TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OmegaZero2 Archive

View 2 posts and 45 comments by OmegaZero2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah but most competitive sports are already like that. For example the NBA is open for men and woman to play but only men make it. Why? Because the woman are not skilled or strong enough to do so. That’s why the made the WNBA so the woman could compete against other woman. If anything what you’re requesting would be the end of woman’s sports which is already heavily impacted by the MtF trans community coming in and shattering all the records.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 07:36 PM
0

The reason there aren’t mixed sports is to give women the opportunity to compete. Because in 99% of sports men outclass the woman in mostly all age ranges. If they mixed them, all the teams would end up being male only as women don’t have the physical capabilities to match men in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 12:35 PM
4

Nah you have to ask what cup size they are since that convo is over once she asks the height/income questions
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 04:45 AM
3

20M in the US grew up in a retirement area with lots of old married people but not a lot of young adults or kids my age. It definitely didn’t help me become more social as a kid since I didn’t really relate to any of them but did make me think that ltr and marriage for life was possible. However as I got older I saw a lot more of adults hating being married or wishing for their youth back. In college my head coach broke down because the wife divorced him and took his son and daughter from him wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 07:35 PM
1

I get that it’s a joke but I like thinking about the hypothetical situations in which humanity is fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 05:29 PM
6

As long as a single male survives then the answer will be yes as 1 male can impregnate thousands of women but women have limited eggs and a 9 month cool down every pregnancy. Thats why there must be more females than males so the species doesn’t die off. Same thing If the genders were reversed. And the 1% that survives will be treated like gods as their humanities last hope, unless they create way to artificially impregnate themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 05:25 PM
13

Technically it would be, for the survivors, as less total men makes the remaining men’s value increase significantly as there are less of them aka scarcities create value. It would be interesting to see how having a 2:1 female to male ratio would affect the dating/marriage scene though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 12:29 PM
2

It’s definitely a niche category but I would love a super fit woman that could kick my ass. To me it shows that she’s willing to put in the work to be healthy, pretty much not overweight, which is really important to me. Although it has a limit namely the physique that is only possible through steroids isn’t very appealing but anything below that is fair game. At the end of the day, what a guys attracted to is what he’s attracted to. It can be influenced based on his environment and experiences …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 04:52 AM
1

There are similar cases in the US for visas and green cards to gain citizenship as being married in is usually easier/faster than attempting to do so solo.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 09:02 PM
1

My view is based in the US so your nations customs most likely differ but here there are a plethora of tax benefits and deductions for filing as a joint couple which is inaccessible for most people. So examples are increased tax returns, lower interest rates on loans, and higher caps for investment accounts like a 401k or Roth. As you probably know outside of Medicare and medicaid most health insurance plans are tied to your employer so by legally being married both you and your significant othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 09:01 PM
1

The definition of commitment is the state or quality of being dedicated to a cause, activity, etc. Commitment is a part of a relationship with marriage effectively being a legal relationship. What separates marriage from a regular relationship is access to various tax deductions that are specialized for married individuals, shared healthcare insurance, and inheritance once one of you dies. You don’t need these things to have a good relationship but if you plan to have kids or want to legally max…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:50 PM
1

I listed those pros as both them and the cons can happen in or out of marriage. By commitment I meant legally binding to another person which has financial risk in the event that it doesn’t work out but the benefits of a healthy marriage can change lives and even generations which is a reason people still get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:29 PM
1

True but there will always be a lower class as every governmental system needs people to do jobs no one else will. It doesn’t mean that we stop trying to make a difference but be should put more focus on subjects that would improve their base standard of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:15 PM
1

That is problematic as deforestation and ecosystem destruction does heavily impact the environment however I’m not really sold on not have children is the answer. The problem is that on an individual level people’s opinions on having children change rapidly and is heavily influenced by their social relationships. Wouldn’t it be more effective to focus on more efficient energy sources or new ways to produce the food we need that is less environmentally impactful?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:12 PM
2

And on the other hand pros: they could be loving, they could save your life, they could change to better accommodate your needs that you can’t get by yourself, they could ask to work with you to be more fit, and they could help financially by paying bills or creating investments. While separating once married separating is more complicated and financial detrimental then if there wasn’t a commitment, the benefits of a successful marriage can create generational wealth and happiness for both parti…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:40 PM
1

I wouldn’t say the world is overpopulated yet as there is still massive amounts of land and territories that we as a species can utilize. It’s just that a lot of people want to live in the same few areas which causes price to go up and the customs of certain nations consume more resources than they need because people desire them and will do anything to get it. I agree that it is traditional but it serves a purpose to the community and society that you live in. There should be the option to have…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:32 PM
1

True marriage isn’t something that you should just rush into and instead researched extensively to see it the risks are worth the goods.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:06 PM
7

It also makes it easier to generate wealth as the caps for investments (401k, Roth, HSA) are significantly higher, health insurance coverage is better, and most loans have discounted rates for married couples rather than single people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:02 PM
1

Valid points above, and for the last question I believe that some people don’t commit in fear that once they do it would result in both parties decreasing their efforts to please each other as they get comfortable. By not committing there is always the option to leave so in theory they would both do their best to please each other but it could breed resentment/distrust in the relationship that wouldn’t be there if they were married.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:57 PM
1

Marring was introduced as a control mechanism to create piece in society by promoting monogamy. It allows for more people to reproduce thus increasing population size and overall happiness compared to polyamory which often breaks down poorly if done incorrectly and can incite jealousy/envy. Unofficially both genders cheat a lot during relationships for a multitude of reasons that only make sense to the individual. People should have the right to open relationships but open marriages imo destroy …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:53 PM
1

I was just asking if it was worth it and based on the fact that it keeps getting asked means that there is room for understanding and clarification. The purpose of the post was to create an opportunity for people to evaluate the worth of marriage as a whole. I already have a strong stance on marriage but I was asking in a general sense otherwise it would be a cmv post.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:46 PM
1

It’s not impossible but wouldn’t you be really limited in options as women overwhelmingly prefer to have kids with those that commit to them? If you wanted to pass on your genetics you could donate sperm instead that way your less likely on the hook to take care of the kids and no one person to tie you down.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:40 PM
7

I read it but there is a large selection bias as it took singles -> married -> stayed married which means that it doesn’t compare the “happiness” of those men to say never married men or divorced men. Plus people tend to overinflated or under sell their experiences when asked via a survey or interview.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:35 PM
5

I agree, especially with your last paragraph as it’s the key piece that most people miss. An entire relationship is built on the values of the individuals in it and finding people with similar values will generally lead to better relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:24 PM
3

And that is the beauty of choice as both options could or could not happen. It just boils down to the desires/standards of the individuals and what they will do to make the relationship work.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:21 PM
4

Idk about that, you most definitely can argue that sacrifice has a cost and benefit. I would say that it started as a control mechanism to promote monogamy which is heavily beneficial for any society. Over time there were incentives added to convince more people to become and stay monogamous as polygamy breeds jealousy/envy which then leads to chaos.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:19 PM
18

There is that and many women would be rather skeptical of having kids with a guy in the first place if they weren’t married unless it was unexpected.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:04 PM
2

At least you gain valuable experiences and personal development. But would a prenup really have changed anything as their often tossed out especially the longer the marriage lasts?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:02 PM
1

Added insurance on there, as the cap is much higher and lower rates/deductible with better coverage too.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:00 PM
6

True it seems that your social circle and if you want kids are the biggest draws toward being married. It might also be an ego thing where you know that your desired by another person romantically.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 11:48 AM
1

That sounds about right especially as you age since by the mid 20’s to early 30’s people want to settle down and plant their roots.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 11:44 AM
4

Excellent reply, I think a lot of it has to do with the social setting and goals an individual has. Like I’m willing to date around casually for now but will only consider a LTR/marriage after I get my career started as money issues are a huge factor for most LTR. There is also the factor of choosing someone that you personally get along with and it’s the disconnect that creates many of the issues that cause the relationships to fail, but it’s really difficult and expensive to get right.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 11:41 AM
2

That’s fair as both the mother and father are critical in the development of the child. Yet even if both parties don’t want kids is it still a bad deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 11:37 AM
9

I mean same can be said about the guy. Plus taste changes as you get older/more experienced so I wouldn’t say it’s a con
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 11:25 AM
2

I believe they are very similar to one another as it’s another responsibility that takes time from both parties in the relationship. I only hear this argument from people who think of kids/relationships as accessories that they can collect and ignore until they need it. I personally do want kids as I feel it’s important to leave a legacy behind and continue the family bloodline. And I would definitely sacrifice some of my personal time/comforts to ensure that they had the best life possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 10:39 AM
1

It seems that you choose very well, what would you say helped you find the correct person to spend your life with?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 10:35 AM
2

Care to elaborate on why it isn’t? As there’s a significant portion of men who do get married rather early.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 10:32 AM
6

How does marriage play into the building of a community?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 10:23 AM
2

That’s a tough claim though as people change drastically over time. How do you know that a person won’t be like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 10:17 AM
2

Interesting take I didn’t realize that the laws around marriage change so drastically. But I’m curious as to why the UC/UMC continues to marry at high rates even though many of the benefits could be achieved without having to be married as they have the most to lose by doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 10:13 AM
7

Like they can’t go out, hang out with their friends as much, or just spontaneously do stuff because wife/family needs them at home
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 10:09 AM
1

No. By dating equality I mean that hypothetically both sides have to put in similar amounts of effort which results in similar outcomes. Basically everyone that looks for a partner has an equal opportunity to find one. Personally I believe it started that way but systems both biological and social caused there to be an imbalance within the dating marketplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 07:10 PM
1

The cultural pressure is real either as a man you get all the sex you can or you’re a failure or as a woman if you can’t lock a man down you’re a disgrace to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:56 PM
2

I agree that relationships should be based on the growth of both parties otherwise it usually ends up with one person providing everything which leads to resentment. If you look at people who are still married today most of them are near a 50/50 relationship, it’s just harder in today’s era with instant gratification being the norm plus economic issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:49 PM
2

The problem is that relationships are never truly 50/50 as different people have varying opinions and skills. Not to mention that love quickly fades once the novelty of a relationship wears off, those that stay together usually have a power imbalance that forces them to stay or are willing to make sacrifices for the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 09:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter