TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NietzscheanStoic Archive

View 9 posts and 743 comments by NietzscheanStoic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, not zero sum. But sex and procreation is an economy and the same market forces apply. I'm looking at this from the perspective of Collective Bargaining. The point of Collective Bargaining is to create scarcity in the market in an attempt to get a better deal, a bit like a labor union versus a corporation. Right now the market is flooded by guys willing to give females lots attention for absolutely free, including attention and services that should be reserved for boyfriends and husbands. It'…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/18 08:07 PM
1

You tell me
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/18 01:26 PM
1

Very insightful response. Thank you. If feminism has demonstrated anything, it is that feminism is a ploy to dismantle civilization and the sexual equity tied to it. It is essentially sexual Darwinism of men fighting over low-quality females. Give feminism enough time unhindered, we'd be back in the Paleolithic Era.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/18 01:25 PM
1

Correct. While you don't care one way or another, mingling with women lowers the sexual bargaining power of men and helps to create insufferable, entitled females.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/18 01:12 PM
1

Just giving them attention over-inflates their market value. Giving them friendship is stupid. They gain more from it than men do and makes men seem desperate. It's not as bad a beta orbiting but it's still pretty bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/18 11:32 PM
1

It by definition does.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/18 02:06 AM
2

Nietzschean doesn't mean hedonistic degenerate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 08:37 PM
2

Which Slavic part of Europe? Because I'm pretty sure whatever mingling you have isn't anywhere near the mingling that Americans refer to when they say "friend". And yes, I know, it is the same word and it depends on context and I also know that it is rather confusing for the older generations of Slavs where that word, when a woman refers to a man as her "friend" meant someone she is dating. That is what I was telling two other people. And also, it is expected that once a woman is taken, that oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 08:27 PM
2

Really both sexes should. And I'm not using Catholic reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 08:23 PM
2

I think I need to invent a new pill because all the other pills suck to some degree or another. The Null Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:59 PM
1

If most men did this, there would be a hell of a lot fewer problems with unplanned pregnancies, regretful sex, and all the other risks that come from casual sex. Or, just keep it in your pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:58 PM
7

Sure. You don't bully friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:55 PM
6

Don't know. Though I would completely understand it if they did. Don't want to be called a vile whore or a cunt? Don't bully.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:51 PM
1

Fair enough. My train of thought is on the sexual economy as a whole, because that most basic human function/interaction seems to affect everything other kind of interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:49 PM
2

So you are from the Anglo-sphere. I figured, since genuine continental European attitudes aren't so liberal as they are for Americans, British, Australians, and Kiwis.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:40 PM
1

Congratulations on your harem of platonic females I guess? While things like that are of no concern to you - and good on you mate - you are still fucking it up for other guys. But American men are so cucked right now that it probably doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:38 PM
2

Are you German, or an American living on a military base? Because you sound American.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:36 PM
2

The point remains, the mingling of the sexes in such a way is a very, very recent invention.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:34 PM
2

Better listeners or not, guys who maintain friendships with women are selling themselves way short and are helping to fuck up the male-female sexual dynamic. It's egalitarian bullshit of meaningless mingling between the sexes. It's a brilliant feminist coup, though. Get dudes to behave like boyfriends for free, don't have to be their girlfriend! It benefits females far more than males. Absolutely cucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:30 PM
2

Must be a weird American/British thing. Because in many other cultures - even in many European ones, men and women maintain a certain distance unless they are dating/sexual. It's like American men are desperate or something and they'll take platonic over nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:20 PM
2

My logic: you are giving the benefits of a boyfriend to a girl some other guy is fucking. How is that not cucked?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:16 PM
3

confused Well that didn't take long ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 06:55 PM
1

So then shouldn't another word be used? What I find interesting, and I mentioned this in response to someone else, is that English is one of the only languages I am aware of that makes a differentiation between a friend you are dating versus a friend you are not dating. For instance, most languages do not have "girlfriend" or "boyfriend". Instead, they use the equivalent word for "friend". Meaning, if a man has a "friend" that is female, he is dating her. Otherwise he does not call her a friend,…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 06:53 PM
0

but that doesn't invalidate friendships in the same way differences and tension between male friends doesn't invalidate male friendships That's pretty cucked. Either that or people throw around this "friend" word way too lightly. To demonstrate my point, English is one of the only languages that I am aware of where there is a separate word for a friend that you fuck versus a friend that you don't. Even in nearly all Indo-European languages, a female who is referred to as a "friend" is someone yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 06:47 PM
3

an interesting interpretation of me laughing at you That damage control...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 06:40 PM
6

Not in the same way straight ones can. Sexuality interferes in the platonic dynamic
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 06:31 PM
7

That's a rationalization. You will never be a friend to a guy in the same way another guy will be. The whole "friendship" is extremely new in the human saga. The article tells as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 06:18 PM
3

triggered you You're projecting there, mate. I'm not the one that had an epic spasmatic seizure because someone decided to drop an article.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 06:14 PM
12

Sure. Those are the guys that believe they have something better than you or just aren't attracted. They could also be using you to increase their own SMV (i.e. being seen with you to attract available women)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 05:46 PM
12

It's bullying. It's no different than say high school jocks and cheerleaders bullying nerds.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 05:44 PM
8

Men and women are not capable of being friends in the same way they are with their own sex. This whole platonic mingling thing between the sexes is entirely new in the long span of human evolution. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9425245/Mens-friendships-with-women-driven-by-sexual-attraction.html
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 05:37 PM
1

You are correct. Outside of selective pressures, the reason is... eugenics. Selective breeding. Europeans and East Asians have high socioeconomic standards for mate selection. Another reason has been geography. The Sahara Desert, the Sinai Peninsula and the Mediterranean kept Sub-Saharans mostly Sub-Saharan. For East Asians, the plains and steppes of Central and West Asia were too dangerous for them, being full of marauders (why the Great Wall was built). And Europe has mountains and oceans whic…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 05:30 PM
4

That is because of evolution. IQ is more of a measure of being able to adapt and contribute to civilization - which is something that tended to spring up in places with harsher environments because of the need to plan ahead and specialize in tasks. You didn't really need that in Africa since resources were and still are pretty abundant there and its not like they have harsh winters or killer rainy seasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 05:03 PM
2

You've never seen people with squashed-ass noses? And what do you consider "enormous" physical differences? Height? Weight? Facial-cranial bone structure? There is something called "Phenotype" and is applied to humans all the time by science. For instance, there are European phenotypes and there are African and Asia phenotypes. And humans have been the masters of selective breeding, even with each other. I seriously doubt that you, for instance, will mate with anything that crosses your path. I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 04:51 PM
6

Whoa there lass! Before you go all turbospaz on me, at least let me clarify my position. While I don't doubt that there is a difference in pay, I don't like the agenda that is often coupled with most mentioned of the "pay gap" which is: OMG LE EBIL PATRIARCHIES111!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 04:42 PM
2

Nope, not wholly. MOSTLY. We have enough wiggle room to increase our IQ by a few points due to environmental input, but that's it. And the comparison does work. Like dogs, humans were also selectively bred by... HUMANS! loooooooool
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 04:15 PM
1

Yeah man. So the amount of free shit wymyn get on the public dime makes up for the gap. No double dipping! :D
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 04:07 PM
1

IQ is MOSTLY inherited and predicts many life outcomes. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23358156 And all dogs evolved from a common wolf ancestor yet look at all the differences in dog breeds. Like night and day.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 04:00 PM
3

But women also consume more government services than they pay into with taxes. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375926
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 03:49 PM
2

Awww you're so sweet! <3
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 03:08 PM
5

Take responsibility for your own failures. Stop looking for scapegoats.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 03:02 PM
7

Low effort replies hurt even more.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 03:01 PM
7

I stop reading not when it makes me feel uncomfortable, but when it is bullshit that has been repeatedly debunked. It's fake news. So when "statistics" start off with nonsense, it'll get dismissed pretty quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 02:57 PM
2

I don't think you understand how evolution works. You are making the blank slate fallacy. Obviously certain qualities are inherent because if they weren't, you'd be at an evolutionary disadvantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 02:55 PM
1

The 1960s are over, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 02:25 PM
1

What really bugs me about it though is the blatant hatred towards women. Maybe it's because incels have apparently taken over but I think it's repulsive how raping women gets celebrated. How everything women do is invalidated, even if they might have really earned it. How members over there proudly announce how they ruined women's lives. Are you really surprised, though? It's a reaction to feminism, specifically to radical feminism/intersectional feminism. While MGTOW may never take off by itsel…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 02:22 PM
7

Be serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 02:08 PM
9

Women in the U.S. earn on average 81.1 percent of what men make. I stopped reading that article there.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 02:06 PM
13

There's no such rule. Objectively, men have contributed by orders of magnitude more than women have in every possible domain. Also, why are societies where women are 100% equal or dominant entirely primitive, living like 100,000 years ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 02:04 PM
2

I don't put much stock in Marxist theories since many of those theories have been debunked since the 1850s when Marx wrote most of them. For instance, while women had a bit more status among Cro-Magnon tribes, they were still placed in gender roles because it gave them an evolutionary advantage over Neanderthals. It was simply more efficient to have gender roles. It's why societies where women have more status equivalent to males are so primitive. They are simply inefficient. https://news.nation…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 01:38 PM
7

Unattractive men are not allowed to stick up for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 01:19 PM
3

tbh the women that are attracted to toxic guys are themselves pretty toxic and extremely shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/18 08:07 PM
47

Again, that's because they are low-hanging fruit and it is easier for those women to take out their anger on them rather than reflect on their own poor judgement or blame the actual asshole(s). For instance, many women would rather attack autists and other social awkward guys as being dangerous, despite the fact that the whole #metoo thing demonstrates that it isn't autists and socially awkward guys women ought to be careful around.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/18 07:16 PM
72

and yet it is the white I.T guy or the meek silent kid who befriends a woman gets the most abuse from feminists and are considered the most 'dangerous That's because they are low-hanging fruit and tend not to stick up for themselves. They get bullied.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/18 07:06 PM
1

Whatever floats your boat.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 07:38 PM
1

Now you are taking a hostile tone at criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 07:37 PM
1

The reality is, that it does have impact.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 07:36 PM
1

One goes with the other. It is unrealistic to expect men to be outgoing chatterboxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 05:59 PM
1

An introvert BY DEFINITION is shy, socially awkward.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 05:48 PM
1

I judge all ideologies on their merits. I am willing to entertain every last one of them, and if they are useless as a whole, I take from them the ideological idiosyncrasies that are useful. I will entertain feminism, Marxism, fascism, monarchism, liberalism so long as someone is also willing to hear me out and engage in discussion as opposed to shit slinging.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 04:56 PM
1

That covers a lot of men. I highly doubt most men are extroverts, or even attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 04:53 PM
3

You are right, in theory. The fact is that next to NO feminist is ever willing to calmly and rationally debate feminist ideology and why it is superior to other ideologies. More often than not, we get the stereotypical feminist with the foul temperament that simply dismisses every criticism with "go read a book" or "educate yourself", or "It's not my job to educate you". That shit is a cop-out. As for me, I am more than happy to engage in discussion and debate with feminists who are willing to d…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 04:47 PM
2

Yep. Just look at Google News.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 04:42 PM
1

They're related.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 04:40 PM
2

Regards, Antifa
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 04:16 PM
1

It's often called Post-Marxism. It is Marxist in its methodology, but diverges from orthodox Marxism with heavy reliance on Critical Theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 04:15 PM
3

A movement is judged more by the negatives than the positives. When many people hear the word "feminist", they think of an overly obese hairy woman with blue hair, tattoos and piercings, and a very foul temperament.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 04:12 PM
1

Ideally have both. But if I have to choose between love and procreation, I would choose procreation. The ones who focus on love don't populate the future generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 03:13 PM
2

Nothing wrong with holding women to different standards than men. Women are women, not men. DUH.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 02:48 PM
1

Correct. There is no legitimate reason for a woman, especially married, to have relations with other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 02:45 PM
1

A fat, corrupt, domineering mess?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 05:01 AM
1

Nope. What matters is that I am the one filling her with my DNA.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 05:01 AM
1

Because it is the physical cheating than can produce offspring. Emotion-fucking someone doesn't produce offspring that she can claim are his. I mean she can be emotionally in love with some other dude for all I fucking care, so long as I am the banging her.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 01:04 AM
1

Such things are for the good of society, and to control female sexuality, which favors anarchism.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 12:57 AM
1

They submit to their duties. They submit to an archetype of the fair, just, and virtuous man wearing the crown on his head.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 12:55 AM
1

So really you want the state to be your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 12:53 AM
0

No, it's not like transmissions at all. Women are women. Cars are cars.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 09:58 PM
7

1 in 2 married men are cucks. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2769593/HALF-women-fall-partner-standby-fancied-case-current-relationship-turns-sour.html
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 05:33 PM
3

Exactly. Cat calling is temporary inconvenience. Whereas paternity fraud is a lifetime deceit that involves the exchanges of time and money under false pretenses.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 05:32 PM
2

It shouldn't be a question of appropriate versus inappropriate. Keep that shit out of the workplace. Flirt and play grab-ass on your own time. Work is for work, not for romance.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/17 04:03 PM
1

Yeah ok, Freud.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 01:51 AM
1

I can see that you are good... at avoiding questions. But such questions (like demographic effects on economies and women) require a certain IQ threshold that you don't meet, so I'll leave you alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/17 07:01 PM
0

"revenge pony sandwich" looooool Where's the money going to come from to feed the economy if the population will be shrinking? Seriously, answer that. Is it going to come from the Magical Feminist Money-Queefing Machine? And if the economy is going to contract through deflation, what will happen to women and working outside the home? I can tell that I am touching on topics way too advanced for you here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/17 06:30 PM
2

So tell me, what's the logical outcome of collapsing birthrates, high divorces, and low marriage rates, topped off with increasing use of automation? Where's the money going to come from to pay for shit? The economy is going to contract. There simply won't be enough bodies to create wealth in the coming decades. What do you think is going to happen once the economy contracts and gets hit with deflation? How do you think that is going to affect women? Be serious now.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/17 06:19 PM
1

I do want a woman with a good job. In fact, mother/homemaker is the BEST job ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/17 05:22 PM
-1

It will come back. With the collapse in birth rates and increase in automation, what do you think will happen to the economy when the chickens come home to roost? The economy will contract, we'll hit deflationary spiral, tighten our belts, and we'll be back to our traditional roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/17 05:20 PM
2

I offer an actual understanding of Martin Heidegger's ontological philosophy of 'Being'. That shit is convoluted. Good luck finding another dude who understands 'Time and Being', hoe
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/17 02:27 PM
1

Gross old guys? You sound like a teenager. Pay attention in class, kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 03:41 PM
1

You're just getting the massive feminist butthurt at men being able to score younger women. Very few things drive post-wall feminists and their white knights more crazy than a guy who is in his 30s or 40s+ fucking some young 21 year old hotty.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 03:38 PM
8

It difficult to determine sex on here and the way it was stated sounded like someone who has been cucked. Like "My wife's son" loooooool
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 03:36 PM
1

What favors men is non-commitment. Want power over a woman? Don’t have oneitis. Don’t commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 12:46 PM
1

Fair enough, thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 05:14 AM
1

It wasn't convenience so much as it was necessity, and a necessity that was realized during the Neolithic period, both for the maintenance of agriculture and because you couldn't compete as a male otherwise. For most of human existence, the dominant socio-sexual structure was polygyny - an alpha male that had multiple wives. Such societies were rather violent, prone to create warlords and "might makes right" mentalities. It was bad for women, too, for reasons that should be obvious. Monogamy lev…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 04:11 AM
3

Exactly. It's like when children test their boundaries with their parents to see what they can get away with. If the parents let them get away with too much, they won't respect their parents. You're just qualifying the candidates based on rational criteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 03:55 AM
1

Banter is pretty much AMOGing. In a group of male friends, the best one at banter is usually the top dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 03:50 AM
5

That's not shit testing. You aren't prodding her to demonstrate dominance. Shit testing is specifically designed to test your ability to maintain composure, demonstrate leadership or dominant male qualities and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 03:48 AM
0

As far as I know, men don't shit test unless they are severely lacking in the testosterone department. We do compliance testing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 03:44 AM
1

You are right. Perfect monogamy is not our natural state. But then again, neither is anything else that we do or create. We have to ability to control our urges through will. Bonobos, not so much. Virtue versus Vice. We have the ability to be more than what our biology dictates. And we should be more than what our biology dictates. We come up with sciences, philosophies, mathematics, theologies and so on. I do however disagree that we are disorganized. We're precisely the opposite. Our minds cat…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 02:15 AM
2

You are wrong. Monogamy evolved out of pair bonding (that exists everywhere in the animal kingdom) and it was necessary in order for most men to be producers, otherwise they may cause trouble. It coincides with the Neolithic period, the spread of agriculture. This process is started when low-ranked males begin using an alternative strategy of female provisioning. At the end, except for the top-ranked individuals, males invest exclusively in provisioning females who have evolved very high fidelit…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/17 05:00 PM
2

Literally pages and pages of feminists defending and warming up to rap.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 01:17 PM
1

She wrote on Instagram: “Me being such an abled, white, cis body with its only nonconforming feature being a lil leg hair. Literally I’ve been getting rape threats in my DM inbox. I can’t even begin to imagine what it’s like to not possess all these privileges and try to exist in the world. Sending love and try to remember that not everybody has the same experiences being a person.” 3edgy5me I view this the same way I view blue/purple/green hair, tattoos, excessive piercings, etc. I view her as …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 01:16 PM
1

Sounds reasonable to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/17 12:59 AM
1

I don’t disagree with anything you have said. But I’m not arguing sexual dimorphism.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 10:43 PM
1

For science.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 10:42 PM
1

I don’t doubt that the data is good. But it is simulation data and an estimate, versus sex actual chromosome data. What explanation would you have for the massive dip 8000 years ago in Y-DNA diversity?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 10:42 PM
2

Maybe. But I don’t think those guys give a shit. Plus they “won” over the local men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 10:36 PM
1

By human default I mean that it is logical that women are more picky, considering they are the ones that decide natural selection - since they get pregnant. So if all women are picky, it logically follows that they would all be chasing the best men, which would lead to polygyny. As far as mate security, you are talking about pair bonding, which isn't necessarily the same thing as monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 08:36 PM
1

How are you going to get reproductive skew out of autosomes? There's no way of knowing which sex/gender those autosomes came from.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 08:33 PM
1

It's not my fantasy. I just used him as an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:56 PM
1

It's not balance when there is a rapidly growing population of incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:43 PM
2

Yeah, but those guys usually get shamed for it. Some of it is racist shaming, like "you couldn't get yourself a white girl" type stuff if she is Asian. The availability of foreign women just levels the playing field, but causes a huge problem for local men from where the foreign woman got imported from.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:36 PM
1

not a black pill incel, but I imagine anime and vidya would be high on the list
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:34 PM
1

no. go away
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:31 PM
2

Lots of men DO go for poorer women. Why do you think there is an abundance of Western men going out to get themselves an Eastern European or Asian woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:27 PM
1

Give him a shot and let him prove you wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:23 PM
2

There's no way that even comes close to explaining the massive bottleneck in Y-DNA around 8000 years ago. Not even male lineages dying out comes close to explaining that. It could only have been polygyny, as demonstrated in this paper.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:22 PM
1

You know too many fuckboys
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:14 PM
1

Here is a thought experiment: What would happen to society if polygyny made a comeback?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:06 PM
1

I'm fine with concept of one woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:06 PM
1

Did you try GEDMatch? Have you googled it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:05 PM
1

It really isn't. You only notice the top men. The rest have to make their presence known. And of the ones that make their presence known to you, only a very, VERY small minority will be acceptable to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 07:02 PM
3

I’m pretty sure that a guy like Genghis Khan, who had over 300 wives and is known as the greatest mass murderer in all of human history, didn’t have an issue with nagging. He’d have the bitch executed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:48 PM
2

Whether the woman has an official title or not doesn’t change what it is. You are getting sidetracked by a technicality
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:43 PM
1

The fact that she doesn’t have an official title like “wife” doesn’t change what it is
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:42 PM
1

He doesn’t need to promote the idea. Tinder already does that very well. The fact that a fuckbuddy doesn’t have an official title like husband/wife doesn’t change anything. It’s a sort of neo-polygyny
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:41 PM
1

Let's math this out. Most chicks at college are fucking the same frat boys over and over again. Maybe the hoes have Chad #1 and Chad#2 cocks on rotation, but it doesn't change that it isn't a 1 to 1 ratio. CHAD IS GETTING MORE PUSSY THAN STACY IS GETTING DICK.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:31 PM
2

Culture of course affects things. However, only women get pregnant. They are, therefore, more valuable to society than men. Sperm is cheap. Eggs are valuable, in high demand, and only available for a limited time. Therefore, outside of coercion, a woman will be the one to decide who gets to mate and who doesn't. She is therefore more picky than a man. It stands to reason that situations like polygyny will occur as women look for the top men and would rather be his #2 or even #17 than a beta male…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:27 PM
2

I'll just throw this debate into the mix: some feminists believe (and some men) that monogamy is oppressive, designed to limit women's sexuality. I agree that it was designed to do that, but that it is not oppressive, given the data and what we know about the Y chromosome. In other words, without monogamy, civilization is not possible, as society would never be stable enough to form civilization. Civilization is, above all else, about harmony (order) and perhaps equity (justice).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:18 PM
2

You are looking at the graph wrong. The SCALE of the left chart (men) is different from the right chart (women) The maximum for the chart on the left (men) is 150k The maximum for the chart on the right (women) is 500k
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:08 PM
5

Are they? They are over only in name. The fact is that the top men are running de facto harems. Take a university for example. Any university, really. So while we give lip service to monogamy, polygyny seems to have made a comeback.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:04 PM
2

The way we do things are different. I notice all women and subconsciously rate them and put them on a list from best to worst. Women, by contrast, notice only the best men. The rest don't exist until they somehow make their presence known.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:02 PM
1

Because it is, given the lack of Y chromosome diversity versus X chromosome diversity. Nothing else can explain that other than polygyny. Even some weird shit like Y-DNA recombination and deleterious genes doesn't explain that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:37 PM
1

It had to have been culturally enforced, otherwise things would revert to the human default of polygyny. That crazy dip must have been some event that took place - which is in the article I linked about a 17:1 ratio thanks to Neolithic farmers hogging all the pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:32 PM
1

I wasn't arguing that polygyny was good.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:30 PM
2

lol Genghis Khan had more people mass murdered per capita than other other ruler in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:27 PM
2

Nah. It's not that women aren't supposed to reach out otherwise they would to most guys. It's that women don't reach out either way unless she thinks the guy is hot. This seems to be a common theme throughout history.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:26 PM
2

You're reading it wrong. Female sender to least attractive male recipient: less than 40% Male send to least attractive female recipient: over 45%
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:24 PM
1

All men are ugly to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:19 PM
2

Huh? What are you talking about? https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/0*aWz0dYzuUR7PO3dP.png
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:15 PM
1

Look at the data again. It isn't 1:1. That is the ideal. But not what really happens, even in modern times. Although the imbalance has been greatly reduced thanks to monogamy. But it seems like some view monogamy as oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:14 PM
1

Monogamy is actually older than even Rome or Ancient Greece and seems to have coincided with the Yamnaya invasions of Asia and Europe, combined with permanent farming. After the Yamnaya invaded Europe from the Steppes, there was an explosion of Y-DNA diversity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:11 PM
1

No. It means that 76% of men have had children by 15-44 years old. The other 24% have children over the age of 44.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:09 PM
1

Genghis Khan had over 300 wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:05 PM
1

I wasn't implying that we need to stop doing it, but rather that we need to SAVE IT.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:04 PM
1

He looks ugly to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:04 PM
1

My response was that this data isn't saying what you think it is. It is a demographic breakdown of all the people that HAVE HAD CHILDREN. It does not include all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:03 PM
1

You mean the part where guys go for the most attractive women first? Of course we do. We make a list and then go down the list, whereas women stick to the top guys and only make a few exceptions. The rest are ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:02 PM
1

It's not so much that they lie, it's just the hamster wheel spinning. In their minds, they are never wrong. They are especially never shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 04:33 PM
2

It sounds rather noble of them, except for the fact that "trash" is most of the male population. Suddenly it doesn't sound so noble.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 04:09 PM
1

Fun fact: women would rather commit suicide than to marry below their standards. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3513544/Bridesmaid-31-hanged-struggling-cope-seeing-friends-married-failed-partner.html http://metro.co.uk/2015/02/11/woman-commits-suicide-because-she-was-unmarried-and-had-no-children-by-30-5058139/ https://www.naij.com/16339.html Just a few examples
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 04:01 PM
-1

get lost shitposter
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:47 PM
0

As opposed to hoes that feel entitled to be only surrounded by Chads.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:47 PM
1

Nah, just pretending they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:46 PM
0

She is perfectly average. Most posters in that thread agree. She's average. Men have standards in line with normal distribution. Women do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:45 PM
3

All men are ugly, which is why we have an inaccurate gauge of value to the opposite sex. Men do not have the aesthetically pleasing value that women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:42 PM
2

Counter-argument: nope Counter-sources: nope Dismissed status: yup
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:39 PM
5

Again with the source, which is all you have posted here in this thread. That is CLASSIC SHITPOSTING. And my worldview isn't based on that, but a combination of that and OTHER LINKS I POSTED in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:15 PM
2

My argument is that you need to actually present an argument rather than bitching about sources. Present an argument or fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:12 PM
1

Attacking the sources is not an argument. Present an argument or go away
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:10 PM
2

That's a logical fallacy. There's nothing wrong with the data they collected. You're attacking the source rather than what the source is saying. Look at the other sources I have posted in this thread. Here is another one. “I think the 80/20 principle is the key to understanding the situation we find ourselves in—one in which casual sex is the cultural norm, despite the fact that most people would actually prefer something quite different,” Walsh told me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:08 PM
4

First, let's start with an experiment in online dating, and a chart of women's preferences, found here. Look at how the women's preferences curve looks versus the men's preferences curve. Men have a bell-shaped curve, which is normal distribution. Most data is in the center. Thus, an average woman is a 5-6/10. But for women, an average man is an 8-9/10. So a 5-6/10 male is UNATTRACTIVE. In mathematics, this is called the Pareto Principle - the 80/20 rule. Interestingly, the rule of this distribu…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:06 PM
3

Given women's standards, you are by definition NOT a regular dude, since women find most men to be unattractive. If you are not invisible to women, you are not a regular dude. Most men also do not produce offspring. The global average ratio for women reproducing to men reproducing is 5:1.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:01 PM
1

To be honest, I think incels/kneckbeards over time will go full Genghis Khan and simply take what they want when there is such a lopsided imbalance in social status, economics, and most importantly, the sexual market.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:58 PM
1

Of course feminism is cancer. It is anti-civilization. You have to see feminism for what it is - the total deregulation of the sexual market. If you understand mathematics, you will know this will result in Pareto Efficiency, i.e. the 80/20 rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:53 PM
1

The benefit of patriarchy was that all men were kept happy. Now with inceldom growing into alarming levels, you will see more guys like Elliot Rodger shooting shit up. I have a feeling this isn't anything new, but rather something our ancestors thousands of years ago already went through. Here is a historical group of incels that went invading all over the place. Vikings are another good example of what happens when men don't get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:50 PM
1

You are correct. In a completely unregulated sexual market, women will be the determiners of who gets some and who doesn't, and their standards are brutal. It's like how any capitalist system works that lacks any regulation. Feminism is a complete deregulation of the sexual market.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:45 PM
2

Average looking men get ignored by average looking women. This is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:42 PM
1

No. 50% of women are seen as average. Male preferences follow a bell-shaped curve (so most data in concentrated in the center). Women's preferences follow what looks like a reverse-quadratic curve (and thus far more harsh).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:41 PM
2

Women's standards in a "free" dating market are far more harsh than those of men. And the 80/20 rule is called the Pareto Principle.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:39 PM
1

No. Patriarchy leveled the playing field by making mating more equitable. In other words, women, even ugly ones, weren't chasing Chad. Perfect example: India. Men and women get spouses "assigned" to them based on their station. Women of wealth get men of wealth. Women of poverty get men of poverty. Harmony and balance are maintained. Oh, and by the way, how ugly or attractive a guy is depends more on the Mother, not the Father. So an attractive guy can make an unattractive son.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:36 PM
1

Even scientists are aware of how massive your gash is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 01:33 PM
0

Again, I will use the Saudi princes example. They're hideous fuckers and yet they have harems of sex slaves.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:10 PM
1

Just look at some of the princes of Saudi Arabia. They're ugly fuckers. Yet they have a different hoe for each hour of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:06 PM
0

Why would they need plastic surgery when they can buy any hoe they want?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:03 PM
1

Of course it will bring attraction. And even if it doesn't, you can always buy attraction. Everyone has a price. More importantly, it can also buy harems.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:01 PM
1

Money can buy anything. It can buy politicians, entire governments, armies, women, get people you don't like erased, put you above the law ... really anything assuming you have enough of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:53 PM
1

No (¬‿¬)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:44 PM
2

No /╲/\╭( ͡° ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° ͡°)╮/\╱\
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:21 PM
1

Of course they will, and it is no different than a dildo.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:12 PM
1

Of course it stretches. Duh. Everyone knows that. Just like yours stretches from gaping chasm to bottomless abyss.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:11 PM
1

I'm so threatened by him saying women are threatened by sexbots that I'm going to correct him! How dare he! - lerellen
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:07 PM
0

/r/FatLogic
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:05 PM
0

Why is there always some hamplanet that refers to herself as 'goddess'? I guess gravitational anomalies have that right.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:00 PM
1

Sure, why not if your gash is that cavernous. Might as well get three with 17 inch cocks. Or better yet, get a robo-elephant for maximum effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:37 PM
3

The whole "entitled" meme is getting a bit out of hand. One is not "entitled" for feeling a perfectly natural desire for human affection, and expressing frustration at the lack of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:36 PM
2

I'm not going to argue with you about sources, but the bottom line is: are you down with sexbots or no? I'm not going to strawman your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:01 PM
1

I've posted links ITT
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:58 PM
3

It would have to be conscious. How else would you reinforce something on such a grand scale? Someone would have to organize it. In order for something to be systemic, it needs to be consciously enforced, through law, economics, politics, culture, ethics, etc. The shit doesn't just happen by voodoo magic
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:57 PM
2

Another example. Feminist theorists have expanded the definition of patriarchal society to describe a systemic bias against women. In order for it to be systemic, it would need to be a conspiracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:52 PM
3

The claim is right here. The idea is that it is systematic
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:49 PM
2

There's no argument to listen to. People aren't just going to believe at face value that is a concerted conspiracy by one sex to oppress the other sex. Literally that is just a variant of the Free Masons rule the world! or The Illuminati rule world! Just replace men with [insert evil elite power group here]
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:35 PM
6

Here, from your OP Just how big of a victim complex does one need Even funnier is that you accuse SJWs of being easily triggered although all it takes to trigger all of you is one 13 year old chick that complains that the portrayal of women in video games is often sexist You started off with typical feminist shaming tactics and didn't actually present an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:33 PM
2

Not at all. I'd consider their arguments if they actually made any. But instead they resort to buzzwords in an attempt to browbeat and shame their opposition into submission. To actually believe that men are conspiring to oppress women is akin to Illuminati tinfoil hattery.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:30 PM
2

spengbab
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:27 PM
5

lrn2google https://www.google.com/search?q=sexbots+feminism&client=opera&hs=BLW&tbm=nws&ei=cSfVWeDvApCDjwS4wYvoCg&start=0&sa=N&biw=1723&bih=912&dpr=1
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:26 PM
3

Here is one Shit ton of others... https://www.google.com/search?q=sexbots+feminism&client=opera&hs=BLW&tbm=nws&ei=cSfVWeDvApCDjwS4wYvoCg&start=0&sa=N&biw=1723&bih=912&dpr=1
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:26 PM
1

lol that's brilliant! I guess I should start saving my jizz from fapping since that'll be heavier for MORE GAINZ!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:58 PM
5

Rape CultureTM , like The PatriarchyTM are catch-all phrases meaning anything feminists don't like; for example, anything that doesn't require a woman to be present. Which is why sexbots and vagina-like sex toys for men are called RAPE CULTURETM because feminists don't like them. They don't like them because it doesn't force men to be dependent upon a woman somehow
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:57 PM
1

From what I gather, for some women, hygiene only matters when she tries to show you off to her friends. Some women have used panties and tampons lying around...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:52 PM
1

Do I have to have a nice car? Mine is multicolored and smells like vomit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:49 PM
3

"RAAAAAPE CULTURETM is not an opinion. It is paranoid schizophrenia is not an opinion. It is paranoid schizophrenia." is paranoid schizophrenia
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:42 PM
3

RAAAAAPE CULTURETM is not an opinion. It is paranoid schizophrenia
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:30 PM
2

Sounds like an oil change at Midas.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:22 PM
2

You mean kidnapping?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:21 PM
5

To summarize: Chicks with dildos - no big deal! Don't be so insecure! Guys with sex toys - OMG RAAAAAAPE CULTURE!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:20 PM
18

It's interesting because I saw several nuclear-grade public meltdowns over sexbots recently in the news. From women. At least those guys are feeling threatened by humans, whereas women will feel threatened by inanimate objects.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:39 PM
-1

And women "love" men by proxy cause of their cunts. Men are essentially worker drones, ATMs, and dildos.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:34 PM
0

We like women for their holes, not for their personalities. If we wanted personality, we'll hang out with our male friends. Just like men are essentially dildos and worker drones, and not human to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:32 PM
1

But how will other males know that you marked your territory on a woman if you don't leave your stank on her?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:22 PM
1

Bicycle. Sure sure. Heard that one before ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:18 PM
1

Our fluids and scents are very dear to us and have sentimental value.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:13 PM
1

Jesus, man. You must be a Quantum Physicist with all these brilliant ideas. And here I was about to use some of my allowance mom gives me that I usually spend on chicken tenders. YOU THE MAN!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:55 PM
1

That's..... BRILLIANT! I need to spec/price this out....
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:52 PM
1

That's the advantage of skid marks. It's marking your territory and you know they are yours. Kinda like a signature.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:49 PM
1

You may laugh but that's actually how they do it in Greece. TP ruins their sewers so they throw it into the bin. Implying I wasn't being serious. WTF m8? Don't you have a sink nearby? Sink? In my bedroom? I just can't be bothered to get up to go to the boys room while I'm in the middle of gaming. Hence I save empty milk jugs to piss in. And since they are my fluids, they have sentimental value to me, so I just save 'em.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:47 PM
0

I'm not sure why they have to be hotter than every other biznitch. It's not like it's a competition since guys will fuck anything and we have all kinds of fetishes covering every kind of woman: fat - great! Hairy - great! Femdom - great! Ugly - brownbag it! Must be that wimminz are naturally homosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:43 PM
1

Makes sense. Do you also share underwear?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:37 PM
2

Wait.... do they use your deoderant? Is that how it gets misplaced? That's kinda hot tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:33 PM
2

Hmmm. That explains why she no longer tries to hit me with the tennis racket whenever I grope her.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:31 PM
1

Showering is too much of a chore. Deoderant seems to save me the trouble. Plus I heard chicks dig man-smell
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:29 PM
1

My sister suggested that the scent of the immediate vicinity of my room bears stark resemblance to a male urinal in a run-down strip joint. Don't ask me how she knows that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:25 PM
3

Seriously. Why do women ruin everything? Our hobbies are important to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:22 PM
2

Hmmm. Good suggestion. I'm taking notes. Does that imply that I don't have to sacrifice my collection of piss jugs?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:22 PM
2

Old School, bitches!!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 02:53 PM
1

Women just don't appreciate the NEET life the way they should, and of course, because they are jelly of anime waifus.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 02:34 PM
2

I dunno. My sister is pretty hot. And to as the icing on the cake, she no longer gets upset when I walk in on her showering to take a dump. She even flashes me. Is she flirting? pls help
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 02:05 PM
2

Thanks for the backup, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 02:04 PM
1

While I guy can fake virginity, a woman really can't. Either the hymen is intact or it is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 02:02 PM
1

That's a very one-dimensional world view. You are saying that it is impossible for women (or even men) to remain chaste. Are you suggesting nuns have sex in secret? Or perhaps Buddhist monks have sex in secret? That chastity for its own sake is impossible?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 01:34 AM
1

Funny how rebellion works
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 01:00 AM
1

some women have always slutted it up. The majority of women simply go with society’s expectations. Since there is no expectation to remain chaste, they don’t. If that expectation made a comeback, they would go with that. History isn’t linear and newer generations rebel. If there is no expectation of chastity and it is in fact derided, they will rebel with chastity. “Screw you mom and dad. I’m not slutting it up” And that will be her middle finger to you
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 11:54 PM
1

Sure you can. You can change the dynamics of the market much the same way sexual liberation changed the dynamics. If the market is saturated with fuckboys, the market will respond accordingly. It’s already happening. Millennials and especially Gen Z are having less sex than their predecessors. So you can say that chastity is slowly making a comeback.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 11:41 PM
1

Forbidding eating shrimp and sending women to rag it out in the shed are OT rules that were overridden in the NT with a new covenant. But I digress. If you believe that will make you happy, then cool. But alternatives exist and they work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 11:23 PM
1

Whether it is their fault or not is not relevant. Certain conditions in society must exist in order for them to exist. If their marriages are arranged, they don’t need to spend time and effort looking, using whatever goofy strategy they think of.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 11:21 PM
1

If that’s what you prefer regardless of other potential benefits of another system, then good on you. But there are alternatives. It’s just silly to imply that no one had good sex until the invention of the CC. Shit even the Bible commanded married couples to have good sex and try all kinds of stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 10:45 PM
1

Because the conditions required for these people to exist won’t be available. If everyone is paired up someone of a status appropriate to their own, there would be no need to be a nice guy or fuckboy
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 10:41 PM
1

Cool story bro 👍🏻
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 10:39 PM
3

3edgy5me
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 10:25 PM
1

Then we’ll try different things until it doesn’t suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 10:24 PM
6

Maybe they like to keep their dignity. Keep trying to fathom
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:58 PM
1

Pretty good. Keep going and maybe one day you’ll do better than the brothers Grimm
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:21 PM
1

Can you please stop flirting now? I’m not interested
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:13 PM
1

Aren’t fairy tales just grand?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:09 PM
1

You're so into my sex life that you made several posts about it, obviously flirting. Sorry, babe. But I'm just not feeling the chemistry ;_;
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:46 PM
2

Wow. My OP was so good that it has a spin-off series. Thanks m8
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:43 PM
1

Does Snow White fuck all the dwarves too? And I bet Cinderella is into some horse action. Definitely better material to read to kids for a bed time story than the old boring versions amirite?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:38 PM
1

#WINNING
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:36 PM
2

I appreciate your keen interest in my sex life, to the point of flirtation at this stage. But no, really, I'm good.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:35 PM
1

I think making a reverse fairy tale, like Sleep Beauty sucking hundreds of dicks plus a few bukkake sessions for her new facial moisturizer before prince charming kisses her (she gets the dicks and the Chad in the end!) would just make the story more charming.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:29 PM
1

I appreciate your concern about my sex life, but I've got it covered.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:27 PM
1

So JezebeltheQueen that unironically uses "wymyn" is a humanist? Something doesn't add up there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:22 PM
1

Meaning, they'll get settled down by an arranged marriage, in theory
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:20 PM
1

Still doesn't have Hungary or the Czech Republic beat in pornstars per capita
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:19 PM
0

For starters, it's your unironic use of "wymyn", the belief that people should just do whatever they want - especially sexually, the fact that you got defensive about being called an anarcho-kiddie, and you being confounded by my like of structure. What kind of anarchist are you? Probably an Anarcha-Feminist, since you don't strike me as a Max Stirner egoist type.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:17 PM
1

That's one goofy translation
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:14 PM
1

Are you denying that you are an anarchist?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:12 PM
1

Besides, it's really the Illuminati and their Reptillian overlords that run the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:09 PM
1

I’m heartbroken
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:07 PM
1

It isn’t. What you call “Patriarchy” is what mental health professionals call “paranoid schizophrenia”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:06 PM
2

False dilemma fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:05 PM
1

Nah. They’ll mostly go away once they’re settled down
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:05 PM
1

You brought up your anarcho-kiddie shit, not me
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:04 PM
1

Do women have agency? I wonder. They come up with crazy conspiracy theories like “The Patriarchy” to serve as the devil for everything that goes wrong in their lives
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:03 PM
1

If all you do is fuck and eat, you aren’t going to solve the mysteries of the universe. Not from that mud hut of yours
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:00 PM
0

That’s anarcho-kiddie crap. The most you’d get out of a society based on that is some primitive shot lit hole
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:56 PM
1

Cool conspiracy theory. But needs work to be on par with Flat Earth Society. They make their bullshit sound believable
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:54 PM
1

HAAAAHAHAHAHAHA
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:52 PM
2

I like the idea of commitment. It’s the basis for civilization
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:52 PM
1

I don’t technically care
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:47 PM
1

To a mommas boy
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:46 PM
2

Funny, a lot of guys feel the same exact way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:45 PM
1

I ain’t the one using SpongeBob grade fart jokes
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:44 PM
2

So they can avoid all the fuckboys and Nice Guys(TM)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:43 PM
1

Neat. I haven’t used that joke since 2nd grade. Thanks for bringing back memories 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:40 PM
1

If you feel that you must, go right ahead. You have my permission.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:33 PM
2

I know some of the biggest sluts from HS and college and most of them are either about to get married or are already married with a kid. I bet this just burns up a lot of men. She got to ride as much dick as she wanted to and still got a guy to marry in the end. While you sat crying in your room whining about why no woman wanted to touch your pee pee Feminist fairy tales
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:32 PM
1

only to weak mamas boys
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:31 PM
1

So everyone before 1960s sexual liberation hated sex? Holy shit! How did people even have children?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:31 PM
1

But yet Mickey Mouse is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:28 PM
1

Nah. I'm just having difficulty building up the requisite amount of care it would take to bother with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:44 PM
1

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:41 PM
1

Again, totally awesome. And again, not relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:40 PM
1

Sure, just like riding a bicycle can break your hymen XD Is there seriously a sucker that believes that these days?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:37 PM
1

You misunderstand. There is a direct relationship between riding the CC and divorce rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:35 PM
1

Well someone must be fucking. Their fertility numbers aren't as bad as Germany's
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:32 PM
1

It's another male revenge fantasy Cool theory but that's wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:31 PM
1

Animation is drawing lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:31 PM
2

What are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:28 PM
1

Marble is a legit artform. But drawing shit isn't. I wish someone would have told Leonardo Da Vinci that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:25 PM
2

I dunno, the butthurt brigade in this thread seem convinced that I am an incel just for asking the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:23 PM
1

Why? Because you said so?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:22 PM
1

Your first link is a dud. And in India, at least, no one is forced into a marriage. The people involved have a choice to decline a marriage offer.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:22 PM
1

If I only knew what you were babbling about...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:19 PM
1

Now my panties are totally soaked
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:18 PM
0

Sure, why not? My parents aren't retards. I trust their judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:17 PM
1

Awesome. Post copy of marriage certificate after it happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:47 PM
1

OK. And? Are you waiting for a round of applause or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:46 PM
1

Whoa! My panties are moist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:45 PM
1

Irrelevant non sequitur. I don't need to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:45 PM
1

Who said only women should remain virgins? Ultimately, YOU are the ones with the power to yes or no, aren't you? Arranged marriages also take the headache (and heartache) out of spending needless effort to find "the one". Your parents give you candidates and you pick the one the like the most and then get married. Shouldn't be a problem unless you think your own parents are retarded and lack proper judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:43 PM
1

Nah. They're doing fine. And the debt that they owe is debt to themselves, unlike American debt.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:40 PM
1

How so? Ancient women didn't get butthurt over statues to Athena. It's the same idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:38 PM
1

A subreddit is fact representative of all that is ever true in life /s
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:37 PM
1

Yes honey, I-I'm just waiting for the right moment. Please just shut the fuck up and stop nagging me lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:36 PM
1

That's a growing problem across the West as well. It's not unique to Japan. Germany has an ever worse fertility rate of births per woman than Japan does.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:34 PM
1

degree in philosophy Please tell me you are kidding because my sides are about to enter orbit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:33 PM
1

That glue you are sniffing, which brand is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:32 PM
1

Yeah let's go with wild, highly unlikely hypotheticals
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:31 PM
2

Boring
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:30 PM
1

"Willing to date" =/= "will only date" or even "prefers." You're speculating. That question wasn't asked. A) sexual compatibility is obviously important for A MARRIAGE to work if you want to have an awesome sex life. B) if you wait until you are married you are running the risk of not knowing whether the two of you are actually sexually compatible before you are legally married. Obviously. You have no sexual experience. He has no sexual experience. Therefore you are both equal and compatible. Es…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:29 PM
1

Vietnam seems to be doing better since they dropped Maoism.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:24 PM
1

I don't get it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:23 PM
1

She fell for that ol' line.... lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:21 PM
2

That's right. And I'm not changing my mind
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:21 PM
1

So you can only "be a man" if you aggressively pursue every hoe possible? Isn't that just a fuckboy?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:20 PM
1

Totally far out, dude. That's a bit irrelevant since we are talking about 2017 and not 1970.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:19 PM
1

Because it is cartoons and not real people.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:18 PM
1

Oh boy. Here comes the "I just so happen to conveniently have a degree in this topic" redditor.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:18 PM
1

Go date some men in America and get back to me on how many high quality men are going to wait until marriage. I'll pass. But seriously, 67% of men are willing to date virgins. That's a super-majority. The ones that aren't just want to fuck. are you kidding with this? No. You are both inexperienced. Completely equal. Thus they are completely sexually compatible. Don't pretend like you "knew what you wanted" before you ever took your first dick. Damn skippy Yeah, having privates that resemble Arby…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:17 PM
1

Totally awesome dude. Japan is also smaller than California, has less access to natural resources, has less people, is surrounded by hostile nations, yet still manages to pull third out of its ass somehow, easily comparable to the US. They must be doing something right.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:13 PM
1

What does the word "rationalize" mean to you? Here, I'll give you a perfect example of rationalization.... And infact he will be proposing soon, he's just waiting for the right moment lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:11 PM
1

Uh... China? Taiwan? South Korea?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:10 PM
0

BBC documentaries are nothing but narrative, like most other documentaries. It involves cherry picking interviewees that fit the narrative while discarding most of the ones that don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:09 PM
1

Of course sex has health benefits. No one argued that it doesn't. But why can't a young person, perhaps early 20s, who is already pretty damned healthy, get married and then have all the sex they want? And I ignored your other crap because it was bullshit not worth responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:08 PM
1

Who are you? Are you someone important?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:07 PM
2

BBC is bullshit with cherry picked interviews to fit a narrative. I think I'll stick to my sources and my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:06 PM
1

Were you on an army base? In that case, yeah, it would be so soooooooooooooooo different
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:05 PM
1

It is ludicrous? Man, how did humanity survive before women were sexually liberated?? Oh, I almost forgot that the universe started in the 60s and in the United States. And who gives a shit if you are sexually compatible? Sexual compatibility is AUTOMATIC if neither one of you has experience. Duh. And I'm sure you could do better than 800.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:42 PM
1

Says some random guy on the internet...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:40 PM
0

It certainly holds it more sacred than the US and the rest of the Anglosphere does, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:39 PM
0

Of course you are going to rationalize it as such, since you don't know any better. And he's your SO, not your husband. They come and go. Hell, in spouses these days come and go. Everyone is expendable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:38 PM
1

Says some random person on the internet.....
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:35 PM
0

You frame everything as: religious whackjob, obsessed, weird Just by you using those dismissive terms PROVES that you can't imagine an existence other than the one you currently live. The concept of not taking 800 random cocks before settling down confounds you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:35 PM
1

You're also talking about a massive nation with shit tons of resources and over 300 million people, whereas Japan is smaller than California yet Japan is competitive with the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:33 PM
-4

Women don't consciously choose to sleep around loads You mean women don't have agency and thus no responsibility? Or are they just on auto-fuck mode?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:32 PM
-1

You mean you think you do. At least that is what you are rationalizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:23 PM
1

It's funny that you feel threatened by the topic. I wonder why?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:22 PM
2

Does it involve a group of dirty old Japanese guys, a Japanese girl, a bath tub, and poop?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:20 PM
1

On what metric(s) are you basing this "doing pretty well" on? The Stock Market?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:12 PM
0

What women would gain by not fucking around is not being valued on their ability to make dicks hards - in other words, being valued on something other than a moist hole to put it in.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:12 PM
3

Your very simplistic answer demonstrates that you cannot fathom another mode of existence other than the CC.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:10 PM
0

Given your complete strawman of an answer, you have demonstrated precisely what I was talking about: you cannot fathom another mode of existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:07 PM
1

Yet they are doing pretty well, easily comparable to the US, which has greater access to resources and human labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:05 PM
1

Hentai doesn't involve real people
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:03 PM
1

Every culture has its hoes. Just some have them more than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:02 PM
2

I posed a question. You seem to be the one caring about MY sex life. I appreciate your interest, but I'm not into you. You're kinda boring and one-dimensional. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:48 PM
1

That's K-Pop. J-Pop is less degenerate. Objectifying images of people is not objectifying a person, since it is already an object. The Western world did this, too, like with Virgin Mary, fictional heroines, and early goddesses like Athena, who was a virgin warrior-woman and would kill any male looking upon her naked body. It's an ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:47 PM
1

The N count and divorce are correlated
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:43 PM
1

Nothing to project. I'm not le stronk independent sexually liberated womyn
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:42 PM
0

What makes you so sure? It's not like history is linear.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:42 PM
2

Of course culture matters. But culture can and does change. Before the culture was monogamy and purity were valued as virtues. Now they are not, and viewed as oppression. Just as easily that it changed from one to the other, it can change back.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:21 PM
2

because le stronk independent sexually liberated wymyn maymay
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:19 PM
0

Try thinking with your other head. Not everything is MUH DIK
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:19 PM
1

Sure, they marry non-virgins every day and enjoy the extremely high divorce rate that comes with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:18 PM
2

Here is the reason: Japan and Korea and really, most places on earth, hold sex to be more sacred than the West does. Not having to worry about fucking around only helps protect women from objectification and having their worth based on sexual prowess. It goes for men, too. You can drop nukes on a country and it does less damage than sexual anarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:15 PM
2

Why are you so angry over a post? You need to chill the fuck out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:13 PM
1

To be honest, I like Japanese movies more than Hollywood garbage. Even Korean shows are good, too. And you are spot-on. Sex is given a more sacred position in these societies. And if anything, protects women (and men) against objectification. This prevents your value being based solely on sexual prowess.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:12 PM
3

I'm not here to score or make friends. I'm here to debate and discuss, like the sub title states. Maybe you are used to something else, like Reddit dweebs flirting with you or some shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:03 PM
1

No idea what you are talking about. Any links?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:59 PM
1

What's that got to do the comment you are replying to?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:57 PM
1

Outright failure rate in the US, you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:57 PM
3

Sure. Every hamplanet in 'Murrica thinks they are a queen.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:55 PM
1

That would be awesome if it were even talking about the same article and same stats, but it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:52 PM
1

Been fun, but you're gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:51 PM
3

As if those women couldn't get dick from other sources if that were the case? They're a wealthy nation on par with the US and Europe. They could just as easily fuck more aggressive foreigners. But they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:50 PM
1

Another very good response. Thank you. This provides a lot of insight. I think Japanese relationships, as awkward as they appear, seem more fulfilling, without the pressure to "put out". They focus more on developing as a couple, with sex stemming from that development rather than forced because of a meme.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:49 PM
5

You aren't worth the effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:44 PM
2

It's hilarious that you cannot even fathom any other mode of existence except the one you become accustomed to. Good argument against feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:42 PM
-1

"Everybody who tries to argue with me that demonstrated being butthurt and defensive is actually butthurt and defensive" -NietzscheanStoic
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:39 PM
1

So women have no agency are completely defined by what men want? Good argument against feminism. And what man would go for a virgin? Try 67%. The ones that won't are looking for some easy pussy that they won't need to commit to. You limit your own choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:37 PM
0

Akihabara is heaven
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:33 PM
1

Sure sure. I'm not the one that started raging as soon as someone asked a question that hit a bit too close to home. So chill out, or get blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:32 PM
0

I've been to Japan. It isn't THAT much different. Has many familiar elements.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:31 PM
1

I wonder if unicorns in Alpha Centauri exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:29 PM
2

The benefit is that they don't get to be lonely cat ladies when they are post-wall and their pool of available men are dwindling. And from all kinds of stats, women are unhappier now than at any other point in history since statisticians have been tracking women's happiness. By contrast, arranged marriages in India are very successful. It's just interesting that women here will give a hostile response to this question, as if no other mode of existence is possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:29 PM
6

I'm not your personal entertainer.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:24 PM
5

Why are our incels so fucking whiny about it lol someone is a bit defensive about their extensive CC experience
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:23 PM
1

Do try to leave your hometown sometime. There's a world beyond it, amazingly enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:21 PM
1

Wow. One of the only thoughtful answers here. Thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:20 PM
2

Whoa. That's some hardcore butthurt there. Take it easy before you have a complete meltdown lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:19 PM
1

How many times have you actually been to Japan? I've been there. They aren't THAT foreign. Their society has many familiar elements common to Western societies in addition to elements that seem foreign to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:14 PM
1

They get arranged marriages. So long as they stay within that framework, they're fine. They're guaranteed a hoe appropriate to their status.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:42 PM
1

To be honest, it is. Civilization can't exist without it. Otherwise we'll exist in a primitive society - the feminist ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:40 PM
0

Huh? When was marriage 'sexless unless it's to conceive a child'? That's a myth. Even the Bible tells married couples to fuck and enjoy it. 1 Corinthians 7:1-40 Now concerning the matters about which you wrote: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband. The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. For the wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:29 PM
2

The reason is because she wasn't asking for commitment, given her age.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:22 PM
1

If you want to save monogamy, stop accepting women that have ridden the cock carousel. All this is doing is allowing Chad to have de facto harems.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:17 PM
3

I would recommend divorce rape after he impregnates you a couple of times, so that way you can use the children as a weapon and use the BUT THINK OF THE CHILDREN line in court. Judges are suckers for that line.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:14 PM
2

Honestly I would rather they just charge money for the sex. That way, after I bust a nut, the contract is over and she can fuck off. Instead, women have a better plan: drain his lifeforce like a vampire.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:13 PM
2

For housework, I just toss on some headphones with some aggressive music to get the blood pumping so I don't pass out from boredom.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 07:11 PM
3

Because a woman can pay another guy to clean or do yard work or to fix things and not have to fuck him. I'm sure many women would rather hire other women to clean their houses for them and not men. The result isn't the same. The result is her thinking that you are fucking lazy. You won't survive on personality alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 04:05 PM
1

Ideally. But in the real world you always have to bring value to the table. If you are just busy being you and nothing else, you are nothing more than a human dildo and shoulder to cry on. Any guy can do that. It's like how it is in the real world job market. If you don't add value to your position, you'll get cut eventually and replaced by someone who can do the same thing cheaper.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 03:44 PM
2

Guys (and girls) should do whatever the fuck they want with their expendable income rolls yes Yeah, if they want to make themselves disposeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 02:48 PM
3

Men also of course make themselves replaceable by not doing the physical labor outside of the house, like landscaping, mowing the lawn, fixing things, etc and paying others to do it. Guys should save the money and do the physical labor themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 02:32 PM
1

Then yes. There's always something to maintain either inside the house or the exterior. The siding isn't going to powerwash itself, nor will the deck sand and paint itself. In addition, I own a few acres of land that needs to be maintained year round. I find the physical labor to be calming and therapeutic. It's good cardio and weight-lifting, so no gym membership required. I don't want to pay others thousands of dollars to do these things when I can do them myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 02:29 PM
2

Does working outside (mowing lawn, gardening, shoveling snow, cleaning up leaves, landscaping, etc.) or fixing shit count as housework?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 01:40 PM
2

Her body language says it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 01:20 PM
1

Return of Kings
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 01:18 PM
3

Don't confuse "lack of sociosexual literacy" with not giving a fuck The difference between the two is the amount of attractiveness. Women love the latter. The only thing that makes you the former is you aren't good looking enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 01:18 PM
1

Yes. It is blue pill and full of crypto-feminists. Don't get me wrong. TRP is great for self-improvement. But outside of that, TRP is nothing but pussy worship. They aren't interested in fixing a broken culture. They think they can fuck their way into enlightenment. At least ROK is self-aware and realizes the irony there, that PUA culture only perpetuates the degeneracy, and even attempts to piece together a working political philosophy dealing with society as a whole and how to fix it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:51 PM
2

Whoa! That totally convinced me! Because you said so!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:38 PM
1

The Y instability in that article refers to deleterious genes in 15-25% of infertile men, not of all men. Something like that would not explain a bottleneck so massive that it created a 17:1 ratio of women reproducing to men reproducing. And it makes sense that early farmers were shorter and got sick more often. They created the first permanent settlements. Naturally disease will go around more easily than when you are mobile and didn't stay somewhere for too long like H-G did. And because they …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 05:23 PM
6

It's not equivalent. Female standards, at least in the US, exclude large portions of the male population as it is (around 80% are automatically eliminated from the possibilities), while male standards follow a normal bell-shaped curve (majority of women are possibilities). It's one thing to have such standards when you are 20 and in your prime. It's entirely delusional to have such restrictive standards at 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 05:08 PM
1

Depending on where you are in the male hierarchy, you show respect accordingly otherwise it is interpreted as disrespect and a challenge to fight. When men deal with each other, there are many understood things. If you show loyalty to a guy friend, he will in kind show loyalty to you. If he does not, he is a piece of shit without honor or respect. This is not a written rule, but an understood one. The mistake the Nice Guy makes is believing that women think the same way men do. But it is underst…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 05:04 PM
1

For your entire reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:55 PM
1

Awesome. Cite your sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:45 PM
2

This is something women need to think about BEFORE going into careerism. They need to drop the stupid LE STRONK INDEPENDENT WYMYN feminist memes and realize that if you sacrifice marriage and family life early for careerism, your options are severely limited when you decide to come around to it. If a woman ever intends to marry and reproduce, she should do it earlier rather than later. Either sacrifice family or sacrifice career. Women CAN'T have it all. That's an obvious lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:45 PM
1

Source: your sphincter
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:41 PM
5

It's not that those lonely career women can't get a man. They can get multiple men quite easily, just by existing. The problem is her standards do not match reality: she is aging, guys don't give a shit about her "achievements" because it won't make their dicks any harder - but somehow she still expects alphas to be in her pussy like they were when she was in her 20s. Those guys are either taken or fucking someone much younger and more attractive. Bitch needs to get over herself and adjust her s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:03 PM
1

Yeah, bigots tend not to care about their bigotry
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 02:32 PM
5

No, I would be more intimidated by her massive cavernous cunt. I'd have to spend lots of money on large amounts of cave exploration gear.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 01:45 PM
1

A normalized bell-shaped curve is NOT "no standards". The majority of women will fall into the 4-6 range, while the two ends of the curve will be 1-3, and 7-10 respectively. Women have absurd standards with a curve resembling a reverse-quadratic expression. So it's not that they are "picky" but they are fucking delusional, with even ugly women believing they deserve a hot guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 01:25 PM
1

lol how far out of your hometown have you actually traveled?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 01:21 PM
1

I'll give her credit for her honesty, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:52 AM
2

I agree. But I guess it also depends on the initial product you have to work with. I guess the typical guy could bump himself up a few points and then work on social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:50 AM
2

And some men will argue that facial/physical attractiveness can be improved simply by changing hair styles, wardrobe, exercise, etc. Men in general lack the aesthetic attractiveness that women have. Women have features that are attractive to both sexes, like longer necks, more rounded faces, breasts, curves, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:38 AM
1

And Alex Jones will pay for your conspiracy theories, instead of you wasting everyone's time here with your shitposts and complaints about OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:27 AM
1

Attractiveness and social dominance are de facto the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:25 AM
1

Not all women lie about it. Some actually come clean, as I pointed out with that tech woman that fessed up about how she loathes autistic men being in the same corporate building as her. I'll wager that if women got a vote tomorrow on what to do with these guys, they'd all end up in a concentration camp so women could only be surrounded by attractive, sociable men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:56 AM
1

What women don't tell you is that you have to be attractive in order to be "that guy". If you aren't attractive and you try to be "that guy", you'll be accused of being creepy or rapey.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:47 AM
1

Of course they are saying that because they don't want to appear shallow. Two things I have learned over the years about women is that 1) read between the lines and 2) don't pay attention to what they say but observe what they do. It's common knowledge among experienced men that women give bad advice on romance to men, for example - either deliberately or unintentionally. We have nothing more to discuss as we will just go back and forth disagreeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:39 AM
6

Not nearly as hard as my dick got at your attempt at damage control and conspiracy theory pandering.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:35 AM
1

But I am not seeing a different opinion come from you. What you are saying is very similar to what she is saying about awkward beta males (people that possibly have autism) only you are saying it in less harsh terms. But I haven't gotten any indication from anything you have said that would lead me to believe that you feel any differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:24 AM
2

Tolerance is passive. Intolerance is not. That involves an active expression of annoyance at the very least. And the kind of people who you not sorry for being intolerant of could simply be people with autism, and are unable to pick up on social cues.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:22 AM
2

No one? Here is one woman expressing the true feeling of women about awkward beta males (aka neckbeards). https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6rsz3g/google_employees_antidiversity_manifesto_goes/dl7ybjy/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:17 AM
1

Attractive people are assumed to have all those things. If you are attractive, you can even get away with being incompetent, as people will still believe you know what you are doing. It sort of how laws only apply to the masses, not the people at the top.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:16 AM
0

Intolerant and contempt are pretty much synonymous. But I appreciate the additional evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:12 AM
2

You are describing a con-artist right now. The rest of the women (and even men) in this thread and other Nice Guy(TM) threads describe an awkward beta male that deserves scorn for being an awkward beta, and him expression frustration over that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:06 AM
3

Right. And this is what happens when a guy a woman believes is beneath her tries to interact with her, even when it's completely platonic and work-related. They are bothered by the very fact that you exist, hence the scorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 03:03 AM
1

This is the sort of thing I was referring to: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6rsz3g/google_employees_antidiversity_manifesto_goes/dl7ybjy/ You can cut the contempt with a knife it is so thick in that post. The fact that shy, awkward beta males even exist is a bother to women, but how dare they seek employment in the presence of modern goddesses! They should just off themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 02:57 AM
1

Who is "everyone"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 02:54 AM
1

Again you are conflating the two. A person putting on an act is not a Nice Guy beta male that's just too akward or shy. That's a con artist. But you believe the con artist, stalker, potential rapist, and Nice Guy(TM) shy awkward beta male are all the same thing. See here for a perfect example of what I am talking about. The fact that these guys even exist is an annoyance for women. How dare they.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 02:52 AM
1

Then he is a stalker and not a Nice Guy(TM). The fact that you conflate the two just proves my earlier point that you and many other women have contempt for them, for even existing. It's the same shit with the whole Creepy label.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 02:33 AM
3

In the Anglosphere West, attractiveness is everything for men. The more attractive you are, the better jobs and reviews you land.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 02:30 AM
1

Because they protest their invisibility. Hence the contempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 02:03 AM
1

What does "basically stalking her" mean? Was he or wasn't he stalking her? If he was actually stalking her, then he is not a Nice Guy(TM) but a stalker. That's an entirely different realm.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 01:50 AM
2

Your friend didn't make herself crystal clear. She danced around it and tried to be Nice Girl(TM). She liked him as an orbiter that did stuff for her but as soon as he tried to make it more than platonic she got annoyed. She set herself up. As far as projecting sour grapes go, it's not too far-fetched to consider a drug dealer that verbally and physically abused the women in his life, including the one I was interested in at the time, to be a hoodlum.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 01:38 AM
1

OK, now here is my take. Many years ago, I was a lot like that guy. I took advice from women and media at face value - thinking it was sincere, when really it was terrible advice if not an outright lie. The lie was that "it's what inside that counts". You just have be a great guy and you'll get the girl. Don't worry, she'll come to her senses. This shit was reinforced by female relatives (some from older generations), friends, and girls (that incidentally would egg me on to keep trying). The fru…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 01:01 AM
2

That's what really irks women, isn't? That they "don't know their place" (beneath them) and they dare feel frustrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 12:21 AM
1

Can you elaborate on this for me, please? I'm genuinely curious. Have you ever tried to look at things from their perspective? What is the disrespect they are showing, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 11:22 PM
2

No one said it was. Stop the strawman arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 11:19 PM
1

Of course not sleeping with them is not bullying them. No one ever said it was, except for feminists who strawman the actual intentions of Nice Guys. The bullying comes from the hatred these guys receive online and offline for being frustrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 11:19 PM
1

OK, let's do this. What are your feelings about Nice Guys(TM)?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 11:17 PM
2

You talk like you are Chad but really are just as much of a Nice Guy(TM) as the ones you ridiculing. Stop pretending like you are some badass or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 11:12 PM
1

How do you explain the 5:1 ratio? According to you, it should be near 1:1 but it isn't. And who cares if it is entirely different culture? It used to be our culture too. Do you honestly think your parents are such fuck-ups that they can't chose a decent man for you? Or are you happier riding the CC until hopefully you stumble across the right man? Because Indian arranged marriages are very successful. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-science-behind-behavior/201511/why-are-so-many-indian-…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 11:11 PM
2

Yes, he did. But he wasn't exactly in demand by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:59 PM
1

I think only marginally. I think those men whose wives are selecting for them for reasons other than sexual attraction/love will not be having a very satisfying sex life with them. Indians have arranged marriages. They aren't forced into it as they can still say no, but the candidates are selected by the fathers. Fathers are, in my opinion, far better judges of character than their daughters are. They aren't having a problem with sex or divorce rates like we are. The Pareto principle is not mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:56 PM
1

Of course it would be a benefit to struggling men. Female sexuality exclusively goes after the top 20% of men, excluding 80% of them. Male sexuality, on the other hand, follows a bell-shaped curve distribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:37 PM
2

Have you read some of the responses to the Google Memo guy? And about nerdy white men in the tech industry? Women even detest the idea of being around these men, having to work with them. The difference is that you immediately fuck off when you are rejected. These guys don't. So it's how dare they not know their place in the sexual hierarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:34 PM
1

Then why are you here trying to correct me?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:27 PM
1

You are so convinced that no other way is possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:26 PM
1

I'm not going to argue with you about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:25 PM
1

Sorry, but I'm not just going to take your word for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:22 PM
1

Look at this thread and others like it. They're full of Nice Guy beta male hate
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:19 PM
3

Who implied any of that? I certainly didn't. Feel free to reject whoever you want for any reason or no reason. That's not the problem. The problem is the shit said about them as if they were inhuman creatures. Them desiring human affection is normal Their frustration at rejection is also normal You and others like you hate them not because of their reaction to rejection, but because how dare they not know their place in the sexual hierarchy! I am only entitled to Chads To prove my point, check o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:16 PM
2

Try 80% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:00 PM
1

I'm the one advocating for patriarchy here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:56 PM
1

The "common good" what? No, no one is interested, man or woman, in basing their sex/love life decisions on the "common good" whatever societal thing you mean by that. You mean YOU are not interested. You are not everyone. You realize that the majority of women are not doing this? Most women meet up with their future spouse while they are still pretty young. They are not all settling after "Chad" rejects them over and over again. Got any data on that? Most women hop on at least a few dicks before…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:56 PM
2

What evidence is there of men knowing better? Seriously? It's almost as if I am talking with a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:52 PM
3

You're projecting. The Nice Guy meme is a feminist conspiracy theory, much like "creepy" is a rationalization of their shallowness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:51 PM
3

I'm seeing contempt precisely where it is. And most men, as I have demonstrated in various studies, DO NOT fall in the middle category. Most men are not even noticed by women, as if they didn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:50 PM
1

Is this an admission that women really aren't interested in the common good, but instead whatever gives them vagina tingles? You're not looking at the big picture here. Is it satisfying for a woman to spend most of her youth and fertility riding the CC, being in Chad's de facto harem only to be discarded later several times over? Are women really happy that they are competing over the exact same guys over and over while not even giving most men a chance? I'm seeing a lot of regret from women out…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:46 PM
1

Partially correct. X is ultimately any man that a woman believes is beneath her in the sexual market - meaning most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:41 PM
2

Naturalist fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:39 PM
0

The contempt you have for them is very noticeable in everything you've written.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:37 PM
1

Exactly what it looked like the last time Patriarchy was imposed on an unregulated market 4000-5000 years ago: a boom of Y-DNA genetic diversity, meaning the ratio of female to male reproduction was closer to 1:1 instead of the 5:1 it is now.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:36 PM
0

What's so bad? Uh... inbreeding?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:32 PM
2

Once again, it isn't the rejection at issue here. It is the contempt shown for them that is at issue. Enough with the strawmen, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:32 PM
1

Regulate the market. Good ole fashioned patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:31 PM
5

You are really hung up on this sex thing. It's like you see them as rapists. I suppose in a committed relationship sex would come into it, but for a date? Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:30 PM
2

It is the same IRL as well. Genetic evidence also demonstrates this. Western women have insane requirements.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:11 PM
1

It is not the fact that she rejected the guy. It is endless bitching about their existence and the bullying.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:10 PM
0

That's the naturalist fallacy. Because something is natural doesn't mean it is "good". Causing a massive bottleneck in Y-DNA genetic diversity can hardly be considered good for humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:08 PM
6

Why do you keep bringing sex into this? A guy asking you out is not demanding sex from you. Drop the stupid sex conspiracy already. And yes, you do believe these awkward beta males are contemptible. At least be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:43 PM
0

You treat the ubermensch concept differently than how Nietzsche actually intended it. Nietzsche treated it as descriptive and not prescriptive. There is nothing wrong, at least according to Nietzsche, with slave morality. He even pointed out that slave morality helped the Jews achieve power and prestige. Some of it has to do with state of mind, so no argument there. As I said, help your fellow men out when you can. Don't shit on them. These betas are not a threat to you. They actually benefit yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:40 PM
3

I mean that the only reason why they piss women off is because Western women are princesses where even ugly ones believe they are entitled to be around solely hot guys. Women view them as being beneath them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:33 PM
3

Women treat them with contempt because how dare they not know their place in the sexual hierarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:29 PM
1

That's the Just World Fallacy. Not everyone has the ability to control their own destinies for reasons out of their control.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:23 PM
1

The problem with that is that you just accept it "as is". Women make the rules, you just follow. That's the whole problem right there. Women making the rules on who gets to reproduce and who doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:21 PM
1

You read it incorrectly, then
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:19 PM
1

Here is my view on the whole matter: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/72s3iq/nice_guys_and_niceguystm_im_trying_to_flesh_this/dnl050q/ If it isn't Patriarchy, it's death.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:18 PM
2

Exactly what it sounds like
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:17 PM
1

Just world fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:17 PM
1

The point being is that in an unrestricted sexual market, women will decide who is fit for reproduction and who is not. Their choices don't follow a normalized bell-shaped curve as a man's choices would. Instead, women opt for only the top men and exclude the vast majority of men as demonstrated by DNA evidence. In other words, mating will devolve into Pareto Efficiency, meaning only 20% of men maximum will be getting 80% of the women. This is what happened in an unhindered market. It's the same…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:14 PM
6

Where does sex even come into it? When has any one of these guys ever said: "That bitch won't fuck me because I did something nice for her"? Never. This is a feminist conspiracy theory and strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 06:08 PM
1

Pulling triggers is a rather recent invention in the grand scheme of human social evolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:41 PM
1

I am successful in this market. Don't assume shit just because I have some sense of justice for my fellow men. I was in their position once. I improved. But the problem with RP is precisely that it is praxeology in the current market. The current market is degenerate and only helps in the decline of Western civilization. Don't shit on your fellow men. Help them if you want, but don't screw them over.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:40 PM
7

Nonsense. Women find 80% of men to be below average in attractiveness. Women's standards are a reverse quadratic expression, whereas men have normalized bell-curves in what they consider attractive AS IT SHOULD BE. But even UGLY women think they deserve a hot guy. Just look at the chart in the study. That's insane. You still treat those betas like garbage because they aren't attractive enough for you. You should practice some self-awareness and admit to yourself that you are shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:33 PM
1

Women often complain about what they actually want. It's a positive reinforcement loop: sexually liberated women desire aggressive men. They get aggressive men that fuck them and chuck them. They desire such men even more. Repeat until woman in question becomes post-wall lonely cat lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:20 PM
1

Maybe. But clearly some guys require more work than others. As much as I tend to agree with RP most of the time, RP is nothing more than "how to get laid in a feminist society". RP makes no effort to change what society and sexual culture has become, but rather only gives advice on how to adjust to the bullshit we are living it. The whole sexual culture as it is now needs to be trashed entirely. RP merely collaborates with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:15 PM
1

Whoops. Misread your initial response. It looked like you wrote "are feminist traits".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:12 PM
1

Sure, some of those High IQ lads convert that IQ into alphabux. That's few and far between. Most of those guys with High IQ lack the social skills necessary to make big bucks in a Darwinistic capitalist society. Most of them just withdraw socially but still invent cool shit to make your life and the lives of the women who despise them easier and more comfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:10 PM
2

Oh yeah, how dare men question anything that a woman does? Women do it all the time. How much of the feminist bitch-fest is dedicated to how much men suck and how stupid they are? Don't be ridiculous. You aren't some holy saint above criticism or question. That's your princess mentality talking. What is really disturbing here is the amount of bullying you and the others engage in when it comes to some poor bastards that just want human affection like everyone else. You treat them like garbage, l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:07 PM
1

Sometimes it is chemical imbalances in their brains that stops them. Other times it is psychological.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:03 PM
0

To the former: yes, I am able. To the latter: all women by default chase the top 20% of men. To clarify that "Top 20%" further, it is really the Top 1% of men women chase, but end up slightly adjusting their expectations (only slightly, though) and you end up with the top 20%, which includes beta males that were able to score Chad's sloppy seconds.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:01 PM
0

"Creepy" is woman-speak (a rationalization) for a man she does not find attractive that tries to get a date with her. I mean how dare he not know his place in the sexual hierarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 04:57 PM
0

It's not you that I was referring to, but all the contemptuous comments that follow such threads. Just check out all the hate spewed toward shy and awkward beta males just for desiring human affection. It's sickening.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 04:55 PM
0

Some can, some cannot.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 04:54 PM
0

It doesn't work that way. Not every guy is a carbon copy of Chad Thundercock waiting to break free.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 04:31 PM
6

Yes they are. With the endless amounts of threads about them and all the hate spewed about them AND all the various articles around the internet about them, they very clearly are viewed as subhuman. Maybe women wouldn't be blamed if they didn't have princess complexes believing they are all entitled to be surrounded by confident hot guys and nothing but.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 04:29 PM
1

This means a guy needs confidence to be able to score a woman, at least in the West. It's different in places like Japan, where a shy, awkward guy confessing his love for a woman off the cuff can still land him in a relationship. Women in the West despise such men, as you can see by all the threads about them, incels, and betas. The contempt is palpable. This is because Western women, especially of the Anglosphere, believe they are entitled to be surrounded by hot guys and nothing but.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 04:26 PM
0

There really isn't. They're not the ones who are insane for thinking in terms of quid pro quo in a social arrangement. No one likes a one-sided situation. The problem here isn't these guys being pissed about a one-sided situation, it is rather that women view them as subhuman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 04:21 PM
0

There's nothing wrong with covert contracts. Things like honor, loyalty, and respect are also covert contracts. They are implicitly expected in return for X. Not showing proper amounts of these in return could lead to very negative reactions. They exist because most folks don't like one-sided social arrangements. Like in Japan: MUST you use the proper form of "-sama" or "-dono" or "-san"? Nope. You won't go to jail. But you will be considered a cretin and a fucking asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 04:06 PM
6

Women only hate them because they aren't Chad and they don't "know their place" in the sexual hierarchy (they are subhuman to most women).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 04:02 PM
1

If you are overly emotional, it demonstrates that you lack control over your emotions. In terms of natural selection, this can put a woman at a major disadvantage if she is attached to a guy that is unable to remain calm and control himself as such a situation could end in violence. A guy who can control himself has control over the situation. This is a leadership trait. Stoic implies self-control and even better for the woman, a man she cannot control or easily figure out - a man of mystery.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 03:57 PM
4

High IQ doesn't offer an advantage in the mating game. If anything, it is a disadvantage. You only need IQ high enough to be tactically clever in combat. It's not like historically speaking women were were fighting over who gets to fuck the tribal shaman or witch-doctor. These lads were hermits, often celibate. How many women were fighting over Leonardo Da Vinci? Or Plato? Or Nikola Tesla? Or Isaac Newton? Women aren't attracted to smarts, despite endless BS claims that they are. They are attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 03:52 PM
1

Let me tell you a historical story about about Beta male nice guys and Chad Thundercock. Around 8000 years ago, Chad Thundercock showed up in Europe, bringing with him farming from the Near East. Europeans at the time were hunter-gatherers: the guys being the shy, inoffensive beta male types. But Stacy the Hunter-Gatherer's knickers were soaked by the idea of Chad, having landed property where he could grow food and trade it rather than having to hunt or forage for it. So Chad went around bangin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 03:40 PM
4

Nice guy is just someone to bully, which is why there are 100 threads here every day about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:49 PM
2

This is one of the best comments I have ever read anywhere. Without High IQ nice guys, we would be back to hunter-gatherer lifestyles. With the old patriarchy pretty much being gone and no one to fend for Nice Guy beta males, civilization is screwed. We can already see so many things coming apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:47 PM
-1

I agree with you in principle, but the truth is that natural selection doesn't care. And outside of absolute Patriarchal control over who gets what in the mating game, natural selection is decided by women and devolves into Pareto Efficiency, with 80% of men being left out. This is why the Patriarchy of old was wonderful, it made the mating game more equitable by ensuring that almost every man had a woman of his own station, same for women. This way not all women were gunning for the top 20% of …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:39 PM
3

This is why men should never listen to what women say, but instead observe what they do. And really, this bullying of shy, awkward guys needs to stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:33 PM
1

They have to overestimate how attractive they are to females because females consider 80% of males to be below average attractiveness. In which case, they need something else other than strictly their looks. And more confident and attractive people land better jobs and reviews. Again, very subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:28 PM
1

lol no
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:26 PM
3

It also breeds low-IQ mouth breathers. Intelligence is not a requisite for mating. High IQ? NO PUSSY FOR YOU.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:24 PM
1

But who decides competence if it is subjective? Confidence implies competence.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:22 PM
1

Here is the problem with that: competence is subjective. Confidence is infectious, and others will also believe that the subject in question is competent based on the subject's confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 01:56 PM
1

It's unfortunate, but natural selection penalizes the shy and awkward. That's just reality and it will never change. Vomiting emotions is a turn off because it shows lack of discipline and no control over emotions. Men who can control their emotions (women love the stoic) are instead prized.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 01:48 PM
1

Point to the studies, then. And what does stubborn and confident have to do with lack of introspection?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 01:44 PM
1

Because males on average are more disagreeable(which means stubborn) than females, they are less likely to be introspective What the hell? Exactly what do you base that on?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 01:37 PM
3

Not everyone is able to cope with change. Not everyone can just "change tactics" when something fails. They are unaware that their tactics do not apply in the modern Western world. The nice guy bit might work in a more traditional culture (East Asia) or a culture with a lot of chavs, like in Eastern Europe. "Manipulative" is bullshit. They aren't trying to manipulate anyone, at least not consciously. The mating game itself is large part manipulation, with every guy trying to act like Chad Thunde…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 01:32 PM
1

OK, I looked at Table 1. That shows me birth rates of women based on education level. How is that telling me anything at all about all the men that have been left out of the dating/mating game, versus the ones that haven't been left out? Just look up Pareto Efficiency. Everything in nature is subject to it, even human mating. Our genetics confirm this. Online dating confirms this. College dating confirms this. 80% of the women are going after only 20% of the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 08:32 PM
1

anyone not able to achieve them must have something seriously wrong with them Which would be most men on Earth
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 07:50 PM
3

Women would rather commit suicide than date below their standards
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 07:47 PM
3

I love how they frame it as a "shortage of eligible men" rather than what it really is, a shortage of women with non-absurd standards. By framing it as a "shortage of eligible men", they imply that most men are taken, or that there are far more women than men in the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 07:46 PM
3

THIS. Women are more than happy to build a following of dedicated orbiters that are immediately crushed the moment they try to get out of orbit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 07:41 PM
1

This report tracks the men that have actually fathered a child See here for a 2006 example: http://www.webmd.com/men/news/20060601/how-many-men-become-fathers Again, this is reported by men that have actually fathered a child and does not include the ones that haven't. See here (also supports 5-1 ratio): https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0f1561e And of course, the Pareto Principle which also supports the 5-1 ratio as accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 07:29 PM
3

You just contradicted yourself: Don't be fake! But don't do what you normally like to do. Just be yourself is the worst piece of garbage advice that can ever be given.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 06:50 PM
1

Wrong. Read it again. The 5:1 ratio is a modern global average. With third world nations producing more children than the West, the modern Western ratio is even worse than 5:1
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 06:48 PM
1

The problem is that women are so selective that most men are completely left out of not only the ability to find a mate (and some affection), but reproduction all-together. The traits that are considered attractive to women eliminate most men from the dating/mating game. See here: https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success In more recent history, as a global average, about four or five women reproduced for every one man. 5-to-1 ratio of women reproducing to men. That is insane
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 06:42 PM
12

That's because they aren't entitled. It's the other way around, the women are entitled. Their standards are insanely high, thinking they all deserve to be surrounded by sociable, attractive men and nothing but sociable and attractive men. https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0f1561e
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 06:20 PM
2

I don't think that these men are the problem. What they experience is a normal, natural, and healthy desire to find affection and a mate. The whole "entitlement" thing is a Western feminist projection: they all believe they should ONLY be surrounded by cute guys/Chads. This was plainly obvious with the reaction to the Google Memo guy. The fact that they don't know that being a "nice guy" is completely worthless in the West and only do it based on a lie that they've been sold for ages, isn't comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 06:16 PM
2

Way to be an edgy, overly-nihilistic, YOLO twat. "NOTHING MATTERS GUYS!!! There's no objective morality!" That's a woman's attitude. And this is precisely why women have never accomplished anything without men.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 04:29 PM
2

Why do you honestly care what they want? Caring what they want is precisely what they want. Stop giving them attention and you'll instantly improve yourself and all of society.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 04:23 PM
0

Not really. The MRM is about the long-term goal of restoring the classic patriarchy - a scheme that benefited everyone from the highest king to the lowliest serf. Feminism is a complete inversion of that: total nihilistic chaos with only the strong ever benefiting. Just look at all the corporate harems that feminism has created.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 02:04 PM
6

I wouldn't mind being seen with a chubby. And by chubby I mean a little extra. I don't mean fat/obese.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 08:57 PM
2

Then explain why there are so many women in the world doing so many things as good as or better than men? [Citation Needed] That's because other than in physical areas women have just as much utility as men. That's because other than in physical areas women have theoretically have just as much utility as men. The reality is women use their sex appeal to men to get what they want, including sucking and fucking their way up the ladder of life. Men do not have this ability to spread their legs and …
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 08:20 PM
2

That is because women have the least amount of utility to society. Other than their wombs, they haven't offered up much for the past - I dunno - few million years. Even a retarded man can lift stuff and do other back-breaking labor. Hell, they can even kill in warfare. So the little utility women have turns into negative utility with feminism: i.e. We just want them to FUCK OFF.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 07:35 PM
2

lol nice attempt at shaming/changing the conversation. I could be a worthless NEET leeching off of society. It doesn't matter. I am not the topic here. Feminism and equality are. Let's frame the question like this: What have WOMEN (as a group) done to deserve equality with MEN (as a group)? Because when you are preaching equality, you aren't preaching for it to exist between individuals, since that cannot be regulated. Equality therefore can only apply in where it can be enforced: the common goo…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:54 PM
2

Nope. This isn't about you, me, or any particular woman.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:34 PM
2

I guess an important question is where do you meet women? Everywhere. Women are everywhere. They don't just exist in bars or in academia. It's a bit difficult to coexist with half of the population and never speak to them. Go to a top level university for demanding and difficult fields and see what the women there are like. And they are nothing special. If anything, they think their academic credentials precludes any and all criticism. They are even less interesting and more neurotic. You have t…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:26 PM
2

If you only surround yourself with women who talk nonsense then it will seem like that's what all women are like. It's called confirmation bias. Interesting women must be like unicorns, then. Mythical creatures that exist only in the imagination. This circle jerk on here that women are just mindless emotional drones is just ridiculous. They aren't mindless. They are simply entitled. When shit is handed to them on a silver platter every step of their lives, they feel no need to make an effort. Th…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 05:50 PM
19

I admit she was chubby Who cares? Chubbies can be fun. Chubbies are like women in their thirties: the lower-self esteem means more submissive and she'll try to make up for her lacking in prime looks elsewhere, like trying to keep your interest. They'll also put out more. And the self-esteem isn't so low as to be irritating and disgusting like with obese women.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 05:41 PM
3

You're way too positive. I'm hoping for an asteroid or more Ebola.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 05:06 PM
3

So a woman is cancer if she thinks that rape culture is a bunch of bullshit, divorce courts are ridiculously biased and unfair to men, thinks that woman should be part of the draft, understands that the wage gap is a myth, and thinks that if a woman attacks a man he should fight back the same as if she were a man and then she should have charges pressed against her? Sounds like you just described an anti-feminist. Even the most agreeable feminists are detrimental to any civilization. Listen - do…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 04:58 PM
0

How to move away from her: Tell her to fuck off. Or stop talking to her. No need to over-complicate things.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 04:00 PM
1

I'd like to add Might Is Right by Ragnar Redbeard to that list. Nothing pisses people off more than that book.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 03:57 PM
2

If there's anything I'm not, it's an egalitarian.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 03:21 PM
1

(My Ex now) said she didn’t know but had had an affair How can you NOT know you had an affair? This guy actually fell for that line?
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 03:06 PM
4

So I wonder why feminists hate the red pill so much. We're giving them what they want, right? Can't we all just get along? Feminism is women at their absolute worst. They want to have it all. They want to fuck around but later regret it and put the guys in prison. They want equality but don't want to do any heavy lifting. They want all the benefits of civilization and NONE of the work. It's princess mentality and I'm pretty goddamned sure just about all Western women have it. At least under Patr…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 03:01 PM
5

Due process doesn't fucking matter when you have 50% of the voting population deciding things based on their feels at the time. Look at how women are now abandoning Obama and they voted him in TWICE so the guy could trash this country. How about we just stop caring what the other half think?
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 02:52 PM
4

The shitty thing is that true feminists... Forget that "true feminists" bullshit. That's a classic "No True Scotsman" fallacy. A feminist is a feminist. Some cancers are worse than others, but they are still CANCER.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 02:48 PM
2

Even the most hardcore RPer on here is most likely an Equity Feminist. Nah, don't think so. Women as a group vote with their feels and are by far the most easily manipulated demographic. But since we can't turn back the clock - absent a catastrophic civilization-killing event - we have to make the best of the massive turd we handed ourselves by giving them the vote.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 02:46 PM
1

She's like Belle Knox. She's fighting the patriarchy by doing porn and gagging on 800 cocks at a time. Nothing says empowerment like getting bukkake from random dudes.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 09:06 PM
0

You don't know what you are talking about. Feminism is virtual non-existent in the old Soviet Bloc. Here is why: In the 1920s and into the Stalinist era the concept of the “New Soviet Woman” served alongside that of the “New Soviet Man.” Her roles were vastly different than that of her male counterpart; she was burdened with a complex identity that changed with ideology shifts in the party doctrine toward more conservative notions of the role of the family and the mother in the Soviet system. Th…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 04:35 PM
3

Most people weren't starving.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 02:19 PM
2

As a side note, this sort of brings back some nostalgia from the old Soviet days. They were a different brand of Marxist, not like these Western retards. They were highly militaristic and stoic. I remember from the good ol' days in Eastern Europe when the army would goose-step through town, all the women would throw themselves at the men as if they all had massive cocks. My one older cousin would tell me stories of all the cunny he'd get while in the army. Here's an example from the old Communis…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 01:45 PM
1

What I find interesting is that despite "gender equality" propaganda in the old Soviet Communist Bloc, they are very anti-feminist. So while "gender equality" was theoretically preached, it was never practiced. Just do a google image search on the Soviet Politburo and you'll see it's like 99% men, always with a "strong man" in power. So while these days you'll hot women like Natalia Poklonskaya running the show in Crimea, she and other women like her always answer to Putin.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 01:14 PM
1

Sweden has the most attractive, probably. The problem with Swedish women is that they are very entitled.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 11:32 PM
1

Really good stuff. If you have enough historical data (that you can remember), you could use data mining to develop a profile of the woman that would sleep with you and a profile of a woman to avoid :P
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 12:57 PM
4

The easiest way to get into Data Mining is Microsoft Analysis Services. It comes with SQL Server 2012 and newer. Get any book on MSAS.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 11:52 AM
4

I've also worked with data mining. It's crazy how accurately the algorithms can predict behavior and outcomes within a few percentage points margin of error. Stuff that seems like they don't relate to each other actually do relate to show trends. I like Neural Networks and Clustering.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 02:53 AM
17

You only eat it once a year?
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 05:07 PM
1

But that doesn't fit reality though. That's just as bad as the gambler's fallacies.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 01:12 PM
1

In practice, though, most guys will give out 8-10's. That's a part of the problem, isn't it? Too many guys giving out 8-10 when they are, in fact, so rare. A woman you mentally rate higher will be treated better - and that is how she knows you rate her so high. Goes right to her ego.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 01:10 PM
2

You are absolutely correct. You could also do this with age, height, or other factors. And you'd be on the money most of the time. That's the beauty of normal distribution, the Bell Curve, and standard deviations. It's how Data Mining companies make the big bucks from amazingly accurate predictions.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 02:04 AM
1

It's not about the particular rating per se that is normally distributed. It's the quality of women. Even if the scale were 1-100 or 1-6 or whatever, 68% of women would still be totally average. And 13.5% on either side of that average would be slightly uglier or slightly prettier than average. That's 95% of the total. The Bell-Curve works regardless of what the score is because we know that average will always make up 68% of the population.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 01:59 AM
1

But I just demonstrated that it is possible with the math. Move away from a subjective system to the bell-curve model and you'll have a better gauge of what kind of woman you are dealing with. It's probability. The variety of women on this planet in the 18-35 age range is pretty normally distributed. You have lots of variety. The simple fact is 68% of women are completely average and an additional 13.5% of women on either side of that are slightly worse or better than average and that encompasse…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 01:56 AM
1

Why even consider her a 9? The fact is that if you have that 9 in your head, that'll come out through psychological projection. You'll end up treating her better than she objectively deserves. So considering her a 9 is pointless. Why give her a 9 if you only plan to treat her like a 7 anyway?
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 01:51 AM
1

The subjective scoring isn't normally distributed, the women are. That's my point. The women aren't going to change. Just like the cards in the deck aren't going to change. It's pretty well-shuffled in terms of women on the market. The flaw is in the subjective scoring.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 01:43 AM
2

The deck is pretty shuffled. It's not like one area is more prone to good poon and another not. It's mixed, thus normal distribution applies.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 11:08 PM
1

I've been out to clubs. They all look precisely average to me. Maybe a 7 here and there. The rest is all makeup and slutty outfits.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 06:23 PM
1

Your treatment of her. We naturally treat hotter women better. It's the same with women.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 05:53 PM
2

XD "Do you like brattwurst? I've can cook up a nice one for you"
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 05:20 PM
2

So how do you end up boning them? Do you wait for them to come to you?
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 04:57 PM
4

Even better. But then do you treat all of them like you wouldn't bang them?
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 04:46 PM
2

That just makes these numbers better for you. Most women statistically fall in the 18-35 year old range. Still ripe. Older and younger are invisible. That means they have a limited time frame to adjust their attitudes. And given that they are nothing special (95% rule), it just looks that much better for us.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 04:19 PM
1

You are absolutely right. This math scientifically demonstrates abundance. 95% of women are 4-7. That's a blowout of abundance.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 03:54 PM
0

But you DO share your rating with her. It comes out psychologically in your behavior. Women who you rate higher get treated better. This is a fact of life. If all of a sudden we rewired our brains to view her as being capable of no better than a 7, our attitudes and treatment of them adjusts accordingly. This is putting math and science behind the RP concept of "even if she is hot, don't treat her like it". Same concept.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 03:38 PM
1

That makes sense. My big concern with subjective ratings is that 95% of women are nothing special. By mentally giving her an 8-10, you are automatically treating her better than she deserves because she is the best you've come across. That inflates her ego.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 03:35 PM
1

You're missing the big picture. The scale doesn't matter. 1 to 10 is arbitrary. It could be 1 to 99 or 2.84689457689 to 8.459847598 The point is that that using an arbitrary and unscientific scoring system leads to women's ego inflation. If you think she is a 9 but in reality she is slightly above average, that difference goes to her ego because she gets treated better.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 03:11 PM
0

Here's the psychological problem with that: women that you view as hotter you will treat better. That's just fact. How many times have you read on TRP that even when you think a woman is hot, you shouldn't treat her as such? The problem with the subjective system as opposed to this objective system is that 1) you treat a woman better than she should be and 2) you end up putting her on a pedestal when you think she is a 10 but really she is a 7. What happens there is that 3 point differential goe…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 03:09 PM
9

Absolutely. Many of us have been around town. We've come to experience first hand every woman's princess story. They have these massive laundry lists of all the qualities they want in a man: a huge cock, a great job, confidence, adventure, ripped body, for us to look like Brad Pitt, all the while they bring little to nothing to the table other than their vaginas. I think the source has been 1) women are the selective sex and 2) we spoil them rotten, too much fantasy and not enough reality. Clear…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 02:59 PM
2

As a side note, it is not a "blind"/arbitrary method. You can apply these standard models to dice rolls or card games or anything else to determine probability. It works. The probability just isn't there for women to be above a 7 or 8, hence they do not warrant their princess attitudes. Edit: the methodology of saying a 7 is hotter than 70% of women is even more arbitrary than this. It is subjective to the women you have known. This is objective, since there are only 10 possibilities and each ha…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 02:22 PM
1

I'm trying to be objective versus subjective. A sampling of women is not likely to be different from the total population. Hence the normal distribution. I also set 1 hotness point at a 0.5 standard deviation. Granted there is a margin of error, but it is VERY small.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 02:16 PM
2

Of course they do. And even when a woman is "hot", she still has to pass the crazy test. The numbers simply do not support the pedestaling of women. 95% of women aren't anything special at all.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 02:09 PM
9

The reality is that women's standards for men are waaaaaaaaaay too high. Look at the numbers. Women these days want alpha men that are loaded walking banks when in reality they aren't anything special either.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 02:05 PM
1

That's right. Women make better consumers than men. Men by comparison are "stingy" with the finances.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 12:42 PM
1

No fucking way am I getting snipped. I have a neighbor that demanded that her husband get the snip. Fuck that. Get your own shit tied.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 12:28 PM
1

She doesn't warrant that massive laundry list of prince charming behaviors. She is average at best. The only thing she has going for her is her fame, and given her list, I'd rather settle for an average nobody with a little bit of humility.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 12:22 PM
1

My personal theory as to why this is, is the stigma evolved over thousands of years. The scientists and programmers of today were the shamans, priests, and druids of ancient times. They didn't get the respect that the warrior class got from the ladies, and were seen as a little bit effeminate (they didn't participate in war). The exception to this seems to be doctors. They get all kinds of poon. The difference? Doctors tend to take care of their bodies, appearance, and are narcissistic. But stig…
/r/askTRP24/10/14 01:11 PM
2

I love the Feminist comments on the article. They totally didn't get the article at all. They just immediately start parroting their absurd nonsense and create echo chambers.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 01:25 PM
4

If I were in his situation, I'd just say "fuck it" and leave the country. Head right for Russia. They can have all the warrants out for my arrest but it would do them no good there. That would be my revenge. You can take my money, but you aren't taking my dignity. Suicide would just mean the cunt and the system that allows her to be a welfare queen, would win.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 01:19 PM
2

Awesome Iron Pill material. Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 01:11 PM
2

Don't worry. Western society is dying. Vladimir Putin is just waiting for the right moment to stick his galactic-sized jimmy into the West's hemorrhaging vagina. It's a matter of time, really.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 01:44 PM
2

This is Salem witch trial stuff, guys. Speak out against it. You can't logic women. Mock these radfem cuntbags and make them look stupid, because they are.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 01:42 PM
3

Funny stuff, this. It demonstrates how delusional women can get if you let their minds hamster too much. They start to think their cunts are magical deus ex machina devices that can alter reality on their whim. But of course this only happens with betas, which are like most of the male population. So to conclude, without patriarchy and with full-blown feminism, we descend back into the barbarity of pre-civilization. It's our fault, really. We let this shit go on for far too long.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 01:32 PM
10

The reality is the complete opposite. It's the women that are cutthroat.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 08:20 PM
1

I'm venting. No need to get your panties in a bunch.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 06:24 PM
-1

A guy will appreciate it if you level with him and explain that it is not a big deal. We aren't evil. Yes, some will be scared away. And that's OK because guess what they are looking for? Why not look for men that seem to have more to bring to the table? And those men will also look for you to bring more to the table than just sex.
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/14 05:44 PM
2

Ravishing women involves a fantasy for the woman. It is the fantasy of conquest. The better you are at maximizing this fantasy during sex, the happier she will be, even if in reality you may not be the so well-endowed and what have you. Remember: fantasy.
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/14 05:26 PM
1

I realize it's not a "big deal" health wise, and even my physician said that I don't have to tell a guy if they have the HPV vacine, or once the pap smears clean, but that seems like lying. It IS lying. And if you don't tell the guy, you are manipulating him. It's dishonest. It sets a very bad precedent for the relationship. I'm slowly losing my mind. I feel like this will be a recurring theme with anyone I meet of any quality, and that any value I might've had is gone. Maybe we should talk ;)
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/14 05:23 PM
7

She's Scandinavian. That's all I need to know. They are the biggest spoiled princesses on the face of this entire planet. They are worshiped like goddesses. Their pussies have been placed on a pedestal since forever. Of course they want to fuck all the third world immigrants. They are spoiled princesses that think they deserve more than goddess status. Fuck her shit. I can't wait until Islamic patriarchy takes over Sweden and Norway. We'll see how those spoiled princesses behave then.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 05:17 PM
15

Nah, it allows women who believe they have tarnished their status by sleeping with a beta to remove the blemish from her record by having the poor son of a bitch imprisoned for rape. Further, it allows whores to write off the 800 cocks she's had in her as "rape". YOU CAN'T CALL ME A WHORE! I WAS RAPED 800 TIMES! That's all this is.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 01:07 PM
16

Wow! Feminism is fucking magic! It can alter reality and history!
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 01:04 PM
32

This shit is truly malicious. Putting a beta in prison for getting laid? The man deserves to be congratulated for pulling his shit together, not imprisoned because some bitch feels sorry about it.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 01:03 PM
6

I find it interesting how they hamster Bible stories when they are full of God smiting bitches like Jezebel with his holy pimp-hand.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 11:16 PM
8

Ever get the feeling women poison everything?
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 06:03 PM
9

If you want to understand Biblical RP vs. BP, just read up on the story of Jezebel, who corrupted her husband against God. Of course there is a certain website of the same name with the same purpose preaching feminism and barbarity. According to the biblical accounts, Jezebel incited her husband King Ahab to abandon the worship of Yahweh and encourage worship of the deities Baal and Asherah instead. Jezebel is said to have persecuted the prophets of Yahweh, and to have fabricated false evidence …
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 05:31 PM
14

The Red Pill ride doesn't end until you die, my friend. Once you get her, you need to maintain her by always being alpha. You're allowed slip ups, but you never know how many. That varies by woman. But too many slip ups and you're toast.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 05:22 PM
1

Threaten to go public. Public shaming.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 04:55 PM
1

Maybe I'm just projecting my manly logic on a woman. I see my error. What I really mean to say is I genuinely feel bad for the husband. He's in a really shitty spot. But at the same time, since he knew about it and approved of it, he could have blackmailed the fucker or told his wife to eat shit, he's getting a divorce and taking the kids because she's fucking her boss.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 04:15 PM
11

Time to start a business.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 03:32 PM
21

Jesus Christ. I know this shit goes on constantly and I don't want to let it get to hate, but Ebola can't wipe out Western civilization fast enough. Good luck, Ebola!
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 01:24 PM
68

"My husband had back surgery and i am the only one working for awhile now. The company I work for was going to lay off a, and I had begged my boss not to lay me off. He said if I had sex with him when he wants it, I could keep my job. I was shocked and told my husband and we talked and agreed we needed the money. Kevin (my boss) would have me not wear underwear to work because it was easier to have quick sex. So its been about 6 months now and its normally, call me in, bend over the desk, do nor…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 01:04 PM
4

Of all the advice that can be given here, maintaining frame is the best -- as this story demonstrates.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 06:29 PM
1

But you need the coping mechanism first. Get rid of those blue balls and then your mind will clear up to focus on long-term solutions. Don't feel bad about paying for pussy. It's actually a confidence booster.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 06:15 PM
2

D&D is cool and all, but don't ever bring it up in a conversation with a woman you are trying to bang. She will friendzone you instantly.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 05:30 PM
0

Yeah, pretty much if your hobby involves any of the following, you are fucked: Dungeons & Dragons, comic books, video games, collectibles (militaria is OK, though), card games (unless it's poker), cosplay, anime, LARP, ... ANY of these will make a woman run the other direction and consider you a loser. You can do these things, but NEVER bring them up in front of a woman you are trying to bang.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 05:26 PM
1

Bastard children were considered the scum of the earth and little was expected of them. They would make cheap labor and muscle for the Church that only had to house and feed them. Anyway, this was before there was even a concept of "citizenship".
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 05:19 PM
1

The Church didn't mind taking care of a whore's children. They'd often become nuns, monks, priests, etc. So when the patriarchy slut-shamed, it wasn't the slut per se, it was a warning to non-sluts to control their own sexuality. Which is different from women slut-shaming sluts, because of their ease of access.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 04:44 PM
2

Good question. I don't know how much burden of proof there is considering the marriage is very young, but I'm sure this varies with state. He could just say she refuses consummation and they'll probably issue a voiding of marriage cert.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 03:21 PM
1

Speaking of anima and animus, I'm reading Jung's stuff right now. I've liked his other works like "Wotan", but this is more relevant to TRP: What can a man say about woman, his own opposite? I mean of course something sensible, that is outside the sexual program, free of resentment, illusion, and theory. Where is the man to be found capable of such superiority? Woman always stands just where the man's shadow falls, so that he is only too liable to confuse the two. Then, when he tries to repair t…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 02:43 PM
1

Too many Sophia worshipers.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 02:14 PM
3

Prostitutes. They are there for you to blow your load and then go back to doing productive things in life.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 02:07 PM
13

I genuinely feel feels for beta orbiters. I want to help them pull their shit together. If they aren't getting laid, they are white knighting and being subversive. This is why the old Christian patriarchy was great. No retarded presumptions of equality, both men and women had their duties, and nearly everyone got laid/got a woman fit for their station. Patriarchy is the most fair and just system ever devised.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 01:06 PM
1

He'd have to do something to legally cover his ass.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 01:02 AM
2

Many women lack any self-awareness. RP women have that self-awareness to some extent at least. They realize why they do the things they do, and how the Yin and Yang go together.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 07:05 PM
6

What my sentence would be: Get lots of sticks and logs put them in big pile stand up the biggest log tie her to it petrol matches justice
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 05:38 PM
1

The annulments laws vary by state, but the usual is: if the marriage was coerced, fraudulent, or it was never consummated (like she refuses to do so), or if the couple is underage, or if it is incest. I don't even know how I know this. Sometimes I just look shit up just because. I probably heard the word and just looked it up once to see what it legally means.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 05:31 PM
4

The beauty of annulment is that you can get rid of a marriage as if it never happened. She doesn't owe you shit, you don't owe her shit. The end. But as soon as the penis enters the vagina, it is considered a marriage and only divorce can get you out of it.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 05:11 PM
5

I'm dead serious. It's not considered a marriage unless it is consummated. He can get an annulment if she refuses to put out.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 04:22 PM
11

They just got married. No consummation of marriage. That's annulment and he doesn't owe her shit legally.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 03:57 PM
28

Annulment. No divorce necessary. No pussy (consummation), no marriage. Even legally.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 03:57 PM
37

Has she tried to contact you since?
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 03:52 PM
5

You could be right, but people say a lot of shit on the Internet, both true and false. Could a fat ugly chick get a guy? Sure. But what she is saying is a stretch of the imagination.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 02:43 PM
2

you need to check your state's wiretap laws. In some states, recording her without her knowledge is a felony and would be inadmissible as evidence in a divorce case. Edit: and will land you in jail. Check the wiretap laws for your state!
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 01:48 PM
6

OP can use that as leverage since she stands to lose more in a divorce scenario than OP would. She makes more money, so she might have to pay him spousal support. This gives OP leeway to turn this around in his favor.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 01:46 PM
2

You're going to have a hard time, OP. I stay far away from career women because their status to looks ratio gives them a high opinion of themselves. And to be honest, you sound like the housewife in the scenario. It's not impossible to turn this around, but you need to put some effort into this. Get your ass to the gym. Improve your appearance. Stop falling for her shit test bait. Cook for yourself. Be less dependent on her. Get a separate checking account. Do manly shit around the house like fi…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 01:25 PM
-1

Despite all the supposed "anti-racism" in society today, the reality is everyone -- EVERYONE is racist to some degree. Some just hide it better than others. Russians are open and honest.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 01:08 PM
1

Russians aren't generic. Russians have different phenotypes. The ones you are referring to are East Baltids and Volgids. Look 'em up. They also have a lot of West Baltids and Nordids.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 01:06 PM
1

lol I negged a Russian girl once about her race. Clearly she was European. But I'd bust her chops because she was a little darker than the average Russian. So I'd call her a Turk and a Gypsy. She'd flip her shit but she kinda liked it.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 01:05 PM
3

What interesting about the Russian women (or Ukrainian, or Slovak, Polish, etc.) is that if they like you, they'll tell you where you fucked up and how to improve to get them into bed. When they do that, don't lose frame.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 01:03 PM
2

I feel honor-bound to continue my line. To each their own.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 01:54 AM
20

Everyone that disagrees with the status quo is literally Hitler.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 09:55 PM
11

Western women are hardcore retarded in general and it is 100% our fault because we let them get that way. It's the old Victorian idea of romanticism and putting the pussy on a pedestal. Undoing all the bullshit would be a monumental task and these bitches aren't worth the effort. Go for greener pastures. And if she doesn't want to do things your way, give her the walking papers. That simple.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 09:46 PM
9

Check him out on Wikipedia. He's been sent to prison 4 times for hurt feelz.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 09:36 PM
7

23andme.com $99 and you get knowledge of both male and female sides, along with % ethnic makeup. They also give you your full genome that you could download and analyze with third party tools like GEDmatch. I'm Y-DNA Haplogroup I1, the same as many Vikings were. It's a Scandinavian male lineage that dates back to Ice Age. So I am descended from the same man that every other I1 is descended from. My mother's side is U5, which is another Scandi/Baltic haplogroup dating back to the Ice Age as well.…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 07:37 PM
1

Of course, big picture on MY terms, not hers ;)
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 04:12 PM
4

Find a non-Western woman. I'd recommend Slavic women. But you have to vet them to make sure they aren't visa-baiting.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 03:05 PM
15

For me, I'm looking at the big picture. Fun is fun; business is business. What I mean by this is that there comes a time to get down to business. It was put into perspective when I had a DNA test done. I discovered that I descend from an unbroken line of men that dates back to at least the Ice Age. Can you believe that? They survived the super harsh conditions of ice and snow everywhere, all year round. These guys were total bros. MEN among men. I owe it to then to continue that line. I owe it t…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 01:35 PM
1

Awww man you ruined my dramatic effect! J/k :p
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 06:39 PM
1

Now that you mention impulsivity in connection to higher levels of testosterone, I read a paper recently that suggested that Neolithic men had less testosterone than Paleolithic men, suggesting that the decrease in testosterone and impulsivity made farming, and thus civilization, possible.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 02:39 PM
1

It is trivial. But to a woman who vets her alpha, this is the same as keeping score. She remembers this shit because she has to -- her brain is analytical-intuitive for this very reason.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 02:31 PM
24

We have a bad rep because people these days can't deal with the harsh realities of mother nature. Strip away all the pleasantries and poetry from the mating game and what you have is the end-game of perpetuating the species, just like every other goddamn creature on this planet, from single-cell Ebola to His Royal Highness, the Duke of Cambridge.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 02:27 PM
3

In most of the West these days, feelz > realz
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 02:22 PM
1

More sources here: http://www.redditlog.com/snapshots/1017721
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 02:01 PM
1

Yeah I know it sounds silly, but the point is to stand out somehow. It doesn't matter how. Just enough to grab female attention. It's bait. Then you reel it in like an alpha.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 01:56 PM
1

There's even more sources ... I'll go find them...
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 01:25 PM
7

The bitter truth is that we live in a time in which women's infidelity is romanticized by the media Because women aren't guys with vaginas. They are women. They have no conception of male abstractions like honor, therefore they don't understand loyalty, as such things are against her female nature. Loyalty in relation to a woman is commanded by the man in the relationship. She's "loyal" to him because he enforces his will.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 01:22 PM
2

Here one paper talking about it: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.6231.pdf The other interesting piece is that THREE men are responsible for the current European/White population. Three men raped and pillaged their way through the land and the women's wombs. http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/25/abstract
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 01:16 PM
4

The bottom line is 30-40% of men run their own harems. It's a ratio that is over 2:1. The old patriarchy helped level the playing field, to even things out a bit, so even the lowly peasant could get a woman. Now we are back to barbarity. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.6231.pdf
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 01:11 PM
2

I can see that. The point is to not be invisible. In a room full of guys flexing their muscles, be the guy conspicuously reading an interesting book. Bet she comes over and says "Hi! Whatcha reading?"
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 02:51 AM
1

Gotcha. Maybe I should do a write up about Slavic/Eastern European chicks. Spent a lot of time there in different countries. Best time of my life. GREAT gals!
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 12:18 AM
2

You need to be careful with that. Act alpha ALWAYS. Meaning, be confident and take charge. DONT be a dick and don't be beta. With them you need to be the sweet alpha. They love gifts but not expensive ones. They actually appreciate the thought you put into something. But ta gotta take charge and not be a dick about it. Negging also doesn't work.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 12:10 AM
1

Honestly, sluts are great. They're really down-to-earth because they have no ego left. They're very inexpensive too.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 02:09 PM
5

Yes. I have nothing against sluts. They are fun. But I go for either high numbers or low numbers. In between they tend to have an over-inflated and unwarranted opinion of themselves. Just personal experience.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 08:23 PM
1

Those numbers are too high in my opinion. A few at most is my max. I have too many bad experiences with women that have more.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 06:26 PM
1

From Ragnar Redbeard's Might Is Right: Women instinctively admire soldiers, athletes, king’s nobles, and fighting-men generally, above all other kinds of suitors — and rightly so. Nothing so lowers a lover in a virile maiden’s estimation, than for him to be “whipped” in a personal encounter with a rival. Among all classes of females this sentiment persists. The best bid a man can make for the admiration of any woman (even the most pious) is a display of undaunted physical prowess. Young women ha…
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 05:24 PM
7

You don't even need to do that. Don't even mention her looks. Just pretend they aren't there and you are talking to a 4-6 rather than a 9-10. Better yet, pretend you are bored with her or seem aloof. Don't smile too fucking much. Just give a shitty half-assed grin AT THE MOST.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 01:11 PM
1

I was QUOTING a comment from the OP's link, for fuck's sake. Stop DOWNVOTING ME.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 06:07 PM
5

Oh god this comment... my sides can't take any more... I should have seen this coming when I found out that she had been with 50 different men by age 24. Fuck you. You cannot and should not judge anyone by the number of partners they have had; especially if you're going to try to correlate that to the cause of their infidelity. Infidelity is caused by poor moral character, promiscuity is not. I say this as someone with 56 partners, and I've never cheated. Ever. The cognitive dissonance in this o…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 01:13 PM
3

That's why I go for the 8-10. Nothing to lose and most men are intimidated by them. You'd fare better than you'd imagine.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 12:03 AM
3

The upper class and intelligentsia are just as racist as everyone else. Their anti-racism is a status symbol. They adopt a few Africans to show off to their friends "hey look at me, I'm so tolerant!" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130811005342.htm
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 11:58 PM
1

The bottom line is that it is to the alpha's benefit to make sure betas are getting laid regularly. Because if they aren't the start becoming orbiters and white knights that subvert the alpha's power base. I'm thinking long term, like you are. You can't save civilization for future men and women if all you are concerned about is game. I can get laid and game, no problem. I would just rather focus on being productive instead of wasting time in the pool of fish. Game is a short-term strategy in th…
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 03:01 PM
1

most parents don't know shit because most parents are mediocre And why are they mediocre? They grew up as the people that pissed away all of civilization or were their bastard children. Fuck Boomers.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 02:41 PM
3

Keep in mind we conquered the world while we were still marrying out our daughters to suitable men. The feminist inversion of civilization begins by destroying the bedroom and the institutions holding civilization together - traditions borne out of trial-and-error and necessity and kept MEN and WOMEN in harmony. Just like Game is a necessary reaction to feminist retardation. Women clearly have the massive mating game sexual advantage. Patriarchies leveled the playing field.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 02:28 PM
2

The Queen was the equivalent of a Majordomo. She was absolute master of the "household" (castle, manor, etc.) and she commanded an army of servants, chamberlains, ladies-in-waiting, maids, cooks, etc. etc. Often times she would leave the day-to-day management to the actual Majordomo/Steward/Seneschal, but that was her domain.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 02:24 PM
3

This was a situation where just about everyone had somebody. Betas weren't used as a personal army for femishits because they were guaranteed a woman. The top social groups got the best stuff. No game required, no hamstering. Whatever was left trickled down to betas, gammas, and finally to omegas. The system worked so well until the equality bullshit started killing everything. I don't mind gaming, but if I had to give up gaming and this shit feminist world for an ordered society where you are g…
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 02:19 PM
4

Jesus Christ, she's hideous. Clooney married waaaaaaaaaay below his status.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 02:11 PM
1

Better yet: do the European thing and give her a kiss on her cheek while hugging her.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 02:05 PM
4

You wouldn't get the fat chick. Parents don't want to trash their genetic line. They want to pick for you (and her parents pick for her) the best match possible that includes things like youth, beauty, status and all that. Indians and Pakistanis still do this. I have yet to see any of those guys paired with a pig. They get the cream of the crop from there.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 01:59 PM
4

That reminds me. There was a quote from the Roman Chronicler Tacitus, where he mentioned a tribe of Germans that were dumb enough to actually let the Queen rule of her own accord: Upon the Suiones, border the people Sitones; and, agreeing with them in all other things, differ from them in one, that here the sovereignty is exercised by a woman. So notoriously do they degenerate not only from a state of liberty, but even below a state of bondage. Here end the territories of the Suevians. Tacitus, …
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 01:26 PM
-5

To be honest, I'm all for going back to Marriage 0.5, when it was an arranged marriage. There is no need for men to game and no need for women to pull their shit. It was a controlled arrangement that was for the benefit of both and their respective families. I seriously doubt parents, with their wisdom, would make a poor choice for their children. This method got us through thousands of years. Now we are back to barbarity.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 01:12 PM
1

it may or may not put you at a disadvantage, but who cares? Don't worry about that. You need to work on confidence and building frame. Are you skinny? Get your ass to the gym. Get stylish "white guy" clothing. Learn some dance moves. My favorite is Latin dance. Women get instantly moist from Latin dance. Tell jokes. Be the fucking life of the party. Don't be afraid to approach women and touch them.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 12:58 AM
1

You're probably right. Though if we keep talking about race, it'll get our Indian bro down. He needs confidence.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 12:54 AM
11

This. It doesn't matter how much they destroy. They'll still think they are 100000% right and will blame failure on everyone else and will just want to radicalize more.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 11:29 PM
1

You are correct. I'm not entirely sure why. The people that have it the worst when dating are black women. I'll have to find the study...
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 11:27 PM
14

I'm not surprised. I love women. They're wonderful. They're just not leaders. At best they are cheerleaders, like Joan of Arc was a cheerleader (not a commander) and a source of inspiration.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 11:15 PM
3

Well, here's the deal. There are studies and evidence for people mostly sticking to their own kind, like in the range of 3rd to 6th cousin (average 4th cousin) when making friends and mating. They tend to stay "within the tribe", so to speak. In Mating In Making friends It's not impossible, clearly. But being an out-group member automatically brings your SMV way down.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 11:11 PM
1

Seems like someone beat me to it: https://8chan.co/trp/index.html
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 07:58 PM
1

I've been through this before. My argument was a verbal agreement had existed, as in almost all cases of joint leasing, that there was a 50/50 split on how we would come up with 100% of the rent every month. I also had text messages of the verbal agreement. Judge agreed and ordered her to pay me back.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 05:56 PM
2

Might be time for an 8chan /trp/ board.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 04:42 PM
4

I remember catcalling women all the time, from my car or on the street. None have ever taken it negatively... that was until suddenly Obama's election and re-election. Then women went batshit crazy.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 02:12 PM
4

Men have needs too. Imagine that.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 02:10 PM
3

Here's what I would do: toss her shit out in front of the door. Next when she tries to talk to me, I will give her a friendly reminder that she has half of the lease to pay. Should she at any moment fail to live up to her contractual obligation to pay half of said lease, I will kindly inform her that she will next see me in a court room. Further, she will pay half the lease for me to fuck girls in that apartment. I will make sure those ladies moan loud enough that she can hear their ecstasy. Edi…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 01:54 PM
4

The Greeks, Romans, and Vikings were right all along for making their democracies exclusive clubs.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 11:48 AM
20

I can't remember, other than my stupid teenage years, ever asking a girl if it is ok to put my penis in her vagina. It's always been one thing leads to another, or a look on her face. Just like they ruined marriage, they want to ruin the most basic primal act.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 10:05 PM
1

the short feminist explanation is "we’re told to" by society, slut shame, rape culture,etc Must be a world-wide conspiracy since the dawn of mankind. These people are worse tin-foilers than actual tin-foilers.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:14 PM
1

They've done a good job thus far. A generation of Autistic shut-ins afraid of women.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 11:47 AM
11

I thought Belle Knox looked pretty empowered with 10 gallons of jizz on her face.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:53 AM
1

Goddamnit, one of these days Feminists are going to shit up this country so much that I'm just going to bail for greener pastures. Russia comes to mind. They apparently don't take kindly to Feminists, as we saw with the Cossacks and Pussy Riot. My kind of place.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:32 AM
2

You can't have "chivalry" (courtly love) without the other aspects of real Chivalry. Those fuckers were ripped, veteran warriors of aristocratic background that were trained in fine art of cutting you to pieces with many different tools. They weren't white knight pussies. Be that aristocratic warrior in attitude and appearance. Then, and only then, pull the courtly love part of it.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:23 AM
1

I'm pretty sure you are correct that that is what she was supposed to poetically represent.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:10 AM
24

Cumslut Sasha Grey said the same thing, meanwhile gagging on 800 cocks. Yes, nothing more empowering than getting bukkake'd from dozens of strangers. Patriarchy watch out!
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:04 AM
4

Even then. What's to stop a gay man from using a bogus rape claim against his bf?
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 08:23 PM
15

I agree. “Courageous, untroubled, mocking and violent-that is what Wisdom wants us to be. Wisdom is a woman, and loves only a warrior.” -Friedrich Nietzsche
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 07:33 PM
12

I cannot think of anything more nihilistic than a consumerist culture where everything is disposable: men, women, babies, food -- everything. Feminism is like a gigantic super-massive black hole. It just sucks everything in and grinds it up.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 06:55 PM
25

One of the best books I ever read was Might Is Right by Ragnar Redbeard. It is the most red pilled book ever and feminists HATE it. Here's a quote: Virtue is rewarded in this world, remember. Natural law makes no false judgments. Its decisions are true and just, even when dreadful. The victor gets the gold and the land every time. He also gets the fairest maidens, the glory tributes. And — why should it be otherwise? Why should the delights of life go to failures and cowards? Why should the spoi…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 06:33 PM
8

Honestly, a good place to get laid is a gender studies/feminist class in college, if you can handle the complete absurdity of it all. The neat thing is, chicks think you are there to "educate yourself" so their guard is down, thinking you are actually interested in their nonsense. That sort of class is like a brothel.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 06:28 PM
1

Good article, man. Thanks for sharing!
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 06:26 PM
2

Meh, you're right. But hey, it's the internets and sometimes people's intentions don't get across so was as it would in RL.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 06:25 PM
50

I think we were meant to kill shit and not sit in a cubicle.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 05:36 PM
12

I just find it interesting that one of feminism's own has the shit tossed back in his face. It's the irony of it that is amusing.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 05:29 PM
7

That guy is truly scum. No honor. A guy who fucks his students, rebounds, and has even been accused of rape.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 03:12 PM
21

Reminds me of Hugo Schwyzer
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 02:30 PM
-1

Well, there are total douches like Hugo Schwyzer that claim they are getting all kinds of pussy, but Hugo could be one of those that plays that field to get the ladies to drop their guard by pretending to care about their bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 02:28 PM
1

Goddamnit. This is where I need to be at. This seems like a perfect symbiotic relationship, the way Nature intended.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 02:19 PM
11

She said: "so I never thought of it as rape." there you have it. Not rape.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 02:00 PM
47

Holy fuck. First we need contracts to get into marriage, now we need lawyers and contracts just to FUCK?!?! Fuck this gay earth.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 01:27 PM
2

Because it is in that age-range that cunt tastes the best.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 09:17 PM
1

Ever read Beowulf? That guy was fucking alpha. He killed Grendel with his bare hands, got the king's wife, got Grendel's mom, and killed the dragon.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 09:11 PM
2

The domination part definitely makes sense. It reminds me of the story of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra. I'm sure good ol' Cleo, being who she was, was used to getting all sorts of male interest. It wasn't until Julius came along that a man was able to make off with not just her undying loyalty, but he got a kid out of her and he made off with the whole of Egypt being added to the empire. LOL he was even able to parade her around as his personal whore in front of his wife and the entirety of Rome.…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 09:07 PM
5

The funny thing is they always say they want to be made love to, all sensitive and delicate, all romantic. I have never known one to say otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 02:10 PM
7

Now here is an interesting question: is cuckoldry meant to simulate this? In other words, while at face value it seems the woman is humiliating her man by getting gang-banged in front of him, but who is really being humiliated? It seems like the woman. She's behaving like trash at the whim of her man. And this also presents the man with being the "last one in wins" spermacide scenario.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 05:15 PM
37

I guess that's how the whore thing really works. It got scary at one point. She just kept on wanting more and even more degenerate things done to her. I was afraid she wanted to fuck my dog. The insane thing is her loyalty to me was almost cult-like. It was... 'worship'.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 05:00 PM
22

A lot of women actually have "rape" fantasies about being ravaged... and ravaged by random stranger alphas. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/201001/womens-rape-fantasies-how-common-what-do-they-mean http://www.care2.com/causes/rape-ranked-as-third-most-popular-sexual-fantasy-for-women.html
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 04:49 PM
27

It seems to me that women actually really enjoy being degraded sexually. The more degenerate, the better. Easing her in, of course. I wonder what in their evolutionary psychology causes that sort of arousal from being degraded?
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 04:11 PM
38

Honestly this shit works. One of my favorite conquests was a cute blonde Southern Belle. She was all proper. She thought sex was supposed to be about making love. And then I turned her into a sexual deviant by being a pig. Hair pulling, clothing ripping, etc. and at one point even jamming a remote control in her snatch. I even spit in her face once. She loved that shit. TREAT YOUR WOMAN LIKE A WHORE = SHE'LL BE BACK FOR MORE
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 03:59 PM
1

Using the milder, flippant forms have done well for me most of the time. Thanks for the input.
/r/askTRP23/09/14 07:41 PM
2

Cool. But very little phases me anymore.
/r/askTRP23/09/14 07:21 PM
2

It's only weird if you are still a virgin coming out of college.
/r/askTRP22/09/14 03:13 PM
1

3edgy5me
/r/askTRP20/09/14 03:52 PM
2

Sounds like a friendzone to me. Perhaps you came on too strong too early.
/r/askTRP20/09/14 03:48 PM
-5

You need to nip that shit in the bud. You need to remind him that he is beneath you and no disrespect will be tolerated. There is no equality among men.
/r/askTRP20/09/14 02:36 PM
5

Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, Czech Republic, Romania, Ukraianian women are great (too bad there is war there), Poland If you want to try to avoid visa-whores and gold diggers, try Hungary or Poland since their economies are much better.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 05:06 AM
1

no way around it. I blew it, not going to lie. It could be I choked because she does have some fine genetic material.
/r/askTRP19/09/14 10:47 PM
1

When the last time you got laid? Perhaps you could purchase some hookers/call girls that you consider "racially better", hate-fuck them and gain some confidence back. Sure, you paid for them, but who cares? Also, stop caring about what bitches think. Act aloof even if you aren't. That shit drives them crazy like HE DONT GIVE A FUCK OMG WET
/r/askTRP19/09/14 07:58 PM
1

Get swole.
/r/askTRP19/09/14 07:54 PM
1

This. The less you care, the more moist women get. Nature is fucked up that way.
/r/askTRP19/09/14 07:44 PM
1

Hmmm. I dunno. I would play up the teasing. That usually works for me. I had one Euro woman so pissed off at me because she was a little darker than your typical German and I would tell her she's a gypsy or Turk and not white. "What?!?! YES I AM WHITE!" "Ok but clearly you have some Arab or gypsy in you. Try not to steal my wallet." "#$%#$%#$*!!!!" ...then I got into her panties that night. I shattered her ego.
/r/askTRP19/09/14 06:39 PM
1

Get the fuck out now. Catholic women are better in the sack anyway. GOD WILLS IT! DEUS VULT
/r/askTRP19/09/14 06:25 PM
3

Yes, and mainly because your novelty value is higher. It'll be difficult to run out of interesting things to talk about given cultural differences.
/r/askTRP19/09/14 06:00 PM
7

What this^ man said. Also, do you realize how awesome Catholic women are? Irish, Italian, Polish, German... lots of hotties at my church. And already you have an ice-breaker: Bible study and scripture questions.
/r/askTRP19/09/14 05:37 PM
8

My favorite place: Central and Eastern Europe. They: *Take care of themselves (no legbeards, pitbeards, or cuntbeards) *are fun *are mother/wife material *love to and know how to please a man/fuck *don't mind being useful and doing some housework/raise kids/parenting *are interesting. Nothing gives me a boner like a woman who can talk about philosophy, science, politics, etc. in an intelligent way. Even if she doesn't give a shit, she knows how to pretend and that is enough for Boner. *are hones…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 03:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter