TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zyk0s Archive

View 19 posts and 2,920 comments by zyk0s on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
351

Red Pill Theoryzyk0s/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 04:43 PM
225

zyk0s/r/MensRights12/04/11 01:48 PM
140

Red Pill Theoryzyk0s/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 07:04 PM
90

Ask Red Pillzyk0s/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 06:01 PM
87

zyk0s/r/MensRights01/06/12 04:32 PM
72

Blue Pill Examplezyk0s/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 04:53 PM
44

zyk0s/r/MensRights11/09/11 12:37 AM
42

zyk0s/r/MensRights04/11/11 06:36 PM
31

zyk0s/r/MensRights16/04/11 02:32 PM
19

zyk0s/r/MensRights24/04/11 10:54 PM
18

zyk0s/r/MensRights22/02/11 04:55 AM
17

zyk0s/r/MensRights05/04/11 02:15 AM
11

zyk0s/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:51 AM
8

Fitnesszyk0s/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 04:45 PM
4

zyk0s/r/MensRights03/04/11 12:56 PM
3

zyk0s/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:48 PM
3

zyk0s/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:02 PM
0

zyk0s/r/MensRights02/12/10 09:41 PM
0

zyk0s/r/MensRights20/12/10 05:56 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,920 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Ideas are cheap, what matters is their execution, which I also file under having a valuable skill. Tell me, have you actually sold an idea? How much money did that make you?
/r/TheRedPill24/08/22 07:40 AM
3

Why don’t you tell us the other ways then? Because it seems to me that even as an entrepreneur, you are both being paid for the execution of a valuable skill (be it the product or service your company is selling, or the salesmanship itself) and the continued reinvestment of your capital.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/22 11:04 PM
10

I learned it, now I live it Couldn’t have said it better. That’s what we want for everyone who ever comes to the red pill, for them to internalize those lessons and then go live their lives to the fullest. Maybe a few can stay behind for a while to help out the next generation, but for everyone else, if it solved your problem, you would naturally move onto something else.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/22 08:37 PM
64

It’s true, so many things happened since the 2010s. The internet has gotten centralized and deanonymized, and TRP has had the eye of the mainstream place upon it. Even if someone with the writing skills of Dalrock, Rollo or Roissy were to appear, they could neither share their wisdom on a personal blog in their little quiet corner of the web, nor would they be able to separate that persona from their real identity. Now you have to be on TikTok and you have to put your name and face for all to se…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/22 05:50 PM
89

Glad to be remembered :) I still lurk here, just to see how things are going, the answer to which is almost always “pretty bad”. I only feel the need to comment when I see something extremely misguided, like here, the idea paying a dude to teach you “how to make money” could ever be a good idea.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/22 05:22 PM
198

A paid course that claims to teach you “how to make money” is almost always a scam. There are two ways to make money: develop a valuable skill and get paid to perform it, or invest capital you already have to make more of it. That’s it, no course required for that part. What may be a worthwhile course to spend money on is one that actually teaches you that in-demand skill or maybe rules and principles of investment. But none of those would be marketed to you as “how to make money”. They’d be tra…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/22 05:02 PM
11

The more you speak of her, the more red flags I see, in both of you. You say you “don’t see the point” in ending things with her. That’s the wrong way to think about it. You should be asking yourself “what’s the point” of staying with her. She’s a whore, beneath your SMV, makes poor decisions and has major emotional issues. The only reason you are keeping her is because she’s an easily accessible wet hole and you are too lazy to find something better. But you also make poor decisions, since you’…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/22 12:19 AM
6

Alright, let me rephrase that. A girl who is exclusive and is not a whore. If you don’t understand why that is important, you haven’t internalized the adage that past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior and that such a girl is very likely to jump in bed with some other dude for a a variety of reasons (better guy comes along, she gets drunk, she gets mad at you and wants to “hurt” you) Concerning the IUD: not a foolproof method but by far the safest option for you. First, it signals…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/22 11:53 PM
9

If you really hate condoms so much, do either those two things (wank it or stay celibate), or better yet find yourself a girl who is clean, exclusive and has an IUD. Anything else is unbelievably stupid, given you’re here and you have presumably heard about all the horror stories.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/22 11:20 PM
1

Yes, it’s absolutely fulfilling to be a parent, and you can tell that to women who want to have abortions btw. But why make things harder for yourself by sharing parenthood with someone you don’t want to have in your life? The Hail Mary approach is the natural male response to the current options available to women. If abortion was illegal, I’d be on board with chastising men who leave a woman they impregnated. Given the current state of affairs, it’s not only permissible, it’s actually the more…
/r/askTRP26/05/21 04:46 PM
36

That's how it started. But with time, being verified started to work like having a premium account. As it became more valuable and sought after, Twitter started "unverifying" people as punishment for "breaking community guidelines" (i.e. having the wrong opinions). As a result, apart from very high profile celebrities, everyone left with a blue checkmark is almost guaranteed to be a preacher of woke orthodoxy. It's not a myth, it's Twitter's actions that have morphed its meaning from "public per…
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:13 PM
1

How can you not like vetting? It’s not like it’s a choice. If you make the decision to let a girl be your girlfriend (as opposed to jumping straight into that dynamic right after sleeping with her), you are vetting her. Unless your interactions with her are limited to meeting up, banging and leaving straight away, you are going to learn aspects of her personality and her disposition towards you, and that’s the info you are going to use to determine if she’s supposed to be just a lay or something…
/r/askTRP28/02/21 11:33 PM
1

Here's an extension of that thought: it's your job to select a girl who doesn't behave in ways you don't like. That's what the vetting period is for, so you can filter out either the behaviors (it's possible she really is clueless but would cut it out if she knew it displeases you) or the girl. If you've vetted the girl, but she surprises you with that after you've promoted her to girlfriend, that's false advertisement on her part and you should have no qualms about demoting back to plate.
/r/askTRP28/02/21 10:02 PM
12

California recently decriminalized not disclosing you have HIV to a sexual partner. You can't really argue these two actions are done on principle with respect to STDs, it's clearly about who gets hurt by these laws. If it hurts homosexuals disproportionately (the previous one), then it's bad and it should be removed, if it hurts straight men (the one they're trying to pass), then it's good and should be enforced.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 06:04 PM
1

The problem with looking at it from a scientific point of view is that “you” don’t exist in that framework. “You” may at best exist as a group of cells in a partially delineated region of space at a given point in time, but that’s it. Similarly, “free” isn’t really a scientific concept, so the question wether we have free will is no more scientifically determinable than which girl is the most beautiful, what is moral and immoral, or for that matter wether you should bang this MILF whose husband …
/r/TheRedPill17/01/21 04:31 PM
3

I just want to add, make sure you’re in a state that only requires one party to consent to recording, otherwise you might be putting yourself at risk. If you do, record and send to the administration. If you don’t, simply write it down and send the transcript to the administration, it should be just as powerful.
/r/askTRP14/10/20 03:26 AM
2

You said “I could have been there in minutes”, not me. I understood it as meaning it was easy for you to go see her physically. If you meant something else by that, you need to express yourself better. I’ll put it simply: when she suggested phone sex, you should have suggested you going to see her instead if it was so easy to do. Or for her to come see you. Had she refused that, you should have said no to phone sex. My bet is that had you not been shy about your intentions, she would have let yo…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/20 03:50 PM
1

The point I was trying to make is that pushing then pulling would not have felt like a rejection. Women don’t handle sexual rejection well because, beyond the bruise to the ego, they feel completely powerless. If a woman want to bone you and you push her away, lashing out feels like the only thing left in her power. So you don’t reject the phone sex, you bid higher and go for real sex, and if she rejects that, she has only herself to blame. If you could have been there in minutes, you should hav…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/20 02:53 PM
7

That’s what the old “push-pull” was supposed to be about. She suggests phone sex, you push for real sex, if she refuses you pull back and don’t give her the phone sex. That makes her feel like she’s rejecting you and that she needs to give you something to get something. If she doesn’t want to give that something (sex), she’s simply not that into you. Sexting is for after you have already had sex, but can’t do it right now for logistical reasons: you’re out of town, there’s a lockdown, etc. The …
/r/TheRedPill01/10/20 12:51 PM
5

I read the "out" as a reference to pregnant women in general, how women are supposed to have a higher sex drive during pregnancy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/09/20 05:23 PM
2

Prostitution is not an either/or, it's a spectrum. You have your street workers, you have your porn stars, then your cam girls and e-thots, actresses of various degrees of skill and therefore required nudity on screen to make them get those roles, you have your garden variety instagram attention whores, the gold digger and sugar babies and finally you have women who get boyfriends/husbands who pay for stuff in exchange of regular sexual access. At the end of the day, almost all women exchange th…
/r/askTRP22/09/20 02:21 PM
1

That’s why I said you likely behaved like a beta, which is not necessarily a bad thing. I have no reason to not believe you would be intimidating to other men, but my point was about how you interact and relate to her. Let me highlight some things you wrote in the original post: Once that was done she asked me to leave for a little bit. I understood. We touched base a few times on Saturday but she obviously still needed space so I gave it to her. Sunday morning she asked me to meet her for brunc…
/r/askTRP01/07/20 01:40 AM
5

From the way he writes, it seems the guy behaved as the standard beta up to that point. And there lies the problem. Had he always been eager to get into fights, she would have known what sets him off, and predicted that incident since it would have been congruent with his past behavior. However, if he was always soft with her, seeing a "sweet guy" beat someone viciously can be a terrifying experience. She didn't think he was capable of that and realized she didn't know him at all. Could he do th…
/r/askTRP30/06/20 08:45 PM
6

The rule about power is so that you know what's going on and understand the dynamics. It's not an invitation to base the entire relationship on a power struggle. For one, it will quickly become exhausting, and sucks all the fun out of it. The stable equilibrium point tends to be where the man has a little bit more power (i.e. is a bit less invested) in the relationship than the woman. It is stable because an increase in her involvement will make you like her more, while if she starts acting up y…
/r/askTRP30/06/20 04:58 PM
2

Girls are dropping out of high school and college and getting money just by preying on desperate guys. Why would anyone envy these girls? They are damaging themselves. It is soft prostitution, and the ones dropping out are going to have a really hard awakening when the next cohort of younger women replaces them. Even if they somehow keep their reputation intact, they'll have no marketable skills and another 2/3rd of their lives in front of them. And that's not counting the psychological damage t…
/r/MensRights04/06/20 05:28 PM
1

First distribution, he didn't make it clear in the purchase of the images that they would be distributed Second contract, he broke the contract It is not his responsibility to disclose how he is going to use the images. The implicit assumption that they would be for personal use doesn't matter, unless she explicitly stated it it. There is no such thing as an implicit contract. Unless she can show it was explicitly stated, even verbally, that she specifically did not allow the use of those pictur…
/r/askTRP17/05/20 05:29 PM
6

If my goal is to be the lead singer of a heavy metal band and yours is to be a successful investment banker, we will attract different women. Very important point to make. TRP hammers the point of AWALT, but what "That" is may not be obvious to people. All women want a high value man, but the perception of value is in large part subjective (see economic theories of value). But the common part is, as you put it: a man with a strong frame, [...] a leader and man who puts his needs first A lot of e…
/r/askTRP07/01/20 04:28 PM
4

Which is still something she knew would get her attention. Good deed, but also THOTery. A whore with a heart of gold if you will.
/r/MGTOW05/01/20 09:07 PM
1

Young and impressionable is correct. I get it, we've seen the boom of tech empires in the last decade, and I'm sure this all seems like a great scheme: learn to program, make a successful startup, see cash raining down from the sky. Well I have some bad news for you. You are looking for a shortcut. No amount of work will guarantee you of financial freedom. There are only two things that are certain: if you start off with money, you may be able to make more money; and to win big, you need to risk…
/r/askTRP04/01/20 02:05 AM
4

The ones who did are not westerners, so there are confounding variables. But I think this is further evidence that waiting to be married before having sex does improve the chances of a strong marriage, provided this is actually the social norm. Religious Westerners (most Christians) are trying to push for remaining a virgin before marriage without understanding why it used to be like that and helped in the first place. In essence, the rule wasn't so much that you don't have sex before you're mar…
/r/MGTOW18/12/19 04:37 PM
2

It is a very, very stupid idea for women to go down that road. At least promise the guy you'll stay with him during hard times, even if you don't intend on keeping that promise. Because for men, there might be hard times, or there might just be your garden variety "I had a bad day" situations. For women, her becoming old and ugly, and therefore not appealing anymore, is a guarantee. All this one is doing is making sure she'll get dumped.
/r/MGTOW27/11/19 04:11 PM
1

You don't need to spin plates if you don't want to. To each their own, do what sits right with your conscious and your feeling of accomplishment, but also recognize how part of how you feel might have been social conditioning.
/r/askTRP22/11/19 04:46 AM
45

It’s a matter of restraint. Some women have more restraint than others. If she’s always held off on sex until a few dates in and has had few sexual partners, it means she has good self-restraint, not that she didn’t want to fuck those guys right after meeting them. It could also be that she hasn’t met many guys who would make her drop her panties with one look. Check the body language. If a woman tells you “I want to feel comfortable, within the bounds of a relationship” and is telling you this …
/r/TheRedPill18/11/19 04:56 PM
2

Would need more context about the situations you're talking about, like who these men are, where you interact with them, and what is your position with regards to them (boss, employee, client, friend). You also say "they might be afraid", "they will not respect me", has this happened or is that just you worrying of what could happen? My overall advice is that men respect your skills and your honest assessment of them. This means getting good at something (or preferably multiple things) and hones…
/r/askTRP15/11/19 01:41 PM
2

It's actually not that easy to fake confidence. It requires conscious effort for what is otherwise a subconscious process, regulated by hormones like serotonin. So social displays of confidence are a good indicator of someone possessing the skill, just like large breasts, wide hips and youthful skin are a good approximation of fertility. Evolution worked with those approximation, being able to fake the signals is a very new development. Now, as you pointed out, some people have unwarranted confi…
/r/askTRP15/10/19 04:10 PM
2

Trying To Be Perfect Act According To Others Giving Too Much Importance To Material Things Living In The Past Giving Too Much Importance To Social Status Lacking Humility And Seeking To Impress Others
/r/MGTOW15/10/19 12:57 PM
19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siren_(mythology)#Appearance Greek sirens were half women half bird like harpies. Pagan European folklore had mermaids (half women half fish) and the concept of mermaid and siren merged over time (mermaid in French is sirène), probably because the story of sirens luring Ulysses from a afar works just as well with mermaids sitting on said rock.
/r/MGTOW12/10/19 11:34 PM
4

Not even most of incels are omega. You have to have something seriously wrong with you to be classified as omega, I’d personally only reserve that label to people who are basically unredeemable. And a sizable portion of MGTOW are divorced men, so by definition they were at least beta.
/r/askTRP09/08/19 07:47 PM
26

Yup, there’s nothing wrong about wanting to talk about Jesus, waiting for marriage and the guy picking her up and paying on the first date, provided she is herself young, still a virgin, looking to marry soon and ready to cook, take care of the home and submit to her husband as her faith would dictate. But what are the odds she’s bringing any of those to the table?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/19 05:00 PM
3

some tallfag can just exist and be an instant slayer. Maybe by first realizing how deluded you are if you think that. Nobody is a slayer by existing. The average tall guy has to lift and learn game just like everyone else, maybe just less than you. But guess what, someone who’s gifted in maths still has to study the same subject as someone who isn’t, it just a bit easier and faster for him to learn. The same is true with pretty much every skill, God gave a head start to some, but everyone needs …
/r/askTRP28/07/19 10:47 PM
2

https://youtu.be/H5rasLWay7Y There’s a lot more Frank Reynolds in this life than you think.
/r/askTRP19/07/19 06:20 PM
4

Shaming language is like offensive language: the shame/offense is felt by the receiver. Short of using the words “you should be ashamed”, there is no objective standard for what is shaming language. But the girl felt ashamed (at least initially), so she deduced that it was shaming language. But this is actually a kernel of positivity, and koodos to u/missylizzy for trying to capitalize on it: she felt ashamed, she felt hurt, her instincts were trying to tell her something and maybe that’s enough…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/19 05:42 PM
7

There are confounding variables. Dalrock has been writing about this for the last decade. Essentially, desire to divorce is dictated by the belief your life will be better after it (fairly obvious, I know), so the risk correlates positively with number of premarital partners (impression of abundance), but negatively with age (younger women know they’ll have an easier time remarrying). He divided the data by age cohort, and saw exactly those trends.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/19 03:39 PM
9

The discrepancy in age is due to neither lying nor incompetence. It’s simply that the displayed age changes (computed from her stated birthday) while the description doesn’t if she doesn’t update it. Funnily enough, then stating their age in the description becomes a good way to gauge how long they’ve been on the market.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/07/19 09:38 PM
5

I’m really running out of ideas for how to explain this. This whole thing started with the concept of labor surplus, so let me define it. Men have the capacity to generate way more labor than would be required for their own survival, hence the term “surplus”. A bachelor can have a minimum wage job, and that will likely cover his rent, his food and he’ll have some extra for entertainment or whatever “own interests” he decides to pursue. So why do men bother producing more than they need, taking o…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/19 06:35 AM
9

You’ve answered your own question. Do you know many people whose interests include road maintenance, trucking and garbage disposal?
/r/TheRedPill11/07/19 05:49 AM
4

Not exactly. You share on average 50% of your genes with your child, the process of gene selection is random so it doesn’t deviate much. You could have 45% or 55%, but that’s already pretty unlikely. But the difference is much more pronounced between you and your sister. On average, you still have about 50% of the same genes, but it’s not that difficult to have 30% or 70%. When you look at nieces and nephews, it is again 25% on average, but could be as low as 10% with good enough probability. Th…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/19 05:59 PM
7

The infrastructure to make those technological advancements is maintained almost exclusively by men. Female medical researchers are not going to be doing much lab work if there are no safe roads to get there and if the trains aren’t running. There hasn’t been, in known human history, a single that has successfully attained the level of civilization (I’m taking about the strict anthropological definition) that was not based on marriage and severely punished female infidelity, the best method peop…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/19 03:26 PM
10

These technological advancements are not just scientific discoveries that, once written in enough books, are safeguarded for future generations. They require constant labor to maintain. There’s lots of examples of technological decline in societies throughout history, so it wouldn’t be a first.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/19 01:50 PM
14

You still have the social pressure to raise another man’s children. If you have nephews and nieces, I’m sure you love spending time with them and role modeling for them, but you’ll never feel the same sense of obligation and dedication as you would with your own kids. No paternal certainty, no paternal investment. No paternal investment, no male labor surplus. No male labor surplus, no civilization. I’m sure it sounds good to you, but if western societies went that way, you can say goodbye to mo…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/19 01:40 PM
3

No. Technology and prosperity give people the ability to delay and sometimes completely remove negative consequences from poor actions. When a society preaches a certain mode of conduct, and those who go against it suffer publicly as a result, the faith of the average person is strengthened. Conversely, if they observe that nothing bad happens to people who go against social norms or even that it benefits them, that average person will stop believing in its society moral code. This happened with…
/r/askTRP26/06/19 04:16 PM
6

You know, maybe persuading you not to go for single mothers is actually the author's intention. The reaching for the words "disgusting", "offensive" and "outrageous" makes me think this could only have been written by a clueless feminist single mother herself, or a woman who loathes single mothers. The latter knows that she has to superficially pander to a crowd of angry women, lest they start screeching all over the internet, but that once those shallow egos are reassured that yes, of course, s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/19 02:50 AM
40

People (both acquaintances and men I've dated) have said that I'd make a good girlfriend/wife/mother, but in the most recent case of the FWB it was with the subtext of "but not for me". Where have I heard that one before?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/19 02:35 AM
3

Hey, whatever let’s you cope with the trauma of knowing you’ll never experience what real sex feels like. We’re all sorry for you though.
/r/MGTOW05/06/19 05:30 PM
1

Women who are poor or lack marketable skills will be more interested in how much money you make. Women who already make money won’t care as much about your bank account, but they will want a man they can be comfortable to be seen with in their social circle. That’s why you get the female doctor/lawyer with the male painter/photographer couples. As long as you’re not a bum or in a no-skill minimum wage job, you should be fine. She will be more concerned about your social status and how you make h…
/r/askTRP30/05/19 06:21 PM
7

Is this the only 7 or above girl in a 100 mile radius? If not, why are you wasting time on someone who clearly does not want to go out alone with you instead of using it to find someone who does?
/r/askTRP23/05/19 09:27 PM
1

That’s a much better question. I’m not that well read on philosophy, but I’m sure it’s a topic that’s been argued to hell and back. So I’ll just make a few observations that may not be connected, you’ll have to see where that leads you. First, I think all schools of thought can agree that calling something immoral is essentially saying that that behavior, were it allowed in society, would lead to bad outcomes. It could be conflict, it could be pain, it could be the integrity of a soul. So how ca…
/r/askTRP22/05/19 06:53 PM
1

The fuck kind of question is that? “Is it okay” is usually reserved for when you’re asking someone specific if they want to go along with whatever you plan on doing. “Is it okay if I turn the heat up?”, “Is it okay if we have pizza for dinner”. What you really want to ask is “Is it moral?”.
/r/askTRP22/05/19 05:59 PM
53

There’s also the logical inconsistency everybody involved seemed to not have noticed: the husband who pays his wife $3.5k a month would have paid that to a nanny, yes, but that would free up the wife to go and earn money. Not to mention that those $3.5k are pre-tax for the nanny, and go towards paying rent and food. How the dude does not realize how he’s being completely exploited is a testament to the power of the frame.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/19 05:40 PM
40

A law professor once told us, there are two places you should try to avoid going to unless absolutely necessary: the hospital and the courtroom. Winning a court case is nice, but not as nice as not being in court in the first place.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/05/19 05:59 PM
8

Yeah, I don’t post much, sometime I speak up in askTRP when some really idiotic idea takes hold of a thread. I had completely forgotten about that study, I’m not going to make a separate post, but here’s a link if anyone’s interested (prepend reddit and r, bot won’t let me post otherwise): TheRedPill/comments/3e37j2/german_guy_on_8chanpol_explains_workplace/
/r/TheRedPill07/05/19 05:12 PM
15

The data clearly shows age of marriage to have been increasing in a rather steady way since the sexual revolution. Meanwhile, the economy has seen all sorts of ups and downs during the same period. If anything, I think it’s the other way around: the fucked up economy (which is starting to do better now btw) can be partly traced to the sexual revolution.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/19 04:07 PM
4

I’ll add MRA: I want to change the rules of the game MGTOW: I don’t want to play the game PUA: I want tricks to win the game Red Pill: I want to learn the game But they all recognize that the game is not what it is made to be.
/r/askTRP25/04/19 06:23 PM
1

That’s a good point. I’d first get my levels checked though, it wouldn’t surprise me if the T levels of people here weren’t that much lower than the average for a few decades ago.
/r/askTRP22/04/19 11:35 PM
1

I don’t know if you’ll necessarily have higher standards of living. If you’re just not as interested in pursuing girls, then having more/better girls doesn’t improve your standard of living. It also depends on wether you’re removing your last years, or hitting them sooner. I don’t much care to be alive between the ages of 85 and 90. It would suck if I felt like the average 85 year old man at age 70.
/r/askTRP22/04/19 11:30 PM
5

The scientific evidence seems to indicate that higher levels of testosterone reduce a man’s life expectancy. If that is true, then trading off a higher interest in banging lots of girls for a decade of your life may or may not be appealing, but it’s certainly not clear cut. I for one feel there’s a lot more that I want to do on this Earth than increasing my notch count.
/r/askTRP22/04/19 08:06 PM
23

Why would that be insulting? If you see an Olympic athlete failing after having won gold 5 years prior, calling him “past his prime” is not an insult, it’s just a factual observation. Same with a band that used to top charts and now can’t get a concert in a decent venue. There is no malice there, just the recognition that youth is fleeting.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/19 08:49 PM
1

Exactly. Questions invite the person to continue the conversation, statements end it. You want to end the topic in your favor, making the person who challenged you look bad in the process.
/r/askTRP15/04/19 05:35 PM
1

For an AA answer, you could go with “yeah, miles of it”. But like I said, since all of this is done through text, with a larger audience to boot, even the best AA may not work as well, and the topic of dick sucking is tricky enough. So a more direct answer, like the “know the feeling, eh?” suggested above, or “Hey <girl’s name>! My bad, I should have asked you directly” or something else to that effect: implying she knows what she’s talking about without implying you do.
/r/askTRP15/04/19 04:21 PM
6

A&A works when the claim is so outrageous it cannot possibly be taken seriously. The girl then has no choice but to admit you’re treating her like a child, and feels like she needs to work to get you to treat her seriously again. So easy, ask yourself: is it possible for her (or a neutral party) to consider what you said to be serious? In this case, “I’ve sucked almost as many dicks as you” is not outside the realm of possibilities, so it’s not a good A&A. It’s also worth pointing out that A&A w…
/r/askTRP15/04/19 03:52 PM
9

She says she likes drama and talking about gossip. What does she want? She told you. She likes to be used for sex and cheated on. Why are you listening to her problems and paying for a trip to Vegas?
/r/askTRP08/04/19 11:18 PM
17

He’s right that a man is better off with a family, and he is right you should get married before having a family. The problem is... men can’t get married anymore. A necessary feature of marriage is the “til death do us part” portion, the availability of no fault divorce removes that component and makes marriage impossible. Everyone calls it marriage still, but it is a different institution altogether, just like online movie purchases and purchasing a physical book are similar looking but fundame…
/r/askTRP03/04/19 10:43 PM
1

Through your looks and by being forward and arranging to meet her sooner than the other guys.
/r/askTRP06/03/19 01:38 AM
3

Maybe “I am the prize” is not entirely the way to look at it. Women use the “I am the prize” mentality and it works for them: men chase after them, they adore themselves to make “the prize” shinier, heck, you’ll see hot women displayed next to the literal prizes of TV game shows. TRP’s “I am the prize” mantra is primarily about countering women’s natural tendency towards it, a kind of “no, I am the prize” if you will. I would suggest thinking “I am the champion” instead. A prize has no agency, i…
/r/askTRP01/03/19 09:02 PM
8

Blue pill: “I don’t understand the game, but I’m going to play it the way society has told me to” Red pill: “I understand the game, and know I’ve been sold a lie” MRA: “I want to change the rules of the game” MGTOW: “I don’t want to play a rigged game” TRP: “I want to learn how to use the rules of the game to my benefit”
/r/askTRP01/03/19 06:11 PM
9

Jealousy would have made a man possessive and driven him to murder his wife’s lover and their bastards, giving an advantage to his own kids. It’s not hard to imagine how this would be a stronger evolutionary pressure than the loss of attraction a woman would feel towards her husband if he was being too possessive. Also, women do like to feel that their man is jealous of them (as opposed to really not caring), just not to the point he becomes a whiny bitch about it. There’s a reason harems we’re …
/r/askTRP01/03/19 12:40 AM
7

No, it’s bad CSS (layout and formatting) that wasn’t tested on mobile size screens. Thankfully, a lot of mobile browsers have a text reader mode for cases like this.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/19 01:50 AM
5

That part was funny. At her age, Gonzalez said, she feels much more confident in who she is — a trait, she said, that younger men find appealing. My mom said this, too. She frequently matched with men 10 to 15 years younger than her because, she said, she was able to "hold a conversation." They aren’t wrong, in my experience too, older women are better at holding a conversation. But it has nothing to do with “confidence” or “knowing who you are”. It’s just that younger women are so used to men d…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/02/19 02:40 PM
11

Yeah, I was too generous with my assumption. Better get that DNA test.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/02/19 06:04 PM
18

He said he had three children, and that the oldest two are from her previous marriage, so the last one is his. I hope he wins full custody of his kid, and leaves her with the other two. Sucks for those boys, but what are you gonna do?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/02/19 04:29 PM
12

Not at the last possible moment. You missed the part where she says she has a 23 year old who is “out on her own”. She is simply the older version of the ~20yo women we see here pregnant and “looking for a good man”. She got knocked up at 19, spent most of her life raising that kid and hooking up, seemed to have learned her lesson and stayed on birth control all this time. Then, at around 38, when she kicked out her first kid out of the house (or the kid left), she decided “now I can settle down…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/02/19 06:26 PM
1

Why does someone get tattooed? I can identify 3 main reasons: they are young and do it out of rebellion, to spite their parents they are profoundly dissatisfied with their body to the point they feel like modifying it preeminently they stay in social circles where having tattoos is common, and they succumb to peer pressure Women in the first category will be very promiscuous, the rebellious and risk seeking personality usually pushes them to have lots of (unprotected) sex. Even for a quick lay, …
/r/askTRP04/02/19 07:50 PM
1

Predatory Unless the activity you engage in is a cooperatively negotiated one (which sexual attraction definitely is not), you’re going to either be a predator or a prey. Make your choice. Psychopathic It’s one of the Dark Triad traits, and that’s what women are attracted to.
/r/askTRP25/01/19 09:12 PM
2

I didn’t want to be too negative, but I agree with you. The scientific method requires the gathering and interpretation of data, Myers-Briggs is purely theoretical.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/01/19 07:35 PM
8

It’s been deprecated in favor of OCEAN, aka the Big 5. There’s unfortunately not much science in Myers-Briggs.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/01/19 06:35 PM
1

Here’s a different way of looking at it: marriage does not exist in the West. I know you want to get married, but you can’t. That’s absurd, you’ll tell me, people get married all the time! The truth is that people “get married” in the same way people “buy” music online. Words used to have meaning. The verb “to buy” is supposed to imply an acquisition of ownership, and that once you completed the transaction, no matter what happens to the seller, that item is yours. Well we know this isn’t the ca…
/r/askTRP23/01/19 12:22 AM
5

I’m sure you got points for being honest. Stay honest with him, and be as feminine as you can. I know you didn’t get a good role model, so maybe it won’t come naturally. Be pleasant to be around, that means smile, don’t nag and make him feel masculine. You might just make yourself stand out enough that he’ll want to stick around.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/01/19 02:40 AM
3

I want it to go further but I don't know if I've already fucked it up by hooking up with him so early. This is something that I wish women would finally understand, so I'm going to try to make it as explicit as possible. It is not the sleeping on the first date that makes men not want you for a relationship, it is your partner count If men could have their way, they'd love to have a low n-count woman so infatuated with them particularly that she drops her panties on the first night. But with no …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/01/19 01:43 AM
21

The dumb ones get knocked up carelessly. The type of women who go to these parties are smart (albeit not wise) career professionals who either take their pill with perfect care or get an IUD. Even if they do have an accident, they’d sooner get 10 abortions than accept any interruption to their glorious career.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/01/19 04:40 PM
2

The message would only be a bit cheesy if they both were as "in love" for the other. But even from the back, their body language is telling. She looks up, not lovingly but with an expression I could only call half defiant and half disappointed. If you look at him, you understand why. He's leaning away from her, his hands in front of his stomach/privates in a clear defensive stance. What you can guess of his expression seems to be unease bordering on fear. If I had to put voice bubbles over them,…
/r/MGTOW19/01/19 11:37 PM
136

This 30 year old woman just discovered that making consent the unique determining factor of whether a given sexual contact should be socially acceptable is inadequate. This model surprisingly does not take into account the feelings of the parties involved when one decides to leave. She feels that there should be a different standard, one where people agree to sex on the condition the other person does not leave, continues caring for them and having sex with them. In her words, it would make sex …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/12/18 12:48 AM
35

It is an allegory for the rationalization process. The hamster runs in its wheel, thinking it’s getting somewhere but effectively always staying in the same place. The faster it runs, the more it thinks it’s makingnprogress, but it simply exhausts itself faster.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/11/18 06:14 PM
44

It doesn’t get mentioned that often, because it feels so obvious for us guys, but I guess it needs restating: there is a world difference between widows and “single moms”. In fact, when people talk about single moms here, it should be clear they are speaking of single mother by choice, which include women who got knocked up with a random dude/guy who did not offer commitment and women who ejected their man from the home. Maybe we need a new word to distinguish them from widows, but the latter ar…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/18 07:35 PM
30

Tell a woman you used to have sex with men when you were young and confused, but you’re not like that anymore, and watch how fast “who I slept with in the past shouldn’t matter” argument disappear.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/11/18 08:43 PM
20

How do you imagine it working, exactly? The kid is there, she’s not going away, and if you get involved with the mom the kid certainly will see every single interaction you have with the woman as “mommy and daddy”. It’s like if a man was unable to work, and a woman tried to discuss how she can’t be supporting him. If she gets involved, her support role is inevitable, and just like with being the stepdad of a bastard, the only way out is to not get involved.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/10/18 05:30 PM
7

you would think that the younger one would look no farther than 10cm away and see her future if she follows this path. I think she does. Look at her expression when the old one is talking. The 22 yo is very uncomfortable, it seems to be a mix of disbelief that the producers would dare put a hottie like herself next to this old woman, as if they had anything in common, and the beginning of the realization that they do might in fact have something in common, and the horrible prospect that she is i…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/18 12:52 PM
1

I thought this part was funny: As a transgender woman, Jara has dealt with a wide variety of clients. Men have demanded free sex, fetishized and discriminated against her for being trans, and disregarded her sexual parameters. Some men hired a trans prostitute specifically because that’s their kink, while others refused to hire a trans prostitute because that wasn’t their kink. How dare they!
/r/MGTOW19/09/18 11:09 PM
9

Drugs, clubs, dressing like a bitch and such are part of the strategy to that end. Do you seriously believe that? That it’s part of a conscious strategy? Or is it closer to what the guy you replied to said: they want to have fun, they are following what popular girls their age do, the get high on attention and the drinks/drugs they can get for free. Hot men are at the clubs because the hot chicks go there, not the other way around. If they really wanted to “fuck, and possibly secure high value m…
/r/askTRP17/09/18 11:46 PM
1

Because of this, Ryan and I saw each other a grand total of four times before I left, and I left just as we were actually starting to get to know each other. In the four months, they “saw each other” four times. I’ll translate: Ryan has regular sex with hotties all the time. When they were unavailable (menstruation, travel, plate drop), he hit her up because she was decent enough, put out, and wasn’t too difficult about it. He also put even less effort in his aloofness at the end because he knew…
/r/MGTOW17/09/18 04:28 PM
3

You need to realize something. Being fat is not just sexually unappealing, it’s a marker of laziness. And laziness is a facet of your personality. That’s not something that can be easily changed, especially not through outside influence. You can dangle a carrot (pun intended) in front of her and you’ll see some progress if she’s into you, but that will be temporary, and the moment something changes in your life or hers, makes it a bit more stressful or complicated, it’s back to the old habits, a…
/r/askTRP06/09/18 06:49 PM
1

There are no shortcuts in life. Fashion sense might be easy to fix for some, difficult for others. Some find it easy to include gym time in their schedule, others struggle. Figure out where you’re lacking and improve those dimensions, but by bit. It is probably a good idea to put the most effort into the aspects where you are the most behind, other than that, there are no magic recipes.
/r/askTRP06/09/18 05:07 PM
4

You know how women want a beast with the heart of gold, the bad boy who is just really a good guy inside? That’s what you’ve displayed. Not only is this not going to affect you negatively, it is going to be a positive for your relationship. You’ve also given her the opportunity to be your emotional anchor in this one instance, a reversal of the normal roles, and that was her chance to give back. And yes, just take it easy, take enough time to grieve and good luck man.
/r/askTRP05/09/18 04:16 AM
1

Who said anything about proof? The question of free will has been debated for centuries by very capable philosophers, and no definitive logical proof was reached either way, which makes me personally think that is is not solvable logically. So you have a choice, belief in it or belief in the opposite. The former, like I just said, is a requirement for believing and implementing everything this community discusses. The latter leads to nihilism and stagnation. To me, the practical implications are…
/r/askTRP03/09/18 02:52 PM
1

Without free will, there is no personal responsibility. Believing in free will is a precondition for accepting anything TRP stands for.
/r/askTRP03/09/18 02:44 PM
57

It was pretty clear from the start. Nobody gets this hateful, this angrily fixated on something for no reason. In her case, she got her heart broken, repeatedly, by the type of men she chased, and since she had enough self-awareness to realize their common trait was their race (what she was seeking out), she decided that was the root of her misery, and extrapolated it must also be the world’s.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/08/18 12:45 PM
11

That’s the problem, their model of the world does fit in 140 characters: “women are superior, if we educate them they’ll solve everything”. But the world is much more complex than that, and we seem unable to learn that a centrally dictated simplistic solution to a major issue always comes with unintended consequences.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 05:34 PM
45

This is the most effective way to ensure that the countries that are starting to improve their economic situation get completely destroyed. By giving educational opportunities to women and not men, you’re creating a pool of women who cannot possibly find a husband with whom they’ll be satisfied, and a pool of destitute and celibate men. Because of the lack of infrastructure like the one you see in western countries, the educated women who do get married will have to chose between having kids and…
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 05:27 PM
10

He’s right, terminating a fetus is not murder. Except when it’s done by someone other than the pregnant woman or her abortion provider, then the fetus magically becomes a valuable human life and it absolutely is murder. So essentially, it depends on the woman’s feelings, ain’t that great?
/r/MGTOW28/06/18 08:08 PM
2

To be fair, she’s the one he’s talking to, so the advice is for her. And he’s right that marriage works in her favor. Now if the guy called, and said “I don’t have debts, I have $80,000 saved”, then it would be a different discussion.
/r/MGTOW14/06/18 02:34 AM
10

Actually, she doesn't say she wants someone who is family oriented or financially stable. She mentioned "financially stable" as a requirement for having kids, which is a "when" for her. In other words, she is simply looking for AF at this point, and either thinks he'll stick with her and morph into BB, or she'll just move on to one who is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/06/18 04:59 PM
4

I think it has something to do with the fact that copyright ownership is transferable as inheritance in case of death. Like when the family of dead artists retain the copyright and can collect royalties. So it would only apply here if the wives were to die.
/r/MGTOW09/06/18 02:45 PM
6

For the real schadenfreude, notice that this article is dated April 2013, that's over 5 years ago. By all accounts, the author is still single, she just hasn't been writing about being single in the past year.
/r/MGTOW29/05/18 05:11 AM
14

It’s not overly girlz powah, but they obviously couldn’t help themselves. One of the badass antagonists is revealed to be a frightened teenage girl fighting for the resistance, so there’s that, but the main female protagonist is too much of a confused mess to be empowering. The movie is just fan service with too many plot holes to count, while remaining entirely predictable. It’s a nice spectacle, and I’ve definitely seen worse, but had I paid for my ticket, I would have wanted my money back.
/r/MGTOW27/05/18 06:12 AM
5

Everyone is saying this is backwards. It's not, she's is absolutely right. If a woman cannot passively attract a man, there is something seriously wrong with her appearance. If a woman cannot keep a man, there is something seriously wrong with her behavior. On the other hand, women are attracted to confidence, so a man who believes he deserves a woman will exude the confidence that will eventually make women interested in him.
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 02:22 AM
8

Instead of “activism”, maybe call the axis something like “social focus” or “desire for social change”. Incels aren’t really activists, as someone else pointed out. Also, PUAs are quite different from TRP, they don’t even belong in the picture. They are satisfied with superficial tricks, and don’t really dare to break from the narrative.
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 12:43 AM
1

mgtow the only winning move is not to play. Yes, that is the definition of MGTOW, and I refuse to play the game with the rules as they currently stand. But I have to acknowledge that every civilization that ever emerged did so with a patriarchal, monogamy-based marital family unit. And I like to have nice things, so I still thing marriage, as it was practiced in the past, must have been at least preferable to the alternatives. The problem is what we have today is marriage only by name. I like to…
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 02:53 PM
1

I said I’d cut support. This might include separating from her and let her live on her own and pay for her own things, depending on the situation. But there’s no divorce, she can’t remarry and she can’t take half of my assets. This arrangement alone should make her too scared to even contemplate cheating.
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 02:42 PM
2

I agree it comes down to cost, but cost is relative and not binary, so a clear boundary is difficult to define. Also, having an expectation of marriage used to be called an engagement, it involved her not sleeping around and not accepting courtship from other guys. A girl can expect whatever she wants from me, doesn’t mean she’s going to get it. Even if you tell them you’re never going to marry, they still think they can rope you in. Then it depends on you, whether you let yourself be tricked in…
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 02:39 PM
0

Stay with her for the good of the children, but otherwise deprive her of my support and assets, so that if she wants nice things, she has to bust her ass. Take up a younger, hotter mistress. There’s a reason adultery was treated as a crime.
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 02:32 PM
2

He hasn’t been on the dating market since he married his wife over 25 years ago. He is right about marriage the same way a person is right about saying “eating vegetables is good for your health”, in the abstract, it’s just that we’re pointing out the vegetable garden has been poisoned by mercury. I’d consider marrying if I lived in a country that does not recognize divorce.
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 12:54 PM
2

Depends, what exactly defines a relationship? With marriage, it’s easy: before the vows and the signing of documents, you’re not married, after, you are. But a relationship? There are no formal criteria, no agreed upon rules (which is one of the reasons relations between the sexes are so fucked). If you have the same girl you’re sleeping with for a few months, is that a relationship or “friends with benefits”? Does rewarding her with taking her out every once in a while make you a chump, if she …
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 12:47 PM
2

Median is the halfway point between the highest earner and the lowest. Median is actually the value that splits your population into two halves: 50% below and 50% above. You got it right in your example.
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 08:00 PM
7

Indeed, worker bees are asexual, their model is one female able to spawn thousands of eggs, a few males and a majority of workers. Humans, with a uterus used for gestating one offspring for 9 months, cannot possibly follow that model.
/r/MGTOW14/05/18 07:52 PM
17

It's ok because right now, as a man in my twenties, I think I would like a girl one or two years younger than me, but later on in life I'll definitely like the girls who are 10 to 15 years younger than me.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/18 06:42 PM
24

I am one of the 18 percent of American women between the ages of 40 and 44 who are childless. [...] half of this group has chosen that fate; they are childfree by choice. And the rest of us, about one million American childless women ages 40 to 44, suffer from biological or circumstantial infertility. Nah mate, you got your groupings wrong. It’s not childfree vs. “biological + circumstantial”. It is biological (i.e. infertile) vs. “by choice”. It’s just that the childfree women made their choice…
/r/MGTOW08/05/18 02:40 PM
2

Confidence may come from being handsome, but it most often than not comes from mastery. And mastery comes with time and practice. If you get good at something, you will become confident. It's not something you can easily fake, so of course "just have confidence" is completely bullshit advice. Instead, it should be: "focus on developing yourself and getting good at something, take pride in it and you will gain confidence".
/r/MGTOW05/05/18 04:05 AM
2

So I've been at it for some time, and I can't seem to find anything written on the topic. Like I said, from what I remember it was only one of the various theories associated with the idea of free love and the class struggle, and it fell apart pretty quickly for obvious reasons. Maybe that's why nobody has written about it, or maybe I am just dreaming up things. Regardless, I stands to reason that someone at some point in the past thought to apply the communist ideas of redistribution of resourc…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/18 03:55 AM
6

Well the reality is that the rationale always follows the feelings. At the time, they didn’t like the idea of having any duty to engage in sex of their hearts weren’t 100% into it, so the rationalization was to shift sexual morality from the marriage model to the concept of consent. It’s only now, with sexbots, that their rationale no longer works. They feel that men having sex with a robot is wrong, so they need to amend their theory in some way. So far, it’s increasingly incoherent, but maybe …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/18 08:49 PM
5

I remember a movie from the 60s that dealt with this topic. That perspective didn’t last very long, so it’s not discussed much. I’ll try to find some historical sources later today, when I have a bit more time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/18 07:25 PM
29

doesn't it follow that the "Sexual Bourgeoisie" have some obligation to "share their undeserved sexual excess" with the members of the "Sexual Proletariat?" This was actually the perspective of early utopian socialist, that marriage should be abolished and women had a duty to have sex with the most destitute members of the proletariat. Of course, the women quickly realized that they did not like giving away sex for nothing, especially not to poor men, so the feminists moved to the theory of cons…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/18 04:33 PM
1

I never said that improving yourself is focusing on what women find attractive. You having your shit together is a good in of itself, the fact that women find this attractive is not incidental, but it is a secondary concern. For instance, if riding a motorcycle isn’t your thing, don’t do it to get pussy. But bring in shape, carrying yourself with confidence, having a good status at your job (especially being your own boss) are things you should aspire to. It’s like telling a fat chick who’s mise…
/r/MGTOW04/05/18 03:07 PM
7

It’s actually a pretty good idea. Improve yourself, make your life so great that all the women around you think you are marriage material. Then just don’t get married.
/r/MGTOW04/05/18 03:56 AM
2

When she says power moved to "men", she means "high status men" Exactly, with that substitution, her analysis is pretty good. But this blind spot prevents any rectification of the situation. If you do not understand how unchecked female hypergamy operates, any attempt at compensating for the harm women suffer under the new rules will penalize regular men, benefit the high-status ones, and eventually harm women the most. That’s exactly what has been happening ever since the sexual revolution. The…
/r/MGTOW03/05/18 08:29 PM
4

It’s even more than that. Taking responsibility is to stop complaining about the tragedy of life, and actively trying to improve your situation. Accepting a raw deal from other people and making yourself more vulnerable is not taking responsibility, it’s volunteering for victimhood.
/r/MGTOW03/05/18 01:53 PM
12

Which is exactly why these companies are doing that. They figure they will be called sexist no matter what they do, so might as well get something out of it.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 05:15 PM
1

Let’s not be petty, I’d rather as many people knew about it, so as many people could be happy with their lives. At the same time, it’s not like this is some secret knowledge and feminist have never been presented with this option, they’re just too proud to let go of their worldview, even if they know it just makes them miserable.
/r/MGTOW25/04/18 06:16 PM
1

Funny she didn’t mention one of the obvious thing the vocal fry does: it makes a girl sound unfeminine, if not outright masculine. You know how when you hear a little child talk, boy or girls, they have this pure, high pitched voice that makes them appear cute and vulnerable, and makes you want to protect them from harm? The same happens with women, and that’s one way women can activate the protector instinct in men. Them actively trying to destroy it is hilarious.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 02:38 PM
2

This is not a study, it is a poll. And I'm not sure what it's trying to prove. Are bisexual women not more promiscuous and confused? If they aren't and are just perceived that way, why not say so? The study also indicates that educating individuals about bisexuality could reduce stereotyping. Why attempt to reduce a stereotype that is not inaccurate?
/r/becomeaman04/04/18 03:35 PM
1

A knee high dress and short sleeves are perfectly fine for a young lady. A see-through piece of cloth hanging from her tits isn’t, in my estimation, but you go and raise your daughter however you like.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 08:31 PM
1

A street walker must have a perfectly appropriate attire then, since it doesn’t show any genitalia. I’m really starting to feel sorry for your daughter.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:53 PM
1

So you do think that the above is perfectly fine for a 14yo girl to wear, and won’t sexualize her in any way? Someone will indeed need counseling when they realize the person who was supposed to set proper boundaries so she could have a healthy development into adulthood failed her. It won’t be me though.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:48 PM
0

Read my comment again. If you think this is appropriate for a 14yo to wear at school, stop pretending she’s there to learn and at least admit you want her to have slept with the entire football team by age 16.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:51 PM
-1

when did 14 year old shoulders become so unbelievably sexy that even teachers need to be sheilded from their wrath? I can see two possible ways your daughter could have had her shoulder exposed: either she was wearing a sleeveless top, or her top was basically hanging from her breasts, exposing her neck, chest and shoulders. If the former, she needs a better fashion sense, if the latter, you should ask yourself why you want your 14yo daughter to dress like a slut.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:44 PM
1

I’d argue you’re not really nihilistic if you embrace responsibility. You believe in the value of whatever you’re building, that spending time and effort on it is preferable to other activities.
/r/MGTOW30/03/18 02:39 PM
1

It appears they are trying to return to the old days of courtship, where women would allow themselves to be courted by multiple men, and so if a man found a girl he liked, he would feel pressure to propose before another suitor did. What they don’t seem to understand is that this type of courtship involved taking to and spending (sometimes semi supervised) time with each other, not having sex.
/r/MGTOW24/03/18 03:40 PM
12

Pretty much. Also, merely touching a cop is enough for you to be charged with assault of an officer, while you need a high bar to prove use of unnecessary force to charge a cop. What she experienced here is merely injury while resisting arrest, which is entirely her fault.
/r/MGTOW21/03/18 11:44 PM
18

“Saving you for later” is a very common attitude, even in girls far away from the wall, so it’s not like it’s a calculated move (that would be giving them too much credit). And of course, women don’t see what’s wrong with it, even though it is quite simple: the opposite of “saving you for later”, i.e. what they should expect to get for playing that game, is “using you for now”.
/r/MGTOW11/03/18 05:17 PM
36

If my desire to start my own family, and not subsidize an existing one, leads me to die alone, so be it. But I find it rather funny that some stranger's dating preferences would offend you so much. If they are so extreme, you should have no problem finding a good man to take care of you and your husband's kids. Someone normal, who believes a woman the moment she utters the word 'abuse', and reject the idea that the character of her previous partners may be a sign of her poor judgement. Finding s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/18 01:26 AM
45

Yes, or be with someone substandard. In the age of birth control, abortion and legal surrender, being a (non-widow) single mom is a choice, and a pretty shitty one at that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/18 01:07 AM
33

The military has been the most effective tool to reduce poverty and improve social mobility. Not only do the poor people who join get an education they otherwise could not afford, they also learn the discipline that makes them better at managing money and staying out of poverty. There’s a price to pay for everything, but it really does more good than not.
/r/MGTOW27/02/18 05:28 AM
3

Because it wasn't a scam, they were not exploited. At worst, you could say the people involved knew how to persuade young impressionable girls, but that's really no different than a skilled salesman getting you to buy all the options when you stepped into the dealership swearing you'll buy the base model. Like many others have said, being an actress is only a degree of prostitution, the only difference between these girls and whatever young meat is popular in Hollywood these days are the camera …
/r/MGTOW04/01/18 01:41 PM
1

Vivaldi is based on Chrome too. It can install Chrome extensions and I think the user agent it reports says “Chrome”.
/r/MGTOW17/12/17 04:51 PM
3

Actually, in Iraq they started using gold for transactions after the fall of Saddam's regime. However, I do agree with them trading with physical goods. Yes, because only Iraq's infrastructure fell, not the rest of the world's. Bitcoin is decentralized, there are miners in a lot of different countries. The whole system shutting down would imply that the internet as a whole shut down. The problem is that we can still mine gold. Sure we'll have to travel to an asteroid but we can still mine it. An…
/r/MGTOW27/11/17 04:52 PM
1

What happens to your Bitcoins when the infrastructure fails? The infrastructure failing would imply the internet as a whole failed. At that point, I don't think even gold would be a good currency, people would be trading in food and water. What happens when there are no more coins that can be mined? Same thing that happens when there is no gold left to be mined: you trade in existing tenders. Mining volume is designed to decrease asymptotically. What happens when there are no more people willing…
/r/MGTOW27/11/17 03:35 PM
15

Japan went through probably the fastest and most dramatic social transformation of any country. A quick glance at their history will show you why. They went from a completely closed country for centuries, keeping a medieval social structure well into the XIXth century, to a brief period of opening up to being nuked twice and forcibly westernized. As a result, they kept a very rigid spirit of social duty (applies primarily to concepts of politeness and work, but also to the responsibilities of hu…
/r/MGTOW13/10/17 12:55 PM
1

I don't know the details of Diana, but if I had to guess, I would say that Camilla got there first, and managed to put her emotional imprint on Charles. There is the concept of "wife goggles", which refers to the fact that a man can still see his aging wife as beautiful, perhaps more so than younger and objectively prettier women than her, if that wife was with him when she was herself young and pretty and gave him the most potents highs in serotonin and oxytocin. You'd expect such an evolved me…
/r/askTRP06/10/17 04:27 PM
1

The women who you think are good at manipulating men go for men who can be manipulated, they approach dating on the defensive, and that simultaneously keeps the alphas away, who see them as too much trouble when there can be easier pickings elsewhere. It all depends how you approach dating, whether you want to "fall in love" (i.e. passively accept the other person an let your human nature flood you with emotions) or want to take charge and steer the other person's emotions. Both genders can do i…
/r/askTRP06/10/17 03:43 PM
6

I think everyone has an intuition, nobody wants to state the obvious. A slightly more generic observation: take any ethnicity, any race, any nationality. The more one sex in that group is seen as desirable, the less desirable the other will be.
/r/MGTOW26/09/17 01:16 AM
6

How about the fact that not divorcing is in the best interests of the child? The "best interests of the child" argument is completely bullshit, because it is used selectively. In some situations, it becomes secondary to "but that's not fair to the parents", while in other, selective ones, it trumps it. That's not an argument, that's rationalizing your preferred state of things.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:08 PM
1

Sure, you can be crazy charismatic, or be so rich that you'll always have arm candy. The question you need to ask yourself is who do you want to be in life? And before you ask that question, realize that you live in a world very different from that of your ancestors, where physical exercise is not a part of normal life, it's something you have to actively pursue. Even men in professions that used to be physically demanding are now mostly operating machinery, and if your job is not physical in na…
/r/askTRP05/08/17 08:19 AM
2

It's important to remember that TRP is not about "plating sluts", it is about succeeding with women. There's a subtle difference there, that isn't talked about enough, gets complete overlooked by newcomers and assumed by veterans. TRP was created by the collected wisdom of guys who, because they didn't know how to succeed with women intuitively had to do so rationally. One of these principles is that, as the gatekeepers of commitment, men's strategy has to be to focus on sex, no matter what they…
/r/askTRP02/08/17 03:09 PM
1

Don't know anything about Southern Baptists. But it's awfully convenient for her to say "everything in the Bible is 100% true" and then proceeding not to follow a single rule set within. If she had read the damn thing, she might have come across 1 Peter 3:1: Wives, in the same way, submit yourselves to your husbands, so that even if they refuse to believe the word, they will be won over without words by the behavior of their wives I think it might have been more a case of "he's Catholic, so he's…
/r/MGTOW28/07/17 03:35 PM
1

she broke up with me was because I "wasn't saved." That's pretty poor biblical theology if you ask me. That's what happens with the more fringe christian sects, a follower of a more mainline tradition should, in theory, have a better understanding of what is proper biblical behavior for women (and men).
/r/MGTOW28/07/17 03:03 PM
1

Actually, nowhere in the bible is Joseph's age mentioned. He was probably older, as in 35, which would have been a common thing at that time. He was first portrayed as old in a book written in the 5th century, and that characterization stuck, probably because it provided an easy explanation to the lifelong virginity of Mary. In that version, he's 90, and dies at 111.
/r/MGTOW28/07/17 02:59 PM
1

Sorry your feelings got hurt, maybe this place isn't for you then. If you wanted to be handled with kids gloves, you should have posted elsewhere.
/r/askTRP28/07/17 02:35 PM
1

Being you and having confidence is what makes you beautiful, not what some beauty magazine portrays as beautiful That's why you feel the need to not only carefully choose your angle, but also digitally retouch the photos. Let's try this with other things in life: Being you and having confidence is what makes you a good person, not what society deems moral (proceeds to lie about past actions social circles would disapprove of) Being you and having confidence is what makes you intelligent, not wha…
/r/MGTOW28/07/17 02:22 PM
1

The dualistic nature of hypergamy seems to necessitate some level of women engaging with multiple partners No, hypergamy just means mate with the highest echelon of the hierarchy, it doesn't mean start small and work your way up. If the only world you know is the tribe, and a woman is mating with the chief, there's nowhere else to go. If the chief is killed or otherwise overtaken by another, the necessity trumps her aversion to discard her current mate, but that doesn't happen often. if pair bon…
/r/askTRP28/07/17 12:16 PM
1

NOT designed [...] and it seems contradictory that any mechanism would penalize [...] The nature of hypergamy dictates You sir don't understand evolution. At all. Evolution simply states that a given environment will provide pressures on what is successful and what isn't. Trying to follow evolution forward is a pointless idea, and there's no design involved. All you can say is this: if you observe some characteristic and you can think of a competing characteristic that could otherwise arise by c…
/r/askTRP28/07/17 03:27 AM
5

The policies don't make any sense, because racial differences are actually higher than gender disparities when it comes to car insurance, it's just against the law to discriminate on that. The reasons women as a group have lower risk is because they drive less, the moment you control for distance driven I believe women's risk is a bit above men. There's only two ways about it: either we take the stance that only directly relevant variables should be used, and every other disparity noticed has a …
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:23 AM
1

There is a very easy solution to this "unpaid domestic work" question: pay her for the domestic work. But also make her pay 50% of all expenses.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:54 PM
1

Hiring a female personal trainer was the first mistake. The second was to renew her after the first occurence of this bullshit. End the sessions you paid for, and go look for another trainer.
/r/askTRP13/07/17 03:33 PM
4

Why the anger? I find these more sad than anything. It's easy to make fun of, until you realize that the only reason you know how not to act like a complete idiot in front of women is because you've been raised on a culture that constantly displays the behaviors of successful and unsuccessful men. Even with feminism's constant wail about women wanting sensitive men, you still get good examples through movies, and especially through your older peers. In a culture where seduction is not necessary …
/r/askTRP07/07/17 02:31 PM
3

Jesus... you're not standing up for yourself, you're giving her drama. Why the hell are you still talking to her? From the start, it should have been "I don't like the idea, but you're free to do what you want". That's it, end it there. You talking about "respecting your feelings" is the most beta thing you could tell her. I don't think there's much to salvage there honestly, she's already made you out to be insecure, now if she goes on that trip you bet she's going to take the opportunity to ri…
/r/askTRP29/06/17 02:31 AM
3

Rejection is not you telling her "I don't like you". Rejection is her wanting your investment and her not getting it. Her imagining you'd continue to date her and you not living up to that wish is rejection. It's very simple: either she rejects you or you reject her. If she flakes, doesn't pick up calls, stops talking to you or makes her reply as short as possible, she's rejecting you. Anything else, it's her accepting you. From that point on, either you stay with her or you reject her, and they…
/r/askTRP27/06/17 02:18 PM
11

Women handle rejection about as well as mediterranean men handle being told their mom is a whore. They take it as a personal insult, and the emotional high sends them on a quest to destroy you. If they have the potential to damage you in any way, avoid being in that situation in the first place (don't shit where you eat), otherwise ignore them.
/r/askTRP27/06/17 01:52 PM
2

I don't understand what advice you are looking for. Do you have a specific question? Do you want some validation for your strategy? Do you want to know when to say yes to sex? You say you're Roman Catholic, 30 and living in the South. You also say you "don't sleep around". Are you a virgin? If yes, you should let him know, and should be stating you will to get married and be a traditional wife. But I'm gonna assume you aren't, and aren't in a hurry to get married. If that's the case, your Cathol…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 08:12 PM
3

May I stay? Bow The dick sucking is fine, but you've gotta stop this faggotty.
/r/askTRP19/06/17 01:36 PM
2

Besides lifting? Get good at your job, and play ruthless politics until you get promoted as high as you can. The ruthless part should make you a monster to contend with. If you do that for a while, you'll internalize the dark triad behaviors, and women will love you for it.
/r/askTRP15/06/17 03:34 AM
3

Thanks. I must say I'm a bit surprised by all these answers saying "you don't need a trainer if you're disciplined" when I clearly stated that this post was for people who have a hard time disciplining themselves. I personally went from following a program drafted by a friend, to have 1 session per week with a trainer + 1-2 sessions by myself, to going by myself again, to 3 times a week with a trainer. The differences in the speed of progress are immense. Not to mention the matter of proper form…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/17 07:17 PM
2

The first programmer was not Ada Lovelace. If writing instructions for a theoretical machine is programming, Charles Babbage was the first programmer, Ada was the second, or if you want, Ada was the "first programmer of a machine one hasn't designed themselves". It's worth noting the types of programs she wrote could today be written by a properly instructed 8 year old. That shouldn't remove from her accomplishment, since she had to figure all that herself, but her programming and modern day sof…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:13 PM
2

Don't confuse motivation and discipline. Motivation is cheap, it's saying "I wish to wake up early". Discipline is the hard part, it's actually waking up when the alarm buzzes, the bed is warm and the outside air is cold. In my experience, the type of person I described has no problem getting motivated, but has a really hard time getting disciplined, and the accountability part, the external pressure is necessary. I'm not saying a trainer is essential. What I'm saying is if you have a hard time …
/r/TheRedPill03/06/17 12:30 AM
7

I appreciate that you can get the same information for free, the same is true for a lot of human knowledge, and we should count ourselves fortunate that we have access to it. But it can also become overwhelming, and the whole reason for money is to trade your competence and effort for convenience in a domain you are not particularly good at producing what you desire. I believe that for the type of personality I've outlined, this is a place where their money would be well spent. You probably are …
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 09:32 PM
1

I make this exact point in the second to last paragraph.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 08:42 PM
3

You are required to disclose because condoms do not perfectly protect you against STDs. That's why if you don't disclose, use condoms, and the partner gets HIV anyway, they can claim the risk of sex with you was misrepresented. That being said, if it can be demonstrated that a woman poked holes in the condom, I would like the logic to be that you took appropriate precautions and she purposefully engaged in reckless behavior (the law only requires you to disclose HIV status afaik, not other STDs,…
/r/MGTOW02/06/17 03:42 PM
4

His daughter is pregnant, probably married, so I doubt he worries about that too much.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 12:21 PM
10

It's mainly a Jewish and Muslim practice, not a Christian one. The only reason it's so prevalent in the US is that some doctor at some point recommended it to curb masturbation. But I don't see the relevance. FGM is likewise a religious practice, only performed by a fraction of muslims. Does mutilation become ok because it's a mainstream religious practice?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:42 PM
1

I agree with you, I understand all three sides and don't think there should be a conflict. But there is because the philosophy is different. And the philosophy is different, mainly I think, because of differences in temperament. Those are often very hard to reconcile.
/r/askTRP29/05/17 12:29 AM
2

Imagine a friend invite you to play a game. Halfway through the game, you, and a bunch of other people participating realize the game is ridiculously stacked in the favor of that friend who invited you, and the rules are not what they appear. Others say that no, the game rules are fine, you're crazy for thinking that. Now obviously, you can divide the world into those who like (or say they like) the rules, and those who don't. But those who don't may disagree about what to do about it. Some will…
/r/askTRP28/05/17 06:44 PM
2

Well, if she makes up her mind one way or the other, she's making the decision for him. Him not being careful is obviously on him, and it's on him to decide if he wants to be responsible or not. It factors into it in about the same way the difference between a woman not taking birth control and her birth control failing would factor into the morality of the abortion. Now like you said, you won't find yourself in this situation. Neither would I. So we don't need to worry about using this tactic. …
/r/askTRP26/05/17 10:17 PM
2

Becoming a parent is a huge decision too. I can't think of a scenario where manipulating someone into going into porn or enlist in the army would be the only way I could carry out a huge decision instead of it's outcome being imposed on me, so the morality of it is moot, since I won't ever be in a position to do that. For the abortion case, the woman is essentially coercing you into fatherhood, so I don't feel like manipulating her into an abortion is a disproportionate response.
/r/askTRP26/05/17 09:56 PM
5

Having an abortion can be an emotionally shattering experience. Can be, can not be. People fought long and hard for it to be legal, then for "easy and safe access", then for a doctors to not be allowed to try to sway you and for society to celebrate it. Guess what, they've convinced me abortion is just not that big a deal. People can be manipulated into all sorts of things that can be emotionally shattering. Fatherhood for example. Or military service. Or porn acting. None of that is illegal, at…
/r/askTRP26/05/17 09:25 PM
7

When faced with a game where the rules are unfairly stacked against you, you have three choices: try to change the rules of the game decide not to play the game learn to exploit those rules and play the game better This sub does the first, MGTOW do the second and TRP does the third. There would obviously be disagreements, but it's obvious the three strategies are not completely mutually exclusive, and in all three cases, the parties can agree the rules are shit.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:29 AM
1

Men and women have the same average IQ because IQ has been designed to give you an average of 100 for both sexes. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient#Sex. And if you look at the difference in scores he's showing, they're tiny. He claims they are statistically significant, given the sample size. I don't know about that. I haven't done the math, so someone can correct me, but we're talking about 1/15th of the standard deviation, with a sample size under 20,000. And that's just …
/r/MGTOW05/05/17 02:19 AM
2

I think it's more that the past religious stance against prostitution is exploited to keep it illegal. But it's just convenience, if progressives wanted prostitution legalized, they'd find their way around religious opposition, and if it's the religious people who decided they wanted it legalized, they would make no progress on it without the progressives being on board. My point is that while in the past prostitution was made illegal through a religious mandate, religion has very little influen…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 01:53 PM
15

A bit, but not nearly as much as you think. In counties where you not only can marry a person of the same sex, but be fined for refusing to bake a cake for that person, where you can not only get an abortion, but get punched in the face for saying it's murder, do you really think there is that much religious influence over the politics of prostitution? No, prostitution is illegal there to "protect the women" and something something sex trafficking. It's illegal because the secular feminist autho…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 12:37 PM
2

When sex is taken out of the human equation.
/r/askTRP23/04/17 06:34 PM
8

Exactly. Because marriage brought in stability, you had sex and progeny figured out if you were a man, and you knew what you were working for. Now marriage brings in instability, additional expenses and stress, especially that the woman leaves you if you're not doing exactly what she wants.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 06:17 PM
1

The only part you could possibly have done better is instead of saying "Is this a decision or are you trying to have a relationship talk?" was to just end it right there. If she even lets the idea of you breaking up escape her lips, it's over. But you're young, so don't worry about it, you aced it for all intents and purposes.
/r/askTRP05/04/17 11:44 PM
1

If a young woman goes to the doctor and asks for an abortion, and the doctor suggests alternatives and to think through this important life decision, the doctor is an evil patriarch who doesn't understand the limits of his profession and should be sued. But a young woman goes to the doctor and asks for sterilization, and the doctor does not suggest alternatives and to think through this important life decision, the doctor is an evil patriarch who doesn't understand the limits of his profession a…
/r/MGTOW05/04/17 10:27 PM
2

You should watch the first video on the page, it's hilarious. It's entitled "Manage your money and avoid divorce", and you'd think from that title it was a message addressed to men, or at the very least, both genders. Instead, it's really only advice for women, as illustrated by the first point, "keep working". The example they give is a multi billionaire founder of a cosmetic company (a perfect representative of the average person) who looks at least fifty and build "a decade-long marriage". Th…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:16 PM
1

We have no business engineering society. Very different from letting the social structure evolve by itself, and writing laws that offer guarantees against some element's disruptive behavior, so they can go on about their business with more confidence. But if you disagree with that, I say why stop at the female ratio? Why not enforce a quota for race? Then a quota for hair color. Eye color. Height. Weight. Personality type, like extroverts vs introverts? I thought we all agreed that discriminatin…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:36 PM
1

I read it, and I'm not convinced. You assume this is an issue that needs addressing, I completely reject that assumption. Could someone who doesn't fit the stereotypes of a certain field be looked at as an outsider? Yes, it could, but guess what, life is not always fair, and you have no business trying to fix that with any sort of artificial social engineering. Let people be people, let them do what they want. And those those upset about it, I say grow a pair, because if these minor hurdles hurt…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 03:52 PM
3

The point of these quotas is to make people feel like they can actually do anything they want, or that these fields don't actively hinder or outright stop somebody from following their passions If you need to see someone exactly like you (on a superficial level, mind you, not on the level of personality) doing what you like to do in order to pursue your passions, I'd wager you weren't very passionate to start with.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:42 PM
3

There is no such thing as an "uncircumcised" penis. There's only normal penises, deformed penises and circumcised penises. Would you care about what she had to say if she were fat and ugly? "Listen not to what a woman says but watch how she acts" or so goes the rule. If you have high SMV, she'll suck a completely deformed dick, but if you trim your junk according to her specifications, you can be sure she's never going to go near you.
/r/askTRP27/03/17 12:14 PM
2

I know, didn't want to imply that, just to illustrate how the SJW editors on Wikipedia can spin the Hijra in a progressive fashion. But I think there's a larger lesson here. There's always been all sorts of abnormal sexual impulses, and always people on the losing side of reproductive success. Different cultures dealt with them differently. The antique Greeks for example had pederasty, which was a narrow "window of opportunity" for pedophilia/homosexuality. Indians have the Hijra, which looks pr…
/r/MGTOW03/03/17 04:58 PM
3

Here's a better version I always thought women who are in friends-with-benefits situations must be the most secure and feminine women ever. They can watch their partner going on expensive dates with someone else and not even give a fuck. Being "just someone he's saying at this moment" is the epitome of womanhood.
/r/MGTOW03/03/17 03:59 PM
29

If the West is convinced the future is female, its future is Islamic.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:52 PM
1

The article is hilarious. These identities have no exact match in the modern Western taxonomy of gender and sexual orientation, and challenge Western ideas of sex and gender. Oh yeah, such challenge, much different, this has never happened in the West. In India, some Hijras do not define themselves by specific sexual orientation, but rather by renouncing sexuality altogether. Sexual energy is transformed into sacred powers. So, exactly like celibate priests? However, these notions can come in co…
/r/MGTOW03/03/17 03:48 PM
14

Come on, have we not learned that logic and facts do not work with these people? The only hope is to beat them at their own game: ask for a private session, then say you can't even do that because it triggers you. If they say they think you're being disingenuous, threaten to slap them with a Title IX complaint. But really, I'd say at this point, the onus is on the prospective student to research their future university for signs of late stage feminism. Sure, they all love social justice, but som…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/17 05:32 AM
1

I just understand that from TRP, being attractive and good in bed is what keeps a man. Leave it at "being attractive and good". There are two things here, the first is the bait, the second is the hook. You need to be attractive to catch a man's interest, just like you need to be confident to attract a woman's. But that's not what will make a person stay with another, nor is it being good in bed. We stay out of a feeling of security. Women's need for material and social security should be pretty …
/r/askTRP02/03/17 05:18 AM
4

It's both. He's relatively young and handsome, especially for a head of state. Now if she were to actually be around him for a while, his personality would make her lose those tingles pretty quickly.
/r/MGTOW16/02/17 01:58 PM
1

Women do that all the time. Don't be a moron, find a way to stay on perfectly friendly terms with them will forcing the responsibility of their laziness back onto them. It might be harder if other thirsty men help her, but then that's not your problem, is it?
/r/MGTOW16/02/17 01:50 PM
7

She was trying to choose, and still on the fence It is very important for you to understand the following: this choice does not exist. Not in this form. A woman may choose between two pretenders, two guys who are courting her. She may even nowadays sometimes be able to choose between two guys she is sleeping with. But she cannot choose between her husband and a lover, by even formulating this as a choice she presents herself as a whore. She is basically saying that her word means nothing, and th…
/r/askTRP22/01/17 06:43 AM
7

My single sentence couldn't carry much information nor subtlety, so allow me to elaborate. Rural India has a "rape problem" (if you want to term in this way), urban India does not. Urban India is one of the most misandrist places on Earth. One of the reasons for it being so is that politicians are trying to overcompensate for what is going on in rural India, but that's akin to punching your friend because this other guy at the bar is being a dick. But rural India has a multitude of other problem…
/r/MensRights17/01/17 04:52 PM
46

Of course it is, since it includes sleeping with a woman and then not marrying her, as well as lying about your income/caste.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 03:34 AM
1

Traditional etiquette is that the guy pays because traditional etiquette mandates that the guy make the first move, anything else is rationalization to hide that fact. Traditionally also, women made less money than men, if at all, so once that is invalidated, everything else falls apart.
/r/askTRP16/01/17 03:48 PM
3

Funnily enough, the toilet on a ship is at the opposite side of the poop deck. That's why it's called "head".
/r/TheRedPill10/01/17 10:25 PM
3

"Head" is actual a naval term for the toilet on a vessel, it's not strictly military.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/17 10:22 PM
18

She should for moral reasons, but practically speaking, it's a good idea to leave her out. If she were named in the suit, the media and feminist activists would have the perfect story to sway public opinion, and even pressure the judge to throw out: "young rapist sues victim because he's just that evil". That is a story they would love to publish and be motivated to talk about. But "rapist sues school" just doesn't have the same ring to it. Some feminist academics might come to the rescue of the…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 03:40 PM
1

Europe was also ethnic groups fighting each other for a long time. Different environments, different evolutionary pressures, different outcomes. It's very easy and simplistic to say "niggers", just as it is simplistic and easy to say "evil white men". You can add a lot of 'ifs' to the equation, "if there was no colonization", "if they cooperated instead of fighting", "if the climate was colder and necessity forced them to innovate". Truth is, we have no way of know what could have happened, we c…
/r/MGTOW30/12/16 04:28 PM
17

They really need to complain more. No, they do not, because it won't do any good. You are thinking from the perspective of a woman. When women complain, people take pity, they listen and things get fixed. Or should I say, men fix things. That's what civilizations are built upon: women complaining about something and men falling over themselves to try to fix it. Nobody cares about a man complaining, it never happened and it will never happen. But men have other ways to affect change: they can dec…
/r/MensRights30/12/16 02:09 PM
3

It's not about resources, it's about economic value. And economic value comes from large, active economies, i.e. societies whose members have pursued an important level of specialization an are exchanging with one another as a result. So the picture of colonials coming to Africa to steal the resources is only half of the picture, the other half is that the native tribes were not exploiting those resources prior to the colonials powers arriving. It's not obvious when those societies (if ever) wou…
/r/MGTOW30/12/16 01:52 PM
19

While not all patriarchal societies progressed into successful civilizations, all successful civilizations have been patriarchal. A nuclear patriarchal family unit is a necessary but not sufficient condition for continued human development.
/r/MGTOW30/12/16 01:29 PM
13

Oh noes! The poor oppressed women! What does that have to do with anything? Women were programmers too, back when programs were 10 lines long and most of the work involving punching holes in the cards. And guess what, they didn't stay when the software got more complex.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:48 PM
2

A girl having sex at 11 is not normal, and would likely be caused by some prior abuse. But neither is 12 or 13, and the cases I know anecdotally were pretty obvious cases of issues at home. The 18 year old in this story likely has huge daddy issues. Where do you draw the line? Calling them sluts doesn't negate how they got there, it's a statement of fact. I'm of the belief that a lot less child abuse would happen if fathers had a spine and a healthy trust relationship with their daughters. That …
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 03:51 PM
7

not a manifestation of having started having sex before middle school. You're projecting the most absurd levels of cynicism What kind of planet do you live on? Quite a few girls do start having sex at 12. Not the majority, but neither is the majority of 18 year olds having threesomes. You really believe that the average, mentally stable girl keeps her legs closed until the age of majority then goes for a pork roast? That's not reality, that's fantasy from a women's studies textbook.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 05:03 AM
12

Seems to be a matter of theory versus practice. Islam has the potential to turn extremely blue pill if it goes through a reform. Look what happened with Christianity, feminists were able to get it to a state where they convinced everyone that the headship of the husband means the husband must make the wife happy at all times and is responsible for everything she does wrong. As it is practiced now, Islam is still brutal to women, but I can see a reformed version getting even more cucked than Chri…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 04:47 PM
5

Nothing wrong with a guy waiting until his late thirties to have a kid. For women, waiting this long has serious health consequences, both for the mother and the child. That's not even talking about the much lower fertility at that age that often prevents these women from getting pregnant in the first place. If you're a woman and want a kid, the earlier the better, and 35, especially for your first child, is pretty much last call. That's sound medical advice pretty much any gynecologist will giv…
/r/PussyPass10/12/16 07:49 PM
2

She doesn't remember the guy objectively. Never claimed she did. By "better", I obviously mean better by her metrics and her perception, not yours. And you're right that has more to do with the SMV gap than anything. But you can beat the high school guy if you are at the top of your game. If you aren't, and her expectations are unrealistic, why does it matter if she got them through alpha widowhood or being treated like a princess?
/r/askTRP23/11/16 12:32 AM
2

Bingo. Who cares about the specific circumstances of a particular girl, just observe her behavior. Either she devotes herself to you or she doesn't, at which point you just extract as much sex as you want them fuck off. The other thing to remember is that alpha widowhood is not a once-in-a-lifetime deal. It's just a symptom of her comparing this one guy to all the others she's had since and realistically can hope to have going forward. If you are better than that guy, done, she'll now be yours a…
/r/askTRP23/11/16 12:06 AM
1

And when you're done doing the work, you get decades of attractiveness. Women start depreciating at 25 and there's nothing they can do about it. Life ain't fair, but there is a balance. Tough out your cons and enjoy your pros.
/r/askTRP15/11/16 06:59 AM
10

The mother displayed bitterness, but I wouldn't call it disrespect. Like others have said, saying something like "couldn't vote for a criminal" and move on. As for the sister, you should have laughed in her face. If you didn't, just do not take anything she says seriously anymore, treat her like a child who is cute but ultimately has no clue about the realm of adults. If she tries to stir up shit, get out of the situation. If this requires you to distance yourself from her family, or even demote…
/r/askTRP10/11/16 07:16 AM
1

Uh, zero? They don't spend it on the child, they put the money in their bank account, so it becomes their money. Separately, as a parent, they spend some of their own money on the child. It's funny, when you go on a business trip, you company pays for your stuff, but it doesn't just deposit a couple hundreds in your bank account. No, it makes you submit an expense report, with reasonable limits on various categories. Now you tell me what's unfair about that latter arrangement, and I'll believe c…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/16 02:02 AM
2

So you admit that it's for the mom's lifestyle, and has nothing to do with the rights of the child. If you can't afford to raise a kid, you should give custody to the parent that can. And yes, I'm speaking purely from principles, I know that's not how the law works currently.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/16 06:10 PM
15

And I cringe when I see someone defend it as "the right of the child". Who is getting the money? Not the child, the mother (or the custodial parent of you want to include your very rare case). And there is no legal requirement to spend that money on the child, so how does it have anything to do with "the rights of the child"?
/r/TheRedPill29/10/16 12:16 PM
6

It does to some extent. TRP often talks about the Muslim immigration crisis going on, how feminism seem to like Islam despite, and a little bit ironically because, it is very aggressive, masculine and traditional. We talk about how a large scale demographic shift could steer the culture towards the red pill, not taking shit from a woman being a staple of Muslim values. Now let's be honest: Jewish culture and values are pretty much exact opposite. It priorities learning and intellect over force, …
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 05:39 PM
18

Jews make what, less than 2% of the population? They are more than 30% in media and other positions of power. There's absolutely a very large number of them who got there through skill, and the higher IQ average among Jewish people is well documented. But saying there is no nepotism is ludicrous. Preferential treatment to your own kind is encoded in the Talmud, and it becomes very quickly apparent that this is in fact a very standard cultural trait. And that's ok, everyone does it, to some degre…
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 05:25 PM
28

No true Scotsman. I don't think anyone is saying Soros is an evil conniving motherfucker because he's Jewish, but he definitely is a evil conniving Jew.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 05:15 PM
6

I'm not seeing much kindness towards the men who need to pay child support, why should there be some for women?
/r/PussyPass06/10/16 06:02 PM
5

When men have trouble paying for child support, that's the answer they are given. They're expected to find a way to earn the money, or to not have gotten themselves in that situation in the first place. I now expect the same of women, "because it's 2016".
/r/PussyPass06/10/16 05:58 PM
1

System like these have already been tried, it leads to shortages of these goods and creates a black market for them, where they become 100 times not expensive. It's not a good idea.
/r/PussyPass06/10/16 01:48 PM
9

If you can't support yourself, you have no business having kids. "Keep it in your pants" and all that jazz.
/r/PussyPass06/10/16 04:07 AM
3

How? Because she's a woman, and it's a woman's prerogative to act as she feels, without burdens like logic and consistency. I suggest you make peace with that.
/r/askTRP05/10/16 02:20 PM
3

Women are way more concerned about emotional infidelity, whereas men care about the sexual part. If you're a good catch, your LTR will not leave you even if you cheated on her. Going to her crying about how you're sorry will prove that you aren't such a good catch. Now, there's a few things to say about the whole situation. First, why did you sleep with that other chick, if your LTR is so much better? You said you "kinda fucked" in the past, so there was nothing to be curious about. If it's just…
/r/askTRP02/10/16 12:17 AM
3

It's a matter of degrees, the hotter the chick, the higher the number, with which come the side affects of alpha-widowhood, entitlement and of course STDs. Low count girls exist, but they're typically less attractive. Then there's a sort of inversion and the really ugly and fat ones are even sluttier than the hot ones (because putting out is literally the only thing they have going for them), but we don't talk about those. Ultimately, each man has his own tolerance on the hot-crazy-slutty scale.…
/r/MGTOW18/09/16 11:07 PM
3

Like everyone else said, no, you don't talk to her about here past. Take a step back and think about what you'd be trying to accomplish with this talk, and what you're likely to accomplish. It's not like she can change her past at this point, and it looks like there's not much she could do in the behavior department to compensate. As for whether to continue the relationship, I'll say something that the majority may not like, but I've found to be practical: take a page from the woman's handbook. …
/r/askTRP26/08/16 05:59 PM
2

I wonder how much that is a factor of people just being nicer when interacting with women in general (attractiveness, neoteny), so they'd enjoy it more, and how much of it is tied to their evolutionarily developed social acuity. It doesn't really matter at the end of the day, it's undeniable that women are more desirable in positions heavy on human contact.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 03:52 PM
13

Women are preferred in cashier and other visible positions because they entice customers to come. That's a well known fact. I'm pretty sure the employees that work back of house are mostly male.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 02:36 PM
3

People keep using that word, "mistake"... (insert Inigo Montoya meme). There is no such thing as cheating "by mistake". It's a deliberate move, either without care for your feelings (acting on tingles) or to purposefully wound them (revenge fuck). What's a mistake cheating look like? She got drunk and went home with a guy, but wasn't in the right state of mind? What the hell was she doing getting drunk in a bar in the first place, other than hoping for that exact thing to happen? Do not let wome…
/r/askTRP20/08/16 06:25 PM
2

We're saying different things. You suggest delusion, I would suggest taking the reins and yes, apply nuclear levels of dread. Basically fill out divorce papers and be ready to sign them at the next sign of slip up. And finally have your eyes open and realize that you were the backup plan, and make the appropriate changes to stop being a chump. Do all that while protecting yourself financially in case that divorce does go through. And there is a logical basis to stay: the kids. There's a chance t…
/r/askTRP16/08/16 07:46 PM
2

I strongly disagree. OP can't just erase the knowledge he's acquired, and if he can't respect himself, his wife won't. A dead bedroom, and end to cooperation beyond the necessary, where is the "quality" in that marriage? You seem to think the quality and the existence of the marriage are one and the same, they simply are not. There are ways to keep the marriage going and save its quality, but they don't involve anything that could come out of a counselor's mouth.
/r/askTRP16/08/16 06:05 PM
5

She claims she was so desperate for friends at the time, she basically did it to keep him around, not because she really wanted it. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHA! That's fucking LIE. She whored it up because she WANTED to. Women have sex for two general reasons: to gain something they want but can't get (easily) otherwise, and to satisfy the tingles a particular guy is given them at that time. So OP, ask yourself, is "friendship" something she realistically could not have gotten in any ot…
/r/askTRP16/08/16 03:21 PM
3

I don't know what definition of "quality" you have in mind, but it certainly doesn't sound like getting the guy to toss his dignity out the window would improve the quality of the marriage. I agree it's not personal, and I agree their only goal is to avoid the divorce. But the rest is optional, and the advice works for women only. And in practice, you can bet the counsellor will heavily side with the woman 9 times out of 10.
/r/askTRP16/08/16 02:15 PM
2

Whenever a question like this pops up, I find it useful to think about the gender-flipped dual. A girl accepting gifts from orbiters would translate to a guy taking advantage of a girl throwing herself at him. Would you tell your buddy to be a gentleman and refuse the sex, because he knows the girl wants more? Of course not! But at the same time, you would not encourage him to lead her on, and allow her to believe she is getting to her goal. You do that because, while you acknowledge the other p…
/r/askTRP20/07/16 04:32 AM
4

Seriously. Everyone acts as if it's impossible to kick a girl out. Here's your shit, here's bus fare back to your mom, have a good life.
/r/askTRP27/06/16 01:27 PM
3

But much better advice too. It's an appealing notion, but the fact of the matter is, you don't want to have sex with your best friend, at the very least if you are a woman. That's why the concept of the friendzone exists, and it is generally accepted that friendship seldom leads to romance. But I guess if the scope of the advice is to treat the partner in a way that is not exploitative, and make sure not to be exploited yourself, it isn't that bad.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:48 AM
16

she isn't a special snowflake Click play on the video, and close your eyes. What do you hear? To me she sounds like the plainest, most stereotypical basic bitch you imagination can muster. Older female actresses usually were pretty hot in their day, but had something original about them, something that allowed them to be useful as something more than eye candy. Megan Fox is unfortunately not one of them, and she must be aware of that fact on some level. I predict that in a few years, she'll be o…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 04:10 PM
3

Yeah, if you take the college-educated, middle or upper-middle class marring at her epiphany phase, then it's about 35%. That is still too much risk for entering an agreement that has very little benefit, and where someone else can make a decision that will fuck you up for life. Think about it, would you sign a paper that gives your house to your best friend in case your friendship ends? Then think about the odds of your close friends betraying you, and how those compare to a woman doing the sam…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 04:41 PM
3

Yes, prevention is the best medicine, and not getting married is objectively the best step one can take to not only avoid getting fucked by such a system, but in reducing, or at the very least not feeding it. But it's not enough, you may not be able to avoid family court if you have children. So is the solution to also not have kids? I'm sure that works for a lot of guys here, but quite a few probably want to have a legacy. Should they sacrifice that goal to avoid the possibility of a judge dest…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 04:32 PM
4

Which marriage is that? I don't think TRP has said much about traditional marriage, the one where divorce is not a thing and married men are given societal respect, simply because it's not really a possibility for the vast majority of readers. Let's not forget that the current institution called marriage shares only the name and white gown with traditional marriage as our grandparents knew it, but nothing else. So if you want to make the argument that TRP is "wrong about marriage", you need to s…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/16 02:13 PM
9

Very true. It’s a subtle change, and we've gone from an ownership model to a lease model in so many facets of our lives that we don’t even realize the impact. Home ownership is too expensive, everyone rents. Entertainment and media is no longer physical, and everyone is pushing towards the licensing model. Relationships are basically the "leased version” of marriage, and parents (especially fathers) don’t feel like they can have a say in how to raise their own kids. And of course, the migrations…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 07:57 PM
23

Everyone seems to think that the question of Swedish men "stepping up" to save their country is a matter of intent, that they "don't want to" but "should want to". I propose that in the majority of case, it's instead of question of ability. If the majority of them has been raised and told all their life to be sensitive, caring, "respectful towards women", the masculinity is toxic and violent, an that is a "bad thing", how many do you think would know how to save their country, if they wanted to?…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 02:41 PM
9

They can't convert anyone except illiterate impoverished middle-easterners Not entirely true, there are quite a few westerners who converted, I believe it's the religion that sees the most people converting into it. It's not large scale yet, but the other thing to take into account is that vast migrations like this one actually do impoverish an weaken the host country. If you are a young man living in France, for example, your job prospects are actually pretty bad (not entirely the cause of larg…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 02:28 PM
7

For those interested, Stefan's question starts at 44:24, her answer starts at 45:54.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 02:18 PM
20

Hard to tell them apart. Please. Capitalism worked pretty well in conjunction with a single earner household, when the floor of unskilled labor was at a level sufficient to raise and feed a family. It shouldn't be a surprise that suddenly doubling the supply of labor drives wages down.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 02:52 PM
1

Differences in race would be the result of different evolutionary selection processes in different areas of the world. Which we know to be true. On top of that, the cultures exerted their own selection pressures, which in turn fed back to select traits in those cultures. But I agree that it doesn't really serve much purpose in TRP, so there's no point in dwelling on it.
/r/askTRP01/05/16 09:34 PM
0

I'm so sorry that hearing someone saying Canada doesn't have the most luxurious hospitals in the world triggered you so much.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:37 AM
1

Yes, I have. Only in one province though, so I guess I can't generalize the country as a whole, but I think it's a reasonable assumption that it wouldn't be vastly different. There's absolutely not bad. Read again, I said I like the Canadian model, but I can't in all honesty say that US hospitals aren't luxurious in comparison. Do you need that kind of luxury? Probably not, it still does the job, the equipment is in fairly good order and your diseases are treated just as well. But you can't deny…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:35 AM
1

Have you been to both a Canadian and an American hospital? You can disagree with his conclusion, I certainly think nationalized healthcare is a good thing, but I didn't find anything he said to be incorrect. US hospitals are amazingly modern, clean, professional, I've only had good experiences there. The problem is that kind of service will bankrupt you if you don't have a well-paying job that gives you a good health insurance plan. That's the debate, I don't think anyone can honestly state that…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:51 PM
9

Not one of. The biggest, it's a fitness test on a societal level, exerted at the point when western civilization yielded so much comfort, that men as a whole were at their weakest. It was bound to happen.
/r/MGTOW19/04/16 05:33 AM
1

Just trolling for the sake of it? What's the point? You could have talked about chronic fatherlessness in the black community, how this leads to early sexualization and its glorification. You could have made some valid points. But no, just trolling.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 02:56 AM
1

The same way you stop a man staring at tits.
/r/askTRP01/04/16 03:13 PM
11

Look... we get it, you have a fetish and are proud of it. Good for you, you found something you can enjoy. And if your wife enjoys you fucking other girls in front of her, that's cool too. But don't embarrass yourself pretending this is some superior lifestyle, something that gives you "insight" into what women find attractive. We've heard it from the guys who go to anti-rape protests in miniskirts and high heels. Cuckolding is a paraphilia. It's not the mainstream, most women are repulsed by su…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 05:34 AM
7

I'm actually not sure what to think of this guy. Going back a few pages, he posted this comment: Interestingly enough, the best advice I could give to any bull would be to spend some time in /r/TheRedPill So he's a sub, he understands alpha and beta, he know he's the beta in the equation. So why is he giving advice on being alpha? I'm no psychologist, but that feels like self-resentment and cognitive dissonance between his lifestyle and his reading and understanding TRP.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 04:26 PM
2

Then I encourage you to do just that: disregard everything she says about "waiting until marriage", act as if there's some kind of blockage in your brain that prevents it from processing those words, and keep charming her and trying to get into her pants. Then, one of two things can happen: either she makes a second "mistake" and sleeps with you, just like she did with her ex, or you aren't hot enough and she breaks up with you because "you didn't respect her boundaries" or some shit. That is th…
/r/askTRP21/03/16 04:35 PM
1

Don't try to negotiate with her, it doesn't work. First, she cannot "wait until marriage" because she's not a virgin. You can try to tell her that, but all she'll do is rationalize it away. Second, does she even want to get married (i.e. would gladly get tied for life to you in an isolated chapel with one witness because she feels this strongly about you) or does she want a wedding (distant, well-planned and expensive party where she can be the center of attention)? If you are considering marria…
/r/askTRP21/03/16 03:50 PM
2

Like u/LegenraryPeace said, when he argues that there are no male role models for kids growing up, he's not saying there's a conspiracy that keeps men out, he's just stating a fact. Why are there no male teachers? Many factors, the top one being that because women are by nature better with kids/want to work with kids, they have flooded the profession, feminized it beyond recognition and made it simultaneously unappealing and dangerous for men. Imagine trying to get some kind of word out as a mal…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 01:01 AM
2

Remember that feminism is about maximally restricting male behavior while removing all restrictions from female behavior. This confounding of concepts to further that goal is nothing new: we've already accepted that sexist jokes are sexual assault. The only thing these two concept have in common are the three letter "s", "e", "x", yet it is now policy in most organization that saying "women are bad drivers" is just like forcing ourselves onto them. So why not say that all-male clubs cause rape? …
/r/MensRights11/03/16 04:28 PM
16

That's what marriage was for: it protected the weaker party from the whims of the stronger.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 07:43 PM
1

not when you inherit it. Do you seriously think it matters to the chicks he's fucking?
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 03:58 AM
5

There's more than 20% difference between the numbers. Are you telling me there are 20% more women in Canada than men?
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:18 PM
2

That would be a rare occurrence, the only circumstances I can think of is that she has some guy she wants to string along for BB and so she can't be known to be in a relationship. But she wouldn't say the words unless you were giving her hints that you want to be in a relationship. Men shouldn't be the first to offer commitment, just like women shouldn't be the first to offer sex.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 04:22 PM
2

Why do shit tests happen? Because the girl isn't certain in your genuine alpha quality. So we're really talking about the same thing, if she comes up with "I'm not ready for a relationship", better up the game immediately because it's a sign you already fucked up somewhere.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 04:18 PM
2

I'm not saying men should say it, I'm just remarking that some do, and the reasons why they do it. I can see it being useful if you accidentally stuck your dick in crazy, and you're afraid she's going to fuck your shit up if you don't let her go easy. It's not like the magical word girlfriend would stop you from spinning plates. No, but the magic of the word is in its status with their friends. She can then call you a cheater and do you harm, and her social circle will back her up.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 04:17 PM
1

But that's not what the tip said. It said "believe them". My point is that if a girl tells you this, it does not mean she is sorting out her emotions and needs time, it means she wants you to fuck off. I never said pursuing such a person is a good idea, it's obviously too late by the time she said this.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 04:12 PM
4

We don't know how bad it really is. Men and women have different emotional reaction to sex in different circumstances, so I don't think men can truly relate to the types of rape you mention. But it is this ignorance that allowed women to change the definition of rape and portray it as the worst crime possible. I don't know what should and shouldn't be legal, and what the exact penalties should be. All I know is that we've created a system where a man demanding sex from his wife is rape, but a wo…
/r/askTRP16/02/16 04:14 PM
1

Of course, in-company, I imagine the standard San Franciscan environment of very "social justice conscious" employees, and a total inability to say anything outside the party line.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 12:36 AM
2

Everybody is free to adhere or not to the community guidelines, but you can't deny there's a strong pressure to do so, and there are avenues for people to complain to github that account XYZ is being discriminatory, unwelcoming and so forth. The reality is that your average github user wouldn't have cared one way or the other. But your average github user is also trying to be a good person and can be very easily swayed into thinking he's not doing enough for "women and minorities", and that may …
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:21 AM
28

And it could also reflect the inherent bias of the repository maintainers, who have been told "we need more women coders" and to be "inclusive and welcoming to women", so they're more likely to take in lesser-quality code if it comes from a woman. The only platform they measured is Github, which recently mandated a code of conduct, where not hurting someone's feelings was more important than honest criticism and code quality.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:23 PM
53

Watch the origin video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYOORimbpUs It's funny, because her observations are mostly correct, so she proves she's not just mindlessly following the leftist dogma. She's right that the migrants do this because they feel the men are weak and won't really respond. She's right that this little miniskirt demonstration is going to actually make things worse, because it confirms exactly what these migrants felt. And she's right that all this is due to feminist goals being…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:02 PM
1

I love this "bad leaders spoiled communism" rhetoric, I know it's easily explained by how ideological our education systems are, but still. Lenin most likely had great intentions, but he was still very much a totalitarian.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:11 AM
1

What I recommend? Read and lurk more, it's obvious you haven't really understood what TRP is about. She assures me she didn't sleep with anyone while we were apart This should never be necessary. The only time a girl should be telling you she hasn't slept with anybody is when you're nexting her because you know she has, and she still thinks lying will get her somewhere. In every other circumstance, it's a proof of your neediness. Before I met my girlfriend he slept with her a few times even You …
/r/askTRP18/01/16 04:47 PM
2

Are you kidding me? Apple is one of the most hardcore "diversity at all cost" tech company out there. They were one of the loud voices stirring the shit about "not enough women in tech", and make no effort to hide they are discriminating in their hiring process to get more "women and minorities". This story just exposes how these policies were only about PR, a case of "good for thee but not for me". If you are looking for an example of a company hiring based solely on merit, Apple isn't it.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:17 PM
4

You don't "make things work with your girlfriend". You become an interesting man who women want to follow, and you call "girlfriend" the ones who do and you have an interest in investing your resources in. Now you said you told her to go, so why are you asking people how to handle it? You shouldn't have made any promise of faithfulness, and you certainly should not have told her what to do. It was her decision, and you only needed her to know you don't do LDR.
/r/askTRP17/01/16 10:02 AM
8

Except they don't realize they're already wasting men's time and money. Men plan and pay for dates, buy drinks for girls at the bar. The average dude sinks quite a bit of money and effort before even seeing the beginning of a reward. Modern women fail to understand what their grandmothers knew: you can't ask for commitment after you've given him what he wants, and when pussy is traded for cheap, it devaluates for everyone.
/r/MGTOW07/01/16 05:55 AM
4

I'm a 20 year old guy. Welcome to life, you have about a decade or two to get your shit in order. Ever since I was young, I remember lying. Sounds like your parents didn't give you the lecture about lying, and you haven't faced the consequences early enough. TRP can't help you with that specifically, you have to figure this one out on your own. I got really into cuckold porn especially when they insulted and made fun of the guy. Cut that shit right now if you haven't done so already. The more yo…
/r/askTRP05/01/16 01:50 AM
2

I was like you once. Tried very hard to make everyone happy. My family didn't like my first girlfriend, and I desperately tried to placate both sides. It ended, as you'd expect, rather poorly. With the next one, make sure sure you maintain your frame from the very beginning. Take advantage of the honeymoon period to establish a respectful attitude in her, reward respect with positive emotions and punish disrespect by withdrawing those emotions. If you do this well, not only will she be the happi…
/r/askTRP14/12/15 11:46 PM
2

Then stoically tell her that. It's hard to make such a change, that's why I've recommended a more subtle approach than others. Sit her down, tell her and leave the choice to change or to walk away to her. And learn from this experience to never allow this kind of disrespect again, from her or the next girl. The idiom to "nip in the bud" is very appropriate here.
/r/askTRP14/12/15 10:27 PM
2

What you describe are some of the reasons why dating across social classes only works one way. Women look for men of a higher status than themselves, so if she's been a posh rich girl all her life, it will naturally bother her that you do not project this kind of status. I'm assuming you must have a pretty well-paying job, otherwise she'd probably comment on your lack of ambition too. What's the solution? I don't know, you've already given her the upper hand if you "love her very much and [you] …
/r/askTRP14/12/15 06:31 PM
7

It doesn't help that new laws are behind a paywall in here. I never understood how this is supposed to be considered fair in a free society. If ignorance of the law is not a defense, surely you'd at least expect to be able to read the law you're supposed to follow.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/15 01:03 AM
0

Not necessarily a good idea. There's really no telling how the friend will react to the harsh realities of life. He may wake up, but it's much more likely he'll double down on his rationalization, blame OP, even suggest to his wife OP raped her and her going along with it to save face. Better to distance oneself from this kind of disaster in the making.
/r/askTRP12/12/15 07:25 PM
4

As a man, you should have realized by now that your worth is based on your actions. The moment you become a loser, nobody will care about your fate, nobody will come to your help. If nobody is preoccupied with your well-being, then you need to be. Narcissism is simply keeping your best interests first, because they come last to everybody else.
/r/askTRP11/12/15 10:43 PM
1

married to the kind of guy that terpers dream of being So, he's a leader? Again, why does leading need to be about dominance? If he's masculine you don't feel like you're mothering him, I'd call him a leader. If you don't think he leads, I'll say he is, but does it so well that you don't even realize it. He's not in the category of men whose wife and mother would fight, which was my initial point.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:27 AM
0

Who does the driving, family vacation planning, other big decisions? I have a feeling you are the leader, but are very good at delegating. They have learned to respect adults of both sexes If they only respected you, you'd be a pretty shitty leader.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 01:31 AM
0

Do you have kids?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:57 AM
0

I said that when women have petty rivalries between each other, it has absolutely nothing to do with men The petty rivalries have absolutely everything to do with men. Women hate other pretty women because they are sexual competitors. Their jealousies often have to do with status, which is almost always related to a man. And in the case of a fight between a wife and a mother in law, they are competing for the love and control of the man who is husband to one and son to the other. it's the corrup…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:28 AM
1

Why does leadership have to be dominating? Don't you have a boss? Have you ever worked in a team, where someone had to be a team leader? The leadership role is one of responsibility first and foremost, in any enterprise involving more than one person, someone will naturally lead, i.e. take responsibility for that activity going well. Women become very concerned when the men they are invested in are not taking ownership of the situation. Believe your "everyone is exactly equal" fantasy if you wan…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:19 AM
0

I was using modern mockingly to refer to the feminist standard of "woman makes the decisions, man follows". There aren't that many options, either you lead or you don't, and if you don't she'll step up and lead in your stead. Sure, you can disregard the above as bullshit and prefer the explanation that the majority of women are evil bitches. I think it's a bit too simplistic.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:28 PM
4

The trope of the awful mother-in-law exists for a reason. Dalrock had some great insights here and here. The dynamic makes perfect sense once it is understood: guy is brought up in a typical modern family, where his mother wears the pants and his father is pussy-whipped guy learns to emulate his father's passivity and obey his mother, becoming somewhat of a mama's boy guy manages to get a girl to be interested in him, and adopts the same passivity he's operated on all his life mother, who is use…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 03:34 PM
3

This "assigned at birth" bullshit has got to stop. It makes its sound like there was a sorting hat sending babies to the male side or the female side. It's about as idiotic as saying "last time I went to the doctor he assigned me 5'8" and 160 lbs". He didn't assign jack shit, he made an observation, and the "male" and "female" checkboxes on that newborn's form could just as well be called "penis present" and "vulva present".
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:25 PM
8

What incentive, exactly, would that be? Outside of laziness, I can't see why the police would be more prone to ignoring rape accusations than theft cases, domestic violence, night disturbances, fraud, or any other crime where putting someone in jail would not be straightforward. If there is a laziness problem in the force, that's a separate issue, and shouldn't be used to defend skipping the legal system to seek one's own brand of justice. Would you advocate people take up arms and pursue thieve…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 03:09 PM
2

Good question, I can't quite remember! It started as a little feud on twitter, some of the disagreement points probably had to do with race and homosexuality (a bunch of neoreactionary accounts also took part in it), and I remember people accusing one another of being bigots or too PC. It was really a clusterfuck, a lot of people acting like children, when the same disagreements could have been discussed with courtesy. As for your second question, RoK was meant as a kind of buzzfeed of the manos…
/r/askTRP06/12/15 06:25 AM
8

Politics. Roosh is a bit atypical in the sphere because he's one of the few who put himself out publicly, isn't anonymous anymore, and went on a few television programs. It seems that this gave him a bit of a messiah complex, and he tried to establish himself as the leader of the manosphere, and claimed to have invented neomasculinity. He then got into a row with Rollo and that created a bit of a schism, with him and RoK on one side, Rollo and Reddit's TRP on the other. I personally have nothing…
/r/askTRP06/12/15 12:58 AM
3

The first time, she found an earring by my bed, one I had assumed was hers and put on her nightstand. She didn't say a word, just cut contact. Later, she told me she found another girls hair in my bed one of the first nights she stayed over. Lesson fucking learned. Clean sheets always and mind those bobbypins. She never trusted me after, even though I had every intention of commitment by then. Take a step back a look at the situation from her perspective, remember that the frame you project is t…
/r/askTRP02/12/15 03:04 PM
24

What kind of no? If she says "I'm really tired today, but I promise I'll make it up to you tomorrow", and it's a one time thing, there's no problem. If it's the start of a pattern of excuses and cop-outs, then you can show her the door. If you're married, or the situation makes it difficult for you to actually kick her out, retract emotional and financial support, start focusing on your hobbies and apply dread. But if that happens, it will be a symptom of you not keeping your masculine frame, an…
/r/becomeaman30/11/15 05:13 AM
31

In Britain: Englishman who takes woman out for dinner, goes back to her place, has sex but is unable to prove she said yes: RAPIST Pakistani immigrant who pimps out 14 yo girls with his buddies, and gets to sample the merchandise beforehand: NOT A RAPIST Good luck guys, it'll be fun watching from the sidelines.
/r/MGTOW27/11/15 04:11 PM
2

is if they were in a committed relationship from 20 through to 30 (Or similar timeline) and get replaced for a younger piece of ass I won't even feel sorry for those women. Maybe just about as sorry as I would be to hear of a person who got hit while riding a bike, but wasn't wearing a helmet. The crux is the idea of a "committed relationship". We pretend as if it has any meaning, yet we acknowledge that for women, it means "until I find someone better". Why shouldn't it mean the same for men? A…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/15 03:21 PM
1

I hope you have since then found male friends to replace those therapists. You can't expect someone who doesn't care about you to actually help you with your inner demons, and no matter how well-trained they are, this is still just a job for them. It's also good to keep in mind that it's in their interest to keep you coming rather than fully fixing you.
/r/askTRP25/11/15 04:12 AM
2

The professionals you speak about have Psychology degrees, quite a few of them obtained in a Faculty of Arts instead of a Faculty of Science. Feminist doctrine is tightly integrated into their training, they will operate under the blank slate principle, and believe that what works for women should work for men, it's just that men aren't "opening up enough". I wouldn't recommend going to a psychologist except for pretty severe cases of mental illness. I would say that the best person to talk to a…
/r/askTRP23/11/15 06:42 PM
1

Thanks for clarifying. I agree that the blame lies not as much with the police as it does the caller. The police could have handled it better though, once they were on premise, the risk of abduction disappeared, and they should have politely asked the man if the girl was his daughter, not immediately assume it wasn't the case.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 04:23 AM
7

Why just abductions? Why not encourage people to call the police every time they see some black guy acting shady? It might be a minor inconvenience for them, but it certainly could potentially save lives. I know this because there has been at least one case of a shady looking black person killing someone.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 09:38 PM
1

Well, let's try something else then. Would you agree that men have always been the primary victims of rape, because they had to endure the crushing emotions of knowing their daughter was harmed?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 03:16 PM
7

“A man with no enemies is a man with no character.” ― Paul Newman “You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.” ― Winston Churchill Broadly speaking, your enemies are people who do not see things your way, whose interests clash with yours and where only one can be right and have their way. It's true that to have enemies, people that disagree with you need to also have character, otherwise you'd just end up dominating them. I don't believe this is a li…
/r/askTRP05/11/15 03:54 PM
3

Is 'dread game' essentially making them fear losing you? Yes. But remember that women perceive a man's value based on other women's perception of that man (a bit like shares on the stock market). So it's the fear of losing combined with an increase in value when you're showing her other women are interested. So a beta could be instantly perceived as alpha or unattainable by simply cutting contact and applying dread game, even if he's not a true alpha yet? If a car salesman tells you "my deal is …
/r/askTRP04/11/15 03:53 PM
3

The Just World Fallacy is actually really important for a society. We have achieved this level of civilization because the majority of the population believe that working hard, being nice, "doing the right thing" will bring them happiness and a good life, while cheating, stealing and being a jerk will catch up to them. Being bad and having bad things happen to you are related, but not because of some intrinsic cosmic balance. It's the essence prisoner's dilemma: collaboration beats competition i…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 02:43 PM
3

When someone starts a sentence with "It's never OK to ...", they are moralizing, but trying to hide the fact that they're doing it by appealing to some kind of decency argument. Treat them the same you would someone who told you "it is sinful to...".
/r/MensRights30/10/15 04:47 AM
4

I mean I value her friendship a lot but I don't get anything out of it and haven't gotten anything out of it since a year. That's a contradictory statement. Why do you value her friendship? Do you share common hobbies or interests? Is she a great conversationalist? My bet is that the only reason you "value her friendship" is that you are afraid of losing her entirely, so you'll settle for the orbit. The whole "not now, maybe one day" regarding relationships is complete bullshit coming from eithe…
/r/askTRP29/10/15 02:33 PM
20

Nobody is making fun of her appearance. One person implied she's average in the looks department, another said they could feel her anger. People would have derided her had she been a stereotypical tumblrina, so I don't understand what your point is about posting caricatures but not seemingly average people. I posted this because, unlike SJWs, I think a person's appearance says a lot about them and I like to put a face on names. It's not just an opinion she voiced, it's a childish and entitled be…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 10:22 PM
14

Had she been 50lbs heavier, she wouldn't have been pinged on Tinder in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 06:42 PM
48

The girl in question, to give you an idea of how crazy looks like.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 04:48 PM
1

No, I know I should, it's on my list.
/r/askTRP03/10/15 07:27 PM
1

...until something upsets the system and pushes it in a new direction. Conservatives want to rewind the clocks, and as appealing as this idea is, it's unlikely to happen. MRA want to legislate, or convince society (i.e. women) to consciously change their behavior. Also unlikely to happen. So what's left? A technological breakthrough (sexbots, VR or something else we haven't even dreamed of) or a demographic change (brought on by ethnic and cultural migration, and perhaps even by enough men wakin…
/r/askTRP03/10/15 05:34 PM
3

Hypergamy can be blamed on one thing and one thing only: evolution. Maybe /u/friendlysociopathic makes it look like he's blaming men, but I think he was just offering a counterpoint. It's not women's behaviors that are detrimental to society, it's human behavior that is socially unrestricted. Institutionalized monogamy was making sure neither the most attractive men, nor the above-average women could follow their instincts and spoil it for the rest of society. Feminists, in their great wisdom, d…
/r/askTRP03/10/15 04:13 PM
8

What's interesting is that all these cases of mass shootings where the perpetrator is sexually frustrated, they end up dying. It's interesting because in cases when they don't, they become a convicted serial killer, which as we know is actually very popular with the ladies. Humans are very intuitive creatures. Could it be that these guys subconsciously know that this is the kind of aggressiveness that actually would make them attractive? They may just be unable to channel it into lifting, confid…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 01:45 PM
4

Well, now I can reveal it to you: a similar system was implemented in some European countries prior to WWII. They are regarded as example antisemitic policies. When I point out that they are effectively affirmative action, people get mad. I personally prefer there to be no affirmative action, it's artificial and I prefer problems to arise out of the nature of things rather than external rules. But I dislike hypocrisy even more, so if people are onboard with affirmative action, they should be on …
/r/MensRights19/09/15 02:51 AM
5

What do you think of this situation: in a specific society, Jews make about 5% of the population, yet hold 70% of university teaching staff. A program of affirmative action states that a minimum of 90% of positions should be filled by non-jewish professors, effectively limiting the jewish staff representation to 10%. In this example, the effect of thinking people are there just because of the quota would be less important, since they would now be in the majority. Is such a system fair in your ey…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:11 PM
2

Similar effects on two very dissimilar entities will likely yield different results. You're probably thinking about pair-bonding, and the fact that each new partner reduces the pair-bonding effect of intimacy. This is bad for women because devotion is something men value in their partner, and it additionally reduces the risk a particular wave of emotion makes the woman want to break up. Since for women, obtaining commitment is harder than sex, loss of pair-bonding ability, which both reduces the…
/r/askTRP18/09/15 05:48 PM
2

They aren't looking for anything, it's all instinctive. Remember how natural selection works: women who were attracted to more violent men were more likely to survive, while those attracted to more passive ones were slowly weeded out. Bad boy is no more high value sperm than a slutty hole is fertile and healthy.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 03:49 PM
4

I know what he meant by nice guy. My point is that what he is lamenting in nice guys, none of which I dispute, is not why women do not like them. Women don't like nice guys because their wiring is repulsed by the beta tells. A guy displaying alpha traits can be just as unprincipled, unenterprising and lazy. This all goes back to the myth that women are somehow less shallow than men when it comes to raw attraction. And shitting on nice guys doesn't help others gain in status, that itself is a pre…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 03:45 PM
11

That's not a good argument. Why the fuck would women like bad boys? They're impulsive, undisciplined, violent and usually never achieve anything of value in life. We know why women like bad boys. We know why they dislike (specifically, aren't attracted to) nice guys.It has nothing to do with being of good character.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 02:58 PM
21

This list is hilarious: NO GAMES THEY’RE HAPPIER, STRONGER VERSIONS OF THEIR FORMER SELVES THEY KNOW WHAT THEY WANT THEY DON’T NEED RESCUING THEY’RE LOOKING FOR A PARTNER, NOT A FATHER FOR THEIR CHILD LONELY DOESN’T EQUAL DESPERATE EASILY IMPRESSED Basically the exact opposite of the truth, except perhaps the last point, which is there only to trick the very desperate and promise them a lay without too much effort.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:17 PM
3

You're judging him by post-sexual-revolution, almost feminist moral standards, where "sex is moral as long as you are being honest". He's "wasting her good years", so fucking what? She's a big girl, she can make her own decisions, and if she makes those off of incomplete or erroneous information, she is definitely not alone, there's a whole world of betas out there in the exact same boat.
/r/askTRP15/09/15 01:25 PM
1

First, regarding the "viewing increases demand", I have to ask the same question I asked below: would you consume it if it were legal? The economics of something that only appeals to a tiny fraction of a population and is repulsive to the majority are not the same as those of other consumer goods. I have found no good argument that would tie decriminalization of possession (not of sale, and certainly not of production) to an increase in production. And considering other images, you are right, th…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 10:01 PM
1

Watching child porn increases demand, this increased production. I've heard this claim many times, without any backing whatsoever. Let me ask you, if child porn were legal, would you start consuming it? Pedophiles are already breaking the law, so I doubt very much that decriminalization would increase the number of viewers. Neither am I convinced that it being legal would somehow make existing pedophiles want to consumer more of it. And I never suggested decriminalizing the sale, only the posses…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 09:50 PM
1

The criminalization of pictures was born out of feelings, and we keep seeing the crazy effects of the law. But if we were to put those feelings aside, we'd see how utterly ridiculous and counter-productive this approach is. There is no other instance where possessing a picture is a crime. It may be evidence of another crime, but just having that picture is no crime of itself. On top of potentially turning sexting teens into criminals, child porn laws also have an interesting double-standard: it …
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 01:55 PM
2

Wikipedia does.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 01:17 AM
1

It's very possible that the current exact numbers are a bit different than when the tests were created. But when they were, they were specifically designed for parity between the genders.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 01:16 AM
10

When the first IQ tests were created, men had higher scores than women, so they were tweaked until both sexes averaged at the same score, and that average score would be 100. So men and women have the same average IQ, but that's by design.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 03:42 PM
2

There's nothing wrong with a young, religious woman who wants to remain a virgin until marriage and who is actively looking for a husband. You say she's a med student, is she looking to find a husband right away, or does she want to be "secure in her career" first, i.e. wait until she's an inch away from the wall? If she's the latter, and you sure you don't want to marry her, simply walk away. You can try to trick her into having sex with you, but she'll likely hate you for it afterwards. There'…
/r/askTRP28/08/15 01:32 PM
7

Age of consent is a weird thing. On the one hand, we gladly criminalize a 18yo sleeping with a 17yo, on the other, we try very hard to pass two 13yo having sex as harmless experimentation, and want to start sex ed when kids are 8. If it looks like all this doesn't make sense, it's because the concern isn't really about when people acquire the maturity to have sex, but how to politically weaponize the different scenarios. On the one hand, feminists want girls to slut it up as early as possible, (…
/r/MGTOW25/08/15 08:35 PM
4

And the "and now you've upset me" is a shit test. As long as you handled that by making it the non-issue that it is, you're good.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/15 01:36 PM
2

You're the one re-characterizing everything I said, turning my potentials into absolute statements, so you can can accuse me of making things up. I ask again, how many successful malpractice case have you heard of where a lawyer simply doing a bad job was enough? If suing lawyers is as easy as you claim, and you claim to be a lawyer yourself (something which I specifically said I am not), it should be easy for you to answer.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 06:18 PM
1

why you would think lawyers would possibly be immune from malpractice claims. I never said such a thing. I said suing a lawyer is hard, I explained why suing lawyers should be hard, and I added that it's doubly hard because the law is the domain of the people you are trying to sue. I'm well aware that lawyers may be disbarred, I just don't know the specifics of how you'd go about it. I'm curious, have you actually witnessed many suits for negligent defense, and most importantly, any that were wo…
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 03:43 PM
2

Or I could not read the book, not get married, not spend a lot of money on a good lawyer, not have a long divorce proceeding and have a complete peace of mind. I don't call reading a book and double-checking the work of my lawyer a particularly simple process.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 02:27 PM
13

That has been every single argument that I heard from marriage, once I explained that I didn't feel like gambling with all the assets I have acquired in life so far. That has been the argument from my parents: "but son, you can't just live your life being afraid, you'll end up lonely and miserable! We too have taken a risk, we didn't know what life would bring us blah blah blah". Yes, they took a "risk" in a country and at a time where divorce was something shameful, and someone knew someone who…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 11:45 PM
3

If I had an attorney draw up a contract to buy half a company and then after I pay for half of the company I find out that the contract was not valid and I lost my money and got zero percent of the company I'm sure. I could sue the attorney. You could have a case if you could somehow prove malicious intent, for instance that he was paid by the other party to the contract to make it fail. And then, I'm not even sure you could sue him, you'd probably want to file a complaint against the bar. Other…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 11:30 PM
25

You wish! Suing an attorney is harder than suing a cop who mistreated you. Courts won't allow it for at least the practical reason of avoiding an unending flow of countersuits. But even if you could find an exception, who runs the show? You'll agree it would be unwise to resolve a dispute with a plumber by challenging him to a plumbing contest.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 09:14 PM
2

I'm not a lawyer, but I did take some law courses in college. The judge didn't throw out a legal contract, he declared the contract invalid under duress. And you don't understand what the concept of duress means. It does not mean she was fearing for her life for decades. It does not mean the person who coerced her did something criminal. There doesn't even need to be a person applying duress. All duress means is that extreme external circumstances made the person act in a way different from how …
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 09:07 PM
0

You'd think a millionaire would have access to a good lawyer.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 06:32 PM
1

BTW don't befriend any man who works in courts. Or rather, do. Do befriend the judge, the lawyers, everyone who has any power in the legal system. These people are human too (which isn't always a good thing) and are more likely to be nice to a friend.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 06:30 PM
3

I haven't heard of any case of an asset distribution order like that being appealed. Normally, you can't just go to a different judge, you can appeal to a higher court (for regular civil cases, regular court -> superior court -> supreme court, not sure if this also goes for family law cases), and you need to state grounds for the appeal. Grounds are either a misuse, concealment or fabrication of facts or evidence, or a faulty interpretation of the law by the presiding judge. You also need to sho…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 06:25 PM
3

In this specific case, society is to blame to about the same extent as a situation where someone fucks themselves up financially by going a quarter million bucks in debt for an sociology degree. Yes, they made bad choices, and that's on them, but you can't completely ignore "the path" that your family, friends, educators and mentors say is good for you. And he didn't exactly "blame" society, he jus said that's the trajectory it's going in. Society, in the end, is just the sum of the people it's …
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 06:05 PM
233

I love how people insist that prenups protect your assets, as long as you do it correctly. But that's like saying climbing the Everest is perfectly safe, as long as you have the right equipment and preparation. You can always analyze a case that didn't go well, and point to the things people should have done differently. What makes prenups and climbing the Everest so dangerous is precisely the fact that there are many, many ways things can go wrong, and even hired professionals get it wrong some…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 05:56 PM
9

almost every state or province That's a bit of an exaggeration. In the U.S., it's 10 states out of 50 + DC, and most of them don't have it happen just with cohabitation. It's worse in Canada, with Quebec, Ontario and B.C., but it's still not "almost every". Be careful, don't be paranoid.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 04:18 PM
3

Men exert and are masters at overt power, women exert and are masters at covert power. If men and women are made equal, their overt power becomes equal, but women still retain their covert power. They thus become the superior of men.
/r/askTRP09/08/15 03:29 PM
3

For romantic love. Interestingly, the opposite works best for filial love (your mom will love you no matter what, your father's love is conditional on making him proud).
/r/askTRP01/08/15 04:26 PM
66

Oftentimes female genital mutilation involves the equivalent, the chopping off of the clitoris. Have you even read the article? What most people don’t know, however, is that infibulation, which includes the complete removal of external female genitalia and a suturing of the vaginal opening, occurs in less than 1 percent of all documented cases of FGM, according to the World Health Organization. By far, the most common form of FGM involves a procedure in which only the female foreskin is removed.…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:47 PM
2

No, I believe the destruction of marriage will have a very negative impact on the success of western civilization. However, I'm not a seer, and I don't think anyone can predict what will happen with certainty. One possible scenario is a progressive disinvestment of western males, fall of productivity, fall of birth rates, very heavy immigration from countries that still have strong marital traditions, resulting in an accelerated change in culture. At this point, emerging mega-economies like Chin…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 12:15 AM
3

Alcohol is a crutch for both genders. It's quite unreal to hear the college kids basically admitting that there's just no getting laid, worse, no interaction with the other sex without it.
/r/askTRP28/07/15 08:58 PM
1

Yup, that's why I said "very specific income bracket".
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 07:48 PM
3

Obviously, but I'm supposing there's no divorce. But even then, the tax benefits only apply in certain economic condition, in a lot of cases being married will not give you any tax benefit, and in some cases it will give you a penalty. It's there nominally, but it's not really an argument for marriage.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 07:46 PM
5

If you look at abrahamic religions, divorce was originally only permissible in case of infidelity by the woman, and even then not easily granted. One of Christianity's contribution was to say "no exception", because it is a slippery slope. It's quite easy to relax the definition of both infidelity and physical abuse. It's exactly what we have done. Infidelity can become flirting, which can become "s/he doesn't love me anymore". Likewise, physical abuse becomes psychological abuse which becomes a…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 06:43 PM
7

Not in 2015. But there used to be. When divorce was not possible, marriage got you a wife for life, who you could count on to maintain you a pleasant home. It got you the status of a future father, and legitimized your children (an unmarried woman's kids are her own, a married woman's kids are her husband's). It was in essence peace of mind for both parties, since it was a lifelong commitment. And some men long after something like that. But indeed, today, there is absolutely 0 benefit for the v…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 04:44 PM
8

For now. There's already been cases where medical confidentiality of donors was pitted against the right of individuals to know their parents. So far, the judges have ruled in favor of the former, likely because there's a lot of money that can be made from sperm donation, and it would be premature to kill that cash cow. But men get divorce raped every day and more clueless guys still get married, so I can very well see the children winning out in the end, if the courts believe men will keep dona…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 01:42 AM
3

This is symptomatic of people who never had anyone tell them to shut the hell up when they were growing up. Fatherlessness, or beta fatherhood, obviously factors heavily into the equation.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 11:11 PM
17

That has a really nice authoritarian vibe to it. "I noticed you forgot to add Hail Hitler". "It's nice and all, but why have you omitted to mention the name of our beloved First Secretary?"
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 05:22 PM
9

Standards for code are not going to change because of a code of conduct. Hopefully not, but don't be so sure about it. SJW like to infiltrate everything, all you need is for them to be in a position of influence and they can start accepting patches from people they like and rejection them from those they don't. The damage will be done before people have time to realize what's going on and do something about it. It's certainly recoverable, disgruntled people can leave, fork the existing work and …
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 05:15 PM
45

It could have, but it sounds like you knew what you were doing, and were a good judge of character. Don't apologize for it.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 04:43 PM
2

Yes, CPS takes them away and the parents (this one applies to both genders) don't have to care for them anymore. So in effect, no responsibility. But that's not what we're talking about, this is specifically about the gap between the options of women who don't want to be a parent (abortion, adoption, abandonment) vs those of men (none).
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 02:27 PM
2

You'd probably have a point if it was now legal to kill people. But it isn't, that law is enforced for both men and women (albeit women get off much more easily for it than men, but that's a different topic).
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 04:55 AM
8

I ask you again, why? And why apply it only to men in that case? You might very well say "well I think it should apply to women", I'm sure that will help. It's harsh on the kid, sure, but "what's best for the children" is what got us into this mess. Women fuck up, then "let's do what's best for the children" and you have men compelled to fix stuff up. Wife decides to divorce? "Best for the children" and the man has to pay and gets to see them every second weekend. Got cuckolded? "Best for the ch…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 12:14 AM
10

The law follows what /u/Denswend remarked above. It's not about principles of the nature of fatherhood, but how to rationalize the need for particular men to pay.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 11:52 PM
23

If the child really is his seed, then he has permanent obligations to her. Why? Because of rules of morality? Whose morality? We have abandoned all rules of morality for women, how do you suggest we hold women accountable? They can abort or abandon as they see fit, and the social climate is pushing hard to make sure every single weed of criticism and non-compliance to that imperative is pulled out and shamed. Philosophically, perhaps it is better to hold everyone accountable, and I do believe th…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 11:46 PM
1

Don't remember, something like the 3rd result from a google search for "OCR". It was pretty accurate, it got a little confused with the image that has text embedded in it, and for some reason it detected almost all periods as dashes. Took me about 3 minutes to post-process the results.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 03:14 PM
11

I didn't, I used an OCR. Just had to format and correct some detection mistakes. Typing it by hand would have been madness.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 07:03 PM
8

I don't know, I would assume these kinds of exercises were conducted in many places, so while you could get a short list, it would be hard to pinpoint it to the exact person. Also, if there were fewer details, people would also have called it fake. I'm absolutely not convinced that it's genuine, I posted it mainly on the oft chance someone might recognize this exercise and confirm that this really was conducted in this way.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:25 PM
59

Text version if you hate scrolling or are on mobile: Alright /pol/, here is something to reinforce your opinions on women working in teams. I am working as a team building coach in Germany. I hold courses for a company were teams are being tested and need to work together to fulfil their tasks. The goal is to have a better working team afterwards and to address problems within the team. Now before I get startet none of this is scientific. We use certain tests that need certain skills and are mea…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 04:18 PM
32

Some women don't like being catcalled. Women love being catcalled by attractive men, men they see as superior in value to them. But they hate being catcalled by inferior men. This is actually more general than catcalling, it applies to any demonstration of sexual interest, including the most polite request for a date. But this poses a problem, because the men whose catcalls are unappreciated are going to be overwhelmingly low-status, but masculine men, of african-american or hispanic ethnicity. …
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:29 PM
25

It's the logical conclusion when you put feminist theory first and then try to fit real-world data into it. The ideology says: catcalls are bad and hurt women, it would be better if we didn't have it. Her personal experience says: men don't notice me anymore, and that hurts my feelings. To fit data to theory, you say "it hurts my feelings, but it shouldn't be that way. If it shouldn't be that way, it means an evil external force made it that way. We have a name for an evil exterior force: The Pa…
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:08 PM
26

As we were growing up, my parents set up a college fund for both my sister and myself. They made sure to invest the same amount in both accounts, to be as fair as possible (something my mom liked to stress all the time). When I turn 18, I get my share, pay tuition, live frugally and invest the rest. I also get summer jobs, even though I technically didn't need the money, but getting the experience was nice. Result: I graduate with no debt, and a sizeable savings account. My sister, who gets an i…
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 03:56 PM
16

My views on marriage slightly differ with some TRP philosophies on marriage, only because I truly believe that the techniques and strategies learned through a TRP mindset can help you maximize your happiness no matter what your relationship status is. Then they don't differ. TRP says "don't get married, spin plates" because it's the simplest form of a very practical advice. Getting married exposes you to the risk of a divorce and its financial fallout, while spinning plates is the fastest way to…
/r/askTRP19/07/15 06:47 PM
44

You're think that if you were in their shoes, it would make sense to shut down the little voice that says "he's not paying attention to meeeeee!" so that you could keep your partner manly and therefore attractive. But they are neither aware of what makes men attractive in their eyes, nor are they good strategists. They're unable to properly evaluate long-term effects when faced with feelings of the immediate. The only solution for men is to appear uncontrollable to women, which starts with a com…
/r/MGTOW19/07/15 06:28 PM
93

Not just her feelings, she said "self-preservation". She is putting her own well-being, which includes feelings but also provision, above the preferences of men. It's this attitude that should convince every man to not worry about "stinging a girl along". Do what they do, don't outright lie about wanting to marry them, but don't worry about them overestimating your investment, since your future, just like their past, is "inconsequential".
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 06:17 PM
31

The answer to a woman who doesn't want to reveal her past is for you to not reveal your future plans for her. A woman who says men are insecure for caring about her past should be told she is insecure for demanding signs of comitmemt. If she's had lots before you, she should have the possibility of having lots after you, but it won't be her decision anymore.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 04:39 PM
1

You clearly don't understand what AWALT means. The male equivalent would be "men, even the smart ones, do stupid shit when presented with a nice pair of tits. AMALT". Now this is obviously a generalization, and not every single man is exactly like that, some of them are gay, some have low libido, some of them have acted like that in the past and have found the discipline that will prevent them from falling for a pretty woman. The point of saying AMALT in this case is to recognize that as evolved…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:59 PM
1

Saying women and men are physiologically and psychologically different is also sexism. Also, saying all women have breasts is a generalization. You can cling to your ideology, or you can open your eyes and take a look at the real world and its sometimes ugly truths. You're right, this sub is not TRP, and it should focus on trying to change laws, while TRP will take care of giving men actionable advice for their day to day lives. But it should also not try to deny reality, there's enough places t…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:10 PM
1

I know, that's why I can't find any other criticism other than to say it becomes tiresome after a while. He set out to do something very specific and does it well. But I see /u/Lurker_IV's point about this being more at home in a rants section.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:04 PM
4

I partly share your feelings. I think he makes some very good points, he argues his positions well and refers to formal logic most of the time. It's just all he seems to do is call out stupid people, and that gets tiresome. Not because he's wrong, not because he calls them names (it's almost always deserved) but because it's always more of the same.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:51 PM
2

It's about moving the goalposts. That's what all discussion about rape has been over the past half a century. It's important people think of rape as a violent attack but that it be legislated as a lack of communication. The reaction of these groups is just the latest effort in that direction.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:52 PM
5

If it's any consolation: she chose YOU. That's the wrong perspective to look at this from. It's the same bullshit people tell a guy who just found out the unicorn he married got 20 dicks in her before being legally allowed to drink: "It doesn't matter who she slept with in the past, in the end she chose you!". No. Women chose who they spread their legs for, not who they give their provision and commitment to, that's what men do. It's about as out of touch as telling a girl the guy who slept with…
/r/askTRP13/07/15 07:55 PM
3

When the family didn't update him, then told him to walk on eggshells around her, that's when the guy should have simply said that he "can't do this" and that when/if his gf is ready, she can come talk to him, but until then, he needs a break too to think about the situation. Now, more generally, if a girl has been raped and she comes to you for comfort, you may not want to break up with her (at least right away). If she shows that she cares about you and makes effort for the situation to return…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 03:30 PM
43

I'm not sure they actually realized it, I think it's more of a subconscious process. Social pain is real, women react to it by crying and gathering sympathy, men must outlive it and gain respect. But what do you do when the pain is unbearable, there was no strong male model to teach you how to cope with it, there is no sight of success if you persevere and the entertainment industry of your culture provides a release for deep fantasies and acts as a medication? You take that drug, it makes you f…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 07:31 PM
11

Perhaps, but they've had an excellent track record so far. I'm a keen follower of their work, I haven't yet seen a case they lost. Granted, it could be they pass up difficult cases, but there's enough egregious violations to keep their hands full. They dealt with a lot of instances where colleges invoked Title IX as their reasoning to censor "unsafe" speech, and as far as I know, every single time courts have ruled the First Amendment is stronger than Title IX.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 07:14 PM
3

There's usually a lot of room for interpretation of most religious texts, but not when it comes to intergender relations. No society following a cuckold religious principle would have made it to modern times, any moderately aggressive neighbor would have decimated it.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/15 03:36 PM
10

"No hymen do diamond" is a catchy phrase, but the advice goes beyond just the presence of the piece of skin. Marrying a virgin means marrying a young girl (early 20s) who you know has had limited romantic experience and no sexual experience because of her upbringing. Obviously, your 30-something empowered woman, who comes from a culture where virginity is still prized, and who pretends she's still a virgin is full of it and you should know better.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/15 04:01 PM
1

Even if she went to Cambridge, even if she comes from a rich family and has been the center of attention since even before developing breasts, I would still not discount the pull of rubbing shoulders with top celebrities. I said 95%, not 99% for a reason. You sound like a very level-headed guy, and you it looks like you know what you're getting into. Like I said, my advice is for you to let things happen, but be ready for anything. It seems you are prepared for the negative possible outcomes, an…
/r/askTRP02/07/15 12:45 AM
1

I think you misunderstand some of my points. I'm not saying your girlfriend will cheat, I actually think she won't cheat, because whatever she may do can be very easily repackaged as not cheating: she can call for a break, or simply spend a lot of time with some guy where "nothing happens", then "officially breaks up" with you, then moves on with that guy. Cheating is something married women do when they can't just leave because there are kids involved. I also don't think you should break up wit…
/r/askTRP02/07/15 12:04 AM
1

I might get some flak for saying this, but it needs to be said. Modeling is soft prostitution, it's just a degree removed from the real thing. You should not think about potentially marrying her. I'm sure she's as beautiful and as smart as you describe her, and that should be all anybody would want in a wife. But consider this: her intellect got her into the same prestigious university as you, probably in a competitive field of study, and she was doing really well. Yet, instead of pursuing that …
/r/askTRP01/07/15 09:28 PM
14

Absolutely. It's such an ego boost to think "I'm so good, she left that other guy to be with me!". It's an illusion. If you thought the guy was great, and you're just better, she demonstrated that she can decide to leave a great guy at the drop of a hat, and unless you are objectively the Best Man On Earth, it can just as easily happen to you. If you thought the guy wasn't so great, then she demonstrated she'd rather stay with someone she's not happy with than be alone, i.e. she uses men she doe…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/15 10:24 PM
39

Hopefully, your being masculine and them being used to your discipline would mitigate this quite a bit. Sluttery happens most often because of "daddy issues", i.e. lack of a true masculine head of the household. If you apply fatherly love, i.e. conditional love based on a certain degree of obedience and performance, your kids will want to make you proud, and your daughters will fear disappointing you. Then having a frank discussion with them, explaining the basic idea of female SMV should be eno…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 01:50 AM
12

Do the Rabbis even care? I'm under the impression modern judaism care much less about promiscuity than christianity or islam. Maybe the Rabbis do care, it's just the (female-led) families don't and stopped listening to their religious leaders. The only thing they seem to care about is that the JAP ends up marrying a "good jewish boy", and the whole slutting it up before that happens is ok. The whole thing seems to have been codified in some recent book, if I recall correctly.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 01:41 AM
1

You might be right. At the same time, the article includes a short video titled "State Representative Patricia Todd says Alabama probate judges who defy the law should be removed". By "forced to perform", I meant that too, that if they don't comply, they'll be replaced by someone who does.
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 08:42 PM
1

Yeah, the purpose of marriage sure has changed. It used to be a big thing, with everyone you knew present, so that your whole community was there to witness your lifelong engagement. Now, it's 4 people in a room, the couple, one witness and whatever public official is doing it. What's stopping the next step, as you said: a formed filled out with nobody present. I believe you can get a divorce by filling an online form in the Czech Republic, so marriage can't be far away. But I believe it's much …
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 08:08 PM
2

I don't know, I've heard plenty of cases of people younger than 95 declared "unfit to face trial" or "unfit for incarceration".
/r/MensRights28/06/15 07:44 AM
27

If you think it's fair and just that a man can skip out on supporting his dying wife just by filing for divorce, you are a miserable human being. Considering a very large number of women divorce their husband when he loses his job and otherwise gets into financial trouble, yes, I do think a man should be able to do the same. The guy is 95 years old though. At this point, I'd simply not show up to any court hearing or pay anything. What are they going to do, haul him to jail?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 12:01 AM
5

The thing is that in the US, Mormons are localized in a few states and quite influential there. I don't know the specifics of Utah, but either the law is vague or they decide not to enforce it. I know that in Canada and some European countries, where there are only tiny groups of polygamists, there have been cases of prosecution. Often, they're a way to go after cult leaders, so I'm not sure they'd want to enforce it otherwise, but they have that legal opening if they wish to use it.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 04:40 AM
4

The whole thing is just an extension of regular, two-party marriage: provision in exchange for sexual access. Polygamy was reserved for wealthy men who could afford a harem. From what I remember, the Quran specifically says, do not take more wives than you think you can appropriately love (read, sex up) and care for (read, pay for their shit). It may be attractive if you have the means and the sex drive, but of course loses all appeal once divorce and alimony come into the picture.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 03:20 AM
6

That's not exactly true. Anti-polygamy laws are quite vague and difficult to enforce, but they are there. If the government believes a man lives with many wives, contracting marriage with them in a country where polygamy is legal, they can charge him with a crime. The obvious hilarity comes from the fact that polyamory, i.e. the same thing minus the "oppressive" part that comes with a marriage license is perfectly legal. This inconsistency, coupled with the fact some people just need to fight fo…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 03:14 AM
42

Yeah, it does sound weird. A family men becoming bisexual all of a sudden? It's possible, but I think it's more probable it's a lie to get to her. Most women are absolutely repulsed by the idea of having sex with a man who has had sex with another man.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 03:06 AM
2

Worrying about being known as a player is like worrying about getting too swole at the gym. Or for a girl, worrying your cooking is too good. I can think of very few instances where that would actually lead to problems.
/r/askTRP25/06/15 09:06 PM
6

Also, #3: Don’t listen to her when she talks to you or even better yet, interrupt when she’s sharing her heart with corrections to her thinking and answers for her problems. Second half is also important, because too many men don't get it: when a chick is telling your her problems, she doesn't want you to fix them, she wants pity. The proper answer is to give her a little if it's truly something bad, and laugh at it if it isn't. But don't ever solve her problems for her, no matter how easy and t…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 06:28 PM
1

In light of the police stuff mentioned above, it's possible she mistook you for a cop. If she's paranoid, and usually deals with 35 yo who know the etiquette, your message might have triggered some red flags. Maybe, maybe not. In the end, follow everyone else's advice and forget about the incident. Try another girl, maybe go to Mexico or some other place where chicks will be desperate for your money. And lose her number, really, there's no reason to hold onto it.
/r/askTRP16/06/15 07:43 PM
1

They're related, but I wouldn't put them in the same category. When used among men to establish social hierarchy, it's playful, and you immediately get the feedback that you failed ("I was just joking man, cheer up!"). You can use the same kind of playful banter on women. But when women shit test, it's not about establishing hierarchy, it's not playful, and you get no feedback. That's why men are so bad at learning to deal with them. The point is not to establish dominance over someone, but to t…
/r/askTRP16/06/15 06:55 PM
2

Men don't shit test, women do. A shit test is simply a demand woman makes, with the hope you will dismiss it as a caprice. The goal is to test masculinity. So why would a man shit test? You're not testing for masculinity (at least you shouldn't be), you already know if you want to bang her about 3 seconds after seeing her. You're supposed to pass her tests so she spreads her legs for you. When that is done, you can start "testing" her for LTR material if you wish, but until that happens, she is …
/r/askTRP16/06/15 05:28 PM
10

At 22, it's pretty much expected that your SMV is relatively low, unless you happen to be a famous, wealthy or blessed with ridiculously good genes. Even if you stay relatively beta, by the time you hit 35, chances are you'll have gained social confidence simply through the passage of time, you'll have established yourself in your job, acquired some money, thickened a bit if you happen to be the lanky type. The problem with staying with an older woman is that by the time you reach that point, sh…
/r/askTRP12/06/15 12:39 AM
9

Courts don't consider being tied to a financial responsibility against your will a danger. Or simply, they don't care about boys. Now what the supreme court is saying is that the law cannot be made gender neutral in some case. So what's the rationale for making it equal in other cases?
/r/PussyPass09/06/15 06:36 PM
1

But then I am told unless I break a hundred women first by plating them via emotional abuse, I'm not qualified? I never said that, and I doubt anyone ever uttered those words. You may be confounding this with the idea that the more women you have slept with, the less you can be influenced and lose dearly as a result. But I don't think anyone believes this comes at no cost: pair bonding ability is affected. The ones who advocate spinning plates simply suggest that there is more to gain than to lo…
/r/askTRP03/06/15 12:10 AM
2

you become more and more reinforced in your belief that there are no high-quality LTR/marriage worthy women anymore, because you essentially only hang out with low quality and non LTR/marriage worthy women You sound like my mom, when a few year ago, before finding TRP, I expressed my frustration at not being able to find a good woman. Women are like liquid, they take the shape of the container they are put in. A low-quality woman is just a woman who started ok, and let her surroundings shape her…
/r/askTRP02/06/15 08:38 PM
1

You need to realize this movie was made to sell to as many people as possible. Men go see that movie to gaze at the nice CGI and get a kick out of seeing everything getting destroyed. Women don't care so much about that, but you need to sell it to them as well. So how do you do that? You insert the "uber masculine ex who comes to rescue me even when I've been shitty to him" trope. There is no pretense that this movie depicts anything realistic, just accept that the character is the way he is bec…
/r/askTRP02/06/15 06:10 PM
2

pretty much every rule on TRP has exceptions. That's what happens when we deal with biological beings with a normal distribution for pretty much every trait the impulse of having children and it being a requirement for happiness does not imply the happiness lasts after the children are born. Men have an impulse to bed women, they're miserable if they can't get any, but getting plenty does not mean they'll suddenly be happy. Children require work, and if you're used to a high level of comfort, an…
/r/askTRP02/06/15 04:14 PM
1

We put that under the rug since we werent officially 'together' at the time. I always chuckle when I hear that expression, "officially together". It's what women have invented to rationalize their sleeping around. Women who use that excuse are good for plates, where you can take back and twist that little status to your liking. For relationships, either she's ready to follow you to the depths of hell or you're the current sucker financing her life. I know you said you "love her to death", but yo…
/r/askTRP01/06/15 06:04 PM
28

I have her phone password so I can check later to see if anything is going on If that sounds like a good idea to you, it's not surprising she did what she did. She knows you are too scared to confront her about it, and she's already lost her respect for you. This relationship is unsalvageable, the only thing you can save is your self-respect by walking away.
/r/askTRP01/06/15 05:51 PM
1

What would you like me to go on about?
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 04:29 AM
12

Then we should do something about these female suicides. After all, they're leaving fathers, brothers and boyfriends really, really sad.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 07:14 PM
1

Quantum physics predicts very well-defined statistical distributions that are completely testable. This has nothing to do with social sciences.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 05:05 AM
3

Psychology, as it is practiced today, is not science. It is, at best, social science, AKA statistical pattern recognition. Science produces hypotheses in the form of laws, that are able to be tested by experimentation or observation. If the hypothesis is correct, the results will match the predictions exactly. What science about male-female relationships has academic psychology produced? What predictions does a psychological hypothesis make that I am guaranteed to be able to reproduce, given the…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 12:28 AM
45

It's difficult if you care about the person. Ultimately, you have to distinguish between her being mad because she didn't get what she wanted, and her being truly unhappy about something. Like with a child, you can't just give them what they want because they start to cry. There's a reason treating your woman like a 7 yo is very good advice.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 12:03 AM
1

She might just refuse because "she can't believe you don't trust her". And even if her refusal revealed you're not the daddy, so what? As far as the government is concerned, you're the daddy, if she decides to divorce you, you pay child support. You can't question that, since you're assumed to be a father if you were married to her, and you can't get a paternity test because she doesn't agree to it. Paternity testing is illegal except when it's actually your kid and the woman wants to prove it t…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 11:06 PM
23

Isn't this it though? Infidelity is not bad if parties are consenting. Me imposing it on my husband under the threat of divorce rape is consent for my infidelity, but even if my husband genuinely convinced me to let him have his fun, it wasn't consent because I was emotionally coerced blah blah blah...
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 09:45 PM
20

Except there is no such thing as a second wife in western countries, and people are fighting very hard to keep polygamy illegal, even among the arguments used for homosexual marriage. That's why she can do this: even if his SMV is technically higher, no woman will want to be just the mistress of a married man. I can guarantee you that she would not even think of proposing to "open the relationship" if they were just cohabiting. It's worth repeating, again and again, until it starts becoming the …
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 09:40 PM
4

From what I remember, the way it works is that you need the consent of the person to do any genetical testing. When the person cannot consent (e.g.: a newborn), you need the written consent of the legal guardian. In the case of parents, that means both the father and the mother. So it's not illegal per se, but you see how that effectively means you can't know if your child is yours: the mother can say no, and it won't be done, and if you do it without her knowledge, you are in the eyes of the la…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 08:32 PM
1

It does, thanks for taking the time to explain. I didn't know so much of cognitive ability was linked to the X. But I guess that's further evidence of gender psychological differences, it can't be on the Y, and if it were anywhere else, you'd expect very little variability.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 06:36 PM
1

Ok, I'm not in a medical field, so I don't want to argue with someone who is, but: it's not because it's recessive, it's because each cell in an XX individual randomly deactivates one of the Xs Isn't that the definition of recessive? You have a chromosome pair, and therefore two alleles for the same gene. Each version can be recessive or dominant. That's what I remember from biology class. Do sex chromosomes behave differently?
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 06:11 PM
3

What would need to happen is for "idiot" and "genius" genes to be recessive, which is not a crazy assumption. But that would only imply the idiocy of the father would not be passed to the son, not that the son wouldn't end up being an idiot, since his mother could be carrying these genes without expressing them. I looked at cognition related to the X chromosome, and I could only find references to social cognition (which makes a ton of sense), not cognition in general. I'm sure the X carried qui…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 03:17 PM
22

Not yet, but if it were to happen, it would probably follow the logic applied in European countries. "Preserving the peace within families" in France, "protecting genetic confidentiality" in the UK...
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 03:02 PM
4

It is not our job to save every man. It is the job of every man to save himself. Absolutely, that's why it's not OP's duty to warn the man, but if he feels compelled to do it, and he feels he can do this without risking much (he would know better than any of us), then let him. OP didn't learn it from this Sandra, he learned it from some drunken colleague. That sounds like enough degree of separation to be safe. The other question is whether Sandra could her OP professionally. She seems pretty hi…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 03:00 PM
25

You can't be "cocky-funny" on message #4,356 if she thinks she has you figured out, or she "has you" period. Cocky-funny is just part of the larger goal of mystery and unpredictability, it gives her this feeling that she's dealing with a wild beast she can't tame. It's sad indeed, but that means you simply cannot provide the sense of security these women also crave. Dread is not part of the game, it is the game. She needs to have at least a tiny part of her that worries you'll leave and find som…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 02:53 PM
12

If I recall correctly, basically all genes related to cognition are carried on the X chromosome I think you recall incorrectly, because I'm pretty sure we have no idea what genes are related to cognition. Perhaps some very specific behavioral traits, but not "all cognition". If it were the case, you would not see male IQ distributions as wider than women's.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 02:35 PM
8

Good for him, but you have to admit, he should have done it immediately. He wasted a lot of time and effort on that broad, when it could have been over in a week.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 08:53 PM
6

This guy has the attention of 18 to 20 year old college pussy daily. Then it's his fault for not acting on it. Seriously, if your main woman refuses to put out, barring a medical condition, you go and fuck another woman. If he's not capable of doing it (whether it's because he can't attract hotter women or is morally opposed to the idea) she'll know it and there will be no dread.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 08:14 PM
26

What are you trying to avoid, exactly? A dead bedroom? The only way to avoid that is for the woman you're bedding to have a fear at the back of her head that if she doesn't please you, things are going to go bad for her. The only option left in the west to do that is to display your ability to walk away. That's it. That's why TRP says again and again: don't get married.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 08:00 PM
39

There are no RP women, only women who are aware of the existence of TRP. Ultimately, all women trade a part of themselves for the access to what they want from a man. Your "RP women" want to know how to package what they have (by being feminine and not a pain in the ass) and trade it for the commitment of an alpha. The only difference between them and the rest of the female population is that they are better informed about what quality men want.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 07:55 PM
7

It is a feminist theory. Instead of hurling insults, try to clearly think about what it means for rape to "not be about sex". Imagine someone said "the stock market isn't about money, it's about math". Power play is integral to all sex, someone is going to dominate and someone is going to be dominated. Rape is very much about the imposition of this domination on an unwilling person, but saying it's "not about sex" is ludicrous. It's really a testament to how far mainstream thought has been uncri…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 04:20 PM
2

At what point of our evolution did we acquire the ability to do good or evil, and therefore to rape?
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 02:47 PM
1

A lot of violent rape (as in, the back alley stuff) is about power more than it is about sex I wish the idiocy that is "rape is about power not sex" would at least not show up on this sub. It's feminist theory, put it in the same bucket as affirmative consent and male oppression of women: it is not scientific fact.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 02:45 PM
3

There are treaties that will ensure they can garnish your wages in pretty much any country. It might work if you do it before she initiates the proceedings, if she has trouble finding you, but I'm only speculating, I'm no legal expert. It's just simpler to make sure nothing can attach you to a woman, make her get an abortion before bailing.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 02:07 PM
17

We already have an awful set of laws on the book. The reason nobody reacts is that these laws are applied very sparingly. Blue pill men, even when informed about how easily they can get fucked by the courts will still burry their heads in the sand, thinking "this would never happen to me!"
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 05:23 AM
48

That's not just blue pill, that's full out feminist double-think. You can be gullible enough to believe fatherhood is socially determined, but how can you reconcile that with going after biological fathers for child support? The fact this is the consensus in the field of psychology is one of the many proofs it cannot possibly be categorized as a science.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 05:19 AM
1

I can't argue with anything you said. I may give that idea of low reward a go for 2 weeks. But that would have to start with reddit. If I have addictions, this website has to be the worst one.
/r/askTRP26/05/15 08:21 PM
1

But is indoctrinating your brain to expect a simple and fast dopamine high every Friday actually rewarding or is it the road to addiction? There is a very wide spectrum here. You could make absolutely anything into an addiction. If you work a shitty job, doesn't the 5pm bell on Friday also release dopamine, and aren't you conditioned by it? The question is how harmful it really is. With weed, the main problem seem to be the lethargy and laziness that come after the high, no the high itself (caff…
/r/askTRP26/05/15 06:28 PM
1

Alcohol, for him, was a reward for doing good work. This is well documented. I will share a drink with a buddy after we've done some actual hard work to earn it. How is that different from the toke on a Friday night, after a long week, because you're "earned it"? I agree it can be a dangerous mindset to fall into, and the reward can become disproportionate to the work. We know that's how people stay fat, they run and burn 200 calories, then reward themselves with a chocolate bar that contains 35…
/r/askTRP26/05/15 05:50 PM
5

The irony is that the reasoning behind hate speech laws is that of a slippery slope. Why censor racist speech? Because that may lead to more people saying racist things, which may lead more people to have racist viewpoints, which may lead to animosity and discrimination, which may lead to violence. You need huge leaps from the starting point of speech to get to an actual crime, where actual people get hurt, instead of just feelings. It's also a testament to how comfortable and coddled some peopl…
/r/MGTOW26/05/15 05:27 PM
4

You can truly appreciate something when you lost it. The extension to that is you can truly appreciate the necessity of something if you see some people going without it. The cold war ended, and Americans no longer see examples of developed countries where the lack of free speech is used to silence the population, so they start thinking "surely a bit of restriction can't be bad?". We made sure to keep nazism as a cautionary tale of totalitarianism, but what about communism? How quickly people fo…
/r/MGTOW26/05/15 05:21 PM
12

What bitching? What I see is an uncharacteristically self-aware feminist giving some talking points about the nature of the beast. The conclusion one can come up with is that feminism attracts people who have mental issue, and then exacerbates said mental issues, so it cements people in those beliefs. This conclusion partly explains how feminist has become so widespread, and shines light on the fact that it is an ideology for broken people, by broken people, to produce more broken people. It rem…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 07:30 PM
3

He may be overstating the issue, but it is true that the majority of the immigration come from cultures that have a stronger sense of masculinity, and therefore are a threat to the sexual success of the average western man. If you are the type to care strongly about your genetic and cultural legacy (and it appears more alpha males do, which should surprise no one), then this can be troubling. Imagine for a second a very devout Christian man, he would like his daughter to marry another devout Chr…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 07:20 PM
1

It goes beyond provision. Women want a man who is better than them, in status, in wealth and in skill. If you force an artificial equality, even just by making everyone think that the genders are equal, suddenly an average woman cannot be satisfied with an average man. If you want to create a society where women are happy to pair up with a man at their level, these men must be higher than them socially. This ties in with Maxim #39. Women are attracted by a man who can do things they can't, becau…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 07:01 PM
10

I try to answer whenever I can, and the results vary. One thing I think would help is to have the flair from TRP also show on askTRP. Right now, there's no way for newcomers to distinguish between sound advice given by regulars and from other newbs and trolls, and since they're newcomers they don't even know which users to trust.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 09:49 PM
8

Can you explain? Are people more likely to see feminism as bullshit or the contrary?
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 12:15 AM
1

It doesn't have to, learn to save when employed so you have a cushion to fall back on for at least a few months. The only reasons I can think of to stay at a job you intend on quitting are waiting for some equity to vest, or because you are on a visa tied to your job.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 04:07 PM
13

Keep in mind that it's very likely she was left emotionally broken by the dude she accused. It's just that he didn't break the law, she just happens to be clinically insane. If that's the case, it's better for her to live in a reality where she's a victim of pretty much everybody, instead of one where she is a victim of herself.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 10:02 PM
27

Not sure if that would generate enough revenue. More than likely, she'll end up as a writer for one of the thousand female navel-gazing online publications.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 09:37 PM
0

The law is just a partial substitute. Its goal is to punish and prevent only the most damaging instances of bad behavior. So the law is a consensus of what evil needs to be punished, not entirely what is good and what is evil. Furthermore, not everything that is illegal is evil. Render to Caesar what is Caesar's. And finally, laws change. If what is evil can change, then we come back to a subjective stance of morality.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 12:26 AM
0

I can't speak for the religious, but i've found morality to be completely subjective. Morality has no meaning outside of a religion or a moral ideology. The concept of good and evil have to be given by an external, supreme authority which cannot be proven nor disproven to be false. Good and evil therefore, like God, are axiomatic. Without a "law giver", as you have observed, one is forced to rely on subjective morality: how people "feel" about something. The best that can then be achieved is to …
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 07:57 PM
6

It all depends on your frame and your standing in the relationship. If she's financing that startup dream and you don't want the pond to dry, it would be indeed a good idea to omit the second half. But if you display enough confidence that the business will succeed, and you're coy while saying it, it's a good display of dread game. It tells her she needs to prove her loyalty to be worthy of you.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 04:13 PM
17

It's likely another case of projection, because from where they stand, it doesn't happen. A man won't resent a woman for changing according to his wishes, he's more likely to be thrilled about it. This is also likely to trigger the hamster and make her think she's being abused because she's sacrificing for him.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 04:03 PM
27

If you have your own business, it's doubly important to not get married. If she asks you why, tell her "so that it's easier for you to leave me if it fails, and for me to leave you if it succeeds".
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 02:24 PM
63

What we see here is a collective outrage over the abuse of SJ vocabulary when it is used against people "on their side". The advisor is obviously very impatient, a bad flaw for someone in that profession, but she knows she needs to walk on eggshells around students, who after all are the ones who fuel all these movements. So she attempts to turn the tables and use a SJ, more specifically feminist, tactic: accuse the student of harassment. With no context, she would have won the round, unfortunat…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:52 PM
13

But can he prove it?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:26 AM
13

This goes beyond the pussypass. If you've followed GamerGate, women on the "pro" side got the same threats and attacks online, but it was simply not reported at all, and brushed off as fabrications when brought up. Joss Whedon isn't being told to man up, it's simply that people on the side of the narrative (SJW) can do no wrong. Admitting that they are capable of death threats would make them lose the moral high-ground, and create a flaw in the narrative. What we see is an example of what happen…
/r/PussyPass05/05/15 06:05 PM
3

This approach may work if you're the artsy/bad-boy type. Barring that, realize that women are not interested in a man who makes as much as they do and have a similar professional standing. They want a man who makes more, so don't expect that hardworking professional to be interested in you, she'll likely prefer the lawyer who makes twice her salary.
/r/MGTOW04/05/15 06:12 PM
1

why should she be rejected because of her gender? This is basically the question that started feminism, and everyone went along with it because, on a superficial level, it makes sense. But it hides the other half of the picture, which is is that women are going to be treated differently, in every area of life, just because of their gender. You could say a lot of "should"s, the fact of the matter is that allowing women into the workforce in a "gender-blind" fashion actually gives them an unfair a…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/15 06:02 PM
3

Completely unsurprising. It's not really about Mayweather, it's not about domestic violence, it's about getting clicks and selling ads. Outrage over domestic violence is a low hanging fruit, couple that with the cathartical knocking down a high-profile figure, and you've got a winner. Also, in this thread, why does anyone actually give a fuck if he beat women or not? "Oh, he's not alpha, good alphas like me would never hit a woman! Hurr durr" Seriously guys? This attitude is precisely why these …
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 06:50 PM
4

Realize that a woman would have no second thought about dumping you if she could get a better man. That's just the new social contract, the thing is, the feminine imperative tries to push the idea that if a girl leaves you, "it's just a breakup" and "people drift apart", but when you leave a girl, you've been using her. Don't accept that bullshit. If you feel bad about it, stop thinking about leaving her. It's you and her now, it might be her tomorrow, it might be someone else, you'll get there …
/r/askTRP01/05/15 09:13 PM
1

What an ugly cunt.
/r/PussyPass28/04/15 03:56 AM
3

OP, before getting your panties in a bunch, you read the bloody article you post. This is an article from a site called conservativewoman.co.uk. It was written by a woman named Kathy Gyngell, and is about her critique of Perter Lloyd's book. Her main point is that men, including Lloyd, are wrong to complain, and should just man up and fix society. Now what the fuck did you expect? There is absolutely nothing new under the sun, this is the classic female conservative stance that has been written …
/r/MGTOW23/04/15 04:14 PM
1

Yes, it is Kathy Gyngell, this post is bullshit.
/r/MGTOW23/04/15 04:07 PM
7

I don't know, the style feels like a gigantic plea to "daddy" to put her in her place, which is congruent with the content. I think we're simply dealing with someone who's more fucked in the head than most.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 02:00 PM
19

She looks so happy about it.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:51 PM
29

"he's actually turned out to be pretty... kind and... funny and... smart. And... I'm thinking now... he's made my life infinitely better. Hamster translation: "my son is an average chump and I am so disappointed by him. But he makes an ok accessory to my grandiose life" I think it was Rollo Tomassi who said that the only woman capable of loving a man the way he wants to be loved (i.e. unconditionally) is his mother. I feel sorry for the ones that don't even have that.
/r/MGTOW22/04/15 05:30 PM
6

like /u/dicklord_airplane said, TEDx is to TED what your high school "olympiad" is to the actual Olympic games. You can make quite a bit of money by loaning a brand. I'd caution you to also be very skeptical even with actual TED talks. Some of the panelists are very smart, and certainly very influential, that does not mean their ideas are right. TED models the dynamics of Apple presentations, and its goal is to get you to feel excitement. This is a great way to suspend your critical thinking ski…
/r/MGTOW22/04/15 05:22 PM
2

Again, depends on the financial situation. If she's making $100k, sure. If she's making $35k, and you want a maid, a cook, a secretary, a gardener, it's not going to be worth it. And in OP's situation, she seems to not be able to afford paying off student loans and pay half the rent, so why are we even discussing these hypotheticals?
/r/askTRP22/04/15 01:46 AM
1

Why? If you have a well-paying job, it may be more beneficial for you that "her share" be work around the house rather than paying part of the rent. I know I'd rather spend an hour working at my job than scrubbing the bathtub. Unless you want your woman to do all the housework and have a full time job with which she contributes equally to household expenses. If you can pull it off, all the power to you.
/r/askTRP21/04/15 08:51 PM
5

Then you have to figure out how much your time is worth, and what's a fair split. And also how much the effort she puts in is worth ( microwaved dinner vs. fancy meal, dumping clothes in the washer vs. ironing your shirts).
/r/askTRP21/04/15 04:35 PM
3

If you can't keep your woman in check, that's a separate issue. If someone isn't happy with the arrangement, you can always renegotiate, which can include lowering her chores and increasing her contribution to expenses. It can also be moving her out (or moving out yourself), and have a completely egalitarian split. Ultimately, there are no bad arrangements, just individuals who have more or less self-respect and accept blatantly exploitative situations.
/r/askTRP21/04/15 04:32 PM
3

Nothing wrong with you paying the full rent amount... provided she does all the cooking, cleaning and other chores while you're earning that salary. If she wants the advantages of a homemaker, she better be ready to actually do all the homemaking.
/r/askTRP21/04/15 03:19 PM
5

Does that really matter? Would the organizers give a man the first place to avoid him throwing a tamper tantrum?
/r/PussyPass20/04/15 09:22 PM
4

You don't appreciate how hard it would be to get a (nearly) random woman into the top ten if women on average had less potential Well then, my unimpressive statistical skills must be better than yours, because it actually is not hard to imagine this at all. Imagine two breeds of dogs, breed A has an average running speed of 30 mph, with a standard deviation of 10 mph, breed B has an average speed of 35 mph with a standard deviation of 6 mph. Would you not agree that it is clear breed A is intrin…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:11 PM
1

However, the argument I was making was that because we definitely have empirical evidence of two women who ARE good at chess, we can therefore conclude that, assuming very few fundamental differences between the female and male brains alone, this proves that women CAN be good at chess, and so it must be some separate environmental factor or factors that causes the disparity in women chess players. Everything you said is true, except for the part in bold. Women can be good at chess, with enough p…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:58 PM
39

Because following a claim that "women are better than men at X" with "but men are better than women at Y" is heresy. To make it not sexist, the second part must be dropped.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 06:16 PM
1

I wonder if it's actually possible to upgrade all 8 pawns, supposing your opponent lets you. You would have 2 rows of pieces to get past.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 06:14 PM
5

So, you prefer one anecdote to worldwide statistics? An anecdote that in no way contradicts my claim. I never said education doesn't play a part, I also never said women aren't smart enough for chess. All I said is that the data shows competitive chess skill has a male bias, and given what we know about gender physiological and psychological differences, it is reasonable to conclude that, all else being equal, men will be more likely than women to be really good at chess. And what's the problem …
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:09 PM
5

No, occam's razor says that the proof needs to be that there is something else than intrinsic ability that accounts for differences in scores designed to measure said intrinsic ability. If you start splitting hairs like this, than we should not give a failing grade to students who don't show up to an exam, since clearly "conflating interest in participating and ability to succeed when participating is an error".
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:50 PM
0

Why are you so defensive of the feminist narrative? Women perform worse on average: patriarchal conspiracy! Some female outliers perform great: proof that women are just as good! Statistical outliers do not invalidate a trend, and this is not a sample size issue. You have millions of women playing chess around the world, so limiting the study to just world champions so you can pretend there isn't enough sample is disingenuous. Will you also say that we cannot conclude that europeans are worse at…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:45 PM
1

No, what is claimed here is the equivalent of taking some hypothetical sport S, observing that 98% of people playing it are over 7 feet tall, then claiming that having found 2 players under 7 feet somehow destroys the assumption that there is something inherent in S that makes people over 7 feet tall better at it.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 04:17 PM
2

The population argument doesn't hold. Women constitute 50% of the population, the fact that a smaller number of them play chess at a competitive level is in of itself an indication that they are on average worse at it. This goes back to the standard feminist argument "we need more women in X". There are no barriers, and "social barriers" can easily be overcome if you are interested in the discipline: it's not like there are no women in X, just there are fewer.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 04:11 PM
15

Good for her I guess, but it gives a vibe of an owner saying "I forgave my slave and didn't send him to hang". The law gave the power to fuck someone over, and she instead chose the path of decency, not even out of concern for the guy (remember Briffault's law), but because she was lucid enough to see it wouldn't benefit her and her children.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:51 PM
2

What I heard was that a mother cannot say she relinquishes child support, arrears might be treated differently.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:45 PM
2

Exactly this. OP, your mistake was not to completely drop your interest when she pushed you away, unless you also misread her signals. It's a dance, escalate, when she pushes back, backtrack to make her feel like she's about to lose you. It's worth repeating: you are the prize, if this one doesn't value you, find one who does.
/r/askTRP20/04/15 03:40 PM
1

It's hard to explain, but my past is pretty rough Well there you go. Women can smell a bad boy, even when he's trying to be nice. That's actually their perfect character, the "thug with a heart of gold". Mystery solved.
/r/askTRP18/04/15 10:28 PM
3

But this combination of character traits is a "say what?" to us intuitively because we associate very powerful people being tyrants. That is the key point of the Christian faith. The Hebrew God was a "jealous and angry God" (Deuteronomy 6:15) but the Christian God is all loving and infinitely merciful. The reconciliation between the two is that the Christian God experienced what it is like to be man. but God doesn't exert energy to act like an asshole (as far as we know) because he doesn't have …
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 06:58 PM
3

Indeed, I think all translations convey pretty much the same thing: the father is just happy that his son has come back to him, humility was not a condition for his love. Still, I'd argue it's still not an example we can completely follow. Humility is intricately tied to the concept of mercy. God's mercy is understood to be boundless, whereas that of man is not. It's important to remember that at the time of writing of these texts, the idea that one had to be humble to people who held power over…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 03:37 PM
18

TRP is secular, but it isn't as hostile to Christianity as most of reddit, or western societies in general. Notice Dalrock is the 3rd link on the list, and I'm sure even the most die-hard atheist redpiller can appreciate his wisdom. I think most people who are averse to Christians have either experienced, or constructed in their head, the image of the evangelizing american redneck, and understandably want nothing to do with them. I feel the same towards the atheist evangelist, or the unapologeti…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 04:18 AM
128

A lot of people misunderstand what the parable of the Prodigal Son is supposed to teach. I would go as far as saying it's probably a misunderstanding of it that led to the current state of western society, its culture is mainly based on Christianity after all. The first thing people seem to forget is that the prodigal son came back in humility, he told his father he was no longer worthy of being called his son and asked to be his servant. Do you really think Craig came to that drop-in full of re…
/r/TheRedPill16/04/15 04:45 PM
2

Not quite true. "You" is currently both the 2nd person singular and 2nd person plural pronoun in English. The singular and plural versions used to be different, "thou" was the singular and "you" was the plural. What you are talking about is the formalized second person, which has two forms in romance languages. The one you're referring to is to use the third person for formalities. Spanish uses that form ("usted", 3rd person singular), while in French, the formalization is achieved through plura…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 09:20 PM
1

"Yes" "As opposed to... you?" "I don't take anything seriously" (which shouldn't even be said, your frame should scream that and she wouldn't even be asking the question)
/r/askTRP09/04/15 07:09 PM
1

So do you like going to clubs, and you just have an issue with her going? If you like clubbing, you should go and absolutely not care about what she does. Like others have said, as a "taken" woman, it's her responsibility to fend off guys who want to get in her pants. How well and how strongly she does it will give you an idea of how much she thinks she is "taken". If you like to dance and don't like clubbing, there are many other types of venues you could go. She should want to dance with you. …
/r/askTRP09/04/15 07:06 PM
20

Not to be pedantic, but that's not exactly how evolution works. It's random changes in all directions, then pruning of the paths that don't work. The male mantis doesn't get eaten because "it makes no sense to develop a sense of self-preservation". The praying mantis just randomly developed the instinct to eat the male after sex, and since the genetic legacy was already passed (and the male mantis sticking around provided no advantage to competing strategies), that behavior stayed. A lot of what…
/r/askTRP08/04/15 10:29 PM
1

The car analogy is a popular one, and it certainly holds some truth, but I'm not sure it is entirely adequate. Sex is a big part of life, but it is first and foremost an act between two people, and it involves powerful chemicals responsible for emotional bonding. Each new partner weakens that bond, like a drug that loses potency the more you consume it. Arranged marriages have a very good track record of longevity. This is counterintuitive, one would expect "random matches" to not work so well a…
/r/MGTOW04/04/15 04:46 AM
5

Not exactly. The way it works is that a woman claiming benefits for being a single mother must name the father. Whoever she names is assumed to be the father and the state can then go after him. What I'm suggesting is to reverse that. If a woman wants to claim benefits, she gets taxpayer money, then if the government want to go after a dad, they have to prove he is through paternity testing. It's a subtle change, but it's closer to "innocent until proven guilty".
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 09:52 PM
1

In the comments, he mentions they've been hanging out alone. Still possible OP is orbiting and not telling the truth, but that's on him.
/r/askTRP02/04/15 09:30 PM
1

You're right, there's quite a bit of anger in MGTOW's mix. But the fact you accuse them of beating women, when they in fact swore them off and most are single, shows you aren't thinking straight. And I agree with you that the average man becomes much happier with a good women at his side. But do you know what is a "good woman", what traits she should have? Have you met many of them? Do you feel that there are lots of good women and lots of bad men, and wonder why wickedness has such a strong gen…
/r/MGTOW02/04/15 09:29 PM
3

Staying a virgin until marriage is a respectable choice, but if a woman is going to invoke that to delay/block sex with you, she better go the whole way. If someone is waiting for marriage to do something they (supposedly) have extremely strong urges to do, they better be in a similar hurry to get married. This means making the decision in under a year, a few months of acquaintance are usually enough, and until those church bells ring, the man is not the husband and isn't supposed to pay for any…
/r/MGTOW02/04/15 08:55 PM
1

Dude, I hope it's just your anger and desperation talking, and you're not just trolling. You gotta get out of this mindset, stop for a moment feeling sorry for yourself and others, put all those feelings aside and look at the world objectively. Yes, porn addiction is real, and I'm sure you're in a difficult place, but you're 25 and still have time to fix a lot of things. But relishing in your anger at your perceived injustices in this world is not going to help. Especially since it seems you sti…
/r/MGTOW02/04/15 08:41 PM
2

If the girl is in a happy relationship, wtf is she doing flirting alone with OP? Unless she's setting him up for a cock fight, this is just a shit test like any other, maybe just a bit stronger because she's ready to branch swing. The fact the girl invoked the boyfriend excuse means she's fully aware that OP is trying to get in her pants. If she wasn't interested, she would have mentioned the bf and then got the hell out immediately.
/r/askTRP02/04/15 08:30 PM
1

I think you're missing the point. He might be at a martial arts tournament, the important part is that she is there, flirting with men behind his back. The only thing to check for is her responsiveness, and to figure out if she really wants to branch swing or is trying to set you up for a fight to relish in the drama.
/r/askTRP02/04/15 08:14 PM
28

Forcing insurers to cover paternity testing saves no money for the healthcare system I think you just discovered an excellent solution then. Reverse the default, make the man not responsible for paying child support until it's proven he is the father. If no man is proven to be the father in this fashion, push child support onto the tax payer. Then observe as the government forces insurers to cover routine paternity tests within a year of this change.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 08:07 PM
16

You're right, he isn't trying to justify female pedophilia, because in his mind, these women are not pedophiles. He was trying to find a way to reduce her guilt by partly blaming the media, and saying that it's different when women do it because it's an emotional thing (i.e. trying to equate it to love) whereas for men, it's just dirty old perverts. Sending a love letter to a child is wrong but molesting the child is worse so as she hasn't acted on her impulse to kidnap and molest the kid, it is…
/r/PussyPass30/03/15 08:29 PM
6

Same reason you look at the mileage on your car. Some people want a brand new one, some people are ok with one that's been on a couple of drives, some prefer one that's already been on a few road trips, at least you know she won't break down. But I'm sure every one of them wants to be told the truth and pay for exactly what they get.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 08:08 PM
1

Good points. I guess the next step in the argument involves moving away from the perspective of advantages and responsibilities, and go for the pathos. If it isn't regulated, then discrimination will happen because some people are dicks, and the result is segments of the population being unfairly disadvantaged. Since these people pay taxes like everyone else, are citizens like everyone else, they should get the same protections, so the government has to step in and regulate. For the record, I th…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 06:49 PM
2

This is the really one of the main points in the debate over free market and self-regulation, and I'm tempted to try to advocate for the other side as an exercise, although my personal views tend to be in line with those you just expressed. The usual counterpoint is that the employer wasn't the only one that created the job, the whole of society helped because of subsidies, infrastructures and other "common goods" funded by taxpayers. So since it was granted by government regulations, the govern…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 02:25 AM
11

Employment discrimination against a gender is enshrined in law, under the name "affirmative action". So even if she was discriminated against, who the fuck cares?
/r/TheRedPill27/03/15 11:23 PM
0

Atheism should never have been a movement in the first place. Atheists usually get angry when people say they have a faith, and so are like any other religion. Making a movement out of the belief that there absolutely is no room for a god is not the best way to prove these people wrong. But that's what it has become. Dawkins and DeGrasse Tyson are the prophets and evangelists of a faith-based brand of atheism. How many among their followers really do understand the science they proclaim, and how…
/r/TheRedPill26/03/15 01:11 AM
6

And for the "why" to the above: Never trust someone who has betrayed someone else's confidence, even for your sake. There's probably a dozen stories in each culture's mythology about a repeated pattern of betrayal. Do not put yourself in the "two guys fighting over a girl" position. That's basically giving her your balls on a plate. Don't facilitate branch swinging. Women do it because they usually have no risk of ending up alone. If there are going to be suckers, make sure you're not one of the…
/r/askTRP25/03/15 11:06 PM
11

Did anyone really think it could end any other way?
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 08:32 PM
1

Yup, you got it. Two things though: but then when people realize that you can gain power by acting the victim, they start to abuse the shit of out of those good intentions, and you end up with modern day feminism. That is true with cultural marxism, but I think the more general lesson is that no matter how you organize society, someone will have the power and someone will not (under communism, "everybody was equal", except the First Secretary of the Party was at the top, under him were the Sovie…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 03:29 PM
1

I agree with you, but my experience of the average atheist is that they blame religion for all the world's ills. Obscurantism is caused by religion, wars are caused by religion, social inequity is caused by religion... and of course, if SCIENCE was the law of the land, everything would be fixed and we'd live in paradise. I think having a majority of a society believing in one common religion is good for that society, provided said religion preaches rules that stabilize said society. And for that…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 02:01 PM
1

Sure. Marxism is an economic ideology that attempts to explain everything through the lens of class struggle, i.e. oppression of the poor by the rich. Why is the working class poor? Because they're being oppressed by the capitalists. How did they get there? Unfair separation of society by class. What's the solution? A government run by the working class, for the working class, to level the privilege of the capitalists, or preferably, and abolition of private property altogether. Cultural marxism…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 01:52 PM
4

I might get flak for saying this, but I believe the secularization of western societies has something to do with this. Like it or not, the truth is that the average person needs something to believe in and a community of likeminded believers. If you remove it from them, they will attach themselves to the first substitute they find. Feminism and cultural marxism feed off of young minds looking for this faith that anchors them. When they end up here, their beliefs are once again shattered and so t…
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 08:06 PM
1

It's not a shit test, rather it's women in your life criticizing you for not "getting it" earlier. It's crucial you understand that women really do want you to "get it" (and that includes female relatives), but since "getting it" involves being confident and understanding this at a subconscious level (that's what "being alpha" is), they cannot tell you about it. But yeah, stop caring about what your mother and sister think of you, do your own thing and get laid. That's all the feedback you'll ne…
/r/askTRP23/03/15 08:19 PM
8

Heterosexual women are completely repulsed by men who had sex with another man, even a one-time, experimentation-type thing that he didn't enjoy and regretted later. It's an even bigger deal for them than their notch count is for us. But if you consider it pretty vanilla, and aren't afraid your wife would divorce you, why not tell her? Like others have mentioned above, why the need to conceal it if it's "not a big deal"?
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 05:36 PM
8

Shrugging it off is good, you can also continue her sentence by saying "says she to the man who dutifully provided for his wife for X years". Women unfortunately need to be reminded that all this free shit that comes their way had to be produced on someone's sweat.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 08:32 PM
7

Yes, he's beta, yes, he doesn't quite get it. But it's not really surprising. In a sense, it shows the apex fallacy isn't limited to women: the only guys he sees competing with him are the players, the ones who have settled down with a girl or who can't get laid aren't in his field of view. I would say that the path to MGTOW doesn't matter, but in his case, there's a definite chance that within the next decade, some aging spinster will know how to play the cards just right, convince him they are…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 08:16 PM
5

Is the message here that we should only disclose evidence of scientific studies that cater to the politically correct standards of our time? Yes. If you spend any time in atheist circles, you will no doubt hear how religious obscurantism is the cause of all of mankind's problems, but in particular how it delayed our scientific progress. I'm pretty sure the great thinker of the Renaissance blamed paganism, and the Soviets capitalists for the same reasons. We can't escape it. Each society, at each…
/r/MGTOW20/03/15 06:22 PM
7

Why did you stop? You should have continued. If a woman does not want to be a parent, she should be allowed to choose an abortion to If a man does not want to be a parent, he should be allowed to choose an abortion Oh wait, suddenly they don't have the same choices and responsibilities!
/r/askTRP19/03/15 09:07 PM
-2

You're reading too much into it, it's a hypothetical which means all parameters can be tweaked to satisfy whatever details you think are necessary. My larger point is about the nature of responsibility. A large portion of TRP is about learning proper personal responsibility. We agree that it is our responsibility to improve ourselves in order to succeed with women and life in general. We also agree it is not our responsibility to save single mothers from themselves. My analogy was an attempt to …
/r/askTRP19/03/15 09:04 PM
1

I agree with the second, that again makes sense if you want to be a parent. I'd still be careful because it has the potential to make you think with your emotions, and that's how suckers are born. I'm not so sure about the first. It probably depends on the jurisdiction. From what I gather, in the US you can contest being designated as the father on the birth certificate, whether you are paying support or not should not matter.
/r/askTRP19/03/15 08:44 PM
1

At least if you know then you can go to the courts and demand and official test if it comes back as not your baby. My point is that it doesn't buy you much. If it is possible, why not go through the official channels first? If it isn't, going through the side one won't help, and may harm you. There may be an argument to be had if you are on the fence about becoming a father, and that letting her know you want a test would breech her trust and make parenting difficult, but would you really want t…
/r/askTRP19/03/15 08:23 PM
-3

Wow. Just wow. You should go back to tumblr, you seem to have their epistolary style. I didn't equate anything, I gave an analogy, which I hoped would allow you to break from your emotional state and understand the concept of responsibility. Too bad it didn't work, I'm sorry you have such a masochistic view of your masculinity.
/r/askTRP19/03/15 08:20 PM
3

I'm curious, let's say you travelled to a country which still practiced slavery. Some people there would be responsible for tending to the land, but had absolutely no authority over it. Imagine one of these slaves came to you, and confessed that he had fucked up, he did not pull all the weeds like he was supposed to, and now they have taken over the soil and killed the vegetables. His master will give him 100 lashes as a punishment when he finds out. Now do you tell this person to man up and fac…
/r/askTRP19/03/15 07:15 PM
0

Thing is, it doesn't really help you if the country requires consent of the mother. He gets the test back, it's his, nothing changes. If it's not his, he still is liable for child support because the test was not ordered by a court. Worse, if they find out they can fine and even jail you for having done the test yourself.
/r/askTRP19/03/15 07:02 PM
4

Her body, her choice, her responsibility. If she didn't want the baby, she should have used protection or insisted on him using it. If she did want the baby, she's trying to trap him into paternity. Doesn't mean OP wasn't being reckless.
/r/askTRP19/03/15 06:55 PM
15

Top comment is spot on: I do these things everyday, and don't pay $1000 to do them, its called parenting. This is ridiculous. You want to get in touch with your inner child? Have one! Spend time with the kid painting, sculpting and crafting, and watch how you're contributing to the formation of the future of your species. But since society is trying very hard to turn both men and women into unfit parents, on top of minimizing personal responsibility, can we honestly be surprised here?
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 05:18 PM
1

I am looking at it from the female point of view. Advice differs greatly by gender, you should know that. The best advice for men is to avoid marriage, work on themselves and spin plates. But some of them do want to have a family and will marry, but they will be demanding. The best advice for women is to find such a man, and reel him in with being a young, feminine virgin, ready to marry and categorically rejecting divorce. The call to avoid marriage is like saying "go into STEM, you'll have the…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 10:43 PM
7

Do you have a statistic for "most"? Dalrock has been analyzing marriage and divorce statistics for a while, and he drew some interesting conclusions. What we know is that women are more likely to divorce when: they have more sexual partners they are less religious they marry early they have more education they have a lower IQ You'll notice that some of these seem to contradict one another. Women with higher IQs are more likely to have higher education, and women who are more religious tend to ma…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 06:39 PM
17

Why wait until 26 to get married? From a woman's perspective, if you want to wait until marriage to have sex, you should be looking for a husband as early as possible, and potentially get married between 18 and 20. That was the standard until very recently, then the whole idea that you need to "find yourself" and "find the one" seeped in and women started pushing marriage later while simultaneously starting sex earlier. We know "the one" doesn't exist, just find a guy who has a good upbringing, …
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 05:00 PM
1

I don't know about other states, but I once read the formulation in the California criminal code, and it's brilliant in its perversity. Basically, the fetus is still not a human life, but the crime of homicide is defined as ending a human life or terminating a fetus without the consent of the mother.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 08:50 PM
20

Only when it benefits the narrative. A fetus has the same legal protections against murder when it's not terminated by the woman.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 07:26 PM
40

murder charges against Wilbanks will be dropped because prosecutors cannot prove she was not acting in self-defense. What? I thought self-defense is an active defense, i.e. that if you want to use that to get off, the burden of proof falls on you.
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 05:23 PM
1

All the answers are pretty good, but if you are looking for the answer to give her, it's "you are right, you should go ahead and marry Bobby the super shy guy who's never had sex".
/r/askTRP12/03/15 03:34 AM
6

No, we mean the opposite. If find the proposition of a parent being by law to see their child undergo an unwanted medical procedure to be very distasteful. It's a matter of consistency for me. I am absolutely against forcing any medical treatment on people, it is simply too easy to abuse. What is agreed upon by the medical community is not necessarily correct, chemical castration was once a recognized treatment for homosexuality. When the person cannot consent, and the parents are in disagreemen…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:24 PM
3

I completely agree, that's why I wrote "warranted" instead of "necessary".
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:37 PM
14

I'm not a doctor, I'm just stating what other journalists have reported. http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/03/judge-to-jail-mother-unless-she-signs-consent-for-sons-circumcision/ The circumcision in this case is not being done for religious reasons, interestingly enough. The boys father said that the decision was made after the boy was having certain urinary problems, a condition which a pediatrician diagnosed as phimosis. This condition prevents the retraction of the foreskin. The result was t…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:25 PM
1

Additionally, it seems the kid is suffering from phimosis, which would put the circumcision in the tiny bucket of medically warranted. Still, unless the child's life is immediately in danger, I'll always defend the right of the parents to be the ultimate decision makers when it comes to their children's health. And in cases when there's a disagreement between doing something and not doing anything, the "not doing" should prevail.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:31 PM
2

It's like asking a woman if she'd end a relationship if she suggested anal to her bf but he said "I want to have sex, just not that type". First, it shows a reversal of gendered expectations. Couples are happier when the man is more sexual and the woman is more committed. Second, it's a blow to the ego of the person making the request. They put themselves in a vulnerable position out of love, and it's not valued as much as they would want it to be. So yes, the relationship should end, but not be…
/r/askTRP10/03/15 04:01 PM
2

make it clear beforehand that this is a one time deal (even if it isn't) Absolutely, and be very careful. Be careful about not getting attached (which you show signs of) and be careful about her not getting attached. She's 29, her clock is ticking, she needs a stable man and she has sniffed a provider in you. This makes her that much more likely to go crazy when things don't turn out the way she intended. For future reference, if you start wanting out, use omega anti-game (i.e. do the exact oppo…
/r/askTRP10/03/15 03:47 PM
6

she's trying to be a good committed girlfriend, and here I am, taking advantage of her biology and potentially making her do things that she doesn't (in her logical mind) want to do Bro, you are projecting your own personality onto women. Their thinking does not work like men's, and it is more often than not, absolutely not logical. The reason you believe that she doesn't want to cheat on her boyfriend is because you make her telling you about him some sort of reluctance. If she was really such …
/r/askTRP10/03/15 02:39 PM
3

It doesn't target red pill men, but /r/redpillwomen is probably the place where you'll get the best answers. There's a saying we use often, you don't ask the deer how to hunt. This is particularly true for men, women are often incapable of identifying what really makes them tick. But beyond that, what makes romance and relationships attractive is all the subtext, the non-verbal stuff, the illusion of effortlessness on both parts, and for that, it's best to ask people of your gender. Chances are,…
/r/askTRP10/03/15 12:56 AM
9

Which is why there needs to be political pressure to remove benefits for the elderly, and (RP) men should. The last two generations of voters have royally fucked most western countries, they can't expect to just get a comfortable retirement now while the younger generation of men toils away to fund it. You'll ask "but what about my folks, they weren't all bad?". Well yes, they weren't all bad, they raised you and you should repay them by taking care of them in their old age.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 08:39 PM
61

If you do nothing, you're helping him but if you do something, you're helping her Well, since the government is already disproportionately helping her, I guess I'll go ahead and help him then.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:44 PM
2

You're welcome. It takes time to develop this sense, but you'll get it. You have to be absolutely heartless, otherwise they will be. No meeting them halfway, no affection until they are begging to spend time with you.
/r/askTRP07/03/15 03:54 AM
3

Yeah, she dumped you. "We should take a break" is chick talk. Think about it, it means no sex for the foreseeable future, with a possibility of a backup relationship. It's almost worse than the friendzone. A masculine frame is a frame of intent and decisiveness. The moment she started getting flaky, you should have nexted her right away. Something like "I see you're making excuses, but I'll be frank: I have no interest in someone like that. Goodbye." and then nothing. Just the fact that you hope…
/r/askTRP07/03/15 03:20 AM
1

he wanted me to fuck other guys and tell him they were better So, cuckold fetish? he fucked a girl ten years younger... She'd be a pre teen. The picture is getting sharper. Thanks for that info. And yes, he has to be a perfect 10 as far as I'm concerned. [...] I could try to say I work to look good, too, but I don't, just lucky. Welcome to the realities of SMV (Sexual Market Value). Women peak early with little effort, since their beauty is mostly innate. Men's attractiveness is almost always th…
/r/askTRP05/03/15 11:30 PM
1

The thing is, it isn't really unattractive. I want enthusiasm. I want unrestrained sexual passion. I don't want a man who holds back in that sense. Just legitimate non-interest in making me his girlfriend. That's what's unattractive. The fact he's more emotionally attached to you than you to him. Of course you want the passion, the enthusiasm, the boldness. A woman wants a man who could have any other woman, but is choosing to spend his valuable time with her. if he looks the way I like I see yo…
/r/askTRP05/03/15 10:29 PM
3

I don't play games and I really don't like it when men do. My experience is that the more people say they "don't play games", the more they actually do. You're probably not doing it consciously, but let me tell you, you are most definitely playing games. Here's a an example. You say you're in an open marriage. What is that supposed to be, exactly? To me, it sounds like an open contract, or an optional oath. If the idea is that both of you can pursue sex with other people, but aren't allowed to d…
/r/askTRP05/03/15 09:50 PM
16

Any area where there is enough homelessness. Since the vast majority of the homeless are men, she is correct in calling this a male problem. Yet another way dirty male hobos are oppressing upper middle class ladies like her.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 08:57 PM
3

I think the point was to show that the idea that women's accusation of rape were never taken seriously until the feminists came to save the day is bullshit. Also that women crying rape because they didn't get what they wanted is also nothing new.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:57 PM
17

Do you think we'd be better off if they were not allowed to vote? If you think about it for a bit, this is the wrong question to ask. OP's proposition was that "women needed to be able to vote". We don't know what would have happened if they didn't get the vote and all else stayed the same, how our technological progress, trends and fashions would have shaped politics then. It's foolish to speculate, even more so to qualify as "better" or "worse". No, the real question was, was there really a ne…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 11:06 PM
2

Quebec is not all fine and dandy either, and the public system is getting shittier with every revision they bring. That being said, private schools are partly subsidized, especially francophone ones, so if you ever do have kids, that is really the best option.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 02:57 PM
4

Yeah, it "balances out in the end". But isn't it sad that it has to, that everyone has to have their shitty period in life? It didn't need to turn that way, everything was going relatively fine, then women asked for feminism and men gave it to them. It's self-engineered misery.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 05:36 PM
3

When it comes to sex, everyone always says they prefer honesty. Ask yourself why it even needs to be stated, who would actually prefer mind tricks and games. The reality is that everyone does, both men and women. Women love the emotional roller coaster of being with a guy who gives them measured attention. They need provision, but they want the drama. Similarly, men love the feeling of being the superhero of a girl's life, so they'll delude themselves into thinking their woman is incapable of le…
/r/askTRP20/02/15 04:31 PM
1

If you had taken the red pill, you should have realized that all women trade their sexuality for a man's power. Prostitution is simply a direct and unambiguous form of the exchange.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 03:19 PM
5

Why would you ask someone to marry you if you were not guaranteed she would say yes? This is a critical question, and reveals a lot about expectations, traditions, and how much marriage has changed. A man sleeping and living with a woman has absolutely no reason to ask her to marry him if she may say no, since a no would just confuse the current state of affairs. But if a yes is a necessary condition to ask the question, there is no point in asking in the first place. Marriage proposals are a re…
/r/askTRP19/02/15 02:29 AM
1

If your woman is not one bit concerned about looking good for you, she isn't any good.
/r/askTRP17/02/15 09:38 PM
2

In other words, a couple where the guy is more concerned about his appearance than his girl works about as well as a couple where the girl is dominating the relationship.
/r/askTRP12/02/15 06:05 PM
4

To be fair, there is a tiny chance that this a girl who get some advice from a male to write about sexual stuff, and who really is enamored with OP. That doesn't change the fact OP should ignore it, because if it is indeed a girl, she is very low value. A pretty girl, no matter how shy, would never need to do this. Women approaching men does not work.
/r/askTRP12/02/15 04:34 PM
1

When you say "people don't believe me", are you talking about private individuals, or authorities to which you reported the crime? If you don't remember the people's names, chances are cops want to believe you, but you don't have anything to help them on. Unfortunately, without that, they will escape punishment, and there's nothing else that can be done. Is it a shitty situation? Yes. But that's the nature of things. If I gave cash to a scammer and didn't have their name or a description of what…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:20 PM
1

At this point, it's no longer provider game but sugar daddy game. AKA prostitution.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 06:47 PM
20

they have a right to feel safe I've come to the conclusion the best thing to happen to the West is a wave of communist governments. Then people like you will really understand how this "right to feel safe" works.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:28 PM
7

The reason OP's and your strategy work is because they play into a very specific female fantasy: reforming the rough guy with a golden heart. There is no such thing as provider game, because women expect provision, they're not actively looking for it. It's like a woman who professes she's a great cook. If she's hot, it's bonus points, but that's not enough to get a guy interested, even if home cooked meals are probably the most valuable benefit of an LTR.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 02:22 PM
7

Guys give tests, but they're not shit tests, at least they work very differently. A woman issuing a shit test will do so completely involuntarily, and the way to pass the test is though either ridicule or scorn. I can't think of anything that has both components in men's behavior. You can test a slut by pretending to love women "with experience" to see how she reacts, but that would be intentional. On the other hand, everything a guy might involuntarily test a girl on, he'll expect a straight an…
/r/askTRP11/02/15 12:57 AM
7

Isn't it funny how when men pass up the career women, they are going for "dumb women", but you can't suggest that women passing up the nerdy guys and preferring a meathead is them going for "dumb men"? Focusing on one's "career" is not intelligence, getting good grades in a social science major is not intelligence. Intelligence is adaptability to different situations that leads to success. By that definition, all these women incapable of finding a partner are the dumb ones.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/15 05:41 PM
1

I'm glad we both agree you are misinformed. You know what to do, read the sidebar.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:47 PM
1

You can believe whatever you want, doesn't change the fact that all of feminist theory relies on marxist principles. I could believe that neonazism can be a progressive movement and point you to this one skinhead who smokes pot, it wouldn't make me any less wrong.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 06:39 PM
6

This particular case is a left vs. right issue because "violence against women" is the left's equivalent of the right's "gay agenda". This doesn't mean all the right is perfect and all the left is awful, we know very well neither political side cares about men. Don't take a criticism of your party of choice in this one instance as a personal attack, it won't do any good.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:18 PM
1

You seem to be confusing the pushing of policies that are detrimental to men with feminism. Both conservative and liberals can assume women can do no harm, both conservative and liberals can joyfully fuck men over in family law, but feminism is a squarely left-wing ideology.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:13 PM
3

An alpha male doesn't sacrifice his life to fight a war that is not his to fight, under impossible odds. He leads by example, and only cares about himself and his own. And realize the guy is in high school, he's not a man yet, you're basically admonishing him to "man up" and fight your own battle. You've gotten to the main point of contention between the MRM and TRP. The former is concerned with social change, the latter with optimizing one's situation in life. What the MRM is doing is noble, se…
/r/askTRP03/02/15 05:40 PM
3

No, that's not the lesson at all. You can fight about this stuff all you want as the parent of the kid being forced fed this crap. As a private citizen, you can get on school boards and oppose these practices. If you happen to be a teacher, you can speak up. Like I said, the difference between us and the soviets is that adults are not threatened with violence for opposing the dominant narrative, so there is room to fight there. But there is nothing a high school kid can do to change his teacher'…
/r/askTRP03/02/15 05:16 PM
2

A topic such as this one is the equivalent of asking school kids in 1970s USSR to write an essay on whether God exists. Its goal is only to identify crimethink and rectify it as early as possible. Think I'm being extreme and the comparison is unfair? Read the principles behind Common Core, you'll see they're absolutely not ashamed to admit that making sure all kids come out not only strongly believing in racial and gender equality, but also that they become "agents of change" and push these idea…
/r/askTRP03/02/15 04:47 PM
11

Quote is from Warren Farell IIRC.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 11:01 AM
12

Agree with everyone else said, but... Why would anyone get back together after breaking up? Call me crazy, but it's the one thing I don't understand and I would never have done even in my blue pill days. Breaking up and then getting back together with a person means one thing and one thing only, which is what you just described: the person asking for the breakup tried to do better, then realized they couldn't. If a girl breaks up with you then tries to reconnect, she is settling for you, and you…
/r/askTRP29/01/15 10:09 PM
5

It is in the article, it's just passed through the hamsterlator to make men seem inferior and please the female audience: .2. Self-definition. Men are more likely to define themselves by their careers – What do I do? How much do I earn? What kind of car do I drive? How big is my TV? This is unfortunate and short-sighted because nobody dies thinking that he wishes he had a 72” Sony instead of a 64” Vizio. But hey, that’s men. Women, who are, in general, more emotional and intuitive, are more like…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 09:42 PM
10

I don't think so. Seeing as the site "specializes in helping smart, strong, successful women", it's likely this woman has a good career and is used to see really high status and high quality men. She likely fucked a dozen when she was young and pretty, so she cannot imagine settling for anything but such a man. That's what the author meant when he said "my clients can only date .0001% of men". No woman would prefer having a beta provider and an alpha lover over the commitment of one alpha provid…
/r/MGTOW29/01/15 07:10 PM
5

The only proper answer to that question is another question, namely: Why don't women hate not getting laid as much as men do? I suspect a female audience would have no problem answering that one.
/r/MGTOW29/01/15 06:13 PM
17

Blame the sexual revolution. Women still don't understand that a man who will fuck them will not necessarily commit to them. This whole post uses that faulty assumption. The woman asking the question basically thinks "I've had sex with him, why won't he commit to me?". At no point does she consider that she should've picked the guy who would commit to her, then had sex with him.
/r/MGTOW29/01/15 06:10 PM
6

I suspect him to be one of the few alphas for which "things just work" Doubtful, he said it himself "As a guy who was single for 35 years". It's simply that after a while, the market shifted in his favor, and none the wiser, he thought he "figured it out". His "about me" page seems to corroborate that: Unfortunately, I had to make fifteen years of dating mistakes before I finally figured out how to have a happy relationship. Thing is, he didn't discover red pill principles or game, he just start…
/r/MGTOW29/01/15 06:05 PM
2

But still, who gives a fuck about her ex. OP does, and he needs to get out of that frame of mind. There's only two solutions: either he starts believing that he's the best thing that happened to her, or he accepts that she settled for him, still pines for her old lover, and he needs to get the fuck out.
/r/askTRP29/01/15 05:36 PM
3

If your wife lied to you or otherwise misrepresented her past before you got married, it's the equivalent of you cheating on her and you have a right to be displeased. She should qualify herself to you, not the other way around. Don't think about how she may have had better dick, hold a frame that makes it clear that if she indeed had better, and is ever so slightly comparing you unfavorably to it, you walk away.
/r/askTRP29/01/15 04:00 PM
5

The feminization of men is a big part of the picture, technological progress is another. Half a century ago, the average man was still masculine, therefore sexy, and able to provide in some capacity. You could build a relationship based on sex (and provision) because people fucked early, had kids, then the man spent 12 hours at work while the woman would be equally busy at home. They would really only interact with each other at the dinner table and in bed. If he made enough money and she could …
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 01:26 AM
2

You're correct, I call them straight or normal. When you have a property that is shared by the majority of samples, you're in most cases not going to make up a label for it. How do you call people who have 5 fingers on each hand? I call them normal too. Is it demeaning to polydactyls? What do you call people who aren't attracted to pre-pubescent children? You guessed it, normal, which means similar in trait to the vast majority of the population.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 11:40 PM
1

And cis, or cisgender, just bugs the fuck out of me on principle. A made-up word to use as a condescending slur for something we already have a word, heterosexual, to describe. Cisgender and heterosexual are not the same thing. Cisgender means you are the gender you're supposed to have, i.e. you're not trans. But you're right, we already had a perfectly good word to describe that: normal.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 07:32 PM
48

Have you considered she posted this to have people validate her and tell her to cheat/break up so her conscience can be alleviated?
/r/TheRedPill23/01/15 04:11 PM
9

I'm ok with the idea of having all the responsibility of in exchange I have all the authority and power. But these are not patriarchal marriages anymore. And sex is part of the marriage contract, just like provision. If you remove that, there's no point in marrying whatsoever.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/15 04:00 PM
3

...in which we find that /u/omg_cats gets a sexual release when hitting toddlers with his car
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 05:19 PM
1

A man spreading his legs on a bus will never take as much space as your average fat woman.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:49 PM
23

Yeah, but it's a woman, and she's in green, because she's doing the right thing. That's the usual tactic with women and children, show them the good behavior, imply they're already doing it and say "yes, you're a good girl".
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:47 PM
1

I'm not familiar with the model in the Orthodox Church. Does this mean that the choice is between getting married and optionally getting promoted to higher ranks down the line? I only know that there are some very good reasons to require priests to be celibate, and I personally think removing the requirement would be detrimental overall. Now, to your question. At the risk of sounding completely unrealistic, I would like the next pope to tackle the problem of divorce, with the kind of language an…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 11:24 PM
1

Why would abolishing celibacy be a requirement? You seriously think that allowing priests to marry is what is going to fix the shortage of priests and save the institution? Look at what's happening with Protestant churches, they're even more feminized, and the reason is obvious when you hear all the pastors saying how great it is when they submit to their wives. It is a return to tradition and orthodoxy that would help the Catholic Church, but its leadership seems to go exactly in the opposite d…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 08:18 PM
3

Your issue is the frame from which you wrote your story. I think the situation looks more like this: I've been hooking up with a girl for 3 months, and recently, she decided to travel to Mexico, alone, to visit a friend I knew very little about. Turns out the friend is a whore and a cokehead, and my girl isn't having the fun she thought she would. She just called me in desperation, asked me to help her get out of this mess. Read this story as if it was someone else's and ask yourself what advice…
/r/askTRP19/01/15 07:49 PM
7

Talk to other girls(I'm not saying cheat) If her ex is still "an important person in [her] life", OP should end all obligations of exclusivity. It's not cheating if he tells her, right?
/r/askTRP19/01/15 07:27 PM
3

It is, but he won't be able to if he is intentionally kicked out of their kids' life. What a man does have power over is who he chooses to marry and have kids with.
/r/MGTOW19/01/15 07:21 PM
4

You can probably find this info on any anticircumcision website. I'm just saying what I remember. The study in question was performed with a group that was circumcised, then educated about safe sex, and a control group that was simply tested after the period. It didn't control for the fact the control group was not taught about safe sex methods, or the fact that the circumcised group was not likely to have sex for a few weeks after the surgery.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:35 AM
26

I don't know about the CDC, but the American Pediatrics Association based their most recent conclusion on a body of work that is just a bunch of cross-referencing medical articles that ultimately lead to a single study done in sub-saharan Africa somewhere around the 90s. Unless the CDC has itself conducted a more recent study, I'd guess they're just referencing the APA's decision.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:31 PM
11

I'm sorry you don't have access to soap and a shower on a daily basis. I just hope at least you circumcision was done under sanitary conditions.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:27 PM
2

Getting annoyed is for betas No, getting emotional, angry or sad is for betas. Alphas get annoyed all the time. A dad gets annoyed when his child keeps throwing tamper tantrums for no good reason. OP, you need to treat this as a childish move, and both girls, especially the LTR, as a 7 year old. Remember you are not in the wrong, they are, and let your LTR know you're very disappointed by her reaction and this is making you reconsider your relationship with her. You want to be with a reasonable …
/r/askTRP15/01/15 06:23 PM
3

It's not even "LTR recycling", it's just the standard serial monogamy that is the model for modern inter-gender relationships, only with you at the helm instead of playing a support character. As long as she does what you expect of her (cooking, bj's, otherwise making your life more pleasant), stay, but don't get married. If she starts slipping, soft next, then get a new one. And nobody can criticize this model because it's exactly what most women end up doing.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 05:46 PM
1

You're right, better to be the ethical guy and open up about your intentions, so you don't get laid at all. And don't forget, women who pursue AF/BB aren't unethical because "they're not doing it intentionally", right?
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 05:39 PM
1

I thought there were no more "at fault" divorces, everything is "no fault" unless you feign abuse to get custody of the kids.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 01:18 AM
3

You cannot ask someone to dominate you. The best you can do is let them, non-verbally express that you're ok with it. But you cannot ask for it, otherwise it ceases to be domination. The best you can do is advise the girl to extremely submissive, and hope that boosts his confidence, but with men being taught to "respect women" left and right, that has little chance of happening without some intervention on the guy.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 11:48 PM
3

A soft next is difficult to pull off, but not impossible. What you need to do is make her understand she is about to lose her meal ticket. This means separating finances (if not already separate), cut emotional support and start to look elsewhere for sex. More extreme measures include taking time off at work and going on a vacation without her, start cheating and be obvious about it. Finally, the nuclear extreme is completely quitting your job and relying on her income. But of course, all of thi…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 10:53 PM
1

Male triggers are based on fertility Not exactly true. Evolution is not goal based, it just prunes sub-optimal possibilities. Men are generally attracted to larger breasts because the men who were attracted to smaller breasts tended to leave fewer offspring. Same for men attracted to older women. So it's not so much that male triggers are based on fertility, they are based on visual characteristics which correlated with the likelihood of the mother producing more healthy kids.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 10:38 PM
30

I don't. They supported feminism, and they got exactly what they wanted. It used to be that the majority of men had a confidence level (male pride) above that of women, so the average woman had the ability to feel attracted to Mr. Nice Goodprovider. Then they decided that men need constant shaming from a young age, and girls need the moxie, and now they can only get an orgasm from a guy who doesn't care about them and is only using them for sex. Tough luck, but that's the social changes working …
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 09:27 PM
20

And the piece by Marcotte is in furthering this strategy: "How dare you imply that you had it hard? You were supposed to follow this path, and you should be thankful that some women decided to finally be with you!" More mockery, more attacks, to make sure he goes back to being the useful beta. Because each man awakening is another dent in the rickety foundation of feminism.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 09:18 PM
2

Like the others said, either she has had some severe trauma, or this is a way for her to get what she wants. Both qualify as crazy. The longer you stay with her, the more damage she can do to you when you finally can't take it anymore.
/r/askTRP09/01/15 04:10 PM
1

So she's ok with weighing her share of expenses bases on your respective incomes, but not the share of work at home based on your respective free time? How very equal of her! What BrunoOh said. If you feel like she's still salvageable, tell her you feel exploited and taken advantage of, and that you're ready to break things off unless she shows independence and industriousness by getting her own place. If not, sorry, the sex she provides could be gotten for cheaper, and the "intellectual convers…
/r/askTRP08/01/15 09:52 PM
2

This is where it is relatively straightforward (if more difficult to execute) for men but quite sensitive for women. Men want two things from women: sex and femininity. Pump&dump happens when the guy sees he won't get any of the latter, so he'll play the game, get the former, and leave. That's what I'm assuming you're trying to avoid. For him to stick around, you'll have to seduce him with some genuine (and lasting) femininity. This means more smiles, politeness, eagerness to follow and less com…
/r/askTRP08/01/15 09:40 PM
12

Consider this: the feminist position is that, besides "plumbing", men and women are the same. The supposition is that genetic variability "stopped" at the physical and never touched the psychological. Why? Because the ideology says so, so we must make the data for the theory. The racial equality stance is basically the same: isolated population evolved traits independently, but those traits could not possibly go beyond skin color and facial features. Why? Again, because saying otherwise is racis…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 03:36 AM
8

See what you did? On the topic of sexism, you said "a man and a woman are not equal", with no implication of inferiority or superiority. Why can't you do the same for racism? The only things that imply ordering when they are said to be "not equal" are real numbers. I don't know about you, but I'd hate to reduce people to that.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 01:58 AM
2

I guess it's just my own fear/insecurities getting in the way. What you need to understand is that TRP is ultimately about becoming a man, a masculine person, with the knowledge that this stance is what procures our gender the most joy in life, and makes us most attractive to the opposite one (and femininity is the same for women). Watch a movie, any movie, shot before 1970. Or Mad Men. Look at the male characters, how they talk, how they behave, how they stand straight and live their life with …
/r/askTRP05/01/15 11:13 PM
3

Women want a man they can admire, men want to be admired. This is why women lose interest if their guy were to do what your gf is doing. But you see how it doesn't really bother you, right? It may make you a tad uncomfortable, but it doesn't make her less attractive in your eyes, does it? Now, be aware of another aspect: this may be a shit test (subconscious, but what shit test isn't?). By showering you with praise, she can determine whether you truly are great or are faking the confidence. So t…
/r/askTRP05/01/15 06:13 PM
12

That said, the professor fucked up. Male hamster all you want; he was in the wrong. You can argue he acted unethically... but so did the undergrad he was sleeping with. The story is portraying this as sexual harassment and assault, and the undergrad as a victim, but the order of events and the side comment "someone I considered a friend" makes it much more likely that the undergrad was a willing participant and maybe even initiated the whole thing. Sexual favors exchanged for advancement happen …
/r/TheRedPill01/01/15 10:29 PM
1

When is it ok to punch a man? If you have an answer to that question, ask yourself the follow up: why should there be a difference between the answer to the previous question and the title to your post?
/r/askTRP31/12/14 11:14 PM
10

Even if women are expected to quit their jobs to take care of children, they won't pair up with a guy who doesn't have a more prestigious job than themselves right now. They want a middle-manager at the very least, and, well, being high status only means you're above a lot of people, so everyone below you automatically is low status. This is why getting women in the workplace is such a bad idea: in cultures where status matters, you're automatically condemning everyone below average to celibacy.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/14 06:41 PM
3

And it could be a case of a relationship running its course. What does that even mean? This is an excuse primarily given by women that all of us here should know means "I stopped feeling tingles/I never felt tingles, I was just with him for convenience and now I think I can do better". Seriously, ask yourself when you would ever say that about your own relationship with a girl? For me, it would be to let a girl go and avoid drama, but it would mean exactly that: I can get better than you, and I'…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/14 05:36 PM
6

Even if you are in a state with wiretapping laws that require two way consent, do it anyway. Yes, that's right, I am advocating you break the law, because the law is failing us and has thrown out presumption of innocence in rape cases. It is better to be found guilty of wiretapping than of a rape you haven't committed. And even if it can't be admitted as evidence in court, as others said, it can be used as a dissuading factor or posted online or released to the press to sway public opinion.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 04:31 PM
45

Let's not forget that women do not have the same social and legal accountability as men. A scorned woman can key your car, trash your stuff, hit and injure you and the cops will do fuck all about it, they'll say it was joint property, or that you're the primary aggressor. Even if she doesn't go this far, your friends will take her side, and that can even affect your job in some cases. So why risk it?
/r/TheRedPill21/12/14 09:30 PM
5

"It's scary and he doesn't care because he is above the law and he was told that it doesn't matter, he was told that it wasn't his fault, he was told he wasn't going to get in trouble" I'm pretty sure this applies exactly to women who regret sex with someone and then accuse them of rape. One could even imagine the same thing playing out in a case where the teacher is male and the student female. But we have consent laws and we must apply them equally.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 09:20 PM
2

Curious though, was there anything important in the stuff she left at your place? If it was more than just toiletries, like maybe a dress she really liked or some expensive jeans, I'm tempted to say you could have kept it in a box for her. At the same time, you went to go pick up your stuff, if she really cared about any of those items, she had plenty of time to go get them. Beyond that, I say who cares if the execution wasn't flawless, in the end you kept your self-respect and she hopefully lea…
/r/askTRP21/12/14 08:55 PM
1

Censorship is the practice of filtering out content from forms of expression that the censor of the party they are acting on behalf of finds objectionable. This is exactly what happened here. While all breeches of the 1st amendment are acts of censorship, not all acts of censorships are 1st amendment violations. I understand where the confusion comes from, but it's a dangerous one, because if we stop recognizing legal forms of censorships as such, we start feeling comfortable in rejecting ideas …
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:55 PM
2

One person cannot change society for the better. We're individual agents, so it's obvious we're not going to go on a concerted effort to do it. But a society is made of individuals, and by reproducing you are going to influence it in some way. If I have kids, and I can do something to push the world in a direction where they will be happier, I want to know what that is.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 08:01 PM
0

Yes it is, but what are we going to do - start banning condoms too? Stop the pill? There's different ways to bring back consequences of sex for women. If you want to be libertarian about it, you can stop requiring the pill to be covered by medical insurance, stop subsidizing abortion (thus making it a significant expense) and remove child support. It seems that most people on this sub would prefer this approach, but that's not the only way to achieve this goal. Other political inclinations prefe…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 07:37 PM
4

Reproductive strategy is part of sexual strategy. Some men want to have sex while avoiding having kids, but some are very much interested in securing the interests of their progeny (hence why we have discussions about the worth of marriage, LTRs, how to navigate family life and what to teach our kids). Ultimately, TRP is about becoming better men, and no matter how much society wants to change that fact, men are still in charge of society. Enjoying the decline is a perfectly valid stance to take…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 07:05 PM
1

It's not that simple. If a woman wants to rope you in for child support, the legal availability of abortion won't change anything. What that law would do is shift some power from women to men. Now, instead of women having all the choices, the man who can choose between giving support or not, under some circumstances (he still can't force a woman to abort).
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 07:00 PM
9

If we're going to go with "just don't have sex", let's apply it consistently and outlaw abortions. That's what the GOP is trying to do in some states, but of course, it's oppressive speech when directed at women.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 06:49 PM
1

Heh, someone's gotta do it. It's like with Greenpeace, I don't think they can change much directly, but their existence and whining does affect people's perceptions. I'm glad they are providing this kind of societal pressure.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 06:44 PM
3

A relationship should be based in mutually amicable terms, not the terms of one side over another. Did you mean to say "mutually beneficial"? Amicable relationships with women is the easiest way to make them lose interest.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 11:44 PM
27

Looking into the author, this goes beyond regular female solipsism, and falls squarely into narcissism and egomania. She's promoting her "book", which she sells for $4 on Amazon as a kindle ebook (anyone can publish something like that). It of course, has no reviews, but there is an enlightening 3 page sample. The title is "Conversations for Smart People", and the second section is another list, "10 Reasons Being Intelligent is Difficult". Watch out guys, this is a being of superior intellectual…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 09:30 PM
15

What we are witnessing here is the gender reversal of a neckbeard complaining how the world is cruel to them even though they are nice: a woman of low SMV (black, masculine face, extremely aggressive attitude) trying the convince the world her failures are due to the unkind world she lives in. It's a particularly cruel kind of tragedy. The more a man is confident, the more successful he becomes, which feeds his confidence, but for a woman, the effect is opposite. In fact, the exhortations from f…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 09:20 PM
1

Because, once again, projection! Political lesbianism is quite widespread, so they believe political male homosexuality is too. I've never heard of a single case though.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 06:10 PM
1

In what are you sexually submissive? Are you simply turned on by the idea of being whipped and like BDSM porn with female domination, or are you actually currently in a sexual relationship where you are submissive? If it's the latter, great, if you found a woman who loves to be the dominant partner, best of luck to you both. If you on the other hand have trouble finding a sexual partner, and you would like to bed girls but want them to be dominant, bad news, it's going to be really hard. Our sex…
/r/askTRP11/12/14 04:17 AM
13

Funny, one could argue that in traditional Christian settings, it's exactly the other way around and women do indeed control the community. It's the contrast of overt versus covert power. Men are usually more comfortable and better at over control, and women have a natural for covert control over men. But in Judaism, there's a cultural emphasis on covert modes of influence through intellectual pursuits, so it would make sense this would translate in some sort of reversal of tasks in the family u…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 06:59 PM
6

Keeping frame is a power play. The reason you think it's impossible to always deflect is that you are worried that you'll end up losing the girl if you keep pushing. But that's exactly what you want going on in her mind instead. Deflections tell a woman that she should stop bothering you with a question, because you may be playful for now but if she keeps it up, you may get annoyed and walk away. It's of course possible that she doesn't value you so much, then she may be the one to walk away, bu…
/r/askTRP08/12/14 04:05 PM
6

You can hear her voice getting weaker and have the distinct sound of long-range voice when he moves away from her. The dude is just wearing a good quality mic.
/r/MGTOW07/12/14 02:36 AM
14

Other guys hit on you, guys who would tell you they love you, hang out with you all the time, never come home drunk with a bar slut, and behave exactly like you say you'd like Rick to behave. Yet you stay with Rick. You said it's because he's amazing, but haven't explained in what way. The person suggesting you post here was probably playing a prank on you. You see, this sub knows that the behavior you say you hate is actually what makes you crazy about him. We advise guys how to behave like Ric…
/r/askTRP07/12/14 02:05 AM
3

It is. Swallowing the pill is after all becoming aware and accepting that human behavior follow rules outside of our immediate consciousness. If it were commonplace to view ideology as a control of your life, much fewer people would buy in. I'd like to suggest you go a step further and consider that it is simply impossible to be free from ideology. Everything we do is motivated by some internal code. This code has to be consistent for your life to have purpose, and needs to adhere, at least in t…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 01:28 AM
9

Exactly. I remember reading this core concept of patrilineal logic: A woman can always have her child. If she didn't marry, her child was hers. It could have her name, she could have 100% say on everything that happened to it, no problem. The only issue is that caring for a child requires resources, and up to very recently, a woman was incapable of doing all that alone. A man though, can do that alone, however he is incapable of producing a child that is his in that sense. This is where the trad…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 12:37 AM
1

What about settling in and getting a more laid back attitude regarding your relationship with your GF, is that even possible? Yes, that's called lifelong marriage. It used to be a thing. But really, your question is ambiguous. What do you mean by respect? I found 4 different definitions, and it goes somewhat like this: admiration, having regards for feelings, avoiding interfering with and abide by (that last one pertains usually to laws, not people). Admiration? To a degree. There must be someth…
/r/askTRP04/12/14 10:28 PM
13

Don't underestimate the power of solipsism. These women cannot see anybody else's suffering but theirs. Who cares if a man been crushed by some machinery at his workplace, she received a compliment from a beta at hers, and that's unacceptable!
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 07:52 PM
18

Religion did not enforce patriarchy. Consider that around the world, every single advanced civilization, with no or little contact between one another, and with very different types of religion (polytheist, monotheist, pantheist) all developed similar rules for marriage, sexual mores, patrilineage and gender roles. Anthropologists will rebuff this with claims of a wide diversity of social organizations, but that's why I said "advanced civilizations". A matriarchal society spanning a few dozen vi…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 07:48 PM
22

Feminists did not want men to stay faithful to women. Feminists did not want to create equal households. Feminism is a belief system born out of women's solipsism, and the idleness and wealth of a few educated ones. They never bothered to think things through, to analyze how society really worked, they looked to a few wealthy men, saw they had a pretty good life, did not see the effort those men had to go through to get there because they themselves never had to make any effort, put on their lit…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 06:54 PM
4

Christ and Pop Culture That's your problem right there. This is feminism with a very thin coat of christianity on top.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 12:41 AM
11

I don't disagree with you, I'm all for a balanced lifestyle, I was just trying to explain how these guys see it. For them, the initial barrier is completely demoralizing, but making more money is easy.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 07:01 PM
39

Working out and heating healthy, and staying on top of such a regiment takes time, discipline and above all, motivation. Each person has different motivators, and for those rich but fat entrepreneurs, it's managing a business and making money. They pour all their energy into it because that's what's making them tick, so at the end of the day they have very little for taking care of their appearance. On top of that, businessmen, more than anybody, understand the concept of cost vs. benefits. To t…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 06:15 PM
5

Also, no person, regardless of gender, is a loser/deadbeat for spending X years on the dole. And of course, no one is ugly or fat or wimpy or whiny, we're all smart an beautiful and so so awesome, and can't we please just hold hands and sing Kumbaya to stop all wars and world hunger?
/r/askTRP26/11/14 06:05 PM
3

A woman likes a man who could cheat but doesn't. The reason for not fucking her friends should be that your girlfriend is worth more than the others, but that's basically saying the ball is in her camp. If she stays in shape, doesn't give you trouble, is sweet, caring, cooks and is a true first officer, then she is indeed worth it. But a slip in that behavior breaks this principle. So in fact, this situation is the best way to maintain dread and force her to be on her best behavior.
/r/askTRP24/11/14 08:42 PM
11

You wouldn't think it, but the (anecdotal) data is there. Lots of people on TRP have reported that girls obsessed with horses are terrible to date. My own experiences with them is limited, the two I knew were pretty crazy, not good looking enough for me to ever consider as potential partners, even for a ONS. I have to admit that my sister used to love horses and horseback riding, and her behavior seemed to have improved as that interest passed. Causes for the connection are unknown, but one theo…
/r/askTRP21/11/14 01:09 AM
2

While for men, it doesnt affect at all. It does, pair bonding ability also decreases in men with every new sexual partner. It's just that it is much weaker, and men are more likely to stick to their wedding vows (whether that's because men get screwed over by divorce while women get rewarded, or only because men have a higher sense of responsibility
/r/askTRP20/11/14 01:26 AM
5

BJ expertise is a bad indicator, but boldness on the first time is. Having sex with a new person has a very strong impact on brain chemistry, and women are especially affected by it. Each new partner requires a refamiliarization to feel comfortable, but that effect fades the more you do it. That's why girls LMR, they intuitively know guys are sensitive to the levels of comfort, so they artificially increase it. But it's not so easy when they are already in the act, the heat of the moment and wit…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 10:50 PM
7

It's an emotional redirection tactic, and women are particularly good at it. You can't defend against it, whatever you say from that point can be used to confirm the accusation. Accusing a woman of menstruating or PMSing works the same way, but we know how vocal they are about it being "NOT OK" to ever say that to a woman.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 10:27 PM
21

Think of the oneitis as the annoying chemical reaction in your brain that formed because of that idealized version of her. They drive your emotions, but that's all they are, and you are a MAN and you have control over your emotions, unlike your ex. That's what makes you better than her. Good luck with it bro. That was a fucked up story.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 02:26 AM
151

I've said it before, but it is worth repeating: if your past is not my business, then my future isn't yours. If you lie about your N, I will lie about how committed I am to you. If you refuse to tell me your N, I will refuse to tell you if I see a future with you. If you think me caring about your N is a mark of insecurity, I'll also tell you you're insecure when you ask me where our relationship is going.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 12:34 AM
9

They may also suddenly realize that the higher the number they own up to, the more beta the guy who would agree to marry them will be.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 12:21 AM
3

As long as you own it. Also, if you happen to be male, admitting to not remembering the exact number of sexual partners is a bit like admitting to not remembering the exact number of kills on your last hunt: maybe a tad irresponsible, but probably a mark of skill.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 12:19 AM
231

Another gem from the comments: Eh... I don't think your number is very high and I don't think it's anything to be ashamed of. I do not tell men how many partners I've had, I honestly don't think it's their business I'm absolutely not ashamed of it, that's why I don't want to talk about it.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 08:20 PM
32

Well, I'm sure there's something like a Dunbar's number for sex. I'm pretty sure after 20 or so, it's not easy to recall the count, unless you look at your calendar, phone and trace back the evidence. What's certain is that if you can't remember the exact number of sexual partners you've had, you're a slut.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 08:15 PM
27

There used to be safe havens, there were called the pub, the club house, i.e. male spaces. Feminism is attempting to destroy them, and although they can police buildings and institutions, they can't control a group of human beings. Your male friends, real friends, are the only ones able to help you deal with your emotional pains without making you lose your masculinity and therefore your desirability to the other sex. Women do not need this from their friends, which I suspect is why their friend…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 01:14 AM
10

And women know this, this is why so many of them will disdainfully make jokes about a man "not having cut the umbilical cord" when he is close to his mother and makes use of the emotional help she provides. That's why you have bros, other men who are at similar stages in their lives who will understand without doting. A masculine but caring father is good too, if you have the chance of having one.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 12:23 AM
7

The only reason to wait 8 months for sex is if the girl is a virgin and wanted to wait for marriage, the wedding planned for within 6 months but then there was a death in the family and it had to be postponed. I can't think of any other reason to wait that long. Especially if you can hire a prostitute legally. Now start showing her you're losing patience and you're going to walk away.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 05:55 PM
21

If you reverse all of her conditions, it becomes a similar one-sided raw deal for a woman. both are free to flirt, but no sex, "since we know that sexual infidelity is true infidelity" only with people in the social circle, that way it's all "safe" secretaries and coworkers are even better everything has to be kept in the open, so there is no deception And finally, add a clause that if either wants a sexual relationship, they have to end the "relationship", but the sex should continue. I'm prett…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 07:42 PM
23

Not necessarily a zero-sum mindset. Social cohesion is the recognition that the group can achieve more if some limitations are placed upon all of its members. Boldness is useful, especially to attract a mate, but some things can only be done from a standpoint of security. If you can't trust the rules to be enforced, there is very little you as an individual can hope to accomplish without an unreasonable amount of risk. The rule of the doghouse goes like this: as a man, I want to have sex, but I …
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 12:36 AM
130

The couch, the doghouse, the excuse gifts, it's all things society now expects men to put up with, and with a smile. What's fascinating is how men love to make jokes about this. If you mention your woman having any sort of disagreement with you, they'll bring those things up even more often than women do. I thought about what psychological process is responsible for this and I have a pet theory. Basically, it's an extension of the crabs in the bucket. These men don't like the idea that a woman w…
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 11:58 PM
3

Oh, I'm not saying she knows what she's talking about. She's clearly projecting her feminine mindset into the situation. But it begs the question, what is the right advice for this guy? Is he simply beyond salvation?
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 11:24 PM
3

Really he needs to be less forgiving and have her crawl the fuck back to him and plead for forgiveness I'm trying to image how this would play out. On the one hand, he's clearly plugged and would realistically not be able to do something like this (he wouldn't be in this position otherwise), that's why people are advising him to divorce. But it's also true that divorce is messy and he risks loosing both his money and his kids. So how would this scenario play out, assuming he was "touched by the …
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 11:22 PM
17

Ok, so friendship with a chick is either about the guy being beta and still hoping to fuck her, or an alpha using that chick to get access to other hot friends. Doesn't really sound like friendship to me.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 10:24 PM
22

Just thought I'd point out the whole context: I'm so so sorry this happened to you. But you need to think about what's best for the kids, not you. This woman is a vile snake who was willing to ENDANGER HER UNBORN BABY. I say this as a woman. Lawyer up and take her to the cleaners. She deserves to be put out on the street and never see any of her kids again. I agree that the "think of the kids" mentality is exactly how men get screwed, because outside of pimping them out to pedophiles with STDs, …
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 09:56 PM
26

Actually, it sometimes is. When you're tired especially, all that stuff is much more tiresome than vanilla sex. I do enjoy it from time to time, but I don't need it to get off. My girl does, so if she keeps begging, I sometimes oblige because, as I tell her, I'm such a nice guy.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 05:33 PM
1

Much as how we men on here have "seen the light" and work to resist the workings of modern culture, could a woman not similarly be awakened? There's even a RP women sub. Yes, but ask yourself, what has brought you to TRP, and especially, made you stay? I doubt that the natural alpha who's never had to struggle to get a date (if that guy even exists) would find much value in it. For him, it's easy, so why are these guys making such a big deal out of it? Well, your average girl is just like that n…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 04:44 PM
1

There's a difference between making mistakes like trusting an untrustworthy friend and learning from the disappointment, and making fundamental mistakes in behavior and long-term planning like doing hard drugs or dropping out of school. The first is unavoidable, people make mistakes, and it's not something your parents or role models could save you from. I'm talking about doing things everyone around you knows is a bad idea, but you do it anyway, get burned and then rationalize that it made you …
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 04:35 PM
7

This seems to be a millennial invention. The idea that you should spend your youth making mistakes then stop making those mistakes once you get older is the new social paradigm. I'll agree women take advantage of it much more than men, mainly because they can. It's funny when you think about it, pretty much every generation has had a period when they thought their parents were wrong and making a bunch of mistakes as a result, but it's a historical first to believe in making those mistakes on pur…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 01:24 AM
2

I'll just say this: a forum for deer hunter is, ideally, a place where experienced deer hunters share their knowledge for the benefit of other, less experienced deer hunters. It is not a place for deer, nor is it a place for fishermen. They can have their own forums.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 12:57 AM
1

A woman who has been raised in a traditional environment will have had solid sexual restrictions placed on her, so she won't be used to "options", because those will not really be options in her mind (unless for some reason, she gets 3 marriage proposals a day). But it's very important to understand what that traditional environment must be. It's not enough to come from a very religious family. The pastor's daughter won't be immune from whoredom if her circle of friends have "modern" parents. Th…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 12:52 AM
1

since then I've gotten pretty ripped and led her to get in shape as well So neither of you used to have a lot of options. I should have added a clarification in my original post that a girl who is used to not getting attention will likely stay humble and loyal. If she were to even start looking elsewhere it would be almost comical as she has never had much of an idea of how to flirt at all, even with me. Typical of a girl who did not get tons of attention. Yes, if you can turn an ugly duckling i…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/14 09:29 PM
4

What is a unicorn anyway? A woman who is young, pretty, feminine, knows how to cook, has a low partner count and will be loyal forever, but is also pro in the bedroom? That sounds just like the list of impossible criteria of the hunky handyman millionaire prince charming most girls think they deserve. A loyal girl is not too different from a loyal guy, in that their loyalty comes mostly from an early realization that their options are limited. The difference is, with a sexually liberated populat…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/14 07:26 PM
2

That's a very west-centric view. It might well play out this way, but when you say it will "contribute to the decline and death of mankind", I think you're getting ahead of yourself. For the vast majority of people on the planet, the pill is inaccessible and IVF is science fiction. Even if they were given the technology now, you can't expect their attitudes to change faster than it did in the US. In the meantime, their population growth continues, while the westerner's shrinks. So I would add th…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/14 07:00 PM
18

This mindset is also how you get rid of LMR. You need to show her that if she doesn't know if she wants to do it, you know you don't want to do it at all.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 06:20 PM
1

But it does have a lot to do with the feminization of society, lack of prospects for young men and lack of a social moral direction conducive to family-forming and procreation. AFBB has always been there. It may have been more controlled in the past, but women still need a certain degree of deception to make it work. The real social issues come when you have a large male population that can't realistically hope to find a wife and form a family over which they have some sort of fatherly authority…
/r/askTRP08/11/14 06:32 AM
2

Yes, it sounds like either OP was only ever superficially in charge, or he completely changed his ways with this woman. Let that be a warning to others: do not even contemplate having kids or marrying a woman unless you feel she follows you in everything you do. If she isn't, enjoy the relationship but make sure you can eject with minimum damage at a moment's notice.
/r/askTRP07/11/14 07:20 PM
3

I'm not too sure how "psycho" has been popularized, but the net effect is undeniable, and it's somewhat similar to the charge of "terrorist": a "bad" person, someone who does something evil because they are evil themselves. For the majority of people, it ends there, and it's really a progressive replacement for "this man is (possessed by) the devil". But even for slightly smarter people, as you point it, it's extremely misleading. Psychopathy is a lower-than-normal concern for other people's fee…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 07:09 PM
7

What's the point of a man being confident if the woman is very shy and meek? For one, men and women value different attributes in their mates. Some women like sexually experienced men, some women prefer them less so, but they will almost universally want a confident one, and the issue of the sexual past is secondary. Similarly, some men prefer confident, louder women, some prefer them meek, but almost all will prefer a woman with a lower partner count. Second, it's all relative. I said that opti…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 12:17 AM
7

Optimally? Be a virgin on her wedding day. Women often look at this as if their past didn't matter. They badly want it to not matter, but it does. If a woman has easily spread her legs for lots of guys in the past, and is making a guy wait, he will feel like he's paying a premium for used goods. If she hops in bed with him right away, he is bound to consider that she does this with other guys, thus not being LTR material. See how it works? Here's the rule for girls: do not make a new guy pay mor…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 11:37 PM
4

The feminist agenda isn't about preventing the pussy from going down. It's about asking for men's privileges for women and trying to keep women's privileges, while foolishly believing this won't bring the price of pussy down. The price of pussy used to be a lifetime access to a man's labor. This price was maintained in two ways: a) a social (not legal) standard keeping women out of the workforce and b) a social standard (mainly enforced by women) of low female promiscuity. Feminism destroyed bot…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 06:20 PM
2

i wouldn't dump a woman who was a slut Me neither. If I was not emotionally invested in them. The same way women's psychology is completely different when they "date" (i.e. get fucked by) alphas and when they "date" (i.e. enjoy the provision) betas, men's psychology will be different when they date (i.e. fuck) sluts and when they date (i.e. invest in) girlfriend. The trick lies in correctly identifying who is who.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 04:23 AM
3

the only part i disagree with is when the new guy tells her to leave The guy invested in her emotionally, and her revelation hurt his feelings, which he deals with the best way he can: by removing the source of hurt from immediate vicinity. The guy didn't know TRP, but still behaved the best way possible, given his circumstances. Let this be another reason why men should not invest emotionally in women, at least not until they are certain they aren't dealing with a slut.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 04:02 AM
16

It's about maximizing SMV power with no regards for the feelings of partners. An even better mirror would be a 20 yo guy telling a girl he's dating her now, but when his SMV picks up, he expects to dump her and upgrade to a prettier girl. It's good to remember that on top of provision/sex, status/youth and wealth/beauty, past/future are also duals. Women like the idea of "the past is the past, and it's none of your business", and insist that it's fair because it also applies to men. But since me…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 03:46 AM
8

For me, two white guys is worse than one black guy, but one black guy is worse than one white guy. How do I fare on your racism chart?
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 03:34 AM
16

Word. Everybody on TRP should read Steve Sailer's "Making Sense of the Concept of Race". It should be another step towards understanding evolutionary psychology, and the idea that genetics and culture influence one another as part of a complex system. TRP is simply the sexual component of that system.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 03:32 AM
1

Common fucking sense. It is my experience that when people invoke common sense, either their proposition is very simple to demonstrate rationally, or it's a placeholder for "that's what my feels tell me". Guess which one I think applies to you. If you think she raped that man I think rape is the obtention of sexual favors using violence or threat thereof. Unfortunately, that's not how the legal system and society define it, so what I think doesn't matter. She ought to be accused of whatever soci…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 10:08 PM
3

It isn't solely the domain of women, but it is a feminine way of thinking. This is just one way in which society is feminized. And that's not an insult to women, it's simply an evolved trait that serves a purpose. Men can improve their SMV through self-improvement, women rarely can. Instead, the only thing they can do is improve their attitude and make it a positive one, and this will work even if the hamster needs to take a second shift at the wheel. Men prefer happy, cheerful women, it doesn't…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 07:06 PM
2

You forgot a very important detail, the reason marriages exist in the first place: kids. Even in your hypothetical world, you probably won't want to divorce a lazy/bitchy woman if she's the mother of your kids. Suppose you even had a completely unfair system, and men could get rid of a wife like that, and keep the kids. First, why get married in the first place? The whole point of marriage is lifelong commitment, I know divorce obscured that fact, but that's what it was for. And second, you hope…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:58 PM
7

It goes hand in hand. Crack isn't illegal because the government wants to protect people who might be doing it from wasting their lives, it's illegal because if you allow a large enough segment of the population to do it, you increase crime, poverty and destabilize your society. Civilization works when both men and women are directed towards choices and activities that limit their immediate enjoyment (hard work, sacrifices) but optimize their long-term happiness, and create value for their socie…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:45 PM
2

certainly not those who didn't do anything wrong Which moral code do you use to determine wrong in this case? If you judge her by the western standards of morality, especially with the new attitudes regarding rape, she did something wrong. If you're not using those, what are you basing your determination on? Certainly not Christian moral values, because under those too, she's an adulteress. So you must be judging her according to your own feelings about what is ok or not, but then your perceptio…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 06:22 PM
1

True, but women are getting played for sex, men are getting played for commitment. They're quite different in impact and in duration.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/14 03:42 PM
1

I think you misunderstood my statement. I'm was talking about the deception being harder for men to execute. Men want to marry young, chaste, pretty women, and in the case the husband wanted a virgin, at least not a slut. While it's difficult to deceive on youth and beauty, women can very easily deceive men on their N. On the other hand, women want to marry confident, high status, wealthy and hardworking men. You can fake confidence a bit, but not the rest.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 11:58 PM
8

Of course not, but you're blaming him for not having knowledge that is not so common to come by and heavily repressed by our social mores. But you seem very quick to come to the rescue of the damsel in distress, you do have sympathy for her, because she didn't know better. Why is that?
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 07:49 PM
11

I love the double think about sexual freedom: woman has sex on her terms, because that's how she feels like at that moment: you go girl! Your past is your own, nobody can shame you for that. college guys have sex on their terms, with a willing woman: omg abusers! They took advantage of her!
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 07:46 PM
11

So, let's sum it up: Slut fucks around, gives blowjobs to college jocks, then lies to her husband about being a virgin so she can secure beta bucks. Beta has his life plans ruined and emotionally destroyed because of it, but no sympathy for him, he should have known better. Beta lashes out because of emotional pain, makes his wife cry. Slut gets feelings hurt because her own deception was not concealed forever, but sympathy for her. And of course, the one thing you find disgusting is that she go…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 07:43 PM
11

It's very difficult to see how a deception like this would play out with gender reversal, because it's virtually impossible to execute. I guess it would be the equivalent of a girl working hard and resisting the CC to find a good, honest, hardworking and loving husband, finding such a guy, getting pregnant and then finding out that he actually doesn't have a real job, he deals drugs, and has a whole harem of other women. It's deception of the highest order. She's a whore because, she easily exch…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 07:11 PM
2

Before that, if at all possible, prefer a work environment where you interact with as few women as possible, especially if they have any power over you. Too late for OP, but for young men entering the work force, the best way to deal with this shit is to avoid it altogether.
/r/askTRP20/10/14 08:30 PM
3

Settling is about realizing you will never be able to do better than a specific person, and deciding to swallow your pride and commit to them. It's something that happens to women because they are the ones whose value goes down with time without them being able to do anything about it. That's not how it works for men. If we work at it, our value goes up (until very late in life), so for the guys who weren't college football stars and naturally alpha, they can't get their league for the first dec…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 06:11 PM
0

Misplaced sense of honor and duty, not quite fully RP yet. Ultimately, It's not my money so I don't care if they feel like spending it to feel chivalrous. And neither does society.
/r/askTRP20/10/14 04:09 PM
1

Of course, anger is something he needs to get over, and he never should have been in a situation like this in a first place. My point though is that, supposing at the moment the girl left, OP was touched by the magical hand of the TRP gods and absorbed all of their knowledge at once, he would still have been correct to cancel her flight back with no remorse. He simply would not have done it in anger.
/r/askTRP20/10/14 12:33 AM
-8

WTF? Cancelling her flight was the only good thing you did in all that story. I guess now it's too late, but learn for next time: you expected an implied transaction (you paying for her trip so that there would be sex) and she took advantage of the fact it wasn't stated to get stuff from you and not give anything in return. That's fine and dandy, but you're entitled to do the exact same thing, i.e. since you never stated that you'd just pay for everything, it's your money, you can and should get…
/r/askTRP20/10/14 12:18 AM
1

You're comparing apples and oranges. A slut is not necessarily good in bed, and neither is a virgin doomed to never be able to become good, she just needs some guidance. We're talking abut marriage her, your sex freak being amazing in bed is all good and well until she divorce-rapes you. Virginity is a way to reduce the chances of that happening.
/r/askTRP07/10/14 02:52 PM
6

Absolutely, it is not sufficient in of itself. You also need to make sure she's properly feminine and actually profoundly against divorce. You'll never be 100% safe, but this mitigates the risks quite a bit.
/r/askTRP07/10/14 05:47 AM
8

No. Whining about not getting what you want is beta, setting virginity as a prerequisite for marriage is quite masculine. To me, requiring virginity just makes logical sense. We know how dangerous a divorce can be for a man, and that there's really nothing a married couple can do that an unmarried one can't (the bullshit about dependent's insurance and visit in the hospital is ultimately a question of spending a bit extra or going through more legal paperwork). So why get married? The only reaso…
/r/askTRP07/10/14 05:42 AM
4

Yes, but where a woman should use femininity, a man must use a more masculine approach. No beating around the bush, no being afraid of hurting her feelings, just state the plain truth: "girl, you're really fun, but there is something you need to change in your habits if you want me to stay interested". Then one of two things happen. Either she's gets offended and leaves, in that case good riddance, because she herself has no will and any efforts on your part would have been in vain, something so…
/r/askTRP22/09/14 05:34 AM
1

If you do everything by yourself, don't be surprised she isn't helping you out. A good leader delegates, and especially, knows how much or how little help he can expect. Start with the simple task of preparing the sandwiches for everyone, then move up to more elaborate things.
/r/askTRP16/09/14 02:16 AM
4

Absolutely, and like neveragoodtime said, Dalrock has already deconstructed it far better than I could. But the Christian message is indeed one of self sacrifice even when one does not see the immediate benefit. Modern Christianity simply pretends it doesn't apply to women. What's more, "show the other cheek" was supposed to be when your brother hits you, not when your wife disrespects you. The advice in the Love Dare book isn't intrinsically bad, it would actually work well for a wife trying to…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 06:12 AM
4

You're right, he could have stretched it out, said "wait, I thought you just mentioned your boyfriend. I came talking to you because I thought you were single, but I'm not the type of guy who gets involved with taken girls". See how she'd react then, the results would have been even more interesting.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 12:58 AM
12

You'll find plenty of examples... in fiction! Yesterday, I finally decided to watch Fireproof (it's on Netflix, I may not have bothered if I had to go out of my way to get it) for science. It was even more cringeworthy than what I expected. The writing is pretty horrible, but the situations portrayed are believable, in that the wife is obviously repulsed by her husband's attempt at being nice. It's really the very ending, where (spoiler alert, but it's not like you can't see it coming) she inexp…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 12:48 AM
-3

Think about the flip side though: a man can always improve upon himself, while a woman has to play the cards she's dealt and especially make sure she doesn't screw up. She loses value as she ages, as she has more sexual partners, as she has kids without the investment of the father. But that of course is exactly what the first image is trying to deny. Except men can't be shamed into thinking highly of a damaged woman.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:42 PM
4

I can give details if it matters but the long story short is that she's pretty much a poor wife. She puts no effort into making me happy. As a stay at home mother, she plays with the kids all day and is quite unproductive and is generally unattractive to me. Why did you marry her then? At some point you have to accept your responsibility choosing to attach yourself (and especially have children with) this particular person. I know that the social environment made this worse with its "love conque…
/r/askTRP13/09/14 06:15 PM
33

It's selflessness. TRP is trying to tell men to rethink the reflex of selflessness that was taught to us because women have become completely selfish. Being honorable when everybody else is dishonorable is a losing game. However, selflessness is still an honorable act when done with full knowledge of all the facts, it commands respect. It's the difference between blowing yourself up because you forgot to check the safety on the grenade and jumping on a bomb to save the rest of your platoon. Not …
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 02:06 AM
2

What you describe now is right, it's just your initial formulation implied the very common misconception that evolution is a optimal decision by the beings in question. I guess I'm just sensitive to it because so many people "believe" in evolution, as in they take it on authority without really understanding how it works. This leads to them dismissing evopsych on authority as well, which is a further indication they really don't get it. You don't seem to be part of that group, but I still think …
/r/askTRP13/09/14 01:55 AM
3

This is not how evolution works, the forces are not conscious choices, they are dictated by genes with were selected due to various environmental influences. Women are more attracted to older men because in the past, females that had genetic mutations that made them more attracted to older males had a survival and reproductive advantage over those with genetic mutations that made them attracted to younger males. One of these advantages was survival experience of the male, his ability to hunt and…
/r/askTRP12/09/14 06:47 PM
3

It's not surprising, men value honor and playing by the rules, it's what made us able to trust others and join efforts to build greater things than we would have been able to achieve alone. But for honor to make sense, the rules must be fair and people should be held to the promises they make. We've basically thrown that out by allowing divorce, so everything else crumbled. But it is interested to see the same people using techniques like push-pull to get girls to sleep with them, nexting those …
/r/askTRP12/09/14 06:25 PM
3

You are correct, but at the same time, you are basically saying that it's his fault for not having knowledge that is universally repressed. Imagine if every engineering school taught that wood is the best bridge building material, then some bridge gets destroyed in a fire, and people say "the engineer should have known to use steel instead". They wouldn't be wrong, but it's kind of missing the bigger problem.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 06:10 PM
8

You should white knight harder.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 06:02 PM
5

The problem I see with all these answers is the concept of cheating itself. The dating/ltr/marriage paradigm that we have today is often logically inconsistent and it is designed to go in line with the female reproductive strategy. It used to be simple: the rule was sex was exclusive between two people, the pairing had to be made official in front of witnesses, it lasted for life and was unbreakable. The sin/crime was that of adultery, which was simply "having sex with someone other than your sp…
/r/askTRP12/09/14 05:48 PM
1

Let's not forget "who has a tendency of getting herself in situations where she may die, so that he can better save her thanks to his superpowers". If there's one thing we learned about female-targeted literature in the 21st century, is that subtlety does not sell.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 04:43 PM
1

We have recently bought tickets to a travel we were planing for a whole month next january. We are going to share the expenses What does that mean? Who paid for the tickets, you and you expect her to pay for other stuff, or did you each pay for one? In the latter case, next, don't look back, and go on the vacation on your own. If it's the former, you should still next her and either try to get a reimbursement, invite someone else and get it transferred or simply incur the loss. If she's already …
/r/askTRP12/09/14 12:27 AM
4

Here's how it works: women want a "winner", and won't care about a male "loser" (but they will empathize with a female in need). In a competitive environment, the only way to win is usually to be ruthless, and sympathy for weaker people can be a liability. If you help "loser" men, you run the risk of being associated with them. That being said, the resources men offer aren't always taken from a finite pool. Feeding the poor may cost you money, but helping mentoring someone or giving them access …
/r/askTRP12/09/14 12:20 AM
2

Because women are attracted to confidence, and in a society where good men have been feminized, the assholes, the people who truly do not care about being a decent person, are the only confident men left. This is the main way feminism is shooting itself in the foot, by indirectly rewarding anti-social behavior.
/r/askTRP12/09/14 12:00 AM
3

Yes, but frankly, unless you're dealing with a professional who would use something thinner than a hypodermic needle, you can probably see any hole just by looking at the package.
/r/askTRP11/09/14 11:53 PM
7

It's just a subset of the phenomenon known as Mary Sue. These stories are fantasy fulfillment for the authors. The main difference is that the original Mary Sue was herself perfect, while in the newer stories, the characters' lives unfold in a perfect way. You'll notice that these Mary Sues are almost always written by women, it really is their analogue to men's porn.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 11:13 PM
0

The average girl I come across is not a SJW, but she isn't feminine either. In fact, I have met very few genuinely feminine girls. A feminine girl may believe some feminist ideas because that's all she knows, but that itself doesn't make her a feminist. Chances are these beliefs are very shallow and a quick prodding will make her abandon most of it, and she'll be open to the discussion. An actual feminist won't, she'll argue with you, talk about oppression and her femininity will fade quickly. A…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 10:32 PM
1

What do you consider feminine? To me at least, it goes beyond wearing pink, having long hair and being interested in baking. Behaving like a man and trying to competing with men is unfeminine. Being a loudmouth, swearing and arguing is also unfeminine. I guess it is conceivable to have a feminine feminist, but it would be a very strange animal. Feminism takes its hold in women's mind by stirring up anger and resentment, and that usually kills femininity. But maybe I'm wrong, so if you can descri…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 09:20 PM
4

Your biggest mistake was to be in an LTR with a feminist. If she's hot, bang her all day, but don't for a second give her a sign of commitment, and do not get emotionally attached. Save it for the feminine girls.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 05:57 PM
-1

Psychology is not a science, and social science lectures and programs are little more than political training grounds with a side of very basic statistics. Don't be surprised this kind of stuff happens.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:57 PM
5

The whole liberal concept of more taxes to "help the poor" is bullshit. They will call you uncharitable if you don't buy into that. Being obliged to give your money backed by a threat of jail time is not charity. Charity requires you give your possessions willingly and to have some control over where it is going.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 04:46 PM
1

The second season has fewer red pill examples, but it's still a fantastic look into human behavior. The episode of note is "Be Right Back". Spoilers to follow, don't read if you plan on watching: A woman loses her husband in a car accident. She is devastated, depressed and while originally resists her friends advice to use a service with an AI that could mimic her late husband behavior, she finally caves when she realizes she's pregnant. After uploading more and more personal conversations and d…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 04:24 PM
15

You'll notice that the West believes in democracy when it suits their interests. Arab Spring = good because dictators with non-western values = bad. When the US stirs shit in the Middle East, it's to back democracy, but when Russia does it in Ukraine, it's armed aggression. When a side is in the majority, t's a proof of the justness of the voice of the people. But when they find themselves in the minority, we suddenly need to introduce limitations to prevent people from being oppressed by mob ru…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 03:43 PM
30

Holmes Youthful Trainee Act - State law allows a judge to place a youth between 17 and 20... Applying this is purely at the judge's discretion. She gets 3 years of probation, is ordered to return less than 60% of what she stole, and if all goes well, she'll never have to disclose this to a future employer. I call that a major pussy pass.
/r/PussyPass10/09/14 06:28 AM
3

Not bad, but RP is not so much cheating back as realizing what the real rules are, and playing by them instead.
/r/MGTOW09/09/14 11:56 PM
4

MGTOW is about not letting interactions with women define you as a person and rejecting the notion that men somehow owe something to women and need to pursue them. And you'll find this proposition is pretty much a given in RP circles. Here's perhaps a helpful analogy: imagine you're living under a tyrannical government. MR is like trying to overthrow it, TRP is like learning how to fight it and MGTOW is like deciding to cautiously avoid it. A good revolutionary knows all three are valuable.
/r/MGTOW09/09/14 11:40 PM
1

A hyperbola would be of the form 1/x, and I don't see what that would represent. It also doesn't need to be exponential, it can just be accelerating (curving up) or decelerating (curving down). The latter would happen if there was some event that triggered it and it's now almost settled, the former would mean that things are getting worse, and fast. A linear progression is interesting, but not that surprising. The laws are not changing too much, but each generation is exposed to more and more ca…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 09:02 PM
5

I think you can be MGTOW, TRP and MRA, all at the same time. MR is a movement concerned social and political change for men's current place in society. Its adherents tend to be suspicious of TRP, but it doesn't need to be the case. You can be an MRA who doesn't believe that equality between the sexes is feasible. TRP is a set of principles that govern male and female interactions, think of it as analyzing mating rituals of some animal species, except the animals are us. A lot of the people who c…
/r/MGTOW09/09/14 08:28 PM
2

Its very easy to get a name and address just with a ip. Yes, but first you need to get that IP. The revenge porn site may have the IPs of the people who upload stuff logged, that doesn't mean they'll share this info with law enforcement, especially if they are outside of the jurisdiction.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 01:13 AM
1

Same reason some men like "unconventionally attractive" girls. When you can't have what you like, you learn to like what you have.
/r/askTRP08/09/14 11:20 PM
6

The first thing I thought when reading it was that, if it had been written by women, a female-oriented publication would have picked it up as an example of female empowerment, saying how cool these girl sound. It's another illustration of the active effort to feminize men and masculinize women.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 11:12 PM
2

No, girls who lie about rape do so for various reasons. Sometimes, it's for attention or to get away with infidelity, and then I agree, they really do not have any thought for the man accused. But they also lie because they regret the sex, or to get back at an ex, and then they absolutely do want to harm the man as much as possible, they're just unable to empathize, to feel the pain they will cause. I don't know what the proportion of the latter is, but I wouldn't dismiss it so quickly. But even…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 11:00 PM
9

Check the law in Arizona quoted above, it includes images where you can't identify the person. So all a girl needs to do is find someone who marginally looks like her, crop/blur the right parts, upload, and she's done. Also, a lot of girls are already willing to post nudes online for validation, it's not crazy to think they would do it for revenge as well.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 10:42 PM
8

Not even that, these types of websites are usually hosted in other countries with more permissive laws regarding porn. The owners won't disclose IPs, especially if their business model is based on anonymity. Then, like with rape cases, if the evidence is not accessible, they'll err on the side of punishing the man.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 10:33 PM
3

Her personality attracts a certain type of man; don't be that kind of man, and you won't attract that kind of woman. It's not that her personality attracts a type of man as much as a type of man isn't repulsed by such a personality. Men go after beauty, the question is whether they'll stay for the person. I don't think men who get together with toxic women like their antics, they simply like the eye candy more.
/r/askTRP08/09/14 10:26 PM
6

Your approach would work if you could "cut her loose". The divorce industry made sure that's not possible, she can fuck someone else in your bed then still take half your shit. Angry Harry remarked at some point that the irony of the divorce/domestic violence complex is that by freeing women from bad marriages, it remove their need to kill bad husbands. The result has been a decrease in male deaths in domestic settings, but no reduction in female deaths. Not getting married is of course the safe…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 03:24 PM
9

His uncle already got sentenced. Double jeopardy protects him against further prosecution.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 03:14 PM
22

I recently told this story to a female friend and she got very offended and told me there is never a reason to hit a woman. No, the rule is to never hit a lady. Bitches are fair game. It's true that you expose yourself to potential assault charges, and a court won't care if she hit you first, so just keep that in mind. But if you know there won't be legal consequences, like in your story, it's the best thing you can do, because there's really nothing you can do about an unruly woman. That's why …
/r/askTRP07/09/14 06:01 PM
66

Police told ONE News they looked at the circumstances surrounding Ms Kupa's streak and decided not to lay charges, though they refused to say what those circumstances were. The circumstances were the presence of a vagina.
/r/PussyPass07/09/14 03:52 PM
1

You're saying that dommes want men that are otherwise alphas but that submit to them, which means that in their relationship dynamic those men are not alphas. Exactly, alpha is a position wrt someone. Most women want to be submissive, they won't necessarily want the most dominant man, it's all about the power dynamic. An confident man who is submissive in the bedroom is not alpha.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/14 12:24 AM
19

That won't happen. the length of this custody would be limited by the need for the two children to see their mother, who had continued to have a role in their lives, even after the charges were laid. Yes, the courts have decided that there is a need for kids to have a pimp of a mother in their lives.
/r/PussyPass05/09/14 07:58 PM
8

The only way I can explain what happened is that she was under some kind of spell cast by that person. No. That's exactly what the husband is saying, that's exactly what the media is reporting in similar cases, and that's why the pussy pass exists. No, women are not "nicer", "more moral" or less likely to do horrible things to their children like people are led to believe. The average woman may not be capable of such an act, just like the average men is not capable of raping his kids, but this d…
/r/PussyPass05/09/14 07:56 PM
1

Unfortunately, due to her career she's taken to heart alot of the pro-women propaganda shit (she's read Sheryl Sandbergs Lean In - and loves it). I stopped reading there. Stay if you feel like staying, but if you have the inclination to leave and know you can get other pussy, run. Don't be in an LTR with feminists, nothing good will come of it. Also realize that if a woman sees a certain better prospect, a woman will leave you for him. Don't let a misplaced sense of loyalty hold you back.
/r/askTRP05/09/14 02:20 PM
1

Not necessarily hold their women to a lower standard, they want to be with hot chicks just like everyone else. But they can't, they're computer geeks, socially awkward, have been brought up to "respect women" and are legitimately incapable of scoring anything above the fat feminist. There is some truth to the idea of the lower standard, and it goes like this: geeky guys who can't get a girl are repeatedly told that their standards are too high. Seriously, I work in tech, the people I know who ar…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 06:59 PM
3

It puzzles me. She MUST know that many men will happily stick their dick in just about anything but are much more discerning about who they'll be seen in public with. I also wonder, is she so obtuse that she fails to see how a brag piece on the Internet about fucking every willing attractive man in town makes her useless as anything else but a warm hole... Something to hit and quit, or pump and dump if you prefer? It's not that strange, really. Women will want to date everyone they want to have …
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 06:52 PM
1

No, even in those cases, the average is the same. That is because of the mathematical definition of the average. Do the math, you'll see. The age cutoff does affect things, since you aren't dealing with pairing only within the studied population.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 12:21 AM
1

Very true, I didn't think about the age limitation.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 04:15 PM
1

If it happens in very large numbers, yes.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 02:56 PM
4

By virtue of how mathematics work. The average number of partners is the sum of all pairing divided by the population. If we assume heterosexual pairing, that means the sum of all pairing will be the same for men and women. Further assuming the population of men and women are the same, you end up with the same average. For example, take 100 women and 100 men, 80 women will sleep with 10 men, the rest remain celibate. Average for women is (80*10 + 20*0)/100 = 8. For men, it's (10*80 + 90*0)/100 =…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 05:45 AM
3

On Dread Game: it's a medicine. And like all medicines, you have to dose it in proportion to the ailment. Scale your dread game according to how confident/insecure your girl is. On Arguments: why are you even having arguments? An argument is a conversation based on strong emotions, i.e. on the woman's terms. It's not about not reacting, it's about refusing to engage. If she yells, you leave, if she cries, you comfort her but firmly let her know that if there is something that bothers her, she sh…
/r/askTRP03/09/14 02:27 AM
9

By the age of 21 they have had sex with an average of nine lovers - two more than their male partner. Just to be pedantic, they are probably talking about the median, not the average. Unless there is a huge homosexual skew, the average number of partners should be the same between males and females. But this is pretty funny, because I remember maybe two years ago, the news were reporting that men had an average of 9 partners, while women had an average of 3. At that point, I concluded that both …
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 02:18 AM
4

They can be right for the wrong reasons. Let's take an easy one, feminists' take on prostitution. Sex positive ones will say women can make their own choices, and prostitution should be legalized to provide protections for women. The opposite camp will say all sex work is exploitation and should not be allowed. Both of them still believe that men are evil and women must be protected from them, but one of them is essentially "right" about whether or not prostitution should be legalized.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 10:59 PM
1

Yes, you are right, I meant to say "complementary". As in, if the domain of possibilities is D, some feminists propose S and some D-S, then one of them would need to contain correctness.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 10:28 PM
5

The assertion that feminism is wrong 100% of the time is not, and cannot be true. First, feminism itself has internal conflicts and diverges in opinion (mostly because of the sheer contradictions between its core tenets), and when those differences are strictly mutually exclusive, you know that one must be "right" and the other "wrong". And that's assuming these areas do have a correct stance, there is a whole realm of propositions where it is impossible to determine what is true and what isn't.…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 09:59 PM
10

The number of false rape allegations didn't make it in the top 5 because people aren't talking about it. Feminists work very hard to make it unconscionable to even suggest there is such a thing as a false rape accusation. Then, if pressed on it, they'll first say that they are very isolated cases, then they try to get you to reverse blackstone's principle by saying so many rapists escape jail. Only when you really, really press on, they'll try and quote false statistics.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 05:05 PM
1

The current conflicts with the muslim world are West-instigated. Of course, it's about political influence and resource grab, but it is being sold as spreading democracy, and especially "ending women oppression". The majority of the propaganda about the necessity of conflict in Afghanistan for instance focused on that. While I'm sure under a different social climate, another rhetoric would be attempted, in my opinion, more insular and less feminist-leftist political tendencies would make the peo…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 03:29 AM
0

If you think the news is bad now, a world without nuns would be a far worse place. [...] Make no mistake, they are an integral part of the fabric that holds our civilization together. The way the rest of the article went, I'm not sure that's true. The stuff they quoted were really indistinguishable from what feminist organizations are doing. These nuns really seem to simply be feminists taking refuge in christian institutions. Yes, they do charity work, but they also use funds from the Vatican, …
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 02:19 AM
8

Feminism is essentially a religion. It has its doctrine (equality between the sexes), its mythology (female oppression), its sacraments, of which cannot be questioned or made fun of (rape culture), its structure and organization (NOW), its functions and services (take back the night, slutwalk) and of course, its hold over every stage of public and sometimes private education. We may be quick to laugh at our ancestors who all believed things we now know to be untrue and suppressed dissenting opin…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 02:03 AM
3

I see the assertion that "religion stunted scientific advancement" being thrown out by evangelical atheists, and so, true to their form, I must ask: what is your proof? Sure, some ideas were not allowed in the Christian or Muslim world, yet the most important medical and technological advances came from those civilizations. Surely, if religion was so "stunting", you could find an example of a secular civilization that beat them to the punch? The Chinese empire, dominated by ideologies you could …
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 01:54 AM
3

It's going to get tough for women if all men take that approach (not that I care, they've made their bed). We're starting to see that more and more: if they sleep on the first date, they feel like sluts, but if they don't, they don't get a second date. And with every guy they do open their legs for, their value goes down.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 04:54 PM
5

Not sure about the UK, but in the US, they put you in jail if you fail to pay child support.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 05:14 PM
1

Let's not forget that if you don't pay your alimony and child support, you can also go to jail.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 05:04 PM
8

There are many other things one can use as a weapon. Push a man far enough, and a tire iron can become just as deadly as a gun.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 05:01 PM
18

To go back to my analogy from the other day, that EMSK post was basically saying that learning sales techniques will kill you inside because of the potential of becoming a dishonest salesman, and while having your clients take advantage of your generosity is not great, you shouldn't do anything because you'll become a conman. It supposes that the reader is so weak that he will inevitably burn himself if given some tools. It's a strategy for losers, people who are content with going passively thr…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 04:40 PM
11

Women aren't a commodity, but their sexuality is (just like men's labor), it can be traded for money, and has been since humans invented money.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 10:55 PM
17

Alpha and beta are useful terms to describe a man's behavior towards women, and although it may feel that way, it's not like there are two buckets of men. You can have a man who has the traits of a good provider (disciplined, resourceful, caring) but also has confidence and charm. A lot of guys have alpha potential, they just don't know any better, and it's easier to turn a beta bucks into an alpha than get a player to settle down (just like you can make a slut out of a wife, but not the other w…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 08:53 PM
15

I'd add that in this day and age, a single father with custody of his kids shows that not only can he get sex from a woman, but he also demonstrated his provider status enough that he received custody (very hard for a man). A single mother shows she has spread her legs and that the father didn't want to stick around.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 06:32 PM
5

It's a symptom of female hypoagency. "God's plan" refers to things outside of your control. Meeting your future husband because your car broke down and a handsome stranger decided to help you is "God's plan", cheating on him later on is not part of "God's plan". But if nothing a woman does is really her fault or in her control, then you can really say things like "I found myself pregnant".
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 06:26 PM
7

Think of it as "God designed man to have free will". Kind of like a programmer designing an AI, letting it run in a sandbox, and periodically checking on it to see what it's doing, feeling some kind of sense of fatherly pride when it does something interesting, and laughing when it fucks up.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 06:12 PM
2

That's a good one. You fucked a slut with N. He fucked a slut with N+1.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 05:59 PM
12

Yeah, I loved how one article managed to blame a "sexist culture" on what happened there, when the top official responsible was a woman, when everyone admitted the reason they did nothing was that they were afraid of being called racist. Gotta fit those facts in the narrative.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 05:39 PM
5

Here's the thing though, if K is her boyfriend, she's probably sleeping with him. Your daughter should realize that her N matters, and every new guy she sleeps with hurts her SMV. It's like blowing cash away. So she wants to make sure every guy counts. If K is redeemable, she shouldn't use him for money but rather patiently and subtlety guide him on the path of masculinity. If he isn't, she should not be staying with him. As for betas she isn't sleeping with, I agree that there is little harm in…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 05:27 PM
35

I can make it shorter: Theft is bad. Being conned is like experiencing theft. Conned people experience shame, and worry that people will blame them for being victimized, therefore if you feel you have been conned, you were conned, and if you blame conned people, you are victim blaming. If you disagree, you're a theft apologist. That's their logic in a nutshell, but you really need the full picture to appreciate how they go from regretful hookup to rape.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 05:22 PM
168

Going on about how we don't condone sexual assault is playing into their frame. This bill has nothing to do with sexual assault because it is actually creating a new crime out of thin air. Here's how it goes: Theft is a crime, conning people out of their money is a crime. We have laws against those things. On college campuses, a lot of dumb students are falling prey to clever advertising that make them buy stuff they may not need. A lot of them say it feels like being conned, or worse, like bein…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 05:00 PM
47

It may not be the best idea for her to go around duping betas. It's not about "fairness" or "doing the right thing", it's simply that she's at her peak SMV now and should be using her sexual power to secure the commitment of the best guy she can find. The danger of duping betas is twofold. First, she'll become emotionally detached from these nice guys, and will need especially hard game to get interested, which will make her even more susceptible to players. These are not the guys who will inves…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 04:41 PM
0

She's ok, I'd give her a 7, but I don't think you can call her beautiful, and yes, that's taking her age into account. If the guy wasn't so beta, he could have scored that years ago, and nobody would really be impressed by his catch.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 03:36 PM
1

I guess I must be, since you're making such a convincing argument.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 11:42 PM
1

Marriage is official and (originally) lifelong exclusivity. How do I know when you are exclusive with a person? Is it supposed to be implied? Does it come after the "let's go steady" talk? What if this talk never takes place? The current dating paradigm has so successfully muddied the maters that different people have different definitions and expectations. So my individual rule is that, outside of marriage, anything goes.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 11:27 PM
1

Mine is quite boring, same as adultery: having sex with a person you are not married with. Now let's hear yours.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 07:31 PM
2

To remind everyone that "sex between two consenting adults who enjoyed it without consequences of STD or pregnancy cannot possibly be bad, especially in the past, so you just need to get over your insecurity". Contrast that with harmful sex, where the woman has her emotions hurt, which ranges from cheating to the current feminist definition of rape.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 07:26 PM
-4

Yeah, but even the guy in the picture is not obese. He's overweight sure, but obesity, unless it comes with a billion in assets, is unattractive to women. We're saying the same thing. Handsome means "ok" in the looks department, but that alone is not enough for a woman to be sexually attracted. It's obvious OP's looks would not have been enough to interest the girl.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 04:25 PM
2

This important truth is why social conventions and rules exist: so you can know what treatment to expect of others based on your behavior. The sexual revolution didn't change men's social treatment of sluts, it simply tried to conceal it from women.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 03:07 PM
1

What is your definition of "cheating"? I fear it is the modern version, twisted from the original meaning, to fit the female imperative.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 02:04 PM
16

I don't think you can be obese and handsome. To me, handsome sounds like "there is nothing wrong in the looks department, and I have no problem being seen around with him, but I'm not particularly attracted to him sexually".
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 02:00 PM
3

I'm glad I could be helpful. One thing I wanted to add was that how everything is relative and there is no "correct" frame. When's she thinks you're a jerk and you think she's overdramatic, both of you are "right" in their own frames. But since you are expected to lead, you must impose your own frame for her to follow. That's what maintaining frame is about.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 11:59 PM
2

Frame is a very high-level concept in human interaction. Our experiences and understanding are very contextualized, or in other words, we relate things to the state of mind we are in. For example, if someone is talking about dating and one person says "chick", nobody will think the word refers to a bird. This context goes beyond language, the same mechanism cements our assumptions about how things are, and more importantly, how things should be. What's more, humans are very prone to appealing to…
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 10:43 PM
6

I think you misunderstood the reason for the "Hail Mary" approach. You would be doing it because she is pregnant and can easily rope you in for child support, not because you want revenge. Then, when people say it is cruel, you can remind them that a) men have no other way to say no to parenthood and b) that women do similar shot with impunity anyway.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 07:54 PM
28

When 18+ years of your financial freedom is on the line, I don't think you can call it "petty".
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 07:25 PM
3

You know what this reminds me of? Scientific treaties about heliocentrism trying very hard not to offend the sensibilities of the readers by continually repeating "this does not invalidate your belief in God". I'm sure when Giordano Bruno was sentenced, someone said "we really need to do something because our faith and sacraments are under constant attack". This is how we humans operate, for better and worse: we establish sacred truths around which we develop social cohesion, and when everyone r…
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 05:24 PM
2

They have more power now, but they did have quite a bit of influence even pre-feminism. In most societies, at most social levels, women were still allowed to choose their mate based on their preferences. Families were there to help a young an inexperienced woman take a good man, but the mechanism of male-courts-woman-responds was there, and a marriage in which one party was forced was deemed invalid by most. Beyond mate selection, there is the whole raising part. The standard model is: children …
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 05:10 PM
6

That's why ethics is such a bullshit concept. Objective morality my ass, it's one of the many ways to rationalize things, and I see no evidence of it being superior to others. If "keeping the family unit together" was such an important ethical goal, why is divorce possible?
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 02:35 PM
1

It's simply the logical conclusion of the equality between the sexes. If women say they should have a right to be bossy, aggressive, have a career and act like alpha males, then who can deny men who want to be meek, emotional and submissive an analogous right?
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 08:19 PM
1

There's also the D.E.N.N.I.S. system, where they probably tried to take a jab at the PUAs, but still confirmed a lot of RP stuff.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 07:53 PM
6

Yeah, I guess that is really the best scenario (for her). If that was the case, she probably omitted to tell him she participated in a reality show one degree removed from porn.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 06:22 PM
-1

Question is, is this a guy she met on the show while "dating naked", or did she meet him somewhere else? If the former, he's just using it as an excuse to drop her, or he's really dumb and didn't realize this stuff was going to be on air. If it's the latter, wtf was she thinking, being on a dating show while dating another guy, without telling him? Any way you look at it, this situation is fucked up.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 05:55 PM
15

Variation on the theme: "A <insert girly drink> and a glass of water". Then hand her the glass of water and chug the girly drink while keeping eye contact. You need very solid frame to pull it off, but if you do, the reward is worth it.
/r/askTRP23/08/14 05:20 PM
5

Oh no, not this bullshit again. Look, you can do whatever you want with statistics, you can draw arbitrary buckets and make the world look the way you want it to. Separating women by college degree attendance is one such arbitrary separation, which makes it look like there's a causal relationship there. The truth is that chance of divorce is also correlated with age of marriage (remarriage potential, the younger the higher), IQ (higher IQ means higher impulse control) and most importantly, numbe…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 05:20 PM
5

They are completely right, worrying about keeping finances separate won't allow you to experience the deep emotional bond with that special person that you are going to stay with for the rest of your life... Oh wait, that's right! Marriage is not for life anymore, so you do have to worry and never will achieve that bond anyway.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 05:03 PM
2

Give her paternal love. Maternal love is unconditional love. When you fuck up, no matter how badly, no matter what horrible things you may have done, your mother (in theory) is the only person who will always love you. Paternal love on the other hand is based on merit. A father loves his kid conditionally to them doing the right thing. The children know (in theory) that if their father is disappointed in them, he will retract his love. The two types of love combined are what make emotionally str…
/r/askTRP21/08/14 04:55 PM
1

Alpha and beta are not about personality, honesty or niceness, they are about social dominance in a group. Alpha dominate, betas follow. From that point, we have seen that women are sexually attracted to alphas and repulsed by betas. Maybe you are confusing alpha with "red pill aware men I would like to emulate".
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 08:15 PM
0

No, indeed, being alpha is not about humiliating women. Being alpha is about obtaining consensual sex from women by given them what they desire, or the promise thereof. The fact that what this guy's actions are reprehensible does not change the fact that he fits the alpha definition. Think of it this way: there are two components to his story. The first is when he goes to get sex with foreign women by using his nationality and the status that comes with it. The second is him performing and filmi…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 05:24 PM
-7

This is obviously not a Red Pill example. The man is a sociopath From my understanding, we classify as "RedPill examples" stories where a man acts as an alpha. Also from my understanding, an alpha man usually possesses the dark triad traits, one of them being sociopathy. Red Pill does not mean "good" or "bad", I think we can all agree what he did was shitty. This should serve as an example of alpha behavior gone too far.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 04:36 PM
-2

Morocco isn't like here, it is a place where feminism is actually needed. I don't think there is a single place on the planet where feminism is "actually needed". Where women have it bad, men have it bad in other ways, to introduce feminism there would be to fuck their societies. It's already happened in a few third world countries. Feminism is never needed. Were he Moroccan, he would have been persecuted just the same for taking those pictures. It wouldn't have happened in the first place, sinc…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 04:33 PM
1

Why is it ok for a woman to cry, but a man is laughed at? Why is an overly confident man sexy, but a woman would be called bossy? Why is a woman who is nice and caring attractive to men, but a man like that is an unappealing beta? The sexes are different, men and women have different preferences, and a different experience through life. Don't try to think "why can women X but men can Y?", it's unproductive.
/r/askTRP20/08/14 03:26 PM
1

I'm using a more general definition, where it is any complaining you do for the purpose of social advancement. A man can't bragplain the same way a woman can, because paining yourself as a victim does you harm, not good. At the same time, a guy who would say something like "I have too much money" may pass as a douche, but if he does it in front of materialistic women, it might get him laid, a woman will just look like a bitch. Maybe we need a specific term referring only to what females do to ge…
/r/askTRP19/08/14 10:15 PM
2

Female Dom/male sub is a reversal of the normal (i.e. common and dominant) sexual order. Your partner has to prefer being a Dom, and not just in the bedroom, for this to work. Female Doms are not easy to find, a lot of them are only dominant to an extent and usually want to be dominant with one person and dominated by another. But just like chubby chases, men who are attracted to what most find unattractive, true dominant women exist. If I were you though, I'd try to get to the bottom of why you…
/r/askTRP19/08/14 08:54 PM
1

A few reasons. First, when you are being beta, it frustrates your woman. Men's response to frustration is to go and do something about it, women's is to complain and get someone else to fix it. But if the source of the frustration is you being beta, she can't tell you directly because she knows you'll listen and that will make you an even greater beta. If complaining is the only way to lesson the emotional tension caused by frustration, and they can't complain to you, it follows that they will c…
/r/askTRP19/08/14 08:43 PM
9

It's like listening to a child tell you about their day. If you care about the person, you care that they had a good day, and you may get some enjoyment out of listening to the story because the storyteller is cute, and tells the story in an endearing fashion. If those words were written on a piece of paper however, nobody would give a shit.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 12:01 AM
9

That's my point, why then does the law get to say "man's quality of life has to suffer more so woman's gets to suffer less"?
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 06:34 PM
10

I don't think it's specific, it was just an example. You could be doing what you like, but if you were to divorce, your quality of life would suffer in one way or another. I find it simply misleading to single out a woman's career sacrifice for her husband, and pretend she has some sort of right to support. Your employer doesn't keep paying you if he fires you or if you quit, same deal.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 06:26 PM
40

If we were to get divorced, she deserves some money to make up for the loss she's incurred for in her career. This is the popular reasoning behind alimony, and it is a little trick that plays into the feminine imperative. I know you guys are selfless, but consider the opposite for a minute: A guy has a job he really likes, it's creative, it has good hours. It doesn't pay a ton, but he doesn't care, because it allows him to live his life comfortably, and he's happier with the fulfillment and free…
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 05:00 PM
40

The girlfriend did not get punished at all. The judge, since he's up for reelection and has been smeared by this, went public with the videos to the press. The girlfriend and her lawyer deemed this to be an attack on her character, and released phone conversations where the judge is heard swearing, among other things because she canceled their vacation plans 12 hours before the flight. The media went with this to a domestic violence expert (guess the gender) who said the judge is clearly abusive…
/r/PussyPass16/08/14 11:05 PM
3

I wouldn't doubt it, and the political statement from his opponent dispelled any remaining illusion I may have had. Politics are dirty, people know it, don't play the game if you can't take the heat.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 05:11 PM
16

In the other video, where she goes full victim mode and releases their phone conversations, you can hear him calling her trailer trash. In another, he loses his shit because she bails on their vacations plans, for which he paid obviously, less than 24 hours before their flight. The guy knew very well what kind of person he was dealing with: irresponsible, impulsive and emotionally unstable. But she's an 8, probably hottest chick he's dated, so he stayed.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 04:08 PM
32

Imagine if he wasn't a JUDGE, how fucked would he be lol. Yet when asked if he would still appear on TV were he not a judge, he replied "If I wasn't an elected official, this would have been dismissed a long time ago". I know he is focusing on his political career, but that statement made me lose some sympathy for him. It would have been a great opportunity for him to recognize how easy it is for someone to accuse a person of domestic violence, how important due process is and how as a judge, he…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 03:49 PM
3

If you think women were not treated like humans, you bought into the feminist myth of female oppression. Do you think children are regarded as less than human in the law? After all, they are not allowed to vote, they need the consent of their legal guardian for certain things, and there are restriction as to what kind of labor they can perform. Maybe we need childism, so that all those ills would be rectified. Of course, childism would ignore the fact parents still have an obligation to house an…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 03:07 PM
25

The first wave was the common sense movement I beg to differ. Asking for the right to vote without the requirement they die for your country, asking for the right to work while keeping the privilege of being provided for and asking to be treated as equals while retaining special protections in the law is far from "common sense". The first wave of feminist was a shit test, an organized and socialized form of the same type of complaint women have been addressing their beta husbands throughout the …
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 06:17 PM
14

What are the restraints on female misbehavior? Women are still responsible for the crimes they commit, albeit given lesser sentences. TFN simply says it could be worse than it is now. And is he wrong? Feminists have been campaigning to abolish prison for women. There is still a way for a man to not get thrown in jail at the mere accusation from a woman; feminists want to put an end to it. And there is still a push to mandate a (minimum) 50% female representation in upper management, even though …
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 06:08 PM
3

Yeah, it's just you chose between a stance where you gain nothing and lose nothing, and one where you gain nothing and lose nothing but have a 50% chance of losing everything. Call me insane, but I don't see why anyone would go for the latter.
/r/askTRP15/08/14 05:35 PM
1

I would like to add, people often will quote the tax advantages, and then a little later in the conversation, when talking about divorce and losing half your stuff, they say "get a prenup". When someone mentions prenup can be thrown out, they immediately say you only need to get two good lawyers (one for each party), and then the prenup won't get thrown out. Let's assume all that is true. The cost of those two lawyers already balances out any tax benefits for a first few years. Add in the cost o…
/r/askTRP15/08/14 05:28 PM
4

Currently, 14yo kids fucking between themselves is wonderful, a 16yo guy with a 14yo girl is a pedophile and should be raped in jail, and a 40yo woman with a 14yo boy is an awesome teacher who apparently everyone wished they had. Lower it to 13 or don't, but at least have some fucking consistency.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:04 AM
3

Also, it's illegal for fathers to conduct a paternity test without the approval of the wife. So if she knows it isn't yours, she can block it and you will have to pay.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 07:08 PM
5

The law will fuck you over if they suspect you have undisclosed assets during a divorce. Simply don't divorce, and the best way to not divorce is to not get married.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 05:21 PM
1

Connections pay better than smarts in this world. I am not denying it. While I had good grades at school, I wouldn't be where I am without knowing the right people at the right time. Still, if I had been slacking off and only focused on social skills, I would not be doing what I'm doing now, and I'm not sure my job would be as interesting and pay as much. Notice that I did mention having a healthy social life. You need both, unless you're one of those geniuses with unlimited drive and energy. Th…
/r/askTRP14/08/14 04:40 PM
10

If you're asking how to attract girls, you haven't completely understood TRP, which is ok, you're in high school, you have plenty of time. My advice to you is DON'T. Don't try to attract girls, study hard and make sure you have a healthy lifestyle (food+exercise) and social life. The girls will come, and even if they don't right away, you're investing in your future. In other words, patience young padawan.
/r/askTRP14/08/14 03:20 AM
2

A woman is easier to train than a mountain lion. Problem is, all of society insists that you do the opposite, and that you just need to be nice not to get your face bitten off. In fact, the opposite is necessary.
/r/PussyPass12/08/14 05:08 AM
1

Are you married/have kids with her? If not, why can't you just leave? If you were a chick, everybody would tell you that you're in an abusive relationship (hell, just criticizing a female counts as abuse these days).
/r/PussyPass12/08/14 03:26 AM
4

Leave her, or at the very least, make her think you're checking out of the relationship. Never allow a woman to get even a slightly bit aggressive with you, if you do it's just going to get progressively worse.
/r/PussyPass11/08/14 08:25 PM
3

It's basically like saying "you should hire people on the work you need done, diplomas shouldn't be a factor". It's technically correct, and I've met quite a few brilliant people with no college degrees who were much better at their job than people with high GPAs from good schools. So if you have a knack at sensing genuine talent, yes, gender, degrees, race shouldn't matter. But the first rule of TRP is that women and men are psychologically very different. People fall outside of generalizations…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/14 04:56 PM
6

You should not be spinning women who are capable of having an emotional hold over you. If the plate is not 100% invested in you, she's not really a plate, just a hookup (or if you want, you are both each other's plates). Some guys can deal, others can't. If you can't deal, you should spin plates with lower SMV that are 100% invested in you. As time progresses, you'll be more resilient to this sort of thing, and you'll be able to pull hotter plates.
/r/askTRP09/08/14 04:43 PM
2

Men always end up paying to some degree, and I'm ok with that because as a man, money and resources are what I have in excess. But I only agree to pay after I've gotten the benefits, i.e. sex, home cooked food, or any other type of thing I any want from a girl and her giving it to me shows some dedication. Never pay for the first date. You did good.
/r/askTRP09/08/14 01:39 AM
8

If it hurts your feelings, then you should not invest emotionally in the girl. But it's not your "insecurity", neither is it your problem. A guy cheating on his gf is hurting her feelings, does that mean the girl is insecure? No, she simply doesn't like it, it is an emotional discomfort and she shouldn't put up with it, same for a guy. The "insecurity" concept is part of the feminine imperative, it values the emotional well-being of women over that of men. Don't play into it.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 07:22 PM
1

In other words, sex is better and divorce is less likely for couple with traditional gender roles, except for those couples that were formed after 1990, where having an egalitarian relationship doesn't seem to hurt. But since they're already going through great lengths to prove something that isn't, I wouldn't be surprised if this study was flawed, since everything else seems to point to the fact that traditional gender roles = maintained attraction = more sex/less divorce.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 12:25 AM
1

If you decided to not move out and your parents patiently paid for all your shit until you turned 35 and finally got fed up with you, shouldn't they continue to pay for your shit since you've been without a job for so long?
/r/askTRP07/08/14 05:16 AM
8

The friendzone is more than that. There's a reason we advise guys to start being sexual/flirty right away with a girl, and if they haven't, it's better to move on to another. Women immediately categorize men into either sexually attractive or not, and once categorized, it's almost impossible to move from the latter to the former (but the other way is just a mistake away). Men don't do this kind of immediate categorization, that's why the concept of the "slutzone" isn't taking hold. Instead, they…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 02:08 PM
1

Do not give compliment to women. They get their ego stroked all day thanks to social media, so there really is no need to make them think even more highly of themselves. The only time you can slip a compliment is when you're already in an LTR with a girl and she really need her spirits lifted. You may also very slightly compliment a female boss if you need something from her. But most times, don't, especially not to a girl you had a crush on, and especially not on social media.
/r/askTRP04/08/14 03:24 AM
26

Lead on nerdy guys for sex but not give them sex, everybody loses their minds. Not everyone, only people who have found themselves on the receiving end of this situation and therefore can empathize with the victims. Remember that most girls deny the existence of the friendzone, or at best say guys who have been led on should get over it.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 03:07 AM
10

Virgin and deeply religious solves your problem. First, there is absolutely no other reason a woman can invoke to demand marriage from you other than she strongly believes in it. Then you test if it's true: is she practicing and did she remain a virgin until marriage? If not, she's not really serious about it and she can't just change her mind about these things. But if her faith is strong enough that she resisted sexual temptations before marriage, she's much more likely to keep her vows, less …
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 03:03 AM
19

Oh no, a "the past doesn't matter" post again. I don't get it, you first say women are "masters of themselves" then call not to judge them because they are immature. Which is it, and what exactly separates girls from women? If an 18 year old can be tried as an adult, a college slut is completely responsible for her decisions and should be judged as such.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 02:55 AM
1

Lol, wut? How does this work? If I were to move to the UK, rent a flat and buy a TV, do I need to file some paperwork before it becomes legal or something like that?
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 11:51 PM
14

Also: A woman who sends mixed signals to a man and dangles the possibility of sex in order to get some emotional/financial benefit from him is leading him on. While it's a shitty thing to do, it's her right to do so, and it's the man's fault for being gullible. A man who is evasive to a woman and dangles the possibility of commitment in order to get sex from her is leading her on. While it's a shitty thing to do, it's his right to do so, and it's the woman's fault for being gullible.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 11:44 PM
6

Melissa Borrett, 26, [...] charges customers $100 per hour to clean their homes, and at their request, she can do the dusting in lingerie or in the buff [...] The young entrepreneur started the service in February. Now, just a few months later, she has three other women working for her. I call it prostitution and pimping, but sure, she's an "entrepreneur".
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 08:59 PM
1

The problem with Dawkins is that he believes that he doesn't believe. He is convinced that he build his popularity on rational though, and that his fans are similarly logical. He didn't realize he became a prophet of his own religion, and his atheists fans are really no different from religious followers: guided by emotions and believing in things they do not understand. And now, he made another mistake: not realizing that the demographic of his fans and that of another leftist cult, feminism, i…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 12:10 AM
2

Yeah, she doesn't sound like she has sexual desire for him. It's one thing to be burning with sexual anticipation but sticking to your principles (I would encourage someone to marry a girl like that), but this case looks like low libido and a genuine fear of sex. No more marriage material than the carousel rider.
/r/askTRP30/07/14 11:00 PM
2

she's willing to give blowjobs simply because it doesn't compromise her viriginity. Then she hasn't understood the definition of virginity, or the reason for not having sex before marriage. Think of it this way: you meet a girl who is beautiful, nice, caring, but she tells you she's spent her youth giving blowjobs to men for money. She says she never lost her virginity though, and she won't until she marries. Would you marry that girl? The point of no sex before marriage is manifold, and all its…
/r/askTRP30/07/14 10:57 PM
2

The only socially acceptable way to end any romantic relationship is to say that you "fell out of love". Anything else, and you put yourself at risk socially, and sometimes I'm sure legally too.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 10:41 PM
1

Considering two roommates may decide to romp after a night of drinking, and some "relationships" are virtually sexless, the line is blurry to be sure. Seeing as the whole reason for these provisions is to protect the "poor wittle women" from any financial hardship, I'm pretty sure even a female roommate could sue her male roommate if he was nice to her and paid more rent in exchange for less household duties.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 10:25 PM
5

Except the sleeping together, all of them could be applied to a roommate situation. Scary.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 10:04 PM
1

The only thing you omitted is the "marriage-like relationship", in your text, two roommates would be considered common law spouses after two years. But that begs the question, what does it mean for a relationship to be "marriage-like"? Cohabitation with a sexual relationship? Doing groceries together? Is that determined at the discretion of a judge?
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 08:59 PM
2

What male name will they appropriate next, Gabriel? In French, the feminine version of the name, Gabrielle, is much more popular than the original male name.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 08:00 PM
6

Exactly. Since you can't do anything socially or legally, your last recourse is to remove your financial contribution.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:50 AM
6

So much wrong. Freedom of speech does not mean "freedom to criticize the government", it means "government cannot prevent you from saying something you want to say". You can yell whatever you want, about anything you want in public, except for the very narrowly defined areas of libel, incitement to violence, and spreading misinformation leading to harm. Maybe I just didn't get the memo, but "harassment" used to denote continued aggressive pressure towards someone, for instance calling someone ev…
/r/PussyPass20/07/14 04:01 AM
2

People who come legally can also be deported at the whim of their employer: if your visa is tied to your job, and your job is "at will", like in California, you can be fired any time and forced to leave. If you don't leave, you become an illegal, so the question of deportation doesn't really have much to do with the legality, but with the immigration process. But I would argue that US non-citizen males may have it easier than US male citizens when it comes to family court issues. Take a citizen …
/r/MensRights19/07/14 02:32 AM
2

And now you see why affirmative action is a double-edge sword. Sure, she got the job, but she won't be trusted no matter how much feminists will screech about unfairness. If she is indeed competent, then she would have gotten there without the push for diversity, and people would have respected her. Not so much now. Whose fault is it?
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 11:29 PM
1

You're right, the goal is the same: make your wife happy, alleviate her burdens and be a responsible, strong man. That's why there is a common subtext. Unfortunately, his advice is often the exact opposite of what works.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 04:06 PM
6

Half of it is about being responsible and living in dignity. The other half is a cry to man-up and some egalitarian bullshit. I think we can do better.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:06 AM
7

That is true, the advice we are giving here to guys is not always to the benefit of women, and the right advice for a woman is often the opposite. I'm sure he's speaking from emotion-fueled conviction rather than a reasonable assessment of the world. So to play devil's advocate, if you take the exact opposite of his advice to women and put it from a male perspective, it's very red pill: Pressure her into sex (push for it, don't just expect it will happen) Do not become a "nicer" man than the one…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 11:59 PM
2

It's true they're vastly better than the ass-kicking angry Mary Sues you see everywhere else, but that article has some interesting points. For example, I found Shae's betrayal to be very surprising and uncharacteristic, and it looks like she's a more complex and believable character in the books. I guess you really can't escape the bias.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 05:38 PM
1

Speaking of Game of Thrones, have you read the books? I haven't, but apparently the show's characterization of females departed quite a bit from George R.R. Martin's portrayal. RoK has an interesting take on it.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 05:12 PM
2

Her rules would obviously not apply to women. Consider: You should never ask questions that you don't really want to know the answer to. Would she give the same advice to a woman saying she's afraid her man cheats on her? But the best part is: its unfair to her to stay with her while holding [her past] against her In this sentence lies almost all of the contradictions of the modern dating paradigm. On the one hand, nobody expects the relationships to last, and they can be broken off at any time …
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 12:01 AM
1

You sound very angry, did you fall for a smooth guy and now resent anyone who is trying to improve himself to be successful with women. Forget your assumptions, forget your question and let's assume for a moment that what you came here to ask is "Hi, I'm a young girl looking for a good husband. What should I do/keep in mind/look for?" To that, here's what I can say: your job as a woman looking for marriage is to find a man who you can trust to lead you, and then facilitate him in that job. In pr…
/r/askTRP10/07/14 07:00 PM
10

When a woman says the words "double standard", she's talking about the loss of a privilege she thought she'd have forever. It's almost always about something they had no problem with when they were young and hot, but now they hit the Wall it's a nasty surprise.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 05:36 PM
5

No, no, you don't understand. When it comes to intelligence, men mature much slower than women, we are idiots until we turn 60, and they are already way more smarter than us at 17. Except when it comes to sex and responsibility, a 40 year old woman may still be sexually exploited by her 15 year old student. But there's an easy fix, men just need to Man the Fuck Up™!
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 05:33 PM
13

Honor is a male concept, don't expect women to understand it. Honor is based on the need for a verbal contract: if you promise something, and you break that promise, other people may suffer as a result. Since past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior, honor is a means of knowing who to not get involved with in order to avoid bad surprises. That's a very masculine way of looking at things, women care about how they feel in the moment.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 05:11 AM
15

She can't logic: It’s not just a matter of two consenting adults’ hearts wanting what they want. Because not only are these relationships almost always an unacceptable abuse of power So which is it, consent or abuse of power? If it's the former, there is no problem, and she protests for nothing. If it's the latter, she acknowledges women have no agency, and it would therefore be better they are not allowed to go to college alone.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 10:21 PM
0

r/offmychest is a sub where users can whine, and others will validate them, with the constraint that everything said must be PC. What exactly were you expecting?
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 10:11 PM
19

I just read their sidebar, found this gem: Relationships, both platonic and erotic, should be built on mutual understanding, not emotional exploitation. Since they seem to like the Matrix analogy, that's like saying "machines should be at the service of humans, not the other way around!". Yeah, sure, believing in it won't make it true though. And what exactly do they think would have happened to Neo if he decided to "punch Morpheus" (or walk away)? That's right, he'd be stuck in the Matrix, basi…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 01:06 AM
101

Man: "How do I get successful with women and have sex with hot ones?" Everyone: "OMG! Misogynist! Women are people, not objects, get to know them and be nice, jeez..." Woman: "How do I get successful with men and keep the wealthy, high-status ones?" Everyone: "You go girl! You deserve what's best! Here's how you can trick them..." Funny how we even have a redditlog on the front page of a gold digger asking how she can get better gift from her rich boyfriend. Still gets me every time.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 09:11 PM
22

It's just women being envious of alphas. They instinctively know that "doing whatever the fuck you want" is a huge turn on for women when done by men, and a non-negligible turn off for men when done by women. It's not equal, so they are pissed and need to talk about it.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 07:06 PM
1

Sure, ok, but pretending it's the first time it happens or you're already engaged or married, it sure beats the alternatives.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 02:47 PM
2

So you're saying that the way to counter shaming is to be more alpha than the person trying to shame you? That's exactly in line with my point.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 02:46 PM
5

I don't know if that had any impact on the question at hand. Jewish women themselves preferred (or were made to prefer) Jewish men, so they still got their pick of high status partners. I think I forgot to include "no husband or unattractive husband", but that really would be a symptom of them not having enough sexual power.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 02:03 AM
7

Then you have no idea what shaming is. Think about a good, masculine father, who needs to discipline his kid because he wasn't careful and knocked over a costly piece of china. What does he do, gently tell the kid not to do it again, or sternly talk to him and make him feel ashamed of what he did? Decide what's alpha and what's beta. You are at a party with a your girlfriend and she gets a bit too drunk, starts flirting with other guys and actually flashes someone. You come back home and she's s…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 11:36 PM
7

Girls you marry and girls you fuck. Men liking the easy sex sluts give them does not mean they have respect for them, want their sisters to be like them, find nothing to cringe about and think it's good for society. Woman's correspondent are men who act like assholes. Women like having sex with psychopathic assholes, it doesn't mean they respect them as humans, they certainly don't want their brothers to behave that way, they find them morally reprehensible and if all men turned out that way, it…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 11:13 PM
1

TRP is part of the DE, and deals with men's interaction with women. The theory points to solutions an individual can apply himself, so people can actually implement them and see that they work. DE deals with societal issues, so the solutions would be a different form of government (they most often call for a regal and aristocratic-like system), but of course you can't try, test and refine those the same way you can with TRP solutions. The only way DE can change how you live is that it will allow…
/r/askTRP03/07/14 11:00 PM
38

Mmm, I'm not sure about that. Your own picture shows a lot of plain-looking feminists. My personal recipe for how to make a feminist is as follows: surplus of free time, moderate intelligence and lack of sexual power. Take a woman with a moderate level (slightly above average) of intelligence, she'll be able to distinguish men smarter than her and men dumber than her, and therefore understand that men's intelligence is contributing to their desirability. She'll see men respect other men for bein…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 10:45 PM
3

but a lot of them still have traditional lifestyle ideals about men being providers that I think border on misandry Men want sexual access, women want security and provision. All RPW is doing is discussing the same principles TRP discusses, but with a focus on what they want, i.e. an alpha male who is also a good provider. They'll talk about staying in shape and being submissive but keep in mind that their doing it for their own benefit, not ours.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 09:08 PM
12

There we go again, women treated worse than slaves. Yes, because a slave owner would normally leave his slaves at his house and give them safe domestic tasks while he himself would go out and perform the hard, laborious and dangerous ones. A slave owner would also routinely go fight and risk his life to protect his slaves, just after making sure they would not starve in case he didn't come back. And I'm pretty sure slave owners established laws making sure their slaves would never see the inside…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 08:33 PM
15

Ok, so you're a gay gender ideologue. Why do you care? You're not the target audience, your romantic prospects are not the target audience, there isn't a conspiracy to "indoctrinate" the world with red pill principles, and you already have a religion of your own, gender theory, that you follow with much fervor. Could it be you who has the cultist approach and tries to convert the infidels back to the Church of Leftism?
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 08:04 PM
12

New feminism, as a form of difference feminism, supports the idea that men and women have different strengths, perspectives, and roles, while advocating for the equal worth and dignity of both sexes. Also known as "what everyone believed before the advent of feminism". Feminism, in any form, name or denomination, is the politicization of the female complaint. Women always have and always will find something to complain about, and for better or worse, it is what has pushed our civilization forwar…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 07:45 PM
15

if all this has to do with is "the truth" (which is the rhetoric of multiple users I've seen so far), why do you need a name for yourselves or for what you're doing? You mean like the group of people who are seeking truth about the world of logic and numbers calling themselves mathematicians, the group of people seeking the truth about the physical world calling themselves scientists, the group of people seeking the truth about the realm of ideas calling themselves philosophers... Actually, yes,…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 07:27 PM
1

You completely missed the point about the modern view about what it means to communicate, how nonverbal communication is communication still and how I was not talking about fuck buddies. Try reading what I wrote again.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 11:25 PM
3

Si vis pacem, para bellum, I know. My point is that everyone thinks TRP principles are psychological warfare tactics, except those who actually apply them successfully.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 10:31 PM
4

If you're looking for a scientific study, you've come to the wrong place. We've all met a lot of people, a lot of couples, we've seen them interact and we've heard them speak. I'm saying that from my experience, when the couple says they "our relationship is great, there's a lot of communication between us", it a) is usually voiced by the woman, the man parrots it but less often and often unconvincingly, and b) the relationship gets dissolved soon after. Also from experience, the happiest and lo…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 10:28 PM
3

what's your stance on guys who'd rather be a bitch in bed? Is that Beta? Unequivocally yes. That's the very definition of beta. Here's the thing, how is TRP applicable to homosexuals? Some of it may be, other stuff isn't, but the key realization is that our human diversity, while it produces a lot of people with similar traits (called "the norm"), it also has quite a few people with traits "outside the norm". It's not a question of good and bad, but a question of quantity. The majority of women …
/r/askTRP30/06/14 10:21 PM
6

I may have been a bit harsh, I assumed you were well acquainted with RP ideas. I realize that may not be so, especially if we're having an influx of new visitors from that thread. If you're new or relatively new, I should perhaps have been more detailed. The key question to always ask is "which gender is it applicable to"? If the answer is "both", you need to find the reason why, and that reason has to be more than just about ideological principles of equality between the sexes. From that point,…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 10:10 PM
1

Preventing women from voting is a political opinion. It may not be a popular one, you may think only extremist can hold it, it is still, in essence, a political opinion. TRP is not about dictating politics, but about understanding truths about human nature, specifically as it relates to interactions between the sexes. When looking for answers, one should not be afraid to ask difficult questions. If the question is truly pointless and distasteful, the answer will reflect that. If it doesn't and y…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:46 PM
12

If people are in a loving relationship shouldn't they communicate rather than partake in psychological one-upmanship? Ah, the good old "communication". When I was inexperienced, I always thought that concept was bizarre, because as a man, I would always say what I was thinking, what I wanted and how I was feeling. Turns out that what women say they want is also what they hate. Even a red pill girlfriend will subconsciously wait for her man to figure out what she wants. The most miserable couples…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:16 PM
1

No, unless through her contact with you she stops being a feminist. There are two types of girls, those who have a realistic perspective about life and its challenges, and those who think they can go through it alone because they're strong, independent, yada yada. There are also two possible types of relationships with women: a complementary situation where you depend on one another based on your strength and weaknesses, and one where you each lead your own lives and meet just for sex. I'll let …
/r/askTRP29/06/14 08:22 PM
14

There's only an argument if you argue with her. Something very important that people who have been reading about TRP should intuitively understand, but bears clarifying. If you argue with a woman, you enter her frame. It supposes you and her are on equal footing (which you aren't, you're the leader, she's supposed to follow), and on top of that, you agree to participate in an emotional blame game. Do not do it. The concept of arguing with your woman should be as foreign as the prospect or "sleep…
/r/askTRP29/06/14 05:16 PM
11

Virginity is a consequence, a "symptom" of a girl's character, not the other way around. Since it's incredibly easy for girls to have sex, virginity is a sign that the girl is probably interested in finding a quality guy, has traditional values and won't want to hop on the next dick. The answer to your question is no, not all virgins are the same, and virginity in itself is not a guarantee of quality. The week-old freshman who never saw a naked boy in the small town she comes from, because her p…
/r/askTRP28/06/14 06:33 PM
6

Funny how the woman is not named, and no picture of her is posted. I'm guessing it's the protect the identity of the child, right? So why is revealing the identity of the mother going to reveal the identity of the child, while that of the father won't?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:04 PM
3

Same reason you use the threat of punishment to make children behave. It's much better to prevent misdeeds because they believe you'll go through with it than have to correct them. I'm assuming here the girl isn't all bad and the situation is salvageable. But this whole situation shouldn't have happened in the first place. If a man maintains his frame from the start, a girl will know when she is pushing the boundaries and should stop. If OP let it get to this point, she has the power in the rela…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 12:26 AM
2

It works differently if you're married, you can't perform the same dance and the dread game has different stakes. A divorce should arrive without warning, with hopefully enough preparation on your part to get whatever tiny leg up you can in court. I was talking purely about about girlfiends. Sure, they can try playing the victim and saying you cheated, but that's why either don't say you will be exclusive from the start or your soft next is a "break", i.e. you make it known to others that you re…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 10:03 PM
3

To me, it's not so much the 5 minutes of begging than the moodiness and argument that came later. Think about a child who doesn't get his way, him throwing a fit should be expected, but not tolerated and the child should be disciplined for it. But the kid then trying to get back at the parent? That's time for the leather belt.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 08:30 PM
4

I think we can all agree that for men, dumping = soft next to dead then hard next if it doesn't help. Women go insane if you dump them without warning, and you risk quite a bit (property damage where she'll use her pussy pass to get away from). Proper course would be giving the talk, say you're not going to tolerate that and you're not going to stand for the bullshit. If she argues, leave (if it's your place, make her leave). No contact until apology, if no apology then consider her lost.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 08:23 PM
0

You seem not to have understood a word of what I said, otherwise you'd know why your online experiences are different from interactions in the flesh, and you also wouldn't be wining about 4chan being immature. Last words on: it's really hard to ignore that there is a pattern of younger males who treat each other nicely yet treat me like crap for no reason. Not "no reason". Feminism is the reason. I also treat women harsher because I know they've been playing on "easy mode" to borrow a feminist c…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 04:25 PM
2

About your experience with a male and a female persona online: are you familiar with 4chan's "tits or gtfo"? If you aren't, I suggest you look it up on knowyourmeme, and spend a minute to think about why this rule might be in place. There was a thread here about it not too long ago, and I offered the following explanation: women want attention from men, and most men are very quick to give it, which is why threads would quickly get hijacked and derailed by women not at all interested in the topic…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 06:06 PM
5

You're assuming she's telling the truth. Look at what she says: I came out of the closet as a developer somewhat. Before I "came out", i wrote code at night after work, started submitting UI components for sale, gettin my swerve on. Translation: I heard that tech was cool and I wanted a part of that. I'm going to use the word developer, because it sounds more serious than web developer, and it's technically almost the same word. I had my preconceived notions about women coding, that's why I comp…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 06:04 PM
4

Your proposition is true, but you have to look a little deeper at what it means. Coding requires a specific way of thinking, it comes easily to some people but to others, it's almost impossible to learn. This is why getting a degree in CS will not guarantee a job. On the other hand, it's true you can get a job without a degree, but the people who do so are your standard obsessive geeks that have spent their high school years hacking at things between two video game sessions. They don't have degr…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 05:31 PM
36

Unfortunately for her, the type of alpha who wouldn't wrap it up does not have resources she can claim through the government. Her best bet would still be to go for beta bux, or if she's really good, get the alpha baby and convince beta bux it's his.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 03:45 AM
2

Like I said, I simply recalled the 30% from memory and remembered it was a yearly stat. If the CDC stats are accurate, my stat would be about women over 40. I was mainly pointing out that 30% per time is ridiculously high, the 3% you quote makes much more sense.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 08:51 PM
1

What does "76% success rate for pregnancy prevention" mean? My guess would be that it means "given a certain probability of getting pregnant, this method reduces that probability to 24% of what it was". So we are talking about completely different measures.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 08:45 PM
3

I'm not sure it's that low. It still leaves plenty of room for constant pregnancies. After 2 years, 10% of women will have become pregnant both years. Also, the figure is assuming intercourse at a rate of about 3 times a week, seeing as the fertility window is a few days, changing it to intercourse every day significantly increases that percentage, and can easily explain very frequent pregnancies.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 09:58 PM
7

I'm even questioning the 30% in one try, according to you'd need only have sex 10 times to have a >99% probability of conceiving. The figure I remember is a 30% chance of conceiving per year for women under 30 when they don't use any protection.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 09:19 PM
4

Meh, RP doesn't mean uber alpha who always holds his frame and never makes mistakes. We're here because we're not perfect, because we had to learn. I can be very beta sometimes, but I know enough not to show any emotional weakness in front of women, especially when it has to do with another woman.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 03:21 PM
-1

And he's the example that confirms the rule. The lesson: TRP is about trends and generalizations, which means the rules apply most of the time, but it also means there are quite a few exceptions out there.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 03:09 PM
1

It's probably all about the attitude. OP is RP, so when he mentioned the divorce it probably went "yeah, got divorced, whatever" instead of the very beta "sob, I just got though a difficult divorce, I'm not sure if I'm ready to date again, I need some time". An who did the rejecting is only one aspect of it, divorce is a tough experience, a man who can mention it with confidence is showing his strength of character.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 03:07 PM
2

I don't think they are turned on by the talk itself. It looks like women do this to exploit the human weakness and concern for innocent children. The whole "this is cute" feeling is what inspires us to protect the weak, baby-talk is a shield women use so we want to forgive them everything and anything. What this one doesn't seem to realize is that it has its limit, and a public display of it is already way over that limit.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 02:09 AM
2

A relationship where the woman is the boss of the man rarely works. It was a mistake to hire him, his behavior shows he resents you for it. He read a bit of TRP, and didn't realize that to be the leader and worthy of respect, he has to show something for it. He's handling it the worst way possible, by being a crybaby and hoping you'll break. I've seen a very similar situation play in front of my eyes, and I know there really is only possible outcome: for you to end things. He's basically demandi…
/r/askTRP15/06/14 08:10 PM
10

But there are things in life you just can't say Precisely, just like astronomers used to not be able to say the Earth was in orbit around the Sun. Leftists firmly believe that our time is so different from the past because of the unrestricted freedom of thought. Nothing could be further from the truth. The only thing that has changed is the official belief, the mechanism is the same.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 08:36 PM
13

The cat is out of the bag, nearly doubling supply of labor has driven wages down, no economist should be be surprised, yet stating this fact is blasphemy. So how does this fit with TRP? Well, women wanted choice, it's time for men to have some too. Our newfound choice is weather we want to support our woman (notice I didn't say wife, never let the law have a hold on you) and let her be a housewife, or force her to work her fair share. If you have a good, well-paying job that you like, you can ch…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 07:12 PM
5

If you look on the left share banner, the reddit icon and arrows refer directly to this post. Publicity doesn't get any more direct than that.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 11:14 PM
13

The precedents are of men who were sperm donors without going through the banks and fertility clinics. Especially gay men with lesbian friends who agreed to provide the sperm so one of the women can impregnate herself. The legal argument was that because they did not go through official channels, they couldn't be treated differently from men who impregnate women by having sex with them. Moral of the story: NEVER accept to be a sperm donor for a woman you know. If you still want to donate sperm b…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:01 PM
11

So it's no longer a few isolated incidents anymore, it's becoming a pattern. And since we've really only fully shifted to electronic means of communication and record-keeping a decade ago, this will be on the rise as more "compromising" information is easily available, and impossible to fully destroy. Using public outrage over distasteful and politically incorrect words have been used to discredit political opponents forever. The disturbing part is that it's now a) much easier to access private …
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 04:05 PM
23

No downvotes, I completely believe that the dynamic described in abusive relationships is real and documented. The problem is the interpretation, and especially the decision of what to do. You said it yourself, you didn't want to leave your wife, even when everybody was telling you to, so what exactly do we expect society to do? Force someone to get out against their wishes? What would you have wished society did for you when you were in that situation? Humans respond to strength and seek out va…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 05:39 PM
3

Think of frame as the person's mental state that influences how they think about and interact with the world. Let's see some examples. A stand up comedian should have a comical frame. To him, everything should be a joke, when he's looking for new material, and he has to keep that frame on stage and actually bring his audience into that frame. An effective drill sergeant should have a serious frame. The best way for him to keep his recruits in line is to make sure that when they are around him, t…
/r/askTRP20/05/14 01:04 AM
2

Of course he would, how could it be any other way? There's always going to be a dominant party, and in a case of cuckolding, it has to be the alpha bull, there wouldn't be any cuckolding otherwise. I'm not saying I'm sure this is all caused by some parasite, just that it would not conflict with observed dynamics.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 04:26 PM
5

I remember reading about this parasite that affects the minds of rodents. Normally, the males are protective of their females, but under the influence of this parasite, they push them to mate with other males. This parasite is sexually transmissible, so the theory is of course that it is an evolutionary adaptation on its part, to spread more effectively. It hasn't been found in humans, but it's not like people were looking for it, so some cuckold fetish may have biological causes.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 04:15 PM
3

What else would I be if not red pill?
/r/askTRP17/05/14 05:01 PM
1

Nowhere, I just wrote it. Just wanted to separate the direct answer to your question from more general advice.
/r/askTRP16/05/14 11:13 PM
2

You know how almost every single comedian uses some variant of a joke involving women holding a grudge and remembering your mistakes for years? You want to avoid that, and in order to do so you should never completely abdicate, even if you're completely wrong. The effect you want is that she still sees you as the strong leader she wants to follow, that she knows angering you has a price that she really doesn't want to pay, and that you are just. That's why I said, "be a good master". You can hug…
/r/askTRP16/05/14 10:22 PM
18

The post was written by a guest blogger but the veracity of every aspect of the story has been verified by Blogger Clarissa. So it still stands. "Clarissa" signed off on "every aspect of the story", which reasonably includes all the observable differences between men and women, yet she just can't accept someone else saying it.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 09:54 PM
4

The alpha way is to not show emotions. If you're in the wrong, firmly and calmly say "I realize this was uncalled for, I apologize for hurting your feelings". Don't start whimpering, don't make yourself look weak, just admit your mistake and comfort her if she needs to. But be wary that your reaction "damn that was fucked up" may not necessarily mean you were wrong or that you went too far, just that her cries made you feel sorry for her. That's emotional manipulation, likely subconscious but it…
/r/askTRP16/05/14 09:44 PM
2

Let's see They distract you from the real world and provide a manufactured proxy for the feelings you're supposed to get from actual life. The exact same thing can be said about books, movies, theatre, opera, music concerts and really any sensorially immersive activity. To a degree, going to an art gallery and staring at painting can also have that effect. That's what art is: it provides us a distraction from the real world and stimulates the imagination. They take energy, but return none. It's …
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 10:45 PM
104

Simple rule: a girl who lies about her past deserves to be lied to about her future. You can string her along, not make promises and if she wants signs of commitment, just use the same cop-outs she uses for her past. "The future is the future, all that matters is us in the present".
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 04:27 PM
29

It's even more than that. Bossy operates under the perfect pairing assumption (AKA The One). Somewhere out there is that perfect match, you just need to go though many many guys to "find yourself" and you'll know he's The One when your feelings make you want to settle down with him (i.e. your subconscious is sensing the Wall) AND he's ok with that DickQuest™ of yours, because it led you to him.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 04:08 PM
4

It's incredibly disrespectful to me and to her, but some guys just have no class. It's surely low class, but I'm not sure I see the disrespect. They have history together, you know that when you start getting involved with that girl, denying the facts strikes me as even worse. The real issue is that their lack of tact reflects poorly on the woman's choice of men.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 03:56 PM
52

"I love sluts" is the man's fitness test equivalent to "I want a nice guy". You only want to exploit people with that trait, while simultaneously using it as a disqualifying indicator of low value. The difference is women do it completely subconsciously, once again men need to learn it the hard way.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 03:52 PM
3

(Religious based) chasteness warps their view of sexuality to the point where normal relations usually aren't possible after marriage. Chastity is great, to a point. There are a few problems with this kind of chastity. First, it used to be the norm, but it is now outside the norm. Women have a much stronger push to conformity than men (easy to see who follows fashions, trends, who gossips about "abnormal" behavior), so unless they are part of very religious communities where every girl saves her…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 12:16 AM
7

There is room for societal conscience, but you have to be realistic in what can be achieved. We don't live in a village of a few hundreds, we are part of a very large society that is overtly opposed to going back to some previous arrangement. Then, there's the number game. Women's hypergamy and their roles as gatekeepers of sex work hand in hand. Suppose we do indeed live in a village of 100 men and 100 women. If you impose monogamy, everyone pairs off at their level and no one is left behind. R…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 08:30 PM
5

I'm sure it does, and I'm sure you think your family members are good people who do the right thing. Here are the facts though: cops are given almost complete immunity from prosecution, and the internal investigation process only gets them if they compromise the organization itself, not if they mistreat citizens. Saying "most of them are not like that" doesn't change the fact that I don't feel safe around cops because I know they have the ability to fuck me over, for no reason, and without any r…
/r/PussyPass12/05/14 03:51 PM
4

Assuming they have a duty to respond to an emergency call in the first place. The courts have ruled police officers are not legally obliged to do so. Sure it's their job, but they can slack at it as much as any other unionized worker. It's like if we were criticizing starbucks baristas and saying they make shitty coffee, then you come and post a picture threatening to not make coffee on time. Like that's going to sway my opinion.
/r/PussyPass12/05/14 03:39 PM
5

Unmarried couples should have similar legal protections as those who are married, Britain’s top family judge has said Translation: unmarried women should have similar legal access to their partner's money as those who are married, said someone who would get more clients if this came to pass.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 08:00 PM
38

Being alpha is about controlling the frame, about pulling other people into your frame, is it not? Well if someone does a prank like that, their frame is that the prank is funny. People laughing means they have accepted your frame. When Cruise was done, did you find the prank funny? Did you think the interviewer was rude? Maybe you didn't, but everyone present, including the interviewer who made the prank felt uncomfortable and thought squirting water was rude and not funny. That means Cruise su…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 07:47 PM
41

Good for cops that the primary aggressor doctrine isn't used for anything else than domestic disputes. Under it, a cop killer would always be in the right, since cops are better trained and better equipped. I stopped caring about cops getting killed a long time ago.
/r/PussyPass07/05/14 04:49 PM
9

It's true, the point is guys don't care much about what the dude in the porn scene looks like, and that's why hot men could be introduced without any complaint from the viewers. Men only care that the women be hot. Women on the other hand the guys to be hot and the girls to be as/less attractive than them.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 01:29 AM
91

Men's sexual attractiveness is derived from their status, wealth and athleticism, all of which can be improved upon. When men see an attractive man, they want to (and usually can, if they work hard enough) be him. Women's sexual attractiveness is derived from their youth and their physical appearance, both of which they can only deteriorate. When women see an attractive woman, they want her out of the competition. Hence guys won't mind seeing studs in porn (unless they have a particular fantasy …
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 08:07 PM
1

True, I hadn't interpreted it like that. In this case, it works even better, some guys don't care if a girl is "taken", but few will persist after being told the girl is not interested in men.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 03:00 PM
2

The gist of it is: If it benefitted all men, it wasn't linked to feminism. If was linked to feminism, it did not benefit all men. If it benefitted all men and was linked to feminism, it was not true.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 12:42 AM
3

And the examples given... For #2, it cites a WSJ article that doesn't cite anything, claiming the opposite of what every study on the subject says. For #3, the only example they could find was a drinking age discrepancy, and it's not like they decreased the age for men, they increased it for women!
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 12:39 AM
7

R Sam of Sri Ram Nagar near Podanur, and the girl were in love and he had promised to marry her. According to the prosecution, he took the girl to Kodaikanal in 2007 and raped her several times after giving her soft drinks laced with sedatives. Something doesn't quite sit right here. So did he rape her because it was sex under false pretense, or because he deliberately drugged her? And if she was in love and ready to give it up for a promise, why even bother with the sedatives? It looks like the…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:01 AM
6

Feminists want to only be hit on by guys they find attractive, and for the rest of men to be at their service and provide emotional comfort, chivalry and even gifts. Actually, most women want that but only feminists are delusional enough to think they can enshrine it in law.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:57 PM
10

Not exactly. Women pretend men can't handle rejection, while the truth is they handle it even worse, it's only that they aren't required to initiate like men do. So most of the time, no excuse is needed since no interaction will happen if the man doesn't like the woman, but when the interaction does indeed happen and is initiated by the woman, even a nice let down like "I have a girlfriend" won't prevent the accusations of misogyny or "being gay".
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:55 PM
21

It's not just being expelled, you are not refunded the tuition paid, and tuitions are steep, so you could easily compare this to a legal fine. But most importantly, such an expulsion stays on your record, with "sexual assault" or even "rape" right next to it. I don't know how this plays out in real life, but I would assume it makes your acceptance to another college much more difficult if not impossible. A college expulsion for rape is basically a sentence that makes you lose time, money and the…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 11:40 PM
11

Sperm is pretty resilient, it can survive a few days at body temperature and probably even an hour at room temperature. That said, the chances of a woman successfully impregnating herself with a used condom are slim, but it has happened, so if you want to be safe, dispose of it.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 09:05 PM
3

It's the apex fallacy again. Marriage used to be about political alliances and financial gain for the top members of those societies, for the common people it was a way to make them responsible before they inevitably start making babies.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 04:44 PM
5

No, it hasn't been men's job since liberal politicians like him a) pushed the idea women are just as capable as men in every sphere and b) made any informal fight something you can bring up in a court of law. Not only is he advocating violence, he's advocating for an erosion of the rule of law, and if any man follows his advice that man will land in jail. Yes indeed, this isn't very "vice-presidential of him".
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:17 AM
8

On the contrary, rape was taken quite seriously. It's just that pre-marital sex was not accepted, and people weren't fucking in frat houses right next to their roommates, so this situation would not have been possible. It was simple: if you were married, the sex was consensual (you said so on your wedding night) and if not, you were either an adulterer or rapist/rape victim. It was quite easy to distinguish the two: if it couldn't be shown that the woman took steps to engage in the sex (going to…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 03:59 PM
8

So he's quoting a bunch of statements from RoK, and his supremely intellectual method of disproving them is simply to post gifs of people saying "no". 13 for example: what is he saying no to? That American women are taught to be big-mouther, rude and disrespectful? That they're like that period? That Japanese women are more feminine? What is his point?
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 05:40 PM
3

But than again, in the past rape was still an accepted way of producing kids. Not really. Unless by rape you mean "woman regrets it the next morning".
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 09:31 PM
4

Nice of you to go all metaphysical on it, a far cry from your original argument. Separating the act from the underlying reasons may have some intellectual value, but that's not how reality works. You could just as well say that someone providing insider trading information is "just telling the truth" to someone else, and we should dissociate the act of telling from the underlying motivations and reasons for telling, as well as the material consequences of divulging this information. A nice intel…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 07:15 PM
14

It's just skin mashing together. Really? Am I really on TRP? No, sex is not just skin mashing together, if it was you wouldn't care whether your girlfriend had 300 guys before you or just one. Unless you can really say with absolute honesty that you would be ok with an open relationship with a girl where she can go fuck anyone she wants and that knowing she was being plowed by an entire football team does not make you flinch, you yourself do not really believe that sex is "just skin mashing toge…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 05:24 PM
3

That's not my point. Sex as an activity has a different value to most humans than other activities, deciding to do it as a job does not change that fact. If you fix stuff up around the house for your woman, you won't get jealous if she hires a professional to do it. Can you say the same thing about hiring a male prostitute?
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 05:18 PM
34

If you feel that way about sex, great. Can I borrow your wife? Most people see sex as a very intimate thing, something you share with a chosen person and which that person only shares with you. Men value chastity in their partners even more than women, but most women still don't like the idea of their man having sex with others. If you think giving a blowjob to a friend's husband is "no different" than cooking a meal for him, then the implication is that a horny man raping a woman really is "no …
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 04:22 PM
8

There's so much wrong in this article that it's not possible to respond completely. But let's stick to the glaring points. In the conclusion, the authors suggest "policies that would increase the number and quality of jobs available to working class men". If that's not liberal wishful thinking with no basis in reality, what exactly are they proposing? We've been hearing about the "mancession" for a while, and the resounding cry from feminists has been "focus on women! let men figure it out on th…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 09:37 PM
9

This suggests a double standard of aging in which men devalue women as they age, but women do not judge men by age. This may be because women are judged more on looks than men, and men employ a standard of beauty in which youth is seen as more attractive Does anyone else sense the butthurt? They couldn't help spinning this as some sort or failing on the part of men in an otherwise objective analysis of the data.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 08:17 PM
3

One of the fundamental things TRP teaches is that as a man, if you want something, you have to take the initiative to get it. A Woman see a man and asks "how can he improve my life?" The MGTOW response is "but how can you improve mine?" The red pill man doesn't answer with a question, he lets the woman know what he wants from her and leaves if she doesn't follow. I understand the need for MGTOW, and I know it will continue to grow until the culture shifts and the average woman is not a pain in t…
/r/MGTOW22/04/14 05:30 PM
2

That's a pretty defeatist perspective. You're addressing this to redpillers, so you must understand that the type of guy who knows dread game can also make sure his wife does not get fat and recovers well after a pregnancy. It sounds like you are more concerned with women losing their attractiveness after a baby than you are about false fears of cuckoldry.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 04:40 PM
7

I was obviously ignoring the married RPW, since those are not the ones "available on the market". It's true that the majority of your posters already have a man, but I would guess most of your lurkers are women looking for a guy, and that's what I've described. The accusation of solipsism and self-interest still stands, but that's ok, I'm red pill and I also believe in me > my family > my tribe. The rest of the world can burn for all I care, it doesn't care about me nor is interested in listenin…
/r/MGTOW22/04/14 04:32 PM
1

I have a quite a few friends who are professionally very confident. Among coworkers or people in the same industry, they are supremely alpha, they're loud, they're the center of attention, they're cracking jokes and being a playful dick to everyone around, typical AMOG behavior. But around girls, they retract back to an absolute beta mode: fall over themselves to look "nice", say how much of a feminist they are, pedestalize and are obviously completely unsuccessful. And it looks like Louis C.K. …
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 04:11 PM
1

What I remember was that, while the children of two homosexual parents fared better than children of single parents, they did slightly better than children of heterosexual parents (not by much, but it was statistically significant). Children of married parents also tended to do better than children of unmarried parents.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 03:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter