TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Numerous1 Archive

View 0 posts and 306 comments by Numerous1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Yeah. I always did terrible on any app and had much better time building new relationships in person. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 08:58 AM
2

What cult shit are you talking about?
/r/MensRights15/04/26 09:52 PM
2

Funnily enough my wife is a PT
/r/MensRights14/04/26 02:53 PM
2

Plus he gives great handjobs
/r/MensRights14/04/26 02:53 PM
3

Yeah, that is pretty fucking insane.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 06:39 PM
5

Or they do and your foot hurts or whatever trump did.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 06:38 PM
2

Ah, gotcha. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 04:52 PM
0

Do you think accidents don’t exist at all and that every single pregnancy is an intentional choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 04:45 PM
1

I didn’t think I needed to expand this line of thought but I will. Everyone likes different things. Some people may click in bed immediately and some may take work to figure out what their partner likes. But, there is definitely a bad in bed. For example: it’s possible you could sleep with 50 partners and all of them didn’t enjoy the experience very much. That would be bad in bed. Yes specific things are subjective, and I’m not saying you are guaranteed to be exactly what someone likes as long a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:47 PM
1

No no no. There is absolutely a good in bed and bad in bed. It’s just everyone has different things they like.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:36 PM
1

I find that odd but most of the people I know with kids have the moms either working part time or full time so it’s a different setup.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 06:45 PM
1

Maybe im misunderstanding. Are you saying you have never even heard of a woman that has access to a card tied to the account? Or do you mean that dictates where all excess earnings goes without husband input?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 03:25 PM
4

I mean, doesn’t the song say he’s a pretty consistent wife beater?
/r/MensRights31/03/26 10:36 PM
0

Yeah. Listened to it the other day. It’s the same as Gunpowder and Lead where he beats on her and she has a gun. As it turns out wife beating is bad.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 10:34 PM
1

A man saying “hey can I buy you a drink” is not a commitment for sex. Obviously. But it’s also, just as obviously, an indication of interest. And if you aren’t interested the person usually denies the drink. Now I knew a girl in college who had a few girlfriends. All of them has boyfriends. She told me the girls would go to the bars an hour before their boyfriends and look cute and single and get drinks bought for them before their boyfriends came. So that seem scummy to me. And your examples se…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 01:51 AM
1

Lying for pretty much anything is bad though. Lying to get laid is bad. Lying to get someone to buy you a drink is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 01:36 AM
2

Counter point of view: if somebody is trying to shit test me I don’t want to talk to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:27 PM
9

Points for honesty I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 04:45 PM
2

Hey OP. Sorry if you already answered this. What kind of prenup are you trying to do? Like a straight 50/50 or you keep that whole sum you have or what?
/r/MensRights20/02/26 04:15 PM
-3

Yes let’s use one of the richest and famous people of all time who is significantly older. This is a good comparison 👍
/r/MensRights20/02/26 04:14 PM
0

Yeah. This is what’s really getting me. I’m all for the prenup but “I’ve been aggressively saving and I have 3/4 of my annual saved up” sounds pretty funny. Like don’t get me wrong. It’s a lot of money. I don’t have 120,000, saved up. But before we got married my wife and I both had about 100% of our annual saved up. Now idk what kind of prenup OP is looking for but at this level I figure it makes the most sense to just split everything 50/50. I guess OP could be wanting to keep the entire sum?
/r/MensRights20/02/26 04:12 PM
1

I’m confused. Paraphrasing to “I love spouse” is virtue signaling?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 04:20 PM
3

I’m a man who is very pro men’s rights. I just read all the comments here and I think I can add something that I haven’t seen posted yet to “help” explain the point of view behind this poisonous bullshit. I don’t remember the exact reference, but I believe there is some magical 1 out of 3 statistic or study or whatever that anybody making this argument is using. But I believe it’s 1 of 3 women have been sexually harassed in some way maybe? I want to say that sounds familiar to me. Now, if I am r…
/r/MensRights09/09/25 11:01 PM
3

It reads as a teenage description of the classic “bad boy versus safe guy” debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 08:53 PM
14

I have a buddy who is like that except the height. He’s like 5’9 but always has girls after him. One time when I was still single but he was married we went to a music festival and this insanely hot woman randomly came up to us and started hitting on him. Not like “she turned around and said hi” like she walked a long way over. So he is being friendly but not really engaging, just generic “oh yeah how are you music is good” stuff. We could tell she had been drinking but wasn’t drunk or anything.…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:39 PM
6

Yeah. I’ve done Oktoberfest a few times and there were always some single women there, not single as in alone, they usually had some friends, but no boyfriend around. Some obviously open to meeting a guy. Idk.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:34 PM
14

It’s kind of funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:28 PM
–

Eh. I think there are some people that might need a conversation about having a checklist that’s too much. NOT standards. But a crazy checklist. I’ve seen it before. I’ve seen the alone, childless, at 40, doesn’t understand why, when in reality her checklist is one of the crazier things I’ve seen for dating. It would be like a joke setup in a comedy show. But at the same time, it’s not my life. People can do whatever they want. I don’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 02:37 PM
–

I mean, kind of yeah. I’m assuming this was an attempt to poke fun at OP and I don’t agree with those things but it’s not my life. You do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 02:33 PM
1

See, I personally don’t read it as patronizing. But I can see Thst train of though. I read it the same way I think about a “local business” (though to a lesser degree) Meaning: If it can get the job done in a price or quality similar to a big corporate business then I MIGHT pick the local business. Or I might not. If I can support local and it doesn’t negatively affect me TOO much, then I will when I’m able and feel like it. But I won’t make a big deal about going local. if the price is too diff…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 01:51 PM
2

Yeah. All the top comments are “it’s saying women are better than men!” But that’s not what the purpose of them is. It’s “this business is owned by a woman so money pleaseeee” I believe the argument is “less women businesses out there. Historically less opportunities. Support them if you want to” but I personally don’t care about them.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 04:37 AM
4

I literally didn’t believe it. Like, I googled it expecting to be able to be like “oh no here is what they REALLY DID and it’s nowhere near as bad” but nope. Holy shit. Fucking France…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 03:49 PM
0

Like I said, I 100% it should be auto at the hospital. Shit, you could even blood test the mom also under the guise of making sure the baby wasn’t accidentally swapped. And you make a good point. I absolutely would/did not get married without taking financials first. But what do you think of my (albeit not 100% comparable) example of the “let me see all your phone information” thing. You could argue that falls under “Trust but verify”. Edit to add: now that I think about it. You bring your a goo…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 02:08 PM
8

Holy shit. wtf France. That’s insane.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 07:12 AM
0

Eh. I’m a man and idk if it’s BAFFLING. Let’s try to think of an equivalent. Obviously paternity test isn’t viable but idk. If you had to let turn on gps and her go through every part of your phone and login to every account and read every message? Obviously it’s not the same but I’m trying to think of an equivalent. Like, I’m all for hospitals making it standard. Like make it part of the OB process or something. I say great. Go for it. But actively asking for it can be considered “just being sa…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 07:11 AM
3

I highly agree with this answer. I’ll just add that some women do have higher libidos and some women do have compulsive (spontaneous) libidos. So idk all the factors that set those things
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:02 PM
0

Don’t bother with this lot
/r/MensRights18/06/25 10:05 AM
17

I would like a little more info about this myself. Like, I’ve been married for 6 years and I’ve stayed my wedding weight and my wife has gained some weight. Like 15 pounds. But I was always packing extra weight and she wasn’t. So now she just has more Of a belly like I do. I also didn’t have 2 kids in that time period. So I guess in my mind, “yeah sure she was in better shape when we got married. But we get older. She looks more like I do now. And she had kids. I am still attracted to her” so I …
/r/MensRights17/06/25 07:21 PM
4

When people online automatically attribute somebody asking about their partner’s sexual history to be some big huge evil thing. Obviously it CAN be for bad reasons. But in general I think it’s fine to be curious and ask some high level questions just to get a surface impression of someone else. My wife and I had been dating for like 2 months when she asked me how many partners I’ve had. It doesn’t mean she’s some “body count” obsessed monster.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 04:32 PM
4

Exactly. Like, that’s literally the purpose of putting ‘toxic’ in front of ‘masculinity’. Yo describe the masculinity of toxic. It’s like saying “managers” versus “bad managers”. Sure there are a lot of bad managers out there. But not all managers are bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 04:30 PM
–

Yes it is! It’s like a car! You just gotta get in there and fix it! Obviously! People cannot be different, people cannot be incompatible, People cannot hold grudges or change! Just go be a mechanic! I never do this, but I feel that some people here need to see it /s
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 02:40 AM
–

Yeah. I cannot remember how strict the rules on this sub are, but let’s just say “this guy ain’t it”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 02:36 AM
9

Have a good one bro. You sound more argumentative than interested I what I have to say. If I say “yes” then what? We have a “one said it’s this way and one said it isn’t” thing. Not intersted.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:26 AM
10

Sorry bro. You’re “most said yes” is abnormal for any generation. Don’t try to make this a “women just wanted attention back thank thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:12 AM
5

There’s a difference between FIX a person with one or more large flaws/issues and just giving someone a chance/time to fix things. Nobody is perfect. I love my wife to pieces and there are still things we are learning and growing and working on. Individually and as a couple. But I think the big difference is to fix someone is a drastic change that has a “new” person whereas improving, while can be big, is still the same person. Just better.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 08:03 PM
2

I just can not with this slideshow format.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 09:30 PM
4

Yeah, that matches my experience. But have you ever heard someone in real life say “men have to pay due to the hidden debt of patriarchy ” or whatever?
/r/MensRights24/04/25 02:09 PM
2

I’ve paid for pretty much all the first dates I’ve been on. I’m not asking that. I’m asking about the how often do you see someone say the “it’s all 50/50” but then don’t actually do it? I see it a lot online but not a lot in person. Obviously that’s just my experience hence why I’m asking.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 02:08 PM
-14

I’ve never been mr. Date Man but let’s be careful about real life versus online discourse. Do you encounter this quite a bit in real life?
/r/MensRights24/04/25 11:32 AM
2

I’m not going to claim to be an expert on this. But the financial sense part for stay at home parent can be rough. I worked with a woman who went back to work in her 30’s from being Stu’s at home mom for awhile. They had to pay for daycare and after daycare costs her take home was only like $750 a month for a whole month of work. But they needed thrust 750. It’s rough out there.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 08:00 AM
–

See, you do you. And you can say “he has to be the hottest guy in the world or I’m not interested” do whatever makes you happy n
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 07:00 PM
–

Well, in my eyes the problem was she WAS desperate. She complained all the time. But even if she wasn’t desperate idk. That just seemed like a lot of controlling points that just didn’t seem realistic to me. She can have those standards I guess. It wasn’t hurting me. Like I said, I didn’t say anything to her. But she was unhappy about it. But I personally don’t think her lowering her standards in this case is bad or desperate. I think it would be accepting the difference between a realistic stan…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 06:26 PM
–

The only time I’ve ever thought a woman’s standards were too high when she has this massive checklist that makes it seem very unlikely that she would ever even meet someone that fits all the criteria, let alone fall in love. It was like the usual stuff about money and physique but it was also stuff about how when he proposed he has to do it in a VERY detailed specific way and the ring has to be a certain (really high) price because (“I’m worth it”) and he had to be okay with her planning everyth…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 05:38 PM
3

I don’t really have much to contribute except to say Jesus Christ. Apparently no matter what someone’s flair is, every comment here seems crazy to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:17 PM
4

“They’re there for good.” But if you did to Your family the kind of thing that leads to divorce they would leave to. Go sleep with your best friends wife, Or your bothers, and tell me how permanet it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 08:56 PM
8

Yeah. If you replace “husband material” with “keeper” it’s the exact same sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 08:31 PM
2

We have whites, delicates, all other adults, and then all kids. So 4 types. But we also both do the laundry so.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 02:40 AM
6

Yeah. Anytime you say “I make more money so…” you guys are not being a team. Now you can say “hey. Let’s talk about changing our situation. I think your time might be better spent doing XYZ since my job brings home 90% of the money. What are your thoughts?” Like obviously you have to be practical when making choices about life. But on a day to day basis “I bring home the money…” isn’t good.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 02:39 AM
5

Just the style of writing is…odd.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 03:51 PM
2

I use “my ex girlfriend” about once a year and my wife is never impressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 02:54 PM
3

You said “dates”. But can we agree that 1 date is not an automatic “I can not talk to anyone else at all”? And if we agree that 1 date is not automatic then where is the “line”? 2 stars? 3 dates? Etc. My personal experience had times such as “I can’t find a person to date organically so I’m doing online dating. I have a date in a week and a half with somebody I was chatting with”. Does this mean I shouldn’t talk to anyone else? Or once again for me was “hey I went on one date. We have another on…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:28 PM
3

Okay, so, the way I see it is if it’s 3-4 months. And when you first go on a date it involves somebody brand new. I don’t think it’s reasonable to say “we went on one day we are exclusive partners”. I also don’t think it’s reasonable to wait until somebody says “I love you” to agree that you are exclusive partners. There should be some sort of middle ground that is after the first date but before the “I love you” phase where you both agree. “We are exclusive partners” verbally and there is no am…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:06 PM
3

How fast do you say “I love you”?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:11 PM
2

I’m just personally surprised with the idea of “oh if he doesn’t want to bring it up I’ll just let things stay as they are”. It just seems super passive to me. I’m not there isn’t a period of “wait and see” but eventually if he doesn’t say something then maybe you should? Idk.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:10 PM
3

Sorry, I meant I know people that would hook up with someone but not date them. And vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 10:44 PM
9

All I see are replies saying this, but I have definitely known plenty of men and women who this was not the case for.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 09:03 PM
–

Yeah. I’m fine with varying levels of attractiveness. And you need to like what you like. But I’ve hung out with this dude that seems to like a woman but he doesn’t think she’s attractive enough for him like, socially I guess? So he would make weird comments that were negative about her but I didn’t feel like he felt that way. I felt it was stuff he felt he had to say. Idk.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:51 PM
–

Right? It’s weird/awesome. My wife looks different from when we got together. She’s older. She’s not in as good of shape. Whereas I look the exact same as when we got together. You know why? Because she’s always been hotter than me. I was already out of shape when we got together and being in a long term loving relationship and bearing our two beautiful children has an effect on the body. But my favorites part is? I still find her sexy as hell. Before I found her I read a story about a woman in …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:12 PM
–

Shit sorry. I replied to the wrong comment earlier. It was just the typical “no baby I love only you. She is crazy. She likes me but I’m definitely not sleeping with her behind your back”
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 09:43 PM
–

They were lies that work on younger impressionable people, but if you’ve seen some stuff you know not to believe them. We are generalizing as a whole. I don’t really see how saying “wow she’s a waitress at 18 instead of magically being a paralegal at 18 means anything. My whole point is: the premise of “some people do target younger adults because they are more naive or less experienced” is totally valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 05:36 PM
40

So, I’ve worked at a restaurant and seen a coworker who was a totally messed up manipulator and he purposefully targeted the younger waitresses and hostesses and some of the lies he got away with are insane. I can’t imagine they would work on women that had more experience. I think theres is a portion of younger adult women that can be manipulated by these older men. By no means all of them, but I do think it’s out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 08:34 PM
1

So, A maid who cleans doesn’t pick up at all. They clean the house. They do not tidy the house. So you still have to pickup Laundry: you hire someone to do that also. That seems a bit more expensive but okay. Cooking: so we are just ignoring dishes during the week? Do you have nothing but disposable plates and bowls and silverware you throw away? Childcare: during the day while you are at work? Sure. Idk if it’s “reasonable” but depends on what you need I guess. My parents did that when I was yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 02:44 PM
1

“Your mother liked it enough to come back for seconds, Trbebeck!”
/r/MensRights10/08/24 01:56 AM
1

It’s just a certain type of person. Don’t listen to ALL the negativity. Or at least take it with a grain of salt. I’m mid 30’s. I’ve never done this backup shit. The women ive seriously dates have not done this. (Well I guess One woman did but the relationship was over. Neither of us had pulled the trigger yet but we both checked out. we were young and dumb. ) My point is, don’t believe that this is a “basically everyone” thing.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:05 PM
11

Bro, what are you talking about? Didn’t you read the post. It’s common knowledge. You can read all about it in the scientific journal Twilight Breaking Dawn. It explains imprinting perfectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 05:44 PM
6

lol, okay. I asked those questions because they matter. It’s super easy to say “well shucks I guess I’ll keep trying” but you ignored all my other questions that are super important. You do realize that(almost) everybody that gets married thinks they will not get divorced? Like, that’s the plan. The plan is stay together for life. You mentioned “super marriage” so I read your post on that, and frankly it sounds like grand standing. As does this “no divorce” thing. Never getting remarried if your…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 08:11 AM
2

Don’t forget that who COULD choose the other option? Who would actually stand up on their wedding day and say “I want to spend the rest of my life with you…but I’m also leaving room open for divorce” Nobody. That’s who. Not a single person could get up in front of officials and future spouse and families and say that. Everybody would be pressured into the no divorce thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 08:02 AM
12

Okay. Help me out. We get married. We say “yep. Super duper. We are married forever”. Then I start sleeping with everyone and selling our stuff and crashing our cars and whatever. I insult your mom and blow your dad and blah blah blah. I’m just the worst. I’ve gone crazy and hate your guts. I have no interest in marriage counseling and etc. what happens then? Are you just legally stuck with me no matter what I do? I am now in charge of your medical decisions? Your finances? You can’t kick me out…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:58 AM
6

Don’t forget the “who could possibly enforce it and how” part, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 05:31 AM
0

Is this a troll post?
/r/MensRights06/07/24 07:04 PM
1

I see a lot of the “same views on sex. No casual sex” kind of things on here and I say good for you. More power to you. My question: do you care if people had a different outlook in the past but now agree? I’m curious because I see a lot of that on here and I wonder if somebody said “oh I tried casual sex a few times and it wasn’t for me. I only want serious relationships” would that automatically be a deal breaker?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:26 PM
1

What is naturally developed muscles with a belly mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:23 PM
1

Lol. You’re an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:00 PM
3

Well. That’s but quite a clear comparison. There is nothing wrong with having sex with your partner and nothing wrong with cleaning a shared living space. The way I see it bangmaid is a bad thing because it’s when you only want someone to fuck and someone who cleans the house. You don’t care about the person or sharng workloads or feelings or whatever. Even if there is a stay at home spouse who is totally happy with sex and cleaning. Great. No worries. As long as they are still cared for AS A PE…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 09:25 PM
4

lol. This is a good troll/copy pasta. I approve.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 09:02 PM
2

No. Money, looks, status are part of the equation. But it’s not enough. You need to like each other’s personalities. Like, people are people and some like each other and some don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 01:38 PM
2

Gotcha
/r/MensRights12/05/24 07:55 PM
2

For us it’s cleaning restrooms, vacuuming because we don’t have a good enough roomba, and just trying to clean up the kids toys (which we try to do every night anyways) it’s not super laborious but it’s not no time.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 07:08 PM
2

Cooking: please tell me 3 recipes that involve just 3 minutes of work and then appliances. I seriously need more of this in my life. Laundry: I’m going to guess it’s just laundry for 1? I have kids and I feel like it takes a lot longer than that for me to do the laundry
/r/MensRights12/05/24 07:06 PM
1

Well, you think it gives them a bad name I believe. And I think it gives them a bad name. I know they complain about the “not all men!!!” But then they shouldn’t say all men. They can just say “so many men” if they want to try and express something for what they perceive as a large number. I think that men’s spaces are being unfairly judged, but I still maintain that some simple changes can make it harder to critique our purpose.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:21 PM
8

So, just my personal point of view, the “what about ism” isn’t helpful. The question is “why does this sub have a negative reputation?” My answer is “because of the fuck all bitches!!!!” posts. And your point is totally valid. It is 100% BULLSHIT that they say “kill all men!!!”. I’m not saying they should say that. But if you have a bad day, vent your heart out about the people that screwed you. If your wife cheated, get It off your chest. You do what you need to. But if your wife cheats I don’t…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 09:59 PM
9

Been a member for years and this is my experience. Men’s rights are one thing but when some posts are “women are all bitches!!!!” Or whatever it really makes us look bad. A few months ago I felt that every other post was that. Idk if the mod team has been at work or it was some shadow movement that died out or what. I’m glad to see it’s sticking to the purpose and not rage filled women haters.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:58 PM
1

Sure but like…am I missing something here? I live in the city. I feel like almost all people who live in the city can’t randomly survive for a month. Or if they did it would be basically starved to death. Humans don’t do well by themselves in nature. We do well as a pack using technology (simple to advanced)
/r/MensRights30/04/24 01:04 PM
1

I did
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:23 PM
-1

lol okay.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:21 PM
-8

Like, there’s just so much smart ass material that you gave. But to answer the why of it: you’re “I did” adds nothing to the conversation. It doesn’t explain any reasoning. It doesn’t say that “oh I think 10% could survive and here’s why”. It isn’t even an interesting one off story about you doing it. It just seems like a weird internet brag attempt. So that’s why I provided a smart ass response.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 08:10 PM
-17

Wow. That’s. So. Very cool. And also totally helpful to my point about “I don’t think 10% of men could survive a month in the wilderness randomly”
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:08 PM
-11

I doubt the men would be in two digits either?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 05:49 PM
2

I was in a cheap town with super cheap tickets. Would see anything it was So cheap. So my buddies and I saw it. Was very surprised. Loved it. TLDR: everything was awesome.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:33 PM
2

We don’t see any Brain washing itself but the way the characters snap out of it and act so surprise and confused about wha they were doing confirms it worked like brain washing. But I agree, a very weird job of handling it.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:36 PM
4

Oh I actually really liked it. I thought most people did. I was trying to be sarcastic to the “ITS A OLATIC TOY” guy.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:35 PM
3

So are you pro or anti Lego movie?
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:09 PM
5

That’s my point, lol.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:08 PM
4

Well, it claims that Ken’s brainwashed Barbie’s so that would be a force of change. Granted it was pretty silly, and your point about Barbie manipulation is accurate. Doubly bad considering it ties into a stereotype of “woman bad and use sex to manipulate men”. But brainwashing also bad.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:01 PM
5

Just like the Lego movie…
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:00 PM
10

Yeah. This is one of those things where it’s just not equally. Child support. The draft. Pay. There’s a million things that can and should and are equal. But it’s just different this time.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 05:48 PM
4

Oh I agree things are going too far. No doubts there. I was just expressing that it sounds like you and your spouse just aren’t 100% compatible sexually. Which is fine, it’s just not ideal.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 09:42 PM
11

So, your original comment I replied to makes it sound like “men are demonized for being sexual and we can’t have sex” but your comments make it sound like you two are regularly sexually actively, and do some sorts of stuff. It sounds like what you’re taking about would just physically hurt her. Now, I’m sorry that the libido and compatibility isn’t 100% equal. I never wish that on anyone. That’s not sexuality being demonized, that’s just not wanting to be hurt. Not hurting your spouse isn’t “kee…
/r/MensRights15/03/24 09:24 PM
10

I’m sorry, but what do you mean by cutting loose? What would you do that your spouse would complain about
/r/MensRights15/03/24 09:13 PM
3

But like, what this post is taking about has nothing to do with money?
/r/MensRights14/03/24 09:17 PM
13

Somebody above linked a free version “It shows he’s interested but the woman isn’t”? “It helps him stand out” well, shouldn’t the woman want to stand out? ”It sets the tone! I want him to know he has to pay for me all the time because I’m not an equal”
/r/MensRights08/03/24 04:14 AM
11

Thanks. This is utter trash. It’s three different ways to say “I want him to pay the bill” Especially considering that many women experience the opposite: they experience men trying to pay for sex and expecting something.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 04:13 AM
6

“Create an account to read the whole story” I don’t think I will…this has got to be rage bait for account creation or something. Or just intentionally trying to get free shit and pretend to be equal at the same time. No way somebody wrote this earnestly.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 04:11 AM
22

This is the real issue. I’m tall but not much else and I had a couple of good dates from dating apps. But they started skewing more and more to “drain your money” mode.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 09:12 PM
1

Yeah. I really can’t even try with these.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:07 PM
6

This is all super awesome advice. Some of it I’ve heard before and some of it I haven’t. I just meant it’s hard to get dinner on the table when the baby won’t stop crying. I’m not saying toddlers are easier. But my toddler can play by them self as needed sometimes. So hopefully two toddlers can also.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 10:16 PM
19

I have two young kids and I find taking care of them and handling all the domestic stuff more difficult than my office job. But 1. That’s just me They are young kids. Once the younger is old enough to be even slightly self sufficient in a year or so it will be much easier. There is a time component to the kids thing.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 08:35 PM
–

lol. I literally mentioned this line of thought. Yes, everything is “transactional” but it’s not transactional the way it was described.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:30 AM
–

lol okay buddy. Good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:29 AM
–

The fact that you’re trying to codify everything into some transactional thing where if you spend X dollars for Y action and if she “charges” X+25 so I’m getting a worse deal is just…such a wrong way to look at relationships. It’s just, idk. Ridiculous. That’s not how most relationships work and it’s definitely not how a real or healthy relationship works. I know some people go with the “everything is transactional” like and sure. You want to find someone that adds value to your life and feels t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 04:11 AM
–

I feel like simplifying it to “they don’t care until they have a daughter” is a bit of an unfair statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:18 AM
–

As a man in my 30’s, I don’t think I’ve seen this idea before. this entire concept of “getting a worse deal” seems like some of the stupidest shit I’ve read here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:13 AM
3

I usually do not like the insulting nicknames about any group. Not just politics or sex, but like any. But cuckservatives is fantastic.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 02:37 PM
1

lol okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:20 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:18 PM
4

Yeah…even the “ask any man if they want a harem of beautiful ladies to sit around waiting for them”. Sure I guess that sounds good. But that’s not real life. That literally does not happen. And even if it did I wouldn’t want some sex slave “do as you’re told” thing. I want a partner. Like, some of the things being said here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 05:22 PM
1

Maybe. But I’m sure as shit not gonna ask him 🙂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 02:25 AM
16

Idk if this is some big new liberal thing. My boomer trump loving dad was surprised 10 years ago when I told him I wouldn’t date a single mother and said my standards are too high.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 02:14 AM
15

“It’s totally just science! Women are done by 20 and men are good until 50!”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 09:55 PM
-2

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 01:38 AM
–

Don’t feed the troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:03 PM
–

Wait until he watches Friends and sees those apartments .
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 03:29 PM
10

I can’t recommend lying about having a spouse or sexuality to coworkers. When that gets out it will be weird.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:50 PM
1

What a take.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:54 PM
3

We can deduce that SINCE THE DAWN OF TIME WOMEN HAVE BEEN USING MABALLEINE AND GETTING MANICURES. Are you happy now?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 04:27 PM
6

lol. Okay. Hair cutting of any kind? face, pubes, head, whatever? Hair product? Clothes? Some are nicer than others. Some fit better. Some emphasis things better. Some make you look better. Cologne? Scented deodorant? Shit, any deodorant? You can make the argument that cutting hair is different than “hiding” stuff with makeup but cologne or deodorant is the same idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 05:43 AM
1

But but but then how will you control her?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 02:11 PM
1

Competing with you in what way?
/r/MensRights15/11/23 08:09 PM
-5

lol. Good one bro. Yes people make mistakes. Yes people can have agendas. But you can’t just make a sassy comment and handwave decades of experience. 4-star general: this is a bad military situation Perfect_Sir4820: OH A 4 STAR GENERAL! WOW. I FORGOT. I BET THAT MEANS HE IS SMART!
/r/MensRights14/11/23 09:12 PM
-8

Okay. So you’re saying one of the most prolific authors in the world, who has been writing for god knows how many years, is using a basic word incorrectly. There is no way that, you know, maybe you’re the one who is wrong? It has to be him. And then instead of thinking “wait. Somebody pointed out that what I said doesn’t make sense. Maybe I made a mistake”you have the gall to double down and just assume I’m wrong too. Okay buddy. Have a good life.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 08:43 PM
-2

lol, I’m not sure if you “can read English”. I mean the multiple people on this sub that seem to be saying the same thing. But good job at deflecting away from my point of the example in your comment is not what he said and is not an example of gloating.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 08:33 PM
6

Do you guys not know what the word gloat means? Saying “well that sucked” isn’t gloating.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 07:53 PM
3

I’m very confused by your response. King said I “don’t care for them”. So yes. He doesn’t like superhero movies. He didn’t see it. Nothing wrong yet. Then “barely masked gloating over the low box office unpleasant”. You said “he judged everyone else for not going to the movie”. Except he isn’t. He didn’t say “man you should go see it or else you’re bad!” He simply said he doesn’t like people that are taking enjoyment from it failing. Did you take enjoyment from it failing? Then king finds that u…
/r/MensRights14/11/23 07:53 PM
1

I guess I’m just not sure what your point is? We can all agree being drafted sucks. I think we can all agree that men and women should be drafted equally. And I also think we will all agree that being drafted would fucking suck.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 06:26 PM
0

I agree that anybody being drafted sucks. I also agree that men and women should be drafted equally But I will say a pregnant woman is very different. She has mental, emotional, and physical changes that can affect things. I’m not saying “oh she’s pregnant she’s crazy!!” Or anything. But I don’t think it’s fair to relegate the condition of being pregnant to nothing.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:12 PM
7

She was literally drafted?
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:10 PM
1

lol. I listened to multiple clips myself. If I listen to multiple things a person intentionally and publicly posts online for consumption and I say “man. This guy is an asshole”. Then it’s pretty fucking fair for me to not keep listening to him. Nobody is being CANCELLED! The guy is an asshole. Many people don’t like listening to assholes. It doesn’t matter if he sometimes makes sense. Name any celebrity, politician, or news show that you absolutely can’t stand and I bet somebody could find poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 04:31 PM
2

Multiple times you Mention “oh people would agree with some of what Tate says!” Okay, that may be true. So what? But I also don’t agree with a lot of his shit I’ve seen. And granted I probably have only seen some of the cherry picked stuff but it doesn’t matter to me. When I see him saying that if a woman has plans of her own with her friends that’s a red flag and other stupid shit like that I don’t care to watch him. It’s not that EVERYTHING HE SAYS IS AUTOMATICALLY BAD! It’s he says bad stuff …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 01:31 PM
1

Yeah, that’s a bit crazy imo. But I guess the way I see it is kinda you can’t have it both ways. It seems weird to me to judge her for sleeping around and just sleeping with people for fun or validation when you’re readily admiring you aren’t really in a relationship with her and you don’t want to be. That you’re just sleeping with her for fun.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 04:26 PM
1

What’s a high number for you to call her a slut?
/r/MensRights02/11/23 01:53 PM
8

No worries. The people here are cray.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 08:07 PM
18

Nope. Can’t be true. You heard the post above mine. As a woman you wanted the full 9 yards just to show off to other women as a status symbol.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 07:25 PM
8

Commenting to find this later
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 06:55 PM
6

Guy friends? So saying “no friends that are men” is “protecting your relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 06:54 PM
13

It’s true. It’s obvious that every woman ever only cares about this one single day. They will stay with a guy for DECADES, their entire life, just because of that one day. All women do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 06:53 PM
2

Anybody who says shit like “Top Men can’t afford to commit to women until the prove worthy of it” are automatically shitty people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 07:35 PM
1

Okay. Obviously we aren’t going anywhere so I’ll just say I mentioned Andrew Tate You replied and said your thoughts on Andrew Tate I ask more about your thoughts on him. You keep not providing more info and instead call me names and insult me twice. So, was Tate the main point of the original discussion? No. But in discussion things you know, get discussed. People are allowed to say “oh tell me more” about something you said without it being called “derailing”. So I’ll call it a day.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 08:51 PM
1

Alright man. You do you. Name calling is all on your side.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 08:45 PM
1

Okay, honest to god, please explain to me how asking for more information about something you said being a troll or a bot or something? You said you like things he said. I simply want to know what you liked. That seems like a pretty obvious continuation of a discussion. I’m honestly floored that me wanting to hear more about something you said makes you call me those things.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 08:44 PM
1

“You call them names, ignore them, see them as lesser beings and so on” So Go find me an example of me “calling them names” I’m not ignoring anyone I’ve never said anyone is a lesser being or marginalized their feelings “And so on” isn’t really a thing I can refute So, you go read what you wrote.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 08:37 PM
0

Which of his statements do you agree with? I watched several of his things and strongly disagreed with everything he said so I didn’t continue to watch his videos.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 08:35 PM
1

Find an example of me calling someone a name please Feel free to scroll through my history
/r/MensRights28/10/23 08:34 PM
3

I’ll say that’s a possibility, sure.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 06:40 PM
1

Ill try to answer your points with my thoughts the best I can on mobile Why I’m against hating women: I personally feel that hating half of the human race is bad. I know a lot of men have been wronged and are bitter. And I don’t think it’s wrong to hate individuals that have wronged you. I do think it’s wrong to automatically assign that hated to people you don’t know. Especially because just “being a woman” does not mean they have chosen to join a group or agree with those ideas. If you say “I …
/r/MensRights28/10/23 06:39 PM
-5

I actually have made a similar comment earlier this week in regard to the people that use certain language and then being haters. I had one person say thank you and got downvotes to hell for the rest. But that’s a false point. I’m not arguing that some of the subreddits are very pro women and hating men. I’m arguing that lately I’ve seen this sub that I’ve loved for years go from being pro men with discussion to being an anti women echo chamber. With the same stupid rhetoric being tossed around.…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 06:10 PM
1

Let’s see if we can prove your theory: I personally disagree with what you said. Lately this sub HAS become an echo chamber. I further expect this will be downvoted, even though you are only supposed to downvote if something doesn’t contribute to the discussion.it snot just a matter of disageeeing. And by the very nature of this post I am contributing to the discussion. I’ve been on here for years and lately I feel it’s become more of an echo chamber. More focused on hating women instead of buil…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 02:24 PM
-1

lol, Okay big cat. Hope that’s working well for you.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 03:04 AM
-1

Wow. Such a good point. You sure showed me. “You’re on the internet too much!” Says the person who replies to me in 12 minutes. People are complicated. Life is complicated. Society is complicated. Your simplistic bullshit of “we do it to impress women there’s literally no other reason for anybody to do anything at all ever for any reason” is ridiculous. I must have missed the last meeting of All Men Ever where we voted you to speak for us.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 02:49 AM
-2

I’m sorry but if you’re going to say that men to try to impress other men or encourage other men to do stupid stuff then I don’t know what to tell you. Source: man in his 30’s
/r/MensRights24/10/23 02:31 AM
1

“Most women”. Does that mean 51%? 70% 90%?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 08:33 PM
11

Nah. You are receiving the answers why but you disagree with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 06:41 PM
8

LOL! So if I give my partner a back massage and they don’t immediately return the massage am I being used?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 06:20 PM
8

Yeah but like…everything you mentioned all sounds like variations on the same concept and treating it like three entirely different things seems a little odd but whatever. But who cares? If a woman chooses to have casual sex, and she’s happy about it, what’s the big deal? You can try to say “oh he just used you and you need to orgasm more and it’s not fair!” And on and on but really its a woman is choosing to have sex for fun and isn’t letting anyone make her feel guilt or bad about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 06:14 PM
0

Glad I could entertain? Idk, I just thought this apples versus orange comparison was not a great one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:48 AM
5

Except they intentionally come into your house at night and start gnawing holes in your clothes and other textiles. Like I’m sure I sound like an asshole right now but every example given negatively affects people. Maybe like a pillbug since they aren’t beautiful and they do get into the house? But they considers cute by some, idk.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 09:20 PM
8

Except ants are a growing infestation that spread themselves and will attack you or your small children. Even with those negatives though I leave ants alone unless they are on my property, no reason to bother them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 07:18 PM
26

Except roaches get into your house and try to spread diseases onto your food and butterflies stay the hell outside and don’t do anything. I won’t pretend there isn’t an aesthetic factor but that’s an apples to oranges comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 04:17 PM
1

Sorry, I wasn’t trying to accuse you specifically just thinking about sentiments I’ve heard in this thread. But yes, I agree it’s better to be alone than to have a bad love. But you can always try and see, and see how much she knows and what you spend, etc. there is no magic 100% guaranteed but you can try to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 02:39 PM
5

I don’t want to attack anyone but a lot of the comments on this thread are sentiments I associate with a specific type of more bitter person and it does seem a little, idk, makes me sad that they’ve had to experience such difficulties.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 02:02 PM
4

That’s a fair point. I definitely emphasize with that. I have been lonely and angry and frustrated with dating but in the long run I’ve been fairly successful and I have a partner I love. I only say that to be upfront about my next comment. I haven’t been there, but if you have had that experience then it’s not the fault of the women you are now dating in your 30’s. I can see you being upset about it, but blaming her for something she didn’t do is not good. And if you equate her with your bitter…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 02:00 PM
5

I think height ties into attraction, but yes. Attraction and money, to a degree, are important. I’m a man but when I was single I definitely wanted to be attracted to someone. That opened the door so to speak. Then I did look for a woman that is self sufficient. I didn’t need her to make a ton of money or make more than me. But I wanted a woman who can take care of herself financially when single, and can contribute to the household financially when we were married.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 01:52 PM
0

I’m sorry you’ve had struggles. But there are about a million reasons why you could be more desirable in your 30’s than in your 20’s. I met my wife years before we started dating. She had no interest in me and I didn’t have an interest in her. We We Went separate ways. Then years later we met up at a group thing and ending up hitting it off. We are both the same people we were years ago, but also different with years of growth. I’m more emotionally mature, I’m more emphatic, im more comfortable …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:57 PM
4

Do y’all actually know women who say this? Or is this all stuff read online? I’m have talked with a lot of women about intimacy in general, not this specific topic, but I’ve never met anyone that said “oh I only did XYZ when I was younger. I don’t do that now”. I’ve met people that have done stuff and chosen not to do it again or anymore. But never anything like “man I don’t do road head anymore because you only do that in your 20s”
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:53 PM
3

Eh. I don’t think pointing out that a “YouTuber” who care about making money and who has an incentive to edit videos to prove a certain is a bad thing. I could go do the exact same thing only with the opposite answers. Maybe this guy isn’t editing his results AT ALL. But we just don’t know. Most YouTube people have an agenda. I don’t mean a political agenda, I mean a selling strategy. And it’s in their benefit to play to that market segment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:49 PM
9

The thing is, like everything, you can find both sides. I’ve known women who make a lot of money who decide that since they make a lot of money they are worthy of a man who makes even more. I’ve known women who do the opposite. They say since she makes a lot of money it’s okay if a man doesn’t make as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:46 PM
0

I don’t think we have any hard percentages or numbers or anything credible to say “men are largely more disappointed”. Lately there seems to be a ton of the on this sub and it makes me sad and disappointed in us. Being a place for supporting men is good, but being a place for hating women is bad. This is mens rights not bash women. And if you check my history you’ll see me mention this a lot lately because it’s becoming a problem. And I’m replying with this message to try and hopefully reenforce…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 05:42 PM
-1

I read that Reddit sees if somebody just downvotes all your stuff and disregards it. Not sure if that’s true but I did read it somewhere.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 01:59 AM
0

I’m curious myself Are there quotes or something? Just saying “be better lol” isn’t really a good explanation.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 01:58 AM
1

I’ll be blunt. I’ve been a fan of this sub for years. I’m a man who has experienced some of the difficulties in dating, and relationships, and coworkers, and friends and family. I’ve always been able to say this sub is a good place for men to discuss their issues and get support. But lately I don’t feel good about this sub. There is a lot of hate here now. I’m assuming a lot of people have been hurt badly or been in fucked up situations. And I feel for them. But this sub used to be about support…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 01:57 AM
1

Ah, I don’t think the trailers showed that part.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 10:02 PM
0

I guess. Maybe there’s more politics than I think but the trailer I saw looks like standard person realizes it’s in a fake world and breaks out. Polks fun at stuff along the way. The Island, any distills society like Tge Giver, that Oh Darling movie, some of the Lego movie, etc
/r/MensRights22/07/23 06:45 PM
-2

Does there need to be some reason? It looks like a fun movie.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 02:14 PM
1

I personally found the “most men think marriage means sex” thing weird. On one hand, yes, I expect their to be sex, but not because we got married. We got married because of how we felt about each other and our relationship already. When I think of proposing sex was not high on the list of reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 03:38 PM
2

I’m sorry you got hurt buddy. Good luck, it’s tough out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 03:36 PM
2

Interesting indeed. I do enjoy a good fantasy novel.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 11:50 PM
0

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 04:48 PM
1

That’s going in the wrong direction even more. Time and again we see tons of totally trash guys do well at dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 03:16 PM
3

The fact that you’re missing the point, is the point. You have this definition of “high value man” that you subscribe to. But it’s not what other people would call a high value man. And you can try to argue about empirical worth with your car and watch examples, but if it was only money then you wouldn’t exclude “a rich dork” (to use your term). Many people would not call somebody who wants to be not monogamous high value, end of story, it doesn’t matter how much money they make or how attractiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 12:24 PM
7

I really can’t tell if that’s a compliment to target or an insult
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 04:40 PM
-3

This is one of the most toxic “inspirational” comments I’ve read on this site. I don’t even want to interact with whoever wrote this. But if you read this comment, yes, don’t give up, but this absolute vitriol in this comment is super disheartening. Edit: I’m a mid 30’s man, who cares about mens rights and that this community addresses our problems. Not gives bad advice So to explain why this advice is bad “Stopped allowing myself to get depressed about reality”: depression is not something that…
/r/MensRights22/05/23 10:22 PM
1

Yeah, I forgot, there’s always a treatment for everything. Not like some people sometimes just have bad things. Migraines. Back pain. Pinched nerves. Dietary issues. Crohns and IBS, etc. “Just her it cut out” yeahhhh. As it turns out taking out your large intestine is a bigger deal than just having pain sometimes.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 09:28 PM
4

Yeah. I can’t tell if it’s sarcasm or not.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 09:17 PM
1

If you think staying at home with 3-4 kids is relaxing then idk man.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 09:14 PM
-12

You’re so cool.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 05:00 AM
9

lol
/r/MensRights11/04/23 04:59 AM
1

She’s picked up some more I would say. It’s mostly we have settled into our own grooves with the baby. Her primary job when she’s home is taking care of our child, which is pretty dang exhausting. But she does pretty much all the laundry now, which we used to share. She does more straightening than before. There is a lot of stuff related to childcare that I didn’t really think about before having children that she does. And each one of the tasks may seem small but there are just more and more an…
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:19 PM
-6

Yeah, I guess I just personally think you have the totally wrong mindset. It sounds like you’re trying to make sure you get your share or get your half or whatever. I think it should be more of a “it’s us against the world. We are a team” mentality. My wife and I made almost the exact amount of money before we had our first kid. Now her job lets her work part time so she takes care of our child part time, and she works part time, whereas I work full time still. I don’t think I’m contributing mor…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:55 PM
-6

Don’t try to argue with these guys, man. This sub lately has gone from mens rights to more and more just bitter men. And I understand that some guys are bitter. And I believe that it is fully justified. I’m not trying to take that away from anyone or tell you how to feel. But when 90% of the comments are “women are bad” it’s a little disheartening.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:12 PM
-8

It really isn’t. If we are both working 40 hours a week then it doesn’t matter who is earning more, both of you are full time workers. Now, if one of you has to quit the job for whatever reason, then obviously it matters. But if y’all are both full time workers, you’re full time workers.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:06 PM
16

Yeah. There is a huge difference between “couldn’t prove in court that it was rape” and “we have evidence that you intentionally and maliciously lied about it “
/r/MensRights18/02/23 06:18 PM
1

Yeah. I only put my comment out there because I’m afraid that the people here are turning more and more into WOMEN BAD.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 10:46 PM
4

Guys. If it’s the same post I saw then she specifically said “because i would be expected to do all the household chores”. No whether or not that’s an accurate way to see the situation isn’t the point. She just said “I don’t want to go 50-50 on rent and then do all the chores too”. Which is reasonable to say. Once again, she might be totally wrong on the expectation. But saying I don’t want to do all the chores ks a reasonable thing to say.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 03:51 AM
8

Yeah…this sub seems to be veering into “angry all women are the worst things ever” territory. It was originally, and should be, a place for us to rant, discuss, and talk about our problems, and rights, and struggles. If you want to vent about how society seems to be pushing men down and how you see tons of the “world without men” comments. Then great. I love it. Let’s talk about it. Let’s ran about it. Bu this “all women are dumb bitches and the world would be a utopia without them” attitude is …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:16 PM
5

Yeah, like, this makes the “hey I just want to be sure” part LESS awkward or insulting because you don’t have to ask. It’s just “oh btw the kid is yours”
/r/MensRights25/12/22 10:07 PM
1

Lol. I was intentionally using the exact same proof that you used. “I’ve seen it happen”. You used no proof in any way whatsoever. You just said a few statements “man it’s totally the way they are wired. Just trust me” and then your only attempt at Evidence was “I’ve seen it”.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:15 PM
-3

Yeah…I have seen plenty of women who aren’t this way so…checkmate?
/r/MensRights22/12/22 04:59 AM
15

That scene was definitely very MUCH. They could have had the same scene without a guy having his genitals mutilated. Just have them all get Out of the pool on time.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 08:52 PM
1

lol come on. No matter how accurate this is, it’s not even remotely close or clever from a o play on words standpoint. It’s like saying “WokeDonalds” or “WokeGet”
/r/MensRights10/12/22 08:51 PM
2

Eh. Wednesday had some problems with it, with my personal favorite being in the first 5 minutes she has piranhas eat a guys testicle (singular) and they never call it out as genital mutilation but instead use euphemisms. But besides those moments (which one again are awful) I think it wasn’t that bad from the woke feminist standpoint.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 08:50 PM
2

No worries. I seriously do not know or else I would have tried to politely correct you.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 08:24 PM
2

I couldn’t even get through this. This is absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 08:23 PM
2

Plain stupid? Plane stupid? Now I don’t know.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 07:29 PM
2

Plus, “you can’t vote on this issue. It’s whites only” Race, age, sex, sexuality, etc. everyone gets a say.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:32 PM
6

lol. Troll or fool? I’ll never know.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:23 PM
4

On tonight’s episode of “Troll. OR. Simp!”
/r/MensRights31/08/22 02:22 AM
1

Alright simp.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 04:29 PM
1

Lol. Alright my guy
/r/MensRights29/08/22 04:04 PM
1

Lol. Okay. You said if the are sensitive they are not worth having. You also made it sound like they are sensitive if they don’t agree with the fuck all women from the above comment. So, I’m not talking about MGTOW. I’m talking about your last comments.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 02:53 PM
1

lol. Now let’s kick out some men to because they don’t like sweeping generalizations. 👏👏👏
/r/MensRights29/08/22 02:47 PM
2

I didn’t want to watch it but my wife did and I was pleasantly surprised. I’m not sure it will be a hit but I’m definitely looking forward to next episode.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 02:05 PM
8

I enjoyed the first episode and I didn’t really get the “MAN = BAD!” and I read this link and I think it’s REALLY stretching for some of those reasons. But hey, that’s just me.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:18 AM
-3

Lol. Alright man. I’m not “tone policing” I said “they have it easier in some ways but not others”. I didn’t disagree with the “more privileged in the job market”. I’m not trying to shut down his point. And then, you’re awesome response is “women have it way easier in every way”. And that just really isn’t true. And am that’s all I said.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 05:39 PM
-5

Believe me, I get it, I understand the frustration. I deal with it myself. But can we PLEASE not make this into a “who has it worse” pissing content. As a man, some things are worse and some are better. As a woman, some things are worse, some things are better. Sometimes it’s just small things. Sometimes it’s extremely unfair and fucking terrible things. But we really should try to fix the bullshit without going THEY ARE THE ENEMY. WOMEN HAVE LIFE SO EASY!
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:22 PM
6

Yeah, so rape by coercion is a thing “I’m going to kill your dad if you don’t have sex with me” kind of thing. And pressuring someone into sex is a thing. Even if they don’t REALLLLLY want to they might say yes just to shut someone up or make them happy or whatever else. BUT THESE TWO THINGS ARE NOT THE SAME.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:52 AM
9

My daughter just turned 1. I definitely remember the wife and I being sleep deprived and just dying of exhaustion. Sometimes we were rude or jerks to each other. Sometimes one of us just had to take the hit and stay awake even though they are exhausted because the other one needs sleep. We never would do anything like what you are describing. I know sleep deprivation is terrible but it sounds like there are other problems as well.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:36 PM
1

Well yeah…but also you can not be those things.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 06:25 PM
1

Life changes, I change. When I was younger I was 100% fine being single for long stretches of time because I had tons of friends and such. As I got older two things changed, my personal enjoyment in the single life wasn’t as high and my friends started getting busy, moving farther away, etc. I know that not everybody is this way but while financially I struggle more, that’s only because we had children. Before children we made the same amount of money and were able to live a well-off lifestyle. …
/r/MensRights29/12/21 04:50 PM
6

That’s because most happy couples don’t post on social media. This is not a 100% rule of course, there are some happy couples that post a lot, but in my experience the ones that post a lot and try to look good are the ones that are the most unsteady.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 04:44 PM
3

Depends on the man indeed. I personally have always gotten lonely when out of a relationship for six months. It’s not just the sex, it’s the connection.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 04:43 PM
3

That’s fair enough. But…if on the flip side you see your spouse or friend or relative doing something really wrong, do you say something? Somebody is messing up dinner, or doing something stupid that will cause something to break, etc.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 01:56 AM
9

I don’t think your spouse giving you advice on something counts as “woman splaining”. Yes I know you didn’t ask for it. But damn man. Do you never see your wife doing something and know a better way to do it?
/r/MensRights16/12/21 05:56 PM
1

I’ve had that happen too, but if you are referring to the same type of situation I am then it’s totally different. If I put on some jeans and a t shirt and my wife says “hey, this is not a t shirt event you should change into a polo” that is her telling me what to wear but it’s more of correcting based on the situation not her forcing me what to wear. Now if she says something like “you aren’t allowed to wear cargo shorts. Get rid of all of them” then that’s the same thing.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 02:17 AM
2

Yeah obviously people can have preferences. But would you date a woman that says “don’t wear jeans or use hair product . I don’t like that” ? That’s not just “I have a preference. “ that’s trying to control. That amount of dictating someone else’s personal ensemble is not good.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 01:00 AM
3

Yeah. The apologies and begging comment is hilarious to me.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 08:16 PM
3

Eh, that’s kind of a weird thing to demand. I am sure I will get downvotes but a lot do you guys are being just as bad as the women you are complaining about. People obviously are allowed to have preferences but “don’t wear heels or makeup or else I’m sending you home” is a weird “my way or the highway” red flag. You can say “I don’t like heels or makeup” and you don’t have to like that the person wears them. and yes it’s a work function and I’m unsure about the function itself but heels and mak…
/r/MensRights25/11/21 08:15 PM
14

Hey U/purpleligjtofred I need to have a private word with you on my office about your math skills.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:32 PM
-5

This joke stopped being funny about 15 years ago
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:33 PM
1

Guys can we not post this exact same one every time.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 03:16 AM
2

No?
/r/MensRights16/10/21 07:38 AM
1

Just because you choose to do something doesn’t mean it’s not hard, lol. Have you never complained about a job or an activity or a hard house work project or anything?
/r/MensRights13/10/21 10:04 PM
3

Hey, not sure if auto correct for you but if you’re telling a short story about a real person it is anecdote not antidote (which is a cure or fix)
/r/MensRights21/09/21 12:59 PM
3

Right. And I'm saying there is a difference. I'm not saying that "oh I had a few drinks so I was raped". If you have a few drinks and sleep with someone that you wouldn't have sober that's not rape. I'm just saying there ARE situations where bad people do wait to prey on people that drink too much and that is different than the first example.
/r/MensRights06/11/20 03:30 AM
4

I used to agree with that but it's a little more complicated than that. If there is a creep (man or woman) who just waits for someone to drink too much and then takes them home that is not the same as the "drinking and driving" thing. That's like waiting in your car outside a bar, waiting for a drunk person to start driving, and then rear ending them and saying "it's their fault. They were drinking".
/r/MensRights05/11/20 09:53 PM
24

I changed it to "happy spouse happy house". I think it's definitely a good thing to try and make your spouse happy. But I expect both spouses to follow that rule.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 11:05 PM
69

Did she get suspended? Most schools (where I am) have a ridiculous zero tolerance policy so both people get in trouble.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 07:20 PM
2

I know other countries besides United States have lower standards for fire fighting.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 04:38 AM
3

If your quote is accurate it doesn't say single father of single parents. It says single mothers. So the same bullshit female only bonus applies.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 04:36 AM
1

Also this is condemning music and video games "just because". It has some good points but it definitely has some problems with the conclusions and evidence.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:38 PM
1

Plus the flip side is where is the cut off? A 5'1 person could think a 5'10 person is a giant. Or even a 5'6 person. If there was some societal system to the entire height method to try and make things more fair then that would be one thing. But there isn't. The people that are tall have different pros and cons than people that are short. It's just a fact.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 07:01 PM
0

This may be an unpopular opinion but I DEFINITELY think it's important to consider your partners financial status. You may be okay that the person wants to be a stay at home partner or a breadwinner or anything in between. Money is the first or second thing that everyone fights over.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 04:06 PM
8

If you read the reviews one of them Says something about “I identify as a woman but they said I looked like a man and charged me more”
/r/MensRights22/04/19 12:49 PM
19

I believe they are trying to sell a fake weight loss thing.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:59 PM
21

You’re forgetting the part where she admits to having sex with a guy that was so drunk she had to “keep putting it back on” and she admits that he didn’t know what’s going on
/r/MensRights28/03/19 07:52 PM
1

Wait, it came out already?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 12:21 AM
3

Take a breath. Good luck in life, my dude.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:48 AM
34

I’m not going to click this at work but holy hell are you serious?!
/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:26 PM
4

Yes, I guess that doesn’t matter though. If I go beat the shit out of a 25 year ripped man (which I can’t do) versus beating the shit out of a 25 year old skinny guy (which I also can’t do) then it doesn’t matter. I still beat the shit out of someone. Same thing if I beat up a guy who gets into fights all the time versus a guy who doesn’t. The law isn’t going to take a look at the backstory of all of these people and then pass judgement based on that. Same thing here. “ Oh, well I feel most men …
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:07 PM
4

Why should a guy be punished worse for the exact same thin g? It’s not like this woman is stronger or more aggressive or whatever than the men on the team. She is rubbing up and grabbing them in a sexually manner against their will, but it has nothing to do with strength or aggression. So why should a man get charged more for the exact same thing?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 10:54 PM
1

Yea, screw that. Investigate away.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 10:38 PM
2

I confess, I’m not paying as close attention to this as I should, but hasn’t there only been verbal testimony? I know that a court of law will believe testimony, that not every conviction occurs without other proof, but so far I think it’s just been ‘oh, this happened’ without anything else. People always bring up the ‘why did you wait so long to accuse’ argument but I get that also. Some people in these types of cases may have not wanted to say anything because of the media circus but decided t…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:55 PM
1

I think the problem is people suspect it is a false accusation for political reasons. Using your job example: if every single person that applied for your company had a sexual assault accusation come up you would think that someone is screwing with you. I’m not saying it is the exact same, I know it’s a different example, but my point is he, in theory, should still be a candidate for the job. If it is proven to be a false accusation then he should not be penalized for someone else lying. If the …
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:26 PM
2

Plus I “mansplain” to everyone. I’m not sexist I’m just a condescending dick in general 🙁
/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:21 PM
1

If I recall correctly all of this is statistic driven, even down to a red car having higher rates than a Not red car. Same with age. Same with where you live. Just like health insurance. Take two candidates that are exactly the same except for gender and the female candidate will cost more. It’s a business using statistics.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 04:17 PM
1

Ah, yea. That’s all true. Some people just don’t put in the work or effort or realize it’s not always perfect, I guess.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 04:02 PM
1

Even if both parties work for a living there is a lot of potentially weird ways that partners split finances. Not everything is “all expenses are 50 50 all the time” some do big purchases, some do small. Some pay rent where the other partner does utilities, groceries, gas, etc.” Some people safe for retirement or pay for insurance while the other doesn’t (since partner A’s company plan might be better and it gets automatically removed from their paycheck). It is very hard to say “I have my accou…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:39 PM
1

It’s easy to say “there should be clear cut rules, except for weird one-offs” but that’s the problem. There are a million different shades of weird one-off situations. If somebody is leaving a partner due to abuse, or cheating, or stealing, or drugs, or just plain arguing all the time. There are situations where one partner “did everything right” but the other partner just wants out and will make life a living hell until a divorce is agreed upon. In those cases the partner that tried should not …
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:37 PM
-1

Keep the updates coming g cuz.
/r/seduction03/08/18 01:44 AM
7

Don't small kids eat antifreeze if left out because it's brightly colored and tastes sweet?
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:43 PM
7

I believe It's a comment on how some people may not be happy or satisfied in a relationship but always trying to 'upgrade' and that always on the search mentality is not hearing for a relationship so why would a man get married in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 05:10 AM
6

If you are not being sarcastic, do you mind explaining why?
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:56 PM
2

Not female superiority, just the fact that they exist. And that they are allowed to fly on planes. Like other people said, if this was anything race or religion related it would not fly at all (In the US). You can't say "I don't like Christians, all Christians go away." or "I don't like kids, no kid is allowed to sit next to me". Now, sometimes I wish we could make those kind of rules, but that's not how it works. The kid has a right to be on a plane, a Christian has a right to be on a plane, an…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 01:24 AM
2

It's all good and well to respect other people's beliefs, but we cannot enforce them at the cost of other people's rights. Vegans are a great example. If you believe eating meat is wrong for moral reasons than good for you, don't eat meat, and I will not force you to eat meat. You do not have to go eat at a steakhouse, you do not have to kill and butcher a cow, but you cannot stop someone else from doing that either. This is the same thing. If you believe that you should not talk/interact with a…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 11:56 PM
1

He drinks lots of milk bra, he's go this.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 11:36 PM
1

I see your point, but, there are usually requests to stop/me walking away (not entirely from the environment, just from the person tickling me), then more verbal warnings, then me saying seriously please stop or we will have a problem. People usually stop since I'm not a 7 year old child.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 12:46 PM
1

As long as you do not abuse the power of the tickle. I really, REALLY dislike being tickled, which I have made known. Nobody tickles me, which I prefer. Do not abuse! -Someone who really dislikes being tickled
/r/MensRights11/09/16 09:50 PM
1

!RemindMe 72 hour "Interesting indeed"
/r/MensRights01/09/16 04:36 PM
1

Maybe you are just trying to make a joke that I'm not understanding, but you are taking quotes from the article and "translating" them into your own words, which is fine, except you are wrong. I guess you could claim it is a difference of opinion, but if someone says "I think you are cool, let's hang out more" and your Translation is: "let's never talk again" you can say that is an opinion. But it is a very inaccurate translation that is wrong. As is the case here. As for tone trolling, while I …
/r/MensRights29/08/16 03:21 PM
0

So, all of your comments are pretty wrong. ...the City of London is fantastic for women - because it has 155 single men per 100 ladies. Translation: 3 single men for every 2 single women, so if I don't hit it off (meaning mutual attraction) with one guy, there is another chance out there. These numbers seems favourable - until you realise that you’re dealing with the most placid of creatures, many of whom seem to delight in their solo status. Translation: well, I thought I had another chance but…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 05:29 PM
3

Yea...what the hell. u/opinionatedshmuck does not mention his/her gender, or any genders concerning false accusers/actual rapists. Take a breath.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:31 AM
2

tumbrel TIL (link for the lazy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumbrel )
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:50 PM
5

I agree, but at the same time you have to admit that there is a difference between equal opportunity and equal results. A lot of the statistics that people throw around "X many more men CEOs than women CEOs." etc. are used in such a way as to say "oh look, there are less women CEOs then men CEOs, obviously it is not equal opportunity for women". Now it will be very difficult to prove that there is absolutely 100% equal opportunity or no bias, but at the same time the differences in percentages o…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:41 PM
2

That's how it sounds to me.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 05:44 PM
4

Well, let's put aside the fact that there is a large number of important and necessary positions besides infantry that your daughter could do. I am a mid 20's male. I am stronger than some and weaker than others. I know some men that "are far more equipped to survive" than me. Can I use that to get out of the draft? Follow-Up Question: If your daughter is in better shape than me and more equipped physically to survive should she be drafted over me?
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:59 PM
8

I read the comments in the article and heard the term "Lifeboat feminist" for the first time. I'm going to be using in it in the future.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:51 PM
1

I am reading the linked article about the Rolling Stone story and this line stood out to me "The article focused on a student identified only as "Jackie," who said she was raped by seven men at a fraternity house. Jackie refused to cooperate in the police investigation." It seems interesting that she reported the crime (alleged) then refused to cooperate with the investigation.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 10:07 PM
9

You are just mad because you buy deepfriedcocaine from Tyrone!
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:45 PM
1

I'm sorry if my original comment was unclear, I was hoping that both people would cite their sources so I could review them. I was not asking for only one side's sources.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:45 PM
1

I have heard both statistics many times, (the 1 in 5, and the refute) but I have not read up on either one, so I wanted to know what your source is. So thanks. But for the record it is not conducive to learning/discussion to say that kind of thing when a person asks for information.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:03 PM
-2

Sources for both please?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:29 AM
3

Please reply to this. I am a neutral 3rd party who is interested.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:31 PM
8

Your username just makes it better.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:26 PM
2

I love this one. ESPECIALLY when I'm hitting on them
/r/seduction05/10/11 03:11 AM
2

And then you go "No no no, I meant your last name"
/r/seduction05/10/11 03:09 AM
2

Please tell me the depth joke was on purpose
/r/MensRights03/10/11 09:51 AM
1

I think it couldn't.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 09:50 AM
1

Hey leave GoT out of this!
/r/seduction23/06/11 03:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter