TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Noltonn Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by Noltonn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Yeah I just saw this pop up from BBC and honestly this is absolutely disgusting. She says it so matter of factly, that if she were a man it'd be off to jail, like it's the most logical thing in the world that being a woman would get her an easier charge here. She doesn't even try to hide the blatant sexism. I have all the understanding in the world for alcoholism and that addiction of any kind shouldn't be treated criminally but instead psychologically. But she still made the choice to get behin…
/r/PussyPass12/04/19 12:41 PM
2

Because first of all, you don't "become" a sniper in the military. Everyone starts of the same and branches out from there, if they allowed her in the military based on the fact she wanted an out of the dangerzone job, but later on changed her mind because she wants more hands-on combat, they'd be shouting about inequality because she passed the same (lowered) standards as men, and she's worth just as much. Second, part of the reason basic training tends to be quite tough is because it should sh…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:56 AM
1

The problem is, the gray area on morals gets very black towards the end. I mean, personally, if someone was still lucid enough to walk and talk, mostly, I wouldn't count them as unconscious, because they're not. But if I told them they'd get a fiver if they tried to shit in a dog's mouth and they tried, while normally I know that's the last thing in the world they'd consider doing, I'd say her inhibitions are so much lowered that I can't morally back up the fact that she consented because she re…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:51 AM
-1

Honestly, it very much feels like a jab. There's no reason to say it, and even if there is, the wording could've been much better, even something like "Men are on average reasonable and intelligent, so...", but it's making a blanket statement about all men and the way it's worded makes me want to add an "instead of" there.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:48 AM
2

That's my point. Use those arguments I said when they bring it up. That it's not a fight. Try to make them understand and spread the word that we're not versus each other, but that we can work together for a better tomorrow. The only thing we're going to show by attacking them is proving their point that we're a bunch of entitled men, who just want attention. Stay calm and reasonable.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:53 PM
7

In my opinion, and I've said it before, the problem with this subreddit is that instead of fighting for Men's Rights, it's fighting against feminism. This subreddit should be for informing people as to how we should inform others about the problems we fight. We should stop trying to compare us with feminists, and call feminists out (in a polite but stern way) when they compare us with them. The argument "Women have it worse" is, in short, unrelated to the cause. Yes, women face other and probabl…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 09:36 PM
2

My guess is their argument would be that it would be Rape 101 for men. I also think that a similar seminar for men would either be ridiculed by the students, or it would be completely about "Men, don't rape".
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:28 PM
1

True, but the point is, the government does have this bias. I'm asking for signs that could point out to me "Yeah, she's probably gonna abuse the system when something happens".
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:22 PM
1

In a few cases, the voting age was lowered to fit the military age, with the reason "Old enough to fight, old enough to fight". There is a connection there. In all honesty, I do think people "unfit" should be drafted too, but put into fitting positions to their disability. The point was that if you had to fight for your government, you had a say in it too.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:21 PM
0

People seem to underestimate how hard it is to be jailed because of rape. What we hear is the loud minority of cases. The real problem is having your life ruined, being on a register, and walking around with permanent distrust from anyone around you. In contrast to what we want to believe, in 99% of the cases, at least some real evidence is needed.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:57 PM
2

That's private property. You can do that there, I believe, in 99% of the cases (not when nudity is involved I believe), but the phone line is not private and the other party has the reasonable assumption of privacy.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:52 PM
1

I think it has to do with the popular view that TV gives us. If you want a lawyer, you did something. Thus it makes the police assume this, and look harder to find something you did, and I have heard of cases where the police are so sure on their "instinct" to find something that they just don't stop until they get something to stick.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:50 PM
-1

To be fair, they messed up there to. And men did as well. While they were pushing for the right to vote, we should've all been pushing for them being drafted with us. That used to be the trade-off. We got to vote, but in return for the right of being a part of our governmental system, we had to serve in the military if we the situation arose. There were small movements for this, even on the feminist side, but it got mostly ignored because that is/was something men "should" do, and women shouldn'…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:36 PM
1

Alrighty, not my first language. In that case, you're right.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:32 PM
1

To be fair, in that line, it doesn't get said which is the victim, the penetrator or penetratee. So couldn't it also mean, without my consent, using my penis and sticking it in something?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:17 AM
1

Wait, I keep hearing about this FBI thing, but penetration, that's not a gender associated term right? I mean, legally, not socially. I can penetrate you with a pen if I wanted to, then it's still rape. Doesn't there have to be some kind of sticking something somewhere for it to be rape? Isn't it groping otherwise?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:28 AM
3

In all fairness, some men would enjoy it. Just like some women would. But I agree, most wouldn't, I think.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:25 AM
3

You're right. There's a lot of times, and I think this goes for a lot of men, where I feel the need to suppress how I feel about things because feeling them makes me less than a man. Be it crying about a chickflick, being hurt by something someone said, being attacked or even being raped. We are told so often that these are not things we should feel that it's so deep in our systems that we tell ourselves we don't. I promise you, you will never hear a man admit to someone that he cried himself to…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:21 AM
1

I have a question. The reason men could vote and women couldn't, doesn't this have something to do with that men got drafted and women didn't? They saw it as repaying their country for being able to have a say in it, right? And in some cases the voting age got lowered, so that they could also lower the drafting age? So does that mean that, while women do get the benefits men have, they didn't get the corresponding negatives that we got in return? I'm not 100% sure if this is correct, but if it i…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:03 AM
-1

I get that, but my point is, women hit men more than men hit women, but this is not a completely valid point to bring up in discussion, because on average men hit harder than women too. I am not saying it's right, just that this number is a bit skewed for circumstances.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:40 PM
3

I've been trying to explain this for a while now. They took the point of CS, and pushed it just over the edge to illegality, which was quite easy. We are not even close to illegal here, we just have an unpopular opinion. If they in any way push us into illegality, it will look like an obvious attack. Now, lets shut the fuck up about this. It has nothing to do with us except that someone mentioned we'd be next, which we won't be.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 08:12 PM
-8

In all fairness, the force a woman hits with is usually less than the force of a man. I've seen women hit men, and the other way around, usually women hitting men is a bitchslap, and men hitting women is a punch. But I still agree with you. Just pointing that out.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:50 PM
-2

Gawker is stupid, but this has nothing to do with their views on men, as they also have an upskirt section. This has no place in /r/mensrights. Nor does any of this reddit drama really.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:40 PM
0

I have to admit, you bring up a fair point.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:44 AM
2

Change it so that schools can't expel students and employers can't fire on merely accusations and make sure women who do make false accusations are actually punished for doing so, to start with. To be fair, I was only going into your statement, which was objectifying women vs automatically treating men like rapists, not rape vs false rape accusations. The first have nothing to do with eachother in how you fight them, the second, I admit, does.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:42 AM
3

That might work on a middle school level, pre-(or around the start of)puberty, but any further than that not really.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:58 PM
6

I'm assuming this is an older woman, at least 25. Lesbians at that age will probably not try to hit on women that they know aren't interested in their gender. I don't have a problem with this, at all. For the same reason I don't have a problem with male parties. There's just a different atmosphere if you mix sexes. If that's not the atmosphere you want, you're free to not invite the other sex.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:19 PM
4

I'm sorry, but it's not "shit happens". This man's life, among a lot of other men as the result of false rape charges, has been ruined. We're getting back to MR vs Feminism here again. You're comparing two problems that have nothing to do with eachother, really, and saying "this one is worse, lets concentrate on this one and leave the other".
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:03 PM
1

Basically, as a straight white man, "your people" (and mine) have most recently oppressed and discriminated against basically every other person. "We" still oppress gay people. In, what, the 50's we heavily oppressed women and black people (and to a certain extent "we" still do). A while before that (in America, but not where I'm from), "we" enslaved black people. These are all in recent memory. The problem is, "we" haven't been the only slavers, or discriminators. We're just he most recent agai…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:49 PM
2

Society should stop viewing men automatically as rapists. We should stop demonizing men, to the extent that they can't walk on the street anymore, after a rape accusation. An article here (or on the frontpage, I'm not sure) for instance, about a man, even after he has been proven to be innocent, people still beat him up and break his windows, and had been forced to move.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:12 PM
1

I keep asking the last question too, and the answers always boil down to that society does not consider it rape if the man is the victim. Then it's just a stupid drunk decision. I wish someone could explain the logic in people's heads there.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:52 PM
2

The problem is, there is such a thing as playing hard-to-get. Our society is not built on exact words of agreements and disagreements, context means everything. If I had to wait for a yes each time I had sex, each time I had sex would now have been rape (and this is mostly with my girlfriend). Take it or leave it, but if you say "No" once it does not make it "No" forever. If later on you indicate that you do want to, even if it isn't with a clear yes, I still see it as consent.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:50 PM
8

I have to admit, a few months ago, when I started to frequent /r/mensrights, it was a lot less circle jerky. I looked at the first page posts a bit just now, and noticed a lot of the posts barely had anything to do with Men's Rights, and were more about the bitching others have about Men's Rights (while a real problem, not one that should be focused on so much). I personally think there should be a real cleanup of this subreddit, and bring it back to actually addressing the problems there are in…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:15 PM
12

No, stop it. Men's Rights is NOT there to be the oposite of Feminism. They are not there to fight you, or cry "We have it worse!" The point of Men's Rights is that there are problems for men too, some very serious. Male rape is seen as comedy (see: the subject of male prisons on TV), men are seen as the lesser parent, whatever the case, especially in legal situation, women abusing men is seen as socially acceptable, or again, comedy... Among other things, these are the issues Men's Rights focuse…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:55 PM
1

To be fair, they bring up one fair enough point. Men tend to feel less direct pressure when it comes to having a kid, which is having their body fucked up and having to go through the painful process of deciding to get an abortion or not. By this logic, men would feel it less horrible to forget one day, especially a single man who enjoys his one night stands. I'm not sure if this would actually make a man more forgetful, but there is some logic in it, I believe.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:19 PM
1

Interesting, never heard of it before. Thanks.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:07 AM
1

I agree with your general statement, but I believe a significant amount of suicides are, with all due respect, premature. See, if you exhausted all options, and you have no way out of the clusterfuck of your brain, and you just can't stand another minute on this earth, I agree, your body your choice. But there's always therapy, and maybe medications, or a change of lifestyle. These things can significantly lower the influence your depression has on your life. This isn't coming from some yuppie a…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:04 AM
0

Do you by any chance have any source for any learning disorders being allosomal recessive (sex-linked)? Things like red-green colour blindness are bound to this, and hemophilia, I know that, but I can say that I never came across any learning disabilities carried on X-chromosomes.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 10:55 AM
1

I'm curious, these numbers are about diagnosed difficulties. Is there a chance that boys are just diagnosed because of some bias against rowdy boys and the way they express themselves in comparison to girls, and thus more easily put on drugs, and put in therapy (things I know can be really tough on people and will fuck up your school for a bit till it evens out)?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:16 AM
1

This is actually what I thought for a long, long time. I always thought that if someone really want to commit suicide, really didn't see another way out, I would tie the noose myself. Until my girlfriend called me up at 4 AM and told me she couldn't handle life anymore. I'm not going for the "suicide is selfish" angle here, I see why someone would do it, and I have at some point actually heavily considered myself (note: It takes more alcohol for me to die than to pass out), but the amount of pai…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:52 AM
12

Look at TV, if Barney is HIMYM gets slapped by a woman he hits on, the laughtracks are rolling. But if some guy slaps a woman with the same force, it's be a story arc for a couple of episodes, involving him endlessly apologizing or him turning out to be a completely abusive man.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:16 PM
2

Don't hit back, seriously. Women have tried to slap or punch me, it usually results in me subduing them by grabbing their wrists and holding them in place until they calm down. I have pretty good reflexes from fighting with other boys when I was a kid, so I can honestly say I have never been assaulted by a woman, nor have I assaulted a woman myself. Only subduing in a reasonable fashion with minimum pain involved.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:11 PM
6

Alright, I'm going to try to explain this the best I can. Let's take clubs and bars as an example. If you go to a bar, as a man, you rarely ever get hit on, right? Maybe one out of a hundred times, unless you're ridiculously attractive. I can assume you're not. But a woman will get hit on quite a bit more. It's not as much as TV wants you to believe, in general, but it is quite a lot. Easily 5 people will try to hit on any somewhat attractive woman if she's alone in a bar. Now my question is, if…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:07 PM
1

But what is a good way to argue with someone who is insisting that I am an immoral pig and a rapist for having sex with someone who has in any way been intoxicated? I can't find a way to word my thoughts in such a way that there isn't an easy, and false, comeback like "victim-blaming" or that I'm just morally corrupt.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:53 AM
1

I can turn this around and ask you what there is any science to back up male gay couples are worse off that a heterosexual couple when it comes to kids.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:00 PM
6

I have a serious question, and I might make a topic about it here (or somewhere else) later if I don't get a response. What is rape? When I grew up, rape was always depicted as a violent act, men in balaclava's did it while bashing in window's of a house with a woman alone in it, or sex acts as a result of daterape drugs (very prominent in my area). Until I was about 15 or 16 (before I had any real experience with it in my friend circle and reading on it on the internet) I thought that was about…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:54 PM
2

Is it really at all rape though? I mean, why not just call it what it is, if you regret it in the morning, it was a stupid decision. The fact that you made the choice inebriated or not doesn't make it less your choice, because you chose to become inebriated. Keep in mind we are talking about a theoretical situation here where two inebriated consensual adults decided to have sex. The issue is a bit more complex when one party is drunk and the other isn't, but even here it's very biased towards wo…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 03:06 PM
1

I don't really see this as a feminism issue but more a general work issue. First, I believe you were the new guy. The places I've worked usually put the most shitty hours and have the shittiest attitude to the new guy, because he doesn't fit in anyway, and because they have to get you worked in (if you're 1-2 months new at least). A lot of this should have been focused on a new-new guy, if he came. Yes, part of this is women sticking together, but from your original point, it's not nearly all of…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 01:59 PM
3

But can't I claim the opposite as well? I have had sex when drunk. I'm quite young, and haven't had much sex, but most times have been under the influence of something, on both sides. Hell, the first time me and my girlfriend had sex I knew she was nervous beforehand, so we had some vodka to loosen us up (this was done with the intent on both our sides to have sex while intoxicated), and we had quite a bit. She's very nervous and shy about her body, and afterwards she had mixed feeling about the…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 03:35 PM
2

I think her being admitted is a good thing if you want to get the child yourself. The breastfeeding and things like that shouldn't stand in your way, do what's right for the kid. There are enough supplements that do just as well a job I think. I want to push this on your though; Be fair. If she is legitimately crazy, yes, take the kid away from her, and don't let her see the kid if you think this would severely damage it, if you can. But, I have seen a lot of men here talk about women taking awa…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 12:05 AM
3

You can't do much. Prepare financially, try to keep expenses low, first of all to save up some money, second to be prepared to live off of less means than you usually would, depending on your current financial stability. Don't put a dime into the child itself until you know it's yours, because chances are that it's a waste of money, it sounds like it's the more probably option. Also, decide what you want to do if the child was born. Do you want her to take care of it, and you have visitation rig…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 09:55 PM
2

I liked the bit where she started talking about how not every woman wants to get married, but she never takes into account that maybe at her age, men are looking for something more long-term. I mean, she's about 30, at this point, quite a few men without a long term relationship start feeling that maybe they should start trying to commit, and some woman that just wants to use them for sex might not be the best way to get this. Maybe she should start looking for younger men, or try to find the Ba…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 06:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter