TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Novitschok Archive

View 3 posts and 233 comments by Novitschok on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
44

Why are the 3 'gentlemen' not on the frontlines themselves? They seem to be more than capable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 01:18 PM
13

Rape is hard to prove, thats why prosecution rate is so low. Be glad, that we have a justice system that needs proof to bring one to jail. Having a single testimony as sufficient proof would be very grim. Its bad enough in this case here, but evil people would run rampant if the burden of proof in court was relaxed
/r/MensRights22/01/25 03:56 PM
0

By utilizing it.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:07 PM
26

Its a shame, because Sociology or Gender Studies desperately needs researchers with focus on male Studies, but those people effectively get bullied out of those studies (before they even enroll). I basically have a very similar story to yours 🥺
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/24 04:37 AM
14

There is one instance that may be relevant, where he made a Boys vs Girls contest, but his team decided beforehand that in the current climate, boys can't win against girls, so he gave the girls massive advantages. Boys still were winning, so he paid some of the boys team members 10k so that they lose intentionally. Sucks for the boys team members that didn't got paid to lose, and says something about the current situation in media.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 11:50 AM
1

Yes. Point is, zinc spark occura at fertilization of the egg. 1 day of fertilization, there are 2 cells, 2 days there are 4. After about one month you have a blastocyst which is litterally a tiny ball of cells. There is not even a nervous system. Why wouldn't it be okay to abort this?
/r/MensRights29/07/24 12:17 AM
2

Directly after the zinc spark, its not even a fetus, its an embryo. There aren't even organs. They start forming in the 8th week. Then its a fetus. Before that, its literally a clump of cells.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:55 PM
8

Do you have a link?
/r/MensRights26/07/24 12:56 AM
10

TikTok
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 01:06 PM
6

I'm in my 20s , Dates more or less never include Restaurants. We rather meet at a nice place, have a Bluetooth box, some snacks, a few beers and/or Joints with us and enjoy the moment. Its far more comfortable and less awkward than a restaurant. This seems to be true for girls and boys of all classes. Can't speak for US, but in western europe this is the Standard for young people dating. Restaurant is for friends or if you are already in a relationship. When I go dining with my girl, I usually p…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 12:33 AM
9

Hey, firstly I genuinely feel sorry for you, this toxic debate is going on for too long and really excavated some dark sides out of people. I don't think it is worth sacrificing a deep Connection you have for this. Try to avoid heated debates and maybe spend some time reflecting about how you can best communicate that you are hurt. Getting angry usually has no point, staying quiet and factual communicates hurt far better. Maybe try to explain that getting accused of such things places you in a d…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 10:30 AM
2

If you say so....
/r/MensRights10/06/24 08:56 PM
0

Look, no one is stopping you from talking like this but don't be surprises if people get creeped out by this language (as most do). As in OPs case, I agree its unfair (and shows a lack of self awareness and reflection) if you condemn 'females' but use 'males'. And of course there were feminists you tried to argue some bullshit reasons why the use of 'males' is okay while 'females' not, because PaTrIaRcHy etc. Thats hypocritical bullshit, both are just weird.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 08:55 PM
-1

I'm not offended, it just sounds weird to talk about people like animals.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 08:43 PM
5

Agree with the hypocrisy, but feminists always will find a way to be hypocritical.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 08:42 PM
-2

Tbf, she used male as an adjective, thats a difference. Like 'a male/female scientist etc. Using it as noun (a male/female) just sounds cringy, I would never talk like this about fellow people. Biologists refer like this to animals (the male is hunting) , and maybe scientists refer like this to their [human] test subjects and thats precisely how it sounds. Like you're talking about another species. Some feminists refer to men as males and it sounds weird. Of course it also weirds out women. The …
/r/MensRights10/06/24 08:29 PM
13

Vague definitions are one of the core doctrines in feminist peer reviewed surveys. STEM is one of these examples (and many Others for example the confusion of sexual harrasment vs sexual assault). If it was honest, women would dominate these studies too, but it doesn't fit the patriarchy narrative. Unfortunately, most people only read headlines and don't understand the mathematical concepts of statistics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 10:10 PM
40

Heroic ☮️
/r/MensRights16/01/24 07:19 AM
10

World would be in flames after a few days. Exploding Nuclear Power plants, oil rigs, refineries, other heavy industries etc. Because they are not maintained anymore leading to system failures. Probably after 5 days. After that comes complete power, water and fuel outage, failure of distribution of goods and after about 10 days probably the fall of the last civilization.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 12:11 PM
2

Hmm maybe try it on pc in your Browser?
/r/MensRights07/01/24 07:04 PM
9

Go to "my Profile", then click on the button "edit" next to your Avatar, there should be the Option to add a picture from your gallery.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 11:43 AM
5

Yes, from what I've seen, in england men are more often victims of acid attacks than women, so I would suggest completely different motives.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 03:32 PM
5

Thats true. What bugs me about contemporary debate culture ist the fact that men seem to be the only demographic group where pigeonhole thinking is acceptable, while adding additional information, which makes the statement more precise, would deem it racist or otherwise unacceptable. This is not only toxic but outright dangerous.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 11:57 AM
6

Its classic Math Walsh that he left that crucial fact out.... Its still pointlessly gendered though 😅 Its not a common practice amoung (western) men to throw acid on women or relatable "acts of honour", but more of a middle eastern practice, where its socially acceptable.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 11:36 AM
1

Pale Moonlight is one of the most epic episodes in the whole Franchise
/r/MensRights22/12/23 09:19 AM
4

Yes but upper class men are the only ones she cares for, she doesn't give a shit about middle/lower class
/r/MensRights07/11/23 12:27 PM
23

Its Like they mistook the little pink book on feminism for a real guide (instead of satire) 😅
/r/MensRights31/10/23 10:46 AM
7

Jep, he also compared blaming men with blaming feminism, which cannot be equal, because men are a birthgroup while feminism is a (toxic) ideology
/r/MensRights24/10/23 02:33 PM
13

But what if Feminist political activists are a direct cause of a problem? For instance the duluth model or biased hiring qoutas? You need to challenge feminism to politically change this.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:41 PM
9

Think before you sleep is top tier youtube 👌
/r/MensRights23/10/23 05:58 PM
15

These Ideologues are desperate to project their ideology on everything without realizing it can't even exist outside of civilized society...
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/23 07:10 PM
0

I think they very much do (at least here in europe). Women and men just have different behavioural patterns on 'what a move is'.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 05:23 AM
30

My Number one driver into the right wing was feminist bigotry. Personally, for me feminism is a no go and as Long as left wing parties align with it, i can't vote for them. Fummy enough, feminism shares many characteristics with classic right wing dogmas so at this point, it doesn't even make sense being labelled left, yet still the left Parties in europe align with it (probably because of voter base)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/23 07:43 PM
11

It happened and guess what: they were praised....
/r/MensRights21/08/23 06:42 PM
14

Take my poor man's latinum for star trek reference : 🏅
/r/MensRights21/08/23 06:41 PM
12

Since Feminism is built on a dogmatic belief system, it basically is.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 10:15 PM
4

Just wanted to say this. Textbook example for manipulative graph. Also note that the y axis changes at 6x (steps change from 3x differences to 2x differences), further distorting the line. It makes the line look steeper.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 07:48 AM
60

Why are you surprised? Gay rights are men's rights after all, and the treatment of them, especially in non-western countries, is a huge issue.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 09:43 AM
13

I guess its one of the main driving forces to the right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/23 06:15 AM
5

I agree with everything you said, of course there are people who call themselves feminist, who don't subscribe to supremacy. But on the societal scale, all this occurs, it is hard to impossible to differ between the "bad" and "good" ones. This is similar to the talking point of rape culture, where they say, there are enough "bad" men to automatically assume any man as bad (the infamous toxic M&M bowl argument, if you're familiar to this). And I know those tactics are dirty, but the game is alrea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/23 07:46 AM
6

Yes, its a post about feminism, so I thought it was self explaining that this refered to feminism. And you're right, it somehow resembles certain feminist talking points, but as I said, we can't win when we don't use such tactics. You don't need to prescribe a definition for this. What I meant is the fact that there are feminists (of all branches) who are actively advocating bigotry, the "perpetrators" , and those who call themselves feminist (of all branches) and are interested in true gender e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/23 07:06 AM
6

Can't give you an exact number for me, but in my Rl discussions nearly always, just once it happened to me that a discussion partner (who also is a member of my universities Student council, unfortunately) kept her position. Probably, also because she profits from feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/23 05:29 PM
23

I think we can't win this discussion if we don't accept that there are only collaborators and perpetrators, no in between. By this, I mean that the perpetrators ("powerful" feminists) are backed by the equality feminists. So, even if the equality ones are not the radicals, the radicals in power couldn't exist without the equality feminists, thus they are equally as responisble for the mess. So, in RL discussions (at uni or with friends), I always use statistics and show the feminists, what they …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/23 03:48 PM
3

Think before you sleep has some really good content! There is a small Youtuber named Galileos Telescope, who has done an excellent series about Feminism (he called it "The little pink book" , example: https://youtu.be/-6N-wdMu7J0 ) which I can only recommend.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 12:35 PM
59

For some it already is. There is a subgroup of feminists, who claim that all penetration is rape, everytime. Probably lesbians, or desperados who never had good sex with a men🤷
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/22 02:33 PM
16

Men/boys in gaming are hostile to everyone lol
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:19 AM
36

It may surprise you but people are hostile to other people they don't want to join their activities or groups. Women are also hostile to PEOPLE (men and women), as men are. Jesus, you are delusional if you think only men are hostile.... Personally, the most evil acts of hostility, I've witnessed were from women to other women....
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:14 AM
2

Sydney Watson, Misha Petrov, ShoeOnHead, but they don't focus on feminism anymore as much as other things. Unfortunately, they all are pretty conservative.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 12:38 PM
4

Hopefully. It would be single greatest invention for men's rights, a technology that would make men truly Independent, since it does the one single thing, men literally can't do themselves. And regarding the natural growth of an unborn, since its a controlled environment, it even has a few advantages: while simulating a natural growth, its free from toxic city fumes, alcohol, cigarettes, drugs, bad diet, accidents etc. Surely will change gender dynamics when its finished.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/22 06:37 AM
2

All of this can be simulated in an artificial womb. In including sounds, movements, light, pathogens etc ... There are already some prototypes for animals. Probably it gets illegalized, many people are rather terrified by this idea, but its the future.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/22 06:27 AM
15

If I remember correctly, it was denmark
/r/MensRights24/10/22 10:52 AM
16

This is the feminist Paradoxon. Basically women should be seen as strong and independent when reviewing them, but they still need more morenfunding, scholarships and qoutas than men, which implies the contrary. Makes me think what that paints for a picture for high achieving people in general. It is rationalzied by invisible and not quantifiable "barriers" they face , which men don't have.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:14 PM
5

Good Bot
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:08 PM
6

A Kafkatrap can be countered with another one, here : Ex: Sound more like your ego is hurt by me being not hurt. Then just quit the conversation
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/22 09:13 AM
3

Let's see....monopolistic approach to truth....unfalsifiable pillars to lean and inability to deal with criticism without those pillars....harsh treatment/cancellation of enemies. Its unequivocally a dogma.
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/22 09:41 AM
9

Im pretty sure, the users of 4chan would also say sth like that if the genders where flipped^
/r/MensRights23/09/22 07:27 PM
10

There is so much wrong with this. In the first paragraphs, you are victim blaming men, which regarding some later paragraphs, shows that you have huge double standards and are not capable of reviewing men's struggles (and Misandry) without huge bias. Also there is a lot of projection going on here later. Men dying far more often at work is of course an MR-issue, regarding work place safety at jobs men are often forced into doing. A false rape accusation is, by objective measures far worse than a…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 10:04 PM
13

I don't agree with everything he says, for instance his stance on public healthcare or capitalism, but most of his videos are extremely well researched and articulated, especially on the social issues. Also, he teaches people how to spot and handle abusers, which personally helped me a lot in recent years.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:50 PM
1

Seems more like media editors are getting more desperate.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 08:20 AM
9

Gamma Bias at work🤷
/r/MensRights23/03/22 10:53 AM
42

Social Media. Imagine being a standard looking young woman, uploading a pic every now and then. My ex recieved about 100 messages a day on instagram basically just for existing and uploading semi nude pictures. People always validated her political opinions, no matter how stupid and unworldly. So of course, you will develop a sense of entitlement (and think you are always right). I guess thats the experience of most young women on social media 🤷
/r/MensRights23/03/22 10:51 AM
21

Very wise, indeed. No point in getting miserable about miserable internet strangers.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 11:15 AM
4

Based and Based and Heinlein pilled pilled
/r/MensRights10/03/22 09:35 AM
3

Source?
/r/MensRights04/03/22 02:46 PM
6

Spreading awareness is probably the best you can do (except you have a lot of money ). As men are usually being taken more seriously when talking about technical matters, women are usually being taken more seriously when its about social matters. So when you share your perspectivesto other people, you ultimately could reach alot when the also start to share etc. (a chain reaction).
/r/MensRights04/03/22 01:33 PM
12

Tgis, my friend, is the perfect exemplification of cognitive dissonance. And people who fall for it will get angry if you point this out. All sorts of emotional arguing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/22 10:39 PM
66

You can show this to anyone who claims that women don't lie about sexual assault and violence.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/22 08:45 AM
21

Its also sad how for a lot of people, soldiers lives are worth less. More than often I have heard the 'at least those casualities were only soldiers'. No, over a lot of History, those were young men who were forced to fight, and didn't want to be there at all. Also shows, how male lives are dehumanized when its convenient.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/22 05:21 PM
15

This should really get more research, it explains a lot of what is going wrong at the moment. I would go as far as to suppose that everyone here had a multiple real life interactions with people acting out on those bias. Unfortunately, many researchers in the social sciences, who create peer reviewed studies will be afraid of this, or even deem it sexist, since they clearly act out on these bias as well . Its basically a scientific way to call out 'simping', which all (even the people who don't …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/22 05:16 PM
25

Queens were more likely to start aggressive wars than men between 15 and 20th centuries. There are a variety of reasons including gender norms. Source: https://www.nber.org/papers/w23337
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:21 PM
3

It does "young men who aren't attaching to work, school and relationships" , this is effectively what walking away is describing for some. And I think, fear is good. The more people fear these guys, the more will ask why the are like that. Hopefully
/r/MensRights19/10/21 12:31 AM
4

I never said anything about hate. I meant it more as the notion "walking away from the planatation is the best thing you can do to flee from slavery" which seems commonly accepted by MGTOW. If enough men walk away, society is forced to change for the better.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 12:03 AM
61

Isn't this basically what MGTOW already said, just butthurt about it? I'd be offended about this article, but perceive its publication rather as a victory. It shows that MGTOW are succeding.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 04:43 PM
1

Good bot
/r/MensRights13/10/21 12:27 PM
22

"abusive, coercive and controlling" , says the psycho who stabbed and acted about it like it was nothing. I hope the jury sees through this bullshit...
/r/MensRights12/10/21 12:26 PM
108

This is a common gaslighting tactic of feminazis. You could try to just play her game and turn historical sexism against women into benevolence: women weren't allowed to work because they were seen as more valuable and shouldn't risk themselves endanger themselves by going outside (back then it was always and nearly everywhere dangerous) and waste their time with downpulling work, but rather stay in safezy and comfort home (which isbpartly true - as her draft counter argument). Point out the par…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:59 PM
5

Its actually again a good example for how certain "malicious" girl power mindsets have a lot in common with racist's mindsets.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/21 03:38 PM
292

Additionaly to what was already said: Many Universities offer women-only positions in internships, post-doc positions, Research Jobs etc. which make it harder for men to get into such positions, same for many companies in the industry Many teachers have bias favouring women in school (don't have the source at hand, but you can find it yourself pretty easy) Men actually have less options for "designing" their way of life, because societal expectations for them usually don't include being a "stay …
/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:41 PM
2

Another example of how feminism has become a tool for rich women to gain power....
/r/MensRights30/08/21 05:41 AM
23

The whole concept of political feminism is built on a condescending victim(ization) complex. In my country, there are a lot of laws which imply women's fragility in the name of empowerment...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 08:18 PM
2

Well of course, but I wouldn't declare Dr. Peterson as youtuber but more as professor XD I also understand why this notion is so disputed. While you need to take a lot of things "think before you sleep" says with a grain of salt (he's certainly bitter) , he sure speaks solid logic in some aspects. Wish, I had known some things he suggested in previous relationships (before them), because at least for me personally, some of his predictions were pretty accurate (for instance regarding excessive ta…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/21 05:54 AM
14

Mechanical Engineering is on of the, if not the hardest Engeneering Subject at the university I study at, and they also have a very little amount of women. I think, its more of an interest thing however. Chem Engineering also is very hard, and has nearly a 50/50 Split.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 10:10 AM
2

And then everyone wonders about "toxic masculinity"
/r/MensRights22/07/21 06:15 AM
4

As someone from Austria I appreciate that you care. The fact that it still exists here is pretty ironic in my opinion.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 09:43 AM
13

He is one of the most intelligent, well articulated Youtubers out there, you should give it a try
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/21 06:35 AM
4

I wouldn't even say MGTOW means not to date, just not to marry, as long as laws don't change, having healthy and reasonable boundaries in relationships (like don't let yourself be used for sth. ) , or having a healthy work/life balance.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:54 PM
6

Both the photos speak volumes about who is the real victim in the situation
/r/MensRights30/06/21 05:04 PM
4

Wrong, fgm wouldn't stop a rape... it makes sexual satisfaction impossible
/r/MensRights14/06/21 05:06 AM
2

Maybe people who do it like you don't go into the stats, but its surely not the average, so you can be happy about that XD
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/21 01:43 PM
15

Its however not the norm. Average monthly income of users is 180$, and if you earn more than 500$, you are in the top 3%. Most don't even make 50 a month, so it is really not the mint it is portrayed as (this is for onlyfans, but is true for all online sexual marketing if you continue reasearch)
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/21 08:07 AM
2

Yes it made sense in the past, since it was better to just send a few persons on the 1 month journey to the capital for the election than the complete ballot, but nowadays, it blocks progress for little parties, since its impossible for them to grow, but the powerful in the government, dems and reps profit pf it, so i doubt it will change. Direct democracy is the only fair choice.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:53 PM
1

Wow one thing we agree with XD
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:43 PM
6

I wouldnt say its man women, because it can also include mm or ww
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:42 PM
5

Also your complete election system was never updated since the founding timed, and is still at the same level of progress...
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:42 PM
1

A lot of laws, also like gun laws, climate laws and a whole lot more but also regarding age of consent...
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:40 PM
5

Not all people live in the US. As I said, where I live, age of consent is 16, and 16 year old guys already can give consent, its just US lawmakers who think the can't...
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:39 PM
4

Itd a crime in US, with its backwards laws...
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:37 PM
3

But if you want my opinion, I think its gross, from both sides...
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:36 PM
7

I never said what i think about that, just that you should let consenting people do what they want, you are extremely condescending and probably don't even notice..
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:36 PM
1

Pedophilia means the love of prepubescent people, you think it means the love of much younger people but thats simply not true, you would need another Word for that...
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:34 PM
5

Yes, it is by definition no pedophilia, read my comment again and if you still don't get it read the definition of pedophilia and child....
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:33 PM
7

Of course its about money, but good for them that they have this opportunity, other people would kill for such an insane amount
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:32 PM
3

I wrote 16...the only one embarrissing is you, and also condescending, when the relationship is consentual, why forbid , honestly, let people do what they want ....
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:30 PM
7

Pedophilia explicity means the love of children in old greek. The age limit for the definition of being a child is 14 years, after that you are juvenile until 18. So this is not exactly pedophilia. Also, i think its pretty condescending to dispute a physical/romantical relationship between to consenting people, just because it doesn't align with your worldview. In my country, age of consent is 16 years, and thats good as it is. Also, this goes both ways: In my country, a celebrety multimillionai…
/r/MensRights27/05/21 04:26 PM
15

This is actually a huge victory for male rights. I hope this law gets established well. I guess the feminists are screaming agsinst it^
/r/MensRights26/05/21 03:45 PM
3

I know you posted this in good faith, but its somehow the wrong place for following reasons: there is already a movement out there advocating women's interest. This movement has representatives around the west, they are in schools, unis, instititutions, media and even governments, and they inform the public about such events. Now, they claim to be all for equality, but when was the last time, you saw a feminist talking publically about relevant male issues in government or media? So when you dis…
/r/MensRights26/05/21 07:36 AM
1

I think neither of is 100% accurate. There are surely a lot of women who enjoy a situation like this ,and a lot of men who don't.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 10:20 PM
10

13 was also ca. The year i started noticing that in school (im 20 now). Its good when you notice that and try to not be like this. But also remember that the girls themselves are not responisble for being treated like that, those are simps, old men and the femi sisterhood. Build yourself up, and soon you will be the first in line. Get a good degree, and when you enter industry, your voice will be worth more. Most girls of that age are not conscious about their privilege, but you can talk with yo…
/r/MensRights20/05/21 02:46 PM
11

Exaxtly! The existence of this battle cry is proof alone of the feminist hypocrysy. Not because of the meaning but the term itself. Feminists ban words because they could be offensive to women, but when millions of men say, something is truly offensive to them, they get labeled fragile....
/r/MensRights19/05/21 04:42 PM
1

I really like the comparison, because it fits on multiple levels.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 03:54 PM
3

Probably just a ban :/
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:50 AM
48

I wish the members of twoX wouldn't be so gutless and actually engage in a discussion, but of course they just delete so they don't have to even think outside their bubble. Cowards....
/r/MensRights15/04/21 10:42 AM
4

So, I also think its important to call out truly sexist stuff, since it helps nobody, it pushes away genuine people, damage the content of this sub and is just hypocritical and stupid to read. So, when I have time, I call those out on this sub as well, and I often times have seen other members calling it out as well here. So, I know that this comment was a joke, since it reffered to the famous and often repeated sentiment, that behind every strong man is a strong women, which, you must admit, is…
/r/MensRights19/03/21 02:02 PM
7

I am no lawyer and don't know where you live, but some things i have heard from divorce battles is that sometimes men intentionally quit the job or work less to shrink the alimony, but most often the court recognizes that and doesn't change the payment. But I think, that maybe you could argue the equivalent of that in the court: say that she is capable of working and quit the job intentionally to receive higher payment, the court should recognize that. Also mention that when she doesn't work any…
/r/MensRights19/03/21 01:23 PM
16

Tbh, twox is also full of occassional man hating and I am sure many users don't support that man hating. Its the same here - there are haters and people genuinely interested in equality. If i visit twox as an outsider, it pretty much looks like the female Version of an incel sub. Last time I went there, the first post I clocked on was a woman talking about how she sees man only as subhuman (and it was seriously meant, no sarcasm and not meant as a joke) . She had multiple 100 upvotes. In the com…
/r/MensRights19/03/21 01:07 PM
2

Congratulations on your majors, must have been a hell lot of work to get there where you are. Also, Its good to hear that you have a diploma in teaching, since my equivalent way into the male rights sentiment was caused by High School teachers, who unrelatedly injected feminist theory into their classes at every possible occassion. While I hope, that male advocacy will not be pushed into the tabula rasa of the children, i am still glad that there are also teachers on our side.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/21 06:51 AM
1

Thank you so much for sharing, this is much better than the political compass, a 4 dimensional Test, truly unique :D
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 11:09 PM
1

I totally agree. Both political wings are so diverse that I would even dare to say that the definitions of those wings (eg the 1 Dimensional spectrum ) are not enough anymore to describe political orientations, we would need a 2D plane to fit everything the people hold into a system that fits everything, at least in my opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 10:31 PM
1

I still find the poll interesting, when I find the time (pretty busy at the moment because of university) , but i will try to remake it, i try to get into the poll system first.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 10:24 PM
17

Thank you. It is well formulated, and everybody with at least a spark of empathy will get it. I hope some reasonable people will be reached by this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 09:27 PM
2

The said notorious moderator (we arent allowed to call his name here) but most people who wanted to have a fruitful discussion in good faith were simply blocked by him on one of his subs without any reason. I just say he likes circles and is a jerk, remember these two words and you will find him sooner or later....
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 08:44 PM
3

Wow, you are reading my mind arent you ? I often had discussions with feminists about historical oppression of women, which in my opinion is bogus - their arguments are things like : women were property and treated like cattle, they were denied education, they couldn't decide for themselves - and the fun fact is, it was the same for men in europe. In medieval europe, there were peasants and Nobles, and the peasants were property of the nobles , men and women. The men had the exactly the same res…
/r/MensRights18/03/21 07:54 AM
4

Yeah, I think this misinformation also harms girls, because it scares them - also like the wage gap, once in a casual conversation with a (female) friend at uni, she mentioned that she so or so will earn less for the same work, which by now everyone should now is simply not true, but when she will put less effort into it, then of course it will come true and so a self fullfilling prophecy, its sad - same with the everman case. I dont live in england, but central europe, and here in the media, th…
/r/MensRights18/03/21 07:19 AM
11

Its actually exactly the reason they earned themselves the title Feminazi, and they still can't comprehend, why. While i think, the poster of the the above image had genuinily good intent (she says she also supports men), she uses misleading statistics. Thats the danger from the vocal Radfems, because they circulate these stats into the population.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 06:53 AM
27

I hate this guy so much (or maybe its a feminist woman just disguised, you never know 🤷‍♂️). This admin hinders so much useful convo. This moderatoe is for sure more interested in female supremacy than in male equality
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 09:21 PM
12

Props to you for being so polite asking if crossposting is okay. Really shows that decency is on our side :)
/r/MensRights17/03/21 05:33 PM
2

Thanks Im an idiot for forgetting that XD
/r/MensRights16/03/21 05:25 PM
4

To calculate percentage, you divide the quantity of the set you want to look at, ald divide it by the compmete set and mulitply that by 100. An example: you have a bowl of different fruits (3 apples, 6 bananas and 10 strawberries) and you want to get the numerical percentage of your apples, so you calculate (3 apples)÷(6+10) = 0.1875 and then times 100 = 18.75 % Usually this is done with greater samplesize and more complex questions but the principle stays the same
/r/MensRights16/03/21 06:58 AM
11

UN Women is one of the biased organisations out there. They and the OECD often circulate polls with extremely ome sided series of questions. I once partook in a study about {domestic} work. It counted things like cooking, gardening and playing with the kids, so things most people enjoy doing, as unpaid work, but repairing, Computer maintenance and transporting and such stuff was not even listed in the questions. It also listed "bringing and taking the kids to/from daycare" , but the time lost to…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:29 AM
3

Even if there are more men in power, that doesn't mean the laws are tailored to men, they are tailored to voters.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 09:21 PM
0

Think before you sleep is one of the best and most nuanced youtubers out ther, and I love him, great content, but he himself made an apology for his video about roma army, it was just a long text. Now, I neither know about not watch roma armies content, but you should really look for this apology of tbys, in this he described that her content still has far more positive impact than you would expect, in his typically well thought out and explainative manner (even of it was only written).
/r/MensRights23/02/21 09:09 PM
1

So, and now read your list again, and think about what you wrote, because nearly every single one of your points is more nuanced than you described them, like a double edged sword. I will randomly pick some points (I could do the entire list, but i don't have much time, need to get to work): Repdroduction Burden: while its true that we don't have the burden, we also don't have the security of reproduction, we cannot bear children and thus can never be sure if the children are ours. Paternity fra…
/r/MensRights18/02/21 05:52 AM
3

Finally a good Discussion on Menslib , thats a surprise!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/21 05:30 AM
2

If it wasn't full of bias, it could be helpfull to solve gender specific problems of both men and women. It could be helpful to explore why men are pressed into criminality so often, or why women are pushed into making decisions they regret in their later life so often. And the knowledge could be transfered to other fields like psychology and medicine. The status qou is the contrary, unfortunately. It more or less enforces bad decisions.... it could be a really informative and interesting field,…
/r/MensRights16/02/21 09:34 PM
29

I once was in an argument like this with a female collegue, and answered exactly like you described yourself: a self induced, non justifiable fear is not more of a problem than actual victimisation to real violence, which men happen to fall victim to more often. I could figuartively hear the gears of her brain working, trying to come up with an answer, but she couldn't find one, she then looked up crime stats of our country and finally agreed. Its sad that people fall so easily to this mindset, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/21 04:15 PM
126

Absolutely disgusting (and somehow terrifying) piece of manipulation: Firstly, they use an artsy and simplistic theme, to gather the attention from young people and gain a sense of 'officiality' Then they use misleading statistics, like 60% of female journalists receive harrassment, which doesn't show a ratio, while the male journalists receive roughly the same amount, then portray it as a gendered issue (it isn't) Then they cite the OECD study, which counted cooking and caring as work, but thin…
/r/MensRights22/01/21 12:34 PM
5

Depends on where you live. I recommend for the sources, use google , type 'womens rights [location] [timeframe] ' , you will probably find enough credible sources with that
/r/MensRights19/01/21 02:49 PM
1

That is a very interesting perspective, thank you!
/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:26 PM
4

Toxic femininity is also a thing though. Its also been researched. Described as actions and thoughts forcefully holding back women (so basically equivalent to toxic m. ). It manifests as stuff like the 'popular'girls at school bullying and ridiculing a girl because she is not beautiful enough/too shy in the eyes of the bullies. Spreading bad rumors, turning teachers, classmates or authority in general against them in the course of their actions. And as toxic masculinity, its consequences can als…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 12:30 PM
1

Especially because men have just as many female ancestors as women, so, the justification is pretty pointless since we also should get reparstions for our mistreated ancestors...
/r/MensRights15/01/21 07:55 PM
3

"I understand that men have been labelled as the perpetrators when it comes to domestic violence. When it happens the other way round, the society is not ready to listen to you" Very true unfortunately. Today, just talked with a friend about exactly this, and he is generally egalitarist, but he simply doesn't believe that DV also happens to men, despite all the scientific evidence (and personal experience), he came up with excuses, like "a lot of women don't come forward and are not counted" (as…
/r/MensRights15/01/21 07:52 PM
2

You could argue that MRA try to improve the life of their sons, brothers, fathers, and male friends, thus improving the quality of live in their surrounding. Also we generally believe in women's agency, so we probably have a higher image of women than some feminists. The rest already has been sad, we don't need to do things for women, since they have feminism, a complete field of studies and many public and private institutions dedicated in the west.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 12:51 AM
9

Well, thats the point. Supporting a movement doesn't meam agreeing woth everything, especially when you don't know about everything. Its not only black and white. Especially when political propaganda comes into play. Most people sheeply believe what daddy government tells them, no matter how easily refutable it is, and turn deaf when someone challenges that. Thats why i like the nazi argument, Because it quickly shows people how wrong a state can be. When you are a girl, and you notice you get s…
/r/MensRights13/01/21 06:43 PM
5

I think OP is truly interested in equality. Its maybe a bit harsh comparison, but in ww2 in germany, most citizens and soldiers had no idea what really was going on in the camps like auschwitz, still considered themselves nazis, but would never support the genocide, they just wanted to have a strong germany (which is legitimate in my opinion) adter ww1. They were still despised by the enemy. There really are parallels to feminists, thats probably why the radicals are referred to as feminazis.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 06:17 PM
10

Considering what feminists did with the law in my country (retirement, pension and work laws favouring women, social service only for mem, reproductive rights only for women, judical laws favouring women, all literal and lawfully written down official priviliges of women), while ironically claiming, women are discriminated by the state, and getting people to believe it, just to get female votes of people who beöieve without further investigation what is told them by authority, I can hardly belie…
/r/MensRights13/01/21 05:53 PM
1

The pink tax argument implies that women are incapable of making financial consumer decision, thus taking away their agency - I know that feminists love to take away womens accountability, but just imagine for a second: there is a blue bike and and a pink bike, the latter costs 10% more and both have a price tag, so when a women sees them both, she will evaluate which productd fits her needs and her taste better, and how much she is willing to pay for each product. If she decides to pay a bit mo…
/r/MensRights13/01/21 11:47 AM
6

Hmm,i guess it depends on country, where i live its less of an industrial thing (its begann over the last 3,4 years), but more of a political: our strongest party ,about the last 100 years, most of the time was the left wing working class party, but due to very bad financial and immigration policies over the last 30ish years, they lost the support especially of working class men to right wing parties, because, as main breadwinners, tax payers, and also strongest recipients of the large rise of v…
/r/MensRights12/01/21 11:25 PM
3

The problem is that these sources get read by a lot of peopme, including young men and women. For young men, this is dangerous for their mental health, and young women could develop a certain sense of entitlement. I also doubt that the described actions will be carried out, but the mainstreaming and plattforming of such opinions are probably one of the main reasons for the success of misandric media and policy, for instance this famous tiktok, where a young girl celebrated male extinction and go…
/r/MensRights12/01/21 04:28 PM
10

Because , on contrary to KKK or Nazis, these opinions get a platform on famous international news sites, like the guardian, the ny times or the independent. And most people usually instantly believe without doubt and question, what they read in such sources. Thats the problem.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 10:40 AM
5

It scares me that people like the one you were debating run around, thinking they ruled every argument with their flawed logic and spreading pseudoscientific facts, which further misinforms more people to this untruth.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 03:02 PM
3

I know the literature, and it points out how large the difference in earnings between men and women is. Not how it is caused or why it is this number. And that is the problem, these numbers don't really mean much more than the difference in earnings. It doesn't account for years worked for the same company or how often it was asked for a raise. The key is that adults have agency. They sign the working contract, and their pay raises. To interpret some sort of globally organized lessening of women…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 02:48 PM
1

Interesting discussion and I also thought a lot about it, but without proper studies, with large sample sizes, I wouldn't dare to claim anything. There can be made all types of arguments, evolutionary, culturally, socially, or even anecdotes, which will lead to different hypotheses. But its a pretty fussy topic for researchers.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 12:10 PM
21

A part of probably because interests mutually exclude each other's: For instance, Feminists want women quotas, while most reasonably people despise this Feminists also continue to push scientifical dishonesty, like the wage gap, and when the fallacies are cuontered with facts, the answers are usually punchlines, like the wage gap punchline with the female laywers, female doctors etc., which of course is just nonsense, this makes my blood boil for instance. Some people think, a peaceful way out o…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 11:42 AM
1

I always say, that men the same number of female ancestors as they have, so halv of the reparations go to them^
/r/MensRights04/01/21 10:03 AM
2

Hey, I'm collecting all differents kinds of sources (research papers, gov. Statistics from different nations etc. ) , and am looking for sources for the net tax argument, do you have any links for stats ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/21 09:43 AM
3

I will use this !
/r/MensRights26/12/20 05:55 AM
6

Me too, but i have a slight feeling that many women will oppose this. Two of my ex-gf's were highly critical of it. So I started to portray it as an advantage to women, since they don't need to go through pregnancy and birth, and could focus on their career instead. However, personally I don't want neither women nor men to end, I everyone wishing any of these must be pretty terrible.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 09:00 PM
9

Dealing with Misandry is dependant on the situation. In your case, you could've countered with artificial uterus, which will render women obsolete, which on the one hand is technically more demanding than artificial sperm, on the other hand, its far safer and healthier for the unborn, since its 100% controllable (no toxins from environment, no kinetic impacts from outside, perfect temp and environment regulation etc. ) Its actually researched, and there is some success, but not complete .
/r/MensRights25/12/20 08:40 PM
1

This is essentially why men should never marry, and in some countries even never cohabit...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/20 09:14 PM
3

I agree with you that OP had weak examples for his claims, his core statement remains factual. Note that when we talk about feminists, we don't care about the moderates sitting at home, we care about the political, and academic class of feminists. Those who impose laws, direct funds and oppose progress, the ones who support the Duluth model and support laws which exclude men from definitions of rape. They, very often, engage in conspiracy mentality. The idea that men as a whole set up a system w…
/r/MensRights22/12/20 11:44 AM
11

Tagging is actually an extremely good idea by you. I will start tagging the stat arounf my city. If enough people did this, it could gsin serious media attention. If not , its still fun to do it with friends :P
/r/MensRights21/12/20 11:25 PM
8

Well ,you are right, unfortunately, many arguments against feminism center around continuing the discussion with feminisms own tacitcs. This is because many feminist arguments are actual "non-arguments", which easily can be twisted by adjusting the wording: Women were opressed, because they were forced to stay at home -men were oppressed because they were forced to go out Women just were incubators-men just were work donkeys Women are objectified for their body - men are objectified by their ass…
/r/MensRights21/12/20 11:21 PM
1

Well he's right, tho. This is not a gendered issue, but OP made one of it. Being violent (physically and psychological) is not a matter of strength, but a matter of readiness to use it. And its proven by studies that this readiness is equally distributed between the sexes. A difference in strength can easily be overcome by use of weapon, ruse or authority. So, while the previous commenter may reacted childish, his core message was true. While the fear of women is publically recognized, by societ…
/r/seduction21/12/20 11:09 PM
12

Well, there are toxic people, but because men and women are perceived differently, toxicity also tends to manifest differently in them. Look at school bullies, the rawest and earlierst expression of toxicity: men tend to isolate by (threat of) violence, women by (in)directly spreading verbal abuse. Of course, those are stereotypes, but they both have their roots. The problem with toxic masculinity is that use of this word is exaggerated , and the word's use overly motivated by these pseudo acade…
/r/MensRights21/12/20 10:28 PM
42

This is actually a really good qoute 🤔
/r/MensRights21/12/20 10:04 PM
2

Its not condescending trying to prevent family members from making bad decisions, after all thats what family is for. Gender studies is a waste of time and money. Apart from being practically useless for further career options, its also unscientific. Many of the claims taught in this Pseudoscience are non-falsifiable (like its usually done byreligions), which takes away any scientific credibility and shows how ridiculous they are.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 08:37 PM
1

There are enough studies showing women learn language faster and having an easier time to adapt, this is science and the only laughable thing is you denying it. Also you misrepresent my reasoning. Its more like this: men have less energy and free time to do research, in addition to their jobs being less word lasting, thus lesd experiences in argumentation from their job, in general. Don't be like feminists and take generalities personal and as offense. Thats idiotic as hell... Also, stop denying…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 05:48 PM
0

It was an example for manual jobs....mens most practiced jobs are Vehicle technician, electric technician, plumber, welder, etc., the first scientific job is software engeneer at place 15...for women its nursing, secretary, teaching - not scientific but far more speaking lasting. And less exhausting work. Thats what i wad about. Science is not standard for men. Most men are not lucky enough to work in science. Its commonly known that women are better with words, as men are bodily stronger. there…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 04:58 PM
5

This is great, hopefully the creator of the original privilege list sees that!
/r/MensRights18/12/20 04:18 PM
2

Let me reformulate: who do you think will in general be more convincing in a discussion about rights: the 30h/week literature teacher, with 10 extra hours zo read, research and improve leisure skills, or the 40h/week plumber who often works overtime and is tired after a day of hard manual labour ? This is what i was reffering to. So its not nonsense, its just about representation of jobs and obligation by gender...
/r/MensRights18/12/20 04:10 PM
2

Well, of course MRA often are able to articulate themselves well, what I meant was on a broader spectrum in society, like since men tend to do more manual stuff etc., they are not as used to balance words and sentenced like people with an education/ studies,who are more used to formulate their thoughts and feelings into relatable sentences. Feminists often claim, we are some poor, uneducated alt right radicals, but in my experience, Mra are mostly from the most educated classes of men, like Doct…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 03:11 PM
2

Yeah, its somehow fucked. A few weeks ago, i saw a good post at the twoXChrompsomes sub, the guy essentially posted : "you don't get a handbook or learn in school how to behave asking girls out, so you need to figure out yourself. Of course, sometimes its awkward, but shaming that is evil. " Some people never manage to get over the shame on their sexuality, and the following repression will lead to depression. And even worse, the repressed people will get shamed even more. Some Other people get …
/r/MensRights18/12/20 01:07 PM
1

This. If its a truly mutual relationship, both people will be able to accept not letting the government in.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 12:51 PM
3

Thank you for your detailed work. Even if the fact they exist is depressing, its good to see that a lot of separate people from different places come to the same conclusions at the same time. Feminist myths often come from one source and get bigger and bigger in popularity, while we more or less grow together, thats our strength. I think a lot of men very well know about that, but are to afraid to speak up, but the more popularity we gain, the more man will take the dare. So its important that w…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 12:49 PM
16

-less likely to receive stranger violence -less likely to commit suicide -less likely to be prosecuted for sexual crimes (institutional) -in general, less harsh sentences for same crimes (institutional) -has all the reproductive rights and decisions(institutional) -enjoys entire global instituations exclusively campaigning for Womans rights (institutional) -more likely to receive sympathy/help by stranger -more likely to be hired for the same qualification in a prestige job (inst.) These are onl…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 11:08 AM
2

Cool, thank you :)
/r/MensRights18/12/20 11:00 AM
24

Maybe we should create a female privilege checklist on the sub.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 10:59 AM
2

Well, the total genome size of the Daphnia magna is 123 mb (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166445X19300396) The genome size of a human is (diploid) 6200 mb, so even if the fleas have more genes, they contain far less info.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 11:41 AM
3

Some are stupid, some are arrogant/narcissistic, some have mental health problems, others a financial interested, and then there are the ones who have been manipulated by those. Thats why you get banned so fast on every feminist subreddit, or even from non feminist events IRL, because when you speak logic, normal people will start to think. Thats why they hate Professor Peterson so much, because he is in a position they can't really do anything, and he's creating more femi apostates than anyone …
/r/MensRights17/12/20 10:55 AM
2

This is shameless inoctrination just for the sake of selling t shirts to other indpctrinated indoviduals. Who knows if the creators are really this opinion or just brainwashed the children for the money. Everything wrong with capitalism in one video (unfortunately).
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:09 PM
2

Would you post a summary of the discussion? Would be super interesting to see how that played out :)
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:01 PM
0

1) where I live, most women actually agree, they just don't really want to do anything about it since its convenient for them. Even then, the dating market has disadvantaged for women (those who want a relationship), in general you can say, its easier for women to get laid, but also easier for men to find a deep relationship. 2) well you are willing, but will never ge it so why waste thoughts?? Also, as a men you also have stronger muscle tissue, higher bone density, more nerve cells in your bra…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 10:37 AM
1

Well, i don't know were and how you live so i know that i can't assume shit, but you have internet so i assume you have a place to live, so as long as your basic needs are covered, theres always a possibility upwards. And i didn't mean that you were lazy. I just meant that worrying about stuff you can't control doesn't make much sense because you can't control it anyways. Only society as a whole can fix such problems. Since i have hardly any information about your situation i can only assume. An…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:22 AM
4

Of course, you shouldn't be completely blind to everything, i meant that focusing on this to the point your mental health suffers won t make anything better. I also was on this point, seeing every man-woman interaction through an ideological lens, and i know how much anger this creates, but when i realized that this anger only can lead to bitterness, i started separating my analytical thougts from my emotions, that clearly made it less tearing. Also, when your mind is healthy, you will have an e…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:05 AM
6

The most important thing is to not fall into a victim complex like feminists do! Suround yourself with people you can truly trust! Value good friendships! Use what you know about the current situation to navigate safely and avoid situstions in which you can get wrecked. Even though there is a lot of unfairness going on, with our knowledge we have far better cards than someone uninformed. Inform as many people as possible! Know women are not our enemy, a lot of them will agree if you have a hones…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:33 AM
3

The general tendency of women to be more likely of average (in a lot of areas) results from the XX - Gonosmomes: As every chromosome, the x is a sequence of genes (and other regulatory dna fragments). This gene sequence is always the same, only the Acid-Sequenced of the gene itself vary from person to person (or from x to x). So as you noted correctly, women have two x chromosomes, which gives the ability to correct a broken gene on the other x. Men also have one x, and thus all genes women have…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:12 AM
1

Well, me too, the thing is that its mostly practiced wirth no medical reason, and for us, we both don't know how our dicks would be without being circumcised. Research proved that s lot of sensitive nerve tissue is located in the foreskin, and that is missing. In my country, the law counts it as mutilation if you are tattoed without consent, and being circumcised has far more consequences as that, thats why I called it mutilation. Its equivalent to a labioplasty for women, and that is illegal in…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 12:25 PM
2

Christianity in europe was however also a catalyst for oppression, since Leaders used it to justify their position and their treatment of peasants, and the Church uses it to extract as much money as possible.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 08:08 AM
1

Especially Non medical circumcision (also religious, but in europe and us many circumcisions without any reason at all are practiced) , and regarding phimosis treatment, if some research was put into that, circumcision wouldn't be necessary.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 08:06 AM
16

On point. Especially the establishment of the 3rd one was feminisms largest sucess (in europe). It is true, however it is also true for the men in ancient times. When you were not born noble, you were not considered a person, neither men nor women. That was just the way back then.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 07:22 PM
1

Well tldr, The first one was about feminism turning women against men by spreading half-truths and misrepresented stats (with popular examples), thus creating an environment of distrust etc, The one about circumcision, That its beyond absurd that circumcision doesn't count as mutilation, since its a permanent, medically unnecessary operation on an infant, that can't consent, when in most countries even things like tattoing without consent count as mutilation.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 07:03 PM
1

We talked about circumcision on another post, I referred to that. In this post, I was talking about circumcision, reffering to it as multilation, you said it is not multilation because its not like the FGM in countries it is practiced. However, FGM is illegal in US and Europe, I focused on the problems in Europe, and MGM is a far larger problem in Europe (and before you say again that Circumcision isnt Mutilation, it is, far less significant acts on ones body against consent are seen as mutialti…
/r/MensRights08/12/20 02:17 AM
1

First of all, I mever talk about the US, also i can't speak about women's and men's issues in the US when it suits me, but you can speak about women's issues in countries like Saudi Arabis when it suitd you (for instance in our discussion about circumcision ) ? Not very balanced... So, you claim that we deny history, but actually its the other way round. Everyone knows that women in europe had less rights than men, however they very also free of any judical dutied. When they did a crime, it was …
/r/MensRights05/12/20 10:07 AM
1

Well, when that means that someone more qualified gets left out, thats critical. In fields like med or certain engeneering subjects, that decides sometimes about death or alive. I wouldn't want to have a surgery from someone, walk on a bridge or live close to a powerplant that was constructed by someone who wouldn't be in this position without the help of affirmative action.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 04:08 PM
1

Well then you know exactly how that feels. Don't you agree, that this is something that should be noticed ? Its unfair,no matter whom it happens. You should despise, whoever established this policy. In my case, it was a feminist organisation, and it happens in other fields,too. Of course we fight against that.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 03:43 PM
1

Thats a matter of definitiom. Lets say, there are 10 scholarships, gender neutral, and you receive the 9th one (on the appliance test score). Now, the uni decides that 2 of those scholarships get established as women only. Now the scholarship gets transferred from you to someone who oroginally scored less than the 10th place, but happens to be a woman. Happens in my country, for instance our med uni, who requires partaking in an entrance test, where the score is not the same for men as women, so…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 03:33 PM
1

Both can be traumatizing when they result in a situation that endanger ones existence (imagine you sre in your last semester of studied and lose scholsrship then, all the time and work invested suddenly worthless). And even if it is not traumatizing, its not a comfortable situations to be in. Feminists were fighting for eliminating such situations for women more and more, but It also gets more and more confounded with setting up more barriers for men. And yes, I never said that women aren't forc…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 02:56 PM
5

Funny, i also wanted to post about this thread, but you were faster :P I think, she is not a bad person, her problem is that she always uses her traumatic experiences with her family as justification for her beliefs, but , sometimes in the very same comment, denies men the same right. She often comes here to discuss, but never really listen to us sharing our experiences, so that it boils down to "in the end its misogyny that also harms men", which certainly isnt true. She also beliefs in the neo…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 12:55 PM
1

So, I've followed your discussion a lot, and while there are a lot of spoken truths, much of your views, many of them also stem from a certain inability tp emphasize with out-of-your group members. You say that all these women's only programms are there to bring women equality, the correct word however is equity. Women have all the rights they need to get into High Paying Jobs (through education, also note i don' talk about the US, where I live, Uni is free) , they just happen to prefer other th…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 12:36 PM
6

You are right, there are some bullshit posts here, but at least nothing gets banned, everyone can partake on the discussion, and the bullshit most of the time gets called out, no one gets banned. Thats the only way to form a community which can grow and hold itself accountable. On the contrary, on r/Feminism you get banned after pointing out that 'Men are trash'is a sexist statement. Such a thing won't happen here, when you post something like that it will get criticized, and the critics will ne…
/r/MensRights03/12/20 08:51 PM
2

Blaming global warming solely on men really is a joke. But yeah, femi "academics" will take everything that is against men. Like this scientific journal which fell for the hoax when some people sent in a rewritten version from Hitlers "Mein kampf" (they switched the word "jew" with "man" etc. ) and got accepted with excellence by the journal. Of course this is generally glossed over. And they wonder why they are called Feminazis, when they literally engage in the same rethorics nowaday...
/r/MensRights03/12/20 07:17 PM
5

The difference is that incels have hardly any power over anything,they are more of a joke, these liberal feminists are the most powerful group among feminism, influencing unis, govs and peoples minds.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 06:20 PM
1

This is not really of our business. Relationships are not ego trips were you can do things and expect your partner tp go along with it, and this goes for both parties, its honestly NTA. He sound like an idiot, especially in this case because salt is something whic easily can be added afterwards. Dumping him maybe a bit extreme, but in the end is her decision, and has nothing to do with misandry.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 05:11 PM
2

Okay sorry, had a long day. Michael moore once was a good producer, I wish he would look as deep into the bigotry of rich femi organisations like oecd, unhcr or similar, like he did into other topics, unfortionately he's blind to that (either was bought, or is already so spoiled through all his money that he really can't see)
/r/MensRights03/12/20 05:01 PM
19

You are probably better without them. Political feminism is the climax of male disposability, so anyone engaging in it probably (conciously or unconciously ) thinks men are worth less. If they wouldn't think like that, they wouldn't have cancelled a friendship about issiues that concern you. Dodged a bullet there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 04:56 PM
3

Thank you!!!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 04:52 PM
8

My goal is to get more active when I have my degree. Nobody csn take it away when its there, and I think now there are already enough employers (or later maybe my own company) that also know about the issue, but at university there is this consensus on agreeing on everything the femis say (hell, there is even a whole institute which dictates uni policies just focused on feminism, they can get you thrown out immediately) i don't want to lose that now. I hope i won't change my mind when i'm finish…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 04:51 PM
1

What i especially liked was the part in the beginning, about that there where far more evils committed by men, Because there also were far more men taking responsibility for something, and that society always focuses on the worst deeds by men while ignoring the best, and for women the other way round.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 04:41 PM
3

Have you read the article ? Its exactly about that, that men are held accountable for stuff they never did by society, while women are not held to the same standards. That women are seen as by default victim while men as by default evil,and how political feminists further enforce that instead of holding tp their dictionary definition. And about psycholical experiments (everything backed up by source) that prove that women are not the innocent angels society would like them to be. The caption is …
/r/MensRights03/12/20 04:35 PM
7

I never did :P
/r/MensRights02/12/20 10:06 PM
10

A lot of the policies that directly or indirectly are harmful to men were pushed for (over the last 70 years) by feminist organisations and institutions in the government. Another part comes from the expectations of society, or how feminists like to call it, toxic masculinity. Of course there is still more to that...
/r/MensRights02/12/20 09:46 PM
5

Props to you for working on your bias, and hope you are doing well, assault is awful, and i hope your attackers get what they deserve.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:30 PM
3

What did you expect ? Feminists either ignore or ban anything that doesn't fit their narrative, so that their blind sheep followers won't notice that they are manipulated.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:14 PM
14

Unfortunately, many feminists will disagree with you. Suzanna Danuta, director of Sexuality and Gender studies at NEU stated: We [women] have every right to hate you [men]. There are many well established professional feminists, who hold opinions like that. So, as a regular man without any sort of power, i ask you, whom should we listen to? The randomn internet stranger, claiming this is not feminism, or the established professional feminist, earning a ton of money and having a lot of influence …
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:12 PM
2

You need to prevent the view (which is a primary axiom of feminism) that women were always far worse of then men because of their gender roles, and the generel misrepresentation of historical facts. While women maybe were forced to stay home (generlly known) ,men were often times forced to go out (to war, or hard working ,generally known but never regarded in this discussion) While most (the non noble) women were denied education (known fact), most men (non noble or non clerical) also had no rig…
/r/MensRights02/12/20 06:19 PM
2

Well yes, but then again if the father is really abusive, no fault divorce is not necessary. No fault divorce makes it too easy for people to opt out of marriage, but a marriage is something that needs work on. For men, we always give the advice to gather as much evidence as possible (secretely) when facing abuse to make it easier in court. For women, it should be the same level of doubt.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 06:06 PM
1

For the voters, take this: https://cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/genderdiff.pdf and yes, this highly does influence the politicians, since they want to get voted, so they will turn their policies into the directions of the voters demographics. Also to you claiming, that there much more women victims of DV, here is an official source proving otherwise: https://www.thehotline.org/stakeholders/domestic-violence-statistics/ its not as much as women, but still enough to justify more …
/r/MensRights01/12/20 03:57 PM
1

So firstly, thank you for your replies. I know very well, that there is not this one big feminism, however you need to accept that there also isn't one big male rights movement, on the contrary. I have never even heard of Paul Elam, whoever that is, and on contrary to feminism, there aren't any big organisation or ministries spreading awareness and creating fundings for our cause, so the only way to communicate for us, is like here, on reddit. This is also, why national organisation and ministri…
/r/MensRights01/12/20 03:57 PM
2

Honors to you that you actually come here to discuss, and I think not every statement told to you was particulary fair or helpful, and your discussion was full of a lack of mutual understanding. I agree that its rightful for women to have the possibility of abortion, and that they fought hard for it, also that saving one up until marriage is not healthy (also not for the marriage). So you need to accept that while there of course are important issues regarding women, there is also a huge amount …
/r/MensRights01/12/20 02:58 AM
1

Your wife clearly is abusing you. The questions is if you have kids or not. If not, try to gather as much evidence as possible. Don't get caught doing that, you need to do it smart and sneaky. Get proof that the abuse is unjustified and arbitrary. Record incidents. Also gather evidence of possible mental health issues like borderline or bipolar depression which sometimes results in such behaviour. The problem is that you are married to this woman, so you are legally bound. If she were your girlf…
/r/MensRights30/11/20 09:34 PM
2

We all should use this as standard template and use a modified variation (adjusted to country and equvalent cases there ) for our social media feminist contacts.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 11:33 AM
2

Well , both on both sides, opposing women feared that they would also need to sign the draft, so they would rather not vote than going to the military. The suffragettes targeted sometimes certsin people, other Attacks were at randomn location like jihadi terror etc. They killed people in their attacks
/r/MensRights29/11/20 06:44 PM
2

Unfortunately, this is a truly evil mindset from them . I went through it, and would spare the younger men any time if i could, they will have enough hardships to deal with later in life . Luckily we dont have wars at least.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 06:17 PM
0

In a comment from op, he described it a bit, they did acts of terror like planting bombs against men who opposed their cause etc. It was more of a joke, honestly, but the suffragettes ultimately got theirbway, even more comfortable than they wished themselves, so maybe itd only way for us to be hears. Still dont want to go this way of there are alternatives.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 06:13 PM
2

So firstly, i didn't want to come over offended (Sorry if i did), and yes you are right, i live in austria. So, there pretty sure exist some men who enjoy the military, i have yet to meet them, everyone i talked about the draft at university has a very negative view of it, after all do militaries have a mindset of (this was actually said to conscripts) :" You have to give up your human rights to protect them for everyone else" . For the supposed necessity of our military from the gov , they woul…
/r/MensRights29/11/20 06:08 PM
2

Maybe the actual only way to solve this is by doing it like the suffragetes handled it in your prior descriptions. Maybe without such acts there will be no change, maybe thats the reason they did this :/
/r/MensRights29/11/20 02:16 PM
7

Well yeah you are right, but i didn't want to post this as a Suicide advice, just wanted to show that it is not that hard killing yourself, but the benzos are probably a far more comfortable options i guess XD
/r/MensRights29/11/20 09:53 AM
3

Killing oneself actually isnt hard (from a purely abstract perspective). What i mean is that if you really really want to die, its easy. If you dont want to be messy you buy five pacs of paracetamol, a single metogastron (to stop the body from vomiting the pills out again) and eat all pills or lie yourself into the bathub and cut open your arms, then slightly turning on the water so the blood gets washed instantly(sorry for slight morbidity). So those 3x more women attempting it either are so in…
/r/MensRights29/11/20 02:49 AM
2

Where i live, there is a draft of 6 monthy military or 9 months civil service (for instance helping out in hospitals etc. ) , you need to decide beforehand, if you dont its automatically military, and both are minimally paid, the military ~300€, civil service 600€, both by far not enough to make even basic paiments like rent, all the bills etc, military pays for food and "accomodation" (which partly are in worse condition than our homeless shelters). Luckily there are now wars, and hopefully non…
/r/MensRights29/11/20 02:16 AM
3

Reddit feminists probably belong to the most cognitive dissonant beeings on earth, among religious fundamentalists. How can someone not notice how strong ones own hypocrisy is?
/r/MensRights29/11/20 01:12 AM
7

I once tried to post there, describing how feminism directly harms men (proven with sources) it was removed for 'being about gender wars', another time, i made a post about how non medical circumcision is a (in the west) perfectly legal way of robbing infant men of their sexual body autonomy and harming their sexual organs for their whole life (im circumcised as well, so I dont want to offend anyone who also happens to be but is content with it, but practicing it on baby boys is just wrong and s…
/r/MensRights29/11/20 01:08 AM
2

In most countries, except from the us, men also weren't allowed to vote for the largest part of histroy . Were I live, the first election included men and women.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 03:09 AM
16

Your videos are great, not only the pink book ones, also the physics series, I hope for you that you can enlarge your audience, more people should watch the pink books !
/r/MensRights27/11/20 02:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter