TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Odysseus_is_Ulysses Archive

View 0 posts and 73 comments by Odysseus_is_Ulysses on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Umm, okay, go to any incel sub and tell me it’s not just a circle jerk of guys hating women for existing. There’s a reason why the “incel” original sub no longer exists. They’re toxic, hateful people.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 11:14 AM
1

I appreciate your attitude towards it but I also understand how for some people it might just be a bit too much visually. Yes it’s harmless but the image of fucking with blood getting everywhere can be a bit of a daunting thing. Whichever view you have though, it’s not like that means guys are straight up “ew no periods gross” generally they know it’s a natural thing that can’t be helped and will still be caring and conscious of that time of the month even if they’re not comfortable having sex d…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/19 07:38 AM
73

Sexism isn’t really necessary is it?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 06:23 PM
-5

I never said anything about men existing to solve women’s problems. But MGTOW stopped being about men just doing their own thing and basically became an Incel subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 01:05 PM
5

I’m finding it hard to believe that a support group laughed at the mention of cutting themselves. Also they laughed throughout his story? Why would he carry on if it’s clear he’s being ridiculed. I don’t believe it, but I’ll get downvoted for saying it because people on this sub have become bloodthirsty wanting to find any reason made up or not to scream men are treated poorly. While it’s true that men are stereotyped harshly in certain situations, it loses meaning when we believe any line of te…
/r/MensRights26/07/19 07:53 AM
4

Love the downvotes for asking an honest question. I’ve upvoted you and I’ll say it’s likely either other drugs were used as well as viagra (knock them out while maintaining an erection) or they were blackmailed or otherwise coerced into having sex.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 07:51 AM
-23

It literally isn’t because of feminism. This sub is becoming a new MGTOW at times, some people definitely don’t sound like they want equality, but to keep one gender above the other or to plainly attack the other gender for being the other gender. I’m all for supporting people who have been thought less of due to being a man, but it’s worrying how many MGTOW posts I’ve been seeing on here recently.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 07:49 AM
3

I’ve never heard of this being the reason for Germany’s wide scale antisemitism. Do you have a source so I can read up further please?
/r/MensRights24/07/19 11:48 AM
19

Yeah like, I get that bad things are committed on both sides, but that shit with the Jews... bit extreme.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 10:33 AM
28

Honestly, why the fuck should someone feel like they want to put their life on the line for others when they’re just going to get shit on for being white and a man.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 12:03 PM
4

I mean, just because it’s the legal age of consent it doesn’t mean you can’t use common sense. Not only is it likely a large age difference, but it’s a teacher. Someone who’s meant to be responsible and act as a guardian for that student. It’s not okay and shouldn’t have happened. It’s honestly shocking that they faced no punishment for this.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 02:06 PM
1

No. I’m not deflecting, I’m just refusing to repeat myself anymore. I’ve had to repeat answers to questions multiple times because people seem incapable of reading my previous comments. I’m not a record player.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 08:48 AM
1

Ah I see you’ve misunderstood completely. I’ve used an example that isn’t extreme, but that happens to over 10,000 people a year. But that’s irrelevant, because the comment you’ve highlighted refers to the fact that pro life advocates seem to believe that the mass of cells is alive and conscious and a human since conception, and that the change from mindless mass to conscious human couldn’t possibly happen at any other point, which it actually does. I hope this cleared things up and you understa…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 09:52 AM
1

I’ll let you read my comments and figure that out for yourself. You’re all very good at asking questions I’ve already answered. Learn to read the previous response before spouting your next question.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 09:49 AM
1

25 weeks
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 11:49 PM
0

How is that relevant to my comment?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 06:41 PM
0

A baby doesn’t develop the brain activity required for consciousness until week 24-35, which is the cut off point for abortions. Edit: also since you pinned the subject, “or should we resort to name calling now” implies that you took me referring to you as “you people” as name calling.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 05:33 PM
1

I answered that some point IN THE WOMB, that’s not a baby half way through the birthing process is it? And it’s not my opinion, it’s when the brain forms, it’s science. And you people is not name calling, get off your high horse. You people refers to pro life advocates because I’m not going to say “pro life advocates” every time am I? you wanna be petty and start claiming I’m calling you names, then you’re clearly not ready for the discussion. Edit: and your extreme position is either the baby i…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 05:17 PM
1

Jesus Christ, why does it always have to be an extreme or nothing with you people. I was very clear if you bothered to read it. There is a point in the 9 months of pregnancy that the baby gains a consciousness. Past that point abortions don’t happen. Before that point, the mass of cells is not conscious nor sentient, and is therefor aborted. I clearly said I wouldn’t be okay with a baby with a consciousness being aborted.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 05:06 PM
1

That “life on Mars” would not be considered a conscious mass. The “life” in the womb in the first few weeks isn’t sentient. Also it takes two to tango, it’s not “women’s lack of responsibility”. It’s people’s lack of responsibility.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 05:01 PM
3

Did you want to read my comment? No? Just ignore it and ask pointless questions? Cool cool. I’ve already stated my opinion on a baby that’s currently being pushed out of a vagina in the previous comment.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 04:58 PM
2

I’d vote against it, because a baby after a certain point in the womb gains the ability to think and feel. There’s also all the time before that were it’s about as living as a plant for all the activity the cells are doing. After a certain point you’re aborting a living conscious person. Before that point, you’re not.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 04:55 PM
1

Because those examples are what you seem to ignore. The extreme examples happen, whether you like it or not. Pro life people just seem to ignore it because they don’t want an abortion. Don’t have an abortion if you don’t want one, but don’t make a rape victim suffer because you think killing non-conscious cells is murder.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 04:42 PM
1

So that’s 12,500 people you’re condemning to a child they didn’t want nor plan nor “accidentally” have. It was forced upon them. How in any world is that okay? How can you advocate that?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 04:40 PM
1

So basically no, people don’t abort fully grown babies.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 04:34 PM
0

He provided a statistic without any source at all. Get a fucking clue. You can’t just throw out a random piece of information with absolutely no source and expect it to be taken as gospel.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 04:11 PM
1

This is a bill that has been passed and is in practice now?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 04:10 PM
0

Could you supply a source for that please. I’ve not heard of that statistic before. But I suppose because of that, if true, just fuck rape victims? That’s a healthy opinion...
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 04:01 PM
1

You’ve ignored the comment regarding the rape victim. Any thoughts on that or you just gonna gloss over it?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 03:36 PM
1

A rape victim choosing they don’t want a rapists baby gets karma for getting an abortion? Makes so much sense. Also advocating is what you’re doing. You’re publicly supporting your view. Nice effort to talk down to someone but you sound like a tart. You’re a psychopath.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 03:35 PM
-2

No, one of those adults are a victim of rape. Kinda throws a spanner in the works doesn’t it. What you want effects every pregnancy, not just your ideal scenario of a pregnancy. Edit: and yes, if you stop someone from getting an abortion, you’re the one allowing a child to be born into the world.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 03:32 PM
-2

Nah, people advocating the maiming of a woman hurts. It hurts that people as psychotic and messed up as you exist in the world.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 03:25 PM
1

Yes. It bothers me that people want to remove a mother’s right to choose what she wants to do with her body regarding the removal of an informed cluster of cells in her womb. I think if someone is pro-life, they should be required to adopt an unwanted child as they’ve caused that child to exist in the world.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 03:25 PM
11

Do you think they abort fully formed babies?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 03:18 PM
-3

You’re fucked in the head.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 03:17 PM
-15

There’s no difference. Unless you’re reading pro-abortion as someone who believes everyone should be having abortions regardless of whether they want the child or not, which is moronic.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 03:17 PM
7

How is he at fault because the person he’s addressing is basically ignorant?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:16 AM
3

He doesn’t redeem himself because he didn’t do anything wrong. He asks if she’ll come to him, as she also has the right to do. But not being willing to meet half way is what puts someone in the wrong, in this case, the girl.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/19 09:50 AM
21

Regardless, it’s fucked up that if a woman were to force herself upon me, she could do whatever she liked and wouldn’t be classed as a rapist.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 11:17 PM
1

That may be but it shouldn’t be a jail sentence for either gender. That’s what I said.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 05:08 PM
1

The problem is that they’re grouped together as “cops”. A hundred cops do their job by the book, then one shoots someone unfairly. Now the other hundred cops are just as evil according to us.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 09:18 AM
3

No it shouldn’t. Whether it was a man or a woman this wasn’t worth jail time. You go to prison and your life is instantly a million times more difficult when you get out. This woman was just being a dipshit, but she’s young and dumb. She’s probably learnt her lesson with the sentence she was given.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 09:16 AM
10

It’s not really much of a loophole then because everyone’s gonna use the code regardless of gender. They’re basically losing more money than they intended by being sexist.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 04:54 PM
3

“Here is all of my legal documentation showing I’m allowed my child” takes child
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:25 AM
11

That’s so fucked.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 04:45 PM
137

Fake or not, one of the replies was saying that a guy does not legally own his sperm. Is that true? It’s a weird concept to begin with but like, if a woman extracted sperm from a condom you had used and took it to a sperm bank, would you be powerless in that situation? I just feel really dumb for asking and being so clueless.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 01:08 PM
1

Yeah I came looking for these comments. Again the message is good but the execution with this panel is shit.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 11:25 AM
3

I just love how these days it seems to have become completely acceptable to specify that the target is “white” and yet this doesn’t get backlash for being racist? If it was specified “black male” people would freak out claiming racism
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:17 AM
14

That’s just as harmful a statement. Stop fucking grouping the two genders into 2 definitive categories. People want everyone to know their problems and feel sorry for them, both men and women do it. Not everyone, but some from both genders. What you just said was sexist plain and simple.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 11:22 AM
3

You can’t go wrong with a bit of Jezzer
/r/MensRights27/10/18 03:02 PM
18

I had the condom break before when having sex with a friend. The next day I told her I’d go and get the morning after pill because she was too embarrassed to go in. I was refused service and told that she had to come in herself, and when she did (I came with her) they took her to a private room to have a chat with her. I don’t know what the chat was about but I got some proper dirty looks while I was standing there not saying anything.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 04:11 PM
54

God forbid it’s the other way round though? You prefer taller girls? You’re a scum bag for not being happy with a woman no matter her height.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:41 AM
1

“A bit vague to judge” implying if it was from a specific gender it’s not as bad the other?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 04:47 PM
1

Is doesn’t matter who it was from?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 04:45 PM
6

But the point is that if women went into the field, there’s be more women in the field. In this day and age there’s a lot less stopping a woman from going into whatever field she wants
/r/MensRights14/08/18 09:02 AM
4

So, she could buy a car, but they take 3 of her tires and the gear stick?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 10:42 AM
1

So many people here saying “men are stronger than women”. What bullshit is that! Yeah biologically men are stronger at a base level, but that means fuck all in the long run. There are fuck tons of men that are weaker than women, and the same for women that are weaker than men. Why just because a man has a higher threshold for strength should he have to reach higher standards than women. It should be an equal baseline for both genders.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 10:39 PM
1

Try reading the comment then. He says “young singer” suggesting its the fact she’s a singer that makes it sad.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:00 PM
3

I still do karate now and believe me, both men, women, boys and girls are more than capable of doing way more than 10 push ups
/r/MensRights16/07/18 10:44 AM
17

In the British RAF women are required to do 10 press ups where men are required to do 20, and men had to do 35 sit ups while women had to do a lesser amount (I can’t remember specifically). They were also required to score lower than what men were required on the bleep test.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 09:47 PM
31

Oh god you’re a child abuser or something aren’t you? Someone with this mentality can’t be safe around kids
/r/MensRights05/07/18 09:12 AM
19

This woman seems like she just wanted any reason to disagree with this guy. He makes constant good and balanced points that seem very unbiased. Yet she tries to twist his words at every turn.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 01:50 PM
2

Just wear the fucking uniform
/r/MensRights20/05/18 03:32 PM
32

She made the post because of the fact she realised she compliments women more than she compliments men. Sounds like she was routing for equality to me.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:51 PM
4

No he’s not.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 07:56 AM
1

Yes it’s “breast cancer”. Both men and women can get breast cancer. If men wore makeup, it wouldn’t affect anyone. If a woman catcalled a man, they have the right to find in inappropriate and uncomfortable. What you’re saying is sexist towards both men and women.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:38 PM
1

Both women and men can catcall, and both can make someone uncomfortable. Both men and women can alter their appearance with make up and clothing etc. Which doesn’t directly affect another person. It’s not “male communication” it’s just communication, and normally an inappropriate form of it.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:22 PM
2

If a cat caller says it’s not targeted, then they’d be doing it when there’s no one around, which wouldn’t make sense. While makeup can be used with the intent to “woo” a specific person, it could be worn without the intention of seeing anyone that day. Catcalling has to be targeted at someone or a group of people.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:06 PM
-7

You’re already changing your tune. You’ve gone from exclusively to almost exclusively. Rich men have definitely gone around catcalling women. Some people will be rich and feel they can get away with that kind of thing.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:55 PM
-9

Wow you are straight out of the 1950’s. Could I get a source for “catcalling is more prevalent among African Americans” please. It being only lower class is such bollocks.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:41 PM
2

Because some people may like what they look like with makeup on, and therefore they feel good when wearing it. That’s something they do for themselves. I never said people don’t wear makeup for attention, but it’s something they’ve done to themselves that has no interaction with other people. It’s your choice if you choose to appreciate someone wearing makeup. Catcalling is you choosing to verbally interact with someone else whether they want you to or not. And saying it is silliness to wear mak…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:30 PM
-4

It does matter because wearing makeup is something you do for yourself, and literally is the easiest thing to ignore. Catcalling is targeted at someone else who may not want you doing it. You’re saying wearing makeup and catcalling are on the same level, when they’re obviously not.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:12 PM
4

Makeup doesn’t affect anyone else though. You can ignore someone with make up as it doesn’t directly address you. Someone catcalling you is focusing on you and can be upsetting or annoying and a lot harder to ignore.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 06:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter