TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

No-Recognition-4033 Archive

View 5 posts and 700 comments by No-Recognition-4033 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

This is not a men's issue. Nor is it propaganda, she's hawt, and that is it. This is capitalism at work, and it is good and great.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 06:03 AM
8

Among all that it is imperative that we are social, even if you don't deem dating a serious enough issue. There is a male loneliness epidemic for a reason, and it's not just romantic loneliness, but it doesn't exclude romantic loneliness either. And, no, status alone will not bring the girls to the yard. At least not the ones you'd want.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 05:44 AM
2

Tbf, the rules do say that posts can include most issues related to men. The problem with the pill people and mgtows is that they don't have other subs to go to for an echo chamber, trp is quarantined and mgtow was banned, and that's what they want, excuses to stay celebate, among their other extremist beliefs. Despite the fact that they could simply choose celibacy. Imo dating is a real issue of men, but the pill people make it real difficult to share sound advice.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 04:39 AM
0

Chat gpt regularly says that I'm a woman, and is known to be inaccurate and is an unreliable source. There are hundreds of places to get the reading material, openbible holding most versions, including the 1588 Geneva. That being said, what chat gpt told you is in line with my statement.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 03:45 AM
1

Dude, I don't even know how to keep track of my comments on YouTube.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 03:04 AM
-1

Corinthians is nothing but that.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 02:39 AM
0

"Prominent," is a strong word.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 01:55 AM
2

Nietzschean-Jeffersonian bullshit, sacrifice is not disposability, and altruism, while naive, is imperative even for anarchists. Only thugs believe otherwise.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 01:35 AM
-1

In fact, the fact that one believes other people believe can make one even more vulnerable. Which is extra weird, since there are entire books of the Bible based on not trusting people who simply declare their faith.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:58 AM
1

Always go dutch.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:50 AM
0

Just something you may be interested in, freedom and all.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:47 PM
0

Have you ever heard of adamitism?
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:03 PM
-1

those are two different points. also, i mentioned that the media has a big part to play because i read a few things here and there, where mix everything male related together, including incels, when not all the male groups really include them in their povs or advices That's not disconnected at all, an incel wouldn't be an incel if they weren't lonely, unless they're an actual incel due to disability or something. ot really. a big example that solidifies my point is the passport bros movement. in…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:52 PM
0

That is a voluntary leadership role that certainly wouldn't damage your career. Maybe reach out to peers and underlings to see if they'd be willing volunteers so you can delegate. Or seek the other leaders for advice.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:46 PM
0

They did highjack it, it was a sign of the loneliness epidemic. Any group mentioning men's issues has historically been brigaded by people who are not, in fact, incels. But who want to be alone to share shitty dating advice and excuses to avoid dating. This is not an online phenomenon. Even in the Red Pill documentary Cassie Jaye touched on it and gave examples of how it happened in person.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:39 PM
3

Biblical wisdom is too often thrown away by those rejecting it based on experiences and their views on the distastefulness of history. There's much that could help the loneliness issue especially.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:23 PM
1

Only to Marxist communists, who're incapable of abstraction and think God means 'we imagine things and it happens'. I mean that humans, and by extension all self-conscious intelligences to be, ascribe godhood to things they don't know, thus, by taking responsibility to understand all reality systematically, they become the gods that once needed to be imagined as explanations. It's a very dialectical and ontological perspective, I recommend Errol Harris' 'An Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel'.…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:07 PM
2

I agree to the extent that proper reason is a solution to men's issues. But I reject that masculinity is dialectic to its core, that is true for stoicism, but not masculinity. I also question the nature of your extra-humanist talk of God hood, that's hardly dialectical.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 09:46 PM
-2

Incels highjacked the red pill movement shortly after it began, they are a liability.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:39 PM
13

Aging population, most people in the west are old, the newer generations barely have enough kids to keep up the population.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:26 PM
2

Queers fought, Thebes made a whole unit out of them and beat Sparta. They were explicitly thought to be stronger by having their lovers in battle with them. The society made men comrades, and the greatest speeches before and after battles involved talk of honor, bravery, chivalry, loyalty, and comraderie, from Henry V, and the speech of St Crispin, to Alexander the Great and the Opus Mutiny.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:37 AM
8

The Bible and apocrypha have alot of wisdom imo. Ecclesiastes 4, for example, directly addresses male brotherhood and comraderie. Though, as OP demonstrates, there are records in religious texts that are distasteful.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:59 AM
8

It was about the same, except he also burnt down everything but the fortress.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:42 AM
9

If you think that's bad, wait until you learn what Alexander the Great did to Thebes.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:37 AM
1

As a bisexual man, I do find status attractive, I'd certainly be open to a sugar momma.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:19 AM
7

Every single one I've seen speak on stage aside from the handful associated with CHS and Camile Paglia, and a couple YouTubers. As for your discussion of male on male crimes, I think the lack of discussion comes from a lack of ideas, the feminist lobbies would have us all brainwashed, and it's very difficult to find therapists that use newer behavior therapy for violent patients, and even more difficult to find a therapist to validate a male victim, and help them through trauma.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 12:43 AM
8

The equality feminism and freedom feminism of CHS and Camile Paglia, respectively, are definitely things I've gotten behind. They are what many think of when they hear feminism, but most feminists leaders I've seen are Dworkinists, or some other radical, mostly misandrist, or female supremacists.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 12:15 AM
3

Share the vid or it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 12:11 AM
10

Christina Hoff Somers is definitely someone to look at for reasons why this sub is distrustful, at best, when it comes to feminism. Though, be warned, she is considered conservative, and once had views which are highly controversial today. In her book, The War Against Boys, she details the methods the feminist and woman's lobby used to undermine efforts to help boys in education. This caused a crisis that we're still reeling from, many people here are MGTOWS, and actively discourage men and boys…
/r/MensRights04/04/24 11:58 PM
3

I'm a huge Christina Hoff Somers and Camile Paglia fan. But I am uninterested in discussion which cannot be seen by the public. Privacy is for pleasantries alone.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 11:42 PM
2

Well that's just the internet.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:28 PM
1

It's 60% men, 40% women watching porn. I would think the statistics are similar for what OP is talking about.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:26 PM
1

The burden of proof to the objectivity of you and OP's subjective opinions are on yourself and OP. If you would like to see the evidence relating to OP's opinion, Shadiversity's critique of the Barbie Movie lays it out. There are several YouTubers popular here which lay out your evidence based in character development. Such as ShoeOnHead and Brett Cooper. My argument with you stems from your rude, and toxicly masculine behavior in dismissing a fellow's opinion as hatred of women, when it was a s…
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:13 PM
1

That is a subjective opinion.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:19 PM
2

You, yourself, said that you are here to see posts that indicate oppression of males.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:07 PM
5

Yes, and no. Nothing has replaced the religious based society that effectively forced brotherhood and comraderie, these things started breaking down due to the humanist and deist lead enlightenment, and it only got worse. It wasn't just the comraderie, the village switched to the nuclear family due to that deconstruction as well. We've become so individualistic that most westerners completely reject, and are repulsed by these ideas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 06:01 PM
3

Do you not realize that media depictions are drivers of oppression? Being a majority doesn't make a group immune to prejudice, or systemic prejudice, if they're the only ones who are free game, then it's only a matter of time before they're the only oppressed class. Media depictions of men have been harmful for many years, there are very rare good fictional role models these days, most men in media are shown to be fools, imbeciles, or criminals.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:46 PM
6

The media representation of men is a men's issue, and this post doesn't imply hatred of women. Many watchers looked deeper than character depictions, and found the portrayal of society to promote harmful views. I didn't watch it myself, never cared for barbie.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:38 PM
5

Those were likely normal people who have better things to do than listen to gender politics.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:27 PM
58

How many times do I have to say that this is what feminists do, they use biased, if not made up statistics to fear monger and control narratives. Gloria Steinem starts one medical crisis with a few lies, and they all start doing it.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:20 PM
2

You mean like capitalism? Good luck with that, we are the drivers of that market, not women.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:17 PM
2

That's why I didn't want to add context, but you can very easily change, "employee" to, "man." I just didn't want to risk issues with plagiarism or confusion.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 11:54 AM
5

Doesn't everyone find status attractive? It's not the end all be all, but it certainly doesn't hurt.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 08:36 AM
1

The economy and social media
/r/MensRights04/04/24 08:24 AM
12

Female sexual crime perpetration Specifically, Sexual victimization perpetrated by women: Good to see these things get more serious attention.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 08:19 AM
4

English governess to siamese royalty complains about on the job treatment from the boss in song. It's worth a watch, very acclaimed play.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 08:10 AM
1

This is the first news I've heard out of Australia since those mentioned times, I apologize for the ignorance. Though I find it difficult to believe that the entire lobby for men's interest is gone.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:13 AM
-1

It's big for the MRM, gotta take what wins we can.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:12 AM
1

That is not how the world economy works, these packages are on lend-lease, and much of that goes to the treasury. For example, about 80% of the agreed debt that France owed the US for lends and leases in WW1 went directly into the US Treasury, the total French debt was over 4 billion dollars in early 1900s money.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:10 AM
-5

Sunrise Australia did a piece on Cassie Jaye and her red pill movie. It got the expected pushback. I am unfortunately finding it difficult to find the specific clip I'm looking for, but an Australian men's rights lobbyists got news attention before that.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:46 AM
1

People may not think much of biblical wisdom, or any religious wisdom. But the suicide rate is closely related to the loneliness epidemic, and Ecclesiastes 4 talks about male loneliness and lack of brotherhood, and essentially tells people in Ecclesiastes 9 to go out and make merry. Go out to be social, and make your support systems, and be a link in other's support systems.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:34 AM
2

"Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their toil. For if they fall, one will lift up his fellow. But woe to him who is alone when he falls and has not another to lift him up!"
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:18 AM
101

One would think the reason obvious.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:59 AM
7

"Your servant! Indeed I am not your servant. I am a free and independent employee!" -Anna Leonowens from Roger's and Hammerstein's The King and I I should make a post about these old Broadway lines.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:56 AM
0

The, "men don't cry," didn't die out. It changed to disciplinary actions over drawings of super heroes and battles, followed by invalidating their feelings after something so stupid.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:02 AM
4

They don't need the social assistance, no more than everybody else does.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 04:53 AM
4

Like I said, I'm not bashing traditionalism, but we do live in a modern world, where it rarely works. Traditionalism didn't give much back to men, only in marriage and employment really, and it took more than what is taken today. Queen Victoria would want to whip all of us as much as the feminists. The question was: How does the anti-feminism of Queen Victoria relate to men's rights?
/r/MensRights04/04/24 04:48 AM
7

Suggest sharing all over social media.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 03:56 AM
2

If you're insistent on not changing that standard, because you wouldn't be lowering it by changing it, then I'd suggest going to traditional religion and their houses of worship, that's is the best place to find the, "not before we're married," people. I would personally suggest Christianity, as I am biased.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 03:53 AM
-11

What are you on about? Modern men's rights made big news in Australia in the 2010s, just because no one's listening now, doesn't mean the people don't exist.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 03:51 AM
-3

She's got to be better than Trudeau.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 03:49 AM
4

Yes, I did know that. Now how does it relate to men's rights, because she also would be in favor of things like the draft and traditional male roles, not that anything is wrong with traditional male roles, but she would have been just as prudish about them as feminism.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 03:37 AM
0

I, personally, am sex worker positive. Those are free and independent men who can do as they will with their money.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 07:58 PM
41

The trick with essays is to trickle in your own opinions while outwardly remaining unbiased.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 07:02 PM
5

I've been saying for a while that we're just waiting for the old people to die so we can afford the houses.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 05:11 PM
4

Why would they want want to change the system that made them an actual God? Did that author decide to throw out the entirety of kemetic culture? TLDR, the author's an idiot, Cleopatra was losing her own civil war, and spent it besieged in Alexandria before Caesar got involved, she did not ascend unaccosted or non-violently. These were not women vs the patriarchy. The family just fucking hated each other, Cleopatra with her father and Rome killed another sister who had taken the throne in their o…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 05:01 PM
1

No, on the political side the people supporting the aide blocks usually think that the aide is damaging their own country's economy, when the Ukraine is actually taking on debt and interest, and it will only damage the aiding country if Ukraine loses. I did not refer to individuals or military units, this is an issue in the cores of allied nations.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 04:16 PM
1

That is not the definition if feminism. Oxford Languages Dictionary- the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. Brittanica- Feminism, the belief in social, economic, and political equality of the sexes. Although largely originating in the West, feminism is manifested worldwide and is represented by various institutions committed to activity on behalf of women’s rights and interests. Miriam-Webster- belief in and advocacy of the political, economic, and social equal…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 04:12 PM
2

Do you have a readable version?
/r/MensRights03/04/24 08:32 AM
26

I hope the Dark Forest as an answer to the Fermi Paradox becomes a popular discussion topic again.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 07:37 AM
143

Sounds like you should look for an employment lawyer. All HR cared about was getting me to say I did something, asking different versions of the same question. If I had not been a man this would have been a completely different situation, and that pisses me off that shit is so corrupt. No, they do that to everyone, they're not your friend, anything you give to HR must be colored as beneficial to the company.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 07:22 AM
1

For women
/r/MensRights03/04/24 05:00 AM
1

If NATO would get the aid going they would get the damn drones. It's only wasted if the Ukraine loses, every package is a package of debt on the Ukraine.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 04:49 AM
1

It's not about genetic legacy, it's about the family name.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 04:42 AM
-1

Adoption is a more viable option. Your mother sounds very traditional, and it sounds like they may be able to set up dates with the kind of person you'd like. Dating: Delusional female standards. Women want a rich, tall, attractive man whilst they aren't supermodels themselves to demand such caliber of men. Vast majority of men have been rated as unnatractive by women. It used to be the 80/20 rule but now it's the 95/5 rule. We're only expecting this to get worse. Most women aren't virgins befor…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 04:39 AM
3

I don't think the way they set up dating profiles is a good idea, and it says nothing about assuming things about certain groups of people. Aside from the dating profile advice, it's actually quite traditional. If you don't put your best out in dating, there won't be any gems as you burn the haystack.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 09:40 PM
9

I have not seen such behavior here, most posts about the Indian condition are well received from what I can tell.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 09:33 PM
1

You don't need to be a provider or overworked to participate in society.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 08:21 PM
1

And in what history have such conditions ever gotten better by ignoring the society?
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:28 PM
0

Absolutely, you will get nowhere by ignoring society.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:20 PM
-1

Bruh, stfu, you can't just relabel that pill people and mgtow bs it's stupid no matter what you call it.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:49 PM
1

Elaborate
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:43 PM
1

I think he just made it up, but I found the word in the writings of the modern Franco-Muslim world, and I can't read any of those books, as I can't understand the languages they were written in. But, from what I've found, it doesn't have much to do with OP's description. Edit: He's talking about things related to hypergamy and other pill people talk.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:42 PM
1

It shouldn't be completely avoided in a general men's blog, but these things are certainly not to be done early on. They invite too much controversy in an up-and-coming business.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:23 PM
7

Yes, that is the major argument of conservatives, that affirmative action destroys merit based society.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:16 PM
3

They did that so they could tax it btw. It should be like an EBT card, so it can't just be used for everything.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:03 PM
-1

This is all highly unprofessional, he should speak with his friends, lawyers, or therapists, you both should follow workplace policy.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 08:23 AM
3

The original Duluth Model was practically brainwashing and fell out in favor for CBT, to my knowledge. But the idea relating the Duluth Model to men's rights reportedly remains worldwide according to Google.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 08:19 AM
1

Is the MRM wholeheartedly taking a stance against sex work now? Can a political advocate not have a side business?
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:58 AM
-1

Why do you think she's a grifter? I'm willing to bet she's done a lot more for men than you, and most of her other detractors here.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:57 AM
0

It's good, she has purpose, it's the pill people and mgtows we need to shout down.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:54 AM
1

They don't pick their own lawyers, the judge makes all the real calls, you get a lawyer so someone sensible and in their right mind will speak to the judge with your case.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:43 AM
1

Child services follows policy, what you need is a lawyer.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:41 AM
1

This is why traditional dating is imperative, it exists to weed out crazy people.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:38 AM
1

Coming out of college and paying the debt off before 40 isn't something to complain about.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:36 AM
2

I don't think you understand that this isn't a US draft, the OP is saying Russia is impressing them.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:30 AM
3

Christina Hoff Somers wrote a book on this criticizing feminism. But she's hardly the only person to do so.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:24 AM
1

You can't think of anything productive to do? Do you have any goals?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:23 PM
1

I have a strong suspicion that you received low grades in your literature courses.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:32 PM
1

Reversing Vasectomies doesn't guarantee fertility, and there are reports of decreased fertility. The procedure takes longer, has a longer recovery time, is more expensive, and slightly more risky than the Vasectomy itself. Insurance does not usually cover the cost of this procedure. I understand this is a touchy subject for many, but you obviously did not read the post, there is nothing here promoting anything.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:08 PM
1

I'm an actually against the procedure. The history of the Vasectomy Procedure is related to Vasectomies, and men's rights, you are projecting some kind of motivation beyond basic education.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:02 PM
0

That has nothing to with the fact that there is nothing incorrect in my post, nor is there any misleading information in it. You seem to have a low opinion of men, considering you have the opinion that none of them would read the first half of the post. But, yes.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:45 AM
0

It is sterilization, but most sterilization methods are also under contraceptives. I have learned through this that it's not commonly known. I have said to seek proper medical advice from a physician, as I cannot attest to anything beyond basic information, those warnings were given at the beginning and end of the post.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:20 AM
0

That is also not misinformation, there are no other medical reasons for the procedure. I prefer to think better of other MRAs, but I have seen in the comments that many people either don't read, or have very selective eyesight. People are going to skip right to this section. Nothing in there about it being permanent. That needs to be stressed. Though I do see your point and will make that edit.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:04 AM
0

A Vasectomy is a surgical procedure used for permanent birth control There was no misinformation, it is right under the question, "What is a Vasectomy?"
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:39 AM
2

Have you tried betterhelp, if you still want to try it, I've heard they let patients switch on a whim?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:22 AM
1

If you actually read the post you'd see that the Vasectomy procedure has a dark history directly related to men's rights, and involving forced sterilization. But otherwise this is something that disproportionately effects men, in 100% of cases, and that is something that makes it appropriate according to sub rules.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 07:58 AM
1

You seem to hold a lot of hostility. I'll have you know that I'm about as anti-feminist as one could be, thoroughly in the camp of Christina Hoff Somers, and everything put into my post was politically and socially neutral. Nobody is here pressuring you, the flair explicitly states, "education." And this is an issue of men, and men alone.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 07:47 AM
-2

Because the argument was over the original commenter's definition of a contraceptive, which is not the scientific definition, and their categorization was incorrect even under their definition.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 07:31 AM
-1

Firstly, that is an overreaction. Secondly, that percentage comes from a reliable source, and does not imply that the fertility remains high. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521749/#:~:text=Vasectomy%20reversal%20is%20a%20commonly,40%E2%80%9380%25%20of%20couples. Thirdly, yes there are other variables. Fourthly, I have discussed another method pertaining to men in depth before. I do mostly promote condoms. Fifthly, I have not, in any case, promoted frivolous use of surgical procedu…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 07:19 AM
-1

Reversal has an 80% success rate on the low end. But contraceptives also don't have your requirements to make them contraceptives in the definition. They are just things that prevent pregnancy. Edit: due to some confusion over Reversal success rate and fertility rate, I will add that pregnancy in couples who had the reversal is successful at 40% on the low end. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521749/#:~:text=Vasectomy%20reversal%20is%20a%20commonly,40%E2%80%9380%25%20of%20couples V…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:44 AM
2

Idk if I'd go that far, there are still risks, and students aren't always capable of thinking that far ahead, condoms are still the best around.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:18 AM
1

Obviously, you are the one who described reasons why contraception exists, and exactly why Vasectomy is considered a permanent contraceptive, and then said, But that’s how it should be seen, not as long lasting contraception.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:14 AM
0

Do you understand what contraception is?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:10 AM
3

That probably was a physician, not a therapist, therapists can't usually prescribe medication.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:06 AM
4

Now, I'm not saying it's not wrong, but were you there to talk about loneliness? Could it have been a genuine question?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:24 AM
6

Is Andrew Tate just clickbait? Are they sure they want to attract that cult?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:09 AM
3

Are you saying you were caught wanking off in your parent's bedroom?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:00 AM
2

No one has attacked you, you came onto a sub that is highly critical of feminism, for good reason, and started with a defense of feminism as a whole, you didn't even specify what feminism you're talking about until people started arguing your defense of feminism. Then you proceeded to prove every one of them correct, as you started listing misandric talking points.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 12:16 AM
3

That is a skill issue with your own writing, by defending feminism in the beginning, you place a theme and tone on the entire work that, perhaps, you didn't mean.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 12:13 AM
6

Did you notice that you came here to defend feminism, and have decided to spout hatred of men?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 12:03 AM
3

You are sitting here rejecting and hating men, while they tell you their concerns in a place that is supposed to be safe for them.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 12:00 AM
1

Yeah, "some" groups. I'm not saying women do not cause issues for men, but a LOT of the time men are more sexist to men than women. It's nearly all of them, if it weren't then feminists like Camile Paglia would be leading voices, and not persona non grata. While they are getting better, it is only incremental, and the stain that Dworkinism put on the wider feminism is not easily forgotten. Most people here would be feminists, but feminism is more than its definition. Just look at Andrew Tate. Ho…
/r/MensRights26/03/24 11:57 PM
4

Some of those feminists resorted to terrorism. At one point some suffragettes in England tried to blow up a damn, which would have destroyed a town.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 11:30 PM
2

Feminism, and many groups under the umbrella of feminism have actively attempted to disenfranchise men and boys, and have been very successful at times. It isn't just everyday conversation, feminist groups often put themselves in the way of progress for men. The male education crisis is a perfect example, and one we are still fixing today, feminists lobbies had a direct hand in proliferating it, and harming the attempts to aid boys in education. They did this by sabotaging the aid for boys, ofte…
/r/MensRights26/03/24 11:16 PM
1

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaBYW76inbX5XWJ8IJd9MKucLnkAzK28E&si=sOeDFzczKsmThedI
/r/MensRights26/03/24 06:26 PM
5

YouTuber Kings and generals covers the battles fairly well, not perfectly, but well enough.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 06:06 PM
1

She's fighting against banning it too, because she's fighting against men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:55 PM
5

No one is using it against feminists, you are projecting, it is a men's issue that you are fighting against for no reason.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 07:32 AM
2

There's a handful of prominent feminists that are relatively respected in these circles, but feminism has a highly political and shady past, and there are particular ideas, groups, and people tied to it whether you like it or not. Camille Paglia and Christina Hoff Somers are a couple who are quite well respected.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 07:18 AM
7

He is an Earl, yes.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 08:39 PM
2

I've also heard many things in person.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 08:34 PM
1

I'm curious what language you are referring to. Do they have their own dialect or something? The general rhetoric.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 07:48 PM
11

That's alot of money. You could just join an average country club at that point.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 06:25 PM
8

It doesn't really say much, beyond complaining about stereotyping. The things I see here are mostly defending sexism against men, simply by saying it's fine because feminism has aided non-white men, and some white men in the past.Which is true, no one denies that. There is nothing about the issue of men as a whole a whole here after 2014. It conveniently avoids the use language commonly used by feminists even in the time period this piece focuses on.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:46 PM
2

Utah State Legislature Home H.B. 414 Due Process Amendments Bill Sponsor: Rep. Teuscher, Jordan D. Floor Sponsor: Sen. Weiler, Todd D. Substitute Sponsor: Rep. Teuscher, Jordan D. Drafting Attorney: Rhonda Bailey Fiscal Analyst: Joseph Ryan Fitzgerald Information Last Action: 12 Mar 2024, Governor Signed Last Location: Lieutenant Governor's office for filing Similar Bills Student Health and Safety Higher Education Students Student Privacy Sections Affected 63G-7-301 67-5-1 H.B. 414 1st Sub. Repr…
/r/MensRights23/03/24 08:11 AM
1

Does that context not remove this from men's rights and issues?
/r/MensRights23/03/24 06:30 AM
24

I had a male orgasm education post on a sub similar to this, didn't gain as much traction as the condom one did, shame I deleted it. But, yes, and it's not just with boners, I'd say men could listen in anatomy too, especially on their own body systems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/24 06:21 AM
3

I see, so you're shaming dominatrixes?
/r/MensRights23/03/24 06:17 AM
5

might use it as an excuse to hit you back. Apparently these women think men want her to hit him as an excuse to beat their girlfriends, In general they are more likely doing this to get someone arrested. Do you think it's some kind of kink?
/r/MensRights23/03/24 06:11 AM
10

That's is why you avoid hitting back, you treat the weaker abuser like the animal they're acting like, and use body pressure to make your way to an exit. If you are weaker, run, both figuratively and actually run. Then call the police. Always have a secret go-bag, we really need them more than women as we don't have the shelters.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 06:07 AM
1

I only watch Brett Cooper.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:57 AM
4

In her defense, it is known, through multiple experiments that groups of unserpervised young boys are quite destructive without some kind of influence. They would get into smaller groups like pods or clubs, and they found it hard to organize chores, and it would often end in violence. But they're not completely self destructive, eventually someone comes out as leader. https://youtube.com/watch?v=bCePbRdQmbE&si=FsZebQlbIo-Yx3AS Girls in the same experiments were prone to throwing individuals they…
/r/MensRights23/03/24 12:02 AM
1

The video you've shared.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 04:41 AM
2

Why, did you not like it?
/r/MensRights22/03/24 04:39 AM
24

I thought that video was older than it is.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:37 AM
2

Can you specify the variables?
/r/MensRights22/03/24 01:14 AM
1

Write in to your representatives.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 04:53 PM
4

PSA- Condoms are not flushable, you are supposed to tie them, and dispose of them yourself.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 04:37 AM
2

Condoms are not flushable, you are supposed to tie them, and dispose of them yourself.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 12:05 AM
2

Interesting, guess that's what happens when you live a life of illegal debauchery.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 03:59 PM
7

Ok, then how did you old people work a full-time job on the midshift and night shift and lead a balanced life where you regularly went out while everything was closed during your waking off hours, and while you had to sleep or work during the day until every recreational area was closed? My grandparents didn't have these hours, they weren't in competition with their elders. Both them and my parents had options beyond 24/7 gas stations to go to when they did mid and night shifts. Most of us don't…
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:54 AM
4

There would be the same amount of cases, they don't exactly care about getting caught, they're rapists, they are only focused on exerting their power. What I called for both removes them from society and allows society to extract value from them.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 05:30 AM
2

Well if those shelters were better funded, then the rehabilitation rate would be higher, and the escape rate would be lower. Men's Rights advocacy on shelters isn't just about DV shelters.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 05:22 AM
6

I don't believe in the death penalty, no one deserves to die no matter the crime. If there is irrefutable proof, put them in the company run prisons forever, no appeals, a body is a body.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:37 AM
4

Tomato tomato
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:24 AM
4

Yea, the law was much clearer by the 90s, but the conversations around these crimes were still questionable. This movie does seem to imply sympathy for the couple, who did love each other and are still married, but she still committed a crime with someone who could not consent.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:13 AM
4

There are plenty of context clues in my comment to tell you that, "rarely," meant, "not used as we know it today." Many more things are considered rape today than were in the 90s.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 03:23 AM
24

It would really help if boomers like her took the second shift job positions instead of all the day shift spots in given career fields.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 02:55 AM
8

Ok, but you extrapolated that from the use of, "affair." I'm just saying it was accurate to the period the film is talking about.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 02:52 AM
5

In it's defense, rape was a term rarely used, even in the 90s, there were still people debating whether forced oral could be considered rape or not. So it is relatively accurate to the decade.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 02:22 AM
2

Gemini is also an unreliable source.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 09:07 AM
2

Wait until you learn about suffragette terrorism. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_suffragette_bombings More recently: Students who have been successfully trained in the feminist classroom to "become agents of change" may embarrass their mentors by practicing what they have learned right on the campus. At Simon's Rock of Bard College in Barrington, Massachusetts, twenty students who were not satisfied that the formal procedures of the university adequately protected students from sexual h…
/r/MensRights16/03/24 09:00 AM
1

Men are not going to get the kind of breast cancer they're looking for in women, men don't have mammaries.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 08:30 AM
1

It was all the other hypocrisy first.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 08:26 AM
2

This is dumb, chat GPT is not a reliable source.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 08:26 AM
2

That's what the radical feminists always do, Gloria Steinem started the trend of statistic manipulation. The Duluth Model is rarely used anymore, it involved what may as well have been brainwashing.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 08:22 AM
6

No
/r/MensRights16/03/24 07:03 AM
2

That's not something that would happen, monogamy is genderless, and you would/should both be shamed for these issues.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 03:11 AM
4

Ikr, progress in the wrong direction.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 03:09 AM
9

It's more about the lawsuits, they know your word of mouth has little value
/r/MensRights09/03/24 08:00 AM
21

It's their job to protect the company, not women.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 07:52 AM
138

Contact HR over harassment and unprofessional behavior.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 05:53 AM
2

What would be the point? We all complain about the same things, overworked, understaffed, underpaid, etc.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 05:34 AM
1

Prenuptial Agreements Separate Finances
/r/MensRights09/03/24 05:30 AM
2

Yes, featured on sci-fi, with Alec Newman as Paul, Julie Cox as Irulan, and William Hurt as Duke Leto. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Herbert%27s_Dune Followed by the Children of Dune miniseries, which added Susan Surandon to the cast, and replaced Saskia Reeves with Alice Krige as Jessica, and featured James McAvoy as Leto II. Children of Dune also won an emmy. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Herbert%27s_Children_of_Dune They had quite the B-list cast.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 05:17 AM
0

Yes, the miniseries goes that far, and I am aware of the lore. That's when Herbert was really into anti-religious propaganda.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 10:42 PM
1

That's literally the only thing that isn't woke in it, and even that's debatable.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 09:53 PM
-1

Well, did you try?
/r/MensRights27/02/24 07:03 PM
0

I mean... it was pretty liberal for its time too. I'm not complaining, I couldn't get through the book due to it's aged prose, but I've seen all screen media, mini-series was the best version.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 06:02 PM
-3

Idk man, there's nothing about a bunch of rebels based in an arab-like culture portrayed as the good guys, fighting an empire, all wrapped in anti-religious propaganda that doesn't screem of modern woke-ness.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 05:27 PM
1

Why don't you post your stories against a, "her?"
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:52 PM
-3

Was Dune not always woke?
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:42 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:36 PM
6

Caps mean that your are yelling and/or screaming.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:05 PM
6

Progress can only be made by going in and getting the degrees, then it's just a wait to take the jobs. The first thing you need are credentials to start a school of men's studies.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 07:18 AM
1

You mean the person who found a loophole to justify brainwashing? Have you ever seen or studied how the Duluth Model worked in practice?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 06:53 AM
-1

You can ask to hangout on bumble BFF, this sounds like a skill issue. What you seem to want is a club.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 06:40 AM
1

Idk man, ever met a nihilist? They're pretty similar.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 06:36 AM
1

I have a theory that we are socialized to glance at any given thing and know whether we can fight it or not, and that determines our fight/flight responses. (Even if the instinct is incorrect). So idk if I'd say we just walk in and have respect.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 06:26 AM
1

Second time I've said it, these two are doing it for clout.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 06:24 AM
1

Has nothing to do with the fact you said specifically messy squirting is usually not as it seems. Which it very well can be because it's a very real thing that happens. You're moving the goalpost, you accused me of denying its existence. No one said anything about politics. Even OPs claim wasn't at all political. Debatable, very. Political, not at all. Your attitude alone suggest that you find this an issue of sexism, you practically said so in another comment. Never said that it did. Just thoug…
/r/MensRights27/02/24 04:41 AM
1

Women's ejaculate isn't white and sticky, it has the look and consistency of evaporated milk, which is not sticky. It is smooth and creamy. I did not say that squirting isn't real, but that female ejaculate is as said above, and it comes from a place known as the paraurethral glands, or Skene's Glands. What we see as squirting is still debated to be pee, or unique, but it's composition is only slightly off from average urine, and comes from the bladder. The education here was mostly for the fema…
/r/MensRights26/02/24 12:57 AM
-2

That is not how the world works.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 07:00 PM
-2

Whether or not you believe it has failed, or hates men, or both, this anti Academia narrative is harmful to men and men's rights. It should be the main objective right now. You cannot make change without influence over education, it is imperative, and my arguments against the idea that men are systemically pushed out of education are in my main comment. As for the man-hating you mention, it is mostly done by loud extremists, and wider society doesn't listen to it, it should be challenged, but a …
/r/MensRights25/02/24 04:25 PM
1

Then don't talk about women in any negative manner. Don't talk about men's issues in conversation about women and their issues. You can introduce the conversation and, in doing so, remind anyone who tries hijacking the conversation what said conversation is about, in a professional, polite, and integrous manner.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 08:46 AM
1

Talking on marriage and love, and family, there is the school of EFT, emotional focused therapy. One of the experts in this field, Sue Johnson, discusses the old fantastical idea of fleeting love and social constraints of the past, vs the new idea of long lasting love-based relationships in the freedom of the western world. https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xa5J3Qiw69c&si=Ritbk4eniA3wCS4j
/r/MensRights25/02/24 08:24 AM
19

The answer is that we are in the same boat on rights, and men's only reproductive decisions lie in abstinence, condoms, or nothing. The arguments are over perceived privileges, and the anti-male attitude of so many women's rights groups boils down to money and funding. That can be seen in the early days of the ongoing boy's education crisis, when women's rights groups would vehemently argue against programs for boys, often bringing the threat of lawsuits.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 07:59 AM
60

In short, they have a history of misrepresenting studies and statistics, sometimes outright making them up. They've also had a history of fabricating crises. This isn't the average feminist mind you, for example, it was Gloria Steinem who single handedly manufactured the anorexia epidemic by outright lying about the numbers, the media simply ran with it. https://youtube.com/watch?v=1HX1Ae-ZJgs&si=hQnrYEqjiZe3RBeP https://youtube.com/watch?v=Uo01-NHoeBk&si=umV6drPYrillOe23 https://youtube.com/wat…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 07:48 AM
1

Mine is about the use of statistics, it really has nothing to do with crime. I literally just explained it. It's also not an analogy. I suppose I'm asking you to explain to me how exactly your links back up your argument that there are more LGBT people because feminism wants there to be. I am open to such an idea I, myself, am highly critical of the likes of Andrea Dworkin, and she would have loved to see all cis-men go trans, she'd likely be rolling in her grave to know there are FTMs as well.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:57 AM
-7

I disagree with the premise. Society does not hate men. But it has failed men in the areas that were discussed. Academia doesn't hate men, narratives around rape and the economy may make men and boys intimidated by Academia, but it doesn't hate men. It needs men more than ever, and men need to get into higher education more than ever. You may be worried about false accusations, but you're not supposed to go there to play the raunchy fool, or even to get romantic. You may be worried about money, …
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:18 AM
1

I understood what you're saying, I disagree with it. The ice cream myth is something taught to us in grade school to explain how statistics seemingly related could have other variables that would make them unrelated. So with crime and ice cream sales, the variable is summertime, the heat of the summer causes crime to rise, but also ice cream sales to increase. I'm not so sure your statistics truly back your claim.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:53 AM
11

Assuming one would still subscribe to the ring idea, it would be an Andro-peripheral Matriarchy.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 04:15 AM
0

Do you even know what the lesson behind Sodom and Gomorrah was? It was sacred hospitality, not burn the gays. The same lesson the Hellenes taught with Philemon and Baucis.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 04:09 AM
53

Patriarchy is a buzzword to be sexist and get attention. But the system they mean may be something. Some people refer to it as a gyno-centric patriarchy. One could think of it in rings, all men are on the outer ring, taking the worst and best of the world and society, while women are on the inner ring, being infantilized, and only given what men allow to get through the first ring. Someone posted a picture of gears earlier, that could also show how their idea of how patriarchy works. Nevertheles…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 03:45 AM
6

Yes, and ice cream causes crime because crime increases with ice cream sales. /s
/r/MensRights25/02/24 03:17 AM
2

His only directive, for the purpose of this incident, would have been to avoid the conflict. He was literally punished twice before for making conflict, you are the idiot, employees are to follow, not lead.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 03:15 AM
2

I never said I agreed with the manager, I'm saying the employee has a job based on the managers orders, and it is not the employee's job to question the manager.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 03:13 AM
1

If the lead allowed it, then they're responsible, and it is not OPs job to hold them to that, they aren't that person's manager.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 03:11 AM
1

No, he didn't, he said, Because I have morals? And perhaps because I would get in trouble if I didn't charge them.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 02:48 AM
1

Except he's never been punished for customers stealing.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 02:42 AM
0

Sir, if you don't learn how the professional workplace works, you will not do well. I hope you do find a company that aligns with your values, but a good employee can work anywhere without being involved in incidents like these.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 02:26 AM
1

He was disciplined twice for making an issue with customers over this exact thing, and he proceeds to do it again, and then proceeded to back talk the employee who was in charge. That is not professional behavior, nor would it be considered good performance.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 02:22 AM
0

OP got more chances than most employees, he himself is framing it as sexism, but any good professional would see it's his own idiocy. I suggest you take some classes on professionalism, if you think OP didn't do anything wrong.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 02:06 AM
0

He was fine until he made a scene about the bill, and argued with the hostess, who was obviously in charge, otherwise he wouldn't need to go to her at all. He was given more chances than most employees would be given, he did not follow expectations, expectations that were laid out to him multiple times.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 02:00 AM
1

The woman in question was his lead, that's why he kept going to her over this table. He was back talking the person in charge, after he was told multiple times not to act like this towards customers.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:51 AM
-1

To avoid conflicts with customers, that much is obvious, that's what the employer wanted.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:35 AM
1

It was not his employer's expectation, and that was made clear to OP. He would not have been subject to verbal abuse had he followed directions.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:33 AM
1

Yea, but he got punished for making a scene of it, which means that he is expected to avoid the conflict. While the boss could have made things clearer, it is still obvious that OP was told not to do exactly what he did.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:29 AM
3

How does it not make sense? There was another time about a year ago where a similar situation happened where 5 teenagers tried to eat the salad bar without paying for it and when I told them I would have to charge them for it they cursed me out and I told them to get out. My boss had gotten mad at me for that too and said that they could scream racism because two of them were black. I said that race had nothing to do with it but that if I'm going to get punished for trying to do the job right th…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:18 AM
2

Did you read the post? OP went against workplace policy, that policy was made clear to him. He got fired for being an idiot who can't understand his job duties.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:12 AM
-1

You literally got into trouble because you made a big deal of it, you clearly wouldn't have gotten in trouble if you followed your boss's orders.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:10 AM
-1

No employment lawyer would take this case, OP is unequivocally in the wrong, and his boss had told him more than once that his customers are always right. He actively went against expectations that were reasonable, and made very clear to him.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:08 AM
5

So, I hate to tell you this, but in a workplace you have to look at company culture, and follow the command structure. You literally did the exact thing that your boss told you not to do, you disrespected him, and actually disregarded orders. You said he told you multiple times that the customers are always right, and to leave this kind of drama be; he told you that a year ago, according to you. Your boss put that hostess in charge for a reason, and you refused to follow that chain in the comman…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:02 AM
1

My original point was not that it's perfect, but that we could do it. Formula is the furthest along, you're arguing that there was no replacement. Even in the research I'm referring to, the success rate was lower than 50% in many of these tests. Formula is nearly 100% capable of replacing breast milk. The amount of babies who can't take Formula, given the different brands and mixes and types, is quite negligible. Even before formula, people had success with pig's and goat's milk.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 09:06 PM
3

You know, a bit of optimism is healthy. The great wars didn't last that long, and change came quickly.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:01 PM
6

Can happiness be held under a guillotine? Nobody says that the West is best. But the ideals of the Muslim brotherhood in the Muslim world, are so extreme, and entrenched, that they literally refused peace with the West for a measly 4 years. They just couldn't do it. There is no possibility for reformation without war. You're talking about an area of the planet that stones people for victimless crimes.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 05:36 PM
7

Meh, that's pretty average as far as radical feminists go.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:46 AM
1

I didn't provide any examples, this whole post is about a specific example of genetic research that requires animal testing.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:03 AM
3

You're going through a lot of life changes, that tends to give us some mental issues from stress to depression. Have you tried therapy, like BetterHelp?
/r/MensRights24/02/24 05:40 AM
2

All About Formula Feeding Commercially prepared infant formulas are a nutritious alternative to breast milk, and even contain some vitamins and nutrients that breastfed babies need to get from supplements. https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/breast-bottle-feeding.html#:~:text=Commercially%20prepared%20infant%20formulas%20are,need%20to%20get%20from%20supplements.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 05:32 AM
1

Context clues should make it very clear as to the type of genetic research that was referred to.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 04:53 AM
2

The dude wants to live in a commune, they're all kind of culty.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 04:49 AM
1

No, there are different types of Amish, like there are different types of Mormons.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 03:44 AM
4

There are conservative feminists, at least conservative in comparison to American progressive, certainly so by European standards. Also, though I myself lean right, most conservatives aren't your friends, their whole anti-trans agenda is based on the idea that men are predators.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 03:41 AM
1

2 tabs make a paragraph.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 02:47 AM
2

I’ve never heard tale of one. Commune may be the keyword you were missing.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 02:36 AM
8

Those exist, the hard part is figuring which ones aren't cults. You can go Amish, they do what you are asking, but the hard part there is also figuring which ones are regular Amish, and which ones are cults.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 02:29 AM
2

It can though, some sources say it's healthier.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 12:49 AM
1

I gotta be honest, at this point I believe they're both working together for clout.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 12:45 AM
3

This article doesn't even help OP's point, I don't think they read it. All it does is defend the people saying that men are no longer needed. It defends them by saying, "it's a joke." A sexist joke is still sexist, and many are serious about it. That, "satire," isn't all man hating is either.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 05:22 PM
1

This isn't men's rights, this is only a women's issue.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 05:09 PM
10

It's usually an all encompassing dress code, the schools in question likely have uniforms.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 07:39 AM
2

What about your mother?
/r/MensRights23/02/24 07:38 AM
2

Why won't you tell your parents?
/r/MensRights23/02/24 07:28 AM
30

They'll deny access to campus, possibly education, or use other disciplinary actions.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 07:26 AM
-1

I have a low opinion of genetic research, too ethical to test it on people, not ethical enough to allow their creations to live, it's honestly a terrible industry. Edit: Idk who downvoted this, but for those who don't know what that person is defending, if this theory creates artificial sperm, it will go on to animal testing, and all the animals are euthanized after the process, including the animals birthed from the artificial sperm. That is how these things work, it is law in many places. At b…
/r/MensRights23/02/24 07:21 AM
-13

He feels threatened because scientists learned to make artificial sperm.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 07:10 AM
60

We already know how to replace a women's role in reproduction in a lab. We've made artificial embryos, tested in mice. We've learned that you only need an embryo and sperm to have a viable baby, we've tested it in mice. And we have artificial wombs, we have successfully tested that with sheep. This is all years old news.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 07:08 AM
1

Have you told your ex, or therapist about this?
/r/MensRights23/02/24 07:04 AM
1

The majority of men want to please their partner sexually, both for themselves and their partner's pleasure. The majority of men and women, to this date, don't know where the G-spot is, if they know it exists at all. Many don't realize that squirting is not that mess you see on pornography where a pornstar has held their pee for an explosive release, but that the female ejaculation involves a substance with the look and consistency of condensed/evaporated milk. Many men and women don't realize t…
/r/MensRights23/02/24 06:26 AM
1

What I'm telling both you, and OP, is that not a single bit of this is political, none of it is discrimination. Yet you both decry it as sexism. if someone's partner is wanting to know why their partner isn't orgasming, it's because she hasn't been orgasming at all. That is the reason for prioritizing. Yes, that's precisely what I told OP, this is not an issue of discrimination, it's simply what people have asked about. In this case, we're advocating for teaching men the anatomy of their own bod…
/r/MensRights23/02/24 05:46 AM
1

So yeah, I agree most people deserve the best orgasms they can have but don't start acting like women's sexual needs have ever been prioritized. They have been regularly prioritized though, throughout the entire history of sexual education. The whole reason OP rarely sees male orgasm spoken about is because the men and women talking sex usually want to know why the female partner isn't orgasming, it is often paired with worry that they are having an unhappy sex life.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 04:29 AM
1

Dr Ruth Westheimer is New York's loneliness ambassador.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 04:14 AM
10

I'm pretty sure Franke was a willing partner, she was already doing questionable punishment, like having her oldest boy sleep in their living room on a bean bag chair, after taking his bed as punishment for 6 months.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 03:49 AM
12

Is there a LN or novel version?
/r/MensRights23/02/24 03:44 AM
-3

I have never once seen such an assumption. The reason why female orgasm is talked about more is quite simply because it's asked about more. It's not discrimination. Downvotes don't change the fact that OP is objectively incorrect. You can go as far back as the beginning of sex education and listen to people call into Sexually Speaking with Dr Ruth Westheimer to ask about pleasuring men. Several men even asked for themselves. You can watch it happen on Talk Sex with Sue Johanson too, those clips …
/r/MensRights23/02/24 03:30 AM
1

Yes, but is he saying it would give the Washingtonian men more jobs, is he saying that continuing this policy is harmful, or both? I'm pretty sure anyone outside Washington state completing the survey wouldn't have their survey count, usually they only count the possible constituents.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 02:27 AM
2

And what does it have to do with the demographics of construction workers and bus drivers?
/r/MensRights23/02/24 12:35 AM
1

Idk man, I only remember people who watched her pornography talking about her, and even then they only talked about her nipples.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 12:26 AM
3

Trigger warning of child abuse Case developments to a certain point https://youtube.com/watch?v=c6nmIgZPFPs&si=igjnMGYe_hnUY50I 911 transcript https://youtube.com/watch?v=sHehS9WLLuE&si=zrQWiOMkZ0I2hf4Z
/r/MensRights23/02/24 12:02 AM
2

I don't think the wider world even knows who Reid is.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 11:02 PM
14

No, the actual sentence was yesterday, but it wasn't surprising, we have the 911 calls, the victim statements, the videos of the rest of the kids getting rescued by law enforcement. It would be more shocking if it were a lighter sentence, though she really should be in for life, no exceptions.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 05:39 PM
-21

That's old news bruh, about a month ago. Edit: Trigger warning of child abuse Case developments to a certain point https://youtube.com/watch?v=c6nmIgZPFPs&si=igjnMGYe_hnUY50I 911 transcript https://youtube.com/watch?v=sHehS9WLLuE&si=zrQWiOMkZ0I2hf4Z
/r/MensRights22/02/24 05:15 PM
1

Me quoting you, In Christianity, all the pressure is put on the man. The same thing for non religious men. But not every Christian or Non Christian marriage is the same? Some men want you to wait on them hand and foot. My response from referenced comment, I beg to differ there, all the churches I've been to, and I travel alot, don't give 2 fucks. The context there shows that the churches in question did not, "give 2 fucks," about gender roles.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 11:36 AM
2

I've always considered myself a realist, though realists would likely call me pessimistic. It sounds like your worldview has been challenged, yes minorities are more than capable of doing the deeds they complain about, and they often do.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 11:29 AM
4

That can be categorized under toxic feminity, but every human under the sun is capable of it.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 11:12 AM
13

I'm highly critical of MGTOW and pill idealogues, the labels have meaning beyond the implications and annograms. I frankly cannot comprehend how you went through life thinking women can't be toxic. They're humans ffs.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 10:57 AM
1

No, I quoted your statement about religion's hand in gender roles, and disputed it, I did not say the churches were cold towards people.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 10:33 AM
1

I never complained about the Baptists, idk where you got that idea, nor did I complain about women.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 09:14 AM
0

US, mostly Baptist, though that denomination itself isn't organized at all.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 08:29 AM
3

In Christianity, all the pressure is put on the man. The same thing for non religious men. But not every Christian or Non Christian marriage is the same? Some men want you to wait on them hand and foot. I beg to differ there, all the churches I've been to, and I travel alot, don't give 2 fucks. The Bible itself doesn't actually say much about who should make all the money, but it does put the wife in charge of family finances.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:50 AM
9

There's life after cheaters man, you're only 22.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:31 AM
4

🙄 why do you feel like it's a scam question
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:27 AM
1

If you read the other comments, you'd know this was in a prominent sub, you have to pick your battles, not everything offensive is hate.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:18 AM
1

I kid you not, I thought she retired.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:14 AM
2

Authoritarianism is usually the blanket term if you want to be proper about it, but anyone who wouldn't get the use of fascism in this case is just being pedantic.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:00 AM
1

My guess it's that it's the amount of reports, not anything that's actually said. The message reddit sent me in this case stated that I was not the first reporter. So obviously the room matters as well, you can't just go on a feminist sub and be openly anti-feminist, you'd get mass reported.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:57 AM
-7

Literally never, I've found that going Dutch is best. Weeds out gold diggers like that, and proves good character.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:45 AM
0

I think you should avoid political subs for a while, any subs that aren't meant to be therapeutic and happy as well. Seek therapy, have you tried BetterHelp?
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:16 AM
-2

Don't worry about it, those two didn't even get a second date. Wtf would you even come if you can't afford your own meal, and it was a cheap fast food place both times too. I'm not a damn charity.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 05:56 AM
1

I honestly don't think she does know what you're asking, considering my own interaction.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 05:35 AM
2

No, wrong about the second part. I was in the military basic training part. I saw the army, but now I can give my opinion about why women aren't in the infantry You literally said that you were/are in the reserves. I can give my opinion about why women aren't in the infantry It could be in part that they don't have the skills for it. There are men that they won't put in the front lines either. I can only speak on the Canadian military. But then logically speaking I think the Americans and any Mi…
/r/MensRights22/02/24 05:33 AM
1

You shouldn't, semantics are important to the English language, especially when you're arguing something.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 03:00 AM
1

Were you paid?
/r/MensRights22/02/24 02:40 AM
3

It's quite misleading though, don't you think? Sex is commonly used as an explicitly positive word, they should be considered separate, especially since rape is not a crime of sex drive, or sexuality, rapists rape for the same reason abusers abuse.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 02:16 AM
1

You answered the question about Mexico. You did not answer what any of this data has to with men's issues, or what stance on men's issues you're using this data for. You just stated that you're in the military and gave me your life story.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 02:00 AM
6

None of that answers my question.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 01:38 AM
1

Rape is not sex.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 01:15 AM
-3

He practically admitted to being a sugar baby. I've not ever gotten anything more than time from the men I've dated. Only two of them were given more than they deserved. Nor have I had to give anything, except for two cases.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:23 AM
3

You're not including Mexico? What exactly are you trying to say about this in relationship to men's rights?
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:21 AM
1

This was on the AMA sub, so, take that how you will.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:17 AM
6

I've reported some questionable things and seen action taken.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:09 AM
2

Idk about that, unless something happens, most girls are daddy's girl.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 11:33 PM
1

The thing is, they aren't the level of minority you're describing, and I'm not so sure they can be called a silent majority. I don't know what the exact statistics would be, but in my own experience, irl, and even on reddit, it's roughly 1/3. So, there is alot of influence there. But, yes, even most of them see Feminism as women's rights alone, and that is what many definitions include. We should be so hostile to feminism itself when the extremists aren't on another rampage, in between those tim…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 11:32 PM
1

People have intrinsic value, you don't need to struggle to be useful.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 06:44 PM
1

That's all the more reason to support her. Feminism has a shit ton of internal politics. Not supporting such figures would be self-sabotage. She told people all about it in her books. It would be like the US turning against Israel, all those other countries want to nuke the US, it wouldn't be smart to alienate one of the only real allies, especially the influential one. I personally respect Somers more for her attempts to reach the 3rd wave, despite having to go through the barbed wire of extrem…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 06:06 PM
8

Why should they not be equal?
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:44 PM
7

A, "brilliant bit of satire," called a manifesto, written by a known terrorist.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:33 PM
2

Gloria Steinem has an interesting history in manufacturing crises.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:28 PM
1

Yes, Christina Hoff Somers goes into that as well. I've been in and out of the gender wars for a while, I am well aware of the situation.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:24 PM
4

TLDR, outside of whatever relationship this has with men's rights, I don't think that the world is in a situation where it's a good idea to pull military funds.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 10:03 AM
6

CHS was literally on the front line during the campus rape crisis, and the early boy's education crisis. She was quite influential. I sincerely hope you aren't so obtuse as to think you can help the cause without truly knowing the group you're arguing against, but education has been failing men for decades. You would do more harm than good if that's so.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 09:25 AM
1

Well, I'd say my own parents did the modern family thing well, one on third shift, one on first shift until I could drive, separate finances. I think alot of people get together for the benefits, and don't bother to think of the logistics, or love.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 08:56 AM
14

That is a necessary goal for change though, to get more sympathetic people in those positions. That's what the radical feminists did.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 08:50 AM
8

Get your doctorate in a liberal art, and take a professor position.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 08:43 AM
1

That's stupid, no one even plays WOW anymore. I'll also remind you that the storyline is pretty serious, just because you refuse to recognize art, doesn't mean it's not art. Make your kids go outside, let them whine about being board, don't waste your time on redundant vendettas.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 08:38 AM
1

I thought my choices were bad, is she at least doing well on anti-corruption?
/r/MensRights21/02/24 08:28 AM
1

why do you not see that this circle are the fundamentals of conservatism and before the industrial revolution it was just religion... Because most conservatives don't believe that everything given to women and children must go through the men, and the main religion often related to patriarchy in the west literally says the opposite, with the women in a role that controlled the family finances. The particularly bad examples of sexism didn't come until more barbaric tribes came into Europe, with a…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 08:07 AM
1

I'm not sure I agree that it's all conservatism, many classic liberals are lobbed in with conservatives now, and the nuclear family isn't their only issue. Think of patriarchy as gyno-centric patriarchy, as a societal system, not a simple community system or family unit. I find it's best explained with rings, all the males are on the outer ring, and first to everything good and bad, while women on the inner ring, supposedly protected by the men, and eventually infantilized. Though I'm not sure I…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 07:50 AM
1

CHS just got me into it, big fan, I like Paglia though, I remember her being more open minded.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 07:22 AM
5

Well, going to the, "sects," for example. Very few people would ever admit that there are sects, but there's alot of feminists who have great respect for the likes of Andrea Dworkin, Gloria Steinem, and even Valerie Solanas, who were all radical feminists, and very extreme in their views, one was a terrorist. But there's also people who are traditional feminists, aware of men's issues, but focused on women's rights. And the equalists/equity feminists who care about men and women, they're often o…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 07:16 AM
-8

These aren't apologetics, I'm just telling you that it's more complex than, "herdeeder, fuck men." If you're going to gripe about something like this, then you should at least have knowledge beyond one women proclaiming herself a feminist. This is basic schooling.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 06:51 AM
-7

Well they kind of provide a window into the inner working of this ideology as an organization. Despite what the common folk think, there's alot of different sects of feminism, and there are equity and equalist feminists.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 06:43 AM
10

Feminine and Masculine are closely related to gender, but they ultimately describe common behaviors and mannerism.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 06:40 AM
-21

Listen, feminism is alot more complex than that. I would suggest reading Christina Hoff Somers, she goes into quick detail about the radicalization of feminism, and said radicalized majority's anti male sentiment in, -Who Stole Feminism And -The War Against Boys Both on audible.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 06:37 AM
1

So how about we utilize our skills in rhetoric, and at least use the term gyno-centric patriarchy, as to not be perceived as actively hostile to the male gender. Whether you like it or not, the word, "patriarchy," is directly connected to the male gender, and it's usage among feminists is usually negative. No one here is talking about women, except the brigadiers like yourself. The topic was feminism's relationship to men. It isn't about women.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 06:19 AM
1

I would suggest you use the term gyno-centric patriarchy, it better describes the system feminists speak about, without showing active hostility to the male gender. Rhetoric is imperative, especially since you're not preaching to a choir. No one has spoken against women, no one has spoken against women's rights, the topic is feminism's relationship to men. Whether you like it or not, whether you believe it or not, men are increasingly disenfranchised, and feminism has a real shady history of hel…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 06:13 AM
3

I hate to break it to you, but the US had a draft before voting rights were decided on, the constitution didn't come until after a couple wars and, even then, voting rights weren't automatically given to draftees.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:59 AM
1

I'm not so sure about that version of history. Most people today couldn't vote under the earlier laws. Men also had to fight for the right to vote without having to own property, or pay taxes, we had the draft before voting rights were even decided, in the US anyway, maybe revolutionary France too.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:56 AM
1

You might like the femsplainer's podcast, they don't focus on male issues, but it was headed by equalist feminists.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:51 AM
1

It was supposed to be equalist though. The sexism a huge dividing force within feminism in recent history. According to Christina Hoff Somers, many of the equalists weren't ready for the treatment they received from former peers, and either remained silent, or were relegated to conservative media when real debates and harassment campaigns started. Of course, most people supportive of civil rights refuse to even think that a speaker on the conservative side could be supportive of them. On the bri…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:49 AM
2

Only talking about the T doesn't change the gist of my argument, as I said, there are animals who do that. I understand the argument you're making, I'm in line with Blaire White's beliefs on it. But his argument was very much that they are lesser because it never happens in nature, and that is false.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:20 AM
1

He was saying we're worse than animals because they don't have lgbt tendency, but they do.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 02:12 AM
5

Idk about, "more than." The average woke leftist, in my experience, is so far up the Andrea Dworkin rabbit hole that they'd celebrate if every single cis/trans man became a woman tomorrow, some of them act like they'd celebrate the actual death of men.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:55 AM
4

They have quotas to meet for the title IX funding added during the Obama administration over the campus rape crisis.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:47 AM
-2

I have never made friends with these people, methinks this is not an issue with society, but the individuals you have collected around yourself.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:43 AM
-1

Did you give up women, or are saying you can't afford to date?
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:25 AM
4

The animals do have the LGB, and certain animals also have the T, and some are monogendered (though referred to as female due to the eggs).
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:23 AM
-5

That's all the more reason to actively avoid mgtow. How tf do you think the radical feminists got to the positions they're in? None of the issues being complained about happened overnight. The goal is to retake at least half of educational positions in liberal, literary, social, and other arts.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 12:17 AM
-1

It's not hyperbolic to say that MGTOW went beyond the hashtag and into a movement, and that movement has gone beyond simply checking out of the dating scenes, and gone into the beliefs that they should remove themselves from the greater society. The speakers that claim the label range from tiktokers posting self-help shorts, to sexists beyond the level of Andrew Tate. You can't deny that it's at least adjacent to anarchism, simply because of the want to remove themselves from society.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 12:13 AM
-15

I would not give MGTOW any part to that situation, they're way more fanatical than to simply avoid dating. Most of them may as well be anarchists, the freaks.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 11:23 PM
2

That's his specialty.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 09:36 PM
1

How many, what is the percentage?
/r/MensRights20/02/24 09:08 PM
1

So, just to be clear, the only statistic you gave that could possibly support your theory is that of heterosexual marriage and divorce, the homosexual marriage statistic you gave, doesn't help you at all. Neither does the birth vs mortality rate. Even then, it's a crackpot theory at best, we don't know how many husbands are initiating these divorces, or men refusing to wed, compared to the myriad of more likely variables, and the women who initiate divorce and refuse marriage.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 09:03 PM
2

OK, but everything in your post is mainly tied to economic issues. All it says is that fewer people are getting married, and the mortality rate is higher than the birth rate.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 08:29 PM
3

Penile amputation?
/r/MensRights20/02/24 08:23 PM
5

I feel like calling it, "bobbiting," really devalues the actual crime.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 07:37 PM
3

We do have those in the US, just not enough to cover the population it should cover.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 07:34 PM
33

I doubt that qualifies as discrimination, maybe check your contract to see if they broke it. It's also possible they've had issues with said class, and wanted to save you the trouble, or another teacher requested that position over their own.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 07:23 PM
1

And people need to be reporting that, that is unprofessional at best. It's too often, "die FOR an experience like that."
/r/MensRights20/02/24 05:18 PM
2

feministic understanding of the world. Gyno-centric may be the term you're looking for.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 04:47 PM
3

This is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 04:22 PM
1

No, in the past it was a social behavior code that went above gender, and was enforced by king and church.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:58 AM
1

Not really in the past. Chivalry the honor code for nobility is very different from the Chivalry referred to in the gender wars.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 01:00 AM
2

This is a not forum of medical professionals writing scripts and reports. They do not deserve any extra labels beyond the worst examples outside of such documentation. To do so minimizes the damage to the victims and society, they're pedophiles and predators, they mess with kids.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 12:34 AM
-6

This is not a place for psychological care of child perverts. They don't deserve a special label, how they manipulate doesn't change their crimes compared to how other rapists do it, they deserve life in a prison factory.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 12:08 AM
-8

People like that don't deserve the amount of respect it takes to use proper labels. That makes it an excuse.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 11:23 PM
-3

Tomato Tomato, stop making excuses.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 11:00 PM
10

Make a police report, they may request some tests from you as evidence, but it is their job to investigate. If there is no paperwork, then there is no problem, and no magnifying glass. Contact a lawyer. Unblock her, and, do not respond to any messages, do not delete any messages She may incriminate herself.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 09:10 PM
1

The signs are mostly under, "19 years old," repeating regular talking points from RP about women and socially healthy people.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 09:08 PM
148

How would a 15yo get a hotel room in Mumbai?
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:04 PM
-4

Firstly, fuck you. Secondly, idk how long I've been subbed here, but it's been a while, and it's on and off. Thirdly, I've been supportive of rights outside of reddit since before the campus rape crisis was on the debate tables. Fourthly, I have done my research on this specific topic, and know very well what I'm talking about as someone who has interests in publishing and marketing books.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 07:24 PM
-6

Just stereotyping, same reason why some male readers refuse to read the fiction by women.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 07:08 PM
0

You know nothing about me, I'll have you know I've seen the consequences of leaving the foreskin second hand, and first hand, that is why I support a parent's choice in this matter. Consequences, labeled above, which are completely negated by circumcision.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 06:44 PM
1

I didn't say they're the same, you are the only one here who has said those words. I said that they'll be trained, and it'll be fine.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:39 PM
-9

No, that is part of the skill issue, one must know how to speak in business.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:10 PM
12

Yes, but she'd acclaim libertarians, and tell people to vote that way, then complain about capitalism and use socialist talking points.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:08 PM
1

It does depend, I've seen lanky men who couldn't lift a metal bar, and women who could pick up large tires, so yes, it varies.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:06 PM
50

I had a coworker who was a communist libertarian, had brothers and a father, good terms. It seemed a cathartic thing for her decry her side of the gender wars, regularly making gripes and jokes at the cost of men. They reacted as an actual misogynist would when told such behavior is wrong, unprofessional, and inappropriate, with eye-rolling and, "ughs."
/r/MensRights03/02/24 11:19 AM
1

Feminism was held to those standards, and its leaders have a large amount of control over its voice, that's why it's so difficult to get an equalist back into power, they were ousted years ago due to complacency. Much of feminist politics was about damage control and quieting the extremists before the 90s. I expect a political movement or a social movement's leaders to have a degree of control which allows them to prevent the collapse that is seen with nearly every men's rights group, and allows…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 10:45 AM
1

It depends. But we took alot of people in WW2 and Vietnam for which it clearly didn't matter.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 10:24 AM
0

I request that mods add a TLDR text requirement for all posts like this, which have a link to a video or article.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 10:11 AM
3

Post is incorrect in saying that Pizzey started a men's shelter, she was allegedly threatened by other feminists in her support of male victims though. Earl Silverman was the owner of the male shelter (acclaimed by Pizzey) which failed due to ridicule, and a lack of funds.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 09:49 AM
2

People here, myself included, are heavily critical of feminism because, while it has done some good, it also has an absurdly shady history. This is not a place to pretentiously acclaim it. Looking for lies is very common in rape cases as a whole, detectives literally tell you that the judge could see you as a liar if you don't do certain things, they ask what you were wearing..... The issue in question is with the groups that exist to help victims, not just law enforcement. Men are treated in th…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 09:49 AM
-21

Not a gender issue, it's a skill issue. You could report her to HR, but her communication in such a way is not sexist, nor is it an advantage of women, I've been in a position requiring me to do something like that before, it's a skill, you have to be picky about what is said to show professional frustration.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 09:15 AM
1

EDIT - with uncanny timing (relative to this post) he just told me that today at school his class was given an assignment to write about the “pay gap” and consider the opinions of women who are affected by this. Of course if he writes anything other than “women are discriminated against in the workplace” (e.g. if he mentions the adjusted pay gap, or that young women out-earn young men on average, or male workplace deaths are almost 100%) he’ll be crucified by all the girls in the class and his t…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:40 AM
2

Have you ever seen a Dworkinist, or Mackinnonist? One of Gloria Steinem's followers? A Solanist? Radical feminists be very loud and popular, at least when I was looking last.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:32 AM
1

I'm am either too old, or too young to understand this phrase in this context. Or not familiar with the culture.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:27 AM
1

I'm not conflating them, I would prefer equalists, they tend to be open to capitalism, but I would accept equity feminists at this point. That is how bad it was last I checked.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:25 AM
1

TLDR, they shouldn't be participating in tabloid journalism. Or clickbaits.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:22 AM
1

You can't tell me uncircumcised cock doesn't look like a sand-Worm from Dune.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:20 AM
1

TLDR I personally prefer it off, but I wouldn't say this much, idk what the gallbladder does, but it does something.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:17 AM
1

Going Dutch should have been an option for the pay-for-dates question, it's the best answer.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 07:47 AM
1

You know exactly what I'm implying. You can watch the old ones, the mini series was best anyway.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 07:38 AM
0

No, you can still read the manifesto, it has all the common talking points of the hijacked RP movement, all batshit crazy. I literally gave you the quintessential example of feminist terrorist. She is confirmed to have killed at least one person, a famous gay artist. I'm not sure what you're trying to argue here, it is not a hard concept that whining about people, especially to the point of extremism, shouldn't be tolerated in a political movement. It derails the entire point of political positi…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 07:34 AM
-4

Have you ever seen the Sand Worms of Arrakis?
/r/MensRights03/02/24 07:28 AM
1

Andrew Tate is a terrorist sympathizer, the CIA should have dealt with him years before they did, send him to Afghanistan, he'd be stoned and some Emir would cut his dick off before he knew what happened. He's a delusional scam artist who thinks the Taliban is a bunch of Afghani nationals. He's not the reason why feminism is seen as harmful, the frequent and loud Dworkinists and Solanists still leading the voice of the movement is. Equity/equality feminists can't even disagree without being hara…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 07:22 AM
-1

Elliott Rogers is probably the more infamous one. But, yes, the problem is less that there are extremists, and more that the extremists are loud and get caught up by the media, hence why they must be shouted down, and thrown under the bus, for the greater good. Many people use the case of Valerie Solanas, and Scum Manifesto, against feminism, myself included. That's the real big case for this against them.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 06:57 AM
-9

https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/circumcision/about/pac-20393550Easier hygiene. Circumcision makes it simpler to wash the penis. However, boys with uncircumcised penises can be taught to wash regularly beneath the foreskin. Decreased risk of urinary tract infections. The risk of urinary tract infections in males is low, but these infections are more common in uncircumcised males. Severe infections early in life can lead to kidney problems later. Decreased risk of sexually transmitted …
/r/MensRights03/02/24 06:37 AM
2

They'll be trained, it'll be fine.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 06:20 AM
5

That's not how it works, they'd either register him in the event of a draft, or ticket/jail him.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 06:19 AM
1

For US people, but every country has something like this. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript US Constitution Article 1 Section. 8. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; To borrow Money on the credit of the United States; To regulate Commerce with f…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 06:15 AM
1

I understand your frustration, but there are dozens of manifestos in which a murderer has tied these things to their crimes. Feminism only has a handful of those, so, yes, we need to heavily regulate the conversations within these movements, or we'll keep losing them to pill people, who do no Activism or lobbying whatsoever.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 06:07 AM
-11

Uncircumcised penises can cause health issues on their own, this is a far more nuanced issue.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:54 AM
3

As a bi dude, this is probably just denial that people are into both. I don't know a single bisexual person who doesn't have an anecdote in which a gay person just assumed they're straight, or a straight person just assumed they're gay. Or a gay person just assumed they're gay.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:51 AM
2

I don't even have 1 person I'd want to hang out with twice a week, but I'm a loner. https://youtube.com/watch?v=OrAfhUEcliA&si=Hpmlb7I9t0E_XNio
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:41 AM
2

They don't care, it's just taxable income to them.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:20 AM
10

The Duluth Model alone is arguably a crime against humanity, considering how close it is to brainwashing, and how an innocent may be suscepted to it.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:19 AM
5

Pill people are the worst, those miserable FDS members included. Unfortunately most groups that strive for men's rights quickly fall for the same issues that plague feminist groups, complaining about the other. This sub is one of the few places I've seen continuously policing such things, and that is imperative to preventing any men's rights group from going the way rp went, it wasn't always whiny shut-ins.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 04:52 AM
1

I would suggest voicing them yourself, AI is great and fun in art and chat, but boring as fuck when used for text-to-speech.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 04:44 AM
6

In a way, boys were being left behind due to certain groups, this started in the 80s/90s. But parents and extended family, and community are also to blame, often pushing boys to trades instead of education, especially in the US, that's how bad the student debt issue is, so it's not all due to society.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 04:41 AM
1

OP's comment partially blamed, "ultra-conservatives." The opening comment in the following thread explicitly brought in, "LGBTQ and liberal factions."
/r/MensRights31/08/23 01:55 AM
-9

OP in the comments- "it's conservatives" Another commenter- "it's liberals" You're both ignoring the fact that men aren't encouraged to be teachers, and neither of you are encouraging it.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 03:15 PM
4

This may be too soon, but I hope Jordan Peele gets this story, he'd be perfect for that movie. But fr, wtf, I don't even know what to say, is 19 not an adult in India?
/r/MensRights29/08/23 06:55 AM
10

I suggest using the same questions for both, ask men and women if their able to walk comfortably at night. I have a theory that those answers differ less on genitalia, and more on whether one leans masculine or feminine. There are many organizations trying to help women secure a place in society, Keep in mind when creating these questions that a great many men, maybe even a majority, don't have a place in society, or don't feel that society even wants them.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 03:41 AM
6

She's alright, hate that the video frames it as if she's victim blaming. She's not, she understands that men take risks just as women do, she was in the fights specifically to end things like dorm curfews so that women could go out and take those risks.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 03:30 AM
1

Oh, didn't know, good for him.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 03:21 PM
1

He was never with Shapiro, Shapiro just got famous for talking about the same things at the same times. If he was with Shapiro he'd have joined the Daily Wire by now.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 10:55 AM
1

Dr Farrell has credentials specifically to help, we can't all be on damage control, they're going to have to listen or we just need to leave them behind. I'm sorry, I know that's cold, but at this rate we're going to be spending more than a few generations trying to help them, when most of them need the expertise of people like Dr Ruth. All while boys are falling through in the STEM and Humanities. We can't change things without power, and for that MRAs need to take teaching positions in college…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 07:12 AM
5

No No Varies Not really Not Anymore Not Anymore
/r/MensRights28/08/23 04:05 AM
8

There's several factors, some depend on the state, NY, for example, limits exclusive clubs to about 100-400 members, and even if that's met people would probably still report it. I doubt male spaces would qualify exemptions either. I said to someone else that it's not just men, https://www.aclu.org/news/womens-rights/legal-questions-raised-women-only-workspace But simply calling a club private doesn’t make it so. The Wing is reported to have more than 2,000 members, raising questions about wheth…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 03:53 AM
18

https://stateimpact.npr.org/florida/2014/09/29/why-the-aclu-is-challenging-single-gender-classes-in-florida-schools/ https://www.aclu.org/documents/sex-segregated-schools-separate-and-unequal#:~:text=The%20ACLU%20Women's%20Rights%20Project,boys%20receive%20equal%20educational%20opportunities. https://wp.api.aclu.org/press-releases/court-rules-favor-woman-who-was-denied-membership-all-male-club This one is probably the most common, where the government sets restrictions on single-gender private g…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 03:44 AM
15

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, grindr wasn't made with lesbians in mind.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 03:23 AM
2

Do you speak out against man-hating feminists? Or the Dworkinists and Solanists? Last I checked all they did was hate on men under the guise of feminism, and they became protected by the intersectional feminists in the late 80s or 90s.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 02:01 AM
1

They did, they were silenced until the 70s, because between the late 60s and 80s they were taking jobs in education in order to cause the indoctrination into radicalism we still see today in many places.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 01:56 AM
0

I think you and I disagree politically according to your other comments, but I'm glad we agree that relationship issues and the MRM shouldn't mix again, ever again.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 01:54 AM
-1

The immediate goal is the policing of pill people, they are the direct cause of failed MRMs over the last century. We should focus on guiding these men to therapists, and dating/sex experts who specialize in the individual goals of these men. Sue Johanson Dr. Ruth Westheimer Dr. John Gottman Hookup specialists, or at least the sub for online dating and profile advice. We also should guide them away from their misogynistic views, they complain about loneliness, then show contempt for the people t…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 01:52 AM
53

There's a lot of backlash that people would get, and Can we come together as men and create more spaces exclusively for men to not only talk but help each other grow and develop. Advice on anything, physical training, embracing/increasing masculinity, male bonding, friendships, a place for gay men to find eachother for more than a hookup hopefully, research, networking, career opportunities, aid and whatever else we men can do for eachother. Men will have to come together, buy property, construc…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 01:37 AM
18

Yes, it is. There's so many laws discriminating and disadvantaging against men and boys, and so little aid available to them (especially those who are victims of any sort of abuse or violence when committed by female aggressors, a subject still very taboo in society) and it's become virtually legal to insult and degrade men. With things like the Gillette ad and such. Misandry is definitely widespread and enforced, and is never taken seriously. You have literally described the things which made r…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 11:17 PM
0

Of course the CIA did it, but it was Pakistan's jihaddists that won, there were a ton of groups. Tate believes they were all Afghani nationals who were just fighting western democracy, but they were fighting a Russian backed government, each other, then native Afghan tribes before the first invasion of the US. He uses his influence to create a false history of what actually happened.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 09:22 PM
3

International Men's Day is in November, and I'm pretty sure it's also multiple other holidays.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 08:08 PM
6

Stop sensationalizing, corporate greed is genderless, they shared the day with dogs, and the date is probably used for at least 3 other things.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 08:06 PM
-3

Good, I'm just saying it happens, and for many women it's a red flag if it's not spotless, that flophouse was just a particularly bad scenario I experienced, though I imagine a woman would run like hell if she walked into what I walked into.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 07:59 PM
2

That's an incorrect statistic, 21% of ill women are divorced, and 3% of men are. It's talking about the people getting divorced. It's an average of 11.6% divorced without gender taken into account, not 20% of men divorcing and 3% of women divorcing. You read it as 20% of the entire male population will divorce a dying spouse, which is false. It also didn't take into account any reasons other than, "men bad at care." No financial issues, social issues, relationship issues before the onset of illn…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:32 PM
2

https://homecaregenerations.com/men-take-better-care-of-their-sick-spouses-than-previously-thought/#:~:text=An%20Increase%20in%20Caregiving&text=Researchers%20found%20that%20that%3A,between%20male%20and%20female%20caregivers. It's important to note that the statistics still say terminally ill women are left more than male counterparts, but the overall numbers are still very low, and not a cause for concern, at 21% of sick women being divorced vs 3% of sick men. There's further factors than gende…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:22 PM
4

Tbf, when your naysayers become a licensing board in Canada, and you're credentials are threatened because you're speaking against a government which is mandating treatments that may not be best for every patient, you probably should protest a bit. That being said, those pill people just took some clips and ran with them, he's actively said that their worldview is wrong.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:11 PM
5

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/ Idk what's worse, that a child is left with child predators or that a rape victim is forced to pay for that predator's lifestyles.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:01 PM
3

No, they'll investigate, they're ruled by the company first, and their job is to prevent lawsuits.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 03:30 PM
-1

Yet if Andrew Tate was a woman he would be applauded for how hard she worked to get those cars If he was woman, she'd be openly laughed at, and still put on an FBI watch list. He's not just blunt, he sees half the human population as slaves, servants, and objects, his arrest in Romania wasn't even the first time he got in trouble for human trafficking. He's also a terrorist sympathizer who actively ignores generations of geopolitics to support the Taliban as if they're simply rebels fighting the…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 03:16 PM
-2

Tate's also a terrorist sympathizer, but all these boys just watch the shorts that don't show that.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 03:06 PM
-10

He said it a sexist way to make you seem like the victim. But if she said you two are in different places, there may very well have been issues in the home. Was it clean? No stains on the floor/walls/furniture? Dishes cleaned, did you clean as you cooked? Dishes properly stored? Did you pre-cook, or make your guest wait? Was the bathroom clean, fresh towels, toiletries in cabinets and closets? Does your mother/grandmother have to clean up everytime they visit? Were there cobwebs? Was it well fur…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:08 PM
7

That's what dating is for, just because you had a decent time, doesn't mean they feel the wish to continue. The proper handling of this is to spend a day or two in grief, say, "okay," and move on. Women don't just go out to a man's apartment these days, she wasn't pulling your leg. She probably ended it for the exact reason she gave, or because the chemistry wasn't there for you two.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 01:53 PM
1

Whether that's the case or not, OP was under false assumptions, and fertility is greatest in one's 20s for humans, not one's teens.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:07 AM
1

-nods head up, "you look decent."
/r/MensRights26/08/23 10:46 PM
0

That biological thing has been changing, it's up to mid 20s now. You can see the changes in law with evolution, under 18 hasn't been considered fertile in 100 years. Outliers have also been increasing on the other end, where people are increasingly living longer.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 08:18 PM
0

I'd like to know what this movement says of the other men, who often wish to switch places with such victims, and how prevalent that sentiment is. It's obviously a very problematic thing for men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 08:15 PM
0

Believe it or not, equal partnerships are real, and you won't find one thinking that the only goal is sex.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 08:06 PM
1

The communist governments we've seen so far have taken the means of production by stealing from the, "bourgeoisie," and keeping it for themselves, while arresting any of the, "proletariat," who disagree, while claiming to be all for those people. They, in practice, make everyone equal in misery, and rarely if ever deliver on the promise to provide.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 07:57 PM
3

Do not speak about this within the workplace, or to management, record incidents and report it straight to HR, and file with the appropriate oversight organization. Follow workplace policies. https://www.findlaw.com/employment/legal-help-and-resources/documents-to-show-your-attorney-discrimination-harassment.html#:~:text=The%20diary%20entry%20could%20include,names%20of%20any%20witnesses%20present.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 07:47 PM
1

No risks, no rewards, that's what dating is for, seeing if you can trust, live, etc, with that person.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 07:43 PM
3

I was going to say that this used to be called white knighting.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 07:29 PM
0

It's still barely considered intercourse today, they just had more rigid views, most people still thought rape was mainly sexual in nature as well, and not something criminals use as a power play. I think it was still considered SA, but it wasn't equated to anal or vaginal rape.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:03 PM
3

Fiamengo and Christina Hoff Somers were 2nd wave equity/equality feminists who were highly critical of increasingly extremist views coming out of the intersectional majority from the 90s to 2010s. The only real issue with them is that they were part of a good half of the population questioning whether oral rape is full rape, though that was in the 80s and early 90s, so they changed their views on that since, and it was a common question of the time. Somers wrote -Who Stole Feminism- and -The War…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 05:10 PM
9

Who Stole Feminism was interesting. Regular history textbooks Haven't read it, but, Feminisms: A Global History, is probably alot less critical about the modern intersectional feminism and its communist/fascist roots. You probably should ask this on askreddit, or a feminist sub, intersectionalists aren't as intersectional on the internet.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 02:28 PM
12

Adds up to me, most victims I've met have, at least once, been a vegan and/or anti-natalist.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:39 AM
55

This shouldn't have happened, someone should have at least pointed you to CPS. As someone else said, contact a lawyer and report this. As for helping other victims, one thing ive noticed is that female predators spend alot of time grooming, they're very insideous, and many male victims don't see what happens to them as abuse, until it effects their lives much later, most female predators I've heard of aren't so violent as your mother, so it's far less obvious to the victim because they're rarely…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:10 AM
1

Most mentally disabled people still contribute to society as well. Do you think they're all stuffed into mental wards?
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:40 AM
1

Sounds like you may need to change something in your hygiene lifestyle, I'm not sure what health professional you'd need to discuss that with, but maybe try different soaps, antiperspirants, and drying off better, wearing light and looser clothes, washing linens and clothes more often, and tell your doctor you're having a history with this infection. https://www.healthline.com/health/skin/cutaneous-candidiasis
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:36 AM
1

Go see a urologist, they are the penis specialists, if you went to see a male family or general doctor, he'd probably still give you the cream. Keep taking the cream, your gonna have to tough it out, you have an infection, the cream is generally for minor infections, and if you don't take it, then you really won't like the treatments for complications, for example, you may become incapable of pulling your foreskin back, and many doctors advise circumcision at that point. So make sure you stay cl…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:25 AM
1

That's why you date, it is for marriage, it is not simply to date or fuck. It's to make sure you're not ruining your life by tying yourself to a crazy person.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:10 AM
3

.... people with down syndrome regularly contribute to society, most disabled people do.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:07 AM
8

Thank you, I've been looking for these for a while, I've only had anecdotal evidence for that theory for years.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 11:32 PM
6

I agree that this sub should focus on men's issues, but it's important to note that feminism made itself the enemy, MRA's did not. It is leaders in the feminist lobbies who seem to see MR as the enemy, and an evil rival for resources. Anita Sarkisian and Gamergate is a recent example of how quickly feminism makes enemies in attempts to secure resources that they don't need. A more glaring example from the 90s and early 2000s is the example that we're still trying to fix today. The girl's educati…
/r/MensRights25/08/23 10:46 PM
4

This is why workplace policies exist, treating coworkers like they're homies almost always ends this way.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 05:04 AM
5

I wouldn't get it, but hopefully it works better than the last try.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 04:59 AM
0

That is called depression
/r/MensRights22/04/23 04:58 AM
1

I hope he's just the kind of kid who'd defend the relationship between Delores and Humbert, and not the kind of adult who defends the relationship between them.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 03:26 AM
7

Men have been more likely to help in my experience
/r/MensRights22/04/23 03:01 AM
12

This has been a complaint in university for decades. We need to encourage sane and normal people to retake the overrun departments.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 02:51 AM
1

How old are you?
/r/MensRights22/04/23 02:25 AM
2

She was married to an adult. Therefore, the attraction to the 15 year old was not exclusive. Even if you go with the often used "primary attraction" definition (which I reject) its unproven between the fresh sex partner and the old one. If I fuck a straight married man on grindr, does that change the fact he is a cheater, and probably bisexual? Next, as she said herself, she has been a teacher for a long time, but this is the first time she was attracted to a teen. It sure seems its the first ti…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:57 AM
-1

The original person I was talking to insisted that pedophile was not the correct word, hebephile is, you're saying it's not, but, fact is, she fucked a 15 year old boy, that is young adolescence, ergo she's a hebephilic pervert.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:26 AM
0

First off, what happened on dateline wasn't entrapment, simply setting a trap is not entrapment. Entrapment is when the police cause a civilian to do something they wouldn't have normally done. In the dateline cases there were grown adults who actively targeted kids, they were lurking on online forums and chatrooms, and explicitly looking for illegal activities, there were tons of adults there who weren't, not to mention actual kids who could have become the victim of a pervert. Idk why you're s…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:11 AM
1

Mental deficiency is not a defense for breaking the law.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:39 AM
-2

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and swims like a duck, it's likely a duck.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:37 AM
1

Ok so you're not just a groomer, you're a sexist groomer, do you really think it's because they're just retarded?
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:54 PM
-1

Ffs, hebephilia is just as bad, tf is wrong with you, you realize that you're defending a pervert right?
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:37 PM
1

They were perverts who, at best, wanted to groom kids to get with them upon adulthood, but most wanted to sleep with people who were underage. They deserve nearly every punishment before death.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:34 PM
3

They do attack the idea, you can't even separate boys and girls in a classroom without a call from the ACLU.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:08 PM
4

That's even more idiotic, you're just going to allow feminists to win they'll take all your jobs, and control the flow of information and research. When the military can't make quotas they turn to the draft, when the draft fails they turn to slavery, there's always something or someone there willing to force you to do something.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:02 PM
4

You could try a men's college, there's at least one on the east coast.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 10:41 PM
2

That's stupid, we know for certain the strategy I mentioned works because it's exactly what the feminists did. They shut their mouths, hid their beliefs, and took influential positions in the arts and languages, and they're still going for the sciences.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 10:38 PM
5

It's part of an organized effort to continually manufacture crisis and blame it all on men, ever since Gloria Steinem lied to the world about hundreds of thousands of women dying from anorexia, the movement just decided to make shit up and blame men. Another example is the girls education crisis, they used their own biased researchers, and manufactured a crisis, a government study in 2000s was done to see if their claims were true, it found they weren't and that boys had been behind since the la…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 10:01 PM
0

It doesn't belong here at all, the motherfucker had kids write their own obituaries. I know he was focusing on the idea that he was silenced by a female while teaching them about policy, but he was fear mongering and brainwashing by adding a requirement to write one's own obituary. We also don't know what he actually told students when telling them what to do in the event that they're in the restroom during an intruder event. This is not about men's issues.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 09:43 PM
3

Don't get out, we need to encourage him and other sane people to take these positions from the radicals.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 09:25 PM
7

Report every event to human resources. Record if allowed.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 09:20 PM
1

This doesn't belong here, it isn't sex based, he had kids write their own obituaries in relation to gun policies, that's way over the line.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 09:12 PM
17

Virginia doesn't have anything to do with it, this is a federal judge fighting CPS and family court for custody, I doubt it will be a tough fight.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 09:11 PM
0

Chris Hanson needs a new show.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 09:07 PM
0

Well that's intended to be more difficult, generally if you don't have visual evidence of an assailant in the act, or the police don't see it themselves, or there are clear signs of damage, it's not going to get prosecuted, only the government in many states of the US can charge another civilian criminally, if no local lawyers will take your case, you may not have a choice but to go out of town for a lawyer.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:10 PM
1

I’m not really doomsaying so much as looking realistically at the situation, contacting politicians or trying to advocate for police reform by befriending the sheriff is absurd in my case. How do you think politics is done?
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:59 PM
2

Maybe don't go to the police telling them, "I got kicked in the nuts!" No one's going to take it seriously if you put it that way, at least be professional. You get an out of town lawyer because they are less likely to work with those police every week. Re: politicians, befriending the boys in blue, etc. that would only serve to be laughed at. Nobody cares. It’s a joke to them because they see more seriously dark shit on the daily, and even if they didn’t, they would still find it just hilarious…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:11 PM
2

It is not. In cases of sexual intercourse feminists want it to be considered rape, but that's not how the world works.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:42 PM
1

It shocks me that people don't know it already, it is an explicit right in US, and if you don't exercise it you'll sabotage your case.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 06:59 AM
1

Child support is taxed, and the IRS wants your money regardless of your living situation.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 06:56 AM
2

Now I ain't sayin she a gold digger, but....
/r/MensRights21/04/23 06:54 AM
1

I have a preference favoring Blaire White's views.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 06:52 AM
0

It really wasn't how you described it either though, feminism was always about women's rights, and they didn't hide it until today's time. But it was not all sexist, until the 60s much was debated in academic areas of what the movement should be, as we see with men's rights, it just happened that the radicals stayed silent, and found positions in Academia where they could influence future feminist to their cause. This is documented well in, "Who Stole Feminism," by Christina Hoff Somers. The les…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 06:48 AM
1

Christina Hoff Somers is quite the expert on this question, her books heavily criticized the radicalization and behavior that feminism came to fully embody by the 70s.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 06:40 AM
29

I'd much rather be female, the social ease alone is privilege enough, not to mention the extra scholarships, more respect, etc.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 05:58 AM
1

They are normal, states are independent enough to decide these things, and it's fairly standard across the board. The pushback is about getting women the same harsh sentences for the same crimes, while relaxing other laws such as the ones around Marijuana to lower prison population.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 05:30 AM
2

We know what happens, it usually involves gangs, personal finances, and/or the fact that we men do indeed do stupid risky shit, and pay a great cost sometimes. The latter 2 likely exacerbated by the lack of social/religious knowledge/history of indigenous cultures.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 05:22 AM
1

Have you ever been shopping with a woman?
/r/MensRights21/04/23 05:16 AM
2

Leave that wench, I know no one who tells people to stay. Go board up with a friend, get a restraining/protective order, and get a lawyer. Next time a woman has trapped you, and is hitting you, treat her like a puppy, just keep walking and wave your hands as if directing it elsewhere, tell it to move calmly but firmly, make a high pitched whelp if it strikes you to show that it's causing pain (ideally on video for the court), and get tf out, ideally get out the moment you think it'll start somet…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 05:07 AM
3

Why would you want to help? She didn't even ask you for help. Maybe my heart's colder than yours, but it sounds like she was working through it naturally.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:59 AM
77

That would not need a criminal attorney, you would need someone specialized for civil suits as you're suing for medical bills and emotional damages, possibly lost wages or something similar, they may also be interested in suing the police, pick an out-of-town lawyer for that though. It may also be wise to seek a higher police office such as the state police. I hope your gf is moved out, this is a men's issues sub, but bad roommates are no joke, and she lives with your assailant. After lawsuits, …
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:32 AM
8

Yes, it is legal to influence people, you also should have cleaned your room. You may be allowed to report the photo to Facebook per Facebook policy, but you should politely communicate to the poster that you would like it taken down.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:16 AM
0

The biggest problem is the same problem that red pill had, no self policing to a point where a movement is overrun with people sharing bad romance advice, and bitching about women, it became nothing more than the male version of female dating strategy, and that lack of policing allowed violent extremists to tie themselves to men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 06:27 PM
49

Maybe he likes her, do not gossip at work, workplace policies exist for a reason.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 04:47 PM
-7

I think it's shitty because pill people advertise preying on broken people in order to create a slave.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 04:01 PM
-13

I read it, pill people are categorized by my description. If the author didn't want to be associated with that, then they should have picked a better title.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 06:27 AM
-20

This is not a sub for pill people, we should not tolerate shitty dating advice, and sexist bitching.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 04:32 AM
0

Is that modern Mongol or medieval Mongol?
/r/MensRights13/04/23 03:47 AM
0

Meh
/r/MensRights13/04/23 03:45 AM
2

The problem is the brown coat, and red guard wannabes attacking free speech with threats such as the recent VCU protest.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 03:20 AM
-47

Considering it's about the business of house-flippng and real-estate, I don't this is the sexist got-cha you think it is.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 03:10 AM
3

Tech, and entering the workforce had little to do with the divorce rate imo, considering the prevalence of alimony to this date. It just happened to coincide with everything that did.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 03:07 AM
1

Well WW3 will change it or end it.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:47 AM
3

No statutes of limitation for sexual harassment? Not for a complaint to HR.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:36 AM
4

You need a lawyer, not a helpline
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:19 AM
5

I meant the crimes committed at your first workplace, and harassment in the other.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:16 AM
3

Only if you're far left, the guy's moderate even by Canadian standards.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:12 AM
3

He doesn't embrace the label, Olivia wilde was highly criticized for treating him like that. I'm sure reactions to Peterson here are based more in political leanings than activism, he's moderate, maybe moderate-right for Canada, and this sub is diverse on that front.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:11 AM
12

Exactly, people need to stop making up words, there are actual incels, but very few of the people called incels are actual incels, the joke isn't funny anymore.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:03 AM
3

You could still report them.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 01:57 AM
1

Ai isn't anti anything, whomever said so put in a prompt to make it so.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 06:57 PM
2

I tell everyone, men, women, everyone. Fool you once, shame on them, twice, shame on them, thrice, come on now it's turning into a pattern.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:06 PM
1

I like some, mrballen has a good voice for it, but I prefer the paranormal stories.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:03 PM
1

78 is too little, someone must have given her a deal.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 06:58 PM
0

That's ridiculous, you can't expect people to remember every verse in such a book.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 03:11 AM
1

Have you asked your lawyer at what point you can take legal action?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 06:39 PM
1

Special interests groups such as charity organizations are the only ones that will help, the government will not pay for civil suits, or other lawyers, they will only pay for a lawyer if they're filing the lawsuit, or it's a case involving an arrestable crime. Idk what you're expecting.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 06:07 PM
8

Most issues with men's rights are a direct result of 3rd wave feminism and the extremists who founded the new doctrine. It's important to know why we're in these situations in order to combat the resistance that comes whenever there's a push for pro-male programs. How are you going to react when you're trying to add a vocational program for struggling boys, and the NWLC files a suit citing their own biased study as common knowledge, and then files a complaint with the ACLU if your research, in f…
/r/MensRights28/03/23 05:34 PM
3

That's not only untrue, but it's also lame.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 05:30 PM
3

You need a lawyer, do not contact her, allow the court to do so. Remain professional at all times, keep all her messages, record any calls from her do not respond on the calls, and do not contact her, even to tell/ask her about your daughter, do everything through court. Depending on the evidence from her contacting you, you may even be able to countersue, but you cannot respond to her, or contact her at all. Seek a restraining order from the police yourself citing the messages and calls, it is …
/r/MensRights28/03/23 04:27 PM
21

He's right, Christina Hoff Somers has said it since the 90s. She's hardly the only person to do research on it either. You take away and prevent programs for boys, catered to the masculine identity, then wonder why they increasingly turn to people like Andrew Tate.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 04:17 PM
1

I'm like 90% sure that's not a prophecy, but Isaiah lamenting the state his country was in at that moment. Even if it were, all the Isaiaic prophecies were supposed to be done by the new testament.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 06:18 AM
2

That's what modern feminism does, they'll lie, misrepresent data, sometimes they'll just make shit up. They practically caused the anorexia epidemic just because they wanted something to blame men on, that may have been Gloria Steinem specifically though.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 06:00 AM
1

That's not what I've read, in any version.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 05:56 AM
0

Weren't they a trans woman?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 05:53 AM
6

I'm downvoting you cause you are being an asshole, and you were only right about 1 thing, and it was negligible to the conversation.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 05:16 AM
6

I'm serious about everything I argue about. You are right, there is one male, and it does say 92% female. That doesn't change the attitude.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 03:34 AM
15

Minus any guy, while bragging that there is no guy. The article specifically stated that members of the Biden administration said anyone complaining about "racial quotas" is, "ultra maga." Racial quotas are policies directly resulting from affirmative actions. In this case there is implications that saying such bragging may be sexism, comes from prejudice.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 03:28 AM
1

Idk, I think the last push was 2014, but there may be something newer. I've read some articles supporting it from 2018-2019.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 02:00 AM
7

What is the prompt?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:47 AM
0

Why?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:43 AM
1

So you can retire then? Live a happy life in a cottage with a garden?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:40 AM
3

What do you really want?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:28 AM
16

I'm against affirmative actions, so I must wear a MAGA hat? Tbh the makeup of the class does not concern me as much as the size. I know this is likely a larger class, but they can probably fit more in, male or female, given there's a doctor shortage in multiple specialties, including surgical specialties.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 12:13 AM
2

But do they get this particular benefit?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 12:08 AM
3

Without reason
/r/MensRights28/03/23 12:05 AM
11

Unless the government comes at you with tanks (which is why we have rights to arms) there is no excuse for such terrorist attacks, even then children are supposed to be off limits. This person came from a population which is increasingly radicalized by the left telling people they're owed things society doesn't owe anyone.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 11:48 PM
6

It highlights the fact that the current, and last 2-3 generations do indeed need ethics in school. Since the 50s or 60s teaching morality was practically banned, or highly limited. Since then schools have gotten increasingly violent, bullying, and destruction of property continues to increase. After columbine there was some interest in bringing ethics back, but fears over facist propaganda won, and the most schools ever did was require the students to recite their code of conduct after the pledg…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 11:41 PM
5

I like to argue, why else would I be on reddit?
/r/MensRights27/03/23 10:47 PM
7

I don't think you understand how arguments and debates work.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 10:06 PM
1

It won't, it's goal is to cause internal wars between populations so they vote certain ways, it will never, and has never fixed anything. It is, by its nature, prejudice.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 09:29 PM
1

In Sweden, for example, We can say with some certainty that a low crime rate was indeed correlated more to the homogeneous population. Since they've accepted refugees over the years crime has steadily increased, and is currently at an all time high.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 09:25 PM
-11

This is not a dating advice sub. In general, if he can get lap dances, she can too. This is more likely a communication issue between two individual adults.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 09:18 PM
19

Murder is the most serious abuse, wtf is wrong with you. We were talking about infanticide. The estimated crime rate of rape committed by women very close to that of men. How about you treat the crime, not the gender, they all do these things for the same reasons, stop being sexist.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 08:45 PM
4

I think this is more conservative vs progressive argument on this point. There's many progressives here who see language as part of a problem, and everywhere really.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 08:30 PM
18

That just means mothers need to be watched more by the government, and punished more harshly than they are, no more settlements, no more dropping the worst charges, no more getting out for good behavior, put Casey Anthony back in prison, and every other woman like her. We do this because of bias promoted by feminists. We treat all men as the 5-10% who are criminals. We only treat female criminals as criminals, even then, we treat them lightly, often as victims of circumstances.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 08:00 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights27/03/23 07:38 PM
-1

BLM literally burnt towns, at least Jan 6 went after guilty people. The Republicans were just as outraged for the male victims, and just as critical of the women. You're demonizing Republicans without knowing what was actually said and done, they were very supportive of the victims BLM protested over, so no, they are not anti-male, but BLM got violent, supports questionable policies to them, and is a highly corrupt group set on keeping any funds for profit while people claim it's just a hashtag …
/r/MensRights27/03/23 07:26 PM
0

You're literally citing gossip.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 07:12 PM
1

The fact that it depends on gender at all should be discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 11:55 PM
2

You do the opposite of what feminazi spaces like the sub you stated does. Shunning, isolating, and shaming is the way of toxic femininity. You allow free speech, within the scope that this subredditt covers, and you properly debate your case as to why their beliefs are incorrect.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 06:32 PM
6

You're clearly being hostile, you have been accusatory to the OP themself since your first comment.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 05:14 PM
1

It is sexist to say that men are not capable of nurturing children as good mothers do, yes. It would be sexist to say that women are incapable of performing adequate construction work because men are stronger than women.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 04:57 PM
8

Your hostility isn't going to help your case, I'm sure you've seen such anti male sentiment on common feminist subs, and even polite disagreement gets shamed in many of those, if not outright banned. You can't deny that most of feminism has serious issues on the free speech and debate fronts, it's riddled with toxic femininity including shaming other women for free choices.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 04:45 PM
0

It may just be the fact that the democratic party insist on supporting lobbys aiming for removing the concept of sex, gender, and restroom segregation. Women often have reason to fear men, we should encourage non sexist rhetoric, rhetoric that democrats regularly use against the male sex. I've not seen any Republicans promoting the idea that men are naturally dangerous.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 04:29 PM
1

Then you are sexist, and that is false. Women abuse, even murder their kids just as much as men, they only get off because of bias in favor of girls. Ffs, Casey Anthony got a documentary that overly favors her side of the story, she killed her kid, and she gets a damn series, she should still be in prison. If you picked men who won't care for kids, that's an issue with you.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 04:19 PM
-1

There are fringe groups, fringe even to radical feminists, who insist that it's wrong for women to conform to any feminine behavior, they've been around for a couple generations now. I'm assuming that is what the post refers to.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 04:07 PM
11

Several extremist lobbyists have been shaming other women for making free choices to be feminine since the 60s. That's how toxic femininity works, shaming people into silence, isolation, conformity, etc.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 04:01 PM
25

Good, now Disney needs to hire him so we can actually get a good star wars project.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:55 PM
-1

The majority of Republicans very much advocate 2/3 of those. Most aren't free market capitalists. The democratic party is only against the draft, and they're only half heartedly against that. They don't care about men, they don't care about anything except ACLU statistics regarding populations. For example, they, as a party, have always supported the ACLU acting against single sex classes in public schools, despite research supporting the belief that it's highly beneficial in preventing sexism, …
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:39 PM
1

Don’t have sex with a woman until you know you can trust her with your dog and kids, dude you really don’t know women at all do you, I understand a man shares a little of the responsibility here, but women profit from a man’s downfall and a lot of these guys still chase their primitive needs and aren’t as conscious as we are. Man, im saying the advice old people have been saying forever. If dumb men, and dumb women continue to choose a risqué life, they have to deal with the consequences.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:09 PM
2

Primary elections are in-party elections. Said chosen candidates still have to meet certain goals including petition requirements in localities for state candidates, and petition requirements in all states for presidential candidates in order to get on the ballot. Not sure about others, but presidential candidates also have to have enough possible party representation in the future senate/congress to be allowed in the big debates. Said goals are made increasingly harder every time a third party …
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:25 AM
2

The problem is that the big teams move the goal post every time a third team gets close to it.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:15 AM
1

Sue her , publicly post the court video. Use it in school presentations. Shopkeepers not letting you in, use that to sue her again
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:00 AM
2

They're mostly old women, that may actually be in our favor for now. Most politicians you'd be talking about are Republicans, which is fine with me, but many here seem on the other side of politics, quite a few don't seem to be moderate either. I think most men care more about their jobs and rest, I for one am not exempt from work even during presidential elections. I've never tried the mail in vote, not sure if my locality even offers it for local elections. You can still email, mail, or call y…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 08:47 AM
-8

I hope it was just a gender studies class. 👀 social psychology Oh, you know alot of southern schools might have less biased programs. Or for profit schools. Or religious schools. Hopefully That being said, you're usually allowed to debate during college lectures, most of the actual learning in my experience was from reading the textbooks.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 08:34 AM
2

I'm glad she's back, Australia put a gag order on her. I think alot of people thought she left the media after someone threw piss on her. Her blaire White interview was interesting, first time I saw her in years.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 08:33 AM
-4

50/50 access, which means no maintenance for the ex wife. That depends on the judge, and state/local laws.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 08:27 AM
-5

Oof
/r/MensRights25/03/23 08:24 AM
1

Idk many women who want to emulate the Kardashians, most teenagers understand that they are exaggerating and that it's at least partially scripted. Dating was never intended to be solely fun, though it should also be fun, the entire concept exists to weed out abusers, gold diggers, anyone who is generally incompatible, etc. I'll tell you what I tell women, fool you once, shame on them, fool you twice, shame on them, fool you thrice, well maybe we should look at your preferences, because now it's…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 08:18 AM
-6

Google it, there should be at least one within an hour of you, unless you actually live in the middle of nowhere.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 07:29 AM
1

I always question such statements as the research usually comes from biased sources, often falsifying statistics, and using misleading language. In the past this has caused great harm, feminist Gloria Steinem, for example, pretty much caused the anorexia epidemic when she falsified statistics about the disease and the media ran with it. But, while i dont have kids, I understand the fear that your child may become a criminal. I hope that parents no longer take their sons to gender studies reform …
/r/MensRights25/03/23 06:41 AM
1

I suggest the book -The War Against Boys- by Christina Hoff Somers the newest edition. It goes over several resistances to programs catered to boys, particularly from extremist feminist lobby groups. As well as going over what happened in relation to feminism to cause the lagging of boys. She may mention other issues, but she tends to focus on feminism, and this book can potentially be seen as a sequel to -who stole feminism- It's important to note that both boys and girls, or others, can thrive…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 04:19 AM
1

In the cases of this fad, it was always best, even before the fad, to notify staff. Like that one lady all the conservatives made fun of, she was acting crazy, that guy should of notified the staff that she's threatening, because she was, you can't just put headphones on and expect people to ignore your odd activity and questionable language.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:10 AM
4

That's very naive.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:06 AM
-10

There's always been Male only gyms.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:04 AM
1

It was probably something with colleges, these issues stayed there until like 2020.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:02 AM
3

I dislike the liberal use of the term power.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:54 AM
3

Sounds like you're mostly having trouble with lawyers. I'd suggest seeking a local help group, and hoping this new lawyer is a good fit. Sounds like you're going to need some sort of official custody/visitation order.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:49 AM
4

No, don't tell them to cut it out, that will be seen as aggressive. He's going to have to learn to say no, ideally respectfully.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:40 AM
9

I didn't say otherwise, I was talking about custody and divorce law, as the OP posted referencing the historical caregiver status of men. If you think men cannot be nurturing caregivers, then you are sexist, and part of a major problem that men's rights is fighting. As men are just as, if not more capable than the mother despite natural differences.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:21 AM
1

It depends on the person, that's what dating is for. That's why dating experts always say no sex on the first date, get to know them first, and numerous other things actual experts say, unlike those coaches following the value system or alpha system.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:09 AM
1

Most dating coaches of said philosophy act as if they're pumping these guys up to get fit. The problem is, as a dating scheme, it still involves alot of other bad advice, and alot of people use it to make themselves incels instead of doing better. Not to mention the philosophy isn't even completely true in the animal world its proponents supposedly get it from.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 01:49 AM
1

What gender roles do you think people are taking on? Why do you think it's because of brainwashing? Why do you think it's keeping people poor? I never said you advocate for woman hating, Steinem never officially said she hated men, as far as i remember, she was still a respected extremist, and caused much harm.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 01:42 AM
3

That was the actual law, the, "early years" doctrine came in the 1800s where the idea of, "best interest" meant that mothers, seen as more nurturing, usually got younger children, unless she was accused of a crime, or abandoning them. This backfired on fathers by the 1930s, probably 1890s to 1930s, as male adultery becomes just as bad as female adultery in the public eyes. From about the 30s to the 1970s I think it was standard to favor mothers overall. But pre1890 it was likely men who were giv…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 01:04 AM
4

Idk what you're on about, most men got sole custody in any event until the 1920s/1930s, the only thing they didn't know was how to breast feed, obviously.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 12:38 AM
0

She was rather harsh calling him a bum. I am very upset because usually she's not too bad. But that was hurtful. 😳 Idk what you want from a TV judge man, she was still on his side, but from what I remember, he was indeed a bum.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 12:35 AM
1

You sound like Gloria Steinem thinking everything is about a power dynamic. Using language to insincerely conflate how many people actually believe it. You're just being an extremist like her.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 12:05 AM
16

Make it discrimination to charge men more for vehicle/health insurance before an incident happens.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:51 PM
2

We need less government intervention in alot of areas before we give them more control anywhere else.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:49 PM
3

What you're asking for is what radical feminists want, it will lead another Jim crow situation. The system is fair, we are all represented, if you get what you want, over 50% of people would be ignored, the women representatives would make law that conflicts with other genders, as would any sort of party separated like that.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:22 PM
3

Always bring a lawyer for legal issues.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:13 PM
39

Next time don't be a Karen, the biggest mistake they make is telling the person whom they're reporting that they're going to report them. Shut up and just report them next time.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:07 PM
6

This is not related to civil rights, this is a dating/personal issue. No one outside the manosphere/female dating strategy acknowledges this value system.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:03 PM
1

The best thing to do is treat everyone professionally, not personally, office talk should only be office talk, not gossip, not home talk, not politics. There are usually workplace policies supporting this, and they exist for a reason. Sometimes people, even entire teams, need to be reminded of said policies.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 01:08 AM
-1

There are benefits, and we have several body parts that aren't needed.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:00 AM
0

Except it is, parliament freaked out over it.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:38 PM
0

I've seen it in person.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:31 PM
0

From a country promoting medically assisted suicide for patients and non patients who aren't on palliative care.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:29 PM
0

And it can all be completely averted with a circumcision, and parents should be able to make an informed decision about it.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:26 PM
-1

No, the clitoral hood, and any skin in the area, will not create infections to the degree that foreskin can, it might make them swell, it might smell bad, but you can get gangrene levels of infection under foreskin due to the way foreskin functions.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:17 PM
0

It is different, the foreskin can create health issues, the female equivalent does not, they are very different. Women don't get infected under their skin as a direct result of having it.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:09 PM
-10

Possibly, I support circumcision in many cases, including parents choosing it for babies, but doing so because you're gf wants it is like killing yourself because someone told you to. If she doesn't like you uncircumcised, she won't change her mind after, the problem is not usually the penis. I do hope that you feel great about your decision though, and there are many benefits to circumcision, lasting longer, and easier cleaning, and no pain during sex being a few of them.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:55 PM
1

Both nations support parent's rights, and no nation actually supports one or the other choice. Canada is far from a good point for healthcare anyway, they offer MAID to suicidal patients, and non suicidal patients.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:43 PM
1

All of your information is only told by special interests groups, even in countries that have low to no circumcision the hospitals and medical researchers say that it's safe, most risks simply involve scarring, and they tell the complications specific to foreskin due to the way foreskin works and it's far different from any other body part.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:33 PM
-5

I disagree, the parents should retain this right, as someone who has been circumcised all the benefits are true, and the risk of foreskin related complications throughout one's life is completely negated. FGM does not compare, women don't have foreskin, and their genitals are completely different.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 07:35 AM
1

He's not tradcon at all, at least try to stop being partisan on issues. He's considered libertarian, I'm pretty sure traditional conservatives consider him left.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 06:36 PM
1

But his only example were lies, and misrepresentations.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 06:27 PM
6

He's using it literally from what I've read.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/23 08:25 AM
17

That's not a partisan issue, I've never heard a conservative ignore such things, certainly haven't seen one empathize with a female perpetrator. No one said it has anything to do with feminism, but there are many feminist groups who continue to defend Amber Heard.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:16 AM
1

Last time I saw Fiamenco she was practically run off stage by angry feminists. Felt really bad for her, she messed up on one phrase, and the mob was ready.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 06:59 AM
1

Idk how NZ law works, I don't agree with every point in the letter either, parents have the moral right to certain decisions. Regardless, in the US it usually takes special interests groups, including researchers, to convince a politician to just to get their own researchers on it.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 06:53 AM
3

Well.. Dr Ruth Westheimer had at least one guy on her show asking for help with getting laid and losing virginity. Who knows how many callers she may have had. There was at least one attempt at MRA in the 1900s, and it went the way of redpill, mobbed by lonely, angry men complaining about women.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 06:32 AM
1

What has the reaction been locally so far?
/r/MensRights03/02/23 06:03 AM
1

Are there examples or current controversy as to how the HRC has not fulfilled equality obligations to men in NZ? I'm not familiar with the situation, I do not live there.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 05:25 AM
2

I'm confused, what exactly does section 5 say? There wasn't really a complaint to change anything, you just said they're not doing their job in general?
/r/MensRights03/02/23 04:46 AM
-11

I know, but they're just writing from an anti-feminist standpoint, not a from a stand on defense of MRA, or men, or men's issues.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 04:18 AM
7

Wtf does Greta thunberg and Jordan Peterson have to do with MGTOW, she's an adult btw, not a kid, and an average environmentalist. Jordan Peterson doesn't support the views of MGTOW, he's always been about reconciliation. Your video said nothing about an empathy gap, or MGTOW for that matter. As to the video itself, thunberg is often criticized, she was even when she started, all of those tree huggers are, and Peterson often has left and right personalities on his side, he just chose to practice…
/r/MensRights03/02/23 03:24 AM
2

Idk, there's not enough information. What did the notice say? stating that due to probability I was a father of a child Due to what probability, what were they asking for?
/r/MensRights03/02/23 12:59 AM
-19

What does this have to do with men's rights or issues?
/r/MensRights03/02/23 12:45 AM
1

You must be a pill person, you intentionally miss interpret things that I clearly said, even claim i said things that weren't said. Just like 3rd wave feminists. You said that I said there were calls for violence on TRP, and that I cite media as the source for the information. I did not, I am not discredited, anyone can see what was said. I essentially said that, these guys weren't challenged on their beliefs, that they were in the pill people echo chamber, the rules there stating that you are n…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 10:48 PM
-2

The harsh treatment is not likely due to bias, but to behavior common to boys of low income families, such as calling out answers, or talking over the lecture. The same with girls, lower income girls tend to avoid calling out, I imagine from watching the boys being chastised, possibly other reasons in conjunction. In general girls are more chastised for dress code than boys, the reasons for which are often more sexist to boys in the promotion of the idea that boys are stupid and the male gaze is…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 10:18 PM
1

I didn't say there were, I'm speaking of certain manifestos written before terrorist attacks, and the media directly tying certain terrorists to red pill and mgtow, because those people were apart of those groups.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 09:21 PM
4

Wait until you go down the rabbit hole of the Sadker's research. This was in the 90s. Christina hoff somers is particularly disdainful towards them, there may have been political bias between them, but she makes good points against them. She and they appeared on the PBS radio show- Talk With the Nation- with a teacher to discuss the Sadker's research and suggestions to promote lateral thinking in favor of girls, PBS brought on the teacher to explain pros and cons of her teaching that way, and So…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 08:15 PM
1

So we are assuming the entire population emptied?
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:45 PM
1

So why do it?
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:38 PM
3

I personally think they imply more negatives, but I didn't want to presume a political stance.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 08:14 AM
0

I disagree with them philosophically, I was watching when it started and it was about men's rights, and when the lonely mob, for lack of a better term, took over and made it about complaining about women, and spreading terrible dating advice. Try to post or comment something that doesn't fit their narrative and they'll treat you just like the feminists. They were quarantined for a reason, that reason was that their philosophies were used as an excuse for violence, I do not support attacks, but t…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:43 AM
1

Again, how exactly does ignoring male victims, and female perpetrators help in any way?
/r/MensRights02/02/23 06:17 AM
1

None of the women I know care, hell you can still talk to mail-order-brides, I think all those date-asian/russian-women sites are still around.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:53 AM
1

None I know care.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:45 AM
7

Are they renaming it?
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:12 AM
3

I asked you first.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 04:57 AM
2

Who is a feminist?
/r/MensRights02/02/23 04:47 AM
2

Can you at least learn to spell before you attempt to troll?
/r/MensRights02/02/23 04:44 AM
1

There should be several Swedish subs as well where people can probably give you better answers. I was looking into going to Ireland and found a couple.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 03:29 AM
2

Using a throwaway since I'm in some subs that don't like posters in this sub What subs do that? Check the official immigration laws before you jump into the treatment of genders. They, EU nations, generally have the same laws the US does, except the laws aren't under threat in the EU, like they are in the US. Most jobs don't allow for immigration, because local hires are enough. One can also marry in. They're rarely below 5th in the WEF for gender pay gaps, https://sweden.se/life/equality/gender…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 03:22 AM
5

No it hasn't, it happened years ago to redpill and seduction, and a handful of others, where they were quarantined, and that's where all the extremists hiding behind MRA, or the fuckboys stayed. They were basically the male versions of femaledatingstrategy and rad/intersectional feminist subs, and did not allow dissention under threat of bans and bullying. Nor did they allow civil discourse. They did not self police, and got blamed for radicalizing men, which they did.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 01:06 AM
3

How about prisons have at least a 1:1 guard:prisoner ratio at all times. There will still be corrupt guards, but from what I've heard prison rape happens more because of the lack of supervision, than corrupt staff ignoring, or participating.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:03 PM
1

It's common knowledge that the military, especially front line soldiers, are 99% male, it's not disingenuous to say men and women. As I said in the edit, it's something that's never needed specification, because it was common knowledge. It never caused feelings about value before.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:59 PM
0

I did not ignore the death, I specifically stated that she's incorrect to say that women are dealing with the brunt of consequences, when people are dying in the combat zones. It's still important to note the impact on civilians, is it not? Can I not use nuance, and expect others to use context clues?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:41 PM
0

This is why no one respects common MRA'S, in no way did I suggest that men weren't the majority dying, I literally supported the fact that people in the combat zones, mostly men, are the ones taking the brunt of the consequences. We want respect, but most act just like the 3rd wave feminists when it comes to reactionism and civil discourse.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:36 PM
1

You posted on the main thread, you didn't reply to my comment, if I had not been looking I could not have seen it. By definition equality and equity are synonymous with equal opportunity. But equity has been used, nearly exclusively, by those promoting equal outcomes, particularly in partisan politics, so it's definitely tied to equal outcome, and policies supporting it.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:53 PM
3

No, even jokes are weaponized at this time.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:11 PM
13

No because men's rights is not a religion, while not excluding the religious. It would become like modern feminism. Creed is not simply made, it requires all relevant parties to come together and argue over doctrine. The incels and pill people would want to be modern feminist, just the male version, the left want equity, often in the form of communist policy, and the right want equality with the caveat of tradition, there are too few moderates to police or prevent that creed from becoming redpil…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:04 PM
5

I think some would be cold, cannot deny that there are angry people, but I don't think it would get the backlash that post did.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 06:52 PM
41

I bet if we gender swapped that post it would get very different reactions. I'd bet money on it. I think some users here would do the same in such a post, but I don't expect most would.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 06:50 PM
1

Yes, I mentioned that, that there are those who disagree with that notion, or do not wish for it. I don't see why you are relating it to feminism.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:59 AM
1

Ok, not sure what that has to do with this comment.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:48 AM
2

Not in the context, especially after saying that there is a front line.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:10 AM
3

Your original examples aren't grounding, seduction was just another femaledatingstrategy possibly for men, and red pill hasn't been grounded since before 2015. None are masculine pov's. They're just excuses to stay alone or become fuckboys. Purple pill debate allows such people to post, it is a debate sub of course. I'm not sure what you're looking for in a male pov, we're highly individual, though there are political mini groups here who may disagree with me on that, or not wish for it.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:43 AM
-4

Didn't say otherwise.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:22 AM
-2

To dodge the draft and escape war of course, what are you getting at? Are we not talking about men's rights regarding drafts?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:17 AM
14

Right, because western conservatives made the browncoats, and red guard, it's the right that formed defense garde groups to bully and intimidate dissenters and people accused of misconduct, under the guise of protecting victims. The right wing philosophy is the one who's promoters called science curriculum, "part of a discredited borgois christian legacy indistinguishable from Imperialism." The right wing teachers are the ones who call their own students sexist for critiquing the promotion of se…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:31 AM
27

I'm not tired of it, I lean right, there is an important point, equity and equality are different. Equity supporters tend to support policies that force opportunity before merit. Equality supporters tend to support policies allowing opportunity on everyone's individual merit. You don't deserve the downvotes for wanting equity, you do for being hostile to allies, we should not let men's rights go the way of feminism, splintered and with the controlling group full of radicals. It was leftist philo…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:01 AM
17

Because let's be real, if she has a baby and doesn't want it, she probably won't have to pay child support at all That depends on where you live, I knew a guy who got alimony because he had lost his job before the divorce, and she made a significant amount of money, he didn't have to pay child support due to this, and if he did it would come out the alimony. Do not be sad about the divorce, he was not nice when he was with her, they were equally toxic, and do better as co-parents.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:04 AM
6

Haven't read it, but you've described every romance book featuring the female ego trope that I have seen. I hope that readers, especially the younger readers, understand that it's fantasy and there should not be a goal to change the hot bad boy, because that rarely works out.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:26 AM
2

Fgm never claimed to have health benefits, they are not remotely the same. It's only done to older girls, there are feelings of ptsd for doing so. Fgm had claimed to help hygiene, but there was nothing backing those claims, we know what happens when men don't wash under the foreskin, and it's not pretty. Everything else in favor of FGM included social norms,small religious sects, and male pleasure. They are completely different issues.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:25 AM
-17

Ukraine conscripted women too, after the invasion started. Are you saying it was only trans women who were part of that group? Is it not mostly women remaining in the peaceful areas that are left? I'm genuinely asking.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:21 AM
2

In addition to the sources I sent to you in another comment, literally every other hospital, medical college, and others.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:49 AM
2

Why? It provides benefits to the child that I feel outweigh the risks of the procedure, benefits that have already been said.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:46 AM
0

Idk what triggered you sir, but we do need to look at ways to prevent ourselves from being victimized. Whether or not the law is on our side. What do you think the OP's topics were? Because I posted on some, why are you assuming my position on others?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:40 AM
1

Right, because special interests groups specifically made in opposition to my stance could not possibly be biased. What the article neglected to say is that this is a surgical procedure, and they're MRI-ing a baby, they neglected to mention that both those things would affect the areas they're looking at. There's no legitimate research that circumcision alone causes a difference in brain function for adult men, or boys. It's been researched by unbiased groups for longer than anyone's been alive,…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:29 AM
2

I said that there are risks to the procedure, but that parents should be allowed to chose based on their own analysis, and should not be shamed for either choice. I'm not here to convince you to get circumcised, just to say it's not evil. Since you won't take a primary source saying that he's not ever had to worry about those things due to foreskin, here's plenty of scholarly sources on it. https://www.londonchildrensurgery.co.uk/blog/are-there-any-benefits-of-circumcision-in-babies/ https://med…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:22 AM
1

Now you're being disingenuous. I said that, in any sexual situation wrap your junk. I said that if there are conflicting goals in the relationship, it's best to part ways, before a situation like this arises.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:05 AM
3

No, the complaint mainly surrounds child support. If someone is disingenuous with their status of chemical birth control, that is very close to stealthing, rape by the way of removing the condom without telling the other person, and getting the okay. That is not currently illegal for women, so condoms remain the best way to prevent such situations. Stop being so reactionary.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:00 AM
2

I don't have to pull skin to clean the penis. Decreased risks of UTI's. Less risk of certain STD's, I'd argue less pain with certain ones as well due to the way foreskin works. Less risk of penile cancer. And no risk whatsoever of conditions such as phimosis, or any related to cleaning of the foreskin.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 02:43 AM
26

I think his manifesto was propaganda to cause more terrorism and chaos. It is true that many pill people defend it though. They should be scrutinized heavily, maybe even silenced. Yet no one remembers Valerie Solanas, or they'll say it doesn't count because her attempt at murder only targeted one person, and failed. Many also praise her.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 12:37 AM
17

They're not even accepted then unless they have certain political beliefs. Well even then women still have that bathroom debate on trans women. It is important to note that there are naturally feminine men, and they are still men.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 12:22 AM
4

Well, they do have it really bad there. They should extend it to men of certain tribes and religions, the Taliban, as far as I'm concerned, has committed genocide in the past, to say they aren't now that they have control is naive.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 12:07 AM
4

Yes, I was talking about preventing pregnancy, after it's done, there's nothing you can do. I don't know any lobbying groups trying to change it.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 11:38 PM
7

No birth control is 100%, especially not women's, properly used condoms are much safer.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 11:28 PM
44

Wrap before you tap. Couples should not stay together when they have conflicting goals.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 11:16 PM
-26

I think "brunt" is a strong word, when there's still a front line defended my men and women. I doubt she is wrong to say that it's mostly women handling what's left behind those lines. Edit: I'm not sure of what I'm being accused of, or why I'm getting downvotes. Saying that "brunt is a strong word" is just another way of saying I disagree with that notion, the notion that women are taking the brunt of the conflict. Many obviously escaped, but some of you are acting like the entire population em…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 11:05 PM
1

The link is not working for me.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 10:54 PM
-4

Yes it is, the results of mismanaging foreskin are horrific, and there are no health benefits to it, there are only sexual benefits, and debatably less than those who've been circumcised. The effects of shots or sprays on the minds of kids can also be terrible, I had to be held down until my teenage years for the sake of them, and many aren't even needed, what use is the flu or varicella vaccine in a population with little to no death rates from them? I still support vaccination, for the benefit…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 09:05 PM
-3

There is risk to such procedures, but we always do what's best for kids, and we should not shame parents for picking benefits for their kids over the risks. We also vaccinate them, should we wait until the age of consent to do that?
/r/MensRights31/01/23 08:55 PM
1

Alright check your numbers right now, I'll be down voting in 30 seconds.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:08 PM
2

I neither upvoted nor down-voted it.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:06 PM
19

Women hate trans women too, you got to go at least as far as blaire White to be seen as a non threat. Trans hate is rooted in misandry, and fear mongering against men.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:06 PM
2

I said that goals prevent needless unknowns, not that they define someone.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:03 PM
1

It does exist, anyone who believes as you just never listened when society, parents, school, mentors, ect, all said make goals, and taught them how. Most women certainly have "roots," it's only in academic women's studies that they're told love and romance is a patriarchal control method.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:59 PM
2

There are many government jobs that pick former draftees over others. There are several grants for college that draftees are eligible for, and volunteer military members aren't. If you're an immigrant draftee, you gain automatic citizenship afterwards. No benefits nor drawbacks happen until a draft actually happens, and one is drafted. https://www.sss.gov/register/why-is-selective-service-important/#:~:text=By%20registering%2C%20a%20young%20man,U.S.%20citizenship%20for%20immigrant%20men.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:51 PM
-6

As someone who was circumcised as an infant, I have found all the benefits of circumcision to be true.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:44 PM
-5

Actually some, not all, trans people do feel the grass was greener. They seem to prefer dealing with the new problems in exchange for the new benefits. Even so, the bathroom debate is steeped in misandry.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:36 PM
1

If there's no paperwork, there's no official record. The HR person sent you to another store after you were told that they want people who have experience in multiple stores. Did you tell anyone but the people promoting you that you were interested in the job?
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:10 PM
1

"An enemy of my enemy is my ..." That line does not work when all the neutrals hate your first enemy more than the second. It only makes the second enemy look like the good guys.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 09:40 AM
0

She does not have an onlyfans, and even if she did, there's nothing wrong with sex workers talking about social and political issues.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 09:32 AM
1

How about Christina Hoff Somers, or do you only accept young allies? How about Lauren Southern or Blair White? They don't talk about it now, but it was all the rage in the 2010s.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 09:08 AM
1

Pro Tate is not a plus. He's definitely a male supremacist, I don't see the way he acts as civil. I can't say guilty or not about certain accusations against him, but there's certainly damning evidence that one woman retracting her accusations can't fix. I dislike his MLM scheme promoting hustlers university. But the worst, without judgment on the first point, is the terrorist sympathizing, the gross misinformation he promotes about the conflicts in Afghanistan is absolutely insane, and people a…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 09:02 AM
3

Not at all, 80% of females have reported being victims. 20% of males have reported being victims. Saying that women are the majority of the victims, and saying that it's unique to them, is a disgusting tactic to belittle men and male victims. Saying that the majority of rapists are men in such context, is also very questionable, female on victim rape is terribly under researched, and most people still wouldn't consider it rape simply because it's a woman.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 08:37 AM
6

No selective service procedure applies to women. Neither benefits nor drawbacks.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:43 AM
1

The radical feminist of the 80s started to make up most of the things they say negatively effected women, and it usually boiled down to men. Christina Hoff Somers calls out Gloria Steinam on questionable statistics back in the 90s, though i think the statistics were misread in the 80s, "Here are some examples of the kind of provocative data the public is fed. According to the gender feminists, anorexia nervosa is caused by the androcentric system that forces women to starve themselves in order t…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:14 AM
1

Extra tax claims, but alot of people don't use them anyway.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:51 AM
5

I thought we were done with the rape culture misnomer, and fear mongering in 2007. This woman is dangerous, sexist, and racist, I hope no one she talks to on bumble sees anything else. I don't see how you can see rapists in every man your own damn kids no less, or racist in every white person.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:46 AM
12

Well splitting the bill is just bad form all around. My mom always told me to go Dutch, meaning everyone pays their own bill, and getting separate checks and receipts. Splitting the bill means to split percentages of the whole bill.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:37 AM
2

Well workplace gossip is very unprofessional, this is why people are told not to do it. It can only be used against you. Remain professional, do not help this person unless explicitly asked to. Only speak about the current work, and only professionally. Stay silent around them otherwise. Document the original incident, and any future incidents in an email to yourself, this is to forward a list of your complaints to management to prove it is harassment, and not a one off incident with this person…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:53 AM
2

All the single women I've met not using it tend to treat dating apps with a bit of vanity. So do the single men I know who aren't using one.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:39 AM
6

File a formal complaint with the main office. Sometimes you have to go Karen.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:34 AM
20

I bought mine cause I want to wank off for 10 minutes, not hours, and with no repercussions, such as sore legs, they buy dildos for the same reason from what I've seen. Why should we be shamed for it?
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:29 AM
4

No, most right wing people do it on principles of tradition, and fear of crime.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:22 AM
2

Are you?
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:19 AM
14

They're the same, the only difference is when you kick someone out the friend group. Boys will straight up tell a problem friend what's up, might even give them a chance. Girls will just stop inviting them out, and may hint at what the issue was. That's in general, they both can be like the other as well.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:17 AM
17

Did you sign anything in the meeting? Was it an official write-up?
/r/MensRights31/01/23 04:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter