~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Transgender anti-feminist Blaire White debates feminist Laci Green. It goes just as you would think: Laci Green continuously interrupts Blaire, ignores when she's debunked, spouts off ignorance, attacks MRA's (despite saying she "knows nothing about them"), the usual feminist idiocy.I don't agree with every conclusion but the discussion that takes place is informed. You just backed what they said. If they are still wrong it doesn't matter how well they try and spin their falsehood, it remains false. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/17 10:58 PM |
| 1 | Transgender anti-feminist Blaire White debates feminist Laci Green. It goes just as you would think: Laci Green continuously interrupts Blaire, ignores when she's debunked, spouts off ignorance, attacks MRA's (despite saying she "knows nothing about them"), the usual feminist idiocy.Feminism in philosophy has very smart voices that do not sound like anything that the news throws at you. They craft strong logical essays making clear points about their own flaws. It's opposite day already? | /r/MensRights | 30/03/17 10:56 PM |
| – | Transgender anti-feminist Blaire White debates feminist Laci Green. It goes just as you would think: Laci Green continuously interrupts Blaire, ignores when she's debunked, spouts off ignorance, attacks MRA's (despite saying she "knows nothing about them"), the usual feminist idiocy.the worst representations of their movement Consistently the "worst of their movement" is... The leadership of feminist groups and organizations Feminist academics and teachers Feminist writers, authors, journalists Feminist politicians Feminist activists Feminist media personalities and celebs Feminist lobby/political groups Feminist business leaders Oh and the overwhelming majority of feminists themselves either spout off the same bigoted shit or defend those people. So no, we base feminism/fe… | /r/MensRights | 30/03/17 10:49 PM |
| – | Transgender anti-feminist Blaire White debates feminist Laci Green. It goes just as you would think: Laci Green continuously interrupts Blaire, ignores when she's debunked, spouts off ignorance, attacks MRA's (despite saying she "knows nothing about them"), the usual feminist idiocy.she talks about the harm circumcision does to men Did she blame the Patriarchy and toxic masculinity? Because in all fairness that means nothing then. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/17 10:43 PM |
| – | Transgender anti-feminist Blaire White debates feminist Laci Green. It goes just as you would think: Laci Green continuously interrupts Blaire, ignores when she's debunked, spouts off ignorance, attacks MRA's (despite saying she "knows nothing about them"), the usual feminist idiocy.She automatically believes women who say they are raped Notice she was happy to lie about rape statistics and dismiss facts when her anecdotes were countered but the moment Blaire uses her own anecdote of being raped in relation to anecdotal claims Laci dismisses them. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/17 10:41 PM |
| 36 | Feminist woman photographs & mocks a disabled man on an airplane, and posts his photo on the Internet.I'm going to go out on a limb and say your stepmother may be guilty about something. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 17/10/16 11:05 PM |
| – | California strips away due process rights as Governor signs into law bill that removes statute of limitations for rape claims. Pathetically to "combat" the completely evidence lacking claims against Bill Cosby...which WON'T be affected by the change to law.the law itself also creates a stricter set of rules and evidence needed to declare a rape Who is upvoting this? The bill is exactly the same and the only change is the removal of statute of limitations. Which is extremely bad as any lawyer worth their salt will tell you. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/16 11:43 PM |
| – | Rosie Batty, poster child for domestic violence against women due to her husband killing his son and then himself, praises MensLink (a group that blames boys and tells them to not abuse women, not help those boys) saying her son could've used themRemember, Mattress Girl received the "Award of Courage" from NOW, one of the largest feminist organizations in the world. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/16 12:03 PM |
| 6 | 40% of College Age Women Have Admitted They Meant "Yes" When They Told a Man "No"Are you saying someone would drink tea voluntarily and then regret it?! STOP VICTIM BLAMING! | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 06:56 AM |
| – | 40% of College Age Women Have Admitted They Meant "Yes" When They Told a Man "No"Think of consent like tea: Say someone offers you a cup of tea. While you're drunk. And you take that tea and drink it voluntarily. YOU WERE RAPED BY TEA! Say someone offers you a cup of tea. You drink it. But the next day you don't like the person who you took the tea off of. YOU WERE RAPED BY TEA! Say you are offered a cup of tea. But you don't really want tea. But you don't want to seem rude and you pretend that you do and drink the tea, despite no obligation to do so. YOU WERE RAPED BY TEA! … | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 04:28 AM |
| 6 | 40% of College Age Women Have Admitted They Meant "Yes" When They Told a Man "No"But if you say that sometimes women play games and social interaction isn't clear cut based on literal interpretation of what they say, you're a "misogynist". | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 04:20 AM |
| 2 | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsYes, I know No, you clearly don't. Which is why you replied to me as if I was OP. You're simply ignoring why I was making fun of his use of bold. We can see why. Because you immediately weren't able to defend your idiocy and resorted to bitching about bolding While lying about what OP said. You're a bit dense aren't you, little feminist. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:54 AM |
| – | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsLikely from the SRS hole you crawled out of. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:50 AM |
| 3 | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsBack to SRS, little feminist. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:47 AM |
| 2 | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsREEEEEEEEEEEEEE Not OP, little feminist. From all of these replies you're quite literally the only one ignoring anything. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:46 AM |
| 3 | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsYou're bitching about holding words. Yeah you are, brah. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:44 AM |
| 2 | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsActing like a triggered feminazi over bolding words? Suck it up. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:41 AM |
| – | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsYou need to stop being so mad. So far you've lied about what OP said and are now bitching about a normal Reddit text feature. Get a grip. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:40 AM |
| – | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsWe have words for racism against whites- racism against whites. OP didn't say that. At all. Why would you lie when they even said in their post: "Some black guy coming up to you and calling you a cracker is just plain old racism. It's not reverse racism. But a black guy being allowed to call you racist names while you can't is reverse racism." I mean shit. They used the exact example you gave. You're clearly not reading anything they've written. Reverse-racism is a neologism that is trying to ta… | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:39 AM |
| – | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsBoldening words does not make you right, it makes you look like a prick. Straight to ad hominems eh? Where have I see that before. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:34 AM |
| 2 | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsbut isn't the one most used Got anything to back that up? It's almost exclusively used in what OP states but only ever dismissed with unrelated claims that weren't being used. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:33 AM |
| 2 | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsGreat explanation. It's unnerving that some here will shy away from stuff like this because it makes us look bad. We had the same thing with the Mattress Girl case at the start, where some on this sub were refusing to address the clear false rape accusation because the media was already pushing their narrative. As if his rights didn't matter. If we throw out the fact that reverse-racism is real because feminists are screaming it is, we might as well accept the nonsense that "mansplaining" is som… | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 03:32 AM |
| – | Brock Turner directly threatened with violence and death by armed protesters outside his parents' home for "rape". You might hate him or not want to address this but he has rights and he never committed rape. And given the evidence, the assault claim is still suspect.To those who decry that he "still sexually assaulted her": By party witness accounts and her own sister, she was on the dance floor dancing with him. By party witness accounts and her own sister, she was kissing and grinding with him on the dance floor. By witness accounts at the party, she voluntarily left with him giggling and kissing him from the party. The girl in question denies all of that as "lies" by Brock Turner despite being verified witnesses. Yet she apparently remembers what happene… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 12:40 AM |
| 1 | Brock Turnerfor your own education and so you don't run into trouble with this assumption, I highly advise you to get educated on this. Let me just stop your desperately moronic ignorance right there. Rape does require intent. If you slip and fall on someones dick, they are not magically a rapist because you didn't want to have their dick inside you. The sheer level of complete stupidity from you that you actually are trying to claim otherwise is pathetic. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 02:09 PM |
| 5 | Apparently male athletes get off very easy compared to Hope SoloAnd remember, Ray Rice defended himself from his wife repeatedly abusing and physically attacking him. She originally spat on him and was abusing him according to staff, so everything he did was a response. He pushed her away and then went to the corner of the elevator to get away. He only hit her once she rushed at him trying to hit him in the head a second time. | /r/PussyPass | 30/08/16 02:40 AM |
| 1 | Brock Turneryet he continued. He was fingering her while conscious and consenting, while also heavily wasted, and didn't realize her lying back and enjoying it had progressed to unconsciousess. That's not rape. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 02:08 AM |
| 1 | Brock TurnerListen to the victims letter You mean the letter where she claims to have experienced things that ruined her despite not even knowing about them because she was unconscious? You mean the letter where she dismisses claims that multiple party witnesses and her own sister testified as happening as lied by Turner? heartbreaking And there's the issue. People like you rely on emotional fallacies that defy the known facts while rejecting everything else because "listen and believe!" Which is hilarious … | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 02:05 AM |
| 2 | Brock TurnerDoesn't really check out Strange, she's being praised in every media outlet as a stronk womyn. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 01:10 AM |
| 3 | Brock TurnerI'm stunned by this phenomenon, but actually it matches with his story 100%. It also matches up precisely with what his father and female friend were referring to. It's a common feminist tactic to lie, which is why they've taken a charge of sexual assault (not rape) and claimed he raped her. Then declared his father's statement to be declaring rape as "20 minutes of action". Why would he say such a stupid thing? It's because he didn't. He directly referred to the 20 minutes of consensual action … | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 01:08 AM |
| 2 | Brock TurnerWhy don't you tell me why the difference matters? Because she was black out drunk when she left the party with him voluntarily and was extremely enthusiastic about it. I guess he also kidnapped her as well, eh? | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 01:02 AM |
| 1 | Brock Turnerif she was blackout drunk, then she can't give consent Blackout drunk has absolutely no relation to being able to consent. People can be blackout drunk while walking around and appearing completely sober. Being blackout drunk is not the same as unconscious. She was "blackout drunk" when she was leaving the party with him. If she consented to fingering and then passed out halfway through while he had no idea that her laying back with her eyes closed was now different than before when she wasn't u… | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 01:00 AM |
| 4 | Brock TurnerHer "victim" letter also was hilariously absurd. She described things she was not even conscious for and yet dismissed the very idea she left with him despite her own sister and guests testifying she kissed, grinded on and left the party with him. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 12:56 AM |
| 3 | Brock TurnerLiterally nothing you wrote relates in any way to this why would he do any of those things if he's drunkenly fingering a girl who consented and he didn't realize she had fallen asleep? Especially as she was apparently moving and making soft sounds as the witnesses saw and heard, which would be indistinguishable from her previous moaning, especially while he was that drunk. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 12:54 AM |
| 3 | Brock Turnerhe ran lol. It's amazing how you SJW's keep shifting the goal posts. Oh, your "evidence" turns out to be erroneous? "But he ran lol!" If you're not making a run for it when two randoms shout at you and then try and immediately rush you in a park in the middle of the night while drunk, there's something wrong with you. And hopefully it'll get you beaten up and robbed because of your stupidity. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 12:50 AM |
| 4 | Brock TurnerThe most damning evidence is the eyewitness accounts The eyewitness accounts of...what? That she was dancing and grinding with him at the party? Witnessed by most of the party and her own sister? That she was kissing him at the party? Witnessed by most of the party and her own sister? That she voluntarily left with him from the party, giggling and touching him? Witnessed by most of the party? No? Oh, you mean two guys who shouted and then rushed at him immediately because they saw some guy grind… | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 12:46 AM |
| 3 | Brock TurnerNo, they're gonna think you're a rapist of some kind Amazing that you managed to immediately find the guy a rapist because he admitted to sex while both of them are drunk. Is the girl he's with not also a rapist for drunken sex? | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 12:42 AM |
| 2 | Brock TurnerIf anything, in women, it relaxes them and further draws them into unconsciousness. So what would start off as moaning and passive enjoyment quickly turns into falling asleep or going unconscious. It doesn't tend to happen with men because they tend to require, but not need, being conscious (hence the term "Whiskey Dick"). Which is why the same passing out tends to occurr for men with blowjobs while very drunk, as it requires no effort. Same thing happens for extremely relaxing things like massa… | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/16 12:40 AM |
| – | We made number 4, guys!They blame Gamergate for a bomb threat that "happened" before Gamergate even existed. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/16 12:59 AM |
| – | College Humor dismisses the idea of false rape claimsActually an extremely perfect example. One of the worlds largest feminist organizations, NOW, gave her an award at an awards show. Massive media press praise. Awards. That by itself flat out refutes this bullshit even if more didn't. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/16 10:20 AM |
| – | Amber heard being caught by Depp trying to set him up trends on YouTube.She's going after Elon Musk now. She was flirting and hanging around with him immediately after she filed for divorce. Straight for a billionaire. Hey, if he's stupid enough to do it immediately after such a dodgy marriage/divorce (even if he believes her) then nothing you can do. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/16 02:39 AM |
| 1 | Amber heard being caught by Depp trying to set him up trends on YouTube.I've slammed a door before and nearly punched a wall when my psychotic ex was getting angry at me because I found out she was cheating. Apparently wanting to punch someone in the face over their abuse but refraining despite a hugely soul crushing mind fuck and extreme stress makes you abusive. Not punching someone in the face who deserved it is abuse now. Feminists are fucking insane. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/16 02:34 AM |
| – | Amber heard being caught by Depp trying to set him up trends on YouTube.He brings up what she did that morning and she goes "why nothing happened this morning dear, especially not an argument". Suddenly he's freakin' shocked and furious she would say that and calls her out on crazy behavior. She's flat out gaslighting him. She had absolutely no reason to say "there was no argument that morning" when Depp didn't even remotely mention an argument. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/16 02:31 AM |
| – | Bill Cosby now faces [60] allegations of rape and sexual abuse years after the claim. And yet not a single one of the claims has evidence proving it. We are at Satanic Ritual Abuse level of hysteria, can we really afford to ignore his due process just because we think he's an asshole/creepy?There has never, ever been a case in which 60 unrelated people have accused an individual of the same type of crime over a period of years, and in different places, and then it all turned out to be bullshit. 60 Unrelated witnesses testified on completely false claims, many of which were physically impossible 41 Unrelated witnesses testified on completely false claims, many of which were physically impossible Over 20 women accused Jian Ghomeshi of rape/assault and all were shown to be liars But i… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 01:09 PM |
| – | Bill Cosby now faces [60] allegations of rape and sexual abuse years after the claim. And yet not a single one of the claims has evidence proving it. We are at Satanic Ritual Abuse level of hysteria, can we really afford to ignore his due process just because we think he's an asshole/creepy?don't need any money It's sad you think money is required (even more so that you think they haven't been given a lot of money for their stories from media outlets) for false rape accusations. Highly unlikely No, it's increasingly more likely the more of these women come out. That's what repeated studies show when it comes to high profile cases against politicians and sports personalities. The more people come out with individual, evidence lacking claims, the less likely they are to be true. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 12:51 PM |
| – | Bill Cosby now faces [60] allegations of rape and sexual abuse years after the claim. And yet not a single one of the claims has evidence proving it. We are at Satanic Ritual Abuse level of hysteria, can we really afford to ignore his due process just because we think he's an asshole/creepy?you don't speak for this sub No, you don't speak for this sub. Mens rights applies to all men whether you like them or not, as protecting their rights protects all of our rights. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 12:49 PM |
| – | Bill Cosby now faces [60] allegations of rape and sexual abuse years after the claim. And yet not a single one of the claims has evidence proving it. We are at Satanic Ritual Abuse level of hysteria, can we really afford to ignore his due process just because we think he's an asshole/creepy?It says verbatim "did not tell the victim the true identity of the pills" Which, as was just specifically explained to you, was because she had asked for Qualudes. If you get drugs for someone after they ask for them, you don't need to explain what those drugs are. It has already been assumed. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 12:47 PM |
| – | Bill Cosby now faces [60] allegations of rape and sexual abuse years after the claim. And yet not a single one of the claims has evidence proving it. We are at Satanic Ritual Abuse level of hysteria, can we really afford to ignore his due process just because we think he's an asshole/creepy?Sorry, again, you personally not liking someone doesn't magically mean they shouldn't be allowed rights. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 12:06 AM |
| – | Bill Cosby now faces [60] allegations of rape and sexual abuse years after the claim. And yet not a single one of the claims has evidence proving it. We are at Satanic Ritual Abuse level of hysteria, can we really afford to ignore his due process just because we think he's an asshole/creepy?he never disclosed the true identity of the pills No, he stated he didn't directly specify the pills in a situation where the pills were already assumed. That absurd spin is as bad as the claim he "admitted to rape". When someone asks you for reactional drugs and you give them to them, it's not common to specifically describe the chemical makeup of them. When someone asks for Qualudes and you give them Qualudes, you don't need to specify that the recreational drug they asked for is what they ask… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 12:03 AM |
| 12 | Bill Cosby now faces [60] allegations of rape and sexual abuse years after the claim. And yet not a single one of the claims has evidence proving it. We are at Satanic Ritual Abuse level of hysteria, can we really afford to ignore his due process just because we think he's an asshole/creepy?Literally the most prolific criminal in the United States during the 70's if these claims were true. Made all the more hilarious by the claim that a black man was raping scores of white women during one of the most turbulent racist times in the US and was doing so in high traffic areas repeatedly and not a single one of them has any evidence. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/16 01:43 PM |
| – | Bill Cosby now faces [60] allegations of rape and sexual abuse years after the claim. And yet not a single one of the claims has evidence proving it. We are at Satanic Ritual Abuse level of hysteria, can we really afford to ignore his due process just because we think he's an asshole/creepy?The chances that all these women are lying are incredibly small. No, the more evidence lacking accusations in a high profile case or against a high profile person the more likely they are to be false. Not the other way 'round. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/16 01:28 PM |
| – | Bill Cosby now faces [60] allegations of rape and sexual abuse years after the claim. And yet not a single one of the claims has evidence proving it. We are at Satanic Ritual Abuse level of hysteria, can we really afford to ignore his due process just because we think he's an asshole/creepy?You don't speak for us. Mens rights is for all men, not just ones you don't like. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/16 01:26 PM |
| 1 | Christie Blatchford: Judge’s florid ruling seems an attempt to blow up so-called ‘rape myths’It's disturbing the few (ex) friends I've had that declared they were rape victims because they just laid there and pretended to like it. Oh, you were flirting and kissing but then didn't want to go any further? Perhaps don't fucking think the guy is psychic and knows about your (which is now also questionable) "abuse" past and then lie there acting like you're consenting. Because guess fucking what, that means you CONSENTED and he ISN'T rapist because as far as you showed him he was having cons… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/16 01:10 AM |
| 2 | Christie Blatchford: Judge’s florid ruling seems an attempt to blow up so-called ‘rape myths’A judge blatantly breaks due process and the law despite evidence refuting the woman's claim...but that's okay because "feminism". A judge asks legally required questions regarding what happened during the alleged rape while attempting to ensure the man is found guilty and he gets razed by feminists for daring to do his job and put up for review. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/16 01:04 AM |
| 16 | Saw this on a train, What about the 62% of homeless men?I'd say that it's closer to 80-90% of homeless are men. It's pathetic they're doing shit like that when those women overwhelmingly aren't homeless (likely domestic violence situation) and women do not even remotely have to go through the same hurdles to receive official homelessness support that men do. And while men's homeless shelters are unisex, domestic violence victims get to take up needed space for men when their women only shelters are full. Including the women only homeless shelters. Ye… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/16 07:06 AM |
| -1 | Men-Only Divorce Attorney Says He's Crusading for Men's Trampled RightsAnd a lot of people who are really adamant you know they do anal. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/16 06:59 AM |
| 1 | Cheerleader claims domestic abuse, cellphone video taken by boyfriend shows her as the aggressorWhen you take away any accountability for someone based on their sex, mysteriously it both encourages and supports abuse by that sex. WHO COULD'VE PREDICTED THIS!!?? | /r/MensRights | 11/07/16 01:05 AM |
| 2 | Female domestic violence victims being punished for acting in self defence, say advocates - only a problem when it happens to womenThis same media outlet is also praising a new law Australians want to push through that would allow domestic violence victims to break their lease without penalty in the case of having to flee domestic violence (something I agree with). Problem is that it only applies to women. Now how the fuck does that work? It doesn't matter about any of this bullshit feminist "but it happens to women woooorse!", there is absolutely no fucking reason for that law not to be gender neutral. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/16 12:59 AM |
| 1 | Big Red (Chanty Binx) is BACK! CityNews desperately tries to spin her as the victim of the Toronto Warren Farrel protests, blatantly lies about her staying out of the spotlight (she's had 2 major public freakout protests since) and blames MRA'sI would've posted the actual news clip but could find it anywhere on YouTube. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/16 12:37 AM |
| 5 | Big Red (Chanty Binx) is BACK! CityNews desperately tries to spin her as the victim of the Toronto Warren Farrel protests, blatantly lies about her staying out of the spotlight (she's had 2 major public freakout protests since) and blames MRA'sHeads up. Looks like every thread talking about this is being brigaded. | /r/MensRights | 03/07/16 04:13 AM |
| 2 | Defamation lawsuit against Rolling Stone by fraternity members is dismissedthe boys weren't named Specific boys do not have to be named for the fraternity to seek damages. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/16 01:43 AM |
| 1 | 'Mattress Girl', Emma Sulkowicz, just received the 'Woman of Courage' award from the National Organization for Women (the world's largest feminist organization) over her false rape accusation and harassment of another studentWhy is this being immediately removed without notification? | /r/PussyPass | 27/06/16 11:36 AM |
| 19 | Emma Sulkowicz receives woman of courage awardShe falsely accused a student of rape because he didn't want to start a relationship with her after hooking up a few times. She proceeded to make it a national case, in which damn near all mainstream media praised her because (after she dropped the case when police dared to ask she come in for questioning) the University managed to find him not guilty even in their kangaroo court, so she carried a mattress around school as an art project, proceeded to harass and slander this student and effectiv… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/16 04:42 AM |
| 18 | Emma Sulkowicz receives woman of courage awardShe does. But she probably believes it's "starting a conversation". | /r/MensRights | 27/06/16 04:36 AM |
| 5 | [Feminists eat their own] Feminists are now attacking the White Ribbon campaign because...a football commentator said a joke about a woman and other absurd reasonsThe White Ribbon Foundation is a straight up scam This is the same for any feminist group, especially anti-domestic violence organizations. Their reasoning for doing so however is blatantly moronic. An Australian football commentator joked about another hosts joke and said he would pay money to charity to see the new shows host try and hold her head under ice water (which he himself had just done) and that he'd pay extra to see someone else do it. This was declared a "threat of domestic violence… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/16 03:28 AM |
| 1 | Ex-wife 'tried to kill her ex-husband with a pepper grinder before stabbing him with a carving knife and attempting to pull out his intestines after they had sex' - says she defended herself after rape"Put the kettle on, luv, this is gonna be a right inconvenience." | /r/MensRights | 24/06/16 01:55 AM |
| 1 | Ex-wife 'tried to kill her ex-husband with a pepper grinder before stabbing him with a carving knife and attempting to pull out his intestines after they had sex' - says she defended herself after rape"I held him down and pulled out his intestines...in self-defense" Maybe this is why we don't see many female serial killers? Because they are found innocent due to absurd claims of self-defense. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/16 01:54 AM |
| 4 | Feminist believes that men raped by women are privileged."Rape culture was coined by feminists in the 70's" It's amazing that they still try this bullshit when 'rape culture' was coined much earlier and to describe rape of men in prison. Yet male rape being discussed in relation to it is considered "derailing" and their rape a privilege. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/16 11:07 PM |
| 3 | Stay classy, Jezebel: "Just remember that every murder of a woman by her intimate partner is somehow a completely isolated incident, just like every mass shooting."Dontcha know? Every case of domestic violence completely situated to that specific situation and person is actually an organized mass attack on women by the Patriarchy. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/16 03:28 AM |
| 1 | Is the backlash against the Stanford swimmer fair?If it's anything like the recent case where a woman gave a blowjob to a passed out male student and then "revoked her consent" for what she was doing to him, you could've raped her. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/16 08:36 AM |
| 1 | Is the backlash against the Stanford swimmer fair?She literally has nothing to remember from it. Literally. She doesn't even remember that she danced, kissed, grinded on and then voluntarily left with him from the party, something all witnesses confirmed including her own sister. Stop with your "PTSD trigger" tier feminist bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/16 08:10 AM |
| 1 | The Vagueness of Consent: A discussion inspired by Brock Turner's story.I would say that it becomes obvious that a person is unconscious after only a few seconds. Oh fuck right off. He was also just as incredibly intoxicated. They were both lying there grinding and groping. At that level of incoherence it's an absolutely absurd claim to make that he should've immediately known she was passed out, especially if she was still moaning with her eyes closed the entire time. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/16 01:56 PM |
| -8 | The Vagueness of Consent: A discussion inspired by Brock Turner's story.Don't do things to people when they are incoherently drunk. So despite the fact he was severely intoxicated and couldn't even be questioned by police till the next day because of how incoherent he was, you think that somehow he should have the same cognitive ability he has while sober while he's completely drunk? IMHO it was rape before during and after. Oh, so she's was raping him? Since he was also completely wasted? Running when he was caught seems to imply intent Wow. Just wow. A drunken guy… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/16 01:38 PM |
| 3 | Woman who raped sixth-grade male student won't go to prison; will be on house arrest for 6 monthsThe judge doesn't have the power to do the former The judges role is to provide judgement in accordance with the law based on the crime. If they are to be sentenced to prison it is not the judges call to remove their sentence because prison might be shit for them. The prisoner can approach the state to provide adequate healthcare. No sentencing judge should be deciding anything regarding conditions well beyond the required sentence. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/16 06:33 AM |
| 5 | Woman who raped sixth-grade male student won't go to prison; will be on house arrest for 6 monthsNo, sorry, "inadequate" healthcare (which is very debatable this woman "needs") in prison means increased funding for that prison, not fucking let the child rapist go free. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/16 04:07 AM |
| 7 | Woman who raped sixth-grade male student won't go to prison; will be on house arrest for 6 monthsWoman who raped sixth-grade male student won't go to prison; will be on house arrest for 6 months But remember, Brock Turner proves rape culture, 1-in-3 women are raped and that there's male privilege. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/16 04:05 AM |
| 2 | Gold Digger Amber Heard Sues Doug Stanhope for Calling Her a Gold Digger.I thought it hadn't gone through the courts? That's not how evidence works. The police have refuted her claim. And that's just official evidence, we've already seen her bullshit shut down by photos where she keeps being caught out without makeup. Didn't the judge grant her an AVO? Literally any woman will be issued one automatically. It's a short term restraining order, it means absolutely nothing and requires absolutely no evidence to obtain. | /r/MensRights | 04/06/16 08:37 AM |
| 6 | Amber Heard Sues Comedian for Defamation Over Claim She's Blackmailing Johnny Depp; Claims She Will Give 100% of Proceeds to Domestic Violence CharityDV charities spend their money on supporting victims Aahahahahahahaha... very little goes to activities that endanger you. AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! comes out of your taxes As these "charities" get government funding, yes they fucking do come out of peoples taxes. | /r/MensRights | 04/06/16 08:34 AM |
| 13 | Despite mounting evidence against Amber Heard and with her "bruise" magically reappearing and moving again, Washington Post declares Johnny Depp guilty and chastises society for not immediately attacking and dropping such a "dangerous male"She went to a private meeting with lawyers and didn't have any bruises or marks. And you can clearly see she's not wearing makeup in this photo either. Yet she does here for this public court appearance and it's moved since her original social media pictures she took "right after the incident". Which is also odd, as immediately after the incident police observed she had no markings or bruises and that her house wasn't trashed as she claimed, showing flat out her pictures of bruises and the broke… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/16 11:05 AM |
| 2 | My local paper wanted to inform us all about an epidemic affecting women, with this graphic.There was a campaign recently in Australia just for that. There was an "epidemic" of women being homeless and they need funding for shelters. ...this is despite a growing male homelessness issue because new laws made it so homeless shelters, which are unisex, have to take in women from domestic violence shelters first when they get crowded. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/16 11:28 PM |
| 11 | Guilty until proven innocent. New Johnny Depp movie bombs amongst calls to boycott due to ALLEGED domestic violenceLook, I'm in complete and absolute agreement that this bullshit boycott is pathetic and a disgusting display given innocent until proven guilty and the overwhelming evidence that Amber Heard lied, but this film was going to bomb regardless. I do not think that any boycott is going to or did anything, given that this film bombed before allegations took hold. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/16 05:28 AM |
| 1 | #ProtectTheMeme - Jess Phillips MP claims she has received 5000 abusive tweets which state people DON'T WANT TO and WOULDN'T RAPE HER. Memetic Feminism's Implosion Continues.calling someone too ugly to rape is still abusive No, it's not. Saying you don't want to have sex with someone is not any more abuse than when women say it to men. It appears that Jess Phillips just can't accept that "no" means NO. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/16 03:37 AM |
| 2 | CANADIAN GOVERNMENT naming and shaming "deadbeat" dads (incl. photos) on public forum!we cant advocate any kind of DDoS attacks You heard the man, nobody post this on /pol/ because nobody wants to DDoS this. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/16 12:31 AM |
| 39 | feminists blaming Men for being childless... what a surpriseIf they put on a brave face, how can they be attention seeking perpetual victims? | /r/MensRights | 01/06/16 12:27 AM |
| 25 | Feminist victim fabricated her attacker to win sympathy from boy: New evidence "clearly demonstrates that Jackie is, in fact, Haven Monahan."The judge has already confirmed her name is Jackie Coakley, yet they repeatedly leave that out of the article. Even a proven false rape accuser gets a free pass while her fucking pseudonym doesn't. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/16 12:23 AM |
| 3 | Amber Heard's, who claims Johnny Depp violently abused her, "cut and bruised" face MYSTERIOUSLY completely HEALED as she is seen laughing and smiling leaving her lawyers officeYou can only do so much with eyeliner though. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/16 11:42 AM |
| 8 | I'd like to thank the feminists at EverydayFeminism for continuing to spew the same vitriol against men and the Men's Rights Movement that is turning away people from feminism in droves. Bonus points for STILL being stupid enough to not realize "#Meninism" is a direct parody of feminist sexism.Love the shift from their constant mantra of "feminism means equality for women" to just now "equality for all" while feminism remains fundamentally and actionably opposed to equality at every turn. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/16 08:45 AM |
| 4 | Brainlabs, a mathematics, technology and analytics company in the UK, gives its female employees a 8.6% payrise no matter position, skill, work hours or ability to "combat the pay gap". Then justify it be rejecting math and statistics and claiming the refutation of it is "normalization" and a "con"That's true. Math and statistics refuting their preconceived false notion of a pay gap isn't magically invalidated because they scream "it's a con!". The pay gap is still refuted. The only con here is that they met basic facts and then denied them by people could twist statistics to refute them while they themselves are actually twisting statistics to back their original claim. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/16 08:40 AM |
| 14 | I'd like to thank the feminists at EverydayFeminism for continuing to spew the same vitriol against men and the Men's Rights Movement that is turning away people from feminism in droves. Bonus points for STILL being stupid enough to not realize "#Meninism" is a direct parody of feminist sexism.Feminism includes men's rights Buahahahahaha, oh Jesus. Just going straight for the blatant lies, eh? Even after the entire article is a direct attack on men's rights as even a thing? Lets have a look at this feminists reasons we need feminism and not men's rights... 1) Gender quotas aren't giving women jobs they don't deserve! Because they are oppressed, so by default they deserve them because women aren't choosing to go into the fields they claim they're excluded from. Also mah wage gap myth. … | /r/MensRights | 31/05/16 07:21 AM |
| 4 | Brainlabs, a mathematics, technology and analytics company in the UK, gives its female employees a 8.6% payrise no matter position, skill, work hours or ability to "combat the pay gap". Then justify it be rejecting math and statistics and claiming the refutation of it is "normalization" and a "con"They clearly don't. As evident by the fact they attempt to declare evidence and the very statistics they're coming up with the pay gap myth refuting them to be "normalization" and a "con". | /r/MensRights | 31/05/16 04:06 AM |
| 3 | Amber Heard's, who claims Johnny Depp violently abused her, "cut and bruised" face MYSTERIOUSLY completely HEALED as she is seen laughing and smiling leaving her lawyers officeRight, because you can always tell with 100% certainty when someone is wearing make-up Yes. Yes you can. As there are literally hundreds of photographs, you know since she's a celebrity, of her with makeup and without makeup. This is one of the photos that looks exactly like all the other photos of her without makeup. Trying to play this off as if she's some random person and people are coming up with this shit out of the blue because "how could we know" is pretty damn ridiculous given the sheer… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/16 03:31 AM |
| 2 | Amber Heard's, who claims Johnny Depp violently abused her, "cut and bruised" face MYSTERIOUSLY completely HEALED as she is seen laughing and smiling leaving her lawyers officeYou're doing "wat" instead of "what?" now? How far the mighty bots have fallen. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/16 02:40 AM |
| 1 | Amber Heard's, who claims Johnny Depp violently abused her, "cut and bruised" face MYSTERIOUSLY completely HEALED as she is seen laughing and smiling leaving her lawyers officet's also possible that her healed face is a result of caking on make-up. Apart from where she isn't wearing makeup in these photos. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/16 02:39 AM |
| 9 | Amber Heard's, who claims Johnny Depp violently abused her, "cut and bruised" face MYSTERIOUSLY completely HEALED as she is seen laughing and smiling leaving her lawyers officeOh, tell me more about all of the evidence that you know about personally from what the media is telling you She filed for divorce She demanded spousal support She was denied spousal support Mysteriously next day she is "violently abused". Whoops, police show up. Find she has no cuts or marks of any kind on her face. Find her house is not trashed as she later claims. That Johnny Depp isn't there, which as she claims he didn't come back shows it didn't occur later. Mysteriously comes out with pho… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/16 01:14 AM |
| 12 | Amber Heard's, who claims Johnny Depp violently abused her, "cut and bruised" face MYSTERIOUSLY completely HEALED as she is seen laughing and smiling leaving her lawyers officeOh, that tired old tactic? We heard that bullshit when Mattress Girls texts got released as well. No, all the evidence and incredibly ridiculous timing is what shows she's a conniving evil bitch. That she's laughing about it all is simply showing she doesn't even care to hide that fact. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/16 12:30 AM |
| -1 | Disgusting display of sexism in military. Soldiers immediately grab and throw off male soldier besting a female soldier in pugil stick competition twist. While allowing even a male on male fist fight to continue.You seem to have some serious issues So this is the best bullshit you can come up with after the video refutes your nonsense? It's amazing how this seems to be the go-to fallacy whenever someone gets shut down. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/16 10:44 PM |
| 0 | Disgusting display of sexism in military. Soldiers immediately grab and throw off male soldier besting a female soldier in pugil stick competition twist. While allowing even a male on male fist fight to continue.She was down and Fuck off. They immediately grab and try and throw him off the moment he initially takes her down. And then again in the second round when he wasn't "about to beat the shit out of her". That you're trying to defend this bullshit when the entire rest of the video has WORSE than that with the male soldiers and the referee and other marines are fucking allowing it to continue, to the point they allow a fucking fist fight to continue for a short while is pathetic. There is absolutely… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/16 02:37 PM |
| 2 | [Feminist logic] The Australian national womens soccer team losing to under 15 high school boys soccer team 7-0 is now apparently PROOF that the womens team should be paid the same as the mensInstructions unclear. Played Hockey. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/16 12:38 AM |
| 2 | [Feminist logic] The Australian national womens soccer team losing to under 15 high school boys soccer team 7-0 is now apparently PROOF that the womens team should be paid the same as the mensThat would actually be a hilarious shirt design. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/16 12:37 AM |
| 0 | Wife of Johnny Depp goes after his 400 million dollars wealth and she hits him hard when he's sad and down: two days after his mother's deathbut she also could be a victim of domestic violence too No, her claims have absolutely no evidence, police found she had no damage to her face after the alleged attack and she had a photo taken the day after her "assault" that showed her smiling and unbruised/harmed. She lied. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/16 05:31 AM |
| 7 | California officials discover that Amber Heard domestic abuse claims are false and unreal. I wonder why she goes making domestic violence false claims against Johnny Depp? Yes, rhetorical question of course, we all know she wants to grab as much as she can from his 400 million dollars wealthHeads up. SRS is vote brigading the threads mentioning this. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/16 05:19 AM |
| 0 | Does anyone know what actual evidence was presented at trial that found Sam Ukwuachu, Baylor University footballer who was accused of rape, guilty? I can't seem to actually find why exactly he's guilty, only that he was found guilty.I think the odd part was that his lawyers asked for a retrial and proved to the judge that the prosecution had openly ranted at his defense lawyers in court with shit like "he's clearly guilty, stop defending him!" in full view and hearing of the jury. That, by code, is not allowed and requires a retrial. The judge affirmed that it happened but said it didn't matter so he wasn't getting a retrial. They proved he at the very minimum required a retrial but the judge refused it? After the prosecuti… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/16 12:33 AM |
| 0 | Does anyone know what actual evidence was presented at trial that found Sam Ukwuachu, Baylor University footballer who was accused of rape, guilty? I can't seem to actually find why exactly he's guilty, only that he was found guilty.I heard his alibi was coerced to testify? Didn't he repeatedly deny it and then the police threatened him and put him on home detention, despite having no right to do so, to force him to testify against the guy? | /r/MensRights | 28/05/16 12:29 AM |
| 3 | Does anyone know what actual evidence was presented at trial that found Sam Ukwuachu, Baylor University footballer who was accused of rape, guilty? I can't seem to actually find why exactly he's guilty, only that he was found guilty.Do you doubt his guilt? Tone down your feminist bullshit there, buddy. OP asked what the evidence was. Asking for evidence isn't "hurr durr doubt his guilt!". What the fuck do you think due process is? | /r/MensRights | 28/05/16 12:28 AM |
| 8 | Feminists managed to spout off damn near every lie about "men keeping women down" in this Marvel comic while simultaneously dismissing the massive amount of female superheroesIt's just levels of bullshit. They throw the refuted pay gap myth in there, the hilarious claim that she is being forced to take cooking class because she's a woman and that showing off her science project in an unrelated class is somehow oppression, then not only ignoring the fuckloads of other female super heroes but then proclaiming it still sucks for women somehow. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/16 01:09 AM |
| 1 | Amber Heard just initiated divorce proceedings against Johnny Depp. And despite already personally owning millions, being both financially independent and still having a film career, is demanding SPOUSAL SUPPORT despite only being married for 15 MONTHS.Everything you just said would be classified as "bullying" or "harassment". You even "threatened" me to leave. By your logic you should be locked up for hate speech. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/16 11:42 PM |
| 0 | Amber Heard just initiated divorce proceedings against Johnny Depp. And despite already personally owning millions, being both financially independent and still having a film career, is demanding SPOUSAL SUPPORT despite only being married for 15 MONTHS.There are exceptions for hate speech No there shouldn't be. "Hate speech" laws have absolutely no use outside of criminalizing free speech. Actual incitement to violence is already covered under law and requires actual intent, not just words. The only thing "hate speech" laws have done is allow political attacks on people to silence free speech. As we see with the guy who was arrested for Tweeting in reply to a woman on a public social medium. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/16 11:09 PM |
| 1 | Amber Heard just initiated divorce proceedings against Johnny Depp. And despite already personally owning millions, being both financially independent and still having a film career, is demanding SPOUSAL SUPPORT despite only being married for 15 MONTHS.For example, "Let's gas all the Jews." Yes, that should be free speech. Do you fucking understand how free speech works? | /r/MensRights | 26/05/16 10:32 PM |
| 7 | Amber Heard just initiated divorce proceedings against Johnny Depp. And despite already personally owning millions, being both financially independent and still having a film career, is demanding SPOUSAL SUPPORT despite only being married for 15 MONTHS.Hoping that too. Especially since she's initiated divorce in a cash grab just after his mother died, so there's less chance he'll just let it go. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/16 10:31 PM |
| 13 | Amber Heard just initiated divorce proceedings against Johnny Depp. And despite already personally owning millions, being both financially independent and still having a film career, is demanding SPOUSAL SUPPORT despite only being married for 15 MONTHS.Alimony should be completely removed. But there should be no fucking reason that existing alimony is to "maintain a lifestyle". If there's going to be this sexist bullshit spousal support, it needs to be a sliding scale up to complete full time minimum wage. You want to break up with Joe Smoe? You get what he can afford so he can still live a full time minimum wage. You want to break up with a billionaire after living in a mansion for a few years as a young model? You get minimum fucking wage. I… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/16 10:30 PM |
| 3 | Amber Heard just initiated divorce proceedings against Johnny Depp. And despite already personally owning millions, being both financially independent and still having a film career, is demanding SPOUSAL SUPPORT despite only being married for 15 MONTHS.So, what? She was with him for a long time. Uh, no she wasn't. Even remotely. Nor would it in any way justify it if she was. There is no way to know how much she supported his career Aaaahahahahahahahahahaahhaahhaahhaahhahaha! Oh fucking jesus. That's hilarious. and cut-down on her's in the meantime. Marrying her increased her career opportunities. But love that out of both of those it's somehow automatically the man both gaining from the marriage and holding her back automatically because he's … | /r/MensRights | 26/05/16 10:26 PM |
| 7 | Deluded men's rights activists are conspiracy nutjobs – don't believe a word they sayNo True Scotsman requires that Red Pillers call themselves MRA's. That's the minimum standard. These same feminist morons will scream "No True Feminist" with the actions of the largest feminist organizations in the world but declare people who blatantly state they are not MRA's to be "no true scotsman durr". | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 10:30 PM |
| 1 | Deluded men's rights activists are conspiracy nutjobs – don't believe a word they sayARCHIVE THIS SHIT: http://archive.is/zr5Uk Stop giving these piece of shit slanderers the clicks. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 10:25 PM |
| 1 | Huffington Post tries to turn a story about an elderly man mercy killing his wife (who had asked to die), then giving up to police, due to her extreme pain and being unable to pay for medication anymore...into an incident of misogynistic domestic violence and proof the media hates women.Multiple other articles that came out about this reported that she had asked him to kill her. Even Huffington Post couldn't leave that out and took her blatantly saying she "wanted to die" and was still dismissing the accounts she asked him to kill her. But that's not the issue. There was not a "bad precedent", he was arrested and is going to go to prison. Nothing he did was legal, so even a lenient judge will still relunctently give him a short sentence. All the evidence backed his claimed moti… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 10:16 PM |
| 1 | What is the "Well, actually" joke even supposed to be mocking?And it's the same situation with other phrases like "not all men". The #YesAllWomen and mocking #NotAllMen was the most god damned absurd thing. #YesAllWomen is factually false. #NotAllMen is factually true. Yet they raged the opposite. These people are insane. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 10:36 AM |
| 8 | (x-post from r/korea) Woman holds up sign advocating peace between the sexes, gets assaulted by feminists.Honestly, a feminist movement here isn't the worst thing. Yeah, they said that for India. Now it's getting all the shit of feminism with no actual help for women, with the bonus of now applying and lobbying for anti-male laws and discrimination. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 07:21 AM |
| 0 | (x-post from r/korea) Woman holds up sign advocating peace between the sexes, gets assaulted by feminists.It's actually really pathetic you're trying to equate feminism with women to dismiss this after a feminist attacked a non-feminist woman. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 07:20 AM |
| -1 | (x-post from r/korea) Woman holds up sign advocating peace between the sexes, gets assaulted by feminists.There was a murder in Gangnam Gangham style? | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 07:18 AM |
| 11 | What is the "Well, actually" joke even supposed to be mocking?They have this moronic idea that somehow their ignorance is validated because someone corrects them. Worst still is that most of the time it requires the idea that a man explaining something to a female feminist to be proof they are sexist and trying to silence women to be inherent. So not only do they think that "calling out" something before it happens somehow invalidates what is said but in most cases they don't even call it out, they are delusional enough to think that it's inherently called… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 07:07 AM |
| 4 | Minecraft billionaire 'Notch' just shut down feminists about the blatantly sexist word that is "mansplaining"Everything feminists claim is a product of the "Patriarchy" is done by feminists, promoted by feminism or lobbied for by feminist organizations. The only conclusion you can draw from this is that Feminism IS the Patriarchy. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 06:53 AM |
| 5 | Minecraft billionaire 'Notch' just shut down feminists about the blatantly sexist word that is "mansplaining"He was a normal lower class nerd before he worked his ass off to be a billionaire. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 04:14 AM |
| 8 | Minecraft billionaire 'Notch' just shut down feminists about the blatantly sexist word that is "mansplaining"He doesn't know about MRA's outside of what he's heard from those who oppose MRA's. And even then he stated that he simply wasn't one, while supporting the things we support. But when it comes to feminism, he's hearing their double-think and is going "you claim to be for equality but then turn around and are sexist against men". Which he is then rabidly attacked for. So he rejects feminism and their sexist bullshit more and more. Remember, even if he ends up not liking MRA's, a lot of people who… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/16 10:13 PM |
| 10 | Minecraft billionaire 'Notch' just shut down feminists about the blatantly sexist word that is "mansplaining"I love how one feminist idiot, who clearly didn't know who he is and just Googled his name for some dirt immediately, tries to claim that he's a billionaire so he has privilege and doesn't understand before he shuts her down as well with the fact he WORKED his ass off to become a billionaire after being poor. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/16 10:09 PM |
| 100 | Absolutely pathetic, even by NY Mag standards: "Who Said It: Donald Trump or an MRA?"That's the worst thing. They're actually trying to portray those things as misogynistic. It's levels of fucking absurd. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/16 01:02 PM |
| 1 | '“I was like: ‘You’d better pay me or I’m going to go public.’ And they did,” says actress Robin Wright going public anyway even after Netflix paid her the same as co-star Kevin Spacey … Um ...I never said it was the only definition. Show me where I said that. Holy shit, you really want to dig that deep of a hole for yourself a this stage? That's not blackmail, it's leverage. Blackmail would require her threatening to expose something illegal. There is you blatantly stating it's not blackmail because blackmail would require threatening to expose something illegal. It's a BIT late to be trying to push this "I was just giving one of the definitions" bullshit. You directly tried to contr… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/16 04:00 PM |
| 1 | '“I was like: ‘You’d better pay me or I’m going to go public.’ And they did,” says actress Robin Wright going public anyway even after Netflix paid her the same as co-star Kevin Spacey … Um ...You accused me of lying And you were just shown to have lied. That you're still trying to claim that the legal definition in one area is somehow the only definition is further proof that you're lying. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/16 03:53 PM |
| 3 | Hypocrisy of a feminist mag editor pointed out and twitter loves it.Apply what they mention to calling women or a race what they call men and see how quickly they start screaming "OMG NOT ALL WOMEN YOU MISOGYNIST!". They speak of men as a sex, not a man. They place blame and responsibility on men as a sex, not a man. They have absolutely no argument to go on to defend the bullshit strawman in that pic. You can't claim you support equality if you think it's okay to disparage an entire sex because one guy did something you don't like. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/16 09:19 AM |
| 16 | Hypocrisy of a feminist mag editor pointed out and twitter loves it.Mentioning male genital mutilation in a discussion about child genital mutilation? Derailing! Mentioning male victims in a discussion about rape? Derailing! Mentioning male prison rape in a discussion about rape culture, a term that was coined to describe the actual culture of rape justification and apathy in and towards male prisons? Derailing! lol what about teh menz! Fuck, mentioning that the claim men as a sex are not all, or even a substantial minority, misogynistic rape apologists? Deraili… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/16 01:10 AM |
| 3 | when feminism goes full retard...in Canadian House of Commons..this happened today...an accidental elbow to the boob..feminists go full bore, female MP tweets afterwards "webelievethevictims".....Hysterical even. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/16 12:19 AM |
| 2 | when feminism goes full retard...in Canadian House of Commons..this happened today...an accidental elbow to the boob..feminists go full bore, female MP tweets afterwards "webelievethevictims".....Another male ally falls prey to feminism FTFY. Remember, according to feminists men can't be feminists only allies. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/16 12:17 AM |
| 3 | when feminism goes full retard...in Canadian House of Commons..this happened today...an accidental elbow to the boob..feminists go full bore, female MP tweets afterwards "webelievethevictims".....Remember, his version of equality was to give most of his affection and attention to his daughter and teach her she could do anything and when told he was neglecting his son he "corrected" that by, not also teaching him that he could be anything, but that they need to treat all women with respect. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/16 12:15 AM |
| 1 | '“I was like: ‘You’d better pay me or I’m going to go public.’ And they did,” says actress Robin Wright going public anyway even after Netflix paid her the same as co-star Kevin Spacey … Um ...hardly think that's akin to Again, blackmail isn't solely defined as a legal concept or even commonly used only in legal terms. What you did is quote one law in the US in response to people correctly mentioning this was blackmail in a desperate attempt to dismiss it. It was correctly used. What you're doing is akin to quoting the constitution to disprove people's issues with free speech being censored. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 11:14 PM |
| 1 | '“I was like: ‘You’d better pay me or I’m going to go public.’ And they did,” says actress Robin Wright going public anyway even after Netflix paid her the same as co-star Kevin Spacey … Um ...Blackmail verb 1. demand money from (someone) in return for not revealing compromising information about them. Emphasis mine. From any dictionary. Blackmail exists outside of US law, that you attempted to present a single law (when there are multiple other laws regarding it in both the US and abroad) is no different than those who ridiculously quote the US constitution when people try to defend free speech against censorship. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 10:05 PM |
| 0 | '“I was like: ‘You’d better pay me or I’m going to go public.’ And they did,” says actress Robin Wright going public anyway even after Netflix paid her the same as co-star Kevin Spacey … Um ...Her roles in Forrest Gump, The Princess Bride are what make her a somebody. So the shittiest character in films from decades ago make her somebody? No. But thankyou for using examples that prove our point. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 08:49 AM |
| 3 | '“I was like: ‘You’d better pay me or I’m going to go public.’ And they did,” says actress Robin Wright going public anyway even after Netflix paid her the same as co-star Kevin Spacey … Um ..."She's not a nobody! She's was in The Worst Character In The Princess Bride decades ago!" You understand this just further backs our point, right? | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 01:13 AM |
| 4 | '“I was like: ‘You’d better pay me or I’m going to go public.’ And they did,” says actress Robin Wright going public anyway even after Netflix paid her the same as co-star Kevin Spacey … Um ...You mean the season she directed to give herself more dialogue, screentime and play down her character being a piece of shit? No, we don't forget her bullshit the last two seasons, so her death or removal isn't going to be an issue. Especially when House of Cards ratings have been steadily dropping since the end of season 2. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 01:11 AM |
| 4 | '“I was like: ‘You’d better pay me or I’m going to go public.’ And they did,” says actress Robin Wright going public anyway even after Netflix paid her the same as co-star Kevin Spacey … Um ...She is by no means a new nobody She's a C list, possibly B list, actress who got a good role. That does not even remotely make her somebody in relation to Kevin Spacey. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 01:09 AM |
| 6 | '“I was like: ‘You’d better pay me or I’m going to go public.’ And they did,” says actress Robin Wright going public anyway even after Netflix paid her the same as co-star Kevin Spacey … Um ...For negotiating her sallery? Feigning ignorance on what the issue is when it was clearly spelled out in both the post you're replying to and the title of this thread is a really pathetic tactic. It's certainly not giving you an argument in her defense either. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 01:08 AM |
| 3 | '“I was like: ‘You’d better pay me or I’m going to go public.’ And they did,” says actress Robin Wright going public anyway even after Netflix paid her the same as co-star Kevin Spacey … Um ...Blackmail would require her threatening to expose something illegal I've been seeing this absurd, bullshit excuse floating around. In no way is required to be "illegal" for it to be such. Don't lie. Edit: Blackmail verb 1. demand money from (someone) in return for not revealing compromising information about them. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 01:05 AM |
| 2 | Stop telling women they’re doing feminism wrongFeminism, though, is not a political party; it is a movement that wants both equality and liberation for women. But then... However we might view “gender” I assume, given the previous mentions of transgenders, this relates to that. Gender definitions have absolutely no relationship to feminism and are a pathetic piggybacking attempt in the same way they tried to make feminism a race issue. basic demands such as equal pay Women have equal pay for equal work. This has been achieved in the Western … | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 12:40 AM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap 'does not exist' between men and women doing the same jobNo different than politicians supporting Creationism really. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/16 01:20 AM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap 'does not exist' between men and women doing the same jobFeminists are womens own worst enemy on this topic, I think FTFY | /r/MensRights | 13/05/16 01:19 AM |
| 1 | "If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege.Sadly, some of them do. 'Biting Beavers' poor kid. :( | /r/MensRights | 13/05/16 12:59 AM |
| 6 | Discussions of censorship on /r/MensRightsI am such a blight on the community that it has grown continually, year after year, and continues to flourish. That this sub continues to grow and shine despite your continued poor moderation and censorship is a testament to the Men's Rights community, not you. That you actually proceeded to declare MensRights success entirely to you is a testament to your ego. The SRS accusation is so ridiculous as to be absurd. Amazing. You use a contrived SRS-tier talking point effectively word for word and i… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/16 12:39 AM |
| 3 | Discussions of censorship on /r/MensRightsYou don't get to choose the format of the subreddit. You are free to create your own subreddit with your own rules if you refuse to play by the ones created for you. Almost word for word response we see from your SRS buddies, Silly. That you responded to someone voicing their opinion about a subject being discussed in this thread by complaining about them voicing that opinion continues to show how much of a blight you are on this community. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/16 11:04 PM |
| 4 | Harvard to bar members of all-male clubs from certain rolesMysteriously female-only clubs are exempt from this. Pathetic, that's blatant discrimination against male students. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/16 01:18 AM |
| 19 | Feminist women on NPR discuss women having to sign up for the draft. They oppose it by claiming they shouldn't have to be drafted until women are paid the same as men and the pay gap ends. They also find it perfectly fine for their own sons to have to, despite acknowledging the problems with it.Hell with being treated equally, i'll worry about the "wage gap" when it fucking exists. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/16 08:05 AM |
| 9 | Feminist women on NPR discuss women having to sign up for the draft. They oppose it by claiming they shouldn't have to be drafted until women are paid the same as men and the pay gap ends. They also find it perfectly fine for their own sons to have to, despite acknowledging the problems with it.must not remember high school. You don't even need to remember high school. Look at the female leaders that have come about through recent history. Hell, Indonesia's female leader was responsible for a freakin' genocide only a few decades ago. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/16 08:04 AM |
| 11 | Feminist women on NPR discuss women having to sign up for the draft. They oppose it by claiming they shouldn't have to be drafted until women are paid the same as men and the pay gap ends. They also find it perfectly fine for their own sons to have to, despite acknowledging the problems with it.Lets not bat that nonsense around. Women ARE paid the same for the same work. A man who is shit at negotiating contracts earns just the same as a woman shit at negotiating. A man who takes lots of sick leave earns just as much as a woman who takes lots of sick leave. A man who takes less and more flexible hours earns the same as a woman who takes less and more flexible hours. The pay gap doesn't exist. It's entirely choice, ability and dedication. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/16 03:29 AM |
| 34 | Feminist women on NPR discuss women having to sign up for the draft. They oppose it by claiming they shouldn't have to be drafted until women are paid the same as men and the pay gap ends. They also find it perfectly fine for their own sons to have to, despite acknowledging the problems with it.According to Swedish feminists, there won't even be a need for a draft because women in government end all wars. Somehow. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/16 02:20 AM |
| 7 | ANZ bank, the same one that pushed it's sexist pay gap myth campaign and illegally paid it's female employees more than men for less work, sees profits slump 22%, bank cuts dividend by 7%Seriously, why would anyone trust a bank that can't do BASIC freakin' accounting and statistics to know the pay gap doesn't exist. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 01:55 PM |
| 0 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.Sorry, it appears you still shitposting and refusing to address what i've said is still not giving you an argument. Perhaps come back when you've got something other than strawmen. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 01:42 PM |
| 0 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.So you're still refusing to address them, eh? Strangely enough that still doesn't give you an argument. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 01:04 PM |
| 0 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.Oh, you're still shitposting? That you still refuse to address what i've said and continue with these strawmen is pretty sad. You raging and ranting is still not giving you an argument. Come back when you can address what i've said. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 12:40 PM |
| 19 | ANZ bank, the same one that pushed it's sexist pay gap myth campaign and illegally paid it's female employees more than men for less work, sees profits slump 22%, bank cuts dividend by 7%Is it actually illegal to pay more money for less work? Based on sex, yes it is. Deliberate pay discrimination based on sex is illegal. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 12:02 PM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out when Australian morning show host points out mens issues exist and feminists are sexistsI posted the definition Which didn't apply, as was just pointed out. Apparently you feigning ignorance of that is still not magically giving you an argument. Who would've thought. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 11:15 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out when Australian morning show host points out mens issues exist and feminists are sexistsHe called her, by name, selfish. She was advocating segregated sex trains. Yes she was being selfish. You really aren't grasping what an insult is, are you. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 10:46 AM |
| 0 | Feminists flip out when Australian morning show host points out mens issues exist and feminists are sexistspersonal attacks He addressed the issue and then pointed out why they were pushing their false claims and sexism. You really don't quite grasp this, do you. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 10:16 AM |
| 0 | Feminists flip out when Australian morning show host points out mens issues exist and feminists are sexistsHe stated things that were true. That you're trying to claim stating facts is "disrespecting" someone says a lot more about you than him. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 10:12 AM |
| 1 | This is your brain on feminism: Right on queue after challenging the orthodoxy, and desperately apologizing to Emma Watson for criticizing feminism, Maisie Williams comes out telling everyone to stop calling girls "cute" and joins the 'LikeAGirl' campaignApparently she's done a nude sex scene in some recent film. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 09:52 AM |
| 13 | This is your brain on feminism: Right on queue after challenging the orthodoxy, and desperately apologizing to Emma Watson for criticizing feminism, Maisie Williams comes out telling everyone to stop calling girls "cute" and joins the 'LikeAGirl' campaignIt's pretty disturbing. She went from "I support equality but I'm not a feminist" to "oh, one of my celebrity feminist friends explained what feminism was. I'm a feminist but I don't like how all those others who call themselves feminists are against equality"... To now "oh shit, sorry sorry sorry, women have to stick together, feminism is great, I see now how women are oppressed in every aspect of society!" Feminism is a cult. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 06:47 AM |
| 0 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.Hmm, strangely enough you still haven't addressed what I've said. Your continued shitposting still isn't giving you an argument. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 01:05 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out when Australian morning show host points out mens issues exist and feminists are sexistsIt's not an insult if it's true. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 01:04 AM |
| 2 | Feminists flip out when Australian morning show host points out mens issues exist and feminists are sexistsIt's pretty hilarious how quickly you feminists out yourselves and rage quit from this sub. "Men lack rights in the Western world." "WHAT! I AM SO SICK OF THIS SUB! OH YES, THE WORLD IS TOOOTALLY OUT TO GET MEN, YOU MISOGYNISTS!" | /r/MensRights | 03/05/16 12:59 AM |
| 0 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.Oh, you're still going? See previous posts where you refuse to actually address what i've said. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/16 10:38 AM |
| 2 | Because boys can only think with their dick... Arizona high school justifies dress code in the most offensive way possible to both gendersFeminist high school student printed a piece of paper being sexist against boys out, somehow managed to say it was victimizing girls, added a #feminism quip to it, stapled it to the notice board and then told the school admin who immediately took it down. She then posted the photo online and went to the newspapers who made this fake assed story into a thing, despite none of what she claimed adding up. She claimed the staff put it up, even though it was immediately taken down and they began an in… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/16 03:03 AM |
| 0 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.Oh, you're still raging? Still? Seriously, SJW. No amount of crying and ranting is going to magically give you an argument. You're still refusing to address what i've said. And no, your repeated strawman are not arguments either. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/16 02:45 AM |
| 7 | Because boys can only think with their dick... Arizona high school justifies dress code in the most offensive way possible to both gendersThis is FAKE. A feminist high school student printed it out and then wrote a quip at the end. The literal only claims it was put up are from the female feminist student herself who claimed the librarian totally posted it up (but mysteriously the administration took it immediately down when she went to them). She printed out this moronic paper, wrote her own "comeback" on it, then stapled it to a notice board before complaining to the schools administrators who immediately removed it and stated t… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/16 02:38 AM |
| 43 | So Hillary has just announced that women will face separate and more lenient justice system.That shot out at me first thing too. It's really disturbing they included that and still lacked the self-awareness to see the issue. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/16 12:38 PM |
| 2 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.Accusing me of strawman? That's brave That's brave So you've given up any resemblance of an argument and are just shitposting now? Sorry, it appears you're still refusing to address my post and continuing to attack strawmen I've never made. That won't give you an argument either. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/16 04:51 AM |
| 1 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.The ability to repeat yourself, verbatim, doesn't make your argument stronger Sorry, deliberately ignoring my post specifically addressing your desperate fallacies and ignorance isn't magically making them go away, let alone invalidate them. You have been specifically addressed and you continue going on an irrelevant strawman tangent while refusing to address where you've been refuted. So, again, I'm going to stop your ridiculous rant right there trying to justify yourself by still going on abou… | /r/MensRights | 28/04/16 12:15 AM |
| 0 | Daniel Radcliffe sadly comes out defending the pay gap myth. He appears to have simply been told the propaganda rather than read it himself, ironically citing Jennifer Lawrence and Amy Adams, who weren't co-stars and were paid MORE per screen time than the actual main character stars.Screen actors guild and DGA rules. It applies pretty much across the board Projected gross is not retroactive payment based on sales, you moron. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/16 12:11 AM |
| -1 | Daniel Radcliffe sadly comes out defending the pay gap myth. He appears to have simply been told the propaganda rather than read it himself, ironically citing Jennifer Lawrence and Amy Adams, who weren't co-stars and were paid MORE per screen time than the actual main character stars.You claim screen time and dialogue as the metrics Which you've already been refuted on. and when confronted with Renner Who does not counter anything i've said. He was one of the three leads, was better known and had more dialogue and screentime. who had less He was a lead. There were only three leads and they were all the men. He had more dialogue and screentime. It seems you're letting your White Knight hardon for Amy get in the way of the facts. Bale, Cooper and Yes, and Renner. I'm aware Ada… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/16 11:54 AM |
| 0 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.Oh! I'm sorry! I didn't know you were a telepath! That changes everything! I see you're still desperately trying to push this already shut down idiocy. So, again, I'm going to stop your ridiculous rant trying to justify yourself by still going on about perception and memories These are women directly identifying someone they KNOW from an encounter, if at all, they DIRECTLY IDENTIFIED THE PERSON with. These women report the specific individual by name, not mistakenly identify someone who kinda lo… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/16 11:43 AM |
| 0 | Daniel Radcliffe sadly comes out defending the pay gap myth. He appears to have simply been told the propaganda rather than read it himself, ironically citing Jennifer Lawrence and Amy Adams, who weren't co-stars and were paid MORE per screen time than the actual main character stars.yeah, about that... A completely unrelated film? That you had to provide a news story because it's so rare does not make retroactive payment for films based on grossing earnings any more common. And by this logic every other actor in American Hustle should've been paid more, which means they're right back to the same pay scale. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/16 11:24 AM |
| 0 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.Years of psychology has taught us that human memory is utter shit. I'm going to stop your ridiculous rant trying to justify yourself by still going on about perception and memories. These are women directly identifying someone they KNOW from an encounter, if at all, they DIRECTLY IDENTIFIED THE PERSON with. These women report the specific individual by name, not mistakenly identify someone who kinda looks like them or picks the wrong guy out of a lineup. Unless you're actually trying to moronica… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/16 03:44 AM |
| 0 | Daniel Radcliffe sadly comes out defending the pay gap myth. He appears to have simply been told the propaganda rather than read it himself, ironically citing Jennifer Lawrence and Amy Adams, who weren't co-stars and were paid MORE per screen time than the actual main character stars.Except Jeremy Renner got paid the same Jeremy Renner? One of the main characters and an actor who had already been well known long before Jennifer Lawrence? Was paid the same as the other leads? While Jennifer Lawrence was paid more than him per percentage of screentime? And you think this is somehow an argument in favour? Adams sure seemed like a lead You liking Amy Adams doesn't magically increase her screentime or dialogue. So no, she wasn't. This was even discussed in the Sony leaks, with Am… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/16 03:14 AM |
| 1 | New Israeli study: 15% to 40% of rape complaints are lies.The overwhelming majority of rape claims are from someone they personally knew. If such a large percentage of those are being found false, then it's very, very doubtful that they are not deliberate and knowingly false rape accusations against specific individuals known to them beforehand. In which case the claim they "accidentally" named a specific individual they knew is just absurd. Right now your presenting the same nonsense talking points we see from feminists to claim "90% of rapists walk f… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/16 01:03 AM |
| 1 | Daniel Radcliffe sadly comes out defending the pay gap myth. He appears to have simply been told the propaganda rather than read it himself, ironically citing Jennifer Lawrence and Amy Adams, who weren't co-stars and were paid MORE per screen time than the actual main character stars.They are generally paid for the extra revenue they are expect to bring. And while that continued complaint remains irrelevant, as that is not what they are arguing to justify the pay gap claims, this has just been countered in the previous post... They were also not as famous as their male leads. "But mah J-Law!" doesn't make someone more famous. She had just broken out. Two extremely well known, established actors are not comparable. I don't see why you are still talking about the screen time. … | /r/MensRights | 27/04/16 12:47 AM |
| -1 | Daniel Radcliffe sadly comes out defending the pay gap myth. He appears to have simply been told the propaganda rather than read it himself, ironically citing Jennifer Lawrence and Amy Adams, who weren't co-stars and were paid MORE per screen time than the actual main character stars.It's sad really. He seems to have no idea of it outside of the propaganda he's heard, rather than seeing what happened and realizing that they were paid fairly. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/16 12:00 AM |
| 0 | Daniel Radcliffe sadly comes out defending the pay gap myth. He appears to have simply been told the propaganda rather than read it himself, ironically citing Jennifer Lawrence and Amy Adams, who weren't co-stars and were paid MORE per screen time than the actual main character stars.I don't think actors are generally paid by their screen-time They're not. But that absurd claim they were paid less is because they were in the film as stars, not accounting for the fact they... Were not main characters nor were they leads. They were side characters who were love interests of the two male leads. They had far less screentime. Given the comparison to screentime and dialogue, they were actually paid MORE than their male leads, immediately shutting down any of the complaints trying … | /r/MensRights | 26/04/16 11:57 PM |
| 2 | Laci Green Completely Lied and Nobody Called Her Out On It!We were calling it out quite a bit. In fact im pretty sure I was the one who posted her bullshit video here. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/16 05:18 AM |
| 4 | A 17 year old protesters gets triggered and falls apart crying when having to face basic logic and facts that men have less rights than women in the US and the Patriarchy doesn't exist. It's disturbing children like her have been brainwashed their entire lives to believe feminist bullshit.A lot of Mexicans are actually descendants of only indigenous peoples Even ignoring for a moment that this is not even remotely true, i'm pretty sure raping an entire people doesn't make her ancestors less genocidal. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/16 03:14 PM |
| 92 | A 17 year old protesters gets triggered and falls apart crying when having to face basic logic and facts that men have less rights than women in the US and the Patriarchy doesn't exist. It's disturbing children like her have been brainwashed their entire lives to believe feminist bullshit.At the end there... I cry about everything And there it is. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/16 12:53 PM |
| 199 | A 17 year old protesters gets triggered and falls apart crying when having to face basic logic and facts that men have less rights than women in the US and the Patriarchy doesn't exist. It's disturbing children like her have been brainwashed their entire lives to believe feminist bullshit.And she's Mexican. Her Spanish ancestors literally invaded the Americas and wiped out nearly the entire population and she's raging about him somehow being responsible for something before his was born because she thought he was white. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/16 12:52 PM |
| 28 | Feminists are putting out a propaganda magazine filled with refuted nonsense directly aimed at girls under 10 years old, including pay gap myth, anti-boy shit. The Kickstarter mysteriously made $135,800 within 26 days.A shrill, annoying thing that produces nothing of meaning. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/16 10:02 AM |
| 1 | Once again a feminist politician deliberately targets men as a sex with law over an unrelated abortion law that doesn't target women for being women and majority of those opposing abortion are women. "Joke" laws that are knowingly and intentionally being misandrist to "prove a point" are disgusting.This is meant to show that laws restricting abortion are wron There's always someone trying to defend this with this nonsense logic. Revenge laws against men aren't justified because "it's a joke cause womens rights" either. Blatant sexism against men is NOT okay just because of a law unrelated to sex and is just as supported by women. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/16 12:24 AM |
| 2 | No need for female marines to do Pull-ups - ''temporary delay" now permanentTake a look at the previous threads about exactly this on the various feminist subs or even /r/News. Highly upvoted top comments were all justifying it with "they are specifically saying the standards won't be lowered, you MRA misogynists!" | /r/MensRights | 22/04/16 12:07 AM |
| 1 | No need for female marines to do Pull-ups - ''temporary delay" now permanentFuck, the assholes were even trying to demonize the doctors and hospital staff who protected her. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/16 12:04 AM |
| 6 | A South Carolina lawmaker is proposing that men who want to get Viagra or other drugs to help them have sex wait for 24 hours and get a sworn statement from their sexual partners detailing their problems.Since you all clearly are missing the point of this. No you're missing the point. Abortion laws do not target women for BEING women, they are regarding beliefs (right or wrong) over abortion being the ending of a human life. Women make up the majority of anti-abortionists. This law is deliberately and knowingly targeting men AS A SEX for BEING men. "Oh b-but it's just a joke". Bullshit. There is absolutely no fucking excuse for a politician in the United States to deliberately attempt to get law… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/16 10:17 PM |
| 3 | $30 Million of Australian taxpayers money is to be wasted on an ad campaign targeted at boys (but not girls) so they won't "disrespect women". Attempts to claim that being disrespectful to a woman means you will grow up to rape or beat women.I'm not sure what the stats for non-death abuse injuries are Wouldn't matter anyone. Their statistics for "one woman killed a week" do some hefty reaching but in relation to their own statistics a man is killed by his female partner through domestic violence every 10 days. Oh no, a woman every 7 days. That needs $30 million. But women killing men every 10 days? Despite men being the overwhelming victims of violence and deaths (especially murders) in general? Nothing. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/16 09:55 AM |
| 1 | $30 Million of Australian taxpayers money is to be wasted on an ad campaign targeted at boys (but not girls) so they won't "disrespect women". Attempts to claim that being disrespectful to a woman means you will grow up to rape or beat women.If we're out playing soccer and I tell you you're kicking like a girl - so? That's ridiculous enough as it is. But they tried to portray the girl as the victim of the father "bullying" his son. Even when it's the boy being attacked, somehow it's the girl who is the victim. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/16 09:53 AM |
| 3 | $30 Million of Australian taxpayers money is to be wasted on an ad campaign targeted at boys (but not girls) so they won't "disrespect women". Attempts to claim that being disrespectful to a woman means you will grow up to rape or beat women.What the actual fuck? The first "abusive" behavior is: A freakin', (what, 7-8 year old??) boy runs outside to play with friends, the girl follows them but the door accidentally closes in her face. As in the boy has his back to the girl and doesn't have knowledge she is behind him and the door closes by itself and she accidentally runs into it. This is somehow abuse from the small child (who doesn't even know what sex is at this stage) but the mother goes "he did it because he likes you"? Even ig… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/16 08:08 AM |
| 1 | FALSE RAPE ACCUSATIONS?? - laci green (direct link)Just a reminder that Laci Green also lied about Sam Pepper as well. Including calling him a rapist and sexual assaulter based on literally anonymous video and Tumblr posts. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/16 10:35 AM |
| 7 | Laci Green comes out with "listen and believe" level bullshit over the Tobuscus rape accusations. This is despite the fact that the accuser hasn't provided ANY evidence, still refuses to go to the police and evidence actually refutes much of her story.Look, I'm not saying Laci Green raped me... But Laci Green raped me. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/16 04:54 AM |
| 2 | Laci Green comes out with "listen and believe" level bullshit over the Tobuscus rape accusations. This is despite the fact that the accuser hasn't provided ANY evidence, still refuses to go to the police and evidence actually refutes much of her story.You can watch it through Reddit. Or use VPN. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/16 02:58 AM |
| 1 | Laci Green comes out with "listen and believe" level bullshit over the Tobuscus rape accusations. This is despite the fact that the accuser hasn't provided ANY evidence, still refuses to go to the police and evidence actually refutes much of her story.Just a reminder that Laci Green also lied about Sam Pepper as well. Including calling him a rapist and sexual assaulter based on literally anonymous video and Tumblr posts. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/16 01:32 AM |
| 3 | Buzzfeed unintentionally paints feminists as idiots who shut their brains off the moment facts are brought up (pay gap myth, rights of men)[pushes pay gap myth] [your same logic concluding it exists shows that women earn more] "OMG THE PAY GAP DOESN'T EXIST! WOMEN AREN'T PAID MORE!" | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 10:12 PM |
| 2 | Buzzfeed unintentionally paints feminists as idiots who shut their brains off the moment facts are brought up (pay gap myth, rights of men)MRAs try to undermine feminists Oh no, MRA's "undermine" feminists by refuting all of their harmful, bullshit lies and claims? How terrible! which not only does NOTHING to help any social issue Refuting, countering and debunking this bullshit that harms men and boys and infantizes women does indeed help social issues. So that desperate nonsense isn't going to fly. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 10:09 PM |
| 53 | Buzzfeed unintentionally paints feminists as idiots who shut their brains off the moment facts are brought up (pay gap myth, rights of men)Of course it's accurate. But when has Buzzfeed ever been accurate intentionally. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 04:23 AM |
| 2 | I am glad to see other people getting annoyed by changing men's restrooms to anyone's restroomsIsn't this illegal? | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 01:25 AM |
| 3 | The feminist group that is responsible for getting AVFM taken down is attempting to mass false report it again after it was restored. Clear and blatant violation of Facebooks rules.Buuut then we just become her They're breaking the rules with both what they're doing, how they're doing it and the fake account they're using. We don't become shit like her. Reporting her is according to the rules, while she is violating them with her false reports. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 10:17 PM |
| 1 | The feminist group that is responsible for getting AVFM taken down is attempting to mass false report it again after it was restored. Clear and blatant violation of Facebooks rules.Remember to rate that review as bad and say why. I've done that a few times despite the automatic review stating "no violation found". | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 10:15 PM |
| 5 | The feminist group that is responsible for getting AVFM taken down is attempting to mass false report it again after it was restored. Clear and blatant violation of Facebooks rules.That just begets the same thing more and more. Take the high-ground. No, we are taking the high ground. What they're doing is blatantly against Facebooks rules and ToS. She is mass falsely reporting. That's a reportable offense . | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 10:13 PM |
| 9 | Heart breaking video shows children forced to live with their abusive mother.You probably should complain that an anecdote couldn't have happened...in a thread with video evidence of it happening. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 04:28 AM |
| 135 | Facebook has now banned A Voice for MenIt's a co-ordinated effort to render anything against feminism on Google, Facebook and other social media. As in they've literally had meetings to push this agenda. This is a major fuckup on their side though, the world has been steadily getting pissed off by feminism and the one thing that unites people is when you censor content. NOTHING is too big to fall. Remember that. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 02:25 AM |
| 1 | Salem Witch Trials 2.0Pointing out that gender dysphoria is, by definition, a mental illness is the same as removing due process and witch hunting innocent people? | /r/MensRights | 11/04/16 04:19 AM |
| 1 | Salem Witch Trials 2.0Salem Witch trials Hell, you don't even need to go back that far. Feminist rape hysteria is the Satanic Ritual Abuse hysteria of the modern day. And that only occurred as far back as the 90's. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/16 04:16 AM |
| 1 | Australian Greens party goes full sexist and deliberately puts out an all women team for their political seatsI think it more likely that our politicians are taking a cue from the Amerikan Democrats and using feminism as a way of covering up real issues Ah yes, but while that is true the major component comes from the lack of Australian specific facts and studies to refute them. They're pumping out the pay gap myth right now, even though it has been refuted in every single Western country. When you use this fact, they cry "but our feminist studies are about Australia". Logical people understand why what… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/16 04:09 AM |
| 1 | "Punishment for Abortion" - The lack of sheer self-awareness in this cartoon is just ridiculous (also apparently men aren't abortion doctors)Link? Her signature looks like 'sign e=nd2'. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/16 03:06 AM |
| 23 | "Punishment for Abortion" - The lack of sheer self-awareness in this cartoon is just ridiculous (also apparently men aren't abortion doctors)Worse still is that it's always removed the fathers from the equation, my body my choice, and the moment they might get punished for it then suddenly "responsibilty is 50/50 even if you didn't committ the crime". | /r/MensRights | 11/04/16 01:07 AM |
| 1 | Australian Greens party goes full sexist and deliberately puts out an all women team for their political seatsThey're going through the first stages of feminists entering academia and politics and beginning to impose their misandrist narrative on children and students. While you're seeing a massive pushback against feminism in the rest of the world because people have had decades to prepare and research and refute their bullshit claims, Australia is a very sparse country and doesn't have detailed statistics or research centers to provide objective evidence that contradict feminists there. So feminists a… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/16 10:18 PM |
| 9 | Australian Greens party goes full sexist and deliberately puts out an all women team for their political seatsWhy is this sexist? Because they have deliberately placed out all female only candidates solely because they are female. It's direct and deliberate discrimination based on sex by a political party. Parties have put out all male candidates before. What an absurd attempt to twist this. Those parties have put out people who happen to be male. They didn't deliberately put out solely male candidates based on their sex. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/16 02:37 PM |
| 5 | Clementine Ford has been pushing this everywhere: Feminist cherry pick male movies and remarkably find that they have a lot of male dialogueDo you dislike her so much, that you When you can't find an argument, just go right for that tired old desperate fallacy. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/16 02:28 PM |
| 3 | According to leaked meeting minutes the Florida Bar - Family Law Section instructed members to send emails to the Governor asking for veto of Divorce Reform bill, but emphasized that personal email accounts be used so they don't seem to be coming from all lawyersDisgusting. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/16 09:49 AM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.A judgement is the final decision on the case. A judgement was made. You can't appeal a judgement unless it has been made, little SJW. appealing the ruling Yes, the ruling that said she lost. Now the appeal has been thrown out as well. That you're still raging with a brand new account you made solely to shitpost here because you were refuted is just hilarious. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/16 05:56 AM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.because the judgement didn't fucking exist Yes, it did. Appealing a decision means a judgement has been made, that you're still raging and shitposting about this is really sad. Worse still is now that her appeal has been thrown out with everything else you're still trying to rage and claim she never lost. Sorry, your shitposting alt account isn't giving you an argument. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/16 12:28 AM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.Yeah, she lost her case 3 days ago Strange how that's the date you created this shitposting account to continue raging at me. 5 days ago Because she had already lost the case. It was over. As has been repeatedly pointed out, her lawyers APPEALED it. Now they have completely thrown out her case, appeal and all. She lost the case. That you're still raging trying to argue otherwise is as hilarious as your desperate creating of a shitposting account to rage at me. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 03:48 PM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.Lemme make this as simple as I can for you. Oh, you're still shitposting? Your nonsense has been refuted by the court itself. She lost her case. Completely. There is no more case (other than Dr. Luke now possibly suing her for defamation). Her case has been thrown out. That you're still shitspamming despite this fact is really hilarious at this point, as is your continued ranting with your brand new account. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 03:03 PM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.Are judgements and rulings the It appears that you spouting off irrelevant screaming isn't an argument either. She lost the case. That's a fact. It has been completely thrown out. fails to address its content You began by spamming with a bran new account and then immediately raged I didn't answer a question you had never asked. Now you're ranting that i'm not answering a fallacy. Strangely enough no matter how much nonsense you continue to spam, it's not giving you an argument. She lost. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 02:04 PM |
| 25 | So...feminists have "made a meme" with Maisie Williams (GoT) quote about anyone who isn't a feminist is a sexist"Look, i'm not saying you're either with us or against us. But you're either with us or rapist misogynist bigots!" - Feminists | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 02:01 PM |
| 12 | So...feminists have "made a meme" with Maisie Williams (GoT) quote about anyone who isn't a feminist is a sexistHa, less than 25% on a good poll. The average is between 15 and 20-ish percent. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 02:00 PM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.Are judgements and rulings the You've literally never asked that question once before claiming i'm "dodging". You're a bit of a moron aren't you. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 01:12 PM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.I made this account days ago. ...yes. This is why I said brand new account. Quit dodging Dodging what? You didn't ask a question you idiot. condescending prick You came in to rant about absolutely nothing and posted Google. You're going to have to try something other than these desperate fallacies. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 12:37 PM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.You said she lost the case, which is total utter bullshit. Aaaand now it's been thrown completely out appeal and all. Yeah, little SJW, she lost the case. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 11:56 AM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.You made a brand new account to keep ranting at me, eh? | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 11:53 AM |
| 12 | Court seals as "confidential" the testimony of Rolling Stones discredited false rape accuser 'Jackie'Sure is. But SJW admins keep deleting it and shadowbanning every time it's posted. Quite telling. | /r/PussyPass | 09/04/16 11:47 AM |
| 6 | Court seals as "confidential" the testimony of Rolling Stones discredited false rape accuser 'Jackie'Still upvoted fuckloads though. | /r/PussyPass | 09/04/16 07:30 AM |
| 8 | Court seals as "confidential" the testimony of Rolling Stones discredited false rape accuser 'Jackie'I'll just leave these unrelated pictures here on this thread about Jackie. | /r/PussyPass | 09/04/16 03:33 AM |
| 1 | Kesha must honor Sony contract with Dr. Luke despite claims of date rape because no New York laws were broken, judge rulesFrom SWAG U. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/04/16 09:42 PM |
| 2 | Kesha must honor Sony contract with Dr. Luke despite claims of date rape because no New York laws were broken, judge rulesHe was actually a huge douchebag. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/04/16 09:42 PM |
| 8 | Kesha must honor Sony contract with Dr. Luke despite claims of date rape because no New York laws were broken, judge rulesabsolutely no insight into the type of person she is That makes tons of sense. Really it does. ...were she not exactly the trashy, slutty, drug fueled idiot outside of her music videos too. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/04/16 09:41 PM |
| 85 | Kesha must honor Sony contract with Dr. Luke despite claims of date rape because no New York laws were broken, judge rulesI'm not sure why this is getting downvoted, as this is 100% PPD Lot of brigading of all the threads since the verdict came out. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/04/16 06:34 AM |
| 117 | Kesha must honor Sony contract with Dr. Luke despite claims of date rape because no New York laws were broken, judge rulesLove that all Keshas SJW fans are brigading every thread about this they can find on Reddit today. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/04/16 03:17 AM |
| 153 | Kesha must honor Sony contract with Dr. Luke despite claims of date rape because no New York laws were broken, judge rulesThis is fucked up and wrong. She... Under oath stated she was never raped or molested Blatantly refused to work with another producer and never interact or see Dr. Luke again, even though her justification for wanting to have her contract voided was that she would have to interact and see Dr. Luke. Has LITERALLY absolutely no evidence either for her claims or in her favour. In fact actual evidence refuting her. Oh no, the judge threw out a fraudulent case by a proven liar. Sorry chump this is de… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/04/16 03:15 AM |
| 1 | National Science Foundation grants $548k to University of Michigan for a study of male engineering students' "microaggressions" toward female classmates.Aaahahah oh shit, I remember that. Good find. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 02:01 AM |
| 1 | National Science Foundation grants $548k to University of Michigan for a study of male engineering students' "microaggressions" toward female classmates.Know the name of the video? | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 01:17 AM |
| 7 | National Science Foundation grants $548k to University of Michigan for a study of male engineering students' "microaggressions" toward female classmates.Feminist science: Researching how to make your preconceived notions seem real. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 11:31 PM |
| 11 | National Science Foundation grants $548k to University of Michigan for a study of male engineering students' "microaggressions" toward female classmates.That's in their opening for the study. They... Already assume that Microagressions are real Already assume the gender disparity is because of sexism against women in the work place Already assume that Microagressions are causing this sexism against women and keeping them out of STEM, they are just trying to figure out "how" Their entire study is as unscientific as you can get and in a normal world would be thrown out after the first peer review. They are directly and knowingly cherry picking dat… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 11:30 PM |
| 2 | National Science Foundation grants $548k to University of Michigan for a study of male engineering students' "microaggressions" toward female classmates.shes also one of the masterminds behind that absolutely retarded "girls can do science and be cute too" promotional video to try enticing girls into STEM Oh god, link please? Link to mirror or article on it? I want to see this hilarious shit. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 11:26 PM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.sperm bag Can't even think up good insults as well? That's sad. her lawyers are appealing a ruling in a case That's so odd, since you've spent the last few posts raging that such a thing never happened. Whoops. no judgment Apart from, you know, the ruling... Are you actually mentally challenged? you don't know the meaning! Oh boy, irony. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 06:42 AM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.Shit stain Sure lacking arguments there. at no point did I say ...I asked if you understood this. That you've managed to take that and go on a ranting spiel about "I DIDN SAY DAT!" is pretty hilarious. There has been no judgement Yes, yes, clearly her lawyers appealing the judges decision are all invisible elves. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 06:32 AM |
| 1 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.You said she lost the case She did lose that case. Which is why her lawyers are appealing the decision. You understand that civil court isn't "guilty or not guilty", little raging SJW? | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 06:26 AM |
| 2 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.Maybe you should try learning some basic terminology you fuck face. It's hilarious how you SJW's immediately jump to the "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE" stage. She's appealing a ruling A ruling that declared her claims bullshit. She's lost. There s no judgment Her own lawyer would disagree. Whoops. Judges give lots of rulings And what this judge ruled had her sad lawyer ranting about it being "literal slavery" before trying to appeal. must've watched TV It appears you have no idea how civil courts work, sinc… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/16 09:52 PM |
| 1 | Watch Girlfriends Grill Evil Boyfriends on Their Gun OwnershipFor her. What if he's a big guy? | /r/MensRights | 05/04/16 04:19 AM |
| 2 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.Oh please, do explain how her lawyers are appealing the judgement if they didn't... | /r/MensRights | 05/04/16 02:33 AM |
| 2 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.She didn't lose any case. No, no, clearly not. Her lawyers just appealed the decision for shits and giggles while screaming "this is literally slavery". | /r/MensRights | 04/04/16 11:55 PM |
| 2 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.I was banned from Music for this thread. Apparently it's "brigading". Somehow. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/16 09:54 PM |
| 9 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.innocent until proven guilty She is the one making the claim. The ones who are innocent until proven guilty are those she's making the claims against, she is a proven liar and making further claims without evidence does not give any validity to those claims. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/16 09:53 PM |
| 16 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.B-but she said it was true on Instagram you shitlord rape apologist! | /r/MensRights | 04/04/16 01:35 PM |
| 5 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.Her mothers also been handling the shit out of her since day one. It's pretty disturbing. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/16 01:32 PM |
| 9 | Kesha continues to push her bullshit. Now claiming that she was offered to be let out of her contract if she said no rape occurred, despite rape not being relevant to her lawsuit with Sony and this allegedly occurring months ago. Only claiming so AFTER she lost her case.Looks like the Music users from their circlejerk Kesha thread are brigading this thread. Hilariously all they can come up with to argue against the evidence against Kesha is to downvote and rant about my post history. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/16 11:24 AM |
| 28 | Australian University to Hold 'Femenist Bake Sale: "Each baked good will only cost you the proportion of $1.00 - if you are a woman of colour in the legal profession, a baked good at the stall will only cost you 0.55 cents!"A god damn professor is pushing this bullshit. Isn't this illegal in Australia, as the government funds their schools? "Many men generally speaking have the extra pay as an unearned privilege" So literally EARNING that money by working MORE hours with MORE work is now somehow "unearned"? Fuck off. "If we actually looked at that the work women do to raise children at home, what cost would we be putting on that, how much is that worth to us?." Holy shit. She's claiming women are paid less...for no… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/16 05:39 AM |
| 5 | Domestic Abuser Hope Solo to sue over being paid less for doing less work and earning the team less moneyIf this is true It's not. They compared more men's games in an average year to less womens games in a world cup year. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/16 04:13 AM |
| 4 | Domestic Abuser Hope Solo to sue over being paid less for doing less work and earning the team less moneynow is that time They are not asking for a raise. They are demanding to be paid more than they are worth by comparing less games in a world cup year to more games in an average men's year. They're asking for more money than the men. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/16 04:12 AM |
| 2 | Domestic Abuser Hope Solo to sue over being paid less for doing less work and earning the team less moneywomen's game generated more income for US Soccer than the men's No, it isn't a legitimate complaint. They're comparing less games for a world cup year with more games for an average men's year. It's blatant bullshit. No different than the bullshit claims the rest of the time about the "sports pay gap" myth. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/16 04:10 AM |
| 2 | Teacher charged with sexual assault of a child argues she cannot be guilty because she was "on her back in a submissive position"Nope. She was still raped. There was a recent case where a woman gave a blowjob to a guy who was passed out and cried rape because she "revoked her consent" and he didn't stop lying there taking it. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/16 12:17 AM |
| 3 | A list of feminist resources 'tackling mens issues' [sic]Every single one of those links is refutable, has absolutely no relation to men, has nothing to do with feminism, didn't help men or oppressed men. This is just...so fucking telling. This is a detailed list of every example of "feminism helping men" that feminists could come up with. And it shows exactly how feminist haven't helped men. We should create a detailed refutation and counterng of every nonsense claim on that list and bring it up as an example to shut down "feminism helps men too!" ev… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/16 03:01 PM |
| 15 | Jian Ghomeshi was found innocent, his accusers were proven to have lied and now people are demanding a "special court" for sexual assault that puts the burden of proof on the accused. All because due process and justice was served.You and your LOGIC! | /r/MensRights | 25/03/16 10:40 AM |
| 1 | LGBT Student Activist Group Says Gay Men Not Oppressed Enough to Deserve RepresentationNow, you see homosexual couples on TV shows and it's not even mentioned it's so normal. So why the fuck would lesbians get a free pass? Women currently have more rights than men in Western countries, so they are the least oppressed in comparison to gays. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/16 10:48 PM |
| 1 | LGBT Student Activist Group Says Gay Men Not Oppressed Enough to Deserve RepresentationThis. As homosexuality has stopped being such a stigma in the Western world, I feel we can finally return to being guys doing guy things. What drove us apart was religion, what'll bring us together is, paradoxically, is the Feminist religion. FYFY | /r/MensRights | 23/03/16 10:46 PM |
| 1 | LGBT Student Activist Group Says Gay Men Not Oppressed Enough to Deserve RepresentationI keep seeing "Two-Spirit" used as a genuine attachment to GLBT. Even outside of the US. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/16 10:45 PM |
| 2 | LGBT Student Activist Group Says Gay Men Not Oppressed Enough to Deserve RepresentationI've used it mockingly a few times and nearly every time they thought it was legit. SJW don't know their own acronyms. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/16 10:42 PM |
| 4 | LGBT Student Activist Group Says Gay Men Not Oppressed Enough to Deserve RepresentationTransgenders should never have been placed into LGB. They are unrelated to the rights being faught for for LGB people, which refers to sexuality not what sex you wish you were. If anything it should've been intersex. But even that isn't needed as bisexual covers it and adding more letters is as absurd as pitting demisexial or polyamourous in it. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/16 03:24 AM |
| 4 | I Went on a Date With a (Closeted) MRA - The Frisky“If women had the option of removing the fetus and letting it grow outside their bodies, would abortion ever still need to be necessary?” He asked me. “Yes, absolutely,” I replied immediately. “It’s a woman’s right to decide whether she wants a fetus to grow into a child—inside or outside her own body.” Holy shit. This woman is fucking retarded. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/16 01:00 AM |
| 2 | I Went on a Date With a (Closeted) MRA - The FriskyWhere she has a former groupie claim they totally did it when she was underage. And provides absolutely no evidence whatsoever to the point of claiming pictures of her when she was 17 with other famous rock stars proves she had sex with Bowie when she was between 15 and 19 years old. It was absurd and a obviously fake story but they pushed it anyway. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/16 12:58 AM |
| 2 | Will Matrix film-makers coming out as women turn off men's rights activists?The comments are just as bad. People keep pointing out that Red Pillers are not MRA's and MRA's don't have issues with transwomen, only to be met with feminists posting links to Return of Kings. Then when everyone keeps pointing out links to RoK flat out saying they are not an MRA and oppose the MRM they scream "no true scotsman fallacy" and claim that "TERFS don't call themselves TERFS either". They are completely deranged and inventing enemies. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/16 10:49 AM |
| 0 | Judge blasts *city* in firing of teacher charged with raping kid...Evidence that she cannot legally consider because it was obtained illegally. Evidence that is more than admissible for the NYC Dept of Education who do not have to meet legal standards like a judge would. They have evidence she raped a child, she can damn well be fired. | /r/PussyPass | 21/03/16 09:53 PM |
| 2 | Justin Treudou explains why men need feminism: Because he wife took him aside a few months ago and said that it's good that he is empowering his daughter to do anything but he needs to help his sons too...by telling them not to treat women well and not rapeNo rapists in feminist fox holes. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/16 09:38 PM |
| 8 | Woman screams at Reporter to leave because he is a "fucking white male". Isn't it sad that this considered fairly normal now?"Who needs good men when I have all these cats!" | /r/MensRights | 20/03/16 01:53 AM |
| 6 | Feminists are still trying to make #BirthRape a thing.When your complaint is that the doctors "didn't get your consent" to perform emergency procedures, you have no legitimate medical complaint. | /r/MensRights | 18/03/16 02:26 PM |
| 2 | Feminists are still trying to make #BirthRape a thing.Feminist making false rape accusations is something we discuss here as well, account that only has 3 posts despite being a year old. | /r/MensRights | 18/03/16 02:00 PM |
| 6 | Feminists are still trying to make #BirthRape a thing.Are you dating a feminist? Because this will likely not be a problem if she does what the doctors recommend. | /r/MensRights | 18/03/16 01:59 PM |
| 31 | Florida Bar Association says it no longer supports alimony-reform. "Fuck you guys, I'm going home." says Cartman.she's been cyberbullied on social media a group called the First Husbands Alimony Group posts photos of her and criticizes her for going out, traveling and skiing. ... she's been cyberbullied on social media a group called the First Husbands Alimony Group posts photos of her and criticizes her for going out, traveling and skiing. ... she's been cyberbullied on social media a group called the First Husbands Alimony Group posts photos of her and criticizes her for going out, traveling and skiing. … | /r/MensRights | 16/03/16 02:02 PM |
| 0 | Student who was falsely accused of rape by Mattress Girl (Emma Sulkowicz) has just been denied his legal rights as the judge declared that being accused of rape apparently doesn't relate to sex and therefore isn't Title IXWe need an Abradolf Lincler. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/16 02:28 PM |
| 1 | Student who was falsely accused of rape by Mattress Girl (Emma Sulkowicz) has just been denied his legal rights as the judge declared that being accused of rape apparently doesn't relate to sex and therefore isn't Title IXMechahitler? | /r/MensRights | 15/03/16 02:21 PM |
| 6 | Student who was falsely accused of rape by Mattress Girl (Emma Sulkowicz) has just been denied his legal rights as the judge declared that being accused of rape apparently doesn't relate to sex and therefore isn't Title IXIf a woman at school claimed with no evidence that I approached at school and told her I loved her over and over again, the school has to kick me out if she complains FTFY I love the first amendment This is not damaging the first amendment. In any remote way. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/16 01:45 PM |
| 21 | Student who was falsely accused of rape by Mattress Girl (Emma Sulkowicz) has just been denied his legal rights as the judge declared that being accused of rape apparently doesn't relate to sex and therefore isn't Title IXCouldn't hurt to dig though. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/16 11:20 AM |
| 46 | Student who was falsely accused of rape by Mattress Girl (Emma Sulkowicz) has just been denied his legal rights as the judge declared that being accused of rape apparently doesn't relate to sex and therefore isn't Title IXI know you're embarrassed to be caught fibbing, but your little tantrum Still digging that hole for yourself, eh? Here is the judges own words refuting you: He assumes that because the allegations against him concerned a sexual act that everything that follows from it is 'sex-based' within the meaning of Title IX. Run along back to SRS, little SJW. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/16 09:53 AM |
| 56 | Student who was falsely accused of rape by Mattress Girl (Emma Sulkowicz) has just been denied his legal rights as the judge declared that being accused of rape apparently doesn't relate to sex and therefore isn't Title IXYes he did. But I see you already knew that, since you're a 4 day old account that does nothing but shitpost around Reddit, has never posted here before and is sitting on -100 karma. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/16 08:57 AM |
| 3 | Rosie Batty, Australian poster girl for domestic violence against women after her husband killed their son, claims half of Swedish women are domestically abused by men, blames a mother beating her son on fathers then claiming that the failure of feminism there means Australia needs a feminist party.I love that their response to an overwhelmingly feminist society and government being in place before the claimed rise in domestic violence and during their feminist rule is...more feminism. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/16 04:41 AM |
| 12 | Divorcee wins 90 per cent of husband's wealth in bitter court battle. Company boss, Peter Morris, has nothing but his 'anger' to show for 25 years of marriage after a series of rulingsthey deserve something They don't deserve a thing. Especially if they instigate the divorce. But if they're going to get anything they should only be getting MINIMUM wage for a full time worker for a limited number of years. And that should only be for vastly above minimum wage where the partner can afford it. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/16 03:52 AM |
| 1 | Saw this on Skepchick's facebook page... no irony detected. I think she actually thought this was funny.And it was just so absurd too. The guy asked her up to talk over some coffee in THE most polite and non-confrontational, calm possible way and she still managed to flip her shit and call him a misogynist, potential rapist and harasser. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/16 12:54 PM |
| 2 | The Young Turks blame MRA's for unsourced complaints against John Boyega from a fucking Buzzfeed article that NEVER MENTION MRA'sFor you. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/16 04:41 AM |
| 3 | The Young Turks blame MRA's for unsourced complaints against John Boyega from a fucking Buzzfeed article that NEVER MENTION MRA'sTraitor to the Empire. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/16 03:11 AM |
| 2 | The Young Turks blame MRA's for unsourced complaints against John Boyega from a fucking Buzzfeed article that NEVER MENTION MRA'sas I've heard literally nothing from fellow MRA's about Boyega. Even the people trolling him aren't actually calling him out, they're calling him a traitor because it's a running joke regarding his Star Wars character. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/16 12:01 AM |
| 11 | Australian bank ANZs new ad. Pushing the wage gap myth on childrenEven if I were a deranged feminist I wouldn't trust a bank that literally can't handle basic math that they think the pay gap is real. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/16 02:09 PM |
| 26 | Australian bank ANZs new ad. Pushing the wage gap myth on childrenTake your money out of the bank. State clearly in a direct letter to the manager and the company that you are removing your money because of their blatant sexism and misandry. Place your money in another bank and state in a letter to their manager and company that you are removing your money from the ANZ because of their sexism against men and want a company that handles money and not misandrist politics. It does help. Not a new post from ANZ goes by on their Facebook page where someone isn't do… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/16 01:33 PM |
| 12 | Did international men's day get any mentions from google, facebook, youtube, or snapchat?Literally the only mentions of International Womens Day i've seen on Facebook from those I know have been people ranting about the pay gap and that "men steal credit for womens ideas" and raging about International Mens Day despite no-one but themselves mentioning it. International Mens Day is for innocent fathers who have been abused by the court system, men and boys who are victims and men and boys suicide, deaths and abuse help. Yet it is openly mocked by media. Yet International Womens Day i… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/16 12:20 AM |
| 2 | Feminists try and claim that if you don't date a feminist man, you'll be sexist because he'll make you sexist and have internalized misogynyNo, not even dictated by their boyfriends. Apparently just being around people who are not feminist (classified as being "sexist") and getting along with that person and understanding their views will magically make them also sexist and have internalized misogyny. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 07:07 AM |
| 3 | Does porn really degrade women? People who watch adult content are MORE likely to be feminists than those who don't.be feminist They said they support equality. That's not the same thing. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 05:54 AM |
| 18 | Actual headline in actual newspaper: "5 times the new 'Ghostbusters' trailer destroyed the patriarchy"We've got a bingo card game going on over in KotakuInAction regarding the stupid shit feminists are trying and going to pull over this terrible Ghostbusters reboot if you guys want to play here. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 05:39 AM |
| -5 | Just found this. Some idiot is trying to push for those absurd "revenge porn" laws in Australia with a completely unrelated claimYou just keep digging that hole of yours don't you. In what deranged court would a judge declare this to be actual nude photos of her? | /r/MensRights | 04/03/16 07:53 AM |
| -2 | Just found this. Some idiot is trying to push for those absurd "revenge porn" laws in Australia with a completely unrelated claimclaims that he photoshopped images of her face onto naked porn So at absolutely no point was she ever nude or had her nude photos shared? That you're still going after you back up exactly what I've said is just sad. It is irrelevant. It's not revenge porn if there are no nude photos of you. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/16 04:38 AM |
| 0 | Just found this. Some idiot is trying to push for those absurd "revenge porn" laws in Australia with a completely unrelated claimShe literally does not mention nude photos and then specifies these laws should protect her against people coming around due to fake ads. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/16 03:58 AM |
| 2 | Just found this. Some idiot is trying to push for those absurd "revenge porn" laws in Australia with a completely unrelated claim"images of me are online..." In reference to photographs of her face. At no point does "nude" ever come up. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/16 03:40 AM |
| 1 | Just found this. Some idiot is trying to push for those absurd "revenge porn" laws in Australia with a completely unrelated claimIt doesn't specify any porn at all. Her claim of "revenge porn" is her (likely made up) story of him harassing her with ads. That's not porn. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/16 03:27 AM |
| 1 | Just found this. Some idiot is trying to push for those absurd "revenge porn" laws in Australia with a completely unrelated claimDon't the already have laws covering this related to harassment? Yep. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/16 03:26 AM |
| 3 | Man charged after his newborn tests positive for amphetamines and opiates - because he didn't stop his pregnant girlfriend from doing drugs (no charges against her)He... Has no legal agency over her body Has no legal agency over the fetus And yet he still... Limited her finances to protect the child (despite this being considered a crime of "domestic abuse") Told authorities Told the hospital She even told the hospital Yet fucking somehow he is at fault? Somehow he didn't do anything to stop her despite doing everything he legally could? Shut the fuck up. | /r/PussyPass | 03/03/16 04:48 AM |
| 4 | Are we hypocrites if we don't acknowledge and shun the bad parts of our movement?And once you provide examples of your ridiculous nonsense, then you'll have a point. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 01:29 AM |
| 1 | Are we hypocrites if we don't acknowledge and shun the bad parts of our movement?So strange that you don't provide any examples. It's almost like the same bullshit we hear every single time. No, sorry, people who lie (blatantly) about the Men's Rights Movement to the point they have to invent problems with us and claim those who literally say they aren't MRA's represent the MRM do not get to decide what we are. Especially when they refuse to provide any examples of us acting badly. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 01:27 AM |
| 1 | Iran executes men of entire villageWhich is terrible. Once they provide any proof it happened. So far it's someone saying they heard someone mention it but they have no idea what the town was called, what area it's in, when it happened or even if it happened. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 10:41 AM |
| 8 | During his Oscar presentation, Joe Biden made it a point to say that men are also victims of sexual assault!The ONLY reason they allowed 50 sexual assault victims onto the stage is politics. Do we have a list of who was on stage yet? Given the lies they were pushing, i'm half expecting a few of them to be some of the false rape accusations we've seen lately. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 10:06 AM |
| -1 | Joe Biden at the Oscars: "Too many women AND MEN on and off campuses are victims of sexual abuse"Why pushing the refuted "college rape epidemic" bullshit that has been extremely destructive to male students. We don't want token men either. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 10:04 AM |
| 8 | During his Oscar presentation, Joe Biden made it a point to say that men are also victims of sexual assault!Fucking so? He and Gaga were up there pushing the thoroughly refuted college rape "epidemic" bullshit that is currently destroying the lives of male students. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 09:55 AM |
| 1 | Why does society praise single mothers so much yet villainise Nice Guys, and equally mock single dads?expect sex for it I'd say that if you think unrequited romantic feelings equates to them "expecting sex", that's your own insecurities showing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/02/16 11:25 AM |
| 1 | Why does society praise single mothers so much yet villainise Nice Guys, and equally mock single dads?"Nice guys" are not guys who are nice, they are guys who call themselves nice. It seems the only people using the term "Nice Guys" like that are the very women who put people into the Friendzone in the first place and then deflect the criticism of what they know is themselves onto "jerks" who they then claim are the nice guy. It's almost overwhelmingly not nice guys that are saying they are in the Friendzone. It's everyone else who sees that they're in there that point it out. Which is why it's … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/02/16 11:05 AM |
| 2 | "I'm asking people to vote no 1 for me not because I'm a woman but on my merits. However I believe one of those merits is that I'm a woman" - Irish politician standing in the upcoming general election.Someone needs to crop out her face and put it on the History Channels aliens guy. "I'm not saying you should vote for me because I'm a woman...but you should vote for me because I'm a woman" | /r/MensRights | 25/02/16 02:53 AM |
| 5 | The fact that this case is so open-shut and people still support Kesha shows we have a long way to goWhat's. fucked up is the amount of people trying to claim "why would she lie" for this case. She literally has millions in debt and contract requirements tied up to her being able to cut herself from this. It's a massive monetart incentive to lie. Yet "there's no way she would drag herself through the mud for this". The fuck. She has complete support and is getting hundreds of thousands of dollars in free donations as well as millions in a debt contract. People kill for less and lie about rape f… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/16 01:24 AM |
| 26 | "Here's a friendly reminder" - Feminists are insanely sexist and racistWomen do not lack rights in the Western world in comparison to men, while men do in comparison to women. The only thing that comes close is abortion. But that is a religious issue, one that is overwhelmingly opposed by women and not men. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/16 12:35 PM |
| 10 | Kesha swore under oath in 2011 deposition that Dr. Luke did not sexually abuse herpeople can lie about not being raped. And that's super. Problem comes when she has absolutely no evidence to prove her claims on TOP of... Directly denying those claims under oath Having a huge monetary motive to lie | /r/MensRights | 21/02/16 10:45 AM |
| 5 | Robert downey Jr calls feminism 'makebelieve' after he talks about his manhoodSee Lucy. Superhero We lost 10% of our brain watching that. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/16 12:31 PM |
| 9 | Gloria Steinem, who called Bernie Sanders an "honorary woman" when he opposed a female Republican, now flips and claims that all those women supporting Sanders are only doing it because they want to sleep with boys who support him...Yeah, always thought that was some ridiculous conspiracy theory but it's pretty fucked up that it's true. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/16 02:13 AM |
| -4 | I've been seeing this absurd anti-MRA post around recently. Here's a quick and thorough debunking of it, hope you enjoy.Next time don't complain when something you complain about is explained for you. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/16 06:19 AM |
| -5 | I've been seeing this absurd anti-MRA post around recently. Here's a quick and thorough debunking of it, hope you enjoy.You could complain at me, That's one hell of a sad reply. You said you were lost and I just described what is already specifically shown and now you're whinging about "complaining". Don't complain that you are lost if you don't want it explained. Especially when it's directly shown. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/16 04:21 AM |
| -3 | I've been seeing this absurd anti-MRA post around recently. Here's a quick and thorough debunking of it, hope you enjoy.beyond lost in finding the image you're debunking It's the dead center image that EVERY single outside image is DIRECTLY linking to the specific part of the post it associates with. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/16 02:57 AM |
| 0 | Feminists now pushing "Bernie Bros", an attempt to paint any supporter of Bernie Sanders (without knowing anything about them) as sexist misogynistic assholesThe cabinet is pretty well-rounded with talent and experience The cabinet was specifically chosen to exclude men and place in half as women. Dismissing that blatant sexism because they aren't running the country into the ground first day is ridiculous. Not to mention that we don't know if they are more qualified than potential male cabinet members because of the sexist hiring. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/16 11:52 PM |
| 6 | Feminists now pushing "Bernie Bros", an attempt to paint any supporter of Bernie Sanders (without knowing anything about them) as sexist misogynistic assholesAs much as I don't like Trump, it's pathetic all the quotes I've seen from feminists to show he's a "misogynist". They're all quotes of him directly attacking a particular individual as that individual, not against women or as an attack on them because they are women. It's absurd. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/16 11:48 PM |
| 1 | Canadian feminists block creation of on campus center to provide counselling and support for men.Look at that rape crisis center for men that was finally allowed. Nothing was taken from women, women were still treated there and none of those "pesky MRA's" caused any trouble. And yet they still opposed it. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/16 12:15 AM |
| 2 | Bill Cosby wins defamation caseOh gosh, the /r/MensRights sub supports due process and thinks men should be legally able to defend themselves against a violent female who has physically attacked them? Those MONSTERS! | /r/MensRights | 25/01/16 02:28 AM |
| 2 | Bill Cosby wins defamation case50 now. They're claiming a black man was one of the most prolific serial rapists in the USA, during the 70's, of white women. And the vast majority of these claimed rapes occurred in public or high traffic areas. And the police were apparently falling over themselves to not charge a black famous guy for such crimes during the 70's. But not a SINGLE woman can provide even the remotest shred of evidence for the massive serial rape spree. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/16 12:48 AM |
| 1 | This woman 'beat up her husband with nunchucks because he refused her sex'Back to SRS, you sad shit. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/16 12:38 AM |
| 3 | How not to make an argument for SJW culture - Strawman: 1 Feminists: 0Someone needs to make a Anti-Feminism Poe video of this using the exact word for word statements. Watch feminists freak out and claim it's "strawmanning feminism" before they realize where it came from. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/16 12:22 PM |
| 1 | How not to make an argument for SJW culture - Strawman: 1 Feminists: 0What's wrong with the strawmans points? | /r/MensRights | 20/01/16 11:54 AM |
| 1 | How not to make an argument for SJW culture - Strawman: 1 Feminists: 0Pretty much. They tried to strawman their opposition and ended up giving their strawman great points while making themselves out to be the villain. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/16 10:42 AM |
| 3 | Social justice warriors angry with Chris Gayle for flirting with a reporter should remember Maria Sharapova did it firstYou don't even need to remember that to show their blatant hypocrisy. Mel McLaughlin HERSELF asked a co-worker (Gayle didn't even work with McLaughlin, which makes this worse) out for a drink a WEEK later after she had Gayle fired for his polite joke. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/16 05:10 AM |
| 2 | HuffingtonPost flat out lies again and claims a troll Facebook page is now somehow an "MRA group" with literally nothing at all to back that bullshit up with. It's amazing no-one ever seems to actually provide an example of these elusive misogynist MRA's we always hear about.Can confirm. Lonely neckbeard virgin with, like, 8 necks. [fedoras] | /r/MensRights | 18/01/16 11:31 AM |
| 2 | HuffingtonPost flat out lies again and claims a troll Facebook page is now somehow an "MRA group" with literally nothing at all to back that bullshit up with. It's amazing no-one ever seems to actually provide an example of these elusive misogynist MRA's we always hear about.they caught their shit before your did That's a pretty pathetic defense considering it was known and obviously a troll at the time and they still also managed to include "MRA group" based on absolutely nothing. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/16 04:56 AM |
| 6 | /r/science OP carefully crafts a narrative that men are rapists, I point out that rapists could also be women. OP then carefully replies with a statement that appears to imply that I simply didn't read thoroughly enough, even though he is the one with the information and "forgot" to mention it!Probably post this over at /r/SubredditCancer | /r/MensRights | 18/01/16 12:25 AM |
| 4 | Consensual sex is rape if you regret it. And if you ask whether or not it's rape (as apparently the default is to automatically assume it's rape) that means you're a rape apologist as no-one should question if it was rape - by Clementine Fordfinally worn down Nagging for sex isn't rape. She giving someone consensual pity sex does not make him a rapist just because she wants to regret it the next day. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/16 07:29 AM |
| 0 | Emma Watson might actually be a Sociopath.It's statutory rape No, it's an unbacked, unverified, evidence lacking claim that was made decades later. That she isn't even sure if she was 15 or 16 or even 17 (as she herself states there's a gap between 15 and 18) is not only showing how dubious the claim is but your hilarious attempt to claim a 16 year old is "statutory rape" is even more pathetic. Sorry, it appears you feminists can't use "listen and believe" here. You'll need to actually provide evidence of the rape claim before you can s… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/16 03:43 AM |
| -4 | Emma Watson might actually be a Sociopath.Where feminism is the largest sexist and bigoted ideology currently in the West. It's pretty damn hilarious you idiots think feminism isn't an issue while posting on the sub that documents their issues. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/16 03:39 AM |
| -7 | Emma Watson might actually be a Sociopath.And anyone wondering why this thread is being so heavily brigaded by users who never post here: Feminists are raging from CircleBroke and SRS and trying to brigade. Edit: And downvoting this to -3 in 9 minutes is kinda proving that you feminist idiots are brigading. Durp. Try to be less obvious. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/16 02:56 AM |
| 1 | Emma Watson might actually be a Sociopath.but he still fucked a 14 year old while he was in his twenties. At least you feminist idiots, yes we know you're not from here and are brigading from CircleBroke, have stopped claiming she was "13". Her claim was she was 15 or 16. And those claims are completely unbacked by any remote evidence. An ex-groupie claiming decades later she had sex with Bowie while possible 15 is not evidence of rape. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/16 02:55 AM |
| -11 | Emma Watson might actually be a Sociopath.Exactly. She's already trying to claim that the criticism of using his death to push feminism is "proof you need feminism" and "sexism against women. And now... She's just changed her Facebook photo to her feminist HeForShe campaign only a few hours ago. I can see a lot of SJW's trying to play this down as "unrelated", so i'll point out... She hasn't changed her photo since SEPTEMBER 2014, over a YEAR ago, with absolutely no reason to change it now other than her already desperate attempt to pus… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/16 02:52 AM |
| 1 | "Dads: Don’t congratulate yourselves on your feminism" - A daily reminder that feminists don't support men, let alone feminist menIt's strange how most feminists come from fatherless homes, just like most criminals do. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/16 01:45 AM |
| 1 | Is it sexist against men? Apparently nothing is and "lol male tears", even though they list shit men experience, women don't or are nonexistent. Feminists once again remind us why we don't need feminism - from The Guardian and First Dog on the MoonSatire The author doesn't think so. The author considers this true. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/16 06:08 AM |
| 1 | Never one to not kick a man while he's (dead in this case) down: Feminists begin pushing false and unbacked rape allegations against recently deceased David Bowie. A rape claim that he was found innocent of in COURT and an ex-groupie making unfounded/unbacked "child" rape claims.First wave feminism got women the right to vote. Nope, workers unions and suffragists did. Suffrogettes, from which feminism arose, set back the vote for women by decades. Suffragists only gained ground for women getting the vote immediately after feminist suffrogettes stopped their violence. And this is even ignoring the fact they were racists who bombed and committed arson against innocent people and businesses and the fact the reason men were getting the vote was because they had to go to war… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/16 11:37 PM |
| 1 | Never one to not kick a man while he's (dead in this case) down: Feminists begin pushing false and unbacked rape allegations against recently deceased David Bowie. A rape claim that he was found innocent of in COURT and an ex-groupie making unfounded/unbacked "child" rape claims.The groupie is believable In absolutely no way is she believable. Doing an interview decades after the fact, more than likely for a large sum of money, as Bowie is dying of cancer and bringing up a contradictory, vague and dubious claim that she then backs by saying "I totally hung out with these other famous people, that proves me and Bowie did it when I was underage" is not even remotely believable. not at all inclined to press charges So her not pressing charges, despite her not being require… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/16 12:14 PM |
| 3 | Pushing Affirmative Consent - USC students required to detail sexual history before registering for classesThe woman is awake, conscious, casually talking and it specifically states her issue is that her body is trying to "process" the alcohol. She is drunk but not incapacitated or unconscious. Being drunk does not mean you cannot give consent to sex. The image shows her questioning whether or not she wants to and him then saying "don't you trust me". Her consenting to sex after that is not rape. The pictures then immediately skip the part where she was about to have sex while awake to "lol she was p… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/16 12:23 AM |
| 3 | Pushing Affirmative Consent - USC students required to detail sexual history before registering for classesIt's pretty pathetic people are trying to justify this with "oh but you can just not answer the question". Makes about as much sense as saying "it's okay to have prayer in school, you're allowed to just not actually pray when you're required to take prayer time". It's mandatory. That you can fuck around on the questions does not stop it being mandatory. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/16 12:05 AM |
| 2 | Rape-Hoaxing Millionaire Lena Dunham At Rally For Front-Running Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton, Also A Multi-Millionaire: 'Our Country Has So Much Hatred Toward Successful Women'If Bernie doesn't get in, Trump is your next bet. Not because he isn't a piece of shit but because everyone knows he's a piece of shit. His mistakes and corruption and terrible policies will be seen by everyone and undone within the next election. Hilary is just as fucked up as Trump but has the manipulative evil to implement country ruining policies that will favour her crony friends, set back equal rights and cause extreme issues for the US and the entire world for decades to come. It's the di… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/16 01:59 AM |
| 2 | Rape-Hoaxing Millionaire Lena Dunham At Rally For Front-Running Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton, Also A Multi-Millionaire: 'Our Country Has So Much Hatred Toward Successful Women'If you're throwing every connection, bribe, shouting down with SJW tactics and marketing agency at your masturbatory self product and you still can't self-sustain that image because it continues to fall and burn at every turn, it's not a success. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/16 01:54 AM |
| 1 | Company creates hit piece on men's movement for the BBC then uses fraudulent DMCA claims to remove all criticism from Youtubethere is no "fair use" under uk copyright legislation There is for educational and political purposes. And art. On top of which, YouTube is in the US. The UK laws don't apply. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/16 11:26 PM |
| 2 | Just a warning: Looks like a major false rape allegation incoming for the start of 2016.They never do. But they'll sure as hell kick and scream rather than face reality. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/16 12:34 PM |
| 2 | Just a warning: Looks like a major false rape allegation incoming for the start of 2016.THEY'RE JUST STARTING A CONVERSATION! | /r/MensRights | 10/01/16 12:15 PM |
| 1 | Flow chart that explains rape. Think this might be good as a reaction sometimes.consent can be withdrawn at any moment No, you can't withdraw consent after the fact. Once sex is done it cannot be rape, you can't retroactively withdraw consent. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/16 01:36 AM |
| 1 | Flow chart that explains rape. Think this might be good as a reaction sometimes.Sorry, we don't consider one gender at fault like you feminists do. Nothing in that charge blames the woman unless they are directly at fault. If you consent to sex, you can't retract that after the fact. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/16 09:51 AM |
| 2 | Flow chart that explains rape. Think this might be good as a reaction sometimes.Except the use of force and violence Which is not occurring if they do not know about it. You're a bit of a dense little moron aren't you. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/16 09:49 AM |
| 3 | Flow chart that explains rape. Think this might be good as a reaction sometimes.Nope, the law doesn't work that way. Yes, it does. There is no law that states that drunk sex equates to rape for either party, even if one of the parties is completely sober. The only specifications is regarding being unconscious or incapacitated because of that intoxication, not being drunk. You are still able to consent or deny consent while drunk. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/16 09:19 AM |
| 8 | Feminists, who were the ones defending mass immigration and a major reason the Cologne incident was censored, now blame men as a sex for it and are demanding a curfew for all men#KillAllMen | /r/MensRights | 09/01/16 09:07 AM |
| 12 | Durham University student accused of rape tells court his alleged victim sent him pictures of her breasts AFTER they had sexThey're still trying to claim Mattress Girl was raped. These people have no fucking clue. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/16 08:08 AM |
| 1 | First it was #KillAllMen, then #MaleTears and now it's #WasteHisTime2016 - Boy, feminists sure support men tooThose people are not feminist in any kind they're fucking psychopaths So...feminists? | /r/MensRights | 09/01/16 02:57 AM |
| 2 | First it was #KillAllMen, then #MaleTears and now it's #WasteHisTime2016 - Boy, feminists sure support men tooNo, feminists are. Women as a sex are not responsible for these daft, vindictive misandrist cunts. That these feminists are women doesn't change them being a minority. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/16 02:55 AM |
| 9 | News outlets falsely accuses Men's Right Activists of trying to Boycott Star Wars: Force AwakensEven when feminists were the Patriarchy it was still MRA's! /s | /r/MensRights | 07/01/16 04:39 AM |
| 15 | News outlets falsely accuses Men's Right Activists of trying to Boycott Star Wars: Force Awakensthen drop the crazy act and be reasonable So now you're just spouting off fallacies. Sorry, no, RoK literally states they are not MRA's, have written multiple articles trashing MRA's and the MRM and even articles about how they are not MRA's. That you try to push that refuted, blatantly lying narrative and claim it's MRA's that are acting crazy is just outright bullshit. that most of the batshit-crazy Feminazi sites are actually run by the radicalized MRAs Hahaha, holy shit. You couldn't be any … | /r/MensRights | 07/01/16 04:27 AM |
| 8 | News outlets falsely accuses Men's Right Activists of trying to Boycott Star Wars: Force AwakensNo, please show us where Return of Kings states they are MRA? You're little pitchfork bullshit means little in relation to feminists trying to stop men getting equal rights by demonizing those fighting for them. Show us where RoK are MRA's? | /r/MensRights | 07/01/16 03:50 AM |
| 11 | News outlets falsely accuses Men's Right Activists of trying to Boycott Star Wars: Force AwakensSounds like someone who is actively trying to ruin MRA's reputation They have FLAT OUT STATED THEY ARE NOT MRA. People need to stop pushing this nonsense. They aren't making the MRM look bad, this is feminists directly and knowingly lying about the MRM. There's nothing to even suggest they are MRA and they literally state they are not MRA. So the only way for these feminists to have claimed such is to invent it and deliberately lie. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/16 03:07 AM |
| 42 | News outlets falsely accuses Men's Right Activists of trying to Boycott Star Wars: Force Awakensreported the positions of wacky feminist blogs No, this is not a "wacky MRA" blog either. Return of Kings literally states they are not MRA's. At no point do they claim to be MRA and in fact repeatedly point out they are not, while writing articles mocking the MRM. Don't fall into the trap feminists are pushing. This isn't a No True Scotsman, this is feminist knowingly and deliberately lying about MRA's. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/16 03:05 AM |
| 23 | News outlets falsely accuses Men's Right Activists of trying to Boycott Star Wars: Force AwakensNo, fuck that. Return of Kings SPECIFICALLY states they are NOT MRA and write articles all the time about how shit the MRM is. This isn't even a twisting of facts, this is a blatant and deliberate lie. A flat out lie told knowingly and directly. They can't even mistaken this for an MRA site, so they had to invent it. Which requires forethought. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/16 03:02 AM |
| 1 | A reminder of why we can't ignore men's rights in cases like Bill Cosby due to "bad PR": WIthout a conviction, with ALL claims lacking any and all evidence, this has caused the statute of limitations for rape accusations to be raised from 4 years to 20 YEARSminor infraction There are statutes of limitations for torture. Which is far worse than rape. Minor infractions have nothing to do with the statute of limitations. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/16 12:02 AM |
| 1 | A reminder of why we can't ignore men's rights in cases like Bill Cosby due to "bad PR": WIthout a conviction, with ALL claims lacking any and all evidence, this has caused the statute of limitations for rape accusations to be raised from 4 years to 20 YEARSThere are even attempts to deny accused the right to face their accuser. But only for rape, not any other crime. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/16 12:00 AM |
| 15 | A reminder of why we can't ignore men's rights in cases like Bill Cosby due to "bad PR": WIthout a conviction, with ALL claims lacking any and all evidence, this has caused the statute of limitations for rape accusations to be raised from 4 years to 20 YEARSFalse rape allegations in the justice system already heavily place burden on the accused to prove their innocence instead of being found guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Placing decades between you and the claimed incident leaves you with absolutely no way to disprove the claim. And that's not including not being given bail or not being able to afford it, along with a lack of speedy trial. Cosby himself is only not in prison right now because he could pay $1 million dollars for bail and this tria… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/15 08:14 AM |
| 5 | A reminder of why we can't ignore men's rights in cases like Bill Cosby due to "bad PR": WIthout a conviction, with ALL claims lacking any and all evidence, this has caused the statute of limitations for rape accusations to be raised from 4 years to 20 YEARSThen you don't understand why we maintain rights like this or what is at stake for due process. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/15 08:09 AM |
| -1 | Arrest Warrant Issued for Bill Cosby60 children. 60! Clearly that many people proved the daycare was a satanic witch front for child rape. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/15 06:06 AM |
| 2 | How Reddit took on its own users – and won. And we get a mention along with some other really awful subreddits - "Among the many unsavoury communities on Reddit are a number of virulently misogynist groups, from the men’s rights movement…"Men's rights has it's share of misogynists Problem is that they never seem able to actually provide examples. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/15 04:03 AM |
| 1 | How Reddit took on its own users – and won. And we get a mention along with some other really awful subreddits - "Among the many unsavoury communities on Reddit are a number of virulently misogynist groups, from the men’s rights movement…""We killed the rebelling peasants! Nissan!" It's amazing these people still think they're "punching up". | /r/MensRights | 31/12/15 04:02 AM |
| 1 | Blame your husband to get a lighter sentence: 'I was in an abusive and controlling relationship': Westfield bomb-maker's wife tries to blame her husband in begging letter to judge - but she still gets 25 year minimum, while he gets 27 yearsThat's speculation. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/15 03:59 AM |
| -1 | Arrest Warrant Issued for Bill CosbyCharged with a crime without any evidence whatsoever. Amazing. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/15 01:31 AM |
| 4 | Once again the very idea that male genital mutilation should be illegal is dismissed and defended in /r/WorldNews with "womyn have it worse/not the same", despite the removal of the clitoral hood being exactly biologically equivalentThe term biological equivalent is too vague You can't be any more fucking specific than LITERAL DIRECT BIOLOGICAL EQUIVALENT. if I say No, you apologist idiot, strawmen have nothing to do with it. It is literally the biological equivalent. It's what the foreskin forms from. It's comparing male nipples to female nipples and you pathetically trying to deflect that by going "but what about the vulva". What an absolutely nonsense post. There's no vague wording, there's no analogy, it's the DIRECT bi… | /r/MensRights | 30/12/15 06:34 AM |
| 6 | Once again the very idea that male genital mutilation should be illegal is dismissed and defended in /r/WorldNews with "womyn have it worse/not the same", despite the removal of the clitoral hood being exactly biologically equivalentbut this isn't true. Yes, it is. It's literally the biological equivalent. It's what is formed in place on a female, where on a male it forms the foreskin of the penis. It is factually and literally the direct biological equivalent. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/15 06:05 AM |
| 1 | Serious Crime Bill change will target men who 'emotionally bully' wivesJudging from the pictures included in the article, it will apply just as much to female spousal bullies. They also said the Duluth model wouldn't deliberately only target men as well. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/15 04:13 AM |
| 1 | TwoX user hears loud domestic argument in upstairs apartment, calls the cops because "I was genuinely scared for this woman"I'd be loathe to call the police even if I heard the guy getting attacked. Just because the police would then arrest him, even though he's a victim. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/15 01:31 PM |
| 8 | TwoX user hears loud domestic argument in upstairs apartment, calls the cops because "I was genuinely scared for this woman"Holy shit, that hilariously /r/ThatHappened top post: A few years ago, our downstairs neighbors, a former professional boxer and his girlfriend, got into it with each other. At one point, she was screaming "stop" and "help". My husband and I called 911. After the police came, he stopped attacking her and focused on finding out who call the police on him. I could hear every word he yelled. I watched as the man walked to every house surrounding ours, banged on the doors and eventually came home. H… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/15 01:29 PM |
| 1 | Vera Baird, a British 'Police Commissioner', puts out a Christmas message implying that men who budget their finances carefully are trying to "economically abuse" their partnersI am. Want to organize something and post it up on the front page? Maybe mods could sticky. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/15 10:35 PM |
| 1 | Feminist politicians once again try to take revenge out on the entire male gender as "payback" for what some men and a significant chunk of women lobbied forObtuse to the last. Oh, you're still going? Sorry, no, i'm not a bunch of people still. Complaining after the fact once you realized you were downvoted a bunch isn't giving you an argument here. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/15 12:38 PM |
| 2 | German federal court rules woman can retroactively revoke consent to making a sex tape with ex-partner; orders that the man must destroy all photos and videos containing her image.non-written consent The consent was given when she allowed him to take and keep the photo. You can't magically add on specifications to that consent with your feelings, especially not after the fact. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/15 08:02 AM |
| 3 | German federal court rules woman can retroactively revoke consent to making a sex tape with ex-partner; orders that the man must destroy all photos and videos containing her image.She is enforcing the terms of the consent. Wow. That's one of the most absurd attempts to justify this yet. She is retroactively revoking consent. You don't get to go back and change contracts without the approval of both parties, so why the hell would you think it's okay when there isn't a contract to begin with? | /r/MensRights | 23/12/15 06:07 AM |
| 5 | The Year in Male Tears | VICE | United StatesGone Girls creator received a bunch of shit from feminists raging that a woman was portrayed as evil. She told them to go fuck themselves. Now they're claiming Gone Girl totally supports them. It's as moronic as when they claimed Cercei was a "stronk independant womyn" to be admired as a feminist idol. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/15 02:46 AM |
| 11 | Salon's latest racist, sexist screed: "White men must be stopped"What about aqueducts? "What have white people ever done for us?" | /r/MensRights | 23/12/15 02:41 AM |
| 1 | Feminist politicians once again try to take revenge out on the entire male gender as "payback" for what some men and a significant chunk of women lobbied foryou're habit of downvoting!!! Yes, now I'm magically 5 people. went from 1 to 0 Amazing. You made the original claim a while after you were already downvoted to -2 and now you're still trying to claim it was me almost a day later when you're -4 All this because you were called out on your sexist idiocy. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/15 11:57 PM |
| -1 | Woman uses car to attack dozens of people in Las Vegas."N-no YOU are the SJW!" You're not even trying now. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/15 12:56 PM |
| -1 | Woman uses car to attack dozens of people in Las Vegas."I...I'm not a SJW! J-just look at my post history!" | /r/MensRights | 22/12/15 06:40 AM |
| -1 | Woman uses car to attack dozens of people in Las Vegas.MRA STORMFRONT!!! I mean really, you SJW idiots could at least try to be a little less obvious. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/15 05:36 AM |
| 0 | Woman uses car to attack dozens of people in Las Vegas.Try that fallacy somewhere else. We're not denying your ability to discuss male criminals on other subs, like feminists do when people point out International Men's Day is blatantly attacked, ignored and denied a voice. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/15 02:47 AM |
| 1 | Feminist politicians once again try to take revenge out on the entire male gender as "payback" for what some men and a significant chunk of women lobbied foractually real sexism You're actually pushing the "you can't be sexist against men" idiocy IN /r/MensRights? I'd sad the deliberate targetting of men solely because they are men with a legal bill by multiple feminist politicians is ACTUALLY sexist. That you think directly attacking men for being male, as this politician has stated she doesn't think viagra is a problem, is the same thing as religious lobby groups, who are split with men and a significant majority of women claiming abortion is murd… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/15 01:18 AM |
| 2 | Feminist politicians once again try to take revenge out on the entire male gender as "payback" for what some men and a significant chunk of women lobbied forI take it you're one of those people who downvotes anyone you disagree with. You're one of those idiots who thinks -2 means i'm downvoting you three times instead of, oh, 3 people thinking your nonsense doesn't attribute to discussion aren't you? | /r/MensRights | 21/12/15 09:52 PM |
| 3 | Feminist politicians once again try to take revenge out on the entire male gender as "payback" for what some men and a significant chunk of women lobbied forThe law has literally no chance of being passed. It's a media stunt. That you still think this is an argument is fucking ridiculous. Blatant legal sexism by government officials against men isn't "super fun okay" because they "didn't mean it", you dense idiot. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/15 03:08 PM |
| 3 | Feminist politicians once again try to take revenge out on the entire male gender as "payback" for what some men and a significant chunk of women lobbied forwould do well to stay as far away from it as possible. Take that bullshit somewhere else. We have no sway one way or the other regarding abortion. This is directly about deliberate sexism against men for the actions of a distinct minority ideological lobby that has more women in it than men. It doesn't matter how much "oppresshun!" these feminist idiots think they're under, that does NOT give them free range to then attack men with blatantly misandrist laws. That people keep trying to use this "… | /r/MensRights | 21/12/15 02:38 PM |
| 5 | Feminist politicians once again try to take revenge out on the entire male gender as "payback" for what some men and a significant chunk of women lobbied forThe restrictions in her state have become pretty ridiculous. So lets just be sexist against men in order to seek revenge. Yeah, great justification. She is aware her bill is insane and not going to pass So she's wasting tax payers money and being deliberately sexist? At what fucking point in your shitposting this repeatedly around the thread did it not click for you that this is not a defense of her bullshit? Did you forget where you were? That "oh it's prooobably not going to pass, that makes t… | /r/MensRights | 21/12/15 12:32 PM |
| 7 | Feminist politicians once again try to take revenge out on the entire male gender as "payback" for what some men and a significant chunk of women lobbied forIt even implies that she knows it's not going to get passed. I really don't think deliberately wasting taxpayers money in order to be sexist against men is any better... | /r/MensRights | 21/12/15 08:34 AM |
| 89 | Male student expelled for rape after a girl "withdrew consent" for a blowjob she was giving him while he was passed out. His rapist "withdrew her consent" while he continued to be unconscious and he was expelled for rape. Let that sink in.http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/12/16/new-trial-ordered-for-man-imprisoned-for-28-years-woman-dreamed-he-raped-her/ | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/15 05:50 AM |
| 55 | Male student expelled for rape after a girl "withdrew consent" for a blowjob she was giving him while he was passed out. His rapist "withdrew her consent" while he continued to be unconscious and he was expelled for rape. Let that sink in.It says he blacked out. Not that he was unconscious or passed out. So despite the repeated context of the situation showing he was either asleep or unconscious, not just forgetful, this is what you take issue with from the article? | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/15 04:36 AM |
| 164 | Male student expelled for rape after a girl "withdrew consent" for a blowjob she was giving him while he was passed out. His rapist "withdrew her consent" while he continued to be unconscious and he was expelled for rape. Let that sink in.Seen the latest news about a guy who was sentenced to decades of prison because a women dreamt he raped her? Shit like this is the pantomime of reality. | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/15 04:35 AM |
| 2 | To anyone wondering why "An Unbelievable Story of Rape" is being pushed everywhere despite occurring in 2009: This is their new narrative to dismiss all the false rape allegations that have happened recently (here is Salons cognitive dissonance on Rolling Stone)It should be noted too that this woman lacked any and all evidence for her claim and he was a complete stranger. Her story was contradictory and unlikely, which an independent prison psychologist later backed. The police dismissed her too quickly but, even as the detective who discovered she wasn't lying states, her story was dubious and alleged victims should be listened to but not automatically believed. The "connections" presented in the original article that the detective figured out had abs… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/15 04:21 AM |
| 3 | FWIW: "Mattress Girl" to participate in TEDx talk on "socially-constructed borders"Fucking BOLD move considering that anything she mentions about a rape or experience with rape will be directly related to the guy she lied about. This is looking good for a defamation suit. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/15 01:16 AM |
| 1 | FWIW: "Mattress Girl" to participate in TEDx talk on "socially-constructed borders""I love Tumblr. Tumblr means that I, or you could write a compelling blog about a topic you love to a receptive audience" This is you right now. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/15 01:13 AM |
| -1 | FWIW: "Mattress Girl" to participate in TEDx talk on "socially-constructed borders"And I'm sure you think the Daily Mail is good too. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/15 01:11 AM |
| 2 | This recent BBC documentary about mens rights has been made and edited in such an unbalanced way that it makes being anti-feminist seem like nazism, and supporting mens rights seem ludicrous. It even makes an 18 year old who speaks with great rationality seem like a delusional extremist.Even their About page states they are not MRA's. | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/15 01:07 AM |
| 2 | This recent BBC documentary about mens rights has been made and edited in such an unbalanced way that it makes being anti-feminist seem like nazism, and supporting mens rights seem ludicrous. It even makes an 18 year old who speaks with great rationality seem like a delusional extremist.extreme wing as a reminder of why some people view MRA's as scary people; some are. Pushing this nonsense isn't making MRA's fit this absurd claim. Roosh V is not an MRA. He has specifically stated he's not an MRA and constantly mocks the MRM. That these feminists can blatantly lie and you still consider it shows an issue with you, not MRA's. | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/15 01:04 AM |
| 3 | This recent BBC documentary about mens rights has been made and edited in such an unbalanced way that it makes being anti-feminist seem like nazism, and supporting mens rights seem ludicrous. It even makes an 18 year old who speaks with great rationality seem like a delusional extremist.The literally picked some of the more extreme views to show as well. No, they didn't pick any views. Roosh blatantly states he's not an MRA and mocks the MRM. The bare fucking minimum standard is that they at least self-identify as an MRA in order to even be considered as an example. They blatantly and knowingly lied to demonize MRA's. | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/15 01:01 AM |
| 7 | This recent BBC documentary about mens rights has been made and edited in such an unbalanced way that it makes being anti-feminist seem like nazism, and supporting mens rights seem ludicrous. It even makes an 18 year old who speaks with great rationality seem like a delusional extremist.The problem is the same for MRAs as for feminism, to a large extent. The complete assholes are the ones that get the most attention. No, fuck that blatant bullshit. Roosh has specifically stated he is not an MRA and thinks the MRM is a joke. The difference between feminists and MRA's is that feminists seem to be the only ones to flat out lie in order to demonize MRA's, while everyone else (including MRA's) use examples of feminists to hack up their claims and criticism of feminism. | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/15 01:00 AM |
| 2 | Ford Motor Company partners with 'Girls Who Code' to encourage female interest in STEM - "Many detractors of programs that focus on a single gender often claim that these programs themselves are discriminatory.However, ...women are oppressed"Revenge discrimination is the biggest reason for continued cycular discrimination. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/15 05:38 AM |
| 2 | Ford Motor Company partners with 'Girls Who Code' to encourage female interest in STEM - "Many detractors of programs that focus on a single gender often claim that these programs themselves are discriminatory.However, ...women are oppressed"because of ancestral wrongs Apart from where... Men still don't have universal suffrage like women do, as they are required to sign up for selective service to be allowed to vote. Women only got the vote a decade after men did. And they were allowed to vote before then as well, if they owned land. Voting has absolutely no relation to their claimed oppression, as women have always been allowed to own businesses and be employed. The technologies and modern study being required wasn't even fucking … | /r/MensRights | 17/12/15 05:35 AM |
| 1 | The U.N. Sent 3 Foreign Women To The U.S. To Assess Gender Equality. (what do you guys think about this, so much about this rubs me the wrong way)Americans are backwards when it comes to abortions Then they can take it up with the women who make a huge chunk of the anti-abortion people. It remains a religious issue, not an "anti-woman" issue. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/15 05:10 AM |
| 5 | Guys, the post here about the girl who said she lied about being raped is false and misleading. The report clearly states she was indeed raped by a stranger who stalked and violently raped other women. The girl was betrayed by her friends who thought she was lying, and the cops believed them.Oh fuck off. Here's the fucking ESSAY that OP is talking about. The first god damn page of it blatantly states that she lied and said it was a dream. It's not until you get the very bottom of the article, after a long assed read, that it details someone was convicted over it. Her story ended up real. But it wasn't believed, as even the detective who discovered the connections states shouldn't have been, because she had absolutely no evidence whatsoever and her story repeatedly changed and contra… | /r/MensRights | 17/12/15 05:07 AM |
| 6 | 35 Non-feminist, misandrist, blatantly lying and downright crazy "Inspiring Feminist Moments From 2015" shows just how desperate feminists are to justify their movementFreebleeding during a marathon was a thing. Smiling is one of the least questionable. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/15 03:37 PM |
| 2 | "Dear dad" - infuriatingly discriminating norwegian short film.Apparently, according to feminists, those are misogynistic remarks because something something gay people are women. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/15 08:16 AM |
| 7 | "Dear dad" - infuriatingly discriminating norwegian short film.And that children calling you names makes them a future rapist. But only if they're male. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/15 08:15 AM |
| 1 | "Dear dad" - infuriatingly discriminating norwegian short film.Just ignore him, guys. Another AgainstMensRights idiot getting their daily screenshot. Apparently they couldn't find anything today. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/15 08:13 AM |
| 16 | 35 Non-feminist, misandrist, blatantly lying and downright crazy "Inspiring Feminist Moments From 2015" shows just how desperate feminists are to justify their movementGotta love the "appropriation" of racial issues and gay marriage being legalized. I mean fucking seriously, feminism is responsible for gay marriage now. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/15 08:07 AM |
| 2 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'Looks like we're being brigaded from SRS. It explains so many non-posters suddenly appearing to scream and dismiss the article completely because of one (still accurate) word in the title rather than address the article or the subject. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/15 07:54 AM |
| -1 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'So you're claiming that a government backed (as this would be required to be in order to have access to the schools) attempt to give every 16 year old student a propaganda book is, by your logic, not going to mean they have to read them? | /r/MensRights | 04/12/15 07:51 AM |
| 1 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'A lot of trolls are screaming "private company" as if it means anything. A private company in Texas also prints the books that Americans use for their schools, this doesn't magically mean the government has nothing to do with school books. Those same trolls keep trying to imply that it's "private", when these books will be given out at all government schools, not private schools. A feminist group is printing the books. They would not be able to give them to every 16 year old student if they were… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/15 07:49 AM |
| 1 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'It's not. It's a private company. OP is full of shit. If you're going to blatantly lie, at least try not to make your strawman so fucking obvious. A private company printing these books means absolutely nothing in relation to these books being given to EVERY 16 year old high school student year in Sweden for ALL government run schools. This group CAN'T give out books to every 16 year old student in schools. In order to do so they require that the GOVERNMENT BACK THEM AND ALLOW IT. So yes actuall… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/15 07:47 AM |
| 1 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'This title is highly inflammatory Please, please do tell us how a government backed (as this would be required to be to be implemented) propaganda effort is somehow not true...despite the article completely backing the title? So far we have a couple of feminist trolls desperately trying to play semantics about the use of one word (which has multiple meanings) in the title to dismiss the entire thread, claiming that somehow a government backed program to give children propaganda books is somehow … | /r/MensRights | 04/12/15 07:41 AM |
| 2 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'No one is being "forced" to read a book by it being handed out for free. A government backed REQUIREMENT that EVERY 16 year old student be give this book* is apparently not requiring them to read it according to your absurd shitposting. That you can't come up with a single argument other than playing semantics is typical feminist bullshit we see here every time some troll comes in to shitpost. That you actually can't come up with anything as to why the title is false other than claiming a govern… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/15 07:39 AM |
| 4 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'According to some of these SRS trolls in this thread, apparently that book wasn't "forced" on students either. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/15 07:35 AM |
| 1 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'There's no difference in reading. By this absurd logic, children are not "forced" to learn mathematics. That "omg chill" and other such idiocy being thrown around desperately trying to play semantics to shut down a completely accurate title and backed article instead of actually addressing the issue is all you people have is pretty telling. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/15 07:34 AM |
| -3 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'because required/forced have very specific meanings. Is the semantics game the only thing you have to back your nonsense? Please, do tell us how a government backed program to give children a propaganda book will not be making them read it? Or will you know try the "the students could choose not to read it, therefore they aren't forced" absurdity? exaggerating This nonsense really isn't working. Everything in the title is correct. Coming in with blatant attempts to downplay it with pathetic sema… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/15 12:07 AM |
| -4 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'make up stuff So your argument is that every 16 year old in Sweden will be given this propaganda book but the title is wrong and "made up" because you think a government backed (as would be required to do this) distribution of books to specifically school students would somehow not be required reading? | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 11:53 PM |
| 2 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'Now now, lets not stoop to the level of feminists. They can buy and read their books all they want but their deranged, sexist ideology has no place in schools. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 11:45 PM |
| -1 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'However, there is no force anywhere Down ignore these users. They continue to spam the thread with this bullshit claim that the title is false because somehow all 16 year old high school students being given this propaganda book is magically no indication they will be made to read them. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:54 PM |
| 0 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'This user is blatantly lying. Their claim it's not true is that, despite everything being correct in the title and backed up in the article, the kids could not read it. Therefore somehow the fact every 16 year old high school student in Sweden being given this propaganda book is "false". | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:51 PM |
| 1 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'So your argument is that high schoolers are all being given a book...and they aren't being expected to read it? | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:48 PM |
| 2 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'Okay, so somehow these nonsense posts are being upvoted despite them being unable to explain how the title is false. They all seem to be relying on the ridiculous claim that high school students refusal to read the book somehow disproves that it's being given to every 16 year old high school student. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:47 PM |
| -3 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'That's a pretty damn misleading title there, OP Amazing this bullshit claim is being upvoted. Please, do tell us how the title isn't correct? The article says that a copy of the book will be distributed to every 2nd year high school student in Sweden Oh boy, you mean every 16 year old in Sweden will get this book in high school? You quote the same as was specifically mentioned in the title and you think this disproves it? Are you relying on semantics? "Oh their not ALL 16"? Because 16 Is the ave… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:43 PM |
| 6 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'Just ignore this user. Their argument for why the title is wrong, despite the article directly supporting it, is that this won't happen the way it's described (including by the feminist minister who is stating it) because "it won't". They then went on to claim actually unfounded shit that will "probably" happen based on their hunch. I think we'll stick to actual claims than your "what ifs" and disparagment of this sub because of one thread. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:36 PM |
| 10 | Every 16 year old high school student in Sweden will now be forced to read the propaganda book 'We Should All Be Feminists'So you were asked where the title is wrong and you gave us "it's not my job to educate you" and "what will probably happen"? Sorry, I think we'll be going by what the article states, which directly backs the title. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:32 PM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeThat's not what OP's source says. Oh, you're still going? Please, do show us in the article where it provides evidence of her claim that she was raped? You know, other than you desperately attempting to pretend that her rape claim is magically proof the claim is true. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 01:44 PM |
| 2 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeIm not repeating feminist talking points, you are conforming to them. Hahahaha, oh boy. that's for the courts to do No, it's not. The burden of proof doesn't magically change from that fallacy either. Prove she was raped. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 11:41 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeIts not my burden of proof. Oooh, sorry, i'm afraid shifting the burden of proof doesn't work either. You're defending her claim. Coming in and going "but I didn't make the claim" doesn't work. You're defending the original claim, that means the burden of proof is on you. So provide evidence she was raped. It's not my job to disprove you. Especially when in industry standards and her own words refute you. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 11:32 AM |
| 2 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeIn not a feminist. And with all the feminist talking points and raging against MRA's on an MRA sub, you're doing a mighty fine job of showing everyone you're not. What you are disputing here Is your repeatedly and deliberate strawmen, after you've been repeatedly shut down regarding them. consenting to vaginal sex doesn't mean Exhibit A. Im not a feminist Suuuuure you're not. She claimed there are witnesses Yet here you are arguing that the people she claimed were "high fiving" over her rape...a… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 11:06 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeShow me the contact! No anal! Again, that's your burden of proof. As you are defending the original claim of rape. So, again, provide evidence. denying it happened That's one hell of a stretch. So now, despite witnesses seeing, the fact they aren't corroborating her claim means they support her claim? Even though, by her own words, they were "high fiving" over her rape, which shows that (according to her own words they saw what happened)? You're really going to have to do better than that. So ag… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 11:00 AM |
| 2 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapePeople as in you Oh, making blatantly false claims yourself now, eh little feminist? Please, do directly quote me where i've said that someone can't be raped on a porn set, can't revoke consent or can't consent to one thing and not another? Go on? is the belief that Sorry, once again that strawman isn't going to work. You're the only one bringing it up, despite it repeatedly being addressed. that working with the same actor means the first incident didn't happen Still blatantly lying with these … | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:51 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeOMG SHOW ME! Show you the industry legal standards? In the very article linked it shows there witnesses as well. So none of that nonsense is going to fly. Sorry little feminist, you are the one who is defending the rape claim. The burden of proof is entirely on you. Provide evidence she was raped. Otherwise the default is that he is innocent. I know men being innocent until proven guilty is a tough thing for you feminists but i'm afraid it's something MRA's tend to respect. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:44 AM |
| 2 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapePeople here are saying you saying that if Ah, now it's "other people". Despite you repeatedly replying to me with that absurd bullshit. You really have run out of arguments, haven't you feminist. Sorry, your continued strawman isn't going to work. Her claims are refuted by video, witness and consent contract evidence. That you still continue to push her word alone as somehow enough evidence to prove she denied consent is really pathetic. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:41 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeAgain you saying that if you agree to vaginal sex and not anal, Yep, seems that no matter how many times you repeat that strawman it's still not giving you an argument. Her claims are refuted by video, witnesses and consent contracts. Yet here you are still demanding we "listen and believe" with your absurd and irrelevant fallacies. This is exactly the sort of thinking feminists say exists That men can never disprove a false rape allegation against them because a womans word is worth more than w… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:38 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeIm not a feminist. No, no, you just continue to spout of the same ridiculous feminist talking points while raging against MRA's...on an MRA sub. Definitely can't be a feminist. No siree. It's simple logic That men cannot disprove rape claims against them even with video footage, witnesses and consent contracts? No, that's illogic. Someone can agree to have sex and still be raped Ah, you really can't come up with any argument at this point other than a strawman no-one has brought up but yourself.… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:35 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapebut none of these women are talking about consent being revoked. That's nice. Problem is that it's according to their own words. Despite the fact they signed contracts stating they consented, had video footage showing they did not revoke or deny that consent and multiple witnesses. The girl in question then slept with her "rapist" later. Your continued desperate attempts to pretend that their word somehow defies actual evidence is precisely the point of this thread. don't contract for anal And t… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:23 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeSo you are saying you can agree to have vaginal sex, then your can be forcibly fucked in the ass Still going with this strawman, you sad little feminist? Strange how you continue to spout off that fallacy even after it's repeatedly addressed. MRA'S PROVING FEMINIST RAPE CULTURE RIGHT Oh boy, i'm sure that's totally going to give you an argument. MRA's point out that her rape allegations are completely unbacked by any remote evidence, in fact being refuted because of witnesses, video and contract… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:19 AM |
| 0 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeAs for the multiple witnesses, who are they? It's in the article. Her own words. The freakin' film crew was there and didn't think it was rape. How about you provide evidence it was rape, since industry legal standards refute her claim and the burden of proof is on her and her defenders. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:09 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeAs if someone cannot be raped on a porn set Now you're just entirely relying on strawmen fallacies, eh? Sorry, that idiocy still isn't going to fly. As i've not once said anything remotely of the sort. Perhaps you'll start screaming "misogyny" next too, hmm? That will hold about as much weight as that hilariously pathetic claim that i've once even remotely said you can't be raped on a porn set. total fallacy Cute, especially when your entire argument is fallacies at this point. You can agree to … | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 10:07 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeTo your standards. Filming you consenting, you signing more than one contract stating you will and have consented (as is industry and legal standard), multiple witnesses against your claim and you then later having sex with your "rapist" again is a standard of proof that anyone would have. By your ridiculous standard a man literally cannot disprove a rape claim against them. blah blah blah but what if a prostitute says one thing and then is forced to do another Let me stop your desperate fucking… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 09:58 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeIm saying arguing that because someone signed a contract to be in a porn film, doesnt mean that person cannot be raped. That's a truly amazing statement. Now if you could show where that contradicts anything in the title, as you claimed, and provide evidence to back up her rape claim...then you'll have a point. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 09:47 AM |
| 0 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeThe claim that a bunch of guys were all high fiving after she was raped on film is more "earnest" to you? Even though she was filmed consenting, signed a contract saying she consented (as is required in the industry) and it's her word vs multiple witnesses? | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 09:44 AM |
| 2 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeI was talking about the OPs confusion as to what rape is. The only one here confused about what rape is would be you. By all possible standards, she was shown to consent. Yet here you are desperately trying to claim that her word "proves" that she was raped. Sorry chump, spouting off ignorant fallacies like "you need consent classes" as you just did isn't going to change the fact that not only is a claim of rape not evidence of that claim but when an entire legal regulation refutes your claim an… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 09:42 AM |
| 1 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeObviously, if someone agrees to sex, and then the person starts doing things against their will And immediately you just show why the title is correct. You're automatically presenting what she is saying is true because of her word alone. While in order to film a porno they need consent forms, witnesses and the film itself showing her not once revoking or denying consent. Her word...against objective evidence. Not including her having sex with James Deen again after this alleged rape. Apparently … | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 09:36 AM |
| 4 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeMy take here isn't that she didn't consent to the scene Which you base entirely on your clear 'listen and believe' beliefs, as you are taking her entirely at her word with no evidence whatsoever. but that Nixon's assertions here are false: So you refuse to provide any evidence for your claim, despite the burden of proof being entirely on you as her claims defender, and somehow I'm the liar and she's correct (even though you have no evidence at all to support your claim)? Sorry, that's still not … | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 05:46 AM |
| 2 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeYou're saying You made the claim he raped her. When asked for evidence you then went on to rant that the video showing she had anal sex is somehow magically proof of her claim she didn't consent to anal sex. Which is still you desperately attempting to play off her claim as proof of her claim. And now you're trying this tactic. Again, provide evidence of your claim. she consented to being fucked in the ass, The video, multiple witnesses and her contract as required by law for that video to be le… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 05:33 AM |
| 5 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeWell, let's see, there's a video of him ramming his cock in her ass A video with multiple witnesses, she doesn't denying consent and she signed contracts stating she consented as required by law showing anal...is proof that she was raped? So, again, you have no evidence for your claim other than her claim? Because a video showing consent that is by all definitions overwhelming proof she consented, by both law and by basic logical standards, is now evidence proving rape? So, by your logic, she co… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 05:22 AM |
| 6 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapec-citation needed Amazing. You made the claim, dumbass. So, again, provide evidence to back your claim that he raped her. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 05:00 AM |
| 5 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeOMG CONSENT You do know which sub you're in, right? A claim of rape is NOT proof of that claim. You were just fucking asked for proof and you instead quoted her claiming rape as evidence of that same claim. Given that she was filmed, had witnesses and signed a contract stating she consented to everything, it's fucking amazing you actually think spouting off "omg here's her saying she was raped" is somehow proof of that claim. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 04:56 AM |
| 3 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapethe claim he did something she didn't consent to, being violent and punching her during a scene Which mysteriously isn't backed in the video of the scene, the consent contracts she's signed, her return to work with him and the witnesses that were there. In what way does that contradict anything I've stated in the title? She is being believed not just from a completely unbacked claim but from a claim that is objectively refuted by the most standard of evidence ANYONE could provide. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 04:53 AM |
| 2 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeI'm sure you have evidence of this claim? | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 04:50 AM |
| 3 | Well, it's official, you can now have your sex act filmed, have witnesses, sign a legal contract stating you consent both before and after filming and STILL be believed if you cry rapeGee, downvoted to 33% in 10 minutes. Could you be a little less obvious? | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 04:36 AM |
| 1 | Thunderf00t: How Feminism destroyed 'New Atheism'This made me actually tear up a bit. That was unexpected. Watching a bright future slowly approaching for the human race, only for it to be shattered by feminist and SJW morons is heartbreaking. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 03:45 AM |
| 8 | Why the "women are never believed when they claim rape" idea is such bullshit: look at how much support someone gets for making a rape claim.We're seeing this with the Stoya/James Deen bullshit right now. A woman claims rape on Twitter months after a breakup, with a post that complains that people aren't already treating him as her rapist even though this Tweet is the FIRST anyone has ever heard of it, despite repeatedly working with him after they've broken up (when the rape was meant to have occurred during the relationship)... And is getting overwhelming support on social media, from fellow stars in the industry, from her own comp… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/15 01:46 AM |
| 3 | Porn star Stoya accuses James Deen of rape; mutual friend knows he's innocent but outlines why she won't defend him.When people say, "Why would a woman lie about rape?" I get so annoyed. That's actually one of the current biggest arguments being used on the Chickflixxx sub to defend her claim. Along with, I shit you not, a huge amount of "what more evidence do we need?" in reply to the downvote brigades posts saying "we shouldn't pass judgement until she provides evidence of her claim". It's fucked up. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/15 12:24 AM |
| 18 | Porn star Stoya accuses James Deen of rape; mutual friend knows he's innocent but outlines why she won't defend him.I'm sure you've got evidence James Deen committed a crime? Hmm? | /r/MensRights | 29/11/15 02:14 PM |
| 51 | Porn star Stoya accuses James Deen of rape; mutual friend knows he's innocent but outlines why she won't defend him.Accusing him a while after they broke up too. And yet apparently there's "no motivation for her to lie". It's pathetic. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/15 02:13 PM |
| 7 | Porn star Stoya accuses James Deen of rape; mutual friend knows he's innocent but outlines why she won't defend him.So another false rape allegation about to hit it big. Sadly there is little in the way of media on his side due to his profession. Hopefully actual evidence is presented that backs her claim or refutes her. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/15 02:11 PM |
| 6 | Clementine Ford already pushing her feminist bullshit to attack white men immediately after Planned Parenthood shooting, despite white men being among victims of this attackThat didn't seem to be the intent of what she said. I don't know why this is being upvoted. Clementine Ford has made it pretty DAMN clear that sexism and racism was what she intended. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/15 10:28 AM |
| 0 | Clementine Ford already pushing her feminist bullshit to attack white men immediately after Planned Parenthood shooting, despite white men being among victims of this attackThe moron was even shooting at passing cars. People who have no relation to his likely anti-abortion motives. Yet apparently this means white men are to blame. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/15 10:19 AM |
| 2 | Australia: Sperm donor laws: Man tracked down by dying daughter backs changes to anonymity rules. Any man who gave a sperm donation with a promise of anonymity can now be identified.Under an agreement of anonymity. Under a direct, government lifetime agreement too. Governments can't renege on contracts like this with businesses or unions, yet they apparently can when it comes to an absolute guarantee of privacy. It's pathetic. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/15 07:28 AM |
| 4 | Men are not monsters: Last week three of my four boys were herded into school-sponsored assemblies and asked to stand, raise their hands and pledge to never, ever hurt a woman. Their female classmates weren’t required to make a similar pledge.As long as you don't kill more than three people over the course of time, you'll be good. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/15 06:42 AM |
| 3 | Australian Media and the absolute saturation of Domestic Violence discussionAustralia. Where the poster child for domestic violence against women gained that position because her mentally ill ex husband killed his son and then himself. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/15 06:38 AM |
| 0 | Feminists show their true colours on Reddit when it comes to male genital mutilation. Now apparently pointing out MGM is 'sexism against women' and 'not comparable'The removal of the clitoral hood is common. And it is completely illegal. Take your faux support somewhere else. Spouting off the same lies as the feminists in that thread holds as much weight as claiming to be a MRA supporter as when they spouted it. Which is zip. Going "oh...but other forms are worse" is the same idiocy that user just shut down. The removal of the clitoral hood is illegal, while it's direct biological equivalent is not. That the best you could do was to latch onto the word "co… | /r/MensRights | 26/11/15 01:29 AM |
| 6 | Feminists show their true colours on Reddit when it comes to male genital mutilation. Now apparently pointing out MGM is 'sexism against women' and 'not comparable'The clitoris functions with just the same level of normality when you removal the clitoral hood. By your logic, should we make FGM legal then? | /r/MensRights | 25/11/15 10:56 PM |
| 6 | Feminists show their true colours on Reddit when it comes to male genital mutilation. Now apparently pointing out MGM is 'sexism against women' and 'not comparable'We need to stop this dam us vs them mentality and work together to stop all forms of mutilation. There is no-one who is against male genital mutilation that isn't completely opposed to female genital mutilation. While the opposite clearly shows that they will dismiss completely, if not outright defend, male genital mutilation. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/15 10:54 PM |
| 2 | Feminists show their true colours on Reddit when it comes to male genital mutilation. Now apparently pointing out MGM is 'sexism against women' and 'not comparable'It was, yes. One of the biggest reasons the ban on MGM was removed originally in Germany a few years ago was because of cries of "anti-semiticism". | /r/MensRights | 25/11/15 10:52 PM |
| 7 | Feminists show their true colours on Reddit when it comes to male genital mutilation. Now apparently pointing out MGM is 'sexism against women' and 'not comparable'But there are plenty of boys that didn't have issues There are plenty of girls that don't either. Your logic falls apart very quickly. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/15 10:49 PM |
| 16 | Feminists show their true colours on Reddit when it comes to male genital mutilation. Now apparently pointing out MGM is 'sexism against women' and 'not comparable'Heh, I see both threads I made on this subject on different subs were hit with the same level of downvoting. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/15 01:42 PM |
| 1 | UPDATE: Utah father whose baby was put up for adoption without his consent returned.....to the mother.That sounds like misogynistic talk right there, citizen. Pick up that child support cheque! | /r/MensRights | 25/11/15 06:02 AM |
| 2 | UK: Woman hits man with ‘End Violence Against Women’ placard, man charged with Criminal Damage for breaking her placardWhere the fuck can I donate to this mans legal aid? | /r/MensRights | 25/11/15 06:01 AM |
| -2 | Remember- most women are good and on our side, even if they only oppose MRAs due to poor perception.No, most women aren't sexist. Most feminists are. Most women, and men, are apathetic about issues regarding sexism and believe anyone "representing" the authority on gendered issues and sexism to be correct on word alone. Problem is that the current established authority is entirely feminist and therefore overwhelmingly sexist, bigoted and female supremacist. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/15 04:26 AM |
| 2 | Why we need feminism...because men are rape supporters and that TOTALLY happened. The sheer level of cognitive dissonance from feminists is astounding.I really wish people would stop misattributing Abraham Lincolns quote to King Henry. | /r/MensRights | 13/11/15 01:28 AM |
| 7 | Despite the pay gap myth being thoroughly refuted, they continue to double-down on their lies with claims children have a pay gap and now technology is sexist against womenThat FIFA thing earlier this year was fucking ridiculous. There was barely over 300k worldwide for the grand final womens football match. Men pull in that number in the lower team threshold for basic games. Yet it was all over the news that women were paid less in sports because of it, despite the fact that the mens finals of FIFA pulled in a BILLION viewers worldwide. The women were overwhelming overpaid in comparison. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 08:38 AM |
| 3 | Why we need feminism...because men are rape supporters and that TOTALLY happened. The sheer level of cognitive dissonance from feminists is astounding.It's just levels of impressive stupidity that the only example you could present was the claim being discussed in which it the anonymous user doesn't even do what you're claiming but says other feminists (with absolutely no evidence) did so. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 08:34 AM |
| 1 | Lorena Bobbitt cuts off husbands penis in 1993. Gets standing ovation from women in Steve Harvey show audience.He probably was a scumbag Fuck off. There has been absolutely nothing presented to show he was in any way at fault. All her claims were refuted, contradictory or constantly changing. At one point she declared that he deserved it because he orgasmed before her and was selfish. There is nothing to show he was abusive or "had it coming". While everything to show she was a narcissistic, self-entitled crazy bitch who justified herself no matter what. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 06:47 AM |
| 2 | Lorena Bobbitt cuts off husbands penis in 1993. Gets standing ovation from women in Steve Harvey show audience.Hahaha, what level of nonsense are you trying to push? MRA's will happily work with self-subscribed feminists if they aren't against equality and don't attack MRA's. That doesn't mean MRA's suddenly think feminism isn't the major hurdle to overcome to get rights for men or that feminism is a vile, misandrist movement. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 06:42 AM |
| 1 | Lorena Bobbitt cuts off husbands penis in 1993. Gets standing ovation from women in Steve Harvey show audience.Only feminists could take a consumer outrage against 5 corrupt male industry members abusing their power and turn it into an attack on not just a woman but all women in the video game industry. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 06:39 AM |
| 11 | Why we need feminism...because men are rape supporters and that TOTALLY happened. The sheer level of cognitive dissonance from feminists is astounding.She has a point No, she fucking doesn't. Feminists have been denying male rape even exists, lobbying against funding for male rape survivors or help, declaring even mentioning male rape is "MRA detailing". They overwhelmingly have not been the ones defending male rape victims, in many cases even fighting against them or celebrating feminist rapists. To declare a minority of anonymous people in a fictional comment section (as strangely enough no feminist can actually show anyone evidence of the c… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 06:20 AM |
| 2 | Despite the pay gap myth being thoroughly refuted, they continue to double-down on their lies with claims children have a pay gap and now technology is sexist against womenReminds me of all the feminists a few years ago showing screen grabs of Google search results as proof the internet is sexist. Until people point out that Google provides results based on your own searches... | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 05:30 AM |
| 2 | Vox Media bans staff from "mansplaining".This is where women feel the need to talk about nothing of interest Ad Nauseam. Let's not stoop to their level and be sexist against a gender. Just define fembleating as where a feminist feels the need to talk about nothing of interest Ad Nauseam. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 05:20 AM |
| 1 | "Shouldn’t gender equity apply to men as well?" The reality behind the Canadian PM's new affirmative action CabinetNo complaining feminists. Amazing isn't it. You give feminists whatever they want, including deliberately appointing women over men in a blatant sexist action and they... Oh wait, they're still complaining. With "this is a good start" and "anyone who disagrees is a misogynist and this is why we need feminism". Giving supremists whatever they want to the point you are defending blatant sexism does tend to make them happy. But the entire point is bowing and asking "may I have another" to the assho… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 04:25 AM |
| 9 | HUGE VICTORY - International Men’s Day Debate on suicide to go ahead!Is the parody of feminists that is called 'Meninism' even more than a year old? That they still think "Meninism" is a real thing because MRA's are gaining ground and they can't disparage them with the term "MRA" anymore is hilarious. But claiming Meninism has even been around for "years", let alone has political power is levels of stupid. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 01:00 AM |
| 1 | Melissa Click, the feminist professor threatening to have journalist Tim Tai physically attacked by screaming for "some muscle over here" from nearby men in the recent viral video, wrote an article also attacking the idea of masculinity titled "Masculinity in Crisis"Replied to the wrong user and/or thread there, buddy. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/15 10:53 PM |
| 4 | Everyday Feminism Comic - 32 types of Anti-FeministsI've posted this in the other thread but here's it again: Here's the exploitable version if anyone wants to change shit up. You'll still need to change the characters hair and write in your own versions but most of the titles can remain. I would suggest, instead of the strawmen these idiots presented, writing the actual deranged statements we've seen from feminists. Shop their face onto the characters with an actual quote and an small archived link to where they've stated it. Something like that… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/15 01:00 PM |
| 1 | Everyday Feminism Comic - 32 types of Anti-FeministsThey name dropped GamerGate for no reason. You're about to see some serious arts and crafts up in this bitch. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/15 12:05 PM |
| 3 | Everyday Feminism Comic - 32 types of Anti-FeministsThat's some half-assed work. The same comic guy created an exact same one for Libertarians years ago in response to the Tea Party, yet here he manages to disparage women who aren't feminists (calling them Good Girls sarcastically), spews a whole bunch of strawmen that don't even relate even to stereotypes of anti-feminists and even manages a game drop and mentions GamerGate for absolutely no reason. Looks like he's run out of creativity if he needs to rip off his own work. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/15 12:03 PM |
| 6 | Melissa Click, the feminist professor threatening to have journalist Tim Tai physically attacked by screaming for "some muscle over here" from nearby men in the recent viral video, wrote an article also attacking the idea of masculinity titled "Masculinity in Crisis"And yes, the police have stepped up patrols due to "serious and violent threats made to Click" Absolutely pathetic. The university also immediately needs to fire her. She threatened and then tried to have a student physically assaulted. That's not just a massive violation of the by-laws but of actual laws as well. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/15 06:32 AM |
| 7 | Melissa Click, the feminist professor threatening to have journalist Tim Tai physically attacked by screaming for "some muscle over here" from nearby men in the recent viral video, wrote an article also attacking the idea of masculinity titled "Masculinity in Crisis"She's going to claim "misogyny" and then fake a bunch of death and rape threats. Calling it now. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/15 05:33 AM |
| 63 | Melissa Click, the feminist professor threatening to have journalist Tim Tai physically attacked by screaming for "some muscle over here" from nearby men in the recent viral video, wrote an article also attacking the idea of masculinity titled "Masculinity in Crisis"Correction: The journalist at the end being threatened by Melissa Click with "muscle" is Mark Schierbecker who filmed the entire thing. Tim Tai is the poor photographer they harass during the original video. Though it's apparent that Melissa Click is the teacher during the video telling other students to assault Tim. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/15 12:12 PM |
| 15 | Men dare to want 5 minutes to relax that's not with their wife or girlfriend? Why, that's problematic misogyny! Because, uh, child brides! And, um, 2 women are killed a week!You'll notice that she constantly complains about everyone wanting her to let her partner come out more, something they would be saying because he uses her as the reason he doesn't come out, and goes on to not actually address that once. Not even dismissing it but just bringing up the problem the friends state and then blaming them for it. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/15 03:00 AM |
| 2 | Fighting school sexism: school launches new feminism curriculum: "The collective also faced opposition in the playground, Stella says. Male students argued that they should form a "men's rights collective" to protect themselves against the feminists."And don't forget 'Feminist Biology' and 'Feminist Math'. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/15 05:15 AM |
| 6 | Boy writes letter asking judge to keep mom in prison. She'll only serve half of a 10yr sentence for stabbing husband in the chest.The disturbing thing is the amount of people in the /r/news thread desperately trying to defend this woman. | /r/PussyPass | 01/11/15 08:24 AM |
| -3 | Stephen Fry quits as host of the BBC show "QI"and is replaced by feminist politician Sandi ToksvigHe "quit". There have been quotas placed on television now in relation to women, despite the fact QI snapped up any women who applied to be on QI, there just weren't any coming up. He's also been getting more publicly pissed off at feminists. He was effectively forced out. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/15 04:21 AM |
| 6 | "The Red Pill" Documentary Extended Sneak PreviewMens Rights in the modern sense grew as an offshoot of pickup artistry back in the early days of the Web. Never go full retard, man. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/15 02:26 PM |
| 3 | "The Red Pill" Documentary Extended Sneak PreviewConsidering the users pushing this and that were currently being brigaded, I'd say the vigorous defense of this shaky film is a little too obvious for something that is at best a "wait and see" rather than the call for unbridled support. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/15 05:57 AM |
| 1 | "The Red Pill" Documentary Extended Sneak PreviewThat is disingenuous. Obviously, the goals are completely different | /r/MensRights | 14/10/15 05:52 AM |
| 1 | THE RED PILL - a documentary filmTake that bullshit somewhere else. Feminists have consistently tried to smear Men's Rights by using examples of Red Pillers and fallaciously conflating the two. Now we have a feminist who made a documentary about Men's Rights and calls it The Red Pill? No, sorry. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/15 05:27 AM |
| 2 | "The Red Pill" Documentary Extended Sneak PreviewWhere is this nonsense coming from? This film has already shown that it's going to be a smear job attempting to conflate the Red Pill with Men's Rights. We have no reason to at all trust it before release, let alone support it's release, especially when a feminist is at the wheel. I'm sure it could totally turn out to not be a biased piece of crap. But we have no reason to think it won't be and every reason to think it will. Why would we support it before release if we already know it's trying t… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/15 05:22 AM |
| 11 | "The Red Pill" Documentary Extended Sneak PreviewYou want to bash them, bash me too, because I LIKE So? Men's Rights has absolutely no relation to the Red Pill, nor PUA's. It's a desperate and pathetic attempt to conflate the two in order to demonize and smear Men's Rights. You liking them means about as much as you liking My Little Pony. Nobody denies you can like both but they are not related. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/15 05:19 AM |
| 4 | "The Red Pill" Documentary Extended Sneak PreviewBecause it's not a documentary. It's a deliberate smear campaign. It's going to be as biased and fraudulent in it's claims as the GamerGate documentary some Anti-GGer made. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/15 05:16 AM |
| 2 | "The Red Pill" Documentary Extended Sneak PreviewWhy the hell would we support a biased documentary clearly attempting to smear Men's Rights by equating it with the Red Pill? | /r/MensRights | 14/10/15 05:14 AM |
| 2 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.You haven't presented any facts Oh, you're running with just flat out ignorance now? Bold move, considering how much you've been shut down so far. Settle down, little SRS wannabe. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 12:57 PM |
| 1 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.unless you personally let it get to you You've clearly taken the facts being presented personally, since you began ranting from the very beginning and continue to. Run along then, since you claim to have no relevance to this thread. But mysteriously I think you might immediately return to continue to spout your frightened nonsense. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 12:38 PM |
| 2 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.you're scared of SRS Still trying that nonsense? No, sorry, pointing out what they're planning to do isn't "being scared". Unlike your continued freakout here over the basic facts. safe space Ah, yes, still pushing that SRS nonsense you've been spouting this entire time. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 12:17 PM |
| 1 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.Oh, you're still going? I'm afraid the only one scared here would be you when having to deal with facts. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 11:58 AM |
| 1 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.quoted fragments You declared it "unfounded paranoia", which has been repeatedly addressed as you've continued to rant about it. You also tried to dismiss how karma relates to posts with "imaginary internet points", which was also already addressed. There wasn't much to say to the Hitler comment, as you've clearly gotten desperate. There's no need to quote you on every single word, so you'll need to find something else to latch onto if that's the best you can come up with. getting upset Being pr… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 11:00 AM |
| 2 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.unfounded paranoia Ah yes, the archived evidence, not including SRS's long archived history, is "unfounded paranoia". imaginary internet points They actually do hide the post. At this point your deliberate ignorance is getting really desperate. Hitler You know, in a thread about SRS brigading and shitposting, you probably shouldn't act like a typical SRS'er. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 10:33 AM |
| 2 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.SJW admin buddies. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 09:16 AM |
| 1 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.rather than teach people to worry about downvotes No, that is irrelevant. We are currently teaching people about issues men face in the subreddit, yet you expect us to instead change the views of millions of Reddit users about a setting system rather than oppose those brigading the sub. Nor does it solve the problem of now spam and poor posts being placed alongside good posts. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 05:58 AM |
| 6 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.Thanks but I've got a pretty good grasp of downvotes Yet you ranted about "tinfoil hats" when it was pointed out. metaphorical downvote brigade The OP is actual verified evidence that SRS is planning a brigade. So none of your continued ranting holds much point. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 03:16 AM |
| 11 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up."Downvotes during brigades are used to hide good posts and threads" "Tinfoil hatter!" "What are you talking about?" "Stop being emotional!" ...riiiiiiight. You're getting quite a bit ridiculous over someone pointing out how downvotes work. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 02:50 AM |
| 29 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.Bingo. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 02:44 AM |
| 21 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.Why would they attack Polandball? Because they are Nazis. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 02:44 AM |
| 5 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.tinfoil hat ...I'm not sure what you're ranting about? The fact that downvotes hide posts or that SRS has been confirmed trying to brigade? | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 02:42 AM |
| 27 | SRS is planning to brigade Mens Rights. Just a heads up.And while that's a fantastic stance to take, karma isn't the sole thing that is relevant. Negative karma can see any good thread or post buried and hidden, effectively censoring it. And that's not including the shitposting. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/15 01:23 AM |
| 6 | US Navy Now Teaching Members about "Male Privilege;" Says Buying Truck is Example of PrivilegeThat's an incredibly misleading title. No it's not. Who the hell is upvoting this guy? This is about making large purchases/decisions without consulting your spouse It's in the sentence you quoted: "I told him we needed" Apparently the wife directly demanding he get something is "making decisions without consulting your spouse". He got a truck. Trucks can damn well carry a family and the common occurrence is that a useful car like a truck that can fit the whole family is tends to be considered t… | /r/MensRights | 10/10/15 05:19 AM |
| 2 | The Navy is now teaching that "male privilege" is domestic violence against women and that violent movies, tv shows and books turn men into abusersAnd not everyone that strikes their child is an abuser. Controlling finances has absolutely no relation to that. You can control your own finances when you don't even have a partner, you cannot hit a child you don't have. You obviously don't like the word You obviously don't like basic facts countering you if this now is what you're trying to do. It's not an indicator. At all. It has no correlation (unless you think eating is also a "correlation" to abuse) and it has no causation link. It isn't,… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 04:48 AM |
| 1 | The Navy is now teaching that "male privilege" is domestic violence against women and that violent movies, tv shows and books turn men into abusersI asked you a question. it's not a fallacy. That strawman sure as hell is as well, as I solely referred to your attempt to dismiss my post with claims I'm being defensive by presenting facts. yes, controlling the finances is an indicator of abuse And strangely enough you continuing to repeat that countered claim is still not giving you an argument. No, it's not. By definition it cannot be an indicator as both those with financial control and without can be abusers and there is no link to control… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 04:14 AM |
| 0 | The Navy is now teaching that "male privilege" is domestic violence against women and that violent movies, tv shows and books turn men into abusersIt is an indicator. No, it isn't. When abusers act the opposite way as well and controlling finances is a common occurance unrelated to abuse, it by definition is not an indicators. By your absurd logic someone eating food is an indicator that they're an abuser because abusers eat food. i don't get why you seem so defensive. You're going to have to try a different fallacy if you think that's an argument. Using the children is more of a sign of abuse Which is irrelevant to this. In relation to yo… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 03:29 AM |
| 1 | While the story of female suffrage is taught at school from a young age, few people today know the long and gruesome history of how men won the right to voteMen are not underrepresented in film. Which is irrelevant to what the poster stated. [raging about the sub now] Try your desperate strawmen somewhere else. Edit: I see you're a one month old account with very few posts (not even a page), most of which are downvotes, in which you constantly rant that /r/mensrights is a hate group and attack the movement. It's pretty clear where you've always stood on the subject. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 03:17 AM |
| 1 | While the story of female suffrage is taught at school from a young age, few people today know the long and gruesome history of how men won the right to voteMen simply being in a film doesn't have any relevance to what is being discussed. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 01:59 AM |
| 2 | The Navy is now teaching that "male privilege" is domestic violence against women and that violent movies, tv shows and books turn men into abusersIt's that it can be an indicator It's not an indicator, this was just explained. Abusers also use children and pets. It's not an indicator that people with children and pets are abusers. and it would be nice if people recognized it could be used by women I JUST specified in the previous post it can also be women. but every abuser controls the finances And again, this was just explained. No, every abuser does not control the finances. In fact it can be the opposite, as well as not at all. Which i… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 01:58 AM |
| 1 | While the story of female suffrage is taught at school from a young age, few people today know the long and gruesome history of how men won the right to voteThat is a terrible, terrible name. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 01:38 AM |
| 5 | While the story of female suffrage is taught at school from a young age, few people today know the long and gruesome history of how men won the right to voteMen in the United States also don't yet have the right to vote. They have to sign up for Selective Service or they are disallowed that right. Women get it the moment they turn 18. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 01:36 AM |
| 1 | While the story of female suffrage is taught at school from a young age, few people today know the long and gruesome history of how men won the right to voteSelma Uh, that's more about how he was an asshole and she was super crazy. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 01:35 AM |
| 1 | While the story of female suffrage is taught at school from a young age, few people today know the long and gruesome history of how men won the right to voteYeah, the bombings that set the universal suffrage movements that were fighting for both male and female, some even black, right to vote by a few decades. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 01:33 AM |
| 1 | The Navy is now teaching that "male privilege" is domestic violence against women and that violent movies, tv shows and books turn men into abusersThat's FREEDOM Navy to you. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 01:22 AM |
| 1 | The Navy is now teaching that "male privilege" is domestic violence against women and that violent movies, tv shows and books turn men into abusersTrad-Cons Yes, clearly they must be traditionalists while they directly spout off a talking point about "male privilege" that only comes from feminists. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 12:16 AM |
| 3 | The Navy is now teaching that "male privilege" is domestic violence against women and that violent movies, tv shows and books turn men into abusersJust getting those screen grabs for AgainstMensRights, eh? Run along, little SJW. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 12:15 AM |
| 4 | The Navy is now teaching that "male privilege" is domestic violence against women and that violent movies, tv shows and books turn men into abusersI've struggled with this for a long time. I grew up in a traditional (and happy) home and loved it. Traditional roles are entirely about stability. That's it. The problem comes when someone in those roles wants another choice or they rejects that role. Then it becomes a serious issue, as it can't be enforced without forcing others into roles that are entirely arbitrary. Which is why traditional gender roles are opposed by most of the MRM. We believe in the choice and freedom of equality, not dec… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 12:13 AM |
| 2 | The Navy is now teaching that "male privilege" is domestic violence against women and that violent movies, tv shows and books turn men into abusersAnd many men and women who are in abusive relationships also earn the finance and effectively control it but their partner takes it on demand. It goes either way. Which is why control of the finances is not an indicator of abuse. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/15 11:54 PM |
| 9 | The Navy is now teaching that "male privilege" is domestic violence against women and that violent movies, tv shows and books turn men into abusersComparing someone who can lift their own weight and is heavy with someone who can't lift their own weight and is light? | /r/MensRights | 08/10/15 11:51 PM |
| 3 | I am just speechless. Women disrupt opening of movie about female terrorists to push the narrative that women are still somehow weak and helpless."2 women are killed each week!" And 2 men are killed every 11 days. By their female partners. Not including normal male death toles by murder, which overwhelmingly exceed women. Not including male accident deaths, which overwhelmingly exceed women. Not including male suicides, which overwhelmingly exceed women. No, apparently 2 deaths every 7 days is an epidemic against women. While the same deaths every 11 days is somehow irrelevant and those murders of men by their female partners is the Patri… | /r/MensRights | 08/10/15 02:44 AM |
| 7 | "Women legislators turn the tables and introduce bills regulating men's reproductive health" - Daily KosOh, so now an official introduced legal bill by an elected official is "just a joke". And I thought "omg kill all men is just a joke" was a ridiculous enough deflection. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/15 11:00 AM |
| 10 | "Women legislators turn the tables and introduce bills regulating men's reproductive health" - Daily KosSo in response to women (who, as another user pointed out, are the majority who oppose abortion) and men opposing abortion based on their belief a fetus is a person and it is effectively "murdering" someone, which has absolutely no relation to women and would apply the same way if males could become pregnant... And in response to this issue that is almost entirely religious and based on the idea a fetus is a person, not an "attack on women"... Feminist politicians deliberately and knowing try to… | /r/MensRights | 04/10/15 08:28 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.Oh, still shitspamming here as well? Come back when you have an actual argument that isn't raging and screaming. | /r/MGTOW | 02/10/15 08:49 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.I'm also the purest anti-SJW there is. So far you've done nothing but act like a typical SJW. So that's not really holding up. I'm afraid your continued shitspamming still isn't giving you any remote argument either. | /r/MGTOW | 02/10/15 08:24 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.Oh, you're still shitspamming? | /r/MGTOW | 02/10/15 08:03 AM |
| 1 | 'Kind, funny and bright' student, 17, hanged himself after being falsely accused of rape and finding it 'difficult to cope with the investigation'Wasn't there another case recently where a teenager committed suicide because his teacher caught him receiving a drunken blowjob, while he too was drunk, from another female student at school camp and the piece of shit told him that because she was drunk it was rape? That got me fucking raging. He went home and killed himself thinking he was going to go to jail for rape. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/15 04:39 AM |
| 3 | 'Kind, funny and bright' student, 17, hanged himself after being falsely accused of rape and finding it 'difficult to cope with the investigation'Geez man, they're even trying to blame the shooting on GamerGate. It's messed up. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/15 04:35 AM |
| 2 | "All of the women agreed that domestic violence is never the woman's fault".Hey, you never know. The more hardcore homophobic public activists are, the more likely they are to be gay. Maybe it's the same for these misandrist assholes. They're more likely to be sexist and abuse their partners. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/15 04:19 AM |
| 2 | "All of the women agreed that domestic violence is never the woman's fault".This movement is fucked in my opinion The article is a year old. And it took me 5 fucking seconds of checking the comments to see that the mods there have been systematically deleting comments that refuted or countered the article. If this is what it takes for you to rage quit a movement that isn't based on Reddit (this is, one of many, subs dedicated to the discussion of the MRM and subjects related to the MRM. We are not the MRM), then I doubt you were that involved in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/15 04:17 AM |
| 1 | "All of the women agreed that domestic violence is never the woman's fault".The only time I've ever actually heard it said is in films and tv shows. The only time I've heard it referenced is in relation only to young children. I suppose that's why feminists now try to push the claim that a 5 year old pulling a girls hair because he likes her is evidence that society encourages boys to grow up to be rapists. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/15 04:09 AM |
| 1 | SJW accuses guy arguing with her of making rape threat, gets him firedIt's amazing people are trying to defend this bitch. They lied about a rape threat to get someone fired. Doxed them, repeatedly spouted off the same bullshit the guy was and now posts it on a mainstream media outlet. Because he disagreed with her. The shit everyone keeps trying to victim blame him with happened after she threatened to get him fired for disagreeing with her. Apparently, according to those defending this bitch, a guy should just keep taking punches in the face because if he fights… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/15 04:38 AM |
| 1 | SJW accuses guy arguing with her of making rape threat, gets him firedSorry to burst the bubble guys, but if she doesn't want to have sex with him that would be a rape threat Sorry to burst your desperate deliberate quote mining but on top of that by itself still not being a threat I REALLY don't think intentionally leaving off the REST of that same quote in which he calls them ugly and that he WOULDN'T SLEEP WITH THEM is even remotely going to make it a "rape threat". Telling someone that they you don't want to sleep with them is NOT a rape threat. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/15 04:29 AM |
| 2 | SJW accuses guy arguing with her of making rape threat, gets him firedMisleading title. It's literally what happened. Please, tell us where this "rape threat" was? | /r/MensRights | 30/09/15 12:57 AM |
| 8 | So apparently a married man doesn't have the right to decide against a vasectomy once in a relationship.....It's just damn fucking pathetic. Check out his post history for that thread. They've downvoted not just basic medical statements but even him saying it's my body, my choice. ... -95 points: Yep. My body, my choice. Simple as that. I wonder how it would be if it were a woman being pressured to have a medical procedure? -69 points: "man up" is definitely sexist. My wife has never said that to me because she has the decency to know its a sexist thing to say. It seems reddit does not know that. -96 … | /r/MensRights | 29/09/15 12:18 PM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.My repeated WISDOM is to Geez, you're not even attempting to hide being a SJW shitposter are you. Hilarious is that you continue to shitspam and spam the report feature while it's clear to the mods that you've been shitspamming this entire thread, including at users who you then attacked thinking it was me. | /r/MGTOW | 29/09/15 07:20 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.Oh, you're still spamming the report button feature? That's okay, I've already reported you and detailed this. But I'm sure if you keep shitspamming, including unrelated posts, it'll totally give you an argument. no such thing Uh, yes. Yes there is. You can search for links and keywords based on time. The only link every to be posted that showed up was in /r/cringe. That you're now lying about an inbuilt feature everyone knows about as well as shitspamming is just kinda sad. brain and eyes That'… | /r/MGTOW | 29/09/15 07:07 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.And now you're spamming the report feature with false reports? By your own admission? So I'm afraid I'll have to actually report you now. Sorry, no, posting exactly as required (checking for links, title and archived and finding it not posted and then posting it archived and in agreement with the sub is not against the rules) isn't breaking the rules, nor is you shitspamming my posts magically me spamming. | /r/MGTOW | 29/09/15 06:57 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.Oh, you're still spamming the thread? Sorry, you're the only one here who has broken the rules. You even shitspammed a user who wasn't me. Wouldn't be surprised if you're an SRS'er trying to make this sub look bad. | /r/MGTOW | 29/09/15 06:47 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.Your repeated shitposting at near every reply ITT shows you do. | /r/MGTOW | 28/09/15 07:01 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.Yeah, did you not notice that this user isn't me in your shitposting ITT? Stop raging at other users for not seeing it. It makes even less sense than raging at me for searching properly and it not coming up, as why would a user search for a thread on it if they didn't know it EXISTED. | /r/MGTOW | 28/09/15 06:48 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.search by time Time has nothing to do with it when the search is for the article on all times. That you're still shitposting on every other reply is showing how ridiculous this is. | /r/MGTOW | 28/09/15 06:38 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.Let me just suggest that if you do it again I'll hit the Report button Do what again? Politely ask for links to the threads? Ask someone to stop being defensive after a user went through all the required efforts to see if this thread had been posted? Because i'm very sure that faux spamming of the report feature is against the rules and you shitspamming the thread is actually reportable. arrogant levels of stupidity!!!! Oh yes, apparently posting on subject after searching to see if this thread … | /r/MGTOW | 28/09/15 06:21 AM |
| -1 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.No, it seems you're just shitposting at this point. I did a search for this article. I searched for both the article link, the archived article link and the title. None came up. I then posted an on topic thread, with an archived link, stating clearly the article is a smear on MGTOW. It seems the only people who don't understand are the other user, and you who has jumped in to shitpost on this sub, who both don't seem to grasp how subreddits work and have immediately began raging over someone doi… | /r/MGTOW | 28/09/15 06:10 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.I'm not the one being "defensive" Yes, you really are. You've gone from immediately ranting about not being a "member of this forum" and "we don't need another shitfest blah blah blah". All because I asked for links. In a thread that was only posted after I repeatedly searched for whether or not it was posted. Which still was posted calling it shit and archiving it. Yet you've gone from that to now ranting "troll". It would be amusing to see what you don't consider a troll. Perhaps next time you… | /r/MGTOW | 28/09/15 05:59 AM |
| -1 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.I think the problem is that YOU don't understand Let me just stop your continued absurd defensiveness right there. There is no requirement to be a "constant member" of a sub in order to know about something like this, especially when I explicitly specify i'm not. Secondly by your own admission just now you admit that the links don't work for every specific URL. Which means that no, it isn't my fault because I searched for both the LINK and the ARCHIVED link, as well as the title. I then posted t… | /r/MGTOW | 28/09/15 03:59 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.No real problem not posting, perfectly acceptable to not want to be flooded with the same posts. But this just came out and I did search both the link and the archive but nothing came up. At least the other threads detail how ridiculous this hit piece is. | /r/MGTOW | 28/09/15 02:53 AM |
| 0 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.Well, if you were actually a member of this forum it would be obvious. I don't think you understand how subs work. I did submit the link, the only thing that came up was /r/cringe. Then I submitted the archive, nothing came up. None of the articles you've listed are the title of the article either. So getting defensive because I search as much as I could is pretty ridiculous. | /r/MGTOW | 28/09/15 02:50 AM |
| 1 | Not a MGTOW but this article by Vice was a really pathetic smear attempt on you guys.Where are these threads? | /r/MGTOW | 28/09/15 02:03 AM |
| 5 | Australia's new Prime Minister rolls out a $100m safety net for victims of domestic abuse, women and children only.Australia can afford $100,000 to find shelter for pets of domestic violence victims. Yet not a single cent for mens shelters for domestic violence. In Australia, men are worth less than dogs. Now they pull $100 million out of their ass, while screaming about budget cuts to education, hospitals and police, and again don't provide a single cent for male domestic violence victims. Even child ones. While feminists praise this to high heaven. Tell me again how feminists praising denying half of domes… | /r/MensRights | 24/09/15 08:29 AM |
| 11 | Australia's new Prime Minister rolls out a $100m safety net for victims of domestic abuse, women and children only.Dead god, that's absolutely horrendous. Everything i've heard about Australia seems like it's slipping to the deranged feminist bullshit at a startling pace even as the rest of the world begins to pull itself out of their ignorant ideology. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/15 08:25 AM |
| 2 | Same city, same year. Man has sex with 15yo girl he believed to be 19, goes straight to jail. Woman has sex with her 14yo male student, avoids jail because judge "did not believe the woman deserved to go to jail".This is how feminists are reacting to this thread. Apparently women being given less harsher sentences due to feminist lobbying efforts is the fault of the "Patriarchy". And clearly saying a female pedophile is bad means you "hate women". | /r/MensRights | 19/09/15 05:38 AM |
| 2 | Saving for a Daughter but Not a Son: This Father Is Starting a Fund to Combat the Wage GapNot just a political statement. A false political statement. The wage gap is a blatant lie and doesn't exist. It's no different than telling his daughter that she can't work in STEM because she's a woman. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/15 03:44 AM |
| 2 | Harvard students edit Wikipedia in effort to ‘dismantle the patriarchy’Ahem. Feminist science | /r/MensRights | 10/09/15 03:39 AM |
| 10 | Harvard students edit Wikipedia in effort to ‘dismantle the patriarchy’Apart from where admins find out about this and let it go. The admins are meant to fix these problems. They find out and then refuse to, siding with the ideologue feminists. GamerGate even showed that JW will refuse to use their administrative power to deal with blatant rule breaking by admins and editors. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/15 03:38 AM |
| 2 | Harvard students edit Wikipedia in effort to ‘dismantle the patriarchy’Yes, it literally is. Admins are aware of it and let it continue. Higher ups know the admins let it continue. The owners know and let it continue. Wikipedia is now deliberately pushing POV, even when it violates their rules. They are the issue. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/15 03:35 AM |
| 2 | Girlfriend pinches me and I swat her hand to stop her from doing it and now I'm the one that is wrong.It definitely isn't your fault. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/15 12:54 AM |
| 2 | Girlfriend pinches me and I swat her hand to stop her from doing it and now I'm the one that is wrong.I know that feel, man. Had an ex who would always flip out when I blocked her play-punches. Never took issue with it myself just because we were playing around and i'm bigger than her, so when she full on tried to hit my shoulders it didn't hurt. But most of the time i'd be quick enough and put my hand up to block her. She'd of course not react quickly enough and end up slamming her hand into the back of my blocking fist instead of the soft shoulder. Problem is that every time she'd do that she … | /r/MensRights | 02/09/15 12:29 PM |
| 2 | Girl pressures boyfriend into commiting suicide, researches methods, and after his death becomes "mental health advocate." Defense attorney argues that dead boyfriend 'brainwashed...an impressionable young girl.'No amount of puppy eyes will hide that forehead. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/15 12:24 PM |
| 0 | Judge Orders Rape Victims to take a polygraph test.OMG YOU'RE AMOGING! YOU'RE ALSO A BETA! Oh boy, Devlish, you've really gone full retard at this point. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/15 01:37 PM |
| 0 | Judge Orders Rape Victims to take a polygraph test.Not my claim. Stop AMOGing. Geez, Devlish you could at least try to be a little less fucking obvious. Especially since i've not ONCE stated it was your claim in that post, directly referring to the claim and replying specifically to thing you actually said. This would be just levels of absurd behaviour from you even if you hadn't been obvious and were "totally not the same user". That you think screaming "OMG YOU'RE AMOGING!" is actually an argument against sourced facts refuting the claim is sh… | /r/MensRights | 31/08/15 02:52 AM |
| 3 | Teen Finally charged with Manslaughter after telling her boyfriend to kill himself.I swear her forehead is getting higher as this trial commences. ...it's full of secrets. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/15 01:49 PM |
| 0 | Judge Orders Rape Victims to take a polygraph test.Your counter claim: No, my counter was to provide a large pile of sources directly refuting your claim. So pretending one thing I said is what my counter was is just reeeeeally desperate at this point. not seen anything Again, i'll take psychologists, lawyers and journalists over you simply saying so. doesn't necessarily negate my claim When reliable study after study repeatedly show that people are LESS likely to tell the truth under polygraph then YES it directly negates your claim. semantics!… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/15 01:35 PM |
| 1 | Judge Orders Rape Victims to take a polygraph test.I really dont care less about any of your points even if I believed you which I dont. Did you forget to log out of your alt account, eh Devlish? Whoops. Though i'm sure it'll now be "b-but I was just..." You "not believing me" has absolutely no bearing on anything. The claim is false, is has been refuted by major psychological organizations, lawyers and mainstream media sources alone. Not to mention the countless more studies over the last few decades. You "not believing it" holds about as much … | /r/MensRights | 30/08/15 12:44 PM |
| 0 | Judge Orders Rape Victims to take a polygraph test.I haven't downvoted you Yes, i'm suuuuure you haven't. But good job at deliberately not addressing anything at all I have said and immediately again basing your argument on "you d-downvoted meee". you are strawmanning Sorry, after you've already been directly quoted trying to strawman in the previous post I don't think that is going to work out either. obnoxious You've really run out of arguments this fast? i'm not trying to counter This was obvious when you reposted my own link that refuted you… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/15 12:38 PM |
| 0 | Judge Orders Rape Victims to take a polygraph test.You are STILL talking about the results of the polygraph. No, I directly refuted your claim. That you would flat out lie about what i've just posted is pathetic. Innocent people are MORE likely, as shown by every reliable study, to admit guilt on a polygraph. That's the opposite of telling the truth. It's even apparent with your deliberate lying that you didn't even read the sources that just refuted you because you even managed to present a "counter" to me by posting one of the SAME links I JUS… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/15 11:57 AM |
| 1 | Judge Orders Rape Victims to take a polygraph test.being strapped to the polygraph makes you more likely to tell the truth. That is blatantly false. The opposite occurs with polygraphs, which are more likely to put an innocent person in jail than to get a guilty person to state the truth about their guilt. It is no different than claiming that "only guilty people take plea deals". You are deliberately making shit up for your bullshit claim. http://wrongfulconvictionsblog.org/2012/02/23/the-polygraph-and-false-confessions/ http://www.cvsa1.com/po… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/15 09:12 AM |
| 1 | California bill would close 'insidious' wage gap between men and womenJust linked this to non-English-as-first-language friend. His grasp of grammar is a little off and he took it as California was creating a law to close women being illegally paid more than men in some jobs. He was a little shocked, thinking America already had equal pay laws. Had to explain to him that it was a law to pay women more than men. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/15 04:00 AM |
| 1 | Judge Orders Rape Victims to take a polygraph test.Who the hell is upvoting this guy? The opposite of your claim is what happens. Criminals tend to pass lie detectors, while innocent people confess. It's as ridiculously absurd as claiming plea deals are more likely to be taken by guilty people. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/15 03:53 AM |
| 5 | Judge Orders Rape Victims to take a polygraph test.The point is that being strapped to a polygraph gets people to tell the truth much more than they would without it. That is completely fucking false. Edit: http://wrongfulconvictionsblog.org/2012/02/23/the-polygraph-and-false-confessions/ http://www.cvsa1.com/polygraphfailures.htm http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/polygraph/ota/index.html http://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug04/polygraph.aspx http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309084369 https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/201303/do… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/15 03:51 AM |
| 4 | Sexist word "Manspreading" added to the oxford English dictionary.We are become German, destroyer of spacesinbetweenwords. | /r/MensRights | 29/08/15 03:50 AM |
| 1 | Women colonising male safe spaces includes MRMOut you go, SRS. Nobody is buying your shit now. That you think you can even pretend to be anything but a troll after posting shit like "Elliot Rodger was right" is just hilarious. | /r/MensRights | 29/08/15 03:22 AM |
| 0 | Women colonising male safe spaces includes MRMAnd then sometimes users like OP 'Homosoxual' make it so glaringly obvious they're trolling from anti-MRA subs that it's just sad they think it would work here... Caught OP randomly spewing "Elliot Rodger was right" on a random thread where he thought it might go unnoticed. Likely trying to get some sad little screen cap to use against the sub. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 12:32 PM |
| -3 | Women colonising male safe spaces includes MRMThis is exactly what I am talking about. Let me just stop your obvious ass right there. It was just specifically explained to you that the fact you're spewing idiocy that we constantly see feminists spew about us with a one day old account on NEGATIVE karma makes it damn obvious that this is one of many desperate attempts anti-MRA's and their subs here try to pull on /r/mensrights all the damn time. That this was just explained and still you managed to present this hilarious faux offended exclam… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 11:48 AM |
| 0 | Women colonising male safe spaces includes MRM1 day old account sitting on negative karma posting absurd rhetoric that sounds exactly how feminists claim we act? Even if OP and this thread weren't obvious god damn SRS troll shitspamming for some desperate screen grab to post on AgainstMensRights or some such shithole, the Mens Rights Movement is NOT exclusionary. We are not a "safe space", hug box or tumblr blog for only men to do "manly" things. We are a movement dedicated to fighting for the equality of men and boys everywhere so they can… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 10:00 AM |
| 0 | Did anyone else see the men's rights article in Playboy? What did you think?It's really sad these idiots didn't learn the first time 'round when feminists were trying to shut down their sexual livelihood. They think it won't be the same the second time 'round, hoo-boy. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 09:29 AM |
| 12 | Sexist word "Manspreading" added to the oxford English dictionary.Problem is that these feminists are getting their buzzwords into a major dictionary, despite the fact Oxford Dictionary is meant to reflect word use by the general populous. No-one outside of their very small clique is using this word. They're either taking a ideological slant or they have gotten so lazy as to take clickbait articles as definitions for words outside of both their use within that minority clique and through their previous dedicated research. Which means Oxford Dictionary is losin… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 09:02 AM |
| 0 | Army stats show that women are injured twice as often as men in combat trainingBut that doesn't have much to do with Male Rights. I'm sure you think saying the Lords prayer in school doesn't have anything to do with "promoting a specific religion" either, eh? | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 08:44 AM |
| 1 | Army stats show that women are injured twice as often as men in combat trainingWhat's important is that both sexes are treated fairly. You understand that the "fairness" issue here is that women are washing out with lifetime injuries that will cost hundreds of thousands over a lifetime (perhaps more) within a few months of training. The sheer statistical risk that any woman trying to pass the fitness requirements may be seriously injured, where men will overwhelmingly not be, and cost the government hundreds of thousands of dollars without ever actually seeing service is t… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 08:42 AM |
| 1 | Stop Saying Women Are More Likely Than Men to Be Murdered at WorkA friend overseas is seeing local government (council?) adverts popping up everywhere in his city about women being "45% of homeless". They're flat out lying, just as they always have. It's disgusting. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 08:20 AM |
| 3 | This is how Mary P. Koss, one of the most prominent feminist researchers in the field of sexual violence in the United States, feels about male rape victims.Jesus fucking Christ. Posting so i can recall it later. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/15 11:56 AM |
| 6 | "Men will sleep easier if there's a 50/50 quota" impressive sexist idiocy from The AgeArguing for quotas to increase the number of women in areas women are the majority. It's just pure supremacy at this point. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/15 04:54 AM |
| 3 | When hashtag-style snippy feminism kills: Man dies after six hour ambulance delay and being told he had 'man flu'The opposite is true for women...they'll soldier on with a cold Because women on average will have mild symptoms for weeks. Men fight off that exact same infection within days. Male immune systems tend to go into overdrive and severely fuck us up. That you think women "soldier on" with a drawn out easier to handle condition rather than all at once is pretty ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/15 11:54 PM |
| 3 | When hashtag-style snippy feminism kills: Man dies after six hour ambulance delay and being told he had 'man flu'The term "man flu" exists because human male immune systems on average tend to go full throttle when dealing with things like flus. What would be a week or even a month of mild to bad flu symptoms for women can be over in as little as a few days for men. The downside to such a fast recovery rate is that we are absolutely fucked for those few days. We run extremely high fevers, we hallucinate, , we get drenched in sweat, we can barely breath as the immune system runs through each stage of fightin… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/15 11:50 PM |
| 3 | Pual Elam take on the Roosh V incedentThey do when you create non-existent threats and milk them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/15 01:17 AM |
| 2 | Pual Elam take on the Roosh V incedentYes, fake threats sent to yourself that you then attempt to profit off of aren't taken seriously. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/08/15 11:45 PM |
| 3 | Pual Elam take on the Roosh V incedentPolice said that they didn't have the ability or resources to seek out the sources of the threats. No, they said the threats were "not credible" and "that it was similar to other threats that Sarkeesian received in the past". Which is why they gave the go ahead for her to have her talk. It's pretty hilarious you would claim a lack of resources when the USU police worked to assess the level of threat with other local, state and federal agencies, including the Utah Statewide Information and Analys… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/08/15 12:46 PM |
| 3 | Pual Elam take on the Roosh V incedentYeah, just like how she said "GamerGate is mentioned by name" in her "totally real" (but, you know, police said it wasn't a legit threat) school shooting threat but when the letter was made public it literally didn't make one mention of GamerGate? Yeah, yeah, her word is her bond, man. Totes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/08/15 11:46 AM |
| 9 | Pual Elam take on the Roosh V incedentShe sent herself fake death threats? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/08/15 11:30 AM |
| 5 | Roosh V assaulted during visit to MontrealIf a violent criminal or murderer who had served their time was physically attacked by feminists we should still be expressing our opposition to the violation of his rights. That this piece of shit hasn't actually committed a crime and was physically attacked by feminists makes it worse, as he has done nothing to lose his rights other than to use his freedom of speech to say moronic, misogynistic shit legally, then those IN the wrong (these feminists and the men they got to fight their battles f… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/15 08:30 AM |
| 3 | What we are all aiming for (X-post from TrollXChromosomes)Bingo. The only reason feminism is opposed is because it systematically and consistently fights against equal rights for men. MRA's have overwhelmingly shown they will work hand in hand with feminists that support equality and don't try and attack the MRM. Ironically every feminist the MRM works with is declared a "traitor" by the rest of feminism and cast out. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/15 01:23 AM |
| 4 | What we are all aiming for (X-post from TrollXChromosomes)Remember, the only reason gays are targeted for abuse is because of men and their hatred for femininity. Because apparently gay people can't be men and they are only defined by being like women. homophobic feminist logic | /r/MensRights | 07/08/15 01:18 AM |
| 3 | What we are all aiming for (X-post from TrollXChromosomes)I believe in shared parenting That makes you a "traitor" to feminist groups like NOW. I believe in the wage gap That makes you ignorant. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/15 01:14 AM |
| 4 | What we are all aiming for (X-post from TrollXChromosomes)and why the wage gap will never be pushed by MRAs. The wage gap isn't pushed by MRA's because it's demonstratably refuted. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/15 01:13 AM |
| 4 | What we are all aiming for (X-post from TrollXChromosomes)I think about it like majoring in college. Just because I majored in English, doesn't mean my other non-English courses were shit/unimportant. Problem comes when English majors don't declare that all other majors are part of their English major and then start attacking any degree that doesn't label themselves as part of an English degree. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/15 01:11 AM |
| 3 | What we are all aiming for (X-post from TrollXChromosomes)Actually you directly contradict your earlier definition: Because feminism comes from the notion that we (men and women) are trying to free ourselves from the archaic idea of a patriarchy, which affects both genders. We all know what the dictionary definition of feminism is. That feminists don't meet that definition, declare unrelated things to be part of feminism and then desperately refer back to the dictionary when they're refuted or their actions don't reflect the dictionary definition is ex… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/15 01:08 AM |
| -1 | What we are all aiming for (X-post from TrollXChromosomes)"Mysteriously" OP isn't replying to these comments. But I see they're quite active in all the comments that came after ranting "omg stop downvoting meee, why won't you discuuuuss" as each post of theirs sits on tens of upvotes and the thread on 500+. Given that we're being brigaded by SRS right now, this reeks of SRS bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/15 01:01 AM |
| 3 | Guys, I am really worried we are going to be banned. If we do get banned in the near future, I just want you all to know that it's been awesome discussing these issues with you.So subs that haven't been posted in for over a year can get banned for "problematic" non-rule breaking... But SRS openly and brazenly breaking the rules in large numbers is "hardly affects anything"? | /r/MensRights | 06/08/15 12:04 PM |
| 12 | Guys, I am really worried we are going to be banned. If we do get banned in the near future, I just want you all to know that it's been awesome discussing these issues with you.but it was also offensive to absolutely anyone else who wasn't a flaming racist. If you are a supporter of equality, which the typical poster on MensRights is, then you can hardly see any possible connection. "Their views are different from all the other offensive views, even though they didn't break the rules and are as bad as SRS, and if you disagree YOU'RE A RACIST" Get the fuck out of here with that illogical bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/15 12:00 PM |
| 49 | Guys, I am really worried we are going to be banned. If we do get banned in the near future, I just want you all to know that it's been awesome discussing these issues with you.Coontown was purely racist idiocy Pure racist ideology that followed the rules. SRS is the SJW version of CoonTown and they haven't been banned. Considering the subs that have been "quarantined" that aren't racist, sexist, bigot or in any way offensive, that these new rules allow them to declare based on their feels instead of actual breaking of the rules /r/MensRights can very well be removed in near future. It's exactly why you allow shithols like /r/CoonTown to have their little racist hugbox… | /r/MensRights | 06/08/15 11:58 AM |
| 3 | Woman tries to have husband killed. Gets probation and custody of the kids.This is pushing for another Dear Zachary tier fucking mess! Get those kids out of there! | /r/MensRights | 05/08/15 06:33 AM |
| 9 | Top 10 arguments from the "Anti-Legalization" side of the Prostitution Amnesty debateFor every sex worker rights group a victim group opposes it! [Proceeds to link to human trafficking groups, not anti-prostitution survivor groups.] We are not conflating human trafficking with voluntary prostitution [Proceeds to repeatedly conflate human trafficking with safe, legal prostitution] So it appears feminists are once again on their anti-sex and anti-sexual choice campaigns ala the 70's and 80's. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/15 12:42 AM |
| 2 | Abusive daughter Siti Redha Khamis beats mother. she feeds mom poop & Urine. But police take no action on her, instead arrest her male neighbor. Even news reports have pic only of guy not the abusive daughter. This news is has given me big shock.Tell someone to "go eat shit" once and you never hear the end of it... | /r/MensRights | 04/08/15 12:33 AM |
| 12 | Looks like we were mentioned in a Cracked.com article!Literally links to the Red Pill sub while quoting it as coming from /r/MensRights. It was some special levels of insane from that one. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/15 12:28 AM |
| 16 | Milo Yiannopoulos SCHOOLS & OUTWITS TWO Feminists with Charm and Logic! - Sky News - MGTOW MRM MRANot really, I've debated plenty of people who flat out lie and state they are paid less for the same work when they end up basing their entire argument on it being true. It gets pretty ridiculous when they claim that they're paid less while working in a retail outlet where every clerk is paid the exact same for the same hours. A friend's young feminist sister ranted once she was paid leas than her older male counterpart until it was shown that she earns less because everyone under 21 earns less … | /r/MensRights | 04/08/15 12:12 AM |
| 1 | Cosby's [Female] Lawyer: I'm Not Victim-Blaming, But "Women Have Responsibility [to report alleged rapes straight away]. We have responsibility for our bodies, we have responsibility for our decisions, we have responsibility for the way we conduct ourselves." Oh dear, she spoke the truth!The dude already fucking admitted to buying ludes for the sole purpose of supplying to women. Oh no, women asked for, received and then knowingly voluntarily took a recreational drug during the 70's? A court document that directly refutes the claims of those two women that they were forcibly drugged? Clearly he's a fucking drugging rapist then. Back to SRS. Strangely enough we don't consider evidence clearing him as proof of rape, no matter how many times you little feminists stick your head in … | /r/MensRights | 03/08/15 01:59 AM |
| 2 | The Guardian continues to infantalize women: "There can be no amnesty for those who buy sex – not even if women ‘consent' "More so, since the majority of human trafficking isn't in prostitution but in forced labour. But mysteriously I don't see anyone calling to ban laundromats, restaurants, farms and factories | /r/MensRights | 03/08/15 01:09 AM |
| 1 | Cosby's [Female] Lawyer: I'm Not Victim-Blaming, But "Women Have Responsibility [to report alleged rapes straight away]. We have responsibility for our bodies, we have responsibility for our decisions, we have responsibility for the way we conduct ourselves." Oh dear, she spoke the truth!So was Michael Jackson. Yet he was one of most sensitive and docile people in the business. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/15 12:47 AM |
| 0 | Cosby's [Female] Lawyer: I'm Not Victim-Blaming, But "Women Have Responsibility [to report alleged rapes straight away]. We have responsibility for our bodies, we have responsibility for our decisions, we have responsibility for the way we conduct ourselves." Oh dear, she spoke the truth!Oh hey, that's the same thing every feminist has claimed every other time we question an evidence lacking rape claim of a man. The same thing we heard for the Mattress Girl. The same thing we heard for the Rolling Stones hoax. Oh but this time it's different because "it'll make us look bad". The MRM is demonized and vilified in all media. So go fuck yourself back to SRS if you think demanding due process is somehow "delegitimizing" fighting for men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/15 12:42 AM |
| 10 | They did it: Feminists are now claiming that the Lafayette theater shooting shows an "epidemic" of violence against women by 'white men'. And the shooter did so because of his "anti-feminist" views because once he said he was against abortion (as that apparently means you're anti-feminist)Hey, i'm fine with not using ad hominems. But an ad hominem is using an insult to dismiss the argument. I'm insulting the insane feminist, not dismissing their argument with that insult. Their argument is dismissed because it has been thoroughly countered and the only thing they continue to defend it with are baseless fallacies. That's why they get insulted. It doesn't make that insult an ad hominem though. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/15 04:22 AM |
| 35 | They did it: Feminists are now claiming that the Lafayette theater shooting shows an "epidemic" of violence against women by 'white men'. And the shooter did so because of his "anti-feminist" views because once he said he was against abortion (as that apparently means you're anti-feminist)I've always had the feeling that he killed them partly because they were fat women, and therefore less valuable. That you took that amazing bullshit from a random armed robbery that went wrong, where the victims were completely random and happened to be women, is perfectly showing how truly insane you feminists are. ad hominem!!! Coming into the /r/mensrights subreddit and trying to blame half the population for the actions of a minority by using examples that contradict your own claims means yo… | /r/MensRights | 01/08/15 03:29 PM |
| 5 | Cosby's [Female] Lawyer: I'm Not Victim-Blaming, But "Women Have Responsibility [to report alleged rapes straight away]. We have responsibility for our bodies, we have responsibility for our decisions, we have responsibility for the way we conduct ourselves." Oh dear, she spoke the truth!What is the number now? 40? 40 accounts, half of which aren't claiming rape or drugging (such as the claim Bill Cosby kissed her at a party), in which NONE have evidence. But hey, 60 people could never lie about rape either, right? Oh, and i'm not sure how many times it needs to be pointed out to those desperate morons trying to grasp at the number of claims being presented as proof of each one of those claims being true or proof that they are "more likely" to be true but the MORE individual acc… | /r/MensRights | 01/08/15 03:01 PM |
| 44 | They did it: Feminists are now claiming that the Lafayette theater shooting shows an "epidemic" of violence against women by 'white men'. And the shooter did so because of his "anti-feminist" views because once he said he was against abortion (as that apparently means you're anti-feminist)but I don't think any of those killers killed men specifically because they hated and resented men Elliot Rodgers deliberately killed a bunch of men and killed more men than women. And was half asian. The Lane Bryant murders were specifically an armed robbery gone wrong in which a black man shot up the place and the only reason women were even killed at all was because they happened to be in the store, not because they were targeted for being women. Even the Amish school murders were because the… | /r/MensRights | 01/08/15 02:51 PM |
| 7 | Should the MRM be allying, or even associating, with the political right, i.e. traditional conservatives?Like feminists partnered with the fundamentalist anti-pornography Christian right during the 60's, 70's and 80's? No, no I think we're good. The Mens Rights Movement is for all people of all political leanings as long as they support rights for men. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/15 08:28 AM |
| 1 | Two female MMA fighters hold down and brutally beat up a guy outside a nightclub together because a woman claimed he touched her. No evidence he attacked them and neither have been banned or reprimanded by the league or police. Hypocrisy at it's finest.You have the right to self-defense. Which is not holding someone in incapacitation and then you and your friend directly viciously attacking them well beyond their incapacitation. Just as you can't punch someone in self-defense and then start kicking them as they're on the ground passed out. No self-defense law allows for this. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/15 01:04 AM |
| 8 | Two female MMA fighters hold down and brutally beat up a guy outside a nightclub together because a woman claimed he touched her. No evidence he attacked them and neither have been banned or reprimanded by the league or police. Hypocrisy at it's finest.Silly, they're women. The man was probably arrested. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 02:25 PM |
| 9 | Two female MMA fighters hold down and brutally beat up a guy outside a nightclub together because a woman claimed he touched her. No evidence he attacked them and neither have been banned or reprimanded by the league or police. Hypocrisy at it's finest."Welp, time to soccer kick someone in the groin" In the same interview in which they describe how they were sober and are "really good at holding themselves back" no less. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 02:23 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!Except the quote doesn't even say that! "Without a definitive law change" Sooo...yeah, it does. YOU'RE A TROLL! Great argument you've got there, i'm sure your downvotes did great at actually giving you an argument. Just like screaming "troll" did. That sure changed the law and even government ministers that refuted you. Yep. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 01:11 PM |
| 15 | Two female MMA fighters hold down and brutally beat up a guy outside a nightclub together because a woman claimed he touched her. No evidence he attacked them and neither have been banned or reprimanded by the league or police. Hypocrisy at it's finest.So the circumstances validate the assault because it was between two people who knew each other? Oh, i'm sorry, let me quote you... You do realise that male fighters get away with this shit all the time as well right? Where you specifically say that "male fighters get away with this shit all the time as well". Then give Floyd Mayweather as an example. An example in which there even being an attack is dubious. An example in which he is claimed to have attacked a partner in a private domestic viol… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 01:08 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!Nice cherry pick, you fucking dishonest fuckwit. It's the FIRST thing in your quote and it refutes you. The freakin' government stating they would need to change the laws to make it legal. You're really getting desperate aren't you. I-I dont believe this law is correct! I just continue to defend it and get angry when im refuted with the law stating its illegal! Okay. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 01:05 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!Russia. But nice fallacious deflection. Strange how the law directly refutes you but you can't actually back up your claim and i'm not even from your country. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:59 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!FIRST quote from your copypasta. "Without a definitive law change" They specify that they would need to change the law for it to be legal. And yet here you are quoting a guy breaking the law as the authority on the law, which refutes you, and on the government, which directly refuted him. [slow clap] Brava, continue that great fight against equality there. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:53 PM |
| 8 | Two female MMA fighters hold down and brutally beat up a guy outside a nightclub together because a woman claimed he touched her. No evidence he attacked them and neither have been banned or reprimanded by the league or police. Hypocrisy at it's finest.or is Floyd Mayweather not a real thing? Oh, this happens all the time? Please show us all these examples. Mayweather You mean his domestic violence dispute, that may not even have happened, in a private setting between two people who knew each other? Compared to a violent street bashing of a stranger by two people? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:50 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!"Without a definitive law change, many companies may be reluctant to act because it relies on them being confident that the 'special measures' argument applies in their case." So WITHOUT A CHANGE TO THE LAW it is determined that IT IS NOT LEGAL? Directly refuting your fucking claim? But nice copypasta of the article. Probably would've saved you some trouble since the very first quote has the government specifically stating that they would need to change the law for it to be applicable. didn't im… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:48 PM |
| -3 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!actions are not unusual nor is it illegal. You've been directly refuted regarding this. Which means your continued attempts to defend the illegal gender discrimination means you support sexism against men. /r/MensRights isn't really the best place for you to try and claim that gender discrimination against men is "totally legit you guyz". | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:45 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!That's a nice little twist. Especially when it's been specifically addressed repeatedly. Perhaps you can first explain how (a), (b) and (c), all of which specifically do not in any way relate to PAY but relate to EMPLOYMENT before trying that little deflection? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:44 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!The government is refusing to enact legislative amendments to make discrimination as proposed by ANZ easier. So they rejected it. And this is evidence to you that they support it? Even when the law refutes you? never said anything about supporting No, no, you just keep quoting them and applying it to your claim that it's legal. already in operation And illegal. As both the government and the law pointed out. I guess murder is also legal in your mind since it happens? No, sorry, that's not how th… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:42 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!It doesn't contain any prohibition on discrimination of any sort You do realize repeatedly ignoring where i've quoted it, since the beginning, isn't actually making it go away, right? 'An employer must not discriminate against an employee (a) by denying or limiting access by the employee to opportunities for promotion, transfer or training or to any other benefits connected with the employment' Section 18. Continuing to pretend i've not specifically pointed this out isn't really working. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:40 PM |
| -1 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!How the fuck am I a feminist? Desperately trying to defend sexism against men and then raging out when refuted with the facts? Yeah, sounds like you're a feminist. I-I HATE FEMINISM Then probably stop acting like a feminist and defending sexism, hmm? you think this is irrelevant As the Attorney General is not the government and has no say in laws...yes, what someone who is unrelated to the law or governing of the country outside of being a regulatory body that is inactive, that would make him th… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:39 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!Can you read! Can you? You've been directly refuted with the Act that completely shuts down your claim. Saying "oh look, someone is paying men less therefore it's not illegal" is probably the most absolutely absurd (lack of) argument you've attempted so far. I guess murder is legal because "people get away with murder". What he rejected What the government rejected was specifically applying that to labour laws. Which is the opposite of your "legal" claim since they didn't implement it. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:33 PM |
| 1 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!HAHAHAH What an inciful counter from you. how am I defending sexism You've repeatedly defended the clear and open sexism against men by paying them less than women. I'm afraid your deliberate ignorance isn't really going to work at this point. YOU'RE A TOOL! STRAWMAN You've been thoroughly refuted with the EOA. So crying about "strawmen" isn't going to actually give you an argument. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:30 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!(a) in the arrangements made for the purpose of determining who should be offered employment Which has nothing to do with pay. (b) in determining who should be offered employment Again, nothing to do with pay. (c) in the terms or conditions on which employment is offered. And once again, nothing to do with pay. Your deliberate fucking ignorance at this point is just astounding. You realize people can read, right? Comparing EMPLOYMENT to PAYMENT isn't just ignorance, you're deliberately lying. Th… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:28 PM |
| -1 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!Wow, how much of a cunt can you be? You've been repeatedly directly refuted with the section of the Act and you're now going to throw insults around like a piece of shit? Boy you feminists get angry at being refuted don't you. Like seriously, what the fuck is your problem? Not being a sexist fuck against men? Oh wait, no that's not a problem. Here's blah blah people who support sexist discrimination Uh, yeah, well done. I'm sure you'll cite Jessica Valenti next. they cite as justification Which … | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:25 PM |
| -1 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!There is no federal Equal Opportunity Act. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act of 1986. Getting pretty sick of your lies at this point. Which also includes: The Racial Discrimination Act, the Sex Discrimination Act, the Disability Discrimination Act and the Age Discrimination Act. They do not apply here as ANZ is a corporation. The pay discrimination laws apply to ALL employers and employees in Australia. That you're arguing against a country with the strictest labour laws in the w… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:21 PM |
| -1 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!The government specifically stating he's bullshit is a "precedent"? So rejecting it is now "supporting" it? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:15 PM |
| 1 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!Don't know what planet these people live in where they think pay discrimination against men would be illegal in Australia. Section 18 of the Equal Opportunity Act. It is illegal. Applying an unrelated law that isn't applicable to pay and wouldn't stand up in court as women are paid the exact same for the same work is deliberate ignorance at this point. It's pretty messed up here that we've got more than one person desperately trying to defend sexism against men like you are. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:14 PM |
| 2 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!The Sexual Discrimination Act applies to inequality and cannot apply by law to pay grades. This has been blatantly pointed out to you and at this point you're deliberately lying. For the SEA to apply in the first place, which it doesn't, it needs to: Actually relate to inequality. Which is a factually disprovable claim in court as women are paid the exact same for the same work as men. Not relate to exemptions. As it currently does not relate to payment, incentives or retirement. Under law. Sect… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:12 PM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!the rulings are published and are available on the net. What rulings? The law under section 18 of the Equal Opportunity Act is very specific that no gender discrimination can occur in pay. So show us where it states otherwise or you're just lying and claiming that it's okay because "vagina". read the rulings 'An employer must not discriminate against an employee (a) by denying or limiting access by the employee to opportunities for promotion, transfer or training or to any other benefits connect… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:08 PM |
| -1 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!Not in relation to pay under section 18 of the Equal Opportunity Act. That relates to: Areas of actual discrimination, which means the fact women are paid the exact same as men (a provable statement in a court of law) then they cannot apply it even if it was applicable. It relates to exemptions, not payment, incentives or retirement. The payment aspect of the act is very clear in regards to discrimination on gender and does not allow it under any circumstances. You're deliberately applying an un… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:04 PM |
| -1 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!And i'm sure you can quote the part you continue to claim exists, since section 18 of the Equal Opportunity Act directly refutes what you're saying. Under no circumstances is gender discrimination like this allowed. Special allowances does not apply to individual employee pay. Nor is it allowed even if it did because there is no inequality in this situation as women are paid the exact same for the same work and hours as men. Show us where already and stop lying. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 12:02 PM |
| 8 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!Not in relation to pay. No exemptions exist for gender discrimination, they would need to change the law to do so. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 10:25 AM |
| 20 | Two female MMA fighters hold down and brutally beat up a guy outside a nightclub together because a woman claimed he touched her. No evidence he attacked them and neither have been banned or reprimanded by the league or police. Hypocrisy at it's finest.he had it coming. Assuming they're not lying their asses off about what he did, they held him up and then both proceeded to violently beat him as he was incapacitated. It's not even allowed under the harshest Texas self-defense laws, let alone any other state. They trapped him and then beat him and then went on to justify it with saying "oh, I know when to not engage but he totally had it coming". | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 09:36 AM |
| -1 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!It allows for tribunals or the sex discrimination commisioner (ha-ha) to make basically arbitrary exemptions if it help the womens. No it doesn't. Show us where? The EOA specifically denies gender discrimination in pay, including for retirement, it doesn't state a protected class. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 09:19 AM |
| -1 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!but they explicitly allow for exemptions if it is good for the womens. Where? Where does it allow for that? Section 18 of the Equal Opportunity Act does not allow for gender discrimination in pay, work incentives or retirement funds. Australia is one of the highest regulated working countries in the world and has incredibly strict workers rights, equality and pay laws. Where does it allow for special privileges for women to be paid more for the same work? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 09:05 AM |
| 10 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!This actually needs to be the case. This is blatantly illegal under Australian law. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 08:22 AM |
| 0 | Australian bank falsely claimed women get paid less for the same work -- will now pay ALL female employees more than men in the exact same job. This is "positive" discrimination apparently!Isn't this...like insanely illegal under Australian law? As far as I know they don't have protected class laws, so it's illegal to pay differently for the same work and jobs for any sex. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 08:21 AM |
| 20 | Two female MMA fighters hold down and brutally beat up a guy outside a nightclub together because a woman claimed he touched her. No evidence he attacked them and neither have been banned or reprimanded by the league or police. Hypocrisy at it's finest.So I guess he had been asking for it. By their own claims, which are dubious until actual witnesses and reports come out, he "swung" at her. They proceeded to not just chokehold him and INCAPACITATE HIM but deliberately and knowingly punch him in the kidneys and sides while he was BEING HELD. THEN one jump kicked him in the groin. This goes beyond any self-defense laws. She didn't grab him or hit him once, they deliberately held him up to continue to attack him AFTER he was incapacitated. This w… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/15 08:10 AM |
| 3 | Obama on Cosby: "If you give a woman, or a man, for that matter, without his or her knowledge a drug and then have sex with them, that's rape." Nice that he included men.It's one thing to have a single accuser, it's another to have 35+ You know what? I'm going to even ignore the fact that half of those don't even make a claim of rape or drugging and give you 60 accusations of both individual assaults and witnesses to those assaults. Many of which defied physics. What about the fact that when more accusations against a high profile person or in a high profile case emerge, especially without evidence, the LESS likely they are to be true? What about the fact that m… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/15 03:20 AM |
| -1 | Obama on Cosby: "If you give a woman, or a man, for that matter, without his or her knowledge a drug and then have sex with them, that's rape." Nice that he included men.The possible scenarios in which Cosby is not a serial-rapist who preyed on young women is getting slimmer and slimmer. The ONLY thing that has come up recently in relation to Cosby that is causing all this hysterical "guilty" bullshit is a document that says the woman ASKED for and KNOWINGLY TOOK Quaaludes. The fucking "slimmer and slimmer" lie is from the same media outlets rehashing the exact same stories over and over again and making them worse each time. Problem is that each "new" revelatio… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/15 03:07 AM |
| -1 | Obama on Cosby: "If you give a woman, or a man, for that matter, without his or her knowledge a drug and then have sex with them, that's rape." Nice that he included men.How does a woman asking for, receiving and then knowingly voluntarily taking a recreational drug have any relevance to what Obama is saying? It's pretty messed up so many of this sub, even mods, aren't defending the fact no actual evidence has been given to show he raped anyone. I've always hated Cosby but that doesn't mean he shouldn't get due process and not be defended against false allegations. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/15 03:00 AM |
| 0 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsyou're moving the goalposts. Oh dear, even after I directly refute you with the laws and you spend the last three posts screaming and not actually countering anything, now it's suddenly "you're moving the goal posts!"... Lets see here: I directly ask for evidence of this "enormous amount of evidence" Bill Cosby drugged and raped women. Pointing out that the **document used as "proof" he did so directly contradicts the claims of forced drugging and mentions nothing of rape. Instead of presenting … | /r/MensRights | 24/07/15 06:02 AM |
| -1 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsSJW's claiming that a claim is evidence of it's claim being true and that this is enough to convict someone of rape. What a time to be alive... | /r/MensRights | 24/07/15 04:14 AM |
| -1 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsomg nuh uh you're wrong Two sources detailing the law refuting you and go "YOU read it!"... And you pull this is in your attempt to argue that in a court of law the claims themselves are evidence of their own claims even if literally no other evidence exist. No, SJW, just no. A claim is NOT evidence of itself. It is hearsay and inadmissible in court. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/15 04:05 AM |
| 1 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsI stopped reading here. Oh boy, a SJW stopped reading when they were refuted. You have no idea what you're talking about. Problem is that as much as you refuse to accept it, feels don't beat reals. An accusation is not evidence in court of that accusation unless it's it corroborated. The same applies to testimony that is an independant accusation whose sole claim to evidence is itself. They are, by LAW, declared HEARSAY and are INADMISSIBLE in court. An accusation can be entered into evidence as… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/15 03:14 AM |
| 0 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsI never pointed to that document. Probably shouldn't pull that bullshit while screaming about him being guilty of rape in a thread about that very topic. Contrary to what you may think, testimony is evidence Contrary to what you feel, the law refutes you regarding testimony being used as the sole evidence of itself. It's called hearsay and is inadmissible. As is repeatedly pointed out to your lot who continue that idiocy. Many people testifying to the exact same thing Which they're not. They are… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/15 02:19 AM |
| 0 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsAh yes, ranting about how it's somehow an attack on women. No, you know, evidence as was asked. But I'm sure that repeated fallacy will somehow turn into evidence at some point, right? Because Bill Cosby isn't required to prove his innocence. The accuser is required to provide evidence for their claim, as a claim is not evidence of itself. Especially enough to convict. So when you parade a court document stating these women asked for, received and the knowingly took drugs as "evidence of forced … | /r/MensRights | 24/07/15 12:50 AM |
| 2 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsYou have evidence this occured? Take your desperate feminist apologetics somewhere else. The proven rape of underage children doesn't magically turn a claim of rape into evidence of rape. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/15 12:40 AM |
| 1 | Are they wounded female veterans or models with prosthetic limbs?Why is this relevant? It's an SRS thread and it has absolutely nothing to do with Men's Rights. Downvote and report. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/15 06:02 AM |
| 1 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsAs for Cosby, he is probably guilty of something. Two dozen unconnected accusers all lying is, far as i know, unprecedented. Claiming that Americas most prolific serial rapist is a black guy who drugged and raped scores of (predominantly white) women during the racist civil rights eras for decades and not a single one of them has a shred of evidence to prove it is unprecedented. Multiple people jumping on a high profile case for money and fame is not. In fact the more people make accusations (es… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/15 06:00 AM |
| 1 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsa basis for reasonable belief" And a basis for "reasonable belief" is not contradictory, countered or physically impossible stories that only have their word it occurred. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/15 05:29 AM |
| 2 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsBill Cosby had possible sex with young models? This is what qualifies for evidence of rape now on /r/MensRights? And stop with the downvoting. If you haven't got evidence you can't just hide the posts pointing that out. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/15 05:27 AM |
| 2 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsYou're the one claiming you have evidence. So how about you present it since the burden of proof is not on us to disprove nonexistent evidence? | /r/MensRights | 23/07/15 05:25 AM |
| 1 | Judd Apatow: ‘We shouldn't need Bill Cosby to admit it’ -- Director wonders why we need comedian’s admission to believe alleged victimsThere is an enormous amount of evidence that Cosby drugged women for sex. Oh PLEASE do fucking PRESENT it then? Because you'll be the FIRST user to do so. Because I'm pretty damn sure that asking for, receiving and then knowingly voluntarily taking a recreational party drug during the 70's is the opposite of proving someone was forcibly drugged and definitely doesn't prove anyone was raped. Or will you spout off that a woman claiming they were raped is the only proof you need that she was raped?… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/15 05:24 AM |
| 6 | Are they wounded female veterans or models with prosthetic limbs?OP is a month old account and their first post was 9 hours ago making this thread. They haven't replied and they only have two comments to their entire account. This thread is both unrelated to Men's Rights and has a dubious high upvote count for few comments (nearly all of which are calling this out for not being related to MR) and doesn't present a title or subject that would even justify scroll by upvotes. It's an SRS/SJW brigade thread. We know we've been hit by these in the last week with t… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/15 05:15 AM |
| 13 | This issue seriously makes me want to stop coming to this sub. I'm a full believer in the need for a men's rights movement but this specific issue really makes me question if it's viable just nowONE user mentions being white ONCE in a REPLY, not a thread or even remotely the TOP rated comment and you make an ENTIRE thread attacking this sub for being "racist" (that you think simply mentioning that white males are dismissed as being able to suffer is "racist" is showing how much of a moron you are) solely because you got downvoted for attacking a user who mentioned it? Is this the best you SJW's can pull? That somehow a minority of users mentioning on occasion that white people can have … | /r/MensRights | 22/07/15 12:54 AM |
| 4 | Feminist says she would rape a man were crime legal; her boyfriend calls her out on her bullshitGuys makes a double entendre using words being spoken on stage at the time because they are tech terms and forking a dongle is actually a thing in a private conversation and they get fired. Famous feminist blatantly states she would rape a guy, detailing in no uncertain terms she truly would rape a random guy because she thought it would be fun, on video and no-one hears peep. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/15 02:17 AM |
| 2 | Feminist says she would rape a man were crime legal; her boyfriend calls her out on her bullshithttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Kay_Akana | /r/MensRights | 18/07/15 05:06 PM |
| 19 | Feminist says she would rape a man were crime legal; her boyfriend calls her out on her bullshitsince all of you are blaming "feminists" for your problems again A famous feminist Youtuber describes in detail that she would really, genuinely like to rape someone and you're now not just trying to claim she's not a feminist but that it was a "joke"? Pathetic. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/15 03:55 PM |
| 81 | Feminist says she would rape a man were crime legal; her boyfriend calls her out on her bullshitOh...FUCK...are you FUCKING KIDDING ME??? And this is what she states ON the video this is in relation to. She blatantly declares that "rape prevention" for men is to teach them "not force themselves on someone". So in the response to the video in which she clearly states she wants to rape a man she pulls the "teach men not to rape" bullshit? Did I mention that this feminist has a MILLION Youtube subscribers, over 100 million views and made the, no you can't even make this shit up, hit feminist … | /r/MensRights | 18/07/15 02:59 PM |
| 5 | The PBSIdeas guy made another video in response to the comments refuting him over his 'Three Laws of the Internet' "egalitarianism is a mens rights project" idiocy. Still manages the same level of ignorant bullshit trying to justify his lies.I don't think he was being a ignorant fool at all Apart from where he not just turned half his video into a ridiculous strawman about another video but continued to defend his previous claims without actually admitting he was wrong, even pretending that statistics are a poor argument when he was refuted about the pay gap. At one point he defended the fallacy that "any comments on an article about feminism justify feminism by first redefining that claim to mean "oh, that only meant some maybe bad… | /r/MensRights | 18/07/15 01:48 PM |
| 15 | The Girl from That Viral Catcalling Video Is Now Suing the Filmmaker Who Made Her Famous for $500k.The best part is that she also played into that bullshit after and tried to pretend she was oppressed for speaking out. Sorry sweetie, you can't play the victim on one side and expect to be the victim on the other as well. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/15 03:56 AM |
| 5 | The Girl from That Viral Catcalling Video Is Now Suing the Filmmaker Who Made Her Famous for $500k.It really sounds like she thinks she should get $500K because she really wants $500K So she's a feminist? | /r/MensRights | 17/07/15 03:55 AM |
| 9 | Starbucks bathroom choices - unisex or female.Doesn't work the other way. So it would still be illegal. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/15 04:04 AM |
| 0 | Gawker claims Pao was fired because she's a woman, links to multiple posts sitting on zero or negative karma and (you guessed it) manages to blame Men's Rights for her removal as wellFor the same reasons we don't link to SRS. We don't link to SRS because other subs take care of that, it contravenes Reddits rules and there is little need to link to every comment against men's right. By linking to them we're giving them time of day. That specifically doesn't happen with an ARCHIVE. Whether we avoid giving them click revenue or not It's not a maybe matter, an archive flat out doesn't give them click revenue. It's why it's allowed. we're still dignifying their bullshit with a re… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/15 01:29 AM |
| 64 | Starbucks bathroom choices - unisex or female.Isn't this illegal? Aren't they required by law to have equal access for both sexes or only have a unisex bathroom? | /r/MensRights | 16/07/15 12:06 AM |
| 1 | Gawker claims Pao was fired because she's a woman, links to multiple posts sitting on zero or negative karma and (you guessed it) manages to blame Men's Rights for her removal as wellHow the fuck is that different? Because the entire reason we don't link directly is so that we don't give them traffic or click money. What the fuck did you think the rule was for? That we'd have to wait until some other source covered a hit piece on the MRM? | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 11:54 PM |
| 1 | Debunking the wage gap in 30 secondsBut doesn't "wage" imply the rate at which one is paid. Are you saying teachers and CEO's don't have a yearly or monthly salary? | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 12:07 PM |
| 8 | Gawker claims Pao was fired because she's a woman, links to multiple posts sitting on zero or negative karma and (you guessed it) manages to blame Men's Rights for her removal as wellBut my Mens Sexy Movement! | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 11:55 AM |
| 16 | Obama: "We should not be tolerating rape in prison" and no prison rape jokes.Iran can go back to attempting to build a nuclear bomb? What bomb? The bomb they haven't been making since they first signed the non-proliferation treaty and directly complied with all of its requirements and was still met with sanctions? Or are you one of those people who actually believed the refuted crap about Iran building a nuclear weapon because they were building nuclear power plants as is their right under the non-proliferation treaty. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 11:49 AM |
| 4 | Obama: "We should not be tolerating rape in prison" and no prison rape jokes.Every single republican and a good deal of independents hate Obama's guts. But the American people love him. And a current President with a huge popularity rating advocating against his parties wishes for the popular peoples candidate is a huge boost. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 11:47 AM |
| 0 | Obama: "We should not be tolerating rape in prison" and no prison rape jokes.Are you just looking for an excuse to give Obama praise? No. In fact I think it's ridiculous how Americans have latched onto him and ignored his disgusting overreaches in power that will set back freedom in the United States by decades. But my point is that recently, as his term comes to an end, he has radically shifted from the pandering he was doing during the first term and first half of his second term. His deals with Iran have gone against the grain of the entire American political lobby. T… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 11:46 AM |
| 22 | Gawker claims Pao was fired because she's a woman, links to multiple posts sitting on zero or negative karma and (you guessed it) manages to blame Men's Rights for her removal as wellI tend to see the vast, overwhelming majority of internet users are secular when it comes to the net. They will hate another group with a passion, raid, doxx, look up fucked up porn, post pictures of kittens, hate the world, love the world, use it to educate, use it to indoctrinate...but the moment anyone threatens a group in a way that puts all other users at risk of being suppressed, censored or denied access to what they want then they all unite against it. Feminists and right wing conservati… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 07:21 AM |
| 17 | Obama: "We should not be tolerating rape in prison" and no prison rape jokes.I have noticed he's really picked up on actual good shit right before his term ends. The Iran deal for one. It would be good of he flat out rejected Hilary around the end and threw his support for Bernie Sanders as well. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 07:16 AM |
| 46 | Gawker claims Pao was fired because she's a woman, links to multiple posts sitting on zero or negative karma and (you guessed it) manages to blame Men's Rights for her removal as wellWe did it! | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 07:14 AM |
| 13 | Gawker claims Pao was fired because she's a woman, links to multiple posts sitting on zero or negative karma and (you guessed it) manages to blame Men's Rights for her removal as wellYes but do you hate enough?! | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 07:12 AM |
| 1 | Why do MRA's attack feminism? - new Girlwriteswhat videoYou disagree with something I've never said and then downvoted me for it (yes, I know it was you, I was just scrolling through my posts and saw it was on 1 still when I saw the alert for this message)? I just specifically stated feminism is against equality. And unless you think Nixon shouldn't be Breadsident, it appears you're just an idiot. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 06:28 AM |
| 1 | Divorced couple fighting in court over frozen embryos: Waiving Future Child support has no legal meaning.I'm not decided on this. Yes, she did sign an agreement. But if she can no longer pick up men in her old age, I think she has a right to deny her husband a divorce. Just make him not financially responsible for her. End of story. This is how ridiculous you sound right now. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 04:41 AM |
| 13 | Debunking the wage gap in 30 seconds"A teacher and a CEO have a wage gap. A male teacher and a female teacher doing the same work in the same position at the same company do not." | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 03:56 AM |
| 3 | Why do MRA's attack feminism? - new Girlwriteswhat videobut DO NOT work with them Did you forget we work with Sommers and Farrell? They're both feminists. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 03:49 AM |
| 9 | Why do MRA's attack feminism? - new Girlwriteswhat videoWe attack those who are against equality and who attack the rights of men. This just happens to be feminism. We've shown we will happily work with and support any feminists who support equality and don't attack men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/15 02:59 AM |
| 11 | [Discussion] Is there actually instances where MRA'sor the MRM have done or lobbied for something bad?where's the evidence Bingo. There isn't any. I used to be a feminist before I became an MRA. I kept being told the terrible things MRA's did but could never find any. So I looked. I searched and clicked on what little sources feminist articles and they inevitably linked back to the same articles claiming it was true "because". After a while I realized how fucked up so many feminists and feminist institutions were. But hey, feminism was about "equality for women". I-It was j-ust all these loud mo… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/15 04:48 AM |
| 1 | Reinstate De'Andre Johnson, stop blaming for being a victim of assault and defending himself[Video evidence refutes your claim] hurrrr you mad bra!!! Elbows on desks!! | /r/MensRights | 10/07/15 12:32 AM |
| 1 | Reinstate De'Andre Johnson, stop blaming for being a victim of assault and defending himselfThe raising of her fist is questionable ... ... ... ...it's on camera, you dense fucker. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/15 02:14 PM |
| 2 | Two separate articles from The Guardian today"Stop referring to female humans in one of the many basic social terms for a female human!" | /r/MensRights | 09/07/15 02:11 PM |
| 4 | The top female model made $42 million last year while the top male model only made $1.5 million. Its time to close this wage gap! /sarcasmDidn't a male high school team beat a womens professional team some years ago in a display match? | /r/MensRights | 09/07/15 02:01 PM |
| 1 | The top female model made $42 million last year while the top male model only made $1.5 million. Its time to close this wage gap! /sarcasm1 billion viewers for the Mens World Cup. A little over a 100 million for the Womens World Cup. But yeah, they should totally be paid the exact same, right? | /r/MensRights | 09/07/15 02:00 PM |
| 1 | The top female model made $42 million last year while the top male model only made $1.5 million. Its time to close this wage gap! /sarcasmThis is the same freakin' reference in every thread about male models! How does nobody see this?! I FEEL LIKE I'M TAKING CRAZY PILLS! | /r/MensRights | 09/07/15 01:57 PM |
| 2 | Just banned from /r/CFB for saying that a player had the right to defend himself against a woman who was closed fist punching him in the face and kicking him in the balls in a thread on that topic. No warning, I didn't break any rules, just banned.Apparently asking if they would let a guy punch them like that gets you banned. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/15 02:16 PM |
| 2 | Just banned from /r/CFB for saying that a player had the right to defend himself against a woman who was closed fist punching him in the face and kicking him in the balls in a thread on that topic. No warning, I didn't break any rules, just banned.There's very little leniency for people who only show up to brigade Oh, i'm sure you're going to point out where in my post above I "brigaded"? Saying a guy defended himself is now "brigading"? that's why the mod comment in that thread specifically warned brigading commenters to go back to the subreddit they came from. I didn't come from this subreddit. I searched posts for this subject when I saw it and it came up there, so I discussed it on topic without breaking any of the rules. I'm sure you… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/15 02:15 PM |
| 1 | Woman at bar punches FSU quarterback. News goes on to talk about what a bad person HE is.These clauses usually have a section that requires the player to behave in such a way as to prevent any negative publicity from reflecting on the team. Wouldn't this fall under Unconscionable Contract in US law since there is absolutely no way for him to avoid negative publicity in a scenario he didn't create or cause? | /r/MensRights | 07/07/15 01:25 PM |
| 1 | Just banned from /r/CFB for saying that a player had the right to defend himself against a woman who was closed fist punching him in the face and kicking him in the balls in a thread on that topic. No warning, I didn't break any rules, just banned.I have, no reply. And there's no misunderstanding. Nothing I stated could've been a bannable offense, especially when the other user stated the same (but opposite) and hasn't had their posts deleted or been banned. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/15 01:19 PM |
| 3 | Woman at bar punches FSU quarterback. News goes on to talk about what a bad person HE is.It is just absolutely disgusting that he was immediately kicked off of his team for this. Is there any legal ramifications for the school or breach of contract? There's no way the school can declare him legally defending himself after being violently attacked to be in any remote way in breach of their charter or contract he signed. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/15 11:57 AM |
| 147 | Sarah Jessica Parker says she’s a humanist, not a feministAttacked by feminists who demand she not think a different way than them in 3...2...1... | /r/MensRights | 07/07/15 11:55 AM |
| -3 | Cosby admits to rape in 2005BREAKING NEWS: Women admit to asking Bill Cosby for quaaludes in the 70's and then voluntarily taking them! Doesn't have the same feminist outrage ring to it, does it? How many of these rape cases have to be proven to be a hoax before these idiots stop pushing bullshit. "Look at all these women", many of whom have already had their claims refuted, many of whom aren't even making claims of rape but are being lumped in as rape victims, thousands of dollars demanded for their stories and paid out. … | /r/MensRights | 07/07/15 09:15 AM |
| -1 | Is anyone else a little disturbed that multiple threads/news stories stating Bill Cosby has "admitted" to drugging and raping women are based solely on those women saying they KNOWINGLY took the quaaludes off of him?but with 30+ people accusing him I'd need to recap the exact allegations and those involved but if I remember; multiple women have already been exposed as frauds (I know Cosby recently completely refuted a claim by a former Playboy bunny that he raped her by proving he wasn't anywhere near the Playboy Mansion when she claimed it occurred. This woman also lied that her and 12 other girls there were raped by him, so I don't know if they were erroneously added to this "30" number), many of the wome… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/15 09:04 AM |
| 1 | Is anyone else a little disturbed that multiple threads/news stories stating Bill Cosby has "admitted" to drugging and raping women are based solely on those women saying they KNOWINGLY took the quaaludes off of him?I'm sure you can actually back up your rapist claim with evidence, right? Seeing this is a thread specifically about how people are calling him a rapist despite the very evidence they're using showing he is innocent of the claims about drugging women to rape them. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/15 04:05 AM |
| 1 | The domestic violence double standard of Hope Solo, the goalkeeper of the USA's women's football team.Do any Americans know the last Men's World Cup viewer numbers for America? The usual suspects in media outlets are pushing the new narrative really hard that womens sports need to be paid the exact same for men's sports, despite the fact the top ranking teams aren't as good as the top ranking male teams and pull in far, far less money. All I can find is the last worls wide viewe statistics which numbers a little over a billion viewers. While the USA has 26million-ish and from what I've seen of w… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/15 01:07 AM |
| 2 | “Signs Feminism Is A Cult”Ignore them. They're one of the SRS'er feminists that has come in to brigade over the Australian thread. They keep coming into threads and spouting nonsense and then ranting that "this is why people don't support MRA's!!" before pretending to storm off. They managed to make multiple rants about pets (you know, non-humans) being given more domestic violence shelter funding than men and claim that pointing that out means Mens Rights is "against equality" and opposes women. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 02:21 PM |
| 4 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.Right men being a minority you fucking idiot is down to the world. Men and Woman make up roughly a 50 percent split. 49.2% men to 50.8% women in the United States 49.1% men to 50.9% women in Germany 48.4% men to 51.6% women in France 49.3% men to 50.7% women in the UK 49.6% men to 50.4% women in Canada 49.8% men to 50.2% women in Australia So yes, actually, it seems men are a minority in relation to women in the Western world. So you've been refuted regarding that. As for the rest you are a tota… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 02:17 PM |
| 7 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.No I am not saying that, not sure where you are getting all that from, you just put words n my mouth and are trying to shape this towards yourself, quite unrelenting Well, thankyou for narrowing down exactly what you're talking about from my post that apparently I "put words in your mouth" over...despite quoting you directly each time. I never said because men aren't the minority That's a nice revision. Here's your direct quote: "we men are hardly a minority now are we". That wasn't even really … | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 12:12 PM |
| 5 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.Now it's relentless, post after post of crap Oh yes, men being worth less than dogs to the Australian government in terms of domestic violence funding is clearly something nobody should care about. It's just "crap". we men are hardly a minority now are we Nor are women. In fact women are in the majority in relation to men. In relation to domestic violence, men make up nearly half of domestic violence victims. So are you claiming mens issues don't matter because they aren't as minority as...somet… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 11:06 AM |
| 2 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.Oh, you're still going? I wonder if you'll actually present an argument this time... I said that is how the movement is perceived. It's true. What was the last big MRA story in the media? "MRAs calling for a boycott of Mad Max". My comments are about how you approach the issue And right off we have you trying to spin blatant lies about MRA's as somehow the fault of MRA's for "acting that way". It's fairly obvious at this point that you're one of the many feminist brigaders who attempted to shitp… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 05:58 AM |
| 0 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.The fact that men are worth less than dogs in relation to domestic violence shelter funding from the Australian government is untrue because... Dogs can't vote? Feminist logic. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 05:24 AM |
| 1 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.I'm still responding as honestly as I can Oh boy... I won't apologise for retaining a skeptical position You haven't presented a skeptical position. You've presented a strawman and a claim that has been countered. asking questions You complained about something that was already countered in the OP and then went on a strawman rant. and asking for evidence It's your burden to provide evidence men receive no funding for domestic violence shelters in Australia from the government, since it's not our… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 05:11 AM |
| 1 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.Give them time. They're nearly at that stage in the thread about this in /r/Australia | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 04:01 AM |
| 2 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.As an aside, I think the approach in this sub is counter productive Oh yes, clearly pointing out facts as you fallaciously strawman redundant or refuted arguments shows the sub is the problem here. All I've done so far is ask some honest questions Asking the same refuted "questions" as a pile of spamming idiots also do so is something to forgive. It's not so much when your own claims are shut down in the OP. It's definitely not when you then deliberately attempt to strawman some nonsense while d… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 04:00 AM |
| 2 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.it's still wrong And AGAIN, we keep waiting for you feminist brigaders to actually back up that repeatedly refuted claim that it's wrong. but that's because women are substantially more likely to suffer from domestic violence than men are. That men receive less (zero) domestic violence shelter funding than pets, thus showing that in relation to domestic violence funding men are worth less than dogs in Australia is somehow wrong because... "Women are more likely to be victims"? This is the insane… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 03:50 AM |
| 0 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.but the title didn't qualify it What I just stated is less qualifying that the title of the OP. Again, explain how what was said was untrue? | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 02:20 AM |
| 3 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.AAAGH AAAGH YOU'RE LYING No, I'm summarizing your logic given your replies to exactly what I've stated. You're ranting about soup kitchens as an argument against people opposing dogs being given more funding for domestic violence shelters than the zero men get. It's absurd levels of feminist logic. And as I've pointed out, I'm Russian, soup kitchens are what we do. I've likely served far more than you ever have and I'm not trying to use it as my sole argument in defense of funding for men. Now r… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 02:18 AM |
| 4 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.There have been numerous stories on this sub where the male was beat to shit , obvious cuts and bruises , and yet when the police show up they arrest him Duluth model FTFY | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 02:06 AM |
| 3 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.There's not a single person who opposes what they're trying to do here. The only issue people have is that dogs are getting funding and men are still refused it. Whereas those feminists deriding the thread actually oppose the very idea that men need funding for domestic violence. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 02:04 AM |
| 2 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs."80% of the people I serve in soup kitchens are men, that's why you should stop opposing the fact men receive no government funding for domestic violence compared to dogs" - Feminist logic | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 02:02 AM |
| 2 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.I'm Russian. Soup kitchens are what we do. But great illogical (lack of) argument you've got there. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 01:18 AM |
| 2 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.You can't say "again" We can when this isn't the first time some feminist has claimed that idiocy in this thread. Again, tell us how it is false in relation to what was stated? You need to be incredibly thick to believe that Australia has 0 shelters that accommodate men And AGAIN you thick headed feminist, provide evidence where men's domestic violence shelters exist and are funded by the government in Australia? You'd think for the amount of times you people are raging about this you would at l… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 01:13 AM |
| 7 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.You should take a look at the /r/Australia thread on this. The mods have had to repeatedly delete abusive feminist post after feminist post because when I pointed out this very thing they began ranting that it was somehow an "attack on women". It's seriously fucked up how they are offended at the very idea men can suffer. Shows how messed up their ideology is. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 12:13 AM |
| 3 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.saving people Did you read the article? Oh hooray! Men too can seek shelters for their pets in domestic violence situations! ...problem comes when men don't have any domestic violence shelters to go to as well. It's strange how much you feminist idiots keep trying to shitpost and brigade these threads while deliberately leaving that part out. Even though it's addressed in the OP and throughout this thread. Need a recap for your irrelevant quote you tried to play off as countering this thread in … | /r/MensRights | 06/07/15 12:06 AM |
| 3 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.Again, please tell us exactly how it's false. In Australia men receive zero funding for domestic violence shelters, while pets receive $100,000. In relation to domestic violence funding, men are now literally worth less than dogs. Unless you think zero dollars is more than one hundred thousand dollars? | /r/MensRights | 05/07/15 11:54 PM |
| 3 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.In relation to government funded programs you complain that we should fund it privately? | /r/MensRights | 05/07/15 11:52 PM |
| 2 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.I thought you were saying that legislation expressly excluded men. You quoted me specifically stating funding. So that's a NO, men DON'T receive any funding? Because nothing in what you state relates to funding for domestic violence. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/15 10:51 PM |
| 5 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.In relation to domestic violence funding, men are now officially worth less than dogs. How is that untrue? | /r/MensRights | 05/07/15 10:51 PM |
| 21 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.A woman was murdered back in April after being turned away from refuges up to a dozen times due to state government homelessness reforms. And yet still receive tens of millions in funding. Your complaint, in relation to how fucking PETS are receiving more money than the FUCKING ZERO DOLLARS that men receive, is to complain that "women had some funding cut" from their shelters? So womens shelters had a few million cut from their tens of millions funding and now have to bunk with homeless, who bar… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/15 02:41 PM |
| 257 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.That disgusting end sentence: The Men’s Referral Service provides anonymous and confidential telephone counselling, information and referrals to men to help them take action to stop using violent and controlling behaviour 1300 766 491. Thanks Guardian, i'm sure men will appreciate calling up a helpline solely for abusers so that their pet will be safe while they go back to their female partner violently attacking them and their children. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/15 02:15 PM |
| 26 | Australia to give $100,000 to provide shelter for pets of women in domestic violence situations. Men still receive no funding at all for any level of help to escape domestic violence from women. In Australia men are now worth less than dogs.Can you show the legislation that says this, because I can't find it. Prove a negative? No thankyou. But feel free to provide evidence that men do receive funding for domestic violence shelters in Australia. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/15 02:10 PM |
| 5 | Prominent Feminist Julie Burchill’s son Jack (29) commits suicideOh boy, we're angry because a young guy killed himself and all evidence points to his mother contributing to it and worse still, she promoted a feminist ideology that mocked and dismissed male suicide for countless other men? Our bad. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/15 10:27 PM |
| 9 | Prominent Feminist Julie Burchill’s son Jack (29) commits suicideWAAAAH WAAAH THESE MEN ARE MAKING FUN OF SUICIDE! No, you pathetic feminist bitch, we are lambasting the fact this woman treated her children like this, dismissed the very idea men could be depressed or have a huge problem with suicide and then more than likely made sure this poor fucking guy thought he had absolutely no outlet for help and killed himself. We're attack her for her comments. We are shedding tears for this poor guy that he ever had to go through being raised to think he was worthl… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/15 12:15 PM |
| 20 | Prominent Feminist Julie Burchill’s son Jack (29) commits suicideWell, if the men who manage football think that 545 under-24 male suicides a year is a more frightening statistic than two women killed each week - and hundreds of thousands injured every year - by the men they live with, then they must be even stupider than they look; though it's hard to imagine, I know. But I can't help feeling they're on very dodgy ground, taking on the young male suicide thing. For a start, it's a phony panic, catering to that lowest of modern male desires - to be a victim -… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/15 10:52 AM |
| 11 | DailyBeast writes entire article about how they will be praising in coverage Jennifer Garner SOLELY because she's a woman getting a divorce. Despite the divorce between Afleck and her being amicable and no reason to choose sides.Nobody 'attacked' anyone in that article. I'm not sure why you'd come in personally trying to attack me because I posted a thread about a media outlet attacking a man solely because he's the male in a divorce. Here's the fucking article, since you clearly didn't read it before coming in here to derail and troll (as I can see you've been doing to a bunch of other /r/mensrights threads from your post history): And so I am here to tell you which is the correct team. It is Team Jen. Decided upon aft… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/15 08:18 AM |
| 14 | DailyBeast writes entire article about how they will be praising in coverage Jennifer Garner SOLELY because she's a woman getting a divorce. Despite the divorce between Afleck and her being amicable and no reason to choose sides.A public statement by a major media outlet to attack, choose sides against a male actor SOLELY because the partner is a woman has nothing to do with men? No, sorry, it does. The public proclaimation of a media outlet to praise someone entirely because she's a woman and to oppose someone entirely because he's a man in a divorce is very much related to men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/15 07:18 AM |
| 1 | I am a former mod of tumblrinaction who has been around SJ activists for over three years and this microaggressions list is easily in the top 10 most ridiculous instances of this ideology I've ever seenNo, no, because then that would make feminists look bad because they constantly advocate thinking men are all potential rapists. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/15 03:26 AM |
| 1 | I am a former mod of tumblrinaction who has been around SJ activists for over three years and this microaggressions list is easily in the top 10 most ridiculous instances of this ideology I've ever seenDid they just say that homosexual men are not the same as other males at the end there? Because I'm pretty sure you can't disparage the male gender and think that insult doesn't apply to gay men. These SJW idiots are microaggressioning their own microaggression list. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/15 03:23 AM |
| 0 | Conan on sexismIt's amazing that for all their sociology, English, arts and psychology degrees...feminists don't understand what context is. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/15 03:07 AM |
| 1 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.I'm sorry, sending unasked That hilarious revisionism doesn't tend to hold up when she was the one who originally posted unsolicited nudes on a public Facebook wall. The nudes she posted without permission were asking for more after they provided some of their own and flirted with her. So she posted a nude. They did the same. Yet here you are attacking them while trying to defend her. Hence the hypocrisy everyone is pointing out. If they are "harassing" her by asking her out or if she could prov… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/15 01:16 AM |
| 0 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned....they harassed her They send non-harassing flirting and suggestive posts to her once after she stated she had no issue with such posts and "bring it on". by sending her these photos So the girls she originally complained about were "harassing" guys by sending them their photos and sexually explicit texts? And they don't get banned Yeah, they did. Likely permanently too, despite probably never having been banned before and doing it through private message. She gets banned for exposing them No, … | /r/MensRights | 23/06/15 10:46 PM |
| 2 | 25 MORE made up examples of "Male Privilege" by those 'totally not misandrist' feministsMen are the ones who refuse to get mental help. Strange. Men tried to have a mental health convention and received bomb threats and picketing by feminists. Please, do go on... Men are the ones who are more likely to drop out of treatment. Men would need to have access to that treatment in order to "drop out". Men are the ones who perpetrated that No, both men and women do that. Problem is that it's also feminists pulling the gender specific deregation against men as well. "men are strong, pull y… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/15 10:42 PM |
| 5 | 25 MORE made up examples of "Male Privilege" by those 'totally not misandrist' feministsYes but male suicide is apparently something men should man up about. But female suicide, that statistically far less prevalent problem, is totally something that needs to be addressed right now. Usually by cutting the funding for men. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/15 06:19 AM |
| 8 | 25 MORE made up examples of "Male Privilege" by those 'totally not misandrist' feministsIt's pretty ridiculous they keep trying to use people assuming a woman going through a physically consistent cycle of emotional and hormonal spikes once a month as somehow other people being sexist. If you are on mental medication and act outside of your normal, people will assume you are having problems with your medication. If you are normally rational and sane and then randomly act irrational during the time your usually on your period, yes people will suspect that's the reason. If it's not, … | /r/MensRights | 23/06/15 05:53 AM |
| 0 | 25 MORE made up examples of "Male Privilege" by those 'totally not misandrist' feministsWhat does an attack on men using sexist strawmen and repeated fallacies regarding a non-existent privilege list comprised of an absurd level of bullshit have to do with men's rights? Strange that a thread like this managed to pull a random users account, with page after page of non-existent posting onto /r/mensrights, out of nowhere to complain about it not relating to this sub (when it's specifically tagged "feminism") a little over 10 minutes after it was posted. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/15 05:26 AM |
| 8 | Lena Dunham claims that women are rejecting feminism because they were "tricked" into thinking it was bad because as young girls and haven't been properly educated yetIt's really refreshing to see the uproar when shit like this is posted on Facebook, even from feminists, all attacking the page for pushing Lena Dunham. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/15 11:46 AM |
| 2 | Lena Dunham claims that women are rejecting feminism because they were "tricked" into thinking it was bad because as young girls and haven't been properly educated yetEh. I personally think its less bullying and more her being carefully managed and manufactured to be profitable. It's gotta suck for her handlers. They must be going "NO! DON'T TOUCH THAT FEMINIST SHIT! IT'LL BACKFIRE ON US!" And now she's gone into a really obnoxious slump that's gone full feminazi and it's cutting into her sales. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/15 11:43 AM |
| 11 | Lena Dunham claims that women are rejecting feminism because they were "tricked" into thinking it was bad because as young girls and haven't been properly educated yetbut a 23 year-old making an award winning independent film, grossing $400,000 on a $60,000 budget, is amazing. Aaaahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Having your rich family finance the entire thing and then having her friends and family star in it for no money, doesn't make you a great film maker nor "struggling". The 2006 Lassie remake made over 200K it's first weekend. It took Dunham, and much more of her families money promoting it, to get over the most basic opening numbers for 5 weeks before it m… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/15 11:38 AM |
| 3 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned."photos" "images" Yes, it did. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/15 05:57 AM |
| 3 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned."her move to publish the names and messages of dudes sending their own NSFW photos to her account." The highlighted link over "her move to publish the names and messages" directly goes to the article where the pictures are published. It literally quotes her: "The worst part is it's my fourth ban, and all of them have been for reposting images the senders have then complained about me posting." It then goes on to link and detail what's in those images. The site that's archived in OP has already h… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/15 05:43 AM |
| 17 | This Avengers Parody Comic Perfectly Illustrates The Absurdity Of 'Men's Rights' (archive link)They wrote an entire comic filled with insane levels of strawmen against MRA's and the MRM and based it on Return of Kings criticizing the Mad Max movie? The same site that had in their about page that they are not part of men's rights? The same site that has posted repeated articles about how they are not MRA's? Feminists can't even do strawmen properly. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/15 05:14 AM |
| 8 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.I believe in free speech. She directly broke Facebooks ToS while rallying against ACTUAL free speech on sites that allow it. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 02:44 PM |
| 10 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.Hilarious isn't it. She posted a terrible picture of her nude top publicly, including onto peoples feeds who haven't followed her and onto underage timelines. Then turns around and publishes nude photos of private emails in the same posts she's claiming you shouldn't be allowed to post womens nude photos without their permission. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 02:42 PM |
| 0 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.is lying now just anyone who didn't catch or see the exact same thing as you did? Playing ignorant holds far less weight when you just replied to a post that stated This whole "oh how could I have known" bullshit also holds as much weight as your previous lying when your very previous post was in response to: "her move to publish the names and messages of dudes sending their own NSFW photos to her account." The highlighted link over "her move to publish the names and messages" directly goes to t… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 02:34 PM |
| 2 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.No naked pictures. Blatantly lying isn't really helping you here. On top of her being quote and the site itself detailing it, they directly link to the articles showing some of the pictures and then linking to her Facebook page where the pictures were. Searching further into the links shows her complaining in her interview about the photos being what Facebook banned her for. Is Facebook now lying too? Along with Clementine herself and the site trying to defend her both saying they were? If you s… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 02:25 PM |
| 4 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.The original article only implies she did without explicitly saying so. It literally quotes her: "The worst part is it's my fourth ban, and all of them have been for reposting images the senders have then complained about me posting." It then goes on to link and detail what's in those images. The site that's archived in OP has already had multiple articles on the subject and link directly to them where it shows the pictures she blatantly states she posted and shows she posted. That you're going … | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 02:12 PM |
| 20 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.That article said she posted screen caps of harassing messages, not nude pictures of anybody. "her move to publish the names and messages of dudes sending their own NSFW photos to her account." The highlighted link over "her move to publish the names and messages" directly goes to the article where the pictures are published. Don't try and lie when it's specifically in the article and links, let alone any other articles on the subject. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 12:33 PM |
| 20 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.Why is sharing someone's nudes, even if unsolicited, okay exactly? Because they're jerks? Worse is that Clementines entire argument is that it's not okay in any circumstance for it to happen to women. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 09:53 AM |
| 25 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.Aw, are u mad bra? And after losing every repeated argument, the feminist resorts to "u mad bra". shutting me down at every turn by avoiding every legitimate argument I've directly addressed every post of yours. Even the strawmen you attempted. Sorry, it seems that not giving the circlejerk answers you want doesn't mean i'm "ignoring" your "arguments". I love when people who don't know what "strawman" Strange, I haven't once said the guys actions were okay through this entire thread. Yet that ve… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 09:51 AM |
| 37 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.Let me preface with: please drop the hostility dude, Take your passive aggressive bullshit somewhere else. You've already tried repeated fallacies to defend this idiocy and have been shut down at every turn, yet here you are trying the "don't get mad bra" approach. It's holding very little weight. I am not trying to de-legitimise the cause here Already trying to justify your ridiculous complaints by bringing some claim of "the cause"? This is a thread about her actions, the only "cause" here is … | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 09:17 AM |
| 50 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.I fail to see this as "revenge porn". She took nude, deliberately sexualized images and reposted them directly to get back at those who sent them to her. She posted, by definition, revenge porn. Going "but they were jerks" doesn't stop that being revenge porn. but if what she shared were dick pics from guys who were willing to just hand them out to whomever Which makes a whole lot of irrelevance to her complaints. She is against that very thing in relation to women. These guys didn't give permis… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 08:39 AM |
| 49 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.How's she taking part in revenge porn? It's in the link of the OP. She publicly posted private nude photos sent to her in revenge. She's currently claiming that she is against "revenge porn" and that no-one should be allowed to post peoples nude photographs without their permission. While posting nude photographs, names and details of people without their permission for revenge. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 08:14 AM |
| 76 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.She's pretty much been the sole push behind the 8chan thread this started from being in the news in the first place. And from there she's gone from "i'm the victim because feminism and misogyny" to now both running on a anti-revenge porn platform AND taking part in revenge porn because she thinks it's okay because they're men. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 07:04 AM |
| 43 | Misandrist feminist Clementine Ford gets banned from Facebook for posting nude photos, names and details of men IN her rant about how nobody has a right to post nude photos of people without their permission. Claims it's an "attack on women" and "trying to silence victims". Gets unbanned.I guess some people are just more equal than others... | /r/MensRights | 21/06/15 06:33 AM |
| 6 | Sweden announces first centre for raped menIt's absolutely sickening the comments on /r/WorldNews about this praising feminism for creating this mens rape victim centre and ranting both about MRA's and how they apparently "didn't do anything for men like this". Worse still are how highly they're upvoted. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/15 08:53 AM |
| 26 | The male Pill is coming - and it's going to change everything. New forms of male contraception are estimated to hit the market in two years and - unlike women's options - most won't contain hormones.STOP with this "male pill" bullshit regarding Vasagel. It is not a pill, it is not even remotely the same as the female ease in taking a contraceptive. It is surgery on your balls. Minor surgery is still surgery. This is, at best, comparable to the current female contraceptives that are surgically inserted into their arms under the skin. Problem comes when that type of contraceptive is already unpopular due to the requirement of surgery. And that's when you don't have to cut into someones testic… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/15 01:51 PM |
| 21 | Feminists try to twist Lauren Southerns 'SlutWalk' clash with hilarious "Feminist Schools Meninist in 60 Seconds" desperate articleSouthern has never gone to a fraternity party Those same fraternity parties where a whole bunch of false rape hoaxes just happened? dealt with street harassment Like how all the "examples" of street harassment are videos like '10 Hours of Walking as a Woman in NYC' in which feminists desperately tried to cherry pick examples out of 10 hours of footage and produced less than 2 minutes of people "harassing" the woman by saying "hello", "good evening", "mam", "nice to meet you". walked into a parki… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/15 07:54 AM |
| 0 | [Showerthought] The "rule of thumb" woman abuse myth never happened but today we have men being arrested based on the measurement of how far the gap between their legs isNot a relevant comparison? One didn't exist, the other is arresting men in modern day for simply sitting. The comparison is that one would be worse but didn't exist, the other is a non-issue but is seeing men put in prison. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/15 02:02 AM |
| 1 | Kate Andrews debates the gender wage gap on Sky NewsOne has been brought up with dogma and college professors claiming factually false claims in support of feminism. The other has been brought up in a society saying men and women are equal and has found herself having to fight against feminists since, next to hardcore right wing conservatives, are the only group against equal rights. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/15 04:29 AM |
| 10 | Feminists are STILL trying to make "manspreading" a thing. Now sitting on and assaulting strangers on public transport.Where are the MRA buzzwords? Maybe we need to have weekly contests to come up with some. I know, right. We've got lame buzzwords like "logic", "equality", "facts" and "evidence". | /r/MensRights | 05/06/15 05:59 AM |
| 4 | Feminists are STILL trying to make "manspreading" a thing. Now sitting on and assaulting strangers on public transport.How many 92 year olds have you ever seen on the train? What? The elderly are one of the most likely age brackets to use public transport. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/15 05:58 AM |
| 2 | Feminists are STILL trying to make "manspreading" a thing. Now sitting on and assaulting strangers on public transport.Feminists still can't grasp that equality isn't solely based on acting like a woman. They think men should sit in the same way as women despite the physical differences in the physique. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/15 05:43 AM |
| 13 | Feminists are STILL trying to make "manspreading" a thing. Now sitting on and assaulting strangers on public transport.The men they're complaining about aren't "taking up space". Example after example they continue to use are either men sitting with empty seats next to them, men sitting in empty benches or large men who can't physically do shit about it. In some of their examples a woman is taking up full on other seats with legs or bags, yet they are ignored. This is a non-issue. And 100% not a gendered issue. Deliberately sitting on people based on deliberately sexist reasons is pure bullshit, not "getting ser… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/15 12:41 AM |
| 3 | 25 reasons why men are "totally" privileged. Number 4 had me laughing very hard at the insanity.I really thought it was going to be a joke article as that came up. But no, it kept going... | /r/MensRights | 01/06/15 12:14 AM |
| 1 | Amy Schumer explains why due process for those accused of rape shouldn't be a thing in a comedy skitPerhaps you missed the part where the issue is she's defending a court of public opinion and trying to imply public opinion is why he hasn't been charged. Rather than, you know, the absolute lack of evidence and multiple "accusers" being found to have lied or have a history of false claims/money grabbing. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/15 12:26 AM |
| 3 | Amy Schumer explains why due process for those accused of rape shouldn't be a thing in a comedy skitIt's always annoying trying to point out to people that stuff like this isn't comedic or witty, it's just trying too hard and thinking the absurd claims themselves are funny rather than some irony or double entendre actually making the absurd claim funny. It's political talking points without the wit. Jon Oliver does it well, Tina Fay does it well. But people like Schumer, Dunham and Silverman just spurt out statements and assume people think what they say is funny because the situations are bad… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/15 12:18 AM |
| 2 | Amy Schumer explains why due process for those accused of rape shouldn't be a thing in a comedy skitBecause in order for a conviction to have value, it must be found in spite of the best possible defense. "Don't you understand, those terrorists rapists are guilty of terrorism rape! We know this because they've been accused of terrorism rape and anyone who defends them supports terrorism rape and freedom women!" It's eery how easily these people share the same characteristics with extreme right wingers. Horseshoe theory in action. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/15 12:08 AM |
| 1 | Amy Schumer explains why due process for those accused of rape shouldn't be a thing in a comedy skitAt least the victims family were able to sue him for the profits from the book and win. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/15 12:04 AM |
| 1 | Amy Schumer explains why due process for those accused of rape shouldn't be a thing in a comedy skitIt actually goes to show how much public opinion means. He was (technically) found not guilty. Yet his entire life was so destroyed (pretty justifiably) after that that he had to desperately write a freakin' book admitting to the murder in order to get even a scrap of money. That's for someone who was found not guilty even though the evidence showed he did it. But we have men being accussed of rape, their accuser have literally no evidence to back it up and in many cases the accused being able t… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/15 12:03 AM |
| 8 | Good to finally see some actual balance in the mediaHoly shit. I'm sitting here thinking this was a sarcastic call-out for what would likely be in the picture. Even about to put down a 'Remind Me' for the bot. That's just levels of cliches. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/15 01:33 AM |
| 3 | A reminder about Emma Sulkowicz' (mattress girl) previous claims now that texts and evidence has come forward refuting her claimsFeel free to repost it wherever you want. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/15 10:28 PM |
| 1 | Dear Salon: Alleged rape does not equal rape. I hope you enjoy your defamation suit.Which is why Talones specifically just said "They added it without noting it". http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/36iehu/dear_salon_alleged_rape_does_not_equal_rape_i/cred0f9 | /r/MensRights | 20/05/15 01:44 AM |
| 3 | Feminists can't understand why men are needed for human reproductionbut the article describes an interesting study That's great. If the article itself wasn't anti-male. I didn't say "study doesn't understand why men are needed". nothing to do with feminism About from being written by feminist Rachel Feltman? Okay. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/15 10:30 PM |
| 3 | Feminists can't understand why men are needed for human reproductionThe title is a bit of a clickbait but the article itself has nothing to do with MRAs That's nice. But mens rights isn't solely about things to do with MRA's. It's also to do with men. And a feminist writing an entire article about why men aren't needed qualifies. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/15 10:28 PM |
| -1 | Feminists can't understand why men are needed for human reproductionfeminism isn't mentioned anywhere in the article ... [article written by Rachel Feltman] Someone better tell Rachel she's not longer to write about feminism. /u/Revet-ment said she isn't a feminist. Or I shouldn't need to explain who the well known feminist author is when the article speaks for itself. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/15 10:25 PM |
| 3 | The BBC is looking for stories from men (especially 18-35) about violent young women"Here are examples of some women being abusive to show men go through this too and domestic violence is not a gendered issue" OMG YOU'RE SAYING ALL WOMEN ARE ABUSIVE! | /r/MensRights | 19/05/15 03:42 AM |
| 7 | The BBC is looking for stories from men (especially 18-35) about violent young womenGiven the BBC's atrocious track record, I'm hesitant these victims stories will simply be twisted into some diatribe against men and somehow make those women/feminism the "real" victims. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/15 03:40 AM |
| 19 | The awkward Streisand Effect, AVFM is now between the top 20,000 most accessed sites in the world(probably due to the Mad Max "drama").It helped we were able to consistently show that The Return of Kings is anti-MRA, turning their entire complaint into how deranged feminists are they need to flat out lie in order to demonize us. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/15 05:14 AM |
| 3 | I'm totally going to see Mad Max, who's with me?Because I still fail to see how the "disposability" in these movies is exclusively male, Because the overwhelming majority of those killed are men, yet they are dismissed for the plight of an extreme minority of female characters. Taking that and now trying, again, to shift the goal posts to "more men die because there are more men" doesn't remove the point that men are treated as disposable while the female characters are treated as being worth more purely on the basis of being female. More men… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/15 02:15 AM |
| 1 | I'm totally going to see Mad Max, who's with me?That's one of the, many, absurd parts. Even Mad Max was some super powered martial arts expert. He was in multiple situations where he would get straight up killed had he fought. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/15 02:02 AM |
| 6 | I'm totally going to see Mad Max, who's with me?That's some nice revisionism. The only reason this movie being feminist even came up was because of a (Times I think) feminist BROUGHT IT UP and tried to make a big deal out of it with claims that it's some amazing triumph for feminism just before it's release. If you want to take issue with people opposing a child rape apologist pushing their ideology into a film like this, you should probably take it up with the feminists who brought it up and started praising it. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/15 02:00 AM |
| 0 | I'm totally going to see Mad Max, who's with me?So should it be women, then? Should action movies have men doing all the actual heavy lifting and everything of plot consequence, and women should just show up to be killed? That sounds really progressive. Spewing "make power fantasy", "masturbatory masculine fantasies" and now this desperate fallacy? Are there any feminist talking points you don't use to repeatedly stawman? Pointing out the hypocrisy in the dismissal of men as disposable isn't magically going to mean that people therefore suppo… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/15 01:55 AM |
| -2 | I'm totally going to see Mad Max, who's with me?It was sitting at 99% before it was even released. Reviewers like that are clearly getting kickbacks for positive reviews if they can't even rate it with some faults (such as the pretty awful CGI in many scenes). That the IMDB rating dropped dramatically once it hit cinemas is more telling. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/15 01:49 AM |
| 1 | I'm totally going to see Mad Max, who's with me?The female characters were forced. They made it a consistent issue to point out she was a woman rather than actually have her well written like characters such as Ripley or Sarah Connor. She wasn't "empowered", she was just constantly trying to be in everyones faces unnessesarily. Had we not known that a child rape supporting feminist fanatic had deliberately pushed her ideology into the film, we might have been able to pass it off as simply poor writing. But now we know it was deliberate. The f… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/15 01:44 AM |
| 2 | I'm totally going to see Mad Max, who's with me?Hey, if a woman is raped by a man it's evil. A woman rapes a 13 year old girl? That's "good rape". /s | /r/MensRights | 15/05/15 01:32 AM |
| 2 | Feminists continue to body shame men over the 'Dad bod'. This time claiming it's sexism...against women.Second page. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/15 01:23 AM |
| 0 | Feminist 'DailyDot' desperately tries to claim that Return of Kings (you know, that site that mocks MRA's and opposes the MRM) is a representative of MRA'sthe phrase comes from the founding post which was over 2 years ago. So proving my point you quote mined a snippet from years ago regarding males and dating and think because the words "mens" and "rights" are next to each other that's the same thing as the mens rights movement? You really are an idiot. And yes, I did search hard enough. Of the page in question, not a 2 year old deleted summary. Perhaps next time come up with actual evidence that TRP is part of the MRM other than thinking a quip a… | /r/MensRights | 14/05/15 02:20 PM |
| 0 | Feminist 'DailyDot' desperately tries to claim that Return of Kings (you know, that site that mocks MRA's and opposes the MRM) is a representative of MRA'sHere we have open discussion about Mens' Rights and Dating, how to live as a man in an era of feminism Strange, that phrase doesn't come up in any search or in the introduction of the sub. Nice goal post moving at the start there but the lying didn't really work well without an actual source. But please, do go on about everyone else here being "ignorant". I'm sure that'll magically make Red Pillers into MRA's despite both declaring Red Pillers as not being MRA's. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/15 01:38 PM |
| 2 | Feminist 'DailyDot' desperately tries to claim that Return of Kings (you know, that site that mocks MRA's and opposes the MRM) is a representative of MRA'sThis is the first I've heard that TRP and MRAs consider themselves in two opposite camps. It very pronounced here, more so when Elliot Rodgers happened. The MRM exists outside of this sub, whereas TRP barely exists as a concept outside of their sub, let alone the internet. That Red Pillers come in to rage when some feminist is being insane is as much of the "same camp" as MRA's who post on a /r/TodayILearned thread about sexist bullshit makes TIL'ers into MRA's. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/15 09:47 AM |
| 2 | Feminist 'DailyDot' desperately tries to claim that Return of Kings (you know, that site that mocks MRA's and opposes the MRM) is a representative of MRA'sare why I don't publicly identify with the movement So you don't identify with the movement because feminists claim people who aren't MRA's are representatives of the MRM? Because neither MRA's think TRP are MRA's nor do TRP think they are MRA's, in fact openly mocking each other. Perhaps stop taking your views from people who think a guy who visits anti-PUA sites and the Young Turks youtube channel who murdered a bunch of people is a representative of MRA's. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/15 09:28 AM |
| 1 | Feminist 'DailyDot' desperately tries to claim that Return of Kings (you know, that site that mocks MRA's and opposes the MRM) is a representative of MRA'sThe red pill is just as much a part of the men rights movements as mgtow or pua. Yeah, yeah, sure. Just, you know, they... Mock the mens rights movement Think women aren't equal to men Don't call themselves MRA's Ridicule MRA's Don't support attempts to change laws to create equality (deeming that a pointless exercise) Sure, MRA's are saying the Red Pill/PUA's aren't MRA's. Sure, Red Pill/PUA's aren't saying they're MRA's. But feminists have said they are? Well then, I guess feminists get to be … | /r/MensRights | 14/05/15 09:22 AM |
| 6 | Feminist 'DailyDot' desperately tries to claim that Return of Kings (you know, that site that mocks MRA's and opposes the MRM) is a representative of MRA'sWe really need to differentiate our selves from TRP mind set. TRP mocks and routinely attacks MRA's. We don't need to differentiate shit because a bunch of feminist idiots are blatantly lying about Mens Rights. They did the exact same thing for Elliot Rodgers when they blamed the MRM, they do the same thing for GamerGate, they flat out lie about things that there is no discernible or logical connection between. These are the same people that say women have "internalized misogyny" if they oppose … | /r/MensRights | 13/05/15 10:35 PM |
| -1 | "I can't be racist because I'm an ethnic minority woman"If racism is discriminating against someone because of their race, how is "reverse" racism not the exact same thing? So it's not a specific situation because "it's still racism"? A firefighter putting out an apartment fire is still a firefighter. Identifing the specific type of fire he's fighting doesn't magically make the building he's putting out non-existent. Reverse racism is racism. I'm not sure why people are attempting to point that out as some sort of mind blowing revelation. Reverse rac… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/15 11:42 AM |
| 0 | "I can't be racist because I'm an ethnic minority woman"But that usage implies that No it doesn't. Racism is in the term. It's specifying what type of racism it is, not denying that racism exists or only goes a certain way. just like an antifeminist isn't a Reverse racism isn't anti-racism. So that absurd comparison doesn't make any sense. It's racism that is perpetuated when attempting to stop racism. It's a specific situation. An atheist who strongly believes no deities exist is exactly the same as an atheist who lacks belief in deities by default … | /r/MensRights | 13/05/15 11:37 AM |
| 3 | Jeremy Kyle attacks audience for LAUGHING at male domestic violence victimRemember how every time anything even remotely regarding rape or domestic violence is uttered by a comedian, the most recent example being that comedian who was heckled by a feminist audience member who, and I mean literally, hid under her table after he joked that people thought he looked like a rapist and then was disparaged and tried to destroy his career by feminist activists and media outlets (for saying people think he looks like a rapist. Not "I am a rapist", no "rape is funny" but in the… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/15 05:44 AM |
| 0 | "I can't be racist because I'm an ethnic minority woman"No, she's not. Reverse racism and sexism refers to the creation of racism/sexism while attempting to remove racism/sexism. It reverses rather than equalizes or disapears. It's like complaining that different hair styles are just hair. Yes, they are. But you're differentiating between identifiable styles. Yes this is still racism. Yes this is still sexism. But it's a specific problem that occurs in a specific situation. Reverse racism/sexism refers to this exact situation that arises when people … | /r/MensRights | 13/05/15 02:04 AM |
| 8 | Bobby Flay is getting divorced. His wife says the prenup, which she signed, is not good enough. Now her lawyers are challenging the prenup. Don't EVER get married guys, apparently even a signed legal agreement won't stop you getting fucked over.The prenup should not be grossly unfair Ah there's where that "bad information" bullshit falls apart. These pre-nups are having women who came into the marriage with nothing and are leaving with millions a year in agreed alimony AND a house successfully challenging the pre-nup to receive half of the husbands money and further alimony. So no. The prenup should be freely signed several months in advance of the wedding Pre-nups are freely signed. The ones being challenged are agreed upon months in … | /r/MensRights | 12/04/15 03:54 AM |
| -1 | Wikipedia Moon Landing Page Scrubbed of "Manned" By Feminist "Gender Gap Red List"Just a heads up. SJW's during one of their against rules "edit-a-thons" are trying to claim this thread, which came AFTER their editing attempts, is responsible for the "brigading" (these SJW idiots think everything is Tumblr and Reddit) the article and returning their vandalism back to the gender neutral term of 'manned'. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/15 05:44 PM |
| 1 | "Rape Joke"Comments? You mean they disabled the comments AFTER? Aaaahahahahha, apparently they weren't getting enough people supporting their bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/15 12:44 PM |
| 1 | "Rape Joke"For not being radical enough. Not really a good mark there. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/15 12:43 PM |
| 7 | Hillary Clinton 'to announce 2016 presidential campaign' - Get ready for cries of "SEXISM!" whenever she gets criticized.Personally i'm really, really looking forward to her "women are the primary victims in war" utter misandrist bullshit making headline mainstream news media for ONCE. Republicans are likely to use that against her and it's something that cries of "misogyny" are going to completely bounce off of. For once the sheer feminist sexism in America will be shown on mainstream media and finally get people talking and looking into mens rights en mass. Education, facts and knowledge has been the biggest ene… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/15 09:19 AM |
| 3 | Hillary Clinton 'to announce 2016 presidential campaign' - Get ready for cries of "SEXISM!" whenever she gets criticized.Didn't this crap happen in Australia recently? Their PM was treated exactly the same as every other male one before her but she cried "misogyny" to everything. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/15 09:16 AM |
| 6 | Hillary Clinton 'to announce 2016 presidential campaign' - Get ready for cries of "SEXISM!" whenever she gets criticized.As a non-American looking in, Hillary Clinton is no different than a Republican from the shit she supports. Obama does some right crap but is pretty centrist (frankly very few of your American "left" are even remotely left wing). But god damn, at least the previous presidential elections had a big enough gap between the hardcore right wing Republicans and the centrist/slightly left Democrats. At this point Republicans could put forward a pretty centrist or left leaning candidate and likely win a… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/15 09:13 AM |
| 3 | Feminists try to make big list of the 'real' reasons people don't want to be feminists by detailing what they "really mean". They still COMPLETELY miss the mark.How is third wave better than second wave? Bingo. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/15 12:46 PM |
| 7 | Feminists try to make big list of the 'real' reasons people don't want to be feminists by detailing what they "really mean". They still COMPLETELY miss the mark.Blaming peoples current problems with third wave feminism by claiming "oh, you've probably only met second wave feminists", for one. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/15 10:03 AM |
| 1 | /r/Feminism had a hard time dealing with the recent case of those girls who framed that boy. I guess that's why they're brigading all the other threads on the subject.Somehow he managed to rape 13 girls? The original articles from a year ago, before it came to light that these girls had planned to frame him, had an officer flat out stating he raped 25 girls. Then later articles (still a year ago) changed that to 18 girls. That was a year ago. With no evidence. It's now "13 girls". 4 of which were caught out trying to frame him. And the rest of the charges relate to him having sex and touching underage girls while he was possibly underage himself. Which there … | /r/MensRights | 09/04/15 10:47 PM |
| 1 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".30 years of accusations! [Links to the same one accusation from 30 years ago that still has no evidence backing it] Well then... | /r/MensRights | 09/04/15 09:53 AM |
| 32 | /r/Feminism had a hard time dealing with the recent case of those girls who framed that boy. I guess that's why they're brigading all the other threads on the subject./r/femimism is the one getting brigaded Hahaha, sure it was buddy. I saw that thread back when it was active and it was nothing but feminists desperately trying to downplay and defend the girls while claiming "false rape allegations are extremely rare" in response to sane posters being disgusted with these girls. Apparently too many people were agreeing that these girls were scum and they had to delete all the things. The mods couldn't handle the fact that even their circlejerk couldn't deny the… | /r/MensRights | 09/04/15 04:57 AM |
| 2 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Might want to reevaluate how well /r/feminism is handling this. deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted | /r/MensRights | 09/04/15 12:53 AM |
| -2 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Perhaps you might want to actually get acquainted with the facts. Instead shitposting the same refuted links from a YEAR ago. You know, back before it came out that these girls were trying to frame him AT THAT TIME. The first clue should've been the "he raped 18 girls!' in your own source, another article from that time claims he raped 25 girls. Now it's less than 10. Not all of them rape charges, all of them relating to underage voluntary sexual relations with minors which began while he himsel… | /r/MensRights | 09/04/15 12:47 AM |
| -2 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".An anonymous tip that told the police about rapes only the girls involved would know about? The girls who were planning at the time to frame him? Am I really needing to explain this to you? | /r/MensRights | 09/04/15 12:22 AM |
| 1 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".They paint a scenario where nothing short of video footage of enthusiastic consent, or a rock hard alibi for the accused, can cast doubt on an accusation. Not even then. Details in the victim’s account are provably false. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/15 12:09 AM |
| -1 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".The police received a "tip off" from the very girls who were setting him up. The rest of the claims regard him having sex (most of the charges aren't even sex, it's touching) with underage girls while he was underage. The investigation regarding those is to do with whether or not he continued to have sexual encounters with them after he had gotten too old for gap year laws to apply. The rapes in question regard these girls who framed him. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 11:52 PM |
| -1 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".There are much nicer ways to say that. We're having a discussion here, not a competition. Don't tell me I need to "read the others" when I didn't imply I hadn't read others along with that link (especially when i'm talking about things not mentioned in your link) and have addressed much more than this link throughout the thread. Trying to pretend i've attacked you is a pretty poor tactic. fixed that for you No actually, you fucking didn't. The only people crying rape are the same girls who tried… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 10:48 PM |
| 0 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Fucking surprise. Posting the same link that's been repeatedly addressed this entire thread and every other. That "last comment" makes no mention of him raping her and is a vague statement that also means he didn't rape her even if we ignored the rest of the girls comments saying they were going to set him up. On top of which it's a statement from one girl who, even if it was taken as a claim of rape, the girl states when talking to the girls INVOLVED that it would apply to OTHER girls. Which is… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 10:38 PM |
| 2 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".SRS has arrived. Suddenly all the posts pointing out he's innocent until proven guilty are being downvoted. Apparently pointing out the very tenet of our legal system is something that should be buried. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 02:29 PM |
| 0 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Oh boy, you're still going. Took you that long to bring up a bunch of already addressed (most of these you've been shitposting already) links, eh? Trivalley Central. From 2014. Before it came to light these girls had framed him. ABC15. Again from a YEAR ago. Back before it came to light these girls had framed him. Hilariously extremely sensationalized and claiming "he's a dangerous rapist with 25 victims". Which has since gone down to under 10, relating to the same girls and regarding statutory … | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 02:24 PM |
| 1 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".and we can not be afraid to accept that. What afraid? They are being faced with three girls blatantly framing someone for rape and they're grumbling having to accept it since the evidence is overwhelming, so they're desperately trying to portray false rape allegations as extremely rare. It's like them having to slowly accept that their 1-in-5 rape myth is bullshit, so they began claiming "1-in-3". | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 01:48 PM |
| 0 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Perhaps you can try and keep up, since i've already repeatedly addressed more than just that link. The girls crying rape have just been proven to have been planning to frame him for rape. The police are even admitting to it. The rest are regarding underage sex, which by all accounts was entirely voluntary and consensual. The issue, which "mysteriously" only became an issue after these girls lied and tried to frame him, is that he may have been overage (beyond the Romeo and Juliet laws that allow… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 01:45 PM |
| 3 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Just decided to pop into /r/mensrights out of the blue to post once that he's a serial rapist, eh? No, sorry, he's not. The girls who claimed actual rape were found to be lying scumbags. And yes that is actually illegal in this context. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 12:42 PM |
| 2 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".That's from 2014. A year ago. The girls who accused him of that bullshit are the ones found to have lied and set him up. The only other "rape allegations" are regarding whether he had been too old when he had sex with voluntary girls ala Romeo and Juliet laws. Allegations that only came up after these lying pieces of crap framed him for rape and tried to ruin his life. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 12:39 PM |
| 4 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Near every thread currently hitting the front pages in every sub this is being posted in is being hit by SRS brigades. So when I see a, likely SRS, feminist come in here after spewing the same idiocy on /r/feminism trying to defend these girls with the exact same copy-pasted bullshit they have been refuted about in a bunch of other posts already, I can tell them they are fucking stupid. I haven't said that to any other user yet. But this user has been confirmed shitposting regarding this topic. … | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 10:25 AM |
| 14 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".He's facing 30 counts for forcing sex on unwilling partners He's being investigated regarding claims of sex with minors. I know you feminists have issues figuring out the difference between denying consent and being unable to consent but he was of the legal age for them TO consent to sex when the incidents occurred. Then he turned 18. And suddenly it was illegal. The investigation is to determine whether or not he had sex with them before he turned 18. And in case you hadn't been paying attentio… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 08:58 AM |
| 7 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Just ignore this feminist, guys. They've been posting in /r/feminism trying to defend these girl there too. Those "other girls" are completely unrelated cases that the state is having to look into because of this false allegation. And it revolves around him having consensual sex with girls who fell within the legal age bracket before he became too old. They're trying to establish if he had sex before or after he was too old for the bracket to work. Trying to compare forcible rape to teens having… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 06:53 AM |
| 4 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Where's the evidence that they tried to set him up as a rapist with false allegations? And I thought your previous post was ridiculous. Maybe...in the link? Amongst the thousands of messages they found showing they tried to set him up? Go back to /r/feminism, where you just came from and I can see from your previous posts you've been desperately trying to defend these girls and demonize this boy already. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 06:42 AM |
| 5 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".So they specifically state "except rape him" while declaring the idea of sex with him is gross and you declare that tactic agreement they think he raped a girl (despite no indication he raped them or if they had simply heard rumours) despite it's vague mentioning and the mountains of other evidence confirming they were trying to trap him with false rape allegations? Are you fucking serious? Even after I mention it IN the post you try to use against? Edit: Big surprise. Turns out you're just anot… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 06:37 AM |
| 23 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Highly doubt it. Every "positive" post there is detailing how it could hurt feminist narrative, only for them stress as hard as they can that false allegations are "extremely rare". The rest are like this scumbag... Maybe they wanted to teach him a lesson because he raped people. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 04:47 AM |
| 8 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".In fact in the private conversations they DO say he raped girls. Absolute bullshit. Where have they said this? The only quote repeatedly being used to push that narrative is where they imply the opposite and call the idea of sex with him "gross". | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 04:12 AM |
| 18 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".Bingo. We've had a few feminist/SRS apologists show up in this thread already to blame the guy and defend these girls. SRS is desperately trying to push up the same copy-pasted replies that are right down the bottom of the /r/news thread as well. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 04:09 AM |
| 15 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".I have read the story linked. There is nothing in what the girls have stated that establishes him as a rapist. While the evidence is blatant that they lied and tried to set him up as a rapist with false allegations. The rest of if is bullshit trying to tie in unrelated reports they're looking into regarding whether he had consensual sex while within the allowed age bracket. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 04:06 AM |
| 37 | A teen accused of raping 13 girls. Social media records of 3 victims shows that the three girls talked about "teaching him a lesson" by having him arrested. One of the girls even said "this is going to be so much fun <3".FUCK the piece of shits getting high upvotes in that comment section desperately trying to defend the girls. This is very misleading. Part of their conversation that is not included in the article says "We should do everything he's ever done to a girl to him. Except rape him cause he's gross.'' This implies that he did rape some of them. ... Agreed, I'm not seeing anything in those quotes that inherently indicates they were lying or conspiring to lie, as people seem to be taking them. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/15 02:22 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistAnd you say that they would be wrong if they did It's pretty sad you really have nothing left but strawmen. No, I never said anything of the sort. I pointed out, in response to your claim that "murder victims can't organize and do anything" that the victims of murder (who include people other than just the immediate dead) have indeed organized and lobbied. Entire laws have been formed from such pushes. So try again. Not by Germans and non Jews. Oh yes, German comedians apparently are "the worlds… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 11:59 AM |
| 2 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistYou are providing the evidence. Ooooh, wow. You really think trying to shift burden of proof is going to work for you after ALL of the shit that you've been shut down about? No, sorry, I didn't make the claim. You did. So provide evidence. You are saying male to female rape jokes are normal in male comedy. Naaww, that lie is still not going to work. I've said the opposite of that repeatedly. You claimed they are normal in male comedy. So, again, provide evidence for your claim. BLAH BLAH BLAH FE… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 11:56 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistIts your clam that male to female rape jokes are normalized in male comedy. Hmm, that fallacy REALLY isn't going to work. Especially when i've spent this entire thread flat out repeatedly stating that rape jokes aren't "normalized". But points for being that desperate you would flat out lie and think it'll work as an argument, hahaha. You don't know what the term means Oh boy, you're still trying with this bull. So, when are you providing the evidence for your claims? All this deflecting of your… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 11:52 AM |
| 2 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistMy claims aren't false. Oh gooood, then you're finally going to stop fallaciously deflecting and provide evidence backing your claims? Right? [continues to spew the same deflection without backing your claim] Oh. So that's a no then? No, you're still refusing to provide evidence for your false claims? Okay. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 11:50 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistMurder victims are not going to organize and object to jokes about them or their assailants. Oh yes, clearly attempted murder victims and families of murder victims have totally never organized and lobbied against something. Ahahahahahahahah. holocaust jokes Which are told without issue in comedy clubs world wide. Have been for some time. Mysteriously they don't "normalize" or "encourage" further holocausts either. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 11:49 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistNo, sorry, an unrelated spiel about victim blaming drivers had absolutely no relation to my pointing out your attempt to imply murder victims don't count because they're dead (as if, as I pointed out, people don't survive attempted murder and the "only" victims are just the murdered) and it definitely had no relation to the rest of the original post that made no mention of anything you're ranting about. So no, it had no relation either way to my argument. And these desperate deflections of yours… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 11:17 AM |
| 2 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistNo its not evidence of my claims Oh, i'm well aware of that. You have no evidence for your claims because they are false. So I continue to point it out as your entire argument rests on claims you have no evidence for. Women joking about women raping men is not standard fare on female comedy - so there is not evidence because its not normal. Ah, still trying this deflection? So, again, provide evidence where male comedians consider rape jokes normal then. Still waiting. No its not a deflection, t… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 11:14 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistNormalization doesn't mean we don't try to stop it. Aw, sorry, that's not going to work either. I pointed out it's not normalized to your claim it is. I never said normalization means it you don't try to stop it. If you live in an area with a high murder rate, you eventually get used to it. And as we can see in the Western world, no we don't. We constantly try to change that and don't settle getting "used to it". blah blah blah male on female rape jokes!!! Oh dear, you're still trying that falla… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 11:09 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistI related directly to what you are saying. No. Not you didn't. You couldn't understand why putting responsibility for drunk drivers on drunk drivers is no considered victim blaming. And immediately after that you back me up by showing you're not saying anything even remotely related to what I posted. You ranted that murder victims don't object in defense of your complaints about "triggered" women. I pointed out 'That's as ridiculous as claiming "but they weren't driving the car, what are they up… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 11:05 AM |
| 2 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistIm saying we object to comedy involving male victims of women, feminists object to comedy involving rape. That's nice. It's still not evidence for your claims. And certainly not of the claim that anyone is objecting to non-harmful and non-mocking rape jokes in either genre. This is a retarded question. Asking for evidence, which you're still deliberately deflecting and refusing to provide, on which you've based your entire current argument is a "retarded question"? Nice fallacy. Now provide the … | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 11:00 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistAnd while that's a nice nonsensical, unrelated post to anything i've stated, it also still doesn't back up anything you've said or have claimed. So try again? | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 10:57 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistMurder and theft are seen as a normal part of life you idiot. They are things that happen. They are considered vile, against society and constant financial and police attempts to curb them. So no. You think male to female rape jokes are normal because they are. Male to female rape jokes are almost non-existent. So, again, provide evidence where they are normally occurring in these comedy shows? But, again, I doubt you'll actually provide evidence since you think this guys sketch was a rape joke … | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 10:56 AM |
| 2 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistNo, there is a time stamp in the edit you fucking idiot. You've really run out of arguments now that you're trying this bullshit. The edits clearly say I posted before you made them. So you probably shouldn't rely on that hilarious deflection. Can you stick to the facts instead of trying to run a smear campaign like an sjw? Oh dear, seems i've been refuting your ridiculous claims with facts already. But apparently the WHO "is wrong". Heh, sorry but no. You are making the false equivalence betwee… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 10:53 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistWhy don't murder victims object? You realize people survive murder attempts, right? And that there are victims of murder other than the immediate murder victim as well? That's as ridiculous as claiming "but they weren't driving the car, what are they upset about" if a passenger was in a car crash. So? So you just avoided both direct comparisons, both of which refute your claims about "normalization", and the best argument you can come up with is "so?"... Why do they not have the potential to off… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 10:45 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistI edited that because I left out a word, I said it doesn't effect 25% of the population. Wow. Now doubly back tracking? With an attempt that doesn't even make any sense since you brought up the 25% claim. And sorry, despite your claim it "doesn't effect 25% of the population", it seems i'll take the World Health Organization over your already refuted arguments. Im not talking about circ. And further doubling back from you. Which doesn't mean much since I already pointed out earlier that women ca… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 10:35 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistYou don't know what normlaized means. Murder and theft jokes are quite routine in comedy. So yet, I do. Trying to ignore that your entire bullshit argument falls apart because the prevailence of those jokes haven't increased "murder culture" or "theft culture" isn't magically making me not. Male on female rape jokes are normal in male comedy. And for the THIRD time, provide proof of your claim. Because right now this comedian isn't making a rape joke and you're declaring it part of "normalizing … | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 10:28 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistI meant the tying up of an adult who then has his genitals completely destroyed by domestic violence by a woman. You meant something else? Odd, since you then went on to say that "only" happens to 25% of the population. But nice deflection. Pity it's not going to work as it becomes clearer and clearer your complete lack of argument. There is no such thing as 25% of the population that have experienced that Oh yes, apparently you're right and the World Health Organization is completely wrong. Loo… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 10:21 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistDid you forget to change into your alternative account to faux rant or did you honestly think spam replying to the same post was going to work? You are experiencing normalization. You really have nothing other than fallacies to argue with, don't you. Nobody is normalizing "rape jokes". Murder hasn't been "normalized", nor has theft, despite incredible use of them in jokes. Worse still, with your absurd claims, is that the comedian mentioned that people think he looks like a rapist. This goes wel… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 10:17 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistIm not a feminist. Oh no, no. You just think male genital mutilation is nonexistent, there's nothing wrong with saying "boys are stupid throw rocks at them" and that using even the word "rapist" should be banned because it might "trigger" "actual" women whos issues "actually" exist. Nothing feminist about that at aaaaall. Maybe 25% of the population It's amazing that you can sit here and claim that 25% of the male population (the WHO has stated it's roughly 33%+ of the global male population) is… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 10:09 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistEven though, unlike rape there is no significant % of us that were affected by either of these things Feminist ignorance, everybody. We make a big deal out of mutilation because it does indeed effect a massive portion of the male population. Far, far, faaar more than female genital mutilation by any remote degree. And yet FGM is illegal, while MGM is not. And as I pointed out, jokes about the subject are fine. Mocking victims is not. Which is why had this comedian done anything even remotely to … | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 09:55 AM |
| 1 | Feminists flip out about "encouraging rape culture" when comedian implies he himself looks like a rapistWe flip out when media hosts are joking about men being sexually mutilated. That strawman isn't going to fly when here... Didn't make a rape joke (he implied he looked like a rapist. There was no joke about rape or any remote encouragement of rape). It's not even remotely the same thing to compare a joke to laughing at and supporting genital mutilation. Jokes that simply have genital mutilation in their punchline without support for it are also fine. Her response was absolutely moronic and well … | /r/MensRights | 29/03/15 02:42 AM |
| 1 | Mother publicly shamed young boy who tried to ask out her daughterOh yes, no-one is going to be able to figure out who she's referring to at her daughters school. -_- | /r/MensRights | 19/03/15 11:10 AM |
| 1 | It's actually pretty disturbing that a feminist can claim this despite literally the exact opposite happening.So blaming black people as a race for crime committed by some black people isn't racist because "it's a strange way to interpret the stories women tell about violence from black people"? | /r/MensRights | 16/03/15 01:40 AM |
| 7 | It's actually pretty disturbing that a feminist can claim this despite literally the exact opposite happening.the tag was interpreted as insensitive, regardless of intention, Oh yes, how insensitive of men to defend themselves and their gender from ignorant misandrist sexism against their entire gender. Damn those insensitive men. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/15 11:23 PM |
| 13 | It's actually pretty disturbing that a feminist can claim this despite literally the exact opposite happening.Apart from where he killed more men. Sure, apart from that it was totally about women. Yeah, he stated quite clearly he wanted to kill everybody...but he only hated women. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/15 01:21 PM |
| 18 | It's actually pretty disturbing that a feminist can claim this despite literally the exact opposite happening.Is that what was happening? Yes. Repeatedly. And when you start spewing idiocy like #YesAllWomen experience violence from men and start screaming at any and all men, you know, not being sexist assholes by defending HALF the population by mocking "lolol notallmen!" then claiming "oh we aren't being literal" doesn't hold much weight. YesAllWomen is factually untrue. NotAllMen is factually true. The worst part was where they kept being presented with the same bullshit sexism by switching it to "#Ye… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/15 01:08 PM |
| 28 | It's actually pretty disturbing that a feminist can claim this despite literally the exact opposite happening.It's why people originally began stating "not all men". It was in direct response to women blaming all men for Elliot Rodgers shooting with the factually untrue claim that "all women" suffer violence at the hands of men. They literally mocked the idea that men as a gender aren't responsible for violence against women. That's how fucked up they are. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/15 11:41 AM |
| 1 | Was about to make a purchase tonight until I saw the bracelet of the lady behind the counter. Cancelled my purchase and spoke to the owner over the phone, who was unaware of it and not onsite. She was reasonable, and it appears some more professional attire will be in order at their company.I'm sure you would be saying the exactly same thing if someone wore a shirt or bracelet that said "I hate black people"? | /r/MensRights | 09/03/15 03:33 AM |
| -1 | "Feminist writers are so besieged by online abuse that some have begun to retire" apparently Mens Rights and GamerGate are responsible for the biggest misandrist, sexist, women infantizing feminists in the industry losing their supporters.Then link to the thread here if those posts actually exist. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/15 08:20 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter