TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sweetleef Archive

View 0 posts and 554 comments by sweetleef on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Of course she should, but she wasn't. And he couldn't do anything to change that. The woman was malevolent and abusive, but she was their only mother. How they view their mother will shape how they view themselves, and their relationship with her will define their development. That's a very interesting point you raise, though. The only thing he could do, maybe, was to make the kids hate him less by making them hate her more, but he hurt himself to avoid that. Is that better overall for them? Or …
/r/TheRedPill13/01/21 02:08 PM
2

Maybe he was sacrificing himself to save you from her. Sacrificing yourself for what you believe (rightly or wrongly) to be a threat to your childrens' well-being doesn't seem to be BP. Sacrificing out of weakness, or fear, or neediness, sure - but to protect your children seems quite different.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/21 01:51 PM
3

She told me she has “been through a lot” It'd be a good bet that every woman on Earth has used that line in a relationship at some point.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/20 09:39 AM
3

You have two options: either surrender (and spending your time mentally anguishing over it without doing anything is the same as surrendering), or do something to defeat it. Identify a source of your weakness, then set a goal toward removing it, then act on it. If money is your weakness, make more money. You don't have to become Trump overnight, but set some goal and work towards it. Learn a new skill, look for a better job, learn about divorce law, learn more about investing, read about how ric…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/20 09:32 AM
6

Stop thinking, start acting. You can't think your way to success, you have to act. Set some goal, doesn't matter what it is, then work to accomplish it. When you do, set the next goal. Repeat.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/20 09:14 AM
6

It's very common, you're definitely not alone. There are thousands of posts here about oneitis, for a reason. The quickest cure for it is to find more women. When you find enough, you'll realize that there's nothing special or unique or irreplaceable about any of them. Then you'll eventually realize that you don't need any of them.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/20 09:10 AM
16

She'll never fully commit to you, no matter what you do. If you want true commitment, get friends, a dog, children (most of the time), but don't expect it from a woman, ever.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/20 09:02 AM
48

Recognizing her fundamental nature isn't manipulating her. Is it manipulating her to take a shower so she isn't disgusted by your stench? Is it manipulating to have money so she isn't repelled by you being a loser? Of course not. Neither is avoiding being needy and weak.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/20 08:56 AM
1

Because they don't want you to improve in life, they don't want you aware. They want you weak and subservient. They want to control you, your thoughts, your speech, your job, and everywhere else.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/20 05:28 PM
8

Why wouldn't they? They just banned The_Donald, with over 7 million.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/20 05:26 PM
12

The site banner says "where facts don't matter" - apparently a bad Babylon Bee ripoff, without the humor or wit.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/20 05:38 PM
3

Female porn stars don't get paid for sex - they get paid to pretend they want sex.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/19 10:04 PM
1

Emotions are impulses to further survival. Anger to motivate you to fight, fear to motivate you to escape danger, happiness when you're safe from danger, etc. In general, a woman's emotions toward a man are no different - she feels positive emotion toward what will better her chances of survival. It's not robotic, it's 4 billion years of instinct, for men and women both.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/19 10:22 PM
1

Physical, confident, and secure = better able to dominate others in the tribe, protect her from predators, and control resources which she can then enjoy. Even if he isn't providing right now, he has a higher capacity to provide. The traits they look for in men are those that are conducive to domination/provision/protection, which she can gain by association. In general, they won't be attracted to a weak loser with no prospects, no matter how confident he is.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/19 08:48 PM
7

Depends on whether she thinks she can get the committment without the sex, and on the value of the committment. If she knows you're waiting on her and won't ditch, or you're low value, she'll put it off. With an A-list actor, the SMV is so high that just stooping to bang her is enough committment to trigger the sex response.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/19 04:24 PM
7

I want women to get wet for ME. They're never getting wet for you, they're getting wet for the status you give her by associating with you, or for the resources she can acquire through you, or the protection she'd gain from you, etc. Prostitution just simplifies the exchange.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/19 08:57 PM
16

Available 24 hours a day, affordably, everywhere, in convenient packaging.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/19 06:58 PM
1

I've traveled quite a bit, all over Europe, far eastern Asia, parts of S. America - which has led to my conclusion that there's more than enough to see and do in America, with far less hassle and danger. The only country worth another visit is Italy, which is extraordinarily beautiful.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/19 09:19 AM
1

Haha, facts. You cite some bullshit popularity ranking by some unknown marketing agency, and bullshit from the useless America-hating UN, then some lifespan statistics. None of that proves that America is "better" or "worse" than your irrelevant country. We get it, you're bitter and jealous, you hate America. Join the club. Nobody gives a shit, least of all Americans.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/19 04:55 PM
2

That's the american way of looking at vacations. We go to some place to look at something. The rest of the world travels to experience other cultures. That's the pretentious douchebag way of looking at vacations - to presume to know the motivations and thoughts of 350 million fucking people, much less 7 billion globally. And the pretentious douchebag way of looking at America is to not understand that it's full of different cultures, that each region is distinct, and with as much variety as you'…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/19 12:51 PM
2

If Americans don't have passports, it's because they don't need them. America is huge and has all types of territory and landscapes - there's plenty to see and do without leaving the country. No reason to fly to austria to look at mountains when we have the Rockies, no reason to go to some 3rd world shithole to look at the ocean when we have both. And anything else you could find in any other country. As for your rankings, if they put SF at the top of US cities, it's clearly bullshit, probably f…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/19 10:25 AM
20

Until robots have social standing, or have the capacity to be rich, they won't be interesting to women.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/19 05:54 PM
6

There's no upside for the cops/prosecutor to contradict the woman. They lose the conviction, give the media an angle to attack, open the door for lawsuits, and invite meetoo lunatics to use them as prey for their stunts. And there's no penalty for going after the guy, rightly or wrongly.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 10:51 AM
1

"There" refers to the prior story and/or post about it. "Here" refers to the present discussion in this thread. Either would be perfectly fine, but pedantic douchebag grammar-naziing generally isn't.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 10:48 AM
22

Women start the relationship hoping the man will change, but he doesn't. Men start the relationship hoping the woman won't change, but she does. - unknown
/r/TheRedPill14/01/19 01:33 PM
5

Agree with the second sentence, but not the first - being a woman's slave doesn't make you a better person, it only weakens and demoralizes you further.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/18 03:23 PM
5

Have you ever been the subject of a global media attack, 2 billion people reading about how you're a piece of shit animal "rapist", reporters hounding you and protesters screeching everywhere you go, then be put in front of cameras with the whole world hanging on your every word? Have you spent your entire life trying to do good, trying follow the rules, excelling at everything through tons of hard work over decades, only to have it all demolished by obviously ridiculous lies and abysmal stupidi…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/18 04:25 PM
1

Should've stayed in the fort and looked on from the walls with disdain/disappointment. And if she keeps doing it? If she gets away with it once, guaranteed she'll keep upping the defiance level. The point is that the child is the one hurt by the undermining of the father and the conflicting guidance - that has to be prevented, and if glaring at her doesn't stop it, what then?
/r/MarriedRedPill11/09/18 09:32 AM
3

That her purpose is not to share her day-to-day life with a man, but to invest time into an endeavor with an eventual payout. The goal is not the relationship itself, but the end reward for enduring the relationship.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/18 05:39 PM
14

“You wasted 2 months of my life” Think about that statement. The implication is that simply being with you and spending time with you is not the goal, she derives no pleasure or happiness from it - she's with you merely to achieve some profit, namely, committment of some kind for her provision. When that promise of provision is cut off, the time spent with you becomes "wasted".
/r/TheRedPill12/06/18 04:53 PM
3

Women's empowerment doesn't preclude men from having the same. Agree with most of your comment, except the above. Or maybe it's a confusion of what "empowerment" means. Under the current scheme, "empowerment" seems to mean women serving in male roles and changing the rules to accomodate the women, only. A government that wants to focus on "equality" must handicap or weaken men in some way in order to boost women who wouldn't otherwise have had the capacity to operate on a male level in male role…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/18 05:23 PM
4

Deciding, on anything, means accepting responsibility in case things don't work out. Her opposition isn't to the activity, it's to being put in a position where she might be responsible. By framing it as done decision she can accept, she can blame any failure completely on you, while spinning success as a result of her choosing to follow along.
/r/MarriedRedPill15/03/18 02:22 PM
6

Nice idea, but harder in reality. The "tingles" are a mechanism for pursuing the goal, namely, to secure the committment. Once the committment is secure, no more need for "tingles" - talk to men who've been married for a few years, or who've had kids, the stories are distressingly similar.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/18 07:00 PM
1

Women have always utilized that bizarre rationale. The difference now is that the media and the legal system are catering to it.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 08:24 PM
3

Even more illogical: if the drunk woman, 2 minutes after having sex that she couldn't legally consent to, gets behind the wheel and kills someone, her responsibility for her actions magically reappears, and she can be prosecuted for DUI murder/manslaughter.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/17 07:32 PM
4

Women are all different, Found the woman in the thread.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 02:15 PM
4

"[to intervjuer] Past exes have been mean to me" Never met a woman who didn't have an "abusive past relationship" story to some degree or another. They can't distinguish between emotional state and reality, are completely self-centered, and avoid personal responsibility at all costs. So once the relationship fails they have to justify it by concocting a negative depiction of the guy - if they feel bad it's because someone else caused it so the guy must be bad, if the relationship failed it's bec…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 05:51 PM
15

No, you won't change their nature. They'll go as far as they're allowed to go. Unfortunately, we've set up institutional rules that allow them to go much further than they should, discrimination laws, divorce and custody rules, campus rape courts, media hysteria, etc. - these things are extremely difficult to modify once installed, so getting back to the sane point would be a very long process.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 05:42 PM
10

No matter what you do, or don't do, you can be "accused" of it, which carries stigma, cost, and reputation destruction equivalent to being convicted. And even if she pleads for sex in front of a notary, with her hand on the Bible, they can argue that the consent was retroactively withdrawn, so it's still rape.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/17 08:11 AM
2

Harassing and following women around like a creep isn't okay. Thanks for telling us that. What would all us morons do if we didn't have enlightened champions to lecture us on the obvious.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/17 08:03 AM
31

Retroactive withdrawal of consent. Checkmate, shitlord.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/17 07:56 AM
10

[–]LawyerInTheMaking im too busy trying to get my body right, my education set, and chase paper. Get yourself a bluetooth phone headset and a really big silver watch, and the caricature will be complete. For bonus points, make sure to refer to "bottle service" and "billables" at least once per conversation.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/17 11:11 AM
1

True, but it's more than that - all types of men from morons to geniuses fall into the same trap. Didn't Elon Musk fall for it twice with the same woman? There's some emotional mechanism that causes guys to self-destruct in this way over and over.
/r/MarriedRedPill14/09/17 08:26 PM
2

I thought there was a word limit on reddit posts.... don't have 2 hours to read it all. One thing's clear - if you're rambling and weeping that much on anonymous message boards, you don't have enough friends in your life. Go make some, find a few guys that aren't weak pussywhipped emotional trainwrecks, and get their take on this.
/r/MarriedRedPill14/09/17 08:10 PM
1

The trigger for the emotional Achilles Heel that men have that causes them to get hooked by women long enough to sign the marriage contract.
/r/MarriedRedPill14/09/17 08:06 PM
4

Lack of foresight, inability to defer pleasure, self-centeredness, lack of perspective and education, constant false assurances from media, disdain and disrespect for others, etc., etc.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 02:32 PM
5

No idea about reliability of "big brother" - but huffington post is definitely not reliable, no matter what it's measured against.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/17 12:26 PM
3

lure women into your facade and have meaningless sex with them, most likely ending in emotional distress for the woman. This shows an ignorance of "red pill philosphy," and a severely dismissive view of women. The hapless women are "lured" by the dishonest brutes and duped into giving away sex without a suitable return. They are incapable of deciding for themselves what they want to do, and incapable of enjoying sex as sex - instead they exchange it for a "meaningful" return such as "marriage an…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 05:46 PM
1

Women aren't attracted to appearance alone, they're attracted to status and wealth. If attractiveness significantly increases them, it could be sufficient. If the guy has status and wealth for other reasons, appearance is meaningless.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 04:31 PM
3

The only difference from 1929 is that technology and more sophisticated management allowed them to keep the banks in business and avoid a total lockup through various schemes, QE, ZIRP, TARP, etc. At best, they've stretched out the correction period, and we're following Japan's lead through neverending recession; at worst, they've only multiplied the force of the real crash when it comes.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 03:05 PM
1

What does the edgy bernout ranting have to do with his parents being happily married? Is your argument that the reason they stayed married for 50 years was because they had a better pension plan?
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 02:46 PM
58

Money won't buy attraction In your example, a dinner won't buy sex - because she's not starving and she can get another sucker to buy it tomorrow. If the exact same boring guy had had a private jet waiting to take them to a mansion in the Bahamas, the result would've been much different.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/17 12:52 PM
3

AWALT. It's repeated again and again for a reason.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/17 05:56 PM
1

Combine their celebrity and money/power, then rank in descending order. That's it. All the TRP fetish subjects like looks and grooming and muscularity are only pertinent to the extent they affect one of those two factors.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 06:35 PM
4

That strategy works perfectly in Internet-toughguy-land, where there are no time constraints or other obligations competing for time, and where there are infinite attractive, available women patiently waiting in line for their chance to perform for OP at no cost.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 12:23 PM
4

There was an air-raid siren and a gigantic neon sign with a flashing arrow pointing at the mine.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/17 01:39 PM
31

really fucked for weed? I could understand coke or maybe some pills Yeah that would make it better, LOL.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/17 04:42 PM
28

she isn't in the wrong here, you just had faulty expectations. That depends on your definition of "in the wrong" - Whoring herself for drugs might be considered a bit unbecoming, and deliberately doing it in front of a weak beta that just professed his love for her, her getting off on making him suffer, is certainly sadistic and cruel. Just because he wrongly expected her not to be a meanspirited whore doesn't justify her being a meanspirited whore.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/17 04:37 PM
3

I admire your optimism. Actually, I'd say it needs to be broken up - with respect to women in general life, work, non-romantic family, school, etc., your percentage sounds about right. With respect to women vis-a-vis a sexual partner, within the romantic context, it would be zero.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/17 05:16 PM
9

yeah he did waste her youth Think about the underlying perversity of that statement - the whole concept is based on the premise that the woman has spent time with the man for the sole purpose of eventually receiving the payoff of a marriage. So she wasn't with him because she enjoyed sharing time and experiences with him, she wasn't benefitting from his presence during that period, her time was an investment that was "wasted" because she didn't get the ring (and more importantly, the financial c…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 06:16 PM
4

Once you internalize the concept that you can only be responsible for your own opinions and actions, you can free yourself from the guilt. You didn't force her to do anything - you presented your opinion, but how she interpreted that opinion, and what she chose to do, was not in your control. You might benefit from reading the works of Epictetus and his followers. My condolences, and best of luck to you.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/17 11:27 PM
4

Simply acting is 10% of success - the other 90% is doing it again and again and again after every failure. There's no magic secret, success is just never giving up - and most people give up very early.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/17 11:16 PM
5

Should rename it to "AdolescentPhilosopy" - we can have a sidebar for all the coming-of-age epiphany rants and links to Fast n Furious movies.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/16 11:56 AM
7

don't think a robot can beat sex with a real woman Of course not - but on a cost/benefit basis, they've made the benefits of "real women" very fucking costly. In addition to the traditional hoops to jump through, in the past few decades they've added societal encouragement of slut behaviour and denigration of males, along with the russian roulette aspects of fashionable "rape" accusations, completely one-sided judicial systems/divorce rape, and the risk of lifetime slavery in the case of pregnan…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/16 08:04 AM
30

As usual, the entire rant could be summarized without any loss of meaning, by: "ME ME ME ME ME!"
/r/TheRedPill08/09/16 12:39 PM
7

This woman is honestly being nicer than others out there. This part is true - many (most?) of them would've cleaned the omega out before telling him to fuck off. These guys are good for years of gifts, car repairs, tuition, dinners, etc. I've even heard of omega types being used for rides back/forth to booty calls at the chad's house. Imagine the thrill these women get from the idea of the frustrated cuck sitting outside crying in the car while she's getting hammered by chad.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/16 04:12 PM
-1

Best part is yet to come - when the chad gets bored of her snatch and dumps her, she'll run first to mr. omega here, crying about being "abused" or "raped" and telling him how much she needs him, with the goal to get him riled up enough to confront the chad and "avenge her honor". The optimal outcome would be a physical confrontation where chad destroys omega, in front of her gaggle of friends.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/16 03:54 PM
3

Red Pill, as I understand it anyway, is not synonymous with "narcissist".
/r/TheRedPill18/06/16 03:44 PM
6

Playing on the protector/provider instinct is one half of the strategy, the other half being sex. Those are the only 2 things they can use.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/16 10:36 AM
0

Kell Brook is 5'9" at welterweight - he isn't George Foreman, but not exactly "skinny" either.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/16 10:31 AM
5

Hot, sane, smart. Pick any two.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 01:33 PM
7

Just in case, note there's also a bit of difference between Cosmology and Cosmetology.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 01:28 PM
7

numerous police reports of domestic violence throughout their relationship This may be true, or you may be making it up completely - but even if there are "police reports," even a short amount of reading TRP should alert you to the fact that "police reports of domestic violence" frequently have nothing to do with any actual "abuse".
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 02:30 PM
13

If it floats, fucks, or flies, it's cheaper to rent.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/16 07:12 PM
2

Why do you believe I'm apathetic? Did I say I was depressed? I do wish to conquer life, but not women. Don't care for girls. that's all. So you rant on and on how life is "meaningless", nobody cares or remembers anything, and nothing has value - then you want to conquer it? It's nonsensical. You can't conquer the "meaningless", and just by writing page after page of this self-congratulatory bullshit you're imparting meaning onto it. I read this thread way past my usual tolerance looking for some…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/16 01:32 PM
0

You should try less childish insults and more thinking. I didn't say "betabucks" or "ultimate provider", I said the guy with power. That power may manifest in various ways, from your convict with physical power, or your musician who has power in the form of attention/adulation, or your businessman with power in the form of money. They are attracted to that power and will provide sex as a means to attach themselves to it. They are not attracted by sex, alone, for sex's sake. If they were, there'd…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/16 04:13 PM
0

And who is the "alpha"? The guy with power. Power to feed, protect, and elevate her above her peers. She will perform sex to entice that man, and to keep him coming back for more. Once the "alpha" loses his power, he's useless to her and the "desire" ends. If he signals that she can get the benefits of the power without sex, the need to perform is eliminated and the "desire" ends.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/16 03:41 PM
-1

They don't desire any man. They desire what a man can provide. If the man they "desire" stops being able to provide, he's dumped like trash and it's on to the next guy who can (or promises to).
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 10:19 PM
12

They are attracted to SMV (i.e., power) - if physical features increases SMV, then it's beneficial to attraction. If the guy has sufficient power apart from physique, then it doesn't matter. A billionaire could be a balding, obese hunchback with cystic acne and still have any woman he wanted.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 06:33 PM
4

if there is ever a situation where being with the other hinders their ability to experience life, they do it anyways without guilt. Talk is cheap, and a woman will say anything that makes it more likely he'll commit. Before the commitment she's a sex fiend, loving and attentive to his needs, open-minded and trusting, etc. - but once he's locked in the gloves come off and all that stuff disappears. Ask any married man. Hypothetically, he's free to do all kinds of things. But if he actually does e…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 07:51 PM
7

Do not count on her. Her only job in life is to get pregnant. Remember that. A friend recently got trapped - he'd just had a bad breakup, and lo and behold out of nowhere comes a past LTR to provide him "comfort" in his time of need. The old LTR is basically a single loser on the very far side of the wall and had apparently just been waiting for her opportunity to strike. She got him drunk, assured him she was on the pill, and from a single night of "comforting", boom she's pregnant and refusing…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/16 11:20 AM
1

There's a difference between "keeping frame" and being a piece of shit who abandons his child. If you father a child, it's your fault, and you now have a responsibility for the welfare of that child independent of what you think of the woman. What she did or how much she lied doesn't absolve you of responsibility for your actions and your choices.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/16 10:58 AM
0

What they don't realize is most women looking to get an abortion do so because they are not yet ready They realize that. "Not ready" or "can't afford" are euphemisms for "don't want". The protest is motivated by abortions for convenience, which is the vast majority of cases. To preempt the misplaced righteous indignation: that isn't a comment on whether it should be allowed, or not, or a moral judgement on whether it's right or wrong.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/16 10:43 AM
10

This whole concept that men should fight to have a relationship and fight to have romance is bullshit. A fight for something is only necessary if it's scarce. One (of the many) problems with the "grrrl power feminist" dogma is that they attempt to commoditize sex - by glorifying sluts, encouraging promiscuity, and discouraging loyalty and femininity, they have weakened their monopoly. The bargain has always been sex in exchange for provision. Men don't do jump through all the sappy rom-com hoops…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 11:41 AM
46

She'll say that she's wasting her time with me, Think about the rationale behind that statement - she is "wasting" time with you, because you haven't committed to her support. You haven't assured her that you will support her in the future, so her being with you to that point has been useless. Her motive is not to enjoy the time she spends with you; she is only investing her time into you in order to obtain something (that you're not yet giving her, hence the "waste").
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 11:05 AM
2

Exactly; children sense a need, and lack the emotional development to restrain themselves or to know how to satisfy it while respecting others. They try different methods to satisfy it, and when they find that manipulation works, they use it - and if allowed, will internalize it as a permanent personality trait. It's a means to an end, they don't understand why it's wrong. The constant error is in men expecting women to act any differently.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 10:58 AM
13

but the man is a moron The guy parlayed a loan into billions, built a global brand name out of himself, been an international force for decades, deals at the highest levels of business, and he's spitting distance from the presidency of the most powerful country in history - and he's a "moron" and a "bitch"? LOL. If he's a moron, what are you, and your judgement, by comparison? You may dislike the guy's personality or values, but dismissing his accomplishments is just pathetic sour-grapes nonsens…
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 10:46 AM
10

Might have some potential, but the lefty-progressive-hipster-grrlpower schtick is at least a 3-point handicap. Just the thought of having to listen to a few hours of her prattling on about her radical brilliance is agony.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/16 03:41 PM
19

“When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years.” ― Mark Twain
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 12:23 PM
18

I think for all the noise they make during sex, that they don't enjoy it as much as we do. If they did, there'd be male prostitutes on street corners, and as many male strip clubs as female, and 99.9% of porn wouldn't be geared to male viewers, and the frustrated husband meme wouldn't be universal. Generally, men have sex for sex; women have sex for control over a man. Female sex "drive" varies inversely with control, and once they have total control, the sex stops.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/16 01:50 PM
3

The biggest people against you are your "loved" ones. It's terrible to admit but there it is. I'd agree, if you limited it to "female loved ones".
/r/TheRedPill27/03/16 01:41 PM
8

After admitting that the accusers outright lied, that their actions were totally opposite to their statements and that none of their stories make sense, the author can't help but insert this: As for Mr. Ghomeshi, does this verdict mean he didn’t do it? Not at all. The judge made no judgment about that. What he found was that there was not enough evidence to convict. That is a very different thing. You could make a similar statement about anybody. Just because there's no evidence, it doesn't mean…
/r/TheRedPill26/03/16 05:22 PM
1

She sent him an email early the next morning that said: “You kicked my ass last night and that makes me want to fuck your brains out. Tonight.” An odd reaction from someone who would later testify she did not consent to his violent behavior. After the alleged assault, DeCoutere spent the rest of the weekend with Ghomeshi, having brunch, going to a BBQ and taking a photo of themselves cuddling in the park. When she returned home to Halifax she sent him flowers with a note that said “Thanks for ha…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/16 02:23 PM
23

Agreed, and there's also the instinctual competition for status in the eyes of the man, and/or power to dominate him. The mother and daughter-in-law are both fighting to be the "most important" woman, to be superior in controlling the man's attention and loyalty - so they will constantly set up confrontations where the man is forced to pick a side.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 09:23 AM
2

shouldn't bother really reporting rape through real legal channels, because nobody would believe them anyway. And the implication there is that people expect women to falsely accuse. Which is what they do expect, of course.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:59 AM
45

It's possible he's a fedora-wearing r / relationships type whimpering beta. Or, since it's the woman telling the story, she's "misremembering" the words to suit her delusions, which include her being a special snowflake goddess who has wonderous magical gifts to be "taken" by undeserving men when she opens her legs. Or, more likely, the story's completely invented bullshit for internet attention points.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/16 02:08 PM
1

"I don't believe" in this case means "I don't think", not "there shouldn't be". There are some reporting requirements for banks, fiduciaries, etc. in specific areas, but if you know of a general law that forces someone to act to prevent a crime by someone else, please post it.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/16 12:11 PM
4

And of course, had the woman decided to have the child vacuumed out and liquefied in an abortion clinic, she would be a "strong independent woman," and he would have had no say or rights in the matter at all. It's her decision, only; she is in control. But if she doesn't kill the child, now she loses responsibility for her decisions and it somehow becomes his duty to stop her from causing harm to the baby. Now she has no control. The whole thing is farcical.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/16 10:09 AM
2

IANAL, but I don't believe there is a duty on a citizen to prevent a crime by somebody else. If there were, everybody on Earth would be criminally liable.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/16 09:52 AM
13

The debate would be significantly more mature and policy-specific if he did not take part. No doubt at all. And sadly maturity and policy knowledge don't necessarily win elections. If they did, we might have a competent government. But if the measure is getting support for an election, he clearly dominated this debate. And that's the point of the submission - despite his rudeness, arrogance, and lack of policy, he devastated his opponents through rhetorical and marketing skills.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 08:36 PM
8

He is clearly dominant, his showmanship is at another level. The body language, salesmanship, wit, and arrogance portray him as the only adult amongst a group of whiny children. Whether those things translate into presidential skills is another question, but he's clearly superior at getting support in comparison to his competition. And coming off of 16 years of failure, and facing the prospect of 8 more years of shrieking pantsuits and PC self-flagellation, he's at least a step in the right dire…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 04:11 PM
26

He won't be able to get away with such simple answers in a general election. Maybe not in an ideal world, where ability, intellect, and experience decided elections - but his opponent is hillary. She hasn't said anything substantive in 3 decades. No answer from her will be any "deeper" than his, except that she'll be giving them in a piercing cackle from behind a pursed scowl and a pantsuit.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 04:02 PM
5

I explained exactly why You didn't explain why, you asserted an opinion. Simply identifying alternative factors which may or may not influence behaviour does not "explain exactly why" one of the factors is not a cause for the behaviour.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 09:10 AM
1

I only stated facts. The only claimed "fact" in your post is that you read a study.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 09:03 AM
2

It wouldn't even be near close. The speed, strength, and dexterity of any male trained fighter would be incredibly difficult to overcome - but given that Floyd is, literally, the best in the world, she wouldn't stand a chance in hell.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 06:12 PM
3

I would buy a Rousey victory over Mayweather. Mayweather is a duck and dive coward in general and outside of his ticky tack boxing style You may dislike him, but saying he's a "coward" shows you know little about boxing. And no woman on Earth would last half a round in a ring with him, no matter what style of fighting.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 01:49 PM
1

She's looked good at a few weigh-ins, but she seems to balloon between fights.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 01:38 PM
6

I agree, but the bashers are justified - she is a great athlete and she has put in the work, but as you say she lost her head. She got arrogant and disrespectful. The hate, and maybe her loss, are the price of hubris. The interesting part is how she reacts now - either she feeds on the hate and comes back stronger, or like most, never recovers.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 01:02 PM
4

I was expecting them to scream DIVORCE and clean him out of everything you can get. But the top voted is "Talk to him." Because she doesn't have the kid yet. She could get a nice payout now, but what she's after is the long-term jackpot. Children are the real meal ticket, and until she has them she hasn't really secured a lifetime of support.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 08:45 AM
7

The lesson is simple; bachelorhood is socially unacceptable even for wealthy Hollywood movie stars. lol, that's giving it way too much credit. The jealousy-soaked sour-grapes whining of a desperate hag don't speak for "society"; and it's obvious to everybody why this author is spewing her bile. What is really pissing her off is that it's not only "socially acceptable," but admired and attractive - and it's out of her reach.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 09:19 PM
5

I knew it'd be bad just from the first paragraph of the "article", but that's nightmarish.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 09:10 PM
37

That is a perfectly complete reply to all of this nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 09:03 PM
4

Women are attracted to power (money, status, fame, etc.), which can increase with age. Physique and age are relevant only as they relate to power. Monica didn't wear her kneepads because of Bill's abs.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 09:40 AM
10

Apparently you've never worked under a female boss. Think of your worst boss, then add in insecurity, pettiness, vindictiveness, complete dishonesty, and lack of ability, then give them the sexist card they can flash whenever they want. Best bet if you get placed under a woman is to run, and if you can't, play it as quietly as possible. In a month, the specific nuances and qualifications of whatever he said will be forgotten, the only thing remaining will be the 5-second summary impression: "mis…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 11:18 AM
7

At some point, despite the organized opposition, there will be cures/eradications of all STDs. That's when the real shift will happen, if hyper-realistic immersion porn or some other technology hasn't already shifted it. That might not be enough to destroy the current framework, but it will damage it enough that the bureaucrats will step in to save the women by forcing marriage legislatively or outlawing extramarital sex.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/16 02:55 PM
7

Funny how even the most vicious "feminist" cunts suddenly become ponytail-twirling demure schoolgirls when something heavy has to be lifted.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 05:58 PM
4

One answer to that is that you didn't act because it would have been sexist to assume a woman couldn't do it. Further, you are more than a bit alarmed that your superior is apparently ordering you to behave in a sexist way, and may have to discuss the matter with "human relations" and your company's "diversity officer".
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 05:56 PM
73

feminism is about women making men into women, and women into men. In theory. But since being a man involves all that unpleasant stuff like work, sacrifice, logic, skill, risk, and competition, in reality it's about women remaining women while taking the products of men by force.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/16 11:24 AM
1

Well good on you for recognizing and acknowledging that, you'll be better prepared to exploit the situation (or avoid it) the next time around.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 06:17 PM
22

What exactly is making you angry? That they're sluts, or that they told you, or that they have nothing to talk about besides sexually manipulating men, or that they weren't sluts with you, or something else? Identifying that can help you adjust your expectations. And FWIW, these women may be vapid sluts, but this is all they do and they're very adept at it. If they're parading themselves as sluts for you, they either see you as a beta who they're trying to dominate into their orbit, using you as…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 11:23 AM
1

The comments on that article are great.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 09:31 AM
16

In fairness he recognizes the problem and seems to want to rectify it - maybe offering guidance would be more helpful than empty criticism.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 09:39 AM
2

Maybe "failing" is a better term - at 11 she still has a lot of time to develop. Domination, selfishness, exercise of power, seeking group status, mob punishment, these are all instinctual. We all have them to some degree, and it sounds like this girl is on the higher end of the spectrum. And from other comments apparently her maternal role model is going to be a significant barrier for her. The parental guidance relates to controlling those instincts and being able to rationally empathize with …
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 09:37 AM
1

A common feature amongst most reddit comments, and the vast majority of women's communication in general, is the lack of distinction between an argument and the personal opinion, emotion, and/or character of the speaker. The ability to understand that they can be completely independent seems to be a very rare quality. Another is the almost universal tendency to leap to hyperbolic extremes - acknowledging that there is some doubt about A immediately leads to claims of fanatical support for B. Ack…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 08:52 AM
2

Your rhetoric has the same cult-like overtones that the pro-immigration Europeans and pro-feminist Westerners have, WTF are you talking about? Show me where I said I agreed or disagreed with Paul's position, or where I said anything about who I believe should fund health care. Which "cult" do I advocate? I didn't take any position on Paul's argument, much less "cult-like" or "un-nuanced" stances. You are reading your own mental dialogue into it, and the best part is that you launch into a self-r…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 08:40 AM
-1

Again, the comments in question don't relate to whether the government should fund it or not, or how best to pay for it, or how doctors earn money - the specific point here is the legal ramifications of deeming it to be a "right", and therefore incapable of being refused.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 03:14 PM
-1

Paul is making an abstract, high-level argument about deeming something a "right", and the legal and philosophical consequences that would have for those who would therefore be obligated by law to provide a service - and your reply is childish insults and tiddlywinks nonsense about single-payer systems. Who pays or doesn't pay is irrelevant to the point of whether the government can compel involuntary service by creating a new "right", and the legal and societal ramifications of such creation. T…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 03:09 PM
-7

If a doctor refuses to treat, but health care is a right which cannot be denied, how would you ensure the provision of health care without forcing the doctor?
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 01:27 PM
-3

no stretch of the imagination can a person make this comparison honestly. If as you say you understood the context, then you see that the "slavery" is in reference to the providers. If the service of health care is a "right", then it cannot be denied, and consequently, those who provide it cannot refuse to provide it. Not being able to refuse a command to act is a form of "slavery", and that you disagree doesn't make it a "dishonest" comparison. His comment: "If I’m a physician in your community…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 12:50 PM
84

I was also banned from r / europe, for criticising their censorship of the Cologne refugee mega-rape story. If you're pushing an agenda that doesn't fit with reality, at some point you'll have to ban discussion of reality and punish those who point out the inconsistencies. This has been the pattern of every religion and political movement, and the religion of PC is no different.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 12:38 PM
21

The earlier comment asked for precise citations to murder. Posting such citations in response isn't cherry-picking.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 12:33 PM
2

The obvious solution would be to have female-only math departments, where the brilliant snowflakes can cast off the patriarchy and devote themselves to math problems all day without the distraction of the barbarian males raping them and making them feel bad. But that would be unacceptable - obviously, because it's "sexist" - and because like all the SJW outrage-mill issues, no "solution" is desired anyway. A solution would remove the pretext for the outrage, and the outrage is the whole point.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 02:48 PM
275

Like she said, she's teaching him about women.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/16 05:01 PM
0

Many men are women. All women are women.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/15 12:44 PM
1

For all nay-sayers to OP argument, let's take a look how being a BILLIONAIRE helped Zuckerberg in getting quality pussy:) Money doesn't automatically turn a chump into a non-chump. However, money held by a non-chump will expand opportunities. zukerberg may get abused by his princess - that's not because of his money, but despite it. If he had a different character, with his billions he could quite literally get millions of women to form lines for the chance to bang him. A billionaire with attitu…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/15 06:52 PM
2

Horrible advice. This woman is toxic, any contact with her can destroy this guy's life. No sex is worth what this woman is capable of costing.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/15 08:48 AM
5

If you really believe that this kind of woman can be controlled by "dick game", you have a real lot to learn.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/15 08:44 AM
8

If women wanted sex as much as men, we'd see tons of male strip clubs, male hookers standing on street corners, porn wouldn't be overwhelmingly male-targeted, there'd be mail-order grooms, etc. We don't see those things, and never have.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 08:07 PM
7

That's the point of being dark triad, pure psychopathic narcissism. The problem is that psychopathy and narcissism are not things you can voluntarily, consciously adopt. They are disorders because the person having them cannot just switch in and out when it's convenient or to sound edgy on message boards. They are all-engrossing conditions that affect every thought and action. The best a non-psychopath/narcissist can do is pretend, but in the end he'll feel regret and shame precisely because he …
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 05:52 PM
10

Even if married, she won't give a fuck about you. Even worse: if married, she'll give less of a fuck about you. The female objective is to secure committment, and all of their actions with respect to men are geared towards that goal. Once that goal is achieved they will only do what is absolutely necessary to avoid losing it. Marrying her is a declaration that you've made it more difficult to leave her, so it's automatically a license for her to lower her effort level. And she'll keep lowering i…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/15 09:05 AM
20

massively popular with younger women . He'll call himself a feminist while going ATM and jizzing in a girls mouth or holding her head down in a toilet(a la rocco) while he fucks them LOL. You can't make this shit up.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/15 04:06 PM
7

Needs to, but won't. He has some kind of severe martyr/savior complex going on with her, he's somehow convinced that he's all she's got, that if he left her she'd be lost, it's somehow his obligation to "protect" her, etc. It's funny because away from her, he's capable, strong, successful - but when he gets into her forcefield he transforms into a whiteknight servient beta with an open wallet.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/15 06:28 PM
30

A wife of a friend is a shopping hobbyist - shopping is her only interest. When she's not at the spa/massage/manicurist/hairdresser/etc. she goes from store to store, buying new copies of the same items over and over. And then she throws out the old copies, worn once or twice, simply because they are a few months old. I've seen her throw out whole garbage bags full of brand-new $300 jeans and sunglasses. This woman also uses the expensive disposable plates and cutlery, to eat food they have deli…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/15 09:56 AM
3

Don't worry, he only has to wait around for 10 years until she's gotten sufficient "experience with new things" and realizes she's up against the wall -- she'll be back with sexual enthusiasm and sob stories about being "abused", looking to hook in the beta software guy and give birth to her retirement plan.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/15 08:44 AM
45

women will tell you to stop working so hard and to spend time with them instead. This is true for every positive factor in your life. She'll slowly but gradually alienate you from your friends, distance you from your family, eliminate your hobbies, coerce you into selling your favorite things, get you to eat poorly, and essentially reduce you to a couch-sitting, defeated slave waiting for her orders. The kicker: once she's reduced you to that, she'll detest what you've become and dump you for th…
/r/TheRedPill24/11/15 08:38 AM
5

She fucks like a pornstar; She do things to you she will not make with other guys (anal, threesome, you name it) sex is free and abundant; Sex for a woman is inversely proportional to committment. She's a wild nympho in the beginning, to lure him in. She then lowers the dosage gradually. Once she believes she has the guy totally locked in, the sex stops. Doesn't matter who the guy is, if she believes he'll stay without sex, then she won't put out. If the "alpha" gets pornstar sex, it's because s…
/r/TheRedPill22/11/15 06:18 PM
2

Mussolini was a master at riling up crowds and projecting an almost supernatural presence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hpn9iPLbNDc
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 10:42 PM
19

Electing hillary wouldn't realistically change anything - just push along the agendas that are firmly in place, basically obama in a pantsuit. But symbolically, it would signal that America has completely lost course and finally abandoned the core principles that brought it to greatness.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 10:28 PM
2

Hate crime laws have been on the books even in the US for a while. They provide for a criminal punishment for holding a negative opinion of a favored class. The make-believe thought police and courts on campuses are very bad, but reality is no better.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 03:39 PM
2

It is true we live in a generation where everyone is offended Better to say "offended". It's the logical result of letting women and feminine men act without ramification. They are all looking for one thing: attention. And they will seek it in any way possible. When their friend gets attention for crying "abuse" or "rape", they do the same in an effort to compete, and if there is no punishment for their nonsense, they'll keep outdoing each other to the point of absurdity. For whatever reason, th…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/15 09:27 AM
2

You make some broad and serious claims, where is the trolling in asking if there is evidence for them? If you have a general opinion that the system is biased, unfair, and inefficient, that's one thing - and I'd agree. But it's another to claim that "family law in America" is universally regulated by secret, lawless, gag-ordered rogue courts doing whatever the fuck they want without supervison or appeal.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 10:18 AM
0

Don't know the cases, and clearly there are signficant injustices in the system and plenty of bad judges, but there must be some significant issues in those cases that aren't being mentioned. Legal proceedings are by default open to the public, that is a key feature of the whole idea of trials; and if they are sealed, there are usually specific, limited, appealable reasons. The idea that there are widespread, lawless, out-of-control secret courts with judges just jailing people on a whim for say…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 10:06 AM
2

This thread is a good reminder of the value of a lawyer when dealing with legal matters - even on a sub which tends to pride itself on logical discussion, the comments here are full of wild exaggerations, ignorance of even the basics of the legal system, and incoherent nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 09:45 AM
1

Can you provide an actual example of such a case in a secret court, where laws aren't involved and they "do what they want" with no ability to appeal?
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 09:34 AM
1

Which parts of the system are you referring to? There are specific rules about giving notice for lawsuits, notice is always a mandatory element of a lawsuit, and in every state there's a lot more required than just sending a letter to some random address and then cleaning out their bank account. Exactly what happened here is unclear, but this story leaves out plenty of important details.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 09:30 AM
1

You can appeal a case in the US as well. Do you really think appeals are exclusive to Europe? Which parts of the justice system are "corrupt" in your opinion?
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 09:28 AM
8

First off, your situation sucks hard, and anyone who's dealt with women can sympathize. You had your day in court, by by taking a plea deal. But it's hard to believe that an attorney actually lied about having a chance to "change your mind". He would have nothing to gain by screwing you, and would put his career at risk or worse. As for whether there's anything to be done at this point, the only thing you can do is get a good criminal lawyer, tell him everything, and don't say another word to th…
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 10:20 PM
14

and got mad jelly General recommendation: don't say/write things like that if you want to be taken seriously.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 09:04 AM
8

If they were all reading books, it'd at least be of benefit - but if I had to bet, I'd say the vast majority were looking at inane IMs and facebook drivel.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 10:03 AM
9

Reminds me of a scene that similarly stuck in my memory - I was on a train that stopped at a station, and I looked over to the platform across the track going the other way. There was a long line of people waiting for the train, maybe 75-100 people shoulder to shoulder, and each in the exact same "phone pose", head down staring at their fucking phones. Nobody talking, no interaction at all, every one of them standing the exact same way as if they were soldiers in formation.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 09:10 AM
1

Neither are most career choices that make bank, Which is contrary to your earlier statement that "becoming a millionaire isn't too hard". Most med school loans get paid off in about 2-4 working years.Malpractice isn't nearly as bad Maybe, maybe not. Depends where you work, if you support a family, and your expenses. The math isn't hard to figure out, even for the "ignorant" - if you can pay off $400k after taxes and expenses in 2 years, good for you. This is a modern fear-mongering myth, but it'…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 08:33 AM
36

Becoming a doctor is no easy task. Start out being born within the top 5% of intellectual potential, then outperform academically for 25 years straight, then slave through another 4-8 years of 36-hour shifts for a subsistance stipend, all the while surrounded by sickness and death and dealing with people and their families at the worst time of their lives. Then, if you can established in a large enough market to make money, you can start your 10 year plan of paying down $400k in loans by fightin…
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 09:30 AM
16

Women aren't unique in this, though. I agree, a majority of men do this to some degree. A difference, though, might be that men in general are at least capable of recognizing that objective truths, standards, and reasons exist. They choose to ignore them when it's convenient, out of selfishness, laziness, impulse, greed, etc., but they can at least acknowledge them. In contrast, women seem to be incapable of recognizing them at all, if they produce a result counter to their feelings. For example…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 11:19 AM
8

I agree with your consistency argument. The issue I have is judging the man's actions as negative because using alimony makes him somehow "weak", rather than because alimony in general is bad. Saying "alimony is bullshit, and for that reason the man shouldn't use it" would be more consistent.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 08:21 AM
6

I'm baffled if he ever gets laid again, If he wins, he'll have more money, and therefore a higher chance of getting laid.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 08:15 AM
64

The hypocrisy in every woman's life is so overwhelming that they themselves can't see it In most cases, there are no universal, objective truths or codes from a woman's perspective. Rules and standards do not apply equally to every person, but are applied selectively according to how that rule makes the woman feel in a particular situation. The idea of a woman getting alimony makes the woman feel good, so it's a good thing. A woman paying alimony makes her feel bad, so it's bad. The fact that th…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 08:10 AM
1

we define "women" as anyone female identifying -- including ... genderqueer, and non-binary." A handout to anyone who says they're a woman, even if they don't go so far as to say they actually are a woman. Got it. And TIL: "genderqueer" = person who does not subscribe to conventional gender distinctions but identifies with neither, both, or a combination of male and female genders." LOL.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 09:00 PM
1

Agreed, his talents could've been put to better use in another character. And tons of actors say "fuck", but few say it as well as he does.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 03:43 PM
10

And Samuel L. Jackson is even cooler, regardless of your race. Whatever the reason for casting him, he was the only thing of value in the massive shitpile of the last 3 star wars movies.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 02:05 PM
-1

Not sure if that is sexist or racist.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 01:59 PM
0

about even 50% of which aren't attractive enough to get any male attention whatsoever. Watch Jerry Springer. It's got a constant stream of the most repugnant "women" on Earth, all of whom are cheating on the dregs that they attract.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 10:30 AM
2

The insanity isn't that they're blamed, that can be expected - the weak and pathetic will resort to any tactic. The insanity is that the strong have bent so far to accomodate it and apologize for the existence of common fucking sense. The answer to all this sjw bullshit should be "STFU". Anything more is giving it more credit than it deserves.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 01:54 PM
7

And the kicker: if guys walk around naked in the men's locker room in front of these cunts, they'd screech "rape".
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 01:48 PM
17

This is on the level of debating the merits of kardashians and bruce jenner fighting about selfies. Idiots write gossip columns to entertain other idiots. It's meaningless and not worth your energy to think about, much less get worked up over. Direct your energy toward your own success, ignore morons and the things they say.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 10:33 AM
1

I'd classify that as technology, a more efficient way to provide for their needs.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 12:52 PM
9

this kind of shit can't go on for much longer. This has been going on since the dawn of time. Human nature never changes, only technology and positions on the political cycles.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 10:12 AM
35

This woman is such a slave to her tingles that she's willing to invite a bunch of strangers to hang around her children, The multiple-father bullshit is just the most recent excuse she came up with. She wants to (or is) keep the door open to move on to something better than the guy she's with, and will say any nonsense that sticks - he's apparently gullible and spineless and apparently bit on that one, so she ran with it. The idea that she actually has some grand philosophy about communal parent…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 10:09 AM
3

the ancients seemed to have less tolerance for bullshit Having survival depend on your actions has that effect. When every day is a fight against enemies, nature, disease, and your neighbors, you have less time to devote to estrogen attention rants and the trivial whims of your dependents. Gyno-centrism, feminism, and the various other modern victimhood movements depend on people having all their basic needs met, and not having a real fear of their survival. If you haven't eaten in 4 days or the…
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 02:51 PM
11

Had a kid with gang banger in her 20's That has a very, very small chance of turning out well, for everybody involved.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 02:37 PM
9

he needs to stop wasting her time and man-up." That is telling about the view of a woman toward a "relationship." It is something that she endures for the expected profit of a commitment. It is not about sharing each moment, living a life in union, enjoying herself with you. It's about the goal of securing a commitment - in fact, if there it turns out that there's no commitment to support her, all that time and effort spent with you have been a "waste of time"(!). Think about that choice of phra…
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 02:34 PM
4

Another sign that this schtick has been played out to the point of parody, when desperate attention-whore shock performers use it to get headlines. Next we'll see britney spears and paris hilton jump in to the party, maybe bruce jenner can score an "exclusive" with oprah about his rape story. How about some rape iphone apps and twitter rape-feed social media 2.0? And rape clothing lines, maybe nike can make some rape edition sneakers. Once facebook has a rape banner or some such thing and the su…
/r/TheRedPill23/09/15 09:42 AM
1

"bulk" doesn't seem to have hurt these guys' jump too much. http://ukolympicweightlifting.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/huster_jump.jpg http://www.womensweightlifting.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/10008_495917333796429_273056645_n1.jpg
/r/TheRedPill23/09/15 08:03 AM
1

Well the wild-child nymphomaniac character had to be of age so the hero could demonstrate his magical alphaness. Good thing, despite being a superhot parent-hating 25 year-old slut, she is still obedient enough to attend a loser-filled Christmas party, at her mother's job, just in time for the hero to drive her wild with passion.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/15 03:02 PM
6

It couldn't talk. Sounds like a feature, not a limitation.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 09:59 AM
1

"Compensation" means something given in exchange by the person who is receiving the loyalty. Money, time, security, reputation, etc. Certainly "honor" or "satisfaction" or "fulfillment", etc., are incentives for a person to be loyal - but they aren't given or controlled by the person receiving the loyalty.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 07:38 AM
4

Loyalty is allegiance without regard to compensation. If it's for compensation, it's commericalism.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 01:39 PM
2

Maybe, if you're filthy rich and move to a 3rd world shithole, but then you have to fortress yourself off from the population, and you and your kids have to live in a shithole. As for W. Europe, the tax/inheritance/property/labor systems there make the US seem like a libertarian dream. And they are orders of magnitude worse in the gyno-centricity department.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 04:05 PM
3

Agreed. Frankly the original comment makes no sense. the "benefit" doesn't compensate for the additional cost of supporting the wife; and if the wife works, there may be no "benefit" at all, and there is no accounting for the extra cost (in all forms, most prominently potential divorce) of having a wife, which are far greater than any tax savings. The extra exclusion is hers, which means that it comes along with filing jointly and her having rights in the profit. His exclusion does not increase,…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 03:51 PM
15

Although there is no official "TRP canon", one fundamental concept seems to be that males should strive to be honorable. Not the sacrificial, romance-movie definition of "honor" as deifying and deferring to women, but in the sense of remaining true to one's principles and upholding obligations despite outcome.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 08:19 AM
3

No matter which generation you are, you won't see many major corporate executives or supreme court justices with neck tattoos. Tattoos are a sign of, at best, a desperate desire for acceptance, and in the case of always-visible tattoos, of very poor judgement. In some cases it could work, in fields that depend on trendiness like artists or pop singers, but in most cases, covering yourself in drawings is voluntarily limiting your opportunities for the reward of following the current fashion trend…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 07:51 PM
5

Excluding the irrelevant bit about tattoos and hair style choices It is relevant to the argument that feminism is deluding these women, convincing them that longstanding behaviour expectations and customs are, suddenly, no longer important, and that they can do whatever they want without consequence. A woman who covers herself with visible tattoos is almost always condemning herself to a life of mediocrity and mockery. The media and the radical hambeasts tell them that the rules don't apply, tha…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 08:32 AM
1

This is the plotline of every bored housewife romantic fiction. Most romance fiction follows the same theme of domestication and subjugation of the wild male by the female through use of her sexuality. It's the female version of the Hero's Journey.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 08:53 AM
11

Yes, this should be encouraged, and amplified if possible. Nothing can demonstrate the absurdity of radical progressive social manipulation better than actually trying it for real. On talk shows and in the circlejerks of academia, these policies are protected by not having to actually work. It's great to screech and whine in hypotheticals, as long as you don't have to show that what you're screeching about makes sense in reality. Marx and Castro sound great in a classroom, but they produced mise…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 09:00 AM
9

Not Capitalism, but perpetual deficit-spending and debt-based consumerism do.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 08:39 AM
9

That's what the fed is for.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 08:35 AM
2

Ah, got it. Yes it's the victimhood-du-jour. They used to be oppressed by the vote, when they got that they switched to being victims of alcohol, then it was oppression in the workplace, then oppression in the military, now it's "rape". It'll be interesting to see what they come up with next, once they succeed in getting rape-defense bodycams strapped to every male.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 09:57 AM
2

She appears to be suffering from what seems to be a novel but very real psychological affliction which could be called rape-victim fetishism. Hard to see how it could be "novel" when it's apparently the primary hobby of the entire SJW world.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 07:50 AM
1

Again, because it's what men are taught. You're driven by "reason", then make this argument? Men don't really want sex, they're brainwashed into it? It's not instinct, that would be too obvious - instead, there is a vast, uninterrupted, universal conspiracy to "teach" men to desire sex? In all cultures, at all times from ancient mythology to the present, in all corners of the globe, this conspiracy is so powerful that it forces men everywhere to want something they would otherwise not want. Who …
/r/TheRedPill03/06/15 09:26 PM
0

If women wanted sex, just for sex, there would be male prostitutes on the street corners, male strip clubs, and 99% of porn wouldn't be made for men. We don't see those, because it isn't the case. There is a clear distinction in the sex drives between the genders. Obviously men value affection, but on the whole, sex is viewed as a goal by men even without affection. If you haven't seen evidence of this, you're either delusional or lying. As for married men, I know dozens of them - in every marri…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/15 07:46 AM
0

Sex, per se, no. Sex as a way to get affection and attention, or as a means to secure committment, maybe. And once they have the affection and/or committment locked in, their "desire" for sex evaporates - ask any married man.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 10:39 AM
8

It's impossible to enforce fairly - every sexual encounter is open to some sort of ex-post claim of some type of disappointment or misunderstanding. But unfairness or unenforceability doesn't mean the politicians won't happily waste lives and resources on it - look at the "war on drugs".
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 10:16 AM
25

This law labels (or recognizes) all women as whores. If you tell a whore you have the money to pay her, obtain her services, and then say "oops, sorry I'm broke", that would be a theft. Whores don't put out for free.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 10:06 AM
3

Depends on how you define "great", obviously, but Jesus Christ, Martin L. King, Mother Teresa, and Gandhi come to mind.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 09:56 AM
1

losing all faith that someone would love me unconditionally until my end? Your children, your siblings and parents, your friends, or your dog - maybe. But don't expect it from a woman.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 02:10 PM
2

He has SMV because he acts this way, not the other way around.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 11:16 AM
16

.... and now some unknown "art buyer" jerry saltz is also famous. Along with whatever talking head moron that puts saltz on television and hypes the nonsense he spews, and so on. And that's the only point of this disgusting charade. This kind of bullshit goes hand-in-hand with reality-tv/celebrity media bullshit - the goal is to get attention, always. It doesn't matter if it's because you claim rape, or because your rape claim is proven false, or because your ass is huge, or you're a good person…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 03:44 PM
16

confiding in me that male professors had "flirted" with them during one-on-one office "Flirting," how quaint. Nowadays the line has been racheted up to "rape" - it's apparently a challenge finding a girl on a modern campus that doesn't claim to have been "raped".
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 08:52 AM
26

Usual story - all of the benefits, but without the associated risks and costs. They want to be pampered and protected as delicate princesses, while having full access to power; they want to be treated as weak inferiors in courts and alimony, while having equal work opportunities; they want all the privileges of marriage, without the unpleasant duties of caring for a husband; they want to be given special protections against things they dislike, while maintaining access to all the things they do …
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 08:40 AM
1

To make people feel comfortable and, uh, safe? You attack and label an entire sub as "creepy" and incapable of understanding what you claim to understand, namely, the "rationale" for a "safe space". Then, when asked to define this profound "rationale", you respond with an inane tautology? The rationale for a "safe space" is to make people feel safe? That's what makes TRP "creepy"? That's the best you can come up with? As to your unrelated rant that this policy is simply "looking out for their co…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 03:49 PM
2

What I find creepy is that no one on this sub seems to understand the rationale for maintaining a "safe space" The obvious "rationale" is that "safe space" is the latest in a string of PC buzzwords to signal "opinions disagreeing with PC dogma are prohibited". Since you consider yourself superior and enlightened, tell us: what is the rationale we all fail to see?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 08:10 AM
1

they should be encouraging Red Pillers to post. The absurdity of our beliefs would be exposed immediately Authority going to lengths to prohibit ideas is a sure sign that there's some merit to them.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 07:55 AM
18

It's a great example of first-world problems taken to the extreme. As societies, they've worked really hard and solved most of the basic problems that occupied people throughout history - they have a great standard of living, almost no real poverty, high automation, health care, transportation, everybody has housing and rights and money, etc. So now what, what to do with all that free time you used to spend on survival and menial tasks? Start inventing bullshit just to stay active and have a rea…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 03:36 PM
1

It's really hard to go unnoticed as a man "transitioned" to a woman, you can always tell; but strangely some women can pull off looking like a man convincingly.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 03:24 PM
4

Sorry man, but this is just how women are in this day and age. Women have always been that way, since the dawn of mankind.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 11:21 AM
0

I don't know why it was deleted - if it was deleted by a mod, I agree that the deletion would be disappointing.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 08:56 AM
4

The SJWs are going to rant and screech for attention and handouts, that's what they do. The skinny-jeans orbiters will weep and commiserate, that's what they do. But in the end, as always, it comes down to money - this site is owned by a corporation. If the corporate managers decide that killing TRP makes them more money than keeping it, it goes; and vice-versa. Ideology and expression are nice to debate, but reality is governed by the dollar.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 08:13 AM
0

The original comment is deleted, but it said something about TRP opinion offending people and "how can we improve ourselves?" - my point is that first you'd need to define what needs "improving". The earlier comment seemed to suggest that some form of self-censoring is necessary/suggested to avoid "offending" some people. My default position would be that people should have the freedom to form and hold their own opinions, and that if those opinions "offend" others, those others should have the f…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 07:40 AM
3

Is this a problem? Maybe you could, instead, define why it is a problem, or what about "us", precisely, needs to be "improved". The burden of establishing a crime rests on the accuser. I don't have a problem with people having their own opinions - if you do, you should justify why you hold the power to restrict what they believe and say.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 07:56 PM
4

turning every place on Earth into a McDonalds ballpen. McDonald's ballpens are far too unrestricted. Their ideal is a male-funded ballpen that only admits overprivileged, shallow-headed women and their effeminate obedient eunuchs, where everyone has to pretend to be interested while they whine and rant about how the world doesn't give them enough attention and free shit.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 07:53 PM
15

It is - but so is conservatism. And so is socialism, and communism, and all the other "ideologies" that seek to define, and more importantly control, what is best for you. Any ideology other than supporting the maximization of individual freedom is just wordgames to exert power over others.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 07:41 PM
28

How does that have anything to do with the mods' agenda? If intelligent discourse were a deciding factor, they wouldn't be using phrases like "safe spaces" in the first place. They don't give a shit about discourse - this is about corporate pressure to get rid of non-PC material, and mods imposing their biases on the people they have power over.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 07:30 PM
12

how stupid someone must be to think the could justify censoring this community. This has happened to every big forum - it may start out with open participation, but the mods and admins always get full of themselves and start looking for ways to exert their power and biases on everyone else. They start banning and regulating and meddling with the content, and eventually it reaches a point where people just abandon the forum en masse. It then either disappears or becomes some kind of corporate ad-…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 07:24 PM
2

Idiots and losers will always scream and throw tantrums for attention. They are the only ones taking this nonsense seriously. Ignore them, or laugh at them if you must.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/15 08:22 AM
7

"Motivation" and "life goals" are princess-bitch code for "able to give me money, gifts, food, and housing."
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 03:24 PM
-3

Yes, women don't care about money unless it is the long game The only women I've ever encountered who didn't care about the money of the man they're with (or targeting to be with), at all stages, were a couple of artist/hippie types - and they were only indifferent because their fathers were rich, so they didn't need to care.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 03:21 PM
19

That is the entire point of PC - to prohibit the discussion of reality, when reality disagrees with the dogma. PC means that not only are unfavored opinions banned, but simply discussing the merits of unfavored opinions is also banned. Debating a position is treated as believing the opposite, and therefore disallowed. Since PC-approved ideas are mostly absurd and easily disprovable, the best way to propagate them is to simply prohibit discussion about them outright.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 07:58 AM
2

I don't want to be an animal though. Why? Who taught you that who and what you are is wrong?
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 04:37 PM
6

Women only have one means of power, The entire western legal system is geared drastically in favor of women. Half the posts here wouldn't exist, otherwise. Try reading some divorce settlements, workplace "discrimination" cases, and fake rape prosecutions and see who's got which cards.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 04:31 PM
13

Losing your kids and half you own is not that bad. Spoken by someone without kids? For some guys, losing their kids is absolutely devastating. Not to mention for the kids, too.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 04:25 PM
12

Don't be in such a hurry to blame the victim of fraud for the crime. It's unlikely that she was acting like a hateful disrespectful bitch the first time he met her, or maybe even until after the marriage/kid. I'd bet that a large portion of men wouldn't marry the woman they later discovered their wives to be - women know that, and scheme accordingly.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 01:40 PM
1

how women have their own sexual strategy and we have to accept it, not whine about it or judge it as good/bad. No, you have to acknowledge it, but you don't have to accept it, much less obey it. And as anything with humans, there is a spectrum - the female strategy is to secure assets and protection in return for sex, but that doesn't lead to the conclusion that all of them are extreme-case, blatantly contemptuous golddigging cunts like the case here. All women have their eye on the money, but n…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 09:18 AM
1

Which is why she should have her own lawyer if they are separate parties to a contract. In a pre-nup, her interests are opposed to his, they shouldn't be consulting the same lawyer.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 08:46 AM
1

Good for you, if that's the way you wanted it to go. I personally wouldn't have been able to contain my anger and disgust - and even if I could avoid hostility in the interests of my son, I certainly couldn't share a table with such scum. I really can't even fathom being so depraved and base as to beg my daughter's father-in-law to give her money. It's surreal.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 08:36 AM
1

if I were you I'd eliminate the trust fund entirely I see your point, but that just punishes the son for making the mistake of being taken by a gold-digging cunt. We've all been there, manipulated by the deviousness and selfishness of women, and OP's son is young. There are legal ways to protect the wealth without hurting the son. But hopefully this will serve as a learning opportunity, and maybe be enough to get him to dump her and look for a slightly less arrogant woman.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 08:18 AM
1

Re-read the comment you replied to, Rambo. He agrees with you.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 08:01 AM
4

A wedding planner doesn't take suggestions from the groom, either. A therapist knows who the customer and the motivation for the counselling is, and that the money is in feeding her fantasy rather than resolving the conflict.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 08:27 PM
17

YOU ARE TRIGGERING ME SHITLORD.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 08:23 PM
1

and women would cooperate with other women. More likely they'd sabotage each other using deception and manipulation. Can you name any "cooperative" game where women, due to their superior cooperation, outperform men? (and if the response is that "well men invent all the games, so women are discriminated against" - what is stopping women from inventing cooperative games?)
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 08:00 AM
9

You seem to be equating "nice" with "weak". Women respond to dominance, power, and confidence - those are not the opposite of "nice". A very dominant man can also be kind and generous; and a weak man can be cruel and petty. Women will not be attracted to a weak and submissive man simply because he is cruel and petty.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 08:55 AM
7

Same as ray romano, married with children, the show with the mall cop guy, and tons of others - the basic theme of good-hearted incompetent beta getting shit on by the superior bitch wife is pretty popular.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/15 12:33 PM
5

since all her peers were cold hearted driven women. It's sad in a way - these women have been indoctrinated into a bizarre ideology where they have been led to believe that their worth depends on their acting like men. But they aren't men, the things they dedicate their lives to don't actually make them happy, and they never can.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/15 11:53 AM
3

tl;dr: a lot of words to state the obvious.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/15 11:47 AM
6

Cue the estrogen rages, where his car gets keyed and fake rape charges get filed.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/15 07:34 AM
16

Next time she'll threaten to call the cops and charge you with rape if you don't write her history essay. Sounds crazy - but any crazier than lying about pregancy for math homework? Consider this experience a flashing-light warning. If you spend one more second interacting with this woman, you deserve whatever you get.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/15 07:30 AM
6

Don't worry, they wouldn't have gotten it anyway. Anyone dumb enough to sincerely believe the propaganda spewed by these programs is too stupid to reason with; and anyone who doesn't already knows it's nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 09:59 PM
12

But instead of learning about actual psychology of women, we learned about feminism and how men and women's brains do not differ at all. They have a class focused on the "Psychology of Women" which teaches that there is no female psychology. Makes sense.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 08:26 PM
6

My question for you is: how does one improve the quality of the sex they have? That's an interesting thing to consider. It most certainly does not correlate to hotness, intelligence or education. Looking back on it, I'd say that the best experiences were those (too few) times when the woman wanted me as much as I wanted her. Not that the women actually wanted sex, but that they wanted to be connected to me. and genuinely wanted me to enjoy it. And maybe that explains part of why it's usually so …
/r/TheRedPill13/04/15 08:06 AM
11

The best way I can describe it is like a homeless person thinking your going to take his box. Fantastic analogy, in all respects.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 08:18 PM
8

The only woman who would say she wants to spend her life with a guy, but isn't interested in marriage, is a liar.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 08:13 PM
1

Women's SMV is 100% genetic and immutable. Their best efforts can not increase it. Physique may be the only consideration in a hypothetical thought experiment where only sex is considered, but in reality some non-sex interaction is always needed. There are plenty of hot women who are made repugnant by malicious bitch attitudes, emotional instability and hysteria, or deceptiveness.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 02:42 PM
2

He was making that same 200k per year when he got dumped by his tubby wife. If the only way she had access to that money were to stay with him, she would still be with him, no matter what he did. She only left because she concluded that she would be able to access the money without him.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 10:15 AM
2

Alpha/beta means nothing if there's substantial money involved. If he has enough money, she'll stay around as long as it lasts, finds another guy with more money, or until she secures a way to get the money without the guy.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 10:12 AM
1

Hey narcissistic_walrus - thanks for your comment. It made me revisit this thread and re-read that post. Every time I think of my friend I shake my head in sadness, and it still doesn't seem possible that things went the way they did. It really is surreal. I would never have believed it, had I not seen it myself, had it been anybody other than him telling me what was happening.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 05:46 PM
12

Anything associated with a wedding automatically gets jacked up. Because it's her day, no expense is spared for her day. In their minds, not wasting money would mean that she isn't as valuable and special as a woman who can make men throw away their work and time. $20 worth of cake batter is worth paying $2000 for, a useless trinket sitting on her finger is worth $10000, because wasting money on her means she is special.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 11:32 AM
3

It would be fair to repay her half of her (not welfare's) cumulative costs of child support, if he didn't pay before. I highly doubt they add up to 2 million. But giving her money he made decades after the divorce is just absurd.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 04:00 PM
1

So the innocent victim girls are involuntarily indoctrinated while being forced to live amongst boys and consume male media propaganda. This could easily be a chapter in a women's studies "textbook" - nicely done.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 07:22 PM
3

Ah, perfect! Another consequence of being born into the patriarchy, no responsibility on their part, they are the perpetual innocent victims. I like it.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 07:15 PM
5

If men were better men then women wouldn't be lesbians, That implies that being lesbian is somehow "bad" or that they would "prefer" to not be lesbians, if the situation were different. Patriarch sexist shitlord asshole bigot!
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 07:13 PM
36

I'm sure there is a way to construe lesbian violence as being men's fault, but I can't think of one now.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 02:32 PM
1

You are arguing against an inherently illogical and unfair system using logic and fairness. It won't work. The only way to win with something like this is to not play.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 10:46 AM
7

Philosophy, not "women's studies". Male teacher, not female. Big differences.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 10:40 AM
25

Expecting a woman teaching a "woman's studies" class to be impartial, open-minded, and fair is like expecting gravity to stop working when you jump off a bridge. You can expect all you want, but it won't end well.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 10:37 AM
3

As soon as someone uses the term "patriarchal structures" non-sarcastically, they deserve to be downvoted.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 10:13 PM
3

You're right that India will shock the senses and take one out of their comfort zone. But don't gloss over the fact that it is truly disgusting, at a level of filth and savagery worse than you could imagine. I wouldn't recommend India, not because it doesn't offer challenges, but because those challenges don't compensate for the horror of actually being there. That kind of thing isn't for everybody. Issuing grand absolutes and calling people sissies because they don't see the same value in being…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 12:04 AM
41

so worried about their precious muscles For some people, muscles and working out are their life, or a big part of it. There's no reason to get bitchy and derogative just because they aren't a part of yours.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 11:44 PM
2

Wild guess - there aren't many "bottle girls" that turned down acceptances to Engineering schools in order to chase their dream to become whores.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 12:12 PM
1

Quit your job, give away all your money and possessions, then go home and start swaggering around about how much of a "masculine" tough guy you are. Pay close attention to how much she loves you then.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 08:46 PM
-1

If she doesn't really believe that you will/can leave her, it will only get worse.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 09:10 AM
-1

"If you do _______ I'll give you a blowjob." They all do that, the only difference is the _____.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 09:07 AM
1

And that is the only thing that will motivate her to do it.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 09:02 AM
6

imagine going from your gf enjoying pleasuring you because she thinks you're hot She doesn't do it because you're "hot", she does it to maintain/increase your commitment. Once you marry her, the commitment is harder to back out of, so the motive to use sex to maintain your commitment decreases. Once you have kids, even more commitment, even less motivation. If you are a locked-in beta and there's no fear that you will dump her, the motivation goes to zero.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 09:00 AM
-2

A blow job is an intimate sexual act you do selflessly to please your husband LOL. You have a lot to learn my friend.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 08:51 AM
15

I seriously don't understand this. Women compete for men's attention, and can be counted on to do so dishonorably. Lying, manipulating, and cheating are par for the course. It doesn't have to make any logical sense, they'll do it even if the guy treats them equally or there's no benefit to winning the competition - ex-girlfriends, mothers and daughters-in-law, students, they all do it.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 08:38 AM
18

Feigning interest to get money - the rule rather than the exception.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 10:13 AM
11

Nice idea, but it may be a bit obscure given that the knowledge base of most of them consists of fashion labels, cosmetics, and "candy crush".
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 10:16 AM
17

So women have to have a sufficiently good reason to have sex? Who makes the judgement as to what is sufficient, which reasons are too "wicked" - you? Are you the judge of what she should be able to do with her own body? And what motivation is lofty enough for you? Is a dare too "wicked"? What if they just feel like it, is that ok, or do you deem yourself competent to veto that too? What if the woman receives an unbalanced share of the benefit - will you come charging in on your white horse to wa…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 09:07 AM
12

Her motivations are irrelevant as to the question of "rape". Everybody has some motivation when they have sex. She could have sex because she wanted something in return, because she felt like it, or because it was Wednesday. Her justification doesn't make it rape unless she communicated an unwillingness to do it.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 08:59 AM
3

Again, agreed. A cute element of the PC propaganda is that it always sidesteps the issue of experience and the reasons for all the behaviors they rant against, as if societal customs were written up in some smoky back room by a bunch of old white men on a whim for shits and giggles. They ignore that thousands of generations of experience has guided people in how to act, and there are good reasons for the rules that came out of that experience. There are good reasons that every society in human h…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 07:03 PM
1

You actually, as a man, convince yourself you're responsible for a woman's actions because of a behaviour YOU DID or DIDN'T do. We're in agreement overall, but this statement above is not what I am saying. You are not responsible for her actions, you are only responsible for yours - and that includes the responsibility to protect yourself from her actions. For example, a starving lion can be relied on to eat a human if the human enters its cage, even if the human enters with a motive to help the…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 02:48 PM
3

Thought processes are very different from the inside than from the outside, and it's very easy to judge from the detached comfort of a keyboard. Real despair is a bitch, and it's impossible to understand unless you actually are in it.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 12:31 PM
-1

But it's your fault for putting the dog on the carpet. Ultimately you control the carpet, it's up to you to keep the dog away from it. The dog has no responsibility because it can't have any responsibility, it's not functionally capable of assuming responsibility for anything. Arguing that it should be different is a waste of time, it's like arguing against gravity.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 12:23 PM
1

by reading the textbooks on my own Exactly - that's my point. I agree that sociology, as a subject, can be interesting and valuable. A sociology class, especially in a PC-cult modern university, which consists mainly of repeating the propaganda and personal views of close-minded fanatics in return for a piece of paper, is usually a different thing. If the teacher were motivated by real education and really open to debate and expression, it could be a good exercise. But in the majority of cases i…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 08:30 AM
5

Your mistake was in taking the class in the first place. There is nothing to be gained, no valuable knowledge to be found, in a sociology class at a fanatical-PC modern university (or maybe in any sociology class, period).
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 10:13 PM
9

Better: don't take the class in the first place. You have zero chance of actually improving your knowledge, but you waste time and money. There is nothing at all to be gained.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 10:10 PM
10

An extremely perceptive and accurate description. A brainwashing technique that has been used on prisoners of war is to force the prisoners to publicly state or write that their countries are evil, and that the country holding them is superior and moral, etc. Even if it's forced and the prisoner has no choice, the act of publicly criticising your own country and supporting your enemy can have an effect on the will to fight, and can make the prisoners more docile and obedient to their captors, so…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 10:04 PM
4

You can't oppose human nature in the long term. You can try, with laws and courts and media propaganda, but eventually it collapses under its own weight. Communism, drug prohibition, deficit spending, sacrificial nationalism, etc., eventually they all fail. Then people overreact in the opposite direction, and the cycle repeats.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 03:36 PM
10

You have a lot to learn my friend.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 03:29 PM
5

The "had it coming" is a tipoff. That reeks of feminst buzzword.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 03:27 PM
1

The worst part is how these false rape accusers are never criminally charged for all the damage they created. There's a reason that banks don't just take your word for it. What do you think the result would be, if they did?
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 03:23 PM
4

It baffles me that this has been allowed to happen. It's a natural consequence of female sexual "liberation". We like to think of ourselves as above the ignorant people of the past, but there are very good reasons why every society in history, at nearly all times excepting the last 40 years, has used some type of regulatory system to control female behavior. They learned its necessity through hard experience. The manipulative power they wield over men is the most significant in society, or at le…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 03:16 PM
-1

what reaction should be making in me? To feel ashamed? Sorry? Tomrun away and never comeback? To cry? And then, you play the victim and solicit sympathy. Again, if you want to broaden your understanding, consider your posts in contrast with others here.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 09:02 PM
1

I don't think I look fabulous or amazing... And I would not give myself any high number as many guys here like to number women... But so far, I have not yet had a problem in being attractive to the kind of men I like. So first you troll for reaction/attention by mischaracterizing the OPs argument, then launch into an unsolicited, defensive autobiography. In case you are here trying to gain knowledge about TRP, consider your posts in contrast with the others in this thread.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 11:58 AM
7

Voat I like the look of it. I'd be happy to use Voat, if it means even a brief escape from the screeching SJWs and perpetual victims that reddit is infested with. reddit looks close to reaching critical mass and pulling a digg - it seems to happen to all forums and "social media" sites eventually. Once they get big enough, the mods get really full of themselves and power-drunk, and start forcing their own vision on everybody. Look for some new "big site upgrade" with a layout change or "reddit 2…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 09:43 AM
7

If you are pushing an illogical agenda, eventually people realize it's illogical and reject it. At that point, you have to resort to force to make them obey. The force available here is to ban the speech. Communism, cults, doctrinal religions, wars for profit, fiat currencies, militant feminism, etc. - same scheme, different labels.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 09:25 AM
16

Not too long ago, reddit announced that it would start censoring posts from "climate change deniers." There's no better indicator of the weakness of an argument than prohibiting disagreement with it.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 09:15 AM
9

On point #2 - If you can make a girl orgasim she usually will be pretty happy and will want sex with you. If you're a broke loser beta, you can offer her orgasms on demand and get scoffed at. If you're rich/powerful, she'll come begging for you to stain her blue dress and expect nothing in return.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 04:00 PM
29

I banged Opiodus because he was funny when I met him - turns out I don't think he's so funny any more. RAPE! I banged Opiodus because he said he was honest. Then I caught him lying. RAPE! I banged Opiodus because he said he liked me, but then he left me. RAPE! Allowing a charge of "rape by deception," with the "deception" being defined as contrary to a woman's expectation, would be incredibly dangerous and fundamentally wrong.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 11:37 AM
3

And the go-to reply is "jealous".
/r/TheRedPill16/01/15 09:39 AM
2

b) even if I do find such a unicorn, how do I know she won't morph into an angry, bitter cunt later in life when she gets bored of the stability of marriage, and then takes half my shit? It's not a question of morphing, but rather of removing the disguise. The loving, sexual, supportive act is an enticement to commit. Once the committment has been made and exit is difficult or impossible, there's no longer a need to pretend they're not angry, bitter cunts.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/15 09:33 AM
8

She understood that, Famous last words. Be careful - maybe you found the unicorn, but the safer bet is to assume you didn't.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 10:55 PM
23

If the guy in charge is a BB or man hating woman keep your head low, do the minimum that is required of you and keep looking for a better job. Particularly the looking for a job part - if you get put under a true, bitter man-hater, it's only a matter of time before she forces you out. Not if, but when. Do it on your terms and get out as soon as you can. You can't deal with or win over that type of woman, you can't appeal to any sense of responsibility as a boss, or please her with your abilities…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 10:11 PM
7

That's the point. From a man's point of view, it isn't - which is why they usually don't. But women do not share a man's point of view.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 09:29 PM
0

This sub should have an age minimum.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 12:19 PM
3

Everything you could learn in a university undergrad program is online, for free or nearly so. If learning were the main motivation for attending university, enrollment would be a thousandth of what it is.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 12:12 PM
3

Don't feed the trolls - the most-ignored maxim of the Internet.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 11:18 AM
3

unless you stretch the definition of rape to mean drunk sex, cat calling etc, in which case, that 1/3 statistic starts to make sense If you define "rape" as forceable penetration under duress or resistance, the number would be far, far less than 10%.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 05:56 PM
3

A "Not Crazy Bitch" list would be a lot shorter.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 05:53 PM
10

Mentally insert "me, me, me" before and after every sentence a woman says, and the conversation will make more sense.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 10:48 PM
13

Tell mom to bring you down some more hotpockets, you sound grumpy.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 11:08 AM
23

But...but...bu according to all the movies and television shows it's so funny! Handle me at my worst, I even have a Marilyn Monroe tattoo! So what if I hit you and scream and threaten to destroy your entire life with false accusations because you don't obey my command to look where I tell you to look? What's the big deal? Don't you realize that opening my legs means I can abuse and control you?
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 11:04 AM
16

It wasn't a "joke", it was a vulgar, public shittest. If you let her get away with that kind of public disrespect, things can only go downhill. It was also her cheering on the challenger - I know a few guys that would've immediately gone to blows at the suggestion alone. Her playing along is a slap in the face. And even if she was being "funny", it probably wasn't completely a joke - a woman knows that participating in any discussion like this is a signal of interest in the other guy. She may no…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 12:35 PM
5

30, no maternal instinct and still buying the feminist bullshit? Lost cause. If you've unicornified her and are adamant about staying, be careful of a late-stage change of plans. I've seen it twice amongst friends. One was a woman who put it off to the very last minute, so she could maximize all the "freedoms" and "career opportunities" the modern woman strives for - she strung the husband along until she was 37. The other finally relented to keep her provider around, I think, because she was 35…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 06:39 PM
1

Most people don't care who a woman has sex with. Apparently you really aren't paying attention.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/14 08:25 AM
3

You're shitting on people for not excelling financially, in a thread focused on criticising a woman who is excelling financially. Is this woman someone to look up to, simply because she makes above the average? Is an honorable guy busting his ass who hasn't found a high-paying job someone to look down on because he makes less than her? There are a lot of measures of merit, but how much money you have, by itself, isn't one of them.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 09:15 PM
4

I don't get it. Then you aren't paying attention. Crying fake "rape" is for the most part without consequences, brings the crier instant attention and sympathy from peers, is fashionable and condoned by the media and academia (encouraged, actually), and is the most effective violence a woman can perform without a gun. Where a man might act on his anger with fists, a woman can use "rape." As for the "going to trouble" - it isn't trouble if it gets attention and/or vindictive retribution, or shift…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 02:27 PM
7

It's illegal for enlistedmen to disobey a command. The fault lies with the scumbag politicians pandering for votes, not with the guys following orders.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 01:04 PM
6

She was raped and all but 1 of her friends were too. What is the definition of "rape" she's using?
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 01:01 PM
6

This is a first-world problem, dependent on things being good - it's fine to waste time with silly nonsense like this, changing rules, committees discussing "gender balance," everyone playing along with the obvious charade, etc. when there is no war. It gives the humanities professors and the media something to screech about, and keeps management busy making powerpoints and rulebooks. But if shit ever really hit the fan again with a real war, and millions of actual lives and battle victories wer…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 12:55 PM
3

They've got that covered - try telling a judge that she doesn't deserve half, just because you didn't sign your name. If that worked, everybody would do it.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 11:57 AM
8

It seems like all someone a woman has to do is decide on a whim Try and find some men who are getting $52k from their ex-wives to sit on their asses all day.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 11:54 AM
15

50% of earners make less than $27k. It's neither uncommon nor "embarassing". http://www.mybudget360.com/how-much-do-americans-earn-what-is-the-average-us-income/
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 11:52 AM
13

She's receiving about 10 THOUSAND dollars more than the average American salary. It's even worse - the average household income in 2011 was 69k - that includes both spouses and is skewed by a small group of super-rich who make disproportionately more. A better measure is the median individual salary - in 2011, 50% of the individual earners made less than $27k. So she's at double the median, for doing nothing. Not a bad payoff for walking down an aisle and letting a guy take care of you for 10 ye…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 11:48 AM
3

Treat 'em mean, keep 'em keen.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 02:29 PM
6

she wants someone she can be proud of. She wants someone other women want.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 02:28 PM
5

SHe will do what she can to get you interested, she will make those first months so fucking wonderful you can't explain it. Then, as time sets in, she will start to unfold her plan. I do not believe that this is a conscious thing. That's the case with all of them - the only difference is that the single mother's situation is a bit more urgent.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 04:44 PM
5

And the kind of women I attract by following everything on here just aren't the kind of women I'm looking to get involved with for anything more than a quick fuck. And when you finally do get that special unicorn, you'll find out, eventually, that she is no different than the "quick fucks" you disparage - except she will cost you a hell of a lot more.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/14 05:48 PM
40

They'll bitch no matter what you say. You could write up the most eloquent essay full of qualifications and thoughtful compliments on the endlessly fascinating qualities of the fairer sex, but so much as a whiff of TRP and you're a rapist/misogynist/patriarch/blah/blah/etc. Who gives a fuck, it's all just noise from shallow fools.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 10:50 AM
10

For a lot of guys it's not worth working their asses off for very little return. And it really is a very small return, relative to the cost in money, time, effort, stress, and foregone opportunities. Most men do it out of biological urge, but apart from that, the whole charade is a huge, unpleasant waste of resources.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 08:53 PM
14

“Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power.” -- Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865), And most women will fail that test. Modern Western legal, academic, and media systems have bent over backwards to shift as much power as possible to women, and have reached the point over the past 30 years that it is rather unbalanced in favor of women. What women, generally, do with that power is obvious to anyone looking.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 08:44 PM
1

As usual, it comes down to how you define "success" - some success is character-dependent, some isn't. Winning a lottery ticket isn't the same as saving a baby from a burning building.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 03:14 PM
0

Half the time women who are attracted to wealth and success As opposed the ones that aren't?
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 03:10 PM
1

The goal is attention. Celebrities are the leaders at getting attention. Being a slut only matters if it impacts the ability to get attention.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 03:13 PM
1

There's a common theme to all of your questions - you are waking out of the haze of a demented worldview that has been manipulating you away from happiness, and you now ask for guidance in how to follow a contrary worldview. What am I supposed to do?, How am I supposed to act?, Whose advice do I need to follow?, Is X approved?, etc. Sure, you should continue to ask and analyze, but at some point you will have to realize that the guidance toward your own happiness can only come from you. You will…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 06:51 PM
5

And in complete ignorance of the fact that that which they seek to destroy is the life blood of men that they would desire... They don't desire the men, they desire the men's attention and wealth/protection.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 02:51 PM
0

AWALT, example No. 187385933
/r/TheRedPill23/11/14 02:00 PM
1

She thinks like a child, that the world exists only in relation to her. The significance of the situation is that someone lost a mother, because she is a mother. The impact on the son, as an independent individual, is beyond her view because it doesn't relate to her.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 09:56 AM
27

she starts nagging that shes tired and wants to leave. There you have it in a nutshell. Me, me, me, me. That's the sum total of the support, sacrifice, and empathy you should expect. And odds are that if shit ever really hit the fan, those guys in the bar would be there for you before, and after, the nagging bitch already forgot about you.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 09:51 AM
2

And what do you gain from that? Does your anger change anything? Can it ever? Does it make sense to scream and shout at clouds when it's raining? It is wasted energy that could be used on something beneficial, and negativity that infects other things you do.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 09:40 AM
3

Fuck feminism. No, seriously. Most laughable, hateful, and inexcusable ideology currently being accepted by a majority of the population. Popular aggressive "feminism" is pushed by the media, the way they push hysteria over diseases and crime statistics, as a means to drum up controversy and attention. It is pushed by career academics, as a means to invent things to talk and be outraged about. It is pushed by the corporate world, as a means to avoid lawsuits. But actually "accepted," as in truly…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 09:00 AM
28

Or even: "Ha, if you were hot, you wouldn't be begging for a ride"
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 02:31 PM
1

If you're going into a marriage, you're taking on a lot of contact with these people - holidays, emergencies, grandkid time, etc. And if you want to reduce stress and run things as smoothly as possible, the last thing you want is a pissed off bitch of a mother-in-law throwing sand in the works at every chance, undermining you, feeding ideas to her daughter, etc. Whatever misery the wife will bring, times ten.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 09:41 PM
5

A millionaire doesn't need to beg in the street.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 02:44 PM
8

If there are any real 8/9s there, they are just fucking around for giggles and attentionwhoring, or psychos. No sane woman with better options would resort to using a hookup site.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 02:43 PM
1

Those who do not have sexual outlets are more likely to commit deviancy because it's a natural urge or need that will build and find an outlet, if normal outlets are forsworn, they will find a different one. That is a very interesting point. Indeed it could be a factor.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/14 11:34 PM
1

The problem is not that the prohibition of sex makes them gay, it's that they have had a large amount of community respect and trust, and therefore those of them who are predatory have had opportunity, and their abuses have had a much larger impact. There is a percentage of men who are predatory homosexuals across the population, but not many of them have had positions of such authority or have been trusted with the welfare of children. And because of their occupation and stated "morality," abus…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/14 09:54 PM
5

Militant feminism is a tactic for ugly women who cannot compete for attention. Women who are desired (and therefore have men competing to support, pamper, and give them things in exchange for their beauty) don't respond by trying to destroy men, they respond by manipulating them.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 02:07 PM
2

Also think about how much the average American woman would have to step up her game in order for men to be able to tell her apart from the new professional class of whores. Which is why prostitution is criminalized. You have to wonder if it would still be illegal if we turned the clock back 80 years to when women couldn't vote.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 03:46 PM
1

Sinatra did it, and half the women in America, his way.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 08:12 PM
2

True, but Pfiefer wasn't just hypergamous, she was essentially a whore. She didn't pretend to be in love with them or ply them with lies about her emotions, she openly went where the money was.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 08:08 PM
6

Your primal instincts also tell you to eat doritos until you're sick and then shoot heroin. If you can function without them, you can function in the absence of women too.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 11:32 PM
7

Playing the woe-is-me victim and whining for attention and sympathy is not going to lift you out of whatever hole you're in. Nobody is going to do it for you, and talking will do nothing. The only way is to identify your goal, then find one thing that will get you closer to your goal, and do it right now. Don't talk about it or think about it, do it. Then repeat.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 11:28 PM
3

Pretty strong projection bias - you're predicting the behaviour of 350 million people based on the posts of a few thousand anonymous posters on a single website. And the article is similar, trying to suggest a mass psychological shift and new "trends" in an entire nation based on a single company and a couple of anecdotes.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 03:55 PM
41

This is one blog post, by one woman, on one obscure website. If you let what she says affect what you think about humanity as a whole, you're as nuts as she is.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 12:48 PM
1

Sophistry. No, you didn't say that, in quotes. But you implied that her temperature being a degree off was enough to remove suspicions. Any fever, or any symptoms at all, in someone who had just fucking touched Ebola should be enough for a reasonable health care worker to at least acknowledge the possibility of having it, and given the tremendous possible consequences, do what they can to avoid putting others in danger.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 10:07 PM
0

it is still interesting to consider how differently others would respond if the wife's and husband's roles were reversed. The response would be: "no shit".
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 02:14 PM
1

Women know instinctively that sex is how they control men Every woman doles out sex as a reward for obedience or in return for support, and restricts it as punishment - the only ones that don't are those with personality disorders.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 02:10 PM
3

saying "UGH, it's unbelievable how men think they're ENTITLED to sex all the time!" And then posted one immediately after that about an older woman who was sad because no one found her attractive anymore. There's no conflict between the two, in their twisted minds - they're both justified by the woman's immense sense of entitlement. They have been trained to believe that they deserve whatever they want. The frigid wife deserves to be provided for without the need for sex on her part, because she…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 02:02 PM
1

We're not talking about some random person with the sniffles - this woman had direct fucking physical contact with ebola, a few days before developing ebola symptoms. On top of that, she works in health care. As hard as you try, you can't spin that as "well, they had no reason at all to suspect....".
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 12:42 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=409Pjtq7jzY
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 06:11 PM
2

Indoctrination is a hell of a drug. It motivates men to murder each other on battlefields to make corporate executives rich, it makes men blow themselves up to avenge insults to a religious leader, it makes men sacrifice their lives to the futile effort of pleasing a woman.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 02:10 PM
0

It is a central tenet that what women say they want and what they actually do want are very different things. That is a misrepresentation. It may be dishonest, or not, depending on the situation.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 06:53 PM
0

Again, note the part "for sex's sake" - meaning, they don't have the same desire for just the physical act by itself, but more for the affection, attention, and results of the sex (control over the man and his resources). They may enjoy it, but not without the other elements being present.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 06:51 PM
3

If women wanted sex, just for the sex, there would be as many male strip clubs as there are female ones, and there would be male prostitutes standing on street corners. She doesn't care about the alpha's schlong, she wants the alpha's attention, status, property, and to use his control over other people.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 03:13 PM
-5

And since by default and definition single parents have bad judgement, you can expect whatever charity you intend towards a child to be wasted or squandered at least partially. That is a wildly overbroad and pretentious statement - there are many reasons for divorce which have nothing to do with judgement. This entire sub depends on the premise that people, and women in particular, misrepresent themselves and their motives. And I'd bet that every guy reading this has been duped and manipulated b…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 01:57 PM
6

She doesn't want it at all. She wants the result of it - attention, committment, or a child. If women wanted sex, for sex's sake, human beings would do nothing else.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 01:28 PM
2

I'm surprised the top comment isn't that she should call the police because her being drunk meant it was RAPE. I only read 2 or 3 comments though, so I would assume it's in there somewhere.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 10:13 AM
5

never fucking shack up/move in with/sign a lease with a woman you are not married to. It's literally the fastest way to dry up a woman's vagina. And marrying them, then moving in, dries them just as fast.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 06:30 PM
7

WHAT the fuck goes through their fucking heads when they say "Lets just be friends". Translated: I'm going for the higher-value guy, but in case he changes his mind and doesn't commit to my support, I want to have a backup.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 06:27 PM
6

why she sexually assaulted you without permission. The proper term is "rape" - or better, "RAPE!!"
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 03:09 PM
8

From their point of view, like everything else, "rape" is an emotion not an act. If they feel bad, that is "rape".
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:04 PM
6

Easy for you to say when you're not the one facing prison, bankruptcy, and a lifelong sexual predator tag.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 12:58 PM
3

They are not attracted to muscles - they are attracted to the power suggested by the muscles. And it is just suggestion - it has to be backed up by proof of that power, proof that he uses it to dominate other men. Some "jacked" guys are powerful, some aren't. A large percentage of bodybuilders are, despite their perfect physiques, whimpering betas, hopelessly insecure, obsessed with diets and cosmetics, and fixated on their own appearance. Those traits will not attract women, no matter how "jack…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 01:03 PM
1

Maybe the new guy's potential has topped out, and she's feeling around to see if there are more lucrative betas to attach herself to.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 06:31 PM
1

That wouldn't matter to the women - they don't do it for the sex, they do it for the attention. If you removed sex completely, the attention competition would just have one less event.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 01:14 PM
5

If you get drunk and kill someone with your car - you're a criminal. If a woman gets drunk and has sex - she's a victim.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 01:06 PM
2

everyone is a rapist. That would be a preferable outcome - once they have overreached and overhyped it to the point where nearly everyone is a criminal, the label loses its meaning.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 01:05 PM
9

What do you do when a dog barks at you? Argue with it? Post weeping Internet posts defending yourself? Morons say lots of things. Who gives a shit.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 08:50 AM
6

Let's talk about our hypocrisies and broken behaviors instead of staying silent. That may have motivated her. But the statement is still hypocritical given her actions - she earns obscene amounts of money for being attractive, she spends energy cultivating and marketing that attractiveness, she poses for sexy photos and wears revealing clothes - then she lectures others that they are evil and base for buying what she's selling. As for "our behaviors", I don't see what is "broken", or how it coul…
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 06:44 PM
9

Men, would you rather date Scarlett Johanssen, or a waitress that looked exactly like Scarlett Johanssen? Is there a third option?
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 03:53 PM
5

Of course they're going to parade women up there to get money for poor women around the world then do nothing. That's an unfair accusation. That money goes to fund tens of thousands of expensed gourmet meals, hotels, private jet flights, escorts, coke dealers, and construction projects granted to family and friends.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 03:43 PM
72

Rejecting "gender stereotypes" is great - as long as it only applies to everyone else. Along with the obvious contradiction in the fact that the only reason she is given a chance to lecture others to "reject gender stereotypes" is that she fits the stereotypical beautiful woman gender stereotype. If she were the stereotypical hambeast lesbian with a crew cut and neck tattoos, nobody would give a shit what she said.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 03:33 PM
1

What about though, women who ask a question because they're simply wanting to know the answer? Then it's not a shit-test. There is a reason the term "shit-test" was coined, when the word "question" already existed. Case in point - your attempts to minimize and scoff at this topic, to characterize it as a kind of juvenile temper tantrum acted out by all the small-minded, immature male losers who can't compete at the level of the mature and superior woman. You are not looking for "answers," you ar…
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 02:11 PM
6

Just because the campus feminists are selling their BS doesn't mean you have to buy it. They can screech and rant all they want, you decide who you're with.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 06:41 PM
1

Men have been asking that for a long time. In Greek mythology, Pandora was the first human woman created by the gods, specifically by Hephaestus and Athena on the instructions of Zeus ... Zeus ordered Hephaestus to mold her out of earth as part of the punishment of humanity for Prometheus' theft of the secret of fire, and all the gods joined in offering her "seductive gifts". ... When she first appears before gods and mortals, "wonder seized them" as they looked upon her. But she was "sheer guil…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 09:52 PM
8

I don't know. He died over 10 years ago, and I haven't spoken to the wife or kids since. The kids are now mid-to-late teens. If they ever ask me, I'll tell them what I know - but as for contacting them I'm torn. Part of me wants to give them the truth and counter what I'm sure has been a lifetime of lies from their mother - but the other part thinks that they've already suffered through losing their dad, and dredging up all this can only hurt them more.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 07:43 PM
2

Dorms, fraternity houses, school sports teams, shared bachelor pads - ask any man who was in one of those to compare it to the joys of "growing up" and living with a woman.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 07:30 PM
7

The flaw is in forming the expectation, or hope, that they will be something that they are not.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 07:23 PM
12

I would give anything for it to be bullshit. The guy was a childhood friend of mine. We were close enough for me to get the real truth from him. His getting sick was tragedy enough, but I had to witness the reality of what his wife did, which I think was much worse than the illness from his point of view. Towards the end, he was pretty much confined to bed - all he did was talk on and on about how much he missed his kids, and how sorry he was that he had let them down. It was the most gut-wrench…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 07:08 PM
82

don't get so sick that you are unable to work and take care of your wife. She will make your life miserable with accusations and then kick you out to go and die with your family. I've seen this scenario play out several times within the group of people I know personally. In the worst one, a guy had provided for 10+ years, typical good guy husband, works his ass off to keep her in comfort, complete support, obedient, helps with the kids, vacations and jewelry gifts, day care to give her time for …
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 02:06 PM
9

Especially when "mistakes" is a euphemism for "sucking as many dicks as possible".
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 08:38 AM
4

A very astute and succinct summary of the situation. A follow-up would be that it is negative for both genders, on average. It leaves both less fulfilled and unhappier. This is a relatively new model, being pushed as fashionable by the pop-media only for the past couple of generations - it will be interesting to see how long they continue to push it, or if at some point there will be a propaganda shift in the opposite direction, back toward the "traditional" marriage model.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 08:12 AM
4

A billionaire can be an obese hunchback with leprosy and still have any woman he chooses.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 08:00 AM
0

Yes, you're right I've seen some positive talk about that. But I would guess that it's been supported by the angsty-teenager frustrated PUA hopeful types here, the way little boys fantasize about war - because anyone who actually knows what narcissism is would never wish it upon themselves. Narcissism is a crippling disorder that totally consumes someone's life, poisoning all relationships and keeping them constantly running in circles in a pathetic search for validation. My take on "putting you…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 07:37 PM
0

Where does TRP "preach narcissism"?
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 12:09 PM
1

The folks who are suggesting putting their wife down sound like insecure assholes. This is your wife for Christ's sake, not some bar floozy. NAWALT, right?
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 08:56 AM
1

The inability to admit you were wrong is a very strong motivator. And once you buy into the fantasy, you can come up with all kinds of nonsensical reasons to avoid the obvious signs you were duped. This is basically a Nigerian 419 scam for attention instead of cash.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 12:33 PM
0

Once you get there, please let us know what's so great about having a harem of older chicks.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 12:55 PM
2

The percentage of fools is constant, and always will be. The only changes have been to social mobility and the removal of stigma around sex. In the past men were pressured to marry in exchange for sex - now the pop-media encourages girls to whore themselves at every opportunity. Given the options of paying for sex by trapping yourself into marriage, or getting the sex without the contract, the choice is clear.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 12:53 PM
14

And what are you going to "win", exactly? At best, you get some childish pleasure by surprising her or putting her in an awkward position, while giving her new motives to retaliate and/or go psycho. And then what - do you get some kind of award, is your life better in any way? Do you earn anything by treating a piece of shit like a piece of shit? You already know the situation - any more time spent with her is wasted resources you could be putting into improving your life elsewhere. Tell her to …
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 02:29 PM
4

Think of a group of catty girls in high school sitting around typing nonsense to each other into cellphones and criticizing any girl who isn't within earshot for hours on end. Now imagine them taking a few minutes a day to schedule interviews. That's HR.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 12:37 PM
5

But even if it would be preponderance of evidence, it could still leave the chances at say 30%. And where you do get your "probability" from? Upon what do you base your right to destroy this guy's life? Pathetic CYA and easy way out weaseling like this is what helped create the mess we're in today. You are as responsible as any wild-eyed screeching feminist if you give in to their bullshit. If there is no evidence that the guy slept with her, then there is as much "probability" that someone is f…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 11:58 AM
6

I mean, at this point in time, I would just start privately recording your day. Data storage is cheap enough. That is a great idea - as we get cheaper "google glass" type devices and cellphones, wearable cameras, etc., that may be a viable way to protect yourself. It's a miserable prospect to think of recording every moment and treating everyone with suspicion, but that's the reality of the horribly-biased system we've built. Currently, any private interaction with a woman or a child is essentia…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 11:48 AM
4

A great write-up. All of the points can be summarized by saying you need to treat women in a relationship as a good father would treat his children. With authority, stability, and compassion, but without weakness or neediness. A child isn't equipped to support or control his father, or to fix his emotional weaknesses, or to deal with drama from him. The same is true for women. And both will quickly lose respect for a man who acts like their servant or their friend.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 10:16 PM
3

Agreed. I detest text messages and fb and all the smartphone "social media" bullshit. I don't use them, with anyone. If they want to contact me, they can call on a telephone. I need to communicate by email for work, but outside of work I try to avoid that, too.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 10:07 PM
16

Do I get "credit" for doing so from anybody besides you guys? Yes, from your children, the most important people involved. They may not realize it yet, but they will. Doing your best under the cirumstances to improve their lives is the responsibilty of a father. Many don't live up to it as you have.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 07:37 PM
-2

Honor and accountability are not highly regarded in our culture. I don't buy that. They are not promoted as fashionable by the NY/LA-centered pop media, but that doesn't allow a conclusion that the culture doesn't value them. particularly in the part of the country between the coasts.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 11:50 AM
11

He cited it for its general restriction of women's legal rights. As an alternative you may find more acceptable than islam, women couldn't vote in the US until 1920, in France until 1944, and not until 1971 in Switzerland. It may be worth considering what the motives for that policy were, even in the most advanced democracies of the world.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 11:46 AM
20

Equating women with Mt. Everest and portraying them as some kind of valuable goal in and of themselves is a white-knight beta fantasy. Women are not the conquest - they are a side-effect of the conquest.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 09:08 AM
6

Please tell me they are and that a majority of women don't actually think like this. You must be new here.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 07:57 AM
2

No, it's similar to being a grammarnazi douchebag.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 01:56 PM
3

Citation needed.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 01:51 PM
1

Where is there anything about "devaluing intelligence"? All I saw was a lame attempt at reddit dork humor. Attributing some insult to intelligence based on "banana" seems like quite a stretch, especially for someone so keen on lecturing others not to impute meaning to fit an agenda.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 01:49 PM
15

After humans received the stolen gift of fire from Prometheus, an angry Zeus decides to give humanity a punishing gift to compensate for the boon they had been given. He commands Hephaestus to mold from earth the first woman, a "beautiful evil" whose descendants would torment the human race. ... When she first appears before gods and mortals, "wonder seized them" as they looked upon her. But she was "sheer guile, not to be withstood by men." Hesiod elaborates (590–93): From her is the race of wo…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 07:51 AM
6

http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/bill-clinton/images/9773773/title/young-bill-hillary-photo
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 07:41 AM
26

“Don't mistake my kindness for weakness. I am kind to everyone, but when someone is unkind to me, weak is not what you are going to remember about me.” - Al Capone
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 08:47 AM
6

Hell has a VIP section reserved for women that choose the new guy over their own children.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 11:57 AM
0

And if the dudes she was hitting on had turned out to be losers, it would have been your fault for not paying enough attention to her.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 05:30 PM
3

Banging her is a losing proposition - she's manipulative and hostile, apparently crazy, associates with degenerates, and you had to degrade yourself for it. Then you have the risks of her going full-psycho on you, guaranteed further manipulation attempts, the dirtbag ex-boyfriend playing toughguy, the whole thing's a mess. Your time is better spent elsewhere. If getting laid is your goal, there are plenty of higher-quality prospects. Put your resources into improving yourself instead of scraping…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 10:19 AM
7

Bringing another guy along is the equivalent of her slapping him in the face and spitting on him in public - it's a giant shittest or some kind of manipulative power game, or both. The moment you argue with it or try to defend your position you buy into it, and therefore lose. It's an unwinnable situation, no matter how you try to play it. The only winning reaction is to cut it off completely and refuse to participate.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 07:55 AM
2

It boils down to the relationship with the first man in her life, the father. If he was abusive, distant, drunk, religious fanatic, or left the house, run.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 10:14 AM
2

Beauty. If she's hot enough a guy loses all capacity for rational thought. The amount of time, money, effort, and happiness lost in chasing beautiful women is at least as sickening as the worst female hamstering.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 10:07 AM
3

That sounds cool and hip when you're 20, but the question is whether you have the same values at 40.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 12:51 PM
15

I couldn't care less about what people do with their own lives. If being fat brings them happiness, good for them. But what I do object to is being ordered to modify my own life to accomodate them and to coddle their insecurities. I object to being prosecuted for "hate crimes" for identifying them as fat, or fired or forced to undergo corporate "sensitivity" training, or to have my children indoctrinated into their religion of weakness by schools.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 12:43 PM
9

Render yourself sterile just to bang some carousel whore? Not exactly the best tradeoff.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 08:17 AM
1

Today, many women brag about their partner count to each other, don't give a fuck documenting all her previous boyfriends in public social media, and engage in "prude" shaming. Many women also deface themselves with tattoos - and like being a whore, just because it's a media-driven fad doesn't mean it won't have dire consequences in the future. Human nature is human nature, and there are deep reasons for universal cultural norms. Those don't change just because some morons in hollywood think it …
/r/TheRedPill15/05/14 10:04 AM
1

How the fuck can I be good to a girl Depends on how you define "good" - if it's the sitcom version, pedestalizing her as a special snowflake, giving her money and gifts and confiding your insecurities to her in and tolerating her BPD manias and hamstering nonsense, you can't be surprised when you get rooked and cheated on. And you can trust her, as long as you trust her as a woman - she doesn't value the things you value, her perspective and instinctual drives are different than yours. Don't exp…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/14 09:55 AM
2

Don't take my lame joke as meaning that it's impossible - I'm sure that faithful and respectful women are out there, and I hope you've got one. Just that the weight of experience has taught that it's best to always be alert to the possibility, to be realistic, and to have a plan on how to handle it.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 08:41 PM
3

My current gf, she is a lot different than my ex, and I know that she wouldn't cheat on me, Oh, so she's the one.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 07:51 PM
0

Unicorn hunter here.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 09:38 AM
1

I disagree - while most people won't be there if things really go bad, it is possible for a man to find real male friends he can count on. Few, absolutely, but it is possible. Women, however, can never be counted on completely. Not that they can't be honest or good people, but there is a fundamental disconnect in the way males and females view honor and duty that makes them impossible to truly depend on. Women realize this, and will constantly try to destroy those friendships - to reduce his res…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 09:32 AM
1

That is exactly the wrong response if you are confident in your position. Only weak arguments and lies need to be protected by banning opposing views. Just look at reddit - one thing all the subs devoted to ridiculous theories and propaganda (feminism, PC, politics, etc.) have in common is an instant circlejerk and banning of anything that questions their beliefs. If you really believe in the argument, you should welcome attacks on it.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 08:26 AM
1

It depends on what you mean, exactly, by "social construct" - if it is in the broad sense of humans adapting their behaviour to other humans, that doesn't conflict with what I said. If you mean it in the tumblr-patriarchy, evil-male-cabal-conspiracy sense, it doesn't merit discussion. I'm sure that male-female interaction differed to some degree pre-civilization, but the broad outlines seem the same - if females didn't need to seek the protection of males as hunter-gatherers, how did they become…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 09:51 PM
3

They can - hence the words "assume" and "hope". Some people are just born bad, and they're bad as kids. However, in my experience, in the vast majority of cases if the kids make you miserable it's the parents' fault, not the kids'.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 09:19 PM
3

LOL, way too much time suffering through illogical bullshit and propaganda and asking "why?" - what everybody here is doing. On this topic you can start here and then some reading on "parental investment" etc. And I'd echo Ochreata's suggestion above - the ancients figured it out long ago, and when it comes to humans and human interaction, nothing has changed a bit since then. There's a famous line, paraphrased, that says "everything after Plato is a footnote" - that's pretty close to summing it…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 07:47 PM
2

A decade of my life has been wasted. I assume you don't feel that way about your children, or at least I hope not.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 07:31 PM
48

I feel that many women love the idea of having a guy as an emotional sack to kick around, It's instinctual. Imagine you are a female primate living in a small group in a cave a million years ago. No technology, few basic weapons, and you're weaker than the males. At any moment a lion could come in looking for dinner. Or a group of primate males from another group, or even your own group, can barge in and carry you off to rape and enslave you. There are no laws or courts or police to protect you.…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 12:56 PM
4

Bullshit. Age is not a selection criterion for women - power and wealth are. Clooney has both in spades.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 04:53 PM
3

Because there are so few of them - and that's because biologically for the majority of women, in order to have defined abs they need to either be manically-obsessed fitness fanatics or on steroids, or both. Physically it's not a bad problem to have, but if you think the average woman is narcissistic and self-absorbed, try dealing with one that spends 6 hours a day in a gym staring at herself in the mirror.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 04:43 PM
0

You can bitch and snark all you want that the obvious isn't obvious, but that doesn't make it so.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 04:29 PM
10

They get it just fine. They do what they've always done, what instinct drives them to do. The man who thinks they will ignore that instinct because some bitter ivy-league cunts wrote articles saying they should is the one who doesn't get it.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 10:23 AM
4

There is a middle way, for example: "Do you mind if I kiss you?" I'm as far as you can get from being a woman, and I confess to not understanding much of what goes on in their heads, but that suggestion makes even me cringe in disgust.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 10:18 AM
8

It seems strange because it contradicts the PC charade we have adopted in the past 50 years. Acknowledging the obvious instinct of a woman to gravitate to men most likely to support and protect them while doing the least possible in return is now labeled as taboo, like racist jokes or looting and pillaging. Obviously this labeling doesn't eliminate the instinct, or acting on it, it just prohibits acknowledging it openly.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 10:07 AM
2

Sickening. Guilty until proven innocent. Sorry to hear your story, and I hope you and your kids come out of it OK.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 11:12 PM
1

There must be more to this story - even in a system as unjust and biased as the current one, it's hard to imagine they forbid you all access to your children based solely on an unbacked lie from an ex-wife. If that's all it is, find another lawyer.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 10:18 PM
1

Phillip has learned how to remain a virgin.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 01:09 PM
3

He's right - women don't care about cars or guitars.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 01:07 PM
2

That's a lot of wasted energy. It would be better spent in improving yourself, rather than thinking about tearing others down.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 12:20 PM
13

You can have a sexual partner, a wife, a sister, a mother, or you can have female colleagues, but a man can never be friends with a woman in the true sense of the word.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 12:03 PM
6

From what I've read TRP advertises practically the opposite- that men who sleep around are more manly and more respected. You should keep reading. Or troll elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 08:20 AM
3

Why exactly is his view more "narrow" than, for example, yours?
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 07:54 AM
4

This story is missing some details. How exactly did the guy rape her without her getting even a glance at him, in a high school bathroom? The logistics of doing that are pretty complicated.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 09:04 AM
2

Trolling.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 08:00 AM
3

EDIT: But maybe we're talking about the same thing, after all. I think we are - I'm just saying she'd take pleasure in destroying him in the process.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 10:43 PM
1

Why would he need to do that? Would his kids having a negative view of their mother improve his life? Would giving his whore wife even a second more attention somehow help him? He should focus on being the best father he can be. That his wife is a cunt is an obstacle, not a means for scoring points.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 10:38 PM
1

Somebody hasn't browsed r/relationships.... This guy's Conan the Barbarian compared to some of the weeping eunuchs over there.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 10:31 PM
4

If he stuck around long enough, she would eventually blow a guy in front of him. Just to bottom out the humiliation screw and experience the thrill of completely destroying him.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 10:24 PM
16

Your wife is always, always a few drinks and a 30 minute chat with a guy she perceives as superior away from cheating on you. This is the sad, vile, infuriating, and absolute truth.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 10:20 PM
9

"How do I look" is hamsterish for "Tell me I'm beautiful". Always.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 10:07 AM
122

Men succeed by dominating others. Women succeed by attracting men. It's always been that way. The only new thing is that in the past 50 years western societies have decided to play a deranged game where we all pretend it's not that way, then punish each other for not following the rules.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 08:56 PM
-3

We get it. Post-adolescent existential crisis, anomie and nihilistic angst. All you need now is a poetry journal and some black fingernail polish. You aren't novel or insightful - this shit is about the only thing more cliche than the alpha-chasing and hypergamy parodied here every day. And you're an insecure coward - if you had strength in your convictions, you wouldn't need to preach and desperately troll the Internet for attention.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 07:50 PM
3

People get mad because man has an instinctual loathing of weakness and hopelessness, without which the species would have died out long ago. We are here because thousands of generations of men fought and persevered through horrors we can't imagine, they battled and struggled to give us a chance to live. To scoff at that and dismiss it with some bullshit about "futility" and "pointlessness" is an insult to that stuggle and to the rest of us that are still struggling.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 08:37 AM
4

Then do something. That is not a platitude. I mean actually DO something. Stop thinking about it, stop rehearsing all the possible negatives that can occur, stop dwelling on all the failures and missed opportunities. Thinking about it will not change it - action is required. Action builds momentum, making the next action easier. And it works in the other direction - inaction destroys momentum. Don't try to map out every single thing you need to do in advance, just focus on the first thing. Take …
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 08:20 AM
6

The most recent ad hominem against me: Do you get upset when a dog barks at you? Do you question your value when a toddler says he doesn't like you? Meaningless people say meaningless things. If what they say upsets you, it is because of the value YOU put on what they say.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 08:05 AM
4

Awesome. A witty, provocative, open-ended comment. This is the part where people tell you that you're wrong, so you can lay out all your brilliant, novel reasons why you're right and demonstrate to everybody how enlightened and insightful you are. These dumb brutes don't even know how dumb they are, they need a special person like you to tell them. Teach them, waldson - show them how important and smart you are. You have value, get the attention you deserve.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 10:55 AM
3

pandering to her neediness, emotional instability, righteousness, and insecurities. I was apologizing left and right, revoking my beliefs, and just generally being a fucking wimp because the conflict was so exhausting and constant. That encapsulates the majority of long-term relationships. At some point the guy has to choose between a) giving up the fight, accepting it as unwinnable, and doing the minimum required to just stop the bitching, or b) going through the trouble of finding another woma…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 10:46 AM
2

She's not doing anything wrong by enjoying sex in her youth. The whole point of the thread is that, yes, she was apparently doing something "wrong".
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 10:34 AM
5

Her goal was to live out some cosmo-magazine fantasy bullshit of traveling to "exotic" locales and sipping cocktails on the beach. Funny that her conclusion wasn't that she had to find a way to earn a lot of money to pay for that, but instead that she had to find a man to pay for that for her.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 10:32 AM
0

I don't get it.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 01:41 PM
-2

Believe whatever you want. The point is that religious beliefs aren't relevant to the point being made. Introducing them is unnecessary and weakens the argument, just as your hysterical reaction weakens whatever it is that you are trying to say.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 01:40 PM
-13

Could use a bit less of the euphoric atheism ranting. It's irrelevant to your argument, and only serves to limit it by painting you as another adolescent show-and-telling all the deep thoughts from his existential crisis.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 12:26 PM
1

The fact that most people are predisposed to minimum effort and instant gratification isn't the same as saying that those traits are unavoidable. You seem to be making some kind of deterministic circular argument - those who succeed do so because they choose to succeed, and only those who are born successful would be capable of making those decisions in the first place. By extension, it's all decided at conception. I disagree - life is a series of choices, and the individual is free to choose. T…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 09:42 PM
6

Depends on how you define "smart" - she's got the guy hanging around, second-guessing himself, sacrificing himself to his whore fiancee, and choosing some woman over his own mother. If the therapist's goal was to further the interests of the woman, she seems to have done her job.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 09:31 AM
1

women can even value this more than looks when it comes time to have kids. Any adult woman would choose a billionaire hunchback over a broke Olympic athlete. Power and production capacity are the prime selection criteria. A man's looks are only considered so far as they contribute to those - otherwise they are irrelevant.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 08:39 AM
3

"Swallowing" TRP means, in some sense, a substantial change in ideology. It requires rejecting long-held beliefs and accepting a loss of a lot of fundamental emotional anchors. It can be traumatic and disorienting. People deal with that kind of change over different periods - for some, there is a process like the "stages of grief", going through denial, anger, pleading, depression, before finally just accepting the truth, that what they were raised to believe was very different than reality. You…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 08:27 AM
2

Hope, fear, attachment, insecurity, longing for acceptance - humans are emotional, meaning non-rational. It's easy for you to judge from afar, it's different when your emotions are those controlling the decisions.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 08:13 AM
3

it is luck, because everyone is trying their best. That is absolutely false - most are not trying their best, nowhere near it. Most people are generally lazy, deceptive, and myopic when given the opportunity.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 08:10 AM
1

Nothing is earned, nothing is deserved. That is an overstatement. There are some things within our control, some that aren't - the existence of the latter doesn't mean the former don't exist. You have access to some set of resources - it is up to you to decide to use them or not. That is always your choice to make. Claiming that work, sacrifice, and deferral of instant gratification is the same as just throwing your hands up and saying "fuck it" is absurd.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 08:07 AM
1

I'll practice science right here, where we don't have those problems. And I'll continue to not give a fraction of a fuck about those problems. But that is the point. We don't have those problems precisely because we have people who do give a fuck about them. You may not want to work on them yourself, but that doesn't justify the position that they are meaningless.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 09:56 AM
2

Try practicing science in Congo or Sudan, where people really don't give a shit about all that law and government stuff. Where there's no police, no schools, no laboratories, barely any infrastructure at all. Science doesn't progress very quickly in an environment where all of one's resources must be devoted to staying alive day-to-day. You may find politics to be a waste, but it is a waste that is necessary to free other resources to be applied to things like Science. You can't have one without…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 09:48 AM
1

Well said. Life happens, and it happens to everybody. The difference amongst men is how they interpret the world around them and how they act in response. You can choose to expend energy bitching and complaining, to run away, to ignore it, or to accept it for what it is and respond with what moves you closer to your goals.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 09:41 AM
2

They based a Jason Statham movie on this guy, I think the one where he had to go around chewing on high-tension wires to stay alive.
/r/TheRedPill26/03/14 12:02 AM
4

If she can't separate her personal hysterias from your feelings, she is an incompetent psychologist. Find a new one.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 09:41 AM
10

That's almost every argument with a woman. Most female arguments aren't about finding the best solution to a problem, or resolving some situation - they are about attention and power. You can never win such an argument, because being "right" is not the goal - the point is to have your emotions and attention directed at her, at maximum duration and intensity. The only way to "win" is to not participate. You can then show her the attention she needs once her emotional state is more level.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 09:24 AM
19

Your comment is exactly the opposite of TRP - needy, whiny, approval-seeking, based on the opinions of others, fear in following your own convictions, letting your emotions be dictated by your "friends". Act in accordance with what you believe is right. If your "friends" become catty bitches in response, then find new friends.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 09:08 AM
8

You say that as if there were tons of self-sustaining women out there waiting to be banged with no desire to be sustained in return.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 11:54 AM
2

Do you refer to the romantic idealization of women as the fairer sex, who are just as capable as men were it not for the injustice of their oppressive patriarchal socialization That, along with the general denial of responsibility for unfavorable characteristics. It's sort of a selective blend of chivalry and feminism, where the positive characteristics of each are touted while the mere mention of the negative ones are met with hysterical shout-downs - essentially political correctness. Not only…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 10:26 AM
3

women deserve to be treated like regular human beings? Given that women are 50% of the population, your statement equates to "treat women like men", doesn't it? Do you think women "deserve" to be treated like men?
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 09:34 AM
3

Yes, all else equal, the Olympian is more desirable than the hunchback. But everything else isn't equal, and in the end the physical attractiveness is not the top priority. Power and productive potential will almost always trump looks.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 10:05 AM
11

I really wanted to text back.. "Annoyed? Big fucking surprise" No. Don't resort to passive-aggressive sarcasm and whining. It displays weakness, yields to her, and just encourages more abuse. The better answer is "OK." Then ignore any other messages and go have a good time without her. Hang out with friends, or more appealing women. If you can't do that without her, then there is where you should be focusing your energy. Why do you care about her "terminology"? It's all bullshit. She's pushing b…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 09:56 AM
6

It's a bunch of immature teenagers going through their first existential crisis yelling shallow nonsense at each other.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 09:43 AM
4

The reason why you are so bamboozled about your girlfriend's bullshit behavior is because you have yet to accept that a woman's mind is fundamentally different than a man's mind. ... Your girlfriend is a heinous bitch and you should leave her. Very well stated and incisive - should be sidebar material. The source of the confusion is the difference between expectations and reality - particularly those modern, Western expectations based largely on the propaganda driven by Western popular media and…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 09:33 AM
-3

BPD is a euphemism for "femininity". They all have it to some degree.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 09:23 PM
8

Get solid evidence of the drug use and anything else contributing to instability of your daughter's home life, and talk to a lawyer. Custody agreements can be amended. If your lawyer says there's no point, talk to another lawyer. Is the druggie your ex's boyfiend? Assuming your daughter is still young, this is the most important time of her life in terms of character and personality development. Being separated from her father and having a cunt of a mother is a big enough handicap, but being sub…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 09:16 PM
4

A 4-ft. tall hunchback who happened to inherit a $100 million trust fund is more attractive to modern women than an Olympic athlete, and her offspring would be more secure with the hunchback as well. The preference for health and genetics can be overcome if there are other factors that provide for the woman's security, such as money.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 09:06 PM
1

Steven Tyler is not an "alpha" - he is just famous. Women are attracted to famous people because their primary measure of self-worth is attention, banging a famous guy gives them vicarious attention; and its also a means of competing with other women over who can attract the attention of a small group of famous men. The "alpha genes" idea makes sense from an evolutionary view - for millions of years, "alpha" was a question of strength and physical ability. The strongest and healthiest males will…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 08:57 PM
5

That's absurd. Some POS bastard killed himself, so therefore we should assume that men, by default, need to be monitored while they spend time with their children? Anybody can kill themselves, divorce or not. By your logic all parents, everywhere, need to be monitored at all times.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 08:37 PM
28

The idea that you'd have to be "supervised" while you interact with your own child is infuriating. The woman presumably asked for supervision, or at least is happy to go along with it, making her twice as much of a despicable cunt. This sends a terrible message to the child, that the father is at fault, that he can't be trusted, that her relationship with her father is dependent on the mother's approval. It will have a very strong impact on the child's development - hopefully she eventually sees…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 10:05 AM
4

This girl isn't wife material. That was obvious about half a second after she said "I'm going to bang some other dudes".
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 10:57 AM
5

That's called "having fun like other girls my age" in hamsterish.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 10:44 AM
4

Don't bother unless you just want to troll them. It's a waste of time. Nobody there is looking for reasoning or counterarguments, they will just auto-downvote. Then, they go through the posting history of anybody that calls them out on their circlejerk and then ban anyone who's posted to an "unacceptable" sub (TRP, gun-anything, republicans, etc.).
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 01:56 PM
2

These people are happy to run their stupid gender experiments on kids. That's it. It's easy to dismiss this as silly nonsense spewed by vapid, repulsive feminist-studies types with too much money, screaming at each other for attention. The problem is that those morons, eventually, become kindergarten teachers and school principals, etc. - and being morons, they continue to push that toxic bullshit on impressionable children. It's not huge by itself, but it's another piece in the propaganda machi…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 10:18 AM
15

A woman who has ACTUALLY been raped and physically abused is RARELY so casual or flippant like it's an "ooo.. I'm so in demand and hot that guys even try to rape me" rite of passage bullshit. Exactly - these fools are belittling true victims. An actual rape is incredibly traumatic and significant, not some superficial nonsense to discuss on the first date to keep the attention on yourself after you've run out of poetry journal and cat stories. Same for eating disorders - they are real and people…
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 08:13 PM
54

The interestng thing here is how she characterizes the sex as "free" - as in, OP didn't "pay" for it with the appropriate amount of attention/commitment/whatever. And then, having given away this sex for free, she characterizes herself as "cheap". It almost sounds as if she performed the sex to get something in return. Of course we know better, that women have sex because they like it, because they enjoy the act itself as much as the guy does, in which case she wouldn't be expecting anything in …
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 08:59 AM
2

It's got little to do with being hot. They'll go for an obese humpback if he's famous or rich enough.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 05:27 PM
24

There's another definition of "man up" - it could be that OP should act as a man should, and according to what apparently nobody else in his life has any of: self-respect and honor. This situation is a deception and insult beyond what any man should tolerate. Any action beyond cutting off these scum off instantly would require him to debase himself and destroy his self-worth.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 05:16 PM
10

Why, because it's the guy's fault? He's moving in and taking her against her will? She's the one who set it up. Chances are he didn't even know the situation.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 11:48 PM
3

But, even worse, there is nothing to remember. She really does believe that she did it. Her bitching/bribing a guy into doing some thing is her solution. It's her using her resources to get what she wants, just like a guy may use his muscle power to build something.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 02:11 PM
4

The implication is that the guy that pleases her should be willing to trade sex for "intellectual conversation" with the vapid moron that wrote this masterpiece of inanity. Not exactly a great bargain.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 02:06 PM
6

Everybody that interviews you has some power Thanks for the brilliant insight, but that is why I said "everybody". Don't assume that just because you don't take the 22 year-old female poly-sci grad's opinion seriously, she doesn't have power over the application.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 09:54 AM
2

In fairness, if she had been honest and said that she was a slut who had banged hundreds of guys, you would have viewed her differently, and the chances of you giving her the attention she sought would have been less. The deception isn't justified, but there is a reason for it.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 09:44 AM
1

Very attractive women almost invariably have low self-esteem - for most, their view of themselves is inseparable from their looks. They receive praise and attention for them since early childhood, it becomes their way of measuring success. The problem is that not only do looks fade, but they're subjective - so not only do these women view their value as constantly declining after 18, but they have no objective, concrete reference to rely on. Their whole sense of self-worth is dependent on the va…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 09:39 AM
5

"Well that doesn't count because I don't want them to hit on me." The mental gymnastics required to produce that are just baffling.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 09:21 AM
38

I've listened, more than once, to a gaggle of mid-20s HR females at a very large corp. laughing while comparing notes on which guys were hottest amongst the screen interviews they did, and how certain resumes "accidentally" ended up in the trash and how some names "somehow" got skipped during call-backs. Air-quotes, fake laughter, and all. Everybody that interviews you has some power - don't assume it's meaningless just because it should be.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 09:16 AM
1

It's common practice for reddit mods on other subs to ban anyone who has posted to TRP, no matter what they've posted. It's a collective effort to silence people they don't agree with, rather than argue against them.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 12:02 AM
9

And opponents of the Iraq invasion were silenced by threats of being terrorist sympathizers by "conservatives". It's not just for feminists, it's typical for any movement pushing propaganda.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 10:35 AM
12

If you can't argue someone on the merits, silence them.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 09:52 AM
6

Won't find many STEM holding baristas. Well you would, but that would be because any moron can get a degree,
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 01:25 PM
4

Any fucking monkey can get a degree. If you show up to class and do your homework, you can get a degree. Bullshit. The vast majority couldn't get a degree in Engineering or a hard science from a real school if their lives depended on it. Go put some differential equations in front of an average cheerleader, and let us know how she makes out. Degree-mill nonsense like creative writing and feminist studies is one thing, but "just showing up" doesn't work in Thermodynamics.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 09:27 AM
23

Exactly, they aren't "obeying" him so much as just humoring him, waiting for the punchline or the street-magician trick. This is 10 seconds of "WTF...?", not a demonstration of authority. The orgasmic flailing on this thread about how "wow, he's so alpha as fuck, man!" are ridiculous and raise some doubt as to the mindset and maturity level of some people here.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/14 09:48 PM
5

Definitely sounds fake, and written by a man.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 08:41 PM
13

“The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else.” ― George Bernard Shaw,
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 09:51 AM
1

You're way overthinking it. Logic has no place when it comes to female emotions, and using logic is actively disapproved and viewed as an attack. She wants attention. She didn't get attention. So the guy's at fault. The rest is just bullshit filler. As for the others, if they are "friends" of the princess, to openly challenge her claims to attention will cause immediate vicious hatred. The men either don't give a shit and taking the path of least resistance, or are complying to bargain for sex.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 09:48 AM
1

It wasn't my charm, good-nature, or game that opened her. It was the way my muscles made my shirt bulge and stretch with each step I took. That was the second thing her eyes locked onto when she saw me. The first was my face. And if a 110-pound billionaire pulled up in a Ferrari, she'd turn her back on you in an instant. All else equal, a more fit physique is preferred, obviously - but it doesn't trump power and social status.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 09:28 AM
2

Again, he's saying that whereas men have historically utilized and developed physical strength, women have utilized and developed psychological tactics. What men have been given in physical strength, women have been given in their power of dissimulation. That does not imply that such a power is "magic". That does not imply that men may not dissumulate. It only suggests that the power of dissimulation is stronger in women, and physical strength is stronger in men.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/14 02:37 PM
1

Your argument would be stronger if you state exactly which part is "jaw dropping", and why. Just stating "it's bad so prohibit it!", without even attempting to illustrate why or to contradict it, is precisely what the tumblr-r/relationship hysterics do, and why their opinions are irrelevant.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/14 10:32 PM
3

There was no "magic power" claimed, and he did not say that it was limited to females - you are inventing claims to further your argument. That's a bit unseemly for an "intellectual", isn't it? The central claim is that, lacking physical strength, women have had to rely on psychological tactics to attack and defend to a greater degree than men have. That seems self-evident, and it's hard to see what needs "defending". His point on perjury is much shakier, and should have been worded as an opinio…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/14 10:22 PM
4

Yeah, not exactly RP, More like weeping teenage girl. Come on, man. She bangs some guy and your response is to start whining about how you're "sad" and you have "feelings for her", then you actually try arguing logic and "how would you feel"? Absent some kind of very unusual situation, no woman sleeps alone in a man's hotel room without the intention of banging the guy. Being "drunk" is absurd, and even if true only makes her less trustworthy. There is nothing to be done here - even if you get t…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/14 10:06 PM
4

Coming to the realization that a long-held, basic belief is completely false can be a traumatic experience. Like all traumas, people process them in stages. Similar to the stages of grief, when confronted with the reality that what they've been taught their whole lives, fundamentals that they've based their belief systems on, are completely wrong, men will commonly go through some form of denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and then finally acceptance. The intensity and duration of each stage…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/14 08:46 AM
2

Survival and propagation of the species are the prime directives. We are all slaves to those instincts, they are fundamental to humanity. We wouldn't have survived as a species without them. But, for whatever reason, we've decided to form agreements which require resisting basic instincts, and then set up value systems where we base our worth and happiness on obeying those agreements. It's unrealistic and a recipe for disaster, but it's also universal - for some reason we all do it.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 09:27 AM
2

It's a game, it's bullshit, realize it for what it is and realize that because it is so ingrained and widespread you're not going to change it, but don't let it change or define who you are. Yes, it's bullshit - but it's fantasy to think it doesn't define who we are. This thread would make no sense if it didn't define us. That you chose to frame your argument by stating your race illustrates it. But "define" doesn't mean "limit" - you can be an awesome, powerful, successful black guy, but you'll…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 09:52 AM
2

I don't even bother arguing with them over trivial annoyances like this anymore because they simply ignore logic and escalate the argument into nonsensical things while simultaneously raising their voices and bitchiness tone. Don't argue, don't even pay it any mind. You have better things to do with your time than supply their need for attention and power. Laugh and ignore them. Or better, just ignore them.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 09:11 AM
5

She's "sickening" because you expect her to be different, you're holding her up to artificial standards. When you realize that they're all the same, because they're all driven by the same instincts, you can redirect your anger into how to best manuver the situation rather than rejecting it. Women are not men, no matter how often it is claimed.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 09:03 AM
3

It's not idiotic from her point of view - she is saying she is going to whore herself out until she reaches an age when she will be willing to settle for a stable provider in exchange for money. The idiocy is in the guy feeling bad for even a second that he's losing her.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 08:55 AM
3

You severely overestimate most people. Most people are paycheck-to-paycheck, in debt and blowing everything they make on Chinese plastic trinkets and nonsense. They couldn't accumulate that much in 10 lifetimes.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 01:36 PM
1

Hate these fucking novelty bot comments.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 10:12 AM
1

Why?
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 10:03 AM
10

She's laying the groundwork for dumping the husband for the "friend".
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 11:28 PM
1

That may be, but it doesn't follow that he is at fault for her deception.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 09:38 AM
2

The crime here is not in her being compelled by instinct to bang another guy - the crime is in her deception and betrayal of trust of her husband. Instinct makes her want to be with the alpha, it doesn't force her to lie.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 09:02 AM
1

Too old, too long.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 07:43 PM
5

another girl does say something flirty with me, it turns my partner on (I swear to god I never believed anyone here about that shit until it happened to me... Absolutely insane how that stuff works). It's an instinctual response to competition. Women attract and maintain the attention of men through sexuality. When threatened with the loss of their protector/provider, an obvious response is to increase sex to increase the attraction.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 08:55 AM
4

The whole idea of men and women spending leisure time together is misguided. If there were no sexual or family motives, the interests and activities of most men would not include women at all. The sexes like different things, for different reasons - the expectation that couples are supposed to spend leisure time together is artificial and a recipe for frustration.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 09:26 AM
47

they don't see what was wrong with this attitude they had. He's a guy with money willing to give it to them. If he keeps giving, take it. If he stops, find another host to latch onto. Right and wrong don't enter their minds, getting their hands on the money is the point. If you know any hard drug addicts you'll recognize the pattern. The real lesson here is: never get involved with a woman with children. She'll always be thinking of providing for the children first (which is logical), you'll nev…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 10:05 PM
6

You ableistprivilege piece of shit, you deserve to have your eyeballs gouged. You have no respect for all the trans-able persyns who don't live up to your privileged shaming skills. Cisjustice is a social construct, you don't have exclusive rights to use it as a weapon to shame-rape those in the bi-pan-trans-justice community. Also, claiming that you are a supremacist because you took classes is the height of degree-rape, shaming and belittling the sub-university community. Your violent depictio…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 11:11 PM
2

I've lost track of what you're arguing. First, you have a unicorn who won't screw you and trade up. Then, she will trade up if the payout is big enough. Now, it's not really screwing you because you deserve it, and everybody has warped views. Finally, some random stuff about beta orbiting and realism in fairy tales that has nothing to do with the above.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 09:25 PM
1

who in their right mind in that situation would stick around? I agree - it's unreasonable to expect her to. But you're the one that claimed she was a unicorn who would not screw you over and trade up. Now you say "of course she would trade up, if the trade up value were high enough!". Which is it? If it's the latter, then it just becomes a question of how much value does she need to prompt her to trade up, and she's the same as any other woman - the only difference being her (claimed) requiremen…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 07:01 PM
2

on the viewpoint that a unicorn is someone that will not fuck you over, cheat if a more alpha guy comes along, hypergamy and all the rest then yes she is a unicorn in that respect. Assume that you lost your job, gained 100lbs., and took up a drug addiction. Then assume that a multi-billionaire came into her life bearing lear jets and globetrotting vacations with celebrities in 5-star hotels and a guaranteed lifetime of luxury. Would you bet your life that she would never trade up under those cir…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 02:45 PM
7

Report back after the marriage and/or birth, and let us know how it's going.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 02:01 PM
19

There used to be unicorns until feminism came and shot them all. Feminism didn't erase the instincts built into them over millions of years - it just gave them a license to pretend to be something they're not. It let them scream at the world that they hate children, or cover themselves in tattoos and work in male-oriented fields, but it didn't change who they are. The same things that made them happy before still make them happy, despite the rhetoric. A man who can provide those things will alwa…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 01:58 PM
3

You must really suck at relationships to be in this position, There's a lifetime of history that landed him in this spot: pop media and school indoctrination, instinctual pressure to care for family, insecurities, parental issues, how role models formed his perspectives when young, maybe affection or attachment issues like you said, etc., etc. But we're all human, we all have areas that need improvement, and it's good to see that King Beta has woken up to his situation and has a desire to change…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 07:10 PM
28

You're 34. You might believe that's pretty old, but you have probably another 10 years until you're really past your prime. More like 25, maybe more if he stays fit and keeps building his wealth and network. Youth is not a selection criterion for women - power, wealth, and status are. King Beta sounds like he has a handle on developing those, at least outside his home. There isn't a woman on reddit of any age that wouldn't put out for George Clooney if they really believed they had a shot at sna…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 06:55 PM
2

A large portion of posters here seem to be frustrated immature types going through their existentialist nihilism phases, adopting a seige defense mentality against manufactured enemies as a means of defending against their confusion.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 09:07 PM
0

Yes, the world would be a more enjoyable place if there were no people around to enjoy it.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 10:34 AM
4

Lesson: don't put faith in a woman that has more outs than you do.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 09:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter