TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

No-Avocado-533 Archive

View 2 posts and 117 comments by No-Avocado-533 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

GeneralNo-Avocado-533/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:08 PM
6

GeneralNo-Avocado-533/r/MensRights04/05/24 10:56 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
72

He's a moyel so no Jesus involved.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:39 PM
1

I think that no matter which route you take with those organizations like the EU (especially the EU) the question isn't will you bleed, it's when.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 07:14 PM
1

I think you missed the point. The point was that we've never really seen a country pull out of one of these multinational things like this before, especially a nation like the UK .
/r/MensRights24/05/24 07:03 PM
1

There's a certain degree of moderation that has to exist prior to things kicking off violently. You cannot make the first move in this situation, you have to allow the Mohammeds to make the first move.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 06:02 PM
1

The whole thing will start because of the migrant mess in Europe. You cannot just drop what would be 20-30% of your population in over the last ten years and not expect disaster to follow.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 05:27 PM
3

Really no way to tell with some of this stuff. I do think that the end of the attempts at things like the UN and the EU are certainly on the horizon, as a lot of this mess we have presently is the result of those organizations pushing their ideals through out the developed world. The UN and the sort of American world order always cracks me up- it's always the mantra of democracy, human rights and misguided cultural relativism. It's all a really reductive vision of the world. There is a loss of f…
/r/MensRights24/05/24 04:11 AM
7

I think that the positive is were going to start seeing a dismantling of the international liberal order as we have known it to be since the end of WW2. It will start in Europe because of the immigration mess. I think that with that sort of post WW2 American liberal order collapsing abroad, there will finally start to be some cultural healing.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 01:24 AM
1

It's the sign we are heading towards the crisis when we start talking about this topic as we do. Advanced society cannot function with out men, and at some point men will begin to reassert ourselves. Now how that happens is another matter.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:21 AM
0

Only if you're a protestant ;)
/r/MensRights21/05/24 12:30 AM
2

Depends on where. I do think that there's a balance that has to be struck between being complementary with women and women still having dignity and independence in society.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 12:42 PM
0

It depends on which church. With out going faaaaaaar down this rabbit hole: they are not all equal.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 12:40 PM
0

I got one, I'm a first generation. I'll tell you why, not every immigrant is the same or has the same intentions.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 12:39 PM
3

I don't hate women at all. I'm not particularly happy how things are playing out between men and women, but some of my favorite people in the world are women.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 02:54 AM
15

We all annoy everyone from time to time. It's a question of how annoying and in what regard.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 02:52 AM
1

It's hard to solve when we're in the present state we're in.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 01:24 AM
8

This is going to sound like the most cave man shit ever but here it goes: We did. We built society cooperatively to take care of our women and child and protect them and provide for them.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 01:24 AM
4

The biggest one? Male only spaces. That one is fairly obvious. Further, institutions that carried weight in our society had a role in regulating the issues that came about, like the church.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 01:23 AM
13

So there's this thing called "social media" Big culprit in this.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:24 PM
42

As men we are expected to solve problems. The whole issue with the way things are these days is that we cannot be expected to do that but then be placed at a disadvantage.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 08:38 PM
35

That's natural. Men built society because of women. We quite literally do all of this for their benefit which in turn is our benefit. The issue is that we had mechanisms in place to resolve our problems until feminism came along. So with out those mechanisms, we're kinda screwed.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:30 PM
20

The issue with the way things are these days is we let women try to tell men on the whole to act, which is a horrible idea. This is the reason why in the past there were so many men's only spaces. It wasn't exclusionary to women out of some form of sexism, because women's only spaces existed back then too. It was exclusionary because inclusion would undermine its purpose, which was to be an outlet for men. I'd actually even go so far as to say that part of the reason men in the past wouldn't sha…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 06:24 PM
3

Rudyard is right generally speaking. I do think he's correct in saying that the incel situation is very much the sort of "emperors new clothes" of our times.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 06:03 PM
50

I'll always make a concession to women on one thing: As men, we should be held to a standard by ourselves and other men. I think it's a net positive. HOWEVER: Let's not pretend that the dynamic between men and women has basically put men on such a backfoot they can push us over with ease any time they want and evade responsibility for their actions.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 05:59 PM
4

At its core, feminists believe that women are not complementary to men but just disadvantaged men, it makes more sense.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 03:33 PM
0

Tell all of the native Europeans that those immigrants that were dumped into their countries (I have an EU passport too so I have skin in this game) that their children that were r*ped, assaulted or what ever else are just the price that they have to pay for "diversity" or that the immigrants don't understand your society or that prosecuting them would be racist.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 03:05 PM
3

It's the steps between meeting and the penis that are the issue. I have two of the three sixes in the bag and well... I also have model steam locomotives.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 03:00 AM
5

The issue, flatly is this: Some women feel too liberated from men so they feel like they can offer less and get away with it. I say some because I think that social media brings out the delusional side of shit, but I think in the most practical sense, most women like to dream about that but know damn well that's now how things work. The sense of entitlement is INSANE these day, there is no argument there. I think this shit might also have started from feminist HQ. Set the expectations really hig…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:13 AM
60

Basically yes. I would argue that the thing is in a death spiral. Even getting to talk to a woman these days on them is uncommon, so naturally it makes a lot of guys nervous. Which makes us less confident and more apt to screwing shit up. Women have grown more fickle over time as well, so its a perfect storm that breeds a cycle that leaves both single. I am positive a lot of men have screwed up dates with women that would have married them because of how beaten down they have gotten.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:04 AM
2

Thanks dude. I'm glad I could be a help. I think that the left/feminists are aware (at least on some level) that there is a danger to all these men- and they really don't have a good way to address this situation with out burning their constituents. More so than that, a growing number of these young men are turning to their political opposition and with the right person coming along, could be lead to being very destructive. I think that the only way that they have tried to address the situation …
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:04 AM
1

If something is going to happen men's rights will be a component, not the driver. The driver likely will be economics.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:35 AM
1

Alright, you want to play that game. It's the price that is paid in the US for liberty. If you want perfect safety, you will not have liberty. Is it unfortunate? Yes. At the same time people in the US aren't being arrested for videos of pugs doing the roman salute.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:29 AM
-2

Really a sick thing to bring up.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 02:11 PM
0

It shouldn't exist. The Walloons and the Flemish don't get along. It won't exist soon.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 02:10 PM
5

Its one of those equality when it suits us complementarianism when it doesnt sort of things. Its their favorite inside outside game
/r/MensRights18/05/24 08:58 AM
-4

Belgium is a mistake.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 08:28 AM
2

The stupidest thing about this: Women literally can motivate us to stupider shit than we are capable of motivating ourselves to USING their vaginas but instead they wanted to compete with us. Do you think I want to work a fucking desk job? No. I do it because if I do end up married I'll be able to provide for a wife really well. If it wasn't for that, my ass would be off doing something far dumber but more rewarding.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 07:47 AM
7

There is a pendulum. Things aren't going to happen because of a bunch of upset incels. I would argue that things will start moving forward because of the men that would have been by all rights married 40 years ago but due to modern conditions are not. What stops things aren't a bunch of white knights, simps or cucks. It's more along the lines of the pressure hasn't built up enough and the right conditions haven't been met. The question isn't if something will happen but when and where. Looking a…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 07:28 AM
2

I'm a bit drunk, you've been warned.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 07:18 AM
1

As far as a correction goes... The population crash that is happening through out the developed world is going to be a component of the crisis that is coming up. I'm fairly certain of it. The proliferation of these ideas could be traced back to globalism and its insistence on spreading the western left's ideals through out the world. I'm a little too drunk to beat this horse, but suffice to say, its more than just feminism that is going to face a reckoning soon. If as a civilization, we are pres…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 07:18 AM
6

I'm going to apologise in advance, this is going to be long. The TLDR: You're right, it will swing back. We're in for a nasty correction in the developed world soon. The long form answer to this whole thing, this is some shit that would go on a sub stack or something I have been drinking so be warned. I'm perfectly sober. Feminism is a luxury belief that can only exist as long as it is able to ensure that society is able to still succeed while allowing it to exist. Feminism only exists because m…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 07:18 AM
3

We're a sort of weird in between of the two. Further, the monogamy thing is one of the more... advanced features we have.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 04:37 AM
16

Quite literally, and I am totally, 100% serious about this in the secular sense: Everything we do as guys is for sex. We built all of society quite literally for what boils down to... sex. Our natural state as men is basically going back to chimp. Women do not want us as chimp, so we become man so we can have the sex and have children and sometimes act like chimp with them. You know what happens when the sex doesn't become worth it? We go back to chimp and burn this shit down. The reason that in…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 04:33 AM
10

There's an issue with men, below a certain threshold if we are doing bad we go from man to monke and proceed to go apeshit and burn things down.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 04:21 AM
4

Patriarchy is natural. Its not great for either sex, but its one of those "a place for everyone, everyone has their place" sort of things.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:59 AM
-5

The patriarchy exists, its just hibernating. But the specter of it existing must continue for the sake of feminism to have validity. That's part of the reason why it exploded out into other stuff, including the men that believe that they too are oppressed by the patriarchy. We put it to sleep when times are really good in the belief that it would make society a better place and the like, and over time as it gets deeper into its sleep things get worse. It always ends up coming back really, really…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:58 AM
18

A traditional Catholic being a traditional Catholic during a time that it seems like people are becoming Catholic more and more. The shock, the HORROR. I know.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:11 AM
9

I think its more or less done to make us associate anything we don't like that happens to our bodies with the patriarchy- when its sex specific.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:03 AM
13

The sooner people realize that feminists do not view women as women in the sense of being a distinct sex from men that complement men (as men complement women) and view them more as disadvantaged men with different bodies, the sooner it will make sense to you. Patriarchy to them is basically anything that women have to go through that men do not that is unpleasant.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:46 PM
7

We've created dysfunction. I don't know how else to put this, but the situation with dating/mating has devolved into full fledged dysfunction, and generation Z is the ones that are seeing the worst of it at present. If this doesn't right itself soon, it's going to cause a problem. This isn't an if, but when.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 09:06 PM
1

The rich ones don't drink the kool-aid. Not really. The poor ones do. Guess who has better outcomes.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 02:53 AM
11

A soviet citizen would look at western marxists like they were from the moon. ...because the people like them were killed off during the revolution mostly.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 12:24 AM
2

Basically the way that the risk was mitigated was maximum amounts of marriage.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:35 AM
10

This situation is going to cause serious turmoil. Men not having sex is a danger to society.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:33 AM
4

Short answer: Because as straight men, women are the highest validation for us. When obtaining that becomes difficult for straight men on a broader level, things can potentially get really, really, really goofy. To elaborate: Our society tries to play this inside outside game between equality and complementarianism in a manner that gives women the advantage. Anyhow, men that are not able to marry are seen as a risk. Marriage is what is seen as buying into society, because you have a vested inter…
/r/MensRights16/05/24 02:47 AM
1

Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Mao. We had pieces of shit on our side too.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 01:29 AM
20

The whole of the developed world right now is in a pressure cooker. And someone just threw lentils in. Mark my words, this birth slump is EXACTLY the kind of existential issue (besides immigration, the globalization and what not) that is going to breed authoritarians. We thought the world was bad when it was just the four from WW2- this whole thing could get waaaay worse as time goes on.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 01:37 AM
1

We kill ourselves because we've become useless.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:54 AM
7

The future isn't female. If anything, the longer this mess is protracted the worse its going to get .
/r/MensRights12/05/24 06:36 PM
2

There's nothing wrong with the arrangement that is patriarchy. It's the norm through out much of history.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 05:28 PM
1

If history is any indication: We end up having to oppress women again to get society back on its feet.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 03:00 AM
0

It really does exist. We consent to this shit by not doing anything.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 03:25 AM
0

You know its like at one point, we ordered society around our natural tendencies, rather than idealism. What a novel concept, there's science to back male nature being different.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 03:22 AM
1

This might be hard for people to believe, but only when decadence gets to the point it does do people start dreaming up the shit that they come up with now.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 03:20 AM
1

That's the eternal goal, but for some reason we make the same mistakes over again and we act like "well it will be different now, people have changed". We don't, not like that.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 03:17 AM
3

With out going too far into this matter, otherwise I'd just DM you: I think in the UK it will only change when there is truly a right wing party over there, and the bar for what it would take to please the bulk of the people on these matters is so low. The Tories disgust me. They're just a slow moving Labour party anymore. The upper class people I know don't seem particularly optimistic that the working classes would do anything, and the working classes I've met seem to think that the upper clas…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 03:14 AM
1

That's sort of a trend in history, but I think that particularly bad cycles like this one don't typically happen too often.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:50 AM
6

They'll cheer about it until they don't. Usually they move when they realize they screwed up.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:41 AM
1

My biggest concern (because I really don't want to see anything bad happening to anyone) is that the longer what ever event it will be that causes the change is delayed, the worse off everyone is going to be.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:41 AM
1

No, but here's the catch: People do need to understand the distinction between social and economic in these matters. The social left is lunacy. The economic center is about where I sit.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:40 AM
9

It's more of a virtue signal. My family lived through a racial conflict, these people change their tune really fast when they realize that supporting someone who want's to kill you doesn't make you look like a friend to them, but rather the fool that sold out his/her own.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:35 AM
11

They only do this because they feel secure doing it. You know its bad when non-whites are starting to get after them about it.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:34 AM
1

There needs to be a good, solid study on autism and where it comes from. I'm not entirely convinced as the Victorian age was an environmental catastrophe and people seemed to be just fine then too.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:22 AM
2

Forward doesn't exist. We switched from a more community based mindset to a more individualistic one. There's never really a forward or backwards, its trying the same crap that was tried over again and often times reaching the same disasters.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:07 AM
1

The immigration situation there is partially to blame for all this. The high trust society that was Britain is really now relegated to the shires.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:05 AM
1

If what happened met the legal definition of insurrection, Trump wouldn't have a shot at 2024.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:04 AM
2

Did you ever consider why the USSR was economically left wing but socially conservative? You'll find that the social dysfunction that causes this is the product of left wing philosophy- socially speaking.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:42 AM
3

If they are using misandry as a response to misogyny, its evidence that they're aware enough that their rhetoric is failing. Which is why I think the misandry is increasing.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:37 AM
3

Imagine if you will that the only way you could advance the cause of women was to hamstring men. Then imagine if you will that the results were not what you had imagined, that the sexes are not interchangeable. Now imagine that you doubled down on it to prove everyone wrong and you were still wrong. Then triple down despite the damage to your society. I think at some level, the more objective heads in the room can see that feminism has had a bad result and this push back from men is sort of like…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:34 AM
1

In a way yes. There is a tendency to try to bring all women onto the same level.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:54 PM
1

They won't have kids either in a generation or two unless the underlying issue is solved. Frankly, the Netherlands belongs to the Dutch. You don't need diversity, you just need your own people.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:52 AM
10

...dude if you're here this issue is getting worse than expected. Even stranger still is hearing about lesbians saying that they understand what men are going through now. Speculatively... gay men are more or less a novelty to them. You're one of the girls until you aren't.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:44 AM
1

Unfortunately the immigrants aren't really a good answer to this either I'm sorry to say.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:35 AM
1

We've passed the point where the solution is going to be something that could be solved with an ad campaign and have gotten to the point where it could take some good ol'fashioned government interventionism.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:34 AM
4

They'll blame men but get REALLY QUIET when race factors in.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:26 AM
2

The whole thing boils down to trust.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:12 AM
5

They're running into a wall though. When things got to the trans kids mess that's when people starting getting a bit schwifty.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:11 AM
1

Yeeeeahh... that's a scary thought
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:08 AM
4

we're not meant to be equal in the sense we are now. We're meant to be complementary.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:08 AM
9

Perhaps? Its safe to assume that they have a process already set up to make more feminists that works quite well for now. I think they know what they are doing and what they think the outcome will be and how they think men will react, but I don't think they are self aware enough to be able to see how wrong they are.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:07 AM
1

I think for the sake of the boys, I would try to go to counselling or what ever is available in the area. I think it would be a bit different if they were teenagers already, but with such young boys it would be down right awful.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:04 AM
1

There is a degree of insecurity that men do have naturally. It's what pushes us along partially. The 50/50 thing doesn't seem like it started because of money but rather as a response to bad female behavior that a lot of men have taken notice of.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 02:39 AM
7

They have to make these claims or it would justify their action. /
/r/MensRights07/05/24 02:37 AM
1

It will. The question is when and how.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 02:36 AM
1

I became Catholic. No regrets, 10/10 worth it.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 02:23 AM
7

This is a good one. Like any utopian idea (communism), they will claim that we're not happy because we aren't being feminist enough or what have you, I doubt that they lack the self awareness to see how this whole thing will actually go wrong for them. This won't per-se start a war, but something will happen as a result of all this. It won't happen strictly to feminism either, general leftist craziness is what's causing this whole thing. If I were to place bets on this whole thing it will fizzle…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 02:20 AM
3

The classic case of "progress for me but not for thee". The sexes have to be complimentary to one another, trying to make them equal too much will only turn this whole thing adversarial.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:59 AM
146

It's really not surprising though. You cannot disenfranchise people from contributing to society and then expect them to do contribute to society. One of the many signs the situation is further progressed than we think... Stuff like this, MGTOW, the male female political divide- I wish I could say that the pace wasn't picking up on all this stuff.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:57 AM
7

That plus look at the way she keeps her home.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:50 PM
21

Brother if you get a lawyer that's willing to bite on this I will fly my ass to the UK just to watch the trial.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:47 PM
6

Brother you need to start the lawsuit. This is one of those things that absolutely, 100% requires someone to set the precedent on- suing over misandry. If they want equality, they are going to get equality. The good the bad and the ugly. This shit will only go on as long as men consent to it.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:46 PM
7

Dude that is the most fascinating thing I have read all day.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:42 PM
6

The shock, the horror. You mean to tell me also that men aren't interested in approaching them anymore because they are tired of being humiliated?
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:36 PM
8

Quite literally the point of feminism is to teach women to self sabotage, comfort them with feminism, blame men, and then the cycle repeats itself. It's really effective. With incels, I think a better way to look at it is this: Would they have been in this same place 40 years ago? The issue isn't that there are incels. It's how many people that aren't married today that would have been 40 years ago. EDIT: My personal favorite coming from the femcel/feminist/women dating stuff is the idea of "mas…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 03:53 PM
7

This is what happens when we try to refocus our society/culture around the individual rather than the family. It's strange how that seems to work.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 03:49 PM
1

Basically. I've got the flu brain so forgive me if this doesn't make sense. There's a thing about this that goes on a lot, they attempt to "liberate" women from men more, but at the same time I don't think that they realized its not so much liberating women from men rather it's dissolving social bonds between men and women. The issue that feminists run into is that there are bonds at times that they don't want to lose out on because they are still beneficial to feminism. They really have a hard …
/r/MensRights06/05/24 03:42 PM
1

I thought more about this. This video brought up some good points about what men are going through these days. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDdYBQKHN_U
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:22 PM
1

Ehh you never know. It doesn't take the majority of men to get something rolling, it takes only a very active and aggressive minority and for enough of the majority to be at least tolerant of their views.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:12 PM
15

There's a contradiction in kind about things these days: The support that we are so accustomed to giving women WAS because their role in a healthy natalist society needed it. They would absolutely need support from the men in their lives because of what was being expected of them and because in a lot of ways, they were still dependent upon men. Men were expected to learn to do for themselves and to be independent in a way that women weren't. They were given opportunity that they had to reach for…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:12 PM
12

Because when you can have anything you go after what you can't have.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 04:40 AM
4

Flatly? The summation of all this shit anymore is women want to hold men to standards and will shame us for not adhering to those standards but demand that they are absolved of any standards. It doesn't work.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 04:26 AM
1

That's totally on him then. I do think to be fair what happened to him in some ways isn't atypical, it seems like a lot of guys I know in their 30s it all just sort of dropped off for them with any hope of dating, all around about 8-10 years ago.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 04:21 AM
2

I feel for him, a lot of men that should be more confident have been stripped of their confidence.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:22 AM
3

It only became worse when we deregulated the dating market. There will always be the men that women do not want out right, that's normal. The issue isn't that. The issue is that the average man has become so devalued in our current situation. It's really dangerous in the long haul.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 04:42 AM
1

The sexes were meant to be complementary, when you try to make them equal you'll never end up with equality. Women's rights, feminism, etc., all predicate on men consenting to it, and they're doing a wonderful job at this time at giving men a case to take those rights from them again. The worse this situation gets for men the worse the correction will be for them I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 02:57 AM
1

The market is a no-win situation for most men anymore.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 02:42 AM
4

Yeah but that doesn't apply to more modern, developed cultures.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 02:42 AM
5

TLDR with out the added fluff: I feel awful for them, I think that they have been failed horribly but they represent the tip of the spear of a very serious problem, we need to solve this problem soon but the issue is how severe it's gotten. I've been trying to figure out what is going on with this whole dynamic between men and women for some time now. So far the best conclusion I've come to is this: Some men have it harder trying to find relationships, the issues start arising from how common it…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 02:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter