TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Nyeep Archive

View 4 posts and 93 comments by Nyeep on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I have yet to see a man who needs to shit at events that are at most, a few hours long. And if they have something like crohn's, I'm sure that nobody is actually stopping them from using the women's...
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:42 AM
-1

Yeah, but a guy doesn't have to sit down on the seat that is covered in it, does he?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:01 PM
-3

A sit down seat that isn't covered in piss.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:00 PM
-2

That's a stupid analogy. Men and women have different parts. Whites and balcks don't.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:30 PM
-4

Because there is usually piss all over them.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:28 PM
-2

But the thing is, this is perfectly acceptable and explainable. Women have to sit to pee. Men do not. If you can't hold a poo for a few hours, then you either need to go to your GP or don't go to the event.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:39 PM
-8

It's petty shit like this on the front page that is making me unsub from you r/mensrights. You used to be good, and insightful. But now, you're almost as bad as r/atheism. Let those words sink in.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:48 AM
2

Your point being? You still can't apply one culture's morals to anothers.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:47 PM
2

But that's the thing - it's not in the US. You can't apply one culture's morals to another.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:19 PM
4

But none of those reasons are mens rights issues - they're basically 'girls smell' reasons.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:19 PM
6

...so how on EARTH is this a mens rights issue?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:02 AM
5

I was referring to the title, but I guess sensationalised is the wrong word.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:58 PM
3

Exactly, the story's been sensationalised over here about nothing...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:27 PM
19

Wait, what's the problem here? I don't understand...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:23 PM
1

Criminal charges weren't pressed, but I think she was removed from the teachers register for it.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:19 PM
11

But it's not illegal, just highly unethical - the appropriate actions were taken.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:17 PM
8

Please research ages of consent before you go sensationalising stuff again. What should have happened, happened.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:15 PM
7

When all rational arguments fail, result to insulting somebodies grammar.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:04 PM
-1

...no, a 30 year old woman and a 45 year old woman are also not ok. Going back to your earlier point, the song britney sang as a 17 year old was also written and originally sung as a 17 year old. Now, I don't know exactly, but it's likely that the song the 50 year old sang was written and originally sung recently.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 06:11 PM
-5

Age is not irrelevant when it's a 50 year old singing to a 16 year old. There's a line. Regardless, we should wait until a video of his performance is released to judge anything about this.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:28 PM
0

And yet we're making assumptions when we don't have all the evidence. Good going.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:08 PM
0

The difference is, she was 17 when she was doing that stuff. This is a 50 year old. Singing a sexually charged song to a 16 year old. God damn it r/mensrights, I side with you so often, but this time...you're just being stupid.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:05 PM
-30

Actually, child abductors often take the children places as if they were their own children, so..yeah, this oculd be what a child abductor would do.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:28 PM
2

it's never a good thing to do FTFY
/r/MensRights04/09/12 09:01 AM
1

did you not read the story? It's not an isolated incident.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:52 AM
2

This is why I hate reddit sometimes.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:27 PM
1

Well. I guess we can't do anything about that.. I just hope that the people phoning her realise what a horrible thing they're doing.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:02 PM
3

Maybe not the situation, but I think my major point still stands. When reddit gets hold of a 'bad guy's' phone number, awful things happen.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 10:59 PM
6

Maybe. But witch hunts are still a horrible, horrible thing to do. Vigilante justice is not good.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 10:49 PM
4

Well it turned out that boomajinks made a load of stuff up in order to get more money, and it was actually the haulage company that caused the damage - I think (don't take my word) that boomerjinks was aware that it was the haulage company. Also, he vastly exagerates most of his story.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 09:17 PM
89

http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/mbydq/i_let_telltale_borrow_my_jurassic_park_jeep_and/ Basically, a guy lent his JP jeep to telltale games for a game promo, and he recieved it back with a scratch - he pinned it on one specific person, and released her details/phone number. Reddit picked up their pitchforks without a moments notice, and she then got inundated with calls, including death and rape threats. It then turned out that she was innocent, and had nothing to do the jeep getting scra…
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:06 PM
55

No, it's a dick move, we don't know the full story (even though it's likely that this is what happened). I mean, this could end up like the whole jurrassic park jeep fiasco. It probably wouldn't, but lets just not get people involved personally just in case, yeah?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:04 PM
5

"Gather round, everyone..." "Not you, sports calender!"
/r/MensRights02/09/12 03:55 PM
6

then she should get a job.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 08:14 AM
4

It's not bullshit, it's a very basic theory in psychology based around something you might have heard of called 'schemas'. A schema is a preformed idea that you have about something. When you encode information into your memory, schemas are applied to it, changing your memory to fit the schemas.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 10:03 AM
9

I disagree partially. First wave feminism was fantastic - women being able to vote by themselves was a good thing. Second wave was...borderline between gaining equal rights and putting themselves on top. I'm just gonna go ahead and disregard third wave as it is in no way even trying to be egalitarianism like some feminists believe it is.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:51 AM
1

Yes, because people who go to /r/feminism never visit any other subreddits. Ever.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:00 AM
4

Yay for sourced data!
/r/MensRights19/05/12 11:32 PM
3

Nope, the man is actually being very assertive about it.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:58 AM
3

I doubt it will. What's even better is that he said the line 'Just because you're a woman, it doesn't make this ok.'
/r/MensRights04/05/12 11:26 PM
3

It depends on the colour of the toilet seat. I have a wooden one. Sometimes, it is very difficult to see those tiny drops of piss when you are standing up, made more difficult when you are groggy in the morning.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:33 PM
5

People still believe the 30% pay gap bullshit? My god.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:16 PM
1

Not really. Noses enhance your experience of the world. Foreskins enhance your experience of sex.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 11:06 PM
4

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 10:52 PM
0

I would say that it's unnecessary, but only in the same way that a nose is unnecessary.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 10:09 PM
5

Fair enough...I guess my TL;DR reflex kicked in :/
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:13 PM
-1

Just wondering, but what is the point of this bot?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:28 PM
1

Go tell that to the feminists in /srs.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:02 AM
3

There is also a large table of statistics on page 42.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 09:49 PM
1

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:47 AM
2

Besides from eating hundreds of nuts/seeds, or artificially extracting vegetable proteins, it kinda is.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:37 AM
1

Care to answer that question? I already said that my source was common sense if you even know a little about the nutrients that your body needs to survive.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:35 AM
2

Care to tell me what the main nutrient of meat is?
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:14 AM
7

Common sense. If you don't have a good source of protein (not counting supplements, because you can also get supplements for the nutrition you gain from plants), then your body will grow poorly, and muscle mass will start to waste away.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:05 AM
7

Common sense. If you don't have a good source of protein (not counting supplements, because you can also get supplements for the nutrition you gain from plants), then your body will grow poorly, and muscle mass will start to waste away.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:05 AM
10

Yes, but those with very little meat in their diets also suffer badly.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 08:21 AM
2

Oh, I hate those shows because it it obvious child abuse. But these girls are generally put in the same position as boys. No uproar. Just drunk laughing.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 07:42 AM
2

Actually, on You've been framed (the English version), I've seen plenty of times when the parent has laughed at his/her daughter.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 07:37 AM
2

wait, what? Dude, I'm an MRA too. All that I was saying was that it wasn't really needed to mention the gender of the teacher because it's irrelevant.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 06:53 AM
3

I am in no way defending this woman, as she is obviously sick in the mind - but this was nothing to do with gender. Some people are simply just sadistic. Also, when she said 'you're a big boy', she may have meant that he was too physically large for her to carry him. Just trying to offer another perspective.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 06:17 PM
1

A grown man been taken under restraint by 3 girls Here is my problem - what if there was only one guard in the area? A single guard needs to be able to restrain a prisoner on their own, which is why quotas should be thrown out of the window and skill exams should be put in place instead.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 12:14 PM
7

You're also generalising in that first sentence.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 11:42 AM
6

Care to elaborate on why you think that they're lies?
/r/MensRights23/12/11 12:39 AM
6

shows mybadgamertag the door
/r/MensRights20/12/11 12:24 PM
1

I know, I wasn't too sure about it myself, I don't really have much experience with e-mails like this - but hey, there's no time like the present.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 08:36 AM
2

The e-mail: Dear Mrs. Riddle, I would like to address the underlying misandry in your model. Throughout your site, you see the phrase 'help men change' several times. This offends me horribly, as it implies, no, downright rejects the idea that women can do no harm in a relationship. Pardon my language for loss of a better word, but that is complete and utter bullshit. I have seen many, many cases of DA that have the female in the relationship as the perpetrator, rather than the man. No, it is no…
/r/MensRights15/12/11 08:07 AM
17

Writing an email to the executive director to ask why they are so misandristic. Doubt she'll reply, but you never know.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 08:37 PM
3

Name one that isn't an ad raising awareness for abuse.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 06:48 PM
1

I can't tell whether you're being sarcastic or not. If you're not, I disagree with your view entirely.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 09:28 PM
1

Again, you have not provided a source of information for this statement. Also, you cannot take into account unreported cases. That is why statistics for many crimes will never be 100% accurate.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 03:01 PM
1

I wasn't asking for a source for my benefit, I was giving you a chance to prove your statements. And of course unreported abuse happens, but can you not see why it would be much more common for men? Think of the social segregation that would occur if a man was to admit that he was beaten up by a girl? People would see him as weak. This is why awareness needs to be raised about all kinds of DV, not just male on female.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 02:55 PM
1

Not a good source, it contains no citations for those statistics. Also, those statistics are from Canada only. Try again.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 02:39 PM
2

I asked for a source, not a quote.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 01:59 PM
4

I've posted this before aswell, the ASA can do nothing about discrimination issues, that's another authority. http://www.asa.org.uk/Regulation-Explained/What-we-cover/Complaints-outside-remit.aspx http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/
/r/MensRights24/10/11 12:33 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights24/10/11 10:14 AM
1

In England, a tart is basically someone who dresses very provocatively.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 10:12 AM
1

But that's the thing - not many people will look deeper into the website, most will just see the adverts and assume all men are abusers.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 10:07 AM
6

I have to say, You have a very admirable attitude about all of this. You seem to have handled the situation well.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:11 PM
11

That must have been horrible for you... Did you manage to get out of it in the end?
/r/MensRights23/10/11 09:38 PM
7

No you can't - They can do diddly squat about equality issues.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 07:07 PM
75

It's not an anti domestic violence campaign. It's an anti-men campaign.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 03:58 PM
4

http://imgur.com/a/6df4G It's even present in these campaign posters - In the female posters, the men are the beaters, and in the male posters, the men are the beaters. This is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 03:06 PM
1

Discrimination isn't as broad as you describe it - it is simply treating somebody differently (preventing them from doing something) because they belong to a different social category from you - e.g. not hiring somebody because they are a man/woman, avoiding talking to someone because they are old/young, etc. Other than that, you make some excellent points.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 10:25 PM
2

I don't understand, I removed the offending post, why are you still angry? ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights21/10/11 09:44 PM
0

You're taking the first comment out of context. He meant that they have their views controlled by the feminazis, and it's not only children that this can happen to. Also, an analogy is not a comparison.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 03:16 PM
2

You've been here for 1 year and 4 months, and you can't tell what sexism is and isn't. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:17 AM
8

Try to raise awareness of the issues. Run campaigns. But make sure that you use proper, cited data from un-bias sources. Once people become aware of another side of the argument, they can start making up their own minds rather than having their views guided by the feminazis.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 10:35 PM
1

TIL.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:12 PM
2

A jail is used to hold someone awaiting a trial, and a prison is used for someone who has been sentenced.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 09:46 PM
1

If she wanted to, she could have let him call the police and face what she had done. But, she chose to perform oral sex on him. Whether or not she was under duress, she had the option to do the decent thing. In my opinion, if she had not committed the crime, but he threatened her with calling the police about a crime she hadn't committed unless she performed oral sex, that would be blackmail. In my opinion, what he did was wrong, but it was not blackmail. Again, in my opinion, he should have jus…
/r/MensRights04/09/11 07:47 PM
0

He didn't force her into it, he gave her an option.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 07:06 PM
2

He didn't force her to though, she could have just as easily given up and let him call the police.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 07:05 PM
3

Use your bran
/r/MensRights25/08/11 08:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter