So I go to a very large university in Canada. Long story short, it is extremely left and feminist driven. Nothing wrong with that, if they were fair. But to give you some background, I want to tell you about how biased it is.

I took a course, psychology of women. It's an easy A so I figured why not. But instead of learning about actual psychology of women, we learned about feminism and how men and women's brains do not differ at all. Baffling. The whole premise of this course was based around the assumption that every single difference in men and women's behaviour is down to social constructs. The way they came to these conclusions "scientifically" was that they literally changed the significance threshold. Yes you heard me. Apparently only correlations that are extremely high are significant and therefore everything was refuted. This is just to give you an idea of what kind of people are teaching my university.

But this is no surprise, and we can all take solace in the fact that evolutionary psychology proves this all wrong. Here's what really pissed me off, that relates to the title.

They introduced a policy to make LGbT an equity group. With the way my university is at up, LGbT is the one of the most over represented groups of all in terms of proportion, same with women (they outnumber men something like 3 to 1). Why the need to create an equity group? Now, the last represented group at my university? White straight males. Guess who are literally the only people who do not fall under an equity group? Yup you guessed it. White straight males. If this isn't discrimination I don't know what is.

Anyways that's the gist of it, don't feel like writing more but ask any questions if you want to know more or share your thoughts.