TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Niketi Archive

View 0 posts and 325 comments by Niketi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

It is rape without legal consent. That's why it's called statutory rape. For the same reason, a "lawful" killing isn't murder. The line we draw is entirely arbitrary, no question about it. But the line is the line. We either have it or we don't.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 05:50 PM
2

Thatcher hated feminists. She once said that she "owed nothing to women's lib." She was criticized for doing nothing to promote women in her government and retorted that she'd only be promoting people on merit. Say what you will about her, but she wanted nothing to do with this victim ideology and became the first female Prime Minister in British history.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 03:08 PM
3

The Norwegian Association for Women’s Rights (NKF) considers female conscription as a misunderstanding of the concept of gender equality and the intentions of the Law on Equality. Gender equality implies first and foremost that women and men should have the same human rights and fundamental freedoms. Women should be valued and allocated power and resources on equal terms with men. But women and men do not have to be alike or do the same things to be equal. How do you even debate this? This is wh…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 02:58 PM
9

I like to think it's like the five stages of grief. Denial - "Men don't have problems, men are the problem." Anger - "The idea of men's rights is misogynistic, shitlord!" Bargaining - "Feminism cares about men's rights too!" Depression - ??? Acceptance - Profit.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 02:43 PM
1

I think the only way to fix this is to hide the race and gender of the accused from the judges.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:11 AM
3

Isn't it interesting that the vast majority of convictions for revenge porn so far seem to be women? Is that anecdotal or did you see statistics for that somewhere?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 07:41 AM
5

Tl;dr is it's about trans bathroom problems. I really don't think most men give a shit. Women tend to be the ones overly protective of their bathrooms, and "uncomfortable" with trans women going in there. We're all used to standing shoulder to shoulder and pissing into a trough. The arrangement in the men's already sacrifices comfort for efficiency. That efficiency is all I think most men care about. If we have to share with women, the urinals will go and the whole business will end up taking fo…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:46 PM
2

And we'd be outraged of it was powerful feminists joking about abusing men, and treating the men at their parties like shit. Groups of women do this regularly on nights out.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:49 AM
2

Don't be so sensitive. It's a bunch of spoiled rich kids being obnoxious. For the sake of the college they should be disciplined for acting like a bunch of idiots and damaging property, but I don't buy into this idea of a misogynistic culture. Cambridge certainly does not have a rape problem, yet they have many drinking societies.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 12:25 AM
28

Whilst I don't disagree, I think this too is hugely skewed in favour of women. You only need to be moderately attractive as a woman to gain favor from hordes of men. The problem there, if there is one, is with men putting women on a pedestal - but it is certainly another example of "female privilege." As an average man it's possible to go through your entire life without being noticed because men are not put on a similar pedestal unless they're legitimately elite.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:32 PM
1

It seems like every week we're talking about another one of these cases in here. This is the real rape culture. The courts and the public (by-in-large) turn a blind eye to female sexual abuse, and the problem seems rampant. Be sure to complain to the attorney general to review the lenient sentence.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:23 PM
12

Yes, it's assault and battery. If you call the cops he will be arrested.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:09 PM
1

It's meant to be reserved for some truly apocalyptic shit like a world war. The draft won't be invoked again unless WW3 breaks out. Nobody is going to be drafted to fight another Iraq.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:07 PM
5

And I remember a time in which a rape charge was thrown based on what a woman was wearing or where she was Source on this? Rape used to be a capital crime. The only instance where I can remember it being handled unfairly was the marital rape exception, and that itself was nuanced by the old idea of marriage indicating automatic consent. She didn't say he was guilty, she said she believed him, and though I'm anti-feminist, women DO have rights. It is STILL incumbent on all of us to end ALL violen…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 03:29 PM
7

Why is it important that we believe anyone? Is she a personal friend of Stoya? No? Then why does her opinion matter? How does anyone's opinion impact the criminal justice process? Be rational, remain impartial and let the authorities do their jobs. You can have an opinion when the facts are established in a court of law. Anything before that point is completely meaningless because nobody knows what's actually going on.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 03:23 PM
8

We can't do much about women trying to avoid their responsibility. We could stipulate that a pregnancy occurring whilst in service results in forfeiture of the benefits you get after discharge. Women have complete control over their reproduction, this is not an unreasonable stipulation.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:25 PM
2

Perhaps we should work to see men and women as equally valuable by society. I don't like the feminist approach of reducing everyone to the lowest common denominator.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:22 PM
5

Unfortunately this is why it won't be happening any time soon. Unless single mother welfare is scrapped so women are actually solely responsible for the children they birth, as it was throughout most of history, men will never get equal reproductive rights. The best you can hope for is advancements in male contraceptives.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 06:18 PM
11

It's a collage of headlines from internet articles, not quotes from obscure books or studies behind paywalls. The creator found it on google himself.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 05:58 PM
1

In the meantime the judge was in a position where in order to stay consistent with previous case-law he couldn't have sent her to prison for very long. Assuming no previous offences the outcome isn't that surprising. What case law? This is the criteria judges should be following: Intent is the highest level of culpability (as opposed to recklessness or negligence). This women acted with intent and extensive premeditation, the judge noted it herself. 'You maliciously and deliberately targeted you…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:57 PM
1

We practice retributive justice. If you want that theory of punishment changed, fair enough. But we change it for everyone, not just women. And that's for the politicians, not the judges.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:29 PM
17

Conflating Feminism with equality is the biggest bait and switch in history. Do you believe in god? Yes? Then you're a Muslim. This is the same line of reasoning. You might be of a dozen other faiths or you might just believe in some obscure higher power with no attached doctrine. Feminism is an ideology which at its core is misandrist. It is not the same as women's rights. Women already have more rights than men in law.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:04 PM
4

Sorry, I didn't mean to come across antagonistically. Schools have been "feminized" since the 60's. I think if the issue was a matter of encouragement we'd be seeing some changes by now. The reality is, men and women have different goals, motivations and interests. The fact that STEM remains the only area of higher education men continue to dominate despite the harrowing rate of failure for men in general is a testament to these differences. The only reason this difference is considered a proble…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 08:25 PM
10

Do point out how boys are getting any form of encouragement whatsoever in our school system. Girls are encouraged endlessly, to the point where they have gender specific scholarships all expenses paid and a fast track into the top tech firms.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:32 PM
5

Equality at work.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:48 AM
9

Male-only exclusive spaces, such as fraternities or athletic teams, often serve as breeding grounds for the transmission of misogynistic attitudes that contribute to a sexual culture on campus that devalues women. Considering men are officially a huge minority on campus, I think male-only spaces should be specifically protected from bigots like this.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:22 PM
22

We never had a situation were men as a group lorded the vote over women. Very few men historically had any kind of political power. Men only gained the right to vote a few years before women did in most western countries - mainly because of the world wars. Women got an unqualified right to vote, whilst men had to accept the burden of conscription which continues to this day in many places.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 12:01 PM
8

Really encouraging to see such a huge conversation going on in those comments. More people are realizing that their experiences with violent women just do not fit into the feminist model they were taught.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:50 AM
2

Equality would be a step down for women.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:49 AM
11

Time to complain to the attorney general again. It feels like I'm doing this for a new case every day.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 02:55 PM
11

Well that rules me out as a sperm donor for life.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 02:50 PM
2

Because this is an industry. If the imaginary problems feminism purports to combat are ever fixed, they have no reason to exist. The victimhood industry needs victims. So they have to keep expanding on the definition of rape and sexual assault to create more victims, leading to more government funding, and more jobs for all the women's studies majors.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:58 AM
49

The men would turn prison into a pretty cool place, the women would want in and inevitably ruin it.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:20 AM
6

The title says nothing about genocides?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:32 PM
1

Nobody, not even feminists, feel we should abolish incarceration entirely. Who would be happy about allowing serial killers or serial rapists loose on society with little more than community service and rehabilitation therapy?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:15 PM
3

It was out of less than 1000.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:13 PM
8

You joke about this, but there is serious discussion going on in legal academics about rape by deception. The introduction of proper male contraceptives which are invisible and outside the control of women will inevitably tip the scales here. I honestly would not be surprised to see withholding this information becoming a crime (for men only of course).
/r/TheRedPill26/11/15 07:12 PM
4

I wish these women would put all this effort into improving the girl scouts rather than invading the boy scouts and inevitably ruining it.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 04:40 PM
88

Almost 150 people in that poll think we should stop incarcerating women? This is getting utterly ridiculous. Literally every argument that article makes can be applied to men, and it affects men to a much greater extent. Sexism does not get more blatant than this.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:40 AM
1

How about we just give people equal rights?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 01:27 PM
2

This is the inherent difficulty in proving rapes of this nature. The point I was making is that one must be so severely intoxicated that they are incapacitated to qualify as rape. The idea that any consumption of alcohol/drugs negates consent is a feminist myth, a myth they're teaching in these classes. It doesn't even matter if you're extremely drunk and consent - only that you're so drunk that you physically cannot consent.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 12:59 PM
1

I wasn't talking abstractly, I'm talking practically. I don't see how socialism handles the situation I described. Who decides what the economic and scientific benefit of the community is? I thought we were talking about popular vote? The popular vote won't always be congruent with the benefit of the community. Anyway thanks for talking the time to discuss this with me. I remain unconvinced but I've learned more about Socialism for it.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 10:53 AM
1

There is no good economic or scientific reason to outlaw the production of drugs. If the production capacity exists, it will be utilized, this is a very basic tenant of socialism. But how is this compatible with the idea of direct democracy? If everyone votes to outlaw say cocaine, yet cocaine continues to be manufactured, then what's the point of the vote in the first place? Just because something is unreasonable or unscientific, doesn't mean people won't vote for it. There seems to be no limit…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 10:16 AM
1

Within a socialist community victimless crimes surrounding drugs and prostitution, etc would not be illegal. I don't understand how this can be true under a direct democracy. What's stopping a popular vote to outlaw something? Is a constitution in place to limit what can and cannot be legislated by the collective vote? Let's assume then, to better frame your question, for some reason an outside force is threatening the lives of the socialist community. A military from a foreign land, for example…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:46 AM
1

These officers of the law are not interested in victimless crimes, they are not militarized, and they are not used as a force by the ruling elite to exploit and oppress the worker. So what does the community do against a militant criminal situation, like a drug cartel? Suppose the community votes to keep certain substances illegal, like say cocaine, because of its hugely detrimental effect on the stability of the community. This creates a violent black market to supply the demand, as we see toda…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 08:32 AM
1

Where does the detective derive his powers of arrest? Or any other police powers necessary to investigate me? Does this not simply make him what you call a "law enforcing elite class"? It all sounds as idealistic and far-fetched as libertarianism if you ask me. Too much faith placed in the goodness of human nature.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:55 AM
8

The law on rape isn't unjust. Universities run by feminist zealots just have a much lower standards than the legal system. Whatever psychology thinks it knows about consent is completely irrelevant to what the law actually says. If, through drink or for any other reason, A has temporarily lost her capacity to choose whether to have sex, she is not consenting. If, in that event, intercourse takes place, that would be rape. The mere fact that A had consumed excessive amounts of alcohol and cannabi…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:29 AM
1

So in this society if I murder somebody, who investigates the crime and brings me to justice? Or are you just counting on people not murdering each other? Without law enforcement we're back to the honor system.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:11 AM
2

Decisions that need to be made are made collectively where 1 person is 1 vote. Every person has their say. Yes but you must have some kind of legal system, which means you'll need someone to enforce and apply the laws. That's a police force and a judiciary right there - one of the three wings of government. Who then implements and enforces whatever the collective votes into law? That's your executive branch. Your legislature is just hugely expanded to encompass the entire population, rather than…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 11:21 AM
244

It's possible because fathers have no rights to their children. Women have absolute dominion over children and reproduction, and it's written into law. The law in Utah gives this woman the power to decide she doesn't want the baby and that she doesn't want him to have the baby, so she can send it off to live with strangers against his will. This is why the MRM exists.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 10:54 AM
40

I was wondering when this idea of just closing down women's prisons and awarding them community service for whatever crimes they commit would come to America. It's the final evolution of the pussy pass.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 11:28 AM
6

I imagine it would be an especially terrible experience to be a transgender woman in a men's prison. I don't imagine the sort of people she was locked up with were sensitive to her particular circumstances, nor do I imagine they'd be understanding of someone dressing and acting very feminine in there. Perhaps if unsuitable for women's prisons, they should be given the option of custody in secure psychiatric institutions. I'd only extend this courtesy to criminals on the basis that it's unrealist…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:12 PM
3

A contract is a contract. All of this could be avoided by simply permitting men to have equal reproductive rights to women. If this man could surrender all rights and obligations (read child support) to these embryos, he might well have allowed her to have her way. As it stands, he can't do that and would risk being on the hook for the next 18 years for children he does not want. He's lucky he got to decide for himself in this instance. This is a power most men never get to wield.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:44 PM
3

It's great progress if we've got committees in Parliament examining and discussing this. Family law has been rampantly misandrist for far too long and is one of the biggest causes of misery in many men's lives. The unfairness of the current system simply cannot be defended by anyone purporting to support gender equality. The feminists will come out of the woodwork to cry misogyny at the very idea of fair treatment for men in the family courts; but as we've seen so often, their hysterical and rid…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:23 PM
6

I've traveled to many Muslim countries in my day (I'm required to for work), and what many westerners fail to realize is that "radical" is a relative term. What you and I would consider radical is probably congruent. What's considered "moderate" in Saudi Arabia would very much be radical to you and I. Punishing a thief with amputation is a pretty radical notion to a westerner; in the Islamic world it's the norm. Blasphemy or apostasy being a capital punishment is also fairly radical to us, but i…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/15 10:10 AM
3

You can replace it with a module called "Women in Politics," sparing students from the ideological indoctrination. Feminism is a corrupted ideology at its core. Patriarchy theory, toxic masculinity - all of these things are central tenants of the ideology which serve no useful purpose.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:15 AM
2

I think custodial sentences for this kind of thing isn't fair for either unless it's actual (as opposed to statutory) rape/sexual assault. But I'm not in a position to determine sentencing, I'm not a judge. I only want consistency in their sentencing.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:57 AM
2

Sure, but there's still room within the law for the judge to give leniency, based on what the judge feels is correct. The judge ruled, and their ruling was overturned as too lenient because there was angry letters about it to other courts. The problem is judges are, as a matter of routine, sentencing men to 63% harsher sentences for the same crimes. This is larger than any racial discrepancy or any other discrepancy in criminal sentencing. If judges decide on a certain punishment for a certain c…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:18 AM
10

Soccer players rolling around is just an unfortunate part of the game. Win at all costs mentality. Soldiers faking injuries are purely motivated by self-preservation. It's cowardice (provided we're talking about a volunteer army) but perfectly understandable behavior. What we're seeing here is the cult of victimhood feminism has fostered in western women, and it's often employed malevolently.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:25 AM
1

Yes and the "male" role is hugely discriminated against. A few women being affected doesn't change that fact. What's more, there are MANY more divorced women out there who earn more than their ex husbands, these women are often not railroaded by alimony as reflected by the 3% figure. Men are as a matter of course. Our position is simply that this practice should be abolished.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:02 PM
2

The intention was to draw attention to some of the issues men tell us they encounter and to follow this up by highlighting in particular the availability of mental health and welfare support which we know men are sometimes reluctant to access. The Equality and Diversity Committee is clear that the main focus of gender equality work should continue to be on the inequalities faced by women, and in particular the under-representation of women in the professoriate and senior management. This is all …
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:58 AM
2

This is the law, they made it the law. We only want it applied equally.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:42 AM
4

Divorce is rigged against men. As this article points out, 3% of all alimony recipients are men. These women are a tiny minority walking in the shoes of the silent 97%. Perhaps you should take your own advice and stop seeing women as a single unified entity. This tiny minority has just had a taste of life on the other side of the marriage spectrum and, unsurprisingly, realized it's complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:33 AM
11

It's "disruptive to family". It's not totally banned, you just need a court order to obtain one.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 05:38 AM
2

There are certain international agreements which can enforce child support and alimony across boarders. You'd basically have to leave the feminist west to escape it.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 05:36 AM
2

The person I knew best who would drink a bottle of bleach Are you sure? Do you know what drinking even the standard 5% concentration of sodium hypochlorite found in household bleach would do to you? Even if she survived it, embarrassment would be low on her list of concerns.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 03:54 AM
8

A hit with a .22 is always better than a miss with a .50 cal.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/15 06:10 PM
5

I'm getting tired of their favorite buzzword "empowering." What exactly does a dildo empower you to do?
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:51 PM
5

I find this to be a well reasoned argument, but as he (she?) states himself in his conclusion: Finally, the priorities of funding agencies are not simply the number of people dying from a particular condition. The funding landscape is complex, designed around current advances, where the best researchers are located, the best proposals for funding, political will, and a host of other variables. This "political will" is sort of the point we are contesting. The "politics" dictate that female ailmen…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:42 PM
27

Feminism is just a buzzword, a label. Women can come out in droves distancing themselves from a label. PR is what they do best. But will they be equally willing to undo the damage feminism has done on their behalf over the decades? Will they give up all those legal privileges they enjoy over men? Will they agree to tone down the one sided state funding? I think not. Women denouncing feminism is about as significant as a soldier hanging up his rifle after his enemy lies devastated.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/15 07:55 AM
2

What about transsexuals? Legally obligate them to disclose their gender history, or face rape charges? It seems like dangerous ground to me.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:36 AM
4

This is actually a brilliant document, but member states would need to ratify it. It's pretty much an MRA manifesto on parental rights. Sadly, I just can't see this being ratified by anyone on a national level, not with Feminist thinking dominating political thought. I'm going to send this to some media outlets in the hope they write articles about it at least. Maybe that'll start a conversation about why this should be ratified at least. Most reasonable people would agree with everything in her…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:06 AM
15

Her work in this area is guided by audience studies, theories of gender and sexuality, and media literacy. Current research projects involve 50 Shades of Grey readers, the impact of social media in fans’ relationship with Lady Gaga, masculinity and male fans, messages about class and food in reality television programming, and messages about work in children's television programs. Research Interests: Media audiences and fans; Gender, race, class and sexuality in popular culture; Television analy…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:23 AM
17

People who haven't got time for this kind of nonsense just won't work for companies like Vox. The problem for Vox is, those kinds of people are typically the sort that will actually make you money. They're within their rights to run their company however they choose. If they're choosing to bankrupt themselves, so be it.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:21 PM
1

I was being facetious. The one sided incentives and funding is what needs to go completely.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:52 PM
1

Perhaps it might be time to get rid of all those scholarships and educational incentives for women? Perhaps it might be time for a little affirmative action in the other direction? Or perhaps women will need to learn that you can't have your cake and eat it. You can't marry up when you've pushed your dating pool out to take the spots for yourselves. I'm really interested to see what happens when the student debt bubble bursts with young women overwhelmingly bearing the brunt of that mess. If we …
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:29 PM
30

This archaic bullshit needs to be abolished.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:00 PM
4

The police shooting rate you have in the US is disgustingly high in general. Police officers in England and Wales opened fire just five times for the year 2011/12. Out of these incidents, two people were killed. Some years nobody is killed by police at all. The statistics make it look like an authoritarian police state waging war on its own citizenry.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:23 PM
5

I'm not going to criticize an obviously good thing. But we have suicide hotlines and support groups already. Granted, not geared to men, but they exist. To address the appalling suicide rates you need to look at why these men are killing themselves and making some serious societal reforms. A man living with crushing debts to his ex-wife who cannot see his children doesn't need to talk about it. He needs family law reform.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:48 PM
23

What does all this nonsense about "safety" even mean? Their argument is that a group of men getting together to discuss men's issues will inevitably devolve into a microcosm of the neolithic period. It's beyond bigoted. The safety of women and feminist groups on campus was raised over the group’s association with the Canadian Association for Equality (CAFE), a controversial men’s rights group. The organization has been met with backlash on campus, and required security presence at a few events l…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:27 PM
1

I hope they bankrupt the magazine. It'll make the press think twice before getting on board with this kind of crazy shit again without fact checking.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:55 PM
122

Attacks against the concept of freedom of expression should be an expulsion level offense at a place like Yale. It attacks the very essence of what a University stands for. If you can't understand that, you don't belong at Yale.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/15 01:22 AM
4

I'd agree, but lawyers gonna lawyer. The problem is that this argument is even accepted as valid by the judges. The fact that it actually works means lawyers will exploit it. Judges should be shutting it down.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:51 PM
0

Man is bad: imprison him! men are bed! Woman is bad: oh, she's poorly. Not all women are like that. It's caused by society or her parents or or or. Endless excuses for women. Don't put words into my mouth please. Sure she's got a psychological issue. Let's call it hypergamous greedy bitch syndrome. AWALT absolutely applies to children. Women do not sacrifice as much for their children as men do. And they manage to get a healthy slice of profit alimony into the bargain. Hypergamy literally means …
/r/TheRedPill09/11/15 08:33 PM
2

It isn't the same at all. Women don't teach their sons to be women. They teach them to be how they believe men should be. They believe these things because they don't understand much about masculinity, or even what they really find attractive in men themselves. It's teaching from ignorance.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/15 08:33 PM
37

Your point of view undermines everything about assault and battery laws on every level. Any form of touching can constitute a battery. Any form of sexual touching can constitute a sexual assault. Your ability to "get away" has nothing to do with it. It's frankly preposterous. Why should this man have to run away from these women? You seem to believe that because he's a significantly larger man, it isn't an issue because he couldn't possibly feel threatened. This is a sexist presumption. His only…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:03 PM
42

You're telling me if two men were grabbing and groping a woman like that in a convenience store despite her obvious protests - you'd be totally okay with that?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:44 PM
55

I'm just happy the police are actually taking it seriously.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:29 PM
4

God help that country if she gets into office.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:02 AM
31

You can't blame a woman for failing to teach a boy how to be a man. She isn't a man, it shouldn't be her job. You can blame a woman for depriving her son of access to his father, thereby causing this very problem, if that is the case.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 09:25 PM
10

Just beware of common law marriage, paternity fraud and unwanted pregnancy itself. Think of it this way. We as men consent to fatherhood every time we have sex with a woman. That consent is presumed regardless of what you say or what precautions you take. You could have a (botched) vasectomy and a contract with the woman explicitly stating you do not want children, and if she gets pregnant, you're on the hook for it. You consented to it by virtue of having sex alone. This is the level of absurdi…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:14 PM
41

I think your mother suffers from some sort of legitimate psychological issue. AWALT doesn't usually apply to children. Women's love for their children is a different matter entirely. Mothers are usually the one woman you can actually trust, unless of course they're psychologically broken. If women loved their men like they loved their children, the world would be a pretty wonderful place.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 07:43 PM
5

No, that would be illogical. It would turn hospitals in Jerry Springer shows, they would need security and counselling services on site. Hospitals already do. It would be ridiculous, there would be divorces, fights and an awful atmosphere for the child to be born into. A sensible solution is free, reliable bc for men. I agree free, reliable BC for men is also hugely important. But DNA testing should also be a requirement to establish paternity. DNA is already tested at birth routinely to test fo…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:33 PM
1

Let them. These media platforms will choke and die as new ones which actually cater to the market pop up and overtake them. The beauty of the internet means almost anyone can start a news outlet these days. You don't need an industrial printing press or a TV station, just a domain name and the time to do it.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 06:26 AM
33

You guys love decrying censorship when it suits you and you're happy to censor others when it doesn't. No, we don't. We're not all of the same political ideology, but we generally oppose censorship here, even when it's something we disagree with. If you spent 5 minutes browsing relevant threads here you'd know that. Firstly, this assumes that there is zero cross-over between the FemSoc and the Journalism students Why does that matter? If you don't agree with him, you don't have to go. Better yet…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 06:04 AM
3

In England, touching is now assault and touching-that-leaves-a-mark is Grievous Bodily Harm (information from the police after I called them). That's how low the barrier is there. Battery has always only required nothing but a touch. "any intentional [or reckless] touching of another person without the consent of that person and without lawful excuse. It need not necessarily be hostile, rude, or aggressive.” Faulkner v Talbot [1981] 3 All ER 468 Consent is a lawful excuse. If you touch a friend'…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/15 08:14 PM
6

God damn it. Now I have to change provider. I hope they give me one of those surveys so I can tell them why.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 07:35 PM
7

This is the crux of feminist thinking. Hypoagency. They simply have no grasp of the concept of agency. They do not believe women should have accountability for their own choices or actions in life. Thus, they cannot discern the difference between being persuaded into making a (sometimes wrong) choice, and being deprived of that choice altogether. There's a reason one is a crime, and the other is called marketing. This resembles the self-awareness of a toddler.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 04:40 AM
5

I think this woman's mind has just been blown. For decades, continuing to this very day, feminists have just "presumed to know" what masculinity is. They've written libraries of literature based on their flawed presumption. They've constructed their entire false ideology around this false assumption. Turns out conventional wisdom had something to it after all. Don't make assumptions about things you don't understand.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 03:13 AM
5

I thought the Labour party was bad in the Blair era. Now I just feel sorry for this sad state of affairs.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 03:07 AM
1

In cases like that nobody would be uncouth enough to offer such comments without being called out as a complete asshole. Just as nobody (except perhaps complete assholes) does it in cases of actual violent stranger rapes. No I certainly wouldn't let such idiotic comments affect my psyche, because this sort of thing only makes you feel bad when it's true. If I forgot my milk and I'm blindly attacked, I'm just really unfortunate. If I decide to get drunk and pass out on the sidewalk after retrievi…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:28 PM
3

The difference in our attitudes is that where you see victim blaming, I see personal responsibility. This isn't a zero sum game. If the victim is being blamed only for their own stupidity, lack of self awareness or lack of personal responsibility. The attacker is being blamed for the actual crime.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:07 PM
3

I can find you articles of people being attacked by a lion in a zoo with people proclaiming: "Asking for it." I don't know what part of this you don't understand. You're not going to change this element of the human psyche. Personal responsibility and accountability are pillars of our autonomy. Nobody is responsible for being victimised, but they are responsible for their own safety. People will always point out the stupidity of walking down dark alleys whilst wearing a Rolex if you're robbed. I…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:01 PM
3

Men and women are being treated the same. The police treatment is the same. The public treatment is the same. The fact that they're gay is irrelevant. Feminism is in this instance advocating for sexism in favour of women. This is a problem for Men's Rights. Edit: They're not being blamed in either instance. Nobody is saying anybody other than the rapist/serial killer is ultimately at fault for raping/killing in the first place. They're saying as an addendum, take responsibility for your own safe…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:47 PM
3

I think if you care to peruse the comments on those articles, you'll see it's exactly the same. It's often attributed to their culture of promiscuity. Again, because people have this sense of personal responsibility. The repercussions of using a sleepy dating app to find casual sex- of course it's asking for trouble. This could happen to any one man or woman who meet through dating sites, meet up where there are other people around. Urge to have sex, whether one is gay or not, leads men and wome…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:20 PM
3

Except this particular police practice has nothing to do with unconscious biases or sexism. This example is of gay men being targeted through a dating app: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2804765/Gay-man-invited-robber-house-meeting-dating-app-Grindr-mugged-electric-cattle-prod.html Is this victim blaming? Or are they just warning gay men to beware of targeted crime? Again after a series of gay men were targeted by a serial killer: https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1290&dat=19930620…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:00 PM
3

From the article: Nobody is really expecting women in Clapham to venture out only in groups of three, armed with rape alarms and baseball bats. So what is the impact of issuing such advice? It starts to suggest to the general public that, specifically in cases of sexual assault, victims should be taking responsibility for their own safety and, implicitly, may be partly to blame if they are attacked. This is what I'm laughing at. Yes, adult human beings are expected to be responsible for their ow…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:37 PM
2

Suppose the situation were reversed and men's safety was treated with special consideration over women. What do you suppose feminism's response would be to that? That's why it's important. The fact that feminists some how take offense to this special consideration is the part that isn't important at all. We just like laughing at how ridiculous it is.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:22 PM
4

Wouldn't it be better if mens rights stopped putting effort into arguing for it to remain treated differently? I think you fundamentally misunderstand what we're arguing.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:15 PM
5

How would it negatively effect you or mens rights? Nobody is saying it would. I think it would negatively affect society by lowering the standard of policing considerably. Like I said, if there was a killer targeting lone men in my local area, I'd expect the police to warn me about it so I could take precautions to protect myself until the threat was apprehended. Our problem with the way violence against men is treated is that it isn't taken seriously enough. We don't want to lower the bar for w…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:09 PM
2

You'd prefer the police didn't warn women about this rapist? Are you insinuating it's preferable for more women to potentially be raped than to risk making women feel like they're being "victim blamed?" If there was a serial killer on the loose who only targeted men walking alone at night, I'm fairly sure the police would issue a similar warning because it's part of their job. We just don't see these situations because men are a much harder target for lone psychopaths.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:56 PM
4

This case is also an extreme exception. If you cared to read the first paragraph of the article, you'd see as much. “Women warned after Gainsborough assault.” “Police warn women walking alone after riverside incident.” “Serial sex attacker strikes again as ninth victim is assaulted and police warn women to be on their guard.” “Police issue warning to women not to walk or travel alone after woman grabbed in latest incident.” “Fugitive rapist: women urged not to walk alone as chilling footage at M…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:49 PM
2

Of course. Never talk to the police without a lawyer.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:31 PM
1

Our system of open justice means you can physically go and sit in the courtroom and watch this unfold in person if you're so inclined. He's not her defense attorney breaking privilege.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:30 PM
6

The point is that it is a crime because people like her lobbied the government to make it a crime. The precedent this sets is that it's only a crime for white men. If women or any other "special interest group" break this law, they get a pass. We can all agree that the law itself is ridiculous and shouldn't exist. But it does exist, and the result today shows it only exists for one group of people.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:34 PM
4

The people saying that they cannot apply affirmative action to help men here are NOT feminists, they're just people in the Australian government who are talking about already-existing Australian law. The law they're referring to permits discrimination in favour of women, but it does not permit it in favour of men. Which particular political lobbyist group with a special interest in gender politics do you suppose was behind that? Whose idea do you think it was to allow special scholarships for wo…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:07 PM
11

It sounds bad, but if you were the cop investigating this how would you proceed? There was no logical motive for the attack, and nobody melts somebody's face with acid over nothing. Police will dig into the lives of murder victims just the same. I don't think they're implying the victim is at fault for being dead, they're just trying to figure out why they ended up dead.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:11 PM
10

When a wife has left a job to care for children and handicapped her earning ability, it is grossly inequitable to give the substantially less income post-divorce than the man she previously supported with her homemaking and child care services. When the marriage is over, the obligation to support the wife should also be over. If the mother cannot afford to take care of the child, while the father can; it's in the best interests of the child to live with the father. There is no rational basis to …
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:43 PM
2

I kinda hope they do try to censor the internet. Buy some stocks in VPN companies. Before long, everyone will have a VPN subscription as standard and the government will be dealing with the headache of a country full of encrypted communications. As someone equally concerned with privacy rights, this would make my day.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:33 PM
10

We focus on actual legal discrepancies in rights. Such as parenting rights, or equality in justice, or equality in the draft. Feminists are pulling shit like this. How exactly are we advocating hate? We have new examples of feminist hatred posted here every day. Hate attributed to the MRM is always a red herring or a strawman. Like when they label mass shooters MRAs. We point to examples of feminist bigotry perpetrated by multi-million dollar feminist organizations endorsed by the United States …
/r/MensRights31/10/15 11:47 PM
31

There's a particular distinction here. Gays are an overtly oppressed group of people. They're subject to very real threats of violence even in civilized western cultures. I'm a straight man, and I've only visited gay bars on a few occasions as a guest of a gay friend; but I can fully appreciate the particular necessity for this group of people to have a "safe space." The fact that straight women are invading and hijacking these spaces en mass is, in my opinion, bordering on the deplorable. Your …
/r/MensRights31/10/15 11:38 PM
55

I'd recommend reading the article, it's an interesting account. Sounds a lot like the systematic destruction of traditionally heterosexual male spaces. I don't know why gays thought they'd be immune to the consequences when they signed a deal with this particular devil.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:33 PM
2

You'd have a point if you substituted "society" for "women." Men certainly don't value destructive behavior in other men. Civilization would not exist if that were the case. Even some of the most "evil" of predominantly male activities one can imagine, like organized crime, is constructive in nature (making profit). So this ideology should be entirely focused on women's standards for men, if this were the case. In what way is "animalism" valued? Competitive sports, like what Ronda is herself fam…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:50 PM
8

I wonder if you can pay in wildly volatile penny stocks.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:11 PM
1

Well I can't imagine someone looking like that surviving long locked up inside a cage with our most dangerous demographics without being raped. Perhaps this will finally make people take the real rape culture which exists within our society seriously. Perhaps prisons should no longer be gender segregated at all, but separated by seriousness of crime. Non-violent offenders have no business being incarcerated with violent offenders. In fact they have no business being incarcerated at all.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:05 PM
1

The only difference is, no man in this day and age is socialized to think that it's a woman's obligation to provide more than a modicum of enthusiastic participation. If it doesn't lead to a rape accusation I think most of us can agree to call it a win.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:23 PM
3

Without a monopoly on force tempered by the rule of law you're left with anarchy. Do you really find the idea of private armies roaming the streets imposing their particular brand of justice upon your life appealing? Would you prefer a local warlord to your local governor? It's essentially a throwback to feudalism. We have a big enough problem with oligarchs amassing too much economic and political power in the current system. Why would anyone want to open the door to absolute power for these pe…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:18 PM
5

The theme to which you refer is that 'patriarchy theory' is an ever illusive intangible concept which means whatever its proponents need it to mean at any given time. It's an intellectual chameleon, but it always describes power structures built by men to “oppress” women. Feminism did little to "free" women from any forms of oppression described in “patriarchy theory”. Technological advancement perpetrated by men freed women from the oppression of their own biology. Feminists confuse gender role…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:39 PM
5

It does when it's used as a description of a machinery of oppression, which is of course the crux of patriarchy theory. To accept this premise one must also accept that the oppressors also (and to a largely greater degree) oppress themselves. This is both irrational and at odds with all other examples of systematic oppression throughout history.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:23 PM
3

It would indicate that the term 'patriarchy' is a misnomer if men occupy both extremes of the social hierarchy. Especially when men are disproportionately burdened and indeed oppressed when compared to women in such a social order.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:01 PM
3

I've been reading these recent outrage articles and the universities seem to adopt the policy of referring serious criminal complaints to the police. That's exactly what they should be doing. These people seem to be advocating for kangaroo courts.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 01:36 PM
6

It never was simply a synonym for equality. It also never was interchangeable with "Women's Rights Advocates." It is and always has been an ideology, a particularly toxic ideology at that. The infamous (and ingenious) conflation of feminist ideology with the concept of equality follows the same flawed logic as saying that if you believe in God, you must be a Christian. You can clearly believe in a god without subscribing to any particular ideology. Feminism's greatest achievement was in convinci…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 08:14 AM
9

This is from the MRA thread on this article: SSH report That's a full .pdf report on street harassment, and I linked directly to it rather than send you to the hosting site because the site has cherry picked data out of that document to support their positions and it's more honest to just read the report directly. If you look at the graph on page 17, where it talks about incidence rates, you'll see that of those that experienced street harassment, only 5-6% experienced it regularly. Virtually ev…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 04:12 AM
7

This is an excellent article. UCLA gender studies professor Dr. Michelle Erai: I think the discomfort from most feminists comes from the idea of consent because in the club scene there’s a lot of alcohol. That’s where informed consent comes in. You should know you’re participating. You know you can say no, and there should be no negative repercussions from not participating. Because of alcohol and other substances consent gets a little fuzzy. And between that and then the distance between the se…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:11 PM
7

Intoxicated sex is not rape. Not even close. Incapacitation is the word used in the law. A glass of wine can intoxicate you. Incapacitation involves the territory of unconsciousness or extreme sedation. To be so severely intoxicated that you are incapable of consenting. It is your right to become so badly intoxicated, and in such a state nobody deserves to be raped. It's rightly criminal. But intoxicated consent is still consent, even if the consenting party regrets it in the morning. Even if th…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:28 PM
7

Or we go back to sex segregated schools.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 10:58 AM
6

I have serious doubts that any of this ever even happened. Who is seriously going on a prima facie pleasant date, only to write a 400 word poetic text message to the other party the next day emphasising all their great personal qualities but explicitly disqualifying them as a sexual partner because of their weight? Does this really sound plausible as a male response to these circumstances? I could believe a man insulting her weight and leaving immediately. I could even believe a man insulting he…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:39 AM
2

A false accusation amounts to the use of the police as a proxy for violence against the victim. Perpetrators should therefore be held accountable for everything the police do to the victim in reliance of the lie. False imprisonment, assault and battery, kidnapping and perjury should be standard charges brought in cases like this. I see no difference between me hiring a gang of goons to do this to someone, and a woman lying to the police to make them do the same. I also feel conviction should ear…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:24 PM
1

They usually saw at your neck with a combat knife. It's a particularly brutal way to die. State beheadings like the Saudi's do are quick and clean because they're done with heavy swords or axes in one stroke.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 11:31 AM
40

If she's using the police as a proxy for violence against an innocent man, I see no reason why she shouldn't be accountable for everything they do to the victim in reliance of this lie. Charges for (in this case attempted) false imprisonment and kidnapping would be appropriate, which when combined with perjury would add up to a morally adequate custodial sentence. This is before even considering the civil liability.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:07 PM
28

The change perhaps has something to do with more women assuming the traditional roles of men. Increases in "social pressure to conform or excel" sounds familiar. The world isn't becoming more hostile to women. The world has always been hostile, and more women would seem to be sharing the burden.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 01:01 PM
3

It's indistinguishable from the typical feminist rhetoric about college campuses if you ask me. A middle class white woman in an Ivy League school clearly has it worse than these women in the new caliphate. This is the unfortunate implication of the rape culture meme.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:53 AM
7

How is the state senate passing laws which only apply to colleges? It sounds like college campuses are a country unto themselves.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 05:42 PM
18

If he had actually raped her, would you want him to escape punishment for being 15?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:18 PM
8

Debunking Feminist theory is a part of what we do because Feminist theory dominates the current discussion on gender relations. While I am personally more concerned with the legal side of the problem, I understand why we must also address the social and cultural aspects. In this case, demonstrating that "slut shaming" is really more of a female problem undermines the idea that masculinity is in some way broken or "toxic" and needs to be forcibly changed.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:25 PM
1

The problem could be easily solved by automatically giving custody to fathers. If both parents are criminal, they probably shouldn't be raising a kid at all.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:26 PM
0

Truly compelling argument.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:03 AM
0

To accept this concept of "rape by deception" you must first accept the premise that women's bodies are a commodity, or property as it were. You're using an analogy of fraud. It can therefore only apply if women are in fact a form of property and can be defrauded out of sex.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:15 PM
5

It doesn't say that, it says only men can rape because you need a penis to rape. Men and women can both be raped. This was tried as rape.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:06 PM
7

Legal academic journals are littered with Feminist Jurisprudence, especially in the criminal law on rape and sexual assault (family law is also unsurprisingly a favourite). Most people aren't exposed to this, but anyone who has been through law school will at least be aware of the debates that have been going on in this area for decades now. They've been working on this for a long time, eventually the ideas born from these academic debates manifest in things like the model penal code.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:09 PM
5

I make sure that I'm never alone with a woman at work too. It's not even something I consciously do any more. It's like making sure you don't tread on a rattle snake.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 06:46 AM
12

Given the option, I and every man I know would probably jump on the opportunity to be a "house husband" if a woman were willing to support us. You can get a house in order in a couple of hours. Kids are at school for 9 hours a day. Imagine what you could do with around 9 hours to yourself a day. Who seriously prefers giving most of their life up to labour? Most men don't do it because working isn't an option for us like it is for women, it's mandatory.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:19 PM
2

Most of it really isn't. It's no more exploitation than your employer making money off your labour. You could try to freelance, but there are advantages to being employed. 100% of the problems with prostitution, just like the drug trade, come from it being illegal. The illegality means people who are already criminals have to self regulate their industry, and that inevitably leads to exploitation and violence. In countries like Holland where it's completely legal, it operates like any other indu…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:55 AM
21

As I recall, Clarice Starling was a feminist in the movie. A female FBI agent with a chip on her shoulder and something to prove. Lector stripped all that bravado away and revealed the scared little girl underneath. It didn't dance around the issue at all. She was a great character because she was portrayed as a real contemporary woman, warts and all.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 06:03 PM
6

I think I saw this video on this sub a while ago. Well worth a watch on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc Never, ever talk to the cops. Especially if you're innocent.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 11:06 PM
1

DV laws have nothing to do with gender. I really beg to differ. Please go and read at least the wiki entry on the Duluth Model. As of 2006, the Duluth Model is the most common batterer intervention program used in the United States.[2] It is based in feminist theory positing that "domestic violence is the result of patriarchal ideology in which men are encouraged and expected to control their partners". According to the Duluth Model, "women and children are vulnerable to violence because of thei…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:40 PM
3

Our next criticism: TRP advice causes heart disease.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 11:18 PM
0

It's done all the time. It's abuse of the equitable doctrine of promissory estoppel.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:25 PM
8

I don't personally see the social scourge of single motherhood as something contributing much value. I also don't see much evidence of social pressure encouraging this scourge. Motherhood and family had extremely high value in traditional thought, I'd even say it was sacred. It was in fact the primary reason men laboured to support women. Feminism has done everything possible to devalue it.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 12:47 AM
2

This is called a "measure having equivalent (discriminatory) effect." It's as good as saying everyone over 6 feet tall pays more for car insurance, because most of those people will be men. No problem with that, except it's strictly forbidden to do this when it affects women or any other group. Health insurance is a good example. There is no way to charge women more for health insurance, even though they take a LOT more out of healthcare than men. Men still have to pay the same rates. If this wa…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 11:56 PM
6

In common law countries, judicial interpretation makes law along with the legislature. Their decisions are law. Look at Roe v Wade. Women's much vaunted "right to choose" comes from the Supreme Court.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 11:39 PM
6

It makes sense when you look at it in it's original intended purpose. Men had to bind themselves to women in this agreement which essentially amounted to an exchange of sex and children bearing for protection and provision. The marriage contract was designed to ensure men could not easily abandon their wives, it was security for them. Now though, when women don't need protection nor provision, it makes no sense to bind yourself to such a promise in exchange for nothing.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:21 AM
7

This is unfortunately also the case in the UK. A mother automatically has parental responsibility for her child from birth. A father usually has parental responsibility if he’s: married to the child’s mother listed on the birth certificate (after a certain date, depending on which part of the UK the child was born in) Unmarried men have no parental rights whatsoever unless the mother grants them.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:15 AM
9

This paper was not scientific, it was about "sexism" in job prospects of biologists. It wasn't about actual biology. The reviewer appears to have been concerned about "ideological assumptions" being inserted into their conclusion. Without reading both their paper and the review, not a lot more can be said. But it sounds a lot like a load of feminist "social science" being submitted to a hard science journal and getting rejected.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:14 PM
96

Pussy pass in action. At least her legal career is over before it begins.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:39 PM
7

Ask the same women on a different occasion how they'd feel if a nurse deliberately gave a mother the wrong baby in the hospital, and what they think should happen to the nurse and the hospital. Suddenly knees are indeed jerking. The difference is, men find both scenarios equally repugnant; women for some reason do not.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 12:21 AM
3

There are a few leads on pills. One is based on a plant in Indonesia which is chewed by local fishermen to induce temporary sterility. They've isolated whatever it is this plant produces to cause this and it has a 99.9% success rate in test studies. From what I understand in layman terms, it damages an enzyme in sperm cells so they can't penetrate a female egg, but it has no effect on hormones or the sperm production process itself. It just makes the cells you produce too flimsy to be effective.…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 05:08 PM
1

This is the system women wanted. This is a very rare occasion when it backfires on them. In 99% of the applications of this law, it's a husband hiding assets (he probably built himself) from his wife to prevent her tearing it in half. When he's found out he loses it all. It takes a few women suffering these extremes for most people to realise just how ridiculously unfair this system is. But this is the system women wanted and feminism continues to protect.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 04:38 PM
1

It's important to the extent of establishing whether or not there was intent to kill. In theory, you can intend to kill me and non-fatally wound me in the leg - failing to do what you intended to do. You could even fail to hurt me at all. This is still attempted murder (among other things). However the prosecution would probably have a hard time proving your intent to kill on those facts alone in practice. It doesn't matter that it was a poor attempt, your state of mind is what distinguishes mur…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 02:46 PM
5

So why do we end up with embarrassing situations like this? Thankfully that example was only embarrassing for the officers involved. It could quite easily have been very dangerous had the man been so inclined to actually retaliate rather than brush them off and run.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 01:38 AM
60

"What's mine is mine, what's yours is ours."
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 09:04 PM
5

As an objective observer, do not ever crack on this no matter what kind of pressure the rest of your family puts on you. You're being reasonable (and smart) here. She's quite clearly in it for your money. She feels entitled to the option of divorcing him and living on your hard earned money when she gets bored of the marriage. She's so furious because women really do feel entitled to it. You're denying her her birthright. The price of the vagina.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 09:01 PM
1

Well overuse of this weapon has scorched the earth. If your average college girl is walking around with this definition of rape in her head, then women aren't even going to take it seriously. Real victims of rape will be in the same category as drunken regretful hookups. It's difficult to attach moral weight to such trivial nonsense.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:55 PM
10

It's astonishing that somebody who's supposed to be a professional in human relations is that far off the mark. The power of feminist indoctrination. I don't want to think about how many anaesthetised doped up men are walking around out there like zombies wondering why their wives divorced raped them after they chemically castrated themselves to make her happy.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 01:55 PM
11

I really don't see the distinction. We're talking about the weight of the gear they have to carry. I don't see how this has anything to do with scientific inquiry. The gear weighs x lbs. You need to carry x lbs up a rope of y length. That's all the science there is to it. The reason the gear weighs x lbs is because that's how heavy the gear happens to be. We're not in a weight room here, they use the actual gear you need to carry in training including the rifles. Like I said, it's not athletics.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:45 PM
8

Military standards certainly aren't arbitrary. Their training isn't like that of an athlete which just focuses on improving performance. For instance as somebody pointed out earlier: "But one particularly demanding upper-body strength test is climbing a 25-foot rope with a backpack full of gear. A candidate who cannot crawl to the top fails the test." The point of this test is to make sure the marines can climb with the weight of all the gear they need to survive on the front lines. It isn't an …
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:16 PM
1

Do yourself a favour and watch this before you do. Then ask yourself if you really want to inflict that on your own baby.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:35 PM
13

You can cut off whatever body parts you want. Don't force anyone else to.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 11:38 AM
3

There's mountains of peer reviewed neurological work on gender differences in the physiology of the brain. It just isn't taught anywhere. I'm not even a scientist (or even a would be scientist), but I've spoken to people who are in this field who haven't even read these papers. You have to seek it out to find it. You certainly won't see this stuff republished in the watered down pop science the media feeds the public, so nobody but specialised professionals really has any true knowledge of it. T…
/r/TheRedPill16/04/15 10:23 AM
185

Evidence that men are better at being women than women.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/15 07:50 AM
1

Because that was changed in the 2003 act. Sodomy isn't a crime any more, it used to be. I suspect the gay thing was partly why it was changed. Now it's all covered by "assault by penetration." Basically if you sexually penetrate someone with anything other than a penis, it's ABP. If you use a penis, it's rape. Both offences are legally identical in terms of sentencing, they only differ in name and whether or not a penis was involved. Edit: Just to add, the abolition of the sodomy law was a posit…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:23 AM
3

Was there ever a point in your life where you even considered raping someone to be acceptable behaviour? Did you need your parents to sit you down and explain to you that rape is bad, mkay? Reflect on that notion for a moment. The implication here is that rape is a crime of ignorance. They simply are not aware that rape is wrong. Nobody told them! Does that really sound plausible to you?
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:12 PM
2

Don't borrow too much from this analogy. Our brains are much, much more than electrical. There are substantial chemical and biological processes going on in there as well. Look at how much somebody's behaviour changes with the addition of a single hormone (say testosterone or estrogen therapy for transexuals). One hormonal change among billions can substantially alter a personality. Take a single chemical change. Alcohol or drugs. One chemical change among billions. I don't believe the brain/min…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 07:44 PM
7

Not the field in its current state. A cursory glance at contemporary psychology reveals it as ideologically based. The OP's own response to my comment demonstrates this where his own professor admitted to neglecting to teach these substantial physical neurological differences because they're "taboo." This is no way to run an academic discipline. Since nothing in psychology can be reliably measured or tested, my faith goes to neuroscience to explore these questions. Granted I have a belief that s…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 07:35 PM
7

It's not what I personally think, it's what the statute says.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 07:14 PM
14

An operating system is not an emergent property of a computer. It's installed software. Human brains are not electronic processors. You've kind of defeated your own point with your own analogy. If the mind is an emergent property of the brain, the architecture of the brain itself is integral to the development of that emergent property we call the mind. The computer however is only a vessel for the operating system which came into being completely independently. You cannot have a human mind with…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 05:58 PM
71

Actual scientists in neurology and neuroscience have categorically proven significant differences in our brains. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9215725 Modern stereological methods provide precise and reliable estimates of the number of neurons in specific regions of the brain. We decided to estimate the total number of neocortical neurons in the normal human brain and to analyze it with respect to the major macro- and microscopical structural components, to study the internal relationships …
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 04:35 PM
12

Yes. "Female rape" as you describe it is covered by section 4 "Causing sexual activity without consent" - which carries a maximum of 10 years. Rape carries a maximum of life. Women cannot legally be branded rapists.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:21 PM
11

In Britain they can't be rapists according to the law. Sexual Offences Act 2003 Rape (1)A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents. They can commit "assault by penetration" which carries the same sentence, but not rape. A woman "forcing sex" is a much lesser offence than rape.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:05 PM
6

So she's decided to killed the company? As /u/goatsandbros points out, she can cover herself in cotton wool all she likes - but other companies won't. Captialism doesn't yield to petty nonsense like this. The best employees will simply go to Reddit's competitors who have the freedom to offer them better packages in negotiation.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:59 PM
4

Why go from date/live with to marriage? What benefit to you get from giving them the power to ruin you on a whim over the existing arrangement? I don't understand why people feel the need to involve the state in their love lives. Especially when the state is overwhelmingly on the woman's side.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:53 PM
4

as the friendship collapsed. Anyone notice how "friendships" with women tend to involve a lot of giving from the male and taking from the female? Be it time, money or whatever resource you happen to have, female friends will tap it like a leech. Waste of time. I only have female acquaintances now.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 10:18 AM
16

Reason #841 not to get married.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:53 AM
5

Which just bows down to the loophole. If I get you to sign an employment contract the day before you're to be evicted for non payment from your home, it doesn't invalidate the contract. Nicely highlighting the enormous female privilege in contract law.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:50 AM
5

A prudent business man wouldn't invest over half his net worth into a venture with a 40-50% failure rate to begin with. It's betting your life's work on a coin toss. Commercial lunacy.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:47 AM
2

There are numerically far more "smart" men and men are much smarter, men are also much dumber. This is also a bit of a red herring. I refer you to the most comprehensive analysis ever done on the vast amount of IQ data we have available: http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/psicologia/pei/download/Lynn2004.pdf A meta-analysis of 57 IQ studies of sex differences in general population samples showed that males obtain higher means from the age of 15 through to old age. Among adults, the male advantage is…
/r/TheRedPill08/04/15 08:57 AM
6

So lets apply this to healthcare, something men are propping up economically, and women are consuming disproportionately. In fact, if we applied this concept equally into all areas of life, I think society might just collapse.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 08:57 PM
7

Well played, sir.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 09:06 PM
3

We're also not living in the neolithic period where this sort of shit needs to matter. If 50 million women were suddenly stricken by a plague which only affects females, the world wouldn't really flinch because reproductive extinction isn't exactly high on our list of concerns. I won't subject myself to a system designed to exploit me to the benefit of my partner. It seems my position is gaining popularity with other men. So if anyone wants that to change, the system needs to change to make marr…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:12 PM
1

The Wikimedia Foundation does not own copyright on Wikipedia article texts and illustrations. It is therefore pointless to email our contact addresses asking for permission to reproduce articles or images, even if rules at your company or school or organization mandate that you ask web site operators before copying their content. The only Wikipedia content you should contact the Wikimedia Foundation about is the trademarked Wikipedia/Wikimedia logos, which are not freely usable without permissio…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 10:34 PM
7

It's sort of been done by the Dutch version of the TV show survivor. Unfortunately I couldn't find a copy with English subtitles but here it is in Dutch for the sake of reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uc2EtMhoKU There's a good summary of how it went here. initially both groups were dropped on their respective islands, given some supplies to get started and left to fend for themselves. In both groups there was some initial squabbling as people tried to figure out a local hierarchy. Th…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 03:26 PM
1

The problem for me is that I don't want to give anyone that kind of power over me. ALL women in a marriage have the power to fundamentally ruin you in a range of ways. Yes, they even have options on exactly how, or to what extent they feel like destroying your life when the fancy strikes them. On principle, I don't accept surrendering that kind of power over my life to anyone. Especially not without having comparable power over them, we don't even get the option of mutually assured destruction. …
/r/MensRights25/03/15 10:03 AM
2

Sounds a lot like the psychology behind militaristic nationalism.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 09:54 AM
7

So they've finally built an actual hugbox?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 09:27 AM
7

Reject this term "benevolent sexism." It's female privilege. Either it's benevolent sexism for both sexes, or it's privilege.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:12 PM
1

We don't have bodily autonomy. If we had a right to bodily autonomy, why aren't you allowed to decide what to put into your body? Why can't you partake in some heroin if you so desire? Why would exercising your bodily autonomy in that capacity warrant the loss of your liberty? On something less extreme, take prescription drugs. Many students "self medicate" with amphetamines like Adderall to increase performance and productivity. Suppose as a student you understood the consequences, risks and be…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:16 PM
2

I see it as a simple case of path of least resistance. If this option were available, I think a lot of people would take it simply because it'd be easy and certain. The economy would suffer substantially because I can't see many choosing to kill themselves working when they could support themselves with all their needs met with a fraction of the effort.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:04 PM
2

Still a lot cheaper than a divorce. As he said, a real woman can cost you that in a single day. I imagine such technology would come with monthly payment plans. It'd be like buying a car.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:01 PM
8

Women have much greater hygiene concerns in that department than men do. If we're lopping bits off on ridiculous justifications of hygiene, women should be first in line.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:40 AM
1

Ah yes, haven't had the boyfriend rejection in years. Must be getting old. Welcome to the war marine.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/15 11:29 AM
13

Haha great analogy. We're just tired of chasing that shit all over the damn savannah. She'll do.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/15 11:15 AM
1

Do you have a source for this women coder thing? I've never heard of that before. A (competent) female coder is worth her weight in gold in that industry. Where did they all go? At what point did they dominate the field before leaving when it became lucrative (for the reason that it's a highly skilled job with a high demand).
/r/MensRights16/03/15 11:05 AM
5

4chan, ever the bastion of insight into the human condition.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:04 PM
10

Judge Susan Evans said: 'There are babies in these images, two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four and five-year-olds. They are not all young children, but there are some very young children so it does make it very serious indeed.' 'Theses children are the victims and people do not know what happens to them. But I know for sure they suffer serious physical and emotional damage from what they suffer in these appalling pictures.' I don't think we're talking about drawings here.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:22 PM
1

Except the studies have repeatedly shown that women win around half the elections they run for. The reason they're only around 20% of congress is because not enough women run for office. To achieve your artificial 50% we'd have to literally rig the system for the sake of diversity.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:21 PM
1

Does the current black president represent the interests of the average black American? There is no logic behind your kind of thinking other than "it looks good." If blacks, or women, or any other group were somehow prevented from participating in the democratic process; then that is a problem we'd need to address. But so long as they all have access to that same system, who are you or I or anybody else to presume to manipulate the will of the people? I find the entire idea abhorrent.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:37 AM
1

There is nothing democratic about this sort of thing. Forcing "accurate" representation sounds preposterous to me. Only idiots feel represented by people who look like them. Do you feel every man in congress represents your interests purely because you share a gender? How about we let people choose who they feel best represents them for themselves without socially engineering the outcome?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:41 PM
8

Yes affirmative action over democracy to decide who runs our towns, cities and country. What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 01:01 AM
3

As /u/HardKase said, it just means an unlawful act which resulted in a death. The name is a bit misleading. Voluntary manslaughter is actually a partial defence to murder. You can't be charged with it. It's reserved for circumstances like provocation or loss of control.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:25 PM
0

You're not being robbed if you freely agreed to do it. The current racket middle class women have going on in the west isn't necessary. Once children are in school, the day is free for work. The state already softens the blow substantially with generous maternity leave. At that point they choose not to work, and this is what creates the much vaunted "pay gap." But it is their right to choose, provided their husbands are happy to support them while they remain home to do whatever it is they spend…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 02:03 AM
0

We're not talking about child support. Alimony is an antiquated system of the "patriarchy" to force men to honour their commitments to support women who couldn't look after themselves. Now women are independent, so we're told. They can look after themselves. They have all the same opportunities as men do. So if they leave a marriage, there is no reason why they should continue to be entitled to their husband's support. The husband's children however are entitled to his support, marriage or other…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 01:09 AM
1

These 150 victims of femicide. So our epidemic affecting 0.00023% of the population. Truly endemic of "a society in which men’s violence against women is entrenched and systemic. When misogyny, sexism and the objectification of women are so pervasive that they are all but inescapable."
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:37 PM
1

Do you have sources for that? I don't doubt you, I'd just like to add it to my collection.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:31 PM
33

If someone happens to open the door for you, I don't know why you'd even consider being angry about it. That's the behaviour of a sociopath. But you also don't get to expect it of men purely for being men.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 03:18 PM
4

I'm beginning to suspect they don't actually realise what the word "equality" means. They just like to use it because it feels good.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 03:09 PM
11

Why isn't the Patriarchy protecting women? Save me Patriarchy! If you don't laugh you'll cry.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:53 PM
177

Well ladies this is the result of a few generations of feminism, its relentless assault on masculinity and the scourge of single motherhood depriving boys of all access to male role models. Enjoy.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 03:04 PM
1

What needs to happen before we take female violence seriously and hold women accountable for this kind of appalling criminal behaviour?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 02:44 PM
5

Hats off to the author for a fair and balanced report.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 10:21 AM
2

UKIP purely out of morbid curiosity.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 01:53 PM
1

Just a personal observation of mine. It isn't always as hostile as the feminist approach as in this case, but women do tend to try to change "male spaces" to be more accommodating to them. You see this a lot in places like gyms. I never see men caring about ladies nights or female only gyms or any exclusive enterprise they set up. Every time men do it though, women either want it banned (more militant feminist approach) or made more inclusive for them to the point where essence is changed. Look …
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:36 AM
76

The problem is if you try to fight it as a student you're censured severely. You underestimate just how hostile colleges have become. I can only compare it with the inquisition. Opposition to feminism is tantamount to heresy and it will affect your grades or even result in you being forced out of the school. If anyone cares to fully appreciate the level of insanity we're talking about here, I highly recommend this account of FIRE's campaign to shut down a literal SJW indoctrination camp forced o…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 08:11 PM
9

Hybristophilia is an interesting phenomenon among women, especially when it manifests as an attraction to some of the most depraved and violent psychotics the gene pool has ever produced. One of the most infamous examples of hybristophilia is the large number of women attracted to Ted Bundy after his arrest.[5] He often drew scores of women at the jammed courtrooms of his trials each day.[6] Bundy allegedly received hundreds of love letters from women while he was incarcerated. Yes the infamous …
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:19 PM
51

Such circumstances already exist. You can be roped into child support in many western countries, including the US, Canada and UK through the doctrine of Equitable Paternity and sometimes statute if you "assume the role of a father". That can be as simple as buying the kid a gift. The New York Court of Appeals recently reinforced the doctrine of equitable paternity, ruling 5-2 that a man who acted as a father to a girl he assumed was his daughter was estopped from denying paternity even after DNA…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 01:44 PM
83

I never understood why feminists, but also women in general, seem to attack "male spaces" with such ferocity. I'm fairly sure the bar wouldn't be "unsafe" for women either, if they so desired to watch hockey and eat chicken wings on valentines day for lack of a date. But no, one bar decides to offer something different for this (female centric) holiday and cater to single guys, and it's got to go. It reeks of pettiness to me.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:25 AM
20

I wonder if they realise that the second X chromosome is inactive? That active Y mutation however is responsible for quite a bit, like civilization.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:19 AM
3

The interesting thing about those statistics is the criteria they used to determine "false accusation." If you apply the same criteria to determine whether a report is legitimate, only 1-8% of reported rapes are true. Excellent breakdown here: http://www.datagoneodd.com/blog/2015/01/25/how-to-lie-and-mislead-with-rape-statistics-part-1/ It may be a good idea to stop leaving research like this to ideologues who begin with their conclusions.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 09:58 AM
3

There is no suggestion, nor could there be, that B's circumcision can or should give rise to care proceedings. So, given the nature of the local authority's case on this point, we are in this curious situation. G's FGM Type IV (had it been proved) would have been relied upon by the local authority, prior to its change of stance referred to above, as justifying the adoption of both children, even though on any objective view it might be thought that G would have subjected to a process much less i…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:40 AM
4

There's a pretty good breakdown of the absurd sexism and misandry in Sweden's laws here. The unfortunate irony of Sweden being perhaps the most feminist and multicultural country in the world has resulted in them also having the highest rape rate in Europe and second highest in the world on account of the mass importation of third world immigrants from countries I can only describe as medieval. "According to rape crisis advocates in Sweden, one-third of Swedish women have been sexually assaulted…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 05:59 PM
7

In a population of 316,100,000 - not terribly. How many of those rapes were suffered by poor, drug addicted prostitutes in the very worst cities in America? How many were reoccurring statistics within these demographics? How many were proportionally suffered by your average middle class white feminist?
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 08:07 PM
6

I was wondering how long it would take for the college kangaroo courts to make it to the UK.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:39 PM
3

My sentiment exactly. It's her prerogative to leave. I'm not going to judge her. But she better be paying like any man would be made to.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:59 PM
2

You missed out in the 60's.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 06:57 AM
2

You may have a point here. One area women dominate us in is social prowess. The natural preferential treatment could be offset if men (I myself could improve) turned more of their attention to this arena. As we all know, connections get you everywhere. That applies in anything. So it follows that if people like teachers just like you, you're going to be treated well - or at least fairly. If you're like me and just couldn't give a shit about making people like you as only merit should matter, the…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 10:13 AM
-2

On the contrary, the popular move would be to pander to women and feminism. Why do you think the other three parties continue to do so? Women are the single most important voting bloc. Men find it very difficult to unify over issues like this until they're personally burned by the system.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:40 AM
5

The other three parties have zero interest in addressing the systematic persecution of men in the family courts. Indeed, feminist jurisprudence has infected that field for decades and the situation has only worsened for men under both the Conservatives and Labour. Judging by what we've heard from the Greens recently, the alternatives only seem even worse.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:36 AM
4

Do you mind disclosing your height/weight for dosing reference?
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 01:54 AM
2

It isn't a fine line. 13,520 or 6.8% of custodial sentences in the US are for sexual offences (all types). That's 0.0042% of the total population. Even if we make some ridiculous arbitrary assumption even feminists wouldn't make like "900% of rapists escape prison" - we're talking about 0.042%. There is no justification for this. It's demonising male sexuality and frightening young boys to the point where they will be paranoid and afraid to date women. I like to call it puritanical feminism. We'…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 01:25 AM
54

Lets see if it passes the find/replace test. Just the other day, the National Wildlife Federation announced its new president – a Jewish "whiz kid". Last month, the Climate Reality Project, founded by Al Gore, replaced its female chief executive with a Jew. Last November, the National Parks and Conservation Association replaced its veteran leader with another Jew. Now take a look at the top executives at eight of the top 10 groups devoted to fighting that fight: Sierra Club? Jew. Nature Conserva…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:21 PM
3

It doesn't. The maxim is "drunken consent is still consent." Just as "drunken intent is still intent." Whether or not you would have consented (or intended something) had you not been intoxicated is irrelevant, even if you're heavily intoxicated. The question is whether you did indeed consent. You need to be intoxicated to the point of incapacitation to vitiate consent. Oddly enough, it's only rape when you're so drunk that you simply cannot consent. This is the whole reason why feminists want r…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:26 AM
5

Point out a legal right a woman doesn't have that I have. I can point out several rights women have that I don't. Parental rights, reproductive rights, right to bodily integrity, unqualified right to vote (draft); and if feminists get their way, the right to due process.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 01:53 AM
1

I appreciate her sentiment but I think it's safe to say men would prefer fairness over her empathy. Sympathy and recognition of the anger of wronged men, while appreciated, doesn't address what's making so many men so angry and indeed, suicidal. The guys in jail over false accusations, the guys who haven't seen their kids in years, the guys who are destitute from alimony; these guys don't want to be emotionally understood. They want the gross injustice levied against them rectified.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 02:12 PM
12

Her delusional conclusions draw from three extremely misandric central tenants of feminism. Patriarchy, rape culture and "toxic" masculinity. Your analogy doesn't work when the ideology itself is bigoted. As far as I'm aware, religions don't preach terrorism or child molestation. Feminism holds these hateful ideas as central tenants. The core is rotten, not just the people.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 02:00 PM
3

Excellent post OP, I've often come to the same conclusions in my observations of feminism. They increasingly advocate for policies and laws which infantalise women to secure special treatment in every imaginable arena. The original argument that we are all equal doesn't exactly stand up to scrutiny when they insist women need as much help as possible to compete in everything from education to employment. They cling to victimhood and burden society (read, men) with catering to and protecting wome…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:22 AM
5

I just explained that it isn't derogatory to anyone except the person it's aimed at because it deliberately invalidates their self-identity. That is the root of the degradation.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:44 PM
1

Since men are just better runners than women she's right. "You swim like a fish" is another complement I've heard. Kiss like a fish... not so much. The point is it's nothing to do with he value of women or fish. It's a waste of time to be offended over metaphors.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:34 PM
14

A lot of people seem to misunderstand the point of these kind of insults. A girl is insulted if you tell her she walks (or does anything) like a man. Is walking like a man a bad thing? No, you're just invalidating her femininity which is pretty insulting. It has nothing to do with relative value of femininity. It's telling a dog he barks like a cat.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:15 PM
3

It's purely because they're unreliable and inconsistent. Courts don't want juries putting too much faith in a "lie detector test." If we had a machine that could identify deception in everyone with 100% accuracy, I'm sure that would be admissible.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 05:50 PM
5

The "for the children" excuse really is getting old. It's funny how "best interests of the child" always correlates to the best interests of the mother.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:26 AM
4

You can have sex with a woman who is legitimately incapable of consenting from intoxication without the use of force. It is also not always the case that a victim will attempt to resist or defend themselves because of fear.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:00 AM
4

You may be interested to know that there is currently an enormous debate going on about the concept of "rape by deception" in criminal jurisprudence. Jonathan. Herring, ‘Mistaken Sex’ [2005] Crim LR, 511 A particularly chilling piece from feminist jurisprudence which argues all forms of deception, such as lying about your job or how much you earn should vitiate consent and amount to rape. Alex. Sharpe, ‘Criminalising Sexual Intimacy: Transgender Defendants and the Legal Construction of Non-Conse…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 05:50 AM
1

Not sure why you're being downvoted, you're right but not for all states (just over half). There is a force requirement for rape in these states which feminists have been trying to remove. The UK and other US states have no such requirement any more. Rape is simply sex without consent. On this point I agree with them because forcing someone into sex with blackmail or other forms of coercion should be criminal.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 05:39 AM
2

No, that's the attrition rate. To say "only about 2% of rapists will ever serve a day in prison" is to say every single allegation made to the police, combined with every estimated case not reported (based on what?), is a confirmed case of rape. Those RAINN figures only tell us that only around 20% of allegations the police receive even warrant enough evidence for an arrest - even today with our hugely discriminatory anti-rape policies. That suggests a greater indicator of the prevalence of fals…
/r/MensRights01/02/15 11:42 PM
6

I can't speak for the USA, but in the UK the conviction rate for rape is 58%. The average conviction rate for all crimes is 57%. There is nothing different nor special about it except for the fact that it's a crime that has been politicised by ideologues. This is evidenced by the conflation of attrition rate with conviction rate so feminists can spout sensationalist nonsense like what you've parroted above. It's rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 09:28 AM
4

With all the noise we're hearing from feminists and their politicians about treating women differently in the criminal justice system, despite the fact that men already suffer gross systematic discrimination, I think we can assume this is the next push. I wouldn't be surprised if women were just immune to all prosecution in a few decades. Recommendations were made in the UK a few years ago to abolish women's prisons altogether in favour of community sentences. Now that's being made a reality alr…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 11:55 PM
6

I really love that the mainstream media is giving us so much publicity.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 01:35 PM
2

This really is chilling. Institutional sexism grossly persecuting men within the "justice system". Patriarchy indeed.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:24 PM
2

So treating women with respect and protecting them is toxic? Treating them as equals means treating them like men, which is also apparently toxic. In fact men who treat women as equals (as they do men) are viewed as misogynists by women.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 09:23 AM
2

For instance, a guy who treats his girlfriend like crap and orders her around when other guys are around, because he thinks it'll raise his status with the guys. Except traditional male gender roles promote the concept of chivalry, an ancient code of masculine virtue which included treating women with respect and protecting them from harm; even to the point of fatal self sacrifice. This concept was, and still is relentlessly assaulted by feminists as early as the suffragettes. More modern exampl…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:36 AM
2

Just wanted to show appreciation for drawing attention to that. Very interesting read.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:55 AM
14

A straw man is a misrepresentation of an argument. Where exactly is his misrepresentation? Fraternities have been called "rape dens" by mainstream feminists for quite some time.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:35 AM
12

To borrow from an above analogy, would you allow your daughter to visit a crack den just because she enjoyed it? Would you be happy about her college allowing it? The rape culture hysteria is finally costing colleges heavily in lawsuits. I really don't know what these women expected them to do in response.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:27 AM
14

The Sexual Offences Act isn't changing. This isn't new legislation. It's a new police mandate. It doesn't concern the crime of rape or the courts, it concerns how the police are instructed to investigate it - with a presumption of guilt.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:30 PM
2

It's so far removed from the very meaning of "oppression" that I'm having trouble believing your sincerity. Hemsworth was the title lead star, she was in a supporting role. On the issue of agents and how actor pay works in general, Robert Downey Jr. was paid less than Terrence Howard for Iron Man. RDJ being the more famous, the leading role and more accomplished. How the salary negotiations of elite actors is in any way comparable to the state discriminating against people for no other reason th…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:13 AM
1

So Chris Hemsworth has a better agent? I only wish I were oppressed to the tune of ten million dollars.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:51 AM
3

It'd help if they had tangible examples of how exactly I'm benefiting from or indeed participating in all this oppression. Any of us could sound off a respectable list in the opposite direction. Sentencing gap, genital mutilation, parental rights, reproductive rights, draconian divorce law - all of these are institutional state sanctioned forms of sexism. I struggle to find a comparable example applicable to women in the year 2015 that isn't fiction, like the paygap. All they really refer to is …
/r/MensRights27/01/15 11:59 PM
2

"Cisphobic" I can't wait to use that one.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 11:46 PM
2

The fathers of all the female gymnasts you see in the Olympics are guilty of similar crimes. Their daughters would have had strict regimes of exercise and diet, and likely a father who encouraged discipline. This is particularly striking OP. This is how you cultivate greatness. Well, this is how men cultivate greatness. Women who achieve great things do so with discipline and dedication as their foundations, just as men do. This, as we all know, must be cultivated. It's possible to do so yoursel…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 02:55 PM
5

I wouldn't go the feminist route of making a mountain out of a mole hill. You can either tolerate it, indulge in their dynamic and use their language back at them, or address them as adults and explain how you feel it's inappropriate. I've found people will generally respond if you explain things with tact. I doubt they're doing it to purposefully mess with you, it's just how they are. Since the behaviour doesn't bother you as much as the double standard, I'd suggest tolerating or indulging in i…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:41 PM
6

Typically one sided reporting but they didn't even quote from the "judgement" of this wiki court to examine their reasoning. I'm not involved in any of this business but I've seen what feminists have been doing on Wikipedia over the last few years, and seen women's studies departments offering extra credit to inject feminist bias. It seems like a good idea to keep these people away from these topics if they can't be impartial, that goes for both sides. If this signals the beginning of a purge of…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 02:29 PM
10

I know in the UK, if you have sex with a woman under the pretences of wearing a condom (when you're not), it's rape. The reasoning is that it violates her sexual autonomy. Of course the reverse isn't true with women lying about birth control.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 01:40 PM
0

This is a perfect example of why the MRM exists. Feminists insist that they're inclusive of male issues too, yet here we see them censoring and suppressing any discussion of one of the biggest human rights violations men face in the developed world from the discussion.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 01:38 PM
4

Feminism is an ideological movement, and it is partisan in nature. The MRM is not ideological. We don't have central tenants, theories or doctrine. We all have different social, political and personal views. The MRM is instead issue based. We focus on tangible inequality in law such as genital mutilation, family law and paternity fraud. Feminism focuses on intangible spectres of patriarchy and rape culture. We are incomparable. Our staunch opposition to feminism is strictly because it's a partis…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 03:13 AM
6

There is no pay gap. There is an "earning gap" because men as a group, on average, work a lot more hours and take fewer sick days than women as a group. The only way to remedy this, if it is indeed a problem, is for women to work as much as men are working - perhaps to the point where they lose the extra years of life they have on men. No company in the Anglosphere is paying Larry more than Sally for the same job. It just isn't happening. It's impossible to pull off, and if it were possible, nob…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 03:00 AM
56

This is why we need paternity fraud laws. We can start by doing away with this business of mother's declaring who fathers are on nothing but their word alone; or perhaps more accurately, who they feel the father should be. Men should have the sole power to declare that themselves. I tried to find the cited study and found reference to it in the footnotes of a letter he wrote to a Judge on this issue. The entire document is worth a read, but the relevant part is on page 3. http://house.michigan.g…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 07:55 PM
2

In the immediate aftermath of a disaster yes, but I don't see that lasting when the dust settles. In 1969 Montreal's police and fire department collectively went on strike over pay, leaving no officers on the streets for a day. In those lawless 16 hours, the city descended into total violent anarchy. Montreal is in a state of shock. A police officer is dead and 108 people have been arrested following 16 hours of chaos during which police and firefighters refused to work. At first, the strike's i…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 05:59 PM
7

If I were Asda and lost this, I'd just indiscriminately reallocate the staff to new positions. The female cashiers can work in the warehouses and the warehouse workers can sit on the tills - since it's all the same.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:05 PM
6

Brilliant article.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:43 PM
73

The only people who can fix the "earnings gap" are women by working as much as men do.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:33 PM
5

“When you have to run for election, this is what you have to do,” said Ballin, the victim’s brother. Are Judges elected in the US? There is a very good reason why they're not in the traditional British common law system. This is one of them. They're not meant to be subject to politics or popularity contests.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:14 AM
3

This is largely why many social sciences, and especially gender studies fields are about as respected as astrology and crystal gazing. Ideologically driven post hoc "studies" which presuppose the conclusion are routinely published by these "academics" to further advance their ideological position. It's the antithesis of the scientific method, and the way in which they suppress scrutiny as if it were heresy bears more resemblance to the inquisition than academia.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 12:58 AM
6

Google will happily reveal the vast industry of female cosmetic products making use of fibroblast cells found in foreskins.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:18 PM
10

Clegg's comments are particularly striking to me. But Page Three was not "in keeping with the way in which women both want to be and should be represented" Why do these models represent all women? Does anyone here feel personally represented by any man who appears in media for no other reason than their gender? Are we all personally represented as men by both Woody Allen and Dwayne Johnson? Does this make any sense to anyone? I don't understand why feminists cling to this mindless collectivism. …
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:41 PM
2

The systematic persecution of fathers in the family courts creating the scourge of single motherhood is perhaps the greatest plight on our society today. Though I have no doubt that men will continue to be blamed for the consequences of their own persecution. 61% of all child abuse is committed by biological mothers. 25% of all child abuse is committed by natural fathers.1 79.6% of custodial mothers receive a support award. 29.9% of custodial fathers receive a support award. 46.9% of non-custodi…
/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:49 AM
6

They've cost the misandric cesspit that is Gawker Media millions already. That's progress in my book.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:03 AM
9

The teacher either didn't understand the law or lied. Feminist ideas of what consent means doesn't correspond with the legal reality, at least in the UK. In R v Bree the Court of Appeal held: If, through drink (or for any other reason) the complainant has temporarily lost her capacity to choose whether to have intercourse on the relevant occasion, she is not consenting… However, where the complainant has voluntarily consumed even substantial quantities of alcohol, but nevertheless remains capabl…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 08:12 PM
422

Do women really need their hand held in everything to achieve "equality"? Does this not discredit the entire idea to begin with? It's kinda like making Usain Bolt race me with concrete shoes so I can say we're equally good sprinters.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 01:33 PM
9

It is indeed a privilege to be so liberated by alienation that we hang ourselves in unprecedented numbers. More needs to be done to liberate other demographics in the interests of equality.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 09:43 AM
11

It isn't so much an issue of being happily married. You can maintain a perfect relationship, but your wife still has that gun in her purse. A gun she could shoot you with on a whim at any moment. That's the problem. The balance of power in a marriage is overwhelmingly tilted in favour of women. You're completely at her mercy, trusting her not to fundamentally ruin you. You have nothing to balance the scale or to protect yourself. Only her word. This kind of power imbalance is not how marriages s…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/15 11:24 AM
4

It's objectively foolish for a man to get married in this day and age. There is no benefit to it, only risk. I don't understand why any man would want to surrender that kind of power over himself to a woman. It seems like the most "beta" move you could possibly make.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/15 11:15 AM
2

Yes, juries are not required to explain their decisions. I'd wager that's what happened here. They ignored the law.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 07:53 AM
283

I don't find it at all surprising. Women have largely been indoctrinated to believe outright fabrications about what the male experience is really like. When they're actually treated like men it must feel like hatred. It reminds me of the experiences of feminist Norah Vincent when she spent a year living as a man. As Paul Elam once said, equality is a step down for women.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 07:44 AM
4

That was truly glorious.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 05:32 PM
3

A Telegraph survey shows half of female undergraduates know someone who has suffered sexual assault or unwanted advances ranging from groping to rape Is this seriously an online poll about hearsay? I think I preferred it when they fabricated peer reviewed studies.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 01:00 PM
1

The backlash in the comments of these bigoted articles is getting more prominent. This from a female reader: Strange how we don't see any sexist articles like this in the mens section isn't it... We don't have any articles named "Are women natural born prostitutes?!".... And then the next day you will be laughably trying to talk about sexism against women when you are hypocritically producing click bait like this.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:11 AM
11

A 250lbs bodybuilder will die all the same to a shotgun shell. This is nothing but gender sterotyping. Men have no obligation to die for the sake of women. You could say that they're not entitled to our protection. If we choose to provide it, it's a privilege. Shaming men for choosing not to give their lives to attempt to save strangers is appalling. In fact it meets the definition of patriarchy - but you don't see feminists attacking Mr. Nile for perpetuating it.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 05:20 AM
6

Why is everything "empowering" or "oppressive" to these people? I'd call a car a convenience. It's like they live in a fantasy novel.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 04:47 AM
3

I know an ex teacher who retrained as an electrician in his 40's because of this stigma. He enjoyed his job but found the risks involved to be too great to continue with it.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 04:42 AM
3

Ironically this is only a good thing. The crazier it gets, the more alienating it becomes.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 01:13 PM
2

Since we argue from egalitarian grounds, trans rights as well as women's and gay rights are advocated by extension. We just don't address their specific issues unique to them, because it just isn't on our agenda. Feminism may be our nemesis, but I for one would be the first to stand up for women if government legitimately oppressed them in some way because of their gender, like revoking their right to drive. The same goes for trans, gays and any other group which might be out there. We advocate …
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:15 AM
1

It seems like the false accusation issue is receiving a lot more press in recent months. More public awareness and outrage may lead to a turn in the tides as far as public perception goes. Don't bank on these malevolent women being appropriately punished just yet, but it may go some way towards eroding the witch hunt mentality and the automatic presumption of male guilt.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:03 AM
4

So you'd remove some urinals from men's toilets just to implement an exact ratio? To what end? Waste space? We can't transfer the unused space from one room down the hall into another. Even with perfect ratios men will still do their business faster. The only way to implement similar space efficiency is to introduce female urinals, something I think you'd object to. Our restrooms are all about efficiency. We stand shoulder to shoulder and piss into a metal trough. It's barely a step up from piss…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 07:21 AM
3

Segregation works as a matter of practicality more than anything. Men can just piss standing up with great efficiency. Women are once again oppressed by their biology. Unless they want to deal with female urinals, nothing can be done about it. Women's public bathrooms are already required to be larger than the men's by code. Mixing bathrooms would just force both genders to stand in line because the women still wouldn't be moving any faster.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 07:05 AM
4

You're assuming I'm being emotional through nothing but text. I attach no emotional connotations to the term "indentured servitude", you're the one doing that. I didn't write this petition. How you can attribute the words of someone else to me is simply beyond me. I've already explained why parking tickets do not meet the same definition. To be charged for a parking ticket, you must be at fault. You agreed to pay to park in the space. If you violate that agreement by failing to pay, or overstayi…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:45 PM
6

I didn't claim it was slavery. I said it was analogous, which it is. I've called it indentured servitude from the beginning. I'm specifically talking about fraud here. The point is men get no say. You seem to be injecting a lot of presumptions into this discussion. Being force to pay a parking ticket requires prior fault. Paternity fraud does not. Paying to park on a ramp is a purchase. Paternity fraud is not. What makes this servile is that men are indentured through no fault of their own. I re…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:12 PM
7

No, you freely agree to a mortgage or any other contract. You also cannot be imprisoned for debts, except debts to women in the form of alimony and child support. In fact contract law has mechanisms to remedy unfair terms or other injustices which may arise - except for those two circumstances. In those circumstances there is no recourse, no remedy, no escape. Not even if you're completely free of fault. This is why it's servitude.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:52 AM
8

It's not quite the same as slavery where one is owned as property as you can own a horse or a dog. Indenture[d]: a contract binding one person to work for another for a given period of time. Servitude: a condition in which one lacks liberty especially to determine one's course of action or way of life. You are indentured by way of court enforcement which binds you to work for the mother for an extended period of time. If you refuse or simply cannot comply, you lose your assets and your freedom.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:38 AM
8

It is actually analogous. You're not "free" to make decisions as you please. A woman can rape a teenage boy and force him to pay for the resulting child. If he does not pay, he loses his freedom in prison. He loses his right to vote as a prisoner. He loses his property in liquidation to pay. This can even happen if the child is not yours, at the arbitrary whims of a woman putting your name on the birth certificate. I'd say indentured servitude is a more accurate description though. Either way it…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:22 AM
2

The problem is women cannot rape by the legal definition. Not sure about the US but that's the case in the UK. You require a penis to commit the crime, it's in the statute. Rape (1)A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents. So a woman can only sexually assault a man.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 03:35 AM
1

The healthcare issue is unique to the United States, but last time I checked Roe v Wade was still good law. Some eastern cultures are terrible to everyone, not just women. This has absolutely nothing to do with feminism in the west - even when this issue comes to the west. See the Rotherham rape scandal in England last year. A real world rape culture going on in a western, feminist country - an event feminists remained largely silent on. As you say, they're more interested in how men are sitting…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:30 AM
0

If by moderate, you mean the much vaunted dictionary definition of "legal equality," then feminism doesn't serve much purpose. The goal of "equal rights" has already been achieved. In fact, women now have more rights in law than men - so any measures to achieve "equal rights" would require more weight to the opposite scale. It's like calling yourself an abolitionist because you (presumably) oppose slavery. The term is redundant because slavery has already been abolished. The redundancy of femini…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:13 AM
5

This is so off the walls insane that I just can't accept the sincerity of the author. It's clickbait. She's talking about totalitarianism on a scale even North Korea would envy. Not even Tumblr feminists are this far detached from reality.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:07 PM
6

I've long wondered how this will pan out in future decades. One possibility is a role reversal. Men being more common homemakers and women being more common breadwinners - as it makes more sense for the higher earner to concentrate on career. An arrangement women will undoubtedly hate, especially when those divorce laws start backfiring on them regularly. That's even if women are willing to "marry down" - as we all know they're much more unwilling to do this. The numbers will simply force them i…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:26 AM
1

If you spent more than 5 minutes on the pavements of any major city you'd realise that this is completely at odds with observable reality, like most of feminist "theory".
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:05 AM
6

There aren't any mysterious barriers for them beyond those everyone else needs to face. It's a cutthroat popularity contest. Women just don't seem to be as interested in indulging in it. The fact that women remain the majority of the electorate means they control who gets into office when you examine it through this pointless gendered lens. If women want more female candidates, then they can start by becoming candidates themselves rather than complaining about it with internet memes. This is one…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter