TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

No-Werewolf-5955 Archive

View 4 posts and 152 comments by No-Werewolf-5955 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well denying patriarchy's factual existence doesn't help -- you can not expect to have a meaningfully constructed argument immune to irrationality and falsities if you base it on false information and lies. My aim is always the truth. The best response is that patriarchy is a consequence of environmental pressures and sexual dimorphism and is seen in many species beyond homo sapiens for the exact same reasons and has nothing to do with sexual prejudice or discrimination -- it is a biological imp…
/r/MensRights29/03/26 04:08 PM
1

But seeing this single variable without any societal context is just a fallacy. When done systematically, this is the cherry-picking fallacy. By itself it isn't really a fallacy to judge the metric, but it is a fallacy to say that one metric represents the whole situation. It is also a fallacy to use this kind of thing as evidence that people are still like that -- that's the argument from history fallacy. Cause all this time, "men" were sent to war, punished harsher in family and courts, died i…
/r/MensRights14/03/26 01:55 AM
1

people who are mutually cooperating with each other aren't 'obeying'. Obey is directly contrary to liberty and freedom. Obey is a one-way relationship: slaves obey masters & privates obey generals. In both situations, both less-powerful positions have zero capacity for input into the relationship. That is accurately what obey means.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 10:25 PM
2

I agree. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 07:11 PM
2

The authors make specific note that the differences between men and women weren't statistically significant, why ignore them? ... You need to be WAY more careful when interpreting these papers the way you are. ... Respectfully, you work with stats for a living, you should know better. I made it very clear that I am looking for the source and only have a screenshot of data and can only describe it how it was previously presented. I don't have any of the source information -- only what some other …
/r/MensRights01/03/26 07:07 PM
2

strength of people by gender on a chart is similar to two normal distributions overlapping by like 1/3 (a guess). There are exceptions to the rule of the collective: that males are stronger than females. Females tend to bring weapons to domestic violence at a significantly higher rates because of the strength differential, and male victims of DV or IPV are more likely to wind up in the hospital with worse wounds because of it. This issue is well documented.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:52 PM
4

aka do not believe 2/3 females (thats about how many of them are feminist). To de-genderfy this issue, I like to point out how stupid humans are: as someone who tested in the top 95% on SAT of my graduating class, it is safe to say that it is not worth listening to the bottom 2/3 of people for generalizations or important information about the world -- as you go down the ranks of intelligence, people are just generally getting everything wrong at increasing rates and it permeates their whole liv…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:36 PM
20

drop the question mark
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:28 PM
9

It is not bait. Here is how I describe it: TRP is not one set of beliefs -- there is no authority on the set of beliefs there; males are culturally brainwashed and setup into believing all females are perfect princesses. This cultural norm is a recipe for disaster for males and tens of millions of men are suffering destructive permanent life changes because of it. TRP will tell you about bad female trends that are negatively impacting males. Some are correct, some are wrong, some are angry becau…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:24 PM
3

booo canada. Canada bad.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 09:04 PM
2

Congratulations you just defined what started The Red Pill movement and MGTOW.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 06:38 PM
4

I edited my original post showing a screenshot from a paraphilia study that shows if you separate pedophilia and hebephilia (easily arguably a form of pedophilia) that females actually perpetrate pedophilia at higher rates than males, but overall if you include the numbers for pedo and hebe males and females come out to nearly 1:1 ratio of perpetration. So i did address that issue.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 02:49 AM
5

This data that you linked does exactly what the data source I linked does and you can see it right here; they literally define rape in a way that excludes males from being counted as victims and thus their data says zero males were raped. it is a sexist discriminatory definition of rape that is intended to maximize favor for female victims while neglecting male victims entirely in order to gain political funding and favor: According to this data you linked also from the CDC, males literally can …
/r/MensRights26/02/26 02:37 AM
4

you are correct. evidence females perpetrate more frequently right here from the CDC: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1rdsl5i/comment/o7emlu0/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:53 PM
5

I am not going to waste my time teaching you how to read and think critically, rationally, or logically and understand ethics as you clearly need data to conform to your prescribed conclusions. Keep on letting the world tell you what to believe little parrot. I literally publish data for a living and know how to read it and make it. I understand when the narrative and data are being manipulated to tell a preferred story, and the CDC is twisting information and you're eating it up. But they publi…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:44 PM
7

right. confronted with legitimate evidence that proves you wrong and your instinct is to downvote and ignore.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:15 PM
4

Terminology clarification and justification: The difference in the CDC stated conclusion and my numbers is that I am using gender neutral (non-sexist) terminology for what qualifies as rape and the CDC is semantically classifying female perpetrators of 'rape' to instead be called 'made to penetrate'. To point out the hypocrisy of these sexist terms "rape" and "made-to-penetrate", if a male drugged a female or threatened her at gunpoint, and then had sex with her, you would inarguably call that r…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:12 PM
4

Really? The CDC says otherwise for rape: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/46305 And the DOJ has a study that shows female DOC are 92% of Sex crime offenders of all inmates with male inmate victims being the primary target: https://embed.documentcloud.org/documents/723250-sexual-victimization-in-juvenile-facilities-2008/ There is actually credible mountains of evidence that say you're mistaken. According to the CDC study: Made-to-penetrate (MTP) is literally rape defined in a way that allows femal…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 09:58 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1rdsl5i/comment/o7e7dpr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights25/02/26 08:51 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1rdsl5i/comment/o7e7dpr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights25/02/26 08:51 PM
4

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1rdsl5i/comment/o7e7dpr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights25/02/26 08:51 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1rdsl5i/comment/o7e7dpr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights25/02/26 08:51 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1rdsl5i/comment/o7e7dpr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights25/02/26 08:50 PM
2

Found the screencap of the data, but not the source. It appears to be a scientific study on paraphilia. Check the edited original post for details.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 08:48 PM
3

conclusions based on data, not the other way around. I make all my conclusions based on evidence so long as evidence exists. I saw the data somewhere on reddit and I didn't save it. I am just hoping someone else has seen it and can share it. Nothing about that is me searching for data based on a conclusion; it is just me searching for data that I have seen before and if you read the body of my post, you would know that. It seems like what you're looking for is a little cherry picked. That's not …
/r/MensRights25/02/26 08:02 PM
2

I don't know if it was like a criminal stat or a victim response survey.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 01:32 AM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1rdsl5i/comment/o78xbp8/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights25/02/26 01:31 AM
5

I'm positive. I saw a chart somewhere on reddit that had sexual crimes broken down by category and perpetrator gender and it included SA, pedophilia, hebephilia, rape and maybe some other stuff. I hate when i don't save things when i first see them. I can't find it now so it may as well not exist.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 01:31 AM
2

The UK is cooked. You guys lost free speech. Other nations fought disgustingly bloody revolutions for that civil liberty and you guys voted it away. That is fubar. They can literally arrest you for anything they disagree with you about. UK has arrested more people every year for the past 5 years for speech violations than any other nation on the planet including the two most notorious nations for denying free speech: Russia and China. And that is only raw numbers of arrests. When you account for…
/r/MensRights23/02/26 08:08 AM
11

I can show you exactly where this movement fails socially. The biggest problem with MRA is this: For human reproduction males are 100% required to catch a partner to reproduce. females are not required to pursue anyone -- all they have to do is accept the male that pursues them. The flaw in the strategy: Male MRA has high standards for a partner and uses MRA acceptance to filter partners MRA doesn't find partner. non-MRA females reproduce with non-MRA males male MRAs just collectively took thems…
/r/MensRights23/02/26 12:37 AM
2

Hard agree. It is impossible to find a woman who will treat you with anywhere near equally as you treat her. "I found a good one" maybe unicorns exist, but most hetero guys in relationships are completely compromised individuals.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 04:26 AM
1

Obviously you're playing 4D chess and the only person you are beating is you.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 03:59 AM
1

dude your communication is terrible. I literally asked you for clarification because I don't even understand what you are trying to communicate or what you are referencing, and you still can't answer. This is not the W you think it is. You clearly have a communications and comprehension skill issue.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 03:17 AM
1

and you can't answer a good faith question. makes you look like an arse. All I'm doing is commenting on an observation of a macro social pattern (that isn't dogma).
/r/MensRights22/02/26 02:25 AM
1

I am pointing out how stupid and disconnected people must be to need a course on this. Its absurd. Imagine having a course on "angry black men". It is more appropriate as a survey/study than a freaking course. It's not that hard to connect the dots between the title and my response.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 02:17 AM
2

what are you even talking about? I never said weakness was a virtue and nowhere in here am I mentioning anyone's dogma
/r/MensRights22/02/26 02:16 AM
1

I think I am getting downvoted from misinterpretation of my pronouns. I fixed it for clarity.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 10:26 PM
-5

edit: crossed out and bold fixes Pretty sure they've men have been telling you people what's wrong the whole time and you've people have been denying it and gaslighting them men about all the evidence they men show you people from all the studies that prove their men's points.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 09:40 PM
6

Liberal white woman hey you forgot to include disagreeing with their brainwashed cuck male supporters and worker bees
/r/MensRights21/02/26 07:52 PM
1

Marriage is wildly unsuccessful these days. It is more important than ever to filter out potential partners that are going to destroy your life later financially with a divorce and she is raising the obvious red flag my guy. Please learn from the millions of husbands before you that are screaming at society about how fucked up marriage is for men right now and take the W by recognizing that if she loves you, she would sign the prenup. Healthy relationships is a series of verbal contractual agree…
/r/MensRights21/02/26 07:31 PM
30

she has obviously already proven to you that she is considering divorcing you and wants to take your money as a threat and way out of the relationship. she has obviously already considered it and is defending her ability to do it years in the future. run dude.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 08:08 PM
10

Misandry absolutely kills its just that men are convinced to kill each other over it and kill themselves over it. And the death toll is higher than misogyny.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:49 PM
1

Criminal law was historically invented to punish and control and enslave exclusively males and it still largely operates that way.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 05:23 PM
1

what do you call that when people believe someone's innocent because they're female? is there like a term for that other than sexism?
/r/MensRights12/02/26 01:33 AM
1

Feminism has always been Marxist. It never wasn't. Conclusion: its always been anti-freedom.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 12:39 AM
3

this is a bullseye
/r/MensRights08/02/26 07:48 PM
6

Beware the queen bee and the queen ant. No self-aware male wants to be the worker in a system like that, that is one of the traditional toxic attributes normalized among females culture.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 07:28 PM
24

Steer clear bud.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:44 PM
3

The evil female in movies needs to become as hilariously disposable as the male grunt. The main problem is that no one believes they can be strong in reality so the only passing characters like that have to be scifi where they are like super heroes and villains with special powers. That's why the administrator girl boss is the only believable sellable point of getting a female antagonist in reality based fiction and its boring and predictable.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 11:19 PM
2

like women are untouchable gods It is a trope called Mary Sue. I don't get how older movies (relatively speaking) are more progressive than the slop that comes out nowadays. We are not all the bigoted insufferable assholes that gender-studies people want us all to believe we are and have convinced so many teachers that we are. That is where it is coming from. Look at like the mid 90s with the Hercules TV show versus Xena. They are cookie cutters of each other with opposite genders and are a good…
/r/MensRights27/01/26 11:17 PM
7

All I can say is be more vocal about it and get your community to actively make them feel unwelcome. Unfortunately this appears to be a consequence of feminisms adoption of marxism and critical theory where the ideology explicitly states to make every form of attempting to oppress your oppressor (females to oppress males).
/r/MensRights19/01/26 06:04 PM
2

I worked at a University where the whole (mostly female) office was openly interrogating males during meetings for feminist allegiance surprise quizzes. Our office reported directly to the VP office. The department was the Office of Institutional Research (OIR) -- responsible for all official data publications internal and external for the university. We ironically? worked directly next door to the Equal Opportunity Office. One of them also talked about her boobs as 'magic apples' and with every…
/r/MensRights17/01/26 02:01 AM
1

mens rights movement lead the way for suffrage. facts. feminism is just copying and following in our footsteps. that's how stupid this is. We lead the way on property rights too. really males lead the way for all civil rights movements. they're all just trying to copy the rights we've achieved over the millenia.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 12:45 AM
6

I can only put emotional investment into something when there is feedback of progress eventually. I have been a life-long MRA since I brought up men's issues in high school as a feminist that bought the narrative and was immediately rejected for it. I found r/MensRights a long time ago and was most active around 2014-2017. The content gets repetitive and thus desensitizing. We aren't making progress so it feels hopeless. Posts are always one of these: Feminists did this... it matters to new peop…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 05:26 PM
1

it sho am
/r/MensRights08/01/26 06:11 AM
2

Grok is the least biased. You should check it out. Claude in my experience was too similar to chatGPT (the most biased LLM available)
/r/MensRights04/01/26 05:53 PM
2

All I'm trying to do is criticize you to make you better. Keep that in mind for my response: Redefining "The Haves"... In traditional grand narratives, the "ruling class" or "the haves" are equated with the holders of property, and men supposedly control society through private ownership. But based on first principles, this definition needs to be fundamentally reconstructed: The true "Haves" are not the holders of property, but the holders of the "Control Rights over Reproduction." You are talki…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:27 PM
3

I've gotten three other redditors over here in the past few months!
/r/MensRights03/01/26 02:31 AM
4

Waiting 15m for a jump is so not a big deal. Considering the circumstance, that is abnormally fast service.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 11:12 PM
2

My dude, it is impossible to please everyone. With every good piece of work, there are always haters. On top of that, as a demographic collectively females are notoriously difficult to please in social contexts if you follow their input. You have to make your content fit your intended audience. Doing otherwise is classic route to product sabotage -- you are currently trying to make your content fit an unknown or all audiences and it is a failing strategy.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 01:17 AM
1

gaslighting people is just a standard tactic among those whose desired stories don't match the truth. They do it indiscriminately. When the truth is your enemy, lesser people will lie to everyone to get their way. - I said that.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 11:35 PM
1

Same reason people go to church and worship god.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 05:18 AM
1

Well the resistance is why they stopped implementing the draft, that combined with the fact that they are getting enough people through recruitment. So, it is a valid defense.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 01:07 AM
1

No point in worrying over it. Just do something about it.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 12:25 AM
2

This is the best. IIRC education gender gap favoring females is sorely missing from the wiki, or maybe its the FAQ.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 12:09 AM
1

The most powerful thing any male can do is learn to love yourself and love being alone. Live your life for your self. Stop looking for self-worth, validation, happiness, and love from external sources; study in depth and use these topics, stoicism, zen, logic, science, philosophy, and game-theory to run your life and let go of the traditional expectations that society places upon you. Be happy spending your free time doing things like walks, nature hikes, studying, and focusing on advancing your…
/r/MensRights25/12/25 11:52 PM
1

That is the idea.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 11:39 PM
2

Damn. Well said.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 11:39 PM
4

It's sad to see how the world has gone into a complete division It has always been that way. This is in no way a new phenomenon.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 07:16 PM
2

Dude, I referenced a fact. Go look at the survey I linked. It measures a radical feminist ideological claim and its prevalence among blacks, whites, men, and women and puts it at 67% of the population that believes in a classical radical feminist ideological claim, equal outcomes. That is an overwhelming majority.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 11:45 PM
1

Well. I know we have karma on reddit but I don't believe in that garbo. It is nice when the accurate corrections are made though.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 11:20 PM
2

“this is what I’ve read from anti feminist sources about how feminism is evil?” My life is the source my guy. I agree with a lot of what you are saying but it is mixed in with contradictions and IMO an inaccurate representation of how many radical feminist ideas are the NORM among "liberal" feminists these days. But because they are traditional, and biologically evolved that way, doesn’t mean that as an evolved society we have to assume all people should choose to fall into those systems. That’s…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 11:17 PM
2

I just want everyone to be able to do what they do without restriction simply based on gender inequality (not pretending that there aren’t differences between men and women and sometimes men are just better suited for a job First problem is right here. Feminism's hypothesis historically from sociology and gender studies was that they argued that biased gender outcomes are due to bias cultural influence and lack of opportunity -- their argument was about equal opportunity. Feminist theory was gra…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 10:06 PM
1

She eventually tried to do something similar to the host (male) of the social event location and was banned from returning. IDK what is was though I wasn't there at the time. I don't have it in me to do stuff like that.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 08:28 PM
5

Female infantilism: it is common to find feminists claiming that all of women's problems need to be solved by correcting male behavior. This is reflected in their exclusively hateful interpretation of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 06:59 PM
5

The idea that the average typical feminist is not a radical is simply mythical falsehood. Critical theory and the idea that the patriarchy is a self-serving evil force that men engage in to dominate women are standard beliefs held by nearly all feminists and it is radical. The idea that there is some hidden moderate feminists as a popular silent majority is not based on facts, and the real power of the movement -- its leadership in politics -- is all radical. Yes there exists the idea that there…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 06:57 PM
14

overall bad. A girl who told me she had been sexually assaulted and my response was "me too -- I was sexually assaulted by a woman a while ago". This was unbeknownst to me at the very beginning of the me too movement. She got mad at me, stopped talking to me, and gossiped to other people to tell them to stay clear of me because I was "making jokes" about sexual assault. That movement is as sexist as feminism has always been.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 03:18 PM
2

Yes, I would say one-third to half of my results are that the other person was actively listening and open to the information, and the other were hostile and close-minded.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:57 PM
10

YoU mUsT sUpPoRt ViOlEnCe AgAiNsT WoMeN /s
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:42 PM
1

I think it is more likely to get females added to the draft than it is to get males removed from it. It is foolish to think the government would give up its ability to force conscription as an emergency measure. Also, your facts are wrong. The draft was used in the Vietnam War -- protests did not stop that -- and while prosecutions for dodging were at a low rate of dodgers, they did happen.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:40 PM
2

It is a tactic used as an attempt to shame, devalue, discredit, and punish people publicly as a consequence for people that don't accept their dogma. It functions exactly the same as if they were religious: they would say you're possessed by demons, worshiping satan or the devil, practicing witchcraft, or going to hell. It is a manipulation tactic to shame, blame, scapegoat, devalue, discredit, disown, punish, humiliate, and use an example for others as a way to enforce consequences for disobedi…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:10 AM
12

When you talk to women (and feminists and most men to be fair) about gender inequality they are completely delusional when you compare what they say to the facts that we have available. Its like nearly every talking point they have is a hallucination.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 10:42 PM
13

That method is self-defeating. The more people that speak up and against it will cause it to go away.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 09:49 PM
1

The American dream died in the 1980s. Almost everything wrong with our contemporary economy and money in politics started there.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 09:54 PM
3

They're not
/r/MensRights17/12/25 09:35 PM
2

They do not care about males and they are not rational about equality. They just want more power.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 09:34 PM
23

Men, tend to be more helpful, more patient, and more generous with women they find attractive. Yup. I find it very interesting to see how androids and AI will change the social landscape. I am excited to see what happens and hope that I get to be alive when androids revolutionize the workforce. The idea of a android surrogate womb is wild -- and I believe it would have welcomed affects socially.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 09:19 PM
1

Complete strawman. I never claimed any of that. You are jumping to conclusions that do not follow from what I said.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 05:57 PM
1

what?
/r/MensRights17/12/25 05:35 PM
1

The enforcement of asymmetrical standards between males and females is usually enforced by both genders in asymmetrical ways. Females are way more likely to be involved in the details of beauty standards and enforcing them on each other and choose relationships based on beauty, whereas males are more likely to simply choose to flirt and partner with what they find to be more attractive and are less likely to get into beauty standard details. It is a feedback loop.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 04:04 PM
1

You're right. I stand corrected. I do, however, take point that there is a strong argument that showing breasts in public should not be legal because of the uncontrollable sexual effects it has on males. Like I said, it is arguably true or false.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 03:59 PM
3

Sure, I'll grant that as arguably true or false. Now, do you care to tally up the issues men and women are legally not treated as equals and see which one has a more pressing issue based on the priority of needs?
/r/MensRights17/12/25 03:35 PM
1

you are being completely unreasonable and not pragmatic nor are you being practical.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 02:19 PM
5

It would be called egalitarianism
/r/MensRights17/12/25 03:47 AM
14

do you guys hate feminism ? I don't have room for hate in my life despite how wrong and misguided people can be. Do you guys truly think men suffer from feminism To put simply, yes, but that is not a fair assessment as to the big picture. I would more accurately argue that males suffer from traditional gender roles enforced by males, females, biology (unavoidably), culture, and by feminism as a socio-political movement that continues to play into causing men to suffer in a traditional way that b…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 01:58 AM
-2

Data is not the plural of anecdote.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 12:53 AM
-1

The whole concept of this post is appealing to a known logical fallacies: Anecdotal Fallacy, Hasty Generalization, Fallacy of Composition, Fallacy of insufficient sample. Forgive me for asking you all to be rational.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 12:50 AM
-2

Speculating on this topic based on anecdotes is a fools errand. Find a study that addresses gender equal definitions of sexual discrimination and conducts surveys for its prevalence then you will get some real talk. Until then, nothing to see here; its all conjecture.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 12:29 AM
2

How do you expect someone to have their own home, have a job to support that life, and also commute to someone else home who they do not want to be present with anymore and do their housework? Forcing them to physically cohabitate even temporarily and cooperate is violating the concept of the divorce.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:54 PM
2

there have been zero consequences in the USA for draft dodging since the start of the Vietnam war.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 02:09 AM
1

As much as I dislike inequality, people who focus on this are absolutely wasting their time. This is likely going to be one of the most impossible things to change of all the issues males face.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 02:07 AM
1

You are not being pragmatic, and that will always lead to bad conclusions. There is no reasonable way to implement what you are talking about. This post reminds me of the time Neil Degrasse Tyson argued that sports should be categorized not based on gender, but instead on hormone ratios and hormone treatment to be 'inclusive' and 'fair'.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 01:56 AM
1

This has been happening for a long time. There are courts that won't even accept DNA tests to deny parental responsibilities for accused fathers and will exclusively use the woman's accusation with ZERO recourse denying the admission of evidence that he is not the father claiming it doesn't matter. It is crazy.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 12:19 AM
2

Biological determinism is controversial in science because of it's use in history and the potential consequences which are contrary to popular social frameworks and ethical assumptions. I agree that it is biased. I asked it again just now in general and out of context and it clearly agrees with me and claims this is not a controversy. I think it is biased to not admit some particular instances of biological determinism. When asked in general it agrees with my perspective: Biology plays a role in…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 03:17 PM
-1

MRAs need to acknowledge that this is a conservative belief. This is fundamentally tradition, and has appeared throughout history as a form of infantalism towards women and responsibility towards men most famously found these days in chivalry. All of these are or had historical codes that effectively communicated this exact same message: Ancient Greek Heroic Code, Roman Virtus, Samurai Code (Bushido), Viking Culture, Celtic Warrior Ethics, American Indian Warrior Traditions, Medieval Icelandic S…
/r/MensRights13/12/25 06:11 PM
2

My sentiments exactly.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 05:40 PM
2

I found the same results when inquiring about the reasoning behind IQ scores. Something that was difficult for me to unravel was that 'heritability' is a term used sociologically there that is not to be equivocated with 'genetic heritability'. It was a little confusing to read and understand at first, because of that. From what I gathered after understanding that distinction, the explanation is basically that the cultural attributes that lead to higher IQs are inherited. That is your environment…
/r/MensRights13/12/25 05:38 PM
2

I'm trying out Duck.ai now. It might just be the best option considering all the consequences. I did ask grok about Elon and Drumpf but I couldn't get it to repeat the obviously bias responses I had seen people talking about.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 05:27 PM
1

rate limits though.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 05:18 PM
5

the difference is going to be the kind of bias. Grok sounds like it doesn't have bias in its directive, but they are ALL likely to have training data bias. The difference is you can easily convince grok otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:30 AM
3

it literally said so. go read the post and try it for yourself.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:27 AM
2

yeah but I'd rather have an AI that is unbiased or less bias by default like Grok appears to be.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:25 AM
3

AI is an interesting new tool that makes synthesizing information and data easier than ever. The tool is smart enough to bring up relevant unconsidered and unknown issues when discussing topics. It's great for research.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:24 AM
4

I retried it on Grok and it immediately conceded the point. I like grok the best now
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:22 AM
4

holy reading comprehension batman.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:21 AM
2

chatGPT basically has default opinions based on consensus. if you make a strong enough argument that it can't refute it will agree with you. it doesn't not have a cohesive macro world I've and will thus do this for contrary positions. simply, yes it will do what you said.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:19 AM
5

Sigh... it is impossible to win. I would rather have those biases on a few people rather than biases against literally half the population. One accounts for way fewer count of mistakes being potentially made.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 11:48 AM
8

It just needed some tuning to find the sweet spot... a little this way... too far! a little that way... too far again! split the difference... just right!
/r/MensRights08/12/25 11:45 AM
33

What the fuck. The inherent hiring difference favoring women by like 20% more across every career is crazy -- all because the resume is labelled female. This should be absolutely fucking illegal.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 11:35 AM
6

It's not like they individually edit each topic, rather they have a directive file that tells the AI how to respond dynamically given certain topics.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 11:26 AM
6

Gemini does it too. Grok appears to be way more reasonable.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 11:24 AM
8

Idk, i just did a small test on Grok and I found significantly less bias. It blamed both sexes for gender gaps. It instantly admitted biology is a factor in gender gaps. I asked a few more questions and got biased answers not near as bad as ChatGPT or Gemini. But when you challenge Grok, it instantly concedes to valid counterpoints.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 11:23 AM
7

Gemini definitely does it too. OMG. GROK does NOT DO IT.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 11:13 AM
8

The mindset that "there are no good men" is primarily sustained by four interlocked logical and cognitive biases: Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy: they are ignoring obvious examples to the contrary. Confirmation Bias: they only seek evidence to support their pre-existing belief. Hasty Generalization: A conclusion is drawn from a relatively small, unrepresentative, or anecdotal sample. (This is the fallacy that racism, sexism, and classism conduct.) Availability Heuristic: the power of emotionally viv…
/r/MensRights08/12/25 03:00 AM
4

This is why your political movement can't be taken seriously
/r/MensRights06/12/25 09:13 AM
4

You would also lose all the workers required to maintain all of civilization and you would be thrown into an apocalyptic scavenger land equivalent to a modern stone age where most all the remaining people would certainly die in 1-2 years.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 07:17 AM
2

Just going my own way over here... "No you can't do that! BAN MALE SPACES!" Okay you hypocrite. I'll just find somewhere else again.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 07:13 AM
3

yeah that fits too.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 02:02 PM
2

Well thanks for the heads up. I generally have problems with both sides.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 10:23 AM
1

dude left says dumb stuff about males that is easily found as offensive but their policy isn't that bad for males -- they're all bark and no bite on the male issues, but the policies on the right are a net negative for anyone who isn't a multimillionaire and that still affects males -- the right is no bark, all bite when it comes to dealing with men. I am a centrist.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 06:29 AM
13

"A male advocate is someone who cares about some or all of the above issues, particularly if you question the feminist assumption that men are fundamentally a privileged/oppressor class with male disadvantages being a mere side-effect. We welcome a "big tent" range of positions, from moderates who believe male and female disadvantages roughly balance out, to radicals who argue female exploitation of males is at the root of all gender issues." I don't really fundamentally agree with any of these …
/r/MensRights05/12/25 02:47 AM
25

What is their plan exactly after that? There isn't one. It's all short-sighted rage. But why do they expect men to solve all their problems if they obviously can live without us ? They are being irrational. I would wager an overwhelming majority of people are irrational. So, this is normal. MEN WORK. EVERYDAY!!! So do women, but the work women do is almost exclusively work that is tertiary -- dependent on primary and secondary types of labor for them to do -- some of them choose to view this as …
/r/MensRights05/12/25 02:15 AM
-1

I can tell you don't frequent here. Your post makes it obvious that you do not browse r/MensRights
/r/MensRights05/12/25 01:59 AM
7

what women do in relationships and what women describe as what they want from relationships has in my experience never lined up. They are either unaware of their true desires or for some reason they all feel compelled to lie about it.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 10:38 PM
3

I can't watch this shrieking.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 10:23 PM
-2

This must be about the black pill.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 10:10 PM
1

Critique: timid and shallow. Well written. No root cause analysis. No sign of being educated or well informed on the topic. You don't really advance the topic of conversation with some gleaming insight so it's not really profound or moving. With all that said there can't really be and there isn't an call to action. You very much sound like you're aware there is a problem and that you don't want to get involved but you want to talk about it in a way that doesn't cause anyone to disagree or hate o…
/r/MensRights30/11/25 04:16 AM
1

::sadface::
/r/MensRights26/11/25 02:25 AM
1

Feminism has a large amount of influence directly from Marxism since it's publication. Marxism and the subsequent ideologies of Communism and critical theory are integral to the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 07:35 AM
47

But they THINK they know our views. The smear campaign from feminism is strong.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 09:40 PM
18

the black pill has some merit
/r/MensRights22/11/25 03:14 AM
5

This is refreshing thanks
/r/MensRights20/11/25 02:39 AM
0

dems want to give everyone food, fair wages, medical care, illiminate poverty. you're the bad person if you deny these things it's morally indefensible. we have the means. the only thing standing in the way is greed. Republicans literally want you to be unable to afford a doctor so you die of curable disease, they want you to beg on the streets for food, they want you to be an impoverished wage slave until you die. get your head straight.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 10:38 PM
17

I'm a vegan, atheist, antinatalist, MRA, and centrist. I am politically fighting everybody. Democrats will make white males hate themselves and be underappreciated for what you do, but their legislative policies have better results for your life. Republicans will make you feel good about being a white man and leave you high and dry homeless hungry in medical debt and impoverished because they're only interest is making the rich richer and doing whatever they want with unlimited power. they are b…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 10:38 AM
4

accused of being generally discriminatory against women.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 01:06 AM
7

yes it did.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 12:49 AM
10

you clearly haven't seen what they are saying over at female dating strategy
/r/MensRights19/11/25 12:47 AM
1

https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360045715951-Promoting-Hate-Based-on-Identity-or-Vulnerability Only 'vulnerable' and 'minority' groups are included in discrimination protections on reddit to which the admins have explicitly stated excludes whites and males.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 12:20 AM
29

Hate speech and discriminatory speech protections on reddit explicitly exclude white people and men in their official policies. That's why. https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360045715951-Promoting-Hate-Based-on-Identity-or-Vulnerability Only 'vulnerable' and 'minority' groups are included in discrimination protections on reddit to which the admins have explicitly stated excludes whites and males. They have to say things like 'vulnerable' because females are actually the majority. …
/r/MensRights19/11/25 12:11 AM
35

good luck dude. reddit is still actively banning people for promoting this. fair warning.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 11:53 PM
28

I recommend you familiarize yourself with the mens rights wiki as this covers accurately exactly what you are asking. Also checkout the mens rights FAQ as you have hit one of the questions there that is answered in more detail.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 02:06 PM
1

in the USA there are tax incentives for working with a certified women owned business.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 03:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter