TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Odz2427 Archive

View 0 posts and 289 comments by Odz2427 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It’s funny, reading through the comments they seem to think this situation is perceived to be the norm. Anywhere you look in TV and media it’s all about the man who “worships the ground she walks on” and that’s the key to why it works. The expectation is that the man should be willing to put up with so much while “empowered” women preach putting up with so little. Something like this comes along, where the man acknowledges he was mistaken and didn’t appreciate her enough and she made him realize…
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/20 11:42 PM
6

It’s the feminist narrative that makes some women feel that way. You shouldn’t be afraid of smiling at someone in public in broad daylight. Feminists trick women to believe that there is a realistic threat lurking around every corner.
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/20 06:09 AM
1

You’re making up statistics. That’s weird. Also, most clowns I talk to think exactly like you, so you only think what you think because you’re a clown. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 11:02 AM
1

Yeah. You think you can read minds. You’re a cartoon character.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 10:54 AM
1

You didn’t tell me you were a mind reader. That’s how you know so much about people’s motives and beliefs. We could have avoided this whole thing if you had only let me know. 😂😂😂😂😂😂 You’re adorable you clown.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 10:48 AM
1

I never said anything of the sort. I said that the majority of pro life people are religious. The majority of pro choice people are religious. This is because the majority of people are religious. The majority of people believing most opinions are religious. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 10:33 AM
1

“As for the number of people that believe something that is irrelevant - it has zero effect on whether that thing is correct.” Never said religion is correct. Only that most people are religious. This means that you can pick almost any opinion, and most people who believe it are also religious. This includes being pro choice. “But meaningless to any point you are desperately trying to make.” What point do you think I’m trying to make? “Most people who are pro choice are more left leaning and mos…
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 10:26 AM
1

“A few thousand” So you talk to people about abortion professionally? “I do not give a fuck about where it says anything in the Bible.” Hey, you’re the one who brought up the holy book. “the majority of people I have spoken to about abortion that claim to be pro-life are also religious.” That doesn’t mean religion is the reason they are pro life. I’ve got news for you. MOST PEOPLE BELIEVE IN A RELIGION. Most people who are pro choice are religious too. Correlation does not equal causation. Or di…
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 10:06 AM
1

“Most people I have spoken to” I guess while you were going over all the evidence, you never learned what the word “anecdotal” means. Since you’re so well researched, can you tell me where in the holy book it says that life begins at conception? “Not saying all are.” Well you said there’s hardly any reason to be pro-life other than religion so you sorta did. Believing that life begins at conception isn’t a religious view. It’s a perfectly reasonable idea held by all sorts of people.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 09:44 AM
1

“ROFL religion does not inform us of anything” Whoosh like a motherfucker.😂😂😂😂😂 You’re the one claiming that religion is the only reason for being pro life. So then people can determine when life begins without religion is what you are saying. Thank you for proving my point. You’ve been indoctrinated to believe that the pro life stance is purely a result of religion.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 09:23 AM
1

You realize that YOU are just a bunch of cells joined together, right?
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 08:53 AM
1

Neat. Some people think life begins at conception. Since only religion can inform when life begins, which religion taught you that it’s not a human life for the first month or two?
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 08:51 AM
1

Ok so there are a bunch of caveats that you added that you didn’t talk about originally. You just made a blanket statement about abortion. Secondly, does one need to be religious to think it is wrong to end an innocent human life. Because if you think a fetus is a human life....you see where I’m going. Lastly, is there ever a point in the day when you take a break from huffing paint?
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/20 06:30 PM
18

Yeah, only religious people can view a fetus as a life. /s The weird thing is thinking only religious people would be against abortions. You must be trolling.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/20 09:51 AM
1

The kid who got targeted by the whole group seems to be the only one who can throw a punch. Lotta “punches” that look like slaps.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 10:46 PM
7

Yeah, teaching a 3 year old about civil rights and standing up for herself and gender is too complicated for a child that age to understand. Chores are not.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/20 07:44 AM
2

Gotta love a feminist argument that involves the phrase “they shouldn’t be treated like men”.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/11/19 09:03 AM
11

I need masculinity because I like chocolate and my favorite color is green. There, I did one too.
/r/AntiFeminists08/09/19 01:04 AM
0

You mean to tell me you’ve never met an attractive woman?
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/19 06:42 AM
2

So men are 100% in charge of deciding whether or not to terminate the pregnancy?
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:04 AM
2

I’m saying It’s extraordinarily rare. You knew that
/r/MensRights13/06/19 03:43 PM
3

But women actually have the benefit of due process so it doesn’t happen. Also, they have the benefit of not believing men being the default position. It’s like instead of simply taking the “innocent until proven guilty stance” it’s more like “the accuser is framing the accused until proven not to be” with regard to men accusing women. Beyond that there’s the whole “boo hoo, get over it” mentality when men are victimized.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 10:04 AM
3

Reality implies that.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:57 AM
2

Yeah but in reality it’s more like robbery is legal for women so there’s no reason to check for bystanders. Let ‘em watch.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:55 AM
5

This is nonsense. If Ronda Rousey was the victim of some sexual misconduct by Danny Devito, you wouldn’t say “the implication is not the same” nor would anyone else. The fact that Rousey would be in the role of physically dominant typically held by men wouldn’t change anything. Yes the physical dynamics are different between the genders but wrong is wrong. You’re just arguing for preferential treatment for women, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:49 AM
5

I actually heard a woman complaining about how sad it is that the concept of the “she shed” had to be invented so that women could have a space for themselves. She sheds happened in response to men getting to have a man cave. Man caves happened because men wanted to claw back a little bit of the house for themselves and some women won’t stand for that.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:05 AM
1

No it doesn’t. Man caves impede women’s ability to monopolize every square inch of the home by oppressing them down to 90%.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:01 AM
5

Not if they birthed them but I don’t feel like getting into this.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 03:02 PM
7

People who “identify as fathers”?
/r/MensRights15/04/19 12:50 PM
2

Men make more money than women because of a sexist biased toward men. Employers know that men are foolish with money and women are very financially savvy. Since men are viewed as being weaker in this area employers feel sorry for them and and pay them more to make up the difference. Women are smarter and know how to handle money so employers aren’t worried about them.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 11:37 PM
2

Proof that anything can be anything when you want it to be.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 11:33 PM
7

Ok, so you're talking about late term abortions. You misrepresented that when you said "...women - even if their life depends on it- can't get an abortion in certain states". They CAN get abortions, however there are restrictions on how late into the pregnancy they are allowed to do so. ​ I figured as much. ​ Edit: actually, according to your source, "when their life depends on it" women are allowed to get an abortion even in late term scenarios in every state.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 09:56 AM
2

Which states? What exactly are you referring to?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 09:05 AM
5

Are you suggesting that women have 20% more lower body strength than men or is this a joke I missed?
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/19 01:57 AM
1

Whiff
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:02 AM
3

I get not liking individuals in the feminist movement who say things counter productive and unhealthy for men's rights. AKA the majority of feminists. Women who just want simple equality, typically don’t associate themselves with feminism.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 06:53 PM
-2

Are you directing that at the feminists?
/r/MensRights08/12/18 06:51 PM
0

Math kinda already is racist according to snowflake. That is if you include data analysis under math.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 07:49 PM
5

It’s about them vs us because feminists made it that way long ago. Feminism is meant to be at men’s expense. At least in practice.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 07:47 AM
5

Posts like this have nothing to do with why men’s rights is viewed as a joke. The reason is that men have been vilified as the oppressors to such a great degree that the idea of men having unique issues and problems is the target of ridicule to many.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 07:46 AM
2

Or it’s just kind of a joke. Nothing wrong with being light-hearted sometimes.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 07:44 AM
27

If all the seats were filled with feminists it never would have been able to get off the ground.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:43 AM
1

Is that a TPB reference?
/r/MensRights25/08/18 08:50 AM
3

I don’t think you understand what “Orwellian” means.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:08 PM
1

Scary how common her opinion is.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 03:22 AM
2

Triggered by an emoji. FOR LIKE THE FOURTH TIME!!!!! Right on cue. I’m bored now. You’re done. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/MensRights05/06/18 11:03 PM
3

🤔
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:43 PM
2

I wish you would scroll back through the conversation and see how few words have set you off. I’ve hardly said anything and you’ve written a book out of fury.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 07:03 AM
1

Man you shouldn’t base so much of your self worth on internet interactions. Seems to be causing you a great deal of grief. You’re done.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 05:53 AM
2

😍 You’re my favorite, but there’s no need to get your panties in an uproar.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:15 AM
1

😂
/r/MensRights05/06/18 03:42 AM
1

💩
/r/MensRights04/06/18 11:31 PM
1

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights04/06/18 12:40 AM
-1

How sad for you.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 02:55 AM
0

“/s” You dropped something.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 02:24 AM
2

“/s” You dropped something.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:18 PM
11

Doesn’t the BLS look solely at the US?
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:17 PM
2

Well, we found an exception. Burn that graph.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:16 PM
2

They forgot the trigger warning. I apologize on their behalf.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:45 PM
4

I know it’s not equal. False accusations are far worse than a slap in the ass. I didn’t say it was nothing. I said it was nothing compared to falsely accusing someone of rape. A false accusation of rape can ruin a man’s life. A single slap on the ass has never done that to anyone ever. NOT ONE SINGLE TIME. YOU are bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 08:33 PM
6

OK....so anyone that levels an accusation that can be determined to be false should have charges brought against them? No Yes it should. What the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 07:27 PM
7

A false accusation of rape does FAR more damage to the accused than a single slap on the ass does to the victim. You’re right about the two not being comparable. A slap on the ass is nothing compared to a false accusation of rape.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 07:26 PM
8

That sounds perfectly reasonable. Obviously he did.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 09:21 PM
1

And in other news, grass is green.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:11 PM
1

Diversity is a tool that a business has every right to utilize. Agreed. Where we disagree is that genitalia should be factored in.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 08:03 AM
3

💩 And I stopped reading when I got to the point that was 100% nonsense. You're more than a bit ignorant if you don't recognize that differing physical attributes in our society result in diversity of experience and perspective. Imagine now if that was used as an argument for why a woman shouldn’t receive a job. “You’re physical attributes have resulted in an experience and perspective that we don’t feel is a good fit for the position.” That’s literally the attitude that has been used historicall…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 06:23 AM
3

Diversity is a tool for evolution and potential improvement. I got to this part and I stopped. I know what I need to know. Diversity of skin color, ethnicity, and in this case genitalia for its own sake is utterly and completely meaningless. Diversity of thought, idea, intellect....that’s relevant. Having a vagina does nothing to achieve this. You’re done.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 05:54 AM
4

The data say otherwise to the first bit. As far as the rest, nobody is arguing that there weren’t injustices in the past. Currently there are countless programs in all sorts of organizations that go out of their way to make sure women are equally represented even when they are not equally qualified. Most of your argument is feelings.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:56 AM
1

I wonder what the response would be if everything in your comment was reversed for gender. More specifically, I wonder where the spike with your head on it would be planted.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:24 AM
1

metoo
/r/MensRights13/03/18 12:36 AM
1

Men have to prove their innocents all the time with rape cases. Why shouldn't he?
/r/MensRights13/03/18 12:36 AM
1

Why don't you give us some examples of those retards. They don't exist.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 12:34 AM
1

If you know for certain that someone is a victim then it is impossible not to believe them when they claim they've been raped. If he didn't mean "I believe everyone who claims to be a rape victim" then there would have been no point in saying it at all. It would make just as much sense to say "I believe dead people aren't breathing any more"
/r/MensRights13/03/18 12:33 AM
1

Still a victim of a crime. That was the point?
/r/MensRights13/03/18 12:30 AM
1

Wow you really hate guys who've been falsely accused of rape. That statement is every bit as fair as yours.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:25 AM
1

Also, whoosh again. You literally don't understand the point that was being made at all.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:24 AM
1

It's not trolling. It's making a point. He made a blanket statement about believing rape accusers and she made the point that sometimes false accusations are made. This sub has gone from "People should be presumed innocent until proven guilty" to "All rape victims are liars and screw everyone who supports them" A bigger load of bullshit has never exited someone's anus. The standard opinion these days (and on college campuses it's essentially a codified rule) "All rape accusations are 100% true 1…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:23 AM
6

Whoosh!!!
/r/MensRights11/03/18 09:52 AM
5

He missed the point so bad that he went all the way around and proved it. I can’t comprehend the kind of mind that went through the progression he showed there.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 09:50 AM
2

We have to believe women when they make accusations of sexual assault. It’s crucial.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 09:46 AM
1

K
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:20 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:11 AM
1

At least you’ve come to terms. Good for you I guess.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:09 AM
-1

Fingers crossed that you get to experience intercourse at some point in life.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:48 AM
4

Dude quit bitching
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:45 AM
2

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Your parents can’t do that. That’s not how it works. You’ve been an absolute delight. Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:11 AM
1

Your parents wish they aborted you. You still don’t understand the concept of men’s rights.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:00 AM
1

Nobody cares about you.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:58 AM
1

Wrong. I care about men’s rights. Nobody cares about your life. Not surprised at your confusion.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:52 AM
3

No right now it’s serving as evidence that your mother drank while you were in the womb. I can’t dumb my brain down anymore to get it across to you. You don’t understand what everyone else understands. You’re dumb. Your life has no value. Every day that you don’t kill yourself is a crime against humanity.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:47 AM
4

The point of this sub is to spread awareness. It is a forum. Go back to huffing paint.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:41 AM
3

Also, look up the word hypocrisy
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:34 AM
2

The discrepancy in homelessness is largely ignored. Women's rights issues are front and center. You literally get dumber by the post. Go again
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:32 AM
2

Show me feminists acknowledging female privilege.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:29 AM
2

The post is about hypocrisy you mentally challenge buffoon. You're the only one who doesn't instantly understand that. So no, I won't do that.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:28 AM
1

Or are you all just bitching that some women are inside? How someone can be so stupid to have that be the take away I’ll never know. That’s like an MRA saying “Women would be so much better off if more men were the victims of domestic abuse”. Nobody with a functional brain suggests either. Rinse repeat.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:25 AM
2

Yes, men experience homelessness more than women. Good answer to your own question.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:22 AM
9

How someone can be so stupid to have that be the take away I’ll never know. That’s like an MRA saying “Women would be so much better off if more men were the victims of domestic abuse”. Nobody with a functional brain suggests either.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 10:47 PM
5

Idk maybe find another sub. Seems pretty easy.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:58 AM
6

Did you come from /r/genericcomebacks lmao
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:18 PM
3

A shred of a percentage point maybe speaks out against women when they transgress. Hell they speak out exponentially more about women who choose to raise families and don't have careers because that is what they want to do with their life. Good luck finding them talking about equality when it comes to various forms of abuse and sexual misconduct etc.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 11:53 PM
2

Who is “they”? C’mon
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:31 PM
2

Feminists
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:30 PM
1

I got banned over there when I hadn’t made a comment in months simply because I participate in r/mensrights
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:28 PM
3

Most "Feminists" I've met only want to be treated the SAME as men, not to be given special treatment. Maybe this is true but the ones with a public voice tend not to fit in this category. Where are all the good feminists to disavow the blatant misandry at the head of their movement?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:27 PM
3

Same as men You are acting like miscarriages of justice only ever favor one gender. They favor women disproportionately. Hence the article and hundreds of other examples you can find in this sub. Of course she knew. She’s alive and has cognitive brain function. Her bragging about getting away with it only furthers the point.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:24 PM
6

They may not stand for it but they sure don’t speak out against it. And they never hesitate to bring up the inherent violent nature of all men.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:19 PM
5

So you ass raped her?
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:54 AM
-1

Adorable
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:52 AM
-1

Also, you don’t know what a phrase is. Thanks for the entertainment.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:07 AM
-1

Ha, whoosh again. The irony. Peace homie.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:06 AM
0

Ha, whoosh again. The irony. Peace homie.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:05 AM
0

Whoosh!!!
/r/MensRights14/12/17 11:49 PM
1

Jesus Christ dude. When a person doesn’t know how to solve a problem they sometimes have to seek out more than one source for a solution. How brain dead do you have to be to not be able to gather from the text that that was what he was trying to accomplish.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 10:52 PM
-1

Maybe that’s why he called “SO MANY” trying to find one that could help.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 10:17 PM
3

I hate to break it to you but this level of ignorance is rampant. I sincerely suggest coming to terms with it now. Look at it like this: there will be loads of people like this with whom you will compete for jobs. More often than not, those with the level head will soar right past these morons. Unless you are planning on going into politics or political activism in which case you may be best served to view this person as a role model. Only sorta /s.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:57 AM
5

So they are selfish, idiotic, jackasses who also happen to be cowards.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:02 AM
1

Correction. Involuntary plastic surgery. Fake boobs have an aesthetic appeal. Let’s force all women to get boob jobs!!! /s
/r/MensRights14/11/17 11:02 PM
3

You know what else depended on free speech? THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT. The first amendment is intended to protect offensive speech because once upon a time, the powers that be would have loved to throw people in jail for saying offensive things like”homosexuals are born that way”, “black people should be treated the same as white people” or further back “The earth is round”. This means your fragile little mind may have to be subjected to some hateful nonsense. But here’s the great thing: someone…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:06 PM
1

By the way my mom, my last girlfriend, and numerous women I have worked with would be perfectly fine with that statement. Only a fraction of women identify as feminists and of the group that doesn’t, a healthy chunk actively dislikes feminism. For example, most women who choose to make taking care of their family their prime focus(a fuck ton of women) actively dislike feminism because feminists shit on their chosen way of life.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:55 PM
1

You mean the perception of feminism might not be the same as reality? Do tell. And the reaction does not equal reality. On numerous occasions I have spoken to female friends who considered themselves feminists and then I ran down several modern day maniac feminist stances and asked if they agreed. They changed their tune a lot of the time. I don’t know why you think your little challenge proves a fucking thing. You can get assaulted and called a Nazi for showing support for trump. That doesn’t m…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:33 PM
2

We all need complete and unfettered free speech in order to be free. Restricting that is far worse and more dangerous than you having to hear SCARY WORDS.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 09:10 AM
4

You equate “free speech” with hate groups. Shove your self righteousness up your pee hole. I’ll respond to whatever I want and you’ll do exactly nothing about it. That’s how free speech works. I wouldn’t expect a weeping snowflake to understand that.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 09:05 AM
2

How many penises have you gotten a good look at outside of porn. Unless you’re gay I’m not sure how much of a frame of reference you’d have.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 09:02 AM
3

Hating feminism is not the same as hating women
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:51 AM
1

Hating feminists is not the equivalent of hating women.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:47 AM
2

I don’t think this sub attracts too many feminists.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:41 AM
3

Free speech is not an alt right thing. The social justice warriors just try to frame it that way because they can’t stand free speech. It means they have to tolerate different opinions and those jackasses want nothing to do with tolerance.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:40 AM
4

It’s self evident. Think “boy who cries wolf”
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:35 AM
6

Another snow flake triggered by the term “free speech”. Fucking pathetic
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:34 AM
3

I love at the end when she says women get to men too late after they’ve already been infected with “toxic masculinity” to help them and that they’ve been raised wrong. What’s the name of that lady? The one who gets there earlier. Ahh...tip of the tongue...oh yeah MOM. Pretty sure women get there early. All of this is of course preposterous logic and her interview borders on trolling, but for fun I’ll follow her line of logic. Almost all children are raised in either a single parent home or a dua…
/r/MensRights11/11/17 10:31 PM
2

I shall call it “Patriarchy Day”
/r/MensRights11/11/17 04:59 AM
1

I read the article. The part about who has more orgasms was the least important part. If it’s true fine, no problem. I just had doubts. OP captured the spirit of the article. “Men get an ego boost from giving women orgasms. Shame on them.” It’s a cosmo article. It’s not real journalism that’s why I was skeptical about their stats on who has more orgasms. Reading the article just made me more skeptical.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 02:44 AM
1

"One reason is that it might pressure some heterosexual men to feel like they have to 'give' women orgasms, as if orgasm is something men pulled out of a hat and presented to women," they wrote. "This ties into cultural ideas of women as passive recipients of whatever men give them." So they're just gonna ignore the fact that since the dawn of human existence sex, in general, has been treated like something that women give and men take. Cosmo is a fucking nonsense factory.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 08:10 AM
2

I love that getting a self-esteem boost from making a woman feel good is being turned into some sort of toxic masculinity bullshit argument. Isn't it possible that this is an evolutionary mechanism to incentivize men to bring more pleasure to a woman, thereby incentivizing women to want sex more for the continuation of the species?
/r/MensRights04/11/17 08:05 AM
1

Maybe if they include masturbation but even then, I don't know.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 08:00 AM
2

They lose their husbands, sons, and fathers. What could be worse.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:59 AM
2

Because prostate cancer specifically and only harms men directly. (Edit: just like breast cancer disproportionately harms women, it's a natural connection) It stands to reason that there would be lower awareness among women because it does not concern them directly. Since the breast cancer organizations have done a good job of raising awareness it makes sense to piggyback and raise awareness in women. By targeting a group that is less likely to be intrinsically concerned you have an opportunity …
/r/MensRights18/10/17 09:27 PM
5

All the more reason to raise awareness no?
/r/MensRights18/10/17 09:13 PM
5

It makes absolute sense to compare the two in an attempt to raise awareness. Most people are abundantly aware of the risks of breast cancer. It's plastered all over the place, we devote a whole month to it where everything turns pink. If you point out that more men die of prostate cancer than women of breast cancer it gives the public a very familiar point of reference to understand the severity of the problem. That is exactly the point of ads and posts like this. It is not about competition. Th…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 09:08 PM
1

I
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:56 PM
1

That’s highly debatable
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:42 PM
2

That’s very much the minority
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:52 PM
1

I don’t have a problem with this joke. I’m not the one who posted it here. I think this kind of thing is funny. You obviously have deep insecurities about possibly being wrong so you are projecting opinions on me that you want me to have so you can argue with that and convince yourself you are right. Read what I actually said jackass.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:31 PM
2

Yes, and jokes like this should be able to go both ways. A similar joke from the male perspective would be met with indignation. That is the point every time something like this is posted. It is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard. This is simple stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:27 PM
2

They exist and are decreasingly acceptable because of feminist outrage.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:27 PM
1

It was appropriate.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:26 PM
3

Whoosh!!!
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:23 AM
2

Dude, stop spamming the thread with the same point that’s been made repeatedly and gets made every time someone posts something like this. Dude, stop missing the point entirely.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:05 AM
3

You might want to read up on the current state of feminism.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:03 AM
3

Yes, and jokes like this should be able to go both ways. A similar joke from the male perspective would be met with indignation. That is the point every time something like this is posted. It is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard. This is simple stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:52 AM
8

I like my beer like I like my violence....domestic.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:50 AM
7

Yes, and jokes like this should be able to go both ways. A similar joke from the male perspective would be met with indignation. That is the point every time something like this is posted. It is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard. This is simple stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:49 AM
6

Yes, and jokes like this should be able to go both ways. A similar joke from the male perspective would be met with indignation. That is the point every time something like this is posted. It is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard. This is simple stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:49 AM
3

Yes, and jokes like this should be able to go both ways. A similar joke from the male perspective would be met with indignation. That is the point every time something like this is posted. It is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard. This is simple stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:49 AM
5

Exactly no one doesn’t understand that it’s a joke. Jokes like this should be able to go both ways. A similar joke from the male perspective would be met with indignation. That is the point every time something like this is posted. It is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard. This is simple stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:45 AM
8

Everyone is aware of that
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:43 AM
8

Yes, and jokes like this should be able to go both ways. A similar joke from the male perspective would be met with indignation. That is the point every time something like this is posted. It is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard. This is simple stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:42 AM
4

Yes, and jokes like this should be able to go both ways. A similar joke from the male perspective would be met with indignation. That is the point every time something like this is posted. It is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard. This is simple stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:41 AM
4

Yes, and jokes like this should be able to go both ways. A similar joke from the male perspective would be met with indignation. That is the point every time something like this is posted. It is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard. This is simple stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:40 AM
8

Yes, and jokes like this should be able to go both ways. A similar joke from the male perspective would be met with indignation. That is the point every time something like this is posted. It is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard. This is simple stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:38 AM
1

Also nice job of missing the point entirely.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:42 PM
1

And all the grammar nazis should kill themselves because they can't think critically and have to resort to the most meaningless of insults to make themselves feel better.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:35 PM
2

Maybe you should tell that to the nut job activists that made the bathroom into a huge ordeal. It sure as shit wasn't MRA's genius.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:51 AM
3

door
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:49 AM
-4

And yet there's still a door marked specifically for women.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:40 AM
-1

Why don't you go call the feminists a bunch of bitchy cunts?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:38 AM
11

Have you ever heard of feminism?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:37 AM
-1

I think it's more in response to the holy war that's been going on about bathrooms. Ya know, the one that men had nothing to do with?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:37 AM
2

I guess they've never seen the show. Can't believe the feminist outcry for GOT is the nicest, most innocent character engaging in mansplaining.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:50 PM
1

Fuckin' guy literally thought the term "alt-right" came from the phrase "alternative facts". Oh the stupidity is so thick and rich you could drizzle it over pancakes.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:24 PM
1

Why don't you do a quick google search before spewing ignorance everywhere. The term has been widely used for years. 😂👏😂👏😂👏😂
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:23 PM
3

No, I'm pretty sure he popped a blood vessel on that one.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:21 PM
0

I wouldn't. Why would you ask that. Oh, the whole, you being a fucking idiot thing.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:08 PM
1

"Alternative facts" was literally coined by the alt-right. It's the whole reason they are called the "ALT-right". Confirmed, you are that big of a fucking idiot. Here's an article from 2015. The term has nothing to do with Conway's comments. https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2015/11/we-are-alt-right-and-we-are-not-going.html?m=1
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:07 PM
0

Please tell me you're enough of a fucking idiot that you actually believed what you said. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:53 PM
1

The term alt-right existed long before she said that. You just made up a story out of thin air. Save it for your creative writing class.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:52 PM
2

"Alternative facts" was literally coined by the alt-right. It's the whole reason they are called the "ALT-right". Seriously? You're trolling right? Kellyanne Conway coined the phrase right after Trump was elected. And as far as the rest of it. You are on some straight strawman kool-aid kid.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:22 PM
1

SPECIAL ED!!!!!!
/r/MensRights05/08/17 06:52 AM
1

Special ed to boot.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 06:50 AM
10

Yeah, shouldn't somebody be taken to task for assuming that the woman is afraid and protecting the man. Isn't the message here that you're a woman and therefore too weak to stand up for yourself so we can't take your story seriously.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 10:02 PM
2

Yeah, these days you can get away with accusing anything of being guilty of any "-ism" just by saying "it seemed like", which is just a way of making an accusation to further an agenda without having to bother with pesky evidence.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 11:17 PM
3

"But even after a paternity test proved he wasn't the father, Cornejo is still being held liable for unpaid child support because a court says he did not contest the paternity suit when his former girlfriend first submitted it in 2003." This is all you need to know to understand what horse shit this is and be outraged.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 10:55 PM
1

And the "feel bad for them way" part is a pure concoction out of thin air. She makes it clear that rapist have it bad. There is exactly no indication that she feels bad for them. You just really, Really, REALLY, want her to be saying that for some strange reason.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:03 AM
1

You pulled a small chunk of her statement out and considered it stand alone. Considering the tone or context is exactly what I was telling you. She is arguing against the existence of rape culture by displaying how harshly our society treats rapists. That tone can be found throughout the statement. That is the tone. That is the context. I'm starting to think that you are a heavy believer in the idea of American rape culture and you are just entrenched in your original opinion, despite multiple p…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 11:57 PM
1

Murderers are sometimes given the death penalty. This is evidence that in the US we take the crime of murder very seriously because the punishment is harsh. Have I shown sympathy for murderers here or did I just acknowledge an indisputable fact that supports my hypothesis? Do you not understand context?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 09:36 PM
1

Yes I'm sorry. I was trying to respond to the same comment you did. My mistake.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 09:35 PM
0

Yes. I'm still looking for the part where she showed sympathy. She is arguing that rape culture does not exist in the west. The fact that rapists get treated that way is evidence that supports her claim. It only reads the way you read it because you want it to.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 12:43 PM
2

I didn't say feminism as a whole was good. I agree that feminism has contributed mightily to women being less happy. I also know, with 100.00% certainty, as an iron clad, indisputable fact that women are not less happy because they have the option to vote and the option to work more jobs. I am equally certain that those very things have made women happier. I am a huge opponent of feminism especially in its current form but it's a little bizarre having to argue that winning fundamental rights was…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 06:15 AM
1

I agree with you but I'm not sure how it relates to what I said.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:26 AM
1

There was a lot more good in older versions of feminism though. I mean not being able to vote and being limited to a handful of career options were scenarios men created so much of their resentment was warranted. The white feathers thing was horse shit though for sure.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:21 AM
3

I don't like how this post shows pitty towards rapists. How can you dislike an event that never occurred?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:06 AM
1

http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0891/8314/products/South_Park_Nice__4fedd00c50250_grande.jpeg?v=1459067271 /s
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:13 AM
2

Vagina privilege
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:10 AM
4

The source is British. This happened in Delaware.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:09 AM
2

You think a judge would ever admit that? If she was male there would be flaming torches and pitchforks in her immediate vicinity right now.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:08 AM
6

Well of course. And don't forget about obese people who struggle greatly to walk up stairs. The very existence of stairs is a form of fat shaming.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:46 AM
8

This is correct. As soon as they step on they determine that use of the escalator is a micro-aggression against the stairs by making them feel inferior.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:28 AM
2

Those findings are not unique. That's right around the time most people settle down and start a family. And that's when many women start choosing to earn less.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:24 AM
10

A stunning argument. I think we're all convinced.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:19 AM
2

And on his 18th birthday the state gave him a bill for back child support.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 05:36 AM
1

Correct
/r/MensRights15/05/17 12:16 AM
1

Yeah, I'm sorry, you've whiffed on the point across the board. Cheers
/r/MensRights14/05/17 10:37 PM
3

Ok, so we'll all just swallow whatever she says because "I'm not what she is so I'm not allowed to have a thought on the matter. Bernie Madoff: "you're not a rich white man, you're not allowed to have an opinion". I hope you never get cancer. Only doctors who have survived cancer understand how to treat it.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 09:45 PM
4

Um, the same can be said for Lena Dunham. That is the point of this.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 09:24 PM
0

Show your work!
/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:26 PM
1

Ok, so where are all the feminists that fit the description you just offered? Because the only one's I ever see, at least in the public eye, are the ones you call "strawman". I would be interested to hear what the other ones have to say.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:23 PM
8

It would be fair to assume at a dinner party that a woman would be handling most of the work in the kitchen but if a man makes that assumption.....you know the rest.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:58 AM
1

I agree totally. Feminists often point to a dictionary definition of the word that very few actually live up to in practice. I was just saying that MRA's are more likely to live up to THAT definition.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 10:36 PM
1

Fair enough
/r/MensRights03/05/17 08:50 PM
1

Maybe we could say that most here are REAL feminists. By the dictionary definition, I think it's true. I don't think most people here identify as feminists because most women that make that claim really aren't feminists at all.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:56 PM
2

It's not all that anecdotal. It's indicative of common policy. Nobody here is surprised to read this story because it is far more common than you are letting on. This is not a competition of victimhood.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:54 PM
2

Isn't that what the feminists do around this topic constantly?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:53 PM
1

That's not the moral of the story.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:48 PM
1

Most of the time, the toilet seat is down. We don't need to make a habit of checking. Yes you do because sometimes it's not down. Yes you do because you are about to stick your ass on it. If you aren't checking before you sit then that means you don't see if there is piss on the seat and you are sitting in it. In other words if you don't check before you sit down you are gross.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:01 PM
5

Yes and women will have to touch the seat to lower it. The point of the comment you responded to is that a man shouldn't put his ass on the seat if he doesn't have to. It's not our fault that women have to sit every time. Although I'm sure there are feminists out there that would argue that it is.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:48 AM
3

Some people don't understand humor
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:33 AM
11

Humor has value
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:31 AM
5

How exactly?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:28 AM
20

Here's what I don't get. Women sit down every time they go to the bathroom. As a man, I sit down idk maybe 15% of the time. In my entire life, including childhood, I have never once sat down with the seat still up. I believe this is probably true for most men. When I am in the habit of doing something the same way every time, I feel like I am less likely to forget a key step. How in the world do women EVER fall in?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:26 AM
5

I mean, toilet paper is a thing.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:17 AM
4

The post itself is a joke. It's ok to have a laugh around here. It doesn't have to be all circumcisions and alimony all the time. We can chuckle on occasion without anyone getting hurt.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:15 AM
1

Well get the word out to the ones who call themselves feminists but cheer for stuff like this.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 07:49 PM
1

What does it do?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 09:49 AM
2

Let's see, who is the parent most likely to help their daughter learn how to attract a man. How to dress in revealing outfits that accentuate their sexuality and objectify themselves as a tactic for drawing male attention instead of relying on their intellect and personality. In my experience most fathers don't want to teach their daughters how to attract a man at all. I'm pretty sure the mothers are responsible for all of that. On the flip side women who take objectification to the extreme and …
/r/MensRights03/04/17 10:15 PM
12

Circumcised myself You might want to reword that to "I am circumcised myself...." Upon first glance I cringed at the thought of someone performing their own circumcision.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:26 AM
2

It was originally developed for blood thinning purposes. The creation of a drug that could help you get an erection was discovered by accident. I'm not sure why blood thinning medication would be of use to soldiers either but that might have something to do with it.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:22 AM
9

At this point he has to be trolling. You can't inbreed enough to produce that level of stupid.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:19 AM
3

Good day troll Or am I giving you too much credit?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:17 AM
5

Yeah, he is actually literally saying exactly that.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:51 PM
10

Ok, and how would you categorize those who are pro-genital-mutilation such as yourself?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:50 PM
10

Define "crazy".
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:47 PM
5

Yeah. Nobody's gonna bat an eyelash if a male is sexually assaulted. But not flipping out at the hint of an accusation AGAINST a male is bad business.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:40 AM
23

"Drake knew this male had a life long language-based disability, ADHD, and anxiety, which had been accommodated in the classroom. But during the nine hour hearing Drake forced Rossley’s disabled son to be his own advocate and lawyer, while denying disability accommodations." That is a direct quote from the article. It mentions more than the ADHD and the fact that he was forced to represent himself with no legal council. You obviously read that because you mentioned the ADHD and then CHOSE to ign…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:23 AM
5

Women don't have to sleep with their boss for wage equality. They already have wage equality.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 11:05 AM
14

What's idiotic about it?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:46 PM
8

What's upsetting you?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:44 PM
1

.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 06:42 PM
2

Oh dear god. Now I'm getting the "the government decided it's ok and they know what's best so that's the end of the argument". Go back to fondling daddy government's ball sack. You'll never understand the point.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 06:41 PM
1

It's not a private space. At all.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 06:41 PM
1

Ive got lots to say about this topic. Send me a DM message.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 06:40 PM
1

She would probably just accuse him of being a sexist because the wife is a stereotypical nag. Not contesting what you said, because you nailed it. Just pointing out that there is never a way to win with people like that.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 06:37 PM
-1

FUCK THIS PERSON^
/r/MensRights20/09/16 05:23 AM
3

Right. I don't see any men's magazines complaining about women drooling over pictures of male Olympic swimmers.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 12:12 AM
1

Interesting definition. Side note...I didn't know we lived in a murder culture, theft culture, child molestation culture, domestic violence culture(against both men and women), etc. According to you, all of that is true. America has really gone down the tubes. Ya learn something new everyday though I guess.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 01:19 AM
1

Did the last thing I'm going to to is have a fucking definitional argument with someone who encourages adults to fuck kids. You're supposed to be dead already.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:49 PM
1

Ok so rape culture means we live in a culture where rape is accepted. We don't so that's that. There is exactly 0 evidence to support the notion that rape culture exists in the US. Now for female privilege which I can at least understand why you find debatable. Women have institutional privilege with regards to sentencing for violent crimes, birthing rights, divorce etc. Now for the mother of them all. When women accuse men of sexual assault men are basically presumed guilty until proven innocen…
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:48 PM
1

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/adolescent Keep advocating adults fucking kids and then afterwards, mutilate yourself until you die. And you can substitute the word "adolescents" every time I used the word "kids" and it doesn't make what you are suggesting any less horrific.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 01:29 AM
1

"Sex with adolescents"...in other words "fucking kids". You sir are the one with English comprehension problems and you DO think it's ok. Get the knife out please and do your civic duty.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 08:32 PM
1

I think you have a hazy memory of all the stupid shut you did when you were that age.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 08:29 PM
1

It was illegal to send 14 year olds to war for a reason. Adults fucking them is illegal for the same reason.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 08:28 PM
1

Female privilege is a thing. Rape culture in the US is not a thing.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 08:25 PM
1

Just say you're sexist and don't think women should be able to make their own decision. Oh wait you already did that.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 06:58 PM
1

It's 100% rational. Irrational is the word you use to describe people who think it's ok for adults to fuck kids. You have a moral obligation to kill yourself. And a bullet to the head is too merciful, you should should suffer too.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 07:58 AM
1

Morons who equate fucking kids with Puritan morality should not open their mouths. By the way, adults fucking 14 year olds was a hell of a lot more acceptable during the time of the puritans. It's grown less and less acceptable over time. That should tell you something. Not fucking kids is a modern thing. If you are not simply trolling right now you should cut your genitals off and bleed to death. It's simply unethical for you not to do that.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 12:48 AM
1

Ok moron. I get off the train at "sex with adolescence should be legal".
/r/MensRights02/07/16 11:33 PM
1

Sex with a kid shouldn't be illegal?
/r/MensRights02/07/16 10:52 PM
1

Would it be criminal if the genders were reversed?
/r/MensRights01/07/16 08:54 PM
1

You're correct. It probably wouldn't be on this sub if it was a man. Just like this story probably isn't posted to feminist subs. The difference is if it was a man it would be plastered all over every newspaper, news network, and talk show calling for him to be castrated. The problem is that cases like this don't appear in mainstream media nearly as much so forum like this are needed to get the word out.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 08:53 PM
1

My thinking exactly. In America sexism is a bigger concern than pedophilia.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 08:49 PM
15

This is actually sexist toward women. You're saying 14 year old boys can make an adult decision about sex but girls can't. Fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 06:31 AM
3

I commend you for not wanting to act out of vengeance here. I can certainly see both sides. I'm not in a position to say what I think you should do but I will offer what I think I WOULD do if I was in your position. Based on all the details you offered I would not feel particularly compelled to pursue criminal charges since A) You don't seem to feel that the experience of being raped had a particularly traumatic effect on you and B) She will always be the mother of your child and putting her beh…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 05:26 AM
1

Silence. What a shocker.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 05:06 AM
1

The argument there would be if you can force her to have sex with you you could force her to sign the documents. You are guilty until proven innocent so if you are accused of rape then you must've forced her to sign the document.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:08 AM
1

Thank you . It's sad that this has to be explained in such great detail when it is so obvious. I like the napkin dispenser analogy and I'm going to hold onto it. I wonder if dangerine considers everyone who takes a napkin from a restaurant without asking to be guilty of theft.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:44 AM
2

No I'm saying by not saying no while she is an active participant in the sexual act is consent. That is what pretty much everyone but you is saying.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:39 AM
1

Also, define consent please. You won't because you can't.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:47 AM
2

Not according to that poster. According to that poster most areas of consensual sex are grey. Most people think that if a woman gives every sign that she is a willing participant and never speaks up in opposition then the sex is consensual. According to that poster, the fact that she never said "no" doesn't matter. By that definition pretty much every man alive is a rapist. By that definition I raped my girlfriend of over a year hundreds of times. Not once, NOT ONE SINGLE SOLITARY TIME, did she …
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:41 AM
-4

If she was a willing participant and didn't say no. You're just gonna conveniently ignore the other 90% of my post huh? Better question. At what point was she raped?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:13 AM
-2

Also, how can you claim that a deaf mute woman can't have consetual sex? That seems pretty awful of you.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 01:24 AM
-4

No, I'm concerned about a poster that tries to redefine consent so that even when a woman gives consent a man can still be considered a rapist. And as far as the poster goes, you know the last line is bullshit. If a woman is a willing participant and never resists, that is consent. The fact that she didn't verbally give consent doesn't all of a sudden change consensual sex into rape. According to that poster nearly every man who has ever lived is a rapist. Given your pathetic attitude you probab…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 01:22 AM
5

"Of course, the yes doesn't need to be verbal. If she starts to stroke you, that is pretty clearly a yes." This is not the message that is being put out these days though. If she starts to stroke you, that isn't enough. She has to verbally agree. However, later she can just say she never verbally agreed and then the guy is still fucked. I wonder what the feminazis think about the girl grabbing and stroking a guys dick without constant. If she does not ask "may I grab and stroke your dick?" and h…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 11:03 PM
-4

What the fuck are you talking about. If you invite a woman back to your place, invite her to the bedroom and she follows, fools around on the bed and removes her clothes and then you have sex with her that is rape? What the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:55 PM
1

Here...I'm giving you attention!!! Happy yet?
/r/MensRights30/12/15 08:41 AM
1

You must be a millennial.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:05 AM
1

You think I'm a crusty old fuck based on a bunch of info you made up. Indicative of an ignorant pussy.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:58 AM
1

I have not been discourteous at all. I have simply been reasserting my opinion because no matter how many time I repeat my position you respond by telling me it's something completely different. It is laughable how angry you are getting because: I think this new generation has become pussified and I don't consider that progress. All that stuff you said about what this generation is will do pure conjecture and yet to be proven. And even if it is true, I still think this generation is pussified an…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:44 AM
2

Well put. I hope the troll reads this and gets a little insight.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:12 AM
1

Feel free to say something relevant any time.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:11 AM
1

Honest question: Are you just trolling me? I can't for the life of me figure out how you've attached all this other shit to me in your mind.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:10 AM
1

I never said this generation is on the decline. I think there are a lot more pussies in the millennial generation and I don't consider that progress. You're argument is infected by the straw man fallacy. I'm not sure why you even need me to debate. You keep telling me what I think(even though I've repeatedly said otherwise) and then you argue with that. Again: I don't think the pussification of a generation constitutes progress. Now go ahead and clarify for me AGAIN what is going on in my own mi…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:06 AM
2

I could give a flying fuck about whether or not this generation respects me or my peers or our ideology. Where the fuck did you come up with that nonsense? I just think they're a bunch of pussies. I'm not asking anyone to abide by a standard I've set. In actuality, it is that generation that is telling everyone else to change their behavior in order to protect their feelings. What I'm saying is: I don't think the pussification of a generation constitutes progress. Not that complicated. Looking f…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 12:11 AM
2

I do. There was a limited number of people who rearranged everything about how they lived their life to follow a certain life philosophy. That's a lot more of a lifestyle shift than being a bitch and whining about how reality doesn't suit you. I am in my thirties but I am also back in school now trying to finish up my degree and you can't imagine some of the sissified nonsense that comes out of their mouths. Furthermore, I stick by my original statement. I don't think pussification is progress. …
/r/MensRights25/12/15 11:50 PM
2

Technically I just fall into the upper end of the age range. However I do not identify with most of the ideals I see coming from them.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 11:27 PM
-1

Yeah that's all near and I agree with a lot of it. I also think it's bad that millennials think they need to have their feelings hurt. I understand that exactly the point you were making but I still don't think a generation of pussies is indicative of progress.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 08:31 PM
2

Yes it is good that we don't have wars like that going on(yet). It is simultaneously bad that millennials are giant sissies. Both can be true at the same time and I'm not sure it's an example of progress.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 07:56 PM
3

"Well somebody's doing the raping" -Trump
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:58 AM
4

I still haven't seen the transcript from the Twitter discussion. Does anybody have it?
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:42 AM
1

Fuckin' cissy
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter