TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Noxin__Nixon Archive

View 1 post and 1,026 comments by Noxin__Nixon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,026 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I don't do fat girls either. Yuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 11:34 PM
3

Kanye is a genius and probably the wokest man alive. LOL wow nevermind
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 04:07 PM
5

So in the end, why do the rappers choose to be around them? Because unlike you, millions of men don't give a shit about 'n-count'. Its a stupid thing to care about or waste time thinking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 04:05 PM
2

You really believe the majority of men are nothing more than uncontrollable hormone machines? I'd say the type of men you believe are the majority are actually around 20-25%
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 03:58 PM
6

Because high N count is not bad. Thats a stupid trp myth
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 02:50 PM
6

they ALWAYS want to fuck every hot girl they see. EVEN when they're already in a relationship. This is an absurd belief and far away from reality. I have no interest in fucking every hot girl even when I am not in a relationship. For instance boring vanilla girls I have no interest in even if society thinks they are a 10
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 02:48 PM
1

That belief is part of your problem
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 02:46 PM
3

1-8 is easy to find but they are usually serial monogamists so you have to just to be on alert all the time. 9) doesn't smoke weed or drink excessively (personally I hate alcohol). Here is your deal breaker. You want all of the above but you also want a religious guy that doesn't party. Good luck. You do realize that the cultures at most companies that employ college graduates in their 20s making over 60K/year have big party cultures right? Wall Street, Madison Avenue, Silicon Valley giants and …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 06:51 PM
1

Sounds like just a lot of your subjective opinions. Like you outright assert that "women with clean loving hearts are very, very rare" but provide nothing substantial to base that on other than I assume your personal experience, which doesn't mean anything to me. Just wondering though if you believe that men with "clean, loving hearts" are more common than women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 06:31 PM
1

Neither reveal "hate" for the other gender despite the flaws in both.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 04:39 PM
1

They don’t have the paternal gene. Well by definition this is wrong. Men wouldn't have a maternal gene if thats what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 04:37 PM
1

I'm not sure what your point is. I believe men can vet partners. The ideas that "only the top% of men that luxury" and that other men are incapable of vetting because of "their sex drive" are simply retarded opinions with no basis in fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 04:36 PM
1

I think you missed my point because I have no idea what post of mine this replies to
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 04:34 PM
2

No its not. Facts are needed for debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 11:24 PM
4

You do not even try to feel what men feel. I don't even try to feel what women feel and I definitely don't want a women wasting time trying to "feel what men feel". Sounds like some new agey bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 10:55 PM
1

Why not just support birth control and easy access to abortion if you are worried about too many single mothers?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 10:28 PM
1

Ok once you prove empirically that "men can't vet their partners" get back to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 10:12 PM
2

Is someone paying me to do that? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 06:58 PM
44

men can’t vet their partners because only the top % of men have that luxury and also because of their sex drive. Only an idiot would believe that
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 06:56 PM
1

Hawaiian surfers from 1905
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 02:23 AM
1

How do you feel about these guys bodies? http://www.surfingforlife.com/g/hist_b16.jpg The other thing I think some people are missing is that lift weights in the gym and all you get is muscles. But if you get your muscles from surfing like those guys you might be less defined but you also learn a bad ass skill like surfing that adds an additional element to confidence and sex appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 01:30 AM
2

If a man is out of work he has even more time to get fit
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 01:21 AM
1

I think it does because your overall point is what's true - you don't get some insanely buff body without dedicating huge amount of time to it and most American men could do with a lot more exercise in some form rather than less.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 01:14 AM
1

The body type that women say they prefer takes like a year or two of gym work. lol no it doesn't. There are plenty of natural body weight exercises that, in addition to sports are more than enough to achieve a fit body most woman prefer.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 12:37 AM
2

Say what? The worst thing about the whole online TRP is that it creates this false analogy that their narrow belief system is somehow equivalent to taking the Red Pill in the Matrix as if there are only two distinct ways to look at things. Nothing useful about the TRP is original or new. Tom Leykis was advising all the useful parts in TRP 20 years ago without all the acronym bullshit and psuedo-scientific garbage. I can pretty much guarantee listening to old Tom Leykis shows will be 10 times mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/19 04:43 PM
1

No, that's just a weird, useless way of thinking. Who cares if someone had plastic surgery or wears make up? Seems weird to think that is dishonest when it has nothing to do with you. But if someone does have some personal issue with other people having plastic surgery then its on that person with the issue to bring that up ASAP and make it known.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/19 04:31 PM
0

Forget every single acronym and buzz word from TRP. Never think using that terminology.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/19 04:25 PM
1

Do you have any actual data to back this up? No offense but I don't care about any anonymous Redditors random observations about anything. Back up anecdotes with linkable proof and then we can talk
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/19 04:19 PM
6

I don't see any gender disparity in entitlement attitudes in general. I run into just as many entitled men as women. Now its possible they aren't as entitled about sex specifically as women but overall it balances out. I never really thought to limit entitlement thinking to just sex so I never really noticed any disparity there.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/19 04:15 PM
1

This is wise advice for any young lurkers.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 05:20 PM
5

Toys R Us You mean the unemployment line?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 05:18 PM
1

I refuse to do so. It always leads to either drama or in rare cases marriage. Not much in-between. More drama than marriages though and best to be avoided. (unless you are talking about retail jobs for teenagers where hooking up is always common and the job is just short term not a career)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 05:14 PM
1

Tinder has always been considered trashy by most people. Bumble is also considered trashy. You have to go on Match or eHarmony to not be considered trashy dating digitally.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 05:12 PM
1

Good. I like it better hitting on girls than if the reverse was true.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 05:11 PM
0

hot women are not some monotonous group. The hot women I knew that usually said this were usually bitches, workaholics or both plus they didn't go to bars, clubs or parties often and were more sober types.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 04:57 PM
11

Stop listening to weirdos putting forth silly acronyms trying too hard to sound STEM. Stop describing yourself as "childfree post-wall INTP femcel". That is going to make any normal, decent man run the opposite direction very fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 11:35 PM
1

I always prefer girls that are into make-up. I don't give a fuck if the girl looks different without make-up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 11:29 PM
4

she's the ideal mother or even wife figure. Ew no.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 05:10 PM
3

Of course they do. They just don't use retarded terminology like "spinning plates"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 03:00 AM
1

I don't agree with your reasons at all. But prostitution definitely should be legal. Fuck all the social conservative, dogmatic religious assholes for these types of stupid social conservative policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 03:45 PM
1

So what is your advice, is it possible to go out alone at night and do well. Yes but only if you into the scene naturally. For instance, if you are a hardcore metal head and you go to metal clubs by yourself you can have an easy time meeting girls by yourself and not seem weird. Because you are a metal head in a metal club. However, if you just go to whatever trendy nightclub is popular in your city that isn't part of a specific scene that you are already into then you will probably look like a …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/18 04:37 PM
2

You got yourself suspended darling. And I'll always call out bullshit when I see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 04:16 PM
13

Silliness. Stay at home wives are just as likely to cheat or even more likely depending on the career of the working wife. I've seen all kinds of affairs from stay at home wives - contractors that have time during the day, college boy toys, random guys that are at the gym, beach bums. Cheaters are going to cheat no matter whether they work or stay at home.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 08:58 PM
1

Of course. I find it impossible not to factor personality into dating. Of course if some random fuck buddy situation arose without needing to know a girls personality, that isn't necessarily bad either. But in normal interactions its unavoidable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/18 05:51 PM
1

It depends on the type of bar/club they are going. There are women into dancing. I know women that go to specific swing, salsa, line, jazz, hip hop and ballroom events and club nights specifically for dancing. But if its just some trendy college bar that plays crappy pop music then yeah its not for dancing. Also I know women that just like to drink. They aren't specifically looking for a dude to fuck, they just like to drink. I wish people would stop generalizing everything on here into black an…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/18 05:33 PM
1

I had a gf who would get strangers to buy her drinks then come share the drink with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/18 05:28 PM
5

Should there be stricter and more gender neutral dresscodes in the workplace? No. You want companies to outlaw lipstick?? lol sorry but that is just a horrible idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/18 05:13 PM
1

Probably because its just false to assume hypergamy is ubiquitious among women and polygamy among men. Reality is there percentages of both men and women that are hypergamous and a percentage of both men and women that are polygamous. Of course I've seen hypergamy defined differently so I don't even think r/trp agrees on the definition. Its why Art of Seduction is more useful than anything posted on r/trp
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/18 04:57 PM
11

Men are supposed to be primarily attracted to women ages 18-23 Because that's mostly just a myth. Biologically men are attracted to a range of attractive body types. Age only matters because 19 year olds in the real world will have a higher likelihood of being hot than a 35 year old. But in porn that doesn't matter. When it comes to porn most 18-20 year olds are not good at fucking especially on camera. Better to just watch a 29 year old that still has a banging body than an 18 year old that is …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 08:24 PM
1

Just want to say you are definitely not the 2nd most obnoxious poster on here
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 08:16 PM
1

Just because they do doesn't mean they should.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 08:11 PM
2

Hence why I put slut in quotes to indicate I don't accept that red pill myth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 10:10 PM
8

True. Though some wallflowers are capable of being turned into sex kittens but not all. Some men and women simply have lower sex drives. Low sex drive people should pair up not keep trying with high sex drive people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 09:20 PM
2

Nope. Nothing to do with different opinion, everything to do with potentially violating site rules in endorsing violence. Do you also believe he should have hit her harder? Do you have an opinion on the actual topic ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 08:11 PM
2

I dated a virgin, good religious girl once. Worst dating experience of my life. Never dated that type again and I've definitely preferred the "sluts". Really the stupidest thing about the Red Pill imo is how they obsess over n-count. That's some lame high school bullshit asking how many people someone slept with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 08:03 PM
1

I thought explictly endorsing violence against specific individuals was also against site wide rules but I guess not. So saying that this guy deserves to be jailed beaten and raped is okay? But saying the same about "all regular TheRedPill" posters is not okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 07:08 PM
7

Its sad how such a simple point of putting the kids you chose to have above seflishly playing video games and then being verbally abusive to toddlers is somehow controversial and some people actually think he was justified in hitting the wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 06:37 PM
2

Stop defending people who are bad parents and call their own 2 year a cunt. We can play this game all day so either post on topic or get ignored
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 06:32 PM
1

That's not what I said at all and my posts are available to read. You are blatantly misrepresenting what I said. Its you who is not arguing in good faith in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 06:29 PM
3

So just to clarify. If I say "people that think he is not hitting her hard enough deserve to have their houses robbed and get physically beaten" that is acceptable because it is not explicitly directed against a user correct? I mean Atlas' comment wasn't general, it was endorsing violence against a specific person, a pregnant person at that. So saying things "everyone that hits their wife deserves to be anally raped in jail" should be okay yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 06:26 PM
5

Nope. This is a blatant strawman misrepresentation of any of the points I was trying to make. In fact no one has said your strawman "she can hit him, but he can't hit her". My point is that throwing cardboard is not equivalent to hitting. That is my point. And I already explicitly said if he threw card at her that is not assault either. So you are just blatantly misrepresenting my points and lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 06:23 PM
2

We're the civility police. You aren't even that though because you are allowing tons of uncivil comments. You are only saying you don't allow comments against a user. Well Atlas' husband is not a user here so insults to him should be okay then by your rationale. Or how about if I just say 'People that think things like "hes not hitting her hard enough. you can tell by her continuing to speak and her crocodile tears" are cowards that have not been raped enough in real life?' That isn't about a us…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 06:20 PM
4

So you think she should be prosecuted for throwing the cardboard but him physically hitting a pregnant woman is okay? I really hope you aren't going to try to tell me he was acting in self defense
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 06:14 PM
5

You're the one with bias here - Nothing but Team Woman uber alles with you on this one. I am Team Good Parents Being Responsible I oppose Team I Want to Be Selfish and Play My Video Games and Call My Daughter a Cunt This douche is clearly a bad father and I have seen the reverse in real life with a bad mother who wanted to put stupid video games over their own children. No excuse for saying "shut you cunt" to your 2 year old. You are on Team Its Okay to Call My 2 Year Old a Cunt
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 06:04 PM
6

So that would imply endorsing physical violence in a criminal context is okay to do here. I guess this place is going downhill then?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 06:01 PM
4

I'm having a hard time understanding where you are drawing the line of when endorsing physical violence in a criminal context is acceptable to you: hes not hitting her hard enough. you can tell by her continuing to speak and her crocodile tears. So can I say "Atlas' neighbors haven't hit her hard enough. You can tell by her continuing to post complete garbage." How about "Atlas and husband clearly haven't been raped hard enough, you can tell by the illogical posts she makes" does that violate th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 05:59 PM
3

You better believe if HE had thrown cardboard at HER, there'd be no question that he assaulted and battered her. Nope. That would not have been assault either. This is a guy who called his own 2 year daughter to "shut up you cunt". He is clearly a shitty parent, never should have had a kid and nothing that happened excuses or justifies his domestic abuse in any way. This is all just "man bad, woman good". Nope its really not. That is just your monumental bias showing. I've seen the exact reverse…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 05:55 PM
4

Do you really think the people saying he didn't beat his wife enough are arguing in good faith? So I can start posting how certain posters need their face kicked in now because endorsing violence against people we don't like is acceptable here?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 05:41 PM
6

So you endorse domestic violence. /u/William_Howe is this really the acceptable level of commenting here? I thought this place had more class.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 05:40 PM
3

You realize she threw cardboard at him right? If you actually think that is assaulting him or battering him you need to give your head a wobble
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 05:38 PM
18

Are you actually serious with this question? Its literally the easiest to answer of any question ever posted on Purple Pill Debate and it even has a right and wrong answer like a math question. So, if you were MrDeadMoth, what would you do in this situation? How about not putting stupid video games above your own fucking kid? Try being a responsible parent before you play your video games. Wait until your kid is asleep before being a selfish dick about video game time. How he treats his own chil…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 05:31 PM
2

I worked in Silicon Valley and they are far more libertarian than progressive. The idea that Silicon Valley is some liberal mecca because they don't give a shit if two gays get married or people get abortions is just social conservative propaganda from Rush and Hannity
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:39 PM
2

lol cause they aren't liberal and they exactly media either. http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/11/study-shows-tech-elites-are-less-liberal-than-they-think.html
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 04:57 AM
2

And here I thought one man saying his opinion over the TV or in a newspaper was also “user generated content.” But when a Democrat does it, it’s “mainstream media.”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 03:03 AM
4

lefty talk radio? lol, yeah Air America failed years ago. Social Conservative and evangelical loons dominate radio across the country. And social media is liberal? lol. Its user generated content and its filled with conservatives spamming just as much as liberals. I see conservative crap all day on social media. But carry on with your victim complex about the liberal media lol Wah Wah
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:56 AM
3

No, you've just shown you are heavily biased. Conservative: Fox, Sinclair, Talk Radio, Wall Street Journal, Evangelical media Liberal: MSNBC, CNN, NY Times, Wash Po You social cons have no point. Your media is probably even more widespread than liberal media.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:47 AM
3

Nice red herring. I'll just copy and paste now since you are just repeating your myth over and over hoping its true Conservative media is just as widespread as liberal media.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:44 AM
5

I just did. I'll only repeat myself once Fox dominates cable news. Conservative talk dominates radio. Sinclair dominates local television. You have evangelicals spread throughout media from TV to radio. Then you have all the websites that social cons exclusively listen to. Conservative media is just as widespread as liberal media.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:34 AM
4

Media? No, that's a myth. Fox News is everywhere. Conservative talk radio absolutely dominates every media market in the country. Sinclair controls the local TV stations just yesterday issuing a memo enforcing all their local syndicates to run a biased social conservative story. Leftists do dominate the Humanities departments but that is because far more conservatives don't want to go into academia in the first place so its a stupid complaint. They all are business majors and want to go into bus…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:24 AM
1

shame the political outgroup. lol Republicans have had the Presidency, House and Senate for 2 years and now have a solid social conservative majority on the SC for the next few decades. In what world are they the outgroup?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:16 AM
4

Everyone has known some limpdick who boasts about himself all the time and is constantly making everything about them. They are boorish louts and no one ever wants to hang out with them. This is why Trump has always gotten rejected by people of his own social class his entire life (like when the NFL told him to fuck off several times) and he has had to hang out with sycophants and bootlickers who are blinded by his opulence but desperate to get a piece for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:11 AM
3

Depends on how its done. If its the plan where men have to "opt in" to be parents and no child that results from sex is a man's financial responsibility unless he signed the form then: Will more men take less precautions or behave more riskily, like refusing to use male contraceptive methods like condoms and coming inside their partners? Probably because men have much less incentive and consequences for risky behavior. Will more men engage in casual sex with strangers? Same. Less incentive and l…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:00 AM
7

Your behavior itself is a red flag tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 04:16 PM
6

The way I was taught to date was to establish what I wanted in the first few dates (marriage, kids, settling down) and vet the man for good qualities. Is he nice? Is he responsible? Is his poop in a group? Is he financially stable? Do we live similar lifestyles? Is there a long term future with him? From day 1 vs at a later time. If someone is looking for a LTR this is the only way to date imo
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 04:14 PM
1

I don't understand the point of this post. Everyone has the right to reject anyone else for any reason. No one is morally obligated to enter into any relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 12:28 AM
2

I think LPS should work wherein he obtains written consent to opt out of fatherhood prior to having sex to begin with, I think since this would be his "right", the burden of enforcing it should be on him. This is much more sane the OP suggestion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 12:26 AM
3

Horrible idea both morally and practically as a precedent. The logical corollary to this suggestion is any woman can claim they only slept with a man because he lied to her and just demand financial support anyway. I don't think you (or the nimrods who spread these silly ideas) have thought this idea through very well.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 12:25 AM
1

Not at all just provide condoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 02:35 AM
2

What is flirting in inappropriate situations to you? Pursuing relationships in the workplace varies greatly depending on where you work and how big the workplace is. If its a company of thousands, its not too big of a deal. If its a small firm, it can cause drama. In some cases though like big law firms when people spend 50+ hours a week with co-workers its going to happen anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 04:48 PM
2

Or never mind the bollocks and just read Art of Seduction
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 04:45 PM
1

friend of a friend
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 04:43 PM
2

Kim is just attracted to herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/18 03:34 PM
1

Different strokes. I find your posts to be very opinionated and sheltered but you do whatever works for you
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 07:36 AM
1

I think the term for this type of wife is ball and chain ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 06:53 AM
15

One only need to look at concerts, bars and other live social events and see how many people are on their phone to see that smart phone social media does interrupt many people's live social interactions. Going further the tautology clearly isn't true in reality either its just a clever phrase with no meaning
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 04:36 AM
2

let me help you move This happened all the time in my early 20s among large groups of friends. Nothing weird about this at all if the people are in college or starting first jobs. let's go out and get a drink one on one, let's go on a trip together These are definitely signs of one person wanting more. And if in a relationship red flags let's play a round of golf together WTF? I have never met a girl either a co-worker or lover that ever wanted to play a round of golf at all with anyone. This on…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 04:29 AM
1

Its weird your only view of friendship is orbit some slut. So all your husband's co-workers, clients, associates are sluts? There is no way to be friends on a level without orbiting? For example if your husband is a lawyer he can't be friends with any female lawyers he works with? They have to be disinterested co-workers that only ever talk work?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 04:21 AM
17

We hook up because we have no social skills. We have no social skills because we hook up.” Cute tautology but it doesn't work like that. They have no social skills because they are obsessed with digital interaction instead of human to human interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 04:15 AM
3

No. Not at all. Spend more time in the real world and less on the internet. Your entire premise is flawed. You have no way of knowing what life was like 100-200-300 years ago. You can imagine but ultimately how you imagine life was like as a man 100 years ago is going to be filtered through your belief system. Its not valid. People romanticize an idea of how things used to be so they can then complain about how things are now
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/18 04:13 PM
2

I knew a few creepy guys in high school. They eventually went to college, stopped being uptight prudes and started drinking, smoking pot and loosening up. Now they are married with kids. They never became the most outgoing or life of the party but they loosened up and eventually met women at their level. Happier marriages even than some of the "cool" guys in the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 06:34 PM
4

I don’t have beta orbiters. Any advice on where I can find them? post on gonewild
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 06:27 PM
1

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 12:44 AM
1

MBTI is obviously more accurate than astrology but its still a bit subjective so shouldn't be taken as truth. Its still a lot better when someone says oh I do that because I am INTJ rather than I do that because I am a Cancer with Leo Moon.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 03:29 PM
21

You're just a cheapskate
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 04:36 AM
4

Indian women are super hot
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 03:01 PM
1

lol you can't use one person's anonymous claims on the internet as proof of a claim about society
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 12:42 AM
2

How would you attempt to quantify this?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/18 03:02 PM
1

Don't confuse Trump with traditional conservatives or Republicans. Despite a few common angles like tax cuts, Trump is not a normal traditional
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 11:19 PM
1

Are you Bill Clinton or Brett Kavanaugh?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 04:01 PM
7

Its okay to be a virgin Skratt. You don't have to front
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 04:00 PM
6

meanwhile the right is going down the totalitarian fascist route , again with the parallels quite clear and most don't even realize
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 03:50 PM
1

not always, some are just super controlling people with all their kids and others have other issues that come off as controlling. Definitely there is always one creepy dad in high school classes though
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 11:55 PM
1

Ahh lol, now it makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 08:23 PM
1

da fuk is maliest supposed to mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 08:22 PM
3

Are you too stupid to figure it out without someone babying you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 08:06 PM
3

All true. Worst poster on this forum
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 08:06 PM
1

Have you stopped beating your wife yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 08:05 PM
3

First, you are confusing Trump voter for a Trump supporter. There are some people that will always vote Republican no matter what so they voted for Trump but they aren't his core of support. Trump appeals to certain types of voters on the right more than others Second, the support for Trump at the highest income levels is only 48-46%. Its not really a significant difference. https://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 07:57 PM
1

I self-identify as a 3000 year old mummy
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 07:47 PM
3

Aren't you a Trump supporter?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 07:46 PM
1

https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/4d2f19b8ccd1d5e127120000-480-351.jpg Girl on the right is significantly more attractive to me. Not even close on this one for me as the other one is icky. But I can see how guys into the 'All American type' would downrate her so her rating is probably a little skewed by several with specific preferences. https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/4d2f1a3e4bd7c8190f120000-480-341.jpg Girl on the left is hotter but the girl on the right looks much friendlier and …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/18 05:47 PM
2

Agreed. In my experience the girls with 0-3 partners are the most likely to cheat in LTRs in their 20s
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/18 05:38 PM
1

Not sure what definition you are using to form that conclusion - seems to weird to call any company that takes a tax break or subsidy a "public private hybrid". By your definition all the oil companies are hybrids, all the farmers receiving subsidy from Trump are now public private hybrids, etc. But anyway whats your solution? Do you want government to force companies like Google to accept whatever demands to change their Terms of Service come from some arbitrary government planner? Do you want …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/18 05:21 PM
1

Nice red herring. The response would be : TIL GayLubeOil doesn't believe individuals should have personal responsibility and governments should force private corporations to do whatever a loud anonymous person wants
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/18 01:32 AM
1

The slippery slope fallacy is not a valid reason
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 04:37 PM
1

lol that genuinely made me laugh out loud
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 04:24 PM
1

I don't have time to play games. I am only interested in your opinion on the question asked not playing answering a question with a question games. I'll just mark you down as not willing to answer. Have a good night
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 04:24 AM
1

Are you going to answer my question or not? Do you believe that schools (public and private) should not be allowed to ban racial and sexual orientation slurs against other students on the grounds of "free speech" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 04:21 AM
1

You didn't answer the question. Its a valid question for the free speech absolutists that has nothing to do with the 1A since I am asking your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 04:16 AM
1

Do you believe that schools (public and private) should not be allowed to ban racial and sexual orientation slurs against other students on the grounds of "free speech" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 03:54 AM
1

My bad, I realized I meant that reply to go to the person you were replying to. FWIW I agree completely with what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 03:54 AM
1

Do you believe that schools (public and private) should not be allowed to ban racial and sexual orientation slurs against other students on the grounds of "free speech" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 03:28 AM
1

Is Free Speech a fundamental Western Value ? Yes, but free speech absolutism is not a fundamental value. There are a number of other values every bit as important as "free speech" and are not trumped by "free speech". For instance someone is not allowed to walk onto private property of an individual or business and harass and insult them without consequence. Your right to "free speech" does not trump my right to allow who or what I want on my private property. Who's responsibility is it to enfor…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 03:10 AM
3

Its not just political reasons but for career climbers in many corporate cultures in modern America, being married by 35 is generally seen to help career advancement. As another person mentioned, single people in their late 30s in the corporate world might be seen as more emotionally immature. Its hard to really capture all the implications in a few sentences but being married in corporate cultures is definitely seen as being a positive quality. Sure this isn't going to apply to everyone but it …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 06:50 PM
2

Ah but this gets to what I mentioned to squid, the downside to those cities for many is the weather. I know people who grew up in the northeast and wouldn't move back even if there was a good job and cheaper home because they hated shoveling snow. You are probably right that if someone is not picky about the weather they could find some good value locations. Usually with low home prices though you have to deal with some combination of lack of jobs, bad weather or crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 06:34 PM
2

OK that makes sense. So basically there are jobs for skilled, unskilled and professional but they just might not be exactly what someone's specialty or experience is in. That definitely makes sense for some people and would be an excellent opportunity. Of course the area might not be for everyone. For instance, I know people who live in Phoenix, Az and the twin cities, Minnesota. Good opportunities and affordable housing in both but obviously someone would have to at least be able to tolerate th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 06:24 PM
3

60-90K for high school grad (with presumably other professional jobs scaled higher) in an area where 90K homes are common? So a high school grad could just move there today and have a 60-90K job tomorrow? Is this is a high risk industry? Are these high school grads skilled union labor (like carpenter or electrician)? There has to be some downside here that you haven't mentioned yet I'm really curious to learn more about this area you are talking but don't want to violate any rules or ask you too…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 05:01 PM
3

Yea idk if the actions of hippies are a good example when arguing any point. But I understand what you're saying. Maybe it's just me, but still, if you can't defend something logically; it doesn't seem like a good decision. I stated my case very logically. You asked what benefits there are to young people getting married. And I answered with several reasons supported by examples: social, political, professional and ritual based benefits. I don't think you have countered or answered any of those …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 04:56 PM
4

70K ? That definitely seems lower than normal and the result of a specific circumstance? An auction or something? Also when you plenty of jobs, what types of jobs though? Are you talking mostly retail and unskilled labor or professional jobs?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 04:50 PM
3

The other factor you are not considering is jobs. You might think the suburbs of Cullman, Alabama are a nice neighborhood but if you can't find work there its meaningless no?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 04:47 PM
5

The ritual of a wedding or the ritual of signing the documents? The entire process is the ritual. There is a reason a hippie couple I know that believes neither in religious marriage nor US legal marriage, still had a ceremony and reception, invited friends and recited vows with a master of ceremonies who pronounced them married after they exchanged wedding bands. The ritual of marriage has meaning for some people. Maybe not you but definitely others. Yea that really worked out for her. It did t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 04:36 PM
7

Tinder
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 03:57 PM
3

Which city's suburbs are an example of inexpensive? What if commuter suburbs are not the type of neighborhood someone considers desirable?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 03:56 PM
6

What's the benefit to either parties? Because some people are natural pair bonders. I have friends and family I can't even begin to imagine not with their spouse. Some people are just more suited to lifelong pair bonding than others. I have seen a lot of examples in my life of people who are naturally monogamous. And whether you blame the diamond industry or not but culturally many see the rituals of marriage as romantic. Don't underestimate the power of ritual. Also, for others its social and p…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 03:27 PM
5

Plenty of nice areas that aren't expensive. Curious of some examples that you are thinking of
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 03:19 PM
1

/u/sketch162000 is spot on. Only thing I would add I would add over-thinking instead of just acting in certain situations
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 03:11 PM
1

find a hobby you are into, don't ever become attached to the outcome of a social interaction, stop reading subreddits like trp until you already have a GF
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 03:07 PM
1

In my experience woman under 25 with 0-3 prior partners were the most likely to cheat by a large degree. Normal amount of partners for me is about 5-30 depending on age. I don't care if the number was 50+ if the girl was around my age (late 30s for instance). But then personally I like girls with a lot of experience so as long as she still looks good enough prior partners is irrelevant to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 03:00 PM
1

I wish people would define what an acronym means at the start.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 04:28 AM
1

Attractive with low sex drive. If she was unattractive I wouldn't even want to have sex with her so its a no-brainer for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/18 11:07 PM
1

Great fun in your 20s without emotional attachment. Not a stable lifestyle to raise children in though
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/18 04:19 PM
1

Without you presenting some concrete evidence of how you even define "beta men" you can never know how many there actually are. Maybe you just surround yourself with too many beta men? Have you considered that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/18 04:18 PM
3

Putin probably has leverage on Trump. Not surprising considering what a mess his businesses always were
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/18 06:09 PM
1

There is probably some theoretical argument for humanity becoming asexual after reproducing 1-4 children (depending on situation). It could be optimal for a society to produce genetic offspring and then stop pursuing casual sex or creating more offspring, instead dedicating the second stage of life to advancing the human species (whether through entrepreneurship, academia, science or supporting existing family).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/18 06:33 AM
1

Because they have social clout
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/18 10:37 PM
1

I'm defining popular by this poll which has 7% of Americans naming soccer as favorite sport and only 4% naming ice hockey. https://www.phillyvoice.com/poll-soccer-nearly-cracks-americans-top-three-favorite-spectator-sports/ Also the thing you miss about soccer viewership is that MLS is not the standard. I live in the US. I never watch MLS but I watch streams of PL, Ligue Un, Bundesliga and La Liga plus several more. There is massive streaming of European leagues and then the Spanish language sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/18 06:15 AM
3

In any of those imaginary situations if it actually happened the way you imply the man should sue for custody of the child and raise on his own.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/18 06:06 AM
1

NHL might be above MLS on all measures but soccer as a sport is definitely more popular than hockey Twice as many list soccer as their favorite sport than hockey Four times as many play soccer than hockey Five times as many NCAA Div.1 teams in soccer than hockey All 50 states sponsor high school soccer while only 15 sponsor hs hockey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_in_the_United_States These stats also don't accurate capture how many people watch European leagues and South American/Mexican …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/18 03:32 AM
1

Twice as many list soccer as their favorite sport than hockey Four times as many play soccer than hockey Five times as many NCAA Div.1 teams in soccer than hockey And these numbers definitely do not capture the full extent of how many Americans watch European leagues every week. Safe to say soccer is much more popular than hockey across the full USA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_in_the_United_States
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/18 03:30 AM
1

Weird question because it assume that old school AFDC and Clinton's TANF are the only two possible options. Both are flawed so its weird to set up the question to force a choice between two flawed options.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 03:29 AM
1

I think this sub would be better if meta jargon (or as I call it buzzword substitutes that replace learning how to communicate original thoughts and ideas) were not used.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 03:22 AM
1

Baseball is actually far more interesting than cricket.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 03:18 AM
4

Only asshole Americans think like that
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 03:18 AM
3

Actually in the USA it is: 1) NFL 2) basketball 3) baseball 4) soccer
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 03:14 AM
2

Define exactly what you mean by "financial abortions" first
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 03:13 AM
3

Its weird that people believe someone's entire life experience is literally impossible because it doesn't conform to some weird set of acronyms invented by an anonymous dude online in the last 10 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 03:11 AM
1

Ruben Loftus-Cheek Is it coming home?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 03:05 AM
1

I am just sharing my experiences from tending pubs for over 10 years in several different cities. You can believe whatever you want but I am certainly not changing my mind from my experience based on you declaring something. I have personally not seen or experienced 2nd tier struggle or be confused more than other tiers. 4th tier is by far the most confused I have witnessed for the exact reasons I stated: 2nd tier has a lot of options that 4th tier does not have access to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/18 05:54 AM
1

You've not stated facts about Peterson's daughter. Just your own moral judgments based on little actual information.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/18 05:46 AM
1

This post is why I think you sound like a mean, judgmental ball buster. You are making very strong judgments about a situation you really know nothing about. It comes across as mean spirited, nosy and just plain weird to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/18 05:36 AM
2

I'll give a brief general example. From what I saw in pubs, 2nd tier might be confused first entering the game, but quickly settle into one of three things: -either leveraging a strong personality/money/coolness factor into snagging a 1st tier -find some looksmatch 2nd tier with compatible personality/interests -settle for a 3rd tier where they are the dominant partner From what I seen it was the borderline 3/4th tiers that struggled the most because they desperately keep trying to snag a solid …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/18 05:32 AM
1

Male. My opinion comes from tending pub and observing the game for years and then being a defacto therapist for both men and women as they drink.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/18 05:22 AM
1

You do realize that just because a kid was born a "bastard" doesn't mean they lack a father. It literally means the kid was simply born out of official wedlock. If you go look at her instagram she has a man in most pictures with her kid. Looks to me like there are two parents just not in a religious marriage. Don't really want to stalk her any more but I think your name calling and insults are completely out of order and not in line with facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/18 05:18 AM
4

2nd tiers are more likely to get confused by all this dating up/dating down nonsense and have no idea what their actual league is. That definitely does not match my experience at all. If that's your experience then fair enough but mine doesn't match that theory at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/18 05:06 AM
5

Wouldn't the motivation be the same for 4th as 2nd just at a different level? 2nd spends time to try to attract 1st tiers. 4th might spend the time to try to attract 3rd tiers. At least when I was tending pubs, I saw examples of that (4th tier trying to look good to attract 3rd tier)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/18 04:22 AM
14

Logically, To make the absolutely most out of your looks as a second tier man, you have to learn game, spend tonnes on fashion, approach hundreds (or thousands) of women, spend hours online dating, Wouldn't all of that apply even more to lower than 2nd tier? I don't think there is any "confusion".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/18 04:08 AM
3

bastard Did we teleport into Game of Thrones? I wasn't aware people still believed that having a child outside of religious marriage was some sort of evil thing that makes a woman a "slut". To be honest I think you sound like a mean, judgmental ball buster. I can understand why nice boyfriends would choose other women that you (probably incorrectly and out of jealousy) label as "sluts" If I had a choice between someone with your attitude and a slut in your eyes, just going by your posts here I'd…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/18 09:59 PM
1

Normies Who counts as a "Normie" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/18 07:02 PM
1

What evidence do you have his daughter is a slut?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/18 06:46 PM
1

I bet he lived near the beach and was a surfer bum yea?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/18 05:51 PM
2

You're right my bad lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 01:42 AM
1

Yeah big saggy boobs and a very average face
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 01:42 AM
1

Why people insist on using this lingo like "plate spinning" instead of speaking in normal english? How do you personally even define "plate spinning" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/18 10:12 PM
1

Just curious, Do you make up your own nick names for all your co-workers then? Do you call William at work Billy-Jo-Bob? Do you call Cindy "flat chested Cindy"? Do you call the Asian man at work "Chinaman"? How far do you go with this bad ass attitude of calling anyone whatever you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/18 10:08 PM
1

I don't know those last two shows but this one is pretty classic depiction of high schoolers
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/18 10:04 PM
3

Yeah that girl is bang average
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/18 10:02 PM
6

Naw, a lot of women look better in person. Some are far hotter in person. For me its almost the reverse. Internet pics get boring after a min or two
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/18 10:00 PM
1

No man I know has, in the early stages of a relationship, ever moved to where his girlfriend was living. Weird comment. I know plenty of men who have to moved to where their girlfriend was living.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/18 09:54 PM
1

Fair enough if you have no double standards
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 06:02 PM
1

Do you quiz your partners on everything they have ever done? If you do, how long into dating do you wait until you ask them all these things? Do you also then confess everything you have ever done with previous partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 05:20 PM
5

Yeah there is a reason that the whole 'kid dating someone the parents don't approve of despite the parent's warnings that the person is bad' is a common plot device in sit-coms, coming of age movies, etc. Imo kids have to be given room to make mistakes and live and learn and then grow into independent critically thinking people. Its impossible for a parent to micromanage their kid through every decision to make sure they never make an error. Every example of those attempts I've seen of that end …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 04:51 PM
6

Oh you are going to reply to this post but not my first one? That's the post you really need to read and internalize
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 03:36 PM
6

Apparently not volunteering every single detail of previous sex partners is "lying about your past". This is despite the fact a huge number of couples agree at the outset to simply not talk about exes and such. I also don't see any post that recognizes the reality that sex isn't this static "thing" that the OP seems to view it as. A great lover for 3 weeks might turn into a dead bedroom after 1 year. Or some people can evolve into far better lovers than they were when first met. I have experienc…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 03:29 PM
22

I think you are misrepresenting the views people posted in that thread but whatever. Also as man I never would have wanted mom and sister's advice like you seem to want. My advice: Get off the internet for 6 months (or at least these anonymous forums of male-female bs). Go buy yourself : Dale Carnegie's How to Make Friends and Influence People and Robert Greene's Art of Seduction. Study those books. Then go buyself a flogger. Everytime you think some useless thought like wondering about how good…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 02:24 PM
4

found the Russian
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 03:09 AM
1

Oh there is, its just not very public. Its about leveraging their good looks into real power.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 01:51 AM
2

You have evidence of the opposite? What is your evidence of "men being forced to penetrate women" that is "equal to men penetrating women without consent"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 03:30 PM
2

that's what the real blue pill is for
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/18 06:12 AM
8

Do you also oppose when men lie to women to get sex? Does Drake have any personal responsibility for not taking his own pre-cautions? Why didn't Drake just wear a condom?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 04:39 PM
3

because no one fucks outside of marriage. I would suggest this is not true at all. Its just done much more secretively due to the harshness of religious laws
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 02:55 PM
1

Depends on the circumstance. But definitely there are certainly stay at home wives (not all though) who trade sex for monetary support. Not a prostitute though, just a gold digger. Or I suppose there is another more accurate term, probably in French
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 02:54 PM
1

Likewise.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 04:45 PM
3

Hope you are taking care of those kids yourself and not expecting other men or the state to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 04:27 PM
1

It might surprise you but a lot of 20 year old girls like sex with 30-40-something men that know what they are doing more than immature 21 year old boys that might look great but are clueless in many ways. Also you seem to talking as if the only possible relationship option is a traditional marriage. Many people are not looking for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 04:26 PM
0

Yup. My Facebook list is littered with 30-50 year old parents who swore in their 20s they never, ever wanted kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 04:18 PM
1

What? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 04:15 PM
1

So he is saying his opinion matters and if other people rate a woman higher their opinion doesn't matter. Got it. In this case, the vast majority of men would not rate a 35 year old woman higher than a 20-25 year old in terms of looks. That was a complete strawman though. The point wasn't at all what you just said. Had nothing to do with comparisons. The point was whether a 35 year old woman could possibly be an 8-9. Its pretty obvious that a 35 year old can be an 8-9. One only has to look at Ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 04:14 PM
2

All of this is quite irrelevant. My point being only that its normal for a 35 year old woman to be rated 8-9 by some men. Maybe not you , but perhaps its you that is not normal in your tastes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 08:08 PM
-1

No. You implied that no woman who is 35 could possibly be an 8-9. I disagreed with your presumptuous comment with examples that disprove your implication that "all men" would believe it was impossible for a 35 year old woman to be an 8-9. My point is simply that its very obvious that there are 8-9s among women in their 30s. Don't move the goalposts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:59 PM
1

As much as your subjective opinion matters
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:54 PM
1

Not me. I find a lot of girls more attractive at 30 than 20 and most definitely 16. 16 looks way too young. really depends on the girl. Some girls mix of lifestyle and genetics peaks out at 21, whereas other women's mix of lifestyle and genetics can peak at 30 or even higher. Additionally its well known some nationalities age extremely well (Japanese for instance I know girls that don't look any different from 22 to 35 and some are in better shape so overall they improve from 22 to 35).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:47 PM
1

I know plenty of girls that are 8-9 at 35. Heck Hollywood is filled with them if you actually look up how old the actresses are playing the High school girl
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:39 PM
2

What's my deal? Sounds like you are with a gigalo where the trade-off is you pay for him and he gives you sex. No?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:38 PM
2

Bail me out of jail Even better, be there with me wtf lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:34 PM
2

If you don't know the guy there is no bro code. He isn't your bro
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:31 PM
2

Weird, I know a married couple that started as the sister of the man's best friend. Maybe what you are talking about is a thing in high school but definitely not after college.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:29 PM
1

Scarface reference
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:28 PM
1

Yes. Don't fuck your bro's gf/wife - unless they are poly or swingers of course. People that break it lose their friends (at least in my circles) It should be easy to live by, all of my friends are like this - but then I am not friends with men that are not honorable like this. I try to keep men who are not honorable as only acquiantances never friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:27 PM
4

Because it leaves absolutely no room for confusion and sends zero mixed messages I prefer to ghost myself
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:18 PM
0

Nope, not morally wrong in any way. People need to stop feeling entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:17 PM
1

That was your analogy not "our" I have no interest in trying to discuss this issue by analogy. Arguments by analogy tend to go nowhere and people end up arguing about whether the analogy is even appropriate in the first place instead of moving forward on the actual issue at hand. Waste of time. Anyway, I already made my point. If you disagree we can agree to disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:13 PM
1

Do you have actual evidence of this alleged 55-45 ratio or just anonymous posts on a subreddit?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 07:10 PM
2

To me, what many here miss is that financial responsibility is not the only responsibility that exists for a child. Money is not going to do everything necessary to raise that child. And it isn’t going to help much in the 9 months of pregnancy and the birth itself and the after effects of that on a woman. It isn’t a replacement for a father figure. It isn’t love and psychological and emotional support. It helps to have the extra money in raising a child as a single mother - but there are many ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 04:28 PM
1

Whats the ratio of men raped by women compared to women raped by men?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 04:20 PM
1

If you go out to the club and meet a girl, you have to talk abortion in the club or in the cab drive back to her place or you're responsible ? ONS drunk hook-ups from clubs and bars are usually the definition of irresponsible sex. The fact that it happens doesn't make it responsible. Its still irresponsible. People have choices at certain points. If a man chooses to have unprotected without having any discussion and without know he can trust the women, then yes the responsibility is on him. Mist…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 04:17 PM
0

Yes. And men should not have sex with women that believe this or they suspect have this attitude. Sex is a responsibility of both parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 04:12 PM
1

You are being intentionally disingenuous. Nah, just making a joke. Maybe the wrong time to inject humour but I'm done being serious for the day For the record I agree. People not paying child support should not be put in jail. Jail should only be for violent crimes imo
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 01:18 AM
2

The situation we're talking aboiut is one where a fetus is conceived, the man does not want to have the child, he wants an abortion.... the woman disagrees and refuses an abortion... the child is born... and the man despite not wishing to have the child is forced to pay for it's upbringing, often putting an extremely high financial burden on a very poor man. Here is my personal take. It is both parties' responsibility to discuss consequences before actually engaging in sex (I know that's not sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 01:08 AM
3

Sabotage of birth control and birth control fraud is sadly pretty common You have a valid source on how common this is? I'd like to see some data on how common this practice is. If I believe people on here its really common but I never actually see it in my life so I am dubious of the internet claims. No, its the artificial consequence of people with guns coming to force you to pay. Having children is the consequence of people with guns coming into your home where you live? My condolences, you m…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:48 AM
3

Yes couples can choose to have an abortion and sometimes the woman alone or even man alone can choose to have the abortion. I am not making any sort of moral judgement as you seem to think. Simply a pragmatic one based on the simple concept of actions and consequences. If you don't want the risk of a baby don't have unprotected sex. Just add "or have sex without discussing an abortion plan ahead of time with your partner" to the original statement
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:44 AM
1

I disagree with your assumption that somehow those are arguments against abortion. I don't find your argument logical. If you don't want a kid, then don't have unprotected sex. Goes for both men and women. Don't take the risk if you staunchly are so against being a parent. is not an "argument against abortion". No idea what you are even talking about tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:36 AM
2

Can you provide a concrete example of a place in the US south and how hard it allegedly is to get birth control? Birth control can technically fail but a combination of condoms and the pill is close to foolproof. If a man really doesn't want to be a father he can just get a vasectomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:35 AM
1

In your opinion of course. In my opinion and my experience men's voices absolutely count. Mine counted. Your suggested changes to the law though make all the responsibility on the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:34 AM
1

I mentioned this before, but it bears repeating since it seems to be at the heart of the matter. Consent to sex isn't consent to parenthood. It's not fair to the parent or child to force an unwilling adult to be a parent. IMO you can't separate the two into completely different thing as you try to do because one is dependent on the other. If two people have a conversation before having sex and one says they don't want to be a parent if pregnancy happens and the other says okay then that's fine. …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:33 AM
2

I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:24 AM
0

Nope but thats not relevant to any point I've made so you have probably misunderstood something
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:22 AM
2

Your entire point. maybe re-phrase the wrong thing because its not making any sense and just sounds like a wind-up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:22 AM
0

No following this logic at all
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:21 AM
1

If the man wants to keep the child but the woman does not, abortion happens, screw the man Definitely not always true. I know single father where mother didnt want be part. Again its ablut trust, if you cant trust the woman to include you then dont have sex with her. I am a father and I agree some laws need to change but I would not support a law where all the responsible falls to the womem as you seem to endorse
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 10:04 PM
1

Im just going off comments I read. Feel free to add any nuance you feel is missing. Thing is I read red pill declare its always the single mother's fault for choosing to have sex with an irresponsible man. For me that thinking goes both ways. If I am not sure I could trust a woman to include me in a conversation if an honest mistake happened I wouldnt have sex. Problem avoided. I made that exact choice years ago in my 20s. Two girls I could have had sex with but I declined because I couldnt trus…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 10:02 PM
1

So someone does not choose to have unprotected sex? How is the choice to have unprotected sex forced on anyone? If your objection is to hardcore relgious people trying to limit birth control I agree those people are the problem but you'll have to give me a source of somewhere it is impossoble to obtain birth control
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 09:52 PM
1

I don't follow that
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 09:19 PM
-1

There is no trap. Sorry to disappoint
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 09:19 PM
3

I wouldn't support that change and I don't agree with your guess on what would happen personally. That's because you are just massively increasing the incentive for men to have unprotected sex because there is now less responsibility for men that comes with unprotected sex. I personally think you wouldn't see a decrease like you are guessing would happen. Would do you think about if the Republicans can actually repeal Roe v. Wade? Blue states would instantly legalize it but red states would be v…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 09:18 PM
1

One thing I find interesting is how some people immediately go right to the child support and monetary aspect (not meaning this directly at you). When I talk about having responsibility I am not just talking about child support but I am talking about being actively involved in raising the child that was created by their choice. Maybe that's what's shocking to me is some people seem to not even recognize this aspect. So for me its not just about legality of child support but I can't imagine ever …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 09:15 PM
5

A male CAN NOT ( in the US) MAKE a female have a child. Likewise a female cannot make a male have a child. A male must choose with agency to have unprotected sex well aware of the potential of pregnancy and STD to have a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 09:09 PM
-1

Ok I will rephrase Do you believe those that hold this belief should explain this belief to women before they sleep with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 09:08 PM
3

So do you believe that one single aspect completely nullifies all the choices a man makes to get a women pregnant? In other words, the man has no responsibility to any child that is fathered if he simply chooses not to be a parent?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 08:32 PM
0

Do you explain this belief of yours to women before you sleep with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 08:29 PM
3

but it shouldn't be required by law. A year ago I would have agreed because I hadn't met anyone that staunchly denied that men have responsibility for their children. But the attitude of some people here make me think a law is necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 08:29 PM
0

Parenthood is never forced on anyone. It is the natural consequence of having unprotected sex. Everyone has agency to choose to not have unprotected sex if they wish to avoid the potential consequences. Why do you not feel men should not have personal responsibility here? You are probably correct because I and everyone I know would staunchly oppose changing the law to what you wish. Few things I feel are more morally reprehensible than evading taking care of children one brought into the world. …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 08:26 PM
1

Not all pickup artists are about n-count. For instance a gigalo's goal is not to rack up high n-count but use PUA skills to achieve financial security from well to do women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 06:29 PM
1

I should also add "adoption" to the title.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 06:21 PM
3

What do you mean? If a baby is adopted both man and women have effectively evaded responsibility
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 06:21 PM
5

Ok and? You think that somehow completely negates any responsibility of the guy getting the girl pregnant? That it would be okay for you to go around, get 3 girls pregnant and take no responsibility for any of your kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 06:02 PM
1

Do you tell girls before you have sex with them that you believe you have no responsibility if you impregnate her to ever take care of the kid because she can just get an abortion?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 06:01 PM
1

Reality is it takes a man and woman to make a baby. And historically a man and woman are responsible for raising that baby. The law has long codified this norm for human nature. You trying to say men that get girls pregnant have NO responsibility to raising the kid is an insane justification for trying to evade all repurcussions of your actions. You want to act selfish and do whatever you want without any responsibility for your actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:51 PM
7

That is an insane belief to me. The levels of built in entitlement behind this thinking is crazy. You are trying to justify evading all personal responsibility for YOUR actions and then blaming it on society. At least now I know that red pill is absolutely not about personal responsibility in any way whatsoever. Its just cringey justification to act as selfish as you want and avoid all manner of responsibility for your own actions. Its remarkable how you think you can get a girl pregnant but you…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:49 PM
14

Polygamy seems to be vastly overrated on here. Only a minority of men are philanderers or would even choose to be. I am a serial monogamist as are many of my friends. The idea that "all men are naturally polygamous" is demonstrably untrue.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:44 PM
1

Archwinger, GayLubeOil or Rollo Tomassi Who are these people? Are they the red pill mods on Reddit?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:42 PM
7

trp is all about personal responsibility I have to disagree with this after reading some red pills bend over backwards to excuse all responsibility for deadbeats who get women pregnant and then evade their responsibility. They seem to believe men have no responsibility to any baby they create because a women has the "last say" on abortion. In fact, some of the comments by red pill on this topic were some of the most hardcore justifications for complete lack of personal responsibility for one's a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:38 PM
1

Only thing disgusting is some of you trying to defend guys that get girls pregnant then evade all responsibility to the children they created and then attack only the single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:34 PM
1

I know you really want man and woman to bear the same responsibility, but reality disagrees. Reality and the law agree with my view. Some of you trying to say men that go around getting women pregnant and then not participating in raising the kid and there is nothing wrong with that is what is completely divorced from reality and legality. The way you try to justify no responsibility to children the guys create is bizarre to say the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 05:32 PM
2

The main issue is women vote for what is good for women while men vote for what is good for men and also what is good for women, a bit of half and half. I haven't seen any evidence of this and I don't think this weird male/female distinction is part of the problem at all. The problem is the influence of religion in America and the entitlement of both men and women that results from religions like Christianity, Judaism and Islam.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 02:52 AM
3

I don't talk shit and pre-judge entire groups of people like you do. Big difference
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 01:54 AM
5

That's certainly not my view. My view is men are responsible for any woman they knock up. They should have the right to confirm paternity of course but if the kid is theirs, they are responsible. If a man doesn't want to take the chance of having a kid he doesn't/can't take care of then he simply shouldn't fuck that girl. If he makes the poor choice anyway and unloads into an irresponsible women that is 100% his responsibility for showing lack of self-control. If she doesn't have an abortion he …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 01:42 AM
5

Doesn't matter what you say, its the internet, you are most likely lying. I hope your Congressmen enjoys your letter on why Planned Parenthood funding is so important and why maintaining abortion rights is so crucial.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 01:38 AM
1

Makes no sense. The man's actions are just as responsible for the situation and if the woman has the baby the man is absolutely just as responsible. Its really illogical for you to only blame the woman. If you really care about the situation then you should be lobbying against deadbeat dads, you should be opposing "pump and dump" PUA culture, you should be lobbying against religion and the massive influence religion has on American people, you should be lobbying against all the anti-abortion act…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 01:09 AM
7

Bullshit. For every single mother there is a piece of shit man who is just as responsible for the situation. Sounds like you just want a scapegoat
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 01:00 AM
5

So you really have no grounds to call single mothers terrible for society because you are also terrible for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 12:58 AM
8

Deadbeat dads and cowards that impregnate women and then run away are terrible for society. Empirical studies consistently back that up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 12:57 AM
1

Is that from personal experience because that Illman looks like a shittier person for society than any kids of single parents I know?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 12:55 AM
1

You don't sound mature enough for that yet. Just keep fucking them. Having some set goal to "meet some unicorn I can marry and have kids with" is a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 05:42 PM
1

The point being that if Clinton was actually a good candidate and actually ran a good campaign she would have achieved more actual votes FOR her than 10.7% of the population. Roughly 35 million people vote FOR Hilary (and not Against Trump) out of a nation of 325 million. 33 million specifically voted against Hilary - a record setting number. A good Democratic candidate would have not inspired record numbers of Republican voters to go out and vote AGAINST her as the Pew Research shows. The Pew r…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 05:25 PM
4

Biggest problem with /r/trp people is they deny anyone's actual real life experience that doesn't support their abstract online narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 05:26 PM
2

There is no such thing as a generic "age wall". Different genetics, lifestyle, diet, exercise mean that some women are hot and attractive well into their 60s - Cindy Crawford, Goldie Hawn and many unknowns that I see in my daily life for example. I'd absolutely take CC over many, maybe even most 20-somethings.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 05:21 PM
1

Did you not see the Pew Research that showed at least 43% of Hilary voters were not voting For her but Against Trump? Essentially only 10.7% of Americans thought Hilary was a good enough candidate who ran a good enough campaign to motivate them to vote FOR her. The rest of her votes were Against Trump. 53% of Trump's votes were explicitly against Hilary. Thats an atrocious number and enough on its own to declare her one of the worst candidates in American history. Watch some focus groups and it …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 03:41 PM
2

SMV/RMV, AF/BB, AFC, the Wall, hypergamy. That's not a system. Its mostly just subjective opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 11:08 PM
1

Over 290 million Americans disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 10:56 PM
1

Here is some analysis that concludes 46% of Clinton voters were "Against Trump" voters. Admittedly less than my personal experience but I expected that. On the other end 53% of Trump voters were "Against Hilary" http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/02/for-many-voters-its-not-which-presidential-candidate-theyre-for-but-which-theyre-against/ Based on the fact that 46% of Hilary voters were not voting "for her" but "against Trump" and 53% of Trump voters were explicitly voting "against Hila…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 06:09 PM
1

Is there any limit? Do you believe unequivocally more free speech always equals a better policy? What do you feel about Oliver Wendell Holmes "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 06:07 PM
1

Hell no. I always thought the virgin thing was very weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 03:05 PM
1

It was the 1980s. The teenage neighbor was hooking up with my baby sitter. Completely normal and not odd at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 02:52 PM
1

That's probably true. Corporate culture might be stale, impersonal and unfair, but it does reduce rumours because you are getting worked half to death ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 10:02 PM
1

An example of what I mean is Truc Do, just nominated as Superior Court Judge, partner from Jones Day one of the highest rated corporate firms. I heard people say she was hot, had great legs, but no one ever questioned her skill as a litigator.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 09:44 PM
1

Hell yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 09:31 PM
1

Doesn't have to be from your parents though. I had a neighbor telling me about it at 6 years old before I even understood, but I still remembered. Older family, neighbors, I am shocked people think its not common.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 09:21 PM
1

I've never seen a top attractive female lawyer presumed to have gotten there by "other means".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 09:19 PM
1

That makes no sense whatsoever. Are you saying that everyone that voted for Hilary actually thought she was a wonderful candidate? That none of the votes were simply "against Trump" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 09:18 PM
14

I'll just leave this completely open and non-judgmental. What do people make of this? Does this change the way people should view gender dynamics? It just confirms everything I witness in real life. Women find wealthy/powerful men more attractive than men find that in women. Not sure how that is even controversial really.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 01:24 AM
3

Marvel movies are atrociously bad
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 08:02 PM
2

Would I date one for a while? Hell yes. They tend to be a lot less clingy, and a lot kinkier in the bedroom than the 8/10 in college who looks like a porn star, but fucks like a tranquillised mattress. Dude, stop giving these secrets away!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 07:57 PM
3

wtf? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 07:56 PM
3

What is there to disagree with? Hilary was a horrible candidate to begin with - that should have been bloody obvious after 2008 - and then she ran the most strategically flawed political campaign in my lifetime. Bob Dole and Walter Mondale ran more intelligent campaigns.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 07:50 PM
2

Among some the people I grew up with (super conservative religious town), before I deleted them from all my social media, they were all calling Michelle Obama a "tranny" and Obama a gay promoter of Sharia Law.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 07:43 PM
5

I've actually seen unattractive women struggle more to be taken seriously intellectually in some academic and professional settings than beautiful smart women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 07:31 PM
1

Jealousy from other women? You never had a stalker or someone not leave you alone?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 07:29 PM
1

what planet do you think ANYONE is ACTIVELY teaching young men about "sexual attraction" Uh the real world? Back in the 1980s every 8-14 year old was actively being taught things about sex whether it was the awkward dad talk or older friends/brothers/cousins schooling the young'uns. You sound like you and your husband grew up in some isolated, super traditional Republican town
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 06:58 PM
1

Chocolate Diamonds Good music
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 06:51 PM
12

Does level of "freedom of speech" determine whether or not a country is a joke?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 06:50 PM
5

An attractive woman is a high value woman. An obese woman is a low value woman. (yes I know some men have fat fetishes, doesn't change the general reality)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 06:47 PM
1

Ariel Winter
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/18 09:50 PM
1

In your opinion is it better have loved and lost than to never have loved at all? Absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/18 09:48 PM
25

Sounds like an incel's totalitarian fantasy. You sound like someone with a dictator fetish.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/18 09:43 PM
3

You don't pursue the person, but the person is interested and single. And on ALL FACTORS YOU CAN POSSIBLY ACCOUNT FOR, this person is more of a match for you than your current partner. You're sure that AT LEAST the "bit of a strain" you perceive won't exist anymore, but there's a chance that you'll find a whole new level to "happy couple". You're sure that this person is aware and intelligent enough to put efforts in the relationship you'll develop, provided that you had time to talk. That premi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/18 07:20 PM
1

Yes if there is no sexual attraction on either part. Yes if there is sexual attraction on both their parts and they are both capable of handling that. No in other cases if there is sexual attraction from only one party.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/18 04:51 PM
0

Never said "genetics" don't matter. Your interpretation of the data is just shite and incorrect. But carry on pretending its all about skin color and socioeconomic status and religion are irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/18 02:24 AM
0

Where is your data controlled for socio-economic status and religion? Whatever you consider as race is not the important variable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/18 01:25 AM
2

I expect a man to have a good job, Does the job matter? Or can they just be financially secure. treat me with love and respect, love me, These are reasonable. share my religious beliefs, Do they have to share your exact religion? Can they just be a believer who respects your specific religion but has a different religion? save sex for marriage, Is this a deal breaker? You want to marry a virgin male c.2018+ ? avoid alcohol and smoking and drugs, Again this is pretty demanding if you want them to…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 10:38 PM
1

IF she has a long list of standards and is a single mother, it is likely that she didn't have such a long list sometime ago, so it looks like she's overcharging you for something right? "overcharging"? So any person that decides to have stricter standards as they get older and wiser is suddenly "overcharging"? Even using this horribly bad analogy, it could easily just be said the person was "undercharging" before and simply "adjusting price to market rate".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 10:30 PM
1

They are harshly condemned and criticized for accepting a bad/ flakey man into their lives and taught that they should have been more picky. Do they ever blame the deadbeat sperm donor for their share of responsibility of the problem? Its just complete bias to blame single moms and not blame the deadbeat that knocked her up and then ditched her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 10:26 PM
1

Thats just a link to US Census Data, it doesn't control for any other variables
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 10:23 PM
1

Sure it might have stabilized that one thing but the cost was it created a host of more damaging problems. I don't know a single economist that thinks it was a success. History is beginning to show it was a disastrous policy. "Let’s remember that there are three primary sources of growth in any economy: labor, capital and productivity. Labor-driven growth originates from adding more workers to an economy. Capital-driven growth comes from deploying more equipment. And productivity-driven growth i…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:36 AM
1

What if you break up? Would you still spend time with the kid? Would you pay child support? Any male who does not automatically answer "yes absolutely will spend with their kid no matter what" is not a man in my book but a weak willed, cowardly loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:28 AM
11

I think they are great. From my experience most of the stereotypes are restricted to maybe 30% of single moms. Many I met are extremely different than the stereotypes repeated here by people who I suspect have only limited life experience. I used to thank all the fools that listened to Tom Leykiss about single moms because it made my job easier by weeding out the douchebag competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:25 AM
3

Let me know if the clueless ever provide you an answer to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:19 AM
2

The welfare state was formed by FDR, the hated enemy, in the 1930s. The idea that the welfare state was "formed in the 60s and 70s" is not correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:16 AM
2

China's one child policy was effective. In what ways was it effective? If you believe it was effective why did they end it after doing economic and demographic analysis?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 01:11 AM
1

Currently society does not "incentivize" anyone to become single mothers. And you also have to blame the "deadbeat dads" for evading their responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 12:59 AM
2

I have a friend who was the epitome of what the OP believes is impossible when he was in college. Absolutely obsessed with female singers, both big celebrity singers and two local female vocalists in college (one was in a punky lite band and the other more traditional). I would have rated the girls 6-7 but to him they were the hottest girls in school because they could sing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:51 PM
1

Interesting. I personally don't even notice things like the "door dance" or standing in the elevator. I think in my mid life, I just don't care about things like minor social norms anymore so I don't even notice them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:42 PM
3

I'd fuck Adele just because she was famous and I like her voice. If she looked exactly like that, even was that rich but was just a non-famous girl next door I would not be interested at all as she is not my type. But of course, examples that disprove the silly narratives on here just get ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:40 PM
1

Is it really that awkward though? On the elevator scale, is it more or less awkward than entering an elevator and facing inward?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:35 PM
2

LOL It sounds more like 1880 to me
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:20 PM
5

I knew a LOT Of men that were "sexually driven" by Beyonce. Her ass was legendary in a lot of hip hop circles. Methinks your comment reflects a strong cultural bias. I'm guessing you don't know many black and latino men do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:19 PM
4

Beyonce is an ugly male-looking woman and I don't think there are any male groupies, unless this is a trick question and you're going to claim trans queer gays are male Wow Where do you live?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:16 PM
3

Male groupies absolutely exist. Ever heard of Beyonce?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:11 PM
2

It doesn't. The relevant factors would be your wealth, looks, personality, what you are looking for, how jaded you are. Age in this case is literally 100% irrelevant. I doubt anyone on here could even tell the difference between 35 yo and 40 yo if they were dressed and groomed the same and had similar genetics. For example - a 40 yo leisure class millionaire who is in good shape from skiing around the world is going to have far more options than a chubby, financially stable 35 yo McDonalds store…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:05 PM
1

If you and a man get to the door at the same time, is there anything wrong with the man holding the door open? I honestly don't get the holding the door issue at all, from either side. Both sides seem to be making a simple gesture of politeness into some over-politicized nonsense its not about.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 06:03 PM
2

Roman Bacchanalians
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 05:51 PM
1

What's amusing is that what people consider "traditional" was only invented relatively recently by religious reactionaries to exert more control over the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/18 05:01 PM
3

Except its been happening since forever, long before modern America. Hardly a new phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/18 05:00 PM
1

No. its an expression of lust and desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 11:10 PM
2

Assuming I wanted to marry again and she fulfilled my actual criteria then sure. "N-count" and occupation would be completely irrelevant to me though. I don't care about either of those things if I was getting married again.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 06:40 PM
7

Whats wrong with cat ladies? They shouldn't be shamed. Now people with noisy birds? Those people should be shamed
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 02:47 PM
1

Its a far stronger criticism of classic theory than prototype theory though. I never said prototype theory is perfect, just much better than classical theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 03:30 PM
1

It was never my argument that classical theory is better as a whole. Then there is no disagreement here. Either you didn't explain yourself well, I didn't understand your point or a little of both. I already mentioned the example of bird and flight where prototype theory clearly handles an atypical example much better than classical theory where you have to either exclude flight from the necessary and sufficient conditions or exclude flight-less birds from the category. If you feel the classic t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 03:29 PM
1

I'm not even sure what you are arguing for anymore. I thought you were arguing for the classical theory against prototype theory. But then you linked Hofstadter's book which is really a different issue (its thesis seems to be analogy vs. categorization as the "core of cognition"). Prototype theorists never argued categorization is the core of cognition anyway. Its simply based on empirical and experimental evidence on how our brains actually categorize. So Hofstadter's argument is really a compl…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 03:07 PM
1

I haven't read the whole book obviously but from reading a few key passages I don't see anything yet that looks like Hofstadter believes that the classical theory is better than prototype theory. In fact it seems more like Hofstadter is simply expanding the concepts by bringing up points about contextual dependence which is valid. But if the criticism is that early prototype theory doesn't deal with contextual dependence enough then that criticism applies even more to the classical theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 03:00 PM
1

Not sure if you are just arguing to argue or you really don't understand. I can easily apply your criticism to your posts. You haven't really explained your point of view very well either. Its much simpler than you are trying to make it out. For instance, a penguin - in prototype theory is just an atypical member of the category. They are further away from the prototypical center. But in the classical theory - is "being able to fly" a necessary or sufficient condition for the category of bird? T…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 02:45 PM
1

Why would I spend hours typing out something when someone else already did a good job of that? If you don't want to put in the effort to reading then we are done here. If you want to link an academic paper critical of prototype theory I'd love to read that actually. Despite what you might think, you haven't even presented a coherent criticism at all. So an academic link would help here. As far as I understand about the theory; the main criticisms include an inability of categorization of concept…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 02:26 PM
1

http://www.academia.edu/1902195/Prototype_theory
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 02:19 PM
1

Because your examples are actually criticisms of necessary and sufficient conditions for categories. It's necessary conditions that have trouble handling birds that don't fly because that's typically one of the conditions for birds- to fly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 02:12 PM
3

The other guy insisited that men are never just attracted to women hotter than them. I said I am. I have never dated or even hooked up with a girl uglier than me. The notion that all men will screw any women that says yes is just wrong. I have turned down many women that weren't attractive enough for my picky standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 02:04 PM
1

Well if you are just call anyone presenting a counter example to your incorrect over generalization then there is no point discussing anything because you are just going to deny anything that doesn't fit your weird opinions I am already stating that I clearly violate your incorrect unscientific assumptions about "all men". Your arbitrary take on looks is actually irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 02:01 PM
1

Actually prototype theory and radial categories handle atypical members far better than strict necessary and sufficient conditions for categories but again , it seems you don't really understand what you are just denying.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 01:58 PM
0

I'm ugly. I have never dated an ugly girl. I would never get with an ugly girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 02:34 AM
1

Its funny because you started with the assertion that welfare causes single mothers. When challenged on that, you couldn't produce any actual evidence of your claim. Then you start with the personal insults and pull back from the actual claim you made. Well done there. Business school ha
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 11:45 PM
2

Men are not attracted only to those women who are above them in attractiveness. I've known plenty of men like that. In fact I am a man like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 11:08 PM
5

I've seen many men do that. Maybe some people here just aren't old enough to have witnessed this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 11:07 PM
1

Sure. Anyone can claim anything on the internet. Your posts make you sound like a high school dropout who just repeats Rush Limbaugh. If you ever want to have discussion without personal insults let me know. Or you can just go on whining about things that have no effect on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 11:00 PM
1

Absolutley. I've known many men who were hypergamous
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 10:57 PM
1

What is the category of "pro-rape" ? Do you mean rapists? I think you misunderstand prototype theory and radial categories as your examples do nothing to counter those theories. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1&q=prototype+theory+radial+categories+rosch&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&p=&u=%23p%3DXTrkrp73FA0J I would argue that most labels are overly reductionist and usually obfuscate a lot of important facts so their use should be highly limited in the first place. For instance I …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 10:37 PM
1

You sound like a high school dropout who gets his economics and politics from Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. Am I doing your ad hominem and personal insults correct? You're right there is no point in discussing if you are stuck in your imaginary world that is divorced from provable facts and logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 10:30 PM
1

If you think everything can be defined via prototype theory, That's not really what I said. I said categories can better be explained by prototype theory and radial categories. I don't really understand what your questions are supposed to mean. do you believe you can be a feminist yet pro-rape? I don't get what you mean here at all. Do you believe you can be an investment banker and a communist? Investment banker is a job title. Communist is a vague description that could mean anything from a gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 05:58 PM
1

Your conclusion does not follow from your premise. At all. I fail to even see your reasoning here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 05:50 PM
1

See I look at things fundamentally different. It looks like you are using necessary and sufficient conditions to define whether something Is or and only or Is Not post-modern. This is not a viewpoint I subscribe to nor is it the way our minds actually organize categories. I prefer to use Prototype theory and radial categories rather than a strict black/white necessary condition view (I can give you links later when I'm not on mobile). So keeping that in mind I don't even look at things the way y…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 04:58 PM
3

A bit like the no true scotsman fallacy. You listed four things in an earlier post. Denial of objective science was only one of the things you listed. In things like cultural relativism and not believing in objective moral I am absolutely post-modern. In things like philosophy of science I am not really "post-modern".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 04:14 PM
4

I'm not sure what you mean by "social studies". I want to add that the top 15 University I attended I took a number of social science courses (upper division and a few grad seminars) in sociology, psychology, American and European history and philosophy. None of them remotely resemble what you are implying here. Ever single courses used predicate logic, statistics, scientific experiments, historical method etc. Maybe you are referring to classes in the humanities (I have never heard of "social s…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 04:12 PM
2

I really only apply it to things like morality rather than science. I think it has a very small benefit to science in that research money can certainly be directed by narratives but I definitely don't go down the post-modern critique of science that I think you are meaning here - that objective facts don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 03:49 PM
3

Yes. Morality is relative IMO and certainly does not necessarily derive from religion (although religion can be good for some people)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 03:44 PM
2

Nothing to do with HuffPost, I never read that. My degree and work is in economics. The welfare mom stereotype you are obsessing over simply doesn't exist. You should take a look at how much in tax subsidies, tax breaks and other forms of corporate welfare as it vastly outnumbers the myth of the wicked welfare single moms. Go look up how much taxpayers like me subsidizes the corn ethanol industry for just one single example. 54% of Americans pay no federal income tax. That shows that 54% do not …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 03:29 PM
2

You realize that the stereotypical "welfare mom" is far, far less a drain on our tax dollars than much more nefarious forms of corporate welfare yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 10:53 PM
3

do you have a link to statistical evidence supporting this?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 10:25 PM
5

So its just your arbitrary beliefs then
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 09:30 PM
1

I would probably be flattered that someone thought I was attractive enough that people would pay me for sex or company. Not all prostitutes are attractive. In fact many are torn up
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 08:08 PM
4

Cut the welfare state and watch just how quickly the single motherhood rate drops You have any evidence for this policy suggestion?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 08:06 PM
3

1) Poor choice in mating 2) Irresponsible birth control 3) religion and other philosophical opposition to abortion or lack of access by authoritarian states to abortion 4) Any mix of 1-3
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 08:03 PM
6

like video games and listen to metal Weird first two things to mention. Neither one has anything to do with being a cool person in my opinion. Being a cool person is a state of mind. I've known a few cool girls that didn't play video games or listen to metal. Of course, I don't listen to metal either.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/18 06:27 PM
1

Not sure how to even reply to this weird scenario you just made up that is entirely outside the scope of the post in question.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/18 06:23 PM
1

How did her behavior show "cunty bad character"?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 03:53 PM
1

Maybe its just my culture, but even with male friends, if people are cooking dinner (or BBQ'ing) and you aren't bringing food, you bring the alcohol. I thought that was an eternal truth everyone knew.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 03:45 PM
3

(M) Guy was a complete fool. Did not deserve to get laid. Always bring a bottle of wine. Even if she doesn't ask for it. In fact, bring two bottles! EDIT: I should add that if situation was reversed and I was cooking dinner for a girl and she pulled the same thing this guy did, I would have kicked her to the curb as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 03:43 PM
1

I asked my sister about this, and she said that it's totally false. Women don't sort men into a "friend" or "sexual" box when they meet them. Many women will meet a man without any sexual charge/energy/context to the interaction, and then become sexually attracted to him as she gets to know him better and as learns more about him. My sister never met her LTR in a sexual way; she was actually more interested in his friend and then as she got to know him better her attraction toward him grew and s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 03:35 PM
3

All the time. I'd say around 1/3 of all men and women are hypergamous or desire to be hypergamous. Which seems like a lot but the majority of people aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 03:30 PM
1

fan fiction. phony story
/r/MGTOW15/04/18 03:27 PM
2

Exactly. /u/biggerdthanyou If they look distracted and not really into it, why would you continue instead of just taking a pause and then asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/18 02:15 PM
2

Who asks what someone is thinking during sex? That is very weird imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/18 02:14 PM
0

The Art of Seduction by Robert Greene Forget all the reddit red pill nonsense if you really want to up your game get Art of Seduction
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/18 01:07 PM
3

Nothing said here goes against what I am saying. Nor did I endorse chasing girls over chasing dreams. Here are some examples I have seen that show why many men with different goals choose the relationship strategy over not having one: A man likes sex and wants it. Is successful. Being single and "not worrying about sex" does not provide levels of access he wants for career nor does it guarantee the sex he wants. So he gets married and social climbs while still slaying pussy because everyone know…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 11:34 PM
1

Full stop. You’re wrong If you are already convinced you are 100% correct without presenting any evidence why are you even asking a question on a subreddit? This isn't even a CMV post.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 11:17 PM
1

I'll probably regret this because I won't get any evidence but: What do you believe the most efficient strategy for sex/companionship for the average male in the first world countries c.2018?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 11:09 PM
2

You’re overthinking this. An average looking man can’t be insecure and receive casual sex. An average looking woman can be insecure as fuck and still get laid. You're underthinking it. Absolutely the man can if he has other things going for him and his targets are not unrealistic. Its obviously a negative that needs other positive traits to overcome it but I have seen it happen at various levels. I could go far deeper on this one but you seem to have your mind convinced so good luck
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 11:05 PM
3

For the non-rich/famous/powerful its typically the most efficient strategy to get both consistent sex and/or companionship in a stable fashion for a wide variety (though not all) of sexual/relationship goals.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 11:00 PM
3

Insecure men can attract women if they have other traits that are appealing. I gave you examples of two men documented to be insecure who attracted women due to their other traits. I am fairly certain that your examples of women who are insecure that you say are still attractive fit this exact same formula - they have other qualities that outweigh the natural unattractiveness of being insecure even if its on a smaller level than celebrities.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 10:25 PM
2

I've seen a lot of insecure men be successful with women. If they have other traits the women are attracted to its just seen as moody or emo or temperamental or whatever. Kurt Cobain was an insecure man. Donald Trump is an insecure man for just two examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 10:16 PM
16

Consistent sex and consistent companionship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 10:09 PM
5

I think you are confusing biology with culture. Confidence is a human trait that is important for success for both men and women even if masculine and feminine confidence operates differently. How a particular society or individual might culturally perceive certain examples in each sex is a different matter. Insecurity is a turn off long term in both sexes irrespective of what Tom Leykis advises regarding how women with low self-esteem are easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 10:05 PM
4

I don't think confidence is a masculine trait. I think you are only thinking of certain types of confidence in the male form. Female confidence manifests a little different. Female confidence is more subtle than male forms.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 09:17 PM
0

I'd rather just rub one out than hook up with a girl over a certain ugly/obese level. I never personally related to the concept of "slump busting". I'd rather have sex once with a hot girl in a year than 100 times with ugly/fat girls but I know I am on the picky side. I've had friends that think completely different and wanted to bang as many girls as possible regardless of how fat or ugly they were.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 06:28 PM
1

Of the studies listed there the most interesting might be the one about female contraception and how the pill basically reverses MHC profile preferences. I can definitely see some problems there as women on the pill would be attracted to the wrong type of men (from biological perspective). It also interestingly might help explain some experience I've had. Really more people should be aware of this and it should be worked into dating advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 06:14 PM
1

That makes sense. It definitely sounds like a valid case of an exception to the OP's theory. Do you think it will stay open when the distance closes and you finish college?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 05:25 PM
0

Are you saying attraction/revulsion to the natural scent of a person is an indication of immune system compatibility? Do you have a reference for that? I have never heard of that before in stuff about pheromones and scent. I have noticed that my long-term partners always smelled good to me whereas some girls I just messed around with once or twice I wasn't attracted to their natural scent (nothing to do with hygiene in these cases).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 05:15 PM
1

Is it just a relatively casual relationship then? like no talk of marriage? For me I had a few successful LDR a number of years ago when I was traveling a lot more because they were casual. There was no real expectation from either of us that it was leading toward marriage, rather must more like mutually enjoyed fun so we both dated others at times but would always share and tell each other about it. (this was before Facebook and dating apps even existed though)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 05:03 PM
1

Make sure you known what you want. Are you sure you even know what you want in a LTR?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 04:56 PM
1

Is it fair to say the only reason you are in an open relationship is because of the distance factor?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 04:53 PM
2

This doesn't sound like either of you are really interested in an open relationship and you are just using that label to perhaps lessen the pressure/issues with long distance relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 04:46 PM
2

Depends on the circumstance. Sometimes its necessary, othertimes it comes off as weak and clingy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 04:41 PM
3

Im sure men have friends, but there are certain things men don’t feel comfortable expressing to other men? I never had that problem but then I took hallucinogens and empathogens with my male friends so maybe we had an easier time being real and deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/18 07:35 PM
1

Get rich. Be funny. Have a fit body.Be hung. Be cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 10:44 PM
1

You are making the assertion, then coming to a definitive conclusion based on extremely weak evidence. I haven't made any assertion about the sexual preferences of men from a society thousands of years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 10:32 PM
2

No. It would turn into a tax scam.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 10:28 PM
1

Name ONE obese woman who cant find a boyfriend, or a guy to just have casual sex with. You probably cant really name any. https://img.memecdn.com/Thats-why-I-am-not-a-Liverpool-fan_o_10472.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 10:22 PM
1

You can't cherry pick some ancient fossils and then extrapolate to conclude you know the reason for the statue is to somehow depict ideal female sexual form. That's a massive stretch and seems like you are just projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 10:18 PM
1

How is this common? What stories about "fat women and their value in the marketplace" are you even talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 10:08 PM
2

(1) men tend to be neurologically spergier What does this even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 10:02 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 06:52 PM
-1

How are you defining drug/alcohol abuse? What do you mean by "committed a crime"? Traffic violations? Ticket for smoking a joint? Shoplifted in high school? For promiscuity over 10 lifetime partners is not a lot at all depending on how old you are. Personally I don't view number of lifetime partners as important in any way so I will just remove that "red flag" as I don't see it as meaningful. I also don't see "had an abortion" as a red flag either. That seems like some judgmental religious rubbi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 06:49 PM
1

Are you paying for all the weed for the broke artist?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/18 06:46 AM
1

As an undergrad? Hardly relevant when in the 80s she was on Wal Mart Board of Directors and part of the union suppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/18 12:38 AM
3

100% transactional goods for service exchange. His money for her sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/18 12:34 AM
1

How are you defining "common sense"? How are you defining "political correctness"?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 07:28 PM
1

It's an invariable conclusion to the realization that loyalty is not a shared currency between the sexes, and that the nuclear family is a male value system. Interesting. I look forward to reading your post
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 07:27 PM
1

high end male prostitute
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 11:01 PM
2

Statistics show that children ages 1-5 who are separated from their mother for 20 hours or more per week show 100% of the same symptoms as children who have been abandoned. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 11:00 PM
1

This is based on a whole lot of silly unsupported assumptions. Its impossible for any man to love and understand any women? LMAO ok And I don't know where the /rTRP denizens live but in big cities like LA and NYC, men are just as hypergamous as women. That is one of the odd r/TRP dogmas that four decades of living on this planet contradicts for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 10:51 PM
1

Thats because of your powered butt cheeks though ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 09:43 PM
1

There are far too many out of wedlock children and far too few fathers who want to stick around and raise them. This is an interesting point. Does the r/TRP emphasize mindsets that lead to men abandoning their responsibility as fathers?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 09:42 PM
3

For the physical yes, its why I brought it up. I mean they could have been lying of course and maybe the guy was too broke but I have never heard a girl say a guy was too rich to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 03:20 AM
19

I known plenty of women who think different guys are too tall, too muscular and even some with dicks too big. But never met a women who thought a guy was too rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 03:03 AM
1

It is an exit cost which women can inflict at more or less their discretion. Sure its like .000001% rather than absolute 0. The probability is still far too low to be a meaningful decision making factor. I don't know anyone in decades that ever had something like that happen and thats hundreds of examples. You'd have to provide some statistical evidence otherwise I think you are being excessively paranoid and delusional as this is a great example of cognitive bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 02:59 AM
1

she still has the ability to easily get away with falsely accusing him of rape or abuse out of a desire for revenge. You said exit costs. An exceptionally rare instance is not a valid example of exit costs. What percentage of ended relationships do you actually imagine end with such crazy accusations? This sounds like a case where you are vastly overrating the probability of an exceptionally low percentage event because you read some story online.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 01:12 AM
2

How does a man have exit costs in just a bf/gf relationship with no kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 05:53 PM
4

23 is a bit young for anyone to commit that isn't a bit extreme on the monogamy scale. Not sure why you are so worried about locking someone down into monogamy so young. I don't buy into the bullshit about "N-counts" but most 23 yo girls, its silly for you to expect them to be ready for long term monogamy. Also a bit weird to me that you are that focused on that as well if she was your first real partner. Seems really weird to be rushing into long term monogamy commitments with your first partne…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 05:45 PM
1

A lot of people have better game in person than over Tinder. A lot of girls are more receptive in person than over Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 06:51 PM
1

Personally, I found the small towns to be filled with woman-on-woman judgement and one-upsmanship. Yup. The small town I grew up in was heavily WASP and extremely judgemental towards anything non-WASP or even other religions. To the point I don't even think some of them realized how bigoted they sounded because they thought it was all normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 06:46 PM
1

lol you're funny (not sarcastic)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 08:33 PM
1

Ok that makes more sense. At least you don't sound like a racist like the person in the other thread so I wish you well :)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 08:18 PM
1

that white people commit gun crime lol Stephen Paddock says hi The genocide of the former Yugoslavia also sadly says hi white people commit murder just as much as any other race.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 07:30 PM
0

This post smells like BS. Your friend is a "big shot shot international lawyer" which means she already has a Juris Doctorate yet you say she is "writing her PhD"? Sounds suspicious but not entirely implausible as some people get their JD and PhD at the same time. But then you say this guy was a scientists being headhunted by CERN but he doesn't even have a bachelors degree? That is not very believable at all. Theoretical physics is not something you can "teach yourself" even if you are a a "gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 07:24 PM
1

It could be one component for sure but no attraction rules apply to everyone. Personally though I am this way. I am generally not attracted to girls with the same genetic combination as myself for instance and attracted to other races almost exclusively. Now that I think most of my friends are similar, white friend married to hispanic, black friend married to asian and indian friend married to a white/islander mix.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 04:41 PM
2

So I am not good enough. The takeaway I was going for is that everyone has their own specific things. You can't get hung up because any one individual isn't into your thing. Look for people that match you. Its a proactive thing not a reactive thing. If you are looking for religious dudes with careers then go to church events (multiple churches not just one) and eventually you will likely meet a lot more people that match you than just looking in general online.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/18 12:22 AM
1

not necessarily a positive how you phrased it. Someone that cooks but complains about it is worse than someone who doesn't cook that's cool what major? to be blunt, the people you are trying to attract are the ones to determine if you are cute or not. You can of course determine if they are hot or not but you can't tell people you are hot. They either think you are or not. See 4 What religion? Do you need someone in your same religion? Either way this does limit your options as it will be a deal…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/18 12:11 AM
1

Your mom should have a moderator that is a red piller /s couldn't resist the easy set-up
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/18 12:03 AM
1

while Europe is just taking any immigrant who comes forward with many of those having been criminals or lowlives in their country if origin, so they become low like in Europe. Is this actually true? Can an American just decide to move to Europe and settle there? I thought especially in countries like Germany and UK that was not the case at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 04:23 PM
1

I don't think it's societal expectation it's natural biology for men to be pursuer
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 04:06 PM
0

Meh. Reading Robert Greene leads to a greater improved response from females and society in general than following limited and narrow minded /r/Redpill beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 04:02 PM
2

Disagree. It depends on mindset. I had a lot of fun being used for my body in my early 20s when that was all I cared about. Two people can both want casual sex and 'use'each other without one wanting some long term thing ya know
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 03:59 PM
3

This doesn't make sense. Your conclusion does not logically follow from your premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 03:55 PM
4

23 is not the ideal age to get married in today's world. Anyone trying to marry a 23 year old is not very smart
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 03:54 PM
1

Indeed. One thing I learned was that not every group of "friends" was like my long term friends and family. I remember telling one guy I met years ago that if he was worried about his "friends" hitting on his girlfriend they weren't his friends to begin with! Also I should clarify that my harsh first post was based on what I heard about Mike Pence not being in the same room with a women alone in his job as VP. That level is what I don't get. But for instance I completely agree that say going to …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 07:10 AM
1

While our viewpoints are different its interesting for me to read about this as it makes me think. One thing that might affect my view is that my group of male friends and I all have very different tastes in women. Like very different. Among my close friends there has never been an incident (and I am late 30s) or two of us even being attracted to the same women. You know the whole classic story of two friends that meet a girl and both like her? That's completely foreign to me and my close friend…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 06:54 AM
3

Thanks for the reply but I have a very different perspective in one sense. Why test your willpower if it's not strictly necessary? Why do you think every situation of a man hanging out with a women is a test of willpower? I can think of dozens of situations where me hanging out with a co-worker, college classmate, elementary school friend, etc where there is literally no test of willpower. Are age differences relevant here? If your husband had a meeting with a 60 year old women are you really wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 06:31 AM
1

A great many RP-minded people think that it's impossible for men and women to be platonic friends. And thats where /r/redpill people are 100% categorically wrong. I have plenty of women friends with no sexual attraction and all my friends have friends of the opposite sex where there is no sexual temptation on either side. I feel its a very naive, sheltered and narrow minded viewpoint that believes men and women cannot be platonic friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 06:16 AM
5

So, thoughts from the peanut gallery? Would you be happy if your SO followed the Billy Graham rule? Would you be willing to follow it if someone requested it of you? Absolutely not, to me or my SO. Its one of the silliest ultra-religious things I have ever heard. Its also based on a really ignorant premise - that human beings are completely incapable of controlling animal desires with any member of the opposite sex. Absurd! Trust is the key to a healthy relationship and this silly "rule" is base…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 06:04 AM
1

Prisoner's Dilemma is far too simplistic to apply to sexual theory. You aren't using the right type of game to model it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/18 05:22 PM
1

That typically comes from naive teenagers misunderstanding why the high school hottie wants the hot guy even though he is an asshole. Its not because he is an asshole, its because of his other traits. Traits that probably contributed to him being overconfident.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 06:08 PM
2

Do you find it difficult to separate out sex as something that happens as a result of attraction; and not good deeds? No its attraction. Did you ever believe that sex or attraction was something that was rewarded because you "deserve it" for being a good person? Not in vanilla but yes in some specific dom/sub dynamics. Are you disheartened that sex is a manifestation of attraction and not charity or altruism? Charity or altruism? wtf no. Those have nothing to do with sex like that. Makes zero se…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 06:05 PM
2

Almost every rock star/musician. They are typically not very traditionally attractive nor are they fit like an athlete.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 04:14 PM
1

All the bolds and caps make this hard to read. If you just wrote normally it would be far more readable. I am not really sure what your point is. That Roy Moore taking a 14 year old to a cabin as a 30 year old and coercing her into sexual acts is not sexual harassment? That Franken groping random women is okay? So if you get groped by a stranger its not harassment to you if its not at work? Do you like being groped by strangers?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/17 11:28 PM
1

The OP argument is rubbish to begin with though. Trying to search a twitter specific term is not going to show up on google trends in the way you think. You would have to track twitter hashtags not google searches of a twitter hashtag.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/17 01:14 AM
1

Uh Person of the Year was started in 1927. Can you please show me the twitter and google data on Charles Lindbergh from 1927?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 06:33 PM
2

This comparison makes no sense. No one is searching #MeToo on Google ffs, its a Twitter tag!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 06:31 PM
1

Her objectivism ends up functioning very similar to the Austrian school's praxeology. Not entirely sure what you mean by your statement. I wouldn't let anyone manage my retirement personally but if I was they would have to be both 100% trustworthy and also extremely knowledgeable of investments. Not sure how many "self-identified socialists" tend towards money management career paths but I am guessing its very few.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 06:24 PM
1

complete lack of regard for like economics Like Ayn Rand?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 12:31 AM
2

Yeah fair enough, I definitely agree with where you are coming from. I just wanted the caveat there because when and where I grew up was a little like the original book Friday Night Lights (not the fictional TV show) and some of the HS football coaches were awful human beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 12:24 AM
1

I agree up to a point. Having kids engage in group activities (could be sports but doesn't have to be) before teenage years is definitely a good thing. In high school and beyond though it really depends on the kid. Could be good but it also could be a bad thing. Sometimes the rural American athletics culture reinforces and hides some very dark things - like Jerry Sandusky at Penn State.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 12:01 AM
6

Its possible to achieve the exact same psychological results as "dread game" without all the negative connotations. For some reason r/theredpill seems to have tunnel vision in thinking only one specific set of tactics works and that tactic is always based on really basic level psychological games.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/17 07:20 PM
1

Mined not bought
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/17 07:05 PM
2

this right here OP
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 09:56 PM
2

"blue pill" is a red pill concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 09:52 PM
8

I got Bitcoin.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 09:41 PM
1

My problem is that I've seen a number of people and outlets that (intentionally or just through carelessness) wrongly conflate unwanted advances with harassment even though they aren't the same thing. Can you provide the source material?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 06:47 PM
1

Chad is a meme created by 4chan. Is that true? What's the history behind it? Never heard anyone in real life ever use that term until a year or so ago on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 06:44 PM
2

You are missing the point. Just because the public mainstream view is one way does not mean that there aren't dozens or hundreds of pockets of communities where that behavior is just shrugged at. You did say "never true anywhere at any time". That is what is blatantly false. It is true in many local communities/institutions and businesses. Also I don't see "zero tolerance" with Roy Moore. You still have a lot of people in Alabama that will just look the other way and vote for him out of blind pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 02:49 AM
3

That does ignore some important details though. Most of the Stanford guards did not exhibit any cruel or unusual behavior, often being friendly and doing favors for the prisoners. The most notorious guard, nicknamed John Wayne, explained that he was simply trying to emulate Strother Martin's character from Cool Hand Luke. Other analysts have found it difficult to support Zimbardo's conclusions, since the allegedly poisonous environment did not affect most participants, and the most notorious par…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 02:22 AM
1

Except that was never true anywhere in America at any time in the 70s, before or after. You can't be serious with this. All the Hollywood outings from NBC to Fox to movie studies. On university campuses with Jerry Sandusky for decades at Penn State the most famous example. The Church scandals and molester priests being covered up until recently. Rural towns like in Alabama with Roy Moore (who is on record stating that "God's law" should trump US civil law). Its pretty clear there are a lot of su…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 02:12 AM
-1

Only men I know that said that were in a deluded hippie phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 10:36 PM
1

As a father, its easier to teach a son not to be a rapist than teach a daughter how to avoid all rapists.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 10:29 PM
2

Its not. Its wrong to use your status to force yourself on people who don't want it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/17 06:25 AM
2

I don't know, some women I know definitely got hotter into their 30s. Usually a combination of genetics and being more comfortable with their sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 02:24 AM
1

Why would you assume that on tinder? Tinder has always been just a hook up app. It was designed to be the heterosexual version of Grindr - the "just for sex not dating app . The anti-Eharmony, anti-match.com app". Eharmony and Match are more for people who want to read bios and date whereas tinder was always for casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/17 05:52 PM
1

There is no data collected on percentage of marriages that fall into those other categories. Can you provide evidence they are only a "small minority" as you claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/17 05:45 PM
1

not relevant to Western cultures. if you think political marriages, trophy wife marriages and marriages for immigration are "not relevant" to the West then I humbly submit you have an extremely naive and sheltered view of the West and how marriages actually play out. I can't even count how many of those three I've known personally in the US and Europe so I think you don't really know whats going on behind closed doors.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 10:48 PM
1

42
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 06:12 AM
1

MMV and RMV are the same to me. Most LTRs have a natural progression to marriage. They are different because certain types of marriages are not at all dependent on LTR: arranged marriages, political marriages, trophy wife exchange marriages, immigration marriages, etc. Of course for me, all those values are ranges rather than specific numbers as local culture and many other things can affect the range.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 06:11 AM
1

What is the 'proof' of SMV but not RMV and MMV?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 06:08 AM
3

I am a male and I don't view women as inferior at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 06:42 PM
2

People in general are hypergamous. Exactly. Its old news that both men and women bigger, better deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 06:39 PM
2

I have no idea when the old concept of "bigger better dealing someone" turned into some quaint idea that only women do it because men do it just as much as women. Bigger, better dealing someone or what the kids today label as "hypergamy" is something that men and women have both done for a long time at least in the cosmopolitan west.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 06:33 PM
1

The Deuce is a great show. Highly recommend it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 05:58 AM
1

its not a cult, its just dogma
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 02:03 AM
2

alpha physically gamma or whatever status wise exhibiting whiny beta-ish behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 03:49 AM
1

I don't think there is a most generalization. From my experience there are basically three general stages that people get married. But I would like to see if the data bears out this pattern I notice from people I know. The high school/college sweetheart marrier ages - Marriage 19-23ish The play the field then settle down quick ages - Marriage 27-32 The late marriers - Marriage 37+ Some people marry in all three stages.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 03:42 AM
1

significant number of men. If you want me to believe this is anywhere above 10% or even 5% you'll need some evidence otherwise it looks like you are over-exaggerating.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 03:36 AM
1

How does one reprogram oneself with the aid of drugs? This is a good start http://www.whale.to/c/Prometheus%20Rising.pdf Wouldn't some drugs accomplish this eg. hallucinogens better than others? Absolutely. I was really only referring to hallucinogens and empathogens. Though-- what is the actual mechanism that enables one to effectively change themselves while under the influence? You can check out the pdf book I linked from Robert Anton Wilson. It relates to the fact hallucinogens allow peak ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/17 03:21 AM
1

Nope. That's a passive aggressive thing to say. I have to defend my self again? No idea what you are talking about? Nothing I said was intended in any passive-aggressive fashion. I probably was not very articulate.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/17 03:17 AM
1

Aren't some people just naturally cool without any "self journey?" That's an interesting question because the people I knew personally that seemed naturally cool tended to have cool parents/families/siblings so I really think its a learned state of mind to at least some degree. Some people probably do have naturally cool dispositions but how much nature and nurture for any one person who knows? The journey is basically discovering the "cool" version of yourself. Find your inner Tyler Durden. IMO…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 10:50 PM
1

My claim is that fat women are not attractive to most men. If you want to reference men with fat fetishes you need to provide some data because common sense suggests that men that want fat women is a small minority. If you think the percentage of men with fat fetishes is greater than say 5-10% of all men then I need to see some proof of that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 10:14 PM
2

I'll take this over this any day Girls don't need to 'lift' to be 10/10
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 10:11 PM
5

It's a massive factor in attractiveness and can help overcome any kind of deficiency a person has. Its also an aphrodisiac. Like you mentioned drugs can be one way for a person to open the doors of perception and realize that most people have the potential to be cool if they are not d bags. Of course being cool requires a self journey which some people can't achieve.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 09:01 PM
1

When you make a ridiculous over generalization without any supporting evidence but your own opinion that is the only counter needed. Feel free to provide evidence that fat women are attractive to most men
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:52 PM
3

Women don't have to lift to look good. In fact "lifting" is not an activity I would want any girl I date to engage in. Cardio is fine but women lifting? Hell no.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:40 PM
1

that I look like I don't take anything seriously and like I'm a lone wolf. Do you mean you don't have any real passions or hobbies or just you don't like joining groups or social organizations? I find your comments interesting because they don't match my experience when I was bartender. I noticed a lot of 'average' looking girls get hit on while as I mention some more attractive girls would not get hit on. The only girls I observed that would get ignored were the fat ones. How do you describe ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:31 PM
1

Supposedly the golden age of online dating was the late 90s. Ah the heyday of AOL Chat rooms. The good old days. Makes me nostalgic haha Meeting girls online then was nothing like today. There were no dating sites or apps. You just went into AOL Chats that interested you. The ratio was close to 50-50 then so you just start talking to girls and then IM'ing ones you talk to. Many people would have pics on their profiles and everyone I met used real pics. Before "catfishing" was invented for the ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:20 PM
1

Honest question, do you have resting bitch face? I knew a girl who was fairly hot, dressed well, but didn't get approached because she just naturally had resting bitch face and it put people off from approaching her. Some women give off cold vibes and that will deter men from hitting on them even if they are fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:16 PM
1

Do you live in Trumpland?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:11 PM
3

It's pretty damn hard for a woman to be (perceived as) unattractive. No its not. At least not in America with all the obese people. For places like Hungary or Japan I'd agree its hard for women to be ugly. But America? Hell no, ugly women all over especially if you live in Trump voting states.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:08 PM
1

In some sense all women are attractive to most men is true though. Even fat women. Lol. No way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:04 PM
1

No one likes extremely neurotic extremely introverted unmotivated non-ambitious ugly people. What percentage of the population do you imagine really falls into this category where are just a 0 in every possibly imaginable category? I can't say I met even one person in decades that falls into this description.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 07:27 PM
6

The author of the article seems at the same time extremely picky and also very needy and high maintenance. That comes off just from the writing style. Needy and picky are not traits that attract members of the opposite sex. Also sounds like she is not looking in the right places for LTR if she was using dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 12:44 AM
1

I can agree with muchof that. I do get your point about the sub not being exactly representative of the overall concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 11:16 PM
2

Fair enough but the_Donald definitely co-opted Red Pill terminology as their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 10:39 PM
1

Yeah that's not a good analogy but I get what you are trying to say. TRP is more like Art of Seduction for Dummies ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 10:31 PM
1

Convicted child rapist getting so many matches as well That is misleading. His profile makes it sound like he got popped for STATUATORY rape which is completely different than saying "child rapist" as if he was a kiddie molester.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 10:16 PM
8

where are liberal/sjw/lefty/progressive views considered masculine or to go with masulinity? All the NFL players who kneeled. They are called cuck/SJW and worse by r/the_Donald yet in everything but perceived "social views" they are pretty much alpha/masculine/Red Pill ideal. I'd say most women would probably consider LeSean McCoy more masculine than Donald Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 10:12 PM
3

If you were talking relationships then you might be right but for Tinder its all one night stands and a lot of people (men and women) will ignore unfavorable political/social views for a ONS that would be deal breakers for a LTR
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 10:06 PM
1

I don't think being attractive alone makes up for a having a host of undesirable traits but being attractive + rich/powerful and then you might be on to something
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 10:01 PM
2

This type of advice isn't limited to The Red Pill. Art of Seduction makes basically all the same points and more and that generally isn't considered "TRP".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 09:59 PM
5

Based on the images and average in Women 2 pic, then all the women in Women 1 would be above average. They all look more fit than the ones in pic 2
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 09:51 PM
1

people either change or they die before they can change
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 06:32 PM
1

Cristiano Ronaldo is called feminine due to his mannerisms rather than his actual physical features. Like he preens about for interviews, he often wears clothes that only gay men or runway fashionistas would ever wear, he literally changes his hair style at half time of some matches and he sometimes has a very effeminate way of speaking and moving.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 06:29 PM
2

This is one of those imaginary unicorn thoughts. Like the world would be a better place if no one tried to screw anyone else over in business. Sure, it might be true, but its just completely unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 08:07 PM
2

I think it says more about the people whining about some imagined "guilting" going on than their comments say anything about just another in a long line of stunts by charity to attempt to atttract attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 07:41 PM
2

Do you believe making men walk in heels helps sexual assault victims? No, but the money raised from the fundraiser can do good Is this fundraiser just an attempt to humiliate men? No. Just another in a long line of PR stunts to attract attention and it looks like it worked since you are posting about it on Reddit. A boring fundraiser wouldn't attract media attention. Creative stunts like this do attract attention for charity. Is it unfair that the term "men's sexualized violence against women" i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 07:36 PM
1

Of course hot sluts win the sexual market. If TRP says different they are ignorant. WTF wants to marry a virgin anyhow, ewww
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 05:16 AM
1

Women that like Ayn Rand are a great example of this phenom
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:55 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:53 AM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:53 AM
1

True. Middle class white men losing their advantages and privilege they often see as some some weird thing when in reality all that is happening is balancing the scales and them losing their undeserved advantages in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:51 AM
2

I find it odd that you make up lies about "dead silence" from protesters, then act like they are 'false protests' whatever that is supposed to mean and now you say you dont care about real protesters. Hard to follow this twitter/conservative talk radio mindset since its so irrational
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 10:58 PM
2

I understand this is your subjective opinion. But the facts do not support your subjective opinion as reality. A few paid agitators (which the GOP has also done) is hardly the "false protest" stuff you are making up out of thin air. And you are also alienating millions of real protesters and denying them a voice based on misleading and disingenuous subjective opinion. Clearly you extremely partisan biased. But its nice that you deny tens of millions of people a voice because you think they are a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 10:34 PM
2

Bit misleading your link is: "planting paid agitators at campaign events for Republican candidate Donald Trump" Planting a few "paid agitators" is not really 'paying people to protest'. The way you stated it made it sound like you believed the hundreds of thousands more people at protests on Saturday than showed up for Trump's inauguration were all "paid protesters". Also, you are in denial if you don't think the GOP every plants "paid agitators" Democrat events. After 8 yr of dead silence the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 10:28 PM
2

And they pay people to protest. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 11:17 PM
1

Some men are hypergamy and some are not. Some women are hypergamy and some are not. Not really any different between genders. Just depends on the goal of the person. Upper class men for instance go hypergamy until they find a suitable rich women from strong family or the hottest pure trophy wife. Trump is great example of hypergamy for men where he continually ditches wives when they get old and trades up for a newer model. Lower class, uneducated men with six packs might hypergamy simply for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 07:11 PM
1

The sluts they shame aren't the ones putting out out for them ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 07:07 PM
1

how is one person getting sex related to the "wellbeing of others" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/17 03:33 AM
6

jealous rage? guy can't get laid so he gets bitter
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/17 03:31 AM
2

Can't believe people waste their time writing meaningless posts like this
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/17 03:26 AM
0

Can't believe people waste their time writing pointless posts like this
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/17 03:26 AM
2

All I can think of when you make this post are Hanging Chad, Fat Chad and Pregnant Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/16 09:54 PM
3

How did the names Chad and Stacy get associated with these stereotype character personas? Just about every Chad and Stacy I ever met were the opposite of the stereotype people here associate them with.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/16 07:21 AM
1

It wasn't bizarre. His family was repeatedly threatened. And the threats were considered quite legitimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 06:13 AM
1

Pretty simple since his opponent was a woman who famously stayed married to a sexist, womanizer whom she defended just to further her own career.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 04:42 PM
1

Then I have a hard time believing you have actually witnessed more divorces from "beta bux" than failed high school alpha Al Bundys reliving the glory days of their high school little pond alphahood. Your anecdotes are no more valid than mine or anyone else. My view is supported by the fact that divorce rates decrease the later people wait to get married. Marriages among high school sweethearts tend to fail far more than 30+ year olds that get married. Hence, more failed high school alphas getti…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 09:56 PM
1

Because I live in the real world not the internet echo chambers of TRP crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 09:49 PM
4

So I contend that what TRP describes is generally true for most of the women in the SMP that most men encounter, and the women of PPD are outliers by simple self-selection bias. You are falling victim to the exact same fallacy you just accused others of using. Could easily say the hardcore red pillers are actually the outliers with self-selection bias. What you see in your anecdotal "SMP" is not representative of the wider world.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 05:27 PM
1

You seem to have a very distorted view of the world. Do you believe every single man also jumps into bed with every single women that he can sleep with? because if you believe this, your beliefs do not match reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 05:12 PM
1

Now you make the illogical assumption that all these men are "beta husbands" rather than the more typical deadbeat "former high school alpha" that a lot of girls who end up getting divorced had married. Failed alphas are more likely to get divorced than rich beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 05:08 PM
1

The funny thing is that the deluded red pill guys don't seem to realize that a huge chunk of women that marry rich/nerdy guys actually get better sex than with the vanilla construction worker with abs.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 05:05 PM
1

Agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 11:33 PM
1

Trump and Hilary are both ruthless, power hungry fascists. Of course they finish ahead of nice competent people like Bernie and Kasich.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 11:27 PM
0

The clintons supported some of the most fascist policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 11:24 PM
1

Indeed these are not just two of the worst candidates they are two of the worst possible candidates of all time. They both make Nixon look like a saint.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 11:23 PM
1

Dont know about any of that. I have seen an insane amount of vitriol from Hilary supporters starting right at the top with Clinton cronies like Albright trying to insult and shame young women voting for Bernie. Clinton supoorters have been every bit as bad as Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 11:19 PM
1

With sexual attraction there is nothing beyond personal tastes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/16 07:43 PM
1

Ive seen it happen so many times your comment is just nonsensical to me. I regularly rate girls 8s that friends think are 5s and vice versa. Many girls that American culture and those Santa Barbara shooter red pill types think are 9s yet they are just boring, typical blonde soriority 5s to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/16 07:40 PM
6

BP men and women believe that the man shouldn't proceed with an uninvited approach, an uninvited touch, or an uninvited kiss. In essence, men need to be afraid/ashamed of their sexuality when they are around women. Where do you get this idea? In my years bartending I probably witnessed hundreds of guys get rejected and no one was ever shamed. Your whole premise doesn't match my decades of experience at all. No idea where this "men get shamed for getting rejected" idea came from but its pretty ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/16 07:38 PM
1

Its all meaningless because its too subjective except when looking at extremes. A girl you think is an 8 I might think is a 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/16 05:17 PM
1

What are pink and green pills? Pink = fuck everything? Green = just get stoned?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/16 09:47 AM
3

It is my belief that in the past it was easier to discern the ‘promiscuous’ women from the ‘chaste’ women. Now? Not so much. Nah. At least not from surface. Many promiscuous women have hidden very cleverly in a chaste facade. Throughout history.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/16 09:45 AM
2

Yeah this is all just useless bullshit. I have seen literally dozens maybe hundreds of examples in my life that run contrary to all this nonsense. I can go walk to bars and restaurants and find examples against your unsupported claims. So you are just totally wrong in respect to reality. Have fun living in your fake "manosphere" or wherever you got all that garbage from.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 10:08 PM
7

No. Just no. I am not sure if you are being sarcasric or trolling but this is 100% the worst advice i have ever read on here regarding any topic. "Precum" can happen even with guys fully in control and even without knowing. And despite the slang term , it can easily get someone pregnant. This is very ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 05:30 PM
11

The issue isnt that hypergamy exists , the issue is that TRP seems to hold the unscientific and frankly childish view that all women are hypergamous and no men are. That is also being willfully stupid. Reality is probably somewhere around 1/3 of BOTH men and women are hypergamous. This can change with local culture. LA is a far more hypergamy based than midwest towns
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 05:09 PM
1

Well your comment about faces is based on an unscientific sample so I can't take your blanket assertions seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 01:36 AM
1

I do not believe Hilary will appoint Justices that are less 'pro-business'.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 11:32 PM
0

meh, neither will actually appoint a Justice that strays too far from established norms. Its a red herring from both parties to keep their base loyal. I don't buy that argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 11:31 PM
1

Your link doesn't prove anything especially without understanding the sample size. I could select a bunch of pictures of black women whose features are closer to the golden mean and a bunch of American white girls whose features are much further away from the golden mean. That doesn't prove anything. Also your entire argument ignores bodies of which most ethnic groups have more pleasing proportions than American white girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 11:28 PM
1

Sounds like the most subjective personally biased assertion I have read on this subreddit. BTW whats your ethnic background?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 12:16 AM
1

well then don't assert opinion as fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/16 06:53 PM
1

This is way off. The preference for lighter skin blacks has everything to do with cultural, privilege and power structures in the history of the Americas, nothing to do with biology. You are making things up in regards to facial symmetry. Most studies on facial preferences either show a preference for the same race or mixed-race. There is NO across the board preference for white or preference against black. WASP girl's bodies tend to be less appealing from an evolutionary biology perspective - h…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/16 06:51 PM
1

Kim Kardashian has the features of a black woman, with a nice ass that big and her hips. No she has the features of an Armenian women. Africans weren't the only genetic pool with hourglass curves and actual round asses ya know
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/16 06:46 PM
1

First the reason I don't like using alpha or beta this way is because it doesn't really accurately describe most people. Sure, there is a tiny minority that might be the stereotypically alpha or beta but most people aren't either one. And I don't find using alpha or beta as useful or meaningful way of analyzing actions or applyingthat dichotomy to human behavior. If it works for you go for it! But for me trying to analyze and fit behaviors into alphas beta is banal and ultimately too reductionis…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/16 06:32 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Drinking_Age_Act Its been a slow culturally shift towards discouraging drinking on campuses since then.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 06:24 PM
2

Whats this then? A red herring. Irrelevant to whether or not in modern civilization men and women are both relatively equally hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 06:22 PM
1

Lets leave out the victim being drunk for the time being as its more your view on alcohol and the rapist that matters to your title. The victim being drunk is a different issue and not really what your title and OP suggests. A portion of men would ignore signals to stop while drunk that they wouldn't do while sober. This is where your view seems very weird and completely divorced from reality to me. I have been drunk and hit on girls many,many times. Dozens. Maybe even hundreds. There was never …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 06:08 PM
2

Oh yeah and you think today's college campuses are "wild and uncontrolled"? I literally laughed out loud at that silly notion. You never saw any college campuses in the late 80s and early 90s then. They make even todays biggest party universities look like Sunday school.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 05:55 PM
1

So why is drunk driving illegal? If you would do the same things drunk or not drunk, surely driving while drunk wouldn't matter. You've got to be kidding me. Are you just trolling or are you actually serious? Obviously because alcohol inhibits your ability to drive safely. That is an awful analogy. The point is alcohol is not instilling any new desire or action. No one is suddenly being instilled with a desire to rape just because they are drunk. Do you actually believe that being drunk instills…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 05:46 PM
1

That was cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 05:42 PM
1

Pseudo science garbage. In every man subconscious there is a desire to rape? GTFO with this ignorant belief with zero foundation in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 05:30 PM
1

so it changes what an individual would normally do in their day to day lives. This phrasing is off. It doesn't change. I've been drunk, coked up, whatever. Being intoxicated doesn't change what you would do. No one that wouldn't rape someone sober turns into a rapist when drunk. People who raped when drunk still have the desire to rape when sober. Someone like myself who never has an impulse to rape, you can get me drunk, coked up a million times and Ill never rape anyone. Its a psychological/ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 05:28 PM
0

Being surrounded by people who normalize certain stereotypes and create a macho sex culture make it easier to make choices that violate another's consent. This has literally nothing to do with partying and everything to do with how maladjusted and demented the minority of population that are rapists are.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 05:17 PM
1

That sounds like the stupid excuse that Stanfurd rapist used. Bullshit excuse to evade taking responsibiloty for their own actions. Man up and take responsibily. Drinking is never am excuse for fucking rape ffs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 05:14 PM
1

I prefer more accurate , up to date models. Myers-Briggs while hardly perfect is much better way to analyze personality. Also for me i find non-agenda based models such as Art of Seduction exponentially more effective than the juvenile stuff i see on TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 05:09 PM
4

The problem is that things like 80/20 have never been proven to begin with. You lads just assert rubbish and then act like its on everyone else to disprove your half baked pop psych baloney. Sorry it doesnt work that way. TRP seems to love unsubstantiated claims and then says oh you didnt disprove my unsubstantiated claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 05:02 PM
3

I have no idea where they get this 80-20 rubbish (even though many act more like they believe its only 5% of men getting all the women) but you are right. Real world from my decades of dating experience pre-internet and post-dating app is that RP doesnt really describe the majority of the real world. It only describes a select minority sub set. Also ignorant is how they pretend all women are 'hypergamy' when reality is about the same number of men are hypergamous as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 04:57 PM
1

Not all personal experience but what ive witnessed from friends , family, co workers, etc. And no it wouldnt correlate to sterotype RP concepts like alpha or beta either as some of the men fit the RP notion of alpha (lifted, good job, etc). Maybe they had small dicks or were awful at sex though. RP tends to ignore those two relevant factors. Anyway id never bet on some sheltered low N woman staying faithful.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 04:51 PM
1

So outdated pop psychology. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 04:49 PM
1

How much of this is due to the explosion of dating apps in recent years? None? The behavior you describe is no different than before dating apps. A 1000 rejections in the real world would cripple a man. A 1000 rejections in the virtual world mean nothing. Where are you getting this stuff ? Just making it up? Totally wrong. In my life ive been rejected many times (ok maybe not literally 1000s but still) and you are wrong. Real life rejections do not "cripple a man".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 04:48 PM
1

sure
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/16 03:33 PM
1

So a self-selected self-reporting survey? From a website run by a fully right-wing group with an agenda? Hah. I just seen a red pill claim "all women are liars" so self-reporting studies are worthless and that one was by the CDC which looks more academically viable than that website. Its also conducted by a professor from Univ. of Utah so I am also wary of a completely biased agenda at worst or even just some very strong confirmation bias in the least. That's certainly not compelling enough to o…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/16 03:32 PM
1

Meth head can make her cum. Dentist cant. Simple. Its not a RP/BP thing because if the dentist had big dick / knew how to make her cum she wouldnt cheat. What RP forgets (focusing far too much on aesthetics) and BP forgets (focusing far too much on personality and feels) is that sexual performance matters! Maybe thats winning genetic lottery and having above average dick or maybe its learning how to make girls cum. Either way, ones ability to perform well sexually is FAR more important in LTR th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 10:35 PM
1

To me? Absolutely nothing. I dont find the terminology useful or beneficial for debate amd discussion at all. I also believe trying to lump everything regarding a complex topic into two categories is a false dichotomy. But if the terms are used there needs to be a precise operational definition that i see missing in discussions here. Ask 5 RP and 5 BP to define those terms and youll get 12 different answers for what they mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 10:25 PM
1

Can you link evidence? From my experiences the lowest N count women were by far the worst at marriage and the worst at not staying faithful. Way too much grass is always greener syndrome with say the 22 year old women w/ N count of 1-3.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 09:45 PM
1

If it does id guess the lowest N counts are most likely to fail in marriage and cheat, at least that was my experience. I think TRP has it backwards actually with regards to N count.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 09:42 PM
1

Neither.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 09:36 PM
1

Creeps like dan ciley should be called out at every opportunity for being creeps because they are. 99.9% of the men i have seen called creepy have been called creepy because they were acting creepy as fuck. Its a TRP BS myth that average dudes hitting on girls in normal manner get called creeps.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 07:33 PM
1

If you dont know the differencd between old 1930s 1940s GQ mens grooming and men's fashion and the type that Cristiano Ronaldo then i suggest doing some research. There is huge difference between trad fashion, grooming and taking of yourself and the sttle, method and fashion of effeminate metrosexual like Cristiano. If you tell me your skin tone, hair color and eye color ill tell you what color shirt-tie-jacket combinations complement your features the best. Its very different thing cristiano do…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 07:27 PM
1

So just your anecdotal. Cool story. Everyone has cool stories and anecdotes. As anonymous random redditor yours , with no supporting evidence, can be ignored
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 07:23 PM
1

Im not confusing anything. TRP doesnt provide very good operational definitions is the point
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 07:21 PM
2

a lot of metrosexuals are definitely more feminine men. Even if you take the ones that have some strong masculine traits. Cristiano Ronaldo is generally considered more effeminate than Lionel Messi for instance due to his preening, extreme focus on his appearance, fashion taste and such.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 07:31 PM
1

Yeah. Especially after the Civil War, its easy to see how the words evolved. Laissez-faire classic liberal economics was the traditional mode in the USA so that became what is "conservative" since conservative at its most basic definition is conserving the status quo. The conservatives of Europe were the monarchists. But in America the conservatives preserving the status quo were the most laissez-faire classic liberals of the late 1800s (post CW to current). Which lead to the progressive backlas…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 07:26 PM
2

Ok anecdotal evidence...by anonymous person over the internet. Why should anyone believe your claims more than anything else? And while a self-reported CDC survey obviously has inherent self-reporting flaws, its still a bit more concrete than the anecdote of one anonymous redditor yea?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 07:15 PM
2

I get that is your opinion. What are you basing your estimates on again? What you have personally witnessed?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 07:13 PM
2

Most girls lose their virginity when they are around 13 or 14, and by the time they are 25 they've had more than 10 sexual casual partners. I'm talking about attractive women btw. i don't know at what age fat asses lose their virginity. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 06:48 PM
2

How can you object to an anonymous CDC survey but then use whatever subjective criteria is in your head (whatever you personally observed or were told) to make assertions about "most women"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 06:47 PM
9

I think date rape, campus rape, etc are valid topics. But using jargon phrases like "rape culture" devalues the actual issues and leads away from mutually beneficial discussions. One thing I see in common with both the trp/MRA crowd and the feminist/SJW crowds are that both love to use jargon, acronyms and these memes in a way that does not foster good discussion. To me "rape culture" fits into the category of "AWALT". All these MRA/SJW acronyms and jargon phrases are roughly equivalent to what …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 06:35 PM
1

An argument could be made for either really.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 06:11 PM
3

Strawman. You were the one that brought up the argument that its something "every man has done". So I countered your blanket assertion by pointing out that the behavior in your first post as you initially described it is not in fact something "every man has done". The way you described it- pushing past a no in "no uncertain terms" - is something that not many men ever do.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 06:04 PM
8

We were both in college, 20 years old. She told me to go away. I tried to put my arm around her. She shouted "no don't do that stop doing that." I stopped. Now you are changing the context of the story. A girl at a party telling you to go away is not really the same as implying you got a "no in no uncertain terms". Context changed a little between your phrasings. You do sound a little less creepy in this version and more just completely clueless on reading social clues. Of course you could just …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 05:57 PM
12

Yeah its baffling to me how these dudes act like its so impossible to tell if a girl is into you that you have to keep physically hitting on her even after a no in "no uncertain terms"in order for them to finally realize she isn't interested. I'm actually starting to wonder if I am being gaslighted by a reddit troll rather than someone being serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 05:46 PM
6

You are resorting to loaded buzzwords and nonsense jargon instead of just manning up and accepting that what you did was morally unacceptable. It was also ridiculous how tried to excuse it as something that happens to every man which shows just how far removed you are from reality. When a woman says no in "no uncertain terms" exactly how you described it, then its on you to stop right then and there. Period. By not doing so you are crossing a morally unacceptable line. Not sure why its so hard f…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 05:43 PM
15

Not sure what you are even talking about with "shaming". And no I am not wrong. You were morally wrong and acted creepy, dangerous andborderline illegal. You did something wrong. No in "no uncertain terms" means YOU should have stopped. You didn't. You did something morally wrong. If you don't understand the difference between hitting on a girl in a normal, healthy fashion and your actions of crossing boundaries then its you who shouldn't be out in public and definitely not out drinking because …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 05:09 PM
12

Nothing emotional. I am simply logically pointing out what you did was morally wrong. Its funny how you can't just admit what you did was wrong and learn from it. When a woman tells you no in "no uncertain terms", it is on you to stop pushing and stop trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 05:03 PM
16

No in "no uncertain terms" is not a boundary that you should be testing. Testing that boundary like you did to force into shouting in your face is crossing a line you shouldn't have crossed and you were in the wrong. Again, you didn't say "she coyly said no sex tonight". You said she told you no in "no uncertain terms" and you proceeded to keep going. Now maybe that phrase means something subjective and different to you but by definition "no uncertain terms" means a boundary you should know not …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 05:00 PM
8

I know its not the example he brought up. Its the example i brought up. What the guy in biggerd post did was nothing wrong. What pembayliss admitted to doing IS wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 04:49 PM
9

Nice rant but its a red herring. The point is your actions are not okay. When a girl tells you no in "no uncertain terms" then its on you to stop. Your behaved inappropriately and crossed a line you shouldnt have crossed. No girl should have to shout in your face for you to get the message to stop getting physical. No in no uncertain terms and you should have stopped. Thats not on society or the dangerous world or different sorts of people. Its on you. I hope you learned your lesson and do not c…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 04:47 PM
17

If she doesn't want that, then maybe she shouldn't be out in public. Maybe she shouldn't be out drinking. Awful logic. Maybe you and guys like you that can't read social cues shouldn't be out in public. Maybe you and guys that haven't learned how to stop after a no in "no uncertain terms" shouldn't be out drinking. That's life. The world is full of all kinds of different people, some of whom are better at it than others. And some are creepy and cross boundaries so they need to be told in "no unc…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 04:33 PM
12

The problem isn't women being able to say no. The problem is guys like you who don't stop when a women tells you no in "no uncertain terms": I remember once at a party being with a girl who told me "no" in no uncertain terms and when I kept going, shouted at me "NO DON'T DO THAT STOP DOING THAT RIGHT NOW". https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/5045eq/rape_culture_and_the_anatomy_of_a_regret_rape_case/d717xvd
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 04:22 PM
6

RPers have a problem with feminine men because women have a problem with feminine men by not dating and sleeping with them. Really? Metrosexuals never get laid or lusted after? Clearly you don't live in California if you actually believe what you just wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 04:18 PM
3

You are the one getting emotional because I called you out on actions that are very creepy and troublesome.What you did is not okay. Insisting that you can keep trying after a girl tells you no in no uncertain terms is creepy, dangerous and a little bit rapey. Being drunk is no excuse. GTFO with that one. I have probably been drunk thousands of times and never crossed those boundaries. If you lack that much self control then you shouldn't be in social situations drinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 04:16 PM
3

Heh. So if I'm to listen to you, I have to never ever talk to her again, break my apartment lease, and move to the next town over. Slippery slope fallacy. Thats not what I said and you misrepresenting what I said doesn't help your argument. You specificaly said a girl told you no in "no uncertain terms". By definition "No uncertain terms" does not leave any room for uncertainty. You didn't say she "coyly said we are not having sex tonight". She rejected you in no uncertain terms - your own words…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 04:07 PM
3

If she tells you no in "no uncertain terms" then no, its not on her at that point its on you. What you just attempted to, is actually FAR closer to actual and legal rape than the example in the OP. The OP post is an example of people jump too quick to call rape. But you trying to assert that its still on her after she already told you no in "no uncertain terms really is indicative of some issues on your part. While /u/biggerdthanyou is too far down the "everything is rape" in the OP, you seem to…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:57 PM
0

Its your conclusion that is the main problem At first glance, 56% of comments including something that could be construed as angry/hateful does seem high. But when the most common angry/hateful trait is profanity, just 13% of comments were solely angry/hateful, and the average comment score is below 1 it looks more like the TRP claim that "this is just locker room language" has some merit. This is you trying to hand wave everything away with "just 13% were solely angry blah blah ...." which is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:48 PM
2

I remember once at a party being with a girl who told me "no" in no uncertain terms and when I kept going shouted at me "NO DON'T DO THAT STOP DOING THAT RIGHT NOW" Why did you keep going if she told you no in "no uncertain terms"? Tbh your example sounds clearly much worse than the OP
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:42 PM
4

Getting on top of a sleeping woman and starting to make out with her is very abnormal. By even her own words that is NOT what happened. Exagerrating and changing the facts doesnt help your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:26 PM
2

Thats not accurate. She never says she was asleep. She says she was "trying to sleep" which begs a lot of questions. Why didnt she ask / tell him to move or go elsewhere if she was allegedly "trying to sleep" ? Why didnt she just get up and move? Just based on face value her story doesnt add up and it would be wrong to leap to the conclusion of rape in this case based on this incomplete story
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:24 PM
1

Its not clear cut because there isnt really enough information. At this level of information i am inclined to say Not Rape at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:19 PM
1

And if the radical fem does that, they are wrong. Just like the TRP opinion on misandry is wrong. Both sides are making things up to further an agenda and neither is based in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:16 PM
1

Well you are right its very weak, thats for sure and it doesnt really do even what you claim because you havent "quantified how angry TRP is as typically stated here" which would be the actual necessary first step. This is just meaningless psuedo science that proves and means nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:15 PM
0

Trting to weed out any "profanity" as just "locker room talk" and not acknowledging the connotations of TRP buzzword use like "cock carousel" makes your post arbitrary and meaningless noise. You seem to be trting really hard to "prove" TRP is not angry but your effort is very uncompelling.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:13 PM
8

Alpha and beta are not really precisely defined terms to make this a useful question. To many TRP posters any "beta" that has women getting wet wanting to have sex is actually an "alpha". They are almost tautologically defining alpha as those that are getting sex so its pointless. You would need precise operational definitions to even try. Altthough for the record ive seen plenty examples over the years of girls wanting to fuck guys outside what most TRP would consider alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:08 PM
13

misandry That word doesnt mean what you seem to think it does. For example this: She is openly bragging about how she likes to cheat men out of free meals by pretending to date them Might be shitty but its not misandry. It would be like a feminist claiming that lying to women about your career to get laid is misogyny. No. Its just lying. No misandry or misogyny in either of those.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/16 04:26 PM
2

At first glance, 56% of comments including something that could be construed as angry/hateful does seem high. But when the most common angry/hateful trait is profanity, just 13% of comments were solely angry/hateful, and the average comment score is below 1 it looks more like the TRP claim that "this is just locker room language" has some merit. This is an entirely subjective analysis where you casually dismiss a whole lot of comments arbitrarily especially when in another post you listed very c…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/16 04:08 PM
1

In the real world people arent really ostracized based on ugliness or lack of sexual success. What ostracizes people are when they act like total creeps like that Dan ciley asshole. That dudes looks are not the problem. His problem is he has internalized this completely warped incel/TRP philosophy that leads him to have more negative game than even ugly people would have.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/16 03:59 PM
3

Without an actual objective , representative way to analyze which "top comments" you selected and which you subjectively didnt select this whole "analysis" is just meaningless white noise. Seriously you TRP peoole need to tone down the psuedo science obsesssion. Its like phrenology in here
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/16 03:50 PM
0

Exactly that douchebag is tall and classically attractive to many women purely on looks but he is such a creepy stalker he is going to turn off everyone. TRP needs to go look at that guy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/16 03:45 PM
1

Thanks for the link. However its not very compelling to me. Most of these are very poor examples of Hilary being attacked "for being a woman" IMO 1) She is getting attacked because she is the unpopular Democrat nominee for President. Obama, Kerry, Gore, and her hubby all faced similar levels of vitriol from the right wingnuts. Trump is being name called, insulted and attacked just as hard from the left wingnuts. Its the partisan political climate much more than it is "because she is a woman". Co…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 06:07 PM
2

Decline of western society ? Wtf are you talking about? There is no decline in the west, China demographics are going to be a massive problem and its the middle east whose resource intensive economies are falsely propping them up that are already beginning to decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 04:23 PM
1

Do we obsess over a man's haircut and clothing and imply that any failure to dress perfectly and stylishly means he shouldn't have the job like we do with women? We absolutely judge male politician on looks as much as women its just not as obvious. Just look at the famous JFK-Nixon debate where everyone watching on TV thought JFK won but everyone listening on radio thought Nixon won. Since then, appearancr has absolutely mattered just as much for male politicians as women. There have been studie…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 04:18 PM
1

The reason id say Suits is at least tradcon if not red pill is mostly because of Louis and Mike who have some 'high earning beta' traits but act like stereotypical alpha males alot. Look how Loius treats all his secretaries even Donna who is clearly the hot, competent, wise alpha female. Even Loius completely bosses Donna around. Even the strong women like Donna and Bunk's daughter are submissive to the main men even if those men exhibit some beta qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 10:55 PM
2

Neither of your options gives enough information for me to decide in anything remotely like a realistic way. For instance does your option B wife evolve her sexual tastes and interests as you do over the course of decades? For instance you get into BDSM, she does too? Are you also assuming her other traits, hobbies and quirks also evolve in complementary and not any conflicting fashion to your own? For instance if you want to go on a vacation to Europe with friends and no wives she is 100% cool …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 05:05 PM
1

Just curious, was Isaac Newton an alpha, beta or omega in your eyes?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 04:58 PM
1

Is Suits a "red pill" TV show?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 04:53 PM
2

How are you defining RP relationships and distinguishing them from simple tradcon relationships? I'm not sure what trp people think differentiates a redpill wife from just a tradcon wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 04:52 PM
1

Got it. So brutally honest to you is phrasing something in an intentionally hurtful way. I think some people use "brutally honest" as more of flashy way of just saying they are blunt and don't sugar coat things ya know?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 04:44 PM
1

Can you give me an example of honesty that you expect compared to "brutal honesty" which you don't want? Are you meaning on a level like you want your SO to say " Honey, maybe you change that outfit before we go out and donate that one to Goodwill" as opposed to "That outfit makes you look fat and ugly babe!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 07:34 PM
1

Into sex and bdsm Take responsibility Depends on the girl More genuine
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 07:04 AM
1

I highly doubt you want someone to be brutally truthful with you. Do you want someone to be brutally truthful with you?^
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:58 AM
1

Is the....unwilling to settle down? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:50 AM
2

What character traits do men like in women for a relationship? Women who are into sex. Do men prefer women who are irresponsible or who take responsibility for themselves at least? Very different for different people. Does intelligence play any role? For some yes, for others no. Do men prefer women who are more manipulative or more genuine? Obviously more genuine - but sometimes manipulative works better.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:43 AM
1

Yeah and most don't act like Ryan Locte unless they are 16 year old morons or total noobs trying to fake the funk.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:39 AM
3

Dumbshit is the word I was thinking
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:38 AM
0

odd distinction. So if I'm day drinking at bars/clubs/boat parties that is day game or night game? If I'm at the park or bus stop at night is that 'day or night game'? You young cats sure make a lot of weird useless distinctions for some reason...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:31 AM
1

You expressed disbelief that C could actually cause a loss of sexual attraction. I am giving you a concrete example of what I lived that is C literally causing a loss of sexual attraction. I could even give you a few more generalized cases taken from examples of people I know where again C is literally causing loss of sexual attraction (not sex drive but literal loss of attraction) in ways that render B completely irrelevant as an explanation. As I said the type of girl I would've rated a 9-10 w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 03:38 PM
1

I don't see what's scary at all. It was a bit more complicated than "just developing a fetish". I would call it more people changing. It happens. The fetish was probably more a manifestation of my being a type of person that changes over the years in some ways than she was. What I disagree with is the red pill narrative that LTR/marriages only fail if one or the other "lets themself go". Either the man becomes fat and beta and women loses interest or the women gets fat and man loses interest. Pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 03:30 PM
2

Dating sites have very different distributions from the general population. Also one dating site is not going to be representative of another as they have different focuses. Define what you mean by "day game"?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 03:06 PM
5

Naw, that's just mirror neurons. Although tbf, some neuroscientists will argue that empathy pretty much is mirror neurons firing so I guess its dependent on how you define empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/16 11:40 PM
7

Is there a study that shows any of these dating sites is actually representative of the actual population?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/16 11:38 PM
1

I already posted what happened in my marriage. From 20 to 30 I got into BDSM and she didn't. We both lost attraction due to that. Our sexual preferences literally changed a lot over 9 years. Life literally happened without any reference to some weird concept like "beta-ing out". How in the world does B apply to what I experienced?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/16 11:27 PM
1

What's your basis for saying this? My life experience. I already gave a personal example in the post you replied to, so I am not sure why you even ask this. Sexual preferences can change over time. I (and practically all my oldest friends) had very different sexual preferences at 30 than we did at 20. Both male and female.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/16 11:19 PM
1

I already gave an example of ex-wife and I BOTH losing attraction due to "life happening". We grew in different directions and our attractions both slowly changed. My ideal 10 women when I was 30 looked very different than what my ideal 10 at 20 YO was. Without kids, we likely would have split years sooner and avoided this case study but since we stayed together a bit longer than non-parents would have, I got to witness it first hand. Its literally life happening. I've also witnessed a few simil…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/16 11:13 PM
6

C is by far the most common in my experience. A AND B dont even come close Also dont even try to say its really B. I Married early 20s. In late 20s i got into bdsm, she didnt. We both lost attraction because we had changed in different directions. Life happens. People change. I was in better shape and making more money so "excuse for B" is rubbish.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 10:04 PM
5

They cant because thats going way past the realm of sexual strategy and entering into ignorant, unrealistic dogma in order to validate some odd personal belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 09:59 PM
6

It's not just sexual values; it's bonding ability. High N doesn't damage men in terms of bonding ability in the same way it does to women. Evidence? Source? This is the type of naive psuedo science that should have no place.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 09:56 PM
3

Id say its about 1/3 The other thirds being systemizers who agree with the end goal but have different systems. The other third being people who just dont agree with the end goal and dgaf about systemizing things or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 09:43 PM
-1

This makes sense subconsciously
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 05:32 AM
-1

5'9 - 5'10 is the trickiest height for women if you think about it. Under 5'8 women realize that any man shorter than them is below average height which has psychological effect. Women, especially runway models, 5'11+ realize the majority of men are shorter than them so they don't care as much naturally. But women 5'9-5'10 are right at the average height of men which is a trickier situation. I have seen various women that height develop very different predispositions towards height in men. Relev…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 05:29 AM
2

On the other hand, with pretty tall women like myself I've noticed that we tend to often be more forgiving if someone's a little shorter because tall girls sometimes get that whole "you're intimidating and your height makes you look not feminine" type bs so they might also care less. This is my experience. The taller the girl , the less she cares about her partner being taller. Runway models I've known IRL almost always date guys shorter than them. Hot shortgirls(5'2-5'5) I almost never see with…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 03:04 AM
2

We had it in the 80s too it was just called "techno" or "acid house" to the ITK
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 02:46 AM
1

belgian EDM,hard techno and german industrial before most of you were born LA Style were not Belgians, they were Dutch ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 02:42 AM
2

Old school rap is awesome (Grandmaster Flash, Kool Herc, Kurtis Blow, Rakim) New school rap is trash old school EDM is awesome (Cybotron, 808 State) new school EDM DJs are trash
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 02:39 AM
3

The majority of guys don't have male model looks, so they can't get away with saying/doing the shit Chads say. Male models couldn't get away with saying that stuff to any of the hot girls I know on eHarmony or Match. On Tinder? Sure, its fecking Tinder! Doesn't matter what their archetype is, they are all looking for casual hook ups which makes it distinctly different than eHarmony or the more niche LTR dating sites. Everyone knows (or should know) the spectrum of dating sites: (casual no string…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 02:11 AM
10

There is nothing in the article that "proves 80/20". Also Tinder is not even remotely representative of society or even dating as a whole. You seem to be falling victim to confirmation bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/16 08:15 PM
1

Paris was famous years beforr Kim K copied her so its no surprise if she decided to disappear earlier. Only reason Kim K is still talked about last few years is because her ultra famous Olympian step dad just became the worlds most famous trans woman during the peak of LGBT awareness in media. She really doesnt count for anything Anyone with her massive advantages of starting out with fame , wealth and powerful connections can succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/16 02:49 PM
3

His talent, charisma and the way he carried himself contributed to it. So, hard to say. If the coffee shop hipster looked exactly like Prince but didn't have those other things, I'd probably still think he was good-looking (because I do think Prince was facially attractive), but he wouldn't have the same sex appeal. Gotcha. Going back to the late 1980s I never understood the appeal Prince had for some girls I knew (one of whom was obsessed with him back in the day). But this makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 06:35 PM
1

I'm not sure where you are going with this. Do you know the typical All-American blonde vanilla cheerleader archetype or no? I do know that archetype and am not attracted to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 06:33 PM
1

prince would never be 'just some hipster', even as a non-famous non-musician sitting in a coffee shop. What makes you say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 06:31 PM
1

That's Kim K's persona. Like, say what you will about her, but she has a multimillion-dollar career based on being in a sex tape once with someone who is now significantly less famous than her. That's not the kind of thing that happens if you're actually a moron. The lady is brilliant at PR. No way. You have massively overrated her. She started off with advantages that most people never even come close to having. Not only did she grow up rich, but her family was heavily connected in Hollywood an…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 06:22 PM
3

Would you say that if he wasn't a famous musician but just some hipster in the coffee shop that looked like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 06:12 PM
1

There is no typical American taste, truth be told. I mean the archetype of the blonde haired vanilla "All-American" cheerleader type. That archetype has permeated media for decades so I am sure you know the typical look.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 06:08 PM
3

If one partner definitely wants kids and the other definitely does not, its a recipe for a doomed relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 06:04 PM
1

but I know the carpet and the curtains are clashing. I would be surprised if she had any carpet tbh. But yeah see I think GoT has the hottest collection of actresses on TV but I know my taste differs than typical Americans.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 06:02 PM
7

Angelina Jolie and Cameron Diaz but I don't know if anyone remembers them or thinks they're hot anymore. Are people here that young?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 05:59 PM
3

GoT actresses are almost never any good Hmm I disagree. Missandei, Sansa, Ygritte, Daenerys, Melisandre?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 05:58 PM
3

Natalie Dormer has a weird face. Most people I know think Natalie Dormer has a "weird" face. I think she is gorgeous though, much more sexually attractive to me than a more conventionally hot girl like Jennifer Lawrence who doesn't do anything for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 05:55 PM
4

Jennifer Lawrence, Kim Kardashian, Rihanna
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 05:50 PM
1

You can argue a lot of dual parent households are also doing their children a disservice. I dont rate single mom as more of a disservice than conservative religious parents, hardcore fans of Trump or hardcore fans of Hilary for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 04:20 PM
7

I think it comes from internet poseurs that are trying too hard to be edgy. They're taking the old PUA advice from the 1980s of "single moms usually want relationships therefore they should be avoided for casual sex" and taking it to some extreme hate to come off as edgy and controversial.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 10:49 PM
1

Keep changing the goalposts. Ive seen so many real life examples of dudes that dont "lift" have average builds, know how to fuck and have mad social skills they get way more action than dumb meatheads that have six packs and muscles but are morons with no game. Now if we keep social skills equal between your Jersey Shore meathead with big muscles and small dick and skinnyfat hipster with big dick who can last for hours your meathead is probably going to lose more to the hip big dick than your po…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 10:24 PM
1

How's the average looking doofus with the 9 inch cock going to get chicks to have sex with him if he's a chubster doofus? You really don't know how group dynamics work? And chicks would rather have shitty sex with a good looking musclebound asshole with a small or average cock than have awesome sex with a chubby vagina technician with the magic tongue and the big dick. Ok. Link me your evidence of this. You want to make a poll? Let's ask some actually women. Of course its a sliding scale. But my…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 09:27 PM
1

The most intimate moments I have ever had are holding my partner and assuring him everything is going to be ok ill take care of it. Do you tend to be attracted to men with problems that you can then help them solve ?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 09:15 PM
2

If you are stoic, you'll hide your anger, and people might not realize that. Thats not being stoic. I think you and /u/AnUndecidedPill misunderstand stoicism. Being stoic isnt hiding anger. Being stoic is not having that anger to begin with. Seriously go read some Marcus Aurelius!!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 08:56 PM
1

I hope if my fiancé cheats that he never confesses and I never find out. So you believe in the Matrix's literal blue pill? You are Cypher. You would rather live in ignorant bliss than know the truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 06:16 PM
3

One thing I never see TRP talk about is how hung you are as a man. A man can lift all day and look like the perfect jawline Adonis but if he's only 4 inches he probably has less sexual prospects than the average looking doofus rocking the 9 incher. Yes, this one is all genetics and biology but TRP ignores it while in my experience, more hot girls are going to want to bang the 9 inch chubby guy than the super athletic 4 incher. Or we could go further and incorporate some BP ideas - a man needs to…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 06:00 PM
1

but he'll probably gradually end up in a deadbedroom situation...the dude is just not Alpha enough. Does TRP acknowledge that its possible for a Beta to not be in a "deadbedroom"? Do they acknowledge that 1) Some betas and betawives are perfectly happy with vanilla sex? and 2) there does exist submissive men who might be rich but are actually into being dominated by strong women sexually. They are beta but why is their fetish a "deadbedroom" just because their fantasy isn't TRP idealism?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 05:56 PM
1

Hopefully not what the skewed middle eastern population of extra young men did.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 04:41 PM
1

You never worked as a bartender have you
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 03:10 AM
1

Nothing i said has to do with fantasy mentality or red pill. Its basic math man
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 03:10 AM
1

I agree with that completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 04:14 PM
5

Hadn't you noticed women are much more assertive these days? Not in my experience. Women were just as assertive 20 years ago before the age of texting and social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 04:13 PM
1

Feminism has ingrained that men and women are equal in most if not every way. I really wonder sometimes what people who say things like this do and where they live because even self described feminists i know dont believe that. Its more about equality of opportunity rather than baseline equal in every way. If everyone you know actually believes that, let me know what city you live in so i can avoid it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 02:53 PM
2

Yes it probably hurts some guys more than it helps. if a guy just wants to get laid or have a relationshop just focus on strategy and knowing yourself. u dont need all the stupid acronyms and psuedo science garbage to "not be blue pill". Just read Art of Seduction, develop sexual strategy and dont waste time on all the unnecessary trolling and vitriol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 02:44 PM
3

Spot on. No one is a 6. Trying to reduce attraction to some mean of arbitrary ratings is pop psychology and inevitably leads to poor strategic thinking .
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 02:34 PM
1

Good post. From finding the weird little nich corner of the internet that is TRP i have believed that these people have fallen victim to many common cognitive bias and statistical errors in human thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 02:29 PM
2

Better job prospects in what way? Do you really not get it or are you just trolling ?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 02:20 PM
1

Wrong. But keep on believing this defeatist BS if it works for you
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 02:19 PM
1

Personal insults based on nonsensical millenial slang. Well done
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 02:17 PM
6

She's a bartender because she likes the attention of drunken men to begin with. Or they just like more money with better job prospects than being a waitress. Its clear youve never worked in bars for you to make such a foolish statement
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 08:55 PM
3

You have to make a strategic decision depending on comtext. If there are other potential prospects in the same public space approaching the busy one and visibly getting rejected might ruin your chances with the other prospects. You usually dont want to appear like you are hitting on any and every girl
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 08:26 PM
1

Its absolutely a great tactic for anyone. The worst that happens is she tells you no and you lost nothing more than 30 seconds. I have seen dozens of cases of this working great
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 08:20 PM
3

Its relevant to this thread, no need to make one just to ask a question. So for a 21 year old girl who was introduced to you as a "porn star" what N count is too high for you? Or are you going with a standard like Potter Stewarts "ill know it when i see it"? Or how about this , is a 22 YO porn star with N count of 3 better or worse marriage material to you than a non porn star with N count of 9 ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 08:15 PM
1

Ive heard a girl who had only done a couple girl-girl scenes call herself a porn star and heard multiple people call cam girls "porn stars". Also you never said what you consider a "high N count". 5, 10, 15 ? ke the knots some of you will tie yourselves in to assume a hypothetical porn actress is the shining exception. No idea what you are talking about with this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 07:47 PM
3

I doubt the percent of people that are true incel is over 2% of the population. Most people that think they are , are not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 04:52 PM
-1

At the very least, a porn star has a high N count You are relying on assumptions not in the original premise although i guess it depends on what is "high" for you. For the OP its possible she only made 1 or 2 porn movies but i get the impression that anything over 0 is a "high N count" for some of you extreme RP posters.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 04:51 PM
2

Sure. Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 04:47 PM
1

I've never been poor but I've had poor friends growing up. I grew up in the middle class with working parents. Also this is rural white poverty I don't know if that makes a difference. Literally every person Im thinking of is white It does make a difference because my experience is in big city poverty and big cities. I have no idea what these people do to get disability but they seem pretty normal to me, but hey I'm not a doctor Okay. Think about this statement. You don't even know why they are …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 09:16 PM
6

On a subreddit dedicated to sexual strategy where almost everyone using 1-10 is doing so in context of physical attractiveness, I'd think using HB was redundant. But maybe I'm just drunk.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 08:46 PM
1

In general it seems like you're exaggerating a lot or overestimating the cost of everything No, I've lived poor. Have you? By your posts you seem to have a drastic misconception of what poor neighborhoods in America have been like the last 30 years. Talking about kids in poor neighborhoods "somehow" getting their living expenses taken care of really shows a disconnect from reality. Or you are just confusing less well to do middle class with actual poor people? I know people on disability who are…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 08:41 PM
2

so whats the difference between a "hot babe" 10 and a regular 10?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 08:32 PM
1

If you can get $700 a month and somehow get your housing expenses taken care of (live with mom, etc) the world is your oyster This is a middle/upper class thing. All due respect but I don't think you truly understand the situation with poor people here. In the real poor neighborhoods there is no 18 year old kid living in mom's basement playing video games with no income. That doesn't happen in poor families. That happens in the suburbs. In real poor families, you start working as young as possib…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 08:26 PM
7

Good post. I think the reddit TRP is overly focused on the top 2% ('Chad' and The Supermodel Virgin) and bottom 2% (incels and super obese whales) and really forgets the middle 96%
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 07:59 PM
3

What is HB?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 07:57 PM
1

I don't have to imagine because growing up i lived for two years in a poor city with one of the highest crime rates in the country. It's why I'm calling BS on your claim because it goes against my direct experience and all the data I've seen. First this is the USA. We barely even have a functional safety net for the people that actually need it. This isnt Scandinavia where you can goto college for free for 10 years. What's even available to some 18-25 YO that wants to be unproductive? Food stamp…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 07:34 PM
1

Overly simplistic view of the world. Incentives in the real world aren't so simple. Either way it hardly proves your original silly claim which is completely unsupported unless you want to link me something proving the US has all these welfare party kids
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:41 PM
4

I believe both your hypotheticals are so far removed from modern western society you are basically arguing a red herring with this angle.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:30 PM
1

You actually believe this? The social safety net (which barely even exists in America anymore) is incentiviizing people to just become party kids looking to get laid and not be productive members of society?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:29 PM
4

Even if Hilary wins the USA is far too partisan polarized for her to win in even close to a landslide. Plus most people hate hillary. Only the Democrat establishment likes her. Neither dem or rep candidate is getting more than 55% of the popular vote. I'd be surprised if the winner even got 52% of the popular vote. Personally I might place a bet on the eventual winner getting under 49%
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:15 PM
6

I'd love to see your evidence supporting this. Especially in modern American as if the social safety net just pays people to party lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:08 PM
4

Less short sighted that supporting Hilary (or Jeb Bush )
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:05 PM
3

Everyone involved on both sides of gamergate are attention seeking fecking nutcases. Society would be better ejecting both the radical feminists and radical MRA/4Channers
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/16 05:07 PM
1

conspiracy theory logic, well done!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/16 05:04 PM
1

Why wouldn't you want to bang someone that's hot? Drama lol Cause they're actually able to have intellectual conversations and have intellectual hobbies and interests. I know women who fulfill that criteria as well though. Maybe I'm old but I have a few co-ed groups of friends
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 10:20 PM
5

It works. I know a divorced guy that kept wearing his ring for years after because he said girls dug it. He incorporated it into his game. He wasn't looking for a ltr so it was a great 'accessory'. He had one girl thinking she was "having an affair" for months it was great because he just used wife as an excuse to never spend more time with her I told him not to tell her because she was into the whole other woman thing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 09:37 PM
1

I know I don't know why I kept checking here, the political subs got boring for me maybe. I've intended to write a post on pure sexual strategy for months but never got around to it haha
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 09:34 PM
1

For information. In a lot of different contexts. Information is power. By maintaining a casual friendship with some women you gain valuable pieces of information that open up opportunities that might not be open to you. Also sometimes drinking with a female when single makes hitting on other random girls for ONS much easier than if your wingman was a man. Also just the fun aspect. Sometimes hanging out with a hot you don't want to bang is still fun. I mean why does a man hang out with another ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 09:30 PM
1

This is why I try to mostly stay away from sjw vs mra debates because both sides sound like clueless nutcases to me
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 09:23 PM
1

Let me phrase more specifically, Due to diet, skin genetics and personal health habits, white Americans and English age worse than other cultural group of equal socio-economic status
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 09:22 PM
1

Define "many" Yes I do know cases like that personally
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 09:20 PM
1

Naw, that's the standard for teenagers with no experience in the real world
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 09:18 PM
1

YOUR SINGULAR EXPERIENCE IN EUROPE IS NOT THE EXPERIENCE OF MEN AND WOMEN IN THE U.S. Likewise your singular experience in whatever weird town you live is not representative of the rest of us men and women living in the USA
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 09:17 PM
2

If he read it wrong and he makes a sexual move where you're not attracted to him, you'll call the cops. What total bullshit. I've probably tried to kiss dozens if not hundreds of girls and been rejected and never had anything remotely like calling the cops. I worked in bars/clubs for years and never once witnesses anything like the cops being called because some ugly dude tried to kiss a girl once. That's such nonsense.very rarely we had to kick a douchebag out once who was repeatedly harassing …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 09:11 PM
1

SJWs fall into two camps: either do not approve of any interracial relationships or don't care. The ones who do care are against all of them because of "cultural appropriation." How can someone for "social justice" not approve of any interracial relationship? That is nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 07:52 PM
1

I assumed steroids ended up damaging your body? Which would be the only reason I wouldn't want people I know abusing them. It used to be commonly said that steroids shrink your dick so that may be why men wouldn't want people to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 07:49 PM
1

it's that there are people who exist who think that a load of 16 year old boys having a homosexual gangbang at public school is completely acceptable, but a 16 year old girl with a 20 year old man is wrong. Can you link me to an actual example of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 07:44 PM
2

Yup, white people age the worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 07:35 PM
1

Bush too. Remember the establishment wanted another Bush vs. Clinton election. Many Republicans fled to the most independent candidate they possible could which was Trump. Since the Republicans put up so many other niche candidates it allowed the protest votes for Trump to carry a lot more weight. The same phenomenon sort of happened with the Democrats as well as a huge portion of Democrats are sick of the Clintons but the Clinton power machine has a much stronger hold on the DNC than the Bushes…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 07:31 PM
1

If I wear a t-shirt and shorts I still get ID'd sometimes (I am over 40) but if I wear business casual, never.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:49 PM
1

their also rich unlike your average Joe But they are being compared with other rich and famous guys in their 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:41 PM
1

Well Bieber is a thing.. Not for girls who are out of high school ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:40 PM
1

Well I'm 25 and if I met a 40yo guy who by all appearances seemed to have it all going on PLUS good personality and game etc The 40 year old men I know that date girls in their early 20s? You would never have any clue how old they were unless you checked their ID. From just appearances you would think 26-31 at most.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:39 PM
1

Oh I think there'd be some interest but 40 just seems old. The 1960s called and wants its attitude back 40 is the new 29 ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:36 PM
2

I know what most women in my social circles, in my geographic cultural area find attractive because I discuss with them. FTFY Unless you think your social circles and city culture is representative of the entire world(which I would say its absolutely not if you are actually Greek)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:33 PM
0

Do you know many 20 years old women that fuck 40 years olds? I don't. I actually don't know anyone like that and Yup. More common than you think. Maybe its just where you live and the circles you hang out in. unless you're a millionaire, it's not going to happen. Incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:31 PM
1

No such thing as "peak SMV age for all men". Some peak in high school so 18. Some peak in mid-20s so 25 and some peak later at 30-35.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:29 PM
1

1.not rape 2.rape 3.rape 4.rape 5.not rape 6.rape
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:24 PM
1

What is 'MGTOW' and why is TRP so obsessed with these asinine acronyms?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:20 PM
1

most of the men who reproduced after world war I and world war II were over, were still not sexually desired by the women who settled with them. So you are making things up out of the thin air to fit your pre-conceived viewpoint? Or you actually have evidence of this assertion?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 06:18 PM
1

Feel free to believe whatever you want. I can't find the study I was thinking on Google which basically showed that in a situation where there was 0% of getting caught stealing, not everyone stole. The study I did find did disprove the original assertion I was arguing against. If I find the specific study on stealing I'll link it. Also feel free to link your study that shows 100% of people will cheat/ steal given your specific circumstance.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 07:44 PM
4

Again I think you are missing the point of themed parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 07:04 PM
2

Doing awful things. It's like throwing a Great Gatsby themed party. You aren't getting the point. I think you are not getting the point of a "themed party".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 06:16 PM
1

That is not what I requested. Cheating and stealing are not the same thing. I asked for a study about stealing. Couldn't find the one I was thinking of on 10 seconds of Google but it doesn't really matter because as I mentioned I was countering other assertions. I don't have to prove that not everyone would cheat/steal. You/the other poster have to prove your assertion that everyone would cheat/steal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 05:08 PM
4

If the hypergamy/polygyny dymamic is true Its not true though. I have never seen any of the redpill assumptions supported or proven in any way. The reality is that biology only provides baseline ranges. How those manifest can be very different. Its why its nature via nurture not nature vs. nurture. Thus, the way things really work out in the real world are some women are polyarmorous. Some men are hypergamous. Some of both are naturally monogamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 05:00 PM
1

Haha, oh, but the number of them who want my 'real phone number' and my 'real name' and who want to go on an unpaid date at some point, or marry me or whatever, would strongly suggest otherwise. Most of my regular clients are very emotionally attached to me (and I basically only do regulars). I'm less emotionally attached to them, b/c obviously for me the whole thing is a performance. I think the consistency and safety of it is a greater factor than the no-strings factor I wouldn't call what I a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 04:47 PM
2

I question the mental health of anyone who is "hurt" by a change in their partner's appearance. Good lord. Exactly! If that is someone's mindset they have deeper issues to work on methinks
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 04:43 PM
1

Not sure what this has to do with the initial claims and how that study doesn't prove the initial strong claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 04:41 PM
1

Great, so you found one study that documented people's behavior under one set of circumstances. Yes because you asked for: I want to see even one study that has established this. So I provided you that. Now you want to move the goalposts. I'm not writing an academic essay on this for you. Believe what you want. I already provided a study to support my take that it is incorrect to state that "Everyone will cheat,etc". So far no evidence has been presented to support that initial assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 04:39 PM
3

I am reminded of the old saying , they aren't paying you for sex or conversation, they are paying you to leave afterwards without drama or emotional attachment. It's worth the money because a man can feel the companionship when desired without the commitment and drama of a wife or gf. Although I imagine some of your clients are married as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 10:15 PM
2

I agree with /u/Yabusama2k. The only slut shaming I witness off the Internet is from upper middle class and private school girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 09:46 PM
2

How would they even know it was intended to be "hurtful" ? No girl I date would even think my shaving practices were somehow about her. If she did she sounds like a drama queen and to be avoided. And likewise if I complimented my girls current haircut and next day she changed it I wouldn't even think about it the way you are. In fact if you were my friend and brought up this scenario I would tell you to chill the fuck out and stop taking things so ludicrously personal
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 08:57 PM
7

It's like if a girl says "JAMIE I LOVE UR BEARD" and I shave it the next day. It's hurtful. This is nonsense and just ridiculous. Anyone that considers it "hurtful" if someone changes their haircut or beard is clearly overly sensitive. I've had a lot of GFs change haircuts without consulting me and I never once would have even considered it hurtful. That is such a weird thing to get offended by.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 08:50 PM
1

No matter the circumstances, it appears that some people simply will not cheat. In Gino and Ariely’s 2011 work —the studies on self-control and mental fatigue—certain people didn’t cheat no matter how tired they became. Individuals who rated characteristics like honesty, fairness, and compassion as more important remained immune to the cheating temptation. A solid moral compass can, in other words, lead one safely through dim rooms with graffiti-covered walls. http://www.newyorker.com/tech/eleme…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 07:03 PM
1

Due to ita short sighted one child policy and patriarchal preference for male baby over female, China faces some of the worst demographic challenges where in the millennial generation male outnumber female by several tens of millions. However bad you think the demographics are in the west there are much worse ratios in China (and the middle east incidentally)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 05:43 PM
3

Not really. First you played a bit loose with percentages and how you are paraphrasing. the study claimed about twice as many women as men passed on genetics so 40% compared to 80. No idea why you are making up 20% for men. Second the problem with your interpretation is that it doesn't reflect how the study was conducted. Its saying over human history this was the pattern. So you have to take into account other factors like wars and how far more men die in war than women. Classic example being R…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 05:31 PM
2

Less than 40% of men pass their genes on, while 80% of women do. Source? I think you are referencing the study mentioned here but you are interrupting it in a bizarre manner. http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/20/is-there-anything-good-about-men-and-other-tricky-questions/?_r=0
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 05:04 PM
1

Sure. If they learn game and adopt successful strategies like in Art of Seduction
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 05:01 PM
3

So no supporting evidence to back up your view? Just your personal opinion ? Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 04:59 PM
2

Sounds like a typical case of confirmation bias for the TRP
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 04:53 PM
3

You got some actual scientific study to back up this claim that "everyone" will cheat and steal in some circumstances? Because I have seen studies that show the opposite, not everyone will steal if given the opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 04:51 PM
4

Are they the best to do the job of raising sons? Probably not. I have seen an awful lot of examples of married couples and even the prototypical alpha male do absolutely shitty jobs of raising sons. Todd Marinovich being a famous example I have seen played out many times.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 04:47 PM
5

Hypergamy- both men and women can naturally be polyamorous, hypergamous and/ or monogamous. Briffaults law- well it's not a law scientifically speaking but I'd say it's mostly true. AWALT- No, it's the height of pop psychology rubbish to start making gender wide generalizations based on anecdotes. Can't have female friend- this is rubbish although obviously everyone should pick their friends wisely. A lot of men are shitty friends too. Not sure what the other buzzwords mean and don't have time t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 04:40 PM
1

Why are so many people under 21 drinking at a nightclub? Y'all have fake IDS?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 04:28 PM
1

Underwater basket weaving pays surprisingly well Al Czervik!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 09:48 AM
1

Who is Sheryl Sandberg and how is so powerful ?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 05:41 PM
3

College is for pussies. It's the military or trade school for you. Later I'll help you start your own business. The world needs ditch diggers too. You sound like one!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 04:23 PM
1

Not at the level I'm talking about. Ultimately status trumps looks for men to attract women
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 12:02 AM
1

Sorry you feel that way. I have some awesome female friends that aren't like how you say at all. They definitely aren't the majority of women at all but they aren't some ultra rare unicorn either. Maybe it's where you live.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 11:30 PM
1

They do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 01:41 AM
3

Those are all different categories losers You'd have to give me a concrete definition here as that is very subjective. poor, thug types This might seem counter-intuitive at first but neither being poor nor being a thug precludes one from having status,especially in certain communities/sexual markets. In fact to counter your point: how come some scarred "ugly" thugs get laid much more than some pretty boy non-edgy poor people? Status in those communities. Also to go even further perceived status …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 09:30 PM
3

Status is not just fame but famous people do have status. Status doesn't necessarily have to have fame involved and I personally think very high status gets someone far further than just very high looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 09:26 PM
5

Status is most important all things considered more than looks. Status > looks
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 08:25 PM
1

Yes but there are a lot of caveats to be met for it to be an honest successful friendship with attraction. Also matters if attraction is two way or one way as those are different sets of experience and difficulties.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 08:22 PM
2

Just Google Zola Trap twitter story then plenty of blogs sum it up
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 08:15 PM
1

Got within an INCH of opening pandoras box but stopped. Literally or figuratively ? ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 08:10 PM
1

You should start a Rate Men's Hands thread !
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 08:05 PM
3

Are your hands and nails attractive enough that any woman looking at them would think "oh ok I wouldn't mind having those between my legs?" Yes. Out of dozens of girls I have never had one even suggest a manicure and many girls have commented I have great nails. I'm not sure what not great nails look like but even way back when I was bartending in college I never heard a female Co worker ever say any man should get a manicure. Maybe it's a metro sexual thing or maybe no man I've been friends wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 07:56 PM
3

But pimps are not commonly sleeping with the prostitutes. Why do you think this ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 07:53 PM
1

This story answers some of your questions https://storify.com/yomike/a-wild-weekend-in-florida
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 07:52 PM
3

Every man should goto the nail salon? You've got to be kidding me I agree 100% that men should care about grooming and learn how to dress , etc but there is literally no reason for me to ever goto a nail salon
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 07:46 PM
1

Social media memes are not representative of all media. The stigma against single parents is far older but still strong. For decades conservative media has Harped against those deadbeat single welfare moms. Tom Lykis who has a much larger audience has railed against single moms since the 1990s. I have been a single father the last 10+ years and exepreienced the stigma first hand. I do disagree with the feminist crap about only single moms having a stigma. no, single dad's face social stigma as w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 07:24 PM
2

You must watch much different media than me the last twenty years if you actually believe all this crap lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 06:22 PM
1

No. Every divorce I've known personally was more around 6-9 years like your median and off the top of my head I can't think of many four year relationships. Most of mine and friends and family are either shorter like 1-2 years or much longer than 4
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 05:22 PM
3

statistical norm. Can you link me to studies about this alleged "statistical norm" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 04:42 PM
2

Clearly you have the wrong kind of female friends lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 04:16 PM
2

There's a reason why many of these guys are going to TRP in droves (they really have no where else to turn to talk about these things) Do you think that's part of the problem? I mean when I was an incel teenager there was no Internet, smart phones or anything. Incel teenagers only had their high school friends and maybe extended family. in one sense this forces people to learn how to socialize more effectively because there was no easy echo chambers. Then once out of high school most would goto …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:48 PM
1

I prefer to be partnered with someone that views sex and sexuality in a similar manner as I do. Anyone with an N of 26 obviously doesn't share the same PoV on sexuality. Well at some point in their lives perhaps. They might share your view now but didn't 8 years ago. Anyway, its just a very bizarre metric to me. The higher the N count, the more likely a person is to be unfaithful. There is no direct correlation, but again this is all about hedging bets, and a percentage point is a percentage poi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:52 PM
0

So you can't see that some people may find that a primary concern in their relationships? I mean, do you want your SO to have common values in general? The same political views? Religious? How is sexuality any different? I don't see how simply the number of previous sexual partners is remotely comparable to having the same religious or political views which encompass a lot more than just the number of previous partners. It sounds more analogous to the One Issue Voter than anything else. In sever…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:21 PM
1

Perhaps someone with an N of say 5 that would much prefer to be with someone that has a similar background? Their background is defined by number of previous sexual partners? I can't relate to "wanting to be with someone with roughly the same number of previous sexual partners in any way. Seems like a very bizarre metric to use in relationships. Maybe someone that is disturbed by the thought of casual sex Someone is disturbed if someone once had casual sex at an earlier point in their lives? Sou…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 05:35 PM
2

EVERY woman will cheat given the right time, right man, right circumstances, and low risk of detection. conspiracy theory level comment. You phrased so it cannot be disproven and you can simply explain away any example that contradicts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 05:28 PM
1

A woman that slept with 25 guys through college then marries and remains faithful the rest of her life STILL has an N of 26 in that scenario how is her "N of 26" relevant in any way? Who cares what her "N" is if she is remaining faithful rest of her life?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 05:19 PM
1

1) Men are polygamous, 2)Women are hypergamous Pseudo-science rubbish. The reality is that polygamy, hypergamy and monogamy are all natural mating strategies of both male and female homo sapiens. How successful each is depends entirely on culture, era and other external factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 04:14 PM
1

Yeah you don't know what the word means. You are applying your own personal definition but hey if it works for you go for it chap.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 02:00 AM
1

Would you rather have sex with a fat ugly booty call or masturbate?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 01:59 AM
1

The guy is angry, bitter and thick. Reading this blog was a waste of my time
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 01:41 AM
1

You don't seem to understand what the word coward means
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 01:40 AM
2

Question. There are two parties on Saturday night: One party has 95 men and 5 women attending. The other party has 48 men and 52 women attending. Do you believe both parties have an equal chance of having a fight break out?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 04:07 PM
4

Successful mating strategy is a bit more complicated than even just the r/k divide but this post is a step in the right direction in showing the limitations and arbitrary nature of redpill psuedo-science.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 04:03 PM
3

I'm disappointed that you're calling me a straight up liar. I feel like I've always approached you with at least some level of respect. Do you know how uncomfortable it is repeating these comments to a male superior? There's no satisfying resolution when a customer talks about your tits. It's shocking when it happens, so you pretend it didn't. Yup. When I tended bar the waitresses would mention comments like that a lot but rarely told the manager because they felt that would just make things wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 08:50 PM
1

o you agree that people can have serious, reasonable, moral objections to abortion? I agree that some people think there are serious reasons and I can respect that as a person. But I have yet to read a moral philosophy argument that opposes abortion that I see as a sound argument. Some might be valid but I have yet to see a sound argument because I don't think the premises are accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 08:39 PM
1

If you are advertising a specific strength then you shouldn't be surprised if that aspect that you spend time advertising gets more attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 08:29 PM
1

So you can never discuss anything on a purely moral level? You can never separate public policy recommendations from critical moral reasoning? You are strawmanning my point of view with these questions phrased how they are- probably unintentional. To clarify, for me personally the pragmatic reasons to have abortion legal 100% trump any "moral" objections. Also for me personally, I don't find the moral objections to abortion to be compelling arguments at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 08:28 PM
1

I think they're wearing low cut shirts to draw the attention of attractive men, who they hope will then become attracted to the whole package. Do you see the logical flaw in this comment? Women wear sexually revealing clothes because they want men to think their personality is sexy? c'mon now
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 08:18 PM
1

'women' don't tell men this. Only hardcore feminists tell men this. I have dozens of female friends who 'objectify' women right along with me (many are bi admittedly).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 08:16 PM
6

(how much would it hurt if I pushed a needle through my arm I can't relate to you at all but good luck with everything!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 08:13 PM
1

Men with money have far more opportunities than men without money. Most men have more money in their 30s than their 20s. I don't really have time (or enough context on you specifically) to elaborate more on this one if that's what you meant: To illustrate this I've been attending some of the night clubs that I'd try to attend in my early 20s, they are high class joints and not those piss up super clubs, they usually cater for wealthier kids up to the age of 25-26. but the bolded part is pretty c…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 08:12 PM
1

Because the pragmatic reasons trump any "moral" objections
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 08:08 PM
1

I disagree. There are plenty of opportunities for men over 30 and in the right circumstances many more opportunities. I can see a lot of things wrong in what you are doing strategically though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 04:33 PM
6

So you are teenagers that are emulating Jackass?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 04:29 PM
1

Well said and your comments echo my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 04:24 PM
1

all I said in this thread was that there are actual, serious moral reasons people oppose abortion. And I am saying I can't take those "moral reasons" seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 04:16 PM
1

You really don't understand that your anecdotal experience cannot draw absolute conclusions as you try to do. Not surprised based on your posting history
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 04:15 PM
1

Go ahead and link pinkers rebuttal and let's debate it then. And yes it is relevant because you have to take pragmatic results into account and not just debate abstract theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 11:19 PM
0

Simple. I have never seen any such thing reported by any incel, current or former. You should probably hold off from ad hominem attacks when you make such a basic error in logic as the one you just made here
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 11:17 PM
1

Do you have a wife and kids? Divorced with grown kids. Already "bet the kids and family" on my views which aren't really TRP or TBP and this whole RPvsBP reference point is very new and amusing to me. Your frame for this debate didn't even exist when I did it and both sides from what I see oversimplify and get things wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 10:03 PM
1

http://www.nber.org/papers/w8004 And there is serious academic research that argues for abortion from a macro perspective on reduced crime which produces a better overall society.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 09:49 PM
2

Excellent succinct summary of the four actual deeper positions on the issue that most people fall into. IMO these four categories should inform abortion debate more than the annoying pro life vs pro choice die hards
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 09:47 PM
1

No. Drug laws should be changed. The government shouldn't be able to draft you involuntarily and I personally believe a right to body autonomy is more important than almost every right in the Bill of Rights. I respect you feel different but body autonomy should IMO be one cornerstone of a Bill of Rights more than even free speech or right to guns as both pragmatic free speech and gun rights can derive from body autonomy rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 09:42 PM
1

Only if you really good at kajira training
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 09:03 PM
1

plenty of members of incel communities have gone that route, and not one's life was changed for the better. How can you speak for every single one and claim "not one life changed for the better". Have you spoken to every single incel? No. Logically of seeing a prostitution DID help an incel they wouldn't necessarily still be posting get on some subreddit so your logic is inherently invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 08:51 PM
1

I gamble a whole family of 3 children and a wife that I am right. What more than words do you gamble? What more than a criticism do you have to offer? Or can I expect silence? A cute quip? A meaningless nothing to rinse your hands of action? Is this English? I read the post you replied to and not sure how your comment relates or what you want him to bet on. Also pretty silly for you to bet other human beings. Are you a slave owner ?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 08:45 PM
1

We all know that in our current feminist world misogyny is defined as questioning a woman's intentions in any way, or treating them like men. Odd assertion since I haven't ever seen misogyny defined that way. Maybe in the weird world of extremist feminist vs. Extremist anti-feminist that's true but your definition doesn't reflect my experience in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 07:59 PM
3

Hahaha I felt the same way when I inadvertently wasted a day few months ago reading up on "gamergate" just to learn that partisan sjw and anti-sjw are both nutcases ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 07:46 PM
1

graffiti artists/ skateboarder types for some women for the edgy factor, sure video gamers sure for some girls I met, some are very much into thrill seekers which confers a sense of danger that appeals evolutionarily to many women, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 07:45 PM
2

Why is this an either/or ? Obviously you want both cooking and cleaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 07:06 PM
4

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 07:02 PM
4

I think those are anti-'social justice warrior' buzzwords relating to the 'gamergate' controversy or something that some millennials are blowing way out of proportion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 07:00 PM
1

Oh I get your point. I come from the belief though that evolutionary biology just manifests different so a high earning woman that doesn't care about her lover's occupation is still attracted to qualities that evolved from biology - for instance she wants a tall, fit man because those traits for thousands of years signal "provider".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 06:58 PM
1

so you would say that 'hypergamy' which seems to be a core pillar of the red pill certainly doesn't apply to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 06:55 PM
1

Sure. But there are other niches like that as well that involve status and fun/thrill seeking.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 06:54 PM
1

I never said looks don't matter, they simply are less visual than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 06:53 PM
2

so you are married to someone who makes far less money than you and always will? He is basically your trophy husband? pure eye candy and nothing more?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 12:46 AM
1

money can generate excitement though. I'd agree you have to have some game but if you are rich and have some game you can get a lot of hot P whether you trad hot or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 12:37 AM
1

They would probably describe them as "rugged," "sexy," or "cute" or "handsome." I doubt rugged, cute or handsome would be used but yes they think they are sexy, but that is not solely derived from physical looks
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 12:31 AM
1

fame is hot to some girls though
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 12:30 AM
1

Money does not sexually arouse women. I disagree. It does sexually arouse some women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 12:30 AM
1

Musicians have their own appeal in being fun and rebellious. Terrible for marriage of course. They're the other side that complements athletes for younger women. Ah maybe you missed what I was trying to say or I didn't phrase it well. When I bring in the evolutionary biology about women evolutionarily being attracted to protectors and providers I wasn't implying anything along "marriage" lines. Just that those evolutionary impulses can manifest in different ways even when they just teens. What m…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 06:40 PM
1

Yes. Also it might not have been the most accurate term, I just liked the phonetic contrast of visual/visceral ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 06:35 PM
1

Okay, by your theory then hot teens and hot early 20s girls never go for the ugly musicians like Skrillex and Jimmy Page ... that's not reality sorry lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 06:35 PM
1

How many women do you see in their early twenties dating med and law students who are physically unattractive? How many are dating guys with less promising careers who are physically attractive? How many content themselves with hookups while they focus on other things? No matter how I answer that question its still just an anecdote the same as whatever you experienced. But for the record I have seen plenty of 20-somethings hot girls dating guys that are not six pack gym lifters but either alread…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 06:29 PM
1

Here you go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WeaXYZxre8
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 06:23 PM
2

Well I've come across some arrogant millennials who hate on men over 30 too but I'm probably getting sidetracked here. Also yeah thats silly, I probably know dozens of women over 30 who are hotter than most of the 19 year old sheltered virgins the RP gets all hyped up about
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 06:20 PM
1

So you are a pleasure delayer like Tom Cruise in Vanilla Sky?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 06:17 PM
2

Women are not generally attracted to stability as such when they are in their early and mid twenties. I'd disagree with this. Women in the early 20s are attracted to: money (sign of lifelong stability) professional aspirations (women are attracted to men in law school, med school, etc) physically fit men (this is a older evolutionary biology paradigm but tall, fit men were the best providers and protectors for hundreds of thousands of years so that is still in there) All three are signs of poten…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 06:13 PM
1

you're 'disgusted' by anyone over the age of 30. The misogyny comes in when you start dehumanising these women because you don't find them fuckable or relationship worthy. I'm not sure that's misogyny per se but more the result of silly teenager/early 20s arrogance.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 06:09 PM
0

I wouldn't use the word "ever". You'd be surprised the weird custody settlements I've seen from the courts. Its a crazy process, I'd recommend avoiding the courts altogether if at all possible in any divorce (I realize its not possible to avoid in some cases).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 05:54 PM
1

If we are being reductionist then no because men evolved to be attracted to the most fit women while women evolved to be attracted to the most stable/protective/provider men. Men are more visual while women are more visceral.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 05:53 PM
1

Which works only if you have exes who get along extremely well Doesn't have to be get along extremely well. Just has to be cordial and not crazy sauce. Trust me mate, I did it lol only if you have exes who live in the same locality. Not sure what you mean by same locality. I would phrase it as same metropolitan area but most divorces in my experience don't involve one person suddenly moving to another city. But then I always lived in a large metropolitan areas so maybe its different for people i…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 05:50 PM
0

Its not the most common solution, but sometimes the children live in the same house and the man and woman switch off roughly 50% of the time living in the house with both having alternate apartments/houses. Its what I did.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 05:46 PM
1

Sluthate, from what I can see, is just a pure, concentrated hit of random, inchoate misogyny, most of it strongly reeking of giggling stoner. Huh? How do you relate sluthate from RP with being a stoner? Very bizarre magical thinking there mate
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 05:41 PM
1

I don't think the young millennial red pillers understand what a slut is lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 05:37 PM
1

I love sluts and some single moms (the ones that don't want insta-family). As a divorced man that wants no LTR or anything like that sluts and some single moms are the absolute best! Silly Tom Leykis always telling young'uns to not date single moms but it was great for me. Women over 30 is usually a miss for me unless they are also divorced and don't have a typical settle down/get married/have kids mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 05:30 PM
1

This is why women have an easier time of maintaining mixed-gender friendships - sure it stings to get rejected, but most women have natural abundance mentality and get over it in about 5 minutes. Women only have an easier time if they are not the ones who got rejected. A women who got "friendzoned" or "fuckzoned" by man she wants to fuck/relationship is NOT going to be capable of just hanging out with the man afterwards. Women generally cannot deal with rejection well at all and from my experien…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 05:17 PM
2

based on your description it sounds like pimp might be one of those other things ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 05:45 PM
2

I've had the (dis)pleasure of visiting the trailer parks my family owns. Your family are slum lords?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 05:13 PM
3

Introduce your female friend to all your "nice guy" male friends. Observe what happens while she dates different ones. Get back to us in a month with feedback.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 05:10 PM
1

Thats more of a myth than reality or you just have vastly different experiences than myself. I seen plenty of first date fucks end up wifing up and other girls made guys wait and they still end up in a drama filled 2 year dynsfunctional BS>
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 05:07 PM
1

None of these are meaningful distinctions for me. Every single pairing I would answer: depends on the unique circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 05:02 PM
1

They are not 'needed' as my historical and ape examples show but they exist because humans are social and cultural animals. There have always been societal and cultural constructs that provide structure for acceptable mating and reproductive strategies and that varies culture to culture. Monogamy is no less natural to humans than polygamy or 'hypergamy'. Polygamy though is proven game theory wise in evolutionary biology at least but hypergamy is a much more pseudo scientific and certainly
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 11:48 PM
1

You are misusing the term natural because by definition it means naturally occurring in the world. Pair bonding (monogamy) occurs in the animal kingdom and even more relevantly in other apes. So you can't call it "unnatural". Next, you can't just assert "hypergamy and polygyny being the natural sexual strategies of men and women" because thats not really what evolutionary biology shows specifically. Both of those are successful strategies only in certain cases. Since homo sapiens became a ration…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 10:51 PM
2

Monogamy is unnatural. On what basis do you call pair bonding unnatural? It's observable in the natural world among different species and in some species it provides a distinct evolutionary advantage. You are incorrect to call natural pair bonding (monogamy) unnatural as it is a natural manifestation of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 10:35 PM
1

Buddhism is often called an atheistic religion and it's definitely a system that you pick and choose concepts ans disregard others much mire than the three Abrahamic religions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 10:34 PM
2

Uh I don't think anyone that watched Forrest Gump when it came out thought that. It was always a tragedy with a few quotable cute moments. I don't know maybe Millenials that never watched it think that?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 09:52 PM
1

Professional athletes in the western world are much more than just 1000 and I also gave another example of other communities (conservative religious) that encompass much broader bases. There are also other communities that are less well known but have similar attitudes to professional sports as well such as commercial diving. Like I said, what you said is true for many western communities but the assertion There's no reason at all for a gay man today to remain closeted is just flat out wrong bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 05:30 PM
1

Thats true in most social circles but not all. For instance how many professional athletes in team sports like football or soccer do you think are gay compared to how many pro athletes in team sports are openly gay? Yes, Caitlyn Jenner got a lot of positive publicity and so did German professional Thomas Hitzlsperger but both did it after they retired and in Jenner's case long after stopped competing publicly in sports. In the NFL, NBA, Premier League or Bundesliga? There is still a lot of reaso…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 05:20 PM
1

"young, innocent, attractive, petite girl who is also caring and submissive/supportive" That goes a bit against evolutionary biology as that would not be the ideal breeding mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 05:05 PM
2

Orgasm yoga is also a new trendy thing http://www.self.com/sex-love/2016/04/i-tried-orgasmic-yoga-and-heres-what-happened/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 04:02 PM
1

Oh hey if you are editting your first post you could put a link to Styleforum up there as well . It's a massive forum but has a lot of resources on dressing from trad styles to trendy styles from Europe and Asia.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 03:57 PM
1

That's very true. And sometimes yea a child can completely change someone's life for the better. I'm always hesitant though if someone just "wants a baby" ya know ?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 03:53 PM
1

Spot on about market value.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 03:51 PM
2

Yes! I don't think some people (like my friends that sadly shopped at Men's Warehouse) realize that you can find great discounted top quality clothes with just a little research and time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 03:49 PM
1

Tailors are definitely the only way to go for a real expensive suit. Shame that occupation is disappearing more and more and old school high quality shops are disappearing now like Rizzo in Boston closed. That Armani isn't bad but for that money I'd rather get a Hong Kong bespoke with the exact fabric I choose myself or go on Gilt and get a discounted Brioni ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 03:45 PM
1

I don't know if I call that a trump card because if a women is having a child just to avoid being lonely it's almost certainly a recipe for disaster. It can quickly turn into resentment which is very bad in some cases I unfortunately witnessed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 03:34 PM
1

Market value is not an objective thing that is the point a lot of people don't seem to understand at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 03:20 PM
2

The value of a commodity is not innate, it is determined by what price the market will tolerate. The value of my gas, per my example, is $5/gallon. Yeah I don't think most TRP people understand economics all that well since most of them misuse the SMV metaphor all the time and don't even understand how market value is a metaphor to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 03:20 PM
2

Superb post. It's interesting because back in the 1940s GQ actually used to be a valuable men's magazine that went over a lot of things about male grooming and nuanced things like what color shirts and suits look best based on your skin tone and hair color. It's a shame GQ got away from being a useful tool to just become a useless advertisement vehicle for bad clothing lines that got popular (Armani for instance. You'll never catch a man who actually knows good clothes in cheaply made overpriced…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 03:02 PM
1

GayLubeOil admits that they're just trying to be edgelords to attract attention. Doesn't the wanna-be edgy name GayLubeOil give away that he is a troll with nothing of value to offer ?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 02:53 PM
1

In the movie hypothetically someone else like the boyfriend could have reported it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 09:59 PM
1

You clearly do because if you understood trans girls you wouldn't have phrased the post the way you did. If you had any clue whatsoever you would have said gay male cross dressers. As it stands your OP is total bullshit and reflects a complate misunderstanding of trans.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 04:42 AM
1

Your scenario is completely unrealistic. Like not even remotely close to reality. Trans girls would never want to fuck a guy with their dick. You literally don't have any clue what it means to be trans to even make this post. Trans girls are girls stuck in a mans body. The last thing they want is to fuck a guy like a gay male. They want to be fucked like a girl. This post is more wrong than you even realize kiddo
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 04:26 AM
2

I do get that. But also I think the movie was trying to show that if the hot girl gave the nerd a chance she would be more satisfied. It was definitely a crude scene that couldn't be made today (blazing saddles couldn't be either) but for some reason it doesn't creep me out like that because she did like it and become his GF
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 10:19 PM
1

Well I wouldn't have thought a law could allow some ambulance chaser to sue McDonald's over coffee either but the happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 10:16 PM
2

It's funny how your posts are so packed with confirmation bias. People post links to threads that show there are also women attracted to any given male and you deny it as unreal but your own troll link you seem to accept as 100% fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 10:15 PM
1

I already read the article. My point is if the law is applied to examples in the OP like lying about your job then the law is bullshit IMO Obviously the case of the assistant assaulting the women in dental office is rape but the prosthetic penis and lying about career should absolutely not be rape
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 09:21 PM
1

No I'm asking more if you think it would be justice if he was charged for rape if she consented after the mask was off and became his girlfriend. I know it's fiction movie but it does represent one of the fine lines this law toes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 09:18 PM
1

The fact that she enjoys it and becomes his girlfriend doesn't make it less uncomfortable for you ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 09:10 PM
1

Would you consider it justice if he ended up being charged for rape even if she consented once she found out the truth and became his girlfriend as happens in the movie?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 09:07 PM
1

I was more interested in people personal opinion rather than legal technicalities
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 08:57 PM
1

Whatever mate, if you want to believe femnazis that look like that have such better opportunities than you do then keep on believing that instead of working on changing your reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 08:56 PM
1

Of course not in a criminal way but using a prosthetic penis or lying about your occupation is not defrauding someone in a criminal way either which is my point. This law is utterly moronic and will lead to a helluva lot more trouble than any good to come out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:54 PM
1

Padded bras are deception.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:45 PM
2

Thats not an scientifically valid "experiment". I have no way of knowing if that thread isn't just some photoshopped trolling. Random post on internet forum =/= a valid experiment. Also that doesn't take the femnazi personality into account which is part of being equivalent to the bitter whiny incels on Reddit that claim no women in the world exists who would sleep with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:43 PM
1

From personal experience? No not ugly and fat girls. Average looking to attractive girls that have certain fetishes which is what your general attitude isn't taking into account at all. I get your point but your take is rather limited. Power does increase sexual attraction from some girls. I'm not talking about really ugly or obese professors either. I'm not saying that intelligence and power can overcome any level of physical unattractiveness. But if you don't think intellectual superiority and…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:32 PM
1

That doesn't explain the college girls that fuck average looking average body professors after they took the class or ones that they were never direct students of. Your perception is just limited to your experiences it seems which isn't very diverse
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:22 PM
1

Was the scene in Revenge of the Nerds rape ? Can a girl consent after the fact as she did in the movie thus nullifying the deception ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:11 PM
1

A femnazi that looks like that probably has the exact same prospects as the equivalent incel men
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:06 PM
1

You're missing the point. Power is an alpha quality and turns on to some woman. Nothing to do with relationships here I'm just saying power does increase sexual options and nothing in your post contradicts what I'm saying. You just subjectively claiming you don't consider that "sex" but that's your own thing. And let's not get anecdotal. How many college girls have I seen fuck or want to fuck non fit professors? A lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:04 PM
1

This is just dumb. It could work in reverse too. Women wears a padded bra would be rape by these definitions
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:01 PM
2

So to you that scene in Revenge of the Nerds was totally rape ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:59 PM
1

Well you're moving the goalposts to your personal subjective standard then. Power can get a man more sex with some women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:54 PM
1

Point being monica wasn't sucking Bill's dick cause he was physically hot she was sucking his dick cause he was the most powerful man in the world. To deny that some women have a power fetish ignores reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:50 PM
1

So you really think femnazi that looks like this women is flooded with dating requests? https://okathleen.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/lfcfan.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:22 PM
2

Question ,do you think Monica Lewinsky was really sucking off Slick Willy because he was physically hot or because the fact that he was the most powerful man in the world makes him hot to some women? While agree with most of your post you are underestimating the fetish for power in some women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 02:51 PM
1

The problem here is you are using incel as a defining descriptor for a category in a way that isn't analogous to the other categories. For instance two incel might be completely different and incel for totally different reasons. One might have severe social anxiety and depression while the other might have a major physical handicap. While both might be incel the cause for incel is very different and would require different solutions. Your phrasing is also tautology based. "Why aren't there women…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 02:42 PM
1

You mean fascism? Sure it can "work" but as we saw when it was attempted it marginalizes much of the population and often ends up counter productive. Plato was very ignorant about a lot of things and shite as a political philosopher.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 02:31 PM
1

You don't know what you are talking about so cheers bub
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:21 PM
1

It differs person to person. So people are far more attracted to attractive faces and don't care as much about body. Others are much more attracted to very fit bodies even with a butter face
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:19 PM
1

I guess you don't understand argument by analogy then. "Sexual market value" is a metaphor.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:18 PM
2

Thats some extreme hyperbole there. NO idea why you would even make such a shitpost
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:15 PM
1

It is but I see this everyday so its not surprising to me. Maybe its just the industries I've worked and where I lived that this phenomenon seems so obvious to me. Some people think others are very attractive while they are simply not attractive to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:13 PM
1

Do you understand the limitations of argument by analogy?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:11 PM
12

Of course. I've long said the biggest error in TRP thinking is that SMV is some fixed number rather than a range where different people find different things attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 12:58 AM
0

From my experience the type of slut marriages /u/PemBayliss is talking about are more common in the lower classes whereas the slut marriages you are talking where they face no repercussions and seamlessly transit from sluts to wives happens with th4 upper middle class more frequently. Upper middle class sluts are rarely doomed to the failed marriage their poor counterparts on the other side of the tracks are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 08:53 PM
1

Why is it not possible though?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 07:29 PM
1

Evolutionary biology. Biologically men most successfully reproductive strategy is to chase and spread seed as much as possivle. Women most successful strategy is to choose best reliable provider for the kids she carries. This leads to a men chase and women select playing field. It's also why men that would rather select than chase are considered more negatively as betas and women that chase are considered negatively as sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 06:58 PM
1

He is not a serial rapist or a child molester. Those are sexual predators. You don't actually know this. Just because he has only been caught once does not mean he is definitely not a serial predator. He made a mistake, He made a bigger mistake than most men would ever come close to making. Its a mistake that is well outside the norm for rational, well adjusted behavior. showed remorse His comments at the trial and letter do not show any remorse but rather a weak attempt to blame campus drinking…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 06:42 PM
1

Sure I am just saying it's a tricky issue to quantify in one size fits all manner that won't have exceptions ya
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 10:15 PM
1

He reads your little book which gives him overnight strategies like touching women's arms, being playful, making eye contact, whatever the fuck. Does so in a date. Complete strawman that shows you don't even know the content of the book or how to apply it. Maybe watch the Mystery PUA show. Anyway have fun with your defeatist attitude, I'm off to the pub
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 10:14 PM
1

Checked it out, it tells you to improve social skills and flirting first, which is what I said. Neither of those take a year at the least bruh lol You can literally read the book and make improvements overnight. Maybe not as drastic improvements as you would like but its really, truly not that hard. Just drop the defeatist mentality =D
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 09:46 PM
1

I guess that explains why I am more a Robert Greene/Tom Lykis guy myself and don't self-identify with red pill on Reddit even though I oppose aggro feminism. That post has a tone of bitterness that I simply cannot relate to and I personally perceive people like that dude as total "loser betas". Not sure how that clown's post fulfills any alpha credentials at all. Its whiny, loser, slave mentality crap. Tom Lykis has much more calm and respectful views (although I still disagree with him on singl…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 09:43 PM
1

No, there are literally millions of guys that you called a "waste of human life" living in Japan alone. Millions of guys (and girls) living at home with the parents? Yes. Millions of guys that fulfill every criteria on your list? I call bullshit there. You would need to provide evidence for that one. Just because someone is living at home with their parents doesn't mean they qualify for having "no ambition", have bad hygiene, etc. I've known a lot of people over the years who have to live with p…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 09:38 PM
1

Then why are men attracted to women with no body hair. I can only speak for myself. Preference for no hair was not actually natural preference. I learned that preference due to feeling. For me personally, I vastly prefer the feeling of bare flesh on bare flesh to full bush/stubble/ etc which feels much worse for me (and almost all the girls I have been with). After I developed that preference for no hair based on how it feels, then the attraction to the look of no hair followed my realization th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 09:33 PM
7

This is exactly what I've been saying. He messed up. He isn't a sexual predator waiting in the darkness. How can you claim with certainty that he is not a sexual predator? How do we know he would not have repeated this action had he not been interrupted and stopped by two random passers-by? How do we know this isn't like catching Bill Cosby early on before he has a long list of victims?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 09:26 PM
1

It's pretty rare compared to the human world population, yes, which means there are millions of guys like that. Naw, millions of guys might think they are that. That's my point. Guys that think they fulfill your full list of loser qualities are pretty rare. But even they actually don't. Like the UCSB shooter that perceived himself as having a much less sexual prospects than he actually had. Actual examples of someone who actually fulfills all things on your loser list is the mythical unicorn. I …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 09:18 PM
1

The modern alpha isn't a lumberjack or a cop. He is a deadbeat dad who doesn't care for his kids. He is also a poor specimen of masculinity no matter how much assertiveness he has and how jacked he is. So what exactly makes this man an alpha? The fact he is buff?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 09:13 PM
2

it's hard to really see an asian "Chad". You've never been to Hawai'i then ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 09:04 PM
1

Ah, wow. That goes way beyond anything Lykis says. If that person isn't just being a deranged teenage troll then they have some serious mental health issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 09:01 PM
1

Oh, I see. You're just calling all self-improvement to someone's a SMV a "strategy" now. Uh, self-improvement is a strategy. I gave you the definition to what strategy means but you didn't click the link so here. "In game theory, player's strategy is any of the options he or she can choose in a setting where the outcome depends not only on his own actions but on the action of others.[1] A player's strategy will determine the action the player will take at any stage of the game. "The strategy con…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:59 PM
1

So the range doesn't fluctuate much, and they needed to make improvements before getting back to the normal range, not just changing strategy. You are missing my point. To clarify: Everyone has a baseline SMV range. Some ranges are wider than others. Even those with the most limited range say "SMV=1-3" can still improve to the top end of their range by adopting optimal strategies. You can maximize your natural or current baseline with strategy. Obviously some random broke obese man cannot turn i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:33 PM
1

So the range doesn't fluctuate much, and they needed to make improvements before getting back to the normal range, not just changing strategy. Dude, you are missing my point. To use your stupid RP metaphor and clarify Everyone has a baseline SMV range. Some ranges are wider than others. Even those with the most limited range say "SMV=1-3" can still improve to the top end of their range by employing different optimal strategies. You can maximize your natural or current baseline with strategy. Obv…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:32 PM
1

Listen, you haven't seen enough men outside of the club to know there are people out there who are just repulsive. This is where its time to just ignore you since you keep insisting you know exactly what my experiences and what I have and haven't seen when I'm quite sure I am much older than you and seen far more of the world than you. You seem to base your view of the world on incel forums instead of actual real life. If you don't want to read Art of Seduction to understand my point better why …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:20 PM
1

That's a fair way of putting it. I was thinking of the classic "lie about being sick to get off work" angle and how that would fit in.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:11 PM
1

I haven't seen anyone call single mothers subhuman scum, not sure where you get that. I know that Tom Lykis would always tell guys on his radio show not to date single mothers (which I 100% disagreed with) if thats what you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:09 PM
2

Why not? If you believe 12 is too young to consent aren't they both too young to consent? What metric are you using to separate that situation from say a 17 year old with a 15 year old?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 07:57 PM
1

So SMV isn't "moment-to-moment" in that case. That was what I said - I can know what someone's SMV is at the time he gives me the relevant information, not what he's going to transform to after reading self-help books. You seem to be taking things overly literally. SMV is something that changes moment to moment. Every new person you speak with is a new interaction where you can have vastly different SMV than in the interaction with a completely different the moment before. I was merely addressin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 07:54 PM
1

Right now I'm simply insisting to you that some people can't suddenly change their prospects with some kind of "strategy" or different clothing or different dating platform without working on their behavior, social skills and possibly looks or status first. Its like anything. You don't transform overnight. However...it doesn't take long to start seeing some progress. That is the key. Just like lifting or dieting or developing a new skill. Of course you don't master it overnight but once you see …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 04:22 PM
1

No, this is a ridiculous comparison. Not valid in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 04:18 PM
1

What if its two twelve year olds? Are they both guilty of sexual assaut?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 04:10 PM
1

its potentially as healthy/unhealthy as any first sexual experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 04:09 PM
1

If they develop a successful strategy it would be through year of hard work Insisting that any development of a successful strategy would take at least a year is both a completely arbitrary opinion and a defeatist attitude. You won't care, you won't listen, because you don't understand some men just have a repulsive personality. You will uselessly babble on for years with unfalsifiable statements on new strategies and environments without addressing the actual problem. Too vague to be of any use…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 04:02 PM
10

That study measures gender disparity in aggregate. It does not offer any supporting evidence for your specific assertion: Women systematically get away with crimes easily, especially sex-related crimes, even against children. In fact, the authors specifically EXCLUDE the exact type of crimes you are talking about:: "In order to achieve better overlap between the male and female samples, I also excluded several case categories in which the arrestees were over 95% male: sex and pornography-related…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 03:56 PM
1

If some incel puts a million dollars in your hand and asks you to help him get laid from moment to moment, you'll never be able to do it no matter which corner of the earth you take him to or what you dress him in. Someone with a monster face and social autism is not attractive to any woman under any circumstance. Again this sounds like your obsession with this mythical unicorn man that is so epically ugly, stupid, talentless and hopeless that nothing coud possibly help him. You are arguing pure…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 03:34 PM
3

Women systematically get away with crimes easily, especially sex-related crimes, even against children. Evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 03:25 PM
1

Any form of any type of deception is immoral to you? Irrespective of context? Or would you agree that deception being immoral is context dependent?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 03:02 PM
1

Fixed SMV for life? No, not for most people. Fixed SMV at a given moment of inspection? Yes. I am saying that the language I see these new school red pillers like yourself use makes SMV sound a lot less flexible and a lot less adjustable moment to moment than is actually the reality. Also this style of thinking where you are "taking points off" in your head sounds like a ridiculously unnecessary and useless exercise but if it works for you I guess use it. For me, the red pill language makes thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 03:01 PM
1

What do you mean about de-humanize singe mothers? Also, what about a female simply deciding to get an abortion even if the man is willing to take care of the baby as a single father?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 02:56 PM
1

It does, its just a different style of coquette than what women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 02:55 PM
1

Why is lying to a gold digger immoral to you? Is the gold digger herself on the same level of immoral as the air bnb liar?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 01:22 AM
1

I am curious. Let's say I rent an air bnb mansion for a night and I take home a gold digger telling her I own the house just so I'll get laid. You seriously think that level of deception is remotely equivalent to Bernie Madoff ?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 01:17 AM
3

What do you find immoral about sexual strategy?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 01:12 AM
1

Greece doesn't exactly have a booming economy so all the Greek gold diggers left for better pasture;)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:50 PM
1

Sorry I'm not sure what you're asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:43 PM
1

Oh I just read a thread a while ago and some red pillers were putting down art of Seduction claiming it only applies to "high value men" which is total BS. Just found it ironic that a lot of the best red piller stuff is just aped from Robert Greene and anyone really seeking help should just go to the source.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:41 PM
1

Lol so much of that link is just rehashing a sub chapter in Art of Seduction on how to keep LTR prospects into you if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:33 PM
1

So basically just being a coquette?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:26 PM
1

I guess I didn't realize that anyone was claiming that sexual attraction isn't based on biology. I thought the whole homosexuality is genetic not a choice science ended that once and for all since sexual orientation isn't just gay or straight. I'm fairly new to this whole pill debate thing. Found this sub randomly from a trump or Bernie sub months ago. I'm not really big on the feminist vs MRA debate but for some reason I enjoy some of the conversation here even if I think some on both sides are…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:20 PM
1

Would you believe me if I told I hadn't even seen this line yet before wiring my former paragraph? It's exactly as I thought. Personality types and style. These are not in my SMV list. Yes and this is where we disagree because I think good looks is subjective once you get passed some obvious thresholds of course. Same with social anxiety. It seems to me you are talking about a pretty tiny percentage of the male population that can't meet basic physical or social thresholds. Otherwise it's about …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:10 PM
1

I don't understand the controversy about saying who you are attracted to is controlled by biological imperatives. I mean that's pretty obvious to me. Its like if I am not attracted to Asians am I racist? Or if I have an Asian girl fetish and only want to bang asian girls am I somehow anti other races?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 09:56 PM
1

SMV = Look, charisma, success, ambition, humor, intelligence, confidence, talent, fame, social status, social skills The most important thing is having game. The other thing this list doesn't take into account is the dynamic nature of context. To put it in those economic metaphor terms there is not one sexual market, there are hundreds and thousands of different markets. A cowboy has high smv in the stagecoach market but would have low smv at a goth concert. This is something I don't see discuss…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 08:12 PM
2

Imo all these new school acronyms and dating apps over complicate things that are really simple if you follow two steps. First know thyself. Know what you want. Millions of people fail at this simple steps of self awareness. Learn what you want. Not what society tells you to want , not what your family or friends want but learn what you actually want. Is it really a LTR or marriage? Is it casual sex with multiple partners? Is it FWB ? Would you rather just focus on career and visit hookups when …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 07:20 PM
1

We could also gauge someone's "SMV" by how much success he had with women, rather than what we think his success will be based on his appearance or personality. I think that I can safely yes that someone who has approached 100 women of different backgrounds and attractiveness, in different platforms, and got brutally rejected by all, has less SMV than someone who doesn't have an issue finding a hookup for the night. And I can quantify it numerically based on what the disparity in the rejection r…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 06:11 PM
1

This is why it does not make sense for a young woman to go ahead, get drunk in the company of strangers and then expect to be safe. Pretty sure that it was not a conscious chain of decision making like you imply. Also it does sound like you are victim blaming but whatevs Also if he was not stopped in the act of attempted rape he would have complated the act. I can call him a rapist and be perfectly morally okay with it. Legally he is not a "convicted rapist" but rather a "convicted sexual assaul…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 06:00 PM
2

This is the wisest statement I have seen on this subreddit. Well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 05:57 PM
2

No one in our cutthroat capitalistic society is happy, except for the very rich. Ah but this is wrong. Probably true for most but I am not very rich and despite the fact I'm in "mid life crisis" I've never been happier. Happiness physically maxes out monetarily at around $77K anyway. Know thyself. Most people on today's multi media blitz generation don't know what they really want. The secret is knowing / discovering what you really want out of life. Most are unhappy because they haven't figured…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 11:07 PM
3

Statutory rape and forceful rape are two very different things. I don't even put them in the same ballpark. One is a violent crime, the other is a crime by legal technicalities of certain jurisdictions. If a drunk driver kills someone drunk they do get slightly less than pre meditated homicide but the difference is in degrees and not analogous to this slap on the wrist. Being drunk is never an excuse for commiting a violent crime. I was a hardcore partier for years and never violently sexually a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:28 PM
1

Let the punishment fit the crime is always interesting to think about. Maybe Brock should be subjected to a forceful rape of his anus and throat against his will so he can know how it feels. Or maybe just be chemically castrated. If the death penalty is OK for murderers maybe rapists should get raped as punishment. I'm not serious but I do wonder how people like Brock would feel if they were forced to live what they did to others
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:16 PM
8

He only did it once. He was drunk. Neither of these is morally or legally relevant in any way. I've never murdered anyone. If I show up at your house drunk and murder your family is that less horrific because I was drunk and it was my first killing spree? You'd agree I should get leniency because I was drunk? Really bad logic there
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:10 PM
10

Uh, the same way a drunk driver is still responsible for vehicular manslaughter if he runs over and kills a drunk pedestrian.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:07 PM
1

If their SMV is 2, they won't. If their SMV is 8, they will, but then they'll have an easy time finding non-obese girls too. Its troublesome to try to quantify a subjective and relative concept like sexual market value as an objective numeric value. Especially when you are using an economic metaphor to begin with. The core concept is fairly accurate observationaly but trying to quantify a relative concept into a number is a fool's errand and gets into pseudo-science territory. First, lets break …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 09:23 PM
2

Well cheers then. As I said I've never met anyone IRL with standards as low as yours so you should have an easy time finding someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 08:21 PM
2

The entire tone of the posts in this thread has the undertone of complaining and whining. I assumed from your post on your insanely low standards for someone you would date that you were an incel trying to get laid I guess not?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 07:35 PM
2

Anything invented by a troubadour can't be trusted
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 07:22 PM
2

I'd argue it started with WASPs who selectively enforce their dominant paradigm on society. Its religious evangelists who are the totalitarians.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 07:21 PM
2

I have no interest in seducing women, though. Then what are you complaining about? You want a relationship but don't want to put any effort into finding one? Even a one night stand? Sorry mate, I don't get what your goal is here. It sounded like you were upset because you wanted to get laid but can't but now you don't want to put any work in?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 07:13 PM
2

I said they are 100% more likely than women This paraphrasing doesn't make sense. Here is what the study says: But, when the suggestion turned sexual, the difference in responses between the genders was stark. None of the women agreed to go to bed with their male askers, and only one agreed to visit a male experimenter's apartment. On the other hand, roughly three-quarters of propositioned males were happy to oblige such titillating proposals. None of the women and 75% of men. If you are going t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 07:11 PM
2

You never try to date or have sex with obese girls Well you are right about that lol. And you don't speak to men who do. That's why you speculate wrongly on their accessibility. This is where you are dead wrong. I tended bar for 3 years during university, often on 'club' nights. I am well aware of how much more accesible obese girls are than average girls let alone hot girls. Actually you can even find hot girls that will sleep with anyone, just have to find the ones with low self-esteem. Dude, …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 07:05 PM
3

On one level sure, because of evolutionary biology as already explained. But I disagree that so many men have this standard of simply "willing to have sex with me" for dating. You have the lowest standards for dating of any person I have ever met so I wouldn't take your own opinions as representative of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 07:00 PM
1

Ah I finally found a post by someone who actually understands evolutionary biology and not just some pop psychology TRP/SJW rubbish. =)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 06:54 PM
1

Countless of social experiments and surveys have shown that men are 100% ( Yes, 100% ) Link me to these surveys. I have never seen any study in any department of social science that has 100% rate of anything. And myself, I would definitely not automatically accept any random proposition for sex. So your premise that you are basing this on is just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 06:49 PM
2

The qualities I look for are moral code, ideology, open-mindedness, not being judgmental, supportive, empathetic, tolerant, good listener.. All of those could easily be found in a homeless, not very intelligent, mousy, illiterate and lonesome girl. These are the lowest standards I have ever heard from a man to date. I assume you mean dating here and not just a slumpbuster? Do you not care if the girl is obese? If you don't mind obese then it should be easy to find someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 06:41 PM
1

The qualities I look for are moral code, ideology, open-mindedness, not being judgmental, supportive, empathetic, tolerant, good listener.. All of those could easily be found in a homeless, not very intelligent, mousy, illiterate and lonesome girl. These are the lowest standards I have ever heard from any man or women in looking for a partner. If your standards are that low is it really hard to find someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 06:38 PM
3

If women are the ones checking all over the area for the best restaurant in town, some guys are the type to pass by a fast food joint, take a look, say "good enough" and get to eating. Even if they could explore their options more. This would be that guy taking the best option for him. He just values convenience more than he values gourmet. The principle is actually the same as /u/utigers is saying. People just value things differently. You are correct though that there is a psychological standa…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 06:24 PM
4

Sexual assault has a legal definition and it would really come down to who sounded more believable. But based on her story this guy is a creeper and I wouldn't be surprised if he did sexually assault someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 06:15 PM
2

Honestly, Brock Turner was stupid. Brock Allen Turner is a rapist and Brock Turner is a sexual offender. On the other hand, how women keep placing themselves in risky situations by getting blackout drunk at frat parties but expecting nothing bad to happen is beyond me. There is no other hand. Just because someone gets black out drunk doesn't mean they deserve to get raped. ffs, some people are thick
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 06:13 PM
5

Thats not an accurate summary of what appears to have happened based on the trial and the two sober witnesses who stopped it in progress.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 09:28 PM
3

I lack empathy for both SJW people and MRA people. What does that make me?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 09:25 PM
1

Maybe I should have named myself BadAnalogyBot because yes, I can't help but point out bad analogies when I see them. It makes kittens cry ya know
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 09:22 PM
1

That's only basic beginner strategy though. There are a number of different fit girls who are more valuable even to a pure red piller as just a pure platonic friend. One negative reason is drama, there is always a level of drama that doesn't make sex worth it. Another positive reason is if the girl is an alpha connector. A connector is more beneficial as a platonic friend even to a shark because it's more valuable to have access to that circle of people and always be on the good side of the alph…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 09:13 PM
1

Actually sucking at a sport and being a good coach are two totally different things. A lot of great coaches sucked at playing the sport because their minds understood it better than their bodies. Ask Jose Mourinho
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 08:59 PM
4

Ah see but this is the point. You've only had to deal with romantic rejection a few times. The average man (not even talking really unsuccessful betas) has had hundreds of rejections. Even attractive successful men have had at least doZens of romantic rejections
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 09:05 PM
5

No the one who never tries again is a loser. Winners don't let rejection stop them. Those who succeed the most also have failed the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 07:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter