TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OhMyMoogle Archive

View 4 posts and 93 comments by OhMyMoogle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

As the grown daughter of a dad who got dragged through the mud, She'll see it eventually. And someday she will also probably be mad at you because she doesn't understand why you aren't there more. Try not to take it too personally. I still feel awful for some things I said to my dad when we first reconnected.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 02:33 AM
1

Felony murder. Someone died as a result of a felony, making it first degree murder.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 01:59 AM
12

I saw a study at one point that actually said that consensual sex showed the same amount of vaginal tearing as rape (failing other kinds of trauma).
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:04 PM
2

Person A is still cheating on Person B by sleeping with Person C. Person C may not be guilty of anything at all, but Person A is still a cheating whore.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:17 PM
-1

To be fair, Germany also bans books, so I'd hardly try to reason with them using that logic.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:14 PM
3

I think I read somewhere on the paperwork they sent me that it can prevent you from getting a license too.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:34 AM
10

No one should be required to sign up for the draft.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:33 AM
53

I think it comes from the 2X experience. Over there you really do need to apologize for being male or be downvoted into oblivion
/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:46 PM
-1

For a couple that has been together as long as they have, marriage comes with all sorts of benefits that would cost thousands and thousands of dollars if they did not get married. One same-sex couple went through all the paperwork and ended up spending $10,000 to get the same benefits that come with a marriage license.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 02:31 AM
1

Have you ever seen any of the Jackass movies? They punch, kick, and otherwise injure each other in the testicular area more than they do anything else. Is it funny? I don't particularly think so, but apparently someone does or they wouldn't sell movies. Is it a good idea? Clearly not, but that whole series would probably be a better example to "letting someone kick us in the balls for entertainment".
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:02 PM
4

"All women are created equal. And then some of them become marines." There's a line poster that says something along those lines in the music video. Because women who are marines are automatically "better" than any woman who does anything else with their life. It's not so much the encouraging them to join the army that's the problem as it is the insinuating that anyone who does anything else is a lesser human being.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:54 PM
4

Glen Callender of Canadian Foreskin Awareness Project will be “performing,” showing his own foreskin, how easy it is to clean and will even perform a trick he says those who are circumcised cannot do. I'm assuming that this is why it is for adult eyes only. Because showing children your junk is generally not accepted within the realms of polite society.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:39 AM
1

As the eldest of eight I feel your pain, brother.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 12:20 AM
6

From USA Today's article on the FBI rape definition change: The new provision will define rape as any kind of penetration of another person, regardless of gender, without the victim's consent. It also includes a broad range of rapes involving both males and females in which attackers use objects to penetrate their victims. So it looks like yes, rape with an object is counted here in the states.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 03:49 PM
9

I wouldn't exactly call the bris a "front-door" practice as it is.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 12:41 AM
2

To be fair, you can buy chocolate with food stamps.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:56 PM
5

Define "invest", because I'm pretty sure not being homeless and not starving don't count as vices. I've seen this statistic before and from what I remember it completely disregards bills and mortgage and counts things like clothing, shoes, food, and other things like that.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 03:25 PM
11

"We are helping those who feared getting circumcised through cultural processes," said program leader Badru Wasike, who told Africa Report that it was a cultural and health exercise. "We are aware that circumcised men do not easily get infected with HIV/AIDS. Since they love our relatives we want them to be safe." They think they are helping the people they are circumcising in the same way that many American parents think they're doing right by their baby boys by having them circumcised. It isn'…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:51 PM
22

The only way to stop things like this from happening is through education. Instead of preaching the false benefits of circumcision, activists in this area need to focus on actual solutions to the HIV/AIDS crisis. Namely, testing people and informing them of their status along with truthful ways of preventing the spread of the disease to others.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 03:03 PM
1

Actually, several states have laws specifically about cyber bullying.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:05 AM
1

You're forgetting the other half of the feminists who will be praising them for their "sexual empowerment". Two sides of every coin.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 11:52 PM
4

Source for this information can be found here.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 11:43 PM
1

I recommend this Tumblr for anyone trying to restore and anyone who supports the intactivist movement. He posts some great things about circumcision and is happy to answer any questions about his restoration progress. Edit: specifically - Ten Things I've learned from foreskin restoration
/r/MensRights23/06/12 11:30 PM
3

Since "cyber bullying". It's the new catch-all for "so-and-so did something entirely innocent at their own house that hurt my feelings!" that allows school administrations to punish students for things they do from home.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 11:09 PM
1

The numbers for people receiving social security benefits can be found here. The meaning of the different types of "insured" can be found here. I don't have the ability to actually crunch the numbers myself at the moment, but they're there.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:57 PM
2

Actually... Full retirement age (also called "normal retirement age") had been 65 for many years. However, beginning with people born in 1938 or later, that age gradually increases until it reaches 67 for people born after 1959. and... The earliest a person can start receiving Social Security retirement benefits will remain at age 62. So men manage to benefit even less from it under these new standards because the retirement age keeps going up, while the difference in life expectancy remains the…
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:48 PM
2

Not to detract from your post, but this should really have a NSFW tag.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:42 PM
1

It's nice to see the court doing something right for a change.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 11:39 PM
3

Why should schools even be allowed to ask for gender or race on an application instead of looking only at the applicant's credentials? Because affirmative action, that's why.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:30 PM
2

The update at the bottom from this morning claims to have been posted by her daughter, so it would appear that they are now in control of it if they weren't before.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:24 PM
6

Home-schooling isn't always a bad thing, so long as it isn't being used as a form of imprisonment and isolation.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:13 PM
1

Yes, and interpreted as a metaphor. When a couple decides to have a baby, they both go through varying degrees of pain throughout the pregnancy. Groupon seems to be more giving props to the dads for the work they put in during pregnancy that often goes unnoticed.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 09:58 PM
9

I would take this more as a jab at the fact that he had to deal with your mother for nine months, rather than making fun of fathers for not being pregnant themselves. But everything is subjective.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 07:27 PM
1

That, to me, sounds even less positive than just calling it a "fantastic rite". He's writing in a formal tone and using the word in the way it should be used, rather than the way it is commonly used.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 11:34 AM
1

The dictionary definition of 'fantastic' is as follows: conceived or appearing as if conceived by an unrestrained imagination; odd and remarkable; bizarre; grotesque: fantastic rock formations; fantastic designs. In all likelihood, he was not using 'fantastic' to have a positive meaning.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 11:27 PM
8

Near the beginning of the school year, my high school put up posters on the insides of all the girls bathroom stalls with the helpline numbers on them. When I asked the boys about it - Nothing. None of them had any idea that this was even going on.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 11:21 PM
7

If she's ended up in jail for it, there are records of it. Go to the police.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:55 PM
1

I think the old idea is that woman are "too emotional" to handle combat, therefore we should sit back and let the men do it.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 09:25 PM
2

I think the equivalent for gals would be social networks. In the same way that video games reward players for "fake" violence, social networks (or, more accurately, the people on them) encourage the exchanging of violent words and the sacrifice of face-to-face communication in the same way that something like Xbox Live does. It would be interesting to see an essay comparing social networks and video games to see how they would match up.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 11:54 PM
8

You assume here that his sister must be massively sexist in order to participate. Have you considered that she might just want to do something to benefit cancer research and OP may not have expressed to her that he finds it offensive? To someone who has not been acquainted with the MRM, this event probably seems entirely harmless just as any other single-sex sporting event would be.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 10:28 PM
4

In his plan iIf the child is kept or given up for adoption, it would stay in a trust fund for the child. If the woman chose to have an abortion, the $50,000 would go towards "sex-ed".
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:39 PM
3

Why not start a similar campaign through /r/MensRights? If you want something done right, you have to do it yourself.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 10:22 PM
1

It doesn't surprise me much that this story comes out of New England. Our Family Court laws are archaic and discriminatory, but no one seems to be making any effort to change them. In New Hampshire specifically, some places don't even have Family Court anymore. Family Court cases are turfed over to (I think) Probate Court. In addition to that, parents are not given any sort of right to an attorney in what would be Family cases. (Source)
/r/MensRights22/04/12 09:45 AM
12

As a woman, I would honestly equate women like this with men who rape with the intention of getting a woman pregnant. Imagine the uproar if an MRA had written an article saying "Women seem to think that they can just stop us from impregnating them whenever we want to! How dare they?!" ?
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:34 AM
0

You're trying to argue with someone who agrees with you. See where I'm going with this?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 10:53 PM
0

The petition itself compares them. I asked why it would be a federal issue as opposed to a state issue because everything contained in the petition except circumcision is a state issue already. "Non-therapeutic body modification" includes everything from ear-piercings to amputations.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:28 PM
4

Evidence, evidence, evidence. Save everything. Remember to make sure you lock text messages in your phone so that they do not get auto-deleted as you get more. You might also consider contacting a lawyer if you have the ability.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:27 AM
1

In the jail system here, you can't be admitted to general population without actually being charged with a crime. I'm not sure how it works anywhere else, but that seems like it makes sense coming from here.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:19 AM
3

"Benefits" that could even include your drivers' license, depending on where you live.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:02 AM
0

Things like piercings remain on a state level though. I suppose having one blanket law like the petition is pushing for wouldn't really work in practice.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 05:25 PM
-1

Can you explain why you think it should be a federal issue as oppose to a state issue? Most other laws concerning children are turfed over to the states.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 04:53 PM
2

The skin covering it keeps the area moist and keeps germs out so that there is no loss of sensitivity. That's why foreskin retracts when you become erect.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:26 PM
8

Why should it matter what women prefer? Can you imagine the uproar from feminists if men started suggesting all 13-year-old girls have labiaplasty because it will "look better"? Why should circumcision be any different?
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:23 PM
1

If your son is old enough to feel isolated for having a different looking penis than his dad, he shouldn't be looking at his dad's penis anymore.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:14 PM
-2

Excellent paragraph. I would be interested to read the whole paper if you had a chance to post it.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 09:58 PM
2

Sorry to say, but I know of plenty of Americans who pierced their babies' ears a lot sooner than that...
/r/MensRights01/04/12 12:26 AM
2

Too Much Information
/r/MensRights30/03/12 02:25 PM
16

(Possible TMI ahead: You have been warned) Most of the injuries that they're talking about seem to be very very minor. The article says they have to use special dye to be able to see them. I find that about 20% of the time I experience some form of tearing or another. (Generally not a major inconvenience, just a little soreness) And almost all the time there's some minor bruising. Bear in mind, these are just my own experiences, but this study seems to say similar things.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:37 AM
6

Am I the only one who thinks the title is horrendously offensive?
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:31 PM
1

That's up to the DA though. He can push for them to file charges and they probably will, but things he can do on his own are pretty limited.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 11:35 AM
2

It is notable that this method is not a pill, but an injection similar to Depo-Provera for women. (But not really) Put simply: It coats the tubes that carry sperm in a fluid that will kill them, but is easily flushed out with another injection.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:37 AM
1

How is this whole practice not molestation?
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:23 AM
1

Teenagers are going to (entirely of their own accord) decide to have sex. It is going to happen. No amount of law-making or bureaucratic nonsense is going to deter that. In fact, making laws confusing like this only makes it more likely that they will be unintentionally broken, even though neither party involved is being harmed. Laws about child pornography are also in desperate need of updating with the digital age. 15-year-old girls who take scandalous pictures and send them to their boyfriend…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:18 AM
1

I am so sick of hearing this. Wikipedia is as valid as any other encyclopedia source. You should always be double checking your information, no matter where it comes from.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 11:59 AM
5

Take lots of pictures immediately and take it to civil court. Not much else you can do.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 11:35 AM
1

Document EVERYTHING. I cannot stress that enough. The government really really does not like to take children away from their mother's, no matter how abusive they may be. As soon as the child can talk, get it to a therapist to talk about the home situation Whenever something physical happens, take LOTS of pictures, see a doctor, and report it to the police. If she has drug or alcohol problems, get statements from friends, family, etc. to document those. Get copies of her medical records brought …
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:24 PM
1

Does anyone else remember Thomas Ball? I'm not sure how widespread the news was, but it happened a stone's throw from my house so it has stuck with me.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:16 PM
1

Everything about the article itself came across like they thought nothing that she did in her life was her fault. There was no personal accountability for the choices that she made.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:12 PM
4

Not according to the American Cancer Society it's not. Though even if it were, this wouldn't be a good justification for mutilating our children.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:02 PM
8

(For the most part) These seem like perfectly reasonable reasons to say no to sex. The other article they linked had many more shocking and offensive ones. It seems like they both just took whichever responses they thought would get them the most attention and used those, rather that ones that were more frequent.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 10:54 PM
9

The entire article seems to aim to dehumanize men and appeal to women in such a way that it comes off as not being offensive. While some of his points do have some truth to them, the way he presents them is as if he has just done some sort of scientific research on the mating habits of seagulls rather than on psychological influences on human beings. There was actually some good discussion about this going on over at TwoX as well.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 10:46 PM
1

It could definitely be the age gap (college freshman, so most of my friends are anywhere from 16-21). I would think that younger people would be more accepting of the differences though, if circumcision rates are falling as rapidly as they seem to be. I did find it a bit odd that this wasn't covered in any of the junior high/high school health classes we were all forced to sit through.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:09 PM
1

As an American female, I find that in discussions with my friends they generally have a very low opinion of men being uncircumcised. While it may be becoming more common, women (in general) still cling to the idea that circumcised is the norm. Being intact is still regarded as "icky" and "unclean".
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:32 PM
4

Saying "uncircumcised" to mean "not circumcised" adds the same effect as using "intact", but in the opposite direction. It makes it seem as if it would not be normal to not be circumcised, turning people off from it.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:04 PM
6

I was always confused about why it would be UNcircumcised as opposed to NONcircumcised. Nothing has been undone. It was just never done in the first place. The word itself adds to the issues that many Americans have with leaving foreskin intact.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:02 PM
1

Anything and everything that is done to one's own body without the potential to (actually) harm others should be legal.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 09:25 PM
1

This Tumblr has some great info/posts about reversing circumcision and intactivism in general.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 09:21 PM
2

They actually specifically have a rule about being a "naturally born female". While they might also have rules about plastic surgery, this was why they kicked her out.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 09:13 PM
8

TL;DR Because infants are human beings, not property to use and throw out as you please.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 04:21 AM
1

As much as I understand the original intent of registries, it seems to me that they are in need of a complete overhaul. People are being put on them for ridiculous things that they were never intended for and there's a whole lot of work involved in getting off the registry if you've been put on it, even for something nonviolent.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 10:25 PM
1

If someone attacks you, you are perfectly right to hit them back. I tell my little brothers the same thing.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 09:39 PM
1

Insane? Definitely, but it happens. Not the way our justice system was intended to function, nor the way it should, but sadly that is what it has come to.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:49 PM
1

I could be wrong, but I think those go away if the charges are thrown out.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:48 PM
49

The charges were probably filed as a way to shut their parents up and will be thrown out as soon as a reasonable person looks at them
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:41 PM
3

XX here: I kind of understand where she's coming from, being jealous and hurt that someone else might take on a similar role to hers in her child's life, especially in a major sense. That being said, I think if she was actually looking for the best interests of her child, she would understand that forcing his father to hide something like that from him isn't going to go unnoticed. In the long run, this will probably only harm his relationship with his father. (I guess she might be aiming for tha…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 03:35 AM
6

Ideally, it should be a joint decision of both parents. If the mother wants it and the father doesn't he should be able to financially say that he doesn't want any part of it. If the father wants it and the mother doesn't there isn't really an equivalent that could be offered. That is a female perspective, but I know my opinions aren't shared by most.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 03:29 PM
1

I was unaware of that, figured it just meant intercourse since they used "woman" in the legal definition.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 03:02 PM
2

Google Docs has a questionnaire tool-type thing. I've never made something with it, but answering seems simple enough from my experience.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 01:21 AM
1

So much this. Why did they change the wording in the first place? I think "forced carnal knowledge of another person" would have sufficed and covered that base.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 01:16 AM
1

Why does there have to be penetration for it to be rape? Now men can be raped, but only by other men so females are still incapable of being punished for forcing a man to have intercourse with them.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 11:26 PM
7

By that logic, aren't vibrators demeaning to men? Sending the "you aren't good enough so I need this" message?
/r/MensRights06/01/12 11:22 PM
3

rapists said to collect semen I don't even...
/r/MensRights05/01/12 10:17 PM
0

Migrant 2X-er here, can someone explain to me why the campaign is sexist? I don't quite understand and thought it was actually a pretty nice, classy campaign.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 01:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter