, 2016, Rowles asked Breaux out on a date after their dance class. Breaux felt extremely uncomfortable and told him s…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 09:24 PM
1

I don't think what he did is an ok thing to do. What the consequences are is another question and depends on how he responded to everything as well as a lot of other details. ... Now, keep in mind that many feminists believe that you can't consent to sexual acts if you're drunk enough, so if you're talking to one of them, maybe what he did was ok, because he couldn't consent to her vagina causing him to ejaculate. I don't know. This might depend on how comparably drunk they were, or whether he a…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:19 PM
24

Yes well women deserve greater social protection from such insults because they are small, weak, and psychologically unable to handle the same sorts of attacks that we men can endure. Don't you know anything about feminism? smh
/r/MensRights24/12/18 03:19 PM
1

put down half of the human population. Because you identify so strongly as a part of both the [woman] group and the [piece of shit feminist] group (which is not even the whole [feminist] group), you were attacked for doing [piece of shit feminist] things like call a man a loser because he criticizes your narcissistic movement, and you interpret that as attacking the [woman] group.
/r/ExRedPill23/12/18 01:42 AM
1

Jesus reread the thread. You seem stupid.
/r/ExRedPill16/12/18 06:09 PM
1

How is equality between two groups possible when one of the groups gives birth and the other doesn't? Even if men and women, as groups, are exactly equal psychologically (which is honestly a very silly thing to think is true, and is basically scientifically illiterate at this point), the exclusive ability/burden to give birth has huge ramifications on behavior. The difference in strength and body size, another inarguable group difference for men and women, also has ramifications on behavior. Thi…
/r/ExRedPill15/12/18 08:23 PM
1

Yo wtf are you even talking about then? So every man has been subjected to this terrible treatment, as you yourself say, but women are the oppressed ones? Boys get treated "terribly" and end up killing themselves and other men a lot more, but women's representation in government is the real problem in this society? And have you ever stopped to think there might be a connection between getting terrible treatment as a child and the frequently-unhealthy personality traits that lead to becoming a po…
/r/ExRedPill15/12/18 01:53 AM
0

You seem reasonably intelligent, so I think you're at the end because you realize, on some level, the inconsistency in your positions about representation, and you find cognitive dissonance uncomfortable. Why would the Senate be comparable to the general population? It should be representative of the demographics of people who feel incentivized and take actions to become political leaders Edit: by the way, it's super fucking insulting to claim that women's position in dating is not an advantage.…
/r/ExRedPill14/12/18 03:30 PM
–

hmmm.. homelessness, addiction, education gap, and incarceration gap are because of women and feminism? No. Can you read? You waited a week to reply and this is what you say? Do you see how there's no reason for a random person on the internet to take you seriously? Why did you even reply?
/r/ExRedPill
–

Hmmmmmmmmmmm Nothing on homelessness. Nothing on addiction. Nothing on education gap. Nothing on incarceration gap. ERA stuff for no apparent reason. What rights do you think that amendment would achieve? I guess you had this suicide attempt argument ready to go though, so that's cool. And you don't cite a source for this attempt gap, which is wise because self-harm and genuine suicide attempts are often impossible to distinguish. And why would it be a substantive response to my point about your…
/r/ExRedPill
–

It's about equal rights and social change. To quote yourself from elsewhere in this thread: Did you miss the memo? Women have equal rights. Women's suffrage was completed nationally in 1920. Unwilling boys were sent to die as recently as 1975, and it's still true that men and only men are forced to sign up for selective service. It just hasn't been enforced lately. There continues to be bias against women of the same root kind as that that resulted in the need for women's suffrage, but there con…
/r/ExRedPill
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter