TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ninja_Arena Archive

View 1 post and 503 comments by Ninja_Arena on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Ninja_Arena/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:48 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's possible but also.possible a lot of people have been slowly brainwashed and people have a tendency to gravitate towards excuses to hate people different from them.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 06:12 PM
4

Yeah...it's because the reasoning is fueled by hate of a system and.possi Ly of men (possibly the white cos male archetype in their heads) and not by reality. Women across most other groups are doing better than their male counterparts, including out earning when both are childless.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 03:05 PM
7

Just don't ignore warning signs like super narcissistic behaviour or gaslighting attempts and it's unlikely you'll have issues...and of course respect in the bedroom. When they slightly suggest having an issue with something sexually it's possible they have been thinking about it for a bit of its a regular thing. Communication
/r/MensRights01/04/23 05:44 AM
1

Yup but I'm sure it partly gained ground because people....not totally into the movement, wanted to use it as an example of why the movement sucks. It's was an overdue movement but man did it overcorrect.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:39 AM
9

Yup. It's listen to but don't believe unless proven. I still think there's room in the bullshit and non bullshit accusations and the movement overall was a long time coming but for fuck sakes "believe all women" sounds like a phrase you'd come up with if you wanted to DISCREDIT the metoo movement as opposed to help it.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 04:56 AM
9

He didn't call it out as much as he was just doing a thought experiment relating to the interviewers type of questions. I get ops point but think he's going a little too hard in the "women are always being sexy for advantage at work" angle. It happens but generally not to the degree he implies. I've never really seen a woman (coworker) overtly try to use her sexuality to get something at work unless she was directly hitting on me or another coworker. I'm not saying it doesn't happen but think it…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 09:23 PM
0

Cleaning toilets for a living to a degree is degrading. Everyone should get respect for earning their keep through life and anyone working should be respected by toilet cleaning is not something most people aspire to do and anyone who's ever cleaned a disaster toilet knows that it does feel.like that.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 05:27 AM
1

I said that's the arguable part but the actual product can still be degrading regardless of men want it to be.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 07:55 AM
1

A lot of it is. Come on now. I'm not saying there aren't or won't always be women who choose that path for some quick money, no matter how equal our societies are, but come on guys....... Yes the idea about wanting to degrade women...sure....but people also don't want to degrade animals but we ignore that to get things we want.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 11:42 PM
2

Id argue more.often then not it's not a.gender issue, just something that happens cause one person has a dominant and toxic personality and the other is passive.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 04:57 AM
36

Privilege and entitlement. A life without consequences. I don't know the context but it seems like she decided to make a mess of things from the start.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/22 03:46 AM
11

Wtf was wrong with her. Why did she onsite on taking the chair in the first place? What happened before that?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/22 03:44 AM
2

Likely not a woman.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:51 AM
7

I don't say this often but what a piece of shit for writing that article. At best she's gaslighting the victims...."sure it's bad but at least it's not a dude" and the reality is she's a bigot that sees men as only what they envision in their social circles. Fuck that person. Making the world a worst place one article at a time.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:36 PM
4

Be ok with your husband getting strange then.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 12:49 PM
1

Her doing what she had to do....if people are giving that angle, the men were still victims and.should be able to sure for millions
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/22 03:50 AM
2

Probably hold 2.thords of university student spots as well.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 01:27 PM
17

I don't really care about this as far as "mens rights" issues go EXCEPT so many regions have laws where men have to raise/provide for kids that aren't theirs, which is fucked up.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 06:17 PM
2

Shit feminists. Shit feminism is what shit feminists do.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 12:03 PM
1

Well they said it tested bad......but that could be a cover for some toxic set conditions or something.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 04:37 PM
10

I don't see this as a mens rights issue. Yeah it's a cultural issue but not an"right" that's being infringed upon. Don't make mens rights advocates into homogeneously cultured group that doesn't allow variety of opinion of experience like so many did with feminism. This isn't a "waking up" situation.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 04:32 PM
2

As long as they do the same basic job as well. Of you can't tough pork, we can't hire you (or can't be expected to for diversity) as a butcher at a place that sells a lot of pork. If you can't carry 50 pounds on a regular basis, you can't be a labourer at a construction site
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:14 PM
4

Who you calling short you bigot!
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:11 PM
14

My response was "fuck off". It's amazing that a bunch of people have gone full circle from "racism and sexism, assigning people to groups and judging those individuals based on traits of a group, people not from those groups assign, IS BAD" To "Yolo fuck everyone not like me and they are all evil and all a problem leeeets gooo racism and sexism!"
/r/MensRights05/06/22 04:00 PM
1

So I hope everyone's take now is correct, I have the same general views, but once the acceptance is there, leave her be. I think she's a toxic gaslighting liar but just don't spend anymore time on her basically as soon as.johnny gets another mainstream role. Just move on.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 04:58 PM
1

Geezus...tonnes of podcasts featuring women talk about doing this stuff all the time......extremely high expectations for their relationships
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:23 PM
2

I think it was dropped because the claim of racism was nonsense or the people.invivled were mentally unwell
/r/MensRights11/05/22 09:40 PM
1

I am shocked...shocked i tell you, that this is a black woman.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 12:05 PM
2

They don't want to. They don't care about the truth but about power. A case of a man being assaulted in a relationship or at least not being the prime offender of the abuse take power away from their narratives and a cancel tool. Makes it harder for them to cancel someone by labeling them. See racist, sexist and transphobe as well. All legitimate things people are but any person getting that label and it being proven not true or worse, the opposite means they can't label someone that in the futu…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 11:51 PM
1

"non conforming" eh...it's most guys. Again...they expect men to be perfect and not have flaws. If she was held to the same microscope and expected to not have any toxic sides of her, she would not pass. First evidence is the graphic. Condemning a whole group based on her ideals with no thought for the individual
/r/MensRights25/04/22 04:01 PM
1

It still works just the punishment is hearing a bunch of dudes say "niiice" when they hear about it.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 05:49 AM
1

Lol and don't tell me there won't be a bunch of lesbians being predators there that night.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:42 PM
2

Just like there is no standard or test to vote other than being able to show up, there is no standard (ethical or intellectual) to being a mod or start a subreddit or control a social media platform. In fact, similar to politicians and police officers, very often the people attracted to the job are the last people you'd want doing those jobs.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 04:27 PM
2

Agreed. I think it's a great day/idea but when it turns into men bashing....well that just puts us back to nonsense tribal behaviour and enabling bigots.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 12:05 AM
0

Yeah...international...women in a lot of countries don't have equal rights and accomplishments have been kinda ignored so it makes sense. No issue unless it turns into men bashing...which it very much sometimes does.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 12:04 AM
3

Everyone is shocked she has an overcomplicate label to describe herself and that label is focused on her having more freedom by way of demonizing others based on their labels she likely also applies to them.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/22 05:56 PM
2

I'd agree with that. This knits more about reaction. Having a very obvious emotional reaction instead of offering solutions, doesn't mean you're more empathetic, just means you focus on different things. Infact, I think wanting to solve the problem first is more empathetic but also sometimes people just want other to listen. So who knows
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:58 PM
1

Fucking assholes.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 05:22 PM
2

In western countries in the year 2021, yes.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:00 AM
9

Well said. Yes, everyone can be selfish and go on journeys to be free but nobody is owed that and her leaving is still what she wants to do. Best let her go and make sure the kids and ops mental and physical health are a priority in action and thought, not how selfish the wife might be in this case.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:57 PM
-10

It won't be but it's her choice, however selfish it may or may not be. No woman OR man has to stay with a partner or keep a family together. Shes not "breaking up the family" by choosing to leave. If she wants to leave then it's already a family of different dynamics then you see it. Trying to guilt a partner with that line of logic is toxic. Maybe she's slightly brainwashed by online nonsense but she's also like seeking out things she wants to hear. Leaving the kids is a different issue but has…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:55 PM
2

I think the downvotes are from people who didn't read all of what I said.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 05:03 AM
7

As a group, in general, men don't have it worse. Neither do women. Poor people, disabled people, people living in authoritarian countries, have it worse. Some people wanting to focus on issues that directly affect men shouldnt threaten this person...but it does.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:51 PM
11

So netball is essentially pronounced "nipple" with an Australian accent? We all have nipples pretty much...so equality?
/r/MensRights15/11/21 12:44 AM
17

It's such a weird fucking mindset.....scratch that.....it pathologicaly bigoted.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 07:42 PM
22

And assuming it's a plan that "ends world hunger", as was the claim made by the original tweet to at him.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 09:31 PM
-4

Women are funny. Get over it.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 05:35 AM
2

Also...what if someone on one of those dorms dates a "cis gendered" male? Were those workers even cis? Did those people complaining just judge them on their outwards appearance?
/r/MensRights18/10/21 10:32 AM
9

So that is clearly bigotry. I don't know how you can say it's anything else. You don't feel safe because it's someone who has a gender and skin color you don't like. You're a fucking racist and sexist.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 08:42 PM
8

Voluntary is an oversimplification as there are many factors for the choices people make. Also doesn't mean it isn't If OP is asking that a woman, with middle-class connected wealth, education, skills and opportunity to have a decent career, no drug addiction, isn't human trafficked, chooses to do porn, how is it degrading? Then yeah, there's something of a discussion to be had. The circumstances that could lead to less of a choice matter. The nature of the porn does matter. It's not a simple ye…
/r/MensRights12/10/21 09:30 PM
-5

If you're simply saying, when they are discussing a mostly female issue "us too" then I can see the annoyance if the solutions are useful to be female focused. If it's like those ads for homelessness that say something like "did you know 25 percent of homeless are women? Please think of the women!", Then yeah, let's get this conversation started and work on solutions that fix homelessness and programs that help to get people off the streets and working or whatever.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 02:51 PM
2

Yeah, that's almost always the case. That's why I hate labels and the type of generalization that's used to condemn or win an argument. Labels, from skin colour designation or sexual orientation or political party allegence are always dehumanizing and assumed and often wrong and have no bearing on the discussion. People, in whatever group you perceive them to be in, are not a monolith of thought or actions or tendency. It's bullshit and used by people trying to thought police and control narrati…
/r/MensRights24/09/21 03:54 PM
5

There's likely not as much crossover as you are assuming.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 12:07 PM
2

Well should find out. Start looking at mental health and psychiatry in general, not men specific help. Go to a medical doctor and see if they can refer you to a mental health doctor.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 05:50 PM
1

Depends on what country you are in and who you went to. Canada, you literally just need to go to a walk-in clinic and they'll help you out and direct you to someone. Also the mental health arm of healthcare. Nobody talking to someone doesn't mean there are no resources.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 05:38 PM
1

People care it's just significantly less. Loss of people dedicate their lives to helping men and women with me talk issues. Just is virtue signalled as much.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:58 PM
9

I'm totally willing to listen and believe it as well. Whether there is enough evidence for criminal or civil or social justice or it's actually true, is another issue entirely.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:16 PM
3

Don't think of it as pro-male. Think of it as anti-anti-male.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:46 PM
1

I'd say it's most often unwanted vs random. It almost always happen due to some sort of stimulus so saying it's random suggests nothing is causing it. It is more it's not consciously wanted very often. The right breeze, tight pants, being asleep, having to take a piss and it being extra sensitive.....goes on and on...
/r/MensRights30/07/21 02:18 AM
1

I know, meant to call a gf or wife that is kinda well, whatever, doesn't matter. Yeah...people cheat. Most relationships aren't perfect, I just would want to avoid the whole raising a kid that isn't yours thing. Cheating I/people can get over. Being lied to about paternity is soul crushing for a guy.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 07:54 PM
1

Yeah...not a horrible tactic bit would rather just be honest from the get go. Could stop one from trying that shit in the first place. Also, minus the "honey" part. I'm not ash from evil dead.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 07:30 PM
2

"Please don't be negative about me being a horrible, immature person and give me advice on how to continue to be more horrible". Dude probably got snipped. Also, if she thinks she has a right to just have a provider be commited to her for life, essentially a slave to her desires to have kids, does he has a right to just have a younger wife with no other responsibilities? Who knows what old world gender role society they live in but geezus this is scary. I highly recommend any guy starting off wi…
/r/MensRights02/07/21 12:45 PM
2

Get some sleep. I barely understand what I read or write on full rest so no worries.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 03:32 AM
8

I think it's still about the trans women wanting to voice their opinions on women's rights mostly and not about just flat out excluding them from whatever dance. It's hard not to agree with that at least a little as the trans woman's experience isnt generally discrimination or trials due to being a woman but due to being trans. It's not an easy life but when the basis is a psychological disorder or reality is maybe a better word, and the focus is on changing the outside instead of acceptance of …
/r/MensRights16/06/21 01:05 PM
1

Yeah,good link...there's my point. Adding news laws it's generally not a good idea. It's a flat out horrible idea if rule of law is ignored.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 04:40 PM
15

I'm not. At the same.time don't negate China's actions because a bunch of other people pull shit too. They are the growing leader so they should be focused on, just like the u.s. and Russia were for half a century.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 08:41 AM
12

Something tells me it won't be applied in a fair way but that's my own prejudice about African countries and treatment of women when it comes to sex. It's the right idea but fear it will be used to get a bunch of politicians off of tape charges.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:44 AM
20

China will fuck over anyone then can. It's a long term plan. They just aren't using direct military leverage for it.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:42 AM
3

Pretty brutal....when conversation is the enemy, you are dealing with a bunch of fascists and auth gov assholes.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 08:45 PM
1

Yeah and isn't the pay gap number for people aged 20 to 45 like hugely in favour of women?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 09:19 AM
1

Think a lot of these are just randos. Maybe girls, maybe dudes, but not the girl in the profile pic.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/21 07:52 AM
1

I'm more interested in how it was concluded that they were false accusations. Did she slip up or admit it out of guilt or her story just didn't add up with other evidence?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/21 08:38 AM
5

Think a lot of rapists get similar sentences so it seems fitting. But yeah, possible she serves little time.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/21 08:36 AM
1

It's.soemthong worth speaking about but if they were true to what they are claiming, 99 percent of their energy would be put towards countries where there is a much more serious form of that rape culture they are talking about. Refuse to buy items or use oil from those countries instead of posting fire tweets about how they low key hate a whole gender and any discourse of a subject that isn't pandering to their view.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 08:08 AM
-1

Feminists are not a monolith. Neither are men or men's rights activists. "Yeah not"?
/r/MensRights08/12/20 09:53 PM
0

Overall it's best not to generalize. It's not just a double standard but another example of generalizing. Something everyone should be trying to avoid. Skin colours and genders don't define people. The sooner we stop attaching weight to those ideas the better. Some stereotypes might think this way but a lot of women don't. It's pretty easy to have a conversation with these people and point out the nonsense quicky by asking a few questions and holding them accountable to their paths of logic. I w…
/r/MensRights08/12/20 06:50 PM
1

Don't think any parent should let their kids watch it personally. If they just had a toxic relationship, I could see it but she lied to ruin his career and was possibly the primary abuser or instigator. Edit: also, this can't be real.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 06:49 PM
1

It would make me feel better about the whole situation. If he wasn't 100 percent sure she was a piece of crap, he's sure now. Helps she admitted she cheated etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/20 06:05 AM
1

You can't control what everyone says on subs or even what gets upvoted without heavy modding. I think, while this sub for the most part seems to heavily critical of feminism, it's certainly not over into directly hating women.. good days and bad ones but seems to focus on men's issues.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 06:47 AM
1

She may have gotten away with it longer due to her gender or perceived idpol group as this crap is kinda old school shit that isn't tolerated as much anymore.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/20 01:36 PM
4

Yeah...Steve Harvey who spoke out against being gay on CNN got a pass from her as it's all about the biz.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/20 01:34 PM
2

Also the way our hips and legs are angled. It's more comfortable for us to sit like that.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 04:45 AM
2

She wants the support part just in case he makes more money. It's disgusting.. she wants to own him for life. Alimony is likely the best way to make the whole proceedings take longer so the lawyers get more money.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:15 PM
3

Women's subs in general? Or just hate subs with women participating?
/r/MensRights29/06/20 08:53 PM
7

Not really. The only thing he was really right about was how to control a country using fear and hate.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 04:47 PM
9

Wouldn't work at all. Just like the right, it's a deal* breaker issue so while they MIGHT get some pro lifers, they will lose all pro choicers
/r/MensRights24/06/20 04:43 PM
42

Especially those women. They all look under 100 pounds. I can't imagine them being able to physically do anything. I know women bigger then that who can't even do a pushup. I'm still a firm believer of appropriate response for the situation. Don't think he needed to slam her like that. She came at him way to close and then cries about his hand going up to push her away....then escalation. A simple headlock works.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/20 04:41 PM
1

It's pretty pathetic. Why even have a poll?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 11:43 AM
2

Well you can in the sense that you can train to people actually think about what is being said vs the Nixon/Kennedy radio/tv debate issue. But yes, it's an uphill battle at best. Their is a reason why tall and physically attractive people do better in business. Edit: fyi, thanks for the thoughtful reply. Edit 2: also the reason why understanding that physically attractive people having mental issue can be hard for us to process. See Amber Heard.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 11:00 AM
10

Sure that's possible but also irrelevant in the sense that you aren't going to convince them or other people by insulting their weight or looks. Also, as others have pointed out, the same tactic can be used to paint a picture of mras as lonely incels neckbeards or whatever to dissuade others from listening to what they say. It's bullshit and a trashy move at any rate. It's also just the common tactic used by everyone to get people to ignore any discourse from another side in debates. White male,…
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:48 PM
2

I'd maybe give up. The dude is just doubling down because he doesn't want to admit he's wrong to throw out stupid insults like that. Hitting first with something like ugly doesn't pursuade anyone or win arguments. It's fucking stupid. All it does is show how classless you are.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:23 PM
1

Yes. Also it's a stupid thing to assume and not provable and useless in the discussion and just fucking trashy. I sometimes think the people who always bring up physical traits in their insults are actually plants trying to discredit MRA. It's happened before.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:21 PM
29

Yeah, the whole physical description (assumption or not) of people who bash the general MRA movement doesn't help. What somebody looks like has nothing to do with whether or not theirs or our point of view is correct. If you cannot disagree or point out bullshit without referencing someone's looks then you are kinda proving some of the stereotypes they have about mras. It's cringey at best and hurting the MRA movement and setting it back at worst. Just stop. Nobody cares if you think Amy Schumer…
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:19 PM
2

Yup
/r/MensRights17/04/20 03:56 AM
2

Well a chasity belt for women would be the same without the need for surgery.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 03:05 AM
2

I think we have to lean towards the shocking reality that crimes have to be investigated and prosecution shouldn't occur via twitter using social influence...cause then we aren't Ina democracy anymore. It sucks because there are many crimes you can't prove but, geezus, let the investigations go through!. It's honestly at the point that I'm wondering if in addition to black people needing to wear cameras with microphones to prove things (police or acts if racism), that everyone else should do the…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 03:43 PM
1

Well it is a legal sub I thought. It's not a place for sympathy, just the law.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 10:54 AM
1

Yeah, that would be the only downside of this. Other wise it's not horrible if the market supports it. The real trouble starts with wether you allow transgender to declare themselves female when operating as a driver
/r/MensRights20/02/20 06:00 PM
1

Huge one. He seems to have a type as grimes is interesting. Imagine her fucking up Tesla because of that crap.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 10:28 PM
1

It's a fine balance. No moderation and everything is bombarded by bots either for marketing purposes or for trolling/political campaigns. Some or heavy moderation and you centralize the control of the narrative for everything. I'm a fan of the two sites idea that gets floated around when talking about twitter. You turn on or off the filter and it essentially creates two sites. You can enter wild west Reddit where anything goes short of direct and specific vile criminal acts. You can and will be …
/r/MensRights02/02/20 08:22 PM
2

I agree. It always seemed off. Just be careful here to not do to the situation that was done before. Doesn't mean Depp is 100 percent innocent. I always thought the abuse stuff was just two volatile actors who discuss things by getting drunk on some wine and tossing glasses or whatever and it was bullshit that she was default the victim and he was default the abuser. I skewed towards Depp based on testimonies bit really we didn't know Now it seems like it was heavily her. Depp's former girlfrien…
/r/MensRights02/02/20 08:05 PM
2

It's just another word people choose, then demonize, then decide only they can define it, then use it as a slur anytime you disagree with them. Fun times
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:33 AM
2

They hate men. I hear people say "so and also hates women" for things that aren't related...like wanting equal for equal work pay but also wanting to not shove identity quotas down peoples throats or wanting due process to occur with rape accusations. But this level of hypocrisy is actually due to people hating men, if the people involved in the articles have any overlap that is. Edit: also, don't look up nude leaks of celebrities. Kim Kardashian....ok....that was a "leak". Jennifer Lawrence and…
/r/MensRights01/02/20 09:14 PM
8

Don't give those asshats money. Petition to stop advertiser's giving them money based on their clicks. Petition to redo how people/advertisers approach valuing a website or page.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 09:10 PM
6

Or "enlightened centrist"
/r/MensRights01/02/20 09:09 PM
20

Reddit is at least a group of different people with different interests. Post are done on a per person basis and whole front page and other things are manipulated, it's a bunch of different people with different agendas. BuzzFeed I know can have different editors with different points of view but over the narrative can be controlled by higher ups fairly easily. BuzzFeed is the "news" paper. Reddit is a convenience store with a bunch of magazines and newspapers that might include things like Buzz…
/r/MensRights01/02/20 09:08 PM
1

But it stops at a person being am adult. Teacher loses job, end of story unless grooming can be proved or something
/r/MensRights17/01/20 02:38 AM
6

Women 100 percent get judged more for body weight. Men 100 percent get flat out ignored more.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 07:58 PM
-8

No but have a reason why it's ok which is fine but isn't the same for everyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/19 11:26 PM
-11

Well it depends on the person which is what Ice pointed out. You are kinda doing the same as her. Some may like.it and some may not. Permission is a common part of it though
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/19 10:41 PM
1

The best part really.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/19 10:40 PM
12

Also feel like 90 percent of people in a consensual committed relationships do some form of this and it's not creepy. Basically a "wake up, I'm horny" universal message for couples. Usually it's in the form of grinding but have had that exact situation happen many times. Seems like a reach for a double standard. Are there women on the internet who would claim it's super rape and a guy doing something similar needs to be cancelled and castrated...sure, but don't think that's the norm.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 03:30 PM
3

She was doing her actual job. Interviewing. There has been a lot of interviews with him where they did just that. Even ones when he thought they were disagreeing bit were actually just suggesting a thoughtful counterargument for the purpose of the discussion
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 05:52 AM
8

And those are people who just saw Peterson crying and saw her hate and liked.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 03:49 PM
1

A lot don't. Let's not spread false information to fit a narrative. It would be better if more went immediately so bullshit claims were easier to address.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/19 02:40 AM
3

My posts are too rant inspired to be readable sometimes. No worries.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 12:50 AM
17

Annmd the all important, legitimate victims are now going to face a harder battle as a result. The big 3: Depp's case, Aziz's date and Chris Hardwick breakup fallout. Each case had different examples as to how this shit goes bad and only came to light because of significant evidence to defend them when the accuser should require the evidence for guilt. Depp's situation, at worst, was two emotional actors who shouldn't have been together and might have gotten into scraps with each other. Evidence…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 12:27 AM
6

You can be civil and still seem indifferent to someone's existence. I think that is the make to aim for if you are this person. It is true and it's an unfortunate part of being male, trying to determine if a woman is being polite or generally interested since we are often the initiators.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 04:19 PM
2

When the police arrived, he could have just exited peacefully. Also tell the police he was worried for his safety around girlfriend...also her and him both sound like idiots. Got for a walk. Leave her in the apartment...something. Ofcourse the reverse situation would result in the guy still getting arrested so this is a men's rights issue, just that the people involved are dumbasses
/r/MensRights21/07/19 05:55 PM
1

Well I hear people say better pay a lot.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 07:25 AM
1

Think I've already said multiple times they shouldn't get paid the same as men, at least not with the earnings the way they are now. Who knows, in 20 years, if might be close if female viewership goes way up due to more and more girls playing soccer.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 03:05 PM
1

That's...that's what they are doing ......you act like everyone is getting paid at max already. It's tough to use your leverage sometimes without risk .....welcome to business or negotiation or real life or whatever to make me cool like you. They are fighting for more. Again, is the program can bear it, maybe they should get more because they have the leverage right now
/r/MensRights09/07/19 06:16 AM
1

That's an extreme point of view but women in their 20s training for the word stage is time consuming and a time when they should be developing skills for their future. I'm not a huge fan of the rah rah for Olympic sports and people sacrifice for something that brings them glory and possibly money ultimately, but i think woman's soccer in the u.s., if 8t can afford it and they are getting a very low sum, looking at increasing it is reasonable. It's a different situation from the men's because the…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:48 PM
1

I answered that at other points. Saying if the program (women's) can afford to give them more, then maybe do it.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:44 PM
1

Talking about the women's program based on their ability to bring in revenue
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:43 PM
1

I always said, if the program can afford it.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:13 PM
1

That's a fair point.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:12 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:11 PM
3

It's fine if they make more than men.....if they brought in more. It's just like everything. People are capitalizing off of social causes. Pride parades are just big corporate fests now. I like kapernick kneeling, why not, but he then went on to make bank from Nike....who uses a lot of 3rd world manufacturing that maybe isn't super great for the people there. All coming from the Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton school of opportunistic social justice fuckbois
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:11 PM
0

Read my post again. I said if the program can afford it. Beyond that it's not reasonable
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:08 PM
0

That doesn't fall in at all logically. People have different reasons for joining the team. It's not entitlement, it proper appropriation of funds for the people who bring in the crowd, however small relatively it might be. Read my whole post. I'm not demanding they make male level money but if the program can afford it, pay them more
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:07 PM
-9

Yeah.. most don't. But the topic at hand, they deserve a reasonable amount. It shouldn't be same as men's but if possible, they should get paid more
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:25 PM
-15

That's fine but doesn't mean their pay can't change? You think nobody's pay has changed ever? It's reasonable to ask for their pay to adjust to make it worthwhile if the program can handle it. It's not reasonable to ask that they get paid the same as men who generate waaaay more money from playing just for fairzees cause, like you said, U.S. ain't communist Russia or whatever
/r/MensRights08/07/19 03:55 PM
-2

Yup. Give them a respectable wage or a respectable portion so it's worth their time. 44k isn't bad if the league doesnt really generate revenue but that's also the time those women could be learning other skills for post soccer life. If, for world Cup, their higher percentage still gives them jack shit, then pump the percentage up if the program can handle that. If it wouldn't allow the program to function and promote then it's kinda tough shit scenario. The women's side of the sport can grow so…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 03:49 PM
-7

I still think the women should get a respectable amount and not compare it to the overall number the men get. If they need to get 40 percent for it to be worth their time, then do that. They shouldnt have to sacrifice or postpone their careers or life to play women's soccer....if it generates enough to give then a decent chunk for the appearance. Blah blah blah pride of your country etc. But yeah, once again, the actual numbers aren't looked into, just a wave of cries for justice
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:33 PM
11

"I'm a bigot and want safe spaces where nobody acts bigoted towards me and my friends"
/r/MensRights05/07/19 02:01 PM
1

When I looked into it, it seemed crazy. Logically inconsistent and completely ignorant of how most the female population act and feel as well. Seems like a movement that requires an extreme lack of life experience and genuine social interaction in order to be convinced it makes sense. Basically, this is not the answer frustrated with life men and boys should be looking for. Really, there is no "the" answer. Doesn't mean marriage is a good idea but also doesn't mean you should go all in the other…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 05:59 AM
15

Geezus, the Reddit link was a cesspool....also kinda similar language to some of the stuff I see in men's rights though...
/r/MensRights12/06/19 06:32 AM
4

Well they both had girlfriends and more were just there for the social aspect but yeah, trash people get called out regardless. We all felt bad for the dudes who left. Like the one guy went right up to them and said they were leaving and she pretended like he wasn't there. Horrible.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:55 PM
12

Yeah, requires a lot to be charming and good looking to work. Also have to reciprocate and buy the next drink likely for it to work beyond you getting a free drink.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:38 PM
11

Called them out in a very blunt way for ditching the other guys once the drinks were paid for.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:36 PM
173

Eh, that's weird but not uncommon. In Toronto, had two women hanging out with two guys when a a couple of my friends and I arrived at bar we frequent. The two women were half talking to the group I came with. Right after the guys fucking paid the bills and said they were heading out, the women fucking ignored them completely. Didn't even look at them. Guys left and they focused more on us. We played some games, foosball etc. they hung out, acted obnoxious and insulting and tried to get us to buy…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 04:43 AM
3

I'm in the camp that I don't believe the first few waves were not peaceful but violent protests were super common back then. They were the norm for a lot of groups where rights were the issue. Everyone from unions to groups relating to wars or religion.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 07:23 PM
2

I'm so sick of that line of thought that's it's structural. That's just one way it fucking occurs. It's not the fucking definition of racism. It's an example of racism in society you numb nuts
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:09 AM
1

Yeah, it for sure is a thing. Ha g around an abortion place with any protesters and it will likely get shouted at some point. Just like this woman triggered by a sign and feeling justified in violence is bullshit
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/19 12:49 AM
8

Diversity in Hollywood means white woman, black people and a sprinkling of gay characters played by gay actors. Forget about Asians, southeast Asians, heavily native mexicans, middle Eastern, arab etc. And yeah, when the country shifts to 25 percent one group then the market will shift to that because that's who is buying the tickets. Edit:stuff
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:20 AM
9

That is awesome.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 07:30 PM
1

I disagree. Seen some decently convincing YouTube stuff on it but just think real solid evidence isn't there. Just a lot of stuff that helps but isn't definitive proof.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 04:00 AM
1

If Nic Cage loses this case, it's akin to saying: we've decided as a society that all women are whores and therefore they need to be paid for their companionship no matter what. It's a loss for not just men's rights but feminism by most definitions.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 01:54 AM
2

The cage one seems more clean cut. The Depp one is classic he said, she said with Depp having access to lots of files to say at minimum, her claims are questionable at best and flat out lies. Cage's case is a slam dunk. No Vegas wedding with immediate divorce or whatever should result in any money changing hands.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 01:50 AM
1

Some of that person's points are decent, others are not. But also, mra's can do both. Do a version focused on men and the inequality there but also on solutions not directly attacking the inequality relating to men
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:16 PM
1

Right. It's not about funding but is about awareness. Guys need to take it seriously. Awareness will breed more funding. Also get tested.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:48 PM
1

Was thinking of the kids....geezus dude.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 01:57 PM
156

Sad story.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 03:25 AM
2

I probably don't agree with a bunch of Biden's policies
/r/MensRights05/04/19 04:37 PM
-7

Do the forget the part where he acting like an asshat. It doesn't "expose" the hypocracies of the left when he legitimately acts like what identity politics people claim all men act like.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 03:07 PM
-5

Agreed. Trump is feeding an anti men movement, giving them legitimacy
/r/MensRights05/04/19 02:32 PM
-42

Id agree if this post wasn't part of a wave of anti Joe Biden movement started by trolls and trump supoorters. Biden seems off but waaay less then trump and Hillary clinton. Dunno...
/r/MensRights05/04/19 02:31 PM
20

There's a lot of talk about informal labour like housework which is, as someone on that thread pointed out, is moving the goalposts on the debate and is yet another effort to make women out to be helpless human beings that need to be saved by properly educated women who conveniently decide that there is still a gap or mass discrimination that effects nearly every woman.... It's weird cause most the people in office positions throughout my career are women and most people working hard labour jobs…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 02:41 PM
4

Since the word racism is hanging on by a thread, only slightly saved because they have shifted the complaints not to racists but to white supremacists so they can make sure the focus is on white males, I say we all start saying bigot instead of racist. Call her a fucking bigot, it's a harder word to pervert for power grabs
/r/MensRights31/03/19 10:19 PM
3

Well the idea is it's suppose to stop when things are "even". I've found people lose their minds when you ask what is even when they say there needs to be more diversity. They do not want to quantify because they know their reasoning is bullshit
/r/MensRights31/03/19 10:16 PM
2

Geezus..society is over if it does. Rule of law gone. We don't even have people treated equally with the law saying we should. Wtf is gonna happen if the law says we have to treat people unequally in yet another area
/r/MensRights31/03/19 10:14 PM
4

Yeah, don't know the angle he's going at
/r/MensRights24/03/19 04:11 PM
20

This sub is full of people concerned with equal rights for men and some are trying not to be hypocrites about it.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 04:09 PM
1

A significant portion are not unfortunately but a lot of people have said the same thing you have, that we need to wait for it to be investigated before brigading or pitch forking. It doesn't look good for amber at this point though
/r/MensRights23/03/19 06:01 PM
1

Yeah. Video was insanely well thought out. Love watching deep investigation when it comes up with great evidence contradicting previous statements and ideas about something. Only issue I have and it was kind of a big one, the dude settles on the one date related to the james corden appearance and there could have easily been other "late night" TV appearances, even local news spots. He kinda settled on that date and ran with it. Maybe Netflix should do a short mini series titled "making an abuser…
/r/MensRights23/03/19 05:59 PM
-1

I'm glad I'm seeing a lot of these posts in this sub. Be the change and treat others as we expect men to be treated. I believe she is guilty of most of what was accused of her but there is no rush. Let people getting paid to do it, comb through the evidence and release their findings
/r/MensRights23/03/19 04:23 PM
2

I think that's a fair stance. We am still voice opinions as information comes out but shouldn't be doing the same route of immediate pitchfork after accusation
/r/MensRights23/03/19 04:21 PM
3

Great way to put it. I'm still not a huge fan of massive brigading but we are trying to change perceptions on DV. We won't get what we want long term if we act like children and do the same things we say are bad for other groups to do, often to men. It's objectively stupid and hypocritical.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 04:20 PM
-2

Assuming you aren't trolling, simplest answer is : if a man is the one penetrating, as any man knows, they are often not in control of their erections. An erection ISN'T the a sign of consent. Outside of that, a man can obviously be forcibly penetrated himself and any man can be groped by anyone and everything in between EDIT: Big fucking edit on that contraction for is vs isn't. Sorry
/r/MensRights23/03/19 04:17 PM
0

Well I agree this sub can be rampant with hypocracy sometimes, the rage was over the fact that it was asking for a ban of Depp on just an accusation and a suspicious one at best. A lot of people warning lights went off on her accusation. Although I will say I'm more in the camp of they probably did some mutual assault but she still seems like the main perpetrator. As an add-on to that I will say that likely every single woman that is guilty of female on male DV is 100% the type of person to clai…
/r/MensRights23/03/19 02:02 PM
181

Wasn't the way she described it he was passed out?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:09 AM
7

Good for her but she still manages to make fun of and dismiss false rape accusations however rare they are...maybe as rare as female suicides relative to make suicides or female v male workplace deaths. Seems like it should all be under the same umbrella. All of these issues have the same theme of "ignored male suffering due to males being seen as disposable and their suffering inconsequential due to 1% of men that rule most of the world".
/r/MensRights19/03/19 02:02 PM
2

Ahhh, he has evidence with her stating all that? Well that seems like the bigger evidence. I heard tapes of her hitting him but fucking lead with the tapes of her saying he's never been violent....
/r/MensRights19/03/19 02:09 AM
-12

When did that happen?
/r/MensRights18/03/19 07:23 PM
-19

Well it's possible parts of what she was saying are true but it appears as though she is at least the more frequent abuser. Without evidence, I wouldn't necessarily believe any one person but Johnny produced evidence. I just want to keep the same energy with these kinds of cases. Ofcourse the thing that makes her an asshole is using the movement to play some helpless victim meanwhile, she's just as bad if not worse at minimum.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:34 PM
1

Yeah, blanket statements don't often work or aren't true. The whole industry is a mix and whether a woman did it for financial gain or not, it's still a problem for everyone that the industry is set up like that. Difference is you dont cast the same sentence for every male exec or female actor involved because the situations are all different.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 07:20 PM
5

Well said.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 07:08 PM
2

This tweet is in the same category as the Rush Limbaugh tweet on the incident and should be treated as such
/r/MensRights16/03/19 02:50 PM
2

Yeah I think many do
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:37 PM
26

Yeah. It's interesting how these movements progress as.people try to co-opt them or gatekeeper them for personal reasons
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:37 PM
1

Once in a while they still do good, going against the grain in favour of actual rights. Them posting that I think is the work of some intern or fresh out of college newbie
/r/MensRights15/03/19 08:26 PM
1

Exactly. Also, different women want different things
/r/MensRights15/03/19 08:23 PM
1

That's not her narrative though. And the bodies she points out take a lot of work and certainly are in a similar category...if any of this woman's posts are real
/r/MensRights15/03/19 08:12 PM
2

That's a good point. Why should we care what she thinks we want to look like. Edit: or better yet, why does she get an opinion on what men aspire to? Did she take men's studies courses in college or just women studies? I'm guessing just women's and that makes her uniquely unqualified to talk about that topic.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 08:07 PM
0

Yeah, some of the anti feminist stuff is on the exact same level as the post everyone is complaining about. I think we should discuss the double standards or hypocracies but also work to help ourselves. Can't turn a blind eye to it or become like them.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 08:05 PM
2

Yeah, until/unless/if there is some massive shift socially and biologically in courtship and chasing with the gas vs brake, hunter vs hunted relationship of men and women, I think there will be fantasies like this. But remember two things, these are fantasies, not what they want in day to day life and this is a sample size of women that tend to look at porn and were part of this study. It might skew in the same way that a sample size of cam models might
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:46 PM
2

Lots of men have unrealistic standards for what they want or expect out of women as well BUT I think there is more consistency with us knowing we look like trash and are out of shape when we are. As you pointed out and is the whole point of this post, the mind boggling part is that the standards are never applied to them because that's not allowed
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:40 PM
187

Yeah it sucks. Believe the victim means believe all women. That's how it started because obviously the victim is relative to who the criminal is which can't be determined unless you investigate buuuut the term refers to women. Still further pushing the narrative that women are constant victims There might be some people that will expand it to mean actual victims as opposed to believe any claims from women but I don't notice any in the media or when it comes to a case other then mra's. Some comed…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:37 PM
1

I'm not patting myself on the back and your road goes nowhere but breeds more hate from all sides. The we you talk of....need to actually be in positions to change things. Ignorantly and crudely talking about people you are against in the same way they speak about you on the internet....literally changes nothing. We are all likely keyboard warriors but it does nothing in the grand scheme other then produce more hate if you spout ignorant hate. You are giving them exactly what they want, an ignor…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:26 PM
1

Look at all the progress we are making
/r/MensRights15/03/19 11:45 AM
2

Kinda agree with that person. It's about a community where they can find support and people like them and pushing the idea that you don't demonize people for their sexuality or identity. I'm not a fan of identity politics but do like it when people don't feel shame for who they are. Doesn't mean I think that's all they should be about. "What kind of person are you?" "Oh I'm a quad gendered anomol Marxist feminist..." "Yeah but like what music do you listen to" Feminist didn't use to be a persona…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:30 PM
1

I understand what you are doing obviously. Just don't complain about them doing it.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:01 PM
-2

Tit for tat makes you no better then them or the ones you complain about...maybe even worse because you are "enlightened" where they might be products of massive brain washing. I get the frustration but going tit for tat makes it easier for men's right detractors to dismiss or slander the movement
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:36 PM
-8

I think the movement overall is important. Shitty people ability to use it doesn't make women calling out some bullshit a good thing. Long run might actually bring to light the bullshit men have to deal with violence wise
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:20 PM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:16 AM
2

Yup, that's the big spin on that. The privaledge is the 1 percent elite, not literally every other man out there who is not at all privaledge, never mind if you are a black male and the police are involved although black women have had similar issues to a lesser degree in the states. Over history, yes men had opportunity women did not. Economic and social advancement. They also had to take a lot of shit that was never asked of women at all. But in the end, assuming this story is true at this poi…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:32 AM
8

Or they don't ride a bike to work because they are at home? It's just weird all over and seems like a massive waste of time for her to study and post it.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 01:53 AM
1

She looked like her head might have bounced off the wall. That's where the stun might be from.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/19 01:01 AM
5

Someone should adjust the study for income gained from husband when the woman is a housewife and income from alimony
/r/MensRights10/03/19 01:24 PM
1

It's also a bunch of article title saying she feels that way. I'm likely not watching the movie at this point but the better info would be direct links to her saying all these things, not clickbait titles
/r/MensRights10/03/19 01:05 PM
1

Honestly, I believe the solution is to have wages public, at least within the company. It only helps the company and divides workers to have secrecy about wages. How many bosses use the old "don't tell anyone you are getting paid this *wink" , meanwhile probably 2 more people getting paid more than you
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:03 AM
1

They likely won't unfortunately......but really, don't know how you decide to pay people in high end tech industry the same. They have different skills and levels of ability. One programmer can request whatever the fuck he wants and another is making min
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:39 AM
0

Those two things are not connected.. man hating vs bad movie. Also, like I said or implied, no movies we can watch of we take pieces of shit being involved. You do you. Good luck.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:37 AM
1

By watching the movie. That's what's happening. Pandering to people as cheap marketing is being encouraged.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:14 AM
1

Disagree. People are encouraging pandering. Doubt I'll watch it as this point unless it's on tv.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:08 AM
1

Well, guess I won't see it then.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:41 PM
13

It is pretty brutal. Got told it was a good alternative to a mensrights when I was complaining about all the ignorant anti feminist (older school egalitarian based) in the mensrights sub where basically people were doing exactly what they claim to hate the feminists for. Generalizations, labels and hateful discussion. Went to men's lib and it's basically a hand holding discussion as to why men suck with the idea it's with the intent for them to be better. It's like a Jewish based sub not directl…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:32 AM
1

Watch it on Netflix and realize that in most films there is probably an asshat involved who will make money off you watching it so just watch it if you're a fan of marvel stuff
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:20 AM
2

Yeah..probably different everywhere
/r/MensRights06/03/19 01:05 AM
1

Yeah, think it's local.fore fighting vs forest fire emergency dudes
/r/MensRights06/03/19 01:04 AM
2

Agreed
/r/MensRights05/03/19 05:04 PM
325

It's similar to nobody complaining about men dominating garbage. People must think the fireman gig is kush or they wouldn't be complaining. When reality sets in that they will take anyone.....
/r/MensRights04/03/19 11:06 PM
33

Yeah...geezus, wtf was that about. Remember when trolls use to just be bored 12 year old kids and not psychopaths with internet access?
/r/MensRights28/02/19 09:06 PM
2

Yeah. I think as far as online dating goes, this is how it should be. In real life, I get making the first move but there's just so much time that can be wasted when you don't even know if who you are talking to is real or interested. This doesn't totally solve that but it helps
/r/MensRights27/02/19 03:49 AM
7

Yeah, saves time trying to charm a woman who's not really interested but just likes the attention. That can still happen but reduces that. Also reduces spam and bots a bit. I don't mind it but she may be responding to men complaining about the app. Trying to engage with multiple women who may be fake accounts or old accounts or just not interested. This saves a lot of time in that regard. Just let's me know a woman is interested.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 03:48 AM
-4

Never heard her say anything like that. Only thing I know about her is she was obsessed with the bachelor and invited him to a party and was too nervous to meet him.....as her scripted talk show segment told us anyway
/r/MensRights26/02/19 07:19 AM
7

That but also pretty much everyone is starting to get fed up with corporations co-opting social movements for dollars and idiot proofed* marketing angles.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 07:17 AM
1

If you think we can have a functional society when people don't have to prove accusations then you are an idiot and likely would be the first one complaining when people in power abuse that power and your rights based on your logic. Society literally crumbles if you get rid of requiring evidence and holding people accountable to false accusations. On support of victims with the possibility of false accusations in mind, just because an accusation wasn't planning doesn't mean it was a false accusa…
/r/MensRights22/02/19 06:32 PM
1

I disagree with your drug assesment. Different people are addicted for different reasons, different origin stories if you will and it is a mental health problem for a lot of people, nevermind the ones that started when young or had it forced upon them, which also happens.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 06:28 PM
1

It's not 99 percent. Ignore economically or educationally disadvantaged and it's still might not be 50 percent
/r/MensRights22/02/19 02:56 PM
1

Yeah....best solution is don't let government dictate what consenting adults do with their bodies bit that's just me....
/r/MensRights22/02/19 02:14 PM
1

Agree with most of what you say other than the 99 percent are willing prostitutes part. Willing is too general here and I think most are desperate and make the choice to be a prostitute which I think is fair to argue is not willing. You take what you can get. A significant portion of prostitutes are drug addicts. Another significant portion are economically stressed to put it lightly. I have often said that it is a choice for a significant portion of them but think 99 percent is ridiculous. I'd …
/r/MensRights22/02/19 02:12 PM
10

Yup yup yup. They have more concern for a female looking robot then a man's rights. The idea that they are concerned about how men will view women due to using these robots seems like a stretch. It will hurt the men themselves with that reasoning, not women.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 07:59 PM
4

Also in this day and age, at least for western women, they are fully consenting to having a child I 99 percent of situations....is this thing real?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 11:23 PM
1

If anyone starts talking about there being a huge wage gap*
/r/MensRights16/02/19 09:57 PM
3

Also maybe not a guy.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 06:22 PM
1

Yeah I know it won't.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:10 AM
2

I'm somewhat ok with this as long as there is men only parking and or the woman's parking is at the top or furthest away Edit: somewhat feel the same about this as I do about woman only Uber. Kinda let the market handle it.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 08:34 AM
1

It's not and it just gives people an excuse to complain about men's rights subs. I'd say it's a 50/50 chance it's a post from one of the anti subs.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:24 AM
1

Yeah...wish people would stop this crap. A lot of shitty people who like to declare themselves feminists. A lot of shitty people declare themselves men's rights activists as well.....
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:15 AM
0

No rape is funny. A good joke involving rape somehow can be funny.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 05:07 AM
1

Heard him in an interview a while back and honestly thought he was doing a douchey millenial character. He's acting weird man.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 04:46 AM
1

This is a legal advice sub Reddit. They will remove stuff that is not about proper advice for the victim. I've seen them do it before, this one also being socially motivated or not.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:11 PM
2

Yeah, I'm not perfect. Easiest way I found to avoid doing it is simply don't label them beyond using words like asshole. Call the reasoning stupid and don't attribute it to a group, just a person at most
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:02 AM
2

Problem is people are so keen on reacting to one shitty person and then labeling them, which assigns them to a group, which then makes the enemy a stereotype and easy to fight against because there is a protocol. Nazi...we protest and write letters and try to get them fired. If we can get away from labels then maybe this wouldn't happen as much. As for the numbers...yeah, I don't get it....maybe just massive numbers of people who are teenagers who just sit home all day on the computer and rage a…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:52 AM
2

Maybe the move would be to create the sun's and just have one post then lock it. The one post would say: We stand together to ensure that everyone has equal rights under the law regardless of their sexual identity, skin colour/ethnic background or country of origin. We won't encourage hate but promote equality. ....or some sappy shit like that
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:27 AM
10

No...please dont. If that kind of tactic worked, there wouldn't be half the trump supporters there are. Just be better, do better. Don't do the same shit we complain about.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 02:27 AM
2

Doesn't this person have something better to do with their time? There are some little shits on this sub but all subs have that and most...75 percent maybe, of the posts are pure equality posts. These people need fucking lives. Why is it so threatening to advocate for equal rights for men?
/r/MensRights11/02/19 02:25 AM
2

It's good either way is the point
/r/MensRights11/02/19 01:40 AM
5

Would love that. Had a similar response to apostle I made on menslib. I politely responded. They don't care though. Don't fit the narrative and you are satan
/r/MensRights11/02/19 01:29 AM
2

Yeah, agreed. First offense and no death or permanent injury. Does it one more time and treat it more as if someone could die, which they can but it's kinda unlikely.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 08:47 AM
11

It's always overlooked. The world was a very brutal place. Only very very recently has it not been a cluster fuck to be born and expect not to die horribly or have a kind of shitty life. Maybe last 150 years at best?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/19 01:35 AM
5

It really is garbage and the worst part is they don't think it is. Way to bring down capitalism with an emoji......also, I guarantee there are people who own vice who enjoy the capitalist aspect of owning it.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 06:54 PM
5

It should be a civil case
/r/MensRights25/01/19 06:41 PM
2

Racially informed policy. That sounds like it won't lead to a bunch of problems...
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:33 PM
3

Part of the issue I have with people mentioning these kinds of facts is that the question always comes up with "why?". As in why do you care if one ethnic group does x y or z? (not race, races don't exist. Its a complete made up biological bro science bull shit. Look up the history of the word) It only makes real sense to bring up stats if you are looking for examples of racism (people treating others a certain way mainly based on skin colour, usually negative). The example of all Kenyans are go…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:51 AM
1

Every woman I know would describe themselves as feminist of asked. There are woman who get their speeches posted to this sub that are self described feminists and support men's rights. Doesn't matter. Do you. Have fun
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:29 AM
0

Bad examples don't make it a rule how about. They fought for voting rights as they should. Still after voting were not going to be equal. They would have never been drafted anyway. You are taking am extremely one sided look at the history. I'm done. Good luck to you
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:15 AM
0

They are not. You are massively generalizing. New wave is something special in that department but the old waves were heavily mixed for sure. Have to be blind not to see that.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:56 AM
-3

I know.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:30 PM
-3

It's annoying when feminists group all men in categories and generalize with data. It's bigoted. Edit: what you are doing is the same bullshit
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:31 PM
7

Modern social activism seems like alot of it is motivated by desire for power, attention and money making. People need to be the change and try not to generalize as much. It is not all men, feminists, religious people, skin colour (geezus, are we still dividing people based on pigment) etc.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:22 PM
-1

Don't do that.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:19 PM
0

I think it's a combination of having guys in this sub that ARE as bad as the extreme feminists they complain about and also having actual feminist trills trying to stoke the fire so the sub will get banned. Honestly SOME of the talk in this sub equivalent to a black person screaming that all white people are racist and that only white people can be racist. They are exactly what they are complaining about.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 08:44 PM
15

Easily settled civil court ruling then? Not a fan of "men can never understand a women's life" or vise versa kind of talk but women can never really understand the level of the sense of betrayal and wasted life this can be for a man. This is life destroying and him doing what he's doing might be the only way he can emotionally make it through that situation. Good luck to him
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:56 PM
5

It's insane that anyone could try to justify a law like that. Crumble families? The damage was already done when the mother cheated. It's a gross cycle
/r/MensRights06/01/19 08:06 PM
6

And a lot of hate but it is still the opposite of a hate sub. The sole purpose is to protect equal rights for men. Hateful people yes, but then all subs on Reddit are hate subs, including that one. Hopefully in the coming years, people like that person will be looked down on rather than supported politically or socially. The "my opinion of morals are absolute and they conveniently allows me to be a bigot and operate like an authoritarian as I please...oh and I'm shameless about it" shit needs to…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:00 PM
3

I hope more people read you comments in this post rather then make easy attacks based on a clickbait title
/r/MensRights23/12/18 07:50 PM
6

Yeah, was gonna say, were they false or just un-proovable? Something seemed up about her accusations especially that they seemed one sided and they were probably both guilty of the same stuff but no proof she lied, just didn't prove her case
/r/MensRights19/12/18 08:30 PM
4

Yeah, if they make a guy pay for a kid that he finds out later isn't his, no reason the lesbian partner in this relationship shouldn't have to do the same
/r/MensRights16/12/18 06:56 PM
3

This is an old one. New to you, great. Gem gem gem le gem Anyway, yeah it's bullshit. Like there's no concept that it's incredibly uncomfortable for most guys to sit with knees together. Once again, women express supreme ignorance of male biology. Maybe a panel of women can decide how it's appropriate of men to sit in public
/r/MensRights10/12/18 01:42 AM
2

Yeah, not getting laid doesn't mean they don't work.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 04:47 AM
1

Atetheonion
/r/MensRights07/12/18 12:09 AM
1

Not the case. To be sexist, you must express a a bias opinion of someone due to their gender. You stated things that just are not the case. You are basing it off of feminist theory and definitions that are new and politically motivated. Definitions can change but sexism and racism changing is not organic. It's being forced for the purpose of political power.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 01:42 AM
80

Yeah...that's not sexism or racism.....that is oppression due to sexism or racism. The mental gymnastics they do to allow they to be ignorant bigots is amazing
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:01 AM
-1

Everybody is getting angry but I don't see a link. It wouldn't surprise me bit something like this needs a link
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:10 PM
1

I'm not arguing if he wants it and what that means, I'm just asking of the greentext is being purposely misleading. Like according to it the mother is forcing the kid to wear a dress and he doesn't want to. A much easier case to argue for than the one where the kids " likes" or actually likes the dress and the father is trying to stop chemical transition for a child
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:44 PM
1

Yeah, it says in greentext "James prefers to be a boy" . Think that's likely a lie.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:33 PM
1

That's what I'm pointing out. The Green text said the kid didn't even want it I thought. Seems like a lie, however much it's all bullshit they are doing that to him, seems like Green text threw it in there to make it more anger inducing but don't think it's a fact, regardless of the mother manipulated him or not
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:32 PM
0

I do think think it's right to chemically transition a kid but aside from that, just wonder if there is proof that the kid wants to be a boy. Just curious cause it's mentioned and that should be the main issue outside of the obvious but it's thrown in there but not expanded.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:22 PM
1

Yeah...I don't think lgbt are discriminated against as far as stems go. I'd argue there a higher percentage there
/r/MensRights29/11/18 10:37 AM
0

For the purposes of this scholarship, I identify as all those things. Prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 10:36 AM
1

It's still crazy. I like the method ari Shafir has mentioned in podcasts; just look at a higher percentage of women when looking at applicants but do it blindly after the fact. The cream should rise to the top, you are still giving women a harder look but in the end only better applicants will get it.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 07:49 AM
1

I agree with alot of what's being said but the women still have to pass the courses and them getting in is largely based on highschool marks which isn't always the definitive metric for success in stems
/r/MensRights27/11/18 01:03 AM
8

Lol, that would be hilarious unintended result. Also possible, all the men there are highly motivated poon hounds, to put it crudely
/r/MensRights27/11/18 12:50 AM
7

Yeah so gender is a social construct unless it means excluding men from science and engineering programs
/r/MensRights27/11/18 12:46 AM
1

a better way to solve this would be to limit women in social science programs so they have to apply to engineering courses
/r/MensRights27/11/18 12:45 AM
4

Not official quotas but...Harvard and Asian students?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 12:41 AM
1

I support the general idea behind BLM but you have to admit, the leaders are full of racists and the rhetoric is often anti white male, not police corruption, political corruption or systemic racism, it's ironically, that all the males of a certain skin colour are trash.....which is an idea that they are fighting against because BLM mostly is about black men who to a much higher proportion suffer from police criminal assault and murder
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:50 AM
1

KEEP THE SAME ENERGY is my favourite saying about all this kind of bullshit. Basically don't abandon logic for everything that doesn't go your way and demand people respect logic and ideas only when you like them. Fucking selfish hypocrites.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 09:06 PM
1

I feel like this is just bait at some point. Like a troll or something
/r/MensRights20/11/18 05:53 PM
1

Yeah, I only suggested in public he's not saying that stuff. I have no idea either way other than the change I suggested is him becoming more Hollywood and filthy rich, so to protect that he has to at least pretend to have progressive views
/r/MensRights20/11/18 05:27 PM
2

Context does matter and the topic matters. Again, if we are abandoning context in the subs discussion and the ability of the subs participants to not stereotype a whole group and use critical thinking then there's no point in anything. I've spoken against the blanket statements of ALL lesbians or all feminists but to totally abandon any sort of trends or ideas the way you are suggesting, especially ones contributing factors to men's rights, we will slow the progress we are trying to make to a co…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 02:26 PM
2

So he generalized the small group as opposed to the whole group. So he's pointing out a trait that he has noticed and you hate that? That dismisses most of science (not that what he said was scientifically based) bit if you are even going to dismiss that then there's no point is saying anything about anything cause it's all genralizations
/r/MensRights20/11/18 12:07 PM
1

I saw that interview but think that was early family feud or possibly before. It's an asshole stance to take for sure, just no idea of he's changed.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 10:02 AM
0

Yeah. Think he has softened since the family fued thing panned out and he's become mainstream hollywood.....or at least he doesn't talk about that stuff publically
/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:17 AM
5

I just watched it. The initial jokes were kinda bad but overall I didn't think it was as awful as some make it seem. I have my own issues with some Ellen stuff from the past but I was expecting worse the way people were ranting
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:18 PM
9

Some gay guys also are super catty and judgemental towards woman. Think it might be a jealously thing
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:12 PM
56

Dude literally said "some". Did the opposite of a generalization.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:10 PM
5

Well she had Steve Harvey on and was all buddy buddy but has made snide comments about any male politician that isn't 100 percent into gay rights (it's 2018, I get it). Steve is one of those behind closed doors homophobes I think. What he said on television just scratches the surface
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:09 PM
2

The privileged are the rich and people in powerful positions throughout history and always has been. More likely a man will get to those positions but a woman who was a noble or elite class always had far more rights than 99 percent of men. Some of those rights were different, yes but easily a more privileged life. Both international men's and women's Days feel like a bunch of humans fighting (discussing and bringing awareness) for rights that privileged classes have had throughout history. Dist…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:23 PM
3

Eh...funny, not really a men's rights thing.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 01:30 PM
3

Ah, it made me laugh. I didn't even realize the sub when I clicked the picture so took me by surprise.....just like the men falsely accused of rape likely were
/r/MensRights15/11/18 11:41 PM
2

The willingness and follow-through of actually commiting the horrific act is what makes the crime bad, not what was going through her mind while she did it. If she's able to do something like that, she is capable of doing it again.... So like people can commit straight up murders for kicks but not be tried as much because they don't get off on the act or aren't murderers in their hearts?
/r/MensRights09/11/18 05:30 AM
2

What site is that hosted on?
/r/MensRights09/11/18 04:06 AM
13

Yeah, my first thought was it's because he's black. It's stupid and should be talked about more in this sub. The way black men are treated is a men's right issue. It's often a purely racism issue or economic but it's also gender based. Not that black women are treated perfectly but there is a reason a higher number become college graduates vs the men.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 05:34 PM
0

I don't mind mentioning double standards. I'm sick of people in this sub telling me all feminists are alike and they have never met one that didn't hate men or think all men are rapists or thoughts along those lines. You are doing exactly what you are complaining about. I feel like I am talking with guys in from the age of 10 to 25 who think they have figured out everything or actual trolls from radical feminist subs and movements trying to paint men rights in a bad light.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:47 PM
1

Yeah, my example obviously is anecdotal. Maybe it was my generation. I'll admit, see that kill yourself meme so maybe younger generation does it
/r/MensRights17/10/18 09:53 PM
26

I agree. Unless he had previously stated exactly how he would react in such a situation, this is close to thought crime and is bullshit. The only MRA issue here is that while men might tend to be more effectively violent, women do just as shitty stuff that could easily be argued as emotionally or psychologically violent as men's physical actions. Perfect example of this, no guy I know told another male to kill himself. Heard it several times from girls directed to other girls. Just pure nastines…
/r/MensRights17/10/18 04:05 PM
7

It's the same as that held at gunpoint joke in the parking lot which i think is much better. In that one at least you can assume the guy was consenting even though he was held at gunpoint
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:47 AM
-2

I like her first part, not so much her first hashtag. What was the valid reasons the Republicans couldn't confirm Obama's choice for all that time? She's the same fucking rerun of all the other right wing "reasonable" diverse poster children. First Ann Coulter as a woman, the gay dude....Greek name....ffs, anyway, gay. And now Candice who tows every fucking party line while throwing out a half decent truth bomb. Fuck off
/r/MensRights29/09/18 11:58 PM
1

But then you decide that other people don't belong in the category because some claim and act a certain way. You are missing a major logical step here man. Nevermind. Good luck with your MRA fights.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 10:40 PM
1

Feminist.....geezus. that is a label that you decided what it means and who gets it based on our previous convos. The people I mentioned don't get that label according to you.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 04:12 PM
1

Yeah. The sub kinda creeps me out tbh. This sub bothers me at times as it feels a little to red pill like but that one seems like a brainwashing cult.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 03:13 PM
1

The label you assign is what that means to you
/r/MensRights29/09/18 03:12 PM
1

....everyone is the same with the label you give them
/r/MensRights29/09/18 02:36 AM
1

Geezus that's bad
/r/MensRights29/09/18 01:13 AM
1

To that first part, not assuming, at least not in a label or ignorance way. You literally don't meet non radical faminists, I went into why I think that may be the case so I have to assume some things including that it may be simply how you define feminism as to why you don't meet them.. I don't know you but it is really odd you know nobody who has a less extreme view. They are literally on this sub....daily, weekly?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 11:42 PM
2

Well does boat not mostly suck because there is no user base?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:46 PM
7

Yeah, I felt the same way it seems more like a feminism sub that allows men to exists as opposed to a men's right sub focusing on mens issues.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:45 PM
1

I don't think the "right" can or should be. Again, you are falling into the same trap. Both ways of viewing people and tackling issues and problems are wrong and leads to more bullshit. The world can't be perfect but at least try not to be almost exactly like the people you are complaining the most about
/r/MensRights27/09/18 10:58 PM
3

I have no fucking clue why you personally don't see any evidence for their existence....maybe leave the house? Have discussions with people not on the internet? I have met both in real life and on the internet and I get that it seems one sided these days but it obviously is not. I don't like a lot of the views of apparent feminists and I consider myself one but labels are stupid in the end. Primarily used nowadays so we can quickly (and more importantly, ignorantly) out someone into a "evil" box…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:53 PM
5

They just aren't vocal so that's why. I will still, if pushed, argue that I am a feminist against more extreme people. This is why labels sucks and we need to discuss individual issues and not worry about labeling them this or that for political or social points.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:21 PM
1

Yeah, she's just showing her tribalism stripes. "I have non conservative views too!!!!!" But everytime something like this pops up, she tows the party line. Same with climate change. She's smart but playing a game and gets caught up in us vs them thinking. He may be innocent but he isn't a good example. Some dudes released from prison after false accusations, some university students who were proven innocent by texts later on etc. Those are our examples.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:19 PM
9

He did that and he also did some literal predator things. There can be more than one thing he did. By all accounts, he was a predator but a lot of Hollywood people has said or implied that there are many more women that took a deal. He did both.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 10:56 PM
1

Unfortunately the answer is immigrants. I still know many where the wife doesn't work or works a token part time job and has zero marketable job skills. Most of their husbands are not much better, I agree, but they have a 20 year plus job history and experience in the market
/r/MensRights02/09/18 03:28 AM
7

Yup. Mention that and their response will make it quite clear they care more about you claiming any harm done to men more then the comparison. Many don't want the voice out there at all and claiming that people making direct comparisons is wrong is quite brutal in itself.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:12 PM
3

Aquital or dropping of charges is not a false accusation. They use simar logic in the article and kinda make a leap. I can believe the premise in general that false accusations are.going up or they are actually considering them more but this seems like skewed numbers similar to wage gap.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:42 PM
4

It helps that she's actually been told her comments were in appropriate at the time she made them. Unfortunately that might not happen in other government houses around the world.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 03:12 PM
6

Or ya know...everyone did. Go troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 12:59 AM
1

Well according to the definition of feminism, they shouldn't....but we know a lot do. I agree though, I get kinda tired of anti feminism stuff here as opposed to mensrights posts. Ofcourse they can be related, not denying that. At least this one made me laugh
/r/MensRights01/07/18 01:08 PM
5

He seemed to stand up for a lot from what I heard.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 08:24 AM
1

Yeah, don't see this as a men's right issue as it's mostly just a one parent kidnapped a kid angle. Genesee doesn't matter. With the political mist surrounding the pic, wouldn't matter the circumstances either way if a father kidnapped the kid from country of origin or vise versa. Not what the uproar is about. They aren't ignoring the story because it was a mother who kidnapped vs a father, they are ignoring it because the narrative is trump is evil (I believe he's a piece shit fyi). Interesting…
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:06 AM
1

What a piece of human trash
/r/MensRights21/06/18 01:22 AM
2

Great quote. We aren't dealing with horrible ideologies as much as horrible people. They happen to have some aspect of a generally accepted moral idea on their side (equal rights, no bigotry) but it's largely being voiced by people who are shitty and angry and mainly want their own power, not equal rights. Its the main issue I see now. Hypocracy and no self policing within movements. Infallablility is not good for society. Also making people the enemies, not ideas is horrible. Don't look at a pe…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 02:10 PM
-1

He's so woke cause only women group people by their gender and then judge solely based on that. He's either an idiot or someone trying to give r/mensrights a bad name on purpose so they can link to it
/r/MensRights10/06/18 09:39 PM
1

Some clearly hate feminism and group women with stupid stereotypes, yes. Issues abound. Its depressing really. Another mens issues sub is too far in the other direction I find. Doesn't have to be a perfect sub but at least the thinking most people use should be consistent. Problem is I think we are dealing with a lot of angry people with a lot of time and limited experience in real life. Keep up the good fight
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:52 PM
1

Yeah, it tends not to work here very often unfortunately. Tooany people are doing the classic "I hate all white people cause they are racist and racism is bad" type of logic with feminism. Difference is that Hollywood supports feminists doing it in a sexist and racist way
/r/MensRights07/06/18 12:08 AM
8

Oh please fuck off. Its assholes not mens rights activists. No where does her character go against any mra general ideas or dogmas. The level to which non acadics are targeting mras in...odd. just taregt assholes...bits its hard to write an article saying assholes are bad There's no imaginary image people can conjure up
/r/MensRights07/06/18 12:05 AM
1

Good point. Only issue might be of we put people.....as tends to happen with other sexual crimes, will automatically unfavorably targeting men, but yeah, make it clear somehow it's any person.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 08:26 PM
4

The main idea is that we can't let movements for equality turn speech (social interactions) into criminal offenses based on social pressure. It will ruin Western civilization to police thought and simple behaviour to this level.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 04:43 PM
13

You did but that person saw what they wanted for the purpose of their counter argument
/r/MensRights11/05/18 04:32 PM
1

Calling someone a cunt is a sub meant to discuss men's issues, specifically things relating to disproving stereotypes and misconceptions about men rights and possibly relating to 3rd wave feminism propaganda hurts the movement overall, as opposed to helping it as you should want to. Don't be that guy. Be better than our detractors. You are being what we hate, resorting to name calling and bulshit that kills discourse. Feminism is fighting itself as it's movement towards equality is being hijacke…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:02 PM
2

Yeah, keep that name-calling out of here. Want to show you are better than them? Resort to facts, not name calling and superficial judgements (fat or ugly this or that). It's just sad and shows how immature you are in how you deal with anger or intolerance
/r/MensRights08/05/18 06:57 PM
-1

I agree that the pay gap is what it is, mostly fiction as far as it's magnitude, bit her being able to make a large sum doesn't disprove it. That's just faulty logic
/r/MensRights15/04/18 07:33 PM
-1

Yeah.....can't have nice things like reasonablele discourse about an interesting experiment with that clownery
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:26 PM
3

Its not the level of reporting that would bother me, its the cause for the violent act. For two boys, they would blame their gender, for two girls, was it their mental state, bad culture, male oppression, they are victims of abuse? etc.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:16 PM
1

Yeah, it really is about equality and consistentcy. That's all most feminists (or non extreme or old school or whatever) want and that's all I want.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 07:01 PM
1

Agreed. I shouldn't get to decide that an abortion can't happen, that's kinda fucked up, but I should be able to financially distance myself from a one night stand or ex having a kid I don't want and forcing me to be involved with the mother for the rest of my life
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:59 PM
4

Ignoring her rape of someone else, I think that's a good response and with the weight she carries with the she community, namely angry white women. The not cool parts are debatable ofcourse bit at least this is leaning towards the non career killer level. Still the no proof and we fuck you aspect
/r/MensRights02/02/18 04:10 AM
9

*Most people are not against equality. Absolutes like that are why we are in the trouble we are in. Issue by issue basis.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:08 PM
1

Rich oppress poor and powerful oppress powerless. Gender and skin colour and religion are all just subcategories at best. A Pretty much all groups have it shit. One doesn't negate the other
/r/MensRights21/01/18 06:16 PM
1

Good point. People are allowed to say and think what they want, but, punishing someone based on a social agreement is how the law operates and trying to punish based on zero evidence because of some narrative of social justice is similar to side stepping rule of law. Also, trying to punish people to this level is akin to slander.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 09:59 AM
27

I don't think she says the cause to be fair. She just says it's a privilege. Everyone assumed she was blaming men..... which I guess she could be. She might be saying something similar to male privaledge is not having a period or something that's more of a social construct but not mens fault
/r/MensRights15/10/17 04:50 PM
2

Capitalists and hitler. Hitler and socialism. Something and another thing. Lost of people in both camps, but this situation isn't about anti capitalists.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:28 PM
53

Will always upvote this. Father's aren't the real heroes though. A good parent is.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:55 PM
-4

Some of the commentators in this thread. I weirdly don't mind this post as much, I just don't like the ridiculously hypocritical anti Feminist comments that follow
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:55 AM
4

Which is the whole point of feminism and mens rights advocates. This sub is at least meeting some resistance lately to the toxic posts, apparently unironically, mimicking the bullshit posted by self sexists and racists claiming to be feminists or social warriors.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:53 AM
1

The obvious hypocracy if feminists say there is nothing wrong with it, yes. Just wanted to sound off on the obvious logic to not do the same hypocracy stuff people bitch about feminist doing. Think it needs a reminder everytime we get an article like this
/r/MensRights29/07/17 05:55 PM
3

I see someone being shitty as a loss. A fucked up life is always tragic in my book
/r/MensRights29/07/17 12:42 AM
10

Yup. Female models should be paid more. They have more value. It makes sense. They are also way more female models because woman's fashion has waaay more job opportunities. Again, makes sense. Hopefully people in this sub can be logically consistent and agree that the stats in the story make sense.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 12:34 AM
12

Yeah, but I feel like this is something we should support. Salary based on generated revenue for your role is how it should be. Woman's fashion is a more lucrative industry and known woman models can get more publicity then men. They have more value and should be paid more.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 12:27 AM
12

I hope this becomes the golden age for lawsuits for this type of crap. Similar to people sueing the police. It didn't make things perfect but helped crack down on some of the crazier bullshit out there. Brought it to peoples attention, laws enacted or actually enforced etc.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 12:13 AM
8

Yeah. We need to get away from redpill type stuff here. It adds nothing to the discourse. Generalizations like that are exactly why we have a MRA sub in the first place. Just because generalizing isnt against men, doesn't make it right. Stop people from making these flat out ignorant generalizations and MRA wouldn't be needed
/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:39 AM
1

Ok
/r/MGTOW05/07/17 06:19 PM
-2

Maybe they love each other?
/r/MGTOW05/07/17 03:55 AM
1

I feel the exact same way BUT, i have literally had people tell me they wouldn't want to know. Its messed up to libe a lie like that but again, thats their choice and makes the whole "dont want to get involved in other peoples relationship" thing make more sense. Basically a lot of people will make tou out to be the bad guy. Also, better have fucking proof, which is tough
/r/MensRights27/06/17 10:30 PM
1

Thays obvious. Im talking about her revealing to the guy that her friend/his gf was cheating. Some people dont want to get involved in other peoples relationships
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:23 PM
-1

Nice. Usually revealing that type of info to a friend is a tough call to make but bragging about it...not so much there
/r/MensRights27/06/17 12:28 AM
5

Yeah, men dominant league sports is actually where you dont need the qualifier. Its the top league really, not a mens league. Women are free to play in it but its not vise versa, so womens leagues/sports need the qualifier, hence John macs response i think. Tennis is a little difderent but the spirit of the argument remains the same
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:37 PM
17

Yeah, would be a tough study to prove. Same with me though, every person i know involved in cheating has been female cheating on male. Only once was it the reverse and the woman had already cheated on the guy at that point in the marriage. This article seems dumb as shot if its about cheating back after someone has cheated on you. Opposite of an adult relationship. End it or accept it, male or female Edit: seems like another issue where nutters try to make it about gender when its not. Its shitt…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:53 PM
3

Just because he wasn't aware, doesn't mean its still not stupid
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:04 PM
11

She was also emotionally devistated when he did hit her, don't think that was all from the hit.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/17 12:12 AM
1

Sort of isn't because it happened because of messed up family court or whatever, although originally because of men's treatment, she wasn't trying to get away with shit due to being a woman but due to it being a messed up law. If he sacrificed his career though or supported her during her coming up in comedy, he kinda deserves it. He's not getting it for life, just for a few years. This is almost a feminist pass denied for the guy because if it were truly equal, he'd be getting it for life, depe…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 10:32 AM
89

Geezus that's awful. They could pay for an egg donor with that money
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 10:26 AM
6

Yeah, the description description it a bit of a disservice or possible does exactly what it set out to do with the baoty title. Thanks for the synop
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:09 PM
16

Yeah, the description of dear white people doesn't help you to not judge it a certain way. But I basically decided not to watch it because the title alone just seemed to exhausting so I skipped it. Glad to hear it's about a topic I've actually been pseudo preaching about
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:00 PM
21

Yup, there s absolutely nothing wrong, ethically or morally, wth taking your used condom with you. In fact, it's even courteous. It's one of those things, anyone speaking up about it, probably want it for devious means.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 03:55 PM
1

Also, manspreading is easily solvable by sitting down in the spot next to them and the guy mob ng or simply saying "excuse me". Putting a bag on several seats on a full transit car
/r/MensRights20/04/17 01:50 PM
0

Yup. It's purpose is to sensationalize the story though. I knew.lots of kids with learning disabilities and they were just as likely to be socially more mature as anyone else
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:07 PM
-1

That's awful, but learning disabilities doesn't mean the kid is stupid. I wish people would stop throwing in that crap like it makes the crime worse so people can yank their outrage dick harder. Same as that "disabled" kid who had A.D.D. Doesn't make the crime worse...It's fucking a.d.d. The crimes are bad because they are kids and the preds are adults in position of power, stop trying to imply its some evil genius super predator buttrapimg a kid with Downs.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:47 AM
4

If they were alone walking down a street late at night or in an alley, I'd say this is appropriate. At a concert with security at a public event, don't resort to violence.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:31 PM
3

After all the other stuff, she could be trying to paint him in a better light for the kids. All the shit I heard or saw was on tabloid covers so don't know how much she said and what she said about him. Also of which, it could be true what she did say. It is one sided, this stuff in general, but I suspect none of us know what is true about HM or what stuff she actually said in context
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:17 PM
3

Yup. Welcome to the struggle of belonging to the MRA sub
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:04 AM
1

It's not that they are privaledged in the overall sense, it's that they HAVE some privaledge. Everyone does in some way pretty much, especially in the western world. It's ok to have some privledge and still have some complaints
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:02 AM
3

That's the biggest problem with the last two years, groups and movements that were established to combat bigotry, unironically in their eyes, acting like the biggest bigots out there. From some BLM leaders being blatantly racist and sexist, to feminist and MRAs being overtly sexist when discussing and blaming (but often not offering real solutions) others based on gender. It leads to limited or no progress and gets all the idiots controlling the narrative in the media of all these important move…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 07:59 AM
1

Yeah, you might be right
/r/MensRights27/01/17 07:48 AM
5

Yeah, I kind of get the impression that this thread is full of a lot of people wanting to complain about the rally but don't know the exact reason why and are doing their best to ignore any arguments for why the rally may have been justified and ultimately, why is was good to have, even if it was a little dramatic. My suspicion is, the rally wasn't about sucking Donald dick so gotta figure out a reason to bash it. Think there's a bit of a make America/alt right overlap with some MRAs so we are g…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:25 AM
2

Yeah, there's video evidence of him saying such things, nevermind the tweets. So yeah, seems like she is being willfully ignorant die to her distaste for Hillary.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:19 AM
16

I use to get downvoted to hell when I complained about posts like this and similar articles basically designed to stir up trouble and not solve anything. We are ultimately here to spread awareness and discuss solutions and options when dealing with oppression and maybe provide support to men dealing with specific issues. Glad to see someone can post what you did and not get downvoted to hell. This sub might be turning around.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:10 AM
2

Well said.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 07:44 PM
2

As soon as I saw the 1 in 4 stat, I was thinking what an odd stat to state. If the wanted to give a breakdown of how homelessness includes everyone, I get that. Still stood out to me.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:08 AM
1

I'm saying that's the mentality, not arguing it's a good mentality to have
/r/MensRights08/01/17 07:54 PM
1

Maybe that's what spurs a lot of shitty people to commit DV. If they hold power over them in some way; a man who earns all the money, the female spouse of a female soldier who knows the army/whatever will harshly treat an accusation, a woman using the "pussypass" to work out her issues on a man. So the two parts to the equation are them being shitty and them having power or leverage. Edit:. So lesbian relationships might have the stronger dynamic of both parties thinking they have the pass and n…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 06:56 AM
1

Saw this quote before...could have sworn there was a guy in that list. Did someone "edit" it?
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:21 PM
1

Me too. It's part of the reason this sub grates me and I ignore it from time to time. This is a great post but these all encompassing generalizations are hypocritical to a sometimes humerous, but usually annoying level. Pot kettle black etc.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 09:15 PM
3

I don't understand having the complete hate for someone because their views directly oppress you and then calling for the exact same thing on them as soon as you get a little bit of power. Fycking hypocrisy Dems or repubs, crazies running it on both sides
/r/MensRights15/11/16 02:25 AM
2

The thing is...she has to admit it, that she lied for it to completely go away. No amount of counter evidence would clear the man's record other than that regardless if he is fond guilty or not. That is why it's important to not automatically take a victims or "victim's" word.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 04:51 PM
1

I think a separate one is a better solution. There are legitimate concerns over people being harassed by the assaulters. Separate ones doesn't solve male on male issues though
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:30 PM
3

I wonder how much if this shit would drop if we the internet read only for people under 18 and possibly those in mental care facilities
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:16 PM
38

The joke is correct. It's making fun of the false statistic. You missed the joke I believe, while being aware of it.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:09 AM
7

They don't want the bad boy either. They usually want the fun guy. The guy that will make them laugh and take them on adventures. The bad boy persona is the easiest to mimic this, just like cockiness or arrogance mimics self confidence but are not the same
/r/MensRights01/09/16 05:58 PM
3

I meant progressive in the literal sense, that we are not gaining any ground in NRA or equality issues in general with that bullshit
/r/MensRights02/08/16 04:17 AM
1

But also, people shouting about the evils of it don't get to pick and choose oose what it means for everyone either
/r/MensRights02/08/16 02:12 AM
2

Actual women I talk to on a daily basis. Yes the extremists and usually more vocal, that's part of what makes them extremist.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 02:12 AM
-4

I suggest you bother to research all the women who identify as feminist and don't follow that bullshit
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:39 PM
2

I dont have an attitude of indifference. That bullshit he was saying gives them more legitimacy, if in a superficial way, and its not progressive at all.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:39 PM
-9

Your level of hate and generalizing groups will get society nowhere, but good luck.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 05:00 PM
-6

^ This is also an example of why this sub is frowned upon
/r/MensRights01/08/16 04:46 PM
-10

I dont know. Looks like the one small dude made contact with her several times first before the drink throwing and then those guys 2 on 1 the dude. Tough call.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/16 05:10 AM
12

Yeah, pisses me off whenever people mention looks or weight in these subreddits...or really in general. Has nothing to do with validity of views any.ore than gender and skin colour and no one gives a fck if you think someone is ugly
/r/MensRights25/07/16 08:03 PM
3

Yeah, as bad as Germany may be rape laws wise, I can't see those guys skating if she didn't consent to the sex act. Shitty dudes to film it against her protests for sure, but according to what people have said he changed would make the ruling make more sense, she consented to sex. This is of course ignoring the drugged aspect, as to whether she or all of them were fucked up on something
/r/MensRights19/07/16 01:38 PM
3

Exactly. It's a "they have a horrible relationship dynamic" issue, not men's rights
/r/MensRights15/06/16 05:23 AM
5

Brainwashed moron
/r/MensRights02/06/16 05:21 PM
13

Fight for your rights, don't fight to silence other. There's a big difference but anyone else fighting for their rights draws attention from them so they freak out. I don't agree with Milo on a lot of stuff but let him fucking speak. You don't like it, don't go. He's not shouting it over the campus loudspeaker. I can't fathom how an institution so built upon expressing ideas is fostering and allowing this bullshit. That one with Milo and others shouted down everytime someone wanted to speak was …
/r/MensRights02/06/16 05:08 PM
3

You might be right, still wouldn't vote trumo
/r/MensRights01/06/16 04:11 AM
2

If she is profitable, they always forgive (with partially the exception of mel Gibson). At this time I don't think so but if she turns this into being another feminist darling, then it could happen. I know the red flags for me went off when she was dating a women and she claimed to be bi, which is a common thing to say for a lot of less than obvious stereotypical lesbians in Hollywood. Reports and rumours and people gossiping basically said she highly prefers women or is flat out a 99% lesbian. …
/r/MensRights31/05/16 10:59 PM
2

Thanks doug
/r/MensRights31/05/16 07:04 PM
1

Is it possible that if she can't pay, she will go to jail?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 11:55 AM
1

That's my view to a t. In the past, more rights came with additional responsibilities that were usually connected. Sime didnt but still should have been their right. Now it's a game of listing anything thats a want where they can skew info that a dvide exists along gender lines to prove the discrimination. Extremely selective and obviously a lot related to anything that's university required fields despite women outnumbering men in university....
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:56 AM
-1

Rant here: Honestly, I look at a of this, the black lives matter movement, feminism, Trump, hillary and everything nowadays and think it's all a distraction from the true inequalities, which is the economic divide. Rich get richer, make the new laws and we as puppets fight over race or gender or even religion ignoring the fact that people can work for a company for 50 hours a week and not have enough to live on, that major corporations like Walmart, subsudize their workers salary with government…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:46 AM
0

It use to be. The, 2nd wave I guess, feminists, some of them have come forward saying it's off the rails. Gloria...steinman....crap, forgot her name, she has made some light comments saying something to that effect. And again, I've been down voted for this here, but most of the women I talk to don't believe this crap, them being educated and self described feminists. You just don't hear from them in chat rooms, blogging, on Reddit or at rallies. They are too busy with careers, raising families a…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:37 AM
1

"If feminism, at its core, is about the power to fully empower women, then we have to make space for both sides.". ....of women, but not men. That's the problem right there imo. A result of feminism could be to empower women. Makes sense. It is not what feminism is at its core. It is fighting for equal rights under the law and in society. A woman doing the same job at the same level, should get paid the same. A woman should have the same rights to education and freedom of expression as any other…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:28 AM
1

A good similar example is all the Republicans who have gay children who differ on status quo Republican views on da gays
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:17 AM
1

Eyyyup
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:20 AM
5

Good. These people are insane and their insanity is too often being validated by people in power.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:51 PM
0

Agreed. No reason to make jokes like that. Either it is a false claim or not. Felt the SE when the Amy shumer stuff was going down. I could get on the discussion about the validity of the stealing jokes/ hack arguments, but when people start talking about her looks in the same post, you are just fueling the retorts that it was all about her being a woman or unnatractive
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:45 PM
2

I was trying to argue a similar point in another post. They don't care. The sub seems to be so against the idea that a man can do something wrong as long as the girl wanted some aspect of the encounter, that they have full zealot type blinders on. It's reactionary to the "everything is rape" from their feminist counterparts.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:59 PM
1

A lot of them are not doing it because of their opinion in the justness of the law, they are doing it because they are desperate and some are in mortal danger where they are. The person agruing against the law in the video on the other hand, fits what you are saying. I personally, believe the law is important but describing them as criminals is usually an attempt to paint a picture of undesirable people who are possiblly morally bankrupt and will contribute negatively to society. I think there a…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:53 PM
2

..... I get how it is a law and a crime as I've stated, I'm saying if you are having a discussion with people about whether a law is just, the criminality based on that law is a redundant point to bring up. The discussion isn't about whether the law exists, it's about whether it should or shouldn't and if it is morally right to punish these people. I shouldn't have to say this yet again, but I don't think we should let in any immigrant who wants to come in and the law is stupid, I'm saying if yo…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:24 PM
1

I'm not arguing that. I'm just saying if you are discussing a topic about whether the law is just, it doesn't make sense in the context of the discussion to say it's a crime and they are criminals because of that law.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:13 PM
1

I know they are ignored or not considered "these types of feminists" or real feminists by a lot of people in this sub and other counter subs, but, mist of the people I know who would agree to the statement that they are a feminist are fully capable of having a calm discussion about these topics
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:29 PM
0

I meant crimes beyond just them being an illegal immigrant. It's similar to pot, it's illegal in some places so people are committing a crime, but in an argument about whether the law is just, calling them a criminal doesn't really do anything for the discussion. It's technically correct, but just for the sake of argument, when talking about whether or not a law is just or not, it's a useless thing to clarify I think.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:27 PM
2

Eeeyup. Similar to Quebec wanting to separate from the rest of Canada in order maintain their culture...and take a punch of hydro power land with them, forgetting that using the same logic, all that land should be native
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:23 PM
5

Thank you for doing that and I applaud your chill attitude about it.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 04:30 PM
-3

Using examples of stupid people to prove how stupid a movement is, does not in itself prove the movement is stupid. I do wish these types of people were less frequent though. They want something righteous to happen (everyone is happy and can live where they want) but realistically it's not possible and can cause harm if you just let in mass amounts of people to a country. They (illegal immigrants) may not literally steal jobs but they drive down the wage employers are willing to pay for low skil…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 04:24 PM
2

And the fact that I guess one of the characters is in fact a murderer, should be obvious that they are messed up...the character has to be written that way, but I guess that's not allowed if you attach them to the feminist cause
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:35 PM
1

Yeah, just checking. Don't agree with you on this case, but checking that other point.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 11:12 PM
1

And that sounds good and it should be case by case. She doesn't care so the guy read the social cues well and all is good, if not for the school. Are you honestly saying that if she had said no sex without a condom and he stuck it in and she got the fuck out of there and pressed charges, that wouldn't be assault in your mind? This is what I am trying to find out with your opinion. Cause that's all I'm saying. Getting hot and heavy with someone and during they specifically say no to something, li…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:39 AM
1

Again, not blanket calling it all rape or assault but once again, someone says not to in a very clear way like she described(whether it happened or not), you don't. None of this "teehee, don't try to fuck me" which we are not talking about, or accidental, again which isnt this situation, I'm talking about a straight up "hey, don't do this" and the other person does it. You know it, I know it, quit with the b.s. by responding with "yeah, but one time I was making out with a girl and she starts je…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:20 AM
1

I wouldn't think so. That wasn't this situation at all and you know it. You are doing what the feminists you probably hate do, making every situation a black or white category. Use you judgement and based on her story anyway, she said not to, he did anyway. There are significant number of women who wouldn't care and a significant number who would. Those who would care are being reasonable in pressing charges if they chose to. The other person misread the situation of "no, don't out your dick in …
/r/MensRights21/04/16 07:02 PM
1

Yeah, I agree with that. Should be police only and they would likely have quickly dismissed it.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 06:56 PM
1

Think I'm arguing both. Go ahead, have someone tell you no to sticking your duck in them and you do it. See how that works for you legally and morally.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 06:22 PM
1

I think you can claim assault. I don't need it to be broken down and the fact that they disagree with that moment is fine and makes her not caring about it all the more important BUT, someone says they don't want something and you then do it....if you think at that moment, that is OK, there is something wrong with your thinking about consent....its not ok to do something when someone says no. Some people might be fine with it but in the general sense, don't do it and you should know better, espe…
/r/MensRights21/04/16 06:11 PM
-1

She consented to sex with a condom. That is all she consented to. Consent is not a blanket pass to do whatever the fuck you want to another human being. It's specific. She flat out so no to doing it without a condom. That is the opposite of consent. When a woman says dnt put your dick in me without a condom, don't put your dick in them without a condom. She's not saying saying she doesn't want to have sex with him. She is literally saying she does BUT, not without a condom. A little scary you ar…
/r/MensRights21/04/16 05:55 PM
-1

It can be assault at least. "Don't put your dick in me", "I'm gonna put my dick in you" , "don't put your dick in me" puts dick in her That's assault at least. It might not be drag a person into the bushes while they are screaming no and penetrate them rape but it's at minimum not cool. It might not be an offense worth ruining someone's life and that woman is not going to cry herself to sleep in the shower because he put his dick in her before taking it out and throwing on a condom, but it's ass…
/r/MensRights21/04/16 05:41 PM
-1

Yeah, I agree, she clearly said no. The only part of this that makes it not so bad is that she did want to have sex with him. Whether it was for sti or pregnancy reasons, don't dip it in and go get the condom. Now as to how she feels about it and what should be done, think that should be up to her and not the university.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:49 PM
1

It's going to be white straight women next, them Jewish people and then Chinese, Korean and Japanese to not be allowed to participate in the oppression Olympics.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 06:07 PM
6

Contradicting the truth in her statement within the statement. Skillz. White men don't know what it's like to be under attack, which is to lead to thinking that they cant voice an opinion because why bother making that statement, never mind the fact that "white men" is a fairly non specific racist term. Do the "white men" all have the same religion, ethnic background, level of persecution in their country, economic advantages, legal rights(or treatment by the legal system), citizenship status, e…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 11:34 PM
3

Same reasoning. Just advertise it as keeping men from raping women by segregating them to their own uber.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 11:36 AM
1

While I think that might be true, I think there are a significant number of gay women who were raped, rather then beaten up, as a "take that queer person" move by the type of people that do that kinda shit.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:32 PM
2

What a bold move to take the lead in the oppression olympics
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:28 PM
5

It's not a "worth it" factor, it's a commitment thing IMO. Every relationship reaches a point where you don't give a crap who pays for what, but initially, other than the odd treat it should be split out of respect for each other until peeps agree to be monogamous. Other school of thought is if you invite someone out, you pay. If you both agree to go somewhere, split.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:46 AM
1

Yeah, that was vile. I lost a lot of respect for her(and I guess her fanatical supporters) then, it never recvered. She cried about getting called out for getting certain donations and then people are coming out saying this b.s. no surprise M.A. doesn't support Bernie.....
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:23 PM
1

I wish people would stop using her being a woman as her defining characteristic. She is more a Washington game player then anything. That's all she is. Someone getting elected due mainly because of their membership to a minority is the stupidest thing I've ever heard of. At least with Obama, he seemed like a reasonable candidate, even if waves of people were admitting that they were votng for him because he was black. How you can look at Clinton and think she cares about anything other than gett…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:19 PM
3

And make people less likely to believe legitimate victims
/r/MensRights07/02/16 08:55 AM
2

It is for this discussion. Might be relevant if you were to ask if she would get as much support if she were more attractive but the number if people commenting on her looks in this thread is annoying and muddies the waters
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:51 PM
1

Well that's kinda the point. Something like this is in a way everyone's business because that person could reoffend. That's partly why a lot of women come forward when they generally don't want to, the guilt of not speaking up and being able to possibly prevent future rapes.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:39 PM
6

Yup, thanks for saying that. Gets too hypocritical around here sometimes
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:18 PM
1

The people I know who get violent when they are drunk are the kind of people you can tell will get violent when drunk, usually. Don't blame alcohol imo. I am willing to blame alcohol for peoples addiction weirdly enough, but not how they act while on it. If I acted like a dooshnozzle every time I got drunk, I wouldnt touch the stuff.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 02:15 PM
24

Please don't do these clickbate titles
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:38 AM
4

Exactly. If people think most of this doesn't apply to a lot of the posts here, then you are stuck in a similar bubble some feminists are
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:37 AM
1

Not taking sides, but I think each person is responsible for their own orgasm during sex. The idea that "he/she didn't get me off" is part of the problem. Yes it can help, but you should t need to yield comete control to someone (by having them service you) in order to reach orgasm. You should know your body and what you need
/r/MensRights25/12/15 05:03 PM
10

Would be an interesting study to see how they developed, how they explained pay/benifit gaps between super butch women and the more feminine ones that would get preggers....if they try to get pregnant.....or maybe between tall and short women or blonde and brunette. Really though, I'm sure they will survive fine. Theres way too much literature out there on building that sort of community for them not to.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 06:35 PM
6

I see it more as old school bias as opposed to feminist. While maybe some feminists don't give a crap about violence against men, the fact that the police did nothing is more consistent with traditional male/female roles pre feminism than neo feminist influence.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 05:51 PM
2

Sort of but really all it means is two washrooms will be blocked up by women
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:54 PM
1

Theres a bunch on there that are complete bullshit but get the sentiment and agree with the idea. Theres plenty of privilege experienced by many groups and this victim identification leading to infalibility crap needs to stop. Its at best neutralizing and more then likely completely setting us back social progress wise.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 09:43 AM
1

Its possible a high number of neo cons attached themselves to the movement but come on. Socially liberal and financially cnservative is probably the makeup of most people in mensrights. Most of the major hot topics are exactly that.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:58 AM
-2

Pretty much agree with you. Attack the person claiming to be a feminist, not the idea of feminism. The same arguments "feminsm is what the crazies are spouting because that what we see all the time" can easily be applied to mra's and calling them all red pill stunted growth asshats. Its not getting us anywhere. Just crwating two groups whos obly purpose is to fight the other
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:37 AM
3

Just as well as it did pre-Obama
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:11 PM
0

I dont think she qas saying it wasnt valid
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:53 AM
1

Wow, you are trolling...greys..who talks like tgat to people....maybe the same people you claim to hate. You are the one labeling groups btw...the people don't define everyone who uses the name, thats just basic logic
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:09 AM
1

Right and you are deciding who belongs to a group. Doesn't matter, assuming you are trolling by the way you ended your comment. Discussion over
/r/MensRights01/02/14 05:56 AM
-2

also, all men are rapists, all black people listen to rap music. Stop letting loud voices or examples of a group determine your opinion of everyone who claims to belong to said group. there is no official representative of feminists. There are groups of angry people yelling about stuff they are engry about and in some cases causeing change for better or for worse. Please, argue against ideas, not groups or labels groups claim to own which often dont even exist as a homogeneous entity in reality.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:34 AM
1

yeah, it is, you're right. Hence why I visit this sub. Its hard for a lot of groups who struggle for things. there is definitely resistence out there.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:28 AM
-1

oh, thats what happened. meh, your repsonse here seems kinda trololol but I'll bite. Again, you ignore my points but whatever. Some group claiming the title of feminists claim some stance relating to the point you are triyng to prove and who 100% do not represent any of the feminists I know (I never said there weren't batshit crazy ones out there)...I'll just go by this: the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men Thats all it is to the women …
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:24 AM
-2

This sub is useless now. Its another us against them b.s. whine a thon. Lets pick some enemy we can blame everything on and pigeonhole people who remotely resemble any aspect and give anyone absolute authority over a group when they claim to belong to said group. Every feminist is anti men and every mens right person is a misogynist. ITS A WAR PEOPLE. Fuck logic! Everything us black and white, no time to think about issues, just jump on the side that the loudest wingnuts represent and start comp…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 10:46 AM
-7

They do the same thing that most men do about those issues, nothing. Also, more importantly, they aren't against solving those issues. inactivity against an issue doesn't.mean agreement
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:36 PM
-13

Some feminists have. Every woman I know who considers herself a feminist believes in equal rights.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:12 PM
1

What does stupid people logic have to do directly with mens rights?
/r/MensRights02/01/14 05:46 PM
1

they are worried about both, its just known to affect more women.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:19 AM
27

Men can and do get breast cancer. Woman can't get prostate cancer. Not defending, just saying.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 12:27 PM
2

I think he's needs to stay away from the personal attacks though. Otherwise, pretty solid
/r/MensRights01/12/13 12:24 PM
3

I think you are both a little off, enough so its causing problems. He's attributing women who want half or more or feel entitled to that as feminists. Some feminusts believe that and some non feminists do as well but it has nothing to do with feminists. Your idea of his view on women being weak us the opposite of what he thinks. I think to a degree, you are right about how people perceive some posessions and the idea that a woman or man gets f 'ed because they chose to stay at home to raise kids…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:49 PM
1

Yup
/r/MensRights03/10/13 04:29 AM
1

Just kept to be repeatedly sodomized or something. Both happen, good and bad. Low incone men have always been disposable though
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:18 AM
0

ofcourse not, they were treated fine. having limited responsibilities=being treated awesome
/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:58 PM
0

She wss the face of yhat group protesting at yhat event no matter what labels you gave her or even she gave herself. Shes an angry hateful harpy who represented herself and her views. All conservatives are not the same or bad, all liberals are not the same or bad. The terms don't represent something inherently evil or wrong. Stop trying to make a term being an easy cop out for you to ignore an opinion from someone claiming a feminist tag or focud you energy into blaming them for the lack of equa…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:56 AM
0

The way people talk about the people you identify as the face of feminism won't lead to a solution. Don't ignore the retards but stop fucking applying general all in labels to groups you dont like so any message coming from someone caling themselves a feminist or a mra is ignored because the extremsts have their own ignorant vision of what that means. Nothing gets solved by that b.s. feminism came into existence because woman had limited rights and were treated like shit or the vast majority did…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:42 AM
1

Its nt about being honorable, ots about saying and doing things thst will actuslly lead to solutions rsther then more problems caused by two angry groups spewing verbal b.s. some extreme actions by groups do sometimes lead to results, groupng all feminists together does not
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:28 AM
-3

so basically; everything this group represents and how they treat others rights is so crappy, good thing we got our group that spouts the same b.s. back at them well done. glad we can be adults about equal rights
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:43 PM
1

I think thats what it was about at the start and for a lot of woman that IS what it is about now. Stop trying to make everything black and white and do mass labeling of people so its easier to dismiss a movement or oint of view
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:06 PM
0

its some of them. You are taking all the bad apples and making them poster woman for their movement. Thats like taking all the "stupid bitches, get in the kitchen" mens right guys and saying they are what its about.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:05 PM
3

Perhaps you mean "don't let men's rights be anti-women's rights"? Men's and women's rights are not mutually exclusive. thats a better way to put it.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:03 PM
1

come on...not saying there aren't the elements in the movement like that but you can't get any more misandrist than feminism Geezus
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:58 PM
9

I could only watch so much of that video with her in it. brutal but please don't make men's rights be about anti-feminism
/r/MensRights30/09/13 03:24 PM
5

feminism (being equal rights for women) is no worse then mens rights (being equal rights for men). There are those that distort the basic message and may even have be the majority representing the group. The basic definitions are still good, its people that are shit. I dont think people should look at feminism and say its bad anymore then people should look at mens rights and say the same. Really, people should be arguing for humanism.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:40 AM
2

That texas football thing. The stuff that happened out east in Canada. It happens a significant amount of the time. I've personally never heard mention of feminists calling rape victims names. If it happens, I doubt most rape victims who vome forward endure that.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:47 PM
1

I think its just the result of extremely sexually frustrated men with maybe a bit of backwards culture thrown in (maybe a splash of barely literate annoying 12 year old kids as well). The guys I know who tend to talk like that have fucking horrible home lives wife wise and either never get any from their SO or they don't want to touch them with a ten foot pole (which I wouldn't blame them). Also, trolls, many jsut general hate spewing trolls at anyone about anything who could be an easy target (…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 01:02 AM
2

You're right. Its about feeling safe I guess, not actually being safe. If woman want to go to a place where there are no men, go for it. I think men should have that same right. It might be offensive to me as a non threatening male (in my own opinion of myself) but I don't think people have the right to not be offended. Safe places may have turned into a breeding ground for gender hating type politics. If I had a friend or a sister or someone who was abused in a long term relationship, I'd want …
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:56 AM
1

exactly...although I dont know what you mean by homoarchy. I actually am judging the bankers and politicians, not the system when I say I hate blank. Feminism/Mens rights, its just for equal rights, nothing more. Anything else is a perversion manufactured by extremists with hurt buttholes.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:41 AM
2

There is a culture that seems to not punush rape as much as it should (also the victim getting called slut or whatever after coming forward). Thats the closest I can see to "rape culture" being the case. I think its just as common that there are false accusations of rape but both do exist. Seems like both cases happen at universities quite often. edit: I did upvote you fyi, you are bang on
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:20 AM
1

Being the ex wife, I dont get why she has any right to the body
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:06 AM
1

what it boils down to is if the mother wants to keep the pregnancy going, the father should have the option of opting out financially with no fear of financial obligations down the road. If the father wants to keep the pregnancy going and the woman does not, then its basically tough shit becasue of the logistics (as it should be). Its about as perfect as it can get considering how pregnancy works. good on the blogger for not fitting stereotypes and thinking about everyone's rights.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 11:10 PM
3

Safe places are not about making male feminists not feel like outsiders, they are, ideally, safe places for woman to congregate. The real threat as a result being predatory woman looking to take advantage (same mentality as abusive controlling men). I think its a red flag when anyone is "too" into something. Seems like any hard line person for most causes have been swept up in the movement(or church or support group or boardgame club) and ironically are part of what is damaging it.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 10:48 PM
8

thats what bugs me most about some of the so called feminists, not giving women credit enough to be able to make decisions. Its funny when worlds collide
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:53 PM
1

right, exactly. some people are more likely to be a victim and of a more severe act.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:52 AM
1

I didnt get that from her article as being the main point at all but that does sound stupid to me, you're right.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:52 AM
2

what did i say that was bigotted? I mearly point out that I don't blame people for being cautious, not that I agree with them for feeling that way. Also, per your example by switching out words, in certain neighbourhoods and situations, you'd be stupid not to be cautious in the senario you jut described. There are many areas, as a white person you jsut flat out shouldn't go into unless you want to be harrassed or worse. Anyay, troll response time is over.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:51 AM
0

glad yet another sub has turned into an all for nothing circle jerk if you dont agree with the hardest line. no room for discussion. Absolutes for everyone and every topic because the world is black or white, right or wrong, no gray areas./s
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:46 PM
-1

did you read what I wrote? I stand by what I said about a person not having the right to not be offended. That goes across the board and gives people more freedom thentaking any away (mensrights). Him choosing to do that rally, he wanted to, I dont care, right or wrong, if its done right, might make some women feel less like every man is a rapist however stupid that may or may not be to feel. Doesn't affect mens rights at all.....are you trolling...serioulsy cant tell
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:42 PM
-3

All women are potential victims. Not all men are rapists(or potential rapists which i think is the same thing). I can understad a woman being afraid in any given situation because there are rapists out there waiting for opportunities. I don't think this hurts mens right to be treated fairly. If someone feels scared and wants to jog away, go for it. If the guy behind her felt offended and awkward she was scared of him (or felt the need to apologize which is a strange thing that probably most men …
/r/MensRights29/04/13 07:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter