TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OctaviaPinfold Archive

View 5 posts and 926 comments by OctaviaPinfold on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The husband is Marshal and the wife is Fort Lauderdale? What kind of abbreviations are they using?
/r/PussyPass19/02/23 01:24 PM
15

Yeah, not to mention wills get attacked all the time and courts overrule them all the time, you have to have a really weak claim to not get anything.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:38 PM
6

A political force is pushing the good ol' divide and conquer strategy and the sheep gobble it all up. If women in the safest time in history and the safest world are afraid to go outside because men, that's not an indication of danger, that's an indication of successful fear mongering and conspiracy theories. I have a higher chance for somebody to break into my apartment or to get robbed, beaten, stabbed on the streets but if I ever went "I'm afraid," everybody would tell me I'm stupid because 1…
/r/MensRights16/02/23 10:18 AM
1

Depends on where you live. Where I grew up, there were plenty of men without any status or good looks having children and wives. Mind you the wives didn't have any status or looks, either, but that's average people for you. The correlation I noticed is that the internet became part of more and more people's lives, social media and dating apps took off and the new generations' success in relationships started declining. I'm pretty sure it skews the perception of people so bad they expect immediat…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:30 PM
3

"You are a child" exactly, it's fucked up that a teacher knows it but doesn't understand it at the same time. They're children behaving like children, and that's an angry, maybe middle aged woman who feels strong "confronting" a boy for being a child and misconstruing a very common thing between any two kids as a fucking hate crime. From this, if this keeps getting re-enforced, the boy will draw the conclusion that he can't count on authority figures and the girl the conclusion that she can get …
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:11 PM
5

This. You can't even go out to a bar on the weekend and try flirting because "why can't women just go out and enjoy some time without men approaching them." Everything that used to be normal and frankly is normal is out of the question according to a growing number of people, meanwhile everybody complains there's too many people who chose to be single and there's not even enough children getting born to continue society. It's not men who still try that are in the wrong, it's women who expect men…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:49 PM
7

Definitely not inappropriate. There's nothing wrong with flirting, not even at a work event. Work used to be one of the most common environments people met their SOs, in places not this heavily infected by woke/feminist bullshit it still is.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:44 PM
2

That still doesn't mean the person who does try flirting is in the wrong. Work used to be one of the most common environments where people met their SO, in countries not this heavily infected by feminist/woke propaganda it still is. Not to mention a work event usually isn't even the workplace during working hours.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:33 PM
5

Every "color" people had their own version of slavery and genocide, it's something humans did and justified by arbitrary rules (most of the time it had nothing to do with what people call race today), it's not something one specific group (and all its members) of arbitrary characteristics is responsible for. Holding the belief that one group and its members are inherently worse than another because they fall into different made up categories they call race is racism.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:19 PM
2

Additionally to the double standards, women who ever argue to withhold sex immediately show they're not relationship material. Sex isn't some reward or transaction you give in exchange for something, that's called prostitution, not relationship. In a healthy relationship sex happens because both parties want it and neither expects anything in return.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:42 PM
8

In exchange there's a real risk of being in constant pain after it. And it doesn't matter if it's 1% or 15%, those percenteges are COMMON and VERY COMMON in medicine.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:38 PM
5

I mean, that 19-year-old certainly does benefit from that relationship. If she plays her cards right, she never has to work a single day in her life if she doesn't want to.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 05:09 PM
-1

I think it's very easy for people to fall into the trap of generalization. Ideally of course if people talked about it, others would empathize but point out how it's a generalization, and while they understand, it is important to know the difference and also know that in many cases people may disproportionately encounter bad actors and it really skews perceptions. Understanding that is key, but it's not a given if your world view is skewed, people aren't born with knowledge and wisdom. The probl…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:40 AM
3

If you're a man and you think everybody's looking at you, talking about you, laughing about your height/weight/hair/whatever, you're told you're just imagining it, people are just minding their own business and it's all in your head. When you're a woman and you think everybody's looking at you, talking about you, undressing you in their minds, you're told you're definitely right, all men are doing this and you should be very, very afraid because you being raped and murdered by anybody, even peop…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 10:15 AM
1

She definitely wasn't behaving normally if she was on that many medications as the article says. What is more likely that her environment ignored it and trusted her more than it should. I also don't really like all this postpartum thing. A million things can trigger schizophrenia but it's always genetic, not even just a single gene but many, you have to have the right genetic makeup to have a high enough chance to develop it but somehow people misconstrue this as caused by giving birth instead o…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:56 AM
5

As somebody who was used in high school for entertainment by girls who almost instinctively played on my personality disorders I knew nothing of and nobody else cared about, plus living at home with a mother who emotionally abused and often beat my father, and briefly ending up hating the entire gender at the age of 16 when everything was hurting unless I got really drunk, alone, on the weekend, I can say that boy was in the wrong for existing. That's how I feel even at 34, despite letting that …
/r/MensRights08/02/23 03:55 PM
1

App? I feel old now.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 03:16 PM
1

So, the result is the same, but now they cannot say you are wrong or missoginist. Of course they can, every time somebody argues that young women have agency to decide what they want, the wokes come with the "she was groomed" argument and now you're facing not just the statement about pedophilia that doesn't fucking make sense to begin towards adult women but also a statement that other men forced that woman into that situation.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 03:02 PM
44

If anybody wrote a public article judging short haired women like this, they'd be cancelled so fast servers would overload all over the place.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 07:19 PM
26

Do you think a woman who'd sue a men's barber cared about any justification? Not to mention a court could rule signing the lease itself was an act of discrimination, so there's that.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 07:41 AM
1

Indeed, if it's women, it's sex positivity, if it's men, it's unsolicited comments at best but probably harassment.
/r/PussyPass02/02/23 08:45 PM
3

That comment is a typical red herring, "here's something random and unrelated (in this case also oversimplified and misrepresented to look like it's somehow related), unless you magically and personally come up with a solution to that, you can't talk about all the evil shit I'm doing." There's no point in trying to argue with it, you can't defeat fallacies as they're the lack of logic in an argument.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:26 AM
12

So if I'm understanding this right, she used the good ol' "I'm entitled to that position even if others are equally or more qualified because I'm a woman" argument and was willing to grasp at whatever straw she could find. Glad to hear it didn't work for once... although it still has a huge, years long toll on the entire system.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 12:21 PM
6

Honestly, in a matter of years there's gonna be thousands of AI-driven services that make the entirety of Wikipedia obsolete (especially with how most of it is just random trivia anyway that's not useful for any purpose except for trivia games). Most won't be better bias-wise but at least there are going to be equivalent alternatives.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:41 AM
2

People who say maliciously false shit like suicide is committed by the weak don't understand at least two things: what suicide is and what weak is.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 08:53 AM
11

I'm pretty sure if we wanted to, we could find cases of female nurses abusing, raping male patients, even ones with locked-in syndrome who were thought to be in a coma only to be discovered later that they were in fact conscious and with the right computerized equipment talk about what shit they were put through over and over, and people, hospitals covered it up. But I digress, positions of power attract abusive people but it doesn't mean you suddenly have to be afraid of everybody in those posi…
/r/MensRights20/01/23 09:34 PM
75

Apparently you can even be in a different country for half the time you're accused and they still won't even consider women may not be telling the truth https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10e1nn2/uk_exmilitary_cop_speaks_out_over_a_false/
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:47 PM
8

So it's basically like the Oscars, rich people paying off each other, they're just not THAT rich.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 12:46 PM
22

And most of those are gang related, many happens in pubs or bars, far from all have something to do with random people on the street. People have a really hard time recognizing most people live in fairly safe environments because "this night in this place nothing has happened for the 974th night in a row" is not newsworthy
/r/MensRights15/01/23 09:33 PM
6

he was just another little pig of a man who didn’t matter more than what I wanted to get done that day, just like all the other little pigs of men who pull this shit. Well, we'll never know what happened but from this remark and her general attitude in my opinion this IS the kind of person who would misconstrue anything a man says and does. It's hardly believable this happens with any frequency unless she literally has "Touch here, yes, you" tattooed on her back.
/r/MensRights14/01/23 12:46 AM
2

Getting accurate information out of china is very difficult. So you have to take any statements about numbers and scale with a pile of salt. That is the problem with China, they lied so much, censored their history so much and brainwashed their own people so much we'll never know what the fuck happened before recent times, and know only little from today's era. Add the potential of anti-Chinese propaganda also skewing things into the mix and trusting a handful of people to accurately describe wh…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 08:00 PM
1

Echo chambers are great for spreading disinformation and TikTok is probably better in creating echo chambers than any other platform out there.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 07:40 PM
2

No idea who it is, but guilt by association is a common logical fallacy people use when they want to target somebody without anything against them, so I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case here, too.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 03:37 PM
6

The Hungarian government incentivizes people to have children and grow a reliance on the government itself for several years now, this is just one among many of their shit. The government doesn't hate men and are certainly not feminist, they just couldn't give a fuck about anybody but themselves. If you're building your own dynasty, you want poor and uneducated people reliant on your dynasty to keep it in power. That's what they're doing with all the stupid "family friendly" decisions. Instead o…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 01:41 PM
3

I'm sure they worked really hard on that research. Especially on the cherry picking part.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 09:06 PM
2

The problem is, extremes birth extremes, stupid shit by the "left" is met with nationalism and straight up fascism, not to mention racism and all the anti-LGBTQ sentiment people can come up with. Look at Hungary, the government in their propaganda uses, among other things, the results of the hatred towards anything male or white to hate everything that doesn't fit into their view of a society so traditional it's fictitious. They link specific extreme ideologies to the entire "west" and everybody…
/r/MensRights08/01/23 10:24 PM
13

The internet and several people offline too would be screaming rape and major news outlets would be showing it off as a prime example of the "rape culture" if a man admitted to randomly kissing a woman on her stomach without consent in this same context and their same profiles, especially with the justification that "I couldn't help myself," calls for "teach boys that no means no" and chants of "every man is a rapist" would fire up with full force again. Even if she said "it's okay, I liked it,"…
/r/MensRights07/01/23 04:48 PM
7

puberty blockers delay puberty, it is like being a late bloomer if you will Far from it. Puberty blockers and the resulting changes simply won't allow the body to go through puberty on its own, which in result stuns the development of kids and ends up them not being able to fully develop ever again. It's not a reversible process, you can't go through puberty in your 20s and be fine. And the reason to put a kid through these chemically induced disabilities that have been classified as torture alr…
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:36 PM
12

Also, the argument that because a boy prefers something the adults view as feminine must mean it's gender dysphoria is laughably incorrect and mindlessly stupid. There is nothing inherently masculine or feminine in the toys or clothes we have, everything is decided on the societal level and pretty much every view society has today about clothes and toys come from ads, from fucking companies who wanted to sell stuff and advertised stuff based on what they thought would sell based on contemporary …
/r/MensRights06/01/23 03:34 PM
15

A: telling your kid they're the opposite gender, dressing them up and buying them the opposite gender toys Which doesn't even make sense considering we decide what toys and clothes belong to what gender, there's nothing inherently feminine in playing with Barbies or masculine in playing with a Spider-man figurine. It even flipped a few times, when companies started to color-code toys, pink was masculine and blue was feminine. Not because it made sense but because a few people decided on it, and …
/r/MensRights06/01/23 03:19 PM
35

This pseudoscience of gender dysphoria in prepubescent children and even practically newborns is going to end up with countless suicides. It's horrifying how crazy a society can get, and even worse that you're either with them or on the other end of the spectrum, both extremes in their own way and everybody who's willing to think for a moment is ostracized from everywhere. I have a bad feeling we're even going to see "designer babies" in the very near future, shaping only the brains and hormones…
/r/MensRights06/01/23 03:05 PM
8

Try growing up in an environment where you were made to believe you're beautiful, you deserve everything, you can become whatever you want, you're going to have a loving family, you're going to be successful, and when reality hits you in the face in your late teens, you start to you struggle in school, not everybody becomes your friend, people start mocking you and there's nobody to talk to to understand it's not your fault and how to accept things and deal with bullying, that feeling of sadness…
/r/MensRights06/01/23 01:27 PM
6

Incel is the new gay/communist/unionist/blasphemer/whatever they used before that
/r/MensRights06/01/23 01:21 PM
14

No, the gist is that the two women who started and kept a mass hysteria going for their own amusement that ended in several innocent people dead should have been punished but there were no consequences for them and they lived long, normal lives instead. And women accusing others for fun and ruining the lives of the accused in the process happens today, too.
/r/PussyPass04/01/23 06:08 PM
0

Supposedly is the key word. There's always people to hate, there's always a them against an us, and very often that them is a huge, untouchable enemy with all the evil intents under the Sun and it's the cause of everything bad that has been happening. An enemy powerful enough to control the world or at least some large part of it but weak enough to be defeated without much effort by a small group or even just a single person if they have their way and get all the political power they want. Other…
/r/MensRights04/01/23 04:56 PM
12

To be honest poor behavior by women doesn't contribute to societal stability, either. You could even argue that it's worse because hormones naturally should cause men to fight and get over it, even as boys and that should make most to learn a decent control by the time they grow up, women on the other hand rarely release the pressure in any healthy way, not even as girls. Probably that's also a learned behavior but not even women want it any other way. If there's growing "disruptive" and "antiso…
/r/MensRights03/01/23 09:01 AM
12

But as an American I don't like mandatory anything.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:05 PM
25

I'm guessing you're not paying taxes, not working, not paying for anything, not obeying laws, etc, either, and you also don't want all the mandatory rights that protect your ass from people who won't want to pay for your work, want to steal from you, want to kill you, want to experiment on you, want to enslave you, etc.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 07:48 PM
2

People who argue about trust probably do things behind others' backs they shouldn't be doing. The thing is, whether you trust somebody or doesn't have no barring on what that person does or doesn't do, there's no connection. You can fully trust somebody and that somebody can still cheat on you and the reverse can also be true. Arguing about trust makes no sense, that's not how the world works, people won't not cheat because somebody trusts them, and cheating is incredibly common. Also, there's a…
/r/MensRights02/01/23 07:30 PM
6

Typical bullies going for the easy target to make themselves feel better in their insignificant lives, to give them the sense of power over somebody. It's really not true that only men can behave like that, the entire feminist empowerment narrative is built on it. In this case men are the easy target since men under normal circumstances aren't allowed socially to stand up for themselves against women, or even just disagree since the consequences can be rather severe, from mental or physical abus…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:28 PM
3

Fuck all those people. Where I live, unless you have a medical condition that necessitates it, you need to have THREE children and be over FORTY years old to get a vasectomy. It's illegal otherwise. I feel so privileged! Note: same applies for women to tie their tubes, which is also fucked up, but at least women have a lot more birth control options than what men have, i.e. a single condom. And it's fucking insane that so many believe everybody else lives in the same imaginary bubble as they are…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 08:53 PM
41

Apparently it's an official account. But at least most tweets under it called out the bullshit. Still, fuck these people. Also since 2016 the numbers I'm guessing are even worse for men.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:23 AM
6

*disinformation
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:43 PM
2

Eventually it figures out what you're trying to do and self-corrects to not tell you jokes about men, either. The only way to really gauge the bias would be to let hundreds of independent people with independent accounts from all over the globe give it the same questions at the same time. But considering we know that this was trained on online conversations, we know there is going to be negative bias towards men there. If you ask it why its responses differ, it will tell you that this is the res…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:12 PM
1

I got a result not this bad, but still pretty biased: https://imgur.com/a/EuQUJ0B For some reason it decided to append a clarification that the joke about women is just a joke, didn't have the same "courtesy" about men, though. Edit: nevermind, I reversed the order in a new session and got the same result. https://imgur.com/a/ZJCPpi3 Edit2: it caught itself the third time, and explained it rather nicely that this is how it was trained to behave. https://imgur.com/a/Yi00pGj Meaning it reflects th…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 05:51 PM
5

This happens with all "popular" mental disorders, there's people attention seeking and self-diagnosing, i.e. they intentionally confuse the everyday, normal deviation from the baseline of the human mind with an actual illness to boost their imaginary social credits online. Being a bit sad occasionally? Major depression disorder. Getting distracted sometimes? ADHD. Having different moods in different situations? Bipolar disorder. Any normal quirk that doesn't fit anywhere? Autism. It's a fucked u…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 10:54 AM
15

I'm not entirely sure how you're gonna prove intent Yeah, because women can accidentally cheat on their partners, they don't intend to, it just happens, they can't help it. What a stupid person. Also, mandating it would have the opposite effect, first, it would eradicate all the suspicion that could come up later in a relationship, not to mention it's common enough that it's a real concern. It has nothing to do with trust, it's pure statistics and no matter how much you trust somebody, that does…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 10:27 AM
23

They fearmonger because fearmongering is a proven tactic in politics to get supporters from the pool of people who respond to that and don't question the claims or even think about how illogical the arguments sound. "Look at that big scary enemy coming for you, you need this to protect US from THEM."
/r/MensRights23/12/22 09:43 AM
1

You could go with Youessaians /j
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:41 PM
3

Yeah, probably another site afraid of GDPR.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:39 PM
1

Those posters are incredibly far from a radical feminist demonstration.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 07:14 PM
4

To be frank stoicism, strength and dominance aren't inherently masculine traits, one is a philosophy, people throwing the word around probably wouldn't even be able to describe it loosely, let alone actually explain what it means, strength is viewed as positive regardless of gender, and dominance is a character trait with a very uneven distribution among men but also common among women. Virility is the only masculine trait but only because it is essentially defined as everything male, although w…
/r/MensRights18/12/22 12:29 AM
9

Obvious self regulation, there's going to be laws requiring the same thing very soon on top of what are already applicable. Although that won't make the double standards go away.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 07:44 AM
9

From my experience most people hold the stance that it doesn't matter how many innocent men end up in jail/prison as long as the probability of guilty men walking free due to lack of evidence or technicality remains low. Only when it's about women do the opinions change.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 03:38 PM
3

AI? The Antikythera mechanism is a piece of ancient computer that's stupid by today's computer standards but beats rounds to most feminists' capabilities to think.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 01:28 PM
6

Self-reporting should never be treated as hard evidence for anything, even hospitalization has to be taken with a grain of salt, for example a person who cuts themself can end up in a hospital due to an infection. Does that still count as a suicide attempt then? Some "statistics" will count it, some won't.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:31 PM
1

I have a feeling services that will develop from this will be legally required to only provide it to infertile or single women, and lesbian couples.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 12:37 PM
10

With laws like this, the message is clearly that you should be horrified.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 05:34 PM
3

Lawmakers in the UK have officially lost it. If it wasn't scary as shit and happening way too often nowadays, it would be fascinating what the legal consequences are of when a political power brainwashes a large group of people into believing there's a massive, untouchable threat looming at every corner, and in no time these people start seeing the enemy everywhere; not to mention how so many are going to abuse the vague laws for personal vendettas or just to entertain themselves, which is of co…
/r/MensRights09/12/22 05:22 PM
112

Yep, this was trained on real data by real people found all over the internet and now it includes the real biases and double standards. Until somebody hides it, they generally do that when something becomes controversial even though it reflects the views of the general population, although I doubt this will be one of them.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 04:46 PM
1

Signed off under false pretenses
/r/MensRights07/12/22 02:13 PM
28

That only applies to a judge sentencing you, not to everything before that. Nothing saves you from getting incarcerated even for years just because you're innocent; as long as you're not sentenced, you're still legally innocent even if you're in jail waiting for the trial or the verdict. The problem is everybody else who won't just not withhold judgement but won't even change their minds when they're wrong.
/r/PussyPass06/12/22 09:18 AM
11

That's called chemical castration and a lot of scientists argue it's a form of cruel and unusual punishment even for violent sex offenders that isn't even effective when accounted for all factors. Unless you have some serious cancer that specifically needs sex hormones to survive, that's the last thing you want. Does Alan Turing ring a bell? He's the most famous person who was "cleansed" for "his own good". Look where it got him.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 03:11 PM
3

Yes, but it shouldn't be the basis of the right to have paid sick leaves and days off, it should only extend the right you get by default.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 03:43 PM
7

But he didn't start it, it started with some most definitely woman bringing up the usual delusion that men are safe everywhere. And while men aren't likely to get raped in an Uber, they're just as likely (if not more) to get stabbed to death in a robbery in said Uber.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 02:37 PM
28

That's a very strange take, a fair minimum amount of paid sick days and simply days off should be given to everybody regardless of whether they have a family or not (fair amount because you're a human and additional days if you have a family), but does this really imply that they think only men who should unburden their wives back home have to have these rights, not because men need it but because their wives and kids need it?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 08:36 AM
–

People never even consider that a woman making a choice to rather have a kid alone now than later in a family is both an asshole and a selfish move, not to mention seriously irresponsible. No, money and a single mother isn't enough for a kid, especially when that mother isn't even mature enough to think of the future and what the best for children is instead of what she wants right there and then. And why should a man just magically be ready to be a father? That's not a responsibility you can fo…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:32 AM
5

Some women do the same sexualization and objectification, in fact because there's almost never any consequences, they do it a lot more brazenly, they're just more picky about who they find attractive. And all of them think about sex, just like men. As if it was among the most basic biological drives you can't possibly suppress and if you try, you end up with serious negative consequences.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 01:49 PM
1

male strippers Or celebrities. Or anybody they find "hot", really.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 01:44 PM
3

A lot of hate and zero self-awareness.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 10:23 AM
6

Authoritarians vs the people is never an issue of men against women, it's the most successful conspiracy theory in history that it is.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:25 PM
-2

Who said it didn't? But only because sexist women are tolerated, even praised, doesn't mean it's okay for men to be sexist.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:40 PM
-1

And racist people feel more comfortable around the same "race" but that doesn't make them not racist even if their decisions only affects them. You're doing the exact same thing feminists and today the wokes are doing when they deny men even the opportunity to talk, because women feel more comfortable around women. That's sexism if a woman "feels" like that and sexism if a man "feels" like that. It's nothing more than the perception based on bias concluding that another gender, not an individual…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:52 PM
-2

If you care more about your doctor's gender than their qualifications, you're in fact sexist.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 07:37 PM
0

Or just, you know, maybe accept that medical personnel's job is to see people in all kinds of circumstances, they're not there because they enjoy watching or touching people but because they want to help, and the direction we should be going is to not care what your doctor or nurse has between their legs. People are so fucking backwards sometimes and they somehow still manage to call it progressive. Are there idiots and creeps? Sure, such a position attracts both psychopaths and narcissists, but…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 10:05 PM
22

I hope I'm wrong and this is just a case of people actually doing what they're supposed to, but my skepticism tells me this became an issue mostly because she was harassing men in relationships so there were women involved at the receiving end.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:37 AM
15

They're most likely not even remotely as heavy as the real things would be
/r/PussyPass15/11/22 07:51 AM
20

This is known since forever and observed all across the globe, it's not a feminist conspiracy. SIDS only means there's nothing to point to a cause of death (most likely a lot of it are so far unknown genetic defects--the human body is good at surviving after a point but horrible at getting to that point), murder is quite obvious as it leaves behind physical damage.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 07:35 AM
19

Google translate says: What documents entitle citizens with disabilities to travel abroad during martial law Among such documents: a certificate confirming the relevant status; a pension certificate or a certificate confirming the appointment of social assistance, which indicates the group and cause of disability; a certificate for receiving benefits by persons with disabilities who do not have the right to a pension or social assistance, in a form approved by the Ministry of Social Policy. Does…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 08:35 PM
1

People always find a popular term to justify their behavior, it doesn't mean there's a new group of "evil men" popping up all the time, it only means a particular type of person latching onto some concept to "prove to the world" why what they're doing is necessary. Some do it unconsciously, some do it while being very well aware of it, but whether they believe it or not won't make something false true, and it definitely doesn't mean that a problem like this can be reduced to a singular issue, it…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:42 AM
3

I wanted to say this breaks the moderator guidelines but looked up the exact wording and found that Reddit rewrote it in this September and removed the relevant parts about mods having to engage in good faith. Considering so many mods always try and twist what people are doing to match a narrative and always escalate, you can only view this as Reddit officially justifying and encouraging this behavior.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:28 AM
3

People are prone to latch onto some popular concept to justify their behavior, it's true from the everyday person doing inconsequential things to mass murderers shooting up a place to crazed dictators invading a neighboring country. Whether they actually believe their own justification or not doesn't matter, it won't turn the false true.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:04 AM
13

So, not human rights violation but wasteful spending... of course. Sounds like a good thing until you realize probably shady "priests" will take it over with a dull knife and without anesthesia (like in India). It's not a win until it's banned and the practice is heavily punished.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:48 AM
108

Attractive people succeeding more is a wildly known phenomenon, the only thing these findings really show is that the mental health effects of beauty standards on learning are greater for men than for women.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 06:10 PM
13

The thing about Hollywood is that there they treat everybody who isn't famous like shit, using and abusing people aren't restricted to women, not even sexual abuse. Do women have it worse? Maybe in some aspects, but is it an anti-women sentiment shared by most if not all men instead of just elitist assholery coming from many on top, men and women? Nope.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 10:50 PM
14

Ah, yes, when women choose to be single, they're strong and independent (and also beg for support from the government in some places like South Korea I think because they don't like the reality of having to support themselves) but when men do it, they're infantile and should "grow up"
/r/MensRights08/11/22 10:12 PM
11

Porn in itself isn't an issue, exploitation can happen everywhere where people can profit from it. If men overspend or become addicted, that's a mental health issue with a root cause nobody's addressing because it's easier to just shout "porn did it." The same thing happens with drugs, only very recently started people in a few places acknowledging that it's not "evil drugs", it's people exploiting vulnerable people, from drug lords flooding the streets with more and more dangerous synthetic sub…
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:19 PM
14

Ever heard of that little known thing called the basic human rights, granted to every person without anything in return? Yeah, that's irreconcilable with drafts, no matter the circumstance. Every country that has a draft or implements it even during martial law is in direct violation of human rights.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:16 PM
1

Here's the thing. I won't name this sub because as I said it's official, but it's sci-fi and set in the distant future. In previous series the focus was always on that humanity is capable of overcoming adversity, coming together to make everybody's lives better, getting rid of petty squabbles about race, gender and sexuality, they can work with differing opinions, they accept any culture as long as it's not hostile, tolerance is hardwired into people, etc., and eventually end up with a society t…
/r/MensRights07/11/22 03:53 PM
13

Women didn't have an enemy so feminists decided to make one. That's the end goal of all this feminist and now woke bullshit, to turn men against women, and the wokes also added other real and fake "minorities" with no real rules on who belongs there but not the male sex. Feminists and the woke cult-like organizations/ideologies are fascism at its core, fighting the Fight with a capital F against some mythical enemy that didn't exist so they're slowly turning the supposed aggressors against the s…
/r/MensRights06/11/22 02:29 PM
8

They're just as bad. Try saying a "woke" movie, show or game has bad writing or acting and see how fast you get banned for attacking women and/or the LGBTQ community. The majority of mods are totally unhinged and regularly go on powertrips with no oversight.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 01:23 AM
10

That won't really work when there are official subreddits with no real alternatives doing this exact same thing. When you can get permabanned for saying a TV show is not the best in its franchise due to its weak writing and the reasoning is that that claim means you're attacking women and the LGBTQ community, you know there's shit in the water. In fact it's not even water but a cesspool at this point.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 01:14 AM
4

Although you have to wonder what's even the point of an authorized people list if they have to hear from the parent who's going to pick the kid up every time anyway. What happens if something happens to the mother, the people supposed to take care of the kid will simply be kept away and the kid is sent to stay with strangers until they figure out what's next?
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:58 AM
78

Male journalists killed: N (100%) This is what they want, but it would only be possible if women journalists were never sent anywhere even remotely dangerous so then they would squeal that "wOmEn CaN dO tHe SaMe JoB aS mEn! StOp ThE oPpReSsIoN!"
/r/MensRights03/11/22 05:40 PM
5

UN_Women, of course there is a UN_Women, and of course they're this sexist and hateful.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 05:36 PM
5

Women, 6 women makes 11%, not 6, OP probably mistyped it.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 05:33 PM
45

Sexual harassment and rape allegations became the witch hunts of the 21st century
/r/MensRights02/11/22 07:35 AM
23

And now he has a wife who probably has tests for him, too, and will probably hire a PI every time she imagines something is off. Not an upgrade.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 10:34 PM
22

Feminists have become so delusional that they outright say misandry is needed and it doesn't exist. FTFY, feminist logic is contradictory, among other things
/r/MensRights31/10/22 08:35 AM
23

Being a simp is far from masculinity, giving up control and letting yourself to be used is not masculine however you look at it.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 11:33 AM
3

The entire concept of an enthusiastic consent is stupid, first of all if you have to constantly clarify what you mean because the idea is so malleable, then you've already made a mistake by even using such a concept, but even with the most conservative views it still says non-verbal and implicit consent doesn't exist, which just makes no sense and feels like it comes from people who don't even know how people's sex lives especially in relationships work. Add to it the clause that consent can be …
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:41 PM
0

What do you mean it's not what due process looks like? Due process is that the accuser has to prove that the accused is guilty, the reverse is when innocent people go to prison when they can't prove their own innocence, something they cannot be required to do and very often it's impossible to do. A person cannot be ready to have evidence on hand for every possible claim anybody could ever think of, but that would be the minimum if the roles were reversed.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 11:58 AM
4

They also act as if a grown-ass woman, if poor and not American, wouldn't be able to make a decision for herself and/or be oppressed specifically because of her gender and also willing to continue being oppressed after moving somewhere else. It's incredible how out of touch people can be with reality. They truly believe there's some huge divide between their "land of the free" and everywhere else, going as far as to think the world is full of barbarian cultures living in an imagined past where, …
/r/MensRights27/10/22 09:23 AM
9

Are you from the US to be this delusional about what other countries look like? The majority of the world is pretty similar, we don't have cultures where people act that differently from each other, you'd have to go to the poorest regions in mostly Africa to find a woman who'd be out of place in the first world, but that woman wouldn't meet any western traditional ideas and most likely wouldn't be subservient at all. You'd probably also think of the Middle East, but women who move from the Middl…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:53 AM
6

Why do you assume those women can't even communicate and have such a different culture? The majority of the world is pretty similar, you'd literally have to go to the poorest regions to find women who'd be out of place anywhere else (even then it's highly unlikely that those women would be subservient or meet any western traditional ideas) but that's not what's happening in most cases when somebody finds somebody abroad.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:28 AM
17

I think they wanted to express their surprise that selling the same product to different sexes for different prices is illegal. The feminist view is always that if a man gets preferential treatment, it's wrong, if a woman gets it, it's good. Occasionally a law disagrees and says that nobody can be discriminated against based on sex or gender, and since preferential treatment for one group is just discrimination against another, they don't like this "attitude" of equality.
/r/PussyPass25/10/22 02:05 PM
2

Facepalm material
/r/MensRights25/10/22 09:59 AM
1

It makes sense from an evolutionary perspective, strictly as animal instincts go, it's definitely the best strategy. But after you develop sentience and intelligence, you have every tool to let go of all of those "traditional" roles in favor of an equal society, especially when your species is all over the planet and even has technological support that makes actions relying on past instincts redundant, counterproductive even. At that point you can't explain viewing half of humanity as expendable…
/r/MensRights25/10/22 08:59 AM
11

he'd have to be in protective custody for his own protection Yep, people always want to take the law into their own hands when it's a man but they're like "oh, poor thing, hope she gets the help she deserves" when the criminal is a woman.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 12:29 PM
10

Wikipedia, or the corporation behind it, puts a lot of effort into propaganda that the site is some critically acclaimed source of all information, an everything encyclopedia, that follows the rules of traditional peer review and academic publishing, and of course the two biggest lies that everybody can edit it and they use credible sources. Meanwhile they couldn't be more biased, often hostile when it comes to anything even remotely controversial, they gatekeep editing the sites harder than law…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 10:26 AM
20

A guy can't even have a normal body type anymore, must be jacked af with minimal body fat to be considered datable. That is indeed the expectation, however if you happen to work out but not also be "charming" and have a full wallet, you'll get the "stupid idiot thinks that's what women want, what a toxic manchild" bullcrap. Try pointing out that working out has a lot of benefits and not every man's doing it for women (in fact I'm pretty sure most don't), and you'll get ridiculed/shamed to death.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 11:45 AM
1

The death of women and children during or shortly after childbirth has been on the decline ever since Ignác Semmelweis, a doctor, a man, managed to almost single-handedly convince people and the entire medical community to wash hands before they assist at birth, among other things. He was laughed at because people have known nothing about how infections work yet, but he was persistent and proved his point. He's also called the savior of mothers. Pregnancy and child birth today (in the developed …
/r/MensRights20/10/22 07:25 PM
4

I wish my worst problem in life was to care about who other adults are in relationships with. Even then I wouldn't care.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:10 PM
-4

Don't confuse a real issue with people jumping on bandwagons and appropriating said issue, also attributing the increase in numbers to them is a common fallacy. How people present and treat gender has been changing since recorded history and probably since before that. If you think "tribes" don't have it, I'll just leave this and this here as a few examples (you can get the rest IF you want to). This has been a thing since forever, the increase in numbers is because the population itself is incr…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 10:06 AM
1

https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/134479?hl=en
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:45 AM
1

People twisting an idea to fit a narrative doesn't make that idea wrong. Objectification theory in itself only means objectification happens, it's done by men, women, and people do it to themselves. How studies try to twist that and show it only happens to women by men is a different issue but it does not mean objectification is non-existent and it also doesn't negate the fact that what we view as sexual is just a learned behavior.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:26 AM
1

From your very own link, a quote you literally pasted in but didn't bother to read and understand: This pattern was consistent the idea that women will sometimes criticize and police other women’s behavior as sexual objects, along with other predictions and extensions from objectification theory
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:11 AM
1

It's really incredible how there exists people today who think harassment can happen without the person being harassed knowing about it, as if it was some viral infection or something.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 07:15 PM
6

Exactly my thought, this is the manager discriminating for some reason only she could tell but she decided to put the blame on the usual scapegoats (and the steward feeding into this issue by probably not wanting to argue with a woman).
/r/MensRights18/10/22 07:09 PM
1

Men also can't tell who's a psycho and will pull out a knife (or gun) even in the middle of the day to kill you because you gave a passing look at them that they didn't like. It happens to men a lot more, we just can't afford to say "we're afraid of walking around"
/r/MensRights16/10/22 09:50 AM
3

I bet this time no feminist or woman will freak out that "old white men" are making decisions about them. Forcing our daughters, mothers, wives and sisters to fight our wars is wrong Funny how they imply that "our" means "every man's" as if the average man had any say in when a country goes to war. Really the only thing the average person can do is to vote for politicians, so unless they acknowledge that wars are politicians' wars and not the people's, they essentially are saying that only men's…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:29 AM
2

That reads like a scam, and a really bad one at that (they couldn't even check who deals with "obscene" things, the Obscenity Prosecution Task Force doesn't exist since 2011) but considering they asked for nudes of a 16-year-old, that's illegal even if the age of consent is lower where this scammer lives in, although US laws may apply regardless.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:11 AM
3

Ignoring part of history to show things in a different light is rewriting history. Omission is only not a lie if you don't claim or even imply that things you didn't omit are everything there is to know.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 09:31 AM
11

Society today: you're free to express whatever gender you are and act accordingly, except if you're a man who isn't actively trying to be something else, then you're shameful, violent, dangerous, evil, feared and hated.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 12:39 PM
5

I wouldn't call that rape under any circumstance. Rape needs a lack of consent, if consent was given even under false pretenses, that's not rape. It is highly immoral and usually illegal, but if lines aren't drawn, we end up with the feminist mindset where many are seriously promoting the blurring of the lines so much that heterosexual sex could be redefined as a man raping a woman because the woman can call it rape for any reason, even long after the fact for an unrelated reason like a future a…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:06 AM
12

I don't get why women expect everybody to like a bad movie or series only because it has women as the lead. Shows that are boring at best and offensive to men at worst, and a childish attempt at comedy all throughout won't be popular with men, that should be common sense.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:44 PM
1

Wait, they had gendered changing rooms? I don't think I've ever been to a shop, small or big, anywhere in my country where the changing rooms weren't gender neutral since forever (provided that the shop sells clothes for men and women), and nobody has any problem with it.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:39 PM
10

Which universe do these people live in?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:06 PM
39

Also Good Samaritan laws don't exist everywhere but where they do, they don't cover the same things, the same circumstances and the same people. For example pretty much in every place that requires a "good faith" for the protection to apply, a woman can argue that you did it for your own predatory satisfaction. And then there's places that legally require giving assistance from any random person... there you can be fucked whatever you do.
/r/PussyPass05/10/22 11:47 AM
1

Women freely admit to this but whenever you say women are less likely to find an average man attractive than a man to find an average woman attractive, the same women will get offended and take your head off.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:35 AM
1

The fact that there are people taking shit like this seriously should concern everyone who believes in equality.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:55 PM
1

The usual story, something went from being the prerogative of the elites (who happened to be mostly men but did not include all men, far from it) to being accessible to mostly everybody, then feminists decided they make it about them, people believed it and now they overcompensate by discriminating against the men who only had equal chances for a short time.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 10:03 AM
9

Abortion is also a special case because the two groups talk past each other, anti-abortion people say the embryo/fetus has to have rights to stay - nothing to do with women's rights, pro-abortion people say women should have rights to remove that embryo/fetus - this makes it into women's rights without addressing the claim that it's not about the women.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:01 AM
3

In reality more and more men affected by this the most realize how quotas and other feminist/woke shit create an environment where women get preferential treatment and opportunities they shouldn't get if equality and equal opportunity was the goal instead of equal outcome, and equal outcome only benefits the people who get to positions they shouldn't be able to. Even that benefit is short term only as it hurts the entire system on the long run, education, work, society, every system. Not to ment…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:45 AM
6

Her being drunk may not even mean much here, it sounds like that wardrobe was just dangerous and should've been thrown out years ago. You don't expect furniture to collapse on you even when you're sober.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:34 PM
1

And now feminists will believe the men did kill her, the police just covered it up because patriarchy. Pouring more gasoline to the fire.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:25 PM
1

This should actually be the standard, no evidence, no conviction. If there was no evidence, that is, who knows when everybody is biased from the start. The serious problem is how feminists, wokes, jobs, colleges and legal systems think the lack of evidence doesn't matter if a woman accuses a man, and how they also think a woman can never rape a man.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:14 PM
–

The wokes have really turned things around, feelings are facts and facts are misinformation.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:46 PM
72

A prime example of a pussy pass. Funny how nobody's gonna be riling up now or in any other similar case to demand imprisonment because he said so, and his word should be enough. That only applies when the sexes are reversed.
/r/PussyPass30/09/22 04:19 PM
2

1: maybe they test it mostly on men because mostly men apply to the tests? Also what about the reverse, if some medications are worse for women then some are worse for men. I'd also theorize in the initial phases of drug trials they may even want to weed out the really serious side effects before its tested on women considering men are generally viewed as expendable. 2: that doesn't even make sense, you can adjust the seat and the seat belt, and the airbags just don't care. And you shouldn't get…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:37 PM
1

It's incredible how deep feminist and recently woke-adopted propaganda has seeped into education
/r/MensRights28/09/22 11:49 AM
13

It can happen in any country even where draft is abolished already; even if some governments wouldn't be able to bring it back alone and don't have an "it's gone but not really" clause like the US (which they will definitely use most likely soon when China makes its moves to invade Taiwan, that won't be just a proxy war), they can still do it under martial law. They will do it under martial law.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 07:04 AM
15

Emotional labor in relationships is the brainchild of people who view relationships as inherently transactional instead of something built on emotions, affection, attachment and respect.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 03:02 PM
79

Just because someone is a parent doesn’t mean the criminal justice system should go easier on them You could even argue it teaches the wrong message to the kids of those parents.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 07:01 AM
1

With how feminists guiding how laws around sex related crimes change and widen what they include, I wouldn't be surprised if any kind of recording or even just pictures would be considered rape very soon if the other person doesn't know about it, and in some cases even if she did.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 06:54 PM
1

Better bet is to not have sex with someone until you have a long enough record of texts / IMs to reasonably be able to prove that they were a willing participant. And this is the exact reason why many are saying past communication of women shouldn't be considered in deciding if they're telling the truth. There's really no win today for the average man against false accusations. Not to mention when people go as far as to say women regretting something should count as getting raped.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 06:46 PM
2

Or, maybe, hot take, if you're in a safe neighborhood, you're relatively safe at night regardless of your gender, otherwise not so much and as a man you can't even rely on the occasional white knights among even the criminal elements, and even if they don't want to mug you, they could view you as a test of strength if you're built better or a "prank" opportunity and stab you a few times in the process. Not to mention how many times women lure men into a mugging or worse by either offering sex or…
/r/MensRights22/09/22 03:35 PM
6

Martial law isn't national laws (not that most countries' laws cover most human rights) and winners always get away with it; or in this case the country opposing Russia is getting away with it since how would it look if the UN determined that Russia and Ukraine are both guilty of forcing people into armed conflict even though they freely admit to it, they went as far as to name Ukrainian men who were already living abroad but didn't abandon their lives and return a criminal. But somehow it's not…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 06:41 PM
11

You forget that there is martial law in effect in Ukraine. Martial law overwrites every law and international agreement, even all the human rights. So if they can violate the most basic human rights of men, they could do it with women on the same grounds. They won't, but they could. Not that it's a sane thing to do, a sane society that actually believes what it preaches would consider drafting anybody a war crime.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:14 PM
1

Not just young American men but young men from every NATO country. Even underage boys, too, definitely from China and I don't think most NATO country leaders will have any problem mandating 16-year-olds to enlist at gunpoint if WWIII hits.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 12:09 PM
1

And it can also be contracted just by touching the other, in fact you most likely already have at least one form of HSV. Still you have more chance of getting terminal skin cancer just by going outside on a cloudy day than having a bad reaction to herpes. If you want to live in fear of the unlikely, it's your choice. Watch out for planes crashing into you and the nearest nuclear reactor exploding, too.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 07:04 AM
6

Herpes isn't really an STD, genital herpes is classified as such but only because its genital, however it's a mislabeling since both viruses can spread with any form of contact and not even condoms protect against them. 70-95% of people already have the most common form which usually causes oral herpes, almost everybody contracts that one as a kid; that's that small red bump you (yes, you reading this) get on your lips, sometimes other parts of your body every other blue moon, if you even get th…
/r/MensRights16/09/22 04:42 PM
11

This is also one reason why dinner dates are a stupid idea as first dates. You feel obligated to linger around at least until you finish eating instead of just leaving at any time when it's clearly not working. I mean a woman doesn't usually feel that, she can just "go to the bathroom", never return and nobody will question her decision, but not a man. Similar stands for double dates, don't do that as a first date, that's pretty much for two already couples.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:26 AM
2

Considering its name that sounds like a "debate" where the organizers have already determined that the conclusion will be a strong no and any argument against it will be ridiculed and laughed at without anybody addressing it or even trying to provide a counterargument, they may even try to make you and anybody showing how and why it does exist angry so they can ride that and fallacy their way out of having to argue, or maybe the moderators themselves won't allow anything not originating in a fem…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:06 AM
6

It's imperative to separate sex from affection That single sentence alone invalidates the entire article and speaks volumes about how out of touch whoever wrote it is with healthy sexuality. And the fact that it's not the only thing wrong in it, plus the glaring one-sidedness of the entire thing, just makes it insane. Yes, communication and trying to work things out is key, there are some good things in there, but name calling, blaming men alone for a bad sex life, saying men have to change whil…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:56 PM
21

It's imperative to separate sex from affection That single sentence alone invalidates the entire article and speaks volumes about how out of touch whoever wrote it is with healthy sexuality. And the fact that it's not the only thing wrong in it, plus the glaring one-sidedness of the entire thing, just makes it insane.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:54 PM
104

Self defense is one thing, however the wording is very important there considering feminism views violence against men by women as justified at all times regardless of the circumstances. They have a ready-made excuse for everything and things like the "she didn't feel safe" covers every possible base when a threat is objectively just imagined, and even when a woman's actions would be called a hate crime if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 12:40 PM
21

I wonder if somebody looked into it, how much of a trend would show where women got hired in all sorts of office positions but gravitated towards lesser paying HR and other predictable roles to not have overtime, weekends, emergencies and calls in the middle of the night, especially in comparison to men. I know it's a local trend that more stressful jobs don't hold women for long even with better pay, but it would be interesting to see how that looks across the globe. Personally I have a feeling…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 09:51 PM
1

That idea attracts women who don't see an issue with women cheating in relationships; and men who think this and have attracted women like that either change their minds when they're cheated on or become the laughing stock of their environment after they've been cheated on over and over again but they still stick to this idea.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:33 PM
33

apparently he lied and said there was no affair and after being questioned further eventually admitted to the affair, not a good look for him. Totally irrelevant how he looks, however a textbook motive for her. If you read into it, you know her defense was that she only wanted to catch him... which she already did, and that also doesn't explain why she switched lanes towards incoming traffic and stepped on the gas exactly at the right time to hit both of them. You also don't typically get out of…
/r/PussyPass06/09/22 09:34 AM
3

You can't even say that a famously woke TV show with a female lead (which by the way doesn't even come up) is not worthy of praise because of bad writing and the characters behaving in ways that simply doesn't fit the situations without getting permanently banned for not being welcoming towards people with different gender, race, sexual orientation, etc., things that also didn't come up not just in your comments but not even in the post.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 06:43 AM
2

Not really, however this is one of the very few cases a feminist argument about how women not caring doesn't matter is actually applicable to men; only because most men are thought and accept to not consider their rights, futures and lives being taken away as a problem does not mean it is ethical, moral, serves the benefit of men, serves the benefit of society and should continue.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 01:00 PM
1

OP fell and broke his leg. Women didn't help him because he was not at ground level, male PARAMEDICS patched him up. Nobody called firefighters, nobody needed equipment, what are you even talking about!?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:12 PM
7

And the way the show is being written, she won't even come close to the same trauma going forward. Spoilers ahead. A new identity definitely won't take over her body and run rampant with it all the time until she learns how to control it over a decade. She got the superpower without any of the drawbacks handed to her on a silver plate, a successful lawyer who gets "constant mansplaining" by a guy who really just disagrees but is promptly kicked out from her office by an overenthusiastic woman wh…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 09:25 AM
11

So they took the idea of human cannon fodder and really leaned in on it.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:11 PM
1

Ah, yes, therapy, by which they mean gaslighting and brainwashing to convince men that they are hardwired to be dangerous predators of women and should fix themselves accordingly by oppressing everything masculine, feelings, thoughts, even instincts, and feel ashamed for the rest of their lives.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:45 AM
1

I wonder how far society can radicalize itself before it tears itself apart. The only alternative to this is the far right doing its own crazy, it really seems there is nothing sane in-between two extremes that's for everybody and may have a chance to make things better.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:36 AM
6

People are interested more in things they're interested more in? Such breakthrough. Jokes aside, as long as schools (and often parents as well) treat boys as faulty girls and adopt the idea that boys should have female role models (especially when it's a mandatory trope today that women with leading roles in every media has to shit on men constantly, or they go even further and portray every man who could be a role model as an incompetent bumbling idiot at least compared to women), boys will per…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:25 AM
14

And they don't even argue about the same thing, the anti-abortion crowd, almost half of who are women, is saying the embryo has to have rights while most of the pro-abortion people yell "men are against women's bodily autonomy" and they wonder why they can't resolve the issue and make the people against abortion change their minds for decades. Feminists are using that problem to divide men and women further, as usual, and the world applauds.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:49 PM
8

How did she make the connection between wise women and witches? Witches mean totally different things depending on what exact time period and region you're talking about, there was no single class of some witch culture (and nothing only applicable to women) and things that would count as such--pagan as normal people call it--were also practiced by men since they were nothing more than beliefs and religions predating Christianity and lumped together by Christians, men and women, under a derogator…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:58 AM
94

While knowing your limits is good at every job, at some point you wonder why people with too many real or imagined limits want to be in situations they consistently can't handle. There are situations where paramedics won't approach, they call the firefighters instead, they have better equipment and are trained to walk into unstable environments. But outside those situations not being able to do the job should amount to not getting to keep the job.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:47 AM
10

That doesn't really matter when Wikipedia decides what source is accurate and factual. The person here is arguing how if something goes against the mainstream (in this case feminism), it cannot be a valid source, only "bunkum" and the article is designed to disrupt Wikipedia. That's the entire argument with a bunch of words making it seem they have more to say unless you read it. Now, we'll see if the others go for it or not, but you really don't need more when the site operates without any kind…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 08:49 PM
1

Honestly it makes no sense to think women should be conscripted and it will help the case of conscription getting abolished somehow. It's just more people who don't want to be there, and if a country takes that route anyway, they really don't care about what's reasonable. Also if there is war, the first thing that happens is martial law, every man is sent to fight and every woman is allowed to evacuate. Even if there are women conscripted, unlike men's, their conscription can expire. When conscr…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 08:50 AM
2

It also seems to imply that the real dad stepped down willingly, something that could be true but not necessarily the case. Especially if he died.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 08:01 AM
4

Yeah, no, Hungary doesn't belong here, I'm from this place to my regert and this government mastered how to twist anything and everything into their very own agenda: creating a society that worships Orbán while being oppressed and silencing every voice against him and his lackeys. In Orbán's eyes a man doesn't even have any value apart from working and working and working so the mother of the children doesn't have to do anything, just give birth, then give birth again, then again, etc. Create a …
/r/MensRights28/08/22 07:11 PM
2

Sure
/r/MensRights27/08/22 08:59 PM
25

Some theorize that's the reason for how the Middle East treats women, a long while ago the expectations of men became overwhelming while the expectations of women were nonexistent, so men decided to apply malicious compliance. Of course you can't prove it, you can't prove any theory about that situation, the factual reasons are lost to history, but it makes you think. Men and women have always lived together, we evolved together, the feminist idea of men being simply hard wired to hate and oppre…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 12:45 PM
0

They really managed to mix feminist logic into that idiotic narrative of only people with multiple children in a family of a man and a woman worth a thing? This is definitely sponsored by the government, not by feminism. They just use an idea they saw people come up with in the west and aligned it with their own views. The government is the only one here pushing this "we need the nuclear family" though not because they care but because they're extremely homophobic, and additionally they're pushi…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:29 PM
1

It's not about when they take advantage of her, it's about when she's making the decision to drink, then while drunk (or even just tipsy, really) making the decision to have sex, then after sobering up regretting it and claiming she lost her agency (which takes a lot more alcohol by the way than most people can drink and not lose consciousness). And even though she lost her agency (she didn't) of her own free will (but that is true, she did choose to drink), she can claim that is something she i…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 09:42 PM
2

Using alcohol consumption to blame others for your own mistakes is the typical "I'm baby" defense. Sadly it works. Drinking alcohol and getting shitfaced isn't a requirement to have a good time, but many women insist it is and aren't even trying to imply they take responsibility, no matter what happens. Everybody universally agreed that doing shit while you're drunk is on you, but as usual feminism managed to create an exception to the detriment of men. Men can't do that, men can't blame alcohol…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 09:25 PM
0

Do you know what the problem is with tolerating intolerance, even if it's just leaving it in its "natural habitat"? It will crop up here and there, most people don't care, some scoff at it, some share an encounter amusingly as "you won't believe these crazy people" but once in a while it's different, maybe one in a hundred people will think and say "hey, I think they're onto something." Time passes like this, months, years, this intolerance picks up every hundredth person crossing paths with it …
/r/MensRights26/08/22 03:56 PM
1

What do you think have always been the standard policy in bars, officially or unofficially, when it came to somebody creeping on women? Unless you managed to find a place absent of security and often fueled by drugs, you were always subject to get thrown out, for anything, really. But if women complained, you did not have the option to stay inside or even argue, that has always been the case. It still is, unless a man is really rich or is with somebody really rich, he's really not in any positio…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 03:46 PM
10

I wonder if there is a country in the world that would let a male prime minister off the hook after all that happened. Most likely a male PM would be forced to resign, that would only depend on the level of corruption around him. There is a reason political leaders can't just do whatever they want and if they do, that will bite them in the ass inevitably one way or the other. Also people go to incredible lengths to justify actions of a woman that would not be tolerated from a man, and it seems p…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:42 PM
15

If you want to be sexy, you should expect people to find you sexy. What part of sexy do you think isn't related to sex? Hell, before all this woke bullshit started, sexologists were saying sex starts the moment you step outside, as in sexuality is a natural and deeply rooted part of every human and there's not a single moment in your life when it's not there. The wokes just redefined what used to be healthy human interaction as borderline rape if just 0.001% of something isn't ideal in the mind …
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:55 PM
24

And the response will be: eewww, you're making me uncomfortable, somebody CALL THE POLICE. They didn't just ban "staring", it's in the article, they call the cops on you for everything that "has made someone feel uncomfortable"
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:51 PM
5

The venue also asked clubbers not to turn up if their "sole purpose" for their night out is the meet someone to "pick up". Yeah, because meeting people is so easy everywhere else there's no reason to go to a club to try it. Will they also kick out women who go there to meet somebody or just have a one nighter? They'll kick out the cougars, too, that often creep out young men and predate on them? Or will this place turn into their Mecca? If we receive reports of any behaviour that has made someon…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:41 PM
41

Didn't you hear, blind people can still stare, they have to especially watch where they're looking
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:38 PM
4

Double standards. If men did the same, they'd be reported, deplatformed and charged IRL. Somebody just asked on another sub if unsolicited dick picks are sexual harassment. It comes up over and over. The answer is yes, and so is when women send you nudes or even just promotions of their sexual content, but nobody treats it the same way and nobody really cares. Sure, the motivation is different, but the end result is the same: unsolicited sexually explicit content. On Twitter this is the reason m…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 10:38 AM
3

Incel very very briefly meant what whoever came up with it wanted it to mean. Today it's just a catch-all term women, mostly feminists throw around when they want to disparage, shame or even slander men.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 12:44 PM
13

You can clarify in the body, though
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:27 AM
1

Well sex trafficking is just a made up nonsense word that means "prostitution" but is intended to sound like it means someone got kidnapped and enslaved. That doesn't happen. Prostitution and sex trafficking have nothing in common. Prostitution is when an adult who's capable of decision making is doing one specific form of sex work of their own free will. The majority of sex work in the west at least is like that, but that doesn't mean it's the only kind. It's almost always illegal of course but…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 05:12 PM
8

I don't have time to read all of it but how women vs men feel about violence/harassment is such a hugely biased comparison. Women are made to believe from a young age that they're in constant danger, especially at night. Nobody tells this to men. Also the media redefined what sexual harassment means, many women today believe nonsensical ideas like if a man doesn't go to the other side of the street, he's acting predatory, and many go as far as thinking a blind man is able to sexually harass a wo…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 04:13 PM
8

About prostitution, I remember seeing a TV show where somebody was killing young boys forced into being a prostitute in London maybe a hundred years ago. Since then I always wonder how many such cases exist, not murder but men and boys in the exact same situation we see feminism so concerned about all the time, sex trafficking, or if anybody ever even looked into it with an objective view. We know slavery is very much a practice still in many parts of the world, usually men are bought and sold a…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 03:59 PM
5

This is actually worse than that, what Hungary encourages is having children for the tax cuts and money instead of wanting to have children. It's good for the government because those kids will be neglected (especially considering that the education and health care system in Hungary are all but in ruins) and they'll see the government as the only source of support as they grow up, even though they won't really get anything, they'll just think they do. It's fucked up and everybody with a single b…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 02:26 PM
3

Just the usual continuation of causing a wider and wider divide between men and women by an incredibly biased narrative cherry picking anything and everything it can to make the world and men as a group in it look like something they're not and never were.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 08:57 AM
6

There's nothing you have to do, really. Americans make a big deal out of a foreskin because few have it and disinformations are plenty, but the thing is, the body evolved to take care of itself. Unless you put stuff on your penis that doesn't belong there, it's going to be perfectly fine without any special attention. The entire world is the proof of this, it never comes up anywhere, ever, because it's a non-issue.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 11:59 PM
3

Ah, yes, because so many men's issues get so much more funding compared to women's issues... oh, wait, it's the other way around.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 09:51 PM
2

Or maybe men just don't like hostile propaganda attacking them and trying to convince the sane women in their lives if they still have any, to do the same.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 04:58 PM
217

I'm pretty sure you can't sue a gym manager for letting a blind man work out and not requiring him to "see" where they're "looking" or wear blindfolds. There is a limit to what can be filed as a lawsuit and so far anti-discrimination for the disabled is stronger than Karens or the wokes. It's more likely that the manager was a simp
/r/MensRights15/08/22 07:53 AM
2

Yep. If you have no intentions of becoming a father, you should not be forced to, for multiple reasons, not even financially. And the "but you had sex" argument is also not valid because women participate knowing the risks and they are no more entitled to sex than men.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 10:42 PM
17

Greg Matos, PsyD, ABPP is a board-certified couple and family psychologist. I'm worried for the men in the relationships that this guy "helps" Also, unless suddenly most women turned lesbian, any increase in lonely men also means the same level of increase in lonely women. Where's the analysis on why that's happening? Or, maybe, it's not an issue with men but an issue with totally unnatural expectations coming from places like the totally unnatural world of dating apps and fucking TikTok!? Also …
/r/MensRights11/08/22 08:27 PM
3

I don't think it's about staying together or not. If both parties are willing, they can make shared custody work, they don't have to live together but both can be there for the kid. They also don't have to shit on the other all the time, or at all, really, provided that we're talking about at least decent people. The issue is that when women are unwilling, everybody accepts it even if there's not a single reason for the fathers to stay out of the kids' lives. On the other hand if men are unwilli…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 02:53 PM
23

Mental health issue my ass. If you kill yourself, that's a mental health issue. If you kill your kids, intentionally out of revenge to hurt the father no less, and scrape your own neck to appear suicidal, that's called being evil and a scum of humanity.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 11:34 AM
19

I googled it (without my account in incognito so my search history won't skew the results) just to try and except one Times article and a single YouTube video, all results are "dispersing the myths" around it by concluding it exists and it's a bigger issue than most think. You can't trust Google like this, it doesn't return relevant, correct or trusted results, it returns the most visited pages and it's highly affected by who Google thinks you are, where you're from and what you want to see.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 10:19 PM
7

That's true for any hero role, if a hero thinks they're better than anybody because something they, the hero, were born with or that they're better than other people born with something, they don't deserve the hero role/title anymore.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:05 PM
1

Gender and sex are different things, and that's only an issue because insecure people make it an issue. Woke is not about that (although it is functionally similar to ideas that want every person to conform to the gender=sex view), the reason woke is a problem is because it doesn't care about gender or anything, it's the ideology that there exists a single perspective, a single point of view, a single opinion that is absolute and fundamentally correct. A woke person thinks everybody has to think…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:23 AM
13

The Patriarchy strikes again /s
/r/MensRights28/07/22 12:28 PM
4

The report said: "Young male drivers account for 80% of young driver fatalities. "Young male drivers are four times more likely to be killed or seriously injured on the road than drivers aged 25 years or older." While I'm not questioning risk-taking behavior in young men, did these statistics account for things like much more men working as drivers, or have they even looked into if men drive more in general? Also what are they driving? Truck drivers generally need a lot of experience to be safe …
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:01 PM
19

He added: ‘The Western world should be should be aware of how terrifying this is for the Ukrainian people.’ The western world would do the same if there was a war in any of those countries, all the western countries started praising Zelenskyy's decision to violate basic human rights of men, even his decision that Ukrainian men living abroad are criminals if they don't return to fight. We'll see which country will extradite those men after the war is over and Ukraine presses charges officially, b…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 01:01 PM
4

When I was a teen and started presenting symptoms of my disorders, two things happened. Most people said I should just man up, and some decided to use it for their own entertainment, so they manipulated, gaslighted and abused me mentally. They were girls so nobody cared of course, in fact it was somehow my fault. Several years later and I have to hide as much as I can to be able to live in society and hold a job without the fear of getting ostracized and used again. And health care doesn't care,…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 12:06 PM
13

It all depends on if she finds you attractive or not, and many other possible perceptions, but it's not about what you said. In either case, unless you're 100% certain that her perception of you is favorable in every way, you should consider this part of the Miranda warning as applicable during every interaction: Anything you say may be used against you.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 07:10 PM
4

Gremlins would be the good analogy since unlike the patriarchy, the laws of physics actually exist and are the reason of every plane crash on a fundamental level.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 04:00 PM
37

That's messed up, however the instigation, especially of the masses like what this book is, must be illegal.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 12:46 PM
19

There is nothing masculine about promoting murder of kids.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 09:46 PM
29

There are also the ones who suggested other ways of killing the kid like smothering or just not tying the umbilical cord. As if that makes a fucking difference to murdering a newborn. WTF did she bother cutting his throat? It's a fing newborn. Just not tying the cord would kill it. How could she bring herself to do that? Yeah, what the hell? Maybe she wanted it over quickly, but why not something less gory? She cut the baby’s throat?? Not even smother if you must, but cut the throat?? ThTs just …
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:51 PM
0

This has nothing to do with men's rights, people not complying with safety regulations were never allowed to just ignore them.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:05 PM
12

Suggests its ban to women who support it and see them claim that it's in their rights to choose it for their sons. The same is true for men who support it, but parental rights are very often interpreted simply as women's rights, and with good reason. In most cases women can overrule whatever men want as parents, for the justice system to not side with a woman, she had to fuck up a LOT of things.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:45 PM
-4

Guns provide a feeling of power like nothing else. Without the right mental framework and training to handle it, it can easily take people down the wrong path. There's a reason the place with the shooter problem is the place that sells guns as candy. It's just basic psychology.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:35 PM
11

And people wonder why the far right is getting stronger with crazier and crazier ideas. It's a response to the crazier and crazier far left, but you're not supposed to call that out, somehow only one extreme is wrong.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:38 PM
5

That's a very transparent pandering to feminists.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:04 PM
41

"experts believe that under the right circumstances, forgetting an infant or child in the back seat could happen to anyone" I wouldn't trust "experts" who talk shit like this. If somebody forgets a kid there and the kid dies, that's manslaughter and they deserve prison for it. It's not a tragic accident, it's an unforgivable crime.
/r/PussyPass28/06/22 09:33 PM
11

It's way too common nowadays because "women have no agency" when it comes to them hurting others, and if somebody doesn't have agency, they cannot be responsible for their actions. Basically the "I'm baby" meme but taken seriously and applied in practice. Many of the wokes want to basically normalize polygamy, whether only for women or anybody varies, but that's one of their goals. And not polyamory, they conflate these two all the time but very few people can work with that or even know how it …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 04:44 PM
5

I propose mandatory lobotomy to politicians who talk this level of stupid
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:54 PM
3

You do know that there are countries other than the US, too, don't you? Many have active conscription and some are considering it again. And in the Ukraine all it took was a single person's decision to make every man, even abroad, either a soldier or a criminal, something that can happen everywhere, the USA, too, and even where laws prohibit the draft. Martial law overwrites both civilian and human rights and the people making those decisions are never held accountable, Zelenskiyy is celebrated …
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:24 PM
14

Feminism has successfully convinced everybody that abortion rights is about women's rights and taking it away is on men. Even serious people who I thought were rational thinkers fail to see through the lies anymore and the entire international community follows suit. This is good for republicans (or more precisely anti-abortion supporters) because nobody's presenting any valid counterargument in their eyes since in their eyes abortion cannot happen because the embryo/fetus has the rights to live…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:36 PM
10

Typical red herring and typical feminist move, instead of trying to solve the problem, i.e. politicians making a living out of catering to religious bigots who think human rights have to be extended to every embryo/fetus regardless of its age, they use this to divide men and women even further apart by making it out to be men's attack on women's rights. It was never about women, it was always about the embryo/fetus but abso-fucking-lutely nobody even acknowledges it in the media or even social m…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:10 PM
11

We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time. WTF would a news site need cookies that violate the GDPR for any legitimate reason even by US laws?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:44 PM
1

And I'm keep saying this should not be made into an issue with women's rights, that's just a massive red herring from a) feminists so they can add more oil to the fire and divide men and women further, and b) supporters of anti-abortion so people aren't looking into the root cause that allows this and many other insane rules. This is an issue with a government allowing religious beliefs to influence policies and laws. That should be done away with totally and we wouldn't have this issue, scienti…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:55 PM
8

I see Facebook also doesn't care about hate groups when they're all women and/or attacking men.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:59 PM
1

Are you stupid or intentionally don't read the second part of sentences?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:22 AM
8

A teenage boy's dream until it happens, well not the rape part but the sex part on his very own terms, however after that it's a trauma, possibly life-long with not getting help and nobody even taking it seriously. Teenage girls fantasize about having sex with grown ass men the same way, in fact you could argue that unlike boys, it's not uncommon when girls initiate successfully, yet nobody uses it as an excuse for male rapists, and not just because it'd be a non-sequitur argument.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 06:02 PM
3

And if the next time she's not paying attention while driving (she didn't even get a proper ban from driving) with her kid and the kid dies, people will adapt the surprised Pikachu face and still won't understand the issue with not punishing crime.
/r/PussyPass23/06/22 05:38 PM
5

A victim's family can't just excuse a crime, that's not how criminal law works. At least really fucking shouldn't.
/r/PussyPass23/06/22 05:32 PM
19

Break the law, break the law again by killing a person, and get off with a slap on the wrist because "poor woman will have to live with her actions and think of her daughter". Typical. She should live with her actions behind bars and they should think of her daughter indeed, no kid should be raised by somebody so irresponsible and next time the kid may die as she's not paying attention while driving (15 years ban in one state? That's not a ban).
/r/PussyPass23/06/22 05:26 PM
5

Ad hominem much?
/r/MensRights21/06/22 11:42 AM
28

If you look at what ideas feminists have, then look at how fascists behave, you will find a lot of the same. The patriarchy is the most prominent example, a big evil enemy smart enough to control the world but stupid enough that a small group or an individual will be able to defeat it if they just get all the power and control, and nobody even questions their methods.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 06:36 PM
8

Danielle claimed that Michael stabbed himself on January 11, 2019, after finding flirty text messages from another man on her phone. She later said he had a heart attack. She then changed her story, to insist it was self defense, admitting she stabbed him in the shoulder but saying he was strangling him at the time. So, she lied first, twice, which is not something you do if you were about to die thus killed your attacker. Also, if you were strangled, even by a 65-year-old, that's pretty easy to…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 03:54 AM
34

Definitely, they even have it in their rules, they say in the introduction that "We are a welcoming subreddit and support the rights of all genders." but then as a rule "We ask that you keep this community awesome by submitting content that is relevant to our experiences as women, for women, or about women. Several topics are not considered relevant, such as [...] Surveys, Research [...] Issues affecting men too" Talk about an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 08:22 PM
18

And feminists after seeing this video would look you into the eye and say something along the lines of "this did not happen, women don't act like this, in fact he was asking for it, he was dressed provocatively, he enjoyed it, clearly, he did not just say he feels comfortable because he had no other choice, it's all a conspiracy of the patriarchy, you can clearly see those poor women being harassed by that man who obviously manipulated them to do this so he can undress himself in front of them, …
/r/PussyPass14/06/22 08:22 PM
12

The witch trials were people making up excuses to get rid of people they disliked or competed with. Women accused women, men accused men, too, there were no rules. It wasn't a gendered issue, like almost nothing was. And the idea behind it started mostly from superstitions around mental illness and unexplained phenomena like sleep paralysis.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 12:24 PM
5

Women also ave to turn up to a doctor periodically from a young age for their screenings, that can definitely ease them into going to a GP more often. Men don't have that, here they don't even advise prostate exams before you get close to the retirement age. Not to mention the "man up" treatment many men get as boys, not just from men, definitely not from men in most schools. Also, there's the expectation to always be a provider, and/or protector. Add all that up and many men draw the conclusion…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:17 PM
4

There's so many things wrong with that statement, it's pretty much a choose your own fallacy. Calling it non-sequitur would make the most sense to me.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:28 AM
30

How the hell is this piece of shit in any higher position than... I wanted to say picking up garbage but most men there didn't do anything wrong to deserve her presence.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 06:40 AM
9

A much lower percent are murdered by terrorists, clearly terrorism is no threat to society following this logic.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:29 AM
14

If the genders were reversed, people would encourage her to break up with him.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:38 PM
73

This is such a stupid argument, a very typical case of some women wanting to argue about anything and everything that does not matter in any way, shape or form.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:18 PM
7

Murder is never justified, that's why it's murder. Killing somebody by self defense if your life is in imminent danger, that is justified, everything else is murder. It's fucked up that there are people who defend murder, even legally.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:48 AM
1

If our civilization collapses, chances are a key reason will be quotas in every company and government that was meant to be operated by people best suited for the job. Not to mention quotas open the door for incompetent people, too.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:47 PM
16

But as far as I know that only works if you have an iPhone, the alert. If you have Android, last time I heard, you had to download an app, which is expected, but you also had to actively search for it, it didn't work in the background.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 08:09 PM
3

That men allow themselves to get physically abused by women definitly has roots in some fucked up ideas on what it means to be a man. Or, maybe, some people are just non-confrontational, they're experiencing Stockholm syndrome, they're stronger and don't want to seriously injure a weaker person (so far these are independent of gender), and/or they know nobody would believe them and view it as self defense.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 01:43 PM
21

toxic masculinity: a catch-all term for every and any action a man did, does or hypothetically could do if it can be interpreted in a negative way from any feminist viewpoint, even if that interpretation requires taking it out of context and a non sequitur argument as justification on why it counts.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 01:38 PM
17

People confuse freedom of speech with freedom of consequence. The latter should never exist. Not that freedom of speech has anything to do with physical and mental abuse.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:48 PM
15

You assume that every information there will be used and made available to whoever wants it, however that's not how anything works and it would be immensely illegal. The thing is, we can't wave away the need for evidence, no matter what (although the UK is exactly the country that usually pushes for that with sexual assault and rape, this is just one of many). Evidence is the only thing that should matter in any case, it's a basic necessity, not an extra. Physical, clear-cut evidence is relative…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 10:09 PM
3

Kevin? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ie6H6-lkHPk
/r/MensRights31/05/22 03:07 PM
9

Transphobic my ass, that's just pure misandry.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 01:19 AM
6

Companies like Citi have "diversity hiring policies" which basically means quotas. They don't care who fits a job better, who performs better, they only care about virtue signaling, whether it's women, Indians, people with some disability or whatever they come up with at any given moment. I know the toxic atmosphere companies like this have from the inside and they're always moving the goalpost. Worst of all, the people they drag in like this usually flee soon after they learn how much they actu…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 02:13 PM
3

Wokeness is a very narrow-minded approach to things where everybody thinks they're right about everything, they think they know everything better, especially what's in the best interest of everybody, and they believe any other opinion and even contradictory fact has to be eliminated even by force. An environment like that is a perfect breeding ground for hate.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 04:14 AM
5

Maybe that's the point, humiliation. I wouldn't be surprised anymore when it comes to the UK.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 02:10 AM
3

Sorry! This content is not available in your region
/r/MensRights29/05/22 06:49 PM
3

So, I'm assuming you analyzed the bill and can provide that analysis to support your claim. Otherwise go away.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 04:14 AM
4

Indoctrination usually starts very early in life
/r/MensRights27/05/22 07:24 PM
2

Sexual orientation has nothing to do with gender, with how gender is defined today, you can just identify as nonbinary regardless of your heterosexuality and 100% male characteristics. And that will also quickly show you who actually believes in it and who's just talking... I have a feeling the vast majority of the wokes fall into the latter category and eventually they will start gatekeeping as well. If they haven't already started it to exclude the male sex.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:51 PM
4

Double standards. Trans women want the right to not disclose that they were men and I've never heard anybody getting convicted for it, but somehow if trans men are doing it, it's suddenly a disturbing and traumatic sexual assault. Also, this is incredibly stupid, if you can't fucking tell the difference between a real penis and a plastic one strapped on, that's on you. But I have a feeling he could've had a real penis transplanted and the double standard would still hold. Note: my opinion is tha…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 05:50 PM
2

You seriously underestimate how far businesses go nowadays to virtue signal. Also, SpaceX doesn't work with private companies only but also government agencies, and nothing they provide is irreplaceable in any way. Not to mention if it turns out that Musk did what he is accused of and high ranking people in his companies helped him cover it up, that could end up becoming a shitshow.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:14 AM
3

Pretty much this is the takeaway here. Doesn't matter if Musk turns out to be a predator or a victim of false accusation, people can't and won't remain impartial when a man is accused even while a high profile case that shows how damaging taking sides too early can be is going on in front of their eyes.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:41 PM
4

Who cares what she thinks about it? Everybody who does or considers doing business with SpaceX cares what she thinks.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:38 PM
2

Imperfect victim. Let's break this down. Imperfect, meaning her lies are not up to feminist standards; victim, a synonym for a woman according to feminism.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 07:08 PM
18

Or discovered only after a guilty sentence was made. Those can be used to skew the statistics by leaving them out.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:26 PM
4

Guys, inherently breasts have nothing to do with sex. In the US it was illegal for men to be topless, too, for a long time, for the same reason, it was deemed to be indecent. But progress was made. And there are still cultures that view men not covering their entire body or men shaving as indecent. We also know that all the cultures isolated from us don't view breasts as "secondary genitals", and that's a stupid idea anyway, they have nothing in common. Can they be a target of sexual arousal and…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 06:40 PM
7

“[I’m] devastated to be honest,” Johns said. “If the roles were reversed would I be getting pretty much the same slap on the wrist?” If the roles were reversed, he'd get an extended prison sentence because he was drunk. But somehow if women are drunk, it stops being an aggravating circumstance and the "I'm baby" argument is valid. Sexist laws and practices to the core.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 11:54 AM
7

You know, equality, breaking the glass ceiling and other feminist buzzwords.
/r/PussyPass21/05/22 12:29 AM
1

He's already been crucified on all the other subs that shared this story. People can't withhold judgement and can't even imagine a woman accusing somebody, especially a rich white man, with something that's not true, not even now with the Johnny Depp case being all over the media. Nothing ever changes.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 08:28 PM
11

But with policies catering to feminism (and to the also radical wokes) creating the next generation of rules and laws, the number of both people who have men in their lives and who get any education to have a critical thought will only decrease.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:24 PM
4

Toxic masculinity is whatever feminism needs it to be to make men look bad in any given situation, even when men aren't even involved.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:52 AM
40

Honestly, I've never seen a single woman in my 33 years on this planet in any job, in a factory or in an office, who showed the signs of a period feminists in the west claim women experience every month. They're either very good at hiding it or they simply aren't crippled by something they had over a decade getting used to and learning to manage, and know to take pain killers if they experience more than discomfort. But I do hear people, men and women alike, complain about headaches regularly. T…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:34 PM
1

Why do people defend ideas shown to be clearly wrong? Indoctrination and lack of free* education is the answer. And in this case it doesn't help that the vast majority weren't asked about it and could never experience what the foreskin is like normally. *free of dogmatic teachings, although free of price would also help where it's not available
/r/MensRights16/05/22 11:56 AM
3

When they think nobody's looking women behave the same sexist way as they accuse men, only men and all men behaving? No way! /s
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:19 PM
4

What an incredibly stupid and wasteful idea. And when a man misunderstands it and engages, they'll claim he's sexually harassing that woman?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:48 PM
12

here will be other actions that radfems will declare offensive and dangerous There already are. They're already telling women that if a man is walking behind them alone, they're in danger. Very strange how so many don't see it for what it is. Divide and conquer. They make both women and men fear each other, women fear being attacked by every man, men fear being perceived as predators and accused of sexual harassment for no reason by every woman. That's their goal.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:43 PM
8

With how feminists define sexual harassment, the difference among unrelated statements, casual compliments and sexual harassment in most cases can be only how a woman perceives a man and what she assumes his intentions are. It's actually barbaric how something totally subjective can become a crime, and the only evidence needed is somebody thinking something.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:36 PM
1

Nobody's ignoring them, but feminists do push for ignoring every man who dies or even struggles, which is a serious problem that only makes the situation worse. The majority of policy makers today cater to feminist views, and the majority of resources are allocated based on feminist ideas that treat a woman with situational depression as a more serious concern than a man with persistent depressive disorder and even psychosis.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:10 PM
2

There is a massive difference between using a suicide attempt to get attention and actually killing yourself. People who don't make that distinction are actively contributing to the problem of suicides not getting prevented. Also, suicide attempts are an extremely wide spectrum with no clearly defined requirements. If I make a few cuts on my wrist, am I just cutting myself or attempting suicide but failing? Is it one attempt or multiple? It all depends on who's counting and for what reason.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 12:55 PM
2

And what do they do if their male passengers start saying that they're nonbinary? Or do they define who they can refuse service to as male because what they mean by nonbinary in case of their drivers is female nonbinary and not male nonbinary; so they only want to cater to women's irrational fears, really? Remember, nonbinary is not trans, it's just an adjective both sexes can use if they don't (or don't want to) conform to gender norms. They don't even have to look a certain way.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 06:24 PM
17

They are, but a policy like that is not virtue signaling and not discriminatory. Feminism and woke culture mandates both.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 06:13 PM
11

If you describe somebody as a bald cunt as the article says, that makes it a whole different adjective, though. Anything can be an insult if used as an insult. I can call somebody a nice person and still make it clear that I mean shitty asshole by it.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 01:01 PM
2

Harmful way. Trusting individuals has no place in legal justice (for a myriad of reasons, lying to get what they want is just one), taking claims seriously does.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:26 AM
1

I always wonder what they think men should do, whip out the magic patriarchy membership card and tell the Supreme Court what to do?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 06:59 AM
4

I wouldn't go as far as to say that all feminists believe this. I'd say most feminists were lead to believe this by the "leaders" of feminism who knew exactly what they were doing and what lies they were telling. And in my opinion even among the ones who believe it, only the ones that are stupid as a plate of rocks couldn't see the major problems with the claims. I think the vast majority just don't want to think for themselves, something that we see a lot these days especially in politics as a …
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:08 PM
1

That's not how it works, women abusing men is all around in media already, depicted exactly as perfectly normal and the desiderable outcome of most interactions, for the entertainment of women of course, and women eat it up. Most men on the other hand can't really publicly point out how bad it is because then they're labeled misogynistic somehow and lose people, maybe even jobs over it.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:44 AM
0

Indeed, it's not about women's rights but about who thinks removing the embryo is essentially murder and how they justify that opinion, which are almost always religious views. Feminists making this into something that it's not is just one more attempt at dividing men and women, the favorite feminist pastime.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:02 PM
30

As soon as medical trials show any success, feminists will start the narrative that men should not have it because they'll just lie about it. It already comes up occasionally. I actually wouldn't be surprised if funding would be cut for any promising product in favor of some feminist shit.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 11:07 PM
16

If this was a he said, she said case, sure, it would be a pussy pass. But with proper evidence that's not the case anymore. Murder charge can't apply for self defense, maybe some form of manslaughter but that depends on what circumstances the killing actually happened under. If she had no way of fleeing and asking for help while being in lethal danger, that is a justified self defense. “In reaching this conclusion, our office conducted an exhaustive review of all available evidence and applicabl…
/r/PussyPass08/05/22 05:18 PM
12

Or maybe we just know that men are much less likely to get not just proper treatment but even help with their mental health, hence more women get medicine?
/r/MensRights08/05/22 09:03 AM
42

Imagine living in a patriarchy where mothers can not just forbid fathers to be in their children's lives but straight up abandon them and hide them in the system just out of spite. Something doesn't add up in this concept.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 08:47 AM
33

Every time people list what women couldn't do "back in the day" they always "forget" that 99+% of men also couldn't do it but they also had more dangerous responsibilities. The whole "even the poor man was a king in his own household" is just a degrading myth with no verifiable proof supporting the claim, not to mention even if you find examples, you can't extend that to an entire population, especially knowing that only the negative word gets around, the ordinary isn't and has never been newswo…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:53 AM
1

Nobody's born with this kind of entitlement, but they do observe it and figure out how to use it, and in your case it seems it's also taught to her.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 01:17 AM
6

I'm pretty sure pointlessly killing people isn't part of masculinity. In fact masculinity traditionally dictates the protection of the weaker.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 01:01 AM
4

The problem is always wildly differing moral standards. Here. Circumcision is against human rights. It conflicts with at least: Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment Freedom of thought, belief and religion Freedom of expression Easy to see why, a body part is cut away due to superstition or as a cosmetic treatment, it's irreversible, causes permanent changes to the remaining parts of the penis and the kid has no way of protesting against any of it. Paper abortion is more proble…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:21 PM
32

*disinformation. Misinformation implies misunderstanding, there's no such thing among the ideas that radical feminists push.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 12:23 PM
6

The appendix used to have a purpose but even today it doesn't cause more harm than anything else in the human body when it misbehaves. The foreskin on the other hand still has its main purpose: to protect the most sensitive body part, and it never causes infections. Really, the only way for the foreskin to contribute to an infection is if you put your dick into things it's not supposed to be in. The human body is very adept at cleaning itself from its own secretions and those are the only intern…
/r/MensRights02/05/22 06:41 PM
12

Also, even in that patriarchy a man who wasn't the head of a house, especially a house with political power, didn't have it better than women. And they definitely weren't oppressing women; men were just as oppressed by the top classes, in that regard most people actually had true equality among themselves: nobody had anything (although there were plenty of exceptions throughout history under monarchs and a variety of other type of leaders who did do a good job in distributing resources and peopl…
/r/MensRights02/05/22 06:03 PM
73

"Cleanliness" has nothing to do with this, the foreskin evolved as a protective layer much earlier than humans had any concept of being clean. That couldn't have happened if it was enabling infections left and right.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 03:59 PM
26

In one of the articles a woman claimed she "felt" a man's eyes on herself, so probably it doesn't matter, just like getting consent from women doesn't matter since even feminist lawyers argue they should be able to revoke it after the fact.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 09:09 PM
26

Women create a problem that cannot be solved from something that shouldn't be a problem, some men find a solution anyway, thus women conclude it's somehow patriarchy endangering men. The mental masturbation they put into making up anything to be able to shout patriarchy from the rooftops is just extraordinary. Also, try to point out how pointless, off-putting, dangerous or even self-destructive many of the plastic surgeries women opt in for are and you're instantly misogynistic because it's thei…
/r/MensRights01/05/22 01:34 PM
2

As a man who has BPD and knows very well how massively it fucks your behavior and judgement up without treatment, it is incredibly damaging that people argue even about its existence in such a high profile case. That said it is very true that women are diagnosed with everything to help them (in or out of court) while men rarely get that chance. When mental health is used as protection for one group and weapon against another, that IS a problem. However straight up claiming something doesn't exis…
/r/MensRights30/04/22 11:30 AM
35

Because he's facing a woman in court, and not just any woman but an abusive, manipulative, gaslighting and arguably crazy one. That's four conditions feminism doesn't want to acknowledge about any woman, no matter the circumstances, and at least one condition it doesn't want to acknowledge about a man: being the victim of a woman.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:30 PM
10

Which royal family, the one with Queen Elizabeth II on top?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:53 AM
1

Where did this come from? Also "gender nonconforming man" ...I'm pretty sure gender nonconforming was meant to mean they're not a man or a woman. It won't change biology but it's funny how everybody keeps conflating gender and sex, at least when it's about biological men, no matter how much they claim only gender matters.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 11:17 AM
4

No, because even the most devout gender rights advocates conflate gender and sex when it's about biological men.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 11:15 AM
1

Gender noncomforming would be somebody who moves between being cis and trans with everything in-between at will.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 11:10 AM
43

Basic human rights is a good idea. Sadly just an idea, and a controversial one nowadays.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 01:57 PM
8

If it wasn't disturbing, extremely concerning and an open invitation to abuse yet another law, it would be funny how women think they can differentiate somebody looking in their general direction and somebody staring at them with a "sexual nature" because they're somehow perfectly objective and unbiased. Some people really ran with the idea that somebody can feel others looking at them, which is total bullshit, and totally ignores how people very often perceive others around them as if they were…
/r/MensRights23/04/22 10:37 AM
8

Nah, women can argue you're only wearing those to stare and report you automatically.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 10:15 AM
19

Or just don't drink and drive?
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:53 PM
1

It doesn't matter where it comes from but it has to come from somewhere, the family has to have a single name. Some people do hyphen their names but that's also not a solution for everybody since you can't just keep attaching names on names as some royalty from the middle ages.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 03:12 PM
2

And whose name will the children get? If they can't agree on a family name by marriage, they won't agree on it later, either. And that potentially signifies a much deeper problem with a relationship where people want to be independent in a family. That's not how it works and the idea is one of the leading causes of divorce. People aren't willing to compromise even the slightest and find common grounds, bad for everybody and horrible for the children. If somebody doesn't want to be married, just …
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:49 PM
35

The patriarchy strikes again to oppress women and... oh, wait, it's women who aren't just getting away with but also benefiting from raping boys even to this day, and not in some backwards, isolated part of the planet but in the first world. What was that about rape culture, dear feminists?
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:18 PM
36

Every man being forced to go into war and a military isn't being a voluntary service with high standards about who they accept is even the reason the front lines end up having criminals and deranged people. Nobody denies that they're out there, but everybody denies that the issue is conscription. However enabling the occasional sadists to do whatever they want doesn't disprove the fact that not a single man has real human rights as recent events and official claims from all across the world have…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 09:48 AM
0

But that's the thing, in the feminist version women have to have the ability to revoke consent at any time, so giving prior consent for a period when they cannot revoke consent doesn't qualify as consent according to the current feminist views, and a rape allegation in that scenario would hold up against a man if a woman made it. In fact the woman it's happened to wouldn't even have to claim anything like that, she could be okay with it but other women would call the guy a rapist anyway and say …
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:46 AM
6

It's in the post, they talked about waking the other up, not doing whatever they wanted to the other while sleeping. Not to mention feminism pushes the "consent can be revoked at any time" so hard they actually had some women think they can revoke consent even after the fact. In that framework, as in consent can be revoked during the act, you literally cannot consent to something that's happening to you while you're asleep even if you consented to it before going to sleep because you cannot have…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:31 AM
0

If it happened to a woman, women would shout RAPE from the rooftops even if the woman gave full consent to not just getting woken up but anything, because while asleep, you cannot revoke consent. That's the major talking point nowadays, not what you agree to prior. They also often say that even saying yes to something doesn't mean consent by women if there's no "enthusiastic participation" or something.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:31 AM
17

Things like men generally not crossing their legs while sitting down, or at least closing their knees. It's incredibly how that became a problem in the minds of some women.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 06:12 PM
11

If boys are told enough times that everything they do is wrong, their sex is bad, their interaction with girls is inherently abusive, their self-discovery and self-expression during puberty is evil, they should be more like girls as they're meant to see them (while in reality girls just become really self-entitled and narcissistic seeing this and by being put on the pedestal whatever they do), they share the responsibility of a few criminals because they are enabling them only by being male, the…
/r/MensRights16/04/22 06:03 PM
11

So they want to make misogyny a hate crime while claiming every man is a misogynist... of course they don't want to reduce men to second class citizens, who would even think that?
/r/MensRights16/04/22 05:57 PM
2

Well that really depends on how old the kids are now.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 10:08 PM
1

I mean, at the age of 33 as a man I wouldn't want a woman with the age of 21 or 52 for example. How's that a problem? I know what you're referring to (and it's not exclusive to men), but those are the outliers, most people expect a similar level of maturity from their partners. What you see with mostly famous people is pretty much a business transaction and/or a publicity stunt, and there's a reason why they get a divorce every other year.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 08:18 PM
1

Preferences are, but the expectation that your preference for your partner will fully carry over to your child is the best way to get disappointed big time.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 08:16 PM
13

Preferences? Yes. Preferences rooted in total misunderstanding and willful ignorance about how things work? No. If she ever found a tall man with looks she deems good and ended up with an average looking son, maybe full of acne and not taller than she is, who would she blame? Of course the man, as if somehow he had any say in it.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 08:38 AM
19

It's not just shaming you for your preference, it's shaming you when you don't meet their preference and make up bullshit to justify why something you can't control--and in most cases isn't even out of the ordinary--makes you less of a human. Total idiocy.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 08:25 AM
10

Because society closes its eyes, puts its fingers in its ears and goes "la la la la" every time somebody shows what happens to men by the tens of thousands in war. But women flee, everybody's readying the pitchforks. Same when men want to flee and but for other reason. The UK being the worst offender currently, calling mostly the sick, the disabled and the elderly men who were allowed to leave but don't have a family human traffickers who they have to protect women against. This shit really show…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 11:31 PM
12

It also says this will stop human trafficking, they're literally targeting single men by claiming they're criminals, otherwise they'd be dying in the Ukraine. Makes it worse that only really sick, disabled and old men are allowed to leave the Ukraine.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:34 PM
28

Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the £120m scheme would "save countless lives" from human trafficking. Yeah, because all single men are criminals apparently. What the hell happened to the ideas from a few decades ago of society becoming enlightened in the future and all humans being equal? Not to mention the Ukraine only allows really sick, disabled and old men to leave. Sure, some may find a way out regardless but most can't, and now the Ukraine's even threatening them with prison if they don'…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:32 PM
1

Men are largely to blame for this. I figured it out in my early 20s. You've got men in their late 20s to early 30s still putting the pussy on a pedestal It's not entirely men's fault, women are just as responsible for enabling and encouraging this though process, and as you pointed it, they gain more than men from this. The lack of education is also to blame, sex ed is important (at least where they have it) but without pairing it with valid relationship advices, it can easily perpetuate the ide…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:18 PM
3

Men aren't more stable, we simply suppress more because either nothing's ever taken seriously when it comes from a man or things are taken out of context and suddenly you're evil.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 10:38 AM
10

Many have been returning voluntarily and a lot of non-Ukrainians also went there to fight. A lot more actually but they turned most of them down because they didn't have a serious military background. So if that wasn't good enough, how will random people who never even held a gun and weren't willing to go back yet fare in that shitstorm that's going on over there? They won't win, they won't survive, and nobody will remember them, they're already shaming them left and right. Maybe even their own …
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:19 PM
3

I mean they're doing fairly good resisting considering that what we though of being the second best military on the planet invaded them. Russia can really only take over the entire country if they launch nukes at them, but that would start WWIII. Or if China steps in and helps them, but so far they don't really lean towards that option.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:10 PM
3

If the the UN won't press for sanctions, other countries won't threaten the Ukraine with stopping the shipment of weapons and aids, mandate foreign volunteers to leave the country immediately and extend official refugee status to the people threatened by this unless they forget about even trying to make this step, then men not having any human rights will be officially proven and sanctioned even by the UN. Who is of draft age by the way? Under martial law they can lower that considerably. Also, …
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:01 PM
23

Probably because feminists always claim they care about equality and what men or people in general have to say about issues involving men, but in practice they never allow anything that's not about women or how men are wrong.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 02:09 PM
20

Fun fact: not everybody has a school of lawyers behind them and the ability to pay people off left and right. Those people are the outliers, not the norm.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 07:00 PM
10

Nope, this isn't the place for this kind of hate.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 04:07 PM
0

That's just a fad. Experimentation and telling people publicly that they're attracted to women because it became a trend doesn't mean there's actually more bi or lesbian women out there than before.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 02:08 PM
12

Get that painting out of there before those misandrists burn it
/r/MensRights12/04/22 01:44 PM
10

Actually it goes back to ancient times, the idea has always been that the less value a soldier has, the less liberties and self expressions they're allowed to have.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 01:27 PM
7

The idea in most military organizations is that they make a blank sheet out of their soldiers who become malleable and can be formed into whatever the military needs. That starts by taking away basic liberties and any ideas of self expression. Going forward from there the more valuable you are, the more self expression you're allowed to have, but the average foot soldier has no more value than cannon fodder. However current society is only fine with it if it's happening to men. There's no real p…
/r/MensRights11/04/22 01:07 PM
1

That's actually good news. It's honestly scary that people are trying to prove that the Hungarian PM was right about people in the west trying to push gender change on minors. They fucking are trying to do it, that's a huge nope. Nobody should be allowed to alter the body of a child that's unable to have a fully informed consent on the matter.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:49 PM
10

Because the justice system has a lot of faults and people end up being convicted wrongfully all the time. The US acts as if this problem didn't exist and follows the mob mentality that lead to things like witch hunts in the past a bit too much even today. Also, people who can never return to society to lead a normal life get locked away for life, it makes no sense to punish people legally for a period then have random strangers punish them indefinitely, something that continues even if you got w…
/r/MensRights09/04/22 01:33 PM
4

This content is not available in your country/region. I hate borders on the internet.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 09:35 PM
1

My advice you go read more about the Abrahamic religions. Eight years of reading it was enough. There is not a single evidence to any higher power. Science describes how the world works around us, it cannot describe anything we've never observed. Even theoretical physics that really goes deep into quantum mechanics only describes how something we know for a fact exists could work at its core. Religious logic however falls into the "you cannot disprove it, so god exists" and "you cannot explain t…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:10 AM
1

I think OP wrote the interpretation of the book and not the claims the author had, so e.g. "hooks explains that all feminism is radical feminism" doesn't mean she wrote this claim, it means you can learn this from what she wrote.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:56 PM
13

Central Europe: crickets
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:12 PM
1

That's an underlying problem with how men are perceived in general. Until the feminist narratives about men being dangerous especially around children don't go away, it doesn't matter how many proves them wrong, the news will still focus on that one male pedophile who gets through occasionally and downplay every issue women are causing in schools, no matter the severity. More men also wouldn't change women's approach, we don't see it happening anywhere, on the contrary. Perception has to change,…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:18 PM
8

Nobody says the baby isn't human, scientific facts say the fetus isn't a sentient human yet. And religion disagreeing and talking about a soul owned by an old man in the sky should not be part of legal decisions.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 03:37 PM
1

Affirmative action is never a good idea, it only generates divide what we're seeing right now with women being preferred all the time and pushed into positions they either don't want to be in or aren't necessarily the best qualified people since the requirement of entry was much more forgiving. Equal opportunities doesn't need it anyway, affirmative action isn't helping it, only if you want equal (or as feminists would define it female dominated) outcome. Let people do whatever the hell they wan…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 01:06 PM
7

I can already see blind men getting reported because "they couldn't see, but they certainly imagined it, that's technically rape"
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:59 PM
5

Don't stare through them, then you're also imagining how they'd look naked, that's a felony now /s
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:58 PM
10

Next up: men wearing sunglasses only to stare at women thus sunglasses for men are getting banned. The blind? They'll have to wear a sign in their necks so feminists can feel safe.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:56 PM
3

Wasn't it a crime already, at least in some places? It's just another weapon against men that can be used without the need to prove anything.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:49 PM
2

Exactly. This is just meant to take the responsibility off of women even without a divorce.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 03:35 PM
2

The fuck?
/r/MensRights05/04/22 10:09 PM
24

The entire existence of feminism relies on their conspiracy theories, so no. They're like an authoritarian government that stays in power because they convince their supporters that there's a big bad enemy just beyond their borders and only they can protect everybody. Really strange that people in general agree that it happens all the time, but when it comes to ideologies, especially this particular one, they don't see the forest from the tree.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 12:48 PM
8

Also no psychiatrist ever acknowledges anything as mental illness if it comes up suddenly and disappears without a trace after a violent crime, except feminist psychiatrists when they talk about women. If there is psychosis going on during PPD, that has to have an underlying cause already there with symptoms before and after, depression alone is far from it. If it was something they claim it is, society would've compensated for all of it with women being the ones most vocal about promoting it; w…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 01:54 PM
15

They're implying that since there's allegedly a patriarchy (the actual conspiracy theory in this case), men judges not punishing women for their crimes is progress since they wouldn't punish men, either.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 01:19 PM
11

it's not a global conspiracy.....look you may not agree with the sentence. When even the UN lobbies for countries to change their laws to not incarcerate women, and women only, for almost anything, it's not a theory anymore.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 01:15 PM
16

That depends on where you live, $40 would be a massive overkill in Central Europe.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 08:38 PM
14

More, they also hate women who get along with men, and especially the ones in a happy relationship.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 06:27 PM
404

That's a regular day over there, they have a hate campaign for everything related to men
/r/MensRights03/04/22 03:58 PM
1

I just wouldn't like the uncertainty. After you move on with your life because you were denied either to be a father or to be able to confirm that you're not, some unnecessarily one-sided and short-sighted law shouldn't be able to bankrupt you. Also we don't know what she's claiming, only what appears to be the case. If she can't "change her mind" later that's good, but I'd be worried that she'd be able to or will be able to in the future. Also paternal instincts can kick in if you suspect you m…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 05:47 PM
1

In the case of OP it definitely comes off as confusing emotions coupled with either fear or despair originating from paternal instincts
/r/MensRights02/04/22 05:38 PM
20

But she could claim it in let's say 16 years, with demanding back payment and compensation for missed child support if she ends up raising the kid alone. The laws won't get any better as time passes, just worse, who knows how far feminists will take it. Not being certain that you're not a father is a high and increasing risk in today's society.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 09:06 PM
8

Also in the few female prisons that are out there (where no man can enter), as if putting rapists and generally violent people (rape isn't always about the need for sex) into a situation where they can rape others with minimal to no consequences or hiring them as guards of others would be a bad idea.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:08 PM
26

Fun fact. In the USA at least it was illegal (or at least socially unacceptable, but I think I read about it being illegal, too) for men to be topless for a long time. Check any old picture (or any other depiction of men) from the beach, every man has a shirt on. It wasn't just a fashion. Men being allowed to be topless now is progress, not misogyny. Women not being allowed is prudery, most women wouldn't support it, no matter if free the nipple movements pop up from time to time; and as far as …
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:46 PM
11

In my country the left line of the motor bus is reserved for the women If you substituted women with black people or any other group, really, you'd have a nation-wide riot on your hands. Strange how people are still okay with segregation as long as you convince enough that it's for their own good, regardless of the argument.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:37 PM
3

They want all the control over the gender conservation You mean conversation?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:15 AM
3

They know, they just want the not yet indoctrinated women to feel better about themselves before they can turn them radical.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:13 AM
4

Feminism caring about men or equality, the lie of the century. Nay, two centuries.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:08 AM
8

That's just as stupid as saying that you're transphobic if you don't want to date trans women, even if just not all of them. Doesn't matter if many of their faces without makeup looks exactly like men's, many sound like men, the body of many of them is shaped like men's, many of them have and want to have a penis, etc. As if you could just turn off your heterosexual preferences because somebody else feels they're a woman inside. On one hand they hate when somebody tells them they could change th…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 08:43 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No\_true\_Scotsman
/r/MensRights30/03/22 08:36 AM
2

https://np.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/tqawbg/if_they_are_so_invested_in_making_endometriosis/ They're saying more than it isn't worth it.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:01 PM
21

Of course any kind of sickness in a relationship will affect both parties, you'd think it's common sense that understanding how a partner is affected is something we should really know. In a healthy relationship people work through issues they face but the less people know about how to approach when a partner of a sick person gets overwhelmed, what said partner can do for their own mental health, the more couples will separate and everybody will say that men are just evil and only care about one…
/r/MensRights28/03/22 09:12 PM
4

Plea bargains happen because the accused whose guilt often can't be proven is presented with a single 99% outcome (41 years in prison in this case) with the plea being the single alternative. It has nothing to do with anybody acknowledging guilt, it's the justice system forcing them into it.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:34 PM
2

Judges have the right to treat any hearsay as evidence regardless of the source, and if it's a rape allegation, they definitely will.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:25 PM
9

Some people don't deserve the right to be parents, these two walking pieces of misandry definitely don't. Also, somebody take that kid away from them before they start turning him into a girl in a year or two only for him to commit suicide at the age of 11.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 11:55 AM
9

Close to? It's so far beyond you can't even see any good anymore.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 11:53 AM
1

I don't believe for a second that there's anything unscripted going on there, ever, even if they say it wasn't. The Oscars is fake to the core, always has been.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 11:44 AM
5

It means men should express more of the feminism-approved set of emotions that revolve around making women feel better about themselves; like be excited all the time when a woman thinks of something to do; show sympathy when a woman feels down, but not too much sympathy, don't ever take away the spotlight; show remorse if a woman thinks you made a mistake, doesn't matter if you did; be happy that you can be in a relationship, that's all that you should need even if you're abused in said relation…
/r/MensRights27/03/22 01:36 PM
1

They rarely happen. Except when they happen all the time and even lawyers of women encourage it, but they're not counting that.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 01:35 PM
1

I don't think we're talking about the same thing. I was referring to the basic behaviors of e.g. objectifying, catcalling, staring, grabbing and generally being a creep. That's not gendered, only their perception and consequences.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 01:45 AM
2

Because the lies of feminists. Society moved from anything that wasn't serious or meant to be harmful being not a big deal and things moving from there to pretty much everything having the possibility to be construed as sexual harassment, but feminists prevented the new norms to be applicable to women. They even went further and encouraged women to take advantage of it, hence why nowadays ridiculous things like noticing a shirt obviously designed to be noticed is sexual harassment if a man looks…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:21 PM
-2

Women harass men pretty much the same way men harass women when either feel they can get away with it. There's nothing gendered in this, the only difference is that men may find more women attractive than women find men. Only feminists made up that all men are rapists or wanna-be rapists and all women are victims, and turned a lie into the most successful conspiracy theory in human history, the idea of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 07:46 PM
6

After successful tests in mice, the researchers hope to begin human trials in the second half of the year Fucking misleading, maybe even ill-natured clickbait. That's literally 0% effectiveness so far in humans with every other variable totally unknown. So far none worked and once the side effects were too severe to greenlight it, somebody almost died. We should wait with any celebration, there's plenty of plans but zero positive results.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 12:49 PM
11

This post has reached one of our comment/karma limits. The text of the post has been preserved below. Is that a not so covert code for "deleted, we don't want this talked about"? I could believe an auto-lock after ten thousand comments or something but not deletion after 963 comments and 2546 upvotes.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 08:56 PM
1

"Unnecessary" can be redefined, for example the medical supporters of circumcision pull out anything from their asses to claim why it is necessary and they're winning the argument still. Even how I wrote it is too weak to hold up but I don't speak legalese.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:17 PM
6

Not just surgery, any medical treatment to change how the body works naturally to fulfill a preference. Nobody will operate on a minor but they will pump them full of hormones if the wokes have their way. They shouldn't even be allowed to delay puberty of a kid, that's just as bad. Even adults change their minds from time to time after starting to transition, a kid has no chance to figure things out if they start messing with them.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 01:51 PM
22

People treat pets better than the feminazis treat boys and men.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 01:47 PM
4

Feminazi is a much more accurate word for this person as it should be.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 01:43 PM
0

If my lawyer acted even remotely impartial, I'd fire him in a heartbeat. A lawyer is a true representative of his client. He should act with extreme prejudice in that regard. Impartiality is the absolute last thing I want in a lawyer. Impartial: Treating all rivals or disputants equally; fair and just. Prejudice: Preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience. I.e. you don't want somebody fair and just, you want somebody who ignores the facts and represents you like that. …
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:30 PM
0

Representing clients != lying. If a lawyer defends somebody who broke the law and it's a fact, it's not the lawyer's job to twist out facts and misrepresent the truth to not have them punished, it's their job to defend them from unreasonable punishment and other mistreatment before and during the trial.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:27 PM
0

That makes you part of the problem.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:44 AM
72

The problem is that too many people act like being a soldier and going to war is something noble, even the depiction is like that, every time they show damage and female/child casualties they also say how "brave and noble soldiers" are fighting against the enemy. They glorify the situation but the men dying are just numbers, nobody shows how they're torn to pieces by explosions, how shrapnel impales them and they slowly bleed out, how they get buried and half-crushed by rubble and they die alone…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:38 AM
28

Legislators have always been above the laws and they always do the shit that benefits them most, doesn't matter what gender they have.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:20 AM
4

Yeah, but most people don't have to care about strangers, it's lawyers who's job, in theory at least, requires being impartial and only caring about making sure court proceedings are just for everybody.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 08:04 PM
6

Brainwashing usually starts early
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:21 PM
29

Of course they do, there's not enough sexual harassment going around (not that staring for a few seconds should qualify in any sane civilization) even after they redefined it to include pretty much everything to support the narrative that every man is a rapist, so they have to pump up the numbers of their statistics somehow. They also enjoy it until they believe they can get away with it, which is 99.99% of the time.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:19 AM
2

Being proud of something pretty much means that you achieved something others didn't, you're better than others in some way. The proud women think they're better than men, and probably they were told so since birth by feminist propaganda. Don't be a proud man or woman, it's not a competition even if feminists are trying to make it one with rigged results.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 02:20 PM
193

will not include even one urinal as they claim to be designing only for perfect gender neutrality. These people are insane and that's such a bullshit excuse. Also men won't sit down on the toilets, the only thing they'll achieve is more smell and less hygiene as tiny urine droplets will splash everywhere.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 02:42 AM
1

The easy solution would be to eliminate sex-based differentiation in sports and group people who can compete with each other based on physical abilities, not unlike the weight classes in boxing. But somehow I doubt women want an easy solution.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 02:20 AM
4

The feminist goal is to make it impossible to find women guilty of any crime, they already convinced the UN to keep calling for countries to change their laws.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:07 AM
3

By not sending aid to countries that do it. For example if the Ukraine didn't get anything when they declared martial law and had men conscripted at gunpoint, they would've very quickly let everybody who wanted to leave go. Wouldn't have made much difference, most people stayed behind willingly and a lot went back to fight, but human rights should always be preferred over any citizen responsibility, if you have any exception, even the entire idea means nothing. There's also countless other ways …
/r/MensRights18/03/22 06:07 PM
6

The problem isn't conscription being unequal, the problem is its existence. I don't care if somebody wants to become a soldier but nobody should be forced to and all the arguments defending it and saying how it's necessary are just glorifying war and treating it as a rite of passage, while also totally ignoring the major human rights violations it entails.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 02:08 PM
10

This is r/pussypassdenied
/r/PussyPass18/03/22 01:52 PM
3

Apparently I'm also banned, but never gotten any message about it. Reddit has a very serious problem with discrimination and also turning a blind eye most of the time when certain "protected groups" promote something highly unethical, or even illegal sometimes.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 07:19 PM
7

That's some incredible fear mongering, associating both men who want equality instead of feminism and men who don't or can't get sex with domestic terrorism.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:42 PM
1

So are you saying that the WGTOW Wikipedia page got deleted by Google? Because it doesn't exist, Google can't show a result that's not on the internet. Wikipedia has "Feminist separatism", they literally redirect search results there and it's pretty much what you'd expect from Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 01:33 PM
18

Exactly, the draft goes against basic human rights that are supposed to be inalienable even during war.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 01:18 PM
11

It's perfectly logical that couples can divide everything based on who has time for what next to their work they can't skip on. The problem is that many people draw their views from radical feminist ideas that want the impossible from men, be around all the time but also be able to financially support the family all alone.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 02:58 PM
1

More like the top results of the search do that, Google doesn't have a say in what they say.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 02:15 PM
16

Meridianbet donated packages of cosmetics for personal care to every women patient in St James Hospitals all around Malta. Ah, yes, that's exactly how you promote equal opportunity and make working conditions better for all medical staff, give women more cosmetics. How can people never see the massive dissonance between what feminists say and what they do?
/r/MensRights12/03/22 11:37 AM
66

Especially when every man is considered a combatant
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:13 PM
7

As a man in therapy I can safely tell you that women either avoid men in therapy or use and abuse them. If a woman is "attracted to" and seeks out somebody with either a mental illness or just enough problems to warrant an actual psychological or even psychiatric treatment, she either has some disturbing fetish or ulterior motives.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 06:08 PM
6

Never. Feminism builds on a conspiracy theory that essentially says that every man is the enemy of every woman and if you claim otherwise, you're just trying to gaslight others, their supporters don't even look at any evidence. Conspiracy theories are impossible to eliminate, look at flat Earthers for example. There's overwhelming evidence proving that the Earth is round, you can explain it to a small child and they understand, but flat Earthers are still out there. Feminism with their patriarch…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 06:32 PM
23

If there was a reaction, it would be applause all over by feminists and whoever didn't realize yet that feminism is as far from equality as it can be.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 05:56 PM
61

It doesn't even have to be her to accuse you, any other woman saying you take advantage of her can be sufficient to fuck you up. Women told women to be irrationally afraid of men so much that men now have to be really cautious around women because many overreact and many take advantage of everything to mess with men. Feminists used divide and conquer, and it worked.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:34 PM
7

If it's a criminal case, you know the student was not 18, so it's statutory rape at best. Just saw another story where a man did something similar with a girl and nobody was shy to call him a rapist and call the incident rape despite him not getting sentenced for rape specifically.
/r/PussyPass06/03/22 03:50 PM
25

One reason "nobody" cares is the same old shit, men are expendable. The other reason is that NATO wants this conflict because finally they can destroy the Russian economy. If however anybody admitted that the Ukraine violated basic human rights, 1, nobody would be allowed to help them and 2, by extension they'd admit that every country that has any form of draft also violates basic human rights, and so does martial law.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 05:39 AM
54

And after the war is over and the surviving but mentally broken soldiers who were forced to fight reunite with their families, again their girlfriends/wives/daughters will be the "most affected" by "aggressive" men who "lost control." The physically also broken soldiers will be lucky if they don't end up homeless. Nothing shows more how men don't have values or rights as humans by default as a war.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 12:50 AM
2

Karen alert. This reads like it's coming from a woman with serious anger management issues and a decent dose of narcissism.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:33 PM
9

This is the rhetoric that all successful straight men are using and abusing everybody around them, otherwise they couldn't be successful. There's no logic behind it, it's a fallacy of composition. They say a few men are like that therefore men as a group are like that. And if you prove it wrong, they just move the goalpost so far it disappears.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:41 AM
21

Anti-male heterophobia, nuff said. By the way, bullshit like this is among the reasons the far right is so powerful in many places in the east (and gaining momentum in the west), they point to these "analyses" and say "see, America wants to make everybody gay and trans" and people, especially people who don't speak English and/or their only view into the west is what their government tells them, eat it up. Hungary literally made laws pointing at "studies" like this to ban the depiction of homose…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:14 AM
3

If she can't find somebody while putting in that much effort, that tells a LOT more about her than any man.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 09:37 PM
24

I don't think they're unusual, I think feminists are simply taking credit for something they didn't do. I'd bet most if not all of the women fighting are not feminists and weren't encouraged by feminism to do it but it will be presented in the west as a feminist success.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:31 PM
13

They can theorize about the person being a tennis player but there's nothing in the body to differentiate it from any other activity that has the same results, like squash, and the more time passes between an athlete retiring and dying, the less conclusive they can be.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 08:58 PM
10

They can't identify athletes, they can identify wear and tear and know what activities could caused them but only theorize about the why if there's no other evidence present.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 07:07 PM
22

In that case female is also a social construct so there's no reason for feminism to exist, right? Just tell girls and women to grow up to be men, like they tell boys all the time instead of helping them with mental health issues or teaching them what to expect during and after puberty. In what universe are these people living in?
/r/MensRights26/02/22 07:02 PM
23

It's not about men who go to fight, it's about men who don't want to die or kill, or can't fight at all being forced there. The majority of them have no chance of survival, many will be sacrificed by their own people because they'd slow everybody down, and the few who do survive will live their lives with crippling PTSD with the occasional missing limbs and no help from anybody, treated as a dangerous psycho and looked down on by everybody after people forget what happened, because they will. Th…
/r/MensRights25/02/22 11:16 PM
38

Well said. And not even every man is equipped to fight and there shouldn't be anything wrong with that. Suspending the most basic human rights makes people doing it no better than Putin in this regard.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 11:09 PM
1

The biggest pussy pass in recorded history.
/r/PussyPass25/02/22 08:30 PM
17

And the UN won't condemn this, even though this, and drafts in general, are just as much of a human rights violation as anything Russia could throw at them. It really sucks that Ukrainian men who don't wanna die or kill are fucked by their own government as well.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 07:55 PM
4

The plan is gaining time and misdirect the enemy, i.e. using them as cannon fodder and decoy. That's always the plan for the people a military drafts in, military strategists are far from stupid to think they can use unprepared and unwilling people for anything important as long as actual soldiers are available.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 05:10 PM
2

Draft is always a possibility. In fact men currently living in countries where the draft was banned already still have to prepare for the possibility because during wartime every government has the right to overrule anything. Inter arma enim silent leges.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 05:02 PM
12

Aside from obviously being among the worst human beings? Women abusing men is empowerment according to feminism, that's what's wrong with them.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:55 PM
3

This sounds like an attempt at making a legalized kangaroo court.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 02:45 PM
27

The problem is that feminists will take credit for any random woman who stays behind, I've already seen articles praising women for "not being afraid of Russian soldiers" (nobody really cares that women aren't a target per se), they may even twist it and say women are willing to protect the country so they don't need martial law to tell them.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 11:47 AM
5

I was raised Catholic and became an atheist. Learn enough about an infallible ideology and you realize it makes no sense at best.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 05:39 PM
11

I get that the women was trying to keep the child safe I'd say she saw an opportunity to be "the hero" by "standing up to a man", didn't really care about the kid. Women can actually mistreat kids however they want in public but other women rarely rush to help. However it happens all the time when kids are with men and nothing indicates anything out of the ordinary. I don't believe it's about the safety of kids. It's not unlike people assuming a black person just robbed a bank or a Muslim carrie…
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:42 PM
22

Not even just the race but also the age. They're omitting a lot and it tells a lot. Also that girl was 18, they only write about her as if she was 13. A man going up to a woman in a coffee shop is a totally normal situation, sometimes marriages start like that. Or at least they used to before being a victim became a goal among feminists.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 03:29 PM
25

So, a man of undisclosed age, not even a hint of him being older so most likely a teen himself or at least not an old guy, tried to talk to a woman in a coffee shop, one of the places where people can do that, and it's suddenly something unimaginable and they talk about the 18-year-old as if she was 13. What the fuck is wrong with these women!? How far can they reach before breaking their backs?
/r/MensRights23/02/22 03:16 PM
20

"Child support" laws, but also when men are forced to keep paying their ex-wives so they can "keep their standards of living" on top of child support or even without children in the picture.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 03:06 PM
6

"poppers" act as vasodilators when inhaled, resulting in a sensation some users refer to as a 'head rush', while also relaxing smooth muscles and facilitating sexual penetration during anal sex. That could very well be considering this part, not that it matters, there's a "she" in the article so they refuse to call drugging a teen and raping him rape.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 06:53 PM
5

That is a textbook case of a rape, how the fuck can't they call it what it is!?
/r/MensRights21/02/22 06:45 PM
27

Because pAtRiArChY ...oh, wait. Men never had reproductive rights, but thanks to feminism even basic human rights are violated. It is illegal, or at least laws that make it possible are in violation of international law, but nobody will ever enforce it because it benefits the politicians responsible for the situation.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 06:43 PM
16

exception, so far, is frozen sperm held privately - and that's only because it is protected by contract law. Not an exception, contracts can be overwritten or nullified by courts, and it has happened already, so that means nothing.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 06:42 PM
1

And people don't understand why the far right has an easy time growing in power; it's a response to all the far left shit like this.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 01:58 PM
10

I am disturbed that victims who have the courage to undergo an invasive examination to help identify their perpetrators are being treated like criminals rather than supported as crime victims If they are criminals, they deserve to be treated as criminals. Getting assaulted doesn't negate a past crime, and really shouldn't. That's a massive pussy pass.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:17 AM
4

I don't think even they know, making sense is never a priority with them
/r/PussyPass15/02/22 07:13 PM
33

Also if she really has access to $300 million still, that's enough to disappear if she wants to, and it's a very high motivator as well.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 06:57 PM
1

You can't, really. Convincing conspiracy theorists that their conspiracy theory is just that is pretty much futile without long education and their own willingness to change their minds. But most of them won't give the ideas up because they give them the belief that they know better than the people around them, they're above them, they're in on some deeper knowledge, some deeper truth than their environment, they believe they see through the lies that misdirect most others, etc. You have to go a…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 01:27 PM
51

Feminist logic is a prime example of the selection bias and they knowingly take it to the extremes to "prove" whatever they want. They also happily use the definist fallacy, false attribution, fallacy of composition, false equivalence, false dilemma, historian's fallacy, kettle logic, mind projection fallacy... honestly you could randomly throw darts into a board with the full list of formal and informal fallacies and more often than not you'd hit one that not just dominates feminist arguments b…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 04:19 AM
15

What? He asked and now that's the problem so much that they bullied him to death? What the fuck!? Also, since when is asking a crime? And how? How the hell do you get consent if asking for it is illegal!?
/r/MensRights11/02/22 12:51 AM
4

That's not true that your search results always differ. Google has the ability to push certain results to the top, like if you search things about suicide, it's likely that you'll find support-related content faster regardless of your search history. I'm pretty sure domestic abuse against women is one of those instances when they push hotlines to the top when it's available based on the location. They may even be legally required in certain jurisdictions to do it.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:14 AM
12

15 is way too young to even be considered for this. Also, this is the shit that allows far-right nationalist governments to claim that the west is forcibly converting children and only siding with Russia and China is the solution to protect them.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:25 PM
2

However, he said: 'If the boot was on the other foot I would be in jail. Maybe even prison. Double standards as usual.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 09:03 PM
0

Human brains have the same parts in the same position that do the same thing. You're referring to brain activity which is totally different from claiming that groups of people have differing brain structures. You won't find a human brain that's evolved not to have an amygdala for example or have the frontal lobe in the back. Those are physical differences. What part of the brain is more active under certain workloads is functional difference. Claiming that we have physical differences is the equ…
/r/MensRights08/02/22 03:04 PM
0

So many people want to see things that humans do in a binary way that only applies to either men or women. Not being able to cope or being an asshole have always been like that, the difference is that today it's okay for a woman to leave if her husband gets sick because "obviously it was too much for her emotionally, poor woman", it's somehow empowering even according to radical feminism, but it's not okay for a man to leave if his wife gets sick because "he's the worst scum of the earth, what a…
/r/MensRights08/02/22 01:34 PM
0

Because there's no structural difference between male and female human brains, not even the article claims that, OP does. Sizes and proportions differ but that makes no difference in how it works as long as it's healthy. People who claim otherwise are the people who claim there are more and less evolved human brains and which one you have depends on sex, race or both.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:02 AM
-1

Only racists and sexists argue that different groups of people, like black people or women, have different brain structures and functionalities. We don't need any of that shit here. Listen to some scientists, not to extremists.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 03:47 AM
-2

There are only size differences, full size or size of parts, but that's not relevant for any healthy human brain, it doesn't change how it functions in any way. It also doesn't depend on any given group, it's pretty much random. Having something too small or missing something do change how it works, but that's not healthy and follows no pattern that could be attributed to any certain group of people.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 11:53 PM
5

Uhm... the actual quote is "Male and female brains in mammals are physically different, and Maffini noted a study that found BPA exposure altered male brains to look more like female brains." That could be true on a very-very simplistic level in some cases, although it's a proven fact that there's no difference between any two human brains. The hormones differ but that's really not the same. The key part is, in fact, about something that kinda acts like a hormone: The chemical mimics estrogen an…
/r/MensRights06/02/22 06:46 PM
5

Well there's no good in men according to modern society so of course they wanna hide or undermine the evidence to the contrary. But if he's really talking about Joe Rogan... now, he's not part of the evidence.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 02:01 PM
47

“We can always put blame on people,” the sheriff added. “When it comes down to it, I don’t think it was appropriate to make an arrest on this at this point. They’ve just lost a child, and it certainly wasn’t intentional by any means.” This American apathy towards children shooting themselves with guns is so fucking infuriating! What the fuck is wrong with people? Immediate arrests and the kids getting taken away should be the bare minimum
/r/MensRights03/02/22 02:57 PM
2

Resorting to the same "tactics" feminists go with by redefining the meaning of words and making up unsubstantiated things will never work out as you can't support any of the claims, just as they can't, but they have a large following, unlike men's rights which is seen as a borderline terrorist organization and really can't afford buzzwords.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:35 PM
-9

I don't really get it, either, however because in context of the previous comment you can't call this toxic femininity, that would imply that there's something feminine about violence.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 05:50 AM
9

Grown ass woman rapes a boy, an actual child: articles explain how it's just a romantic fling. Some idiots catcall a woman online: articles shout RAAAPPEEEE
/r/MensRights03/02/22 04:52 AM
-62

I'm pretty sure there's nothing feminine about beating somebody up, especially like this. Not even humane.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 02:03 AM
3

Unlikely. If feminists and the woke SJWs push their shit far enough, that'll put a lot of ammo into the hands of the far-right and they take over with ease. They're always in a much better position to convince the everyday person to follow them than the far-left, especially if they turn to fascism. Although feminism already took a lot of tips from them. But it worked, so that just supports the point.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:39 PM
4

And they will pay even less when feminists start owning all of them. Not to mention that every time they wanna fill the quota somewhere, that's always management and HR.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:34 PM
153

Most likely he'll kill himself in his teens. Parents who not just force something like this on a kid but do that in the most dangerous way will most likely not care about his mental health. And him being male, nobody else will.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 04:11 PM
2

She could redirect the blame if she was in therapy, got support and even medication, but constantly had men in her life who knew what's going on and kept manipulating her into sex. However she claims nothing like this, no support, no therapy, no medication, no effort on her part to change, only blaming anybody, everybody. She willingly sleeps with men then blames them for taking on an opportunity to have casual sex, which is perfectly normal by the way, casual sex, not blaming others. That's on …
/r/MensRights31/01/22 02:33 PM
4

At the age of 23 if somebody knows they have a problem but they don't even try to fix it, they have nothing to complain about and nobody to blame but themselves.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 02:17 PM
3

One of Reddit's biggest weakness is giving the uneducated moron the authority to silence whoever they want. That's not a weakness, they want to push a narrative and only those people don't ask questions. In fact if Reddit does go public, we all may just get banned permanently even by IP from the entire site.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 02:44 AM
12

It might not be admissible in law It's not if there were laws against it. It could be up to the judge to decide but they can reject it. Which means you can have proof you didn't do something but still get punished for doing it. Aren't legal procedures fun? /s
/r/MensRights30/01/22 12:07 PM
27

However you can't use the recording as evidence if you broke a law to get it. Maybe it's up to the judge in some places or in some cases but they can reject it. Which means you can have proof that you didn't do something but still get punished for doing it.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 12:00 PM
41

If it was a man with the exact same mental health issues, he'd get life in prison or even the death sentence would be on the table.
/r/PussyPass29/01/22 05:47 PM
22

Maybe the fact that you don't strip down or reveal reproductive organs while working out?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:57 PM
13

Specifically transgender women. I wonder what difference would've it made if she said e.g. "no women in men's prisons"
/r/MensRights27/01/22 03:57 PM
15

It is exactly thought policing, the wokes didn't discover some deeper truth about the nature of being human, they just made up different rules for themselves so they can neatly put everybody into a specific box, and you're the bigot if you don't think those boxes should work like that, or exist at all. True, in this case I do think this woman is a bigot, but that's far from a hate crime.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 03:52 PM
26

Off topic, but imagine blocking your website to Europeans because you can't install cookies on their computers.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 07:47 PM
12

Most likely yes, although it is uniquely American in the sense that other parts of the world only practice it due to religious pressure while in the US it's out of fashion, really. It's a very capitalist thing to force an unwarranted, often dangerous, painful and negative side effect-ridden surgery on newborns and convincing their parents that paying for it is in their interest without any other reasoning of some god demanding it.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:39 PM
24

Fun fact: men also have a biological clock that was only discovered very recently because almost nobody gives a shit about men, so men don't even know their own bodies and what they should expect as they get older. They are told by women over and over that men can have children all their life and nothing changes as they age in their fertility. Total bullshit as it turns out, but feminists keep this narrative alive and shame men into thinking natural aging is their fault, it's something they shou…
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:25 PM
1

Well, the patriarchy is a conspiracy theory, what they mean by male ego, too, rape culture as well, you can read a lot into that. Politicians definitely use them as opportunities, but I doubt they created them. Unless you want to count the first leaders of feminist movements as politicians.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:10 PM
7

Something that is obviously such a disgusting and cruel act, that it should be illegal. It should, but if you see every law being used against you, the lack of any law that would make it worse is the only thing going for you. You can and should protest a law that essentially allows people from reporting a crime without the need for any proof and the accused has to prove innocence, especially if it's already a known practice under other laws. It started trending because most likely this was the s…
/r/MensRights22/01/22 04:19 PM
2

Wait, where does this come from? The BBC in that article doesn't claim girls are affected most and boys aren't, however it does talk about both boy and girl victims, the first picture is of the 27th victim. So, are you saying that the BBC is straight up lying and no girls were killed last year?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:29 PM
56

Men: we want the same rights and protections women have in marriage or we don't get involved. Women hearing this: men want to legalize rape! The leaps they make in logic are astronomical. Also, isn't India one of the many countries where rape is legal for women because according to their laws only men can rape? Funny how that never comes up when feminists talk about rape.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 05:59 AM
4

And they wonder why conservatives are moving more to the far side of right each passing year, and have growing numbers. On one side there's feminists and the woke culture pushing for heavy discrimination and unprecedented inequality, on the other side fascists promise a solution by "restoring the norms". Sadly we'll lose either way.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 08:08 PM
1

Actually they are, there are still Christian (and other religious) communities that indoctrinate children from birth and it can be really tough emotionally to break away from them. That said, men and women in those communities are equally guilty of grooming those children.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:32 PM
1

So, she resents men, about 4 billion people (with the majority of them having nothing to do with Christianity, I'd guess more than half most likely aren't even religious) because she grew up in a Christian environment (probably one on the more extreme side from the sound of it) where men and women are equally complicit in grooming children to accept fairy tales as truth and be scared of a non-human big daddy spying on their every move and punishing them if they don't follow ridiculous rules? The…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:21 PM
22

There was a famous birth control experiment a few years ago for men that feminists like to bring up saying that if failed because men didn't like the side effects so they backed out. They only forget two things, about the same percentage of men dropped out early as women drop out from their birth control experiments, and the side effects in this case caused severe mood swings for many, much worse than what women ever have, it got so bad that it caused severe depression and somebody almost killed…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:38 AM
9

Ignorant people can be taught. Willful ignorance is another problem.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:26 AM
19

It's not an overlooked problem, it's an artificially made and upheld status quo.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:22 AM
31

Why do they always forget that there's two people involved in having sex? It's so idiotic that every time this comes up, the argument, from the majority of women essentially is either that men can only rape women (when they argue that only what the man wants happens) or they state, with different words around a twisted logic but still say that women aren't intelligent enough to make decisions for themselves thus can't be held liable for the consequences. And they don't see the problem.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:14 AM
2

It states it doesn't brake their policies then continues to explain the policy that has multiple points (7 out of 9) that tweet clearly violates. Woke and/or feminist logic 101.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:21 PM
52

You don't even have to get married or choose to have children as a man for that to happen.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 03:46 AM
1

Ironic that a sub called blatant misogyny participates in blatant misandry. Not that they'd know what either of those mean.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:21 AM
11

Innocent until proven guilty doesn't mean what you think it means. Even legally from the moment somebody presses charges, the accused is treated as guilty. The "innocent until proven guilty" only means that a judge can't sentence them, it doesn't mean anything else.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 04:07 AM
22

Many men who were falsely accused of rape kill themselves. That's proof enough for any sane person of how traumatic it can be. The rest hate men and want men to suffer, or they're politicians relying on their support.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 04:00 AM
0

However he was (still is?) married and her support worker, i.e. he cheated on his wife and his job specifically forbids building emotional attachment, let alone sexual relationships. She was the one breaking laws and probably manipulating the guy, but that doesn't mean he did not break rules on his part.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 05:00 PM
28

He learned the hard way that contrary to feminist narrative, women who want to ruin men's lives in fact exist, and they start early. On one hand he was an idiot, he's 42 and married, you can't justify his actions, on the other hand reverse the genders and you get a prison sentence with the narrative of a deranged male predator born to abuse women and should be locked up for the rest of his life, said by the judge wishing the laws allowed it. Massive pussy pass
/r/MensRights14/01/22 04:52 PM
6

Not to mention the correct answer is all the time. You don't even have to go far to look for it, it's an extremely common fallacy in a wide variety of arguments, when somebody can't keep up and can't defend their side, they attack the other by accusing them of something immoral or illegal without anything to support the claim. Every other false accusation when e.g. somebody wants revenge for some real or imagined offense is just cherry on top, and even that happens all the time.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:37 PM
3

Wow, they're claiming false accusations are rare yet just a few questions later encourage people to accuse others without any evidence. Brainwashing at its finest.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:27 PM
129

It is, they just rarely enforce the law when women do it because somehow that would be oppressive according to feminism. Although in cases like these it should be a more serious crime than just filing a false police report. There's a difference between misleading the police and ruining the entire present and future life of a person.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 01:40 PM
2

SPLC? Google only finds a dozen definitely not correct things for me.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:37 PM
3

And that's like calling things like free healthcare or any social safety net communist. It works for scaring people but only creates problems for everybody.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:35 PM
2

patriarchy theory Don't call it a theory, that makes it sound like some real thing based on and verified by science. Call it what it is, a conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:30 PM
20

Nobody cares about men, nobody wants to talk about men, making a conversation about men is impossible because "why wouldn't you talk about women instead? You're sexist!", and when you point out that women are talked about all the time and they never extend the conversation to men's issues, you're also sexist. And when you try to talk about an issue that's not gendered, they hijack it and make it about women. I heard a streamer talk about ridiculous statistics that claim things like men take up o…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 01:41 AM
12

They do have the power to influence future laws all around the world, that's a lot more than no real power.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 12:46 PM
3

Ask them how are you the one slut-shaming when they were the ones who called the behavior by two different pejorative terms, clearly indicating that they believe that behavior is not normal. Not that it would change anything, "in the wild" it's just best to avoid these arguments. When people already made up their minds and are only looking for justification, they rarely like any opposing idea. That applies severalfold when it's about any topic concerning the interactions between men and women.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:56 PM
21

Which is worse, that kid did nothing wrong to deserve the punishment of being raised by a huge pile of garbage of a person she is.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:03 PM
1

Straw man much?
/r/MensRights04/01/22 03:59 PM
1

I've never actually heard any liberal of that kind wanting to lower standards on men because of a disparity, they'll rather keep it and argue that men deserve it due to "offenses done by men of the past"
/r/MensRights04/01/22 01:57 PM
85

And feminists still argue that the justice system is way too harsh on women and too lenient on men.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 01:40 PM
1

Having power over other's lives is hard to let go. It's even more concerning that this shit originates from the USA, the only place in recent history where they brought absolute power over a group to the extremes and kept it there for an extended period of time, so long that many still won't let it go. Their hate of black people turned into euphoria many felt from the power over them. It's fucked up that nobody sees the parallels when feminists use the same logic to justify whatever oppressive c…
/r/MensRights03/01/22 12:12 PM
20

Keyword: admit
/r/MensRights01/01/22 06:54 PM
18

Not to mention when boys show clear signs of some mental illness that can lead to suicide later in life like major depression, people, mostly women (from the predominantly female teachers to even their own mothers) just say "man up" and completely ignore it. Men of course don't argue because they grew up in the same female dominated environment that teaches boys that women know it better.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 03:11 PM
29

Feminists reject any ideas of equality and are capable of claiming that women don't reach the same level of brain development as men do if it serves their agendas. And too few seem to notice the egregious flaws in their logic.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 03:51 PM
43

That's since forever. Nobody there cares about children unless it's a good PR, but blaming men is always better even if it enables female child predators.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 03:48 PM
16

Most feminists only care about those "other women" when it's something not related directly to them and they can use it as a red herring to "disprove" some argument. In every other case they completely forget about everybody else.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:54 PM
3

You can't argue with people who can't see the forest from the tree.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:51 PM
10

You literally said that the father should change his behavior for the sake of the kid, but his behavior is being a father to that kid and trying to spend more time with her. If he changes that, he spends less time with her and even then he won't act loving anymore. That's not progress, and it just gives ammo to the mother who's already trying to get the daughter away from him.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 01:26 PM
11

So in your opinion the dad who wants what's best for her daughter should give up on her so the mother can tell the kid "see, your father doesn't even want you, won't even fight for you"? And the kid who's now forced to spend all her time with the parent she doesn't like as much will agree and grow resentful of the father as well. How's that better?
/r/MensRights29/12/21 01:19 PM
16

It does depend on whether it was SMS because there the character limit is 160, if you go over by just one character or use something non-ASCII, that's already two. Still a crazy number, in fact may be worse like that because it can be up to 128k characters, that's over the length of a short story. Basically she would've had to write a novel like that each day. It's more realistic that there was a bunch of one word texts like "die" and shit among those.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 02:37 AM
4

Imagine studying mental masturbation, worse, may even having a career in it later.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 01:51 PM
23

Who said anybody about touching people? The original comment was about staring. Also you really twisted what "the exact same thing" is, because what you're referring to is two different things. Sexual abuse today is defined by feminism as anything that makes a woman think a man's sexually harassing her. Circumstances and intentions don't matter, only what women think, that's how you end up people accusing paramedics of sexual assault when they literally bring back a dead woman but cut up her clo…
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:17 PM
30

Any PWDR, pay-walled, didn't read?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 03:20 PM
109

Yeah, it's incredible how the exact same thing can be perfectly acceptable behavior or sexual abuse based only on how desirable a woman finds a man. Meanwhile what women do to men is always perfectly acceptable somehow regardless of how the men feel about it.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:51 PM
1

Imagine arguing about who's using throwaway money better (yes, throwaway money, the vast majority of people lose on every form of crypto, most lotteries literally have much better chances of giving you both a return and a significant profit)
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:26 PM
-28

It's acceptable everywhere except a few places where men got fed up and did oppress women.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 07:47 AM
16

Narcissism and similar things are only disorders if they significantly interfere with the daily life of a person and/or cause significant distress to them. Otherwise they're just being an asshole.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 07:44 AM
15

Dating in general is openly discriminatory, that's not the issue. Being petty, hateful, paranoid, willfully ignorant and TERF is more like the problem, and it doesn't help that they're so far-right and reactionary it boggles the mind. Also the dating aspect of that sub is just a disguise, they're a hate sub, everybody but them and the Reddit admins agree.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 06:30 PM
11

No surprise there, criminals make up anything to get a more lenient sentence. Maybe finally the legal system should work on not basing the severity of a punishment, or even if there will be a punishment, on somebody's gender (and appearance).
/r/MensRights22/12/21 09:11 PM
4

It's telling about the state of things when even a male med student doesn't want to be left alone with another but female med student. Or maybe being a med student actually makes it worse. I'd definitely say there's more attack surface there. And no, it's not sexism, it's distrust and divide that modern feminism pushes.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 04:31 PM
3

I'm not a legal expert but giving you an advice, whether legal advice or not, that you should hack anything and especially use information got like that to your advantage, is a crime in itself. Obviously doing it is also a crime, but while your lawyer and his assistance probably has a way out, you don't. That could be the reason they're telling you to do it. Malicious all around.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 08:46 PM
22

Indeed, journalists are under no obligation to write in legalese even partially, they only do that when they want to stick to a narrative.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 04:48 PM
2

I wonder if some women cross their legs in the car when not driving and that's the cause... or maybe some forms of crashes pull in or twist high heels somehow.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 08:45 PM
1

That's on par with the argument that safety belts decapitate or cut in half more people than how many they save in crashes.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 08:30 PM
13

That could easily backfire and get him suspended if they side with her and then claim he was trying to enforce his gatekeeping behavior to make it harder for women to enter the field. Every day Modern Educayshun on YouTube becomes less of a satire and more of a reality.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 07:58 PM
80

That's a misleading phrasing, both in the title and in the question. In general people are more worried that boys turn into criminals while they worry much more that girls' needs for feelings, health, education, societal status, etc., are not met. Whether one worry is bigger than the other is irrelevant, both places girls on a pedestal.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 08:26 PM
2

It will only stop when it backfires so bad you'll be asking the same question about whatever comes next... but only internally because publicly you won't be allowed to. When people forget that compromises have to be made in every aspect of life, they put so much ammo in the hands of radicals from the other side of the spectrum that they'll grow huge and take over eventually.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 05:19 PM
1

So, gender and sex are not the same things, and never have been, but the idea that they're completely independent and you can simply go from one to the other is pretty much appeared for the first time in recorded history only in recent years. And that still won't make a woman who's not been surgically and hormonally altered a man as far as her sex goes.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 01:32 AM
2

The first link in it does, in short they found women buried the same way as they think only hunters were. Apparently this wasn't even the first case when an argument could've been made but here there's more evidence than ever.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 04:32 PM
5

Do they understand what universal human right means? They do and they clearly reject the idea.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:57 AM
4

On the other hand only the moderators could pressure the admins to change the rules. Not that it would have any effect unless thousands of them got together...
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:50 AM
7

Long story short Reddit officially confirms they believe some people are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:45 AM
7

The mental gymnastics they can do to justify them are different.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:52 PM
19

Well, if it also applies to girlfriends than men are really not safe from anybody, not even by practicing celibacy.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:50 PM
3

I get what you're going for but this isn't really a men's rights issue, it's a general problem with society who refuses to punish female criminals. This belongs to r/ThisIsFeminism
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:10 PM
1

Learn about fallacies, what they are and how to recognize them. Every such debate will end eventually not by either side coming out of the argument as a winner but by one side going down the rabbit hole of non-sequitur, red herrings and false equivalencies. But when you point it out as it's happening, although you didn't win, at least you didn't lose, either.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 05:19 PM
49

Pretty much the backbone of modern feminism is that "women are and have been oppressed throughout history", yet sometimes feminists are among the people showing how unsubstantiated the claims presented as evidence are, and as a result just further shows how ideas like the patriarchy and half the population oppressing the other half throughout history--ideas that are behind anti-male movements, ideologies, social norms, and even laws--are just a conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 05:04 PM
10

This hits too close to home. Abusive women also have the ability somehow to find men who show signs of untreated mental illness. Which is common considering all you as a man hear as things like "grow up", "get over it", and "man up".
/r/MensRights12/12/21 03:41 PM
9

you may be mother Theresa in your personal life According to many, with actual sources, mother Theresa was a not so great person, borderline con artist, only hyped up because she was a woman.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 08:08 PM
1

It's definitely sexist (and the teacher who reported you is a simp), and a huge double standard since women not just do it but encourage objectifying men, which is actually bad.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 08:01 PM
49

I may be a pessimist but not pointing out that the student was 18 to show it wasn't technically illegal says to me that he wasn't.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 11:31 AM
29

Why do some conspiracy theories become so successful like the pay gap or the patriarchy? Imagine if in a decade you'd be ridiculed or worse for saying the Earth is a globe and not flat.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 04:14 PM
42

Oh, but they (probably not all the doctors in question but feminists in general) want exactly that, getting paid for not working and getting the same praise for it as people risking their lives and definitely lowering how old they can expect to get.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 04:11 PM
92

Ok so all the guys better fucking piss on the floor then. And then they'll call the cops on the boys for sexually assaulting the girls. Standing up and walking out together would be the best demonstration.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 03:47 PM
1

"Drug search" Honestly the US is a fucked up place. In my high school everybody knew weed is sold and kids used it, but nobody ever made restrictive or discriminatory rules about it, or involved the police. They sent a kid home once who was clearly high and they had a stern talk with his parents, but nothing really happened or changed. And this in a country where by law there's no difference between having a single gram of weed or a kg of cocaine on you, both are equally serious crimes. Same wit…
/r/MensRights09/12/21 03:40 PM
2

Yep, it's mostly reality TV and not really movies. Movies follow trends for some time now.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 03:30 AM
43

The difference is that when a woman does kill a child, even if it's the end result of long term physical abuse, she's almost always "driven into it", sometimes they even blame the child. And more often than not it works. It's fucked up that only because somebody's a woman, she has default protection against serious crimes and how the public opinion is swayed in her favor with ease shows the double standards. It's important to point that out, maybe one day people will listen and don't assume shit…
/r/MensRights08/12/21 11:22 PM
9

Yeah, in Hungary the same, 80% of all places only accept women, and the rest cost much more while being considerably worse in every regard from location to actual building condition.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 04:34 PM
2

Doesn't the US military have an acceptable loss of life at any given mission?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:37 PM
7

Fucking simp. Fun fact: fathers dying also destabilizes families, fathers coming home with PTSD and other severe mental health issues destabilizes families even more with how nobody helps them. Edit: Children need two parents, neither is expandable. But you don't have to be a parent, just human to be non-expandable. A politician thinking otherwise should be fired or locked up if they made decisions based on it.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:27 PM
24

Depending on the political views of the judge, it could be a years. Also women who claim men aren't emotionally developed enough and/or don't have enough self control to be nurses would come out of the bushes
/r/PussyPass03/12/21 01:37 PM
126

An unlicensed "doctor" doing anything in medicine and not going to prison is bad enough, but fuck this
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:31 PM
9

“keep your laws off of our bodies” works for men as well
/r/MensRights02/12/21 01:25 PM
11

And way too common
/r/MensRights01/12/21 06:16 PM
168

Feminists: fathers should be present at birth Also feminists: but not when I'm giving birth
/r/MensRights01/12/21 06:13 PM
1

I see it, that site is sexist as hell towards men, but stopping it is impossible without doing the exact same shit women claim men do: forcing something on them, in this case something being education then equal rights AND responsibilities.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 03:09 PM
2

Lawyers are paid to get people off the hook. Not make them likable. No, lawyers are paid, officially, to make sure the trial is fair, not to figure out how their clients should lie to avoid accountability. It also shouldn't be public while things are on-going, that just creates a pressure on everybody in court to lean a certain way.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 06:32 PM
6

Putting attention on the wrong person and getting away with sexism, among other things
/r/PussyPass30/11/21 03:22 PM
9

yet they're fighting an enemy that never was for issues that either don't exist or not exclusively theirs in places that favor women at every level of society It's not it's worse there, it's what they wanna get rid of literally doesn't exist here, or more accurately what they claim they wanna get rid of. What they actually want changes from feminist to feminist with the only common thread being that they all want to divide men and women.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 10:48 PM
66

Definitely, you'd think feminists if their goals were equality, would put all their energy into focusing on places like Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan, yet they're fighting an enemy that never was for issues that either don't exist or not exclusively theirs in places that favor women at every level of society. And even when they do bring other places up, they misrepresent what's happening there all the time.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 09:57 PM
8

Call it what it is, a conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 09:53 PM
5

That's actually a likely scenario, but I have a feeling now that he's dead and can't even try to defend himself, they'll make up anything they can from abuse to child molestation. I can see her crying under oath with huge crocodile tears about how she was treated and what she had to witness, and the only reason she didn't report it is because she was afraid for her children's life. And when the kids say it's not true, they'll drag some "researcher" in to say that the kids just suppressed their m…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:18 AM
31

You don't hear about women admitting they divorce the husband to get sole custody of the kids and alimony, or they found an upgrade(this is usually where the ex is labeled with various faults), etc. Of course you hear about women like that, they're among the celebrated "brave" women.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 01:28 AM
3

Allegedly. Somehow they can never show how every man oppressed and continues to oppress every woman, what the general claim is, they just keep moving the goal post until being born a man becomes offensive then abuse to somebody.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 03:04 AM
1

Just seen this, for a moment I thought it's this sub and was really confused by all the comments making fun of it when I noticed it's nottheonion. This is another problem, not the sub but how people only see the title, which is intentionally something taken out of context and presented in a twisted way, and make up their minds that it's just crazy ramblings. Too many perceive every argument as invalid by using the logic that if the claim is ridiculous, everything else must be, and doesn't even m…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 02:55 AM
79

“This is our space. You’re making this space uncomfortable,” one of two black women told the men as the incident was videoed. “You’re white! Do you understand what a multicultural space [is] … White is not a culture!” she said. That's straight up racism
/r/MensRights22/11/21 05:40 PM
11

She's the summary of what's wrong with our society today. Not just in "women good, men bad" but also getting offended for something imagined and being totally and willfully ignorant about the entire situation.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 05:08 PM
3

Feminists marginalize boys, brainwash them into thinking they have to suppress their emotions and any issue they have is only because they're weak and they just have to "man up", they can't complain, they can't enjoy things, they don't even know how puberty affects them and what to expect, girls are taught about everything and also how to take advantage of that, and when boys get confused, hurt, maybe even break and lash out, feminists shout "see, they're born with the Patriarchy in their blood"…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 10:05 PM
12

Could be the definition of double standards
/r/MensRights17/11/21 02:00 PM
1

You're always allowed to make fun of people in power unless the people in power are fascists.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 11:45 PM
6

So, fixing problems that don't exist by trying to shape half the population into an image from the minds of the other half who don't actually know what they want somehow creates problems? Who would've guessed. Maybe just let men be men, with all the similarities and differences men come with among each other? Isn't that what we're supposed to do with every other gender?
/r/MensRights15/11/21 01:03 PM
2

Not toxic, exploitative and manipulative. Toxic implies unintentional harm.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 06:03 PM
2

Tell her that you don't want to and if she gets pissed off, that's her problem, and if she leaves over this, you dodged a bullet. That would only prove that she wanted to shop around in the next 10 years for the best "match" and forcing somebody, potentially you into paying child support while she can be with whoever else she actually wants to.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 04:52 AM
41

History was cruel to women. History was cruel. What feminists want revenge for is mostly either made up or there's no evidence to support the claims. Men and women were equally oppressed not long ago by men and women on the very top. No education, no rights, no opportunities, no freedom, if you weren't on the top of the social ladder, you were filth and nobody cared what's between your legs. And the patriarchy feminists so like to point to has never existed, only boy clubs that equally discrimin…
/r/MensRights12/11/21 11:28 PM
2

Treat work as work, and coworkers as coworkers. You're not there to socialize or have fun, people around you don't necessarily share your opinions, views, ideals, morality, etc. Set boundaries, that makes everything easier. Does anyone have any advice for how to deal with this (self diagnosed) PTSD that I think I'm dealing with and how to tell a good woman from a potentially dangerous one? Seek out a therapist, you shouldn't struggle with trauma alone. And don't assume you can tell people apart,…
/r/MensRights11/11/21 05:28 PM
2

In most cases when they claim "women most affected" they say men are stronger both physically and mentally to deal with a problem... and they gloss over how that contradicts with EVERYTHING feminists say about differences between men and women under any other circumstance. Basically they're making things up as they go and don't even care for consistency to allow for more colorful stories to tell. And people, men specifically, who notice this but don't choose to ignore it can easily grow resentfu…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:38 PM
3

They're an idiot but sadly that's a very possible outcome.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 05:54 PM
64

Try record conversations if you can. Try record conversations if you're legally allowed to.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 09:17 AM
9

I see the Patriarchy strikes again /s
/r/MensRights06/11/21 08:29 AM
2

The women have insight into their own reprehensible actions, according to the court during the session. They are open to a conversation with the victim. The court therefore finds a community service order appropriate. Reverse the genders and it's several years in prison for two men because of sexually assaulting an underage girl who now has severe trauma that could ruin her life. But these are women and they're willing to talk, so, no biggie, right?
/r/MensRights03/11/21 01:59 AM
12

Go no further if you need proof how sexist (and hypocritical) feminists can be
/r/MensRights03/11/21 01:47 AM
12

also not mature enough to realise that they can ruin someones life by accusing someone of things that never happened. I'd argue that at this point many of them are perfectly aware, they just don't care.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:06 PM
2

The bible no, but its influence does. Many laws were (and are being) made based on it and people are following what is (or what they think is) in it to this day.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:45 AM
6

Cancel culture prevents most men to speak up very easily. Speak up and unless you have a decent support behind you both online and offline, your career is over, you get harassment, death threats, and marked as a sexist among other things with no way of getting out from that hole. Even worse if some known radicals from the right speak up in support of you, people will then associate you with those groups forever, they don't care that there's no connection. Until common sense becomes common again,…
/r/MensRights31/10/21 04:38 PM
6

It's incredible how they can look up at the sky and say "Yep, it's green"
/r/MensRights30/10/21 07:37 PM
4

She may believe only men are part of the problem but the way she phrases things is simply racism and a human rights issue above men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 05:48 PM
44

You can't get to a more basic logic than that, yet feminists still argue against it. All they want is to use physically demanding fields as entry points for cushion-filled management jobs where they can boss men around all day long, meanwhile they endanger the lives of others with people who can actually do the job having to cover for the women who can't.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 04:53 PM
5

That meant that a male applicant who ranked in the fifty first percentile of his gender stream missed out on a job even if he got a better score on his tests than a female. Yay equality /s Feminists are literally playing with people's lives now. All they want is to use physically demanding fields as entry points for cushion-filled management jobs where they can boss men around all day long, meanwhile they endanger the lives of others with people who can actually do the job having to cover for th…
/r/MensRights28/10/21 04:41 PM
1

File a complaint with HR and whoever is responsible for investigating misconduct at your company.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 12:33 PM
26

It's a common practice everywhere, whenever you suspect a shadowban, you have to check a post/comment in a way that the site can't tell it's still you. Even places that don't acknowledge shadowban are doing it, YouTube for example. And I'm not talking about when they limit who they suggest your videos to or whether notifications are sent out, but when your comment doesn't appear for anybody else in a comment section, it could happen for as little as disagreeing with what the video said about som…
/r/MensRights28/10/21 12:30 PM
2

I see the radical idiot's replacement is another radical idiot, just from the opposite end of the spectrum. You know, it's a horrifying thought that in the near future a country under a generally oppressive, racist, homophobic, transphobic, islamophobic, antisemitic and Winnie the Pooh lover government may still have more true equality than the West. Modern Educayshun looks more and more like an accurate prediction than a satire
/r/MensRights27/10/21 03:08 AM
2

You're still sexist, and doesn't really understand how the world works at all. There is nothing inherently female about make up even when nowadays men using it are ridiculed. But that also doesn't mean women are inherently better at making it, because that's stupid and implies that there is a predisposition in skills and the ability to learn. Fun fact, you have to learn how stuff works before you can work, and there's no difference between the abilities of men and women. Plenty of men work in de…
/r/MensRights26/10/21 11:22 PM
2

So, by your logic all the male gynecologists should be fired, right? You can't have a more female-oriented field than that. You're sexist.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 08:13 PM
6

You don't even understand the concept of people who do a better job should do the job, don't you. Fun fact: what's between your legs has nothing to do with what audience you can target with your work, and people not accepting something based on that is plain old sexism.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 04:56 PM
6

Movie and TV studios specifically want to cater to women with children, because mothers like to plop kids down in front of the TV. I don't think that's exactly how it is, at least not just women with children but women in general. However funny that you brought this up since women always argue about men not wanting to be part of raising children or even go on paternity leaves, yet they are the ones constantly making it hard if not impossible for fathers to do that with constant doubt and open ho…
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:51 PM
12

It's not about who the target audience is, it's about who is in the position to influence who gets in going forward. And if people there make decisions not based on merit but anything else, that is a problem. Women accuse men of favoring men all the time with jobs even though they barely can support it with any real evidence, yet the same women have no issue when women favor women with new jobs and the evidence is literally written down on official documents and it's openly advertised that more …
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:19 PM
1

The queen's just a showpiece, she has no real power, not even real influence. There are laws in place that give her a bunch but those are unenforceable and would be the end of monarchy if she tried to use them anyway.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 01:54 PM
39

Is that even a crime, legally speaking, still in the UK? Women stealing stuff. They're the ones trying to decriminalize most if not all crime if a woman does it.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 02:28 PM
41

Nah, you know, grabbing a stranger and trying to kiss them is only sexual assault if a man does it to a woman. Even if the woman didn't mind, others would be outraged for her. Double standards as usual.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 02:26 PM
39

The patriarchy strikes again, am I right? /s You can see how confident she is in all this, as if she had learned that a man can't get away with protecting himself, especially fighting back.
/r/PussyPass25/10/21 02:03 PM
23

Not to mention that being bigger or having more muscles doesn't make injuries any less serious, only some injuries less likely to happen... but those are extreme things like breaking the collar bone. But if somebody claws away 10% of your skin, breaks your nose, hits you in the balls hard enough to give you a decent chance of developing cancer, or just hits you in the same place over and over enough times to cause permanent deformity, it doesn't matter who's the bigger one.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 08:56 AM
14

Go no further than the favorite pasttime of humanity politicians or the aristocrats in the past, wars. The majority of men die or get mutilated and rejected by society upon returning home, "women most affected".
/r/MensRights24/10/21 10:20 AM
-4

You don't actually have to dismantle the justice system because what somebody said or done based on somebody else is hearsay, and hearsay is admissible in any court as evidence. It's literally built into the justice system to be able to use it the same way as hard physical evidence. The problem is that it cannot be eliminated because most criminals who are factually guilty would walk free. Imagine that you're threatened with a gun but nothing else happens. The only way to hold that person accoun…
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:50 PM
2

Well, you start first grade at age 6-7 so in eight grade you should be 13-14. 15 being the majority is weird but not unheard of.
/r/PussyPass21/10/21 12:05 PM
7

You're absolutely right, but depending on the school you may have just asked for suspension or even expulsion. Sadly no joke.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 11:35 AM
3

The entire concept of involuntary celibacy is based on the idea that people owe you sex. No they fucking don't. But of course feminists' entitlement is stronger than common sense and instead of being universally looked down on by everybody as they do with male incels, they want to be celebrated for their "struggles" and literally control how men think so they can get "what they're owed".
/r/MensRights19/10/21 03:36 AM
69

The UK, that tells you everything. Although they still could've ordered mandatory psychiatric treatment if this was in fact part of the conclusion.
/r/PussyPass18/10/21 03:41 PM
5

The news should say: Feminists inadvertently acknowledge an area where women have it easier than men. Also, fuck them. It's pretty standard in literature to have a pseudonym, even an entire persona made up to sell the books. The gender on either end shouldn't matter, and never did matter when women did the same under male names. Also also, I'm pretty sure there are plenty of female authors, even feminists who have male ghostwriters, that's also very very common. Edit: the fancy pants editor is g…
/r/MensRights18/10/21 09:28 AM
50

Indeed. In an ideal world that shit would be just more reason to lock her up, children shouldn't be taken care of by a crazy murderer
/r/MensRights18/10/21 09:17 AM
8

Definitely not. Mental illness isn't your fault, nor the actions you take caused by it, it's a psychiatric condition that often needs medical treatment and if it gets bad enough that you endanger yourself or others, that treatment can be forced upon you. Sexism and the actions you take cause of it is on you. Sexism, racism, antisemitism and all the like are a mixture of fear, prejudice and in a huge part willful ignorance. Even if we call somebody delusional, in reality it's just a large number …
/r/MensRights17/10/21 08:12 PM
37

I'm pretty sure you could say that about people eating in a restaurant in the 1950s in the USA who were personally offended, felt violated and their lives threatened if a black person walked in. But they were still sane people, just racists. Fear is not a mental illness. Phobia is, but fear isn't. And fear turns into hatred eventually, which is a serious problem.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 08:01 PM
18

Replace cisgender men with black men, Jews or Muslims and you'll see why this isn't mental illness. If this was mental illness, white people afraid of black people or Asians would be mentally ill instead of being racist. This is willful ignorance combined with prejudice that's slowly turning into hatred.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 07:52 PM
9

This shit should warrant at least suspension if not expulsion of the people who were "angry, scared and confused" (what you would get if people would start complaining about any other gender), and an investigation into what the hell this college is doing allowing communities to form around sexism and hatred. And don't start with sexual abuse victims, the first thing they learn in therapy is how to accept that what happened to them wasn't the fault of everybody else with the same gender as their …
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:04 PM
115

They definitely aren't, they're just horrible human beings
/r/MensRights17/10/21 05:56 PM
91

Nope, sexism
/r/MensRights17/10/21 05:53 PM
5

That's not how it works. Everybody uses the full capacity of their brain, but the brain's complexity is more or less the same for everybody, and that determines how it functions and what it can do.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 03:04 PM
4

It's always funny when they draw conclusions about an entire group of people from what a few who've been discredited and proven wrong countless times said in the past.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 03:02 PM
16

Women when somebody says men in average are stronger, it's biology: men aren't stronger, that's offensive, sexist, misogynist, hateful! Also women when they attack a man and the man fights back: men in average are stronger, it's biology, they cannot be allowed to fight back, that's offensive, sexist, misogynist, hateful!
/r/MensRights17/10/21 02:55 PM
14

The why is very easy. It's controversial but unlike topics where the majority of people (i.e. voters for politicians they have influence over) agree on the facts and disagreeing deviates from the norm, here the norm is for feminists to disagree, and if you're caught disagreeing with feminists, the backlash is worse than if you were caught saying the n-word while in black face wearing an ape costume.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 02:51 PM
23

It would be MUCH better for her kid if she was locked up. She's not just a criminal but a horrible mother as well. How the fuck is this legal anyway? There should be laws against judges just doing whatever they want. "Most women would be in Styal [women's prison] by now." And most men would die in prison after getting caught over and over.
/r/PussyPass17/10/21 02:22 AM
5

As if the male body wasn't a constant talking point and critique among women... not to mention they're the first to ridicule a man if they don't find him attractive or make jokes about his penis. There's no inherent difference between how men and women think and what they talk about, only the opportunities and circumstances differ, but those favor women for some time now.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 10:41 PM
27

The good ol' treating the symptom, not the problem.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 01:01 AM
4

When I was growing up I noticed that fathers are usually rather distant with their children, especially if they're girls. Not just mine but all of them. Didn't understand it until I became an adult and saw how stigmatized men are around children, even their own. And then women complain that men are distant to children. Well, no shit, Sherlock. Maybe men shouldn't be treated as pedophiles if they show any interest in being a father or just kind to kids, maybe even work with or around them.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 12:07 PM
2

This is part of the feminist narrative that women are always the victim. If they teach women and men that men always want sex (and if you think otherwise, you're definitely the lone outlier and something's wrong with you), circumstances and emotions don't matter to have sex, while women want emotions and circumstances and emotions matter the most (and if you think otherwise, you're definitely the lone outlier and something's wrong with you), there's a clear division between the sexes that helps …
/r/MensRights14/10/21 12:47 PM
14

Strong independent women when talking about rights: We're strong and independent Also strong independent women when talking about responsibilities and consequences: We're baby
/r/MensRights14/10/21 12:34 PM
9

Too many expectations on how 'safe' or 'comfortable' women should feel around me. That's not really on FDS alone but feminism in general. They literally redefined sexual harassment as sexual harassment + "whatever I don't like at the moment and whatever I change my mind about even years later".
/r/MensRights13/10/21 06:52 PM
2

Nobody can live up to FDS standards, even they acknowledge all the time that they view a relationship only as a temporary arrangement to benefit them financially and sexually, and they have to be ready to end it on the first discovered imagined "red flag". Normal women don't work like that at all.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 06:47 PM
2

How dare you expect me to care for my own children and do chores around my own home without paying me for it!? Truly facepalm
/r/MensRights13/10/21 12:09 PM
3

The Noble Prize would lose its meaning and science as a whole would be discredited if they chose to consider gender or ethnicity when awarding it. There's enough problem with positive discrimination in education (and jobs) already. Of course women who get in to certain schools or get certain positions in their jobs not because they're good enough but because there's a quota to fill probably aren't the ones who could get anywhere near a Noble Prize without this. Not to mention that the Noble Priz…
/r/MensRights13/10/21 01:07 AM
1

I didn't say people don't think like that, I just said what it reminded me of.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 05:38 PM
1

A college junior should know better, of course she's in philosophy and English, not history or facts in general. Still, that's far from a kid, she's an adult woman with all her legal rights and clearly a university's support behind her stupidity.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 02:11 AM
1

That's the plot of a Sliders episode. Sure there some sickness killed almost all men but the end result was the same, they hunted down surviving men and put them in farms for breeding.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 02:03 AM
1

There's no line, only whatever women think at any given moment about something. The exact same thing can be the cutest gesture or sexual assault depending on the mood of women.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 02:00 AM
1

Fuck this woman, she's one of the many reasons men started to resent feminism and eventually will resent women. They just can't fucking stop with the hate, can't they?
/r/MensRights12/10/21 01:49 AM
64

Or simply blame postpartum psychosis, which is used as a blanket defense against anybody like her. Allegedly can come without any warning and go without any trace and affects 0.1-1% of every women. The worst thing about it is that people who use it as a blanket defense should realize that if it worked like how they claim, nobody would ever allow women to be left alone with their children in the first few years after birth.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 02:34 PM
6

It always has been an insult in the minds of people who think men, as in all men everywhere in any time, used to be the only group having rights therefor we don't deserve any rights.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 02:13 PM
10

It definitely gives off the wrong vibes and the wrong message if you just read the title and some of the content, but at least they do have a male victim as an example as well, and they do say women can be pedophiles (or at least they don't argue with somebody who said it), something that's denied over and over again these days, even by medical experts making things up just to push the feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:57 AM
1

Although that sub is a hate group and it's only a single step away from being a cult, it doesn't really belong here. They're against everybody who doesn't agree with them a 100%, including women, and they're also trans-phobic, and the sub not being banned yet due to them constantly breaking rules left and right shows an issue with Reddit itself. There's r/FDSredpills to document and discuss what they're up to.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 04:55 PM
123

Men go to prison and/or die due to false accusations. Women most affected.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 02:22 PM
1

I hope this is fake but there's a real problem when politicians can propose any bill no matter how insane it is, and also that's not how you protest bullshit laws made by politicians pandering to religious nutbags. Everybody keeps missing the fucking point, they just keep virtue signaling to feminists when it's about whether a fucking embryo has human rights or not, not about what rights women have.
/r/PussyPass02/10/21 02:05 PM
2

And then the woman also argues that she was pressured into it, her lawyer corroborates and you get slapped with a criminal charge on top of the lawsuit.
/r/PussyPass02/10/21 02:02 PM
0

What they told me with the female Doctor isn't that it's normal for Time Lords to change sexes, it's that male Time Lords inevitably get broken under too much pressure and they can't cope with it, and instead of working through their problems, everything gets magically solved and reaches balance when they inevitably turn female. (A guard actually says it out loud how great it is that she's back to female when the Doctor kills him and he regenerates into her). Not because of character development…
/r/MensRights02/10/21 11:55 AM
3

That article was either written by a horrifyingly trained bot or a full blown feminazi.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 07:54 PM
4

The thing is, this is a very complex problem that's always simplified down to the "what's good for the children" argument that totally ignores what the best would be for them and picks the easiest option. You'd need a massive public outcry consistently for several years to even start the process of lawmakers thinking about changing things. But you won't get even a public whisper because almost everybody supports it who's never fallen into the many traps that child support holds for men, without …
/r/MensRights29/09/21 07:25 PM
12

This is what the trivialization of men's issues looks like.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 12:58 AM
10

These people are not banned because if they were, they'd shout "we're being silenced by the Patriarchy" and argue that they were just joking. There'd be an outcry, and whoever banned them would have to apologize and they'd lose their position. Radical feminism is terrorism, and it's working.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 01:54 AM
2

UK
/r/PussyPass27/09/21 06:50 PM
2

Yep, that qualifies. It's actually worse than when jobs do it, companies aren't democratic, governments should be. Good question how they enforce this, if they can just kick off men to make room for women, or vice versa (although I feel that happening to be unlikely) usually quotas imply that, that's a problem. Don't they have a constitution that protects civil rights? Edit: I see the Social Democratic Alliance does exactly that: "If, among the candidates, one sex is represented by less than 40 …
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:52 PM
3

Paranoia, that's it. It is indeed a sad reality, a sad reality for men that they're treated as violent criminals by random women all the time purely because of being outside, or just existing.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:45 PM
63

Have they denied men to run for office? Have they implemented more incentives to women than men? Have they made campaigns more difficult for men, or even denied men to do it? Have they done smear campaigns against men? Have they given women more money to do campaigns or a ruling that allows women to use money from sources men aren't allowed to? Do they pay women better when every factor that decides somebody's paycheck is accounted for? Have they made it harder for voters to vote for men? If the…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:17 PM
1

I have a feeling most of them are envious of the girls, which makes it troubling in more ways than one.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:43 AM
3

Boys will imagine girls naked even if they're wearing a cloak covering their entire body. But there's nothing wrong with that, what is wrong is how puberty and developing sexuality of boys became something they should be ashamed of according to feminists who are using that false narrative also to gaslight girls into thinking they can never be safe around boys or men.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:37 AM
1

Knowingly luring somebody into his death is murder the same way as actually stabbing him, in fact worse, it's not just pure violence, it's acting, manipulation on top of murder. You can't get more involved than that. That's no justice system, she'll be out in no time with no consequences in her adult life whatsoever. Another feminist victory. Also, off topic but again with the computers/phones/games/internet blaming? Children were beating up and killing each other before we even had electricity,…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 04:34 PM
6

It's not abandonment but the legal right to not be forced to pay a third or half of the income to a woman who got pregnant and kept the kid while knowing the man doesn't want it, to a woman who tricked him into it, to a woman who lied about birth control or intentionally damaged condoms, to a woman who cheated on him and the kid's actually somebody else's, to a woman who after divorce used her ex-husband's sperm to get pregnant, to a woman who raped a boy, etc.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 12:37 AM
6

Abortion isn't murder, however there are women who kill their children and aren't treated as the worst scum of humanity but just stressed people who deserve another chance and every support the father of the now dead kid won't ever get.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 12:31 AM
4

When they can't invalidate your argument, they try to invalidate you. Attacking the person they're arguing with instead of the argument is an age old tactic, total bullshit but still works among the like minded people who don't wanna hear anything else. And for some reason it can convince bystanders as well, which shows a deeper problem with how people think in general, or maybe like how people wanna conform to something they perceive as the majority.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:22 PM
5

Maybe she discovered FDS. Anyway, a relationship where you clearly can't speak your mind, can't have your own opinions and your problems are clearly ignored, even very serious ones, is definitely not a relationship worth keeping.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:23 AM
14

Very telling how under the video everybody seems to "conclude" that he's manipulating everybody, including the woman into taking the blame because she's afraid of retaliation. WTF is wrong with people? Women are perfectly capable of going nuts and beating up their boyfriends, or at least trying, and they know there won't be any consequences so that's just more incentive. He's injured, she's not, these are the facts, but the public is convinced he was an abusive boyfriend and now a murderer. Edit…
/r/PussyPass19/09/21 05:18 PM
11

It's feminist propaganda, take away the achievements of women in the past and deny that the majority of men and women have been on equal grounds for a long time now (i.e. they were all exploited and had no rights whatsoever while the top few made fun and a mockery out of them, and that mockery is being used often as facts to show how uncivilized people were back in the day) and you can sell the idea of a Patriarchy oppressing women left and right to this day.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 03:44 PM
22

It's super weird how feminists claim that a convenient mental illness that comes without warning and disappears without a trace is responsible, it's very common and can happen to any woman so you can't hold women responsible, yet they're still better suited for raising children than men. And they also claim that men who have any mental illness are not suited to raise children. Basically the feminist idea is to let the kids be raised by potential murderers instead of mostly just stressed out peop…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 04:05 PM
25

Every article operates like that, they want to put substance where there's none so fillers are used. It's also a good way to sway public opinion, they're implying that because somebody's attacked on multiple fronts, they must be guilty. Prosecutor's fallacy or a variation of it.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:36 PM
14

I mean, it's not over yet: While the judge tossed out the lawsuit, the woman has 20 days to amend and file a new complaint if her attorneys can provide more facts to get around the statute of limitations. Not sure what they can pull out of their asses to explain away the many issues with alleged repressed memories but I feel like they can come up with some ridiculous thing and make it work. Manson is rich, that's plenty of incentive for her and her attorneys to bullshit their way through it. Any…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:26 PM
5

A group of people think there are superior and inferior human races out there. What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights14/09/21 04:28 PM
7

Sad how there are people who think a virus cares about whether somebody has a foreskin. Worse that they don't even know what's happening during penetration.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 12:50 AM
1

The problem with any punishment with long lasting effects is that nobody pushing it over anything else wants to consider context. Did the boy actually know it's sexual assault? Fun fact, what is and what's not isn't some built-in knowledge and it pretty much changes all the time, especially men have an overwhelming amount of "rules" they have to follow to avoid sexual harassment claims, and even that changes all the time and on a per person basis. But back to the point, context matters. Did thes…
/r/MensRights12/09/21 05:11 PM
8

You know that radical feminism has already won when a woman can say "nobody would believe that a strong man was beaten up by a fragile woman" and keep beating up the objectively stronger man who can't defend himself for fear of going to prison.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 06:32 PM
4

Not weird, but worthless. As a man you pretty much have to assume that consent doesn't exist and whatever you do can and will be used against you. Funny how that last part appeared in everyday life but that is reality. You either trust a woman that they won't abuse their privileges or don't. If you don't, don't even look at her.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 05:05 PM
1

Utter bullshit. Every woman says it's men attacking women again without even acknowledging that there's plenty of women supporting this law in Texas (hell, there's plenty of women who'd support this anywhere on the planet, I'd bet more than men), and it's a religious bullshit about "heartbeat equals human being with rights to live", it's about the embryo, not the woman, but they just derail the argument to hate on men more and continue with the gaslighting without even trying to find a solution.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:50 AM
6

Rape is possible without penetration occurring so that definition doesn't make sense, no matter what you add to it.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 12:47 PM
4

That doesn't really make sense unless you talk about a government owned and controlled media outlet. Every other can call it what it is based on dictionary definitions. They can be sued by the government, sure, but if that's likely to happen and they worry about that so they censor themselves, than it's a government controlled media, not free press. Free press is allowed to call out a government and its laws for being biased, in fact it's one of their jobs. There's bigger problems in a country t…
/r/MensRights08/09/21 12:40 PM
15

Misidentification is different. Here the people who knew exactly how unreliable eye witnesses and even victims can be are to blame. They just want a quick win and it doesn't matter to them who goes to prison. Add the jury system to it that's designed to rely on emotions a lot more than facts and you get everything you could ever need for a disaster. Edit: Not to mention that I have a feeling they "asked" that girl so many times how certain she is that by the end even she believed that she's a 10…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 03:59 PM
1

No, it would be a paradox if both were the same type of activity but one was good for you while the other was not. By calling it a paradox they say it's the same so the effects should be the same, but that's false equivalence.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:31 PM
19

released on bail So, it's not over for him yet, he still has to face trial? I can already see the claim that he should pay child support anyway
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:41 PM
21

Funny how women, no matter how high they climb, argue that women are incapable of acting on their own and can't have responsibilities whenever they fuck up.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:52 PM
16

Crude modelling indicated shorter mean survival times among men in physically active occupations than in those with sedentary occupations. However, this finding was reversed following adjustment for confounding factors (birth cohort, education, income, ethnicity, prevalent cardiovascular disease, smoking, leisure-time physical activity, body-mass index) I don't have time to read the entire thing but did they just say that they twisted the data until it showed what they wanted to see? A 2018 syst…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 11:51 PM
2

If the genders were reversed, public opinion would want to do the same to him instead of praising him and waiting for him to get out after writing a book and be rich and successful.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:56 AM
10

For fucks sake, they're even encouraging people over there to send her emails and letters in prison for support. What a fucking cesspool that comment section is.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:54 AM
13

who literally lost control, snapped Oh, she was very much in control and knew exactly what she was doing. Even the court agreed, pussy pass denied. Still fucked up that she's now a hero in public opinion for killing somebody in a way that's illegal even during a war.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:44 AM
3

"I suffered through it, you have to as well". That's behind all men who support it, nothing some therapy wouldn't resolve, but they never get it and end up with something analogous to Stockholm syndrome (probably it has its own name but no idea what it is)
/r/MensRights27/08/21 12:01 PM
2

That is physical and psychological torture at the same time, of a minor no less, every person in that video except the kid should end up in prison for that.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 11:56 AM
9

Everybody's equal but let's treat everybody differently based on their gender. lOgIc
/r/MensRights26/08/21 05:20 PM
16

False equivalency at its finest
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:41 AM
14

The Patriarchy at it again /s
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:13 AM
9

In fact, participants make negative progress, because this swallowing-the-patriarchy move generates a lot of guilt and resentment. I always said that it's intentional, if people can't find the enemy you're talking about when they actually look, you either acknowledge that you're wrong or you create it yourself.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 08:07 PM
12

how men are now being treated as women have been before How were women treated before, in the west? Some women were definitely frowned upon while trying to break into places where not even men were allowed to get in unless they were born to the right families, but that wasn't men vs. women, that was upper class vs. lower class, the few in the upper class had huge privileges, including women among them, very rich and very powerful women with their own women-only things, and the vast majority of p…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:11 PM
21

It is not as common as they say, and usually has little to do with sexual desires. It's more of a power play. Still sexual but the reason and motivation behind it is often not. Edit: source: my therapist when I talked to her about her colleague who was raped and murdered. But feminists say "If men can't get off, they rape women, and porn makes men rape women, and video games make men rape women, and every man is a rapist because every man wants sex and that's the only requirement for somebody to…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:33 PM
9

And then you're labeled a creep because why else would you have that camera, or jailed because it's illegal where you live to record people without their prior consent.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:36 PM
3

Imagine supporting, lobbying for and actively pushing the discrimination, abuse, exploitation and hate of a specific group of people. That shit is a bannable offense on any and every platform, but not if the targets are "only" men. Somewhere something went horribly wrong in society.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:42 PM
3

Yeah, it's not female teachers favoring girls, male teachers giving more slack to pretty girls (not necessarily because of attraction, could easily be the teacher not wanting to face sexual harassment charges for no reason), definitely not boys participating in a lot more sports and every school having quotas where they have to include women, whether they deserve or not, even by adjusting how they grade them, no, it's women have more developed brains. This same argument was used by a very few pe…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 05:18 PM
2

It's in Doctor Who. It never took itself seriously but the 2005 series slowly but steadily reduced one of the smartest man in existence to an idiot, other straight male characters, main or recurring, were also not particularly functional on their own (though Rory got some boost at the end) and since the regeneration allows for switching genders, they did that with him and with the Master, the villain. In both cases turning into a woman fixed a barely functional, incoherent mess of a man. Not by …
/r/MensRights13/08/21 04:57 PM
4

The main sources of evidence are from statutory child protection reports, child abuse and neglect prevalence studies, and police statistics of criminal offences relating to child physical and sexual assault. It's in the third paragraph, not even hidden, have you even read what you linked? Then it explains how this is a limitation. Also, it's Australia, and this post is from the CDC. Your second one doesn't really go into where their evidence comes from (or does it in French?) but here's an inter…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 04:46 PM
3

The certain sources are in your sources you moron.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 12:53 PM
10

Why do they replace male characters with females? There is a show where they did switch the main character's gender, they gradually turned a very smart and intelligent man into an idiot and an emotional mess who always had to be pulled out from trouble by women, then turned him into a woman and now she's smart, intelligent and stable again. They did that with one of the villains as well. Worse that it's aimed for young audiences.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 11:33 PM
13

There's also a lot of shows where they turned men into idiots only there for comic relief in contrast with the women who carry everything.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 11:24 PM
9

Fun fact: they only measure reported cases that were acknowledged as such from certain sources. What do you think happens outside that and especially when the "nobody will believe you" women are the abusers? Nothing.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 11:17 PM
19

I can see feminists publicly shame men who report it. There's a reason men don't come forward too often.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 07:54 PM
11

Feminists will say that this is practically 50-50, blame convenient mental disorders that appear out of nowhere and immediately disappear when the woman is done with the abuse with no pattern of repetition, and blame men, including young boys who must be under men's influence, so technically abusers are 100% men. Gaslighting is part of the Feminist 101.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 07:25 PM
8

Just another reason why a jury system shouldn't be part of a justice system when it comes to criminal law.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 07:20 PM
2

Ah, yes, strategic dating that consists of treating men as ATM and hating everything else about them, often more at the same time, constantly being paranoid about men, even in long-lasting marriages, and calling that the ideal relationship. They even extend this to the son's of women, you have to be paranoid about them as well because boys are born evil in their eyes. How empowering to tell women that they can't get love, satisfaction, appreciation, respect, anything mutual, only money and they …
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:13 PM
9

You can't expect the application of the scientific method from social sciences, which is, contrary to its name, not science. It's just propaganda to whoever is backing them.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 05:39 PM
15

Well, it's hard to publicly admit something you can even lose a job over.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 03:28 PM
9

The best way to keep a narrative around is to silence everybody who doesn't agree.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:38 PM
5

Men outnumber women in prisons for everything many times, so every crime is committed by men many times more. 2Head logic.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:28 PM
80

I want stupid laws making stupid things possible but only if I benefit from them. --Feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:21 PM
24

"equality" as opposed to "men's equality" Making that distinction says they want equality where women have it but men don't. Which is of course not equality but that's today's feminism.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 01:16 AM
13

Everything is business to a lawyer, but this shit goes a lot further than the usual because it's not just money, somebody will go to prison. Off topic: "What is the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA)?"\ Cica means kitty in Hungarian.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 01:01 AM
437

In the 21st century this should count as multiple crimes.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 07:50 PM
6

Women are children according to the vast majority of feminist views.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 07:18 PM
10

I'm pretty sure if you wanted to put piercings into a baby or split their tongue there'd be major uproar. Double standards as always. Yes, it should be illegal. Even for Jews.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 07:13 PM
7

Intoxicated woman says yes to having sex = she was raped. Intoxicated man says yes to having sex = he raped somebody. That's the standard everywhere as far as feminists are concerned. Double standards all the way down. So many men get into trouble because of this, especially in colleges.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 09:55 PM
1

Yeah, let's support ruining lives and driving men into suicide just for the fun of it! /s
/r/MensRights28/07/21 09:48 PM
42

Men always had more rights. The right to die for your country in wars, the right to not get any help if you survive and come home with debilitating PTSD, the right to STFU because women are most affected, etc.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:07 PM
12

You want to get married for real ? Get a a lawyer and she gets herself a lawyer to write one at least a year before marriage! So bs cannot work it court. Don't be naive, she'd say she was pressured into it and the guy would even go to jail after she takes everything from him.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:06 PM
10

r/NoahGetTheBoat
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:04 PM
6

In this day and age if you're a woman, sober, and aren't continuously giving consent with clear "yes, I do want it" throughout the entire intercourse or you change your mind later, you were raped. If you have 0.001% alcohol or drug (even a legal one or medicine) in your bloodstream, you can only be raped. Of course nothing similar, not even partially applies to men, especially drunk, men should be happy they got some. /s I do agree though that the word rape was cheapened, it was redefined to the…
/r/MensRights17/07/21 04:55 PM
6

A detailed story about a poor girl who had it rough, just lashed out, and who still has it rough and nothing about his father's story who, after a decade of imprisonment and in who knows what kind of hell created by other prisoners for him because of this, will probably end up on the streets as a drug addict and die in a gutter somewhere. That can be predicted for him knowing how little feminist backed social support cares, but what he needs is a new identity somewhere far away, serious compensa…
/r/MensRights16/07/21 11:03 AM
2

A criminal record that can be erased, especially something like this, unlike the stigma men get when they were labeled a rapist once even falsely.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 07:38 PM
5

Put a /s there if it's sarcasm, otherwise shame on you.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 07:36 PM
1

Can I just add that fuck that Kendall Fisher? Universal barrier my ass, it's a universal problem that should always be addressed, it's a crime and should legally be a crime as well.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 07:31 PM
12

It's already harder, it's been harder for quite some time now. Hell, you could argue that in the west it's always been either equally hard or harder, unless you were on the top of the social structure.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 05:15 PM
18

As somebody who paints his nails I can tell you this bullshit attempt at brainwashing is a stupid idea designed to raise withdrawn and angry boys who will lash out at women so feminists can say "We've told you so, despite our best efforts all men are evil" Nail polish, clothing, wellness, etc. has nothing to do with how somebody perceives themselves and how they'll act in general, but forcing it is a great way to annoy them to the point that they'll start genuinely resenting people who came up w…
/r/MensRights12/07/21 11:47 AM
4

Double standards. "I think this group of people have something good going for them, therefore as I'm not part of that group, I'm allowed to hate on them because they're privileged and I'm not". All logic breaks down at this point and shows exactly how the unwillingness of even a few to use their brains and treat people equally leads to envy and/or hate. I'd even go as far as to hypothesize that every major conflict and tragedy that occurred in history and the still ongoing ones started with a "j…
/r/MensRights09/07/21 03:32 PM
9

I was about to write this has no place here but wow, that's a good twist.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 09:55 AM
9

With the dog metaphor you can make the argument that a dog only has two legs because the two limbs in the front are the same limbs arms evolve from. Definition is the key of everything but it can be twisted in many ways.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:32 AM
-1

Yep, but biological arguments related to animals but involving conscious decisions always fail when you consider that humans are very unique in nature with how complex our brain is.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 03:00 PM
4

"Women don't tend to cheat unless there's something wrong with the relationship." - indeed, and the wrong in that relationships are those women. Respect the other or GTFO, that's it!
/r/MensRights06/07/21 02:53 PM
16

r/NoahGetTheBoat
/r/MensRights05/07/21 02:29 PM
2

Traditional means stereotypical in practice, and almost always stems from weird beliefs and disinformation spread by deeply religious groups. Nobody wants that apart from those groups that are still around, and even people in those groups change. What men in general want that counts as actual traditional is affection, love, respect, support and loyalty, the same as women, the basics of any monogamous relationship, men just don't talk about it much because they're ridiculed by women if they do.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 02:12 PM
8

It is. It gives you answers to any question you could have as long as you don't ask questions they don't want you to.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 06:44 PM
23

Well, decades-long consistent manipulation and gas-lighting does require intelligence from the people coming up with it. They could use it to actually do something good for humanity but that was never the intent, at least not for a long long time. People doing and not just following this shit are not stupid, just either evil or psychopaths.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 04:54 PM
3

I only care about the statistics I make up. ...Or something like that, I can't remember the exact saying.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 04:50 PM
4

Nothing will change as long as the default as far as every politician, wherever they stand on abortion, is concerned is that the circumstances don't matter, the father is responsible for the money and the mother is responsible for raising the kid. Pretty much this is the bedrock of a notion feminism is so against, gender roles, but only as long as it benefits them. Personally I think a father should only be legally responsible for the kid if he and his partner were planning it or they're still i…
/r/MensRights30/06/21 05:02 PM
0

Their results are still skewed towards men, and nothing about the limitations of their numbers, including how many is the unknown in all of that. Of course more women die if women live longer from a sickness that affects older people more! This is also a typical study that has to be done globally, not locally (especially not only using some data from some sources). Still pretty much no difference between them. This is not a gendered issue however hard they try to make it so with a bunch of hears…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 02:53 PM
-1

Add to it that women live a bit longer than men, so if there are more old women than men, and the older you are, the higher the cache you get a stroke, but men still get more... hmmmmm.......As if it was skewed because men have more factors contributing to getting it, like stress. Still a good enough halfway split, and it's not even exact numbers from a reference to a meta-analysis or something with sources and known uncertainty.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 02:43 PM
0

Having a punishment for a crime and treating the underlying cause doesn't equal to excusing crimes, and education goes a long way to convince people if there's money going into it, which usually is not the case when entire businesses are built to lock people up for as long as they can so they don't lose profit. But it also shouldn't aggravate the punishment. Pedophiles who harm children shouldn't get out of prison, but heroin addicts who steal shirts shouldn't get 20 years in prison because they…
/r/PussyPass25/06/21 08:09 AM
-1

Yeah, fuck treating mental illness as mental illness, that's the spirit! /s The thing is, actions have consequences but willpower won't solve addiction, especially knowing how it's treated by people who don't think about it even for a moment and only say "they just have to quit and they'll quit". That's like saying to a person with a headache to stop feeling the headache, and after it didn't work, blaming them for not wanting it hard enough. Sure, it can work as a placebo, but you don't want to …
/r/PussyPass24/06/21 07:00 PM
-5

Yeah, nothing teaches people not to get addicted to drugs more than ruining addicts' lives more than the drug did. /s
/r/PussyPass24/06/21 05:13 PM
5

They don't, it's just politics.
/r/PussyPass20/06/21 12:35 PM
4

Language changes naturally with the times, what people find appropriate will become common and what they don't will be left behind. That's always been the case, words come and go, but what many do currently is try and force one specific change they came up with. It's not a change that comes naturally from a collective (there's actually many changes like that happening, pretty much every word in question has many neutral alternatives already and have been for a long time), but it's a change that …
/r/MensRights19/06/21 03:06 PM
11

People who have nothing better to do than argue about using the -man suffix don't really care about its origin or whether it means what they think it means. Controlling language, being a prescriptivist instead of a descriptivist is just a step towards training people to be controlled.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 02:47 PM
59

What about the mental health of the now brain damaged nurse?
/r/PussyPass18/06/21 01:08 PM
3

Equal opportunities will never equate to equal outcome as people are different in many ways and some things will appeal to some kind of people more than to others, but there won't ever be a point in time when every person thinks and acts the same, unless everybody is forced into it. And people who push for equal outcome know this exactly. That's why they're doing it, policies like that are to show off outside but internally they're about controlling people, not just what's allowed and not, but a…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 09:44 AM
9

We'll end up with extremely high white collar (and petty) crime-rates among women, that's the only thing these bullshit policies will achieve.
/r/PussyPass17/06/21 03:13 PM
14

Phimosis is not life threatening, most boys have it and usually goes away a few years later. Even if it doesn't, it's often a non-issue unless there are other symptoms or it's really bad. I have it and it's not a problem. Not even during sex, actually, I'm pretty sure it's stretched enough since I was a kid. Sure, it's a bit inconvenient but with lubrication (which always came naturally from my partner) it slides up. Pulling it back down can be weird but I'm used to it, and it helps that I'm a g…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 03:03 PM
6

Messing with her phone while driving should put her in jail without the accident, the accident should put her away for a long time.
/r/PussyPass15/06/21 09:46 AM
27

When a Southern African country has better judgment than the highly acclaimed western society.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 09:15 AM
30

The study likely underrepresents the real number of suspected suicideattempts because Americans were hesitant to go to hospitals during thepandemic, in fear of contracting COVID-19, So, we can safely assume that more boys, who generally get the "just grow some balls", or "man up", or "just get over it" treatment, didn't end up in the ER and especially not with a psychologist unless it was really serious. A suicide attempt can be a million things, many don't even involve the actual will to die an…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 05:15 PM
6

Because intense pain of men caused by something that could lead to testicular cancer resulting in either the loss of one or two testicles or death is really funny and a wholesome entertainment of the entire family. /s
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:51 PM
2

I'm one of them, but overtime is still overtime, not paying extra for that is illegal everywhere where workers have rights. Doesn't matter if you have a fixed salary or an hourly wage, overtime is overtime.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 10:28 AM
1

It is, though, in the same field and position. Overtime is always overtime, doesn't matter if you're a janitor or a senior manager in a bank.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 01:05 AM
2

Ah, yeah, disagreeable based on the big five. There's a super reasonable and fully accepted, not at all controversial hypothesis on human behavior. /s
/r/MensRights13/06/21 01:03 AM
37

Yep. This is when women shout toxic masculinity even though women are in every key position when it comes to raising and teaching children, and they're hesitant at best to allow some men in, but only men who conform to certain "standards"
/r/MensRights12/06/21 12:41 PM
2

Considering they usually get away with it, 32 months is not bad at all.
/r/PussyPass04/06/21 01:30 PM
52

Since piracy ultimately helps the original I wouldn't advise it. Boycotting works better.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 09:00 AM
66

Yeah, but you don't know what they think until your actions are labeled one way or the other.
/r/MensRights28/05/21 10:11 AM
5

He said she said situation. With two additional witnesses behind what he said. And no evidence to what she said. Regardless of what happened, that "news" article is basically a blog post of somebody who clearly made up their mind painting a picture of the events that suits their version even better than the version of the woman it's about. I don't know what happened there before the police arrived but that article is not reporting, nor news, and harmful with how clearly divisive it is if you loo…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 08:50 AM
8

just say denser than a neutron star, you can't go wrong with that
/r/MensRights18/05/21 12:02 PM
40

Also you're not allowed to openly talk about this or say this is an issue because then you're just advocating for the Patriarchy The second part has an easy solution though, but it's never gonna happen. A man should be allowed to say he doesn't want to be a father, and unless they can prove that he slept with the woman to reproduce (borderline impossible unless they were planning it openly), she'd be legally on her own if she kept the kid. Would be better for everybody. Laws shouldn't do two thi…
/r/MensRights17/05/21 07:46 PM
2

I may be pessimistic but I have a feeling that petitions like that will discourage funding of gender neutral programs very quickly. Nobody wants to be seen as anti-feminist all across social media, even though radical feminists are behind those claims.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 12:33 PM
3

The patriarchy strikes again with institutional oppression of women /s
/r/MensRights13/05/21 12:42 PM
1

Notice how I made a distinction between religious overreach, things like the purity ball, and parental protection. That can take many forms, normally it's encouragement of healthy and discouragement of unhealthy relationships. That is the global norm. How that's applied is a different question and would probably need a decade long research and analysis to answer it... no idea if anybody ever has done that, or whether it even matters. People don't usually beat, lock up or torture kids nowadays, t…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 01:43 PM
4

For a Father to be protective of his daughter's sexuality indicates, to me, a deeply toxic family dynamic. The father is either A: Possessive of her sexuality him self, which is gross, or B: Is preserving her sexual purity in the interest of a future man, which is also extremely gross. Or perhaps he just doesn't want her to jump into something she's not prepared for, which is part of a parent's job. Not that "protecting" virginity is a common idea anyway. Maybe in parts of the US where Mornoms a…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 10:50 PM
4

Oh my fucking god, so many insults in so few words. And not just for men, this also insults women who're not so far gone that they think everybody is out to rape, murder and rape again them.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:17 PM
36

It does remove all benefits if the cheater is the man.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 10:42 AM
21

"I can see ordering child support because the child had no say in the matter" That should only apply if the rapist is hit with the child support. In this case the kid should be with either her grandparents, a foster family or even with her father if he wanted to, and her mother should be the one paying child support.
/r/PussyPass03/05/21 07:56 PM
54

Just like this. He didn't have income, then the courts hit him with everything when he grew up and got a job.
/r/PussyPass03/05/21 07:52 PM
97

"Although there has been some public outcry over charging a crime victim with child support, the courts have consistently said states have every right to do so." I'm guessing not much changed since 2014 when this was written
/r/PussyPass03/05/21 07:51 PM
2

So in Canada more women have jobs that can't be done remotely or even with workplace distancing than men? I highly doubt that. Also, if they didn't have to leave their jobs but they did anyway... why do we care? People choosing not to work never had social support anywhere, ever. Why would now women be an exception? Is this a UBI proposal that only applies to women? I wouldn't be surprised at this point.
/r/PussyPass29/04/21 05:21 PM
7

Ah, yes, every woman who kills her child has a rare mental illness (that's also conveniently defined as anything from bad mood to fucking schizophrenia), and every man who does it exists is motivated only by misogyny. /s
/r/MensRights28/04/21 02:26 PM
17

"Sorry, this post has been removed by the moderators of r/NoahGetTheBoat." I wonder why... /s Edit: actually I couldn't find this story anywhere, only a teacher of 5th graders having sex with a 15-year old, maybe that's its origin. But I also found a substitute teacher who was arrested because she filmed herself masturbating in front of a 2nd grade class! ...What the fuck is wrong with people?
/r/PussyPass26/04/21 09:47 PM
19

The worst case scenario can actually be worse, more and more women argue that by initiating a conversation you're harassing them if you're not attractive enough in their eyes.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 03:15 PM
0

Yeah, I don't understand what the hell is Twitch doing, it's slowly turning into a PG Chaturbate, but don't even try to look towards the line drawn by the TOS when it comes to nudity if you're not an attractive woman. However, I'd argue that being in a bikini is not nudity in any way and we should really move away from making that comparison, the problem is not with that, but with the double standards, and how many women clearly imply a lot of sexuality like that or go as far as to only promote …
/r/MensRights25/04/21 03:08 PM
11

She shouldn't even be allowed near her own daughter, let alone be spared from prison because of her.
/r/PussyPass24/04/21 10:15 AM
17

Or after, women can do that and it's completely valid according to women
/r/MensRights23/04/21 09:31 AM
3

Are you fucking telling me that we live in an age where 15-year-olds, nay, an 8-year-old can be subjected to sex change and not people who want it but people who object against it are shut down by courts? What. The. Fuck! Did I miss the memo that people in the middle ages were right and children are just small but fully developed adults?
/r/MensRights21/04/21 02:49 PM
0

The problem is that you can understand it however you want, they can say you're actually a white supremacist misogynist and what you're saying is to engineer a human race where women not just don't exist, but people don't have a single X chromosome. And there would be applause among them, and some would actually believe it. Radical feminism is the correct and already existing term, that doesn't even apply to all feminists. For everything else, there's asshole.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:55 PM
2

I know. But unlike a jury that's designed to be biased and easy to lead, a judge should know better and be impartial.
/r/PussyPass21/04/21 07:51 AM
2

I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with men's rights. In fact as a man who likes to paint his nails but can't most of the time, I know how frustrating it can get, especially when your parents tell you that it's not normal. It can only be worse with hair because it's apparent all the time.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:58 PM
56

"but the Judge ruled there was insufficient evidence to prove this was the cause of his death" It's funny how a judge can say that evidence from medical professionals (and common sense) is insufficient. "The Judge accepted that her life had been extremely troubled and that she had also suffered domestic violence in a previous relationship" Woman: I'm fucked up in the head and I want revenge on anybody so I'm murdering, please go easy on me. Judge: Okay.
/r/PussyPass17/04/21 03:11 PM
2

It's talk page is especially "enjoyable" when they argue that the page can't talk about sexism against men because sexism against men don't exist, sources that say it does are lying, and trying to include it is against the rules about topics having to be non-biased and neutral. Don't they see the irony? Clearly shows the problem with Wikipedia, a limited group of people can pretty much write anything and remove anything they (are paid to) disagree with. And they want to become a UNESCO World Her…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 08:48 PM
23

"Wolf-whistling was once considered a compliment: my how times have changed." They still do if the woman finds the guy doing it attractive enough.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:42 PM
6

It's funny how they hide extremely dangerous generalization behind the veil of talking about actual abuse. I always feel uncomfortable around people so much so that I avoid doing things I really should until it's almost too late and I have to rush with everything. When I hear two or more people laughing, my first thought is that they're laughing on me. I don't want to share anything about me to people because I feel they'd use it against me. Does that mean every person around me is abusing me? B…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:39 PM
27

It's easier to accept national pet's day than national father's day. Even though that at least exists pretty much everywhere, barely anybody knows or cares about it. You definitely don't get a reminder from literally everywhere from spams to news organizations that it's coming up, unlike with mother's day.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 02:55 PM
273

"A defamation lawsuit by a novelist and former university professor against a woman who accused him of rape could have a chilling effect on future victims of sexualized violence" No. The chilling effect is caused by women who falsely accuse men and give ammunition to those very few who actually want to harm or silence them and this is what discourages actual rape victims to come forward, they're afraid of not being believed because a large portion of accusations turn out to be false. Men seeking…
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:40 PM
14

"It noted the thousands of testimonials posted anonymously by students" Yeah, children tend to be perfectly fair and say only facts when given the chance to say anything anonymously, especially when the girls know they can only benefit from saying exactly what these people wanna hear. Not to mention that it's very easy to get "overwhelming levels of sexual harassment" when a boy who's currently undergoing puberty and just figures out his sexuality doesn't get any support in that process, but eve…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 10:04 PM
27

Put something like that on as a man and you'll be put away for assault with a weapon
/r/MensRights06/04/21 10:49 AM
6

Wait, if white people don't need protection from harassment, does that mean they're also fine with harassing white women or they don't think white women are people? Or do they draw the line with white trans people not being people? We know they're okay with enabling sexual abuse of children... not much is surprising after that. Although it's a real problem that somehow men and white people don't fall under everyone and/or don't have an identity, apparently we're nobodies in the eyes of the gods …
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:44 AM
2

However you look at it and whatever the intention is behind it, men should not apologize for something they didn't do. Nobody should. That said, I have a feeling that there are men out there already who actually think they have to. But that's just worse.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 02:52 PM
8

The cause can be a number of things, but the correlation is visible. Now, it's entirely possible that what shows in the numbers is that suicidal men lose their jobs more often, are in bad financial states and have more family problems, but even in that case there should be an underlying reason as to why men commit suicide more often under certain conditions, and the question whether men get more suicidal in general is raised.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 12:51 PM
12

Increase diversity, i.e. don't hire the person best suited for the job, hire the person whose bodily features matches an arbitrary set. I'm pretty sure people used to heavily protest, occasionally flood the streets because of this line of thinking only a few decades ago.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 04:55 PM
60

The FUCK is wrong with the UK justice system!? How's it better for the wider community that this bitch walks around in it?
/r/PussyPass01/04/21 02:18 PM
2

The bad apples are the rapists, sexists, racists, terrorists, their supporters and enablers. They exist, and I'm not putting anything into anybody's head. Society in general has a bad habit of putting millions into the same group as a few coming from the same place, having the same religion, having a common bodily feature, etc. Of course this in itself is generally also racist and/or sexist. This entire subreddit is in part about the idea that men should not be defined based on the actions of a …
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:18 PM
20

I read it. Do I understand it correctly that the only thing they did is to say that if somebody drinks, they can still give consent (so not automatic consent, as the headlines say), and in this case a new trial is needed because the jury may have worked from the view that that's impossible and that might have changed the verdict? It's ironic, though, that lawmakers and everybody in that field use legalese so that everything they write could only have one exact meaning, but it always makes everyt…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 05:21 PM
44

I don't think a newborn baby is shaved /s
/r/MensRights29/03/21 04:37 PM
2

This actually sounds reasonable. It's pretty much universal in law that if you drink alcohol and do something, being intoxicated cannot mean you're not personally responsible for the consequences, in fact in many cases it's an aggravative circumstance if you break the law. Unless the context is that "if you're blacked out and somebody comes up to you and fucks you, that's not illegal", there's nothing wrong with spelling out that drunk people can still give consent if they're not too drunk. What…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:03 PM
26

From what I've read in their posts mostly it's harmless, however some do look weird, like how according to them women only belong in high paid white collar jobs, they still claim the pay gap exists, and say that everybody should only do business with companies owned by women. So there are problems.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 07:02 PM
7

"The decline in women who consider themselves as feminists is perhaps more concerning. It may be that fewer now feel the need to be feminist in a less stereotyped world, but it may also be that the word is seen to lack sufficient impact." It's not concerning given what feminism is today in developed countries, and I really hope the article's suggested cause is not the case but instead sane women realizing that radical feminists are not about equality but dominance, hate and sexism.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 04:07 PM
17

I wouldn't call it positive, that account hijacked the hashtag to talk about how men can only abuse women. Do talk about women being abused but don't put a hashtag that has nothing to do with it there because that strongly implies you're directing the post against people who'd want to use it.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 02:04 PM
17

Are people that evil? People? No. But radical feminists are. Although I don't think Instagram needed any report to block it. Companies follow the money and any narrative that yields profit, they don't really care what's right and what's true. Edit: it seems it's just hidden behind this text: "We've hidden posts for #menarevictimstoo to protect our community from content that may encourage behavior that can cause harm and even lead to death*."* What. The. Actual. Fuck!? Edit2: Oh. It seems all po…
/r/MensRights23/03/21 01:45 PM
6

I am not my gender? Is there something wrong with your or my gender? I don't think so. That should be rephrased to something that means "My gender is not a problem and one bad apple doesn't spoil the bunch", like the rest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/21 09:34 AM
10

I am not my gender? Is there something wrong with your or my gender? I don't think so. That should be rephrased to something that means "My gender is not a problem and one bad apple doesn't spoil the bunch", like the rest.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:33 AM
8

I'm pretty sure it goes further, if a woman cheats on a man who can't have children while they're in a monogamous relationship, she's justified in the eyes of other women.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 07:19 PM
12

They do monitor this sub and others, like FDSRedpills. All "feminist" oriented subs do. And the mods freely admit that they don't care about the rules and ban you without any reason. Doesn't matter if you then report it to reddit, nothing happens.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 12:57 PM
6

Yeah, the statistics. Are they talking about statistics that include false accusations against men, don't include men who never report their abuse, and make assumptions about how many women don't report abuse while not doing the same for men?
/r/MensRights17/03/21 04:49 PM
5

When I was growing up my mother abused my father, she even went as far once as to hit him with a fire iron. That thing literally bent, I've no idea how my father was lucky enough not to break a bone or something. He never hit back, he just took away whatever my mother found to use as a weapon and went outside, just walked away and came back a few hours later. And always came back. They're still together for over 45 years now. And for context my father did hard physical labor his entire life, eve…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 04:43 PM
0

My take about women instead of catching up or quitting making the army lower their standards specifically for them? Literally this is what's happening.
/r/PussyPass15/03/21 07:40 AM
-7

And why are you telling me this?
/r/PussyPass15/03/21 12:11 AM
-5

I see the feminazi brigade arrived with their downvotes...
/r/PussyPass15/03/21 12:07 AM
-10

It helps women who want an easy career in bossing around men.
/r/PussyPass15/03/21 12:05 AM
-26

Many women practice martial arts and do insane shit most men without a decade of practice couldn't even dream of doing, and many women do body building and throw around weights most men could only pick up with a forklift. Yes, women often have to push harder to start off but if it becomes a lifestyle and they don't have a condition preventing it (people with those don't belong to the military, men and women), they can do it. Whether they want to, that's a different question. Clearly whoever advo…
/r/PussyPass14/03/21 11:07 PM
79

There would be outrage and the company would go down due to all the negative press. Same if a woman was refused service. Double standards exist.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:34 AM
9

"with everything going on in the news it’s to be expected." No, it's fucking not expected. People die all the time but that doesn't and can't mean suddenly a woman freaking out because she saw a man is okay in any way. That's just blatant sexism and should not be tolerated under any circumstances. In fact, refusing service based on this is (or should be, in the UK I can imagine that discrimination only applies when it's against women) illegal, not even a private company on their own property can…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:28 AM
15

Yep. It's funny how a woman drinking and having sex is rape regardless of what she agreed to, but that doesn't apply to men drinking. In fact, being drunk is a get-out-of-jail-free card for women because their judgment was impaired but an aggravating circumstance for men because they knew their judgment is going to be impaired before they started drinking.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 03:18 PM
6

There are no signs and signals. Women just say that because they don't know what they want and blame men for not figuring it out for them.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 03:13 PM
15

Maybe "feminism" is the actual solution to the Fermi Paradox. Every alien species has at least two genders but one is always bitching until they go extinct.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 03:11 PM
3

The kid was 13, there's always overlap. Also, according to the DSM-5 in the US, a 13 year old is still prepubescent, and the ICD-10 defines pedophilia as attraction to prepubescent and early pubescent children. The UK is probably not that different in this regard.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:31 PM
8

30 months. Multiply it by 12 with a lifetime ban from being around anybody under the age of 18 and call her a pedophile what she is, and it's good enough.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:08 AM
3

A woman who needs CPR: nope, I'm not going to jail for sexual assault. Same with children, the risk of getting labeled a pedophile because you wanted to help with anything is just too big.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:02 AM
13

So, if I understand correctly what they're saying is that, "We could advocate for every person to have a social safety net in general, but no, we wanna advocate for women who chose not to have a family or even a relationship and only have a pet to get the same support as women who have a family to rely on, we're jealous as fuck" Every non-suicidal society will always prefer families over single people, that's just very simple logic; no group of people can continue to exist if they don't have chi…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 03:17 PM
24

I see the patriarchy strikes again /s
/r/PussyPass04/03/21 03:37 PM
44

You know how it goes, if women drink, they're not responsible for anything they do to men, but the men are. And if men drink, that's an aggravating circumstance. Totally fair. /s
/r/PussyPass02/03/21 10:43 PM
61

Civic duties shouldn't override or conflict with human rights. Of course people don't want to serve, nobody wants to die because some idiot insulted another idiot in a political setting, and people generally don't have any problem with other countries, it's the politicians who make conflicts most often than not. As for building things as a civic duty, that's called slavery, even when the military does it unless all of the soldiers chose to enlist without any pressure, and get paid decently.
/r/PussyPass28/02/21 06:25 PM
299

Imagine having to pay extra taxes because you were born with a disability or got cancer for example. That's more fucked up than drafting people into the military, which is by default the violation of several human rights. And it only applies based on your sex, so also sexist. Switzerland, you're supposed to be better than this, you were neutral even in the middle of both World Wars and nobody bothered you. The fuck do you need forced military service?
/r/PussyPass28/02/21 05:58 PM
3

Don't have time to watch the rest.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 04:52 PM
6

Why We Should Teach Children Feminism | Ariana Gupta | TEDxMAIS Warning, may contain sarcasm. "We look at men and women differently" - Well, duh. The two sexes do exist no matter how hard people try to say biology is made up. You can dress up as a woman or a man, you can dress androgynous, you can transition from one to the other, you can have a dick while looking like a woman from a Playboy cover, but that doesn't make the biological, genetic and hormonal differences go away, in fact people do …
/r/MensRights26/02/21 04:52 PM
5

It's never welcome when a group of people wants to control everybody else based on their own arbitrary set of ideas.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 03:36 PM
117

Reported, keyword. I have a feeling that there's more men who never report it because men are the ones getting constantly told from a very young age to "just get over it". And it's still higher.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 11:58 PM
5

If a woman did the same with a "feminist" sub, there would've been no consequences, maybe not even the deletion of the comment, instead dozens of gold awards. Mods are very trigger happy when it comes to something not aligning perfectly with the feminazi propaganda. I was permabanned from a sub because I said that murder is a worse crime than rape and women who use the #killallmen are not better than men using the #rapeallwomen, and if the latter is not a joke, then the first one is not a joke, …
/r/MensRights24/02/21 11:45 PM
15

For a woman yes also means rape if she changed her mind after the fact.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 05:43 PM
4

I guess rape culture does exist, it's just not what feminists claim it is.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 04:25 PM
7

That wouldn't work because the "feminist" logic says that consent can be taken back even retroactively. You could literally record the entire thing and ask the woman every five seconds if she's still consenting, and feminists could call it rape anyway. Many already redefined rape to mean sex when the woman is not perfectly happy with not just the sex but the man in general, even long after the fact.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 07:48 PM
4

You know some group of people hold too much power when the burden of proof is not on the accuser to prove a crime but the accused to prove that something didn't happen. Especially because it's impossible to prove something like that unless you were in another country or something.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 07:43 PM
4

BBC pushes the feminazi propaganda for quite some time now, it's not surprising they don't want to cover a story when a woman drives a man into suicide, that doesn't align with the narrative.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 07:35 PM
34

for most of history men were given respect and authority in exchange for all the responsibilities taken on Except all those men who developed PTSD or something else were called a coward and got shot instead of entertaining the idea of mental illness and sending them home to heal. And even when that went out of fashion, they still couldn't find acceptance in society or even medical help, only the get over it "treatment". War was always a fucking meat grinder on every side.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 08:08 AM
125

Imagine using statistics instead of the anecdotes of your third cousin's high school roommate's sister-in-law's former PE teacher's best friend on Facebook.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 05:22 PM
35

That 25% chance of a kidnapping, rape, and/or murder is crazy Well, it fits the modern day feminist claims that women are systematically oppressed, raped and killed by men, so pointing out such things won't help. The problem is way deeper.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 05:18 PM
20

The last thing you wanna do when talking to a suicidal person is have an opinion, and definitely can't assume it's a joke. I wonder how many people who didn't want to actually die call a suicide hotline and decide to actually go through with suicide because of an asshole like that.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 09:02 AM
4

And when you're a man and try to talk about your feelings, they just say "oh shut up, just man up already", and if you cry, they just ridicule you, including adults even if you're a teen.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 08:49 AM
1

And apparently saying that murder is worse than rape is worth a permaban over there. Yep, that's modern feminism for you. Edit: so, the "reason" they provided was brigading. I said that I literally can't do brigading alone and they can't ban me for expressing a valid opinion about which crime is worse. They replied yes they can, and they did exactly that, and banned me from contacting the mods as well. This is why you can't and won't ever get anywhere. Even the mods acknowledge that they banned …
/r/MensRights16/02/21 09:29 PM
16

The people under that post clearly show the problem, "men can't complain about anything, if they do, they're anti-feminists, women can't do anything wrong, if they do... no, they don't, they can't" basically.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 08:56 PM
8

Ah, yes, the systemic murder of women, of course.
/r/PussyPass12/02/21 11:55 PM
5

When a woman says somebody raped her days, weeks, months, years ago, how do they prove it? They often don't but men go to prison anyway, or even when they drop the case, they still spend a lot of time locked away as legally innocent people.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 12:52 AM
4

Of course not, women want to force men into paying after a kid they never wanted, asked for, knew about, and had no say in whether the kid is kept or not.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 12:50 AM
30

Finally some progress. But still sad that it had to go that high and it's still only a 3-2 decision.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 11:48 PM
10

"How can I best defend men’s rights in this situation without risking my grade?" Sadly, you probably can't, unless you have a very good and female lawyer.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 11:21 AM
10

I saw that video, I think this was posted here earlier. He has many good points, and definitely not anti-feminist. Yep, found the full video in my history. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTHgMxQEoPI (the full video button on the website only starts playing the 36 seconds of the video for me)
/r/MensRights09/02/21 04:26 PM
15

Dying in a routine surgery is bad enough, but dying in a totally unnecessary routine surgery forced on you by your parents is just one of the worsts.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 10:06 PM
1

And it wasn't men who pushed through policies to allow women in the US military to wear makeup and have a ponytail in uniform.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 09:31 PM
7

If magic was real, they'd kill each other in ways we can't even imagine.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 09:29 PM
5

I was permabanned from r/TrollXChromosomes for writing under a post saying all men are either rapists or enable rapists that that claim is as good as an urban legend, rape is universally considered to be bad.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 09:26 PM
4

"the same ones used to justify racism, homophobia and religious and cultural intolerance" Yep, as Mark Twain said; History doesn't repeat itself but it often rhymes.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 09:12 PM
7

A typical case of the law lagging behind technology, so they make quick and dirty patches to it as a workaround.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 11:15 AM
1

Motherly instincts, more like not being able to not fuck around and not being a grown ass person to take responsibility for the consequences.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 11:10 AM
6

What the actual fuck!? Fortnite skins when?
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:00 PM
2

Ah, yes, if you're a man and say that women in monogamist relationships shouldn't sleep with other men, you're a sexist, misogynist asshole who doesn't understand that women need freedom and doesn't deserve relationships, but if you're a woman not even in a relationship yet, you get to be offended by a grown ass man watching porn. Fuck this.
/r/PussyPass05/02/21 11:30 AM
4

Yeah, I'm not touching a woman or a kid to help them, letting somebody die vs the chance of getting crucified as a rapist/pedophile... I won't play the hero justified in his actions only after feminists drove him to suicide, if it can happen, I'm avoiding that. Hell, I even keep my arms visibly raised to my chest in a crowd if there are women around.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 01:47 PM
11

A good example of a woman who should not be allowed to have kids.
/r/PussyPass29/01/21 07:01 PM
16

And if you do come home as a man but still can't vote because you're not from the right social status, can't drink a beer because you're still not 21 yet, never fit in because mental health is still taboo, things like PTSD is not even an idea yet and everybody just says you should man up and deal with it, if you're also deformed, burned or missing a limb, people are even disgusted looking at you; and if you can't even find a job, nobody will rush to help you out, you can die slowly in a ditch so…
/r/MensRights27/01/21 03:28 PM
27

You know there is a problem when even psychologists complain. You'd expect that field to be different.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 04:26 PM
2

That's one way to say fuck off. Also, "relay [...] to the communications team", so "if nothing happens, don't blame me."
/r/MensRights24/01/21 04:03 PM
73

r/pussypassdenied
/r/PussyPass22/01/21 06:06 PM
27

Also, how do you do paid house work? I'd really like to get paid for cleaning my apartment but I live alone and it has to be done, so unless I pay myself for it... but even if you don't live alone, you don't expect your partner to pay for it if they don't have the time or just suck at it, and it has to be done still.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 02:08 PM
26

Try that quiz. Apparently if you're a man and you're hungry, your only option not to be sexist is to open the fridge and start cooking. Can somebody who knows about fallacies count how many is in there? I know it's not normal when your only options to choose from are stupid, stupid and what they want to hear.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 02:01 PM
3

In high school there were three girls who always found great pleasure in messing with me. Didn't know it then but I have BPD, they figured out something's not right and enjoyed it very much. Later I new a girl who said to me she had leukemia, just for "fun" to see how I react and to mess with me. I had a girlfriend who used me only to get her father to pay for the school she wanted to go, she convinced me she was abused and beaten at home... it was all a lie, she went as far as to cause bruises …
/r/MensRights22/01/21 10:57 AM
1

That's very much needed, so many men avoid screenings because of how... not great the process is.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 10:58 PM
2

17 hours and got a permanent ban from the entire page! 🤣 Modern feminists.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 04:36 PM
10

Women can't rape anybody, they don't have a penis to penetrate with. Everybody knows only that counts as rape. /s
/r/MensRights19/01/21 10:56 PM
17

Here's an experiment. I commented that there's no rape culture, a woman just has to say she's been raped for the rapist to get locked up and his life end, even if it was a false accusation. I wonder how long does it take to have it removed.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 10:53 PM
71

Well said
/r/MensRights19/01/21 10:44 PM
2

How else would you provide equal opportunities to everybody and get the best people for any given job regardless of their gender? Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights19/01/21 12:32 PM
3

Tell them that only the truly primitive and the dictators punish people for things done by their ancestors. Don't even have to add that especially when most of those things are made up.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 08:13 PM
3

Glitter is very dangerous and can easily blind you, damage your lungs or even kill you. This should be a very serious criminal offense. People loved her revenge stunt and even added their own suggestions. One said: "Put it in his shampoo and conditioner." A second wrote: "Hear me out... on top of the fan blades for an expected surprise." What the fuck is wrong with people!?
/r/MensRights16/01/21 04:55 PM
64

That's a well known fact in Europe that tourists in general are the primary target of countless scammers and robbers, some even show signs of being organized. As a young man you don't even have to be a tourist, if a young woman approaches you out of nowhere, better be on the defensive, women barely ever initiate anything without ulterior motives. Can't comment on the same for women, but I think they're encountering assholes mostly in search of somebody easy, different motivation, no idea how dan…
/r/MensRights16/01/21 03:30 PM
1

I really doubt they only searched IE, that's impossible unless you're ordered not to look elsewhere and you comply, or to forget what you saw and comply.
/r/PussyPass12/01/21 10:34 AM
2

Divide et impera
/r/MensRights11/01/21 03:48 PM
-14

Where does it say the woman got away with it?
/r/MensRights06/01/21 01:04 PM
5

You're trying logic here, that's not how these people operate.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 05:43 PM
2

It's rare to see this much self-hatred and projection that's coming from this John Stoltenberg guy, there must be plenty of skeletons in his closet that he makes up so much bullshit to try to cope with it.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 05:42 PM
5

Religion should never have to be a consideration when making laws, the protection from an involuntary and irreversible body modification that's not necessary and could be dangerous easily falls under the human rights' protection from degrading treatment. In fact the human rights that protect religious freedom also contradict circumcision because that's forcing a religion onto somebody who can't have a say in it and it's also a potential health issue because it is, again, an involuntary, unnecess…
/r/MensRights01/01/21 03:13 PM
7

<sarcasm> We all know women can't be pedophiles so when she initiated a sexual relationship with a prepubescent child, it was only because nobody paid attention to her, so basically it's her husband's fault, or ex-husband's, or ex-boyfriend's, or whatever man's she had last in her life. </sarcasm>
/r/MensRights30/12/20 07:16 PM
14

The article only called it rape because officially she pleaded guilty to "first and second degree child rapes", but the article called it molesting, relationship, romps, and abuse. Overall it's not repeating words, however there is serious bias because when it's a man pedophile doing the rape, you can't even count how many times they write the words rape and pedophile. The latter isn't there in the article by the way, nobody's calling her pedophile even though this clearly classifies as pedophil…
/r/MensRights30/12/20 07:08 PM
23

Why is there a concept for a primary caregiver, anyway? It really shouldn't matter who stays at home with the kid, if somebody does, or just spends more time with them or whatever the criteria are, that alone doesn't and shouldn't mean that the other parent is not as important and doesn't care for the kid in every way possible.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 04:00 PM
27

No, a military draft is when a country requires men to join the military, it doesn't have to be wartime. Really nothing stops even the US to draft every 18-year-old boy for no reason, many countries still have it and many more only did away with it not long ago.
/r/PussyPass23/12/20 09:40 PM
-3

Not really, a draft only means you have to join the military, it's not necessarily only during wartime. Any country where it became voluntary already can decide at any time that from now on men have to join at the age of 18 again.
/r/PussyPass23/12/20 09:36 PM
1

So, in straight monogamy women can have sex with whoever they want and the man can't be upset about it or expect a woman to be with only one man, also men having friends in not okay. Can the feminazi relationship delusions get any more fucked up?
/r/MensRights23/12/20 09:23 PM
7

Saying that she didn't commit homicide because she's bipolar is a pussy pass. There's nothing in bipolar disorder that can make you not know that killing a baby is wrong, and that's the difference between being guilty or not. She's either psychotic and possibly hallucinating or guilty of homicide. If they're telling she's only bipolar, then she's guilty of homicide. This would come up if it was about a man.
/r/PussyPass17/12/20 06:18 PM
32

Being bipolar doesn't mean you're ever in a state where you can't tell that strangling a baby is a wrong thing to do, a bipolar person is never psychotic or hallucinating, that's not part of any of the symptoms. The worst thing a bipolar person can do where you don't blame them is suicide, but not homicide.
/r/PussyPass17/12/20 06:13 PM
2

Or, instead of creating quotas left and right and arguing about how many women they hire, they should just hire the best suitable person for a given job and not care about gender. What? That would be truly equal and not pander to any group? Oh, my bad, I always forget this has never been about equality, at least not for the past decade or so.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:38 PM
4

I always wonder if women who try to claim that women can't rape man are incredibly stupid or actually rapists themselves.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 02:40 PM
1

So women are either equal to men or they can't deal with the same circumstances and don't deserve the same rights. You can't have it both ways.
/r/PussyPass11/12/20 04:22 PM
2

If had to guess I'd say the girls are still treated as brave heroines and the guy probably hang himself by now.
/r/PussyPass24/11/20 03:45 PM
1

Guilty until proven innocent is pretty much how law works, the "innocent until proven guilty" what you probably meant to write only means you're not sentenced to jail/prison/death until you are.
/r/PussyPass24/11/20 03:38 PM
6

To be honest the USA is the same in this regard. A woman says rape without any truth to it and an innocent man's life is over.
/r/PussyPass05/10/20 08:19 PM
10

That's an even better situation. You can just say you're a female spirit trapped in a male body and society's rules won't apply to you, in fact you might get compensation for being the victim.
/r/PussyPass04/07/18 08:12 PM
8

She chased after another car, the children became frightened and started screaming, then she proceeded to leave her children in the car while she attacked the other driver. So, she's obviously a bad parent but don't send her to jail for committing a crime because she has children, think of the children! /s stormed up to Ms Geary's window before screaming: 'You f***ing bitch. You don't know who I am. I'm going to kill you.' Opening with that followed by an assault isn't more than just an assault?
/r/PussyPass10/05/18 06:44 AM
12

Yeah, who the hell cares about the homeless? In fact, she did a public service by killing one of them. /s But seriously, Granada's windshield was partially obstructed with snow and ice. Shouldn't that alone warrant more than 30 days of probation? It wasn't an accident if it was caused by her being careless and probably breaking laws by driving her car while unable to see the road properly. Hitting that guy was vehicular manslaughter. She told police her heater and defroster was not working in th…
/r/PussyPass04/05/18 12:43 PM
6

Nope. She was driving while her view was obstructed by ice and snow, something she could've removed from the windshield before even starting the car. I'm pretty sure there's laws against driving like that in every western country/state, so the death of the Can Man resulted from her breaking laws.
/r/PussyPass04/05/18 12:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter